The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-24_2016-14 REZONE IOP TO PUD IOPMEMORANDUM i(�/, -,Jq A _ ,;� CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director DATE: June 12, 2017 D r!� SUBJ: Paisley Park Museum Update BACKGROUND On October 24, 2016, the City Council approved the PUD and Site Improvement Performance Agreement for Paisley Park. As a part of that approval, staff was to report back on the how museum operations are working. ANALYSIS Site Improvement Performance Agreement Required Improvements. The Developer shall construct the following improvements by the dates indicated: A. Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left turn lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. This condition has been met B. Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. This condition has been met C. Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to "Bus Only" and "Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. A permanent barrier island should be placed in the access to control the right-in/right-out. This condition has been met D. A traffic study shall be completed at 6 and 12 months, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 Todd Gerhardt Paisley Park Museum Update June 12,2017 Page 2 study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. SRF completed a traffic study in May, 2017. Attached is that report The report states no significant operational issues were found E. Landscaping shall be planted by spring of 2017 and maintained per the PUD. The Landscaping plan has been submitted but has not been installed MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES Law Enforcement In the last eight months (since October, 2016) there have been a total of 20 Calls For Service (CFS) to Paisley Park. All of the CFS can be codified as Miscellaneous/Non-Criminal and do not fit in as Group A or B. The majority of the calls were false alarms, a couple of stalled vehicles, and several medicals. There were four calls for suspicious persons and one complaint of someone who stated they didn't receive their tickets online. This is a minimal number of CFS for this location and has a negligible impact on our overall public safety mission in the city. In summary, Paisley Park Studios LLC museum operations does not have a negative impact on law enforcement services. They are a good community partner and have been responsive the few times we have requested they add services; i.e. they contracted with off-duty deputies to assist with traffic control during the memorial celebration week. For comparison purposes, the Chanhassen Dinner Theater generated 27 CFS during the same review period and the majority of those CFS are Miscellaneous/Non-Criminal as well. Building and Fire Department Comments The museum uses a temporary tent for merchandise sales. A tent is a temporary structure and has a permitting time of 180 days. Building inspections gave a 180 -day extension. The permit for a temporary tent expires on September 19, 2017 and cannot be extended. A permit must be applied for and all building and fire codes met. Sewer Access Charge (SAC) determination and payment of all related fees have been paid. Electrical, HVAC and electrical system have been approved. The sprinkling alarm system, egress devices have been updated and approved. Todd Gerhardt Paisley Park Museum Update June 12, 2017 Page 3 The physical building plan currently meets fire code to function for the permitted use as a museum. Recently, Paisley has improved their fire alarm system and notification systems to include voice annunciation that would meet the requirements of an approved concert, in accordance with plans submitted, for seating 1,375. In consultation with Building Official Jerry Mohn, all exiting is in place, properly marked, and functioning to support both the museum and an occasional concert if the conditions of the PUD are satisfied. The definition of a concert is: ANY live performance, which would include amplified music, live artists, theatre lighting, etc. Whether the performance has anything to do with a tour is not a consideration to these requirements. Any concert will require an on-site inspection of the building arrangement prior to the city -approved event taking place. This will include a visual inspection of the seating and stage arrangement to ensure adherence to the submitted plans and applicable fire code requirements are met. Additionally, performers will be required to use the sound board and speakers provided on site to ensure the alarm notification system works properly as demonstrated during final acceptance testing. On-site inspections may include observation of the actual event during operation. The ordinance also allows for private events. Paisley should utilize the special event permit process to ensure full approval from all city departments prior to the event. This would allow the fire department to review applicable fire codes as they relate to whatever type of event is being held beyond the permitted use, i.e. clearing the main sound stage area of museum displays to add a full stage and seating for a concert or major gathering of people other than a concert. SUMMARY The operation of the museum continues to evolve as the owner refines their business model. Staff has a good relationship with the operators and they are responsive to any concerns the staff has. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 2. PUD Ordinance. 3. Traffic Study by SFR dated June 5, 2017. g:\plan12016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museumkc update 6-12-2017.dmx Document No. A639072 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Recorded on -December 27, 2016 3:19 PM Fee: $46.00 IIIIII VIII III II III David Frischmon 639072 County Recorder (reservedjor recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT PAISLEY PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT dated October 24, 2016, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and Paisley Park Facility, LLC. BACKGROUND. A. The City has approved a rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park to Planned Unit Development ("PUD"). The PUD requires the Developer to enter in this Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 2. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall construct the following improvements by the dates indicated: A. Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left turn lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drivefthe southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. B. Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. C. Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to "Bus Only" and "Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. A permanent barrier island should be placed in the access to control the right-in/right-out. 1880550 D. A traffic study shall be completed at 6 and 12 months, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. E. Landscaping shall be planted by spring of 2017 and maintained per the PUD. 3. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 4. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $25,000.00. 5. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. B. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. D. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property and/or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. E. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other 1880550 agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. F. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. G. The Developer represents to the City that the development complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 6. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 7. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Paisley Park Facility, LLC, c/o Bremer Trust, National Association, 1100 West St. Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, PO Box147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317- 0147. (The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.) 1aeo55vi STATE OF MINNESOTA )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: 2, Denny ufenburgr, Mayor AND: Ati odd Gerhardt, City Manager T e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of i c, r , 2016, by Denny Laufenburger and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. =MEUWISSEN'Oy _ 188055VI NOTA Y PUMIC DEVELOPER: PAISLEY PARK FACILITY, LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company By, BREMER TRUST, National Association Its Sole Member By: Alison A. Hauck, Special Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF_ ) _./_ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Li ` day of 2016, by Alison A. Hauck, the Special Administrator of Bremer Trust, National Association, the sole member of Paisley Park Facility, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. 1 � NOTARY PUBLIC NICOLE E. OLMSCHEID QNOTAR! PUMIC- MINNESOTA Mycommimm E*m im mty71,2021 DRAFTED BY: XCAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association ,V860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 [RNK) 188055v] CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City s zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, MN Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development A. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District shall apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted: 1. Museum. 2. Recording studio. 3. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than twenty percent (20%) of the floor space is used for retail sales. These sales may include food, beverages and memorabilia. 4. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each concert. 5. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each event. 6. Office. 7. Multiple buildings on a lot. C. Conditional Uses. The following conditional use is permitted: 1. Hotel. d. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses. 1890870 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. e. Materials and Design Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. L Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -in for buses only and right -out only for buses, and passenger vehicles. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 24, 2016. 5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses, junipers and barberry. g. Parking 1. Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access. 4. All required permits, including from the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. 5. The north access shall be limited to a right -in for buses only and right -out of the site for buses and passenger vehicles. 2 1890870 6. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the SRF study. 7. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus. 8. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shall be by bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest cars per hour maximum. 9. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking or guests shall be bused to and from the site. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24's day of October, 2016, by the City Council of the City of sen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Lautenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Pillager on November 3, 2016) 3 18908W3 Ll ,k4I I ENGINEERS PLANNERS Consulting Group, Inc. Y DESIGNERS Draft Traffic Operations Review SRFNa 01710651 To: Paul Oehme, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Chanhassen From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Tom Sachi, PE, Senior Engineer Date: June 5, 2017 Subject: Paisley Park Traffic Operations Review Introduction As part of the Paisley Park Museum approval in the fall of 2016, City staff was directed to assess traffic operations approximately six (6) months after the museum opening. Since the previous 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study, dated September 15, 2016 and the 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement, dated October 19, 2016 were based on a series of assumptions, the purpose of this review is to determine how the transportation system is operating relative to the study expectations. Therefore, the primary objectives of this review are to identify/compare area traffic volumes/patterns, site trip generation, intersection capacity, and pedestrian compliance. The following information provides a summary of the review findings. Traffic Volumes Intersection turning movement counts were collected along Audubon Road at the following locations between Thursday, May 18 and Saturday, May 20, 2017. The traffic volumes were collected between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. at the Paisley Park site access locations to determine the daily traffic volume profiles for the site, which are illustrated in Figure 1. A detailed trip generation comparison is provided later in this review. 1) MN Highway 5 4) Coulter Boulevard 2) North Paisley Park Access 5) Park Road 3) McGlynn Drive/South Paisley Park Access At the non -site access study intersections, only the weekday p.m. peak and Saturday midday peak hours were counted. A summary of the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hour conditions are shown in Figure 2. To illustrate how traffic volumes have changed since the Paisley Park Museum opening, a comparison was completed between the recently collected data with the previous data collected in 2016. Based on this comparison shown in Figure 3, traffic volumes along Audubon Road (north of McGlynn Drive) have generally increased by approximately 500 vehicles per day. The change is a result of a combination of newly generated traffic from the museum, as well as general daily variations in traffic. During the Saturday midday peak hour, minimal changes in volumes were observed. It should be noted that the Saturday morning car events at the AutoMotorPlex have moved to Canterbury Park. ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 I MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 1763.475.0010 1 W W W.SRFCONSUL7WG.COM &I p\ � Museum Traffic Volumes ,o Paisley Park Traffic Study omosst City of Chanhassen June 2017 Figure 1 Weekday Museuem Traffic Volumes - May 18, 2017 25 20 I u 15 E 6 0 > 30 5 0 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM Time —*—Weekday Enter Total t Weekday Exit Total Saturday Museuem Traffic Volumes - May 20, 2017 8 25 . z' a `g q 20 m m � d 15 @ E 0 n > 10 5 N r 0 p 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM g Time 43 --*—Saturday Enter Total —*--Saturday Exit Total s a` x &I p\ � Museum Traffic Volumes ,o Paisley Park Traffic Study omosst City of Chanhassen June 2017 Figure 1 W OIN I May 2017 Conditions Figure 2 (ornu„m Group. Inc. Paisley Park Traffic Study 001710651 City of Chanhassen June 2017 8 pN G E 0 U o I 1 r► , P b O +10 (41) 31 ro_m vvP. e _W + O 0(3)+3 m L45 (53) +8 4 1594(1553)-41 r76 (96) +20, �+26 (30) 41 I 1 r► +82 (1069) 987 N N N +10 (41) 31 ro_m vvP. _W + O 0(3)+3 2( +2 W H a � u°i a w 72 (87)+15 44 (38) -6 � Io m W� N W m �- + + H - 0(4)M - Fall 2016 represents conditions prior to the opening of the museum while May 2017 represents conditions 6 months after the museum opening. 0 (0) o H i � + o v S Nme L13 (15) +2 X911(815)+4 r 74 (eo) +6 +2 (5) 34 fi I 10, +2(1066 1053 �i a +7 (42) 35--� ro_m vvP. h H 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 0 o Y~� $ o �I^ 25(18)-7 11 (7) -4 W �W m W r H IMP LEGEND XX - Fall 2016 Peak Hour Volume (XX) - May 2017 Peak Hour Volume +�- - Change in Counts X,XXX Fall 2016 Average Daily Traffic Volume - May 2017 Average Daily Traffic Volume 0 - Side -Street Stop Control - Signal Control Traffic and Pedestrian Volume Comparison Figure 3 Paisley Park Traffic Study 001710651 City of Chanhassen June 2017 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen Paisley Park Traffic Operations Review Trip Generation Comparison June 5, 2017 Page 5 A trip generation comparison was completed to identify how the museum currently generates traffic (based on the data recently collected) in comparison to the previous study assumptions. The previous study assumed the museum would generate approximately 150 peak hour trips and 1,850 daily trips, which assumed a sold -out condition. Based on the recent traffic data collected, the museum generated approximately 37 weekday p.m. peak hour, 85 Saturday midday peak hour, and between 550 and 800 daily trips, depending on the day of the week. Specific visitor or employee data was not currently available to determine the ratio of vehicle trips to the number of visitors. A summary of the previous study assumptions and the recently collected site trip generation are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Trip Generation Estimate (1) Based on data provided by project staff. (2) Represents the maximum number of trips expected to be generated (assumes sold -out tours throughout the day) for both a weekday and Saturday. (3) 550 represents the weekday daily traffic volumes, while the 800 represents the Saturday daily traffic volumes. Intersection Capacity Analysis Comparison An intersection capacity analysis comparison was completed for the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours to determine how area traffic operations have changed since the museum opening. Intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SitriTraffic (Version 9) and compared to the intersection level of service data provided in the previous study. A summary of the previous and current level of service results from the intersection capacity analysis for the weekday p.m. peak hour and Saturday midday peak hours are shown in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. Results of the May 2017 weekday p.m. peak hour intersection capacity analysis indicate that the study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or better with the existing geometric layout, traffic controls, and museum in operation. All side -streets along Audubon Road also operate at acceptable levels of service. However, it should be noted that the northbound left -tum queues from the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection extend beyond the existing Paisley Park North Access approximately 25 percent of the weekday p.m. peak hour. Furthermore, the westbound left - turn 95th percentile queue at the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection extend approximately 235 feet during the weekday p.m. peak hour, which is less than half of the available storage. Weekday P.M. Saturday Midday Trip Generation Condition Size Peak Hour Trips Peak Hour Trips Daily Trips In Out In Out October 2016 Estimated 165 Guests per hour 75 75 75 75 1,850121 Paisley Park Museum 111 (2.5 Guests/Vehicle) May 2017 Actual 17 20 50 35 550131 Paisley Park Museum (800)131 -1,300 Difference 58 -55 -25 -40 (-1,050) (1) Based on data provided by project staff. (2) Represents the maximum number of trips expected to be generated (assumes sold -out tours throughout the day) for both a weekday and Saturday. (3) 550 represents the weekday daily traffic volumes, while the 800 represents the Saturday daily traffic volumes. Intersection Capacity Analysis Comparison An intersection capacity analysis comparison was completed for the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours to determine how area traffic operations have changed since the museum opening. Intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SitriTraffic (Version 9) and compared to the intersection level of service data provided in the previous study. A summary of the previous and current level of service results from the intersection capacity analysis for the weekday p.m. peak hour and Saturday midday peak hours are shown in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. Results of the May 2017 weekday p.m. peak hour intersection capacity analysis indicate that the study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or better with the existing geometric layout, traffic controls, and museum in operation. All side -streets along Audubon Road also operate at acceptable levels of service. However, it should be noted that the northbound left -tum queues from the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection extend beyond the existing Paisley Park North Access approximately 25 percent of the weekday p.m. peak hour. Furthermore, the westbound left - turn 95th percentile queue at the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection extend approximately 235 feet during the weekday p.m. peak hour, which is less than half of the available storage. Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen Paisley Park Traffic Operations Review Tabie 2 Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Comparison Audubon Road Intersection Scenario Level of Service 1DeW Oct 2016 No PP Event PP Event (2K Guests) Car I May 2017 PP Event I MN Highway 5 B (17 sec.) B (19 sec.) C (21 sec.) Paisley Park North Access I17 A/B (10 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (10 sec.) Paisley Park South Access/McGlynn Road I11 A/B (12 sec.) A/B (14 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) Coulter Boulevard Ill A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) q/B (14 sec.) Park Road (l) A/B (11 sec.) I A/B (11 sec.) I A/B (11 sec.) June 5, 2017 Page 6 (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst sidestreet approach delay. Comparing the October 2016 (i.e. non -museum) condition and the previously assumed event conditions (i.e. PP Event (2k Guests) Car Only), the Paisley Park driveways, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road intersections operate at similar levels of service. The MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS C, with delays increasing more than previously expected. However, the increase is this location is primarily a result in the change in traffic volumes unrelated to the Paisley Park Museum and since the intersection still operates well within the acceptable range, no mitigation is necessary. Results of the May 2017 Saturday midday peak hour intersection capacity analysis indicate that the study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better with the existing geometric layout, traffic control, and museum in operation. Comparing the October 2016 (i.e. non - museum) condition with the May 2017 data, the operations are similar. At the Paisley Park South Access, the maximum observed southbound left -tum queue into the site was approximately 50 feet (i.e. two vehicles). This queue was a result of the security checkpoint location, which was immediately beyond the gate. If queues on Audubon Road become an issue, the checkpoint could be moved further into the parking lot. Table 3 Saturday Midday Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Comparison (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. Delay shown represents the worst siclestreet approach delay. Scenario Level of Service Dela May 2017 Audubon Road Intersection Oct 2016 Event No PP Event (Actual) (A MN Highway 5 B (12 sec.) B (12 sec.) Paisley Park North Access (1) N/A A/B (10 sec.) Paisley Park South Access/McGlynn Road Ill N/A A/B (11 sec.) Coulter Boulevard Ill A/B (10 sec.) A/B (10 sec.) Park Road Ill a//A (9 sec.) I A/B (10 sec.) (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. Delay shown represents the worst siclestreet approach delay. Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen June 5, 2017 Paisley Park Traffic Operations Review Page 7 Pedestrian and Parking Compliance Observations were completed to assess the number of pedestrians crossing Audubon Road to access the Paisley Park area. This included crossings at MN Highway 5 and both site driveways. It should be noted that there are no pedestrian facilities on the east side of Audubon Road and pedestrians are discouraged from walking along the grassy area immediately adjacent to Paisley Park. During the weekday p.m. peak hour, there were three (3) pedestrians that crossed Audubon Road at both MN Highway 5 and the South Site Access. The pedestrians that crossed at MN Highway 5 were using the adjacent trail and did not access Paisley Park. The pedestrians that crossed Audubon Road at the South Site Access entered the museum parking lot. Throughout the day, there was a total of approximately 12 pedestrians that were observed crossing Audubon Road at the South Site Access. Pedestrian crossings in this location should continue to be discouraged, although no further mitigation is currently necessary. No pedestrian activity was observed over the course of the day on Saturday, although rainy conditions were present which likely impacted pedestrian activity. It should be noted that pedestrian activity has decreased since the museum opening. To provide some perspective, observations completed in October 2016 during the museum opening weekend indicated approximately 59 pedestrians crossing Audubon Road during the Saturday midday period. The reduction in pedestrian activity is likely due to a combination of the restricted parking on McGlynn Road, additional area signage directing pedestrians, and a general decrease in demand. From a parking perspective, visitors to the museum are directed to park within the site and not along McGlynn Road or Audubon Road, which prohibit parking. However, vehicles were observed turning onto McGlynn Road, parking for a short duration, and making a U-turn in the cul-de-sac to access Audubon Road. There were some vehicles observed going into Paisley Park from McGlynn Road, with others making turns onto Audubon Road. While parking is not allowed along McGlynn Road, the majority of the vehicles made an immediate U-turn and continued on. F1'\Pmj,*\I00X\10651\TS\R"A10657 Dm#._ s1gPakT,4kStwey_170605.d� August 17, 2017 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning forTomorrow Paisley Park Business Manager 7801 Audubon Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Paisley Park Business Manager, As you are aware, the museum uses a temporary tent for merchandise sales. A tent is a temporary structure and has a permitting time of 180 days. Building inspections has already given a 180 - day extension which cannot be extended again. The permit for the temporary tent expires on September 19, 2017 and must be removed at that time. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me at kaanenson(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us or 952- 227-1139. Sincerely, a l9° Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director ec: Building Official Joel Weinshanker, Paisley Park Management Shannon Pratt, Paisley Park Management PH9s2.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 0 W ON I DESNG NE RS Consulting Group, Inc. SRF 10651.PP May 2, 2017 Paul Oehme, PE City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Subject: Proposal for Professional Services for. Paisley Park Traffic Study Dear Mr. Oehme, Based on your request, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. (SRF) is pleased to submit this proposal to conduct the 6 -month follow up traffic study for the Paisley Park Museum in the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. The site has been in operation for approximately six months and as part of the approval process is required to identify and analyze current operations relative to the previous study. The main objectives of this study are to quantify the vehicular and pedestrian operations within the area, identify any capacity, parking, or pedestrian issues, and recommend potential improvements to ensure safe and efficient traffic operations and circulation. Based on our understanding of the proposed request, the following scope of services was developed. Scope of Services We propose to carry out the work described as follows: Collect up to 13 hours of vehicular and pedestrian counts during both a weekday and Saturday condition at the following intersections along Audubon Road: • MN Highway 5 at Coulter Boulevard • North Site Access • Park Road • McGlynn Drive/South Site Access 2. Analyze weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hour operations within the study area. The specific timeframes will be based on a combination of the previous analysis, as well as the peak period for the museum. 3. Qualitatively assess observed pedestrian activity within the study area, including compliance with current regulations. 4. Determine what improvements, if any, are needed to address any issues identified. www.srfconsulting.com One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 1 Minneapolis, MN 5S4474443 1 763.475.0010 Fax: 763.475.2429 An Equal Opportunity Employer Paul Oehme, PE May 2, 2017 Paisley Park Traffic Study Page 2 5. Prepare a draft technical memorandum documenting the findings and recommendations. Revise as appropriate based on Client review and prepare a final study. 6. Provide day-to-day project management and administration, as well as project coordination with the Client. One (1) meeting is included within this scope of services. Schedule We are prepared to complete this review immediately upon notification to proceed and will complete this work on a mutually agreed-upon time schedule. Basis of Payment/Budget We propose to be reimbursed for our services on an hourly basis for the actual time expended. Other direct project expenses, such as printing, supplies, reproduction, etc., will be billed at cost, and mileage will be billed at the current allowable IRS rate for business miles. Invoices are submitted on a monthly basis for work performed during the previous month. Payment is due within 30 days. Based on our understanding of the project, the total cost of our services is not to exceed $7,000.00. Changes in the Scope of Services It is understood that if the scope or extent of work changes, the cost will be adjusted accordingly. Before any out -of -scope work is initiated, however, we will submit a budget request for the new work and will not begin work until we receive authorization from you. Standard Terms and Conditions The attached Standard Terms and Conditions (Attachment A), together with this proposal for professional services, constitute the entire agreement between the Client and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. and supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified, or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. a Paul Oehme, PE Paisley Park Traffic Study Acceptance/Notice to Proceed May 2, 2017 Page 3 A signed copy of this proposal, mailed or emailed to our office, will serve as acceptance of this proposal and our notice to proceed. The email address is mpacyna@srfconsulting.com. We sincerely appreciate your consideration of this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Matthew Pacyna, P.E. (MIN, ND, WI) Senior Associate Attachment A — Standard Terms and Conditions MP/TS/ld AL ✓l" stgnature) Name �iCC� Patrick Corkle, P.E. (MIN, WI, NE), PTOE Principal Title C Y Date This cost proposal is valid for a period of 90 days. SRF reserves the right to adjust its cost estimate after 90 days from the date of this proposal. [S.\Marketing\P,p,xa1s\20171etterPmjiamG\10651 PmhyPark TrafftcSmdy\P1710651_PairkjPark_Tr4L-Sbuly_170501.da ] ATTACHMENT A STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Standard Terms and Conditions together with the attached Proposal for Professional Services constitute the entire Agreement between the CLIENT and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. ("SRF') and supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This Agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified, or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. 1. STANDARD OF CARE a. The standard of care for all professional services performed or furnished by SRF under this Agreement will be the care and skill ordinarily used by members of SRF's profession practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locality. SRF makes no warranties, expressed or implied, under the Agreement or otherwise, in connection with SRF's service. b. The CLIENT shall be responsible for, and SRF may rely upon, the accuracy and completeness of all requirements, programs, instructions, reports, data, and other information furnished by CLIENT to SRF pursuant to this Agreement. SRF may use such requirements, reports, data, and information in performing or furnishing services under this Agreement. 2. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR All duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the CLIENT and SRF and not for the benefit of any other party. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the CLIENT or SRF. SRF's services under this Agreement are being performed solely for the CLIENT's benefit, and no other entity shall have any claims against SRF because of this Agreement or the performance or nonperformance of services hereunder. 3. PAYMENT TO SRF Invoices will be prepared in accordance with SRF's standard invoicing practices and will be submitted to the CLIENT by SRF monthly, unless otherwise agreed. Invoices are due and payable within thirty (30) days of receipt. If the CLIENT fails to make any payment due SRF for services and expenses within forty-five (45) days after receipt of SRF's invoice thereafter, the amounts due SRF will be increased at the rate of 1-1/2% per month (or the maximum rate of interest permitted by law, if less). In addition, SRF may, after giving seven days written notice to the CLIENT, suspend services under this Agreement until SRF has been paid in full of amounts due for services, expenses, and other related charges. 4. OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST Any opinions of costs prepared by SRF represent its judgment as a design professional and are furnished for thy general guidance of the CLIENT. Since SRF has no control over the cost of labor, materials, market condition, or competitive bidding, SRF does not guarantee the accuracy of such cost opinions as compared to contractor or supplier bids or actual cost to the CLIENT. 5. INSURANCE SRF will maintain insurance coverage for Workers' Compensation, General Liability; Automobile Liability and Professional Liability and will provide certificates of insurance to the CLIENT upon request. 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND ALLOCATION OF RISK a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, SRF agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the CLIENT,.their officers, directors and employees against all damages, liabilities or costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs) to the extent caused by SRF's negligent acts under this Agreement and that of its subconsultants or anyone for whom SRF is legally liable. b. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the CLIENT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless SRF, their officers, directors and employees against all damages, liabilities or costs to the extent caused by the CLIENT's negligent acts under this Agreement and anyone for whom the CLIENT is legally liable. 7. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Either party may at any time, upon seven days prior written notice to the other party, terminate this Agreement. Upon such termination, the CLIENT shall pay to SRF all amounts owing to SRF under this Agreement, for all work performed up to the effective date of termination. 8. OWNERSHIP AND REUSE OF DOCUMENTS All documents prepared or famished by SRF pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service, and SRF shall retain an ownership and property interest therein. Reuse of any such documents by the CLIENT shall be at CLIENT's sole risk; and the CLIENT agrees to indemnify, and hold SRF harmless from all claims, damages, and expenses including attorney's fees arising out of such reuse of documents by the CLIENT or by others acting through the CLIENT. Page 1 of 2 (hod Standard Terms and Conditions) Rev: March 5, 2014 9. USE OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA a. Copies of Documents that may be relied upon by the CLIENT are limited to the printed copies (also known as hard copies) that are signed or sealed by SRF. Files in electronic media format of text, data, graphics, or of other types that are furnished by SRF to the CLIENT are only for convenience of the CLIENT. Any conclusion or information obtained or derived from such electronic files will be at the user's sole risk. b. When transferring documents in electronic media format, SRF makes no representations as to long-term compatibility, usability, or readability of documents resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by SRF at the beginning of this Assignment. c. If there is a discrepancy between the electronic files and the hard copies, the hard copies govern. d. Because data stored in electronic media format can deteriorate or be modified inadvertently or otherwise without authorization of this data's creator, the party receiving electronic files agrees that it will perform acceptance tests or procedures within sixty (60) days, after which the receiving party shall be deemed to have accepted the data thus transferred. Any errors detected within the sixty (60) day acceptance period will be corrected by the party delivering the electronic files. SRF shall not be responsible to maintain documents stored in electronic media format after acceptance by the CLIENT. 10. FORCE MAIEURE SRF shall not be liable for any loss or damage due to failure or delay in rendering any service called for under this Agreement resulting from any cause beyond SRF's reasonable control. 11. ASSIGNMENT Neither party shall assign its rights, interests or obligations under this Agreement without the express written consent of the other party. 12. BINDING EFFECT This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits thereof shall inure to the respective parties hereto, their legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. 13. SEVERABB.rrY AND WAIVER OF PROVISIONS Any provisions or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable under any laws or regulations shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon the CLIENT and SRF, who agree that the Agreement shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. Non -enforcement of any provision by either party shall not constitute a waiver of that provision, not shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. 14. SURVIVAL All provisions of this Agreement regarding Ownership of Documents and Reuse of Documents, Electronic Media provisions, Indemnification and Allocation of Risk, and Dispute Resolution shall remain in effect. 15. DISPUTE RESOLUTION If negotiation in good faith fails to resolve a dispute within the thirty (30) days of notice of the dispute, or time period specified by applicable law, then the parties agree that each dispute, claim or controversy arising from or related to this Agreement or the relationships which result from this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to initiating legal or equitable actions by either party. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the mediation shall be in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association then currently in effect. A request for mediation shall be filed in writing with the American Arbitration Association and the other party. No legal or equitable action may be instituted for a period of ninety (90) days from the filing of the request for mediation unless a longer period of time is provided by agreement of the parties. Cost of mediation shall be shared equally between the parties. Mediation shall be held in a location mutually agreed upon by the parties. The parties shall memorialize any agreement resulting from the mediation in a mediated settlement agreement, which agreement shall be enforceable as a settlement in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 16. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the principal place of business of SRF. 17. SITE SAFETY SRF shall not at any time supervise, direct, control or have authority over or charge of, nor be responsible for, the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety and security precautions and programs in connection with the work performed by any Contractor for the Project, nor for any failure of any Contractor to comply with laws and regulations applicable to such Contractor's work, since these are solely the Contractor's rights and responsibilities. SRF shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any Contractor or Owner, or any of their agents or employees, or of any other persons (except SRF's own employees and consultants), furnishing or performing any work for the Project, except as specifically outlined in SRF's scope of services. Page 2 of 2 (MN Standard Terms and Conditions) Rev: March 5, 2014 r- 06A Al� OIL J 3.39631.1 a0.112IXS.a 'I / / / I - I �I MEC.ICAL IN, — �L — SHOWER IE - MEMOVE FIMINl9 0 SHINER •G� S L ■ ■I ■ Iola B ■ ■ f ■ ■ f. ■ ■ f ■. 1 ■ ■I ■ 1 ■' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■IT f ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ l ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 ■ ■ ■ f ■ f ■ f ■ ■. ■ f ■ l l ■ ■ ■, ■ f ■ ■ ■ ■ PHASE 2: E INIMT 1 HE AAEE 000IFMT LOAD SIGNAGE IN EIELET EALL ICING SF. 17.1.317=UFANTS. STAGE =1375 1,10 NCNI'pFD SEAT A0 SED.OCC PANT LOAD X a 2= REQUIRED MOTH IN INCHES OF EGIERS EXNBIiHNl WCLPAMLOAP. E ITTBNG FIXED ACWSTI GENI AREA CAUC. TMQN FROM INSIDE FACE liitr4 PHASE 2: TEMPORARY STRUCTURE +I • • ••• • • • • •••• ice• • • • • ••• •F%r III • • 1 • • • • • • •IT • • • G _ Y I Y I :OCCUPANT LOAD/ SEATING PLAN 'TEE EGG' NOT APART OF 7M REMN PEACE OCCUPANT LOAD SONAC£ N LOBBY fill S F 15=163OCCUPAYIS 907.2.1.1 SYSTEM INITIATION IN GROUP OCCUPANCIES WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 1,000 OR MORE: ACWAT OR OF TRE FEE ALARM IN GROUPAOGQPNICES WRH.W Cf:CIAANTLOAD OF 1,000 OR MORE SHALL INITIATE A SIGNAL USNGMJEIEROENCY VOICEMAfM COMMMIGTI(ML4 SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION N7522 EXISTING SYSTEMS TO BE RENEWED BY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS 907.3 FIRE SAFETY FUNCTIONS: AUTOMATIC FIRE DETECTORS UTILIZED FOR THE PURPDSE OF PERFORMING FIRE S1FEtt FUNCT ON" SMALL BE CONNECTED TO TRE BUILDING'S FIRE MMM CONRIOL UNIT WHERE A FIRE AWtM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED BY SECTION 9372 DETECTORS SEAL1lMCN ACTUATION. PERFORM TRE INTENDED CTION FUNAND ACTUATE THE ALARM NOTIFIGTION APPLIANCES OR ACTUATE A VISIBLE AND AUDIBLESUPERVISORYSIGN ATACONSTN YATTENDEDLOCATION. INBWLOINGSNOT EQUIPPED WIM A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. THE AUTOMATIC FIRE DETECTOR SHAL BE POWERED SY NORMAL ELECTRONIC SERWCE AND. UPON ACTUATORS, PERFORM THE INTENDED FUNCTION. THE DETECTORS SHALL BE LOCATED IN ACCORDANCE WTEH NEPA 72 EXISTING SYSTEMS TO BE RENEWED BY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS 907.5.2.3 VISIBLE ALARMS: VWIGLEMMM NOMFICATON NRWM.ES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WDH SECTIONS 9J752].1 THROUGH 901 EXISTING SYSTEMS TO BE RENEWED BY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS EXCEPTIONS: 1. WSEIEMMM NOTIFICATION MR4WCESANE NOT REWIRED EALTEMTONS.IXCEPT WHFAE M! STEM LSU FEE MMY SYSTEM ALARM NODEDORRFR.Km.CRA NEWFIREALARM SYSTEMI$NSTALLE 2 VISRIE MAXM NOTNMATON APPLIANCES 9WLLL NOT BE REQUIRED IN EXRS/S CEFNED 3.WCNMH2 EVISELEMMMTEMSMETRICTON APP REVIEWED BY QBELAFIEDLIN RELESSI NAL EXISTING SYSTEMS TO BE RENEWED BY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS 907.5.2.3.1 PUBLIC AND COMMON AREAS: VISIBIEAMY NOTIFICATION APPLIANCES SHAL SEROVIDED N PUBLIC AREAS AND COMLION AREAS, EXISTING SYSTEMS TO BE RENEWED BY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS 1204.1 TEMPERATURE CONTROL - EQUIPMENT 8 SYSTEMS : INTERIOR SPACES INTEMaIED FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY SHALL BE PROWLED WITR ACTUE OR PAGSUE $PACE HEATING SYSTEMS CAPAIRE CF MAINTAINING AN INDOOR TEMP, OF NOT IESS THAN BEEF ATA POW 3 FEET ABOVE TRE FLWR ON THE DESIGN HEATING DAY, EXISTING SYSTEMS TO BE RENEWED BY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS SECTION 3103 TEMPORARY STRUCTURES: 3103.1 GENERAL' THE PROVISIONS OE SECIION331MI THROWN 310A SMALL AINI ro SmUCTURES ERI FOR A PERIOD OF LESS THON IN MY3. TENTS MIO OTHER MEMBRANE STRUCTURES ERECTED FORA PFA.'OO OF LESS THAN 130 DAYS SHALL COWLY'MIN TIE INTERNATIONAL FRE CODE, THLISE ENECIED Fqi ALOHGER PENIN Cf 1NE SHNL CCAPLY WTO1 APEICAEE SECIIC160F THIS CODE 3103.1.1 PERMIT REQUIRED: TEMPORARY STRUCTURES THAT(AVER AN AREA GREATER TRAIN 110 SWME FEET INCLUDING _ CONNECTINGMFAStlLSPACESWTMAG NMffMiSOFEGREGGORFNIMNCEWHICHARE NOT_USEDORINTENOFDMBE USED FOR THE GATNERNGTWETIERCf T00 WM EF£RSpN5.3NN1 FRO BE ERECTED CPBUTTJ! qR M.UMAHEO FOR AW NRPLTSE WITIOUTC6TAXG APERMR FRQN T11E BWLDIND OFFlCLLL. 3103.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: A PERMIT APPLICATION AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR EACH INSTALLATION OF A TEMPORARY SIRUCNRE TRE CONSTRUCTION W EENEEN S SHLLL INCURS A SITE PLAN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE TELE CARRY STRUCTURE AND NFOMNTION DELINEATING THE MENS OF EGRESS NEE THE OCpAMR LEND 3103.3 LOCATION: TEMPORARY STRUCTURES OONTHIRIE BE LANCED ENOOFT NCE EENEE IO W LEWOR THE BOF TALE AL2 BASSOON ME RREAE36TANL£ MTNGti THE E%1Elilpi WN19 FORTIS PROPOSED TYPE OF COHSTRIICTMM. ARCHITECT: A� HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS 31572 SNOWBALL ROAD PENGILLY, MN 55715 651631-0200 OFFICE 218-929-9171 BRIANWHOUWMAN@YAHOO.COM ISTlrlrr■r,■rereeeT MM rlwe■e�e®M® rrI■Ar®ar�alr f1M■■f�■ Oe 11 r 1♦N NOTE 3103.4 MEANS OF EGRESS: PRGIRTLOCAM PAISLEY PARK 7801 ABeueDn M. GIROaAA•B, MN 55317 BUILDING MANAGER ESTATE OF PRINCE ROGERS NELSON C/o BREMER TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 1100 WEST ST. GERMAN ST ST. CLOUD. MN 56302 GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO BE DETERMINED OCCUPANT LOAD/ SEATING A1.1 THIS BET OF PLANS IS FOR A DESIGN -BUILD PROJECT. TEMPOPARY STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO THE LEANS OF EGRESS REWIREMENi9 OF ANY INFORMATION NOT CLARIFIED QNplER 10 AND EWL RAVE M pOIAWEySTRAyg ESTMCE OF 100 ORLEW BY MANUFACTURER PERFORMANCE 2901. REQUIRED PLUMBING FUCTURES: REQUIREMENTS OR DETAILS ON THIS TOTAL WCLMANT LOAD - EXHIBIT HALL NS/ -SETA PM%, LOBS' alb &TEMP-TENT0165= LINN OCC 'S PUN SET ARE 109012=915PERSEX TOBE OETEPMINEB NEWNESS FORWES' MEN -1 STOOL 125 DOOR= F STOOLS BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WOMEN -1 STOOLI IN OCCS=15 STOOLS AND THE OWNER MENMOMFN-1 ENIV M= 5.. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PUNS NUMBER OF FUrnIRES WES HOT MEET REOUEBENIS IF ALL AEX.S WHERE OCCUPIED AT ONE TINE. ANO FIELD CONDITIONS WHICH REQUIRE PROJECT WALENOTHAVE FULL OCCUPMCY N ALL ALFAS ATONE TME THE CONTRACTOR TO CHOOSE EXHBrt RML WLr CCCVPANCY REDO IIEMEIIS: ONE METN00 DIMENSION 1.3750C=2- eeBaccs PER soc OR MATERIAL OVER ANOTHER ARE TO WIN STOOLI las=a ST°°Ls BE BROUGHT TO THE PROJECT FRWYES 2 STORIES 14 UrW5.1 UTANN. ACES 1 STOOL ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT WOMEN I STOCU N� 11 STOOI4 PRMECTPROUIX!SAS*N5PERSEX BEFORE WORK IS STARTED, FOR CLARIFICATION. PROPOSED REQUIRED FIXTURES REVIEW BET 9.13-16 LOBBY A SET-UP WILL BE OCCUPIED UNTIL EXHIBIT HALL IS OPEN MAIN FLOOR PERMIT SET ONLY - 9.28.16 WALK THRU COMMENTS 10.16 CITY COMMENTS 11-29-16 REVIEW EXHIBIT HALL OCC'S 12.14.16 CITY COMMENTS 12.2616 BASEMENT&'EGG' 1.17.17 SAC REDETERMINATION 2.28.17 JOB# 16-136 DATE 9.13-16 DRAWN NH CHECKED BH OCCUPANT LOAD/ SEATING A1.1 PHASE 2 TEAMORARYTEYT q� MSRGNTAE-ANCAIARrroAO aFwTKm-AxcuAPrro.w _ - . l _ _ _ _ _ CW � - ODG LND11a SF.l3Mp0009 OCGIOIO3Aa5F.113-to OG.9 - - - _ � Y 0.188 Si.I]0-1120003 fM[ _ }EXI1S flEgIPEO - _—__ 3 EXIT9 PROVIDED � (] � �� i LLL Illi I v '.' �� P4EAE s11e�nwDFsoenMuc zo9roTx occlrANrs a I ® ® Brx ®•.• MB1pNE50mIW 'R LOBBY `- FOYER 17 � -Bw..H I onr sro«cE RaENt9K Fn aFP/030 fDBTHIMI _ - - ' t RMSEtmarAa MuaTr 10.0.8F-1a-3aoG0� J :oan� (\) aFzms wwnm� NPx 1,wzs F./w=uaxs 1i AP I r 1EwT REWI zFXI1S C BYW PPo DFD SCOPE OF WORM: `� � t.AIL£1EYI wNLSDOdI SY MENSTpI:f NOpIHY \� ].I.RIGEIEVEA IIMOWNE WTIHC 8Yi8 � 1PAMGIPS 02 BRPE3 E ® r II uH IN nMAIN FLOOR PLAN_HIMODDRINDID. FES A20 SCALP:Y -II _ MODERNmBN.iBa000R IIIH ® A \ E "PAMCIwmYAla: `ITy}J9 0 9 P USI.- MPHR/ 000P IOD v 1 mwrTIBLYM1al000R TO woRK PROPERLY IAO PMSCIIAMAIII/IE GENERAL NOTES: � ElmrreaS ElAEaaExc3-Ea�INa3ttNGR�ssG AOOI)011®EMftMm 1, INFERIOR GDNSM CngI TO BE OF NON{OIBUBTI.E �,EmIWOE1BM614'Y EuaaslNMttRB P1H -� ❑ ❑ LIEW 2 NL 1000 OOOPS TO HAVE MW RPL SOELLWfY514PWM4pMOETCMWSIDER.EDFIatMBCCY®NTION I� FA35pX M1111EMEm@I01'EOm9Sl1[MIq F NO CLOSURE, IF 90TH CLOR IPE 6 LATCH ARE INBTPLLED I 12'ME REWIPEp. qLL P.O^RgTOINVE I£VER WNCIES C/ F� /� EMSINGLIGNI®ELTBNiI 3..LLL EABTWG EGRES5000R5 WITH PADDLE LOCK. T PMpELOfME PFl10VFD dVpE OLET TOOSIC Ig] E1mt.G FxE E%nx,Wm331 IId� ONE TAP[ EPN. E%ISINO PAPIC IMfgYNE O � - - xPx tagLe EAIBTWO HI11mWAEx1OPANCItNYlM1E - roEmtrN3 DR IEYI Doca "Wi w� palmlEODnRO i-! rCOURT A Y aF51CBiIlOID COMRI0.T Am PAIa0.110MME TN.OFPRImIBOLIi ARCWIECf: Aiiiiieol HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS 31512 SNOWBALL ROAD PENGILLY, MN 55715 651-6310200 OFFICE 21B-929 9111 BRIANWHOU WMANQYAHOO.COM Ima mmlmBm a� mllmF/Ef1�SImPamml m�umwm�alm ■amermrM mi.. 1s mt FM PROJECT LOCATION. PAISLEY PARK 1501 MN 553 ANBuA �7 CbMssSen, N 55317 BUILDING MANAGER: ESTATE OF PRINCE ROGERS NELSON CD BREMER TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCMnOx 1100 WEST ST. GERMAN ST, ST. CLOUD. MN 56302 j B96ML60mmcTOR: I _ TO K DETERMINED I _ NOR THIS SET OF RAMS IS FOR A DESIGN -BUILD PROJECT. ANY INFORMATION NOT CURIFIEO BY MANUFACTURER PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OR DUMB ON THIS PLAN SET ARE .NT EDGE OF NDMw TO BE DETERMINED _ SEE SITE PLAN BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ANDME OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PUNS AND FIELD CONDITIONS WHICH REQUIRE AFILI e/s Ml DDOP IDDRONNARE CONTRACTOR TO CHOOSE ro waac PROPERLv ONE METHOD, DIMENSION OR MATERIAL OVER ANOTHER ARE TO �_ cExTRAL STATKNI I xnw9) BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF ME ARCHITECT BEFORE WORK 1 STARTED, FOR CLARIFICATION. xex REVIEW SET 9-13.16 MAIN FLOOR PERMIT SET ONLY -9.2416 m WALK THRU COMMENTS 10-16 CITY COMMENTS 11-2416 ® REVIEW EXHIBIT HALLOCCB 12.1416 CITY COMMENTS 12.2416 �7 m 3o BASEMENT S SAC AEOETERMINAAMINATNHI 2-2417 J V �'ls.0✓s-moDls JOB# 14136 C'�E GATE 9.1316 ; � ® F OPPOSE P °W DRAWN NH OFFICE OFFICE Ewl CHECKED ON MAIN FLOOR _- PLAN A2.0 nBASEMENT FLOOR PLAN _ �%A :3J02'=ro NORTH E BASEMENT TOTAL S.F. = 10,031 S.F. 1 I ,wwFl r� T NO BASEMENT - SLAB IS FLOOR ON GRADE I I xoRnSIT j' ¢FVAran;i.. r V 1 � ^ i 1)� ,JMay. VAULT [7B b58i. THE EGG IEE SHEET A2.3 ANNn CJ HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS 31572 SNOWBALL ROAD PENGILLY, MN 56775 651 631 GM OFFICE 216-9299171 BRIANWHOUWMAN®YAHOO.COM I®1 W'n II1V naiRaBBfalMaAaa7 ��a®nM�al�asaBBa� saaesq�Io��E� aatvSa BMI m aw PROJECT LWAM 61 PAISLEY PARK 7801 Audubon Rd. CbanOassm. MN 55317 BUILDING MANAGER'. ESTATE OF PRINCE ROGERS NELSON 4o BREMER (RUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 1100 WEST ST. GERMAIN ST. ST. CLOUD, MN 58302 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: TO BE DETERMINED B/IC THIS SET OF PLANS IS FOR A DESIGN -BUILD PROJECT. ANY INFORMATION NOT CLARIFIED BY MANUFACTURER PERFORMANCE REGUIREMENTS OR DETAILS ON THIS PUN SET ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PUNS AND FIELD CONDITIONS WHICH REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO CHOOSE ONE METHOD, DIMENSION OR MATERIAL OVER ANOTHER ME TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT BEFORE WORK IS STARTED, FOR CLARIFICATION. REVIEW SET 9.13.16 MAIN FLOOR PERMIT SET ONLY - 9.28-16 WALK THRU COMMENTS 10.4.16 CITY COMMENTS 11-29.16 REVIEW EXHIBIT HALL OCCS 12-14-16 CITY COMMENTS 12.26-16 BASEMENT&'EGG' _ _1.17.17 SAC REDETERMINATION 2-M17 /' JOBS 16.136^^�'� DATE 9.13-15 DRAWN NH CHECKED BH BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN A2.01 G1 THE EGG IEE SHEET A2.3 ANNn CJ HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS 31572 SNOWBALL ROAD PENGILLY, MN 56775 651 631 GM OFFICE 216-9299171 BRIANWHOUWMAN®YAHOO.COM I®1 W'n II1V naiRaBBfalMaAaa7 ��a®nM�al�asaBBa� saaesq�Io��E� aatvSa BMI m aw PROJECT LWAM 61 PAISLEY PARK 7801 Audubon Rd. CbanOassm. MN 55317 BUILDING MANAGER'. ESTATE OF PRINCE ROGERS NELSON 4o BREMER (RUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 1100 WEST ST. GERMAIN ST. ST. CLOUD, MN 58302 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: TO BE DETERMINED B/IC THIS SET OF PLANS IS FOR A DESIGN -BUILD PROJECT. ANY INFORMATION NOT CLARIFIED BY MANUFACTURER PERFORMANCE REGUIREMENTS OR DETAILS ON THIS PUN SET ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PUNS AND FIELD CONDITIONS WHICH REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO CHOOSE ONE METHOD, DIMENSION OR MATERIAL OVER ANOTHER ME TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT BEFORE WORK IS STARTED, FOR CLARIFICATION. REVIEW SET 9.13.16 MAIN FLOOR PERMIT SET ONLY - 9.28-16 WALK THRU COMMENTS 10.4.16 CITY COMMENTS 11-29.16 REVIEW EXHIBIT HALL OCCS 12-14-16 CITY COMMENTS 12.26-16 BASEMENT&'EGG' _ _1.17.17 SAC REDETERMINATION 2-M17 /' JOBS 16.136^^�'� DATE 9.13-15 DRAWN NH CHECKED BH BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN A2.01 araarToerAae®aY r, ,2ND FLOOR PLAN SGALE:3W =1'0' GENERAL MOTE: THMFI ORNK)F I UDEDINM ECT GROUP A3 - MUSEUM B11 MFLOOR %L2w G�NOR H ''��E r�iDTllll_I�H—.17 7 li SIORME pEM'rE BATX lIM Z r l _'MA>asroancoAmAn,� 2-0 REMOVE SHOWERS m aFaroeaav Drlswm W OFSHTO Y c N DDM W HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS 31572 SNOWBALL ROAD PENGILLY, MN 55175 651-631-0200 OFFICE 218-929-9171 BPJANWHOUWMAN60YAHOO.COM IT_It9'PrrIlRNrf_�iPn '. All raernu�MaQ�� rriMrFuaa�m�n[w rI1M_P! _rra aaersan rm r 1?N PROJECT LOCATION: PAISLEY PARK 7801 AaBNhon U. Chaahaeeen. MN 55317 BUILDING MANAGER: ESTATE OF PRINCE ROGERS NELSON Vh BREMER TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 1100 WEST ST. GERMAIN ST, ST. CLOUD, MN 56302 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: TOIEDETERMINED THIS SET OF PLANS IS FOR A DESIGN -BUILD PROJECT. ANY INFORMATION NOT CLARIFIED BY MANUFACTURER PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OR DETAILS ON THIS PUN SET ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PUNS AND FIELD CONDITIONS WHICH REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO CHOOSE ONE METHOD, DIMENSION OR MATERIAL OVER ANOTHER ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT BEFORE WORN IS STARTED. FOR CURIFICATION. REVIEW SET 9-13.16 O MAIN THRID PERMIT SET ONLY -9.28.16 WALK THAUCOMMEMS 10-41fi CITY COMMENTS 11.29-16 REVIEW EXHIBIT HALLOCC'S 121416 CITY COMMENTS 12.26-16 BASEMENT &'EGG' j SAC REDETERMINATION 2.16.17 JOB# 16-136DATE 9-1 DRAWN NH3-16 �1 CHECKED BH 2ND FLOOR PLAN A2.1 MIT I -T _ —UP pIIIIl01� % o *MAIN FLOOR MUSEUM ROUTE PLAN _ � UscuE:3rJr=ra 'fir E Eli GENERAL NOTES: ARROWS INDIGM MUSEUM PE ES1 tPAFFIC ftOUi ��LLL ALTO ROCK CFF {MIS i0 MJ9flY FINISH J FINISH OPEN PUBLIC JANUARY 2017 8 11 >01�-�m Iffi e vo ARDMTE� - HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS 31572 SNOWBALL ROAD PENGILLY, MN 55775 651 E31.0200 OFFICE 218-929-9171 BR W2WHOUWMAN(j9YAH00.CO M I�sr�snreo®Memo ■LI ,"OSS■NN■NNATe �iSTAI®BOIQ�IIEI.■I KNOWN RAm®l NM Rt M■ PROJECT LOCATION: PAISLEY PARK 7801 Audubon R0. CN■WmF■A MN 55317 BUILDING MANAGER: ESTATE OF PRINCE ROGERS NELSON d0 BREMER (RUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 1100 WEST ST. GERMAIN ST. ST. CLOUD, MM 56302 GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO BE DETERMINED Sim - -- THIS SET OF PLANS IS FOR A DESIGN -BUIL) PROJECT. ANY INFORMATION NOT CLARIFIED BY MANUFACTURER PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OR DETAILS ON THIS PIAN SEF ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PUNS AND FIELD CONDITIONS WHICH REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO CHOOSE ONE METHOD, DIMENSION OR MATERIAL OVER ANOTHER ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHRECT BEFORE WORK IS STARTED, FOR CLARIFICATION. REVIEW SET 913.16 START MAIN FLOOR PERMIT SET ONLY- 9.28.16 WALK THRU COMMENTS 10-4-16 CITY COMMENTS 11.2916 REVIEW EXHIBIT HALL OCCS 12-14.16 CITY COMMENTS 12.26-16 BASEMENT &'EGG' 1.4711. SAC REDETERMINATION 24117 JOB# 16.136 -^ DATE 9.13-16 DRAWN NH CHECKED BH MUSEUM PEDESTRIAN ROUTE A2.2 Loj "TH,U99- BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN SC H 8 NOIETH E INTERIOR AREA OF ELLIPSE S.F.=3,462 S.F. 'THE EGG' + TUNNEL = 3,960 S.F. GENERAL NOTES: INTERIOR BUILD OUT WAS NOT COMPLETED IN -THE EGG-. NO ROOMSORSTAIRS. REMOVE E CAP SANITARY SEWER TO'TNE EGG' I I I I II w2 ,"THE EGG" MAIN FLOOR PLAN $CALE:3FST=T41' TOTAL MAIN FLOOR =U74 S.F. w S� NORTH E "THE EGG" MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN _ w NORTH X7.3 SCALE: IAT=1'-0' E APPROXIMATE MEZZANINE = NO SF. MCMIBD HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS 31572 SNOWBALL ROAD PENGILLY, MN 55775 651-6310200 OFFICE 218-929-9171 BRIANWHOUWMAN®YAHOO.COM I�IOa71��11aBFNKiMw M�ai7KNw MWFWIMA IaAOA®M\MIMI MIS, 11 FEMBFEOLUM Fm PAISLEY PARK 7801 AIW bw R0. cbMYuw, FEM 55577 BUILEMIM WArAGM ESTATE OF PRINCE ROGERS NELSON W. BREMER MUST, RATIONAL ASSOCIATION JIM WEST ST. GERMAIN ST. R. CLOUD, MN 55302 MMSK WNIRKfOR: TO M DEn3N MOD? THIS SEF OF PUNS IS FOR A DESIGN -BUIL) PROJECT. ANY INFORMATION NOT CURIFIED BY MANUFACTURER. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OR DETAILS ON THIS PUN SET ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ME OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS WHICH REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO CHOOSE ONE METHOD. DIMENSION OR MATERIAL OVER ANOTHER ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF ME ARCHITECT BEFORE WORK IS STARTED, FOR CLARIFICATION. REVIEW SET 9.13.16 MAIN FLOOR PERMIT SET ONLY - 9-28.16 WALK THRU COMMENTS 10-4.16 CITY COMMENTS 11.29.16 REVIEW EXHIBIT HALLOCC'S 12-14.16 CITY COMMENTS 12.26-16 BASEMENT 6'EGG' 1.17.17 SAC REDETERMINATION 2.28.17 JOB# 16.136 DATE 9.13-16 DRAWN NH CHECKED BH "THE EGG" FLOOR PLAN A2.3 PAISLEY PARK SCOPE OF PROJECT: CODE REVIEW FOR FACILITY PHASE 1 - CHANGE OCCUPANCY TO A3 MUSEUM 9-28-16 PHASE 2 - REVIEW EXHIBIT HALL OCCUPANCY AND TEMPORARY TENT WITH SEATING 12-1416 PHASE 3 - ADD BASEMENT S "RIE EGG- PLANS 1-17-17 sECTroN,ao7 sTRucnniAL-NO crwic,Es SECTION 1 006 ELECTRICK. ro BE gENEw6D BY ELELigIG4 COMTRACT00.1F NEW WORN l4 PERFORMED. SECTIQY ta09 MECIINIIPN-aEC1VHbILCCN1AAClplro IEVIEW E%ISTWGSYSIEM fOq TEWAIOCgpANCy-DDDR( EXISTING AS nEEOEp... GTKN11010 RUMBING- RBIdA'ENLFAIRINq SECTION SIG SIGNAGE TOILE DESIGNATIONS ROOM NUMBERS a ARE.I0R51GN31 ACCESSNc TOILET ROOMS, ROOM NUMBERS a NALE3, EXTERIOR ACCESS I ACCESSIB-EFOMFOINEWS FOLLOWS: 1. SET SIGNAL PASSENGER LOPIDrvG ZONE - LOCATION EAT MAIN E4TRgryCE pENGPNG SLOPED SIDEWALK LOCATION ACCESSIBLE 2. ACCESSIBLETOILETS- WHERENOT P11ROOMS AREOFIND IBIE SIGNAGEA SET SIGNAGE AT NONCCESSIBLE (QUIETS WIiEgE TO FIND ACCESSIBLE PROJECT LOCATION WE NO SCALE S SHEETINDEX SHEET A1.0 REVIEW HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS SET $40.16 PROJECT INFORNATIONVSITE PLAN INCLUDED Pt9tlMT SET 941416 INCLUDEI A77 OCCUPANT LOAD/ SEATNG PLAN WA WA A2.0 MAIN FLOOR PLAN INCLUDED INCLUDEI A2.01 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN WA WA A2.1 2ND FLOOR PLAN INCLUDED INCLUDE. A22 MUSEUM PEDESTRIAN ROUTE INCLUDED 94CtUDEI A23 RHE EGG' FLOOR PLANS WA WA PROJECT DESCRIPTION MAEeOTA� GODS -pts CXAPIgL10 fIMHNEOFDCgIpµCy; t1_F A mai 0Cq.4�NCver{Jb+IgBE.BpIHY61 `— NEW OCGIIPNICY CATERER/MJSEVMFgi ENTRE NMN RLp1\-dp ROLTI-Ri1L8 aNFOENAsd \ DSFS-HO SEpAMTONOFOCCUPANCIESREOQIRED 46Y9C5WANCY'AVIOT NOREfW)A�Ug T1Uq THE CUBING �_.�l'� -RMSE2R IFWOF EXHIBITHALL-GW.IGEp OCCIRNM.Y roAt WBEW 1001ACERTIFICATE TIN OFOCCUPANCYREE,M NTIENACXNNGE OF OIXTFNNCYOCNgS PROJER REQUIRES ION FOR REy1EW SECTION tFIRE PROTECTION IONN.t EXISTING FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM TO BE REVIEWED BY FIRE NpTEC11pN ENGWEEq Epi HETI aC1006ME I' 1005, tp'LS MEANS OF EGRESS 1005.1 MEANS SHEET A2.0-OUFECGRP ESSTOHBERWEVAIEWOEN- ORSIAMOD INdMUE EUME OUEXR6NW INOMDVKRWNIS0 vERN9WWpN(T$ a NOT ED CN BECTACC "15MI,Md TAAE EIWJBJL p15 MINNESOTAACCESSIBILITYIWIN. BE REVIEWED 2 AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENT RANCE-RIWECT MEETS ENTRANCE? 2. AT NCTIO ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM IR HENT THROUGH BVH MUS ENTRANCE TO PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA -PROJECT MTE,2ND FITOOR EM INCLUDED MUSEUM MUSEUM PATH NOTE ON PIENGE3 NOTE: zn ORWRNETBLE INLWDFDINPROJECT REQUIRES TME ]. SIGNAGE FIXi ACCE$$ISLE PARKING d ACCESSIBLE RWM$-PRWECT REQUIRE$ SIGNS SET AT ROOMS NOTED ON RWA2 N. AT UEBSIBIEPARKINGREGUTASSEPROJECTDIN ZONE EOPARKING NOTED L ON511£PLAN 5. AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLEPASSENGER LOADINGZONEWHENPROVIGMLOPINGZONE ACCEBSIBLEAT INN ENIRAIJCE 8.AT OLE15TONE AOLEETRAEROUTE OECTE NGACCESSIBLE PA)MOMANO ACCESSIBLEpgSSENGER LOADING ZONES TO PN ACCESSIBLE ENTgµGE. PROJECT Hq5 SLOPED SICEWALt FROM ORALE LPNETO ENRCViCE- 3OFEUSIOEWALIKLESSTTWICINHEIGHT-NONAN LFLEW.REDFORRNAP-CURRENRYNOHANDRAILSREQUIRED 7, AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE FAMILY ORASSISTED-USE TOILET ROOM OR SEPAAATEACCESSIBLE MENENVOMENS TOILET ROOMS LOCATED ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. PROTECT MEETS REQUIREMENT WITH SEPARATE ACCESSIBLE MENSWOMENB TOILET ROOMS AT WEST ENTPANCE P q PROPOSED FUTURE PARKING I 3FXISTING ACCESSIBLE 36 PARKI STALL$ &I b PANKINGSTAtL3W/ACCESS V PN NTE➢ ON 0.5PWLLT. ® MEPD Cf EACH STALL gQ 6 I EXIST.. ACCESSIBLE PMgNG STA115...as AISLE PAINTED ON ASPHALT, SIGNAGE 0 HEAD OF EACH STAll 111 ACCESYBI£ENTNAN4£. MOPED LN IS LESS THAN T IN HEIGHT DWULSREWIRED-CLEARY TN ATN ROM SIDEWALK SURFACE ;ROUP S-2 - STORAGE BASEMENT BIgW EXLTITNO F100RNYINA _TIME_ _ 1,11Ai8 I.I SAC PHASE 2 WORK BASEMENT 6 WALK CITY NOTED ON "THE EGG" THRY COMMENT PLANS EXHIBIT PLAN 104.16 S11-29-16 HALL PERMIT VERIFIED _ SET 12-11-16 1.17.17 INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED WA INCLUDED INCLUDED _ INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED WA WA INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED WA INCLUDED INCLUDED INCLUDED WA INCLUDED WA WA INCLUDED INCLUDED MAEeOTA� GODS -pts CXAPIgL10 fIMHNEOFDCgIpµCy; t1_F A mai 0Cq.4�NCver{Jb+IgBE.BpIHY61 `— NEW OCGIIPNICY CATERER/MJSEVMFgi ENTRE NMN RLp1\-dp ROLTI-Ri1L8 aNFOENAsd \ DSFS-HO SEpAMTONOFOCCUPANCIESREOQIRED 46Y9C5WANCY'AVIOT NOREfW)A�Ug T1Uq THE CUBING �_.�l'� -RMSE2R IFWOF EXHIBITHALL-GW.IGEp OCCIRNM.Y roAt WBEW 1001ACERTIFICATE TIN OFOCCUPANCYREE,M NTIENACXNNGE OF OIXTFNNCYOCNgS PROJER REQUIRES ION FOR REy1EW SECTION tFIRE PROTECTION IONN.t EXISTING FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM TO BE REVIEWED BY FIRE NpTEC11pN ENGWEEq Epi HETI aC1006ME I' 1005, tp'LS MEANS OF EGRESS 1005.1 MEANS SHEET A2.0-OUFECGRP ESSTOHBERWEVAIEWOEN- ORSIAMOD INdMUE EUME OUEXR6NW INOMDVKRWNIS0 vERN9WWpN(T$ a NOT ED CN BECTACC "15MI,Md TAAE EIWJBJL p15 MINNESOTAACCESSIBILITYIWIN. BE REVIEWED 2 AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENT RANCE-RIWECT MEETS ENTRANCE? 2. AT NCTIO ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM IR HENT THROUGH BVH MUS ENTRANCE TO PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA -PROJECT MTE,2ND FITOOR EM INCLUDED MUSEUM MUSEUM PATH NOTE ON PIENGE3 NOTE: zn ORWRNETBLE INLWDFDINPROJECT REQUIRES TME ]. SIGNAGE FIXi ACCE$$ISLE PARKING d ACCESSIBLE RWM$-PRWECT REQUIRE$ SIGNS SET AT ROOMS NOTED ON RWA2 N. AT UEBSIBIEPARKINGREGUTASSEPROJECTDIN ZONE EOPARKING NOTED L ON511£PLAN 5. AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLEPASSENGER LOADINGZONEWHENPROVIGMLOPINGZONE ACCEBSIBLEAT INN ENIRAIJCE 8.AT OLE15TONE AOLEETRAEROUTE OECTE NGACCESSIBLE PA)MOMANO ACCESSIBLEpgSSENGER LOADING ZONES TO PN ACCESSIBLE ENTgµGE. PROJECT Hq5 SLOPED SICEWALt FROM ORALE LPNETO ENRCViCE- 3OFEUSIOEWALIKLESSTTWICINHEIGHT-NONAN LFLEW.REDFORRNAP-CURRENRYNOHANDRAILSREQUIRED 7, AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE FAMILY ORASSISTED-USE TOILET ROOM OR SEPAAATEACCESSIBLE MENENVOMENS TOILET ROOMS LOCATED ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. PROTECT MEETS REQUIREMENT WITH SEPARATE ACCESSIBLE MENSWOMENB TOILET ROOMS AT WEST ENTPANCE P q PROPOSED FUTURE PARKING I 3FXISTING ACCESSIBLE 36 PARKI STALL$ &I b PANKINGSTAtL3W/ACCESS V PN NTE➢ ON 0.5PWLLT. ® MEPD Cf EACH STALL gQ 6 I EXIST.. ACCESSIBLE PMgNG STA115...as AISLE PAINTED ON ASPHALT, SIGNAGE 0 HEAD OF EACH STAll 111 ACCESYBI£ENTNAN4£. MOPED LN IS LESS THAN T IN HEIGHT DWULSREWIRED-CLEARY TN ATN ROM SIDEWALK SURFACE ;ROUP S-2 - STORAGE BASEMENT BIgW EXLTITNO F100RNYINA _TIME_ _ 1,11Ai8 I.I SAC PIV.NE2-T RESUBMIT I 24477 .$ O INCLUDED WA INCLUDED INCLUDED AAA (I% cawN BWAYTRARIG z 31�W AID �. E1'a30'V 8 0 SITE INFORMWT C I REO111RED PARXING AUDITORIUM - I STAU. MR Ban S.F. - 11.610 SF. -25 STALLS MUSEUM . 1 STALL PER SCCA SF.- D.B9a 5F.• Ad STALLS OFFICE .5STALLS PER IM SF. -5]W BY. ^9u=E STALLS TOTAL NUMBER OF REWIRED PAR M AW STALLS • M 14 IEp1%✓® TO BE ACCESS. W E SHE PLAN DESIGN BY OTFERSI ONYEWAYd PARLpIG S-2 - STORACE `- TIE EGG - Rwmex-a-1N.,8 RETrlw E]pBIT IwL..ILBer B TEwoRARr TENT. E%IBIf IMIl-LNAFNLEaocpsALNcv roti LsuSETAt P1NAg i -1-n-1 r. vc FLEW a6eNm N¢IAE BI W pEMT AIDE HIP FlDOR RAMS R®ETMLMMTIM-}i1 : _... i EEBE aMBN flO0Rh1aBIM_1M R(BgVE E%ISIIA NYJYI BB BOON RCQYp1AN8NM8BBIf ARCHITECT:: AAelo` HOUWMAN ARCHITECTS 31572 SNOWBALL ROAD PENGILLY, MN 55775 651-631-0200 OFFICE 218-9299171 aN,E"IP1IalEm�wiM16� nW1 mB�MM811 V %T,N MB MTiNISIa®i�Rlap 611EIBhf® ME PROJECT LV -MM t] PAISLEY PARK 7801 Audubon Rd, Chanhassen, MN 55317 801 MING MANAGER ESTATE OF PRINCE ROGERS NELSON c/o BREMER MUST, RATIONAL ASSOCIATION 1100 WEST ST. GERNAIN ST. ST. CLOUD, MN 56302 GENERA. CONTRACTOR, TO BE DETERMINED NOTE: THIS SET OF PUNS IS FOR A DESIGN BUILD PROJECT. ANY INFORMATION MR CLARIFIED BY MANUFACTURER PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OR DETAILS ON THIS PUN SET ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ANDTHE OWNER. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS WHICH REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO CHOOSE ONE METHOD, DIMENSION OR MATERIAL OVER ANOTHER ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENRQN OF THE ARCHITECT BEFORE WORK IS STARTED, FOR CLARIFICATION. REVIEW SET 9.13.16 MAIN FLOOR PERMIT SET ONLY - 9.28.16 WALK THRU COMMENTS 10.4.16 CITY COMMENTS 11.29-16 REVIEW EXHIBIT HALLOCC'S 12-14.16 CITY COMMENTS 12.26.16 BASEMENT &'EGG' 1.17.17 SAC REDETERMINATION 2-28.17 JOB# 16.136 DATE 9.13.16 DRAWN NH CHECKED BH PROJECT INFO. SITE PLAN A1.0 AS • STAR TRIBUNE TUESDAY, AUGUST 30, 2016 Editorials Editorials represent the institutional voice of the Star Tribune. They are researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom StarTribune MICHAEL J. KLINGENSMITH, Publisher and CEO SCOTTGII.LFSPIE, Editor, Editorial Pages A hard -to -stomach exercise in freedom An NFL quarterback's recent sideline protest is a reminder that for all of the beauty of the principles enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, the exercise of them in real life can often be offensive. On Friday, Colin Kaepernick of the San Francisco 49ers refused to stand for the national anthem before a game, saying he would not "show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color." His action, which garnered headlines and understandable ire, is another in the long tradition of athletes leveraging their sports spot- light to make a statement. The "Black Power" salute during the 1968 Olympics medal ceremony may well be the most memorable of these moments. And Muhammad Ali refused to fight in Vietnam, a decision he defended by decrying racism. Kaepernick's protest is a textbook example of a citizen exercising the freedom of expression that the First Amendment guarantees every American. He also did not violate NFL policy, which encourages rather than requires players to stand for "The Star-Spangled Banner." And yet, his protest felt like a kick in the gut to many. Here is someone who has become unbelievably wealthy in a sys- tem he is now decrying. His right to criticize that system — a right that should not be questioned — has nevertheless been paid for in blood many times over by those who fought for our nation. Although the mil- itary defends our values and our people — not a song or a flag — it was still stomach -churning for many Americans to watch Kaepernick dis- respect these two treasured symbols. One of the greatest achievements of this country is that freedoms aren't reserved only for the wealthy or powerful. That means fans are free to have an opinion and, in turn, that means Kaepernick will have to face the consequences ofhis action. That's likely to include lost endorse- ments, less lucrative contacts and, yes, some serious booing when the 49ers go on the road. The quarterback is lucky that his team's schedule doesn't include the Philadelphia Eagles, whose fans are notorious for their brutal razzing of opposing athletes. But a cautionary note for Kaepernick's critics is in order as the con- troversy continues. It's fine to express opinions on social media or in news story comments. But it's important to do so in a civil manner. The digital age's new public forums regrettably have brought out the worst in some people. Facebook reaction to the Star Tribune's Kaepernick story included profanity, a call for him to be deported and a number of people saying they hoped he'd be injured. Whether it's the Kaepernick protest or the political news of the day, no discussion is served by spitefulness or personal attacks. The Star Tribune and other media companies employ moderators to keep com- menters civil on their websites. But self -policing on social media, espe- cially with this fall's election, is also in order. If you wouldn't want your mom to see it, don't post it. Paisley Park museum is a perfect tribute One of Prince's last goals will come to pass after all. His home and studio complex, Paisley Park, will open as a museum in October, a fit- ting tribute to a man who left a giant impact that stretched beyond the world of music. Tours ofthe 65,000 -square -foot estate willbegin Oct. 6, allowing those who buy tickets priced from $38.50 to $100 to view the recording studios, rehearsal areas and other work spaces used by Prince from the time he opened Paisley Park in the late -1980s until his death in April at age 57. Paisley Park occupies a unique place in the hearts of Minnesota fans. A hometown son, Prince built his career in Minnesota and never left. Wherever in the world he traveled, home was always Chanhassen, where he would rest, regenerate, create and "FOR LOVE IS THE COLOR periodically reward faithful fans by THIS PLACE IMPARTS opening up the park for impromptu (PAISLEY PARK). parties and jam sessions. ADMISSION IS EASY, JUST SAY YOU BELIEVE AND That makes Paisley Park different COME TO THIS PLACE IN evenfrom places like Graceland. Elvis YOUR HEART." Presley and his extended clan lived at From"Paisley Park" by Prince the Memphis estate for years, but it was not where Presley created most of his music. Paisley Park embodied Prince's artistic spirit — from the studios where he rehearsed to the vaults where he kept unreleased works. Close friends said that Prince long had a vision of Paisley Park as a museum and that he had spent years gathering memorabilia from a decadeslong career that included seven Grammys, a Golden Globe Award and an Academy Award. What he did not do was create a will, which for a time appeared to leave his vision in jeopardy. But now Prince's family is working with the city of Chanhassen, where Mayor Denny Laufenburger has said he believes "the plans for Paisley Park are in full accordance with Prince's wishes:' That is a welcome out- come from the tragic drug overdose death that took the artist far too early. It is hoped that the family, in addition to offering public tours, will at some point make the studios available for music education and men- toring. Part of Prince's legacy is the work he did to nurture other art- ists and mentor young performers. That work should go on, and there should be a place for it at Paisley Park Readers Write BEN MARGOT • Associated Press San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepemick (shown at a news conference) refused to stand for the national anthem before a preseason game on Friday. "I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color," he told NFL Media. PATRIOTISM Sit down — and shut up? Hey, Colin Kaepernick, is that all you got? ("49ers QB uses anthem to state his race case," Aug. 28.) Sitting in a chair is your contribution to the "oppressed" or the "voice- less"? How generous. Disrespecting the flag of your country that allows you to disrespect its flag is not an act of bravery or courage. It's the act of a buffoon. Many of those who condemn Kaepernick claim his action was disrespectful ofthe militaryand thus unpatriotic. Unfortunately, this betrays a sad igno- rance ofthe meaning of America by those claiming to be its patriotic defenders. The founders had a profound mistrust and fear of standing armies as the greatest threat to liberty. This is reflected in the Second Amendment to the Constitution, much lauded today, which was added to keep the federal government from breaking up the state militias in favor of a standing army. In addition, the Third Amendment forbids forcing people to let soldiers stay in their homes, which the British army had done in America After the Civil War, the huge army that fought the war was mostly dismantled as unnecessary for a country with no global imperial interests to defend. The 14th and 15th Amendments were adopted to guarantee equality before the law for all people, regardless of race. Since this guarantee today is still not in practical effect throughout the nation, gestures to remind the public of this shortcoming are a necessary ele- ment of true patriotism to American ideals. The uncritical robot -patriotism ofKaepernick's critics should not be mistaken for the real thing. JEFF MILLER Minneapolis CLINTON FOUNDATION Shut it down, says Star Tribune Editorial Board. In that case ... Ifthe Star Tribune Editorial Boardwants to shut down the Clinton Foundation because of the pos- sible appearance ofimpropriety (Aug. 28), Iwould like to know what the Star Tribune and its parent company plan to do, in practical terms, to replace the good that is being done by the foundation. Spe- cifically, what is the Star Tribune going to do to: • Help provide AIDS/HIV medication to 6.8 mil- lion people living with that disease? • Help more than 200,000 subsistence farmers around the world produce enough crops to actu- ally create markets? • Provide 50,000 cataract surgeries in Peru? • Replace the $88 billion in capital investments that willmake a significant increase in good -paying jobs around the world, including 10,000 jobs in America? • Provide 225 kilowatts of free solar energy for schools in Haiti, the poorest country in the West - em Hemisphere? In short, former President Bill Clinton, who is not running for any office, has been doing what our country used to do at the federal government level tohelp emerging countries aroundthe world instead of bombing them back to the Stone Age. And the EditorialBoard thinks none ofthose prag- matic ends is worth the potential for favoritism. Maybe the Editorial Board could sell some of the arrogance that is certainly taking up a lot of space in that ivory tower. JEREMY POWERS, Minneapolis SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL Perhaps a court case over equal protection would be in order Do we have the makings of a lawsuit over South- west light rail? It seems to me that throwing hun- dreds ofmillions at roads,year afteryear, anddeny- ing $144 million for light rail meanthat people who can afford cars (whites) are beinglavishly attended to,while minorities who lack their own transporta- tion to get to new job vacancies are not. This is so discriminatory and"irrational" (a legal distinction) that a case should be made for the court ordering light rail to happen. How can the state segregate minorities largely into one area of Minneapolis, then deny themthemear s to leave that segregated area to get to needed employment? This is what disparities are made of. The Legislature can't argue that light rail doesn't pay when ridership exceeds expectations. And it can't fairly grouse about costs when cars cost so much more per rider -mile, even though we pay little or no attention to the latter. It's simply not fair, and that's what equal protection lawsuits are made of. MARY McLEOD, St. Paul The Aug. 27 editorial "Southwest LRT is well worth salvaging' continues to perpetuate the myth that the line will dramatically improve access for residents of north Minneapolis to jobs in the southwestern suburbs. While Southwest has been described as "a train to equity," that doesn't make DON EISENSCHENK, Minnetonka it so. Here are the equity -related facts: • Predictions (based on Metropolitan Council numbers) estimate that ridership at the three sta- tions "near" north Minneapolis (Penn, Van White and Royalston) would be fewer than 2,000 per day, or 9 percent of daily ridership. These stations at best skirt the heart of north Minneapolis • Most of these riders will be required to transfer from buses, because the stations are not within walking distance of their homes. A key to transit convenience (speaking as an almost -daily user) is walkability and, wherever possible, a one -seat ride. • Easy access to the 175,000 jobs near the pro- posed line could be made available starting next week (or nem month) if there were the will to do so. How? SouthWest Transit operates express buses to downtown Minneapolis on weekdays, and it could use the return trips to pick up riders at one or two key locations in north Minneapolis and drop them at two or three key employment hubs in the South- western suburbs. Transit thatincreases accesstotransit-dependent riders, such as residents of north Minneapolis, would be worth supporting. The Southwest line is not it — so please stop perpetuating the myth that it is a "train to equity." PATTY SCFIMrrz, Minneapolis The problem withplans for additional light-rail and transit funding is that everyone but the user is asked to pay more. The members ofthe Met Coun- cil (very few with private -sector backgrounds) seem to never consider reasonable and periodic fare increases that adjust with inflation. As long as I can remember, the fare has been from $1.75 to $2.25. During this period, the system has expanded allowing riders to go farther for the same low and heavily subsidized price (84 percent when capital recovery costs are properly included). Great news if you are a rider, but not so much for the rest of us 90 -plus percent who do not use the system regu- larly. There are many ways to increase user fund- ing that you do see in other metro -area systems, including fares that adjust with inflation, airport surcharges and charging for parking. Our transit leaders seem to have a deaf ear to all of these. I do see and support the overall vision and real- ize that it requires a substantial public subsidy of the transit system, but plans that do not seek addi- tional participation from the user are grossly unfair to the rest ofus and will further jeopardize a system that can work for all of us. STEVE LYON, Minnetonka STATE FAIR Room for improvement It has always been a joy to visit the Agriculture - Horticulture building at the Minnesota State Fair. The apple display, floral arrangements, seed art and bee exhibit are excellent. However, during the past few years, the displays have been crowded out due to the addition of craft beer sales. The integrityof the building has been lost! Perhaps there needs to be a new location for this popular activity. MARY JOHNSON, Delano This is the first year in 50 that I haven't been able to enjoy our wonderful fair. In fact, I worked there as a young student for the Star Tribune in its information booth. I remember many politicians visiting us. Now we have the party headquarters where the Republicans have again overstepped the boundaries ofdecencybyexhibiting former Secre- tary of State Hillary Clinton in a black -and -white prison jumpsuit. But what would we expect now of what was at one time called the Grand Old Party? A party that would deliver to us Donald Trump and all his insults. JUDY CRAWFORD, Wayzata YOUR VIEWS? We welcome your participation in these pages, whether in letters for the"Readers Write" section or' commentariesforthe"Opinion Exchange" page. The best wayto contribute is through the "submit a letter orcommentary'linkonour websit(,;dww .. startribune.com/opinion You can also s ubn dt by e-mailto opinion@startnbune.com. Submissions must be exclusive to us in Minnesota All must include the writer's real, legal name, address, occupation and phone numbers. Letters and rebuttals become the property ofthe Star Tribune and may be republished in arty format. Letters shouldbe brief, up to 250 words. Articles should be fewerthan 700 words. TUESDAY, AUGUST 30, 2016 STAR TRIBUNE • A7 Kidnapped aid worker is freed SYDNEY - An Australian aid worker who was kidnapped in Afghanistan and held for four months has beenreleased and is doing well, Australia's for- eign minister, Julie Bishop, said Monday. The aid worker, Kerry Jane Wilson, who is in her 60s and is also known as Katherine Jane, had been working in Afghani- stan for about 20 years and had most recently nun Zardozi, an organization that promoted the work of Afghan artisans, particularly women She was taken from her office in the eastern city of Jalalabad on the morning of April 28 by two armed men. Bishop did not provide fur- ther details of the conditions of Wilson's release, but in a written statement she thanked the authorities in Afghani- stan. She said Wilson's family had asked for privacy. "I am relieved for Kerry Jane, and her family, with whom I have remained in close contact," Bishop said. Attaullah Khogyani, a spokesman for the gover- nor of Nangarhar Province, whose capital is Jalalabad, confirmed the release. He said Wilson was freed in the city on Sunday "through the efforts of our national intel- ligence agency." Afghanistan's intelligence agency, the National Direc- torate of Security, said in a brief statement that its special forces had carried out a raid to free Wilson "In regards to the case, several suspects have been arrested and the investiga- tion is ongoing;" the state- ment said. Wilson's father, Brian Wil- son, who lives in Perth, Aus- tralia, told local news outlets in April that his daughter had set up a nonprofit organiza- tion to help empower women in Afghanistan. He was worried for her safety, he said, but his daugh- ter knew the risks and kept her head down "Do your level best and come back safe and sound," BrianWilson, 92, said through ABC News in Perth shortly after Kerry Jane Wil- son was abducted. The Australian govern- ment has said it does not pay ransom demands made by kid- nappers. NEW YORK TIMES ELIZABETH FLORES • eflores@startribune.com North High Principal Shawn Harris -Berry, left, gave Superintendent Ed Graff a tour. Enrollment has rebounded to about 400. New year, new hopes at North � SCHOOL from Al Superintendent Ed Graff said Friday as he whipped up enthu- siasm for Monday's launch Graff has been on the job just two months, the win- ner of a grinding search for a new leader dating to Janu- ary 2015. He joins a district that has been falling short of the academic expectations in its ambitious strategic plan and lagging in statewide test results released last month. Parents, school board mem- bers and the community are demanding change. North High is just one example of challenges ahead for Graff. If things had worked out differently, there might not have been a fust day of school at North this year. The district threatened to close the school in 2010 because of plummet- ing enrollment and lackluster academics. But four years since Harris - Berry took over and the school implemented specializedpro- grams, enrollment has grown dramatically. She pegs it to athletic and academic perfor- mance. She added that North didn't have a middle school that feeds into it until this year, which has contributed to a big ninth -grade class. Only 250 students were expected at the beginning of the summer. Now the count of about 400 will grow by Labor Day, the district said. There's a new academy in place this year, a project -based learning program around sci- ence, technology, engineering and math (STEM). The boys' basketball team, the Polars, took home the IA state champion- ship in the spring, and the fust football game is Friday. Tro- phies touting athletic achieve- ments pack award cases. In the morning, Harris - Berry directed Graff around the school as he greeted stu- dents and complimented the enrollment surge. "So what do we have out here?" Graff asked Harris - Berry, who was showing him around the school. "This is our courtyard. And so, we're actually a square, so you can't get lost," Harris - Berry said, explaining the school's layout, and perhaps something more. "Well, you can get lost, but you can always find your way." The new guy at school North is the city's oldest high school, and its existing building was built in 1973. When the community rose up against the plan to close North, the district poured money into saving it. Former Superintendent Bernadeia Johnson called in a consul- tant, and Harris -Berry drafted people she calls "experts" — teachers and staff. "It's like a once -in -a -career opportunity that you can actu- ally start a school," she said. Graff met Marquis Hollo- man, a16 -year-old senior who has dreams ofattending How- ard University. "I'll check back in," Graff said to him Though enrollment has increased, test scores haven't. Results from the state read- ing and math tests discussed at a school board committee meeting last week showed North had 7 percent profi- ciency on the math portion of the Minnesota Comprehen- sive Assessments and 5 per- cent proficiency in reading. The numbers were among the lowest of arty high school in the district Harris -Berry said those results are distorted by the high numbers of students opting out of the tests, something that has become increasingly popular in Minneapolis high schools. Only about 50 students took either test. She insisted that the students are doing well academically on classroom assessments. Numbers ofsmdents fmish- ing high school have picked up, too. Of 64 seniors in last year's class, 62 graduated on time, Harris -Berry said. Students there talk about college, some with sights on schools like Howard and Spelman College. Good things to corse It seemed appropriate that North was on the fust -day schedule for the new super- intendent. This year's student body is mostly freshmen, Har- ris -Berry said. During a midmorning pass- ing time, Graff walked up a hallway as kids flowed in and out, an unfamiliar figure who stuck out even more with his lanky figure and suit and tie. Students echoed greetings back to him. At North, he said he wants to continue to boost enroll- ment. Graff said he was impressed by students' aca- demic dreams and told seniors he's looking forward to seeing them onstage at graduation In his last classroom visit of the day at North, Graff spoke to a group of students in Courtney Bell's Introduction to African-American Studies class. "I can tell you that when people talk about Minneapolis, they think about North High School," he said. "So whatever you guys represent, how you act, how you achieve, that's what people are going to think about here in Minneapolis:' Beena Raghavendran• 612-673-4569 Wheaties box honors Phelps for lifetime achievement WHEATIBS from Al "It was special to watch someone who had experi- enced so much over the last four years come out of retire- ment and accomplish some- thing so incredible," said Dana McNabb, vice president of marketing for Wheaties. General Mills first put Phelps on its Wheaties box in 2004, after he won six gold medals, and again in 2012, after he won four. He won five in Rio. "The greatest athletes in the world have been on the Wheaties box," Phelps said Monday morning on NBC's "Today" show, where he sat next to a mock-up of the box. Wheaties boxes fust fea- tiiredan athlete, baseball slug - tLou Gehrig, in 1934. The ger t Olympian was diver Jane PAuntz in 1935. And the fust African-American was Jesse Owens in 1936. These days, the announce- ment of a new face of Wheat- ies brings outsized attention to a cereal that, for all its history, is a relatively small product at Golden Valley -based Gen- eral Mills. The company sold about $34 million worth of Wheaties in the United States in the latest July -to -June fis- cal retail year, according to IRP, a Chicago -based market research firm It sold just over $500 million worth of Honey Nut Cheerios, the country's biggest -selling cereal, in the same period. "It's unusual for a cereal to invest money in that kind of culture branding;' said Steve Wehrenberg, an advertising instructor at the University of Minnesota and former chief executive of Campbell Mit- hun, a Minneapolis agency now called Mithun. "This kind of image investment doesn't always work on a short-term basis but it might just get people to remember Wheaties exists:' The announcement comes as General Mills is fighting to maintain positive sales growth in its cereal business, its larg- est. The segment saw a 3 per- cent jump in the latest three- month reporting period after several quarters of decline. Originally called Wash - burn's Gold Medal Whole Wheat Flakes, Wheaties was General Mills' first ready -to - eat cereal in 1924. Consum- ers' breakfast preferences have changed over the years, veering away from cereal in favor of grab -and -go conve- nience options or more tra- ditional hot meals, like bacon and eggs. Wheaties is no lon- ger among General Mills' top cereal brands, but it maintains strong name recognition "In general, breakfast has become something differ- ent," said Sue Kruskopf, chief executive of Kruskopf & Co., a Minneapolis marketing agency. "Thegood thingabout Wheaties is that it strikes me as a natural -type cereal" Phelps' Lifetime Achieve- ment box should appear on store shelves within a few weeks. Wheaties boxes have long been sought out by collectors. But Kruskopf says cerealboxes have lost their cachet "There are probably still people who collect them, but those won't drive sales as much as consumers just liking the product;' she said. Kristen Leigh Painter • 612-673-4767 BILL POLO • Associated Press In 1981, Gene Wilder and his wife, Gilda Radner, starred in the film "Hanky Pantry," directed by Sidney Poitier. He brought comedic touch to neurotic roles A WILDER from Al to make him more subtle," Wilder once said. "His job was to make me more broad:' But sometimes Wilder brought important comic ideas to Brooks. While filming "Young Frankenstein" (1974), a tribute to Universal Studios horror movies of the 1930s, Wilder urged that he and Peter Boyle, who was playing the monster, tap-dance a duet to "Puffin' on the Ritz." Brooks objected to the number until a test audience reacted withhowls of laughter. In another era, Wilder's Harpo Marx -like mop of golden hair, his slight phy- sique and his soft, almost lisping voice might have hin- dered a career as a leading man. But Brooks once said he found Wilder "a natural... an Everymanwithallthe vulner- ability showing. One day God said, `Let there be prey,' and he created pigeons, rabbits, lambs and Gene Wilder." Brooks channeled the actor's wide-ranging comic talents into many types of roles. For the theatrical farce "The Producers" (1968), Wilder played an ultra - nervous accountant who becomes hysterical when his baby -blue security blanket is taken away. In the west- ern spoof `Blazing Saddles" (1974), Wilder played the other extreme as the Waco Kid, an alcoholic gunman whose draw is so quick that he disarms eight attackers. After an early Broadway career, Wilder debuted on- screen in a brief role as a kid- napped undertaker in "Bonnie and Clyde" (1967). Teaming with Brooks, Wilder's comic skills tended to overshadow his work as a director, writer and champi- onship fencer, all ofwhichhe displayed in"The Adventure of Sherlock Holmes' Smarter Brother" (1975). His other well-knownpor- trayals included the candy - maker who gleefully watches greedy children meet their just deserts in "Willy Wornka & the Chocolate Factory" (1971) and a doctor lovestruck with a sheep named Daisy in Woody Allen's "Everything You Wanted to Know About Sex But Were Afraid to Ask" (1972). With Pryor, Wilder made several comedies that broke ground in their interracial teaming, including "Silver Streak" (1976) and"Stir Crazy" (1980). Wilderpushedfor cast- ing Pryor to deflect cries of rac- ism in light of controversial material, such as the scene in "Silver Streak" in which Wilder applies shoe polish to his face and tries to"actblack" W ilder's career faded in the 1980s after making a series of undistinguished films, sev- eral co-starring his third wife, "Saturday Night Live" star Gilds Radner. After her death from ovarian cancer in 1989, Wilderco-wroteabookabout ovarian cancer and started a cancer support network Jerome Silberman was born in Milwaukee on June 11,1933. He later took his stage name from the playwright Thom - ton Wilder. His first name came from the main charac- ter of Thomas Wolfe's novel "Look Homeward, Angel;" although Wilder later wrote in a memoir that his psycho- analyst suggested another reason: His mother's name was Jeanne. He enrolled at the Actors Studio in New York, where he studied the "Method" style that asks performers to draw on personal memories in forming a character. After Army service in a psychiatric ward, Wilder appeared in sev- eral Broadway productions. His small role in "Mother Courage and Her Children" in 1963 proved crucial. Also in the show was Anne Ban- croft, whose then -boyfriend Brooks was a TV comedy writer struggling with a film script that became: "The Producers." MY MOTHER WAS ASNEAKER, MY FATHER WAS A DRESS SHOE I can't help it. I was born this way. Insanely comfortable and ready for a day in the office. Think of me as the Un-Sneaker. SAMUELHUBBARDTOM 30 colors, 9 styles, 1 free catalog. 844.482.4800 E6 - STAR TRIBUNE VARIETY SUNDAY, JANUARY 8, 2017 HOW SLOW CAN YOU GO? . Slow from El The Slow Movement isn't about shirking our responsibilities, but fmd- ing a lesshectic and more thoughtful way of doing things. Like making pasta sauce. That's how the Slow Movement began, back in 1986 when McDonald's wanted to open a fast-food franchise near Rome's famed Spanish Steps. Some Italians were appalled and gathered for a protest. But instead of waving signs, they passed a bowl of pasta. No to burgers, yes to Bolog- nese] Slow Food officially was founded in Italy three years later (took their time, right?) with the goal of nurtur- ing local food traditions and people's interest in where their food comes from. From its manifesto: "We are enslaved by speed and have all suc- cumbed to the same insidious virus: Fast Life, which disrupts our habits, pervades the privacy of our homes and forces us to eat Fast Foods. A fum defense of quiet material pleasure is the only way to oppose the universal folly of Fast Life." Granted, a little preachy. But its intentions were pure: to nurture con- viviality in cooking and sharing meals with others. Today, there are more than100,000 Slow Food members in chapters, or convivia, around the world. A movement without leaders The Slow Movement has no execu- tive director, no dues -paying mem- bers. It's spread by an array of blogs, Facebook pages and websites about the good life, the slow life, the exam- ined life. Yet the movement does have aper - suasive spokesperson in Carl Honore, a Canadian journalist now living in London who wrote a 2004 bestseller, "In Praise of Slow" Honore's TED talk has had more than2 million views. He has described the Slow Movement as "a loose and international effort by the harried and haggard to decelerate the pace of their lives:' While we think of pace in terms of fast or slow, Honor6 says that it's more ofa philosophy oflife. From his book "Fast is busy, controlling, aggres- sive, hurried, analytical, stressed, superficial, impatient, active, quan- tity -over -quality. Slow is the oppo- site: calm, careful, receptive, still, intuitive, unhurried, patient, reflec- tive, quality -over -quantity. It is about making real and meaningful connec- tions — with people, culture, work, food everything:' So how does this happen in daily life? Consider the premise ofMinne- apolis' Misfit Coffee, which operates out ofa food truck in the summer and at Izzy's Ice Cream in the winter. Its menu is clear. Craft coffees take any. where from three to five minutes to prepare. "You're going back in time," founder and owner Marcus Parkan- sky said of the pour -over process that revisits old, pre-Keurig techniques. The barista begins by wetting a cone of coffee grounds with a small amount of steaming water and letting the grounds "bloom" for at least 30 seconds. Then more water is poured on slowly and methodically, moving in concentric circles. This may take several minutes. Really. While waiting, a few customers revert to their phones, but not nearly as many as you'd think, Parkansky said Some chat with others in line, or with the barista pouring those concentric circles. Some people just savor the pause. "We like to offer this Zen -like expe- rience in the middle of the honking and sirens," Parkansky said. "Other times we'll be here in the coffee trailer, jamming out to some tunes, doing what we can do to change the atmosphere of people's days." He understands why coffee, and life, accelerated. "It's a matter of convenience. Everyone's lives got quicker with technology, with automobiles. With the amount oftasks that humans have to juggle year after year, century after century, it only makes sense to get faster." Yet once people have the experi- ence of finding time on their hands — even if it's only four unencumbered minutes — they get hooked. "First -timers might say,'Wow, why did I wait four minutes?' But then they come back, and they keep com- ing back," Parkansky said. "It's like a bell rings in their heads to come here and wait " Wekonung winter Come winter, some Minnesotans think they're poster children for the Slow Movement. And they're not happy. The end of daylight saving time plunges us into darkness. Tempera - Photoprovided At the Break Room, people can smash electronics with sledgehammers to let off a little steam. The Break Room Where: At Can Can Wonderland, 755 N. Prior AV, St. Paul. Opening: Jan. 20. More information: breakroommn.com tures fall, along with snow. We crave sun andbegmdgeice. Wewalkslower and drive slower and wake up reluc- tantly. If we bond, it's over whining about how slow winter is passing. It's a different matter in Tromso, a small Norwegian island north of the Arctic Circle where the Polar Night lasts from November to January. (To them, we might as well be in the Baha- mas. In 2015, a social psychologist wrote an article for the Atlantic about how the residents stave off seasonal depression and if those strategies could be applied elsewhere. What Kari Leibowitz discovered was that, far from dreading the slow, dark "days," residents embraced them as koselig, or Norwegian for "cozy." Candles were everywhere, in homes, cafes, even offices. The town glowed. Residents got outside to hike or to go to cabins or to ski to work. They gathered for potlucks. They threw festivals. Life moved more slowly, but it was no less fulfilling, and actually more fun than the summer months. Mostly, she learned, residents con- sidered the Polar Night "no big deal." The standard questionnaires she used regarding seasonal affective disorder were ineffective, because the ques- tionnaires asked only about negative outcomes, never positive ones. Leibowitz realized she was seeing the results of having the right mind- set. In brief, complaints fuel discon- tent. Enjoyment nurtures happiness. She was quick to note that people with clinical seasonal depression cannot "magically cure themselves by adjusting their mind -set:' Still, she wrote, "mind -set may play a role in seasonal well-being." One quick example: A friend refused to call the Polar Night the merketid, or "dark time." Instead she referred to it as the "Blue Time" for the luminous shades of blue that tinged the sky and snow and lights. Sure, it's January. But Blue Time sounds kind of cool. Finding the right speed Right about now, one word maybe lurking in your mind: Seriously? To parents of youngsters juggling hockey practice, homework proj- ects and hamburger patties, slowing down may seem a fantasy. To some- one holding down three jobs just to make rent, the idea of "decelerating, verges on precious. To anyone climb- ing a corporate ladder, the option of pausing sounds like lunacy. In "In Praise of Slow," Honore made the case that the Slow Move- ment doesn't mean' `doing everything at a snail's pace," but rather finding the right speed at which to do some- thing. "The movement is made up of people who want to live better in a fast -paced, modernworld," he wrote. In other words: Find the balance. "Be fast when it makes sense to be fast, and be slow when slowness is called for. Seek to live at what musicians call the tempo giusto — the right speed." Balance is something that Britt Udesen thinks about as executive director of the Loft Literary Center in Minneapolis. Because words help make thoughtful sense of a rapidly changing world there's a need to be both fast and slow. "One of the things that's so great about literature is that it's fast and responsive," Udesen said, "but also gives us the opportunity to sit with ideas and our thoughts:' A few years ago, the Loft was name - checked along with its neighbors, the Minnesota Center for Books Arts and Milkweed Editions, in a blog about the Slow Movement. A New York Times article told ofhow Washington Avenue, once primed be to a technol- ogy corridor, instead became home to these hooky groups that revitalized what had been a sketchy stretch of street. By the blogger's definition, slow wonl While Udesen doesn't align the Loft with the Slow Movement, she sees its value. "We're all trying to figure this out," she said of reconciling routines with reflection. "While it's true that when we're in line at Target half of us are on phones looking at pictures, there's also a huge movement toward medi- tation. "I mean, I'm aknitter, and it's inter- esting that that's become a trendy thing to do, a way to engage with materials," she said. She's right. Slow knitting is huge. So maybe there's something to sit- ting down witha ballof yam and a cup of pour -over coffee on a wintry blue Minnesota night. What could it hurt? Kim Ode • 612-673-7185 @Odewrites A short list of slow stuff Almost anything can be slow. The key component is giving a pursuit your full attention at the moment. (Sharing an activity with friends or being outdoors also is encouraged.) Here's a list of just some of the slowpursuits: • Slow hobbies: knitting, painting, woodworking gardening baking. • Slow travel: Traveling closer to home can be illuminating; if rang- ing further, staying in one place for a week instead of hopscotch- ing to a new destination each day. • Slow TV -the film loop of a blaz- ing yule log, of course, but also the 13 -hour Arby's commercial of a brisket cooking in a smoker, or Norway's seven -hour train journey, even Lagavulin distillery s 45 -minute video of actor Nick Offerman drinking scotch by a fire. • Slow fashion: making or buying garments for quality and longev- ity, or repurposing older clothing. Slow fashion also encourages fair wages, lower carbon footprints and (ideally) zero waste. • Slow relationships; taking time to savor, deepen and invigorate the important relationships in your life. • Slow exercise: combining work- ing out with time in nature or time with friends. • Slow parenting: guiding kids to experience the joys of free time and creativity. • Slow money: using your money for things that really matter and buying from within your com- munity. • Slow business: instead of multi- tasking focus on doing one thing at a time really well You'll prob- ably find that it will take less time than if you're juggling several tasks at once. • Slow journalism: A London quarterly magazine, Delayed Gratification, revisits the events of the previous three months to see what happened after the dust settled; the anti -Twitter. Reaching the breaking point . BREAK from EI The business officially opens inside ofCan CanWon- derland anew artist -designed mini-golfcourse inSt. Paul, on Jan. 20 — "the day ofthe inau- guration, not a coincidence," Purcell said. Customers will be able to book five-minute blocks to smash as many glass, ceramic and plastic breakables as they can load into a bin. When the Break Room acquires special items, like giant ceramic toi- lets, the privilege of breaking them apart will come with a higher price tag. "People don't quite picture how fun it is," Purcell said. "It's an endorphin release, it's Physical and it's such an expe- rience." This is just the latest entry in Purcell's varied portfolio. She's a blood special effects artist at the Soap Factory's Haunted Basement, curator of the Trash Film Debauch- ery film series, producer of the Mortified live storytelling series and a beekeeper. "Pve really enjoyed providing recreational experiences, but struggled to make a living out of it' she said. "I hope the Break Room can bridge that gap." Besides, people need a place to let go of their anger. "I thinkpeople are just feel- ing a lot of things right now," she said. Not everyone would agree that hammering a teacup is the right approach, though. "We don't recommend any kind of activity that is a behav- ioral rehearsal of an aggressive act," said Dr. Katharine Nel. son, a psychiatrist at the Uni- versity of Minnesota Medical School In other words, throw a vase against the wall once, and you're more likely to want to do it again; maybe even at home. "There used to be this old advice that if you're feeling upset, punch your pillow. We've stopped saying that," Nelson explained."Because even though physical exercise can be a tremendous stress reduction, making the fist and doing that aggressive act actu- ally reinforces the brain areas related to stress and fighting:' Nelson recommends let- ting off steam in less destruc- tive, more beneficial ways, like working out, breathing deeply, doing an adult coloring book, even getting a haircut. For KIM ODE those who just want to smash things, it's better not to think of it as therapy, but rather rec- reation. Purcell agrees with that concept. Although other break -room -style businesses, like the Anger Room in Dallas and the Rage Room in Toronto, specifically invite people who have some hostility to set free, Purcell intends for the Break Room to have a more positive vibe. It's a decidedly Minne- sota approach "I'm not a particularly angry person," she said. "When I smash things, I'm not doing it because I need to let out a burst of aggression. I just love the sound of broken glass." Sharyn Jackson • 612-673-9853 @SharynJackson �a SUNDAY, JANUARY 9, 2017 VARIETY STAR TRIBUNE • Es STATE OF THE ARTS Top: PaisleyPwk/NPG Remrds, Graceland photos: JON BREAM • StarTkibune, PaisleyParkphotos: CARLOS GONZALEZ • StazTribune Although both museums are run by the same company, Graceland and Paisley Park are as different as the music legends who walked their halls. While Elvis' Graceland is playful, fun and homey, Prince's Paisley Park feels sterile, clinical and almost staged. Royal museums They're run by the same people, but how do Elvis' Graceland and Prince's Paisley Park compare? Function Graceland was Elvis' place of residence for 20 years. Sure, he had recording equipment, pianos and guitars at the ready, but it was pri- marily his home. Paisley Park was conceived as a place of creativity. It has three recording studios, a giant soundstage, rehearsal rooms, a tailor's shop and warehouse space. It also had two apartments on the second floor, and one of them became Prince's Minnesota residence after he split with his second wife in 2006 and had their house razed. At Graceland, the upstairs — Elvis' living quarters and the bathroom in which he was found dead in 1977 — are not open to the pub- lic. Similarly, the upper level of Paisley Park is closed. And the elevator in which he was found dead in April 2016 is covered by a display in Paisley's atrium vibe Even though he didn't build the place (he bought it from a doctor's family in 1957), Grace - land oozes Elvis. It's garish, fun playful, homey, lived in. By contrast, Paisley Park, which was built to Prince's specifications in 1986, doesn't smell like Prince. No candles or incense bum arymore. The overly bright complex suggests its creator, with clouds painted on the ceiling in the atrium, and his two doves, Divinity and Majesty, crying from their cages on the off- limits second floor. Paisley, like Prince, reeks ofprivacy, akeep- yourhands-offparanoia. It feels sterile, clini- cal, almost staged, which it is to some extent At Paisley, there are nophotos allowed; in fact, cellphones are forbidden. At Graceland, take as many photos as you desire — as long as you doa't use flash. Like the King dispensing scarves to his faithful at the foot ofthe stage at his conearts, Graceland is approachable and fan-frierdly. Tour guides At Graceland, you are given an iPad featur- ing a guided tour narrated by actor John Sta- mos. You're free to spend as much time as you want in each and every room You can revisit, linger, replay the iPad. At Paisley, a guide leads you on a tour. There is an allotted time for each room so By JON BREAM • ionbream@star[ribme.com raceland and Paisley Park They're as different as Memphis and Minne- apolis, as rock and funk, as the 6 -foot King and the 5 -foot -2 Prince. Elvis had his stud -decorated jumpsuits, an endless supply of silk scarves and a big necklace with his lightning "TCB" (taking care of business) logo. Prince had his colorful custom-designed outfits, anendless collection ofshoeswith4-inchheels and a big necklace with his unpronounceable glyph. Clothes may make the man, as the saying goes, but it's a tour of the buildings iden- tified with these late music icons that defines their lives and careers. Now both are run by the same company, Graceland Holdings LLC. And the same person, Angie Marchese, is the chief archivist at both museums in these Mississippi River cities. She has been with Elvis for 27 years and with Prince for four-plus months, although she did see him perform when she was in eighth grade. We took the VIP tours of Graceland ($80) in November and Paisley Park ($100) in December. as not to bump into other tour groups. The guide recites information memorized from a script. For instance, when standing in the atrium in front of the urn that contains Prince's ashes, guide Mitch Maguire said, "Take a few moments to pay your respects," and he pointed to boxes of Kleenex if nec- essary. He used the same line in December, even though the urn — which had seemed jarring and overly emotional in the middle of the room—has been moved into a case made of frosted plastic mounted on the mezzanine of the atrium, a more neutral spot. (The urn was relocated at the request of Prince's fam- ily, archivist Marchese said.) Timing Graceland was opened to the public for tours in 1982, five years after Elvis died. Believe it or not, Marchese said she's still archiving the King's stuff. They have dis- covered 1.5 million documents — contracts, receipts, canceled checks, etc. — but cata- loged only 200,000 so far. Paisley opened for tours in October, less than six months after Prince died. However, he had been planning for two years to convert Paisley into apart -time museum. His staffhad put together photo murals, award cases and displays related to specific albums and tours. Thus far at Paisley, Marchese has cataloged 121 guitars, eight pianos, 12 cars, 1,000 pairs of shoes and 6,400 outfits. She figures she's encountered only 20 percent of Prince's stuff, much ofwhich is stored in off-site warehouses. What's missing What did Prince do for fun? You see aping- pongtable but not his basketball hoop, bicycles or pool table. He was a funny guy. Where's the humor? How'bout some childhood pic- tures and yearbooks from junior and senior high school? There are no interactive displays of the sort that are commonplace at modem music museums. By contrast, at Graceland you see horses, a handball court and even home movies of Elvis' trips to Hawaii You also can interact with all kinds ofarchival footage and artifacts oftheKing You get the feeling that Graceland has been put together with TLC — and a sense of fun You get the feeling that Paisley Park is presented VIP admission Duration of tour Photo restrictions Studio albums Elvis: $80 Elvis: Unlimited Elvis: no flash Elvis: 40 Prince: $100 Prince: 100 minutes Prince: not allowed Prince: 39 more like Prince's personal life than his music — it's guarded, protective and airbrushed. Bonuses On the VII' tour, you get to visit bothofElvis' private jets; an exhibit in which photographers talk about shooting the King; a behind -the - scenes look at archiving Elvis (with a video featuring Marchese in a storage warehouse); a milli -museum dedicated to Elvis in Hawaii, and a massive auditorium of vehicles includ- ing his Cadillacs (one purple, one pink). It's exhilarating and exhausting. At Paisley Park, VIPs get to visit Studio B, in which they can play Ping-Pong on Prince's table (fun); pose for a tour guide -shot photo in front of Prince's purple piano used on the Piano and a Microphone Tour (nice souvenir on a thumb drive), and, on Thursdays only, record one offour Prince songs with himplay- ing the instruments (so cool). On Sundays, a brunch is included with the VII' tour. Souvenirshops In a strip mall across from Graceland, Elvis fans can browse at U souvenir shops, selling everything imaginable from Elvis panties to reproductions of his jumpsuits. Most expen- sive item: an ornately carved acoustic guitar; for $11,499. At the end ofthe Paisley Park tof u, a merchan- dise tent with space heaters sits in aparking lot. The choices are relatively limited with T-shirts, posters, tote bags, keychains, tambourines, ping- pong balls and the like. Most expensive item: a "cloud" guitar like Prince's, for $1,750. Signature dishes EIV is was known for indulging in deep-fried peanut -butter -and -banana sandwiches. For $3.99, you can have one at Rockabilly's Burger - Shop, found among the unending Graceland souvenir complex. The overly dry sandwich seemed toasted, not deep-fried. At Paisley, Prince's former personal chef will make you a $9 grilled cheese sandwich featuring three kinds of cheese, apples and " honey. Ifs as outrageously good as the Elvis sandwich was unappetizing. Twitter: Moneream • 612-6731719 Movies made Pairs of shoes Souvenir shops Elvis: 33 Elvis: 158 Elvis: 11 Prince:4 Prince: 1,000+ Prince:I "Now we have STAR TRIBUNE • S3 Paisley Park to add to that mix for people to come and see the southwest metro." ON THE BEAT Jeff Filipek, president of the SouthWest Metro yy� Memphis Chamber of Commerce phis �/ 1111 J t7 Graceland has helped generate $3.2 billion in tourism and create advises 35,000 jobs in the city, said Jeff Hulett, director of public relations • for the Memphis Convention and y� p �` l on Paisley Visitors Bureau, inana-mail. "Elvis and theopeningofGrace- land was the beginning of tourism as we know it today in Memphis," Parksite Hulett said. Once tour tickets became avail- able online, at officialpaisleypark. CARVER COUNTY com, Prince fans from around BEATRICE DUPUY the nation from Hawaii to Fargo jumped at their chance to see Pais - dhome The success ofGracelan, ,ho cc ley Park from the inside. The tours offers an t of Elvis Presley, insight will give visitors access to Prince's into the future ofboth Paisley Park personal archives and recording and the citythat calls itself Prince's studios. home — Chanhassen. The opening of the park could Comparisons between the two reshape Chanhassen into a music landmarks arose followingPrince's destination and forever change death when the fate of Paisley Park the community known for its din- came into question. Its fate was ner theater. decided last week, when the city "Wehave always highlighted the of Chanhassen announced that arboretum, the curling center and Bremer Trust, the administrator wineries," Jeff Filipek, president of overseeing Prince's estate, had the Southwest Metro Chamber of applied to rezone Paisley Park as Commerce, said."Andnowwehave a museum. Paisley Park to add to that mix for Graceland Holdings,whichnms people to come and see the south- Graceland in Memphis, is collabo- west metro." rating with Prince's estate to tum April through August is peakvis- Paisley Park into a tourist attrac- iting time for Graceland. August is tion. With tours opening in Octo- especially busy with events dedi- ber, the home of the king has some cated to celebrating Elvis' life near words of wisdom for the home of the date of his death. April, the the prince. month Prince died, could be peak Chanhassen will have to keep time for Paisley Park an open line of communication Chanhassen Mayor Denny with Paisley Park officials, said Laufenburger recently visited Steve Shular, public affairs officer Graceland to get a sense of what of Shelby County, which includes PaisleyParkcouldbecome. Laufen- Memphis. burger said he expects to see "It does create some unique Prince-themed businesses pop up issues with traffic, security, infra- in the city with the opening of the structure and even development park in areas where there might not be "Long term, we are not look- any development there now," Shu- ing for the entire community to lar said. become purple;' he said. " I think More than 600,000 visitors tour slowly we will see an emergence Graceland each year. In 2016, the ofmore things being around Prince park counted its 20 millionth visi- and Paisley Park" tor. Chanhassen's population is Beatrice Dupuy• 612-673-1707 about 24,000 people. But the hordes that arrived to pay homage to the Purple One could be ap early indi- cation of what's in store. Paisley Park to host Celebration concerts on anniversary of Prince's d... http://www.startribune.com/paisley-park-to-host-celebration-concerts... Music Paisley Park to host Celebration concerts on anniversary of Prince's death The Revolution, Morris Day, NPG and other cohorts will perform at his Chanhassen studio in ApriL By Chm ris RieenschnNtler (Mtp://wwwsc m tartAbu /chrls-ri mmmhneicierRO645796/) Star Tribune NOVEMBER 28. 2016 — 2:47PM After the official Prince tribute concert at Xcel Energy Center in October came together last-minute, Paisley Park's operators and his family members are getting a jump start on plans to host a big party on the anniversary of the singer's death next April. Paisley Park announced details for Celebration 2017, scheduled April 20-23 at his Chanhassen studio complex and featuring performances by the Revolution, Morris Day & the Time, members of the NPG crew and 3rdEyeGirl, singers Shelby J and Liv Warfield and other associates yet to be named. Four-day passes went on sale Monday via OffidalPaislel,Park.com, priced $499 for general admission or $999 for VIP. In addition to evening concerts, the event will feature tours, panel discussions, autograph sessions and other daytime activities. It's not yet dear who's performing which nights, and whether or not tickets will be available separately for each night's show. Fortunately, there are still another five months for details to be finalized. While there has been no shortage of Prince tribute concerts since his death on April 21, this is the fust major show scheduled at Paisley Park and the first to feature his "Purple Rain" -era band the Revolution alongside his other dose musical cohorts. The Revolution's members staged their own well-received tribute concerts in early September at First Avenue but could not make it to the Xcel Center concert. The Time did perform at the X, but was given less than 15 minutes. "It's an honor to be a par[ of it, and we wouldn't want to be anywhere else" that weekend, said the Revolution's drummer, Bobby Z. After the Chanhassen City Council approved its rezoning to become a public museum, Prince's studio facility will open up for its fust in a series of Paisley Park After Dark dance parties and movie nights this Friday and Saturday night, tickets for which cost $60. Those events will utilize the smaller NPG Music Club Spam, while the Celebration concerts in April will be staged in the 1,800 -capacity sound stage where Prince often performed. A press release for the April event said it will be modeled after the Prince: A Celebration festival held at the studio in 2000, which "welcomed fans from around the world into an immersive Prince experience that showcased Paisley Park" Not mentioned in the release Tickets to that event in 2000 were only $70 and included a performance by Prince himself @ChnsRstnb chrisr@starhibunncom 612-673-4658 ChrisRstnb (http://stmedia.startdbune.com/images /ows-147699086199944.1pg) CHIME O'MEARA. AP PHOTO Prince's performance for the halftime show at the Super Bowl XLI football game in Miami is I of 1 11/28/2016 1:53 PM Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 sheriffs office is participating along with over 300 agencies from around the state in increased education enforcement of the seatbelt and child seat laws from October 14' to October 30a'. Just a reminder that in 2015 91 unbelted motorists lost their lives in Minnesota from not wearing seatbelts and over the last 5 year period 38 percent of the 1,300 killed while riding in vehicles were not wearing their seatbelts. And in 2015 77 percent of vehicle occupants were ejected or partially ejected and died were not wearing a seatbelt so needless to say you know I've given this update before. This is an annual event but it's still extremely significant and currently 93 percent of the public are routinely and regularly buckling up but we can't emphasize enough how much of a different that makes in the unfortunate event of a crash so we want to continue to encourage people to do that. And then finally we have Halloween safety reminders so folks please make sure your kids and you plan a route in advance and stick to that. Wear comfortable walking shoes with good traction. Stay well lit with reflective tape and markings and use a flashlight. Try to wear short costumes so the children are not tripping over them. If you must wear a mask make sure that the children can see well or consider using make-up as an alternative. Please avoid fake weapons and if you must, if that costume just won't be complete without the sword or something try to make sure they're flexible and not rigid. And make sure to check your child's candy and then most importantly we ask that everyone be cautious on Halloween when driving and give the trick and treaters some extra space and room as they're walking down the roadway so that is all I have for you and I'll stand for questions. Mayor Laufenburger: Good prevention tips Lieutenant. Any questions for Lieutenant Kittelson? Or comments. Thank you. Let's hope we have a safe Halloween. Lt. Eric Kittelson: Me too. Mayor Laufenburger: Thanks Lieutenant. PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM — REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7801 AUDUBON ROAD FROM INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK (1OP) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO FACILITATE THE USE OF THE BUILDING AS A MUSEUM: AND APPROVE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING NO PARKING ON MCGLYNN DRIVE. Mayor Laufenburger: Do we begin, may we begin with a staff report. Ms. Aanenson do you have a staff report? Kate Aanenson: Yes I do, thank you Mayor. As we discussed in the work session this item last appeared on your agenda on October 10`s and at that time you requested that the, permitted up to 12 special event permits which were not all 12 were not used. They selected certain dates and we now have evidence of how the operation went so from the operator's perspective things ran smoothly on the dates. We also have a report from Southwest Transit that things worked smoothly and also from the sheriffs office that there were no incidents so that being said things worked well. We do have information on traffic which I'll let our consultant talk about but what 3rtiR��El"j Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 we did based on the operations and in working with the applicant and how they're managing that with their hours of operation we did make some changes. Or are recommending some changes to the PUD so if I could go through those briefly Mayor, would that be appropriate? Mayor Laufenburger: Please do. Kate Aanenson: Okay, also just correcting some Scribner's errors here. So we added a hotel as a conditional use. Mayor Laufenburger: So why don't you identify where you are in this so we can follow along okay. Kate Aanenson: Sure yep, I'm on page 1. Section 1. So we've added C. There's a new C and that would be conditional uses and it should say the following conditional use. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay I read that as Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development 2(c) is that correct? Kate Aanenson: I'm sorry 2(c) correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And you're adding as a conditional use. Kate Aanenson: The following conditional use we'd add hotel. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: The hotel then would require to come back to the Planning Commission for a public hearing and they make that recommendation to the City Council. Again with the conditional use you have discretion with adding conditions to mitigate the impact of that so it gives you a little bit more leeway there. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Also then on (d) there would be Scribner's that would say all conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted or conditional so again we're still prohibiting several things including outdoor events and liquor sales and consumption. Mayor Laufenburger: So I'm making note that 2(d)(1) now reads as all conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses. Kate Aanenson: That's correct, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright. Anything else? Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Kate Aanenson: Then for the rest of that the changes that we noted before we showed a strikeout in bold so anything that's, excuse me strikeout in italics to show the changes. Mayor Laufenburger: So what section are you in now? Kate Aanenson: I'm in F under site plan would say with the north option I with an access right in for buses only and right out for buses and passenger vehicles. Mayor Laufenburger: So striking the words relocating that north access. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. 100 feet south. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, Kate Aanenson: At this time taking that out. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Anything else? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Under parking then, parking G. G(5) would be the north access shall be limited to right in for buses and right out for buses and passenger vehicles. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay that's a change. Kate Aanenson: And then G(7) we'd be striking the 230 are required. We're not requiring at this time. If they were to expand the use they would have to come back through that process with any other jurisdictional agencies to get approval for an expansion. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Anything else? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Then G(8) would be the number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a), there are sufficient number of parking, on site parking spaces to accommodate the guests who arrive by personal vehicle or (b), the guests arrive by bus so again it's up to the operator to manage that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, Alright. Noted. Anything else? Kate Aanenson: On 9 we would add that until all parking requirements have been met and that would be the ultimate buildout. All access to the site shall be by bus with the exception of employees, contractors and up to 40 guests per hour maximum. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And then under 10, again this kind of ties back to 8 and 9. If the on site parking is inadequate, maximum allowable tour sizes shall be reduced to a level that the 7 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 on site parking is sufficient or the PUD or the site plan must be amended to provide more guests shall be allowed to be bused to and from the site so again managing that by bussing if they can't provide the additional parking. Mayor Laufenburger: Was there anything else? Kate Aanenson: On the ordinance itself that would be it. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay can you go back item F(5) just for a moment? I remember there was some discussion about putting a date on that or is that date in the site improvement agreement? Kate Aanenson: I was going to go to that next Mayor so. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. So that's the changes so far. Kate Aanenson: Yep so the implementation tool for some of these improvements tie back to the site plan improvements. Again this is all, would be all part of your motion. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So strike out from the last iteration that you saw on your October l Os' under 2(c) would be relocating that northern, the driveway 100 feet to the south. They're saying at this time as long as they're using right-in/right-out that that's sufficient. If they want to do more on site parking with more cars then they'd have to come in and provide additional parking on site and we revisit that issue as we talked about and a future conditional add that we talked about a traffic study at 6 months and 12 months. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So that would be 2(c). Mayor Laufenburger: Yep. Kate Aanenson: 2(d) we took out the internal sidewalks. There is a sidewalk coming out of the back of the tent along the building that would follow going up to the front door so there is an internal sidewalk which is the safest way to walk along the building there. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So that is in place. Mayor Laufenburger: Ahight. H Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Kate Aanenson: Then E we modified to say a traffic study shall be completed within, instead of one year strike one year and say 6 and 12 months. Mayor Laufenburger: So this is 2(e). This is a change from the packet. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. And then 2(f) we would qualify that by saying landscaping shall be planted and maintained per the PUD by the spring of 2017. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Any other changes? Kate Aanenson: That's the only changes I have, or that I heard from the. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay and Kate just to clarify this site improvement agreement is referenced in the PUD so it automatically becomes part of the PUD, is that correct? Mr. Knutson that's correct, okay. Roger Knutson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Very well. Alright. Is there anything else of the staff report? Kate Aanenson: No unless you wanted to review some of the summary findings of the traffic study. We've worked hard to make sure that we've incorporated the comments that we've heard from your meeting based on the traffic study and how the operations are working to try to incorporate those into the revised PUD and also the site improvement agreement. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Before you have your concluding remarks, council is there any question that you would like to address to Mr. Pacyna who conducted the traffic study at this time? Okay. Ms. Aanenson any concluding remarks? Kate Aanenson: No. Just that we are recommending approval of the rezoning so there's 4 actual items here. The rezoning for the PUD. From the IOP to PUD. The PUD ordinance itself. The site plan improvement performance agreement. The Findings of Fact and if you wanted to add the McGlynn Drive. Mayor Laufenburger: So right now the language on the screen does not reflect the McGlynn Drive ordinance for parking. So if we wanted to make that part of this it would be part of the motion. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So let's just remember that. Okay. Let me do this. Council, any questions of council, the council has of staff? Anybody? Okay. At this time I'm going to ask if Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 the applicant would like to speak to the council regarding anything that they've observed or any comments they would like to make. Just state your name and address please if you wouldn't mind. Pat Mazural: Thank you Mr. Mayor, council members. I'm Pat Mazural, 9501 Virginia Avenue South, Bloomington and I am a consultant for Bremer Trust. Bremer Trust is the special administrator for the Prince Rogers Nelson Estate. There have been a number of hearings and sessions here and we just want to take this time to express our appreciation to you and to the staff. The staff was very diligent in looking at Paisley Park. Making visits there. Helping us with recommendations. From the beginning they have given us information and recommendations on the proposed operation which helped shaped the original proposal to you. And also we wish to express our gratitude to the council. There have been a number of concerns that you have expressed that we had not anticipated. Concerns that have been addressed. They have I think helped us to better understand what your city is looking for and have improved the operation of Paisley Park as we've seen over the last several days where it's been open. Based on sessions with the City Council and the further recommendations by staff since October 3rd we've implemented a number of modifications that were not here the first time we met. An expanded traffic study will provide all of us with greater comfort as to the traffic flow around Paisley Park. An amendment to routing of the buses was recommended by the Carver County Sheriffs department and that has improved ingress and egress to the site. With the experience of several open days, 3 of which were the busiest projected days by the operator over the next year, we know that the busing option works. As you've heard Southwest Transit manager representative has stated that that was working for us over these last few days. The removal of memorials and management of pedestrian memorabilia has nearly eliminated, greatly reduced pedestrian traffic along the fence and recommendations from your City's parks department as to what will occur along that strip will further reduce pedestrian traffic and in fact will beautify that fence perimeter. Regulated attendance has been adjusted by the operator to reduce peak times that are well within the traffic parameters that have been studied. Audubon Road has been restriped for traffic regulation. The parking lot has been striped, marked so that we have a specific number of stalls on the interior. An interior drive has been installed for queuing of incoming cars and a right only exit from the north entrance has been implemented. All of these are results of recommendations and observations from you and from your staff. If you approve the application for rezoning continuing communication with the City is desired and it's anticipated and if needed continuing adjustments will be made. Our hope is that this is just the beginning of the conversation between Chanhassen and Paisley Park to continually improve the experience of the fans of Prince and the residents of the City. Our goal is that for Chanhassen Prince's legacy will be as valued and welcomed as was Prince himself. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Mazural. Council any questions of the applicant at this time? Councilwoman Ryan. Mr. Mazural would you mind standing for a moment. 10 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Councilwoman Ryan: 'Thank you Mayor. Two just points of clarification please. In the work session you mentioned or it was brought up that you've adjusted the hours of operation. Could you, could somebody speak to that? Pat Mazural: Well I think the hours of operation as anticipated and as we request are 9:00 to 9:00. What the operator has been able to do with pre -purchase of tickets has been able to regulate the flow of traffic. The flow of attendance at Paisley Park so that on certain days in fact those hours will be reduced if there isn't a need for them and the anticipation is that the hour, that the days of Thursday and Sunday will be shorter in duration but in fact we would hope and expect that the PUD would continue with the hours that are approved, or that have been discussed. Councilwoman Ryan: So the change is just temporary correct? Pat Mazural: Well the change is variable and flexible and I think it's a show by the operator that there is no intention to keep the site open just because it can be. That in fact it will be regulated and we're limited by the 40 cars per hour and that's something that the operator is able to see well in advance and regulate throughout the day. Councilwoman Ryan: Perfect and to that point, you know a lot of the traffic and the parking falls on the appropriate management in terms of traffic flow and parking and the spaces available and people moving in and out and I know there's been conversation about a parking plan. Could you or could somebody in your group speak to that more directly? How you're going to manage that from your relationships via the website and how you manage that? Pat Mazural: Yes Councilwoman Ryan. Through the website, through the pre -purchase of sales the operator is able to collect and has the email addresses for those who are purchasing tickets. Through that communication they're able to maintain communication with the guests who are coming and that's the way in which they can be instructed as to whether to park at the facility. Whether to go to the busing facility in order to be shuttled over there. Or any other changes that may occur so that's an ongoing communication that's able to happen with the operator and the guest. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay, alrigbt thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Mazural, Councilwoman Ryan's questions were regarding hours but what are the intended days that the operator will be operating? At least for the foreseeable future. Can you speak to that? Pat Mazural: Yes for foreseeable future the operator intends to be open 4 days a week, Thursday through Sunday. Those are days that are certainly the most popular and the days on which, as I mentioned earlier Thursday and Sunday will be shorter, or are expected to be shorter with the full hours on Friday and Saturday. 11 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Perfect, okay. Any other questions of the applicant? Alright, thank you Mr. Mazural. Pat Mazural: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: We may have other questions for you so don't go far alright. Just a reminder, we have many people in the chamber this evening and I'm pleased to have you here to observe our process and deliberating over this. 'There has been public comment available at the Planning Commission on September 20`x. We also offered public comment on October Yd for the council meeting and also on October I& for the council meeting but I recognize that there may be people here this evening who have not had a chance to appear in front of the council so at this time I would like to open for public comment the opportunity for people who have not yet appeared before the council to come forward and express your views and I would just ask that if you do come forward to express your views, be respectful of the council and the chambers as well as the other people here and simply state your name and address and we'll accept public comment for a few minutes. Come forward if you'd like. Vernelle Clayton: Mayor and members of the council, my name is Vernelle Clayton. I'm a resident of Chanhassen. I own a business in Chanhassen and I coordinate the Buy Chanhassen organization which is a quasi chamber type organization comprised of business owners and others here in Chanhassen. Mayor Laufenburger: Welcome. Vernelle Clayton: 'Thank you. In that role I recently sent an email around to the, we have a rather large email list and a relatively small paid membership but I sent an email. Mayor Laufenburger: Was that an advertisement? Vernelle Clayton: Yes it was. And basically what I said was, and I'll kind of paraphrase is that we, that I as the Chair of the organization, not representing them per se as their thoughts was that we think that anything that brings, such as this, that brings business, more customers and clients to our businesses is nothing but beneficial to our community and that our businesses are, the more successful they are the better products and better services we all get and the more businesses will come and want to be here in Chanhassen and that just means nothing but lower taxes for the rest of us. So with that I invited them to respond and most of them were fairly unexciting but agreeable. You know one of them said right on which I don't know exactly what generation he's from. Mayor Laufenburger: We accept all generations. 12 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Vernelle Clayton: Yeah exactly. Exactly. I'll just relate 2 others that were a little more interesting. One was from a woman who had taken the bus one of the first days it was opened and noticed that on the way back people were saying well that was really fun. Now what do we do? Is there anything else going on in Chanhassen so she said Vernelle here is an opportunity. We have to have information on those buses as to what's going on so that we can capture their enthusiasm and their dollars. The other one, and this one is well most of us are just okay taxes, customers, 1, 2, 3, 4. This one was much more poetic. She said, truly what a gift Prince and his family members are offering us yet again so we like the idea. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Ms. Clayton. Is there anybody else that would like to speak at this time that has not spoken prior? Jeff Filipek: Mr. Mayor and council members. Sorry for jumping the gun earlier. Mayor Laufenburger: It's alright. Jeff Filipek: Pretty excited about Paisley Park. Just echo a few things. Mayor Laufenburger: Your name and address please. Jeff Filipek: Jeff Filipek with the Southwest Metro Chamber. To echo a few things, again our appreciation for your thoughtful consideration and for all the work that the City's done. I was able to take the tour last night and like was mentioned before, smooth. It was a really great experience and I'll piggy back on some of what Vernelle had to say. We, I'm going to fall short of speaking on behalf of all 460 of our chamber members but last week a called a couple dozen of them. Restaurants, hotels, some retailers, gas stations in the area and it was a resounding yes. Paisley Park would be terrific for our community and for our businesses. One restaurant last weekend cited a 36 percent increase in business during the 2 hours so I know you have some obstacles to discuss and I appreciate that discussion but I think the economic impact and the benefit to the community for Paisley Park is going to be tremendous. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you Mr. Filipek. Is there anybody else who hasn't appeared before the council would like to speak at this time? Tamara Erickson: Hello council members. I'm Tamara Erickson, Vice President and co-owner at Chanhassen Dinner Theaters. We at Chanhassen fully support Paisley Park happening as a museum here. We have been partnering with Paisley Park to work through some of the parking and transportation issues. They have been nothing but amenable to you know our requests. I mean I don't think we've totally figured that part all out yet but I don't see that as being something that's insurmountable. You know we all at Chanhassen have a great love for Prince. We want to be part of maintaining his legacy in this community and supporting this venture. We think it's really important for the community. Important for business. Keeping Chanhassen just growing as a tourist, really a tourist mecca. We see it really developing as Paisley Park partners 13 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 with all of us here in Chanhassen to bring us to the next level and we see a really great future if this thing goes through. Mayor Laufenburger: Tbank you Ms. Erickson. Tamara Erickson: Thank you. Michael Brindisi: Hi council members, Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Your name and address please. Michael Brindisi: Michael Brindisi, 8035 Erie Avenue, Chanhassen, Minnesota. My cohorts encouraged me to get up and say something. They said you live here. You should say something. Mayor Laufenburger: You live and work here don't you Mr. Brindisi? Michael Brindisi: Yeah I'm the president of the Chanhassen Dinner Theater. My partner just spoke Tamara Kangas Erickson. You know I'll tell you what I just, they said say something and the first thing that came to my mind was when I was very young I used to say to myself I don't want to be 40 years old and look back and say there was something I wanted to do that I should have tried and now I think when I'm 80 years old I don't want to look back and think of something I haven't tried. I sort of run my life having faith in people. I always trust my audience. I believe in them. I believe that they're smart. I always think of them as smart people and that makes me be smarter and I kind of put a white piece of cloth on the stage and say it's a castle and believe that they'll believe it's a castle. I just believe in people and I don't think there's anything that we as a community can't do but I don't think we want to be here years from now thinking I wish we had tried that. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Brindisi. Anybody else? Michael Engelhardt: Council members, Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Your name and address please. Michael Engelhardt: Yeah my name is Michael Engelhardt. I live at 403 Santa Fe Trail. Mayor Laufenburger: Welcome. Michael Engelhardt: Thank you. I'm sorry if I'm a little outdated with some of my information but I did work at Paisley Park the opening night. What is it like 3 weeks ago now I guess as a parking attendant and I noticed a lot of problems there. I understand that they are addressing 14 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 some of those problems but I did notice one big problem that has not been brought up in any of the meetings. I don't know if there was a working meeting before this meeting. Mayor Laufenburger: There was but. Michael Engelhardt: Okay I don't know. Mayor Laufenburger: Speak freely Mr. Engelhardt. Michael Engelhardt: Yeah I don't know if it was brought up but all the people that were arriving by Uber and Lift and taxi cab could be dropped off inside the facility. Inside the fence but then when they were being picked up they had to cross Audubon and get picked up on the comer of what is it, McGlynn and Audubon. I don't know if that has been addressed or if that has been fixed but I do think that will need to be addressed in the future because I mean we obviously don't want a lot of pedestrians crossing Audubon and a lot of pedestrians don't know to walk all the way down to Highway 5 to cross and then walk down to McGlynn so I think that will need to be addressed in the future as a designated pick up location for these people arriving if, that don't arrive by bus or by, or take their own vehicle. And also I do think there should be more signing at the location. One of the things I noticed on the first night is the main sign for the location had not changed so it still said just the address. It did not say Paisley Park Museum. It did not say Paisley Park studios. It just had the address and it said main gate, the north gate and we had, at that time everybody coming in the south gate so I don't know if that sign has been changed. I haven't had a chance to go out to the location but obviously I think that sign will need to be changed so people know first of all what the actual thing is. I think there should be a sign that says Paisley Park Museum. And second of all to note that the north gate is for buses. And thirdly I think, I just, I feel that this whole process has been really rushed from the beginning. I like to look back and note that Graceland did not open until 2 or 3 years after Elvis passed away and I just feel like this whole process of opening Paisley Park has been really rushed from the beginning. Prince, may he rest in peace, died in April and now we are opening the museum 6 months later. Less than 6 months later so I think what I would recommend, what I would like to see the City Council do is to make sure that all these improvements that are looking at being made like expanding the parking lot. Regulating traffic are actually made before opening the museum full time because the thing I'm especially concerned about is the bus traffic and especially in the winter when there's going to be 6 foot snow drifts on every comer and we're going to have buses traveling back and forth between the transit station and Paisley Park. I'm just really concerned about pedestrians getting, or those buses being in danger because of a lot of snow and ice and that's my comments. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Engelhardt. Is there anybody else who'd like to speak? Scott Jesse: Yes Mr. Mayor. My name is Scott Jesse. I live at 8198 Stone Creek Drive here in Chanhassen. I'm a life long Prince fan so I want to start with that. In past council meetings you had asked people to state their position. I'm definitely for Paisley Park as a museum. 15 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: You're welcome to state that position Mr. Jesse. Scott Jesse: And I have some concerns. Mayor Laufenburger: You're welcome to state those too. Scott Jesse: Thank you. So we've had a lot of empirical data from staff and from the traffic studies which is great. I'm going to provide some anecdotal experience, sort of a self describgd expert due to my proximity to Paisley Park. My residence is less than 1 mile from the entrance to Paisley Park. Pedestrian traffic on Audubon is a problem. Has been a problem and continues to be a problem that has yet to be addressed adequately. I'm concerned that people are going to get hurt. The barriers that have been put up to prevent people from walking across the street on Audubon have actually caused some pedestrians to walk in the street along those until they get to an access point. It's a very scary situation because I drive by there every day. To get to my house I must drive past Paisley Park and that's been an honor for the last 14 years. I am just concerned about the way this is being handled from a traffic standpoint. Pedestrian traffic is a problem. Car traffic is a problem and right in and right out does not necessarily fix the problem because there's now stacking on Audubon to get in to Paisley Park. I have safely taken a picture from my vehicle with a passenger taking the picture of a bus double parked with it's hazards on sitting there waiting to tum right with it's hazards on sitting there. That's a problem. You cannot go around that safely. You have to wait until that bus moves. That bus is not intending to move for a period of time if it's hazards are on and that is my experience on October 13`s of this month. Cars. Uber and taxis were brought up. That is absolutely the case. It's a massive safety hazard because people are being dropped off at that north entrance and/or picked up at that north entrance and the Uber or the taxi drivers are stopping and that is preventing myself and other car traffic from going past there safely. That has to be addressed. You cannot allow taxi drivers to just stop right there and pick up and drop off on a street that's designated for I think it's 50 miles per hour on Audubon so that's a concern. You know a laundry list of things that I want to be very succinct and make sure that I'm cognizant of your time but just a couple of bullet point things. We are all fans of Prince I think. You know most people are fans of Prince and we want to show our respects. That has been changed. That has been taken away from us by not allowing any more things to be put on the fences and there needs to be a location so that people can show a place for their respects. There is McGlynn Drive is packed. Anytime that you go drive by McGlynn Drive it is full and that has to be addressed. You can't, I heard in the working session earlier that maybe we could separate those and that's up to you guys as the experts. I'm just telling you that that drive is constantly packed with cars and people are crossing that street and although there was a study being done and I'm sure that it was done with appropriateness, the problem is people are still illegally walking across the street as they shouldn't. And then the restriping is great but it isn't enough. The cones that are there need to be made permanent so that people do not tum left into the north entrance. That is a dangerous situation that you have to address with a permanent solution, whether it be curbing or what have you. And the last comment I wanted to make was with regards to the hours of operation. You know please don't 16 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 leave the hours of operation up to the operator. That's like the fox guarding the hen house. We need to have somebody who is relegating it to something similar to what the 5 year process that happened for Graceland. If the hours are Graceland are successful for Graceland why can't we implement those same hours here? Why do we expecting longer hours, deeper hours that will impact me and my family and my children as we're trying to utilize this part of our life because that's exactly where we have to go anytime we go in or out of our house. With that that's all I have, thank you though. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Mr. Jesse. Is there anyone else who would like to speak at this time that has not spoken to the Planning Commission or the council before? Ahight. Then with that I will bring this back to the council. Council any questions that you would like staff to address at this time? If not I will open this for council discussion and/or motion. Kate would you put that motion up in front of us please. Councilwoman Ryan: Mayor I have some questions please. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh please, please. Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: While I think a couple good points were brought up. Mr. Oehme you did mention in the work session about the, I don't want to call it the pork chop but that's what's stuck in my head so if you could address the removal of the cones to make sure that the no left turn is permanent. Paul Oehme: Yes so Councilwoman Ryan so the intent would be to, we have two options. One to have the right-in/right-out at the intersection of the entrance, the north access to Paisley Park. Have a splitter median basically or sometimes they call it a pork chop island in the middle there so you can only go, exiting out to the north and come in from the south so you can't make that left into the site. That's one option. The other option is to basically put a concrete median, extend the concrete median from the intersection of Highway 5 where it is today, south past that north access point and so you cannot make a left into Paisley Park on the north access point so those are those two options so I think it would be probably staff's recommendation to extend that center median on Audubon down south farther than it is today so there's no opportunity to make that left into that north access roadway. Councilwoman Ryan: And so as part of the process is that something that then should be added to what? Kate Aanenson: The Site Plan Improvements Agreement. Councilwoman Ryan: The Site Plan Improvement Agreement to make that a permanent structure. Paul Oehme: Yeah that would be fine, yep. 17 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Just let me stop for just a second. Councilwoman Ryan are you specifically suggesting that that be the solution or are you suggesting that staff work with the operator to come up with the best solution? What's your suggestion there? Councilwoman Ryan: My suggestion is that would be the solution to eliminate any potential left turns and so make it per Mr. Oehme's recommendation I agree that I think that should be part of the site improvement. Kate Aanenson: We do have a condition in there. If you look at under 2. It's numbered incorrectly so it would be 2(d). It says (a) and that would be the restriction would limit potential for motorists traveling along Audubon Road, a pork chop island should be placed to control the right-in/right-out. So it's on page 2 of that, of the site improvement agreement. Mayor Laufenburger: What's the section and what's the letter again? Kate Aanenson: It's under required improvements. Mayor Laufenburger: Required improvement, Section 2 of the site improvement agreement. Kate Aanenson: So under (c). Mayor Laufenburger: (c). Kate Aanenson: So it would allow the northern access to remain but then the qualifier under that would be that this restriction would limit potential motorists from traveling along Audubon Road a pork chop island should be placed in the access to control right-in/right-out so the other option would be as stated by the City Engineer would be extend the median would be the other option. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay just before you do that. Mr. Oehme is there any other, anything else that could be done? I understand your recommendation of extending that but is there anything else that could be done? Paul Oehme: Permanently I think those are our two best options. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay are you prepared to accept then that if we stipulate that it be a permanent barrier, pork chop little gravy on it, pork chop that you're willing to accept that that's a solution that you're prepared to go with? Paul Oehme: Correct, yeah I mean either. Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright I was just, the only question I was trying to answer is, is that what you want to stick with because if that's what you want to stick with then we should make that 18 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 part of it. If you would like time to review other options then tell us that but I don't think that's what you're telling us, is that correct? Paul Oehme: No. I think staff's comfortable moving forward with saying. Councilwoman Ryan: For the permanent structure. Paul Oehme: Right. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so Kate your modification is under the Site Improvement Performance Agreement, item 2(c). Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Language to reflect a permanent barrier on the median. Kate Aanenson: Yes. Well we actually qualified it by saying a pork chop but. Paul Oehme: We can strike that. Kate Aanenson: You can strike it and say permanent barrier if that's. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, duly noted. Anything else Councilwoman Ryan? Councilwoman Ryan: Yes. A couple more things. The signage. I know everything has to be approved in order to put signage up. What is the ultimate plan for, you know it's been discussed at the last couple meetings, I mean one obviously an identifying sign that this is a museum but we had mentioned some road signs. Directional signs as well as enter only. Exit only. Those types of signs. What would be the timing on that? Paul Oehme: They should be going up you know as soon as the, this item would be approved so that would be part of the approval to get those signs up as soon as they, it's been approved. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And then last I'd like to discuss as a council or hear from the applicant to address the concerns about Lift and Uber and taxi cabs and how they are planning on facilitating those vehicles entering but more importantly my understanding is that the pick up is where the concern exists. Mayor Laufenburger: So let's ask staff, have you had dialogue with the applicant about this? Okay Mr. Mazural would you mind coming back to the or Mr., and wait for me to ask this question before you answer it okay. Go ahead you can go there. The question is. Joel Weinshanker: Joel Weinshanker, New York, New York. 19 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Oh yeah thank you Mr. Weinshanker. The question is have you thought about how you're going to solve this problem of Uber and Lift cabs in queuing? Joel Weinshanker: So specifically to Uber and Lift, once approved Uber and Lift will allow us to designate the area, just like you would at an arena or even the airport where there's a designated area so everyone knows to go exactly at MSP, Uber and Lift they know exactly where to go. Once approved Uber and Lift will allow us, we've already been in contact with Uber and Lift. It's just another phone call but they'll allow us to tell the driver exactly where to come because I've had, to be very frank I've taken an Uber back and forth and the drivers just don't know where to go so once we make, you know on their GPS, on their thing it will tell them come into here. Go into here and once that happens we'll allow not on the in, we'll allow them to come in but also any Uber or Lift and they all have the little square will allow them to come into allow people, and at the end of the day we should allow them to come up to the tent so it shouldn't even be. So we should treat them like not dissimilar from how a handicap person would park. So they would come in. Come up to the, come up to the tent. Come up to the exit and then we would allow them to come in and out. As it relates to a taxicab company we can certainly, with the help of the City and staff identify all the different companies that would be a possibility from the airport to local and we would have those same conversations. Mayor Laufenburger: So it sounds like Mr. Weinshanker what you want to do is, if approved you will bring the Uber, the Lift, the cabs onto your property. Work with the, whoever the ticket holder. Let them exit. Either let Uber or Lift stay there or direct them somewhere else to come back at a time that the exit is. Joel Weinshanker: They won't stay and it's been my experience that actually there are a number of Uber drivers who are actually Chanhassen residents so they're home and then they get a thing and they come right here. I've had 2 Chanhassen residents actually take me to the airport so, but it would be impractical for them to stay. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Stay right there. City staff where would you like those Uber and Lift cabs to wait once they leave Paisley and they have to wait for an hour or so, where would you like them to be? Lake Ann Park? No. Joel Weinshanker: They're going to go to other calls. No one's going to wait. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt? Todd Gerhardt: We want them on site. Mayor Laufenburger: You want them to stay on site? 20 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Todd Gerhardt: Yep. Just like if we allowed up to 40 cars per hour we want Uber, Lift and the taxis to go on site. Drop their passengers off and then exit just like the buses and cars would. