The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-24_LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE - TOWN & COUNTRY HOMESNon -Scannable Item Item /Z". C Description .0 Folder Number 2-1 Folder Name 5 2 1 Job Number 2 3 2 2 Box Number tce OT a®u -GO-DEP. -463-3 j� \ , _ IN/ �nwwolfceaeW�-c �'/ j G� C b�6z swj A,c,�_ 06 dy •y.�dpo�oc ^c. 't O vlv ,. v63�aFg0 R IMB %..w'' 4L" "j 5°V,,( s TV :1 To: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)-227-1100 (952)-227-1110 fax Patrick Neaton Neaton & Puklich 7975 Stone Creek Drive , Suite 120 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ship To: Same Invoice SALESPERSON TODAY'S DATE SHIPPED VIA PAYMENT DUE 3-19-12 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Copies 122 8'/z x 11 Black/White 25 30.50 5 81/2 x 11 Color .50 2.50 9 11 x 17 Black/white .50 4.50 2 11 x 17 Color 1.00 2.00 SUBTOTAL $39.50 SALES TAX $2.72 TOTAL DUE$ $42.22 If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: Bob (952)-227-1131. THANK YOU! SCANNED SCANNED NEATON & PUKLICH, P.L L P PATRICK J. NEATON ATTORNEY AT LAW 7975 STONE CREEK DRIVE. SUITE 120 CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA 55317 PHONE 952.258.8444 FAX 952.258.9988 CITY OF CHANHAS.-EN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN E5317 03/19/2012 2:15 PM Receipt No. 001:;2959 CLERK: bethanya PAYEE: NEATON AND PUKLICH 7975 STONE CRE'' -K DRIVE -120 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Planning Case 05-24 ------------------------------------------------------- COPY/Fax 33.SC Sales Tax 2.72 Total Cash Check 6528 Change 1).cc 4_'.2. SCANNED ,ofe+eimal Swvk m Ina I r— wi +a noun oa�are wgryn 1 1 —/ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Mn. op Mea 651-1552-116 Mn. Tdl free 1-800-252-1168 I=+1 1 1 \ 1 1 11 11 ---------- - I` I __ --- --- 4 2 %\\ k k 1 � I \ 12 ciflLors 1 I 1 L 5 -- -- - — -- — -- �� - --------- o' Iw zoo' aoo' / p o -z zmz+ onmrmmw 6,V/05... . o m Liberty at 'rWfnW�LY♦w IY�)MYYF�TeM��Y1 I ]ele/�eY Y �IYI�• e.r lwsre Yer. 6�� Creek Side s'� Man LOWN�CiC7UNIT£iLX�S vew Yee. Qmm a lEmslh I SCANNED I i WAS a, � Ile: •- ♦ I- \ UM19191 -- _= I ". 1Yi.dnY/YIw Yc ,rf�aW. Vialtisewd ewaW,rrW wa. loco.,. wa r.t� woo �r NOOa08'59*W 704.89 'v r� 1 � 1 \ 1 / 1 \ naec non LM bW.) I I S I \ I \I I PRoves I= �e Ytw•r•��IYw QrYO• �� awl I m a.aa alr wr ~ ilw-� �• r eds r �r,.wc. ew 94bi/96 u.. w 27P4 P lo' Legend eannef. aab a ammmmmmm Canoets Sdeaok Liberty at Creek Side R 0' too C -z awztanarrgtnwg I» 61VIOS tae 3 a HI pre r7 I SCANNED vevempmenc vacn II Totd SR. Am J6.012 ac. EdltHg Z klg A-2. Aq-kc df«d Res«wtion RasidntM hf S Density (4-8.1-) EdMg n, yy pyl PAVond Zwklg Rmdmflal Medlvm 0ms8Y -POD Toa PtemNr Tow9wess 98 Dolts rofd Cenedd Tomhd 48 wits — 0pry D=Wy 1.05 u,/ac -- Outlet A au. Toa F} tH9 NWt 0.90 aam '\ Tea Ane 27] a.es q Tea 3w .rii 9oW f..l xru Nst Dmokp" Arae 2800 acne 1 Nd D&MMY 521 m./oc Toa s7ww ua Ano 9.31 x (33x of Net) 1 Sbwt Raadear aM &fM Lacd Publk Stat ROW 2.0. \ Puwk Street - 60 R. ROW 31 R B -B 1 Prfwte Stmt 21 R B -B Prlwte Drlws 209 B -B t►ls�v swboda (mh/r.sne) 20 fl. w/soK k 15 R W/ f wk Publk ROW 2e R to back a dib PNwte sheet 20 a to bock of mrb Pdwte D,i ..Y Abwtthg Property 50 R. Wbtland Bw%« M R. 6.0 9 to flo# hg 20 ft Proposed Lot Lhe 10 ft.- Mk*`%m adt..oy L«40 aa20 ft (to nob n !) Promw 20 ft. (to -6 n mtk) �ayy W dmenakns and arw an rfw PI «° oPPr°eYnate. R.M to Me F d and supportiq data b uad lot dlma. and areas 2 AY sefbocka meawrM wWdhg stoops patios pod n desks 3 el/nleas pbttW os faarMamea h saidt cros Me camrmn kt sB be 0 ft.. Ton,fC TOl'amtrY Nomas TomorM Y/yOal Wbsteood� ofeSaHcex Inc. 7615 9 foo Lan, Soife 160 ]599 M.y. Drlw Edm RVH, MN SSJII Edm Praki% MN. 55J11 Pho s. (952) 937-5150 Phan, (952) 25J-0162 Fac (952) 9N J1.17 Far. (952) 9J7-5822 0 toct Raley O coVf.t. aNe hf hn Typical Premier Lot Typical Concord Lot lo' Legend eannef. aab a ammmmmmm Canoets Sdeaok Liberty at Creek Side R 0' too C -z awztanarrgtnwg I» 61VIOS tae 3 a HI pre r7 I SCANNED ua weatvwa Pm1O Servke Int: OUTLOTE _ _ — ...... --- 1 ------- f 1 I \ OUTLOT B I I \ 1 I Proposed 50' Abutting--' 'Property Setback Line (typ.). L - I �.111 �--�TIF:I9E�F-meq--- — W&OT C — \ \ \ _ 40' BCOD 41 Building Setback ��` / ; \ \\ ` \ / ��1 1 r 1 \ i �� \. j / \,-Grading Limits 20' BCOD �Ti-% \\ > Primary BCOD / Calculated Flood Plain Line (typ.) /y / 100' Bluff Creek --J Setback (typ.) X / : i ; Proposed 40'Wetlond--- 1 Buffer Setback (typ.) Proposed 16.5'__ --(" / Wetland Buffer (typ.) 1 � I "• k�rr.Wrrr. ` �w<r r.�w+Mr.r� I ire Ws oe.r rr s rw.. to�o TOWN &COUNTRY°HOMFS �lNmd �L57=: rrr Development Data wd Ste A,oa Je010: . E' IMV Zmhp A-; AyiNfural PYes INW E.Wft dridr Ran R..i nfkd Medfum Bawty (h6 u/a) Rvpaerd Iwdq Rwtdentiw' Medium O nwa, -PW Toby LY,Rr r16 unite O, Ds y AM un./ac Not Owii,<gab k Arq 2800 ann Nrt D.." 521 un/ Sw & Roadra). and Gfne %Wk Sbrf - 60 R ROW 31 ft B -B Pr to S t 24 & B -B Prlwte OrJ 20 R B -B Mkknum Orh , Length 20 ft (to curb ar calk) BUEs19 SNL adri (mhlnumr) Publk ROW 20 h r/Mk t 15 R. r/out rdt Pri,wfe S(rert N R ft bock wf nrb P . Orhewy 20 R fo back of nrrA Abuftk, Pr,Y w R Wetlmd Bufhr M R Bu]dk, to Bu2dk, 17 It Proaoard Lof lire 10 R To t >• Torry tl Gauntryf/orner m EfJMIR.Y�.f✓Il.W.m Wssfraotl Ro Smicsa Inc ]615 5m0mro Lane, alts IBO OrM X99 w DrW Eden Prokiq MN SSJH Edmi Prt; Prakle. Y/t SS.T11 Pharre (952) 25J-0�8T Pome: (952) 9J] -5I50 Far. (952) 911 Fac (952) 9J]-5622 OJ Contxt Ke,in w+ Confacb OhrM YaNrl Legend cdno-err an k duty = Cmoete Sitlerdk Liberty at Creek Side t9m,anr,.vka m wa. or BS/OB/06 w 1 to 1 Freliminiary Sketch Plan X 120• 16 0' 60' t9m,anr,.vka m wa. or BS/OB/06 w 1 to 1 Freliminiary Sketch Plan r.e 1. ses NOOPOBr59'W 704.89 / !3h * ryb. I \ / I j 1 1 \ 1 / I 1 \ `�1 J Cy 1 \ /Wee, 1 7 -_.2 V Development Data I Tofol Me Ana 36.012 ac. A-2• Agrkulturel Resuwtkn 4 imlrp o� Eadeflq f1Ytle Plen Rn tkf Medium 0mvty -P00 Reposed ZMA09 I 1 1 Told Re,"Aw Tane.ee 1 IV / //1 Told Cattcwd Towed m ! units Ot.a1 O.WNY NOOPOBr59'W 704.89 / !3h * ryb. I \ / I j 1 1 \ 1 / I 1 \ `�1 J Cy 1 \ /Wee, 1 7 -_.2 V Development Data I Tofol Me Ana 36.012 ac. A-2• Agrkulturel Resuwtkn 4 imlrp Resi mUel Nedvm OmsltY (hB u/a) Eadeflq f1Ytle Plen Rn tkf Medium 0mvty -P00 Reposed ZMA09 I Told Re,"Aw Tane.ee 96 unite Told Cattcwd Towed m ! units Ot.a1 O.WNY 4.05 un./ac _ OwW A aei aces Teed EAefh9 ago arm TOM W.00W m Ano Z77 aces Tow Jae slope 1.47 ow Yet OnWhpebAs Am 2100 sues Not O.IOY 521 un./oc Totd Mp.thoe Arm an ac (JIR of Net) Sbwl Roodwo .Id 0000W Lop PuNk Street ROW 2N °G Publk stmt - 60 H. ROW JI H. 6-8 Prlwte Street 24 Y. B -B Rtwte 0me- 20 R B -B NMq sefberAs (arlthl.ln) 20 N. wlN R 15 N. -/-I me' P.Wk ROW 24 H fa badr of awb Priwte SNeef 20 R ro b.0 of cwb Priwfe Onwmy 50 fL Abutthy Pr9pmy 40 Y. fttf d Buffer 20 2 O4Ah9 to 8u1Cn9 Puposad Lot Lire 10 R.• Yithw-II LYMwoY Lm9U 10 k (to cvlb a mBY) R.n 20 R (ta axD u w04) tk Yoraet 1MDl. otn s to the Fhd end p/en are opprouLm 1. 1M let embme ne end mms en thY Raf erparth9 data Iu exact Lot mesr *and mm, 2 A/ setbacks mmsned eldu&V -torp Wke. Purhes or derie. S .Unless Wafted ee tomho w h ehkh case the co,,mm lot wN be 0 ff. . 1)� Tom end Cwntry Home- 191N...V.TO! Nb-tmod Rafe-simal Se"ice; h4 1615 Smelma Len4 Slits 160 Mg Eden P21'IW Wt55314 Eden praN4 UN 55J44 phyrW. (952) 9J7-5150 Phmc (952) 253-0162 Fac (952) 911-3437 Fmc (951) 931-5622 (9 C f.t. Kenn LYm- C. Lane Nodvl Typical Premier Lot Typical Concord Lot 10' 'X``-CdaletW oboe vwn un (trP) I CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAR 0 1 2006 \ CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT I \I .„OrmaWebe�el Lrkra Mc Yr..q meq e„r yrWe �tl aeer�rBar „rw wwrrrw r�-r„rruo vmu �� tom„ wxaW Bmau W...w �_ TOWNFzCo M.H1 Nm I To' to. Legend Cmuete CwD t LLffs Cmuefe Sidewo& Liberty at Creek Side N LL_T_ o• 1 W' zoo' Soo' 12 3VJ1rmIFEUI.a'eG o.e 6/!7/05 !fee 3 a 10 rary Plat ;CANNED 02005 w.eM Prof..dond SS m I 1 I I J 1 I �� Ea I■■II.■i ��N�l� �lN�N� �It3� oo II � — �\ r +!' ■■lj��liiil i�� ■ill■■ i�ii�ii no (Boom ■ Imass F' E _ opus OIL My My wa.s v Imo._ 1 I � I_ _ _ _ — — _ . — . — — lwrw—or ��rwl� Muulv�v� ArrIOwfw+gwBWmudIT rr.rr+r.R Wr�.wa.'.or..o.�r O•!Y 11rY TQWNY C� wLWWy Hary 1♦♦@ilY iar!< ��O—�V/4Y CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAR 0 1 2006 CHANHASSEN PANNING DEPT Liberty at Creek Side Cdl 48 H.. Wf digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T. City Nw 851-45{-0002 W. Tdl Free 1-800-252-1166 X o' too' zoo' wo• p2 z 107'9 m.M o.t 6/17/05 bre 4 w 10 site Plan SCANNED / / / / / lwrw—or ��rwl� Muulv�v� ArrIOwfw+gwBWmudIT rr.rr+r.R Wr�.wa.'.or..o.�r O•!Y 11rY TQWNY C� wLWWy Hary 1♦♦@ilY iar!< ��O—�V/4Y CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAR 0 1 2006 CHANHASSEN PANNING DEPT Liberty at Creek Side Cdl 48 H.. Wf digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T. City Nw 851-45{-0002 W. Tdl Free 1-800-252-1166 X o' too' zoo' wo• p2 z 107'9 m.M o.t 6/17/05 bre 4 w 10 site Plan SCANNED °2005 %1.tr111 Pro4es_rci 5<+_�, Construction Plans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES .x.ren�c�rm, 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Praire, Minnesota 55344 Contact: Kevin Clark Phone: (952) 253-0462 Fax: (952) 9443437 Prepared by. `M. Westwood Professional Services, Inc )599 Aru9 Dna Fon Rank MN SSW Phan. M -937 -SIN FUC 152432-512] Project number: 20021071.00 Contact: Chris Moehrl, P.E. VICINITY MAP wr ro S C1Ty OF RECEIVED SSEN JUL 1 12006 CNgNNASSEN PLANW O DEPT N0. I DATE INDEX ter N0. DESCltEnION 1 2 COVER EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY PUT 4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN _ 5 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 7 PRELIMINARY TREE INVENTORY PUN 6 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PUN 9 PRELIMINARY DETAILS 10 PRELIMINARY STREET PROFlLES VICINITY MAP wr ro S C1Ty OF RECEIVED SSEN JUL 1 12006 CNgNNASSEN PLANW O DEPT N0. I DATE I REVERON I 1 02/03/06 Revisions Per City Comments ALL 2 04/06/06 Plan Change 1,3-10 3 07/11/06 Site Layout Change (WRV) 1,3-9 Construction Plans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side CMM3avi, 3assaal Date 06MAIS Slime t of 10 ft,, We Proleee d swvk •Inc N �J i l eVp 1hI�;f °Y - r � ¢ � v��..� .�• ,, fir^ r *' � I o A,A / N00 -08.59-W 74238 I 1 N00.OB'S9'W 70491 i /Y:/t/�RACT B YYestwoodPrdessionalServices,Inc. LEGEND I • cartm..rs rvfr! ..n, m p ' `' I� LCmLKVe rAEI c ,w ® �� I I f ,Y, � (yyy M. I• I IIw:fIIYN1M rc fII-prd0]JIrJ�I�•re.Y is da 02,'Ok" It.� R •f.� N 4 � N / / O IMP a / ,w. eu. ® a / W / cmc ns] p, /JJmruc em ® ¢W10'SM' .fll py GAF Vxw ® oleic rve¢r 6 xl[wAvr 1 m cis ,ssn �` = i t n orf -- 1 1 arcs a' d /ro11CR P¢!E v r l eVp 1hI�;f °Y - r � ¢ � v��..� .�• ,, fir^ r *' � I o A,A / N00 -08.59-W 74238 I 1 N00.OB'S9'W 70491 i /Y:/t/�RACT B YYestwoodPrdessionalServices,Inc. LEGEND I • cartm..rs rvfr! ..n, m atc¢rc ,n,w ' `' I� LCmLKVe rAEI c ,w ® �� I I or• a ,Y, [Een InY41Ir s1M (yyy M. I• I IIw:fIIYN1M rc fII-prd0]JIrJ�I�•re.Y is da 02,'Ok" It.� R •f.� Im Legal Description as .—I Ou>fr ur a. xvY"wt amW vI Ss[(M 16, rmmNb //a amy 23 Nr romr (A} .VSU CmmerAp vl av Swawd mms w s . 24 rv.n.M1p rra MmT fS awm rump Na.a m WrM lae J¢ Mt eemm n e anapnr iM ro e rent m ae sauce searM ¢+a ar ma Wan JD Me [ml w tln Smarl m� al aM/ Wfbl' a..a Ikef JD M( ro aaw sa„a.ve wms w mlr Smtw oia wme d iwwM e..D a w.s-mn..a rr. n .wa...l emr vr.sa s«am L1 rv..rlb rra HmDa u Arw e.Dw,aD d w ra.aw � w a. Ice-a.m( w.�es or I". In.awx a..fr er Wfw 24 romreb ns ua.a d eq. u ewe a... ,eau •r •n ia.r.-wef� acWn sx ebfoav d GOo /s! ro fnwr fanfy HavO rIn r4 amw M a/vg ae iwa /we \ w MI Cos CunfY HwO II^ I. v ifma+ a/ ffi Mt amca ruW fe ae wnvnm(ppp pgfs-ptxrlr awM n3) M( fv a rMf 16 Mf npM yr M. r( -.wt \p,vt�-y.la, ,.wA+ u» d a. wu.a.f cw(e w .aa sanm x amn Ixet a armm d x rw ro as aw(.-Dwr� slog c+.c amm .wa o usrmn w x Me ro pam w .asba^v 1�d ro rwr� m rmn a) IXO:TT.' aaf pYf e! rixf A MM MI fml.`IY vl IM• 1 enroll 4lac IJp (. Lbnmendg of as .vM yeYs mvs OI wy Sefin M' alse M wr m uinva e/ DT Myws % mhvlu IJ +lama• dmD fM awa Hla w eatl ssllm 2. 51 /e- Mr fv / at raFf a/ OylvMp v/lin I (v b sucbW 1M+n m m d yr Apr % mYUM Il vm6 In .J66.11 Mt amw m m mirwM d 1]DN bqr® 3/ nrYUN ¢] eviA b .iR Mt anv m m rmrwa eI ]SS Ap.n 16 mMs N a.mA b mr.n /..t a.un m m min.a d ere syr ae axuM sJ e.ama a e¢eH nw a u raaf m a. ra H.. w.aia xpa..w amts w a. iwa...l ager me v... t•madap me qtr aer paf v/ rnc(e MM tla Nva alerry uM Sma�(p4 1.2 I e.pea n.n. IM 2 fwbMfy an pWmr d MMr awvW aEes xrr. m� or m a wa Me w rM Np61 MI d W Nyawar ap+p w r _vfbn b S. I MI fv IM pMr w bwviq d lM 2 a M e..vsRC a..n m m varves ar re syr m m++,fr %.cmA /e Hm MC amav mFwa w =)'A" .3 mYVHv 37 exert b .1219] Mt Mn m m minva w /p3 Ayw Ip mids Iv- J51. ]5 Mt anm m m mina d W alpw 23 siyb 3. aem�A b 31¢ W Mf ma I"se tmvLroHg TeTar .ice .1y5( e/ av�m nfMW N aH OeYn Lbw1 I)—t W Mon, rwmf fv Am. an..aY vmwr Aro+ e-Ds-2➢m H ,N• zao• Jam• o -z zoonanrxror ¢xe o.c 6/17/0.5 s.c 2 ae ]0 Liberty at Creek Side - g>�g Iona flom/ I Survey lBeesof• LEGEND I • cartm..rs rvfr! ..n, m atc¢rc ,n,w ' `' I� LCmLKVe rAEI c ,w ® rlEO1llC YANKIL I I ,Y, xfnAro Q swrwar uAriuc I• I SIf4/MLiD PoSr ® GrOI 6A%I r m. aI M 4 sd-mAmcpn[n a loan tw sand IMP ® ,w. eu. ® nmr rAw�nlf _/3 _ _ c cmc ns] p, /JJmruc em ® ¢W10'SM' .fll py GAF Vxw ® oleic rve¢r 6 xl[wAvr 1 m cis ,ssn �` D[u n orf -- 1 1 arcs d /ro11CR P¢!E v r Ixmuws naf IM \ f3fCw 6tl= O Awt_ W M Yv.mnf \ \ • ower_ came im u..anen( \ V go �\ VICE -4M MA Im Legal Description as .—I Ou>fr ur a. xvY"wt amW vI Ss[(M 16, rmmNb //a amy 23 Nr romr (A} .VSU CmmerAp vl av Swawd mms w s . 24 rv.n.M1p rra MmT fS awm rump Na.a m WrM lae J¢ Mt eemm n e anapnr iM ro e rent m ae sauce searM ¢+a ar ma Wan JD Me [ml w tln Smarl m� al aM/ Wfbl' a..a Ikef JD M( ro aaw sa„a.ve wms w mlr Smtw oia wme d iwwM e..D a w.s-mn..a rr. n .wa...l emr vr.sa s«am L1 rv..rlb rra HmDa u Arw e.Dw,aD d w ra.aw � w a. Ice-a.m( w.�es or I". In.awx a..fr er Wfw 24 romreb ns ua.a d eq. u ewe a... ,eau •r •n ia.r.-wef� acWn sx ebfoav d GOo /s! ro fnwr fanfy HavO rIn r4 amw M a/vg ae iwa /we \ w MI Cos CunfY HwO II^ I. v ifma+ a/ ffi Mt amca ruW fe ae wnvnm(ppp pgfs-ptxrlr awM n3) M( fv a rMf 16 Mf npM yr M. r( -.wt \p,vt�-y.la, ,.wA+ u» d a. wu.a.f cw(e w .aa sanm x amn Ixet a armm d x rw ro as aw(.-Dwr� slog c+.c amm .wa o usrmn w x Me ro pam w .asba^v 1�d ro rwr� m rmn a) IXO:TT.' aaf pYf e! rixf A MM MI fml.`IY vl IM• 1 enroll 4lac IJp (. Lbnmendg of as .vM yeYs mvs OI wy Sefin M' alse M wr m uinva e/ DT Myws % mhvlu IJ +lama• dmD fM awa Hla w eatl ssllm 2. 51 /e- Mr fv / at raFf a/ OylvMp v/lin I (v b sucbW 1M+n m m d yr Apr % mYUM Il vm6 In .J66.11 Mt amw m m mirwM d 1]DN bqr® 3/ nrYUN ¢] eviA b .iR Mt anv m m rmrwa eI ]SS Ap.n 16 mMs N a.mA b mr.n /..t a.un m m min.a d ere syr ae axuM sJ e.ama a e¢eH nw a u raaf m a. ra H.. w.aia xpa..w amts w a. iwa...l ager me v... t•madap me qtr aer paf v/ rnc(e MM tla Nva alerry uM Sma�(p4 1.2 I e.pea n.n. IM 2 fwbMfy an pWmr d MMr awvW aEes xrr. m� or m a wa Me w rM Np61 MI d W Nyawar ap+p w r _vfbn b S. I MI fv IM pMr w bwviq d lM 2 a M e..vsRC a..n m m varves ar re syr m m++,fr %.cmA /e Hm MC amav mFwa w =)'A" .3 mYVHv 37 exert b .1219] Mt Mn m m minva w /p3 Ayw Ip mids Iv- J51. ]5 Mt anm m m mina d W alpw 23 siyb 3. aem�A b 31¢ W Mf ma I"se tmvLroHg TeTar .ice .1y5( e/ av�m nfMW N aH OeYn Lbw1 I)—t W Mon, rwmf fv Am. an..aY vmwr Aro+ e-Ds-2➢m H ,N• zao• Jam• o -z zoonanrxror ¢xe o.c 6/17/0.5 s.c 2 ae ]0 Liberty at Creek Side - g>�g Iona flom/ I Survey lBeesof• Westrwd Professional 6e om Inc. • J. \ �s+r orl ' I I .a. doge lk pp.m ,a.la ,swe Wmitimood / / N00008'59'W 742.33 rl N00008'59'W 704.89 3^- / ry 1 t 1 1 1 \ tieee aur (R3 I I \ I \I r.e..r 4;w vm easesfac moi. Y_.rY�ArIY_ \YY.M1 O..ab Nee W1UA* �m 33 TOWN & GOOUNTRY HOMES Development Data II Tatd Ste b 36.013 ac Ex , 21neh9 A-2. A9rimlturd Presenotim I ExWthy oul P Reeidmtwl Medium Density (4-8 u/o) P Py Zonky I Residential kfedium Omsify -PUD rofd Pronler ToeManes 98 untfe rotd Can°°rd TewM . 48 mlte Otso1 OenMty 4.05 m./«. LW110 A 0u «res \\\ Totd Exlathq ft 0.90 arae Tofei Mtrdmd M!G Arsa Z77. I Tofd .TOi Sapee 1.47 ayes Net Dei c w. Areo 2800 arae I NO Denslfy 521 m./M Toed hpaeNove Argo 8.97 x (MM of Net) 1 Sbeek RmdeoN •N &f1m, L«d Public sheet RDW 2M « Public Sheet - 60 R ROW 31 a B -B t Pdwte Sheet 24 R. B -B Privet. Oriws ZO ft. B -B a -#AV S -N d (mhinum) Public ROW 20 ft. w/e G 15 & w/«t xdk Pwwfe Street 20 ft fo badt or curb (ercgrt Porkhy cnmen) Pnwte U'h "Y 20 ftto bark of amb Abutthg Property 50 ft. Wetlmd But 40 N Bu/dhy to Buddmg 17 M Proposed Lot Lhe 10 ft.• Aftele n Drhmmy Lal9tli Premie 20 lE (to curb w nota) Cmcmd edk) 20 2 (fo art mMla 1. fie lot dmmsims and areas m Mie plop m vp,roxbnafe. Raw fa the Fnd and eupparth9 data fa err«f lot S.neneions and meas. 2. M setbacks ..eared eedudhg at« .. patios, paehes m decks J. Mfnless platted os toeMmee h .hx case Me m Mm lot eW be 0 ft. . nffVAZAMM Toem and Country Nares West.00d Profeselmd Seticas, Inc, 7615 Smtma Lme. Sifts I80 7599 Aee9 a Edm Pre . W 55344 Edon Prone. MN. 55311 Pllmc (952) 253-062 Phme (952) 937-5150 Far. (952) 944-343] For (952) 937-3822 Confact: Rerfn park Cmtcct Chris Moehrf Typical Premier Lot Typical Concord Lot t0 Legend Cmcrete Curb R Cutfe- Cmoete sidewalk Liberty at Creek Side t0' to, 0' C-2 zmzlonerrm ora pale 6/17/05 ebme 3 oT 10 Preliminary Plat r FR Tree Detan _ see a ee... a..e i M raw 'A-�✓..�.r.r:ad II ■ I I -I / A... Netes see sew qua Planting Notes Cmvo<ler Nal porde[ me per a,. L lee of all Plant t. alas 1N• gaarantn Mglne on Ne aa!< of Ne LanGcepe Maillect'a a OmOi Mltn lyam yomlee,-m , , Replarnnl peel .... eR Y a- Ma e • 9 up>'. ,,'mins. NI Mea. to ee eenYnq pose, Yeingoto-ryom me/a naaY 5a•rlrin gaae anal afire to. Wt k rot rnttM cap. Ne ab<inq atenewoc m Mon f aeon be ked M1an [:same vglc .weer. eons. enc NI Ment. NM be M1q has notknele papa, nap, a aelaml. NI Mon. <FOA as hes kern ..m a aeoe MonN- NI•Nal I -e Mary. halter bmd'nq ma 1.. Canllawa . N<Y mase m estWi l,. man MW V ase a belief's .tate Mb N-. Nm S3 PTaab b m«t Amalva sten. for Naar seen (A19 WI -1.) nai, m4 M eke ma tps seedbed. Reeb to M nslabd as pa elands[ AN51 vlmYnq Watt w UM mFMum 12• Mane plmin9 MJ' be . sed 6' n eMWa (tides And toot. err NW). Bent sods la M e<MFg lm M M1an ale see of ooh.loge sem me Y.A..Yep+ assn., aw cage ...e.. Can4 awe erlfy lowtim• ails as atm. por to ...1.6- of 0-1. Sbmq el nw mlbna: rmatkn. Hume and alae IF trot 0. am me Y•a. Map as wawa,-hmead Nwa - fa ort tee and bottan. Ranow by " I. Open tee of term an M matelac -- pea w Potted Manes fact And baa spat peal pots Rune Mmb as necessary - W etmdmd curvy psatim and to coned pow dares,, Rants as be MnaBNar ended upon ann s of tlla Rmely Ma -F twine If nwropy, lempawy mlr. M ne. wad 1e, be aeddeY udm oMereh• roleY: M to M a. YYn•mla gases and Atldr MVYaq anm Aa ed aO ares be eyaM .IM 4- M tomes and NM to arses assists and anape *asap•. seep of 3.1 or gnats NW M elos* Pap neap of auded Nadeaall WY mbl •Nes M use! wend al Nae elan wn me. Aff no elastin mad (NaNin moose sen) saes Mae eed bmiw fablt d• of aveMd baa maim and vaMrFe. Econ IMnmd (w [quad) Wap deny TM seems mal be Mad .IU caro ww and At Isom S hwn Me mtaa of ewlgeee Irem Utpi.e aro< and NMMIrs for dgsq <bas daqua. Cmons a sal amts! a - stab 'me cm' (dst-ds<-aooz w !]1-252-t 168) w'wllf, cam.. of Nun., -ad amnia .Yelua isooti n of plbal massa . v ls'l to ryM and see anataat No "Its, N M FstJd mel of 'ad, and cons bn bee Mon mMetd in the ass e6Na sea Gnhnta fel reel nearlyale aYm Man st 0-1 mmalaa vols me i N AsY moist[ ed v Rebs s mea 's emdamn (hnss <N mel MCXe sale fa CmbMe, Raafds ngallm to a Manel - m ets. MYplim eA e. Mapl/b..1 by leee bad n, Goband on nfamalXn deal Yulaalim ane tllaniYq <m be aetand ban fidaa Cmlraela. Ramer. reek.. w Weeds W/nd As lvlyd fa my rodwy bwMvd dpcwt to 8r W *Meed *ane-anaiim. Resat as senses to Wapaly hwn Manias maatlm. 0 no cal to ems. Re Mmt maters v tvAlatern sY M wvptd seem mp.ow Is rgald a me ice lova wannl by ds• Landscape Omander Wb to f mossio l of fel bb sad/w quotatin Shrub Detail �VEStWOIXIR'OIKSIOfId�$BfVICM,�f1C. y593 AIa.Vela Orme Flsoosa 4.Y37=w 14gM:5nsnstsp Pee assaTays ��_ wee-.�-�- I n�awrraf.frader. w�- �r ser I l� � rVpAn Mt WVt.aau MWN&I IT welW e. aria M -al T/Yaf _ lYie. -e Y ee N cess _ 4al =w_aa._ OeIB 8f aOLa�aN�_w�le4w�1 I �� 1� I Lrir V/nN a-4�r yss 1.S -1S F.FAfAFDd et Plant List F -W red Gdwpale / Mune < A-- F 'SprYap t5 1.5• BB CODE ON. CGYCM/DOTMY MN E IM OxLRRSTQiT lig Palmae, Ase / rrnNue aaneMpina 'Pa"on 1S -1S 66 ® pan Mantas S w Meaner /Acer --an 'peon Mamtaa • 1.S -1S F.FAfAFDd et Rea Oat / Oran des 1.6•-15• BB %,.. XmMaonl / (deaitw rrixmuq ear. "is tapas' 1.T -1T 9B a.-,Lndan / TW analcma Redmond 15-15• BB ® x..wa RM Mad. / Aw rvemm 'fa ll -a 1.5-16. 66 5XNU65 74 6v Ods /Orem[ an.. I.r-ss• w MIAMfMTAI 5e F -W red Gdwpale / Mune < A-- F 'SprYap t5 1.5• BB SyM1p Am Gaaapge / Maue < Sow' Ccce,aw ..M / Uatsy. wad -gall 1.5. 6B Japans I- U- / S~ adico.to 13• BB ® Mims &Aima SselMarY / AmamUNr . ax ifaro 'Aawmn 6rNlmv t.Y W F.FAfAFDd et eaY Xu $uaR mwa aswlo 6'-Y 6'-g 6 so. Pne/PYee nigra Wa Wo peen !ip-as / P. W W- EM,ta Ste, PM / P. .0.1. fi-6' BB TMny Arematn / n )3 eelnnta s 'TxM f 6'-e' 66 5XNU65 74 Iglu oognwd / C s .tamnaa iemtr w Pot Rea Teygea pq.wa/ Carse wMm MY•N ]6' Pet M. Pol Nae'�amry Munwa, Ybmm�n ImIW^ uMman as. 'Wnp Id 2e• Pot Genese! AmWcm 6marr)aual Wnna^ / peoy fiuNr XmepuMe / 51wMlo Imivo 24• Pot rwe / rumw. maws 'CernPxNi O.vf Ntngrl Eumy-,e 2. at 20 Pa NOl WANUTIO M PtAN AIPERSFDE UW WANTT1IES M ME ET£NT C! A p:#SPM'C' R T V110M.1i ME ,,NAW AT "as MA111RTT ,JW WiTFR IEOIAIITEMT TI RT WMlllr6 AIE RISIECIFA Is nE RANT UST ANO A16: NOT SEPMAM pUNn1 19 Buffer B.Ogat senbomb MdWm Density Adjacent to Read Buff. Yard Requtamnt •8• (City Ordirwnce) 20 Canopy Trap per 100' 1F of Buffs 4.0 Undesdary / Omamental Treed pr 100' LF of BUNs 6.0 Sllnbe per 100 V of w1fr T. Rewind 707.31 LF / 100 IF - 7.07 7.02 z 20 - 14.14 Ovendry Tran 7.07 • 4.9 - 2&W Undrelary / prlmramtd T- 7.07 s 6.0 - 42.42 9lfubs Trap Pronided 9 Onnta, Tom 5 8' E.er9reen Tress IT Onomntal Tnas 11 6' E.a ,. Trees 42 Shrubs NoT 31. D, FHROIRNS Pexas D M 1M5 IS IssoEA AI. 8' TALL an OF EMArAEO15 PRONRn as Aps 16 BIIREn AM 8' . XY Buffer Requirements Modlum Density Adjacent to Road Buhr Yard ResuYement '9" (City admancd) 0.6 Canopy Trees par 100' LF of Buff. 1.6 Undentory / Omamnlal Trees pr 100' LF of BURS 2.4 Shrubs ps 100 LF of 9uffr Tram Required 494.66 1F / 100 lF - 4.95 4.95 A 0.5 - 3.96 Ovral,, Trap 495 x 1.6 = 7.92 Undrstary / Ornalnnlel T- 4.95 s 2.4 - 11.66 WObe Trap prattled 4 pYnetory Tram 9 6' EAs9rarl Trans 12 URdenlwy Trees 9 C Esest area Tram 32 SMuba MOIE4 = OF, EE£IN'i6D15 ,s(yND N nR .V AtiER NE a TAL Bog 6 fl9ROREfM 1,1110,01:40) N 116 .5V 11LITI ll APE r TALL a' 100' 200 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION c -z znzldnPlPm oAc Liberty at oebe 06/17/OS f9Mr 6 w 10 Creek Side UPreliminary Plan 21 1; NFEW Simon '� _1■n�� `��Y pJii �•�II��-. Ij�� '•! �IIE�ii uPER !Mtjl ;:II`�l ; :,' � ,,. :.• .,.. n�d11H �- n � n iiJy�Ilp Jii�•C;�:T:G iii !ltii iii ti n n dIIM Ji i•�■ qi .pis 1••ii ii �1 E�ii IIIr�r7I ii��IlE.�•i :•R'�� + 3 /I Y a3y � ft ♦ ..P i i1• Ell r JJJJJ� JJ. •IMIIMIMMMI < �, • • • • • • Went. Profaa.ianal SWMcea, 9.10.p Nef/e He $11. s.Eml:e m.m ,am mwe.mml ar m.w m ar T.mm an xl>ml m.N mmTN e..� A' um r .m rm.ial r.e n...mm R•�aMee. eaaa.T. ua. CfTY OFST cauai� F L 2-07 [(100 TYPICAL LOCAL STREET SECTION "° (31' BACK TO BACK) 4 - � REFER TO PLAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS k E%ACT SIDEWALK LOCATION XY ROW m�m b' ROM ORAMACE Q UTRITY EAgLENT /T - MALT 3]30 LVAQSaaIB .FAR CdIRY KIT SPEa. 1ST B,11AflWB TA LWT - MAOT x35a LNiRIIO]M BAY CdRY - ClASS S /AME m RAM I= CR19ED SlplE MOOT Mo{ 4 m gtMgAM BARROW TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECITON (W BACK TO BACK) WRLW I/T MOAT 4 x LWEWCIM E M VT 9EC LLA RIUEpl15 TM L T MOOT 9EG Lba L'MBSWM MY GVYIH IMA! AC Sll, M4 4 ,MF OCBIFO SILTE .CYEal3 MS ' IIri00f 4EL a{L70 41EC! 9WRlM WWMOY 1I6•m OIBIl1IQ PL PIAN VEW Fdt SP£CEIC i0R SNNYAIK I Wxres�mxewA+atNrwlmw. oo„somad ll deisaal ervie, Inc rmT=ra=.-, ==* -T ("tlm �r.1q4 IRmMi I Irxpra ll< Tmmy:pxNM1T1 NC TIItlAiR] rT yT. rxw. OIY mnTM ISM. 4NO MOTE ....� ......�.. .mr a e,z 1 aME aortia avu s= r,EE M .aos. aaos. rno¢ rxA oroLu lunrswao:rs alxll xxvL coax saE coxr.cr lAY BIAMEIS La641Y MD ST.IE M W WT TO N m MELT CMTM TIM TYPICAL FRIVATE DRIVB/STR C, D, B SECTION (24' BACK TO BACIO TTY, a = B vo.W C" 1-1/Y MAOT SEG lX0 LVE]OWfIB TEM WM9E Ilpaf 9PEC 215x BIIIYENS TM CWT Y MDaf !4l xJla LWKSC%9 BhY CP.R9E r MOOT 9EG x21, n.« 0. taaW waWEn SipE AOWEWff BAY x{ MOOT SPFC aM.1A YlECf WMAM XNNB NiKED 9A>t.M NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side IAT NERCHM o -x z4Y31onolPol.oTa O.Ta 06/17/05 r 9 w 10 /i i/rb•. - GG_G: Err' �� •:�"R" PL PIAN VEW Fdt SP£CEIC i0R SNNYAIK I Wxres�mxewA+atNrwlmw. oo„somad ll deisaal ervie, Inc rmT=ra=.-, ==* -T ("tlm �r.1q4 IRmMi I Irxpra ll< Tmmy:pxNM1T1 NC TIItlAiR] rT yT. rxw. OIY mnTM ISM. 4NO MOTE ....� ......�.. .mr a e,z 1 aME aortia avu s= r,EE M .aos. aaos. rno¢ rxA oroLu lunrswao:rs alxll xxvL coax saE coxr.cr lAY BIAMEIS La641Y MD ST.IE M W WT TO N m MELT CMTM TIM TYPICAL FRIVATE DRIVB/STR C, D, B SECTION (24' BACK TO BACIO TTY, a = B vo.W C" 1-1/Y MAOT SEG lX0 LVE]OWfIB TEM WM9E Ilpaf 9PEC 215x BIIIYENS TM CWT Y MDaf !4l xJla LWKSC%9 BhY CP.R9E r MOOT 9EG x21, n.« 0. taaW waWEn SipE AOWEWff BAY x{ MOOT SPFC aM.1A YlECf WMAM XNNB NiKED 9A>t.M NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side IAT NERCHM o -x z4Y31onolPol.oTa O.Ta 06/17/05 r 9 w 10 o.uw wac-uuo rronseanm SarNceq Inc LME r 37+62.42 LP. E -862.16 LP. STA - 42+21.76 PM STA - 42+30 PM E - 882.00 A.D. - 1.46 K - 61.54 W, w n + n Y S CRAx (TyPJ MADE (T .) 30+00 PM STA - 32+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 PN ELEV - 898.95 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 AD. - -1.25 µ+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 .iTi m I PN STA - 50' VC PM = 886.98 BM -9-5.40 1 y K - 30.00 A0.D. � n K S $ 1 2OW W I 1 LP. EIEV - 875.80 N q >n p LP. STA - 16+95.75 c PM STA - 14+84.53 PM STA - 18+17.68 i g n PM ELEV - 875.00 + m' A.D. - 6.40. AD. - 7A0 K - 37.50 LME r 37+62.42 LP. E -862.16 LP. STA - 42+21.76 PM STA - 42+30 PM E - 882.00 A.D. - 1.46 K - 61.54 W, w n + n Y S CRAx (TyPJ MADE (T .) 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 µ+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 A.D. - -4.00 STREET A K - 30.00 PM STA - 8+90 PM ELEV - 909,63 AD. - -1.00 K = 90.33 '+uu L+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 PRIVATE STREET C H.P. EEEV - 88863 H.P. STA - 50+17.15 PM STA - 50+20 PM ELEV - SM73 A.D. - -2110 K - 20.00 Md m m00 l iJ� �iiGY"' �- I ar/a�i 4W�v-os�Y m ra or OIAkJ06 u. w 40W 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+IA PRIVATE STREET D 0.,T W AM �w �Ipn O p � 1 r 4T H" W..W DAMN ff" M..00 Wl 48 Haus befar4 digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Teh Gly Area 651-454-0002 Mn. TW Fr44 1-800-252-1166 PM STA = 22+86.24 PM EIEY - 891.89 K - 19.91 PM STA - 23+26.24 PM ELEV - 889.69 A.D. 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 STREET B nota mr3,4�50 PM STA - 11+91.67 Vkstwood mu ismzim H.P. EEEV - 88863 H.P. STA - 50+17.15 PM STA - 50+20 PM ELEV - SM73 A.D. - -2110 K - 20.00 Md m m00 l iJ� �iiGY"' �- I ar/a�i 4W�v-os�Y m ra or OIAkJ06 u. w 40W 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+IA PRIVATE STREET D 0.,T W AM �w �Ipn O p � 1 r 4T H" W..W DAMN ff" M..00 Wl 48 Haus befar4 digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Teh Gly Area 651-454-0002 Mn. TW Fr44 1-800-252-1166 PM STA = 22+86.24 PM EIEY - 891.89 K - 19.91 PM STA - 23+26.24 PM ELEV - 889.69 A.D. 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 60+011 61+00 62+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+o0. 17+DD 15+OD PRIVATE STREET E STREET F NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION s w •. ,r ITA Liberty at Creek Side cbmh4eren. A4imeeole o-3 xooAonolroz Dre 061V105 a 1() w 30 STREET B PM STA - 11+91.67 PM ELEV - 897.50 A.D. - -4.00 K - 30.00 12(Y K I LP. EIEV - 875.80 LP. STA - 16+95.75 c PM STA - 14+84.53 PM STA - 18+17.68 PM ELEV - 871.00 PM ELEV - 875.00 + m' A.D. - 6.40. AD. - 7A0 K - 37.50 K = 3816 1 > 24V W 1 I 290' W- 1 n n 1 m d � \ C m + ^ m r ??1 60+011 61+00 62+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+o0. 17+DD 15+OD PRIVATE STREET E STREET F NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION s w •. ,r ITA Liberty at Creek Side cbmh4eren. A4imeeole o-3 xooAonolroz Dre 061V105 a 1() w 30 °2005 �. t. E Prvf.w d SRNCes, Nc. Construction flans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: 1811 J TOWN &i COUNTRY HOb4E5 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Praire, Minnesota 55344 Contact: Kevin Clark Phone: (952) 253-0462 Fax (952) 9443437 Prepared by. w Westwood Professional Services, Inc ]$99 Mugran DIM lhfs. 6s1553M enl:fl3-!ir•!1W Fm 953-931-Mlil Project number: 20021071.00 Contact: Chris Moehrl, P.E. VICINITY MAP .r m Scor 4-7 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT NO. IVDU Samar NO. D®C6Sf1oN 1 COVER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 5 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 7 PRELIMINARY TREE INVENTORY PLAN BPRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 9 PRELIMINARY DETAILS 10 1 PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES VICINITY MAP .r m Scor 4-7 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT NO. DATE RSYSM SHEUM 1 02/03/06 Revision! Per City Comments ALL 2 04/06/06 Plan Chan 1,3-10 Construction Plans for Pretimixtary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side CA.nh e , M�n Dl 06N/05 Slues 1 0f 10 704.91 B Jj WA Legal Description IM Wgvsf LYsfr b qe .—I pMr b S IW Ie, rawr/lo na N 2J (n/•n0 re nrri w mb µ ALSQ' Cmm/rWyy 1 fM $wmaf cmM e/ Se[fM 24 Ioa.+N Ila BmM 24 a-- rmr�lp Nsm m Actlm M. A MC qap h v slydD.l bx ro v pvhl m IM Dmm %fM 4ry vl aY See'ea A Mf Cal N IM Smgvsf cmrr b uY SaIM; IMn Iaf A Mf ro w sam.al aa.. b.rp aNa, ..e DNp N i.Dim+w Bvhp . m�.enr.a pM. h saM...1 �r b aNv s'.brm u rp.N.N rra XaD. n AL4R f M .wq.ml [min v/ qv Ndmvvf Q.vfr vl fM NaMvvl Welr e/ 5'pun ipa/iB I1I Nsm N_...r. e rm� rlL•n.mpy b B➢eM NMg f pro RamrpiXr uA wavDMNfYF,r mMwn w 1a4 1= M.pwp1 rnaalrI Z w..wnfMw yusfr-D.vri sun axs Mem . Dohl M Me nrq b M .wf-.wf \ wrfr-wfr �rM m. b q. xvq.wf awr. b,m sexm xq... DMi a me.� 116 Mf b (M pMfr�pafr sIM Yia fenm vyq a 6vfm[v e/ 16 Mf Iv D/vn aI MDIMD (pliM Iv MM p I f fl) FliaC tlwf pY N 1—t A vM11T Da Em1rIY eI !M 1 eappq 0/ew \I Ilp r. pnm•.uip vl q. ,vet pvlr mn. u/ qJ Svctm Ia' mwp mn .sf m vlvn✓q r sn 1p.e Y mMmv r! wema dmp m. nvM m. or vvW xefM N .13 Me m IM phf N lyMYp I Um I fa M OmNq Mmo m m O7, v/ s 51 11D 4qw mlvlp .l n1a�h b Pall M( IMp m m mYvq v/ IN lD d.Mpmfufp sv.! Id .A30 MC grace m m minuet al ]SS Cq.e I6 mhrM 10 ptmh M AI. DJ Mt M+u m m mhwq eI ]I! cp.e M mpute S) im,b b eC4H Mf m v M wvM Ih. o/ .eu NrMnpl wrfr o/ q. nrm.pl arir m➢ qry or Eras, uN Dml u/ riuel a .FM ,M xrM...e.rr me smen.pMY ., th. s •..a4n.a i.s f z bmp ApsM.D .f ESq. pehl e/ IrmhvlM er 11fi r ppvM.f Saves rant. ret wf m e minuq N DI mhvlp p smN dmp M omm IM b my IMM MI eI q1 Morusl Wvfr N ail va'fM M sx ie MI ro M. pMf v/ .�m�m �r�r (M 1 N �.v4 Y.np mDn.m v/ Ire liTs ep mtwra sD .wan to ailM/M aI XA1 aYpwv I3 miwM S) svN. M .121D1 Mf, mrrv. m m minvM M lu! Iys Cq miyfp !1 wm�1 M J31 lS Mt Mnn m m uirwq N DD lipaa 13 wivM N vvm�pv M S10.N Mf m0 qne frmhvlhg rep SIM R l N wvvp Mf h Wtt ONn OneC Oxummt Na ]10751 g t la \ Avrs ClNvsYVrntl blia F.b-T'.W. reM sM Ans xor ma o 100' 200' m C-2 M21071Ev DM Liberty at IM10,5 > 2 m 10 Creek Side � CD"`litiom/ ChwdD tI SCANNED LEGEND � IcvF[BBus m¢ rnX.alNJ M want Noor 'Y� I y �,! rcmwrs 2rtr ( AJ ® ElCLINE FAINaE • WIIMY NAWM£ I I �� I s 51EFC/Y000 PoSI ® GlW BA9/ i . la/ s SOI-pMIL/OBFB rJ rIAIiD f)O SECMW `` � �r% Ina Nw 1" FA YAl BO.Y ® 51441 YANRA£ ICSI 1ELCAM`E 6N' e DCIE Da G1E mw ® G N BOX O NK4Alrr I ' � LIS iF1ED Q D4C / 3�E SipCr uw Eu1-- POIIf1! OifNEAD II — EUY DIF — fEMF lK � PoIFB MML ZA,A.- IFQXq/S 1NEC fXL � � \\ \\ s t Dn1➢banal • AMp Fwne MWvnlmf / � Q IMWp Lbf M IIJMin1 f \�� go VICINITY MAP wl I0 SGIE WA Legal Description IM Wgvsf LYsfr b qe .—I pMr b S IW Ie, rawr/lo na N 2J (n/•n0 re nrri w mb µ ALSQ' Cmm/rWyy 1 fM $wmaf cmM e/ Se[fM 24 Ioa.+N Ila BmM 24 a-- rmr�lp Nsm m Actlm M. A MC qap h v slydD.l bx ro v pvhl m IM Dmm %fM 4ry vl aY See'ea A Mf Cal N IM Smgvsf cmrr b uY SaIM; IMn Iaf A Mf ro w sam.al aa.. b.rp aNa, ..e DNp N i.Dim+w Bvhp . m�.enr.a pM. h saM...1 �r b aNv s'.brm u rp.N.N rra XaD. n AL4R f M .wq.ml [min v/ qv Ndmvvf Q.vfr vl fM NaMvvl Welr e/ 5'pun ipa/iB I1I Nsm N_...r. e rm� rlL•n.mpy b B➢eM NMg f pro RamrpiXr uA wavDMNfYF,r mMwn w 1a4 1= M.pwp1 rnaalrI Z w..wnfMw yusfr-D.vri sun axs Mem . Dohl M Me nrq b M .wf-.wf \ wrfr-wfr �rM m. b q. xvq.wf awr. b,m sexm xq... DMi a me.� 116 Mf b (M pMfr�pafr sIM Yia fenm vyq a 6vfm[v e/ 16 Mf Iv D/vn aI MDIMD (pliM Iv MM p I f fl) FliaC tlwf pY N 1—t A vM11T Da Em1rIY eI !M 1 eappq 0/ew \I Ilp r. pnm•.uip vl q. ,vet pvlr mn. u/ qJ Svctm Ia' mwp mn .sf m vlvn✓q r sn 1p.e Y mMmv r! wema dmp m. nvM m. or vvW xefM N .13 Me m IM phf N lyMYp I Um I fa M OmNq Mmo m m O7, v/ s 51 11D 4qw mlvlp .l n1a�h b Pall M( IMp m m mYvq v/ IN lD d.Mpmfufp sv.! Id .A30 MC grace m m minuet al ]SS Cq.e I6 mhrM 10 ptmh M AI. DJ Mt M+u m m mhwq eI ]I! cp.e M mpute S) im,b b eC4H Mf m v M wvM Ih. o/ .eu NrMnpl wrfr o/ q. nrm.pl arir m➢ qry or Eras, uN Dml u/ riuel a .FM ,M xrM...e.rr me smen.pMY ., th. s •..a4n.a i.s f z bmp ApsM.D .f ESq. pehl e/ IrmhvlM er 11fi r ppvM.f Saves rant. ret wf m e minuq N DI mhvlp p smN dmp M omm IM b my IMM MI eI q1 Morusl Wvfr N ail va'fM M sx ie MI ro M. pMf v/ .�m�m �r�r (M 1 N �.v4 Y.np mDn.m v/ Ire liTs ep mtwra sD .wan to ailM/M aI XA1 aYpwv I3 miwM S) svN. M .121D1 Mf, mrrv. m m minvM M lu! Iys Cq miyfp !1 wm�1 M J31 lS Mt Mnn m m uirwq N DD lipaa 13 wivM N vvm�pv M S10.N Mf m0 qne frmhvlhg rep SIM R l N wvvp Mf h Wtt ONn OneC Oxummt Na ]10751 g t la \ Avrs ClNvsYVrntl blia F.b-T'.W. reM sM Ans xor ma o 100' 200' m C-2 M21071Ev DM Liberty at IM10,5 > 2 m 10 Creek Side � CD"`litiom/ ChwdD tI SCANNED o2005 Weste od TJ N00°OB'S9'W 74233 � ° 48.3 _ _ _ _ N00°OW59'W 704.89 -( / ''n^a.ry sroe�n u ``,. (tm.) w L a \ `___ ON 10.5' 41 lit It r I t� t `_ I I � C � \\`••• \\ r cdOaseo "sues ria. LM (t,.) I I I I I I \I I 10' 10' Legend Cmaete Curb ! Outten Concrete Sidewolk Liberty at Creek Side 10' R 0' 100' 200' Jfy C-2 10021omrrvol.nwG 1 6/17/0.5 revs 3 w 10 �ry SCANNED Yr—.wr04e, �r ". ]-Mw/rew. rr..tbr-M r.+rdr-tj sur." -==Z 4r T4r `rr—.Ma�"ute.trev .rrrw rwtr� r O� PlljQld/- I EdafF9 Zmlro A-2, A9riculturol Preservation I EA*ft add. plm Town & COUN xx t I SIM I Reaklantial Medium Density -PUD +suns iamals rYrrNlwood wwwwr+raw --_":"7 w. t1s or Mloo/G6 „�., 13011 Nw wt_ow.r tWwrt.".. 48 units 10' 10' Legend Cmaete Curb ! Outten Concrete Sidewolk Liberty at Creek Side 10' R 0' 100' 200' Jfy C-2 10021omrrvol.nwG 1 6/17/0.5 revs 3 w 10 �ry SCANNED Development Data II Told SN. Ano 76.011 ac. I EdafF9 Zmlro A-2, A9riculturol Preservation I EA*ft add. plm Rezk tld Me Density (4-5 u/a) Aq-Md Zmho Reaklantial Medium Density -PUD Told P'Veh ' Tosoll,ens. 98 units Totd concdd TOwAw'4. 48 units Owe Do,dty 4.05 Owftt A 0.4J omv Told £b.tho NYtlmda 0.90 acrea Total W*Umd Nk Aro, 2.77 acres ITold 39i 9Opo, 1.47 acrea Not DlwkpoW Ano 28.00 sacra I Not Dwlsffy 321 un./x TOf f hpwabrr. Am 9.31 oc (Mw of Net) 1 Sbwt Raedwoo m! let . \ Local Publk Street ROW 2H ac. Public 5trest - 60 H. ROW 31 H. B -B 1 Ptlwt. Street 24 H. B -B PNwte Dries 20 H. B -B BMr9 sw W s ("'Mere.) Publk ROW TO H. w/ro'4 ! 15 H. w/c°t woF P to SMeef 24 R fo bock of curb Prlwfe Driveway 20 H. to back of curb Abufth9 Property SO H. Nbtiond Bu Her 40 R. Baidr9 to Buldn9 20 H. Proposed Lot Line 10 M.- AMuun J),*—y Ldg1A 10 H. (to sub or o,k) concord 20 H. (to curt or wpdF) T. Me 1°t denerukne and anew .i MM pion ae approiwnate. Retie is Me yhd rvW si supporth9 data b exact lot dFmsn.bns and asax 2. AN setbacks measured erdudh9 sfoaps• paths, pn or OMa J .Unless patted ov townbonn. h eft' cove Me carmnon rot wL be 0 H. . Q�Om Torn and Country Names ft t. Rti�,o,d M Prohssland SerNcex Inc 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite IBO 7599 Ano n Oriw 7599 A £den Pr(952 MN 55tH kn% Eden Pr(9N, N3 SS50 257-0462 Prime: (932) Fox. Far: 9H -J437 7-5822SO Rax (f. ok K Contact: Kerte Owk Cas Moei22 Cmtacf: Lkna Ma Mr/ Typical Premier Lot Typical Concord Lot 10' 10' Legend Cmaete Curb ! Outten Concrete Sidewolk Liberty at Creek Side 10' R 0' 100' 200' Jfy C-2 10021omrrvol.nwG 1 6/17/0.5 revs 3 w 10 �ry SCANNED 02005 WWww Professional S.,.. Inc I ". WYwe111MrYal lamer. M�IIIY\IM$Y 1181. Ra1Id1! maple la�mane �1w00d aww.Ymrylme I Yelr ralY YlY�Ir�IM�fWq Mer ••_r _ ��T'IYr YI�rw Y�lW411a �M �. e�rer MaYY�Ia�� tiw IaApN{.M O�iwndUaal F � TOWNN& HUM Liberty at Creek Side Call M Homs bafine dgginy: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Tah My Neo 651-a5a-0002 Mn. Toll free 1-600-252-1156 ri 0' 100' 2W 301 C-2 X 10TWGI.ae6 Mase 6/17/0.5 r 4 a 10 Site P11 SCANNED 02005 I 11110 ~L�ItlI////�//l1 I eve a ,surf .esu r -r r wear eve . nen .. be, nbobe..er r suer, r+ee e. bee, ar S.My sue F r Bw2 Tree betail ' bee m a4 -r rq a surra ,�. a awr♦...��.��((��.. p..9.. r r .r a� fp �w eek e+.r,rr ..YM. aew'i ir? rn� ter. we w w w�rm rri .rr� ww.ee�rebw apr.l.p e a suer. w... r_wlr.le,ee. w,..w, f,ee. • w. e.e.q .fr wrrrrwresu. I ". 1Errwbrrw�p�+ver. WKtWDOd �SSKK1Zl$2fVKf5r Inc. I r.r...rrrlr.yruldw I r'� I �5 a I HepuEll 6z e.lffi rrr rarrNa r.w rod lr...b-r /HA -Greet. iYe Nes rwnr al CYr6 I599A, ADrAe w�N-rr�re ab pe,-,er-m Fen heRb M! Xie F 4.®eR - Ib, arm - {g 17• w.oG.: p2d$).315p Pec ylgl.em22 Abe, �2► 19906 Planting Notes car -t.. ,rmi prcwI. o e >aa. quo.o rd. m bl dont f I or m. scrubs Ee91nf m dale ar lbs L --1 piA,bNNN i o Aide -her . Are ce a! Ua Mltbl dnanq. Pepiacemnl pbnl mpt✓Ide Nal dee Row a e yeo quamtw camm�clnq upm dnlFy. Au dmte to be.- vo6e. umaewlo-wom Dasa/n naNr Spetlmn ,rade N., odben w, pal Ie sol IbnIIM ey, IN Idlo.Ay fln6wtle: All danle Ndl pa Fw rywn dbgn, peel,, founee, wan. to All plMil N., be Ire Fwn notkeCOle q p,. bd,4 IX 6eldmXlal MI p'MI, Ndo be !m A. ter. w decd bnNe. All plop Ndl 6M berry. hedthy bOMA9 And Ab r:anllrou, bore Ndl Ila, n n1 eblNe6 ,AN 4aer mea Note, to N. MA ofwlu Mn 5]. Plorb to mel Am. Stene b Nulwy 5t. (Amd, 69,1-IByO) ayYrnntc M she aye tee wecMRd. Nnp to be ..blee w pr NnNre .9 dntAq nwlku Uw mei v 12' bnl gntAq wl on Oen " 6• nae W, (eider ne beltrn of Me). l eAH M to be miNFq tap eel heel, to Me .1 rorty.. Iryr Mn nn FN, rA,G dmN, aye Na .. Contractor Nw eeff, IwyNne .,IN dl uUM.. Par to FNebtYn o1 plant. !I., al beep nCma: Iweallm. dome aM Nan R wt pMM ons or. Nn ". rnw1N-pants bee. - ,etas tee rq Nottrm. RrnM by M 1. Opow,erM �arof Ur.b n ON mOoraw. anon pts n petted Maybe we nd .p. Mona place o. nwmarY -ems Nndre rvnry, prnlb and to cnr.cl pee bmx NMp. Mnb Nal be F 11, Masted nm nlq m At. Frei nee-er t... 11 Te trnpre, AN, " MetumM peep to b weed u,o® Mabee rated: wo a E. rtnewd Y_Mewto qmn and N , papaw mem. AY pts are. NM p. reparpd Nm 4 of N"bee ra N.d TO mute sere Are nen 4A ANL 9cp. of ST n 9mlr M bee el L Por Few of repass ra6eoN pre ,nYA aM W Iw1 rand N b- . tr1 r.w, N arae M.Url ped. (NMP whW rw.) Nd Na» er1 Imbr, 1Nrk. e N wedged ped molts and VNeY-Vlw BIrL 9bTne (r qrW) poly Nei me .d*l dal be pace .IM .meets are. nd N Wept Y 5rn M. -t- o errOen baa um. Daps red W.eub M edge, A. pNbubi C nbaclrM con. fobsure -Me CT (141-A ocdrf AT 69.1252-IIN) 1a ,rvy bookewe el a uner"NA uUmUmm A lowtbr of past metra b subject to eld and ap rndlM. No lanUm, e6 W total. mnp'et. Athe Mn.®op nN AaIF9 wr.WrYn Me Nn fmbeMn age pore. reuwry -U,dr, of 0n1 netsm nil its Mast 'a Ner.dNWr o Yl,eNn p,bou- 4 wbbeeT.. 0'nr .t rod PoMM eatr N' Cnpoelr. Rood..91 to N ported rw. n YU I�ryeYn eY p. dep,/bu9. by e LorcaP.. . Cor... FfwmalM Nal .. of l re q,M,IFp can be .taFM hrn 6nr. Corfu. r. R 0'm�l m M ante �eMr led On'Never. W sea W.M..weer bJeRe RqN N d er,o o to party hrr MntF9 gratino ef No cat to e.r. Nem pet maga wb elution. NI be wwpted uMw. appaq Is r.wnlae o1 M. Lwe.awe A.NNwt by IM lmidww. Cntrwlr rlr to wpNaln o1 M. be nd/e, wrallw. Shrub Detail -11 mg Y !. 1:6 iae""'e..r pr..r'�rrti 0. ave wa.. No Plant List PreYk in Gmcpge / Ydw a AoFk E'n' 1.5• w CODE OTY. CMYCN/BOTANICAI NAVE Sim OVWSTMY in PaMae AN / frwnw peryboy boo 9a1mni 1S -1T ® Gen Ywn1aF 5uq Movie / Au Abb-'Ikml asuman' IS -15 W fVERf/wFIIw 61 Red Oo, / Qf...w IS -15- BB 4NM XnaNpwel / OIMXeb bNumNw q. Frmb' ,Ax e' I.S-15' 9B Redmond LF0.n / Tlk amrkena AMnotor lA•-].5' BB ® North. Red Mob. / AcrWuYIMMn rum d' IS -].5' 6B Bay (NA /Wrwe merwapd 1.5'-15. ep gMAACATAl N PreYk in Gmcpge / Ydw a AoFk E'n' 1.5• w $pw6 Am GNembf. / Ydw ,'$nFq Slloi CoIW ...- / Cela yue eruct -pats, 1.3' BB BB Jupnue Tree "*` / S", ntw.te '.S' .5' BB ® Autumn Milan.. SrAwfb y / A libbilr f , i6no '.Wtumn Brifianu 1.5'86 fVERf/wFIIw 61 &atl` XBN {run/Pkm douw ..to 9'-6' BB .WeYln pMe/4Fw nigra ' BB Cow. Gen SA vc/ Pian pungnr 6'-6' BB Scot. PFe / PMe eywlna Tour, ANpN1ae / m., -.1em alb 'Toburj 91RIIW 74 lent) Oaq.0a6 / Coni. Wobnllre 'lentr M' Tol Red 1N,AJ Doq.x6 Coma erkw p..y Y• Pot Nonprry Vturnum /ypumum Imago M. Pot Compaq Amrkn CrP-0rrAust YLunum / vitAr. Wopxn 'Compacta' 24' P.1 Il.r4 Bub Nn.pugw / pinta Inky. 24' Pot OM Weal Eunymu. / Eunaw. dew. 'CrnPaawi 24• of 24• Pat NOTES WANTTES M MAN SIIPityfq E UST WAVPTEs N ME EOENT OF A 91sQCPIIKY ,A,, STYB0.S NE d1Aw1 AT n: MATURTY 15'/X BUTTER REWNEIMT TEE WANTIM IRE MEIECM IN TE Rµ7 us• AN, ARE NOT SEPARATE WNITMS 19 Buffer Requirements peeium oen.Ity ndj f.rt to Road Buffs Yard Requhrn.t W (Lily Ordinance) 2.0 Canopy Traea pr 100' Lf of Buffr 4.0 Und.wry / 0mamertel Tree. pay IM' (F of Buffy 6.0 SArup. per 100' X of Buffs Tree. Required 707.31 lF / 100 6 - 7.07 7.07 N 2.0 = 14.14 O.eralay Trp, 7.07 i 4.0 s 28.26 Und"ory / Gnan.ud Lees 7.07 . 6.0 - 42.42 Sbrub. Tree. PrONde! 9 Owretory Tree. 5 8' Evergreen Tree. 17 Onam.tol Treem 11 6' Eusgre. Lee. 42 Shrub, No1Es: Jls Cf EVERGREENS M iAOCC M 7NIs IS' 6urYTA . 6' 1N 69F Ci MJRGR N MOY84D IN TIGS 15' BUFFER ARE 6' 7A11 W Buffer Requirements uedlum Density Adyace,t to Rase Bunn ram Rewbeln.l 'B' (City 0rdurbi 0.8 Conapy Trop per 109' S of Buns 1.6 Undsotery / pnamentd Tree. per 100' lF of Buffer 2.4 Sllrube ps 100' V of Buffs Trap R..ulHd 494.66 if / 199 LF - 4.95 4.95 . 18 - 196 CNr.tary neem 4.0.1.5- 7.92 Unds6tay / Orllanmld Treem 4.95 . 24 - 11.M 5brub6 Tree Provided 4 Opntory T,. 9 6' Ev,rpeen Trap 12 Undsetay Trop 9 6' Eyes. Tree 12 91rub. NOISY SOl a ETQ9TEW5 t wOLCd M MS ]C 9RiFA d e it E A 6 EWIQfFNS MIOVI= N THS w BUiyFR ME 6' TALL X 0' 100' 200' ]W' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-2 2002107ot-POICM 9.s 06/77/0.5 54wp 6 w 70 Liberty at Creek Side Landscape� SCANNED 0 2006 Weet.00d 1 -L 0 / MH -1 \Nil RE -884.7 E•867.5 i MH -2 BLUFF CREEK EDGE OF WATER (TYP)-- MH -19 MH -17 I �WE �N�e�•YI� �M lrA L•s:T_zHr--4M � .T.uuul. 1 -7 �T RE•a82.1 / l m7e MHT- \ I RE -882.7 T/ / ► I a .1 IE-870.1.Sim MiTLANO LNEI /y N) HIDATIGI 14 \\ IN\ Tl \ WETLAND BU SETBACK L04E CACALCULATEDROOOO D PLAT" LINE (TVP) 1 �� T— / I ' I � r A -12 -874. R-874..6 ► 2 aria 1w II••q�wr�.�T•5�• I YeAr Av 1•,Y� r Y I � • A11 � la�au Westwood Rdnia1Bl Services, hc. 7 .. l.._ TAeI N•W AN aw C!b Cl N!•!•II-YlelM Is pi-YHFR LY• 041" TIS N• N� N� •me, LD. f Call {B Hour bafar• digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T•dn City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Tali Free 1-800-252-1166 General Utility Notes • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EMSING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY GFFERENCES • THE COIIRACIOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NEGE 5MtY PERMITS FOR ALL 10131Il WTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY UNITS • SEE ARCH. PLAN FOR EXACT BUIXL LOCATION. SEE ATE RAN FOR LAYOUT MIINSONS. SERVICE ENTRY LOCATIONS RO BE WCRDINATED WITH THE ARCHITECT. • VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOC. • ELEV. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. • THE WATER SHALL BE INSTALLED MTM A MIN. OF 7.5 FT. OF COVER. THE CONTRACTOR SHAWL VERIFY THE CITY AS -BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHEM LOCATION AND MATERIAL TYPE. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT'GOPH10t STATE WE CALL' FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. • UNLESS OTHERMSE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIOUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 1999 ED. OF THE 'STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN.' AND TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION' MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REWIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS (XJTIINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. • ALL WAIERMAN PPE TO BE PVC C -90O • ALL SANITARY MANUNE AT 0.4K MINIMUM GRADE. Legend SANITARY SLIER a SANITARY SEWER —4— WATER — I — WATER —1— HYD. W/VALVE HYO. W/VALVE STORM SEWER — °O — STORM SEWER — N — NOT FOR CONSTRUCT Liberty at Creek Side C-1 ,�/ Np31Y0]Ill]PoIGIME LY! 06 [/�,�/Mr N.L V CFI 10 preamftu" UHH SC, rN'IED X 0' 100' 200' 300' C-1 ,�/ Np31Y0]Ill]PoIGIME LY! 06 [/�,�/Mr N.L V CFI 10 preamftu" UHH SC, rN'IED C2005 Westwood Professional SeMc<e, ore: Ae. SN Ima per WV4d1 AUftptans. ytt Np ma'Ae. epwn �`,l ]S.in b Mw wN A ) was SM x 0,ee M sessi s _ diesel ml� swe F.N201M1n YMf.na IPl we hbY MYa[f W. Tp2bYrlbNpby wrlME 2A T. r. ... i�...� e -m 2 WWO�eFEWY�OWwFWWBILT MYy 1n FENCE 2-W7 ` MW N41L R FeBRK 91311 E RACEp IMdew RLVt ro srro ,en Mw„rwx rxRaxw ROa(. A � V-- NOV.. 91 Nrrre M YIpOT gRMkvtlmw ww 240. w maTM YkN Nw, www a w, . t. e• .M A Iwt3W le lew TI...RA d(%ae) e - Tmss�-oov Mmau •N 'we pd i-Pwt(matlrYn wloe) RMIKiF lY RIERm w/.1FAJ SECTION AA crrr of- I FK= I I 88OF1ENROA) CB OENmi�i1all mTl eraREx -I rv�caw 2-07 5W 2-1A a 5]02 I TYPICAL LOCAL STREET SECTION (3Y BACK TO BACK) REFER TO PLAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS k EXACT SIDEWALK LOCATION CL �M ROW D0 ItOW 10• oh" �" ms I �0 I DRARNAOE Q UTILITY EASEMENT App 0 o p I/2' - MmMT 2150 LYAET50]OB NCM CCM = SPEC 2067 WNMINM TALI( COAT MMOT 2110 -Wm500p8 BASE COIINSE .ce S ANREGAIE B&2, lddds CROSNEp STOLE MDOT 3140.26 S OT GRNNAAR BORROR FACTEO SUBGRAOE 0 R YeIM" INr 4AM k UTILITY EASEMENT 0 0 0 t spE Lew 7z r i1 (FINN tlET sro LINING 1. sax sRrntt sxru E rrsE a Rana HAW soars I) 0125 1Ml!/BlAN2T5 alAHAW NN wE CONTACT I UY BI W,142 NaSLy ANo = al WPLRF EI STAPLE Ta YNFTAW OIECT CCNTACr NIIH 015fALLAll01 nc soL m IIm sINs:Tw Cdl 46 Howe before Bigg, GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Nn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 SII SI SI rml a• nw a NTI _ ___ --- p—ml r — 0.5' maw 6 w.aN dim BTREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE/STREET C D B SECTION (24' BACK TO BACIQ lzea� 12.01 . 1 "Cl a rod ua a aAa (m) � owls 1-1/Y MOOT 4fG 2J10 LYEAOXN EM NURSE YWT SPEC ]]32 EIIRWRAIS iIQ CWT Y MOOS SPEC 2]SO LMnIRO]® BAY 0.0.RE r door xc 2211 ays a loos aers+m slat Ame:W W aRE N MODE 940 ]14a'A SplC! aIAMAw1 OaY101 mW.1Cm N6NSE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION new 06/17/05 %awe 9 oR 10 Preliminary Grading Details Liberty at Westwvod Professional Ser ces, Inc. Y"�, w zww, M � _ ��A.�-�-� Err mad 6E NSA Arwwwn 4.M Ds%)0. W I f I �-- TN1 Creek Side Esss Pr.Me row,.: na.a2a+so rww. esv.F2>.w2 a0Y ra Ar — �^"�' I I M06S1 YE/� IYww IY osonA.wL Av,D,sodr. new 06/17/05 %awe 9 oR 10 Preliminary Grading Details 02005 W t - s v b Se cee. Inc. 2+00 PN STA - 32+00 PN STA - 5+90 PN ECFV - 89895 8+00 A.O. - -1.25 PN EL - 908.63 K - 40.16 IPM PN STA - 34+00 �'�I 50' IY r VCPVI ELEV - 888.% 5.4 NI X - K. 37.5 LP. ELEV - 862.16 LP. STA . 42+21.78 PN STA - 42+30 PN ETEV - 662.00 A.D. - 1.46 K - 61.54 w VC 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+DO 43+00 44+00 45+00 K+DO 47+00 48+00 49+00 STREET A 1+00 2+00 3+00 PN STA - 5+90 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 PN EL - 908.63 '9+' A.D. - -1.00 N K .90.33 1 0 11 I elY VC I r a d + N u o + 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 PRIVATE STREET C I wEll Ar.rwNa IN1;110 H.P. ETEV - 66&63 H.P. STA - 50+17.15 PN STA - 50+20 PN ELEV - 686.73 A.D. - -200 K - 20.00 I I Dld T R B ..00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 PRIVATE STREET D 11�J.q yY M. w'.r y � - V.1 I ZwY� q I �e mI I Pmpuad AA M1i 1.1�-ie-w- yrA m d•- flde lE e-�Id-IrrN-- OW 04,"Ol lL-�el� 40M DAIW 87th B 00 �IR 4fw6 860m DAnW STdf 960.00 PN STA - 11+91.67 PVI E 697.50 A.D. - -4.09 K - 30.00 12V VC I 6 R 4 $ L 6 R N e Cdl 48 Ham beton digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Ano 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll free 1-800-252-1166 PN STA - 22+66.24 PN EIEV - 891.68 A.D. - -2.01 K -19.91 PN STA - 23+26.24 PN El EV - 669.69 A.D. - 200 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 STREET B PN STA - 14+64.53 PN ELEV - 877.00 A.D. - 6.40 K - 37.50 - 240' VC - VC LP. ELEV - 87590 LP. STA - 19+95.75 PN STA- 18+17.86 PVI ElEV - 875.00 A.D. - 7A0 K - 38.18 290' VC 21. 60+00 61+DO 62+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 PRIVATE STREET E STREET F C-2 XDY1Ql1utt zm NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION De4e 06/17/05 .. 10 a m Liberty at TOWNS � HGVES Creek Side SCANNED Construction Flans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota *Dreocrec fon "10 W--\ & COUNTRY HOMES 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Praire, Minnesota 55344 Contact- Kevin Clark Phone: (952) 253-W2 Fax (952) 944-3437 Prepared by ". Westwood Professional Services, Inc 7 "An�ryam Orme Eden PnY$ MN 553`14 Project number: 20021071.00 Contact: Chris Moehrl, P.E. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 0 3 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Y1CI ll1 MAP .rmS NO. DATE REVL40N SHEM 1 02/03/08 Revisions Per City Comments ALL Construction Plans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chenheven, Minnewte Cletc 06/17/05 Sheet 1 of 111 ENDER SHM Na DBSC1Wn0N 1 COVER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 5 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 7 PRELIMINARY TREE INVENTORY PLAN 8 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 9 PRELIMINARY DETAILS 10 PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES Y1CI ll1 MAP .rmS NO. DATE REVL40N SHEM 1 02/03/08 Revisions Per City Comments ALL Construction Plans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chenheven, Minnewte Cletc 06/17/05 Sheet 1 of 111 Ctrood Profmimol I r J / �•� /i 40 x Legal Description IM xym•vearalr G a m. xafn.gf or es, L . Te. Fw 'M x 13 (Marv! ro nem a heat A). AIMR cmmmag N oro swmwef — o/ s Oon 11 rnwlYrb nor eeKa 2 V., vnry NaN m Socbs Ma x Mr: mexe F a ibd 1 . ra a pMr to mn 5um Y . IM a/ N! SC M /wr Ewf of o" soumvf — nT zM Ss1M: s ere RN .10 br m nitl SwmM corns, or ado !W. mO pace a bpinwa a•I9 a xrb-avey f o400 h S hwosf vner of ctl S lJm 1J. T afy 114 Napo TS wax 6aylnwy ns, w ban.et sena err a. xaa...f warm of m. xarm.a)e saes of sec(m 36, Tea'Ny Its Nam o/ Amyx n Mbrb mma. +ons dvq oo scars, -eves oan xn wap of eyo nae ro ca.nr reunfy Aava xa tow men .e.r Imp w nae rna r.a.V cess cane xme fa u o wW, or to ie o aeric. cwa arann.,wn.e weC 3m CTY /M ro . yaws, m m.f -19mn sae-.ef wain -ware ,� wa a. xaa...e aura w eu s.aw, ah a.p Mbf a wrap / n wr ro a. wafer -warn ears Ins a.p cam a wbp d x fes, ro yore w eaynby (es, ro to nem m nee a) EViPT. tlM par of hear A whbt Sm E®fatty a/ lwe 1 MUM Llor y LM 1. Lbm'nNp at rb nam wa'Ia mnr of qtl FeGbc X m.p tom .ef m Mnvm errTn ase. a mw.fe rJ alaxwM eery m. porn M es, m sawn a I6TA11 AW a (M pane o1 M IM) fo b Pweltl' IMn m m oNcua oI M Ja°er �� ,.i.,ra a .cga�0 .rc3n w.F, amar m m as nm a/ m aye. minre o]7 eea�b b- x161! heC ms,p m m atlarM of 115 baba le mMCIe l 10 aeaW b ml.n art m.p m m amen m 1m saw m mnm a I.mw a essay Tee re a I tome m ee ban sy err.dy xam.er seem a a. xaen.ef avec ea an s,mM w¢ / aM �I ear pit eI TiaY B mtn M MnaMMI aW SwmgMl N lTw 1 WavOtl alar fM 1: canms,My of IM /wwt of fmmewr/m of IM I aaaebf 000q Mao tom M m o = Ywm of yl 1J mwufe N acme lag fM awe AM of Ib Nora MT o/ ft NUaoof a tw o/ eN aMlm b 55613 Mf fe no pNt o/ LgiuMe a/ (bo 1 fo b MVEM 1Mo on m ml+wm o/ TIB aqr M mwufo Sy ettea h- Mfl1J IM: mmu IaMrm W 1W seem M' mto f el scads b JTiyl IM: fMco m m ooz o/ W syr W nJub JI ecma 3Y Jd o. MC fMo m m avrva of yy apev 25 mYvfo N wvM b SIAN /tor oW fMe tmKwfwq iap.fM- .M myrt eI azao MairM nae Oen LW Omnrof loo MOM ptoo— fo A® m;b.ny ylnnr be.r e-x-xaT. �\ ram sA. Abs Jam sae \` o' too' zoo• as c -i 2W31071EXP31 OW as, Liberty at 6/17/05 � 2 w 10 Creek Side Exwn concuflons/ Survey SCANNED cha.b 4 Mesh LEGEND WOOf�Pf0f2S5K1fIdI$ffVICfS, �flC, res+bbrr.v w°'*"�rwlirry.M�I.Mo�u Pupaed fa: =�- carEamrs Ix¢ (s..npaJ 0 6 � I Irb aNN M.lae M1 W O.nN �¢ xmuaas iAf£ ( nN ® ]591Mgen mMa ��i�( � OIwM ® f6n PaYY.Mel 83aa bMr f9i]]deM Is fII-O]3RT �N.,� �e I srm/tomo rose ® air Ms• Wie l tw. or a.. I/a of mn MY 1, 4 sMr-nrAmcymw a nAr® E1O s Mt m �' II'I: 31Pa 6alASEF ✓ I: I Y.YIRWNL MEI/. oa G1E YAttC I® G9E rveox O xroMwr IO. ' {y G31["Ipf OO MEIL e� 3 1 \ iF sliaE] ulE --.ate nerd fnvae,o �-' �� IIIIF YF \ w PoIfF /g£ �, \ p EIEL'6%' ear ° aerie sl w. yfa.mer \ \ MYo A.,aw Ewq Ip yranaw.r \ V \ �)�40 t neaee cal nm Ibn.ner \ e/ r fill ICIN l NIA \ Atlr TO S'.YE I ' M E; I. OYMM)// x Legal Description IM xym•vearalr G a m. xafn.gf or es, L . Te. Fw 'M x 13 (Marv! ro nem a heat A). AIMR cmmmag N oro swmwef — o/ s Oon 11 rnwlYrb nor eeKa 2 V., vnry NaN m Socbs Ma x Mr: mexe F a ibd 1 . ra a pMr to mn 5um Y . IM a/ N! SC M /wr Ewf of o" soumvf — nT zM Ss1M: s ere RN .10 br m nitl SwmM corns, or ado !W. mO pace a bpinwa a•I9 a xrb-avey f o400 h S hwosf vner of ctl S lJm 1J. T afy 114 Napo TS wax 6aylnwy ns, w ban.et sena err a. xaa...f warm of m. xarm.a)e saes of sec(m 36, Tea'Ny Its Nam o/ Amyx n Mbrb mma. +ons dvq oo scars, -eves oan xn wap of eyo nae ro ca.nr reunfy Aava xa tow men .e.r Imp w nae rna r.a.V cess cane xme fa u o wW, or to ie o aeric. cwa arann.,wn.e weC 3m CTY /M ro . yaws, m m.f -19mn sae-.ef wain -ware ,� wa a. xaa...e aura w eu s.aw, ah a.p Mbf a wrap / n wr ro a. wafer -warn ears Ins a.p cam a wbp d x fes, ro yore w eaynby (es, ro to nem m nee a) EViPT. tlM par of hear A whbt Sm E®fatty a/ lwe 1 MUM Llor y LM 1. Lbm'nNp at rb nam wa'Ia mnr of qtl FeGbc X m.p tom .ef m Mnvm errTn ase. a mw.fe rJ alaxwM eery m. porn M es, m sawn a I6TA11 AW a (M pane o1 M IM) fo b Pweltl' IMn m m oNcua oI M Ja°er �� ,.i.,ra a .cga�0 .rc3n w.F, amar m m as nm a/ m aye. minre o]7 eea�b b- x161! heC ms,p m m atlarM of 115 baba le mMCIe l 10 aeaW b ml.n art m.p m m amen m 1m saw m mnm a I.mw a essay Tee re a I tome m ee ban sy err.dy xam.er seem a a. xaen.ef avec ea an s,mM w¢ / aM �I ear pit eI TiaY B mtn M MnaMMI aW SwmgMl N lTw 1 WavOtl alar fM 1: canms,My of IM /wwt of fmmewr/m of IM I aaaebf 000q Mao tom M m o = Ywm of yl 1J mwufe N acme lag fM awe AM of Ib Nora MT o/ ft NUaoof a tw o/ eN aMlm b 55613 Mf fe no pNt o/ LgiuMe a/ (bo 1 fo b MVEM 1Mo on m ml+wm o/ TIB aqr M mwufo Sy ettea h- Mfl1J IM: mmu IaMrm W 1W seem M' mto f el scads b JTiyl IM: fMco m m ooz o/ W syr W nJub JI ecma 3Y Jd o. MC fMo m m avrva of yy apev 25 mYvfo N wvM b SIAN /tor oW fMe tmKwfwq iap.fM- .M myrt eI azao MairM nae Oen LW Omnrof loo MOM ptoo— fo A® m;b.ny ylnnr be.r e-x-xaT. �\ ram sA. Abs Jam sae \` o' too' zoo• as c -i 2W31071EXP31 OW as, Liberty at 6/17/05 � 2 w 10 Creek Side Exwn concuflons/ Survey SCANNED cha.b 4 Mesh LEGEND WOOf�Pf0f2S5K1fIdI$ffVICfS, �flC, res+bbrr.v w°'*"�rwlirry.M�I.Mo�u Pupaed fa: =�- carEamrs Ix¢ (s..npaJ 0 6 � I Irb aNN M.lae M1 W O.nN �¢ xmuaas iAf£ ( nN ® ]591Mgen mMa ��i�( � OIwM ® f6n PaYY.Mel 83aa bMr f9i]]deM Is fII-O]3RT �N.,� �e I srm/tomo rose ® air Ms• Wie x Legal Description IM xym•vearalr G a m. xafn.gf or es, L . Te. Fw 'M x 13 (Marv! ro nem a heat A). AIMR cmmmag N oro swmwef — o/ s Oon 11 rnwlYrb nor eeKa 2 V., vnry NaN m Socbs Ma x Mr: mexe F a ibd 1 . ra a pMr to mn 5um Y . IM a/ N! SC M /wr Ewf of o" soumvf — nT zM Ss1M: s ere RN .10 br m nitl SwmM corns, or ado !W. mO pace a bpinwa a•I9 a xrb-avey f o400 h S hwosf vner of ctl S lJm 1J. T afy 114 Napo TS wax 6aylnwy ns, w ban.et sena err a. xaa...f warm of m. xarm.a)e saes of sec(m 36, Tea'Ny Its Nam o/ Amyx n Mbrb mma. +ons dvq oo scars, -eves oan xn wap of eyo nae ro ca.nr reunfy Aava xa tow men .e.r Imp w nae rna r.a.V cess cane xme fa u o wW, or to ie o aeric. cwa arann.,wn.e weC 3m CTY /M ro . yaws, m m.f -19mn sae-.ef wain -ware ,� wa a. xaa...e aura w eu s.aw, ah a.p Mbf a wrap / n wr ro a. wafer -warn ears Ins a.p cam a wbp d x fes, ro yore w eaynby (es, ro to nem m nee a) EViPT. tlM par of hear A whbt Sm E®fatty a/ lwe 1 MUM Llor y LM 1. Lbm'nNp at rb nam wa'Ia mnr of qtl FeGbc X m.p tom .ef m Mnvm errTn ase. a mw.fe rJ alaxwM eery m. porn M es, m sawn a I6TA11 AW a (M pane o1 M IM) fo b Pweltl' IMn m m oNcua oI M Ja°er �� ,.i.,ra a .cga�0 .rc3n w.F, amar m m as nm a/ m aye. minre o]7 eea�b b- x161! heC ms,p m m atlarM of 115 baba le mMCIe l 10 aeaW b ml.n art m.p m m amen m 1m saw m mnm a I.mw a essay Tee re a I tome m ee ban sy err.dy xam.er seem a a. xaen.ef avec ea an s,mM w¢ / aM �I ear pit eI TiaY B mtn M MnaMMI aW SwmgMl N lTw 1 WavOtl alar fM 1: canms,My of IM /wwt of fmmewr/m of IM I aaaebf 000q Mao tom M m o = Ywm of yl 1J mwufe N acme lag fM awe AM of Ib Nora MT o/ ft NUaoof a tw o/ eN aMlm b 55613 Mf fe no pNt o/ LgiuMe a/ (bo 1 fo b MVEM 1Mo on m ml+wm o/ TIB aqr M mwufo Sy ettea h- Mfl1J IM: mmu IaMrm W 1W seem M' mto f el scads b JTiyl IM: fMco m m ooz o/ W syr W nJub JI ecma 3Y Jd o. MC fMo m m avrva of yy apev 25 mYvfo N wvM b SIAN /tor oW fMe tmKwfwq iap.fM- .M myrt eI azao MairM nae Oen LW Omnrof loo MOM ptoo— fo A® m;b.ny ylnnr be.r e-x-xaT. �\ ram sA. Abs Jam sae \` o' too' zoo• as c -i 2W31071EXP31 OW as, Liberty at 6/17/05 � 2 w 10 Creek Side Exwn concuflons/ Survey SCANNED cha.b 4 Mesh LEGEND I1k carEamrs Ix¢ (s..npaJ 0 ElEcmc lclm �¢ xmuaas iAf£ ( nN ® nEcmc uAxnt ® sAyrAAr larnaE Is srm/tomo rose ® Gmr saw l tw. or a.. I/a of mn MY 1, 4 sMr-nrAmcymw a nAr® E1O s Mt m ® YAl BJX ® 31Pa 6alASEF e Y.YIRWNL MEI/. oa G1E YAttC I® G9E rveox O xroMwr IO. ' {y G31["Ipf OO MEIL 1 \ iF sliaE] ulE --.ate nerd fnvae,o �-' �� IIIIF YF \ w PoIfF /g£ �, \ p EIEL'6%' ear ° aerie sl w. yfa.mer \ \ to A.,aw Ewq Ip yranaw.r \ V \ p neaee cal nm Ibn.ner \ e/ ICIN l NIA \ Atlr TO S'.YE x Legal Description IM xym•vearalr G a m. xafn.gf or es, L . Te. Fw 'M x 13 (Marv! ro nem a heat A). AIMR cmmmag N oro swmwef — o/ s Oon 11 rnwlYrb nor eeKa 2 V., vnry NaN m Socbs Ma x Mr: mexe F a ibd 1 . ra a pMr to mn 5um Y . IM a/ N! SC M /wr Ewf of o" soumvf — nT zM Ss1M: s ere RN .10 br m nitl SwmM corns, or ado !W. mO pace a bpinwa a•I9 a xrb-avey f o400 h S hwosf vner of ctl S lJm 1J. T afy 114 Napo TS wax 6aylnwy ns, w ban.et sena err a. xaa...f warm of m. xarm.a)e saes of sec(m 36, Tea'Ny Its Nam o/ Amyx n Mbrb mma. +ons dvq oo scars, -eves oan xn wap of eyo nae ro ca.nr reunfy Aava xa tow men .e.r Imp w nae rna r.a.V cess cane xme fa u o wW, or to ie o aeric. cwa arann.,wn.e weC 3m CTY /M ro . yaws, m m.f -19mn sae-.ef wain -ware ,� wa a. xaa...e aura w eu s.aw, ah a.p Mbf a wrap / n wr ro a. wafer -warn ears Ins a.p cam a wbp d x fes, ro yore w eaynby (es, ro to nem m nee a) EViPT. tlM par of hear A whbt Sm E®fatty a/ lwe 1 MUM Llor y LM 1. Lbm'nNp at rb nam wa'Ia mnr of qtl FeGbc X m.p tom .ef m Mnvm errTn ase. a mw.fe rJ alaxwM eery m. porn M es, m sawn a I6TA11 AW a (M pane o1 M IM) fo b Pweltl' IMn m m oNcua oI M Ja°er �� ,.i.,ra a .cga�0 .rc3n w.F, amar m m as nm a/ m aye. minre o]7 eea�b b- x161! heC ms,p m m atlarM of 115 baba le mMCIe l 10 aeaW b ml.n art m.p m m amen m 1m saw m mnm a I.mw a essay Tee re a I tome m ee ban sy err.dy xam.er seem a a. xaen.ef avec ea an s,mM w¢ / aM �I ear pit eI TiaY B mtn M MnaMMI aW SwmgMl N lTw 1 WavOtl alar fM 1: canms,My of IM /wwt of fmmewr/m of IM I aaaebf 000q Mao tom M m o = Ywm of yl 1J mwufe N acme lag fM awe AM of Ib Nora MT o/ ft NUaoof a tw o/ eN aMlm b 55613 Mf fe no pNt o/ LgiuMe a/ (bo 1 fo b MVEM 1Mo on m ml+wm o/ TIB aqr M mwufo Sy ettea h- Mfl1J IM: mmu IaMrm W 1W seem M' mto f el scads b JTiyl IM: fMco m m ooz o/ W syr W nJub JI ecma 3Y Jd o. MC fMo m m avrva of yy apev 25 mYvfo N wvM b SIAN /tor oW fMe tmKwfwq iap.fM- .M myrt eI azao MairM nae Oen LW Omnrof loo MOM ptoo— fo A® m;b.ny ylnnr be.r e-x-xaT. �\ ram sA. Abs Jam sae \` o' too' zoo• as c -i 2W31071EXP31 OW as, Liberty at 6/17/05 � 2 w 10 Creek Side Exwn concuflons/ Survey SCANNED cha.b 4 Mesh M l PC 742.33 I N0000839"W 704.89 -!( i (% oN 2R 1 \ / 1 1 \ 1 / 1 \ .im If \ 1 I i I / 1 I bOSyb� �� -eaawe.e rrooa non u.. (p+.l I I I I I I 1 \ Westwood Professional Sa vices, Inc. I w .a.... ..r, _ _ ... �� ••-r e+r�•e4er woeoamu y' Repnad � 2sse A'yno,we osA R'eMp A :sw rata N. lfm. ow IOWN 6t CDlJNCRY .nm.:svana+w eQm+l>.sm 0>7R1/06 riQl �-mac k•M"' �y?. IT•x. Development Data Totd Site Am 36.01t «. Edotbp Zmir9 A-2 AV(turd Presawtim E.WkV O pt on Retidmtiol Medwm Density (4-8 u/a) Prnpoaod Zardr9 Residentia' Medium Dmdty -PUO Told P/wrler Too J 96 colts Totd Cmcwd TaWAN 48 M. Ovral Density 4.0 un.Ix WfkIt A O.7- ayes Totd EArflq 101,&.0. 0.90 aan Tofd W.Uald MR Am 277. Told wx sf {. 1.47 acres Not DeeW*p Am -O.H ayes NO Dendfy 4.80 Tof tf kr4w os Am &97 ae (29I of Net) Sbwf, Raadea)e a ON Lord Publk Street ROW 2H ac Pudic Street - w ff. ROW JI ff. 8-8 Pdwte Stmt JI ff. B-H Prlwte ONrm 20 R B -B 9r6q saback, (M&* m ) Peak ROw 25 ff. 15 R -1—t dale Priwfe Stmf 25 R to book of curb M'wte W. M R. to bock o/ curb Abutfh9 Prcperty w ft WIHa Butler 70 a BuAdvey to Bu2dn9 20 R tPMlw.n Dd—Y LNWM premier M R. (to .6 w wdk) Majestic 10 R. (to orb m wad:) 1. lot dF and areae m 1. Mro,v xr tns P/af are approximota Rater to the d .f lot and wPP,rt data 1,r exact /ot dFnmalons and areax 2 All satbadcs m«cared exdudm9 stoops, patios. pmrhes a d«ks Ta gA d r Tom and Cam try Nares 1SI14 t Westwood Prole SerHces, Inc 7615 9netma Lore, Slits IM ,,ed 7599 Mkq Oriw Eden kIN 55tH Praha MN. SSJ41 - (95, 25J-0762 M. (952) 937-3150 M Fax: (952) 9H --4J7 F.. (() fax: (952) 9-7-5822 Cent«e: KIM tsark cent«b arts Moend Premier Lot ., m Typical Concord Lot a 0 0.0' Fro -o' 1 t j' t0.0' Legend Concrete Cart A Gutter Cma.te Sidewalk Liberty at Creek Side �� 0' 100' 200' M c-2 zoa2rmrrrrm.Owa D.ea 6!V/O6 ire 9 is 10 puftiminwy t SCANNED O2005 IFTteootl ProfeeolonW SenAoee, Inc _ - 1 e I Westwood ProfessiorlaI Services, Inc I ""r ;,•• • _. �, •� �'' I '""' I � I � tsar fir, on.. ora reen vnnls twt ssw L >rei ow wr.: eax.u�a�pa ra eazwpsaoa wo..r e.rr or TIMM w w 16464 Liberty at 1 �—_. U Creek Side mrYw.. p8emroti Call 48 hove Wa digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin My Mea 651-454-0002 W. Top Free 1-600-252-1166 X 0' 100 200' 30 P3 3W2101+SPGOtOxG o+e 6/17/05 w 4 a 10 Site SCANNED Plan 02005 R ° `WV 0 °CONNECT WM AND / }� SANTARY SEWER I lr BLLRF CREFR EDGE OF WATER (TVP)– MH -19 Mx -18 RE -917b RE -915.-1 MH -17 X`YGRAN 'n ��\oil HIM1111 Irmo i 1 �rrii !!=04 ilr DJii PatiniiF.7)II 11;J , iiPJ, TIL rim �L7ii ii�J11 U< ' I� ��- 1 �\ RE -8112.1 n��/7 N-EAs I \'�_�-f'" • I WETLAND UNE( WETLAN UNE (T WETLAAO BUFFER SETBACK UNE (TTP) CALCULATED FLO PAIN UNE (TYP) / w li•- • I \ I 1 I A H-12 E-874.2 p J I I lr•,•T �,W W.•r•P•.. pP•,M�. r•� WES'tWOOd PI'0�24101181 $BFVIlPS, IfiC. ". � '••ter r � i`r � • ��'L I ..W+n•.rr. r. w m..� 1593 w,ay.. on. ra., F�•.4, AW SDN CJdrM px!aAIM Wr+:>n.ssrsTe rc sa.mam P+ @/S/136 Ia_ w 40M RE -887.9 IE -874.6 0 Cal 48 Hour before dggh g: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWF CRY A,. 651-454-OD02 W. Ta `Fee 1-800-252-1166 General Utility Notes • THE CONTRACTOR SCULL vERFY ALL EASDNG CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY TIE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES • THE CONTRACTOR 6HALL RECEIVE 111E NE6SSAAY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK WTSIOE OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS • SEE ARCH. PLAN FOR EXACT BLDG. LOCATION. SEE STE PLAN FOR LAYOUT DWEN9ONS SERVICE ENTRY LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ARCNTECT. • VERIFY MISTING INVERT LOC. Q EIEV. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. • THE WATER SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MIN. OF 7.5 FT. OF COV THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TNI: CITY AS-BNLT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHEEK LOCATION AND MATERIAL TYPE • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UWTY INSTALLATION. • UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIWES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO ME 1999 ED. OF ME 'STANDARD UTILITIES 9PEOFlCATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY ME CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO ME STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION' MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 INCLUDING ME CURRENT ADDENDUM. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REWIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS WTUNED BY ME LOCAL AGENCY. • ALL WATERMAN PIPE TO BE PVC C-900. • ALL SANITARY MMUNE AT 0.45 MINIMUM GRADE. Legend cl/ EKSLtlG / SANITARY sE11ER — d — / WATER HYD. w/WALVE --�® STORM SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER —4— WATER —1— HYD. WIVALVE •* STORM SEWER —44- 100' N- NOT FOR CONBTRUCPioN Liberty at Creek Side I.- � \\\ mN \\\RE884215IS 300• 200• w li•- • I \ I 1 I A H-12 E-874.2 p J I I lr•,•T �,W W.•r•P•.. pP•,M�. r•� WES'tWOOd PI'0�24101181 $BFVIlPS, IfiC. ". � '••ter r � i`r � • ��'L I ..W+n•.rr. r. w m..� 1593 w,ay.. on. ra., F�•.4, AW SDN CJdrM px!aAIM Wr+:>n.ssrsTe rc sa.mam P+ @/S/136 Ia_ w 40M RE -887.9 IE -874.6 0 Cal 48 Hour before dggh g: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWF CRY A,. 651-454-OD02 W. Ta `Fee 1-800-252-1166 General Utility Notes • THE CONTRACTOR SCULL vERFY ALL EASDNG CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY TIE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES • THE CONTRACTOR 6HALL RECEIVE 111E NE6SSAAY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK WTSIOE OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS • SEE ARCH. PLAN FOR EXACT BLDG. LOCATION. SEE STE PLAN FOR LAYOUT DWEN9ONS SERVICE ENTRY LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ARCNTECT. • VERIFY MISTING INVERT LOC. Q EIEV. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. • THE WATER SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MIN. OF 7.5 FT. OF COV THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TNI: CITY AS-BNLT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHEEK LOCATION AND MATERIAL TYPE • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UWTY INSTALLATION. • UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIWES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO ME 1999 ED. OF ME 'STANDARD UTILITIES 9PEOFlCATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY ME CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO ME STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION' MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 INCLUDING ME CURRENT ADDENDUM. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REWIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS WTUNED BY ME LOCAL AGENCY. • ALL WATERMAN PIPE TO BE PVC C-900. • ALL SANITARY MMUNE AT 0.45 MINIMUM GRADE. Legend cl/ EKSLtlG / SANITARY sE11ER — d — / WATER HYD. w/WALVE --�® STORM SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER —4— WATER —1— HYD. WIVALVE •* STORM SEWER —44- 100' N- NOT FOR CONBTRUCPioN Liberty at Creek Side I.- � C-2 moa071U m01 OW DYe 06/17/0.5 s.e 8 GP 10 300• 200• 100' C-2 moa071U m01 OW DYe 06/17/0.5 s.e 8 GP 10 c rstro Profa d SeM . 1 FMe TPSf YwYMvn. MIMI L%Mb1YlsPrl 1PZbYwybpq[{la�y. CXTY C)F SLT Qu� F810E 5600 o TYPICAL LOCAL STREET SECTION 44�(31! BACK TO BACK) REFER TO PLAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS & EXACT SIDEWALK LOCATION A o, OL 0 0 0 1-1/2• - Mn00T 2350 LVNEJN.me M C016tS a T s C. 2357 611U M TACK COAT Y - Wi00T 0350 LVAe0N3C6 6,15( WWSE tY - MASS 5 AG GATE BASE, 1006 QR9E➢ SttriE N• 1sio0T 3140.20 sf)ECT Ub3Hi1LAR BC6R0! CQPALRD 519CRAOE WB�YYOOfI P17�90f�A•e4 tIL �rrr3� iy�r lesiva rrrwrrrrb w.srr..ma..s 35A A�0 pte Film Rorie 1.N 43m !8 wvw-. 951 f1]-5]30 f, e'. 95391 ]»e]] eer tr r 4� �= adP16 uArz/sllHi9 SXmAD BE ei5TA1lfo ` TTCMLT OOYRIIlIF£ . O 6'-3A32 CCNCREIE p ASS 5 v GGHPACTED SUBGRAGE CONCRETE WALKWAY 9.,SW MI, pr IYK )d i m i.o Fv uoor s� sa 1a4 iwelsiwt >oW exe�i b hko u tae wn Y�1 e.e, SM1.Ib rLLyyN Finau (YWnYr Yew. FMe TPSf YwYMvn. MIMI L%Mb1YlsPrl 1PZbYwybpq[{la�y. CXTY C)F SLT Qu� F810E 5600 o TYPICAL LOCAL STREET SECTION 44�(31! BACK TO BACK) REFER TO PLAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS & EXACT SIDEWALK LOCATION A o, OL 0 0 0 1-1/2• - Mn00T 2350 LVNEJN.me M C016tS a T s C. 2357 611U M TACK COAT Y - Wi00T 0350 LVAe0N3C6 6,15( WWSE tY - MASS 5 AG GATE BASE, 1006 QR9E➢ SttriE N• 1sio0T 3140.20 sf)ECT Ub3Hi1LAR BC6R0! CQPALRD 519CRAOE WB�YYOOfI P17�90f�A•e4 tIL �rrr3� iy�r lesiva rrrwrrrrb w.srr..ma..s 35A A�0 pte Film Rorie 1.N 43m !8 wvw-. 951 f1]-5]30 f, e'. 95391 ]»e]] eer tr r 4� �= adP16 uArz/sllHi9 SXmAD BE ei5TA1lfo ` TTCMLT OOYRIIlIF£ . O 6'-3A32 CCNCREIE p ASS 5 v GGHPACTED SUBGRAGE CONCRETE WALKWAY WA nF•T snvrrUNNG s>ff sMEAa sHAu a FirtE aF 1mC15, moos. AW Auo c6Ass uA15/1)VWI(Cts 6l/J4al$ 9YALL xAYE NOD 50l WXTACf ur awxrrs LOOmlr Alel STAT¢ OR MATE 10PE EI WT m WlRA41 OeEtit CWTACT 10tH NSTAILATI011 W5 w1107 510EiCN 7LA Cdl � Hours befne dgging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T.h My Am 651-454-0002 Mn. TM Free 1-600-252-1166 !YJ 31 91 91 91 I I I I brUR a i1D! a toil ---- as - o.s• SeEpnox a F1DN d snECT TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION (24' BACK TO BACK) 1sAu a m eAa aF aee (m) anr2 vias _ 1-,/Y IMOI 9SC 2YA LYILYaT® eFM CPR4 YiWt 9RC 2� BSOAM:YS TA CWT Y WppT 9!Ea 2Y0 LYMaCOA MY CPMY r a+»r sr[a m, aAm a ,aw rnwm sTata AooEc4Te ..s M• rmr sEc 3140.'A sL[cr awuAn Bomw CalAC® 9aA0E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side L owe 06/17/05 9 of 10 Preliminary Grading Details hko WA nF•T snvrrUNNG s>ff sMEAa sHAu a FirtE aF 1mC15, moos. AW Auo c6Ass uA15/1)VWI(Cts 6l/J4al$ 9YALL xAYE NOD 50l WXTACf ur awxrrs LOOmlr Alel STAT¢ OR MATE 10PE EI WT m WlRA41 OeEtit CWTACT 10tH NSTAILATI011 W5 w1107 510EiCN 7LA Cdl � Hours befne dgging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T.h My Am 651-454-0002 Mn. TM Free 1-600-252-1166 !YJ 31 91 91 91 I I I I brUR a i1D! a toil ---- as - o.s• SeEpnox a F1DN d snECT TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION (24' BACK TO BACK) 1sAu a m eAa aF aee (m) anr2 vias _ 1-,/Y IMOI 9SC 2YA LYILYaT® eFM CPR4 YiWt 9RC 2� BSOAM:YS TA CWT Y WppT 9!Ea 2Y0 LYMaCOA MY CPMY r a+»r sr[a m, aAm a ,aw rnwm sTata AooEc4Te ..s M• rmr sEc 3140.'A sL[cr awuAn Bomw CalAC® 9aA0E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side L owe 06/17/05 9 of 10 Preliminary Grading Details SerMces, LP. El = 662.16 LP. STA - 42+21.78 PN STA = 42+30 PN ELEV = 662.00 A.D. = 1.46 K - 61.54 90 VC '-- - -- -•••�� +�rw +,xw 41+w 41+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 STREET A PROPOSED C£NTMUNE GRADE (TW.) PN STA - 6+90 EMS11NC CEHTERl1NE GRADE PN EIEV - 909.53 v� A.D. - -1.00 + r6 K 90.33 1 90 v I 6 N $ R 5 s a N d n a �$ DA-=00 " 885. I 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 STREET C I ". �wPa4b-IYMa Fc 11�I-tel e•b.Yw RY'I �u I YrY� Mn MYMgrr NaS .Y •4YIa�� OtNN w -an n. pv rm•nnY mum Ia+en+,m Gem. eEe.`m, Pa YYestvoo d ^m'°°°e'm°` d, 02/03186 �w 408,363 N.P. El -Ey - 902.67 X.P. STA = 20440.25 PN STA = 20+40 PN EL - 903.80 A0. _ -6.02 K = 24.91 1w VC ro n a 'Yii a m + g N PN STA - 24+43.50 PN MEV - 891.69 A.D. - -2.00 K 20.01 PN ETA - 24+83.50 PN EIEV -889.69 A.D. = 2.00 K i 20.00 40 I --T 1— 47 VC 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 STREET B H.P. El EV - 888.63 HR. ETA - 50+17.15 PN STA - 50+20 PN ElEV - 68&;3 A.D. K DATE 6 895.00 D 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 STREET D NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION urs d I enpn for TOWN & -`7 � tae e+/ Saw DA7T7A/ Abe 89500 STREET E n d, 0 60+00 61+00 62+00 Liberty at Creek Side C&I 46 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Trin Cit, Area 651-454-0002 N, Tod Er. 1-800-252-1166 -2 7 21070, 020 0xc 06/17/05 mac 10 De 10 13i•ihminuy Street Frofiles VIC!NM MAP Construct ion Plans L YNAN BLVD for Preliminary Plat Submittal f U r CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED Liberty at Creek Side JUN 17 2005 Chanhassen, Minnesota CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Prepared lar: 10"\ ,riOtP.IHYlk`11L' 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Praire, Minnesota 55344 Contact Kevin Clark Phone: (952) 253-0462 Fax (952) 9443437 Prepared by. ". ~wocd Protess"I Sewei,IIIc. �wr,..n.miw�xw w.oae.uraw w:nnt.wt Project number: 20021071.00 caroma". uom,,. Pr OmO Construction Plans Preliminary Plat Submittal Liberty at Creek Side SCANNED / 19 C:3 I� / , Je ell IA Ica >o . ? e= keF Sai F S •!rt f=k = ? � i � tii jja �kgSt .lap e i =neem . 1 . I * • ?�] ii , f lrS�t �! t X •"+ Iii %3 tsli�ee i F,i iv �S7°i k ail E�a3` fi;eS j It 3qi� i j`Shill}i R e �i ! � a '�t jt:a`: i r e' ea los• ease z `— x l �:1'k; ! ;�++_€ it a :•t';It !{i�. 1 c � � ai 3� c � B i i� f pf,,{{kki �!3Atli IF. E l • S F R[[ t a l l y ��• ii ! tlilti5 l xa�tik• l� t ! � S � � ` l d t t � t 1 8 �l(F a k$l7ii iIF? I-lliti- tFS tree!; ;�! •as ;at� I \� Im $K EI Ott �` i i R a C '.o 0 4 T rD n 2 T' �'• 4 3! E:�F Fg:€S�F �;F�IEpp�:�iFa$� I� � F�${�+!!� eppi,[1 ia11, 1 9 i a : !'a7 !! Fa E !� i.. F e a A !A6 m K 8s $$$g$e ?o°oaa !$I .Algae?€ � i �i E5 1. g'-�[9!!F-g@�F as°Oaa zdd dd ddddd Av d P 9a !d! Fa a !• !4 g! B?!@Fsg 3. ° 3a fall 6FIfetaxe p of � & ®k 9� � � � • a !g !F ;?a � ; � � ' ids "slj;b; $p � g � s i^ �� AgA A � aifi �l�A!•� 5 P @ $ 8 gi a P � i F s€� i ' I ; f �6 RR 1 41j my dd 3"- r pF -ns i 5 i i R a C '.o 0 4 T rD n 2 T' �'• 4 3! E:�F Fg:€S�F �;F�IEpp�:�iFa$� I� � F�${�+!!� eppi,[1 ia11, 1 9 i a : !'a7 !! Fa E !� i.. F e a A !A6 m K 8s $$$g$e ?o°oaa !$I .Algae?€ � i �i E5 1. g'-�[9!!F-g@�F as°Oaa zdd dd ddddd Av d P 9a !d! Fa a !• !4 g! B?!@Fsg 3. ° 3a fall 6FIfetaxe p of � & ®k 9� � � � • a !g !F ;?a � ; � � ' ids "slj;b; $p � g � s i^ �� AgA A � aifi �l�A!•� 5 P @ $ 8 gi a P t 4 Qe. Ei};PlliFtis[q,?'q if S [ 'z i[3? is ti +S [ e ! FSS tli-if r '; � i! }�' it S: ! 1. :°i' [ [j[ i[ 7 i a r :: i - }. }ff• at-? ifHis aF 7 Fs ii [ [2 j. [. S t q . q S t `S pp// y_ iT lit [ � ( 4:L S. , i � } } � ;�F[ i [ ` S }' ; • i 6 F ° r t[i 991 ®v6 & T....:{ ''�s� 8a = e; $aaf3 P; 8eiaf! h7 i [F }• Si - eD - 111F111 i a? g — e ? a? s �ilit �} r 4 Qe. Ei};PlliFtis[q,?'q if S [ 'z i[3? is ti +S [ e ! FSS tli-if r '; � i! }�' it S: ! 1. :°i' [ [j[ i[ 7 i a r :: i - }. }ff• at-? ifHis aF 7 Fs ii [ [2 j. [. S t q . q S t `S pp// y_ iT lit [ � ( 4:L S. , i � } } � ;�F[ i [ ` S }' ; • i 6 F ° r t[i 991 ®v6 & T....:{ ''�s� 8a = e; $aaf3 P; 8eiaf! h7 i [F }• Si - eD " O i a? g — e ? a? s �ilit di PRit - iF ga 7}x'i3 p o .. t ; [ saaw a:aa an... gg Z I4 a 4411 4 rM Ie -•9 f$is»$aa_aax$$?$$$$$?$a$_sF?i$$$4$i a%%$�$a.". aaa •'-] ra,:: „8 B .F-r.;[as ?•im [[rg[r EFIF [:[F r1a.Errrrr[e$FFF HFEE.?[jFu �•miF r3 •:; _i.-;,[ �=ms1#1-[#[:ajfi[[i[i[aai1S„#@@@€@##?i:i?4f$15 ¢¢¢ 49[9av33A €i mu .. ..... [[ [ wise#iia.€[s7[[eaaalaaala3#s#i'saeiee[e[aaeaaaaadlt7[[6a3's's[ie[if,[i[i[[[[[31 it cw:<a_2:..:...tl.::..._ =a_ .. '-: `e5 iiii s�% essccc'ai F>eiiei nis-i'gc iy3e etc— r=ssv- • FS#0##dF+[[F#'SFE#3FFFFFFFF FFF FFFEF 6FFi ....... it F F FFFEI,FEEEE#".[.ae 11 a#,',�3eif vii i###i4!@@@f3ae#{€##31;#i€ r rye i P aaE.�:.==ba:ai---i�.::::._�iii.a-.--:.._aa=::a,.a== -• 2=•i----iaa,:�.: P p i � `1 `.'fi ue#eiiii3c3 �aiieiiene=e= ;# CP a¢ a �” I�J a' [� FFFFtrF}i� a(rr��rFEFrr; CY i � A e < G „4 fl 4 6 $ 6 K",� 0101-.2"i ` / R )q# ` ~ }2� \ §) \} \ \\ Ari (■ b/ § \ 0101-.2"i / R )q# ` ~ � § r,.. Iy g9_ Y 3 B� 47 - s caZEa s eov06a a 4�1 k... SS e a o^FSE z=e's s Fs�G a ai sats axy"s a T�Ea B�.ET 47 - s caZEa s eov06a 4�1 o^FSE Construction Plans Preliminary Plat Submittal o r Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota Preporea tor: TOWN & COWM HOMES 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Praire, Minnesota 55344 Contact: Kevin Clark Phone: (952) 253-0462 Fax (952) 9443437 Prepered by: ". Westwood Professional. Services, Inc. rsmar.>M on.. r. aua mss�w Project number: 20021071.00 C tact: LMe Mminl. 11 VICN r MAP X �m00 ovv�m©_ Construction Plans S Preliminary Plat Submittal Liberty at Creek Side M P€ g ?� X 0 cn .4 Hill Rp CL wC Al AE J. Z Nz�= ep'p �;BQ dYc R 'a f A 41 a $ s 1 'Yw �eY e i tib ¢ P€ g ?� X 0 cn .4 Hill Rp CL wC Al AE J. Z Nz�= ep'p �;BQ dYc R 'a f A 41 a $ s 1 'Yw �eY e i tib � p |� � � T 7 ƒ |§ �� , ! ; . » pill; � 14 . U -M`\` � 2 � p |� � � 8MA ry m -.we Y / rv�v-nsw s I uvea-wo.a II a_g, Ha " Ee�E 81 8—sir-1 ry m . —,,- U ry oay. wra w.a ° Y=PLeF an.wv BCy: n t 6.•. Y � oar-�vo ey 8 �p I cae- eaw I E -n rw n.un m 8 _ i �v. usa a o;L = Y„•°Y:: 6 =i sg U ry oay. wra w.a ° Y=PLeF an.wv BCy: n os -dq 7. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be complete within one year of the authorized fill on Liberty on Bluff Creek. SCANNED The City o1 Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails. and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. May 24, 2006 Mr. Shawn Siders CITY OF Town & Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 CHA NSEN Eden Prairie, MN 55344 7700 Market Boulevard Re: Liberty at Creekside PBox 141 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Planning Case 05-24 g Administration Dear Mr. Siders: Phone: 952227.1100 Fax: 952227.1110 This letter is to confirm that on May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council Building Inspections approved the following: Phone: 952227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development Engineering with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Phone: 952.227.1160 Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Fax: 952.227,1170 Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design Finance standards contained within this staff report. Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Park & Recreation Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, Phone: 952227.1120 revised Apri16, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around Fax 952.227.1110 each dwelling unit, subject to the following conditions: Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 1. The applicant shall prepare a noise analysis for noise that will be Fax 952227.1404 generated by traffic on Highway 312. The analysis shall identify Planning a appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for Natural Resourcesresidential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Y, Phone: 952.227.1130 which shall be implemented by the developer. - Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Warks 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and 1591 Park Road architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 3. The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as their portion of the 2005 AUAR. Senior Center Phone: 952.2271125 - 4.- The developer shall revise the plat to incorporate the twin home units as Fax: 952.227.1110 -shown onthe plan dated May 8, 2006. Web Site www.d.chanhasnn.mn.us 5. The developer shall establish a separate outlot(s) for the land within the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone. 6. Dedication of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone shall be made to the city or a conservation easement shall be established over said outlot(s). 7. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be complete within one year of the authorized fill on Liberty on Bluff Creek. SCANNED The City o1 Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails. and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 2 of 7 8. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. 9. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. Due to a secondary access through the MnDOT right-of-way (ROW) to the north in the northeast portion of the property, the applicant will be responsible for creating or securing sufficient wetland mitigation for MnDOT that will meet all conditions imposed on MnDOT and will be responsible for any and all fees associated with the redesign of the wetland mitigation areas in MnDOT ROW. Final plat approval shall not be granted until the wetland mitigation plan has been received and approved by the City and MnDOT. 11. The plans shall be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas shall be preserved. In addition, all structures shall maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading shall occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 12. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations shall occur within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. 13. The applicant shall submit a plan for the revegetation of the farmed area south of Bluff Creek that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Special attention shall be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). 14. Alterations appear to be proposed within a mapped FEMA unnumbered A Zone (100 - year floodplain). In lieu of a LOMA, .the applicant shall obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain. 15. A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) shall be developed for the development and shall be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. 16. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the proposed pond. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail shall be included the plan. 17. The plans shall show paths of access to both wedand mitigation areas as well as all ="' wlz erosion controls and restoration practices. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 3 of 7 18. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slone Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 19. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 20. The applicant shall provide details for curbside inlet control_ Wimco-type inlet controls shall be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. 21. Typical building lot controls shall be shown on the plan. These controls may include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. 22. The proposed storm water pond shall be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond shall be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail for the temporary pond outlet shall be included in the plans. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. 23. The ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek shall be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. 24. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. 25. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $266,850. 26. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 4 of 7 27. Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to construction around all areas designated for preservation and/or at the edge of proposed grading limits. 28. Silt fence or tree protection fencing shall be installed at the edge of grading around both wetland mitigation areas. 29. A fenced access road will lead from the east mitigation area to the west mitigation area. This will be the only access allowed to the western site. Fencing shall be placed on either side of the access lane. After construction, the access lane shall be restored according to the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan'. 30. A walk-through inspection of the silt/tree preservation fence shall be required prior to construction. 31. No burning permits shall be issued for tree removal. All trees removed on site shall be chipped and used on site or hauled off. 32. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 33. The applicant shall submit a full sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 34. A turf plan shall be submitted to the city indicating the location of sod and seeding areas. 35. The developer shall pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final plat approval in lieu of parkland dedication. 36. The applicant shall provide all design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the `Bluff Creek Trail." All construction documents shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be ten feet in width, surfaced with bituminous material and constructed to meet all City specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed for the actual cost of construction materials for the Bluff Creek Trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials utilized in its construction. 37. The developer shall provide a sidewalk connection to the Bluff Creek trail through private street B. 38. The developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Pioneer Pass (Peterson Property) and Degler property developments to the west and northwest. 39. The height and length of retaining walls must be reduced to the maximum extent possible. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 5 of 7 40. The top and bottom of wall elevations must be shown on the final grading plan. 41. A building permit is required for any retaining walls four feet high or taller. These walls must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 42. The style of home and lowest floor elevation must be noted on the grading plan. 43. Typical sections for each housing style must be shown on the final grading plan. 44. The final grading plan must be 50 scale so that staff can complete a full review of the proposed grading. 45. The developer must verify the invert elevation of the sanitary sewer connection that will be constructed with the 2005 MUSA Improvement Project. 46. The development may not proceed until the Phase H 2005 MUSA utility extension project has been awarded. 47. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges and the SAC charge at the time of building permit. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00/unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00/unit for watermain. The SAC charge is $1,625.00/unit. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 48. The northern access (currently shown to the Fox property) must be shifted to the east to the MNDOT right-of-way parcel. Prior to final plat approval, the developer must contact the Fox family to coordinate the elevation of the northern street connection at their property line. 49. The Arterial Collector Fee shall be paid with the final plat. The 2006 fee is $2,400/developable acre. 50. The final plans must show the new orientation for Lots 13 and 14, Block 2. 51. The site plan and final grading plan must identify the proposed 10 -foot wide bituminous trail. C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, subject to the following conditions: The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 6 of 7 3. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire - resistive construction. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. 7. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 8. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 9. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 10. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 11. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required on the private streets. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of sign. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991. 12. Staff will work with the developer on materials, colors and diversity. 13. The developer shall incorporate the twin home units as proposed in the sketch plan dated May 8, 2006. D. Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff reek Overlay District subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 2. The applicant shall submit a full-sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 7 of 7 3. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. 4. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. Enclosed is a site plan agreement that must be executed by Town & Country Homes. If there is a separate property owner, they will need to sign the consent page at the end of the agreement. If there is a separate mortgage holder, they will need to sign the mortgage holder consent page. Return the agreement to me for city execution and recording at Carver County within 120 days of the final plat approval. The executed site plan agreement and required security specified in the site plan agreement shall be submitted prior to the City issuing a building permit. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City three weeks prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bizenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Si" Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosures ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official gNplan'2005 rrL ° gcasesW5-24h'6erty uac"de\appmval letter preliminary.doc Engineering MEMORANDUM Phone: 952.227.1160 TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Cl �rl l�p Ofp FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner CIIHLIIIHJSEN City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. Finance DATE: May 22, 2006 7700 Market Boulevard DISCUSSION Box 147 Chan asssen, MN 55317 SUBJ: Liberty at Creekside 0� Senior Center Planning Case #05-24 IMministratien Phone: 952,227 1100 The developer is proposing splitting the off-street parking areas on private street C. Fax: 952.227.1110 This change will be more convenient for the future residents of the neighborhood. waw.ci.chanhassen.mn.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Building Inspections RECOMMENDATION PFax:955227.11900 Fax: 952227.1190 This item was tabled at the April 24, 2006 CII Council meeting. � Y g' Engineering ACTION REQUIRED Phone: 952.227.1160 Premier product line and replaced them with the twin home Premier product line. Fax: 952.227.1170 These emits will be interspersed around the project, primarily at the edges. Recreation Center 2318 Courter Boulevard City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. Finance by creating additional breaks in the new home sites. The overall number of units Phone. 952 227,1140 DISCUSSION Fax 952.227.1110 from the 212 corridor from the closest perspective. The distance between the rear Park s Recreation The developer has revised the development plans and eliminated the six -unit Phone: 952227.1120 Premier product line and replaced them with the twin home Premier product line. Fax: 952.221.1110 These emits will be interspersed around the project, primarily at the edges. Recreation Center 2318 Courter Boulevard Eliminatingthe six -unit Premier homes provides views through the neighborhood p g � Phone: 952.227.1400 by creating additional breaks in the new home sites. The overall number of units Fax: 952.227.1404 would remain 146 units in 37 buildings. Planning & Natural Resources Attached is a narrative from Shawn Siders to Mayor and City Council addressing the Phone: 952.227.1130 changes to the plan. The developer has revised the use of color on the rear of the Fax: 952.227.1110 four -unit Premier buildings to further delineate each unit. The development will Public works use all six color schemes on the Premier units. Because of the limited number of 1591 Park Road Concord homes on the site, the developer will use three color schemes for these Phone: 952.227.1300 homes. The developer has provided a perspective of the Liberty at Creekside Fax 952.227.1310 from the 212 corridor from the closest perspective. The distance between the rear Senior Center of these homes and the proposed 212 corridor is approximately 250 feet. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 The developer is proposing splitting the off-street parking areas on private street C. Web She This change will be more convenient for the future residents of the neighborhood. waw.ci.chanhassen.mn.us RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the four motions approving the project as specified on pages 17 - 23 in the revised staff report dated March 21, 2006. l0 {CANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Todd Gerhardt Liberty at Creekside May 22, 2006 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter from Shawn Siders to Mayor and City Council dated May 16, 2006. 2. Liberty at Creekside Preliminary Sketch Plan dated May 8, 2006. 3. Images from Proposed 212. 4. Front Elevation Mission Twin. 5. Rear Elevation Mission Twin. 6. Front Elevation Victorian Twin. 7. Rear Elevation Victorian Twin. 8. Front Elevation Farmhouse Twin. 9. Rear Elevation Farmhouse Twin. 10. Front Elevation Mission Four. 11. Rear Elevation Mission Four. 12. Front Elevation Victorian Four. 13. Rear Elevation Victorian Four. 14. Front Elevation Farmhouse Four. 15. Rear Elevation Farmhouse Four. 16. Concord Front Elevation. 17. Revised Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 21, 2006. 18. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 19. Letter from Shawn Siders to Bob Generous dated May 1, 2006. 20. 2005 Open Space, Trail and Development Areas. g.Nplan\2005 planning ea \05-24 liberty at creeksidetexecutive summaryldm TOWN & May 16, 2006 Mayor and City Council City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Dear Mayor and City Council: _nx COUNTRY HOMES a K Hmnanian' Company Thank you for the opportunity to refine our development plans for the Liberty at Creek Side community. Since our meeting on April 24, 2006, we have challenged ourselves to further distinguish the Liberty at Creek Side neighborhood. Since our discussion, we have revised our development plans and have eliminated the six unit Premier product line and have replaced them with our twin home Premier product line. This significant modification to the development plans will offer enhanced views of the community as you travel through the development or past the development on the new 212 corridor. By eliminating the six unit Premier homes, we have been able to "open up" the views through the neighborhood by creating additional breaks in the new home sites. In addition to the revised development plans, I am also enclosing the front and rear elevations of the two and four unit Victorian, Mission and Farmhouse Premier homes that will be dispersed throughout the community. These three distinct housing styles have enhanced architecture that ensures the appearance of the front and rears of these homes are distinguishable. Since our discussion on April 24th, we have also revised the use of color on the rears of the four unit Premier buildings to further delineate each unit With respect to the color schemes to be used throughout the community, we are also prepared to use all six color schemes on the Premier units. Because of the limited number of Concord homes on the site, we would suggest using three color schemes for these homes. During our previous discussions, there have been many inquiries as to how this community will be "viewed" from the new 212 corridor. We have taken this opportunity to provide a perspective of this community from the 212 corridor. The attached perspective provides a view of the Liberty at Creek Side neighborhood from the closest perspective. The distance between the rears of these homes and the proposed 212 corridor is approximately 250 feet. This perspective highlights the varied architecture that will be used throughout the development as well as the extensive landscaping that will provide an appropriate buffer to these future residents. 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 • Eden Prairie. Minnesota 55344 • Phone 952-944-3455 • Fax 952-944-3437 • ~a townandcomtryhomesmn com Minnesota Builder #20539403 6 #20543466 City of Chanhassen Liberty at Creek Side May 16, 2006 Page 2 Through the site design that preserves and creates natural features, offers home sites with enhanced views of the natural areas, the introduction of the twin home product line, the distinct architecture and use of color throughout this community, we feel that we have created a unique community that will offer additional life cycle housing opportunities to the current and future residents of Chanhassen. I would like to thank the City Council and staff for their collaborative partnership which has challenged Town & Country Homes to create a distinct neighborhood which will be a proud addition to the city of Chanhassen. Thank you for your continued support of the Liberty at Creek Side community and we look forward to your approval on May 22, 2006. We will be prepared to discussing these modifications with you in greater detail at our meeting. Very truly yours, ✓/c hawn Siders Community Planning Manager Enclosure(s) cc: Kevin Clark, Vice President of Land Development Rick Janssen, Vice President of Land Acquisition Mi M: tj 9 Liberty at CreekSide bd, kv."�'�� k yy� aw w MOUNT Li6erty at CreekSide Wit. .• ...� aai Li6erty at CreekSide LI*6erty at CreekSide LM LI*6erty at CreekSide o� D RSI Liberty at CreekSide IL D RSI Liberty at CreekSide F u JELL I U ALLM LJ a��R nfi"� �1 .w,lAr •.��. JAI' Liberty at Creeksidfe ;a y ail ifE;t . i 4 t 4'I . t il..I LU VT. LA r 7 Liberty at CreekSide i R 9 ' , "�. r � s ra wunhtlfkkl�n'k L16erty at CreekSide V m X Wom X n �_—�\•..�'I . .r c .;'� '- k Iii, `5 r�ov� i� • '� _ f, Emma ILI l 11,. i � 1 1.11 to Liberty at CreekSide : CA Ar= 0 mlma� 0■Emsmam is "all I i Pe� 76� Liberty on Bfuff Creek RI Non -Scannable ftm ....__ P C Folder Number 2 " Folder Name 05 Job Number Box Number D D 6 0 A ' 4 w 09 CITY OF CHANHASSEN A W 0-4 fn STAFF REPORT PC DATE: March 21, 2006 CC DATE: April 10, 2006, April 24, 2al May 22, 2006 REVIEW DEADLINE: June 30, 2006 CASE #: 05-24 BY: AF, RG, LH, ML, JS, ST PROPOSAL: Request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision of approximately 36.01 acres into 99 37 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District — LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE. LOCATION: East of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 (1500 Pioneer Trail) APPLICANT: Town & Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (952)944-3455 PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District, A2 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential — Medium Density (net density range 4.0 — 8.0 units/acre) ACREAGE: 36.01 gross acres 30.09 net acres DENSITY: 4.05 units/acre gross; 4.78 units/acre net SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a rezoning to PUD, subdivision and site plan approval to build 146 town homes with a conditional use permit for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District as well as grading within the floodplain. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUD's, and amendments to PUD's because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. if it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi judicial decision. Location Map Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 2 of 24 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The developer is requesting the rezoning of property from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Planned Unit Development — Residential, PUD -R, to permit a 146 -unit townhouse development on land guided for residential — medium density uses (net density range 4.0 — 8.0 units per acre); a subdivision of approximately 36.01 acres into 39 37 lots, 3 outlots, and public right-of-way; site plan approval for 146 townhouses consisting of 98 Premier units and 48 Concord units; and conditional use permits for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The site has a high point of 940 elevation located at the north property line. The site has a low point of 866 elevation adjacent to Bluff Creek which separates the northern and southern halves of the property. The land south of Bluff Creek is located entirely with the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Corridor and is proposed as an area for wetland mitigation and to be preserved as open space. To the north of the property is a wooded hill on the Fox parcel that is included in the Bluff Creek Primary Corridor which is intended to be preserved. To the northeast is a ponding and wetland mitigation area for MnDOT and the Highway 312 project. To the south is a future developable area that is guided for residential — medium density and office/industrial use. The parcel to the south will gain access via Pioneer Trail. The property to the west is being proposed for an 81 -lot single-family subdivision. As part of that development, the Bluff Creek Corridor is also being preserved. The initial access to the site will be from the northwest. This roadway crosses two other parcels and, therefore, must be coordinated with the development of those sites. As part of this development, we are also requiring that the developer establish a second means of access to the site. The most logical location is in the vicinity of the current farm road which runs to the north of the property just on the edge of the wooded hill. The developer will need to coordinate with MnDOT the design of this road. The developer will constructiee of the road, sinee it eannat be eempleted until to the Fox parcel to the north develeps. At that time When the Fox parcel develops, the road will be linked to the 2005 MUSA east -west collector road. The development consists of two housing types: 4 and 6 2 -unit Premiers and 6 -unit Concords. Within each housing type are four alternative living configurations. A color and material pallet will be established for each of the 29 buildings. Staff is recommending that Liberty at Creekside be approved. BACKGROUND On December 8, 2003, the City approved the 2005 MUSA Alternate Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). This document was intended to review and provide mitigation measures for all development within the 2005 MUSA area. At the time of development review, each property within the 2005 MUSA area is required to reimburse the city for their propositional share, based on the land area, of the costs for completion of the AUAR. This property is responsible for $6,285.00 as its portion of the 2005 AUAR. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 3 of 23 APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article IV, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article V, Floodplain Overlay District Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXIH, Division 9, Design Standards for Multifamily Developments Chapter 20, Article XXXI, Bluff Creek Overlay District REZONING The property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for Residential - Medium Density as well as parks and open space over the Bluff Creek corridor. Appropriate zonings for this land use designation include Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R), Mixed Low Density Residential, if twin homes (R4), Mixed Medium Density Residential (R8) or Low and Medium Density Residential (RLM). The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 36 acres from A2 to PUD -R, Planned Unit Development -R. The project consists of 146 townhouse units in 29 structures. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to permit density clustering for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for an internal transfer of density. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development and preserves the Bluff Creek corridor subject to the recommended modifications to the plan. The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 4 of 23 The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life -cycle. • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards govern the development of the property. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Liberty at Creekside Development Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a townhouse development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Ancillary uses may be permitted as listed below once a primary use has occupied the site. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to townhouses, including twin homes, and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on common area Outlots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include bus shelter, development signage, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter or playground equipment. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet Exterior (Perimeter) Lot Lines 50 feet Front Yard 10 feet Side Yard (end units) 10 feet # Rear Yard 10 feet # Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 20 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30 % * Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 16.5 feet and 40 feet Bluff Creek Primary zone boundary 40 feet with the first 20 feet as buffer Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 5 of 23 # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 30 percent site coverage. d. Building Materials and Design • Building height shall be limited to 35 feet • Building exterior material shall be a combination of vinyl siding or shake and brick, cut -face block or stone. • No two adjacent structures shall be of the same color scheme. • Colors used shall be varied across color tones. • All units shall utilize minimum timberline 25 -year shingles. • Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front landscape yard. • All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building, landscaping or decorative fencing. • Garage doors shall be decorative and have windows. SUBDIVISION REVIEW The applicant is proposing a 29 -lot subdivision with two common lots. Because this project is a PUD, there is not a minimum lot area. The overriding restriction is that the development complies with the density requirement of the comprehensive plan (4.0 — 8.0 units per acre), which it does at 5.21 units per acre. This plat configuration creates condominium units of each building. However, the applicant may final plat the lots for individual units rather than by structures, creating up to 146 lots. Preliminary discussions with the developer indicate that they may create individual lots for units in the Premier buildings. Staff is recommending that the common lots be platted as separate outlots and that the Bluff Creek Primary corridor south of the buildings be made in to a separate outlot. BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low -impact practices. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Bluff Creek runs through the southern third of this property. All structures must maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. The area within the Bluff Creek Overlay District south of Bluff Creek has been historically used for agricultural purposes. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Special attention should be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 6 of 23 FLOODPLAIN Alterations appear to be proposed within a mapped FEMA unnumbered A Zone (100 -year floodplain). In lieu of a Letter of Map Amendment, LOMA, the applicant will be required to obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Bluff Creek runs through the southwest comer of the 36 -acre site. Trees are along the north and south sides of the creek. The area lying south of the creek contains some steep slopes and wetland areas on the west and east side. The northern quarter of the property is a steep, vegetated area. The remainder of the property is a vegetated area with gentle slopes. The property lies within the 2005 MUSA Expansion study area. Mmley-Horn completed a study on the 2005 MUSA area which included street system analysis and proposed trunk utility alignments. Access to the proposed development will be from a local street that will extend the east -west collector identified in the report. The northern portion of this street lies outside of the plat boundary; therefore, the developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Pioneer Pass development to the west. The developer proposes to develop the area north of the creek. Due to the 70 -foot drop in elevation from the northern plat boundary to the edge of the Bluff Creek Overlay District Line, the entire area north of the Overlay District Line will be mass graded, with the exception of the portion of the property in the extreme northwest corner of the site. The proposed grading plan identifies a storm water pond on the east side of the property, berms in the southeast corner and retaining walls at the north property line (two-tiered), within Common Lot 18, Block 2 (a portion of which is two-tiered), south of Street A, north of Lot 12, Block 1, and south of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1. Staff will work with the developer's engineer to limit the number and height of retaining walls within the site. The grading plan must show the proposed top and bottom of wall elevations for all retaining walls. Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. The developer proposes to install storm sewer throughout the site to convey runoff from the development to the proposed pond. Staff will review hydrology calculations prior to final plat approval. The style of home and lowest floor elevation must be noted on the grading plan. Typical sections for each housing style must be shown on the final grading plan. The final grading plan must be 50 scale so that staff can complete a full review of the proposed grading. Bluff Creek runs through the southern third of this property. Protection of Bluff Creek from erosion and sediment discharge during all phases of construction is essential. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 7 of 23 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is needed for the development and must be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. It is recommended the SWPPP be submitted to the City and the Carver Soil and Water Conservation District (CSWCD) for review prior to final approval. Erosion Control A stable emergency overflow (EOF) is needed for the proposed pond. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail should be included the plan. It is unclear how the contractor will gain access to and between wetland mitigation areas. A temporary creek crossing may be needed unless access can be gained from the west or south. The plans should show paths of access to both wetland mitigation areas as well as all erosion controls and restoration practices. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. Sediment Control Curbside inlet control details are needed. Wimco-type inlet controls should be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. Typical building lot controls should be shown on the plan. These controls should include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. The proposed storm water pond should be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond should be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail is needed for the Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 8 of 23 temporary pond outlet. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. Storm Water Management It is recommended that the ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek be adjusted to discharge water parallel to the creek flow; presently the outlet is shown to discharge water perpendicular to the flow and could increase bank erosion of the creek. The outlet should be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEES Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on townhome development rates of $3,100/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 35.58 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $110,298. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Medium density residential developments have a connection charge of $4,400 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $156,552 for the proposed development. SWMP Credits This project proposes the construction of one NURP pond. The applicant will be credited for water quality where NURP basins are provided to treat runoff from the site. This will be determined upon review of the ponding and storm sewer calculations. Credits may also be applied to the applicant's SWMP fees for oversizing in accordance with the SWMP or the provision of outlet structures. No credit will be given for temporary pond areas. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $266,850. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 9 of 23 Phase Il Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. WETLANDS Existing Wetlands Two Ag(Urban wetlands exist on site. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. delineated the wetlands in May 2004. Wetland A is a Type 2/3 wetland located in the southwest corner of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass. No wetland impact is proposed. Wetland B is a Type 1/2 wetland adjacent to Bluff Creek that runs through the southern half of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass and box elder. No wetland impact is proposed. On May 12, 2004, City staff conducted an on-site review of the wetland delineation. The wetland boundary shown on the plans is consistent with staff recommendation. Wetland Creation Plans for Liberty on Bluff Creek, a nearby project proposed by the applicant for this project, rely upon the construction of two wetland mitigation areas on this site. The ...etlan,, - litigatien foo Wetland replacement must occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. The applicant received permission from the Army Corps of Engineers to complete the required compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts on Liberty on Bluff Creek within 1 year of the authorized fill as long as the LGU (the City of Chanhassen) receives a letter of credit adequate to cover the cost of mitigation if the developer does not construct the mitigation. The City received a letter of credit in the amount of $28,459 for this purpose. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek must be complete within one year of the authorized fill on Liberty on Bluff Creek. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. Wetland Issues Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 10 of 23 The applicant has proposed a secondary access through the MnDOT Right -Of -Way (ROW) to the north in the northeast portion of the property. This connection will impact the wetland mitigation that MnDOT intends to create within their ROW in this area, especially the mitigation of Type 7 wetlands. The applicant will be responsible for creating or securing sufficient wetland mitigation for MnDOT that will meet all conditions imposed on MnDOT and will be responsible for any and all fees associated with the redesign of the wetland mitigation areas in MnDOT ROW. The applicant should work closely with the City and MnDOT to ensure all conditions are met. BLUFFS Several areas on the property have been identified as areas with steep slopes (slopes greater than or equal to 30%). The plans should be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas must be preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations for the Liberty at Creekside development are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands and bluffs) 30.87 acres Total canopy area (excluding wetlands and bluffs) 5.40 acres Baseline canopy coverage 17.5% Minimum canopy coverage allowed 20%d or 6.2 acres Proposed tree preservation 14.2% or 4.39 acres Developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore the difference is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage (5.4-4.39) 1.01 acres Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement area 1.21 acre or 52,795 SF Total number of trees to be planted 48 trees Replacement required to meet 20% cover 32 trees (6.2-5.4)/ 1089 SF) A total of 80 trees are required for reforestation in the development. Applicant is proposing a total of 260 trees as a part of the landscaping plan. Additional landscaping required for the development includes buffer yard plantings along the east property line. The following table summarizes the minimum requirements: Required Proposed East property line - bufferyard. B, 495' 4 overstory 8 understory 13 overstory 21 understory Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 11 of 23 30' width 12 shrubs 32 shrubs East property line — 14 overstory 14 overstory bufferyard B, 707' 28 understory 28 understory 15' width 42 shrubs 42 shrubs Applicant meets minimum requirements for the bufferyard landscaping. Additional comments concerning landscaping and tree preservation include the need to extend fencing around the entire wetland mitigation areas that will be constructed on the south side. This fencing will protect the adjacent wooded areas. Fencing shall also be installed on either side of a single designated access road connecting the two mitigation areas so that during the construction of the ponds disturbance to the existing wetland is kept to one access road. The applicant will implement a restoration plan for the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The plan previously submitted to city staff for approval, dated 9/29/05 and titled `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' includes 75 bare -root trees including basswood, sugar maple, and red oak and MNDOT seed mixes 325 and 350. All trees shall be installed with tree tubes and mesh covers and mulched. The applicant shall submit full-sized plans with the final plat. UTILITIES Trunk sanitary sewer and watermain to serve the proposed development will be constructed with the 2005 MUSA Expansion Improvements, City Project 04-05. The proposed lateral watermain and sanitary sewer within the site cannot be extended until the trunk utilities have been installed. Lateral watermain will be stubbed to the northern stub of Street B and will be extended to the north when the Fox property develops. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges and the SAC charge at the time of building permit. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00/unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00/unit for watermain. The SAC charge is $1,625.00/unit. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. STREETS The site plan identifies two road connections to the development: one from the Pioneer Pass property to the west and one from the Fox property to the north. The developer's engineer must coordinate the site design for Liberty at Creekside with the preliminary design of Pioneer Pass, as shown on the drawings. Staff does not support the northern street connection to the Fox property. This access must be shifted to the east to the MNDOT right-of-way parcel and shall extend to the north property line of the MNDOT right of way parcel. The developer proposes to construct the following public streets: Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 12 of 23 • Street A, an east -west, 31 -foot wide local street within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way, and • Street B, a north -south, 31 -foot wide local street within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way. The site plan includes a 24 -foot wide private street to serve Lots 5-10, Block 1. A 31 -foot wide private cu -de -sac is proposed to serve Lots 1-9, Block 2. The proposed private cul-de-sac will be 91 feet in diameter, which meets the City's minimum standard for a cul-de-sac. The proposed private cul-de-sac is 500 feet long, which meets the ordinance requirements. Private stub streets will be constructed to serve Lots 10-17, Block 2. The developer has indicated that Lots 13 and 14 will be reoriented so that the front of the units will face north and south. The final plans must show the new orientation. The developer proposes to construct five-foot wide concrete sidewalks on the north side of Street A and the west side of Street B. A 10 -foot wide bituminous trail will be constructed along the north side of the creek. The site plan and final grading plan must identify this trail. PARKS AND RECREATION Parks The proposed Liberty at Creekside subdivision is located within the 2005 MUSA area at the edge of Bluff Creek and is proposed to be developed into 146 residential town homes. The city's Comprehensive Park Plan calls for one acre of usable park space to be set aside for every 75 residents. Liberty at Creekside, as proposed, will result in an estimated 292 new residents moving into Chanhassen. Therefore, this subdivision generates the need for 3.89 acres of new parkland. However, the Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that building a small park in every residential subdivision is undesirable and would result in an unmanageable municipal park system. To this end, the plan calls for neighborhood parks to be centrally located within housing regions with a maximum distance of one mile between neighborhood parks. This pooling of resources and land in order to centrally locate parks in specific park service areas results in the efficient use of limited capital and long-term maintenance dollars. In the case of the Liberty at Creekside proposal, the City is planning to provide neighborhood park amenities at a location approximately one-half mile to the west and south. Therefore, the City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication as a condition of this subdivision. Trails A variety of pedestrian improvements should be incorporated into the proposed Liberty at Creekside plat. Foremost is a ten -foot wide asphalt trail to be constructed adjacent to and paralleling the Bluff Creek Corridor. This important trail will need to be constructed on the north side of Bluff Creek at this location. This trail is currently not reflected in the plans submitted by the applicant. A rough sketch depicting the alignment for the creek trail was faxed to the applicant on February 9, 2006. Below is the applicant's preferred alignment. Additional pedestrian trails, sidewalks, and trail connectors also need to be incorporated into the project as required, including a sidewalk connection through the end of private street B. Design, engineering, installation and testing costs associated with these pedestrian improvements are the Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 13 of 23 responsibility of the applicant. The city will reimburse the applicant for the cost of construction materials only for the ten -foot wide Bluff Creek Trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the Bluff Creek Trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials utilized in construction of this trail segment. Preferred Trail Alignment LOT INFORMATION TABLE Area (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Housing Type Ll B1 10,811 130 85 Premier 4 -unit L2 B 1 10,958 132 86 Premier 4 -unit L3 BI 11,263 136 88 Premier 4 -unit L4 B 1 10,623 124 86 Premier 4 -unit L5 BI 10,624 126 85 Premier 4 -unit L6 BI 10,447 126 85 Premier 4 -unit L7 B1 10,577 120 83 Premier 4 -unit L8 B1 14,365 173 83 Premier 6 -unit L9 B1 13,458 130 85 Premier 4 -unit L10B1 13,126 132 85 Premier 4 -unit 1,11 Bl 14,568 176 83 Premier 6 -unit L12 B1 14,484 175 83 Premier 6 -unit Common Lot 13 853,879 (19.6 ac.) Ll B2 10,306 124 83 Premier 4 -unit L2 B2 14,709 152 84 Premier 6 -unit Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 14 of 23 GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The developer is proposing two housing products: Concord and Premier. The Concord product comes in four housing types ranging in size from 1,675 to 2,365 square feet. Each building consists of six units. The Concord is proposed as a lookout structure. Each unit has a two -car, rear -loaded garage. Each unit has a front stoop connected to a sidewalk system. There are eight Concord Buildings being proposed. The Premier product also comes in four housing types each with three levels of living area and ranging in size from 1,550 to 1,795 square feet. Buildings come in four and six -unit configurations. The Premier is proposed as either a full basement or walkout structure. There are a total of 21 Premier Buildings being proposed —14 four -unit and 7 six -unit structures. Sec. 20-1088. Architectural style. Architectural style shall not be restricted. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and in relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions of this section. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. Designs that are incompatible with their surroundings or intentionally bizarre or exotic are not acceptable. • Monotony of design, both within projects and between adjacent projects and its surroundings, is prohibited. Variation in detail, form, and sighting shall provide visual Area (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Housing Type L3 B2 14,919 180 83 Premier 6 -unit 14 B2 10,382 118 83 Premier 4 -unit L5 B2 10,647 122 88 Premier 4 -unit L6 B2 11,869 147 88 Premier 4 -unit L7 B2 14,526 185 83 Premier 6 -unit L8 B2 14,448 154 84 Premier 6 -unit L9 B2 10,968 132 183 Premier 4 -unit L10 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 -unit L11 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 -unit L12 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 L13 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 L14 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 L15 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 L16 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 L17 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 Common Lot 18 220,278 (5.06 ac.) Outlot A 18,814 (0.43 ac.) ROW 106,286 (2.44 ac.) Total 1,568,596 1 (36.01 ac.) GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The developer is proposing two housing products: Concord and Premier. The Concord product comes in four housing types ranging in size from 1,675 to 2,365 square feet. Each building consists of six units. The Concord is proposed as a lookout structure. Each unit has a two -car, rear -loaded garage. Each unit has a front stoop connected to a sidewalk system. There are eight Concord Buildings being proposed. The Premier product also comes in four housing types each with three levels of living area and ranging in size from 1,550 to 1,795 square feet. Buildings come in four and six -unit configurations. The Premier is proposed as either a full basement or walkout structure. There are a total of 21 Premier Buildings being proposed —14 four -unit and 7 six -unit structures. Sec. 20-1088. Architectural style. Architectural style shall not be restricted. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and in relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions of this section. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. Designs that are incompatible with their surroundings or intentionally bizarre or exotic are not acceptable. • Monotony of design, both within projects and between adjacent projects and its surroundings, is prohibited. Variation in detail, form, and sighting shall provide visual Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 15 of 23 interest. Site characteristics that may be used for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. • All building shall have a minimum of 20 percent of accent material. Accent material may include brick, stone cut face block or shakes. The use of any EFIS shall not be on the first story of any building or one story in height. Finding: The proposed development has been well sited within the site. It attempts to fit into the environment in which it is located including incorporating the site topography in building layouts, terracing down to Bluff Creek. The buildings offer much variety including colors, finishes, roof lines and materials. The buildings are oriented in multiple vectors to provide varying site lines and building elevations. Sec. 20-1089. Land use. All development shall create a unified design of internal order that provides desirable environments for site uses, visitors and the community. The following design elements shall be incorporated into a project: • The project shall create a unique neighborhood identity. • Creation of interconnecting neighborhoods in collaboration with adjoining landowners (street, walkways, preservation of natural features, parks and gathering places). • Each neighborhood has a focal point or gathering place including parks, greens, squares, entrance monuments, historic structures (silos/bams) or public furniture (gazebos, benches, pergolas). Community features may include: landscaping, lighting, benches, tables • Recreation facilities (playgrounds, tot lots, swimming pools and gardens). • Diversity of product type and design to accommodate different age groups and individuals in different socio -economics circumstances. • Broad variety of housing choices --twin homes, row houses, town homes, flats above garages, apartments over shops, garden apartments, senior living opportunities and condominiums. Findings: The project creates its own little unique enclave. Tucked away within the Bluff Creek Corridor with preserved natural areas on its north, south and west, this neighborhood is isolated, yet connected through roads and trails, to the rest of the community. Common areas around private street B and between Lots 6 and 7, Block 2 provide opportunities for focal points or gathering places. There are potentially up to 16 different living area configurations within the project, providing diversity in housing types to accommodate many different individuals. See. 20-1090. Curb appeal. To encourage roadway image or curb appeal projects shall create a variety of building orientation along the roadways; attractive streetscape and architectural detail. All projects shall incorporate two or more of the following design elements: Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 16 of 23 • Orientation to the street or access road: • Setbacks ■ Spacing between buildings and view sheds. • Architectural detail/decorative features. ■ Windows. ■ Flower boxes. • Porches, balconies, private spaces. ■ Location and treatment of entryway. ■ Surface materials, finish and texture. ■ Roof pitch. ■ Building height and orientation. • Location of garages. • Landscaping including fencing and berming. • Street lighting. • Screening of parking, especially in apartment and condominium developments. • Variations/differentiations in units including, but not limited to, color, material, articulation etc. Findings: The proposed development has been well sited within the site. It attempts to fit into the environment in which it is located including incorporating the site topography in building layouts, terracing down to Bluff Creek. The buildings offer much variety including colors, finishes, roof lines and materials. The buildings are oriented in multiple vectors to provide varying site lines and building elevations. Sec. 20-1091. Transportation diversity. All developments shall be incorporate multi -modal transportation including two or more of the following elements: • Streets with trails incorporated. • Off road trials and bike paths. • Provisions for mass transit with bus stops and shelters incorporated into the developments. • Sidewalk connecting internal developments. ■ Undulating sidewalks. Use of pavers or stamped concrete. On -street parking and use of roundabouts. Landscaped boulevards or medians. Findings: The proposed development offers two directions of access to the site as well as walking and biking opportunities in both sidewalks and its connection to the Bluff Creek Trail system. Sec. 20-1092. Integration of parks, open space, natural historic or cultural resources. • Integrate nature and wildlife with urban environment. 0 Trails and sidewalks. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 17 of 24 ■ Vistas. • Historic features. Preservation of natural features that support wildlife and native plants (slopes, trees, wetlands). Findings: The proposed development is preserving the Bluff Creek Overlay District in the southern half of the site. In addition, trail connections to the Bluff Creek Trail system are proposed. The units in Lot 14, Block 2, as well as individuals on the sidewalk will have an overlook into the Bluff Creek Corridor. The terracing of the site provides additional opportunities for residents to overlook the Bluff Creek Corridor. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the following four motions and adoption of the attached findings of fact and recommendation: A. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within this staff report." B. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around each dwelling unit ,subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall prepare a noise analysis for noise that will be generated by traffic on Highway 312. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which shall be implemented by the developer. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. 3. The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as their portion of the 2005 AUAR. 4. The developer shall revise the plat to incorporate the twin home units as shown on the plan dated May 8, 2006 . 5. The developer shall establish a separate outlot(s) for the land within the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone. 6. Dedication of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone shall be made to the city or a conservation easement shall be established over said outlot(s). Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 18 of 23 7. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be complete within one year of the authorized fill on Liberty on Bluff Creek. 8. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. 9. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. Due to a secondary access through the MnDOT right-of-way (ROW) to the north in the northeast portion of the property, the applicant will be responsible for creating or securing sufficient wetland mitigation for MnDOT that will meet all conditions imposed on MnDOT and will be responsible for any and all fees associated with the redesign of the wetland mitigation areas in MnDOT ROW. Final plat approval shall not be granted until the wetland mitigation plan has been received and approved by the City and MnDOT. 11. The plans shall be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas shall be preserved. In addition, all structures shall maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading shall occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 12. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations shall occur within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. 13. The applicant shall submit a plan for the revegetation of the farmed area south of Bluff Creek that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Special attention shall be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). 14. Alterations appear to be proposed within a mapped FEMA unnumbered A Zone (100 - year floodplain). In lieu of a LOMA, the applicant shall obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain. 15. A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) shall be developed for the development and shall be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. 16. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the proposed pond. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail shall be included the plan. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 19 of 23 17. The plans shall show paths of access to both wetland mitigation areas as well as all erosion controls and restoration practices. 18. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tyne of Sloe Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 19. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 20. The applicant shall provide details for curbside inlet control. Wimco-type inlet controls shall be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. 21. Typical building lot controls shall be shown on the plan. These controls may include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. 22. The proposed storm water pond shall be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond shall be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail for the temporary pond outlet shall be included in the plans. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. 23. The ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek shall be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. 24. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. 25. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $266,850. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 20 of 23 26. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. 27. Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to construction around all areas designated for preservation and/or at the edge of proposed grading limits. 28. Silt fence or tree protection fencing shall be installed at the edge of grading around both wetland mitigation areas. 29. A fenced access road will lead from the east mitigation area to the west mitigation area. This will be the only access allowed to the western site. Fencing shall be placed on either side of the access lane. After construction, the access lane shall be restored according to the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan'. 30. A walk-through inspection of the silt/tree preservation fence shall be required prior to construction. 31. No burning permits shall be issued for tree removal. All trees removed on site shall be chipped and used on site or hauled off. 32. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 33. The applicant shall submit a full sized 'Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 34. A turf plan shall be submitted to the city indicating the location of sod and seeding areas. 35. The developer shall pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final plat approval in lieu of parkland dedication. 36. The applicant shall provide all design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the "Bluff Creek Trail." All construction documents shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be ten feet in width, surfaced with bituminous material and constructed to meet all City specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed for the actual cost of construction materials for the Bluff Creek Trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials utilized in its construction. 37. The developer shall provide a sidewalk connection to the Bluff Creek trail through private street B. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 21 of 23 38. The developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Pioneer Pass (Peterson Property) and Degler property developments to the west and northwest. 39. The height and length of retaining walls must be reduced to the maximum extent possible. 40. The top and bottom of wall elevations must be shown on the final grading plan. 41. A building permit is required for any retaining walls four feet high or taller. These walls must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 42. The style of home and lowest floor elevation must be noted on the grading plan. 43. Typical sections for each housing style must be shown on the final grading plan. 44. The final grading plan must be 50 scale so that staff can complete a full review of the proposed grading. 45. The developer must verify the invert elevation of the sanitary sewer connection that will be constructed with the 2005 MUSA Improvement Project. 46. The development may not proceed until the Phase II 2005 MUSA utility extension project has been awarded. 47. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges and the SAC charge at the time of building permit. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00/unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00/unit for watermain. The SAC charge is $1,625.00/unit. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 48. The northern access (currently shown to the Fox property) must be shifted to the east to the MNDOT right-of-way parcel. Prior to final plat approval, the developer must contact the Fox family to coordinate the elevation of the northern street connection at their property line. 49. The Arterial Collector Fee shall be paid with the final plat. The 2006 fee is $2,400/developable acre. 50. The final plans must show the new orientation for Lots 13 and 14, Block 2. 51. The site plan and final grading plan must identify the proposed 10 -foot wide bituminous trail. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 22 of 23 C. "The Chanhassen City Council approves P4@Rvi%g Gowminiss` app -a-1 -1 Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. 3. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire - resistive construction. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. 7. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 8. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 9. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 10. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 11. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required on the private streets. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of sign. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991. 12. Staff will work with the developer on materials, colors and diversity. 13. The developer shall incorporate the twin home units as proposed in the sketch plan dated May 8,2006." Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 23 of 23 D. "The Chanhassen City Council approves Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 2. The applicant shall submit a full-sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 3. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. 4. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. 5. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Extension Letter from Shawn Siders to Bob Generous dated January 9, 2006. 4. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat. 5. Reduced Copy Site Plan. 6. Concord Collection Product Elements. 7. Concord Elevation. 8. Premier Collection Product Elements. 9. Premier Building Elevations. 10. Revised Preliminary Plat Submission for Liberty at Creekside dated 6/14/05. 11. Northern Street Connection Schematic. 12. Liberty at Creekside Site Section. 13. Letter from Aaron Mlynek, SWCD, to Kate Aanenson dated 2/23/06. 14. Memo from Mark Littfin to Robert Generous dated 2/23/06. 15. Letter from Juanita Voigt, MnDOT, to Bob Generous dated 7/27/05. 16. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. g1plant2005 planning casest05-24 liberty at amicsid6staff report revised pud.doc 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION Application of Town & Country Homes: Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision of approximately 36.01 acres into 37 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The property is located east of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 (1500 Pioneer Trail) — LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE. On March 21, 2006, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Town & Country Homes for a townhouse project. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Medium Density uses. The legal description of the property is: (See attached Exhibit A). 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city s service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) effects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city s comprehensive plan; C. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant adverse environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: (1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. (2) Lack of adequate roads. (3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. (4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 6. When approving a conditional use permit, the City must determine the capability of a proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the conditional use Section 20.232, include the following 12 items: a. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. The proposed development will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. c. The proposed development will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. The proposed development will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed development will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed development will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed development will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. The proposed development will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed development will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. The proposed development will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Articles IV, V and VI of the Chanhassen City Code. Site Plan Review requires that the proposed development: a. Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. Is consistent with Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review of the Chanhassen City Code; c. Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; d. Creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. Creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: (1) An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; (2) The amount and location of open space and landscaping; (3) Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and (4) Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 8. The planning report #05-24 dated March 21, 2006, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. 9flt]616 1 DWI 17_V Y DRI The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Rezoning of property from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Planned Unit Development — Residential, PUD - R; Subdivision of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 21' day of March, 2006. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION IM Its Chairman 4 TOWN May 1, 2006 Mr. Bob Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Dear Mr. Generous: Mir & COUNTRY HOMES A lt. ammmnn' compmy This letter will serve as Town & Country Homes request to extend the approval period for the Liberty at Creek Side development until June 30, 2006. It is our intention to modify the application and submit those items to the city for consideration at the May 22, 2006 City Council meeting. Thank you for your continued cooperation. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-253-0460. Very truly 74' Shawn Siders Community Planning cc: Kevin Clark, Vice President of Land Development Rick Janssen, Vice President of Land Acquisition 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 • Eden Praine, Minnesota 55344 • Phone 952-944-3455 • Fax 952-944-3437 • www townandcountryhomesmn com Minnesota Builder #20539403 S 020543466 Chanhassen City Council - May 9, 2011 received potted plants as well so, Tiana on behalf of the City and the Environmental Commission I'd like to present you with this certificate and your grand prize award and congratulate you for your pretty picture. Tiana Connelly: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: You're welcome. You're welcome. And if J.R. Relick is here. Good evening. Tonight I'd like to present J.R. with this Certificate of Appreciation from the City of Chanhassen. J.R. was appointed to the Environmental Commission in 2008 and served 3 years on the commission. During that time he brought creativity and passion and commitment to the commission and all their activities. While serving on the commission he contributed to many activities and accomplishments of the commission including environmental stewardship within our city with an Environmental Excellence Award program and other activities, promoting the Arbor Day Poster Contest. We just saw this year's recipient among fifth graders. Revitalizing Arbor Day, which we just celebrated in our city here this last Saturday with the spirit of the day and planting trees and donated much of his time and talent for public education on July 3rd and July 0' events. So J.R. on behalf of the City Council and all the residents, thank you for your service. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council approves the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated April 25, 2011 -City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated April 25, 2011 Receive Commission Minutes: -Planning Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated April 19, 2011 b. Resolution#2011-26: 2011 Street Improvement Project I 1-01: Approve Change Order No. 1 Concerning Tree Removal and Landscaping. C. Powers Crossing Professional Center: Approve One -Year Extension of Preliminary Plat, Tim Erhart. d. Liberty at Creekside: Approve One -Year Extension of Preliminary Plat, B. Elmer Farms, LLC (Bruce Jeurissen). e. Resolution#2011-27: Chanhassen Village Apartments Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project Nos. 11-02-1 and 11-02-2: Approve Quotes. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. SCANNED Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 Park & Recreation or b�enerousAci.chanhassen mn us. Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 9522271110 Sincerely, RecreationCenter Coulter 2310 Coulterer Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.2271404 Robert Generous, AICP Planning & Senior Planner Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Enclosure Fax: 952.2271110 May 11, 2011 CITY OF Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer CHAUSEN Todd Gerhardt, City Manager PFax:952-22271300 Fax: �i22271310 Mr. Bruce Jeurissen 7700 Market Boulevard B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC PBox Chanhassen, MNN 55317 19450 281st Street Phone: 952.227.1125 Belle Plaine, MN 56011-5010 Administration Re: Liberty at Creekside PFax:952.22271100 Fax: 952.2271110 Planning Case #05-24 Building Inspections Dear Mr. Jeurissen: Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 This letter is to inform you that on May 9, 2011, the Chanhassen City Council Engineering approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2012 for the preliminary plat for Phone: 952.2271160 Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24. Fax: 952.2271170 Final plat documents must be submitted to the City thirty (30) days prior to the Finance City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Phone: 952.2271140 Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final Fax:952 271110 plat. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 Park & Recreation or b�enerousAci.chanhassen mn us. Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 9522271110 Sincerely, RecreationCenter Coulter 2310 Coulterer Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.2271404 Robert Generous, AICP Planning & Senior Planner Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Enclosure Fax: 952.2271110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.nn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Public Works Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer 7901 Park Place Todd Gerhardt, City Manager PFax:952-22271300 Fax: �i22271310 Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-24 liberty at creekside\eztension letter prelim plat 2011.doc Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.nn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29.06 g:\eng\form\final plat submittal.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to CITYOF City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: CHAIVIIASSEN 1. Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. 7700 Market Boulevard • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities PO Box 147 (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must Chanhassen. MN 55317 show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, Administration wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, Phone. 952.227.1100 EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. Fax 952.227.1110 • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. Building Inspections • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. Phone: 952.2271180 Fax: 952.227.1190 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and Engineering contributing areas to catch basins. Phone: 952.2271160 Fax: 952.227.1170 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. Finance : Phone952.227.1140 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). Fax 952.227.1110 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). Park & Recreation Phone: 952.2271120 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: Fax: 952.2271110 a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. Recreation Center c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and 2310 Coulter Boulevard maintenance. Phone: 952.227.1400 d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. Fax: 952.2271404 e. Erosion control. Planning & f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). Natural Resources g. Site grading Phone: 952.227.1130 h. Street lights & signs Fax: 952.227.1110 i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping Public Works 7901 Park Place 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8%' x 11"), and Phone: 952.2271300 a digital copy in Aif format. Fax: 952.227.1310 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 9. Lot tabulations Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29.06 g:\eng\form\final plat submittal.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow CITY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax:952.2271110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.2271180 Fax: 952227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 9522271110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.2271300 Fax: 952227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 0 April 1, 2011 Mr. Peter I Brennan, General Counsel NDI Minnesota, LLC 12 Salt Creek Lane, Suite 200 Hinsdale, IL 60521-8611 Or, B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC 19450 281s' Street Belle Plaine, MN 56011-5010 Re: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case #05-24 Dear Mr. Brennan: 0 On April 12, 2010, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2011, for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24. Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City thirty (30) days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Should you neither request a final plat approval or request an extension of the preliminary plat, the preliminary plat shall become null and void. Any future development of the site would require a new development review. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or benerous iPci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincere Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager g\plan\2005 planning cases\05-24 liberty at creeksid6notice of preliminary plat exp 2011dm Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED CM OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: May 9, 2011 SUBJ: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case #05-24 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 22, 2012 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 The property owner, B. Elmer Farms, LLC, is requesting another one-year extension Fax: 952.227.1110 of the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside to May 22, 2012. This project was Park & Recreation originally taken through the development review process by Town & Country Phone: 952.227.1120 Homes. The extension is necessary due to the current depressed market conditions Fax: 952.227.1110 for residential development and construction, and the lack of development on adjacent properties through which access to this property must be made. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax:952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Section 1841 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat. Staff can attest to the slowdown in the residential housing market. Additionally, the right-of-way from Bluff Creek Boulevard to the adjacent property has not been dedicated and the recording of the final plat for the Pioneer Pass development, immediately west of the site, has not been completed, which included the right-of-way providing access to this property. The City and developer worked diligently to create a well-designed project with diverse housing styles. There have been no amendments to the City Code that would adversely affect the conditions of approval for the Liberty at Creekside development. All the conditions of approval shall remain in force for the development. All fees were specified as those in effect at the time of final plat approval. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for a one-year extension to May 22, 2012. SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing forTodayand Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt Liberty at Creekside May 9, 2011 Page 2 of 3 BACKGROUND The Chanhassen City Council approved one-year extensions to the preliminary plat on April 12, 2010, June 8, 2009, April 28, 2008, and May 29, 2007. On May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report. B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around each dwelling unit. C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, and revised April 6, 2006. D. Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Todd Gerhardt Liberty at Creekside May 9, 2011 Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 22, 2012for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24." ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map. 2. Letter from Bruce E. Jeurissen to Robert Generous Dated April 26, 2011. 3. Reduced Copy Preliminary Sketch Plan. 4. 2005 Open Space, Trail and Development Areas Map. gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-24 liberty at creekside\extension memo preliminary plat 2011 doc Location Map Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen B. E:LMER FARMS, LLC 19450 281 ST AvE BELLE PL.AINE, MN 5601 1 April 26, 2011 By Fax and U.S. Mail (952) 227-1110 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen Planning Case No. 05-24 Request for Extension Dear Mr. Generous: RECEIVED APR 2 6 2011 CITY OF CHANHASSEN On behalf of B. Elmer Farms LLC, I am writing to request a one (1) year extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Liberty at Creek Side development, which I understand would extend the current approval to May 22, 2012. This extension is necessary in light of current depressed market condition impacting residential development and construction and lack of development on adjoining and nearby parcels. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information to support the requested extension. Very truly, A Bruce E. J issen, President B. Elmer Farms, LLC OR WAFAAMMA'. G 2005 OPEN SPACE, TRAIL &DEVELOPMENT AREAS ^� PROPOSED TRAM D RRce ED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK Q PROPOSEDPRNATERMIUCPER SPACE t R.wRrMWJCMAHIS) :r i J t % OR WAFAAMMA'. G 2005 OPEN SPACE, TRAIL &DEVELOPMENT AREAS ^� PROPOSED TRAM D RRce ED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK Q PROPOSEDPRNATERMIUCPER SPACE 41 05 -dq 6. Dedication of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone shall be made to the city or a conservation easement shall be established over said outlot(s). 7. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be complete within one year of the authorized fill on Liberty on Bluff Creek. SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding bails, and beautiful parks. A goat place to live, work, and play. May 24, 2006 Mr. Shawn Siders CITY OF Town & Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 CIMf111JSEN 10M1arrktettfBooulleevaard Eden Prairie, MN 55344 nll00 Re: Liberty at Creekside PBox 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Planning Case 05-24 g Administration Dear Mr. Siders: Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 This letter is to confirm that on May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council Building Inspections approved the following: Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development Engineering with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Phone: 952.227.1160 Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Fax: 952.227.1170 Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design Finance standards contained within this staff report. Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax:952221.1110 B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Park 8 Recreation Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, Phone: 952227.1120 revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around Fax:952.227.1110 each dwelling unit, subject to the following conditions: Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 1. The applicant shall prepare a noise analysis for noise that will be Fax: 952.227.1404 generated by traffic on Highway 312. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for Planning b Natural Resources residential homes ass specified b the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, � y g y+ Phone: 952.227.1130 which shall be implemented by the developer. Fax: 952.227.1110 Public worts 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and 1591 Park Road architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. Phone: 952227.1300 Fax 952.227.1310 3. The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as their portion of the 2005 AUAR. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 4. The developer shall revise the plat to incorporate the twin home units as Fax: 952.227.1110 shown on the plan dated May 8, 2006. Web She www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 5. The developer shall establish a separate outlot(s) for the land within the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone. 6. Dedication of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone shall be made to the city or a conservation easement shall be established over said outlot(s). 7. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be complete within one year of the authorized fill on Liberty on Bluff Creek. SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding bails, and beautiful parks. A goat place to live, work, and play. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 2 of 7 8. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for liberty on Bluff Creek. 9. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. Due to a secondary access through the MnDOT right-of-way (ROW) to the north in the northeast portion of the property, the applicant will be responsible for creating or securing sufficient wetland mitigation for MnDOT that will meet all conditions imposed on MnDOT and will be responsible for any and all fees associated with the redesign of the wetland mitigation areas in MnDOT ROW. Final plat approval shall not be granted until the wetland mitigation plan has been received and approved by the City and MnDOT. 11. The plans shall be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas shall be preserved. In addition, all structures shall maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading shall occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 12. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations shall occur within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. 13. The applicant shall submit a plan for the revegetation of the farmed area south of Bluff Creek that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Special attention shall be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). 14. Alterations appear to be proposed within a mapped FEMA unnumbered A Zone (100 - year floodplain). In lieu of a LOMA, the applicant shall obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain. 15. A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) shall be developed for the development and shall be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. 16. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the proposed pond. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail shall be included the plan. 17. The plans shall show paths of access to both wetland mitigation areas as well as all Z, erosion controls and restoration practices. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 3 of 7 18. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: TyM of Slone Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 19. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 20. The applicant shall provide details for curbside inlet control. Wimco-type inlet controls shall be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. 21. Typical building lot controls shall be shown on the plan. These controls may include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. 22. The proposed storm water pond shall be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond shall be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail for the temporary pond outlet shall be included in the plans. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. 23. The ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek shall be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. 24. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and stone water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. 25. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $266,850. 26. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 4 of 7 27. Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to construction around all areas designated for preservation and/or at the edge of proposed grading limits. 28. Silt fence or tree protection fencing shall be installed at the edge of grading around both wetland mitigation areas. 29. A fenced access road will lead from the east mitigation area to the west mitigation area. This will be the only access allowed to the western site. Fencing shall be placed on either side of the access lane. After construction, the access lane shall be restored according to the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan'. 30. A walk-through inspection of the silt1tree preservation fence shall be required prior to construction. 31. No burning permits shall be issued for tree removal. All trees removed on site shall be chipped and used on site or hauled off. 32. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 33. The applicant shall submit a full sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 34. A turf plan shall be submitted to the city indicating the location of sod and seeding areas. 35. The developer shall pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final plat approval in lieu of parkland dedication. 36. The applicant shall provide all design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the `Bluff Creek Trail" All construction documents shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be ten feet in width, surfaced with bituminous material and constructed to meet all City specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed for the actual cost of construction materials for the Bluff Creek Trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials utilized in its construction. 37. The developer shall provide a sidewalk connection to the Bluff Creek trail through private street B. 38. The developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Pioneer Pass (Peterson Property) and Degler property developments to the west and northwest. 39. The height and length of retaining walls must be reduced to the maximum extent possible. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 5 of 7 40. The top and bottom of wall elevations must be shown on the final grading plan. 41. A building permit is required for any retaining walls four feet high or taller. These walls must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 42. The style of home and lowest floor elevation must be noted on the grading plan. 43. Typical sections for each housing style must be shown on the final grading plan. 44. The final grading plan must be 50 scale so that staff can complete a full review of the proposed grading. 45. The developer must verify the invert elevation of the sanitary sewer connection that will be constructed with the 2005 MUSA Improvement Project. 46. The development may not proceed until the Phase II 2005 MUSA utility extension project has been awarded. 47. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges and the SAC charge at the time of building permit. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00/unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00/unit for watermain. The SAC charge is $1,625.00/unit. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 48. The northern access (currently shown to the Fox property) must be shifted to the east to the MNDOT right-of-way parcel. Prior to final plat approval, the developer must contact the Fox family to coordinate the elevation of the northern street connection at their property line. 49. The Arterial Collector Fee shall be paid with the final plat. The 2006 fee is $2,400/developable acre. 50. The final plans must show the new orientation for Lots 13 and 14, Block 2. 51. The site plan and final grading plan must identify the proposed 10 -foot wide bituminous trail. C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 6 of 7 3. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire - resistive construction. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. 7. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 8. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 9. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 10. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 11. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required on the private streets. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of sign. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991. 12. Staff will work with the developer on materials, colors and diversity. 13. The developer shall incorporate the twin home units as proposed in the sketch plan dated May 8, 2006. D. Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff reek Overlay District subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 2. The applicant shall submit a full-sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. W. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 7 of 7 3. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. 4. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. 5. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. Enclosed is a site plan agreement that must be executed by Town & Country Homes. If there is a separate property owner, they will need to sign the consent page at the end of the agreement. If there is a separate mortgage holder, they will need to sign the mortgage holder consent page. Return the agreement to me for city execution and recording at Carver County within 120 days of the final plat approval. The executed site plan agreement and required security specified in the site plan agreement shall be submitted prior to the City issuing a building permit. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City three weeks prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosures ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-24 liberty at a kside\appmval letter preliminaryAm CITY OF CHANHASSEN S1TE PLAN PERMIT #05-24 SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated May 22, 2006, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and Town & Country Homes (the 'Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for 146 townhouses, (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described as Liberty at Creekside. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A --Site Plan plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006. Plan B—Grading Plan plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006. Plan C—Landscaping Plan plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006. I Plan D --Utility Plans plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by November 15, 2008. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $5,000.00 (boulevard restorationlerosion control). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said landscaping. PROCEDURES FOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Mr. Shawn Siders Town & Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 2 7. Other Special Conditions. (Site plan approval conditions) a. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. b. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. c. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire -resistive construction. d. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. e. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. f. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. g. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. h. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. i. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. j. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. k. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required on the private streets. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of sign. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy 1106-1991. 1. Staff will work with the developer on materials, colors and diversity. in. The developer shall incorporate the twin home units as proposed in the sketch plan dated May 8, 2006. 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. [•tlrsry.r�u�r:�y�u Ilya ULN 113 Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager DEVELOPER: NIN Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_day of , 200_, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. 4 1►C•5IYAWdW03#CO STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of _ 200_ by of Town & Country Homes. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STIR PLAN PERMIT GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the 1 erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authroize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attomeys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmasters request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall nun with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall 3 not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws. Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1). City of Chanhassen; 2). State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3). United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4). Watershed District; 5). Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils ox the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the H property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of 200_ LIM STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200_ , by DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 0 NOTARY PUBLIC MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE PLAN AGREEMENT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Agreement, agrees that the Site Plan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _ day of 20_ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20-1 by DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 7 I►• :i ' 1: Approved May 22, 2006 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Liberty at Creekside Development Standards i a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a townhouse development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Ancillary uses may be permitted as listed below once a primary use has occupied the site. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to townhouses, including twin homes, and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on common area Outlots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include bus shelter, development signage, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter or playground equipment. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards lEghway 212 50 feet Exterior (Perimeter) Lot Lines 50 feet Front Yard 10 feet Side Yard (end units) 10 feet # Rear Yard 10 feet # Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 20 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30 Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 16.5 feet and 40 feet Bluff Creek Primary zone boundary 40 feet with the first 20 feet as buffer # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage_ Individual lots will exceed the 30 percent site coverage. d. Building Materials and Design • Building height shall be limited to 35 feet • Building exterior material shall be a combination of vinyl siding or shake and brick, cut -face block or stone. • No two adjacent structures shall be of the same color scheme. • Colors used shall be varied across color tones. • All units shall utilize minimum timberline 25 -year shingles. • Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front landscape yard. • All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building, landscaping or decorative fencing. • Garage doors shall be decorative and have windows. CITY OF CHANHASSEN ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of three (3) weeks prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of full size construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Public Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8'h" x 11"), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc or .pdf compatible format. 9. Lot tabulations 10. 1" = 200' scale paper or mylar reduction of the final plat with just street names and Lot and Block numbers. 11. Legal description of the property/properties to be platted. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 02-03-% gAeng4o"sVinal plat submittal.doc os-oy City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 Councilman Lundquist: Motion to approve as published. Councilman Peterson: Second. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Made and seconded. Any discussion on that motion? Resolution #2006-38: Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilman Peterson seconded that the City Council award the bids to Griffm, Kubik, Stephens and Thompson and adopt the resolution providing for the issuance and sale of $6,640,000 General Obligation Improvement Bond, Series 2006A. DISTRICT. Kate Aanenson: Thank you Mayor. This item was tabled on your April 24`6 meeting. Since that time the staff has been working with Town and Country Homes to revise the site plan and the building elevations. The direction you gave staff and the applicant was to look at the views specifically from 212 and try to differentiate this project from the project that was recently approved on the Audubon Road side. So in working with the developer, they did introduce, on the previous plan had, both plans have 146 units. The previous plan had 29 structures. This plan has 37, and that was accomplished by adding the twin homes and breaking apart the fourplexes. This is a preliminary plat. There are motions starting on page 17 of your staff report. I just want to clarify, you will see this project again as that moves forward with the conditions that are addressed. I would like to turn it over to the developer and to go specifically through the changes that they made and the color scheme, so with that again as I indicated, staff is recommending approval with the conditions in the staff report. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any questions for staff? If not, I see the developer here. Good evening. Shawn Siders: Good evening Mayor Furlong, council members. My name is Shawn Siders with Town and Country Homes. A K. Hovnanian Company. With me this evening is Kevin Clark our Vice President of Land Development. We'd like to thank you for working with and challenging us to enhance the Liberty at Creekside community so it is a source of pride for the residents of Chanhassen now and in the future. I'd like to take a few moments to provide a brief overview of the modifications we have made to the plan since we last met with you. Provide additional information regarding the architecture that will be used on the Premiere Homes throughout the neighborhood and also provide a perspective from the 212 corridor once it is constructed. Since we met with you in April we have eliminated actually the 7 six unit Premiere buildings that were proposed for the site. In their place we have introduced 11 twin home Premiere buildings creating additional breaks in the buildings which will provide more view 17 OCANNEO City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 sheds throughout the neighborhood. On the south section of the neighborhood we've been able to introduce a 4-2-4 home configuration of the Premiere units to create a more varied streetscape, and I don't know if you can see this or not but the twin homes are all I believe in red. Because of the introduction of the twin home units we have also been able to break up the visitor parking spaces within private street C which is a private street on the north edge of the property. The parking areas are now dispersed on either end of the street and will allow for parking choices closer to the residents and their visitors on both ends of the street. The Premiere homes offer three distinct architectural styles which will be used in both the twin homes as well as the four unit buildings. The mission style has brick on four sides of the building. In addition to the four sided brick, these homes have a mixture of hip roofs on the front and rear that provide additional architectural detail. As is the case with all of our homes within this community, the varied color treatments on the front and rear ensure a varied streetscape and prevent monotony and we provided a rendering of both the twin and the four unit. The Victoria style Premiere homes have varied gables with eyebrows to break up the roof lines. The batting board pattern on the rears of these homes further distinguishes the Victorian home from the others, while the trim placement and color treatments enhance each unit. The farmhouse style Premiere homes offer stone treatments on the fronts and the sides, the wrap around porch distinguishes these homes from the others, while the gabled features on the rears of the homes break up the roof lines. We understand the need to create a varied streetscape within the community. In addition to the modified side layout, we will develop the site using all six color schemes on the Premiere homes. Because the number of Concord units within the development are limited, we would suggest dedicating three color schemes for those homes. And then lastly, during our previous discussions there have been many questions regarding the views of this community from the 212 corridor. We've taken this opportunity to provide a perspective from the closest point of the development to the 212 corridor. The home shown in this rendering are east of private street D, and are approximately 250 feet away from 212. As you can see the varied architectural styles and color treatments in addition to the extensive landscaping will ensure the views from 212 are visually appealing. I would like to take this opportunity to thank yourselves and city staff for your collective vision to challenge Town and Country Homes to create a distinct community. Liberty at Creekside will be a valuable asset to the community and we are proud to be a partner with the City of Chanhassen. I'd be happy to answer any questions you might have. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Siders? No? Very good. Thank you. Anything else for staff at this point? If not, council discussion. Thoughts or comments. Councilman Lundquist: I'll go first. I like the changes and modifications that have been made to the proposal. I think that the developer heard our feedback from before. Still you know, I still have, share some or have some concerns about things like the road access and the access to the park and some of that stuff from the meeting a month ago hasn't changed. But as I said, a month ago I mean those aren't deal breakers for me. I mean they're less than perfect things but we're going to have that in most developments. We're not going to have everything so, we talked a little bit 2 weeks ago about impact of one development on another and I think that as we look at the road that goes to the northwest, obviously meets up with the one through there and so then that, we had the discussion a month ago. Do we go straight south or do we go northeast from there and again you know we've heard all the different discussions so that said, the northeast seems to be the least intrusive. Maybe not ideal but nothing in the development right now that is 18 City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 jumping up and down for me to say no so I think I'll give the developer credit for breaking up the barracks look and 600 of the same units, like we talked about a month ago and comfortable with where we're at now. Knowing that it's not perfect but I think we're in a pretty good spot right now. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Other thoughts. Councilwoman Tjomhom: You know I just would like to thank Town and Country for what you did. I think I know I've probably been your worst nightmare ... but I just really, I love what you did. The changes that you made. The architectural changes that you made. The reconfiguration. The different styles that you've used as far as housing type... I just want to thank you for that because it's going to be a good asset to our community right now. And I guess that's all... Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilman Peterson. Councilman Peterson: ...we have a better product... something about the sheer scope of Phase I and Phase 11. You can't not because... so that's why I think we need to work harder to make it both visually attractive from 312 and ... so it's not exactly the same as Phase I. That was my goal ... few weeks ago, few months ago ... the changes and reinforce the fact that they listened... Mayor Furlong: Thank you. I think my thoughts are similar to what has been expressed by the council. This council challenged Mr. Clark and Siders, your development with Liberty on Bluff Creek to give us something better. Show us something more. I think we pushed to the limit there in terms of that development, and I see here where we've done even better and each development that goes in, I've always kind of used as a gauge, if this becomes the one on your marketing brochure, then we've got that you know. Then we've done enough. If you've got somebody else's on there ... maybe there's more we can do. I think overall, in all seriousness, I appreciate your professionalism in working with the staff. Listening to the council. Working with the Planning Commission to try to find something that works for you but also works for us and that makes a big difference. Others might have dug in their heels and said, no. This is it. I'm not going to do anything more. You didn't do that and we appreciate that and I think because of that, where a few weeks ago had we put it to a vote, it probably wouldn't have gone the way you wanted it to. Tonight it will and I think the ability to work together to get that done is a credit to you, a credit to our staff and others that were involved so appreciate everything you've done to do that. And I do like this layout, this site plan better. Plain and simple and the inclusion of the twin homes to break up, create more open space inbetween. The elimination of some of the larger six unit homes. Spreading out the parking. Dispersing the different types of products around the development. Overall make this a nicer neighborhood for those that live there and others who drive by so, appreciate all your efforts there. With that I guess I would ask if there are other comments or additional comments, that'd be fine. Otherwise is there a motion? We've got a number of motions here I believe, is that right Kate? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilman Lundquist: Mr. Mayor I would move that we approve motions A, B, C and D with the published conditions and findings of fact in the staff report. 19 City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Furlong: Thank you and the one question I'll ask Ms. Aanenson, just to be sure with regard to the conditions. Were they updated with all the comments made at the last meeting so those are... Kate Aanenson: That's correct. They've been modified based on these recent elevations too. Mayor Furlong: Okay, so the revised site plan as well as the recommendations from council at our last meeting? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Are all included. Thank you. Any other discussions or questions? Clarifications? Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approves the Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within this staff report. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approves the Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around each dwelling unit, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall prepare a noise analysis for noise that will be generated by traffic on Highway 312. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which shall be implemented by the developer. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. 3. The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as their portion of the 2005 AUAR. 4. The developer shall revise the plat to incorporate the twin home units as shown on the plan dated May 8, 2006. 9f r City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 5. The developer shall establish a separate outlot(s) for the land within the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone. 6. Dedication of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone shall be made to the city or a conservation easement shall be established over said outlot(s). 7. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be complete within one year of the authorized fill on Liberty on Bluff Creek. 8. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. 9. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. Due to a secondary access through the MnDOT right-of-way (ROW) to the north in the northeast portion of the property, the applicant will be responsible for creating or securing sufficient wetland mitigation for MnDOT that will meet all conditions imposed on MnDOT and will be responsible for any and all fees associated with the redesign of the wetland mitigation areas in MnDOT ROW. Final plat approval shall not be granted until the wetland mitigation plan has been received and approved by the City and MnDOT. 11. The plans shall be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas shall be preserved. In addition, all structures shall maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading shall occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 12. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations shall occur within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. 13. The applicant shall submit a plan for the revegetation of the farmed area south of Bluff Creek that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Special attention shall be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). 14. Alterations appear to be proposed within a mapped FEMA unnumbered A Zone (100 - year floodplain). In lieu of a LOMA, the applicant shall obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain. 21 City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 15. A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) shall be developed for the development and shall be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. 16. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the proposed pond. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail shall be included the plan. 17. The plans shall show paths of access to both wetland mitigation areas as well as all erosion controls and restoration practices. 18. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tyne of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 19. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 20. The applicant shall provide details for curbside inlet control. Wimco-type inlet controls shall be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. 21. Typical building lot controls shall be shown on the plan. These controls may include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. 22. The proposed storm water pond shall be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond shall be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail for the temporary pond outlet shall be included in the plans. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. 23. The ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek shall be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. 22 City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 24. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. 25. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $266,850. 26. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. 27. Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to construction around all areas designated for preservation and/or at the edge of proposed grading limits. 28. Silt fence or tree protection fencing shall be installed at the edge of grading around both wetland mitigation areas. 29. A fenced access road will lead from the east mitigation area to the west mitigation area. This will be the only access allowed to the western site. Fencing shall be placed on either side of the access lane. After construction, the access lane shall be restored according to the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan'. 30. A walk-through inspection of the silt/tree preservation fence shall be required prior to construction. 31. No burning permits shall be issued for tree removal. All trees removed on site shall be chipped and used on site or hauled off. 32. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 33. The applicant shall submit a full sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 34. A turf plan shall be submitted to the city indicating the location of sod and seeding areas. 35. The developer shall pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final plat approval in lieu of parkland dedication. 36. The applicant shall provide all design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the `Bluff Creek Trail" All construction documents shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of 23 City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 construction. The trail shall be ten feet in width, surfaced with bituminous material and constructed to meet all City specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed for the actual cost of construction materials for the Bluff Creek Trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials utilized in its construction. 37. The developer shall provide a sidewalk connection to the Bluff Creek trail through private street B. 38. The developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Pioneer Pass (Peterson Property) and Degler property developments to the west and northwest. 39. The height and length of retaining walls must be reduced to the maximum extent possible. 40. The top and bottom of wall elevations must be shown on the final grading plan. 41. A building permit is required for any retaining walls four feet high or taller. These walls must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 42. The style of home and lowest floor elevation must be noted on the grading plan. 43. Typical sections for each housing style must be shown on the final grading plan. 44. The final grading plan must be 50 scale so that staff can complete a full review of the proposed grading. 45. The developer must verify the invert elevation of the sanitary sewer connection that will be constructed with the 2005 MUSA Improvement Project. 46. The development may not proceed until the Phase H 2005 MUSA utility extension project has been awarded. 47. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges and the SAC charge at the time of building permit. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00/unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00/unit for watermain. The SAC charge is $1,625.00/unit. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 48. The northern access (currently shown to the Fox property) must be shifted to the east to the MNDOT right-of-way parcel. Prior to final plat approval, the developer must contact 24 e City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 the Fox family to coordinate the elevation of the northern street connection at their property line. 49. The Arterial Collector Fee shall be paid with the final plat. The 2006 fee is $2,400/developable acre. 50. The final plans must show the new orientation for Lots 13 and 14, Block 2. 51. The site plan and final grading plan must identify the proposed 10 -foot wide bituminous trail. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approves Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. 3. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire - resistive construction. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. 7. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 8. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. OR City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 9. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 10. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 11. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required on the private streets. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of sign. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991. 12. Staff will work with the developer on materials, colors and diversity. 13. The developer shall incorporate the twin home units as proposed in the sketch plan dated May 8, 2006." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approves Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 2. The applicant shall submit a full-sized 'Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 3. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. 4. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Pki City Council Meeting — May 22, 2006 Kevin Clark: I just want to thank you mayor and council, and it really has truly been a joint effort throughout this whole process. Both at Bluff Creek and here at Creekside and I guess mostly we thank you for your patience with us. It seems like we've been... going to school on this and I think we've benefited and we appreciate your input, your time spent with us and you know your investment so we're looking forward to moving forward. Mayor Furlong: Thank you and we look forward to your successful developments for our city. Very good, thank you. PLANNING CASE 06-13: REOUEST FOR REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT (A2) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -RESIDENTIAL (PUD - R), PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL CREATING 13 LOTS AND ONE OUTLOT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT. Kate Aanenson: Thank you. This item appeared before the Planning Commission on May 2°d. They recommended, they took their motions separately. Voted 3 to 3 to, the motion was to approve the rezoning. It was 3 to 3 so basically in effect that died. They also voted a negative 1 to 5 for the approval of the preliminary plat with the variances, and then also 1 to 5 against the conditional use, so therefore they recommended denial and the findings of fact in your packet reflect that motion for denial. What I'd like to do is take some time and go in your staff report is the background, is take a few minutes and walk through the background of how this project came about. And as you stated mayor, the subject site is located on West 780'. If you go in the background and on page 3 of the staff report it talks about how this property got severed and that was the creation of West 780' Street, severed the property into two parcels, and at that time sewer and water was provided. Shortly thereafter in 2003, can you zoom out just a bit? Thank you. The owner of the property, Mr. Pryzmus appeared before the, a conditional, or concept, excuse me, concept approval for a plan and that was in 2003. That included the recreational fun center and some town houses. Multi family on the north side and that included approximately 18. There was a letter that was put out by the city at that time talking about kind of the concept had not standing, so that sat for a while and then in December of 2005 a concept was brought forward to the City Council. Maybe you can zoom in a little bit on that. So we're looking at again the entire PUD which included at that time office industrial or commercial, and then residential on the north side. The council at that time gave conceptual approval but then based on specific recommendations specifically regarding that retail study we completed, which to date we haven't gotten the final draft yet on that either so we haven't given any standing on the retail study and at a minimum, only twin homes be considered to be consistent on that north side. So that was the marching orders that was given again when that appeared on the December 12th, 2005 conceptual approval. So with that to date the applicant has come forward with a twin home plan. Just I'll make another point. On this plan here there was shown 10. Then when it came in it went to 12, and they came in requesting a PUD. The purpose of the PUD allows for the flexibility in the ordinance. It also is a tool that we used before this property is in the overlay district. If you look at the original plan that I showed you that had the 16 units on, all those units 27 Chanhassen City Council -April 12, 2010 i. Approve Request for Preliminary Plat Extension, Liberty at Creekside, NDI Minnesota, LLC j. Approval of Temporary On -Sale Liquor License, Chanhassen Fourth of July Celebration, Chanhassen Rotary Club. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: CHANHASSEN RED BIRDS BASEBALL TEAM, BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Mayor Furlong: Tonight we have representatives from the Board of Directors of the Chanhassen Red Birds baseball team so I'd like to invite them up at this time and. Bird doesn't say much. Councilman Litsey: I don't want to make him mad through. Elise Ryan: Well good evening Mayor, council members. Mayor Furlong: Good evening. Elise Ryan: Do I need to state my name and address? Okay. Elise Ryan and address is 6587 Shadow Lane in Chanhassen and we're here to talk about the Red Birds, if you didn't notice. Thank you for allowing us to be here tonight. I understand that you got to have a little baseball fare before in your prior meeting so hope you enjoyed that and I think now Todd Hoffman's going to come up and sing "fake Me Out to the Ballpark". Todd Gerhardt: I've never seen Todd get nervous. Elise Ryan: Of course everybody has the Twins on their minds today with opening day and Go Twins. Pulling out a victory but in Chanhassen we have our own ballpark that we're very excited to be talking about today and want to go into that a little bit here today. So first of all the baseball stadium we believe is just an awesome facility for town ball and we would like to take this opportunity to thank the board and the Mayor for approving the building of this facility and your investment, agreeing to invest the $600,000 of the park dedication fund to allow building this phenomenal facility. It's going to be as the Mayor said in an earlier press conference, it's going to be a great thing for the City of Chanhassen. Great for families from this community and all around so we really thank you for that. It once again shows our community what a commitment you all have to make this a great place to live, a great place to work, and a great place to play baseball and have a lot of fun so on behalf of the Red Birds we would like to thank you for that. Second of all we would like to invite the board to come to our opening game which is on May 23 d. It's a Sunday at 2:00 p.m. and there's going to be a lot of exciting festivities on that day and we would like if you are able, for all of you to come and join us on the field so we can thank you publicly for all your hard work on behalf of the City but also for help funding the building of a great facility and Mayor we would like you to throw out the fust pitch. Mayor Furlong: I would be honored. Councilman Litsey: There's some pressure. Elise Ryan: So start practicing. And last of all as a token of our appreciation we brought some goodies so you guys are appropriately outfitted for opening day. We brought you hats and t -shirts and our Red CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 12, 2010 Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Litsey, Councilwoman Ernst, Councilwoman Tjomhom, and Councilman McDonald STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Roger Knutson, Laurie Hokkanen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, and Todd Hoffman PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Furlong: Good evening and welcome to everyone here in the council chambers and those watching us at home. We're glad that you joined us this evening. At this time I would ask if there are any changes or modifications to the agenda from members of the council. Knot, we'll proceed with the agenda as published if there are no objections. And I don't have a printed copy so I've got to get back to. Thank you. First item on our agenda this evening will be the consent agenda items. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated March 22, 2010 -City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated March 22, 2010 Receive Commission Minutes: -Planning Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated March 16, 2010 -Park and Recreation Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated March 23, 2010 b. Resolution #2010-26: Approve Resolution Accepting Donations from Xcel Energy and Roberts Automatic Products for 2010 Special Events Sponsorship Program. C. Resolution #2010-27: Harrison Hill Drainage Improvements: Approve Quote. d. Resolution #2010-28: 2010 Street Improvements (Erie Avenue), Project 10-01(a): Call Assessment Hearing. e. Resolution #2010-29: Approve Change Order No. 1 for Sewer Pipe Installation at Lake Ann Park. f. Resolution #2010-30: Medical Arts Parking Lot Rehabilitation Project 10-05: Authorize Preparation of Feasibility Study. g. Approval of Arbor Day Post Contest Winners. h. Approve Amendment to the Following Planned Unit Developments: Vasserman Ridge/Arboretum Village/Galpin Business Park. Applicant: City of Chanhassen. C-1n:AJ3 CITY OF CIIANNSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Aillnnnistraton Plane: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: April 12, 2010 Q U' SUBJ: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case #05-24 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 22, 2010 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Finance The developer, NDI Minnesota, LLC, is requesting another one-year extension of Phone: 952.227.1140 the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside to May 22, 2011. This project was Fax: 952.227.1110 originally taken through the development review process by Town & Country Park g Recreation Homes. The extension is necessary due to the current depressed market conditions Phone: 952.227.1120 for residential development and construction and the lack of development on Fax: 952.227.1110 adjacent properties through which access to this property must be made. Recreation Can* Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final 2310 Coulter boulevard Plane: 952.227.1400 Plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in Fax: 952.227.1404 Writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat. Staff can attest to the slowdown in the residential housing market. Manning 8 Additionally, the right-of-way from Bluff Creek Boulevard to the adjacent property Natural Resources has not been dedicated and the recording of the final plat for the Pioneer Pass Phone: 952.227.1130 development, immediately west of the site, has not been completed, which included Fax: 952.227.1110 the right-of-way providing access to this property. Public Works 1591 Park Road The City and developer worked diligently to create a well-designed project with Phone:952.227.1300 diverse housing styles. There have been no amendments to the City Code that Fax:952.227.1310 would adversely affect the conditions of approval for the Liberty at Creekside development. All the conditions of approval shall remain in force for the Senior Center development. All fees were specified as those in effect at the time of final plat Rune: 952.227.1125 approval. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for a one-year Fax: 952.227.1110 extension to May 22, 2011. Web Site www.ci.chanhas.w.mmus {CANNED Chanhassen is a Community to We - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt Liberty at Creekside April 12, 2010 Page 2 of 3 BACKGROUND The Chanhassen City Council approved one-year extensions to the preliminary plat on June 8, 2009, April 28, 2008, and May 29, 2007. On May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report. B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around each dwelling unit. C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, hie., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, and revised April 6, 2006. D. Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Todd Gerhardt Liberty at Creekside April 12, 2010 Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 22, 2011for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24." ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map. 2. Letter from Peter J. Brennan to Robert Generous Dated March 25, 2010. 3. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat. 4. Reduced Copy Preliminary Sketch Plan. 5. 2005 Open Space, Trail and Development Areas Map. gAplan\2005 planning casest05-24 liberty at creeksidetextension memo preliminary plat 2010.doc Location Map Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen NDI MINNESOTA, LLC March 25, 2010 By Fax and U.S. Mail (952)227-1110 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen Planning Case No. 05-24 Request for Extension Dear Mr. Generous: On behalf of NDI Minnesota LLC, I am writing to request a one (1) year extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Liberty at Creek Side development, which I understand would extend the current approval to May 22, 2011. This extension is necessary in light of current depressed market condition impacting residential development and construction and lack of development on adjoining and nearby parcels. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information to support the requested extension. Very truly Peter J. Brennan General Counsel MAR 2 9 2010 Cc: Jocelyn L. Knoll CITY OF CHANHASSEN 12 Salt Creek Lane • Suite 200 • Hinsdale, Illinois 60521-8611 • (630) 887-1705 • Fax (630) 887-1749 5d � � III p6ro .] 4s JITRW Rva M _ x I � 5d � � III p6ro .] i JITRW Rva M _ Lill Ft 5"iI;i�� _�rfiOTI i i 5� 3H �\ �ii+88, ecce eee eree :g� aa� iIR s & , J" a qJ ! 4P�8 rt;d$8 Y IVE-F�a i �\ n Y 11 � g di yi 41 .a W MM AINi .`✓sYO�.�YNNv 2005 OPEN SPACE, TRAIL & DEVELOPMENT AREAS PROPOSED T"L PROPOSED PUB C OPEN SPACE PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK PROPOSED PRNATE PARK CO N SPACE .....�.w..y.�r .. Ma r. 25. 2010 3:45 PM To: Robert Generous FOXFORD Company: City of Chanhassen Fax Number: 952.227.1110 Phone Number: From: Peter Brennan 12 Salt Creek Lane, Suite 200, Hinsdale, IL 60521 Phone 630-887-1705 ♦ Fax 630-887-1749 FOXFORD LLC No. 2413 P. 1 Numuer of Pages Including Cover Sheet 2 Subject: extension quest REMARKS. n FYI ❑ For your review Reply ASAP Please Comment The information contained in this transmission is privileged and/or confidential and intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. Tf the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, and return the original transmission to us at the above address VIA the U.S. Postal Servico. Thank you. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.11 BO Fax: 952.227.1190 IlinillineediRl Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 IR MO Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Kane: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Canter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 June 15, 2009 Mr. Peter J. Brennan General Counsel NDI Minnesota, LLC 12 Salt Creek Lane, Suite 200 Hinsdale, IL 60521-8611 Re: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case #05-24 Dear Mr. Brennan: This letter is to inform you that on June 8, 2009, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2010 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City thirty (30) days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bizenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure Web Site wwad.chanhasserinn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life- Providing for Today and Planning torTomonow OG -2-q SCANNED ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Nam Works Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer 1591 ParkRoad Phone:952.227.1300 7.1 Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Fax: 952.227.1310 Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official Sefdor Center gAplanx2005 planning casesx05-24 liberty at creeksid6cmension letter prelim plat 2009 -dm Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site wwad.chanhasserinn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life- Providing for Today and Planning torTomonow OG -2-q SCANNED Chanhassen City Council - June 8, 2009 1) Resolution #2009-47: Pedestrian Trail Underpass at TH 5 and Minnewashta Parkway. 2) Resolution #2009-48: Reconstruction of MN 101 from Lyman Boulevard to Pioneer Trail. 3) Resolution #2009-49: Reconstruction and Widening of Lyman Boulevard from Audubon (North Leg to Powers Boulevard. d. Approve Preliminary Plat Extension for Liberty at Creekside. e. Apple Tree Estates, 8600 Waters Edge Drive. Applicant: Plowe Engineering, Inc., Owner: Aloysius Klingelhutz. 1) Final Plat Approval. 2) Approve Development Contract. f. Approve Contract for School Resource Officer, Chanhassen High School as amended. g. Resolution #2009-50: Lift Station #24, Wet Well Rehabilitation: Approve Quote. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, with that one motion it will reflect, we handed out the one change in there and that's. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Under item, which one was this? Todd Gerhardt: F. Mayor Furlong: Item 1(f) there was a technical correction to the agreement dealing with the employment status of the school resource officer. I think that was distributed but that was just a technical clarification from what was distributed during. Okay. With that, as part of our items this evening on our consent agenda that we just passed, one was to accept a donation from K1einBank for our Summer Concert Series. We have a representative from KleinBank here this evening. If you'd like to come forward and just introduce yourself at the podium. Say a few words. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTATION OF $2.000 CHECK FOR SUMMER CONCERT SERIES, KLEINBANK CHANHASSEN. Greg Lovell: Sure. Be happy to. My name is Greg Lovell. I'm President of K1einBank Chanhassen. I'm delighted to be here this evening. We're very happy and pleased to be able to offer our support again for this year's summer concert series. We hope that everyone here and your families and other residents of the community enjoy the series again this year. We're very proud to be a part of it so Mr. Mayor, thank you. City Council members, thank you very much. Mayor Furlong: Now can we bring this to the drive thru? 2 I CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 8, 2009 Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Litsey, Councilwoman Ernst, Councilwoman Tjornhom, and Councilman McDonald STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Roger Knutson, Laurie Hokkanen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman, and Terry Jeffery PUBLIC PRESENT: Gary Bhojwani 3301 Shore Drive Al & Mary Klingelhutz 8600 Waters Edge Peter Johnson PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Furlong: Thank you everybody and welcome. Appreciate everybody joining us here this evening as well as those watching at home. It's nice to be back. It was good to see my chair open when I walked into the council chambers this evening but. Councilwoman Tjomhom: It's all your's. Mayor Furlong: But my thank you and appreciation to Deputy Mayor Tjornhom for covering the meeting for me 2 weeks ago. With that I will ask if there are any modifications to the agenda. Any proposed additions or amendments to the agenda? If not, without objection we'll proceed with the agenda as distributed. At this point I'd like to move forward. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilman Litsey seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated May 26, 2009 -City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated May 26, 2009 Receive Commission Minutes: -Planning Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated May 19, 2009 b. Resolution #2009-46: Accept Donation from KleinBank for Summer Concert Series. c. Approve Support Letters and Resolution for Federal Funding Applications: CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO BOX 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952 227 1100 Fax: 952,227 1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952 227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park 8 RaxeaBdr Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: June 8, 2009 a� SUBJ: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case #05-24 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 22, 2010 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The developer, NDI Minnesota, LLC, is requesting another one-year extension of the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside to May 22, 2010. This project was originally taken through the development review process by Town & Country Homes. The extension is necessary due to the current depressed market conditions for residential development and construction and the lack of development on adjacent properties through which access to this property must be made. Recreation Cel 2310 Coulterer Ooulevard Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final Phone: 952 2271400 plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in Fax: 952 227.1404 writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat. Staff can attest to the slowdown in the residential housing market. Planning 8 Additionally, the right-of-way from Bluff Creek Boulevard to the adjacent property Natural Resources has not been dedicated and the recording of the final plat for the Pioneer Pass Phone: 952.227.1130 development, immediately west of the site, has not been completed, which included Fax: 952.227.1110 the right-of-way providing access to this property. Public Warks 1591 Park Road The City and developer worked diligently to create a well-designed project with Phone: 952.227.1300 diverse housing styles. There have been no amendments to the City Code that Fax: 952.227.1310 would adversely affect the conditions of approval for the Liberty at Creekside development. All the conditions of approval shall remain in force for the Senor Center development. All fees were specified as those in effect at the time of final plat PFax:952.227.1110 approval. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for a one-year Fax: 952.227.1110 extension to May 22, 2010. Web Site www.ci.rdwhasser.mn.us JA Chanhassen is a ConnwAy for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 03NNVOS Todd Gerhardt Liberty at Creekside June 8, 2009 Page 2 of 3 BACKGROUND On April 28, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved a second one-year extension to the preliminary plat. On May 29, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension to the preliminary plat. On May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report. B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around each dwelling unit. C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, and revised April 6, 2006. D. Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Todd Gerhardt Liberty at Creekside June 8, 2009 Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 22, 2010 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24." ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map. 2. Letter from Peter J. Brennan to Bob Generous Dated May 26, 2009. 3. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat. 4. Reduced Copy Preliminary Sketch Plan 5. 2005 Open Space, Trail and Development Areas Map. g1p1ant2005 planning cases\05-24 liberty at creekside\extension memo preliminary plat 2009.doc Location Map Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen May, 27. 2009 10:40AM FOXFORD No. 1522 P. 2 NDI MINNESOTA, LLC May 26, 2009 By Pax and U.S. Mail (952)227-1110 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen Planning Case No, 05-24 Request for Extension Dear Mr. Generous: On behalf of NDI Minnesota LLC, I am writing to request a one (1) year extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Liberty at Creek Side development, which I understand would extend the current approval to May 22, 2010. This extension is necessary in light of current depressed market condition impacting residential development and construction and lack of development on adjoining and nearby parcels. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information to support the requested extension. Very truly yours, NDI MINNESOTA, LLC Peter 1. Brennan General Counsel Cc: Jocelyn L. Knoll 12 Salt Creek Lane • Suite 200 • Hinsdale, Illinois 60521-8611 9 (630) 887-1705 • Fax (630) 887-1749 � 1 0 NJ I pp lh {�9 — v y 6 NJ I pp lh {�9 m b v NJ I pp lh {�9 �r J _ 71 NJ I pp lh {�9 1 gt R: iF�+R+ F'n RR RSRR4c^ tq��aX is±{y3 � R 9 Y yt Id�g, •pp � � [h! { ;£Ya �[�#fys � III � instal##�gfi��ii?iii i r r . I I - 2005 OPEN SPACE, TRAIL & DEVELOPMENT AREAS �IMOlOI,OTMII ® m—" IY:m 011l IMC, MO'OI,O IV IIIc MOI ® PO)Idl0 /OMT, M,M "X IMC, ,..o.�..dr.�...... CffY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phow 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952 227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 RecreaBon Center 2310 Couber Boulevard Plane: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning 8 Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Ceft Phorle:952.227.1125 Fax 952.227.1110 Web Site www.d.chanhassen.mn.us GS - ;)V March 20, 2009 Mr. Peter J. Brennan General Counsel NDI Minnesota, LLC 12 Salt Creek Lane, Suite 200 Hinsdale, IL 60521-8611 Re: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case #05-24 Dear Mr. Brennan: On April 28, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2009, for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24. Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City thirty (30) days prior to the City Cquncil meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Should you neither request a final plat approval or request an extension of the preliminary plat, the preliminary plat shall become null and void. Any future development of the site would require a new development review. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous @ci.chanhassen.mn.us. S \a ^ Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure ec: . Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager gAplanx2005 planning casesx05-24 liberty at creeksid6notice of preliminary plat exp.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life. Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: 1. Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (81/2" x 11 "), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29-06 gAengVorms\final plat submittal-doc NDI MINNESOTA, LLC May 26, 2009 By Fax and U.S. Mail (952)227-1110 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen Planning Case No. 05-24 Request for Extension Dear Mr. Generous: RECEIVED JUN 1 2009 CITY OF CHANHASSEN On behalf of NDI Minnesota LLC, I am writing to request a one (1) year extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Liberty at Creek Side development, which I understand would extend the current approval to May 22, 2010. This extension is necessary in light of current depressed market condition impacting residential development and construction and lack of development on adjoining and nearby parcels. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information to support the requested extension. Very truly yours, NDI MINNESOTA, LLC Peter J. Brennan General Counsel Cc: Jocelyn L. Knoll 12 Salt Creek Lane • Suite 200 • Hinsdale, Illinois 60521-8611 • (630) 887-1705 • Fax (630) 887-1749 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, A 55317 Administration RM: 952 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phare: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 69n9 Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park 8 Recreaft Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Pudic Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web site www.ci.diarrhassen.mn.us May 22, 2009 Mr. Peter J. Brennan General Counsel NDI Minnesota, LLC 12 Salt Creek Lane, Suite 200 Hinsdale, IL 60521-8611 Re: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case #05-24 Dear Mr. Brennan: On May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On May 29, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension for the preliminary plat approval for the Liberty at Creekside development. This extension was until May 22, 2008. On April 28, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2009, for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24. Section 1841 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat. In March of this year, we sent you a notice of the pending expiration of the preliminary plat. Since you neither requested final plat approval nor an extension of the preliminary plat, the preliminary plat is now null and void. Any future development of the site will require a new development review. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Roger Knutson, City Attorney Jerry Mohn, Building Official g:xplanx2005 planning casesx05-24 liberty at creeksidefnotice of voiding preliminary plat .doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Manning for Tornaraw CITY of CHANHA33EN 7700 Market Boulevard PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227 1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.221.1160 Fax: 952 2271170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952 227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227,1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227 1110 Web Site www.o chanhassen.mn.us cs -a4 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: April 28, 2008 SUBJ: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case #05-24 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The developer, NDI Minnesota, LLC, is requesting another one-year extension of the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside to May 22, 2009. This project was originally taken through the development review process by Town & Country Homes. However, NDI Minnesota, LLC has been the underlying property owner. NDI Minnesota, LLC wishes to preserve the development approvals on the site. The extension is necessary due to the current depressed market conditions for residential development and construction, the lack of development on adjacent properties through which access to this property must be made, and a contractual dispute between the property owner and Mr. Jeurissen, the former property owner. Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat. Staff can attest to the slowdown in the residential housing market. Additionally, the right-of-way from Bluff Creek Boulevard to the adjacent property has not been dedicated and the recording of the final plat for the Pioneer Pass development, immediately west of the site, has not been completed, which included the right-of-way providing access to this property. The City and developer worked diligently to create a well-designed project with diverse housing styles. There have been no amendments to the City Code that would adversely affect the conditions of approval for the Liberty at Creekside development. All the conditions of approval shall remain in force for the development. All fees were specified as those in effect at the time of final plat approval. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for a one-year extension to May 22, 2009. BACKGROUND On May 29, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one year extension to the preliminary plat. -19 The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Todd Gerhardt Liberty at Creekside April 28, 2008 Page 2 of 3 On May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report. B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around each dwelling unit. C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, and revised April 6, 2006. D. Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. ACTION REQUIRED City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 21, 2006, to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to approve the proposed project. Todd Gerhardt Liberty at Creekside April 28, 2008 Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 22, 2009 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24." ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map. 2. Letter from Peter J. Brennan to Bob Generous Dated March 18, 2008. 3. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat. 4. Reduced Copy Preliminary Sketch Plan 5. 2005 Open Space, Trail and Development Areas Map. 6. Letter from Robert Generous to Shawn Siders dated May 24, 2006. 9:\pla11\2005 planning cases\05-24 Ebert at cmckside\cxtension memo preliminary plat 2008.doc Location Map Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen yman Blvd (CSAH 18) LOI -o Subject Site o �a 5 8 °° opo �oQo Q � oa a ' CSA I Uff C I 0 01 .. G Q P ��• C l !I i 0 2005 OPEN SPACE, TRAIL &DEVELOPMENT AREAS ^E MID WFf D iMll Q MIDMMED pu:M OHF EMCF V,,o"Eo FYUC MRK MIDMMFO FMYATE PARMVFF IMCF a r, r,- ;q City Council Meeting - September 8, 2008 Councilwoman Tjomhom: What has your response been so far? Allison Ishizaki: Well as I said we just launched on August ls` so we're really still just getting things going but so far we've had very positive feedback and we've had people emailing the web site saying you know, giving us events and things that they want listed and saying that it has been beneficial. As we continue on we hope to you know partner with bike shops and some fitness places and different things just to do some more promotion of the web site. Mayor Furlong: Very good. It looks very comprehensive and appreciate your initiative and help. I know that our staff has been coordinating and providing information. Looks like a lot of pictures, which is good. Allison Ishizaki: Yeah. Chanhassen has done a lot of great things. A lot of pictures and stuff out from the city. Todd Hoffman: Give thanks to Jolene Devens, our GIS coordinator here at the city and then Mitch Johnson, our summer intern did most of the work... Mayor Furlong: Okay. Please extend our appreciation to them as well. Very good. Any questions? Any other questions? Okay. Alright. Thank you very much. Anyone else for visitor presentations this evening? Okay. We'll move on to our items of business then. PUBLIC HEARING: LIBERTY ON BLUFF CREEK: VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT. Paul Oehme: Thank you Mayor, City Council members. The applicant, which is a developer, K. Hovnanian has requested a portion of the drainage utility easement located on Lot 27, Block I of Liberty on Bluff Creek be vacated. The easement in question is shown on this drawing here. If you can zoom in. The easement is located in, Liberty on Bluff Creek is just east of Audubon and south of new Bluff Creek Boulevard. The road that was constructed about a year and a half ago. The drainage utility easement was granted to the city in 2006 with the Liberty on Bluff Creek final plat. Four lots within the I" Addition are being replatted with the P Addition which was recently\approved by council. The lot configuration changed and therefore a portion of the drainage utilities has been dedicated with the Is` Addition must be vacated. Now I'm showing what the vacation area looks like. It's a rectangular easement. That's about a third of an acre that the applicant is requesting to be vacated. There are no public or private utilities located in the easement at this time. Staff concurs with the applicant and recommends that the easement be vacated at this time, so if there's any questions I'd be happy to try to answer them for you. Otherwise I'd request that a public hearing be open at this time. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions for staff? No need in the future for anything in this area that we can anticipate? Paul Oehme: Not that we are planning for or can think of. SCANNED City Council Meeting - September 8, 2008 Mayor Furlong: Okay. Very good. Thank you. Any other questions of staff? If not I'll go ahead and open up the public hearing and invite all interested parties to come forward to the podium. Please state your name and address before addressing the council. Seeing no one I'll go ahead and close the public hearing without objection and bring it back to council for discussion. Any issues or thoughts or comments on this? Fairly straight forward. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Yeah, I think it's fairly straight forward. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilman McDonald: No comments. Everything seems fine to me. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Very good. Is there a motion to adopt staff's recommendation? Councilman Litsey: Make a motion that the City Council approve the easement vacation for Lot 27, Block 1, Liberty on Bluff Creek subject to the filing Liberty on Bluff Creek 3 d Addition plat and development contract. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Second. Mayor Furlong: Motion's been made and seconded. Any discussion? Resolution #2008- 46: Councilman Litsey moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approve the easement vacation for Lot 27, Block 1, Liberty on Bluff Creek subject to the filing Liberty on Bluff Creek 3`" Addition plat and development contract. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. NEW PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING. PARK PLACE: A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PRELIMINARY I II BONDS (NOT A PUBLIC HEARING). C. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL CONTRACT (NOT A PUBLIC HEARING). D. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF INTERIM USE PERMIT FOR GRADING (NOT A PUBLIC HEARING). Greg Sticha: Good evening Mayor and City Council members. We'll start with item 4(a) but before we get to that I just kind of want to give a little time line on the process that we have in regards to the public works building. City Council has directed staff to look into funding for a 0 65-,�)4 City Council Meeting - April 28, 2008 Mayor Furlong: Okay. If there's any questions on that we can pull it off. Otherwise if we're comfortable, then we'll go ahead and approve staff's modified recommendations with the other consent items. Is there any objection to doing that? Okay. We'll keep that on and approval would be to adopt staff's modified recommendation. Any other items on the consent agenda that any members of the council, or if there's other members in the audience present that would like to remove for separate discussion. Okay. Seeing nobody, is there a motion to adopt items 1(a) through (k) as amended. Councilman Litsey moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated April 14, 2008 -City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated April 14, 2008 Receive Commission Minutes: -Park and Recreation Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated March 25, 2008 b. Accept $2,000 Donation from General Mills for Safety Camp. d. Approval of Fireworks Permit, July 4, Minnewashta Fireworks Committee. e. Resolution #2008-27: Lift Station No. 12, PW055L: Approve Quote for Panel Replacement. Resolution #2008-28: Lake Susan Shoreline Restoration Project (Robinson), SWMP 14F4: Approve Quote as amended by staff. g. Approve Request for Preliminary Plat Extension, Liberty at Creekside, NDI Minnesota, LLC. h. Resolution #2008-29: Adopt Resolution Approving 2007 Fund Transfers. i. Approve Change Order No. 1, Well No. 3 Redevelopment. j. Approve Change Order No. 1, Lake Ann Park Picnic Shelter. k. Resolution #2008-30: Proclamation Declaring Saturday, May 3, 2008 as Arbor Day in the City of Chanhassen. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. 4 SCANNED os- ay Engineering This letter is to inform you that on April 28, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1170 approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2009 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24. Finance P:211 Fax: 952.227.1110 Final plat documents must be submitted to the City thirty (30) days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Park d Recreation Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Phone: 952.227,1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 2310 Coulter Boulevard orbgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.221.1404 Sincere Planning Nalurol Resources Phone: 952 227,1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Robert Generous, AICP Public works Senior Planner 1591 Park Road Phone: 952-227.1300 Enclosure Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Phone: 952 2271125 Fax:952.227,1110 Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Web Site Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator www.ci.chanhassermn.us Jerry Mohn, Building Official giplan\2005 planning casesx05-24 liberty at creeksidekextension letter prelim plat 2008.doc SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. April 29, 2008 CITY OF CHANSEN Mr. Peter J. Brennan General Counsel 7700 Markel Boulevard NDI Minnesota> LLC PO Boa 141 - Chanhassen, MN 55317 12 Salt Creek Lane, Suite 200 Hinsdale, ]IL 60521-8611 Administration Phone: 952 227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Re: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case #05-24 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Dear Mr. Brennan: Engineering This letter is to inform you that on April 28, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1170 approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2009 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24. Finance P:211 Fax: 952.227.1110 Final plat documents must be submitted to the City thirty (30) days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Park d Recreation Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Phone: 952.227,1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 2310 Coulter Boulevard orbgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.221.1404 Sincere Planning Nalurol Resources Phone: 952 227,1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Robert Generous, AICP Public works Senior Planner 1591 Park Road Phone: 952-227.1300 Enclosure Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Phone: 952 2271125 Fax:952.227,1110 Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Web Site Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator www.ci.chanhassermn.us Jerry Mohn, Building Official giplan\2005 planning casesx05-24 liberty at creeksidekextension letter prelim plat 2008.doc SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8t/2" x 11 "), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29-06 gAengVo"s\final plat sutxnittal.doc NDI MINNESOTA, LLC RECEIVED March 18, 2008 By Fax and U.S. Mail (952) 227-1110 Bob Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen Planning Case No. 05-24 Request for Extension Dear Mr. Generous: 0 2008 CITY OF CHANHASSEN On behalf of NDI Minnesota, LLC, I am writing to request a one (1) year extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Liberty at Creek Side development, which I understand would extend the current approval to May 22, 2009. This extension is necessary in light of current depressed market condition impacting residential development and construction, lack of development on adjoining and nearby parcels, and a contractual dispute between NDI MN, LLC and Mr. Jeurissen. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information to support the requested extension. Very truly yours, NDI MINNESOTA, Peter J. Brennan General Counsel cc: Jocelyn L. Knoll 12 Salt Creek Lane 9 Suite 200 • Hinsdale, Illinois 60521-8611 • (630) 887-1705 • Fax (630) 887-1749 Parr 3 Recreation 65-Z� Phone: 952.227.1120 2� Fax: 952.227.1110 MEMORANDUM Recreation Center TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager � CITYOF FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner CRUSEN Additionally, the recording of the final plat for the Pioneer Pass development Fax: 952.227.1404 DATE: May 29, 2007 7700 Market Boulevard way providing access to this property. PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJ: Liberty at Creekside Natural Resources Planning Case #05-24 Administration There have been no amendments to the City Code that would adversely affect the PFax:952.227.11100 Fax: 952.227.1110 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Building Inspections The developer, NDI Minnesota, LLC, is requesting a one-year extension of the Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1190 preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside to May 22, 2008. While this project was Phone: 952.227.1300 taken through the development review process by Town & Country Homes, NDI Engineering Minnesota, LLC, has been the underlying property owner. NDI Minnesota, LLC, Phone: 952.227.1160 wishes to preserve the development approvals on the site. The extension is Fax: 952.221.1170 necessary due to the current depressed market conditions on residential development Finance and construction, the lack of development on adjacent properties and a contractual Phone: 952.227.1140 dispute between the property owner and Mr. Jeurissen, the former property owner. Fax: 952.227.1110 with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Parr 3 Recreation Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final Phone: 952.227.1120 plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in Fax: 952.227.1110 writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause an extension of the Recreation Center preliminary plat. Staff can attest to the slowdown in the residential housing market. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Additionally, the recording of the final plat for the Pioneer Pass development Fax: 952.227.1404 immediately west of the site has not been completed, which included the right -of - way providing access to this property. Planning 8 Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 There have been no amendments to the City Code that would adversely affect the Fax: 952.227.1110 conditions of approval for the Liberty at Creekside development. All fees were Public Works specified as those in effect at the time of final plat approval. Staff is recommending 1591 Park Road approval of the applicant's request for a one-year extension to May 22, 2008. Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 BACKGROUND Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 On May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Fax: 952.227.1110 Web site A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development www.achanhassen.mn.us with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report. B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around each dwelling unit. temao The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. Todd Gerhardt Liberty at Creekside May 29, 2007 Page 2 of 2 C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006. D. Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff reek Overlay District. ACTION REQUIRED City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 21, 2006, to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to approve the proposed project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 22, 2008 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24." ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map. 2. Letter from John D. Ostergren to Bob Generous dated May 18, 2007. 3. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat. 4. Preliminary Sketch Plan. 5. 2005 Open Space, Trail and Development Areas Map. 6. Letter from Robert Generous to Shawn Siders dated may 24, 2006. giplant2005 planning casest05-24 liberty at c kside\extmsion memo preliminary plat-dw Location Map Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen 05/18/2007 10:13 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 0 002/002 HORSEY DORSEY & WHI7NcY LLQ JOHN D. OSTERGREN (612) 492-6983 FAX (612) 340-2868 ostergren.john@dorsey.com May 18, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL Bob Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 fax (952) 227-1110 Re: Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen Planning Case No. 05-24 Request for Extension Dear Mr. Generous: On behalf of NDI Minnesota, LLC, I am writing to request a one (1) year extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Liberty at Creek Side development, which I understand would extend the current approval to May 22, 2008. This extension is necessary in light of current depressed market conditions impacting residential development and construction, lack of development on adjoining and nearby parcels, and a contractual dispute between our client and Mr. Jeurissen. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information to support the requested extension. ?15 / /lr John D. 0 egr n I/ cc: Peter J. Brennan Jocelyn L. Knoll DORSEY S WHITNEY LLP • WWW-DORSEY.COM • T 612.340.2600 • F 612.340.2868 SUITE 1500 • 50 SOUTH SIXTH STREET • MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402-1496 USIA CANA04 EUROPE ^S1. . �V iauu 1y u Ira- gn . r-7ci �- 1Q4 �11L�� , $ ^ q.9 E 0 V� . �V iauu 1y u Ira- gn . r-7ci �- 1Q4 �11L�� , I s — a 9 6 �aa x 3t �Lt' k i g g 8 d a.s.jls % 2ii � 1l3!�2 'a A:F3aRw" S:RR RSRAY^R 4lig d A i!l�rb A a 55555 >,� �yg g ES i g a1 11 4 tg kill, ldt�ia�[13i9$!RIEYd III ------ ------- \ // / Vii! If __ cq if V IO vTM fYNL !'✓WIY�CwYY¢�V Administration May 24, 2006 Phone: 952-227.110D Mr. Shawn Siders CITY Of Town & Country Homes Phone: 952.227.1300 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 CHOUSSEN Eden Prairie, MN 55344 T700Market Boulevard Re: Liberty at Creekside Pe Chanhassen, MN MN 55317 Planning Case 05-24 g Administration Dear Mr. Siders: Phone: 952-227.110D 1591 Park Road Fax: 95M7.11 10 architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. Phone: 952.227.1300 This letter is to confirm that on May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council Building Inspections approved the following: Phone: 952.227.1180 The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as their portion of the 2005 AUAR. Fax 952227.1190 A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development Engineering with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Phone: 952.227.1160 Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Fax: 952.227.1170 Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating, the development design Finance standards contained within this staff report. Plrone:952227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Park A Recreation Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, Phone: 952227.1120 revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around Fac 952.227.1110 each dwelling unit, subject to the following conditions: Recreation Center 2310 Cook Boulevard Phone: 952.2271400 1. The applicant shall prepare a noise analysis for noise that will be Fax 952.227.1404 generated by traffic on Highway 312. The analysis shall identify Planning b appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for Natural Resources residential homes as specified b the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, P Y o Y, Phu: 952.227.1130 which shall be implemented by the developer. Fax:952.227.1110 - Public works 2• The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and 1591 Park Road architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 3. The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as their portion of the 2005 AUAR. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 "4. The developer shall revise the plat to incorporate the twin home units as Fax: 952.227.1110 shown on the plan dated May 8, 2006. Web Site www.ra.chanhassen.mn.us 5. The developer shall establish a separate outlot(s) for the land within the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone. 6. Dedication of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone shall be made to the city or a conservation easement shall be established over said outlot(s). 7. The wetland mitigation for liberty on Bluff Creek shall be complete within one year of the authorized fill on Liberty on Bluff Creek. SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gral place to live, work, and play. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 2 of 7 8. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. 9. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. Due to a secondary access through the MnDOT right-of-way (ROW) to the north in the northeast portion of the property, the applicant will be responsible for creating or securing sufficient wetland mitigation for MnDOT that will meet all conditions imposed on MnDOT and will be responsible for any and all fees associated with the redesign of the wetland mitigation areas in MnDOT ROW. Final plat approval shall not be granted until the wetland mitigation plan has been received and approved by the City and MnDOT. 11. The plans shall be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas shall be preserved. In addition, all structures shall maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading shall occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 12. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations shall occur within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. 13. The applicant shall submit a plan for the revegetation of the farmed area south of Bluff Creek that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Special attention shall be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). 14. Alterations appear to be proposed within a mapped FEMA unnumbered A Zone (100 - year floodplain). In lieu of a LOMA, .the applicant shall obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain. 15. A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) shall be developed for the development and shall be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. 16. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the proposed pond. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail shall be included the plan. 17. The plans shall show paths of access to both wetland mitigation areas as well as all ''I i�111 a erosion controls and restoration practices. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 3 of 7 18. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tvoe of Sloe Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 19. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and. street sweeping as -needed. 20. The applicant shall provide details for curbside inlet control. Wimco-type inlet controls shall be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. 21. Typical building lot controls shall be shown on the plan. These controls may include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. 22. The proposed storm water pond shall be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond shall be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail for the temporary pond outlet shall be included in the plans. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. 23. The ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek shall be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. 24. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. 25. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $266,850. 26. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 4 of 7 27. Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to construction around all areas designated for preservation and/or at the edge of proposed grading limits. 28. Silt fence or tree protection fencing shall be installed at the edge of grading around both wetland mitigation areas. 29. A fenced access road will lead from the east mitigation area to the west mitigation area. This will be the only access allowed to the western site. Fencing shall be placed on either side of the access lane. After construction, the access lane shall be restored according to the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan'. 30. A walk-through inspection of the silt/tree preservation fence shall be required prior to construction. 31. No burning permits shall be issued for tree removal. All trees removed on site shall be chipped and used on site or hauled off. 32. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 33. The applicant shall submit a full sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 34. A turf plan shall be submitted to the city indicating the location of sod and seeding areas. 35. The developer shall pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final plat approval in lieu of parkland dedication. 36. The applicant shall provide all design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the `Bluff Creek Trail." All construction documents shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be ten feet in width, surfaced with bituminous material and constructed to meet all City specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed for the actual cost of construction materials for the Bluff Creek Trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials utilized in its construction. 37. The developer shall provide a sidewalk connection to the Bluff Creek trail through private street B. 38. The developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Pioneer Pass (Peterson Property) and Degler property developments to the west and northwest. 39. The height and length of retaining walls must be reduced to the maximum extent possible. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 5 of 7 40. The top and bottom of wall elevations must be shown on the final grading plan. 41. A building permit is required for any retaining walls four feet high or taller. These walls must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 42. The style of home and lowest floor elevation must be noted on the grading plan. 43. Typical sections for each housing style must be shown on the final grading plan. 44. The final grading plan must be 50 scale so that staff can complete a full review of the proposed grading. 45. The developer must verify the invert elevation of the sanitary sewer connection that will be constructed with the 2005 MUSA Improvement Project. 46. The development may not proceed until the Phase II 2005 MUSA utility extension project has been awarded. 47. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges and the SAC charge at the time of building permit. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00/unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00/unit for watermain. The SAC charge is $1,625.00/unit. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 48. The northern access (currently shown to the Fox property) must be shifted to the east to the MNDOT right-of-way parcel. Prior to final plat approval, the developer must contact the Fox family to coordinate the elevation of the northern street connection at their property line. 49. The Arterial Collector Fee shall be paid with the final plat. The 2006 fee is $2,400/developable acre. 50. The final plans must show the new orientation for Lots 13 and 14, Block 2. 51. The site plan and final grading plan must identify the proposed 10 -foot wide bituminous trail. C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 6 of 7 3. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire - resistive construction. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. 7. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 8. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 9. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 10. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 11. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required on the private streets. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of sign. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991. 12. Staff will work with the developer on materials, colors and diversity. 13. The developer shall incorporate the twin home units as proposed in the sketch plan dated May 8, 2006. A Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff reek Overlay District subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 2. The applicant shall submit a full-sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. Mr. Shawn Siders May 24, 2006 Page 7 of 7 3. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. 4. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. 5. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. Enclosed is a site plan agreement that must be executed by Town & Country Homes. If there is a separate property owner, they will need to sign the consent page at the end of the agreement. If there is a separate mortgage holder, they will need to sign the mortgage holder consent page. Return the agreement to me for city execution and recording at Carver County within 120 days of the final plat approval. The executed site plan agreement and required security specified in the site plan agreement shall be submitted prior to the City issuing a building permit. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City three weeks prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 or b& nerous@ci.chanhassen mn us. Sinc I Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosures ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official 9:\plao\20o5 planning cases\05-24 libmy at creeksideNapproval letta preGmmaty.dw CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT #05-24 SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated May 22, 2006, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and Town & Country Homes (the 'Developer'). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for 146 townhouses, (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described as Liberty at Creekside. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A --Site Plan plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006. Plan B --Grading Plan plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006. Plan C --Landscaping Plan plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006. 1 Plan D --Utility Plans plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by November 15, 2008. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall famish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $5,000.00 (boulevard restoration/erosion control). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said landscaping. PROCEDURES FOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Mr. Shawn Siders Town & Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 2 Other Special Conditions. (Site plan approval conditions) a. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. b. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. c. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire -resistive construction. d. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. e. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. f. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. g. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. h. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. j. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. k. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required on the private streets. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of sign. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991. 1. Staff will work with the developer on materials, colors and diversity. m. The developer shall incorporate the twin home units as proposed in the sketch plan dated May 8, 2006. 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. yy11_ � .._ ►L . �I Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager M Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_day of , 200_, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of _ 200_ by , of Town & Country Homes. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the 1 erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authroize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomeys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for 4 permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmasters request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Pemvt. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall .97 not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are fust provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1). City of Chanhassen; 2). State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3). United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4). Watershed District; 5). Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the 0 property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. 5 CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _ day of 200_ By STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200, by DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 31 NOTARY PUBLIC MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE PLAN AGREEMENT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Agreement, agrees that the Site Plan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of 20_ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2Q.—, by DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 7 NOTARY PUBLIC Approved May 22, 2006 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Liberty at Creekside Development Standards J a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a townhouse development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Ancillary uses may be permitted as listed below once a primary use has occupied the site. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to townhouses, including twin homes, and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on common area Outlots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include bus shelter, development signage, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter or playground equipment. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet Exterior (Perimeter) Lot Lines 50 feet Front Yard 10 feet Side Yard (end units) 10 feet # Rear Yard 10 feet # Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 20 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30 % Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 16.5 feet and 40 feet Bluff Creek Primary zone boundary 40 feet with the first 20 feet as buffer # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 30 percent site coverage. d. Building Materials and Design • Building height shall be limited to W feet • Building exterior material shall be a combination of vinyl siding or shake and brick, cut -face block or stone. • No two adjacent structures shall be of the same color scheme. • Colors used shall be varied across color tones. • All units shall utilize minimum timberline 25 -year shingles. • Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front landscape yard. • All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building, landscaping or decorative fencing. • Garage doors shall be decorative and have windows. `A CITY OF CHANHASSEN ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of three (3) weeks prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of full size construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Public Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (81/2" x 11"), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc or .pdf compatible format. 9. Lot tabulations 10. 1" = 200' scale paper or mylar reduction of the final plat with just street names and Lot and Block numbers. 11. Legal description of the property/properties to be platted. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 02-03-06 gAeng\fors\final plat submittal.do M I Approved May 22, 2006 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Liberty at Creekside Development Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a townhouse development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Ancillary uses may be permitted as listed below once a primary use has occupied the site. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to townhouses, including twin homes, and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on common area Outlots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include bus shelter, development signage, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter or playground equipment. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards HighwayMghway 212 50 feet Exterior (Perimeter) Lot Lines 50 feet Front Yard 10 feet Side Yard (end units) 8 feet # @ Rear Yard 10 feet # Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 20 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30 % Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 16.5 feet and 40 feet Bluff Creek Primary zone boundary 40 feet with the first 20 feet as buffer n # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project to within three (3) feet of the property line. @ The minimum separation between structures shall be 17 feet. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 30 percent site coverage. d. Building Materials and Design • Building height shall be limited to 35 feet • Building exterior material shall be a combination of vinyl siding or shake and brick, cut -face block or stone. • No two adjacent structures shall be of the same color scheme. • Colors used shall be varied across color tones. • All units shall utilize minimum timberline 25 -year shingles. • Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front landscape yard. • All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building, landscaping or decorative fencing. • Garage doors shall be decorative and have windows. 2 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Mayor Furlong: Any questions? Thank you. If there are no questions for Mr. Sticha, is there, thank you very much for your presentation. I'll ask the council if they have any comments or discussion. Either on the process taken by the staff or the recommendation. Councilman Peterson: Motion to approve. Mayor Furlong: Is there a second? Councilman Lundquist: Second. Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion on the motion? Councilman Peterson moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded that the City Council accept a contract with Americana Community Bank for a three year banking services contract. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. PUD -R; SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES OF APPROXIMATELY 36.01 ACRES INTO 29 LOTS, 5 OUTLOTS, AND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY; SITE PLAN BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT. Public Present: Name Address Chris Moehrl Westwood Professional Services Kevin Clark Town and Country Homes Shawn Siders Town and Country Homes Tom Whitlock Damon Farber Associates Steve Thatcher Thatcher Engineering Jeff Fox 5270 Howards Point Road Rick Dorsey 1551 Lyman Boulevard Kate Aanenson: Thank you. At your April 10th meeting you tabled this item for three specific issues. The park design, looking at architecture and then road access to the north of this property. The subject site, off the new 212 access would also be off the proposed frontage road. Again to summarize, the project itself is 146 townhouse units. I'm not going to go through a lot of the details. I want to kind of just focus on the issues that were... The park area, on the site, this park area was enhanced. Includes the totlot and the developer will work to make that a neighborhood totlot. The architecture itself, there's a narrative in the staff report from the applicant itself. Talking about that. I do have all the colorings but I'll let them maybe go through that in a little bit more detail. And then the last issue was the road access itself. Included in your packet was a letter from the property owner to the north, which the staff also 0 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 commented on, and there's some other additional information that was, appeared at your April 10`s meeting which the staff, the City Engineer and I and, had addressed previously. Included in your packet we showed you how the road stubbing from the north, to the north can tie in. The complexity of this is that we know this property's in flux and we don't know exactly where the road's going to land, but we do believe that there's adequate access on a subsequent road on that north side that could tie into that. In addition they will be grading, there's a comment about the 9 foot change in grade. There's a, I know an anomaly that will more than likely be graded to accommodate any further development, so this specific questions on, the comments on that, the City Engineer or myself will be happy to go through those but again a lot of that information was raised at the Planning Commission which we had addressed, and also at the last meeting. I know it was additional new information. Going back to the south, we reiterate anything from the engineer, it's really not designed to go underneath that road. It was never accommodated and MnDot—plan, I think there's some confusion on that but we really believe that the best alternative for the city for long term maintenance and access would be studying that property to the north, and you know can we stop short of that and provide an access where appropriate on the property to the north. So with that I'll let the applicant maybe go through a little bit on the architecture, unless you have questions on those other two issues. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I just Kate have one question, if you can clarify. You touched on it briefly but it went by me but, access and MnDot and permission for them to do that. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, maybe I'll let Paul. Paul Oehme: Thank you. On the, working with MnDot on this issue, we, MnDot is still working on their mitigation plan and I know that they are working with, we're working with them on establishing mitigation areas to accommodate their needs, and I know the developer is in that loop too. He'd have to take on that responsibility of paying for mitigation and the ... that goes along with that, but you know we're still in the design phase of any mitigation that would take place. MnDot still has not agreed to any wetland mitigation off their premise. Off their site. They're still looking at the site as their main mitigation area for the 212 corridor for their, for the Type 6 and 7 wetland credits. So we're still in the process, I mean it's one of the conditions that we have with our, with this development is for the applicant to mitigate those wetland credits to ... go ahead with the road access. But at this time no decision has been made. Kate Aanenson: Let me just add too a little bit. We have identified a site. We have spoken to MnDot about that site. The developer is working to see if that site works so in working with the wetland specialist at MnDot, they're aware of it. They've been working through our wetland specialist Lori Haak to work through that so there is contemplated site. There is a methodology. It just has to be worked through the process, which is standard when we do projects like this and we put a condition on that they have to meet all the requirements, and it is a condition of approval that they have to get all the permitting stuff done, but we are in negotiations. We have identified a site and understand the process as the developer has met with them too to understand the process so it's more than just we left it out there. You know we wouldn't have put it out there unless we explored that as an opportunity so we have found a viable solution and so we believe it's. am"** City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Councilman Lundquist: Are you talking about to the north or to the south? Kate Aanenson: To the north. The wetland. To the north I'm talking about. Councilman Lundquist: ... this developer's property, how that's going to work? Kate Aanenson: It's not a wetland yet. There is a question in their report that we're impacting a wetland. There isn't a wetland there. It's a replacement wetland. There isn't a wetland there. I1 was a replacement wetland that MnDot was going to use. Instead of replacing all that, we're going to replace some of that in a different site. Mayor Furlong: So the property is part of the right-of-way that MnDot acquired. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: And they were going to use that to mitigate some of their other wetland requirements as a part of the 212 project? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. That's correct. Mayor Furlong: If this road goes through there, then MnDot will have, the developer will have to re -mitigate it at another location. Kate Aanenson: Well they won't re -mitigate it but they'd find another location for, that doesn't get mitigated there. It'd just be relocated. Relocate the site. Councilman Lundquist: Can you show me where we're talking about? Kate Aanenson: Sure. Mayor Furlong: MnDot needs all the property to meet it's mitigation requirements, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: So if this isn't allowed, if MnDot can't mitigate here, then it's got to be replaced elsewhere. Kate Aanenson: This property is owned by MnDot. What they want to do is replace the wetland. There isn't a wetland... replace the wetland. What we're saying is that that portion of the replacement is going to go somewhere else. Councilman Lundquist: All that stuff in the green. Where does MnDot's property? Kate Aanenson: This is MnDot's property. City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Councilman Lundquist: In the green there? Todd Gerhardt: That triangle. Councilwoman Tjombom: So worst case scenario, say they don't want to do that. Kate Aanenson: Well as I say, we've had those discussions already. We wouldn't put it out there unless it was a viable option. I mean this is what held up the project before because we couldn't go underneath the creek. That wasn't a viable option so we had to find another one so the prudent or the way to make it happen was to put the wetland, that portion of replacement wetland. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Yeah, I know. I know. Kate Aanenson: Okay, at somewhere else. So we've identified a site. We've still. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Well on the site or somewhere? Kate Aanenson: In the city. It's a Type 6-7 wetland which is unique so we found another site in the city. Councilwoman Tjornhom: So it has been found? Kate Aanenson: Yep. And they're ... and we've had the negotiation that identified where that is and we're working on that so. Mayor Furlong: And I guess to Councilwoman Tjomhom's question. If for some reason it falls through, it's a condition right now, staff has recommended as a condition so they'd have to come back if they're not able to fill that condition. Kate Aanenson: That's right. That's right. Mayor Furlong: They'd have to come back. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: And then we look at other alternatives. Kate Aanenson: That's right. Mayor Furlong: Does that answer your question? Okay. Other questions for staff at this point. If not, would the applicant, good evening. Shawn Siders: Good evening Mayor Furlong, council members. My name is Shawn Siders. I'm with Town and Country Homes, a K. Hovnanian Company and with me this evening is Kevin Clark, our Vice President of Land Development and Chris Moehrl, our project engineer with 11 ' City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Westwood Professional Services. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank Mr. Fox and Mr. Dorsey for including us in their efforts to identify potential alternative secondary access points for the Creekside community. We met with Mr. Fox and Mr. Dorsey to review their proposed alternatives and we concur with city staff that the original plans that were presented to you this evening that provide the secondary access through the MnDot property is the appropriate location due to it's limited impact on the overall site. Since our discussion with you 2 weeks ago we have revised the plan for the open space bound by private street D, and have included a totlot in that area. Ms. Aanenson pointed it out. The totlot will be accessed via a trail connection through here. We'll also install park benches and trash receptacle. We've also maintained a little bit of green space for passive and active recreation space to provide additional opportunities to the residents. Finally I'd like to confirm our commitment to the Premiere and Concord product lines that are proposed for this site. We have reviewed a number of housing alternatives for this area, and these two products that are being presented to you for this community provide the greatest opportunity to create an exclusive community that is tucked into this natural setting with houses that do include upgraded architectural features. Provides necessary infrastructure. Allows us to partner with the city to upgrade Lyman Avenue while creating home ownership opportunities that are available to a larger segment of the Chanhassen community. We're proud of our collaborative efforts, our collaborative partnership with the City of Chanhassen to ensure that Liberty at Creekside is a long term success for the city, as well as Town and Country Homes. I'd like to thank you this evening to discuss these plans with you and I look forward to any questions you may have. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Siders? Councilman Peterson: A couple, and Town and Country one has been characterized, are there any Concord units there? Shawn Siders: Yes sir. Councilman Peterson: And if so, how many? And same for the Premiere, if you could share. Shawn Siders: The 62 Premiere units around the perimeter of the property and there are approximately 144 of the Concord units integrated throughout the community. Councilman Peterson: There's two different numbers that I've seen in the packet. Phase II or Town and Country II has either 142 or 138. Which of the two is it? Shawn Siders: It's 146 units actually. It's 98 Premiere units and 48 Concord units. Councilman Peterson: Okay. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Do you want to go into some detail about how some of the architecture has changed from our last meeting? Shawn Siders: Sure. 12 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Councilwoman Tjomhom: I mean I have it here on my screen but I'd rather just see it. Shawn Siders: Understood. We have not altered the architecture from the Liberty at Bluff Creek community. What we have done, if you'll recall we worked with the city to develop a color matrix that would include five colors that would be dispersed throughout the Liberty on Bluff Creek community. What we have done as a result of Planning Commission and our discussions with the City Council on April I& is, we've actually developed a sixth color scheme for the Liberty at Creekside community and what we have proposed is that 3 of the color schemes would be dedicated to the Premiere units, which are located around the perimeter of the property. These are the Premiere units are located around the perimeter of the property. And 3 of the color schemes will be dedicated to the Concord units that are here within the middle. There's only 6 of those buildings so we thought to really add 6 colors to those 6 units would almost make it look like a checker board if you will. So we have dedicated you know where we proposed, we dedicated 3 colors to each one which will add some distinction to the overall color selection of Creekside community. However distinguishing from the Liberty at Bluff Creek community in addition to the site, which makes a pretty distinct community from Bluff Creek. Mayor Furlong: Mr. Siders, one of the reasons you mentioned that you selected the two housing designs was because of the topography. Shawn Siders: Correct. Mayor Furlong: If I understood you correctly. I guess one of the questions I have, all the pictures we've been looking at from the top and I know in the plan there was one side view, but help me understand and maybe you could give just the overall site picture up there Nann. For those properties, the topography basically falls off, or declines from the top to the bottom of the picture, is that correct? Shawn Siders: Yes sir. Mayor Furlong: Water runs downhill. Towards the creek. What is the view of those units in the top? What are they, are they going to be looking over the tops of the building to the south or are they going to be looking at the roof lines? What are they going to be seeing? Shawn Siders: We actually have a rendering prepared. This would be starting on the north. These would be the Premiere units on the north. Mayor Furlong: And this is how the site would be graded? Shawn Siders: Yes. So this would basically be your view from north to south so each unit, this northern most Premiere unit, these would be on a similar grade with the Premiere units which are on the opposite side of the street, and then you would start stepping down so this street would be you know on a nearly even grade, and then we would make the next step down to the Concord units here in the middle. And then we would make the next step down to the Premiere units overlooking the creek. 13 fi City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Mayor Furlong: Okay. And what's the elevation of the highway through that area, do we know? Paul Oehme: Of? Mayor Furlong: 212. Do we know? Okay. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Can you show me where the retaining wall is going to be in that elevation? Shawn Siders: Where the retaining wall? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Where in the plan or where in that elevation? Shawn Siders: It might be easier to show you an overall plan. There's actually a tiered retaining wall system here on the north. There's a retaining wall here. A retaining wall here. And then a retaining wall here on the bottom which holds up the street and then also accommodates the installation of this trail. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. Is that going to have an impact on trees? Shawn Siders: Nothing that's identified within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. So there will certainly be some trees that will be impacted but they will not be trees that are you know marked within that delineated area. Councilman Peterson: One of the questions kind of keying in on what you were offering, maybe you can put back the overall development of number 1 and number 2. Both Bluff Creek and Creekside. One of the things that was voiced in the last meeting, which I diligently watched on television because I wasn't here, was that the back of the buildings and I'm curious as to, as you look at that design and the perimeter of the site, what role, I mean how much of that will you be able to see as you're driving by on whatever road we're going to have, whether that's 212 or the funnel roads to it? Shawn Siders: The view from 212? Councilman Peterson: Well from 212 or the other roads that are going to access the site. I'm just trying to get a sense as to whether or not we should be concerned with the rear sides of the buildings around the perimeter. Shawn Siders: I do not know the views from 212. Perhaps Mr. Moehrl may have a better indication of that. How this project will look from the Peterson parcel, which you'll have in front of you later this evening is, this is the Peterson development here and this is the Liberty at Creekside development here, so we have approximately 600 feet of separation with extensive landscaping providing that transition between those two developments and then these units, the Concord units within the middle were located in part to help break up the views of the rears of those Premiere units as well. And in addition, and this is also true at Liberty at Bluff Creek, as 14 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 we had introduced a very color and some additional depth to the rear of the Premiere units, is to break up the monotony of the rear of the unit. Councilman Peterson: Can you put back the map we used to go through the, and the walkouts, yeah. The map we used earlier that showed a wetland. That showed the whole area. The one you had Kate. Kate Aanenson: Oh this one? Councilman Peterson: Yes. I'm just trying to get a sense as you're likely to seethe backs of some of those. Kate Aanenson: There also needs to be noise attenuation too but they're not sure on exact, and that's one of the conditions too is how that ... wall. There may be a wall along there too. So what you're looking at on the back. Some of these are also going to be the walkouts so you'll actually have an additional, that's showing on grade. The backs of these as you look across. This will be a restoration area. Open space ... and then these will be the walkouts. Then these will be the side... Councilman Peterson: So you aren't apt to see, what's going to go on the east side of the project? What units? Shawn Siders: These? Councilman Peterson: Yeah. Shawn Siders: The Premiere. Councilman Peterson: The ones around the totlot are which ones? Shawn Siders: Those are Premieres as well sir. Kate Aanenson: Want to see the picture, yeah. Councilman Peterson: And you're likely to see that from 212. I mean logic would say that you're likely to see it pretty dramatically. Kate Aanenson: Again depending on where that noise wall ends up. You know you're going to see it going northbound. Going southbound maybe not. Councilwoman Tjornhom: This is a quick question. You talk about a noise wall. Who's responsible for. Kate Aanenson: The applicant is. They have to demonstrate that they meet the PCA standards. Just a comment on that too. Depending on what happens on the north side ... and again they don't know what's going to happen here, but that's also going to be... 15 City Council Meeting —April 24, 2006 Councilman Peterson: Is that Creekside property directly to the north of the, up into the white? Up to the white? Kate Aanenson: No. Mayor Furlong: It's the Fox family property directly north. Councilman Peterson: Immediately to the north, yeah. Kate Aanenson: You have the trees that are on that, on the, immediately to the north. Shawn Siders: And I'll also point out there will be a wetland here and there also will be some perimeter landscaping going on along the edge of the property as well. Mayor Furlong: What's the nature of that landscaping? Shawn Siders: Trees and shrubs. Mayor Furlong: Overstory trees? Shawn Siders: Yes sir. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, yeah. And then whatever we need for that noise mitigation. Whatever that ends up being to meet whatever those standards. They'd have to demonstrate, that's also one of the conditions. Again all that would come back for us. Mayor Furlong: Just, while we're on the noise issue, I think we brought this up at the last meeting, that condition number 1 under the preliminary plat. Kate Aanenson: Sure. Mayor Furlong: Did we add in any language there that they would not only identify for implement appropriate noise? I don't see it in the packet, but that might just have been. Kate Aanenson: It's on page 17, B(1). Is that the one you're talking about? Mayor Furlong: Page 17, B(1). Kate Aanenson: Correct. The applicant prepare a noise analysis, right. So these are all the things that we require for it to come back for final plat. Mayor Furlong: Right, and I guess the issue there was, the analysis would identify, they're required to prepare a noise analysis and to implement. Kate Aanenson: Correct. I'm sorry, that should have been put in there. To PCA standards. 16 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Mayor Furlong: To PCA standards? Okay. Sony for the tangent. Other questions right now? Kate Aanenson: Like I'm saying, it may end up being a physical wall that would certainly reduce your visual. Mayor Furlong: Another question, and I was looking through the staff report here and perhaps you can direct me. The net density of this development, we have 146 units, is that correct? Of the, and as we look at that other smaller picture, there is the, the area to the south. The Bluff Creek. The smaller picture of the site plan. There. Yeah. Did we do an analysis? Did staff do an analysis with regard to what was buildable down there without mitigation of wetlands or what? Kate Aanenson: Correct, and that was an area that's in the overlay district that we identified for preservation. If you look in the staff report, it talks about the impervious surface at 30%. Mayor Furlong: Where is that in the report? Do you know what page number? Kate Aanenson: I do have it marked, hang on. Mayor Furlong: I'm sorry, keep going. Kate Aanenson: That's alright. It's on page 5. It says the entire development, including the public and private streets may not exceed 30%. The individual lots will be over the 30%, so one of the tools that we employ in order to preserve the zone, to give some value of the overlay district and just creating that overlay district to give it some value. The value is they get to use that. Preserve it but they get to use it towards their impervious. So that's the trade off. We compress that but they get to use it towards their impervious. Councilman Lundquist: Density transfer? Kate Aanenson: Well, in this case they're under the density. It's effectively that but actually the density on this, this is the one piece we clearly guided straight medium density because of the topographic behind lot, we gave that one, the only piece that's high density without a dual. And they're actually under for a 4.78 is guided for up to 8 units an acre, so they didn't maximize, going back to what your point Councilman Lundquist, they didn't maximize that density transfer. But what they are able to capitalize on is the, be able to use that impervious area down below. There's the two wetland replacements that are kind of in the light green there, and then what we wanted to do following the plans of the Bluff Creek Overlay District was to revegetate that using native species so it creates that open space. So as you drive, that's one of the things that we're trying to capture as you drive through looking at that green space, the view that you get when you go back to the original, we first had the very first kind of vision of the community, when we used Bill Morrish at the University of Minnesota. That's when we came up with these rooms. We kind of wanted to create these corridors so when you look up here you're going to actually have a corridor going through this property, the Peterson going all the way up the creek, so that's that corridor that will be replanting. So they got to compress the density. They picked a product 17 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 that they couldn't maximize, going up to 8 units an acre. But they were able to spread the impervious over that part. Mayor Furlong: So when you say it's part of the impervious, in the area, if we look at it north of the trail, the impervious surface coverage there may exceed what they're allowed. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. That's correct. Mayor Furlong: But when you look at the entire parcel, they're within the limitations. Okay. And in the plan, just to be clear. The water, there's stone ponds I see on this site as well. Kate Aanenson: There's one there, and the wetland replacement... there's two wetland replacements. And that's actually, they're re-establishing the old farmstead that was kind of a gravel mine so actually re-establishing that whole area. Taking out kind of what's been degregated and restoring that, which was also one of the goals of the overlay district. And making that a nice view looking in. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Any other questions at this point for staff or the applicant? Councilwoman Tjomhom: I at some point though still really want to be sold on the access points for this property so when I do vote I feel like every stone was unturned and we figured out the right thing to do. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I think Paul's prepared to go through all those if you wanted him to. Mayor Furlong: I'm sure that's what Mr. Fox wants to comment on as well so. Councilwoman Tjomhom: So I'm willing to wait but I'm just saying that I hope that. Mayor Furlong: That's an issue, absolutely. Okay. Mr. Siders, thank you. Thank you very much for your comments. Shawn Siders: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: At this point we will accept public comment so Mr. Fox, you indicated or your representative. Steve Thatcher: M. I'm Steve Thatcher with Thatcher Engineering and this is Tom Whitlock with Damon Farber. We represent the Fox properties and we're here to ask you to, allow us to work with you and we consider the north access. We're thinking that, based on your permission, we have available the southeast access has some advantages. The advantage that I want to talk about briefly are as follows. Item number 1 is, the southeast access provides access to a lot of pedestrian and emergency vehicle access to the future pedestrian trail in the Bluff Creek Overlay District. It also connects to Pioneer Trail, thus providing access between the development and south which would be more convenient for residents, reduce congestion on the north, east, west collector street on the north side of the development. Reduce gas issues by residents that want to W City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 drive to the south and improve emergency vehicle access from the south. The next one I want to talk about item 4. With you know the MnDot plans, they talk about and show that they're going to be excavating the soft soil underneath the southeast access road. Most of it anyway as part of the 212 corridor. This will reduce cost to build the southeast access road. We've also reviewed the MnDot soil borings to see if there's a method for constructing the southeast access over that, and yet although soil may remain ... as required for 1 to 2 foot of slick granular material on their local city roads. Geogrid, the geo composite can help with that filling across. Item number 6 is that there's advantages, there's no impact to forestry there, going to the southeast. And item number 7, no one would maybe have to pay for removing the driveway access from the Bluff Creek district. It may be desirable to do that at a future date. The MnDot plan dated 4n106 shows a cross section of the driveway reconstruction of about a 4 V2 foot high fill, 50 foot wide underneath the westbound 212 bridge, and it drops to about 2'/2 foot high with 30 feet wide on the eastbound 212 bridge in that area. Based on the information we have available to us, on the north access, there's a couple items that we'd like to discuss. Disadvantages that we see, the information we have is that the road will be a barrier between the wetland and forest preserve. Although there may be a wetland in there now, there will be a wetland in the future to the east. The forest preserve is to the west of this access road, and this will limit flexibility of providing use of these two natural resources, and will revive wildlife habitat and increase quantity intensity of surface runoff to that wetland. Item number 4 is that that north access road appears to be over approximately .4 acres of the Bluff Creek Overlay District up in that area. Next item I have is item 5. It talks about the road, it appears it will cross a waterway flowing from the northwest part of the Bluff Creek district across down into the wetland that would be made. This may need to be preserved. It's within the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone, and that must be carefully analyzed. The road may interrupt the ground water flow associated with this waterway, the wetland which could negatively impact the wetland. Item 6 I have is if the only access roads are to the north, there'll be no access to the south for the residents of the development. This causes additional traffic congestion on the roads to the north, inconvenience and increased gas usage for residents to the south. A quick rough estimate is that the road to the north, going through the Fox property, an estimated traffic generation for some of the Fox property, that road on the Fox property becoming a collector street, based on the Metropolitan Council's transportation policy threshold for a collector of 1,000 vehicles per day. That would increase cost on the Fox property. With those items, you know our opinion is that we'd like to work with the staff and the city to analyze these options further. We think that the south access to Pioneer Trail has minimal environmental impacts, less cost and greater convenience to the residents. North access would have greater environmental impact and greater cost and less convenience to the residents, especially those that want to go to the south. And therefore we would recommend further consideration of that southeast access road. Any questions? Councilman Peterson: I'm going to be visual tonight so pull out the map laying there again and point out. Steve Thatcher: Sure. Councilman Peterson: So if you would just point out where you're recommending, both for the people here and at home. 19 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Steve Thatcher: On this drawing, 212 is the gold line there. Land to the south is there ... Lyman Boulevard is there. Bluff Creek blue in here... This is on the west side map... The access, one access for sure to the northwest, which is the yellow line goes through the site like this. The north access would be along ... up through and into this road in here. You know the Fox property is here, and up in here. We visualize this coming underneath the bridge, following whatever is most logical corridor down here to connect to Pioneer Trail. The yellow line shows it right about there. Councilman Lundquist: Where's the gravel, his gravel driveway now? Steve Thatcher: It's right in that location. This black line, it's right there right now. I don't know if there's an exact location to the south or will come... where would you connect that. We know there is a plan that seems to show a connection to the south to a cul-de-sac. Connection from the north to Pioneer Trail which is seen as a cul-de-sac. Mayor Furlong: Maybe the question Mr. Oehme, maybe some comments if you would in terms of, I don't know if your presentation's done or not but I don't want to cut you off. Steve Thatcher: That's it, no. Just open for questions. Mayor Furlong: Sure. I guess some comments on what we're looking at here and what we've heard. Paul Oehme: Well as you probably have heard from Ms. Aanenson, staff does not agree with that alignment for several reasons. One of the items that Mr. Thatcher brought up was access for emergency vehicles to the south there for pedestrian. There's going to be, we're envisioning a 10 foot wide trail along that corridor there which would adequately address safety issues for emergency vehicles to get back there if any event were to occur. The issue in terms of separating, getting back to the north access, by separating the forest area on top of the hill from the wetland issue. You know the design that we would envision for that north corridor would address both the ground water and the, any natural drainage flows. Potentially a culvert between the two areas. We would not envision any significant ground water issues because of the pavement section would only be limited by probably 2 to 3 feet worth of structural material. Depending upon how that design is made, you know would that road potentially sit on top of the existing grade? Depending upon how that grade is brought up to the, potentially to the Fox property. So those are some of the issues to that effect. Bringing the road down to the south, getting back to that point, yeah there is, in the AUAR we had envisioned a cul-de-sac off of Pioneer Trail to address the future development in the 2010 area, development area. That currently is zoned I believe industrial or commercial application. What we're talking about here is bringing residential units, residential traffic through an industrial park. Staff did not envision that as a good practice. Councilman Peterson: Where's that? Paul Oehme: The specific triangle of land? What the AUAR had shown was, this road actually going away but that location here would be a small cul-de-sac to facilitate the development of the KII City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Laurent property and the Peterson property for potential industrial use, so to bring in residential traffic to a more of a commercial area, we don't see as a benefit. The AUAR also addresses this property as in the traffic analysis and we had always envisioned that traffic to be brought back to the collector roadway. The east/west collector roadway and the traffic. In this development you know can definitely, the east/west collector roadway can definitely support that type of additional traffic so, we don't see that there is any traffic issues related to bring that, this development traffic to the east/west collector roadway. It gives us, in bringing two access points will mitigate some of the traffic you know through the Fox property and basically along the corridor so stacking along at one access point during peak periods would be somewhat limited as well, so we think there's advantages to bringing the roadway to the north. Todd Gerhardt: Mr. Mayor? Paul, isn't the key point on trying to bring the road underneath 312, 312 is under construction today and that bridge section that goes through there is not designed for a road to go underneath there at this point. Paul Oehme: Right. This is a picture, that's today of the bridge that's currently being constructed. It's not a typical bridge per se with wing walls. This is a land bridge. There's actually another several sections of this bridge, and MnDot in it's analysis or it's, when it was going through the design of this bridge, it always, they envisioned this as a bebo section or regular bridge girder section, but when they did the soil analysis here I think the peat in this area is somewhere between 50 and 60 feet deep, so they elected to actually drive piles to support the bridge and lengthen the bridge to approximately 400 feet. So they are, in this corridor alone that we know that there is significant soil issues that MnDot is actually spending a lot of money addressing that in terms of building a bridge instead of actually filling this area in with soil and so, that's, MnDot never had envisioned this corridor to be brought in to have a roadway. A local roadway brought in at this location for residential use. Todd Gerhardt: So from where the potential road bed would be to the bottom girder of the bridge probably would not meet MnDot specifications for a roadway to go underneath there. Paul Oehme: I don't know that at this time. I don't know what the height is between the actual road grade. Potentially they like to be in the bottom of the girders for the 212 bridge but. Steve Thatcher: I've got the, I didn't mean to interrupt. I do have the cross section there for the bridge in that area. I know the height that they're proposing but I don't know what's the minimum standard for that. What they've got is, this is the cross section at the westbound lane and it shows the bridge from there to there, the bottom of the girders there. They show the driveway up to here. From the ground to the bottom of the girder, that's 20 feet of vertical space from the ground. And you show their sub -cutting there. Underneath where that driveway, sub - cut shows 25 feet in that spot. That's the dark hatch area there. So there's 20 feet of space between the ground and the bottom girder. Todd Gerhardt: Okay, and then the other part of not meeting the specification is putting a road that close to a creek bed. And so it was never designed to have a road go underneath that bridge. 21 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I'd just like to add to that one point as far as the AUAR. You know we try to, I mentioned this last, 2 weeks ago is that we try to minimize creek crossing and we provided one creek crossing in there for that specific reason, and if we talk about permitting required to go to the north, replacing a wetland that's not there yet, as opposed to getting permitting and go back and amend the AUAR because it was never approved in the AUAR. Go back and amend the AUAR to see if we can get permits to cross the creek and the cost which we, as Paul indicated, the soil corrections are huge there. Then there's a long term maintenance when you're building on poor soils like that. We think it's much more prudent to take the road to the north where the risk is much less. And a better way to service. Paul Oehme: Another item too to bring the road to the south Mayor and council. Right now MnDot has acquired a driveway access for the Jeurissen property. I believe, I don't know, I think it's between 20 and 30 feet wide, in order for a road, a public road to be built at that location to typical right-of-way width to 60 feet per our standards. That's not adequate at this time. What MnDot has acquired, the applicant would have to purchase additional right-of-way from third party properties out there, and we don't know if that would be feasible at this time to make that, to have that right-of-way acquired. Mayor Furlong: What's happening to that, what are MnDot's plans with regard to that driveway access? You say that it literally is a driveway right now coming off from Pioneer Trail. Paul Oehme: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Access the property ... the creek. You said it's 20 feet wide? Paul Oehme: I think it's 25 feet wide. Maybe 30 feet wide as the most. The right-of-way that they have acquired for that driveway. Mayor Furlong: But from a width standpoint it's not, it doesn't meet our standard. Paul Oehme: It doesn't meet our standard anyway. Mayor Furlong: Public street. What is going to become of that current driveway and who's responsible for doing something with it? Paul Oehme: Well it's MnDot's property and they're responsible for the maintenance of it. I would envision that MnDot would consider that a remnant right-of-way after the property has been sold to the developer and that driveway is no longer in use, the collar would be eliminated there on that crossing there. Bluff Creek. As part of the project, I would imagine so. Councilman Lundquist: They've got to leave it in there now to have access to that property. Paul Oehme: That's correct. Councilman Lundquist: Until something else. 22 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Paul Oehme: Until something else, and that access is no longer necessary, sure. Mayor Furlong: Alright. Councilman Peterson: How many homes would it, what's the trigger point from only needing one access versus having two? Paul Oehme: The council just passed a cul-de-sac limiting, limiting our cul-de-sac lengths to 800 feet. So we're trying to limit our cul-de-sac length, both as a utility issue and a safety issue in terms of an emergency vehicle accesses. We try to limit properties to potentially about 15-16 units at the max, and that's typically about how many units you can support off of an 800 foot cul-de-sac single family. And we're talking 140 units. 46 units here. Councilman Lundquist: If I go back to the road, if you put the map of the, yeah. Here's what I'm struggling with. I mean I understand Paul and Kate where you're coming from. You're talking about the potential, if we go to the south that we're going through some commercial industrial land, and you know we've talked off and on at this point about the Fox properties ending up in some kind of an industrial or commercial you know potential, don't know what's going to end up there but it's quite likely that if something in that could go in there. Regardless of whether we go to the north or the south, there's wetland/ground water type issues, whatever that might be. You know there is, you know I think there's some potential struggles there with the width of the road and some of that thing, but at this point I look at that as really the only thing that's really standing there because either way, as I'm looking at it, unless I'm wrong, that I think we're going to end up going through commercial retail or industrial of one kind or another, no matter which way we go, and there's going to be some wetland and water, ground water issues regardless of which way we go. Now we don't have to cross the creek if we go to the south. There's some issues with the bridge if we go to the south, but the way I'm looking at it, unless I missed something, I think those other two issues we're going to have regardless of which way. Kate Aanenson: But the soils is a huge issue too, you know. Councilman Lundquist: Well because you've got to go across the creek there. Paul Oehme: We're just looking at current zoning. We know that the zoning to the south along Pioneer Trail is more commercial industrial. To the north, right now that's more residential. Councilman Lundquist: Well there isn't any zoning to the south, right? Because it's just guided. Paul Oehme: Well it's just guided. Mayor Furlong: The triangle piece. Kate Aanenson: So is the other piece is just guided also to the north. It's guided residential. Councilman Lundquist: So we can do anything we want with that. 041 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Kate Aanenson: Yeah, right. Councilman Lundquist: Going forward. Okay. So are there other pieces? As I'm looking, you know that may be over simplifying it by saying you know I think we've got the same issues going north or south. There may be a degree of difficulty with the soils and the right-of-way and some of that going to the south, but. Kate Aanenson: Well the degree of difficulty is also you have to go back and amend the AUAR, so that could be a year or two. You know I don't know, they may never get that permit. That's a, maybe the City Attorney can address that but you have to go back and amend that, so I'm not sure. The other one, there isn't the soil. It's a long term maintenance. Those kind of issues too. Paul Oehme: And there's long term maintenance involved too for the city's perspective. Another creek crossing means another bridge or another structure for the city to maintain. The staff had always envisioned too the watermain looping of this area. If we go to the south, that's a different zone. We can't really loop the water in this area basically we're stop at a long dead end unless we get an easement to the north. To loop that watermain back up to the east/west collector roadway. So in terms of long term maintenance, I think the length of the roadway too is a little bit longer as we go to the south. Councilman Lundquist: So do we have a picture of what the AUAR showed roads in this area? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I don't have it with me this time but it shows the two cul-de-sacs on the Laurent property. Stopping short of the creek, yeah. Cul-de-sac. Mayor Furlong: They're short cul-de-sacs Councilman Lundquist. The one comes from Pioneer, yeah. Kate Aanenson: One comes off of Powers and one comes off of... stop short of the creek. That's what we envisioned... Councilman Lundquist: Room for access to the Jeurissen property. Kate Aanenson: This direction and that direction. Councilman Lundquist: So on our AUAR it showed. Kate Aanenson: It didn't show those specific parcels being tied in, nor did it show the specific parcels on, just they showed the north side on Lyman Boulevard, it showed one access point besides the senior Degler piece. We showed that ring road tying, winding to Audubon. We also showed another connection that needed to be. Councilman Lundquist: Like that little, yeah. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. 24 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Councilman Lundquist: So why is an amendment to the AUAR required if we never showed. Kate Aanenson: Because you're crossing the creek. That was an environmental, that also got approved by the PCA, the DNR, the watershed district. All those agencies that have jurisdiction because all those agencies commented on the original one, so that would be a significant change that would have to go back and amend the AUAR. Councilman Lundquist: Okay. Let's say, just for grins we decided to go back through that process and those agencies that comment on that decide they don't want to allow that access then, then our choice would be to give it one access or go back to the north then? Is that? Kate Aanenson: That's correct, yep. Councilman Lundquist: ...happens? Okay. Councilman Peterson: Has there ever been a community in the area that's had that many homes with one access? Tom Whitlock: I believe Bearpath is a loop system with one access point. Councilman Lundquist: Not including their emergency back roads. Mayor Furlong: I'm sorry, go ahead. Questions still. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Explain to me again why we can't take that cul-de-sac and, and not make it a cul-de-sac but make it a road or another access point. Kate Aanenson: Which cul-de-sac? Councilman Peterson: That's not a cul-de-sac. Councilwoman Tjornhom: That's what I'm saying. Kate Aanenson: You mean that would cross the creek or? Mayor Furlong: The one that they've shown there. Councilman Lundquist: You run one big loop through and service them both from Councilwoman Tjornhom: Right. Steve Thatcher: We looked at that. This is the north side of the Creekside development. This is the proposed connection north through the Fox property. And this is their northern road that ends in a cul-de-sac today. So we studied to see if you could make that loop back to the north, and this does show a connection that we follow the city's grades and connect to the proposed FFA City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 dead end driveway here and it will loop back to that north access point. That does require about a third of an acre of encroachment into that Bluff Creek tree preservation area, which is actually less than what's proposed on the north. Right now the north loop shows about .4 acres of encroachment into that. Kate Aanenson: That also has a substantial retaining wall of about 800 feet, which we may want terraced because it's so tall, so I'm not sure that that's feasible. And the other problem with that. Mayor Furlong: I'm sorry, could you repeat that? Kate Aanenson: Yep. No, the significant retaining wall along this whole side here. It's pretty high. Typically when they're that tall, we like to terrace them so they're not that tall and so again... This is also tying into a private street. A public street tying into a private street... Steve Thatcher: Yeah, that's true. There's a double wall showing on the north, on the whole north side of this development today. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, but I'm talking about the other wall too. There'll be a new other wall. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Okay, any other questions? Mr. Clark? Kevin Clark: Commissioner, Councilman Lundquist. Another issue regarding the south access is that, by bringing a full right-of-way through there, will certainly convert those, what are proposed as private drives into public right-of-way and so then that will wipe out whatever number of units as you come up into that totlot area that we've just got done focusing on. And then. I just think it'd be a tremendous hurdle for the city to ask us to build 1,500 foot long, zero loaded street through an area that's identified as being basically bottomless. Building a road that's built to float, that's going to be maintained by the city. Those are always dangerous words for a street. And I think that there'd be a tremendous economic hardship to think about making that a second access. Councilman Lundquist: Fair enough. Mayor Furlong: Okay, any other questions at this point? Gentlemen, thank you. Appreciate your thoughts and comments. Okay. Better looking council chambers. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Mr. Mayor, I have one more. I'm sorry. Mayor Furlong: Certainly. Gentlemen, please. Councilwoman Tjomhom: When this project was designed and laid out, was there any other way it could have been designed and laid out so that we wouldn't be talking about this tonight? Or no matter what's coming in. P2 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Kate Aanenson: Right, even with single family homes, again we have that long street. Even if it was single family homes, even if it was commercial. I mean it's topographically separated from another piece. Councilwoman Tjomhom: So we'd still be talking about... Kate Aanenson: Correct. As we do with every parcel that comes in, it's angst on every project that we do, and that's our job is to make sure that all the pieces of the puzzle fit together and we provide adequate access to adjoining parcels. Some pieces are easier because it just a natural fit. Other pieces it's more a challenge, even when we tell people a connection's being made. It still can be a challenge so you know. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Okay? Very good, thank you. Any other follow-up questions for staff? Councilman Peterson: I guess the only other question I had, and we briefly talked about the possibility of this loop without a secondary access point. I guess I'd like to focus on that a little bit more so we have a better understanding of the difficulties in that. Kate Aanenson: Having both streets come up at the same point? Councilman Peterson: Yeah. Kate Aanenson: It's a huge retaining wall. You're getting back to the same point, you're wiping out some of the, Paul put his comments. Do you want to go back over your comments that we commented on. Mayor Furlong: Are you saying, Councilman Peterson, the loop that they showed right at the very end there? Councilman Peterson: Yeah. Councilman Lundquist: That smaller one. No, not that one. That one right there. Mayor Furlong: The little one on the table? Councilman Lundquist: That one right there. Now if you zoom in on that. I think what Craig's talking about is you take that cul-de-sac is there and you tie it into, no. Just go straight to the east. Kate Aanenson: Go straight through the comer of the Fox piece. Councilman Lundquist: No, no. Oh west. Straight to the west. Straight to the west. There you go. Mayor Furlong: Isn't that just a cul-de-sac? 27 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Kate Aanenson: Yeah. And you've got just one big loop which you're all getting stuck on that. Paul Oehme: I think the grades are, is that what you were asking? Councilman Peterson: This one doesn't have a loop. I'm saying if you created a loop, how much of an issue. Kate Aanenson: Well it's a huge drop in grade. Councilman Lundquist: Oh is it? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Todd Gerhardt: It wouldn't meet city standard. Councilman Peterson: That's your retaining wall issue. Councilman Lundquist: Ah. Kate Aanenson: The change in grade is too significant. You wouldn't be able. They were going to the next level. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Go ahead. Chris Moehrl: My name is Chris Moehrl with Westwood Professional Services. This is just a copy of the plan that we had received. I looked at it really quickly and this here is just kind of a grade limit line. I think what Kate was alluding to is that you'd actually be removing more trees than what we're looking at there. Another issue that I'm seeing that has been brought up too is right here down on the corner. When we extend this road further to the northwest, this unit here actually will have to rotate. Move a little bit to the southwest. We already have a retaining wall there now so we're already fighting some grade issues. A rough scale maybe it was 20-30 feet and that could add another 10 feet or even longer, so that's another issue that I see. I think on this private road here, it looks like about 7%... Mayor Furlong: Does that answer your question? Okay, very good. Thank you. Okay, anything else before we. Councilman Lundquist: Quick question on the park. This is probably something that we'll talk about on the next item as well. Putting an access, the park on the east side of the Peterson parcel. You know in the potential of even putting a small access across that creek to get to that. Do you know Todd or Paul or Kate, anybody, what's the, so if we go back to the big map. No the other one. There you go. So the yellow piece that's on the west side of the Peterson property, if you took that and moved it over to the east corner, yeah. Up by the creek up there somewhere, so that you could potentially come across the, you know put a wooden bridge so to speak over the creek there for bikes and pedestrians. What's the elevation change from the, from the Town and Country piece up into that northeast corner of the Peterson piece? ow City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Todd Hoffman: What's the elevation change between here and here? Councilman Lundquist: Yeah. Todd Hoffman: You need just probably another difficult section of trail that would cross wetlands, bridging the creek, either through a culvert or a bridge. And then come back up into the other development. This is also the preferred location for the park. Services. Councilman Lundquist: Those other 650 units. Todd Hoffman: Yeah, and it just works out well. The planning buffer between the two different types of uses. Fits in nicely to the road plan. You put it down here, on the lower side, it is separated from the rest of the development and it really starts to isolate it down into the creek area. Kate Aanenson: That other, on this end too is the steeper part too. Being a walkout going this way so... You could make the creek crossing but you're on the flat. It's probably the flattest portion of the area. The Peterson property. Councilman Lundquist: And so your trail would end up being the switch back and all kinds of. Kate Aanenson: Not only the trail but the park would be. Todd Hoffman: The park itself is a fairly flat location here with a playground and an open field. It's got good public visibility on the main road which is a good thing for a public park. You stick it back into the back side of a development, it's more difficult for the rest of the community to locate, find, visualize. Councilman Lundquist: Okay. Thanks Todd. Mr. Clark, what was the size, approximately size of that totlot? Mr. Siders, either. Shawn Siders: Totlot area is actually 45 by 45, so that includes a foul zone that's required to. Councilman Lundquist: The whole green space. Shawn Siders: Oh, the whole area is. Councilman Lundquist: Closer to a half an acre or an acre? Todd Hoffman: Half. Councilman Lundquist: That's close enough. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Okay, any other questions at this point? Some may come up in our discussion and comments. If not, let's try to move along and get people's thoughts. On what we saw 29 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 different from last time or other comments that we've heard this evening in terms of road alignments, as well as other. Thoughts. Comments. Councilman Peterson: Mr. Mayor, I think that I've got some challenges and I'll try to articulate those as best I can. And I'll speak in macro terms first of all. The 2005 MUSA gave us as a city an opportunity to really form what is essentially the most significant part of our city. And to design that with an AUAR and Planning Commissions and staff and councils. And you know I think what I have tried, kind of set as my standard is, you can use a lot of different adjectives but probably distinction is one that comes forth the best for me, and distinction isn't about quality. It's about uniqueness and providing something to our city that is unique and provides, whether it's architectural style or life cycle living. Single level living. It's a combination of everything so I use the word distinction with quite a bit of thought. On Bluff Creek I articulated some of my architectural standards, designs that I didn't think brought that much distinction to our community and again I'm questioning the quality. I'm questioning the distinctiveness of the product that they're using, along with scope of the project. You know so on Bluff Creek I was concerned about the scope and the distinctiveness of some of the products they're putting in there. And now I'm presented with another development in Creekside that is essentially more of the same. And hence there's a conflict that I have trying to figure out how to deal with that. And in another macro sense I'm a little bit concerned about the 2005 MUSA because we're putting in a lot of density. You are taking out some industrial and ... replace that industrial yet and our density numbers, I guess are becoming more dense than I had originally pictured as I pictured the area for 2005 MUSA. We've got the Fox and Dorsey property that we've danced around whether or not that's going to be single family. We don't know that yet but if it's not, then all of a sudden you've got the 2005 MUSA area with a great number of high density complexes, and even the single family are going to be pretty small lots from what I'm understanding. And that is of some concern to me. I don't think that's what our residents wanted was a lot of high density as a balance there, and I'll certainly look forward to other councilors opinions so. Again, I'm concerned that we're in many ways maybe moving too fast and I'm not saying stop the developments but on this one particularly I'm saying it, seeing it as being more of the same. And that concerns me as I don't think it is bringing the distinction that we need to for the community. And maybe my standards are too high. I don't think so but that's kind of where they're sitting. So in a general sense I'm probably not for the property, for the development only because I'd like more variety. That's putting it simply. And I think we can get more variety. That being said, the totlot specifically, and I will address the whole package here, I think is something that I think that area should be left to that individual community. I don't think we need to dictate that we need a totlot in there. I know it was discussed last time and I wasn't here to voice my opinion on it but I think that's something that that area can be left for a totlot, and if that development wants it, they can put that in. If the development does go through. As it relates to the road. I can't see any, going south just doesn't make sense from what I'm listening to and heard both sides. The cost structure and the maintenance, you know it doesn't seem feasible to go anywhere but north. And to work with the Fox's to find the best place north to go seems the only viable alternative so. So essentially I've voiced my opinion on the project itself, that I'm not for it but should it go through, those are my opinions on the other ancillary aspects of it. 30 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Mayor Furlong: Thank you, and I guess in terms of questioning, getting back to your comments Councilman Peterson on the distinction of design as you mentioned. You know when you see it perhaps the answer, but what are you looking for from a. Councilman Peterson: Well again I think it's not so much what I'm looking for. I don't want so much of the same. You know we're talking about hundreds and hundreds of units that are essentially very similar, if not the same. You've got 146 Premiere in this development, and is it 135 of the Premiere's in the other? It's just a lot of the same. And you know when I drive through communities, ourselves included, you want to see variety. And you're going to have separation here but not a great deal. And we are going to see, likely see the backs of these, which you guys talked about at the last meeting that doesn't bring architectural interest. They are, color isn't going to create a lot of distinction from my perspective. And or at least I haven't seen it used successfully. You need architectural lines that change the articulation in the rears of those buildings. And I don't know if that answers your question there or not but. Mayor Furlong: No, I guess that helps. Thank you. Other thoughts, comments. Councilwoman Tjomhom. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I always have to go after he has a wonderful speech about what he's. You know I guess I wish I could just say ditto from what I said last time. I feel like I was disappointed when I opened my packet and saw it kind of looked the way it was last time. It just kind of mirrors what they have across the street, or the road and I was thinking that, gosh you know, you've got this beautiful piece of property and there's so much you could do with it to make it a distinctive place to live or a distinctive place in Chanhassen instead of just bringing what you already have over to the other side of the development and so I was disappointed that not much had changed with that and you know changing color palettes on buildings is a start but I don't know if it was enough for, to win me over as far as this project. And as I said before, I'm not necessarily against the density of it because it was zoned for that density, and so I feel comfortable where the project will come in. Maybe with just a little more thought or a little more creativity or something as to what it would be used for. I like the life cycling. I'm not quite sure if I'm sold on that. The totlot was a start, even though I don't really encourage totlots on private developments but it seemed with it's location and the young families that would be moving in there, it just seemed practical at the time. The road was a big issue for me. I think I feel comfortable with following staff's recommendations only because you know, I don't want to have to build a floating road under a bridge that the city has to maintain and has to really take care of for years and years to come so, I would follow staff's recommendation for the road if it would come to that kind of, where it was going to pass and we had to make a decision so, I guess I just am kind of echoing what I said last time. I don't have much else to say. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Councilman Lundquist. Councilman Lundquist: Well overall thoughts I think are in line with Mr. Peterson and Mrs. Tjornhom that I mentioned at the last meeting that I'm still getting, I think I'm still getting my arms around having 600 townhouses, or 600 units out there. Even that's a lot and you know part of it is, maybe I'm going through the shock and awe of that change in that stuff. That piece of land might be, but even in light of that, there's still, there's just so much about this development 31 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 that just doesn't feel right to me. The road thing, I think you know I can't argue with the previous comments about challenges on the soils out there. Putting a road under a bridge. Whether or not, you know I think there's still a lot of questions there and I fear that we may have already missed the boat on the southern access with MnDot putting a major highway and a bridge through there that may be a moot point now but it doesn't mean there aren't some other alternatives there. I mentioned last time about the park issue. Again, challenging from a perspective of topography and other parts there. I still from a practical standpoint doubt very much that residents on a, you know when you send your kids, when they come home from school and you send them out to play at dinner time, that they're going to go to the park that's on the west side of the Peterson parcel. It's just too hard to get there. It's too hard for those you know 6 to 12 year old kids that are going to get there. Now, a half acre totlot is a place to play, and I would reiterate my concern that I don't know that, I don't have a good solution or suggestion for a solution in that, but it's a concern of mine that the residents there, you know they're not all going to be residents that have children of that age. Obviously there'll no doubt be a mix but I'm not sure that we're servicing the needs of those residents there with that current layout so. There's just, there's a lot of things about this that concern me. The zoning is there. Or that the guiding for that is there. You know the density I think can be viewed as a win, that we could have had up to 8 there that we have a reduction so I think that's a win, but as Mr. Peterson said, just because it's a win on the number doesn't mean it's a win on what they look like and appear like. Understand the topography and the use of those units fits in well with the topography there. But that doesn't mean that there's not something else out there architecturally as well that would capture the same so. I just, at this point I think I'm not comfortable enough with the overall, you know there's not probably one issue that's a deal breaker for me but I'm not comfortable that as a complete package that we've got the best thing that we can possibly have right now. That we've got a little bit more work to do to go back and see what else we can get on it. Mayor Furlong: When we talked about this last week we talked some about architectural design, not to the level that Councilman Peterson brought forth this evening, but we did talk about that and we talked about the park and the road access. I think those were kind of the three main issues. As I look at those issues, in no particular order, probably one of the biggest issues in terms of points of contention is the road alignment. First of all I think the question is do we want to have more than one access into the neighborhood, and I think the answer there is yes. That's from a designing city's best practice standpoint, that's a critical component for safety and quality of life, so the real question is north or south. We talked about density and density transfers and the desire to preserve the Bluff Creek corridor and some of that, well that was the reason on the first Town and Country development that caused the actual density within the area where there is development to exceed the medium density because we were protecting natural resources. So if we're going to be doing that, I don't want to start adding crossings to the creek or whether it's trails or roads or those types of things. That would defeat the purpose for what we've already done. So the, you know I think while there were issues raised that with the southern road access, or access to the south to this neighborhood, you know is crossing the Bluff Creek the same in terms of an impact as an additional wetland mitigation that isn't a wetland right now but you know would have to be mitigated elsewhere to meet MnDot's standards somewhere else along the corridor. I know from a hierarchy standpoint those are two different things. Is there mitigation? Sure. But two different levels. The zoning to the south, it's an industrial versus 32 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 commercial. What's been discussed to the north right now which is zoned or guided for low density residential. It was more of a mixed use commercial which is much more of a lifestyle issue than, or access through that to this neighborhood versus coming up through the south through an industrial park. It's a different feel. Are they different zonings? Yes, but I think in terms of complimentary, what's currently guided or what's being discussed to the north is much more complimentary to here than what's being discussed to the south. The costs I think are the other aspect there. This is part of the give and take that comes in. There's no perfect second access to this property so what we have to do is pick the best one and everything I've heard tonight, I don't know what else we can hear but there's nothing that's compelled me to say that the north is not the best of the alternatives. My thoughts there. With regard to the park. We talked about that last time. I think, you know my thoughts are very much along with what Councilman Peterson expressed tonight. I'm glad that we asked the developer to go look for you know, can you do something there, but I think that leaving it up to the residents, if they, after they move in, if the association wants to put something in, we know it will fit. If that becomes an issue to them. I think as people look at these homes, as anyone in any city is looking to buy a home, there are trade offs between the amenities of not only the physical structure of the house but also with the amenities surrounding it and if an association totlot is important to somebody, and that's high on their list, there are other developments in the city that have those. The one right across the creek. Town and Country's Liberty at Bluff Creek does so, so somebody might be more inclined to buy over there if that was an important amenity, but the fact is we know that something will fit if the residents want to, and I think to Councilman Peterson's point, that's where I think we stay there. So as I hear conversations tonight, I mean the, we're pretty close on the park. I think you've heard my sentiment. I think we know that that's an option. Let's just not make it a condition of the approval. The road alignment, you know to Councilwoman Tjomhom's comment, we keep asking but it seems that supporting staff's position there is the best of the alternatives. It may not be perfect for everybody but that's the best. The real issue gets back to Councilman Peterson's question of distinction of design, if we use his terms, and I guess they are. I would ask is that something from the applicant, are there, you know to me what I'm hearing Councilman Peterson, don't let me put words in your mouth but it's not choices of colors. But it's the style of the houses, is that? Councilman Peterson: Yeah. You're looking at two communities that are within hundreds of feet of each other, but they are different communities but they're the same buildings. And with one of the styles, the Concord I articulated on the initial phase that that was a nice urban feel. Creative, contemporary and current design, and the Premiere just lacked both on the front side and the rear enough character that I thought brought distinctiveness to the development. Mayor Furlong: And again, don't want to put words in your mouth. You're not saying, instead of these two from across the creek, pick two more from across the creek. You're looking for distinction per se. Uniqueness. Councilman Peterson: Yeah, just because of it's sheer size. You know hundreds of units and then to drive, like you say, across the creek and seeing more of the same thing, that's a huge portion of our community from percentage wise of the same kind of style, and I think offering our residents a more distinctive variety is I think an asset. 33 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Mayor Furlong: I guess Mr. Siders, I'd ask you, is that, based on what you've heard this evening, are there other potential designs that might be available? Given the topography and the other conditions. Kevin Clark: Well going back to our original submittal when we had primarily just, it was more homogenous. Where we had all the townhomes and where that grew out of our understanding that this is kind of an enclave really. Where this site is, at the time really was a protected area. We though that that was a better fitting for that, to have, create that kind of area for that product which fit into the site very well. And I think personally I don't know if we're getting enough credit for the advances that we have put forth. Over the last 3 years, when we first came in, we had two products for Liberty at Bluff Creek. We since elevated that architecture to 4 different products. We've changed the elevation. Added materials. I guess I'm wondering when does it stop. You know we've added brick. We've added four elevations to the Premiere. We've put different architecture on the rears. At some point you know there has to be a balance there. Now I understand what you're saying about the units. When we move from the Bluff Creek neighborhood into Creekside, we have some, the Premiere units, 62 of those, around the perimeter of that neighborhood and that's why we felt it's inappropriate from both a community standpoint and a density standpoint, we are investing oh probably upwards of $5-$7 million dollars on a model center out there currently under construction, as a marketing effort to make this a successful project. I mean everything that we're doing and working with you on is to make this a successful project. For yourselves. For the city and so that this community doesn't sit there and linger, and by doing that we make the investment to do that. To do that you have to support it. You can't just build you know 5 of this and 5 of that and then expect the project to have any legs. I mean you build a model center. You invest in the model. The architecture, so that was our impetus to really then moving that into that other neighborhood. Hearing from you collectively, and the Planning Commission and such, we'd like some more adversity. We said well that's fine. That makes sense, so we moved and brought the other product up there in a smaller contingent but to break that up, as you mentioned, more of an urban flare. Get some views onto that public street. Change the geometry of the site by turning the buildings. Working with that within the context of the topography, and we thought we did a fairly decent job of doing that and meeting those requirements. I guess a long winded answer to the question is, can something else be done? Can we go out and re-engineer and bring in a new product? That's a real hurdle when you talk about new architecture. New design and then coming up there for you know, what would then be maybe a small nucleus for the effort to do that, and it's a big undertaking when you do anything like that. Stepping back a little bit, you know we looked at a variety of products. A conversation earlier was, what's the limit on the cul-de-sac because when we started looking at what would be some other alternatives here to address access. To address grades. We went back and did numerous iterations looking at single family. Looking at different products. Looking at how we could get other products into that area. Frankly, single family is just, that's a tremendous hurdle. I mean we'd be really selling you a story if we thought we could convert that right now to single family and really make a go of it in the market. And even in the market 3 to 6 months from now, or past. It just, it would be certainly maybe be distinctive. It would probably be the homes that would show up in Distinctive Home magazine, because they'd all have to be at least a million dollar homes, and that's not the market that we think that this area can support. I don't know if we can come back with more architecture. I guess as oppose to getting denied, we'd certainly take the opportunity to look at it, but I can't 34 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 promise you that I'm going to be able to come back here and say hey, we've got a new product. What do you think? Councilman Peterson: And you were speaking more to me than anybody else, so I guess I'll respond. I think that really what I'm talking about is degree. You know I approved the last project and I supported it. I think we have a better product from what the Planning Commission and you and council had. I'm essentially talking about numbers and if you were coming in front of us with 1,200 units tonight, you'd probably get more push back. I mean in my..I think we've got enough of the kinds of products you've got with the 600 in the other area. Kevin Clark: That's a misnomer. We don't have 600 in the other. Councilman Peterson: Well I was. Kevin Clark: 440. 444. Councilman Peterson: Well, 450 versus the 146 so. To that end, I'm just struggling with the numbers. Kevin Clark: Okay. Councilman Peterson: So you know, and I support the numbers with the design differences we've had, I've had the discussion with you before so. But again I think that's where my point is. There is a number from the size of it, the development that's going to get pushed back from staff and you weren't at staff's push back. You happen to be at mine. Now whether or not it's the rest of the council's, I can't speak so. Kevin Clark: Sure. It's kind of you know, that's a conundrum that you individually have to work with but I guess we've met that density requirement. I mean I think coming into this, back when, this area was guided for these densities. I mean if some of these things were out there as were taken into effect when the AUAR study was done. When you looked at capacity for other improvements that you were planning on. What you thought your tax revenues would be. Infrastructure. Viability. Assessment levels. All those things were important to do that and I think when we look at Liberty at Bluff Creek, where are we at? 4.52 or somewhere in there as far as net density as opposed to you know 4 to 8, so we've been very sensitive along with you and listen to you on that throughout this discourse. But some of the comments I've heard tonight, we're kind of, we're caught up in that more internal wrestling match, and I don't know. It is what it is but it's kind of an unfair collective. Councilman Lundquist: We did take some of the, we did take some of the, on the original project, we did take some of the industrial out of that when we approved that. The Liberty at Bluff Creek so there was, I mean you're on point where you say that you have the low end of the density here but as we look at that site as a whole, they have deviated from some of the guiding on that by taking some of that industrial out, so we are, you know there's some things that have changed there as well as we look at the site as a whole but, you're certainly on point where you're at the low end of the density. 35 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Kevin Clark: So that made, I think made Bluff Creek more of a challenge because that was an undefined situation you left yourselves with. Really, that we all were trying to deal with is that we left, there were more options there than maybe would have been ideal. Mayor Furlong: And I think Mr. Clark, in terms of giving you credit. Perhaps we haven't expressed it publicly so I'll do it now, and with Liberty at Bluff Creek there were some very good strides made there through the process that resulted in the approval at the time. Kevin Clark: Sure, and we're grateful and excited about, you know what we're doing out there right now. Mayor Furlong: And color palette was part of that but the other thing were some new design. New product designs that came in there that were not originally part of it. And as I drive around the Twin Cities area, or travel to other parts of the country, there are some places where you can go to where you drive by beige box after beige box after beige box that are all just lined up, and we don't have that there so I think from what was accomplished at Bluff Creek, I think we did make some great strides there in terms of the number of different housing products and introducing some of the new products that weren't originally designed, and I guess all I'm hearing here is, is you know can we do some of that rather than just taking the extension of the existing products there and transferring them over here. Tell me if I'm wrong. The other issues that we've talked about, the park. The road. Are we generally coming to agreement on that as a council? Councilwoman Tjomhom, again you were a little hesitant here but again talking about the product or the, following up on Councilman Peterson's comments there. In terms of the road, you said the road to the north made sense to you and you know, the park is like it, but at least it's an option. Councilman Lundquist: Mr. Mayor I would say, you know as a, none of those are really deal breakers for me. Do I like the road alignment? You know no, but does it work? Is it an option? You know of all the options, then yeah. Is the open area/totlot/whatever you know you want to call it ideal? No, but is it, would it work? Yeah. But there's nothing compelling me as I look at this thing as a whole to put those issues aside and say it's worth accepting those less than ideal conditions to go ahead and get it. Where there's some, something compelling me about the development to say that I really want these style of houses or this product or this market that isn't currently served in our residents somehow, some way. Something different about that. I could, the road and the park thing wouldn't be the detriment to me. But when I look at it as a whole, there's something missing there that isn't jumping off the page saying, I want this. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. Well and I guess to your comment, I guess what I think, to try to keep it going but also to give some good direction there, what we're looking for. The comments have been made tonight. It would seem to me that we should probably take another look at the housing products, or ask you to do that and have you come back with what options might be available, and the pros and cons then of those options. Is that a fair? Councilman Peterson: From my perspective, yeah, certainly. 01 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Councilwoman Tjomhom: I think it's very fair. I think you're a very talented developer and I think that there has to be more than 4 townhouses that can be built out in Chanhassen. I'm sure you could find 2 more that are just as good, if not better. As far as design standards are concerned. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other thoughts or comments? Kevin Clark: No, I think I understand and we'll take 2 weeks to take a look at it. Mayor Furlong: See what can happen. Roger Knutson: In order to make this work we'll need an extension on the time lines. Kevin Clark: I think we have through the 8th, correct? Roger Knutson: Right, but that won't work for us because if we're going to go in a different direction, we have to start that process tonight. In other words, we need more time if you want to actively consider something. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilman Lundquist: So you're saying from a staff perspective we need more time? Roger Knutson: If you're going to go with findings different than what the Planning Commission has put in front of you, in other words if you're going to want findings for denial, you'd have to order them prepared tonight so we could have them at your next meeting. Councilman Lundquist: I didn't hear us say findings for denial. Todd Gerhardt: But you're going to table now. Mayor Furlong: I know but ... the 8th is our next meeting so. Is that something to do whatever our city attorney would like to do. Kevin Clark: This is dej3 vu. Roger Knutson: Yes, we've done that before haven't we. Todd Gerhardt: Like I told Justin earlier, it's just like home so. Kevin Clark: What I've done is just amended the date. Roger Knutson: To what? Kevin Clark: May 22°d. 37 City Council Meeting — April 24, 2006 Mayor Furlong: That would be our second council meeting from now. Just for clarification, if we took action at that meeting, would that extension still be okay? Roger Knutson: That will work. Mayor Furlong: Alright, very good. Is there a motion to table? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Motion to table. Councilman Peterson: Second. Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman Peterson seconded that the City Council table action on Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case No. 05-24. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. (The City Council took a short recess at this point in the meeting.) PIONNER PASS, 1600 PIONEER TRAIL. APPLICANT SEVER PETERSON: REQUEST FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT (A2) TO RESIDENTIAL LOW AND MEDIUM (APPROIXMATELY 73 ACRES): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR Public Present: Name Address Joel Cooper John Chadwick Paul Bilotta JRH Inc. J. Edwin Chadwick LLC HMI Development Kate Aanenson: Thank you Mayor, members of the council. This project before you tonight, Pioneer Pass is located also in the 2005 MUSA area. It will gain it's access off the new frontage road, then also off of Pioneer Trail. This request involves a couple of actions, most specifically land use amendment from residential medium density or office industrial to low density. Of approximately 43 acres. It also includes the rezoning to RLM and we'll spend a little bit of time going through that zoning district itself. Also preliminary plat and a conditional use for the work In STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District — LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE. LOCATION: East of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 (1500 Pioneer Trail) APPLICANT: Town & Country Homes O /� 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 V Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (952) 9443455 PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District, A2 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential — Medium Density (net density range 4.0 — 8.0 units/acre) ACREAGE: 36.01 gross acres 30.09 net acres DENSITY: 4.05 units/acre gross; 4.78 units/acre net SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a rezoning to PUD, subdivision and site plan approval to build 146 town homes with a conditional use permit for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District as well as grading within the floodplain. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUD's, and amendments to PUD's because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi judicial decision. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 2 of 23 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The developer is requesting the rezoning of property from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Planned Unit Development — Residential, PUD -R, to permit a 146 -unit townhouse development on land guided for residential — medium density uses (net density range 4.0 — 8.0 units per acre); a subdivision of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 3 outlots, and public right-of-way; site plan approval for 146 townhouses consisting of 98 Premier units and 48 Concord units; and conditional use permits for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The site has a high point of 940 elevation located at the north property line. The site has a low point of 866 elevation adjacent to Bluff Creek which separates the northern and southern halves of the property. The land south of Bluff Creek is located entirely with the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Corridor and is proposed as an area for wetland mitigation and to be preserved as open space. To the north of the property is a wooded hill on the Fox parcel that is included in the Bluff Creek Primary Corridor which is intended to be preserved. To the northeast is a ponding and wetland mitigation area for MnDOT and the Highway 312 project. To the south is a future developable area that is guided for residential — medium density and office/industrial use. The parcel to the south will gain access via Pioneer Trail. The property to the west is being proposed for an 81 -lot single-family subdivision. As part of that development, the Bluff Creek Corridor is also being preserved. The initial access to the site will be from the northwest. This roadway crosses two other parcels and, therefore, must be coordinated with the development of those sites. As part of this development, we are also requiring that the developer establish a second means of access to the site. The most logical location is in the vicinity of the current farm road which runs to the north of the property just on the edge of the wooded hill. The developer will need to coordinate with MnDOT the design of this road. The developer will provide a security for the construction of the road, since it cannot be completed until the Fox parcel to the north develops. At that time, the road will be linked to the 2005 MUSA east -west collector road. The development consists of two housing types: 4 and 6 -unit Premiers and 6 -unit Concords. Within each housing type are four alternative living configurations. A color and material pallet will be established for each of the 29 buildings. Staff is recommending that Liberty at Creekside be approved. BACKGROUND On December 8, 2003, the City approved the 2005 MUSA Alternate Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). This document was intended to review and provide mitigation measures for all development within the 2005 MUSA area. At the time of development review, each property within the 2005 MUSA area is required to reimburse the city for their propositional share, based on the land area, of the costs for completion of the AUAR. This property is responsible for $6,285.00 as its portion of the 2005 AUAR. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 3 of 23 APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article IV, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article V, Floodplain Overlay District Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 9, Design Standards for Multifamily Developments Chapter 20, Article XXXI, Bluff Creek Overlay District REZONING The property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for Residential - Medium Density as well as parks and open space over the Bluff Creek corridor. Appropriate zonings for this land use designation include Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R), Mixed Low Density Residential, if twin homes (R4), Mixed Medium Density Residential (R8) or Low and Medium Density Residential (RLM). The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 36 acres from A2 to PUD -R, Planned Unit Development -R. The project consists of 146 townhouse units in 29 structures. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to permit density clustering for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for an internal transfer of density. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development and preserves the Bluff Creek corridor subject to the recommended modifications to the plan. The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 4 of 23 The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life -cycle. • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards govern the development of the property. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Liberty at Creekside Development Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a townhouse development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Ancillary uses may be permitted as listed below once a primary use has occupied the site. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to townhouses and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on common area Outlots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include bus shelter, development signage, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter or playground equipment. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet Exterior (Perimeter) Lot Lines 50 feet Front Yard 10 feet Side Yard (end units) 10 feet # Rear Yard 10 feet # Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 20 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30 % * Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 16.5 feet and 40 feet Bluff Creek Primary zone boundary 40 feet with the first 20 feet as buffer Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 5 of 23 # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 30 percent site coverage. d. Building Materials and Design • Building height shall be limited to 35 feet • Building exterior material shall be a combination of vinyl siding or shake and brick, cut -face block or stone. • No two adjacent structures shall be of the same color scheme. • Colors used shall be varied across color tones. • All units shall utilize minimum timberline 25 -year shingles. • Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front landscape yard. • All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building, landscaping or decorative fencing. • Garage doors shall be decorative and have windows. SUBDIVISION REVIEW The applicant is proposing a 29 -lot subdivision with two common lots. Because this project is a PUD, there is not a minimum lot area. The overriding restriction is that the development complies with the density requirement of the comprehensive plan (4.0 — 8.0 units per acre), which it does at 5.21 units per acre. This plat configuration creates condominium units of each building. However, the applicant may final plat the lots for individual units rather than by structures, creating up to 146 lots. Preliminary discussions with the developer indicate that they may create individual lots for units in the Premier buildings. Staff is recommending that the common lots be platted as separate outlots and that the Bluff Creek Primary corridor south of the buildings be made in to a separate outlot. BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low -impact practices. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Bluff Creek runs through the southern third of this property. All structures must maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. The area within the Bluff Creek Overlay District south of Bluff Creek has been historically used for agricultural purposes. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Special attention should be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 6 of 23 FLOODPLAIN Alterations appear to be proposed within a mapped FEMA unnumbered A Zone (100 -year floodplain). In lieu of a Letter of Map Amendment, LOMA, the applicant will be required to obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Bluff Creek runs through the southwest comer of the 36 -acre site. Trees are along the north and south sides of the creek. The area lying south of the creek contains some steep slopes and wetland areas on the west and east side. The northern quarter of the property is a steep, vegetated area. The remainder of the property is a vegetated area with gentle slopes. The property lies within the 2005 MUSA Expansion study area. Kimley-Horn completed a study on the 2005 MUSA area which included street system analysis and proposed trunk utility alignments. Access to the proposed development will be from a local street that will extend the east -west collector identified in the report. The northern portion of this street lies outside of the plat boundary; therefore, the developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Pioneer Pass development to the west. The developer proposes to develop the area north of the creek. Due to the 70 -foot drop in elevation from the northern plat boundary to the edge of the Bluff Creek Overlay District Line, the entire area north of the Overlay District Line will be mass graded, with the exception of the portion of the property in the extreme northwest corner of the site. The proposed grading plan identifies a storm water pond on the east side of the property, berms in the southeast corner and retaining walls at the north property line (two-tiered), within Common Lot 18, Block 2 (a portion of which is two-tiered), south of Street A, north of Lot 12, Block 1, and south of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1. Staff will work with the developer's engineer to limit the number and height of retaining walls within the site. The grading plan must show the proposed top and bottom of wall elevations for all retaining walls. Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. The developer proposes to install storm sewer throughout the site to convey runoff from the development to the proposed pond. Staff will review hydrology calculations prior to final plat approval. The style of home and lowest floor elevation must be noted on the grading plan. Typical sections for each housing style must be shown on the final grading plan. The final grading plan must be 50 scale so that staff can complete a full review of the proposed grading. Bluff Creek runs through the southern third of this property. Protection of Bluff Creek from erosion and sediment discharge during all phases of construction is essential. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 7 of 23 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is needed for the development and must be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. It is recommended the SWPPP be submitted to the City and the Carver Soil and Water Conservation District (CSWCD) for review prior to final approval. Erosion Control A stable emergency overflow (EOF) is needed for the proposed pond. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail should be included the plan. It is unclear how the contractor will gain access to and between wetland mitigation areas. A temporary creek crossing may be needed unless access can be gained from the west or south. The plans should show paths of access to both wetland mitigation areas as well as all erosion controls and restoration practices. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Sloe Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. Sediment Control Curbside inlet control details are needed. Wimco-type inlet controls should be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. Typical building lot controls should be shown on the plan. These controls should include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. The proposed storm water pond should be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond should be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail is needed for the Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 8 of 23 temporary pond outlet. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. Storm Water Management It is recommended that the ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek be adjusted to discharge water parallel to the creek flow; presently the outlet is shown to discharge water perpendicular to the flow and could increase bank erosion of the creek. The outlet should be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEES Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on townhome development rates of $3,100/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 35.58 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $110,298. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Medium density residential developments have a connection charge of $4,400 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $156,552 for the proposed development. SWW Credits This project proposes the construction of one NURP pond. The applicant will be credited for water quality where NURP basins are provided to treat runoff from the site. This will be determined upon review of the ponding and storm sewer calculations. Credits may also be applied to the applicant's SWMP fees for oversizing in accordance with the SWMP or the provision of outlet structures. No credit will be given for temporary pond areas. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $266,850. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 9 of 23 Phase U Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. WETLANDS Existing Wetlands Two Ag/Urban wetlands exist on site. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. delineated the wetlands in May 2004. Wetland A is a Type 2/3 wetland located in the southwest corner of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass. No wetland impact is proposed. Wetland B is a Type 1/2 wetland adjacent to Bluff Creek that runs through the southern half of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass and box elder. No wetland impact is proposed. On May 12, 2004, City staff conducted an on-site review of the wetland delineation. The wetland boundary shown on the plans is consistent with staff recommendation. Wetland Creation Plans for Liberty on Bluff Creek, a nearby project proposed by the applicant for this project, rely upon the construction of two wetland mitigation areas on this site. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek must be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. Wetland replacement must occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. Wetland Issues The applicant has proposed a secondary access through the MnDOT Right -Of -Way (ROW) to the north in the northeast portion of the property. This connection will impact the wetland mitigation that MnDOT intends to create within their ROW in this area, especially the mitigation of Type 7 wetlands. The applicant will be responsible for creating or securing sufficient wetland mitigation for MnDOT that will meet all conditions imposed on MnDOT and will be responsible for any and all fees associated with the redesign of the wetland mitigation areas in MnDOT ROW. The applicant should work closely with the City and MnDOT to ensure all conditions are met. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 10 of 23 BLUFFS Several areas on the property have been identified as areas with steep slopes (slopes greater than or equal to 30%). The plans should be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas must be preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations for the Liberty at Creekside development are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands and bluffs) 30.87 acres Total canopy area (excluding wetlands and bluffs) 5.40 acres Baseline canopy coverage 17.5% Minimum canopy coverage allowed 20% or 6.2 acres Proposed tree preservation 14.2% or 4.39 acres Developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore the difference is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage (5.44.39) 1.01 acres Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement area 1.21 acre or 52,795 SF Total number of trees to be planted 48 trees Replacement required to meet 20% cover 32 trees (6.2-5.4)/ 1089 SF) A total of 80 trees are required for reforestation in the development. Applicant is proposing a total of 260 trees as a part of the landscaping plan. Additional landscaping required for the development includes buffer yard plantings along the east property line. The following table summarizes the minimum requirements: Applicant meets minimum requirements for the bufferyard landscaping. Required Proposed East property line - 4 overstory 13 overstory bufferyard B, 495' 8 understory 21 understory 30' width 12 shrubs 32 shrubs East property line — 14 overstory 14 overstory bufferyard B, 707' 28 understory 28 understory 15' width 42 shrubs 42 shrubs Applicant meets minimum requirements for the bufferyard landscaping. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 11 of 23 Additional comments concerning landscaping and tree preservation include the need to extend fencing around the entire wetland mitigation areas that will be constructed on the south side. This fencing will protect the adjacent wooded areas. Fencing shall also be installed on either side of a single designated access road connecting the two mitigation areas so that during the construction of the ponds disturbance to the existing wetland is kept to one access road. The applicant will implement a restoration plan for the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The plan previously submitted to city staff for approval, dated 9/29/05 and titled `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' includes 75 bare -root trees including basswood, sugar maple, and red oak and MNDOT seed mixes 325 and 350. All trees shall be installed with tree tubes and mesh covers and mulched. The applicant shall submit full-sized plans with the final plat. Trunk sanitary sewer and watermain to serve the proposed development will be constructed with the 2005 MUSA Expansion Improvements, City Project 04-05. The proposed lateral watermain and sanitary sewer within the site cannot be extended until the trunk utilities have been installed. Lateral watermain will be stubbed to the northern stub of Street B and will be extended to the north when the Fox property develops. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges and the SAC charge at the time of building permit. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00/unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00/unit for watermain. The SAC charge is $1,625.00/unit. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. STREETS The site plan identifies two road connections to the development: one from the Pioneer Pass property to the west and one from the Fox property to the north. The developer's engineer must coordinate the site design for Liberty at Creekside with the preliminary design of Pioneer Pass, as shown on the drawings. Staff does not support the northern street connection to the Fox property. This access must be shifted to the east to the MNDOT right-of-way parcel and shall extend to the north property line of the MNDOT right of way parcel. The developer proposes to construct the following public streets: • Street A, an east -west, 31 -foot wide local street within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way, and • Street B, a north -south, 31 -foot wide local street within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way. The site plan includes a 24 -foot wide private street to serve Lots 5-10, Block 1. A 31 -foot wide private cu -de -sac is proposed to serve Lots 1-9, Block 2. The proposed private cul-de-sac will be 91 feet in diameter, which meets the City's minimum standard for a cul-de-sac. The proposed private cul-de-sac is 500 feet long, which meets the ordinance requirements. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 12 of 23 Private stub streets will be constructed to serve Lots 10-17, Block 2. The developer has indicated that Lots 13 and 14 will be reoriented so that the front of the units will face north and south. The final plans must show the new orientation. The developer proposes to construct five-foot wide concrete sidewalks on the north side of Street A and the west side of Street B. A 10 -foot wide bituminous trail will be constructed along the north side of the creek. The site plan and final grading plan must identify this trail. PARKS AND RECREATION Parks The proposed Liberty at Creekside subdivision is located within the 2005 WSA area at the edge of Bluff Creek and is proposed to be developed into 146 residential town homes. The city's Comprehensive Park Plan calls for one acre of usable park space to be set aside for every 75 residents. Liberty at Creekside, as proposed, will result in an estimated 292 new residents moving into Chanhassen. Therefore, this subdivision generates the need for 3.89 acres of new parkland. However, the Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that building a small park in every residential subdivision is undesirable and would result in an unmanageable municipal park system. To this end, the plan calls for neighborhood parks to be centrally located within housing regions with a maximum distance of one mile between neighborhood parks. This pooling of resources and land in order to centrally locate parks in specific park service areas results in the efficient use of limited capital and long-term maintenance dollars. In the case of the liberty at Creekside proposal, the City is planning to provide neighborhood park amenities at a location approximately one-half mile to the west and south. Therefore, the City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication as a condition of this subdivision. Trails A variety of pedestrian improvements should be incorporated into the proposed Liberty at Creekside plat. Foremost is a ten -foot wide asphalt trail to be constructed adjacent to and paralleling the Bluff Creek Corridor. This important trail will need to be constructed on the north side of Bluff Creek at this location. This trail is currently not reflected in the plans submitted by the applicant. A rough sketch depicting the alignment for the creek trail was Faxed to the applicant on February 9, 2006. Below is the applicant's preferred alignment. Additional pedestrian trails, sidewalks, and trail connectors also need to be incorporated into the project as required, including a sidewalk connection through the end of private street B. Design, engineering, installation and testing costs associated with these pedestrian improvements are the responsibility of the applicant. The city will reimburse the applicant for the cost of construction materials only for the ten -foot wide Bluff Creek Trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the Bluff Creek Trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials utilized in construction of this trail segment. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 13 of 23 Preferred Trail Alignment LOT INFORMATION TABLE Area (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Housing Type Ll B1 10,811 130 85 Premier 4 -unit L2 B1 10,958 132 86 Premier 4 -unit 1-3 B1 11,263 136 88 Premier 4 -unit 14 B1 10,623 124 86 Premier 4 -unit L5 B1 10,624 126 85 Premier 4 -unit L6 BI 10,447 126 85 Premier 4 -unit L7 BI 10,577 120 83 Premier 4 -unit L8 B1 14,365 173 83 Premier 6 -unit L9 BI 13,458 130 85 Premier 4 -unit L10BI 13,126 132 85 Premier4-unit 1,11 B1 14,568 176 83 Premier 6 -unit L12 BI 14,484 175 83 Premier 6 -unit Common Lot 13 853,879 (19.6 ac.) Ll B2 10,306 124 83 Premier 4 -unit L2 B2 14,709 152 84 Premier 6 -unit 1.3 B2 14,919 180 83 Premier 6 -unit L4 B2 10,382 118 83 Premier 4 -unit L5 B2 10,647 122 88 Premier 4 -unit 1,6132 11,869 147 88 Premier 4 -unit 1,7132 14,526 185 83 Premier 6 -unit L8 B2 14,448 154 84 Premier 6 -unit Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 14 of 23 GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The developer is proposing two housing products: Concord and Premier. The Concord product comes in four housing types ranging in size from 1,675 to 2,365 square feet. Each building consists of six units. The Concord is proposed as a lookout structure. Each unit has a two -car, rear -loaded garage. Each unit has a front stoop connected to a sidewalk system. There are eight Concord Buildings being proposed. The Premier product also comes in four housing types each with three levels of living area and ranging in size from 1,550 to 1,795 square feet. Buildings come in four and six -unit configurations. The Premier is proposed as either a full basement or walkout structure. There are a total of 21 Premier Buildings being proposed —14 four -unit and 7 six -unit structures. Sec. 20-1088. Architectural style. Architectural style shall not be restricted. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and in relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions of this section. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. Designs that are incompatible with their surroundings or intentionally bizarre or exotic are not acceptable. • Monotony of design, both within projects and between adjacent projects and its surroundings, is prohibited. Variation in detail, form, and sighting shall provide visual interest. Site characteristics that may be used for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. Area (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Housing Type L9 B2 10,968 132 83 Premier 4 -unit L10 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 -unit L11 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 -unit L12 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 L13 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 L14 B2 10,821 173 163 Concord 6 L15 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 L16 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 L17 B2 10,821 173 63 Concord 6 Common Lot 18 220,278 (5.06 ac.) Outlot A 18,814 (0.43 ac.) ROW 106,286 1 (2.44 ac.) Total 1,568,596 1 (36.01 ac.) GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The developer is proposing two housing products: Concord and Premier. The Concord product comes in four housing types ranging in size from 1,675 to 2,365 square feet. Each building consists of six units. The Concord is proposed as a lookout structure. Each unit has a two -car, rear -loaded garage. Each unit has a front stoop connected to a sidewalk system. There are eight Concord Buildings being proposed. The Premier product also comes in four housing types each with three levels of living area and ranging in size from 1,550 to 1,795 square feet. Buildings come in four and six -unit configurations. The Premier is proposed as either a full basement or walkout structure. There are a total of 21 Premier Buildings being proposed —14 four -unit and 7 six -unit structures. Sec. 20-1088. Architectural style. Architectural style shall not be restricted. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and in relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions of this section. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. Designs that are incompatible with their surroundings or intentionally bizarre or exotic are not acceptable. • Monotony of design, both within projects and between adjacent projects and its surroundings, is prohibited. Variation in detail, form, and sighting shall provide visual interest. Site characteristics that may be used for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 15 of 23 All building shall have a minimum of 20 percent of accent material. Accent material may include brick, stone cut face block or shakes. The use of any EFIS shall not be on the first story of any building or one story in height. Finding: The proposed development has been well sited within the site. It attempts to fit into the environment in which it is located including incorporating the site topography in building layouts, terracing down to Bluff Creek. The buildings offer much variety including colors, finishes, roof lines and materials. The buildings are oriented in multiple vectors to provide varying site lines and building elevations. Sec. 20-1089. Land use. All development shall create a unified design of internal order that provides desirable environments for site uses, visitors and the community. The following design elements shall be incorporated into a project: • The project shall create a unique neighborhood identity. • Creation of interconnecting neighborhoods in collaboration with adjoining landowners (street, walkways, preservation of natural features, parks and gathering places). • Each neighborhood has a focal point or gathering place including parks, greens, squares, entrance monuments, historic structures (silos/barns) or public furniture (gazebos, benches, pergolas). Community features may include: landscaping, lighting, benches, tables • Recreation facilities (playgrounds, tot lots, swimming pools and gardens). • Diversity of product type and design to accommodate different age groups and individuals in different socio -economics circumstances. • Broad variety of housing choices --twin homes, row houses, town homes, flats above garages, apartments over shops, garden apartments, senior living opportunities and condominiums. Findings: The project creates its own little unique enclave. Tucked away within the Bluff Creek Corridor with preserved natural areas on its north, south and west, this neighborhood is isolated, yet connected through roads and trails, to the rest of the community. Common areas around private street B and between Lots 6 and 7, Block 2 provide opportunities for focal points or gathering places. There are potentially up to 16 different living area configurations within the project, providing diversity in housing types to accommodate many different individuals. Sec. 20-1090. Curb appeal. To encourage roadway image or curb appeal projects shall create a variety of building orientation along the roadways; attractive streetscape and architectural detail. All projects shall incorporate two or more of the following design elements: • Orientation to the street or access road: ■ Setbacks ■ Spacing between buildings and view sheds. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 16 of 23 • Architectural detail/decorative features. ■ Windows. • Flower boxes. ■ Porches, balconies, private spaces. ■ Location and treatment of entryway. ■ Surface materials, finish and texture. ■ Roof pitch. ■ Building height and orientation. • Location of garages. • Landscaping including fencing and berming. • Street lighting. • Screening of parking, especially in apartment and condominium developments. • Variations/differentiations in units including, but not limited to, color, material, articulation etc. Findings: The proposed development has been well sited within the site. It attempts to fit into the environment in which it is located including incorporating the site topography in building layouts, terracing down to Bluff Creek. The buildings offer much variety including colors, finishes, roof lines and materials. The buildings are oriented in multiple vectors to provide varying site lines and building elevations. Sec. 20-1091. Transportation diversity. All developments shall be incorporate multi -modal transportation including two or more of the following elements: • Streets with trails incorporated. • Off road trials and bike paths. • Provisions for mass transit with bus stops and shelters incorporated into the developments. • Sidewalk connecting internal developments. ■ Undulating sidewalks. Use of pavers or stamped concrete. ■ On -street parking and use of roundabouts. ■ Landscaped boulevards or medians. Findings: The proposed development offers two directions of access to the site as well as walking and biking opportunities in both sidewalks and its connection to the Bluff Creek Trail system. Sec. 20-1092. Integration of parks, open space, natural historic or cultural resources. Integrate nature and wildlife with urban environment. • Trails and sidewalks. • Vistas. ■ Historic features. Preservation of natural features that support wildlife and native plants (slopes, trees, wetlands). Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 17 of 23 Findings: The proposed development is preserving the Bluff Creek Overlay District in the southern half of the site. In addition, trail connections to the Bluff Creek Trail system are proposed. The units in Lot 14, Block 2, as well as individuals on the sidewalk will have an overlook into the Bluff Creek Corridor. The terracing of the site provides additional opportunities for residents to overlook the Bluff Creek Corridor. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following four motions and adoption of the attached findings of fact and recommendation: A. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone, from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within this staff report." B. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall prepare a noise analysis for noise that will be generated by traffic on Highway 312. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. 3. The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as their portion of the 2005 AUAR. 4. The developer shall designate Common Lots 13 and 18 as Outlots. 5. The developer shall establish a separate outlot(s) for the land within the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone. 6. Dedication of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone shall be made to the city or a conservation easement shall be established over said outlot(s). 7. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. 8. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 18 of 23 9. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. Due to a secondary access through the MnDOT right-of-way (ROW) to the north in the northeast portion of the property, the applicant will be responsible for creating or securing sufficient wetland mitigation for MnDOT that will meet all conditions imposed on MnDOT and will be responsible for any and all fees associated with the redesign of the wetland mitigation areas in MnDOT ROW. Final plat approval shall not be granted until the wetland mitigation plan has been received and approved by the City and MnDOT. 11. The plans shall be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas shall be preserved. In addition, all structures shall maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading shall occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 12. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations shall occur within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. 13. The applicant shall submit a plan for the revegetation of the farmed area south of Bluff Creek that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Special attention shall be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). 14. Alterations appear to be proposed within a mapped FEMA unnumbered A Zone (100 -year floodplain). In lieu of a LOMA, the applicant shall obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain. 15. A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) shall be developed for the development and shall be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. 16. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the proposed pond. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail shall be included the plan. 17. The plans shall show paths of access to both wetland mitigation areas as well as all erosion controls and restoration practices. 18. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 19 of 23 Type of Sloe Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 19. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 20. The applicant shall provide details for curbside inlet control. Wimco-type inlet controls shall be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. 21. Typical building lot controls shall be shown on the plan. These controls may include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. 22. The proposed storm water pond shall be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond shall be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail for the temporary pond outlet shall be included in the plans. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. 23. The ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek shall be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. 24. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. 25. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $266,850. 26. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase H Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. 27. Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to construction around all areas designated for preservation and/or at the edge of proposed grading limits. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 20 of 23 28. Silt fence or tree protection fencing shall be installed at the edge of grading around both wetland mitigation areas. 29. A fenced access road will lead from the east mitigation area to the west mitigation area. This will be the only access allowed to the western site. Fencing shall be placed on either side of the access lane. After construction, the access lane shall be restored according to the 'Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan'. 30. A walk-through inspection of the silt/tree preservation fence shall be required prior to construction. 31. No burning permits shall be issued for tree removal. All trees removed on site shall be chipped and used on site or hauled off. 32. The applicant shall implement the 'Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 33. The applicant shall submit a full sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 34. A turf plan shall be submitted to the city indicating the location of sod and seeding areas. 35. The developer shall pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final plat approval in lieu of parkland dedication. 36. The applicant shall provide all design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the `Bluff Creek Trail." All construction documents shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be ten feet in width, surfaced with bituminous material and constructed to meet all City specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed for the actual cost of construction materials for the Bluff Creek Trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials utilized in its construction. 37. The developer shall provide a sidewalk connection to the Bluff Creek trail through private street B. 38. The developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Pioneer Pass (Peterson Property) and Degler property developments to the west and northwest. 39. The height and length of retaining walls must be reduced to the maximum extent possible. 40. The top and bottom of wall elevations must be shown on the final grading plan. 41. A building permit is required for any retaining walls four feet high or taller. These walls must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 21 of 23 42. The style of home and lowest floor elevation must be noted on the grading plan. 43. Typical sections for each housing style must be shown on the final grading plan. 44. The final grading plan must be 50 scale so that staff can complete a full review of the proposed grading. 45. The developer must verify the invert elevation of the sanitary sewer connection that will be constructed with the 2005 MUSA Improvement Project. 46. The development may not proceed until the Phase II 2005 MUSA utility extension project has been awarded. 47. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges and the SAC charge at the time of building permit. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00/unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00/unit for watermain. The SAC charge is $1,625.00/unit. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 48. The northern access (currently shown to the Fox property) must be shifted to the east to the MNDOT right-of-way parcel. 49. The Arterial Collector Fee shall be paid with the final plat. The 2006 fee is $2,400/developable acre. 50. The final plans must show the new orientation for Lots 13 and 14, Block 2. 51. The site plan and final grading plan must identify the proposed 10 -foot wide bituminous trail. C. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. 3. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire - resistive construction. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 22 of 23 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. 7. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 8. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 9. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 10. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 11. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required on the private streets. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of sign. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991. D. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 2. The applicant shall submit a full-sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 3. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. 4. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. Liberty at Creekside March 21, 2006 Page 23 of 23 5. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Extension Letter from Shawn Siders to Bob Generous dated January 9, 2006. 4. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat. 5. Reduced Copy Site Plan. 6. Concord Collection Product Elements. 7. Concord Elevation. 8. Premier Collection Product Elements. 9. Premier Building Elevations. 10. Revised Preliminary Plat Submission for Liberty at Creekside dated 6/14/05. 11. Northern Street Connection Schematic. 12. Liberty at Creekside Site Section. 13. Letter from Aaron Mlynek, SWCD, to Kate Aanenson dated 2/23/06. 14. Memo from Mark Littfin to Robert Generous dated 2/23/06. 15. Letter from Juanita Voigt, MnDOT, to Bob Generous dated 7/27/05. 16. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. gAplant2005 planning casest05-24 liberty at c kside\staff report revised pud.doc 6s—Z4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2 11:4 Application of Town & Country Homes: Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The property is located east of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 (1500 Pioneer Trail) — LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE. On March 21, 2006, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Town & Country Homes for a townhouse project. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Medium Density uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: (See attached Exhibit A). 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. r 0 • e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) effects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; C. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant adverse environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: (1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. (2) Lack of adequate roads. (3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. (4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 6. When approving a conditional use permit, the City must determine the capability of a proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the conditional use Section 20-232, include the following 12 items: a. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. The proposed development will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. c. The proposed development will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. The proposed development will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed development will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed development will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed development will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. The proposed development will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed development will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. The proposed development will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Articles IV, V and VI of the Chanhassen City Code. Site Plan Review requires that the proposed development: a. Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. Is consistent with Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review of the Chanhassen City Code; c. Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; d. Creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. Creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: (1) An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; (2) The amount and location of open space and landscaping; (3) Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and (4) Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 8. The planning report #05-24 dated March 21, 2006, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Rezoning of property from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Planned Unit Development — Residential, PDD- R; Subdivision of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 21" day of March, 2006. CHANHASSEN G COMMISSION BY: �oC Its Chairman 4 City Council Meeting — A• 10, 2006 12. Energy dissipation shall be provided at all discharge points from dewatering pumps. Waters receiving dewatering discharges should be large enough to handle the volume and velocity of the water. 13. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering, impacts below the OHW of Rice Marsh Lake), Minnesota Department of Transportation, and comply with their conditions of approval. 14. All appropriate permissions and easements must be obtained prior to the undertaking of any construction. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE.1500 PIONEER TRAIL, APPLICANT TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES: REOUEST FOR REZONING OF PROPERTY FROM A2 TO BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT. Public Present: Name Address Shawn Siders Town and Country Homes Kevin Clark Town and Country Homes Robert Nordby Town and Country Homes Bruce Jeurissen 1500 Pioneer Trail Kate Aanenson: The subject site located north of Pioneer Trail. West of the future Powers Boulevard. Oh, I need to use this so, if you don't mind. And Town and Country Homes is the applicant. This request is for 146 town home units and this item did appear before the Planning Commission on March 21'. Actually it appeared numerous months before that but there was a lot of work that needed to be done before we actually, were able to process the application. At the Planning Commission meeting, while they did vote 5-0 there were two main issues that they discussed. One was the access to the site. The two way access points, and the architecture. Existing site conditions, if you look at the property, the Jeurissen property has an existing driveway to the site that serves the homestead and that driveway shows up in this area, and that driveway is part of the MnDot agreement. It's allowed to maintain the use as a single driveway is typical. Once the use has changed and higher use is developed, it is the intent of that driveway to go away. The Planning Commission, this is the subject site again right here, and the issue that has come up on this property, it's providing a two way access and I want to spend a little bit of time on that issue in itself and go back and tie it back into the AUAR before we start talking 13 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 0 about the project itself. And that would be, when we looked at the AUAR, this is a couple years old already. We spent a lot of time talking about this area's unique development and how the roads will be put in place. ...this again is the 2005 MUSA area which would be Lyman Boulevard on the north, the future Powers Boulevard, 212 on the south, Pioneer Trail and then the terminus on the west would be Audubon Road. So in looking at the ... and applying the Bluff Creek Overlay District, the goal was to minimize the creek crossing. I don't know if you, if you look at the trail that comes through there, that will also go unimpeded, the trail that follows the creek itself. But we looked at the main collector road, which you are based on approval to tonight, and then how these other roads would be development driven as they come in. This road right here has shift the location a little bit. You'll be seeing that shortly with the Pioneer Pass project. That went to the Planning Commission last week. And then the rest of those are development driven. There is a significant portion of this, these two cul-de-sacs, I'm sorry. I'm zipping back and forth. These two cul-de-sacs right here, when we originally did the plan I think MnDot saw it desirous to connect those two roads and we argued that because of the significant wetland impacts here and crossing of the creek. Again to go over the plan to minimize the environmental impacts so and listen to the AUAR comments, they agreed that it didn't make sense to cross the creek. So how does that tie into the subject site here? We believe there's an alternative site location to provide two way access out onto the subject site. And that is, currently there's access coming from the west and then to the MnDot portion. There is a condition of approval in the staff report that we have to work through that. Do we have it all resolved? No. So we're working in good faith with MnDot, the applicant and the City as a partner to resolve that, and that's addressed in a condition which I handed to you that's been modified in the staff report. Subject to meeting the plat's, their attorney this morning talking about some of the issues that they may have regarding that. But there was, the staff looked at a lot of different alterations or alternatives is the word I want to use for providing two access. So if you look at this site itself and the challenging topography, this site that Town and Country has, the Jeurissen piece I showed you that originally is very challenging, both from the topography. The changing grades. On the bottom portion we're recreating some natural features there with the Liberty project that Town and Country has. The two projects are tied together. The Town and Country will be replaced and enhancing wetlands on this bottom portion. We also located the trail along here to give nice visibility and then unimpeded that trail will go underneath 212. Again the road that's, the existing driveway that is there is used as a driveway. For that to become a road the bridge is going over that portion of the road because of the poor soils. We do not think it makes sense for the environmental impact and just for the poor soils that it's not the prudent way to go. And the impacts on the north side is, right now MnDot is putting some wetland replacement. We can find an alternative site for that wetland replacement and still make the project, so they're not impacting wetlands. We're putting replaced wetlands, a portion of those somewhere else. We did look at, there was a suggestion of moving this project back. This area is steep and also taking it to portions of the Fox family parcel where there's significant trees and also some grade challenges, so we believe the location as identified here, with the condition of approval that they have to work that out, and I've given you that modified language. That as that road comes through that the elevation as it terminates towards the Fox family parcel, that elevation itself, the right-of-way would be fixed. Would work to their advantage so that they can tie into that road wherever they see fit on their development pattern. Certainly understand that this is a concern for them, that they don't want the road connected but it's the staff s opinion that environmentally and for good planning purposes connecting that, it makes the most sense. So 14 &-Wi,, la City Council Meeting — Apnl 10, 2006 what are the two issues that the Planning Commission spent some time with, and I'll go now and talk a little bit about the site itself and the architecture. If you have any questions on that part. Mayor Furlong: Yeah, maybe we can, since that was an important issue that came up at the public hearing at the Planning Commission. Some quick questions, I guess with regard to the proposed condition number 48 here, requiring the developer to contact the Fox family to coordinate the elevation. Are we requiring an agreement on that or is it let's, you know let's not forget them? Let's work with them and to try to find the best. Kate Aanenson: Try to find the best. Mayor Furlong: The best that works for all. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. And again, the idea of this road, I know there were options brought up at the Planning Commission as far as a loop system, but my sense is that was a single, single point. Basically what you're saying is, if we want more than one access to this neighborhood, this is the one that really is a viable alternative. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: And I know there's opinions to the contrary of what you know, maybe what MnDot may have said in misunderstandings but in our conversation with them, again in good faith we're all going in the same direction to resolve this, and there's, if it doesn't get resolved, if it can't be worked this way, which we believe it can, but if it can't, then it would have to come back before you because that's all set in place. Again just to be clear, there's wetland impacts on the south. There is no wetland impacts on the north. Okay. They want to replace some wetlands and we're saying you can replace them somewhere else in the city and we're working with MnDot to accomplish that. Mayor Furlong: And then this would be mitigated then within the City of Chanhassen then? Kate Aanenson: That's correct, and we've identified a site, and they're working on, the applicant is. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Kate Aanenson: So that's in progress, and that's the part I'm talking about in good faith. Everybody's probably in that direction. And we've had conversations with the MnDot folks, not only Jon Chiglo but the people that are working with the wetland replacement. Mayor Furlong: And they're working with the city and looking at possibilities there as well? 15 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 • Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Okay, let's move on. We may have other, or do you have a question? Councilman Lundquist: On that road, road piece as long as we're on that. Kate, can you put up that AUAR road layout or whatever, that one. So I mean granted this is just a major collector road and all of that on there, but as, when we looked at this piece, what was the vision for where this particular piece of property we're talking about tonight would tie into, I mean as I looked at that piece, obviously one of them can go to that road that was approved last week, or that we're getting ready, that east/west collector. Then that's the one to the west. Then if you take that other one to the north or the east or wherever, where would that tie into? Kate Aanenson: It would come across here and then it would, wherever it works best on the Fox family parcel, whether that road swung to the east, to the west. However reflects well with that. However their development pattern works out. That's why we're saying we'll work with the elevation. They want to stop it short until they get that figured out. That we would work with them to provide. Councilman Lundquist: But then it would tie back into the, excuse me, back into the east/west collector somewhere? Or tie directly into Powers or? Kate Aanenson: No. It would more than likely, they've got a development plans and different access that there would probably be some other road system in place that would tie that, tie into some other road system here. Provide access to all these parcels. There'll be another local street, somewhere in that area that would tie into. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council members, if I may add. This map shows where the major collector roads are and whenever you develop an area, you want secondary access points on either developments internally and that's what Ms. Aanenson's talking about here is a secondary access to the Town and Country development in this area. Councilman Lundquist: And the other thing we'd be fighting is with 212 coming through there, it's pretty tough to get across. Kate Aanenson: We just don't think it's really not. Councilman Lundquist: You'll have to build a bridge across 212. Kate Aanenson: The soils are really poor, that's why 212's being bridged across that whole section. Councilman Lundquist: Right so. Kate Aanenson: And then there's wetland impacts. 16 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Councilman Lundquist: Right. Kate Aanenson: The other way the impacts are just finding other places that segment of right-of- way to replace a wetland, and that's not there yet. We're not impacting wetlands just to put it somewhere else in the city that we've identified. Councilman Lundquist: Regardless of the soil and the wetland impact on that piece, I'm just trying to get my hands around when 212 is, I mean it might as well be the Great Wall of China because you're not going to go, I mean you're not going to take a local collector street and build a bridge over it. Todd Gerhardt: You're not going to go over it and you're not going to go under it. Councilman Lundquist: So I mean that pretty much forces you to go west and north. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Todd Gerhardt: Gotta go north. Kate Aanenson: From my understanding the ambiguity came in place is that there was a requirement to keep the driveway in place as long as the home was there. Which is a standard requirement for MnDot, yeah. So, but this change, correct. They have to maintain access, yep. Councilman Lundquist: Understand. Kate Aanenson: So some things on this, you know for example this one has changed a little bit, the location of it but those are still identified as the main connection points. The rest of them are all feeders internally. As you've seen, there's other streets that would be on Pioneer Pass, as they will on the preserve, as they are on Town and Country, the looping streets that you looked at. Councilman Lundquist: Okay, Mayor Furlong: But again to Councilman Lundquist's point, if south and east isn't possible because of the 212, north and west are the options, but west is more wetland. That's where the creek goes in that area correct? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: So it's really... Kate Aanenson: Right, and just going straight south, I mean it's challenging even to get the trail in there and that's where we're re-establishing, it was just a nice vista looking across that open space so. Councilman Lundquist: Okay. 17 0 0 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Kate Aanenson: So now we'll talk about the project itself. So as I mentioned this project came in actually quite a few months ago and we spent some time working on it. I know the concern was duplicating a similar product and we actually had them work on several iterations of different types of product. Different, single family. Zero lot line. They went through a lot of different iterations and I'll let them go through how they ended up landing on this particular design itself. But there is again some topography challenges which led to the form of those projects itself, and one as you can see there's a significant retaining wall along the back. Another retaining wall here... and try to loop that street back. And there's some other retaining walls through the site itself, so that was on the first part of the challenge is trying to get a footprint without excessive grading. Working with that. ...and what products worked on that itself so they have the product that is the biggest problem and it's not even close to what's on the picture but they'll show that ... power point that the colors are a little different, but that's their biggest product. And then the other one is the one that's the single loaded. Again opportunities to catch the views. And this one the Planning Commission spent some time on. Let me back up a little bit what we're talking about. The topography, we're starting at 940. Dropping down to 860 and then you're back on the bottom of the creek and then back up so you can see the challenge with the topography and the grading and putting a footprint on there. So this product also affords some interesting views looking across that perspective. So one of the things that we worked on is trying to reorient some of the units to get some different view perspectives, so the Planning Commission had a discussion of how similar is this to the other product, and again I'll let them go through. They've attached a letter and go through that and that will be some of their presentation. But they also worked at providing some different coloring on the backs of the, this is the larger unit. Not the ones with the garage in the back. The ones with the garage are, garages in the back are the highly articulated. They have the windows and the shed roof over the garage door. The windows on the garage doors itself so they're highly articulated. Just as we approved on the other product. So they introduced another color and again I'll let them go through that, unless there's anything. It's again 134 units. It is guided medium density. When we looked at this overall AUAR area, this area kind of has the, it's kind of a different combination. It's back behind the trees. While it does have visibility from 212, you've got the significant amount of trees blocking that. It has to cut across another property which has to get access via the Pioneer Pass subdivision to get access to that, and then that would tie into the collector road, so it's somewhat isolated in it's location. So again we've got the color palettes here similar again with the addition of one of the colors to what you had seen before. Unless there's specific questions on the design itself, or the land use, architecture, I'll be happy to answer those. Otherwise the Planning Commission did recommend approval with the change. Again I did hand out to you the modification to number 48. We are recommending approval with the findings of fact that are attached in the staff report. I'd be happy to answer any questions. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for staff at this time? Councilman Lundquist: Kate, what's the density of this site? Kate Aanenson: The net density is under 5. It's 4.78 and actually it's guided for 8. So the challenge was. 11 City Council Meeting — A• 10, 2006 • Councilman Lundquist: 4 to 8 is what the medium density? Kate Aanenson: Well actually 8. Actually it's the only piece that's really, that's only guided pure medium out there, and ... medium was it's location. Kind of topographically isolated. Right, so the underneath, it is 4 to 8 but it's still on the lower end of that so. Councilman Lundquist: So then that's that site and then approximately how much of the total site versus what the piece they're developing, minus the trees and wetland? Kate Aanenson: Well the gross density, or the gross acreage, there's only 6 acres that would be taken out. For not developing. Councilman Lundquist: Okay. And what's the total site? Kate Aanenson: 36. So they're developing on 30. Councilman Lundquist: 36, okay. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Other questions for staff? Councilman Labatt. Councilman Labatt: Kate on 48. How far apart are the two properties as far as elevation? Are we talking a couple feet? What do we have to worry about here forecasting a problem with. Kate Aanenson: I'll let maybe the City Engineer answer that question. Councilman Labatt: The elevation of the street. Paul Oehme: Well to minimize cost you typically try to maintain elevations at their current you know topography so when we looked at the cross section, looked at the profiles through this area, I think Town and Country did put a plan together showing how it could tie into the existing topography that's out there right now. You know it's, I don't think it's a matter of maybe a couple feel, if that. It all depends upon how potentially if the Fox development comes in, if it comes in, how that could potentially tie in in the future. We're just trying to give the Fox property an opportunity to comment on how that elevation potentially could tie into the development. That's all we were after there. Councilman Labatt: So is it safe to say that we're only looking at, well I shouldn't say only but I mean approximately 2 feet or so. Paul Oehme: You know based on preliminary analysis I would venture to say it's only a couple feet. Kate Aanenson: Again part of the challenge on this is, they would like to consider another land use so we're making a decision based on what we know today. As the City Engineer's indicated, if it's a big box, it may require more grading and so we're trying not to let something out. Give 19 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 them the flexibility if they've got some idea of a benchmark that we'd be willing to have this applicant to work with them. And stopping short or something like that. Mayor Furlong: I guess to follow up on Councilman Labatt's question. The grades to the north, the topography to the north of this site on the Fox family property. How steep or shallow are those grades? Is it shallow enough that with typical grading that a city street would be able to get put in within our ordinance requirements? Paul Oehme: Yes. When we looked at a plan profile I believe the profile showed about a 5% grade. It wasn't anything too significant. As you move farther to the west of this property and the tree line, those are the grades that we try to avoid. Those are 20% grades. 3 to 1 slopes in most of that area so we're trying to avoid that by pushing the road farther to the east. Mayor Furlong: So by pushing it to the east we avoid the situation where we're putting in a future connection that's going to hit a too steep of a grade. Paul Oehme: ...retaining walls and all the infrastructure and costs associated with that. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And the balance is how east you have to go before you reach those proper grades on the north side? Paul Oehme: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Question with regard to condition number 1 under the preliminary plat. Ms. Aanenson, it speaks to noise being generated from new Highway 212. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: And I guess my question there is, the statement says the analysis will identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes. I guess two questions. One is, is by who standards? I'm wondering if we qualify to include MnDot standards, since I believe that is what the standards are along current corridor for existing homes. Maybe their standards at the time of final plat in case that comes up and does this require that mitigation to take place on the part of the applicant would be the second question. Kate Aanenson: Yes. If they do, if there's noise there and the AUAR identified those properties that are closer to the 212 that would have noise, similar to we did that on Arboretum Village on Pulte Homes as mitigated by putting in air conditioning units so you don't have to have windows open. Some of those sort of things and type of construction, so they would give us the noise study and based on that would provide mitigation measures for that. Mayor Furlong: And I guess that's the second part. This condition says it's to identify appropriate noise measures to meet the standard for residential homes. First question is who's standards? Second is, where's the second part that says. Kate Aanenson: Identify and comply with. 20 City Council Meeting — API10, 2006 • Mayor Furlong: Comply or city requirement I guess. Maybe it's a question of some wording so that the condition is not just to identify what needs to be done but the condition requires it to be done. Let's implement it yet. Paul Oehme: This item referred MnDot that they used on 212 was a federal highway standard so that potentially could be implemented in this situation. Mayor Furlong: So whatever that standard is, because that is a standard that existing residents are receiving and one that I think we should require new developers to provide as well. Kate Aanenson: Can I ask if that's adequate then, implementation for the highway centers? Mayor Furlong: The analysis will identify proper mitigation measures. Kate Aanenson: And implementation of those measures. Mayor Furlong: And implementation of those measures and the standards would be federal Mr. Oehme, Federal Highway. Paul Oehme: Federal Highway Administration. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, there's PCA standards. Roger Knutson: There's a State Noise Standard as well. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So you'll get all that in there and make sure we've got it in the right order by the time we get to that. Thank you. Any other questions for staff at this time? Councilwoman Tjornhom: This is going the other direction I guess but in looking at this development, it's 147 units. Kind of sandwiched inbetween busy road. I'm surprised that the Planning Commissioners, someone didn't bring up, and I know, I'm not one that likes to force parks on developers. There is no like even totlot or anything like that. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, there is a couple of open spaces in there and I'll let them go through that when they make their presentation and talk about that. There is a couple of open spaces, and the trail that gets you over to the park on Pioneer Pass. We do have a 8 acre park on the Pioneer Pass, but there are some open area spaces. Some gathering places and I'll let them talk about that and how they located those. Councilwoman Tjomhom: ...if I'm a young mom and I've got to get my child, I'm not going to take them across 212 in my stroller. Kate Aanenson: Good question. Todd Gerhardt: You can always take the creek 21 0 0 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Councilwoman Tjornhom: Thanks. Mayor Furlong: Boat... Any other questions for staff at this time? Sounds like we have some for the applicant or we're waiting for their presentation. So at this point I would invite the applicant to come forward. Shawn Siders: Good evening Mayor Furlong and council members. My name is Shawn Siders with Town and Country Homes. We're a K. Hovnanian Company. With me this evening is Kevin Clark, our Vice President of Land Development, as well as Robert Nordby, one of our project managers. We're pleased to be here this evening seeking approval of the Liberty at Creekside preliminary plat. The plans that you have in front of you this evening represent a collaborative effort that represent the hard effort, hard work efforts of the Planning Commission, city staff and the parks board. Their hard work and shared vision have helped us to refine these plans to what you have in front of you this evening. With that, I would like to discuss the unique features of this site and I've identified 8 of those features within the development that I would like to review with you in greater detail this evening. Those are how the site design takes advantage of the nature features. The expanded homesite offering. The very building layout. Open space within the private street D. Additional site parking. Retaining walls minimized. The trail alignment... preliminary plat plan that we have just kind of evolved over the last few months based on our discussions with staff and Planning Commission and the parks board. As you can see the units are situated to take advantage of the natural grades as Ms. Aanenson pointed out. We have preserved the southern open space and that will be enhanced with the wetland mitigation area as well as the revegetation plan for the farmed area. If you recall Liberty on Bluff Creek, we were able to preserve the open space on the north and south ends of the development with the housing units tucked in between those two open spaces. With this development we've actually been able to incorporate the home sites within the natural features of the site which will enhance the views to each of the homeowners. We have tiered the neighborhood, as Ms. Aanenson showed on that illustration from north to south so that each home will have a view of the open space. And the community is tucked into the natural setting and is surrounded on 3 sides by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. When we originally presented this plan to the Planning Commission in August we proposed the development of a homogenous community with a single home product. Since that time we have introduced a second housing unit which is actually within the middle of the development along public street A. The home sites around the perimeter of the development which are larger units which are the Premiere units have been strategically located actually so we can take better advantage of the natural grades while trying to minimize retaining walls and overall disturbance within the site. We've also varied the building layout. We have situated the home sites to offer views of the open space. We have varied the layout of the buildings so that we can enhance the views of the streetscape and a good example of that is actually right here in the middle of public street A where we have rotated those Concord units 90 degrees to offer enhanced views to those particular homeowners, but also to break up the monotony of the street design of the street. We've also created additional parking on the site. In total we're providing 661 parking spaces, 292 of those will be contained within the garages. 292 will be driveway spaces. There are 21 visitor spaces with 11 parking spaces and I apologize it's hard to see. Right here within public street, private street D, and then there's also an additional 10 visitor parking spaces within private street C. There's 22 City Council Meeting — At 10, 2006 0 room within the public street there to accommodate 56 on street parking spaces, and the city code requires that we provide 292 parking spaces, so we have a surplus actually of 369 parking spaces on the site. We've also worked awfully diligently to reduce the, to minimize to the extent possible the height of the retaining walls on the site. Since we first presented these plans to the Planning Commission in August we've actually we've been able to reduce the height of the retaining walls by a third. Of course we do understand that retaining walls that are over 4 feet in height do need to be designed by a structural engineer and approved by the building official and we have no problem complying with that. The trail configuration is another, was another collaborative effort with ourselves, the park board, as well as Mr. Hoffman, Director of Parks and Recreation. We worked hard to identify this trail configuration through the south of the development, overlooking the natural features which we are enhancing. We understand that the trail was a major component of the Bluff Creek trail network and you will note as well that the trail does not propose any creek crossings, which as Ms. Aanenson pointed out is a major consideration of the AUAR. We also worked with the city to identify the preferred location for site access. Of course the primary site access will be off of Bluff Creek Boulevard, which is the proposed east/west collector road. We're working with the city to obtain the necessary right-of- way through the Degler and Peterson parcels. We also, we have to thank Ms. Haak and Ms. Aanenson for their diligence in helping us find the secondary, the appropriate secondary access point through the MnDot property and we are prepared to work with MnDot as well as the City to proceed with those plans to construct the secondary access through the MnDot parcel and of course we have no problems with complying with condition 48 which is to keep, to work with the Fox property and to keep them informed as we evolve through the planning process and through the permitting process with MnDot. During our discussion with the Planning Commission we were challenged by them to create a unique identity for Liberty at Creekside through the use of colors and an iteration of the color scheme that we proposed for Liberty on Bluff Creek. With that challenge we actually went back and have added a sixth color scheme to the Liberty at Creekside collection but the sixth color scheme will be unique to Liberty at Creekside, and because the number of units of course is certainly smaller, or there's not as many, we would propose that we dedicate 3 color schemes to the Premiere units, which are around the perimeter of the development, and 3 color schemes will be dedicated to the Concord units so we really feel that we have met that challenge that the Planning Commission, we're proud that we could work with the city to enhance the site. Each color scheme also has a unique brick or stone with it, and I apologize. I don't have the stone with me this evening. We have to get revised boards and we'll provide to the city once we get to the building permit process, but the brick and stone as well as the applications of the color treatments throughout each building really creates a sense of place and insures that there's no monotonous feel to the community. Next I'd like to talk a little bit about our housing collection that we are proposing on this site. The first is a Premiere unit which is our traditional townhome. We are proposing 98 units to be located around the perimeter of the development to take advantage of the natural grades that are offered to us. These homes do offer 3 levels of living space. There is an option for a master suite within these units as well which of course do offer an additional life cycle housing opportunity to the current and future residents. These range in square footage from 1,500 to 2,400 finished square feet. As you can see there's a 2 car front loaded garage and the price point is $275,000 to $300,000. As you can see we have introduced a secondary color to the rear of the Premiere units so that, to address the concerns that were previously discussed by the Planning Commission as well as the City Council for going forward through the planning process of Liberty on Bluff 23 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 • Creek. The second collection was the Concord collection which is our urban row home. We propose development of 48 of these units within the interior of the development. These also offer 3 levels of living space. These range in square footage from 1,700 to 2,400 square feet. These have a 2 car rear loaded tuck under garage. There's a raised deck overlooking the common areas and these will range in price from $230,000 to $250,000. We would enhance the architectural features of the Concord units as well by implementing additional stone and brick veneer. Also offering shakes to really enhance the overall architecture of what is typical of these types of units in other communities. And then that's the end of my presentation, if we can switch to the display here. Okay, there were some questions regarding the views of the Liberty Creekside community from the Peterson parcel once it's fully developed, and this view actually is taken as a snapshot at the closest location between the two developments. This area here represents approximately 600 feet of distance between the two developments. As you can see it will be heavily landscaped so that there would not be much of a view between the two communities. We really feel that this is a nice transition between the single family residential neighborhood, planned for the Peterson parcel, and our more dense townhome development on the Jeurissen parcel. Finally with respect to during the review process we met with city management and city staff and we discussed the need to upgrade Lyman Avenue. Based on the plans presented to you tonight we understand that the city needs to upgrade Lyman Avenue and we're prepared to share in the costs to upgrade Lyman Avenue and with that we support that and we look forward to partnering with the city, just like we did on the collector road as well as the other improvements like the trail ... to make the improvements for the area. With that I'd like to thank city staff for their strong support during the evolution of these plans. Without them, without their assistance we certainly wouldn't have been here this evening. I'd like to thank you for your previous support on Liberty on Bluff Creek, as well as hope for your support this evening for the approval at Creekside plans and I'd be happy to take any questions you have. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for the applicant, Mr. Siders. Councilman Lundquist: Mr. Siders, the two types of, or titles of units that you have in there, as I'm going back to the previous Liberty at Bluff Creek. Are those two types of units included in that development? Shawn Siders: Yes sir they are. Actually the Premiere units, which are these right here, are what we're proposing... Those are actually the least used in the Liberty on Bluff Creek because we were actually only proposing to develop 62 of those on Liberty on Bluff Creek, so the reason we selected these two units is they are more of, two of our more popular units so we would like to hold out with you know Liberty on Bluff Creek going into Liberty at Creekside, so from a business perspective, because the Premiere units specifically, we don't have as many units on Liberty on Bluff Creek and they are our more popular units. We would like to go into Creekside so that they will really support one another and not ... to the home buyers. Councilman Lundquist: And then the other one, the Concord, is that right? Shawn Siders: Yes sir. Councilman Lundquist: Is that one, do we have that in the other one as well? 24 City Council Meeting — A• 10, 2006 Shawn Siders: Yes sir. We have 146 units. Councilman Lundquist: Then, so what you're proposing with these two, are these the, well I guess I'll call them the Chanhassen version of these two with the upgraded architecture and we worked really hard on that other one to kind of minimize that barracks and hotel look to them. Shawn Siders: Well we certainly have upgraded our architecture that we do not have in other communities, yes. Councilman Lundquist: And it's identical to or same concept. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, actually there's just one more differentiation and that would be the color on the back. Shawn Siders: Yes, that's correct. Kate Aanenson: And then again on the back of the, I'm not sure what, is that, remember I talked about the back. Yeah, they're very articulated in the back with the shed roof over the garage. Other shutters and that I think was a big change from what we saw in other communities. We need to have a color drawing on the back. I have a reduction here but, to us we felt that was equally important. I think the Planning Commission wanted to make sure that the perspectives were equal on all sides and that's what they spent some time discussing too. Councilman Lundquist: Okay. Mayor Furlong: And I guess just to clarify Councilman Lundquist if I understand your question. You're saying that the architectural and color schemes are the, at the same level as Liberty at Bluff Creek or changed with the. Kate Aanenson: Plus one, yeah. Shawn Siders: They are certainly elevated and use differently, if I may interrupt. I apologize. So they'd be, introduce the additional color as well as we have, because there's fewer numbers of units we would propose that we designate certain color schemes to those specific units just to create a different sense, you know in addition to the other overall site characteristics that we've tried to integrate within the development. Mayor Furlong: Wasn't that done as well, the color schemes were assigned to certain units in the Liberty on Bluff Creek as well, or no? Kate Aanenson: They're just taking a little bit different design of that. When it comes back for final plat you'll see that it's like a story book with a color palette picked out for each unit so there's no similar colors next to each other. But what he's calling out is, with the product to be certain colors limited. OR City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 • Shawn Siders: To the Premiere and to the Concord, yes. Kate Aanenson: 3 and 3, plus a different veneers, brick, stone and then the shutters and some of the additional articulation. Mayor Furlong: And are those changes from Liberty at Bluff Creek? Shawn Siders: Yes. Kate Aanenson: I was going to say no but. Kevin Clark: Kevin Clark, Town and Country Homes. I think Mayor to answer your question, I think what we were going to do and how we've laid out Liberty at Bluff Creek is that we would alter, alternate the colors throughout the different home styles using all the palettes as opposed to what we think would be appropriate here would be to designate 3 of each of the palettes to a specific home style, and then have the differentiation along those home styles. So we're at more of a quilt kind of scenario at Bluff Creek. Here we'll designate or what we're proposing to do is designate a specific. Councilman Lundquist: More like stripes instead of a quilt. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Kevin Clark: Well, okay. We just throw out a little differentiation that way rather than having it, because it's smaller, rather than having it go jump from building to building, to alternate it by product. Kate Aanenson: Right, and not quite as busy maybe. It's a little bit smaller, little bit quainter. Kevin Clark: Because the other site is, understand it's much larger and it has more, it has four unique areas to it. Rather than having a larger sampling of colors in those seemed appropriate. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Other questions. Please, Councilwoman Tjomhom. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Alright, to start out, what is the ... brick and stone that's being used? Shawn Siders: Excuse me, can you repeat the question? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Percentage of brick and stone being used in the front. Do you have a formula for that? Shawn Siders: It varies but it's at a minimum of 25% by city code. But in some, for instance like on this particular unit if we can go to the overhead. Okay, this actually has an expansion of the brick or stone veneer up to you know three-fourths of the unit and I apologize, it's not very distinguishable here but, there is brick and stone there that... 26 City Council Meeting — A• 10, 2006 Councilwoman Tjomhom: So you say veneer, so it's not real brick or stone. Kevin Clark: No, it's real brick. It's not thin brick. It's real brick. It's just that... Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. Mayor Furlong: There's a framed wall behind it. Kevin Clark: Correct. Councilwoman Tjomhom: The price points of this compared to Bluff Creek, are they the same? Shawn Siders: Very similar. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Higher? Lower? Shawn Siders: Depending on the homes, they're probably a little slightly higher than Liberty at Bluff Creek. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay, and that's just because of the location? Shawn Siders: Just location. The cost of the development. This is ... as Kate pointed out ... cost in development is in addition to that building. It is a fairly unique view within this whole AUAR area just because of what we've been able to accomplish with on the site. Councilwoman Tjomhom: And then getting back to the architecture. I'm struggling with the back of these units. Kind of monotonous feel to it. What did we do, and I don't see copies of the back of what happened at Bluff Creek with the architecture. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, some of those had, actually had patios or decks off the back, depending on. Shawn Siders: This is depending on the deck. Some of them are walkouts. Some of them are look outs so it depends on how the specific unit is treated and how we can take advantage of grades or not take advantage of grades certainly has an affect on how the backs of the units were created. Kate Aanenson: And I was going to say, it's not a smooth back. It is, it's hard to see in the drawing but it's articulated so there's movement in the back so there's shadowing. Mayor Furlong: The roof line is probably your best way to see that with the interior, the two interior units seem to be, I assume they're recessed as opposed to just stopping the roof shorter. Straight wall. Try not to assume up here. Kate Aanenson: Yes. And you can see on the end units there's shutters on the backs of those, and those are the little things that add the additional articulation so. 27 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. Mayor Furlong: And I guess just to clarify then to Councilwoman Tjomhom's question, how is this different because this was an issue that we brought up at Bluff Creek as well. The view of the back and how is this different from what we did there? Or is it the same? Kate Aanenson: I think it's the same. It ended up the same but what we did is we got the articulation, we put the shutters on. We did those little things so you don't look at the bland and I kind of compared it to a lot of other you know houses where they put brick on the front and kind of the back tends to be maybe not as spiced up, if I can use that word. Mayor Furlong: Forgotten. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. So I think we did, and again some of those on Liberty had decks off the back so, depending on the grade, so they're not all the same. Councilwoman Tjomhom: And will these have decks off the back? Shawn Siders: Some will where the opportunity exists you know from the certain grades... Kate Aanenson: Probably be an option. Shawn Siders: ...patios and here again you can't see it very well but there is a patio coming out of the screened door on those units. Kevin Clark: The area that ... for walkouts, that whole perimeter to the east, those will all have 3 story back with decks. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. And Bluff Creek, as I recall, I thought we had a little bit of discussion about affordable housing in there in that. Will this have any of that? Shawn Siders: ...good time to bring the discussion up. We understand the need for affordable housing, although because ... high development costs, I mean we do not have a partnership with NBFA nor the Met Council with which can support that so we certainly understand the need for affordable housing, but it will not have a component of that in that, by our own doing I guess. If somebody wanted to you know work with NBFA as a first time home buyer with ... so if they're able to work through their letters and put that together, you know we're not going to not allow this to happen I guess. Kate Aanenson: Excuse me, what was that price point on the Concord? Shawn Siders: 230 to 250. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, so we're close. I mean it's, for what the Met Council standard is now and that's the goal we're setting so there might be something depending on, at a first time buyer. IV City Council Meeting — A• 10, 2006 • They may come in just at market rate, depending on the ad that they put in. The additional features. You might just get some that come in at market rate and that's how we looked at Liberty at Bluff Creek. If someone would come in, some of those interior units, the smaller ones would come in at that price point for market rate so. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. Mayor Furlong: And if I could follow up on that a little further. With regard to those price points, is it, is that the range in which all the units will be sold or is that the, you drive by and you say as low as and you see a number on the sign for some development so I guess my question is, with the different options. You had A, B, C, D for some of the units, and others, in all those options, they would sell within those price ranges or would there be more? Shawn Siders: Some of them would certainly take the prices a little bit higher depending on the types of upgrades but that, the units we presented this evening certainly represents a very well collective use of features. You know if somebody would want to add ... but I can't stand here and tell you for sure that if we added every single unit to a home that, you know to the Premiere home overlooking the creek, that may not escalate above the 300 price point. Mayor Furlong: And as you operate, how do you determine which features go into a home? Is that the choice of the first buyer or is that, do you pre -determine features that will be in which unit? Shawn Siders: It's depending on how the homes are built. If we're specifying... then the features will be pre -determined. However if there's some ... where a buyer gets in previous to us actually coming out of the ground with it, then they'll be able to designate which features they will and won't want. Mayor Furlong: How do you anticipate this development developing with those two options? Shawn Siders: I would say that this feeding into Liberty at Bluff Creek, buyers will probably have more options on this because we do have Liberty at Bluff Creek that we can model obviously, and certainly have them ... or a whole set of units that we would need models on just because the sales operation will actually have ... Liberty at Bluff Creek and we're proposing to put in an excess of a million dollar sales center in addition to all the modes so that this will feed right from that. Mayor Furlong: So you have, I'm sorry Mr. Clark. Kevin Clark: I was just going to expand on your earlier questions. These really are the ... for the different square footages but the Premiere with that ... maxing it out with options you'll be upwards of 4, close to 5 on some sections considering it will be a year, year and a half down. Mayor Furlong: But that would be at the home buyer's desire. 29 0 0 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Kevin Clark: It's probably more, it will be less, or it will be less specifying the townhome units than they will be others, just from the nature of construction style. There's more flexibility... Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Go ahead, jump in. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I have a couple more questions and just to clarify. You probably said it Kate and I, or it was in my packet. The open space, is that dedicated? Kate Aanenson: No, it's private. Councilwoman Tjomhom: So that can be developed at some point in time? Kate Aanenson: No. When we approved the PUD, one of the conditions is we approved the site plan as shown. They'd have to come back because you're approving the number of units. They can't add additional units unless they came back and rezoned the property because what you're approving is that specific plan. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. Go ahead. Shawn Siders: I was going to say, and I apologize... this is the open space that we're proposing to dedicate and you can see the trail configuration going through there. It will be, we plan on keeping that open and installing you know a small shelter... just to give it additional. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Yeah, that brings me back to like I said, I really, I'm not one to make a developer, or request a developer to put in a totlot or something but the uniqueness of this location and the fact that I think this will house some growing families, and you know let's bring us a totlot or something like that. Is there a spot for that? Shawn Siders: This spot would certainly be tied with the trail configuration going through it. But we're estimating that the... The reason I guess we all collectively selected to configure that trail there is because we are right next to the Peterson development which they will have a large park incorporated into their site. So I would look, say it would be difficult to incorporate a totlot into this community. You know we do have the park dedication fee that of course we are paying into per unit so I guess that was our rationale with city staff and parks board. We would pay those fees to support the park on the Peterson parcel, and then to do some minor things as the grades allow to enhance the open space on the site. Kate Aanenson: We can look at that between now and final plat because one of the other things that we talked about is, there's an opportunity as that trail comes up and touches the road, maybe you can point to that Shawn. On the trail. Further over. That trail as it comes up. In here. There's opportunities to do some benches and some of those sort of things just to overtake the view and some of those and so we'd be happy to look at that between now and final plat. Incorporation of some of those. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I think I'm done for now 9 City Council Meeting — A• 10, 2006 • Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Other questions? I guess we've gone through them. Just some questions to follow up to some of the issues that were important while we were looking at Liberty at Bluff Creek, and that was parking. You made mention of that with a number of sites. I guess if you could help explain, how dispersed are those extra parking sites? And the ones on the private road, those are actually parking spaces off the road. Now the other issue, I'll just lay a bunch of things out there and you guys can reply. Ms. Aanenson, when we were looking at Liberty at Bluff Creek we talked about the depth of the driveway to ensure that. Kate Aanenson: That's now their standard for depth. We've given them a new standard. Mayor Furlong: We've got a new standard so... Kate Aanenson: We've got a much better project, and certainly with the larger units there's, you've got that larger driveway as opposed to a single and with their garage in the back, those tend to be the ones that need the most guest parking. There is guest parking on the north side, and then down, as Shawn indicated, in the park area there. And I think that's. Mayor Furlong: And that's pretty typical city street, the public street that starts, runs all the way through and up? So it'd be part of the on street parking along there? Kate Aanenson: The public street, correct. Mayor Furlong: It's subject to everyone else's limitation, right? I guess are we counting those parking stalls so the public street is. Kate Aanenson: No, no. That's different than what we did on Liberty. That would be different. When we provided, let them do on street parking because there was again a different product mix in there and trying to get that parking closer to those products that, you wouldn't want to maybe park in the back. You'd want to go park in the front and ring the doorbell so. Mayor Furlong: So we're not counting any of the public streets available parking? Kate Aanenson: No we're not. Mayor Furlong: In the parking count. Okay. Alright. Thank you. And I guess that's all the questions I had. Any other questions for the applicant then? Okay. Very good, thank you. Appreciate it. I guess at this time I would ask if there are any other questions or follow up questions for staff. Councilman Lundquist: Kate can you put up that map of the whole area? The aerial. Kate Aanenson: This colored one? Councilman Lundquist: There you go. So you know what, that AUAR, the black and white one might be, there you go. That one right on top. Yeah. So the existing Liberty at Bluff Creek is 31 0 0 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 right there along Audubon and then the Peterson property is inbetween. And Peterson property, the proposal is to put single family homes. Kate Aanenson: Right... Councilman Lundquist: Homes in there. Then we go back to townhouses. Kate Aanenson: Right, and this looks... Councilman Lundquist: Okay. And then there's Dorsey and Fox's right there. Okay. Okay. So do you like that flow of townhouses, single family back to townhouse? Kate Aanenson: ...so this would be, this is the subject site right here... This is the subject site that we're talking about. So this is the piece, sorry. This is the Fox family parcel piece. This is the trees we're talking about. So tying in, so this is the Peterson and I think Mr. Siders indicated there's a separation between those two projects. And that's where we're working with the topography. Providing those natural separations. Enhancing the wetland down here. And then we've got the wetland, the creek corridor through here. There's a physical separation between those projects. This shows the park on this side right here. Another transition between the medium density to more low density, and the road provides that transition. And then this project, the Preserve which is going to Planning Commission is coming in a little bit smaller single family lot. More a Ryland Homes is proposing that project. Averaging about 8,000 square foot on the lots there so, so the goal was to provide a variety of housing types based on what's happening in the neighborhood. We've got that. Councilman Lundquist: So where's the nearest accessible park from Creekside? Kate Aanenson: From this one? Councilman Lundquist: Yeah. Kate Aanenson: This is the park that's serving the majority of the area. Councilman Lundquist: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Could there be another park somewhere else on the site? Councilman Lundquist: So how do they get there? Do they have to go up to the street and down and back? Kate Aanenson: Well there's a, they would get through this trail that we just talked about. This trail that tied back down to this trail going through. Councilman Lundquist: So is there a trail across the creek then? Kate Aanenson: Well to get onto this one. To get up and then over, right. Or come back down. 32 0 0 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Councilman Lundquist: Right, so you've got to go up to the street and then over and back down again. Kate Aanenson: Yep, yep. Yep. Councilman Lundquist: Okay. Kate Aanenson: And this project will also come in with a small park in there for that development too, but for the neighborhood park, this is the site. Councilman Labatt: Brian, can I piggy back on a question? Kate, help me through this, on Brian's point. How do we connect Longacres to Vasserman Ridge? Where we cross Bluff Creek there. Was there just a culvert there? Was the creek not as wide? You know where the trail goes out to the end of Bent Bow Trail. Kate Aanenson: I don't think there's a culvert. Todd Hoffman: There's a culvert crossing there. An old farm crossing. Councilman Labatt: And nothing like that is doable down here to make it easier where you have the trail going along the perimeter here and then connecting the two with a path similar to. Todd Hoffman: Councilman Labatt, when staff has been anticipating these pedestrian routes for some time and the challenge going from this site to this site is really the grades and the extent of the wetlands that are down here. It's a steep valley to get down and come back up the other side. And so we planned the crossing at the street to allow the two neighborhoods to connect. And then you could go south as well out of the development, and then cross under and come back up this direction if you'd like. So both access to public spaces such as the park, but then also how do people go for walks or a run from that particular development? Their neighborhood and then get around and back into their neighborhood. So we did look at that. In fact we looked at taking the trail that is a part of this, the subdivision you're looking at tonight and taking it across the creek into the natural area to take advantage of those natural spaces other than crossing it again but those creek crossings get very difficult and difficult to manage. The one in Longacres was there in place as a field road and we just took advantage of it and put the trail across and the grades are much lower there. Councilman Lundquist: So if I'm in the middle of, if I'm in the middle of Creekside and I take the trail either way, north or south, how far do I have to walk to get to the park? Todd Hoffman: Approximately half a mile. Todd Gerhardt: Would future owners of these properties have a relationship in using the recreational facilities at Liberty at Bluff Creek development? 33 0 0 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Shawn Siders: Excuse me, thank you Mr. Gerhardt. We had not anticipated that simply because to have a single homeowners association to manage two communities that are physically separated, it's not impossible but it certainly adds a level of complexity that the homeowners aren't traditionally, homeowners and lenders aren't traditionally interested in involving themselves with you know, to say if somebody's a friend of you know there's 2 kids that are friends within each perspective development and you know the Creekside resident goes and takes a swim at Bluff Creek, I don't think that we're going to be checking identification cards that closely to throw them out. At least I won't be. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other questions here? You want to start with comments? Thoughts. Councilman Labatt: Well I think Brian and I have both have concerns here. Maybe Bethany too. With the lack of a park or the lack of a creek crossing. Todd Hoffman. That park over on the Peterson property, the city park there. What amenities is that going to have at it? Todd Hoffman: It's a 4 acre site. It will have a playground, parking lot, half court basketball and an open green field. And then trail connection. Mayor Furlong: This is a neighborhood park. How does our comprehensive plan dictate what area a neighborhood park should serve? I guess that's part of what we're looking at here. What's the service area? Todd Hoffman: Half mile reach. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So in this case it's an up and back down but it's the same as someone being further north and coming straight down. Or with out other neighborhood parks around the city, same type of reach. Todd Gerhardt: ...comparison would be the North Lotus Park. I don't believe there's a totlot in the Near Mountain development. Any individual in that one has got to be pushing 300 units that would be in that development. Everybody's got to come down to Pleasant View to get on the trail and go to the North Lotus Park. Same thing with Fox Hollow. Councilwoman Tjornhom: But I think the difference is, is this is a townhouse development so, I mean you're talking about a neighborhood and a park and I bet every other person has a swing set in their back yard or something like that and I don't think, you know these people aren't going to have the liberty to just put up a Rainbow set in their back yard. Councilman Lundquist: No pun intended. Councilwoman Tjomhom: No pun intended. So I think that's probably the difference that I feel they're a little bit different. Todd Hoffman: I've not studied with the applicant or without the applicant the area that is in that little green space, and perhaps they can revisit that. That's probably the best opportunity. 34 City Council Meeting — A• 10, 2006 • Neighborhood visits, park visits, there are going to be days when people would take that walk but the majority of park visits are much shorter than that and they could just walk down to the end of their block and even on a small playground, socialize with some of their neighbors. Take their children down there. That would be a highly attractive amenity within the neighborhood, so perhaps we should just ask the applicant to relook at that one more time. Councilman Labatt: Kate, how big is that area in that tum around? How big an area are we talking? Kate Aanenson: I don't know if I have that off the top of my head. Shawn Siders: Quarter, maybe a third of an acre. Kate Aanenson: A typical lot size. A standard, a little bit bigger than a standard lot. Kevin Clark: I think just going back to what we've looked at, progressing through the planning of this, we looked at this as a more passive setting with the elevations Kate referred to the opportunity along. One of the things we talked about when we were working with Todd and the parks commission was the trail location. We talked quite a bit about the trail crossings and feasibility of that and I don't really think the graphic is exaggerating but the flood plain down there, the width from bank to bank or how that tributary runs, this would make crossing it very challenging as far as maintenance and also access because of how quickly it drops down and then back up. So this area here, as a retaining wall all along this street, in order to facilitate certainly the street construction, but also to protect this area and this bluff. I guess from a developer's standpoint, the things that we're conscious of and Rob here, our project manager is going to be even more conscious of is just the whole stormwater management piece. I mean it's really concentrated on, if you go back 3 years, how much we've focused on protecting the bluff. How much time we've taken to have setbacks and prime area and secondary, that we've really focused a lot of energy on that, so working through this trail piece was also a compliment to how we saw the site which was more from a viewpoint shed and we talked about benches up on this area here and creating an area, kind of a rest area I guess when you come up off the trail with what we envision was you know a lean-to or gazebo, some kind of effect like that where you come through this kind of a back to setting place where you come and have a picnic or rest in the shade. Things like that. But if the goal to provide a play area in each of these separate kind of communities, I wouldn't say it's something we couldn't look at it commissioner, councilmen. But it was our initial objective to have this be more of a passive area. And maybe if it's an offset between having that be passive and convert that to a small play facility, that's possible too but we're also conscious that we have a full public right-of-way coming into this with circulation around it, and then parking there so while it's I think sufficient size to accommodate some, it's probably not going to be a big grand totlot area but there certainly could be some provisions for that so I think that there's places where we can meet on that. It depends on which side you want to land on heavier. Most passive setting or more an active play space. So it certainly is open. Councilman Labatt: Another question for Todd Hoffman. Todd, the small little park on Stone Creek Circle East, you know up in Stone Creek off of Galpin. Where the little playground is there off the little circle and we've got a Circle East and Circle West. 35 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Todd Hoffman: Stone Creek, yep. Councilman Labatt: How big is that? Todd Hoffman: How big is that park? Councilman Labatt: Yeah. The little totlot play area. Todd Hoffman: Very small. The actual park size with all the creek is about 9 acres, but the totlot area is just. Councilman Labatt: I was just talking the you know as you're coming down the road and take the right hand to go into the cul-de-sac there's a little park right there that seems to adequately service that area of Stone Creek. Todd Hoffman: All of that would fit in here. Councilman Labatt: Thank you. Okay. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other questions or thoughts? We seem to be focusing on park issues. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I'm sorry. Mayor Furlong: Well, that's why we raise questions so. Councilman Labatt, thoughts. Comments. Councilman Labatt: Well I'm going to take the park issue instead of the site real quick. I want to go back to number 48. And like the addition of the wording, but I think prior to final approval the developer must contact the Fox family to coordinate the elevation of the northern street connection at their property line. I can see this dancing back and forth like a ping pong match here. And I think that we need to word it differently where you know who has the final say? If it's Town and Country goes to the Fox's and say well our elevation is 978.4 for example, and Fox says well that ain't going to work for me. I need 981. You know I don't want to get into this match back and forth about who has the final say so somebody's got to have the final say. Whether it's the city or whether it's Town and Country. But I don't think that the Fox should have a veto power or be able to hold Town and Country, hold up their projects so I think we need to fix that verbiage in there. Kate Aanenson: Can I ask the City Attorney if he has some alternate. Roger Knutson: Mayor, I certainly ... no one has, no private citizen can have a veto power over someone else's decisions on how they're developing their property. That's reserved for the council. That's certainly your prerogative. I think the intention here is that they're supposed to coordinate, discuss with the Fox's and try to work something out. Not that they necessarily will kill City Council Meeting — A• 10, 2006 • but they should try in good faith to do that. If they can't reach an agreement, then it comes back for you to make a decision. Todd Gerhardt: I think you could add language to this number here. This recommendation to include that a decision be made prior to final plat and if the decision isn't made by final plat between the two parties, then you know as Roger has said, City Council has the ultimate decision in deciding where exactly that elevation should be. Councilman Lundquist: Well that's the way it's worded right now though. Essentially. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah. Councilman Lundquist: That condition does not connotate or require that an approval has to be made by the Fox property. All it says if they have to contact them. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilman Lundquist: I think we understand the intentions but right now the way it's worded is, I mean you know, if they can't come back with an agreement, it's up to us anyway. Todd Gerhardt: That's correct. Kate Aanenson: And I just want to make clear for the record, this got put in there based on our meeting, the City Engineer and myself today and we want to have good faith that we're trying to work together on this so that's why it was put in there. That we're trying to work to get the best location, if it can be resolved. Anticipating what the future development plans would be. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Okay? Let's keep it moving. In terms of overall thoughts for the development. Councilman Lundquist. Councilman Lundquist: I guess a couple of concerns that I have. One is the park. The problem is, what I struggle with is I don't think I have a good solution because I'm not a fan of private totlots. Try to avoid them like the plague, but I think it's not the greatest set up. If I'm a young family trying to get into Chanhassen and I want to come in and buy a $230,000 townhome, I don't know that I want to send my kids up a trail to a major collector street, across the creek there, and then back across somewhere. I mean I understand, absolutely understand that crossing that creek and all the slopes and that stuff is not practical and wouldn't encourage that so I guess that's what I struggle with. It's a long ways to that park and so that's a problem. But I, you know there's an issue there that I think we need to figure out and we need to solve because we've got to provide an amenity somehow because there's going to be kids in that neighborhood and I think it's just, in my opinion, too far to go to send them over to that proposed park. The route that it has to go. So that's a concern. Other concern is that, I guess I never envisioned when we looked at this that we're going to have, I mean we're talking about, what have we got? 600 units. How many units do we got in the Liberty at Bluff Creek Kate? 400? Kate Aanenson: 444. 37 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Councilman Lundquist: Okay, so we've got you know 600 townhouses located right there. It's a lot of townhouses in an area. Understand land prices are what they are. We've got a major highway going through there. Nobody's going to want to build a million and a half dollar house on that, and you couldn't afford to anyway with the price of land, so understand there's some challenges there. I'm just trying to get my arms around having 600 townhouses in that area. And then the other thing with the road connection to the Fox property is, I guess I would like to see, I know that Mr. Fox and Mr. Dorsey have some proposals and other things. I guess I would just like to see if there's a way to look at some of the preliminaries and see if it even matches up at all. I understand their's may be a long ways off and not suggesting that we hold Town and Country hostage for another person's development but I would like to see just some you know, are we even in the ballpark for elevations. For locations. For I mean if they have a proposal that says it's here and these guys are over here, and we're a quarter mile apart, I mean that's something that maybe we can look at. I'm not saying that that means that we're going to say no to Town and Country or whatever. You know he who gets there first I guess wins ultimately generally, but I'd just like to see that and take a look at it and see if we're even in the ballpark there. On that, and I guess so those are the biggest things I have now. You know overall I'm glad that the developer kind of learned from the previous grueling process on Liberty at Bluff Creek to incorporate that architecture and those things. I mean that makes the process a lot smoother and that so I'm glad to see that. I think that's definitely a positive. Another, I don't want to start from scratch on this thing necessarily but I guess I'd like, I would have liked to have seen something other than the four types of units that we had over there just again as a mix. I understand we're doing some things with the architecture and colors and things but, and you know creating something from scratch obviously is not in their portfolios as a challenge but you know whether or not that ultimately makes a difference to me, I guess I haven't decided yet. But overall I think there's enough things to be done here with some things I'd like to look at that I'm not sure I'm ready to proceed tonight and might suggest that we wait a couple of weeks to look at some of the alternatives. Check out some of the things with where it meets up and see if there's any other suggestions and things that we can look at with the park access or something like that, that would go that way so that's just my thoughts. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Well for once I'm not opposed to it. Primarily because we don't have to change the rezoning. I think for me that was, that's a big deal. That we're not you know having to find a new replacement for industrial, office industrial somewhere else. This was kind of you know planned as always to be medium density, am I correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Good, good. So I'm not off on that. But I think I was hoping for more variety. I'm not against townhouses. I'm not against the development at all. I just would like to see development that doesn't mirror the last development. You know it's, I don't know if I drive into one development, then I go to the next one, I think I'd kind of feel like well, where am I? Am I at Creekside or am I at Bluff Creek? I can't tell the difference, and so I just think we probably need to push a little bit more on the architecture and the variety of the design of this U-1 City Council Meeting — A• 10, 2006 • development. And I also feel with the road issue, I really want to be fair to the Fox's on all of this because even though Town and Country is there first, you know they still have a lot at stake also so I want to make sure that we really look through everything with a fine tooth comb. Go over all the options and make sure we can come up with something that is okay with the city, with the Fox's and with Town and Country so we all feel good about it, if it's possible. I think you need to at least keep trying with that. And so I too am not ready to approve it but that's not saying that I'm going to not approve it in the future once some of these details get ironed out. And the park I guess since I'm the one that brought it up. But I just feel that we should probably investigate that a little bit more. Mayor Furlong: Thanks. Councilman Labatt. Councilman Labatt: How far are we on our time Kate? Mayor Furlong: May something I thought I saw. Roger Knutson: May 8a'. Councilman Labatt: So do we have one more meeting or two? Councilman Lundquist: One more. Councilman Labatt: Well I guess that you know, the first thing we've got to look at is, it was talked about earlier. I don't disagree with either one of you two on your comments and barring a little bit more time here trying to work a couple of these things out and that's the way we're all leaning here tonight. I think it's a good project. Number one I think that you look at the net density of 4.7 units per acre when it's guided for 8, and we have open space and bluffs to worry about and they've protected them. I think they heard our comments about the park and we need to investigate putting some sort of park on that island in the cul-de-sac at the end. You know I had private parks in my neighborhoods in Chanhassen here and in city parks so I go back and forth. I'm not going to write off a private park there. The architecture on the back of the buildings was talked about. How do you break it up a little bit? I'm not sure. I know we talked about it earlier Bethany and where you incorporate different siding or the colors in the recessed areas are nice but somehow we've just kind of got to break that up so, I hope in the next 2 weeks here, or 4 weeks or whatever it's going to come back to the developable, look at our suggestions tonight and make some tweaks if they can. Overall I think it's a good project for our future residents. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. You know my thoughts are similar to those expressed I guess in terms of starting general. I think overall this process has been easier because of the work that we've done mutually over the last few months and years, especially starting with Liberty at Bluff Creek. To that end I think that while there's some expression here of things that have been desired, I also appreciate that generally the opinions have been there. It's a good project and it sounds like we're close but we need to do a little bit more and that's what I'm hearing tonight and I think, I appreciate the comments Mr. Siders and Mr. Clark made that suggested that they're willing to look at some of these things so I appreciate their willingness to do that. The park City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 amenities, you know understand the issues there that have been expressed tonight. Let's see what you can come back with because we're not looking for a second neighborhood park on this site. I don't think anybody's, so it's not that we're looking for there, and I know that there might be some things to do and still provide perhaps a combination of the passive and the small recreation, at least for small children which I think was expressed earlier this evening. The number of units, I think Councilman Labatt raised up the density issue and it's a lot of units across this area but I think in part, at least in this case, a lot of the units, you know from a density standpoint, but we're also working with and maintaining in terms of the density and the proximity of the units is the Bluff Creek corridor that runs through the middle of this entire AUAR area and because of that, while the units are there, they're being pushed together if you will from a density standpoint. The, so I think it's something that we're getting our arms around. I agree with you on that. I think a little more time to just make sure we're comfortable with that. Wouldn't hurt since it looks like there's some other things to look at as well. The street connection, we talked a little bit about that. That was addressed well I think at the Planning Commission. Those issues were raised during the public hearing and the first question we have to ask ourselves as a city is, do we want one or more access points to a neighborhood and I think clearly the answer is more than one is what we want from a safety standpoint. For flow of traffic that's necessary so then what are the viable alternatives? I think the options raised ... make it the best alternative. I'm pleased to see the expansion of condition number 48 to include the property owners to the north. I think that's important. That was mentioned tonight a few times on other items and we need to do that and look for ways that we can accommodate their needs. At the same time we have tried and I know it's been mentioned before but we've tried to allow property owners to set the pace of development in this area rather than forcing development, so I wouldn't want this street connection to force the timing of the development, nor would I, so that there's agreement there on the property to the north. Nor would I want this development to be held up until the other property owners are ready but working together in good faith to try to find a solution I think is something that is important. That, as I understand it does not have to be completed in the next two weeks... Kate Aanenson: Thank you. That's the plans because that's why we put in the motion at the time of final plat because that may be a month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months out and. Mayor Furlong: Whatever that timing is. That's not something that we're expecting them to meet in the next 2 weeks to come up with... Kate Aanenson: That was going to be the concern I would raise. Councilman Lundquist: To clarify I would like to see how the concepts match up. I'm not saying it has to be set in stone in 2 weeks when it comes back. Understand. I'm just, right now I don't have a clue what this stuff to the north looks like and if we're even within a half a mile of each other of, you know understand there's a lot of things and so just show me a picture. Mayor Furlong: And I think that's fair and I appreciate you clarifying because we want to make sure that we've got something that's manageable within the timeframe here so, but it is an important part. I think we need multiple connections to this neighborhood. The north is the obvious, best solution to meet that need and what we want to do is give consideration to the El r i City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Property owner to the north and what their desires are so, so getting more information on that is appropriate. And with regard to the architectural standards, I think we didn't have a lot of talk on that tonight. Councilwoman Tjomhom, you brought that up in large part because of the effort we put in on Liberty at Bluff Creek and so, you know we view these that the last was the minimum standard. The last project was the minimum standards so how can we do better at things that I think this council and even I can see with this applicant have been working towards so we can look at that. So I guess at this point, given those comments, it's clear to me that taking a few more weeks to work together to try to address some of these issues to see what we can makes some sense. I want to make sure that the staff and the applicant have everything we're looking for given the timeframe and out of fairness to them so is there anything that somebody hasn't mentioned that they're interested in commenting on? Whether it's the wording of some of the conditions. You know there's a lot of things that we could go back and try to fix and tweak but as well as spend some time on these particular 4 or 5 areas that we talked about. Councilman Lundquist: Do you feel like you have some... Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Mayor Furlong: Sufficient direction. Mr. Clark, you had a question or comment? Kevin Clark: Certainly want to have the opportunity to go and look at these things. I just want to shape the discussion moving forward in regards to the connection, and I think by default what we've already talked about is in regards to creek crossings or north, south, east, west. We've kind of shaped the location so while I know it wasn't facetious, there's certainly not ... and I guess what I want to do is show just to shape the argument coming forward is, the area where the street is going through is, we're coming off of this high area down to this low area so already this road is maintaining a grade that's existing and we're working to stay away from the Bluff Creek wooded area so, the area we're talking about, well I'm not quite sure because we haven't had this discussion with the Fox's or their representative. I'm not sure, there isn't a lot of wiggle room one way or the other because we either go into the area that MnDot's trying to preserve in additional wetland for the road construction, or if we go the other direction we're into the trees and into the grading the street up into the grade so I think it's more of just an elevation place, and some of those things are more predicated on just what's the right storm water layout and that's really where we would let our engineers talk through that. And I don't know from our timing, certainly we're working through this, we'd be prepared you know moving forward to have our engineering done. I'm not sure that's really where the Fox's would be with their plans as far as any, I mean they don't even have a, they're not, and that's nothing against them but from a concept, you know what the use is and how that might work, I think what we would be doing is we would certainly communicate to them where we, from an engineering standpoint, where it makes sense to put that road and then maybe it's a matter of a half a foot. Councilman Lundquist: Well and I don't, I don't disagree Mr. Clark with anything you said but the key point for me in what you just did say is we haven't had that discussion yet, and that's the key point for me is, is I mean you know I agree that there isn't probably a lot of options there. You know you're working with the highway on one side, the bluff and trees on one side and you know monster wetland that we're going to try to skirt the edge of or something, so I wouldn't be 41 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 shocked if it came back in exactly the same location. But the, I wouldn't be shocked if it was somewhere else either I guess but, I think the key point for me is that, when you said we haven't had that discussion yet. That's the piece that I want to see to occur before we come back in a couple weeks. Kevin Clark: Understood, and not to be argumentative but I'm not sure they have an engineering plan for me to match up to... Councilman Lundquist: And it may be just a concept plan, that's fine. So we'll work with the information that we have and we'll go from there. That's all we can do. And another key point, clarification again is, it's not my intention to hold back your project based on whether or not they have engineering level drawings yet or not. It's you know, I just want to see, I want to see how the color pens match up on the paper is all at this point. Kevin Clark: Understood. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Anything else at this point or questions or clarification or. Kate Aanenson: I've got it. Mayor Furlong: You've got it? Kate Aanenson: I've got it. Direction. Mayor Furlong: I'm glad somebody has it. Very good. Is there any other discussion? If not, is there a motion to table? Councilman Lundquist: I would move that we table item 5 for further clarification and some more details. Mayor Furlong: Thank you, is there a second? Councilman Labatt: Second. Mayor Furlong: Motion's been made to table and seconded. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilman Labatt seconded that the City Council table Planning Case #05-24, Liberty at Creekside for further clarification and details. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK. LOT 2. BLOCK 2 CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK, APPLICANT EDEN TRACE CORPORATION: REQUEST FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR REDUCED PARKING SETBACK AT THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR AN OFFICEIWAREHOUSE BUILDING. 42 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DATE: March 21, 2006 CC DATE: April 10, 2006 REVIEW DEADLINE: June 30, 2006 CASE #: 05-24 BY: AF, RG, LH, ML, JS, ST T PROPOSAL: Request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision of approximately 36.01 acres into 99 37 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District — LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE. LOCATION: East of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 (1500 Pioneer Trail) APPLICANT: Town & Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (952)944-3455 PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District, A2 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential — Medium Density (net density range 4.0 — 8.0 units/acre) ACREAGE: 36.01 gross acres 30.09 net acres DENSITY: 4.05 units/acre gross; 4.78 units/acre net SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a rezoning to PUD, subdivision and site plan approval to build 146 town homes with a conditional use permit for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District as well as grading within the floodplain. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUD's, and amendments to PUD's because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi judicial decision. 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227,1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952 227.11 BO Fax: 952 227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning B Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site wwx.ci.chanhassen.mn.us `k 7T01 IT fflu I TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: April 24, 2006 � (> SUBJ: Liberty at Creekside v — Planning Case #05-24 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item was tabled at the April 10, 2006 City Council meeting. ACTION REQUIRED City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. DISCUSSION Below is a breakdown of the residential land uses and the number of housing units approved under the AUAR: Property Net # units units/acres De ler, Dean 40.0 n/a — Gayle 30.0 240.0 W.0 —Degler Dorsey 30.0 240.0 8.0 Fox, Jeff 21.0 168.0 8.0 Fox Family 38.0 304.0 8.0 Town Country #2 30.0 135.0 4.5 Town Country #1 79.0 450.0 5.7 Peterson, Sever 42.0 120.0 2.9 Park 20.0 n/a Laurent 17.0 n/a 347.0 1,657.0 6.4 AUAR Assumption 350 1,584 The City of Chanhassen • A growing communitypth clean lakes, quality schools, a chamling downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Liberty at Creekside April 24, 2006 Page 2 The next table is a summary of the developments in the 2005 MUSA that have recently been approved. Development Gross Acres Net Acres Net Density Total units Liberty on Bluff Creek 91.02 39.51 11.24 444 (Town & Count #1) Liberty at Creekside 36.01 13.54 10.64 146 (Town & Country #2) Pioneer Pass (Sever 120 28.11 2.88 81 Peterson) The Preserve (Gayle 80 31.33 4.55 155 De ler) Total 112.49 Avg. 7.34 Total 826 Based on the AUAR there is an additional potential 758 housing units available. The applicant has included a sketch plan and picture of the play equipment for the open space bordered by private streets D and E. They will be providing addition information at the City Council meeting. The applicant has prepared a narrative regarding the evolution of the architecture for the proposed housing units. The development consists of two housing types: 4 and 6 -unit Premiers and 6 -unit Concords. Within each housing type are four alternative living configurations. A color and material pallet will be established for each of the 29 buildings. Our evaluation of the appearance of the project has been based on the quality of its design in relationship to its surroundings including building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback, orientation and site topography and amenities (trees, wetlands, creeks and open space). The applicant has also contacted the Fox family to discuss the elevation of the street connection exiting the site to the north as well as provided the Fox family with engineering data regarding the proposed development. Attached is a Land Use Concept Plan for the Fox -Dorsey Properties. Staff has added arrows showing the potential extension of the road from the south across the Fox property. As can be seen in the drawing, there is a full range of alternatives for this street connection. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the four motions approving the project as specified on pages 17 - 23 in the staff report dated March 21, 2006. ATTACHMENTS 1. 2005 Open Space, Trails and Development Areas 2. Letter from Shawn Siders to Mayor and City Council dated April 18, 2006. 3. Liberty at Creekside Open SpacelGathering Spot Sketch Plan. 4. Liberty at Creekside Play Equipment 5. Reduced Copy Land Use Concept Plan Fox — Dorsey Properties. 6. Memo from Bob Generous to Todd Gerhardt dated April 10, 2006. gApIan\2005 planning c X05-24 liberty at cn ksidetexecu6ve sumnmy24m TOWN & April 18, 2006 Mayor and City Council City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Dear Mayor and City Council: _M11-- COUNTRY HOMES a K Havoc a Compwy Thank you for the opportunity to provide additional information regarding the Liberty at Creek Side development following our discussion on April 10, 2006. During that discussion, Town & Country Homes was encouraged to discuss the secondary road access through the MnDOT property with Jeff Fox, representing the Fox Family Property. Since that meeting, we have had the opportunity to discuss the secondary access with Mr. Fox via telephone conversations and Westwood Professional Services has forwarded the Liberty at Creek Side development plans to his representatives. We look forward to meeting with Mr. Fox and his representatives and will work with city staff to identify the final alignment and elevation of the secondary access through the MnDOT property. It is our understanding that a proposed condition of the preliminary plat approval stipulates that this matter must be resolved prior to submitting the final plat application and Town & Country Homes is prepared to address that challenge during the development of the final plat. We have also identified an appropriate playground structure that can be installed in the cul-de- sac surrounded by private street "D." The proposed playground structure is an appropriate size for the area and is designed for children ages 5-12. The playground will be situated in the middle of the cul-de-sac area to minimize the opportunity for pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. The attached picture illustrates the proposed playground for the area. During the design of the Liberty at Creek Side community, the Premier and Concord collections were selected for this neighborhood because they offer the opportunity to better utilize the existing topography on the site. Because of their design features, we have been able to preserve additional open space within the neighborhood while offering views of the upgraded open areas to each homesite. As we discussed at the April 10, 2006 meeting, Town & Country Homes has included an additional color scheme that will only be available at the Liberty at Creek Side development. We propose that three color schemes be dedicated to the Premier units and three color schemes be dedicated to the Concord units. In addition to the varied color schemes, an appropriate brick or stone accent has been selected for each color pattern further distinguishing our color palette. 0 wa m 7615 Smetana lane, Suite 180 - Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • Phone 952-944-3455 • Fax 952-944 3437 • www.townandcountryhomesmn.com Minnesota Builder #20539403 & #20543466 City of Chanhassen Liberty at Creek Side April 18, 2006 Page 2 The Liberty on Bluff Creek and Liberty at Creek Side communities offer enhanced architectural features that are not standard within other communities. For example, we have introduced three elevations to the Premier Collection. The Victorian, Farmhouse and Mission elevations will be incorporated throughout both neighborhoods. By introducing three distinct elevations as well as the proposed color schemes for the Premier product line, we are able to ensure that the perimeter streetscape of the Liberty at Creek Side community varies as vehicles and pedestrians traverse the neighborhood. Town & Country Homes has also upgraded the architectural treatments to the Concord product line. We have introduced an assortment of exterior variations such as varied gables and porch roofs. Further, we have also introduced a variety of exterior building materials such as split face rock, brick, siding and shakes. While planning for this community, we reviewed a number of housing products that ranged in size and density. The Premier and Concord product lines allow Town & Country Homes to create an exclusive community that offers a stunning site design, enhanced architectural features, provides the necessary infrastructure, allows us to partner with the city to upgrade Lyman Avenue while creating housing opportunities that are affordable to a larger segment of the Chanhassen community. We are proud of the efforts by all parties involved to make this community successful and we stand behind the proposed plans that will ensure that this community is a success for the city of Chanhassen and Town & Country Homes. Thank you for your continued support of the Liberty at Creek Side development and we look forward to your approval on April 24, 2006. We are pleased to work with the city of Chanhassen to address these outstanding items and we are prepared to discuss these with you in greater detail. Very truly yours, Shawn Siders Community Planning Manager Enclosure cc: Kevin Clark, Vice President of Land Development Rick Janssen, Vice President of Land Acquisition Liberty at Creek Side Proposed Playground Equipment and Site Amenities atcn&lik ... OW Za...aCo."amra nn „......,.. Liberty at Creek Side - Proposed Playground System 2 - 6' steel benches adjacent to 1— 22 gallon trash receptacle adjacent to playground equipment playground equipment Pb JNTRY HOMES __ _. /i a A Ilommnwa• Ca•panY Tot Lot Enlargement Fmi L r -7qj I .40 �I 0 MEMORANDUM Phone: 952227.1180 TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager MYl OF FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner CHOWSEN into 29 lots, 3 outlots, and public right-of-way; site plan approval for 146 Fax: 952.227.1170 townhouses consisting of 98 Premier units and 48 Concord units; and conditional DATE: April 10, 2006 77DO Market Boulevard Creek Overlay District. Fax: 952.227.1110 PO Box 147 SUBJ: Liberty at Creekside Chanhassen, MN 55317 Planning Case #05-24 Administration Phone 952.227.1100 Fax:952.227,1110 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Building Inspections The developer is requesting the rezoning of property from Agricultural Estate Phone: 952227.1180 District, A-2, to Planned Unit Development — Residential, PUD -R, to permit a 146- Fax 952227.1190 unit townhouse development on land guided residential — medium density (net Engineering density range 4.0 — 8.0 units per acre); a subdivision of approximately 36.01 acres Phone: 952.227.1160 into 29 lots, 3 outlots, and public right-of-way; site plan approval for 146 Fax: 952.227.1170 townhouses consisting of 98 Premier units and 48 Concord units; and conditional Finance use permits for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Phone: 952.227.1140 Creek Overlay District. Fax: 952.227.1110 alignment due to the impacts to the trees within the Fox property and the steep Park ARecreation ACTION REQUIRED Phone. 952.2271120 Staff and the developer examined two other alignments for the second access to the Fax 9522271110 City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. Recreation Center of the Alternate Urban Areawide Review, the City's goal was to limit the creek 2310 Coulter Boulevard crossing to one. Extending the street west through the Fox property from the Phone: 952.227.1400 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1404 would require encroachment into a wooded area that is required to be preserved as Planning & The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 21, 2006, to review the Natural Resources proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to approve the Phone: 952.227.1130 proposed project. The Planning Commission minutes are item la of the April 10, Fax: 952227.1110 2006 City Council packet. Public Works 1591 Park Road As part of the discussion, two issues were brought out: diversity and uniqueness of Phone: 952.221.1300 the development and road access. Attached is a letter from the applicant addressing Fax: 952.227.1310 the diversity issue. Senior Center Phone: 952 227.1125 Staff and the developer examined two other alignments for the second access to the Fax: 9522271110 site. A southerly extension to Pioneer Trail would require a creek crossing. As part Web site of the Alternate Urban Areawide Review, the City's goal was to limit the creek wwwci.chanhassen mn.us crossing to one. Extending the street west through the Fox property from the proposed northern connection shown on the plan and looping back to "Street A" would require encroachment into a wooded area that is required to be preserved as part of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone. Staff did not support this alignment due to the impacts to the trees within the Fox property and the steep slopes on the east side of "Street A". 5 The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. Liberty at Creekside April 10, 2006 Page 2 The Fox and Dorsey families were concerned with the proposed traffic volumes that would use the northern connection that would ultimately extend north through the Fox property. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual, 6's Edition, 1998, the proposed townhome development would generate 856 trips daily, 64 trips during the morning peak and 79 trips during the evening peak. This traffic volume is similar to that of Longacres Drive east of Highway 41, assuming all trips generated from Liberty at Creekside use the northern access. According to the 81° Edition of the Civil Engineering Reference Manual by Michael R. Lindeberg, streets with 2,000 vehicles per day or less are classified as local streets. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the four motions approving the project as specified on pages 17 - 23 in the staff report dated March 21, 2006. ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter from Shawn Siders to Mayor and City Council dated March 29, 2006. 2. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 21, 2006. gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-24 liberty at c=kside\executive summaryAcc Mir_ TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES March 29, 2006 i K 11 r ' cc,pmy Mayor and City Council City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Dear Mayor and City Council: Thank you for the opportunity to provide additional information regarding the Liberty at Creek Side development to the Chanhassen City Council for preliminary plat approval on April 10, 2006. As we discussed with the Planning Commission on March 21, 2006, Liberty at Creek Side is a unique community that offers many enhancements to the on-site natural features, the building layout that preserves open space, offers views of the open space to each home site through the terracing of the site and the housing mix to offer additional life cycle housing opportunities to the current and future residents of Chanhassen. Specifically, Town & Country Homes and the city of Chanhassen have partnered to create a community that is "tucked" into this natural setting surrounded on three sides by the Bluff Creek Overlay District while providing the necessary access to ensure the health, safety and welfare of our residents. Additionally, we have worked with the city to enhance the natural features in the southern section of the neighborhood by creating a wetland mitigation area and re -vegetation plan for the farmed area to enhance the open space. This area will be enjoyed by the future residents in this community, the residents that take advantage of the trail network that is proposed to be constructed with the development of this neighborhood and the community at large who will be able to view this preserved area as they drive by on the new transportation network. By preserving and enhancing the natural setting of this community, we will truly create an "amazing space" that will distinguish this community from others in the area. In addition to our efforts to preserve the open space within this community, Town & Country Homes has introduced two housing types, rather than the one originally proposed, to offer additional life cycle housing opportunities for the current and future residents of Chanhassen. We propose the development of our traditional townhome (Premier Collection) around the perimeter of our community because we are able to take advantage of the natural grades with this home which has helped to reduce the height of the on-site retaining walls. We also propose the development of our urban rowhome (Concord Collection) in the interior of the site to provide an additional housing style to create an attractive street environment and meet the current and future needs of the residents of Chanhassen. 121 7615 Smetana lane, Suite 180 • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • Phone 952-944-3455 • Fax 952-944-3437 • www townandcountryhomesmn com Minnesota Budder #20539403 6 #20543466 City of Chanhassen Liberty at Creek Side March 29, 2006 Page 2 During our discussion with the Planning Commission, we were challenged to further enhance our community with minor adjustments to our color selection. We understand that challenge and embrace this opportunity to work with our color collection to improve the Liberty at Creek Side community. We propose the introduction of a sixth color scheme to this community. Further, we propose that three of those color schemes be dedicated to the Premier collection and the other three dedicated to the Concord collection. By creating this distinction within our color palette, we are able to truly distinguish this community from our neighboring communities which consists of five color schemes. In addition to the color collection modifications, we have also introduced varying color treatments to the rear of the Premier collection. As we originally presented this collection to the city, we proposed the use of a single color on the rear of these units. We understand the need to "break up" the monotony of a single color and we will introduce a second color in the middle units of the Premier collection to distinguish these units from those in our other communities. To highlight how these modifications have been incorporated, I am enclosing a rendering of the rear elevation of the Premier units. We are proud to offer these adjustments to the plans to facilitate the approval of the Liberty at Creek Side community. We support the conditions of the Planning Commission and have addressed that challenge to ensure that Liberty at Creek Side is a distinct community that will be a proud home to the current and future residents of Chanhassen. We look forward to the approval of the Liberty at Creek Side plans. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-253-0460. Very truly yours, Shawn Siders Community Planning Manager Enclosure cc: Kevin Clark, Vice President of Land Development 77> Liberty on (BCuff Creek 0 PRODUCT Concord Collection The Concord product line offers four housing types. *Model A offers 2 and 3 bedroom options with up to 21h bathrooms. This floor plan offers between 1,881-2,341 finished square feet with a 2 -car, rear - loaded garage. *Model B offers 2 and 3 bedroom options with up to 21h bathrooms. This floor plan offers between 1,675-1,866 finished square feet with a 2 -car, rear - loaded garage. *Model C offers the master bedroom on the main floor with 2 and 3 bedroom options and up to 31h bathrooms. This floor plan offers between 1,878-2,365 finished square feet with a 2 -car, rear -loaded garage. •Model E offers the master bedroom on the main level with 2 and 3 bedroom options and up to 31h bathrooms. This floor plan offers between 1,922-2,363 finished square feet with a 2 -car, rear -loaded garage. SCANNED � � ; (��\\\ $ ,- 4 4 mm} - \\%Ky\> \ ! Z ; , �/ §k R@ nR§wmA! `\§£\! PRODUCT Premier Collection The Premier product line offers four housing types each with three levels of living area. *Model A offers 2 and 3 bedroom options with up to 2 ih bathrooms. This floor plan offers between 1,550-1,600 finished square feet with a 2 -car, front -loaded garage. *Model C offers 2 and 3 bedroom options with up to 21h bathrooms. This floor plan offers 1,795 finished square feet with a 2 -car, front -loaded garage. *Model D offers 2 and 3 bedroom options with up to 21h bathrooms. This floor plan offers 1,774 finished square feet with a 2 -car, front -loaded garage. *Model F offers 2 and 3 bedroom options with up to 21h bathrooms. This floor plan offers 1,702 finished square feet with a 2 -car, front -loaded garage. PLEASE PRINT CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Planning Case No. 0!5 _a q CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUN 17 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DW Ap licant Na a and Address: Owner Name and Address: nNov t - I y.± i sn� s'ljrMWI o G 3 Contact:_Km.5 i Nev Ac Contact: Phone:gSZ-'1;3-U414 Fax:RSZ -94'i-34SS' Phone: Fax: Email: Ilcv n [K@ rDwrfan cl roan .LcmZnxn, Email: cenr Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit _ Planned Unit Development' So Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review K Site Plan Review' IZtC (500+ S' 142) Subdivision' Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment X Notification Sign" - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost"' - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE I X An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. ' Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNO PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: LEGAL DES, tPf oy-wer-Trait TOTAL ACREAGE: 3D• 2(p fi WETLANDS PRESENT: PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE C • ifl117i11//a1I WdGILIMM iFAKWiw7r-Alrl , I F REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: J'� (tQ This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that 1 am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owners Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. A L- mh�-Aj 017/D15- Si natu a of Ap nt V Date Signature of Fee Owner GAplanWoms0evelopment Review Applicatiion.DOC Date Rev. 4/05 SCANNED TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES a K Hovnauar� Company January 9, 2006 Mr. Bob Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creekside Dear Mr. Generous: RECEIVED JAN 11 2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN As a follow up to our recent conversation, I am sending this letter requesting an extension for preliminary plat review for the Liberty at Creekside project. Town & Country Homes submitted those plans on June 17, 2005. By copy of this letter, I would request that you consider an extension of the city review period of the preliminary plat for an additional 63 days from February 3, 2006 to May 8, 2006. Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-253-0460. Very truly ours, hawn Siders Community Planning Manager Town & Country Homes a. K. Hovnanian Company cc: Kevin Clark, Vice President of Land Development 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • Phone 952-944-3455 • Fax 952-944-3437 • w .townandcountryhomesmn.com Minnesota Builder #20539403 & #20543466 E e R: 8Y8ua81SRas wq;R R3RRYRY RR 6E i HIM R IN ,p ; YI'ACOt M.Y.SOaWM 8 w y o g ,AIII a.AA • f ug I V 1 / IIr' 1 YI'ACOt M.Y.SOaWM 8 4�� sir ,AIII a.AA • f YI'ACOt M.Y.SOaWM 8 �e i \\ � I I L I NI, , \ o \ UU O W OT V I \ 1 �Y. � ROA I I 1 \ b . hi 14 I I / i }1 I tI I{i F 1 i Revised Preliminary Plat Submission for: at 1101 ww DIU= CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED Submitted By JUN 17 2005 -- CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES a K. Hovnaman� Company Liberty at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Community Name Liberty at Creekside Legal Description Legal Description NW 1/4 NW 1/4 26 -116 -23 -TRACT A ALSO COMM AT SW CORN 23-116-23 TH N ON SECT LINE 30' TH IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A PT ON S SECT LINE OF SECTION 30'E OF Section: 23 Township: 116 Range: 023 Liherh-at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Contact Information LANDOWNER NDI Minnesota, LLC C/O Hovstone Properties MN, LLC 7516 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Krista Novack ph. (952) 253-0448 fax (952) 944-3437 DEVELOPER/APPLICANT Town and Country Homes — a K. Hovnanian Company 7516 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Krista Novack ph. (952) 253-0448 fax (952) 944-3437 SITE PLANNING, ENGINEERING Westwood Professional Services 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Chris Moerhl ph.(952) 906-7443 fax (952) 937-5822 Planning PUD Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Total Gross Acreage: - Slopes: - Existing Wetlands: - Mitigated Wetlands: Total Net Acreage: ROW: Oulots: Total Homes: A-2, Agricultural Preservation PUD/Medium Density Residential 36.01 Acres 1.47 Acres 0.90 Acres 2.77 Acres 30.87 Acres 3.55 Acres 0.43 Acres 138 Homes (Premier Collection) Gross Density: 3.83 Homes per AC Net Density: 4.47 Homes per AC ('Medium Density Residential allows for 8 Homes per AC Maximum Net Density) Liberty at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Street, Roadways & Drives: Public Street (Including Parking on One Side) Private Streets Private Drives Setbacks (Minimums): Public ROW Private Street Private Drive Abutting Property Wetland Buffer Building to Building 20ft. 32ft. B -B; 60ft. ROW 32ft. B -B 20ft. & 25ft. B -B 25ft. w/walk, 15ft.w/out walk 25ft. back of curb 20ft. back to curb 50ft. 40ft. Liberty at Creekside is currently zoned Agricultural and guided for Medium Density Residential. Town and Country Homes is proposing a PUD/Medium Density Residential community for Liberty at Creekside. This enables us to be creative with our site layout and design, and allows for more opportunity for preservation, community character, and density clustering. The site planning for Liberty at Creekside has taken into consideration the Bluff Creek Overlay District boundary lines and buffering requirements, as well as the information deriving from the AUAR conducted for the 2005 MUSA Expansion Area. Access is a difficult obstacle in planning this community. We are proposing road access at the NW corner of the site just south of a slope area. We feel that this is the least obtrusive option in providing street access to the community from the major collector road planned for the area. Another difficulty with this site is the topography. Basement products and creative street layouts help us to work with the steep slopes. We have gone through a number of various concepts for this site and are confident that we have shaped a plan that uses the site's natural features to its advantage. Architecture Liberty at Creekside will feature our Premier Collection, which is our basement style townhome. Base Price: Sq. Footage: Mid 200's 1400-1800s.f. Number of Homes: 142 Highlights: Libem- at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 - Provides a plan with the Master on the Main Floor - Walk -Out Basements - Bright and Filled with Windows Style: Scenic, Cozy, Relaxed, Luxurious, and Private Community Placement: Takes advantage of Preservation/Steep Slope areas in the community by bringing the focus to the back of the homes with balconies and walkout basements. This Collection also boasts a more Natural Setting and provides yet another housing style for the life cycles within the "Liberty" communities and Chanhassen. Market: Empty Nesters, Move -Up Townhome Buyers, and Families. Since Town & Country Homes first proposed the Premier homes for Liberty on Bluff Creek (which is the larger site to the West along Audubon), we have upgraded the look of the homes to integrate an even more traditional flare, and to customize the homes special for the City of Chanhassen. Quality of Life Woodlands, ponds, wetlands and the highly regarded Bluff Creek Overlay district surround Liberty at Creekside. In planning this community, our best efforts were focused on preserving as much of the site's natural integrity as possible. Product selection and layout plays an enormous role in optimizing all the site has to offer. Site walks and discussion with city staff has lead us to the attractive Liberty at Creekside plan we have today. The "Liberty" communities will truly offer something special to homebuyers by surpassing normal levels of green space preservation, outdoor activity possibilities, and desirable locations. Homeowners Association: Lihem at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 A Homeowners Association will maintain all common areas, private streets, and amenities - including the community pool. Town & Country Homes is proficient and experienced in HOA creation and management. We take pride in the management companies we hire and expect a high level of standards and performance. This guarantees that the community will be meticulously maintained, and will retain a high value for years to come. Noteworthy News: Very recently, a well-known and successful national homebuilder just entering into the Minnesota market place, K. Hovnanian, has acquired Town & Country Homes. This is an exciting turning point for Town & Country Homes because we will now be backed with even more ability to venture into unique and innovative opportunities. K. Hovnanian is a publicly held company, yet still maintains strong family values and ownership, which was important to Town & Country Homes and the Ryan family. Town & Country Homes will keep its name, and current office location. We look forward to expanding on our success in the homebuilding community. To learn more about K. Hovnanian, visit their website at www.khov.com. .i Famik- OF BLuldcrs Liherh- at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 m" N\ H Ll Lml 4 N CARVER ?4- 4%1%9 Ca,.` 219 East Frontage Road 1946 4 Waconia, MN 55387 &- WATER oo Phone: 952-442-5101 �nty 5`O Fax: 952-442-5497 CONSERVATION DISTRICT hftwJ/ wwsa.easver.m .vs/SWCD/SWCD m in.html Mission Statement To provide leadership in conservation and teach stewardship of the soil, water, and related resources through a balanced cooperative program that protects, restores. and improves those resources. February 23, 2006 Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Liberty at Creekside Ms. Aanenson: The SWCD has taken the opportunity to review the Liberty at Creekside development. The plan reviewed is dated with a revision on 02/03/06. Please review and consider the following comments and suggestions regarding the SWPPP and erosion control and sediment controls. SWPPP A SWPPP is needed for the development and must be completed prior to applying for the NPDES permit. It is recommended the SWPPP be submitted to the City and SWCD for review prior to final approval. Erosion Control 1. A stable EOF for the pond is needed. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail is needed on the plan. 2. It is unclear how access to wetland mitigation areas will be done. It appears that a temporary creek crossing may be needed unless access can be gained from the west or south. The access and all erosion controls / restoration should be noted on the plan. 3. The storm sewer extension is planned outside of perimeter controls. Additional erosion control notes are needed on the plan; erosion control blanket will be needed within 24 hours of installation. 4. Energy dissipation is needed at the FES inlet to Pond A and the outlet FES to the Creek within 24 hours of installation. 5. It is assumed the grading occurring north of the site along Street A and Street B will be done by others and erosion control blanket will be applied following seeding within 7 days of final grade. Sediment Control 1. Curbside inlet control details are needed. Wimco-type inlet controls should be used and installed within 24 hours of installation of inlets. An EQUAL OPPORTUNITY LWI OVER 2. Typical building lot controls should be shown on the plan in a typical detail. These controls should include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the CO. 3. The proposed storm water pond should be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond should be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms / ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail is needed. An additional temporary sediment trap or basin may be needed near future lot 3, Block 1 during rough grading as it appears nearly 10 acres of disturbed area or more is shedding water to the creek in this area. 4. Silt fence adjustment will be needed once the inlet is installed to Pond A. The silt fence will have to be installed up and around the FES so the discharge to the pond is not impeded by the SF and cause erosion of the bank. Stormwater Maneement 1. An adequate easement for pond access for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. 2. It is recommended that the ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek be adjusted to discharge water parallel to the creek flow; presently the outlet is shown to discharge water perpendicular to the flow and could increase bank erosion of the creek. The FES should be turned to the SE to align with the creek. 3. It is assumed the pond located in the NW corner of the site is going to be done by others. A outlet location should be shown on the plan. If there are any questions or if I can be of further assistance please contact the SWCD office. Sincerely, Aaron Mlynek, CPESC Urban Conservation Technician c. Lori Haak, City of Chanhassen (email) CITY OF 1. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs CHANHASSEN must either be removed from site or chipped. Phone: 952.227.1130 MEMORANDUM 7700 Market Boulevard 2. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once PO Boz 147 construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Chanhassen, MN 55317 TO: Robert Generous AICP, Senior Planner on we952.227.11 Phone: 952.227.1100 FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal Fax: 952.227.1110 DATE: February 23, 2006 Building Inspections imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather Phone: 952.227.1180 driving abilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. g c� Fax: 952.227.1190 SUBJ: Request for rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R, Subdivision www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us with variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 30 lots, one outlot Engineering public right of ways, and site plan approval for 138 townhouses. Phone: 952.227.1160and Fax: 952.227.1170 The property is located east of Audubon Road and north of Pioneer Trail (1500 Pioneer Trail). Finance Phone: 952227,1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Planning Case: 05-24 Liberty at Creekside Park a Recreation I have reviewed the request for rezoning of the above project. In order to comply with Phone: 952.227.1120 the Chanhassen Fire D artment/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire Fax: 952.227.1110 Department/Fire g Recreation Center code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The plan review is based upon available 2310 Coulter Boulevard information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted, the Phone: 952.227.1400 appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning 11 1. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs Natural Resources must either be removed from site or chipped. Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 2. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once Public Worts construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 1591 Park Road Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 3. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the Senior Center imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather P:9522110 Fax: Fax:952227.17.111 driving abilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. g c� Web Site 4. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. Mr. Robert Generous AICP, Senior Planner February 23, 2006 Page 2 5. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 6. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 7. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required on the private streets. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of sign. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991. Copy enclosed. g:\safety\r6plrev05-24 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 7700 MARKET BLVD. PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1150 FAX: (952) 227-1190 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY # 06-1991 REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE LANE SIGNAGE 1. Signs to be a minimum of 12" x 18". NO PARKING 2. Red on white is preferred.FII2E LANE 3. 3M or equal engineer's grade reflective sheeting on aluminum is preferred. 4. Wording shall be: NO PARKING FIRE LANE 5. Signs shall be posted at each end of the fire lane and at least at 100 foot intervals along the fire lane. 6. All signs shall be double sided facing the direction of travel. 7. Post shall be set back a minimum of 12" but not more than 36" from the curb. (NOT T(l-- GRADE 8. A fire lane shall be required in front of fire dept. SCALE) connections extending 5 feet on each side and along all areas designated by the Fire Chief. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE ABOVE PROCEDURES SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING, WITH A SITE PLAN, FOR APPROVAL BY THE FIRE CHIEF. IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE CONTINUITY THROUGHOUT THE CITY BY PROVIDING THESE PROCEDURES FOR MARKING OF FIRE LANES. Revisions 6/10/02 3/22/05 Fire Lane Instillation 06-1991 Page 1 of 1 "w"t`o I&R Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 July 27, 2005 Bob Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 itnFiVED JUL 2 8 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SUBJECT: Liberty at Creekside Mn/DOT Review P05-080 North of New TH 212, East of Audubon Road Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1017 Dear Mr. Generous: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following issues: Access Control. ■ The access shown on this layout at TH 212 Right of Way has been eliminated. It is our understanding that although the location map submitted from the city shows an access onto Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14), that there will be no southerly access from this site. Rather, the access will be provided via a new east — west collector to the north of the site that connects from Audubon Road to proposed Powers Blvd (alignment not yet finalized.) In the future, please include access information with submittals. Please direct questions regarding this issue to Lynn Clarkowski, Mn/DOT's Area Engineer, at 651-634-2103, or Mary Lacho, Mn/DOT's TH 212 Design Engineer, at 952-368-5610 or mary.lacho(dWot.state.mn.us . Drainage: ■ A drainage permit will be required for this project. No additional runoff to Mn/DOT R/W will be allowed and all drainage patterns must be maintained. Please provide the following: 1) A Grading Plan of the existing & proposed project, showing topography, with Mn/DOT's right of way clearly marked. 2) Drainage area maps for the proposed project showing both existing and proposed drainage areas and flows (with flow arrows). 3) Storm sewer plans and pond plans, with flow arrows for all overland and conveyed water. An equal opportunity employer 4) Hydraulic computations/modeling for both existing and proposed conditions (i.e., Hydro -CAD input assumptions, calibration data, results for 10 and 100 year storm events). Please submit any further documentation electronically as Adobe Acrobat (.pd fl, and HydroCAD (.hc) files. If plans change, you must resubmit for review. The electronic model and pdf file can be emailed to iulie.whitcherna,dot.state.mn.us. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Julie Whitcher (651-634-2080) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources Engineering section. Permits: ■ Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT'S utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/utility . Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of Mn/DOT's Metro Permits Section. Right of Way /Surveys: ■ The "Existing Mn/DOT R/W" needs to be clearly labeled, and the existing access control needs to be shown (and have symbol shown in legend). Please direct any questions regarding this issue to Bruce Wetherbee of Mn/DOT's Metro West Surveys at 763-797-3110. Electronic Document Request: ■ As a final request, could you please send an electronic .pdf file copy of your plan submittal for our record keeping purposes to ivanita.voietCa,dot.state.mn.us Please refer to Mn/DOT Review #PO5-080 / Liberty at Creekside / CHN when emailing the .pdf file. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651)634-2083. vcerely, Juanita Voigt Transportation Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson / Carver County Engineer John Freemyer / Carver County Surveyor Westwood Professional Services Town and Country Homes CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on February 23, 2006, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Liberty at Creekside – Planning Case No. 05-24 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. KRden J. 3 Subscribed and sworn to before me this,o?84 day of jgjaLLcLA44, , 2006. Notary Pu he - 3a'"='"4 KIM T. MEUWISSE 4 ) Notary Public-Minnesta Sr ,;;,j' MY commission Expires Jan 31'02 010 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, March 7 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, Proposal: and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Planning File: 05-24 LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE Applicant: Town & Country Homes Property 1500 Pioneer Trail (east of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail Location: and northwest of future Highway 312) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous at 952-227-1131 or e-mail Questions & baenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit Comments: written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require ail property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard, Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. It you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time; Tuesday, March 7 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, Proposal: and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Planning File: 05-24 LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE Applicant: Town & Country Homes 1500 Pioneer Trail (east of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail Property and northwest of future Highway 312) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: 1, Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous at 952-227-1131 or e-mail Questions & baenerous®ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit Comments: written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Weiland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to wri merciallndustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal of cos and other sources regarding the area shover, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not Warrant Nat the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this mal, are error free, arrl the City does not represent that Me GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227.1107. The preceding fisclairrer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Suited. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or thiN parnes which arise M Of the users access or use of data provided. This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data locetetl in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Inlormatioo System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, ant the Cry does not represent that the GIS Data can be used far navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance of direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. It emors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be Bade for any damages, and expressly waives all clams, and agrees to defend, indermity, and hold harmless the Gty from any and all chi brought by User, its eopbyees or agents, or Nib paries which arse out of the users access or use of data provided GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS FOX PROPERTIES LP 27990 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 1630 LYMAN BLVD EXCELSIOR, MNN 5 5RD 5331 -7911 TRANSPORTATION BLDG CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9402 ST ST PAUL. MN 55155 -1801 PETERSON-JACQUES FARM LAND CO C/O SEVERIN H PETERSON JR 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 -4047 ARTHUR B JOHNSON 17448 FRONDELL CT EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-3416 NDI MINNESOTA LLC C/O HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MN LLC 7615 SMETANA LN SUITE 160 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346 -4700 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 24760 CEDAR POINT RD NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071 -4056 Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on March 1, 2006, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Liberty at Creekside — Planning Case No. 05-24 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this lak day of Mc,.rch 12006. Notary P K�Wn J. E hardt, puty Clerk KIM T. MEUWISSEN I Notary Public -Minnesota MY Co --*Ston area Jan 31, 2010 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING Dear Property Owner: On February 23, 2006, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing notice to you regarding the following proposal: • LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE: Request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District on property located at 1500 Pioneer Trail (east of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 - see location map on reverse side of this notice) — Planning Case No. 05-24. Applicant: Town & Country Homes The public hearing has been RESCHEDULED for Tuesday, March 21, 2006 in the City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Robert Generous at 952-227-1131 or by email: bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, or visit the City's NEW projects web page at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/sery/proiects.html CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING Dear Property Owner: On February 23, 2006, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing notice to you regarding the following proposal: • LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE: Request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District on property located at 1500 Pioneer Trail (east of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 - see location map on reverse side of this notice) — Planning Case No. 05-24. Applicant: Town & Country Homes The public hearing has been RESCHEDULED for Tuesday, March 21, 2006 in the City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Robert Generous at 952-227-1131 or by email: bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us, or visit the City's NEW projects web page at www.ci.chanhassen. mn. us/sery/projects. html Disclaimer This Map is neiMer a legally recorded map trot a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, inimination and data located in various cot, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding Me area shown, and is to be used for reference Wrposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare Nis Map are error free, and the City dose not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring emcong Measuremnt of distance or direction or precision in the deri of geographic features. H errors or discrepancies are found pease contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is proviced pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map scknowledges that Me City shall not be liable for any darreges, and expressly waives all claim, and agrees to defend, mdem ity, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties xfrub ansa out of the user access or use of data provident Disclaimer This map is rather a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map Is a cocpilmon of records, Infomxation and data located in various city. county. state and federal offices and other sources regarding Me area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that Me GIS Data can be used for navigational, Iracltirhg or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depctim of geographic features. g errors or discrepancies are found pease contact 952.227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03. Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages. and expressly waives all clams, and agrees to defend. mdertnify, and hold harmess the City from any and all claims brought by User, its er aloyees or agents, or Mira parties which anse out of the user aaass or use of data provided. Impression antibourrage et A s6chage rapide Utilisez le gabarit 51600 GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 1630 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9402 PETERSONJACQUES FARM LAND CO C/O SEVERIN H PETERSON JR 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 -4047 ARTHUR B JOHNSON 17448 FRONDELL CT EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-3416 www.avery.com AVERVID 51600 1 -900 -GO -AVERY FOX PROPERTIES LP STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 27990 SMITHTOWN RD 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -7911 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL, MN 55155 -1801 NDI MINNESOTA LLC C/O HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MN LLC G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 7615 SMETANA LN 24760 CEDAR POINT RD SUITE 160 NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071 -4056 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346 -4700 ®091,5 ®J\jJ�t/ AMAV-09-008-L ®091,5 31MIdW31 �anV asO worAi8A8'NVV nA 6uuuua aau a6onwc oue wer Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen 0 0 os-,:�q Planning Commission Meeting— March 21, 2006 14. All appropriate permissions and easements must be obtained prior to the undertaking of any construction. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE: REOUEST FOR REZONING OF PROPERTY FROM A2 TO PUD-; SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES OF APPROXIMATELY 36.01 ACRES INTO 29 LOTS, 5 OUTLOTS AND RIGHT RIGHT-OF-WAY; SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR 146 TOWNHOUSES: AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ALTERATIONS WITHIN THE FLOOD PLAIN AND DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED EAST OF AUDUBON ROAD, NORTH OF PIONEER TRAIL AND NORTHWEST OF FUTURE HIGHWAY 312 (1500 PIONEER TRAIL), PLANNING CASE NO. 05-24, TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES. Public Present: Name Address Shawn Siders Town and Country Homes Kevin Clark Town and Country Homes Chris Moehrl Westwood Professional Services Jeff Fox 5270 Howards Point Road Bruce Jeurissen Belle Plain Nancy Worm Belle Plain Jim Benshoof Wenck Associates Rick Dorsey 1551 Lyman Boulevard Kate Aanenson reviewed the findings of the AUAR. McDonald: You mentioned about diversity and the way we're building all of this and one of the things that I guess we've had this discussion before but these things keep kind of coming at us piecemeal and then it's difficult to put them into the context of the overall plan. At one time that area down there, we were looking at more commercial development for tax purposes, and what I'm seeing now by looking at this, this is becoming pretty much residential and how does that impact you know our comprehensive plan and what we're looking for. Aanenson: Good question. This property over here would like to go more commercial. Probably do new urbanism, mixed use project. And this piece over here is still guided industrial. So this piece would switch, it's guided low or medium, so they're contemplating a switch to a different land use. McDonald: As far as the overall stock then of what we have available for development, you feel that we're still okay as far as what we set aside for commercial? The possibility here for commercial development. 15 SCANNED Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Aanenson: Correct. Yes, with this property, yes. McDonald: Okay. And the road and the infrastructure that we put in would tend to support that if someone were to come in with a plan that would be acceptable. Aanenson: That's correct. McDonald: Okay. That's all I have. Sacchet: Any other questions for Kate? Thank you very much Kate. Bob you're on. Bob Generous continued with the staff report outlining the project. Sacchet: Thank you Bob. Questions. Debbie, you have any questions? Larson: Not at the moment. Sacchet: Not right now? Mark? Undestad: I just had one for you Bob. Just on that wetland. On item 10, page 18. MnDot right- of-way and you need more, they need to secure more land for wetland mitigation other than what they already have? Generous: The City has some land that they potentially can do the mitigation in. They just have to get the plan approved. They have to make sure that there's sufficient area for them to do it. It's a high quality wetland mitigation that they need to do and we think we have the site for that. Undestad: That would stay within the city? Generous: Yes, that would stay within the city. Sacchet: Okay. Dan. Keefe: Yeah, I've got a number of questions. Let me start, in regards to the rezoning. When you go PUD you don't need a variance for private streets, right? Generous: Correct. Also when you do multi, it's only for single family and twin homes that you need a variance on the use of a private street. Keefe: Right. And then the access road to the north is you said moved to the east because of slope reasons or? Generous: Multiple reasons. One, we wanted to get it onto MnDot right-of-way. Two, that's where yeah, there's significant slope. That's a bluff area in there and it's also heavily wooded. 16 Planning Commission Meeting—March 21, 2006 The Bluff Creek Overlay District has designated that whole hill as the primary zone and we're trying to preserve it in it's natural state. Keefe: Yeah, it looks like there's a hill, does it have bluff on the south end of this property or any others to the north? Generous: Not on the north. Keefe: I see a 30% slope looks like down maybe on the south end. None of these other ones. Generous: No, they don't. Keefe: It looks like they're, yeah. Well okay. Retaining walls, you said they're terracing. What are the heights of the retaining walls? When you look at the north, it looks like one elevation comes out at 948 on the north end. Aanenson: We can let the applicant go through that. They have a slide show too and they've reduced all those and I think they can answer some of those questions. Keefe: Okay. Sacchet: That's it? Jerry. McDonald: Yeah, I've got some questions that you know we talked about diversity of housing and everything and one of the concerns I have about this is, to me it looks a lot like Liberty on Bluff Creek. And I guess my concern is that if we're going to look at diversity of housing styles and you know different types of appearances, I'm not sure we're meeting that here. And the question is, have you worked with the developer a little bit to get this to be a more distinctive neighborhood than just Liberty on Bluff Creek East? Aanenson: We made that suggestion so. So that's their marketing and how they want to present it. McDonald: Well I guess, you know that is a concern because that's one of the things that we talked about, and I know you went through a lot with Liberty on Bluff Creek and we did a lot to try to get the look and feel of that. Okay, that's the only question I have for staff. Sacchet: Just to follow up on this. So is this kind of a variation of the Liberty development to the west? Aanenson: Correct. Generous: Yes, it uses two of the basic unit types that they have. Sacchet: It's the same type of, except there is a third view in a time. 17 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Generous: Well in the other one there's 4 I believe. Aanenson: Yeah, I think if they went through that they can show you the product. Sacchet: Alright. So if there are no further questions for staff, I'd like to invite the applicant. If you want to come forward. If you want to add to what staff presented. Anything you want to add. You want to mention your name. Shawn Siders: Yeah, sure. Good evening Mr. Chairman. Commissioners. My name is Shawn Siders and I'm with Town and Country Homes, a K. Hovnanian Company. With me this evening I have Kevin Clark. He's our Vice President of Land Development. And with us also is Chris Moehrl, our project engineer with Westwood Professional Services. We're pleased to be in front of you this evening to present with the Creekside. And since we first came to the commission and spoke to you in August, we made a number of revisions and we're excited about those revisions and I`ll share those with you in a few moments but before we do have that conversation I just want to run through the two products that we are offering on the Creekside. I'm going to ... presentation here because I have some photographs. Sacchet: Solving the technical problems. Needs to be waken up. If you want to pull the microphone a little straighter to me and we get better audio. Thank you. Let's see, did we manage to wake up the laptop? It's in hibernation huh. Back up hard copy. It's always good to have handy. Something's happening. Do you want to jump in from another angle while they're trying to fix that for you? Shawn Siders: No problems. If we could actually have this zoom on to the table here. The first product that we're offering in Liberty Creekside is a traditional. Got it? Sacchet: No, that's on the table. Alright. Shawn Siders: Is a traditional townhome collection that we've named the Premiere Collection. We propose development of 98 of these units as Bob indicated around the perimeter of the development. These units are 3 levels of living space and range in square foot from 1,500 to 2,400 square feet each. Sacchet: So they're walk out in the back? Shawn Siders: Walkout, look out and full basements. Just depending on the topography of each unit. Sacchet: How many of those units do you have in the bigger body of your development to the west? Shawn Siders: Within Bluff Creek there are 98 I believe. 54? Sacchet: 54, okay. 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Aanenson: It's a smaller number isn't it? Sacchet: Smaller number, okay. Aanenson: It's the smallest of the unit types. Shawn Siders: Yes, correct. Each of these units do have a 2 car front loaded garage with a, as Bob indicated, a driveway that will accommodate 2 additional vehicles. Since we last discussed this project with you we've also added additional exterior treatments, as you can see. We have introduced brick and stone. Varied color patterns as well as varied building materials within you know each unit, which is certainly an upgrade from what we have used in other communities where we've introduced the Premiere product line. We've done this for a variety of reasons, and most importantly is to create a unique community presence with these Premiere units. The price point for these are approximately $275,000 to $300,000. The second produce is our urban row home collection that we have named the Concord Collection. We proposed development of 48 of these units within the interior of the development. These units are also 3 levels of living space and range in square footage from approximately 1,700 to 2,400 square feet. Each unit also has a standard 2 car rear loaded garage so these will, from the street, and there's also a driveway that will accommodate 2 additional vehicles. We've also, and these as well included upgrade of the architecture. Included additional facade treatments as well as brick and stone. We've added awnings as well as raised decks to provide additional private space outdoors in addition to just the court yard. And the price ranges for this collection is $230,000 to $250,000. In addition to the varied building materials on the facade we've also developed 5 color schemes that will be used throughout the development. Here is the color board. Now this does not include stone. We're working with our color consultant to actually finalize this and complete this, to include the stone. But you can see here that these 5 color schemes will be used throughout the development and so we're creating an anti monotony standard that we would implement in any other community. Sacchet: And how many of those units do you have in the other? There are more of those, right? Shawn Siders: There are more of those, yes sir. Sacchet: Do we know about how many? Kevin Clark: There's like 106. Sacchet: Over 100, okay. Thank you. Shawn Siders: Now I'd like to switch just to some of the overall changes that we've implemented into the plan since we last discussed these with you in August. In August we did present to you a homogenous community with a traditional townhome design. Since then we have revisited the product mix and have expanded our home side offering to include an urban row home, which is our Concord Collection, and those are located here throughout the center of the development. The Premiere product line, our traditional townhome is placed around the perimeter of the development and the reason we revisited the product mix is because the 19 i 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Planning Commission did express an interest in seeing you know diversity in products. We wanted to also provide a unique community presence with the two products, and offer additional life cycle housing opportunities to the current and future residents. Upon review of the overall site plan after our previous discussion, we've also altered the layout from what you previously saw. We have rotated this building 90 degrees so that we do have a varied streetscape. We have actually removed the Premiere building that was located in this cul-de-sac here, and that's just been integrated into the site. We have narrowed this street up here to make it a private street. We have also revised the second access to go through the MnDot property, as Bob indicated. We've included 21 guest parking areas that were not previously designated. We have a guest parking area here. There's I I spaces in this cul-de-sac and there are actually 10 spaces up here. Now we understand that there will be parking allowed on public streets, but we also understand that parking will be prohibited within the private streets, and so they will be posted as such and we've accommodated that additional parking within these parking areas within each pod. During the evolution of this plan and based on your previous direction, we have worked to tighten up the site and reduce the overall retaining walls. Since we last visited with you we have actually reduced the overall height of the retaining walls by 300/e. We've also worked diligently with your parks and recreation board to identify the preferred location of a trail through the development. As Mr. Generous indicated we have provided a trail configuration that runs through the southern perimeter of the home sites, and that will impact the Bluff Creek Overlay District. We have, as well as the City have worked awfully diligently to make sure that there is no development impacts within the primary Bluff Creek Overlay District. However, in evaluating different alignments we've come to the conclusion that this trail configuration makes the most sense for the community as well as our development because we're also able then to tie in this trail configuration here. This will be preserved as an open space. We anticipate having a shelter with some benches to provide an open area, an active open area for our residents to enjoy. Primary access to the site, as Mr. Generous indicated will be through the Degler-Peterson parcel at an intersection that's prescribed by the city. The second access, and we really have to thank Lori Haak who was here earlier this evening and Kate for their diligent work on finding a creative solution to protect the Bluff Creek, the primary Bluff Creek Overlay District in this wooded area, through the Fox property and we've identified a second access that we can, that we will work with MnDot and we'll work with the City to transfer some of the wetland mitigation that will be required with the MnDot project to a city owned property and we will work with those various agencies to transfer that responsibility and basically take over the creation of that additional high quality wetland. It is our understanding that previously MnDot did provide an access agreement with Mr. Jeurissen to access his home from Pioneer Trail road. We've reviewed this access agreement and it only proposes access for the existing single family home, and it does stipulate within it that it will be extinguished once the site is developed and their residence is more than this one single family house living on this site. That access point was never proposed to provide a fully developed access to this neighborhood in going forward. One other item that's come up during the discussions since we last visited with you, city management and staff has proposed the creation of a Lyman Avenue fee to share in the cost of upgrading Lyman Avenue. Based on the plan that we've presenting to you this evening, we understand and agree with that Lyman Avenue fee and we are proud to partner with the City to create the opportunities to upgrade, to create additional capital projects that will provide additional long term benefits to the current and future residents of the city. Finally at the last meeting of the commission, and hopefully Commissioner McDonald this gets a little bit to what you were 20 • 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 asking about earlier. The commission asked that we illustrate the views of this development from the Peterson parcel. We worked with our engineer and obtained our plans to develop a sketch that will kind of illustrate how the Peterson parcel will look at the Liberty at Creekside project once both are fully developed. And if you could zoom in just a little bit. You can see here, this is actually the proposed Peterson development, and this is the Liberty at Creekside development. Now this is at the closest point of the two developments and these are about 700 feet in distance from one another. You'll note that of course that much of this area will be landscaped and there is quite a distance and the Peterson parcel is actually a little bit higher than what the Liberty at Creekside development will beat it's low point here. So we just kind of wanted to show the commission how these two developments would look on one another and there will be a lot of buffer and we really do feel that this is an appropriate transition between the Peterson neighborhood and the Liberty at Creekside neighborhood. And finally I'd just like to take this opportunity to thank city staff for their support during the evolution of this project. It's certainly been a work in progress. I'd also like to thank you for your past support on the Liberty and Bluff Creek project and hopefully your support on the project before you this evening, and I look forward to answering any questions you may have. Sacchet: Thank you. Do we have questions? Keefe: Yeah, I've got a couple. When you're putting in the trail along the Bluff Creek, how do you minimize the impacts? Shawn Siders: We will be grading to a certain extent of that area anyways so we've worked with the engineer. We're just going to have to be very diligent in implementing our NPDES permit and working with city staff to really minimize and finalizing the exact configuration so that we minimize the Bluff Creek Overlay District to the extent that it is possible so that we can accommodate that trail configuration. Keefe: Okay. One of the things that I saw was there was a number of, and I don't know if it's on your current plan but there were a number of trees that are fairly significant trees which you're taking out on the north end of your property. Are those still slated to come out? Shawn Siders: Yes sir. Keefe: Okay. So that remains the same? Shawn Siders: Yes sir. Keefe: Okay. Ahight, that's all. Shawn Siders: Somebody asked at the previous question, I'll just jump in. Somebody asked what the D stood for in the landscaping plans. That actually stands for a multi -trunk tree so. So in case anybody's still curious this evening, that's what that stands for. 21 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Keefe: Well and it does look like you've added, it looks like you've exceeded the minimums in regards to landscaping it looks like, and is there a chunk of that on the south side of the creek or is most of that on the north side? Shawn Siders: A majority of that is serving to the south side of, you know within the wetland mitigation area but we do also have a pretty aggressive landscaping plan as we do within each most of our communities too, to really dress it up and add a character, create a neighborhood feel. Keefe: Well that's terrific. Sacchet: Okay? Jerry. McDonald: Yeah, I have some questions for you. Can you compare the prices for the Concord and the Premiere back up in Liberty on Bluff Creek with this development? Shawn Siders: The sales prices will be comparable. McDonald: And I guess the thing I'm having problems with as I brought up before is when we talked about diversity, I'm concerned about these neighborhoods looking the same and it's just you know a continual thing. Now I understand you've got a break but you're also doing a development in another piece of property inbetween here. How is this going to be different if I drive through the neighborhood, how am I going to be able to tell a difference between these and the ones up on Liberty on Bluff Creek? Shawn Siders: Understood. Let me get to your, I don't know if it was a question more than a statement but we did study a number of possible development scenarios and one of those did include the introduction of a single family home product that we offer into this site. And with the partnership that we're making with the city to expand Bluff Creek Boulevard and the associated utility improvements with that, with the Lyman Avenue fee and what these other items, the cost to develop the land and then the subsequent cost of a house was really outside of a market that we weren't comfortable with involving ourselves. So that is kind of hopefully answering your question as to why we've landed where we have because we have studied it very carefully. How this is going to vary from Liberty on Bluff Creek is quite honestly the views. This development will have striking views of course of the creek, as well as the wetland mitigation areas. We're making a number of site improvements that will be different from Liberty on Bluff Creek. Where we have a swimming pool there, we have, it has more natural amenities on this site. McDonald: Well I guess maybe you're misunderstanding my point in all this. I'm not questioning the product that you're putting on the land. I think you've done a good job as far as the layout. What I'm questioning is, is the distinctiveness between the two neighborhoods, and I guess what I look at is, that's more of a facade approach. You know the outside can look a little bit different and that's my concern here is that there is no difference between the two neighborhoods. And one of the things that we looked at going forward in this was to get diversity. I know we've had conversations about that, you know with Liberty on Bluff Creek 22 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 and to your credit I think you've done an excellent job there. My concern here again is, what's the difference? And that's one of the things we're trying to put in this area is uniqueness as far as product. Again I'm not questioning the fact you're putting townhomes. Or I'm not saying it should be single family. What you've got's fine. It's the way it looks. That's my question to YOU. Shawn Siders: Understood and I appreciate the, at least the support of you know what we're proposing and how the site is laid out. We do appreciate that because we did spend a lot of time with that. As far as the difference in the products or the alteration or the difference in the product, not the product mix but the exterior or the facades and how those will be treated, what I can say is, and we do have, you know we have the same color scheme introduced as Liberty on Bluff Creek but something that we can look at is how the color configurations are matched. So perhaps the Liberty on Bluff Creek, while it's designed the color you know color groupings are combined in a certain way, we can certainly look at introducing a different, I'm trying to find the right word here, scheme in how we necessarily design the colors because they are relatively distinct from one another. McDonald: Okay, then what you're saying is you are willing to consider at least the color schemes and some maybe fagade schemes that would give some uniqueness to this neighborhood. Shawn Siders: What I would say is that, and it's difficult to explain because we haven't gone to this extent yet with Creekside but what we would be willing to consider is the colors on this particular board are introduced into the community, if you will. So for instance Liberty on Bluff Creek has a grouping of let's say 2 or 3 buildings that use a single color you know and then they're next to let's say color scheme 4. Perhaps there are ways that we can, and that's a common element as you go through Liberty on Bluff Creek. Perhaps we can look at you know just one perhaps working with 5 and then that works well with 3 and 2 and so introducing different patterns into how the color schemes are actually implemented into Creekside. McDonald: Okay, so you are willing to work with the city to come up with some uniqueness in this development. Shawn Siders: Yes sir, within this color board we'd certainly be willing to. McDonald: Within that color board. And that color board again what you're looking at is you're not going to use all of that down at Liberty at Bluff Creek are you? Isn't that kind of the choices you're looking at. Shawn Siders: We've introduced all 5 color schemes. McDonald: All 5 colors now. Okay. I hate to put you on the spot on this and everything but it's just, this was one of the things that we looked at as far as development in this area and what we were trying to do as far as diversity and you have to understand, I feel kind of strongly about this. And again working with you on the Liberty on Bluff Creek I think you all did an excellent job there. I appreciate the fact that you're willing to work with the city. Realign the road. Redo 041 • 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 things. I know that that's not easy, and again I am not questioning the product type you're trying to put on the site. I'm not saying anything about that. I'm looking for strictly uniqueness. Shawn Siders: Understood. McDonald: And I'm sorry for. Shawn Siders: No, no. I appreciate that. No, I appreciate that. McDonald: That's the heart of the question I want to get at is how are we going to make this different. Shawn Siders: Understood. Sacchet: Alright? Debbie. Larson: Just to expand a little bit on what Commissioner Jerry was saying. I mean looking at this row of 6, to me that's you know, it's a nice design. Is there any way that you guys would consider maybe doing within each set of 2, different colors? I mean just to get it to, to me this looks like a row house you know and then in the back side it's very boring, but that's okay. I mean, but is there, well I don't know. I look at the back and I just kind of go, well you know to me that looks like an apartment complex on the back side. Shawn Siders: Understood. Larson: And so, what I'm wondering is, is there any way of the paint you know and the color scheme if you've accepted all those, and they're all very fuzzy I think. Shawn Siders: Thank you. Larson: You know, is it possible that you could break it up somehow and make it not look like such a long stretch of you know. Shawn Siders: Understood. Larson: Just a thought I mean. Shawn Siders: Can I perhaps point out what we have done, and I don't know how clear it will show up on this is, this is I believe the same product that you were just looking at but there are actually, that was Premiere. We have actually introduced a varied color palette as you go from you know this is a different color from this which is a different color from this, so we have. Larson: Right, yeah that's what I'm talking about. Shawn Siders: Yeah, so we will do that. 24 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Kevin Clark: But not on the Premiere product. Larson: Not on this one? Shawn Siders: The Premiere. Kevin Clark: We reviewed this also on Liberty on Bluff Creek and the challenge you get into is we have different elevations with these and they bridge through different units when you have garages with different roof associations, and when we start mixing all those palettes, I think the goal you know. Larson: Oh I see. Well that's what I'm saying if you do 2. Kevin Clark: Becomes kind of yucky because you're blending too many colors. We're working with a very professional color consultant to not only bring together the colors but also the materials so we're working with varying siding sizes. Different textures with the shake and then also your roofing. We've introduced, I guess going back even into Liberty, you know stepping back into the project, and I know Commissioner McDonald your request for diversity, is that we've elevated the diversity and the architecture throughout the project and in moving into the Creekside neighborhood, we thought we had met that objective and were also going to bring that to this portion of the site too. But from a color standpoint, this product is, just doesn't lend itself to kind of that alternating color scheme because it's just. Larson: Well I'm not saying every unit. Kevin Clark: But even within the products, when you change the roof lines. I'm sorry, go ahead. Larson: Well I don't know, I'm just trying to help you alleviate a problem without having to come up with any major design changes. More so just in colors that you know. McDonald: I guess the thing that you know, if I could kind of expand upon that. You've got another development between here and Liberty on Bluff Creek. Shawn Siders: Correct. McDonald: My concern is, I don't want to see all the same things going down Pioneer Trail. That's what we're trying to break up and I guess, and again we went through at Liberty at Bluff Creek. It is not our position to tell you what colors to put on there. Shawn Siders: Correct. McDonald: Heaven forbid. We're not designers. All we can say is we would like to say something that accomplishes a goal. And I think how you do it, that's your job. All we're trying to do is give you a little bit of guidance and again, we want to get some diversity so that the people as they drive through these neighborhoods, they are distinctive and people who move into 25 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 them can take some pride in them. It's not just that we're the eastern part of this other development, that's the big development. And that's all we're looking for is you know down the road. You know we pride ourselves on individual communities and the fact that people are very proud of their communities around here. I mean we get that all the time. We're trying to make sure that that happens again with the development you've got. You come before. You do a good product. We have a lot of faith and confidence in you, and that's I think all we're trying to say here tonight is yeah, maybe we've got a little bit of problem on diversity. What can you do about it? Kevin Clark: At this point I think we feel we've done what we need to do. We've stepped up and provided four separate products in the projects at Liberty. Advanced the architecture. Advanced the color palette. What we look at here is from a timing standpoint, this is rolling out 3 years after we start Liberty. We'll probably do some grading next year but really not start units until the following year. So this is a roll out position for us, and why then we are with the two products here, we have a small contingent of the products that Commissioner Larson is talking about. The more traditional townhome product that we would plan on moving into in Creekside. We're investing millions of dollars into a model center that we'll be starting this spring to support all these products, and look at this again as a support item opportunity for us then to also play on that investment. So it is key for us that in, while I hear what yourself and others are maybe saying about diversity, we think we are adding that and that this site, as Shawn mentioned, I think is built on those views. The fact that I don't think you're going to really see the site. Driving down Pioneer and driving down the new collector road, you're going to have to come into this neighborhood to really observe and get a feel for what this little nitch market here in this area is going to really feel like. With the streetscape and more urban product facing the road, and then the traditional product which on purpose went around the perimeter to fit into the contour. To allow the walkout units to more accommodate the grade. I think that the area's going to be diverse or have that uniqueness by the nature of it's setting and how we set the product into the topography. Sacchet: I have two questions primarily. One is kind of a detail question. It just reminded me when you said they're all walkout, the Premiere levels. Premiere type. Also the ones on the very north. Kevin Clark: No, as Shawn mentioned earlier there will be full basement, some lookout and the walkouts... Sacchet: Okay, so there's a mix like that. Okay. My main question is retaining walls. You mentioned you were able to reduce the height of retaining walls. Could you walk us through a little bit the retaining wall situation if you would please. Shawn Siders: Sure. When we were first in front of you in August, I believe we were proposing a 30 foot retaining wall on the northern edge of the development. Since that time we've actually introduced a tiered retaining wall system and this lower retaining wall will actually be 10 feet tall and this upper retaining wall will be 11 feet tall. The tallest retaining wall in the entire site, and part of it is to support the street. The other part is to accommodate the trail. This one will be 15 feet here. These other retaining walls will be shorter than as our these walls as well as these 26 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 walls. These retaining walls I guess let me back up a little bit. These retaining walls will also tier retaining walls. These will be 11 feet tall and then this one will be 4 feet tall, and this one will be 8 feet tall. Of course any retaining wall over 4 feet in height in the city will have to be designed by a professional engineer and we understand that and we have no problem working with city staff to design a retaining wall that is, you know will support the site and will accommodate and have long term value to the site. Sacchet: Okay, thank you. It looks like we have no further questions for you. Thank you very much for answering our questions and your presentation. With that, this is a public hearing so I'd like to invite any residents that would like to address this item to come forward at this time. Seeing, do I see somebody trying to get up. Yes, I do see somebody trying to get up. If you want to come forward. State your name and address for the record and let us know what you have to say. Jim Benshoof. Good evening Mr. Chairman, members of the commission. My name is Jim Benshoof, traffic engineer with the firm of Wenck and Associates and we have been retained by Jeff Fox and Rick Dorsey to participate with others on a planning team on their behalf to begin planning efforts for their property. Coordinate with city staff. Coordinate with developers of other nearby properties in terms of the overall planning for this area, and I'd like to offer, well just a few remarks as to an interface we see relative to this project. Just as Kate earlier began with a bit of an overview, I would like to do the same very briefly. So we're representing the property outlined in yellow, that owned by Rick Dorsey, Jeff Fox and others in their families. We have from a traffic standpoint, kind of the items outlined in pink are of particular importance, and of course they include the east/west collector roadway through the property. Given the projection for 12,000 vehicles a day ultimately on that roadway. The alignment, the design are very important, and we look forward to further follow up with city staff as to those issues coordinating with ultimate development of the property. And then to the west another matter of great importance is a planned north/south roadway that is part of the AUAR. A roadway intended to connect the east/west collector to Lyman Boulevard and of course it also would have a real importance in connecting and providing access for this development now before you. So that's very important. We again have full intentions to follow up further with city staff, developer of the property to the west, and others as appropriate for the continued planning of that north/south roadway. Then lastly, shown in pink, the item I'd like to focus a little more attention on this evening as it relates to Liberty at Creekside, and that is the suggestion for a second means of access to and from this Liberty at Creekside development. This is just a little more of a blow up of that area, and the, in the pink of course is the entry road on the west connecting into this Liberty at Creekside development. The comment in the staff report indicating a need for a second means of entry and access, and that what has been kind of dashed in blue as the logical choice. And granted that the alignment of course is flexible, not totally set with the suggestion in the staff report that it simply come onto that MnDot right-of-way from the Liberty at Creekside property. And though, I mean I can see myself a lot of logic for that sort of connection. It also involves some pretty serious you know questions and I think issues that still remain to be addressed. You note the notation of an expectation of about 600 to 700 vehicles per day. That is based on the, of course the planned magnitude of development in Liberty at Creekside and the typical trip generation, the traffic patterns that would be expected. So we would expect that Liberty at Creekside would generate you know 600 to 700 vehicles per day on that roadway and 27 0 w Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 of course about 1,000 feet of that roadway would extend through the Fox property before it reaches the east/west collector roadway. Well why is that an issue? Because it's an issue at the present time because as this exhibit illustrates, the current guiding, as I understand, for this property in question, low density residential. Generous: Medium. Aanenson: Low or medium. Generous: Medium density. Aanenson: Low or medium. Jim Benshoof: Okay, it's low or medium. Thank you for that. Sorry. Generous: On Fox's property. Jim Benshoof: Okay, well thank you for that correction. Now the point being that what that guiding, low or medium density residential, a road coming through that property, serving 600 to 700 vehicles per day for the adjacent property, would be a significant impact. And one could suggest quite a high likelihood of conflicts, of some incompatibility with that level of traffic relative to that type of development. And so just think it important that you at this time sort of recognize these unanswered questions relative to what would be the effect on that property. And further would suggest that one way or the other, as the city proceeds with Liberty at Creekside, there be measures to try to ensure a satisfactory outcome, both in terms of access for Liberty at Creekside and for avoidance of undue negative impacts on the Fox property. And I'd like to share with you kind of examples of two possibilities as to sort of options to preserve and I'll admit before showing these to you that they represent some wild and crazy ideas, and I'm not meaning to suggest that either of these is the absolute answer, but rather to use these as examples to encourage you to try to retain flexibility and avoid the potential future problems. One would be kind of some concept like this whereby there is a public loop street system created within Liberty at Creekside. The sole access to the east/west collector, but the problem associated with an excessively long cul-de-sac would be avoided by having a public loop street system. Part of that would cross the comer of the Fox property but 1 understand that possibly could be worked out in terms of a possible street align, so I'll offer that as again as one possible option. The other one that is, a subject that has been already addressed somewhat. I'm not sure of the absolute status of this. This notion that there has been some approval on the part of MnDot for access south to Pioneer Trail, and again I don't know the exact status of that but perhaps that is still an option that would be worthy of some investigation. So again with that I'm just suggesting that the, this notion of a second access that would first cross into the MnDot property and then ultimately the Fox property to the east/west collector roadway is not an option that just does not have some serious questions associated with it. And would simply advise that you recognize those questions and seek to preserve options, so that again that property would not incur serious negative impacts and of course that other objectives of the city also would be met at the same time. M • 0 Planning Commission Meeting -March 21, 2006 Sacchet: Thank you. Kate, do you want to say anything about this or maybe Alyson or Bob. Aanenson: Sure. I'll briefly say both options were explored early on. We've already indicated, as has the applicant, researched the access to the south. That's where the existing home as it stays today with future development as any situation where we have a private drive onto a state road, or a county road. We always try to, our ordinance prohibits that. In this circumstance the driveway was given just for the existing home. ...we worked with MnDot to try to explore that option and it has been eliminated as an option. Sacchet: That's the south access. Aanenson: That is the south access. So it has been eliminated as an option. Fauske: Plus the creek crossing. The additional creek, the environmental. Aanenson: Which is huge. We'd have to go back and amend the AUAR so in working with MnDot, that was eliminated as an option. The applicant did look at the loop system and there's grade issues and I'll let Alyson address that... Fauske: Planning commissioners, we actually examined that alignment, that looped alignment. A couple months ago we were in a meeting looking at that second access issue and we looked at it and the grades are simply prohibitive through there to make that additional connection. In addition we looked at the impact to the trees up there. You know a nice bluff of trees up there and just looking at taking out those trees for a road when there was another alternative. For those reasons we. Sacchet: So that was ruled out as well. Fauske: Yes it was. Sacchet: Okay. That leaves a question of the impact. How big an impact does, are we impacting this property by basically putting a requirement of the road access on there, do we? Aanenson: Well let me take that... If you look at all the properties, all the properties are connected together. We've seen different scenarios from the developer. This is my first time seeing the single family application that they've shown on the site, but the fact that they're similarly zoned, even at that, if they came in and put the zoning in place, it's... Sacchet: So it's compatible from that angle. Aanenson: And again, we believe it's responsible to provide access to these other properties. Sacchet Right, because we do that across the whole city I mean this is not an isolated case. Aanenson: That's correct. And we'll look at that. We're happy to work with them on flexibility. Wherever they want to tie in, they've shown us a drop, loop road off of that collector 29 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 road, it can be tied in numerous ways. It could be a secondary access if it becomes a commercial development that really we feel strongly... McDonald: Mr. Chairman. Sacchet: Yes Jerry. McDonald: Just a question for staff. This issue came up last week at the City Council meeting. My understanding was that the direction that you got was to work with the property owners and that that's why the road at this point stops at the property line to give you an opportunity to come up with the alternatives as to how this is going to interconnect, isn't that right? Aanenson: Correct. McDonald: So this is really an issue that you all are currently working with. Aanenson: Correct. At this point it stops at their, it can be worked into the future plan and we're not prohibiting tying it down. There's flexibility... McDonald: So the position of that road at this point does not affect our decision tonight. Aanenson: The position of the road on? McDonald: The one to the northeast that they, Town and Country's actually realigned a little bit. Generous: As far as going across MnDot's property. Aanenson: Where it goes from there, there's flexibility in that. How that ties into the Fox parcel. Generous: Or into the east/west collector. McDonald: Well then if you haven't settled the connect the dots issue, we have. Aanenson: You never do when you stub a road to at the property. You have to take it to the terminus. This has come out on numerous subdivisions, site plans. You do the best you can and based on the information they've given us, the information of the developer, we've got a responsibility... Go back to the AUAR. This is the segment we're talking about through here and we've seen numerous iterations through here, including a drop road, something that would tie through so this road could swing into that. Wherever that works out where there is commercial, residential, I mean there's flexibility but yeah, our job now and our obligation to provide that stub street as we would, these people have stubbed you know, as Degler, just as on Pioneer Pass comes in, we're asking them to provide an access here so they can get access to this property. This developer is developing south of this wetland. The creek area. They are still providing right-of-way for this project. 30 • Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 McDonald: Okay, well that's my question. At this point where the stub is at doesn't affect our approval of the PUD at this point then. Aanenson: Of this PUD? McDonald: Right. The one for. Aanenson: Yes, it does. McDonald: Okay, then now I'm confused. If we approve the PUD and the road changes, what happens to the developer? We just approved something that may have to change. Aanenson: I don't believe this would change. What we're saying is once it gets to this point, it can be worked into their plans when it comes in. We're willing to work with them. That was the issue that was brought up at the council on Monday. Wherever that ends up. McDonald: Right, and as I understood at the council, all of that is pretty much a black box at this point and you're supposed to fill in the points working with all the owners to come up with an agreeable solution. Aanenson: Correct. McDonald: Okay. So if we approve the area tonight with the road where it's at, is that going to work with the possible scenarios that you know you've been. Aanenson: The staffs position is yes. McDonald: Okay. Aanenson: Their position, no. Sacchet: We got that. McDonald: Okay. And the developer understands. Sacchet: The public hearing's still open. You'll get a chance to talk. Aanenson: Just so you know, this debate's been going on for a couple of years. McDonald: Yeah I know. Aanenson: So between the staff and the... Sacchet: Alright, the public hearing is still open. I see some people itching to get up. If you want to come forward. State your name and address please for the record and pull that microphone towards you please. 31 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Jeff Fox: My name is Jeff Fox representing the Fox Family and the 54 acres that abuts up south to the Jeurissen parcel here and I have three things that come up. If this project's not going anywhere but grading tonight, what's the hurry to make a decision when we don't have the defined area involved as far as the north collector street and where this is going to come in on the east/west collector. That's still somewhat open. As we were told by I think 2 or 3 council members, I think it was 2 that I can say that the council members told us that staff was supposed to work with us to come up with a reasonable solution that would benefit to all parties involved, and that's the concern to me. I agree with you that it's a tree preservation area. I don't know how many people have been out from the city itself I've spent numerous hours out there and we're in the process right now of evaluating each and every tree within there. There's a fair amount of that that's called grub in there, and a lot of that with dead trees in that area. There are a lot of mature oak trees too, and I'm well aware of that. I want to respect that issue, but I think we need to take into consideration how much impact are we talking about. Are we talking about taking our 2 or 3 here? Whether we're taking out a clump on the hill. To where they're wanting to grade the land to begin with. I'm just questioning are we making a decision on something that needs to be made at this time as long as there's no project moving forward as far as development purposes. And as far as that road to the south, it was never, or the road to the north, it was never brought to our attention. We found that through reading the propaganda, or the information to the city of Chanhassen in their site. Nor were we brought to our attention, addressed to the Fox family or the development area we're talking about did the City ever contact us to discuss this issue. Sacchet: Let me ask you a question. I want to make sure I understand clearly what your key point is and when you're talking about the trees, are you referring to like a particular option that needed to be further explored or can you be more specific please? Jeff Fox: Correct. There was a comment, I mean there was a proposal from Jim Benshoof, our representative, traffic engineer who was here tonight with an alternative, a loop road cutting the corner of our tree area there. Of the tree preservation area. And that was what I was talking about there. I would like to let Rick talk more about elevations because I think you'll find that the elevation difference from that location to where the comer is cut, to the elevation where the road stops, is I think a 10 foot difference. Now there is some grade drop but it's not as substantial. Not near as substantial as the rise that's coming up to this interchange, nor is it from coming from the people up to this interchange. Sacchet: So your point is that the loop option should be further explored? Jeff Fox: I'm not, I want you to understand something, I'm just looking at trying to work with staff, with the idea that we look at these options. That has never been addressed. Never been talked to us about. We have talked about different alternative layouts of our land. We're kind of held back right now because we're trying to go different guiding due to the fact that the negative impact of having all this traffic brought onto our property. When Jim was bringing these numbers up, I think he was dealing with thinking it was 119 units. We weren't aware it's 146 units, so it's actually more traffic than the numbers we're talking about. I mean we just don't feel single or medium density, seeing the additional traffic up and above the 12,200 cars they 32 • 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 expected for that area to begin with, that's going to be beneficial. I mean that's got to be a negative impact on the residents... Sacchet: So let me clarify also that, are you concerned about the traffic volume or are you concerned about just having a road in the first place? What's your main concern? Jeff Fox: Well I think there's a couple things. We're trying to mitigate the amount of traffic on the east/west collector. Trying to reduce it because right now the traffic counts are higher than what's on Lyman today based on the very easterly portion of it. Okay, so we're trying to mitigate that as one issue, and we're trying to keep some of the value that's left in that parcel by not cutting it into another piece right now. Our piece is carrying a lot of the cast/west collector road. I think the largest percentage of the east/west collector road goes across the Fox property to start with. Sacchet: So, what I also hear you say is that you like to... Jeff Fox: ...work on these issues in advance instead of finding them out through the minutes or say that we've been looked at these because I'd just like to believe that there's better, a possible options and then when I hear tonight that they're 2 to 3 years away before building in there, I'm going what's another month or so to work this out or 2 months because right now I think there's a market study coming that might have some impacts to what's going to take place in this 2005 area. And it might have some say where the road needs to go. It might have some say on what size the road needs to be in certain areas. Sacchet: Yeah, and that's something we struggle with all the time. I mean we can't prescribe the time line to particular developer. Just as we can't tell you have to develop now, we can't tell the other guy he has to wait until you come around. And working together quite often involves not being of the same opinion so then the challenge of working together is that we bridge that and I'd certainly like to encourage everybody to work together, especially when you're not of the same opinion because that's when it's needed. But that's getting to comments and, did you want to add anything else today? Jeff Fox: Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you sir. Does staff want to make a comment to any of this? That wasn't a continent. McDonald: You got our attention now. Sacchet: Woke everybody up. Aanenson: We had a dialogue about the road connection. We understand that the two property owners do not want any connection to their property. On this side, the north side ... I guess our position is we want to try to work those out. Just be clear that the 2005 study, excuse me the commercial study that we're expecting to get back this spring, that is not going to be a ... to answer all the questions. There's a long, lengthy process of public dialogue that's going to 33 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 happen. It may take a year or two. To kind of tie, there's an element or framework part of the comprehensive plan that we want to take up with the community too, so we're not going to rezone anything based on that information within the next couple months. It might be a year... so I don't know what this developer's timeframe is... They want to rezone something. What I can do is the people that are interested... and ready to move forward now, providing them the option that, for development. We did explore those in detail. I believe we communicated the intent to try to tie those in and tried to work to the best... And again, they have the right to pursue ... so everybody works together and then the other property that everybody work, we work to locate a park on the property which there's a little bit of angst but we have ... park located down there. Neighborhood park. Worked on all the other connections... trying to make so everybody ties together so. Sacchet: One concern that this raises for me, and there are a couple of places in the city where we run into a dead end street that was never acknowledged from the other side. What, I mean what's the likely, what's the possibility of something like that happening? I mean I know they're planning a stub there and a place, that makes sense for this development. That makes sense in terms of the overall flow that we perceive at this point for this area. Is there a possibility then of on the other site, a project comes along and says well we're not connecting to this because it doesn't fit for us? Aanenson: That's our job to look at that and your job is to make a recommendation to the City Council of connecting those. I mean that is our number one issue that we face when we bring in a project, connecting neighborhoods. Sacchet: Absolutely. Aanenson: ...for example the construction access and the like, there might be some people that want to go to a use that's desirable that's on that property to the north ... so it swings both ways. There's advantages... and that's the kind of balance. Sacchet: Ahight, thanks Kate. Aanenson: Certainly we haven't ruled out trying to work with them. Sacchet: And I would certainly think that staff tries to work with everybody. Aanenson: Right, and the complexity is, this is the best site we believe for the road. The complexity is we're also working with ... wooded wetland replacement, which is unique. And MnDot's obligated ... so we've kind of have to seize that opportunity while we're working through that permitting process while that's open, so we have to resolve those issues in a timely manner too so we don't lose that option. To have a one way in and one way out, even on that other circulation, it's still a long one way in and one way out. It's certainly the best desired... Sacchet: Alright. I saw somebody else wanted to come up. Actually two other people. Which one goes first is the question. 34 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Jim Benshoof. Chairman, members of the commission. Again Jim Benshoof. Just a couple of brief points. I think I heard you Mr. Chair express concern about, oh about long dead end streets or interconnecting neighborhoods, Kate as well. Just want to say, and I firmly agree that long dead end streets are not good, and not for public safety. For use by residents in the neighborhood. I agree with that. I agree with the principle of interconnecting neighborhoods. I want to make that clear. But I also, I'd like to also really make clear for you that this, the idea of this connection is not simply call it a neighborhood street interconnection. This level of traffic that would be using this street, to and from the Liberty Creekside development, is higher than what call it a normal neighborhood interconnecting local street would carry, and I just think important because with it's proximity to Powers, to the 312 interchange, I'm quite certain that that's going to carry the bulk of the traffic. 60-70 percent of the traffic in and out you know of this neighborhood, and so it would just pose a burden on this Fox property, call it greater than what would normally be associated with neighborhood interconnecting streets. Aanenson: Mr. Chair, can I ask a question? Sacchet: Please. Aanenson: If this was to become a commercial center, and all that property to the south was all commercial, would your premise change? Jim Benshoof. It would be, I would look at it differently, indeed. Sacchet: It would be desirable at that point. Jim Benshoof. It's the relationship of such a street and the use of the street to... Aanenson: ...commercial. Sacchet: Yeah, appreciate it. Good evening. Rick Dorsey: Good evening. My name's Rick Dorsey, 1551 Lyman Boulevard. Couple comments I want to make. First, we have every intention of trying to put together the best development possible for our properties. Our property represents 110 acres between the Fox's and our own. It's a very significant parcel and it's location has created difficulties for us how to look at it. It is preliminary guided as low density residential. That probably came about because of the property that my family owns on it. Not a normal property. Again I'll point out that you probably didn't know that, or know this property existed on that property. You know we're looking at tremendous cost to us because this property will probably be lost. It's a 2 'h to 3 million dollar home. Why will it be lost? Because the traffic is changing what can actually be done with the property. 