Loading...
CAS-13_CAMDEN RIDGE REZONING/SUBDIVISION/CONDITIONAL USE FILE 1 OF 2.1, 4 N -k: r — I. -+ -; � N + - ,*--- -, - + `z +i. - <�- ��'-- -' , ,�,>% �-,��/ 7 7- /�,- ,/- � - 7 ;'/ / X,�\�, lx�, n , , + W 1�, + �4+ -+ --�., + � . + 4 + � - I \\ , \,\ , 11, i . "', � � I �-,� % ��%� ,- + , +—�k - 4 4 � + + + + -f + + -+ -.C% � -;� +- , ! / I ,\� ,� -� 1 3w,, .;. j,',., ��, I -� � j � I e I * / i i j - - I , ,,,, . -\ -N\ -1� 1* . - 001�1�1\" � -; .�.- , � I III I "'A\� �/+ 4i;�-J-11 - z �. , _vy t >\X .+ I -i'� 4, - � .;, I ,. 4. - ol � I , - ,�, /+ 1 -.111714""- 7 I -.' K ; /,; � ,- � I - / \-\ I -� + �� - . / . , ,W; / � ... � - –_N-------'--–n_`''~me or mader my direct Supervision and that I Name U 4�-- Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 . Pettr J. Hawkinson www.pioneereng.com Ron a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Nhnnesota Reg. No. 42299 Date 05-17-2013 '~�� � C]VIL ENGINEEIRS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHErnerS // ,� , / 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 I hereby cerffy that this plan was "amd by Revisions Date CONDITIONS |----�-----'---1 'O i / _ / / | | � \�� it-, ^,\ | ^,\ | | / / –{{/ / / `�~� � ,� �/_� | _...."v���',��,.-L--____�--_� �\`~/ !| \�A | \�� | ^ / !U� � ^ / J !ry /' ' / / i 100 50 0 100 / / � | - _ -- -_--� Sco|einFeet SECTION 26^ TWz^ 116^ RGE. 23 LOCATION MAP NO SCALE ^ Legal description for Preliminary plot purposes only OuUnt A. PIONEER PASS. and Out|ot A, JEUR|SSVN 13T AD0llON, according to the recorded plot thereof, Carver County, Minnesota LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE SUITE 600 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 JEURIS�u������ PARCEL CBANHAS8BN,MINNES{YTA /� /y 0"P �u5 Denotes Primary Bluff Creek Overlay District Denotes Secondary Bluff Creek Overlay District Denotes concrete Denotes gravel Denotes bituminous ----A---' Denotes controlled access /'`Y'–Y'`\ Denotes tree line -------X-------' Denotes fence (barbed wire) -------#-------' Denotes fence (chain link) — oh-------Dnnvteaoverhead utility lines * Denotes section corner monument No Denotes found iron pipe n�� Denotes water well NN Denotes electric box /l Denotes flared end section * Denotes light pole --��-- Denotes utility pole e Denotes test hole Legal description for Preliminary plot purposes only OuUnt A. PIONEER PASS. and Out|ot A, JEUR|SSVN 13T AD0llON, according to the recorded plot thereof, Carver County, Minnesota LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE SUITE 600 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 JEURIS�u������ PARCEL CBANHAS8BN,MINNES{YTA /� /y 0"P �u5 I I T"1 Ir p[1r-^r-�1t /r - I rl V E_ A rt T A r\ r11 T 1 /1 N I .�` r- n kAl I\/IV VV 250 M �� 1004 104 62 85 Q� DRAINAGE AND UTILITY 941 GI r T>> OUTEOTEASMENA OVER ALL OF OUTLOT A 310 86064sf 46 D��j ❑ ' 167 1.9758ac 1 R 289 o E_ U i \ ..` v 1N EgSglAlAOE 36 OF ENfA/T AA/0 16734sf N 0 75 85 83 at/ Olt '776 3F 0.3841ac ro 77 36 a� 42 4 0 A(C �` X77 C I 90 40 9 00 0 1� 72 75 5 s3 72 60 4 a � I -� 1276 sf 2 0.293pac 9 20388sf 4.6190 0.4680ac w °' 9.6257 '" 1.251Oo 11235sf V, 6 ACRES - 0� y. 3 TOTAL OUTLOT AREA 4.7903 ACRES TOTAL OUTLOTS 10443sf 0.2510ac 0.2579oc 32 NUMBER OF TWINHOME LOTS ` 13129sf M 0 4 58 p L4 10007sf 0.2397ac SQ. FT. LARGEST TWINHOME LOT 11492sf SQ. FT. SMALLEST SINGLE FAMILY LOT 0.3014ac 10451st w 5,147 902s 0.2297ac \ \>> CJ 0.2638ac -7 1 GROSS DENSITY EXCLUDES OUTLOTS s� 0.2399ac 10922sf � x 0• ac PROPOSED ZONING 75 68 6 AVAILABLE 11344sf r 7 0.2507ac r > 76 9 59 32 64 0.2604cc I 122 93 87 :�D 76 83 115 46 94 135 > m Q rl, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY N 5 m Z w a' 13 11 n 10 v 9 cn /'4_ EASEMENT OVER OUTLOT C ALL OF m m o 0 1` 01060 10106sf 10802sf M 10434st Io C:) 12272sf 10463sf m 0 c 0.2480ac 0.2395ac- O -n Ih OUTLOT C _ 0.2817ac Lo 135 i 0.2402ac 10025sf 0.2302ac C7 O _ 73 45 26 I^%' 10528sf - 53 sq 0 .2417ac 37317sf - - - 25 0.8567oc 0 6 n S5 r\ >8 Z) ^°^ 14049sf a, J 0.3225ac v 0 76 J3 173 h 60 y. 33 , E N J v D> U) rn 0 15384sf 0.3532ac 8 18895sf 0.4338ac 194 60 113 33 �\ 121 h J TO 11 - 13 vo 14 000 N 14733sf w °D 16207sf 14286sf 0.3382ac ha 12 0.3721 ac 0.3280ac jpl P 18942sf ,ol O' 131 0.4348ac 77 a6 56 �� 0 3230 c 00 11 T CP 2� 0 O 9S9j'L ( 11J T��2 0 O� 10 9 20388sf 4.6190 0.4680ac 16684sf 9.6257 0.3830oc TOTAL TWINHOME LOT AREA 4.7746 ACRES 65 0� 70 TOTAL OUTLOT AREA 77 a6 56 �� 0 3230 c 00 11 T CP 2� 0 O 9S9j'L ( 11J T��2 0 O� P12NEERengineering CIVR.ENGAIEERS LANDPLANN LANDSURVEYORS LANDSCAPEARCIUTEM 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com 9 2013 Pioneer Engineering �I301 3 30 3 7 , i I X27 I 1 e' oIr R3 'h0 0 36% O a o Ilk 0 si 2 4 3 a2 O\0h 9716sf q, 0.2231ac 1 ^ 1 5 \9, n P 10235sf 0.2350ac y�? 6 170 LTj7S 8 3 p61 ��o�`�hs\ of Ss w 0 1998ac 'l (iT}qoF x 70 \679 i ww 160 0�0 1 6813sf PO �31sf 5 m 8 0.1564ac 160 OU TLOTT ES p 19124 67675f 5928sf 9 0.1558ac a p0 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY, 0.1361ac 6 160 ASEMENT OVER ALL a '1F OUTLOT E 128 `O 29787sf '"1 0.1637 7141 6ac 00 1 ) 10 0.6838ac 098 160 F g `ter �y'S nja� Q ) ,`�, OL v� 1 1 0 203�4ac Rt �O'26c `• '7 "1 2 174 n 6 .2 pBO 72SOa M'h ^ 024568 c 11sf 3 2jI >> °° _14 °2>2 f to A99, ?�97aa 13935sf 0.3199ac S� \k� 3 1401 8s C 0.3218ac 20 �p 4 86 13944sf 90.3201ac � 11 h^ ti r Sc, 3 ' 16e, 1 w m � 82 NN O 5'��' J r ✓ C\ 16513sf �� I ✓ 0.3791 ac AP `°o 00 " i 100 50 0 100 Scale in Feet SITE I � � I ii --C.S�A.H_N0. 