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilwoman Ryan does that answer your question you think? Councilwoman Ryan: So just for clarification, why didn't you allow them before? Were they not allowed to come back on? Joel Weinshanker: It wasn't that they were allowed it's when they get a fare it's what the GPS tells them to do. So normally, so right now there are no special instructions within the Uber and Lift system for Paisley Park so they were unsure of what to do but it's very simple, and it's done all the time. The Dinner Theater may even have a similar situation where we just instruct them come in the south gate. Come through here and here's what you're going to pick up people so we'll have a designated pick up area just like the airport does. The airport has a designated pick up area and the Uber and Lift know to go there and the people know to walk there. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay so then this designated area I'm assuming it's like similar to where the buses are picking up? Joel Weinshanker: Exactly. Councilwoman Ryan: And so how does that work for back up and queuing and that now that you're going to have, if you say a number of Uber and Lift and taxi cabs are coming in I would guess that that's adding to the. Joel Weinshanker: It's a small, small number. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay, Joel Weinshanker: So we're looking at, I'm going to ask Shannon Pratt, one percent. Less than one percent. Less than one percent of the people are doing that and if instructed by the City staff if it became an issue when we are having buses in, we can instruct them to drop them off at, at the. Mayor Laufenburger: The bus terminal. Or the transit station. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Okay, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Good question, thank you. Any other question or, Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: My comment along the lines of signage Mr. Mayor. I've gotten some commentary via email, et cetera that those ticket holders flying in from out of state or outside the Midwest may not know what a parking ramp is and so that we may have to. 21 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Differentiating between a ramp and a garage right? Councilman Campion: Correct. Just wanted to state that for the record. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah is it soda or pop? Is it chewing gum or Chiclet like? Just, Councilwoman Ryan asked this question I think in the work session and I'm going to just usurp her asking it, Mr. Mazural would you mind just addressing this for a second? Bremer Trust has been given it's authority by the Judge to operate as a museum. Pat Mazural: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: That's correct. And Bremer Trust has essentially responsibility for everything that happens on that site, is that correct? Pat Mazural: As long as it's the special administrator which is it's role correct. Mayor Laufenburger: But things like what happens on the tour, how people buy tickets, interaction with PPark Management LLC, that is clearly not the responsibility of the City. That is the responsibility of the operator is that correct? Pat Mazural: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Just needed to make sure that that's on the public record because I think that certainly it's reflected in some of the communications that all of us have received that there are people that believe that the City of Chanhassen has some you know financially, fiduciary beneficial interest in this and that's not the case. We're just trying to manage this from a zoning standpoint. Okay. Pat Mazural: Correct Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: So thank you Mr. Mazural. Any other questions or comments? Or motion. Kate Aanenson: Mayor I just want to make one comment. I did modify the motion to add the no parking on McGlynn. The resolution for approving no parking. That was added. Mayor Laufenburger: So right now we're looking at 5 elements to this is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. 22 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: We're looking at the rezoning to the PUD. The PUD ordinance itself The Site Improvement Performance Agreement as recently modified. The Findings of Fact and the resolution of no parking on McGlynn. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And we can handle those all together or we can handle them independently. Okay. Councilman Campion: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: I'll make a motion. The City, the Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and adoption of the attached PUD ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, Findings of Fact and No Parking Resolution for McGlynn Drive. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, just let me clarify. You didn't state it but the Site Improvement Performance Agreement as modified by Kate Aanenson within the last few minutes. Councilman Campion: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Reflecting the permanent structure preventing. Councilman Campion: Replacing the pork chop. Mayor Laufenburger: Exactly. Exactly. Kate Aanenson: Also modifications that were stated in the PUD. Mayor Laufenburger: Right. That we went over individually. Okay we have a motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Tjomhom seconds that motion. We have a valid motion and a second. Is there any discussion from the council members? Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Ryan. 23 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Councilwoman Ryan: I'd like to share some thoughts if I may. Mayor Laufenburger: You certainly may. Councilwoman Ryan: I will be voting in favor of the rezoning. However I think it's important to express some of the things that have happened over the last 3 weeks. So from the onset I did feel similar to the gentleman that spoke earlier today that the proposal felt a little bit rushed and it's funny because I live by the 5 P's if many people are familiar with that. That prior planning prevents poor performance and the prior planning piece is what was missing for me but over the course of the past few weeks a lot of the concerns and issues that I had have been addressed and including traffic studies, the McGlynn, the road closure, you know some of the landscaping. Management coming up with a more of a parking lot plan to facilitate limited cars and buses and some of the other things that we addressed tonight in terms of making changes tonight with Uber and Lift and noting some of the hours of operation. These were the changes that we made as a council because we took the time to slow down. Ask some questions. Observe and then alter the original proposal so that operationally from the City's perspective the museum could run effectively and safely with limited impact to the neighborhood. I think that we did a good job checking the boxes before proceeding so I want to say that I appreciate the hard work and the questions that were asked by my fellow council members. From staff as well as Paisley Park Management to get these things accomplished. However I know this was briefly addressed at the last meeting, I want to make mention again tonight. There is a process that every business, resident and anyone who comes before the City with plans is required to follow and as councilors it is our responsibility to treat every proposal equally, holding it to the same high level of standards. It is clear now that the initial proposal that we received was incomplete yet somehow the council took the blame for not moving forward. And then at the second meeting many questions were addressed but still questions remained so we again put it on hold. In the back and forth in my mind created a swirl of emails and gave the City of Chanhassen somewhat of a black eye. We took the brunt of hundreds of emails from very upset people blaming us, the City Council and some of those emails, as my fellow council members would probably attest to were somewhat ugly and insulting. So again with proper planning this could have been avoided. On the flip side we heard from many residents who appreciated us slowing down to ask the important questions. To challenge the speed at which this was moving because they know Paisley Park is going to address and affect them daily and directly. So our number one priority was to represent the people of Chanhassen and be responsible in our decision making. I firmly believe that Paisley Park will be a great asset to this community. As with many businesses that operate here, many of those who spoke tonight as well as the thousands of residents who live in Chanhassen we value the relationship that exists between the two so we want to work together. Show each other respect that is equally deserved so we can do what is best for our community as well as the thousands who visit. So our goal was to get this right and let's make sure we do. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilwoman Ryan. Any other comments? 24 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Councilman Campion: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: I believe I'd like to echo a lot of Councilwoman Ryan's comments. I'd say despite an initial bumpy road you know with the way that this got started with the pre -sale of tickets that the operator has worked with the City in good faith in addressing the concerns and issues and while all this might be happening pretty quickly relatively if you compare it to Graceland or others, yeah I don't feel like we should create obstacles just to draw it out more. I feel that we've addressed a lot of the concerns and will it be perfect? Is it perfect? No but it's a work in progress and I think it's only going to get smoother as it goes forward. I believe that this is good for Chanhassen and I look forward in the future to buying tickets and taking my family on the tour. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Campion. Anybody else? Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Yes, thank you. From the onset I've never been against Price's studio becoming a museum. What I was against was as Councilwoman Ryan had stated, it was very poor planning. I had a lot of issues with the fact that I knew a lot of things had not been thought through. Initially what I wanted in order to make this work I wanted a trial period. I got roughly a month and at that point we did hash out a lot of problems that no one had thought about that did pop up. We've now made this a much better, at least a much better product from the standpoint of getting people to and from the museum and I do wish to thank the Paisley Park Management for working with us instead of just burying your head in the sand and you know trying to fight against us. You have been very cooperative and very open to the suggestions that we have been making so I do appreciate that and it goes a long way towards again getting me to really support this. The thing that still bothers me the most is you know one of the things that Councilwoman Ryan spoke about is treating everyone fairly. Prior to the meeting tonight in work session we dealt with another developer that has been a couple of years in the making. They have been a couple of years trying to go through and get a plan through, not only this council but prior councils and there have always been problems and it always revolves around traffic, use, what they're going to do with the site and the impact upon the surrounding area. I do agree that one of our responsibilities as council members is to look out for the citizens and that's what we've been trying to do. I feel much better about voting for this because we did manage to get a 6 month review period and also a year review period and that's all I've ever wanted from the very beginning was to at least have some leverage to go through and as these problems pop up how do we address them. How do we go back to the operator and say you've got to fix this because a PUD is very permanent and once a PUD is passed we don't have a lot of options as far 25 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 as going back and again getting changes to make everything work better so I'm very pleased with the way the process has worked it's way out. I'm glad that the operator did agree to the review periods. I'm glad that they're working again to improve the traffic. The fact that you've now gone and reduced the days from 7 back down to 4 I think is you know very good. I know at some point you're going to come back and you want to go all 7 days but by that time I'm hoping that you've really got something that you can operate with and you know the in's and out's of and the community also knows the in's and out's of so because of all that I'm more than willing to support it tonight. I think it will be a great addition to the City of Chanhassen. I have heard from a number of members in the business community that have again told me what it means to them and I understand that being a member of Vernelle's very small group of people. Mayor Laufenburger: Wait are you a paying member? Councilman McDonald: No, well I do pay something. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, good. Councilman McDonald: But yeah I understand all of that and one of the things I've always run on was we need to improve the business climate within our community. I'm hoping that the museum will help to do that because of the spillover to other businesses so all I can say is welcome to the community and thanks for working with us. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilman McDonald. Anybody else? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yes Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Thank you. At the beginning of this process the Mayor did ask us a question. Are we supportive? Is that what you said? Was that the word you used? Mayor Laufenburger: Are you support or support with concerns or are you in opposition. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Support, I just wanted to see if it was supportive or what it was and I had said that I was supportive with, what was the word you used? Mayor Laufenburger: Concerns. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Concerns, thank you. It seems like that was a long time ago doesn't it? Mayor Laufenburger: 3 weeks. 26 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Councilwoman Tjornhom: We've all spent a lot of time together in these chambers. And back then I said I was supportive with concerns and I, one of my main concerns and I couldn't put a finger on it until I really thought about it and that is transparency. If you go to our website, if you talk to our neighbors, you talk to anybody in this state, this country we're all screaming for transparency. You know just do the process. Be honest and let's work through whatever we are working with and Paisley Park was never a bad idea. Turning it into a museum. It had obstacles. Not problems, obstacles and I always believe that obstacles are not impossible to solve but we all have to figure out what those obstacles are and how to solve them and I think the process just started out really rough. It started out really fast. In my time as a council member, and I won't tell you how many years that's been but I can tell you that man we will hold homeowners to the fire for having not enough impervious surface or pervious surface and we'll bring them back to 2, 3, 4 times just for that and so just to go ahead and rezone something without having the public being part of the process also which was really important to me, to let their voices be heard just seemed that's not who we are and that's not how we do business and so I appreciate staff. I appreciate the applicant and my future. My future? My council members besides me tonight for sticking in there. You know I'm hoping that when we leave tonight, I don't know if you'll still be here but you know we can shake hands in the parking lot and welcome you to Chanhassen and thank you for investing in us and I really do feel that way so thank you so much for your patience and your diligence in helping us solve some obstacles and working through them so I too will be supporting this tonight. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilwoman Tjornhom. There was a question that was raised 3 weeks ago that continues to resonate in my mind and it was a legitimate question and that is, do we want to be a tourist town. In my view there are elements of Chanhassen that are characterized as an attraction or a destination. Whatever words you choose but by definition tourists are people who travel to our town for the purpose of entertainment or pleasure. We love it when people come to our community. We conduct festivals to bring people to our community. We build businesses to bring people to our community. We love it. Businesses love it. Neighborhoods grow as a result of it. Commerce and industry follows. Civic organizations grow. Schools rise up to serve the community. Opportunity, prosperity and goodness abound. And if you're not convinced just look at this recent lifestyle guide from Chanhassen Villager. It talks about the good life in Chanhassen. In the City of Chanhassen we've observed for the last 50 years that people, business and industry have found something in this city that they want to be a part of. Yep, even Prince found it to be a nice place to call home and he chose to stay here. To own property here to build his business and his reputation right here. Now during these 50 years that Chanhassen's been a City the City leaders have guided development and growth in a responsible manner and the City has been recognized and awarded for that over the last several years. Now yes, we've had some hiccups and a few stumbles along the way but the results show that this community has continued to retain it's character, quality of life while respecting the rights of our residents and welcoming visitors and new residents in a hospitable manner as they arrive. Now the truth is we do not know what the future holds in the coming years. There are likely circumstances that we encounter that will challenge all of us to modify our Comprehensive Plan. Our expectations. We may have to rethink green space and retail uses throughout the city. RA Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 Guidelines for development might have to change or adjust to an aging population. In 1967 City Fathers did not know what would happen during the subsequent 50 years and beyond but like all of us today they were asked to plan as best they could and be prepared to observe and adjust the plans as necessary and through all we do we help residents and visitors enjoy, prosper, preserve and enrich our community for generations to come. Now the City did not work to build the reputation of Prince Rogers Nelson. He did that with his own creativity, his genius and his artistry. But what Chanhassen did was make this the community in which he chose to stay. There's nothing that we as a council can do to change the feelings and the passion that Prince fans around the world have about Paisley Park, about Prince and his legacy. My belief is that these people are going to come and they will pay their respects to his legacy and they will process his untimely death as they choose. Now to the question that was raised October P. Do we want to be a tourist town? I believe that question was answered years and years ago and has been reaffirmed repeatedly ever since. The only question that remains is will we as a community welcome Prince fans, whoever they are and wherever they come from with hospitality and all that that requires or not. All those in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves, with amendments by City staff, the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, Findings of Fact and No Parking Resolution #2016-70 for McGlynn Drive. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: That motion carries 5-0. Now before you go, in just a moment I'm going to ask for a 10 minute recess. By the way did you record that 5-0? Did you get that Kate? In a moment I'm going to ask for a 10 minute recess but before I do let me offer some additional comments. I want to say thanks to all the people that either raised their voice here in the council chamber at City Hall or through the public hearing or during public comment. I know that it takes a little bit of moxie to step up to that microphone. Trust me your voices were heard. I also want to thank the hundreds of people who voiced their views via email, via social media, via personal conversations with members of the council, your voices too were heard. I also want to say thank you to the folks at Bremer Trust and PPark Management who have followed our process through interaction with the City staff and with residents. You've made adjustments in your plans and operational in response to the City's request and also to those visitors and potential visitors. Now yes, as Councilwoman Ryan mentioned I recognize there are disappointments from some resulting from our deliberations but I'm trusting that you PPark Management will continue to provide your customers with the assistance that you can. And I also want to thank City staff for being responsive to council's request for information and adjustments. Your wisdom, your experience as always is of the highest quality. Your job is to ensure that this council has the information we need to make the best decisions for the City. Once again you have succeeded in your job. Thank you. And to my fellow council members I'm proud to serve with each of you. I respect your views and your concerns. Your questions K2 Chanhassen City Council — October 24, 2016 and desire for deliberate discussion has resulted in a policy decision on which City staff, the operators and this community can execute with confidence and with precision, both now and in the future and I say thanks to each of you. Now at this time we will recess at 8:20 until 8:30. I know some of you will want to exit the chamber. We are in recess for 10 minutes. There was a 10 minute recess at this point in the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: CERTIFICATION OF DELINOUENT SEWER AND WATER ACCOUNTS,• AND DELINQUENT CODE ENFORCEMENT VIOLATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: We do this every year. Mr. Oehme is this on you? Mr. Sticha. Welcome Mr. Sticha, nice to have you here. Greg Sticha: Good evening Mayor. On an annual basis staff requests of City Council per the City's ordinance as well as state statutes 429 and 444 the certification of delinquent code enforcement and utility accounts to the County Auditor. Taking a look at the numbers as compared to previous years and noted in my memo to council, very similar as compared to previous years. We are asking for certification of 2 delinquent code enforcement violations. This compares to 3 from the previous years. This year's total is $1,200 as compared to $859 from the previous year. The current status of our delinquent utility accounts is 230 accounts with a total value of $130,000 as compared to 229 accounts with a total dollar value of $125,000 compared to last year. The process as you're familiar with previous years is to have a public hearing. Give those who are on the certified delinquent list an ability to present to council reasons for not having those certified. We have not been presented, staff has not been presented any requests for not hearing a dispute of the certifications. The delinquent utility accounts will be certified to the County Auditor if council approves this evening on December 19`. Residents still have until November 23'a to pay their delinquent accounts. Usually between now and the middle of November we have approximately a fourth to a third that will pay their accounts in full so typically the amount that gets certified to the County Auditor is about 75 percent or a little less of the amount that's presented this evening. With that I will take questions from council and then ask council to open the public hearing. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you Mr. Sticha. Any questions of council? Councilman McDonald: I have a question. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Mr. Sticha, I know in the past that we've talked about identifying delinquent users and we've always kind of sided on the side of privacy. At some point does this become public? Is it printed anywhere that you know so and so is delinquent in their bills? 29 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Sarah Lietz: Okay that's good. That's good to hear. I just wanted to clarify because I heard a couple of different things and is that your decision then or is parks and rec? Who makes that final call? Mayor Laufenburger: I would say that the City Council will make that final call because of the visibility of this. Because of the nature of this. The City Council would make that final call but Mr. Hoffman is doing his job by exploring options and presenting those options to the council. Sarah Lietz: And that's great and I think there's a lot of great ideas out there. I too very supportive of archery. My husband and I both own bows. It would be great if it could stay in our back yard but it is not safe to be in our back yard so I appreciate the comments during the work session as well. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright thank you. Sarah Lietz: I also wanted to let you know I did start an online petition recently and it already has 25 signatures on it. Mayor Laufenburger: Good. Sarah Lietz: I don't know if you want a copy of it or if you'd like me to email that to you or what you would like. Mayor Laufenburger: You can let Mr. Gerhardt have that information and he'll make sure that City Council has that. Thank you Ms. Lietz. Sarah Lietz: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: There being no other visitor presentations I will close visitor presentation and I want to say especially thanks to Sarah Duffey for being here this evening. Future council member perhaps. Alright. Let's move to the next item on our agenda. PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM REZONING, SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT, AND PARKING RESOLUTION. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Campion you made that, you made the modification so I'm going to turn to you and ask you in accordance with strict adherence to Robert's Rules of Order I'm going to ask that you make a motion. If there is a second then we will conduct discussion on the motion. Councilman Campion: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: You comfortable with that? C Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Councilman Campion: I think so. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council. Just to. Kate Aanenson: Can I give an update? Yeah. Todd Gerhardt: Help council member Campion I'm having out some new site plan improvements, the resolution and modifying the no parking on McGlynn Drive and also a copy of the proposed ordinance. Kate Aanenson: If I may Mayor then. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay go ahead. Kate Aanenson: Based on your comments. Councilwoman Tjornhom: If I could stop you, we're one short when it comes to the ordinance amendment. Todd Gerhardt: Here we go. Kate Aanenson: Make sure everyone's got one. So based on the comments in the work session the PUD ordinance was modified. Again busing only until the entire parking lot's completed which would be, appears to be next spring sometime. We also added the landscaping requirement along the east side of Audubon. Some of the conditions went away that had been met. I think that's the just, I'm not sure if I missed anything else Roger on the PUD. Roger Knutson: On the PUD ordinance the only change is in paragraph, on page 2, paragraph E with the addition of paragraph 5 on the landscaping. And paragraph F, parking was rewritten. We had steps before you could do this, that and the other thing. Now we're requiring this requires all the parking improvements to be constructed including the 230 spaces and until everything is constructed provides, until all the parking requirements have been constructed all access to the site shall be by bus with the exception of handicapped, employees, press and contractors. Councilman Campion: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay before I restate that to you Mr. Campion, we now have in front of us a revised ordinance. A revised Site Improvement Performance Agreement. By the way the ordinance includes a Findings of Fact is that correct Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Your motion would, yeah. Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So we have in the one document we have stapled together the ordinance, Findings of Fact, the Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and the resolution establishing a no parking zone on McGlynn Road from Audubon Road to the cul-de-sac. Kate Aanenson: Correct. If I may mayor then on the Site Improvement Performance Agreement what was added would be under required improvements would be landscaping be planted along Audubon per the PUD. Councilwoman Ryan: So you'd take out 2D? Kate Aanenson: No 2D. Councilwoman Ryan: Of the performance agreement. Kate Aanenson: No they'd still have to be, all those sidewalks, internal sidewalks. Councilwoman Ryan: Oh internal sidewalks. Kate Aanenson: And that may be resolved the way they've laid it out it looks like that may be resolved. We did find internal sidewalks but if there needs to be some, yeah. That could. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: But this sidewalk is not external so if you want to clarify that. Councilwoman Ryan: Well I thought because I thought that we were taking the sidewalk was going to go away on the east side of. Kate Aanenson: Yeah this was an internal one. Actually when we walked the site last, a week ago there is an internal sidewalk there between where the customers come out and where they go around to the front so. Councilwoman Ryan: So can we just clarify that? Kate Aanenson: Yeah I think the issue there was walking between the two but there is a place for that to happen so if you want to strike that that's fine. Councilwoman Ryan: Or just identify where the sidewalk. Kate Aanenson: Internal. Let's put internal sidewalks. Councilman Campion: So if I. 10 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Just a moment. Ms. Aanenson I just, I want to clarify something. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: You have provided an additional item that was not in the original PUD discussion and that is this establishing a no parking zone on McGlynn Road from Audubon Road to the cul-de-sac. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Right? Okay. Mr. Knutson, I'm not opposed to that being subject of discussion tonight but I'm uncomfortable that we're adding that to something that was not on the agenda earlier. Give me your thoughts on that. Roger Knutson: You certainly can add it if you chose to. If you're not comfortable doing it you don't have to. This is not something we need an agreement on by the, by Paisley Park. This is. Mayor Laufenburger: This is a public thoroughfare. Roger Knutson: Right. Mayor Laufenburger: This is city authority. Roger Knutson: Right, this is your jurisdiction. You can adopt it tonight or you can adopt it any night you want to and you can repeal it at any time you want to for that matter. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright. Todd Gerhardt: Public hearing isn't required mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: It is not required? Roger Knutson: It is not required. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Mr. Campion let me return to you for just a moment. You have a motion in front of you on the screen in front of you that does not include the resolution on the no parking zone right? So I'm. Kate Aanenson: I added it. Todd Gerhardt: It's in the second sentence. 11 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Is it identified in here? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Councilman Campion: As the parking resolution. Kate Aanenson: Parking resolution. Mayor Laufenburger: Where is that? Todd Gerhardt: Look on your screen. Kate Aanenson: It's on the screen. Councilman Campion: Last line. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh and parking resolution. Okay so it's been added and it would be your choice if you would like to make this motion as it showed on the screen or you can make any motion you choose but I'm turning to you because you were the one that asked for the modification to the agenda. Councilman Campion: Okay. Yeah personally I would like it included so I like it as written. Mayor Laufenburger: You make your motion as you choose. Councilman Campion: So I move that the city, the Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and adoption of the attached PUD ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, parking resolution and Findings of Fact. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay thank you Mr. Campion. Mr. Knutson do we have a valid motion? Roger Knutson: Mayor you do. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you. Is there a second to this motion? There being no second this motion fails for lack of a second. Is there any other action the council would like to take tonight? Roger Knutson: Mayor if you're not going to take action I suggest to make things clear that you table action on this. Mayor Laufenburger: Is that motion still in effect? That action still in effect? 12 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Roger Knutson: No. Since you've already, there's a motion been introduced. I think just to make things perfectly clear you want a motion to table if that's what you want. Mayor Laufenburger: Well I'm trying to understand council's interest here. Earlier there was a suggestion to modify the agenda and that was approved and I can only assume that council is not comfortable with the motion that was made. Is there any other motion that would like to be made? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Mr. Mayor I'd like to make a motion that we once again table this until our next council meeting. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And that would be October 24"i. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Is there a second to that motion? Councilwoman Ryan: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright we have a motion and a second to table this until October 24a . Is there any discussion? Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: There is. Is there a opportunity, because I'll speak to your question mayor because I know we had a lengthy work session around it and got a lot of answers, or questions answered. Is there an opportunity to grant another temporary permit for other days or is that open for discussion? And the reason why I'm asking is because I think we, my biggest concern after what I saw on Saturday is I think that there needs to be more understanding of the traffic impact. Whether it's buses coming down Park Road. Coming off of 5. Some of the back up's. Some of the confusion that I saw I think it's important, I understand that part of seeing that is going to be having the museum open and so instead of waiting for it to be, to rezone and have it permanently be open if we could have those traffic studies set up and have a better understanding of the impacts to that area while it's, while it's operating under a temporary permit, I think that would be really helpful to me to have a better understanding of you know what's being reported back to staff and then we get that report so we can make better decisions based on the impact to that area versus just rezoning everything and moving forward, let's really take a look at what the impact is with some of these new bus routes and what not. Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. McDonald. 13 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Councilman McDonald: What it sounds like Councilwoman Ryan is proposing is another motion and I guess I would encourage her to put it that way because that is another option so that would be another motion on the table to deal with this. Mayor Laufenburger: Well the truth is, we have an active motion to table. Table this action and so we will act on that first and then another motion could be made, is that correct Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: That's correct Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so let's, I want to try to answer your or get an answer to your question. Mr. Gerhardt what are the options available to this council to grant the equivalent of a temporary status for a period of time to explore this and I think I believe Councilwoman Ryan's concern is, let's see what happens before we grant a permanent status, is that correct? Councilwoman Ryan: Correct, yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so Mr. Gerhardt what are some options for us? Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council. I granted a 3 day temporary event permit to Paisley Park. I do not feel comfortable granting another temporary. If the council would like to grant another temporary permit you could take that action up tonight. You would have to modify your agenda to do that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so what you're saying is you acted administratively within your authority to grant 3 days of special permit or temporary permit to conduct Paisley Park as a museum, is that correct? Todd Gerhardt: That's correct Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: And you don't feel that it's in your administrative authority to grant that any further? Todd Gerhardt: No I do not. Mayor Laufenburger: So you're asking council, if council wants to grant you that authority. Todd Gerhardt: No I'm saying if the council would like to give a 3 day permit they could do that. Mayor Laufenburger: How about a 4 day? How about a 4 day permit or a 5 or a 6 or a 7 day? Todd Gerhardt: That would need to get direction from the City Attorney. 14 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Knutson is that, is that latitude that the City Council has? Roger Knutson: I'll have to look at your city code. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Mr. Mayor if I may. Mayor Laufenburger: Yes Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I made the motion to table it. I first did not support the resolution or adding it onto the agenda to start with and I think one of my main reasons why is, excuse me. I'm suffering from a cold. When we started this work session we held it in this room for the reason because the public needed to be here. We wanted to make sure they had room to be here. Mayor Laufenburger: Right. Councilwoman Tjornhom: But it was expressed to them that it was just a work session. Very informal and we asked them to please be silent while we conducted our business and we had discussions with staff, applicant and council. Mayor Laufenburger: Sure. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Once that happened then all of a sudden that door got closed for anybody else to make any sort of opinion or suggestion because. Mayor Laufenburger: Wait, when you say anybody else you mean anybody in the public, is that what you're saying? Councilwoman Tjornbom: Yeah because you know they, the residents heard that we were going to put it on the agenda and I think they just assumed that it was going to pass and so we lost out on that opportunity for our residents to tell what they're thinking. What they want for our community, especially because a lot of them lived through it this weekend and then to have us just shut it down after we told them relax. It's just a work session. Informal discussion. And then changing the rules I think that was not acting in the best public policy. Mayor Laufenburger: When you say changing the rules to what are you referring Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Well this was a work session. Mayor Laufenburger: Are you referring to my opening comments? 15 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Councilwoman Tjornhom: (Yes). Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Because we did not say this is subject to change at any time so please stay here because then we will have during our normal council agenda have opportunities for you to come and speak. They were not alerted of that and so I just think this is being, I've always said it's been rushed from the start and now it's being rushed even further because we've all been, as we discussed inundated with emails and it's emotional. It's emotional reading the people that have planned honeymoons. Vacation. They've spent thousands of dollars on not just rickets to Paisley Park but on hotels and car rentals and airfare and so I think we all feel a need to help them at some point but I think we first need to make sure, as I said last time at this meeting, that we need to get it right the first time and so I just feel there's a little injustice done tonight by having a work session. Telling people they can't talk and then they left. I just think due process was not done. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay I appreciate your comments regarding that Councilwoman Tjornhom. I think it's important to note that when we have work session there are people that often come to that work session but they often come to listen and generally speaking, don't ask me to put a percentage on this but generally speaking the public does not participate in that and there are other ways that the public does participate in the process that we have. Before I ... your comment further I am absolutely not opposed to public comment but I am in my responsibility, I have a responsibility to conduct a meeting in a manner that is orderly and efficient and I think I was very generous with public comment on October 3`a. Cut off no public comment and that was during a session when it's not required that we conduct a public hearing so while I appreciate your opinion I don't happen to agree with you about the public process. Would anybody else like to make a comment about that? Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: I would like to comment. I was under the impression that I was following due process. That that was the process to get it back on the agenda. We discussed it at the work session. We shared opinions. It sounded like there was, though we don't vote at work sessions it sounded like there was some agreement that you know going to a busing only option until the parking improvements were made. There was some buy into that. At least it was something that appealed to me. That's why I brought the motion. Obviously we've been in communication with many from the public. Hundreds of emails I would say and phone calls over the past week so I guess I object to the comment that we're not following due process. And I would say that indefinitely tabling this, how do you know when it's going to be on the agenda? Mayor Laufenburger: Well the motion, just to clarify the motion states. Councilman Campion: But I'm saying prior to, prior to tonight it was simply open ended right? Mayor Laufenburger: That's true. IG7 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: That's true. Councilman Campion: It was indefinitely tabled and so at that point I was trying to get it back on the agenda. Mayor Laufenburger: Anybody any other comments? Todd Gerhardt: The public hearing was held at the Planning Commission level. That's the time when the public can add their comments. Mayor Laufenburger: Public hearing. Public hearing. Just a moment. Anybody else? Mr. McDonald or Ms. Ryan want to make any comment? Councilman McDonald: Well I'd like to hear what Mr. Knutson found. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, Mr. Knutson. Roger Knutson: Mayor, members of the council. Pursuant to city code Section 6-3 you could issue the permit. Mayor Laufenburger: We could issue a temporary permit. Roger Knutson: Yes. For a period of time you think is appropriate. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, well that's good to know. Councilwoman Ryan: And do we have to identify the number of days or just a temporary permit and then that's discussion between staff and the applicant? Roger Knutson: If you're going to issue the permit you have to say what period it covers. What days it covers. Mayor Laufenburger: And is it possible to stipulate that being up to an end date? Anything we want. Roger Knutson: Word it the way you want. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Any other comment on the motion to table this action until October 24th? Okay we have a motion and a second to table this action. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilwoman Ryan seconded that the Chanhassen City Council table the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from 17 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and adoption of the attached PUD ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, parking resolution and Findings of Fact. Councilwoman Tjornhom voted in favor, the rest voted in opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 1 to 4. Mayor Laufenburger: That motion fails. Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor I'd like to make a motion please. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: I would like to make a motion that we issue. Mayor Laufenburger: Just before you do this, just make sure you state your motion and not the arguments why or not okay. Councilwoman Ryan: Correct. I'd like to make the motion that the Chanhassen City Council issues a temporary permit to Paisley Park, should I identify exactly the? Mayor Laufenburger: How about Bremer Trust? Councilwoman Ryan: Yeah who do we issue the permit to? Bremer Trust? Mayor Laufenburger: Kate who. Todd Gerhardt: It's in the sign page of the site plan agreement. I don't have one. Roger Knutson: Mayor can I ask a question? Under the administrative permit how many days can you issue them for? Kate Aanenson: Did you say Chapter 6? Roger Knutson: 6-3 doesn't apply. Kate Aanenson: Thank you. Roger Knutson: That's water permits. Kate Aanenson: Okay right. Roger Knutson: Under administrative permits how many days do you allow? 18 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Kate Aanenson: Typically we do 15 but they can only be so many consecutive so going back to what Mr. Gerhardt said would be the correct interpretation so we would, you can only do so many consecutive because then it's no longer a temporary event so historically if they would have maybe 11 left, to only let so many do a year. For example you typically maybe do one a month but, so historically we've done, you can do so many consecutive days. Usually not more than 72 hours concurrently so. Roger Knutson: And how many a year? Kate Aanenson: 15. Roger Knutson: So that'd be my recommendation. Kate Aanenson: They've already used 3 of them so. Roger Knutson: So 12 more days. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Just to clarify. That would be an administrative permit correct? Roger Knutson: You're directing. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Maybe what we need to do is you make your motion and we'll discuss it okay. Todd Gerhardt: Paisley Park. Councilman McDonald: It's Paisley Park Facilities LLC. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay thank you. I'd like to make a motion that the Chanhassen City Council issues Paisley Park Facility LLC a temporary permit for 12 days. Mayor Laufenburger: And this is a permit to do what? Councilwoman Ryan: Operate the museum with busing only. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So your motion is that the Chanhassen City Council grant to Paisley Park Facility LLC a temporary permit for 12 days to operate the museum with busing only. Roger Knutson: Do you want to make an exception for handicap, press, contractors and employees? 19 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Councilwoman Ryan: Yes. Councilman McDonald: That was my question. If you except that for Uber and taxis. Councilwoman Ryan: Yes, yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. I believe we have a valid motion. Is there a second to that motion? Councilman McDonald: I'll second it. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. McDonald thank you very much. Now any discussion? Councilman McDonald: Yes Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Okay we have a motion now for at least 12 days worth of operation. At what point would the criteria be to bring it back to council to again look at whether or not we make it permanent? Is there any thought on that? Mayor Laufenburger: Well here's how, do you want to try to interpret that for us Mr. Knutson? I mean what happens after 12 days? Roger Knutson: Then they no longer have a permit to do it. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so after 12 days they no longer have a permit and then would they have to make reapplication for a PUD or does the application for PUD remains in place? Roger Knutson: It remains in place. You've not acted on it. You've not said yes. You've not said no. It's pending. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so the motion to act on the PUD, because it did not receive a second, it remains an application with the City? Roger Knutson: Yes. It has not been decided. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Does that answer your question Mr. McDonald? Roger Knutson: And even to make that even clearer, whether this motion passes or not, if you're not going to act on the PUD tonight I suggest you move to table action on these items. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh on this, on this specific item that's on the screen. O Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. If we don't table it what would happen? Roger Knutson: I would recommend you do that otherwise there might be some ambiguity. Mayor Laufenburger: I see, okay. Alright. Mr. McDonald I think you still have a question? Councilman McDonald: I think I got my question answered. I think what it comes down to is I'm looking for an end date and I guess there is no answer to that. Mayor Laufenburger: Well I perhaps I would disagree and Mr. Knutson I need you to listen carefully to this. While I appreciate that the administratively 12 more days are left in the 15, isn't it true that the City Council could say temporary permit to operate until end date? Roger Knutson: 15 days is it. Mayor Laufenburger: That's all we, that's the only authority that we have? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. There that's your end date Mr. McDonald. Your end date would be 12 more days of temporary permit and as far as what those days are Ms. Aanenson I believe you, when the application was made you told them that they could choose the 3 days, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilman McDonald: So at this point they can choose 12 days between now and December 23'd if I understand correctly because. Todd Gerhardt: If that's included in Councilmember Ryan's motion. Councilman McDonald: Well what happened to the motion that got tabled last time? There was a deadline put on that one. Roger Knutson: That's, if I remember right it's about December 22nd or 23d. Councilman McDonald: 23d yeah. 21 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Roger Knutson: So you have to act on their application by that date or it's deemed approved. Councilman McDonald: So the end date's December 23rd. They can have any 12 days between now and then if that's what they so choose, am I correct in that assumption? Mayor Laufenburger: Then let's handle this properly. We have a motion right now that says that the, that the City Council approve the temporary permit to operate the museum by busing for 12 days. By busing with the exception as noted. That's the motion that we have right now and if you want to put the motion, those 12 days be used or that the temporary permit not be issued after December 231 that would be an amendment to this motion. But before you do that I would like, I don't want to deter your amendment Mr. McDonald but I would like to hear from some other council members first. Are you okay with that? Councilman McDonald: I'm fine with that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Thank you to those people in the council chambers for allowing us the opportunity to do this right. Is there any other comment regarding the motion? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Mr. Mayor this just to me seems, and forgive me for being so informal but really sloppy policy making. We either confirm it or we deny it but stretching it out until December 23rd, I just think it's not fair to the applicant. It's not fair to us. It's not fair to the residents. I think we could make a valid choice by our next council meeting and that would really end this and people could then move on either with Paisley Park carrying on or else it didn't. Mayor Laufenburger: As a museum or not. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yep. Yep and so I just think that while I respect the motion that's being made I just think it's in everyone's best interest to just go back to settling this at the next council meeting like should have happened at the very beginning tonight. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilwoman Ryan did you want to make a comment? Councilwoman Ryan: I did and I know that we decided on 12 days because they only used 3 but in looking at my calendar our next meeting is October 24`" so that's within 14 days so if we give, granting them the 12 day permit they could operate the facility for the next 12 days. They could give us, or collect information that we're looking for, or that I'm looking for in terms of traffic impacts to the area and then, and why I seconded your motion the first time on the 24'h is because I don't want this to keep going on and on. I think people do deserve an answer. Our community does. The people traveling from all over. The management team. Staff. Everybody deserves that so I think by collecting information over the course of the next 12 days which then would still fall in the 14 days we could get this back on our agenda by October 24's. Have some real information that I think we're all looking for and then we can, or at least what I'm really 22 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 looking for, I can make an informed decision on the impact to the community. We can hear from people and then we can make that decision on the 24' and that's why I said 12 days because it was the most we could do but it still fell within the 14 of the 2 weeks. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilwoman Ryan: So I could change my motion to say you know for the next 12 days with bringing it back to council on October. Tabling it. I wonder if I can make. Mayor Laufenburger: No. We're going to deal with one motion at a time Ms. Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: So if, so you're essentially advocating that let's leave it at 12 days. Let the operator choose what those 12 days are and then you're also inclined to in the future, maybe perhaps even later tonight stipulate a time that we act on this but you're in favor of just leaving it at the 12 days. Councilwoman Ryan: Right. With the encouragement of using those 12 days within the next 14. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Anybody else? Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: I support that. Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor then are you willing to accept an amendment? Mayor Laufenburger: Well you can make your amendment and the council will decided whether or not they will accept it. Councilman McDonald: I would like to make a friendly. Mayor Laufenburger: Just call it an amendment. Councilman McDonald: I'll make an amendment to Councilwoman Ryan's motion that this does come back to the council at our next meeting on the 24th for resolution and that the 12 days permit be issued and the operator can choose which 12 days within the next 14 they choose to operate. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. Before I mention whether we have a valid amendment Mr. Knutson, does that satisfy your, is the language of Mr. McDonald's amendment to this motion satisfy your need to have a definitive date? 23 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 Roger Knutson: Mayor I think it does but just to be clear on the amendment. Councilmember what you're saying is, the PUD rezoning, site findings would all come to your next City Council meeting as part of your motion. You can do that. Councilman McDonald: Yes Mr. Knutson. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. So we have an amendment stipulating that the PUD, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, parking resolution and Findings of Fact return to the council on October 24`s. Is there a second to that amendment? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Tjornhom spoke first Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: Which is fine. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright is there any further discussion on the amendment? We're voting only on the amendment at this time. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approve an amendment to table the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and adoption of the attached PUD ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, parking resolution and Findings of Fact to October 24, 2016. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: The amendment carries. The motion now reads grant a temporary permit for 12 days and return the PUD action to the council on October 20. Is there any further discussion on the amended motion? Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the Chanhassen City Council grant to Paisley Park Facility LLC a temporary permit for 12 days to operate the museum with busing only, with the exception for handicap, press, contractors, employees and taxis, and with the amendment to table the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and adoption of the attached PUD ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, parking resolution and Findings of Fact to October 24, 2016. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: That motion carries 5-0. We have final action for this evening unless there's any further motion at this time. Okay, thank you council. Ms. Aanenson I would direct 24 Chanhassen City Council — October 10, 2016 you to issue the permit as appropriate based on your discussions with Paisley Park Facility LLC and Mr. Gerhardt will you ensure that this matter returns to the council agenda on October 24`s with all the materials as were presented? Todd Gerhardt: Yes Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you very much. Thank you council members for your patience in this deliberation. We will now move to item G-1. 6845 LAKE HARRISON CIRCLE: VARIANCE REOUEST TO BUILD A PAVER PATIO AROUND A POOL AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6845 LAKE HARRISON CIRCLE, LOT 2, BLOCK 2 LAKE HARRISON. Mayor Laufenburger: Do we have a staff report? Kate Aanenson: Before I'd like to introduce MacKenzie Walters, our staff planner. Been with us. MacKenzie Walters: 3 months. Kate Aanenson: 3 months so this is his first presentation to the City Council. Mayor Laufenburger: Welcome Mr. Walters. Nice to have you with us tonight. MacKenzie Walters: Pleasure to be here. So as was mentioned this is Planning Case 2016-22. 6845 Lake Harrison Circle variance. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this variance on September 20'. They voted to deny the variance request. The applicant appealed the variance and it is now on the agenda for today. They have also submitted a revised variance application and they are now proposing an 800 square foot paver patio pool area. The location of the property is 6845 Lake Harrison Circle, indicated in red. The area is zoned single family residential. The zoning has a stipulated maximum lot coverage of 25 percent. Minimum 15,000 square foot lots. 30 foot front and rear setbacks and properties also have 10 foot side yard setbacks. Block 2 of the Lake Harrison subdivision has a blanket 5 foot front yard variance in part to provide some relief from the large wetland that is in the back of all the properties. 6845 Lake Harrison Circle is also located within the Shoreland Management Overlay District. This district is 1,000 zone around all of the lakes in the city and it has a maximum of 25 percent impervious coverage. I mentioned that behind the property was a wetland. The wetland is classified as Manage 1. As the property is currently platted it has a 20 foot existing wetland barrier. I'm sorry buffer which you see in red and a 40 foot building setback so every building has to be set back a minimum of 40 feet from the current buffer. The applicant has the ability under the city zoning code to establish instead a 25 foot buffer with native vegetation that meets modem standards and in exchange for that they would be allowed to place accessory structures so like pools, patios, decks, things of that nature within, they would only have a 15 foot setback 25 k CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Paul Oehme, Kate Aanenson, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Kim Huston Kristin Kokkila Anna Bader Denise Choiniere Teawanna Burton Letitia Nadine Dyer Nardos Yeuie Sheila Clayton Linda Paul Lisa Gillespie Erin Adler Matt Sepir 18977 Twilight Trail, Eden Prairie 13875 85'b Place No., Maple Grove 18903 Hanus Road, Minnetonka 8481 Bittern Court, Chanhassen 3425 53i4 Avenue No, Minneapolis 8280 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen 312 Larpenture #6 1074 1" #708, St. Paul 8696 Stonefield Lane, Chanhassen 183 West Sidney Street, St. Paul Star Tribune MPR Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you and I want to welcome all of those of you that are in council chambers tonight and if it's the first time into Chanhassen, welcome to Chanhassen and there are many of you watching at home on Mediacom cable channel or also watching live stream so welcome to this proceeding. First thing I want to note is that we have all council members present this evening so we are a full quorum. We also have City Manager Todd Gerhardt and our lawyer, attorney Mr. Roger Knutson and you'll be meeting and hearing from other members of the city staff and consultants in a little bit. This is a City Council meeting and we have a normal and orderly process that we follow and I hope to make it easy for those of you to follow along as we navigate through this process together. The primary purpose of this meeting tonight is to act on or to review and consider an act on a proposal to rezone property located at 7801 Audubon Road from Industrial Office Park to a Planned Unit Development to facilitate the use of the building as a museum. We will hence forth refer to this as Paisley Park okay. But the first item on our agenda is a little different. It is our custom here in Chanhassen whenever we have a council meeting we offer the opportunity for a visitor presentation so if anyone wishes to speak to or address the council tonight on a matter unrelated to the specific item, Paisley Park on the SC/��NED Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 It 1 agenda, now would be a time to do so. Now some of you are thinking I wanted to speak tonight. Is the time that I'm supposed to get up and do that and the answer is no. We're welcome to hear from you about any other item except Paisley Park. If you want to tell us about the food you had at Davanni's today or how much you like the Arboretum fine. Alright there being no visitor presentations we will close visitor presentations. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM: REOUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7801 AUDUBON ROAD FROM INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK (IOP) TO PLANNED UNIT_ DEVELOPMENT IOP TO FACILITATE THE USE OF THE BUILDING AS A MUSEUM. Mayor Laufenburger: Just a brief comment on our role as a City Council this evening. The action that we as a City Council take is called legislative. That means the council will decide if the proposed ordinance will be approved or not. If that legislative action or approval is complete then there's a second element to the opening of the museum called administrative. This is the responsibility of city staff and not the council so city staff ensures that the actions by the applicant to prepare the site for it's approved use complies with city ordinances and city code such as are the emergency lights in place and are they functional. Are the emergency exits clearly marked and identified? Are the assembly ratings and the occupancy signs in place? Are all of the conditions of the use satisfactorily met according to city staff So these elements are related to granting a certificate of occupancy and these administrative actions are not the council's jurisdiction. So this is the sequence of events we're going to follow tonight. First of all I will ask for a staff report for the application and the proposal for rezoning to a planned unit development and this will be very thorough so it will be time consuming. Number two, after that staff report is complete I will ask council members if they have any questions. This is customary. There may be things that they read in the report that are unclear to them. Maybe things we hear tonight so that will be very, very thorough. That will be council questions. I will then ask if the applicant is present, and I believe the applicant is present tonight and I would ask if they would like to address the council. They will then come up and make a statement as they choose. Then I will return it to the council and say any questions for the applicant. Now this is a standard process that we use for virtually every development or anything like this so we're following a procedure here. Now I also just want to remind people, after we ask the applicant if there's any questions then we have to remember this. The council has had an opportunity to review all matters of the public record including the proceedings from the Planning Commission held on September 20th. Some may have actually viewed that Planning Commission meeting. We also have verbatim minutes for that. We've also reviewed all of the emails. In some cases people may follow social media but we've reviewed all of those proceedings and at this time I would normally say a public hearing is not required because that was part of the Planning Commission meeting but I know there are people here tonight who have an interest in sharing their views so I will take a period of public comment. The only request that I ask is that as you speak to the council, remember you're addressing the council, you treat us with respect due of 2 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 the council, the applicant and also this chamber. Also one more thing, if there's anybody present tonight that spoke at the Planning Commission I would ask that you reserve your comments until those who were not at the Planning Commission and spoke have a chance to speak. I will do this for about 30 minutes. I'll be a little flexible on that but it's important that we listen to and hear the things that are said as long as they're presented in a respectful way. And then when the public comment is concluded then I will bring it back to the council for any further discussion, motion or action so that's the sequence of events tonight. So let's begin. Our first item is under new business is the Paisley Park Museum. Is there a staff report? Kate Aanenson: Yes thank you Mayor and members of the City Council. As you indicated everything on this project has been disseminated. I also want to remind people that the city staff report is available online. Anybody that has questions about some of the technicalities so what we gave to you tonight is an executive summary. Included in that was emails that we received after the Planning Commission meeting. With the Planning Commission meeting that staff report is attached also. There were numerous emails sent and so all the emails that we did receive were also attached. So also included in that is the proposed zoning. Some other documents which I'll go through in a minute but all those are part of the record and anybody that's interested in that can go to the City's website and navigate to find that. So again the Planning Commission held a hearing on September 20' and I'll go through a little bit more detail on that and the application is from PRN Music Corporation. The property is located at the southeast comer of Highway 5 and Audubon Boulevard. It is a 9 acre site. Paisley Park was built in 1986. There's been a few alterations to it since that time and the addition of a small out building which we'll talk about in a little bit more detail. So the goal here is to, the majority of the site will not be altered. There will be some provisions for additional site planning which we'll detail in a little bit more later and then also potential for some security items. So the request for the PUD zoning district arose from the fact that the museum is not permitted in the current office industrial park. This property is guided for office industrial so by creating a PUD which is allowed if it's a 5 acre or more larger site is permitted as long as it's consistent with the underlying guiding which this is. So the PUD rezoning attempts to regulate how this property will be used so as a part of your packet then we included the PUD zoning district. There was some changes from this before it went to Planning Commission and I can go through that if you will just really quickly. Offices were added as a permitted use in the zoning district when it went to Planning Commission that was not there. So that was the main change in that, in the PUD zoning district. Again the PUD zoning district is to allow the museum which could have, which also allowed for other things that could happen in the IOP district including 20 percent retail sales which we allow in other industrial office districts and then also permitted the, it being used as a recording studio if that's what they choose to. To allow the current use of the property and then modifying that with that. The other thing that was presented when we asked them for a business plan was the existing round building on the site. To allow that to potentially become a boutique hotel. Again that would come back through the city for administratively, internally for the building permit so they'd have to go through that process so again any changes to that again would have to come back through the city. Again there's prohibited uses. It's not intended to have outdoor events, liquor sales or anything like that so we believe that the PUD is the 3 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 appropriate tool to allow this application to go forward as a museum. In the executive summary on the beginning, first page we did talk about reasons why we did support the PUD. It provides for limitations on the building and how it can be used, hours of operation and traffic and parking and we'll get a little bit more detail from the traffic consultant on that. Again that was to understand how the change in use and the occupancy would regulate how the building works. It preserves the existing building and how it exists today and there's limited expansion. Preserves existing trees. Creates additional jobs and tourism will be created. So that's the reasons for supporting the PUD. This is how the site looks today. The current layout of the building so looking at the traffic study there was recommendations being made. I went through the PUD but one of the things that we talked about in the traffic study was some changes that need to be made to the site and the conveyance tool for that to make sure that they got done is on this slide here. We did reference, we put together a site performance agreement. In that agreement the concern was, it said we can measure the traffic into the future. Level of service. How it's operating. Right now there's certain expectations. I'll let the traffic consultant talk about that in more detail but assume maximum development and operational. So we'd go back and measure that. Security has been put in place. There was a security requirement so there is cash escrow in place with the City right now to maintain that so what the agreement says is that as a part of the ordinance that we would measure that, how it's operating so if it appeared that it was maxing capacity and we wanted to look at some improvements of the level of service then we would study that. At a minimum we'd go back and study it in October but if we needed to do it sooner than that then we'd have that opportunity too which is why the escrow is put in place. In addition that escrow ensures that the improvements are being made to the site including the additional parking and the additional access onto Audubon. Again I'll let the consultant talk a little bit more detail in that. Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: When you use the term level of service, are you referring to car traffic? Is that what you're referring to? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, vehicular, car or bus traffic. How people are exiting and entering the site and how the rest of the operations work on the road. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you. Kate Aanenson: So that's one of the attachments then. This site improvement agreement is one of the attachments that will be executed as a part of this PUD agreement. The zoning itself, the zoning ordinance is what we're also recommending tonight so with that I'm going to turn it over to the City Engineer to go through the traffic. 4 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Paul Oehme: Thanks Ms. Aanenson. Good evening Mayor, City Council members. So we'd like to just spend a little time on the traffic study as Ms. Aanenson had indicated. Traffic study was, is typically completed for these type of developments and change of usage as well. SRF did complete the traffic study for this development. Tonight Matt Pacyna is here from SRF if you have any questions for him. One of the first things that we look at for traffic study is looking at the, is what the new site would generate in terms of traffic so based upon information that we gathered from the applicant there'd be upwards of 65 guests per hour maximum visiting the site and a 10 minute tour basis. We're estimating that about 2.5 guests per vehicle would be entering the site and then upwards of 60 employees would also be working on the site on any given day. Based upon that information we did also gather site information with gathering trips and turning movements at the intersections off Highway 5 and at the intersections along Audubon Road as well. Knowing the background traffic information too that MnDOT has and also that the City acquires every 2 years, we looked at that information. Put it into a computer model and generated what projected traffic volumes along Audubon and turning movements into the site and along Highway 5 would be. This slide here shows what the existing traffic volumes currently are and what the projected maximum trip generated volumes would be if the PUD for Paisley Park were to move forward. As Kate indicated this is the concept plan that is being looked at. I'll get back to that slide a little bit later on but knowing that traffic, those traffic impacts or the traffic that's been generated we looked at what the potential impacts along Audubon, Highway 5 and then also on Paisley Park potentially would be knowing the, putting that information into the model. For example at Audubon, Highway 5, the guest traffic going southbound onto Audubon making those turning movements into the site there potentially would be a queuing issue. Basically a back up onto Highway 5 at the weekend peak period timeframe or the weekday which is, we're projecting it to be at 4:30. Between 4:30 and 5:30. The problem with the traffic and the queuing at this intersection, at this time is that the intersection or the main access point to Paisley Park is in close proximity to Highway 5 so there's not much stacking that potentially could take place along Audubon as it is currently configured. This potentially would impact the traffic again on Highway 5. Saturdays we also are anticipating there might be some problems as well during the noon hour based upon the traffic volumes. Existing traffic volumes plus the generated traffic volumes for the guests. So what staff is recommending basically that the north access point, which is shown right here, that be moved farther to the south about 220 feet away from Highway 5. That gets the access point out of the turn lane. The right tum lane that's currently on Highway 5. That access point would be proposed to be restricted just to right out only since we do have a left turn lane that potentially would be going in there at that location. We also would like it to restripe Audubon Road south of Highway 5 to allow for more stacking to get into the facility. The main access point to the facility would be the south access point that is currently here today. As Ms. Aanenson had indicated that connection would be parking lot, the south parking lot would be connected with the north parking lot to facilitate parking for guests and that would be the main location. The limit of the tour sizes for the facility onto the existing parking spots that are currently available. In the future the parking could be expanded on site to accommodate more guests but at this point we would request that the parking, the guests would be limited to the amount of parking that's available on the site as well. We have been in contact with MnDOT about the traffic potentially generated by this facility and they are 5 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 aware of the traffic study. They have a copy of it. What MnDOT would, could help out with is the timing of the left turn lanes onto Audubon Road. Their signal is tied into the main traffic center and the turning or the green arrows could potentially be adjusted during peak hours as well so MnDOT can monitor the traffic at this intersection if there were to be problems in the future. With that the site that is, site improvements are shown here again so the, again the access, main access would be to the south. South access point is currently today. The north access be closed and the right in or right out lane would be constructed at this location since there is a left turn lane that would be obstructed. Additionally parking potentially would be added in the future as needed by the applicant. Kate Aanenson: Thank you Paul. Just a couple other comments on the site plan itself and the Planning Commission summary. So the Planning Commission requested that you consider the proposed transportation plan. Not all of the parking will be put in place as shown on this rendering. This is the ultimate. That was one of the things the Planning Commission asked for too so it's referenced in the ordinance. This is the ultimate build out so right now anything that. Mayor Laufenburger: Just could you, when you say ultimate you're saying this is the completion of the buildout of the parking on this site, is that what you're saying? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: But at this time due to the time of year it's not feasible to get all that done. It ha been restriped which is one of our requirements. The other one we had is that they put a connection between this parking lot and this parking lot. Not all the parking in there but there is a connection which creates a circulation through. So the other one was that in order to accommodate guests coming to the site but not enough parking they would work through a transportation system and they have worked on that so as a part of that again the site improvement agreement, that's where the striping had to occur and then the additional improvements would have to be made that the City Engineer just went through so that's what the security is for to make sure those improvements are done next year because we're into winter time now so they just got what they need to to make the circulation work and the parking on site so it's pretty close as far as meeting the current demands of parking but if it were to continue to expand so those were the Planning Commission comments to make sure those had been done. There were some other ones regarding making Highway 5 the designated route. If you look at the traffic study I believe the majority of the traffic is coming from Highway 5 and if it's coming by bus that wouldn't be as many trips so with that recommend that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes and that you also approve the PUD ordinance, the adoption of the Findings of Fact and the site improvement, Site Improvement Performance Agreement. So with that I'd be happy to answer any questions that you have. I k Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Alright thank you Ms. Aanenson and Mr. Oehme. Let's bring this to the council. Let's begin with questions. Anybody have any questions? Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald, your questions please. Councilman McDonald: Yes. I guess the first one I have is for Kate about the PUD. Normally whenever we do these we're doing them for a reason of, there's some concession being made for a PUD. What are the concessions here if we grant the PUD for this site? Kate Aanenson: In your staff report that went to the Planning Commission I believe it's also in the updated staff report that you received separate from the executive summary. The findings for the PUD are in there starting on page 4 of the updated staff report. So because the site is not changing the characteristic, we're preserving the building and other existing characteristics so the only thing really that would be changing additional parking. Otherwise the trees and existing building are being maintained. If a different use went in there that could alter significantly. Again some of the PUD things are not necessarily applicable so high quality unique design. Again the building is unique in the city so this does again preserve the uniqueness of that building. It is guided office industrial and again it is creating, the PUD does, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan parks and open space, again preservation of existing trees. It's not necessarily applicable to the preservation of a park. Not applicable to affordable housing. Not applicable to energy efficiency and a traffic management, that's what we're getting. We're getting improved traffic management on the site with the implementation and the construction of the additional turn lanes and moving of that intersection. If you remember when this building was built in 1986 we upgraded Highway 5 and so additional right-of-way was taken along that, in front of the property so that northern entrance has always been close to that. Anybody else using that so because of the change in use in the PUD we were able to move that driveway. Well the driveway will be moved, the most northerly driveway will be moved south which as the traffic engineer indicated gives better access to the right hand turn. You're not in that turning lane which you are today. Councilman McDonald: Okay. Mr. Mayor if I could. Mayor Laufenburger: Please do. Please continue Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Also I've received a lot of emails as I'm sure you've received a lot of emails concerning the fence. The only thing about the fence that I guess I would ask is that are we as a City requiring the fence and what I mean by that is the opaque fence or is that a decision that the management company can make and all we're saying is we have ordinances about fences and you must follow those? Kate Aanenson: That's what we're saying. Nobody's requiring them to put up a fence. We want to put that in as an option because if they were to do something that's different than what's out there today they would need variances. Instead of coming back through a public hearing through a variance we wanted to put everybody on notice now that that could be. Certainly it's 7 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 not their first choice. We've heard from a lot of people on that. There's no requirement to put the fence up. It's an option as a way. What we are concerned about as they are concerned about is people that are walking up to the site and the traffic mingling. How do we manage that so it's, we'll observe it. That's part of the thing that we'll be doing over the next few months and see how it operations. We know that now that they've requested things not be put on the fence there's less walk up traffic and that's what we're just monitoring. Both parties are. We both want to make it a good neighbor. Councilman McDonald: Okay then in dealing with the fence the next question I have would go to Mr. Oehme. As Ms. Aanenson said we're going to monitor that. What are we looking for? To see what impact there is on Highway 5 and what safety there is as far as 5 is concerned? Paul Oehme: Correct. Not just Highway 5 Councilman McDonald but also Audubon Road as well. If there's any back up's. Queuing issues along Highway, on Audubon. If there's accidents that potentially could take place, we'll be monitoring all that information. Councilman McDonald: Okay. And then concerning Highway 5, do you know what the stacking capacity is of the tum lane on Highway 5? Matt Pacyna: Mr. Mayor, council members. My name's Matt Pacyna with SRF Consulting. I'm the traffic engineer that worked on the report. The westbound left turn lane today is in the 300 to 350 foot range on Highway 5 today. Mayor Laufenburger: So layman's term, how many cars is that? Matt Pacyna: We use a general rule of thumb about 20 feet per vehicle. 20 to 25 feet per vehicle so you can do the math. 12 to 16 vehicles. Mayor Laufenburger: You're better at math than I am Matt. Councilman McDonald: Well and on those vehicles what about a bus? What if we had all of the transit to and from that would be buses, do we reach any kind of capacity at that point? Matt Pacyna: Buses are typically a little bit longer. We usually use the rule of thumb of 2 buses, or 2 passenger vehicles for 1 bus as an equivalent. We didn't look specifically at if it was all buses coming in but typically that's less than the vehicles just from the amount of people that you can have on a bus in relation to how many cars you need to service the same amount of people. We do work with MnDOT on a regular basis and as Mr. Oehme mentioned MnDOT does have access to remotely control the signal timing at this location and they have indicated that they are willing to do that. Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Councilman McDonald: Okay because I was going to ask you to elaborate on that if it's a variable timing or if there's a way to change it based upon demand. Time of day and those things so there is that capability then. Matt Pacyna: Yes. Councilman McDonald: Then I was asking about Highway 5 and you got into the surrounding areas as far as traffic and such goes. In listening to the Planning Commission I understand that as cars come in that you know they are going to be searched. The question I have is then based upon that are we going to create a stacking problem then on Audubon and if so is the capacity there going to be sufficient to handle that and do you know how much time per vehicle they're going to be spending because that could relate to the stack up. Mayor Laufenburger: Before you answer that Mr. Pacyna, Mr. McDonald I think that the procedure that happens on site is probably best answered by the applicant so let's hear the applicant's description of what they're going to do on site and then if that still prompts the question of stacking on Audubon, you okay with that? Councilman McDonald: Well I'm okay with that. I just want to know if he knows if it was part of the study. If he doesn't that's all he's got to say and then I'll ask the applicant about that but I am concerned about the stacking if he's looked at that at all as to what impact that could have. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, okay. Mr. Pacyna. Matt Pacyna: Mr. Mayor, council members. That's a great question. In our conversations with the management team they did indicate that those ingress and egress situations would happen relatively quickly. That said we still wanted to be somewhat mindful of it and the striping recommendations and utilizing that south access point along Audubon were part of those ways to help protect against those queuing challenges that may occur if it takes longer than expected to service those vehicles as they're entering so having that restriping allows for those southbound left turning vehicles that are wanting to go into Paisley Park, that allows vehicles that are on Audubon to continue past them and not get blocked in that queue. We don't expect there to be any queuing issues but having that turn lane striped helps provide some of that buffer. Councilman McDonald: Okay and then on the issue of not necessarily people into Paisley Park but people just wanting to walk up to the fence or walk around the property, a lot of parking is taking place on McGlynn Road. Was that factored into your study at all as to what kind of traffic we might be looking at there? Matt Pacyna: Mr. Mayor, council members. Our traffic study didn't look specifically at all of the pedestrian traffic from McGlynn to Paisley Park specifically just because we would expect that would actually tend to decrease over time. As Ms. Aanenson had noted earlier with the 0 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 changes to the fence recently, the drop in pedestrian traffic has occurred to some extent and so that's something that we'd just continue to monitor. Councilman McDonald: Okay. For right now Mr. Mayor I think that's all the questions I had. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Mr. McDonald. Anybody else have any questions? Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Good evening staff. Thank you for your report and I do have some questions that's for sure. I'm going to start with the very beginning and the Planning Commission. Did the Planning Commission, when there's a big development coming through sometimes they'll get a preview or they'll get a review of what's going to be coming up and they have time to talk to the applicant and work out some kinks. Was that, did that ever happen with any of these conversations ever? Kate Aanenson: Well this is a really unique situation because typically administratively we change building uses all the time. We have large businesses go in and out. For example the Bernard Group who just moved what, 450-500 jobs. The only people that got involved with that was the building inspections so they've been in there for a year now and so they're just talking to us now about potentially expanding the building site plan so sometimes those can be done administratively if they're less than 10 percent. So because this building wasn't being changed administratively then we're looking at the building code issues and the fire marshal, those sort of things. Really the issue on this was to change tripped us up in looking at traffic management just because of the change in use so as a general rule because the building wasn't changing, not as big of building code or site plan review issues, if that makes sense. Councilwoman Tjornhom: It makes sense. I want to go back even further. The Planning Commission does a lot with the Comprehensive Plan and they do a lot with zoning and rezoning is I think even a bigger issue than just changing buildings and sites like the Bernard Group did and so with the Comprehensive Plan did they have time to review that and look at what the impact could be with rezoning it and what that would mean to the areas around it? Kate Aanenson: Yep so we included in there the underlying IOP district. That's a pretty deep industrial district. If you look at some of our larger employers, for example if you looked at Emerson, they have, Emerson Rosemount have over 1,100 employees coming every day. I'm trying to think of some other larger employers. IWCO Direct has about the same number of employees every day so if you had an industrial user in there they could be at that level too so it's consistent with what's around there in the IOP district again we left the underlying zoning district because it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan so in that regard it's not out of character in our mind and that's how we presented it to the Planning Commission. That's how we're presenting it to you. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Can we get an aerial view of yeah. 10 r t Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Kate Aanenson: I think my first slide. Councilwoman Tjomhom: You were so close yep, and I was too slow to say stop. Kate Aanenson: Okay. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Alright so we're going to look at this area and we're going to look at the zoning, what things are zoned and the potential for what the impact could be for the museum coming in and the impact of other parcels. So let's take the parcel east of Paisley Park. What is that zoned and? Kate Aanenson: Office industrial park. Mayor Laufenburger: That's west. Kate Aanenson: Excuse me, east? This is all zoned, whoops excuse me. That's also zoned industrial office park. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay and so now let's go west. And that's office industrial park also? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilwoman Tjomhom: And who owns that property? Kate Aanenson: That's a part of Paisley, but it's a different identity. Entity but yes. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. And so if we go then further is it all office industrial? Kate Aanenson: (Yes). Councilwoman Tjomhom: And who owns that parcel? Kate Aanenson: That is Liv Homeland's group. Liv Homeland's group. I can't remember the name of the development entity. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. And then let's go south of Paisley Park. Tell me about that parcel. Kate Aanenson: This is part of General Mills. I'm not sure this developable. I'm not sure it's all in preserve. 11 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. Aanenson she said south of Paisley Park. Kate Aanenson: Oh I'm sorry. Oh right here? Mayor Laufenburger: Right there. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Either or because I was going to go to all of them. Kate Aanenson: You can talk to Mr. Oehme about that, that's the City public works building. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay, alright. And let's see, yep let's go where you before you were corrected you were south. South of. Mayor Laufenburger: So that would be west of the. Councilwoman Tjomhom: West and south yep. Kate Aanenson: That's not buildable, this part right in here. Councilwoman Tjomhom: That's not buildable okay. Todd Gerhardt: It's the Bluff Creek corridor. It's guided open space. Councilwoman Tjombom: Okay. So let's go back to Paisley Park and can we change that view now so it's where we were before. Was a close up of Paisley Park. Kate Aanenson: Oh sure, sure. Like this one. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yep. I see there's a pond on Paisley Park. Is that considered a wetland or is that a pond? Kate Aanenson: A storm water pond. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. Kate Aanenson: I'll let Paul answer that. Paul Oehme: Yeah I believe that's a storm water pond. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay so are there any wetlands in and around that parameter? Kate Aanenson: What they're doing today isn't impacting any of that so when they come in for their site plan they should meet all the setbacks and be able to accommodate. They will have to 12 r Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 accommodate additional storm water so they'll have to come in with civil plans. Showing us how they're going to accommodate that and provide any additional civil plans. If I can just circle back to all the industrial around, I'm not sure, I'm assuming what you're looking at is when we do our Comprehensive Plan we also do traffic analysis zones and we'll be doing that in the update. We just finished that right now so actually what we do is we look at, based on that zoning and the projected land use we do all the modeling for if there's deficits in road infrastructure. Sewer and water capabilities. All that's based on traffic analysis zone so this isn't out of the realm of the traffic analysis that you know that we looked at even how it was before or into the future because it's looked at as an office industrial zoning district and traffic that would be generated by it in our Comprehensive Plan. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And this did obviously generate a traffic study but what, I guess what I'm trying to wrap my head around is because this didn't go through the Planning Commission or they didn't have a lot of time to really analyze the impact of what's going on. When we do have developments coming in where there's a major traffic impact and also a possible impact to the whole neighborhood and environment around it we will have them do an environment assessment plan or something like that or an AUAR and why aren't we requesting something like that? Why are we settling just for a traffic study? Kate Aanenson: Because they're not really making any changes to the building. They're just making a change to the parking lot. When we do an AUAR you have to have a couple hundred acres of improvement. There's a threshold to that. For example you'd have to have for housing over 600 new houses or for office industrial 200,000 or 300,000 square feet. I don't remember these numbers off the top of my head but somewhere in that park so that change, there isn't that kind of a change here. The scope is pretty minimal. The reason why we wanted the traffic analysis done is because you know when you look at for example Rosemount or IWCO, our larger employers they're coming in all at the same time so this is a frequency and duration throughout the day. It's spread out throughout the day so we just want to manage, instead of having everybody coming in at once and finding their spot, maybe going to lunch, this is traffic throughout the day. We just want to make sure again because we have an access that's non- conforming to the north. We wanted to make sure that we're providing safe ingress and egress. It doesn't meet the threshold for an AUAR or for an environmental study. It didn't meet those thresholds. Councilwoman Tjornhom: When it comes to the traffic, Councilman McDonald started to talk about it when it came to stacking. When you talk about 65 potential guests coming through or being led through every 10 minutes and so that means there's a lot of traffic coming through all the time with buses and so it's not like a typical industrial use where people do show up at 8:00 and they leave at 5:00. This is continual and what is the hours of operation? I thought, is it 9:00 to 9:00? Kate Aanenson: Yes. 13 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Councilwoman Tjornhom: So that's a long day for that road and that neighborhood to be impacted by all that traffic so I am a little concerned that the traffic study really wasn't given enough time or thought or consideration when it came to the impact of the neighborhood so that I guess is a question and a comment... and I don't believe the stacking that it's going to work. When I went through for my look at Paisley Park I drove up at my designated time like I would if I was a ticket holder. I was stopped at the gate and I realize that the road will be moved down but still I was stopped at the gate and it took maybe 2 minutes, maybe more to look through my car and then the gate was opened and I could drive in. Now if that's going to happen to every car that comes in, there's a potential for we don't know how long that stacking is going to sit there because we don't know how long every car is going to take to be checked or every ticket is going to be you know taken and looked at. And then also there's the potential of buses coming in and how does that all flow also. I see the traffic has, the parking lot has been marked but is it marked for buses being parked also? I think we had a good, we had a good look at what it's going to look like to have buses driving up and down Highway 5 with the Ryder Cup this weekend and we saw the impact that had so is there any thought or maybe that's the applicant's. Kate Aanenson: Yep I'll let the applicant address that. Again I want to reiterate that we did put in there that we're studying and there's escrow and security in place to go back if there seems to be any conflict that we would go back and restudy that and see if there's other improvements that would need to be made. That they would have to make to mitigate those. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And now let's talk about parking since I just ended with that and we talk about pedestrian, or people walking to look at Paisley Park as they have been doing and they have been using the Lake Ann parking lot to park there. Is that really something that we do as a city that we allow businesses to use our park parking lots for activities? Kate Aanenson: I'll let the city manager maybe answer that. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And do we ... plan for that to continue or what's the plan with that? Todd Gerhardt: No. As a part of their site plan they had to submit a parking analysis to accommodate their number of patrons that are going to be using the facility including employees and what you're seeing on this slide in front of you is the ultimate buildout for parking to accommodate their patrons and employees. They have one year under our agreement to build out the parking lot as you've seen here. In the interim they're going to have to bus patrons into the site and they have arranged off site parking and have hired a bus service to bring individuals that are going to go on the tours onto buses through Paisley Park. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And I'm sorry maybe I didn't make myself clear. I understand all that but what I'm talking about are those people that don't have a ticket that just want to walk around like they have been doing. They've been using Lake Ann Park. The parking lot now. Is that going to continue? 14 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Todd Gerhardt: It's a public park and we want people to use our trails and they're more than welcome to use Lake Ann parking lots for that. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. Alright I'm going to move on. We're still on the site and we have in the Findings of Fact, and not to be funny because I usually try to lighten things up a little bit but honestly. Mayor Laufenburger: You can do that Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Well I don't think anyone's going to laugh. Honestly with the Findings of Fact I found 3 things that I found factual and that was what it was zoned now, what it was guided and the property description. I'm not going to go for time sake go through all the rest of them why I could content that all these statements are misleading and probably not accurate but for time sake there is one part where we are rezoning it and we talk about uses and limitations and we are allowing a hotel and it's the round building. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilwoman Tjornhom: So we give them a PUD and part of that is that they can only have this as a hotel so are we saying that's chiseled in stone so they couldn't come back in 2 years, 3 years say you know what golly gee this is just amazing and we would love to tear this building down. Improve it and build a 20 story hotel. Can we then say no to them because it's, the language is written like this or are we then back where we are talking about this? Kate Aanenson: I'll let the City Attorney address that. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Knutson. Roger Knutson: Mayor, members of the council. If you adopt this PUD ordinance just like any other provision in your zoning ordinance, can it be changed? Yes. Would that change have to come back to you? Yes. And would you have to review that and determine whether you think it's an appropriate change? Yes. And if you decided it was not and assuming there was a factual basis for that decision based on whatever reasons, traffic, whatever, then you could tum it down. But anyone just to be clear anyone in the city who owns property could come in and make the same request to put up a 20 story hotel on their residential lot if they wanted to. Councilwoman Tjornhom: So really having this in the paperwork saying that we're giving them an allowance to have this right now it's really a moot point because they could come back and try to build whatever they want. Kate Aanenson: No, what we asked them for is to give us a business plan that described the ultimate use of the property because the goal is not to, as the City Attorney stated, to keep back and renegotiating the PUD. It's transparency for everybody. For the residents. For the council. 15 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 For the applicant so they indicated that that might be a desirable use to come back and do a boutique hotel. It was vague in the number of units. That was specified now. It was topped out at 35 but they did have, they'll have to come back and get a building permit. Show bow they're going to park it. All that stuff will have to come back and if they need to get additional permits from anybody else that has jurisdiction on it or look at that traffic, that will also be included in any change in use on that. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. Next question I have, I have 2 more left then I'll turn it over to the rest of the council members. I'm sorry. Mayor Laufenburger: Take your time. Take your time. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I'd like to talk about the letter of credit and $25,000. How did we come to that dollar amount? Kate Aanenson: I'll let the City Engineer, it came through the engineering department. Paul Oehme: So $25,000 is mainly for some of the site improvements necessary for basically from day one. From opening at day one so it would include, the $25,000 would include the access from the north parking lot to the south parking lot. Some of the striping. Some of the other on site modifications. It doesn't include the ultimate buildout of the parking lot or any of those other improvements down the road. It does include some of the striping on site as well so it's just mainly a security to allow us to have the flexibility to make some of those improvements if they weren't forth coming. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And do we have a potential cost of what the future parking could cost? Paul Oehme: We have not calculated that. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Just on that could I, Mr. Oehme could you clarify something. The $25,000 which is an escrow or letter of credit, that doesn't replace the responsibility of the applicant to do it, is that correct? Paul Oehme: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay that's just, that's like leverage that we have please follow through on your plan. If you don't we're going to do it and we're going to use your money, is that correct? Paul Oehme: Exactly. 16 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so it doesn't relieve them of the responsibility to follow through on those things. It just gives us leverage and is that pretty common practice for us to use that letter of credit or escrow? Paul Oehme: Very common with developments. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. I just needed to clarify that for the audience. Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And then I'd like to talk about the tent. Pretty unique situation for the City of Chanhassen to have a tent be in operation as part of a business plan. I know it's temporary but still something I've never seen that we've really allowed except for maybe a sidewalk sale so and it's a 20 percent, that's the number you determined that 20 percent sales would be allowed or product. Tell me how that, where that number came from and how we're going to decide what 20 percent looks like? Kate Aanenson: Sure. So currently that's in the city code. We do have commercial or industrial buildings that manufacture on site that have retail operations that want to sell on site which we do allow. So they can create 25 percent of their floor space can be used for retail sales so it'd be their floor space. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay, 20 percent of their floor space. Kate Aanenson: (Yes). Councilwoman Tjornhom: And that's the tent is 20 percent? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Or. Kate Aanenson: Or probably less than that yes. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay and the operation, the hours of operation for that too is the 9:00 to 9:00? Kate Aanenson: Yes. And you know I guess they'll have to see how that works as they get into the colder months and you know so. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. I have more but I'll wait. Thank you. 17 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Councilwoman Tjornbom. Any other questions? Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you Mr. Mayor. Both of the council members addressed a lot of the questions I had so I appreciate that. One that I still have a question about is in terms of the site improvements as it relates to the traffic study. One of the biggest queuing and stacking problems that was mentioned in the report and touched again on was the relocation of the northern access 220 feet south. Why are, if as the applicant has stated his top 5 busiest anticipated days are taking place within the next 30 days, why are we allowing a year before this site improvement is made when we're anticipating a huge volume of traffic within the first month? Paul Oehme: I think we should have the applicant address some of those issues from those peak periods and to address bow he's going to handle those days from a traffic perspective. Councilwoman Ryan: Is it, and I might just not be familiar with it but is it typical that we allow a delay in site improvements before a business opens? Kate Aanenson: Well I think what we need to understand is the operational part of how they're going to manage this. It's a little unique so I think letting the operator talk about how they're going to internally manage that so their first goal is not to have people bussed but because they don't have all the improvements the mitigation for those improvements is busing people at those peak time but they'll be able to speak to what their ticket sales are right now and again this plan shows ultimate use of the facility at maximum potential so I'll let him talk to where they are as far as maximizing the daily traffic and whether they're or not and how they, again everybody wants it to be successful. For them not to have it be successful, not get people on the property is a problem as it is for us so we always have been both going for the same goal so I'll let them talk about the operation. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay but just as a question for precedent do we typically allow a delay in site improvements before a business is opened? Kate Aanenson: I think what the challenge is when you're at this time of the year sometimes that happens when we've not been able to get full improvements because we've got one coming up right now in another project that moving into a building and may not get all their parking lot in so we're working through some of that right now to get on the watershed district so it happens sometimes. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, City Council. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt. 18 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Todd Gerhardt: To add to that I think the mitigation plan is to do the busing so you limit the number of cars that are stacking intemally so with the buses people will have to be bused out there so you have less cars so less queuing at the exit and coming in. So having less vehicles would limit that stacking so that's the mitigation for the improvements. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay and how about the some of the striping? I know you said some of it has it been done in the parking lot but how about on the road? Kate Aanenson: That's taking place if not today tomorrow. The parking lot has been striped. And the connection between the north and south parking lot has been made also. Councilwoman Ryan: And the pedestrian plan has been submitted? Safety plan. Kate Aanenson: Yep we walked that today. Yeah. Councilwoman Ryan: And will that be something that you cover then tonight? Will the applicant. Kate Aanenson: Well right now they're doing some way finding of how they're exiting the building. There is a pedestrian sidewalk around the building so they'll be doing some way finding. Marking so people coming out know which, how to get to the front of the building and the back of the building. Councilwoman Ryan: But that's nothing we can review tonight? Kate Aanenson: Again that's administrative. You know we've met with them just like building code stuff. We haven't shared with you the building code report either but we did walk the sidewalk and talked about where the markings can be to direct people to get to the north and south sidewalks. Between the buildings. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay it just that as part of the summary here you know as per the Planning Commission they requested us, you know require a pedestrian safety plan put forth by the Planning Commission so. Kate Aanenson: You might be talking about external safety plan, yep and that's one of the things that they talked about and this goes back to some of the fencing. I think that's one of the things that we talked about. Some of the comments they came up with things on the fence causing people to come up to the fence or blowing across the street, that was the safety. I think it was more external than internal. If that was your comment. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And then just to clarify for myself, and I read it somewhere or heard somewhere about, and I know Councilman McDonald addressed the fence and it's up to wt Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 them. There's been talk is it 6 foot? Is it 8 feet? I know code says it's supposed to be 6-6 so what, or that's what's online. Kate Aanenson: Well typically we don't put fences in a front yard. For some reason this was given prior to my time with the City given permission to put up a security fence so it's a legal non -conforming fence. They obviously want a fence for security. We want that to be a secure place too but we also want to make sure that we're not creating an attractive nuisance where there's people congregating in areas and crossing in areas that aren't safe. One of the things we did put in the agreement, back to your point, there is an agreement in here where it talks about, that they would have to accommodate pedestrian crossing potential. Flashing crossing and that is in, I believe that's in the improvement agreement. So if you look in the Site Improvement Agreement, on page 2. E. 2E we added that in there and then if the level of service at any time intersection fails or the study identifies pedestrian safety issues, again the goal is to go back and monitor where we are with these issues. That the applicant would install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk so you'd push a button to cross the street so that was to address the Planning Commission's concerns that were raised. Councilwoman Ryan I think that's what you were asking me. Councilwoman Ryan: Well I was asking about the fence. Just the height of the fence. Kate Aanenson: Yeah so the height of the fence, again it has to be permitted so what we're saying, in an industrial district it can go up to 8 feet. I don't think anybody would want it that high. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Nobody definitely wants an opaque but we also want to make sure it's safe for people driving along Highway 5 and Audubon that are pulling over to look and interfering with the other traffic that's going about their way. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay and then my final question and this may be something that I need to wait for the applicant is the hours of operation. Would that be best to wait for the applicant? Kate Aanenson: Sure. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Thank you Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilwoman Ryan. Anybody else? Councilman Campion, your questions please for staff. Councilman Campion: Thank you Mr. Mayor. My fellow council members were very thorough in their initial questions here but one that occurred to me up front is related to the PUD ordnance 20 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 and the definition of the private events versus the indoor concerts. I didn't see a definition for that and maybe I missed it but I was just curious about you know what is the, is it a? Kate Aanenson: It could be a classroom. It could be a school. Could be a college. It could be a corporate event so something like that. So that would be something instead of doing a larger tour if they wanted to book out something, you know it's all being driven by how much parking's on site so if they can accommodate it and they did, instead of selling tickets for a day or an afternoon and they wanted to do a corporate event or an evening, that could be accommodated. Councilman Campion: So it's not a head count difference or timing? Kate Aanenson: Right so there's only so many people that can be in the building per the building code and so the assembly occupancy so if that's something that they choose to do as a use, then that's and accomplish it by either busing people and parking them on site, then that would be permitted. Councilman Campion: So would that be within the normal hours of operation or the extended hours? Kate Aanenson: There are, we didn't put hours of operation on here. There's tour hour operations but the building, if someone was in there later that's not limited so. Todd Gerhardt: Kate wouldn't they have to come in for a special permit for? Kate Aanenson: The way we're, the way we've addressed it is saying that they would, they would just tell the City you know there's certain rooms that would be able to have occupancy. That they would give us, you know we'd have the occupancy identified and they would tell us that they're having a special event so we would know and as long as they say we're meeting this occupancy load then they would move forward which is, it wouldn't be any different than, if you look at the Dinner Theater. The Dinner Theater has multiple operations in there. So does the Arboretum. Our building folks work well with that. I mean the Dinner Theater has movies. Or plays going on. They have weddings going on. There's a bar. There's all kinds of things in there. Multiple operations going on all the time that's being driven by how much capacity you have for parking. It'd be the same thing here. We certainly know how to manage that so if they wanted a corporate event that went into later hours and they can park everybody there and make it work, then we're okay with that. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Campion let me clarify something here just related to these events. So Ms. Aanenson in the PUD you are stipulating 12 indoor concerts per calendar year. The concert's specific seating plan must be filed with the City. And then you're also stipulating private events and events specific seating plan must be filed. I think what you're saying is that if the operator wants to have 12 indoor concerts or private events they have permission to do so and the only thing they do, they don't have to apply for a permit and go through our permitting 21 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 process. Their responsibility is to provide a seating plan for those events that we are giving them permission to do, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. How is this different from when Prince was alive he would often have concerts, impromptu you know. How did the City deal with those type of events? Kate Aanenson: Those were special permits because at that time it was a different operational as far as you know parking and the like so lots of times those would be bused in. Mayor Laufenburger: He was using off site parking. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: He would tell visitors to go there and we'll bus you in with vans and stuff. Kate Aanenson: Correct. And let us know and often we'd let the sheriff's office know so they could manage that if there was any issues. Mayor Laufenburger: Was there any limit on how many of those we gave him a year? Kate Aanenson: Well typically in a temporary ordinance we you know it'd be about the same but I guess in this circumstance now that we've been through the building we want as another benefit of the PUD we're limiting those to 12 times. Same with the corporate events. We kind of have a handle on how it's being used so. Mayor Laufenburger: When St. Hubert's come to us do they apply for permits if they have big events like their fall harvest and stuff like that? Kate Aanenson: That's correct, yep. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so we would handle those permits on a one at a time basis. Kate Aanenson: Typically those are typically 3 or 4 times a year yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So I think as I understand your question Mr. Campion, essentially the ordinance is saying operator you can do these things and you don't have to give us a permit request as long as you follow the ordinance and just tell us your seating plan so we know that you're going to have, if it's in the big concert, I'm going to call it the big concert room. What's the occupancy load in there Ms. Aanenson, do you know? Kate Aanenson: The big room? 22 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: The big room. Kate Aanenson: I'm not sure, we talked about it today. I don't remember off the top of my head. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so let's assume it's 300 people. Kate Aanenson: Right, yep. Mayor Laufenburger: So as long as they have an occupancy plan for 300 people coming in and they're going to use that big concert venue then it meets the assembly requirements and they don't have to apply for a permit. Kate Aanenson: Right. Mayor Laufenburger: But they do have to tell us how many people are going to be in there. Kate Aanenson: Right and if I may compare it to the auto Motorplex. Because they do get temporary permits. They get one a month at least or more and they don't have all their parking on the site. This one we're saying parking has to be on the site or you're busing them in. Mayor Laufenburger: Accommodated. Kate Aanenson: Accommodated correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. I didn't mean to interrupt Mr. Campion but I think a clarification is that we're essentially pre -permitting events of this nature of this amount. Councilman Campion: And Mr. Mayor, Ms. Aanenson if I could. So I was more looking at you know there's a frequency defined for the, or a maximum number of the indoor concerts define 12 per year and there's essentially unlimited number of private events and I was just wondering from an enforcement perspective you know how you delineate the difference between well this is an indoor concert and this, you know 131i concert they're having, well that's not really a concert. That's a private event and how would you distinguish between the two? Kate Aanenson: Well part of it they're going to have to submit to us you know the plan that they're using so we, I guess if it's over a certain capacity we can do it on that for a minute and try to, and maybe the applicant has a response. Councilman Campion: Okay yeah I was just in reading through it I thought a definition might be helpful. 23 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Anything else Mr. Campion? Councilman Campion: That's it. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: I'm going to give it to Councilwoman Tjornhom. Ladies first Councilwoman Tjomhom: Councilman Campion actually triggered a good thought and that is lighting. Lighting and signage. Do we have a plan for that? When it comes to you know special events. Is the whole building going to be lit up so the neighborhood glows? You know I know when the daycare center came in you know we were very particular about the lights on the building and that because of during the event it could be a distraction to drivers. It is very close to Highway 5 and Audubon, busy roads and because they do have hours of operation into the late evenings, will the parking lots be lit and also will the building be lit up and what about signs? Kate Aanenson: I would assume the parking lot lights would be on as they are on some of the other businesses in town often for security reasons all the time. They haven't talked to us about signage so. Mayor Laufenburger: Would signage be covered under administrative code enforcement? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And what about exterior lighting, would that be covered under administrative code enforcement? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So we don't allow search lights as right now. Those aren't permitted. Mayor Laufenburger: So if somebody wants a search light they've got to come to us and ask? Kate Aanenson: Correct. We do, I think you can get them maybe once a year or something like that for, there's criteria. Grand opening, something like that so. Councilwoman Tjomhom: So like lighting the Paisley Park up the color, I'm sorry. The color of green or you know events like that, I mean have we really gone through and decided what as a community we want to have this light? 24 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Kate Aanenson: Well they're following the city ordinances. City ordinances don't allow that now. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Does not? Kate Aanenson: No. No, that's... Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay ... do that though in our. Kate Aanenson: Well you can ask the City Attorney but everything we have in here is expressly you're following the other city ordinance except what is specified in the code. So they still have to follow all city ordinances. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: If following city ordinances, following city code, city statute, following state statute, whatever it might be, that would be administrative code enforcement, is that correct Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Which is the only area that we thought there might be some reason to give some deference would be on the fencing. Otherwise they're following city code and that would be the only unique attribute because of the site and walk up traffic and people that want to hang things on there. That was the only thing and we're not requesting they, it's just an opportunity. Mayor Laufenburger: And to be specific the deference that you're offering is simply the possibility if the applicant chooses to build a fence in accordance with city code. Kate Aanenson: Right it could be landscaping. It could be a lot of different things, yep. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And I just want to clarify that our city ordinance does state that we're not going to have search lights unless there's a permit for it and it's a special occasion so not once a month we won't have search lights in the sky and that the building cannot be lit up different colors or you know whatever might be decorative lighting as far as they're concerned. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilman McDonald. 25 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Councilman McDonald: Thank you Mr. Mayor. Ijust want to follow up on one thing and no one else has kind of touched it but on the traffic study, and this is for Mr. Oehme. What is the area of the traffic study? Did you look at the impact south on Audubon all the way down to Lyman? Paul Oehme: We did look at traffic volumes along Audubon all the way down to Lyman. Matt do you want to? That's right we did have a slide on that yeah. So you can talk. Matt Pacyna: Yeah so as part of our operations analysis we looked at 3 key intersections but we did identify traffic volumes going further to the south. We didn't look specifically at the intersection of Lyman and Audubon as far as a traffic operation. That was outside the scope of our study but as you can see on this graphic you can kind of see traffic volumes we would expect under that kind of that peak condition of a sold out show through every, basically sold out throughout the day type of situation. We would expect about 600 vehicles to continue south towards Lyman. Now that's before any type of routing type changes that could be made. I know during the Planning Commission we had talked a little bit about you know you can work with Google to actually define your specific routes. If you type in an address that you actually define them to actually use Highway 5 and so that's something I think the applicant was considering. And so that's basically what we looked at from Audubon's perspective. Councilman McDonald: Okay so I guess what I'm trying to get at is what's the impact because that's all residential neighborhood down there below Lake Drive and I guess what my question is, what kind of impact would we have down there? I heard the thing about Google and those things and I guess there's things you can do there. I'm willing to kind of set that aside as that being a shortcut for right now but up north as people are coming in, what I'm wondering is what's the impact to the residents? Are they going to see anything and was that within the scope of your study? Matt Pacyna: Mayor, council members. From a traffic study perspective we look at it from a numbers game. We don't define necessarily impacts to neighborhoods. Different things of that nature. We look at it from a volume perspective and what 400 or 600 vehicles per day means to that facility. If I look at the increase in traffic volumes on Audubon which is a 2 lane roadway with some select turn lanes, the projected ADT's is around 5,000 cars a day. Now that type of facility can easily handle 10,000 cars a day from a roadway capacity perspective, neighborhood impacts aside but the roadway has sufficient capacity to accommodate an increase in volume of that nature. Councilman McDonald: Okay and again that 5,000 cars you talk about, that's all north of Lake Drive West I believe. You're not really seeing a lot of spillage coming down below that point then? It would be local traffic if I understand what you're saying is, that's the 600 cars you talked about should be a majority local traffic. W Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Matt Pacyna: Correct. In theory there would be local residents that would also utilize, you know that's just their most convenient route for them to get from their residence to the museum. There is going to be some of that. Councilman McDonald: Okay. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. I also have some questions that I want to ask. Matt while you're on that or Mr. Pacyna, this Google thing is rather intriguing to me. Do you have enough expertise about how Google does their routing that you can speak to how we could change their routing? Matt Pacyna: As far as expertise I've never actually done it. I know some of our staff have. It is a simple request that can be made to Google that says I would like traffic from my address routed a certain direction. Mayor Laufenburger: What about, you mean to my address? If we said 7801 Audubon Road we could say send them this way? Matt Pacyna: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Matt Pacyna: And so from that regard so if you would say if somebody was coming in off of... Mayor Laufenburger: Say if they were coming from the Mall of America. Matt Pacyna: Well Mall of America is one that they'll direct you just because Highway 5, it's going to send you down Highway 5 because that's the direct route. Now let's say if you were somewhere a little bit more southeast of there that would more likely you'd want to take Highway 212 per se, that would be an opportunity where you could make that change with Google to have them direct them up to Highway 5 and over. Taking like 101 per se. Mayor Laufenburger: So when you say southeast of Bloomington? Matt Pacyna: Well I'm just saying somewhere south of like, if you were like in southern. Mayor Laufenburger: Burnsville? Matt Pacyna: Eden Prairie. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh Eden Prairie. Matt Pacyna: Correct. 27 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: So if you had closer proximity to 212 versus Highway 5 then it would likely send you to 212. Matt Pacyna: Correct, correct. Yeah we do some Google searches as part of our traffic operations analysis and you do kind of look at some of those Burnsville areas and you type in the address you know what we were seeing is that it would be directing those vehicles onto Highway 5. So it sent some of those. Mayor Laufenburger: You did that in your research? Matt Pacyna: Correct. That's part of our process when we start to develop our directional distribution for our traffic. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Who would have the responsibility to reach out to those traffic influencers or those direction influences? Would that be your responsibility? The City? Or would that be the operator or the property owner? What's your experience with that Mr. Pacyna? Matt Pacyna: My understanding is that would typically be the property owner in that situation. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright. By the way I Goggled Bloomington to 7801 and it took me down Highway 5. I also Googled Burnsville and it took me down Highway 5. Mr. Gerhardt did you have a comment? Todd Gerhardt: I would like to ask Matt if he could explain, council has reviewed traffic studies in the past and increases in those and a previous traffic engineer used A, B, C, D and so with the additional traffic coming off of Lyman onto Audubon, the 600 cars during a 12 hour period or 50 cars per hour on the average, what would that do to Audubon? What's Audubon rated today? Is it rated an A, a B and then with those additional 600 you know what would the rating be after that do you think? Matt Pacyna: Mayor, council members. From a level of service perspective we didn't look specifically at the Audubon and Lyman intersection so I can't definitively said one way or the other. However I would, based on my engineering judgment I'd say the increase is relatively minimal and I would expect it to significant change the level of service at that location. Or along Audubon in general. Todd Gerhardt: At the Highway 5 and Audubon intersection would you say that too? Matt Pacyna: So from our operations analysis we did look at that Highway 5 and Audubon intersection specifically. Without any improvements at that location the level of service did degrade to a level of service D which is a letter grade worst. However when working with some 28 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 of the, with MnDOT and the signal retiming and the optimization that can occur there as well as the access changes and the restriping along Audubon that improvement actually gets back to a level of service C which is, you know a level of service D is technically still considered an acceptable level of service by industry standards but C is actually a very good letter grade. Todd Gerhardt: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay thank you Mr. Pacyna. Kate can you speak to this question? When did we receive the application for this project? I thought you had it at the top of your head. Kate Aanenson: Sorry. Todd Gerhardt: August 22nd Kate Aanenson: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And what are the statutory requirements that we have to respond to or act on an application like this? Kate Aanenson: 120 days. Mayor Laufenburger: So we have to respond within 120 days. Roger Knutson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Let's talk about this tent for just a second. In the plan it talks about it will be kind of like a finishing point for the tour. Things can be sold and food might be consumed in there, memorabilia and things like that. Do you have any indication of what happens to the people after they leave the tent? Do they go back, what happens? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Yep they can exit. There's a sidewalk that can take them around to their vehicles or the bus. Mayor Laufenburger: And is that permitted on this, it's okay for them to do that...? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Okay, is there any discussion about what happens to the barriers on Audubon? These would be known as the Jersey barriers. Mr. Oehme? I know I don't think it was in there but they're there. Paul Oehme: Yeah they're there for the safety perspective of pedestrians that are walking up right now so we had talked about that specifically today. In order to get the striping in we will 0119 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 need to move the Jersey barriers back to the back of the curb at this time but in the future we're anticipating maybe in a month or two we'd like to remove them altogether. Mayor Laufenburger: So you're going to move the Jersey barriers so right now, right now there's, let's just call it a 3 foot path between the barriers and the curb so you're going to move them to the curb, is that correct? Paul Oehme: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: So in other words you're saying if you want to walk in front of the fence, if you want to be a pedestrian you've got to be on the property as opposed to on the street. Paul Oehme: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And you said that's to allow for full striping, is that what you're saying? Paul Oehme: Right so in order to put that left tum lane in there, the middle of Audubon we need the additional width for the northbound through traffic because we are pushing the, that northbound lane farther to the east. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Tum lanes map? PaulOehme: No. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there anything, you know clearly those have been in place since about April 25'b if I'm not mistaken right? Since 4 days after Prince passed away. Paul Oehme: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Have they been served, have they been used properly do you think based on your observations based on the reports that you hear? Paul Oehme: Yeah I think they were well placed and they did their work. Mayor Laufenburger: Has there been any discussion with the applicant about the possibility of replacing those barriers with something else on the property to keep pedestrians off the street? Has there been any discussion about that Mr. Oehme? Paul Oehme: We have not directly talked to the applicant about that specifically. Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. Aanenson have you had anything, conversation with that? 30 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Kate Aanenson: Well I think we've talked about long term how they want to manage that and so that's something that as we talk about level of service going forward as they see how the operations work that they would work that into future plans. Mayor Laufenburger: Sure, okay. I just have one last question and then we're going to bring the applicant up. Kate you said the underlying zoning is IOP. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And that stands for? Kate Aanenson: Industrial Office Park. Mayor Laufenburger: Right, okay. And what about the zoning for industrial office park does not satisfy the need for a museum? Is it only the museum? Kate Aanenson: Correct. I think that would be right. The other things could probably go in the industrial office park. Mayor Laufenburger: For example the opportunity to sell things. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: The retail. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: That's allowed in the IOP right? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: So is there a zoning that we have in the city that allows a museum? Kate Aanenson: A office district but it's inconsistent with the underlying guiding. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so the concession, using a term that was asked earlier. The concession that we're giving them really is adding a museum use to the IOP and calling it a planned unit development. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Is that in it's simplest form? 31 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Kate Aanenson: Yes except that we also are limiting other uses that could go on there that might not be as desirable. Mayor Laufenburger: Ah, okay. So we're saying we're giving you this museum capability but we're going to take away some other capabilities? Kate Aanenson: Yes we've contracted the other uses, correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Okay. And then you also identify in the executive summary you talk about 5 things. Limitations on how the building, preserves existing limited expansion, creates additional jobs, tourism generated, et cetera. There's one thing that's not addressed and maybe this is something you cannot address and that is, is there any discussion related to turning Paisley Park into a historic site? Have you had any discussion or any responsibility in that? Kate Aanenson: No. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright I'll ask the applicant that. Okay, alright before I ask the applicant any other questions of council? Okay. Alright is the applicant present tonight? And if so would you like to address the council? State your name and address for the record please. Pat Mazural: Mr. Mayor, council members. My name is Pat Mazural. My address is 9501 Virginia Avenue South in Bloomington and I'm a consultant with Bremer Trust who are the applicant and the special administrator for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay is that the same as PRN, what's the PRN Music? Because that's the name that's referenced on many of our materials. Pat Mazural: Mr. Mayor, PRN does stand for Prince Rogers Nelson. Mayor Laufenburger: Good. Pat Mazural: And it's one of the organizations that is represented. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, okay. Pat Mazural: So thank you Mayor and council members for allowing us this time for this hearing and certainly want to thank the staff of Chanhassen for a good amount of diligent work and site work at Paisley Park and helping us to make this the best project that it can be. My comments are really going to focus on a number of the soft issues. The reason why this use of Paisley Park is proposed, the selection of the operator by Bremer Trust. How some community and staff concerns that have been raised, how they are being addressed and the perceived 32 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 community impact by this project. Mr. Nelson was an extraordinary talent. He was a unique musical artist. He sold over 100 million records. Received 7 Grammy awards, one Golden Globe, one Academy Award and tragically on April 21' he passed away here in Chanhassen and in fact at Paisley Park which is where he created and recorded. He often performed as you've referenced and he welcomed renowned entertainment giants from all over the world. The purpose of a museum at Paisley Park is to preserve the legacy of an international celebrity who chose Chanhassen as his home and the people of Chanhassen as his neighbors. Paisley Park itself is a unique facility within the music industry because it represents all the work of one of the most recognized international artistic celebrities of our time. A museum at Paisley Park is the only appropriate location to commemorate the work and the life of Prince. Chanhassen is where he built his legacy. Chanhassen is surely where he would want it preserved. Preserving that legacy means honoring not only his extraordinary work but also representing the neighbor that he was within Chanhassen. To meet that goal requires the most experienced, creative, artistically sensitive and community sensitive of operators for this museum and the property closest in purpose and in operational logistics to Paisley Park is Graceland in Memphis which of course commemorates Elvis Presley and which is operated by Graceland Holdings. The operator of a Paisley Park museum will be PPark Management which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Graceland Holdings. So this Paisley Park museum will be, if you should approve this rezoning, a fully managed with the same experienced leadership that has been managing the Graceland property. The due diligence of Bremer Trust of the operations of Graceland included both an on site tour as it would be experienced by a visitor and behind the scenes open book type of investigation into their operations. On the tour we saw a high level of traffic coordination. Use of shuttles. Smooth and comfortable crowd flow. We saw guests who were welcomed cordially and technology that made the tour experience pleasant, educational and emotionally moving. All of these are matters that we anticipate would be of greatest important to the family of Prince and to the pride of Chanhassen. Our behind the scenes investigation revealed a high level of thoughtfulness, expertise and discipline in the coordination of operations. In the financial and operational record keeping and oversight. Archiving of artifacts. Present and preserving the artist's brand and attention to impact on the surround community. We saw an attraction that is a natural emotional demonstration of the artist life and that same artistic sensitivity and community sensitivity will be demonstrated and replicated at Paisley Park. Your community development staff has worked diligently to identify issues and to gather comments from your residents to direct us in making the Paisley Park museum an attractive, safe and appreciated asset of Chanhassen. Graceland has dealt well with all of the same issues so it's long experienced in forms and guides it's solutions. Matters that have been accomplished since the Planning Commission hearing include first the matter of traffic flow in and out of Paisley Park. The connecting driveway between the north and south lots which has been referenced and was part of the recommended plan is in place and that of course is part of the internal traffic flow which will assist in keeping long queue lines from outside of the property. The striping of Audubon Avenue for left hand turns is in process. That currently is scheduled to be done on Wednesday and some of the work in removing current lines will begin in fact tomorrow. The striping of the parking lot within Paisley Park in order to control vehicle limits has already been done as well. The second matter that has been raised is pedestrian traffic around Paisley Park. Fence monitoring for 33 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 pedestrian safety began shortly after the Planning Commission hearing and that has produced perhaps an unexpectedly pleasant result. The amount of foot traffic, the amount of pedestrian traffic around Paisley Park has significantly reduced over the last several days as memorials to Prince have been removed from the fence. At the same time those memorials are being honored and preserved and in fact will be part of the museum tour. The third matter is security and crowd control. PPark Management is pre -selling all tickets for the Paisley Park tour so there will not be on site sales. There will not be traffic of people coming expecting to get a ticket and being able to take the tour. All will be pre -sold which allows the operator to regulate inflow and out flow of guests and of traffic and in fact also allows the operator to send messages if need be in terms of changing to a shuttle type of travel if needed on a particular day or at a particular time. So all of that will be, the timing will be regulated and it will be fully regulated access to Paisley Park. In addition there has been coordination with local and county law enforcement and a security chief has already been hired for the Paisley Park facility who will oversee all security and crowd control. Chanhassen is a, as you all know a beautiful well planned community and it holds attraction for many outside of the city currently. The city attracts those seeking entertainment with the Chanhassen Dinner Theater. It attracts those seeking sports entertainment with the adjacent Hazeltine Golf Course which as you know has hosted the Ryder Cup, the PGA tournament and the US Open. It attracts those seeking enjoyment of nature and art with the Arboretum. All has been planned well and brings people from far beyond the Twin Cities metropolitan area to your community. The museum at Paisley Park proposes to be another well planned and well managed attraction. A good neighbor providing jobs for residents and bringing customers for your businesses. Over 600 local applicants attended a job fair that Paisley Park Management hosted. Many of those are now employed and archiving and otherwise preparing the facility to be a museum. Last week Paisley Park Management hired a general manager for the museum. A permanent general manager. She is a resident of Chanhassen. She was raised in Chanhassen. She's worked and lived in other parts of the world but has chosen Chanhassen as her city for raising her family and now she has just been pleased to be able to secure this particular position for Paisley Park. The operator of Paisley Park has engaged local suppliers for property improvement and will engage others for food, for transportation and for other necessary services to run the museum. There have been requests to locate this museum and actually to physically move the Paisley Park facility to other locations even outside of the United States where Prince remains a celebrity. Chanhassen been Prince's chosen home for 30 years and this commemoration of his legacy we request that you let it remain his home so thank you for you time and consideration. I have with me other individuals who have been a significant part of developing this proposal and interacting with your staff. Todd Phelps here is an attorney with Stinson Leonard Street in Minneapolis. He is a real estate and land use attorney and has worked directly with your staff on this application. Deb Fossen is the lead officer for Bremer Trust and the administration of the Prince Rogers Nelson estate. And Joel Weinshanker is the majority owner of Graceland Holdings LLC which wholly owns Paisley Park Management LLC and Joel has been here nearly daily since the time that we began this effort in order to oversee the operations and assure it's quality. 34 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: 'Thank you Mr. Mazural. Would you mind just standing for questions if they arise? Pat Mazural: Certainly. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, council members. Any questions for Mr. Mazural? Councilman McDonald: I'll go fust. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, Councilman McDonald. And this is questions for he or for other members that may be present. Councilman McDonald: Right. Thank you for coming. Very good presentation. You know it gives us a good idea of what the overview is and everything. I'll be upfront, I mean I have a lot of concerns about this area. A lot of it deals with traffic which is I think outside of your control so we won't get into that but I do have a lot of questions about pedestrian safety. I hear what you're saying about the fence. About taking down the memorials that you know there's fewer foot traffic but would you agree that the foot traffic is not going to go away. That it will always be there and it may peak at certain times throughout the year. Pat Mazural: I think we can anticipate that Councilmember McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Okay. And let me just ask you a little bit about the fence. Because of what's happened recently with taking down the memorials do you all still feel the need to put up a different fence? An opaque fence or are you satisfied that the current fence would provide you the security you're looking for? Pat Mazural: That is no longer the go to plan. Actually the original thought on putting up an opaque fence was to handle the safety issue so that it wouldn't be an attraction for people coming to see Paisley Park. I think with some of the actual citizen comments that were made at the Planning Commission it became apparent that actually some of the citizens would just as soon have that view available and other avenues were approached between the operator and city staff and in fact what's going on right now with the removal of the memorials is sort of a test so you know the preference would be not to change it if it's not necessary for pedestrian safety. Councilman McDonald: Well I do appreciate you listening to those comments but yeah, it wasn't just the citizens of Chanhassen. I've gotten a lot of emails and I'm sure you have also from people around the world that would like to just see the site in their own way to memorialize Prince and I think that that would be an important part. But then that leads to the question of their safety. What are your plans as far as having pedestrian access around the perimeter of the site? Would you put in safety barriers? Sidewalks? Do you have any plans to handle pedestrians as they walk around? 35 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Pat Mazural: Council member McDonald I think I will ask Joel Weinshanker to come up to the microphone to answer that. Mayor Laufenburger: Just identify yourself and your address if you wouldn't mind. Joel Weinshanker: Sure, Joel Weinshanker. I'm managing partner of both PPark Management and Graceland Holdings, New York, New York. You know we issued a press release on Monday and then very, very carefully our archivist actually took off each item that was on the fence and we've kept it and we've actually photographed each item. Since then traffic has been down conservatively 90 percent or 95 percent. Almost to that there is no traffic. We still have third parry security guards at the gate and it's really just you know, we've asked the Prince fans to please not congregate because that's, we want to keep the fence. We're trying to keep everything the way that Prince had it. Anything that, any changes that we're making are for either public safety or just a requirement for what we're doing so it's our, you know it's our desire, our deep desire to keep the fence the way it is so we feel that any pedestrian, anything that would promote pedestrians from coming by since they really haven't in the last week would actually be counter intuitive and counter productive. Councilman McDonald: Well I hear you but also this is a cyclical in nature. I mean depending upon the day of the month, the month there could be people that decide to come out there. You're getting ready to hold a concert later this month. As a result of that there could be people that say you know let's go see it one last time and decide to drive out. My concern comes down that a lot of those people park on either McGlynn Road and have to cross Audubon or they're going to park down in the city park and walk under Highway 5 which I think is a safer way to do it but the people walking up and down Audubon what's the safety plan for them because at this point that is right next to the road and one of the things that we're trying to do is normalize our get back to normal as much as possible traffic flow on that road. What do you intend to do there as far as pedestrian safety? Joel Weinshanker: So we are working with the City and there are some things that we have talked to the City about in terms of the signals and if we would have to put a crosswalk or anything of that nature but we really feel at the end of the day the best result, and we feel it's practical at this point. We were actually I think everyone has been very pleasantly surprised by Prince fans really heeding the warning and I understand you know you're talking about the, it being cyclical but once October 6' comes along you know if you're a local resident you've had many, many opportunities to come by and take a look. If you're coming from hundreds and hundreds of miles away, or thousands of miles away which people are, we have very affordable tickets so someone coming from Chicago and traveling 6 or 7 hours to get here, going to the concert, doing other things, those are the people that are coming in they don't need to walk around and we've just really, so we're going to continue working with the City. We're going to look at the study, not only from a year standpoint. From a day. From a week. From a month and any time we get an indication that there's a problem we're going to work with the City like we have. We, after the planning meeting and throughout the planning meeting we've actually 01 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 made a lot of pivots based upon the suggestions of the residents where there were some really good suggestions from the residents. There really were from a couple of the planning members as well. From the conversations that we've had with the mayor and with some of the council people, it's a work in progress and what we've done, just so everyone understands because everyone's talking about these huge numbers of traffic. Because of the conversations that we've had we've really throttled the daily number of people that we're allowing in so we're not looking at 600 people per hour. We've actually throttled it to less than 200 people an hour so we're looking at in the highest days which you can count on one hand right now, less than 40 cars per hour and less than 6 buses per hour. So the bigger numbers are what is conceptually possible based upon how many people can walk through at one time. Not the true amount of tickets that we're selling because until it happens we want to make sure that we're just as good of neighbors as Prince was so we've actually throttled back severely the amount of availability. Councilman McDonald: Well I understand that and that all deals with the internal operations and the impact that may have on traffic but I just, I'm not feeling I'm getting the answer I want about pedestrian safety. I mean that was something that was brought up at the Planning Commission and looking at this and having been out there I know that there will be people that will just want to walk around it and I know that they will drive down Audubon. They'll probably park on McGlynn Road because it looks like that's what it's there for and then they're going to try to cross the road and I agree with the one resident that said as she was taking pictures and watching people, they don't pay attention. You know it's as far as they're concerned it's a parkway and they're going to walk right across. What are we going to do about those pedestrians? Even if it's only one or two, what are we going to do about pedestrian safety? That's a question that I feel is lacking in all of this and it's especially along Audubon Road. You've got the sidewalk on the side facing 5 so I think everything's fine there. I just haven't seen anything as to how we're going to handle people crossing Audubon from McGlynn or from any place down through there. That's what I'm asking for. Joel Weinshanker: So to the same extent we're talking about the moving of the northern entrance, we engaged the same consultants who did the traffic to do the study as it relates to us adding blacktop and us adding sidewalk and that's how we were able to add on the one lane road that we've already added. We're waiting for the consultant to come back to us next week to tell us, to give us our plan of action to be able to add the additional which would include the ability to add a sidewalk because once you go over a certain number of square feet the watershed district comes into play so we're waiting to get our answer back from that and once we're able to add the square footage we will. Councilman McDonald: Okay so it is in your plan because we talked about moving the Jersey barriers and I think that's what you're talking about. Moving those to the side at this point. Is that correct Mr. Oehme? Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council members. I think what Councilmember McDonald is talking about is a pedestrian access between McGlynn Drive and Highway 5 just to the south of your 37 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 most southerly access point and staff is indifferent about introducing a pedestrian crossing mid - street. You know Paul I think would tell you that he would encourage people to go down to the controlled intersection and use the crossing at Highway 5 and Audubon to cross over and when you do it mid -street you don't have a controlled intersection. The pedestrian is at the whim of the car. Even we kind of see this at Instant Web Companies. We have pedestrian flashing there but it is a constant battle between car and pedestrian at that intersection so staff is indifferent in, to suggest having a crossing mid -street. Wouldn't you say Paul? Paul Oehme: Yes. And to your point Mr. Gerhardt a lot of those crossings there's warrants that have to be, thresholds to actually put those in as well so we just don't want to put them in willy nilly so we want you know, what the plan would be is to monitor exactly how much traffic or pedestrian traffic initially would be going back and forth between McGlynn Road. As Joel indicated that's not the preference. We don't want to have walk up pedestrian traffic along Paisley Park especially on Audubon Road. That area between the back of the curb and the fence is not, it's kind of steep. It's, there's no sidewalk out there. It's really not pedestrian conducive for pedestrians to be out there so we want to discourage that type of pedestrian movement as much as we can. That's why we want to work with the applicant and see what we can do to try to mitigate and discourage a lot of that traffic as much as we can. Kate Aanenson: And can I just add one more thing. That is what we have in the performance agreement. That we're going to monitor the level of service, that's what part of the escrow is to manage that. That specific issue. Councilman McDonald: Okay well it's perfectly acceptable to tell me that we're going to discourage pedestrian traffic. That's what I'm trying to get at is what's your plan? It's either we will accommodate it and this is how we're going to do it safely or we will say that it's not allowed and this is how we're going to do it. People that come to this do not understand about your plan with McGlynn Road or those things. I look for positive reinforcements to tell people this is not a parking lot so you can walk across the street and view you know Paisley Park. If we're going to set this up for a museum all I'm asking for is how do we make sure that pedestrians are safe and part of that could be you can't walk across the road and you can't walk north/south up and down the fence. That's a perfectly acceptable answer. I just need to hear it from somebody that that's what your plan is because otherwise you've left something open that is ambiguous and every time you do that you know that someone is going to be crossing the road and they're going to expect well that's what they want me to do. So that's all I'm looking for is how do we control that. Mayor Laufenburger: Before you answer that Mr. McDonald if I may. Mr. Gerhardt and Mr. Oehme and even Ms. Aanenson, what have we done to control pedestrian safety since April 30`h? Todd Gerhardt: Install J barrier along the westerly property line curb of Audubon. From Highway 5 up to their most southerly access. Ir Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Have we discouraged people from parking at Lake Ann? Todd Gerhardt: No. Mayor Laufenburger: Have we said anything about if you're going to visit, if you're going to walk to Paisley Park don't park at Lake Ann? Todd Gerhardt: No. Mayor Laufenburger: So do we know that there are people still parking at Lake Ann? Todd Gerhardt: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: And is there anything to prevent them from parking at Lake Ann? Can we prevent them from parking at Lake Ann? Todd Gerhardt: No. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So, Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor Lake Ann's not the problem. Mayor Laufenburger: I understand, understand. How about McGlynn Drive, is there anything that, is there anything we can do to prevent people from parking on a public road? McGlynn Drive. Todd Gerhardt: The City Council could designate it as no parking but it would have to take council action. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Is that, that's not part of your recommendation is it? Todd Gerhardt: No. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, ahight. Councilman McDonald: Okay I guess with that I will yield. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you Mr. McDonald. Any other questions of the applicant? Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I would like to address the stacking. I was addressing staff with that earlier and staff asked me to address the applicant. When I came to visit Paisley Park I took Highway 5. Got on Audubon and went to the entrance. Parked and someone else was behind me 39 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 coming to the same event and they couldn't, they had to sit and wait for me to get processed. Now even by moving the entrance south I'm still not convinced that there isn't going to be a huge stacking issue so if you could just, let's say I'm here to see Prince and Paisley Park. I've got my ticket and I'm up at the gate. Walk me through that's going to happen. Joel Weinshanker: Sure and I've had the same frustration that you have actually because I've been treated up to now the same way when I'm coming in. So as people come in the southern entrance, no one is going to, there's no cars going to be checked. Not even ticketing is checked. Every car that comes in will be let in and then have them make an immediate left to go down the newly formed road. There's going to be one parking attendant for every 4 cars so the people are going to be able to go down the road. So we have 270 feet between the, when people come in from the south to when people would get into the north parking lot so we have room for about a dozen cars based upon his 23-24 foot average estimate. So no cars are going to be, no cars are checked you know basically at all but they're not, but they're not going to be. But even with the ticketing standpoint they come all the way in before they're even checked for tickets. Todd Gerhardt: Joel can you point on that drawing where the first check point is? Joel Weinshanker: So a person comes in, the people are going to come in here. There's now a road here that obviously isn't, well actually the road is here so it's a one lane road this way. People will come in and then they start to be checked in this area. So people with cars will come in unchecked. Go through here and then they'll start to be checked in this area. Obviously this doesn't exist yet. Any cars that are, the cars that are proper will then be able to make a right hand tum. The cars that are not... Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. Now they're being checked. Mayor Laufenburger: Just a moment. I appreciate that members of the audience have questions about this but it's important that you remain quiet so that we can have this dialogue between the council and the applicant. Thank you. Councilwoman Tjomhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Mr. Mayor. The cars are, that are coming in that are stacked that are being checked, looks like they'll be parked along parking spaces so is there going to be ample, are these parking spaces right? Joel Weinshanker: They don't exist yet. Councilwoman Tjomhom: But will they be? Joel Weinshanker: No. Not for opening. Kate Aanenson: Yeah that's long term. Eno Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Joel Weinshanker: That would be for spring. That would be part of what we're obligated to do in second phase so right now the only thing that exists is that a one lane road in that section. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. Joel Weinshanker: So they'll be just basically ready to go one way or the other. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And will the cars be checked as they're leaving? Joel Weinshanker: No. Councilwoman Tjornhom: So they'll just get in their car and go and that's it? Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: As about inspection. You said that your car was inspected is that correct? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yeah he said there wasn't going to. Mayor Laufenburger: No inspection. So the only thing that you're checking is timing and do you have a ticket. Joel Weinshanker: Correct. The only time, the person will be checked upon entering, before they enter Paisley Park. Right when you walk in if you remember where your bags were checked. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yeah but not in your car. Joel Weinshanker: But not in the car. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And then I just on a happier note I've never been to Graceland but I've been doing some reading about it and it looks like you did put up a very lovely hotel right close to Graceland or on the property. Joel Weinshanker: Yes. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And then it looks like you also got approval from the City to put up an entertainment complex. Joel Weinshanker: We did. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Is that right? Joel Weinshanker: Neither of which is on the property. So you know the property as we see here, as long as it's my say we, you know I would never ever touch a building on this property. 41 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 would never add a building on this property. I would never take away a building on this property. This is the way that Prince built it and this is the way that you know the Mayor asked about historical. Regardless of if and when the state and the country do rightfully issue a historical preservation, we're treating like that from day one. So we don't even change, you know if you came in and you remember the carpet. The carpet was the original carpet but if we had just left it there it would have been decimated so what we did is we had a company reproduce the carpet and we put that carpet on top of the original carpet because it was installed in a commercial way and that was just glued so it would have been destroyed if we tried to pull it up so even the carpeting we're not moving. We had to put something on top of it to preserve it but we're not planning on doing anything. What was done at Graceland, and this is not Graceland. I mean very frankly you know I'm the managing partner of Graceland. I'm the managing partner of PPark Management. I'm a Prince fan and this is the way Prince wanted it and this is the way it's going to be kept. The hotel at Graceland is not on the mansion property. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Right. Joel Weinshanker: It's on a piece of property that was bought 20 years later a mile down. And if we have, and if this is as successful as we hope it to be and several years from now the City were to agree with us that we would want to see more of Prince, there are other properties in town. There are properties in Eden Prairie. There are properties you know, there are many places it could be but to add to this property just wouldn't even feel right. It would feel squished. It would feel like there's too much. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yep no but I mean there, we did in the beginning of my questions to staff we did go through Highway 5. Down Highway 5 and the potential open spaces for such entities. Joel Weinshanker: And that would be something that the City would have to want. You know we'd want the City to come to us and say, we have such a wonderful experience what more can we do for Prince so that would be the type of conversation we would want to have with the City. We can't buy a property and put anything on it without the great council and the mayor approving it. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Well and I think the City of Memphis assisted you also with some TIF and bonding. Joel Weinshanker: They basically, so as we're uplifting the community they're giving us part of the uplift back so basically they're just, we're filling their coffers and they're giving us a little bit of how we're feeling it back. Councilwoman Tjornhom: No and I think it looks like a wonderful thing but I think that's all I have for you right now. EJ)O Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: 'Thank you Councilwoman Tjomhom. Anybody, any other questions for the applicant? Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Could you address the hours of operation? You know it's of concern of me on the 9:00 to 9:00 timeframe. Joel Weinshanker: And again we've heard the town so what we've done is some nights we're open 9:00 to 9:00. Mostly weekends but we've actually dialed back and actually refunded a few tickets going in so we've only put on sale less than 3 months actually so right now the only thing that's on sale is October 6'° to December 31'. What we wanted to do is we wanted to see what the reaction was. We wanted to see what people wanted and then after hearing the City, both from the Planning Commission before and after, we've actually dialed back many of the weekdays to 7:00 p.m. Councilwoman Ryan: So the latest your dialing it back to is 7:00. Joel Weinshanker: So that would be yes, so right now and I actually believe there are a few days even earlier. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Joel Weinshanker: So we're actually, what we're trying to do is find that perfect mix of what is appropriate for the City and what is appropriate for the fan. Councilwoman Ryan: And did I read correctly somewhere that on some occasions it would be open til midnight or was that? Mayor Laufenburger: How about events? Joel Weinshanker: So again a private event, you know because I think there was a question of what a private event would look like. To me a private event would be, and it's really you know and we've had many conversations already with many local companies because we've had questions so Lifetime Fitness. If they wanted to have a corporate event what we would do is we would sell them 200 tickets an hour for their people to come in and then at the end of that but during the hours they would then come in and we would get, you know we would get the approval to have banquet space for 400 or 500 people in the sound stage and they would end with a ceremony for I guess the best salesman of the year award or something similar. That's how we view private events but very frankly I really don't anticipate being open til midnight unless it's very, you know it would be a very, very, very irregular occurrence and to answer a 43 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 question that you had before that wasn't answered, we're not promoting people coming without a ticket. If you don't have a ticket please do not come is what we're telling people. It's the messaging that we're giving everything so the concept of having a spotlight or any kind of bright lights to attract people is not what we're looking to do. We're giving people ample opportunity to come but come at a respectable time in a way that we can control. So we're not looking for people off, you know to come off, and we're really looking to operate within a specific time set. There may be an occurrence. There may be if it's an anniversary of something that that's important but it would really be you know from a practical standpoint the exception rather than the rule. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay because in the packet it said that Monday through Thursday was going to be 9:00 to 9:00 and then the other days was going to be 9:00 to midnight. I mean it did state that. Pat Mazural: Yeah and Councilwoman Ryan I think that was the initial packet and the initial business plan which we wanted to make sure it was as expansive as might be the case and certainly was before any tickets went on sale and before as Mr. Weinshanker is saying we were able to determine you know what is the need so that's an old number that was intended to be more expansive than what might be needed. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay and then just in terms of I know you say that you're going to manage it in terms of how the City feels but your ultimate goal is obviously to pay tribute to Prince, I understand that but to run a successful business and museum so after the first 3 months, I mean what are, how are you evaluating the expansion of hours? The increase of ticket sales so then. Joel Weinshanker: So we really don't even, you know so Graceland is the number one destination attraction in America and it's only open 10 or 11 hours a day. We really, the capacity that we would have to hit on a regular basis to have to expand hours is unrealistic for anyone so you would be, whatever the number, you know it just, you know we feel that within these hours we're going to be able to service every single Prince guest every time they want to come so there really doesn't need, you know what we're looking at from a throttle standpoint is, you know the traffic study said with, when we brought in the road, which we have. When we're coming in the south instead of the north we came up with a per hour number. We're 40 or 50 percent below that. When we get above 40 an hour we're bringing in buses. So although I think we were at 72 in the last part of the study, we're not coming close to that. We're not coming, what we want to do in the first 3 months is be as far away from the line as possible and see what happens. If everything is wonderful in those first 3 months, we'll go from 40 to 50 to 60, still well below what the study with what we're doing allows but that's the throttling we're going to do. You know there's just, you know frankly everyone's experience is that there's no reason to really need to be open more to be able to service. You know this building was designed for people to tour. Prince had a strong desire. He set this building up as the council people who actually and the mayor who actually walked through the building knew, you know all we're doing is basically m W Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 following. You know we've got a book. We've got emails. We've got texts. We've got you know messages from him on what he wanted to do here but he had his own tours so all we're doing is fulfilling that need but we never think that we need to go beyond what is the initial. We're actually dialing it back but when we're talking about if everything goes well it's just coming closer to the limits that the City has already established as a safe limit. Councilwoman Ryan: And so for as you had mentioned at the Planning Commission you anticipate in the first month the 4 peak days you had mentioned. Joel Weinshanker: 4 peak days. Councilwoman Ryan: 4 peak days. Joel Weinshanker: Yes. Councilwoman Ryan: And so what is your transportation plan for those 4 peak days? Joel Weinshanker: So we contracted with the Southwest Transit for our own parking spots for those 4 days. We hired 2 full sized buses that will allow basically one, every 10 minutes will be dropping off and every 10 minutes will be picking up. We've contracted with Carver County sheriff department where on those days, and very frankly they're having a little bit of trouble getting from one time period right now because I guess the sheriffs are exhausted because of the Ryder Cup but Saturday morning but they promise us they'll have it done so the only time we don't have fully staffed is Saturday morning the 8'b but they promised us in another day they will and we've offered to pay a little bit more if we had to. And we have an abnormally large amount of traffic people on the premises. Having 4 to 7 to 1 is 20 times what Disney does. Disney has 1 traffic person for almost 100 cars in the parking lot so we're making sure in the first several months is that we're killing people with, we're having too much of everything. We have too many buses so the buses will be empty but we're still only going to do. We're only looking at 6 buses. We looked at the traffic looked at 72 cars per hour but we're stopping at 40 so anything over 40 triggers the buses. We're only looking at 4 days in the first 90 so we're comfortable and obviously as we know as it gets colder and more into winter there's less of a likelihood and we're seeing the build come up week to week. We're pushing people away from opening day so we basically maxed out on opening day but still on opening day no more than, you're not going to see more than 6 buses per hour and you're not going to see more than 40 cars per hour. So we've done everything that Prince would do. We've been a responsible citizen because we've under estimated. We've gone well below what we think is realistic because we want it to succeed. Councilwoman Ryan: And just help me understand so when people buy the tickets they're directed at that point whether they're going to be on a bus or be able to drive? 31 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Joel Weinshanker: So now people are. People were not in the beginning. We left it a little ambiguous. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Joel Weinshanker: We've actually had so again each person who bought a ticket had to provide an email address. We've now emailed each of these people for those days. We have something, as of a couple of hours ago we checked over 97 percent of the people had opened up their emails and we're going to call each person who hasn't and instruct them but we've had great success. Prince fans are amazing. They really are. The majority of Prince fans understand that they have to be a good neighbor. That we have to be a good neighbor. Understand that Prince for 29 years was a great neighbor and I've never heard anything to, you know anything that really undermines that so once we explain to the fans, when we came out with that press release on Monday we were really astounded. We thought the traffic would be down 50-60 percent on Audubon. It's down, it's negligible. It's a couple of people a day. We actually had a wonderful elderly lady today who's taking ribbons off the fence and the security person said what are you doing? She goes I want to make sure all the fence is clear. Like she came there so that she could help just get everything out of there so we really feel that we've got a good plan. We're listening. You know even with the planning as Pat really much more eloquently than I ever could state it, we're listening to the city. It's important for us. The only way we're going to succeed is if you feel that we've succeeded. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Anything else? Councilman Campion, any questions or comments? Not required. Councilman Campion: Not at this time. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Let's see. Mr. Weinshanker you can sit down if you'd like. Mr. Mazural I have a couple questions that I really want you to answer for me. 'There's been a lot of emails, phone calls, social media referencing Prince would have never wanted this or Prince wanted this or et cetera. Is there a will? Pat Mazural: Mr. Mayor no there is not a will that's been found to this point and that was part of the appointment of the special administrator was to do that search. Mayor Laufenburger: So who's calling the shots on what can happen to, yeah maybe a better way of saying is who gives you the authority? Who gives Bremer Trust the authority to do what you're doing? Can you just talk a little bit about that and help me understand. Me and the rest of us here understand how do we know that this is what Prince wanted? Er. Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Pat Mazural: Certainly Mr. Mayor and council members. Well first of all the authority is given by the court. All that has been done in the estate has been with court order. Because there has not been a will located and because there are potentially issues as to who the rightful heirs are, Bremer Trust has engaged the family in conversations about this. They've gone to the court seeking approval on virtually every move that's been made which has included representation of the purported heirs at this point and so it's the court that gives the authority. From the beginning the idea of Paisley Park being a museum and a commemoration to Prince has been there and surfaced. From the time that we first engaged many more family members or purported family members than there are at this point and that was a relatively common theme at that point is that this is something he wanted to do. Since that time I can tell you that I've personally had this discussion with Kirk Johnson who has been the property manager for Paisley Park as a long time, 30 plus year friend of Prince. Basically his right hand person. His secretary. His property manager. His do whatever needs to be done and probably knew him better than anyone else and he's personally told me that Prince had expressed this desire for Paisley Park years ago and in fact Mr. Weinshanker that was new to me, perhaps something that's occurred with all of the continual searching that goes on in the archiving that in fact we now, which I didn't know before just a few minutes ago actually have texts and writings from Prince that express that desire. Mr. Johnson, Kirk Johnson had indicated to me in fact that Prince had attempted something like some tours back around 2000 and was beginning to try out the site for that purpose. So in terms of who has the authority, the court gives Bremer Trust as the special administrator the authority. In terms of the organization and the different entities that have been discussed here, a couple of them are new and have been formed as business purposes to manage this and the court has given authority to those organizations. But it all evolves from the estate of Prince Rogers Nelson. Mayor Laufenburger: So the court has made Bremer Trust the special administrator, is that correct? Pat Mazural: That's correct Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so Bremer Trust is really tasked with the fiduciary and management responsibility to deal with Prince's estate. Has, we're dealing with one piece of property, 7801 Audubon Road. Has the judge allowed Bremer Trust and it's associated companies recently formed to address other pieces of property as well? For example I'm thinking of Councilwoman Tjornhom's question regarding the property that's just west of Audubon. Is that owned by PRN Music Corporation? Is it owned by another entity independent of that? Help us understand that. Pat Mazural: Yeah and my understanding of that is there has been nothing specific with regard to the other parcels at this point. Nothing that's come before the court. However I'd like Todd Phelps, the real estate attorney to address that directly. He would have personal knowledge of that. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Mr. Mazural. Mr. Phelps would you state your name and your address please for the record. 47 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Todd Phelps: Todd Phelps, 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mayor Laufenburger: Welcome to Chanhassen Mr. Phelps. Todd Phelps: Thank you Mr. Mayor. Mr. Mayor, members of the council. With respect to the two parcels located immediately to the west on the southwest comer of Audubon and Highway 5, those two parcels are owned by a nonprofit corporation called Love For One Another Incorporated. It's a Minnesota nonprofit corporation. Mayor Laufenburger: Is it part, do you know is that part of the, let's just call it the Prince empire? I don't know if that's the right word but. Todd Phelps: It's a nonprofit corporation and I'm trying to, I want to explain this in a way that. Mayor Laufenburger: Don't confuse us with the facts. We're looking for simplicity. Todd Phelps: The nonprofit Love For One Another Incorporated was formed by Mr. Nelson. Having said that because of the nature of a nonprofit corporation the assets are actually held for the benefit or the purpose of the nonprofit so those. Mayor Laufenburger: I think what you're telling me, or the question you're answering for me is that it's not likely in the near future that that property would become available for development without approval of the nonprofit right? Todd Phelps: Mr. Mayor that's correct. And technically at this point those parcels are not part of the estate of Prince Rogers Nelson. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Thank you Mr. Phelps. Mr. Mazural. Any council member have any questions related to that? Okay. So it sounds like one of the questions that the council had here related to the fence has been answered and that is that the plan right now is to leave the fence as it is and to do your best to protect it from being a display of art, is that correct? Pat Mazural: That's correct Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Mr. Mazural there's a Site Improvement Performance Agreement. Are you fully aware of all of the elements of that Site Improvement Performance Agreement? Pat Mazural: I have read it. I would need to reference it. I have it with me. Mayor Laufenburger: But you have seen it and so it's, you know that there are things in there that are required from an administrative standpoint. M Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Pat Mazural: Yes Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. This question, this is not for you but for Ms. Aanenson. The hours of operation are not part of the PUD. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: What are the hours of operation that are allowed in the underlying business district? Kate Aanenson: Typically they're not restricted. For example General Mills runs 24 hours a day so typically they're not restricted. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So there is no restriction other than to the effect that if the hours of operation become a nuisance in any way then the City would, could step in is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct and that's how we would handle any other business in town that would create a noise or any other nuisance. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Mr. Mazural I reserve the right to recall you if I may but I think what I would like to do at this time is take about a 5 minute recess and then we're going to come back for a public comment period, okay? Pat Mazural: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: So we're going to recess. It's now 9:17. Well let's reconvene at 9:22. Pat Mazural: Thank you Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you. The City Council took a short recess at this point in the meeting. Mayor Laufenburger: So at this time I will reconvene the City Council meeting and I want to express my appreciation to all of you for being patient. This has been a deliberate process but there's a reason for that because the council is being asked to make an important decision tonight and we want to make sure that we have all of our questions answered and that it appears that the majority of them have been answered but we'll deal with that in just a few minutes. As I said a public hearing is normally part of the Planning Commission and there was a public hearing conducted at that time and that became part of the public record and you heard reference to that planning commission meeting earlier. So what I would like to do at this time is I'm interested in hearing from members of the audience that are with us this evening and my plan is to allow 49 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 comments to continue about 30 minutes or so as long as the comments are respectful and in accordance with the order of this council and this chamber and I'm going to ask that those, if anybody is present that was at the Planning Commission and spoke I would just ask that we already have your comments on record and I would ask that you allow somebody who was not present at that Planning Commission to speak first so at this time I'm going to just ask, is there any public comment? And if there is, I would like you to come forward and I will instruct you on how I'd like you to proceed. Anybody? I would ask that you state your name, your address for the record and then speak, or state whether or not you are supportive or you are in favor of the development, not in favor of the development or in support of the development with some concerns. Okay state your name please. Teawanna Burton: Hi, thank you for having me. My name is Teawanna Burton and my address is 3425 53'd Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55429. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay and are you speaking in opposition to or in support of the plan or in support of the plan with concerns? Teawanna Burton: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: A, B or C? Teawanna Burton: I'm going to have to say against. Mayor Laufenburger: Against the rezoning for it to be a museum. Teawanna Burton: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, state your reasons. Teawanna Burton: At this time. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Teawanna Burton: I was a volunteer for Prince this past 2'/2 years. I've been a fan since '76. I moved here from St. Louis in '92 because of him. Okay. To me this is too soon. I'm not arguing the fact that he wouldn't have want it to be a museum or historical monument but he hasn't been gone 6 months. He died inside of Paisley Park. He did not like to be looked upon as some kind of replica or you know some put on a platform that you just stare at him or what not so for me to say, having a museum at this time is to me too soon. It's intrusive. I think a year would have been suffice. People keep yelling but we need to make money for him for the taxes. He has money. He has property. I don't think doing this to pay the taxes is a reason. I think people while the iron is hot want to grab it before somebody else grab Paisley Park and make it what they want it to be or claim this what he would have wanted. It's like, it's not written in, on 50 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 paper like you said. There's no will so if somebody could say yeah, I've been with Prince for 20 years. I've worked for him. He's my best bud. Yeah he would have wanted a museum. To make a little bit light of the situation I learned from Judge Judy. If it ain't in writing, anybody can say, he could have told me 2 weeks before he passed, I was there the Saturday night, the last Saturday night. He had a party. He could have told me hey, if anything ever happened to me yeah you can go ahead and have my furniture. If I was to present that to you'all I'm quite sure you'd say well do you have any documentation? Do you have a recording? Do you have anything to prove that's what he said? So to me that's you know hearsay. Now as far as this summer what we was going to do was he wanted to have a party every weekend. Okay. He was doing the tours already these past 2 %2 years. He didn't have to reconstruct his parking lot. He didn't have to rearrange or treat the carpet from disintegrating or whatever the case may be. We have 40 people going at a time. The tours last 60 minutes because sometimes he will come down to the studio. Talk with the guests or walk them this way or what have you. We had it in an organized fashion. We, the parking situation, if he was having a big extravaganza, first of all we always had to get permits for everything he wanted to do that consists of guests being over a certain amount of money because of the fire zones and we had to have inspections and as far as parking in the neighborhood he respected the neighborhood because the daycare as well as the neighbors was like you've got cars blocking our driveway. There's trash here and there and there's cars you know blocks away so he asked his fans, which respected and listened to him, park your car at the park and ride. He paid for the shuttles to bring them to Paisley Park. That worked for a while but like you say that intersection of Highway 5 and Audubon gets congested. That turn lane, I have been in that turn lane all the time when I had to come. The light to turn is short but the holding time is long so you have cars more than 5 cars proceeding out to the on continuing traffic. Mayor Laufenburger: Step to the microphone. Teawanna Burton: I'm sorry. Mayor Laufenburger: You're being articulate with your hands, which is okay. Teawanna Burton: Okay, I'm sorry. Mayor Laufenburger: We have somebody who's recording this. I want to make sure she hears it. Teawanna Burton: Okay, I'm sorry. But that's a huge concern because you get your car sticking out in the lane and the light hasn't changed yet and then when you do make that left tum onto Audubon Road you get cars at a stand still because they see that first driveway and we're directing them to go and come around and then there's people running across the street and we like go to the light but they don't want to wait in line. I mean you've got some Prince fans that's hard headed. They don't want to listen. They want to do it their way. They figure they out number you so they'll do what they want to do. 51 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Pretty much like people all around the world is that right? Teawanna Burton: And we do get people all around the world. They either don't understand English or they're rude or whatever the case may be. Something that also touched me at the meeting with Graceland Holdings, I've been on Facebook and I've even said it. Prince did not want Paisley Park to be a prison. He wanted any and everybody to come as long as you respect the neighborhood and his property and each other. Okay you can't tell Prince fans don't come unless you have a ticket. You've got to keep or don't park over there or you can't leave flowers. Some people haven't had the opportunity to come and pay their respects so you gonna have people coming you know all different times. The winter time they're not coming. You know you'all have to worry about that. They're not coming but you have. Mayor Laufenburger: Wise statement. Teawanna Burton: You have anniversaries like his passing. His birthday. Summer break. People take their vacations so you can't really calculate the type of traffic, foot traffic and car traffic unless you sit back and watch these people come for a whole year because they come in spurts you know so you can't say oh well you know 2 buses will take up a lane and this and that and this and that. All those buses, even if you have 3, unless they're green buses which he tried to get further the concern of the neighborhood with pollution you know so you've got to take that in consideration. I've seen people at 5:00. I was there the day he died. I'm directing traffic. Cars. People getting off from work. You know school buses coming. That's a lot of traffic on that little two lane street and you're going to add buses. You're gonna have buses. Then you're going to have people like he said that park Come in and park then get their ticket. No, no, no, no, no. I've controlled traffic on that parking lot. I've had to back out people off of Paisley Park parking lot because they didn't have the proper credentials or they just wanted to drive up and see what was going on and it's like I can't let you get on the property because they have stayed there and it's like if she don't see me then she won't put me off the lot. Mayor Laufenburger: I don't want to be disrespectful but can you wrap up your comments in another minute or two? Teawanna Burton: Okay so you have concerns about the traffic, that's to be expected because I've worked it okay. And then telling fans when they can and can't come and when they can and can't lay down things to show respect for him. Now you'all was talking about that concrete barrier thing. Yeah that's been a life saver and I've even had to tell people don't sit on it because if you flip over you're road kill and we're not responsible so just an idea if you'all want to keep pushing for this museum that he said he wanted, I would advise that green area that has turned into mud and got mulched. Mayor Laufenburger: Now mulched. 52 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Teawanna Burton: But a sidewalk there and let that continue all the way and connect to the front of Paisley Park because there's a sidewalk there that goes in that tunnel so why not have a sidewalk to go all the way around. Not saying it's going to stop your problem from people running across the street but yeah, that driveway and where the daycare is, that's going to be your problem. And then you coming to the lights, telling people go to the light and come around, that's going to be a problem so just you know think about that but to me it's being rushed. It's too soon. The questions you'all asked I'm so glad you asked them and it is very important so. Mayor Laufenburger: Well thank you for the work that you did with Prince when he was with us and thank you for your comments. Teawanna Burton: Thank you. Thank you for having me. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there anybody else who would like to speak at this time? Good evening. Just state your name and your address please. Kim Huston: Kim Huston. Mayor Laufenburger: Do you want to pull that down a little bit? Kim Huston: 18977 Twilight Trail, Eden Prairie but I say Chanhassen. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, welcome to Chanhassen. Ms. Huston is that right? Kim Huston: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So the question is are you speaking in opposition, in support or in support with concerns? Kim Huston: In support with concerns. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you. Kim Huston: Good evening Mayor and City Council members. I am here to represent the Prince fans based on two issues regarding the plans for Paisley Park museum. First I am here to present the petition against the wall that was proposed to be built at the previous meeting held on September 20'b. I have brought a copy of the petition with me for your review. Our petition has been signed not only by the Rainbow Children, which is a group on Facebook that I'm an admin for but also fans all over the world. And they're concerned about the fate of Paisley Park. The bottom line is that we are the target market for the museum so our concerns should be crucial in the business plan because if it isn't addressed with everyone in mind it will affect the revenue and the success of the museum. Several people have stated that if a wall goes up they will not 53 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 come. It is in the best interest of all involved in making of the museum to ensure that it becomes a place that their target market will want to frequent again and again. During the previous meeting there was concerns for safety as a reason for a new opaque wall to be built but the current fence has never been an issue even when Price was home so there should be no safety concerns with keeping it. In fact if a wall is built making it impossible to see the building we believe that it will actually create a safety issue encouraging people to climb it in order to see the building or take pictures. We also feel that if we are not allowed to leave gifts on a solid wall construction and a solid wall construction is built people might tag it and deface it which will not only become an eyesore to the community but it will cost the museum more money for constant repainting which will affect their bottom line. As far as the gifts go that people are leaving several local neighbors have stated that they find the fence and the gifts to be charming and they even leave flowers and notes themselves. Others consider it a landmark of the city and enjoy seeing it when they pass by to see everything that people are leaving for him. It is unfair, it is an unfair expectation to state that people cannot come if they aren't attending the tours and that only paying customers have the right to leave gifts or even see the building. We need to come up with an agreement for a place to leave gifts. If Highway, if the Highway 5 side is safer because of the path then maybe that side can be designated for an area to still leave gifts. We are hoping that the statement that Paisley Park management regarding the fence and that they no longer intend on building an opaque wall or structure, whether it be solid construction or vegetation be written and included in the agreements made with the City going forward. We would also like to address the expansion of the parking lot on the north side of Paisley Park. Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. Huston can I just stop you for a second? So you heard the applicant say that they have changed their plan and they are not going to take down the fence, you have heard that? Kim Huston: Yes but their actual word is that they have no plan to do it at this time as long as the fence cooperates so they're not necessarily saying that they won't ever do it which means that at any time if one person leaves one flower they can say well you didn't listen and the wall is going up. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, your point well taken. Move to your, you said there's a second concern you have. Kim Huston: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, keep going. Kim Huston: So we're concerned about the expansion of the parking lot on the north side of Paisley Park so we are hoping that with the delay in the expansion of the parking lot that they can consider possibly those 2 other properties that were brought up before that are currently under Love For One Another charities to be a place where maybe parking off the main property 54 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 could be put across there and then a crosswalk could be created to make it so people can get across the street safely. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kim Huston: Because it has been made aware to us that PPark Management will eventually need not only additional parking but possible additional buildings that those properties could possibly be for that as well. In the interim we are asking that PPark Management use the existing parking on the grounds, street parking on the street across the way and then use the Chanhassen Transit Station as Prince was doing before. There are concerns from, I think recent concerns from Chanhassen citizens that that's going to increase traffic downtown Chanhassen but if these events are in the evenings it shouldn't really, you know the later night ones it shouldn't really affect the business traffic. Mayor Laufenburger: So just a second. Are you saying that people have expressed a concern that there would be more traffic downtown than desired? Kim Huston: I think there's recent concerns with some of the citizens and some of the business owners downtown in Chanhassen that possibly having a lot of shuttles going back and forth could affect them and affect the traffic in that area and so I just, we're thinking that if those are mostly evening and later night events that a lot of those businesses would not be open and it would also, the schools would be closed so it wouldn't create a lot of traffic for. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay I just, just intuitively I'm thinking that it surprises me that businesses downtown like retail establishments that they would want to deter people from coming downtown. That doesn't sound intuitive. Kim Huston: I think they were more worried about traffic and people being held up getting to and from one place to another. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Kim Huston: And those were some online concerns that we noticed so. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kim Huston: Lastly I would just like to say that April 21" was less than 6 months ago. Fans from all over the world are still grieving having not been able to properly pay their respects so we created our own with fans bringing gifts and using their artistic abilities to share with Prince the way they feel and you know leaving gifts for him. It is also important to note that Graceland was built 5 years after Elvis passed away and those fans had several years and a lot more time to mourn then way they wanted to and not be told that they can't leave gifts in any certain area. Prince built Paisley Park with the intent of having visitors and not having walls to keep us out. 55 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 He made it a beautiful place for him to create his music and share it with us. He invited us to his home and said it was our home as well and to take care of it and that's why we're here today. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Ms. Huston. Thank you very much. Is there anybody else who would like to speak? You know the drill? Linda Paul: My name is Linda Paul. I live at 8696 Stonefield Lane. I am in support with concerns. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Linda Paul: What I'd like to know is some of the things have been brought up about the traffic. You've discussed the fact that MnDOT can change the timing on that light. Do they do that on the fly? Is it a permanent change? Is it? Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. Paul, address your question here okay. Linda Paul: Sorry. And if they can do that why haven't we been doing that on the Saturday mornings when that backs up for the Cars and Coffee for the Auto Motorplex? Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Linda Paul: Another question is we say we're going to use the Google and such to direct people to Highway 5. Mayor Laufenburger: I don't know that we said we were going to do it but the idea has been discussed yeah. Linda Paul: Well people have proposed that option to ensure. I also know when people are sitting in traffic they grab their iPhone and go Siri give me an alternate route so I'm not how effective that would be keeping people on Highway 5 because I live down on, just off of Audubon down near Lyman. That's where my personal concern comes in. I'm curious why this security staff that are standing out on the far opposite sides of the gates haven't been telling the people who are crossing right at McGlynn to please walk down to the light and cross at a controlled intersection because I have to drive up and down Audubon regularly when I'm going to downtown to grocery shop. To go to Target. That kind of stuff and people just walk out in front of you and it's dangerous and they don't care that you're driving in a 45 miles per hour speed limit. They're there to see Prince and they don't care that there's traffic coming. A question and concern for the applicant is, how do they guarantee that people will leave the property within a 2 hour time limit because they say that's how they've decided how much parking they need is that they have so many tours and that kind of stuff and that people will leave within 2 hours so then they've cleared out those spots for people coming in. In addition with the W Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 hours of operation they say they've narrowed it down til 7:00 p.m. Does that mean that the last tour starts at 7:00 p.m. and if that's an hour tour does it go til 8:00 and then. Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. Paul I think in that situation as I recall it was, they will vary the ending time and I think in every case the ending time was assumed to be that's when the last tour will begin. Linda Paul: Okay, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: That's what I heard council. Is that what you heard council? Okay. But good question. Linda Paul: I have observed that they did put in the one lane to connect the south lot to the north lot but come next spring when those permanent changes which are due within 12 months of moving the north entrance to that 220 feet south of the intersection and adding the additional parking. Right now they just have this one little narrow probably 8 foot swath of asphalt going from the south lot to the north lot so people can queue up. Then they've got to stand there and they say you can stay. You can go and point you back out there. Well at some point you're going to be tearing that all up. Moving that entrance south. Closing it. What's going to happen to the traffic in the timeframe when all that construction is going on? So I would like that addressed and again the people in my neighborhood have to drive up and down Audubon to get access to Highway 5. To get into downtown. Thank you very much. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you very much Ms. Paul. Let's just talk about a couple of these things. Not sure who this goes to but Mr. Oehme or Ms. Aanenson or maybe even the applicant. Is there any reason why the security people who are contracted by Paisley Park, do they have a responsibility to police the pedestrian traffic on the public streets? Do they have that responsibility? Kate Aanenson: I'll let the applicant address that. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Mazural, what instructions do you give to the security people that are inside the Paisley Park campus? Pat Mazural: Well I think it's helpful to understand that up until this point there has not been an operator of the property. It's a piece of real estate. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh that's right. That's right. Pat Mazural: That is in the estate and it's been the responsibility of the special administrator to assure security of the property. That it's continued maintenance and that private security firm there is really for security of the property within the fence. 57 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so there's really no instructions for them to do anything to police outside of the property is that correct? Pat Mazural: That's correct. Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Yes sir, Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: I think we could ask counsel but they don't have any authority beyond their property line so I could understand why they wouldn't be doing it. I mean that would be up to the county sheriff who has jurisdiction over that area. Your private security doesn't have that kind of jurisdiction. Would you agree with that? Roger Knutson: I certainly would agree with that. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright thank you for that clarification. Let's see, maybe this is for the operator Mr. Weinshanker. How do you intend to manage the departure of people after the tours? The question was you know you're assuming that people are going to be cooperative and once they walk out of the tent and return to their vehicle they're going to leave. Joel Weinshanker: Yes which is a good question. So obviously the tour's very structured to be pushing people through. Mayor Laufenburger: Sure yeah, while they're inside the building. Joel Weinshanker: While inside the building. Once they're even through the tent, once they're there a specific amount of time they're walking through and then once they walk through we have parking people so once they come through they're going to be, and again could 2 people stay an extra 20 minutes and just by walking around? Possibly but there's going to be nothing to do and they're going to be encouraged to go to their spots like we've done in other places. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Let's see. This was an interesting question that Ms. Paul raised. By the way I've done exactly what she has suggested that if I get in some traffic I, not while I'm driving but my wife will say give me an alternate route so I know that that happens but I think, well so let's address this question about the light change. Mr. Oehme or Ms. Aanenson, do you know anything about, does MnDOT do anything to control the traffic on that first Saturday when Autoplex does their Cars and Coffee? Paul Oehme: I'm not aware that they would or have. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. 58 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Paul Oehme: So it's the City has requested that MnDOT look at signal timing at specific times during certain events but I'm not aware that on certain Saturday mornings that we've ever made that request of MnDOT. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah. How many people, what is Cars and Coffee, how long is that? Mr. Gerhardt do you know how long that lasts on that first Saturday? Todd Gerhardt: Oh I believe it's about 4 hours. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, do we have any estimate on how many people come during that 4 hours? Todd Gerhardt: Oh, a lot. I would say definitely over 250. Mayor Laufenburger: Cars or people? Todd Gerhardt: Cars. Mayor Laufenburger: And I don't mean to make light of that but that is an exceptional situation and you know we've learned and I say this to everybody here, Ms. Paul as well, we've learned that there is special attention that's required for that event and we have additional officers on duty down there. We have people actually doing pedestrian crossing there so we're very aware of the impact of that time period and we're also very aware that there are some people that abuse it and I know from recent reports that we issued citations and thank heavens there are even sometimes that the police stop the pursuit because pursuing a high speed vehicle whether it's a motorcycle or a super charged 1991 GTO also endangers lives so I understand the concern Ms. Paul but I think that it would be very safe to say that we're watching that very closely to ensure that that event on top of the tours does not get out of hand. And we listen to citizens a lot saying, say your address again? Linda Paul: 8696 Stonefield Lane. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so you're down, you're a little south of what we describe as the bird neighborhood is that correct? Linda Paul: I'm in the bird neighbor. Mayor Laufenburger: My point is is that we're very aware of the impact of that in our community but at the same time these are people who are coming into our community and they're patronizing the shops and the businesses in Chanhassen and I have no interest in deterring that by any means so I know you may have another comment but I appreciate the comments that you made at the microphone. 59 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Linda Paul: One. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh, if you wouldn't mind stepping up here. We have a lady who's recording this. Linda Paul: I appreciate the fact that they do have a county officers right there at Park Road allowing the crosswalk to happen there because as the pedestrian crosswalk from Lyman all the way up to Highway 5 the sidewalk starts on the west side. Crosses to the east side. Comes up to Park. Crosses back to the west side and takes you back all the way up to that so even if I just wanted to ride my bike or walk the length of Audubon Road between Lyman and Highway 5. Mayor Laufenburger: You're required to cross. Linda Paul: You are required to cross the road twice. That's our concern as residents in that area down south of Park Road. Mayor Laufenburger: We have some great trails down in that area Ms. Paul. I'm thinking of Bluff Creek and all of those trails that are far away from the road. I hope you've had a chance to use some of those. Linda Paul: Yes but sometimes you're trying to get to downtown and I need to go up Audubon to get there and I have to cross the road twice to do it. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Linda Paul: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Paul. Is there anybody else that would like to make a comment at this point? Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: There was another question that Ms. Paul had about the construction plans. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh yes, excuse me. Mr. Oehme. We often conduct construction on buildings and properties that are already in place. Is a construction permit required for that? Paul Oehme: There is permits that would have to be required yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, and do those permits also require how traffic is managed or how construction materials are prevented from blowing off the property and stuff like that? Paul Oehme: That's correct and we also look at how the project would be staged too to accommodate on site traffic or traffic that's adjacent to the property as well. E Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And Mr. Weinshanker if there was, if it was necessary for, you can step to the microphone. If it was necessary to stop activity on the site for a period say a week to accommodate construction would you be willing to do that? Joel Weinshanker: Absolutely. We'd be willing to do whatever's necessary. We've talked with two companies. One that actually did the work and they're looking at 2 days. 2 '/2 days. They sort of laughed at us when we asked if there was enough time to complete it because the road that they did, albeit small they knocked out in a couple of hours so none of what we're talking about doing with the parking lot expansion is taking any real time. And if we do it at a time in low season we could actually close off the entire north parking lot and close off the entire road and still allow 20 or 25 cars an hour to park. Or actually well yeah, to park in the south lot. Mayor Laufenburger: Did that cover it? Councilwoman Ryan: It did for now, yes. Mayor Laufenburger: It did for now, okay thank you. Is there anybody else who would like to offer public comment at this time? Audience: I have one quick question. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah I appreciate you may have a question but I really would like to hear from some others. Audience: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: State your name and address and then if you're in. Kristin Kokkila: My name is Kristin Kokkila. My address is 13875 85' Place North in Maple Grove. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay and are you in opposition, in support, or in support with concerns? Kristin Kokkila: Support with concerns. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, take a deep breath and begin. Kristin Kokkila: Yeah. I have things here that were actually supposedly taken down from the fence and put, and catalogued and taken photos of and such. My question is, I'm not sure why these were laying in the mud. I have a whole. Oh I'm sorry, does that go? Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: May I call you Kristin? 61 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Kristin Kokkila: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: And you said that these were taken down and catalogued? Kristin Kokkila: Well that's what the newspaper has said and that's what they said just now. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, how many of these items do you have? Do you have a lot? Okay, alright. And what's your question or concern Kristin? Kristin Kokkila: My concern I guess is that if there's not a place for people to put things and if they do go and put something on the fence then we're like told that then there's going to be a huge fence put up. I don't, I think there needs to be a place that there can be mementos left even if it's I don't know, maybe down by the creek where they didn't take down the mementos, well at least that I didn't see last week when I went on Tuesday. Mayor Laufenburger: So it sounds to me like what you're saying is, you think or you would like to see or you think that Prince fans would like to see a special area that is allowed for these type of memorials. Is that what you're saying? Kristin Kokkila: Right. Yeah. I have, I mean there are things from people from around the world in here. From Australia to Berlin to San Francisco to Texas. Everywhere. I've tried to find the owners for them to either give them back. I don't know what to do with them if they're not, you know I mean this one it clearly has clips on it. That just doesn't falloff the fence in the wind so I just, I don't know what happened. I do know that when they came down and took the things off the fence for May 20'. Mayor Laufenburger. That was for, when they brought in a, what do they call it? A historical preservation team. Kristin Kokkila: Yes. Yes and I was there and I saw how they were taking down the things and such and that they were in a nice manner and that it was orderly and every section of the fence was done properly and pictures were taken. I know that because I was there and you know for people then to see this and like you know, I mean they put their hearts into this. Really so and I mean the trip here is not cheap and so I think to pay for maybe a section of fence for $500 for people to put up things would just be kind of, I think just a nice thing for Prince fans to be able to show their love and support. Mayor Laufenburger: Just a couple things that I'd like to say. First of all your efforts to try to find the owners of these things, I think that's to be commended. I think that we have certainly learned over the last 5 '/z months that Prince fans are indeed passionate. I don't think there's any, there's no such thing as a cool Prince fan. Everybody is a hot. Cool as in temperature because all Prince fans are cool but Prince fans are hot in their passion for his legacy and so I understand 62 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 how people would have this passion so I commend you for that. But I also want to say the reality is the fence is private property and once something gets put on the fence it becomes private property and that's outside of the realm of what the City can address. It's outside of the realm of really what the whoever places it there can address. You understand that Kristin? Kristin Kokkila: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay alright. But thank you for coming down from Maple Grove and thank you for demonstrating your love for the artist. Kristin Kokkila: Yeah, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: I think you wanted to say something. Please state your name. Letitia Nadine Dyer: My name's Letitia Nadine Dyer and I live at 8280 Market Boulevard here in Chanhassen. Mayor Laufenburger: Could I ask you just to spell your last name? Letitia Nadine Dyer: D -y -e -r. Mayor Laufenburger: Dyer. Letitia. Welcome Letitia. Are you speaking in opposition, in support or in support with concerns? Letitia Nadine Dyer: In support with concerns. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, Letitia please. Letitia Nadine Dyer: So I'm not opposed to Paisley Park studios becoming a museum if those were indeed Prince's wishes but I'm put off by this rush to get it done. Prince was a perfectionist in every thing he did and the music and the concerts and every time he invited us into his home it was about the experience of the people that came. When you went to his show he was concerned about your experience in watching his show and so this rush to get everything planned and executed, and if it's going to have Prince's name on it then it should be, it should live up to Prince's standards and what they're doing does not. It feels like the sole objective is just to tum a quick dollar and not to preserve his legacy and his legacy is about excellence. It's about love. It's about openness. It's about family and it's not about money. Just some of the things that they brought out during the supposed traffic studies, and I know going down Market Boulevard, or I'm sorry going down Highway 5 on Saturday just trying to get to Lifetime to work out there's always a little back up right about there and it's, this is going to increase it. There's, I mean it's going to really impact people's lives. You see people walking down Audubon Road not necessarily to see Paisley Park but people who live there who want to walk over to Lake Ann. I mean it's a nice community. I'm from Dallas so you don't get to walk everywhere in Dallas. 63 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 6 t, r Here I could walk, I would walk to work. I work in Chanhassen. I live in Chanhassen. I could walk all the time. I mean I don't but it's a possibility and if they're blocking Audubon Road people are not going to be able to walk to Lake Ann or to the store or wherever they want to go just because they happen to pass by Paisley Park doesn't mean that that's their goal. You know that's just part of the community. And I think it takes time to really understand how something this big is going to impact the community and it's important that we take the time to understand that and do it the right way. And like Ms. Huston said it was several years before they opened Graceland to the public and it gave people time to mourn. It gave them time to plan and it gave them time to really think about the impact that that was going to have on the community and be part of the legacy. That's it, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you for your comments Ms. Dyer. I think we have time for just a couple more comments if there's anybody. Please. State your name and address please. Anna Bader: Good evening. My name is Anna Bader, 18903 Hanus Road, Minnetonka. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Anna Bader: I live nearby. I've been. Oh sorry? Mayor Laufenburger: Are you speaking in opposition, in support or in support with concerns? Anna Bader: In support with concerns, thank you Mayor. I live nearby and I have been visiting Paisley Park for a very long time. I'm a very big Prince fan and I know it is a concern with safety and I appreciate all the work the team members here and the council members have done to do research on those safety concerns. I just wanted to add to some of the comments previously about the memorials that are being left for Prince. The reality is that people still want to leave those and just like we talked about people are going to run across the street when they're at the Cars and Coffee or we're still going to have that desire from fans so it's more a comment geared towards Bremer Trust and the Graceland enterprises to consider a way that fans can continue to leave mementos and really give their love to Prince because they are so passionate about him because of the legacy he leaves behind. Prince fans don't want this to be about money. They want this to be about him and they want to connect to him so my comment is just to give fans that opportunity. I have people from all over the world who have asked me to put things at the fence and I go and I do it and I film it for them and it's very moving for them. It helps them grieve so it's just a request that you would consider that as Graceland and Bremer Trust to give fans some method where they can put some portion of the fence, have that dedicated for fans. Yeah we know it will eventually be taken down but I mean people really feel a very spiritual connection to Paisley Park and to Prince and to have something like an artwork that they created for Prince left there, even if it's for one day is very special to them. Thank you very much. M Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Ms. Bader. I think we have time for perhaps one more. Just a moment, did you speak at the Planning Commission? Denise Choiniere: I did briefly. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Just is there anybody who was not at the Planning Commission who would like to speak? Denise Choiniere: Hi, thank you. My name is Denise Choiniere. I live on 8481 Bittern Court in Chanhassen. For point of reference I live on the very first cul-de-sac off of Heron which is the very north most cul-de-sac in the neighborhood as you go south on Audubon. And my comments are. I did speak. Mayor Laufenburger: Are you speaking in opposition, in support or support with concerns? Denise Choiniere: I'm sorry, support with concern. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Denise Choiniere: I think I'd echo most of what everyone else has said tonight. I think Prince has only been gone not even 6 months so it does feel soon. My biggest concern is that even before the museum opens when I go out of Heron and try to go south on Audubon to take my son to high school for the multiple activities, I already have a challenge with getting out of the intersection safely as I'm turning left with northbound traffic and I expect there will be more northbound traffic. Mayor Laufenburger: And you're taking your, you said your son to high school is that correct? Denise Choiniere: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: And so what time of day is that? Denise Choiniere: Pardon? Mayor Laufenburger: What time of day is that? Denise Choiniere: Sometimes it's in the morning. Right now he has marching band at 7:00 a.m. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Denise Choiniere: Sometimes it's any time after school. Any time after 3:00 as late a 9:00. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Al Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Denise Choiniere: Especially with he's in the pit orchestra so I expect it could even be as late as 10:00 so many of the same hours that the museum will be operating. And so as we do the traffic study I know that they focused on the northern part of Audubon but I'd like to remind you that that traffic if it is coming on Audubon will be coming all the way from Lyman north to get to Paisley Park and Highway 5. And so I would encourage that the traffic study does consider how this impacts our neighborhoods. We don't have lights. We're all sitting at a stop sign waiting for traffic to clear. The other concern I have is we have a lot of high school students in those neighborhoods who drive to school. I see the chances they take now with the current traffic. It's not pretty. There's also been a lot of accidents down at Lyman and that short stretch going to Cban High School so I think you need to consider that as we increase traffic during school years that is going to be an impact. The traffic study was done the weekend before school started on that Monday. I would encourage us to stretch a little further than just looking at average numbers from the DOT and actually have some live experience much like some of you have visited Paisley Park and experienced that traffic. Drive up and down during some of those times and see what traffic really does look like. Come through my neighborhood and sit at that stop sign or the one on Osprey where that hill is coming up so steep you can't see the traffic coming. Be the kid on the bicycle who's trying to cross because they're trying to get to school. Bluff Creek's not that far away either so I just want us to be conscious of you know, I've lived there for over 25 years. Prince has been a great neighbor and I'd really be sad if something really sad happened because we didn't do a really thorough good job of looking at traffic. 'Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you. Mr. Pacyna can you just restate for us what was the date of the traffic study, just to clarify? Matt Pacyna: Mr. Mayor, just to clarify the date of the traffic study or the date the traffic data was collected? Mayor Laufenburger: Oh the date the traffic data was collected. Matt Pacyna: Okay the day that we actually collected a couple different times. We collected on Thursday, August 25`s and then we also collected a Saturday condition as well during that same timeframe which was on August 27`ti and then we did a follow up on the Autoplex Saturday of I believe it was September 3' and collected traffic volumes along Audubon during that period as well. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Did I hear this correctly that you were estimating 600 additional cars per day south on Lyman, is that correct? Matt Pacyna: That would be under the sold out condition. A max. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh a max. .a 6 4 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Matt Pacyna: A max condition without any reductions. Basically sold out shows throughout the entire day from the hours of operations from 9:00 to 9:00. We didn't assume any reductions as far as transit so that was trying to really represent a worst case condition. Mayor Laufenburger: And you referenced an average daily traffic on Audubon, I think did you say 5,000? You can check your... Matt Pacyna: So typical volumes are right around that 4,400 today volume. They're actually a little bit lower further to the south in that 3,300 range the closer you get to Lyman so traffic volumes are a little bit higher the northern part of Audubon than they are on the southern part and you know south of the Paisley Park site we would expect that traffic volume to increase by about 600 assuming about a 15 percent... Mayor Laufenburger: So that's the average daily traffic right now is as low as let's say, use your number. You said 4,400? So 600 additional cars and again that would be a max and that would be assuming that they go all the way south to Lyman, so let's assume that. That would be an increase of about 14 percent. Matt Pacyna: Ballpark yes. Mayor Laufenburger: And how many cars did you say that that road is designed to handle? Matt Pacyna: It's a two lane facility so our planning level thresholds I mean easily typically in the 5,000 to 10,000 for an urban facility without any tum lanes and then if you start to add some tum lanes that can actually increase as well. Mayor Laufenburger: So we're looking at, we're looking at quite possibly around 50 percent of capacity even with the addition of those 600 cars? Matt Pacyna: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alrighty. Okay I think I'm going to close the public comment period. Thank you very much to all of those of you that did comment and thank you for respecting the chamber and the council with your comments and the manner in which you presented them. I'm going to bring this back now to the council for any additional questions, discussion or a motion. Kate would you please put the motion up just so we have it available for reference if you wouldn't mind. Okay, yes Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I'm going to start out the way the public hearing started out where people speak in favor, in support and against or with support with concerns and I am definitely a person that would be on the side of in support with concerns. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. 67 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Councilwoman Tjornhom: I have concerns and I have concerns from the very start of the process. I think it's very unprecedented that we've had this big of a change in our community, a zoning change, potentially usage change and we never had one work session regarding it. I think the Planning Commission didn't have time to do it's due diligence when it came to our Comprehensive Plan and the rezoning of Paisley Park to a museum. I think that the Comprehensive Plan that we really use as a road map to our future, and we've designed that plan to fit our community the way it is now. We have not designed it or looked at it with the implication or the impact of having a museum and a potential entertainment center or the future and what that museum brings to our community. We haven't looked at the impact of that with our community. Right now we have a Comprehensive Plan that deals with the Met Council projections for number of households and we also have our land and we have it zoned it with potential of businesses coming in and neighborhoods being developed. Not necessarily being a tourist attraction and because of that I think that we have one chance to get this right and for our community being rushed into such a major decision I just don't think we're being good stewards and good citizens. Good representation to our citizens. Mr. Weinshanker who's been wonderful talking about being a good neighbor and being very open with plans and working with the City I think started his public comments out by saying it's a work in progress and it really is a work in progress and I believe that it's not complete. We still have way more answers than we have questions and I think that legally we have time to sit down as a council, as a Planning Commission to really get those questions answered because once this opens up it's not going to close down and so then we'll just be dealing with problems that we don't have solutions for that we could have figured out before it even started so I'm going to request that we table this and bring it back to council after it's been thoroughly looked at from the Planning Commission and staff. Mayor Laufenburger: We don't normally act on requests. Is that what you're leaving it at right now? Councilwoman Tjornhom: If we're not sometimes during comments you'll ask for a motion too but I would make a motion that the City Council consider tabling this and bringing it back after stafl; Planning Commission and council have had time to analyze and assess the impacts that this will have to our community. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay I think what I need Councilwoman Tjornhom is if you want to make a motion make a motion. Just the action that you want. Not the supporting reasons why so. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay, Mr. Mayor I'd like to make a motion that the City Council tables the rezoning of Paisley Park. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Knutson I have a question for you. Can you help me with something? Roger Knutson: Certainly. W a 4( 7 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Does a motion to table require a time constraint or until a period of time? Roger Knutson: It's usually preferable to do it that way but not necessarily. Mayor Laufenburger: Not required? Roger Knutson: But I would just point out that if we take the full 120 days that would put you out til December 23`d and if you hadn't acted by December 23`d it would be automatically approved. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Do you want to leave your motion as it is Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. The motion is to table the rezoning of the, table the action to rezone. Councilman McDonald: Question on the motion. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilman McDonald: The question I have on a motion you've put it forward so that at the burden falls upon the City. Planning Commission, staff. Is that your real intent or is the intent that the City would work with the applicant to come up with the proper planning? That's what I'm not sure about. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I think that your wordage probably is better than mine was. Of course I would direct staff to work with the applicant. Councilman McDonald: Thank you. Councilwoman Tjornbom: Thank you Councilman McDonald. Mayor Laufenburger: What I'm trying to determine is if I have a valid motion. Mr. Knutson do I have a valid motion? Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. I have a valid motion to table the rezoning. Is there a second? w Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Councilwoman Ryan: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay I have a motion and a second. Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor may I ask? Mayor Laufenburger: Just a moment. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay Mayor Laufenburger: Just a moment. Okay, now questions or discussion. Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: My question and seconding that motion to Councilwoman Tjornhom's point, I think it's imperative that the council is also involved in some of these conversations to ask the applicant questions as well. In my review of this my biggest concern, like Councilwoman Tjornhom's was is that council never had an opportunity to have a work session to discuss this application. This concept and so that concerned me. Secondly, well I'll just leave it at that. So is there an opportunity that council will also have time to discuss this with staff and/or the applicant? Mayor Laufenburger: Well we don't know that yet because we don't know whether or not this motion will pass. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay, okay. Mayor Laufenburger: But any other questions or discussion? Mr. McDonald do you have any comment? Councilman McDonald: Well I've got comments. Always have comments. I guess the thing is, I will speak to Ms. Tjornhom's motion and I'll speak to the other motion if we get to that. Mayor Laufenburger: Only speak to the. Councilman McDonald: I will only speak to her motion at this point. Mayor Laufenburger: Please. Councilman McDonald: My concern with tabling this motion at this point, I'm concerned about the timeline and to Ms. Ryan's point about council being involved I'm just not convinced that 120 days is sufficient time to do what I feel needs to be done on this entire motion that's before us so because of that I guess I cannot support your motion but I do want to at least put out there why and the reason is I do not believe that there is sufficient time for council to be involved and WE Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 for everybody to do their due diligence that they need to do so I will be voting against the motion. Mayor Laufenburger: Any other question or comment? Mr. Campion did you want to make any comment? Not required. Councilman Campion: I would. Mayor Laufenburger: Not required. Councilman Campion: No I would count myself as a Prince fan as well and I would like to see the museum go forward. I do though share the sentiments that it would be nice to have more time to work through more of the details to ensure that you know as we go forward it is something that we're all proud of. I'll leave my comments at that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Normally I would say what are the concerns that you have that need to be addressed? Oh Ms. Aanenson, is there a minimum time that we must deliberate on an application like this? Is there a minimum time required? You said the maximum is 120 days right? Kate Aanenson: I mean you can go through the Planning Commission once and the City Council in one hearing. It can happen that way sure. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. What I've seen, first of all the fact that this is desired to be a museum, this isn't new news. I mean this didn't occur on August, what was the date? 19th? Councilman McDonald: I thought it was the 22°d. Mayor Laufenburger: The 22'. This isn't new news. From the day that Prince passed away there was speculation and a conversations related to what was going to happen to Paisley Park so I can't agree with the notion that this is new news. Furthermore from my perspective in looking at this the applicant, and I'm saying the applicant Bremer Trust in cooperation with Stinson Leonard, the firm that is helping with the real estate and also the operator, they have been fully responsive to the requests that the City has made including elements related to the traffic study. Things like that. There is also a requirement on the part of the City, city staff to ensure that if it's rezoned a museum it is the city staff responsibility to ensure that the preparation of the site meets city standards. It's just unclear to me what additional time will give us. We know Mr. Weinshanker has told us that he's already throttled back the, throttled back from the maximum rickets. He's throttled back from parking only to incorporate buses. We already have a site improvement plan that requires an additional traffic study. We already have a site improvement plan that incorporates elements of the, elements of the property that will include parking expansion. It will include moving the, moving the entrance. Excuse me the egress from the current north entrance to 100 feet south of that so we have, while I recognize it's less than 120 71 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 days but we have a great deal of information related to what their plans are including they're changing their plans related to the fence which was a big issue and now they're saying that they're going to leave the fence in place. I have concerns too. I had concerns on April 21", would the City, would the citizens, would the city staff be prepared for the visitors that are going to come to Chanhassen and clearly evidence shows that we as a city, citizens, city staff, et cetera performed remarkably. There's no question in my mind that the same guidance that the city staff provided for all of the unexpected situations, that same guidance and experience that was in place then remains in place today. So frankly I understand your desire to slow down but we're not running. I don't believe that the operator intends to run. I believe the operator intends to yes, the opening coincides with a family plan. Is it a family planned tribute concert is that correct Mr. Mazural? Pat Mazural? That's correct Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, so the family has planned a tribute concert and yes there will be people coming from lots of places and yes they do want to pay tribute to Prince through a participation and a tour of his, of his facility. If Prince were alive and there was a concert going on those, pardon? If Prince were alive and there was a concert going on in town and he wanted to invite people over to Paisley Park he would do that and we would allow that. So I'm, I have yet to hear what I think is a real valid concern about what a delay will give us that moving forward with the museum with the caveats that the city staff has put on the planned unit development and the site improvement plan does not protect us so that's a concern that I have. Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: Mr. Mayor, so I guess if I could ask a clarifying question or you know in the interest of potentially adding a date or you know to amend the motion. If there is a specific issue to be resolved that would or you know set of issues to trigger it coming back to council. Mayor Laufenburger: Well frankly I'd like to hear what issue is to be resolved if you're offering that Mr. Campion. What issue is to be resolved? Councilman Campion: One issue I could consider or throw out there for discussion would be maybe to define the throttling. To what level we would throttle the participation until the north entrance is moved 220 feet south. You know something that's more definite that would restrict the traffic flow to a certain level until that infrastructure is put in place. That's one potential. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. McDonald, you have a comment? Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor I was going to save these for basically the motion. I have a number of concerns and I just, you know as I said I do not believe that the current motion addresses those. I do not think that we have any idea of what happens with the impact further down on Audubon Road and that concerns me. I was on the council when we put in the sidewalks and we improved roads and the neighbors came and told us about the problems that 72 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 they were going to be having. Now we're going to impact those more. I don't know how much and I haven't heard how much. It may be nothing. Mayor Laufenburger: Haven't we heard? Councilman McDonald: No. What we heard was selectively on a couple of days that I do not think a representative of the normal flow on that road would be like and what I look at for a normal flow is you take the time during the fall part of the year when school is in session and you have everybody working down there, that's going to be one number. You can take the number in the summer which they took toward the tail end and that's going to be another number and that will be a lesser number just because you've thrown out some of the big impact that can be had on that road so I'm not convinced we know what the impact is throughout those neighborhoods and I think that needs to be looked at. The other thing I did not get a good answer about the pedestrians. I really believe that the safety of how you're going to treat those and that falls mainly upon the applicant because it is on their property and as I said we have no authority on their property just like they have no authority on our property which are the roads so that needs to be addressed. You cannot just say we put out emails to the fans and they're going to behave. Fans do not behave as this one lady back here said. They're going to do what they want to do because whatever reason they put the blinders on and they're convinced that they're right and they will go forward and do it. I know this because I work with people on a daily basis. I am an attorney and I deal with people that put the blinders on and they get into a lot of trouble so I am not convinced that you can just tell me they're going to behave. I want to see a plan how we're going to do it. Then we bring up the issue as these ladies did about the fence. I had never thought about this and I thank you for bringing it up but I think you do need to have something for those fans that want to come up and mourn Prince's passing. They have done that now by putting up the signs. The artwork. Whatever. It's individualized. That needs to be addressed. I see nothing in the plan to address that. Granted it's not part of anything the City would do but if you want to be a good neighbor and Prince would have done this you would include it in your plan. How are you going to accommodate all these people? I also believe it is way too soon after Prince's death to try to say we're going to do this. This takes time and planning and I don't see that taking place here so that's why I have a real problem with both the motion and the motion that Councilwoman Tjornhom has brought up because I think people need to do their homework. And I will say this, look I've been on the council for a number of years. I have been trained as to how we do things. We take our time in doing things. I have turned down numerous people because they wanted, trust me we're going to do this. No. We're not going to trust you. We vote against it until you deliver a plan. I just spent last week telling people that came before this council that we had done a plan and that I was convinced that plan was valid and it needed to move forward. I feel. Mayor Laufenburger: That was a different plan. Councilman McDonald: That was a different plant. I'm talking about plans in general and the way that the City handles these things. We tend to take our time and to look at things and to 73 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 a 140 make sure it is alright. I can go back to a number of developments that have come into this town that have failed because of lack of planning. I see no difference here except for the fact that yes, it's Prince. It's Prince's museum which I will state I am in favor of. I think that you should do it. I just don't think you've put enough thought into it yet so you're looking for reasons why this shouldn't go forward. I think there are enough there to ask the question and get an answer. I'm just not convinced you can do it in 120 days. I could be wrong and if that's the case that's fine but as everyone has said council has not been involved in this and I think our tradition is council needs to be involved. We're the ones who ask those final questions. I agree with you mayor, staff does a marvelous job. You know my hat's always off to them. I'm always amazed but I do not feel that this is a situation where we can just take what staff has given us and we go forward with it without being able to correct it. I had asked if there were a way that we could you know do this on a temporary basis just to find out the answers to these problems. I understand we can't do that so I am left with a choice of voting yes or no and you know based upon that I can't support these motions. Either Ms. Tjornhom's or the one before the council but those are the reasons why I think the rest of council is a little bit concerned about all this is the scope of this, you've done a great job within the fences. No doubt about that but what about outside the fences? I don't think that that has been addressed the way it should and I think that's what the rest of council is trying to say. I could be wrong. I won't speak for them. They can all chime in but those are my reasons why I can't support this. Mayor Laufenburger: Any other comments? Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Going back to why we're here, we're here to rezone a property and we are turning into a PUD and usually a PUD means that there's give and take. The applicant gets something unusual or something out of the ordinary and the City or the residents get something back for that with change and I'm going to read you what supposedly the PUD, what the residents from Chanhassen are getting in exchange for this rezoning to a museum which is a major tourist attraction. Let's see the PUD states provides for limitations on how the building can be used including hours of operation, traffic flow and parking. I'm not sure that that sentence is accurate because when it comes to hours of usage it's kind of loosey goosey still. You know we talked about how yeah they're going to have hours of operation during the weekdays and even that has been inconsistent with this hearing tonight and then we talked about the concerts they're going to have and the hours that that could be. How long they could be going on. And quite frankly like you just said in General Mills they don't even have hours because it's 24 hours a day so I'm not sure how limiting hours and the traffic flow obviously is still a concern and parking is still a concern and so I just think this first statement, it doesn't really, it doesn't count for a PUD for why it would be a good trade off. It preserves the existing building. That too, that could be anything that, any business that comes into town that's moving into an existing building could say well great you get a PUD because of that. I don't think that's a really good trade off either. It's not necessarily something that the community, it's going to impact the community or make it a better place for them. Limited expansion preserves the existing trees. Once again in our ordinances we already have rules that state how we preserve existing trees and so once again that's not necessarily a benefit to our residents. That's a given. 74 .1 kv, i Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Creates additional jobs. 60 jobs? I mean we've turned down developments and applicants that have had maybe 200 or 300 jobs coming into town because of traffic and the size of their development coming in so once again I don't think that is a benefit to our residents and tourism generates and supports existing businesses. That's something we need to talk about as a community is do we want to be a tourist town? Yes we do have those people that are already in Chanhassen. We have the Arboretum. They're great neighbors. We have the Dinner Theater. They're great neighbors. Let's talk about this. Let's talk about the fact that we could be bringing in additional 600,000 people into our town. What is that impact on our community? I just think that all of these points for the PUD, it's not enough. I think we need to go back as a council, as a Planning Commission, as staff, as the applicant and work on these issues. Mayor Laufenburger: Anybody else? We have a motion to table the rezoning. Roger Knutson: Mayor just to be clear I assume that includes all the items on the recommended motion. Tabling. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yes all those items also. Roger Knutson: Site plan and everything else. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Tjornhom I think we are a tourist destination already. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I didn't deny that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Is there any further discussion? Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilwoman Ryan seconded that the City Council table the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, and Site Improvement Performance Agreement and Findings of Fact. Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion voted in favor. Councilman McDonald and Mayor Laufenburger voted in opposition. The motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Knutson, does that require only a simple majority? Roger Knutson: That's correct Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Is there any further discussion? Mr. Knutson is there, is there any further action that we need to take at this time? 75 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 4 4> Roger Knutson: You can discuss how you want to proceed but it's not necessary to do so. You could discuss whether you want to have work sessions. Whether you want to give more direction to staff to do certain things or set up meetings or. Mayor Laufenburger: Well I'll open it. Is there any further discussion that you'd like to have regarding guidance for city staff? Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Yes Mr. Mayor. Thank you. I would like to see a comprehensive plan. I would like to know how you're going to. Mayor Laufenburger: Wait a second. Councilman McDonald: I'm talking, okay I would like to see from the applicant a plan. A full blown plan that addresses a lot of the issues you've heard today. The fence. Pedestrians. How you're going to handle Prince fans that you know want to come and just pay homage to the site because I want to know what impact that's going to have upon the City. We've talked about Lake Ann. I've made my comments there. I'm concerned about Lake Ann during the summer because that is the premiere spot for the City and recreation so do we need to worry about Lake Ann as far as it's capacity to park cars? And again I want to know what's going to happen to the neighborhoods to the south on Audubon. Do we need to look at something down there? Do we need to look at lights? Stop signs. You know something down there if we're going to impact the residents more than what we currently do. So I think that's the City's part. The applicant's part is yeah, I'd like to know a little bit more about what you intend to do up on the site and how you're going to address those issues. Mayor Laufenburger: Any other council members want to make a comment or suggestion? Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: To echo what Councilman McDonald said, specifically I would like to see an expansion of the traffic study area. I heard tonight reference of first phase and second phase of the site improvements and I would like to see a plan where these site improvements can be done prior to opening. I would like to see some of the civil plans because in some of the context, a sidewalk couldn't be done because we needed approval from the watershed so I'd like to have a better understanding of what we need from the watershed to move, you know move these specific plans that put forth today but as well as the expansion of parking lots, et cetera so I'd like to have the civil plans to encompass more than just the sidewalk. And I think that's it so those are my, and then again back to the pedestrian safety plan. I'd like to see something very specific around that. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Anybody else? Councilwoman Tjornhom. 76 Chanhassen City Council — October 3, 2016 Councilwoman Tjornhom: I also would like to address, like you said the impact of having a major tourist attraction in our town. Can our infrastructure handle it? We've talked about using buses to come through and drive people back and forth. Where are those buses going to be picking people up from? Do we have agreements with those people at the park and rides for that type of arrangement? And also we've never really just discussed public safety because if you're going to bring that many people into town I am convinced that we will need more public safety for our residents and that's going to be an impact on our budget and that's going to be an impact on our residents and so this is not just about Paisley Park and a museum. It's about our community. It's about Chanhassen and preparing for the future. I mean we always talk about that that's what we do. We live here today and we plan for the future and I just want to make sure that when we are making those plans that we're wise and we do it right the first time. Mayor Laufenburger: Anybody else? Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: Mr. Mayor, so I'd second the comments from the other council members and request that the plan that comes back you know as we look at traffic in more detail, that the plan for installing the infrastructure you know that we have maybe a graduated plan for when the doors open to you know what level of traffic you would have in there until the various other milestones of the infrastructure such as moving the north entrance or adding sidewalks or you know the lane modifications, you know just a phased plan for how it will be implemented rather than yeah we'll just see how it goes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. You've, staff you've heard this? Okay. Is there a motion to adjourn? Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The special City Council meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opbeim 77 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 the rear lot coverage in the amount of 30 percent by 4.5 percent and allow a 15 -foot reduction in the wetland setback and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision. Aller: Having a motion by Commissioner Yusu£ Do I have a second? Madsen: Second. Aller: Commissioner Madsen seconds the motion. Any further discussion? Yusuf moved, Madsen seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the variance request to allow hard cover to exceed 25 percent by 8.14 percent, allow a detached accessory structure to exceed the rear lot coverage in the amount of 30 percent by 4.5 percent and allow a 15 -foot reduction in the wetland setback and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Aller: So the motion carries. The variance is denied. If you wish to appeal that variance you should do so in writing with the City and the follow up date on that matter before the City Council would again be October 10, 2016. Okay. PUBLIC HEARING: PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM — REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7801 AUDUBON ROAD FROM INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK (IOP) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IOP TO FACILITATE THE USE OF THE BUILDING AS A MUSEUM. Aanenson: Thank you Chair, members of the Planning Commission. This request is for a rezoning. There are some other things that go along with the rezoning but the legislative action is to rezone. The property is located at 7801 Audubon Road and the, as stated in the staff report the Bremer Trust is requesting through the special administration or the estate of Prince Roger Nelson to request a use for a museum. The location again is 7801 Audubon Road is located right off of Highway 5 and also access by Audubon Drive or excuse me Audubon Road which is also a collector street. In looking at the request the access again, two streets and that site is 9 acres and the building, existing building footprint is 46,150 square feet and I'll get in a little bit more detail on that in a minute. So the site is guided office industrial and that's what we're, that's the underlying zoning district that will be going with is also industrial. Everything around this property is industrial and this is taken from our land use map. The property shown with the star on it here, this is the property. The City's public works is just behind that property and so the request again for the museum is just for this subject site itself and it's just a rezoning at this time. In looking at the applicant's request for the site and how they see it being used, there's no interior remodeling at this time. I know I've given you emails and there's 3 more that I handed out tonight that will become part of the record. There were emails that were attached to that. Similar questions asked about why wasn't this treated like some other buildings we've done in 9 SCANNED Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 town. There's no site plan review. We're not looking at the architecture or anything but there are certain codes that will be required in order for this to open and I'll go through those again in a minute so again we're looking at the rezoning so included in your packet is the underlying IOP district. So whatever is silent on that is what you would be following for example the hard cover requirements and the like. So in this circumstance when we created the PUD we were specific on things that would be permitted and then some of the other standards for the PUD district and again I'll go through those in a minute too. So in the staff report itself we talk about what's the intent of the PUD district and does this meet the requirements and we have done that as a part of our analysis. Talking about the 5 -acre intent. Again it's similar to the other uses in the district as far as types of uses in the office industrial. So the existing building itself, as I stated there's no architectural changes to the building right now so this is how it will currently be accessed off Audubon Road so the Assistant City Engineer will be going through in a little bit more detail of the access and parking situation but that's one of the main drivers. So we look at this use itself, it's really a change in assembly and we do this all the time in the city. A business goes out. Another business goes in. It may change the type of occupancy, whether it's an office or to recreation or something like that so in this circumstance we're going from a recording studio to the use of an assembly occupancy, therefore architectural plans for the interior of the building are required and they are required through the City process. Building permit process to get approval based on those plans. That they meet all the building code requirements. They're in process working on that right now so again the action that you're looking at tonight, it's a legislative action, the zoning itself and how it will be used so that is going on separately but we've identified in the staff report those things that we are tracking and again to give them direction on the expectations as a part of being able to operate the museum. And again the main points on that were that we had talked about with the applicant is a perimeter fencing as a possibility around the site and we put that in the PUD because it would be opaque all the way around and that would help deter some of the walk up traffic so there's not the conflict with walk up traffic and people that wanted to look in. I didn't go through too much in exact, all the details of the business plan. Hours of operation. 'There was no limitations of hours of operation although they've identified hours of operation in their business plan. Again General Mills runs 24/7 but based on their operational plan it wouldn't be much past midnight and that would mostly be on the weekends. I think one of the other things that we are very pleased about and it has been practice out there, there's no alcohol. This isn't a nightclub. This is a museum so there's no alcohol permitted out there. Again in the office industrial district you are allowed to do a percentage of your retail building or there will be items for sale. Merchandise for sale. In addition, there will be snacks and beverages available too so those are included in the PUD so again everybody understands that's part of the operation. Again the intent under the PUD was also to provide some, as they have in the past which we have done a temporary use permit but we're trying to codify that and put it into the code so those would be placed, opportunities where they would have maybe special events. Again all interior. There's no outdoor activities with this so everything would be on the inside once a month doing concerts so again those would be permitted once a month. The only thing they would check with us if there's, letting us know the capacity who's going to be out there. That they're busing them in because that's what they've done in the past when there's not sufficient parking on the site so those would be monitored and 10 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 again that's typically done through letting us know, letting the fire department know. Our Fire Marshal know that they would be doing something like that and again there may be those occasions depending, and I'll let the operator talk a little bit more about this, where they might do some special events. Some business opportunities. School opportunities where they would do some special programming out there. Again all that would be inside. There's no outdoor activities and that's explicit in the PUD and again that's one of the reasons why we wanted to put it into a PUD so everybody understands the operational function of the building. I did put in here for your edification, I did put a copy of the PUD ordinance and I'll just take a minute to go through that just for everybody's benefit here too. So the intent is to create opportunity for a museum at this. Again it's a change in assembly which requires different architectural interior standards they would have to meet and one of the other things with that for the staff to sign off on is to meet the parking standards and again we'll go through that in more detail and so if there's not all the required parking then they would have to take measures to provide busing onto the site so they can accommodate parking on site so again the permitted uses would be the museum, recording studio. They had talked at one time potentially using this as a boutique hotel. Again that would require going through permitting on that because it would be interior remodeling. Again that would be something that we would just do administratively. Again the code allows minor changes. Up to 10 percent internally so we would just make sure that they have enough parking. That it would meet building codes. And then so then again putting 2 buildings on one lot. We talked about no more than 20 percent of the floor area being retail sales which again is in the underlying IOP district. And the prohibitive ones we talked about is the no outdoor events and again no liquor sale or consumption so I think that's again meets the intent of what, of how we saw this business being used. And then we talked about the parking and the different scenarios on that and I'll let the Assistant City Engineer go through those scenarios in a little bit more detail talking about there's kind of a menu of choices depending on how they get that put together by the end of, when they want to open and then throughout the year so again there's some additional permitting on that. I also included in your packet, if there was questions on the underlying industrial office district. Some of the uses that were permitted so the uses that are permitted right now are of greater depth and breadth of types of uses so we've narrowed that down under permitted uses but again the other parts of the district would still remain and that would be the lot size. The coverage. The 70 percent coverage. The height of the principal buildings. Again we don't anticipate any of those being changed and if a new building did request to go on the site, anything beyond that, anything beyond minor would come back for site plan review so again because there's been a lot of questions of why isn't this a site plan review. Because it's interior work except for the parking lot to accommodate that so anything beyond a minor change which I know they're trying to connect 2 parking lots but significantly beyond that they may need watershed district approval but because they would be a jurisdiction but other than that it would be internally with the City. So with that I'm going to tum it over to Alyson Fauske to go through the traffic issues. Aller: Great, thank you. 11 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Fauske: Thank you Kate. Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. It's my pleasure to go over some of the traffic concerns that were looked at when evaluating the site for the PUD. As noted in the and included in the staff report as an attachment to the staff report SRF provided a very extensive overview of the proposal and Matt Pacyna who put together the report is here this evening in case there are some specific questions to the traffic report that the Planning Commission or any members of the public may have. The first step in the analysis is taking a look at the anticipated operations of the site which the applicant provided to SRF which was a 65 guest per tour, tours departing every 10 minutes. From that they established an estimated total volume which is shown here on this slide for the existing and the build condition. In summary 80 percent of the traffic is proposed to come from the east on Highway 5 to the site with 5 percent coming from the west and then 15 percent coming from the south so they looked at the most, the highest use of the site to take a look at those trip generations. When looking at the proposed condition here on Audubon we do see a traffic increase of, the SRF counted about 4,400 vehicles per day which is in line with what the City has, the information the City has gathered throughout the years. We do traffic counts out here every 2 years as part of our cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Transportation so we do see that the existing condition is close to what staff has seen and then under the proposed condition that section of Audubon between Highway 5 and McGlynn Road would go up to about 7,800 trips per day. Out of the analysis SRF determined what, what's the peak time and by that it means what, at what point in the day would we expect to see the most vehicles on the site. The analysis concluded that a weekday p.m. trip would be a peak which is between 5:30 and, pardon me. 4:30 and 5:30 p.m. during the weekday and then the Saturday midday between 11:45 and 12:45 p.m. Out of that analysis again with the assumption of 65 guests per tour, tours departing every 10 minutes the SRF analysis identified 2 intersections where under existing conditions there was a concern. One is for traffic coming from the east so westbound Highway 5 traffic coming up to the signalized intersection at Audubon. The analysis showed there would be a potential queuing into Highway 5 under the current conditions and configuration of the street system so that was one intersection that was identified after the initial analysis. And then the second one was this northern access of the site that the queues for northbound Audubon would extend past this access and would block the access. So with that they took a look at some level of service improvements and pardon me. Looked at the level of services and wanted to see what type of improvements could be done to the site as well as external from the site to improve those intersections and alleviate the concerns that were identified in the staff report. So one of them is what's known as optimizing signal timing on Highway 5. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has been in contact with SRF regarding this site. They've indicated that there is a camera at this intersection. They're able to monitor that and would be able to adjust the signal timing based on what they're seeing out there for traffic and they were comfortable with what was shown both from the SRF analysis and what they can do based on what they're monitoring with their traffic cameras. The second recommendation was with regards to the northern access to the site. Currently the access is approximately 100 feet south of Highway 5. We would be looking to shift that so it would be about 220 feet south of Highway 5 and staff is also recommending that we would restrict this to a right out of the site just to provide some better traffic circulation and look at having this southern access off Audubon as the main entrance. That would be a hybrid of 12 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 what the SRF recommendation. They had 2 options that they presented and summarized on page 10 of the staff report so it's, what staff is recommending is a hybrid of the 2 options of the SRF report. One of the other recommendations that staff is recommending is restriping Audubon Road to include a left turn lane so that there would be a designated tum lane into the site and travelers would have an opportunity to queue on Audubon Road while allowing the thru traffic southbound on Audubon to pass by. The other thing that staff looked at and SRF report looked at was, and Kate had mentioned as well as the parking. With the SRF analysis the proposed or pardon me. The projected trips to the site were based on 65 guests per tour and 10 minute departures and when we look at making recommendations we wanted to take a step back and take a holistic look at it so that we weren't getting into the details of how many people per tour and how often they could depart and looked at it and made a simplistic recommendation that the tour sizes would be limited such that the on site parking would be able to accommodate guests that are arriving by vehicles. By passenger vehicles so that would allow if they wanted to do tour bus only. No guest parking on site they could do that. If they wanted to do a hybrid they could certainly do something like that and as Kate mentioned with her site plan it provides some options as far as what improvements they would like to do at the site and see how things start to operate before they make any site improvements. And as Kate also mentioned we took a look at the 4 scenarios which are outlined on page 12 to come up with that recommendation and that's also included in the PUD recommendations for the site. So in short the recommendations we took a look at either leaving the site as it is. We would restrict this northern access. 'There would be restriping on Audubon. If they make a connection between the north and south parking lot, we would again look to have this northern access restricted. Aanenson: Thank you Alyson. So with that I just want to point out in the PUD ordinance there is a menu of parking options depending on where they are and ultimately I know their goal is to be open this fall so not all the improvements may not be achieved by that time so there's different scenarios of how to manage those. Those are all built into the PUD ordinance as the Assistant City Engineer just went through so we feel comfortable that based on those choices that they can accommodate that based on what they get improved that staff is comfortable with those parking situations. So because of that we are recommending that you recommend to the City Council approving of the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and the adoption of the PUD ordinance and the attached Findings of Fact. I'd be happy to answer any questions you have and then obviously open the public hearing. Aller: Any questions of staff at this point? Randall: I do. Alyson I actually have a question for you. Was there any provision for signage at all to route traffic through different areas? So I'm thinking of someone driving on 212. They're headed out to Chan for the first time. Fauske: We've had some discussions with regards to having like for example the brown, the brown directional signs for a museum, for city hall, public buildings, that sort of thing. 13 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Randall: Okay. Fauske: That we would look at having some signage like that but nothing in great detail at this time. Randall: Okay. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So in conjunction with this request can we also consider some of the areas around there? For example, McGlynn Road and the parking and the people who go across Audubon and the safety of those people. Aanenson: What we looked at, that was one of the issues we brought up in the traffic study and maybe Matt would like to speak to it a little bit more but we did ask for that, one of our goals was to try to eliminate that walk up and the operator will talk about how they are selling tickets and how they're approaching getting people on the site to check so we don't have that. That was one of the reasons we encouraged the fence so we don't have the, it's less enticing to come up and try to look. If you don't have a ticket you can't get on the property so those are some of the things that to manage all that, that we're working with them on and I think by we're having that fence would help some of that, if that's your question. And also the goal is they have to be parking on their property. Not across the street unless they were to come back and get approval for a parking lot or something to the like. Madsen: Can the City consider no parking signs on McGlynn for people who just want to drive up and who cross Audubon just to look? Fauske: To establish a no parking zone requires City Council action. We haven't looked at that at this time due to, as Kate mentioned that there's certain site improvements and the operations of the site would not be conducive for walk up traffic. That's certainly something that we could take a look at in the future if we're still seeing high pedestrian counts. If we want to revisit that we could certainly include that in our analysis. Madsen: Okay. I also have a question about the proposed fence. Does the City in it's ordinances have sort of an upkeep and maintenance of fencing which would kind of outline how it would be maintained? Aanenson: That's correct. Yep. So the difference in this one, it is requesting it be opaque. That's why we put that in there because typically we have a transparency requirement. So yes there is a maintenance requirement for fencing. Madsen: Thank you. 14 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aller: Commissioner Randall did you have another question? Commissioner Tietz? Tietz: Yeah. Kate it's customary for plans, not just a narrative of a proposed activity be submitted by an applicant. It seems like what I'm hearing from Alyson and in reading the report the staff has essentially designed a traffic and parking plan for them. I think we should wait and see official plans from the applicant prior to approving anything. Aanenson: Well if you look at the traffic study, the traffic study does have the ultimate parking on there so. Tietz: I understand that but there's, you know there are alternatives to the access. There's alternatives to internal circulation. The staff has a position but we don't know if the applicant has a position. Have they accepted the responsibility to implement that? Aanenson: I'll let them address that. Tietz: Also on, why do we have hotels called out on the PUD? Aanenson: Because if you look at their business plan that's one thing they talked about with the silo building. Tietz: So we're accepting that? Aanenson: Correct. Tietz: But they also in your document that there will be tents in the northwest comer. How do you, how do you. Aanenson: We talked about that in the narrative. So the building code limits a tent to 180 days and so what we said is that, that we would ultimately like to see that a permanent structure. That would be somewhere off the kitchen if you were to go just sit on the premises and rest for a little bit that would be permitted. It's between the. Tietz: So the tents would be open during a concert event? Aanenson: It's one tent in this area right here. Tietz: Right. Aanenson: Yeah, yep. You saw that on their business plan drawing, correct. Tietz: Right. But that would be accessible during a performance event? That's an outside activity. is Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: Well there wouldn't be music out there. There would just be people out there, yeah. Tietz: That's the question. Aller: Any additional questions at this time? Okay, we'll hear from the applicant. If you could state your name and address for the record and your representational capacity, please. Pat Mazural: Thank you Mr. Chair and commissioners. My name is Pat Mazural, 9501 Virginia Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota and my role here is as a consultant with Bremer Trust and Bremer Trust of course is the applicant and the Special Administrator for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson. I'd like to say a few comments about, by way of background and our due diligence with the operator and answer questions that you might have including some that have already been asked. Mr. Nelson was an international celebrity. He sold over 100 million records. Received 7 Grammy awards, 1 Golden Globe and 1 Academy Award. Tragically on April 21' Prince passed away. He passed away herein Chanhassen at Paisley Park where he had created, recorded, often performed and welcomed renowned entertainment giants from all over the world. The purpose of a museum at Paisley Park is to preserve the legacy of an international celebrity. He was an extraordinary talent and a unique musical artist. He chose Chanhassen as his home and the people of Chanhassen as his neighbors. Paisley Park is a unique facility within the music industry because it represents all the work of one of the most recognized international artistic celebrities of our time. Bremer Trust with support and encouragement from members of his family has recognized that a museum at Paisley Park is the only appropriate location to commemorate the work and life of Prince. Chanhassen is where he built his legacy. Chanhassen is surely where he would want that legacy preserved. Preserving the legacy of Prince means doing it in a way that honors not only his extraordinary work and the extent of his work but also represents the neighbor that he was to this community. Bremer Trust has recognized that meeting that goal has required and will require the best, most experienced, creative, artistically sensitive and community sensitive of operators. The property closest in purpose and an operational logistics to this is Graceland in Memphis which commemorates Elvis Presley. Several of us, myself included went on tour of Graceland. We saw a very high level of traffic coordination. The use of shuttles. Timing of crowd tours. A very cordial welcoming of guests and the use of technology to make the tour experience pleasant. To make it educational and even to make it moving. All matters that were anticipated would be of the greatest importance to the family and to the estate but we have assumed would also be of great important to Chanhassen. Behind the scenes due diligence of the Graceland operation revealed a high level of thoughtfulness, logistical discipline and expertise in the coordination of operations. In their financial record keeping and reporting and the archiving of artifacts and attention to detail. Attention to the artist's brand and attention to the community impact. Great deal of communication, engagement and coordination has occurred between Graceland and the community. All are a priority there. We saw there an attraction that's a natural demonstration of the artist's life. It's not a contrived exhibition. From interviews and having spent significant time with the owner of Graceland Holdings, with personnel as well as the CEO and lead Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 executives of Graceland and witnessing the operators culture it's clear that our experience of excellence and diligence and community sensitivity will be replicated at Paisley Park. As this application has been processed with community development staff it's been gratifying to see that issues raised by city staff and by residents are the same issues that were anticipated and that Bremer looked to in it's due diligence, planning and questioning of the operator. Those are issues of hours of operation. Of vehicle traffic. Control of attendance and tour flow. Security. Community impact. They were all given ample consideration and questioned. Graceland has dealt well with all of these same issues and their many years of experience and forms and guides the response to those matters. Just briefly about community impact. Bremer Trust, LPark Management, LLC which is the managing operator that will manage Paisley Park if it is approved, and the family of Prince recognize that Chanhassen is a beautiful, well planned community with a lot of attraction to many outside of the city. You've got attraction in entertainment with your Chanhassen Dinner Theater. You've got attraction in sports with the adjacent Hazeltine Golf Course about to host the Ryder Cup and has hosted the PGA tournament and the US Open. You've got attraction for those enthusiasts of nature and art with your Arboretum. All has been planned and handled well for your community and brings people from well beyond the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The museum at Paisley Park proposes to be another well planned and well managed attraction and a good neighbor providing jobs for residents and bringing customers to your businesses. Since the application the operator has hosted a job fair at the Dinner Theater where over 600 applicants appeared. Many are now employed in archiving and otherwise preparing the facility. The operator has engaged local suppliers for property improvement and will engage others for food, transportation and necessary services. There are other places where this could be done. There have been requests to locate the museum and actually to relocate Paisley Park to other locations, even outside of the United States where Prince remains a celebrity. But Chanhassen has been Prince's chosen home for 30 years and with this commemoration of his legacy we request that you let it remain his home so thank you much for your consideration. I can answer some questions but I want you to also be introduced to several here. Several individuals who have had significant roles in this proposal and they're here to let you know their commitment to making this museum a valued asset of Chanhassen and if there are any questions that I'm unable to answer there certainly will be someone here who can answer them for you. We have here Todd Phelps who's an attorney with Stinson Leonard Street in Minneapolis. He's engaged in real estate and land use practice. We have Jill Radloff, also an attorney with Stinson Leonard Street who has been engaged in the contract negotiations with Graceland Holdings. We have Craig Ordall who is the President of Bremer Trust. Joel Weinshanker who is the majority owner of Graceland Holdings LLC and that is the organization which will wholly own PPark Management LLC. He's the operator who stands behind the success of this project. We also have Regina Gamble. Regina is the Vice President of Operations and General Manager for Elvis Presley Enterprises. She's here from Graceland and of course has worked closely with Joel Weinshanker and with Graceland Holdings in the operation of Graceland. So again thank you for your time. Aller: Thank you. Any questions at this point? Hearing none, okay. 17 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: Mr. Chair I'd like to go back to answer Mr. Tietz's question because I'm not sure I understood it. Or didn't answer it correctly. You asked me about parking. When they provide additional parking, yes. They're required to provide civil plans and the like for a parking expansion. What we're saying right now, it can be operational if they accommodate it using buses and alternatives. Right now there are large events handled on special, under a special events permit where they bus people in and that's how it's accommodated so yes. When they expand the parking lot they will have to go through a civil, private civil plans. Go through the watershed district. Review all our requirements. They're adjacent to a creek. To meet all those standards and they're aware of that. Tietz: Well I understand that Kate. My concern is that some of the issues that were identified in the SRF study, and that Alyson presented to us, if they're not implemented in a timely manner we will have serious traffic issues at that intersection and one of it's moving the north access point down and restricting the lanes and potentially if, on Highway 5 if the queuing isn't satisfactory and if they can't control it with signalization there may have to be an expansion of the queuing lanes so there's a lot of issues that I didn't see a timeline established with them that I think are really critical to the success of the project. And if I'm traveling from far away and I can't get to the site because traffic is a concern or if I have to ride a bus you know 15 miles, like we have to get to the Ryder Cup, that's going to be a potential problem and I think the circulation internal to the site, we need to see a plan that they commit to and have a time schedule to implement. That's all I'm asking. Aanenson: And that's part of what we stated in order for them to get occupancy, parking is tied to that. There has to be a defined parking plan. How they're going to operation it for us to give, again that's the internal part of getting a Certificate of Occupancy that they can meet those requirements. Tietz: But is that 2 months? 6 months? 8 months? 12 months? When would it be implemented? Aanenson: Well they're working on all those right now. Tietz: Okay. Aanenson: Yes, Tietz: But none of it would be in place by October 3rd Aanenson: I believe most of them will, yes. The striping yes. That's, correct me if I'm wrong. Tietz: The north access point is going to be moved and repaving connecting the parking lots internally? You know I don't want to be a nuisance here but I think there's a lot of issues that. 18 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: Yep, the watershed district has given approval. Tietz: And most of it is safety and security of folks arriving and of the neighbors and of the community. It's a great asset to the community, don't get me wrong. I think we just want to be sure that we do it properly so it's successful. Aanenson: Correct and I concur with that. That's the issues we raised and we've been in discussion with them and they want to have a good experience because if it's not it's not going to be successful and we want to have a safe community so we both have the same goal. Tietz: Good. Aanenson: So I think we're both marching down this path to get to that point. Tietz: Thank you. Pat Mazural: And commissioners if I may add to that. There are several scenarios contained in the staff report which have been very helpful to understand what's needed out there to make this a pleasant experience for not only those who are attending but those others in the neighborhood and as I look at the various scenarios essentially one of those is a scenario 3 which includes the, essentially the driveway between the north and south parking lots. That will be completed by opening day so that will be done as community development staff has represented. The striping is in process. The other piece of this is that the entrance that is nearest to Highway 5 will be, the north entrance, will be an exit only entrance. It will not be moved by the time of opening but that's something that could occur later. It will be right only and that, understand that that driveway between north and south is what allows that to happen. It's sort of a loop. I believe the only piece of this, and I want to make sure we have this clear is that one part of scenario 3 includes sidewalks installed to accommodate foot traffic and that may come later? Aanenson: Yeah that was, that was eliminated from part of the PUD ordinance because that will come later, correct. And that way we'll see the civils on and do that but ultimately you want some internal walking sidewalks too. Pat Mazural: So there is a plan that's been informed by the study and with wonderful input and talking to the city staff. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So as I understand it scenario 3 should be basically ready by opening day, except for the items that you just referred to and so the parking lot will not be expanded by that time so will you be making the tour size smaller or will you be busing certain people in? How will you accommodate that? 19 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Pat Mazural: The operator is committed to bus where needed to maintain the conditions within the parking lot so we don't over park. And also parking on heavy days will in all likelihood be a hybrid of buses and parking anyway where during that maximum, those peak times those that are on what's been termed the VIP tour may be parking on site but others will be bused. Shuttle bused. Madsen: So when people purchase their tickets will they know if they get parking with it or will they go and drive around the parking until a spot becomes available? Pat Mazural: There will be no tickets sold on site so everyone will have their tickets in advance. They'll know where it is. The tickets if they're sold on site will include the parking fee to park on site and there will be parking monitors out there so that people are arriving within a prescribed time of their tour and not filling the lot except during the time that they're touring. Madsen: Okay. And if I may I have a question about the parking monitors. The business plan indicates that the attendants will immediately review the parking tickets to confirm that it's okay for the vehicle to be there but if they do that immediately upon entering the parking lot, won't that cause a back-up of traffic on Audubon? Pat Mazural: Actually with the sufficient number of parking monitors and with this lane I was talking about, the traffic will be circulating from the south entrance to the north entrance so it will keep it moving. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Pat Mazural: Yeah. Aller: Any additional questions at this time? Okay, thank you. Pat Mazural: Thank you. Aller: Did we want to hear from the traffic analyst first? But for. Aanenson: Unless there's questions. He's here to listen... Aller: Okay so I think what we'll do then is we'll open up the public hearing so the analyst can hear the questions and comments and perhaps address them at that time. Great. So at this point we'll open up the public hearing portion of this item. It's an opportunity for those present to speak either for or against this presentation and the application or make comment upon it. So if you'd like to come up and make a comment you would come to the podium. State your name and address for the record and then proceed. Welcome. 20 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Shirley McGee: Welcome. Thank you. My name is Shirley McGee and I'm a resident of Chanhassen at 1950 Andrew Court which is close proximity to Paisley Park. Got a couple of concerns. One is about, did they give consideration to inspecting the cars or if that's going to be one of the issues because I noticed throughout the time when they had affairs there, the traffic would jam because they're going under the cars and they're inspecting them for security reasons so has that been introduced into the plan of coming off of 5 or how is that going to work? Aller: I think what we can do to try to keep this moving is, if you tell me that you'll address that then we'll go ahead and address that when. Shirley McGee: Okay, and I'll give you my other question. Aller: Absolutely. Shirley McGee: Can this be a museum without being rezoned? That was one of my main questions because I have a serious problem with the hoteling part. If they're going to build a hotel like they did at Graceland I'm not in favor of it. That part. Aller: Great, well make sure that that gets answered for you. Shirley McGee: Thanks. Aller: Any other individuals wishing to come forward? Welcome. Lynne Etling: Hi, Lynne Eding and I live a couple blocks from Paisley Palace, 7681 Century Boulevard and I'll just keep mine brief. The major concerns that I have obviously are the traffic and the pedestrian traffic but the one thing that's not clear to me is the parking lot is not, the additional parking lot is not going to be done beforehand right and if you're going to be inspecting cars before they actually enter the parking lot, that's one question. Where are they going to go and the biggest question I have is, how are they going to know if they're going to be bused in or driven in and therefore where are all these buses going to park? That's a bigger question. Aller: Thank you. Lynne Etling: You're welcome. Aller: Welcome. Wendy O'Connor: Hi. My name's Wendy O'Connor and I live at 1702 Valley Ridge Trail North. I've talked a bit with Kate and submitted quite a few things just because I live very close by and I'm concerned about a number of things and I'd like to go through those briefly. Number one. Who will be the management? We keep talking about the management. The organizer. 21 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 The whomever but, and I know that people from Graceland are here. People from Elvis Presley Enterprises are here but who is it? Who is the person that we can go to? Anyone? Is it you? You'll be on site? Okay. And so you. Joel Weinshanker: I'm the management partner of Graceland Holdings. I've been here many, many days. I'll continue to be here many, many days. Anyone can reach out to me. My email is Joel&Graceland.co so you can contact me directly. Wendy O'Connor: Okay so my question with that is, so. Aller: Ma'am, why don't you just go ahead and address us and we'll get them answered. Wendy O'Connor: Sorry. So my question with that is, so Graceland Holdings, I get it. You know it's Elvis and everything for Elvis but through my research I noted that Elvis Presley Enterprises was sold and then CKX bought it and then Apollo Global Management so how does Elvis Presley Enterprises and Graceland flow with that? Aller: Okay we're going to get those answered. Wendy O'Connor: Okay I just think that's a big deal. Aller: I think that's a good inquiry. Wendy O'Connor: Just because this Apollo Global Management is a privately held company. It's an investment company and you know it's not Graceland you know as we all imagine in our mind what Graceland is. So with that, nice to know who I can go to. So the McGlynn Road part which I had addressed in one of my emails to Kate. In the traffic study it said that it wasn't necessary to review McGlynn Road and so I went out on a Saturday myself and counted cars. I counted people and through that I counted over 600 pedestrians crossing illegally on Audubon Road in a 2 -hour period. Just 2 hours so I know that it would be more than that and frankly I went out there thinking I'd find 30, 40. It was nonstop. I actually couldn't believe that it was that many so, and again as someone who drives past there every day, back and forth, you know I see people. I see cars stop all the time. I definitely documented it and it's probably in your packet of cars pulling over in the crosswalk. Sitting there. Causing traffic. Uber pick-up. I mean there's going to be that. Is there a plan to get Uber cars? How are they going to do that? Where are they going to pull? The sidewalk's not going to be there and it's not going to be ready in time. Where will foot traffic go? Will there be foot traffic? I don't know. You know from my opinion right now the people that I spoke to out on the street that day they're just, they want to see what's going on. They are not there because they want to see inside. Some are for sure but most people just were driving past heading home from somewhere and they want to see. They want to see what Paisley Park is so my concern is that you're still going to get the traffic driving past. You're going to have the foot traffic. We're going to have a problem. We'll have an accident and who will be holding the bag? It will be the City of Chanhassen so my WA Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 recommendation as a solution would be to install a HAWK. I was speaking to a Streets Minnesota gentleman and trying to make it very safe for pedestrians. It's the High Intensity Activated Crosswalk beacon so it's similar to what we have on 101 by IWCO. I mean if safety's a concern, if we're going to have it I don't think that we want to wait until something bad happens. What is the rush? Finally, I'm almost done. So the hours. The hours are a concern to me because 9:00 to 9:00. 12 hours a day is I think a bit much. Besides the fact that the peak traffic time is 4:30 to 5:30. So if you were to actually change the hours to the hours of Graceland, because Graceland has hours of 9:00 to 5:00. If we had the hours of Graceland, you could eliminate the complete peak traffic activity. It would be done because you wouldn't have people coming at 4:30 because a tour is an hour. Or it's 60 minutes so you would completely eliminate it. There'd be no reason to keep that 9:00 to 9:00 or have that extra concern about traffic and concern about people trying to get home on 5 and concern about the traffic signals. The parking standards, I'm sorry I have one more thing. So talking about the holding traffic as they wait, I'm just curious where, we don't know where those people will go so how will when they get, when they bring their ticket in and they're supposed to check in at say let's say 2:00 but they get there at 1:30. Where do they go? So they flip around and they just drive around until it's time to go or they park in front and queue up in front of Paisley Park. I think that that's a real concern because if there's what, 6 or 300 extra trips you know that's a lot of cars. That's a lot of cars waiting so, and I think if they don't have the accommodations for it there's no need to open right away. Why wouldn't we do that? Why would we let them open so with that I think that you know and we just saw the presentation for the people with the pool and with setting the precedence to have everything right. They have been working on this they said since May. Trying to get it all correct. We've been hearing about this since August. August 13' to be exact and again it's this big rush to get it done. Let's get this done by October 6' because they want to open. Why don't we have it right the first time? Why don't we make sure it's right? It's all buttoned up. All our ducks are in a row before it opens. You cannot un -ring that bell. It's only going to be closed 2 days a year and then you're going to have construction on a parking. You're going to have construction on 5. You know all these other things. I just think it's irresponsible for us as a city to let them open right now without having everything on that list done. Aller: Thank you. Welcome. Ann Miller: Thank you. Hello, my name is Ann Miller. I live at 6561 Fox Path in Chanhassen and I've been here for 25 years so Prince beat me by 5. It has been a pleasure being here and watching Prince's studio and his home that used to be over off Galpin and we would frequently walk and bike by both places and look at them so please don't build a fence where we can't see it. I was thinking of museums on my way here. The Minneapolis Institute of Arts. The Walker Arts Center. The Russian Art Museum. They're all in neighborhoods. There are no fences. You can see everything. Prince would want us to see everything. Don't block it off. And when I go to see his museum I'm going to walk over to see it and so this is a walkable, bikeable city. We have wonderful paths, et cetera and it's just a wonderful opportunity for us but let's make it an opportunity and we have a walking bridge over. I wrote Kate an email about it. Over the Highway 5 that's not utilized very well right now and I think it could be moved down to the 23 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 other part of 101 and/or Powers Boulevard so that the people who park maybe a school bus in town can use those businesses and then when it's their time to take the tour they can walk over that bridge and take the tour. I think the other thing that, the mistake that or something that needs to be remedied maybe is off of 212 there's no on or off ramps for Audubon. The only on and off ramps are at Powers and 101 so you could alleviate some of the traffic issue if you had an on/off ramp at 212 on Audubon. And the other thing is education. School buses will be coming too and if you think of the school buses lined up at the Institute of Arts or the Walker Arts Center that does happen and those places I think even have a smaller areas for parking so it can be done and there could be off site parking in other places in the city so please don't take away from the walking and bicycling senior citizen like me. 'Thanks. Aller: Thank you. Any additional comments from the audience. Gary O'Toole: Yeah, Gary O'Toole, 8418 Burlwood Drive. Aller: Welcome. GaryO'Toole: My compliments to staff. I went through your presentation. I think it's pretty good. Didn't really have a question until Ms. Madsen mentioned traffic and queuing and I'm thinking right down the road we have the Arboretum and I'm sure there are other members here. They have a long driveway. They have lots of monitoring. There's lots of queuing. I don't see that it goes away unless somehow the site can absorb traffic that comes in so that they can absorb it. I'm happy to hear we're talking with a traffic specialist but I think we right in our back yard have a very specific situation at the Arboretum that I just don't see with the traffic how this is going to be alleviated but you've got good people working on it. Aller: Thank you. Tim McNeill: We're Shamus and Tim McNeill. We live just south of Paisley Park at Valley Ridge Trail and Audubon and we're mostly concerned about the excess traffic north and south bound that's going to come our way because as it is it's a 45 miles an hour zone and the hill crests as it gets up to Valley Ridge Trail North and it's a really hard intersection for, especially kids but even adults to manage with the speed of the cars especially headed northbound. It's just really difficult and we'd like to be included in some of the plans to make sure that the kids and other neighbors are safe. Aller: So which one is Shamus and which one is Tim? Tim McNeill: I'm Tim. Aller: So Shamus you've been out there biking and walking around? Shamus McNeill: Yes I have. 24 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aller: And what do you think about the traffic? Shamus McNeill: It's very busy and dangerous. Aller: Do you think, what do you think about the possibility that there will be a Prince museum? Do you like the idea or not like the idea? Shamus McNeill: I like the idea but I think we should wait until it's been more thought out. Aller: Okay, thank you. Tim McNeill: Thank you very much. Aller: Welcome. Joy Gorra: Good evening. Joy Gorra, 1680 West 78h Street and I guess I have some concerns if this is really successful what kind of expansion do you have in mind in the future. Do you plan on going over your borders and building something elsewhere? A lot of people have come up to me and wanted to know if there was going to be a Purple Rain Amusement Park so just throwing that out there. But maybe it was mentioned earlier and I missed it but I know a lot of you in, who live here in Chanhassen are aware of the first Saturday of each month at the motor complex park and that traffic is just wild for you know those first couple hours so hopefully you're going to take in mind scheduling on that first Monday. First Saturday, excuse me. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Elizabeth Kressler: Hi, good evening. Elizabeth Kressler, 1750 Valley Ridge Trail North and I actually had a couple of questions and comments with regards to the tent that has to come down after 180 days. That to me depicts that there's something outside going on even though there's no music, it depicts an outside event which is not in the plan so I'm not comfortable with the tent hanging out for that period of time. I am in agreement with Shamus and his dad with regards to crossing at Audubon into what we call the bird neighborhood. I am an avid walker. I walk anywhere from 4:00 in the morning to 9:00 at night and even our lovely community service officers do not stop at a crosswalk when I'm in it and that is a huge issue. I think I brought that up originally when we were widening Audubon and it was my concern and I actually suggested that we slow the speed limit down to 30. However, it's apparently not allowed so I'm really concerned about the upkeep of traffic because when the traffic starts to get jammed on Highway 5, those people are going to find another way. I know I would. I am all about not sitting in traffic. They're going to come right up Audubon. They're going to come flying up Audubon to get to Paisley Park because they have a tour and they've got to be on time and that's the way it's going to be and it's going to be really sad for our residents, for somebody like Shamus trying to cross over to see his friends. The other thing is, is the opaque fence. Should it go up which I am ANI Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 not in favor of. Will it be 6 feet or 8 feet? And so that was not addressed. As well as it was addressed, when do you address the McGlynn parking? And when I came here I left my house at 6:30 and I counted 25 people hanging out at the fence. 6:30 at night. They're not home. They're not at a sporting event. They're at 6:30 at night at Paisley Park and I avoid that intersection at all costs because already it's a nightmare. I constantly stop for people. I know I'm going to get rear ended for being a good resident and letting people cross because it's not a crosswalk so there's a lot of things that have to be done to alleviate the concerns and do it right. We make laws and rules to keep us safe and you are going to set a precedent for other people to come in and disregard those laws because you let Prince do it and you can't do that. It's not fair. It's not fair to the people that live here so I need you guys to listen to us. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Any additional comments or questions? Welcome. Melanie Mertes: Hi, I'm Melanie Mertes and I live on 8671 Flamingo Drive so the traffic on Audubon and Powers and 5 directly does impact my neighborhood and myself. My two concerns that I have is you know the purpose of a planning committee and city council is to preserve the quality of life for our residents here at Chanhassen and so we just ask that we do our due diligence before rushing into opening anything. My concerns are the traffic analysis. They're saying 15 percent would be going onto Audubon. Without signage that we had talked about people are going to use Google maps. They're not going to go according to a plan that we think looks right. Google maps from Highway 12 takes you up Audubon. That's going to bring, that's our back yards. It's people's neighborhoods. It's residential crossing. It's crossing to get to our schools and that was a reason why our neighborhood in the first place was bused rather than walking because of the existing traffic on Audubon was not safe to cross to get to our schools. We are bused in our neighborhood and we are less than a mile away. So the limited signage requirements. Google maps is going to take you on Audubon. It's also, I felt that the traffic analysis was very limited in it's scope. It didn't go down to what's going to happen to our non -signaled intersection by our school at Lyman and Audubon? That's where our teenagers drive to get to school. There's a left hand turn off of Audubon to get towards Highway 12 without any type of a signaled intersection. Those are the streets around 3:00 in the afternoon that our high schoolers are taking home. And so that was a concern is just the really limited intersections that this analysis seemed to take in. And my other concern are the hours of operation. They say 9:00 to 9:00 but if you go online the last tour begins at 9:00 so we're really extending the hours of operation from 8:30 when people come until about 10:30 at night when the VIP tours end. Many of the businesses around there are 8:00 to 5:00 Monday through Friday so now we are taking heavier traffic on all of those roads into the weekend. You know we talked about our attractions of the PGA tour. We're closing our schools to accommodate traffic. We talk about the Arboretum. If you go there during a plant sale, Highway 5 is backed up forever to get in there so we already do have existing traffic concerns in our area that aren't addressed so I'm very concerned about the number of people coming in. Then also the current tickets are on sale and it does say that parking is included so for saying we're not ready for it and we're busing people, how are all of these people from across the country going to know that they shouldn't be showing up on Arboretum. On Audubon. And then my other question is, in the study with 26 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Graceland is what has the impact been to any neighborhoods nearby? Has it brought increased value to neighborhoods that now the traffic is going through and the back yards that are getting affected by it? And so before we open anything I think we just really take our time and see what our traffic issues are and also hours of operation and I just propose if we do something like Graceland, closing at 5:00. That's just going to give 4 hours, those 4 hours are going to give back to our city of Chanhassen. The reasons why we moved here. And one thing that I just have to, I'm a runner and I run these paths and these roads every day and right now as it is, the bike path that runs in front of Paisley Park that goes underneath 5 so that's supposed to be our safe crossing to Highway 5 is next to impossible to get to when you're on the east side. Or the west side of 5. You're already crossing turning lanes so people are trying to merge onto a 55 miles an hour and I'm trying to get to a bike path so that I can go underneath 5 safely. You can't do it now so I'm not sure with all of those turning in there how that's going to be addressed so that our bikers can cross 5 safely and walkers and runners and the people who live here. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Any additional questions? Comments. Concerns. Welcome. Denise Choiniere: 'Thank you. My name is Denise Choiniere and I live on 8481 Bittern Court and that's one of the bird named neighborhoods that Elizabeth referred to. A couple things. One of the things that I noticed in the traffic study is that the traffic study was done before school started so I'm a little concerned that those numbers are going to be artificially low because you don't have any of the extra transportation with students and parents transporting students. I echo a lot of the concerns that the other neighbors in our neighborhood have expressed. I too am concerned about the hours. I would even prefer it closed at 4:00 so that we have the evening and aren't worried about all of that traffic. By the time the tours are done it's 5:00-5:30 and then it does feel like the same neighborhood we have now and that Prince wanted to be in. Prince biked and walked around and did all the same things that we do and I think he would want our community to stay that way so thank you. Aller: Thank you. Okay anyone else? I think just about everybody here has had their shot. Alright we're going to close the public hearing at this point in time. And then we'll return and put Mr. Pacyna on the hot seat if we could. And I hope you were taking great notes. Matt Pacyna: My name is Matt Pacyna with SRF Consulting. I'm a Senior Associate Traffic Engineer there. Appreciate the opportunity to be here this evening. I hope I took good notes. I'll see what I can do. I know some of the questions I would defer to some of the management staff but as far as, I'm just going to go, kind of run down the line here and some are duplicates so as far as the car inspections, different things of that nature, that's really a management and how they're going to operate that. From a traffic operations perspective, we looked at you know really utilizing that south access point. That provides you most amount of storage on site to be able to manage that internal queue as well as the restriping of Audubon Road. What that does is that actually does allow for some extra queuing space on Audubon if there is some queuing that happens from the internal site operations and so that was taken into account. They'll talk a little bit more about how they manage to ingress/egress relatively quickly. As far as let's say if 27 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 someone enters too early, that was another question as far as the access point. With how they probably would be expected to manage that as well as the north access being an exit only. They would be able to reroute those vehicles to get them out of the site but at the same time if they'd be able to manage that where if there was available parking and they knew, they know how many tour staff or guests that they're going to have, there's available parking they can let them in and park. So it's really an on site management type of situation with how that internal operation works for that check in point. Another question that was brought up was with respect to McGlynn Road. I think the city staff had talked a little bit about some of the parking management strategies. Whether restriction. Things of that nature as well as the pedestrian access that's going there. The management staff, as they mentioned, they're not planning any walk up ticket sales so they're doing their part to manage that. Now there is the residents and just the overall people that come to just see the site from afar. That's happening today and so is there a better way to manage that today? There is the possibility yes through signage. Limiting parking on McGlynn. You know even if it's temporary signage they go up to cross at Audubon at Highway 5 where the signal is. I know there was some mention of that being a challenge as well so there's different strategies that can be implemented with respect to pedestrian safety. There was a mention of a HAWK signal. There's other techniques such as RRFB's which are Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. Those are also very effective from a pedestrian crossing perspective and so I think that would just be something that would continue to need to be monitored and determined if that's the appropriate mitigation that would be warranted. I think there just needs to be a little more dialogue through city staff in that regard. The next question that I had on here is with respect to, really gets along the lines of Audubon Road and traffic volumes there. Where vehicles are destined or where they come from and access the site, that's probably one of the most subjective things that as traffic engineers that we do. So we take into account you know where we expect, you know where your population centers are as well as you know how routes or what routes you could take depending on where you're coming from so whether you're coming down from Mankato. How is Google maps going to route you? You know those are type of things that we look at when we develop that distribution for where traffic is going to come from. Some of the things that we can do to manage that is, you can actually work with Google maps and the other map sites to change your routing for your specific address. So if somebody puts in the address for 7801 Audubon, you can tell Google that I would like them to be routed on Highway 5 and so that when, when a resident types in that address into Google it will actually pull up Highway 5 as their route. So that's something that can be accommodated to manage and kind of limit the impacts on Audubon. We did mention the north access point would be converted to a right out only so that would be directing exiting vehicles to go north to Highway 5 so that would also reduce our impacts on Audubon Road as much as we can. There's another question as far as with respect to the auto complex. We did provide some supplemental data collection on one of their event days with respect to how those volumes change on Audubon Road and so that was considered. Looking at the peak and how those volumes change. It's not necessarily an intersection operations perspective. Yes, is it an increase in traffic? Absolutely but does it break the intersections down from a level of service perspective, we did not see that from our operations analysis. Other questions, there was some additional information about crossing further south on Audubon. I'm not going to cover that. OU. Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 That's you know we talked about the traffic volumes on Audubon and what the site's doing to limit additional impacts further to the south so I'm not going to cover that aspect of when we were, as part of this, the working with city staff we were, they provided the intersections that they wanted us to evaluate and so that's what we were scoped to do. Other than that I think the only other, the last comment was when the timing of the study and the counts with respect to when school was in session or not in session. We collected in late August. School was not in session yet at that time for all of the districts in the area. Some were but with, looking at the data that we did collect as well as the supplemental data that we collected along Audubon for the auto complex which was, was once school, it's a Saturday condition but isn't a school necessarily but we looked at MnDOT provides their average daily traffic volumes that they annualize throughout the year, throughout the area and that data that we collected was actually very consistent with those annualized averages and so we feel pretty confident that the data that we collected represents a conservative or a good condition. Aller: Okay. Matt Pacyna: I think that's everything that I had. Feel free to chime in or if you had one more or anything else. I kind of lumped a few together there. Audience: (Inaudible) Aller: So was that addressed? In the analysis the pedestrian crossings. MattPacyna: We did look at pedestrian crossings. Right now the pedestrian crossing at Highway 5 and Audubon, that is a signalized intersection so pedestrians would be crossing during you know a walk indication which is typically a safe condition. If they're not walking during that walk condition, then that's enforcement type of issue. I do recognize that yes there are motorists that come up on northbound on Audubon and they're not necessarily thinking about pedestrians being there and I think that comes down to you know is it a signage. Watch for pedestrians. Is there something else that could be done from that perspective to notify motorists that there, watch for pedestrians in that location. You know from a crossing perspective a signalized location is a good crossing from a pedestrian perspective. Aller: Any additional questions regarding traffic at this point? Audience: (Inaudible). Aller: So with regard to buses and busing, is there sufficient parking on site? And if not on site at another location? Matt Pacyna: That would come down to a management perspective. We didn't look at busing operations from a traffic and parking perspective at this time. You know typically school events are off peak periods so it would generally be lower type of attendance. Time periods when for 29 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 other tour guests so there may be sufficient parking at those times. Otherwise I would defer to the management and how they would propose to deal with their buses in that situation. Aller: Is there a difference in the type of calculation that you do or the results of calculations if we replace cars with buses? Matt Pacyna: So our analysis what we looked at from a parking perspective was really kind of a worst case condition as far as we didn't assume any reductions or anybody coming from a shuttle perspective. We looked at it as okay if there were 65 tour guests for that every 10 minutes and everybody was coming from their car at their typical vehicle occupancy and so we looked at it from that perspective so all our operations analysis looked at it from a relatively conservative perspective. Aller: Okay, thank you. Anything else? Yusuf Can I ask a question? Aller: Absolutely. Yusuf Actually I'll ask Kate first. Aller: Commissioner Yusuf. Yusuf Is it an option to do a repeat study you know maybe a couple weeks into this when this is, when this kind of takes effect? I only ask because we've done the simulation and we have these predictions but I share a lot of concerns much like everyone else about the traffic condition and the foot traffic that's going to be in the area so I'm very concerned that we have the study based on simulation. When things start, when we start selling tickets and people start showing up is it an option to do a repeat study to either validate your results or just maybe bring about some more concerns or possible additions or corrections? Aanenson: I'll let Alyson Fauske answer that question. Fauske: Thank you. That's an excellent question Commissioner Yusuf and one of the things that I believe the applicant would be better able to answer the question is contracting with law enforcement during those opening times when they anticipate higher than, you know we're at the maximum capacity for their tours. We certainly do have an opportunity to monitor the situation but as far as requiring additional traffic analysis upon opening that is not something that we have discussed at this time. Aanenson: I will say something. Yusuf That is something that I would like to push for if I can. 30 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: We did put in the PUD contract, there is a level of service requirement in the PUD and so it talks about, if you look at the ordinance. Fauske: Kate if I may. We discussed a level of service in the staff report. We did not include a level of service requirement, minimum requirement threshold in the PUD requirements as when we take a look at that to go and say that the level of service decreased to be directly attributed to the site in perpetuity in the PUD, we weren't comfortable with that recommendation. We had some discussions about that. Taking a look at that certainly after the opening but 10 years down the road if the level of service at any of those intersections were to fall below to go and link it specifically to this property, staff didn't feel that that was an appropriate recommendation in the PUD ordinance. Aanenson: That's separate from going back and measuring it again. I think the level of service issue was there's not all those properties are not developed at this time and in 10 years it'd be hard to say that, to attribute all the changes in the intersection based on this use so we would look at that differently level of service as opposed to going back and studying again to say how it's functioning. Yusuf: Okay. Can I say one more thing please? I like when you mentioned about the preferential routing on Google maps. I have never heard of that before. It sounds like a good option. You mentioned a lot of nice things and I just don't know about the implementation of it so yes that's an option but who's going to do it or who's going to look into all the different navigation options to try to do that preferential routing? Matt Pacyna: That's a fair question. I would defer that question to the management. Aller: Awesome, thank you sir. Would the applicant like to discuss some of the leftover issues? And we can start off with Commissioner Yusuf s last question which is basically now that we have the traffic study how are we intending to implement the traffic based upon the survey that we have? Pat Mazural: Yeah obviously it's the hope and intent of the operator of the estate and of the family that this be a good experience not only for those on the tour and for fans of Prince but for the neighborhood as well so I can't, I don't want to speak for the operator but I'll look at him and say certainly there will be ongoing assessment. Joel Weinshanker: And specifically to your question so Graceland actually was able to. Aller: So why don't we have you come on up. That'd be great and state your name and address for the record. 31 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Joel Weinshanker: I'm Joel Weinshanker. I'm the managing partner of Graceland and Graceland Holdings LLC. Graceland was actually able to, through Google maps change the avenues in which people came so we've actually done that successfully with Google to date. To address a couple of the other concerns. So and some of the neighbors because I think Prince was a great neighbor. We're actually using you know assuming this is approved at this time, not to be at full bore but actually to work up to it. We've arranged with Southwest Transit, which is only 1.8 miles away to have spots during peak times so what we're actually going to be close. Every person who ordered a ricket ordered it online through email so we have direct access to each one of those people so we can communicate to those people. To the talking about having an extra traffic on Audubon, the road which will exist before October 3rd from the south to the north will be able to handle over 20 cars so there will be no checking of anything before people come off Audubon onto the property and then we're going to have 3 to 4 times as many parking attendants as we feel would be necessary in a normal circumstance to make sure that there is never ever a back up. Dealing with the buses, during peak days and just so everyone understands we only anticipate 5 peak days during the first 6 months of operation so we don't even think we're going to come within 50 percent of what the traffic survey thinks is a reasonable amount of traffic outside of those 5 days. On those 5 days we are going to have 2 buses that are never parked that are actually going to be doing the continuous you know basically from the Southwest Transit through, coming into Graceland and at any peak time during those days only VIP people are able to park there so you go down from 65 guests per 10 minutes to 15 guests per 10 minutes which is an average of 6 cars per 10 minutes so you're looking at an average of 36 cars per hour so it's less than I 'h cars you know per, for every 2 minutes. So those people, you know all of the people who are in the regular tours are going to be bused in. Those buses are never going to be sitting there but with that traffic, with only 36 cars per hour we're always going to have a third of the main parking lot empty so that would be if people come early. If people come late. We don't have a 2.7 percent gap with no difference from the one before because I was listening. We have a 30 percent gap. We have 2 buses during peak times that will be coming in and out. They will never be parked so. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So you mentioned you will be using the Southwest Transit parking ramp. Joel Weinshanker: Yes. Madsen: In the business report it mentioned shuttles from Mall of America. Possibly the airport. So are there all of those or you just, has it changed? Joel Weinshanker: So I think it more long term from Mall of America and the airport because as we understand it there's issues with what can and can't be done between public and private transit so as we were told because Chanhassen opted out of public transportation and obviously I'm telling, you know infinitely more than I do about this. That eventually with the town's permission we would like to be doing that. The Mall of America would love us to be doing that. 32 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 To be honest with you they've offered us all these incentives because they would love people to park there so that they can purchase there but currently and again we're looking at 5 days maximum in the first 6 months where this is going to happen but we've already secured spaces there for this endeavor. Aller: So I'm going to ask the question that's on everybody's mind. What 5 days? Joel Weinshanker: So the ones that exist right now are October a and 8a', the opening day and the first Saturday. October 14a' which is the day after the tribute show and October 151h . I've given you 5 just as... Aller: Okay thank you. Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: And in the packet there is a proposed bus route. There are actually 2 of them and one of them goes along Highway 5 and another goes down Lyman and then up Audubon through a residential area where some of these people live who are concerned with traffic. Can we, will you have a chosen bus route for these buses? Joel Weinshanker: I can't imagine it wouldn't be from Southwest Transit and again you know your neighborhoods a little bit better than I do. I can't imagine it wouldn't be Route 5 and another thing because I'm just as concerned about the local impact to people who live off Audubon. Prince has amazing fans. These aren't you know, these are fans that are articulate. They're educated. 'They're really the best fans. If we send the messaging out, and again we have the email address of every single person who's bought and said please don't travel on Audubon, they won't. They just en masse these are amazingly wonderful fans and I'm one of them but they really, you know if we say this is what you need to do to be a good neighbors and Prince would want you to be a good neighbor... they will. You know and it's very frankly it's been our experience, someone asked about housing values. If you do a Trulia or Zillow search at Graceland the housing values within a 5 -mile area are greatest bordering Graceland so the closer you are to Graceland you can do a Zillow or Trulia search, the closer you are to Graceland the more the homes are worth and we have the lowest crime rate in the city of Memphis. Madsen: Okay then I have a follow up question. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So, and I've been to Graceland. I had the pleasure to visit there and they have a very large parking lot which is off site from the actual Graceland where people can go and walk through exhibit areas and then you have your ticket and you queue up for a shuttle bus for your assigned time. Are there any plans similar to that here? Joel Weinshanker: I think there are contemplations of doing that. You know we don't know, we know that there are a great many Prince fans in the world who want to see Paisley Park but we 33 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 need to, you know we're walking before we're running. We're not selling, Prince fans in the world who want to see Paisley Park but we need to, you know we're walking before we're running. We're not selling, you know we're capping tickets far below. The survey was done at a, what is the most of the most of the most that could ever be sold on a given day but I can tell you on an average Wednesday, especially in the first 3 to 4 months we're going to be looking at 7 or 8 cars an hour. We're not looking at you know, we're not going to be looking at you know, for the maximum that they've put for an hour we're going to have less visitors during the week except for something like the day after the tribute show. We're going to have less visitors per day than the calculations were made per hour. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Pat Mazural: If I could just, I'm sorry. Aller: Commissioner one second. Tietz: Well I was just going to ask a question about what's left on your list to update your certificate of occupancy and when will that work be completed? Todd Phelps: Mr. Chair, members of the commission. We have retained an architectural firm who we anticipate preparing our, has prepared and is delivering a report this week certifying that there are no code violations. Building code violations or that there are some minimal things. We think that there are some hand rails that need to be added in certain locations but we've been advised that there's nothing significant in the report that would preclude the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Tietz: But the City has yet to sign off on that correct? Todd Phelps: Correct. The. Tietz: It's just in process. Todd Phelps: If there was an approval it would be subject to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Tietz: Were there Kate. Aanenson: Yes. Tietz: Were there issues with life safety and sprinklers and exiting? Aanenson: No, the Fire Marshal has been through. 34 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Tietz: And toilets. Aanenson: Yep, the Fire Marshal has been up there several times just checking on things. Getting the status, right. Opening is predicated on that architectural report and our building officials going through the building as well as the Fire Marshal and signing that document before it can open, yeah. Tietz: Okay. I assumed that that would occur but I just want to check. Aller: Commissioner Weick did you have a question? Weick: I did not. Aller: Okay. Pat Mazural: Mr. Chair and commissioners if I could add one thing to one of the questions that was asked. Aller: Please. Pat Mazural: And that relates to the management of the site. Mr. Weinshanker was very gracious in giving everyone here and on television his cell number. Aller: And email address. Even better. Pat Mazural: Email address but we do, Paisley Park will have an on site manager as well who is a local person and the search for that person is underway right now. There's a temporary manager there but there will be someone responsible for the property here in Chanhassen at all times. Aller: One of the questions that was asked was there an intent to have, if a wall is required that it would be 6 or 8 feet or opaque or not opaque but what are the intentions with the wall? Pat Mazural: Yeah that was an interesting series of questions and certainly appreciate the comments of Ms. Miller and others about the beauty of the site and wanting to keep it visitor. Actually the wall and the intention to put an opaque wall there really addresses some of the other issues that have been raised which relates to pedestrians and also not just opaque but a wall on which there, it would not be easy to hang things and so it would significantly cut down, hopefully eliminate the kind of foot traffic that we see around there so that the traffic that's in will be for those on the tour with pre -purchased tickets. Aller: Thank you. 35 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Tietz: That's currently part of the aesthetic of the site. Pat Mazural: Excuse me. I'm sorry I missed the comment. Tietz: No that's, you know the fence and the materials on the fence from day one that's, in my mind that's been kind of aesthetic of the site and it enhances that experience because it personalizes the opportunity to remember Prince. Pat Mazural: It does and in fact you know the memorial that it represents and the love for Prince is part of the tour and the show of love from his fans and residents here around the community. I was informed too that the intention is that it be an 8 -foot fence. Can't be jumped very easily. Tietz: Is that code? Aanenson: It does and I think you're seeing the two positions on this. People pull over on Highway 5 right now and that's a nuisance so it's a challenge is how do you stop that so and maybe it's temporary until people get used to just so they can't see something so we're just trying to internally, we put it in there. The opaque fence because that's normally not standard. The city code allows them to go to 8 feet. We'd like it not to have one. I think the other thing, we do get nuisance complaints regarding stuff that's on the fence. Maybe blowing. Some people appreciate it. Some people don't so I think we're still trying to figure that out. It all comes back to safety and it's not just people walking, it's people pulling over on Highway 5. Parking and getting out so we're just trying to solve that between both parties. Weick: Can I comment on that because I was going to save it for later but I would, I would challenge that logic. If our primary concern is pedestrian safety the material of the fence I don't think would increase or decrease the pedestrian activity outside the building so if it's an opaque wall, and I've seen Graceland a lot, it now becomes a different type of canvas. You don't hang things. You write things. Okay and it now becomes, probably an awesome graffiti wall. I think it'd be beautiful but you still have pedestrians that are going to stop and do that and so if there are security concerns for like people jumping into Prince's property or something I get that but I would put on the record that the material of the fence I don't really believe would change the pedestrian activity. I'm not worried about cars and parking. I mean it would be awesome if you had the kind of parking issues that we've talked about here today and all day long, that means that thing is wildly successful and I think that's fantastic for the city. I don't think that's necessarily going to be the issue. I'm concerned about the pedestrian and so we talk about the fence. I'm concerned that we're fooling ourselves into thinking putting an 8 -foot opaque wall is going to reduce people from wanting to walk up on that property. Aanenson: ...there's other ways to do it including landscaping. Some vegetation. Weick: Yeah. 36 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: And you know again for us when you see cars pulled over on Highway 5 that are not in the travel lane. When there's semi's coming down, it's a concern. And not only for that with pedestrians but as long as people want to continue to walk and you've got people coming in, we're just trying to figure out how that all comingles and maybe there's appropriate places for screening. We can certainly work with the applicant on that. Aller: Great. Thank you. Additional questions? Comments. Aanenson: I just had one other thing Mrs. Gorra brought up regarding the amusement park and maybe if you want to go back up and talk about the hotel was just talked about in this one site here is my understanding was the building that's already in place. Any other new buildings that would come on have to come through site plan review. Any, you know again we're not talking about new buildings. Across the street is still zoned industrial office park. I've included that in the packet. There is not amusement as a permitted use in that zoning district so we've never talked about an amusement park at this point or anything like that so any change like that would have to come back through for another amendment to the code or another public hearing or something like that so right we're just talking about this parcel and any changes beyond that we haven't put amusement park as a permitted use on this property so I just wanted to make that clear. Aller: So in the end analysis here what, what are they asking for that couldn't be done under the current code? Aanenson: If you, well can you ask that again. Aller: In other words they can operate a business now. Aanenson: Correct. Aller: To what extent can they go under the zoning the way I'm reading it they can go 9:00 to 12:00 instead of 9:00 to 9:00. What things are they asking for in the PUD process that we're exchanging here? We're giving them the right to do something they wouldn't already the ability to do. Aanenson: Correct. Well if you're looking what's the underlying IOP zoning district doesn't have hours of limitations right now so. So other than that. Aller: I mean he's had events there before. He would go through the process. Aanenson: Correct. Yeah we've had permits. Aller: They would have to go through that process if they wanted. 37 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: We've had significant number of people out there that they've managed through busing so we're used to that. Those typically were in evening hours, overnight hours til early morning so we've, the City's managed those before so. Aller: And the reason I say that is that, I'm looking at this that it's a business. They can operate their business and as a City if we're going to give them a PUD and we're going to fine tune this, the whole reason for a PUD is to gain some benefit and so I think the traffic analysis that's being done and the questions concerning traffic and pedestrian safety are really the issues that we need to get something back and so that's what I'm looking for but as far as the zoning itself, I'm looking at it's a, or if we allow this to move forward we're doing something. We can have progress at this site but the traffic problems, the pedestrian problems that we're facing there are there today and we really need to look at those regardless. So I guess I'm moving this forward to comments from the commissioners on their feelings on the application. Tietz: One more question for Kate? Aller: Sure. Tietz: The $20,000 escrow account, what would that cover and who's going to judge whether they don't comply? And then how do you collect it? Aanenson: I'll let Alyson answer that question. Fauske: That's a great question Commissioner Tietz. As we looked through the analysis and what we were looking for with regards to required improvements we looked at having a financial security in order to insure that the site was operated as it was intended. That the parking situation was put in as intended so typically what we do in that case is we have through this process we have an agreement with the development team. Between the development team and the City. We have the money either in escrow which means a cash submitted to the City and put into an account that can only be taken for those purposes or a letter of credit from a bank so that's, when we looked at that we holistically said, and that's something that we typically do with sites that undergo site improvements is we typically do collect an escrow to insure that it's being done. Tietz: But on a site like this where it's traffic and it's a number of things. It's not like a big residential development where there's a lot of public works and infrastructure installed. How did you determine or how did the City determine it was only $20,000? That seems like a pretty minimal amount on a major project of this sort. Fauske: When we start looking at that, we looked at it from a standpoint of the parking improvements. If there was parking or a connections for example of the time of writing the staff report you know the connection between the north and the south parking lot, I was unsure of the status of that and now they've indicated that they're going to do that so it was a financial security 38 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 to insure that the onsite parking is there. What I'm hearing from the Planning Commission is that perhaps we want to take a look at the traffic and insuring that the site operates within the parameters or the predictions of the traffic study and we could certainly take a look and talk to the management team and take a look at perhaps instead of having a level of service in perpetuity that within 6 months we take a look at the level of service of some of these intersections and see if that's operating as we anticipated based on the improvements installed. So we could certainly if the Planning Commission would like to take a look at doing something like that and forwarding that recommendation to council staff and the applicant can certainly go back and have that discussion and provide a recommendation based on what the Planning Commission discusses. Tietz: Yeah I think that'd be prudent Alyson, thank you. Aller: Does anybody disagree with that? So we'd make that request right now. Audience: Can I get my question answered? Aller: I'm sorry ma'am, what other question were they? Audience: The question that I asked was, why is it being rezoned? What are they asking for? Aller: That's what we were, that's exactly what my question was as well. Audience: I heard you but I didn't get the answer. Aller: I suppose we want some clarification on why it's being rezoned. I understand that they had, at least at minimum for the simple reason that the City does not have museum in the zoning saying that they can have a museum. So that would be the first and foremost reason. Additional reasons would be the potential for someone to stay on the property as a hotel. Or other uses. Am I correct in that? Aanenson: That's correct. Audience: So when they're, if they do the. Aanenson: Mr. Chair can you ask them to come up to the microphone so we can. Aller: Yeah come on up to the podium and state your name and address, especially I don't think you were up here before so one of the only ones left. Jim Wagle: Jim Wagle, 8411 Egret Court. Aller: Welcome. 39 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Jim Wagle: And I'm just wondering with traffic and everything and then I wasn't even thinking of having a hotel or motel or whatever on site and that, what does that do as far as how many people? You know number of clients coming into the buildings, all that kind of stuff. What is that going to throw into the mix as far as traffic control? Taking away space there for parking. 1 guess that's kind of what my question is on that. Aller: Great, thank you. And again I'll go to my understanding and then but if they were to do that they would have to come back and ask for, certainly if they were going to put up or add to the buildings, then they would have to come back before us and get a site approval. Aanenson: Correct unless it was just the existing silo building, then they would get a building permit. They'd still have to show parking. Then we would still factor that into the equation of how much and going back to what Ms. Fauske was just talking about. Checking on the level of service and making sure we're still within that range but the intent right now is just looking at the existing building on site. Aller: Right and if it also, if they were even to use that as a place of occupancy for anyone then we would be looking at other regulations that would have to be complied with in order for them to have a certificate of occupancy for a human being to stay on the property. Aanenson: Correct, yep. All building codes, correct. Otherwise if that was to come down and some other smaller building, that would have to come back through site plan review just like any other application. There'd be a public hearing. We'd look at the architecture. All of that. If it was anything different than the existing building there, it'd be our same normal process. Aller: Based on any of the questions we asked any other last questions? So we're back to the conversation that we're having. What does everybody think or does someone want to make a motion? Madsen: I would like us to consider to designate a bus route on Highway 5 to be included in that so that, to stay out of the residential area of Audubon. And I would also like the City to consider making some safety improvements related to the McGlynn area. Whether they limit parking. Add a crosswalk. I'm not sure what the solution is but I think it needs some safety improvements. Aller: Any other comments or. Tietz: Well I guess I just wish we would have had more time at this. I know things have happened very, very rapidly but the first 5 biggest events of the year are going to happen within the next 30 days and we're barely into understanding how this is all going to come together and how the traffic analysis is going to work. There's a lot of I hope it works right now and the statistics that, and I trust SRF. I know those guys. I worked with them for many, many years but 40 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 I think you know it's conjecture and based upon their studies and I think that there's a potential for some pretty significant issues for our public safety folks over the next 30 days. If those are the 5 busiest days of the year, I just wish we could slow the process down and have more time. They could have more time and implement a lot of the plan before they open up. Aller: Comment. Commissioner Randall. Randall: Is it possible that they could get a conditional use permit to cover October to see how it goes? Aanenson: No. Randall: Okay I just thought. Aanenson: We don't have a conditional use. It has to be in the zoning district so a conditional use would serve with the property so then, if you want add anything else Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: As zoned it's, a museum is not a conditional use permit in this district so no. Aller: Right. Yusuf. I do want to say I do like that the tickets have to be pre -purchased so that gives you an idea that you know how much volume to expect so I think it's going to give us a level of comfort knowing that you'll be monitoring that going forward. Knowing that you'll keep track of how much volume to expect and then we can marry that up with the traffic studies and see how things are flowing would really help the City make the right choices here. Audience: Could I ask how far in advance can they buy? Could they buy like an hour before online? Aller: Tbat's a good question but why don't you come up to the podium so that people at home can hear you. I`ll repeat the question which is how far in advance can you purchase a ticket online. Joel Weinshanker: So during down times it will be several hours before but we're actually shutting down ticket sales days before once we hit certain times and we're actually shutting down hour by hour. If I can show you on my laptop I've checked ticket sales a dozen times today and we've actually moved around hourly so even a day where we might not be very busy but you know if too many people are buying in one hour we're shutting down. If you look at it, if you go back to the site where you see every 10 minutes we've actually moved the general tours from every 10 minutes to every 30 minutes in a lot of instances so we're doing minute by minute. We're even actually shortening the hours on some days where we don't find it necessary so what we've been able to do with this exercise and what the City Council and the mayor really 41 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 understood is we're trying to figure out how to be the best neighbor so by putting tickets on sale we've actually been able to see when the interest is. We've been shortening hours on some days. We've been taking times out so if too many people are buying one type of tour we'll shut down the other type because we don't want as many people and on the busiest day I think we had 65 for 10 minutes which would be 390 per hour. On the busiest day we don't anywhere close to that. On opening day there's not close to 390 people in any hour even though we felt the building could handle it. With buses could handle it. We're walking before we can run. Audience: So why ... return on investment? Joel Weinshanker: We are limiting hours. Audience: No I mean to... Joel Weinshanker: Because when Graceland at times was, first of all Graceland doesn't close at 5:00 so a comparison wasn't fair. Audience: (Inaudible). Joel Weinshanker: No, no. The last tour. Aller: Direct all your comments to me. Joel Weinshanker: Okay. So Graceland doesn't close at 5:00. The last tour starts at 5:00 and they close 2 '/2 hours later into the, you know into across the street where people are buying merchandise but at times and many times over the year they've had night time events and are open to 7:00. It's really about the fan. There's a different fan. There's a, you know obviously the fans are older at Graceland so what we're trying to do is to accommodate the people who actually love Prince. We're trying to be open hours without being open at midnight. Without being open at 2:00 a.m. Someone who would live close by through email had questioned the level of volume because they said sometimes when Prince had shows in the middle of the night they could hear from 10 blocks away. I don't know if that person's here who sent that email. The museum is going to be a museum. I mean very frankly if something's loud I'm putting ear plugs in, there's going to be nothing that anyone's going to need to put ear plugs in the building never mind 7:00 or 8:00. Aller: And just to extend the set hours now are going to be 9:00 to 9:00 so the last tour would start at 9:00. Joel Weinshanker: The last tour will start at 9:00 on certain days but we've already on weekdays we've already shorten it til 7:00 p.m. so those were really weekends and possibly opening day and the day after the concert is opening day so just on a few special days we've actually shorten the hours on weekdays to 7:00. To start at 7:00. 42 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aller: And then while I've got you up there another question came back to me and that was regarding the tent and the use of the tent. What type of functions and use of the tent would be? Joel Weinshanker: Just simply so, the only thing that the tent is being used for is Prince's chef is preparing a tasting plate of Prince's favorite food that will be offered in the tent and then it's the same place where you can buy a tour book or a t -shirt. Those are the only uses for the tent. And we're doing it because we didn't, we're trying to change the building as little as possible because Prince had a real intent he wanted it a certain way. He laid it out for tours. He already had tested bringing some people in because he loved it and he really wanted it and we have videos and we have directions via email on what he wanted to do so the test was necessitated because there is no area in there that was really for that. Aller: Thank you. Lynne Eding: May I ask another question please? Aller: Okay, why don't you come on forward and ask it to me. I'm going to. Lynne Etling: Lynne Etling again and it's directed to Joel. Aller: Direct it to me because I don't want to have. Lynne Etling: Okay direct it to you. Aller: Thank you. Lynne Etling: Well when he was talking about his website one thing that is, well a big question in my mind is it sounds like his website is not engineered to say okay at this hour set number of people are allowed to buy tickets. At this hour set number of people allowed to buy tickets and so forth so there's no way for him to control automatically how many people buy tickets for a certain day. Certain time. Do you know what I mean? Aller: I understand the implication of what you're stating. Lynne Etling: And so that has to be manually managed by him is what I'm gathering. Aller: Okay so. Lynne Ethng: Because you're saying you're going in and moving around times. Aller: So your question is regarding the management of. 43 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Lynne Etling: Yes. Aller: Will they be cutting off these tours appropriately. Lynne Etling: Right and I guess it all falls back to is you know it seems to me like you know they paid $1,054 and most of the work here has been done by the City of Chanhassen because we you know, it's a very small business plan. There's not much that's been given to us to even review and you know maybe I'm just not understanding what he's saying but yeah it's a concern because what happens if someone doesn't manage it for a few hours? You know what happens? Aller: Great, thank you. Lynne Etling: You're welcome. Aller: Okay so we're going to cut off public comment at this point or we'll be having a continuous conversation. Not that it's not a good thing. One of the best things about Chanbassen is that as neighbors we come forward and I try to run these meetings so that there is a conversation instead of holding people's feet to the fire on time or but I do prefer that all the comments are directed to us as a commission rather than to individuals to avoid any heated communication so let's get back to our conversation amongst ourselves. Roger Knutson: Excuse me Chairman, do you want to close that public hearing? Aller: So the public hearing is closed. It was outside of the normal customary procedure. It had been closed and we just had a side bar. So back to the conversation. We've been talking about additional potential desires as far as conditions. Any other comments or is anybody flat out against it or? Yusuf: No I really like what you proposed, the addition you proposed. I think that's going to capture a lot of what we were looking for. I think that's going to help alleviate much of the concerns that people have so I would really appreciate sneaking that in there. Weick: I've been relatively quiet. Aller: For a change. Weick: I know, isn't that weird? You know everything that everyone has is I think very valid and you know the concerns. It does feel rushed. I mean it has to feel rushed right? It's opening soon if everything goes through so._ I'm in mostly in agreement with everything. That we need to be, we need to be careful and work overtime on this one to make sure that everything goes off well. I am personally, you know part of our responsibility is not only to the immediate community around Paisley Park but also to the City of Chanhassen. I sat in a local restaurant a few weeks ago and you know listened to groups of people that were coming in. They were from IV Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Texas and they were from Oklahoma and they were in town for the, there were some tribute shows or something. I have to admit I'm not really a Prince fan, if you can believe it but you know they were in town. They were going to those shows. They were staying in Chanhassen and they went to Paisley Park right to see it and look at it and everything like that and for sure they would go to the museum but they were staying and dining and buying coffee and shopping and those are the kind of things that I hope we don't lose sight of that something like this brings to the city of Chanhassen as well. It does not, I'm not diminishing anything that's been said here tonight for the very real concerns about traffic and pedestrians. Those are real and we have to make sure that those are handled properly but there is also a side of this that makes the city of Chanhassen an incredible destination and an opportunity for commerce outside of Paisley Park I think that we have long needed so I'm excited about that. Aller: Any additional comments? At any time anyone can make a motion. I just can't do it. Weick: I'll make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Weick: Is it as simple as the one that's stated here or do I have to add? Aller: I would add. Add the conditions to their request. Aanenson: Can I get an interpretation from the City Attorney? We're not adding conditions. We're just forwarding recommendations to the City Council, is that correct Roger? Roger Knutson: Yes. Their recommendation can be anything they want it to be. They're changing the ordinance, the draft in front of you or what have you, it's a recommendation. Aanenson: Right, okay so it would be a recommendation to the PUD if you wanted to put some of those in, that's why I'm asking. Weick: I'm not the right person to, because I'm not really aware of what all those recommendations would be I'll be honest. Fauske: Chairman Aller? Aller: Yes. Fauske: Just as a point of clarification for staff and also when you're considering your motion, when looking at the updated traffic study if you would like, I heard both pedestrian and vehicular traffic analyzed so I'm very clear on that but if the commission could please provide some clarification on all intersections. If it is your desire to relook, re-evaluate all intersections or just the 2 intersections that were identified as a point of concern within the traffic study. 45 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aller: In my mind the easy thing to do would be to say all. Yusuf I would agree. Tietz: But how far is all? Aller: Well the ones that were, with the understanding that McGinty is included in that. I mean. Yusuf: McGlynn. Tietz: The immediate, not as far south as Lyman? Aller: No. I don't think in my mind, I think that's far enough away that there wouldn't be an impact but if you think differently. Tietz: No I think it's just those folks who potentially Googled it and came off of 212 then that's an impact because they come down Powers to Lyman and Lyman to Audubon and then shoot up Audubon and that's probably minimal. My greatest concern is still the queuing on 5 and those left turns. You know we mentioned, someone mentioned the situation at the Arboretum. I mean that's horrendous when they have their plant sale in May trying to even go down Highway 5 from downtown Chanhassen it's backed up. I can't imagine what's going to happen at the Ryder Cup with Highway 41 and 5 but. Aller: But those are specific events too. Tietz: Well those are significant events yeah but you know this is going to be a significant destination as Steve pointed out. Weick: I agree. Tietz: Yeah so we just have to be really cautious and monitor it closely and if there's impacts we have to back up and take a second look at it and take another swing at it and those improvements could be costly and I don't know who bears the cost of those road improvements. You know we have a state highway and we have, is Audubon a city? That's not county right? Fauske: It's a county road that. Tietz: Is that county on Audubon? Anyhow there could be significant highway improvements that have to occur based upon a 6 month run time or a 12 month run time and I think we have to be prepared to deal with that and someone has to bear the responsibility. 46 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Yusuf. I think a good place to start is the traffic study. The follow up study and then we can go from there. Aller: But we're looking at directing them and how far that study should go. Yusuf: I would recommend the immediate intersections because whatever traffic we're concerned about on Lyman is eventually funneling down to this Paisley Park so if you're studying that immediate area you should capture that too. Aller: So if I'm understanding you want to go to Lyman? Yusuf: No. I'm saying just do the immediate intersections around Paisley Park. Madsen: I would like it to extend as far south on Audubon so we would know if we need to add a HAWK signal so that pedestrians can safely cross Audubon in the residential area. I'm not sure how far south. Audience: Osprey is where one of the two crosswalks... Madsen: Just as long as it includes all of those. Tietz: What's the cross street at the auto Motorplex there that comes off of, it goes between. Because that comes from Powers all the way over to Audubon so if people got off on Powers they could short cut if the traffic on 5 is bad they could short cut and come in the back way so. Maybe we should just say, Alyson maybe we should just say that to be determined after 6 or 8 months. Confirm the location of the intersections to be studied otherwise we're going to talk about this all night. Madsen: Yeah, agreed. Aller: So Commissioner Weick, you're going to make the basic motion and then we'll add, with the additions that we just outlined to Alyson. Weick: Okay. Madsen: Well Nancy had a couple points though before didn't you? Yeah. Weick: I don't have knowledge about... Tietz: Just with them. Aller: Start with the basic. 47 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: You can make a motion and then make an amendment. Weick: Thank you. I'm going to make a motion. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and adoption of the attached PUD ordinance and Findings of Fact. Randall: Second. Aller: We have a motion and a second and then I have, so we're open for discussion and then I have some friendly amendments which will be brought forth by Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So one would be, the one that we have already discussed with the transportation study to determine the level of service at, I don't know what the time increments are. If it was 6 months or 1 year. And then also to consider to designate a bus route on Highway 5. And also to consider developing a safety plan related to McGlynn and that intersection. Right away. Tietz: Could we include something about timing of the implementation of the approved option for completion of the internal site work? So there's, you know it sounds like we can get some work done before October Oh. It's just the connection of the two lots but we've got other recommendations to move the access point and then additional on site parking and expanding the on site parking and some other site improvements which may require you know storm water and so forth but I'd like to see a timeframe if the applicant is willing. Is that something, you know June of depending upon weather. Is it summer of '17 if the work is complete? Or is that dependent upon the success of the project? Aller: I would do it dependent on the, to coincide with the traffic study so you're looking at the whole ball of wax at the same time. Tietz: That's one way of doing that. Aller: Because. Tietz: An artificial timeframe doesn't, yeah. Aller: Yeah so I would. Tietz: So the implementation would follow the completion of the subsequent traffic analysis and a timeframe for implementation. Something like that. Aller: And you accept that as an addition to your friendly amendments? And you'll accept that as a, all these amendments to your motion? EF Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Weick: Noted. Weick moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and adoption of the attached PUD ordinance and Findings of Fact with the following recommendations for City Council to consider: 1. Review the transportation plan. 2. Consider a bus only route on Highway 5. 3. Have a pedestrian safety plan. 4. Have a time frame for completion of improvements. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Aller: Okay we're good to take a 5 -minute recess here to allow the room to clear out. For people to take a break. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Yusuf noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated September 6, 2016 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aanenson: The only thing I have right there is consideration for Chick-fil-A who applied for a Carver County CDA grant. Just the cost of the stormwater treatment. Soil corrections to help give them some relief so we'll hopefully be getting that up to the County this week. I'm not sure we had any other, we haven't had much going forward because we tried to fast track a couple things there so that's it. I just want to talk a minute on the future agendas. We don't have anything on the regular agenda in 2 weeks but what we are trying to get together is a potential, have the Riley -Purgatory watershed district come and give you a presentation so that's a potential. I'll let you know. Terry Jeffery is working on that and then on the 180i we're doing some code amendments and then we still are planning on Avienda, the lifestyle center so I think there might be a couple people here on that one too. Yeah and that's again concept review so with that one we are going to just have. Aller: There's no Findings of Fact and its just recommendations. Aanenson: Correct, give them direction. Traffic study and the like yeah so I think just on another note, there's 2 property owners across the street that could potentially be for sale so we've talked about it internally. We're getting a lot of requests. The staff is to talk to people because they're going to be going out for bid, we want to make sure we're giving everybody the same piece of information so we probably want to do an AUAR to look at both large properties C] Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 together. I'm talking on the north side of Highway 5 and then include park recommendations. Vegetation. Forestry issues. Improvements that may be acquired along Galpin Boulevard. Impacts to West 78'b Street. Access points. Those sort of things so we're giving that to developers to all have the same information so we want to be very consistent in our messaging on that so, especially if they're going out to bid and say oh I didn't know that would be an issue so we're hoping to get that put together here in the next month because there's people working actively on some of those properties and we want to make sure we have the same message so that's all I have. If anybody else has anything. Aller: Anyone else? Randall: What happened with the water treatment plant? Aanenson: That is going to the City Council on the 26b. Randall: The 26`s, okay. Aller: Alright, well I'll entertain a motion to adjourn then. Commissioner Yusuf moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nana Opheim 50 4 ti a / . Sf r` GRIP' a. o NPIL � 6.Sr W 4-401 1} O61L4£ ,vl'P6n(,K 3-4w5 (i LF /N6EF O p.N RNi� ca�r0 Dha�IM1P-N Wlw ��r`t N.IQ nYve. 3-5'w ® Lr1TLF Cie. y L� LIR`eN�6Ko OFFe LIF"1 J- Irw '�-�i'1+ X L.�LE �cuiSTs"' 6v -K55 �Qfa £.rl.e5° Ptl Dse.ellrYiP t i } r hTT 1��2 fl{LVIN x ° �o c Tv SLE 'I 7e01 h10u9xw p cH#W*IAer, ( I sc^te l?a2S r CEIVED AP 1 1 2017 OF CHANHASSVo� 9 b0 � h I�yl $�' M PddM Bead iM Rh TUY id ©i lW dflY�NdaVo ®OvfMT��^r o -*� s- wLe- ® Ilrm� 9�Gsry O e�wew.r 4 C-4 L ,. Y O(/emr�llb �' YfY aD Owed. O � • uws.r.s. x... NRD Lardsccpe SW rn:,r�e, Avg, Suite 230 Mrrietorka, FN 55345 Pisley Park 78q ALdofwn Rd �� rN M1r rrm .. usn e 10 -PR -16-46 STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF CARVER FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT PROBATE DIVISION Case Type: Special Administration In the Matter of: Court File No. 10 -PR -I6— 6 Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson. - - AFFIDAVIT OF ALISON A. ILSGCK Decedent. and Tvka Nelson Petitioner. Alison A. Hauck, being first duly sworn upon oath. deposes and says as follows: 1. 1 am over the age of 18 years and comPtant to testify regarding the facts and matters stared herein. which are based on my personal knowledge. 2. 1 am a trust officer for Bremer Trust National Asso6ati0n, the Cour-appointed Special Administrator of the Fstate of Prince Rogers Nelson specializing in trust and etta;eadminin-ation. 3. 1 make this affldaAt in support of the Specie! Administrator's request for advance approval :o list and sell various real estate holdings of Ne Estate for zl least ninety percent (SO%) of the appraised fair market salue. 4. 1 have been employed by Bremer since October. 2006. My services involve all aspects of carate administration, with a specialty in managing all aspens of residenthi: and commercial properties, including but not limited to completing annual inspections and reviews preparing leases, incerviewing appraisers ordering appraisals, arranging for property 1 COaE"JW9t15 ��a}:lalef�61a3 Filed in First Judicial District Court 8/9/2016 2:54:57 PM Carver County, MN lulls -1.101M. manag==L bill paymenL remittances and receipts, reviming closing documents, and compliance c4gemert including farm:and and nri:reral, oil and gas aura. 5. 1 and others employed by the Special Administrator have participated in due diligence regarding the inspection, appraisal of and potential sale of certain real estate holdings ofthe Estate. 6. The properties that the Special Administrator is currently anticipalingwill besold, and the appraised value of same, are listed in spreadsheet attached as Exhibit A. 7. 1 and others employed by the Special Administrator, in coordination with its attorneys at Stinson Leomrd Street LLP, initizted an RFP process for interviewing and selecting potential real estate 22ert0bmkers to list, market and eventually sell certain properties owned by the Estate. REDACTED 2 cow:;mus.eore mn�aw+ Filed in First Judicial District Court 8/9/2016 2:54:57 PM Carver County, MN Filed in First Judicial District Court 8/9/2016 2:54:57 PM Carver County. MN 8. During the interview process, the Special Administrator inquired as to the following relative to each potential agenvIoroker and the relevant pmperty(ies) to be listed for sale: • Estimated list price; • Addifiena: estimated costs; • Level of experience; • Knowledge of the relevant marketplace: • Expected commissions on sale: • Term of listing agreement, • Reasonable repairs or maintenance necessary for efficient sale; and • Competitive advantages/special skills. 9. The Special Administrator believes that the real estate agents/brokers it has selected will assist in maximizing the value of the Estate's real property. In order to do so, however, they will need to immediately begin to list and market the Properties to take advantage of the current market and to allow sufficient time for preparation and sale. 10. The listing and save of various real estate holdings will allowthe Estate to increase its liquidity position to service estimated orate and income tax liabilities and improve its ability to meet ongoing administration expense obligations. As to the real estate parcels at issue, their costs of repair and ongoing maintenance we such that carrying these properties is not in the F=e's ben interest. The Court's advance approval of the performance of the tasks of listing and selling these properties will streamline the process and eliminex additions! and unnecessary hearings. pleadings and the attendant professional fns associated with same. 11. 1 understand that anomeys at Stinson Leonard Street LLP, on behalf of the Special Administrator, have shared the information contained above with counsel for the interested persons who have appearxl in this action. 12. The disclosure of the identity of the realtors under consideration would be detrimental to the Emie as we negotiate listing agreements. Atso, the public disclosure of the 3 COa IM35 eJGti2787da1e 11113=6 M-1 appraised values of those properties would also hamper the ability of the Special Administrator and its agents to negotiate sale tams that maximi= the return to the Estate from selling the real estate assets identi8cd in Exhibit A. FunhaallantsayethML —t ///'''��/////////111��.///tt1 Dated ; I Y A A.Ilaock Subscribed and mom to bcforc M this 2 201&^.9a day ofluly. 201 I;&.N. Notan ' \.,�: , GND!LYNN MYOEN rroTMrrLlitGublFs]II, ty Crreian Em;uJn7t, ffit Filed in First Judicial District Court 8/9/2016 2:54:57 PM Carver County, MN iuUMM1 a Filed in First Judicial District Court 8/9/2016 2:54:57 PM Carver County, MN 10 -PR -16-46 Filed in First Judicial District Court 8/9/2016 2:54:57 PM Carver County, MN a w 0 e 0 �o Q N W N N q � haw g s Ey 8 m m 2 N 7 h N M N M Filed in First Judicial District Court 8/9/2016 2:54:57 PM Carver County, MN a w 0 e 0 �o Q N W N N q � haw JL,;-2� Document No. A639072 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Recorded on -December 27, 2016 3:19 PM Fee: $46.00 illlll VIII III II III David Frischmon 639072 County Recorder (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT PAISLEY PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT dated October 24, 2016, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and Paisley Park Facility, LLC. BACKGROUND. A. The City has approved a rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park to Planned Unit Development (`PUD"). The PUD requires the Developer to enter in this Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 2. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall construct the following improvements by the dates indicated: A. Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left turn lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. B. Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. C. Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to "Bus Only' and 'Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. A permanent barrier island should be placed in the access to control the right-in/right-out. 1880550 D. A traffic study shall be completed at 6 and 12 months, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. E. Landscaping shall be planted by spring of 2017 and maintained per the PUD. 3. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 4. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $25,000.00. 5. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. B. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. D. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property and/or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. E. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other 1880550 agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. F. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. G. The Developer represents to the City that the development complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 6. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 7. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Paisley Park Facility, LLC, c/o Bremer Trust, National Association, 1100 West St. Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, PO Box147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317- 0147. (The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 1880550 ,r•�' '�" Clri s r ,�'"••.•.,,.N� tip! STATE OF MINNESOTA )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: / Denny 9iufenburg r, Mayor AND: `i'ntI odd Gerhardt, City Manager II Te foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � day of -Fc.J r , 2016, by Denny Laufenburger and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota My cOmmwwon ExPiM Jen 31. 2020 1880550 4 NOTA Y P C DEVELOPER: PAISLEY PARK FACILITY, LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company By, BREMER TRUST, National Association Its Sole Mem4pr By: Alison A. Hauck, Tpecial Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OFS46&4 S) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1f �day of NO 614 2016, by Alison A. Hauck, the Special Administrator of Bremer Trust, National Association, the sole member of Paisley Park Facility, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: XCAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association V860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 [RNK] 188055v1 17; NICOLE E. OLMSCHEID NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expres January 31, 2021 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT PAISLEY PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT dated October 24, 2016, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and Paisley Park Facility, LLC. BACKGROUND. A. The City has approved a rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park to Planned Unit Development (`PUD"). The PUD requires the Developer to enter in this Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 2. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall construct the following improvements by the dates indicated: A. Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left turn lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. B. Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. C. Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to 'Bus Only" and 'Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. A permanent barrier island should be placed in the access to control the right-in/right-out. SCANNED 1880550 D. A traffic study shall be completed at 6 and 12 months, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. E. Landscaping shall be planted by spring of 2017 and maintained per the PUD. 3. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 4. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $25,000.00. 5. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. B. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. D. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property and/or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. E. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other 1880550 agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. F. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. G. The Developer represents to the City that the development complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 6. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 7. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Paisley Park Facility, LLC, cfo Bremer Trust, National Association, 1100 West St. Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, PO Box147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317- 0147. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 1880550 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: �2, 16 Denny If5iufenburg r, Mayor (SEAL) AND: odd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Tn q+11 e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of a r , 2016, by Denny Laufenburger and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public:1 nota My Cpnntl88i_ Entree Jen 31, 2020 1880550 NOTAYY P C DEVELOPER: PAISLEY PARK FACILITY, LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company By, BREMER TRUST, National Association Its Sole Mem1rr By: Alison A. Hauck, pecial Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF54§ajO.,,�._ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1�lay of J 16A2016, by Alison A. Hauck, the Special Administrator of Bremer Trust, National Association, the sole member of Paisley Park Facility, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 [RNK] 188055A Aanenson, Kate From: Gerhardt, Todd Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:42 PM To: Aanenson, Kate; Oehme, Paul Subject: FW: Paisley Park FYI TG From: Joel Weinshanker [mailto:joel@graceland.com) Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 12:17 PM To: Gerhardt, Todd Subject: Paisley Park Todd, The estate has no plans, short/medium nor long term to expand Paisley Park, or any Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson entity, into any additional parcels of land in Chanhassen (with the possible exception of a parking lot, with the full co=operation of the city). Even if the estate were to contemplate such an action, it would not even consider doing this without the FULL approval by the town's staff, and would table any contemplation without it. The Primary purpose for Paisley Park's existence is to Secure and archive his creations, which he created in Chanhassen, for all posterity. The museum allows the facilitation of this goal. Adding attractions or anything of that nature would contradict that goal. No business plan exists necessitating hundreds of thousands of guests visiting, actually our interactions with guests so far has caused us to pivot to smaller groups that are given more personal attention, and being open less days than initially anticipated. Joel Weinshanker CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, NIINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City s zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, MN Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District shall apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted: 1. Museum. 2. Recording studio. 3. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than twenty percent (20%) of the floor space is used for retail sales. These sales may include food, beverages and memorabilia. 4. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each concert. 5. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each event. 6. Office. 7. Multiple buildings on a lot. C. Conditional Uses. The following conditional use is permitted: 1. Hotel. d. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses. SCANHEp 1890870 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. e. Materials and Design Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. L Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -in for buses only and right -out only for buses, and passenger vehicles. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 24, 2016. 5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses, junipers and barberry. g. Parking 1. Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left turn lane into the southernaccess. 4. All required permits, including from the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. 5. The north access shall be limited to a right -in for buses only and right -out of the site for buses and passenger vehicles. 1890870 6. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the SRF study. 7. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus. 8. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shall be by bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest cars per hour maximum. 9. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking or guests shall be bused to and from the site. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20 day of October, 2016, by the City Council of the City of sen, Minnesota 4�Z JA4�� Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny La nburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on November 3, 2016) 1890 A CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Affidavit of Publication Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's Southwest Newspapers zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: State Of Minnesota) Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver )SS. County, MN Section 2. Paisley Park County of Carver ) Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized development standards and agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- regulations of the IOP, industrial ?ager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: Office Park District shall apply subject to the following (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal modifications: newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as b. Permitted Uses. Only amended the following uses are permitted: 1. 1. Museum. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.L y 2. Recording studio. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and mi 3. Retail sales of products Notice is herebyincorporated as art of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of site provided no more than twenty stored or manufactured on the the newspaper pecifies Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both percent (20°h) of the floor space is inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition used for retail sales. These sales and publication of the Notice: may include food, beverages and memorabilia. abcdefghijkhnnopgrstuvwxyz 4. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan mustbe filed with the Cityatleast By_ ten (10) (10) days in advance of each Laurie A. Hartmann concert. 5. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be Sled with the City at least ten Subscribed and sworn before me on (10) days in advance of each event. 6. Office. 7. Multiple buildings on e / lac. Conditional Uses. this �dayof Ili /n;Y-1.^-L'�, 2016 The following conditional use is permitted: 1. Hotel. d. Prohibited Uses. The JYMME JEMNE7E SARK following uses are prohibited: N07ARf PUBLIC - U'NNESOTA 1. All conditional and Is— permitted uses not listed as N lic WYCOWSSIONWRES0i13V18 permitted or conditional uses. 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. e. Materials and Design Fences shall comply with City RATE INFORMATION Code requirements including the Lowest classified rate id b commercial users for comparable ace.... $31.20 column inch Buffer Yard requirements, except Pa Y Para space per that fences may be opaque to Maximum tate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch provide security screening. Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch L DevelopmentPhutsand Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan - SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -in for buses only and right -out only for buses, and passenger vehicles. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may hot exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 24, 2016. 5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses, junipers and barberry. g. Parking 1. Parking lots and parkingspaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size -shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access. 4. All required permits, including from the Riley - Purgatory -Bluff Creekwatershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. 5. The north access shall be limited to a right -in for buses only and right -out of the site for buses and passenger vehicles. 6. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the SRF study. 7. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there 9re a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus. B. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shall be by bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest cars per hour maximum. 9. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on- site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking or guests shall be bused to and from the site. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference andmadeapartof thisordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of October, 2016, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Iaufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, November 3.2016: No. 4364) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Request for a rezoning of property legally described as within Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park. — Planning Case No.2016-24 Application of PRN Music Corporation. On September 20, 2016, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of PRN Music Corporation to rezone property from IOP -Industrial Office Park to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned IOP -Industrial Office Park. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial. 3. The description of the property is: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city s service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The planning report #2016-24, dated September 20, 2016, prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20' day of September 2016. CHANHASSEN PLAN-NWG COMMISSION BY: � .., Its Chairman G:IPLAN\2016 Planning Cases\2016-24 Paisley Park MuseurnTindings of Fact.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 553 08/31/2016 12:46 PM Receipt No. 00325232 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Stinson Leonard 1201 Walnut Street Suite Kansan ------------------------------------------------------- Rezoning 750.00 Total Cash Check 268419 Change 750.00 0.00 750.00 0.00 SCANNED TBremer Wealth Management I loo wm Sc C Mitizi Sal Sc Cloud, MN 56301 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ATTN: JENNY POTTER PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ADDMONAL INFORMATION: PAID FOR: ORIGINATOR: V 'O No. 397057571 09/16/16 ***NON NEGOTIABLE*** AMOUNT $304.00 DISB CODE: 0445 ADMIN CODE: 00044 BANK ID: 0394 BRANCH ID: 0003 BATCH NO: CS000130 ACCOUNT: "*`"2608 ACCOUNT NAME: NELSON PRINCE ROGERS ESTATE DISB DESC: PROPERTY EXPENSE -MISC EXPLANATION: 29 REMAINING AMOUNT DUE PAISLEY PARK APPLICAT CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 09/19/2016 1:32 PM Receipt No. 00326746 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Bremer Wealth Management 1100 West St Germain Street St Cloud MN 56301- 7801 Audubon Road- 2016-24 ------------------------------------------------------- Notification Sign 200.00 Recording Fees 50.00 GIS List 54.00 Total Cash Check 397057571 Change 304.00 0.00 304.00 0.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, MN Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District shall apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted: I. Museum. 2. Recording studio. 3. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than twenty percent (20%) of the floor space is used for retail sales. These sales may include food, beverages and memorabilia. 4. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each concert. 5. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each event. 6. Office. 7. Multiple buildings on a lot. C. Conditional Uses. The following conditional use is permitted: 1. Hotel. d. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses. 1890870 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. e. Materials and Design Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. f. Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -in for buses only and right -out only for buses, and passenger vehicles. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 24, 2016. 5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses, junipers and barberry. g. Parking 1. Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left tum lane into the southern access. 4. All required permits, including from the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. 5. The north access shall be limited to a right -in for buses only and right -out of the site for buses and passenger vehicles. 1890870 6. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the SRF study. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus. 8. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shall be by bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest cars per hour maximum. 9. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking or guests shall be bused to and from the site. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24'^ day of October, 2016, by the City Council of the City of Sanhassent, Minnesota. �o Todd Gerhardt, City Manager DennyyLLau nburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on November 3, 2016) 1890870 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 11, Block 1. Chanhassen Lakes Business Park. Carver County, MN Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District shall apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted: 1. Museum. 2. Recording studio. 3. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than twenty percent (20%) of the Boor space is used for retail sales. These sales may include food, beverages and memorabilia. 4. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each concert. 5. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10)days in advance of each event. 6. Office. 7. Multiple buildings on IOL C. Conditional Uses. The following conditional use is permitted: 1. Hotel. it. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses. 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. e. Materials and Design Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. f. Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan - SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -in for buses only and right -out only for buses, and passenger vehicles. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages and Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized anent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- 'ager and hr.a full knowledge oftho facts herein stated as foilowc: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. 11 (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. (� l C was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and sai Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefgh ijkhnnopgrstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of I u ;v t t 12016 N tic Laurie A. Hartmann oJYMWIE JEAW!_T E EARK f . t`'' hTMY PI;BUC - KNNESOTA ' ;Y CO Y.,* OPIRESOL3':"6 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... S 12.59 per column inch 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 24, 2016. 5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses, junipers and barberry. g. Parking 1. Parking lots and parkingspaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Eire Code. 3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access. 4. All required permits, including from the Riley - purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. 5. The north access shall be limited to a right -in for buses only and right -out of the site for buses and passenger vehicles. 6. The traffic signal at Highway 5and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the SRF study 7. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus. 8. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shall beby bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest 9carsfethe on-site .Iparking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on- site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking or guests shall be bused to and from the site. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of October. 2016, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, November 3.2016 No. 4364) Cbanllaspn, MN Code of Ordinances ARTICLE VIII. - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTi111 about:blank Footnotes: --- (11)— Ediror's note—Section 1 of Ord. No. 749, adopted June 24, 1991, amended Art. Vlll, Div. 1, to read as herein set out. Former Art Vlll, Div. 7, §§ 20-501-20-505, pertaining to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 78(5-18-1-5-18-5), adopted Dec 15, 7986 and Ord. No. 136, § 1, adopted Jon. 28, 7991. DIVISION 1. -GENERALLY Sec. 20-501. - Intent. Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. It will be the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate that the city's expectation is to be realized as evaluated against the following criteria. Planned unit developments are to encourage the following: (1) Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, mature trees, creeks, wetlands, lakes and scenic views. (2) More efficient and effective use of land, open space and public facilities through mixing of land uses and assembly and development of land in larger parcels. (3) High quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. Site planning, landscaping and building architecture should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community. (4) Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city. (5) Development which is consistent with the comprehensive plan. (6) Parks and open space. The creation of public open space may be required by the city. Such park and open space shall be consistent with the comprehensive park plan and overall trail plan. (7) Provision of housing affordable to all income groups if appropriate within the PUD. (8) Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and sightings and the clustering of buildings and land uses. (9) Use of traffic management and design techniques including the provision of transit and pedestrian linkages to reduce the potential for traffic conflicts. Improvements to area roads and intersections may be required as appropriate. Where appropriate, the use of transportation demand management strategies may be required within a project. (Ord. No. 149, § 1, 6-24-91; Ord. No. 377, § 61, 5-24-04) Sec. 20-502. - Allowed uses. Specific uses and performance standards for each PUD shall be delineated in a development plan. (1) Each PUD shall only be used for the use or uses for which the site is designated in the comprehensive plan. Specific uses and performance standards for each PUD shall be delineated 1 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhaspen, MN Code of Ordinances in a PUD development plan. about:blank (2) Where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one land use in the comprehensive plan, the city may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the city council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this article and the comprehensive plan. (3) Residential development in a regional/lifestyle center commercial PUD, may only occur in conjunction with a commercial or office development and may not encompass more than 20 percent of the proposed development. The residential component of a development may be constructed concurrent or after construction of the commercial or office component, but may not proceed such commercial or office development. The phasing of the residential component shall be reviewed and approved as part of the development plan. (Ord. No. 149, § 1, 6-24-91; Ord. No. 377, § 62,5-24-04; Ord. No. 488, § 1, 11-23-09) Sec. 20-503. - District size and location. Each PUD shall have a minimum area of five acres except the regional/lifestyle center commercial PUD, which must be a minimum of 30 acres, unless the applicant can demonstrate the existence of one of the following: (1) Unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a PUD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of importance to the neighborhood or community. (2) The property is directly adjacent to or across a right-of-way from property which has been developed previously as a PUD or planned unit residential development and will be perceived as and will function as an extension of that previously approved development. (3) The property is located in a transitional area between different land use categories or on a collector, minor or principal arterial as defined in the comprehensive plan. (Ord. No. 149, § 1, 6-24-91; Ord. No. 377, § 63,5-24-04,, Ord. No. 488, § 2,11-23-09) Sec. 20-504. - Coordination with other zoning regulations. (a) Subdivision review under chapter 18 shall be carried out simultaneously with the review of a PUD. The plans required under this chapter shall be submitted in addition to or in a form which will satisfy the requirements of chapter 18 for the preliminary and final plat. (b) Site plan review under article II, division 6 of this chapter, shall be carried out for each nonsingle- family or duplex principal structure that is proposed. (c) PUD plans shall be coordinated with and in compliance with provisions of articles V, Viand VII of this chapter. (Ord. No. 149, § 1, 6-24-91; Ord. No. 377, § 64,5-24-04) Sec. 20-505. - Required general standards. (a) The city shall consider the proposed PUD from the point of view of all standards and purposes of the comprehensive land use plan to coordinate between the proposed development and the surrounding use. The city shall consider the location of buildings, compatibility, parking areas and other features with response to the topography of the area and existing natural features, the efficiency, adequacy and safety of the proposed layout of streets; the adequacy and location of green areas; the adequacy, location and screening of noncompatible land uses and parking areas. 2 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances about:blank (b) The applicant shall demonstrate that the PUD plan offers the city higher quality architectural and site design, landscaping, protection of wetlands, creeks and mature trees and buffering for adjoining properties that represent improvements over normal ordinance standards. (c) Density. An increase/transfer for density may be allowed at the sole discretion of the city utilizing the following factors: (1) Density within a PUD shall be calculated on net acreage located within the property lines of the site in accordance with the land use plan. (2) The area where the density is transferred must be within the project area and owned by the proponent. (3) Density transfer in single-family detached area will be evaluated using the items listed in sections 20-506 or -20-508. Density transfer eligible for multiple -family areas are not permitted to be applied to single-family areas. (4) In no case shall the overall density of the development exceed the net density ranges identified in the comprehensive plan except as specified in policies supporting the city's affordable housing goals. (d) The city may utilize incentives to encourage the construction of projects which are consistent with the city's housing goals. Incentives may include modification of density and other standards for developments providing low and moderate cost housing. Incentives may be approved by the city contingent upon the developer and the city entering into an agreement ensuring that the housing will be available to low and moderate income persons for a specific period of time. (e) Hard surface coverage shall be limited as follows: Comprehensive Plan Designation Hard Surface Coverage (%) Low or medium density residential 30 High density residential 50 Office 70 Commercial (neighborhood or community) 70 Commercial (regional) 70 Industrial 70 Mixed use 70 Individual lots within PUD may exceed these standards as long as the average meets these standards. (f) Building and parking setbacks from public streets shall be determined by the city based on characteristics of the specific PUD. Parking lots and driving lanes shall be set back at least 20 feet 3 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances from all exterior lot lines of a PUD. about:blank Where industrial uses abut developed platted or planned single-family lots outside the PUD, greater exterior building and parking setbacks, between 50 and 100 feet, shall be required in order to provide effective screening. The city council shall make a determination regarding the adequacy of screening proposed by the applicant. Screening may include the use of natural topography or earth berming, existing and proposed plantings and other features such as roadways and wetlands which provide separation of uses. PUD's must be developed in compliance with buffer yard requirements established by the comprehensive plan and chapter 20. article XXV, of the Chanhassen City Code. (g) More than one building may be placed on one platted or recorded lot in a PUD. (h) At the time PUD approval is sought from the city, all property to be included within a PUD shall be under unified ownership or control or subject to such legal restrictions or covenants as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the approved master development plan and final site and building plan. After approval, parcels may be sold to other parties without restriction, however, all parcels will remain subject to the PUD development contract that will be recorded in each chain - of -title. (i) Signs shall be restricted to those which are permitted in the sign plan approved by the city and shall be regulated by permanent covenants or design standards established in the PUD development contract. (j) The requirements contained in articles XXIII and XXV of this chapter may be applied by the city as it deems appropriate. (k) The uniqueness of each PUD required that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and subdivisions may be subject to modification from the city ordinances ordinarily governing them. The city council may therefore approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements if it finds that strict adherence to such standards or requirements is not required to meet the intent of this [article] or to protect the health, safety or welfare of the residents of the PUD, the surrounding area or the city as a whole. (1) No building or other permit shall be issued for any work on property included within a proposed or approved PUD, nor shall any work occur unless such work is in compliance with the proposed or approved PUD. (m) Bufferyards. (1) The city comprehensive plan establishes a requirement for buffer yards. Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density uses and shall comply with chapter 20, article XXV, of the Chanhassen City Code. (2) The buffer yard is not an additional setback requirement. The full obligation to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use. (3) The buffer yard is intended to provide physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use. As such, they will be required to be provided with a combination of berming, landscaping and/or tree preservation to maximize the buffering potential. To the extent deemed feasible by the city, new plantings shall be designed to require the minimum of maintenance, however, such maintenance as may be required to maintain consistency with the approved plan, shall be the obligation of the property owner. (Ord. No. 149, § 1, 6-24-91; Ord. No. 179, § 3,11-23-92; Ord. No. 240, § 14, 7-24-95; Ord. No. 315, § 2, 3-26-01; Ord. No. 377, §§ 65-68,5-24-04; Ord. No. 474, §§ 7, 8,10-13-08; Ord. No. 522, § 7,5-23-11) 4 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances about:blank Sec. 20-506. - Standards and guidelines for single-family detached residential planned unit developments. (a) Intent. The use of planned unit developments for residential purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city and the developer. The developer gains the potential for offering reduced lot sizes and flexibility in development standards which results in a combination of reduced development costs and improved marketing flexibility. At the same time, the city should be offered enhanced environmental sensitivity beyond normal ordinance requirements. Lot sizes should reflect the site's environmental limitations and opportunities and offer a range of housing pricing options. In addition, quality of development, as evidenced by landscaping, construction quality, provision of public/private open and recreational space, should also be enhanced. (b) Minimum lot size. The standard single-family residential PUD allows lot sizes down to a minimum of 11,000 square feet (excluding identified wetland areas from lot calculations). The applicant must demonstrate that there are a mix of lot sizes and proposed housing types consistent with the local terrain conditions, preservation of natural features and open space and that lot sizes are consistent with average building footprints that will be concurrently approved with the PUD. The applicant must demonstrate that each lot is able to accommodate a 60 -foot by 60 -foot building pad without intruding into any required setback area or protective easement. Each home must also have a minimum rear yard 30 feet deep. (c) Minimum lot width at building setback: 90 feet. (d) Minimum lot depth: 100 feet. (e) Minimum setbacks: (1) PUD exterior: 30 feet.* it=3p *The 30 -foot front yard setback may be waived by the city council when it is demonstrated that environmental protection will be enhanced. In these instances, a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet shall be maintained. it=3p Accessory buildings and structures: Located adjacent to or behind principal structure a minimum of ten feet from property line. (2) Front yard: 30 feet. (3) Rear yard: 30 feet. (4) Side yard: Ten feet. (f) Protection and preservation of natural features. The applicant must demonstrate that the flexibility provided by the PUD is used to protect and preserve natural features such as tree stands, wetlands, ponds and scenic views. These areas are to be permanently protected as public or private tracts or protected by permanently recorded easements. (g) Landscaping plan. An overall landscaping plan is required. The plan shall contain the following: (1) Boulevard plantings. Located in front yard areas shall require a mix of over -story trees and other plantings consistent with the site. A minimum of one over -story tree must be provided in each front yard. In place of mass grading for building pads and roads, stone or decorative block retaining walls shall be employed as required to preserve mature trees and the site's natural topography. (2) Exterior landscaping and double fronted lots. Landscaped berms shall be provided to buffer the site and lots from major roadways, railroads, and more intensive uses. Similar measures shall be provided for double -fronted lots. Where necessary to accommodate this landscaping, additional lot depth may be required. 5 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances aboutblank (3) Rear yard. The rear yard shall contain at least two over -story trees. Preservation of existing trees having a diameter of at least six inches at four feet in height can be used to satisfy this requirement of the PUD and the plans should be developed to maximize tree preservation. (h) Architectural standards. The applicant should demonstrate that the PUD will provide for a high level of architectural design and building materials. While this requirement is not intended to minimize design flexibility, a set of architectural standards should be prepared for city approval. The primary purpose of this section is to assure the city that high quality design will be employed and that home construction can take place without variances or impact to adjoining lots. The PUD agreement should include the following: (1) Standards for exterior architectural treatments. (2) Prohibition against freestanding garages maybe required by the city when it is felt that unattached garages will be difficult to accommodate due to small lot sizes. If an attached garage is to be converted to living space at some time in the future, the applicant will have to demonstrate that there is sufficient room to accommodate a two -car garage without variances to obtain a permit. (3) Guidelines regulating the placement of air conditioners, dog kennels, storage buildings, and other accessory uses that could potentially impact adjoining parcels due to small lot sizes. (Ord. No. 179, § 1, 11-23-92; Ord. No. 377, §§ 69, 70,5-24-04; Ord. No. 542, § 1, 6-25-12) Sec. 20-507. - Controls during construction and following completion. (a) The use of the land, the construction, modification or alteration of any buildings or structures in a PUD shall be governed by the final development plan. (b) After the certificate of occupancy has been issued, no changes shall be made in the approved final development plan for a PUD except: (1) Any minor extensions, alterations or modifications of existing buildings or structures maybe authorized by the city planner if they are consistent with the purposes and intent of the final plan. No change authorized by this section may increase the bulk of any building structure by more that ten percent. (2) Any building or structure that is totally or substantially destroyed may be reconstructed only in compliance with the final development plan unless an amendment to the final development plan is approved. (3) Changes in uses, any rearrangements of lots, blocks and building tracts, changes in the provisions of common open spaces, and all other changes to the approved final development plan may be made only after a public hearing conducted by the planning commission and upon final approval by the city council. Any changes shall be recorded as amendments to the final development plan. (c) Major amendments to an approved master development plan may be approved by the city council after review by the planning commission. The notification and public hearing procedure for such amendment shall be the same as for approval of the original PUD. A major amendment is any amendment which: (1) Substantially alters the location of buildings, parking areas or roads; (2) Increases or decreases the number of residential dwelling units by more than five percent, (3) Increases the gross floor area of nonresidential buildings by more than five percent or increases the gross floor area of any individual building by more than ten percent; 6 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances (4) Deceases the amount of open space by more than five percent or alters it in such away as to change its original design or intended use; or (5) Creates noncompliance with any special condition attached to the approval of the master development plan. (Ord. No. 149, § 1, 6-24-91) aboutblank Sec. 20-508. - Standards and guidelines for single-family attached or cluster -home PUDs. (a) Generally. Single-family attached, cluster, zero lot line, townhouses and similar type dwelling types may be allowed on sites designed for low, medium or high density residential uses by the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. (b) Minimum lot sizes. There shall be no minimum lot size; however, in no case shall net density exceed guidelines established by the city comprehensive plan. (c) Setback standards/structures and parking. (1) PUD exterior: 50 feet. (2) Interior public right-of-way: 30 feet.* it=3p *The 30 -foot front yard setback may be waived by the city council when it is demonstrated that environmental protection will be enhanced. In these instances, a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet shall be maintained. (3) Other setbacks: Established by PUD agreement. (d) Protection and preservation of natural features. The applicant must demonstrate that the flexibility provided by the PUD is used to protect and preserve natural features such as tree stands, wetlands, ponds and scenic views. These areas are to be permanently protected as public or private tracts or protected by permanently recorded easements. (e) Landscaping plan. An overall landscaping plan is required. The plan shall contain the following: (1) Boulevard plantings. Located in front yards shall require a mix of over -story trees and other plantings consistent with the site. Landscaped berms shall be provided to screen the site from major roadways, railroads and more intensive land uses. In place of mass grading for building pads and roads, stone or decorative blocks retaining walls shall be employed as required to preserve mature trees and the site's natural topography. (2) Exterior landscaping and double fronted lots. Landscaped berms shall be provided to buffer the site and lots from major roadways, railroads, and more intensive uses. Similar measures shall be provided for double -fronted lots. Where necessary to accommodate this landscaping, additional lot depth may be required. (3) Foundation and yard plantings. A minimum budget for foundation plants shall be established and approved by the city. As each parcel is developed in the PUD, the builder shall be required to install plant materials meeting or exceeding the required budget prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or provide financial guarantees acceptable to the city. (4) Tree preservation. Tree preservation is a primary goal of the PUD. A detailed tree survey should be prepared during the design of the PUD and the plans should be developed to maximize tree preservation. (f) Architectural standards. The applicant should demonstrate that the PUD will provide for a high level of architectural design and building materials. While this requirement is not intended to minimize design flexibility, a set of architectural standards should be prepared for city approval. The primary purpose of this section is to assure the city that high quality design will be employed and that home 7 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances about:blank construction can take place without variances or impact to adjoining lots. The PUD agreement should include the following: (1) Standards for exterior architectural treatments. (2) Prohibition against freestanding garages may be required by the city when it is felt that unattached garages will be difficult to accommodate due to small lot sizes. If an attached garage is to be converted to living space at some time in the future, the applicant will have to demonstrate that there is sufficient room to accommodate a two -car garage without variances to obtain a permit. (3) Guidelines regulating the placement of air conditioners, dog kennels, storage buildings and other accessory uses that could potentially impact adjoining parcels due to small lot sizes. (Ord. No. 179, § 2,11-23-92; Ord. No. 240, § 15,7-24-95; Ord. No. 315, § 3, 3-26-01; Ord. No. 377, §§ 70, 71, 5-24-04) Sec. 20-509. - Standards and guidelines for regional/lifestyle center commercial planned unit developments. (a) Intent. (1) The use of planned unit developments for regional/lifestyle center commercial purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city and the developer. This district is intended to provide for the development of regional and community scale integrated retail, office, business services, personal services and services to the traveling public near freeway interchanges. it shall strive to create a self-sustaining pattern of land uses with cultural, employment, entertainment, housing, shopping and social components. (2) The regional/lifestyle center commercial district is a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors. It shall be designed to serve pedestrian and mass transit users as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type, generally, have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity of mixed retail and service uses. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. (3) Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme, but shall avoid monotony in design and visual appearance. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. (b) Minimum lot size. 10,000 square feet (c) Minimum lot width at building setback: 100 feet. (d) Minimum lot depth: 100 feet. (e) Minimum setbacks: Building setbacks are also a function of the building height. As a building's height increases above 35 feet, the front, rear and project perimeter setback shall increase on a one to one basis. The increased setback shall only apply to that portion of the building that exceeds 35 feet, e.g., a 40 -foot tall building would be set back ten feet (front or rear) at that point where the building height equals 40 feet. A building height may step back, providing the setback/building height ratio is maintained. 8 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances aboutblank (1) PUD exterior: 30 feet. The 30 -foot PUD exterior setback may be changed, increased or decreased, by the city council as part of the approval process when it is demonstrated that environmental protection or development design will be enhanced. Building setbacks adjacent to exterior development lot lines abutting an area designated for residential use in the comprehensive plan shall be 50 feet, unless unique circumstances are found which would allow the city to reduce the setback requirement. (2) Front yard: 5 feet. (3) Rear yard: 5 feet. (4) Side yard: 0. (5) Parking: Setbacks (feet): Office 5 stories Front: 10 Side: 10 Rear: 10 7A (6) Parking setback exemptions: a. There is no minimum parking setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. b. Parking along public streets shall provide an appropriate transition, which shall incorporate such elements as landscaping, decorative fencing, public art, berming, etc. c. Parking setbacks adjacent to exterior development lot lines abutting an area designated for residential use in the comprehensive plan shall be 50 feet unless unique circumstances are found which would allow the city to reduce the setback requirement. Unique circumstances include site elevation, separation by natural features such as wetlands or stands of mature trees or substantial visual screening through berming and landscaping. (7) Parking standards shall comply with City Code for type and location. (f) Maximum building height: Commercial—retail 2 stories Commercial—services 3 stories Office 5 stories Residential 5 stories (g) Protection and preservation of natural features. The applicant must demonstrate that the flexibility provided by the PUD is used to protect and preserve natural features such as tree stands, wetlands, 9 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances ponds and scenic views. These areas are to be permanently protected as public or private tracts or protected by permanently recorded easements. (h) Landscaping plan. An overall landscaping plan is required. The plan shall contain the following: (1) Boulevard plantings. Located in front yards shall require a mix of over -story trees and other plantings consistent with the site. Landscaped berms shall be provided to screen the site from major roadways, railroads and less intensive land uses. In place of mass grading for building pads and roads, stone or decorative blocks retaining walls shall be employed as required to preserve mature trees and the site's natural topography. aboutblank (2) Exterior landscaping and double fronted lots. Landscaped berms shall be provided to buffer the site and lots from major roadways, railroads, and less intensive uses. Similar measures shall be provided for double -fronted lots. Where necessary to accommodate this landscaping, additional lot depth may be required. (3) Foundation and yard plantings. A minimum budget or plan for foundation plants shall be established and approved by the city. As each parcel is developed in the PUD, the builder shall be required to install plant materials meeting or exceeding the required budget or prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or provide financial guarantees acceptable to the city. (4) Tree preservation. Tree preservation is a primary goal of the PUD. A detailed tree survey should be prepared during the design of the PUD and the plans should be developed to maximize tree preservation. (i) Architectural standards. The applicant should demonstrate that the PUD will provide for a high level of architectural design and building materials. While this requirement is not intended to minimize design flexibility, a set of architectural standards should be prepared for city approval. The primary purpose of this section is to assure the city that high quality design will be employed and that home construction can take place without variances or impact to adjoining lots. The PUD agreement should include the following: (1) Standards for exterior architectural treatments; (2) Streetscape requirements: a. Every building shall incorporate a streetscape, public realm space between the building the roadway. The use of canopies, awnings or arcades is encouraged in these interfaces. b. Outdoor seating areas must be in a controlled or cordoned area with at least one access to an acceptable pedestrian walk. Seating areas may be shared by multiple uses. When a liquor license is involved, an enclosure is required around the outdoor seating area and the enclosure shall not be interrupted; access to such seating area must be through the principle building. Outdoor seating areas must be located and designed so as not to interfere with pedestrian and vehicular circulation. c. Streetscape elements shall include: Landscaping, lighting and street furniture such as benches, bus shelters, kiosks, planters, public art, tables and chairs, etc. (Ord. No. 488, § 3,11-23-09) Secs. 20-510-20-515. - Reserved. DIVISION 2. - PROCEDURES Sec. 20-516. - Preapplication conference. Prior to filing an application for PUD, the applicant shall attend a conference with city staff. The primary purpose of the conference shall be to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather 10 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances aboutblank information and obtain guidance on the general merits of the proposal and its conformity to the provisions of this article before incurring substantial expense. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 18(5-18-6(l)),12-15-86; Ord. No. 542, § 2, 6-25-12) Sec. 20-517. - General concept plan. (a) In order to receive guidance in the design of a PUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the planning commission and city council. Submission of a concept plan is optional but is highly recommended for large PUDs. In order for the review to be of most help to the applicant, the concept plan should contain such specific information as is suggested by the city. Generally, this information should include the following information appropriate to the type of development, e.g., commercial, industrial or residential: (1) Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways and road locations; (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; (3) Type, number or square footage or intensities of specific land uses; (4) Number of dwelling units; (5) Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved; and (6) Staging and timing of the development. (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten days prior to the hearing. Written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten days prior thereto to owners of land within 500 feet of the boundary of the property and an on-site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commission, the city council shall consider the proposal. The council may comment on the concept plan. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 18(5-18-6(2)),12-15-86; Ord. No. 377, § 72, 5-24-04; Ord. No. 409, § 3,1-9-06; Ord. No. 542, § 3, 6-25-12) Sec. 20-518. - Development stage. (a) The applicant shall submit the development stage application, preliminary plat and fee. The applicant shall file the development plans and preliminary plat, together with all supporting data. (b) With the appropriate notifications, the planning commission shall conduct the hearing on the preliminary plat and the rezoning and report its findings and make recommendations to the city council for action. (c) The development stage shall include, but not be limited to: (1) A preliminary plat and information required by chaffer 18. (2) An approved development plan drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals 100 feet 11 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances about:.blank containing at least the following information: a. Proposed name of the development. b. Property boundary lines and dimensions of the property and any significant topographical or physical features of the property. c. The location, size, use and arrangement including height in stories and feet and total square feet of ground area coverage and floor area of proposed buildings, and existing buildings which will remain, if any. d. Location, dimensions of all driveways, entrances, curb cuts, parking stalls, loading spaces and access aisles, and all other circulation elements, including bike and pedestrian; and the total site coverage of all circulation elements. e. The location, designation and total area proposed to be conveyed or dedicated for private and public open space, including parks, playgrounds, school sites and recreational facilities. f. The location, use and size of structures and other land uses located within 200 feet of the property boundary. g. A natural resource analysis identifying existing vegetation areas consisting of forest and wood lots as well as wetlands and wetlands vegetation; the geology, slope, soil and groundwater characteristics of the site; existing lakes, streams, ponds, drainage swales, runoff settling areas, and floodplains must be identified; analysis of the relationship of the proposed use of the existing natural conditions listed above. h. A proposed landscaping plan, including location of existing plants, identification of species, caliper size and acreage. i. The location, type and size of all graphics and signage. j. Any other information that may have been required by the planning commission or council in conjunction with the approval of the general concept plan. (3) An accurate legal description of the entire area within the PUD for which final development plan approval is sought. (4) A tabulation indicating the number of residential dwelling units and expected population. (5) A tabulation indicating the gross square footage, if any, of commercial and industrial floor space by type of activity. (6) Preliminary architectural "typical" plans indicating use, floor plan, elevations and exterior wall finishes of proposed building, including manufactured homes. (7) Preliminary grading and site alteration plan illustrating changes to existing topography and natural site vegetation. The plan should clearly reflect the site treatment and its conformance with the approved concept plan. (8) A soil erosion control plan acceptable to watershed districts, state department of natural resources, soil conservation service, or any other agency with review authority clearly illustrating erosion control measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. (9) Protective covenants and homeowners' association bylaws. (d) The city may request additional information from the applicant concerning operational factors or retain expert testimony at the expense of the applicant concerning operational factors. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 18(5-18-6(3)),12-15-86; Ord. No. 542, § 4, 6-25-12) Sec. 20-519. - Final stage. Following preliminary plat approval, the applicant for PUD shall prepare and submit the final plat and 12 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances aboutblank execute the development contract prepared by the city. If appropriate because of the limited scale of the proposal, the preliminary and final plats may proceed simultaneously. The city council shall then consider the submission for final approval and rezoning to PUD. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 18(5-18-6(4)), 12-15-86) Secs. 20-520-20-550. - Reserved. 13 of 13 6/16/2016 9:43 AM INDUSTRIAL OVENS 3007.2 'Oven nameplate. Safety data for Class A solvent atmospli re ovens shall be furnished on the manufacturer's nameplate. The nameplate shall provide the following design data: \\ 1. The solvent used. 2. The number of gallons (L) used per batch or per hour of solvent entering the oven. 3. The required purge time. 4. The oven operating temperature. 5. The exhaust blower rating for the number of gallons (L) of solvent per hour or batch at the maximum operating temperature. Exception: For lowoxyge ovens, the maximum allow- able oxygen concentration sbe included in place of the exhaust blower ratings. 3007.3 Training. Operating, tenance and supe personnel shall be thoroughly instructed and trained ' the operation of ovens or furnaces. 3007.4 Equipment maintenance. Equipment shall main- tained in accordance with the manufacturer's ins tions. 0 2015 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHAPTER 31 TENTS AND OTHER MEMBRANE STRUCTURES SECTION 3101 GENERAL 1 Scope. Tents and membrane structures shall comply this chapter. The provisions of Section 3103 are applica- ly to temporary tents and membrane structures. The " ions of Section 3104 are applicable to temporary and rrrmanent tents and membrane structures. SECTION 3102 DEFINITIONS 3102.1 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chap - t I R -INFLATED STRUCTURE. t I R -SUPPORTED STRUCTURE. MEMBRANE STRUCTURE. SECTION 3103 TEMPORARY TENTS AND MEMBRANE STRUCTURES 3103.1 General. All temporary tents and membrane struc- tures shall comply with this section. 3103.2 Approval required. Tents and membrane structures haN ing an area in excess of 400 square feet (37 mZ) shall not be erected, operated or maintained for any purpose without Gnt obtaining a permit and approval from the fire code offi- cial. ceptions: Tents used exclusively for recreational camping pur- poses. Tents open on all sides which comply with all of the following: 2.1. Individual tents having a maximum size of 700 square feet (65 m2). 2.2. The aggregate area of multiple tents placed side by side without a fire break clearance of 12 feet (3658 mm), not exceeding 700 square feet (65 ml total. 2.3. A minimum clearance of 12 feet (3658 mm) to all structures and other tents. aru3.3 Place of assembly. For the purposes of this chapter, a f assembly shall include a circus, carnival, tent show MO, , ,r, skating rink, dance hall or other place of assembly in OT under which persons gather for any purpose. 3103.4 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Sec- 4)ns 105.6 and 105.7. MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODE 3103.5 Use period. Temporary tents, air -supported, air - inflated or tensioned membrane structures shall not be erected for a period of more than 180 days within a 12 -month period on a single premises. 3103.6 Construction documents. A detailed site and floor plan for tents or membrane structures with an occupant load of 50 or more shall be provided with each application for approval. The tent or membrane structure floor plan shall indicate details of the means of egress facilities, seating capacity, arrangement of the seating and location and type of heating and electrical equipment. 3103.7 Inspections. The entire tent, air -supported, air - inflated r tensioned membrane structure system shall be inspeffed at regular intervals, but not less than two times per permit use period, by the permittee, owner or agent to deter- mine that the installation is maintained in accordance with this chapter. Exception: Permit use periods of less than 30 days. 3103.7.1 Inspection report. When required by the fire code official, an inspection report shall be provided and shall consist of maintenance, anchors and fabric inspec- tions. 3103.8 Access, location and parking. Access, location and parking for temporary tents and membrane structures shall be in accordance with this section. 3103.8.1 Access. Fire apparatus access roads shall be pro- vided in accordance with Section 503. 3103.8.2 Location. Tents or membrane structures shall not be located within 20 feet (6096 mm) of lot lines, build- ings, other tents or membrane structures, parked vehicles or internal combustion engines. For the purpose of deter- mining required distances, support ropes and guy wires shall be considered as part of the temporary membrane structure or tent. Exceptions: 1. Separation distance between membrane struc- tures and tents not used for cooking is not required when the aggregate floor area does not exceed 15,000 square feet (1394 mz). 2. Membrane structures or tents need not be sepa- rated from buildings when all of the following conditions are met: 2.1. The aggregate floor area of the membrane structure or tent shall not exceed 10,000 square feet (929 m). 2.2. The aggregate floor area of the building and membrane structure or tent shall not exceed the allowable floor area including increases as indicated in the International Building Code. E TENTS AND OTHER MEMBRANE STRUCTURES 2.3. Required means of egress are provided for both the building and the membrane structure or tent including travel dis- tances. 2.4. Fire apparatus access roads are provided in accordance with Section 503. 3103.8.3 Location of structures in excess of 15,000 square feet in area Membrane structures having an area of 15,000 square feet (1394 in) or more shall be located not less than 50 feet (15 240 mm) from any other tent or structure as measured from the sidewall of the tent or membrane structure unless joined together by a corridor. 3103.8.4 Membrane structures on buildings. Membrane structures that are erected on buildings, balconies, decks or other structures shall be regulated as permanent membrane structures in accordance with Section 3102 of the Interna- tional Building Code. 3103.8.5 Connecting corridors. Tents or membrane structures are allowed to be joined together by means of corridors. Exit doors shall be provided at each end of such corridor. On each side of such corridor and approximately opposite each other, there shall be provided openings not less than 12 feet (3658 mm) wide. 3103.8.6 Fire break. An unobstructed fire break passage- way or fire road not less than 12 feet (3658 mm) wide and free from guy ropes or other obstructions shall be main- tained on all sides of all tents and membrane structures unless otherwise approved by the fire code official. 3103.9 Anchorage required. Tents or membrane structures and their appurtenances shall be adequately roped, braced and anchored to withstand the elements of weather and prevent against collapsing. Documentation of structural stability shall be furnished to the fire code official on request 3103.10 Temporary air -supported and air -inflated mem- brane structures. Temporary air -supported and air -inflated membrane structures shall be in accordance with Sections 3103.10.1 through 3103.10.4. 3103.10.1 Door operation. During high winds exceeding 50 miles per hour (22 m/s) or in snow conditions, the use of doors in air -supported structures shall be controlled to avoid excessive air loss. Doors shall not be left open. 3103.10.2 Fabric envelope design and construction. Air -supported and air -inflated structures shall have the design and construction of the fabric envelope and the method of anchoring in accordance with Architectural Fabric Structures Institute ASI 77. 3103.103 Blowers. An air -supported structure used as a place of assembly shall be furnished with not less than two blowers, each of which has adequate capacity to maintain full inflation pressure with normal leakage. The design of the blower shall be so as to provide integral limiting pres- sure at the design pressure specified by the manufacturer. 3103.10.4 Auxiliary power. Places of public assembly for more than 200 persons shall be famished with either a fully automatic auxiliary engine -generator set capable of powering one blower continuously for 4 hours, or a sup- plementary blower powered by an internal combustion engine which shall be automatic in operation. 3103.11 Seating arrangements. Seating in tents or mem- brane structures shall be in accordance with Chapter 10. 3103.12 Means of egress. Means of egress for temporary tents and membrane structures shall be in accordance with Sections 3103.12.1 through 3103.12.8. 3103.12.1 Distribution. Exits shall be spaced at approxi- mately equal intervals around the perimeter of the tent or membrane structure, and shall be located such that all points are 100 feet (30 480 mm) or less from an exit. 3103.12.2 Number. Tents, or membrane structures or a usable portion thereof shall have at least one exit and not less than the number of exits required by Table 3103.12.2. The total width of means of egress in inches (mm) shall not be less than the total occupant load served by a means of egress multiplied by 0.2 inches (5 mm) per person. 3103.123 Exit openings from tents. Exit openings from tents shall remain open unless covered by a flame -resistant curtain. The curtain shall comply with the following requirements: 1. Curtains shall be free sliding on a metal support.The support shall be a minimum of 80 inches (2032 mm) above the floor level at the exit. The curtains shall be so arranged that, when open, no part of the curtain obstructs the exit. TABLE 3103.12.2 MINIMUM NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS AND MEANS OF EGRESS WIDTHS FROM TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRUCTURES AND TENTS OCCUPANT LOAD MINIMUM NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS MINIMUM WIDTH OF EACH MEANS OF EGRESS (inches) Tend MINIMUM WIDTH OF EACH MEANe EGRESS (Inches) Membrane Structure 10 to 199 2 72 36 200 to 499 3 72 72 500 to 999 4 96 72 1,000 to 1,999 5 120 96 2,000 to 2,999 6 120 96 Over 3,000' 7 120 96 For SI: 1 incb = 25.4 mm. a When the occupant load exceeds 3,000, the total width of theses of egress (in inches) shall not be less than the total occupant load multiplied by person. 254 2015 MINNESOTA STATE 2. Curtains shall be of a color, or colors, that contrasts with the color of the tent. 3103.12.4 Doors. Exit doors shall swing in the direction of exit travel. To avoid hazardous air and pressure loss in air - supported membrane structures, such doors shall be auto- matic closing against operating pressures. Opening force at the door edge shall not exceed 15 pounds (*6 N). 3103.125 Aisle. The width of aisles without fixed seating shall be in accordance with the following: ;!. I. In areas serving employees only, the minimum aisle width shall be 24 inches (610 mm) but not less than the width required by the number of employees served. 2. In public areas, smooth -surfaced, unobstructed aisles having a minimum width of not less than 44 inches (1118 mm) shall be provided from seating areas, and aisles shall be progressively increased in width to provide, at all points, not less than 1 foot (305 mm) of aisle width for each 50 persons served by such aisle at that point. 25.1 arrang Arrangement and maintenance. The arrangement of aisles shall be subject to approval by the fire code official and shall be maintained clear at all times during occupancy. 3103.12.6 Exit signs. Exits shall be clearly marked. Exit signs shall be installed at required exit doorways and where otherwise necessary to indicate clearly the direction of egress when the exit serves an occupant load of 50 or more. 3103.12.6.1 Exit sign illumination. Exit signs shall be either listed and labeled in accordance with UL 924 as the internally illuminated type and used in accordance with the listing or shall be externally illuminated by luminaires supplied in the following manner: I. Two separate circuits, one of which shall be cepa- rate from all other circuits, for occupant loads of 300 or less; or 2. Two separate sources of power, one of which shall be an approved emergency system, shall be Provided when the occupant load exceeds 300. Emergency systems shall be supplied from stor- age batteries or from the on-site generator set, and the system shall be installed in accordance With NFPA 70. The emergency system provided shall have a minimum duration of 90 minutes when operated at full design demand. 3103.12.7 Means of egress illumination. Means of egress shall be illuminated with light having an intensity of not less than 1 footcandle (11 lux) at floor level while the structure is occupied. Fixtures required for means of egress illumination shall be supplied from a separate cir- cuit or source of power. 3103 12 Mai wtdih utenance of means of egress. The required at of exits, aisles and passageways shall be maintained all times to a public way. Guy wires, guy ropes and kk[�ter support members shall not cross a means of egress at [#1IN4ESOTA STATE FIRE CODE TENTS AND OTHER MEMBRANE STRUCTURES a height of less than 8 feet (2438 mm). The surface of means of egress shall be maintained in an approved man- ner. SECTION 3104 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT TENTS AND MEMBRANE STRUCTURES 3104.1 General. All tents and membrane structures, both temporary and permanent, shall be in accordance with this section. Permanent tents and membrane structures shall also comply with the International Building Code. 3104.2 Flame propagation performance treatment. Before a permit is granted, the owner or agent shall file with the fire code official a certificate executed by an approved testing laboratory certifying that the tents and membrane structures and their appurtenances; sidewalls, drops and tarpaulins; Aaopr coverings, bunting and combustible decorative materi- als and effects, including sawdust when used on floors or pas- sageways, are composed of material meeting the flame Propagation performance criteria of NFPA 701 or shall be treated with a flame retardant in an approved manner and meet the flame propagation performance criteria of NFPA 701, and that such flame propagation performance criteria are effective for the period specified by the permit. 31043 LabeL'Membrane structures or tents shall have a per- manently affixed label hearing the identification of size and fabric or material type. 3104.4 Certification. An affidavit or affirmation shall be submitted to the fire code official and a copy retained on the Premises on which the tent or air -supported structure is located. The affidavit shall attest to the following information relative to the flame propagation performance criteria of the fabric: 1. Names and address of the owners of the tent or air -sup- ported structure. 2. Date the fabric was last treated with flame-retardant solution. 3. Trade name or kind of chemical used in treatment. 4. Name of person or firm treating the material. 5. Name of testing agency and test standard by which the fabric was tested. 31045 Combustible materials. Hay, straw, shavings or sim- ilar combustible materials shall not be located within any tent or membrane structure containing an assembly occupancy, except the materials necessary for the daily feeding and care of animals. Sawdust and shavings utilized for a public perfor- mance or exhibit shall not be prohibited provided the sawdust and shavings are kept damp. Combustible materials shall not be permitted under stands or seats at any time. 3104.6 Smoking. Smoking shall not be permitted in tents or membrane structures. Approved "No Smoking" signs shall be conspicuously posted in accordance With Section 310. 3104.7 Open or exposed flame. Open flame or other devices emitting flame, fire or heat or any flammable or combustible liquids, gas, charcoal or other cooking device or any other HIGH - PILED STOR CON: DEM WELD HOT W MART ZVA ft Aanenson, Kate From: Matt Pacyna <mpacyna@srfconsulting.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 8:38 AM To: Oehme, Paul; Aanenson, Kate Subject: FW: 7801 Audubon Traffic/Parking Study Attachments: Site Plan.pdf� Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged FYI... From: Phelps, Todd[mailto:Todd.Phelps@stinson.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 6:00 PM To: Matt Pacyna <mpacyna@srfconsulting.com> Subject: RE: 7801 Audubon Traffic/Parking Study Matt, Please see the answers in blue text below. Please let me know if you have further questions. Thank you. Todd Todd M. Phelps I Partner I Stinson Leonard Street LLP 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55402 T: 612.335.1871 1 M: 612.251.1049 1 F: 612.335.1657 todd.phelps@stinson.com I www.stinson.com Legal Administrative Assistant: Joleen Longbehn 1612.335.1989 1 ioleen.longbehn@stinson.com This communication (including any attachments) is from a law firm and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please contact the sender for instructions concerning return or destruction, and do not use or disclose the contents to others. From: Matt Pacyna fmailto:mpacyna(bsrfconsultina.coml Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 1:07 PM To: Phelps, Todd Subject: 7801 Audubon Traffic/Parking Study Todd, Can you confirm a few items for the study. I keep seeing conflicting info between the original business plan, info we discussed during the meeting, and the paisley park website. Here are my questions: 1) What are the true hours of operation for the site and each tour (i.e. how long can each group stay....different for General Admission versus VIP?). This has changed from the original plan. Presently, the operator indicated that the initial hours of operation will be from 9:00 am to 9:00 pm seven days a week. 2) What is the total/max number of guest allowed for each tour? Please include the breakdown of General Admission versus VIP. Presently, the operator indicated that it expects a maximum of 50 people per regular tour and a maximum of 15 people on a VIP tour. 3) What is the maximum number of employees on site at any given time? Presently, the operator indicated that it expects to employ a maximum of 60 people on site, with no more than 20 vehicles on site at a time, to be parked in the back of the facility and in the underground parking garage. 4) Is there a site plan for the proposed gate operations or expanded parking areas? Attached. Or any other improvements planned for the site at this time? No exterior improvements are planned at this time. Some minor interior improvements are planned (i.e. widening of certain doorways, etc.). 5) How many parking spaces are available in the garage under the facility? 18-20, depending upon how they are counted. You may need to confirm the number yourself. Confirm these will be for employees only? Confirmed—employee only. 6) Has there been any mention of a satellite lot to shuttle in guests? If so, where would it be located? Not at this time, although the operator continues to have discussions with MSP airport, Mall of America and tour bus operators to potentially provide bus service from these locations to Paisley Park. Let me know with any questions. Matt Pacyna, PE (MN, ND, WI) Senior Associate SRF Consulting Group, Inc. fax: 763.475.2429 1 mpacynaPsrfconsulting.com main: 763.475.0010 ) direct: 763.249.6726 1 mobile: 612.382.2546 One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 www.srfconsulting.com _001111111110— L,�] W PLOP entrance expansion r P�OaP5e0 ten; proposed lot extension W k en7.1 City of Chanhassen Press Release August 24, 2016 PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM — 7801 AUDUBON ROAD The City of Chanhassen has received a request from Bremer Trust, the court-appointed special administrator of the estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, for a development review application. This application is for a rezoning of the property to permit the use of Paisley Park as a museum. A public hearing is scheduled for review by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 20 at 7:00 pm in the City Hall Council Chambers. The staff report for this hearing will include a review of site issues (parking, hours of operation, traffic, etc.) and a recommendation to the City Council for their review at a special meeting on Monday, October 3, 2016 at 7:00 pm to be held in the council chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. Information regarding this proposal can be found on the city's website at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-24. Both the Planning Commission meeting and the City Council meeting can be viewed live on the city's website at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/aRendas. Media inquiries should be directed to David Beckwith at Davidna thebeckwithcompanv.com. August 24, 2016 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing forToday and Planning forTomorrow On behalf of the entire community of Chanhassen, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the family of Prince Rogers Nelson and Special Administrator Bremer Trust for their recent announcement to make Paisley Park available to be visited by his multitude of fans around the world. Chanhassen leaders and employees have received comments from thousands of people since Prince's death on April 21, a majority of which were in support of Paisley Park being preserved as an historic museum that celebrates the life and genius of this entertainment icon who made his home in our community. Bremer Trust has made application through City Hall for development review to rezone the property for use as a museum. As is our responsibility, we will give this application consideration including hearing comments from the interested public parties at a Planning Commission meeting on September 20, 2016. 1 have arranged for a special meeting of the City Council on October 3, 2016 to give final consideration to the application. From the documents that I've seen and the conversations that I've had with family members and close friends, I believe that the plans for Paisley Park are in full accordance with Prince's wishes. Much of his vision and design activity for Paisley Park as a museum is already in place. He knew exactly how to showcase his production studio for his fans in preparation for this eventual outcome. Chanhassen will be pleased to demonstrate to the thousands of visitors to Paisley Park the same hospitality and respect that Prince enjoyed during his time in Chanhassen. Denny Laufenburger Mayor of Chanhasse PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. CITY OF CHANHASSEx Count Of Carver CARVER & HENNEPIN Y ) COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2016-24 Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swoon, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- that the Chanhassen Planning lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September A These news have complied with the 20, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council ( ) Papers P requirements constituting qualification as a legal Chambers in Chanhassen City newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The amended purpose of this hearing is to j consider a request to rezone (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.�_ A - property located u tri Audubon was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Road from Industrial Office Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of Park (IOP) IO Planned Unit the news specified. Printed below is a of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both Development IOP to facilitate the �� spcer cePY p use of the building as a museum, inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition Applicant: Bremer Trust Owner: and publication of the Notice: Bremer Trust. A plan showing the location abcdefghuklmnopgrstuvwxyz of the proposal is available for public review the City's web site at wwwci.c.chanhassen. mn.us/2016-24 or at City Hall during regular business hours. LaurieA. Hartmann All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Subscribed and swom before me on Kate Aanenson, ACIS Email: kaanenson@ ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952.227-1139 this Z day of 016 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, September 8, 2016: No. 4332) JYMME JEANNEfTE BAr'iK NTARf PUBJC - MNNESO?A Z� WYMMMISSIONWRE80impe Public RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.59 per column inch SCANNED 7801 Audubon Rd - 2016-24 $750.00 Rezoning $200.00 Notification Sign $54.00 Property Owners List (18 addresses x $3 each) $50.00 Escrow for recording variance documents $1,054.00 TOTAL $750.00 Check number 268419 $304.00 BALANCE OWED l Jectronically Served 8/17/2016 12:49 PM Scanned by Carver County Court Administration 8/17/2016 3:16:08 PM Carver County, MN STATE OF MINNESOTAFILED DISTRIC"F COURT AUG 17 2016 COUNTY OF CARVERC�RVERCOUNIYCOURT� FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT PROBATE DIVISION Case Type: Special Administration In the Matter of: Court File No. 10 -PR -16-46 Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, Decedent, ORDER REGARDING EXHIBITION OPERATING AGREEMENT FOR and PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM Tyka Nelson, Filed Under Temporary Seal Petitioner. Pursuant to the Court's Order of June 8, 2016, the Special Administrator moved the Court for expedited authorization to enter into an Exhibition Operating Agreement for a Paisley Park museum. The Agreement provides for the creation and operation of Paisley Park as a museum to honor Prince's legacy while also generating revenue to the Estate from sales of exhibition tickets and Paisley Park merchandise. The Special Administrator requested expedited approval to enter into the Agreement to accomplish the goal of opening the museum in early October 2016 given the significant amount of work that needs to be done. The Special Administrator has discussed the terms of the Agreement with counsel for potential beneficiaries on multiple occasions and provided a copy of the written agreement to counsel on August 11, 2016, with further revisions incorporated in the Agreement submitted today via the Krishnan affidavit. None of the potential beneficiaries, as defined in this Court's prior Orders, object to the Agreement. 8/17/2016 12:49 PM Scanned by Carver County Court Administration Accordingly, based upon this Court's review of the Agreement, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: The Special Administrator is authorized to enter into the Agreement in the form proposed or in a final form that is a reasonable variation thereof with the same essential terms as referenced in Exhibit A to the Affidavit of Laura E. Krishnan (Filed Under Seal); 2. The Court confirms that the Notice of Motion and Motion shall be filed UNDER SEAL pursuant to Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 11.06(c); The Court confirms that the affidavits of L. Londell McMillan, Patrick J. Mazorol, and Laura E. Krishnan, including their attached exhibits, shall be filed UNDER SEAL pursuant to Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 11.06(c); 4. This Order is filed UNDER SEAL pursuant to Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 11.06(c) until the Paisley Park museum is publicly announced. Dated: August fl., 2016 Kevin W. Eide Judge of District Court PC DATE: September 20, 2016 Blc;� CC DATE: October 3, 2016 —� REVIEW DEADLINE: October 26, 2016 CASE # 2016-24 BY: AF, KA, TJ, JS, JM PROPOSED MOTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motions: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot I 1 Block 1 Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance and Finding of Fact." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant Bremer Trust National Association, the Special Adminis for of the Estate Prince Rogers Nelson has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate aisley Park. They are requesting a rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow a museum as a permitted use in the zoning district. LOCATION: 7801 Audubon Road (Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park) APPLICANT: PRN Music Corporation) 1100 West St. Germain Street 9-elp St. Cloud, MN 55447-4443 AAHauckABremer.com PRESENT ZONING: Industrial Office Park (IOP) 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office Industrial ACREAGE: approximately 9 acres LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAIGNG: U/ \ /nJ � The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning because the city is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A PUD must be consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The site is currently zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP). A museum is not permitted use in this district. A museum is permitted in the Office Institutional District zoning district however, this district would not permit other uses that are currently contained or proposed at Paisley Park including the recording studios, special events or boutique hotel. By rezoning the property to PUD the city can set the standards for use of the property. The staff is recommending rezoning the site to PUD with the IOP as the underlying district except as amended. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 2 of 18 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20 • Article VIII, Planned Unit Development District • IOP District Standards EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is bordered by TH 5 on the north, Audubon Road on the west, the city's public works on the south, and wetland with a stream running through it on the east. Access to the site is gained via two drives off of Audubon Road. Paisley Park was built in 1986 as a recording studio. The 9 - acre site contains an existing building with a footprint of 46,150 square feet. Location Map Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 3 of 18 1986 Site plan BACKGROUND Paisley Park Facility has entered into an Exhibition Operating Agreement with PPARK Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Graceland Holdings, LLC to operate the Exhibition. The operations of the museum based on the Business Plan include: • No exterior construction other than relating to the parking lot and perimeter fencing. • Plan to be open October 6'. • Hours of operation will be from 9 am to 9 pm on weekdays and 9 am to midnight on the weekends (hours will vary depending on ticket sales). • Tickets will only be sold on line and cannot be purchased at the site. • Tours will be in 10 -minute increments and each tour would have 25-30 guests. • Anticipate a total of 1500 to 2000 guest a day on the peak days. • Intended to have internal circulation to check in guest on the premises. • The museum will have 24/7 security. • Food and beverage will be sold at the conclusion of the tour. There will be a tent located near the kitchen for guests to sit and eat. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 4 of 18 • No alcoholic beverages will be sold or permitted on the property. • There will be merchandise for sale. • The recording studio will be used for special sessions. • There will be no events held outside Paisley Park Museum. • Concerts will continue in the performance hall. These events could be up to 1500 people and will be coordinated to ensure they don't conflict with the museum tours. • In the future, the round building may be developed into a boutique hotel. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The 2030 Land Use Plan has this property guided Office Industrial. The proposed zoning is consistent with this land use. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT Sec. 20-501. Intent. "Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfer of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other, more standard zoning districts. It will be the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate that the city's expectations are to be realized as evaluated against the following criteria. Planned unit developments are to encourage the following: Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, mature trees, creeks, wetlands, lakes and scenic views. Anakusis: The changes to exterior of the site include additional parking and more capacity for storm water. 2. More efficient and effective use of land, open space and public facilities through mixing of land uses and assembly and development of land in larger parcels. Anakusis: Not applicable to this proposal. 3. High quality design and design compatibility with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. Site planning, landscaping and building architecture should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 5 of 18 Analysis: The building's architecture is unique. No changes to the exterior are planned. 4. Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city will be encouraged. Analysis: Not applicable to this proposal. Development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The subject site is guided Office Industrial The development is consistent with the comprehensive plan for industrial use. 6. Parks and open space. The creation of public open space may be required by the city. Such park and open space shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Park Plan and overall trail plan. Analysis: Not applicable to this proposal. Provision of housing affordable to all income groups if appropriate with the PUD. Analysis: Not applicable to this proposal. 8. Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and siting and the clustering of buildings and land uses. Analysis: Not applicable to this proposal. 9. Use of traffic management and design techniques to reduce the potential for traffic conflicts. Improvements to area roads and intersections may be required as appropriate. Analysis, A detailed traffic and parking study was prepared by SRF. Based on this study, staff has provided a detailed analysis of the traffic level of service and parking scenarios. Implementation of these options shall reduce the potential for conflicts. SITE PLAN REVIEW City staff will administratively review improvements to the site including parking lot expansion and new perimeter fencing. Sec. 20-108 of the city code permits administrative review of changes to a site plan. If the changes are less than ten percent of its gross floor area, provided that there is no variance involved and also provided that the community development director has conducted an administrative review pursuant to site plans standards. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 6 of 18 The intention of the operator is to install a new perimeter fence. The fence may be opaque and will limit visibility of the building. In addition, it will discourage things from being attached on the fence. The fence will be required to follow the city fencing ordinances. A tent is proposed in the northwest side of the building. Per.the building code, a tent is a temporary structure and shall not be erected for more than 120 ys m a 12 -month period. This tent must comply with building and fire code requirements. ales, including mLa andise, food and non-alcoholic beverages shall be limited and comply with the city code states "Retail sales of products stored or manufachued on the site provided no more 20 percent of the floor space is used for retail sales." ENGINEERING COMMENTS Grading The submittal did not contain a grading plan. Prior to any site disturbance a grading plan must be submitted for review and approval. Utilities The site is currently served by municipal sanitary sewer and water; upgrades to these facilities are not required at this time. The applicant shall submit the proposal to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services division (MCES) for a new Sanitary Access Charge (SAC) unit determination. If the MCES determines that the conversion to a museum results in additional SAC units, City SAC and Water Access Charges (WAC) and the MCES SAC charges must be paid. Future surface improvements such as driveway and parking lot expansion will require storm system improvements such as storm sewer installation and best management practices as required by the city and the watershed district. Traffic -r 6& L,VO/ The property is located in the southeast corner of Trunk Highway 5 and Audubon Road. Highway 5 is classified as an arterial roadway and is under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT). Approval of the PUD and Site Plan are subject to MNDOT's conditions. Audubon Road, a two-lane major collector is identified as an "Important Transportation Facility" in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which states: This route connects TH 5, a major arterial, to Lyman Boulevard, another major arterial road. This route, in conjunction with Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road south Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 7 of 18 (CSAH 15), provides extended north -south transportation between communities. Audubon Road serves both residential and industrial development. A traffic study by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. was commissioned to evaluate the following: • Review existing operations of the study area, • Evaluate traffic impacts of the proposed development, • Evaluate the parking impacts of the proposed development, • Review the proposed access to the development, • Evaluate the site circulation and overall site operations, and • Recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development. A copy of the study is attached to this report. The traffic study estimates that the site will generate 4,000 trips per day based on the proposed tour size and schedule (65 guest/tour with a tour beginning every 10 minutes). The study estimates approximately 312 peak hour trips, meaning during the busiest hour on the adjacent routes, the proposed development would see 156 trips into the site and 156 trips out of the site. The existing and projected 2016 average daily traffic (ADT) volume is shown on Figure 1. As noted in Figure 1 the traffic on Audubon Road is estimated to be 7,800 ADT. As a comparison the 2015 ADT was 7,500 on West 78b Street between Great Plains Boulevard and Highway 101, a two-lane major collector roadway. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 8 of 18 Tours will operate from 9 am to 9 pm every day except for Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. The traffic study analyzed two peak trip generation scenarios: the PM weekday peak (4:30 pm to 5:30 pm) and the Saturday midday peak (11:45 am to 12:45 pm). The AM weekday peak was not analyzed as it does not correspond to the operating hours of Paisley Park. Supplemental traffic counts were taken on Audubon Road during the Saturday, September 3, 2016 Auto Motorplex event as the facility hosts a monthly event on a Saturday morning between 8 and 11. The Saturday event conditions were not reviewed as there would be limited impact on the system. The study observed the existing and projected the proposed traffic operations of the intersection of Audubon Road at Highway 5, Coulter Boulevard and Park Place. The existing and projected Level of Service (LOS, an indication of the quality of traffic flow) through each intersection was identified. The LOS designations range from A to F, with "A" representing an average delay less than 10 seconds/vehicle and "F" representing a delay greater than 50 seconds/vehicle (unsignalized intersection) or 80 seconds/vehicle (signalized intersection). The graphics below show the existing and anticipated traffic volumes and levels of service at the Audubon Road intersections at Highway 5 and the northern access; information on the McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard and Park Road intersections can be found in the traffic study. The analysis assumed no improvements to the roadway system, guests would access Paisley Park from the northern access, and employees of Paisley Park would use the southern access. (weekday PM peak volume/Saturday midday peak volume) Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 9 of 18 The (weekday PM peak volume/Saturday midday peak volume) under the forecasted conditions: into will i ♦ 4i r'5 t y = P N4 • i .Ili lit Figure 4. queuing assuming no improvements to the system. These queues would be a safety concern and would reduce the level of service at the Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection. Altering the timing of signal at the intersection would not remedy Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 10 of 18 the situation due to the proximity of the northern access to Highway 5. This access lies 100 feet south of Highway 5; per Figure 7-12 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan the access should be a minimum of 220 feet south of Highway 5. The study presents two options to address the queuing: Figure 5. Option 1: Relocate the northern entrance a minimum of 100' south of the current location Figure 6. Option 2: Utilize the southern entrance as the main access to the site; close or limit the northern entrance to a partial access Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 11 of 18 The study indicates that Option 2 would result in the best traffic operations. Table 1 summarizes the current and projected levels of service of the affected intersections assuming: • Implementation of Option 2 • Traffic signal timing optimization at the Highway 5 intersection, and • Restriping Audubon Road to include a left turn lanes to the southern access and McGlynn Road. Staff prefers a hybrid of Option 1 and Option 2: shift the northern access such that it is 220' south of Highway 5, limit the northern entrance to a right -out of the site, utilize the southern entrance as the full access to Paisley Park, and restripe Audubon Road to include a left turn lane into the southern entrance and McGlynn Road. Staff will work with MNDOT with regards to the signal timing at Highway 5 and Audubon Road. Comment from MNDOT has not been received at this time, therefore any approvals shall be subject to MNDOT's conditions. Parking Analysis and Site Plan The SRF study included a site plan with proposed parking as shown in Figures 5 and 6 of this report. The site currently has 165 parking spaces: 105 spaces within the northern parking lot (currently only accessible by the northern access) 42 spaces within the southern parking lot (currently only accessible by the southern access) 18 spaces within an underground parking garage Based on the Paisley Park proposal for 65 guests per tour, tours departing every 10 minutes, and limiting the time guests stay SRF determined that 230 spaces are required to accommodate on- site parking for all guests. Due to the timing of Paisley Park's application and the impending end Highway 5 and Paisley Park North Access and Audubon Road Intersection Audubon Road Intersection Weekday PM Saturday Midday Weekday PM Saturday Midday Existing Level of Service Level of Service Condition B B n/a n/a 17 second delay 12 second dela Proposed, Level of Service Level of Service Level of Service Level of Service current system D B A/B A/B second dela 17 second dela 13 second dela 13 second dela �� sed46 system Level of Service Level of Service changes C B n/a n/a im lemented 22 second delay 17 second delay Staff prefers a hybrid of Option 1 and Option 2: shift the northern access such that it is 220' south of Highway 5, limit the northern entrance to a right -out of the site, utilize the southern entrance as the full access to Paisley Park, and restripe Audubon Road to include a left turn lane into the southern entrance and McGlynn Road. Staff will work with MNDOT with regards to the signal timing at Highway 5 and Audubon Road. Comment from MNDOT has not been received at this time, therefore any approvals shall be subject to MNDOT's conditions. Parking Analysis and Site Plan The SRF study included a site plan with proposed parking as shown in Figures 5 and 6 of this report. The site currently has 165 parking spaces: 105 spaces within the northern parking lot (currently only accessible by the northern access) 42 spaces within the southern parking lot (currently only accessible by the southern access) 18 spaces within an underground parking garage Based on the Paisley Park proposal for 65 guests per tour, tours departing every 10 minutes, and limiting the time guests stay SRF determined that 230 spaces are required to accommodate on- site parking for all guests. Due to the timing of Paisley Park's application and the impending end Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 12 of 18 to the 2016 construction season construction of the parking expansion this year is not feasible. The following scenarios summarize the options available to operate tours of Paisley Park: SCENARIO 1: Shuttle bus only for guests • This option would allow Paisley Park to operate tours with no improvements required to the Highway 5 signal system or Audubon Road. • Minor site improvements would likely be necessary to accommodate the turning movements of the busses. • The tour size would be limited by the maximum occupancy per the Fire Code. SCENARIO 2. On-site guest parking allowed no site improvements • Audubon Road would be striped to include a left tum lane. • The number of on-site parking spaces for guests who arrive by a personal vehicle is limited to 105 spaces. SCENARIO 3: On-site guest parking allowed connect the north and south lots • A paved aisle would connect the north and south parking areas. • Audubon Road would be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access. • All appropriate permits- for example with Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District- must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. • Sidewalks installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance. • The north access would be limited to a right -out of the site. • The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study. • The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. SCENARIO 4: On-site guest parking allowed connect the north and south lots expand parking • The northern access would be converted to right -out only. • The northern and southern parking spaces would be connected. • The parking lot would be expanded to include 230 spaces. • Sidewalks installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance. • Audubon Road would be restriped for left turn lanes for north- and south -bound traffic at McGlynn Road. • The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study. • The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 13 of 18 There are many variables and discussion points associated with the parking and site plan that are best explained by stating the assumptions of the Paisley Park Business Plan and the SRF traffic study, concerns, options to address the concerns and the limiting factors of the options. Assumption Concern Potential Result Options Limiting Factors Guests arrive no earlier than Guests will not 30 minutes adhere to the prior to tour requirement Tickets state it is a self -guided tour; some Offsite The maximum patrons may take parking and shuttle to impervious Len of the longer than 70 the site surface touris170 minutes Additional parking allowed for the minutes that was not Include site is 70%, Facility adds accounted for in the which limits more rooms to study conditions the amount of the tour, the PUD surface increasing the approval parking on the len of the tour ongoing requiring ongoing site. Guests will stay Guests must longer to enjoy monitoring leave within 45 the food, of and minutes of the shopping and performance end of the tour ambiance of standards Paisley Park for parking Pedestrian traffic to Guests will Some guests park the site. Currently park on-site off-site and walk there is no trail or to the site sidewalk to Paisley Park The parking will be monitored to determine the adequacy of the on-site parking. If at any time the Community Development Director or Fire Code deems that the on-site parking is inadequate the PUD shall be amended to decrease the maximum allowable tour size to a level where the on- site parking is sufficient, or the property owner must amend the PUD and the site plan to provide more parking. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the city and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. The applicant must submit a $20,000 escrow or letter of credit as a financial security to ensure the installation of the required improvements. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 14 of 18 The applicant shall submit engineered site plan drawings for review and approval. The site plan drawings must meet or exceed the requirements set forth in the Chanhassen City Code and the Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The site plan shall also meet or exceed the requirements of agencies that have jurisdiction over the site, such as MNDOT and Riley - Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District. Recommendation The Engineering Department recommended conditions for approval of the Paisley Park PUD and site plan are as follows: 1. Prior to any site disturbance a grading plan must be submitted for review and approval. 2. If the MCES determines that the conversion to a museum results in additional SAC units, City SAC and Water Access Charges (WAC) and the MCES SAC charges must be paid. 3. Future surface improvements such as driveway and parking lot expansion will require storm system improvements such as storm sewer installation and best management practices as required by the city and the watershed district. 4. If guests arrive to the site by a shuttle bus only, then tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy per the Fire Code. 5. If guests utilize the parking that is on-site as of September 15, 2016 (ie. no site improvements are installed): a. Audubon Road would be striped to include a left tum lane, and b. The number of on-site parking spaces for guests who arrive by a personal vehicle is limited to 105 spaces. 6. If guests utilize the parking that is on-site as of September 15, 2016 and pave a connection between the north and south lots: a. All appropriate permits- for example with Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District- must be obtained prior to installing the pavement, b. Sidewalks must be installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance, c. The north access shall be limited to a right -out of the site, d. By 8 am local time, October 5, 2016, Audubon Road must be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access, e. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study, and f. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. 7. If guests park on-site and site improvements include expanding the parking area to 230 spaces and connecting the north and south parking lots a. The northern access shall be right -out only, Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 15 of 18 b. Sidewalks must be installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance, c. By 8 am local time, October 5, 2016, Audubon Road shall be restriped for left tum lanes for north- and south -bound traffic at McGlynn Road, d. By 8 am local time, October 5, 2016, the traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study, and e. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. 8. If at any time the Community Development Director or Fire Code deems that the on-site parking is inadequate the PUD shall be amended to decrease the maximum allowable tour size to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the property owner must amend the PUD and the site plan to provide more parking. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the city and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. 9. The applicant must submit a $20,000 escrow or letter of credit as a financial security to ensure the installation of the required improvements. 10. The applicant shall submit engineered site plan drawings for review and approval. The site plan drawings must meet or exceed the requirements set forth in the Chanhassen City Code and the Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The site plan shall also meet or exceed the requirements of agencies that have jurisdiction over the site, such as MNDOT and Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District. Stormwater When a full site plan is submitted it will be review the proposed alterations and comment accordingly. The site plan must comply with Article VII of Chapter 19. In addition, the site will be governed by the requirements of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. Landscaping Landscape Requirements Minimum requirements for landscaping include 1,140 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot expansion, 4 trees and 2 landscape islands or peninsulas for the expanded parking area Applicant's proposed landscaping as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 16 of 18 Required Pro sed Vehicular use landscape area 1,140 sq. ft. 0 sq. R. Trees/ parking lot 4 overstory 0 overstory 2 islands or peninsulas 0 islands/peninsulas The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for landscaping. Recommendations: 1. The applicant shall submit a parking lot landscape plan for approval that meets minimum ordinance requirements. 2. The applicant shall increase landscaping in existing parking area to meet minimum ordinance requirements: 2,280 sq. ft. of landscape area, 9 trees and 4 islands or peninsulas. Building review The proposed future uses of the existing structure(s), as outlined in the provided documents, would necessitate a change in Occupancy Classification under the Minnesota State Building Code. (The "Paisley Park" building has a Certificate of Occupancy for `B", "S-1" occupancies only. The "exterior round building" was never completed and has no Certificate.) The existing building must be compliant (or be made compliant) with the requirements of the Occupancy Classification of these proposed uses: Museum (A-3 Occupancy), Food and Drink (A-2 Occupancy), Retail sales (M Occupancy), Recording studio (B Occupancy), Concert usage (A-1 Occupancy) and Storage (S-1 Occupancy). (Ref. 2015 MSBC, Chapter 3) 1. Permits must be obtained for the alteration of or occupancy use changes to any buildings on the site. (Ref. MN Rule 1300.0120) 2. Supporting documents (plans, specifications, etc.) must be prepared by and signed by the appropriate design professionals. (Ref. MN Rule 1300.0130) 3. Existing structure's physical plant (plumbing, HVAC, electrical, fire suppression, fire -rated separations, etc.) must be evaluated and approved as functioning as required by the various proposed Occupancies. 4. A new Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained before use or occupancy. (Ref. MN Rule 1300.0220) 5. A "Sewer Access Charge" redetermination is required (Metropolitan Council). 6. The "studio building" project was stopped (by the owner) sometime in 2002 and the permit subsequently expired. The building is incomplete and has no Certificate of Occupancy, therefore, cannot be used for any purpose. A new building permit must be applied for (including all related documentation) and approved for construction to re- commence. A letter advising of the expiration of the permit was sent to the contractor (Rutledge Const.) and to Fred Evans (Paisley Park Enterprises) in February of 2003. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 17 of 18 7. Accessible parking is required; the number of required accessible parking spaces is determined by the Minnesota State Accessibility Code, Table 1106.1 (based on the total number of provided spaces, parking plan required). Fire Review Some consideration needs to be given to an alternative use of a concert hall which I will cover later in this document. Parking Plan Regardless of approved use, a minimum of a 20' access to areas of any part of the building must be maintained to allow emergency vehicle access and egress during hours of operation. I am not concerned about out lots at this point. A proposed site plan, to include actual parking areas, should be provided so the Fire Code can indicate fire lanes etc. Building Use In the planned use they loosely imply that the use could be as a concert hall. Historically, these concerts have been scheduled with no notice and no access. The major issue relates to the open configuration of the main sound stage. The configuration has changed dramatically and involves temporary seating. Consideration should be given to; Either require a special event permit for any event that would involve the concert use of this property to ensure appropriate stage and seating configurations, parking, are reviewed and approved by the building official, fire department, and planning department. Or; Create a fixed seating and stage arrangement utilizing an appropriate architect negating the need for permit requirements unless a deviation from the approved plans is necessary. Approved occupancy would be based on the arrangement and approved by the building official. Fire Inspections The last on-site fire inspection was conducted in 2015. I have been working with Bremer Bank representatives to correct several open violations from that inspection. It should be noted that none of the open violations are of a serious nature. The most serious relates to off hours' access to the building which is currently being worked on with an outside contractor. Prior to opening, and pending planning approval, the building will need a complete fire inspection based on the new building classification. That inspection can be conducted as soon as possible and should not dramatically change any requirements already existing for the current building classification as a B Occupancy. This inspection will also identify any work done to remedy open violations from the 2015 inspection. Storage Area Within the planned use, the document refers to a storage area. I am confused if this is indoors or outdoors. The document eludes that vehicles, including a bus, may be stored for display. I am Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 18 of 18 also to understand that the viewing areas are all on the main level leading me to believe that this does not include the parking garage specifically designed for parking vehicles. If the plan is to park vehicles indoors for viewing, a fire protection engineer should review and approve the site plan ensuring the current suppression system can cover the fire load increase created by the vehicles. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motions: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11 Block 1 Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance and Finding of Fact. ATTACHMENTS I . Findings of Fact 2. PUD Ordinance 3. Development Review Application 4. Business Plan 5. Chanhassen City Code, Chapter 20 — Article =1. - "IOP" Industrial Office Park District 6. Traffic Study SRF dated September 12, 2016 7. Affidavit of Mailing Notice of Public Hearing. 8. Emails from residents: a. Email from Jennifer Singer b. Email from Kristi Strang c. Email from Lynne Etling d. Email from Susan Davis e. Email from John Sparrow f. Email from Stephanie Friant g. Email and memo from Wendy OConnor 9:\plan\2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museum\pc staff reportdoc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Request for a rezoning of property legally described as within Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park. — Planning Case No.2016-24 Application of PRN Music Corporation. On September 20, 2016, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of PRN Music Corporation to rezone property from IOP -Industrial Office Park to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned IOP -Industrial Office Park. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial. 3. The description of the property is: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The planning report #2016-24, dated September 20, 2016, prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al is incorporated herein. RECOM111lENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20'b day of September 2016. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION M Its Chairman GAPLAN\2016 Planning Cases12016-24 Paisley Park Muse Tindings of Fact.doc AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following -described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, Minnesota Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District sh�11 apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted: "da:l g studio. ry1v J sales of products stored or ufactured on the s' ovided no an twenty percent (20%) of the floor space is us or retail sales. These sales may include fQod, beverages and memorabilia. T eve (12) indoor concerts per calendar lvtpitiplebuildings on a lot. dCCu �0 t c. .Ptohibited ses. a following uses are prohibited:(��j d. 1s90swA All uses not listed as permitted uses. Outdoor events. 3. sales and consumption. Materials and Design 01 �Ik Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. PAN e. Parking Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. If guests use on-site parking and the north and south parking lots are not connected: a. Audubon Road must first be restriped to include a left tum lane, b. The number of on-site parking spaces for guests who arrive by a personal vehicle is limited to 105 spaces. 4. If guests use on-site parking and a connection between the north and south lots is paved: a. Audubon Road must first be striped to include a left tum lane into the southern access, b. All required permits, including from the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement, C. The north access shall be limited to a right -out of the site, e. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must first be optimized based on the SRF study, f. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. If guests park on-site and site improvements include expanding the parking area to 230 spaces and connecting the north and south parking lots: a. Audubon Road shall first be restriped for left tum lanes for northbound and southbound traffic at McGlynn Road, b. The northern access shall be right -out only, C. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must first be optimized based on the SRF study, d. Sidewalks must be installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance, e. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. 6. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. 2 189087v1 Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of 2016, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) isvos7A '?At-aY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHANHASSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone '(952)227-1300/Fax. (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR „ '' ' 1 ' DEVELOPMENT REVIEW �/1 7 — �.abmatal Data _ K 2 j -PC Date: _ CC Dah:. ' W -Day Review Date. r J 03 I� _ (Falai to the appropriate Application Checkgst for required submitral mkrmation that must acroWa,ty this appikilarr) Ij Comprehensive Plan Amendment ........................ $600 E Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers..... 5100 FI Conditional Use Permit (CUP) [1 Single-FamtyResidence ...... _.._ ....................$325 LIAll Others........................................................ $425 [ I Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In cunjuncbon with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others ... ........ ................. .._........................$425 LJ Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 11 All Others .. .... ............ ......... ............................. $500 [J Sign Plan Review..... ....................... ................ ..... $150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) F1 Administrative................................................. $100 Ll Commercialllndustrial Districts' _ .................I. $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: t thousand square feet) Ir_lude iusnbei of "qsLqV employees: in,kidc mariber ofrren employcas: _ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( units) ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Create 3 lots ui less ........................................ _3Oo ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot ❑ t_ lots) $200 ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots) .... ................. ............ �3t10 ❑ Consolidate Lots ................. _........................)� 1 so F I Lot Line Adjustment ..................................... 5150 ❑Final Plat .................................................... -700 ❑ (Includes $450 escrow for attorney vests)' S500 HM: When multiple applieatterrs are proearesed eoneurrantly, 'Ackfitj al escrow may b required for olhui :,pplicati,,r through the &velormtent canis j ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording te,s may apply) ❑ Variance (VAR) ........................ ..... ......... ..... ...... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Lj Single -Family Residence ........................... _. $150 ❑ Ali Others ........ ..................... _......_..... ... ._$275 ❑ Zoning Appeal.... _..................... ....... ,.................. $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment tZOA). __......_.. S500 HM: When multiple applieatterrs are proearesed eoneurrantly, the appropriate fee shall be Charged for each application. Notification Sign (Cay to mstaa and r move)............................................................................................................... Y2u0 Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate adcrb A3 - s�.. $3 per address rxo apgication rneeling) ........................................... (j.L addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)._ ................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements I._ easements) C TOTAL FEE: Sly 0 l Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal Museum at Paisley Park, 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen. MN 55317 Properly Address or Location' _ Parcel #: 25.1900110 Legal Description. 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN 55317 See attached. Iota] Acreage: 9.01 _ Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No Present Zoning: Industrial Office Park District (IOP) Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD)_ Present Land Use Designation: Office/Industrial Requested Land Use Designation: Office/Industrial Existing Use of Property: Recording studio, soundstage, performance hall. office and warehouse/storage 0 Check box is separate narrative is attached. M Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information 1 APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained i authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. if this application has not been signed by the property ownr:r, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application ' should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies etc, with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name -- N/A _ — Contact: Address: _-- ---- _ Phone: cry/StafelLip: ---- Cell: ------ — -- Email: Signature: Date: i PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of Ihp, deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. 1 further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees. feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name, PRN Music Corporation, Go Bremer Trust, N.A. Contact: Alison A. Hauck Address: 1100 West St. Germain Street Phone (320) 258-2448 City/StalelZip: Saint Cloud, MN 56302 Cell: (320) 260-1722 — -- i Email: _— _ AAHauck@Bremeccom Fax: _ _ (320) 259-9120 Signature: ( �tE''GnErf-- – --- Date: 8/19/16 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application. refer to the appropriate Application Cheddist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Contact: Matt Pacyna, PE Address: One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 Phone, (763) 249-6726 — City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 554474443 Cell: (612) 382-2546 Email: mpacyna@srfconsufting.com Fax. (763) 475-2429 Section 4; Notification information Who should receive copies of staff reports? "Other Contact Information: n Property Owner Via: U Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: Stinson Leonard Street LLP, c/o Todd M. Phelps [] Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mated Paper Copy Address: 150 South Fifth St., Suite 2300 [] Fngine-er Via: 0 Email ❑ Mated Paper Copy City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55402 U Other' Via: .Q Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: todd.phelpsr(Mstinson.com INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save n copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM. to send a digital copy to the city for processing (required). [!ALE T FORM SuaMR FORM -I S STINSON LEONARD STREET August 19, 2016 HAND DELIVERED Kathryn R. Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 G1TY OF CHANHASSEFt RECEIVED r,l '016 G'HANHASSEN PLANMlA IIFP f: Todd M. Phelps 612.335.1871 DIRECT 612.335.1657 DIRECT FAX todd.phelps"nson.com Re: Application for Development Review -7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN. Our File No: 3009435.0002 Dear Ms. Aanenson: This letter is submitted on behalf of Bremer Trust, National Association (the 7special Administrator'), the court-appointed Special Administrator of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson (the "Estate"), in support of the enclosed Application for Development Review (the "Aoolication") for the real property and improvements owned by the Estate located at 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota, legally described as Lot 11, Block I, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part of said Lot 11, shown as Parcel 220 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-1 (the "Property'). Enclosed please find the following: 1. The Application to rezone the Property from Industrial Office Park District (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). 2. A check in the amount of $750.00, payable to the City of Chanhassen. 3. The Paisley Park Museum Business Plan, which sets forth in greater detail the proposed use of the Property as a museum to honor the late Prince Rogers Nelson. In further support of the enclosed Application, the Special Administrator submits the following Pursuant to Article VIII "Planned Unit Development District" of the City of Chanhassen Zoning Code: Sec. 20-501. Intent. The rezoning of the Property from IOP to PUD for use as a museum is supported by the intent of the PUD zoning for a number of reasons. First, the use of the Property as a museum preserves the unique recording studios, soundstage, performance hall, and artwork that was created in the City of Chanhassen over a 30 -year period by a world - 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET, SUITE 2300 • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 www.stinsonleonard.tom 612.335.1500 MAIN • 612.335.1657 FAX CORFJ3009435.00021129640409.1 August 19, 2016 Page 2 renowned artist, who sold over 100 million records, won seven Grammy Awards, a Golden Globe Award, and an Academy Award for the film "Purple Rain," all of which are displayed at the Property. Second, the PUD zoning will offer enhanced flexibility for the Property to allow for the museum, continued use of the recording studios, soundstage, performance hall, offices and warehouse/storage, as well as for limited food service and merchandise sales, as further described in the Business Plan. Third, the PUD zoning is consistent with the City of Chanhassen 2030 Land Use Plan, which designates the Property as Office/Industrial. Under Section 20-792 of the Code, museums are a permitted use in the "Of' Office and Institutional District. Sec. 20-502. Allowed Uses. The primary use of the Property will be as a museum. However, as further described in the Business Plan, we anticipate that the Property will continue to be used as a recording studio, soundstage, and performance hall. Additionally, limited food service and merchandise sales will be uses ancillary to the museum use. Sec. 20.503. District Size and Location. The Property is approximately 9.01 acres and thus meets the minimum sae requirements under the Code. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration of the Special Administrator's Application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (612) 335-1871. Sincerely, STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP ALI / " � Tod6 M. Phelps TMP/jl CORF/3009435.0002/128640409.1 PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM BUSINESS PLAN August 19, 2016 Bremer Trust, National Association, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate a museum at Paisley Park, 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN, the former recording studio of Prince Rogers Nelson. The family of Prince is supportive of operating Paisley Park as a museum and believes that this is what Prince would have wanted for all of his fans. Paisley Park Facility has entered into an Exhibition Operating Agreement, with PP Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Graceland Holdings, LLC to operate the Exhibition. The management team of Graceland Holdings, LLC has been involved in the operations of Graceland in Memphis, Tennessee since 1982. Graceland has over 30 years of experience, having handled in excess of 20 million visitors and 8 million vehicles during that time, including all aspects related to traffic and attendance management, ticket control, security, retail and food and beverage service as part of Graceland and operating a similar museum facility and tours. Graceland's experienced management team will be providing development, management, and oversight of all aspects of the museum at Paisley Park. In recent years, Graceland has over 600,000 guests per year, while maintaining an amicable relationship with the City of Memphis and neighbors of Graceland. Graceland is in the process of expanding its operations to include operation of a hotel complex a few blocks from the Graceland mansion which is scheduled to open in October 2016 and also opening up a World's Fair entertainment complex across the street from the Graceland mansion which is scheduled to be open in March 2017. Graceland Holdings is highly committed to this project and making it success for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson as well as the local and broader Twin Cities community. Toward that end Graceland is providing the initial funds for capital improvement and initial operating costs of the museum. The following is the proposed business plan for the Paisley Park museum operations: Building Construction — We do not anticipate any exterior construction at the site, other than items related to the parking lot. In terms of interior construction, we anticipate widening doorways, adding lighting, motion detectors, and sound systems in areas of the facility. We will also be completing various improvements required for fire safety purposes. As previously reviewed with the City of Chanhassen, we will also be replacing the existing chiller/boiler at the facility. Operations — We plan to open the Museum in early October (subject to obtaining all approvals required by the City of Chanhassen). The family of Prince Rogers Nelson has an Official Family Tribute Concert scheduled for Thursday, October 13th at U.S. Bank Stadium, and the plan is to have the Museum open in advance of that so that out of town visitors and others that attend the Tribute Concert will also be able to complete a tour of Paisley Park. We anticipate operating the Museum from 10 am to 10 pm during the week and from 9 am to midnight on weekends, although we will vary these hours based on ticket demands and may have less hours during the week or in winter months. At this time, it is difficult for us to predict peak hours, but we anticipate heavier traffic in evenings and weekends. 128637840.2 Tickets to the Museum will be sold only online and will not be able to be purchased at the site. We will not permit any walk-up entry. Tickets will be for a specific time tour and guests will be permitted to park and enter Paisley Park only 20-30 minutes early. This time frame and limited access will be strongly emphasized in ticketing and repeated messaging to guests. The length of the tour will be approximately 70 minutes and guests will be required to exit within 30-45 minutes after the conclusion of their tour. The maximum guest stay during peak times will be 2 hours. Tours will be guided tours and will start in 10 minute increments and each tour is expected to include 25-30 guests. We anticipate a total of 1500 to 2000 guests per day on peak days. Ticket prices will be $38.50 for standard tickets. A VIP Tour experience will also be offered for smaller guests groups with prices of $100 or more. Guided tours will take guests through the recording and mixing studios, video editing rooms, rehearsal rooms, Prince's private NPG Music Club, and the soundstage and performance hall. The tour will be contained to the main floor of the facility and will be indoors, except for an exit from the performance hall to the storage garage where cars and the tour bus will be able to be viewed. We will add a tent to the breezeway passage from the performance hall to the storage garage. We anticipate employing 20 to 60 people from the local area during the museum's operating hours. This amount will vary based on the tour volumes and times. We will also be engaging a substantial number of local contractors and service providers to ready the facility for operations by early October. Traffic/Parking c/Parking _ The facility currently includes approximately 90 parking spaces in its front parking area. We plan to further expand the parking area to the east to add an additional 40-50 spots. In addition, because we will be utilizing parking attendants we would anticipate being able to "double-park" cars based on knowing what times people will be exiting the facility and can utilize an additional 28-30 spots based on this method of parking. This will result in total parking of approximately 160 spaces. Based on Graceland's experience, we estimate that there will be 2.5 guests per vehicle, which based on the anticipated attendance and tour times equals 60 vehicles per hour and a maximum of 150 vehicles parked at any given time given the ticketed tour windows and a maximum guest stay of 2.0 hours in peak time periods. As noted below, we also anticipate as many as 20% of guests being shuttled from other locations particularly during peak hours. We will expand the front gate area to include a coned cul-de-sac area so that cars can easily exit from Audubon Road. We will have parking attendants that will immediately review parking tickets and time windows to confirm if a vehicle can enter the parking lot. If a guest's allotted time period has not yet arrived, the attendant will direct the car to exit the cul-de-sac and return during the ticketed time period. The attendants will also be patrolling the exterior fence and Audubon Road to prevent any cars from stopping along the road or otherwise causing traffic congestion. We will have parking attendants that will direct parking. We will be adding lighting to the parking lot to the extent there is not sufficient lighting currently there. In the future, we may utilize land across Audubon Road for additional parking. 128637840.2 2 A traffic study related to the facility is being prepared and will be submitted to the Planning Commission. On our current estimates, the traffic volumes will be less than the volume of cars entering the nearby General Mills facility based on observed traffic study there. We expect to utilize the back parking lot and garage for employees of the facility to park and will also utilize off-site shuttle and parking for employees. We are also making arrangements with bus companies to conduct shuttle trips from the airport and/or the Mall of America area. Security — The Museum will have 240 security. We will install a new security system. The Museum will hire security guards and supervisors for its operations. Food & Drink — The Museum will offer food and beverage at the conclusion of the tour. There will be no alcoholic beverages sold or permitted to be consumed at the facility. The food is anticipated to be a limited item of vegetarian items including a tasting plate, dessert, and select sandwiches. We are interviewing vendors to provide the food and anticipate that while some food would be prepared offsite and delivered daily that there would be set"rtions of the menu that would be prepared on site. Thi -Museum anticipates erecting a tent connected (or semi -attached) to the exit near the restrooms in a portion of the exterior parking area where guests could sit for a brief period to eat upon conclusion of the tour. (See attached exterior map). There will be no smoking permitted at the facility. -- Merchandise — The Museum will include sales of merchandise on-site including apparel, guidebooks and other souvenirs. Other Events — Paisley Park will continue to be utilized as a recording studio for special sessions. In addition, we anticipate that concerts will also continue to be held in the performance hall. There would be no events outside. No events are anticipated to be held until at least March 2017 and no arrangements or bookings have been made related to future events. We anticipate that such events will be held on Friday or Saturday weekend and that offsite parking arrangements will be made. Based on square footage of the performance hall the attendees at events could be UP t0.150o people at one time. Studio and concert usage of the facility will be limited in order to avoid interfering with tour attendance. Future Activities — While future plans have not been developed, some of the additional potential uses or ancillary operations for Paisley Park include additional parking and potential development and completion of the exterior round building. We may also develop onsite limited occupancy lodging in the future. 1286378402 See Attached Facility Map 4 128637640.2 proposed lot extension Attachment #5 ARTICLE XXII. - "IOP" INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT Sec. 20-811. - Intent. The intent of the "IOP" district is to provide an area identified for large-scale light industrial and commercial planned development. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-1), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-812. - Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in an "IOP" district: (1) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (2) Automotive repair shops. (3) Conference/convention centers. (4) Health services. (5) Indoor health and recreation clubs. (6) Light industrial. (7) Offices. (8) Off -premises parking lots. (9) Print shops. (10)Recording studios. (11) Utility services. (12) Vocational school. (13) Warehouses. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-2),12-15-86; Ord. No. 240, § 21, 7-25-95; Ord. No. 259, § 27, 11-12-96; Ord. No. 377, § 109,5-24-04) Sec. 20-813. - Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in an "IOP" district: (1) Automotive repair shop. (2) Day care center. (3) Parking lots and ramps. - (4) Signs. �1 Page 1 Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for retail sales. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-3), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 93, § 1, 7-25-88; Ord. No. 377, § 110, 5- 24-04) Sec. 20-814. - Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in an "IOP" district: (1) Contracting yards. (2) Day care centers as part of a multi -tenant building. (3) Day care centers as a separate facility. (4) Food processing. (5) Gun range, indoor. (6) Home improvement trades. (7) Hotels and motels. (8) Lumber yards. (9) Motor freight terminals. (10)Outdoor health and recreation clubs. (11) Screened outdoor storage. (12) Research laboratories. (13)Reserved. (14) Commercial towers as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (15)Electrical distribution and underground electric distribution substations. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-4),12-15-86; Ord. No. 97, § 1, 10-24-88; Ord. No. 120, § 4(12), 2-12-90; Ord. No. 259, § 28, 11-12-96; Ord. No. 377, § 111, 5-24-04; Ord. No. 390, § 5, 3-14- 05; Ord. No. 527, § 4, 8-22-11) State Law reference— Conditional uses, M.S. § 462.3595. Sec. 20-815. - Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "IOP" district subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum lot area is one acre. (2) The minimum lot frontage is 150 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall have a minimum frontage of 60 feet. Page 2 (3) The minimum lot depth is 200 feet. (4) The maximum lot coverage is 70 percent. (5) Off-street parking shall comply with district setback requirements except: a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad right-of-way, except as provided in chapter 20, article XXV, division 3, pertaining to landscaping requirements. b. There is no minimum setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. c. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. d. The minimum setback is 25 feet for side street side yards. e. Parking setbacks along public rights-of-way may be reduced to a minimum of ten feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that 100 percent screening is provided at least five feet above the adjacent parking lot. The intent of this section is that the city is willing to trade a reduced setback for additional landscaping that is both an effective screen and of high quality aesthetically. Acceptable screening is to be comprised of berming and landscaping. Screening through the use of fencing is not permitted. (6) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, four stories/50 feet. b. For accessory structures, one story. (7) Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards, 30 feet. b. For rear yards, ten feet. c. For side yards, ten feet. d. The minimum setback is 100 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. In instances where existing topography and/or vegetation provide buffering satisfactory to the city, or where quality site planning is achieved, the city may reduce setback requirements by up to 50 percent. The applicant shall have the full burden of demonstrating that there is sufficient separation and screening for the higher intensity use. e. Buffer yards. The city comprehensive plan establishes a requirement for buffer yards. Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density uses and shall comply with chapter 20, article XXV, of the Chanhassen City Code. Page 3 2. The buffer yard is not an additional setback requirement. The full obligation to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use. 3. The buffer yard is intended to provide physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use. As such, they will be required to be provided with a combination of berming, landscaping and/or tree preservation to maximize the buffering potential. To the extent deemed feasible by the city, new plantings shall be designed to require the minimum of maintenance, however, such maintenance as may be required to maintain consistency with the approved plan, shall be the obligation of the property owner. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 94, §§ 1, 7, 7-25-88; Ord. No. 136, §§ IA, 1B, 1-28-91; Ord. No. 451, § 8, 5-29-07; Ord. No. 474, §§ 14,15,10-13-08) Sec. 20-816. - Interim uses. The following are interum uses in the "IOP" district: (1) Churches. (2) Concrete mixing plants. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90) Secs. 20-817-20-900. - Reserved. gAplan\2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museum\sec._20_812._permitted_uses..docx Page 4 wtu I E NGI NEI RS P FA NN FR5 D F 5 1 G N F R 5 consulting Group, Inc. To: Paul Oehme, PE Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Chanhassen From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Tom Sachi, EIT, Engineer Date: September 12, 2016 Subject: 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Introduction Draft Memorandum SRFNR. 0169371 SRF has completed a traffic and parking study for the proposed Paisley Park Museum at 7801 Audubon Road in the City of Chanhassen (see Figure 1: Project Location). The main objectives of this study are to review existing operations within the study area, evaluate traffic and parking impacts of the proposed development, and recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development A review of the proposed access, circulation, and overall site operations was also completed. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations offered for consideration. Existing Conditions The existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline in order to identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes intersection turning movement counts, field observations, and an intersection capacity analysis. Data Collection Intersection turning movement counts were collected at the following locations between Thursday, August 25 and Sunday, August 28, 2016. e Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 e Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard e Audubon Road and Park Road These periods were selected as they include the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, as well as the Saturday midday peak period. Supplemental traffic counts were collected along Audubon Road on Saturday, September 3, 2016 to understand impacts associated with the adjacent AutoMotorPlex facility, which holds a Saturday event between 8 a.m. and 11 a.m. once a month. Annual average daily traffic (ADT) volumes within the study area, as well as historical MN Highway 5 turning movement counts from 2013 were provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 1 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 1 763.475.0010 1 W W WSRFCONSULTING.COM I/ E manp 4' ect- ocatio' •, � , Y Coulter t3oulev.-ud a . "a veep Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen September 12, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Panting Study A summary of the traffic volumes collected are illustrated in Chart 1. Review of the data collected indicates that traffic volumes along MN Highway 5 generally peak during the weekday a.m. (7:45 to 8:45) and p.m. (4:30 to 5:30) time periods. Traffic volumes along Audubon Road also generally peak during the same time periods, albeit at much lower levels. On Saturday, traffic volumes along MN Highway 5 peak during the midday (11:45 to 12:45), while volumes along Audubon Road remain relatively steady throughout the day. It should be noted that there is a noticeable traffic volume peak along Audubon Road that coincides with a Saturday AutoMotorPlex event Chart 1 Existing Traffic Volume Profiles 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 —9 Weekday: Highway 5 t Weekday: Audubon Road ---*— Saturday: Highway 5 —41— Satuday: Audubon Road ....)*••• Saturday (Car Show): Audubon Road � e� e Q� Q� e0� 9� �0� 11cfl 1ryoo ti o '(Z"�o po 5°o eoo ^oo Time of Day Observations were completed to identify roadway characteristics (i.e. roadway geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls) within the study area. MN Highway 5 is a four -lane divided roadway with left- and right -turn lanes at Audubon Road. The posted speed limit along MN Highway 5 is 55 miles per hour (mph). Audubon Road, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road are two-lane undivided roadways. The posted speed limit along Audubon Road is 45 mph while the remaining study roadways are posted at 30 mph. The Audubon Road/MN Highway 5 intersection is signalized. All other study intersections are unsignalized with side -street stop controL Mcglynn Road and the existing Paisley Park access locations were not reviewed as part of the existing conditions due to limited activity. Existing study area geometrics, traffic controls, and traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Page 3 W;,� Existing Conditions Figure 2 CoruWtlng 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study 00169371 City of Chanhassen September 2016 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Intersection Capacity Analysis September 12, 2016 An existing intersection capacity analysis was completed for the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations can be compared. The weekday a.m. peak hour was not reviewed since the proposed development is expected to have minimal impact during that time. Saturday event conditions at the AutoMotorPlex were not reviewed given the limited impact. Intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic (Version 9). Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS), which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 1. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles experiencing minimal delays. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. Overall intersection LOS A through LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities. Table 1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections LOS Designation Signalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) A < 10 <_ 10 8 > 10-20 > 10-15 C >20-35 >15-25 D >35-55 >25-35 E > 55 - 80 > 35 - 50 F > 80 > 50 For side -street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side -street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side -street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high levels of delay (i.e. poor levels of service) on the side -street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 2 indicate that the study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the existing geometric layout and traffic controls. Side -street delays along Audubon Road are relatively minimal. However, northbound queues Tong Audubon Road extend beyond the existing Paisley Park North Access approximately 50 percent of the weekday p.m. peak hour (^-185 feet). The 95th percentile westbound left -turning queues along MN Highway 5 during the weekday p.m. peak hour extend approximately 160 feet. Page 5 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection September 12, 2016 Weekday P.M. I Saturday Midday (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Proposed Development The proposed development is expected to convert Paisley Park Studios into a Museum. Opening is currently planned for October 2016. Based on discussion with project stakeholders, the following information with respect to the Museum operation was assumed: • Hours of Operation: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. • Days of Operation: Everyday (except Thanksgiving and Christmas) • Maximum Guests per Tour: 65 people (50 General Admission; 15 VIP) • Tour Start Times: Every 10 minutes • Tour Duration: General Admission - 70 minutes; VIP - 100 minutes • Employees: Up to 60 but no more than 20 on-site at any given time (except special events) • Existing Parking Spaces: — 165 spaces (105 North; 42 South; 18 Garage) The two existing Paisley Park access locations along Audubon Road are expected to remain. The Paisley Park South Access, located across from Mcglynn Road and approximately 500 south of MN Highway 5, would serve as the employee entrance. The Paisley Park North Access, located approximately 125 feet south of MN Highway 5, would serve as the guest entrance. The guest entrance would be staffed at all times to manage/control access to the site. Existing + Museum Conditions To identify potential impacts associated with the proposed museum, traffic forecasts were developed for year of opening conditions. Since the museum is planning to open in October 2016, existing conditions with the addition of the proposed museum were reviewed. Therefore, the following sections provide details on the estimated trip generation and intersection capacity analysis. Trip Generation To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, a trip generation estimate for the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours as well as on a weekday daily basis was developed. Given the unique land use, data provided by project staff was utilized. For purposes of this study, a worst-case approach was assumed in which full capacity tours (65 guests) at the museum would occur starting every 10 minutes throughout the peak periods of the adjacent roadway. Page 6 LOS Delay LOS Delay Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 B 17 sec. B 12 sec. Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard (1) A/B 12 sec. A/B 10 sec. Audubon Road and Park Road (1) A/B 11 sec. A/A 9 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Proposed Development The proposed development is expected to convert Paisley Park Studios into a Museum. Opening is currently planned for October 2016. Based on discussion with project stakeholders, the following information with respect to the Museum operation was assumed: • Hours of Operation: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. • Days of Operation: Everyday (except Thanksgiving and Christmas) • Maximum Guests per Tour: 65 people (50 General Admission; 15 VIP) • Tour Start Times: Every 10 minutes • Tour Duration: General Admission - 70 minutes; VIP - 100 minutes • Employees: Up to 60 but no more than 20 on-site at any given time (except special events) • Existing Parking Spaces: — 165 spaces (105 North; 42 South; 18 Garage) The two existing Paisley Park access locations along Audubon Road are expected to remain. The Paisley Park South Access, located across from Mcglynn Road and approximately 500 south of MN Highway 5, would serve as the employee entrance. The Paisley Park North Access, located approximately 125 feet south of MN Highway 5, would serve as the guest entrance. The guest entrance would be staffed at all times to manage/control access to the site. Existing + Museum Conditions To identify potential impacts associated with the proposed museum, traffic forecasts were developed for year of opening conditions. Since the museum is planning to open in October 2016, existing conditions with the addition of the proposed museum were reviewed. Therefore, the following sections provide details on the estimated trip generation and intersection capacity analysis. Trip Generation To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, a trip generation estimate for the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours as well as on a weekday daily basis was developed. Given the unique land use, data provided by project staff was utilized. For purposes of this study, a worst-case approach was assumed in which full capacity tours (65 guests) at the museum would occur starting every 10 minutes throughout the peak periods of the adjacent roadway. Page 6 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study September 12, 2016 The average vehicle occupancy was assum to beL2.5guests p ve i le. All employees were assumed to arrive and/or depart outside of the peak tourmes. o shuttle service/transit reductions were included as part of the analysis, although it is reasonable to assume approximately 10 to 15 percent of guests may arrive via transit. Results of the tap generation estimate indicates the proposed development is expected to generate up to approximately 312 peak hour trips during a sold out condition. If each tout was sold out for the entire day, the site could generate up to 4,000 daily trips. Although it may be not be likely that tours are completely sold out throughout the day, it is reasonable to assume that tours may be sold out during the peak periods. Therefore, the analysis focused on the peak hours of the adjacent roadways assuming sold out tour conditions during the peak periods. Table 3 Trip Generation Estimate Sold Out Event Condition Size Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Tripe Saturday Midday Peak Hour Tripe Dans Trips In Out In Out 65 Guests per Paisley Park Museum (r) 10 -Minute Tour Start 156 156 156 156 4,000(2) (2.5 Guests/Vehicle) (1) Based on data provided by project staff. (2) Represents the maximum amount of trips expected to be generated (assumes sold -out tours throughout the day). Trips generated by the proposed development were routed throughout the study area based on the directional distribution shown in Figure 3. The distribution was developed based on a combination of data provided by project staff, existing travel patterns, and engineering judgment. The resultant year 2016 build peak hour conditions, including sold -out conditions, are shown in Figure 4. Year 2016 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine if the existing roadway network can accommodate the year 2016 build conditions, a detailed intersection capacity analysis was completed. Results of the year 2016 intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 4 indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the existing geometric layout and traffic controls. However, as westbound left -tum vehicles from MN Highway 5 access Audubon Road and eventually the Paisley Park North Access, the lack of a left -tum lane along southbound Audubon Road results in queues extending to MN Highway 5 during the weekday p.m. peak hour. These types of queues create a safety issue, as well as a reduction in the overall efficiency of the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection operations. Signal timing improvements alone would not address the operational and queuing issues associated with the proximity of the Paisley Park North Access. Therefore, relocating the Paisley Park North Access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location should be considered (Option 1). However, the best operations would occur if the Paisley Park South Access was the primary entrance/exit and the Paisley Park North Access was closed or converted to partial access (Option 2). Page 7 L1;, ■ Year 2016 Build Conditions Figure 4 Co"Ot ng G.oup, Inc,7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parldng Study 00169371 City of Chanhassen September 2016 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Table 4 Year 2016 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis September 12, 2016 Intersection Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 D 46 sec. B 17 sec. Audubon Road and Paisley Park North Access Ill A/B 13 sec. A/B 12 sec. Audubon Road and Paisley Park South Access (1) A/B 12 sec. A/B 11 sec. Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard (1) A/B 13 sec. A/B 10 sec. Audubon Road and Park Road (1) A/B 11 sec. I A/B 11 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. To determine how the study intersection would be expected to operate if the Paisley Park North Access were dosed (Option 2), another year 2016 build intersection capacity analysis was completed. This analysis assumed the traffic signal timing at the Audubon Road/MN Highway 5 intersection would be optimized, as well as restriping the segment of Audubon Road south of MN Highway 5 to include dedicated left -tum lanes at the Paisley Park South Access. Results of the year 2016 intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 5 indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the Paisley Park North Access closure, restriping along Audubon Road, and optimized signal timing. All queuing will be maintained within the existing tum lanes. Table 5 Year 2016 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis (Paisley Park North Access Closed) Intersection Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 C 22 sec. B 17 sec. Audubon Road and Paisley Park North Access (1) — — Audubon Road and Paisley Park South Access (1) A/B 13 sec. A/B 11 sec. Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard (1) A/B 12 sec. A/B 10 sec. Audubon Road and Park Road (1) A/B 11 sec. A/B 10 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify the Paisley Park North Access to ensure safe and efficient operations within the area. Therefore alternative access to the site, particularly off-site shuttle service for guests, should be considered until access to the site can be modified accordingly. Further discussion regarding access and site improvements is provided later in this document. Page 10 Paul Oebme, City of Chanbassen September 12, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Packing Study Parking Review B on a review of a cutxent site layout, it is estimated that there is a total of approximately 165 spaces on site. f these spaces, approximat 5 e in the north parking lot, are a outh parking lot, and the remaining 18 spaces are in the underground garage. With the assumptions used as part of the trip generation estimates (ie. 65 guests per 10 -minute tour, 2.5 guests per vehicle, 70 -minute tour length, and 20 staff on site), the peak on-site parking demand is estimated to be approximately 230 spaces. This accounts for guests arriving/departing at least 10 minutes before/after their respective touts. With the estimated peakg demand (230 spaces) and the existing parking supply (165 spaces), there is expected to be C05/ space parking deficit Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there mayrcot be sufficient time to relocate/modify/add parking. Therefore alternative access to the site (ie. shuttle service) or a reduction in overall tour guests (i.e. a maximum of 45 guests per tour) should be considered until adequate parking can be provided. Other Considerations In addition to the traffic and parking issues identified, the following other items are offered for consideration. An illustration of the potential access and parking modification options are shown in Figures 5 and 6. 1) Given the traffic, access, and parking challenges identified as well as the expected opening in October 2016, shuttle operations should be incorporated until adequate access and parking is provided. Potential shuttle routing is provided in Figure 7. 2) Provide adequate on-site staffing and vehicle storage to ensure queues from entering guests do not extend into Audubon Road. If adequate storage is not provided, a traffic control offices may be needed at the Audubon Road/Main Entrance. Furthermore, the addition of a northbound right -tum lane should be considered to reduce the potential for queuing issues on Audubon Road. 3) Consider the addition of pedestrian facilities (i.e. a sidewalk or trail), particularly along the east side of the site to reduce potential conflicts. Page 11 teconfiguration (Option 1) in Road Traffic and Parking Study Figure 5 ssen leconfiguration (Option 2) Figure 6 in Road Traffic and Parking Study ssen Ail _ L i ql y • 1 \y ZA i � S i shy Pt'�IL � Boulevard W;: Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Packing Study Summary and Conclusions September 12, 2016 The following study conclusions and recommendations are offered for consideration: 1) The study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Side -street delays along Audubon Road are relatively minimal. Northbound queues along Audubon Road extend beyond the existing Paisley Park North Access approximately 50 percent of the weekday p.m. peak hour (-185 feet). 2) The proposed development is expected to generate up to approximately 312 peak hour trips during a sold out condition. If each tour was sold out for the entire day, the site could generate up to 4,000 daily trips. 3) Results of the year 2016 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. However, as westbound left -turn vehicles from MN Highway 5 access Audubon Road and eventually the Paisley Park North Access, the lack of a left -turn lane along southbound Audubon Road results in queues extending to MN Highway 5 during the weekday p.m. peak hour. These types of queues create a safety issue, as well as a reduction in the overall efficiency of the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection operations. 4) Signal timing improvements alone would not address the operational and queuing issues associated with the proximity of the Paisley Park North Access. Therefore, relocating the Paisley Park North Access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location should be considered (Option 1). However, the best operations would occur if the Paisley Park South Access was the primary entrance/exit and the Paisley Park North Access was closed or converted to partial access (Option 2). 5) The study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the Paisley Park North Access closure (Option 2), restriping along Audubon Road, and optimized signal timing. All queuing will be maintained within the existing turn lanes. 6) Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify the Paisley Park North Access to ensure safe and efficient operations within the area. Therefore alternative access to the site, particularly off-site shuttle service for guests, should be considered until access to the site can be modified accordingly. 7) The current site layout can accommodate a total of approximately 165 parking spaces on site (105 north lot, 42 south lot, 18 garage). The peak on-site parking demand is estimated to be approximately 230 spaces, which results in a 65 space parking deficit a. Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify parking. Therefore alternative access to the site (i.e. shuttle service) or a reduction in overall tour guests (i.e. a maximum of 45 guests per tour) should be considered until adequate parking can be provided. Page 15 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen September 12, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study 8) Other considerations include: a. Development of a shuttle routing plan. b. Provide adequate on-site staffing and vehicle storage to ensure queues from entering guests do not extend into Audubon Road. If adequate storage is not provided, a traffic control officer may be needed at the Audubon Road/Main Entrance and/or the addition of a northbound right -turn lane should be considered. c. Consider the addition of pedestrian facilities (i.e. a sidewalk or trail), particularly along the east side of the site to reduce potential conflicts. H:\Pryed,\09000\9371\TS\Rrpo \9371_Draft_7801.9udxbonRoad_Tra!u_PankigStvdy_160912.daa Page 16 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on September 8, 2016 the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of a Rezoning request for property located at 7801 Audubon Road from Industrial Office Park (10P) to Planned Unit Development IOP to facilitate the use of the building as a museum to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Kim T Meuwissen, Deputy 6o Subscribed and sworn to before me this 8K day of 44kt216w 2016. JENNIFER ANN POTTER Notary Pubric-Minnesota (,*otly Public MY Com*Sion EVWW Ju 31.2020 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: -City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. To consider a request to rezone property located at 7801 Proposal: Audubon Road from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development IOP to facilitate use of the building as a museum. Applicant: Bremer Trust Property 7801 Audubon Road. Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-24. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous Questions & by email at kaanensonoci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.d.chanhassen.mmus/notifyme to sign u i City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions. Fanned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews. Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Afterations. Rezooings. Comprehensive Fan Amendments and Coda Amendments require a Public hearing before the Fanning Commission. City ordinances require all Property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any Interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports aro available by request. At the Fanning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the pudic to speak about the proposal as a part of the heading process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. Tho City Coundl may reverse, aMmm or modify wholly or partly the Manning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments lake a simple mejortty vote d the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialAndmtrat • kannesola State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A netghbomood spokespersonlrepresentative is encouraged to provide a owlad for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Fanning Commission holds the public heading, the City Council does not. Mnulm are taken and any correspondence regarding the application wilt be Induced In the report to the City Council. M you wish to haw something to be included In the report. lease contact the Manning Stag poison named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: Cit Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. To consider a request to rezone property located at 7801 Proposal: Audubon Road from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development IOP to facilitate use of the building as a museum. Applicant: Bremer Trust Property 7801 Audubon Road. Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the proiect. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-24. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous Questions & by email at kaanenson(")c ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Ravbw Procedure: • Subdivisions, Fanned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, WatiarM Alterebons, Rezorme s, Comprehensive Fan Amendments and Code Amendments require a Public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property Within 500 feel of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Slag prepares a report an the subject application that Includes all perknent information and a recommendation. These reports are avalleble by request. At the Fanning Commission meeting, staff Wit give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened far the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing Process. The Commission Will deals the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify Wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vete of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerolallindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check With the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonimpresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged M meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available b review Me project With any interested person(s). • Because the Manning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any comeapoodence regarding the application will be Induced in the report to the Clly Council. IF you Wish to hew something to be Included In me report, lease conned the Planning Staff person named on to deification. Taxpayer Name CORE MPLS INDUST PORTF ETAL CARLA M BROCKPAHLER Property Address 1270 PARK RD _ 1340 PARK RD Property City -State -Zip CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 Taxpayer Address _ _ 1600 DAVE ST #450 6835 GOOSE LAKE DR Taxpayer City -State -Zip NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-2447 WACONIA, MN 55387-9663 SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC 1430 PARK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1430 PARK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8961 - STATE OF MINNESOTA- DOT GALLER PROPERTIES LLC CHRISTIANS PROPERTIES LLC ALFRED A IVERSEN SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMM 1450 ARBORETUM BLVD 1450 PARK CT 1480 PARK RD 1500 PARK RD 1620 ARBORETUM BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 ICHANVMSEN, MN 55317 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 _ 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD MAILSTOP _ 9376 KIOWA TRL 1480 PARK RD 1500 PARK RD 13500 TECHNOLOGY DR 5T PAUL, MN 55155-1899 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8616 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9591 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8200 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 553442283 CAMPBELL PROPERTIES LP II 1621 MCGLYNN RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1415 N LILAC DR # 280 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422-4526 MICHAELJ GORRA 1680 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1680 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4503 TWO S PROPERTIES INC 7800 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 PO BOX 25025 GLENDALE, CA 91201-5025 PRN MUSIC CORPORATION 7801 AUDUBON_ RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 7801 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8201 TFK MAMMOTH LLC 7801 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 7801 PARK DR STE F CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9219 MUSTANG LLC 7850 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 7860 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9294 LOTUS HOLDINGS LLC 7851 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 7411 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9722 K & L PARTNERS 7870 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 14417 LAKE STREET EXT MINNETONKA, MN 55345-2923 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC #366 8000 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 PO BOX 1113 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1113 DEB BREMER 15040 BOULDER WAY MINNETONKA, MN 55345 15040 BOULDER WAY MINNETONKA, MN 55345 Aanenson, Kate From: Jennifer <jsinger321@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 11:30 AM Subject: Paisley Park Zoning Concerns I have heard the news that the city is considering rezoning the Paisley Park property into a museum. I have heard many things about this is what he wanted. The family and bank have reached out to a company that has run Graceland to run tours of his complex. I have a variety of concerns about this project. TRAFFIC How will this impact the traffic and noise in the surrounding businesses and neighborhoods? In the business plan, they seem to have a strict parking plan. What will happen to the people that arrive early and are not able to park on site? Do we anticipate them hanging around on the street close by? Currently, there are dozens of businesses, including two daycare centers next to Paisley Park. My concern is that it will cause more traffic on the adjacent roads, making it unsafe for those children. We currently have an issue with the traffic on Audubon from the Auto MotorPlex monthly shows. It's not safe to cross the street there and I haven't seen the community do much to help with that. How can we expect that they will address the Paisley Park museum correctly? In the months following Prince's passing, the intersection at Audubon and Highway 5 had been closed. It took quite a while for it to be opened up again to normal traffic again. During peak times like the opening, concerts, do you see this happening again? NOISE When Prince was alive and performing, we often would hear him playing his music from our house. Should we be expecting this type of noise today? Based on the business plan, they anticipate having up to 2,000 additional people come through a day and potentially have visitors as late as midnight on the weekends. How do you see that effect his neighbors? In the weeks following his death, we were kept awake at night from passing new helicopters cover over our property in hopes to get aerial shots of his house and grieving family. With the opening and other events that the museum may hold, should we be expecting this type of disruption again? COST The company that would like to run the museum doesn't feel like the best choice. They seem to be trying to find a way to maximize their profits with little regard to the community and potential guests to the museum. A fee of $37 would cost a couple almost $80 to visit. At the costs proposed, it would be hard for regular families to able to go. Their polity to only be able to purchase tickets online makes it more secure, but it is also challenging for individuals that do not have access to the internet to see his place. This model seems like a way to gain more profits, and less about giving back the community. TAXES What kind of tax revenues does the city expect to get? Where is this tax money going to be spent on? Will it be reinvested in the community and schools? Or will it help pay for additional police to monitor the additional traffic it will create? Will it be spent to update the roads around Paisley Park to assist with the additional traffic it will create? CRIME Do we anticipate it affecting any crime? This will bring an additional demographic of individuals to the community. While they may have security up in the parking faculty of the museum, this is will not prevent people from committing crimes elsewhere in the community. We will see increased traffic violations, speeding, and possible accidents. MOTIVES The company that wants to run this is not local. They do not know our community. They don't live here. To them, they see it as a way to make a profit. Why did Price want his place to be a museum? So fans could see how he lived? So they could see where he threw parties and what a recording studio looked like? It seems like a way to gawk at a dead man's house, see his cars and other positions. What will people gain from this experience? Are they going to feel inspired to break the mold and become famous so they can acquire these possessions? If the price was lowered, and it was made so everyone could appreciate his legacy, instead of those with large pocketbooks, 1 might understand the motivation for Chanhassen to approve it. As it stands now, it looks like a way for people to make money off of his legacy. ALTERNATIVES Have they thought about renting it as a recording studio? Maybe creating some place for the community to utilize it more? Create a music scholarship with the profits, or use the studio space for up and coming artist to rent out his studio at reduced rates. This could give local musicians a chance that wouldn't normally to make their own music. Instead of creating a place to gawk at his possessions, have some functionality to it. As a museum, it is only going to gain dust. While Prince may have hoped that someday his home become a museum for his fans, that doesn't necessarily mean that it is best for the community. One of the main reasons we moved to this community was the small town feel. As soon as we got we have seen nothing but development. I respect his contributions to our community and the music industry, but I want to make sure that he is respected in the correct way. He stood up for himself and his ability to control his music. He has been an inspiration to many and I do feel that he was a gem in our community. He chose to live in this community because of its small town feel away from the craziness of the music industry. In his death, I'm not sure he would want his community he loved to be negatively impacted by him. Thanks, Jennifer Singer 8470 Pelican CT Chanhassen MN Aanenson, Kate From: Kristi Strang <krististrang@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 12:39 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Paisley Park Hi Kate, I am writing to you concerning the plan to turn Paisley Park into an museum. My main concern for this plan is the traffic it will create. I live along Audubon Road and am concerned that people will use Audubon as their route to Paisley Park. I ask that in your planning you figure out ways to direct people to take Highway 5 to reach Paisley Park. I assume there will be Tourist Signs going up along the route, please place those along Highway 5 rather than directing people through the residential area along Audubon. Also, I assume there will be directions on the museum's website guiding people there. I hope you can work with the management company to provide directions via Highway 5. Highway 5 is a state highway, whereas Audubon Road goes through a residential area. Please keep in mind your citizens that live along this road. Thank you, Kristi Strang 1701 Valley Ridge Trail S. Chanhassen Aanenson, Kate From: LynneI.Etlinq@Eaton.com Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 10:53 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Paisley Park Museum Hi Kate, I would like to comment on the above proposed request for rezoning as I too have the same concerns as Wendy O'Connor and quite frankly many in our community. What's the rush? Let's do this right so that the citizens of Chanhassen and our surrounding communities do not feel the pain of the increased congestion on HWY 5 and 212. This was just submitted on 8/22/16, and it does not appear that the traffic study will be done in time before this will be approved. Why are we not holding Bremer and Prince's family to the same standards as other requestors? It appears as though everyone is looking at the dollar signs and not focused on serving the citizens of our community, which in my humble opinion should be their top priority. If you remember, I strongly opposed letting a variance for a drive through for the proposed Milo's sub restaurant on Century Blvd. Sadly it was passed anyway and was quickly changed to a Burger King! The citizens in this community now suffer with the increased constant smell from their grill stack, the loud car stereos from the young clientele that it attracts, as well as the mounting trash that blows all over our neighborhood because their dumpster is not big enough to handle the trash for the whole development. Also, the city has never enforced any of the upkeep of the grounds of this property as many dead bushes and trees remain missing. My point is that I feel promises have been broken by our city council and our leaders in the past and now it seems as though this museum is already a done deal. It leads me to suspect that there has been discussions in the works behind the scenes to push this through—just for the sake of an increased tax base for our city. I would like to see improvements done to Audubon and HWY 5 intersection as well as the creation of a 2 n parking lot on the property that is owned across the street from Paisley Park as well as improvements to the fencing and landscaping before this rezoning is approved and the museum is opened. Thank you for your time. Kind regards, Lynne Etling Chanhassen Resident 7681 Century Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 Aanenson, Kate From: SUSAN DAVIS <sdavisl0@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 3:48 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Cc: SUSAN DAVIS Subject: Paisley Park Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good afternoon, I recently purchased an office condo on Stone Creek Drive to expand my mental health practice/business. I have been in St. louis Park for 18 years and decided it was time to expand to the SW Metro. I turn at Audubon and Coulter Blvd. to get to the office as will many of the clients that come to see the therapists and psychiatrists at this location. I do not support turning Paisley Park into a museum. There is considerable pedestrian congestion now. It is dangerous to have to stop to allow pedestrians who run across the road, stop traffic. Audubon is a 2 lane road. How does the city plan on addressing the traffic issues? Are clients going to have to drive to the next light, Galpin and backtrack to my office? This will negatively impact my business and truthfully the lives of people suffering from mental health issues. Imagine the anxiety this will produce when a client is stuck at the light at Audubon and as a result is late and/or too late to make their appointment. Who is going to compensate the local businesses? Where in the world are people going to park to see the museum? Oh, I see, you are going to allow "them" to tear down green space to build a parking lot. I don't get it and disagree. How much more green space are we going to tear down for people to get rich? To suggest that there will not be anymore traffic generated than General Mills? I find that hysterical. There is more traffic in and out of Stone Creek than General Mills and the museum will certainly draw more. Don't get me wrong, I like Prince. His loss is tragic and will have impact on the music world and our community for years. His death could have been prevented had the need for secrecy and privacy not outweighed the need to get him help. What this community needs is more clinics like mine to help individuals get well and not feel as though they need to hide mental health or physical health issues either due to stigma, reprisal, or both. Having said that, I do not support this endeavor. When are there going to be community meetings to voice concern for this? Susan Davis, LICSW Executive Director Choices Psychotherapy 612-991-7666 Aanenson, Kate From: J Sparrow <sparrow9419@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 1:06 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Paisley Park Greetings, I would just like to extend my support and happiness for Paisley Park becoming a museum. My wife and I celebrated our 25th Wedding Anniversary in June and we stayed in Chanhassen and hoped that sometime we would be able to come back to tour Paisley. We love your city and will be staying there next week when we come back for The Revolution concert in Minneapolis. We know why Prince called Chanhassen home and look forward to our visit next week! Paisley Park needs to be preserved and we are so glad it will be. Thank you John Sparrow Whitmore Lake, Michigan 1 Aanenson, Kate From: Stephanie Friant <stephaniehfriant@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 7:14 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Paisley Park Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged We moved to Bluff Creek Estates in the fall of 2014. We understood and accepted the businesses along Audubon and the housing developments south of us. We also assumed that at some point Paisley Park would become a museum. We see this as a good thing for the city, but are worried about some aspects that seem to be overlooked. Traffic Driving down Audubon multiple times a day, we will be impacted by the hourly increase of 150 cars (either going in or out...). This is very different than the General Mills plant where they are coming in and out at shift changes, which do not always align with general traffic hours and are not spread out, but kept to shift changes. Also, this doubles the amount of cars per day. I can only assume that individual cars and buses will be coming from both the south and north of Audubon. With the proposed shopping development, it is safe to assume that many non -locals will be using Audubon between the two places. As I have personally seen more and more non -locals disregarding that Audubon is a public - and local - street by either parking in the middle of it or standing in the middle to take pictures (or just walking across right in front of incoming traffic) - I am concerned for the long term "glitches". Concern 1: People going South on Audubon turning Left across traffic into Paisley Park. The major increase in this type of traffic is concerning - both from the perspective of those driving North past PP, but also backing up into the intersection of 5 and Audubon. Concern 2: The business plan indicates that individuals arrive PRIOR to their allotted time will be turned away. Where will they go? How will these "inconvenienced people" who are not locals create driving issues for others? Will they just park along the nearby roads or make risky turns? Concern 3: The ongoing issue of those parking along McGlynn Drive and people walking across Audubon to walk along the PP fence line. With tickets around $40 each, those who cannot afford it will continue to take advantage of this parking area, in addition to those who make not have the time to go on the tour. The lack of a crosswalk, or no -parking signs, or any other regulations are continuously leaving those who use Audubon regularly to slow down and watch for pedestrians who are not always observant or walk swiftly (earlier this week there was a bus load from a senior residence!). With PP hours being extended until l Opm, the darkness will impact this situation also, especially during our early Winter nights. (Currently most visits to the PP fence appear to be during daylight hours.) I am assuming this will be an huge issue again during the Ryder Cup, but also do not see this going away. In fact, with the added traffic from the PP museum visitors, this may increase the possibility of accidents, close -calls, etc. As in the early weeks following his death - avoiding it by going down another street did not always eliminate the issue. ALSO, will all visitors have to enter PP by vehicle or will they be allowed to walk in? This minor policy requirement may help with these issues (I personally would rather walk a block and not have to wait after I m done with the tour than have someone park my car.) Concern 4: The Automotorplex will continue with it's monthly cars and coffee. They have made some change with parking, which is helpful. However, how will this impact the PP visitors who are coming from either way on Audubon and do not understand the additional traffic and why people are out on the streets? What about the intersection of 5 and Audubon? And what if PP decides to host events or festivals on the same day? Concern 5: Parking. I appreciate the idea of busing people in from MOA and the airport (despite them not spending any money in Chanhassen). But I am concerned about the business plan including two times the vague parking of employees at another site and busing in visitors too. Where are they assuming they will park these people? Will they use Lake Ann park? Or the public parking ramps? Will this be a free service provided by the city? Have they concerned purchasing the property across Audubon from PP on McGlynn drive for additional parking and installing a pedestrian bridge over the road or a lighted crosswalk? I would appreciate some feedback - at least that these concerns will be included in the overall public comments or not summarily dismissed. We love living here and despite the increasing business development, plan to continue to live here and be contributing members of this community. (I work at Launch Ministry helping struggling 18-29 year olds in Carver and Scott Counties.) Our children are enjoying a wonderful childhood here. We just don't want to see this ruined by development that turns Chanhassen into another Eden Prairie. There is a reason why we live here - and not in Hennepin County or in Minnetonka. Thank you for your work. I'm sure it is a busy time! BlessingsM Stephanie Friant LounchMinistry.org SistersUnderTheTrees Bloe Sisters UnderTheTrees on Etsv! Concern 4: The Automotorplex will continue with it's monthly cars and coffee. They have made some change with parking, which is helpful. However, how will this impact the PP visitors who are coming from either way on Audubon and do not understand the additional traffic and why people are out on the streets? What about the intersection of 5 and Audubon? And what if PP decides to host events or festivals on the same day? Concern 5: Parking. I appreciate the idea of busing people in from MOA and the airport (despite them not spending any money in Chanhassen). But I am concerned about the business plan including two times the vague parking of employees at another site and busing in visitors too. Where are they assuming they will park these people? Will they use Lake Ann park? Or the public parking ramps? Will this be a free service provided by the city? Have they concerned purchasing the property across Audubon from PP on McGlynn drive for additional parking and installing a pedestrian bridge over the road or a lighted crosswalk? I would appreciate some feedback - at least that these concerns will be included in the overall public comments or not summarily dismissed. We love living here and despite the increasing business development, plan to continue to live here and be contributing members of this community. (I work at Launch Ministry helping struggling 18-29 year olds in Carver and Scott Counties.) Our children are enjoying a wonderful childhood here. We just don't want to see this ruined by development that turns Chanhassen into another Eden Prairie. There is a reason why we live here - and not in Hennepin County or in Minnetonka. Thank you for your work. I'm sure it is a busy time! Blessingslll Stephanie Friant LaunchMinist„ry.org SistersUnderTheTrees Bloe Sisters UnderTheTrees on Etsv! Aanenson, Kate From: Wendy OConnor <mnoconnor@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 3:12 PM To: Aanenson, Kate; Tjornhom, Bethany; Ryan, Elise; McDonald, Jerry; Campion, Dan; Laufenburger, Denny Subject: Paisley Park Proposal Hello there, I wanted to send an email in regards to the Paisley Park Museum Opening on 10/6. I am concerned about the rush to get this Museum up and running so quickly. This was announced to the community (& the world) on August 24"', with a request for changing the current zoning from an Industrial Office Park to Planned Unit Development Industrial Office Park. The Planning Commission Meeting with Public Input scheduled for September 20th and a Final Vote from City Council on October 3rd (three days from proposed opening). I have read the business plan and it seems pretty solid. My concern for our community is that the traffic study has not been submitted. As a matter of fact, no other project documents are available for review other than the letters of recommendation and excitement from the City, the Mayor, and Bremer Trust. In general terms, it takes about 60 days for a project to be approved and ready to go. With documents and applications etc being available for all community members so we can be as informed as possible prior to the Planning Commission Meeting. As an example, I pulled a few plans that have been approved. The differences between the Chick Fil A plan and the Paisley Park Plan are obvious. 29 planning documents versus zero planning documents yet the timing of Chick Fil A is longer and it would seem that Chick Fil A will not be drawing in guests from around the world. Around the state perhaps, but not around the world. Chick Fil A plan: Proposal: 3/18/16 Planning Commission Meeting with Public Input: 4/19/16 City Council Meeting: 5/9/16 Letter of Approval: 5/16/16 60 Day Review Date: 5/17/16 29 Project Documents Paisley Park Plan: Business Plan (no proposal): 8/19/16 Planning Commission Meeting with Public Input: 9/20/16 City Council Meeting: 10/3/16 60 Day Review Date: Should be 10/19/16 Museum Opening 10/6/16 Zero Project Documents If the current traffic and guests are already an indication on how this will go, I think it can be managed and this company seems committed to doing so; but not unless there is a detailed Traffic Study. In my opinion, the Hwy 5 entrance to Audubon needs to be immensely improved over the next few months with partnership from the state. I think the Museum opening should be held off until the improvements are completed. If you put the cart before the horse and open the Museum prior to improvements being made, the traffic will be even worse once construction starts because we will have this influx of cars that will be unable to utilize Hwy 5 during the construction. I realize that this is a State Highway, but it is the job of our city leaders to manage safety and security for all residents and visitors, if we cannot have acceleration lanes to improve the merge onto Hwy 5, we are selling our city and ourselves short. In some of the prior development proposals I looked at, things like examples of landscaping, bike racks, & benches to make sure that the proposal is aesthetically pleasing as well as ADA compliant. If all they are changing is the driveway, shouldn't there be a proposal of what that will look like? Will the sidewalks around PP be improved to accommodate the increase in foot traffic? If so, who will be responsible for improvement? Will the Estate be responsible to make sure people are not crossing outside of the crosswalk? How is this influx of people and cars affecting our environment? Are there garbage cans/recycling onsite or nearby? These are the types of things that should be addressed prior to opening this as a fully functioning Museum. It's an exciting opportunity for our community but I think the rush to get it started is not in everyone's best interest. It's definitely in the interest of Prince's Estate. We have all seen the news reports about a huge tax bill looming. That is no reason to put our community and infrastructure in jeopardy. Paisley Park is already selling tickets, the city website basically has it billed as a done deal, while the community members that will endure the congestion, traffic and confusion have not even been heard from and will not be heard from until the Planning Committee Meeting on September 20th, with voting by City Council expected on 10/3 - three days prior to Museum opening. My opinion may not be a popular one, but my concern that the world will be watching when this Museum opens. If the city isn't prepared we will only have ourselves to hold accountable. Sincerely, Wendy OConnor 1702 Valley Ridge Trail North Chanhassen Resident for 17 years Wendy OConnor I mnoconnor@yahoo.com 1612.770.1203 2 To: Kate Aanenson To: Chanhassen City Council Tuesday, September 13, 2016 As I read the Traffic Study I noticed that they have made several great suggestions that I'm hoping will be completed prior to the Museum opening. Since the site will only be closed on Thanksgiving and Christmas, there is no time like the present to execute on the suggestions. Here are my concerns that weren't addressed in the Traffic Study: Parking issues - while the addition of 65 parking spaces will account for the 230 required spaces, there is no consideration on snowfall and the need for additional spaces during the winter in Minnesota. The Traffic Study referred to the planned hours for the tours, but did not offer any opinion on them. Paisley Park has requested hours of 9-9 every day except Christmas and Thanksgiving. As everyone is aware, Graceland Holdings is managing Paisley Park Museum. Graceland has hours of 9-5 Monday thru Saturday and 9-4 on Sunday. Given the size difference of Paisley Park (9 acres) and Graceland (14 acres), I would suggest that 9-5 would be more than adequate time for the Museum to operate. "McGlynn Road and the existing Paisley Park access locations were not reviewed as part of the existing conditions due to limited activity." This is important. There is no crosswalk at McGlynn and pedestrians are crossing in 45mph traffic. What defines limited activity? Cars or pedestrians? I personally sat at the comer of McGlynn and Audubon on Saturday September 3rd for two hours. Starting at 1:37pm I counted 174 cars pulling in to McGlynn from both directions on Audubon (I didn't count going out). McGlynn was constantly full on both sides of the street and in the daycare driveway. From those 174 cars, I counted 622 pedestrians crossing the street back and forth at McGlynn and the south entrance to Paisley Park. Most of them were on their phones using Social Media to check in and share where they were with their friends. These distracted pedestrians were crossing 45mph street without a crosswalk. I'm sure that the Paisley Park management team is confident that many of the visitors will purchase tickets for the tour, but I can tell you many of the people that I talked to were simply curious. These individuals will continue to come and look no matter how many tours are offered. They are not there to spend $50 for an entrance fee, they just want to see what this is all about. These are the people that we need to Protect as there is nothing in the Traffic Study in regards to addressing the pedestrians. This crosswalk that isn't a legal crosswalk appears to be endorsed by the city as I saw the Community Service Officer drive past twice that Saturday only slowing down to let pedestrians cross the street. The Officer drove down Audubon a third time and entered McGlynn. She sat at the end of the cul de sac for about 15 minutes and then drove away without walking out and approaching any of the pedestrians crossing. Based upon that very unscientific observation, the City of Chanhassen appears to be allowing this pedestrian crossing to continue & will be held accountable when there is an accident. Examples of my unscientific observations are attached. .;�� <� � . 4 �� h 8 � =� i �` � �` .. � � �:�: � .f �� t. � • r fir.. ilk _ � rr I - - - - - !► ►moi A r i'o i 'irKY� yYa `i L� M i S I s � �� ` 4 i 1 T ��Y' 3 �y � r ,7 �' - r = ci i ,. c Y t ` � w 4 ..�. �a 'R �� -'-*. � ' .yam �1+-EYP �fi R _ � {. i .l _ a �• � { r' � � r Ff. � _ � i. _� �� ; � r v''�s - f ;!tl' � '_7j �;n A 9is t .. ,. .1. ! C� � 4 , '�. �. —_� ie � N r picture 4 picture 5 Picture one - Red vehicle pulls over into the crosswalk across McGlynn in picture one Picture two - Red vehicle pulls up further now completely covering the crosswalk Picture 3 - attempting to get a picture of the pedestrians you can still see the red vehicle on the crosswalk Picture 4 - Red vehicle is still there and finally goes out into traffic while at least four cars are stopped on Audubon South. This is all going on as the brown vehicle from the page above was stopped on the East side of Audubon headed North. An example of six cars stopped on the side of the road to take a look. Bottom right picture the biker nearly ran into the black minivan. 9/3/16 Uber pick up at McGlynn and Audubon headed south 9/3/16 Drop off at McGlynn and Audubon. Driver turned around and did a U -Tum at McGlynn and headed North on Audubon 9/3/16 There are real issues that continue to concern me about this project. In my opinion it is being rushed through with little concern for the community, visitors and infrastructure. Limited parking spaces and snowfall, long hours of operation, and pedestrian crossing need to be addressed thoughtfully prior to approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Thank you so much for considering my opinion. Sincerely, Wendy OConnor M J, E, Date Received Approved by. Application Fee Paid: Parcel Identification No. CITY OF CHANHASSEN Engineering Review �G Sheriff Review U(' 11h Fire Review Planning Review 0 Credit Card (last 4 digits) Legal Description Temporary Sales/Event Permit Application $50 Fee Building ?� Other Revi e w Date Approved: ❑ Cash (Receipt #) In order to allow sufficient time for an appeal from a permit denial, it is recommended that applications be filed at least ten (10) days prior to the event. SectionDetails Type of Event: ❑ Christmas Tree Sales Promotional Event (Open House, etc.) ❑ Sidewalk Sales ❑ Temporary Food & Beverage Sales ❑ Seasonal Produce Stands (NOTE: Additional permit may be necessary. Contact the MN Dept. of Agriculture at 651-201-6000 or visit their web site at htta://www.mda.state.mn.us� Name of Applicant: P Park Management, LLC c/o Graceland Holdings, LLC Address: 3734 Elvis Presley Boulevard, Memphis, TN 38116 Street city State Zip �hone: •0: 80 n Fax:( 01 ) 344-3124 Event Title/Purpose: Paisley Park Museum Tours Event Location: Paisley Park Alternate Phone: 901 ) 332-3322 Email: joelw@necaonline.com Address: 7801 Audubon Road Chanhassen MN 5.5317 Street city State i Zip Phone:( 08 1 803-6420 Fax:( 01 ) 344-3124 Date(s) of event: October 13-23, 2016 Number of people participating/attending: 2800 max./day Number of employees/workers: 60 max./day Provisions for parking and security: Busing for all guests/visitors security provided by applicant's security personnel Alternate Phone:9( 01 ) 332-3322 Email: joelw@necaonline.com Time(s) of event: 9:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. with last tour starting at 9:00 p.m. Type of merchandise: souvenirs, memorabilia and apparel SCANNEC Continue to Page 2 City of Chanhassen Will there be sound amplification equipment? if yes, describe: only to the interior of the existing Wig food be served at the event? H yes, describe: Temporary Sales/Event Permit Application Page 2 ® Yes ❑ No (NOTE: Additional permit is necessary) ® Yes ❑ No (NOTE: Additional permit may be necessary. Contact the MN Dept. of Health at 651-2011500 or visit their web site at Ii lAvww.health.state mn usldivsleivfoo&ficenselsaecevenf html Will alcohol be served at the event? ❑ Yes Q No (NOTE: Additional permit is necessary and food If yes, describe: service is required by the same vendor serving alcohol Will there be signage at the event? ❑ Yes ®No (NOTE: Additional permits may be necessary) If yes, describe: Other pertinent information: N/A Please attach a site plan or survey which accurately represents existing conditions on the site including: • Entrances and exits • Parking and driving areas • Proposed location of temporary structures including tents, stages, booths, first-aid/relief stations, dumpsters, portable toilets, sound amplification equipment, etc. • Proposed location of sign • Other information If deemed necessary OwnerSection 2: Property Name of Property Owner- PRN Music Coro ration Contact: Uc Bremer Trust, N.A , Attn: Alison A. Hauck Address: 1100 West St. Germain Street, Saint Cloud MN 56302 Street city state Zip Phone:32( 0 )258-2448 Attemate Phone:( 20 ) 260-1722 Fax:'( 320 1 255-9120 Email: `Hauck@Bremer com I have famviar¢ed myself with the Chanhassen i Cade chao[er 2D-tMa (Temoorary OuW" Sales) and subsequent ordnarwe an1erw*,,rft pertaining thereto, and wll adde by the preMsiarn ccrralned a einil . 1 declare that the irrf r bon I have provided un etie oppkill is bvihrul and 1 mWeratand that falatfirBam of answers m eas ipplutkn vAN result in denial of the applcaeon. I suthaize the City or Chanhassen, to InwsUltill all make whatever inquiries a% necessa 7 to varMY the etlorrrution provAed. Joel WemShanker October 11. 2016 Applicant's printed name App' nt's signature Date Alison A. Hauck Property owners/Manager's printed name 9 bi-Mit,11`p ftvenpurvy �d. October 11. 2016 Property Owner's/Manager's signature Date CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 10/11/2016 12:03 PM Receipt No. 00328641 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Shannon Pratt 642 Amherst Drive Burbank CA 91504 - Paisley Park ------------------------------------------------------- Temp Event 50.00 Total Cash Check 477 Change 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 C --i CITY OF MEMORANDUM CHONSEN 7700 Market Boulevard TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director Administration DATE: October 3, 2016 "-Q�`� PFax:952.227.11100 SUBJ: PaisleyPark Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 Fax: 952.2271110 g Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center The applicant, Bremer Trust National Association, the Special Administrator of the 2310 Coulter Boulevard Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate a Phone: 952.227.1400 museum at Paisley Park. They are requesting a rezoning to Planned Unit Fax: 952.227.1404 Development (PUD) to allow a museum as a permitted use in the zoning district. Planning & Natural Resources The staff is recommendingthe PUD rezoning for the following reasons: g g Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 • Provides for limitations on how the building can be used including hours of operation and traffic flow and parking. Public works • Preserves the existing building. 7901 Park Place . Limited expansion preserves the existing trees. Phone: 952.227.1300 Creates additional jobs. Fax: 952.227.1310 • Tourism generated supports the existing businesses. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Fax:952.227.1110 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 2016 to review the Website proposed rezoning. The Planning Commission voted six for and none against a motion www.ci.channassen.mn.us recommending approval of the rezoning request, Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 2 The Planning Commission requested that City Council consider the following: • Review the proposed transportation plan. • Consider bus routes only on Highway 5. • Require a Pedestrian Safety Plan. • Require a time frame for the completion of improvements. The September 20, 2016 Planning Commission minutes are attached to this staff report. Following is a summary of the changes to the application since the Planning Commission meeting: Offices were added as a permitted use. 2. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement has been added as a part for the PUD Ordinance. The applicant must submit a $25,000 escrow or letter of credit as a financial security to ensure the installation of the following improvements: a) Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left tum lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. b) Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. c) Install a paved connection between the northern and southern parking lots on the site by October 5, 2016. d) Relocate the northern access of the site 220 feet south of Highway 5 as shown in the September 15, 2016 SRF Traffic and Parking Study Option 1 by October 3, 2017. This relocated access shall be restricted to a right -out of the site. e) Sidewalks shall be installed within the site by October 3, 2017. f) A traffic study shall be completed within one year, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. 3. The PUD has been revised as follows specifying the development and regulations for the museum: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 3 e. Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated 9/15/2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -out only, relocating the Paisley Park north access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 3, 2016. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and Findings of Fact." ATTACHMENTS 1. PUD Ordinance. 2. Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 3. Findings of Fact. 4. SRF Traffic and Parking Study dated September 15, 2016. 5. Amended Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 20, 2016. 6. Planning Commission minutes dated September 20, 2016. 7. Emails. \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\plan\2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museum\euecutive s nnnary.doc AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, MN Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District shall apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted: 1. Museum. 2. Recording studio. 3. Hotel. 4. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than twenty percent (20%) of the floor space is used for retail sales. These sales may include food, beverages and memorabilia. 5. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each concert. 6. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each event. 7. Office. 8. Multiple buildings on a lot. C. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted uses. 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. d. Materials and Design Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. 1890870 e. Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -out only, relocating the Paisley Park north access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 3, 2016. E Parking 1. Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. If guests use on-site parking and the north and south parking lots are not connected: a. Audubon Road must first be restriped to include a left tum lane, and b. The number of on-site parking spaces for guests who arrive by a personal vehicle is limited to 105 spaces. 4. If guests use on-site parking and a connection between the north and south lots is paved: a. Audubon Road must first be striped to include a left tum lane into the southern access. b. All required permits, including from the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. c. The north access shall be limited to a right -out of the site. d. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must first be optimized based on the SRF study. 1890870 e. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. 5. If guests park on-site and site improvements include expanding the parking area to 230 spaces and connecting the north and south parking lots: a. Audubon Road shall first be re -striped for left tum lanes for north- and south- bound traffic at McGlynn Drive. b. The northern access shall be right -out only. c. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must first be optimized based on the SRF study. d. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. 6. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3' day of October, 2016, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on 1890870 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT PAISLEY PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT dated October 3, 2016, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and Paisley Park Facility, LLC. BACKGROUND. A. The City has approved a rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park to Planned Unit Development ("PUD"). The PUD requires the Developer to enter in this Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 2. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall construct the following improvements by the dates indicated: A. Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left tum lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. B. Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. C. Relocate the northern access of the site 100 feet south of Highway 5 as shown in the September 15, 2016 SRF Traffic and Parking Study, Figure 5, Option 1 by October 3, 2017. This relocated access shall be restricted to a right -out of the site. D. Sidewalks shall be installed within the site by October 3, 2017. 1880550 E. A traffic study shall be completed within one year, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. 3. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 4. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $25,000.00. 5. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. B. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. D. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property and/or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. E. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such 1880550 order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. F. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. G. The Developer represents to the City that the development complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 6. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 7. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Paisley Park Facility, LLC, c/o Bremer Trust, National Association, 1100 West St. Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, PO Box147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317- 0147. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 1880550 3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN (SEAL) AND: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Denny Laufenburger, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Denny Laufenburger and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DEVELOPER: PAISLEY PARK FACILITY, LLC M STATE OF ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2016, by ,the of NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 AMP/cjh 18ao55vi 5 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. _ Date: TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317-8363 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. , dated 2 , of (Name of Bank) 11; b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2 This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen Finance Director, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317-8363, and is actually received by the Finance Director at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. Its: 188055v1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA In Re: Application of PRN Music Corporation FINDINGS OF FACT for a Rezoning of Property legally described as AND DECISION Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Planning Case No. 2016-24 On October 3, 2016, the City Council met to consider the application of PRN Music Corporation to rezone property from IOP -Industrial Office Park to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The City Council of the City of Chanhassen hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and Decision in the above -captioned matter: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned IOP -Industrial Office Park. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial. 3. The description of the property is: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 4. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. 6. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. 7. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. 8. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 189252A 9. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 10. The museum will create new jobs in the City and the tourism will support the existing business. 11. The Planning Report No. 2016-24, dated September 20, 2016, prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council approves the rezoning to Planned Unit Development. Dated: October 3, 2016 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Denny Laufenburger, Mayor AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 1892520 Lam I ENGINEERS PLANNERS DESIGNERS consulting Group, Inc. To: Paul Oehme, PE Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Chanhassen From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Tom Sachi, EIT, Engineer Date: September 15, 2016 Subject: 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Introduction Memorandum SRFN& 0169371 SRF has completed a traffic and parking study for the proposed Paisley Park Museum at 7801 Audubon Road in the City of Chanhassen (see Figure 1: Project Location). The main objectives of this study are to review existing operations within the study area, evaluate traffic and parking impacts of the proposed development, and recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development. A review of the proposed access, circulation, and overall site operations was also completed. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations offered for consideration. Existing Conditions The existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline in order to identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes intersection turning movement counts, field observations, and an intersection capacity analysis. Data Collection Intersection turning movement counts were collected at the following locations between Thursday, August 25 and Sunday, August 28, 2016. e Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 e Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard e Audubon Road and Park Road These periods were selected as they include the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, as well as the Saturday midday peak period. Supplemental traffic counts were collected along Audubon Road on Saturday, September 3, 2016 to understand impacts associated with the adjacent AutoMotorPlex facility, which holds a Saturday event between 8 a.m. and 11 a.m. once a month. Annual average daily traffic (ADT) volumes within the study area, as well as historical MN Highway 5 timing movement counts from 2013 were provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUM 150 1 MINNHAPOLLS, MN 55447 1 763.475.0010 1 www.SRFcONSULruaG.COrt Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen September 15, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study A summary of the traffic volumes collected are illustrated in Chart 1. Review of the data collected indicates that traffic volumes along MN Highway 5 generally peak during the weekday a.m. (7:45 to 8:45) and p.m. (4:30 to 5:30) time periods. Traffic volumes along Audubon Road also generally peak during the same time periods, albeit at much lower levels. On Saturday, traffic volumes along MN Highway 5 peak during the midday (11:45 to 12:45), while volumes along Audubon Road remain relatively steady throughout the day. It should be noted that there is a noticeable traffic volume peak along Audubon Road that coincides with a Saturday AutoMotorPlex event. Chart 1 Existing Traffic Volume Profiles --*.—Weekday: Highway 5 t Weekday: Audubon Road ---*—Saturday: Highway 5 Satuday: Audubon Road ....»... Saturday (Car Show): Audubon Road 800 700 W E 600 0 500 J C_ 400 N 'i v 300 a o A 200 * y�•a(•ix•:r 100 Time of Day Z Observations were completed to identify roadway characteristics (.e. roadway geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls) within the study area. MN Highway 5 is a four -lane divided roadway with left- and right -turn lanes at Audubon Road. The posted speed limit along MN Highway 5 is 55 miles per hour (mph). Audubon Road, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road are two-lane undivided roadways. The posted speed limit along Audubon Road is 45 mph while the remaining study roadways are posted at 30 mph. The Audubon Road/MN Highway 5 intersection is signalized. All other study intersections are unsignalized with side -street stop control. Mcgiynn Road and the existing Paisley Park access locations were not reviewed as part of the existing conditions due to limited activity. Existing study area geometrics, traffic controls, and traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Page 3 W 0, Existing Conditions 9 C.Iang,.p. 1m. 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Figure 2 00169371 City of Chanhassen September 2016 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Intersection Capacity Analysis September 15, 2016 An existing intersection capacity analysis was completed for the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations can be compared. The weekday a.m. peak hour was not reviewed since the proposed development is expected to have minimal impact during that time. Saturday event conditions at the AutoMotorPlex were not reviewed given the limited impact. Intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic (Version 9). Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS), which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 1. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles experiencing minimal delays. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. Overall intersection LOS A through LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities. Table 1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections LOS Designation Signalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) A <_ 10 < 10 B > 10-20 > 10-15 C >20-35 >15-25 D >35-55 >25-35 E >55-80 >35-50 F >80 >50 For side -street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side -street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side -street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high levels of delay (.e. poor levels of service) on the side -street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 2 indicate that the study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the existing geometric layout and traffic controls. Side -street delays along Audubon Road are relatively minimal. However, northbound queues along Audubon Road extend beyond the existing Paisley Park North Access approximately 50 percent of the weekday p.m. peak hour (-185 feet). The 95th percentile westbound left -turning queues along MN Highway 5 during the weekday p.m. peak hour extend approximately 160 feet. Page 5 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen September 15, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection Weekday P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 B 17 sec. B 12 sec. Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard Irl A/B 12 sec. A/B 10 sec. Audubon Road and Park Road Ill A/B it sec. A/A 9 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control. where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Proposed Development The proposed development is expected to convert Paisley Park Studios into a Museum. Opening is currently planned for October 2016. Based on discussion with project stakeholders, the following information with respect to the Museum operation was assumed: • Hours of Operation: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. • Days of Operation: Everyday (except Thanksgiving and Christmas) • Maximum Guests per Tour. 65 people (50 General Admission; 15 VIP) • Tour Start Times: Every 10 minutes • Tour Duration: General Admission - 70 minutes; VIP - 100 minutes • Employees: Up to 60 but no more than 20 on-site at any given time (except special events) • Existing Parking Spaces: — 165 spaces (105 North; 42 South; 18 Garage) The two existing Paisley Park access locations along Audubon Road are expected to remain. The Paisley Park South Access, located across from Mcglynn Road and approximately 500 south of MN Highway 5, would serve as the employee entrance. The Paisley Park North Access, located approximately 125 feet south of MN Highway 5, would serve as the guest entrance. The guest entrance would be staffed at all times to manage/control access to the site. Existing + Museum Conditions To identify potential impacts associated with the proposed museum, traffic forecasts were developed for year of opening conditions. Since the museum is planning to open in October 2016, existing conditions with the addition of the proposed museum were reviewed. Therefore, the following sections provide details on the estimated trip generation and intersection capacity analysis. Trip Generation To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, a trip generation estimate for the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours as well as on a weekday daily basis was developed. Given the unique land use, data provided by project staff was utilized. For purposes of this study, a worst-case approach was assumed in which full capacity tours (65 guests) at the museum would occur starting every 10 minutes throughout the peak periods of the adjacent roadway. Page 6 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen September 15, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study The average vehicle occupancy was assumed to be 2.5 guests per vehicle. All employees were assumed to arrive and/or depart outside of the peak tour timeframes. No shuttle service/transit reductions were included as part of the analysis, although it is reasonable to assume approximately 10 to 15 percent of guests may arrive via a shuttle or transit. Results of the trip generation estimate indicates the proposed development is expected to generate up to approximately 312 peak hour trips during a sold out condition. If each tour was sold out for the entire day, the site could generate up to 4,000 daily trips. Although it may be not be likely that totes are completely sold out throughout the day, it is reasonable to assume that tours may be sold out during the peak periods. Therefore, the analysis focused on the peak hours of the adjacent roadways assuming sold out tour conditions during the peak periods. Table 3 Trip Generation Estimate Weekday P.M. Saturday Midday Sold Out Event Condition Size Peak Hour Trips Peak Hour Trips Daily In Out Trips In Out 65 Guests per Paisley Park Museum,') 10 -Minute Tour Start 156 156 156 156 4,000 (2.5 Guests/Vehicle) (1) Based on data provided by project staff. (2) Represents the maximum amount of trips expected to be generated (assumes sold -out tours throughout the day). Trips generated by the proposed development were routed throughout the study area based on the directional distribution shown in Figure 3. The distribution was developed based on a combination of data provided by project staff, existing travel patterns, and engineering judgment. The resultant year 2016 build peak hour conditions, including sold -out conditions, are shown in Figure 4. Year 2016 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine if the existing roadway network can accommodate the year 2016 build conditions, a detailed intersection capacity analysis was completed. Results of the year 2016 intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 4 indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the existing geometric layout and traffic controls. However, as westbound left -tum vehicles from MN Highway 5 access Audubon Road and eventually the Paisley Park North Access, the lack of a left -tum lane along southbound Audubon Road results in queues extending to MN Highway 5 during the weekday p.m. peak hour. These types of queues create a safety issue, as well as a reduction in the overall efficiency of the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection operations. Signal timing improvements alone would not address the operational and queuing issues associated with the proximity of the Paisley Park North Access. Therefore, relocating the Paisley Park North Access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location should be considered (Option 1). However, the best operations would occur if the Paisley Park South Access was the primary entrance/exit and the Paisley Park North Access was closed or converted to partial access (Option 2). Page 7 1 3 t' c`,�i f t i'. jry COIIRCl Boulevard it Ay• 3. e K W D, Year 2016 Build Conditions —Figure 4 C .... hing .P.1.,_ 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study 00169371 City of Chanhassen September 2016 Paul Oehme, Cita of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Table 4 Year 2016 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis September 15, 2016 Intersection Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 D 46 sec. B 17 sec. Audubon Road and Paisley Park North Access 117 A/B 13 sec. A/B 12 sec. Audubon Road and Paisley Park South Access 111 A/B 12 sec. A/B 11 sec. Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard Ill A/B 13 sec. B 10 sec. Audubon Road and Park Road Ill A/B 11 sec. A/B 11 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. To determine how the study intersection would be expected to operate if the Paisley Park North Access were closed (Option 2), another year 2016 build intersection capacity analysis was completed. This analysis assumed the traffic signal timing at the Audubon Road/MN Highway 5 intersection would be optimized, as well as restriping the segment of Audubon Road south of MN Highway 5 to include dedicated left -tum lanes at the Paisley Park South Access. Results of the year 2016 intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 5 indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the Paisley Park North Access closure, restriping along Audubon Road, and optimized signal timing. All queuing will be maintained within the existing turn lanes. It should be noted that northbound queues along Audubon Road at MN Highway 5 are expected to be approximately 200 feet during the weekday p.m. peak hour, which would occasionally extend beyond the Paisley Park North Access. Table 5 Year 2016 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis (Paisley Park North Access Closed) Intersection Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 C 22 sec. B 17 sec. Audubon Road and Paisley Park North Access it — — — — Audubon Road and Paisley Park South Access") A/B 13 sec. A/B 11 sec. Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard Ill A/B 12 sec. A/B 10 sec. Audubon Road and Park Road Ill A/B 11 sec. A/B 10 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control. where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify the Paisley Park North Access to ensure safe and efficient operations within the area. Therefore alternative access to the site, particularly off-site shuttle service for guests, should be considered until access to the site can be modified accordingly. Further discussion regarding access, site improvements, and tour operations is provided later in this document. Page 10 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Parking Review September 15, 2016 Based on a review of the current site layout, it is estimated that there is a total of approximately 165 parking spaces on site. Of these spaces, approximately 105 are located in the north parking lot, 42 are located in the south parking lot, and the remaining 18 spaces are in the underground garage. With the assumptions used as part of the trip generation estimates (i.e. 65 guests per 10 -minute tour, 2.5 guests per vehicle, 70 -minute tour length, and 20 staff on site), the peak on-site parking demand is estimated to be approximately 230 spaces. This accounts for guests arriving/departing at least 10 minutes before/after their respective tours. With the estimated peak parking demand (230 spaces) and the existing parking supply (165 spaces), there is expected to be a 65 space parking deficit. Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify/add parking. Therefore alternative access to the site (i.e. shuttle service) or a reduction in overall tour guests (.e. a maximum of 45 guests per 10 -minute tour) should be considered until adequate parking can be provided. Other Considerations In addition to the traffic and parking issues identified, the following other items are offered for consideration. An illustration of the potential access and parking modification options are shown in Figures 5 and 6. 1) Given the traffic, access, and parking challenges identified as well as the expected opening in October 2016, shuttle operations should be considered until adequate access and parking is provided. Potential shuttle routing is provided in Figure 7. 2) Provide adequate on-site staffing and vehicle storage to ensure queues from entering guests do not extend into Audubon Road. If adequate storage is not provided, a traffic control officer may be needed at the Audubon Road/Main Entrance. Furthermore, the addition of a northbound right -tum lane should be considered to reduce the potential for queuing issues on Audubon Road. 3) Consider the addition of pedestrian facilities (i.e. a sidewalk or trail), particularly along the east side of the site to reduce potential conflicts. Sensitivity Tests Based on discussions with project staff regarding the study results, two additional questions were posed. The fust question was with respect to how many trips per hour could be allowed if there were no modifications to the site (i.e. using the existing access locations). Results of this sensitivity test indicates that the maximum guests allowed to avoid queues along Audubon Road from extending to MN Highway 5 would be 30 guests per 10 -minute tour. All of the assumptions from the study apply to this determination, particularly the assumptions that the average vehicle occupancy is 2.5 people per vehicle and the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection signal timing would be optimized. Page 11 Llna(el B-PL-dOOP.S1aCVO\SiILLCUODOMSW.W&:H LL m J FAWAa u o TA" a�6 :^m 5" O N co a LI�EI : �P'Z x!140 aV.S\OQtl�1S11LGE61W060\s1�3fa�:H w �—Isr Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen September 15, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study The second question was with respect to if the tour access was moved to the Paisley Park South Access and a roadway was paved between the north and south parking lots, how many trips per hour could be allowed. Under this condition, the amount of parking spaces becomes the controlling factor. As noted in the study, the existing parking on site can accommodate a maximum of 45 guests per 10 -minute tour (.e. approximately 165 total spaces on site). Once again, all of the assumptions from the study apply to this determination, including the vehicle occupancy and expected tour length. Summary and Conclusions The following study conclusions and recommendations are offered for consideration: 1) The study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Side -street delays along Audubon Road are relatively minimal. Northbound queues along Audubon Road extend beyond the existing Paisley Park North Access approximately 50 percent of the weekday p.m. peak hour (--185 feet). 2) The proposed development is expected to generate up to approximately 312 peak hour trips during a sold out condition. If each tour was sold out for the entire day, the site could generate up to 4,000 daily trips. 3) Results of the year 2016 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. However, as westbound left -tum vehicles from MN Highway 5 access Audubon Road and eventually the Paisley Park North Access, the lack of a left -turn lane along southbound Audubon Road results in queues extending to MN Highway 5 during the weekday p.m. peak hour. These types of queues create a safety issue, as well as a reduction in the overall efficiency of the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection operations. 4) Signal timing improvements alone would not address the operational and queuing issues associated with the proximity of the Paisley Park North Access. Therefore, relocating the Paisley Park North Access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location should be considered (Option 1). However, the best operations would occur if the Paisley Park South Access was the primary entrance/exit and the Paisley Park North Access was closed or converted to partial access (Option 2). a. If no access changes were made, the maximum guests allowed to avoid queues along Audubon Road from extending to MN highway 5 would be 30 guests per 10 -minute tour. 5) The study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the Paisley Park North Access closure (Option 2), restnping along Audubon Road, and optimized signal timing. All queuing will be maintained within the existing tum lanes. The northbound queues along Audubon Road at MN Highway 5 are expected to be approximately 200 feet during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Page 15 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study September 15, 2016 6) Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify the Paisley Park North Access to ensure safe and efficient operations within the area. Therefore alternative access to the site, particularly off-site shuttle service for guests, should be considered until access to the site can be modified accordingly. 7) The current site layout can accommodate a total of approximately 165 parking spaces on site (105 north lot, 42 south lot, 18 garage). The peak on-site parking demand is estimated to be approximately 230 spaces, which results in a 65 space parking deficit. a. Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify parking. Therefore alternative access to the site (i.e. shuttle service) or a reduction in overall tour guests (i.e. a maximum of 45 guests per 10 -minute tour) should be considered until adequate parking can be provided. 8) Other considerations include: a. Development of a shuttle routing plan. b. Provide adequate on-site staffing and vehicle storage to ensure queues from entering guests do not extend into Audubon Road. If adequate storage is not provided, a traffic control officer may be needed at the Audubon Road/Main Entrance and/or the addition of a northbound right -turn lane should be considered. c. Consider the addition of pedestrian facilities (i.e. a sidewalk or trail), particularly along the east side of the site to reduce potential conflicts. H:\P.^x \090P7\9371\TARfmA"71_FINAL_7MlAxdvlvmR"W—T,,Oir_P.,, inSSt.fi-160915.4. Page 16 y � 9NN ASS PC DATE: September 20, 2016 8 --L� CC DATE: October 3, 2016 REVIEW DEADLINE: October 26, 2016 CASE # 2016-24 BY: AF, KA, TJ, JS, JM PROPOSED MOTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motions: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11 Block 1 Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance and Finding of Fact." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant Bremer Trust National Association, the Special Administrator of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate a museum at Paisley Park. They are requesting a rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow a museum as a permitted use in the zoning district. LOCATION: 7801 Audubon Road (Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park) APPLICANT: PRN Music Corporation 1100 West St. Germain Street St. Cloud, MN 55447-4443 AAHauck(a,Bremer.com PRESENT ZONING: Industrial Office Park (IOP) 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office Industrial ACREAGE: approximately 9 acres LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning because the city is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A PUD must be consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The site is currently zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP). A museum is not a permitted use in this district. A museum is permitted in the Office Institutional District zoning district however, this district would not permit other uses that are currently contained or proposed at Paisley Park including the recording studios, special events or boutique hotel. By rezoning the property to PUD the city can set the standards for use of the property. The staff is recommending rezoning the site to PUD with the IOP as the underlying district except as amended. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 2 of 20 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20 • Article VIII, Planned Unit Development District • IOP District Standards The site is bordered by TH 5 on the north, Audubon Road on the west, the city's public works on the south, and wetland with a stream running through it on the east. Access to the site is gained via two drives off of Audubon Road. Paisley Park was built in 1986 as a recording studio. The 9 - acre site contains an existing building with a footprint of 46,150 square feet. Location Map i9r y v�iA .s;•hy!s�Y Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 3 of 20 1986 Site plan BACKGROUND Paisley Park Facility has entered into an Exhibition Operating Agreement with PPARK Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Graceland Holdings, LLC to operate the Exhibition. The operations of the museum based on the Business Plan include: • No exterior construction other than relating to the parking lot and perimeter fencing. • Plan to be open October 6`h. • Hours of operation will be from 9 am to 9 pm on weekdays and 9 am to midnight on the weekends (hours will vary depending on ticket sales). • Tickets will only be sold on line and cannot be purchased at the site. • Tours will be in 10 -minute increments and each tour would have 25-30 guests. • Anticipate a total of 1500 to 2000 guest a day on the peak days. • Intended to have internal circulation to check in guest on the premises. • The museum will have 24/7 security. • Food and beverage will be sold at the conclusion of the tour. There will be a tent located near the kitchen for guests to sit and eat. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 4 of 20 • No alcoholic beverages will be sold or permitted on the property. • There will be merchandise for sale. • The recording studio will be used for special sessions. • There will be no events held outside Paisley Park Museum. • Concerts will continue in the performance hall. These events could be up to 1500 people and will be coordinated to ensure they don't conflict with the museum tours. • In the future, the round building may be developed into a boutique hotel. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The 2030 Land Use Plan has this property guided Office Industrial. The proposed zoning is consistent with this land use. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT Sec. 20-501. Intent. "Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfer of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other, more standard zoning districts. It will be the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate that the city s expectations are to be realized as evaluated against the following criteria. Planned unit developments are to encourage the following: 1. Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, mature trees, creeks, wetlands, lakes and scenic views. Analvsis: The changes to exterior of the site include additional parking and more capacity for storm water. 2. More efficient and effective use of land, open space and public facilities through mixing of land uses and assembly and development of land in larger parcels. An lvsis: Not applicable to this proposal. 3. High quality design and design compatibility with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. Site planning, landscaping and building architecture should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 5 of 20 Analysis: The building's architecture is unique. No changes to the exterior are planned. 4. Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city will be encouraged. Analysis: Not applicable to this proposal. Development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The subject site is guided Off ice Industrial. The development is consistent with the comprehensive plan for industrial use. 6. Parks and open space. The creation of public open space may be required by the city. Such park and open space shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Park Plan and overall trail plan. Analysis: Not applicable to this proposal. 7. Provision of housing affordable to all income groups if appropriate with the PUD. Analysis: Not applicable to this proposal. 8. Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and siting and the clustering of buildings and land uses. Analysis: Not applicable to this proposal. 9. Use of traffic management and design techniques to reduce the potential for traffic conflicts. Improvements to area roads and intersections may be required as appropriate. Analysis, A detailed traffic and parking study was prepared by SRF. Based on this study, staff has provided a detailed analysis of the traffic level of service and parking scenarios. Implementation of these options shall reduce the potential for conflicts. SITE PLAN REVIEW City staff will administratively review improvements to the site including parking lot expansion and new perimeter fencing. Sec. 20-108 of the city code permits administrative review of changes to a site plan. If the changes are less than ten percent of its gross floor area, provided that there is no variance involved and also provided that the community development director has conducted an administrative review pursuant to site plans standards. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 6 of 20 The intention of the operator is to install a new perimeter fence. The fence may be opaque and will limit visibility of the building. In addition, it will discourage things from being attached on the fence. The fence will be required to follow the city fencing ordinances. A tent is proposed in the northwest side of the building. Per the building code, a tent is a temporary structure and shall not be erected for more than 120 days in a 12 -month period. This tent must comply with building and fire code requirements. Sales, including merchandise, food and non-alcoholic beverages shall be limited and comply with the city code that states "Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for retail sales." ENGINEERING COMMENTS Grading The submittal did not contain a grading plan. Prior to any site disturbance a grading plan must be submitted for review and approval. Utilities The site is currently served by municipal sanitary sewer and water, upgrades to these facilities are not required at this time. The applicant shall submit the proposal to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services division (MCES) for a new Sanitary Access Charge (SAC) unit determination. If the MCES determines that the conversion to a museum results in additional SAC units, City SAC and Water Access Charges (WAC) and the MCES SAC charges must be paid. Future surface improvements such as driveway and parking lot expansion will require storm system improvements such as stone sewer installation and best management practices as required by the city and the watershed district. Traffic The property is located in the southeast comer of Trunk Highway 5 and Audubon Road. Highway 5 is classified as an arterial roadway and is under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT). Approval of the PUD and Site Plan are subject to MNDOT's conditions. Audubon Road, a two-lane major collector is identified as an "Important Transportation Facility" in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which states: This route connects TH 5, a major arterial, to Lyman Boulevard, another major arterial road. This route, in conjunction with Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road south Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 7 of 20 (CSAH 15), provides extended north -south transportation between communities. Audubon Road serves both residential and industrial development. A traffic study by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. was commissioned to evaluate the following: • Review existing operations of the study area, • Evaluate traffic impacts of the proposed development, • Evaluate the parking impacts of the proposed development, • Review the proposed access to the development, • Evaluate the site circulation and overall site operations, and • Recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development. A copy of the study is attached to this report. The traffic study estimates that the site will generate 4,000 trips per day based on the proposed tour size and schedule (65 guest/tour with a tour beginning every 10 minutes). The study estimates approximately 312 peak hour trips, meaning during the busiest hour on the adjacent routes, the proposed development would see 156 trips into the site and 156 trips out of the site. The existing (2015 traffic counts) and projected 2016 average daily traffic (ADT) volume is shown on Figure 1. As noted in Figure 1 the traffic on Audubon Road between Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive is estimated to be 7,800 ADT. As a comparison the 2015 ADT was 7,500 on West 78`s Street between Great Plains Boulevard and Highway 101, a two-lane major collector roadway. South of McGlynn Drive an additional 600 trips per day are estimated in the traffic study. In Figure 1 the `Build" volumes shown on Audubon Road south of McGlynn Road assumes that all southbound Audubon Road traffic out of the site will continue to Lyman Boulevard. It is possible that a portion of this traffic will tum at Coulter Boulevard, Park Road or Lake Drive therefore the projected volumes on Audubon Road south of McGlynn Road are conservative. The weekday PM peak on Audubon Road south of McGlynn Road is estimated to increase by 47 trips, which equates to less than one additional vehicle per minute between 4:30 pm and 5:30 pm, Monday through Friday. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 8 of 20 Highway 5, Highway 5, Eastbound Westbound Existing: 28,700 Existing: 27,900 1 :F t __ : t Build: 31,900 Build: 28,100` Audubon Road, Highway 5 to McGlynn Drive Sa � Audubon Road McGlynn Drive Existing: 4,400 to Lake Drive Build: 7,800 �\ West Existing: 4,400 Build: 5,000 r. Audubon Road, Lake Drive West : to Valley Ridge - Trail South Existing: 4,400 Build: 5,000 NNNJ"�Audubon Road, Valley Ridge Trail South to Lyman Boulevard Existing: 3,300 Build: 3,900 Figure 1. Average Daily Traffic Volume Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 9 of 20 Tours will operate from 9 am to 9 pm every day except for Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. The traffic study analyzed two peak trip generation scenarios: the PM weekday peak (4:30 pm to 5:30 pm) and the Saturday midday peak (11:45 am to 12:45 pm). The AM weekday peak was not analyzed as it does not correspond to the operating hours of Paisley Park. Supplemental traffic counts were taken on Audubon Road during the Saturday, September 3, 2016 Auto Motorplex event as the facility hosts a monthly event on a Saturday morning between 8 and 11. The Saturday event conditions were not reviewed as there would be limited impact on the system. The study observed the existing and projected the proposed traffic operations of the intersection of Audubon Road at Highway 5, Coulter Boulevard and Park Place. The existing and projected Level of Service (LOS, an indication of the quality of traffic flow) through each intersection was identified. The LOS designations range from A to F, with "A" representing an average delay less than 10 seconds/vehicle and "F" representing a delay greater than 50 seconds/vehicle (unsignalized intersection) or 80 seconds/vehicle (signalized intersection). The graphics below show the existing and anticipated traffic volumes and levels of service at the Audubon Road intersections at Highway 5 and the northern access; information on the McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard and Park Road intersections can be found in the traffic study. The analysis assumed no improvements to the roadway system, guests would access Paisley Park from the northern access, and employees of Paisley Park would use the southern access. (weekday PM peak volume/Saturday midday peak volume) Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 10 of 20 Level of Service Forficasted: /.-1%13, t112 The study results (weekday PM peak volume/Saturday midday peak volume) the southbou don Audubon , Road W.tu�iing left into the ❑or'l14;rn .ucc�� «ill queue in to Iii L11 \\,I\ during the cckda\ P\I the forecasted conditions: Northbound Audubon Road traffic queues extend beyc3nd thenoxthern,access to Paisley- ? �^ ►� ,' F Y.' ri Figure 4. Forecasted queuing assuming no improvements to the system. These queues would be a safety concern and would reduce the level of service at the Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection. Altering the timing of signal at the intersection would not remedy Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 11 of 20 the situation due to the proximity of the northern access to Highway 5. This access lies 100 feet south of Highway 5; per Figure 7-12 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan the access should be a minimum of 220 feet south of Highway 5. The study presents two options to address the queuing: Figure 5. Option 1: Relocate the northern entrance a minimum of 100' south of the current location Figure 6. Option 2: Utilize the southern entrance as the main access to the site; close or limit the northern entrance to a partial access Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 12 of 20 The study indicates that Option 2 would result in the best traffic operations. Table I summarizes the current and projected levels of service of the affected intersections assuming: • Implementation of Option 2, • Traffic signal timing optimization at the Highway 5 intersection, and • Restriping Audubon Road to include a left turn lanes to the southern access and McGlynn Road. Staff prefers a hybrid of Option 1 and Option 2: shift the northern access such that it is 220' south of Highway 5, limit the northern entrance to a right -out of the site, utilize the southern entrance as the full access to Paisley Park, and restripe Audubon Road to include a left turn lane into the southern entrance and McGlynn Road. Staff will work with MNDOT with regards to the signal timing at Highway 5 and Audubon Road. There is a traffic camera on the Highway 5 signal at Audubon Road. MNDOT's traffic operations center will monitor the intersection upon opening of the museum and adjust the westbound Highway 5 left turn signal as necessary. Parkin¢ Analysis and Site Plan The SRF study included a site plan with proposed parking as shown in Figures 5 and 6 of this report. Based on the Paisley Park proposal for 65 guests per tour, tours departing every 10 minutes, and limiting the time guests stay SRF determined that 230 spaces are required to accommodate on-site parking for all guests. Due to the timing of Paisley Park's application and the impending end to the 2016 construction season construction of the parking expansion this year is not feasible. The following scenarios summarize the options available to operate tours of Paisley Park: SCENARIO 1: Shuttle bus only for guests • This option would allow Paisley Park to operate tours with no improvements required to the Highway 5 signal system or Audubon Road. Highway 5 and Paisley Park North Access and Audubon Road Intersection Audubon Road Intersection Weekday PM Saturday Midday Weekday PM Saturday Midday Existing Level of Service B Level of Service B n/a n/a Condition 17 second delay 12 second dela Proposed, Level of Service D Level of Service B Level of Service A/B Level of Service A/B current system 46 second delay 17 second delay 13 second delay 13 second dela Proposed, system Level of Service C Level of Service B n/a n/a changes 22 second delay 17 second delay im lemented Staff prefers a hybrid of Option 1 and Option 2: shift the northern access such that it is 220' south of Highway 5, limit the northern entrance to a right -out of the site, utilize the southern entrance as the full access to Paisley Park, and restripe Audubon Road to include a left turn lane into the southern entrance and McGlynn Road. Staff will work with MNDOT with regards to the signal timing at Highway 5 and Audubon Road. There is a traffic camera on the Highway 5 signal at Audubon Road. MNDOT's traffic operations center will monitor the intersection upon opening of the museum and adjust the westbound Highway 5 left turn signal as necessary. Parkin¢ Analysis and Site Plan The SRF study included a site plan with proposed parking as shown in Figures 5 and 6 of this report. Based on the Paisley Park proposal for 65 guests per tour, tours departing every 10 minutes, and limiting the time guests stay SRF determined that 230 spaces are required to accommodate on-site parking for all guests. Due to the timing of Paisley Park's application and the impending end to the 2016 construction season construction of the parking expansion this year is not feasible. The following scenarios summarize the options available to operate tours of Paisley Park: SCENARIO 1: Shuttle bus only for guests • This option would allow Paisley Park to operate tours with no improvements required to the Highway 5 signal system or Audubon Road. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 13 of 20 • Minor site improvements would likely be necessary to accommodate the turning movements of the busses. • The tour size would be limited by the maximum occupancy per the Fire Code. SCENARIO 2: On-site guest parking allowed no site improvements • Audubon Road would be striped to include a left tum lane. • The number of on-site parking spaces for guests who arrive by a personal vehicle is limited to 81 spaces. • The parking spaces must be striped prior to October 5, 2016. SCENARIO 3: On-site guest parking allowed connect the north and south lots • A paved aisle would connect the north and south parking areas. • Audubon Road would be striped to include a left tum lane into the southern access and into McGlynn Road. • All appropriate permits- for example with Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District- must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. • Sidewalks installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance. • The north access would be limited to a right -out of the site. • The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study. • The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. • The parking spaces must be striped prior to October 5, 2016. SCENARIO 4: On-site guest parking allowed connect the north and south lots, expand arp king • The northern access would be converted to right -out only. • The northern and southern parking spaces would be connected and the parking lot would be expanded. • Sidewalks installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance. • Audubon Road would be restriped for left tum lanes for north- and south -bound traffic at McGlynn Road. • The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study. • The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. • The parking spaces must be striped before the parking lot is used for guest parking. There are many variables and discussion points associated with the parking and site plan that are best explained by stating the assumptions of the Paisley Park Business Plan and the SRF traffic study, concerns, options to address the concerns and the limiting factors of the options. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 14 of 20 Assumption Concern Potential Result Options Limiting Factors Guests arrive Guests will not no earlier than adhere to the 30 minutes requirement rior to tour Tickets state it is a self -guided Offsite tour; some parking and The maximum patrons may take shuttle to imperviousvrous Length of the longer than 70 minutes Additional parking the site surface allowed for the tour is that was not site is 701/6, minutes ss Facility adds accounted for in the Include conditions which limits more rooms to study in the PUD the amount of the tour, approval surface increasing the parking on the len of the tour requiring ongoing site. Guests will stay monitoring Guests must longer to enjoy of and leave within 45 the food, performance minutes of the shopping and standards end of the tour ambiance of for parking Paisley Park Pedestrian traffic to Some guests park the site. Currently Guests will off-site and walk there is no trail or park on-site to the site sidewalk to Paisley Park The parking will be monitored to determine the adequacy of the on-site parking. If at any time the Community Development Director or Fire Code deems that the on-site parking is inadequate the PUD shall be amended to decrease the maximum allowable tour size to a level where the on- site parking is sufficient, or the property owner must amend the PUD and the site plan to provide more parking. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the city and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. The applicant must submit a $25,000 escrow or letter of credit as a financial security to ensure the installation of the following improvements: • Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left turn lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Road/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016, 0 Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016, Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 15 of 20 • Install a paved connection between the northern and southern parking lots on the site by October 5, 2016, • Relocate the northern access of the site 220 feet south of Highway 5 by October 3, 2017. This relocated access shall be restricted to a right -out of the site, • Sidewalks shall be installed within the site by October 3, 2017, • A traffic study shall be completed within one year, as directed by the Public Works Director and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Road, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Road. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements to the roadway system and/or the site. The applicant shall submit engineered site plan drawings for review and approval. The site plan drawings must meet or exceed the requirements set forth in the Chanhassen City Code and the Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The site plan shall also meet or exceed the requirements of agencies that have jurisdiction over the site, such as MNDOT and Riley - Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District. Recommendation The Engineering Department recommended conditions for approval of the Paisley Park PUD and site plan are as follows: 1. Prior to any site disturbance a grading plan must be submitted for review and approval. 2. If the MCES determines that the conversion to a museum results in additional SAC units, City SAC and Water Access Charges (WAC) and the MCES SAC charges must be paid. 3. Future surface improvements such as driveway and parking lot expansion will require storm system improvements such as storm sewer installation and best management practices as required by the city and the watershed district in effect at that time. 4. If guests arrive to the site by a shuttle bus only, then tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy per the Fire Code. 5. If guests utilize the parking that is on-site as of September 15, 2016 (ie. no site improvements are installed): a. Audubon Road shall be striped to include a left tum lane by October 5, 2016, b. The number of on-site parking spaces for guests who arrive by a personal vehicle is limited to 81 spaces, and c. The parking spaces must be striped prior to October 5, 2016. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 16 of 20 6. If guests utilize the parking that is on-site as of September 15, 2016 and a paved connection is installed between the north and south lots: a. The connection between the parking lots must be installed by October 5, 2016, b. By October 5, 2016, Audubon Road must be striped to include a left tum lane into the southern access and to McGlynn Road, c. All appropriate permits- for example with Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District- must be obtained prior to installing the pavement, d. Sidewalks must be installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance by October 3, 2017, e. The north access shall be limited to a right -out of the site, f. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study, g. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, and h. The parking spaces must be striped by October 5, 2016. 7. If guests park on-site and site improvements include expanding the parking area and connecting the north and south parking lots a. The northern access shall be right -out only, b. Sidewalks must be installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance by October 3, 2017, c. By October 5, 2016, Audubon Road shall be restriped for left tum lanes for north - and south -bound traffic at McGlynn Road, d. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study, and e. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. 8. If at any time the Community Development Director or Fire Code deems that the on-site parking is inadequate the PUD shall be amended to decrease the maximum allowable tour size to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the property owner must amend the PUD and the site plan to provide more parking. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the city and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. 9. The applicant must submit a $25,000 escrow or letter of credit as a financial security to ensure the installation of the following improvements: • Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left turn lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Road/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016, • Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016, Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 17 of 20 • Install a paved connection between the northern and southern parking lots on the site by October 5, 2016, • Relocate the northern access of the site 220 feet south of Highway 5 as shown in the 9/1/16 SRF Traffic and Parking Study Figure 5 Option 1 by October 3, 2017. This relocated access shall be restricted to a right -out of the site, • Sidewalks shall be installed within the site by October 3, 2017, • A traffic study shall be completed within one year, as directed by the Public Works Director and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Road, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Road. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. 