12.200 cars is not a neighborhood parkway coming through. It's as much or more traffic than is on Lyman. I guess you call it a A minor collector. Not collector, excuse me arterial. That's a county road. This is a neighborhood. Now the big question that comes into play is the whole process. No, we haven't been communicated with. No one has ever called me up to talk about anything. I don't believe the Fox's have been called up to be included in discussions. We've not talked with Town and Country from them calling us up, 35 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting— March 21, 2006 other than meeting them at meetings. It does have an impact and we're trying to work with it. The first thing we've got to do is try and protect what we have. 12,000 cars is a lot of cars. We've talked about with staff and about an idea, and that's what it is. Right at this point you know I hear staff saying, or Kate saying you know we'd like to see commercial. Well we're looking at what the options are when you have Lyman Boulevard with 12,000 cars, Powers with 14,000 cars, the east/west collector at 12,000 cars. You know you've got to look at some other alternatives. We're open to trying to do something. Right at this point we can't do commercial because the city won't look at it, so it's not that we're holding things up until the study comes back, it won't even be considered. We've put forth time and a plan to give an idea of what we're looking at. This isn't to say that this is what it will be. But if you look at it, we're looking at contributing substantial amounts of land to make park area within the development. Make it a. Sacchet: Can you explain... Rick Dorsey: Pardon me? Sacchet: Do you mind explaining the colors on your. Rick Dorsey: Well what we initially looked at, until we get the study back we don't know what possibilities are there but it'd be a mixed use type development. The initial plan was to focus on some sort of commercial in this area. But at this time. Sacchet: The red would be the commercial? Rick Dorsey: Well possibly. Sacchet: Well concept. Understood. This is dreaming. It's brainstorming. Rick Dorsey: Yep, it's dreaming. Exactly. Could be more of it. Could be the whole thing. We don't know yet until we get information back, but trying to do something that's balanced. That has possibilities, we put this together to look at road use and issues. These areas would be residential in this scenario, and the idea was that it's an internal parkway with walking paths through the whole thing. Our goal was to minimize road traffic through it, and in doing so make it an area where people could go from any one of these points without crossing traffic, to the point of installing a bridge where water would go underneath it because the traffic's so heavy and you can't get across. That basically goes to the point of before this road was here, this was one big parcel. With the road here of 12,000 cars, it doesn't connect neighborhoods. It disconnects them. And so we've been looking at, if we have to go with the residential ways to connect it back up. Now to make any of this work requires higher density. We don't want to look at projects like townhome projects. There's a lot of them in the area. We would think we'd have to go vertical somehow to do it. Incorporate commercial to try to bring people to vertical developments because there aren't any in Chanhassen. You know there's a lot of factors that are there, but at this point in time we can't move forward. Now the idea of a road coming through, you know if this was mixed use, sure it could work. However, if it ends up being residential, again the traffic further breaks up any theme we're trying to create with this and create continuity of neighborhoods. Now we understand that they do need to have some sort of access. We'd like 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 to work with them. We truly would like to sit down and talk to them and work through and not have to throw ideas out for them. We're not looking at having to generate, solve all their problems, which is their solving their problem creates a problem for us. And I do understand that you know yes, you do have to go forward and figure something out to provide access. This property was landlocked originally and you know whether the south is an issue or not, we don't know. You know something that could be revisited as an option, just so we know all the options. The other thing that comes into play is really on this site we believe that there's going to be a problem with traffic and confusion and with traffic coming out here, coming up here and the plan that is different again from what was approved by City Council for design showed this north collector going here. It's looking like from the way they stopped it now, and my understanding is last week at the meeting they said it's flexible, but that it was going to come around here and up this way. That creates two intersections. We believe it, as Jim was mentioning, perhaps an alignment more straight would create a four way intersection and eliminate some of the problems that are there. Our goal in doing that would be to mitigate some of the traffic. So somebody wanting to do to downtown to shop, instead of coming up here and out here or coming out through here, this neighborhood, there's an option. Maybe coming up here and up, or up here to Audubon and up. So we'd like to talk about these options and the impact that they have on our property as well. We're not first to the table. My property's in ag preserve. I might, all this money I'm spending right now might be totally worthless, but I'm trying to. Larson: Where is the property that you showed us on this map? Rick Dorsey: Right here. And you know, I mean with the guidance that was there, you know low density, you know with the traffic, no it probably doesn't make sense. Medium density, if you're having a house like this with medium density around it, my property is worthless. So we're looking at trying to come up with solutions with what's being dealt to us. And we would like to work together on this. The neighborhoods, they can put in what they want. We're not asking that but in this scenario here, these are just outlining off of, this would be the north collector and there's some issues as far as where that can line up on Lyman and we've hired Mr. Benshoof's company to help us determine that and there are very limited locations where that can access. And it appears that they have to be between the creek and actually my property line to meet sight line standards. We feel that that is a big issue. It has an impact on this development as well because of where the traffic will go to site that, before we take an move on. It can have an impact if we can work out something here where this is a more straight alignment coming up, and we've been told well that it's too steep. Well, you know this all here where this is being built is way steeper. Believe me. And cutting into the side of the hill here could be a possibility to tie that up. Perhaps this is 2 roads coming out. I don't know. Another different solution possibly if we could sit down and talk about them. Sacchet: Yes, it's tricky. I mean we've got to be careful that we don't plan somebody else's stuff. I mean that's what your concerned in your case of the impact, so you've got to be careful also on how far you go with that. Rick Dorsey: Yeah, and we've, I mean we want to have some flexibility to try and put some sort of a project together. Our belief is that this property, because of this intersection for the city is probably the most valuable as far as tax base to the city. We do believe that commercial is 37 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 probably the best use for it. That's something yet to be determined whether the city wants to do it or not. Sacchet: Or mixed, yeah. Rick Dorsey: You know wants to do it, but if it is that type of use, it can be a great possibility. Short of doing that, I've got to be on the defensive and hope you can appreciate that. 12,000 cars going by this house is not anything I'm looking forward to. The possibilities of commercial, if the city would come forth and say hey it's not just a possibility, we'll do it. Our attitude would be different. But we're not faced with that option yet. We have to wait until the information comes forth and maybe 2 years down the road to find this out. So what we're looking at is basically to look at a couple of key things. Number one is, I think there has to be a definitive location on Lyman determined so we know where the north collector's going to go and how it's going to interact with this east/west road. And if it has to be over here somewhere, should these two line up or should they be separated, because that is an issue traffic wise. And I mean that's number one. Number two is just looking at it from the standpoint of the comprehensive plan. Comprehensive plan states that it's got policies in place to minimise environmental and traffic impacts on neighborhoods. My neighborhood's being impacted. My property's being impacted. Now there are ways to mitigate this traffic and to take it through design right now to take and try to move it out to the arterials where it belongs. Why is it coming through the east/west collector? Because the City has decided they don't want to spend money at this time to upgrade Audubon and Lyman. If those were upgraded according to the AUAR, this collector wouldn't have to be there right now. Sometime in the future, but not right now. So there's certainly things that can be looked at, discussed. We would like to take some time now to do it and sit down with the other property owners and work through you know what can work. We're willing to compromise. I think we've already compromised in looking at having 12,000 cars come through when it didn't have to be that way necessarily. So yes, we would like to work with everybody involved. We would like to see everybody involved. Have great developments because it benefits everybody. And to end there, you know I would ask that the commission recognize that we have to look at the whole plan since we're looking at this as a whole area. Not cherry pick and pull out little pieces of it and put it together. I agree with Commissioner McDonald. You know this area, we don't know it's commercial yet. If the City would tell us it's commercial, you know we can move forward. Until such time, or at least give us some guidance saying this is what we believe. This is the direction, you know we support you. Not we're going to wait and you know we sit there and it comes through and then we're stuck having to try and figure it out. That's what we ask is fairness. Sacchet: Appreciate your comments. Thank you very much. Undestad: Can I ask you one question? Sacchet: Yes, go ahead Mark. Undestad: What's the green area at the bottom? M 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Rick Dorsey: That's the tree preserve that we've all been talking about. The hill of trees. And in actuality. Undestad: The yellow. The yellow right at the edge of the trees there. Rick Dorsey: Well potentially a district, be it residential, whatever. A quadrant that's looking to how you'd service those roads. Undestad: How close is your tree line there to what's actually out there? Rick Dorsey: I don't understand your question. Undestad: Where you're showing your green, your dark green line comes through the yellow there. Rick Dorsey: Ask the question again please. Undestad: I'm just trying to get an idea of coming up from the street below. Rick Dorsey: From down here? Undestad: Yep. Where they want to send it up. Rick Dorsey: Yeah. There's no trees past the Fox property line. Undestad: Now I'm looking over to your. Rick Dorsey: This way? Sacchet: To the yellow. Undestad: Other way. Rick Dorsey: This way? Undestad: Yeah, now follow your tree line. Just come down. Rick Dorsey: Over here? Undestad: Yep, all the way down to there, yep. Rick Dorsey: Well that's what Jeff was talking about. There's actually a few isolated trees of any consequence that are out in those areas. The question would be is, are they actually part of the preserve and what constitutes a preserve area. Certainly a few trees here and there, I mean trees are being taken out on this project and we understand that it's a preserve area and the Fox's are respecting that and at the same time we've got to work and look and see what can be done to 39 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 make the best use of the property without destroying it so, I mean that's what we are looking at. We've very conscious of it. My property's been in the ag preserve since 1982. At the request of the City we did take it out. You know we are wanting to work with everybody. We're not trying to hold everything up, but I hope you can appreciate that we have significant economic value there that we do need to protect. Sacchet: Definitely, thank you very much sir. Just two questions or clarification from staff. That east/west collector, I mean that was one of the major elements in the AUAR study. I think that is a firm decision. I mean that's. Aanenson: Correct, and there was numerous meetings with the property owners and different iterations on that drawing. Sacchet: So that's not a discussion point at this point. Aanenson: Correct. Sacchet: That's been discussed a year or more ago. Aanenson: The council has ordered the plans and specs. Sacchet: Then in terms of the impact, I mean of course we want to look at the overall picture but then from the overall picture we work into the more details. And we're quite into details with this particular application in front of us. And so we already went through these steps to my understanding, that at this point to some extent are being questioned. Aanenson: Correct. Sacchet: Okay. And that I mean these discussions have been going on for quite a while. Okay. Alright. Public hearing is still open. Anybody else wants to add anything more to this. Seeing nobody getting up, I'll close the public hearing. Bring it back to the commission for discussion and comments. And at some point a vote. Debbie, are you ready? Larson: I'll jump in. Sacchet: Go ahead. Larson: Okay. Do you have, we've got some you know the last thing that you showed us Mr. Dorsey, I'm just you know looking at that and I'm wondering you know, you've got a gorgeous property there. Beautiful home. Is the plan to put more large homes and just a few? I mean I guess I'm a little confused as to what the huge concern is. Rick Dorsey: To answer your question, we don't know. You know the reason why we don't know, first of all at this point in time, with the traffic that's coming through, we don't find it feasible to put in large homes. Would you want to build a large home on a highway? No. 40 0 • Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Larson: I grew up in LA. They do it all the time. Really big homes. Rick Dorsey: Well in the Twin Cities that's less desirable if you have the option. Larson: Yeah, I understand that. Rick Dorsey: Okay. So you know that takes it out of the picture somewhat, and we recognize that now. The other options that are there in place today would be medium density. Again what happens there, you know there's issues that are there. We still have busy roads. You have to give somebody a reason even with multi family to want to live when they have other options. There can be a thousand other townhomes around us that are not on a busy road, or as busy of a road. So from our perspective in looking at it, marketing times, if we were to bring them on the market today and compete with these others, same price point, you wouldn't sell them probably. You have to provide some other reason for them to want to be there. Sacchet: Got to be optimistic. Rick Dorsey: Well I'm being realistic. I'm being realistic. Sacchet: Understand. You're protecting your interest. Rick Dorsey: Well I'm being realistic. I'm optimistic, yes I think it can be a great development but things can happen... Sacchet: Let's try to stick with the project. Yeah, let's stick with the project. Rick Dorsey: Well to finish your question. Larson: Yeah. Rick Dorsey: So do I see in the future big home there? With 12,000 cars, no. Larson: Or what do you see? I mean. Rick Dorsey: What do I see? If, right at this point, and this is based on market. People coming to us saying we'd like to build something there. We're seeing more demand for commercial use. No doubt about it. Because of the interchange there. The distance from coming onto 312 from Eden Prairie, all the way out to Chaska, there will be no other sizeable parcels of land available, and they see the demographics. Well, that's a possibility but it's up to you to tell us. Until such time we can't do that. We only have the opportunity to do single family or multi family. Sacchet: I think we understand your situation. Thank you very much. Appreciate you clarifying that but let's keep it to the commission at this point so we try to get this. Larson: Okay, I'm done. 41 0 • Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Sacchet: It's alright, keep going. Larson: I'll stop. Sacchet: I don't want to cut you off. You can keep going. Larson: No, no, that was it. Sacchet: Mark. Undestad: I'd just you know one comment on that. Again the issues on, it looks to me like there would be some options in there. And when these developments come through, these roads have to go somewhere. They all do. And I think to go through this they try to find an area that okay, this makes the most sense. I think on their parcels there, that there probably is some more options to tighten up that radius if for some reason they just said you know we just don't want it coming in here. But that's the process that staff has to work out with the remaining land owners. It's okay, where is this road going to go? It's going to go somewhere. But exactly where is it going to go? That's what they still need to work out. Sacchet: And there are access points defined. I mean that's where we started this whole thing with. There was an east and a west access point that has to be connected. Aanenson: Just to be clear, since you met last we have made that determination and we've gone through those iterations. We do believe this is the best so, again ... we believe is the best. Sacchet: So there's flexibility in that but in general the concept is very worked out. Aanenson: Correct. Undestad: So again coming back to their project in front of us, the issue of the road ending where it ends. Sacchet: Is a given at this point. Undestad: Is a given. That's where it's going to be and then it's still to be determined which way it's going to go. Aanenson: Exactly. Undestad: You know where you'd like to see it. They know where they'd like to see it. That still has to get worked out. Sacchet: Okay. Anything else Mark? 42 0 • Planning Commission Meeting— March 21, 2006 Undestad: Just back to the, do you have something on that, you know the different paint jobs for signs or something out there. It didn't sound like you had anything other than this is what we're doing up the road. Sacchet: That's a tricky one, that one. I mean how much can we on one hand tell them what they have to do but on the other hand it is a PUD with the idea that we do have a say in this. So there is a give and take so I think we're within our rights to push that issue. Dan. Keefe: Well I think there's a number of things that I liked from this project. Definitely I think that they've added a lot of trees in the landscaping too and I think they've gone way over the minimums that are required, which I think is terrific. I think I'm happy that they also moved forward adjusting that retaining walls from 30 foot high one, four down to the lower level and certain tiering them. I'm also pleased with the alignment of the trails. Trail going along the Bluff Creek corridor and how the sidewalks tie into the trail. I think that's very positive. I agree that in terms of articulation, as much as you can in regards to the buildings, if we can enhance that articulation and provide as much variety as possible with ... limited somewhat given the price points. To be able to articulate and add a lot of architectural flavor to it but I would recommend the developer look at that a little bit more. And then last thing in regards to the road, I mean you know we've gone through this question a number of times and I'm in support of connecting neighborhoods. I think it's consistent with our comprehensive plan to connect neighborhoods. I trust that staff has looked at the different options and where the best location of the road is in terms of this particular neighborhood. How it goes into the other neighborhood, how it traverses through the other neighborhood, really remains to be seen but in terms of where it stubs in, stubs out of this particular property, it seems to be appropriate from my standpoint. I'm in support of this project. Sacchet: Okay. Jerry. McDonald: Well let me just say I'm a little conflicted. First of all, I'd like to address what I consider to be a non -issue that we spent a lot of time on and that's the roads as to where they go. Staff has been mandated to take care of the roads. We have entry points and exit points, and it's up to them to connect it. I think the developer's well aware of the controversy of the roads. You know he's made a commitment for the stub. If something doesn't happen, that's his risk. I don't see those as being issues in our decision. What's before us. Having said that, I would feel more comfortable if this matter were tabled, and the reason I would feel more comfortable if it were tabled is that I would like more assurances about the design. I heard what the developer said. We have gone through a lot about diversity of neighborhoods and uniqueness of neighborhoods and I guess I just do not feel comfortable that that's what I'm getting here. I mean I'm sorry but that's the way I feel and again, you know I preference all of that with I have the greatest respect for the developer of this project. I really wouldn't want to see anybody else in there but I just feel let down on this issue, and I mean based upon that, I have a problem supporting voting for this development. That's why I would prefer to see it tabled and I would prefer, you know we did get some commitment from the developer to work with staff to do something about the schemes. I would like to see some more time spent doing that because once we make the commitment to approve this, that's it. We never see it again and you know one of the things that the Planning Commission needs to look at is, we have made determinations about what our 43 0 • Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 guidelines are as far as making approvals and I'm afraid that I just do not feel that that guideline, that I have enough assurances on that. So my position, you know what I will recommend whenever he gets to it is, I'll make a motion to table because I really feel that this needs to be looked at a little bit more. This is a big issue. And again, this has nothing to do with the roads. I want to make that very clear that I do not feel that that is an issue of this development. I feel staff has been mandated to take care of that, and they are doing that and City Council is on top of that. We spent a lot of time last week at the City Council meeting discussing this road so, and again I don't want to come across as somewhat of a hypocrite from the standpoint of I do support property rights and I understand what the developers of that property are going through, but we have a developer with property who is ready to go and I think that one of the things that we as a city owe them is a decision on what they ask for. I am saying we need to table it because I am not satisfied with the internals of the development, and that is the reason I cannot support this. So having said that I'll tum it over to the chairman. Sacchet: Thanks Jerry. I do agree to a large extent. I certainly agree that the traffic, the road thing I think has been pretty well cooked. There are questions in terms of the use next to it that I understand is difficult for those adjacent property owners because they don't quite know if they're going to go left or right, but that's a different issue. That's not tied into this particular development. I do agree with you Jerry that in terms of the diversity of this, it's not where I'd like to see it. I think it was an issue from the very beginning. I think it was actually the first issue when even though it was in the discussion stage when this came in that we pointed out well, can we do some diversity from what's happening across the hill. I do acknowledge you made an effort. You come up with the color palettes. With the additional touches on it. I think that's very commendable. Is it enough? I mean we're still basically following cookie cutter option with a little extra glazing on it. I'm not sure whether this is a reason to table and hold it up though. I've got to be honest about that. It's certainly not to my satisfaction. It's not where I'd like to see it, and I'm struggling because if it were not a PUD I would say we're out of our league by getting involved with that because that's the developer's right to do it how they want to do it and it's not up to us as the governing body as the city to come in and say you have to do it this and that. We can make suggestions say put a cupola there and the maybe they do. But then on the other hand what I hear you say Jerry, if we at this point say work with staff, chances are not much is going to happen because they've already worked on it. Let's face it. I mean I would assume from their angle they went as far as they're comfortable going with the diversity, and within the price point, what you brought up Dan. I think something we need to consider too, and they do have the formula that they're successful with, so we can't expect them to deviate from their success formula. How they make their living, right? So I'm a little conflicted there exactly how do we resolve that. I don't know whether maybe. McDonald: Well I think Mr. Chairman, I mean the thing that I'm looking for is that, again we're not trying to ram a design down anyone's throat. We've been through this before, but we've been through it at Liberty at Bluff Creek. We had problems there with the way that it was, the colors. The schemes. The facades and everything. The only leverage we have to give to city staff is to say table the issue. We're not going to vote on it and send it up. Without that we have no leverage and staff has no leverage, and my concern is again, working with this developer that has worked before. They are willing to work with you. I don't think I'm asking a lot to let's get a little bit of uniqueness. If it's color. If it's &;ade changes. We've been through this before 1-9 0 • Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 and they did come through but the only way we have any leverage is to get it back to staff and let them say, we've got to get this fixed and then we can resubmit it. That's the only thing I guess I'm looking at is, without that you're right. It goes forward and I don't think it will ever be discussed again. Sacchet: So let me, go ahead. Keefe: I've got a question to ask Jerry. You know there are development design standards that are laid out for this particular PUD, right? Liberty at Creekside development standards. They're listed on page 5, and I guess the only question is, did they not meet the building materials and design standards as stated in here? McDonald: It's the aesthetics. It's the aesthetics. It's not the materials. It's the look and the feel of it, and that's part of, whenever we say we want unique neighborhoods, that's... Keefe: What one person likes, is totally different what somebody else likes. McDonald: And again, I am not saying that we're doing anything with design. We've had this discussion before. We had it about Liberty on Bluff Creek and what we agreed on is, we're not trying to design houses. What we're trying to get is a feel that is unique. Well we turned it over to staff before. They came back. They worked on it. They got something unique. At that point they made a decision that it works. That's what we want and that's what I'm saying again is, give it back to staff but you need to give them some leverage. Sacchet: That's a good point, but this area that I'm a little fuzzy and I ask you first Jerry since you bring the idea, and then maybe also address to staff. I mean we've given them this direction to bring in diversity. They come with five color schemes. They come with additional materials. Additional sidings, what have you. Rock. Brick and so forth. Gables. I don't know how far they went with it. Kevin Clark: We changed elevations. We came with multiple... Sacchet: So my question to you Jerry is, what more? Keefe: We need to be very specific. Sacchet: I mean what more can, let's say we table this. What more can they bring to us without taking the whole apart, which I don't think we can ask them to come with a you know. Keefe: ... materials. McDonald: Well I guess what I'm saying in all this is, I asked the question of staff you know and I do not get the feeling that they're satisfied with this. That they feel there is some more that could be done. Sacchet: So let's ask staff. What more could be done? U1 0 • Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Aanenson: If you go back to what we approved for final plat in the Liberty, there's actually a plan. There's no two buildings that sit next to each other with the same color palette and that was approved as a part of it, and I believe Shawn ... here tonight, so there's different color stone, brick. There's no material theme that, buildings that are next to each other so within that, not only in that but we also mix up the diversity. Now because of the slopes and the grades, we have more similar products on Creekside, but we would do the same thing here, which would be no similar color product, so and that's approved with the final plat. The color schemes so when they come in for the building permit, so there's no, yes. If you're saying the concern is this is going to look like the other one. That I can't do anything about. But within the product itself there's diversity so when you're looking at it it's not all the same look, color, feel within the product. McDonald: Well that's not what I heard the applicant say because the question was asked about the colors and the way all this goes together, and the particular product line. I'm not sure if it's. Keefe: See if they can show us something. They weren't able to use their slide show... Undestad: Is that the same paint colors that they used on the other one that's used on this one? Sacchet: If we can find something specific that can be added, that'd be good but without it. Aanenson: Not every one of these units are going to be the same materials. So some of these will be brick. This one is showing brick. So the one that we just approved on last Monday night, there's some of these are going to be the boulders. They all have different color palettes so there's not the same look. Now your question I believe is mixing it up within each unit. That's more. Larson: Well no, not with each one unit. With each two. I mean like on this one, a logical split would be between the two. I mean in the four. Kevin Clark: I think what we're saying is that what we went to the extent is we offer what we have three elevations that we're doing. Three different. Sacchet: Designs of the. Kevin Clark: Architectural designs, and between those different designs, whether it's, I'm at a loss now for the different names but the different architectural looks of these buildings, we've set that color palette for those because it just doesn't look good on a streetscape to create a building that has that alternating color. Undestad: Are they the same color palettes on this as on? Kevin Clark: We would be implementing the same color palette. Undestad: So all the paint colors, everything is the same. L] Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 0 Kevin Clark: But within diversity within the neighborhood. Now I'm saying we could probably go back and supplement. Maybe we could look at other, adding some other ones. Adding some others to supplement this. Aanenson: Want to clarify again just to make sure we're all on the same page. So within this project itself, there's different fagade treatments, so that's one variety. There's three. Kevin Clark: They're actually, with this, on that elevation, with that look of building, there will be a minimum of three different color scenarios that can happen. But then there are additional, two additional elevations that also have diversity. Aanenson: So there's color diversity and there's architectural. Kevin Clark: Architectural diversity. Larson: But this isn't the one that troubles me. It's the other one that looks like a row house. It's the long, the 8 units. Kevin Clark: Well it is. It's a three story. Shawn Siders: It's intended to be row houses. Larson: And that one has the colors on it but the picture I have doesn't. Aanenson: Right, but there's also different color palettes for each of those too... Kevin Clark: Correct, and that's what lays out is within this one. Larson: Okay. Okay, it looks like a motel. Shawn Siders: Commissioner Larson what you have in front of you as well is just an illustrative example of what we often hand out just for, just to show somebody what that particular project looks like, so I apologize for any confusion with that, but that's kind of why we provided that. Just for illustration. Larson: Alright. 47 0 . Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Aanenson: So those are two that we're looking at, and you'd be approving. And then within that, there's different architecture detail and the different color detail. So your direction for us is to work with them to give you some other color palettes... McDonald: Well I guess let me ask this question, because I maybe misread a little bit of what you were saying. Are you, I mean we have given you direction as staff that we would like to see diversity, so you go out and you work with developers and you try to come up with that. Is it your position that you feel comfortable enough with this that you feel that you've met that requirement and where there's maybe still some things to do, you can work with this developer and make those changes to get to a point where there is uniqueness within this neighborhood, because I'm not seeing it. I have to be truthful. Now you're talking about different facades and everything and maybe what it is, it's just the drawings that you've supplied us because those are the same ones that I saw up at Liberty at Bluff Creek. If you're telling me that's not really what we're going to put down here. It's a little bit different, that's probably okay. Sacchet: Do you want to address that? McDonald: I'm confused so help me out. Kevin Clark: You know we are proposing the same products that we are doing in Liberty at Bluff Creek. But I think the context that I want to put it in is that, as we work with staff and with the city management, we've also worked through a number of issues. Accepting additional fees for the Lyman Boulevard upgrade. $2,400 an acre. Working with staff and creating the trail corridor. We, as I mentioned, working through and dedicating sufficient property as outlots or conservative areas. Improving the mitigation. The landscaping, so there has been give and take, but I guess our position is, that we don't feel that we could move into this neighborhood and create an entire new line, if that's what you're asking me because that's not feasible. McDonald: No. Sacchet: We understand. Kevin Clark: And I just want to make sure that that's not the direction you think we can go in, because that's not going to happen. McDonald: No. No, and I wouldn't ask that. Aanenson: While Mr. Clark was talking about the plans ... which we don't always get, we did work through, since you met last, we worked through 3 or 4 different designs which they showed us again in good faith, some single family. Some other type of products and what would work. Why it wouldn't work. ...why it wouldn't work and how they eventually ended up back to a certain number of units and a park site, and that's how we got back there, so there was an exercise of a couple different... McDonald: I guess if you're going to ask me for a definition of what I'm trying to get at. 48 0 • Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Keefe: We are. McDonald: I want to be able to go into this neighborhood and look at a house and then go down to Liberty at Bluff Creek and I can't find it. I want to see some kind of uniqueness. Sacchet: Distinction. McDonald: Distinction, yeah. That's a good word. Distinction between the two areas. 'That's what I'm searching for, or else at this point now all we're creating is just one big long development full of townhouses that are all the same. And that's not what the community here is all about. We do not have these large land masses of houses that are identical as far as developments. You have, you know maybe 40 acres and they'll go in and do things, and then there's unique. Well, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. Tell me. Keefe: Lundgren Brothers. Aanenson: I think some people... Lundgren Brothers, they have a lot of similar looking. I guess what we looked at too, we looked at the, the other two projects that are coming in. The other two subdivisions that are coming in are single family detached. And as I worked through them before, they're different applications but they're very similar in the fact that both of those are predominantly two story homes. I think they're almost all two story homes. So you're going to have a lot of two story homes right in the middle. Single family, by the way. Detached homes. Keefe: And that's between these two. Aanenson: Correct. One will be on the Degler parcel and the other one will be on Mr. Sever Peterson's parcel, correct. Keefe: What is on the west side of this particular parcel? How does the land go on the west side? Aanenson: I think they showed that... Kevin Clark: That cross section where down into the first tier and then down to the creek. Keefe: ... drive along, where are you going to drive and what are you going to see? Kevin Clark: Well coming out of Liberty on Bluff Creek, you're going to come through the neighborhood, off of Audubon. Onto a divided boulevard. A landscaped boulevard. To that round about where you're going to head north. Come down into the lowlands or into the creek bed. As you come back out, you'll have to take a right turn to head now southeast into this neighborhood. They're going to be separated by what, shy of a quarter of a mile. As you come out of one into the other. This neighborhood elevated further away and sheltered really by the existing topography. I don't see a continuum of the two neighborhoods, although I respectfully understand what you're saying and if you're saying, can you, are you going to be able to, with what we've proposed here tonight, walk in and say I don't see that at the other neighborhood. GLS 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 No, we haven't achieved that goal, if that's your goal. That's not going to he the case. We are proposing the same, two of the products that are going to be built in the Liberty on Bluff Creek neighborhood. What we do offer is that we've done the best job we can over the last year, considering that when we were here last was in August, so in the ... working up to there and then working through the design issues. Working through all the other more let's say structural issues to make it a viable project. Working with the city along with our commitment to the assessments on the collector road, to the ever evolving design of the collector road. To additional requirements that we've been, that have been proposed to us that we've agreed to, so I think we, along with the city, and along with yourselves, as this project has evolved, have made commitments but can everything change? I think that's when Mr. Dorsey got up and we talked about a number of things. It's interesting the evolution. One of the first meetings we had, and we've had many, and there's always been opportunity for contact. He's right, we've never directly called him but we've always been available. We've had numerous hallway meetings. Numerous meetings that were called here. Always available for contact if there was an issue that needed to be discussed, but I think one of the earliest projects, other than us, Town and Country getting involved with the Bemardi's, really started at the Fox property with U.S. Homes back at the onset of this when they were looking at different things, so it's interesting. I only bring that up from an evolutionary standpoint, that everybody's been working on it and we've been making progress and staying into the program to make this thing happen. I guess my point was, at one of the earlier meetings someone said well can somebody general contract this? Is there a possibility for somebody to maybe you know, take this whole thing on? And we all kind of looked at each other and said you know boy, that'd be nice but we understand reality again that none of us really operate in that environment. That world doesn't exist, so the challenges are that we work our best plan. We represent ourselves honestly and with integrity. We work towards that common goal, and we deal with the pinch points as they come. That happened to us when the collector road morphed. It was initially going across the Peterson property, and then it was decided that it needed to kind of split the baby and go directly north and that modified the whole plan of Liberty on Bluff Creek. I think there have been a number of those things that have occurred throughout the process. Big portion of that was architecture. Architecture. Colors. Highlights on the buildings. Orientation. Anti -monotony. And I think we've done a serious and concerted job to meet those obligations. Can we maybe meet them all at every point? No, and I guess that's what I want to honestly represent to you tonight, that maybe that's something that Commissioner McDonald we're not going to be able to completely handle for you this evening. McDonald: Well I appreciate your honesty, and again as I said, I appreciate the fact of your willingness to work with staff. At this point it doesn't do any good I guess to try to give staff leverage for something they evidently don't want. Aanenson: No. If you direct us to try to do that, we can do that. I'm not saying that. If you want us to do that, to try to get different products. I think it's not with the staff. It's the developer saying, he's unwilling to change and we had that. We went through the different versions, so I guess the question is really back to the developer if they want to. _ . Sacchet: I'm still not clear. I mean you're not asking for a different product are you Jerry? McDonald: No. I'm just asking for a different look. U1I 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Undestad: That would be a different product. Aanenson: It'd be a different product. Kevin Clark: If you're asking me to create new elevations, that's what I'm saying I'm not willing to do. I'm not willing to go out and redesign the product again. Keefe: And commission another architect and... Kevin Clark: No. I just can't do that. It just doesn't support that. Aanenson: ... Liberty project and with the intent that that would be the next... Keefe: A lot of money to do that. McDonald: No, I'm not asking you to do that. Kevin Clark: Well I guess that's... exactly what you are asking because maybe we're, this is a faux disagreement because we really don't disagree. McDonald: I guess you know one of the problems is that's always difficult about this is, when we receive things and we have meetings, I mean I would love to have more time to discuss things, and again it could be that I am just not interpreting what I'm seeing correctly. I will give you that, and you're right. Maybe we don't, do not have a disagreement. I guess that's, and you're right, at this point you can't convince me one way or the other, and I'm not going to convince you, but I'm not going to ask you to redesign, and if that's what I'm doing, then of course I'm not going to ask to table it and direct staff to go back to you and do that because that's not the point of this so. Undestad: Yeah, if you can do it with colors. McDonald: Yeah, I'm perfectly fine with colors. I'm just looking at something that is unique. That's all I'm asking for and it's not, I'm not asking for big changes or you know big changes in the elevation or, I mean we did this before with, you came at Liberty at Bluff Creek. I think you had two color schemes and staff asked for more. You provided that. You know, that's all I'm asking for is something small. I'm not asking for you to redesign new elevations or anything such as that. I'm perfectly happy with a little bit different color scheme. Kevin Clark: To supplement the ones we have so that we can get a greater diversity of that. McDonald: If that's something that both staff and you feel that you can work with and give it a good effort, then I don't see any point in holding anything up. Kevin Clark: Okay, thank you. 51 0 • Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 McDonald: Thank you. Sacchet: Yeah, I'd like to push our discussion this side a little bit. I think we got good input from here. Let's here a little bit more from you guys. Larson: I sort of scribbled something here on the back. It's a very minor change, and how do I do this? Can I show these? I mean I don't know bow to go about this but, really basically what I did with my pen is I made, rather than the siding all going sideways like this. Kevin Clark: Do you want me to put it up here? Larson: No, because it's ugly. Just minor. It's not a huge deal. It could be the same color or slightly different or just even taking the siding, rather than going straight across, have this one be straight. That way, you know. Just minor so it breaks it up. Sacchet: What Debbie is explaining, just so everybody's with us is like we're looking at the back elevation of the, what's that one called? The Concord. The back of the Concord, which is really a pretty bland view. And what she's suggesting is that we have some color variation between one or two unit groupings, possibly texture, where the siding, the slats do the different direction, just to give it a little bit of distinction, so it doesn't just look like this row of chicken coops. Larson: It would not be a change of materials other than a color or a slight difference in how it's, I don't know. Aanenson: I'm not opposed to that but I think the back of the building has the least amount of visibility. Kevin Clark: Yeah, we've put all our architecture on the front. Aanenson: Especially in this location. Kevin Clark: We put all the stone and brick on the full front. On the sides. Sacchet: You don't see much of the back. Kevin Clark: You don't see the back. These are just like your homes. If you go out and look at, go out and stand in the back yard, look at your own home. You don't have shutters. You have one color. I mean the majority of the houses. Larson: The back of my home is beautiful. Kevin Clark: I can imagine. Larson: It is. 52 0 • Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Kevin Clark: But the back of the house, the walkout, the rear part of the house is not where you put the architecture. You're putting the architecture in the look. Larson; I'm not saying change the architecture. Kevin Clark: No, well it's all, I guess I include that. Sacchet: It's part of the architecture. Kevin Clark: Yeah, it's part of it. It's something that we're now, yeah on these planes here where we're, you're trying to match of different sides. Larson: I'm not even saying it has to be siding. I was just saying like, if you even had a slight variation in color, it gives a little dimension. I don't know, but... I don't care. McDonald: Mr. Chairman. Sacchet: Jerry. McDonald: Would you be willing to accept, I mean you know he's assured me that he's willing to work with staff. They'll come up if there's something that can be done, they'll work through it. They've made the commitment to do something to add some diversity, whether it's color or you know some things such as that. Is that good enough do you think to go ahead and go forward with this? The biggest thing. Larson: Yeah. Sacchet: It's not a need to hold it up. Larson: Of course. I think it's reasonable to go forward but I'm just saying you know, I mean everything that I put out there, which is really not a dollar difference. It's just a mind set of how you want it to look, and it's my mind set versus your's, and I understand that but I'm not the only one that thinks it's boring, as you heard. That's all, and I don't want you to have to go to any more expense. I really don't because I think all and all you've done a nice job. Sacchet: And you focused on the front elevation which is understandable you know. Larson: But you know, I mean are you assuming that these people are never going to go in their back yards and look back? Sacchet: Oh, which one is mine? Larson: Yeah. I don't know, I spend an awful lot of time in my back yard but, that's because I have a beautiful back side to my house. 53 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Kevin Clark: It's a balancing act, I'm not going to deny that. You're working with putting the investment where the investment is recognized and where people will appreciate it on the ... that's really observed from yourself if you drive through the neighborhood a year or two from now, you're going to look at how the neighborhood looks. The streetscape and the massing. And how the colors work together and I guess respectfully commissioners, we rely on design, architectural... Larson: I'm a designer so don't pull that on me. Kevin Clark: But we're also sensitive to the market though. Larson: That's why I'm trying to... Sacchet: Yes, and just to respect your point I mean, and as I said before, we're not trying to prescribe what you have to do. That's your business. But on the other hand we're in a position, we have a responsibility that, and certainly Jerry expressed it very clearly, there's something that we'd like to see go a little further. So the whole point of the discussion is to try to define what exactly is it because you've done a lot. I mean we've acknowledged that. We commend you for that. And so the purpose of this discussion is to get a little more clarity. What is possible, because there's a question. You did a lot already so what more can be done. Now, we came to one possibility, we'll do something on the back. Now we could obviously debate the values of that. I think we're pretty close in agreement that we feel this is not a reason to hold you up, but that we put this as work with staff. That it only makes sense if we have some vision with it. Kevin Clark: Right. Sacchet: I mean if it's, it's still a bit fuzzy exactly what more can be done. Kevin Clark: I think that's a reasonable assignment because I guess being prescriptive from your viewpoint is potentially restrictive or counter intuitive to maybe what we're jointly trying to achieve. McDonald: Yeah, it's putting us in the role of a designer which we don't want to be, and all we're telling you is you know, it's like, it doesn't quite look right. Not sure why but do something because you're the expert, you know. Kevin Clark: Well give us a chance and we'll have a look. McDonald: Okay, and I'm willing to accept your word and commitment that you'll work with staff and we'll give them direction that, to work with you and you know try to do something to fine tune. That's all we're asking. Kevin Clark: Understood. Undestad: Asking for different paint colors or... FYI 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 McDonald: Yeah, even that. Yeah, something as simple as that would probably alleviate any concern I guess. Sacchet: Couple additional color schemes. I mean what fits? Kevin Clark: We'll have a few options. We can look at that and see how best you know. I think we want to look at it and say, which one do we achieve the highest and best goal with. McDonald: Of course. I mean that's why, I can't give you a detail. Sacchet: That's not our role. McDonald: That's right and I don't want to give you but you guys are pushing me for details but no, that's not it. Sacchet: As long as we have clarity a little bit and I think we discussed it about as far as we can. McDonald: I think we're done. It's time to vote then. Sacchet: Alright, thank you very much. Very lively discussion. We haven't had one of those in a while. Larson: Oh yeah, because you were in Switzerland. Sacchet: Oh I missed a couple, alright. I remember talking about angles of gables and stuff. Alright, are we ready to make a motion? McDonald: I'm ready. Sacchet: You are ready to make a motion. McDonald: I make a motion Mr. Chairman that the staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following four motions. And adopt the attached findings of fact and recommendation and it would be A and B, and then 1 through. Sacchet: A, B, C and D? McDonald: Yeah, 1 through 51 and then C, yeah. A, B, C and D. Sacchet: With all conditions. McDonald: With all conditions and attachments, plus I'd like to add one more that the developer and staff work together on color schemes. Sacchet: Does that go with which one? 55 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 McDonald: C(12). C(12). That staff work with the developer on, how do I want to phrase this? Color schemes? Aanenson: Well I wrote down materials and colors, and diversity. McDonald: What she said, that's good. Sacchet: Materials, colors and diversity. Distinction. Add distinction. So there's a motion. Is there a second? Undestad: Second. McDonald moved, Undestad seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone, from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within this staff report. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. McDonald moved, Undestad seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall prepare a noise analysis for noise that will be generated by traffic on Highway 312. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. 3. The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as their portion of the 2005 AUAR. 4. The developer shall designate Common Lots 13 and 18 as Outlots. The developer shall establish a separate outlot(s) for the land within the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone. 6. Dedication of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone shall be made to the city or a conservation easement shall be established over said outlot(s). 7. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be complete within one year of the authorized fill on Liberty on Bluff Creek. 56 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 8. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. 9. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. Due to a secondary access through the MnDOT right-of-way (ROW) to the north in the northeast portion of the property, the applicant will be responsible for creating or securing sufficient wetland mitigation for MnDOT that will meet all conditions imposed on MnDOT and will be responsible for any and all fees associated with the redesign of the wetland mitigation areas in MnDOT ROW. Final plat approval shall not be granted until the wetland mitigation plan has been received and approved by the City and MnDOT. 11. The plans shall be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas shall be preserved. In addition, all structures shall maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading shall occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 12. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations shall occur within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. 13. The applicant shall submit a plan for the revegetation of the farmed area south of Bluff Creek that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Special attention shall be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). 14. Alterations appear to be proposed within a mapped FEMA unnumbered A Zone (100 -year floodplain). In lieu of a LOMA, the applicant shall obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain. 15. A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) shall be developed for the development and shall be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. 16. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the proposed pond. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail shall be included the plan. 57 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 17. The plans shall show paths of access to both wetland mitigation areas as well as all erosion controls and restoration practices. 18. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slovee Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, stone sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 19. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 20. The applicant shall provide details for curbside inlet control. Wimco-type inlet controls shall be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. 21. Typical building lot controls shall be shown on the plan. These controls may include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. 22. The proposed storm water pond shall be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond shall be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail for the temporary pond outlet shall be included in the plans. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. 23. The ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek shall be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. 24. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. 25. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $266,850. 0 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 26. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. 27. Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to construction around all areas designated for preservation and/or at the edge of proposed grading limits. 28. Silt fence or tree protection fencing shall be installed at the edge of grading around both wetland mitigation areas. 29. A fenced access road will lead from the east mitigation area to the west mitigation area. This will be the only access allowed to the western site. Fencing shall be placed on either side of the access lane. After construction, the access lane shall be restored according to the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan'. 30. A walk-through inspection of the silt/tree preservation fence shall be required prior to construction. 31. No burning permits shall be issued for tree removal. All trees removed on site shall be chipped and used on site or hauled off. 32. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 33. The applicant shall submit a full sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 34. A turf plan shall be submitted to the city indicating the location of sod and seeding areas. 35. The developer shall pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final plat approval in lieu of parkland dedication. 36. The applicant shall provide all design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the "Bluff Creek Trail." All construction documents shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be ten feet in width, surfaced with bituminous material and constructed to meet all City specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed for the actual cost of construction materials for the Bluff Creek Trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials utilized in its construction. 37. The developer shall provide a sidewalk connection to the Bluff Creek trail through private street B. 59 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 38. The developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Pioneer Pass (Peterson Property) and Degler property developments to the west and northwest. 39. The height and length of retaining walls must be reduced to the maximum extent possible. 40. The top and bottom of wall elevations must be shown on the final grading plan. 41. A building permit is required for any retaining walls four feet high or taller. These walls must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 42. The style of home and lowest floor elevation must be noted on the grading plan. 43. Typical sections for each housing style must be shown on the final grading plan. 44. The final grading plan must be 50 scale so that staff can complete a full review of the proposed grading. 45. The developer must verify the invert elevation of the sanitary sewer connection that will be constructed with the 2005 MUSA hnprovement Project. 46. The development may not proceed until the Phase 11 2005 MUSA utility extension project has been awarded. 47. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges and the SAC charge at the time of building permit. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00/unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00/unit for watermain. The SAC charge is $1,625.00/unit. Sanitary sewer and watennain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 48. The northern access (currently shown to the Fox property) must be shifted to the east to the MNDOT right-of-way parcel. 49. The Arterial Collector Fee shall be paid with the final plat. The 2006 fee is $2,400/developable acre. 50. The final plans must show the new orientation for Lots 13 and 14, Block 2. 51. The site plan and final grading plan must identify the proposed 10 -foot wide bituminous trail. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. McDonald moved, Undestad seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — March 21, 2006 Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The developer shall provide a design plan that shows the color and architectural detail for each unit on the site for final plat approval. 3. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire - resistive construction. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. 7. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 8. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 9. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 10. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 11. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required on the private streets. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of sign. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #06-1991. 12. Staff will work with the developer on materials, colors and diversity. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 61 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting—March 21, 2006 McDonald moved, Undestad seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall implement the `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' dated 9/29/05 for restoration within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 2. The applicant shall submit a full-sized `Preliminary Offsite Upland Planting Plan' with final plat submittal. 3. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. 4. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. 5. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Sacchet: Thank you very much. We wish you luck. So the idea is that this will be looked at before it goes to council. It goes to council on April 10d' depending on where we are with those issues, and I believe our discussion bore out the issues pretty well how we feel about this. PIONEER PASS: REOUEST FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM DENSITY AND OFFICE/ INDUSTRIAL TO RESIDENTIAL, LOW DENSITY (APPROXIMATELY 43 ACRES); REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT, A2 TO RESIDENTIAL LOW AND MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT, RLM (APPROXIMATELY 43 ACRES); PRELIMINARY PLAT (PIONEER PASS) CREATING 82 LOTS, 8 OUTLOTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PUBLCI STREETS (APPROXIMATELY 73 ACRES); CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT WITH A VARIANCE FOR ENCROACHMENT INTO THE PRIMARY ZONE; AND A WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT FOR THE GRADING AND FILLING OF WETLANDS ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF PIONEER TRAIL (1600 PIONEER TRAHJ AT FUTURE HIGHWAY 312, PLANNING CASE NO. 06-09, APPLICANT D.R. HORTON. 62 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE PC DATE: August 2, 2005 [2] CC DATE: August 22, 2005 REVIEW DEADLINE: September 1, 2005 CASE #: 05--W 2-4 BY: Aanenson 1. Rezoning and Preliminary Planned Unit Development — from Agricultural Estate to PUD, medium density residential 2. Subdivision with variances —of 36.01 acres into 30 lots 3. Site Plan Review — of 138 townhouses 4. Conditional Use Permit for grading within the Bluff Creek Overlay District LOCATION: The property is located east of Audubon road and north of Pioneer Trail (1500 Pioneer Trail) APPLICANT: Town & County Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55345 952-253-0474 PRESENT ZONING: A2, Agricultural Estate ACREAGE: 36.01 gross acres 30.09 net acres DENSITY: 3.8 unit's acre gross / 4.5 units an acre net 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Medium Density Residential SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a rezoning to allow for a PUD, subdivision and site plan approval to build 138 townhomes. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezoning, PUDs and amendments to the PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policymaking capacity. A rezoning or PUD and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a Variance is limited to whether or not it meets the standards of the City zoning Ordinance. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. N the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 2 PROPOSAL SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a rezoning from A-2 to PUD -R to construct 138 townhomes. The density proposed at 4.5 units an acre net is consistent with the comprehensive plan or medium density. The development also proposes a subdivision and site plan review as well as a conditional use for grading within the secondary zone of the Bluff Creek Corridor/Floodplain. There are some significant grading issues which result in some tall retaining walls. All 138 townhomes would be the same housing product. Staff is encouraging the developer to provide greater design changes or introduce another home, maybe one that is one story, especially in those areas that are not walkouts. Staff is recommending tabling this item to rework the grading and site design issues. BACKGROUND There is an existing home and farmstead on the site. Current access to the property is via a driveway from Pioneer Trail. The construction of new Highway 212 bisects the southeast comer of the property, thus eliminating the current driveway. Because of the flood plain and an additional crossing of the creek with a public street, staff recommends access be gained from the north. This access would require the completion of the new collector street (Bluff Creek Boulevard), as well as possible access through the Degler and Fox family parcels. The site has an elevation change of 70 feet from the north to the bottom of Bluff Creek on the south. The site is located within the Bluff Creek Overlay District which includes Bluff Creek and the surrounding floodplain. There are some significant slopes in the area but none of them meet the definition of a bluff. Comprehensive Plan/ Land Use Land Uses based on the 2020 City Comprehensive Plan and the Chanhassen 2005 Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Existing Land Use (-based on assessors code) GROSS ACRES TOTAL 624 ACRES Agriculture Use (row crop orpasture) 442 Acres Agriculture, Residential 174 Acres Residential Estate 9 Acres Other Area Calculations T.H. 212 Right -Of -Way (approximate area) 125 Acres Wetlands (Chanhassen Wetland Inventory -45.2 acres and Bernardi Property54 delineated -8.8 acres) Acres Floodwa s (100 year floodplain) 78 Acres FSteep Slopes (Chanhassen inventory of 18% or greater slopes) 19 Acres Bluff Creek Overlay Primary District 200 Acres Net developable 350 Acres Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 3 LAND USE DESIGNATION TOTAL NET DEVELOPABLE ACRES PERCENTAGE OF LAND USE MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MAGNITUDE DATA Medium Density Residential/Low Density Residential 132 38% 8 du/acre 528-1056 units Medium Density Residential 66 18% 8 du/acre 528 units Office 17 5% 0.35 FAR 270,00 square feet Office/Industrial 70 20% 0.30 FAR 920,500 square feet Bluff Creek 45 13% Primary Zone Park 20 6% park Net Acres Total 350 100% * Any District 112 school has been eliminated from the 2005 MUSA Alternative Urban Areawide Review The conceptual approval for Town and Country required an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Rather than completing an EAW on just this site, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was undertaken for the entire 2005 MUSA (Lower Bluff Creek) Metropolitan Urban Service Area. In reviewing the Lower Bluff Creek, in a holistic setting there were specific mitigation strategies that were established and they are listed below. Attached are the Complete Mitigation Initiatives. All of the recommendations are being incorporated in the design of the Lower Bluff Creek area. All property with the Lower Bluff Creek area will be assessed for the cost of the AUAR on a per acreage basis. The assessment for the AUAR will be paid at the time of plat recording. Specific strategies: 1. All permits identified in the AUAR (See question #8), as well as other necessary permits that may be required, will be secured by the City, or private parties as appropriate, for all development activities within the project area. 2. The City will follow its own regulations, ordinances, plans, and policies currently in place in the review and approval of all development activities within the project area. These items include The 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the official zoning and subdivision ordinances and the Bluff Creek Overlay ordinance. In addition, the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan, the Surface Water Management Plan, the Public Water Supply and Distribution System Plan (currently being revised) and the Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan will be used as technical resources in reviewing development activities and developing associated public infrastructure. 3. The City will extend public sewer and water services in a manner consistent with existing plans and policies for delivering trunk sanitary sewer service and watermain systems. Abandonment and closure of individual well and septic systems will follow existing local Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 4 and state regulations. 4. The City will work with Mn/DOT and Carver County to periodically monitor traffic as generated from development within the project area as well as regional development initiatives that will affect the project area. Regional roadway improvements such as TH 212/312 and improvements to County Roads (Audubon Rd., Lyman Blvd., Pioneer Trail and future Powers Blvd. extension) will alter travel patterns. Performing traffic counts and monitoring traffic movements will help in facilitating future local roadway improvements. 5. The City will provide for adequate regional and local stormwater ponds and trunk facilities to protect water resources and water quality as guided by the Storm Water Management Plan and Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan. [National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II with individual site development] 6. The City will implement a development tracking mechanism to monitor development within the AUAR Project Area and its conformance with the development scenario. 7. The City will enforce its parkland dedication practices consistent with the goals and policies outlined in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan and the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan and the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. 8. The City will follow existing zoning regulations including Floodplain Overlay (Article V), Wetland Protection (Article VI), Shoreland Management (Article VII), Bluff Protection (Article XXVIR) and Bluff Creek Overlay (Article XXXI) to protect natural and environmental resources from potential impacts resulting from the Development Scenario. The City will reference policies and strategies outlined in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan and Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan as technical resources during the review of specific development projects. Multi -Family Design Standards In the fall of 2004 the City adopted Design Standards for Multi -Family developments. Sec. 20-1088. Architectural style. • Architectural style shall not be restricted. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and in relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions of this section. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. Designs that are incompatible with their surroundings or intentionally bizarre or exotic are not acceptable. • Monotony of design, both within projects and between adjacent projects and its surroundings, is prohibited. Variation in detail, form, and sighting shall provide visual interest. Site characteristics that may be used for this purpose include building and Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 5 landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. • All buildings shall have a minimum of 20 percent of accent material. Accent material may include brick, stone cut face block or shakes. The use of any EFTS shall not be on the first story of any building or one story in height. There is only one home style for all 138 units. The variety will be only in color (2 choices) and brick selection. Not all products meet the 20 percent accent material. Staff would like to see another housing type introduced, specifically a one-story unit that works with the grades. See. 20-1089. Land use. All developments shall create a unified design of internal order that provides desirable environments for site uses, visitors and the community. The following design elements shall be incorporated into a project: • The project shall create a unique neighborhood identity. • Creation of interconnecting neighborhoods in collaboration with adjoining landowners (street, walkways, preservation of natural features, parks and gathering places). • Each neighborhood has a focal point or gathering place including parks, greens, squares, entrance monuments, historic structures (silos/barns) or public furniture (gazebos, benches, pergolas). • Recreation facilities (playgrounds, tot lots, swimming pools and gardens). • Diversity of product type and design to accommodate different age groups and individuals in different socio -economics circumstances. • Broad variety of housing choices --twin homes, row houses, town homes, flats above garages, apartments over shops, garden apartments, senior living opportunities and condominiums. Aaccess to the site is via the collector road Bluff Creek Boulevard. The development is topographically separated in the fact that it is bordered on the south by Bluff Creek and the trees on the steep slope with a wooded area to the north. It will be an isolated neighborhood because of these factors. While there is a preservation area to the south there isn't any focal or gathering place. Again, all units would be one type. Staff is recommending that a greater neighborhood identity be established through the creation of a gathering/focal place and the introduction of another housing style. Sec. 20-1090. Curb appeal. To encourage roadway image or curb appeal projects shall create a variety of building orientation along the roadways; attractive streetscape and architectural detail. All projects shall incorporate two or more of the following design elements: • Orientation to the street or access road: ■ Setbacks ■ Spacing between buildings and view sheds. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 6 • Architectural detail/decorative features. • Windows. ■ Flower boxes. ■ Porches, balconies, private spaces. • Location and treatment of entryway. ■ Surface materials, finish and texture. ■ Roof pitch. ■ Building height and orientation. • Location of garages. • Landscaping including fencing and berming. • Street lighting. • Screening of parking, especially in apartment and condominium developments. • Variations/differentiations in units including, but not limited to, color, material, articulation etc. In order to see any of the townhomes, you will have to drive into the development; it will be screened from neighboring properties. There are balconies and patios off the back of the units. The front of the townhome has an articulated roof line using different material and has brick. More brick will need to be used to get to 20 percent accent materials. All garages face the public street. There is some monotony in the look and the layout. An additional housing type, enhancement to architectural features and view sheds need to be improved. Sec. 20-1091. Transportation diversity. All developments shall be incorporate multi -modal transportation including two or more of the following elements: • Streets with trails incorporated. • Off road trails and bike paths. • Provisions for mass transit with bus stops and shelters incorporated into the developments. Sidewalk connecting internal developments. ■ Undulating sidewalks. Use of pavers or stamped concrete. • On -street parking and use of roundabouts. ■ Landscaped boulevards or medians. There will be a sidewalk on streets A, B and C. The sidewalk will connect with the sidewalk/ trail on the collector road. The majority of guest parking will be in the driveways with additional parking provided. Sec. 20-1092. Integration of parks, open space, natural historic or cultural resources. • Integrate nature and wildlife with urban environment. ■ Trails and sidewalks. ■ Vistas. ■ Historic features. Preservation of natural features that support wildlife and native plants (slopes, trees, wetlands). Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 7 The incorporation of the Bluff Creek Overlay District preserves the property to the south. There will be spectacular views to the south that should be capitalized on through the opportunity of a gathering place. Livable Communities Act The City signed on with the Livable Communities Act in 1995. The principles of the act state that the City support: 1. A balanced housing supply, with housing available for people of all income ranges. 2. The accommodation of all racial and ethnic groups in the purchase, sale, rental and location of housing within the community. 3. A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life -cycle. 4. A community of well-maintained housing and neighborhoods, including ownership and rental housing. 5. Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. 6. The availability of a full range of services and facilities for its residents, and the improvement of access and linkage between housing and employment. All of the units are intended to be owner occupied. The price range for the units will be in the mid $200,000's. Any home sale under $193,700 in 2005 would be considered affordable under the Metropolitan Council standards. It appears that there will be no affordable housing units. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The applicant is seeking a PUD in order to develop the entire site as one project Preliminary PUD The following review constitutes an evaluation of the PUD request. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent "Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfer of density, construction phasing, and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. " Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 8 The existence of the Bluff Creek Overlay District makes PUD the appropriate zoning. SITE PLAN REVIEW The development has one housing style: a three or two-story lookout or walkout. PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The applicant has proposed development standards in their PUD plan. Staff has reviewed these proposals, made comments or findings, and then given the staff proposal for language to be incorporated into the final PUD plan document. a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood mixed -density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. b. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Building Setback Required I Minimum Proposed From Exterior Lot Lines 50 feet 60 feet Interior Public Right -of -Way 30 feet 30 feet Setback from Private Street 30 feet 30 feet Setback from Collector ROW (212) 100 feet 100 feet Hard Surface Coverage (Total site) 30% 26% RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS The plans propose only one housing style. Staff is recommending that there be more variety in the style of the unit or an additional one-story unit be added, especially in the areas that would not be a walkout. Premier Homes a. Two -Story (with or without basement). b. Building exterior material shall be a combination of 4" vinyl siding or shake and brick. c. Colors used (yet to be finalized). d. Each town house shall consist of 4 or 6 unit buildings with 2 -car garages. The garage door shall be decorative with windows. e. Each unit shall utilize accent architectural features such as: louvers, dormers, shed or gable dormers over the patio, etc. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 9 f. All units shall utilize fiberglass shingles. g. All units shall have access onto an interior street. h. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building or landscaping. *Additional architectural detail is requested, specifically in the Premier home and the color choices. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick and stone. PRELIMINARY PLAT - SUBDIVISION The subdivision of the site includes 2 Blocks, 30 Lots and 1 Outlot. Block 1 has 13 buildings; 58 units and one common lot. Block 2 has 15 building, 80 units and one common lot. Outlot A is the location of the driveway to the existing home. LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations for the Liberty at Creekside development are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands and bluffs) 30.87 acres Total canopy area (excluding wetlands and bluffs) 5.40 acres Baseline canopy coverage 17.5% Minimum canopy coverage allowed 20% or 6.2 acres Proposed tree preservation 14.6% or 4.5 acres Developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore the difference is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage (5.4-4.5) .89 acres Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement area 1.07 acre or 46,609 SF Total number of trees to be planted 43 trees Replacement required to meet 20% cover 32 trees (6.2-5.4)/ 1089 SF) A total of 75 trees are required for reforestation in the development. Applicant is proposing a total of 260 trees as a part of the landscaping plan. Additional landscaping required for the development includes buffer yard plantings along the east property line. The following table summarizes the minimum requirements: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 10 Applicant meets minimum requirements for the bufferyard landscaping. Additional comments concerning landscaping and tree preservation include the need to extend fencing around the entire wetland mitigation areas that will be constructed on the south side. This fencing will protect the adjacent wooded areas. Fencing shall also be installed on either side of the access road connecting the two mitigation areas so that during the construction of the ponds disturbance to the existing wetland is kept to one access road. Additional landscaping is needed behind the units on Lot 7, Block 1 to provide increased privacy and reduce glare from oncoming headlights on Street A. Staff recommends at least 6 evergreens and 3 ornamentals be planted strategically in that area. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Bluff Creek runs through the southwest corner of the 36 -acre site. Trees are along the north and south sides of the creek. The area lying south of the creek contains some steep slopes and wetland areas on the west and east side. The northern quarter of the property is a steep, vegetated area. The remainder of the property is a vegetated area with gentle slopes. The property lies within the 2005 MUSA Expansion study area. Kimley-Hom completed a study on the 2005 MUSA area which included street system analysis and proposed trunk utility alignments. Access to the proposed development will be from a local street that will extend the east -west collector identified in the report. The northern portion of this street lies outside of the plat boundaries; therefore, the developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Peterson Bluff development to the west. The developer proposes to develop the area north of the creek. Due to the 70 -foot drop in elevation from the northern plat boundary to the edge of the Bluff Creek Overlay District Line, the entire area north of the Overlay District Line will be mass graded, with the exception of the portion of the property in the extreme northwest corner of the site. The proposed grading plan identifies a storm water pond on the east side of the property, berms in the southeast comer and several retaining walls. Staff will work with the developer's engineer to limit the number and height of retaining walls within the site; however, there may be significant changes to the site plan in order to accomplish this. Required Proposed East property line - 4 overstory 13 overstory bufferyard B, 495' 8 understory 21 understory 30' width 12 shrubs 32 shrubs East property line — 14 overstory 14 overstory bufferyard B, 707' 28 understory 28 understory 15' width 42 shrubs 42 shrubs Applicant meets minimum requirements for the bufferyard landscaping. Additional comments concerning landscaping and tree preservation include the need to extend fencing around the entire wetland mitigation areas that will be constructed on the south side. This fencing will protect the adjacent wooded areas. Fencing shall also be installed on either side of the access road connecting the two mitigation areas so that during the construction of the ponds disturbance to the existing wetland is kept to one access road. Additional landscaping is needed behind the units on Lot 7, Block 1 to provide increased privacy and reduce glare from oncoming headlights on Street A. Staff recommends at least 6 evergreens and 3 ornamentals be planted strategically in that area. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Bluff Creek runs through the southwest corner of the 36 -acre site. Trees are along the north and south sides of the creek. The area lying south of the creek contains some steep slopes and wetland areas on the west and east side. The northern quarter of the property is a steep, vegetated area. The remainder of the property is a vegetated area with gentle slopes. The property lies within the 2005 MUSA Expansion study area. Kimley-Hom completed a study on the 2005 MUSA area which included street system analysis and proposed trunk utility alignments. Access to the proposed development will be from a local street that will extend the east -west collector identified in the report. The northern portion of this street lies outside of the plat boundaries; therefore, the developer must coordinate the location and elevation of the western street connection with the Peterson Bluff development to the west. The developer proposes to develop the area north of the creek. Due to the 70 -foot drop in elevation from the northern plat boundary to the edge of the Bluff Creek Overlay District Line, the entire area north of the Overlay District Line will be mass graded, with the exception of the portion of the property in the extreme northwest corner of the site. The proposed grading plan identifies a storm water pond on the east side of the property, berms in the southeast comer and several retaining walls. Staff will work with the developer's engineer to limit the number and height of retaining walls within the site; however, there may be significant changes to the site plan in order to accomplish this. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page I1 The grading plan must show the proposed top and bottom of wall elevations for all retaining walls. Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. The developer proposes to install storm sewer throughout the site to convey runoff from the development to the proposed pond. Staff has not reviewed the hydrology calculations as staff anticipates that there will be significant changes to the grading plan. If necessary, the developer must submit revised hydrology calculations based on the final site design. The style of home and lowest floor elevation must be noted on the grading plan. UTILITIES Trunk sanitary sewer and watermain to serve the proposed development will be constructed with the 2005 MUSA Expansion Improvements, City Project 04-05. The proposed lateral watermain and sanitary sewer within the site cannot be extended until the trunk utilities have been installed. The 2005 MUSA feasibility study, which was approved by the City Council in the fall of 2004, listed this property among assessment areas for the trunk watermain, sanitary sewer and storm drainage improvements associated with the 2005 MUSA project. The assessments are based on the area of the property and will be calculated at the time of final plat consideration. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. STREETS The site plan identifies two road connections to the development: one from the Peterson Bluff property to the west and one from the Laurent property to the east. There is no sketch plan for development of the Laurent property. A concept plan for Peterson Bluff has been submitted. The developer's engineer must coordinate the site design for Liberty at Creekside with the design of Peterson Bluff. The 2005 MUSA feasibility study listed this property among assessment areas for the roadway improvements associated with the project. The assessment is based on the area of the property and will be calculated at the time of final plat consideration. The developer proposes to construct the following public streets: • Street A, a north -south, 31 -foot wide local street within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way, • Street B, an east -west, 31 -foot wide local street within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way, and • Street C, a 700 -foot long cul-de-sac extending north from Street B. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 12 The site plan includes 20 -foot wide private stub streets to serve Lots 10-15. A 31 -foot wide, looped private street is proposed southwest of the Street A/Street B intersection. Staff does not support the proposed loop street since Lot 7, Block 1 would be surrounded entirely by streets. The developer proposes to construct 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks on the east side of Street A, the north side of Street B and on the west side of Street C. WETLANDS Existinz Wetlands Two Ag/Urban wetlands exist on-site. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. delineated the wetlands in May 2004. Wetland A is a Type 2/3 wetland located in the southwest comer of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass. No wetland impact is proposed. Wetland B is a Type 1/2 wetland adjacent to Bluff Creek that runs through the southern half of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass and box elder. No wetland impact is proposed. On May 12, 2004, City staff conducted an on-site review of the wetland delineation. The wetland boundary shown on the plans is consistent with staff recommendation. Wetland Creation Plans for Liberty on Bluff Creek, a nearby project proposed by the applicant for this project, rely upon the construction of two wetland mitigation areas on this site. The mitigation is proposed south of Bluff Creek in areas that may be floodplain. The applicant should work with staff to address comments on Liberty on Bluff Creek's wetland mitigation that are received from the reviewing agencies. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek must be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. Wetland replacement must occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MIR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. BLUFFS Several areas on the property have been identified as areas with steep slopes (slopes greater than or equal to 30%). The plans should be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas must be Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 13 preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low -impact practices. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. All structures must maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. The grading plan should be revised to eliminate alterations within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. The area within the Bluff Creek Overlay District south of Bluff Creek has been historically used for agricultural purposes. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan. Special attention should be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). FLOODPLAIN Alterations appear to be proposed within a mapped FEMA unnumbered A Zone (100 -year floodplain). In lieu of a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA), the applicant will be required to obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL (Water Resources) SWPPP A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is needed for the development and must be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. It is recommended the SWPPP be submitted to the City and the Carver Soil and Water Conservation District (CSWCD) for review prior to final approval. Erosion Control A stable emergency overflow (EOF) is needed for the proposed pond. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf reinforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail should be included the plan. It is unclear how the contractor will gain access to wetland mitigation areas. A temporary creek crossing may be needed unless access can be gained from the west or south. The plans should show paths of access to both wetland mitigation areas as well as all erosion controls and restoration practices. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 14 The storm sewer extension is planned outside of perimeter controls. Additional erosion control notes should be provided on the plan; erosion control blanket should be installed as needed in this area within 24 hours of storm sewer installation. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tyne of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. Sediment Control The silt fence proposed for the north side of the property should be moved to be consistent with the Bluff Creek Overlay District Grading Limit Line, as shown on Sheet 5 of 10. Curbside inlet control details are needed. Wimco-type inlet controls should be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. Typical building lot controls should be shown on the plan. These controls should include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. The proposed storm water pond should be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond should be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail is needed for the temporary pond outlet. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. Storm Water Management It is recommended that the ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek be adjusted to discharge water parallel to the creek flow; presently the outlet is shown to discharge water perpendicular to the flow and could increase bank erosion of the creek. The outlet should be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 15 Storm sewer plans should be revised in two locations so storm sewer is not located beneath retaining walls. Plans for the storm sewer should be submitted. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as Public Value Credie (PVC) and storm water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. Surface Water Management Fees Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on townhome development rates of $2,091/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 36.01 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $75,297. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Medium density residential developments have a connection charge of $4,065 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $146,381 for the proposed development. SWMP Credits This project proposes the construction of one NURP pond. The applicant will be credited for water quality where NURP basins are provided to treat runoff from the site. This will be determined upon review of the ponding and storm sewer calculations. Credits may also be applied to the applicant's SWMP fees for oversizing in accordance with the SWMP or the provision of outlet structures. The applicant will not be assessed for areas that are dedicated outlots. No credit will be given for temporary pond areas. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $221,678. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Army Corps of Engineers, Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 16 PARKS AND TRAILS Parks The proposed Liberty at Creekside subdivision is located within the 2005 MUSA area at the edge of Bluff Creek and is proposed to be developed into 138 residential town homes. The City's Comprehensive Park Plan calls for one acre of usable park space to be set aside for every 75 residents. Liberty at Creekside, as proposed, will result in an estimated 350 new residents moving into Chanhassen. Therefore this subdivision generates the need for 42/3 acres of new parkland. However, the Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that building a small park in every residential subdivision is undesirable and would result in an unmanageable municipal park system. To this end, the plan calls for neighborhood parks to be centrally located within housing regions with a maximum distance of one mile between neighborhood parks. This pooling of resources and land in order to centrally locate parks in specific park service areas results in the efficient use of limited capital and long-term maintenance dollars. In the case of the Liberty at Creekside proposal, the City is planning to service neighborhood park needs at a location less than one-half mile to the north and west. Therefore, the City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication as a condition of this subdivision. Trails A variety of pedestrian improvements should be incorporated into the proposed Liberty at Creekside plat. Foremost is a ten -foot wide asphalt trail to be constructed adjacent to and paralleling the Bluff Creek corridor. This important trail will need to be constructed on the north side of Bluff Creek at this location. This trail is currently not reflected in the plans submitted by the applicant. Additional pedestrian trails, sidewalks and trail connectors also need to be incorporated into the project as required. The planning, construction and financing of these pedestrian improvements are the responsibility of the applicant. The City will reimburse Town and Country Homes the cost of construction materials only for the ten -foot wide Bluff Creek Trail. FIRE MARSHAL COMMENTS The plan review is based upon available information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted, the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. 1. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 2. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. 3. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 17 4. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. BUILDING COMMENTS The following comments should be included in the conditions of approval: Accessibility will have to be provided to all portions of the development and a percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. Further information is needed to determine these requirements. 2. The buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 square feet in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 3. The buildings will be required to be designed by an architect and engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names and an addressing plan for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. 5. Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing any structures on the site. 6. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 7. Walls and projections within three feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire - resistive construction. 8. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 9. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 10. The developer and or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission recommends tabling the request for rezoning from A2 to PUD -R, site plan review with subdivision for the following reasons: Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 18 1. Allow staff the opportunity to work with the developer's engineer to attempt to reduce the number and height of the proposed retaining walls; and 2. Significant changes to the grading plan that may result from #1 may change the site plan; and 3. Work to create greater neighborhood identity and housing design." The applicant shall work with staff to incorporate the following conditions prior to the next submittal: Park and Recreation Recommended Conditions of Approval • Park fees in lieu of land dedication as a condition of this subdivision. Additional pedestrian trails, sidewalks and trail connectors also need to be incorporated into the project as required. The planning and construction and financing of these pedestrian improvements are the responsibility of the applicant. The City will reimburse Town and Country Homes the cost of construction materials only for the ten -foot wide Bluff Creek Trail. Water Resources Subdivision Recommended Conditions of Approval The applicant shall work with staff to address comments on Liberty on Bluff Creek's wetland mitigation that are received from the reviewing agencies. The wetland mitigation for Liberty on Bluff Creek shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts on the Liberty on Bluff Creek project. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) and the conditions of the Wetland Alteration Permit for Liberty on Bluff Creek. Wetland buffers 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetlands A and B and the constructed wetland mitigation areas. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. • All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. The plans shall be revised to show bluff areas (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe). All bluff areas shall be preserved. In addition, all structures shall maintain a minimum 30 -foot setback from the bluff and no grading shall occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). • All structures shall maintain a minimum 40 -foot setback from the primary corridor. No alterations shall occur within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. The grading plan shall be revised to eliminate alterations within Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 19 the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. • The applicant shall submit a plan for the revegetation of the area south of Bluff Creek that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan. Special attention shall be paid to areas with steep slopes (greater than 3:1). • The applicant shall determine whether impacts are proposed within the mapped FEMA Unnumbered A Zone and shall either submit a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) showing that this area is not floodplain or obtain a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain if impacts are proposed. • A storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is needed for the development and shall be completed prior to applying for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. The SWPPP shall be submitted to the City and the Carver Soil and Water Conservation District (CSWCD) for review prior to final approval. • A stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the proposed pond shall be shown on the plans. A typical detail shall be included the plan. • The plans shall show paths of access to both wetland mitigation areas as well as all erosion controls and restoration practices. • Additional erosion control notes shall be provided on the plan to address the extension of storm sewer outside the perimeter controls; erosion control blanket shall be installed as needed in this area within 24 hours of storm sewer installation. • Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. • The silt fence proposed for the north side of the property shall be moved to be consistent with the Bluff Creek Overlay District Grading Limit Line, as shown on Sheet 5 of 10. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 20 Wimco-type inlet controls shall be used along curbs and installed within 24 hours of installation. • Typical building lot controls shall be shown on the plan. These controls shall include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the certificates of occupancy. • The proposed storm water pond shall be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond shall be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. Diversion berms or ditches shall be used to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet should be installed. A detail shall be provided for the temporary pond outlet. Additional temporary sediment basins shall be constructed if necessary during construction. • The ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek shall be adjusted to discharge water parallel to the creek flow. The outlet shall be turned to the southeast to align with the creek. • Storm sewer plans shall be revised in two locations so storm sewer is not located beneath retaining walls. Plans for the storm sewer shall be submitted. • Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as Public Value Credit (PVC) and storm water ponds. An easement adequate to provide access to the pond for maintenance purposes is needed and shall be shown on the plan. • At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $221,678. • The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Army Corps of Engineers, Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. Forestry Recommended Conditions of Approval • Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to construction around all areas designated for preservation. Silt fence or tree protection fencing shall be installed at the edge of grading around both wetland mitigation areas. A fenced access road will lead from the east mitigation area to the west mitigation area. This will be the only access allowed to the western site. Fencing shall be placed on either side of the access lane. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 21 Additional landscaping will be required behind the units on Lot 7, Block 1 to increase privacy and minimize headlight glare. A minimum of 6 evergreens and 3 ornamentals shall be strategically located behind the units. A walk-through inspection of the silt/tree preservation fence shall be required prior to construction. Fire Marshal Recommended Conditions of Approval • No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. • Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. • A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. • Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Building Recommended Conditions of Approval • Accessibility will have to be provided to all portions of the development and a percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. Further information is needed to determine these requirements. • The buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 square feet in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. • The buildings will be required to be designed by an architect and engineer as determined by the Building Official. • The developer must submit a list of proposed street names and an addressing plan for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. • Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing any structures on the site. • A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 August 2, 2005 Page 22 • Walls and projections within three feet of property lines are required to be of one-hour fire - resistive construction. • Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. • Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. • The developer and or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. ATTACHMENTS 1. Application. 2. Extension Letter from Town & Country dated June 29, 2005. 3. Public Hearing Notice and Property Owner List. 4. Preliminary Plat Submittal dated June 14, 2005. 5. On -Street Guest Parking Plan dated June 20, 2005. 6. Construction plans dated June 17, 2005. &Aplan\2005 planning =m\05 -I 1 bberty m bluff =k\liberty pud pre0iminary.dm PLEASE PRINT CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Planning Case No. O5 _a CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUN 1 7 2005 CHANHASSEN PtANNINCr D&T Aplicant Na a and Address: Owner Name and Address: 54t& CV '4G C 1 D U* 5 S S D t 'G I MA.( t;953+Lt Contact: Ko5fi7i Me'it(t, Contact: Phone:,1SZ-h.';3-0q14Fax:5'SZ-94y-3455' Phone: Fax: Email: Email: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development` T _K Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review' QIO (5004 Sx 14-4) Subdivision* Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment X Notification Sign" - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost"' - $50 CUP/SPR/VAC/VAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8'/�" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: LA 0&04A-4 L4 51 M"'> j LOCATION: U' 5 } 6? -Au U K N14-4&( 7110)4-2e+r , W a+ A prp LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I ta-je SGS- aACC&Zd nt WAG `1 t\ TOTAL ACREAGE: ©• Ziq fi WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: Tu -c> " Mp�i • �� PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: 51 Isoont�ror�ee��rail YL�i ?-IZ L This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before fling this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 4�Aoh4--- t(`//-7/6'57_ Si natu a of AppiidaAt V Date Signature of Fee Owner Date GAplanWonns\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/05 SCANNED TOWN & A RY HOMES Minnesota Division June 29"', 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Liberty at Creekside Dear Ms. Aanenson: Town & Country Homes submitted our Liberty at Creekside plans for preliminary plat review on June 17"', 2005. We would like to set up a meeting shortly after we receive the staff report for this submittal to go over any questions. This letter represents a written request to extend the city review period of the Preliminary Plat to September 1st, 2005. Please contact me at 952-253-0474 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, -4�& ��w 6Y�X— Krista M. Novack Community Planning Manager Land Development 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 SCANNED (952) 944-3455 • Fax (952) 944-3437 MN Builder License #9137 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on July 21, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Liberty at Creekside — Planning Case No. 05-24 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me thiscg[!�day of CJL.,-tq 2005. �• Notary Publi %,.,^.,� NotaryPublic-Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2010 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, August 2 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 30 lots, 1 outlot, Proposal: and public right-of-way; Conditional Use Permit for grading in the Bluff Creek Overlay District; and Site Plan Approval for 138 townhouses. Planning File: 05-24 Liberty at Creekside Applicant: Town & Country Homes Property 1500 Pioneer Trail Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the ro'ect. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 or e-mail Questions & kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit Comments: written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallndustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planninu Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, August 2 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 30 lots, 1 outlot, Proposal: and public right-of-way; Conditional Use Permit for grading in the Bluff Creek Overlay District; and Site Plan Approval for 138 townhouses. Planning File: 05-24 Liberty at Creekside Applicant: Town & Country Homes Property 1500 Pioneer Trail Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 or e-mail Questions & kaanenson@ci.l;hanhassan.mn.us. If you choose to submit Comments: written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online at htto1/206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council, The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciaVinclustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard, Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Disclaimer This ,rep is neither a legally recorded nap W a survey ars is not intended to ce usetl as ate. TNS map is a cortpilation of words, information and data located in vancus city, county, state and federal offices and other Spumes regarding the area shown, and Is to be used for reference purposes only. The CM does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free. and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used lox navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring erecting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depotion of geographic featuresh ertom or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03. Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be Bade for any damages, and expressly waives all clans, and agrees to defend, Indemnity, and hold hi mess the City from any and all claims brought by User. Its employees or agents, or this parties which ansa out of the users access or use of data provided. Disclaimer This erep is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This reap is a compiles of recants. Information and data located in various cry, county. slate and feda9 offices and other sources regarding the area shi and is to be used for reference purposes only - The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracGng or any other purpose requiring awning measurement of distance or direction or precision in Me depiction of geographic features. If mars or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceling cisclartter is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statures §46603. Subd. 21 (2001 and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all darts, and agrees to defend. indemnify, and hold hamtless the City from any and all claims brought by User. its employees or agents, or third parries which ansa out of the users access or use of data provided «NAME1,, «NAME2» «ADD1 ,,ADD2» ,,CITY,, ,STATE„ "ZIP,, ,,Next Record,,,, NAM Eli, «NAME2,, ,,ADD1,r aADD2,, ,,CITY,, „STATE,, «ZIP, Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER FOX PROPERTIES LP ARTHUR B JOHNSON TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 27990 SMITHTOWN RD 17448 FRONDELL CT 1630 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 24760 CEDAR POINT RD NEW PRAGUE MN 56071 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL MN 55155 NDI MINNESOTA LLC C/O HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MN LLC 7615 SMETANA LN SUITE 160 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 PETERSON-JACQUES FARM LAND CO C/O SEVERIN H PETERSON JR 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 Revised Preliminary Plat Submission for: at cIWI= *1uc CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED Submitted By JUN 1 7 2005 - _- CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT (iirF/ TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES a K. HovnanianA Company Liberty at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Conimunitl Naine Liberty at Creekside Legal Desertion Legal Description NW 1 /4 NW 1 /4 26 -116 -23 -TRACT A ALSO COMM AT SW CORN 23-116-23 TH N ON SECT LINE 30' TH IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A PT ON S SECT LINE OF SECTION 30'E OF Section: 23 Township: 116 Range: 023 Libem at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Contact Information LANDOWNER NDI Minnesota, LLC C/O Hovstone Properties MN, LLC 7516 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Krista Novack ph. (952) 253-0448 fax (952) 944-3437 DEVELOPER/APPLICANT Town and Country Homes — a K. Hovnanian Company 7516 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Krista Novack ph. (952) 253-0448 fax (952) 944-3437 SITE PLANNING, ENGINEERING Westwood Professional Services 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Chris Moerhl ph.(952) 906-7443 fax (952) 937-5822 Planning PUD Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Total Gross Acreage: - Slopes: - Existing Wetlands: - Mitigated Wetlands: Total Net Acreage: ROW: Oulots: Total Homes: A-2, Agricultural Preservation PUD/Medium Density Residential 36.01 Acres 1.47 Acres 0.90 Acres 2.77 Acres 30.87 Acres 3.55 Acres 0.43 Acres 138 Homes (Premier Collection) Gross Density: 3.83 Homes per AC Net Density: 4.47 Homes per AC ('Medium Density Residential allows for 8 Homes per AC Maximum Net Density) Lihem at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Street, Roadways & Drives: Public Street (Including Parking on One Side) Private Streets Private Drives Setbacks (Minimums): Public ROW Private Street Private Drive Abutting Property Wetland Buffer Building to Building 20ft. 32ft. B -B; 60ft. ROW 32ft. B -B 20ft. & 25ft. B -B 25ft. w/walk, 15ft.w/out walk 25ft. back of curb 20ft. back to curb 50ft. 40ft. Liberty at Creekside is currently zoned Agricultural and guided for Medium Density Residential. Town and Country Homes is proposing a PUD/Medium Density Residential community for Liberty at Creekside. This enables us to be creative with our site layout and design, and allows for more opportunity for preservation, community character, and density clustering. The site planning for Liberty at Creekside has taken into consideration the Bluff Creek Overlay District boundary lines and buffering requirements, as well as the information deriving from the AUAR conducted for the 2005 MUSA Expansion Area. Access is a difficult obstacle in planning this community. We are proposing road access at the NW corner of the site just south of a slope area. We feel that this is the least obtrusive option in providing street access to the community from the major collector road planned for the area. Another difficulty with this site is the topography. Basement products and creative street layouts help us to work with the steep slopes. We have gone through a number of various concepts for this site and are confident that we have shaped a plan that uses the site's natural features to its advantage. Architecture Liberty at Creekside will feature our Premier Collection, which is our basement style townhome. Base Price: Sq. Footage: Mid 200's 1400-1800s.f. Number of Homes: 142 Highlights: Lihern at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14. 2005 - Provides a plan with the Master on the Main Floor - Walk -Out Basements - Bright and Filled with Windows Style: Scenic, Cozy, Relaxed, Luxurious, and Private Community Placement: Takes advantage of Preservation/Steep Slope areas in the community by bringing the focus to the back of the homes with balconies and walkout basements. This Collection also boasts a more Natural Setting and provides yet another housing style for the life cycles within the "Liberty' communities and Chanhassen. Market: Empty Nesters, Move -Up Townhome Buyers, and Families. Since Town & Country Homes first proposed the Premier homes for Liberty on Bluff Creek (which is the larger site to the West along Audubon), we have upgraded the look of the homes to integrate an even more traditional flare, and to customize the homes special for the City of Chanhassen. Quality of Life Woodlands, ponds, wetlands and the highly regarded Bluff Creek Overlay district surround Liberty at Creekside. In planning this community, our best efforts were focused on preserving as much of the site's natural integrity as possible. Product selection and layout plays an enormous role in optimizing all the site has to offer. Site walks and discussion with city staff has lead us to the attractive Liberty at Creekside plan we have today. The "Liberty" communities will truly offer something special to homebuyers by surpassing normal levels of green space preservation, outdoor activity possibilities, and desirable locations. Homeowners Association: LibertY at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14. 2005 A Homeowners Association will maintain all common areas, private streets, and amenities - including the community pool. Town & Country Homes is proficient and experienced in HOA creation and management. We take pride in the management companies we hire and expect a high level of standards and performance. This guarantees that the community will be meticulously maintained, and will retain a high value for years to come. Noteworthy News: Very recently, a well-known and successful national homebuilder just entering into the Minnesota market place, K. Hovnanian, has acquired Town & Country Homes. This is an exciting turning point for Town & Country Homes because we will now be backed with even more ability to venture into unique and innovative opportunities. K. Hovnanian is a publicly held company, yet still maintains strong family values and ownership, which was important to Town & Country Homes and the Ryan family. Town & Country Homes will keep its name, and current office location. We look forward to expanding on our success in the homebuilding community. To learn more about K. Hovnanian, visit their website at www.khov.com. .� Famih o} Builders Lihem at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 4 1 • 3 y�y iA,+ .Mx.'., s I� Ae �:I rL--� -A a'. -A Construction Plans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared /or: TOWN & COUNTRY HOMB 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Praire, Minnesota 55344 Contact Kevin Clark Phone: (952) 253-0462 Fax (952) 9443437 Prepared by ". Westwood Prroofessiorel Stri es. Inc. Project number: 20021071.00 c t=L: Lnrlr OaM1. P.C. CITY OF RECEIVED SSEN JUN 17 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT vtcllm MAP www Construction Plans Ilelimin.ry )'ut Subeuoel a Ubefty at �c...k sue a.. vvrm of � w u 56iR�!�,1a4$�jjj jq u +bl.R Iss :L }jp! 31� K:Fi�:euw_A+: Ki9R ^.S RRYR R t=a i icSf .9 s3F } a Ci a!��adaaaa3laa rSaa ��i Si �_ , b 4 new s+.i ,_..nom wusw�e.w �m:.. 1a S 4 as 4;��ti Ep 4` Nix sq �+ j�•!�?t§!az 9!!t 14Q4° p�t e.,4Dtlbrgy F t s �4z i 1991.E o Ad�2le 1!� aG� !e •.� 4 t PAIS t4'� �'y YYep �!liN+g[e9 444-•tt••es 4esFgle i Ata Yt�i l9i@t i44t 7 MUM eFseB§ o 4 iF @ �ht `g�, i +gg �0� +6 6°` ' P0B"e "eEeFot BF"e� BS l4egi @ a fit` t. s��A$§$$$x o m •d a lo &e}3ppyfePf.gg pg19'y4y4 �pl�@y4�9i sB99 �f]�7�54,g`ti•+ 1p9rj}4 1419 t�i {!?t+ A�4Y�"{)j } it�e4lP9 teY 4@ FiF RSA lk Ai?� 3i al Y?!8 fli/6t i3 1 ' i (i . ... .. u h - O Z r OF^T ��jjjyyy !A 4 At fix - c ;�tl� � e: , ��I•i��jl��l lYr�1 V��t rli t l� � �� i /`-1 � B _ � i r r (7 i/�� •IJ rl�� tT! ��/ Ir 77 /7 —,) / r^- i � � x i i eQ t` : f 7713 ii je7S5 i '�� a t i l y W Jul tt!7 f�},i Jf l-, I;!! ; i t 7.13i j ! J� �'i.}2. FIJ ! 1 (! 7}f,} �1( I' lfli�ii if�is !i}if f�fBSS i E'idk �♦" }� a}�`g ; " .� N V S± • e • Y �'�� Oe' s3. Y �� •• s7. j1q 'S5331j�::'till m IlS 1j:'•:Jill !`= w isli' i Jaz ifill i 1 t ( { lilt i71� J111ItJ f if iiif:: ii ! 7 It 7 t °t it y 3Ff :iitttf y i' ; }i y e 7 it i i I}i j; [tti�; 7 d 1f{�1I"" i I!ffit3 7i77IfI{i!.J3iliii7I fat ffsf!I:# �v, b cawiO�.cmuvY..l..nva�.� f f FT. TL_iT//p/TTA,T]T//.RT Ali �lS137!lSIIlISSl1lS11II1 FI/I I. >1 li !SSS a pi Ili k>� :EE€Ftl FEFFFzFF€€€FFF�FF All F d R V;RTnp R<T>/AL>eTTY/�<:.x .ex ea TSx pf i<R4>RRCTTxaa RYYe s i i 41"I111?€i4j l8dddjt[[+i4441t C'1 te�((t 1lligi4 tit 1i 1iidd ltii i Elie iiv I111!li11111l�illlll[1lf11111d3FF13FFiFl3i11J11Sili3ii17i3il37�S1i3! fit illll :PEEEPElEE€EEEE!€P€!?s°i-q<q<s SSSS:*R.. 3•TT.YSLRTCp[TCTT YTIT<ipT»LLATTTSa TRTLA}pTiO<ALS_RLTTTT]T__TSRGTTT=RReG<RCe � �!lIIII!!!!!!S!!!SIlIlSSlII!!!!!!!IIIIISIIIS!!ISlIlSIIlIIlI!!I!I!I!€±!±!:•±±! c s dd € i'"�1 ( diddd' eidal € dd'ddd •11R !1.11111e s= 1 € N+L.i11 € ee. ,9 I1I€! 1 !il+j�li1F1.331111l111SI3l lld3/ 3+, 131eai�3513i 1€�i3i1.1llil F :€€E€€!€Fzt €€P€EPP€PPPPPPP€rp€€ € -Ili U !Pf€€€ lAPi PP. Spill==,e€S.-gli � i :3 �f E E J ; 6E (LJ W iWl <Q/[N MWII(�E,M<\Y01tltl � aE a 4e dd aY p� a ianTeg¢ I a � i N TX S s a 9 YE ia"y04 a ne - 3 N� yy a 'a-"fix <3 P fiCy�Inb'�e tl y a P a "a E, E 55y � 3 � eo 9a 3"a��i42g � j ❑ W 'O z ii � 3e a T yE 3niESe� : 1 I I j I xiE € a aVaada I e .K 3a Y � Tyga I I I � �yj 7 IT sipp i6 ix3 ¢A ,a�iaE i i b if •a 5 F? i!i x•83 C i: a S 9T A �aiTr? H A I# g Z Tr Tn 4 Tliy Fp I 3 3 \ Nil i £ � I rj yT b y Y \ � � 1 �i • f I 1 I , y \ ' g6• 3Yi' A � • dY / \ I `F 3r. I III I' iSiF o�w xan wz.ays '+mnao�.e.�lxam.• |; m I ) � ~ / ^,Z §� Ah � � } A � � r .l � \ oil, ` : § �■ m I �?±Imo•- - w Sian x a U W 4 R k� eg 3 I .c r w.e m.N e�a.nussne.u.amv.. f I ti •� R.RRB ¢.m �.FFaR R un -w =?FF ?$RR ig:FF 'aR Y R un F Met- a U W 4 R k� eg 3 I .c r w.e m.N e�a.nussne.u.amv.. f a* CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-24 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVENthat the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 2, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 30 lots, 1 outlot, and public rigbtof way; and ShePlanApprovalfor 136 townhouses. The property is located east of Audubon Road and north of Pioneer Trail (1500 Pioneer Trail) -Liberty at Creekside. Applicant Town&Country Homes. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available For public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Kate Aanenson, C .mnunity Development Director Email: kaanensonAeLchanhassen mn.us Phone: 952-227- 1139 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, July 21, 2005; No. 4480) 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.yy�� was published on the date or dazes and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of .2005 Notary Public 1 / AMYGWEN M. RADUENZ NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA Commission EVim Jan. 31, 2010 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $22.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $22.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $11.18 per column inch SCANNEo Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing CITY OF CHANHASSEN State of Minnesota) CARVER & HENNEPINCOUNTIES )SS. NOTICE OF ING PLANNING CASE NO. BLIC 05-24 County of Carver ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearatTOO g . intheday,Mah7,2006, Chambers Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized at7:00 an asses City a1,7700 in Chanhassen City Hall, 770o agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- Market Blvd. The purpose of this lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: hearing is to consider a request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal PUD -R; Subdivision with newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as Variances of approximately 36.01 amended. acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan (g) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. Approval for 196 Use Permit and was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Conditional w Use Permit for P sP alterations within the flood plain Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cu[ from the columns of and development within the Bluff the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both Creek Overlay District. The inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition property is located east ofAudubon and publication of the Notice: Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 abcdefghijkhmnopgrstuvwxyz (1500 Pioneer Trail) -LIBERTY AT CApplicant: Town & (`-'/ V l . Country Homes. A plan showing the location of gy the proposal is available for public Laurie A. Hartmann review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this Public hearing and express their Subscribed and sworn before me on opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: this 3'x'1 day of ��1.V'tt.tax+- 2006 beenerousAci chanhassen tun us GWEN M. RADUENZ Phone: 952- NOTARY PUBUC - NANESOTA 227-1131 (Published in the Chanhassen My Commbdon EVm Jun 31,2110 Villager on Thursday, February 23,2D06; No. 4618) Notary Public RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $40.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $40.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $11.51 per column itch SCANNED • • 0,5 --2-q CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-24 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 21, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The property is located east of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 (1500 Pioneer Trail) — LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE. Applicant: Town & Country Homes. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: bbgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on March 9, 2006) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-24 NOTICE IS HERE BY GI V EN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 21, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 ouflots, and public right -of way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within theBluffCreekOverlayDistrict. The property is located east of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwestoffutureffighway312(1500 Pioneer Trail) - LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE. Applicant: Town & Country Homes. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: beenerousAci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (PublishedintheChanhassenVillager on Thursday, March 9, 2006; No. 4625) 0 • Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) zy Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopqto Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this q, -A day of i714.'t rA1 2006 GM K RAWDa NOTARYPURX-NNiWA U W Unnift Edea Jan 31, 2D10 �7 Notary Public RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $40.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $40.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter._ ............................................ $11.51 per column inch SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-24 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 7, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The property is located east of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 (1500 Pioneer Trail) — LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE. Applicant: Town & Country Homes. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: b¢enerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on February 23, 2006) SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES AT MINN Date: 06/24/2005 Time: 11:32am Receipt Number: DW / 6265 Clerk: DANIELLE PUD/SITE PLAN REVIEW/REZONE - 05-24 LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- DEVAP PUD/SITE PLAN/REZONE - 05-24 USE & VARIANCE 1,630.00 SIGN RENT 75.00 REZONING 750.00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 --------------- Total: 2,555.00 Check 56041 Check 56042 Check 56044 Check 56043 Change: THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! 420.00 1,210.00 175.00 750.00 0.00 $CANNED SCANNED r`= _z4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN • • 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES INC Date: 07/08/2005 Time: 11:29am Receipt Number: DW / 6311 Clerk: DANIELLE 05-24 LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE ITEM REFERENCE ------------------------------------------- AMOUNT DEVAP 05-24 LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE USE & VARIANCE 600.00 --------------- Total: 600.00 Check 55520 600.00 --------------- Change: 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! SCANNED City of Chanhassen TOWN S COUNTRY HOMES, INC. 7615 SMETANA LANE, SUITE 180 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 JUL-05-2005 • vendor liberty 0 creekside app. fee 141-49-111-1000-10M CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUL 0 8 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNINp DEPT $600.00 City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 JUN -14-2005 vendor 446 Liberty at Creekside Subdivision fee 141-49-111-1000-1000 P to oo t HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA, LLC. DBA TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES AT MINNESOTA 7615 SMETANA LANE, SUITE 180 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 x MS q2 -c io�1 slg ��Zo N $boa $420.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUN 1 7 2005 CHANHASSEN PUNNING DEPT City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA, LLC. DBA TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES AT MINNESOTA 7615 SMETANA LANE, SUITE 180 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 JUN -14-2005 vendor 446 Liberty at Creekside site plan review 141-49-111-1000-1000 $1,210.00 I4}24oi+-g = -)ID CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUN 1 7 2005 CHANHASSEN PUNNING DEPT JUN -14-2005 City of Chanhassen vendor 446 $175.00 P.O. Box 147 Liberty at Creekside- 7700 Market Boulevard notification sign Chanhassen, MN 55317 141-49-111-1000-1000 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUN 17 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA, LLC. DBA TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES AT MINNESOTA 7615 SMETANA LANE, SUITE 180 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 JUN -14-2005 City of Chanhassen vendor 446 $750.00 P.0. Box 147 Liberty at Creekside 7700 Market Boulevard PUD rezoning fee Chanhassen, MN 55317 141-49-111-1000-1000 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUN 1 7 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MINNESOTA, LLC. DBA TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES AT MINNESOTA 7615 SMETANA LANE, SUITE 180 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES a K Hovnanun' Company July 11, 2006 Mr. Robert Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 JUL 1 1 2006 Chanhassen, MN 55317 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT RE: Liberty at Creek Side Dear Mr. Generous: Please find enclosed two (2)11x17 copies of the fully updated Liberty at Creek Side plans which were approved by the City Council on May 22, 2006. If you need a full size set of the plans, please let me know and I will direct Westwood Professional Services to forward a set to you. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-253-0460 if you have any questions or concerns. Very truly yours, awn Siders Community Planning Manager Enclosure 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • Phone 952-944-3455 • Fax 952-944-3437 • www.townandcountryhomesmn.com Minnesota Builder #20539403 S #20543466 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. PLANNING - ENGINEERING •SURVEYING TRANSMITTAL Date: July 11, 2006 To: Bob Generous City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 From: Chris Moehd Regarding: Liberty at Creekside GITY RECEIVED SEN JUL 1 1 206 O{pNHASSEN PLANNING DEIn W 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937.5150 Fax 952-937-5872 Toll free 1.888-937-5150 E-mail: wps@n oodps.c TWIN CMESIMETRO 5T. CLOW RRAINERD Proj. No.: Items: 20021071 -AS No Description 8 full sets of revised plans 1 11x17 of same Purpose: Remarks: As you requested Bob: Attached is the latest updated plan set for your files We have incorporated some of the sketch plans that have been submitted previously with the twins Don't hesitate to call with questions. Thanks. Chris Delivery: Mail Copy to: Shawn Siders (1 full, 1 11x17), Juanita Voigt (3 full, CD with pdf file, 1 11x17, Drainage Report) Desgsmsg Use ruNieTodry� 1972 Revised Preliminary Plat Submission for: CIL cree�.��uG Submitted By n -T,. CITY CHANHAS RECEIVED SEN JUN 17 2005 CHANHASSEN PUNNING DEPT TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES a K. Hovnanian Company Liberty at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Community Name Liberty at Creekside Legal Description Legal Description NW 114 NW 1 /4 26 -116 -23 -TRACT A ALSO COMM AT SW CORN 23-116-23 TH N ON SECT LINE 30' TH IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A PT ON S SECT LINE OF SECTION 30'E OF Section: 23 Township: 116 Range: 023 Liberty at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Contact Information LANDOWNER NDI Minnesota, LLC C/O Hovstone Properties MN, LLC 7516 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Krista Novack - ph. (952) 253-0448 fax (952) 944-3437 DEVELOPER/APPLICANT Town and Country Homes — a K. Hovnanian Company 7516 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Krista Novack - ph. (952) 253-0448 fax (952) 944-3437 SITE PLANNING, ENGINEERING Westwood Professional Services 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Chris Moerhl - ph. (952) 906-7443 fax (952) 937-5822 Planning PUD Current Zoning: A-2, Agricultural Preservation Proposed Zoning: PUD/Medium Density Residential Total Gross Acreage: 36.01 Acres - Slopes: 1.47 Acres - Existing Wetlands: 0.90 Acres - Mitigated Wetlands: 2.77 Acres Total Net Acreage: 30.87 Acres ROW: 3.55 Acres Oulots: 0.43 Acres Total Homes: 138 Homes (Premier Collection) Gross Density: 3.83 Homes per AC Net Density: 4.47 Homes per AC (`Medium Density Residential allows for 8 Homes per AC Maximum Net Density) Liberty at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Street, Roadways & Drives: Public Street (Including Parking on One Side) Private Streets Private Drives Setbacks (Minimums): Public ROW Private Street Private Drive Abutting Property Wetland Buffer Building to Building 32ft. B -B; 60ft. ROW 32ft. B -B 20ft. & 25ft. B -B 25ft. w/walk, 15ft.w/out walk 25ft. back of curb 20ft. back to curb 50ft. 40ft. 20ft. Liberty at Creekside is currently zoned Agricultural and guided for Medium Density Residential. Town and Country Homes is proposing a PUD/Medium Density Residential community for Liberty at Creekside. This enables us to be creative with our site layout and design, and allows for more opportunity for preservation, community character, and density clustering. The site planning for Liberty at Creekside has taken into consideration the Bluff Creek Overlay District boundary lines and buffering requirements, as well as the information deriving from the AUAR conducted for the 2005 MUSA Expansion Area. Access is a difficult obstacle in planning this community. We are proposing road access at the NW corner of the site just south of a slope area. We feel that this is the least obtrusive option in providing street access to the community from the major collector road planned for the area. Another difficulty with this site is the topography. Basement products and creative street layouts help us to work with the steep slopes. We have gone through a number of various concepts for this site and are confident that we have shaped a plan that uses the site's natural features to its advantage. Architecture Liberty at Creekside will feature our Premier Collection, which is our basement style townhome. Base Price: Sq. Footage: Mid 200's 1400-1800s.f. Number of Homes: 142 Highlights: Liberty at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 - Provides a plan with the Master on the Main Floor - Walk -Out Basements Bright and Filled with Windows Style: Scenic, Cory, Relaxed, Luxurious, and Private Community Placement: Takes advantage of Preservation/Steep Slope areas in the community by bringing the focus to the back of the homes with balconies and walkout basements. This Collection also boasts a more Natural Setting and provides yet another housing style for the life cycles within the "Liberty" communities and Chanhassen. Market: Empty Nesters, Move -Up Townhome Buyers, and Families. Since Town & Country Homes first proposed the Premier homes for Liberty on Bluff Creek (which is the larger site to the West along Audubon), we have upgraded the look of the homes to integrate an even more traditional flare, and to customize the homes special for the City of Chanhassen. Quality of Life Woodlands, ponds, wetlands and the highly regarded Bluff Creek Overlay district surround Liberty at Creekside. In planning this community, our best efforts were focused on preserving as much of the site's natural integrity as possible. Product selection and layout plays an enormous role in optimizing all the site has to offer. Site walks and discussion with city staff has lead us to the attractive Liberty at Creekside plan we have today. The "Liberty" communities will truly offer something special to homebuyers by surpassing normal levels of green space preservation, outdoor activity possibilities, and desirable locations. Liberty at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Homeowners Association: A Homeowners Association will maintain all common areas, private streets, and amenities - including the community pool. Town & Country Homes is proficient and experienced in HOA creation and management. We take pride in the management companies we hire and expect a high level of standards and performance. This guarantees that the community will be meticulously maintained, and will retain a high value for years to come. Noteworthy News: Very recently, a well-known and successful national homebuilder just entering into the Minnesota market place, K. Hovnanian, has acquired Town & Country Homes. This is an exciting turning point for Town & Country Homes because we will now be backed with even more ability to venture into unique and innovative opportunities. K. Hovnanian is a publicly held company, yet still maintains strong family values and ownership, which was important to Town & Country Homes and the Ryan family. Town & Country Homes will keep its name, and current office location. We look forward to expanding on our success in the homebuilding community. To learn more about K. Hovnanian, visit their website at www.khov.com. ' A Family of Builders Liberty at Creekside Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal June 14, 2005 Carver County Abstract and Title Co., Inc. Phone 952-448-5570 Fax 952-448-5155 Junel5,2005 Town & Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 Attn: Krista Novack 411 Chestnut St. PO Box 106 ska, MN 55318 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUN 17 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT According to the 2005 Tax Books in the Carver County Treasurers Office the following persons are listed as owners of the property within Carver County, Minnesota, which lies within 500 feet of the following described legal description: See Attached Exhibit "A" PIA #25-0232300 1. Fox Properties LP 27990 Smithtown Rd Excelsior, MN 55331 2. Gayle O & Lois L Degler, Trustees of Trust 1630 Lyman Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 3. Peterson -Jacques Farm Land Co c/o Severin H Peterson, Jr 15900 Flying Cloud Dry Eden Prairie, MN 55347 4. G & M Laurent Family Limited Partnership 24760 Cedar Point Road New Prague, MN 56071 5. State of Minnesota — DOT 395 John Ireland Blvd 631 Transportation Bldg St. Paul, MN 55155 eumO m Carver County Abstract & Title � + ^", 1 w REGI This Company does not assume any liability for the accuracy of this report. SCANNED foo/noz SHOA MOOD 0 NA01 I'd C91T IM S0091LI/90 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23 (referred to herein as Tract ). ALSO: Commbncing at the Southwest corner of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Sectio line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest corner of said Section and pl 'ce of beginning. Being a three -cornered piece in Southwest corner of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23. I ALSO: Beginning at the southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 146 North of Range 23 West; thence south along the quarter -quarter section line a distance of 800 feet to arver County Road No. 14; thence east along the north line of said Carver County Road No. 14 a distan o of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the aforementioned quarter-quartcr section 827 feet to a point 26 feet north of the cast -west quarter -quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26; thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter -quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of beginning (referred to herein as Tract B). EXCEPT: that part of Tract A which lies Easterly of Line I described below: I Line 1, Commencing at the north quarter corner of said Section 26; thence run west on an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section for 1634.2 feet to the point of beginning of Line I to be described; thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 min tes 07 seconds for 478.28 feet; thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarte and there terminating; and EXCEPT hat part of Tract 13 which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of Line 2 described below: I Line 2J Commencing at the point of termination of Line I described above; thence run east on! a azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 seconds along the south line of the North half ofI�the Northwest Quarter of said section for 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 i u be described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds for 448.73Ifeet; thence on an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 feet; thence �n an azimuth of 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet; thence on an azimuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating; Together with right of access retained in Quit Claim Deed Document No. 310751 pursuant to Access Driveway Pernjit dated August 26, 2002, h00/6002 SHKOH A8MOD a N01 YVA Mtl IH NN/!I/90 CITU OF CHONSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952 2271110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 9552.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Pah & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952227.1300 Fax: 952227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web She www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us June 1, 2006 Mr. Shawn Siders Town & Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Development Notification Sign Escrow Refund Liberty at Creekside - Planning Case 05-24 Dear Mr. Siders, Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $100 which represents a refund of the development notification sign escrow for the above -referenced project. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 952-227-1107 or by email at kmeuwissen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Kim T. Meuwissen Planning Secretary KTM:ms Enclosure {CANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding [rails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Vendor: Town & Country Homes at Minn Vendor No: towhom Vendor Acct No: Invoice Number Date Description 6265 05/30/2006 Refund sign escrow -liberty at creekside Check Date: 05/31/2006 Check Amount: $100.00 Invoice Amount 100.00 CITY CHANHASSEN M&I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK 129395 7700 MARKET BLVD., P.O. BOX 147 n-ns9m CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952)227-1140 Pay: *** One hundred dollars and Zero cents Date Amount 05/31/2006 $100.00 To the order of: Town & Country Homes at Minn THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS DOCUMENT INCLUDES AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK - HOLD AT AN ANGLE TO VIM 012939511' 1:09 100 1 1 5 7;: 00257,1177312,1' !ITY OF CHANHASSEN '700 MARKET BLVD !HANHASSEN MN 55317 'ayee : �I )ate: 06/24/2005 Time: 11:32am receipt Number: DW / 6265 :lerk: DANIELLE 'UD/SITE PLAN REVIEW/REZONE - 05-24 ,IBERTY AT CREEKSIDE :TEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- )EVAP PUD/SITE PLAN/REZONE - 05-24 USE & VARIANCE 1,630.00 SIGN RENT 75.00 REZONING 750.00 IGN ESCROFb>;T :., lv=,Ok Total: --------------- 2,555.00 :heck 56041 :heck 56042 :heck 56044 .heck 56043 Change: THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! 420.00 1,210.00 175.00 750.00 0.00 OK to return sign escrow. Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director E Date c5 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax:952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.d.chanfassen.mn.us Final plat documents must be submitted to the City thirty (30) days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Since Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official g:\plan\2005 planning casesx05-24 liberty at c veksideXextension letter prelim plal.doc z� %CPA%ED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality, schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding (rails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. May 31, 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Mr' John D. Ostergren Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 7700 Market Boulevard Suite 1500 PO Box 147 50 South Sixth Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Re: Liberty at Creekside Fax952227.1110 Planning Case #05-24 Building Inspections Phone: 952227.1180 Dear Mr. Ostergren: Fax 952.227.1190 Engineering This letter is to confirm that on May 29, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council Phone: 952227.1160 approved a one-year extension for the preliminary plat approval for the Liberty at Fax 952.227.1170 Creekside development. This extension is until May 22, 2008. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax:952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.d.chanfassen.mn.us Final plat documents must be submitted to the City thirty (30) days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Since Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official g:\plan\2005 planning casesx05-24 liberty at c veksideXextension letter prelim plal.doc z� %CPA%ED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality, schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding (rails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Fol TNS C N.4, OV ti A Zc )-j [ A:'r c rJ i (- t ZIi-N V/ ;D, -j S>yF PLAiJ AN7 L;(3rP,T r 2q , Zocc nr < - c o U, N-rR NoMa�s RECEIVED MAY 2 1 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN May 18, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL Bob Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 fax (952) 227-1110 Re: Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen Planning Case No. 05-24 Request for Extension Dear Mr. Generous: HORSEY DG' JOHN D. OSTERGREN (612) 492-6983 FAX (612) 340-2868 ostergren.john@dorsey.com On behalf of NDI Minnesota, LLC, I am writing to request a one (1) year extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Liberty at Creek Side development, which I understand would extend the current approval to May 22, 2008. This extension is necessary in light of current depressed market conditions impacting residential development and construction, lack of development on adjoining and nearby parcels, and a contractual dispute between our client and Mr. Jeurissen. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information to support the requested extension. John D. O ergren cc: Peter J. Brennan Jocelyn L. Knoll DORSEY 8 WHITNEY LLP • WWW.DORSEY.COM • T 612.340.2600 • F 612.340.2868 SUITE 1500 • 50 SOUTH SIXTH STREET • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-1498 USA CANADA EUROPE ASIA -��orman.ian' 1 Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 May 7, 2007 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Dear Ms. Aanenson: 05 -2,Y RECEIVED MAY 0 S 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN I am writing to notify you that K. Hovnanian Homes has cancelled its purchase agreement with the seller of the Bruce Jeurissen parcel which had obtained preliminary plat approval for our Liberty at Creek Side community. Because of the difficult market conditions and lower than expected velocity of sales at our Liberty on Bluff Creek community, we can no longer pursue this community. I would like to thank you and your staff for your significant contributions to successfully obtaining preliminary plat approval for this community and we look forward to working with yourself and the city of Chanhassen in the future. K. Hovnanian Homes is continually exploring new development opportunities, and we would like to visit with you in the near future to determine what opportunities are available in Chanhassen for various types of communities. Once again, thank you for your continued assistance with our communities. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-253-0462. Very truly yours, Kevin M. Clark Vice President of Land Development cc: Rick Janssen, Vice President of Land Acquisition SCANNED MEMORANDUM To: Tom Whitlock, Damon Farber Associates From: Steven W. Thatcher Date: 4-19-06 Re: Fox Properties in the City of Chanhassen The purpose of this memo is to outline the advantages and disadvantages of three potential access roads for the Liberty at Creekside development. We understand that one access road to this development will be to the west as shown on the preliminary plat. 1. North Access Advantages: 1. Access to Bluff Creek Boulevard (east - west collector) Disadvantages: 1. The road will be a barrier between the wetland and the forest preserve and limit flexibility of combined use of these two natural resources, divide habitats and concentrates and amplifies run-off to the wetland. Roadway runoff will be treated at the Liberty at Bluff Creek development. No runofffrom the roadway will enter the wetland. 2. Road construction will be in a wetland, which must be avoided or minimized if possible. Wetland impacts are greater for this option than for other options discussed below. There are no wetland impacts associated with the north access roadway alignment. MnDOT was planning to use this area as a mitigation site. The additional cost to construct the road in the wetland is unknown because soil -boring information is not available. The cost for this option is likely to be more than the cost for the South Access option because of the construction in wetland areas, additional retaining walls and storm water management. Construction of the north access road will be designed by the developer and must be approved by Cit), staff to meet Cin• standards. Cost for the road will be paid 100% by the developer. 4. The road will cross a waterway flowing into the wetland that may need to be preserved. This waterway is within the Buff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone, and thus must be analyzed carefully. The road may interrupt the ground and surface water flow associated with this waterway to the wetland, which could negatively impact the wetland. Again, there are no wetlands at this location. The roachivy pavement section is only about 2" thick. The final design of the roadway may be raised based on profile grades. The roadway will not impact groundwater flow. 5. The road will have a steep slope to where is enters the Fox property. We believe this bluff slope should be preserved in its natural state. Several assumptions were made for the north access road by the Fox Property. Citv staff believes that the road can be constructed to meet City standards. 6. The North Access road impacts the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (approximately .44 ac.). Both the west and the north access roads appear to impact the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone equally. If the only two access roads to the development are to the north, there will be no access to the south for the residents of the development. This will cause additional traffic congestion on the roads to the north and will cause reduced convenience of access for the residents. With the current design proposed by the Liberty at Bh ff Creek development, traffic congestion would be minimized and trafficflow would still meet the AUAR guidelines. Greater congestion would be anticipated with the west secondary alignment proposed by Damon Faber Sheet L2. 8. Slope of the road into the Fox Property will be approximately 9.5%, which exceeds City requirements for streets. See No. 5 above. 9. Loss of tax revenue due to loss of lots and improved property. Cannot quantify. 2. Loop Road to West / North West Advantages: 1. This option has no wetland impact. Neither does the west option. 2. It is close to the other road access so there is not much additional environmental impact to the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone. We estimate that there will be significantly more environmental impacts. These include significant tree loss, more grading, and more f uture maintenance for the City. 3. Since the entire Liberty at Creekside development would be served by one loop street, only local trips would use the street; no through traffic would occur. With the current proposed roadway alignment of the Liberty at Creekside development, we would not anticipate any cut -through traffic. We would only anticipate local traffic on these roads. The alignment shown on the Damon Farber Sheet L2 is not recommended since it ties into a private street. Itis staffs' opinion that this design is not a looped system since there is only one access point off of Lyman Boulevard. Disadvantages: 1. This option uses the southwest corner of the forest preserve (approximately 0.32 ac.). However, this area has few trees so the impact is minor. We would anticipate these impacts to be greater than .23 acres due to the cut to construct the road and for the construction of the retaining wall. 2. If the only two access roads to the development are to the north, there will be no access to the south for the residents of the development. This will cause additional traffic congestion on the roads to the north and will cause reduced convenience of access for residents seeking to go south, southeast or southwest. The current roadway alignment in the Liberty of Bluff Creek development splits the traffic to mitigate congestion. 3. Additional cost for retaining walls. There will be a significant cost to build these retaining walls and f iture maintenance costs for the City. We would anticipate with the Damon Farber alignment that the wall would have to be tiered creating additional tree loss. 3. South East Access to Pioneer Trail Advantages: 1. This access allows pedestrian and emergency vehicle access to the future pedestrian trail in the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The 10 foot trail proposed in this area will allow for future emergency vehicle access. 2. It connects to Pioneer Trail, thus providing access between the development and the south, which will be more convenient for residents and reduce congestion on the east -west collector street on the north side of the development. This alignment is not recommended due to significant wetland impacts, additional right-of-way would have to be acquired from third parties, the property adjacent to Pioneer Trail is zoned commercial and is not recommended to bring residential traffic through this type of zone, and it is not recommended to bring a residential street underneath the TH 212 land bridge. 3. The impact on wetlands is less than the North Access option because the road will be in the same location as an existing driveway. The existing driveway is approximately 12 feet wide. City's roadway standard width is 31' wide within a 60'right-of-way. Wetland impacts would occur. The proposed alignment for Liberty at Creekside development north connection will not have any wetland impacts. 4. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) plans dated 4/7/06 show that they will be excavating the soft soil under most of the South Access road as part of the Highway 212 construction project. This will reduce the costs to build the South Access road. The south access road will cost significantly more to build than the north access road due to its length. 5. We have reviewed soil borings done by MnDOT, and they show no problems for constructing a street in this location. If soft soil remains outside the excavating performed by MnDOT, the road can be floated over the soft soil using geotextile fabric and about 3 -feet of select granular material. The additional cost is small because the City's standard street includes construction of 1 to 2 feet of select granular depending on soil conditions. This also applies to the north access road. 6. There is no impact on the forest preserve. Neither is the north access road on the Liberty at Creekside development. 7. No one would have to pay for removing the driveway from the Bluff Creek Overlay District, as would probably be desirable if the access road were built in one of the other locations. MnDOT plans dated 4/7/06 show the cross section of driveway reconstruction consisting of fill 7.5 high and 50 feet wide in the Bluff Creek Overlay District at West Bound TH 212 and fill 2.5 feet high and 30 feet wide at East Bound TH 212. The City is reviewing the driveway as a future trail connection and may utilize this alignment in the future. Disadvantages: 1. There is some impact to the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone, but it will be minor because the road will be in the same location as the existing driveway. We would not anticipate the impacts to be minor because of the widening of the driveway to a City standard street width. 2. Drivers could cut through the Liberty at Creek Side development to avoid traffic congestion on other north -south roads. However, the proposed alignment of streets in the development will discourage this. Agreed. gieng\paul\memos\fox memo response.doc �ihatcher MEMORANDUM To: Tom Whitlock, Damon Farber Associates From: Steven W. Thatcher Date: 4-19-06 Re: Fox Properties in the City of Chanhassen Thatcher Engineering, Inc. 3055 Old Highway 8, Suite 103 Minneapolis, MN 55418-2500 Phone: (612) 781-2188 Fax: (612) 781-2241 The purpose of this memo is to outline the advantages and disadvantages of three potential access roads for the Liberty at Creek Side development. We understand that one access road to this development will be to the west as shown on the preliminary plat. 1. North Access Advantages: 1. Access to Bluff Creek Boulevard (east — west collector) Disadvantages: 1. The road will be a barrier between the wetland and the forest preserve and limit flexibility of combined use of these two natural resources, divide habitats and concentrates and amplifies run-off to the wetland. 2. Road construction will be in a wetland, which must be avoided or minimized if possible. Wetland impacts are greater for this option than for other options discussed below. 3. The additional cost to construct the road in the wetland is unknown because soil -boring information is not available. The cost for this option is likely to be more than the cost for the South Access option because of the construction in wetland areas, additional retaining walls and storm water management. 4. The road will cross a waterway flowing into the wetland that may need to be preserved This waterway is within the Buff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone, and thus must be analyzed carefully. The road may interrupt the ground and surface water flow associated with this waterway to the wetland, which could negatively impact the wetland CADocurrents and Sdbngs\nmlk=\Dulaop\0597-Thatclkr4-19-06.doc Pagel of31 5. The road will have a steep slope to where is enters the Fox property. We believe this bluff slope should be preserved in its natural state. 6. The North Access road impacts the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (approximately ).44 ac.). 7. If the only two access roads to the development are to the north, there will be no access to the south for the residents of the development. This will cause additional traffic congestion on the roads to the north and will cause reduced convenience of access for the residents. 8. Slope of the road into the Fox Property will be approximately 9.5%, which exceeds City requirements for streets. 9. Liss of tax revenue due to loss of lots and improved property. 2. Looe Road to West / North West Advantages. This option has no wetland impact. 2. It is close to the other road access so there is not much additional environmental impact to the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone. 3. Since the entire Liberty at Creekside development would be served by one loop street, only local trips would use the street; no through traffic would occur. Disadvantages. 1. This option uses the southwest corner of the forest preserve (approximately 0.32 ac.). However, this area has few trees so the impact is minor. 2. If the only two access roads to the development are to the north, there will be no access to the south for the residents of the development. This will cause additional traffic congestion on the roads to the north and will cause reduced convenience of access for residents seeking to go south, southeast or southwest. 3. Additional cost for retaining walls. 3. South East Access to Pioneer Trail Advantages. This access allows pedestrian and emergency vehicle access to the future pedestrian trail in the Bluff Creek Overlay District. C:\Doctm m and SetringsVnwilkm\Deskwp\0597-Tiatcher4-19-06.doc Page 2 of 3 2. It connects to Pioneer Trail, thus providing access between the development and the south, which will be more convenient for residents and reduce congestion on the east -west collector street on the north side of the development. The impact on wetlands is less than the North Access option because the road will be in the same location as an existing driveway. 4. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) plans dated 4/7/06 show that they will be excavating the soft soil under most of the South Access road as part of the Highway 212 construction project. This will reduce the costs to build the South Access road 5. We have reviewed soil borings done by MnDOT, and they show no problems for constructing a street in this location. If soft soil remains outside the excavating performed by MnDOT, the mad can be floated over the soft soil using geotextile fabric and about 3 -feet of select granular material. The additional cost is small because the City's standard street includes construction of I to 2 feet of select granular depending on soil conditions. 6. There is no impact on the forest preserve. 7. No one would have to pay for removing the driveway from the Bluff Creek Overlay District, as would probably be desirable if the access mad were built in one of the other locations. MnDOT plans dated 4/7/06 show the cross section of driveway reconstruction consisting of fill 7.5 high and 50 feet wide in the Bluff Creek Overlay District at West Bound TH 212 and fill 2.5 feet high and 30 feet wide at East Bound TH 212. Disadvantages. There is some impact to the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone, but it will be minor because the road will be in the same location as the existing driveway. 2. Drivers could cut through the Liberty at Creek Side development to avoid traffic congestion on other north -south roads. However, the proposed alignment of streets in the development will discourage this. C:\Docu is and Settings\nwilkens\Dsktop\0597-Thatcher-19-06.doc Page 3 of 3 T T a, f t J fi Q[ n.: T T f t J fi Q[ n.: fJ <� r1� $ � e , }} [71 e� m v 'r1 �o oa €�� s 5 �@g.. a z� �$ � fs� �€ a a�a� a J 0 V 2 O Q V 0 w N O r y. w TOWN & April 18, 2006 Mayor and City Council City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creek Side Dear Mayor and City Council: _\ VIII l COUNTRY HOMES a K Ilwnareau' Canipq Thank you for the opportunity to provide additional information regarding the Liberty at Creek Side development following our discussion on April 10, 2006. During that discussion, Town & Country Homes was encouraged to discuss the secondary road access through the MnDOT property with Jeff Fox, representing the Fox Family Property. Since that meeting, we have had the opportunity to discuss the secondary access with Mr. Fox via telephone conversations and Westwood Professional Services has forwarded the Liberty at Creek Side development plans to his representatives. We look forward to meeting with Mr. Fox and his representatives and will work with city staff to identify the final alignment and elevation of the secondary access through the MnDOT property. It is our understanding that a proposed condition of the preliminary plat approval stipulates that this matter must be resolved prior to submitting the final plat application and Town & Country Homes is prepared to address that challenge during the development of the final plat. We have also identified an appropriate playground structure that can be installed in the cul-de- sac surrounded by private street "D." The proposed playground structure is an appropriate size for the area and is designed for children ages 5-12. The playground will be situated in the middle of the cul-de-sac area to minimize the opportunity for pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. The attached picture illustrates the proposed playground for the area. During the design of the Liberty at Creek Side community, the Premier and Concord collections were selected for this neighborhood because they offer the opportunity to better utilize the existing topography on the site. Because of their design features, we have been able to preserve additional open space within the neighborhood while offering views of the upgraded open areas to each homesite. As we discussed at the April 10, 2006 meeting, Town & Country Homes has included an additional color scheme that will only be available at the Liberty at Creek Side development. We propose that three color schemes be dedicated to the Premier units and three color schemes be dedicated to the Concord units. In addition to the varied color schemes, an appropriate brick or stone accent has been selected for each color pattern further distinguishing our color palette. Inn 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • Phone 952-944-3455 • Fax 952-944-3437 • www tuwnantkountryhomesmn com Minnesota Builder #20539403 6 #20543466 City of Chanhassen Liberty at Creek Side April 18, 2006 Page 2 The Liberty on Bluff Creek and Liberty at Creek Side communities offer enhanced architectural features that are not standard within other communities. For example, we have introduced three elevations to the Premier Collection. The Victorian, Farmhouse and Mission elevations Will be incorporated throughout both neighborhoods. By introducing three distinct elevations as well as the proposed color schemes for the Premier product line, we are able to ensure that the perimeter streetscape of the Liberty at Creek Side community varies as vehicles and pedestrians traverse the neighborhood. Town & Country Homes has also upgraded the architectural treatments to the Concord product line. We have introduced an assortment of exterior variations such as varied gables and porch roofs. Further, we have also introduced a variety of exterior building materials such as split face rock, brick, siding and shakes. While planning for this community, we reviewed a number of housing products that ranged in size and density. The Premier and Concord product lines allow Town & Country Homes to create an exclusive community that offers a stunning site design, enhanced architectural features, provides the necessary infrastructure, allows us to partner with the city to upgrade Lyman Avenue while creating housing opportunities that are affordable to a larger segment of the Chanhassen community. We are proud of the efforts by all parties involved to make this community successful and we stand behind the proposed plans that will ensure that this community is a success for the city of Chanhassen and Town & Country Homes. Thank you for your continued support of the Liberty at Creek Side development and we look forward to your approval on April 24, 2006. We are pleased to work with the city of Chanhassen to address these outstanding items and we are prepared to discuss these with you in greater detail. Very truly yours, Shawn Siders Community Planning Manager Enclosure cc: Kevin Clark, Vice President of Land Development Rick Janssen, Vice President of Land Acquisition Westwood Professional Services, Inc. PLANNING .ENGINEERING -SURVEYING TRANSMITTAL Date: April 6, 2006 To: Bob Generous City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 From: Chris Moehrl Regarding: Liberty at Creekside CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 9,52-937-5150 Fax: 7-5822 fr88-937-s150 Toll free:ee:1 1A E-mail: vvps@mstwoodps.wn, TWIN orIESM1E71110 ST. CLOUD BRAIN= Proj. No.: Items: 20021071 -AS No Description 8 full sets of revised plans 1 11x17 of same Purpose: Remarks: As you requested Bob: I thought it would be a good idea to update the entire set based on some of the conditions. Just give me a call if you have any questions. Thanks, Chris Delivery: Messenger - 3 hr. Copy to: Shawn Siders (1 full, 1 11 SCANNED Des y"t the FuaaeToday.sirce 1972 Westwood Professional Services, Inc- PLANNING ncPLANNING •ENGINEERING •SURVEYING. TRANSMITTAL Date: To: March 1, 2006 Bob Generous CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAR 0 1 2006 CHANHASSEN PANNING DEPT City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 From: Chris Moehrl Regarding: Proj. No.: Items: Liberty at Creekside 20021071 -AS No Description 8 full sets of revised 1 11 x17 of same Purpose: As you requested Remarks: 7599 Anagram Dme Eden Prairie, NIN 55344 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax 952-937-58N Toll flee: 14188-937-5150 Email wps®wesnvoodps.o I I'Itlt[.I '',JaltC. ST. GAUD BRAINERD Attached are the revised plan sheets for the site plan and preliminary plat Please don't hesitate to Delivery: Messenger - 3 hr. Copy to: Shawn Siders (1 full, 1 11 x1 SCANNED Dmgnirlg fie FuoxeToday._vrce 1972 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. PLANNING •ENGINEERING SURVEYING CITY OFCHANHASSEN W RECEIVED FEB 0 3 2006 TRANSMITTAL 7599 Anagram Drive CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Eden Prairie, MN 553" Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Tdl free: 1-88&9375150 E-mail: vepsOvaestwoodps-com Date: February 3, 2006 TWIN anELMETRo 5T. CLOUD To: Bob Generous BRAINERD City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 From: Chris Moehd Regarding: Liberty at Creekside Proj. No.: 20021071 -AS Items: No Description 16 full sets of revised plans 1 11x17 of same 1 section through the site 1 11 x1 7 of the section through the site 1 cover letter signed by Shawn Siders with T and C Purpose: As you requested Remarks: Attached are the revised plan sets for Liberty at Creekside Please let me know if you need any additional information. Delivery: Messenger - 3 hr. Copy to: Shawn Siders (1 full, 1 11x1 SCANNED Designing the FIDrte Todav-sine 1972 MT OF Date: February 6, 2006 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Robert Generous, AICP Subject: Request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 29 lots, 5 outlots, and public right-of-way; Site Plan Approval for 146 townhouses; and Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The property is located east of Audubon Road, north of Pioneer Trail and northwest of future Highway 312 (1500 Pioneer Trail). Applicant: Town & Country Homes Planning Case: 05-24 LIBERTY AT CREEKSIDE The above-described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on February 3, 2006. The 60 -day review period ends April 4, 2006. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on March 7, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than February 24, 2006. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director it. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources —Julie Ekman 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services S. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company est or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Ener ev or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 13. Chaska School District 112 14. SouthWest Metro Transit SCANNED Location Map Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen O'wNB'4 b IW Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 July 27, 2006 Bob Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Liberty at Creek Side Mn/DOT Review #P05 -080B (146 proposed town homes) North of new 212, East of Audubon Road Chanhassen, Carver County Mn/DOT Control Section #1017 Dear Mr. Generous: RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Thank you for re -submitting the Liberty at Creekside plat, received on July 11, 2006. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above -referenced plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03 Subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following comments: M9 Wetland Mitigation Site: Attached for your use is a copy of the M9 Wetland Mitigation Construction plan as approved by regulating authorities, including the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The proposed Street F and Pond B are at variance with the approved mitigation plan. Therefore, an alternative location for Street F and Pond B will need to be sought that will not interfere with the approved mitigation plan, as the schedule of the Design Build project cannot be jeopardized. Surveys /Right of Way. As requested in our previous review letter, dated March 6, 2006, the Existing Mn/DOT Right of Way needs to be clearly labeled, and the existing Access Control needs to be shown (and have the coordinating symbol shown in the legend. The Boomers and in place monumentation also need to be shown and identified on the final plat. Please direct survey questions to Bruce Wetherbee (763- 797-3110) of Mn/DOT's Metro Survey Section. The latest plan submittal needs to have Mn/DOT's existing Right-of-way identified on sheet no. 5 - preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan. Mn/DOT has a wetland mitigation site located on this right of way that will not support the drainage pond for the Liberty at Creekside project. Stormwater ponding for this project and Street F will need to be located off of Mn/DOT right of way. An equal opportunity employer • An amendment to plat map 10-20 has been made recently. The proposed plat should make reference to Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of way Plat No. 10-43. Plat 10-43 shows the existing access control from B 15 to B2017, which needs to be depicted on the final plat. A copy of this plat map has been attached to this review letter for your use. As part of the final platting process, Mn/DOT recommends the dedication of access control from the south line of the NW %. - NW '/. of section 26, T 116, R23 to B point B 15. ( refer to attached plat map for point numbers). Surface Water Runoff. A drainage permit will be required for this project. No additional runoff to Mn/DOT R/W will be allowed and all drainage patterns must be maintained. The proposed Pond B will not be allowed on Mn/DOT's right of way. Please provide the following: 1) A Grading Plan of the existing & proposed project, showing topography, with Mn/DOT's right of way clearly marked. 2) Drainage area maps for the proposed project showing both existing and proposed drainage areas and flows (with flow arrows (including the direction of pipe flow)). 3) Storm sewer plans and pond plans, with flow arrows for all overland and conveyed water. 4) Hydraulic computations/modeling for both existing and proposed conditions (i.e., Hydro -CAD input assumptions, calibration data, results for 10 and 100 year storm events). Please submit any further documentation electronically as Adobe Acrobat (.pdf), and HydroCAD (.hc) files. If plans change, you must resubmit for review. The electronic model and pdf file can be emailed to iulie.whitcher(a),dot.state.mn.us. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Julie Whitcher (651-634-2080) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources Engineering section. Traffic Noise: Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding Mn/DOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design section at (651) 582-1293. Permits: Any work within or impacting Mn/DOT Right of Way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at the following URL: www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsuv/utility . Please note that permits will not be issued until the plat is approved by Mn/DOT, and conditions have been agreed to. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of Mn/DOT's Metro Permits Section. Mn/DOT Review #P05 -080B 2 7/27/2006 As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. Thank you for including the electronic .pdf's with your submittal. It aids in our ability to locate the files in a more timely manner should you need to call with questions, etc. If submitting revised plans, please include a brief narrative identifying what revisions have been made, etc. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions concerning this review at (651) 634-2083. Juanita Voigt �G Transportation Plarmer uI Enclosure: Mn/DOT Right of Way Plat No. 1043 M9 Wetland Mitigation Construction Plan for TH 212 Design Build (SP 1017-12) Copy: Roger Gustafson / Carver County Engineer John Freemyer / Carver County Surveyor Chris Moehrl / Westwood Professional Services Kevin Clark / Town and Country Homes Copies to Mn/DOT Metro Division files: Mn/DOT Division File C.S. 1017 Mn/DOT LGL File — City of Chanhassen Mn/DOT Review #P05 -080B 7/27/2006 LEGEND mog BOTTOM ELEV. 8680 EXISTING CONTOURS OUTLET ELEV, 869.5 2 YR STORM 870.39 10 YR STORM 871.16 PROPOSED CONTOURS 100 YR STORM 871.96 NWL 869.5 INSPECTION TRENCH (D PRESERVED WOODLAND INSPECTION TRENCH BUFFER 0 CONTRDLLEO ACCESS PRESERVED WOODLAND BUFFER A♦ N". ------------ CONSTRUCTION LIMITS24 Ov Ov f".; ...... ------- ------------------- — PROPOSED NWL SCALE IN FEET a RIGHT OF WAY A4� RIPRAP 3 RD STANDA DIRECTIONAL FLOW ARROW ------ t NIK CLEAR & GRUB AREA—,ZZ, % CLEAR & GRUB TREE 1 -tial RAI `v ;Ili t it'L �F- CHT OF WAY -7 "INSW C Til ONI!jAtNCR z:.', x INSPIECTION TRENCH d SRIEET, 6 m SEE M9 CONSTRUCTION PLAN NOTES (SHEET IIOWMN9A) AND DETAILS (SHEETS IIOWMD9A & II0WMD98) SEE DRAINAGE PLAN FOR STORMWATER POND GRADING -7 INSPECTrWtF19Wj4., ----------------- 4— jJ E E.B. T H 21 Ef(Vb m 00" ENVIRON212 TALLY W. B. T. H. �Nsl m„DOT FM IfMlN TII)h s .... .. TH 212 DESIGN BUILD (SP 1017-12) ISHEET =".o� ff� FIM Num: JMTH" LWT% ...... M9 WETLAND MITIGATIONDATE 1 81 1 Ci,0 I &PPRI KV15IN t:!--�Zumbro rivercorist�toa CONSTRUCTION PLAN OF L lc.l. -1 5--o THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION I5 HEREBY DESIGNATING THE DEFINITE LOCATION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 312 FROM C.S.A.H. 14 TO O.S.A.H. 175 IN THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1an.n m Mle AIvf ypQ.e Of tM S.. or A'.tC OapaYYsif of Tra�Y' fTloa I. xPe)r crt1p. as M oTfol.i V., orf of pwtlm of vola T.H. 312 IMM iM Eeelmdf� pmtlm or s«fl.t M f 2Y 160.IIeeWO.li• esflmill.lf nroO.} =Imllfl.lf° $fefNs. Im 560.095..epflm rt I. fw x Tared Mvt t1 le neuvPy fe gprlro °I I frwe..' "o IYrtap .Imla 1N fnf of my of .did Trus[ ,10Z.;.. f. nv aq 11we flv wlul.. CmMol or fla .a. Caovol 'A O, r x.. L.1- x.tT. of L,frof 84)Z•.•r PLAT 10-43 o.fldlt.tloodoll •e.<mlt WW ilalry rsval +rolt Cmo.l.. CrO elWda r epe I � � by Siam Y. W nl I I P.E. ` Be tro PraTw oa nfy mr.atT E xfvAY crtlfY 11Wf MI. Plot K. pfgTp : ey rndT ry alrM wpTVI.Im aM iM E WIr L:om..Y Lpq 5rrveyf upr Ms L.w er flr Siae eT Ylmyef., iM Mif plot at. rwulr�lle Ylrtw.ota S�rdlNw, Mlm Ifo. WS• .M lm f0.lf M°. I, .Mlm If1.1f aDJ. 2• uq.Mlm lfl.lf. 1M pTwl m10. f. oTr.dflY de.TIOM vM platYel Imat._'Adm tM DIa1, m. fMt tx. frmo..d rl�fyr-py 0e1nOTY lira.�.q/�.--��Lf/I/YL�.e/f/I1Rv1.I9,, ifw CAwlTr.°Y 1jAAaT]��•�' SJfL 2ii�I •p_^S=•+�Y Le RD 1. hail Lloron. xa. pole xwOT Ol.o-lm orale Llo�°'rotleE La°rtNISWfsyTfidt miMr1°tMYlo,� e1 iM Stvf. of Ywota°1in°Otar a�� s'a:lr'On..mef°t. Q. [m.'r.°droi'y°alam MI. plat. ttot alI f Iwv. pe/I ptlTMIY plme. ®Ynwr m tnl. plot• M.t CrtI11 W,w .f Looallm 10- tfe mn. P �I a. Lm0 Slrvay oamrs eN n m MI. plat T. m TI le In iM Cgf��y Rmord—f M}Ic If r.ylrea Y nwat. StalUlae• ♦Im 160.151 Pelf fM Lovity SWs pHle. c.-rfrra .r 0 G e S. Soffit/a Llome.... W. YYMT DI.Irot OHlm RIGHT CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS Sfalm Llm M PTel Mmr 33/ WTff Lln. Ams. c.trdl v.f.enm Ll.. Ao.ev W.nlnO— —2 6EN �o— ° FaprtY LIB Cd.f Yaruvlf RI9 97"ol �. yrof 21n. 2 In. O.O.T. I—TW .,tn . 13 Exmbp O.O.T. wERN un. 3/4• O.O.T. Arm Pm xolane omf Irm Y.r.�r ®OO Rn - CmmBwNfTYSfpro W..flf Prlrat. E.TQC _' Q W° Cmr �/ T..,_ y ET.fnf SEI/4 NEI/4 METMICES SMINS TO FEET IEE, 20 STE.I ME ExfcT VA M. YLLE Ix'EST pomm�g 1. SEA w RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTIONS 26 4 27 AT QUARTER CORNER j \ By BO A Add amT'L PARCEL OWNER LOCATION TA.. Lmall m �4 a m � / \ _ Ad. rt. MIO[ a Lw 60 PETERSON-JACOUES FARM 4WI/4 NWI/4 2063915 16991 526 12-01-0912-01-07FEE R20f2 TO 94] ADJOINS PLAT 10-21 LAND COMPANY LLC SEI/4 NEI/4 m _______.Im4.10' yuan___________ LIMESTONE MONOYENT AT SECTION CORNER CARVER COWITY COORDINATES N=553092.313 1750612.162 D 83(1996) NARN NOIEi R/9 M 1/16 LINE r BS TO So 89 • BID CITY T.E. PAR. 60 V 0 20' 4 B6 eu ° I SE1/4-NE1/4 B7 X60 m� SW1/4-NEI/4 € O'B.R.E.PAR.60 6 `,sp• S � A PROPERTY LITE ; es CAST IRON MONUMENT V PARCEL 60 AT QUARTER CORNER j \ By BO A IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, T.116 N., R.23 W., 261275 u N., R.23 W.. �4 a m � / \ 644 ` r 60 ____3ef4se• gaff °4•____• , Rn M vls LINE 82043mi[-.4] To RN R20f2 TO 94] ADJOINS PLAT 10-21 maMTT L[rE CAST IRON MONUMENT AT QUARTER CORNER NW1/4-NWI/4 PAR. 60 OF / N PARCEL 60 SWI/4-NWI/4 C.S.A.H. 80. 14 PARCEL 60 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 10-43 CONTROL SECTION NO. 1017(312=260)902 IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, T.116 N., R.23 W., IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, T.116 N., R.23 W.. IN THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, T.116 N., R.23 W., CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA A AMENDMENT _TO PLAT 10-20, PARCEL GO- LI iNMTxNE SEC 2f SANDSTONE MONUMENT AT SECTION CORNER I I CAST IRON MONUMENT AT QUARTER CORNER I bN. R2 NOT TO B2a1} �•� .0. nAT ID -A l]]].Op' }TI•Sf'IS• _ —� 1 ]01.23' T`• �� }TI•Sf'II• xIXTN IIIE SEC. 23 c cd. ....._.. _. _ `�--- 21175.55' 269.59'.0•------' 20 E%]STINO ACCESS 1 0 SH m y 4 I FROM Bz015 TO R21 A5 SROM ES nTVE AccesscMTRa ^'1nU'� ,RM els To WzplT I aAS �Lma.�Vg'�Ex 167 v n, `ttlRN Adi R/9 M l,lf LEIS €m W \! / 846 VV ` `` en Tp els FL of OUTLOT A •ERISTIMe IfGESs C(NIIM. 815 a / FROM 846 TO B49 AS ER%N 9� �ZpG NW1/4-NEI/4 /NE1/4-NW1/4 B21 ^ ZpN s x P� O a, J �iV 9 IME• M M 1/I6 LINE -60 60� -- -- £ B22 e2z TO .3 CHANHASSEN B2 — ESTATE. f[¢Ss SEA. -` FEos AT 1/I1m LITE A5 Max 850 B49 11 2c �QJ SE1/4-NWI/4 PARCEL 263 o.A 10 B'S B52 BSI t RaP2Rn LENS q/.�T I -EY,sT. ,. x. ]l2 _J ,5• ROAp FASEIX TD �101ki � TxE Cln 6 (fIYWAS.fEN EY` 5 MER oac aaM i 9 Bu - SW1/4-NE1/4 ls• 824 Ii/ta• 263 . P RIGHT OF WAY PREVIOUSLY ACQUIRED »• By METES AND BgMpS DESCRIPTIO! $ �fo• 3A f5 X30. BLOCK 3 LT AM TO. NOTE. Rn M MARTO B2 IS, mi Ed m PARS' 6 A� '• T O iO PRYLNEET vdvvl ¢EASEMENT To 32 cwvm COUNTY m ..54m m \ '` P5 PARCEL 6 m : M B 61F PARCEL / 5 .a .Tn _ 61H SURVEY STANDARDS a E. Te plat varUY, a21 ro,t1Y. pq el.talu. T OYM m Mrs Lun1Y rnf°ImM1 oY.ta z. Tiro 0=141 Yna1t. YUY1 m ml. plat Iwe Iw1 rlele meON rf IacTlm. [IY .Ivtlre di ratan fT M. o.m,t peltlm If 0. 101st. 3. TIY voi mra lMw .Ibm in aro m,mrl Te OmM m to" N mtrawl mrlral vamlta. 4. FT Offal la of MI. At/ Y ...t m S .S" Smtlm at Me YrrMaotp p,pTironf or Traxprtdtim• METRO WELT,a0ff.N VALLEY .. a1m.TIM AND SAID CGKASEM Plat mlroltrr.drd ort.Ad To tM Canty COTdlmte Sratw aIM 0 clods. e pZ. 0 eeom°e do.r •MID KRTN•. Not dretagw or. dr. IvpH1a. ual . aO.N. LOT/BLOaCY, LINEEAST-MST 1/4 LZK-\•nEaA"T'Ot/ B28 __ - 4530.40' 205('54• RmERTT LINE CAST INON REFERENENMTD DOC. NO. 444 858B POSY �:� 26125 OFFICE OF COUNTY REC / CARVER COUNTY, MINNE SOUTH U. SEE. x 35 la '�` " i 4 I HEREBY CERTIFY THA 35 HAS BEEN FILED IN TH CAST IRON MONUMENT S, AT QUARTER CORNER �Y� 2001, CAST IRON PLAT NO. 10-43 REFERENCE MONUMENT C.S. 10171312=260)902 Liberty on Bluff Creek Preliminary Wetland Impacts and Replacement May 31, 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Wetlands were delineated in the field using the methodology set forth in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Delineated wetland boundaries were accepted by the City of Chanhassen. Based on preliminary analysis of wetland impacts, site development is expected to result in about 50,518 square feet of wetland fill distributed among nine locations in seven wetland basins. The average wetland impact area is approximately 5,600 square feet (0.13 acre). The current proposal involves replacing wetland impacts on the Jeurissen property in accordance with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act and the Federal Clean Water Act. Based on the wetland impact proposed, the project would require approximately 50,518 square feet of New Wetland Credit (NWC) wetland creation and 50,518 square feet of upland buffer or stormwater ponding Public Value Credit (PVC). It is anticipated that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will require 1.5 to 1 NWC wetland replacement, which amounts to 75,777 square feet of wetland creation. The concept below shows the proposed wetland creation areas located near Bluff Creek on the Jeurissen property. Preliminary analysis indicates that these areas could accommodate approximately 77,000 square feet of newly created wetland. --- r NN L �\ 4UFf WEEK SFJ �� /1 �Q- �ecoa MGR04. Y T I ..i'✓``�� 1µE 41w1� Location of Wetland Replacement Near Bluff Creek on the Jeurissen property. FAX COVER SHEET 14 F� Date: z �/ 0 - - Company: / , � �5 7700 Market Blvd P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 General Phone: 952-227-1100 Administrative Fax: 952-227-1110 Bldg/Inspections Fax: 952-227-1190 Engineering Fax: 952-227-1170 Park/Recreation Fax: 952-227-1110 Planning Fax: 952-227-1110 Public Works Fax: 952-227-1310 Recreation Center Fax: 952-227-1404 Web Address: www.ci.chanhassemmmus Attention: Fax Number: 7^�L� S--�� 7') V i — Direct Dial No: 9-� , Z � 7-7 /iZ Sending 2L -pages, including cover page. ❑ El Please find the information you requested Please review and call me Please call to confirm receipt of this fax If you do not receive all pages, or are experiencing other problems in transmission, please call the sender at his or her direct dial number. TOWN & February 3, 2006 Mr. Robert Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard _M11-- COUNTRY HOMES a K Hw ian' Company CITU OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 0 3 2006 P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEP7 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Revised Preliminary Plat Submittal - Liberty at Creekside Dear Mr. Generous: Town & Country Homes, a K. Hovnanian Company is pleased to submit the revised preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. The following items are enclosed with this submittal: • 16 full size copies of the preliminary plat • 111x17 copy of the preliminary plat • 1 full size copy of the cross section highlighting views throughout the development • 1 11x17 copy of the cross section highlighting views throughout the development • 1 copy of the Premier and Concord product description Town & Country Homes proposes the Liberty at Creekside development consisting of 146 housing units. The proposed homes at Creekside will consist of Town & Country Homes' Premier and Concord product lines. A brief product description of each housing type is enclosed for your information. In addition to the information contained in that description, the Concord product line offers a private balcony option for individual units that overlook a common courtyard. The Premier product line offers a private deck option to the rear of each unit. The site has been designed to preserve views for each resident from north to south overlooking the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Town & Country Homes looks forward to partnering with the city of Chanhassen to obtain the necessary approvals to facilitate the development of Liberty at Creekside. Thank you for your continued cooperation on this exciting project and we look forward to meeting with the Planning Commission on March 7, 2006. If you have any questions or would like to schedule a meeting to discuss these plans once they have been reviewed by city staff, please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-253-0460. Very truly yours, Sifta� Community Planning Manger Enclosure(s) cc: Kevin Clark, Vice President of Land Development SCANNED Rick Janssen, Vice President of Land Acquisition Robert Nordby, Assistant Project Manager for Land Development 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 • Eden Prairie. Minnesota 55344 • Phone 952-944-3455 • Fax 952-944-3437 • w townandcoun"homesrri Minnesota Builder #20539403 S. #20543466 Page 1 of 1 Generous, Bob From: Generous, Bob Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:13 AM To: 'kclark@townandcountryhomesmn.com' Cc: 'ssiders@townandcountryhomesmn.com'; Aanenson, Kate Subject: Liberty at Creekside Kevin: As part of the Liberty at Creekside development, Town and Country Homes did not transfer density from the south side of the creek to the developed area on the north side of the creek. The city originally calculated the overall net density for the project at 4.7 units per acre. This calculation only removes Outlot A, existing wetlands, slopes in excess of 30% and right-of-way. The density of the development north of Bluff Creek, at 7.28 units per acre, would still be within the Residential — Medium Density Land Use for the property. In calculating the density north of Bluff Creek, I subtracted 0.43 acres of Outlot A, 12.64 acres of Outlot D, 0.44 acres of Outlot E and 2.44 acres of right-of-way from the 36.01 acres within the site, which leaves 20.06 acres. The Bluff Creek Overlay Ordinance states: "Density clustering shall be allowed as a tool to facilitate cluster development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Density clustering may be used in areas where portions of the site are unsuitable for development because of the location of the primary zone. Density clustering shall not be allowed for areas that are otherwise considered unbuildable due to wetlands, lakes and other areas not suitable for building purposes. In areas where density clustering is applicable, density may be transferred to unconstrained parts of the site within land included in the secondary zone, subject to the restrictions of this ordinance, and within land lying outside of identified zone areas." If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or Renerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Bob 5/31/2006 Oehme, Paul From: Jon Chiglo [Jon.Chiglo@dot.state.mn.us] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 4:05 PM To: jeff.fox@gaivadock.com Subject: Re: Please Respond to second set of questions, to help clarifythe S.E. road. Jeff, the existing access to this property will not be eliminated by the 212 project. Since the existing access is being maintained, no additional access points will be constructed by Mn/DOT to this property. Modifications to this roadway in the future through Mn/DOT right of way would be requested through the Mn/DOT permits office. Jon Chiglo, P.E. Highway 212 Design Build Project Manager Phone #: 952-368-5620 jon. chiglo@dot. state. mn.us >>> "Jeff Fox" <jeff.fox@galvadock.com> 04/10/06 2:02 PM >>> Jon, pertaining to the farm service road providing access to the Jeurissen property to the Southeast that hwy 212 will bridge over: 1) Will the crossing over the creek remain in place 2) For the portion of the farm service road that passes through MNDOT's right of way could the width of the current farm service road possibly be expanded to accomadate an upgraded neighborhood road with a minimum of 30-50 foot right of way and is the clearance under the bridge approximately 20 feet. 3)Is it MNDOT's position that this access point fulfills its obligation to provide access to the Jeurissen parcel so it is not land locked by the taking for the highway 212 project 4) When the highway project is completed will the service road be left in place and still be available to provide access to the Jeurissen parcel from Pioneer Trail ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Chiglo" <Jon.Chiglo@dot.state.mn.us> To: <jeff.fox@galvadock.com> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 1:00 PM Subject: Re: A review of our meeting last Thursday evening Jeff, I would say that numbers 1 and 2 are accurate, but this sentence, "MNDOT 's policy is not to give up property it has acquired in conjunction with HWY 212 as it has the need for it within this project. It does not intent to allow any additional roads to cross through the MNDOT right of way in this case the wetland if any other possible route exists to provide access to this property." is not something we discussed. We are working with the city discussing the option of allowing the use of this property, but we have not agreed to anything yet. Jon Chiglo, P.E. Highway 212 Design Build Project Manager Phone #: 952-368-5620 jon.chiglo@dot.state.mn.us >>> "Jeff Fox" <jeff.fox@galvadock.com> 04/10/06 12:50 PM >>> April 10, 2006 To: Jon Chiglo Re: Summary of our meeting Thursday, April 6, 2006 1 CITY OF CIIANNSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax 952 227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952 227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952227.1130 Fax 952.227. 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhasserra n.us September 9, 2005 Chris Moerhl Westwood Professional Services 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Liberty at Creekside Dear Chris: Attached is a copy of the preliminary plan for MnDOT's wetland mitigation plan north of the development. We do not have it in electronic format. The north -south roadway should snake between the toe of the bluff and the wetland mitigation area. You should contact Paul Oehme, City Engineer, at (952) 227-1169 to coordinate this facet of the project I hope this helps in preparing your plan. Let me know if I can be of further assistance. Since Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure The City of Chanhassen -A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Date: June 29, 2005 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director Subject: Request for Rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision with Variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 30 lots, 1 outlot, and public right-of-way; and Site Plan Approval for 138 townhouses. The property is located east of Audubon Road and north of Pioneer Trail (1500 Pioneer Trail). Applicant: Town & Country Homes Planning Case: 05-24 Liberty at Creekside The above-described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on June 17, 2005. The 60 -day review period ends August 16, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on August 2, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than July 22, 2005. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources —Julie Ekman 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company Qwest or SprintfUnited) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 13. Chaska School District 112 14. SouthWest Metro Transit KANNED Location Map Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen C,,, :A.3 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: http//www.rileypurgatorybluffcreek.org January 4, 2006 Mr. Kevin Clark Town and County Homes 7615 Smetana Lane; Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Permit #2005-27: Liberty at Creekside: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Clark: Legal Advisor. Krebsbach & Haik 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineering Advisor: Barr Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 632-2600 Fax: 952 632-2601 The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District received your land grading and alteration plans and signed permit application on July 15, 2005. The District is required to approve, deny, or extend your permit within 60 days of receipt of the completed application. The District has reviewed the permit and determined that the application is incomplete. The District requires the following information to complete your application: The project must receive Planning Commission and City Council approval prior to the District taking action on the permit application. The District cannot act on the permit until your application is complete. Your application will be considered complete and formally received, upon receipt of the information required by the District's Engineering Advisor. The application will be presented to the Board of Managers at their regularly scheduled meeting on the fust Wednesday of each month. The District will act accordingly within 60 days of the completed application. If you have any questions about the required information, please call the District's Engineer, Robert Obermeyer, at 952-832-2857. Sincerely, Obert C. Obermeye c: Paul Haik Mark Dillon Lori Haak�X Chris Moehrl ::ODMA\PCDOCStDOCS\246120\6 Board of Managers Howard Peterson Mark Dillon Conrad Fiskness Philip Wright Erin Ahola �- Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District aTM Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 July 27, 2005 Bob Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Liberty at Creekside Mn/DOT Review P05-080 North of New TH 212, East of Audubon Road Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1017 Dear Mr. Generous: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following issues: Access Control: ■ The access shown on this layout at TH 212 Right of Way has been eliminated It is our understanding that although the location map submitted from the city shows an access onto Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14), that there will be no southerly access from this site. Rather, the access will be provided via a new east— west collector to the north of the site that connects from Audubon Road to proposed Powers Blvd (alignment not yet finalized.) In the future, please include access information with submittals. Please direct questions regarding - this issue to Lynn Clarkowski, Mn/DOT's Area Engineer, at 651-634-2103, or Mary Lacho, Mn/DOT's TH 212 Design Engineer, at 952-368-5610 or mary.lacho(a)dot.state.mn.us . Drainage: ■ A drainage permit will be required for this project. No additional runoff to Mn/DOT R/W will be allowed and all drainage patterns must be maintained. Please provide the following: 1) A Grading Plan of the existing & proposed project,. showing topography, with Mn/DOT's right of way clearly marked. 2) Drainage area maps for the proposed project showing both existing and proposed drainage areas and flows (with flow arrows). 3) Storm sewer plans and pond plans, with flow arrows for all overland and conveyed water. N '41�} . f 4) Hydraulic computations/modeling for both existing and proposed conditions (i.e., Hydro -CAD input assumptions, calibration data, results for 10 and 100 year storm events). Please submit any further documentation electronically as Adobe Acrobat (.pdf), and HydroCAD (.he) files. If plans change, you must resubmit for review. The electronic model and pdf file can be emailed to Julie.whitcherA,dot.state.mn.us. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Julie Wbitcher (651-634-2080) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources Engineering section. Permits: ■ Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at www.dot:state.mn.us/ a p/utility. . Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of Mn/DOT's Metro Permits Section. Right of Way/Surveys: ■ The "Existing Mn/DOT R/W" needs to be clearly labeled, and the existing access control needs to be shown (and have symbol shown in legend). Please direct any questions regarding this issue to Bruce Wetherbee of Mn/DOT's Metro West Surveys at 763-797-3110. Electronic Document Request: ■ As a final request, could you please send an electronic .pdf file copy of your plan submittal for our record keeping purposes to ivanita.voiatOtdot.state.mn.us Please refer to Mn/DOT Review #P05-080 / Liberty at Creekside / CHN when emailing the .pdf file. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing 4) Hydraulic computations/modeling for both existing and proposed conditions (i.e., Hydro -CAD input assumptions, calibration data, results for 10 and 100 year storm events). Please submit any further documentation electronically as Adobe Acrobat (.pdf), and HydroCAD (.hc) files. If plans change, you must resubmit for review. The electronic model and pdf file can be emailed to iulie.whitcher(d)dot.state.mn.us. Please direct questions concerning these .issues to Julie Whitcher (651-634-2080) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources Engineering section. Permits: ■ Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires -a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at www.dot:state.mn.ushecsun/utility. . Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of Mn/DOT's Metro Permits Section. Right of Way/Surveys: ■ The `Busting Mn/DOT R/W" needs to be clearly labeled, and the existing access control needs to be shown (and have symbol shown in legend). Please direct any questions regarding this issue to Bruce Wetherbee of Mn/DOT's Metro West Surveys at 763-797-3110. Electronic Document Request. ■ As a final request, could you please send an electronic .pdf file copy of your plan submittal for our record keeping purposes to ivanita.voietO.dot.state.mn.us Please refer to Mn/DOT Review #P05-080 / Liberty at Creekside / CHN when emailing the .pdf file. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT-Metro Division ---------- Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651)634-2083. V 14�e Juanita Voigt Transportation Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson / Carver County Engineer John Freemyer / Carver County Surveyor Westwood Professional Services Town and Country Homes r. . Blind Paper Copy to: Metro LGL files — Chanhassen Metro Division File —CS 1017 Blind copy via GroupWise to: Ann Braden — Met Council Tod Sherman — Program Management John lsackson — Right of Way Keith Van Wagner — Permits Julie Whitcher — Water Resources Engineering Lynn Clarkowski — Area Engineer Mary Lacho — TH 212 Design Engineer Richard Scarrow — Design Chris Moehrl, P.E. Westwood Professional Services 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Town and Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suit 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 K MEBpTq Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 March 6, 2006 Bob Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Liberty at Creek Side Mn/DOT Review #1305-080A North of new 212, East of Audubon Road Chanhassen, Carver County Mn/DOT Control Section 1017 Dear Mr. Generous: GI f Yur 05 -,=�)L/ The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above -referenced plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03 Subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following comments: Survey Please identify B -corners and show in place monumentation on the final plat. Please direct survey questions to Bruce Wetherbee (763-797-3110) of Mn/DOT's Metro Survey Section. Right of Way Mn/DOT Right of Way needs to be clearly labeled on the final plat. As part of the final platting process, Mn/DOT recommends the dedication of access control on the southeasterly plat boundary that abuts up to Mn/DOT Right of Way Plat 10-20. Please direct questions regarding Right of Way to Doug Nelson (651-582-1271) of Mn/DOT's Metro Right of Way Section. Surface Water Runoff A drainage permit will be required for this project. It appears that the storm sewer for the site drains to the southeast corner of the development and then would flow to Mn/DOT Right of Way. No increase in runoff (rates or volumes) to Mn/DOT Right of Way will be allowed. The consultant will need to submit drainage calculations for the 10 and 100 year event for both the existing and proposed conditions. Drainage area maps with the direction of flow (including the direction of pipes) should be submitted as well. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Julie Whitcher (651-634-2080) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources section. Traffic Noise Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards An equal opportunity employer established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding Mn/DOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design section at (651) 582-1293. Permits Any work within or impacting Mn/DOT Right of Way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at the following URL: www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/utiIity Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of Mn/DOT's Metro Permits Section. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please contact me at (651) 634-2083. Sincerely, Jonathan smond Transportation Planner Enclosure: Mn/DOT review letter dated July 27, 2005 Mn/DOT Review #P05 -080A 2 3/6/2006 Copy: Roger Gustafson / Carver County Engineer John Freemyer / Carver County Surveyor Westwood Professional Services Kevin Clark, Town and Country Homes Copies to Mn/DOT Metro Division files: Mn/DOT Division File C.S. 1017 Mn/DOT LGL File - City of Chanhassen Copies distributed via Groupwise: Tod Sherman Cindy Carlsson Buck Craig Lars Impola Ken Ljung Mary Lacho Bruce Wetherbee Doug Nelson Julie Whitcher Ann Braden / Metropolitan Council Chris Moehrl, P.E. Westwood Professional Services 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Kevin Clark Town and Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 John Freemyer Carver County Surveyor 11360 Highway 212 West PO Box 300 Cologne, MN 55322-0300 Roger Gustafson Carver County Engineer 11360 Highway 212 West PO Box 300 Cologne, MN 55322-0300 Mn/DOT Review #P05 -080A 3 3/6/2006 d Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 July 27, 2005 Bob Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147' Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Liberty at Creekside Mn/DOT Review POS -080 North of New TH 212, East ofAudubon Road Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1017 Dear Mr. Generous: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following issues: Access Control: ■ The access shown on this layout at TH 21.2 Right of Way has been eliminated It is our understanding that although the location map submitted from the city shows an access onto Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14), that there will be no southerly access from this site. Rather, the acccs$ will beprovided via a new east — west collector to the north of.the site that connects from Audubon Road to proposed Powers Blvd (alignment not yet finalized.) In the future, please include access information with submittals. Please direct questions regarding --- — - this issue to Lynn Clarkowski, MnMOT's Area Engineer, at 651-634-2103, or Mary Lacho, Mn/DOT's TH 212 Design Engineer, at 952-368-5610 or m .lacho dot.state.mn.us . Drainage: ■ A drainage permit will be required for this project. No additional runoff to Mn/DOT R/W will be allowed and all drainage patterns must be maintained. Please provide the following: 1) A Grading Plan of the existing & proposed project, showing topography, with Mn/DOT's right of way clearly marked 2) Drainage area maps for the proposed project showing both existing and proposed drainage areas and flows (with flow arrows). 3) Storm sewer plans and pond plans, with flow arrows for all overland and conveyed water. NI 4) Hydraulic computations/modeling for both existing and proposal conditions (i.e., Hydro -CAD input assumptions, calibration data, results for 10 and 100 year storm events). Please submit any further documentation electronically as Adobe Acrobat (.pdf), and HydroCAD (.hc) files. If plans change, you must resubmit for review. The electronic model and pdf file can be emailed to iulie.whitcheadotstate.mn.us. Please direct questions concerning these .issues to Julie Whitcher (651-634-2080) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources Engineering section. Permits: ■ Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires, a permit Permit forms are available from MYDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.ushecsup/utility . Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of Mu/DOT's Metro Permits Section. Right of Way/ Surveys: ■ The "Existing Mn/DOT R/W" needs to be clearly labeled, and the existing access control needs to be shown (and have symbol shown in legend). Please direct any questions regarding this issue to Bruce Wetherbee of Mn/DOT's Metro West Surveys at 763-797-3110. Electronic Document Request. ■ As a final request, could you please send an electronic .pdf file copy of your plan submittal for our record keeping purposes to ivanita.voigiRdot.state.mn.us Please refer to Mn/DOT Review #P05-080 / Liberty at Creekside / CHN when emailing the .pdf file. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT-Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing 4) Hydraulic computations/modeling for both existing and proposed conditions (i.e., Hydro -CAD input assumptions, calibration data, results for 10 and 100 year storm events). Please submit any further documentation electronically as Adobe Acrobat (.pdf), and HydroCAD.(.hc) files. If plans change, you must resubmit for review. The electronic model and pdf file can be emailed to "ulie.whitche dot.state.mmus. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Julie Whitcher (651-634-2080) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources Engineering section. Permits: ■ Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires- a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at www.dotstate.mn us/tecsup/utility . Please direct any questions regarding _ permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of Mn/DOT's Metro Permits Section. Right of Way/Surveys: ■ The "Existing Mn/DOT R/W" needs to be clearly labeled, and the existing access control needs to be shown (and have symbol shown in legend). Please direct any questions regarding this issue to Bruce Wetherbee of Mn/DOT's Metro West Surveys at 763-797-3110. Electronic Document Request. ■ As a final request, could you please send an electronic .pdf file copy of your plan submittal for our record keeping purposes to juanita-voiW@dot.state.mn.us Please refer to Mn/DOT Review #P05-080 / Liberty at Creekside / CHN when emailing the .pdf file. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT-Metro Division --.-------.._---._...__.------ Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651)634-2083. V 4 Juanita IT Transportation Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson / Carver County Engineer John Freemyer / Carver County Surveyor Westwood Professional Services Town and Country Homes Blind Paper Copy to: Metro LGL files - Chanhassen Metro Division File -CS 1017 Blind copy via GroupWise to: Ann Braden - Met Council Tod Sherman - Program Management John Lsackson - Right of Way Keith Van Wagner -Permits Julie Whitcher - Water Resources Engineering Lynn Clarkowski - Area Engineer Mary Lacho - TH 212 Design Engineer Richard Scarrow - Design Chris Moehrl, P.E. Westwood Professional Services 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Town and Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suit 180_ Eden Prairie, MN 55344 MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner FROM: DATE: Steven Torell, Building Official February 15, 2006 Review of Liberty at Creekside, Town & Country Homes. Planning Case: 05-24 I have reviewed the plans for above project and offer the following comments, which should be included in the conditions of approval: 1. Accessibility must be provided to all portions of the development and a percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. Further information is needed to determine these requirements. 2. The buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. The State of Minnesota is in the process of revising Chapter 1306 of the Minnesota State Building Code regarding fire protection systems. It is not yet entirely clear how these changes will affect residential construction. It is important that the developer meet with the Inspections Division prior to final design to determine what ramifications, if any, the new requirements will have on the project. 3. The buildings will be required to be designed by an architect and engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names and an addressing plan for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. 5. Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing any structures on the site. 6. A final grading plan and soils report must be to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 7. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one- hour fire -resistive construction. 8. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 9. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 10. The developer and or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. G/safety/st/memos/plan/residential/Liberty at Creekside 2 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: http//wwvv.rileypurgatorybluffcreek.org December 7, 2005 Mr. Kevin Clark Town and County Homes 7615 Smetana Lane; Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Permit #2005-27: Liberty at Creekside: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Clark: Legal Advisor: Krebsbach & Haik 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineering Advisor. Barr Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 RECEIVED DEC 12 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District received your land grading and alteration plans and signed permit application on July 15, 2005. The District is required to approve, deny, or extend your permit within 60 days of receipt of the completed application. The District has reviewed the permit and determined that the application is incomplete. The District requires the following information to complete your application: The project must receive Planning Commission and City Council approval prior to the District taking action on the permit application. The District cannot act on the permit until your application is complete. Your application will be considered complete and formally received, upon receipt of the information required by the District's Engineering Advisor. The application will be presented to the Board of Managers at their regularly scheduled meeting on the first Wednesday of each month. The District will act accordingly within 60 days of the completed application. If you have any questions about the required information, please call the District's Engineer, Robert Obermeyer, at 952-832-2857. Sincerely, obert C. Obermeyer c: Paul Haik Howard Peterson Lori Haak_,,/ Chris Moehrl ::0DMA\PCD0CS\D0CS\246120\5 Board of Managers Howard Peterson Mark Dillon Conrad Fiskness Philip Wright Erin Ahola \ IIIII TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES a IC Hovnanian' Company October 13, 2005 Mr. Bob Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Liberty at Creekside Dear Mr. Generous: RECEIVED OCT 14 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN As a follow up to our recent conversation, I am sending this letter requesting an extension for preliminary plat review for the Liberty at Creekside project. Town & Country Homes submitted those plans on June 17, 2005 and was subsequently granted an extension until November 1, 2005 under a separate request. By copy of this letter, I would request that you consider an extension of the city review period of the preliminary plat for an additional 30 days from November 1, 2005 to December 1, 2005. Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-253-0462. Sincerely, Kevin Clark Director of Land Development Town & Country Homes a. K. Hovnanian Company 7615 Smetana Lane. Suite 180 • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • Phone 952-944-3455 • Fax 952-944-3437 • www.townandcountryhomesmn.com Minnesota Builder #20539403 S #20543466 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: http//www.dleypurgatorybluffcreek.org October 5, 2005 Mr. Kevin Clark Town and County Homes 7615 Smetana Lane; Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Permit #2005-27: Liberty at Creekside: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Clark: Legal Advisor. Krebsbach & Haik 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineering Advisor: Bart Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 RECFlvcn JL1 14 %u05 CITY OF CHANHASSEN The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District received your land grading and alteration plans and signed permit application on July 15, 2005. The District is required to approve, deny, or extend your permit within 60 days of receipt of the completed application. The District has reviewed the permit and determined that the application is incomplete. The District requires the following information to complete your application: The project must receive Planning Commission and City Council approval prior to the District taking action on the permit application. The District cannot act on the permit until your application is complete. Your application will be considered complete and formally received, upon receipt of the information required by the District's Engineering Advisor. The application will be presented to the Board of Managers at their regularly scheduled meeting on the fust Wednesday of each month. The District will act accordingly within 60 days of the completed application. If you have any questions about the required information, please call the District's Engineer, Robert Obermeyer, at 952-832-2857. Sincerely, obe C.0rme,e Y c: Paul Haik Howard Peteyson Lori Haak`/ ::ODMA\PCD(XS\DOCS VA612o\2 Board of Managers Howard Peterson Mark Dillon Conrad Fiskness Philip Wright Erin Ahola Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: http//www.rileypurgatorybluffcreek.org September 7, 2005 Mr. Kevin Clark Town and County Homes 7615 Smetana Lane; Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Permit #2005-27: Liberty at Creekside: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Clark: Legal Advisor Krebsbach & Haik 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineering Advisor: Bart Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District received your land grading and alteration plans and signed permit application on July 15, 2005. The District is required to approve, deny, or extend your permit within 60 days of receipt of the completed application. The District has reviewed the permit and determined that the application is incomplete. The District requires the following information to complete your application: The project must receive Planning Commission and City Council approval prior to the District taking action on the permit application. The District cannot act on the permit until your application is complete. Your application will be considered complete and formally received, upon receipt of the information required by the District's Engineering Advisor. The application will be presented to the Board of Managers at their regularly scheduled meeting on the first Wednesday of each month. The District will act accordingly within 60 days of the completed application. If you have any questions about the required information, please call the District's Engineer, Robert Obermeyer, at 952-832-2857. Sincerely, f/ Robert C. Obermeye� c: Paul Haik Howard Peterson Lori Haak,, ::ODM A\PCDOCS\DOC S\246120\2 Board of Managers Howard Peterson Mark Dillon Conrad Fiskness Philip Wright Erin Ahola TOWN & A RY HOMES Minnesota Division August 22, 2005 Mr. Bob Generous 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Liberty at Creekside Dear Mr. Generous: Town & Country Homes submitted our Liberty at Creekside plans for preliminary plat review on June 17'", 2005. This letter represents a written request to extend the city review period of the Preliminary Plat for an additional 60 days from September 1, 2005 to November 1 st, 2005. Please contact me at 952-253-0462 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Kevin M. Clark Director of Land Development Town & Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (952) 944-3455 • Fax (952) 944-3437 MN Builder License #9137 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: http//www.rileypurgatorybluffcreek.org August 3, 2005 Mr. Kevin Clark Town and County Homes 7615 Smetana Lane; Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Permit #2005-27: Liberty at Creekside: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Clark: Legal Advisor. Krebsbach & Haik 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineenng Advisor: Bart Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 Communication Lexicon Communications Consultant: 15246 65th Place North Maple Grove, MN 55311 763-557-5244 - The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District received your land grading and alteration plans and signed permit application on July 15, 2005. The District is required to approve, deny, or extend your permit within 60 days of receipt of the completed application. The District has reviewed the permit and determined that the application is incomplete. The District requires the following information to complete your application: The project must receive Planning Commission and City Council approval prior to the District taking action on the permit application. The District cannot act on the permit until your application is complete. Your application will be considered complete and formally received, upon receipt of the information required by the District's Engineering Advisor. The application will be presented to the Board of Managers at their regularly scheduled meeting on the first Wednesday of each month. The District will act accordingly within 60 days of the completed application. If you have any questions about the required information, please call the District's Engineer, Robert Obermeyer, at 952-832-2857. Sincerely, ober C.Obermeye) c: Paul Haik Howard Peterson Lori Haak✓ ::ODM A\PCDOCS\DOCS\246120\ 1 Board of Managers Howard Peterson Perry Forster Conrad Fiskness Philip Wright Susan Scribner Park 8 Recreation I have reviewed the request for rezoning of the above project. In order to comply with Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire Recreation Center code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The plan review is based upon available 2310 Coulter Boulevard information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted, the Phone: 952.227.1400 appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning a 1. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs CITY OF must either be removed from site or chipped. CIIANIIASSEN Fax: 952.227.1110 MEMORANDUM Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once 7700 Markel Boulevard construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 PO Boz 147 Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. Chanhassen, MN 55317 TO: Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director Administration ne: 952,227.11 Phone: 952,227.1100 FROM: Mark Li Fire Marshal ttfin, Fax: 952.227.1110 3. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the Senior Center DATE: July 26, 2005 Building Inspections driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. g p Phone: 952.227 .1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 SUBJ: Request for rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R, Subdivision www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us with variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 30 lots, one outlot Engineering and public right of ways, and site plan approval for 138 townhouses. Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 The property is located east of Audubon Road and north of Pioneer Trail (1500 Pioneer Trail). Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952227.1110 Planning Case: 05-24 Liberty at Creekside Park 8 Recreation I have reviewed the request for rezoning of the above project. In order to comply with Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire Recreation Center code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The plan review is based upon available 2310 Coulter Boulevard information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted, the Phone: 952.227.1400 appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning a 1. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs Natural Remurces must either be removed from site or chipped. Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 2. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once Public Works construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 1591 Park Road Minnesota Fire code Section 501.4. Phone: 952 227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 3. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the Senior Center imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather Phone: 952.227,1125 Faz:952.227.1110 driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. g p Web site 4. Fire apparatus access road and water supplies for fire protection is required to be www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. The City at Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a champing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Ms. Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director July 26, 2005 Page 2 5. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, Cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 6. Submit street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. gAsafetyMl\plrev05-24 CARVER 96M CONSERVATION DISTRICT J;ng Ca,.` 219 East Frontage Road gas � Waconia, MN 55387 0 d Phone: 952-442-5101 044ty ve Fax: 952-442-5497 http://%cNcw.co.carver.mn.us/SWCD/SWCD main.htnil Mission Statement. To provide leadership in conservation and teach stewardship of the soil, water, and related resources through a balancett cooperative program that protects, restores, and improves those resources. July 15, 2005 Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Liberty at Creekside Ms. Aanenson: The SWCD has taken the opportunity to review the Liberty at Creekside development. The plan reviewed is dated 06/17/05. Please review and consider the following comments and suggestions regarding the SWPPP and erosion control and sediment controls. SWPPP A SWPPP is needed for the development and must be completed prior to applying for the NPDES permit. It is recommended the SWPPP be submitted to the City and SWCD for review prior to final approval. Erosion Control 1. A stable EOF for the pond is needed. The EOF could consist of riprap and geotextile fabric or a turf re -enforcement mat (a permanent erosion control blanket). A typical detail is needed on the plan. 2. It is unclear how access to wetland mitigation areas will be done. It appears that a temporary creek crossing may be needed unless access can be gained from the west or south. The access and all erosion controls / restoration should be noted on the plan. 3. The storm sewer extension is planned outside of perimeter controls. Additional erosion control notes are needed on the plan; erosion control blanket will likely needed within 24 hours of installation. Sediment Control 1. Curbside inlet control details are needed. Wimco-type inlet controls should be used and installed within 24 hours of installation. 2. Typical building lot controls should be shown on the plan. These controls should include perimeter controls (silt fence), rock driveways, street sweeping, inlet control and temporary mulch after final grade and prior to issuing the CO. 3. The proposed storm water pond should be used as a temporary sediment basin during mass grading. The pond should be excavated prior to disturbing up gradient areas. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Diversion berms / ditches may be needed to divert water to the pond and a temporary pond outlet is needed. The outlet could be a temporary perforated standpipe and rock cone. A detail is needed. Additional temporary sediment basins may be needed or an alternate location may be needed depending upon site conditions during rough grading. Stormwater Manizement 1. An adequate easement for pond access for maintenance purposes is needed and should be shown on the plan. 2. It is recommended that the ultimate outlet from the site to Bluff Creek be adjusted to discharge water parallel to the creek flow; presently the outlet is shown to discharge water perpendicular to the flow and could increase bank erosion of the creek. The outlet should be turned to the SE to align with the creek. If there are any questions or if I can be of further assistance please contact the SWCD office. Sincerely, Aaron Mlynek, CPESC Urban Conservation Technician c. Lori Haak, City of Chanhassen (email) MEMORANDUM CITYOF TO: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director CHMNSEN 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director PO Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: July 11, 2005 Administration Phone: 952.2271100 SUBJ: Request for rezoning of property from A-2 to PUD -R; Subdivision Fax: 952.2271110 with variances of approximately 36.01 acres into 30 lots, 1 outlot, Building Inspections and public right-of-way; and Site Plan Approval for 138 townhouses. Phone: 952.2271180 Applicant: Town and Country Homes Fax: 952 227.1190 Engineering PARKS Phone: 952.227.1190 Fax: 952.2271170 The proposed Liberty at Creekside subdivision is located within the 2005 MUSA Finance area at the edge of Bluff Creek and is proposed to be developed into 138 residential Phone: 952.227.1140 town homes. The city's Comprehensive Park Plan calls for one acre of usable park Fax: 952.227 1110 space to be set aside for every 75 residents. Liberty at Creekside, as proposed, will Park & Recreation result in an estimated 350 new residents moving into Chanhassen. Therefore this Phone: 952.227.1120 subdivision generates the need for 4 % acres of new parkland. However, the Fax: 952.227 1110 Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that building a small park in every residential Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard subdivision is undesirable and would result in an unmanageable municipal ark g P P Phone 952.227.1400 system. To this end, the plan calls for neighborhood parks to be centrally located Fax: 952.2271404 within housing regions with a maximum distance of one mile between Planning & neighborhood parks. Natural Resources Phone: 952.2271130 This pooling of resources and land in order to centrally locate parks in specific park Fax: 952.227.1110 service areas results in the efficient use of limited capital and long term maintenance Public Works dollars. In the case of the Liberty at Creekside proposal, the City is planning to 1591 Park Road service neighborhood park needs at a location less than s/2 mile to the north and Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 west. Therefore, the City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication as a condition of this subdivision. Senior Center Phone: 952.227 1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 TRAH S Web site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us A variety of pedestrian improvements should be incorporated into the proposed Liberty at Creekside plat. Foremost is a ten -foot wide asphalt trail to be constructed adjacent to and paralleling the Bluff Creek corridor. This important trail will need to be constructed on the north side of Bluff Creek at this location. This trail is currently not reflected in the plans submitted by the applicant. Additional pedestrian The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gieal place to live, work, and play. Liberty at Creekside Applicant: Town and Country Homes July 11, 2005 Page 2 trails, sidewalks and trail connectors also need to be incorporated into the project as required. The planning and construction and financing of these pedestrian improvements are the responsibility of the applicant. The City will reimburse Town and Country Homes the cost of construction materials only for the ten -foot wide Bluff Creek Trail. G:\plan\2005 Planning Cases\05-11 Liberty at Bluff Creek\park comments.doc O-L TOWN & Y HOMES C-1 Minnesota Division June 17. 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Liberty at Creekside Preliminary Plat Submittal Dear Ms. Aanenson: CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUN 17 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Town & Country Homes is pleased to submit for Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review, and PUD Application for Liberty at Creekside. We would like to take this opportunity to thank city staff, planning commission, and city council for their feedback on the concepts for our community. We anticipate being on the agenda for the July 19th Planning Commission Meeting. Please let me know if any earlier dates become available. We look forward to beginning this formal approval process. Please contact Krista Novack at 952-253-044 and/or me at 952.253.0464 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ronald G. Fuchs Development Entitlement Manager— Land Development 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 SCANNED (952) 944-3455 • Fax (952) 944-3437 MN Builder License #9137 Map Print Output Page 1 of 1 Carver County GIS Mapping Application ,low T r r r 11=p-_re3;:.; .; �3r�et Cnmtys QS bffre '�1Sft Legend R Tnt FEU Fkodq,in U H*.." W H;g .a„ Map Created on: r Csµ 7-21-2005 ,,,,,Carver ftrt.I. County F .l R 3001 L I This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is L---1 - - - not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. http://156.99.124.167/website/parcel_intemeLrecaphnap.asp 7212005 Location Map Liberty at Creekside Planning Case No. 05-24 1500 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen Schematic Concept Plan FOX — Dorsey Properties Liberty at Creekside Preliminary Plat Extension Analysis Land GROSS ROW WETLAND/ MISC. NET TOTAL GROSS NET Use ACRES ACRES PRIMARY ACRES ACRES UNITS DENSITY DENSITY Densitv 36.01 2.44 19.6 0.43 13.54 146 4.05 10.78 medium Pro Con Extends a known plan, high quality May not have same developer Attractive to new developer Must start process over Avoids additional public hearing New development may be different Provides a firm basis for future connections Requires additional/alternate connections? Adjacent properties have not provided connections Premature development without connections Plan well designed with varied housing Can we get better? Market conditions warrant extension Market conditions may remain poor indefinitely City Code applicable to the plan the same City Codes could change Fees are those in place at time of final plat Fees are those in place at final plat r, Liberty at Creek Side • Expanded homesite offering • Varied building layout •Open space in Private Street "D" •Additional site parking •Retaining walls minimized •Trail alignment •Site access (primary & seco Liberty at Creek Side *Premier Collection (98 units) —Traditional townhome design —Three levels of living space —1,550-2,400 finished sque !-car front loaded garag( )275,000-$300,000 price r Liberty at Creek Side oncord Collection (48 units) Urban rowhome design Three levels of living space 1,675-2,365 finished square feet 2 -car rear loaded tuck under garage Raised deck overlooking common areas $230,0004250,000 . - range .t 6wr'G PAR n cr U4 l' CJl n rD rD Cn r-+ CD U) on a J Liberty at Creek Side Proposed Playground Equipment and Site Amenities UNWWPp Liberty at Creek Side - Proposed Playground System 2 - 6' steel benches adjacent to 1— 22 gallon trash receptacle adjacent to playground equipment playground equipment I r f Site Section Likerti, at CreeLsde I CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED � E B 0 3 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT 6roa�ll /50014 Site Secfion �LbiG to at lae I f6op - CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 0 3 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT SCANNED Site Section A Li6crtq at Crec6ide �Iwl ci 930 930 C 920 lRIF 920 910 910 Zi E_sE a 900 900 W W M 890 --' SING ADE 890 BBO BSO -, _ ---' - 3.1 -- 870 --- — --- --- ----- GR 870 E g a €Ys� 860 f9 i 860 SeiE 850 'QBag- 850 i 840 N w 840 3+00 +50 2+00 1+$() 1+00 5450 d SECTION A- A 0 4L """ 09 6 w E-1 P4 zz pa 0 930 930 0 v as rn z 920 - 920 0.00 ZS u 910 OF CHANHASSEN CITY RECEIVED _ I 910 a 900_--- FEB 0 3.2006 -900 - ---_ PAD=90200 890 CHANHASSEN PUNNING DEPT ---------- ----'3:1 3:1 _ 890 3:1 - DRAWN BY SSO _ - --___-_ OPOSED GRADE BSO JPC DATE - h __-_________ 01/25/06 RENSIONS 870 - _____________ ----- -� - �—SING ____ 870 GRADE z 860 w z 6 z 6 0 z 860 0 7 B50 qq 850 S40 8 S & 840 CAD ME 21998 I -%CT S 2+ 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 PROJECT NO. SECTION 13-13X , xs-i | `TOa COUNTRY HOeEs WN pe (� All �jil )` e__%__, -2w } ]k ;_A -B-E G A 1-71[771 F7 :Soy 1A ;ter ' �' � iii' <•t. ij; wt' :. Liberty at CreekSide 7 9 I AM E Liberty at %CreekSide 1 v 'moi ILIA lJlwt 2S � oz, °i04 14 k' I Liberty at CreekSide Liberty at " ekSicfe I i L S �� r C .�rl ��• �• 'is ~ .. Liberty at CreekSide •J,A, .l r aR � •'�'I. .y t4 r y t .,.L• ul. ,,, R. ✓ � r i� �• c. �"�::, �r� �• �.," �• ^"p� �• f „fir •• �.. , �R5 r IF I AD j L r �. Liberty at CreekSide Liberty at Creek Side Proposed Playground Equipment and Site Amenities d�c 417 Mdc;MTH ,_� Liberty at Creek Side - Proposed Playground System 2 - 6' steel benches adjacent to 1— 22 gallon trash receptacle adjacent to playground equipment playground equipment r STREET A PROPOSED TOT LOT AREA I •:+ Gi6erty at CreekSicfe 3 n`z w o a 0 rL rb M � o CL o m � a m- D a p, Y m m oz a m cr° i I I I I I I m w w a m I t K m p, m 7 ° 7 a n w � N FA I I I r I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I �I I t FA e2005 WeelwooE Pmfralmd Sernca, Inc OUMOTE —.— ...... ...... —.— --- I ------- Development Data Fere We Arw Juan ,n mew h. A-2, Ay In I Praawwr cast add. N.1 Rssddenao/ Mseam Den.ity (I-9 a%) \ P-POPI'd Isrh. Rwne W Mediam Dwet, -PVD TI hlb Ile wits _ _ - arse. De.Ia 4.0.5 m./ac rar aer.MRebh Arp 2B.Oo ays: .� •/_y /'/��/ p Mot G.wb• S2I m./an Rwdmp - ! O /LOT O LJ �•J �J .� u J I I I PUb/k 60 R. ROW JI IL 9-11 ffi to sheet 24 ft 9-9 \ \ I I Pr7wt. alb" 20 ft 9-9 hfl, m DmII Y Lsgth 20 ft (to a.b I eek) dYSrY Sorbed. finign.n.) . Pub9e ROW 20 ft /eeb ! 15 M e/M eek Prtwte & " R tI bank o/ aeb ' PnIIIte,05I PnPIIY 2a ft to back oI wrb Abat ' 1 Ir I Proposed 50' Abutting I ft ua a�� h 'Property Setback Line (typ.). 9 9 17 R. I i I PnlPosetl Lot /be 10 ft I. \ Tom mtl Cpm Mpnw SsNaes. ,yK MIS smetma Lwe, SLR. 190 7599wMo9rom amt L _— I Ftlm P okk• MM S Fcbn Praha MM 55J14 \ r 1 I - Fep fq�) qo� I Phonn (952) 9J1-5150 i I %I �T� —�L�'� I ) Fox 9J]-5922 \ 1 1 ` \ ` V / /-/ Cmtact: Kenn park Il - Vmf ( ,h tw e d \\ WALOT C— \ \ \K i Buld ng SetbocklN\ \\ ♦ \ ' / / %w`��` I 1 _ \ 20' BCODimits ♦`�~T�*/, \ \\ `\ \ ` / �/ Primary BCOD ! /� \\ \\\\ /. I / , I Calculated Flood i % \ / / �/ Plain Line (typo) N / // / ^�\ \\ \ \\ \ / Legend F ,� cmpere aro o- caeca. \ / / / / Bluff Creek --- Setback Setback (typo , / / ,/ \ . \ I \ / ) 1 ( \ \ \ Proposed 40'Wetlond--= 1 \`�,_ �♦ -\ ♦`♦ 1 ly // %i Buffer Setback (typo) �� 1 �� // // J / (l ` / 1 \ \ I , a• 61Y120• lea Proposed 16-5'- ♦ `�` Welland Buffer (typ.) ` Liberty at �• os�� ehr 1 to 1 Y.nrrrrrrr rr.y^rrwe e•r�ry .roe aM� aro P � I "11014040e I Creek Side r,eGnlulary I _ a.ur ter. a� u TOWN & CDUNM HO1,�ff5 S�CetCtl p�ell LwRr00d errr.. nr' Ir.r ra.r err /� _.,- �G��._ _ _'�AC.�i—' deebrr- eevsa. U n d N O N �1 0 O N O 3 0 U 0 N 0 0 N i 3 a 0 N 0 0 N 02005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. for Ucti Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Praire, Minnesota 55344 Contact: Kevin Clark Phone: (952) 253-0462 Fax: (952) 944-3437 Prepared by: WWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax:952-937-SS22 Project number: 20021071.00 Contact: Chris Moehrl, P.E. Side VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE O INDEX SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 1 COVER ALL 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 5 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 7 PRELIMINARY TREE INVENTORY PLAN 8 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 9 PRELIMINARY DETAILS 10 PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NO. O REVISION a 1 02/03/06 Revisions Per City Comments ALL i 04/06/06 Plan Change ilY4'My, p� (S. P>� Co. ¢ yP gg P �aurswan2. x rowy� W eweua d e � q LYMAN 4 BLVD eltine L¢k Wye u � 4 .2 e-% t X4 TR. ,�. NO. DATE REVISION SHEETS 1 02/03/06 Revisions Per City Comments ALL 2 04/06/06 Plan Change 1,3-10 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 7 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Construction Plans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota Daft 06/77/05 Sheet 1 of 10 0- 1 C-2 20021071CVP1 4 I • I f f �l -11111111111 IN arm- il low 71 S-A iii ■ INI�I■ f/ it !fir '7 : WA 1, yMA fit, Y-"_ /. E,_. fir- :'�: I� fir►- ...r�� '"..._ / ` �• _ -�, � :t� \a .s - - -=i.. -'. i►�w,N ,� #Igo Fe- -,c c ,;.... :i •mss- /Y.1t."WN. I �f The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23 (referred to herein as Tract A). ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest comer of Section 23 Township 116, Range 23,• thence running North on Section line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest comer of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest comer of said Section and place of beginning. Being a three-comered .piece in Southwest corner of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23. I ALSO: Beginning at the southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116 North of Range 23 West,• thence south along the quarter -quarter section line distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14; thence east along the north line 1 of said Carver County Road No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the l aforementioned quarter -quarter section 627 feet to a point 26 feet north of the east -west quarter -quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26; thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter -quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of beginning (referred to herein as Tract B.) EXCEPT: that part of Tract A which lies Easterly of Line 1 described below: { Line 1. Commencing at the north quarter corner of said Section 26; thence run west an azimuth } of 271 degrees 5 6 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section for 1634.23 feet to 9 9 ' the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 / minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 Jseconds for 478.28 feet; thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a + point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there j terminating; 9 and EXCEPT that part of Tract B which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of Line 2 described below., Line 2: Commencing at the point of termination of Line 1 described above, thence run east on a azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 seconds along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of said section for 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds for 448.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 feet; thence on an azimuth of ( fi 105 degrees 06 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet; thence on an azimuth of 99 degrees 25 N minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating. 0)/ Together with right of access retained in Quit Claim Deed Document No. 310751 pursuant to � — �� ! N ` Access DrivewayPermit dated 8-26-2002. ' ®/ ✓ B / / 9 ©� e 1 Total Site Area36.01 acres LLJ ku /� / ► f{ 4 /cu i E 1 l 1 I heRy maty ehe thr P� ••• P : ms > me Prepal for. . dh•a swill and the I on s duty ]t®..d PEAL Cow. WeS•tVY000� Professional Services, Inc. SURVEYOR mds w laws of the sm all 1" 02/07/06 R"Wons Pr City Canment. l CM 7599 Anagram Drive ref \ \Craig — m\ A— D r v e r a i g. w q n TRY HOME Eden Prairie, MN 55344 � W. 1 TOWN W U 1 P`1 1 Li�".� Phone: 952-937-5150 Far. 952-937-5822 Dale (WO3/(6 it No, 2M FAA Mal 01 100' 200' 300' C-2 20021071EXP01.DWG nac« 6/17/05 sant 2 oa 10 Liberty at Creek Side E)dsdng Conditions/ Survey F-- ( U 0 O O N 0 r7 Co Co 3 0 d o_ 0 CU 0 0 CU m 3 a _o 0i 0 (U 11 c2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I �- Proposed 50 Abutting Property Setback Line (typ.) l \ tit a i 01 R C4 o� i .32 172 \ � aoes \ A� 40e / S N B �� /• /Proposed 16.5' `J Wetland Buffer (t ` 1 V /o•\ \tel / 00 !! \ \ ` 00F Proposed 40'Wetland— Buffer5etback (typ.) t \ h I I / / - — - — � / "e dapIle Calculated Flood Plain Line (typ.) I / 00 // /- I I N00008'59"W 742.33 N00008'59"W 704.89 . Ylfastwood Pro'ft-on rm1 Saha; Inc. I bMby mOEy dWt aa. plan , j I ' y M m mier my i 7M Anagram or[" dine! wpavWwr ad tho I em a duty Nomwd LAND SURVEYOR Qew: Eden Prairie. MN 55344 mda the laws of ab edea d hau mw 02/OD/OB Reviaiw+e Ps City Commentu 3/1/08 LOT REVISIONS (Tj Chodba L•W PHONE 95M37-5150/�� feriae Parer�im� arynPlat, (aT11) FAX 952437-5872otma TOLL FREE 1499437-5150 csflg W. hfoSla YMeslllrow w wrtweaeaoodpa aom Dole 04/06/06 1.hL Na 280'±1 SEEM ota,Fee� ts►feRe Prepared for: TOWN 10' t Data Total Site Area 36.01± ac. Existing Zoning A-2, Agricultural Preservation Existing Guide Plan Residential Medium Density (4-8 u/a) Proposed Zoning Residential Medium Density —PUD Total Premier Townhanes 98 units Total Concord Townhomes 48 units Overall Density 4.05 un./ac. Outlot A 0.43 acres Total Existing Wetlands 0.90 acres Total Wetland MR. Area 2.77 acres Total 3OX Stapes 1.47 acres Net Developable Area 28.00 acres Net Density 5.21 un./ac. Total Impervious Area 9.31 ac. (33.4,' of Net) Street, Roadways and Drives Local Public Street ROW 2.44 ac. Public Street — 60 ft. ROW 31 ft. B—B Private Street 24 ft. B—B Private Drives 20 ft. B—B Building Setbacks (minimums) Public ROW 20 ft. w/walk & 15 ft. w/out walk Private Street 24 ft to back of curb Private Driveway 20 ft. to back of curb Abutting Property 50 ft. Wetland Buffer 40 ft. Building to Building 20 ft. Proposed Lot Line 10 ft.* Minimum Driveway Length Premier 20 ft. (to curb or walk) Concord 20 ft. (to curb or walk) NOT& 1. The lot dimensions and areas on this plan are approximate. Refer to the Final and supporting data for exact lot dimensions and areas. 2. All setbacks measured excluding stoops, patios, porches or decks. J. *Unless platted as townhomes in which case the common lot will be 0 ft. . DA VELOPE11tr Town and Country Homes VBYIDR Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 Phone. (952) 253-0462 Phone: (952) 937-5150 Fox: (952) 944-3437 Fax: (952) 937-5822 Contact: Kevin Clark Contact: Chris Moehrl Premier Lot Tvtical Concord Lot 10' Legend Concrete Curb & Gutter Concrete Sidewalk Liberty at Creek Side 10, 0101 0114 0' 100' 200' 3( C-2 20021071PPF01.DWG Date: 6/17/05 sheet 3 of 10 Preliminary Plat L . Der -Ey aT [pre cl ;wk Si d p Grath 0 0 N r v 0) 3 a O J a 0 CD 0 (U m 3 0 (U 0 0 (L i7 0 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. out misdirected branches leaden Intact 4' depth of specified mulch over As - do not pile against trunk plant pit with specified backflll soil sides and bottom of hale :o American Standard for Nursery Steak durum ball size. 1' deep watering basin ut ball on undbturbed subsoil or compacted soil mound matching tree natural groundline with finished site grads out misdirected branches seders Intact and staking Is optional: 0 etdl= 5' above 70,1111 (max) or to fleet branch. m of stake 3' (mhow ground 19 polls to be 2'X2 stained wood or pointed ddheator posts. 3 pests aquk6etmt around and outside root boo. e tree to pests with 16' long pdypmp*m or th71me, 40 mg. 1 1/2' wide strap. wrapping is caged fon wrap from ine upward to final branches r depth of Specified mulch ow die - do not pfle against trunk Plant pit with specified ba"I cog sides and bottom of hole o Amery Standard for Nursery Stock hnum bag aim " deep watering basin ,t ball on undisturbed subsoil or comparted wall mound matching trees natural groundlme with finished site grade . F bawby ONMY ON tides PUB we I I by new a sate my Westwood Professional Services, Inc. �' a th,w,'oda* , 'ADM '"u°°` >� PM 07/22/05 - Ravin Plant Lfa! end Buffer Requirements- JW07/26/05 - Revised title block and Info Shown an plan - JwH t 19H 7599 Anagram Drive 02/03/05 - Revlskre, Per City Comments - CFF tiR$ 04/06/06 - Plan Chernow - CEF Eden Prairie, MN 55344 liidA J HankCtAwac Phone: 952-937.5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Daps w fm Lis Na )l ]lamed arwm6 1g►/doe Prepared fa: Planting Notes Contractor shall provide one year guarantee of all plant materials. The guarantee begins on the date of the Landscape Architect's or Owner's written acceptance of the initial planting. Replacement plant materials shall also have a one year guarantee commencing upon planting. All plants to be specimen grade, Minnesota -grown and/or hardy. Specimen grade shall adhere to, but is not limited by, the following standards: All plants shall be free from disease, pests, wounds, scars, etc. All plants shall be free from noticeable gaps, holes, or deformities. All plants shall be free from broken or dead branches. All plants shall have heavy, healthy branching and leafing. Coniferous trees shall have an established main leader and a height to width ratio of no less than 5:3. Plants to meet American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI 60.1-1990) requirements for size and type specified. Plants to be installed as per standard ANSI planting practices. Use minimum 12" loam planting soil on trees and 6" on shrubs (sides and bottom of hole). Backfill soil to be existing top soil from site free of roots, rocks larger than one inch, subsoil debris, and large weeds. Contractor shall verify locations with all utilities prior to installation of plants. Staking of trees optional; reposition, plumb and stake if not plumb after one year. Wrap all smooth -barked trees - fasten top and bottom. Remove by April 1. Open top of burlap on BE materials; remove pot on potted plants; split and break apart peat pots. Prune plants as necessary - per standard nursery practice and to correct poor branching. Plants shall be immediately planted upon arrival at site. Properly heel -in materials if necessary, temporary only. All disturbed areas to be sodded unless otherwise noted: sod to be standard Minnesota grown and hardy bluegrass mix. All sod areas shall be prepared with 4" of topsoil and raked to remove debris and ensure drainage. Slopes of 3:1 or greater shall be staked. Four inches of shredded hardwood bark mulch shall be used around all trees within turf areas. All shrub planting beds (within sodded areas) shall have weed barrier fabric, 4" of shredded bark mulch and Valley -View Black Diamond (or equal) poly edging. The edging shall be placed with smooth curves and at least 3' from the centers of evergreen trees. Utilize curbs and sidewalks for edging where possible. Contractor shall contact Gopher State "One Call" (651-454-0002 or 800-252-1166) to verify locations of all underground utilities. Actual location of plant material is subject to field and site conditions. No planting will be installed until all grading and construction has been completed in the immediate area. Contractor shall provide necessary watering of plant materials until the plant is fully established or irrigation system is operational. Owner will not provide water for Contractor. Provide irrigation to all planted areas on site. Irrigation will be design/build by Landscape Contractor. All information about installation and scheduling can be obtained from General Contractor. Repair, replace, or provide sod/seed as required for any roadway boulevard areas adjacent to the site disturbed during construction. Repair all damage to property from planting operations at no cost to owner. No plant material substitutions will be accepted unless approval is requested of the Landscape Architect by the Landscape Contractor prior to submission of the bid and/or quotation. Shrub Detail ffir TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES /��i"" l � nn k Hmaama,ncaNa3". Remove container, set wall mass on compacted soli mound matching shrubs natural gmutdone with finished site grade All planting beds shall racehe 4' of specified mulch and weed barrier fabric Edge all planting beds with specified edger where adjacent to low areas sides and bottom of hole plant pit with specified backfill won Plant List Prairie Fire Crabapple / Molus x 'Prairie Fire' 1.5" BE CODE QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE BE OVERSTORY 179 Patmore Ash / Froxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' 1.5"-3.5" BB 7.07 x 6.0 = Green Mountain Sugar Maple / Acer saccarum 'Green Mountain' 1.5"-3.5" BE ® Red Oak / Quercus alba 1.5"-3.5" BB EVERGREEN 81 Skyline Honeylocust / Gleditsia triacanthos ver. inermis 'Skycole' 1.5"-3.5" BE ® Redmond Linden / Tilio americana 'Redmond' 1.5"-3.5" BE Northwood Red Maple / Acer rubrum 'Northland' 1.5"-3.5" BB Sur Oak /Quercus macrocarpa 1.5"-3.5" BE ORNAMENTAL 54 Prairie Fire Crabapple / Molus x 'Prairie Fire' 1.5" BE 7.07 Spring Snow Crabapple / Malus x 'Spring Snow' 1.5" BE Overstory Trees Cockspur Hawthorn / Cratoegus crus-galli 1.5" BB 7.07 x 6.0 = Japanese Tree Lilac / Syringa reticulata 1.5" BB ® Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry / Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 1.5" BB EVERGREEN 81 Black Hills Spruce/Picea glauca densata 6'-B' BE 17 Ornamental Trees Austrian Pine/Pinus nigra Colorado Green Spruce / Picea pungens 6'-8' 6'-8' BE BE Scotch Pine / Pinus sylvestris 6'-8' BE Techny Arborvitae / Thuja occidentalis 'Techny' 6'-B' BE SHRUBS 74 Isanti Dogwood / Cornus stolonifera 'Isanti' 36" Pot Red Twigged Dogwood / Comus sericea boileyl 36" Pot Nannyberry Viburnum / Viburnum lentago 36" Pot Compact American Cranberrybush Viburnum / Viburnum trilobum 'Compacta 24" Pot Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle/ Diervilla lonicera 24" Pot Dwarf Winged Euonymu8 / Euonymus alatus 'Compactus' 24" Pot 24" Pot NOTES: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. PLANT SYMBOLS ARE DRAWN AT 75% MATURITY 15'/30' BUFFER REQUIREMENT TREE QUANTITIES ARE REFLECTED IN THE PLANT LIST AND ARE NOT SEPARATE QUANTITIES. 