14 J I I 1 I SECTION 26, TWP. 116, RGE. 23 LOCATION MAP NO SCALE PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 5� o 1--5 0 11 ---------J L - - - - ----- being 5 feet in width, and adjoining lot lines unless otherwise indicated, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and rear lot lines unless otherwise shown on the plat. TOTAL. -AREA 23.8097 U) TOTAL R.O.W. AREA 4.6190 ACRES TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY LOT AREA 9.6257 ACRES TOTAL TWINHOME LOT AREA 4.7746 ACRES TOTAL LOT AREA 14.4003 ACRES TOTAL OUTLOT AREA 4.7903 ACRES TOTAL OUTLOTS J / \ NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 32 NUMBER OF TWINHOME LOTS 26 NUMBER OF LOTS 58 i LARGEST SINGLE FAMILY LOT 20,388 SQ. FT. LARGEST TWINHOME LOT 17,363 SQ. FT. SMALLEST SINGLE FAMILY LOT 9,902 SQ. FT. SMALLEST TWINHOME LOT 5,147 SQ. FT. AVERAGE SINGLE FAMILY LOT \ \>> CJ �' -7 1 GROSS DENSITY EXCLUDES OUTLOTS 3.05 LOTS/ACRE NET DENSITY EXCLUDES OUTLOTS & R 4.03 LOTS/ACRE PROPOSED ZONING C UTILITIES AVAILABLE A r\ n I 7 / J / I / / P12NEERengineering CIVR.ENGAIEERS LANDPLANN LANDSURVEYORS LANDSCAPEARCIUTEM 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 www.pioneereng.com 9 2013 Pioneer Engineering �I301 3 30 3 7 , i I X27 I 1 e' oIr R3 'h0 0 36% O a o Ilk 0 si 2 4 3 a2 O\0h 9716sf q, 0.2231ac 1 ^ 1 5 \9, n P 10235sf 0.2350ac y�? 6 170 LTj7S 8 3 p61 ��o�`�hs\ of Ss w 0 1998ac 'l (iT}qoF x 70 \679 i ww 160 0�0 1 6813sf PO �31sf 5 m 8 0.1564ac 160 OU TLOTT ES p 19124 67675f 5928sf 9 0.1558ac a p0 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY, 0.1361ac 6 160 ASEMENT OVER ALL a '1F OUTLOT E 128 `O 29787sf '"1 0.1637 7141 6ac 00 1 ) 10 0.6838ac 098 160 F g `ter �y'S nja� Q ) ,`�, OL v� 1 1 0 203�4ac Rt �O'26c `• '7 "1 2 174 n 6 .2 pBO 72SOa M'h ^ 024568 c 11sf 3 2jI >> °° _14 °2>2 f to A99, ?�97aa 13935sf 0.3199ac S� \k� 3 1401 8s C 0.3218ac 20 �p 4 86 13944sf 90.3201ac � 11 h^ ti r Sc, 3 ' 16e, 1 w m � 82 NN O 5'��' J r ✓ C\ 16513sf �� I ✓ 0.3791 ac AP `°o 00 " i 100 50 0 100 Scale in Feet SITE I � � I ii --C.S�A.H_N0. 14 J I I 1 I SECTION 26, TWP. 116, RGE. 23 LOCATION MAP NO SCALE PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 5� o 1--5 0 11 ---------J L - - - - ----- being 5 feet in width, and adjoining lot lines unless otherwise indicated, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and rear lot lines unless otherwise shown on the plat. TOTAL. -AREA 23.8097 ACRES TOTAL R.O.W. AREA 4.6190 ACRES TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY LOT AREA 9.6257 ACRES TOTAL TWINHOME LOT AREA 4.7746 ACRES TOTAL LOT AREA 14.4003 ACRES TOTAL OUTLOT AREA 4.7903 ACRES TOTAL OUTLOTS 7 NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 32 NUMBER OF TWINHOME LOTS 26 NUMBER OF LOTS 58 LARGEST SINGLE FAMILY LOT 20,388 SQ. FT. LARGEST TWINHOME LOT 17,363 SQ. FT. SMALLEST SINGLE FAMILY LOT 9,902 SQ. FT. SMALLEST TWINHOME LOT 5,147 SQ. FT. AVERAGE SINGLE FAMILY LOT 13,103 SQ. FT. AVERAGE TWINHOME LOT 7,999 SQ. FT. GROSS DENSITY EXCLUDES OUTLOTS 3.05 LOTS/ACRE NET DENSITY EXCLUDES OUTLOTS & R 4.03 LOTS/ACRE PROPOSED ZONING AVAILABLE UTILITIES AVAILABLE Legal description for Preliminary plat purposes only Outlot A, PIONEER PASS, and Outlet A, JEURISSON 1ST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by / ,( Revisions Date OS -17-2013 LENNAR me or under my direct supervision and that I Name am a duty Licensed Professional Surveyor Petr I. Hawkinson Designed NAP/KAWJ PRELIMINARY PLAT 16305 36TH AVENUE N SUITE 600 JEURIS SEN PARCEL under the laws of the State of Minnesota Reg. No. 42299 Date 05-17-2013 Drawn I PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 1 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 3 OF 15 _++++ + _+ + -+ +++ + + / + + + +.. + + +r. + + _+ + / ...+ + + ». ... + + + 4- ;- ! a i _ :. t. .+. +- a .q. rt .3.. f + _ i µ } + +. + -._ i. + _.- + a -.. + / .{. " + W .{. - - _ .+. .{. .+. � + +. + +. -F _ LL .+. ;.. - , LL + y + , . - . - +' + + + + + + + .. + i + + + - ++ + « / ». + + , , + » : - •. + a. Y .,. + , r + ♦ - .. « 'T a + , •. - ». t .,. + + a. + ., .« 4 4 .... .,. 1 .« -} + + r r r r\ r r � - � •� \ \ / / -• ' , + + t +« + -r + + + - + LL + + + + + + + + _ / \ _ + + + i + { t :+. a- t } ,+ + _+ , - + t t * + t + + + t + + + + r + + + �} + +�\\+ +» a �i Et12R ERVE1+ r+' + _+.« +' * t. "+ + / + + _ .} + - .,- \+ + } _ + E'1(I S'fi1 N Ps`� 11+ T` .{. . + + a- " . - .:. •. _ r .+ - } a.. .r ». .. + + + + + : : + µ , / + + ♦c + `+ +1 C7ZF%k 1 + +• + + + m + - + + + «+ A+ I+ - ». +' a.f UtNTIQNr .:. { ITIONt. ,:. _++- + srt-_+++`r+ 'r t '"' +T LL+ ++. rti + + + �t + -BASIN �L 1 t +L\ + + + + S -E e. +23; I W P.+ , t _ + . t . + . / --�-+ -a�v-� ± -1 r 11 t 1 µ +.: +. + 11�rt- RGE. " -I + 2 ' +++ + r+ +t + + + +\ t _ + + , + + + + + + + + M RETAINING WALL + + + WITH FENCE +L+ + } + �- t- $ + +. + + '!- + + + + .,. + ,. » ..... _ ; ' - DRI yE• S�DU "°' „� , �'' 1 : + + t + } + + + } .;- + r + + �.;•,• • , + ' 7H � y - Y _ -- onto--- --- +} ,Po _ rss¢_ === - - X1 9883 SF + + + + + +. + + .�- + - v . + +. + + + + + + + +. + + +. + -+ - + X:'12,7 undo A:10.934.SF ..`X71,235 SF - 3 SF ea .}. .« .i.. .- .. - .. _]_B. 3.9 \ \ :5 + + } + F + a- }' 4;46 F 32 SF F + + + + + - /�. .mao , '� T �_ia9�____ X:10:443 SF A 11,492 SF ,a mm + T + + a- } +. .} !- .+ + +. - + rt + + a + F 4 A:13,129 SF X10,007 SF B S -____ _____-Iq 8. 4.022 S �( : 3 65 SF F \ + .:. ... } + + + + .+ .,. + �. 