10. The applicant shall submit engineered site plan drawings for review and approval. The site plan drawings must meet or exceed the requirements set forth in the Chanhassen City Code and the Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The site plan shall also meet or exceed the requirements of agencies that have jurisdiction over the site, such as MNDOT and Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District. Stormwater When a full site plan is submitted it will be review the proposed alterations and comment accordingly. The site plan must comply with Article VII of Chapter 19. In addition, the site will be governed by the requirements of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. Landscaping Landscape Requirements Minimum requirements for landscaping include 1,140 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot expansion, 4 trees and 2 landscape islands or peninsulas for the expanded parking area. Applicant's proposed landscaping as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landsca a area 1,140 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Trees/ parking lot 4 overstory 0 overstory 2 islands or peninsulas 0 islands/peninsulas Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 18 of 20 The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for landscaping. Recommendations: 1. The applicant shall submit a parking lot landscape plan for approval that meets minimum ordinance requirements. 2. The applicant shall increase landscaping in existing parking area to meet minimum ordinance requirements: 2,280 sq. ft. of landscape area, 9 trees and 4 islands or peninsulas. Building review The proposed future uses of the existing structure(s), as outlined in the provided documents, would necessitate a change in Occupancy Classification under the Minnesota State Building Code. (The "Paisley Park" building has a Certificate of Occupancy for `B", "S-1" occupancies only. The "exterior round building" was never completed and has no Certificate.) The existing building must be compliant (or be made compliant) with the requirements of the Occupancy Classification of these proposed uses: Museum (A-3 Occupancy), Food and Drink (A-2 Occupancy), Retail sales (M Occupancy), Recording studio (B Occupancy), Concert usage (A-1 Occupancy) and Storage (S-1 Occupancy). (Ref. 2015 MSBC, Chapter 3) 1. Permits must be obtained for the alteration of or occupancy use changes to any buildings on the site. (Ref. MN Rule 1300.0120) 2. Supporting documents (plans, specifications, etc.) must be prepared by and signed by the appropriate design professionals. (Ref. MN Rule 1300.0130) 3. Existing structure's physical plant (plumbing, HVAC, electrical, fire suppression, fire -rated separations, etc.) must be evaluated and approved as functioning as required by the various proposed Occupancies. 4. A new Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained before use or occupancy. (Ref. MN Rule 1300.0220) 5. A "Sewer Access Charge" redetermination is required (Metropolitan Council). 6. The "studio building" project was stopped (by the owner) sometime in 2002 and the permit subsequently expired. The building is incomplete and has no Certificate of Occupancy, therefore, cannot be used for any purpose. A new building permit must be applied for (including all related documentation) and approved for construction to re- commence. A letter advising of the expiration of the permit was sent to the contractor (Rutledge Const.) and to Fred Evans (Paisley Park Enterprises) in February of 2003. 7. Accessible parking is required; the number of required accessible parking spaces is determined by the Minnesota State Accessibility Code, Table 1106.1 (based on the total number of provided spaces, parking plan required). Fire Review Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 19 of 20 Some consideration needs to be given to an alternative use of a concert hall which I will cover later in this document. Parking Plan Regardless of approved use, a minimum of a 20' access to areas of any part of the building must be maintained to allow emergency vehicle access and egress during hours of operation. I am not concerned about out lots at this point. A proposed site plan, to include actual parking areas, should be provided so the Fire Code can indicate fire lanes etc. Building Use In the planned use they loosely imply that the use could be as a concert hall. Historically, these concerts have been scheduled with no notice and no access. The major issue relates to the open configuration of the main sound stage. The configuration has changed dramatically and involves temporary seating. Consideration should be given to; Either require a special event permit for any event that would involve the concert use of this property to ensure appropriate stage and seating configurations, parking, are reviewed and approved by the building official, fire department, and planning department. Or; Create a fixed seating and stage arrangement utilizing an appropriate architect negating the need for permit requirements unless a deviation from the approved plans is necessary. Approved occupancy would be based on the arrangement and approved by the building official. Fire Inspections The last on-site fire inspection was conducted in 2015. I have been working with Bremer Bank representatives to correct several open violations from that inspection. It should be noted that none of the open violations are of a serious nature. The most serious relates to off hours' access to the building which is currently being worked on with an outside contractor. Prior to opening, and pending planning approval, the building will need a complete fire inspection based on the new building classification. That inspection can be conducted as soon as possible and should not dramatically change any requirements already existing for the current building classification as a B Occupancy. This inspection will also identify any work done to remedy open violations from the 2015 inspection. Storage Area Within the planned use, the document refers to a storage area. I am confused if this is indoors or outdoors. The document eludes that vehicles, including a bus, may be stored for display. I am also to understand that the viewing areas are all on the main level leading me to believe that this does not include the parking garage specifically designed for parking vehicles. If the plan is to park vehicles indoors for viewing, a fire protection engineer should review and approve the site plan ensuring the current suppression system can cover the fire load increase created by the vehicles. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 20 of 20 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motions: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11 Block 1 Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance and Finding of Fact. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact 2. PUD Ordinance 3. Development Review Application 4. Business Plan 5. Chanhassen City Code, Chapter 20 — Article =1. - "IOP" Industrial Office Park District 6. Traffic Study SRF dated September 12, 2016 7. Affidavit of Mailing Notice of Public Hearing. 8. Emails from residents: a. Email from Jennifer Singer b. Email from Kristi Strang c. Email from Lynne Etling d. Email from Susan Davis e. Email from John Sparrow f. Email from Stephanie Friant g. Email and memo from Wendy OConnor h. Email from Nancy Pexa i. Email and memo from Melanie Mertes j. Email from Brian Haak g:�plan\2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park mu rn\pc staff report.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Request for a rezoning of property legally described as within Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park. — Planning Case No.2016-24 Application of PRN Music Corporation. On September 20, 2016, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of PRN Music Corporation to rezone property from IOP -Industrial Office Park to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned IOP -Industrial Office Park. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial. 3. The description of the property is: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The planning report #2016-24, dated September 20, 2016, prepared by Kate Aanenson, et a] is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20`s day of September 2016. Its Chairman GAPLAN\2016 Planning Cases\2016-24 Paisley Park Museum\Findings of Fac[.doc AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City s zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following -described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, Minnesota Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District shall apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted: 1. Permitted uses in the IOP Zoning District. 2. Museum. 3. Recording studio. 4. Hotel. 5. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than twenty percent (20%) of the floor space is used for retail sales. These sales may include food, beverages and memorabilia. 6. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. 7. Multiple buildings on a lot. 8. Private events. C. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 1. All uses not listed as permitted uses. 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. d. Materials and Design Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. 189087vl e. Parking Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. If guests use on-site parking and the north and south parking lots are not connected: a. Audubon Road must first be restriped to include a left turn lane, b. The number of on-site parking spaces for guests who arrive by a personal vehicle is limited to 105 spaces. 4. If guests use on-site parking and a connection between the north and south lots is paved: a. Audubon Road must first be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access, b. All required permits, including from the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement, C. The north access shall be limited to a right -out of the site, e. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must first be optimized based on the SRF study, f. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. 5. If guests park on-site and site improvements include expanding the parking area to 230 spaces and connecting the north and south parking lots: a. Audubon Road shall first be restriped for left turn lanes for northbound and southbound traffic at McGlynn Road, b. The northern access shall be right -out only, C. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must first be optimized based on the SRF study, d. Sidewalks must be installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance, e. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. 6. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. tsvos7vi Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of 2016, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on 3 189087vi 2010 -a If COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division – 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHANHASSEN Mailing Address – P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone (952)227-1300/Fax. (952)227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW %uhmittal Dat, _ 912 2- ) Pc Dale: �� _ CC Dale:, IQ GO -Day Review Date. _y a3 (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal mromration that must accompany this appin:nlion) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment._.. _.................. $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ Consolidate Lots ....................... _ ................$150 ❑ All Others ........................................................ $425 [� Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ Final Plat ........................................................$700 ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence..$325 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' ElAll Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) through the development cataract Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 $300 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD... .............. $100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ...................... ...... ................ ... ..$150 Welland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ Administrative.................................................. $100 $275 ❑ Commercial/industrial Districts' ...................... $500 $100 Plus $10 per 1.000 square feet of building area: Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA).. _... t — thousand square feet) 'Include mwmbei of existpg employees: 'ImAude rwmber of new employees. ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit 1_ units) ❑ Subdivision (SUB) NOTE: when multiple applications an, processed concurrently, the appropriate foo shall be charged for each application. NotificationSign (city to install are remove).................................................................................................................... $200 Properly Owners' List within 500' (city to generate aver pre -application meeing) ............................l�3 y s!.. $3 per address ................ . (IR_ addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Si a Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements (_ easements) TOTAL FEE: $7 0 l Description of Proposal Museum at Paisley Park, 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen MN 55317 Property Address or Location: 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Parcel #: 25.1900110 Legal Description.. Total Acreage: 9.01 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No See attached. Present Zoning: Industrial Office Park District (IOP) Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Present Land Use Designation: Office/industrial Requested Land Use Designation: Officepndustrial Existing Use of Property: Recording studio, soundstage, performance hall. office and warehouselstorage ❑� Check box is separate narrative is attached. ;00 ❑ Create 3 lots of less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot (_ lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots ....................... _ ................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ......................................... $150 ❑ Final Plat ........................................................$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' 'Additional esrxow may be required for other applications through the development cataract E] Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording le.s may apply) ❑ Variance (VAR) ................................................... $200 ❑ Welland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ AN Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA).. _... $500 NOTE: when multiple applications an, processed concurrently, the appropriate foo shall be charged for each application. NotificationSign (city to install are remove).................................................................................................................... $200 Properly Owners' List within 500' (city to generate aver pre -application meeing) ............................l�3 y s!.. $3 per address ................ . (IR_ addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Si a Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements (_ easements) TOTAL FEE: $7 0 l Description of Proposal Museum at Paisley Park, 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen MN 55317 Property Address or Location: 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Parcel #: 25.1900110 Legal Description.. Total Acreage: 9.01 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No See attached. Present Zoning: Industrial Office Park District (IOP) Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Present Land Use Designation: Office/industrial Requested Land Use Designation: Officepndustrial Existing Use of Property: Recording studio, soundstage, performance hall. office and warehouselstorage ❑� Check box is separate narrative is attached. ;00 Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: N/A Address: Contact: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email. Fax' Signature Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees. feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name PRN Music Corporation. c/o Bremer Trust, N.A. Contact: Alison A. Hauck Address: 1100 West St. Germain Street Phone, (320) 258-2448 City/Stale/Zip Saint Cloud, MN 56302 Email, AAHauck@Bremer.com Signature: �.r,E'4,,�,�, Cell: (320) 260-1722 Fax: (320)259-9120 Date: 8/19/16 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: SRF Consulting Gioup, Inc. Contact Matt Pacyna, PE Address: One Carlson Parkway North. Suite 150 Phone (763) 249-6726 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 554474443 Cell: (612) 382-2546 Email: ntpacyna@srfconsufting.com Fax: (763) 475-2429 Section 4: Notification Who should receive copies of staff reports? information 'Other Contact Information: n Properly Owner Via Q Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: Stinson Leonard Street LLP, c/o Todd M. Phelps ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: 150 South Fifth St., Suite 2300 Engineer Via: Q Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55402 �(] Other' Via: Q Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: tocid.phelpsCa2stinson.com INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing (required). �� SAVE FORM PRINT FORM t SUdY1T FORM STINSON LEONARD STREET August 19, 2016 HAND DELIVERED Kathryn R. Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 CITYOFCHANHil RECEIVED AU6 2 2016 CHANHAMIRlAtippN1110T Todd M. Phelps 612.335.1871 DIRECT 612.335.1657 DIRECT FAX todd.phelps@sfinson.com Re: Application for Development Review -7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN. Our File No: 3009435.0002 Dear Ms. Aanenson: This letter is submitted on behalf of Bremer Trust, National Association (the "Special Administrator'), the court-appointed Special Administrator of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson (the "Estate"), in support of the enclosed Application for Development Review (the "Application") for the real property and improvements owned by the Estate located at 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota, legally described as Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part of said Lot 11, shown as Parcel 220 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-1 (the "Property"). Enclosed please find the following: 1. The Application to rezone the Property from Industrial Office Park District (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). 2. A check in the amount of $750.00, payable to the City of Chanhassen. 3. The Paisley Park Museum Business Plan, which sets forth in greater detail the proposed use of the Property as a museum to honor the late Prince Rogers Nelson. In further support of the enclosed Application, the Special Administrator submits the following pursuant to Article VIII "Planned Unit Development District" of the City of Chanhassen Zoning Code: Sec. 20-501. Intent. The rezoning of the Property from IOP to PUD for use as a museum is supported by the intent of the PUD zoning for a number of reasons. First, the use of the Property as a museum preserves the unique recording studios, soundstage, performance hall, and artwork that was created in the City of Chanhassen over a 30 -year period by a worid- 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET, SUITE 2300 • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55102 www.s tins onteona,d.com 612.335.1500 MAIN • 612.335.1657 FAX CORPJ3009435.00021128640409.1 August 19, 2016 Page 2 renowned artist, who sold over 100 million records, won seven Grammy Awards, a Golden Globe Award, and an Academy Award for the film "Purple Rain," all of which are displayed at the Property. Second, the PUD zoning will offer enhanced flexibility for the Property to allow for the museum, continued use of the recording studios, soundstage, performance hall, offices and warehouse/storage, as well as for limited food service and merchandise sales, as further described in the Business Plan. Third, the PUD zoning is consistent with the City of Chanhassen 2030 Land Use Plan, which designates the Property as Office/Industrial. Under Section 20-792 of the Code, museums are a permitted use in the "OI" Office and Institutional District. Sec. 20-502. Allowed Uses. The primary use of the Property will be as a museum. However, as further described in the Business Plan, we anticipate that the Property will continue to be used as a recording studio, soundstage, and performance hall. Additionally, limited food service and merchandise sales will be uses ancillary to the museum use. Sec. 20.503. District Size and Location. The Property is approximately 9.01 acres and thus meets the minimum size requirements under the Code. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration of the Special Administrator's Application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (612) 335-1871. Sincerely, STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP 4V( AL, 11111461-�', Tod6 M. Phelps TMP/jl CORE/3009435.0002/129640409.1 PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM BUSINESS PLAN August 19, 2016 Bremer Trust, National Association, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate a museum at Paisley Park, 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN, the former recording studio of Prince Rogers Nelson. The family of Prince is supportive of operating Paisley Park as a museum and believes that this is what Prince would have wanted for all of his fans. Paisley Park Facility has entered into an Exhibition Operating Agreement, with PP Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Graceland Holdings, LLC to operate the Exhibition. The management team of Graceland Holdings, LLC has been involved in the operations of Graceland in Memphis, Tennessee since 1982. Graceland has over 30 years of experience, having handled in excess of 20 million visitors and 8 million vehicles during that time, including all aspects related to traffic and attendance management, ticket control, security, retail and food and beverage service as part of Graceland and operating a similar museum facility and tours. Graceland's experienced management team will be providing development, management, and oversight of all aspects of the museum at Paisley Park. In recent years, Graceland has over 600,000 guests per year, while maintaining an amicable relationship with the City of Memphis and neighbors of Graceland. Graceland is in the process of expanding its operations to include operation of a hotel complex a few blocks from the Graceland mansion which is scheduled to open in October 2016 and also opening up a World's Fair entertainment complex across the street from the Graceland mansion which is scheduled to be open in March 2017. Graceland Holdings is highly committed to this project and making it success for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson as well as the local and broader Twin Cities community. Toward that end Graceland is providing the initial funds for capital improvement and initial operating costs of the museum. The following is the proposed business plan for the Paisley Park museum operations: Building Construction — We do not anticipate any exterior construction at the site, other than items related to the parking lot. In terms of interior construction, we anticipate widening doorways, adding lighting, motion detectors, and sound systems in areas of the facility. We will also be completing various improvements required for fire safety purposes. As previously reviewed with the City of Chanhassen, we will also be replacing the existing chiller/boiler at the facility. Operations — We plan to open the Museum in early October (subject to obtaining all approvals required by the City of Chanhassen). The family of Prince Rogers Nelson has an Official Family Tribute Concert scheduled for Thursday, October 1P at U.S. Bank Stadium, and the plan is to have the Museum open in advance of that so that out of town visitors and others that attend the Tribute Concert will also be able to complete a tour of Paisley Park. We anticipate operating the Museum from 10 am to 10 pm during the week and from 9 am to midnight on weekends, although we will vary these hours based on ticket demands and may have less hours during the week or in winter months. At this time, it is difficult for us to predict peak hours, but we anticipate heavier traffic in evenings and weekends. 128637840.2 Tickets to the Museum will be sold only online and will not be able to be purchased at the site. We will not permit any walk-up entry. Tickets will be for a specific time tour and guests will be permitted to park and enter Paisley Park only 20-30 minutes early. This time frame and limited access will be strongly emphasized in ticketing and repeated messaging to guests. The length of the tour will be approximately 70 minutes and guests will be required to exit within 30-45 minutes after the conclusion of their tour. The maximum guest stay during peak times will be 2 hours. Tours will be guided tours and will start in 10 minute increments and each tour is expected to include 25-30 guests. We anticipate a total of 1500 to 2000 guests per day on peak days. Ticket prices will be $38.50 for standard tickets. A VIP Tour experience will also be offered for smaller guests groups with prices of $100 or more. Guided tours will take guests through the recording and mixing studios, video editing rooms, rehearsal rooms, Prince's private NPG Music Club, and the soundstage and performance hall. The tour will be contained to the main floor of the facility and will be indoors, except for an exit from the performance hall to the storage garage where cars and the tour bus will be able to be viewed. We will add a tent to the breezeway passage from the performance hall to the storage garage. We anticipate employing 20 to 60 people from the local area during the museum's operating hours. This amount will vary based on the tour volumes and times. We will also be engaging a substantial number of local contractors and service providers to ready the facility for operations by early October. Traffic/Parking — The facility currently includes approximately 90 parking spaces in its front parking area. We plan to further expand the parking area to the east to add an additional 40-50 spots. In addition, because we will be utilizing parking attendants we would anticipate being able to "double-park" cars based on knowing what times people will be exiting the facility and can utilize an additional 28-30 spots based on this method of parking. This will result in total parking of approximately 160 spaces. Based on Graceland's experience, we estimate that there will be 2.5 guests per vehicle, which based on the anticipated attendance and tour times equals 60 vehicles per hour and a maximum of 150 vehicles parked at any given time given the ticketed tour windows and a maximum guest stay of 2.0 hours in peak time periods. As noted below, we also anticipate as many as 20% of guests being shuttled from other locations particularly during peak hours. We will expand the front gate area to include a coned cul-de-sac area so that cars can easily exit from Audubon Road. We will have parking attendants that will immediately review parking tickets and time windows to confirm if a vehicle can enter the parking lot. If a guest's allotted time period has not yet arrived, the attendant will direct the car to exit the cul-de-sac and return during the ticketed time period. The attendants will also be patrolling the exterior fence and Audubon Road to prevent any cars from stopping along the road or otherwise causing traffic congestion. We will have parking attendants that will direct parking. We will be adding lighting to the parking lot to the extent there is not sufficient lighting currently there. In the future, we may utilize land across Audubon Road for additional parking. 2 128637840.2 A traffic study related to the facility is being prepared and will be submitted to the Planning Commission. On our current estimates, the traffic volumes will be less than the volume of cars entering the nearby General Mills facility based on observed traffic study there. We expect to utilize the back parking lot and garage for employees of the facility to park and will also utilize off-site shuttle and parking for employees. We are also making arrangements with bus companies to conduct shuttle trips from the airport and/or the Mall of America area. Security — The Museum will have 24x7 security. We will install a new security system. The Museum will hire security guards and supervisors for its operations. Food & Drink — The Museum will offer food and beverage at the conclusion of the tour. There will be no alcoholic beverages sold or permitted to be consumed at the facility. The food is anticipated to be a limited item of vegetarian items including a tasting plate, dessert, and select sandwiches. We are interviewing vendors to provide the food and anticipate that while some food would be prepared offsite and delivered daily that there would be select portions of the menu that would be prepared on site. The Museum anticipates erecting a tent connected (or semi -attached) to the exit near the restrooms in a portion of the exterior parking area where guests could sit for a brief period to eat upon conclusion of the tour. (See attached exterior map). There will be no smoking permitted at the facility. Merchandise — The Museum will include sales of merchandise on-site including apparel, guidebooks and other souvenirs. Other Events — Paisley Park will continue to be utilized as a recording studio for special sessions. In addition, we anticipate that concerts will also continue to be held in the performance hall. There would be no events outside. No events are anticipated to be held until at least March 2017 and no arrangements or bookings have been made related to future events. We anticipate that such events will be held on Friday or Saturday weekend and that offsite parking arrangements will be made. Based on square footage of the performance hall the attendees at events could be up to 1500 people at one time. Studio and concert usage of the facility will be limited in order to avoid interfering with tour attendance. Future Activities — While future plans have not been developed, some of the additional potential uses or ancillary operations for Paisley Park include additional parking and potential development and completion of the exterior round building. We may also develop onsite limited occupancy lodging in the future. 3 128637840.2 See Attached Facility Map 128637840.2 entrance expansion t7f0JOS':1 "1 Paisley Park k proposed lot extension Attachment #5 ARTICLE XXII. - "IOP" INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT Sec. 20-811. - Intent. The intent of the "IOP" district is to provide an area identified for large-scale light industrial and commercial planned development. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-1),12-15-86) Sec. 20-812. - Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in an "IOP" district: (1) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (2) Automotive repair shops. (3) Conference/convention centers. (4) Health services. (5) Indoor health and recreation clubs. (6) Light industrial. (7) Offices. (8) Off -premises parking lots. (9) Print shops. (10)Recording studios. (11) Utility services. (12) Vocational school. (13) Warehouses. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-2),12-15-86; Ord. No. 240, § 21, 7-25-95; Ord. No. 259, § 27, 11-12-96; Ord. No. 377, § 109, 5-24-04) Sec. 20-813. - Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in an "IOP" district: (1) Automotive repair shop. (2) Day care center. (3) Parking lots and ramps. (4) Signs. Page 1 Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for retail sales. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-3), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 93, § 1, 7-25-88; Ord. No. 377, § 110, 5- 24-04) Sec. 20-814. - Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in an "IOP" district: (1) Contracting yards. (2) Day care centers as part of a multi -tenant building. (3) Day care centers as a separate facility. (4) Food processing. (5) Gun range, indoor. (6) Home improvement trades. (7) Hotels and motels. (8) Lumber yards. (9) Motor freight terminals. (10) Outdoor health and recreation clubs. (11) Screened outdoor storage. (12) Research laboratories. (13) Reserved. (14)Commercial towers as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (15) Electrical distribution and underground electric distribution substations. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-4), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 97, § 1, 10-24-88; Ord. No. 120, § 4(12), 2-12-90; Ord. No. 259, § 28,11-12-96; Ord. No. 377, § 111, 5-24-04; Ord. No. 390, § 5, 3-14- 05; Ord. No. 527, § 4, 8-22-11) State Law reference— Conditional uses, M.S. § 462.3595. Sec. 20-815. - Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "IOP" district subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum lot area is one acre. (2) The minimum lot frontage is 150 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall have a minimum frontage of 60 feet. Page 2 (3) The minimum lot depth is 200 feet. (4) The maximum lot coverage is 70 percent. (5) Off-street parking shall comply with district setback requirements except: a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad right-of-way, except as provided in chapter 20, article XXV, division 3, pertaining to landscaping requirements. b. There is no minimum setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. c. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. d. The minimum setback is 25 feet for side street side yards. e. Parking setbacks along public rights-of-way may be reduced to a minimum of ten feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that 100 percent screening is provided at least five feet above the adjacent parking lot. The intent of this section is that the city is willing to trade a reduced setback for additional landscaping that is both an effective screen and of high quality aesthetically. Acceptable screening is to be comprised of berming and landscaping. Screening through the use of fencing is not permitted. (6) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, four stories/50 feet. b. For accessory structures, one story. (7) Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards, 30 feet. b. For rear yards, ten feet. c. For side yards, ten feet. d. The minimum setback is 100 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. In instances where existing topography and/or vegetation provide buffering satisfactory to the city, or where quality site planning is achieved, the city may reduce setback requirements by up to 50 percent. The applicant shall have the full burden of demonstrating that there is sufficient separation and screening for the higher intensity use. e. Buffer yards. 1. The city comprehensive plan establishes a requirement for buffer yards. Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density uses and shall comply with chapter 20, article XXV, of the Chanhassen City Code. Page 3 2. The buffer yard is not an additional setback requirement. The full obligation to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use. 3. The buffer yard is intended to provide physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use. As such, they will be required to be provided with a combination of berming, landscaping and/or tree preservation to maximize the buffering potential. To the extent deemed feasible by the city, new plantings shall be designed to require the minimum of maintenance, however, such maintenance as may be required to maintain consistency with the approved plan, shall be the obligation of the property owner. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-5),12-15-86; Ord. No. 94, §§ 1, 7, 7-25-88; Ord. No. 136, §§ IA, IB, 1-28-91; Ord. No. 451, § 8, 5-29-07; Ord. No. 474, §§ 14, 15, 10-13-08) Sec. 20-816. - Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "IOP" district: (1) Churches. (2) Concrete mixing plants. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90) Secs. 20-817-20-900. - Reserved. gAplani2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museum\sec._20_812.__pemiitted_uses..dmx Page 4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on September 8, 2016 the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of a Rezoning request for property located at 7801 Audubon Road from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development IOP to facilitate the use of the building as a museum to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Kim T Meuwissen, Deputy':, r' Subscribed and sworn to before me this g day of .2016. ,, ,x;24 JENNIFER ANN POTTER Notary Public -Minnesota - " My Ca m=w Enww Jun 31. 2020 of y Public Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. To consider a request to rezone property located at 7801 Proposal: Audubon Road from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development IOP to facilitate use of the building as a museum. Applicant: Bremer Trust Property 7801 Audubon Road. Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.c!.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-24. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous Questions & by email at kaanensonoci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this !tem will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/nottfyme to sign up! unry Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Panned Unit Developments, Site Ran Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Ran Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. Oty ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any alleresled party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting. staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the pudic to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings. land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezom ngs and land use amendments from residential to commercialfndustriel. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days untess the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Manning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Coundl meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a sorted for the city. Often d"lopers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(sj. • Because the Manning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. lAnutes are taken and any corespontswce regarding the applicatlon will be Included in the report to the City Council. H you wish to have something to be included In the report, lease contact the Planning Stag person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. To consider a request to rezone property located at 7801 Proposal: Audubon Road from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development IOP to facilitate use of the building as a museum. Applicant: Bremer Trust Property 7801 Audubon Road. Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.c!.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-24. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous by email at kaanensonfa7ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Questions & 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! Clfy Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Weiland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party Is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Manning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of Me hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the Oty Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly a partly the Planning Commission s recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and and use amendments from residential to commerdalMdustnal. • Minnesota Slate Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Manning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encoureged to provide a corded for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meal with the neighborhood regarding their proposal Staff is also available to review the pmj%t with any interested person(s). • Because the Manning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the repos to ft City Coundl, If you wish to have something to be included In the report, lease contact the Manning Staff person named on the nodfia lion. Taxpayer Name CORE MPLS INDUST PORTF ETAL CARLA M BROCKPAHLER SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT GALLER PROPERTIES LLC CHRISTIANS PROPERTIES LLC ALFRED A IVERSEN SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMM CAMPBELL PROPERTIES LP 11 MICHAEL 1 GORRA TWO S PROPERTIES INC PRN MUSIC CORPORATION TFK MAMMOTH LLC MUSTANG LLC LOTUS HOLDINGS LLC _ K & L PARTNERS MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC #366 DEB BREMER Property Address Property City -State -Zip 1270 PARK RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1340 PARK RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1430 PARK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1450 ARBORETUM BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1450 PARK & CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1480 PARK RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1500 PARK RD CHANHASSEN, M N 55317 1620 ARBORETUM BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1621 MCGLYNN RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1680 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 7800 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 7801 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 7801 PARK DR _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 7850 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 7851 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 7870 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 8000 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 15040 BOULDER WAY MINNETONKA, MN 55345 Taxpayer Address 1600 DAVE ST #450 16835 GOOSE LAKE DR 1430 PARK CT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD MAILSTOP 9376 KIOWATRL 1480 PARK RD _ 1500 PARK RD 13500 TECHNOLOGY DR 1415 N LILAC DR # 280 1680 78TH 5T W PO BOX 25025 7801 AU DU BON RD _ 7801 PARK DR STE F 7860 PARK DR 7411 FRONTIER TRL 14417 LAKE STREET EXT PO BOX 1113 15040 BOULDER WAY NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-2447 WACONIA, MN 55387-9663 _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8901 ST PAUL, MN 55155-1899 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8616 _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9591 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8200 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-2283 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422-4526 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4503 GLENDALE, CA 91201-5025 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8201 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9219 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9_294 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9722 MINNETONKA, MN 55345-2923 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1113 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 Aanenson, Kate From: Jennifer <jsinger321@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 11:30 AM Subject: Paisley Park Zoning Concerns I have heard the news that the city is considering rezoning the Paisley Park property into a museum. I have heard many things about this is what he wanted. The family and bank have reached out to a company that has run Graceland to run tours of his complex. I have a variety of concerns about this project. TRAFFIC How will this impact the traffic and noise in the surrounding businesses and neighborhoods? In the business plan, they seem to have a strict parking plan. What will happen to the people that arrive early and are not able to park on site? Do we anticipate them hanging around on the street close by? Currently, there are dozens of businesses, including two daycare centers next to Paisley Park. My concern is that it will cause more traffic on the adjacent roads, making it unsafe for those children. We currently have an issue with the traffic on Audubon from the Auto MotorPlex monthly shows. It's not safe to cross the street there and I haven't seen the community do much to help with that. How can we expect that they will address the Paisley Park museum correctly? In the months following Prince's passing, the intersection at Audubon and Highway 5 had been closed. It took quite a while for it to be opened up again to normal traffic again. During peak times like the opening, concerts, do you see this happening again? NOISE When Prince was alive and performing, we often would hear him playing his music from our house. Should we be expecting this type of noise today? Based on the business plan, they anticipate having up to 2,000 additional people come through a day and potentially have visitors as late as midnight on the weekends. How do you see that effect his neighbors? In the weeks following his death, we were kept awake at night from passing new helicopters cover over our property in hopes to get aerial shots of his house and grieving family. With the opening and other events that the museum may hold, should we be expecting this type of disruption again? COST The company that would like to run the museum doesn't feel like the best choice. They seem to be trying to find a way to maximize their profits with little regard to the community and potential guests to the museum. A fee of $37 would cost a couple almost $80 to visit. At the costs proposed, it would be hard for regular families to able to go. Their policy to only be able to purchase tickets online makes it more secure, but it is also challenging for individuals that do not have access to the internet to see his place. This model seems like a way to gain more profits, and less about giving back the community. TAXES What kind of tax revenues does the city expect to get? Where is this tax money going to be spent on? Will it be reinvested in the community and schools? Or will it help pay for additional police to monitor the additional traffic it will create? Will it be spent to update the roads around Paisley Park to assist with the additional traffic it will create? CRIME Do we anticipate it affecting any crime? This will bring an additional demographic of individuals to the community. While they may have security up in the parking faculty of the museum, this is will not prevent people from committing crimes elsewhere in the community. We will see increased traffic violations, speeding, and possible accidents. MOTIVES The company that wants to run this is not local. They do not know our community. They don't live here. To them, they see it as a way to make a profit. Why did Price want his place to be a museum? So fans could see how he lived? So they could see where he threw parties and what a recording studio looked like? It seems like a way to gawk at a dead man's house, see his cars and other positions. What will people gain from this experience? Are they going to feel inspired to break the mold and become famous so they can acquire these possessions? If the price was lowered, and it was made so everyone could appreciate his legacy, instead of those with large pocketbooks, I might understand the motivation for Chanhassen to approve it. As it stands now, it looks like a way for people to make money off of his legacy. ALTERNATIVES Have they thought about renting it as a recording studio? Maybe creating some place for the community to utilize it more? Create a music scholarship with the profits, or use the studio space for up and coming artist to rent out his studio at reduced rates. This could give local musicians a chance that wouldn't normally to make their own music. Instead of creating a place to gawk at his possessions, have some functionality to it. As a museum, it is only going to gain dust. While Prince may have hoped that someday his home become a museum for his fans, that doesn't necessarily mean that it is best for the community. One of the main reasons we moved to this community was the small town feel. As soon as we got we have seen nothing but development. I respect his contributions to our community and the music industry, but I want to make sure that he is respected in the correct way. He stood up for himself and his ability to control his music. He has been an inspiration to many and I do feel that he was a gem in our community. He chose to live in this community because of its small town feel away from the craziness of the music industry. In his death, I'm not sure he would want his community he loved to be negatively impacted by him. Thanks, Jennifer Singer 8470 Pelican CT Chanhassen MN Aanenson, Kate From: Kristi Strang <krististrang@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 12:39 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Paisley Park Hi Kate, I am writing to you concerning the plan to turn Paisley Park into an museum. My main concern for this plan is the traffic it will create. I live along Audubon Road and am concerned that people will use Audubon as their route to Paisley Park. I ask that in your planning you figure out ways to direct people to take Highway 5 to reach Paisley Park. I assume there will be Tourist Signs going up along the route, please place those along Highway 5 rather than directing people through the residential area along Audubon. Also, I assume there will be directions on the museum's website guiding people there. I hope you can work with the management company to provide directions via Highway 5. Highway 5 is a state highway, whereas Audubon Road goes through a residential area. Please keep in mind your citizens that live along this road. Thank you, Kristi Strang 1701 Valley Ridge Trail S. Chanhassen Aanenson, Kate From: Lynnel.Etling@Eaton.com Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 10:53 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Paisley Park Museum Hi Kate, I would like to comment on the above proposed request for rezoning as I too have the same concerns as Wendy O'Connor and quite frankly many in our community. What's the rush? Let's do this right so that the citizens of Chanhassen and our surrounding communities do not feel the pain of the increased congestion on HWY 5 and 212. This was just submitted on 8/22/16, and it does not appear that the traffic study will be done in time before this will be approved. Why are we not holding Bremer and Prince's family to the same standards as other requestors? It appears as though everyone is looking at the dollar signs and not focused on serving the citizens of our community, which in my humble opinion should be their top priority. If you remember, I strongly opposed letting a variance for a drive through for the proposed Milo's sub restaurant on Century Blvd. Sadly it was passed anyway and was quickly changed to a Burger King! The citizens in this community now suffer with the increased constant smell from their grill stack, the loud car stereos from the young clientele that it attracts, as well as the mounting trash that blows all over our neighborhood because their dumpster is not big enough to handle the trash for the whole development. Also, the city has never enforced any of the upkeep of the grounds of this property as many dead bushes and trees remain missing. My point is that I feel promises have been broken by our city council and our leaders in the past and now it seems as though this museum is already a done deal. It leads me to suspect that there has been discussions in the works behind the scenes to push this through—just for the sake of an increased tax base for our city. I would like to see improvements done to Audubon and HWY 5 intersection as well as the creation of a 2nd parking lot on the property that is owned across the street from Paisley Park as well as improvements to the fencing and landscaping before this rezoning is approved and the museum is opened. Thank you for your time. Kind regards, Lynne Etling Chanhassen Resident 7681 Century Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 Aanenson, Kate From: SUSAN DAVIS <sdavisl0@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 3:48 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Cc: SUSAN DAVIS Subject: Paisley Park Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good afternoon, I recently purchased an office condo on Stone Creek Drive to expand my mental health practice/business. I have been in St. louis Park for 18 years and decided it was time to expand to the SW Metro. I turn at Audubon and Coulter Blvd. to get to the office as will many of the clients that come to see the therapists and psychiatrists at this location. I do not support turning Paisley Park into a museum. There is considerable pedestrian congestion now. It is dangerous to have to stop to allow pedestrians who run across the road, stop traffic. Audubon is a 2 lane road. How does the city plan on addressing the traffic issues? Are clients going to have to drive to the next light, Galpin and backtrack to my office? This will negatively impact my business and truthfully the lives of people suffering from mental health issues. Imagine the anxiety this will produce when a client is stuck at the light at Audubon and as a result is late and/or too late to make their appointment. Who is going to compensate the local businesses? Where in the world are people going to park to see the museum? Oh, I see, you are going to allow "them" to tear down green space to build a parking lot. I don't get it and disagree. How much more green space are we going to tear down for people to get rich? To suggest that there will not be anymore traffic generated than General Mills? I find that hysterical. There is more traffic in and out of Stone Creek than General Mills and the museum will certainly draw more. Don't get me wrong, I like Prince. His loss is tragic and will have impact on the music world and our community for years. His death could have been prevented had the need for secrecy and privacy not outweighed the need to get him help. What this community needs is more clinics like mine to help individuals get well and not feel as though they need to hide mental health or physical health issues either due to stigma, reprisal, or both. Having said that, I do not support this endeavor. When are there going to be community meetings to voice concern for this? Susan Davis, LICSW Executive Director Choices Psychotherapy 612-991-7666 Aanenson, Kate From: J Sparrow <sparrow9419@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 1:06 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Paisley Park Greetings, I would just like to extend my support and happiness for Paisley Park becoming a museum. My wife and I celebrated our 25th Wedding Anniversary in June and we stayed in Chanhassen and hoped that sometime we would be able to come back to tour Paisley. We love your city and will be staying there next week when we come back for The Revolution concert in Minneapolis. We know why Prince called Chanhassen home and look forward to our visit next week! Paisley Park needs to be preserved and we are so glad it will be. Thank you John Sparrow Whitmore Lake, Michigan Aanenson, Kate From: Stephanie Friant <stephaniehfriant@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 7:14 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Paisley Park Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged We moved to Bluff Creek Estates in the fall of 2014. We understood and accepted the businesses along Audubon and the housing developments south of us. We also assumed that at some point Paisley Park would become a museum. We see this as a good thing for the city, but are worried about some aspects that seem to be overlooked. Traffic Driving down Audubon multiple times a day, we will be impacted by the hourly increase of 150 cars (either going in or out...). This is very different than the General Mills plant where they are coming in and out at shift changes, which do not always align with general traffic hours and are not spread out, but kept to shift changes. Also, this doubles the amount of cars per day. I can only assume that individual cars and buses will be coming from both the south and north of Audubon. With the proposed shopping development, it is safe to assume that many non -locals will be using Audubon between the two places. As I have personally seen more and more non -locals disregarding that Audubon is a public - and local - street by either parking in the middle of it or standing in the middle to take pictures (or just walking across right in front of incoming traffic) - I am concerned for the long tern "glitches". Concern 1: People going South on Audubon turning Left across traffic into Paisley Park. The major increase in this type of traffic is concerning - both from the perspective of those driving North past PP, but also backing up into the intersection of 5 and Audubon. Concern 2: The business plan indicates that individuals arrive PRIOR to their allotted time will be turned away. Where will they go? How will these "inconvenienced people" who are not locals create driving issues for others? Will they just park along the nearby roads or make risky turns? Concern 3: The ongoing issue of those parking along McGlynn Drive and people walking across Audubon to walk along the PP fence line. With tickets around $40 each, those who cannot afford it will continue to take advantage of this parking area, in addition to those who make not have the time to go on the tour. The lack of a crosswalk, or no -parking signs, or any other regulations are continuously leaving those who use Audubon regularly to slow down and watch for pedestrians who are not always observant or walk swiftly (earlier this week there was a bus load from a senior residence!). With PP hours being extended until l Opm, the darkness will impact this situation also, especially during our early Winter nights. (Currently most visits to the PP fence appear to be during daylight hours.) I am assuming this will be an huge issue again during the Ryder Cup, but also do not see this going away. In fact, with the added traffic from the PP museum visitors, this may increase the possibility of accidents, close -calls, etc. As in the early weeks following his death - avoiding it by going down another street did not always eliminate the issue. ALSO, will all visitors have to enter PP by vehicle or will they be allowed to walk in? This minor policy requirement may help with these issues (I personally would rather walk a block and not have to wait after I'm done with the tour than have someone park my car.) Concern 4: The Automotorplex will continue with it's monthly cars and coffee. They have made some change with parking, which is helpful. However, how will this impact the PP visitors who are coming from either way on Audubon and do not understand the additional traffic and why people are out on the streets? What about the intersection of 5 and Audubon? And what if PP decides to host events or festivals on the same day? Concern 5: Parking. I appreciate the idea of busing people in from MOA and the airport (despite them not spending any money in Chanhassen). But I am concerned about the business plan including two times the vague parking of employees at another site and busing in visitors too. Where are they assuming they will park these people? Will they use Lake Ann park? Or the public parking ramps? Will this be a free service provided by the city? Have they concerned purchasing the property across Audubon from PP on McGlynn drive for additional parking and installing a pedestrian bridge over the road or a lighted crosswalk? I would appreciate some feedback - at least that these concerns will be included in the overall public comments or not summarily dismissed. We love living here and despite the increasing business development, plan to continue to live here and be contributing members of this community. (I work at Launch Ministry helping struggling 18-29 year olds in Carver and Scott Counties.) Our children are enjoying a wonderful childhood here. We just don't want to see this ruined by development that turns Chanhassen into another Eden Prairie. There is a reason why we live here - and not in Hennepin County or in Minnetonka. Thank you for your work. I'm sure it is a busy time! BlessingsM Stephanie Friant LaunchMinist,�.om SistersUnderTheTrees Bloe Sisters UnderTheTrees on Etsv! Concern 4: The Automotorplex will continue with it's monthly cars and coffee. They have made some change with parking, which is helpful. However, how will this impact the PP visitors who are coming from either way on Audubon and do not understand the additional traffic and why people are out on the streets? What about the intersection of 5 and Audubon? And what if PP decides to host events or festivals on the same day? Concern 5: Parking. I appreciate the idea of busing people in from MOA and the airport (despite them not spending any money in Chanhassen). But I am concerned about the business plan including two times the vague parking of employees at another site and busing in visitors too. Where are they assuming they will park these people? Will they use Lake Ann park? Or the public parking ramps? Will this be a free service provided by the city? Have they concerned purchasing the property across Audubon from PP on McGlynn drive for additional parking and installing a pedestrian bridge over the road or a lighted crosswalk? I would appreciate some feedback - at least that these concerns will be included in the overall public comments or not summarily dismissed. We love living here and despite the increasing business development, plan to continue to live here and be contributing members of this community. (I work at Launch Ministry helping struggling 18-29 year olds in Carver and Scott Counties.) Our children are enjoying a wonderful childhood here. We just don't want to see this ruined by development that turns Chanhassen into another Eden Prairie. There is a reason why we live here - and not in Hennepin County or in Minnetonka. Thank you for your work. Ion sure it is a busy time! BlessingsM Stephanie Friant LounchMinistrv.org SistersUnderTheTrees Bloe Sisters UnderTheTrees on Etsv! Aanenson, Kate From: Wendy OConnor <mnoconnor@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 3:12 PM To: Aanenson, Kate; Tjornhom, Bethany; Ryan, Elise; McDonald, Jerry; Campion, Dan; Laufenburger, Denny Subject: Paisley Park Proposal Hello there, I wanted to send an email in regards to the Paisley Park Museum Opening on 10/6. I am concerned about the rush to get this Museum up and running so quickly. This was announced to the community (& the world) on August 241h, with a request for changing the current zoning from an Industrial Office Park to Planned Unit Development Industrial Office Park. The Planning Commission Meeting with Public Input scheduled for September 20th and a Final Vote from City Council on October 3rd (three days from proposed opening). I have read the business plan and it seems pretty solid. My concern for our community is that the traffic study has not been submitted. As a matter of fact, no other project documents are available for review other than the letters of recommendation and excitement from the City, the Mayor, and Bremer Trust. In general terms, it takes about 60 days for a project to be approved and ready to go. With documents and applications etc being available for all community members so we can be as informed as possible prior to the Planning Commission Meeting. As an example, I pulled a few plans that have been approved. The differences between the Chick Fil A plan and the Paisley Park Plan are obvious. 29 planning documents versus zero planning documents yet the timing of Chick Fil A is longer and it would seem that Chick Fil A will not be drawing in guests from around the world. Around the state perhaps, but not around the world. Chick Fit A plan: Proposal: 3/18/16 Planning Commission Meeting with Public Input: 4/19/16 City Council Meeting: 5/9/16 Letter of Approval: 5/16/16 60 Day Review Date: 5/17/16 29 Project Documents Paisley Park Plan: Business Plan (no proposal): 8/19/16 Planning Commission Meeting with Public Input: 9/20/16 City Council Meeting: 10/3/16 60 Day Review Date: Should be 10/19/16 Museum Opening 10/6/16 Zero Project Documents If the current traffic and guests are already an indication on how this will go, I think it can be managed and this company seems committed to doing so; but not unless there is a detailed Traffic Study. In my opinion, the Hwy 5 entrance to Audubon needs to be immensely improved over the next few months with partnership from the state. I think the Museum opening should be held off until the improvements are completed. If you put the cart before the horse and open the Museum prior to improvements being made, the traffic will be even worse once construction starts because we will have this influx of cars that will be unable to utilize Hwy 5 during the construction. I realize that this is a State Highway, but it is the job of our city leaders to manage safety and security for all residents and visitors, if we cannot have acceleration lanes to improve the merge onto Hwy 5, we are selling our city and ourselves short. In some of the prior development proposals I looked at, things like examples of landscaping, bike racks, & benches to make sure that the proposal is aesthetically pleasing as well as ADA compliant. If all they are changing is the driveway, shouldn't there be a proposal of what that will look like? Will the sidewalks around PP be improved to accommodate the increase in foot traffic? If so, who will be responsible for improvement? Will the Estate be responsible to make sure people are not crossing outside of the crosswalk? How is this influx of people and cars affecting our environment? Are there garbage cans/recycling onsite or nearby? These are the types of things that should be addressed prior to opening this as a fully functioning Museum. It's an exciting opportunity for our community but I think the rush to get it started is not in everyone's best interest. It's definitely in the interest of Prince's Estate. We have all seen the news reports about a huge tax bill looming. That is no reason to put our community and infrastructure in jeopardy. Paisley Park is already selling tickets, the city website basically has it billed as a done deal, while the community members that will endure the congestion, traffic and confusion have not even been heard from and will not be heard from until the Planning Committee Meeting on September 20th, with voting by City Council expected on 10/3 - three days prior to Museum opening. My opinion may not be a popular one, but my concern that the world will be watching when this Museum opens. If the city isn't prepared we will only have ourselves to hold accountable. Sincerely, Wendy OConnor 1702 Valley Ridge Trail North Chanhassen Resident for 17 years Wendy OConnor I mnoconnor@yahoo.com 1612.770.1203 2 To: Kate Aanenson To: Chanhassen City Council Tuesday, September 13, 2016 As I read the Traffic Study I noticed that they have made several great suggestions that I'm hoping will be completed prior to the Museum opening. Since the site will only be closed on Thanksgiving and Christmas, there is no time like the present to execute on the suggestions. Here are my concerns that weren't addressed in the Traffic Study: Parking issues - while the addition of 65 parking spaces will account for the 230 required spaces, there is no consideration on snowfall and the need for additional spaces during the winter in Minnesota. The Traffic Study referred to the planned hours for the tours, but did not offer any opinion on them. Paisley Park has requested hours of 9-9 every day except Christmas and Thanksgiving. As everyone is aware, Graceland Holdings is managing Paisley Park Museum. Graceland has hours of 9-5 Monday thru Saturday and 9-4 on Sunday. Given the size difference of Paisley Park (9 acres) and Graceland (14 acres), I would suggest that 9-5 would be more than adequate time for the Museum to operate. • "McGlynn Road and the existing Paisley Park access locations were not reviewed as part of the existing conditions due to limited activity." This is important. There is no crosswalk at McGlynn and pedestrians are crossing in 45mph traffic. What defines limited activity? Cars or pedestrians? I personally sat at the corner of McGlynn and Audubon on Saturday September 3rd for two hours. Starting at 1:37pm I counted 174 cars pulling in to McGlynn from both directions on Audubon (I didn't count going out). McGlynn was constantly full on both sides of the street and in the daycare driveway. From those 174 cars, I counted 622 pedestrians crossing the street back and forth at McGlynn and the south entrance to Paisley Park. Most of them were on their phones using Social Media to check in and share where they were with their friends. These distracted pedestrians were crossing 45mph street without a crosswalk. I'm sure that the Paisley Park management team is confident that many of the visitors will purchase tickets for the tour, but I can tell you many of the people that I talked to were simply curious. These individuals will continue to come and look no matter how many tours are offered. They are not there to spend $50 for an entrance fee, they just want to see what this is all about. These are the people that we need to protect as there is nothing in the Traffic Study in regards to addressing the pedestrians. This crosswalk that isn't a legal crosswalk appears to be endorsed by the city as I saw the Community Service Officer drive past twice that Saturday only slowing down to let pedestrians cross the street. The Officer drove down Audubon a third time and entered McGlynn. She sat at the end of the cul de sac for about 15 minutes and then drove away without walking out and approaching any of the pedestrians crossing. Based upon that very unscientific observation, the City of Chanhassen appears to be allowing this pedestrian crossing to continue & will be held accountable when there is an accident. Examples of my unscientific observations are attached. Illegally parked vehicle on McGlynn 9/3/16 Pedestrians crossing 45mph road 9/3/16 ��A � �.-� r:;ac �. _ _� � -:_ y .i'.. •,',: y .i'.. z r ^ �Z _Iw,Au �s S��y�, e�� 12.�1'n.1•�'�L�•. ��',/.<''�. 1.:Vli�.`..h �viy.:a�•~1 �-.. t Car stopping for family in the road on Audubon. 9/3/16 .r i„ �� ,A w►, f1 < .fir• ,• 4 OW { Sm,sr 4y, �, t �$ iak-v picture 1 picture 2 picture 3 picture 4 picture 5 Picture one - Red vehicle pulls over into the crosswalk across McGlynn in picture one Picture two - Red vehicle pulls up further now completely covering the crosswalk Picture 3 - attempting to get a picture of the pedestrians you can still see the red vehicle on the crosswalk Picture 4 - Red vehicle is still there and finally goes out into traffic while at least four cars are stopped on Audubon South. This is all going on as the brown vehicle from the page above was stopped on the East side of Audubon headed North. An example of six cars stopped on the side of the road to take a look. Bottom right picture the biker nearly ran into the black minivan. 9/3/16 Uber pick up at McGlynn and Audubon headed south 9/3/16 Drop off at McGlynn and Audubon. Driver turned around and did a U -Turn at McGlynn and headed North on Audubon 9/3/16 Rr M v -49 r There are real issues that continue to concern me about this project. In my opinion it is being rushed through with little concern for the community, visitors and infrastructure. Limited parking spaces and snowfall, long hours of operation, and pedestrian crossing need to be addressed thoughtfully prior to approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Thank you so much for considering my opinion Sincerely, Wendy OConnor Aanenson, Kate From: Nancy Pexa <nancy.pexa@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 10:20 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Concerns about Safety Due to Paisley Park Museum Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged I have lived in this quiet, peaceful neighborhood since October 2012. 1 am very concerned about the traffic being routed on Audubon Road, Lyman, and Park. I think this is just another way to increase taxes to citizens living in Chanhassen. The extreme waits at the light at Audubon and 5 are enough to drive one crazy. It is a speed zone - faster and faster as you proceed. If you are waiting at the intersection of Powers and 5 to turn into the banks, stores, etc. your car shakes from the speeders. I believe the leaders of our community led by the Mayor Denny Laufenburger should open their eyes and remember they do not represent one person -- they represent each individual member of our community. This is a hot issue at present -- in five years will it still be abuzz or might we be repaving roads from wear, having a greater presence of county and state employees being paid through our taxes. Thank you for bringing this to our attention --.I am not sure I can be at the meeting of the City Planning Commission. Nancy Pexa 8680 Alisa Lane Chanhassen, MN Aanenson, Kate From: Melanie Mertes <melaniemertes@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 9:02 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Paisley Park Concerns Attachments: Paisley Park Impacts.docx Hi Kate, Thank you for your letter addressing concerns regarding the Paisley Park project. I am a resident that is deeply concerned on the impact such a tourist attraction is going to have on our daily lives in Chanhassen. As a resident, I do not see the museum having a positive impact - it is not a place to dine, not a place to spend time with family or the community, not a retail business. The only impact the museum is going to bring to Chanhassen is through -traffic.... through our neighborhoods, through our school intersections, through our already busy Highway 5. I am hoping to attend the meeting tonight - I am assuming it is at City Hall? I've attached a document that outlines my concerns. Regards, Melanie Mertes What I ask for the Planning Committee to consider is the best intentions of our residents. How is the opening of the tourist attraction at Paisley Park going to affect our residents? How is it going to serve or impact our city? The museum is not going to serve our residents in their daily lives. Some of our residents may tour the museum once in their lifetime. So does the museum serve our residents? Not really. But opening the museum will definitely impact our residents. One factor the traffic report left out is Google Maps. Google Maps is how people get directions and from Hwy. 212, Google Maps takes you left on Lyman and north on Audubon. These are the roads our teenagers drive to school, to activities. Audubon is a road that goes through our backyards, runs next to our biking and walking paths. Audubon is the road that takes us to our elementary schools. This would take a road that has some traffic at the beginning and the end of the workday Monday -Friday, with relatively low traffic in the afternoon, evenings and weekends - into a highly traveled road 7 days a week, and especially on the weekends. Proposed hours for the attraction is 9am-9pm. This is essentially every waking hour of the day. Please consider the businesses surrounding the area. They are mainly 8 -Spm, Monday - Friday. Allowing such a wide range of hours does not fit in. Traffic on this road can travel 5-10 miles over the speed limit and rarely stops for pedestrians in the crosswalks. Tourists are not going to be looking out for our safety when their destination is down the road. What is the impact of the museum going to be for our Chanhassen residents? Increased traffic. Lowered property values. The museum is not going to increase anyone's property value, if anything, it is going to turn people away with the increased traffic concerns. The other safety area not addressed by the traffic report is the pedestrian crossing from the path on the west side of Audubon/Hwy. 5 which connects to the bike path that goes under Highway S. It is already a dangerous crossing with traffic trying to turn onto Hwy. 5 and merge into ongoing traffic. If the proposal for a museum does go through, I ask our city planners to at least trim back the hours of operation to match those of the surrounding businesses - 9am-Spm. Let's give back the last 4 hours of the day to our residents to enjoy the streets and intersections that surround their homes. Let's allow our residents to enjoy their backyards, pathways and parks. Let's think this through. The decisions made in the next few weeks will impact our city, our residents, from this point on. Will a tourist attraction open 12 hours a day, 7 days a week serve our community or negatively impact our residents? Our priorities should be with the people who live here and call Chanhassen their home. Aanenson, Kate From: Brian <bhaak0l@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:57 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Prince Museum Proposal Hi Kate. My name is Brian Haak. I moved back to my hometown of Chanhassen two years ago with my wife and our three young children. We love the city of Chanhassen and all that it has to offer. The small town feel is great, as well as the sense of community within the city. Those assets are likely a big part of the reason why the city has ranked so highly in the past as such a great place to live. When I read about the potential change in zoning for the land where the proposed Prince museum would be located, I became very concerned. I live South of this property, just off of Audubon. I am very concerned about the effect that a zoning change could potentially have on the quality of life in our neighborhood due to a drastic increase in traffic through our neighborhoods. I moved back to Chanhassen in part because I want to be able to provide a safe place to raise my young family, and I don't believe that this zoning change would be an improvement in that respect. I ask that the City of Chanhassen reconsider the change to the zoning of the property and not allow the opening of the museum. I think that a museum on this property would considerably detract from the community that the City of Chanhassen has worked so hard to create. Thank you very much for your consideration, and please do not hesitate to contact me directly with any questions. Thanks again Kate, and have a great afternoon! Brian, Chandra, Maya, Peter, and Adam Haak bhaak0l@gmail.com 651.335.2076 8719 Osprey Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 the rear lot coverage in the amount of 30 percent by 4.5 percent and allow a 15 -foot reduction in the wetland setback and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision. Aller: Having a motion by Commissioner Yusu£ Do I have a second? Madsen: Second. Aller: Commissioner Madsen seconds the motion. Any further discussion? Yusuf moved, Madsen seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the variance request to allow hard cover to exceed 25 percent by 8.14 percent, allow a detached accessory structure to exceed the rear lot coverage in the amount of 30 percent by 4.5 percent and allow a 15 -foot reduction in the wetland setback and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Aller: So the motion carries. The variance is denied. If you wish to appeal that variance you should do so in writing with the City and the follow up date on that matter before the City Council would again be October 10, 2016. Okay. PUBLIC HEARING: PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM — REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7801 AUDUBON ROAD FROM INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK (1OP) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IOP TO FACILITATE THE USE OF THE BUILDING AS A MUSEUM. Aanenson: Thank you Chair, members of the Planning Commission. This request is for a rezoning. There are some other things that go along with the rezoning but the legislative action is to rezone. The property is located at 7801 Audubon Road and the, as stated in the staff report the Bremer Trust is requesting through the special administration or the estate of Prince Roger Nelson to request a use for a museum. The location again is 7801 Audubon Road is located right off of Highway 5 and also access by Audubon Drive or excuse me Audubon Road which is also a collector street. In looking at the request the access again, two streets and that site is 9 acres and the building, existing building footprint is 46,150 square feet and I'll get in a little bit more detail on that in a minute. So the site is guided office industrial and that's what we're, that's the underlying zoning district that will be going with is also industrial. Everything around this property is industrial and this is taken from our land use map. The property shown with the star on it here, this is the property. The City's public works is just behind that property and so the request again for the museum is just for this subject site itself and it's just a rezoning at this time. In looking at the applicant's request for the site and how they see it being used, there's no interior remodeling at this time. I know I've given you emails and there's 3 more that I handed out tonight that will become part of the record. There were emails that were attached to that. Similar questions asked about why wasn't this treated like some other buildings we've done in 0 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 town. There's no site plan review. We're not looking at the architecture or anything but there are certain codes that will be required in order for this to open and I'll go through those again in a minute so again we're looking at the rezoning so included in your packet is the underlying IOP district. So whatever is silent on that is what you would be following for example the hard cover requirements and the like. So in this circumstance when we created the PUD we were specific on things that would be permitted and then some of the other standards for the PUD district and again I'll go through those in a minute too. So in the staff report itself we talk about what's the intent of the PUD district and does this meet the requirements and we have done that as a part of our analysis. Talking about the 5 -acre intent. Again it's similar to the other uses in the district as far as types of uses in the office industrial. So the existing building itself, as I stated there's no architectural changes to the building right now so this is how it will currently be accessed off Audubon Road so the Assistant City Engineer will be going through in a little bit more detail of the access and parking situation but that's one of the main drivers. So we look at this use itself, it's really a change in assembly and we do this all the time in the city. A business goes out. Another business goes in. It may change the type of occupancy, whether it's an office or to recreation or something like that so in this circumstance we're going from a recording studio to the use of an assembly occupancy, therefore architectural plans for the interior of the building are required and they are required through the City process. Building permit process to get approval based on those plans. That they meet all the building code requirements. They're in process working on that right now so again the action that you're looking at tonight, it's a legislative action, the zoning itself and how it will be used so that is going on separately but we've identified in the staff report those things that we are tracking and again to give them direction on the expectations as a part of being able to operate the museum. And again the main points on that were that we had talked about with the applicant is a perimeter fencing as a possibility around the site and we put that in the PUD because it would be opaque all the way around and that would help deter some of the walk up traffic so there's not the conflict with walk up traffic and people that wanted to look in. I didn't go through too much in exact, all the details of the business plan. Hours of operation. There was no limitations of hours of operation although they've identified hours of operation in their business plan. Again General Mills runs 24/7 but based on their operational plan it wouldn't be much past midnight and that would mostly be on the weekends. I think one of the other things that we are very pleased about and it has been practice out there, there's no alcohol. This isn't a nightclub. This is a museum so there's no alcohol permitted out there. Again in the office industrial district you are allowed to do a percentage of your retail building or there will be items for sale. Merchandise for sale. In addition, there will be snacks and beverages available too so those are included in the PUD so again everybody understands that's part of the operation. Again the intent under the PUD was also to provide some, as they have in the past which we have done a temporary use permit but we're trying to codify that and put it into the code so those would be placed, opportunities where they would have maybe special events. Again all interior. There's no outdoor activities with this so everything would be on the inside once a month doing concerts so again those would be permitted once a month. The only thing they would check with us if there's, letting us know the capacity who's going to be out there. That they're busing them in because that's what they've done in the past when there's not sufficient parking on the site so those would be monitored and Iff Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 again that's typically done through letting us know, letting the fire department know. Our Fire Marshal know that they would be doing something like that and again there may be those occasions depending, and I'll let the operator talk a little bit more about this, where they might do some special events. Some business opportunities. School opportunities where they would do some special programming out there. Again all that would be inside. There's no outdoor activities and that's explicit in the PUD and again that's one of the reasons why we wanted to put it into a PUD so everybody understands the operational function of the building. I did put in here for your edification, I did put a copy of the PUD ordinance and I'll just take a minute to go through that just for everybody's benefit here too. So the intent is to create opportunity for a museum at this. Again it's a change in assembly which requires different architectural interior standards they would have to meet and one of the other things with that for the staff to sign off on is to meet the parking standards and again we'll go through that in more detail and so if there's not all the required parking then they would have to take measures to provide busing onto the site so they can accommodate parking on site so again the permitted uses would be the museum, recording studio. They had talked at one time potentially using this as a boutique hotel. Again that would require going through permitting on that because it would be interior remodeling. Again that would be something that we would just do administratively. Again the code allows minor changes. Up to 10 percent internally so we would just make sure that they have enough parking. That it would meet building codes. And then so then again putting 2 buildings on one lot. We talked about no more than 20 percent of the floor area being retail sales which again is in the underlying IOP district. And the prohibitive ones we talked about is the no outdoor events and again no liquor sale or consumption so I think that's again meets the intent of what, of how we saw this business being used. And then we talked about the parking and the different scenarios on that and I'll let the Assistant City Engineer go through those scenarios in a little bit more detail talking about there's kind of a menu of choices depending on how they get that put together by the end of, when they want to open and then throughout the year so again there's some additional permitting on that. I also included in your packet, if there was questions on the underlying industrial office district. Some of the uses that were permitted so the uses that are permitted right now are of greater depth and breadth of types of uses so we've narrowed that down under permitted uses but again the other parts of the district would still remain and that would be the lot size. The coverage. The 70 percent coverage. The height of the principal buildings. Again we don't anticipate any of those being changed and if a new building did request to go on the site, anything beyond that, anything beyond minor would come back for site plan review so again because there's been a lot of questions of why isn't this a site plan review. Because it's interior work except for the parking lot to accommodate that so anything beyond a minor change which I know they're trying to connect 2 parking lots but significantly beyond that they may need watershed district approval but because they would be a jurisdiction but other than that it would be internally with the City. So with that I'm going to turn it over to Alyson Fauske to go through the traffic issues. Aller: Great, thank you. 11 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Fauske: Thank you Kate. Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. It's my pleasure to go over some of the traffic concerns that were looked at when evaluating the site for the PUD. As noted in the and included in the staff report as an attachment to the staff report SRF provided a very extensive overview of the proposal and Matt Pacyna who put together the report is here this evening in case there are some specific questions to the traffic report that the Planning Commission or any members of the public may have. The first step in the analysis is taking a look at the anticipated operations of the site which the applicant provided to SRF which was a 65 guest per tour, tours departing every 10 minutes. From that they established an estimated total volume which is shown here on this slide for the existing and the build condition. In summary 80 percent of the traffic is proposed to come from the east on Highway 5 to the site with 5 percent coming from the west and then 15 percent coming from the south so they looked at the most, the highest use of the site to take a look at those trip generations. When looking at the proposed condition here on Audubon we do see a traffic increase of, the SRF counted about 4,400 vehicles per day which is in line with what the City has, the information the City has gathered throughout the years. We do traffic counts out here every 2 years as part of our cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Transportation so we do see that the existing condition is close to what staff has seen and then under the proposed condition that section of Audubon between Highway 5 and McGlynn Road would go up to about 7,800 trips per day. Out of the analysis SRF determined what, what's the peak time and by that it means what, at what point in the day would we expect to see the most vehicles on the site. The analysis concluded that a weekday p.m. trip would be a peak which is between 5:30 and, pardon me. 4:30 and 5:30 p.m. during the weekday and then the Saturday midday between 11:45 and 12:45 p.m. Out of that analysis again with the assumption of 65 guests per tour, tours departing every 10 minutes the SRF analysis identified 2 intersections where under existing conditions there was a concern. One is for traffic coming from the east so westbound Highway 5 traffic coming up to the signalized intersection at Audubon. The analysis showed there would be a potential queuing into Highway 5 under the current conditions and configuration of the street system so that was one intersection that was identified after the initial analysis. And then the second one was this northern access of the site that the queues for northbound Audubon would extend past this access and would block the access. So with that they took a look at some level of service improvements and pardon me. Looked at the level of services and wanted to see what type of improvements could be done to the site as well as external from the site to improve those intersections and alleviate the concerns that were identified in the staff report. So one of them is what's known as optimizing signal timing on Highway 5. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has been in contact with SRF regarding this site. They've indicated that there is a camera at this intersection. They're able to monitor that and would be able to adjust the signal timing based on what they're seeing out there for traffic and they were comfortable with what was shown both from the SRF analysis and what they can do based on what they're monitoring with their traffic cameras. The second recommendation was with regards to the northern access to the site. Currently the access is approximately 100 feet south of Highway 5. We would be looking to shift that so it would be about 220 feet south of Highway 5 and staff is also recommending that we would restrict this to a right out of the site just to provide some better traffic circulation and look at having this southern access off Audubon as the main entrance. That would be a hybrid of 12 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 what the SRF recommendation. They had 2 options that they presented and summarized on page 10 of the staff report so it's, what staff is recommending is a hybrid of the 2 options of the SRF report. One of the other recommendations that staff is recommending is restriping Audubon Road to include a left tum lane so that there would be a designated turn lane into the site and travelers would have an opportunity to queue on Audubon Road while allowing the thru traffic southbound on Audubon to pass by. The other thing that staff looked at and SRF report looked at was, and Kate had mentioned as well as the parking. With the SRF analysis the proposed or pardon me. The projected trips to the site were based on 65 guests per tour and 10 minute departures and when we look at making recommendations we wanted to take a step back and take a holistic look at it so that we weren't getting into the details of how many people per tour and how often they could depart and looked at it and made a simplistic recommendation that the tour sizes would be limited such that the on site parking would be able to accommodate guests that are arriving by vehicles. By passenger vehicles so that would allow if they wanted to do tour bus only. No guest parking on site they could do that. If they wanted to do a hybrid they could certainly do something like that and as Kate mentioned with her site plan it provides some options as far as what improvements they would like to do at the site and see how things start to operate before they make any site improvements. And as Kate also mentioned we took a look at the 4 scenarios which are outlined on page 12 to come up with that recommendation and that's also included in the PUD recommendations for the site. So in short the recommendations we took a look at either leaving the site as it is. We would restrict this northern access. There would be restriping on Audubon. If they make a connection between the north and south parking lot, we would again look to have this northern access restricted. Aanenson: Thank you Alyson. So with that I just want to point out in the PUD ordinance there is a menu of parking options depending on where they are and ultimately I know their goal is to be open this fall so not all the improvements may not be achieved by that time so there's different scenarios of how to manage those. Those are all built into the PUD ordinance as the Assistant City Engineer just went through so we feel comfortable that based on those choices that they can accommodate that based on what they get improved that staff is comfortable with those parking situations. So because of that we are recommending that you recommend to the City Council approving of the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and the adoption of the PUD ordinance and the attached Findings of Fact. I'd be happy to answer any questions you have and then obviously open the public hearing. Aller: Any questions of staff at this point? Randall: I do. Alyson I actually have a question for you. Was there any provision for signage at all to route traffic through different areas? So I'm thinking of someone driving on 212. They're headed out to Chan for the first time. Fauske: We've had some discussions with regards to having like for example the brown, the brown directional signs for a museum, for city hall, public buildings, that sort of thing. 13 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Randall: Okay. Fauske: That we would look at having some signage like that but nothing in great detail at this time. Randall: Okay. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So in conjunction with this request can we also consider some of the areas around there? For example, McGlynn Road and the parking and the people who go across Audubon and the safety of those people. Aanenson: What we looked at, that was one of the issues we brought up in the traffic study and maybe Matt would like to speak to it a little bit more but we did ask for that, one of our goals was to try to eliminate that walk up and the operator will talk about how they are selling tickets and how they're approaching getting people on the site to check so we don't have that. That was one of the reasons we encouraged the fence so we don't have the, it's less enticing to come up and try to look. If you don't have a ticket you can't get on the property so those are some of the things that to manage all that, that we're working with them on and I think by we're having that fence would help some of that, if that's your question. And also the goal is they have to be parking on their property. Not across the street unless they were to come back and get approval for a parking lot or something to the like. Madsen: Can the City consider no parking signs on McGlynn for people who just want to drive up and who cross Audubon just to look? Fauske: To establish a no parking zone requires City Council action. We haven't looked at that at this time due to, as Kate mentioned that there's certain site improvements and the operations of the site would not be conducive for walk up traffic. That's certainly something that we could take a look at in the future if we're still seeing high pedestrian counts. If we want to revisit that we could certainly include that in our analysis. Madsen: Okay. I also have a question about the proposed fence. Does the City in it's ordinances have sort of an upkeep and maintenance of fencing which would kind of outline how it would be maintained? Aanenson: That's correct. Yep. So the difference in this one, it is requesting it be opaque. That's why we put that in there because typically we have a transparency requirement. So yes there is a maintenance requirement for fencing. Madsen: Thank you. 14 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aller: Commissioner Randall did you have another question? Commissioner Tietz? Tietz: Yeah. Kate it's customary for plans, not just a narrative of a proposed activity be submitted by an applicant. It seems like what I'm hearing from Alyson and in reading the report the staff has essentially designed a traffic and parking plan for them. I think we should wait and see official plans from the applicant prior to approving anything. Aanenson: Well if you look at the traffic study, the traffic study does have the ultimate parking on there so. Tietz: I understand that but there's, you know there are alternatives to the access. There's alternatives to internal circulation. The staff has a position but we don't know if the applicant has a position. Have they accepted the responsibility to implement that? Aanenson: I'll let them address that. Tietz: Also on, why do we have hotels called out on the PUD? Aanenson: Because if you look at their business plan that's one thing they talked about with the silo building. Tietz: So we're accepting that? Aanenson: Correct. Tietz: But they also in your document that there will be tents in the northwest comer. How do you, how do you. Aanenson: We talked about that in the narrative. So the building code limits a tent to 180 days and so what we said is that, that we would ultimately like to see that a permanent structure. That would be somewhere off the kitchen if you were to go just sit on the premises and rest for a little bit that would be permitted. It's between the. Tietz: So the tents would be open during a concert event? Aanenson: It's one tent in this area right here. Tietz: Right. Aanenson: Yeah, yep. You saw that on their business plan drawing, correct. Tietz: Right. But that would be accessible during a performance event? That's an outside activity. 15 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: Well there wouldn't be music out there. There would just be people out there, yeah. Tietz: That's the question. Aller: Any additional questions at this time? Okay, we'll hear from the applicant. If you could state your name and address for the record and your representational capacity, please. Pat Mazural: Thank you Mr. Chair and commissioners. My name is Pat Mazural, 9501 Virginia Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota and my role here is as a consultant with Bremer Trust and Bremer Trust of course is the applicant and the Special Administrator for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson. I'd like to say a few comments about, by way of background and our due diligence with the operator and answer questions that you might have including some that have already been asked. Mr. Nelson was an international celebrity. He sold over 100 million records. Received 7 Grammy awards, 1 Golden Globe and 1 Academy Award. Tragically on April 21' Prince passed away. He passed away herein Chanhassen at Paisley Park where he had created, recorded, often performed and welcomed renowned entertainment giants from all over the world. The purpose of a museum at Paisley Park is to preserve the legacy of an international celebrity. He was an extraordinary talent and a unique musical artist. He chose Chanhassen as his home and the people of Chanhassen as his neighbors. Paisley Park is a unique facility within the music industry because it represents all the work of one of the most recognized international artistic celebrities of our time. Bremer Trust with support and encouragement from members of his family has recognized that a museum at Paisley Park is the only appropriate location to commemorate the work and life of Prince. Chanhassen is where he built his legacy. Chanhassen is surely where he would want that legacy preserved. Preserving the legacy of Prince means doing it in a way that honors not only his extraordinary work and the extent of his work but also represents the neighbor that he was to this community. Bremer Trust has recognized that meeting that goal has required and will require the best, most experienced, creative, artistically sensitive and community sensitive of operators. The property closest in purpose and an operational logistics to this is Graceland in Memphis which commemorates Elvis Presley. Several of us, myself included went on tour of Graceland. We saw a very high level of traffic coordination. The use of shuttles. Timing of crowd tours. A very cordial welcoming of guests and the use of technology to make the tour experience pleasant. To make it educational and even to make it moving. All matters that were anticipated would be of the greatest importance to the family and to the estate but we have assumed would also be of great important to Chanhassen. Behind the scenes due diligence of the Graceland operation revealed a high level of thoughtfulness, logistical discipline and expertise in the coordination of operations. In their financial record keeping and reporting and the archiving of artifacts and attention to detail. Attention to the artist's brand and attention to the community impact. Great deal of communication, engagement and coordination has occurred between Graceland and the community. All are a priority there. We saw there an attraction that's a natural demonstration of the artist's life. It's not a contrived exhibition. From interviews and having spent significant time with the owner of Graceland Holdings, with personnel as well as the CEO and lead 16 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 executives of Graceland and witnessing the operators culture it's clear that our experience of excellence and diligence and community sensitivity will be replicated at Paisley Park. As this application has been processed with community development staff it's been gratifying to see that issues raised by city staff and by residents are the same issues that were anticipated and that Bremer looked to in it's due diligence, planning and questioning of the operator. Those are issues of hours of operation. Of vehicle traffic. Control of attendance and tour flow. Security. Community impact. They were all given ample consideration and questioned. Graceland has dealt well with all of these same issues and their many years of experience and forms and guides the response to those matters. Just briefly about community impact. Bremer Trust, LPark Management, LLC which is the managing operator that will manage Paisley Park if it is approved, and the family of Prince recognize that Chanhassen is a beautiful, well planned community with a lot of attraction to many outside of the city. You've got attraction in entertainment with your Chanhassen Dinner Theater. You've got attraction in sports with the adjacent Hazeltine Golf Course about to host the Ryder Cup and has hosted the PGA tournament and the US Open. You've got attraction for those enthusiasts of nature and art with your Arboretum. All has been planned and handled well for your community and brings people from well beyond the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The museum at Paisley Park proposes to be another well planned and well managed attraction and a good neighbor providing jobs for residents and bringing customers to your businesses. Since the application the operator has hosted a job fair at the Dinner Theater where over 600 applicants appeared. Many are now employed in archiving and otherwise preparing the facility. The operator has engaged local suppliers for property improvement and will engage others for food, transportation and necessary services. There are other places where this could be done. There have been requests to locate the museum and actually to relocate Paisley Park to other locations, even outside of the United States where Prince remains a celebrity. But Chanhassen has been Prince's chosen home for 30 years and with this commemoration of his legacy we request that you let it remain his home so thank you much for your consideration. I can answer some questions but I want you to also be introduced to several here. Several individuals who have had significant roles in this proposal and they're here to let you know their commitment to making this museum a valued asset of Chanhassen and if there are any questions that I'm unable to answer there certainly will be someone here who can answer them for you. We have here Todd Phelps who's an attorney with Stinson Leonard Street in Minneapolis. He's engaged in real estate and land use practice. We have Jill Radloff, also an attorney with Stinson Leonard Street who has been engaged in the contract negotiations with Graceland Holdings. We have Craig Ordall who is the President of Bremer Trust. Joel Weinshanker who is the majority owner of Graceland Holdings LLC and that is the organization which will wholly own PPark Management LLC. He's the operator who stands behind the success of this project. We also have Regina Gamble. Regina is the Vice President of Operations and General Manager for Elvis Presley Enterprises. She's here from Graceland and of course has worked closely with Joel Weinshanker and with Graceland Holdings in the operation of Graceland. So again thank you for your time. Aller: Thank you. Any questions at this point? Hearing none, okay. 17 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: Mr. Chair I'd like to go back to answer Mr. Tietz's question because I'm not sure I understood it. Or didn't answer it correctly. You asked me about parking. When they provide additional parking, yes. They're required to provide civil plans and the like for a parking expansion. What we're saying right now, it can be operational if they accommodate it using buses and alternatives. Right now there are large events handled on special, under a special events permit where they bus people in and that's how it's accommodated so yes. When they expand the parking lot they will have to go through a civil, private civil plans. Go through the watershed district. Review all our requirements. They're adjacent to a creek. To meet all those standards and they're aware of that. Tietz: Well I understand that Kate. My concern is that some of the issues that were identified in the SRF study, and that Alyson presented to us, if they're not implemented in a timely manner we will have serious traffic issues at that intersection and one of it's moving the north access point down and restricting the lanes and potentially if, on Highway 5 if the queuing isn't satisfactory and if they can't control it with signalization there may have to be an expansion of the queuing lanes so there's a lot of issues that I didn't see a timeline established with them that I think are really critical to the success of the project. And if I'm traveling from far away and I can't get to the site because traffic is a concern or if I have to ride a bus you know 15 miles, like we have to get to the Ryder Cup, that's going to be a potential problem and I think the circulation internal to the site, we need to see a plan that they commit to and have a time schedule to implement. That's all I'm asking. Aanenson: And that's part of what we stated in order for them to get occupancy, parking is tied to that. There has to be a defined parking plan. How they're going to operation it for us to give, again that's the internal part of getting a Certificate of Occupancy that they can meet those requirements. Tietz: But is that 2 months? 6 months? 8 months? 12 months? When would it be implemented? Aanenson: Well they're working on all those right now. Tietz: Okay. Aanenson: Yes, Tietz: But none of it would be in place by October Yd. Aanenson: I believe most of them will, yes. The striping yes. That's, correct me if I'm wrong. Tietz: The north access point is going to be moved and repaving connecting the parking lots internally? You know I don't want to be a nuisance here but I think there's a lot of issues that. U Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: Yep, the watershed district has given approval. Tietz: And most of it is safety and security of folks arriving and of the neighbors and of the community. It's a great asset to the community, don't get me wrong. I think we just want to be sure that we do it properly so it's successful. Aanenson: Correct and I concur with that. That's the issues we raised and we've been in discussion with them and they want to have a good experience because if it's not it's not going to be successful and we want to have a safe community so we both have the same goal. Tietz: Good. Aanenson: So I think we're both marching down this path to get to that point. Tietz: Thank you. Pat Mazural: And commissioners if I may add to that. There are several scenarios contained in the staff report which have been very helpful to understand what's needed out there to make this a pleasant experience for not only those who are attending but those others in the neighborhood and as I look at the various scenarios essentially one of those is a scenario 3 which includes the, essentially the driveway between the north and south parking lots. That will be completed by opening day so that will be done as community development staff has represented. The striping is in process. The other piece of this is that the entrance that is nearest to Highway 5 will be, the north entrance, will be an exit only entrance. It will not be moved by the time of opening but that's something that could occur later. It will be right only and that, understand that that driveway between north and south is what allows that to happen. It's sort of a loop. I believe the only piece of this, and I want to make sure we have this clear is that one part of scenario 3 includes sidewalks installed to accommodate foot traffic and that may come later? Aanenson: Yeah that was, that was eliminated from part of the PUD ordinance because that will come later, correct. And that way we'll see the civils on and do that but ultimately you want some internal walking sidewalks too. Pat Mazural: So there is a plan that's been informed by the study and with wonderful input and talking to the city staff. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So as I understand it scenario 3 should be basically ready by opening day, except for the items that you just referred to and so the parking lot will not be expanded by that time so will you be making the tour size smaller or will you be busing certain people in? How will you accommodate that? 19 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Pat Mazural: The operator is committed to bus where needed to maintain the conditions within the parking lot so we don't over park. And also parking on heavy days will in all likelihood be a hybrid of buses and parking anyway where during that maximum, those peak times those that are on what's been termed the VIP tour may be parking on site but others will be bused. Shuttle bused. Madsen: So when people purchase their tickets will they know if they get parking with it or will they go and drive around the parking until a spot becomes available? Pat Mazural: There will be no tickets sold on site so everyone will have their tickets in advance. They'll know where it is. The tickets if they're sold on site will include the parking fee to park on site and there will be parking monitors out there so that people are arriving within a prescribed time of their tour and not filling the lot except during the time that they're touring. Madsen: Okay. And if I may I have a question about the parking monitors. The business plan indicates that the attendants will immediately review the parking tickets to confirm that it's okay for the vehicle to be there but if they do that immediately upon entering the parking lot, won't that cause a back-up of traffic on Audubon? Pat Mazural: Actually with the sufficient number of parking monitors and with this lane I was talking about, the traffic will be circulating from the south entrance to the north entrance so it will keep it moving. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Pat Mazural: Yeah. Aller: Any additional questions at this time? Okay, thank you. Pat Mazural: Thank you. Aller: Did we want to hear from the traffic analyst first? But for. Aanenson: Unless there's questions. He's here to listen... Aller: Okay so I think what we'll do then is we'll open up the public hearing so the analyst can hear the questions and comments and perhaps address them at that time. Great. So at this point we'll open up the public hearing portion of this item. It's an opportunity for those present to speak either for or against this presentation and the application or make comment upon it. So if you'd like to come up and make a comment you would come to the podium. State your name and address for the record and then proceed. Welcome. P Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Shirley McGee: Welcome. Thank you. My name is Shirley McGee and I'm a resident of Chanhassen at 1950 Andrew Court which is close proximity to Paisley Park. Got a couple of concerns. One is about, did they give consideration to inspecting the cars or if that's going to be one of the issues because I noticed throughout the time when they had affairs there, the traffic would jam because they're going under the cars and they're inspecting them for security reasons so has that been introduced into the plan of coming off of 5 or how is that going to work? Aller: I think what we can do to try to keep this moving is, if you tell me that you'll address that then we'll go ahead and address that when. Shirley McGee: Okay, and I'll give you my other question. Aller: Absolutely. Shirley McGee: Can this be a museum without being rezoned? That was one of my main questions because I have a serious problem with the hoteling part. If they're going to build a hotel like they did at Graceland I'm not in favor of it. That part. Aller: Great, well make sure that that gets answered for you. Shirley McGee: Thanks. Aller: Any other individuals wishing to come forward? Welcome. Lynne Etling: Hi, Lynne Etling and I live a couple blocks from Paisley Palace, 7681 Century Boulevard and I'll just keep mine brief. The major concerns that I have obviously are the traffic and the pedestrian traffic but the one thing that's not clear to me is the parking lot is not, the additional parking lot is not going to be done beforehand right and if you're going to be inspecting cars before they actually enter the parking lot, that's one question. Where are they going to go and the biggest question I have is, how are they going to know if they're going to be bused in or driven in and therefore where are all these buses going to park? That's a bigger question. Aller: Thank you. Lynne Etling: You're welcome. Aller: Welcome. Wendy O'Connor: Hi. My name's Wendy O'Connor and I live at 1702 Valley Ridge Trail North. I've talked a bit with Kate and submitted quite a few things just because I live very close by and I'm concerned about a number of things and I'd like to go through those briefly. Number one. Who will be the management? We keep talking about the management. The organizer. 21 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 The whomever but, and I know that people from Graceland are here. People from Elvis Presley Enterprises are here but who is it? Who is the person that we can go to? Anyone? Is it you? You'll be on site? Okay. And so you. Joel Weinshanker: I'm the management partner of Graceland Holdings. I've been here many, many days. I'll continue to be here many, many days. Anyone can reach out to me. My email is Joel ,Graceland.com so you can contact me directly. Wendy O'Connor: Okay so my question with that is, so. Aller: Ma'am, why don't you just go ahead and address us and we'll get them answered. Wendy O'Connor: Sorry. So my question with that is, so Graceland Holdings, I get it. You know it's Elvis and everything for Elvis but through my research I noted that Elvis Presley Enterprises was sold and then CKX bought it and then Apollo Global Management so how does Elvis Presley Enterprises and Graceland flow with that? Aller: Okay we're going to get those answered. Wendy O'Connor: Okay I just think that's a big deal. Aller: I think that's a good inquiry. Wendy O'Connor: Just because this Apollo Global Management is a privately held company. It's an investment company and you know it's not Graceland you know as we all imagine in our mind what Graceland is. So with that, nice to know who I can go to. So the McGlynn Road part which I had addressed in one of my emails to Kate. In the traffic study it said that it wasn't necessary to review McGlynn Road and so I went out on a Saturday myself and counted cars. I counted people and through that I counted over 600 pedestrians crossing illegally on Audubon Road in a 2 -hour period. Just 2 hours so I know that it would be more than that and frankly I went out there thinking I'd find 30, 40. It was nonstop. I actually couldn't believe that it was that many so, and again as someone who drives past there every day, back and forth, you know I see people. I see cars stop all the time. I definitely documented it and it's probably in your packet of cars pulling over in the crosswalk. Sitting there. Causing traffic. Uber pick-up. I mean there's going to be that. Is there a plan to get Uber cars? How are they going to do that? Where are they going to pull? The sidewalk's not going to be there and it's not going to be ready in time. Where will foot traffic go? Will there be foot traffic? I don't know. You know from my opinion right now the people that I spoke to out on the street that day they're just, they want to see what's going on. They are not there because they want to see inside. Some are for sure but most people just were driving past heading home from somewhere and they want to see. They want to see what Paisley Park is so my concern is that you're still going to get the traffic driving past. You're going to have the foot traffic. We're going to have a problem. We'll have an accident and who will be holding the bag? It will be the City of Chanhassen so my 22 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 recommendation as a solution would be to install a HAWK. I was speaking to a Streets Minnesota gentleman and trying to make it very safe for pedestrians. It's the High Intensity Activated Crosswalk beacon so it's similar to what we have on 101 by IWCO. I mean if safety's a concern, if we're going to have it I don't think that we want to wait until something bad happens. What is the rush? Finally, I'm almost done. So the hours. The hours are a concern to me because 9:00 to 9:00. 12 hours a day is I think a bit much. Besides the fact that the peak traffic time is 4:30 to 5:30. So if you were to actually change the hours to the hours of Graceland, because Graceland has hours of 9:00 to 5:00. If we had the hours of Graceland, you could eliminate the complete peak traffic activity. It would be done because you wouldn't have people coming at 4:30 because a tour is an hour. Or it's 60 minutes so you would completely eliminate it. There'd be no reason to keep that 9:00 to 9:00 or have that extra concern about traffic and concern about people trying to get home on 5 and concern about the traffic signals. The parking standards, I'm sorry I have one more thing. So talking about the holding traffic as they wait, I'm just curious where, we don't know where those people will go so how will when they get, when they bring their ticket in and they're supposed to check in at say let's say 2:00 but they get there at 1:30. Where do they go? So they flip around and they just drive around until it's time to go or they park in front and queue up in front of Paisley Park. I think that that's a real concern because if there's what, 6 or 300 extra trips you know that's a lot of cars. That's a lot of cars waiting so, and I think if they don't have the accommodations for it there's no need to open right away. Why wouldn't we do that? Why would we let them open so with that I think that you know and we just saw the presentation for the people with the pool and with setting the precedence to have everything right. They have been working on this they said since May. Trying to get it all correct. We've been hearing about this since August. August 13' to be exact and again it's this big rush to get it done. Let's get this done by October 6a' because they want to open. Why don't we have it right the fust time? Why don't we make sure it's right? It's all buttoned up. All our ducks are in a row before it opens. You cannot un -ring that bell. It's only going to be closed 2 days a year and then you're going to have construction on a parking. You're going to have construction on 5. You know all these other things. I just think it's irresponsible for us as a city to let them open right now without having everything on that list done. Aller: Thank you. Welcome. Ann Miller: Thank you. Hello, my name is Ann Miller. I live at 6561 Fox Path in Chanhassen and I've been here for 25 years so Prince beat me by 5. It has been a pleasure being here and watching Prince's studio and his home that used to be over off Galpin and we would frequently walk and bike by both places and look at them so please don't build a fence where we can't see it. I was thinking of museums on my way here. The Minneapolis Institute of Arts. The Walker Arts Center. The Russian Art Museum. They're all in neighborhoods. There are no fences. You can see everything. Prince would want us to see everything. Don't block it off. And when I go to see his museum I'm going to walk over to see it and so this is a walkable, bikeable city. We have wonderful paths, et cetera and it's just a wonderful opportunity for us but let's make it an opportunity and we have a walking bridge over. I wrote Kate an email about it. Over the Highway 5 that's not utilized very well right now and I think it could be moved down to the 23 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 other part of 101 and/or Powers Boulevard so that the people who park maybe a school bus in town can use those businesses and then when it's their time to take the tour they can walk over that bridge and take the tour. I think the other thing that, the mistake that or something that needs to be remedied maybe is off of 212 there's no on or off ramps for Audubon. The only on and off ramps are at Powers and 101 so you could alleviate some of the traffic issue if you had an on/off ramp at 212 on Audubon. And the other thing is education. School buses will be coming too and if you think of the school buses lined up at the Institute of Arts or the Walker Arts Center that does happen and those places I think even have a smaller areas for parking so it can be done and there could be off site parking in other places in the city so please don't take away from the walking and bicycling senior citizen like me. Thanks. Aller: Thank you. Any additional comments from the audience. Gary O'Toole: Yeah, Gary O'Toole, 8418 Burlwood Drive. Aller: Welcome. Gary O'Toole: My compliments to staff. I went through your presentation. I think it's pretty good. Didn't really have a question until Ms. Madsen mentioned traffic and queuing and I'm thinking right down the road we have the Arboretum and I'm sure there are other members here. They have a long driveway. They have lots of monitoring. There's lots of queuing. I don't see that it goes away unless somehow the site can absorb traffic that comes in so that they can absorb it. I'm happy to hear we're talking with a traffic specialist but I think we right in our back yard have a very specific situation at the Arboretum that I just don't see with the traffic how this is going to be alleviated but you've got good people working on it. Aller: Thank you. Tim McNeill: We're Shamus and Tim McNeill. We live just south of Paisley Park at Valley Ridge Trail and Audubon and we're mostly concerned about the excess traffic north and south bound that's going to come our way because as it is it's a 45 miles an hour zone and the hill crests as it gets up to Valley Ridge Trail North and it's a really hard intersection for, especially kids but even adults to manage with the speed of the cars especially headed northbound. It's just really difficult and we'd like to be included in some of the plans to make sure that the kids and other neighbors are safe. Aller: So which one is Shamus and which one is Tim? Tim McNeill: I'm Tim. Aller: So Shamus you've been out there biking and walking around? Shamus McNeill: Yes I have. 24 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aller: And what do you think about the traffic? Shamus McNeill: It's very busy and dangerous. Aller: Do you think, what do you think about the possibility that there will be a Prince museum? Do you like the idea or not like the idea? Shamus McNeill: I like the idea but I think we should wait until it's been more thought out. Aller: Okay, thank you. Tim McNeill: Thank you very much. Aller: Welcome. Joy Gorra: Good evening. Joy Gorra, 1680 West 78th Street and I guess I have some concerns if this is really successful what kind of expansion do you have in mind in the future. Do you plan on going over your borders and building something elsewhere? A lot of people have come up to me and wanted to know if there was going to be a Purple Rain Amusement Park so just throwing that out there. But maybe it was mentioned earlier and I missed it but I know a lot of you in, who live here in Chanhassen are aware of the fust Saturday of each month at the motor complex park and that traffic is just wild for you know those first couple hours so hopefully you're going to take in mind scheduling on that first Monday. First Saturday, excuse me. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Elizabeth Kressler: Hi, good evening. Elizabeth Kressler, 1750 Valley Ridge Trail North and I actually had a couple of questions and comments with regards to the tent that has to come down after 180 days. That to me depicts that there's something outside going on even though there's no music, it depicts an outside event which is not in the plan so I'm not comfortable with the tent hanging out for that period of time. I am in agreement with Shamus and his dad with regards to crossing at Audubon into what we call the bird neighborhood. I am an avid walker. I walk anywhere from 4:00 in the morning to 9:00 at night and even our lovely community service officers do not stop at a crosswalk when I'm in it and that is a huge issue. I think I brought that up originally when we were widening Audubon and it was my concern and I actually suggested that we slow the speed limit down to 30. However, it's apparently not allowed so I'm really concerned about the upkeep of traffic because when the traffic starts to get jammed on Highway 5, those people are going to find another way. I know I would. I am all about not sitting in traffic. They're going to come right up Audubon. They're going to come flying up Audubon to get to Paisley Park because they have a tour and they've got to be on time and that's the way it's going to be and it's going to be really sad for our residents, for somebody like Shamus trying to cross over to see his friends. The other thing is, is the opaque fence. Should it go up which I am 25 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 not in favor of. Will it be 6 feet or 8 feet? And so that was not addressed. As well as it was addressed, when do you address the McGlynn parking? And when I came here I left my house at 6:30 and I counted 25 people hanging out at the fence. 6:30 at night. They're not home. They're not at a sporting event. They're at 6:30 at night at Paisley Park and I avoid that intersection at all costs because already it's a nightmare. I constantly stop for people. I know I'm going to get rear ended for being a good resident and letting people cross because it's not a crosswalk so there's a lot of things that have to be done to alleviate the concerns and do it right. We make laws and rules to keep us safe and you are going to set a precedent for other people to come in and disregard those laws because you let Prince do it and you can't do that. It's not fair. It's not fair to the people that live here so I need you guys to listen to us. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Any additional comments or questions? Welcome. Melanie Mertes: Hi, I'm Melanie Mertes and I live on 8671 Flamingo Drive so the traffic on Audubon and Powers and 5 directly does impact my neighborhood and myself. My two concerns that I have is you know the purpose of a planning committee and city council is to preserve the quality of life for our residents here at Chanhassen and so we just ask that we do our due diligence before rushing into opening anything. My concerns are the traffic analysis. They're saying 15 percent would be going onto Audubon. Without signage that we had talked about people are going to use Google maps. They're not going to go according to a plan that we think looks right. Google maps from Highway 12 takes you up Audubon. That's going to bring, that's our back yards. It's people's neighborhoods. It's residential crossing. It's crossing to get to our schools and that was a reason why our neighborhood in the first place was bused rather than walking because of the existing traffic on Audubon was not safe to cross to get to our schools. We are bused in our neighborhood and we are less than a mile away. So the limited signage requirements. Google maps is going to take you on Audubon. It's also, I felt that the traffic analysis was very limited in it's scope. It didn't go down to what's going to happen to our non -signaled intersection by our school at Lyman and Audubon? That's where our teenagers drive to get to school. There's a left hand tum off of Audubon to get towards Highway 12 without any type of a signaled intersection. Those are the streets around 3:00 in the afternoon that our high schoolers are taking home. And so that was a concern is just the really limited intersections that this analysis seemed to take in. And my other concern are the hours of operation. They say 9:00 to 9:00 but if you go online the last tour begins at 9:00 so we're really extending the hours of operation from 8:30 when people come until about 10:30 at night when the VIP tours end. Many of the businesses around there are 8:00 to 5:00 Monday through Friday so now we are taking heavier traffic on all of those roads into the weekend. You know we talked about our attractions of the PGA tour. We're closing our schools to accommodate traffic. We talk about the Arboretum. If you go there during a plant sale, Highway 5 is backed up forever to get in there so we already do have existing traffic concerns in our area that aren't addressed so I'm very concerned about the number of people coming in. Then also the current tickets are on sale and it does say that parking is included so for saying we're not ready for it and we're busing people, how are all of these people from across the country going to know that they shouldn't be showing up on Arboretum. On Audubon. And then my other question is, in the study with 26 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Graceland is what has the impact been to any neighborhoods nearby? Has it brought increased value to neighborhoods that now the traffic is going through and the back yards that are getting affected by it? And so before we open anything I think we just really take our time and see what our traffic issues are and also hours of operation and I just propose if we do something like Graceland, closing at 5:00. That's just going to give 4 hours, those 4 hours are going to give back to our city of Chanhassen. The reasons why we moved here. And one thing that I just have to, I'm a runner and I run these paths and these roads every day and right now as it is, the bike path that runs in front of Paisley Park that goes underneath 5 so that's supposed to be our safe crossing to Highway 5 is next to impossible to get to when you're on the east side. Or the west side of 5. You're already crossing turning lanes so people are trying to merge onto a 55 miles an hour and I'm trying to get to a bike path so that I can go underneath 5 safely. You can't do it now so I'm not sure with all of those turning in there how that's going to be addressed so that our bikers can cross 5 safely and walkers and runners and the people who live here. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Any additional questions? Comments. Concerns. Welcome. Denise Choiniere: Thank you. My name is Denise Choiniere and I live on 8481 Bittern Court and that's one of the bird named neighborhoods that Elizabeth referred to. A couple things. One of the things that I noticed in the traffic study is that the traffic study was done before school started so I'm a little concerned that those numbers are going to be artificially low because you don't have any of the extra transportation with students and parents transporting students. I echo a lot of the concerns that the other neighbors in our neighborhood have expressed. I too am concerned about the hours. I would even prefer it closed at 4:00 so that we have the evening and aren't worried about all of that traffic. By the time the tours are done it's 5:00-5:30 and then it does feel like the same neighborhood we have now and that Prince wanted to be in. Prince biked and walked around and did all the same things that we do and I think he would want our community to stay that way so thank you. Aller: Thank you. Okay anyone else? I think just about everybody here has had their shot. Alright we're going to close the public hearing at this point in time. And then we'll return and put Mr. Pacyna on the hot seat if we could. And I hope you were taking great notes. Matt Pacyna: My name is Matt Pacyna with SRF Consulting. I'm a Senior Associate Traffic Engineer there. Appreciate the opportunity to be here this evening. I hope I took good notes. I'll see what I can do. I know some of the questions I would defer to some of the management staff but as far as, I'm just going to go, kind of run down the line here and some are duplicates so as far as the car inspections, different things of that nature, that's really a management and how they're going to operate that. From a traffic operations perspective, we looked at you know really utilizing that south access point. That provides you most amount of storage on site to be able to manage that internal queue as well as the restriping of Audubon Road. What that does is that actually does allow for some extra queuing space on Audubon if there is some queuing that happens from the internal site operations and so that was taken into account. They'll talk a little bit more about how they manage to ingress/egress relatively quickly. As far as let's say if 27 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 someone enters too early, that was another question as far as the access point. With how they probably would be expected to manage that as well as the north access being an exit only. They would be able to reroute those vehicles to get them out of the site but at the same time if they'd be able to manage that where if there was available parking and they knew, they know how many tour staff or guests that they're going to have, there's available parking they can let them in and park. So it's really an on site management type of situation with how that internal operation works for that check in point. Another question that was brought up was with respect to McGlynn Road. I think the city staff had talked a little bit about some of the parking management strategies. Whether restriction. Things of that nature as well as the pedestrian access that's going there. The management staff, as they mentioned, they're not planning any walk up ticket sales so they're doing their part to manage that. Now there is the residents and just the overall people that come to just see the site from afar. That's happening today and so is there a better way to manage that today? There is the possibility yes through signage. Limiting parking on McGlynn. You know even if it's temporary signage they go up to cross at Audubon at Highway 5 where the signal is. I know there was some mention of that being a challenge as well so there's different strategies that can be implemented with respect to pedestrian safety. There was a mention of a HAWK signal. There's other techniques such as RRFB's which are Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. Those are also very effective from a pedestrian crossing perspective and so I think that would just be something that would continue to need to be monitored and determined if that's the appropriate mitigation that would be warranted. I think there just needs to be a little more dialogue through city staff in that regard. The next question that I had on here is with respect to, really gets along the lines of Audubon Road and traffic volumes there. Where vehicles are destined or where they come from and access the site, that's probably one of the most subjective things that as traffic engineers that we do. So we take into account you know where we expect, you know where your population centers are as well as you know how routes or what routes you could take depending on where you're coming from so whether you're coming down from Mankato. How is Google maps going to route you? You know those are type of things that we look at when we develop that distribution for where traffic is going to come from. Some of the things that we can do to manage that is, you can actually work with Google maps and the other map sites to change your routing for your specific address. So if somebody puts in the address for 7801 Audubon, you can tell Google that I would like them to be routed on Highway 5 and so that when, when a resident types in that address into Google it will actually pull up Highway 5 as their route. So that's something that can be accommodated to manage and kind of limit the impacts on Audubon. We did mention the north access point would be converted to a right out only so that would be directing exiting vehicles to go north to Highway 5 so that would also reduce our impacts on Audubon Road as much as we can. There's another question as far as with respect to the auto complex. We did provide some supplemental data collection on one of their event days with respect to how those volumes change on Audubon Road and so that was considered. Looking at the peak and how those volumes change. It's not necessarily an intersection operations perspective. Yes, is it an increase in traffic? Absolutely but does it break the intersections down from a level of service perspective, we did not see that from our operations analysis. Other questions, there was some additional information about crossing further south on Audubon. I'm not going to cover that. `0 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 That's you know we talked about the traffic volumes on Audubon and what the site's doing to limit additional impacts further to the south so I'm not going to cover that aspect of when we were, as part of this, the working with city staff we were, they provided the intersections that they wanted us to evaluate and so that's what we were scoped to do. Other than that I think the only other, the last comment was when the timing of the study and the counts with respect to when school was in session or not in session. We collected in late August. School was not in session yet at that time for all of the districts in the area. Some were but with, looking at the data that we did collect as well as the supplemental data that we collected along Audubon for the auto complex which was, was once school, it's a Saturday condition but isn't a school necessarily but we looked at MnDOT provides their average daily traffic volumes that they annualize throughout the year, throughout the area and that data that we collected was actually very consistent with those annualized averages and so we feel pretty confident that the data that we collected represents a conservative or a good condition. Aller: Okay. MattPacyna: I think that's everything that I had. Feel free to chime in or if you had one more or anything else. I kind of lumped a few together there. Audience: (Inaudible) Aller: So was that addressed? In the analysis the pedestrian crossings. Matt Pacyna: We did look at pedestrian crossings. Right now the pedestrian crossing at Highway 5 and Audubon, that is a signalized intersection so pedestrians would be crossing during you know a walk indication which is typically a safe condition. If they're not walking during that walk condition, then that's enforcement type of issue. I do recognize that yes there are motorists that come up on northbound on Audubon and they're not necessarily thinking about pedestrians being there and I think that comes down to you know is it a signage. Watch for pedestrians. Is there something else that could be done from that perspective to notify motorists that there, watch for pedestrians in that location. You know from a crossing perspective a signalized location is a good crossing from a pedestrian perspective. Aller: Any additional questions regarding traffic at this point? Audience: (Inaudible). Aller: So with regard to buses and busing, is there sufficient parking on site? And if not on site at another location? Matt Pacyna: That would come down to a management perspective. We didn't look at busing operations from a traffic and parking perspective at this time. You know typically school events are off peak periods so it would generally be lower type of attendance. Time periods when for 29 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 other tour guests so there may be sufficient parking at those times. Otherwise I would defer to the management and how they would propose to deal with their buses in that situation. Aller: Is there a difference in the type of calculation that you do or the results of calculations if we replace cars with buses? Matt Pacyna: So our analysis what we looked at from a parking perspective was really kind of a worst case condition as far as we didn't assume any reductions or anybody coming from a shuttle perspective. We looked at it as okay if there were 65 tour guests for that every 10 minutes and everybody was coming from their car at their typical vehicle occupancy and so we looked at it from that perspective so all our operations analysis looked at it from a relatively conservative perspective. Aller: Okay, thank you. Anything else? Yusuf. Can I ask a question? Aller: Absolutely. Yusuf. Actually I'll ask Kate fust. Aller: Commissioner Yusuf. Yusuf: Is it an option to do a repeat study you know maybe a couple weeks into this when this is, when this kind of takes effect? I only ask because we've done the simulation and we have these predictions but I share a lot of concerns much like everyone else about the traffic condition and the foot traffic that's going to be in the area so I'm very concerned that we have the study based on simulation. When things start, when we start selling tickets and people start showing up is it an option to do a repeat study to either validate your results or just maybe bring about some more concerns or possible additions or corrections? Aanenson: I'll let Alyson Fauske answer that question. Fauske: Thank you. That's an excellent question Commissioner Yusuf and one of the things that I believe the applicant would be better able to answer the question is contracting with law enforcement during those opening times when they anticipate higher than, you know we're at the maximum capacity for their tours. We certainly do have an opportunity to monitor the situation but as far as requiring additional traffic analysis upon opening that is not something that we have discussed at this time. Aanenson: I will say something. Yusuf: That is something that I would like to push for if I can. 011 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: We did put in the PUD contract, there is a level of service requirement in the PUD and so it talks about, if you look at the ordinance. Fauske: Kate if I may. We discussed a level of service in the staff report. We did not include a level of service requirement, minimum requirement threshold in the PUD requirements as when we take a look at that to go and say that the level of service decreased to be directly attributed to the site in perpetuity in the PUD, we weren't comfortable with that recommendation. We had some discussions about that. Taking a look at that certainly after the opening but 10 years down the road if the level of service at any of those intersections were to fall below to go and link it specifically to this property, staff didn't feel that that was an appropriate recommendation in the PUD ordinance. Aanenson: That's separate from going back and measuring it again. I think the level of service issue was there's not all those properties are not developed at this time and in 10 years it'd be hard to say that, to attribute all the changes in the intersection based on this use so we would look at that differently level of service as opposed to going back and studying again to say how it's functioning. Yusuf Okay. Can I say one more thing please? I like when you mentioned about the preferential routing on Google maps. I have never heard of that before. It sounds like a good option. You mentioned a lot of nice things and I just don't know about the implementation of it so yes that's an option but who's going to do it or who's going to look into all the different navigation options to try to do that preferential routing? Matt Pacyna: That's a fair question. I would defer that question to the management. Aller: Awesome, thank you sir. Would the applicant like to discuss some of the leftover issues? And we can start off with Commissioner Yusuf s last question which is basically now that we have the traffic study how are we intending to implement the traffic based upon the survey that we have? Pat Mazural: Yeah obviously it's the hope and intent of the operator of the estate and of the family that this be a good experience not only for those on the tour and for fans of Prince but for the neighborhood as well so I can't, I don't want to speak for the operator but I'll look at him and say certainly there will be ongoing assessment. Joel Weinshanker: And specifically to your question so Graceland actually was able to. Aller: So why don't we have you come on up. That'd be great and state your name and address for the record. 31 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Joel Weinshanker: I'm Joel Weinshanker. I'm the managing partner of Graceland and Graceland Holdings LLC. Graceland was actually able to, through Google maps change the avenues in which people came so we've actually done that successfully with Google to date. To address a couple of the other concerns. So and some of the neighbors because I think Prince was a great neighbor. We're actually using you know assuming this is approved at this time, not to be at full bore but actually to work up to it. We've arranged with Southwest Transit, which is only 1.8 miles away to have spots during peak times so what we're actually going to be close. Every person who ordered a ticket ordered it online through email so we have direct access to each one of those people so we can communicate to those people. To the talking about having an extra traffic on Audubon, the road which will exist before October 3`a from the south to the north will be able to handle over 20 cars so there will be no checking of anything before people come off Audubon onto the property and then we're going to have 3 to 4 times as many parking attendants as we feel would be necessary in a normal circumstance to make sure that there is never ever a back up. Dealing with the buses, during peak days and just so everyone understands we only anticipate 5 peak days during the first 6 months of operation so we don't even think we're going to come within 50 percent of what the traffic survey thinks is a reasonable amount of traffic outside of those 5 days. On those 5 days we are going to have 2 buses that are never parked that are actually going to be doing the continuous you know basically from the Southwest Transit through, coming into Graceland and at any peak time during those days only VIP people are able to park there so you go down from 65 guests per 10 minutes to 15 guests per 10 minutes which is an average of 6 cars per 10 minutes so you're looking at an average of 36 cars per hour so it's less than 1 '/2 cars you know per, for every 2 minutes. So those people, you know all of the people who are in the regular tours are going to be bused in. Those buses are never going to be sitting there but with that traffic, with only 36 cars per hour we're always going to have a third of the main parking lot empty so that would be if people come early. If people come late. We don't have a 2.7 percent gap with no difference from the one before because I was listening. We have a 30 percent gap. We have 2 buses during peak times that will be coming in and out. They will never be parked so. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So you mentioned you will be using the Southwest Transit parking ramp. Joel Weinshanker: Yes. Madsen: In the business report it mentioned shuttles from Mall of America. Possibly the airport. So are there all of those or you just, has it changed? Joel Weinshanker: So I think it more long term from Mall of America and the airport because as we understand it there's issues with what can and can't be done between public and private transit so as we were told because Chanhassen opted out of public transportation and obviously I'm telling, you know infinitely more than I do about this. That eventually with the town's permission we would like to be doing that. The Mall of America would love us to be doing that. KJOA Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 To be honest with you they've offered us all these incentives because they would love people to park there so that they can purchase there but currently and again we're looking at 5 days maximum in the first 6 months where this is going to happen but we've already secured spaces there for this endeavor. Aller: So I'm going to ask the question that's on everybody's mind. What 5 days? Joel Weinshanker: So the ones that exist right now are October 6's and 8's, the opening day and the first Saturday. October 14'" which is the day after the tribute show and October 151. I've given you 5 just as... Aller: Okay thank you. Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: And in the packet there is a proposed bus route. There are actually 2 of them and one of them goes along Highway 5 and another goes down Lyman and then up Audubon through a residential area where some of these people live who are concerned with traffic. Can we, will you have a chosen bus route for these buses? Joel Weinshanker: I can't imagine it wouldn't be from Southwest Transit and again you know your neighborhoods a little bit better than I do. I can't imagine it wouldn't be Route 5 and another thing because I'm just as concerned about the local impact to people who live off Audubon. Prince has amazing fans. These aren't you know, these are fans that are articulate. They're educated. They're really the best fans. If we send the messaging out, and again we have the email address of every single person who's bought and said please don't travel on Audubon, they won't. They just en masse these are amazingly wonderful fans and I'm one of them but they really, you know if we say this is what you need to do to be a good neighbors and Prince would want you to be a good neighbor ... they will. You know and it's very frankly it's been our experience, someone asked about housing values. If you do a Trulia or Zillow search at Graceland the housing values within a 5 -mile area are greatest bordering Graceland so the closer you are to Graceland you can do a Zillow or Trulia search, the closer you are to Graceland the more the homes are worth and we have the lowest crime rate in the city of Memphis. Madsen: Okay then I have a follow up question. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So, and I've been to Graceland. I had the pleasure to visit there and they have a very large parking lot which is off site from the actual Graceland where people can go and walk through exhibit areas and then you have your ticket and you queue up for a shuttle bus for your assigned time. Are there any plans similar to that here? Joel Weinshanker: I think there are contemplations of doing that. You know we don't know, we know that there are a great many Prince fans in the world who want to see Paisley Park but we RIC] Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 need to, you know we're walking before we're running. We're not selling, Prince fans in the world who want to see Paisley Park but we need to, you know we're walking before we're running. We're not selling, you know we're capping tickets far below. The survey was done at a, what is the most of the most of the most that could ever be sold on a given day but I can tell you on an average Wednesday, especially in the first 3 to 4 months we're going to be looking at 7 or 8 cars an hour. We're not looking at you know, we're not going to be looking at you know, for the maximum that they've put for an hour we're going to have less visitors during the week except for something like the day after the tribute show. We're going to have less visitors per day than the calculations were made per hour. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Pat Mazural: If I could just, I'm sorry. Aller: Commissioner one second. Tietz: Well I was just going to ask a question about what's left on your list to update your certificate of occupancy and when will that work be completed? Todd Phelps: Mr. Chair, members of the commission. We have retained an architectural firm who we anticipate preparing our, has prepared and is delivering a report this week certifying that there are no code violations. Building code violations or that there are some minimal things. We think that there are some hand rails that need to be added in certain locations but we've been advised that there's nothing significant in the report that would preclude the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Tietz: But the City has yet to sign off on that correct? Todd Phelps: Correct. The. Tietz: It's just in process. Todd Phelps: If there was an approval it would be subject to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Tietz: Were there Kate. Aanenson: Yes. Tietz: Were there issues with life safety and sprinklers and exiting? Aanenson: No, the Fire Marshal has been through. 34 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Tietz: And toilets. Aanenson: Yep, the Fire Marshal has been up there several times just checking on things. Getting the status, right. Opening is predicated on that architectural report and our building officials going through the building as well as the Fire Marshal and signing that document before it can open, yeah. Tietz: Okay. I assumed that that would occur but I just want to check. Aller: Commissioner Weick did you have a question? Weick: I did not. Aller: Okay. Pat Mazural: Mr. Chair and commissioners if I could add one thing to one of the questions that was asked. Aller: Please. Pat Mazural: And that relates to the management of the site. Mr. Weinshanker was very gracious in giving everyone here and on television his cell number. Aller: And email address. Even better. Pat Mazural: Email address but we do, Paisley Park will have an on site manager as well who is a local person and the search for that person is underway right now. There's a temporary manager there but there will be someone responsible for the property here in Chanhassen at all times. Aller: One of the questions that was asked was there an intent to have, if a wall is required that it would be 6 or 8 feet or opaque or not opaque but what are the intentions with the wall? Pat Mazural: Yeah that was an interesting series of questions and certainly appreciate the comments of Ms. Miller and others about the beauty of the site and wanting to keep it visitor. Actually the wall and the intention to put an opaque wall there really addresses some of the other issues that have been raised which relates to pedestrians and also not just opaque but a wall on which there, it would not be easy to hang things and so it would significantly cut down, hopefully eliminate the kind of foot traffic that we see around there so that the traffic that's in will be for those on the tour with pre -purchased tickets. Aller: Thank you. 35 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Tietz: That's currently part of the aesthetic of the site. Pat Mazural: Excuse me. I'm sorry I missed the comment. Tietz: No that's, you know the fence and the materials on the fence from day one that's, in my mind that's been kind of aesthetic of the site and it enhances that experience because it personalizes the opportunity to remember Prince. Pat Mazural: It does and in fact you know the memorial that it represents and the love for Prince is part of the tour and the show of love from his fans and residents here around the community. I was informed too that the intention is that it be an 8 -foot fence. Can't be jumped very easily. Tietz: Is that code? Aanenson: It does and I think you're seeing the two positions on this. People pull over on Highway 5 right now and that's a nuisance so it's a challenge is how do you stop that so and maybe it's temporary until people get used to just so they can't see something so we're just trying to internally, we put it in there. The opaque fence because that's normally not standard. The city code allows them to go to 8 feet. We'd like it not to have one. I think the other thing, we do get nuisance complaints regarding stuff that's on the fence. Maybe blowing. Some people appreciate it. Some people don't so I think we're still trying to figure that out. It all comes back to safety and it's not just people walking, it's people pulling over on Highway 5. Parking and getting out so we're just trying to solve that between both parties. Weick: Can I comment on that because I was going to save it for later but I would, I would challenge that logic. If our primary concern is pedestrian safety the material of the fence I don't think would increase or decrease the pedestrian activity outside the building so if it's an opaque wall, and I've seen Graceland a lot, it now becomes a different type of canvas. You don't hang things. You write things. Okay and it now becomes, probably an awesome graffiti wall. I think it'd be beautiful but you still have pedestrians that are going to stop and do that and so if there are security concerns for like people jumping into Prince's property or something I get that but I would put on the record that the material of the fence I don't really believe would change the pedestrian activity. I'm not worried about cars and parking. I mean it would be awesome if you had the kind of parking issues that we've talked about here today and all day long, that means that thing is wildly successful and I think that's fantastic for the city. I don't think that's necessarily going to be the issue. I'm concerned about the pedestrian and so we talk about the fence. I'm concerned that we're fooling ourselves into thinking putting an 8 -foot opaque wall is going to reduce people from wanting to walk up on that property. Aanenson: ...there's other ways to do it including landscaping. Some vegetation. Weick: Yeah. U51 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: And you know again for us when you see cars pulled over on Highway 5 that are not in the travel lane. When there's semi's coming down, it's a concern. And not only for that with pedestrians but as long as people want to continue to walk and you've got people coming in, we're just trying to figure out how that all comingles and maybe there's appropriate places for screening. We can certainly work with the applicant on that. Aller: Great. Thank you. Additional questions? Comments. Aanenson: I just had one other thing Mrs. Gorra brought up regarding the amusement park and maybe if you want to go back up and talk about the hotel was just talked about in this one site here is my understanding was the building that's already in place. Any other new buildings that would come on have to come through site plan review. Any, you know again we're not talking about new buildings. Across the street is still zoned industrial office park. I've included that in the packet. There is not amusement as a permitted use in that zoning district so we've never talked about an amusement park at this point or anything like that so any change like that would have to come back through for another amendment to the code or another public hearing or something like that so right we're just talking about this parcel and any changes beyond that we haven't put amusement park as a permitted use on this property so I just wanted to make that clear. Aller: So in the end analysis here what, what are they asking for that couldn't be done under the current code? Aanenson: If you, well can you ask that again. Aller: In other words they can operate a business now. Aanenson: Correct. Aller: To what extent can they go under the zoning the way I'm reading it they can go 9:00 to 12:00 instead of 9:00 to 9:00. What things are they asking for in the PUD process that we're exchanging here? We're giving them the right to do something they wouldn't already the ability to do. Aanenson: Correct. Well if you're looking what's the underlying IOP zoning district doesn't have hours of limitations right now so. So other than that. Aller: I mean he's had events there before. He would go through the process. Aanenson: Correct. Yeah we've had permits. Aller: They would have to go through that process if they wanted. 