15' Buffer Requirements Medium Density Adjacent to Road Buffer Yard Requirement "B" (City Ordinance) 2.0 Canopy Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 4.0 Understory / Ornamental Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 6.0 Shrubs per 100' LF of Buffer Trees Required 707.31 LF / 100 LF = 7.07 7.07 x 2.0 = 14.14 Overstory Trees 7.07 x 4.0 = 28.28 Understory / Ornamental Trees 7.07 x 6.0 = 42.42 Shrubs Trees Provided 9 Overstory Trees 5 8' Evergreen Trees 17 Ornamental Trees 11 6' Evergreen Trees 42 Shrubs NOTES: 31% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 15' BUFFER ARE 8' TALL 69% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 15' BUFFER ARE 6' TALL W Buffer Requirements Medium Density Adjacent to Road Buffer Yard Requirement "B" (City Ordinance) 0.8 Canopy Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 1.6 Understory / Ornamental Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 2.4 Shrubs per 100' LF of Buffer Trees Required 494.66 LF / 100 LF = 4.95 4.95 x 0.8 = 3.96 Overstory Trees 4,95 x 1.6 = 7.92 Understory / Ornamental Trees 4.95 x 2.4 = 11.88 Shrubs Trees Provided 4 Overstory Trees 9 8' Evergreen Trees 12 Understory Trees 9 6' Evergreen Trees 32 Shrubs NOTES: 50% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 30' BUFFER ARE 8' TALL 50% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 30' BUFFER ARE 6' TALL Liberty at 0' 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-2 20021071PLP01.DWG Daae 06/17/05 sneer 6 oa 10 Creek Side Pre ' w ��ww Landscape Plan CD 0 N v of 3 0 2 a t - CD 0 cu 0 0 (U rn 3 n 0 N 0 0 z c2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. . Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax:952-937.5822 I hmby Mny drt ddv pLn won j by me ae mder my dtmd ea11on and that Ian a ddy 11mm IAND9CAPa ABCiMWT radar do hm d of d. 8fd• of la®es Hdw J. Hawk Dale 0406106 Lie® No. YM4 Ri -4 07/22/05 - Revt3ed Calve - JW 07 - Rerkea Cake for Tree Pres. Data - JIM 07/26/05 - Revised Title Block - JIM 02/03/06 - Revisions Per Ch y comments - CFF 04/06/05 - Plan chmgm - CEF some 2wft tyleft Tree List I ID# 7001 7002 Species American Elm American Elm Saved/Removed Removed Removed Cal. in. 12 12 Notes 7007 American Elm Saved 20 7010 Boxelder Saved 13 7011 White Oak Saved 15 X 7012 Aspen Saved 22 X 7013 American Elm Saved 15 7014 American Elm Saved 13 7015 American Elm Saved 12 X 7016 Boxelder Saved 15 7017 Boxelder Saved 15 7018 Hackberry Saved 14 7019 Boxelder Saved 19 7020 Bur Oak Saved 26 7021 American Elm Saved 16 X 7022 Bur Oak Saved 35 X 7023 Bur Oak Saved 32 7026 American Elm Saved 12 7027 Boxelder Saved 14 7028 American Elm Saved 12 X 7029 Bur Oak _ I Saved 25 X 7032 Boxelder Saved 12 7033 American Elm Saved 12 _ 7034 Boxelder Saved 13 7035 American Elm Saved 12 7036 Boxelder Saved 14 7037 Boxelder Saved 13 X 7040 Bur Oak Saved 29 7041 l Bur Oak Saved 17 7042 Bur Oak Saved 26 7043 Bur Oak _ Saved 28 X 7044 Bur Oak Saved 34 X 7055 Boxelder Saved 13 X 7056 Boxelder Saved 14 X 7057 Boxelder Saved 22 X 7058 Boxelder Saved 18 X 7059 Boxelder Saved 12 7060 Boxelder Saved 13 7061 Boxelder Saved 13 X 7062 Bur Oak Saved 43 X 7063 American Elm Saved 12 X 7064 American Elm Saved 13 7065 American Elm Saved 12 7066 Boxelder Saved 16 X 7067 Boxelder Saved 12 X 7068 Boxelder Saved 26 X 7069 American Elm Saved 22 X 7070 Boxelder Saved 15 X 7071 _Boxelder Green/White Ash Saved 12 7124 jr Oak Saved 20 Trees Off -Site Bur Oak Saved 21 Total Cal. In. Removed 510 Total Cal. In. Saved ID # Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes 3294 Sugar Maple Saved 6 7003 Black Willow Saved 12 7004 Cottonwood Saved 15 7005 Bur Oak Saved 46 7006 Bur Oak Saved 31 7024 Bur Oak Saved 32 7030 Bur Oak Saved 27 7031 Bur Oak Saved 26 7045 Boxelder Saved 27 X 7046 American Elm Saved 12 7047 American Elm Saved 21 7048 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 20 7049 Boxelder Saved 24 X 7050 Boxelder Saved 26 X 7051 Boxelder Saved 22 X 7052 Boxelder Saved 16 7084 American Elm Saved 12 7085 Black Willow Saved 45 X 7(186 American Elm Saved 21 X 7094 Green/White Ash Saved 16 7176 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 15 7177 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 17 7178 Boxelder Saved 19 X 7179 Boxelder Saved 16 X 7180 Boxelder Saved 18 X 7181 Boxelder Saved 16 7182 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7183 Boxelder Saved 12 Total Trees (Cal. In.) = 590 Total Cal, In. Removed 0 Total Cal. In. Saved 590 ID# Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes 7072 Boxelder Swed 15 7073 Boxelder I Saved 12 7074 Boxelder Saved 29 X 7075 Bur Oak Saved 48 7076 Boxelder Saved 12 7077 Boxelder Saved 12 7078 Boxelder Saved 36 X 7079 Boxelder Saved 27 7080 Boxelder Saved 12 7081 Boxelder Saved 12 7082 Boxelder Saved 14 7083 Boxelder Saved 12 7087 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7088 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7089 Bur Oak Saved 25 7090 Boxelder Saved 13 7091 Boxelder Saved 16 7092 Boxelder Saved 18 X 7093 Black Willow Saved 31 X 7095 Bur Oak Saved 40 7096 Bur Oak Saved 39 _ 7097 Bur Oak Saved 23 7098 Bur Oak Saved 34 7099 Boxelder �- Saved 14 7100 Boxelder Saved 27 X 7101 White Ash Saved 12 7102elder American Elm Saved 13 7103eler 7Boxelcder Saved 12 7104 Siberian Elm Removed 25 X 7105elder Siberian Elm Removed 26 X 7106 Boxelder Removed -33 X 7107 E Boxelder �'-Vry Removed 37 X 7108 Boxelder Removed 22 7109 Bur Oak 18 X 7110 Boxelder _Removed Removed 18 7111 Boxelder Removed 13 7112 American Elm Removed 12 X 7113 American Elm Removed 16 X 7114 American Elm Removed 19 X 7115 Boxelder Removed 21 7116 American Elm Removed 14 7117 American Elm Removed 15 7118 Green/White Ash Removed 13 X 7119 American Elm Removed 15 D 7120 Boxelder Removed 15 7121 Boxelder Removed 18 X 7123 Boxelder Saved 13 7124 jr Oak Saved 20 7125 Bur Oak Saved 21 Total Cal. In. Removed Legend ( Tree to Remain ® Tree to be Removed ®Tree to be Removed due to Park Hoard Trail X Multi -Trunked Tree Preservation Data - Medium Density Residential Gross Site Area Net Site Area (less wetland & steep slopes) Gross Canopy Cover Net Canopy (less wetlands & steep slopes) Baseline Canopy Cover (5.4 Ac / 30.87 Ac = 17.5%) Required Canopy (20%) (30.87 X .20 = 6.2 Ac.) Canopy Needed (6.2 Ac - 5.4 Ac = 0.8 Ac.) Canopy Removed (1.01 Ac. to grading limit line) Replacement Required (0.8 Ac. X 1.2 Ac. = 0.96 Ac. Canopy Needed Above (1.01 Ac X 1.2 Ac = 1.21 Ac. Canopy Removed) Existing Canopy) Total Replacement Required (0.96 Ac. + 1.21 Ac. = 2.17 Ac.) Required Trees (2.17 Ac. x 43,560 SF = 94,525 SF / 1089) Landscape Trees Provided ffi TOA N &T COUNTRY HONES 36.01 +/- Ac. 30.87 Ac. 7.4 Ac. 5.4 Ac. 17.5% 6.2 Ac. 0.8 Ac. 1.01 Ac. 0.96 Ac. 1.21 Ac. 2.17 Ac. 87 Trees 260 Trees Tree Protection Detail PLM Orange Mesh Construction Fence Location as shown on plan Stake every 6' maximum. OX. " Post or Equal ge Construction e Staked Every 6' Liberty at Creek Side Nobs 1. Pruning will be done by professionals during appropriate pruning season. 2. No storage of materials, operation of machinery, or development of any sort will occur within the fence -line without approval in writing from the City. 3. Site grading to be done only after protective measures have been taken, city has approved fencing locations, and all contractors have been briefed on tree preservation techniques. 3. Tree removals off site are not included in the tree preservation data. Trees removed for trail requested by Park Board is not included in tree preservation data. 0 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-2 20021071TPP01.DWG Date 06/17/05 sheft 7 of 10 Tree Inventory Plan Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes tD# Boxelder Saved 16 Boxelder Saved 12 7128 Boxelder Saved 13 7129 Boxelder Saved 12 7130 Boxelder Saved 17 7131 Boxelder Saved 14 7132 Boxelder Saved 19 7133 Boxelder Saved 16 7134 Boxelder Saved 15 7135 Boxelder Removed 14 7136 Boxelder Removed 36 7137 Boxelder Removed 12 7138 Boxelder Removed 15 7139 Boxelder Removed 12 7140 American Elm Saved 14 7141 American Elm Removed 21 7142 Bur Oak Saved 31 7143 Bur Oak Saved 30 7144 Cottonwood Saved 30 7147 Black Willow Saved 14 7148 Boxelder Saved 20 _ 7149 American Elm Saved 22 7150 American Elm Saved 12 7151 American Elm Saved 13 7152 Boxelder Saved 12 7153 Boxelder Saved 19 7154 American Elm Saved 12 7155 American Elm Saved 13 7156 Siberian Elm Saved 29 X 7157 Siberian Elm Saved 16 7158 American Elm Removed 26 X 7159 Boxelder Saved 19 7160 Boxelder Saved 19 7161 Boxelder Saved 30 X 7162 Boxelder Saved 12 7163 Bur Oak Saved 27 7164 Boxelder Saved 13 7165 Boxelder Saved 21 X 7166 American Elm Saved 14 7167 American Elm Saved 18 7168 Boxelder Saved 16 7169 Bur Oak Saved 32 7170 Basswood Saved 16 X 7171 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 15 7172 Cottonwood Saved 15 7174 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 20 7175 Sugar Maple Saved 36 Total Trees (Cal. In.) = 2749 Total Cal. In. Removed 510 Total Cal. In. Saved 2829 Tree Protection Detail PLM Orange Mesh Construction Fence Location as shown on plan Stake every 6' maximum. OX. " Post or Equal ge Construction e Staked Every 6' Liberty at Creek Side Nobs 1. Pruning will be done by professionals during appropriate pruning season. 2. No storage of materials, operation of machinery, or development of any sort will occur within the fence -line without approval in writing from the City. 3. Site grading to be done only after protective measures have been taken, city has approved fencing locations, and all contractors have been briefed on tree preservation techniques. 3. Tree removals off site are not included in the tree preservation data. Trees removed for trail requested by Park Board is not included in tree preservation data. 0 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-2 20021071TPP01.DWG Date 06/17/05 sheft 7 of 10 Tree Inventory Plan !v q -f f - U U 0 V Cl CIO ID O CD (1! f` V m a 0 as r o_ R1 0 0 (U m 73 3 0 ru CD 0 N / o2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Note: Silt fence per MNDOT specifications, source 2000, machine sliced woven monofilament, 36"wide fastened steel T -Posts with 3(5016) tens strength plastic zip ties per T -Post. (Machine sliced) 6inaL ,T!a�g EROSION CONTROL FENCE - TYPE 1 T Posts 24' in ground Res Min Depth of sit fence eneeonent Note: Type 2 silt fence is the same as type I with hay bales installed as per detail. Type 2 to be used to protect all wetlands. Zip Ties 11y or Strn" 36, !n w0 ,bM sen EeuM ae IS b iR,ro M NeL armor"�Cwe. vm. &b ve b M btl 11, a empgbLe YISK CITY OF SILT C8LN8ASO FENCE REVISED: 2-97, 1-02,1-03,1-01 PATE: 2-97 P TE NO.: C FILE W.ME:393-53DO y JJl/V PL 10'� �v DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT /gL�O RO�.PO�C FILTER FABRIC O� 6" MINIMUM DEPTH >s C dr/��C 1" - 2" WASHED ROCK M 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM Zc; MyN�MJ TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE NOTE: FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. CITY OF K C$AjSASSjj CONSUCTION ENTRANCE D:1-99 DATE:—�� PIATE NO.: 5301 ANE 393-5301 _ N OTE Silt fence per MNDOT specifications, source 200, machine sliced woven monofilament, 36" wide fastened to steel T -Posts with 3(501b) tensile strength plastic zip ties per T-Post.(machine sliced) RUNOFF filter T 40TH FILTERED WATER SECTION AA CIT4Y�OeeF OFF ROAD CB CIUiii 1311 FILTER BARRIER REv1Sm:1-04 GATE: 2-01 PLATE No.: 5302 FILE NAME:393_5302 A A 0111, FOR ISI � '�..V �A � � � � � A � � � � • A � � � 4 � - � . �� 4 u 2. I �v v' 'v v_ v' v I hereby certify that tib p1m w. paepued by me m lmda my . Westwood Professional Services, Inc e > h. ft O`"` 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Chds iMOehrL p$ Phone: 952.937-5150 Fax: 952.937-5822 Dun 04/06/06 Lima No. 4M SLOPE 1-1/2" - MnDOT 2350 LVWE350308 WEAR COURSE MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" - Ni 2350 LVNW35030B BASE COURSE 12" - CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 1007. CRUSHED STONE 24" MnDOT 3149.28 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW COMPACTED SUBGRADE > 02/03/08 Revisions Per City Comments 04/06/06 Plop Change (11RN) 2.0% Aul '[:✓M1 4N 6"-3A32 CONCRETE 4" CLASS 5 COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE WALKWAY SEE PLAN VIEW FOR SPECIFIC SIDE FOR SIDEWALK Prepared for. TOWN R--T MATS/80 SHOULD E INSTALLED VERTICALL DOWNSLOF Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 DIRT MATH <ET WW W W > > > 71 OI O OI OI N iiATER DIRECTION_ OF FLOW ON LOT STREET PROFILE — — — — — — — — — — — 0.5' DIRECTION OF FLOW ONSTREET EXTILI ISOMETRIC VIEW FILTER FABRIC UNDER NOTE: TYPICAL TREATMENT 1. SLOPE SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, WET SLOPE LINING CLODS, STICKS AND GRASS. MATS/BLANKETS SHALL HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT OH BLAH M ARMACE 2. LAY BLANKETS LOOSELY AND STAKE OR FRF RAENSTAPLE TO MAINTAIN DIRECT CONTACT WITHMATS SLOPE THE SOIL DO NOT STRETCHNSTALl�T10N TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE/STREET C, Do E SECTION (24' BACK TO BACT SLOPE VARIES ROLLS OF SOD BACK OF CURB (TYP) SLOP 1-1/2" MnDOT SPEC. 2350 LVWE35030B WEAR COURSE MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" MnDOT SPEC. 2350 LVNW35030B BASE COURSE 6" MnDOT SPEC. 2211 CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE BASE 24" MnDOT SPEC. 3149.28 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side CIIaI1�1888811z MlliIle801V8 0.5' LOT BENCHING C-2 20021071DTP01.DWG Daces 061VIOS slim 9 OF 10 Preliminary Grading Details o 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. iii ELEV PVI STA = 32+00 PVI ELEV = 898.95 A.D. = -1.25 K = 40.16 I IPVI STA = 34+00 50' VC PVI ELEV = 886.96 A.D. = 5.40 K = 37.05 + o Ln I 200' VC - M U d o In O) N it 04 j M J II W F- a_ n 0o o II 0 CIJrn W M 000 J th W II II >J o W 90 ELEV = 882.16 L.P. STA = 42+21.78 PVI STA = 42+30 PVI ELEV = 882.00 C) A.D. r70 00 cow 61.54 Of*- 90' 1nM 0) rnCO 0 r`C) n M rn0) 0300 M 0a) N O 00) 00 O 00) CO00 0A Co 0) 0 0000 u W 0 0000 II w 0 coCo LU 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 0 Uj N In d: 00 + I to + 00 M 00 LINE ® 37+62.42 L.P. ELEV = 882.16 L.P. STA = 42+21.78 PVI STA = 42+30 PVI ELEV = 882.00 C) A.D. = 1.46 00 K = 61.54 �n 90' VC 0) on 0 It)N n M LO 0300 M oao N CN 00 ,moo CO00 00 n > u W u 5 II w a LU a w SHED GRADE (TYP.) G GRADE (TYP.) N� M to0 O �n'o M �Co O N� n K = 20.00 C) .- �I` 00 Ln l` to �n N rnn 0) on 0 `- n M `. ao O oao N �W d ,moo N �N N 20+00 N n �o Od CO 4 �a rnn N �o + N �� O 0) � n � o `- M � m � rn O M 0�1 OD 00 0 ^ 000 1D 00 l0 r to W r QJ n \ _ � > o_ i.- 5 a N7 M n 1'7 r M . r N N N '- N D0 N N IMo, O MJ 0) t"l to r7 n r'7 N �") tD r'i O c0 to Occ 0 t+7 M c0 n O N O0 00 00 OD 00 0 00 00 0 Cb 0p 00 00 OJ 00 00 co Du 00 00 00 0 OJ Go co 0 O0 M 00 00 00 � Co Co 00 00 00 p0 00 CO 00 CO co00 00 to 00 00 CO 00 00 00 O 00 00 00 00 00 00 O0 03 O 00 00 O 00 O OD 00 00 00 00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 PM STA = 6+90 PVI ELEV = 909.63 A.D. _ -1.00 K = 90.33 1 __, - I 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 PRIVATE STREET C W WesMood Profeslonel Services, Inc 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952.937-5150 FAX 952-937-5872 TOLL FREE 14888-937-5150 Viftstwood www.wenwoodps.com STREET A H.P. ELEV = 888.63 H.P. STA = 50+17.15 PVI STA = 50+20 PVI ELEV = 888.73 A.D. _ -2.00 K = 20.00 yi PVI w rte- 40' VC O Ifs L0 O ELEV O 0 1C) 00 II II II II > PVI w CL t Ld DATUM ELEV 875.00 I hereby oertlfy that " p1m , prepared by me m me4 my Revldoas direct eupirvidon and that I am a duty Itomeed PROPS MONAL HNCODffi�t mder�e 4� M;nr.s1.`. 02/03/06 Revlaione Per City 0ommenta 04/06/06 Plan Change ,ty Chris Moehrl, P.S Deme 04/06/06 LicMe No. 4085,3 LO PO C4 0 00 MOd 't� Ori r,6 06 00 04 NM OM 0 OD 00 0000 000 00W 00co � 0000 00 000 0 000 0 000000 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 PRIVATE STREET D Dedpai M Prepared for. Che*ad; am Drew¢ MM Retmd D !Mft by/due: r7 00 00 00 I W DATUM ELEV 875.00 4TUM ELEV 860.00 rim MIMITA a AJIM Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 PVI STA = 22+86.24 PVI ELEV = 891.69 ELEV A.D. _ -2.01 K = 19.91 tnN PVI STA = 23+26.24 PVI ELEV = 889.69 .-0 A.D. = 2.00 010) K 1= 20.00 00 00) 0� 0) 140' VC 00 0 00 00 00 co 40' VC O 00 0 00 00 00 00 20+00 N d Od CO 4 C' 21+00 N O) + N 23+00 O 0) N CO r, N II 0o + N 00 II II II > M NII II II W r QJ di \ _ � > o_ i.- 5 a 880.00 STA = 11+91.67 PVI ELEV = 897.50 W A.D. _ -4.00 tnN K = 30.00 M 120' VC Un^ �0 .-0 00 00 010) 00) 00 00 00) 0� 0) 0 00 0 00 00 00 co 00 00 O 00 0 00 00 00 00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 PVI STA = 11+91.67 PVI ELEV = 897.50 W A.D. _ -4.00 PVI K = 30.00 M 120' VC 7.60 K = 38.16 � O o M VC M + 0 00 II j 0 M II U a j W 'n rn W N 00 II j M W � J �} W f0 18+17.86 PVI ELEV M STREET B PVI STA = 14+84.53 PVI ELEV = 877.00 A. D. = 6.40 K = 37.50 240' VC L.P. ELEV = 875.80 L.P. STA = 16+95.75 PVI STA = 18+17.86 PVI ELEV = 875.00 A.D. = 7.60 K = 38.16 li 290' VC 60+00 61+00 62+00 11+00 12+00 PRIVATE STREET E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TOWN& 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 STREET F Liberty at Creek Side Climuhumn, Minnesota 17+00 18+00 00 Nto to 00 + ao 0) II H W >W EL C-2 20021071DTP02.DWG Date 06/17/05 sheet 10 oP 10 Preliminary Street Profiles 12005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. for ucti Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: M 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Praire, Minnesota Contact: Kevin Clark Phone: (952) 253-0462 Fax: (952) 944-3437 55344 Prepared by: WWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax., 952-937-5822 Project number: 20021071.00 Contact: Chris Moehrl, P.E. Is7 Side VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE DATE INDEX SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 1 COVER ALL 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 5 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 7 PRELIMINARY TREE INVENTORY PLAN 8 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 9 PRELIMINARY DETAILS 10 PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NO. DATE tt M F of SHEETS 1 02/03/06 Revisions Per City Comments ALL n LY86� + �� pp P� O q� pry P Cf. �O lYYLV 1OH11PIN 9LVD. T', BLYO. �T{ .Y �, ♦S �� R i w p 9 t� e L YMAN BLVD eLtine L¢k Q '� o� AI0 TRry S LL NO. DATE REVISION SHEETS 1 02/03/06 Revisions Per City Comments ALL CITv OF SSEN RECEIVED FEB 0 3 2006 CpA*MEN PLANNING DEPT Construction Plans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota Data: 06/17/05 Sheet: 1 of 10 ®2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.- I / `t / n LEGEND ®� 100, I CONIFEROUS TREE (surveyed) ELECTRIC METER .."'• line of 1 f the NW /4 e SE ZOO p DECIDUOUS TREE (surveyed) ELECTRIC MANHOLE WETLAND SANITARY MANHOLE c�� I ® STEEL/WOOD POST ® CATCH BASIN \ west line of the . -� SIGN-TRAFFIC/OTHER ® FLARED END SEC7701V N0000859"W 742.38 1/4 of the NW 1, O ' ww MAIL BOX f 8 O PERC 7EST STORM MANHOLE Poi10� — — — qq _ — — — — � — 'C — — ❑r TELEPHONE BOX t I j o N00p08'59"W 704.91 Mw MONITORING WELL 4 / t� oa GATE VALVE © CABLE TV BOX � HYDRANT s ` CT B GAS METER WELL 11010 � 1f g I �, � � R STREET U7E —Pa* POWER OVERHEAD GUY WIRE —X— FENCE LINE r"" POWER POLE . DECIDUOUS TREE LINE ® J \ / \ \ ❑Q ELECTRIC BOX ./ i ®� / � �•'� � �^•.,. � � � ® O Denotes Set Iron Monument r \ • Denotes Found Iron Monument O\ O Denotes Cost Iron Monument 90 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE �4, l / r; o r Legal Description � � � � � f '°�•+ o\ \ \ � ! rI� The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23 (referred 40' Bluff Creek Overlay District l� ! J to herein as Tract A). I 4 Building Setback -J \ - `., ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest comer of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23• thence running North on Section line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Section; thence West 30 feet ine to said Southwest comer of said Section and place of beginning. Being a three -cornered piece in e n ' ; I \ «� J [[[ r Southwest corner of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23. ALSO: Beginning at the southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of l \ / Prlmar Bluff , Section 26, Township 116 North of Range 23 West; thence south along the Dist section line distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14, thence east along the north line of said Carver County Road No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the r i aforementioned quarter -quarter section 827 feet to a point 26 feet north of the east -west quarter -quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26; thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter -quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of ,�yl O ' k \+. �• 6{ beginning (referred to herein as Tract B.) EXCEPT that part of Tract A which lies Easterly, of Line 1 described below. Line 1. Commencing at the north quarter comer of said Section 26; thence run west on azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of sold section for 1634.23 feet to m 1 \ y the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described, thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 •.,.0 •� 1 ` seconds for 478.28 feet; thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for f l 4 ` 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a o % �� f 1 ' d t 1 point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there N p , / t I'� ' 1" / _ ... ._,� J f 11 t terminating; CU 11) 9 / I �. I '� .° �"� 1 { and EXCEPT that part of Tract B which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of Line 2 o ¢ O I._ �� i' �— ��..•� ' / / i "k - "- I described below. - Line 2: Commencing at the point of termination of Line i described above; thence run east an a o O ' " azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 seconds alongthe south line of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of said section for 556.16 feet to the 26 3 / described,thencegon an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutesn59 set of c onds oro f Line 2 to be ti 448.73 feet, thence on an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 feet; thence on an azimuth of Cd S / lI degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 3feet; thence on on azimuth of 99 degrees 25 N � min there ( i minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating. rn/ f f 1 / O t ® , Together with right of access retained in Quit Claim Deed Document No. 310751 pursuant to 3 ,O / Yom' / — �� / l Access Driveway Permit doted 8-26-2002. r j Z / i 1 �� l Toto! Site Area: 36.01 acres (tJ 3 0' 100, 200' 300' Cd C-2 20021071EXPOI.DWG CLI F -I ' Liberty at �° 6/17/05 sheep 2 of 10 I haat' mt fy that rbw plan area paapared by me m �a m2 Realdoom for Y . aaparvlelon and � I am a salt' Of bam Bots. eloNel COW. `'d Existing Conditions/ Westwood Professional Services, Inc. t�,a.. »� 02/03/08 Ravaiona Per GtY comments 7599 Anagram Drive 4) Creek Side Ddtnm SRO l O & X_,l1 V LVTW HOME X v Serve Eden Prairie, MN 55344 CL'a� W. -norse� ``-�/,K�,�s,,„.o�e�� y Phone: 952-937-5750 Fax: 952-937-5822 Dda 02/03/06 Liam No, 2=1>�a �s i y1daft / Q181111888Ct1. MlIliLE80t8 F U U 5- d lztN r 0 V 0 0 N N N 4. 3 0 L� d CL ti n 0 N 0 0 N Cl) 3 a i 0 N 0 0 N 17 V) V) U f OL (h ON 0 V 0 0 N N N i7 I FA el: I - in U E n m v v re, o2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 wt miWrected branches seders Intact 4- depth of specified mulch over pits - do not pile against trunk plant pit with specified backfill cog aides and bottom of hole :o American Standard for Nursery Stock dmum boll size. 5" deep watering basin A ball an undisturbed subsoil or compacted eoll mound matching trees natural groundline with finished site grade I herby aeetlfy that tht. plan ver paeI ' by mea pada my dhwet mpeevis ak and cut I as a piety ]tmad IADIDSCAAn ARCFanu coda the hose of the Blase of lain wla. Mw J. He" Dees 02/03/06 License Na 16454 Revisions 07/22/05 - Revised Plant List and Buffer Requirements - JWH 07/26/05 - ReNeed title block and Info shown on plan - JWH 02/03/05 - Revisions Per City Comments - CEF wt misdirected branches eaders intact and staking Is optional d stakes 5' above ground (mac) or to first branch. m of stake V (mln.) below ground ig posts to be 2"x2" stained woad or pointed delineator posts. 3 posts equidistant onound and outside root ball. e tree to posts with i6" long pelyprapylene ar Nytena 40 mil, 1 1/2" wkb •bap. wrapping Is called for: wrap from line upward to first branches V depth of specified mulch owr pita - do not pne against trunk plant pit with specified backfill soil sides and bottom of hole :o American Standard for Nursery Stock durum ball size. I" deep watering basin A ball on undisturbed subsoll or compoeted sell mound matching trees natural groundline with finished site grade Pa7ared for: Planting Notes Contractor shall provide one year guarantee of all plant materials. The guarantee begins on the date of the Landscape Architect's or Owner's written acceptance of the initial planting. Replacement plant materials shall also have a one year guarantee commencing upon planting. All plants to be specimen grade, Minnesota -grown and/or hardy. Specimen grade shall adhere to, but is not limited by, the following standards: All plants shall be free from disease, pests, wounds, scars, etc. All plants shall be free from noticeable gaps, holes, or deformities. All plants shall be free from broken or dead branches. All plants shall have heavy, healthy branching and leafing. Coniferous trees shall have an established main leader and a height to width ratio of no less than 5:3. Plants to meet American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI 60.1-1990) requirements for size and type specified. Plants to be Installed as per standard ANSI planting practices. Use minimum 12" loam planting soil on trees and 6" on shrubs (sides and bottom of hole). Backfill soil to be existing top soil from site free of roots, rocks larger than one inch, subsoil debris, and large weeds. Contractor shall verify locations with all utilities prior to installation of plants. Staking of trees optional; reposition, plumb and stake if not plumb after one year. wrap all smooth -barked trees - fasten top and bottom. Remove by April 1. Open top of burlap on BB materials; remove pot on potted plants; split and break apart peat pots. Prune plants as necessary - per standard nursery practice and to correct poor branching. Plants shall be immediately planted upon arrival at site. Properly heel -in materials if necessary, temporary only. All disturbed areas to be sodded unless otherwise noted: sod to be standard Minnesota grown and hardy bluegrass mix. All sod areas shall be prepared with 4" of topsoil and raked to remove debris and ensure drainage. Slopes of 3:1 or greater shall be staked. Four inches of shredded hardwood bark mulch shall be used around all trees within turf areas. All shrub planting beds (within sodded areas) shall have weed barrier fabric, e of shredded bark mulch and Valley -View Black Diamond (or equal) poly edging. The edging shall be placed with smooth curves and at least 3' from the centers of evergreen trees. Utilize curbs and sidewalks for edging where possible. Contractor shall contact Gopher State "One Call" (651-454-0002 or 800-252-1166) to verify locations of all underground utilities. Actual location of plant material is subject to field and site conditions. No planting will be installed until all grading and construction has been completed in the immediate area. Contractor shall provide necessary watering of plant materials until the plant is fully established or irrigation system is operational. Owner will not provide water for Contractor. Provide irrigation to all planted areas on site. Irrigation will be design/build by Landscape Contractor. All information about installation and scheduling can be obtained from General Contractor. Repair, replace, or provide sod/seed as required for any roadway boulevard areas adjacent to the site disturbed during construction. Repair all damage to property from planting operations at no cost to owner. No plant material substitutions will be accepted unless approval is requested of the Landscape Architect by the Landscape Contractor prior to submission of the bid and/or quotation. Sluub retail TOWN s I contolner, set sell mase an ked sell mound matching shrubs groundline with finished site grade (ting beds shall receive 4" of d mulch and weed barrier fabric II planting beds with speeieed ehers adjacent to lawn areas sides and bottom of hole y.,M plant pit with specified backfill veil Plant List CODE QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE OVERSTORY 179 Patmore Ash / Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' 1.5"-3.5" BB Green Mountain Sugar Maple / Acer saccarum 'Green Mountain' 1.5"-3.5" BB Red Oak / Quercus alba 1.5"-3.5" BB Skyline Honeylocust / Gleditsio trocanthos var. inermis 'Skycole' 1.5"-3.5" BB ® Redmond Linden / Tllia americana 'Redmond' 1.5"-3.5" BB Northwood Red Maple / Acer rubrum 'Northland' 1.5"-3.5" BB Bur Oak /Quercus mocrocarpo 1.5"-3.5" BB ORNAMENTAL 54 Prairie Fire Crabapple / Malus x 'Prairie Fire 1.5" BB Spring Snow Crabapple / Malus x 'Spring Snow' 1.5" BB Cockspur Hawthorn / Cratoegus crus-galli 1.5" BB Japanese Tree Lilac / Syringa reticulata 1.5" BB ® Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry / Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 1.5" BB EVERGREEN 81 Black Hills Spruce/Picea giauca densato 6'-8' BB Austrian Pine/Plnus nigra 6'-8' BB Colorado Green Spruce / Picea pungens 6'-8' BB Scotch Pine / Pinus sylvestris W-8' BB Techny Arborvitae / Thuja occidentalis 'Techny' 6'-8' BB SHRUBS 74 Isanti Dogwood / Cornus stolonifera 'Isanti 36" Pot Red Twigged Dogwood / Cornus sericea baileyl 36" Pot Nonnyberry Viburnum / Viburnum lentago 36" Pot Compact American Cranberrybush Viburnum / Viburnum trilobum 'Compacta' 24" Pot Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla lonicera 24" Pot Dwarf Winged Euonymus / Euonymus alatus 'Compactus' 24" Pot 24" Pot NOTES: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. PLANT SYMBOLS ARE DRAWN AT 75% MATURITY 15'/30' BUFFER REQUIREMENT TREE QUANTITIES ARE REFLECTED IN THE PLANT LIST AND ARE NOT SEPARATE QUANTITIES. 15' Buffer Requirements Medium Density Adjacent to Road Buffer Yard Requirement "B" (City Ordinance) 2.0 Canopy Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 4.0 Understory / Ornamental Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 6.0 Shrubs per 100' LF of Buffer Trees Required 707.31 LF / 100 LF = 7.07 7.07 x 2.0 = 14.14 Overstory Trees 7.07 x 4.0 = 28.28 Understory / Ornamental Trees 7.07 x 6.0 = 42.42 Shrubs Trees Provided 9 Overstory Trees 5 8' Evergreen Trees 17 Ornamental Trees 11 6' Evergreen Trees 42 Shrubs NOTES: 31% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 15' BUFFER ARE 8' TALL 69% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 15' BUFFER ARE 6' TALL 30' Buffer Requirements Medium Density Adjacent to Road Buffer Yard Requirement "B" (City Ordinance) 0.8 Canopy Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 1.6 Understory / Ornamental Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 2.4 Shrubs per 100' LF of Buffer Trees Required 494.66 LF / 100 LF = 4.95 4.95 x 0.8 = 3.96 Overstory Trees 4.95 x 1.6 = 7.92 Understory / Ornamental Trees 4.95 x 2.4 = 11.88 Shrubs Trees Provided 4 Overstory Trees 9 8' Evergreen Trees 12 Understory Trees 9 6' Evergreen Trees 32 Shrubs NOTES: 50% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 30' BUFFER ARE 8' TALL 50% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 30' BUFFER ARE 6' TALL Liberty at 0' 100 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-2 20021071PLP01.DWG nate 06/17/05 shaft 6 of 10 Creek Side Preliminary Landscape Plant ©l8D�1888f�i, Minnesota CD Cu Cu Cd N Cd m 3 a 0 a_ o_ CD 0 CUCU CD CD 0 N m 3 / CD 0 (U 0 0 (lJ / 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. . Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 I hereby catlty that this pl- was I I I by me - mder my diad agwv1s m and that I am a dcty limed tANDOCAPa ARCWrBCr md- the ban of the ame of Nausmta. Hdw J. Hawk Dda 02/03/06 Liamae W 16454 2widoae 07/22/05 - Revised Calc: - JWH 07/25/05 - Revised Calce for Tree Pres. Data - JWH 07/26/05 - Revised Title Block - JWH 02/03/06 - Revisions Per City comments - CEF Aemd Rmvft LY/AdtC Tree List ID# Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes 7001 American Elm Saved 12 Saved 7002 American Elm Saved 12 Boxelder 7007 American Elm Saved 20 7074 7010 Boxelder Saved 13 X 7011 White Oak Saved 15 48 12 7012 Aspen _ Saved 22 X 7013 American Elm Saved 15 Boxelder 7014 American Elm Saved 13 7081 7015 American Elm I - Saved 12 7016 Boxelder Saved 15 14 7017 Boxelder Saved 15 Saved 7018 Hackbeny Saved 14 Boxelder 7019 Boxelder Saved 19 7088 7020 Bur Oak Saved 26 X 7021 American EF;_ Saved 16 25 7022 Bur Oak Saved 35 Saved 7023 Bur Oak Saved 32 Boxelder 7026 American_Eim_ Saved 12 7092 ld 7027 Boxeer Saved 14 X 7028 American Elm Saved 12 31 7029 Bur Oak Saved 25 Saved 7032 Boxelder Saved 12 Bur Oak 7033 American Elm -Saved 12 7097 7034 Boxelder _ Saved 13 7035 American Elm Saved 12 34 7036 Boxelder Saved 14 Saved 7037 Boxelder Saved 13 Boxelder 7040 1 Bur Oak Saved 29 7101 7041 1 Bur Oak Saved 17 7042 1 Bur Oak Saved 26 13 7043 Bur Oak Saved 28 Saved12 7044 Bur Oak Saved 34 Boxelder _ 7055 - Boxelder Saved 13 7105 7056 Boxelder Saved 14 X 7057 Boxelder Saved 22 X 7058 Boxelder Saved 18 X 7059 Boxelder Saved 12 Boxelder 7060 Boxelder Saved 13 7109 7061 Boxelder Saved 13 7062 Bur Oak Saved 43 1 18 7063 American Elm Saved 12 Removed 7064 American Elm Saved 13 American Elm 7065 American Elm Saved 12 7113 7066 Boxelder Saved 16 X 7067 Boxelder Saved 12 1 19 7068 Boxelder Saved 26 X 7069 American Elm Saved 22 X 7070 Boxelder Saved 15 7117 7071 Green/White Ash Saved 12 7118 GreenM/hite Ash Removed 13 Trees Off -Site 7119 American Elm Removed I D 7120 Boxelder ID# Species Saved/Removed Cal. in. Notes 294 Sugar Maple Saved 6 X Black Willow Saved 12 13 77003 004 Cottonwood Saved 15 Saved 005 Bur Oak Saved 46 Bur Oak 7006 1 Bur Oak Saved 31 7024 Bur Oak Saved 32 7030 Bur Oak Saved 27 7031 Bur Oak Saved 26 7045 Boxelder Saved 27 X 7046 American Elm Saved 12 7047 American Elm Saved 21 7048 1 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 20 7049 Boxelder Saved 24 X 7050 Boxelder 7051 Boxelder Saved Saved 26 22 X X 7052 Boxelder Saved 16 7084 I American Elm Saved 12 7085 a�Black Willow Saved 45 X 7086 American Elm Saved 21 X 7094 Green/White Ash Saved 16 7176 -Eastern Red Cedar Saved 15 7177 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 17 7178 Boxelder Saved 19 X 7179 Boxelder Saved 16 X 7180 Boxelder Saved 18 X 7181 Boxelder Saved 16 7182 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7183 Boxelder Saved 12 Total Trees (Cal. In.) = 590 Total Cal. In. Removed Total Cal. In. Saved - m I 0 590 7 ID# Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes 7072 Boxelder Saved 15 7073 Boxelder _ - 'Saved 12 7074 Boxelder Saved 29 X 7075 7076 Bur Oak Boxelder Saved Saved 48 12 7077 7078 7079 Boxelder Boxelder Boxelder Saved Saved Saved 12 36 _ 27 X 7080 Boxelder Saved 12 7081 Boxelder Saved 12 7082 Boxelder Saved 14 7083 Boxelder Saved 12 7087 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7088 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7089 Bur Oak Saved 25 7090 Boxelder Saved 13 7091 Boxelder Saved 16 7092 Boxelder Saved 18 X 7093 Black Willow Saved 31 X 7095 Bur Oak Saved 40 7096 Bur Oak Saved 39 7097 Bur Oak Saved 23 7098 Bur Oak Saved 34 7099 Boxelder Saved 14 7100 Boxelder Saved 27 X 7101 Green/White Ash Saved 12 7102 Boxelder Saved 13 7103 Boxelder Saved12 19 7104 Boxelder Removed 25 X 7105 BoxelderT Removed � 26 X 7106 Boxelder Removed- 33 X 7107 Boxelder Removed 37 X 7108 Boxelder Removed - 22 X 7109 Bur Oak Removed 18 7110 Boxelder Removed 1 18 7111 Boxelder Removed _ 13 X 7112 American Elm Removed 12 X 7113 American Elm Removed __T 16 7114 American Elm Removed 1 19 X 7115 Boxelder Removed 21 X 7116 American Elm Removed 14 7117 American Elm Removed 15 7118 GreenM/hite Ash Removed 13 7119 American Elm Removed 15 D 7120 Boxelder Removed 15 X 7121 Boxelder Removed 18 X 7123 Boxelder Saved 13 7124 Bur Oak Saved 20 7125 Bur Oak Saved 21 Legend ( Tree to Remain ® Tree to be Removed Tree Preservation Data - Medium Density Residential Gross Site Area Net Site Area (less wetland & steep slopes) Gross Canopy Cover Net Canopy (less wetlands & steep slopes) Baseline Canopy Cover (5.4 Ac / 30.87 Ac = 17.5%) Required Canopy (20%) (30.87 X .20 = 6.2 Ac.) Canopy Needed (6.2 Ac - 5.4 Ac = 0.8 Ac.) Canopy Removed (1.01 Ac. to grading limit line) Replacement Required (0.8 Ac. X 1.2 Ac. = 0.95 Ac. Canopy Needed Above Existing Canopy) (1.01 Ac X 1.2 Ac = 1.21 Ac. Canopy Removed) Total Replacement Required (0.96 Ac. + 1.21 Ac. = 2.17 Ac.) Required Trees (2.17 Ac. x 43,560 SF = 94,525 SF / 1089) Landscape Trees Provided Prepared for. TOWN & COUNTRY ROME aX.xamwo*co 36.01 +/- Ac. 30.87 Ac. 7.4 Ac. 5.4 Ac. 17.5% 6.2 Ac. 0.8 Ac. 1.01 Ac. 0.96 Ac. 1.21 Ac. 2.17 Ac. 87 Trees 260 Trees _ ID# 7126 Species BoxelderSaved SavedlRemoved -, Cal. In. 16 Notes 7127 Boxelder Saved 12 7128 Boxelder Saved 13 7129 Boxelder Saved 12 7130 Boxelder Saved 17 7131 Boxelder Saved 14 7132 Boxelder Saved 19 7133 Boxelder Saved 16 7134 Boxelder Saved 15 7135 Boxelder Removed 14 7136 Boxelder Removed 36 7137 Boxelder Removed 12 7138 Boxelder Removed 15 7139 Boxelder Removed 12 7140 American Elm Saved 14 7141 American Elm Removed 21 7142 Bur Oak Saved 31 7143 -Bur Saved 30 7144'_ Cottonwood Saved 30 7147 Black Willow Saved 14 7148 Boxelder Saved 20 7149„ American Elm Saved 22 7150 American Elm Saved 12 7151 ; American Elm Saved 13 7152 _t Boxelder Saved 12 7153 Boxelder Saved 19 7154 American Elm Saved 12 7155 American Elm Saved 13 7156 Siberian Elm Saved 29 X 7157 Siberian Elm Saved 16 7158 American Elm Removed 26 X 7159 Boxelder Saved 19 7160 Boxelder Saved 19 7161 Boxelder Saved 30 X 7162 Boxelder Saved 12 7163 Bur Oak Saved 27 7164 Boxelder Saved 13 7165 Boxelder Saved 21 X 7166 American Elm Saved 14 7167 American Elm Saved 19 7168 Boxelder Saved 16 7169 Bur Oak Saved 32 7170 Basswood Saved 16 X 7171 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 15 7172 Cottonwood Saved 15 7174 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 20 7175 Sugar Maple Saved 36 Total Trees (Cal. In.) = 2882 Total Cal. In. Removed 486 Total Cal. In. Saved 2853 Tree Protection Detail EICVatJOII um Orange Mesh Construction Fence Location as shown on plan Stake every 6' maximum. ax. Post or Equal ige Construction :e Staked Every 6' Liberty at Creek Side Notes 1. Pruning will be done by professionals during appropriate pruning season. 2. No storage of materials, operation of machinery, or development of any sort will occur within the fence -line without approval in writing from the City. 3. Site grading to be done only after protective measures have been taken, city has approved fencing locations, and all contractors have been briefed on tree preservation techniques. 0 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-2 20021071TPP01.DWG Date 06/17/05 sheet: 7 of 10 Tree Inventory Plan wl 3 0 H n o_ N 0 0 N 11m 3 75 o_ N 0 0 N 'a7 '17 e2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Note: Silt fence per MNDOT specifications, source 2000, machine sliced woven monofilament, 36"wide fastened steel T -Pasts with 3(501b) tens strength plastic zip ties per T -Post. (Machine sliced) e'mo g �:Ta�y[��aZaPtt:7]a T Posts 24' in ground Ties Mn. Depth of sal /mice embeanenL Note: Type 2 silt fence is the same as type I with hay bales installed as per detail. Type 2 to be used to protect all wetlands. Zip Ties er Str"w Bola ro we m., nm 3•mq� er is n rd r• n.ODrL m.mr�oCer. vma Bra va b r W .n a ,",Dggtlr Ybp. CITY OF SILT CSAWSA1121 FENCE REOISED:2-97, I-021-03, 1-01 DATE; 2-97 PLATE NO.:5*11100 FILE NAME: 303—WW 0 PL 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT POB�\C� FILTER FABRIC ' 6" MINIMUM DEPTH 1" — 2" WASHED rc \�5+��M \lilo 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM 2� MiNiM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE -7 NOTE: FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. CSANBASSEN ROCK NTRANCEON REVISED:1-99 DATE: 2-97 PLATE NO, 5301 FILE NAME 393_33D7 TYPI NOTE: Silt fence per MNDOT specifications, source 200, machine sliced woven monofilament, 36" wide fastened to steel T—Posts with 3(501b) tensile strength plastic zip ties per T—Post.(machine sliced) RUNOFF Iter wTH FILTERED WATER--- SECTION ATER)SECTION AA CITY OF OFF ROAD CB CSANSASSEN FILTER BARRIER REIISM.1-04 DAM; 2-01 PLATE NO.: 5302 FILE N E:393_5302 C SECTION (31' BACK TO BACK) REFER TO PLAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS & EXACT SIDEWALK LOCATION CL / 30' ROW 30' ROW 15.5' 13.Er ✓w MATS/BLP SHOULD B INSTALLED VERTICALL DOWNSLOF 6"-3A32 CONCRETE 4" CLASS 5 COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE WALKWAY n—r RT ATA r nu ISOMETRIC VIEW FILTER FABRIC UNDER TYPICAL TREATMENT NOTE: WET SLOPE LINING 1. SLOPE SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, 7 CLODS, STICKS AND GRASS. MATS/BLANKETS SHALL HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT ON BLANKETS O Oi RF REINFORCEMEN 2. LAY BLANKETS LOOSELY AND STAKE OR MATS SLOPE STAPLE TO MAINTAIN DIRECT CONTACT WITH INSTALLATION THE SOIL. DO NOT STRETCH 2.0% 1-1/2" — MnDOT 2350 LVWE350308 WEAR COURSE MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" — MnDOT 2350 LVNW35030B BASE COURSE 12" — CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED STONE 24" MnDOT 3149.2B SELECT GRANULAR BORROW COMPACTED SUBGRADE I hereby cotlty Sher fhb prem wn prepared by me Or a3 m my lit . Westwood Professional Services Inc, � � lam of the 9� O'"` Services, 02/03/06 Revisions Per City Comments 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 1'13r1n �,jOe�]" pg Phone: 952-937.5'150 Fax: 952-937-5822 ANe Q2�D3�06 T.icme Na �� 10' 1. DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 0 0 SLOPE VARIES -SEE PLAN VIEW FOR SPECIFIC SIDE FOR SIDEWALK 1 Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 DIRECTION OF FLOW ON LOT J STREET PROFILE _ _ _ _ _ _ 0.5 — — 0.5 DIRECTION 0� STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION (24' BACK TO BACK) 12.00' VARIES _ ROLLS OF SOD BACK OF CURB (TYP) cu nPF VARIES 1-1/2" MnDOT SPEC. 2350 LVWE35030B WEAR COURSE MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" MnDOT SPEC. 2350 LVNW35030B BASE COURSE 6" MnOOT SPEC. 2211 CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE BASE 24" MnDOT SPEC. 3149.28 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side LOT BENCHING C-2 20021071DTP01.DWG Date: 06/17/05 Sheet 9 OF 10 Pre ' ary Grading Details Z Z Z Z 7 7 7 O Oi O J DIRECTION OF FLOW ON LOT J STREET PROFILE _ _ _ _ _ _ 0.5 — — 0.5 DIRECTION 0� STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION (24' BACK TO BACK) 12.00' VARIES _ ROLLS OF SOD BACK OF CURB (TYP) cu nPF VARIES 1-1/2" MnDOT SPEC. 2350 LVWE35030B WEAR COURSE MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" MnDOT SPEC. 2350 LVNW35030B BASE COURSE 6" MnOOT SPEC. 2211 CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE BASE 24" MnDOT SPEC. 3149.28 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side LOT BENCHING C-2 20021071DTP01.DWG Date: 06/17/05 Sheet 9 OF 10 Pre ' ary Grading Details H N U E 0_ W Cl) �D Lr) M 0 0 N (") N m 3 a N 0- o_ 1p ra 0 N 0 0 N 0 3 a / r, 0 N N 0 ru 0 / ,. c 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. L.P. ELEV = 882.16 L.P. STA = 42+21.78 PVI STA = 42+30 PVI ELEV = 882.00 90' A.D. = 1.46 Od K = 61.54 —00-190' VC � 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 STREET A DATUM ELEV 885.00 1+00 O !� to + Go N II II a > ~ J W 5 g 0- o - CENTERLINE GRADE (TYP.) PVI STA = 6+90 PVI ELEV = 909.63 A.D. _ –1.00 d� K = 90.33 O 90' VC Od �a LO LO O00 MM r N CO+ 0) M 00 r7 n 00(D II 0) a � W it 5 II STING CENTERLINE GRADE (TYP.) .—� = 902.67 m� 20+40.25 O� = 20+40 �—� N^ = 903.80 d� –6.02 K = O ��— 150' f� Od �a O)d O00 MM r O� -M 00� 4O�0)N0rn0)� r7 M1 00(D N^ �M 0)01 N� 0) ��Ndaoo^ OOi�OOi01�0)Q1 1 00 110 O) a O) r7 � O) qt 0 �n rn Cb w 0 0 a 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 STREET C Wastwood PfVkS O W 5arvio 16 me 7899 Anagram Drim Eden Pratrte, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5872 TOLL FREE 1.08JM-5150 wwwwestwoodps aom I h-eby mlu, that tbb plm .eme III by see or t myI a.� dhed eepmsldm and tbet I em ■ duty uommd pAOP®BIONAL ffi CUSIM �— me boss of the Shft of bnummahL 02/03/06 Revisions Per City Comments Chris Moehri, PH Data OM03/06 Uum a Na 0 OR m 0) 00 II J W 5 a - H.P. ELEV = 902.67 H.P. STA = 20+40.25 PVI STA = 20+40 PVI ELEV = 903.80 A.D. _ –6.02 K = 24.91 ��— 150' VC ---�; PVI STA = 24+43.50 PVI ELEV = 891.69 A.D. _ –2.00 K = 20.01 PVI STA = 24+83.50 PVI ELEV = 889.69 A.D. = 2.00 K = 20.00 40' VC I I 40' VC O� u7- IC -0, LqN) O� O)0 Nro OO 016 tp5 O0 Q OQ mQ 0)� O)� 0) O)� 0) 0)6)o)—'l0)0) Orn 00 O) 0000 00 of a0 o0 00 io CO 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 STREET B H.P. ELEV = 888.63 H.P. STA = 50+17.15 PVI STA = 50+20 PVI ELEV = 888.73 A.D. = –2.00 K = 20.00 DATUM EL 875.00 25+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 STREET D NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CMN Prepared for. matte®& cam TOWN Oman AN ry Yeamd Mnft */data STREET E M 00 00 00 II 1 W J DATUM ELE4 875.00 60+00 61+00 62+00 Liberty at Creek Side Clanhassm, Minnesota Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 C-2 20021071DTP02.DWG Date 06/17/05 sheet 10 OF 10 PreliminaU Street Profiles U Q 00 O r 0 a U 0 0 N O O N 3 0 N 0 O C11 02005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. for ucti Preliminary Plat Sub mittal for Liberty at Creek Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: n—ti TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES a K. H0% Avian, conwam .__� __ i� ✓yh i;<�� '}SAL-di�. 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Praire, Minnesota 55344 Contact: Kevin Clark Phone: (952) 253-0462 Fax: (952) 944-3437 Prepared by: . Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Project number: 20021071.00 Contact: Chris Moehrl, P.E. Side VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE OO cr. ¢GD P �WNIRYI�CN `,4� y� 49 cnnN BLm 1014THI.Y HiVD. N F'�, � -,y� % 1 -y i LYMAN BLVD zeztine Lax epwr �v � 44 LL � 4 k NO. DATE INDEX SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 1 COVER ALL 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 5 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 7 PRELIMINARY TREE INVENTORY PLAN 8 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 9 PRELIMINARY DETAILS 10 PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE OO cr. ¢GD P �WNIRYI�CN `,4� y� 49 cnnN BLm 1014THI.Y HiVD. N F'�, � -,y� % 1 -y i LYMAN BLVD zeztine Lax epwr �v � 44 LL � 4 k NO. DATE REVISION SHEETS 1 02/03/06 Revisions Per City Comments ALL 2 04/06/06 Plan Change 1,3-10 3 07/11/06 Site Layout Change (WRW) 1,3-9 ,,T' H OF CHANTEN p� g� RECEIVED JUL 1 1 2006 e tt � ` F�(. � O yi' ANHAssEN PLANqn '".� '� G , t— C 4 CM �NINGDEPi Construction Plans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota Date: 06/17/05 Sheet- 1 of 10 a_ , _ C-2 20021071CVP1 ®2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. F- I / `t / n I LEGEND % r on line %ofe CONIFEROUS TREE (surveyed) ELECTRIC METER 1 f the NW'9/4E Z�Oo I` DECIDUOUS TREE (surveyed) ELECTRIC MANHOLE / WETLAND SANITARY MANHOLE STEEL/WOOD POST ® CATCH BASIN 00. -�, <� west line of the SIGN-TRAFFIC OTHER tttt 1/4 of the NW 1, ® FLARED END SECTION F _ / N00 °08'59 "W 742.38 S8 a.� MAIL BOX n STORM MANHOLE ORP I ❑T TELEPHONE BOX eat ° _. - 1 . '� — — — G PERC TEST (I f r / Y � � / • � � � N00008'590W 704.91 r', Mw MONITORING WELL �a GATE VALVE I o CABLE TV BOX • �+�'�• J f I I CT a D O I I (c GAS METER OO HYDRANT L.11/ t STREET LITE —Porgy POWER POWER OVERHEAD GUY WIRE X FENCE LINE f 1 1 r0' POWER POLE- DECIDUOUS TREE LINE \ / ❑E ELECTRIC BOX O Denotes Set Iron Monument /ted,,,... ® •r �,r / �` ! I - / / / \ \ • Denotes Found Iron Monument !� ,T "^- �� ! _ \ � _� � ° 1 / / • Denotes Cost Iron Monument O U .. / '--".,,.. � � � � �" = �, • � _` _ � � / r / ''� ,; ,� -' � 90 � VICINITY MAP '� ✓ 'fir e �✓ \ P / ��o..� .,� / r� \ NOT To SCALE J k A A i f 11�_u i it kA T / X\ Legal Description w The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23 (referred 40' Bluff Creek Overlay District to herein as Tract A). II I I Building Setback ` - \ \ \ \ ~ ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest comer of Section 23 Township 116, Range 23,• thence -- running North on Section line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Section; thence West 30 feet Iv \ oo ine 3 to said Southwest corner of said Section and place of beginning. Being a three-comered piece in Southwest corner of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23. J a /� 1 % �l ; I rt \ �� r o T •! r i r'( j ALSO: Beginning at the southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of / Prkn Bluff eek Overlay -1/ I TA o `^- -- -�-� Section 26, Township 116 North of Range 23 West; thence south along the quarter-quarter f / / section line distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14; thence east along the north line Dist ct Line (fyp. / \ \ } �' / I % f \ of said Carver County Road No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the / j 'l J \ aforementioned quarter-quarter section 827 feet to a point 26 feet north of the east-west quarter-quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26; thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter-quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of beginning (referred to herein as Tract B.) EXCEPT., that part of Tract A which lies Easterly of Line 1 described below. / , ..•j314-�- ` Line 1. Commencing at the north quarter corner of said Section 26, thence run west an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section for 1634.23 feet to 1 the paint of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 o minutes 41 seconds far 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 478.28 feet, thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for U �- 1 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating; ' —�- - M 9• ` / f I ' 1 —�„Q ' / t and EXCEPT that port of Tract B which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of Line 2 0 4 ,� j I —� �� _'�� '�..�VL described below., v A �/ `� �� — — — — — Line 2: Commencing at the point of termination of Line 1 described above; thence run east on a _ M „_, azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 seconds along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of said section for 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be o �, ! described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds for 448.73 feet, thence N - � � - \ r ® � on an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 feet; thence on an azimuth of 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet, thence on an azimuth of 99 degrees 25 N.k °l / / minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating. / 1 \ Together with right of access retained in Quit Claim Deed Document No. 310751 pursuant to 3 / / / !" ! / — —/ / ( / 1 \ Access Driveway Permit dated 8-26-2002. Total Site Area: 36.01 acres Ld ni m \ 0' 100' 200' 300' N C-2 20021071EXP01.DWG Dates 6/17/05 s 2 of 10 a { Liberty at I hereby oatlfy that this pleas was peepered by me m mida myPrepared (�y��^ �[�j�j�ac\J . diced eupervidon u,d that I .m a duly of Mhd 1'ROP> IONAL Bei ' � •� f°�: i 1{I16 d Creek Side - Westwood Professional Services, Inc. ti[IxVHY � law. of � st.ee � 02/03/06 Revisions Per City Comments CWU i ((`j Existing Conditions/ TOWN 1Ai i•� i t7�i V LT � �f Q 7599 Anagram Drive Dtawm BBB L O YY lY & COUNTRl. i 1ONTS Survey Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Ca{8 W. Phone: 952-937.5150 Fax: 952-937.5822 Due 02/03/06 Ltomae No. 23021 Beooird Dttwtng by/daft ry 12 ter. ChBI►h888en. Minnesota 3 a 0 N d r o_ N 0 0 N m 3 a o_ N 0 0 N pl 0 2005 West all i X s`=-Cw---`.- BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY / DISTICT SETBACK (TYP)--f- 5 i TYP)--/-5' CONCRETE / SIDEWALK ROCK CONSTRUCTION LOWEST FLOOR (TY '1E ' r GARAGE GRADE (TYP) FINISH GRADE AT BACK 1 © OF BUILDING (TYP L 1 1 I WATER LINE AT CREEK (TYP) 10' WIDE BIT. TRAIL (REIMBURSED BY CITY) 100' BLUFF CREEK SETBACK LINE\, OM CENTERLINE�O��F CREEK (TYP) \ PROP(75L4� 40' WETLAND \ BUFFER SETBACK TYP) \ PROPOSED 16.5' WETLAN \ ..�--676,_,_.BUFFER LINE (TYP) \ \ ` HEAVY DUTY SILT , FENCE (TYP) 1.01 y \ qeR �~ 10140 1 1'\ ° UFF CR EK 0 RLAY DISTRICT ` 1 GR ING L. IT LINE (TYP) l I (TYP) ~ TAINING WALL D SIG ED BY OTHERS T (TYP) I hereby certify that " plea was prepared by me or Anda my Rewidanx . direct supervision and tha I am a duly 0aeaeed PROFESSIONAL Westwood Professional Services, Inc. ENOMM,„yad//aa�J�/,e,.wa t� Mja�. 02/03/08 Raveione Ps City Comments ( i" 04/08/08 Plan Change (WR1A� 7599 Anagram Drive 07/11/05 site Layout Change (M1t'f) Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Chris MoehrJ, FR Phone: 952.937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Data 07/11/06 IJwse Na "M Inj r POND B OUTLET= 870.0 H WL= 871.5 t v \ \ POND A \� N $© I . ena X "A mi TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: • ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN—PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON—SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. • ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. • PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST & BE USED AS TEMPORARY PONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. PERFERATED OUTLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED. • THE SITE MUST BE STABALIZED WITH A 50B SEED MIX & TYPE I MULCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE PLACED AROUND THEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT. • THE SITE SHALL BE STABALIZED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF FINAL GRADE COMPLETION. • ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TO RESTORE TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION. • ALL EXPOSED SOILS NOT TO BE GRADED FOR: 7 DAYS (2 3:1 SLOPES), 14 DAYS (10:1 TO 3:1), OR 21 DAYS (10:1 OR FLATTER) SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED. GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: • ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD—VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. • ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES. • POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. • ALL RETAINING WALLS TO BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCMA STANDARDS • TOPSOIL RESPREAD SHALL BE 0.5' ON PADS AND 0.5' ON OTHER GREEN AREAS. DRIVEWAY GRADES ARE TAKEN TO THE CURB & GUTTER OF PUBLIC STREETS WHERE THERE IS NO SIDEWALK. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side CL8II1hassm, M =eeata C-2 20021071GDPOI.DWG Date 06/17/05 sheet 5 OF 10 Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan DENOTES SOIL BORING DENOTES SILT FENCE DENOTES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS x'980 DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS --'= DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER F►►--■ DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER iwvv� DENOTES EXISTING TREE LINE DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE W� REMOVAL LIMITS x 856.3 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION x6g:�a DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW E.O.F. ELEVATION DENOTES EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (MNDOT 3885, CATAGORY 3, WOOD FIBER 2S.) DENOTES BLUFF AREA • 0' 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side CL8II1hassm, M =eeata C-2 20021071GDPOI.DWG Date 06/17/05 sheet 5 OF 10 Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan F- U M Co (U n O O CU i7 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952.937.5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 mt misdirected branches orders Intact L" depth of specified mulch over Its - do not pHs against trunk plant pit with specified bockfill soil aides and bottom of hole a American Standard for Nursery Stock himum ball size. I' deep watering basin _>t ball on undisturbed subsoil or compacted loll mound matching trees natural groundline with flnished site grade I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervidon and that I am a duly licensed LANDSCAPE AeCWrECr meds the lam of the state of WnnesM" 18dw J. Hasek Delle 07/11/06 IJomse No. 16454 07/%005 - Revised Plant List and Buffy Requirements - JNH 07/26/05 - n. -', sed title bloc[ and Into shown an plan - JWH 02/03/06 - Revisions Ps Clty Comments - CEF 04/06/06 - Plan Changes - CIEF 07/11/06 site Layout Change (WRth out misdirected branches leaders intact and staking Is optional of stakes 5' above ground (max.) or to first branch. am of stake 3' (min.) below ground Ing posts to be 2'X2' stained wood or painted I delineator porta. e 3 posts equidistant around and outside root ball. ire tree to posts with 16' long polypropylene or ethylene, 40 mil, 1 1/2' wide strap. wrapping Is called toi, wrap from Mrs upward to first branches 4" depth of specified mulch over pits - do not pile against trunk tl plant pit with specified backfill soil y sides and bottom of hole to American Standard for Nursery Stock inimum ball size. 3" deep watering basin sot ball on undisturbed subaoll or compacted soil mound matching trees natural groundline with finished site grade Planting Notes Contractor shall provide one year guarantee of all plant materials. The guarantee begins on the date of the Landscape Architect's or Owner's written acceptance of the initial planting. Replacement plant materials shall also have a one year guarantee commencing upon planting. All plants to be specimen grade, Minnesota -grown and/or hardy. Specimen grade shall adhere to, but is not limited by, the following standards: All plants shall be free from disease, pests, wounds, scars, etc. All plants shall be free from noticeable gaps, holes, or deformities. All plants shall be free from broken or dead branches. All plants shall have heavy, healthy branching and leafing. Coniferous trees shall have an established main leader and a height to width ratio of no less than 5:3. Plants to meet American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI 60.1-1990) requirements for size and type specified. Plants to be installed as per standard ANSI planting practices. Use minimum 12" loam planting soil on trees and 6" on shrubs (sides and bottom of hole). Backfill soil to be existing top soil from site free of roots, rocks larger than one inch, subsoil debris, and large weeds. Contractor shall verify locations with all utilities prior to installation of plants. Staking of trees optional; reposition, plumb and stake if not plumb after one year. Wrap all smooth -barked trees - fasten top and bottom. Remove by April 1. Open top of burlap on BB materials; remove pot on potted plants; split and break apart peat pots. Prune plants as necessary - per standard nursery practice and to correct poor branching., Plants shall be immediately planted upon arrival at site. Properly heel -in materials if necessary, temporary only. All disturbed areas to be sodded unless otherwise noted: sod to be standard Minnesota grown and hardy bluegrass mix. All sod areas shall be prepared with 4" of topsoil and raked to remove debris and ensure drainage. Slopes of 3:1 or greater shall be staked. Four inches of shredded hardwood bark mulch shall be used around all trees within turf areas. All shrub planting beds (within sodded areas) shall have weed barrier fabric, 4" of shredded bark mulch and Valley -View Black Diamond (or equal) poly edging. The edging shall be placed with smooth curves and at least 3' from the centers of evergreen trees. Utilize curbs and sidewalks for edging where possible. Contractor shall contact Gopher State "One Call" (651-454-0002 or 600-252-1166) to verify locations of all underground utilities. Actual location of plant material is subject to field and site conditions. No planting will be installed until all grading and construction has been completed in the immediate area. Contractor shall provide necessary watering of plant materials until the plant is fully established or irrigation system is operational. Owner will not provide water for Contractor. Provide irrigation to all planted areas on site. Irrigation will be design/build by Landscape Contractor. All information about installation and scheduling can be obtained from General Contractor. Repair, replace, or provides' d/seed as required for any roadway boulevard areas adjacent to the site disturbed during construction. Repair all damage to property from planting operations at no cost to owner. No plant material substitutions will be accepted unless approval is requested of the Landscape Architect by the Landscape Contractor prior to submission of the bid and/or quotation. Shrub Detail Prepared for. nt TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES h A. Hnvunm•Ca,mry container, set soil mass on ted soli mound matching shrubs groundline with finished site grade ting beds shall receive 4" of I mulch and weed barrier fabric planting beds with specified here adjacent to lawn areas sides and bottom of hole plant pit with specified backfill soli Plant List CODE QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE OVERSTORY 179 Patmore Ash / Froxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' 1.5"-3.5" BB Green Mountain Sugar Maple / Acer saccarum 'Green Mountain' 1.5"-3.5" BB Red Oak / Quercus alba 1.5"-3.5" BB Skyline Honeylocust / Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Skycole' 1.5"-3.5" BB Redmond Linden / Tylia americana 'Redmond' 1.5"-3.5" BB ® Northwood Red Maple / Acer rubrum 'Northland' 1.5"-3.5" BB Bur Oak /Quercus macrocarpa 1.5"-3.5" BB ORNAMENTAL 54 Prairie Fire Crabapple / Malus x 'Prairie Fire 1.5" BB Spring Snow Crabapple / Malus x 'Spring Snow' 1.5" BB Cockspur Hawthorn / Cratoegus crus-galli 1.5" BB Japanese Tree Lilac / Syringa reticulata 1.5" BB ® Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry / Amelonchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 1.5" BB EVERGREEN 81 Black Hills Spruce/Picea glauca densata 6'-8' BB Austrian Pine/Pinus nigra 6'-8' BB Colorado Green Spruce / Picea pungens 6'-8' BB Scotch Pine / Pinus sylvestris 6'-8' BB Techny Arborvitae / Thuja occidentalis 'Techny 6'-8' BB SHRUBS 74 Isonti Dogwood / Cornus stolonifera 'Isar 36" Pot Red Twigged DogwoodComus sericea baileyi Nonnyberry Viburnum %Viburnum lentago 36" Pot 36" Pot Compact American Cranberrybush Viburnum / Viburnum trilobum 'Compacta' 24" Pot Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla lonicera 24" Pot Dwarf Winged Euonymus / Euonymus alotus 'Compactus' 24" Pot 24" Pot NOTES: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE UST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. PLANT SYMBOLS ARE DRAWN AT 75% MATURITY 15'/30' BUFFER REQUIREMENT TREE QUANTITIES ARE REFLECTED IN THE PLANT LIST AND ARE NOT SEPARATE QUANTITIES. 15' Buffer Requirements Medium Density Adjacent to Road Buffer Yard Requirement "B" (City Ordinance) 2.0 Canopy Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 4.0 Understory / Ornamental Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 6.0 Shrubs per 100' LF of Buffer Trees Required 707.31 LF / 100 LF = 7.07 7.07 x 2.0 = 14.14 Overstory Trees 7.07 x 4.0 = 28.28 Understory / Ornamental Trees 7.07 x 6.0 = 42.42 Shrubs Trees Provided 9 Overstory Trees 5 8' Evergreen Trees 17 Ornamental Trees 11 6' Evergreen Trees 42 Shrubs NOTES: 31% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 15' BUFFER ARE 8' TALL 69% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 15' BUFFER ARE 6' TALL 30' Buffer Requirements Medium Density Adjacent to Road Buffer Yard Requirement "B" (City Ordinance) 0.8 Canopy Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 1.6 Understory / Ornamental Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 2.4 Shrubs per 100' LF of Buffer Trees Required 494.66 LF / 100 LF = 4.95 4.95 x 0.8 = 3.96 Overstory Trees 4.95 x 1.6 = 7.92 Understory / Ornamental Trees 4.95 x 2.4 = 11.88 Shrubs Trees Provided 4 Overstory Trees 9 8' Evergreen Trees 12 Understory Trees 9 6' Evergreen Trees 32 Shrubs NOTES: 50% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 30' BUFFER ARE 8' TALL 50% OF EVERGREENS PROVIDED IN THIS 30' BUFFER ARE 6' TALL 0' 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-2 20021071PLPOI.DWG Date: 06/17/05 situ 6 OF 10 Liberty at Creek Side Preliminary Landscape Plan Chanhassen, Minnesota F W U E 0i N 0 0 0 (1J rn 3 CD o_ a k - n 0 (u CD CD 0 (L i 75 m 3 CD 0 cu CU 0 0 CU ail Qq - 0 X 941.0 °t Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 e2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. X Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937.5150 Fax: 952-937.5822 I hereby aerefy that this plea we. Prepared by me m under my direct supervision and the I am a daly licensed LANDSCAPE ARC1UrBCr ander the laws of the state of u+ -nom Hdw J. Hank Data 07/11/06 Liamee No. 164% Reeldame 07/22/05 - Revised Colce - JM 07/25/05 - Revised Calce for Tree Pree. Data - JVM 07/26/05 - Revised Title Black - JW 02/03/06 - Revisions Per City comments - CEF 04/06/06 - Plan Changes - CEF 07/11/06 Site Layout Change (WRW) uoa.3 X Tree Inventory List X t ID# Species Saved/Removed Cal. in. Notes ID# Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes ID# Species Saved/Removed Cal. In, Notes 7001 American Elm Removed 12 7072 Boxelder Saved 15 7126 Boxelder Saved 16 7002 American Elm Removed 12 7073 Boxelder Saved 12 7127 Boxelder Saved 12 7007 American Elm Saved 20 7074 Boxelder Saved 29 X 7128 Boxelder Saved 13 7010 Boxelder _ Saved 13 7075 Bur Oak Saved 48 7129 Boxelder Saved 12 7011 White Oak Saved 15 7076 Boxelder Saved 12 7130 Boxelder Saved 17 f7012 Aspen Saved 22 X 7077 Boxelder Saved 12 7131 Boxelder Saved 14 7013 American Elm Saved 15 7078 Boxelder Saved 36 X 7132 Boxelder Saved 19 j X 868.9 \ 7014 American Elm Saved 13 � 7079 Boxelder Saved 27 7133 Boxelder Saved 16 7015 American Elm Saved 12 7080 Boxelder Saved 12 ! 7134 Boxelder Saved 15 7016 Boxelder Saved 15�7081 Boxelder Saved 12 7135 Boxelder Removed 14 7017 Boxelder Saved 15- 1 7082 Boxelder Saved 14 7136 Boxelder Removed 36 ,.. - ,\ 7018 Hackberry Saved 14 7083 Boxelder Saved 12 7137 Boxelder Removed 12 7019 Boxelder Saved 19 7087 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7138 Boxelder Removed 15 7020 Bur Oak Saved 26 7088 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7139 Boxelder Removed 12 I_ 7021 American Elm Saved 16 7089 Bur Oak Saved 25 j 7140 American Elm Saved 14 i_ - 7022 Bur Oak Saved 35 7090 Boxelder Saved 13 _ 7141 American Elm Removed 21 7023 Bur Oak Saved 32 7091 Boxelder Saved 16 rr 7142 Bur Oak Saved 31 7026 American Elm Saved 12 7092 Boxelder Saved 18 X 7143 ` Bur Oak Saved 30 7027 Boxelder Saved 14 7093 Black Willow Saved 31 X j 7144 Cottonwood Saved 30 7028 American Elm Saved 12 7095 ' Bur Oak Saved 40 r 7147 's. Black Willow Saved 14 '* 7029 Bur Oak Saved 25 7096 Bur Oak Saved 39 7148 Boxelder Saved 20 E~ 7032 Boxelder Saved 12 7097 Bur Oak Saved 23 7149 American Elm Saved 22 J X ( 7033 American Elm Saved 12 7098 Bur Oak Saved 34 7150 American Elm Saved 12 Boxelder Saved 883.0 -- ' 7034 13 7099 Boxelder Saved 14 ' 7151 American Elm Saved 13 7035 American Elm Saved - 12 7100 Boxelder Saved 27 X ± 7152 Boxelder Saved 12 884.3 7036 Boxelder Saved 14 7101 Green/White Ash Saved 12-� 7153 Boxelder Saved 19 883.6 X 7037 Boxelder Saved 13 7102 Boxelder Saved 13 i" 7154 American Elm Saved 12 -.. .-_ 7040 Bur Oak Saved 29 7103'- Boxelder Saved 12 � 7155 American Elm Saved 13 7041 Bur Oak Saved 17 ' 7104 Boxelder Removed 25 X 7156 Siberian Elm Saved 29 X 7042 Bur Oak Saved 26 7105 Boxelder _ Removed 26 X 7157 Siberian Elm Saved 16 X 7043 Bur Oak Saved 287--7-1-0-6-7-Boxelder Removed 33 X 7158 American Elm Removed 26 X 884.4 7044 Bur Oak Saved 34 7107 Boxelder Removed 37 X 7159 Boxelder Saved 19 „_. 7055 Boxelder Saved 13 7108 Boxelder L Removed 22 7160 Boxelder Saved 19 ! 3 7056 Boxelder Saved 14 7109 Bur Oak Removed 18 7161 Boxelder _ Saved 30 X 7057 Boxelder Saved 22 X 7110 Boxelder Removed 18 7162 Boxelder Saved 12 7058 Boxelder Saved 18 X x7111 Boxelder Removed fi 13 7163 Bur Oak Saved 27 7059 Boxelder Saved 12 7112 American Elm Removed 12 X 7164 Boxelder Saved 13 7060 Boxelder Saved 13 7113 American Elm Removed 16 7165 Boxelder Saved 21 X _ 7061 Boxelder Saved 13 7114 American Elm Removed 19 X 7166 American Elm Saved 14 7062 Bur Oak Saved 43 7115 Boxelder Removed 21 7167 American Elm Saved 18 .. .. 7063 American Elm Saved 12 _� 7116 American Elm Removed 14 7168 Boxelder Saved 16 I 7064 American Elm Saved 13 7117 American Elm Removed 1. 15 7169 Bur Oak Saved 32 7065 American Elm Saved 12 7118 Green/White Ash Removed�. 13 7170 Basswood Saved 16 X E -. X 7066 Boxelder Saved 16 X 7119 American Elm Removed 15 D 7171 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 15 7067 Boxelder Saved 12 ! 7120 Boxelder Removed 15 : 7172 Cottonwood Saved 15 7068 Boxelder Saved 26 X� 7121 Boxelder Removed 18 X 7174 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 20 7069 American Elm Saved 22 X 7123 Boxelder Saved 13 7175 Sugar Maple Saved 36 7070 Boxelder Saved 15 7124 Bur Oak Saved 20 7071 Green/White Ash Saved 12 �� 7125 Bur Oak Saved 21 Total Trees (Cal. In.) = 2749 rTrees Off -Site - Total Cal In Removed 510 __.._..._.-® ®/---- }-- Total Cal In Saved P829 860.6 X _--. ( ID # Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes 3294 Sugar Maple Saved 6 Legend 7003 Black Willow Saved 12 '1\`X 660.2 7004 Cottonwood Saved 15 ------- --- --- - !----,_ J Q�P i 7005 Bur Oak v Saved 46 Tree to Remain - l 7006 Bur Oak Saved 31 -) - --- ---�-- 7024 Bur Oak Saved 32 7030 Bur Oak Saved 27 ® Tree to be Removed -7 7031 Bur Oak Saved 26 7045 Boxelder Saved 27 X / ® Tree Protection Detail 7 7046 Ame can Elm Sa ed 1z Tree t0 be Removed due / 7047 American Elm Saved 21 ( X - t0 Park Board Trail --7048 Eastem Red Cedar. Saved 20 / 861.1 - _... ----- _ ./ 7049 Boxelder Saved 24 X 7050 Boxelder Saved 26 x X Multi -Trunked \859.3 7051 ? Boxelder Saved 22 X � 7052 § Boxelder Saved 16 y' y\5 7084 1 American Elm Saved 12 D D18eased or Dying Orange Mesh Construction 7085 Black Willow Save 21 X -_ _ a / Fence Location as shown 7086 American Elm Saved 21 X on plan 7094 Green/White Ash } rX �1 7176 Eastern Red Cedar ^P 859.4 ' 7177 astern Red Cedar �S('•* / � ,� / r 7178 Boxelder •`�, ``/ ---,cam _ 7179 Boxelder X 859.9 / /J 7180 Boxelder --7181 Boxelder MATCH LINE - 7182 Boxelder a97 A7 A - X 7183 Boxelder -x Total Trees (Cal. In.) _ Total Cal. In. Removed Total Cal. In. Saved a a a las r MATCH LINE a a m Saved 16 _Saved 15 - f Saved 17 Smed 19 X Saved 16 X Saved 18 X Saved 16 Saved 20 X Saved 12 _J 590 0 590 Tree Preservation Data - Medium Density Residential Gross Site Area Net Site Area (less wetland & steep slopes) Gross Canopy Cover Net Canopy (less wetlands & steep slopes) Baseline Canopy Cover (5.4 Ac / 30.87 Ac = 17.5%) Required Canopy (207.) (30.87 X .20 = 6.2 Ac.) Canopy Needed (6.2 Ac - 5.4 Ac = 0.8 Ac.) Canopy Removed (1.01 Ac. to grading limit line) Replacement Required (0.8 Ac. X 1.2 Ac. = 0.96 Ac. Canopy Needed Above Existing Canopy) (1.01 Ac X 1.2 Ac = 1.21 Ac. Canopy Removed) Total Replacement Required (0.96 Ac. + 1.21 Ac. = 2.17 Ac.) Required Trees (2.17 Ac. x 43,560 SF = 94,525 SF / 1089) Landscape Trees Provided Prepared for. Mr - TOWN T©WN & COUNTRY HOMES 36.01 +/- Ac. 30.87 Ac. 7.4 Ac. 5.4 Ac. 17.5% 6.2 Ac. 0.8 Ac. 1.01 Ac. 0.96 Ac. 1.21 Ac. 2.17 Ac. 87 Trees 260 Trees ffieVat1011 Stake every 6' maximum. ax. - Post or Equal ige Construction ;e Staked Every 6' ;ilt Fence Liberty at Creek Side OtaII1umn, Minnesota 1. Pruning will be done by professionals during appropriate pruning season. 2.No storage of materials, operation of machinery, or development of any sort will occur within the fence-Ilne without approval in writing from the City. 3. Site grading to be done only after protective measures have been taken, city has approved fencing locations, and all contractors have been briefed on tree preservation techniques. 3. Tree removals off site are not included in the tree preservation data. Trees removed for trail requested by Park Board is not included in tree preservation data. X • 0' 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-2 20021071TPP01.DWG Date: 06/17/05 stleft 7 of 10 Tree Inventory Plan yi 'M � • uu¢ - ur+s acv. _ _ all c2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Note: Silt fence per MNDOT specifications, source 2000, machine sliced woven monofilament, 36°wide fastened steel T -Pasts with 3(5016) tens strength plastic zip ties per T -Post. (Machine sliced) 6mL gr,� Jn9 EROSION CONTROL FENCE — TYPE 1 T Posts 24' in ground Res Mo. Depth of sit fou wsbednwnL Note: Type 2 silt fence is the same as type I with hay bales installed as per detail. Type 2 to be used to protect all wetlands. Her or Straw 96ee S - is wYW04i tl,eTWI5b2tl Fb IM p,M N,. Zip Ties •t Y Y YE.a „sre„WI, Ytl.11 EROSION CONTROL FENCE — TYPE 2 CITY OF SILT CBAWBASSEB FENCE REVISED: 2-97, 1-02, 1-ei. 1-0 DATEPUTE NO.: CnM FIE NAME:3932-97_5300 5300 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT FILTER FABRIC ' / 5/40y 6" MINIMUM DEPTH 1s1" — 2" WASHED ROCK 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE NOTE: FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. ROCK MA�BASSEB C ENNTRANCE STRUCTION IEVISED: 1-98 DATE: PTE NO.: 11E NAME 393-5301 -97 5301 NOTE Silt fence per MNDOT specifications, source 200, machine sliced woven monofilament, 36" wide fastened to steel T—Posts with 3(501b) tensile strength plastic zip ties per T—Post.(machine sliced) RUNOFF FILTERED WATER SECTION AA CITY OF OFF ROAD CB CBABBASSEN FILTER BARRIER ReASMA-04 DATE: 2-01 PI -ATE Na: 53G2 nu: NAME393_5302 %i:� � �• .y , � y .nom G' � \ 1 . • . • / ,'�o 1 SLOPE VARIES BOUL 3.0% SLOPE 2.0% o o � 1-1/2" — MnDOT 2350 LVWE35030B WEAR COURSE MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" — Mri 2350 LVNW350308 BASE COURSE 12" — CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED STONE 24" MnDOT 3149.28 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW COMPACTED SUBGRADE TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION (20' BACK TO BACK) 6" I hereby certify that this plan win prepared by me m under my 10.00' ROLLS OF SOD BACK OF CURB (TYP) 1-1/2" Mri SPEC. 2350 LVWE35030B WEAR COURSE MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" MnDOT SPEC. 2350 LVNW350308 BASE COURSE 6" MnDOT SPEC. 2211 CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE BASE 24" MnDOT SPEC. 3149.26 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW COMPACTED SUBGRADE I eapervieion and that I am a duly 11cere ed PROP1146IONAL -"` Westwood Professional Services, Inc. »tet law, of the �tn�ata. 02/03/06 ReWatons Per city Comments 04/06/06 Plan Change (WRW) 7599 Anagram Drive lll/ /.G%y✓/ 07/11/06 Site Layout Change (wRw) Eden Prairie, MN 55344 -L p$ Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952-937.5822 Date 07/11/06 License No. 4M PL 10' IMMMA vi 6"-3A32 CONCRETE 4" CLASS 5 COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE WALKWAY 1' �—DRA!NAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 0 O 0 O SEE PLAN VIEW FOR SPECIFIC SIDE FOR SIDEWALK 1 1/2 3 STAPLES MATS/BLANKETS SHOULD BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY DOWNSLOPE r ry/ r rr r r r r MIN. 4" r 0 LAP r r r r r r / Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 .i r r Z Z Z_ Z r \ > > J M 12"\ r O I O OI JI O JI JJ r iTN I I FILiE AgpNE W -R 4' p y r \\ SaJRCE OF DIRECTION�ON LOT r 2:1 SLOPE r ' TYPICAL SLOPE '• SOIL STABILIZATION NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ISOMETRIC VIEW FILTER FABRIC UNDER TYPICAL TREATMENT NOTE: WET SLOPE LINING 1. SLOPE SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, CLODS, STICKS AND GRASS. MATS/BLANKETS SHALL HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT ON BLAH ETS RCDIIENSTAPLE 2. LAY BLANKETS LOOSELY AND STAKE OR FRFATSREIINS TO MAINTAIN DIRECT CONTACT WITHMATH$LASE THE SOIL. DO NOT STRETCHNSTALLATIGN Prepared for.ffil TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES 1 `x`1�lwnrn ecanprm J STREET PROFILE _ _ _ _ _ _ 0.5' — — 0.5' DIRECTION OF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE/STREET C, D, E SECTION (24' BACK TO BACK) SLOPE VARIES 12.00' .OPE VARIES _ R011S OF SOD BACK OF CURB (TYP) SLOPE VARIES 1-1/2" MnDOT SPEC. 2350 LVWE35030B WEAR COURSE MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" Mri SPEC. 2.350 LVNW35030B BASE COURSE 6" MnDOT SPEC. 2211 CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE BASE 24" Mri SPEC. 3149.28 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side Chanhaeeenr M1IlIIe80ta LOT BENCHING C-2 20021071DTP01.DWG Date: 06/17/05 Sheet 9 OF 10 Preliminary Grading Details i - U U f a 00 ID 0 0 N n d' m. N 0 ca n o_ N 0 0 N 3 a / 0 N N / o 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. ELEV 90 PVI STA = 32+00 PVI Pl FV = RQR Q.r% 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 PVI STA = 6+90 PVI ELEV = 909.63 o to A.D. _ -1.00 + 't K=90.33 N 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 PRIVATE STREET C W Westwood Profeslonal Services, Inc 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-931-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE 148&937-5150 WBStwood www.westwoodps.com 10+00 STREET A H.P. ELEV = 888.53 H.P. STA = 50+17.15 PVI STA = 50+20 PVI ELEV = 888.73 A.D. _ -2.00 K = 20.00 DATUM EL 875.00 I hams, mtlfy the " plea ,r. I q I by = m o>da my Hevidow dhmct wq,avWae mod that I we a duty 0mad PAOMMONAL ffiQ@1y //l]e h of ihu afiauaeoK 02/03/06 Ro"'eonm Par City Comments 04/06/06Plan CAongs (MRVCbrisMoehrL PS Data 04/06/06 I.iomae Na 40853 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 PRIVATE STREET D rn to n 00 00 I w DATUM ELEi 875.00 60+00 61+00 62+00 PRIVATE STREET E 4TUM ELEV 860.00 DATUM ELEV Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 PVI STA = 22+86.24 PVI ELEV = 891.69 ELEV A.D. _ -2.01 A.D. _ K = 19.91 K = 30.00 PVI STA = 23+26.24 PVI ELEV = 889.69 � � A.D. - 2.00 VC K 1= 20.00 rnN �^ 40' VC r- o M rill 40' VC M N 00 t0 O 00 t0 00 00 O) + 00 O N 00 00 N II °D + 0�0 04 II >IIOL 73 C II II W M N II > W 5 HW o_ 5 880.00 STA = 11+91.67 PVI ELEV = 897.50 PVI A.D. _ -4.00 PVI K = 30.00 = 875.00 120' VC tnC4 N^ � � NN VC rn^ M + rnN �^ �0) r- o M rill . M 00 0) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 PVI STA = 11+91.67 PVI ELEV = 897.50 PVI A.D. _ -4.00 PVI K = 30.00 = 875.00 120' VC 7.60 K = 38.16 � � o M VC M + rn 00 II r- o M rill . M STREET B PVI STA = 14+84.53 PVI ELEV = 877.00 A.D. = 6.40 K = 37.50 L.P. ELEV = 875.80 L.P. STA = 16+95.75 PVI STA = 18+17.86 PVI ELEV = 875.00 A.D. = 7.60 K = 38.16 290' VC 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION mi TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES STREET F Liberty at Creek Side Chwihmem, Minnesota I m LO N Uj CO CO + 00 rn II 5 W J D- w C-2 20021071DTP02.DWG Date 06/17/05 sheet 10 OF 10 Preliminary Street Profiles U (L 00 N 0 0 L; 0 O N 3 0 n U 0 N O 0 N i / 0 0 a N m 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. O�FE�Et� NEO gE JUN 1 � 20p5 CHANHASSEN P,,or' OEC for cacti Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: s TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Praire, Minnesota 55344 Contact: Kevin Clark Phone: (952) 253-0462 Fax: (952) 944-3437 Prepared by: . Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Project number: 20021071.00 Contact: Chris Moehrl, P.E. Side VICINITY MAP NOT 70 SCALE P INDEX SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 1 COVER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 5 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 7 PRELIMINARY TREE INVENTORY PLAN 8 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 9 PRELIMINARY DETAILS 10 PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES VICINITY MAP NOT 70 SCALE NO. DATE REVISION SHEETS Construction Plans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota Date: 06/17/05 Sheet: 1 of 10 (L ' C-2 20021024CVP1.D P _ Y M AHd° £ y IRN((Hry�. p PIYHBI[yp PM" Co.va ��. p6HN5�PH v'�^r �t 4'e <T R. 500 a $ nR Y p o HePO OR W PS 5 A Dove c,'. trYw HLvn o ruuxn � i4 v � i JHRA}XAV HL PD. N. �fT�. \� R P fl R e 8 LT. . uLn t—ITI 4 L YMAN BLVD ^y zeltin! Lak -� eiPHLr L1. z� N QP 1p aN� o CIR � Alpeo0 A Y �h ' '4 K aP9 y9 y:C H t, aR 'R NO. DATE REVISION SHEETS Construction Plans for Preliminary Plat Submittal for Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota Date: 06/17/05 Sheet: 1 of 10 (L ' C-2 20021024CVP1.D c2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.- i / `r J - \ J f / /� `r LEGEND CONIFEROUS TREE (surveyed) ELECTRIC METER l r \ n line of a SE 1 f the NW 114 ��po DECIDUOUS TREE (surveyed) Q ELECTRIC MANHOLE rr)�% I I WETLAND SANITARY MANHOLE X- N3 2 ��+ ® STEEL/WOOD POST SIGN -TRAFFIC OTHER ® CATCH BASIN ' t�' < west line of the . �` , a \\\ BB 1/4 of the NW 1 eu MAIL BOX / ® STORM FLARED END SECTION N00°08 59 W 742.38 ' AIMC � ✓� MANHOLE POH / //�� G PERC TEST ID i I N00008'59"W 704.91 uw MONITORING WELL TELEPHONE BOX o � / ' ( / e� 64 GATE VALVE © CABLE TV BOX I& HYDRANT 1 1•Y! -TRACT B I O I GAS METER QQ WELL / STREET LITE =PXH— POWER OVERHEAD Y. I \ -- GUY WIRE r0' POWER POLE w— DECIDUOUS TREE LINE a ELECTRIC BOX 0 Denotes Set Iron Monument ��_� � _ __`_� � / � _.,, tl � \ \ \ • Denotes Found Iron Monument Denotes Cost Iron Monument 9 VICINITY MAP — , Cj I it ( � � 40' Bluff Creek Over.'.ay Distrvct/� \ \ Building Setback •tgp:J \ '\ \ i ine \ Pr/mar Bluff reek Overlay Distrct Line / 00 o _/_ •/ , ' 1`'`, / -_— J !, rN00°26'1.5"W 3 , ' f �L.LCU -_ The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23 (referred to herein as Tract A). ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest comer of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Section line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest corner of said Section and place of beginning. Being a three -cornered piece in Southwest corner of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23. ALSO: Beginning at the southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116 North of Range 23 West; thence south along the quarter -quarter section line distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14; thence east along the north line of said Carver County Rood No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the aforementioned quarter -quarter section 827 feet to a point 26 feet north of the east -west quarter -quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26; thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter -quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of I I beginning (referred to herein as Tract B.) EXCEPT.• that part of Tract A which lies Easterly of Line 1 described below: Line 1. Commencing at the north quarter corner of said Section 26; thence run west an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section for 1634.23 feet to ' the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described, thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 I minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 478.28 feet; thence on on azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there 1 terminating; ' and EXCEPT that part of Tract B which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of Line 2 I described below. Line 2: Commencing at the point of termination of Line I described above; thence run east on a azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 seconds along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of said section for 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds for 448.73 feet; thence • ' © ` on an azimuth of 200 N de rees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 feet; thence on on azimuth of 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet; thence on an azimuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there Together with right of access retained in Quit Claim Deed Document No. 310751 pursuant to ` ' ` Access Driveway Permit dated 8-26-2002. terminating. 75 Toto/ Site Area: 36.01 acres Ld cu Ix IL 1 hereby artuy that tbla plan was prepared by m< er undo my Fevldmm Caste Prepared for . Westwood Professional Services, Inc. d �e lots of the State bft nt 7599 Anagram Drive TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES SRS Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Edward J. Hasek DOWN , Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952.937-5822 Date: 6/17/05 iamb Nn 16454 Ratmd 1DMft by/daft--�-,J P`� . Liberty at Creek Side C11a3:111888en, Minne80ta 0' 100' 200' 300 C-2 20021071EXPOI.DWG Date 6/17/05 sheet 2 of 10 Existing Conditions/ Survey e 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 0 N 0 Atm_ Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax:952-937-SS22 I hereby certify fast this plat was prepared by me as under my direct supervision and fast I are a dnly licensed UND WRV81oa under the ams of the sh" of bllnnerats. ICraig W. Morse Dam 6/17/05 u00" x0. 23021 cMW. checked: cWM Draw= SRS Rftwd Dnwing by/date Prepared for. MEE TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES Data Total Site Area Existing Zoning Residential Medium Existing Guide Plan R-8, Mixed Medium Proposed Zoning 138 units Total Premier Townhomes 383 un./ac. Overall Density 0.43 acres Outlot A 0.90 acres Total Existing Wetlands 2.77 acres Total Wetland Mit Area 1.47 acres 30.87 acres Total 30% Slopes Net Developable Area 6� Net Density Total Impervious Area 8.96 ac. (299 of Net) -- et)355 Street, Roadways and Drives / q),. LocalPublic Street ROW Public Street — 60 ft. ROW Private Street Private Drives Building Setbacks (minimums) Public ROW Private Street Private Drive Abutting Property Wetland Buffer Building to Building M/nimum Driveway Length Premier NOTE: 1. The lot dimensions and areas on this plan are approximate. Refer to the Final Plat and supporting data for exact lot dimensions and areas. 36.O1t ac. A-2, Agricultural Preservation Residential Medium Density (4-8 u/a) R-8, Mixed Medium Density Res. (<8 u/a) 138 units 383 un./ac. 0.43 acres 0.90 acres 2.77 acres 1.47 acres 30.87 acres 'a� V� 4.47 un./ac. 8.96 ac. (299 of Net) -- et)355 J. 55ac. 32 ft. B—B 32 ft. B—B 25 ft. B—B 25 ft. w/walk & 15 ft. w/out walk 25 ft to back of curb 20 ft. to back of curb L /A 50 ft. vk 1 40 ft. % L15' 0�} 20 ft. 20 ft. (to curb or walk) 2. All setbacks measured excluding stoops, patios, porches or decks. DBVBLOPB&-- Town and Country Homes 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: (952) 253-0462 Fax. (952) 944-3437 Contact: Kevin Clark Legend MEN Concrete Curb & Gutter Concrete Sidewalk 10. Jo oo i PLANNBR/SNGINBBRNMVBYOR Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 Phone: (952) 937-5150 Fax: (952) 937-5822 Contact: Chris Moehrl Typical Lot 5 jk � p 41 — — N I — � m Liberty at Creek Side Minnesota ).0' 0' 100' 200' 300' C-2 Date: 6/17/05 Preliminary Plat 20021071PPFOi.DWG Sheet 3 OF 10 m 3 a 0 4. CL n 0 N 0 0 N 0) 3 a rl n 0 N 0 0 N 11 Sl t - a N 0 M W u1 0 0 N m 75 3 0J 0 tis ca L-9 r 0 N 0 0 N m 3 a 0 N 0 0 N / m 2005 lona S es 1 \ � l X -Y = __X x \ BL C 0 \ DI T BLUFF REQ 04RL-kY DISTRICT GRX'DIN�G LIM T LININT BLUFF CREW OVERLAY / DISTFICT SETBACK 5' CONCRETE / SIDEWALK `(TYP_)r / Q ROCK CONSTRUCTION GARAGE GRADE (TYP FINISH GRADE AT BACK ° O-.F�, BUILDING (TYP}-,,_ t1` l WATER LINt\ AT / C EEK (TTP) \ 100' BLUFF CREEK SETBACK LINE\ \ OM CENTERLINE OF CREEK (TLP) \ PROPO 40' WETLAND \ BUFFER SETBAC TYP)-� ; \ PROPOSED 16.5' WETLAN \ _97p,_,BUFIFER UNE (T)YP) \ HEAVY DUTY (YP \ \ CC\ � tee- Ile 11-01 '940 \ v E \ �s I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my tRevitdo= . Westwood Professional Services Inc. udirednder the lam and that [ f i duly licensed LAND SURVEYOR Services, undo the laws of the Stets of Minnesota 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 ChAs Mt ski, pg Phone: 952.937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Data 06/17/05 LtmNo, 40853 INING WALL BY OTHERS 0 Qdop'046 ewe C 1 mea: CRIMI Prepared for. Chedwd: CRM Draws And Reooed Dawbtgbv/date: r SPO D A\� ME) TOWN &COUNTRY HOMES Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: • ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN—PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON—SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. • ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. • PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST & BE USED AS TEMPORARY PONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. PERFERATED OUTLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED. • THE SITE MUST BE STABALIZED WITH A 50B SEED MIX At TYPE I MULCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE PLACED AROUND THEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT. • THE SITE SHALL BE STABALIZED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF FINAL GRADE COMPLETION. • ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TO RESTORE TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION. • ALL EXPOSED SOILS NOT TO BE GRADED FOR: 7 DAYS (Z 3:1 SLOPES), 14 DAYS (10:1 TO 3:1), OR 21 DAYS (10:1 OR FLATTER) SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED. GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: • ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD—VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. • ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES. • POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. • ALL RETAINING WALLS TO BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCMA STANDARDS • TOPSOIL RESPREAD SHALL BE 0.5' ON PADS AND 0.5' ON OTHER GREEN AREAS. • DRIVEWAY GRADES ARE TAKEN TO THE CURB & GUTTER OF PUBLIC STREETS WHERE THERE IS NO SIDEWALK. DENOTES SOIL BORING 1, DENOTES SILT FENCE 0 rm = M DENOTES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE ----980 DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS --980 DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS \ �s I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my tRevitdo= . Westwood Professional Services Inc. udirednder the lam and that [ f i duly licensed LAND SURVEYOR Services, undo the laws of the Stets of Minnesota 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 ChAs Mt ski, pg Phone: 952.937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Data 06/17/05 LtmNo, 40853 INING WALL BY OTHERS 0 Qdop'046 ewe C 1 mea: CRIMI Prepared for. Chedwd: CRM Draws And Reooed Dawbtgbv/date: r SPO D A\� ME) TOWN &COUNTRY HOMES Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: • ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN—PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON—SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. • ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. • PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST & BE USED AS TEMPORARY PONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. PERFERATED OUTLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED. • THE SITE MUST BE STABALIZED WITH A 50B SEED MIX At TYPE I MULCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE PLACED AROUND THEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT. • THE SITE SHALL BE STABALIZED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF FINAL GRADE COMPLETION. • ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TO RESTORE TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION. • ALL EXPOSED SOILS NOT TO BE GRADED FOR: 7 DAYS (Z 3:1 SLOPES), 14 DAYS (10:1 TO 3:1), OR 21 DAYS (10:1 OR FLATTER) SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED. GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: • ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD—VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. • ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES. • POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. • ALL RETAINING WALLS TO BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCMA STANDARDS • TOPSOIL RESPREAD SHALL BE 0.5' ON PADS AND 0.5' ON OTHER GREEN AREAS. • DRIVEWAY GRADES ARE TAKEN TO THE CURB & GUTTER OF PUBLIC STREETS WHERE THERE IS NO SIDEWALK. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota 0' 100' 200' 300' C-2 20021071GDPOI.DWG Date. 06/17/05 sheet 5 of 10 Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan DENOTES SOIL BORING T _U= DENOTES SILT FENCE 0 rm = M DENOTES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE ----980 DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS --980 DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS a— DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER ---►►� DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING TREE LINE mow, DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE REMOVAL LIMITS x 856.3 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION x6630 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION E.O.F. DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION DENOTES EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (MNDOT 3885, CATAGORY 3, WOOD FIBER 2S.) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota 0' 100' 200' 300' C-2 20021071GDPOI.DWG Date. 06/17/05 sheet 5 of 10 Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan H Q U o 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. v Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5922 int misdirected branches ,aders Intact r depth of specified mulch over Its - do not pile against trunk plant pit with specified backfill soil sides and bottom of hole o American Standard for Nursery Stock durum ball size. i" deep watering basin __.._.yt boll on undisturbed subsoil or compacted soil mound matching trees natural groundline with finished site grade I hereby eerdfy that this plan tells prop" by ree m under my sedAaD.SCAM AdRCflarWuerdSte ftawI om•e dhulytelon fAfinnao Edw J. Hasek Date 06/17/05 1itcwm No. 16454 out misdirected branches leaders Intact and staking is optional of stakes 5' above ground (max,) or to first branch. sin of stake 3' (min.) below ground Ing posts to be 2"X2" Stained wood or painted delineator posts. > 3 posts equidistant around and outside root ball. re tree to posts with 16" Zang polypropylene or ethylene, 40 mil, 1 1/2" wide strop. wrapping is called for. wrap from aline upward to first branches 4" depth of specified mulch over pits - do not pile against trunk II plant pit with specified backfill soil V sides and bottom of hole to American Standard for Nursery Stock Inimum ball size. 3" deep watering basin wot ball on undisturbetl subsoil or compacted soil mound matching trees natural groundline with finished site grade Dedaaad: PKW Draws: IWH Record Diamd" bby/datw Planting Notes Contractor shall provide one year guarantee of all plant materials. The guarantee begins on the date of the Landscape Architect's or Owner's written acceptance of the initial planting. Replacement plant materials shall also have a one year guarantee commencing upon planting. All plants to be specimen grade, Minnesota -grown and/or hardy. Specimen grade shall adhere to, but is not limited by, the following standards: All plants shall be free from disease, pests, wounds, scars, etc. All plants shall be free from noticeable gaps, holes, or deformities. All plants shall be free from broken or dead branches. All plants shall have heavy, healthy branching and leafing. Coniferous trees shall have an established main leader and a height to width ratio of no less than 5:3. Plants to meet American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI 60.1-1990) requirements for size and type specified. Plants to be installed as per standard ANSI planting practices. Use minimum 12" loam planting soil on trees and 6" on shrubs (sides and bottom of hole). Backfill soil to be existing top soil from site free of roots, rocks larger than one inch, subsoil debris, and large weeds. Contractor shall verify locations with all utilities prior to installation of plants. Staking of trees optional; reposition, plumb and stake if not plumb after one year. Wrap all smooth -barked trees - fasten top and bottom. Remove by April 1. Open top of burlap on BB materials; remove pot on potted plants; split and break apart peat pots. Prune plants as necessary - per standard nursery practice and to correct poor branching. Plants shall be immediately planted upon arrival at site. Properly heel -in materials if necessary, temporary only. All disturbed areas to be sodded unless otherwise noted: sod to be standard Minnesota grown and hardy bluegrass mix. All sod areas shall be prepared with 4" of topsoil and raked to remove debris and ensure drainage. Slopes of 3:1 or greater shall be staked. Four inches of shredded hardwood bark mulch shall be used around all trees within turf areas. All shrub planting beds (within sodded areas) shall have weed barrier fabric, 4" of shredded bark mulch and Valley -View Black Diamond (or equal) poly edging. The edging shall be placed with smooth curves and at least 3' from the centers of evergreen trees. Utilize curbs and sidewalks for edging where possible. Contractor shall contact Gopher State "One Call" (651-454-0002 or 800-252-1166) to verify locations of all underground utilities. Actual location of plant material is subject to field and site conditions. No planting will be installed until all grading and construction has been completed in the immediate area. Contractor shall provide necessary watering of plant materials until the plant is fully established or irrigation system is operational. Owner will not provide water for Contractor. Provide irrigation to all planted areas on site. Irrigation will be design/build by Landscape Contractor. All information about installation and scheduling can be obtained from General Contractor. Repair, replace, or provide sod/seed as required for any roadway boulevard areas adjacent to the site disturbed during construction. Repair all damage to property from planting operations at no cost to owner. No plant material substitutions will be accepted unless approval is requested of the Landscape Architect by the Landscape Contractor prior to submission of the bid and/or quotation. Shrub Detail Prepared for.Juj�(j} :I i',i TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES container, set soil mass on ted soil mound matching shrubs groundline with finished site grade ting beds shall receive 4" of d mulch and weed barrier fabric I planting beds with specified ,here adjacent to lawn areas sides and bottom of hole plant pit with apecifietl backfill loll Plant List CODE QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME O(/V�EERRSSTTTOOjRY 180 Patmore Ash / Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore \ly Green Mountain Sugar Maple / Acer saccarum 'Green Mountain' Red Oak / Quercus alba Skyline Honeylocust / Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Skycole' Redmond Linden / Tilia americana 'Redmond' Northwood Red Maple / Acer rubrum 'Northland' Bur Oak /Quercus macrocarpa SIZE 2.5" BB 2.5" BB 2.5" BB 2.5" BB 2.5" BB 2.5" BB 2.5' BB ORNAMENTAL 54 Prairie Fire Crabapple / Malus x 'Prairie Fire' 1.5" BB Spring Snow Crabapple / Malus x 'Spring Snow 1.5" BB Cockspur Hawthorn / Crataegus crus-galli 1.5" BB ki Japanese Tree Lilac / Syringa reticulata 1.5" BB ® Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry / Amelanchier x grandifloro 'Autumn Brilliance 1.5" BB EVERGREEN 82 Black Hills Spruce/Picea glauca densato 6' BB Austrian Pine/Pinus nigra 6' BB Colorado Green Spruce / Picea pungens 6' BB Scotch Pine / Pinus sylvestris 6' BB Techny Arborvitae / Thuja occidentalis 'Techny' 6' BB SHRUBS 74 Isanti Dogwood / Cornus stolonifero 'Isanti 36" Pot Red Twigged Dogwood / Cornus sericea baileyi 36" Pot Nannyberry Viburnum / Viburnum lentago 36" Pot 0 Compact American Cranberrybush Viburnum / Viburnum trilobum 'Compacta 24" Pot Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla lonicero 24" Pot Dwarf Winged Euonymus / Euonymus alatus 'Compactus' 24" Pot 24" Pot NOTES: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. PLANT SYMBOLS ARE DRAWN AT 75% MATURITY *24% of Evergreen Trees are 6' Tall *17% of Evergreen Trees are 8' Tall #1 Buffer Requirements (15' Buffer) Medium Density Adjacent to Road Buffer Yard Requirement "B" (City Ordinance) 2.0 Canopy Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 4.0 Understory / Ornamental Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 6.0 Shrubs per 100' LF of Buffer Trees Required 707.31 LF / 100 LF = 7.07 7.07 x 2.0 = 14.14 Overstory Trees 7.07 x 4.0 = 28.28 Understory / Ornamental Trees 7.07 x 6.0 = 42.42 Shrubs Trees Provided 14 Overstory/8' Evergreen Trees 28 Understory/Ornamental/6' EvergreenTrees 42 Shrubs #2 Buffer Requirements (30' Buffer) Medium Density Adjacent to Road Buffer Yard Requirement "B" (City Ordinance) 0.8 Canopy Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 1.6 Understory / Ornamental Trees per 100' LF of Buffer 2.4 Shrubs per 100' LF of Buffer Trees Required 494.66 LF / 100 LF = 4.95 4.95 x 0.8 = 3.96 Overstory Trees 4.95 x 1.6 = 7.92 Understory / Ornamental Trees 4.95 x 2.4 = 11.88 Shrubs Trees Provided 13 Overstory/8' Evergreen Trees 21 Understory/Ornamental/6' Evergreen Trees 32 Shrubs 0' 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creekside 1V1�IlIte8at8 X -XX 20021071PLP01.DWG Date: 06/17/05 sheet 6 of 10 Preliminary Landscape Plan I- ca U X IL ON 0 0 0 rn 0 0 Cu rn 3 0 a- t- 1" 0 cu O O Cu m 3 a n 0 ru 0 0 1U / aii ubu.c X �l l X 868.9 X 860.2 / I ( X 859.3 \ 30.E I 11 I ,4 Tree List ID# Species Saved/Removed Col. In. Notes 3294 E Sugar Maple - -Sav�i 8 7161 7182 7001 I American Elm Saeed 1 12 Bur Oak Saved 7002 ` American Elm Saved 12 13 7003 Black Willow Saved 12 X 7004 Cottonwood Saved 15 X 7005 Bur Oak Saved 46 X 7006 Bur Oak Saved 31 X 7007 American Elm Saved 20 7010 Boxelder Saved 13 I 7174 7011 White Oak Saved 15 _ _ _ Sugar Maple g --_ p-- Saved Eastern Red Cedar Saved 7012 Aspen Saved 22 X 7013 American Elm Saved 15 X 7014 1 American Elm Saved 13 7095 7015American Elm Saved 12 7096 7016 Boxelder Saved 15 7097 7098 7017 Boxelder Saved j 15 Boxelder 7018 I Hackberry Saved x_14 Boxelder 7019 Boxelder Saved j 19 Green/White Ash 7020 Bur Oak Saved 26 Boxelder 7021 American Elm Saved 16 Boxelder 7022 Bur Oak Saved 35 Boxelder 7023 Bur Oak _ Saved j 32 Boxelder 7024 Bur Oak Saved 32- Boxelder 7026 American Elm Saved 12 Boxelder 7027_ Boxelder Saved 14 7108 7028 j American Elm Saved 12 x7109 7029 7030 Bur Oak Bur Oak Saved Saved 25 27 7110 7031 Bur Oak _ Saved I 26 7111 7032 Boxelder Saved 12 7112 7033 American Elm Saved 12 7113 7034 Boxelder Saved 13 i 7114 7035 American Elm Saved 12 7115 7036 Boxelder Saved 14 I 7116 7037 Boxelder Saved 13 7117 7040 Bur Oak Saved 28 7118 7041 Bur Oak 13 17 7119 7042 Bur Oak _Saved Saved 26 7120 7043 Bur Oak Saved 28 7121 7044 Bur Oak Saved 34 7123 7045 Boxelder Saved 27 X 046m Elm Saved 12 7125 7047 American Elm Saved 21 7126 7048 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 20 7127 7049 Boxelder Saved 24 X 7050 Boxelder Saved 26 X 7051 Boxelder Saved 22 X 7052 Boxelder Saved Boxelder Saved 7055 Boxelder Saved 13 Saved 7056 Boxelder Saved 14 Removed 7057 Boxelder 7058-Boxelder Sated Saved 22 18 X X 7059 Boxelder Saved 12 Boxelder 7060 Boxelder Saved I 13 Removed 706T-1 Boxelder Saved 13 12 14 21 7062 I Bur Oak Saved 43 Saved 7063 American Elm Saved 12 Saved 7064 American Elm Saved 13 Saved 7065 American Elm Saved_ 12 Saved 7066 Boxelder Saved_ I 16 X 7067 Boxelder Saved -�- 12 Saved 7068 Boxelder Saved 26 X 7069 American Elm Saved , American Elm X 7070 Boxelder Saved _�22 - I 15 Saved 7071 Green/White Ash Saved I 12 Saved19 7072 1 Boxelder Saved 15 Saved Sated 7073 Boxelder Saved 12 Saved Saved 7074 Boxelder Sated 29 X 7075 Bur Oak Saved 488 Saved 70767076 Boxelder -x 1212 -t- -ae 7077 Boxelder 7 -7 Saeed 12 7078 Boxelder Sated X 7079 Boxelder Saved 27 7080 Boxelder Saved 1 12 7081 Boxelder Saved 12 ID# -Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes 7082 I Boxelder Saved 14 7161 7182 7083 Boxelder Saved 12 Bur Oak Saved 784 American Elm Saved 12 13 7085 Black Willow Saved 45 X 7086 American Elm Saved 21 X 7087 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7088 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7089 Bur Oak Saved 25 7090 Boxelder Saved 13 I 7174 7091 Boxelder Saved 16 _ _ _ Sugar Maple g --_ p-- Saved Eastern Red Cedar Saved 7092 Boxelder Saved 18 X 7093 1 Black Willow Saved 31 X 7094 Green/White Ash Saved 16 X 7095 Bur Oak Saved 40 7161 7096 Bur Oak Saved 39 Boxelder Saved 7097 7098 Bur Oak Bur Oak Sated 23 Saved 34 Boxelder Saved 7099 Boxelder Saved 14 7100 Boxelder _ 27 _ X 7101 Green/White Ash _Saved Saved 12 7102 Boxelder Saved 13 7103 Boxelder Saved 12 1 7104 Boxelder Saved 25 X 7105 Boxelder Saved 26 X 7106 Boxelder _ Removed 33 X 7107 Boxelder Removed 37 X 7108 Boxelder Removed 22 x7109 Bur Oak Removed 18 7110 Boxelder Removed 18 7111 Boxelder Removed 13 7112 American Elm Removed 12 X 7113 American Elm Removed 16 i 7114 American Elm Removed 19 X 7115 Boxelder Removed 21 I 7116 American Elm Removed 14 7117 American Elm Removed 15 7118 Green/White Ash Removed 13 7119 American Elm Removed 15 D 7120 Boxelder Removed 15 7121 Boxelder Removed 18 X 7123 Boxelder Saved 13 7124 I Bur Oak Saved 20 7125 Bur Oak Saved 21 7126 Boxelder Saved 16 7127 _ Boxelder Saved 12 7128 Boxelder 7129 Boxelder Saved Saved 13 12 7130 I Boxelder 7131 Boxelder Saved Saved 17 14 7132 Boxelder Saved 19 7133 Boxelder Saved 16 7134 Boxelder Saved 15 7135 Boxelder Removed 14 7136 Boxelder Removed 36 7137 Boxelder Removed 12 7138 1 Boxelder Removed 15 7139 I- _Boxelder 7140 1 American Elm 7141 American Elm Removed Saved Removed 12 14 21 7142 Bur Oak Saved 31 7143 Bur Oak Saved 30 _ 7144 Cottonwood Saved 30 7147 Black Willow Saved 14 - 7148 Boxelder Saved 20 7149 American Elm Saved 22 7150 American Elm Saved 12 7151 , American Elm Saved 13 _ 7152 Boxelder Saved 12 7153 Boxelder Saved19 7154 7155 American Elm American Elm7155 American Elm Saved Sated 12 13 7156 7157 _Siberian Elm Siberian Elm Saved Saved 29 16 X 7158 American Elm I Removed 26 X 7159 Boxelder Saved 19 ID # -- Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes te ( 7160 Boxelder Saved 19 7161 7182 Boxelder Saved ; Boxelder Saved -- 30 12 X j 7163 1 Bur Oak Saved 27 7164 Boxelder Saved 13 7165 Boxelder Saved 21 X 7166 American Elm Saved 14 7167 American Elm Saved 18 7168 Boxelder Saved 16 _ _- 7169 7170 Bur Oak Saved Basswood Saved 32 16 - X -i 7171 Eastern Red Cedar Saved 15 7172 CottSaved-onwood -t 15 I 7174 - Eastern Red Cedar Sated 20 7175 7176 _ _ _ Sugar Maple g --_ p-- Saved Eastern Red Cedar Saved 36 15 ---� 7177 Eastern Red Cedar 17 w 7178 _Saved Boxelder Saved 19 _ X 7179 Boxelder Saved 16 X J 7180 j Boxelder Saved 18 X 7161 I Boxelder Saved 16 7182 Boxelder Saved 20 X 7183 Boxelder Saved 12 TotTotal Trees (Cal. In.) = al Cal. In. Removed 3339 q35 Total Cal. In. Saved 2904 -� I Tree Protection Detail 011111111111 Orange Mesh Construction Fence Location as shown on plan Stake every 6' maximum. 191N111171 " Post or Equal ge Construotion e Staked Every 6' Notes 1. Pruning will be done by professionals during appropriate pruning season. 2. No storage of materials, operation of machinery, or development of any sort will occur within the fence -line without approval in writing from the City. 3. Site grading to be done only after protective measures have been taken, city has approved fencing locations, and all contractors have been briefed on tree preservation techniques. �=� ' _ X X Tree Preservation Data Legend X X ` X j - -$SZ.G- - - x lY � /j 7445 20. 3 7050 7051 B. / X x X XTX X X X 9 7 ��fff 897.26 29( a9] Q� ,I 11M lex ,. 2a / l �J 858.3 X �c Tree to Remain �X 858.7 Gross Site Area 36.01 +/- Ac. X 941.0 I 71 Net Site Area 30.87 Ac. 861.4 Tree to be Removed (less wetland & steep slopes) 7.y] f 858.3 Gross Canopy Cover 6.20 Ac. MATCH LINE ,i �1 Net Canopy 4.20 Ac. 3.e �,_ (less wetlands & steep slopes) 93 Baseline Canopy Cover (4.2 Ac / 30.87 Ac) 13.6% 3.2� I 1 ~ ` Required Canopy (257.) (30.87 X .25) 7.7 Ac. J J Canopy Remaining (4.2 Ac -3.7 Ac) 3.7 Ac. • f ` Replacement Required 9.74 (15 Ac Xc1.2 Ac) 1 Ac) .6 Ac. Required Trees (90,605 SF / 1089) 24 Trees \N` v \ 7001 Landscape Trees Provided 214 Trees EA i7 MAIr O Call 48 Hours before digging: r GOPHER STATE ONE CALL I" o' 100' 200' 300' MATCH LINE Twin City Area 651-454-000271 ~ x-xx 20021071TPPOI.DWG Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 X \ � c2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7a Date: 06/17/05 ��: % OF lU I heresy certify that ede plan w.s prepared by me m under my Liberty at Westwood Professional Services Inc. ami d va: =e ul , �.,,,� Prepared for. Tree Inventory i� iii Creekside 7599 Anagram Drive Plan Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Edw J Hasek ��' Ih't-I TOWN COUNTRY HOMES Phone: 952.937-5150 Fax: 952.937-5822 Date: 06/17/05 L1on" No. 16454 Rewrd Rmmft /ttitte: Chanhassen, Minnesota F- p U f Q co V If"1 n If7 0 0 N r, O7 3 0 d F n o_ N 0 0 N CD 3 75 11 n 0 N 0 0 N 0 F- a U f Q 1( ) 0 cu N I" ID 03 3 r -i O F- F- P (a ,--I n O (U fU 0 0 (U 11 CD 3 n 0 Ou 0 cu CU i ,A m 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Note: Silt fence per MNDOT specifications, source 2000, machine sliced woven monofilament, 35'wide fastened steel T -Posts with 3(501b) tensi strength plastic zip ties per T -Post. (Machine sliced) Sino` x�ng EROSION CONTROL FENCE - TWE 1 T Posts 24" in ground ries Min. Depth of silt fence embedment. Note: Type 2 silt fence is the some as type I with hay bales installed as per detail. Type 2 to be used to protect all wetlands. Mav or Straw Seine U• ` - Tn .voa ,lie l+c..—Oe ,sm ionb .v^^e AS Zip Ties EROSION CONTROL FENCE - TYPE 2 CITY OF SILT CHANHASSEN FENCE REVISED: 2-97, 1-02, IN, 1-01I DATE: 2-97 PLATE NO, 5300 RUE NAME: 3935300 J / ?'OPPUB��C� FILTER FABRIC " 6" MINIMUM DEPTH 1" — 2" WASHED ROCK 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM ' NOTE: FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. CITY OF ROCK CHANHASSEN C ENTRANCEON REVISED: 1-9e DniE. 2-97 PLATE NO.: 5301 FILE NAME: 393_5301 D L� Silt fence per MNDOT specifications, source 200, machine sliced woven monofilament, 36" wide fastened to steel T—Posts with 3(501b) tensile strength plastic zip ties per T—Post.(machine sliced) RUNOFF filter T WI i I FILTERED WATER J SECTION AA CITY OF OFF ROAD CB CHANHASSEN FILTER BARRIER rsensEod-oa DATE: 2-01 PLATE NO.: 5302 RLE NAME:393_5302 6"-3A32 CONCRETE 4" CLASS 5 COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE WALKWAY Q p i i i iV<-aL LdV�.L-aLJ Vii\LLL i VL�r i iVi \ Q 0 ° (32' BACK TO BACK) REFER TO PLAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS & EXACT SIDEWALK LOCATION PL O� r� p��30' ROW CL 30� ROW f O � ® O � � PL 61 10' 00°� o 16' - 16' �/ 10' O/SIDEWALK 1, DRAINAGE & UTILITY DRAINAGE & UTILITY F EASEMENT EASEMENT BO EVARD BOUL, ARD 2.0%9 -SLOPE 3.0% SLOPE 2.0% SLOPE O , 0 O 0 1p 1-1/2' - MnDOT 2350 LVWE35030B WEAR COURSE SEE PLAN VIEW FOR SPECIFIC MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT SIDE FOR SIDEWALK 2" - MnDOT 2350 LVNW35030B BASE COURSE 12" - CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED STONE 24" MnDOT 3149.28 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW LL COMPACTED SUBGRADE I bereby cerWy that thb plan was prepared by me or under my . Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I hewon hStatelof Mlnnuta urro suxvRYOR RiCRM Prepared for. checked: CRM 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Chris Moehrl, PIL A1MM Phone: 952.937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Date: 06/17/05 License No, 40853 Rftwd Drawing by/date: to " STAPLES MATS/BLANKETS SHOULD BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY DOWNSLOPE ^> � y � IF U f MIN. 4' f O LAP t f P f TYPICAL SLOPE '; SOIL STABILIZATION NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ISOMETRIC VIEW UNDERFILTER FABRIC NOTE: TYPICAL TREATMENT 1. SLOPE SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, WET SLOPE LINING CLODS, STICKS AND GRASS. MATS/BLANKETS SHALL HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT OSION BLANKETS RF REINFORCEMENT 2. LAY BLANKETS LOOSELY AND STAKE OR MATS SLOPE STAPLE TO MAINTAIN DIRECT CONTACT WITH INSTALLATION THE SOIL DO NOT STRETCH TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES f 12 a + AERMP DIRT OV MAT, to z J J f ol OI f \ FlEtER pVE f \\' 4 AOF WPR f \\\ SOURCE Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 w w Z Z J J of of I I ECTIONOF FLOW ON LOT STREET PRO01LE _ _ _ _ 0.5' - — — 0.5'' DIRECTION O� F—ON STREET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Liberty at Creek Side Minnesota LOT BENCHING C-2 20021071DTP01.DWG Date: 06/17/05 Sheet: 9 OF 10 Preliminary Grading Details 0 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. DATUM ELEV 860.00 1+00 DATUM ELEV 880.00 U3O M 00 0 o Oa o p c Lp� 20+00 PVI STA = 3+00 PVI ELEV = 879.60 ELEV r- A.D. = 0.35 000 W = 1.85 K = 289.66 � u, K = 100' VC 00 tD OD ao M W o to 0 N 0)C to N00 Co Lo + oi ^ ^ � II ro 00 > o W II a- II > L 00 J W 0No 't + W N W Sled MN --!IcZ) -I"" rin H.P. ELEV = 885.64 L.P. ELEV = 883.27 H.P. STA = 14+49.56 L.P. STA = 18+51.55 STA = 11+85 PVI STA 14+50 PVI STA = 18+99.80 PVI L.P. ELEV = 877.93 H.P. ELEV = 879.26 L.P. ELEV = 877.55 P ELEV = 11+85 PVI ELEV = 885.80 PVI ELEV = 882.87 H.P. STA = 6+98.65 L.P. STA = 9+14.39 A.D. _ -1.29 A.D. = 3.65 L.P. STA = 5+08.85 PVI STA = 7+00 PVI STA = 9+50 A.D. _ -1.81 K = 77.44 PVI STA = 5+10 K = 55.29 K = 41.06 PVI ELEV = 877.70 PVI ELEV = 879.50 PVI ELEV = 877.00 A.D. _ -1.95 A.D. = 3.81 100' VC 150' VC A.D. = 1.85 100' VC K=53.99 K=51.35 K=39.39 00 100 VC Co 100' VC 150' VC to o ro ^ LO r o 0 a M 04 + N 00 M Co 00 �0�0 N M ^ _ Do N N coo r- Co a+i � o 0 0 0 to N ± 00 II II II II II, 00 00 II 0 o Ln a; Lo a; o^ II U> w 5 w II II > + 00 + �^ c+o Go n a^o ^ ^ + ^ II II S W > o o � i > w o °° > W a W > J 5 It W CD W V 0 - II II II II Ci II II II p a w - a w a w a w W w a a W 1 0% 0.64 e e W - .65� 0% 1 00-��_ r g1% 5+00 6+00 PVI STA = 24+32.50 n PVI ELEV r- r0 COD 00 000 W = 1.85 co^ � u, K = Oo Co 00 tD OD ao ODM W o to LO 00 OJT 0)C W00 2+00 3+00 4+00 H.P. ELEV = 885.64 L.P. ELEV = 883.27 H.P. STA = 14+49.56 L.P. STA = 18+51.55 STA = 11+85 PVI STA 14+50 PVI STA = 18+99.80 PVI L.P. ELEV = 877.93 H.P. ELEV = 879.26 L.P. ELEV = 877.55 P ELEV = 11+85 PVI ELEV = 885.80 PVI ELEV = 882.87 H.P. STA = 6+98.65 L.P. STA = 9+14.39 A.D. _ -1.29 A.D. = 3.65 L.P. STA = 5+08.85 PVI STA = 7+00 PVI STA = 9+50 A.D. _ -1.81 K = 77.44 PVI STA = 5+10 K = 55.29 K = 41.06 PVI ELEV = 877.70 PVI ELEV = 879.50 PVI ELEV = 877.00 A.D. _ -1.95 A.D. = 3.81 100' VC 150' VC A.D. = 1.85 100' VC K=53.99 K=51.35 K=39.39 00 100 VC Co 100' VC 150' VC to o ro ^ LO r o 0 a M 04 + N 00 M Co 00 �0�0 N M ^ _ Do N N coo r- Co a+i � o 0 0 0 to N ± 00 II II II II II, 00 00 II 0 o Ln a; Lo a; o^ II U> w 5 w II II > + 00 + �^ c+o Go n a^o ^ ^ + ^ II II S W > o o � i > w o °° > W a W > J 5 It W CD W V 0 - II II II II Ci II II II p a w - a w a w a w W w a a W 1 0% 0.64 e e W - .65� 0% 1 00-��_ r g1% 5+00 6+00 PVI STA = 24+32.50 Ccu U PVI ELEV = 887.03 r0 mp A.D. = 1.85 a.0 �06 u, K = 54.10 pNi lD Q�0D tD 100' VC pN0 ODM W o to LO 00 OJT 0)C W00 N Of 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 O ^ � M ao LO toN 0 N II L 00 II W 0No 't + W N 00 w N II CL ^00 II II II ^^ 5 J Q J M� r ^ o Wr� 10D M M p�'t oto 00M oto Oto Wto p�� 00 U3� o^ p,M Ccu U 00 o� �� n r0 mp co oM a.0 �06 u, Ln aNM �� pNi lD Q�0D tD L6 ONi pN0 ODM W C0 OJ00 W 00 OJT 0)C W00 0300 co 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 �1IRM:o :I a I hereby certify flat thla plan was prepoxd by me m wader my Revidenc . directmperelalan and that I f l • defy licensed LAND OfJRVHYOR Westwood Professional Services, Inc. or=der der &e Tawe of the state of dinnaota 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Chris Moehrb Pg Phone: 952.937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5622 Date 06/17/05 uaeoee Na 40853 00' V PVI STA = 3+25 V1 ELEV = 85.0f A.D =-.36 K 1= 277 78 �D10 = 908.85 00 o 00 N 00 O T) 00 to 0^ ^ �a0 � N tD d' t0 N� N ,�� ^ rLo N00 fid' f0 `� ^ � Ito r- coN 00 r'0 t!)ODto^0 N^ SON N^N ^ ^00 ^ ^lD ^^ n^ ^ r,00 M� r ^ �� N OD 10D M M p�'t oto 00M oto Oto Wto p�� 00 pi d' pi � t>o Itn M MM NM tZ r7 of 00 CO M W OD W ^ CO 00 ^ Oo CO a0 OJ ^ 0o CO ao W 00 W 00 ao to p3 ao OD W t>0 Oo W m CO M OD OD 00 W M OD W 00 00 0D M 00 (0 M 00 M 00 m OD OD CO 0o 00 W 00 00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 STREET A '-:.P. ELEV = 908.85 H.P. STA = 33+99.81 PVI STA = 34+00 I'M ELEV = 909.00 A.D. _ -2.35 K = 21.25 00% )ATUM ELEV 885.00 Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 35+00 34+00 33+00 32+00 31+00 30+00 29+00 28+00 27+00 26+00 STREET C NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-2 20021071DTP02.DWG e Date 06/17/05 sheet. 10 oa 10 DaWxme&- CRM C2wcke& CRM Dnwa: AIM Remd Drawfas by/data Prepared for. ffilr� TOWN dt COUNTRY HOMES � Liberty at Creek Side Chanhassen, Minnesota Prefiminmy Street Profiles F- U U X IT cu n 0 0 0 (U Cu Cu Cu 3 O CL CL n 0 cu 0 0 Cu a) 3 0 (L 0 cu (U m 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I I I / / vat �- Proposed 50' Abutting Property Setback Line (typ.) NMI �■_ is 0111 Sgt IIIQ� �■..acesa 1I �iriY'1�5iri NE • � = ,111: .: • 1 0 all all mammi -if look akkkkel 10111 �• 1 �• , •,; � ' I'i�1=i�t/L' �i iii H �. ' a�iaa�■a�tlal 1 . � �—II1111111'. n� Westwood Professional Services, Inc 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937.5150 FAX 952-937-5622 TOLL FREE 1-668.937-5150 www.westwoodps.com N00008'59"W 742.33 N00008'59"W 704.89 01 // / 11 10, / / / >0/1 \ / \\ 10000 f / /Proposed 16.5' ��Wetland Buffer (t H ` / C % � N�J 0 0 / o c Q .G fBru0ffPersSetha10k om � `oed 40'Wetland (typ.) 03 N tr9 0 \ O O 1 Oan \ '15,"W— 1 // /.00 // 40 1 hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and flat I an a duty Eomsed LAND SURVEYOR /l tt ' 1 / Calculated Flood Plain Line (typ.) under the laws of the Stake of Mimesofa 02 03/06 Revisions Per City Comments 3 1/0 LOT REVISIONS (Tp) Craig W. Morse Dole 02/03/06 License No. 23021 Crew, Prepared for. Chedicedr cwM Drives SRS Reoord Amft by/date: /date: t. tUli' TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES '�/,�•• V V ��s-�a K�Havimun*Cwnpany Data Total Site Area 36.011 ac. Existing Zoning A-2, Agricultural Preservation Existing Guide Plan Residential Medium Density (4-8 u/a) Proposed Zoning Residential Medium Density —PUD Total Premier Townhomes 98 units Total Concord Townhomes 48 units Overall Density 4.05 un./ac. Outlot A 0.43 acres Total Existing Wetlands 0.90 acres Total Wetland Mit. Area 2.77 acres Total 30% Slopes 1.47 acres Net Developable Area 28.00 acres Net Density 5.21 un./ac. Total Impervious Area 8.71 ac. (3190 of Net) 2 - Street, Street, Roadways and Drives Local Public Street ROW 2.44 ac. Public Street — 60 ft. ROW 31 ft. B—B Private Street 24 ft. B—B Private Drives 20 ft. B—B Building Setbacks (minimums) Public ROW 20 ft. w/walk & 15 ft. w/out walk Private Street 24 ft to back of curb Private Driveway 20 ft. to back of curb Abutting Property 50 ft. Wetiand Buffer 40 ft. Building to Building 20 ft. Porposed Lot Line 10 ft.* Minimum Driveway Length Premier 20 ft. (to curb or walk) Majestic 20 ft. (to curb or walk) NOM 1. The lot dimensions and areas on this plan are approximate. Refer to the Final and supporting data for exact lot dimensions and areas. 2. All setbacks measured excluding stoops, patios, porches or decks. J. *Unless platted as townhomes in which case the common lot will be 0 ft. . DRVWWPRR: PLAlVAWRAVVGIIVBBR/S'URVSYOR.• Town and Country Homes Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7615 Smetana Lane, Suite 180 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 Phone: (952) 253-0462 Phone. (952) 937-5150 Fax. (952) 944-3437 Fax: (952) 937-5822 Contact: Kevin Clark Contact: Chris Moehri Typical Premier Lot Typical Concord Lot 10' 10' Legend Concrete Curb & Gutter Concrete Sidewalk Liberty at Creek Side Citanhusen, Minriesota 10' 10' 01 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAR 0 1 2006 CHANHASSEN PANNING DEPT 0' 100' 200' 300' C-2 20021071PPF01.DWG Date: 6/17/05 sheet 3 OF 10 Preliminary Plat 0 0 N N N M