8:4,595 SF X:9,902 SF - �- S+ T X:10,451 SF B: 3,502 SF 4 X:11,344 SF 1XtD.9 SF I B: 3,466 SF 3 5 ', + F + +' + + + t + + + _ + t :; + I 8 B: 3:970 SF '+ + _ B.368 SF B38 1 + .:. + } + .: +' + _- + + '+ t + + -- ------ 423 ------ 7 -\ • 2,222 + _ + i. + + + +- + + + + +- 1- •+• '• _ - - - E ----- . 5.302 + r+ + + i Ie B B v T 6 �A4Lt 4�"�, +. + + + + + + + + + .} .!_ 'y + } + .;.. - +. I _- WI FENCE --_�__ 1 B:z,,2 + + + + } + + + .}8-p+IT4MINPUS.+TKAIL + %� `�-�_ �O _ 1.,-" - 112 11 10 9 A 2 X:6.262 SF .}. + 'F + _ .}. + .} + + ` + + .+ + - _ .§' �� X12272 SF , I 8:2,505 SF - + a- + . ;.. _ } 5: ✓I �� I I} A1g106 SF X1,881 SF \ + + + + + + + r - ;.. + - \ , 8:4,295 SF �� I _-__��-- X;10,025 SF B: 3,537 SF 8:3,761 SF I X10,434 SF 3 X7,314 SF + 'F 1 + + '+ µ } + y + rt + .}. .!_ +. .,. + + I' ETEN TI ON I 13 8:3.509 SF -- + + + + + + + + +' + + + + + '« + - BASIN I I 5 __11_ _ 8:3,652 SF 8 /, \\ B: 2.926 5�. ` + k + w +' + y r 'F +- + + + '} + + +- + + + : j , �1 A %463 SF __ _ _ � A: 10.528 SF r ^ 4 ':'. -,.. rl -- -" B. 3,685 S } t + + + + + + + } + + + + + + C + 1 1 - B ,662 SF S. F r. F + + + + + !- +'}' a 'r -!- + + + + + W T/1 { OUTLOT C 1 ' L_-_eus__ : _t« \ �• + + + + + + + + + + +1+ + + t++ `4,049 SFi - Rm. PX1N \. �`"pf1- _ } + .} + + + + '} a- +. .!. +. + + + a- F .:. .917 SFi 1 - •b T \ t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + cell r \ / OUTLOT E \�1 + + ++ + + + + + .} .,.. +. 'F t + d 44 : +' 1jN ✓ i I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t t + + * - / `: b RLP \VK , 4� �. RETENTION / + + + '+ '+ + ++ + + + + + a- + k. �jVE i ;I ti I-� X'16.207 SF �_` � BASIN � / /• Q i /, v r i p°'00 B: 5,672 SF + + + + + + + + ,- + + + t t + + 5,384 SF : _ .+ _ ... 8:5,384 SF 8/ 1 X18,942 SF 13 X14.288 SF \ r/ + 'F _ .} - } µ + + + + + + + + '= + a -r , / i{ •�I 0 B: 5,000 SF \ O S A. •14,733 SF ; \ '6630 1F1 ti ;. .} + + ' + rt +. +. + :. +. i ,1 :5.15 SF , �?-/ + + + + 12 14 + + + + r + + + + -. \ 9 \ a: .t.++. .« .;.. r + + + +a+ +t+++++�+++ }T;- + .. / .\ Rejy 11 ,r 9 } + + + + + + + + + + + + + @OC 6 + r + + +. + 4. .F +. + + } .} + a. +. + + s + / � / � � � � / / /s / / (� � � 10 X:2.059 I j, X14,072 SF + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + X 18.895 SF \'b ' / / / / / / �.y25 SF \. a '. .- + a- + + + + '+' +' + + + + + + }. + + + + + -. ! 1 8:6,613 SF ll•• 8r'♦ i .. •:: . - t] 0 \ :7,80.5 + i2 SF + + + + + + + + -+ + + + + + + ++ + + 8 % A •+- 1 + i- - + + + 'r + + I- } + »' - + +' ;- +' + + *- - :.Laau _ /^ B 7136 SF / i ` :20.388 SF � / / / k- `� \ + + + F } a- + + + +. +. + !.. + + + k- + + {. +. + B: 5.1339 10 I / _ X:18 84� / / / �/''�, -F / � %. .... •� a� 9 + b + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + / / +. +� +++ + :- '+ +t ;.. + - .}++ +.+ F++µ; { ++ / / /r/ 9 / �, / X73.935 SFa --.• r } r + + +�+ } + + + + a + + „-�+ + + OF .:. !. +,. T i ++ r 0 `S\ + +++ + + ++.+'+ + ,,+ + + + + + + X:14.016 SF OPEN SPB4906 SF} + + r Y : ! \ + + /; + \T . + + + + + + + + + + + / + . ++ + + + t ty1 1 A:1 `944 Si.1 + / , + T.uWN'.3. t S + 4 + + + + + + + + i- + } + r + + + ++ + +. + + + r ++ + t + t + fi' + + +. + + +' r �-.,` + + � r ~ „r;\ + a- .+ +. r , +' i -.�\\ � .. +.-:., / X 16,513 SF + + + +- + + B:5,780 SF Y + a } + + + + r _ , ��--_�-__ r ' } + + BLUFF CfW1 K O L1/ DISTRICT 5 + « + + + t\ + +- + + + t + + : + t + } + + + -'- + + T t + + t + + ++++ + + + T + + � + +++ + + \+ + + + + + + _ +.:.. a + + } \1++ i+t +fi+ + + - + + } + r + + L +} i + + .t + + +- + \ -F + "r + »' 1 t + w' + + T • + + + 'r ti. II .�� �. 4- p +. \ +++ -<++ , ? + r y+ + r++ ++ . + + +_ , + r✓+' }V ! LJ✓ {+ L7 1 r / _ - _. + +++` + +_ + + + r + + + +" +.:..+ + Tom+ + + } + + / .;< + + + + .,. + + ! T + + r r - + + C4 t 4, /'fit 4 .;- i i. +. : } t + +a.+++ + +I + + t++ + j++ + + + +.:- +.:+«+_t +_ +- +++ •+ + J• +. +1 + + L3 ;.. .} + + _ + +. .:. r + + + i- + : t - _ +' - 'F 4 .3.. _ 4 + .. - ; /t, / Of Z Pz + F- .}. _. + .F > 'F }. T a' + ' + +' t t. T ,. +. + + .{. + .3. .. + .t. pZ~1)ei +1+ + +++ r + + + + '+ + t ++ + + + + + / / a + + + + + + ,- + r t + +� + + + + T + + + + T + + + + 4. T^_.. . :+ ++ + +++ ++ + + + ++ + + + + +++ + t + : § + + + + + + + / - Emma CIVILENOINEERS LANDP HERS LA SURVEYORS LANDSCAPEARCHITECrS I hereby certan was prepare certify that this plan by Revisions Dale 05-17-2013 (651)681-1914 Name Keith A. Willenbrin 2422 Enterprise I)f1Ve me or under my direct supervision and that I Mendota Hei Fax: 681-9488 s hts, MN 55120 a Designed NAP B www. ioneeren .com a duly Licensed Professional Engineer www.pioneereng.com ann der rhe laws of rhe Srate of Minnesota Ree. No. 25504 Dale 05-17-2013 Drawn KAW V 5 B: 3,332 SF 6 A:5,928 SI B: 2,371 SF 7 4 X 7.798 SF B:3,119 SF; / 5.174 S 2.070 SFr 2013 Pioneer Engineering o3 \ f 3 6,787 2,715 4 A &224 SF 8:3,290 S 5 A: 9,716 SF 8:3,886 SFj X10,235 SF 8 8:4,094 SF A: 8,703 SF 7 B: 3,481 SF X6,813 SF B: 2,725 SF e X6,787 SF 8:2,715 SF A.'7.141 SF B:2,856 SF X8,861 SF B:3,544 SF 11 X10,751 SF 8:4,300 SF 12 % A: 11,720 SF\ 04,688 SF A: 9,411 13 :3,764 SF A 584 14 .2,234 SF A: 5.J84 5F 15 8:2,234 SF 1 18 A RETAINING WALL WITH FENCE I ON BASIN 1;) / / I / I / NORTH OF BLUFF CREEK SITE DATA: PROPOSED LOTS: 58 15 - 75' WIDE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 17 - 90 WIDE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 26 - TWIN HOMES EXISTING ZONING: A2 PROPOSED ZONING: RLM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT STANDARDS AND SHORELAND OVERLAY AND BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY EXISTING LAND USE: MEDIUM DENSITY (4-8 UNITS/ACRE) RLM LOT MINIMUMS SINGLE FAMILY: LOT WIDTH: 