37 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: We've had significant number of people out there that they've managed through busing so we're used to that. Those typically were in evening hours, overnight hours til early morning so we've, the City's managed those before so. Aller: And the reason I say that is that, I'm looking at this that it's a business. They can operate their business and as a City if we're going to give them a PUD and we're going to fine tune this, the whole reason for a PUD is to gain some benefit and so I think the traffic analysis that's being done and the questions concerning traffic and pedestrian safety are really the issues that we need to get something back and so that's what I'm looking for but as far as the zoning itself, I'm looking at it's a, or if we allow this to move forward we're doing something. We can have progress at this site but the traffic problems, the pedestrian problems that we're facing there are there today and we really need to look at those regardless. So I guess I'm moving this forward to comments from the commissioners on their feelings on the application. Tietz: One more question for Kate? Aller: Sure. Tietz: The $20,000 escrow account, what would that cover and who's going to judge whether they don't comply? And then how do you collect it? Aanenson: I'll let Alyson answer that question. Fauske: That's a great question Commissioner Tietz. As we looked through the analysis and what we were looking for with regards to required improvements we looked at having a financial security in order to insure that the site was operated as it was intended. That the parking situation was put in as intended so typically what we do in that case is we have through this process we have an agreement with the development team. Between the development team and the City. We have the money either in escrow which means a cash submitted to the City and put into an account that can only be taken for those purposes or a letter of credit from a bank so that's, when we looked at that we holistically said, and that's something that we typically do with sites that undergo site improvements is we typically do collect an escrow to insure that it's being done. Tietz: But on a site like this where it's traffic and it's a number of things. It's not like a big residential development where there's a lot of public works and infrastructure installed. How did you determine or how did the City determine it was only $20,000? That seems like a pretty minimal amount on a major project of this sort. Fauske: When we start looking at that, we looked at it from a standpoint of the parking improvements. If there was parking or a connections for example of the time of writing the staff report you know the connection between the north and the south parking lot, I was unsure of the status of that and now they've indicated that they're going to do that so it was a financial security kfl Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 to insure that the onsite parking is there. What I'm hearing from the Planning Commission is that perhaps we want to take a look at the traffic and insuring that the site operates within the parameters or the predictions of the traffic study and we could certainly take a look and talk to the management team and take a look at perhaps instead of having a level of service in perpetuity that within 6 months we take a look at the level of service of some of these intersections and see if that's operating as we anticipated based on the improvements installed. So we could certainly if the Planning Commission would like to take a look at doing something like that and forwarding that recommendation to council staff and the applicant can certainly go back and have that discussion and provide a recommendation based on what the Planning Commission discusses. Tietz: Yeah I think that'd be prudent Alyson, thank you. Aller: Does anybody disagree with that? So we'd make that request right now. Audience: Can I get my question answered? Aller: I'm sorry ma'am, what other question were they? Audience: The question that I asked was, why is it being rezoned? What are they asking for? Aller: That's what we were, that's exactly what my question was as well. Audience: I heard you but I didn't get the answer. Aller: I suppose we want some clarification on why it's being rezoned. I understand that they had, at least at minimum for the simple reason that the City does not have museum in the zoning saying that they can have a museum. So that would be the first and foremost reason. Additional reasons would be the potential for someone to stay on the property as a hotel. Or other uses. Am I correct in that? Aanenson: That's correct. Audience: So when they're, if they do the. Aanenson: Mr. Chair can you ask them to come up to the microphone so we can. Aller: Yeah come on up to the podium and state your name and address, especially I don't think you were up here before so one of the only ones left. Jim Wagle: Jim Wagle, 8411 Egret Court. Aller: Welcome. 39 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Jim Wagle: And I'm just wondering with traffic and everything and then I wasn't even thinking of having a hotel or motel or whatever on site and that, what does that do as far as how many people? You know number of clients coming into the buildings, all that kind of stuff. What is that going to throw into the mix as far as traffic control? Taking away spare there for parking. I guess that's kind of what my question is on that. Aller: Great, thank you. And again I'll go to my understanding and then but if they were to do that they would have to come back and ask for, certainly if they were going to put up or add to the buildings, then they would have to come back before us and get a site approval. Aanenson: Correct unless it was just the existing silo building, then they would get a building permit. They'd still have to show parking. Then we would still factor that into the equation of how much and going back to what Ms. Fauske was just talking about. Checking on the level of service and making sure we're still within that range but the intent right now is just looking at the existing building on site. Aller: Right and if it also, if they were even to use that as a place of occupancy for anyone then we would be looking at other regulations that would have to be complied with in order for them to have a certificate of occupancy for a human being to stay on the property. Aanenson: Correct, yep. All building codes, correct. Otherwise if that was to come down and some other smaller building, that would have to come back through site plan review just like any other application. There'd be a public hearing. We'd look at the architecture. All of that. If it was anything different than the existing building there, it'd be our same normal process. Aller: Based on any of the questions we asked any other last questions? So we're back to the conversation that we're having. What does everybody think or does someone want to make a motion? Madsen: I would like us to consider to designate a bus route on Highway 5 to be included in that so that, to stay out of the residential area of Audubon. And I would also like the City to consider making some safety improvements related to the McGlynn area. Whether they limit parking. Add a crosswalk. I'm not sure what the solution is but I think it needs some safety improvements. Aller: Any other comments or. Tietz: Well I guess I just wish we would have had more time at this. I know things have happened very, very rapidly but the first 5 biggest events of the year are going to happen within the next 30 days and we're barely into understanding how this is all going to come together and how the traffic analysis is going to work. There's a lot of I hope it works right now and the statistics that, and I trust SRF. I know those guys. I worked with them for many, many years but 40 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 I think you know it's conjecture and based upon their studies and I think that there's a potential for some pretty significant issues for our public safety folks over the next 30 days. If those are the 5 busiest days of the year, I just wish we could slow the process down and have more time. They could have more time and implement a lot of the plan before they open up. Aller: Comment. Commissioner Randall. Randall: Is it possible that they could get a conditional use permit to cover October to see how it goes? Aanenson: No. Randall: Okay I just thought. Aanenson: We don't have a conditional use. It has to be in the zoning district so a conditional use would serve with the property so then, if you want add anything else Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: As zoned it's, a museum is not a conditional use permit in this district so no. Aller: Right. Yusuf. I do want to say I do like that the tickets have to be pre -purchased so that gives you an idea that you know how much volume to expect so I think it's going to give us a level of comfort knowing that you'll be monitoring that going forward. Knowing that you'll keep track of how much volume to expect and then we can marry that up with the traffic studies and see how things are flowing would really help the City make the right choices here. Audience: Could I ask how far in advance can they buy? Could they buy like an hour before online? Aller: That's a good question but why don't you come up to the podium so that people at home can hear you. I`ll repeat the question which is how far in advance can you purchase a ticket online. Joel Weinshanker: So during down times it will be several hours before but we're actually shutting down ticket sales days before once we hit certain times and we're actually shutting down hour by hour. If I can show you on my laptop I've checked ticket sales a dozen times today and we've actually moved around hourly so even a day where we might not be very busy but you know if too many people are buying in one hour we're shutting down. If you look at it, if you go back to the site where you see every 10 minutes we've actually moved the general tours from every 10 minutes to every 30 minutes in a lot of instances so we're doing minute by minute. We're even actually shortening the hours on some days where we don't find it necessary so what we've been able to do with this exercise and what the City Council and the mayor really 41 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 understood is we're trying to figure out how to be the best neighbor so by putting tickets on sale we've actually been able to see when the interest is. We've been shortening hours on some days. We've been taking times out so if too many people are buying one type of tour we'll shut down the other type because we don't want as many people and on the busiest day I think we had 65 for 10 minutes which would be 390 per hour. On the busiest day we don't anywhere close to that. On opening day there's not close to 390 people in any hour even though we felt the building could handle it. With buses could handle it. We're walking before we can run. Audience: So why ... return on investment? Joel Weinshanker: We are limiting hours. Audience: No I mean to... Joel Weinshanker: Because when Graceland at times was, first of all Graceland doesn't close at 5:00 so a comparison wasn't fair. Audience: (Inaudible). Joel Weinshanker: No, no. The last tour. Aller: Direct all your comments to me. Joel Weinshanker: Okay. So Graceland doesn't close at 5:00. The last tour starts at 5:00 and they close 2 %: hours later into the, you know into across the street where people are buying merchandise but at times and many times over the year they've had night time events and are open to 7:00. It's really about the fan. There's a different fan. There's a, you know obviously the fans are older at Graceland so what we're trying to do is to accommodate the people who actually love Prince. We're trying to be open hours without being open at midnight. Without being open at 2:00 a.m. Someone who would live close by through email had questioned the level of volume because they said sometimes when Prince had shows in the middle of the night they could hear from 10 blocks away. I don't know if that person's here who sent that email. The museum is going to be a museum. I mean very frankly if something's loud I'm putting ear plugs in, there's going to be nothing that anyone's going to need to put ear plugs in the building never mind 7:00 or 8:00. Aller: And just to extend the set hours now are going to be 9:00 to 9:00 so the last tour would start at 9:00. Joel Weinshanker: The last tour will start at 9:00 on certain days but we've already on weekdays we've already shorten it til 7:00 p.m. so those were really weekends and possibly opening day and the day after the concert is opening day so just on a few special days we've actually shorten the hours on weekdays to 7:00. To start at 7:00. :y? Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aller: And then while I've got you up there another question came back to me and that was regarding the tent and the use of the tent. What type of functions and use of the tent would be? Joel Weinshanker: Just simply so, the only thing that the tent is being used for is Prince's chef is preparing a tasting plate of Prince's favorite food that will be offered in the tent and then it's the same place where you can buy a tour book or a t -shirt. Those are the only uses for the tent. And we're doing it because we didn't, we're trying to change the building as little as possible because Prince had a real intent he wanted it a certain way. He laid it out for tours. He already had tested bringing some people in because he loved it and he really wanted it and we have videos and we have directions via email on what he wanted to do so the test was necessitated because there is no area in there that was really for that. Aller: Thank you. Lynne Etling: May I ask another question please? Aller: Okay, why don't you come on forward and ask it to me. I'm going to. Lynne Etling: Lynne Etling again and it's directed to Joel. Aller: Direct it to me because I don't want to have. Lynne Etling: Okay direct it to you. Aller: Thank you. Lynne Etling: Well when he was talking about his website one thing that is, well a big question in my mind is it sounds like his website is not engineered to say okay at this hour set number of people are allowed to buy tickets. At this hour set number of people allowed to buy tickets and so forth so there's no way for him to control automatically how many people buy tickets for a certain day. Certain time. Do you know what I mean? Aller: I understand the implication of what you're stating. Lynne Etling: And so that has to be manually managed by him is what I'm gathering. Aller: Okay so. Lynne Etling: Because you're saying you're going in and moving around times. Aller: So your question is regarding the management of. 43 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Lynne Etling: Yes. Aller: Will they be cutting off these tours appropriately. Lynne Etling: Right and I guess it all falls back to is you know it seems to me like you know they paid $1,054 and most of the work here has been done by the City of Chanhassen because we you know, it's a very small business plan. There's not much that's been given to us to even review and you know maybe I'm just not understanding what he's saying but yeah it's a concern because what happens if someone doesn't manage it for a few hours? You know what happens? Aller: Great, thank you. Lynne Etling: You're welcome. Aller: Okay so we're going to cut off public comment at this point or we'll be having a continuous conversation. Not that it's not a good thing. One of the best things about Chanhassen is that as neighbors we come forward and I try to run these meetings so that there is a conversation instead of holding people's feet to the fire on time or but I do prefer that all the comments are directed to us as a commission rather than to individuals to avoid any heated communication so let's get back to our conversation amongst ourselves. Roger Knutson: Excuse me Chairman, do you want to close that public hearing? Aller: So the public hearing is closed. It was outside of the normal customary procedure. It had been closed and we just had a side bar. So back to the conversation. We've been talking about additional potential desires as far as conditions. Any other comments or is anybody flat out against it or? Yusuf. No I really like what you proposed, the addition you proposed. I think that's going to capture a lot of what we were looking for. I think that's going to help alleviate much of the concerns that people have so I would really appreciate sneaking that in there. Weick: I've been relatively quiet. Aller: For a change. Weick: I know, isn't that weird? You know everything that everyone has is I think very valid and you know the concerns. It does feel rushed. I mean it has to feel rushed right? It's opening soon if everything goes through so. I'm in mostly in agreement with everything. That we need to be, we need to be careful and work overtime on this one to make sure that everything goes off well. I am personally, you know part of our responsibility is not only to the immediate community around Paisley Park but also to the City of Chanhassen. I sat in a local restaurant a few weeks ago and you know listened to groups of people that were coming in. They were from 0 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Texas and they were from Oklahoma and they were in town for the, there were some tribute shows or something. I have to admit I'm not really a Prince fan, if you can believe it but you know they were in town. They were going to those shows. They were staying in Chanhassen and they went to Paisley Park right to see it and look at it and everything like that and for sure they would go to the museum but they were staying and dining and buying coffee and shopping and those are the kind of things that I hope we don't lose sight of that something like this brings to the city of Chanhassen as well. It does not, I'm not diminishing anything that's been said here tonight for the very real concerns about traffic and pedestrians. Those are real and we have to make sure that those are handled properly but there is also a side of this that makes the city of Chanhassen an incredible destination and an opportunity for commerce outside of Paisley Park I think that we have long needed so I'm excited about that. Aller: Any additional comments? At any time anyone can make a motion. I just can't do it. Weick: I'll make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Weick: Is it as simple as the one that's stated here or do I have to add? Aller: I would add. Add the conditions to their request. Aanenson: Can I get an interpretation from the City Attorney? We're not adding conditions. We're just forwarding recommendations to the City Council, is that correct Roger? Roger Knutson: Yes. Their recommendation can be anything they want it to be. They're changing the ordinance, the draft in front of you or what have you, it's a recommendation. Aanenson: Right, okay so it would be a recommendation to the PUD if you wanted to put some of those in, that's why I'm asking. Weick: I'm not the right person to, because I'm not really aware of what all those recommendations would be I'll be honest. Fauske: Chairman Aller? Aller: Yes. Fauske: Just as a point of clarification for staff and also when you're considering your motion, when looking at the updated traffic study if you would like, I heard both pedestrian and vehicular traffic analyzed so I'm very clear on that but if the commission could please provide some clarification on all intersections. If it is your desire to relook, re-evaluate all intersections or just the 2 intersections that were identified as a point of concern within the traffic study. 45 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aller: In my mind the easy thing to do would be to say all. Yusuf I would agree. Tietz: But how far is all? Aller: Well the ones that were, with the understanding that McGinty is included in that. I mean. Yusuf. McGlynn. Tietz: The immediate, not as far south as Lyman? Aller: No. I don't think in my mind, I think that's far enough away that there wouldn't be an impact but if you think differently. Tietz: No I think it's just those folks who potentially Googled it and came off of 212 then that's an impact because they come down Powers to Lyman and Lyman to Audubon and then shoot up Audubon and that's probably minimal. My greatest concern is still the queuing on 5 and those left turns. You know we mentioned, someone mentioned the situation at the Arboretum. I mean that's horrendous when they have their plant sale in May trying to even go down Highway 5 from downtown Chanhassen it's backed up. I can't imagine what's going to happen at the Ryder Cup with Highway 41 and 5 but. Aller: But those are specific events too. Tietz: Well those are significant events yeah but you know this is going to be a significant destination as Steve pointed out. Weick: I agree. Tietz: Yeah so we just have to be really cautious and monitor it closely and if there's impacts we have to back up and take a second look at it and take another swing at it and those improvements could be costly and I don't know who bears the cost of those road improvements. You know we have a state highway and we have, is Audubon a city? That's not county right? Fauske: It's a county road that. Tietz: Is that county on Audubon? Anyhow there could be significant highway improvements that have to occur based upon a 6 month run time or a 12 month run time and I think we have to be prepared to deal with that and someone has to bear the responsibility. Hi Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Yusuf I think a good place to start is the traffic study. The follow up study and then we can go from there. Aller: But we're looking at directing them and how far that study should go. Yusuf: I would recommend the immediate intersections because whatever traffic we're concerned about on Lyman is eventually funneling down to this Paisley Park so if you're studying that immediate area you should capture that too. Aller: So if I'm understanding you want to go to Lyman? Yusuf. No. I'm saying just do the immediate intersections around Paisley Park. Madsen: I would like it to extend as far south on Audubon so we would know if we need to add a HAWK signal so that pedestrians can safely cross Audubon in the residential area. I'm not sure how far south. Audience: Osprey is where one of the two crosswalks... Madsen: Just as long as it includes all of those. Tietz: What's the cross street at the auto Motorplex there that comes off of, it goes between. Because that comes from Powers all the way over to Audubon so if people got off on Powers they could short cut if the traffic on 5 is bad they could short cut and come in the back way so. Maybe we should just say, Alyson maybe we should just say that to be determined after 6 or 8 months. Confirm the location of the intersections to be studied otherwise we're going to talk about this all night. Madsen: Yeah, agreed. Aller: So Commissioner Weick, you're going to make the basic motion and then we'll add, with the additions that we just outlined to Alyson. Weick: Okay. Madsen: Well Nancy had a couple points though before didn't you? Yeah. Weick: I don't have knowledge about... Tietz: Just with them. Aller: Start with the basic. 47 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Aanenson: You can make a motion and then make an amendment. Weick: Thank you. I'm going to make a motion. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and adoption of the attached PUD ordinance and Findings of Fact. Randall: Second. Aller: We have a motion and a second and then I have, so we're open for discussion and then I have some friendly amendments which will be brought forth by Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So one would be, the one that we have already discussed with the transportation study to determine the level of service at, I don't know what the time increments are. If it was 6 months or 1 year. And then also to consider to designate a bus route on Highway 5. And also to consider developing a safety plan related to McGlynn and that intersection. Right away. Tietz: Could we include something about timing of the implementation of the approved option for completion of the internal site work? So there's, you know it sounds like we can get some work done before October 6th. It's just the connection of the two lots but we've got other recommendations to move the access point and then additional on site parking and expanding the on site parking and some other site improvements which may require you know storm water and so forth but I'd like to see a timeframe if the applicant is willing. Is that something, you know June of depending upon weather. Is it summer of ' 17 if the work is complete? Oris that dependent upon the success of the project? Aller: I would do it dependent on the, to coincide with the traffic study so you're looking at the whole ball of wax at the same time. Tietz: That's one way of doing that. Aller: Because. Tietz: An artificial timeframe doesn't, yeah. Aller: Yeah so I would. Tietz: So the implementation would follow the completion of the subsequent traffic analysis and a timeframe for implementation. Something like that. Aller: And you accept that as an addition to your friendly amendments? And you'll accept that as a, all these amendments to your motion? U1 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 20, 2016 Weick: Noted. Weick moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and adoption of the attached PUD ordinance and Findings of Fact with the following recommendations for City Council to consider: 1. Review the transportation plan. 2. Consider a bus only route on Highway 5. 3. Have a pedestrian safety plan. 4. Have a time frame for completion of improvements. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Aller: Okay we're good to take a 5 -minute recess here to allow the room to clear out. For people to take a break. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Yusuf noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated September 6, 2016 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aanenson: The only thing I have right there is consideration for Chick-fil-A who applied for a Carver County CDA grant. Just the cost of the stormwater treatment. Soil corrections to help give them some relief so we'll hopefully be getting that up to the County this week. I'm not sure we had any other, we haven't had much going forward because we tried to fast track a couple things there so that's it. I just want to talk a minute on the future agendas. We don't have anything on the regular agenda in 2 weeks but what we are trying to get together is a potential, have the Riley -Purgatory watershed district come and give you a presentation so that's a potential. I'll let you know. Terry Jeffery is working on that and then on the 18th we're doing some code amendments and then we still are planning on Avienda, the lifestyle center so I think there might be a couple people here on that one too. Yeah and that's again concept review so with that one we are going to just have. Aller: There's no Findings of Fact and its just recommendations. Aanenson: Correct, give them direction. Traffic study and the like yeah so I think just on another note, there's 2 property owners across the street that could potentially be for sale so we've talked about it internally. We're getting a lot of requests. The staff is to talk to people because they're going to be going out for bid, we want to make sure we're giving everybody the same piece of information so we probably want to do an AUAR to look at both large properties Gig Aanenson, Kate From: kashelston@yahoo.com Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 5:31 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Prince's fence Sent from my LG G5, an AT&T 4G LTE smariphone Dear Ms. Anenson, I wasn't sure if ywu received myfirst email because 1 put the address in backwards. Thank -you for listening to my concerns. I will state them briefly 1) Fans want to see PP the way he left it in April 2) He didn't hide from the community why start now 3) It is not going to deterfans from leaving messages. Why would you want to stop this unless it gets out of hand 4) Bad public relations to start changing things when he has only been gone jar 5 months 5) You won't be able to see the purple flood lights from the road 6) Paisley. Park is a landmark I don't think putting up an ugly opaque fence will enhance the appeal, nor stop foot tmfic. You can designate a part of the existingfence forfan messages. You can permit messages away from the South side. It is already upsetting by changing the original entrance. I heard Prince left detailed plans about setting up PP as a museum. Prince loved his community and his purple army. We should respect his home and all he contributed to the community. Pmkash Elston Aanenson, Kate From: Melanie Mertes <melaniemertes@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 10:22 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Re: Paisley Park Concerns Hi Kate, I have a few follow-up questions from the Planning Meeting I attended earlier this week. Please let me know who is the best person in which to direct the questions. Traffic Study: At the meeting, the representative from Paisley Park/Graceland said only persons with VIP tickets would be directed to park on site. All other ticket holders would be directed to a SW Parking facility to be bussed to the tour. • Do we know which SW Station location? • The one by the Chanhassen Dinner Theater or the one on 101 and Hwy. 212? • Is this for all tours or just for 'high-volume' days? • What constitutes high-volume? • Or is it just for high-volume hours? If this is true, especially for the location by the theater, this is bringing a lot of new traffic to our downtown area and shouldn't the traffic study have included that area (Specifically Market Blvd. by Walgreens/Cub Foods)? Business Plan from Paisley Park/Graceland: The representative said may things addressing the concerns of traffic, traffic patterns, working with Google Maps and pedestrian safety. Before approval, is there going to be any requirement from the city to put completion dates to these tasks? The 5 highest attendance days are coming up in the next 30 days. Any other business looking to come to Chanhassen would be held to higher standards and restrictions. The Paisley Park Museum should be no different. The statement that people are no longer going to drive directly to Paisley Park to just look and take photos because now they will buy tour tickets, in my opinion, is not valid. • What is the city preparing to do during the Ryder Cup and the weekend of the tribute concert to ensure the safety and handle overloaded traffic in the area? • Is this an additional cost to the taxpayers? Final question: I was under the impression the meeting was designed for discussion and any final decisions would be made after everyone had been heard. However, for both the pool topic and Paisley Park, slides with the final decision had already been prepared. I look forward to your response on this question. As a resident, I am not opposed to the Paisley Park Museum, however, it feels as if the city is putting safety and traffic concerns aside by pushing this through without a thoughtful process. I would appreciate it if you could forward this on to the planning committee members. Regards, Melanie Mertes On Sep 20, 2016, at 9:21 AM, "Aanenson, Kate"<kaanensonaci.chanhassen.mn.us> wrote: Melanie, I will share your email with the Planning Commission and the City Council. Kate Sent from my iPad On Sep 20, 2016, at 9:01 AM, Melanie Mertes <melaniemertes(i ,gmail.com> wrote: Hi Kate, Thank you for your letter addressing concerns regarding the Paisley Park project. I am a resident that is deeply concerned on the impact such a tourist attraction is going to have on our daily lives in Chanhassen. As a resident, I do not see the museum having a positive impact - it is not a place to dine, not a place to spend time with family or the community, not a retail business. The only impact the museum is going to bring to Chanhassen is through -traffic.... through our neighborhoods, through our school intersections, through our already busy Highway 5. I am hoping to attend the meeting tonight - I am assuming it is at City Hall? I've attached a document that outlines my concerns. Regards, Melanie Mertes <Paisley Park Impacts.docx> September 26, 2016 Honorable Denny Laufenburger and Chanhassen City Council Members 7700 Market Boulevard Post Office Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: VIA US MAIL AND EMAIL councilQd.chanhassen.mn.us dlaufenburger.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Paisley Park Museum Proposal Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: On September 20, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended that the Chanhassen City Council approve the request for rezoning submitted on behalf of Paisley Park in order for the facility to be operated as a museum. Mr. Nelson loved his home and workspace — as well as Chanhassen as a whole — and because of this, his fans feel a connection to your community. Mr. Nelson's fan base has always held Paisley Park in high esteem, as his dreams of it, and for it, came into focus shortly after ground was first broken at 7801 Audubon Road We have great respect for Chanhassen and are grateful to your citizens for welcoming Mr. Nelson — and us, his fans — with open arms. Therefore, it is with great enthusiasm that we welcome the idea of the Paisley Park Museum but one suggestion included in the proposal stands out to us in a less than positive way. the idea of significant changes to the fence surrounding the site. Recognizing that the idea behind changing the fence is due to high pedestrian volume, we submit that, with the exception of peak days, the largest overall influx of foot traffic has already occurred. Access to the grounds and interior spaces should result in the natural reduction of foot traffic in the area. An eight -foot opaque fence/wall would be aesthetically unpleasant and would detract from die otherwise welcoming atmosphere that permeates Paisley Park. Furthermore, in the absence of a gravesite, placing items on or near the fence is the only way Mr. Nelson's fans currently have to pay their respects to the artist we hold so dear. We understand that public safety must supersede our grieving process but we believe that over time, the need to express our grief in this way will likely diminish somewhat. For the short term, the proposed changes with regard to traffic and access should serve to adequately protect the public In short, we respectfully request that final approval be given to the museum project but that any changes to the fence surrounding the property, now or in the future, be denied. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. mcec Kin Rodman Co -Administrator Enc. cc. Bremer Trust Chanhassen Villager Minneapolis Star Tribune P O Box 823 Bloomington, IN 47402 purpleoutcry@ama i I.com 70 omfW MUM, 7urple OutCry is a global network of Prince Friends and supporters which, as a group, was launched via Facebook on June 10, 2016. The Purple OutCry members are Prince supporters from all over the world; and we have united, and continue to unify, for one common goal: the vigorous protection and responsible sustenance of the wealth of art created by Prince Rogers Nelson; i.e., his recordings, writings, musical vault, and of Paisley Park, Prince's beloved residence and workspace. It is our mission, and one to which we are passionately committed, that none of Prince's work be in any way altered or manipulated with no mindfulness of the significance of Prince's contribution to modern culture. Since Prince's untimely passing on April zi, 2016, it appears that there is very little consideration being given to Prince's wishes for the future of his musical legacy, and absolutely no consideration given to the wishes of those touched and affected so profoundly by the Maestro's work; namely, his Friends, as Prince chose to refer to those commonly known as "fans." We, as a global community of Prince Friends, have allied together to fervently and vehemently insist that Prince's wishes, and the wishes of the people for whom his music and message had such an impact, are not disregarded. Prince was arguably the finest musical virtuoso in history. His art obliterated all boundaries of race and faith and affected millions of people from all cultural and socioeconomic groups. His passing has devastated these millions, not only at the loss of the Maestro's music, but at the loss of the message of Faith, peace, unity, and personal responsibility he so vocally embraced. In the interest of historical preservation, Prince's writings, recordings, musical vault, and residence and workspace must be protected from alteration, manipulation, and/or unseemly modification. The unaltered recordings of his music must be shielded in order to ensure that the Maestro's legacy is intact for future generations; the work of this great master must be protected for posterity. A popular internet meme muses, "If you ever feel sad, remember, the earth is billions of years old, and you got to live at the same time as Prince." This sentiment underlies Purple OutCry's mission. The art so prolifically and masterfully created by Prince Rogers Nelson, in the interest of history, and in the interest of truth, must at all costs be protected. Purple OutCry's goal, one to which we as a global community are passionately committed, is for the UNALTERED PRESERVATION of the work of this Musical Master. We ask for your support and assistance in ensuring that Prince's art, including the Paisley Park compound, lovingly created and owned by Prince, be protected from alteration or detrimental manipulation. It is our earnest desire, and, reportedly, Prince's as well, that Paisley Park become a museum of Prince's life and work, and that all recordings, writings, masters, and videos be protected from any form of alteration in order that the Maestro's work be readily available to all future generations of his Friends, as it should be with the works of any Great Master. We thank you for your attention and support and welcome your input as we continue our mission to preserve for posterity the monumental legacy of the Maestro, Prince Rogers Nelson. Purple OutCry Administrators United for Prince Meuwissen, Kim From: Laufenburger, Denny Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 9:57 AM To: Meuwissen, Kim Subject: Fwd: October 3, 2016 agenda. In re: 7801 Audobon Rd, Chanhassen Case # 2016-24 Denny Laufenburger Mayor, Chanhassen 612-327-6800 Sent via Whone Begin forwarded message: From: "Laufenburger, Denny"<DLaufenburger ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: September 27, 2016 at 4:31:48 PM CDT To: R Stiles <rellen2012(wyahoo.com> Subject: RE: October 3, 2016 agenda. In re: 7801 Audobon Rd, Chanhassen Case # 2016- 24 Raye Ellen Stiles - Thank you for your message. I will keep your comments and those of others in mind as the Council considers this project. DENNY LAUFENBURGER Mayor, City of Chanhassen 612-327-6800 (cell) From: R Stiles rrellen2012CNvahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 3:50 AM To: City Council; Laufenburger, Denny Cc: ibream(n)startribune.com; opinion(alstartribune.com; releases startribune.com; opi nion(cDstartribune.com Subject: Re: October 3, 2016 agenda. In re: 7801 Audobon Rd, Chanhassen Case # 2016-24 To: Honorable Mayor & Council for City of Chanhassen Laufenburger, Denny Tjornhom, Bethany Ryan, Elise McDonald, Jerry Campion, Dan 7700 Market Blvd. PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us dlaufenburaer@ci.chanhassen.mn.us From: RayeEllen Stiles Date: September 24th, 2016 Re: 7601 Audobon Rd, Chanhassen Case p 2016.24 Applicant: Bremer Trust Owner: Bremmer Trust Dear Hon. Mayor & Council: I am respectfully requesting that the contents of this letter be considered prior to giving final and blanket approval to this case regarding Paisley Park, scheduled for final approval on October 3,2016. All of Prince fans support the museum and will support it. However, there are some concerns. My only concerns are regarding two issues which were first presented during testimony of staff on September 20,2016. Those issues were as follows: a)Possibility of erecting an opaque wall around Paisley Park so that "people cannot look in"; and b)An onsite hotel/lodging on the site. These issues were only first put before the council without allowing for public input - but rather included only during the hearing. The public and Prince fans would like the opportunity to express concerns regarding that issue. Therefore I am requesting that the Paisley Park issue only be passed if it excludes the issue of an opaque wall and onsite hotel lodging with that caveat included within any said approval. It is strongly felt that those who will be supporting this endeavor, the fans of Prince, do not want an opaque wall around it as it would give the appearance of a correctional facility. And, it would not be in line with the way Prince would want it to appear. Otherwise, he would have erected such a wall himself. Such a wall would ruin the aesthetic of Paisley Park and indeed, a solid wall would invite graffiti, which would make it unsightly. Prince would not have wanted a hindrance to the viewing of the property by the public. And as for onsite lodging, it is imperative that the public which includes residents and fans worldwide as well.have advance notice of this and the opportunity to provide input as to their wishes and concerns which includes residents and fans worldwide as well. These two issues warrant public discussion and not just be approved without further study and public discussion. Respectably Submitted RayeEllen Stiles cc: Star Tribune October 4, 2016 City of Chanhassen City Council PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Dear Council Members: I am not a resident of your city so I know my thoughts and feelings won't carry any weight, but I felt I needed to express myself anyway. I'm not sure if you understand how much the opening of Paisley Park meant to some of Prince's fans. I can understand your concerns, but couldn't you allow them to open on a trial basis to see how things would go? They were selling tickets only through the end of this year. Couldn't you let them honor those tickets already sold and then evaluate whether to let them continue into 2017? You won't truly know how the traffic and influx of tourists will affect the town until you see it. The death of Prince affected many fans very deeply. I am by no means a nut case fanatic. I am a normal everyday married woman that happens to have loved Prince. When I learned of his death I was devastated. You might as well have told me that my mother had died. That's how shattered I was. Losing Prince was like losing a member of my family. Unlike a member of my family though, I was unable to attend any sort of funeral or memorial service. Being able to visit Paisley Park was going to be my chance to feel closer to him for a few moments and to pay my respects. There are other fans out there that feel just as lost without him and would have appreciated this chance to have some closure. I am coming to the area for the tribute concert to celebrate his life but was more excited about being able to visit Paisley Park and pay my respects. You might decide in the future to allow the opening of the museum, but that won't help people like me that were coming from far away to attend the concert and visit Paisley Park. I can't just drive the 12 Y� hours to get there any time I feel like it. Please reconsider letting them open next week, even if it is only for a few days for the fans coming to town for the tribute concert, or even a trial through the end of the year. The company that runs Graceland should be prepared and more than capable of running things smoothly. They have years of experience at handling the crowds. This really means a lot to me and to some of the other fans as well who were devoted to Prince. He was truly a musical genius and the world isn't the same without him. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Krista Wilkerson Lexington, Kentucky r.?-trr�^aTl Approved by: CITY OF CHANHASSEN Engineering Review Sheriff Review Fire Review Planning Review Temporary Sales/Event Permit Application ee Building Reviow Other Review Date Approved: Appllcadon Fee Paid: ❑ Check # ❑ Credit Card (last 4 digits) []Cash (Recall #) Parcel ldantification No. Legal Description In oder to Sill sufficient time For w appeal from spent* cbri 1, Ais rceommended mat appMrali= be heed at least ter; (fe) arya prrbrb t#e erect. Section 1: Event Details Type of Event: ❑ Christmas Tree Sales ❑ Promotional Event (Open House, etc.) ❑ Sidewalk Sales ❑ Temporary Food & Beverage Sales ❑ Seasonal Produce Stands (NOTE: Additional permit maybe necessary. Contac, the MN Dept. of Agriculture at 651-201-6000 or visit their web site at ht4p./Avww.mda.state.mn.us/1 Name of Applicant: Address: 11.00 u St. _ � Y ; inSi St�lyu Mu 5.67 20 � street oay stab ZIP Fax: �) Akernae Plane: ( Emall: CIO d Ajft�c.��y lyh?r . CGYA EventTide/Purpose: Ineft—t r(r(Ak v ^Y V✓ ' -4 .mob,(iii_ Event Location: Address: l l ( t Street city State ZIP Phone: Alternate Phone: (( Fax: () Email: Q A! t`k- 0 IrVPmf'v' . Or7YY\- Dates) of nvent _ 9 "- j -�' 6-2 0/(n Number of people participating/attending: 300 Number of employees/workers: Provisions for parking and security. 41L -';4a' 0--n f Tfine(s) of evert a PM — f fT I Yc� Type of merchandise: h [� Cooli to Page 2 E&6* 1 City of Chanhassen Temporary Sales/Event Permit Application Page 2 Will there be sound amplification equipment? ❑ Yes �R(No (NOTE: Additional permit is necessary) If yes, describe: Will food be served at the event? MYes ❑ No (NOTE: Additional permit maybe necessary. Contact If yes, describe: MN Dept. of Health at 651-201-4500 or visit their web site at httpYAvww heaft state mn us/dies/el0ocol icense/sneceveni.himl 2001 �})•, k\ b-2 (`a✓ 1 ereJ k Will alcohol be served at the event? ❑ YesNo (NOTE: Additional permit is necessary and food If yes, describe: service is required by the same vendor serving alcohol) Will there be signage at the event? ❑ Yes �<No (NOTE: Additional permits maybe necessary) If yes, describe: Other pertinent information: Please attach a site plan or survey which accurately represents existing conditions on the site Including • Entrances and exits • Parking and driving areas • Proposed location of temporary structures including tents, stages, booths, first-aidlreYef stations, dumpstere, portable toilets, sound amplification equipment, etc. • Proposed location of sign • Other Information If deemed necessary r1ame of Property Owner T Contact, n Address: ' • > • • it f Fax: Altemate Phone: (-- Email: 6t& k1C[Lca% 2) drQrho✓ ocm Notice I have tamtluVb*d Myself With to Chenhaasen City Code Chanter 24964 fr moorary Outdoor sal _ i and subsequerit adimnae amerwrierb pertalNrg awrsto, and vAl abbe by the provl•lam ow tsined aarein. I dayars that Me Irdomlatbn 1 have provided an mil appilostl Is truthful and I uderstwO awl reWamaon of aralwws on th6 applembn Will result In deMa1 al the appllnlbn. I authortre the Cay of Charrtreesen to investigate and mak muttever inquiries are rwc•saery to vwfy tlw prwlded. Applicant's printed name Applicant's signatu e DAe Property owner'slManagers printed frame Property owner (Managers signature e,Wrvaar%V•ar••vrnarsr nisi "M• CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND IIENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 511 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 ZONING CHANHASSEN CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 20-312 is hereby amended and renumbered as follows: Sec. 20-964. — Temporary outdoor events, seasonal and sidewalk sales activities. (1) Purpose. Temporary outdoor events, seasonal and sidewalk sales activities in a business, office, commercial, institutional or industrial districts are subject to issuance of an administrative permit and the requirements of this section. It is the intent of this section to provide for temporary outdoor events, seasonal and sidewalk sales activities which are distinguished from permanent outside business activities that are allowed only by conditional use permit or interim use permit approved by the city council. It is the intent of this section to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating temporary outdoor events, seasonal and sidewalk sales activities in the following manner: a. Establish standards which permit businesses an opportunity to conduct temporary outdoor sales; Ensure that temporary outdoor events, seasonal and sidewalk sales activities do not create safety hazards by occupying required parking spaces, emergency access, or impede the efficient movement of pedestrian and vehicular traffic; b. Provide standards, guidelines, and procedures for an administrative review of temporary outdoor events, seasonal and sidewalk sales permits; C. Provide a means of allowing citywide retail promotions; d. Allow certain uses which are seasonal in nature, while providing standards that will assure compatibility with the underlying zoning district and adjacent property; e. Provide the public with direct access to homegrown produce; Allow temporary events, seasonal and sidewalk sales activities which require an outdoor location; and g. Limit temporary outdoor sales to activities which are short-term or seasonal and which do not require permanent improvements to the site. I Allow temporary outdoor events such as concerts, car shows, customer appreciation, business employee appreciation, etc. (2) Findings. The city finds it necessary for the promotion and preservation of the public health, safety, welfare and aesthetics of the community that the location, size, and appearance of temporary outdoor events, seasonal and sidewalk sales activities be controlled. Further, the city finds that: a. Outdoor sales and displays have a direct impact on and a relationship to the image of the community; b. An opportunity for merchants to sell produce and seasonal merchandise are an integral component of economic development; C. Temporary outdoor events, seasonal or sidewalk sales activities may present an obstacle to effective firefighting and other emergency services by blocking necessary exits, fire lanes, or turnaround areas; d. Uncontrolled and unlimited outdoor sales and displays adversely impact the image and aesthetics of the community and, thereby, undermine economic value and growth; and e. Uncontrolled temporary outdoor events, seasonal and sidewalk sales activities may conflict with existing and neighboring uses. (3) Application for permit. No person shall engage in any temporary outdoor event, seasonal or sidewalk sales activity without a permit issued pursuant to this section. The application of a permit shall be made as follows: a. Application for an administrative permit for a temporary outdoor event, seasonal, or sidewalk sales activity shall be made by the property owner to the community development director on forms to be provided by the city at least ten business days prior to the date of the requested activity. b. A written description of the proposed use including requested length of permit and hours of operation shall be included on the application. C. Disputes as to administrative application of the requirements of this section shall be referred to the planning commission and to the city council for review. d. The application shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee which shall be imposed in accordance with the fee schedule established by the city council. The intent of this section is to recover costs associated with administering this ordinance. Permit fees shall reflect the costs of reviewing and processing permits, as well as costs associated with periodic enforcement activities and compliance checks. (4) Required information and plans. The applicant shall provide the following information and plans: a. A concise statement describing the proposed activity, including the purpose, type of merchandise involved, dates and times of operation, number of employees involved, provisions for on-site security, provisions for on-site parking, name of person or organization requesting permit, and other pertinent information required by the planning director to fully evaluate the application; b. The community development director may require a copy of an approved site plan, drawn to scale, for the property or an "as -built" survey, which accurately represents existing conditions on the site, including entrances and exits, and bona fide parking and driving areas, and which accurately indicates any proposed temporary structures, including tents, stands, and signs; C. An accurate floor plan of any building on the property, when, in the judgment of the community development director, such a plan is necessary to properly evaluate the location of the activity and the effectiveness of building entrances and exits. (5) Procedure. The application will be processed as follows: a. The community development director shall review applications for administrative permits and shall determine if the proposal is in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, and the specific standards for temporary outdoor events, seasonal or sidewalk sales activities as set forth in this section. The application shall also be reviewed by the public safety department and/or other appropriate review agencies. b. A written permit shall be issued to the applicant. Specific conditions to assure compliance with applicable codes, ordinances, and the standards in this section shall be attached to the permit. C. Determination of noncompliance with applicable codes, ordinances, and the standards in this subsection shall be communicated to the applicant and the application for the permit shall be considered denied; unless, within ten days of the date of such notice, the applicant submits revised plans and/or information with which the planning director is able to determine compliance. (6) Criteria for approval. Criteria for permit approval includes the following: a. The temporary outdoor event, seasonal or sidewalk sales activity shall be clearly accessory to or promotive of the permitted or conditional use approved for the site. Only merchandise which is normally sold or stocked by the occupant(s) on the subject premises shall be sold and/or promoted, provided that seasonal merchandise and produce may be allowed. (retail only where retail is permitted) b. Tents, stands, and other similar temporary structures and temporary vehicles and mobile equipment may be utilized, provided they are clearly identified on the submitted plan and provided that it is determined by the community development director that they will not impair the parking capacity, emergency access, or the safe and efficient movement of pedestrian and vehicular traffic on or off the site. C. The submitted plan shall clearly demonstrate that adequate off-street parking for the proposed activity can and will be provided for the duration of the activity. Determination of compliance with this requirement shall be made by the planning director, who shall consider the nature of the activity and the applicable parking requirements of the City Code. Consideration shall be given to the parking needs and requirements of other occupants in the case of multitenant buildings. d. Property owners and tenants' signature(s) are required to locate a temporary outdoor event, seasonal or sidewalk sales activity on private property and/or in front of another tenant's space. e. The temporary outdoor event, seasonal or sidewalk sales activity must be consistent with other uses permitted in the zoning district. No use that is prohibited in a zoning district shall be allowed as a temporary outdoor sale or activity. (7) Limitations; general conditions. a. Permitted temporary outdoor sales activities are limited to the following: Christmas tree sales. ii. Seasonal produce stands. iii. Temporary food and beverage sales. iv. Sidewalk sales. b. The following shall apply to all proposed temporary outdoor event, seasonal or sidewalk sales activities allowed by this section in addition to other applicable building and safety code requirements as determined by the planning director. i. Christmas tree sales and produce stands shall be for the period specified in the administrative permit and, in no case, shall exceed 120 days per calendar year per property or center. There shall be no more than three sales activities per year per property or center. ii. Temporary outdoor events and food and beverage sales prepared on-site and sidewalk sales shall be permitted for the period specified in the administrative permit and, in no case, shall exceed 15 days per calendar year per property or center with a maximum of a three-day display period. iii. Christmas tree sales shall expire December 26. iv. The site shall be cleared and all remaining debris removed from the sales site on the last remaining day of the permit. V. Acceptable space for off-street parking and traffic circulation generated by the use must be provided. Club and gutter with drive approaches is desired to provide safe tum movements. vi. Lighting shall be compatible with surrounding adjacent uses. vii. Hours of operation shall be compatible with adjacent uses. viii. Signage should be limited to window signs, and one outdoor sign no greater than 24 square feet. Special signage for purposes of traffic direction and control may be authorized by the planning director. ix. Front yard, side yard, and rear yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten feet. X. All other pertinent city and state permits must be obtained. xi. The approved permit shall be kept on the premises for the duration of the activity. xii. No outside speaker systems shall be allowed without approval from the city. C. The following shall apply to all proposed temporary outdoor display activities allowed by this section in addition to other applicable building and safety code requirements as determined by the planning director: i. Display may not interfere with pedestrian access. ii. Display may not occupy required parking spaces. iii. Display must be located adjacent to primary structure. iv. Display may not have separate lighting from primary structure. V. Erection of display is permitted during business hours only. (8) Administration and enforcement. a. The community development director may, upon written notice, suspend or revoke the temporary outdoor event, seasonal, or sidewalk sales permit of any person who violates any of the provisions of this section or any of the conditions of the permit. b. If, at any time, a permit under the provisions of this section is suspended or revoked, it shall thereafter be unlawful for that person or organization to operate, open, maintain, manage or conduct any temporary outdoor event, seasonal, or sidewalk sales. C. Violation of an issued permit or the provisions of this section may be grounds for denial of future permit applications during a calendar year. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this l lm day of October, 2010, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on October 21, 20 10) f3 Carver County Courthouse First Judicial District Attn. District Judge Kevin Eide Carver County Justice Center 604 East 4th Street Chaska, MN 55318 Bremer Trust Attn. Mr. Prince Nelson court-appointed trustee(s) 360 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Chanhassen, MN August 6th, 2016 Dear Judge Eide and Bremer Trustees, I am a Lake Lucy neighbor to one of Mr. Prince Nelson's natural land holaings that I now understand will be marketed to maximize proceeds. Said property has gate house -access off of Route 41S in Chanhassen and sits between Lake Lucy and Lake Ann. The land in comprised of a large forested, lakefront area and significant wetlands. There are no structures on the property except for a small gate house and a fence off of Route 41 S. Our view of the property is attached. Please be informed that there are bald eagles, loons, various owl species and potentially other bird species, which are protected to varying degrees, nesting on and/or near the land on said lakes. We have almost daily sightings of said bird species on the lake fishing directly in front of ours and the late Mr. Nelson's properties. I believe that you have an obligation to make prospective developers and other buyers aware of this and oversee that any development strictly follows all federal and state environmental statutes and permitting processes. While I understand that you have a fiduciary duty to maximize proceeds, I implore you to do so environmentally responsibly and not allow a serial builder to destroy the beautiful land by putting up "MacMansions." The property is sizable and the City of Chanhassen has a recent -year history of allowing very small subdivisions of larger parcels, certainly relative to past practices. An option, which could still maximize the financial proceeds, might be to sell to the Nature Conservancy or another, similarly reputable environmental preservation organization. As a last resort, I would like to also be given the opportunity to also bid on it. It is likely outside of my financial capacity but, should I personally be able to afford it, my intention would be to leave it completely untouched. I ask that you make Ms. Tyke Nelson and any other qualified heirs and appointed decision makers in this matter aware of my letter. I have to assume that the land held a special meaning to Mr. Nelson given that he owned it for so many years, including after lovingly bringing it back to its original natural state. Judge Eide, it is possible that my letter will fail to reach the correct Bremer Trust attorney so I would be very grateful if your office would assist in sending a copy of this letter to the correct individual(s) there. Sincerely, Bo Andersen 1695 Steller Court Chanhassen (mail address Excelsior) MN 55331 612 670 0682 bolandersen@aim.com K.: Minnesota DNR Central Office 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul MN 55155-4040 Worldwide Office The Nature Conservancy 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22203-1606 The Nature Conservancy in Minnesota 1101 West River Parkway, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55415-1291 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 Mr. Dennis Anderson, Star Tribune danderson@startribune.com So Andersen, Angela Brown 1695 Steller Court Excelsior, MN 55331 MINNEAPOLIS MN : 06 AYJG 2016 PW RECEIVED Co Kate Adne Community Development Director City of Chanhassen AUG 0 8 2016 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen CITY Of CHANHASSEN MN 55317 65317—Ci363v.0 vrrltt�ItHutih4l�it tI�Ilnuh -11- 1,1111 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT PAISLEY PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT dated October 24, 2016, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and Paisley Park Facility, LLC. BACKGROUND. A. The City has approved a rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park to Planned Unit Development ("PUD"). The PUD requires the Developer to enter in this Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 2. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall construct the following improvements by the dates indicated: A. Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left tum lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. B. Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. C. Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to 'Bus Only" and 'Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. A permanent barrier island should be placed in the access to control the right-in/right-out. 1880550 W-51n,eJ D. A traffic study shall be completed at 6 and 12 months, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. E. Landscaping shall be planted by spring of 2017 and maintained per the PUD. 3. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 4. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $25,000.00. 5. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. B. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. D. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property and/or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. E. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other 1880550 agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. F. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. G. The Developer represents to the City that the development complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 6. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 7. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Paisley Park Facility, LLC, c/o Bremer Trust, National Association, 1100 West St. Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, PO Box147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317- 0147. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 1880550 CITY OF CHANHASSEN lel'i (SEAL) AND: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Denny Laufenburger, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2016, by Denny Laufenburger and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 1880550 DEVELOPER: PAISLEY PARK FACILITY, LLC 0 Its: STATE OF ) (ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2016, by the of NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 AMP/cjh 1880550 101_16X"". 0,1 ► CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA In Re: Application of PRN Music Corporation FINDINGS OF FACT for a Rezoning of Property legally described as AND DECISION Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Planning Case No. 2016-24 On October 24, 2016, the City Council met to consider the application of PRN Music Corporation to rezone property from IOP -Industrial Office Park to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The City Council of the City of Chanhassen hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and Decision in the above -captioned matter: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned IOP -Industrial Office Park. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial. 3. The description of the property is: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 4. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. 6. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. 7. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. 8. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 189252A Ab 9. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 10. The museum will create new jobs in the City and the tourism will support the existing business. 11. The Planning Report No. 2016-24, dated September 20, 2016, prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council approves the rezoning to Planned Unit Development. Dated: October 24, 2016 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ]s9252vl 2 BY: Denny Laufenburger, Mayor AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager IN CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City s zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, MN Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District shall apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted: 1. Museum. 2. Recording studio. 3. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than twenty percent (20%) of the floor space is used for retail sales. These sales may include food, beverages and memorabilia. 4. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each concert. 5. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each event. 6. Office. 7. Multiple buildings on a lot. C. Conditional Uses. The following conditional use is permitted: 1. Hotel. d. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 1890870 1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses. 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. e. Materials and Design Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. E Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -in for buses only and right -out only for buses, and passenger vehicles. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 24, 2016. 5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses, junipers and barberry. g. Parking 1. Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access. 4. All required permits, including from the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. 5. The north access shall be limited to a right -in for buses only and right -out of the site for buses and passenger vehicles. 1890873 6. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the SRF study. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus. 8. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shall be by bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest cars per hour maximum. 9. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking or guests shall be bused to and from the site. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20 day of October, 2016, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on November 3, 2016) 3 1890870 PROPOSED MOTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motions: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11 Block 1 Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance and Finding of Fact." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant Bremer Trust National Association, the Special Administrator of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate a museum at Paisley Park. They are requesting a rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow a museum as a permitted use in the zoning district. LOCATION: 7801 Audubon Road (Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park) APPLICANT: PRN Music Corporation 1100 West St. Germain Street St. Cloud, MN 55447-4443 AAHauck(a.Bremer.com PRESENT ZONING: Industrial Office Park (IOP) 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office Industrial ACREAGE: approximately 9 acres LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning because the city is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A PUD must be consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The site is currently zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP). A museum is not a permitted use in this district. A museum is permitted in the Office Institutional District zoning district however, this district would not permit other uses that are currently contained or proposed at Paisley Park including the recording studios, special events or boutique hotel. By rezoning the property to PUD the city can set the standards for use of the property. The staff is recommending rezoning the site to PUD with the IOP as the underlying district except as amended. `To i�-� k;1�2 ��31� Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 2 of 18 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20 Article VIII, Planned Unit Development District IOP District Standards EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is bordered by TH 5 on the north, Audubon Road on the west, the city's public works on the south, and wetland with a stream running through it on the east. Access to the site is gained via two drives off of Audubon Road. Paisley Park was built in 1986 as a recording studio. The 9 - acre site contains an existing building with a footprint of 46,150 square feet. Location Map Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 3 of 18 i BACKGROUND o m n 7 1986 Site plan Paisley Park Facility has entered into an Exhibition Operating Agreement with PPARK Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Graceland Holdings, LLC to operate the Exhibition. The operations of the museum based on the Business Plan include: • No exterior construction other than relating to the parking lot and perimeter fencing. • Plan to be open October 6`n • Hours of operation will be from 9 am to 9 pm on weekdays and 9 am to midnight on the weekends (hours will vary depending on ticket sales). • Tickets will only be sold on line and cannot be purchased at the site. • Tours will be in 10 -minute increments and each tour would have 25-30 guests. • Anticipate a total of 1500 to 2000 guest a day on the peak days. • Intended to have internal circulation to check in guest on the premises. • The museum will have 24/7 security. • Food and beverage will be sold at the conclusion of the tour. There will be a tent located near the kitchen for guests to sit and eat. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 4 of 18 • No alcoholic beverages will be sold or permitted on the property. • There will be merchandise for sale. • The recording studio will be used for special sessions. • There will be no events held outside Paisley Park Museum. • Concerts will continue in the performance hall. These events could be up to 1500 people and will be coordinated to ensure they don't conflict with the museum tours. • In the future, the round building may be developed into a boutique hotel. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The 2030 Land Use Plan has this property guided Office Industrial. The proposed zoning is consistent with this land use. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT Sec. 20-501. Intent. "Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfer of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other, more standard zoning districts. It will be the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate that the city s expectations are to be realized as evaluated against the following criteria. Planned unit developments are to encourage the following: Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, mature trees, creeks, wetlands, lakes and scenic views. Analvsis: The changes to exterior of the site include additional parking and more capacity for storm water. 2. More efficient and effective use of land, open space and public facilities through mixing of land uses and assembly and development of land in larger parcels. Analvsis: Not applicable to this proposal. 3. High quality design and design compatibility with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. Site planning, landscaping and building architecture should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 5 of 18 Analvsis: The building's architecture is unique. No changes to the exterior are planned. 4. Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city will be encouraged. Analvsis: Not applicable to this proposal. 5. Development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Analvsis: The subject site is guided Office Industrial. The development is consistent with the comprehensive plan for industrial use. 6. Parks and open space. The creation of public open space may be required by the city. Such park and open space shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Park Plan and overall trail plan. Analvsis: Not applicable to this proposal. 7. Provision of housing affordable to all income groups if appropriate with the PUD. Analvsis: Not applicable to this proposal. 8. Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and siting and the clustering of buildings and land uses. Analvsis: Not applicable to this proposal. 9. Use of traffic management and design techniques to reduce the potential for traffic conflicts. Improvements to area roads and intersections may be required as appropriate. Analysis, A detailed traffic and parking study was prepared by SRF. Based on this study, staff has provided a detailed analysis of the traffic level of service and parking scenarios. Implementation of these options shall reduce the potential for conflicts. SITE PLAN REVIEW City staff will administratively review improvements to the site including parking lot expansion and new perimeter fencing. Sec. 20-108 of the city code permits administrative review of changes to a site plan. If the changes are less than ten percent of its gross floor area, provided that there is no variance involved and also provided that the community development director has conducted an administrative review pursuant to site plans standards. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 6 of 18 The intention of the operator is to install a new perimeter fence. The fence may be opaque and will limit visibility of the building. In addition, it will discourage things from being attached on the fence. The fence will be required to follow the city fencing ordinances. A tent is proposed in the northwest side of the building. Per the building code, a tent is a temporary structure and shall not be erected for more than 120 days in a 12 -month period. This tent must comply with building and fire code requirements. Sales, including merchandise, food and non-alcoholic beverages shall be limited and comply with the city code that states "Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for retail sales." ENGINEERING COMMENTS Grading The submittal did not contain a grading plan. Prior to any site disturbance a grading plan must be submitted for review and approval. Utilities The site is currently served by municipal sanitary sewer and water; upgrades to these facilities are not required at this time. The applicant shall submit the proposal to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services division (MCES) for a new Sanitary Access Charge (SAC) unit determination. If the MCES determines that the conversion to a museum results in additional SAC units, City SAC and Water Access Charges (WAC) and the MCES SAC charges must be paid. Future surface improvements such as driveway and parking lot expansion will require storm system improvements such as storm sewer installation and best management practices as required by the city and the watershed district. Traffic The property is located in the southeast comer of Trunk Highway 5 and Audubon Road. Highway 5 is classified as an arterial roadway and is under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT). Approval of the PUD and Site Plan are subject to MNDOT's conditions. Audubon Road, a two-lane major collector is identified as an "Important Transportation Facility" in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which states: This route connects TH 5, a major arterial, to Lyman Boulevard, another major arterial road. This route, in conjunction with Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road south Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 7of18 (CSAH 15), provides extended north -south transportation between communities. Audubon Road serves both residential and industrial development. A traffic study by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. was commissioned to evaluate the following: • Review existing operations of the study area, • Evaluate traffic impacts of the proposed development, • Evaluate the parking impacts of the proposed development, • Review the proposed access to the development, • Evaluate the site circulation and overall site operations, and • Recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development. A copy of the study is attached to this report. The traffic study estimates that the site will generate 4,000 trips per day based on the proposed tour size and schedule (65 guest/tour with a tour beginning every 10 minutes). The study estimates approximately 312 peak hour trips, meaning during the busiest hour on the adjacent routes, the proposed development would see 156 trips into the site and 156 trips out of the site. The existing and projected 2016 average daily traffic (ADT) volume is shown on Figure 1. As noted in Figure 1 the traffic on Audubon Road is estimated to be 7,800 ADT. As a comparison the 2015 ADT was 7,500 on West 78h Street between Great Plains Boulevard and Highway 101, a two-lane major collector roadway. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 8 of 18 Tours will operate from 9 am to 9 pm every day except for Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. The traffic study analyzed two peak trip generation scenarios: the PM weekday peak (4:30 pm to 5:30 pm) and the Saturday midday peak (11:45 am to 12:45 pm). The AM weekday peak was not analyzed as it does not correspond to the operating hours of Paisley Park. Supplemental traffic counts were taken on Audubon Road during the Saturday, September 3, 2016 Auto Motorplex event as the facility hosts a monthly event on a Saturday morning between 8 and 11. The Saturday event conditions were not reviewed as there would be limited impact on the system. The study observed the existing and projected the proposed traffic operations of the intersection of Audubon Road at Highway 5, Coulter Boulevard and Park Place. The existing and projected Level of Service (LOS, an indication of the quality of traffic flow) through each intersection was identified. The LOS designations range from A to F, with "A" representing an average delay less than 10 seconds/vehicle and "F" representing a delay greater than 50 seconds/vehicle (unsignalized intersection) or 80 seconds/vehicle (signalized intersection). The graphics below show the existing and anticipated traffic volumes and levels of service at the Audubon Road intersections at Highway 5 and the northern access; information on the McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard and Park Road intersections can be found in the traffic study. The analysis assumed no improvements to the roadway system, guests would access Paisley Park from the northern access, and employees of Paisley Park would use the southern access. of Fot ecasted: a- For J 2. Existing and forecasted conditions at Highway 5 (weekday PM peak volume/Saturday midday peak volume) Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 9of18 Figure 3. Forecasted conditions at the northern access to Paisley Park (weekday PM peak volume/Saturday midday peak volume) The study results identifv the the nofftrn access kill queue iii to Highway during the eekday PM - c,c under the forecasted conditions: I . 4 traffic qucucs cxr-end bei lTtd- the-not-tlieniaccess to Paisley - Figure 4. Forecasted queuing assuming no improvements to the system. These queues would be a safety concern and would reduce the level of service at the Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection. Altering the timing of signal at the intersection would not remedy Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 10 of 18 the situation due to the proximity of the northern access to Highway 5. This access lies 100 feet south of Highway 5; per Figure 7-12 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan the access should be a minimum of 220 feet south of Highway 5. The study presents two options to address the queuing: Figure 5. Option 1: Relocate the northern entrance a minimum of 100' south of the current location Figure 6. Option 2: Utilize the southern entrance as the main access to the site; close or limit the northern entrance to a partial access Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 11 of 18 The study indicates that Option 2 would result in the best traffic operations. Table 1 summarizes the current and projected levels of service of the affected intersections assuming: • Implementation of Option 2, Traffic signal timing optimization at the Highway 5 intersection, and Restriping Audubon Road to include a left turn lanes to the southern access and McGlynn Road. Staff prefers a hybrid of Option 1 and Option 2: shift the northern access such that it is 220' south of Highway 5, limit the northern entrance to a right -out of the site, utilize the southern entrance as the full access to Paisley Park, and restripe Audubon Road to include a left tum lane into the southern entrance and McGlynn Road. Staff will work with MNDOT with regards to the signal timing at Highway 5 and Audubon Road. Comment from MNDOT has not been received at this time, therefore any approvals shall be subject to MNDOT's conditions. Parking Analysis and Site Plan The SRF study included a site plan with proposed parking as shown in Figures 5 and 6 of this report. The site currently has 165 parking spaces: 105 spaces within the northern parking lot (currently only accessible by the northern access) 42 spaces within the southern parking lot (currently only accessible by the southern access) 18 spaces within an underground parking garage Based on the Paisley Park proposal for 65 guests per tour, tours departing every 10 minutes, and limiting the time guests stay SRF determined that 230 spaces are required to accommodate on- site parking for all guests. Due to the timing of Paisley Park's application and the impending end Highway 5 and Paisley Park North Access and Audubon Road Intersection Audubon Road Intersection Weekday PM Saturday Midday Weekday PM Saturday Midday Existing Level of Service Level of Service Condition B B n/a n/a 17 second delay 12 second dela Proposed, Level of Service Level of Service Level of Service Level of Service current system D B A/B A/B 46 second delay 17 second delay 13 second delay 13 second dela Proposed, Level of Service Level of Service system C B n/a n/a changes im lemented 22 second delay 17 second delay Staff prefers a hybrid of Option 1 and Option 2: shift the northern access such that it is 220' south of Highway 5, limit the northern entrance to a right -out of the site, utilize the southern entrance as the full access to Paisley Park, and restripe Audubon Road to include a left tum lane into the southern entrance and McGlynn Road. Staff will work with MNDOT with regards to the signal timing at Highway 5 and Audubon Road. Comment from MNDOT has not been received at this time, therefore any approvals shall be subject to MNDOT's conditions. Parking Analysis and Site Plan The SRF study included a site plan with proposed parking as shown in Figures 5 and 6 of this report. The site currently has 165 parking spaces: 105 spaces within the northern parking lot (currently only accessible by the northern access) 42 spaces within the southern parking lot (currently only accessible by the southern access) 18 spaces within an underground parking garage Based on the Paisley Park proposal for 65 guests per tour, tours departing every 10 minutes, and limiting the time guests stay SRF determined that 230 spaces are required to accommodate on- site parking for all guests. Due to the timing of Paisley Park's application and the impending end Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 12 of 18 to the 2016 construction season construction of the parking expansion this year is not feasible. The following scenarios summarize the options available to operate tours of Paisley Park: SCENARIO 1: Shuttle bus only for guests • This option would allow Paisley Park to operate tours with no improvements required to the Highway 5 signal system or Audubon Road. • Minor site improvements would likely be necessary to accommodate the turning movements of the busses. • The tour size would be limited by the maximum occupancy per the Fire Code. SCENARIO 2: On-site guest parking allowed, no site improvements • Audubon Road would be striped to include a left turn lane. • The number of on-site parking spaces for guests who arrive by a personal vehicle is limited to 105 spaces. SCENARIO 3: On-site guest narking allowed, connect the north and south lots • A paved aisle would connect the north and south parking areas. • Audubon Road would be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access. • All appropriate permits- for example with Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District- must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. • Sidewalks installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance. • The north access would be limited to a right -out of the site. • The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study. • The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. SCENARIO 4: On-site guest parking allowed, connect the north and south lots, expand Parking • The northern access would be converted to right -out only. • The northern and southern parking spaces would be connected. • The parking lot would be expanded to include 230 spaces. • Sidewalks installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance. • Audubon Road would be restriped for left tum lanes for north- and south -bound traffic at McGlynn Road. • The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study. • The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 13 of 18 There are many variables and discussion points associated with the parking and site plan that are best explained by stating the assumptions of the Paisley Park Business Plan and the SRF traffic study, concerns, options to address the concerns and the limiting factors of the options. Assumption Concern Potential Result Options Limiting Factors Guests arrive no earlier than Guests will not 30 minutes adhere to the prior to tour requirement Tickets state it is a self -guided tour; some Offsite The maximum patrons may take parking and shuttle to impervious Length of the o longer than 70 the site surface tour minutes Additional parking allowed for the minutes that was not Include site is 70%, Facility adds accounted for in the which limits more rooms to study conditions the amount of the tour, in the PUD surface increasing the approval parking on the len of the tour requiring ongoing site. Guests will stay Guests must longer to enjoy monitoring leave within 45 the food, of and minutes of the shopping and performance end of the tour ambiance of standards Paisley Park for parking Pedestrian traffic to Guests will Some guests park the site. Currently park on-site off-site and walk there is no trail or to the site sidewalk to Paisley Park The parking will be monitored to determine the adequacy of the on-site parking. If at any time the Community Development Director or Fire Code deems that the on-site parking is inadequate the PUD shall be amended to decrease the maximum allowable tour size to a level where the on- site parking is sufficient, or the property owner must amend the PUD and the site plan to provide more parking. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the city and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. The applicant must submit a $20,000 escrow or letter of credit as a financial security to ensure the installation of the required improvements. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 14 of 18 The applicant shall submit engineered site plan drawings for review and approval. The site plan drawings must meet or exceed the requirements set forth in the Chanhassen City Code and the Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The site plan shall also meet or exceed the requirements of agencies that have jurisdiction over the site, such as MNDOT and Riley - Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District. Recommendation The Engineering Department recommended conditions for approval of the Paisley Park PUD and site plan are as follows: 1. Prior to any site disturbance a grading plan must be submitted for review and approval. 2. If the MCES determines that the conversion to a museum results in additional SAC units, City SAC and Water Access Charges (WAC) and the MCES SAC charges must be paid. 3. Future surface improvements such as driveway and parking lot expansion will require storm system improvements such as storm sewer installation and best management practices as required by the city and the watershed district. 4. If guests arrive to the site by a shuttle bus only, then tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy per the Fire Code. 5. If guests utilize the parking that is on-site as of September 15, 2016 (ie. no site improvements are installed): a. Audubon Road would be striped to include a left tum lane, and b. The number of on-site parking spaces for guests who arrive by a personal vehicle is limited to 105 spaces. 6. If guests utilize the parking that is on-site as of September 15, 2016 and pave a connection between the north and south lots: a. All appropriate permits- for example with Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District- must be obtained prior to installing the pavement, b. Sidewalks must be installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance, c. The north access shall be limited to a right -out of the site, d. By 8 am local time, October 5, 2016, Audubon Road must be striped to include a left tum lane into the southern access, e. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study, and f. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. 7. If guests park on-site and site improvements include expanding the parking area to 230 spaces and connecting the north and south parking lots a. The northern access shall be right -out only, Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 15 of 18 b. Sidewalks must be installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance, c. By 8 am local time, October 5, 2016, Audubon Road shall be restriped for left turn lanes for north- and south -bound traffic at McGlynn Road, d. By 8 am local time, October 5, 2016, the traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road would be optimized based on the SRF study, and e. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle. 8. If at any time the Community Development Director or Fire Code deems that the on-site parking is inadequate the PUD shall be amended to decrease the maximum allowable tour size to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the property owner must amend the PUD and the site plan to provide more parking. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the city and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. 9. The applicant must submit a $20,000 escrow or letter of credit as a financial security to ensure the installation of the required improvements. 10. The applicant shall submit engineered site plan drawings for review and approval. The site plan drawings must meet or exceed the requirements set forth in the Chanhassen City Code and the Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The site plan shall also meet or exceed the requirements of agencies that have jurisdiction over the site, such as MNDOT and Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District. Stormwater When a full site plan is submitted it will be review the proposed alterations and comment accordingly. The site plan must comply with Article VII of Chapter 19. In addition, the site will be governed by the requirements of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. Landscaping Landscape Requirements Minimum requirements for landscaping include 1,140 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot expansion, 4 trees and 2 landscape islands or peninsulas for the expanded parking area. Applicant's proposed landscaping as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 16 of 18 Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 1,140 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Trees/ parking lot 4 overstory 0 overstory 2 islands or peninsulas 0 islands/peninsulas The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for landscaping. Recommendations: 1. The applicant shall submit a parking lot landscape plan for approval that meets minimum ordinance requirements. 2. The applicant shall increase landscaping in existing parking area to meet minimum ordinance requirements: 2,280 sq. ft. of landscape area, 9 trees and 4 islands or peninsulas. Building review The proposed future uses of the existing structure(s), as outlined in the provided documents, would necessitate a change in Occupancy Classification under the Minnesota State Building Code. (The "Paisley Park" building has a Certificate of Occupancy for "B", "S-1" occupancies only. The "exterior round building" was never completed and has no Certificate.) The existing building must be compliant (or be made compliant) with the requirements of the Occupancy Classification of these proposed uses: Museum (A-3 Occupancy), Food and Drink (A-2 Occupancy), Retail sales (M Occupancy), Recording studio (B Occupancy), Concert usage (A-1 Occupancy) and Storage (S-1 Occupancy). (Rei 2015 MSBC, Chapter 3) 1. Permits must be obtained for the alteration of or occupancy use changes to any buildings on the site. (Ref. MN Rule 1300.0120) 2. Supporting documents (plans, specifications, etc.) must be prepared by and signed by the appropriate design professionals. (Ref. MN Rule 1300.0130) 3. Existing structure's physical plant (plumbing, HVAC, electrical, fire suppression, fire -rated separations, etc.) must be evaluated and approved as functioning as required by the various proposed Occupancies. 4. A new Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained before use or occupancy. (Ref. MN Rule 1300.0220) 5. A "Sewer Access Charge" redetermination is required (Metropolitan Council). 6. The "studio building" project was stopped (by the owner) sometime in 2002 and the permit subsequently expired. The building is incomplete and has no Certificate of Occupancy, therefore, cannot be used for any purpose. A new building permit must be applied for (including all related documentation) and approved for construction to re- commence. A letter advising of the expiration of the permit was sent to the contractor (Rutledge Const.) and to Fred Evans (Paisley Park Enterprises) in February of 2003. Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 17 of 18 7. Accessible parking is required; the number of required accessible parking spaces is determined by the Minnesota State Accessibility Code, Table 1106.1 (based on the total number of provided spaces, parking plan required). Fire Review Some consideration needs to be given to an alterative use of a concert hall which I will cover later in this document. Parking Plan Regardless of approved use, a minimum of a 20' access to areas of any part of the building must be maintained to allow emergency vehicle access and egress during hours of operation. I am not concerned about out lots at this point. A proposed site plan, to include actual parking areas, should be provided so the Fire Code can indicate fire lanes etc. Building Use In the planned use they loosely imply that the use could be as a concert hall. Historically, these concerts have been scheduled with no notice and no access. The major issue relates to the open configuration of the main sound stage. The configuration has changed dramatically and involves temporary seating. Consideration should be given to; Either require a special event permit for any event that would involve the concert use of this property to ensure appropriate stage and seating configurations, parking, are reviewed and approved by the building official, fire department, and planning department. Or; Create a fixed seating and stage arrangement utilizing an appropriate architect negating the need for permit requirements unless a deviation from the approved plans is necessary. Approved occupancy would be based on the arrangement and approved by the building official. Fire Inspections The last on-site fire inspection was conducted in 2015. I have been working with Bremer Bank representatives to correct several open violations from that inspection. It should be noted that none of the open violations are of a serious nature. The most serious relates to off hours' access to the building which is currently being worked on with an outside contractor. Prior to opening, and pending planning approval, the building will need a complete fire inspection based on the new building classification. That inspection can be conducted as soon as possible and should not dramatically change any requirements already existing for the current building classification as a B Occupancy. This inspection will also identify any work done to remedy open violations from the 2015 inspection. Storage Area Within the planned use, the document refers to a storage area. I am confused if this is indoors or outdoors. The document eludes that vehicles, including a bus, may be stored for display. I am Paisley Park Museum September 20, 2016 Page 18 of 18 also to understand that the viewing areas are all on the main level leading me to believe that this does not include the parking garage specifically designed for parking vehicles. If the plan is to park vehicles indoors for viewing, a fire protection engineer should review and approve the site plan ensuring the current suppression system can cover the fire load increase created by the vehicles. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motions: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11 Block 1 Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from IOP to PUD and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance and Finding of Fact. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact 2. PUD Ordinance 3. Development Review Application 4. Business Plan 5. Chanhassen City Code, Chapter 20 — Article XXII. - "IOP" Industrial Office Park District 6. Traffic Study SRF dated September 12, 2016 7. Affidavit of Mailing Notice of Public Hearing. 8. Emails from residents: a. Email from Jennifer Singer b. Email from Kristi Strang c. Email from Lynne Etling d. Email from Susan Davis e. Email from John Sparrow f. Email from Stephanie Friant g. Email and memo from Wendy OConnor h. Email from Nancy Pexa i. Email and memo from Melanie Mertes j. Email from Brian Haak gAplan\2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museum\pc Staff repM.doc . ENGINEERS nim , PLANNERS DESIGNERS Con.ull ln� Group, Inc. To: Paul Oehme, PE Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Chanhassen From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Tom Sachi, EIT, Engineer Date: September 12, 2016 Subject: 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Introduction Draft Memorandum SRFNo. 0169371 SRF has completed a traffic and parking study for the proposed Paislev Park Museum at 7801 Audubon Road in the City of Chanhassen (see Figure 1: Project Location). The main objectives of this study are to review existing operations within the study area, evaluate traffic and parking impacts of the proposed development, and recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development. A review of the proposed access, circulation, and overall site operations was also completed. The following infonnation provides the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations offered for consideration. Existing Conditions The existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline in order to identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes intersection turning movement counts, field observations, and an intersection capacity analysis. Data Collection Intersection turning movement counts were collected at the following locations between Thursday, August 25 and Sunday, August 28, 2016. • Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 • Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard • Audubon Road and Park Road These periods were selected as they include the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, as well as the Saturday midday peak period. Supplemental traffic counts were collected along Audubon Road on Saturday, September 3, 2016 to understand impacts associated with the adjacent AutoMotorPlex facility, which holds a Saturday event between 8 a.m. and 11 a.m. once a month. Annual average daily traffic (ADT) volumes within the study area, as well as historical MN Highway 5 turning movement counts from 2013 were provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 1 MINNEAPOLis, biN 55447 1 763.475.0010 1 W W W.SRFC.ONSULTWG.COM Coulter Boulevard - 0 w 0 a z Q Id Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen September 12, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Panting Study A summary of the traffic volumes collected are illustrated in Chart 1. Review of the data collected indicates that traffic volumes along MN Highway 5 generally peak during the weekday a.m. (7:45 to 8:45) and p.m. (4:30 to 5:30) time periods. Traffic volumes along Audubon Road also generally peak during the same time periods, albeit at much lower levels. On Saturday, traffic volumes along MN Highway 5 peak during the midday (11:45 to 12:45), while volumes along Audubon Road remain relatively steady throughout the day. It should be noted that there is a noticeable traffic volume peak along Audubon Road that coincides with a Saturday AutoMotorPlex event Chart 1 Existing Traffic Volume Profiles 800 700 0 •rr = � I v 300 v `0 u v 200 z 100 + Weekday: Highway 5 t Weekday: Audubon Road 6 Saturday: Highway 5 —0-- Satuday: Audubon Road ••••7!i••• Saturday (Car Show): Audubon Road e cP 0 0 Time of Day Observations were completed to identify roadway characteristics (ie. roadway geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls) within the study area. MN Highway 5 is a four -lane divided roadway with left- and right -tum lanes at Audubon Road. The posted speed limit along MN Highway 5 is 55 miles per hour (mph). Audubon Road, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road are two-lane undivided roadways. The posted speed limit along Audubon Road is 45 mph while the remaining study roadways are posted at 30 mph. The Audubon Road/MN Highway 5 intersection is signalized. All other study intersections are unsignalized with side -street stop control Mcglynn Road and the existing Paisley Park access locations were not reviewed as part of the existing conditions due to limited activity. Existing study area geometrics, traffic controls, and traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Page 3 L1;, S Existing Conditions Figure 2 gym. r;nR G.oup, W. 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study 00169371 City of Chanhassen September 2016 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Intersection Capacity Analysis September 12, 2016 An existing intersection capacity analysis was completed for the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations can be compared. The weekday a.m. peak hoot was not reviewed since the proposed development is expected to have minimal impact during that time. Saturday event conditions at the AutoMotorPlex were not reviewed given the limited impact. Intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic (Version 9). Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS), which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 1. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles experiencing minimal delays. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. Overall intersection LOS A through LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities. Table 1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections LOS Designation Signalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) A < 10 <_ 10 8 >10-20 >10-15 C >20-35 >15-25 0 > 35 - 55 > 25 - 35 E >55-80 >35-50 F > 80 > 50 For side -street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side -street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignahzed intersection with side -street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side -street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high levels of delay (ie. poor levels of service) on the side -street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 2 indicate that the study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the existing geometric layout and traffic controls. Side -street delays along Audubon Road are relatively minimal However, northbound queues along Audubon Road extend beyond the existing Paisley Park North Access approximately 50 percent of the weekday p.m. peak hour (--185 feet). The 95th percentile westbound left -turning queues along MN Highway 5 during the weekday p.m. peak hour extend approximately 160 feet Page 5 Paul Clehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis September 12, 2016 Weekday P.M. Saturday Midday Intersection Peak Hour Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 B 17 sec. B 12 sec. Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard() A/B 12 sec. A/B 10 sec. Audubon Road and Park Road (1) A/B 11 sec. A/A 9 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Proposed Development The proposed development is expected to convert Paisley Park Studios into a Museum. Opening is currently planned for October 2016. Based on discussion with project stakeholders, the following information with respect to the Museum operation was assumed: • Hours of Operation: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. • Days of Operation: Everyday (except Thanksgiving and Christmas) • Maximum Guests per Tour: 65 people (50 General Admission; 15 VII') • Tour Start Times: Every 10 minutes • Tour Duration: General Admission - 70 minutes; VIP - 100 minutes • Employees: Up to 60 but no more than 20 on-site at any given time (except special events) • Existing Parking Spaces: ^- 165 spaces (105 North; 42 South; 18 Garage) The two existing Paisley Park access locations along Audubon Road are expected to remain. The Paisley Park South Access, located across from Mcglynn Road and approximately 500 south of MN Highway 5, would serve as the employee entrance. The Paisley Park North Access, located approximately 125 feet south of MN Highway 5, would serve as the guest entrance. The guest entrance would be staffed at all times to manage/control access to the site. Existing + Museum Conditions To identify potential impacts associated with the proposed museum, traffic forecasts were developed for year of opening conditions. Since the museum is planning to open in October 2016, existing conditions with the addition of the proposed museum were reviewed. Therefore, the following sections provide details on the estimated trip generation and intersection capacity analysis. Trip Generation To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, a trip generation estimate for the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours as well as on a weekday daily basis was developed. Given the unique land use, data provided by project staff was utilized. For purposes of this study, a worst-case approach was assumed in which full capacity tours (65 guests) at the museum would occur starting every 10 minutes throughout the peak periods of the adjacent roadway. Page 6 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen September 12, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study The average vehicle occupancy was assumed to be 2.5 guests per vehicle. All employees were assumed to arrive and/or depart outside of the peak tour timeframes. No shuttle service/transit reductions were included as part of the analysis, although it is reasonable to assume approximately 10 to 15 percent of guests may arrive via transit. Results of the trip generation estimate indicates the proposed development is expected to generate up to approximately 312 peak hour trips during a sold out condition. If each tour was sold out for the entire day, the site could generate up to 4,000 daily trips. Although it may be not be likely that tours are completely sold out throughout the day, it is reasonable to assume that tours may be sold out during the peak periods. Therefore, the analysis focused on the peak hours of the adjacent roadways assuming sold out tour conditions during the peak periods. Table 3 Trip Generation Estimate Weekday P.M. Saturday Midday Sold Out Event Condition Size Peak Hour Trips Peak Hour Trips Dally Trips in Out I In Out cis uuests per Paisley Park Museum (1) 10 -Minute Tour Start 156 156 156 156 4.000(2) (2.5 Guests/Vehicle) (1) Based on data provided by project staff. (2) Represents the maximum amount of trips expected to be generated (assumes sold-0ut tours throughout the day). Trips generated by the proposed development were routed throughout the study area based on the directional distribution shown in Figure 3. The distribution was developed based on a combination of data provided by project staff, existing travel patterns, and engineering judgment. The resultant year 2016 build peak hour conditions, including sold -out conditions, are shown in Figure 4. Year 2016 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine if the existing roadway network can accommodate the year 2016 build conditions, a detailed intersection capacity analysis was completed. Results of the year 2016 intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 4 indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the existing geometric layout and traffic controls. However, as westbound left -turn vehicles from MN Highway 5 access Audubon Road and eventually the Paisley Park North Access, the lack of a left -turn lane along southbound Audubon Road results in queues extending to MN Highway 5 during the weekday p.m. peak hour. These types of queues create a safety issue, as well as a reduction in the overall efficiency of the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection operations. Signal timing improvements alone would not address the operational and queuing issues associated with the proximity of the Paisley Park North Access. Therefore, relocating the Paisley Park North Access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location should be considered (Option 1). However, the best operations would occur if the Paisley Park South Access was the primary entrance/exit and the Paisley Park North Access was closed or converted to partial access (Option 2). Page 7 1 Or -ToI T Cou ter Bou evarj � 3 � r K/ Y S pal 4 row W ON I Year 2016 Build Conditions Figure 4 can.mreR Group, Inc. 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study 00169371 City of Chanhassen September 2016 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Table 4 Year 2016 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis September 12, 2016 Intersection Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 D 46 sec. B 17 sec. Audubon Road and Paisley Park North Access Irl A/B 13 sec. A/B 12 sec. Audubon Road and Paisley Park South Access irl A/B 12 sec. A/B 11 sec. Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard (3) A/B 13 sec. A/B 10 sec. Audubon Road and Park Road Ill A/B 11 sec. A/B 11 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with sidestreet stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. To determine how the study intersection would be expected to operate if the Paisley Park North Access were closed (Option 2), another year 2016 build intersection capacity analysis was completed. This analysis assumed the traffic signal timing at the Audubon Road/MN Highway 5 intersection would be optimized, as well as restriping the segment of Audubon Road south of MN Highway 5 to include dedicated left -turn lanes at the Paisley Park South Access. Results of the year 2016 intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 5 indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the Paisley Park North Access closure, restriping along Audubon Road, and optimized signal timing. All queuing will be maintained within the existing turn lanes. Table 5 Year 2016 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis (Paisley Park North Access Closed) Intersection Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour i7wSIT Delay LOS Delay Audubon Road and MN Highway 5 C 22 sec. B 17 sec. Audubon Road and Paisley Park North Access (1) — — — — Audubon Road and Paisley Park South Access Ili A/B 13 sec. A/B 11 sec. Audubon Road and Coulter Boulevard Irl A/B 12 sec. A/B 10 sec. Audubon Road and Park Road Irl A/B 11 sec. A/B 10 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify the Paisley Park North Access to ensure safe and efficient operations within the area. Therefore alternative access to the site, particularly off-site shuttle service for guests, should be considered until access to the site can be modified accordingly. Further discussion regarding access and site improvements is provided later in this document Page 10 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Parking Review September 12, 2016 Based on a review of the current site layout, it is estimated that there is a total of approximately 165 parking spaces on site. Of these spaces, approximately 105 are located in the north parking lot, 42 are located in the south parking lot, and the remaining 18 spaces are in the underground garage. With the assumptions used as part of the trip generation estimates (i.e. 65 guests per 10 -minute tour, 2.5 guests per vehicle, 70 -minute tour length, and 20 staff on site), the peak on-site parking demand is estimated to be approximately 230 spaces. This accounts for guests arriving/departing at least 10 minutes befote/after their respective tours. With the estimated peak parking demand (230 spaces) and the existing parking supply (165 spaces), there is expected to be a 65 space parking deficit. Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify/add parking. Therefore alternative access to the site (i.e. shuttle service) or a reduction in overall tour guests (i.e. a maximum of 45 guests per tour) should be considered until adequate parking can be provided. Other Considerations In addition to the traffic and parking issues identified, the following other items are offered for consideration. An illustration of the potential access and parking modification options are shown in Figures 5 and 6. 1) Given the traffic, access, and parking challenges identified as well as the expected opening in October 2016, shuttle operations should be incorporated until adequate access and parking is provided. Potential shuttle routing is provided in Figure 7. 2) Provide adequate on-site staffing and vehicle storage to ensure queues from entering guests do not extend into Audubon Road. If adequate storage is not provided, a traffic control officer may be needed at the Audubon Road/Main Entrance. Furthermore, the addition of a northbound right -turn lane should be considered to reduce the potential for queuing issues on Audubon Road. 3) Consider the addition of pedestrian facilities (i.e. a sidewalk or trail), particularly along the east side of the site to reduce potential conflicts. Page 11 teconfiguration (Option 1) Figure 5 in Road Traffic and Parking Study ssen 2econfiguration (Option 2) Figure 6 in Road Traffic and Parking Study ssen Paul Oehme, City of Chanbassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Summary and Conclusions September 12, 2016 The following study conclusions and recommendations are offered for consideration: 1) The study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Side -street delays along Audubon Road are relatively minimal. Northbound queues along Audubon Road extend beyond the existing Paisley Park North Access approximately 50 percent of the weekday p.m. peak hour (— 185 feet). 2) The proposed development is expected to generate up to approximately 312 peak hour trips during a sold out condition. If each tour was sold out for the entire day, the site could generate up to 4,000 daily trips. 3) Results of the year 2016 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that the study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. However, as westbound left -turn vehicles from MN Highway 5 access Audubon Road and eventually the Paisley Park North Access, the lack of a left -turn lane along southbound Audubon Road results in queues extending to MN Highway 5 during the weekday p.m. peak hour. These types of queues create a safety issue, as well as a reduction in the overall efficiency of the MN Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection operations. 4) Signal timing improvements alone would not address the operational and queuing issues associated with the proximity of the Paisley Park North Access. Therefore, relocating the Paisley Park North Access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location should be considered (Option 1). However, the best operations would occur if the Paisley Park South Access was the primary entrance/exit and the Paisley Park North Access was closed or converted to partial access (Option 2). 5) The study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or better during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours with the Paisley Park North Access closure (Option 2), restriping along Audubon Road, and optimized signal timing. All queuing will be maintained within the existing turn lanes. 6) Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify the Paisley Park North Access to ensure safe and efficient operations within the area. Therefore alternative access to the site, particularly off-site shuttle service for guests, should be considered until access to the site can be modified accordingly. 7) The current site layout can accommodate a total of approximately 165 parking spaces on site (105 north lot, 42 south lot, 18 garage). The peak on-site parking demand is estimated to be approximately 230 spaces, which results in a 65 space parking deficit. a. Given the anticipated museum opening in early October 2016, there may not be sufficient time to relocate/modify parking. Therefore alternative access to the site (i.e. shuttle service) or a reduction in overall tour guests (i.e. a maximum of 45 guests per tour) should be considered until adequate parking can be provided. Page 15 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen September 12, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study 8) Other considerations indude: a. Development of a shuttle routing plan. b. Provide adequate on-site staffing and vehicle storage to ensure queues from entering guests do not extend into Audubon Road. If adequate storage is not provided, a traffic control officer may be needed at the Audubon Road/Main Entrance and/or the addition of a northbound right -turn lane should be considered. c. Consider the addition of pedestrian facilities (i.e. a sidewalk or trail), particularly along the east side of the site to reduce potential conflicts. H:\P,j,*\09007\9371 \TS\R"t\9371_Dmft 7801Awdnb,,R.,t Troffu_Prm.F1n854rdy_1G0912dax Page 16 Aanenson, Kate From: Jorgensen Family <jorgensen.family@outlook.com> Sent: Wednesday, October OS, 2016 2:46 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Paisley Park - Please do not approve as museum Good afternoon, I was told to send you an email regarding input about the proposed Paisley Park re -zoning. Please do not allow this to go through. My family and I live off of Stone Creek Drive and my children are in the Bluff Creek Elementary district; all of which would be greatly impacted (and already have been) by this proposal. We love our city, but I cannot handle the thought of 2,000+ strangers a day, every day/all-day long, coming into our area of Chanhassen. Living off of Audubon is already difficult with the semi -trucks coming in and out of General Mills and the masses of people who attend the Saturday morning events at the Autoplex. From a community standpoint, the concept of turning Paisley Park into a Graceland-type place is just disheartening. I do not see any positive benefit of this addition to our community. This entire concept of this museum is simply driven by the greed of those attempting to capitalize on the legacy of Prince. It frustrates me that people who are not members of our community could negatively impact our home lives, our neighborhoods, just for a profit. They were so arrogant to have just assumed the original vote would have gone through, that they pre -sold those tickets and now we have to deal with another flood of strangers a few times this month. There is a day-care across the street, I can't imagine what those parents must feel about all of this. It is wrong to put this on the families who live here in Chanhassen, just so random people can get tours of a fairly empty building. I apologize if my concerns were not meant to go to you, but I just wish that the City Council would actually reach out to the residents in the area. I do not know a single neighbor of mine that wants this re -zoning to be approved; I think we are all concerned about this outcome. Please think of the community and our city, it is far more important than the legacy of a musician. Perhaps the building should be torn down and replaced by an actual park? That would be giving back to the quiet community that Prince seemed to have enjoyed. Thank you for listening, Brandt & Jessica Jorgensen 8108 Stone Creek Dr. / Chanhassen jorgensen.family@outlook.com Petersen, Chelsea From: Petersen, Chelsea Sent: Friday, October 7, 2016 10:10 AM To: City Council Cc: Gerhardt, Todd CTGerhardt@ci.chanhassen.mn.us) Subject: FW: PP tour Please see below. CP From: taufenburger, Denny Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:33 PM To: Petersen, Chelsea <CPetersen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: PP tour Forward to council, please. Denny Laufenburger Mayor - City of Chanhassen 612-327-6800 Wad Originated Begin forwarded message: From: MaryJohnson <marvanitajohnsonna,charter.net> Date: October 6, 2016 at 8:43:19 PM CDT To: <dlaufenburgerna ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: PP tour Dear Mayor, Do you think there could be anyway that we who had tickets the day of the concert, Oct 13, could still see the tour? People are coming from all over to go to the concert and tour. Please reconsider for this one day, since things went so well the first day. Please, please consider. Thank you, Mary Johnson Sent from my Wad Petersen, Chelsea From: Petersen, Chelsea Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 8:38 AM To: Campion, Dan; Ryan, Elise; Tjornhom, Bethany; Laufenburger, Denny; McDonald, Jerry Cc: Gerhardt, Todd Subject: Fwd: City Council meeting Please see below. CP Sent from my Whone Begin forwarded message: From: "Laufenburger, Denny"<DLaufenbureerAci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: October 6, 2016 at 4:56:43 AM CDT To: 'Petersen, Chelsea"<CPetersenna,ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: City Council meeting Please forward to Council DENNY LAUFENBURGER Mayor, City of Chanhassen 612-327-6800 (cell) From: Tami Procopio [tamidee07gatt.net] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 4:28 AM To: Laufenburger, Denny Subject: City Council meeting Dear Mr. Mayor. I understand the city council will meet again next week. I implore you to please ask them to issue at a minimum a temporary permit through December for Paisley Park. I believe with satellite parking and shuttle buses, there is no reason why the city would not be able to facilitate the tours for current ticket holders. Please work to ask them to be open minded to at least try. Those of us who have made non refundable travel arrangements cannot be at the meeting to have our voices heard. Please be our voice at the meeting next week. We only want to visit your city and Paisley Park. Our intentions are not to disturb the community in a negative manner. With all due respect, please be our voice and implore the city council to at least give us a chance. Thank you. Respectfully submitted, v Tami Procopio Wilmington, NC Petersen, Chelsea From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Please see below. CP Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: Petersen, Chelsea Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:33 PM Campion, Dan; Ryan, Elise, rjornhom, Bethany, Laufenburger, Denny; McDonald, Jerry Gerhardt, Todd Fwd: Paisley Park From: "Laufenburger, Denny" <DLaufenburgerAci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: October 5, 2016 at 9:36:01 PM CDT To: "Petersen, Chelsea" <CPetersenaa ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: Paisley Park Forward to city council DENNY LAUFENBURGER Mayor, City of Chanhassen 612-327-6800 (cell) From: Me jcahpsu( gmail.com) Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 9:35 PM To: Laufenburger, Denny Subject: Paisley Park Shame on you and this city council! My family and I have paid hundreds of dollars for airfare, hotel accommodations and tickets to tour Paisley Park near end of this month. I have been following all the news and information available online for months regarding planning, and the opening. Online discussions, blogs and commentary today highlight how almost everyone sees, very clearly, the failures of the Chanhassen local government. My money and time? I work very hard for both ... you and the council have a serious responsibility to get the "parking/traffic" concerns taken care of expeditiously, no excuses. No one is buying the shade thrown at the planners. Appears to all, a colossal failure of your local council. Sent from my iPad Petersen, Chelsea From: Petersen, Chelsea Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:33 PM To: Campion, Dan; Ryan, Elise; Tjornhom, Bethany; Laufenburger, Denny; McDonald, Jerry Cc: Gerhardt, Todd Subject. Fwd: Visit Please see below. CP Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Laufenburger, Denny" <DLaufenburger@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: October 5, 2016 at 9:12:18 PM CDT To: "Petersen, Chelsea" <CPetersenPci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: Visit Please forward to Council DENNY LAUFENBURGER Mayor, City of Chanhassen 612-327-6800 (cell) From: Robert Parker frparker(abcleanearthinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 1:40 PM To: Laufenburger, Denny Subject: Visit Mayor Dlaufenburger, I know this is petty with all the city issues you have to deal with but I have something I would like to address. We found outlast night that your city council issued a temporary permit for Paisley Park to open though the 14"'. My issue is we have purchased tickets for the 22"" and now it appears it is in jeopardy of it being open. We live just south of Paducah, KY and I have purchased airline tickets for my wife and myself to visit you great city 10/21-10/23 and the airline tickets are non-refundable. We have been married for 29 years, we have never got to take a trip alone for our anniversary due to chasing our kids around for every school sporting event possible during this time (with no regrets). I decided to do something special for her as she was the #1 Prince fan back in the day! Finally, we had the opportunity to get away so what do we do? Do you feel something will be worked out so we can continue with our plans or should I try to schedule a flight somewhere else. Again, I know this is no big deal to you but its very big for her. Thoughts? Thank you for your time and have a great day. Robert Parker Facility Manager A Clean Earth Company 1689 Shar-Cal Road, Calvert City, KY 42029 T 270.395.0504 X 228 1 C 270.703.5077 1 F 270.395.0516 Roarker(o)cleanearthinc com I vrrrw.cleanearthinc.com Please consider the environment before printing this email. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be confidential and are the property of Clean Earth. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please notify the sender as soon as possible and delete the email. Thank you (any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, or printing of this email is not ethical and should be prohibited) Petersen, Chelsea From: Petersen, Chelsea Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:32 PM To: Campion, Dan; Ryan, Elise; Tjornhom, Bethany; Laufenburger, Denny; McDonald, Jerry Cc: Gerhardt, Todd Subject: Fwd: Oregon to Paisley Park Tour Please see below. CP Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Laufenburger, Denny" <DLaufenburger(a ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: October 5. 2016 at 9:09:57 PM CDT To: "Petersen, Chelsea"<CPetersen(i�ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: Oregon to Paisley Park Tour Please forward to council DENNY LAUFENBURGER Mayor, City of Chanhassen 612-327-6800 (cell) From: ktkpatton(alcomcast net [ktkpatton(a)comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 5:29 PM To: Laufenburger, Denny Subject: Oregon to Paisley Park Tour Hi Denny First let me say that I appreciate all that you and the city has done for Paisley Park / Prince fans to date. I don't think that anyone argues that Prince deserves a museum. I'd like to shed some light on my personal journey here so maybe the city council of Chanhassen has a different view. I am a single mom of two amazing kids in Beaverton Oregon. I have been a Prince fan forever and a day. Anyone who knows me knows this about me. My car has Prince playing daily, I Prince memorabilia in my office in my home etc. He has been a part of 1 my daily life for years. It's amazing the profound effect someone like that can have on a small nobody like me. The day he died my phone blew up with calls of friends and family checking to see if I was ok. My 12 year old daughter cried and all she could say was that means I'll never get to see him in concert. I said I know, it was a goal of ours. I've been lucky enough to see him 4 times, simply amazing, I wanted so badly for my kids to see him. My son turns 18 on the 21st of October. here was rumor that Paisley Park would maybe open as a museum. I watched carefully for any news on this. My kids and I went through a nasty divorce about 8 years ago. We have had more life in our time then I believe anyone should have. I have worked very hard to keep their world stable and balanced without them having a clue of the things I juggled. Its been a long road. I have always played life safe, always stayed close to home. I heard that Paisley Park was going to open for tours. The day the tickets went on sale, even though I wasn't crazy about the terms as they came as a risk, I bought tickets, 3 VIP tickets. I decided that we were going on an adventure. We have never done anything like this before. Neither of my children have been on a plane, never left the state of Oregon. I started planning ... I bought our airfare and booked a hotel. As I did this in September, even then the availability of things was tight. I planned our trip around the rumor Tribute concert on the 13th. All booked, no refunds, all paid, waiting anxiously. Shortly after all this was in place, the other shoe of my messy divorce hit the floor. Discouraged of the timing of it all, the bank served papers to start the Foreclosure process on my house. I was sick, thinking of the money that I had spent on this trip. This of course is my dream trip, to be able to pay respects to someone so amazing. The frustrating part of the Foreclosure is that it has been looming over us for about 6 years, I spent 8 months with my attorney trying to get them to take possession, they wouldn't take it. Deep sigh. I decided the money was spent we were going to go and have a great time. Monday night I live streamed the council meeting, listened as everyone made their points. A lot of really good points, I too am a good neighbor in my community and understand the decisions that need to be made. I was also very frustrated by the argument that the city needs to decide if they want to be a "tourist" attraction. I must say that Chanhassen should be proud that Prince lived in his hometown, he was a good neighbor, and that Chanhassen became a "tourist" attraction when Purple Rain hit it big, Paisley Park has been a place that any and all Prince fans have dreamed of seeing, even if it was at the outside gate. Now like any good Prince fan, I scooped up tickets as soon as I could and made arrangements to make it happen. I was deeply saddened by the vote to table Paisley Park based on doing more traffic studies etc. From what I have read the applicants have done all the things they have been asked. The opening of Paisley Park was planned around the tribute concert, how very exciting, until it was tabled. My heart sunk as my tickets for tour were not until the 15th. An update from the city allowed 3 days of tours to proceed. I'm a controller for a corporation. I get planning and safety, risks etc. I also know that sometimes no matter how much planning goes into something you can't really know the affects it may have until you see it in motion. I was hoping the city of Chanhassen would have seen that the applicant seems to be more than willing to make this a good thing, you can all benefit from this being a good thing. I would of rather 2 seen a temporary approval of 30 days, I think this would give the city a good peek at what this would do and the impact it would have on the neighbors. It would cover the fans who have purchased travel tickets for the month. I know for myself it was very disappointing but worse when I had to explain to the kids. Our life has been a series of journeys, I have taught my kids to handle things with grace and that there is always a silver lining to even the worst situations. We are still making our journey. We are still planning to drive to Chanhassen, to at least see Paisley Park. I would imagine I'm not the only one in this situation. I would imagine the city will still see lots of folks with the same thought process. When I got my tour tickets they were very specific about how much time we could come early and exit time. It all seemed very organized and planned. I imagine the city would take this into account that it seemed more controlled than a random influx of fans making their own agenda. I look forward to visiting Chanhassen to explore what Prince loved so much about it to make it his home for all those years. I guess in a round about very long storied way, I'm asking for Chanhassen to agree to a temporary permit for a longer period of time so fans who have already paid money for travels could be accommodated as you know most people book flights much more in advance to get better rates. Best regards Kandice Patton 7 Petersen, Chelsea From: Petersen, Chelsea Sent Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:31 PM To: Campion, Dan; Ryan, Elise; TJornhom, Bethany, Laufenburger, Denny; McDonald, Jerry Cc: Gerhardt, Todd Subject: Fwd: Paisley Park tour dates Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Laufenburger, Denny"<DLaufenburgerna,ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: October 5, 2016 at 8:38:11 PM CDT To: "Petersen, Chelsea" <CPetersenna_ ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: Paisley Park tour dates Forward to Council DENNY LAUFENBURGER Mayor, City of Chanhassen 612-327-6800(cell) From: Jackie [jlazar(a),sasktel.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 6:56 PM To: Laufenburger, Denny Subject: Paisley Park tour dates Mayor Laufenburger, I am writing to ask you to reconsider the dates that you will allow Prince "friends" (he never liked us to call ourselves fans) to visit the home of our musical genius and allow us to pay our respects and close our grief over the loss of such a spectacular person. I know that we will not disappoint you or your fellow Council members as we know that any display other than utter respect would tarnish a visit to Prince's home and musical creation environment. There are many of us that will probably never make our way back to Minnesota and this is our only chance to visit Prince's home and your city. Opening it up for the week that contains ... Prince's Official Tribute will be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time and understanding. I hope and pray you will allow a temporary permit for the period of October 8 to 15th, 2016 for tours to occur. Respectfully yours, Jackie Lazar A friend of Prince and his memory Sent from my Whone Petersen, Chelsea From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Please see below. CP Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: Petersen, Chelsea Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:30 PM Campion, Dan; Ryan, Elise, Tjornhom, Bethany; Laufenburger, Denny; McDonald, Jerry Gerhardt, Todd Fwd: Please give me a chance of visit to Paisley Park from Tokyo. From: "Laufenburger, Denny"<DLaufenburgerAci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: October 5, 2016 at 8:37:45 PM CDT To: "Petersen, Chelsea"<CPetersen(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: Please give me a chance of visit to Paisley Park from Tokyo. Forward to council DENNY LAUFENBURGER Mayor, City of Chanhassen 612-327-6800 (cell) From: O REIKO rrkbeM2016Calamail.coml Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 7:04 PM To: Laufenburger, Denny Subject: Please give me a chance of visit to Paisley Park from Tokyo. To Mayor Laufenburge At first, My English is poor, so sorry. I'm a Japanese strong fan of Prince, I'm living in Tokyo. I'm disappointing to the council member's decision of Paisley Park Museum. I have reserved a ticket of the airline and the hotels and the rental cars. I have a ticket of Paisley Park VIP Tour on November. My total cost of this travel is about $3,000. It's not cheap. But these fee can't cancel anymore. It's too late. Who do you us to compensate for this damage of loss? I have read a Mayor's Letter. I can understand that citizen is suffered to difficult after Prince's death. Tokyo's citizen have a similar problem everyday,too. So I hope this decision would be good for everybody. Best regards sincerely, Japanese Prince Fan. R. OCHIAI October 4, 2016 City of Chanhassen City Council PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Dear Council Members: I am not a resident of your city so I know my thoughts and feelings won't carry any weight, but I felt I needed to express myself anyway. I'm not sure if you understand how much the opening of Paisley Park meant to some of Prince's fans. I can understand your concerns, but couldn't you allow them to open on a trial basis to see how things would go? They were selling tickets only through the end of this year. Couldn't you let them honor those tickets already sold and then evaluate whether to let them continue into 2017? You won't truly know how the traffic and influx of tourists will affect the town until you see it. The death of Prince affected many fans very deeply. I am by no means a nut case fanatic. I am a normal everyday married woman that happens to have loved Prince. When I learned of his death I was devastated. You might as well have told me that my mother had died. That's how shattered I was. Losing Prince was like losing a member of my family. Unlike a member of my family though, I was unable to attend any sort of funeral or memorial service. Being able to visit Paisley Park was going to be my chance to feel closer to him for a few moments and to pay my respects. There are other fans out there that feel just as lost without him and would have appreciated this chance to have some closure. I am coming to,the area for the tribute concert to celebrate his life but was more excited about being able to visit Paisley Park and pay my respects. You might decide in the future to allow the opening of the museum, but that won't help people like me that were coming from far away to attend the concert and visit Paisley Park. I can't just drive the 12 Y2 hours to get there any time I feel like it. Please reconsider letting them open next week, even if it is only for a few days for the fans coming to town for the tribute concert, or even a trial through the end of the year. The company that runs Graceland should be prepared and more than capable of running things smoothly. They have years of experience at handling the crowds. This really means a lot to me and to some of the other fans as well who were devoted to Prince. He was truly musical genius and the world isn't the same without him. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Krista Wilkerson Lexington, Kentucky Aanenson, Kate From: Phelps, Todd <Todd.Phelps@stinson.com> i 1V 1~ Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 11:59 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: RE: Paisley Park Attachments: 9371_Draft_7801AudubonRoad_Traffic_ParkingStudy_Supplement_161019.pdf Hi Kate, 1J Welcome back! I hope that you had a nice (albeit short) vacation. From our perspective, things went very well at PP last weekend. I was out there on Saturday afternoon at the busiest time and things were running very smoothly. 1 understand from the operator that there were on average 200 visitors per hour and between 2000-2400 per day. The tour hours ran from 9 am to 9 pm. The parking/buses from Southwest Transmit seemed to work well too. The operator had two employees at SWT and Len from SWT sent an email stating that from SWT's perspective, things were running smoothly. The newer route—left on Powers, right on Park, left on Audubon and entering (right only) and exiting (right only) out of the north gate worked well too. The Carver County Sheriffs Department was onsite and I have not heard of any incidents. The days of operation may be scaled back—depending upon demand (particularly over the winter months)—but I don't think those plans are firm yet. At this point, I don't think this possibility should go before the Council. Overall, things appear to be very successful and the operator, BTNA and the family are very pleased with how things are running. Relatedly, Matt Pacyna sent Paul Oehme the attached Supplement to the Traffic Study this morning. Some items to note: 1. SRF is recommending that the current route for entering and exiting the property continue to be through the current north entrance. Thus, we should take a "wait and see" approach to moving the north entrance and not include it as a condition in the PUD or Site Plan Agreement. 2. Also, there are 120 current parking spaces—most of which are not being utilized due to the "bus only" restriction. We like to ability to have up to 40 guest cars (plus employee cars) onsite per hour. It seems inconsistent to have 120 parking spaces (which were recently restriped) that aren't being utilized. We realize that there's a traffic component to this but as indicated in the Supplemental Study, the impacts are negligible. 3. Also, we like to take a "wait and see" approach to the parking lot expansion. We propose going with the "40 guest car per hour" restriction to see how things operate—before increasing this number or adding to the north parking lot. Here's the specific language from the Supplemental Study: N Based on obsen'ati ns during the first firs Museum events, the following aeons should be con.Wcrcd that were not preyiouslr discussed: 1) Continue to utilvc• the Powers Boulevard, Park Road, and :Audubon Road route for entering buses (when needed), as well as the existing Patslcy Park North Access. 'Iltis pis eudes the most efficient operations a% well as pro, odes the best maneuacrabihtr for buses within the sou•. I. Ruses should continue to exit the Paisley Park North Access and continue north along .ludubom Road to %IN I lighway i, 2) Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while rstncting access to "Bus Only" and "Right( )ut Only" for passenger ych¢Ics through signage. a. Thu restmti,m would limit the potential fur motonsts traveling south along Audubon Road. 1) Monitor parking to ensure the existing 124, parking spaces can meet the demand for the site and rcfinc the allowed amount guests per hour to ensure adequate parking is pro idtd a. O:iycn the anticipated peak guests under the car, mly scenam, (2,4 k X I guests per day/ I65 guests per hour), the existing 12tt parking spaces mar be uffxirnt to mart this demand, depending on the number of empl vee, and average guest length of star. 'Iris may limit the need to expand parking (m site beyond current conditions. i) Delay the parking Int expansion until the number of Museum guests arrisxng by car wamnn such expansion. i) 'Mem was minimal padcstrran acmm observed at the :Audubon Road and X'alky Ridge'I'rad North/Osprey lane intersection during the weekday pm. and Saturday midday peak hours. I'hcrcfiom, no additional pedestrian cnhanetmcnts arc recommended at this time. I'm around this afternoon if you'd like to discuss. Thanks. Todd Todd M. Phelps I Partner I Stinson Leonard Street LLP 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55402 T: 612.335.1871 1 M: 612.251.1049 1 F: 612.335.1657 todd.phelps@stinson.com I www.stinson.com Legal Administrative Assistant: Joleen Longbehn 1612.335.1989 1 joleen.longbehn@stinson.com This communication (including any attachments) is from a law firm and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please contact the sender for instructions concerning return or destruction, and do not use or disclose the contents to others. From: Aanenson, Kate[mailto:kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 11:14 AM To: Phelps, Todd Subject: Paisley Park Todd, I am hoping that you can give me a summary of the events at PP last weekend. I have heard that the days of operation may be scaled back. Would you get back to me with any updates. I have to get a report out the city council today for next Monday's Council meeting. Kate Kathryn Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Aanenson, Kate From: Len Simich <lsimich@swtransit.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 3:50 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: FW: Paisley Park parking From: Len Simich Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 8:44 AM To: 'Shannon Pratt' <spratt@officialpaisleypark.com> Subject: FW: Paisley Park parking Good morning Shannon, How did everything go this past Saturday. I didn't hear anything so I assume it all worked out. After this week, should P -Park be granted additional dates, and should you desire to use our parking, we should sit down and discuss. Let me know. Thanks. Len From: Len Simich Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:22 PM To: 'Shannon Pratt' <spratt@officialpaislevpark.com> Cc: Souriyong Souriya <ssourivaCcDswtransit.or¢>; Steve LaFrance <slafrance@swtransit.ore>; Mike Dartt <mdartt(@swtransit.oEg>;'Denny Laufenburger'<dlaufenbureer@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Jerry McDonald <imcdonaldCcDepleaalmn.com>; Gerhardt, Todd <TGerhardt@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: RE: Paisley Park parking Shannon, As discussed earlier today, SouthWest Transit is willing to extend parking at its Chanhassen Station Ramp to patrons attending tours at Paisley Park on the dates listed below for the same rate of $2,000 per day/$10,000 total. My staff accountant will send you a bill covering the following dates: • Thursday 10/13, • Saturday 10/15 • Friday 10/21, • Saturday 10/22 • Sunday 10/23. It should be noted that these days are in addition to the earlier dates allowed and already billed (Thursday, October 6; Saturday, October 8; and Friday, October 14). As we also discussed, parking should be directed to levels 3 & 4 in the ramp. Minor spill-over to stalls on lower floors is acceptable as long as stalls remain for SouthWest Transit's regular customers. We really want to protect our neighbors so all parking should only occur in the ramp. There is no weekend SouthWest Transit service, but the Dinner Theatre does use some of the stalls for their afternoon and evening performances. In our discussion you also indicated that you will continue to have staff on site to directing P -Park patrons where to park and to answer any questions they may have. I think this effort helps a lot. Good luck with the upcoming tours, and feel free to call if anything else comes up. Len SOUTHWEST TRANSIT Len Simich Chief Executive Officer and General Manager Phone: 952.974.3101 Mobile: 952.486.1898 Email: Isimich(a)swtransil oro Web: www.swtransit.orc ©® From: Shannon Pratt fmailto:soratt(aDofftcialpaisleypark.coml Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 201612:59 PM To: Len Simich <lsimichCdswtransit.org> Subject: Re: Paisley Park parking Hi Len, I'm running in and out of the office today but wanted to confirm we are able to utilize levels 3 and 4 of the ramp tomorrow and Saturday. We already have Friday scheduled. Tours will run from 9am-4:30pm tomorrow and on Saturday, 9am-9pm. We are expecting no more than 100 people per hour, probably less. There will be far fewer people than the original scheduled days. Thank you, Shannon On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Len Simicb <lsimich6swtransit.org> wrote: Shannon, I'm sure we can work something out. I'm out of town today but will give you a call tomorrow. Sent from my T -Mobile 4G LTE Device — Original message — From: Shannon Pratt <s[)rattCa)officialoaislevoark.com> Date: 10/11/16 10:23 AM (GMT-06:00) To: Len Simich <lsimich answtransit.ora> Subject: Paisley Park parking Hi Len, As you may have heard, we were granted another temporary permit for operating tours. We will be open this Thursday 10/13, Friday 10/14 (as you know) and Saturday 10/15 as well as next Friday 10/21, Saturday 10/22 and Sunday 10/23. With the exception of Friday, Oct 14, we will be keeping tours limited to approximately 100 people per hour. Would it be possible to utilize the SW Transit for these days? Please let me know if you have any questions. I look forward to hearing back from you. Best, Shannon Pratt P Park Management C: 818.434.8636 Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Chanhassen From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Tom Sachi, EIT, Engineer Date: October 19, 2016 Draft Memorandum Subject: 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Introduction SUN''& 0169371 SRF completed the 7801 Axdxbox Road Traffic and Parkin ,g Stxdy, dated September 15, 2016 to identify traffic and parking issues associated with the proposed Paisley Park Museum, as well as recommend potential improvements to address operations. However since completion of the original study, City staff requested additional traffic data within the area and the Museum has been open to the public This data focuses on locations previously collected as part of the original study and new locations to the south along Audubon Road. Furthermore, discussions with Paisley Park representatives indicate that changes to the Museum business plan are expected, specifically a reduction in the daily number of tour guests. Therefore, the main objectives of this supplement are to compare the traffic data collected (after Museum opening), evaluate intersection operations based on potential business plan modifications, and identify changes to the previous recommendations, if necessary. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations offered for consideration. Traffic Volume Comparison Intersection turning movement counts were collected along Audubon Road at MN Highway 5, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road between Thursday, August 25 and Sunday, August 28, 2016. However concerns were expressed that these volumes were collected prior to area schools being in session. Therefore, supplemental traffic and pedestrian counts were collected at the following locations along Audubon Road between Tuesday, October 12 and Sunday October 16, 2016 to understand potential school and preliminary Museum opening impacts. • MN Highway 5 * • Paisley Park North Access • Paisley Park South Access/McGlynn Road • Park Road * • Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane • Lyman Boulevard Intersections with an asterisk represent a location collected as part of both the original and supplemental studies. In addition to the intersection counts, daily traffic volumes were continuously collected along Audubon Road at two locations (.e. North of Sunridge Court and North of Coulter Drive) between Tuesday October 12 and Sunday October 16. These locations are consistent with previously collected average daily traffic volume locations provided by MnDOT. ONE CARLSON PUtKWAY, SUITE 150 1 MINNEAPOUs, MN 55447 1763.475.0010 1 WWWSRJ-'CONSULnNG.COM VISI RIFs IG N EMS CO.S.11 ng Gmup, Int. To: Paul Oehme, PE Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Chanhassen From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Tom Sachi, EIT, Engineer Date: October 19, 2016 Draft Memorandum Subject: 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Introduction SUN''& 0169371 SRF completed the 7801 Axdxbox Road Traffic and Parkin ,g Stxdy, dated September 15, 2016 to identify traffic and parking issues associated with the proposed Paisley Park Museum, as well as recommend potential improvements to address operations. However since completion of the original study, City staff requested additional traffic data within the area and the Museum has been open to the public This data focuses on locations previously collected as part of the original study and new locations to the south along Audubon Road. Furthermore, discussions with Paisley Park representatives indicate that changes to the Museum business plan are expected, specifically a reduction in the daily number of tour guests. Therefore, the main objectives of this supplement are to compare the traffic data collected (after Museum opening), evaluate intersection operations based on potential business plan modifications, and identify changes to the previous recommendations, if necessary. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations offered for consideration. Traffic Volume Comparison Intersection turning movement counts were collected along Audubon Road at MN Highway 5, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road between Thursday, August 25 and Sunday, August 28, 2016. However concerns were expressed that these volumes were collected prior to area schools being in session. Therefore, supplemental traffic and pedestrian counts were collected at the following locations along Audubon Road between Tuesday, October 12 and Sunday October 16, 2016 to understand potential school and preliminary Museum opening impacts. • MN Highway 5 * • Paisley Park North Access • Paisley Park South Access/McGlynn Road • Park Road * • Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane • Lyman Boulevard Intersections with an asterisk represent a location collected as part of both the original and supplemental studies. In addition to the intersection counts, daily traffic volumes were continuously collected along Audubon Road at two locations (.e. North of Sunridge Court and North of Coulter Drive) between Tuesday October 12 and Sunday October 16. These locations are consistent with previously collected average daily traffic volume locations provided by MnDOT. ONE CARLSON PUtKWAY, SUITE 150 1 MINNEAPOUs, MN 55447 1763.475.0010 1 WWWSRJ-'CONSULnNG.COM Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen October 19, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Pulsing Study Supplement Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours, as well as daily traffic volumes were reviewed for comparison purposes, which are illustrated in Figure 1 and described below. 1) Weekday non -Museum event pm. peak hour volumes from October at the Audubon Road intersections with MN Highway 5 and Park Road are approximately three (3) to eight (8) percent higher as compared to the August volumes collected. In general, the intersection travel patterns and magnitude are consistent between the two timeframes. The October weekday p.m. peak hour volumes were retried forward through the supplemental analysis. 2) Saturday midday peak hour volumes from October at the Audubon Road intersections with MN Highway 5 and Park Road are approximately ten (10) to 30 percent higher as compared to the August volumes collected. However, the difference is likely due to the Saturday Museum event. It should be noted that the Saturday midday peak hour volumes at these two locations are between 20 and 45 percent less than the weekday non -Museum p.m. peak hour conditions. 3) Pedestrian volumes collected during both August and October indicated limited activity during the weekday p.m. peak hour condition but an increase during Saturday midday conditions. 4) Daily traffic volumes collected along Audubon Road (shown in Chart 1) under a school, non - Museum event condition (Wednesday, October 12) are within +/- five (5) percent of previously collected data provided by MnDOT. This is generally within the typical daily volume variation of most roadways. a. Daily traffic volumes on Thursday and Friday, when Museum events took place, are approximately five (5) percent higher than the Wednesday data. This represents a daily traffic volume increase of approximately 160 to 230 vehicles per day (vpd). b. Daily traffic volumes on Saturday and Sunday were less than the data collected between Wednesday and Friday by approximately 1,500 to 2,500 vpd. Chart 1 Dalry Traffic Volume Comparison Page 2 Audubon Road Daily Traffic Volumes 5000 4364 4592 4478 M nDOT ADT - 4,400 4500 ....................... ............................................. _..................................................................... . 4000 3482 3611 3640 m 3500 Mn00T ADT - 3,300 E 3000 j 2500 2110 2145 • North of Couper Drive 8 2000 1504 < ■ North of Sunridge Court 1500 1000 ' 10/12/2016 10/13/2016 10/14/2016 10/15/2016 10/16/2016 Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Page 2 0(0)0 �► 0(0)0 H - m i (XX) p +�- ^rH t30 (45) NS ry m rvr t 13 (11) 2 n n 1 15291('115594) W5 + 1 I I r Y 911 (903)-e (124).50 o �80 (76) o N �74 }v all(997)976 3 (1090105�N c N n .10 (41) 31 5-i new a_� H � a 0(0)0 H 0(49).49 " (4,475) 4AIq t .:1•<7� XX �1. �1 (XX) October 2016 Peak Hour Volume +�- ^rH i o October Average Daily Traffic Volum( Q 25 (22) J B Signal Control t1 (it) 0 _m J ' N f N •- 1 (10) -9 ti?� ��,,� Existing Traffic Volume Comparison Figure 1 !•mWtinp t....uy bw 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement 00169371 City of Chanhassen Odlober 2016 LEGEND XX August 2016 Peak Hour Volume (XX) October 2016 Peak Hour Volume +�- Difference in Counts August Average Daily Traffic Volume October Average Daily Traffic Volum( Q Side -Street Stop Control B Signal Control ��,,� Existing Traffic Volume Comparison Figure 1 !