50' LOT DEPTH: 110' LOT AREA: 9,000 SF FRONT SETBACK: 25' REAR SETBACK: 25' SIDE SETBACK: 5' GARAGE, 10' LIVING SPACE 35% IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE RLM LOT MINIMUMS TWIN HOMES: LOT WIDTH: 50' LOT DEPTH: 100' LOT AREA: 7,260/UNIT, (PROPOSED AVERAGE 7,999/UNIT) FRONT SETBACK: 25' REAR SETBACK: 30' SIDE SETBACK: 10' 40% IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE SHORELAND OVERLAY REQUIREMENT (RIVER/STREAM REQUIREMENTS): LOT WIDTH: 90' (SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 21-26) LOT AREA: UNDERLYING ZONING OTHER SETBACKS: FROM 212: 50' FROM BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT: 40' FROM WETLANDS: 43' PROPOSED LOT MINIMUMS SINGILE FAMILY: LOT WIDTH: 75' LOT DEPTH: 130' LOT AREA: 9,000 SF PER RLM REQUIREMENT 35% ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER SHORELAND DISCTRCT SEC 20-485 o -CONSERVATION SIGN -STREET LIGHT PRIMARY BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT SECONDARY BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT ,-LAT b (D-BLOCK A: 10500 SF TOTAL LOT AREA B: 3675 SF ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS AREA 0 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 00 -ENG -112289 -SHEET -SITE 4000 SERIES 1 6000 SERIES LINDBERGH PILLSBURY SINCLAIR SINCLAIR ST CROIX ST CROIX TAYLOR KELLOG WASHBURN SNELLING ADDISON AUBURN LANSING MONTICELLO SPRINGDALE SPRINGDALE STERLING WESTON BLAKELY CLEARWATER 4012 4006 4007 4010 4008 4011 4009 4013 4014 4015 6004 6005 6011 6007 6008 6008 6009 6010 6012 6013 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - Was SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2940 BE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2787 4 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3082 S- TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W72 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3735 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3174 W TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3498 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3315 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3441 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3140.04 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3092 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3403 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3131 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W21 SF SPRINGDALE A - FOLK TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA M26 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA �1�/6 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA M28 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3744 SF UNOBERGH A - FOLK PILLSBURY A - CRAFTSMAN SINCLAIR A - CAPE 000 SINCLAIR I A - CAPE COD ST CROIX A - CRAFTSMAN ST CROIX II A - CAPE COD TAYLOR A - FARMHOUSE 4013 A - COTTAGE 4014 A - FOLK 4015 A - COTTAGE ADDISON A - FARMHOUSE AUBURN A - CRAFTSMAN LANSING A - FOLK MONTICELLO A - CRAFTSMAN SPRINGDALE A - FOIR EXPANDED KITCHEN/NOOK STERUNG A - FARMHOUSE KUM A - FOLD BLAKELY A - FARMHOUSE CLEARWATER A - CRAFTSMAN TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3806 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2853 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 27M S' TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3173 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA M72 G TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3343 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 29M SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3475 W TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3295 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3241 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3140.37 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 31BOA4 W TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3507 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3204 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3628 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W68 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3926 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS MEAL4 4 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3329 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA M89 SF EGRESS AREA - 76 BE EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 S- EGRESS MEA- 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 38 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 22 SF EGRESS MEA - 54 SF EGREFG AREA - 54 SF EGRESS MEA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS MEA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS MEA = 76, EGRESS MEA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF REM PORCH AREA - 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 146 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = to SF REAR PORCH AREA 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH MEA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH MEA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA 1" SF REAR PORCH AREA = 114 BE REM PORCH MEA = I" SF REAR PORCH MEA = 1K SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 S- REM PORCH AREA = 144 S' REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH ARE = SF REM PORCH AREA = twt SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 4 lam Slam I'Wi PMRMu n R lam 8 i rmr HMI AIG S n IIleg1 rtA ai ^ FpOi Mll MFA notRR TWT PONT I1EA-x N. e 12m 8 lam 4am n Ram PIMP ANA ^ 2267 a PNrT NFA °i real rt B tam812W FWi HNr MFA D - Mol 4 a n R 4 h d tw ro 1.oa R rt F °16.00 N • 44.00 o n 8 1nm N eW 42.00 20.00 R n 1____- w.m n r--__ e $ �.� ^ r -4.0 n r_____ 4aW ^ i 12m r10.0 u.m �____ -FI -__ - 20.00 t s wW 1200 i e r_______ I GARAGE 1 n 32. 9i GARAGE 48. 10 i8 GARAGE • 18.00 N r-____ '� taw wJ10°'o I 6FmTFA + o GARAGE n FmT Herr MG xTM a a F_--___ GARAGE N d 40. rom PRei MFA R R n p Ilm Herr Aeu m rmr weir MG FaoT Mrr ANA � xzw ro R a ,13p - •elli e R n FWi HIWT µ FppT MNT � 17. GMAGE a xim o m $ 26.00 � a.DiS o 13.33 i� $ N 6711.54 o FWT Mrr MG E-01.00 ___ � 9 N sWT rMrr MFA INrT MFA f 4 �g'nimiWMfNEA 0 1 1 12500- INA ffi°I°1R1 rt -TwFm- 12.67q 20.00 d 8 ° + O.00N .00MT n B ri .8) FCOr %Mi AIFA 6.0 tw R R FCOr NR1T MFA N ills ro n_ "20.1] n ZffJ 4 rt r N 9.50 0-i n {WT NMf N6A 9. 0-i 18.04 12 as W. f. I2n N m.m r MG - 131T >f. -______fGARAGE m porch 2 6710.50 ilOr MNT N d Mf PPoM MFA RmrMFAN 2S° q n 1 porch FMIT 0-(A m POrch m0° n ]91e a rt ' m _ q ___ -GARAGE $R .00 O .G p0- rWr RIXT MFA - -r, IFN R R N r- __ _ �.SOo t �1 q,8rrmT 8 N 10 6. _____ i IQW p m 28. 1xA R M1 d 2. ______ npp d I f rPM MFA 6.0 1Q9 R M1fWi n_ p ppi NEA m20MP n 21PBq a__ R 1'141GARAGE m 1 Z G 2' 1 2µmxT N m ue!A -rn r______16.W GARAGE $ a_-______ r 10.00 GMACE R n = la GARAGE .� mIeb 1------- R R Ni n n-{. D __ ---4.0 N$ ap GARAGE 6067 in GARAGE n mu 4 RI ____ 16.00 sWI wMT MG a GARAGEGARAGE 20.00 22V ry R P :0�32.00 b 12.DD xoi F1].50 12, '� n g $ fn11a610.W GARAGE _ Ste 1221 8 $See GARAGE R r-__8rWr 4.r___ ixGARAGE D 13"I11.]t o 11.540- 20.46 0201] p 20.6] GARAGE m o n� N 18.54 10.00 p 1 n N 19.37o - N GARAGE am 5.1510.00 p Di D.fi7 $ Y app GARAGE - 20.00 ro 8 'J CMAGE $ N ten d 2267 N q 5.11m 1 1210 N2o.w i 0 8 r 67.67 i i� GARAGE 8 GARAGE ^ 14.1 N20.7B mE ofD Y.J x____10.00 m m 9.00 D n n 28.00 N 1246 28.1] N 12.46 14.17 12.20 0-20.46 u GARAGE 8 23.1] m 20.00$ ---' $� I GARAGE o �^� GARAGE m N --'- 4. GARAGE '^ n POIC h `Y o 4.0 m n "a oSo N22DO 2 pMch d 121] -226] .0 B Porch GARAGE µ _ ort GARAGEr '�8 126) '�f GARAGE 1D. W Dor N 20.SON10. mpp N ai GARAGE 8 w opo m 8 8 2 S {tB.m 'a par n 85.1 m m a gags GARAGE F. 20.00 8 R o i^ o m ri20.67 n 677 =taaN o �___ o 20.67 m 1 n a nI p N N a5 1aWN .Porch CMAGE 8. °i0.00 d o 12.50 N n 17.50 x� GMACE voi N h N 8 128] n 17.50 GARAGE 6f 1217 d 22x1 n m 11.0 12.17 - "122.67 N 10.0 1216 N2ww 120 2672 8 B IQm 61200. i 1267 B 13.33 $ 14.1 12.04 N2O.46 12W C; N N 20.46 2017 GARAGE m N •t 28. '^ 10 1 .00 N 19.54 26.00 N 12./8 - 1/.1 /' o.m 1 rv20.46 14.00 N 40.00 '20.OD 40.00$7 30.0020.00m SPRINGDALE C - COLONIAL LINDBERGH C - CRAFTSMAN PILLSBURY C - FARMHOUSE SINCLAIR C - COLONIAL SINCWR II C - COLONIAL ST CRUX C - COTTAGE ST CRUX II C - COLONIAL TAYLOR C - COLONIAL 4013 C - CRAFTSMAN 1014 C - CRAFTSMAN 4015 C - FOLK ADDISON C-'CLONIAL AUBURN C - CAPE COD LANSING C - CME COD MONIICELLO C - CAPE COD SPRINGDALE C - COLONIAL EXPANDED KITCHEN/NOOK STERUNG C - COLONIAL WESTON C - CO-BLAKELY C - CME COD CLEMWATER C - COLONIAL TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3806 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2BM SF AREA TOTAL IMPERVIOUS EA 2787 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3173 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W72 S- TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3329 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3218 SF TOTAL IMPERV1O18 AREA 3470 W TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3295 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA MOB SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3140 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3098 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3435 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3113 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3580 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3620 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3938 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS MEA A6Z SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA M28 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W60 SF EGRESS AREA - 76 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 W EGRESS AREA - 38 Sr EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS MEA - 22 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 76 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 BE REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REM PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 BE REAR PORCH AREA - 141 SF REAR PORCH MEA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 W REAR PORCH AREA = 1H SF REM PORCH AREA - 144 BE REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 W REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 114 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 3 REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AR" SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA =1" SF lam tem IBM p 44.00 trim Slaw 8 ° - tam 8 tam8 n.W µpp a __ n• 200 48.00 I6 N 4200 N s N 4aW 1 mW a IBM � FWTIRNr MFA O 26.00 taoT PNlT MG - R FWr PIMT NEA , SO.O0 R 28.00 a4' __ N w 2Taa R R p rWT rtWT MV. FWr .T MFA n FWr PANT `� o SB.DD sWT PRxr MG 58'� FWT rMMi MG R R % MG f n R i00r RMr MFA 6.(f D 2119 R R FI .. MFA n 1Na R R 2101 R R. t MEA -20-3 Y. W T � FWT TION N iII) q. R I- f RK" qr M_R____ n T 4 R 8 299 R R N Faar PRRT MFA nXT F1W1 AREA n_ }S21 °4 R 1aW r___�____ ii - NEAR- �.W SF. NEA- 241 e13. n i 2P2Mli IRNA p b 12.00 m 1 .00 T, _______ 4 \w 4 R <� '� _ _ NI R I- p a IWaRR N .