•mWtinp t....uy bw 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement 00169371 City of Chanhassen Odlober 2016 Paul Oclurne, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Puking Study Supplement Intersection Capacity Comparison October 19, 2016 Based on the updated traffic data collected, a detailed intersection capacity analysis was completed for multiple scenarios under weekday p.m. peak hour conditions. Saturday midday conditions were not evaluated further since traffic volumes along both MN Highway 5 and Audubon Road are lower than the weekday p.m. peak hour condition, as noted earlier. The scenarios evaluated include existing conditions (October 2016, no Museum event) and three Museum event conditions (2,300 guests per day with Bus Only, and 2,000 and 4,700 guests per day with no busing). It should be noted that the 4,700 guests per day (65 guests per 10 -minute tour) was a previous assumption and only included for reference. Based on discussion with Paisley Park Management, the peak days are expected to have approximately 1,500 to 2,000 guests per day, with tours starting between 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. For analysis purposes, the 2,000 guests per day value was used to provide a conservative review, which equates to approximately 165 guests per hour or the equivalent of 150 vehicular trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour (75 entering and 75 exiting). This assumes an average 2.5 person per car vehicle occupancy and accounts for other services and employees. It should be noted that during the Museum (Bus Only) event that had approximately 2,300 guests on Friday, October 14, 2016, approximately eight (8) buses were observed entering/existing the site during the weekday p.m. peak hour. A general rule of thumb is that a single bus operates in a similar manner as the equivalent of two to three passenger vehicles from a roadway capacity perspective. Results of the intersection capacity analysis comparison, shown in Table 1, indicates that all study intersections operate or are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service under the scenarios identified. Note that overall LOS A through D is generally considered acceptable within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. All queues are expected to be maintained within the existing tum lane storage. The maximum southbound queues along Audubon Road at the Paisley Park South Access is expected to be 50 feet (i.e. two or three vehicles) under the 2,000 guest car -only scenario. A summary of the "2,300 guest bus only' and "2,000 guest car only' Museum event scenario volumes is shown in Figure 2. Tablel. Weekday PNI Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Comparison Audubon Road Intersection Scenario Level of Service (Delay) Existing (Oct 2016) No PP Event PP Event PP Event (2.3K Guests) (2K Guests) Bus Only Car Only PP Event (4.7K Guests) I Car Only MN Highway 5 B (17 sec.) B (19 sec.) B (19 sec.) C (25 sec.) Paisley Park North Access (1i A/B (10 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) Paisley Park South Access/McGlynn Road It' A/B (12 sec.) A/B (13 sec.) A/B (14 sec.) A/C (18 sec.) Coulter Boulevard 11' A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) Park Road t' A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane (1) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) Lyman Boulevard ill A/C (16 sec.) A/C (17 sec.) A/C (17 sec.) A/C (18 sec.) (1) Indicates an unsignalaed intersection with side.street stop control. where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach Los. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Page 4 R;, I Museum Event Conditions Figure 2 ,. ;�s,........ 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement 00169371 City of Chanhassen October 2016 Paul Ochme, City of Chanhassen October 19, 2016 7601 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Audubon Road (South of Park Road) Impacts During the weekday Museum event days observed (Thursday, October 13 and Friday, October 14), traffic volumes along Audubon Road north of Sunridge Court were approximately 130 to 160 daily vehicles higher than the 3,482 vehicles collected on Wednesday, October 12. Given that the Museum had required busing for the majority of the guests (excluding media, employees, and handicapped guests), the change in traffic volume is likely due to daily variation in traffic volumes, although some of the increase could be attributed to the Museum. If the Museum allowed a total of 2,000 guests per day along with the associated number of employees to serve the guests, the Museum would generate a total of approximately 1,700 to 1,800 vpd. Assuming approximately 15 percent of these guests may arrive via Audubon Road (from the South), which is consistent with the original study, the increase along Audubon Road would be approximately 250 to 275 vpd. This equates to approximately a 7.5 percent increase in volumes along Audubon Road (near SunRidge Court), which is relatively similar to the five (5) percent daily traffic volume variation observed and within the capacity of the roadway. Other Considerations Based on observations during the first few Museum events, the following items should be considered that were not previously discussed: 1) Continue to utilize the Powers Boulevard, Park Road, and Audubon Road route for entering buses (when needed), as well as the existing Paisley Park North Access. This provides the most efficient operations as well as provides the best maneuverability for buses within the site. a. Buses should continue to exit the Paisley Park North Access and continue north along Audubon Road to MN Highway 5. 2) Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to "Bus Only" and "Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. a. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. 3) Monitor parking to ensure the existing 120 parking spaces can meet the demand for the site and refine the allowed amount guests per hour to ensure adequate parking is provided. a. Given the anticipated peak guests under the car only scenario (2,000 guests per day/ 165 guests per hour), the existing 120 parking spaces may be sufficient to meet this demand, depending on the number of employees and average guest length of stay. This may limit the need to expand parking on site beyond current conditions. 4) Delay the parking lot expansion until the number of Museum guests arriving by car warrants such expansion. 5) There was minimal pedestrian activity observed at the Audubon Road and Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane intersection during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Therefore, no additional pedestrian enhancements are recommended at this time. II.\P*W\09000\9371\T.t\RO-A9i71_D,* 780IAWA-R od Ts4k PX**V )jVfk t 16101Y.Aa Page 6 0 U i OF MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: October 3, 2016 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 SUBJ-. Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 Fax:952.2271110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax:952.2271110 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recreation Center The applicant, Bremer Trust National Association, the Special Administrator of the 2310 Coulter Boulevard Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate a Plane: 952.227.1400 museum at Paisley Park. They are requesting a rezoning to Planned Unit Fax: 952.227.1404 Development (PUD) to allow a museum as a permitted use in the zoning district. Planning & The staff is recommending the PUD rezoning for the following reasons: Natural Resources Phone: 952.2271130 Fax: 952.227.1110 a Provides for limitations on how the building can be used including hours of operation and traffic flow and parking. Public works • Preserves the existing building. 7901 Park Place • Limited expansion preserves the existing trees. Phone: 952.227.1300 a Creates additional jobs. Fax: 952.227.1310 . Tourism generated supports the existing businesses. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1110 The Planning Commission held a public heating on September 20, 2016 to review the Website proposed rezoning. The Planning Commission voted six for and none against a motion www.d.chanhassen.mn.us recommending approval of the rezoning request. Chanhassen is a Community for Lite - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 2 The Planning Commission requested that City Council consider the following: • Review the proposed transportation plan. • Consider bus routes only on Highway 5. • Require a Pedestrian Safety Plan. • Require a time frame for the completion of improvements. The September 20, 2016 Planning Commission minutes are attached to this staff report. Following is a summary of the changes to the application since the Planning Commission meeting: 1. Offices were added as a permitted use. 2. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement has been added as a part for the PUD Ordinance. The applicant must submit a $25,000 escrow or letter of credit as a financial security to ensure the installation of the following improvements: a) Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left turn lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. b) Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. c) Install a paved connection between the northern and southern parking lots on the site by October 5, 2016. d) Relocate the northern access of the site 220 feet south of Highway 5 as shown in the September 15, 2016 SRF Traffic and Parking Study Option 1 by October 3, 2017. This relocated access shall be restricted to a right -out of the site. e) Sidewalks shall be installed within the site by October 3, 2017. f) A traffic study shall be completed within one year, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. 3. The PUD has been revised as follows specifying the development and regulations for the museum: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 3 e. Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated 9/15/2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -out only, relocating the Paisley Park north access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 3, 2016. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and Findings of Fact." ATTACHMENTS 1. PUD Ordinance. 2. Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 3. Findings of Fact. 4. SRF Traffic and Parking Study dated September 15, 2016. 5. Amended Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 20, 2016. 6. Planning Commission minutes dated September 20, 2016. 7. Emails. gAplan\2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museumkxecutive summary.doc IM Administration MEMORANDUM Phone: 2271100 Fax: 952.52.227.1110 TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 111111 MYOF FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director C SEN DATE: October 10, 2016 7700 Market Bouievarc SUBJ: Paisley Park Museum PO Bax 147 Staff will work with the operators o%Paisley Park Museum to provide Chanhassen. MN 55317 1. Memorial and fencing issues Engineering BACKGROUND Administration On October 3, 2016 the City Council reviewed the application from PRN Music Corporation Phone: 2271100 Fax: 952.52.227.1110 for a rezoning of Lot 11 Block 1 Chanhassen Lakes Business Park to PUD to permit a Fax: 9522271110 museum at Paisley Park. At that meeting, the City Council voted 3-2 to table this item for Building inspections additional information. City staff has meet with the applicant and has addressed the following Phone: 952.227.1180 issues: Fax 952.227.1190 Staff will work with the operators o%Paisley Park Museum to provide Phone 952227.1400 Fax 952.2271404 1. Memorial and fencing issues Engineering prohibiting access along the east side ofAudubon. Phone: 952.2271160 The museum has as virtual fence as apart of an exhibit. Items left on the Fax: 952.227.1170 physical fence have been removed and archived and included in this exhibit. Phone. 952.2271130 The museum is also adding memorabilia to include in the exhibit. Finance Trak Counts will be taken south of Lake Drive; this is in progress. Traffic Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax 952 227.1110 2• Posting of no parking on McGlynn Drive Park & Recreation Sta(%will prepare a No Parking resolution for the City Council to consider Phone 9522271120 along both sides of McGlynn Drina. Fax: 9522271110 3. Signage for pedestrian access to trail on west side of Audubon Recreation Carder 2310 Coulter Boulevard Staff will work with the operators o%Paisley Park Museum to provide Phone 952227.1400 Fax 952.2271404 pedestrian signage directing crossing at Hwy S and Audubon and prohibiting access along the east side ofAudubon. Planning & Natural Resources 4. Updated Traffic study Phone. 952.2271130 Fax:952.2271110 Trak Counts will be taken south of Lake Drive; this is in progress. Traffic Public Worts counts and traffic calming opportunities for pedestrian crossing 7901 Park Place enhancements will he considered. Phone 952.2271300 Fax:952.2271310 5. Civil plans for full build out of parking Senior Center SRF is preparing the civil plans jar the parking lot. Daft plans could be Phone: 952.2271125 submitted in approximately 2 months. Assumptions need to be made with Fax: 952.227.1110 respect to survey, geotech, and existing infrastructure conditions. An Websb additional week or two will be needed to get survey and geoteeh www.d.chanhassen.mn us information. Draft schematics will be ready sooner. Once plans are submitted, there will be review by the Watershed District. Construction could be ready to start spring 2017. Chanhassen is a Community for Life -' 1',J-, a 1 . Paisley Park Museum City Council Work Session Page 2 6. Buses required for all visits until parking lot is complete The operator is reducing the number tickets sold per hour and the numberpersons per tour until the full parking lot is built. The Council may consider buses only until the entire parking lot is completed. Adequate parkingfor cars is required for any busing arrangements. 7. Potential Trail along Audubon The City Council discussed the lack of sidewalk on the east side of Audubon Road. It is staff's recommendation and the operator of the Museum to discourage pedestrian walking along the east side of Audubon Road in front of Paisley Park. Currently there is a sidewalk on the west side of the Audubon. This sidewalk connects with the trial along Hwy 5 and via a controlled signal for crossing. This trial goes under Highway 5 and connects to Lake Ann Park. If a sidewalk was installed along the east side of Audubon it would terminate at the end of The Paisley Park property and may force pedestrians to cross mid - block. In order to deter pedestrian and traffic conflicts along the east side Audubon Road staff is recommending that low vegetative landscaping (junipers, roses and barberry) be placed between the curb and the fence line. g:lplan\2016 planning cascV2016-24 paisley park museum\cc mug 10-12-16 issum.dmx MEMORANDUM A�� - 4- 1 CITY OF C HANHASSE N - Chanhassen is a Community for Life -Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director DATE: October 24, 2016 ' SUBJ: Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, Findings of Fact and No Parking Resolution for McGlynn Drive." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At their Octobe& meeting the City Council discussed the changes ges that had been 1�t'/v made to date. The City Council tabled action on his item until Octob 4` The City Council approved 12 special events permits.;Ibfb will be conducted on Octob , 13,14,15,21, 22 & 23a. The Council requested that updated4rafE6 report be prepared as well as a report from the Sheriff s office on how the events were working. ANALYSIS From the operator's perspective, things ran smoothly on October 13, 14 and 151". They stated that on average, there were 200 visitors per hour and between 2000-2400 people visiting the museum per day. The tour hours ran from 9 am to 9 pm. The parking/buses from Southwest Transit (SWT) seemed to work well too. The operator had two employees at SWT and Len Simich from SWT sent an email stating that from SWTs perspective, things were running smoothly. PH 952.227.1100 • www.ei.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 w Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 24, 2016 Page 2 The newer route—left on Powers, right on Park, right on Audubon and entering (right only) and exiting (right only) out of the north gate worked well too. Attached is the SRF Draft Tra, ffic Study dated October 191. The study has the following considerations: "Based on observations during the first few Museum events, the following items should be considered that were not previously discussed: 1) Continue to utilize the Powers Boulevard, Park Road, and Audubon Road route for entering buses (when needed), as well as the existing Paisley Park North Access. This provides the most efficient operations as well as provides the best maneuverability for buses within the site. a. Buses should continue to exit the Paisley Park North Access and continue north along Audubon Road to MN Highway 5. 2) Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to "Bus Only" and "Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. a. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. 3) Monitor parking to ensure the existing 120 parking spaces can meet the demand for the site and refine the allowed amount guests per hour to ensure adequate parking is provided. a. Given the anticipated peak guests under the car only scenario (2,000 guests per day/165 guests per hour), the existing 120 parking spaces may be sufficient to meet this demand, depending on the number of employees and average guest length of stay. This may limit the need to expand parking on site beyond current conditions. 4) Delay the parking lot expansion until the number of Museum guests arriving by car warrants such expansion. 5) There was minimal pedestrian activity observed at the Audubon Road and Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane intersection during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Therefore, no additional pedestrian enhancements are recommended at this time." The Carver County Sheriff's Office observed the Vehicle and pedestrian patterns October 6-8 and 13-15. (see attached memo). Overall they public safety impact was minimal or non-existent, for instance, the first three days of operation resulting in only one minor medical call for a patron. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 24, 2016 Page 3 The applicant is requesting that 40 guest cars be permitted to park on site, not to exceed 40 guest cars per hour. This would be separate from employees or contractors. Buses would still be used in those times when guests would exceed the 40 -stall guest cars per hour maximum. This would be in place until the parking lot is expanded. Staff has modified the PUD Ordinance and Site Performance Agreement based on the recommendations received, as well as prepared the no Parking Resolution for McGlynn Drive. RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and Findings of Fact; and No Parking Resolution on McGlynn Drive." ATTACHMENTS 1. PUD Ordinance. 2. Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 3. Findings of Fact. 4. No Parking Resolution 5. SRF Traffic and Parking Study Supplement dated October 19, 2016. 6. Memo form Lieutenant Eric Kittelson 7. Executive Summary from October 10, 2016 \kM\cfs5�shared_data\plan\2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museum\2 ezautive summary 10-24-16AM Memo TO: Kate Aanenson, Chanhassen City Planner FROM: Lieutenant Eric Kittelson, Chanhassen Liaison DATE: October 16, 2016 RE: Paisley Park Zoning Carver County Sheriff's Office staff observed vehicle and pedestrian patterns on October 6-8 and 13-15 from 0900-2100 hours on Audubon Road south of MN Highway 5 and north of Lake Drive West. The purpose of the qualitative analysis was to determine the impact of Paisley Park operations when operating under the special use permit. Vehicle and pedestrian impact to the surrounding area is negligible with a low amount of increased pedestrian traffic and vehicular traffic. This is under current operating standards with bussing of patrons to the venue. Obviously a change in this process would result in a different impact to the area. Deputies patrolled the area hourly during the weekdays and were on-site for twelve hour shifts on the weekend days (paid for by off-duty contract through Paisley Park). The process improved greatly from the first three days to the second three days already. Here are observations to consider moving forward: • Media was reminded on the first day of opening that they may not park on the sidewalk or boulevard on the west side of Audubon Road as this is no longer 'breaking news'. Once reminded they moved to McGlynn Road and we have had no further issues • VIP parking inside the property was allowed the first weekend. Parking on the second weekend was relegated to disabled and employee parking only. This had a positive impact on the scenario. • There were a number of people getting dropped off or picked up by private parties, Uber driver's and taxi drivers. The private parties were directed to the park and ride and some chose to park on McGlynn Road and thus created pedestrian traffic crossing Audubon Road. • The coach bus transporting the majority of patrons came and left approximately every 25 minutes and appeared to be % full most times. Overall, the public safety impact was minimal or non-existent. For instance, the first three days of operation resulted in only one minor medical call for a patron. Page 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 553 10/11/2016 12:03 PM Receipt No. 00328641 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Shannon Pratt 642 Amherst Drive ------------------------------------------------------- Temp Event 50.00 Total 50.00 Cash Check 477 Change 0.00 50.00 0.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 10/04/2016 4:09 PM Receipt No. 00328001 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Alison & Chad Hauck Alison Hauck Photography 6334 Country Road 8 SE St Cloud MN 56304- Paisly Park ------------------------------------------------------- Temp Event 50.00 Total Cash Check 3955 Change 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 09/30/2016 11:11 AM Receipt No. 00327852 CLERK: JoleneB PAYEE: P Park Management LLC 603 Sweetland Ave Hillside NJ 07205 - Paisley Park- PUD Deposit ------------------------------------------------------- Security Escrow 25,000.00 Total Cash Check 1006 Change 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 Media Contact: Marcia Jensen 651-312-3708 majensen@bremer.com T Bremer FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Prince's Iconic Paisley Park to Open for Public Tours this Fall St. Paul, Minn., August 24, 2016— Paisley Park, Prince's extraordinary private estate and production complex in Chanhassen, Minnesota, will open for daily public tours starting October 6, 2016. The family of Prince Rogers Nelson and Estate special administrator, Bremer Trust, are pleased to share this plan to realize Prince's long-term vision for the property. Millions of Prince fans worldwide will have the unprecedented opportunity to tour the legendary, 65,000 - square -foot complex, which served as the production studio and creative oasis for one of the greatest and most beloved music artists of all time. "Opening Paisley Park is something that Prince always wanted to do and was actively working on," stated Tyka Nelson, Prince's sister. "Only a few hundred people have had the rare opportunity to tour the estate during his lifetime. Now, fans from around the world will be able to experience Prince's world for the first time as we open the doors to this incredible place." An application for development review and business plan have been submitted to the City of Chanhassen. The plan calls for tapping the operational expertise of an experienced property management team, which will also provide initial funding for capital improvements. The Estate will maintain ownership of the property. "The Estate is working with the family to form an advisory council who will provide valuable input on the entire experience," said Bremer Trust President Craig Ordal. As outlined in the plan, guided tours will take visitors throughout the extensive main floor of Paisley Park, including the recording and mixing studios where Prince recorded, produced and mixed most of his biggest hits. Tours will also include Prince's video editing suites, rehearsal rooms, private NPG Music Club, and a massive soundstage and concert hall where he rehearsed for tours and held exclusive private events and concerts. Also featured will be thousands of artifacts from Prince's personal archives, including iconic concert wardrobe, awards, musical instruments, artwork, rare music and video recordings, concert memorabilia, automobiles and motorcycles. This will be an unprecedented and extraordinary opportunity for fans to experience first-hand what it was like for Prince to create, produce and perform inside this private sanctuary and remarkable production complex, which is also considered one of the greatest landmarks in the entertainment industry. "The new Paisley Park museum will offer fans a unique experience, an exhibition like no other, as Prince would have wanted it," according to the official statement by Prince's siblings. "Most important, the museum will display Prince's genius, honor his legacy, and carry forward his strong sense of family and community." Museum tickets will go on sale on August 26, 2016 at 2 p.m. CT for tours starting October 6, 2016. Visit OfficialPaisleyPark.com for ticket information and future Paisley Park updates. FINAL 1:15 p.m.8/23/16 In addition to the opening of the Paisley Park museum, Prince will be remembered and memorialized with an official family tribute concert on October 13, 2016 at U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis. Additional details and information on concert ticket sales will be released soon. Prince sold over 100 million records worldwide, making him one of the best-selling artists of all time. He won seven GRAMMY® Awards, a Golden Globe Award and an Academy Award® for the film "Purple Rain," all of which are displayed at Paisley Park. He was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 2004, the first year of his eligibility. Prince was born in Minneapolis and made Chanhassen his home. Throughout his life he was actively engaged in his community and quietly supported local schools and nonprofits. Paisley Park is located at 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota, approximately 30 minutes from Minneapolis. Paisley Park media inquiries should be directed to David Beckwith at David ()thebeckwithcomganv.com About Bremer Financial Corporation Bremer Trust is a subsidiary of Bremer Financial Corporation, a privately held $10 billion regional financial services company jointly owned by the Otto Bremer Trust and Bremer employees. Founded in 1943 by Otto Bremer, the company provides a comprehensive range of banking, wealth management, investment, trust and insurance services throughout Minnesota, North Dakota and Wisconsin. Clients include individuals and families, mid-sized corporations, small businesses, agribusinesses, nonprofits, and public and government entities. For more information visit Bremer.com. © 2016 Bremer Financial Corporation. All rights reserved. FINAL 1:15 p.m.8/23/16 9/122016 GmaiI - Confirmation receipt: Kristine booked you a ticketfor OfMdBJ Paisley Park Tour GA! Saturday, Oct 15 at 7:00pm Passbook View On Web or Download Here Cl) U ... Map data ®2016 G00911- Paisley oogle Paisley Park Studios 7801 Audubon Rd, Chanhassen, MN 55317 USA Thank you for purchasing tour tickets to Paisley Park. We look forward to welcoming you to Prince's extraordinary private estate and production complex. IMPORTANT TOUR INFORMATION You MUST bring an electronic or printed copy of your ticket for your scheduled tour and arrive on your scheduled date, prior to the start time of your tour. ACCESS TO PAISLEY PARK: Due to limited parking, please note that J visitors will only be permitted entry to the Paisley Park parking lot 20 minutes prior to their tour start time. In order to allow all fans the opportunity to share in the experience, all visitors will need to exit the parking lot within 10 minutes following the completion of their tour. If you have any further questions regarding your visit, please email info@OfficialPaisleyPark.com httpsItmei I.google corn hna 1Ak ?u1=2&1k=111 dd86ae9&view=pt&search�irbox&h= 15709eb99b112609&siml= 1.5709ab99b112609 213 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 97 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Bus. Phone 952-227-1152 MEMORANDUM Date: September 1, 2016 To: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director From: Don Johnson, Fire Chief Subj: Initial Response to Paisley Business Plan The Fire Marshal and I have reviewed the business plan provided by Stinson Leonard Street for the potential rezoning and use of the Paisley Park property. The following summarizes comments from the Fire Department. Hours of Operations The major issue relates to the multiple uses for building. As a museum and recording studio, the hours of operation are acceptable to the number of potential occupants and days/times listed. Some consideration needs to be given to an alternative use of a concert hall which I will cover later in this document. Parking Plan Regardless of approved use, a minimum of a 20' access to areas of any part of the building must be maintained to allow emergency vehicle access and egress during hours of operation. I am not concerned about out lots at this point. A proposed site plan, to include actual parking areas, should be provided so the Fire Marshal can indicate fire lanes etc. Building Use In the planned use they loosely imply that the use could be as a concert hall. Historically, these concerts have been scheduled with no notice and no access. The major issue relates to the open configuration of the main sound stage. The configuration has changed dramatically and involves temporary seating. I Consideration should be given to; Either require a special event permit for any event that would involve the concert use of this property to ensure appropriate stage and seating configurations, parking, are reviewed and approved by the building official, fire department, and planning department. Or; Create a fixed seating and stage arrangement utilizing an appropriate architect negating the need for permit requirements unless a deviation from the approved plans is necessary. Approved occupancy would be based on the arrangement and approved by the building official. Fire Inspections The last on-site fire inspection was conducted in 2015. I have been working with Bremer Bank representatives to correct several open violations from that inspection. It should be noted that none of the open violations are of a serious nature. The most serious relates to off hours' access to the building which is currently being worked on with an outside contractor Prior to opening, and pending planning approval, the building will need a complete fire inspection based on the new building classification. That inspection can be conducted as soon as possible and should not dramatically change any requirements already existing for the current building classification as a B Occupancy. This inspection will also identify any work done to remedy open violations from the 2015 inspection. Storage Area Within the planned use, the document refers to a storage area. I am confused if this is indoors or outdoors. The document eludes that vehicles, including a bus, may be stored for display. I am also to understand that the viewing areas are all on the main level leading me to believe that this does not include the parking garage specifically designed for parking vehicles. If the plan is to park vehicles indoors for viewing, a fire protection engineer should review and approve the site plan ensuring the current suppression system can cover the fire load increase created by the vehicles. Please let me know if you have any questions or need clarification on these comments. Ll IM I ENGINEERS P EAN NERS DESIGNERS Consulting Group. Inc. SRF Na 0169411 September 22, 2016 Dr. Claire Bleser District Administrator Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District 14500 Martin Drive, Suite 1500 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Subject: 7801 Audubon Road Parking Improvements Dear Dr. Bleser. This communication is a follow up to discussions I had with you and Scott Sobiac in regard to minor parking lot improvements at 7801 Audubon Road in the City of Chanhassen, with the end goal to obtain concurrence that a watershed district permit is not required for the minor improvement. To recap, the National Entertainment Collectibles Association (NECA), in conjunction with Bremer Trust -National Association, who is representing the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, are completing plans for the Paisley Park Museum at 7801 Audubon Road. The museum opening is scheduled for October 6, 2016, pending City approval. As part of the museum preparation a traffic and parking lot study was conducted to understand existing and proposed operations. The study yielded one specific improvement that is required prior to the museum opening in order to mitigate queuing impacts at Audubon Road and MN Highway 5. The improvement consists of connecting the south and north parking lots and implementing directional traffic such that the south access is the entrance and the north access is an exit -only (see Figure 1: Parking Lot Circulation). To facilitate the parking lot connection and directional traffic a ten -foot wide, 231 -foot long bituminous drive is being proposed on the west side of the museum. The drive will be a rural section (no curb and gutter) and will drain to the west to a 47 -foot wide pervious lawn section. In total, the new impervious is 2,310 square feet, which is below the 5,000 square feet permit threshold. The grading will be less than six inches on average over the 2,310 square -foot area. This equates to approximately 43 cubic -yards, which is also below the 50 cubic -yard permit threshold. This information is presented for your consideration and concurrence that a district peunit is not required. Your timely review and response is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, SRF /CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Eric D. Roerish, PE (MN WI) Principal EDR/iaf Attachment: Figure 1 - Parking Lot Circulation cc: Scott Sobiac, BARR Engineering; Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen; Todd Phelps, Stinson Leonard Street; Alison Hauck, Bremer Trust, National Association; Joel Weinshanker, National Entertainment Collectibles Association (NECA); Matt Pacyna, SRF \\rr-mpl,l\RgDnm\Prgrdr\091X,4%\9371\Dminag9411\7801Amdxb=RmdPo-kin,glwl"P mnl.dc- www.srfcons ulting.com One Carlson Parkway Nonh, Suite 150 1 Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 1 763,475.0010 fax: l.Rf -440.6364 An Cgaal Opponanily Employ" Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 September 29, 2016 Robert Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Paisley Park Traffic Study MnDOT Review #STUDY 16-002 SE Quad of TH 5 and Audubon Rd Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1009 Dear Mr. Generous, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Paisley Park Traffic Study. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the study and has the following comments: Water Resources: A Drainage permit will be required for the proposed developer plan. Please submit the following with the drainage permit application for review and approval: Hydraulic calculations and models to show that the proposed flows to MnDOT right-of-way will remain the same or be less than existing conditions for 2, 10, and 100 year Atlas 14 storm events. - Drainage area maps with flow arrows for existing and proposed conditions. The area map labeling should be consistent with the Hydrocad model area input. - Proposed project plan that has pond and site grading plan. The drainage permit application can be found at: htm'//www.dot.state.mn.us/utility/forms.html- Amnlication for Drainage Permit The MnDOT Drainage Permits Checklist can be found at: http'//ihub/metro/wre/Link°/u2OFiles/Drainage%2OPermit"/`20AI)vlications%2OChccklist.i)df For questions regarding these comments, please contact Hailu Shekur, Metro Water Resources, at hailu.shekur(d,state.mn.us or 651-234-7521. Permits: As previously stated, a drainage permit is required. Additionally, any use of or work within or affecting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at hhtt -//www dot state mn us/metro/maintenance/permits html Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (buck.craiR statc.mn.us or 651-234-7911) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf version of the plans. MnDOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us provided that each separate e-mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: MnDOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disc. 4. Plans can also be submitted to MnDOT's External FTP Site. Please send files to: fti)://ftt)2.dot.state.mn.us/i)ub/incominpjMetroWatersEdp,ciplanning Internet Explorer doesn't work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodeweviews.dot(a),state.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 2347793. Sincerely, /I l'ad Michael J. Corbett, PE Principal Planner Copy sent via E -Mail: Nancy Jacobson, Design Hailu Shekur, Water Resources Jesse Larson, Traffic Clare Lackey, Traffic Douglas Nelson, Right -of -Way Buck Craig, Permits Molly Kline, Area Engineer Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHANHASSEN 0 Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: Agency Review Response Deadline: Date Application Filed: August 22, 2016 September 8, 2016 August 22, 2016 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Kate Aanenson, AICP 952-227-1139 kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Community Development Director Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: September 20, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. October 3, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. October 26, 2016 Application: Request to rezone property located at 7801 Audubon Road from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development IOP to facilitate the use of the buildin as a museum. PlanningCase: 2016-24 Web Pa e: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-24 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Attorney ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Chaska ® Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ❑ Eden Prairie ® Engineer ❑ Jackson Township ® Fire Marshal Watershed Districts: ❑ Minnetonka El Shorewood ® Forester ❑ Carver County WMO ® Park Director E] Victoria ® Water Resources ❑ Lower River a F] Law Enforcement E] Minnehha Creek Adiacent Counties: ® Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek E] Hennepin Carver County Agencies: Utilities: El ❑ Community Development ❑ Cable TV — Mediacom School Districts: ❑ Engineer ❑ Electric — Minnesota Valley ❑ Environmental Services ❑Electric —Xcel Energy ElEastern Carver County 112 ❑ Historical Society ❑ Magellan Pipeline ❑ Minnetonka 276 ❑ Parks ❑ Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy ❑ Soil & Water Conservation District ❑ Phone — CenturyLink Other Agencies: State Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority ❑ Board of Water & Soil Resources ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ❑ Health ❑ SouthWest Transit ❑ Historical Society ❑ TC&W Railroad ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ® Transportation 2oko -a Y' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHANHASSFN Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 q APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ) Submrtlal Dale'. J'22- 1 PC Dale. i) j cc Date. 10 60 -Day Review Date. 4C b3 Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) IRefer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) ❑� Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts*. ..................... $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: (_ thousand square feet) 'Include number of existing employees: Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots.......................$600 + $15 per lot (_ lots) Variance (VAR) .................................................... ❑Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) r-1 Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ......................................... $150 ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 'Additional esuow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. NotificationSign (City to install and remove)..................................................................................................................... $200 Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address (_ addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements( easements) TOTAL FEE: $750.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Museum at Paisley Park, 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Property Address or Location: Parcel #: 25.1900110 Legal Description: 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN 55317 See attached. Total Acreage: 9.01 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes V1 No Present Zoning: Industrial Office Park District (IOP) Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Present Land Use Designation: Office/Industrial Requested Land Use Designation: Office/Industrial Existing Use of Property: Recording studio, soundstage, performance hall, office and warehouse/storage ❑� Check box is separate narrative is attached. Section 3: Property APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name N/A Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Celt: Email. Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: PRN Music Corporation, c/o Bremer Trust, N.A. Contact: Alison A. Hauck Address: 1100 West St. Germain Street Phone: (320) 258-2448 City/State/Zip: Saint Cloud, MN 56302 Cell: (320) 260-1722 Email: AAHauck@Bremer.com Fax: (320) 259-9120 n Signature: /, b Q/' Date: 8/19/16 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Contact: Matt Pacyna, PE Address: One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 Phone: (763) 249-6726 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 Cell: (612) 382-2546 Email: mpacyna@srfconsulting.com Fax (763) 475-2429 Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: M Property Owner Via 2] Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: Stinson Leonard Street LLP, c/o Todd M. Phelps ❑ Applicant Via: []Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: 150 South Fifth St. Suite 2300 ❑� Engineer Via: ❑� Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: Minneapolis MN 55402 ❑� Other' Via: ❑� Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: todd.phelps(a)stinson.com INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing (required). SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM STINSON LEONARD STREET August 19, 2016 HAND DELIVERED Kathryn R. Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED 11u:, / i 1016 CHANHASSEN PLANNING OF" Todd M. Phelps 612.335.1871 DIRECT 612.335.1657 DIRECT FAX todd.phelps@stinson.com Re: Application for Development Review -7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN. Our File No: 3009435.0002 Dear Ms. Aonenson: This letter is submitted on behalf of Bremer Trust, National Association (the "Special Administrator'), the court-appointed Special Administrator of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson (the "Estate"), in support of the enclosed Application for Development Review (the "Application') for the real property and improvements owned by the Estate located at 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, Minnesota, legally described as Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part of said Lot 11, shown as Parcel 220 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-1 . (the "Pro a "). Enclosed please find the following: 1. The Application to rezone the Property from Industrial Office Park District (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). 2. A check in the amount of $750.00, payable to the City of Chanhassen. 3. The Paisley Park Museum Business Plan, which sets forth in greater detail the proposed use of the Property as a museum to honor the late Prince Rogers Nelson. In further support of the enclosed Application, the Special Administrator submits the following pursuant to Article VIII "Planned Unit Development District" of the City of Chanhassen Zoning Code: Sec. 20-501. Intent. The rezoning of the Property from IOP to PUD for use as a museum is supported by the intent of the PUD zoning for a number of reasons. First, the use of the Property as a museum preserves the unique recording studios, soundstage, performance hall, and artwork that was created in the City of Chanhassen over a 30 -year period by a world - 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET, SUITE 2300 • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 www.stinsonleonard.com 612.335.1500 MAIN • 612.335.1657 FAX CORE/3009435.0002/ 128640409.1 August 19, 2016 Page 2 renowned artist, who sold over 100 million records, won seven Grammy Awards, a Golden Globe Award, and an Academy Award for the film 'Purple Rain," all of which are displayed at the Property. Second, the PUD zoning will offer enhanced flexibility for the Property to allow for the museum, continued use of the recording studios, soundstage, performance hall, offices and warehouse/storage, as well as for limited food service and merchandise sales, as further described in the Business Plan. Third, the PUD zoning is consistent with the City of Chanhassen 2030 Land Use Plan, which designates the Property as Office/Industrial. Under Section 20-792 of the Code, museums are a permitted use in the "OI" Office and Institutional District. Sec. 20-502. Allowed Uses. The primary use of the Property will be as a museum. However, as further described in the Business Plan, we anticipate that the Property will continue to be used as a recording studio, soundstage, and performance hall. Additionally, limited food service and merchandise sales will be uses ancillary to the museum use. Sec. 20.503. District Size and Location. The Property is approximately 9.01 acres and thus meets the minimum size requirements under the Code. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration of the Special Administrator's Application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (612) 335-1871. Sincerely, STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP 4V( ALI 1�14614y� Todd M. Phelps TMP/jl CORF/3009435.0002/ 128640409.1 PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM BUSINESS PLAN August 19, 2016 Bremer Trust, National Association, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate a museum at Paisley Park, 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN, the former recording studio of Prince Rogers Nelson. The family of Prince is supportive of operating Paisley Park as a museum and believes that this is what Prince would have wanted for all of his fans. Paisley Park Facility has entered into an Exhibition Operating Agreement, with PP Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Graceland Holdings, LLC to operate the Exhibition. The management team of Graceland Holdings, LLC has been involved in the operations of Graceland in Memphis, Tennessee since 1982. Graceland has over 30 years. of experience, having handled in excess of 20 million visitors and 8 million vehicles during that time, including all aspects related to traffic and attendance management, ticket control, security, retail and food and beverage service as part of Graceland and operating a similar museum facility and tours. Graceland's experienced management team will be providing development, management, and oversight of all aspects of the museum at Paisley Park. In recent years, Graceland has over 600,000 guests per year, while maintaining an amicable relationship with the City of Memphis and neighbors of Graceland. Graceland is in the process of expanding its operations to include operation of a hotel complex a few blocks from the Graceland mansion which is scheduled to open in October 2016 and also opening up a World's Fair entertainment complex across the street from the Graceland mansion which is scheduled to be open in March 2017. Graceland Holdings is highly committed to this project and making it success for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson as well as the local and broader Twin Cities community. Toward that end Graceland is providing the initial funds for capital improvement and initial operating costs of the museum. The following is the proposed business plan for the Paisley Park museum operations: Building Construction — We do not anticipate any exterior construction at the site, other than items related to the parking lot. In terms of interior construction, we anticipate widening doorways, adding lighting, motion detectors, and sound systems in areas of the facility. We will also be completing various improvements required for fire safety purposes. As previously reviewed with the City of Chanhassen, we will also be replacing the existing chiller/boiler at the facility. Operations — We plan to open the Museum in early October (subject to obtaining all approvals required by the City of Chanhassen). The family of Prince Rogers Nelson has an Official Family Tribute Concert scheduled for Thursday, October 13a' at U.S. Bank Stadium, and the plan is to have the Museum open in advance of that so that out of town visitors and others that attend the Tribute Concert will also be able to complete a tour of Paisley Park. We anticipate operating the Museum from 10 am to 10 pm during the week and from 9 am to midnight on weekends, although we will vary these hours based on ticket demands and may have less hours during the week or in winter months. At this time, it is difficult for us to predict peak hours, but we anticipate heavier traffic in evenings and weekends. 128637840.2 Tickets to the Museum will be sold only online and will not be able to be purchased at the site. We will not permit any walk-up entry. Tickets will be for a specific time tour and guests will be permitted to park and enter Paisley Park only 20-30 minutes early. This time frame and limited access will be strongly emphasized in ticketing and repeated messaging to guests. The length of the tour will be approximately 70 minutes and guests will be required to exit within 30-45 minutes after the conclusion of their tour. The maximum guest stay during peak times will be 2 hours. Tours will be guided tours and will start in 10 minute increments and each tour is expected to include 25-30 guests. We anticipate a total of 1500 to 2000 guests per day on peak days. Ticket prices will be $38.50 for standard tickets. A VIP Tour experience will also be offered for smaller guests groups with prices of $100 or more. Guided tours will take guests through the recording and mixing studios, video editing rooms, rehearsal rooms, Prince's private NPG Music Club, and the soundstage and performance hall. The tour will be contained to the main floor of the facility and will be indoors, except for an exit from the performance hall to the storage garage where cars and the tour bus will be able to be viewed. We will add a tent to the breezeway passage from the performance hall to the storage garage. We anticipate employing 20 to 60 people from the local area during the museum's operating hours. This amount will vary based on the tour volumes and times. We will also be engaging a substantial number of local contractors and service providers to ready the facility for operations by early October. Traffic/Parking — The facility currently includes approximately 90 parking spaces in its front parking area. We plan to further expand the parking area to the east to add an additional 40-50 spots. In addition, because we will be utilizing parking attendants we would anticipate being able to "double-park" cars based on knowing what times people will be exiting the facility and can utilize an additional 28-30 spots based on this method of parking. This will result in total parking of approximately 160 spaces. Based on Graceland's experience, we estimate that there will be 2.5 guests per vehicle, which based on the anticipated attendance and tour times equals 60 vehicles per hour and a maximum of 150 vehicles parked at any given time given the ticketed tour windows and a maximum guest stay of 2.0 hours in peak time periods. As noted below, we also anticipate as many as 20% of guests being shuttled from other locations particularly during peak hours. We will expand the front gate area to include a coned cul-de-sac area so that cars can easily exit from Audubon Road. We will have parking attendants that will immediately review parking tickets and time windows to confirm if a vehicle can enter the parking lot. If a guest's allotted time period has not yet arrived, the attendant will direct the car to exit the cul-de-sac and return during the ticketed time period. The attendants will also be patrolling the exterior fence and Audubon Road to prevent any cars from stopping along the road or otherwise causing traffic congestion. We will have parking attendants that will direct parking. We will be adding lighting to the parking lot to the extent there is not sufficient lighting currently there. In the future, we may utilize land across Audubon Road for additional parking. 2 128637840.2 A traffic study related to the facility is being prepared and will be submitted to the Planning Commission. On our current estimates, the traffic volumes will be less than the volume of cars entering the nearby General Mills facility based on observed traffic study there. We expect to utilize the back parking lot and garage for employees of the facility to park and will also utilize off-site shuttle and parking for employees. We are also making arrangements with bus companies to conduct shuttle trips from the airport and/or the Mall of America area. Security —"The Museum will have 24x7 security. We will install a new security system. The Museum will hire security guards and supervisors for its operations. Food & Drink — The Museum will offer food and beverage at the conclusion of the tour. There will be no alcoholic beverages sold or permitted to be consumed at the facility. The food is anticipated to be a limited item of vegetarian items including a tasting plate, dessert, and select sandwiches. We are interviewing vendors to provide the food and anticipate that while some food would be prepared offsite and delivered daily that there would be select portions of the menu that would be prepared on site. The Museum anticipates erecting a tent connected (or semi -attached) to the exit near the restrooms in a portion of the exterior parking area where guests could sit for a brief period to eat upon conclusion of the tour. (See attached exterior map). There will be no smoking permitted at the facility. Merchandise — The Museum will include sales of merchandise on-site including apparel, guidebooks and other souvenirs. Other Events — Paisley Park will continue to be utilized as a recording studio for special sessions. In addition, we anticipate that concerts will also continue to be held in the performance hall. There would be no events outside. No events are anticipated to be held until at least March 2017 and no arrangements or bookings have been made related to future events. We anticipate that such events will be held on Friday or Saturday weekend and that offsite parking arrangements will be made. Based on square footage of the performance hall the attendees at events could be up to 1500 people at one time. Studio and concert usage of the facility will be limited in order to avoid interfering with tour attendance. Future Activities — While future plans have not been developed, some of the additional potential uses or ancillary operations for Paisley Park include additional parking and potential development and completion of the exterior round building. We may also develop onsite limited occupancy lodging in the future. 3 128637840.2 See Attached Facility Map 128637840.2 entrance expansion proposed lot extension r proposed tent 7 r /a.,. Paisley Park / aj 0 i Property Card Parcel ID Number 251900110 Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name PRN MUSIC CORPORATION C/O BREMER TRUST NA Mailing Address SAINT CLOUD, MN 56302-0986 Property Address Address 7801 AUDUBON RD City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 Building Information Building Style Above rade Bedrooms Last Sale Finished S Ft $1,301,300.00 Year Built Garage N Bathrooms Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0112 1 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N I N I N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2015 Values (Payable 2016) 2016 Values (Payable 2017) Last Sale Land $1,301,300.00 $1,301,300.00 Date of Sale Building $5,430,500.00 $5,712,500.00 Sale Value Total $6,731,800.00 $7,013,800.00 The dae pro viacd herewnh is for reference purposes only This data is not suitable for legalengineering, surveying mother similar purposes. Caner County does not guarantee the accuracy of the Informahm, contained herein. This data is fumished on an as is basis and Craver County makes no representations or warrani either expressed or impkedfor the merohanta&IM or gbtess of the information provided for any purpose. This disclaimer is poneh d pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 4466.03 and Me user of the data provided herein acknowledges that Caner County shall not be liable for any damagesand by using the data in any way expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend. indemnity, and hold harmless Caryer County, As officials, officers, agents. employeesetc. hard any and all claims brought by anyone who uses Me information provided for herein. As employees or agents, to CARVER third padres which arse out of users access. By acceptance of Otis data. the user agrees not to aaesma this data or provide access to it or any pad of it to another partly unless the user includes COUNTY will, Me data a copy of this disclaimer. Tuesday, August 30, 2016 Carver County. MN STINSON LEONARD STREET CHECK NO: 268419 CHECK DATE: 08/19/16 REF INVOICE # DATE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PAID 384042 081916 08/19/16 TOTAL 750.00 $750.00 LJ ,�� I ENGINEERS P TANNERS DESIGNERS Consulting Group, Inc. To: Paul Oehme, PE Draft Memorandum Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Chanhassen From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Tom Sachi, ETT, Engineer Date: October 19, 2016 Subject: 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Introduction SRFNa 0169371 SRF completed the 7801 Andnbon Road Tn? t and Parking Study, dated September 15, 2016 to identify traffic and parking issues associated with the proposed Paisley Park Museum, as well as recommend potential improvements to address operations. However since completion of the original study, City staff requested additional traffic data within the area and the Museum has been open to the public. This data focuses on locations previously collected as part of the original study and new locations to the south along Audubon Road. Furthermore, discussions with Paisley Park representatives indicate that changes to the Museum business plan are expected, specifically a reduction in the daily number of tour guests. Therefore, the main objectives of this supplement are to compare the traffic data collected (after Museum opening), evaluate intersection operations based on potential business plan modifications, and identify changes to the previous recommendations, if necessary. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations offered for consideration. Traffic Volume Comparison Intersection turning movement counts were collected along Audubon Road at MN Highway 5, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road between Thursday, August 25 and Sunday, August 28, 2016. However concerns were expressed that these volumes were collected prior to area schools being in session. Therefore, supplemental traffic and pedestrian counts were collected at the following locations along Audubon Road between Tuesday, October 12 and Sunday October 16, 2016 to understand potential school and preliminary Museum opening impacts. • MN Highway 5 * • Paisley Park North Access • Paisley Park South Access/McGlynn Road • Park Road * • Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane • Lyman Boulevard Intersections with an asterisk represent a location collected as part of both the original and supplemental studies. In addition to the intersection counts, daily traffic volumes were continuously collected along Audubon Road at two locations (.e. North of Surridge Court and North of Coulter Drive) between Tuesday October 12 and Sunday October 16. These locations are consistent with previously collected average daily traffic volume locations provided by MnDOT. ONE CARLSON PARKWAY. SUrrE 150 1 MD NEApGI.ts, MN 55447 1 763.475.0010 1 W W W.SRFCONSULnNG.cont Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen October 19, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours, as well as daily traffic volumes were reviewed for comparison purposes, which are illustrated in Figure 1 and described below. 1) Weekday non -Museum event p.m. peak hour volumes from October at the Audubon Road intersections with MN Highway 5 and Park Road are approximately three (3) to eight (8) percent higher as compared to the August volumes collected. In general, the intersection travel patterns and magnitude are consistent between the two timeframes. The October weekday p.m. peak hour volumes were carried forward through the supplemental analysis. 2) Saturday midday peak hour volumes from October at the Audubon Road intersections with MN Highway 5 and Park Road are approximately ten (10) to 30 percent higher as compared to the August volumes collected. However, the difference is likely due to the Saturday Museum event. It should be noted that the Saturday midday peak hour volumes at these two locations are between 20 and 45 percent less than the weekday non -Museum p.m. peak hour conditions. 3) Pedestrian volumes collected during both August and October indicated limited activity during the weekday p.m. peak hour condition but an increase during Saturday midday conditions. 4) Daily traffic volumes collected along Audubon Road (shown in Chart 1) under a school, non - Museum event condition (Wednesday, October 12) are within +/- five (5) percent of previously collected data provided by MnDOT. This is generally within the typical daily volume variation of most roadways. a. Daily traffic volumes on Thursday and Friday, when Museum events took place, are approximately five (5) percent higher than the Wednesday data. This represents a daily traffic volume increase of approximately 160 to 230 vehicles per day (vpd). b. Daily traffic volumes on Saturday and Sunday were less than the data collected between Wednesday and Friday by approximately 1,500 to 2,500 vpd. Chart 1 Dalry Traffic Volume Comparison Page 2 Audubon Road Daily Traffic Volumes 5000 4364 4592 4478 MnDOT ADT...4:400 4500 ........................ ................. .......................................................... ...... 4000 3462 3611 3640 3500Mn .......... 3059._ DOT ADT -3,300 3000 ........... .....__ ............................................................. ............ j 2500 2110 2145 of Coulter Drive p■North 2000 1504 Q 1500 E North of Sunridge Court 1500 00' 10/12/2016 10/13/2016 10/14/2016 10/15/2016 10/16/2016 Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Page 2 N � r t-30 (45) +15 4---1529(1594)+65 r60 (76) -4 w a +1 (4) 3 } I +11 (967) 976 +10 (41) 31 N N fi2 N N C1 ` + o a H 0(0)0 + N S2 N w m v13 (11) -2 4 4 4-911(903)-8 {r 74 (124)+50 1c +,w (16) 3--+ I 1 ♦o +'W(1087)1053--* e mo +15 (50) 35--;1, v � o w t i + 0(49)+49 _ WExisting Traffic Volume Comparison Consulting Group. IM 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Figure 1 00169371 City of Chanhassen October 2016 0(2)+2 + + i 0 71 (72)+1 39(44)+5 25 (22) -3 11(11) 0 N fJ iarA RON IN j t* pto, Fm S N t i y H 1 (0) ' _ +... H 1 (10)+9 LEGEND _ XX - August 2016 Peak Hour Volume (XX) - October 2016 Peak Hour Volume - Difference in Counts - August Average Daily Traffic Volume ®X,)= - October Average Daily Traffic Volume - Side -Street Stop Control - Signal Control WExisting Traffic Volume Comparison Consulting Group. IM 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Figure 1 00169371 City of Chanhassen October 2016 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Intersection Capacity Comparison October 19, 2016 Based on the updated traffic data collected, a detailed intersection capacity analysis was completed for multiple scenarios under weekday p.m. peak hour conditions. Saturday midday conditions were not evaluated further since traffic volumes along both MN Highway 5 and Audubon Road are lower than the weekday p.m. peak hour condition, as noted earlier. The scenarios evaluated include existing conditions (October 2016, no Museum event) and three Museum event conditions (2,300 guests per day with Bus Only, and 2,000 and 4,700 guests per day with no busing). It should be noted that the 4,700 guests per day (65 guests per 10 -minute tour) was a previous assumption and only included for reference. Based on discussion with Paisley Park Management, the peak days are expected to have approximately 1,500 to 2,000 guests per day, with tours starting between 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. For analysis purposes, the 2,000 guests per day value was used to provide a conservative review, which equates to approximately 165 guests per hour or the equivalent of 150 vehicular trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour (75 entering and 75 exiting). This assumes an average 2.5 person per car vehicle occupancy and accounts for other services and employees. It should be noted that during the Museum (Bus Only) event that had approximately 2,300 guests on Friday, October 14, 2016, approximately eight (8) buses were observed entering/existing the site during the weekday p.m. peak hour. A general Wile of thumb is that a single bus operates in a similar manner as the equivalent of two to three passenger vehicles from a roadway capacity perspective. Results of the intersection capacity analysis comparison, shown in Table 1, indicates that all study intersections operate or are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service under the scenarios identified. Note that overall LOS A through D is generally considered acceptable within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. All queues are expected to be maintained within the existing tum lane storage. The maximum southbound queues along Audubon Road at the Paisley Park South Access is expected to be 50 feet (.e. two or three vehicles) under the 2,000 guest car -only scenario. A summary of the "2,300 guest bus only" and "2,000 guest car only" Museum event scenario volumes is shown in Figure 2. Table i Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Comparison Audubon Road Intersection Scenario Level of Service (Delay) Existing PP Event PP Event (Oct 2016) (2.3K Guests) (2K Guests) No PP Event Bus Only Car Only PP Event (4.7K Guests) Car Only MN Highway 5 B (17 sec.) B (19 sec.) B (19 sec.) C (25 sec.) Paisley Park North Access (1) A/B (10 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) Paisley Park South Access/McGlynn Road (1) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (13 sec.) A/B (14 sec.) A/C (18 sec.) Coulter Boulevard (1) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) AIB (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) Park Road (1) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane (1) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) Lyman Boulevard (11 A/C (16 sec.) A/C (17 sec.) A/C (17 sec.) A/C (18 sec.) (1) Indicates an unsignalved intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Page 4 WON I Museum Event Conditions Figure 2 Co.,WG—V In, 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement 00169371 City of Chanhassen October 2016 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen October 19, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Audubon Road (South of Park Road) Impacts During the weekday Museum event days observed (Thursday, October 13 and Friday, October 14), traffic volumes along Audubon Road north of Sunridge Court were approximately 130 to 160 daily vehicles higher than the 3,482 vehicles collected on Wednesday, October 12. Given that the Museum had required busing for the majority of the guests (excluding media, employees, and handicapped guests), the change in traffic volume is likely due to daily variation in traffic volumes, although some of the increase could be attributed to the Museum. If the Museum allowed a total of 2,000 guests per day along with the associated number of employees to serve the guests, the Museum would generate a total of approximately 1,700 to 1,800 vpd. Assuming approximately 15 percent of these guests may arrive via Audubon Road (from the South), which is consistent with the original study, the increase along Audubon Road would be approximately 250 to 275 vpd. This equates to approximately a 7.5 percent increase in volumes along Audubon Road (near SunRidge Court), which is relatively similar to the five (5) percent daily traffic volume variation observed and within the capacity of the roadway. Other Considerations Based on observations during the first few Museum events, the following items should be considered that were not previously discussed: 1) Continue to utilize the Powers Boulevard, Park Road, and Audubon Road route for entering buses (when needed), as well as the existing Paisley Park North Access. This provides the most efficient operations as well as provides the best maneuverability for buses within the site. a. Buses should continue to exit the Paisley Park North Access and continue north along Audubon Road to MN Highway 5. 2) Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to "Bus Only" and "Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. a. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. 3) Monitor parking to ensure the existing 120 parking spaces can meet the demand for the site and refine the allowed amount guests per hour to ensure adequate parking is provided. a. Given the anticipated peak guests under the car only scenario (2,000 guests per day/ 165 guests per hour), the existing 120 parking spaces may be sufficient to meet this demand, depending on the number of employees and average guest length of stay. This may limit the need to expand parking on site beyond current conditions. 4) Delay the parking lot expansion until the number of Museum guests arriving by car wasants such expansion. 5) There was minimal pedestrian activity observed at the Audubon Road and Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane intersection during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Therefore, no additional pedestrian enhancements are recommended at this time. H:\Pnjah\09000\9371\TS\R*PA9371_D,99 7901AwdviwwRmd Tiaffx_Ps�*i�S'GJj_Swpf4�r/ 161019.4a Page 6 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone 952.227.1100 Fax, 952.2271110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227.1180 Fax: 952.2271190 Engineering Phone: 952.2271160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone 952.227.1140 Fax 95222711'0 Park & Recreation Phone 952227.1120 Fax: 95222711'0 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952221.1400 Fax 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone 95222T1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone 952.2271300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax 952.2271110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us October 25, 2016 Small World Learning Center 1621 McGlynn Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: No Parking on McGlynn Road At the October 24, 2016 City Council meeting, the Council passed a No Parking Resolution for McGlynn Road. The City's Streets Department will be installing No Parking Signs on McGlynn Road this week. This change is due to the Paisley Park Museum. If the Learning Center will be hosting special events and needs on street parking, you may contact the Public Works Department at (952) 227-1301 and they will send a crew out to cover the signs for such events. If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-227-1169 or yoehmeQ,,ci. chanhassen. marl Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN Paul Oehme, PE Dir, of Public Works/City Engineer c: Campbell Properties LP I1 Charlie Burke, Streets Superintendent gkng\pauNenasuro parking mcglynn rd docx Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Aanenson, Kate From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:20 PM To: 'Melanie Mertes' Subject: RE: Paisley Park Concerns Melanie, See the responses below. I worked with Assistant City Engineer Alyson Fauske to answer your questions. Kate From: Melanie Mertes [mailto:melaniemertes@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 10:22 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Re: Paisley Park Concerns Hi Kate, I have a few follow-up questions from the Planning Meeting I attended earlier this week. Please let me know who is the best person in which to direct the questions. Traffic Study: At the meeting, the representative from Paisley Park/Graceland said only persons with VIP tickets would be directed to park on site. All other ticket holders would be directed to a SW Parking facility to be bussed to the tour. • Do we know which SW Station location? No • The one by the Chanhassen Dinner Theater or the one on 101 and Hwy. 212? • Is this for all tours or just for'high-volume' days? It is our understanding the buses will be used on any days that they exceed parking available onsite. • What constitutes high-volume? It is our understanding the buses will be used on any days that they exceed parking available on site. • Or is it just for high-volume hours? It is our understanding the buses will be used on any days that they exceed parking available on site. If this is true, especially for the location by the theater, this is bringing a lot of new traffic to our downtown area and shouldn't the traffic study have included that area (Specifically Market Blvd. by Walgreens/Cub Foods)? The traffic impact associated with the two ramps was included in the design for each ramp assuming maximum capacity. Business Plan from Paisley Park/Graceland: The representative said may things addressing the concerns of traffic, traffic patterns, working with Google Maps and pedestrian safety. Before approval, is there going to be any requirement from the city to put completion dates to these tasks? Right now it is not a requirement , but the applicant has stated they will work on the google issue. The 5 highest attendance days are coming up in the next 30 days. Any other business looking to come to Chanhassen would be held to higher standards and restrictions. The Paisley Park Museum should be no different. A details traffic study was required and they will be following the recommendations of the study including the internal connections of the parking lots and the striping of Audubon. The city is taking an escrow for financial security that these improvements are made. As well as improvements in the future. The statement that people are no longer going to drive directly to Paisley Park to just look and take photos because now they will buy tour tickets, in my opinion, is not valid. What is the city preparing to do during the Ryder Cup and the weekend of the tribute concert to ensure the safety and handle overloaded traffic in the area? Is this an additional cost to the taxpayers? The Ryder cup will be over before the museum opens. The operators of the museum are contacting separately at their expense for traffic control assistance. Final question: I was under the impression the meeting was designed for discussion and any final decisions would be made after everyone had been heard. However, for both the pool topic and Paisley Park, slides with the final decision had already been prepared. I look forward to your response on this question. The Commission recommended approved but also added four additional conditions for the City Council to consider. A updated staff report will go to the city council. You can get a copy of this report at the city's web site when it is available next week As a resident, I am not opposed to the Paisley Park Museum, however, it feels as if the city is putting safety and traffic concerns aside by pushing this through without a thoughtful process. I would appreciate it if you could forward this on to the planning committee members. Regards, Melanie Mertes On Sep 20, 2016, at 9:21 AM, "Aanenson, Kate" <kaanenson(i�ci.chanhassen.mn.us> wrote: Melanie, I will share your email with the Planning Commission and the City Council. Kate Sent from my Wad On Sep 20, 2016, at 9:01 AM, Melanie Mertes <melaniemertes(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi Kate, Thank you for your letter addressing concerns regarding the Paisley Park project. I am a resident that is deeply concerned on the impact such a tourist attraction is going to have on our daily lives in Chanhassen. As a resident, I do not see the museum having a positive impact - it is not a place to dine, not a place to spend time with family or the community, not a retail business. The only impact the museum is going to bring to Chanhassen is through -traffic.... through our neighborhoods, through our school intersections, through our already busy Highway 5. I am hoping to attend the meeting tonight - I am assuming it is at City Hall? I've attached a document that outlines my concerns. Regards, Melanie Mertes <Paisley Park Impacts.docx> PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM BUSINESS PLAN August 19, 2016 Bremer Trust, National Association, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate a museum at Paisley Park, 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen, MN, the former recording studio of Prince Rogers Nelson. The family of Prince is supportive of operating Paisley Park as a museum and believes that this is what Prince would have wanted for all of his fans. Paisley Park Facility has entered into an Exhibition Operating Agreement, with PP Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Graceland Holdings, LLC to operate the Exhibition. The management team of Graceland Holdings, LLC has been involved in the operations of Graceland in Memphis, Tennessee since 1982. Graceland has over 30 years.of eiperience, having handled in excess of 20 million visitors and 8 million vehicles during that time, including all aspects related to traffic and attendance management, ticket control, security, retail and food and beverage service as part of Graceland and operating a similar museum facility and tours. Graceland's experienced management team will be providing development, management, and oversight of all aspects of the museum at Paisley Park. In recent years, Graceland has over 600,000 guests per year, while maintaining an amicable relationship with the City of Memphis and neighbors of Graceland. Graceland is in the process of expanding its operations to include operation of a hotel complex a few blocks from the Graceland mansion which is scheduled to open in October 2016 and also opening up a World's Fair entertainment complex across the street from the Graceland mansion which is scheduled to be open in March 2017. Graceland Holdings is highly committed to this Project and making it success for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson as well as the local and broader Twin Cities community. Toward that end Graceland is providing the initial funds for capital improvement and initial operating costs of the museum. The following is the proposed business plan for the Paisley Park museum operations: Building Construction — We do not anticipate any exterior construction at the site, other than items related to the parking lot. In terms of interior construction, we anticipate widening doorways, adding lighting, motion detectors, and sound systems in areas of the facility. We will also be completing various improvements required for fire safety purposes. As previously reviewed with the City of Chanhassen, we will also be replacing the existing chiller/boiler at the facility. - Q12erations — We plan to open the Museum in early October (subject to obtaining all approvals required by the City of Chanhassen). The family of Prince Rogers Nelson has an Official Family Tribute Concert scheduled for Thursday, October 13a' at U.S. Bank Stadium, and the plan is to have the Museum open in advance of that so that out of town visitors and others that attend the Tribute Concert will also be able to complete a tour of Paisley Park. We anticipate operating the Museum from 10 am to 10 pm during the week and from 9 am to midnight on weekends, although we will vary these hours based on ticket demands and may have less hours urmg week or in winter months. At this time, it is difficult for us to predict peak hours, but we anticipate heavier traffic in evenings and weekends. 128637840.2 Tickets to the Museum will be sold only online and will not be able to be purchased at the site. We will not permit any walls -up entry. Tickets will be for a specific time tour and guests will be permitted to park and enter Paisley Park only 20-30 minutes early. This time frame and limited access will be strongly emphasized in ticketing and repeated messaging to guests. The length of the tour will be approximately 70 minutes and guests will be required to exit within 30-45 minutes after the conclusion of their tour. The maximum guest stay during peak times will be 2 hours. Tours will be guided tours and will start in 10 minute increments and each tour is expected to include 25-30 guests. We anticipate a total of 1500 to 2000 guests per day on peak days. Ticket prices will be $38.50 for standard tickets. A VIP Tour experience will also be offered for smaller guests groups with prices of $100 or more. Guided tours will take guests through the recording and mixing studios, video editing rooms, rehearsal rooms, Prince's private NPG Music Club, and the soundstage and performance hall. The tour will be contained to the main floor of the facility and will be indoors, except for an exit from the performance hall to the storage garage where cars and the tour bus will be able to be viewed. We will add a tent to the breezeway passage from the performance hall to the storage garage. We anticipate employing 20 to 60 people from the local area during the museum's operating hours. This amount will vary based on the tour volumes and times. We will also be engaging a substantial number of local contractors and service providers to ready the facility for operations by early October. 80 Traffic/Parking — The facility currently includes approximatelarking spaces in its front parking area. We plan to further expand the parking area to th to add an additional 40-50 spots. In addition, because we will be utilizing parking attendants we would anticipate being able to "double-park" cars based on knowing what times people will be exiting the facility and can utilize an additional 28-30 spots based on this method of parking. This will result in total parking of approximatelf-MU—sp-�. Based on Graceland's experience, we estimate that there will be 2.5 guests per ve e, which based on the anticipated attendance and tour times equals 60 vehicles per hour and a maximum of 150 vehicles parked at any given time given the ticketed tour windows and a maximum guest stay of 2.0 hours in peak time periods. As noted below, we also anticipate as many as 20% of guests being shuttled from other locations particularly during peak hours. We will expand the front gate area to include a coned cul-de-sac area so that cars can easily exit from Audubon Road. We will have parking attendants that will immediately review parking tickets and time windows to confirm if a vehicle can enter the parking lot. If a guest's allotted time period has not yet arrived, the attendant will direct the car to exit the cul-de-sac and return during the ticketed time period. The attendants will also be patrolling the exterior fence and Audubon Road to prevent any cars from stopping along the road or otherwise causing traffic congestion. We will have parking attendants that will direct parking. We will be adding lighting to the parking lot to the extent there is not sufficient lighting currently there. In the future, we may utilize land across Audubon Road for additional parking. 2 1286378402 A traffic study related to the facility is being prepared and will be submitted to the Planning Commission. On our current estimates, the traffic volumes will be less than the volume of cars entering the nearby General Mills facility based on observed traffic study there. We expect to utilize the back parking lot and garage for employees of the facility to park and will also utilize off-site shuttle and parking for employees. te are also making arrangements with bus companies to conduct shuttle trips from the airport d/or the Mall of America area. Security — The Museum will have 240 security. We will install a new security system. The Museum will hire security guards and supervisors for its operations. Food & Drink — The Museum will offer food and beverage at the conclusion of the tour. There will be no alcoholic beverages sold or permitted to be consumed at the facility. The food is anticipated to be a limited item of vegetarian items including a tasting plate, dessert, and select sandwiches. We are interviewing vendors to provide the food and anticipate that while some food would be prepared offsite and delivered daily that there would be select portions of the menu that would be prepared on site. The Museum anticipates erecting a tent connected (or semi -attached) to the exit near the restrooms in a portion of the exterior parking area where guests could sit for a brief period to eat upon conclusion of the tour. (See attached exterior map). There will be no smoking permitted at the facility. Merchandise — The Museum will include sales of merchandise on-site including apparel, guidebooks and other souvenirs. Other Events — Paisley Park will continue to be utilized as a recording studio for special sessions. In addition, we anticipate that concerts will also continue to be held in the performance hall. There would be no events outside. No events are anticipated to be held until at least March 2017 and no arrangements or bookings have been made related to future events. We anticipate that such events will be held on Friday or Saturday weekend and that offsite parking arrangements will be made. Based on square footage of the performance hall the attendees at events could be up to 1500 people at one time Studio and concert usage of the facility will be limited in order to avoid interfering with tour attendance. I Kct Future Activities — While future plans have not been developed, some of the additional potential uses or ancillary operations for Paisley Park include additional parking and potential development and completion of the exterior round building. We may also develop onsite limited occupancy lodging in the future. 128637840.2 See Attached Facility Map 128637840.2 entrance expansion proposed tent F proposed lot extension L o� NJ Parking Lot Circulation 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Consulting Group, Inc. Q4 of Chanhassen 00169411 September 2016 Aanenson, Kate From: Phelps, Todd <Todd.Phelps@stinson.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 7:45 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: RE: paisley Thanks, Kate. We'll reach out to Brian today regarding the striping. To follow up on our conversation yesterday, here's where I think things stand: 1. $25,000 Escrow. The $25,000 cash escrow or LOC may come from either the operator or the property owner. It just needs to be posted when the Site Improvement Agreement is executed. 2. Bus Plan. The City would like a copy of the written busing plan with SW Transit. Any economic terms may be redacted. 3. Carver County Sheriffs Department—Traffic Control. The operator will contact the Carver County Sheriff's Department and arrange for their assistance in controlling traffic for opening day and the other high volume days that have been identified (Oct. 8,14,and 15). 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement. a. The "Developer" should be "Paisley Park Facility, LLC". b. ' Sec. 2.a. Re -striping Audubon Road by Oct. 5, 2016. The operator will contact Brian at AAA Striping today to re -stripe Audubon and the parking lot. c. Sec. 2.d. Relocating northern access. We agreed to condition this requirement on the results of the traffic/pedestrian study required in Sec. 2.f. In other words, if in the traffic/pedestrian study that has to completed within one year of opening, the traffic engineer recommends relocating the northern access point, then the City will require that the northern access point be relocated, subject to RPBCWD I!/ approval. d. Sec. 2.e. Installing Sidewalks within the Site. Again, we agreed to condition this requirement on the results of the traffic/pedestrian study required in Sec. 2.f. In other words, if in the traffic/pedestrian study that has to completed within one year of opening, the traffic engineer recommends installing sidewalks within the site (i.e. between the northern parking lot and the southern parking lot), then the City will require that sidewalks be installed, subject to RPBCWD approval. e. Sec. 2,f. Traffic/Pedestrian Study. You were going to discuss this with the City Engineer and then revise it. The City's intent is not to force the property owner or operator to spend an undetermined amount of money to improve the system. However, if there are still pedestrian -vehicle conflicts on Audubon that are being caused by Paisley Park, then the City wants to the ability to require the property gown /operator to install and pay for improvements at the Audubon/McGlynn intersection, i.e. cross- vaa with flashing lights, etc. 5. PUD Ordinance. a. Sec. 2.b. Permitted Uses. The City had deleted "Permitted uses in the IOP Zoning District" as permitted uses because of a concern over some of the uses in that zoning district. We discussed including "office". After reviewing the permitted uses in the IOP district, please consider including "offices, conference center and warehouse" back in. b. Sec. 2.e.4. Bus Route and Schedule Approval. You agreed to delete the requirement that buses entering the site must be in accordance with routes and schedules approved by the City Engineer. C. Sec. 2.f.4.b. RPBCWD Permits. The requirement to obtain permits from the Watershed District is qualified by "all required permits". So if a permit is not required by the Watershed District, then the condition has been satisfied. d. Sec. 2.f.4.c. Sidewalks. You agreed to delete the requirement that sidewalks be installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance until/unless the north parking lot is expanded. I'm going to be out of the office much of today but can be reached on my cell phone if something comes up. 612-251- 1049. Thanks! Todd Todd M. Phelps I Partner I Stinson Leonard Street LLP 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55402 T: 612.335.18711 M: 612.251.1049 1 F: 612.335.1657 todd.phelps@stinson.com I www.stinson.com Legal Administrative Assistant: Joleen Longbehn 1612.335.1989 1 joleen.longbehn@stinson.com This communication (including any attachments) is from a law firm and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please contact the sender for instructions concerning return or destruction, and do not use or disclose the contents to others. From: Aanenson, Kate[mailto:kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 5:22 AM To: Phelps, Todd Subject: Fwd: paisley Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Oehme, Paul" <poehmeCdci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: September 27, 2016 at 8:48:21 PM CDT To: "Aanenson, Kate"<kaanensonCdci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: paisley AAA Striping - Brian (763) 428-4322 Is who we used this year for striping. Paul Aanenson, Kate From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 12:32 PM To: 'Phelps, Todd' Subject: RE: paisley Todd, Thanks for email with updates I have added comments to each of your issues. Call if you have questions. Kate Kathryn Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 952-227-1139 "Planning for Today, Providing for Tommorrow" From: Phelps, Todd[mailto:Todd.Phelps@stinson.comj Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 7:45 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: RE: paisley Thanks, Kate. We'll reach out to Brian today regarding the striping. To follow up on our conversation yesterday, here's where I think things stand: 1. $25.000 Escrow. The $25,000 cash escrow or LOC may come from either the operator or the property owner. It just needs to be posted when the Site Improvement Agreement is executed. This needs be posted / secured, immediately to ensure it is completed. Still need the mailing address of the developer. 2. Bus Plan. The City would like a copy of the written busing plan with SW Transit. Any economic terms may be redacted. ok 3. Carver County Sheriffs Department—Traffic Control. The operator will contact the Carver County Sheriffs Department and arrange for their assistance in controlling traffic for opening day and the other high volume days that have been identified (Oct. 8,14,and 15). ok Site Improvement Performance Agreement. a. The "Developer" should be "Paisley Park Facility, LLC". Ok b. Sec. 2.a. Re -striping Audubon Road by Oct. 5. 2016. The operator will contact Brian at AAA Striping today to re -stripe Audubon and the parking lot. ok c. Sec. 2.d. Relocating northern access. We agreed to condition this requirement on the results of the traffic/pedestrian study required in Sec. 2.f. In other words, if in the traffic/pedestrian study that has to completed within one year of opening, the traffic engineer recommends relocating the northern access point, then the City will require that the northern access point be relocated, subject to RPBCWD approval. d. Sec. 2.e. Installing Sidewalks within the Site. Again, we agreed to condition this requirement on the results of the traffic/pedestrian study required in Sec. 2.f. In other words, if in the traffic/pedestrian study that has to completed within one year of opening, the traffic engineer recommends installing sidewalks within the site (i.e. between the northern parking lot and the southern parking lot), then the City will require that sidewalks be installed, subject to RPBCWD approval. e. Sec. 2.f. Traffic/Pedestrian Study. You were going to discuss this with the City Engineer and then revise it. The City's intent is not to force the property owner or operator to spend an undetermined amount of money to improve the system. However, if there are still pedestrian -vehicle conflicts on Audubon that are being caused by Paisley Park, then the City wants to the ability to require the property owner/operator to install and pay for improvements at the Audubon/McGlynn intersection, i.e. cross- walk with flashing lights, etc. The engineering department wants required improvements 3. d. e. & f to remain as written. 5. PUD Ordinance. a. Sec. 2.b. Permitted Uses. The City had deleted "Permitted uses in the IOP Zoning District" as permitted uses because of a concern over some of the uses in that zoning district. We discussed including "office". After reviewing the permitted uses in the IOP district, please consider including " offices, conference center and warehouse" back in. ok b. Sec. 2.e.4. Bus Route and Schedule Approval. You agreed to delete the requirement that buses entering the site must be in accordance with routes and schedules approved by the City Engineer. ok C. Sec. 2.f.4.b. RPBCWD Permits. The requirement to obtain permits from the Watershed District is qualified by "all required permits". So if a permit is not required by the Watershed District, then the condition has been satisfied. It sill applies to future improvements agreed it has been meet for the drive connection under construction. d. Sec. 2.f.4.c. Sidewalks. You agreed to delete the requirement that sidewalks be installed to accommodate foot traffic from the parking lot to the building entrance until/unless the north parking lot is expanded. ok I'm going to be out of the office much of today but can be reached on my cell phone if something comes up. 612-251- 1049. Thanks! Todd Todd M. Phelps I Partner I Stinson Leonard Street LLP 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55402 T: 612.335.18711 M: 612.251.1049 1 F: 612.335.1657 todd.phelps@stinson.com I www.stinson.com Legal Administrative Assistant: Joleen Longbehn 1612.335.1989 ioleen.lonabehn@stinson.com This communication (including any attachments) is from a law firm and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please contact the sender for instructions concerning return or destruction, and do not use or disclose the contents to others. From: Aanenson, Kate [mailto:kaanenson(cbci.chanhassen.mn.usj Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 5:22 AM To: Phelps, Todd Subject: Fwd: paisley Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Oehme, Paul" <poehme@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: September 27, 2016 at 8:48:21 PM CDT To: "Aanenson, Kate" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: paisley AAA Striping - Brian (763) 428-4322 Is who we used this year for striping. Paul From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 4:40 PM To: Oehme, Paul <poehme ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: paisley Paul, Can you please send me contactors for striping the parking lot and Audubon Road. Kate Kathryn Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 952-227-1139 "Planning for Today, Providing for Tommorrow" Minimum requirements to certify museum space only as A-3 Occupancy (an interim accommodation). Defined area of occupancy (A-3, museum). Verification of adequate fire suppression system. 1 p Fire alarm system (voice notification if occupants exceed 999) Verification of exiting (panic hardware for spaces with an occupant load of 49 or more). ! U��L Verification of exit signs and emergency lighting. Fire safety and evacuation plan. Occupant load signage. Verification of ventilation for proposed occupancy. SAC (sewer availability charge) determination (M.O.U. as interim alternative). Adequate restroom facilities (OK for museum portion, verify for other uses). Accessible nparking �(original plan shows 100 spaces with 4 accessible — still acceptable). -ACX UV g/C/�` Other items as discovered during meeting. r September 26, 2016 Honorable Denny Laufenburger and Chanhassen Citv Council Members 7700 Market Boulevard Post Office Boa 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: VIA US MAIL AND EMAIL council aC�,ci.chanhassen.mn.us dlaufenburger(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us Paisley Park Museum Proposal Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: On September 20, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended that the Chanhassen City Council approve the request for rezoning submitted on behalf of Paisley Park in order for the facility to be operated as a museum. Mr. Nelson loved his home and workspace — as well as Chanhassen as a whole — and because of this, his fans feel a connection to your community. Mr. Nelson's fan base has always held Paisley Park in high esteem, as his dreams of it, and for it, came into focus shortly after ground was fust broken at 7801 Audubon Road. We have great respect for Chanhassen and are grateful to your citizens for welcoming Mr. Nelson — and us, his fans — with open arms. Therefore, it is with great enthusiasm that we welcome the idea of the Paisley Park Museum but one suggestion included in the proposal stands out to us in a less than positive way: the idea of significant changes to the fence surrounding the site. Recognizing that the idea behind changing the fence is due to high pedestrian volume, we submit that, with the exception of peak days, the largest overall influx of foot traffic has already occurred. Access to the grounds and interior spaces should result in the natural reduction of foot traffic in the area An eight -foot opaque fence/wall would be aesthetically unpleasant and would detract from the otherwise welcoming atmosphere that permeates Paisley Park Furthermore, in the absence of a gravesite, placing items on or near the fence is the only way Mr. Nelson's fans currently have to pay their respects to the artist we hold so dear. We understand that public safety must supersede our grieving process but we believe that over time, the need to express our grief in this way will likely diminish somewhat. For the short term the proposed changes with regard to traffic and access should serve to adequately protect the public. In short, we respectfully request that final approval be given to the museum project but that any changes to the fence surrounding the property, now or in the future, be denied. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. mcer fell Kan Rodman Co -Administrator Enc. cc Bremer Trust Chanhassen villager Minneapolis Star Tribune P O Box 823 Bloomington, IN 47402 purpleoutcrv@gmaii.com 7Hf OV741 MUNI 7urple OutCry is a global network of Prince Friends and supporters which, as a group, was launched via Facebook on June io, 201G. The Purple Outcry members are Prince supporters from all over the world; and we have united, and continue to unify, for one common goal: the vigorous protection and responsible sustenance of the wealth of art created by Prince Rogers Nelson; i.e., his recordings, writings, musical vault, and of Paisley Park, Prince's beloved residence and workspace. It is our mission, and one to which we are passionately committed, that none of Prince's work be in any way altered or manipulated with no mindfulness of the significance of Prince's contribution to modern culture. Since Prince's untimely passing on April 21, 2016, it appears that there is very little consideration being given to Prince's wishes for the future of his musical legacy, and absolutely no consideration given to the wishes of those touched and affected so profoundly by the Maestro's work; namely, his Friends, as Prince chose to refer to those commonly known as "fans." We, as a global community of Prince Friends, have allied together to fervently and vehemently insist that Prince's wishes, and the wishes of the people for whom his music and message had suck an impact, are not disregarded. Prince was arguably the finest musical virtuoso in history. His art obliterated all boundaries of race and faith and affected millions of people from all cultural and socioeconomic groups. His passing has devastated these millions, not only at the loss of the Maestro's music, but at the loss of the message of faith, peace, unity, and personal responsibility he so vocally embraced. In the interest of historical preservation, Prince's writings, recordings, musical vault, and residence and workspace must be protected From alteration, manipulation, and/or unseemly modification. The unaltered recordings of his music must be shielded in order to ensure that the Maestro's legacy is intact for future generations; the work of this great master must be protected for posterity. A popular internet meme muses, "If you ever feel sad, remember, the earth is billions of years old, and you got to live at the same time as Prince." This sentiment underlies Purple OutCry's mission. The art so prolifically and masterfully created by Prince Rogers Nelson, in the interest of history, and in the interest of truth, must at all costs be protected. Purple OutCry's goal, one to which we as a global community are passionately committed, is for the UNALTERED PRESERVATION of the work of this Musical Master. We ask for your support and assistance in ensuring that Prince's art, including the Paisley Park compound, lovingly created and owned by Prince, be protected from alteration or detrimental manipulation. It is our earnest desire, and, reportedly, Prince's as well, that Paisley Park become a museum of Prince's life and work, and that all recordings, writings, masters, and videos be protected from any form of alteration in order that the Maestro's work be readily available to all Future generations of his Friends, as it should be with the works of any Great Master. We thank you for your attention and support and welcome your input as we continue our mission to preserve for posterity the monumental legacy of the Maestro, Prince Rogers Nelson. Purple OutCry Administrators United for Prince Aanenson, Kate From: Petersen, Chelsea Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 3:47 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Messages Regarding Paisley Park 1) Female caller doesn't know why we even have to vote on the issue. Prince did a lot for the city and that's what he would have wanted, so it should just be allowed without a vote. It's not going to bring Chanhassen down and we need to be honoring Prince. Stated she was not a resident, no callback information left. Message left 10/1 or 10/2. 2) Female caller from Ohio complaining that'city' removed debris from fence. Quoting information from Facebook that items were thrown away. He made us and was our son, and removing the items was disrespectful. Items should have been put in boxes and not thrown away. We should allow people to put things back up. Message left 9/29 or 9/30. 3) Female caller from California wanted to file a complaint against Paisley Park as the fence items were removed without warning. City should have notified people that things were going to be removed so people could come pick them up before they were taken down. Message left 9/27 or 9/28. Chelsea Petersen Assistant City Manager City of Chanhassen 952-227-1118 �V CITY OF MEMORANDUM CI NNSEN TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 FROM- Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration DATE: October 3, 2016 Phone: 952.227.1100 SUBJ: Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.2271170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax:952.2271110 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax: 952.2271110 The applicant, Bremer Trust National Association, the Special Administrator of the Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate a Phone: 952.227.1400 museum at Paisley Park. They are requesting a rezoning to Planned Unit Fax: 952.227.1404 Development (PUD) to allow a museum as a permitted use in the zoning district. Planning & Natural Resources The staff is recommending the PUD rezoning for the following reasons: Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 • Provides for limitations on how the building can be used including hours of operation and traffic flow and parking. Public Works • Preserves the existing building. 7901 Park Place • Limited expansion preserves the existing trees. Phone: 952.227.1300 • Creates additional jobs. Fax: 952.227.1310 • Tourism generated supports the existing businesses. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1110 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 2016 to review the Website proposed rezoning. The Planning Commission voted six for and none against a motion www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us recommending approval of the rezoning request. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and PlanninglorTomorrow t Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 2 The Planning Commission requested that City Council consider the following: • Review the proposed transportation plan. • Consider bus routes only on Highway 5. • Require a Pedestrian Safety Plan. • Require a time frame for the completion of improvements. The September 20, 2016 Planning Commission minutes are attached to this staff report. Following is a summary of the changes to the application since the Planning Commission meeting: Offices were added as a permitted use. 2. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement has been added as a part for the PUD Ordinance. The applicant must submit a $25,000 escrow or letter of credit as a financial security to ensure the installation of the following improvements: a) Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left tum lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. b) Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. c) Install a paved connection between the northern and southern parking lots on the site by October 5, 2016. d) Relocate the northern access of the site 220 feet south of Highway 5 as shown in the September 15, 2016 SRF Traffic and Parking Study Option 1 by October 3, 2017. This elocated access shall be restricted to a right -out of the site. Sidewalks shall be installed within the site by October 3, 2017. f) A traffic study shall be completed within one year, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. 3. The PUD has been revised as follows specifying the development and regulations for the museum: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 3 e. Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated 9/15/2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -out only, relocating the Paisley Park north access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 3, 2016. i Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 4 TION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and Findings of Fact." ATTACHMENTS 1. PUD Ordinance. 2. Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 3. Findings of Fact. 4. SRF Traffic and Parking Study dated September 15, 2016. 5. Amended Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 20, 2016. 6. Planning Commission minutes dated September 20, 2016. 7. Emails. g:\plan\2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museum\executive summary.doc MEMORANDUM A2�,�- 6- 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN - Chanhassen is a Community for Life - ProvidingforToday and Planning forTomorrow TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director DATE: October 24, 2016 V '� ' ' SUBJ: Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, Findings of Fact and No Parking Resolution for McGlynn Drive." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At their October 10`9 meeting the City Council discussed the changes the changes that had been made to date. The City Council tabled action on his item until October 24`9. The City Council approved 12 special events permits. Torus will be conducted on October, 13,14,15,21, 22 & 23rd. The Council requested that updated traffic report be prepared as well as a report from the Sheriff's office on how the events were working. ANALYSIS From the operator's perspective, things ran smoothly on October 13, 14 and 15d. They stated that on average, there were 200 visitors per hour and between 2000-2400 people visiting the museum per day. The tour hours ran from 9 am to 9 pm. The parkinp(buses from Southwest Transit (SWT) seemed to work well too. The operator had two employees at SWT and Len Simich from SWT sent an email stating that from SWT's perspective, things were running smoothly. PH 952.227.1100 • WWW.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum – Planning Case 2016-24 October 24, 2016 Page 2 The newer route—left on Powers, right on Park, right on Audubon and entering (right only) and exiting (right only) out of the north gate worked well too. Attached is the SRF Draft Traffic Study dated October 19d'. The study has the following considerations: "Based on observations during the first few Museum events, the following items should be considered that were not previously discussed: 1) Continue to utilize the Powers Boulevard, Park Road, and Audubon Road route for entering buses (when needed), as well as the existing Paisley Park North Access. This provides the most efficient operations as well as provides the best maneuverability for buses within the site. a. Buses should continue to exit the Paisley Park North Access and continue north along Audubon Road to MN Highway 5. 2) Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to `Bus Only" and "Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. a. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. 3) Monitor parking to ensure the existing 120 parking spaces can meet the demand for the site and refine the allowed amount guests per hour to ensure adequate parking is provided. a. Given the anticipated peak guests under the car only scenario (2,000 guests per day/ 165 guests per hour), the existing 120 parking spaces maybe sufficient to meet this demand, depending on the number of employees and average guest length of stay. This may limit the need to expand parking on site beyond current conditions. 4) Delay the parking lot expansion until the number of Museum guests arriving by car wan -ants such expansion. 5) There was minimal pedestrian activity observed at the Audubon Road and Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane intersection during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Therefore, no additional pedestrian enhancements are recommended at this time." The Carver County Sheriff s Office observed the Vehicle and pedestrian patterns October 6-8 and 13-15. (see attached memo). Overall they public safety impact was minimal or non-existent, for instance, the first three days of operation resulting in only one minor medical call for a patron. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 24, 2016 Page 3 The applicant is requesting that 40 guest cars be permitted to park on site, not to exceed 40 guest cars per hour. This would be separate from employees or contractors. Buses would still be used in those times when guests would exceed the 40 -stall guest cars per hour maximum. This would be in place until the parking lot is expanded. Staff has modified the PUD Ordinance and Site Performance Agreement based on the recommendations received, as well as prepared the no Parking Resolution for McGlynn Drive. RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and Findings of Fact; and No Parking Resolution on McGlynn Drive." ATTACHMENTS 1. PUD Ordinance. 2. Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 3. Findings of Fact. 4. No Parking Resolution 5. SRF Traffic and Parking Study Supplement dated October 19, 2016. 6. Memo form Lieutenant Eric Kittelson 7. Executive Summary from October 10, 2016 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\plan\2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park muscum\2 MMUtive summary 10-24-16.dm AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City s zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, MN Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District shall apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted: 1. Museum. 2. Recording studio. 3. Hotel. 4. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than twenty percent (20%) of the floor space is used for retail sales. These sales may include food, beverages and memorabilia. 5. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan must be Sled with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each concert. 6. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each event. 7. Office. 8. Multiple buildings on a lot. C. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted uses. 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. d. Materials and Design Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. 1890870 e. Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -in and right -out only for buses; leeatiea. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 24, 2016. 5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses, junipers and barberry. E Parking 1. Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left tum lane into the southern access. 4. All required permits, including from the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. 5. The north access shall be limited to a right -in and right -out of the site for buses. 6. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the SRF study. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus. 2 1890870 9. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shall be by bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest cars. 10. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 241 day of October, 2016, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on 1890870 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT PAISLEY PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT dated October 24, 2016, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and Paisley Park Facility, LLC. BACKGROUND. A. The City has approved a rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park to Planned Unit Development ("PUD"). The PUD requires the Developer to enter in this Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 2. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall construct the following improvements by the dates indicated: A. Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left tum lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. B. Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to "Bus Only" and "Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. 1880550 .11 . _ Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to "Bus Only" and "Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. 1880550 a. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. A pork -chop island should be placed in the access to control the right-in/right-out. E. A traffic study shall be completed within one year, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. F. Landscaping shall be planted and maintained per the PUD. 3. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 4. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $25,000.00. S. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. B. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in wilting, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. D. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property and/or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded 1880550 interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. E. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. F. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. G. The Developer represents to the City that the development complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 6. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 7. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Paisley Park Facility, LLC, c/o Bremer Trust, National Association, 1100 West St. Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, PO Box147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317- 0147. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow] 1880550 CITY OF CHANHASSEN M (SEAL) AND: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Denny Laufenburger, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Denny Laufenburger and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 1880550 DEVELOPER: PAISLEY PARK FACILITY, LLC Z STATE OF ) (ss. COUNTY OF 1 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2016, by the of NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 AMP/cjh 1880550 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. _ Date: TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317-8363 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. , dated 2 , of (Name of Bank) 11 , b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2 This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen Finance Director, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317-8363, and is actually received by the Finance Director at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. M Its: 1880550 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA In Re: Application of PRN Music Corporation FINDINGS OF FACT for a Rezoning of Property legally described as AND DECISION Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Planning Case No. 2016-24 On October 24, 2016, the City Council met to consider the application of PRN Music Corporation to rezone property from IOP -Industrial Office Park to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The City Council of the City of Chanhassen hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and Decision in the above -captioned matter: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned IOP -Industrial Office Park. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial. 3. The description of the property is: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 4. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. 6. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. 7. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. 8. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 189252v1 9. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 10. The museum will create new jobs in the City and the tourism will support the existing business. 11. The Planning Report No. 2016-24, dated September 20, 2016, prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al, is incorporated herein. The City Council approves the rezoning to Planned Unit Development. Dated: October 24, 2016 CITY OF CHANHASSEN M Denny Laufenburger, Mayor AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 189252x1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: October 24, 2016 RESOLUTION NO: 2016 -XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING ZONE ON MCGLYNN DRIVE FROM AUDUBON ROAD TO CUL-DE-SAC WHEREAS, parking is currently allowed along McGlynn Drive; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to have a No Parking zone on McGlynn Drive in conjunction with the Paisley Park PUD and site plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council that a resolution approves establishing a No Parking zone on McGlynn Drive from Audubon Road to the cul-de-sac. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 24' day of October, 2016. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT ONOI ENGINEERS PLANNERS DESIGNERS Consulting Group, Inc. Draft Memorandum SRF.NTo. 0169371 To: Paul Oehme, PE Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Chanhassen From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Tom Sachi, EIT, Engineer Date: October 19, 2016 Subject: 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Introduction SRF completed the 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study, dated September 15, 2016 to identify traffic and parking issues associated with the proposed Paisley Park Museum as well as recommend potential improvements to address operations. However since completion of the original study, City staff requested additional traffic data within the area and the Museum has been open to the public. This data focuses on locations previously collected as part of the original study and new locations to the south along Audubon Road. Furthermore, discussions with Paisley Park representatives indicate that changes to the Museum business plan are expected, specifically a reduction in the daily number of tour guests. 'Therefore, the main objectives of this supplement are to compare the traffic data collected (after Museum opening), evaluate intersection operations based on potential business plan modifications, and identify changes to the previous recommendations, if necessary. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations offered for consideration. Traffic Volume Comparison Intersection turning movement counts were collected along Audubon Road at MN Highway 5, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road between Thursday, August 25 and Sunday, August 28, 2016. However concerns were expressed that these volumes were collected prior to area schools being in session. Therefore, supplemental traffic and pedestrian counts were collected at the following locations along Audubon Road between Tuesday, October 12 and Sunday October 16, 2016 to understand potential school and preliminary Museum opening impacts. • MN Highway 5 * • Paisley Park North Access • Paisley Park South Access/McGlynn Road • Park Road * • Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane • Lyman Boulevard Intersections with an asterisk represent a location collected as part of both the original and supplemental studies. In addition to the intersection counts, daily traffic volumes were continuously collected along Audubon Road at two locations (i.e. North of Surridge Court and North of Coulter Drive) between Tuesday October 12 and Sunday October 16. These locations are consistent with previously collected average daily traffic volume locations provided by MnDOT. ONE CARLSON PARKw.SY, SUITE 150 1 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 1763A75.0010 I wW W.SRFCONSULnNG.COM Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen October 19, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours, as well as daily traffic volumes were reviewed for comparison purposes, which are illustrated in Figure 1 and described below. 1) Weekday non -Museum event p.m. peak hour volumes from October at the Audubon Road intersections with MN Highway 5 and Park Road are approximately three (3) to eight (8) percent higher as compared to the August volumes collected. In general, the intersection travel patterns and magnitude are consistent between the two timeframes. The October weekday p.m. peak hour volumes were carried forward through the supplemental analysis. 2) Saturday midday peak hour volumes from October at the Audubon Road intersections with MN Highway 5 and Park Road are approximately ten (10) to 30 percent higher as compared to the August volumes collected. However, the difference is likely due to the Saturday Museum event. It should be noted that the Saturday midday peak hour volumes at these two locations are between 20 and 45 percent less than the weekday non -Museum p.m. peak hour conditions. 3) Pedestrian volumes collected during both August and October indicated limited activity during the weekday p.m. peak hour condition but an increase during Saturday midday conditions. 4) Daily traffic volumes collected along Audubon Road (shown in Chart 1) under a school, non - Museum event condition (Wednesday, October 12) are within +/- five (5) percent of previously collected data provided by MnDOT. This is generally within the typical daily volume variation of most roadways. a. Daily traffic volumes on Thursday and Friday, when Museum events took place, are approximately five (5) percent higher than the Wednesday data. This represents a daily traffic volume increase of approximately 160 to 230 vehicles per day (vpd). b. Daily traffic volumes on Saturday and Sunday were less than the data collected between Wednesday and Friday by approximately 1,500 to 2,500 vpd. Chart 1 Daily Traffic Volume Comparison Page 2 Audubon Road Daily Traffic Volumes 5000 436x 4592 4478 MnDOT ADT...4:400 4500 ........................ ................. ....... 4000 3482 3611 3640 v 3500 M nDOT ADT - 3,300 E 3000 j 2500 2110 2145 Q 2000 ■North of Coulter Drive Q 1500 1504 0 North of Sunridge Court 100500 ' 10/12/2016 10/13/2016 10/14/2016 10/15/2016 10/16/2016 Wednesday Thursday friday Saturday Sunday Page 2 Vv )�V U August 2016 Peak Hour Volume 0 H October 2016 Peak Hour Volume N � � Difference in Counts � N � •- N August Average Daily Traffic Volume VA October Average Daily Traffic Volume Q - Side -Street Stop Control N n L30 (46) +15 Signal Control t 1529 (1694)+65t Y 80 � 9„ (903) -8 Y 71 o (76) o N (124)+50 + o o o +1 (4) 31 YN 5 N o +13 (18) 3� v I ♦11 (987) 976 n m 1 +34 (1087) 1053 c +10 (41) 31 a +15 (50) 35 0 (0) 0 0 (49) +49 S x— (4,475) +75 •.•. o (z>+2 0 (1>+1 or aH H O r O 71(72)+1 39(44)+5 _ ^ `- 25(22)-3 11 (11) 0 N m m m s ^ m m � � m a V 1(0).l �. 1(10)+9 LEGEND XX - August 2016 Peak Hour Volume ()CK) - October 2016 Peak Hour Volume +/- - Difference in Counts X,J000 - August Average Daily Traffic Volume October Average Daily Traffic Volume Q - Side -Street Stop Control 19 - Signal Control Existing Traffic Volume Comparison ►� ■ Figure 1 F,.,,„,,, 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement 00169371 City of Chanhassen October 2016 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement Intersection Capacity Comparison October 19, 2016 Based on the updated traffic data collected, a detailed intersection capacity analysis was completed for multiple scenarios under weekday p.m. peak hour conditions. Saturday midday conditions were not evaluated further since traffic volumes along both MN Highway 5 and Audubon Road are lower than the weekday p.m. peak hour condition, as noted earlier. The scenarios evaluated include existing conditions (October 2016, no Museum event) and three Museum event conditions (2,300 guests per day with Bus Only, and 2,000 and 4,700 guests per day with no busing). It should be noted that the 4,700 guests per day (65 guests per 10 -minute tour) was a previous assumption and only included for reference. Based on discussion with Paisley Park Management, the peak days are expected to have approximately 1,500 to 2,000 guests per day, with tours starting between 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. For analysis purposes, the 2,000 guests per day value was used to provide a conservative review, which equates to approximately 165 guests per hour or the equivalent of 150 vehicular trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour (75 entering and 75 exiting). This assumes an average 2.5 person per car vehicle occupancy and accounts for other services and employees. It should be noted that during the Museum (Bus Only) event that had approximately 2,300 guests on Friday, October 14, 2016, approximately eight (8) buses were observed entering/existing the site during the weekday p.m. peak hour. A general rule of thumb is that a single bus operates in a similar manner as the equivalent of two to three passenger vehicles from a roadway capacity perspective. Results of the intersection capacity analysis comparison, shown in Table 1, indicates that all study intersections operate or are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service under the scenarios identified. Note that overall LOS A through D is generally considered acceptable within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. All queues are expected to be maintained within the existing turn lane storage. The maximum southbound queues along Audubon Road at the Paisley Park South Access is expected to be 50 feet (i.e. two or three vehicles) under the 2,000 guest car -only scenario. A summary of the "2,300 guest bus only" and "2,000 guest car only" Museum event scenario volumes is shown in Figure 2. Table 1 Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Comparison Audubon Road Intersection Scenario Level of Service (Delay) Existing PP Event PP Event (Oct 2016) (2.3K Guests) (2K Guests) No PP Event I Bus Only Car Only PP Event (4.71K Guests) Car Only MN Highway 5 B (17 sec.) B (19 sec.) B (19 sec.) C (25 sec.) Paisley Park North Access (1) A/B (10 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) Paisley Park South Access/McGlynn Road (1) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (13 sec.) A/B (14 sec.) A/C (18 sec.) Coulter Boulevard (1) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) Park Road (1) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) A/B (11 sec.) Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane (1) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) A/B (12 sec.) Lyman Boulevard (1) A/C (16 sec.) A/C (17 sec.) A/C (17 sec.) A/C (18 sec.) (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst sidestreet approach delay. Page 4 RION I Museum Event Conditions Figure 2 C�„lao.p a 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Parking Study Supplement 00169371 City of Chanhassen October 2016 Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen October 19, 2016 7801 Audubon Road Traffic and Puking Study Supplement Audubon Road (South of Park Road) Impacts During the weekday Museum event days observed ('Thursday, October 13 and Friday, October 14), traffic volumes along Audubon Road north of Sunridge Court were approximately 130 to 160 daily vehicles higher than the 3,482 vehicles collected on Wednesday, October 12. Given that the Museum had required busing for the majority of the guests (excluding media, employees, and handicapped guests), the change in traffic volume is likely due to daily variation in traffic volumes, although some of the increase could be attributed to the Museum. If the Museum allowed a total of 2,000 guests per day along with the associated number of employees to serve the guests, the Museum would generate a total of approximately 1,700 to 1,800 vpd. Assuming approximately 15 percent of these guests may arrive via Audubon Road (from the South), which is consistent with the original study, the increase along Audubon Road would be approximately 250 to 275 vpd. This equates to approximately a 7.5 percent increase in volumes along Audubon Road (near SunRidge Court), which is relatively similar to the five (5) percent daily traffic volume variation observed and within the capacity of the roadway. Other Considerations Based on observations during the first few Museum events, the following items should be considered that were not previously discussed: 1) Continue to utilize the Powers Boulevard, Park Road, and Audubon Road route for entering buses (when needed), as well as the existing Paisley Park North Access. This provides the most efficient operations as well as provides the best maneuverability for buses within the site. a. Buses should continue to exit the Paisley Park North Access and continue north along Audubon Road to MN Highway 5. 2) Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to "Bus Only" and "Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. a. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. 3) Monitor parking to ensure the existing 120 parking spaces can meet the demand for the site and refine the allowed amount guests per hour to ensure adequate parking is provided. a. Given the anticipated peak guests under the car only scenario (2,000 guests per day/ 165 guests per hour), the existing 120 parking spaces may be sufficient to meet this demand, depending on the number of employees and average guest length of stay. This may limit the need to expand parking on site beyond current conditions. 4) Delay the parking lot expansion until the number of Museum guests arriving by car warrants such expansion. 5) There was minimal pedestrian activity observed at the Audubon Road and Valley Ridge Trail North/Osprey Lane intersection during the weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours. Therefore, no additional pedestrian enhancements are recommended at this time. H.\Pr*W\09090\937/\TS\RO.A937/_Drvft 790IArdll.,R,ad Trrffi._PurkiRgtt�d�_Sx/y�lrwrN 1510/9Mn Page 6 Memo TO: Kate Aanenson, Chanhassen City Planner FROM: Lieutenant Eric Kittelson, Chanhassen Liaison DATE: October 18, 2016 RE. Paisley Park Zoning Carver County Sher'iff's Office staff observed vehicle and pedestrian patterns on October 6-8 and 13-15 from 0900-2100 hours on Audubon Road south of MN Highway 5 and north of Lake Drive West. The purpose of the qualitative analysis was to determine the impact of Paisley Park operations when operating under the special use permit. Vehicle and pedestrian impact to the surrounding area is negligible with a low amount of increased pedestrian traffic and vehicular traffic. This is under current operating standards with bussing of patrons to the venue. Obviously a change in this process would result in a different impact to the area. Deputies patrolled the area hourly during the weekdays and were on-site for twelve hour shifts on the weekend days (paid for by off-duty contract through Paisley Park). The process improved greatly from the first three days to the second three days already. Here are observations to consider moving forward: • Media was reminded on the first day of opening that they may not park on the sidewalk or boulevard on the west side of Audubon Road as this is no longer "breaking news". Once reminded they moved to McGlynn Road and we have had no further issues • VIP parking inside the property was allowed the first weekend. Parking on the second weekend was relegated to disabled and employee parking only. This had a positive impact on the scenario. • There were a number of people getting dropped off or picked up by private parties, Uber driver's and taxi drivers. The private parties were directed to the park and ride and some chose to park on McGlynn Road and thus created pedestrian traffic crossing Audubon Road. • The coach bus transporting the majority of patrons came and left approximately every 25 minutes and appeared to be'/. full most times. Overall, the public safety impact was minimal or non-existent. For instance, the first three days of operation resulted in only one minor medical call for a patron. Page 1 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director DATE: October 3, 2016 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 SUBJ: Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952227.1110 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recreation Center The applicant, Bremer Trust National Association, the Special Administrator of the 2310 Coulter Boulevard Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, has formed Paisley Park Facility, LLC to operate a Phone: 952.227.1400 museum at Paisley Park. They are requesting a rezoning to Planned Unit Fax: 952.2271404 Development (PUD) to allow a museum as a permitted use in the zoning district. Planning & The staff is recommending the PUD rezoning for the following reasons: Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 • Provides for limitations on how the building can be used including hours of operation and traffic flow and parking. Public Works • Preserves the existing building. 7901 Park Place • Limited expansion preserves the existing trees. Phone: 952.227.1300 . Creates additional jobs. Fax: 952.227.1310 e Tourism generated supports the existing businesses. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1110 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 2016 to review the Website proposed rezoning. The Planning Commission voted six for and none against a motion www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us recommending approval of the rezoning request. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing iorTodayand Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 2 The Planning Commission requested that City Council consider the following: • Review the proposed transportation plan. • Consider bus routes only on Highway 5. • Require a Pedestrian Safety Plan. • Require a time frame for the completion of improvements. The September 20, 2016 Planning Commission minutes are attached to this staff report. Following is a summary of the changes to the application since the Planning Commission meeting: 1. Offices were added as a permitted use. 2. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement has been added as a part for the PUD Ordinance. The applicant must submit a $25,000 escrow or letter of credit as a financial security to ensure the installation of the following improvements: a) Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left tum lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. b) Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. c) Install a paved connection between the northern and southern parking lots on the site by October 5, 2016. d) Relocate the northern access of the site 220 feet south of Highway 5 as shown in the September 15, 2016 SRF Traffic and Parking Study Option 1 by October 3, 2017. This relocated access shall be restricted to a right -out of the site. e) Sidewalks shall be installed within the site by October 3, 2017. f) A traffic study shall be completed within one year, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. 3. The PUD has been revised as follows specifying the development and regulations for the museum: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 3 e. Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated 9/15/2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -out only, relocating the Paisley Park north access to a minimum of 100 feet south of its current location. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 3, 2016. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paisley Park Museum — Planning Case 2016-24 October 3, 2016 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park from Industrial Office Park (IOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and adoption of the attached PUD Ordinance, Site Improvement Performance Agreement, and Findings of Fact." ATTACHMENTS 1. PUD Ordinance. 2. Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 3. Findings of Fact. 4. SRF Traffic and Parking Study dated September 15, 2016. 5. Amended Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 20, 2016. 6. Planning Commission minutes dated September 20, 2016. 7. Emails. g:\plan\2016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museum\executive summary.doc 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.22T11 10 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.2271130 Fax: 952.2271110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.d.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson, AlCP Community Development Director DATE: October 10, 2016 SUBJ: Paisley Park Museum BACKGROUND On October 3, 2016 the City Council reviewed the application from PRN Music Corporation for a rezoning of Lot 11 Block 1 Chanhassen Lakes Business Park to PUD to permit a museum at Paisley Park. At that meeting, the City Council voted 3-2 to table this item for additional information. City staff has meet with the applicant and has addressed the following issues: 1. Memorial and fencing issues The museum has as virtual fence as apart of an exhibit. Items left on the physical fence have been removed and archived and included in this exhibit. The museum is also adding memorabilia to include in the exhibit. 2. Posting of no parking on McGlynn Drive Staff will prepare a No Parking resolution for the City Council to consider along both sides of McGlynn Drive. 3. Signage for pedestrian access to trail on west side of Audubon Staff will work with the operators of Paisley Park Museum to provide pedestrian signage directing crossing at Hwy 5 and Audubon and prohibiting access along the east side of Audubon. 4. Updated Traffic study Traffic Counts will be taken south of Lake Drive; this is in progress. Trac counts and traffic calming opportunities for pedestrian crossing enhancements will be considered. 5. Civil plans for full build out of parking SRF is preparing the civil plans for the parking lot. Draft plans could be submitted in approximately 1 months. Assumptions need to be made with respect to survey, geotech, and existing infrastructure conditions. An additional week or two will be needed to get survey and geotech information. Draft schematics will be ready sooner. Once plans are submitted, there will be review by the Watershed District. Construction could be ready to start spring 2017. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing forTodayand Planning for Tomorrow Paisley Pak Museum City Council Work Session Page 2 6. Buses required for all visits until parking lot is complete The operator is reducing the number tickets sold per hour and the number persons per tour until the full parking lot is built. The Council may consider buses only until the entire parking lot is completed. Adequate parkingfor cars is required for any busing arrangements. 7. Potential Trail along Audubon The City Council discussed the lack of sidewalk on the east side of Audubon Road. It is staff's recommendation and the operator of the Museum to discourage pedestrian walking along the east side of Audubon Road in front of Paisley Park. Currently there is a sidewalk on the west side of the Audubon. This sidewalk connects with the trial along Hwy 5 and via a controlled signal for crossing. This trial goes under Highway 5 and connects to Lake Ann Park. If a sidewalk was installed along the east side of Audubon it would terminate at the end of The Paisley Park property and may force pedestrians to cross mid - block. In order to deter pedestrian and traffic conflicts along the east side Audubon Road staff is recommending that low vegetative landscaping (junipers, roses and barberry) be placed between the curb and the fence line. g:Vlan\2016 plauning cases\2016-24 paisley park muswma\sc nq 10-12-16 issuesAmx CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Affidavit of Publication Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's Southwest Newspapers zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described to PUD P�lazmned Unit Development Lot ii, Block 1, Chanhassen State of Minnesota) Lakes Business Park, Carver )SS. County, MN Section 2. Paisley Park County of Carver ) Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, Laurie A- Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized development standards and agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herold and the Chanhassen Vil- regulations of the IOP, Industrial !ager and li. full knowledge of the facts b=in stated as follows: Office Park District shall apply subject to the following (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal modifications: newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A-02, 331 A-07, and other applicable laws, as b. Permitted Uses. Only amended - the following uses are permitted: 1. Museum. - (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. L 2. Recording ofof studio.was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice 3. Retail sales products Notice is here incorporated as art of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of site provided no more than twenty stored or manufactured on the the newspaper specifies Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both percent (200b) of thefioor spaceis inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition used for retail sales. These sales and publication of the Notice: may include food, beverages and memorabilia. abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz 4. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan mustbe filed with the City atleast ten (10) days in advance of each LauneA. Hartmann concert. 5. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten Subscribed and sworn before me on (10) days in advance of each event 6. Office. 7. Multiplebuildingsona r, r lot. this dayof ,t,,t. 2016 C. Conditional Uses. The following conditional use is permitted: r.,,.,,..�....- 1. Hotel. d. Prohibited Uses. The JYNIMEJEAN�,ETTEEARi( following uses are prohibited: �✓ NO'.AAY PI;BiJC - AI'NNESOTA 1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as N lic'COMSSS1089ES0ir3t?18 permitted or conditional uses. ^^ 2. Outdoor events. S. Liquor sales and consumption. e. Materials and Design Fencesshal cumplywithCity RATE INFORMATION Buffer erYardrequire requirements, except Lo,n.�classified rate paid bycommercial users for comparable space ....$31.20per column inch Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch provide security screening. Rate actually charged for the above matter. .............................................. $12.59 per column inch f. Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following �• '1 G I (p a� development plans which are on t �J` file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan - SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -in for buses only MU_4.awt and right -out only for buses, and passenger vehicles. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3_ A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approvedby the Chanhassen City Council on October 24, 2016. 5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses, junipers and barberry. g. Parking 1. Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access. 4. All required permits, including from the Riley - Purgatory -Bluff (,Peek Watershed District, must be obtainedpriorm installing the pavement. 5. The north access shall be limited to a right -in for buses only and right -out of the site for buses and passenger vehicles. 6. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the SRF study. 7. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus. 8. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shallbeby bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest cars per hour maximum. 9. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on- site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking or guests shall be bused to and from the site. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference andmade apartof this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of October. 2016, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny lAufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Pillager on Thursday, November 3.2016: No. 4364) Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M. Mattick John F. Kelly Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Shana N. Conklin Amy B. Schutt James J. Monge, III Jerome M. Porter Kurt S. Fischer Grand Oak Office Center 1 860 Blue Gentian Road Suite 290, Fagan, MN 551 651452-5000 Fax 651-234-6237 www.ck-law.com CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association January 13, 2017 Ms. Jenny Potter City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Paisley Park Dear Ms. Potter: Please find enclosed, for the City's files, the recorded Site Improvement Performance Agreement / Paisley Park Planned Unit Development. Said document was recorded on December 27, 2016 as document number A639072. Thank you. Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Jean /jmo Enclosures 191COS%, SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA In Re: Application of PRN Music Corporation FINDINGS OF FACT for a Rezoning of Property legally described as AND DECISION Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Planning Case No. 2016-24 On October 24, 2016, the City Council met to consider the application of PRN Music Corporation to rezone property from IOP -Industrial Office Park to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The City Council of the City of Chanhassen hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and Decision in the above -captioned matter: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned IOP -Industrial Office Park. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial. 3. The description of the property is: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 4. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. 6. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. 7. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. 8. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 1892520 9. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 10. The museum will create new jobs in the City and the tourism will support the existing business. 11. The Planning Report No. 2016-24, dated September 20, 2016, prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council approves the rezoning to Planned Unit Development. Dated: October 24, 2016 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2 189252A M , Mayor Gerhardt, City Manager CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is Community for We-ProvidingforToday and Planning forTomorrow Memorandum of Understanding for Paisley Park February 16, 2017 Plannin¢ The subject property is governed by the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance. (Attached) A Site Improvement Performance (SIP) Agreement for Paisley Park Planned Unit Development was executed October 24, 2016. This agreement stipulates required performance and dates for completion. (Attached) The city is holding $25,000 security to guarantee compliance of the terms of the agreement SIP Agreement. Some of the items required in the escrow are landscaping and an update to parking study. The operation and use of the Paisley Park is governed the standards in the PUD ordinance. They including parking, hours of operation, retail sales, number of concerts, and private events. Building The building occupancy is currently functioning under a temporary certificate of occupancy. Outstanding issues include: • Sewer Access Charge (SAC) determination and payment of fees. The SAC determination establishing the use limitations of the building. The determination for the number of SAC fees shall match the owners/manger described intended use of the building. • Verification of ventilation of system functionality. Please be aware that the tent is a temporary structure and by city ordinance expires March 28, 2017. The PUD ordinance regulates how the tent can be used. There needs to be a permanent resolution to temporary tent structure as it does not meet the city ordinances. To accommodate you, in the short term, while working to find a permanent solution, a new permit is required prior to the March 28, 2017 deadline. PH 952.227.1100 • www.d.chanhassen.mmus • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 Fire The physical building plan currently meets fire code to function as a museum. This includes approved room capacities posted in each area. Paisley Park could have a concert with attendance under 999 if requested and approved through the ordinance. Paisley Park management and contractors are currently working on an update to the fire alarm system that would add the requirements to support a concert of over 999 after the system is installed, tested, and accepted by the Fire Marshal. The Fire Marshal and Fire Chief have also reviewed and approved a seating plan submitted by a contracted architect showing concert seating for 1,375. As stated, this seating plan can be used only after the alarm system is upgraded, tested, and fully functional. Concerts will require an on-site inspection of the concert set up prior to the city approved event taking place. This will include inspecting the seating and stage arrangement to ensure it meets approved plans and local fire codes. It may also include on-site observation of the event during operation. The definition of concert is s a live performance which would include amplified music, live performers, theatre lighting, pyrotechnics, etc. The ordinance also allows for private events. Paisley should utilize the special event permit process to ensure full approval from all city departments prior to the event. This would allow the fire department to review applicable fine codes as they relate to whatever type of event is being held, beyond a museum (i.e. clearing the main sound area of museum displays to add a full stage and seating for 1,375 people to listen to live music). gAplan12016 planning cases\2016-24 paisley park museum\paisley park compliance letter.docx CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property ("Subject Property") to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, MN Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District shall apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted: 1. Museum. 2. Recording studio. 3. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than twenty percent (20%) of the floor space is used for retail sales. These sales may include food, beverages and memorabilia. 4. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each concert. 5. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each event. 6. Office. 7. Multiple buildings on a lot. C. Conditional Uses. The following conditional use is permitted: 1. Hotel. d. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses. 1890870 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. e. Materials and Design Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. E Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -in for buses only and right -out only for buses, and passenger vehicles. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages and memorabilia. 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 24, 2016. 5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses, junipers and barberry. g. Parking 1. Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access. 4. All required permits, including from the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement. 5. The north access shall be limited to a right -in for buses only and right -out of the site for buses and passenger vehicles. 2 1890870 6. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the SRF study. 7. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there area sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus. 8. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shall be by bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest cars per hour maximum. 9. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended to provide more parking or guests shall be bused to and from the site. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24' day of October, 2016, by the City Council of the City of anhassen, Minnesota. l Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Lau nburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on November 3, 2016) 18"70 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CLRVER AND HENNEPIN7 COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property ("Subject Property') to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot Il, Block 1. Chanhassen Lakes Business Park. Carver County. MN Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development a. Intent The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses, development standards and regulations of the IO$ Industrial Office Park District shall apply subject to the following modifications: b. Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted: 1. Museum. 2. Recording studio. 3. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than twenty percent (20%) of the Boor space is used for retail sales. These sales may include food, beverages and memorabilia. 4. Twelve (12) indoor concerts per calendar year. A concert -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each concert. 5. Private events. An event -specific seating plan must be filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each event. 6. Office. 7. Multiple buildings on lot. C. Conditional Uses. The following conditional use is permitted: 1. Hotel. it. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses. 2. Outdoor events. 3. Liquor sales and consumption. e. Materials and Design Fence: Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening. L Development Plans and Regulations. The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. Site Plan - SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016, Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right -in for buses only and right -out only for buses, and passenger vehicles. 2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may, only be used for the sale of food, beverages and Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on will says that she is the publisher or the authorized aeent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and h:.s fuQ knowledge of tho facts herein stated as fellows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. C%( C/ was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abodefgbukltnnopgrstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of J1 ! m t 2016 N i Laurie A. Hartmann { JYMMEJEAtVE7EE.�1PKi S G"t`yt'?"`:' ' ii0'.ARt' f'li(k'.IC-1!'NHESOTA .+ .' +,IY COWISSION rDRRES 0 ir3!.".6 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch 3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may, not exceed 35 guest rooms. 4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council on October 24, 2016. 5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses. junipers and barberry. g. Parking 1. Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements. 2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shah be limited by the maximum occupancy under the Fire Code. 3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access. 4. All required permits, including from the Riley - purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, must be obtained priorto installing the pavement. 5. The north access shall be limited to a right -in for buses only and right -out of the site for buses and passenger vehicles. 6. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the SRF study. 7. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there are a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus. 8. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shall beby bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest cars per hour maximum. 9. If the on-site parking is inadequate. the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced to a level where the on- site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be amended toprovide more parking or guests shall be bused to and from the site. Any changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other agencies with regulatory authority over the site. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of Octobeh 2016, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday. November 3,2016'. No. 4364) (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT PAISLEY PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT dated October 24, 2016, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and Paisley Park Facility, LLC. BACKGROUND. A. The City has approved a rezoning of Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park to Planned Unit Development ("PUD"). The PUD requires the Developer to enter in this Site Improvement Performance Agreement. 2. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall construct the following improvements by the dates indicated: A. Re -stripe Audubon Road to include left turn lanes at the intersection of McGlynn Drive/the southern access to the site by October 5, 2016. B. Stripe the parking stalls by October 5, 2016. C. Allow the Paisley Park North Access to remain in the current location, while restricting access to 'Bus Only" and "Right -Out Only" for passenger vehicles through signage. This restriction would limit the potential for motorists traveling south along Audubon Road. A permanent barrier island should be placed in the access to control the right-in/right-out. 1880550 D. A traffic study shall be completed at 6 and 12 months, as directed by the Public Works Director, and shall include a level of service analysis of the intersections of Audubon Road at: the northern access, McGlynn Drive, Coulter Boulevard, and Park Road. The study shall also analyze the pedestrian movements across Audubon Road at Highway 5 and McGlynn Drive. If the level of service at any number of the intersections fails, and/or if the study identifies a pedestrian safety issue, the applicant shall install and pay for the recommended improvements such as a rapid flash crosswalk to the roadway system and/or the site. E. Landscaping shall be planted by spring of 2017 and maintained per the PUD. 3. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 4. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $25,000.00. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. B. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. D. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property and/or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. E. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other 1880550 agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. F. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. G. The Developer represents to the City that the development complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 6. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 7. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Paisley Park Facility, LLC, c/o Bremer Trust, National Association, 1100 West St. Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, PO Box147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317- 0147. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 1880550 3 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Dennyufenburg r, Mayor AND: odd Gerhardt, City Manager T e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � day of r , 2016, by Denny Laufenburger and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota My cam�iabn � Jan 37.2020 1880550 NOTA Y P C DEVELOPER: PAISLEY PARK FACILITY, LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company By, BREMER TRUST, National Association 0j Its Sole Mem r By: Alison A. Hauck, Tpecial Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) C�_,'^ ! )SS. COUNTY OF54W The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Lay of NO 69 2016, by Alison A. Hauck, the Special Administrator of Bremer Trust, National Association, the sole member of Paisley Park Facility, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. t � l NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 660 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 [RNK) 188055v1