� f IaW f ' - 11M4R 111° R GM GM xwR F. wMT NFA q m 2D DD MT Mrr MEA r $ r h FCOi RONr MFA R --___ ___- am Y ______FFm Y _ _ _ _ _ R 1 CMAGE 'o^ R_ __-_ Y o Y o r�i' �'TMr 18.00 GARAGE i--- 4' n GARAGE �--GMACE R GARAGE i8 GARAGE 8 s n r--- t AGE m AGE m 6.067 GARAGE o 0 10.00 Si 2 Rt 1 f g I^ GARAGE I a`i N o r 4.0 d p ry IS GARAGE 5.15 GARAGE n GARAGE tZ17 o 'GARAGE'R 8 F �_-__$a1 d SI g $ n S, - `� GMACE KK m 83 0 o n o 11.54 N 20.46 o nN N N - N N 8 5 d o .GARAGE S 12.67 m,pp1].50 iF� GARAGE I2n 1267 g20.m ri22.6]�t0 8 t2s 2aw8 R1Qm $ 1�a CA=RAGE 13.33 21204$ ri20.6] �n GARAGE N X20.1] 20.8] �nD GARAGE +! 28.17 N 19.3] 12.48 28.17 oi1937 1248 12.20r 2].1]m 11.8]2000 40.00 .a�' n 14.1 ' 2D.48 m orch m Porch o2aW 1217 12.500-20.00 m --- 8 2 porch Porc $ 8 orch '� ^ 21'62 1267 $ `y 141] 20.46 m2030.00 20.00050 "d PMch porch d 1 orc a 20.00 Por o9. Dore Wd �.04 11.0 i012W 22,W 61aoN n 1 "'22.00 dt�� 12.00 d N m+or m 10 m 20. "20.460- rt 20. 20.48 m 14.Op R SPRINGDALE D - CME COD LINDBERGH D - PRARIE PILLSBURY D - COLONIAL SINCLAIR D - COTTAGE SINCLAIR II 0 - CRAFTSMAN ST CRUX D - COLONIAL ST CROIX It D - COTTAGE TAYLOR D - PRAIRIE 1013 D - DUTCH COLONIAL 4014 D - TRADITIONAL 4015 D - FOLK 11 ADDISON D - PRAIRIE AUBURN D - COTTAGE LANSING C - CME COD MONTICELLO D - COTTAGE SPRINGDALE D - CAPE COD EXPANDED KITCHEN/NOOK STERLING D - CRAFTSMAN WESTON D - MAD111014AL BLAKELY D - CRAFTSMAN CLEARWATER D - FUK S AREA - 3806 BF AREA 2810 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2880 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3097 5' TOTAL IMPERVIOUS MEA 3072 SF TOTAL DRESS M AREA - 3257 3 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3217 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3329 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3E SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3418 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3140.03 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 31]] SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3475 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3192 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3802 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA, 3842 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3928 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 4174 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 336] SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3744 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOU TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AR EGRESS AREA - 76 SF EGRESS AREA 54 SF EGRESS AREA 54 SF EGRESS AREA A 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 38 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 22 SF EGRESS AREA 54 SF EGEESS AREA = 54 S: EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 51 SF EGRESS AREA = 5/ SF EGRESS MEA = 51 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA, = 54 BF EGRESS AREA = 78 SF EGRESS AREA A 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF REM PORCH AREA - 140- BF REM PORCH AREA = lu SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA 144 SF REAR POACH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH MEA - 1K SF REM PGtGt AREA = 144 3 REAR PGtG1 AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 1K 3 REAR PORCH AREA = 1K SF REM PORCH AREA = 1K 4 REM PORCH AREA = 1" S- REAR PUNCH AREA = 144 SF REAR POACH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 1H SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF law 12m a e e tam Sam 8 e - 40.mF Sox 8 lam j t2W u.m mm 4000 16.00 N 32.00 4800 N 4 D 1 r .W 28.00 50.00 ° 40.00 R R R 28 cj Ofa IOPT HMT NFA rmr wMI MFA d '0 FWiT� NT $ 40.00 °1 o wDr wyT NFA g FaP RM' MFA rmr wDr MrA fmT r°Mr NFA ffOf rMri .i fWT MR D 4 0 5B.DO B. fOpT fKNT INA_ --O SM2 q 1E ____ m 2D1 a R Rom PRXr NFA 18.00 $ 6 rWT FRxr ANA O i. w°IT MFA 6.D rmi NMr NFAN SOAR 4 R F 1yJ q R xw q N. HM 4 R NF/. - N a N p fWr P'Mr NFA ___ 1a AL2 N. R f 8 J]0- 4 R .4 N 19]e 4 R 1PoI q a - 'n r n R 2D3 4. r fa]T PIMi 11FA - AW S. m Y12) q R f F- A 4, 7 3 s F____-- 1Qm ; am 20.00 ______ h r t6DD Y n ____ N - ____ jj t j 4 R�-- m }311 R R 2.R1 q R n i - tam n n O f .1 ANA - 2367 i• y R n rc2121 m MG n CW�wNT MEA D.OD fom wmT uFA 12. 12. D00 $ n r� rp r ___ i n am �_-__ r____--__ CMAGE r GARAGE ul GARAGE GARAGE n 10.00 GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE R WAGE I o f 4.0 r 4.0 o • o 6.067 r GARAGE x1 $ee GARAGE 61' 3 CMAGE R R n 8 GARAGE m o S n $ nI N GARAGE I GARAGE d5' Ivi 17.50 i'� GARAGE $ S 1].50 �� CMAGE $j a1 M �. 8 010 JJ� n `� ee GARAGE $ '8 o I o o n11.54N 20.48 8 $ 0- 18.04 N 18.04 CMAGE d �^ N 8 8 226]^ $5" 8 d - 01333 i= o N X20.6] GARAGE o _ 20.8] GARAGE 17.}3N� 1248 1]33oi� 12.46 = N o 5. 5�� 8 1267 ten 1221 2m a R 1aW 12.04 a 20.1] d 121] 12.17 __ 1220 40.00 30.00 20.00N 121) 11.67 N30.pp 1217 12.500-20.00 m -y6 S 121] �20.mn $ port $ 121] -tam 12.1] 267 N2o.46 6767.672 126] 82a.m 14.1 '20.48 n o arG_I o 14,1] 0-20.46 c 11.67$ '20.00 1 020.500-10. '� For bg' o 0 20.500-10' d N N d _ m por 25.17m 2D.00 Inas Laos e h o Parc m 11.0 0 22.00N0.500-2200 8 Poch Porch pore ^ pmts 169. 0 0 I m 6 t2a Ia10.4 b = 20. n 1 d 1I 9.5001. d a 9.eJ 19 10 o N 0- n 1 8.00 N N 9.25 1 9.25 925 19. 25 10 14.00 o N SPRINGDALE E - PRAIRIE UNDBERGI E - COUUNIA PILLSBURY E - CME OW SWGNR E - FARMHOUSE SINCLAIR II E - TRADITIONAL ST CROIX E - CRAFTSMAN II ST CRUX 6 E - FOLK TAYLOR E - DRAFTSMAN 4013 E - FOLK 4014 E - COTTAGE 4015 E - FARMHOUSE ADDISON E - CRAFTSMAN AUBURN E - PRAIRIE LANSING D - COLONIAL SPRINGDALE E - PRAIRIE EXPANDED KITCHEN/NOOK STERLING E - PRAIRIE WESTON E - CO7T6CB�.%� BLAKELY E - COTTAGE CLEARWATER E - COTTAGE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3759 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2848 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2993 BE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 2888 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3230 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3329 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3174 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3473 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3294 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS MEA 3466 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3148 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3162 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3460 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3625 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3884 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3933 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA(4464 SF/ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W75 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W89 SF EGRESS AREA = 76 SF EGRESS AREA - M SF EGRESS AREA - M BE EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 38 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 22 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 76 Y.� EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA - 146 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 1H SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 BE REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA - 114 SF REM POPCH AREA - 114 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 Si REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 1" SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 S- REM PORCH ARE" SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 W 2W lam • 16.00 N 44.00 lam taw 8 40.00 40.m 8 ,aW 12m ___ ° 8 i -- 8 8 4am xim a W. 16A0 4600 19.00 N 42.00 smr P•err ANA $ 26.00 50.00 N (K 6 p iW1 MR NFA 40.00 $ bm imr MIr MEA imr IMNr MFA R 50.00 Px g 9.00 O4' Ll FmT HMI NEA imT wMr MEA HW ro R 1 N AM 4 R 40.00 n A2M q R `� FOpT HMT NEA n Fmr %M '✓ rl N O SB.00 rmr .T MFA Ira Fmi IMMi MFA W 2x0 R R n 'ry n g imi HMl MEA 6O 1996HMI MFAm fmT HMr NFA R fp a' ro R 3XK 4 R n MEA- 2416 Y. F°Or HMr HYIi HMi N m' $ 206 4 R m 1^M 4 1L n ]M4 R R N $ fIXR HIHT AIFA fO]i Peri ANA R 1M4R p xwlro. O n_ r r B - r D ________ O ________ NEA - AJH i. ME4 -2616 S. rmT pA1T MFw - F n 2716 R R q $ = n f 0. S twm am ____-2 em j _ a. a R .___ 20. F um a kY°'1 pARAGE rj G .00 g 1 r____ -____P ( 16.00 1 n m 12 2 � m __ =CMAGE f r - 4. 1D.� ___--tam in-__ GARAGE 8 g GARAGE Io CMAGE R GMACE _______ MACE 1 GARAGE I n 8 I_ -_- m $ 4.0 i a 6"0� GMACE "� GARAGE i GARAGE n �n o a I 8 GARAGE o q $ n m sasl. GARAGE p $e.t o GMACE 'R. rm CMAGE i GARAGE A ]. m GARAGE d $at N 8 '� 85.1 "a; p i ani- $ B GARAGE $ a .830 o N S nl _ N f o $ $ n mS o N gai 8 S 1L6p q 1zm 8a 8 d 13.37 i� $ 1'r ri20.6J GARAGE 'P ? 0- 19.04 0- 3] o m 1. nm =10.00 iTm 8 d o - Gn inm Ni I2n N taw trim f 12.04 '� o .1] 16.000- `y2]B 1fi.00 x11 12113 1 17 .00 40.00 30.00 "20.00 g N tam 12.17 12. 0 N ^ ch 12.50 0. 1] 2 1267 8 14.1 N m 121] m m 1217 m n 14.17 20.46 m Ily 0. 0 1x1) 0 0.00 X610.50 0. 1x67 8 m.m N 8 Parch P n tam n m.W orch m 1 .0 Parc o m Or 2 ,2.67 X610. 2 7 B arts p o I'0 810.Ory9 rfi N 0 61aoN d 19 h 10.25 610. N d m P 21. H N 8w 0-1 161P200 P2.W 6711.561 11.0 ST CRUX G - GAPE COD TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 32M SF SPRINGDALE F - TRADIRONAL LINDBERGH F - COTTAGE PILLSBURY F - COTTAGE SINCLAIR F - FRENCH SINCWR II F - COTTAGE SPRINGDALE 8 - COTTAGE TAYLOR F - COTTAGE 4015 F - TRADITIONAL ADDISON F - MAOITIWAL LANSING E - CRAFTSMAN LINDBERGH B - CME COD PILLSBURY B - FOLK SINCLAIR B - FOLK SINCLAIR It B - FOLK ST CROIX 8 - FOLK ST CROIX 11 B - CRAFTSMAN TAYLOR B - FOLK 4013 B - COLONIAL 4014 B - FARMHOUSE x015 B - CAPE Can ADDISON B - FOIX AUBURN B - FOLK LANSING B - FARMHWK MONTICELLO B - FOLIC SPRINGDALE B - COTTAGE EXPMDED KITCHEN/NOOK STERLING B - FOLK WESTON B - PRAIRI BLAKELY B - TRADITIONAL CLEARWATER B - TRADITIONAL TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - Was SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2940 BE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2787 4 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3082 S- TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W72 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3735 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3174 W TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3498 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3315 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3441 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3140.04 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3092 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3403 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3131 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W21 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3881 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA M26 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA �1�/6 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA M28 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3744 SF EGRESS AREA - 76 BE EGRESS MEA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 W EGRESS AREA - 54 S' EGRESS AREA - 54 3 EGRESS AREA - 38 SF EGRESS MEA - 54 S- EGRESS AREA - 22 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 BE EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS MEA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 76`9 JEURIS SEN PARCEL EGRESS AREA = 54 BE EGRESS AREA = 54 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 BF REAR PORCH AREA - IH BE REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 BF REM PORCH AREA - 144 BE REAR PORCH AREA = 144 BF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 Si REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH MEA - 144 SF REM PORCH MEA 1H SF REAR PORCH AREA - IH W REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH ARE = SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 1K SF lAm HIM $ N 40.00 4am 12m S 50.00 2600 dd%' 40.00 8.00 n 3200 1FWr 48.00 16.00 N 44. 0 i17% 4IRNA 8 4O.CG 1WrT MEA 8.0m I'Wi PMRMu n R lam 8 i rmr HMI AIG S n IIleg1 rtA ai ^ FpOi Mll MFA notRR TWT PONT I1EA-x N. e amJ rWr HMT NEA 4am n Ram PIMP ANA ^ 2267 a PNrT NFA °i real rt B tam812W FWi HNr MFA D - Mol 4 a n R 4 h d tw ro 1.oa R rt F = o n 8 eW 42.00 20.00 R n 1____- n r--__ e $ ^ r -4.0 n r_____ ^ r10.0 �____ -__ - 20.00 t s µm wW 1200 i e r_______ I GARAGE 9i GARAGE 10 i8 GARAGE • r-____ '� taw I 6FmTFA + o GARAGE n F_--___ GARAGE N I.� GARAGE Sl �Mi18002800. a GMACE S .W rmr weir MG a 1]33 e 8 ai a GARAGE 8 tam 17. GMAGE a o m $ 8 13.33 i� $ N 6711.54 o n o ry 9 n o r ox67 8 4 �g'nimiWMfNEA 0 1 1 12500- 0 -TwFm- 12.67q 20.00 d 8 X010.50 O.00N .00MT 1 ] ri .8) 4 1267 8 14.1 perch 2.48 "20.1] 9.50 0-i 1 4 1 4 9. 0-i 18.04 12 I2n N m.m W40.00 m porch 2 6710.50 I2n 1267 Wpp RmrMFAN 22m R R porch IWr wMT NFA POrch m0° fmT PRHr m FmiwMlA-Tb ,� .00 O .G p0- imf RDi MFA vi . -r, o d FmTMfrNFAP �.SOo t �1 q,8rrmT 8 N 10 6. p m 28. d 2. d 2 rPM MFA 6.0 1Q9 R M1fWi p ppi NEA m20MP 2' 2µmxT N m ue!A -rn a_-______ mIeb R R Ni n mu 4 RI ____ sWI wMT MG a 20.00 22V ry R P :0�32.00 b 12.DD 12, r-__8rWr 4.r___ 10.00 r n am Y app Y r___-___ - 20.00 ro GARAGE x____10.00 tam F-_-__1 GARAGE R I 6 + GARAGE u GARAGE 8 ---' $� I GARAGE o �^� GARAGE m N --'- 4. GARAGE '^ n `Y o 4.0 GMACE d d 6.0' GARAGE GARAGEr '�8 '�f GARAGE CMAGE 16 6 ai GARAGE 8 w i I� 8 8 2 S {tB.m n 85.1 m 8 '� 0.1 2221 8 gags GARAGE F. 8 R o i^ o m ri20.67 n o 11.54 o o �___ o 20.67 m o nI p N N a5 CMAGE d o 12.50 N n 17.50 x� GMACE voi N N 8 128] n 17.50 GARAGE 1217 d 22x1 n 12.17 - "122.67 N 10.0 1216 N2ww 2672 8 B IQm i 1267 B 13.33 $ 14.1 12.04 N2O.46 GARAGE N N 20.46 2017 GARAGE m N 28. 19.54 12.46 19.54 26.00 N 12./8 - 1/.1 /' o.m 1 rv20.46 23.1] m 2000 N 40.00 '20.OD 40.00$7 30.0020.00m porch 20.00 n -pat $ N a 121) mm m PNa $N SI Ports "� '� ^ 67.67 ♦ Rorch orch m Porc m port no 5 1 L5N P.Parc n 08. ng ae. 679 68.5 '014.00 m11.0 tosN IOAo9 N 120 a '0 20. In 610 MOD SPRINGDALE C - COLONIAL LINDBERGH C - CRAFTSMAN PILLSBURY C - FARMHOUSE SINCLAIR C - COLONIAL SINCWR II C - COLONIAL ST CRUX C - COTTAGE ST CRUX II C - COLONIAL TAYLOR C - COLONIAL 4013 C - CRAFTSMAN 1014 C - CRAFTSMAN 4015 C - FOLK ADDISON C-'CLONIAL AUBURN C - CAPE COD LANSING C - CME COD MONIICELLO C - CAPE COD SPRINGDALE C - COLONIAL EXPANDED KITCHEN/NOOK STERUNG C - COLONIAL WESTON C - CO-BLAKELY C - CME COD CLEMWATER C - COLONIAL TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3806 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2BM SF AREA TOTAL IMPERVIOUS EA 2787 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3173 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W72 S- TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 3329 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3218 SF TOTAL IMPERV1O18 AREA 3470 W TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3295 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA MOB SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3140 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3098 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3435 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3113 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3580 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3620 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3938 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS MEA A6Z SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA M28 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W60 SF EGRESS AREA - 76 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 W EGRESS AREA - 38 Sr EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS MEA - 22 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 76 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 BE REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REM PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 BE REAR PORCH AREA - 141 SF REAR PORCH MEA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 W REAR PORCH AREA = 1H SF REM PORCH AREA - 144 BE REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 W REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 114 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 3 REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AR" SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA =1" SF lam tem IBM p 44.00 trim Slaw 8 ° - tam 8 tam8 n.W µpp a __ n• 200 48.00 I6 N 4200 N s N 4aW 1 mW a IBM � FWTIRNr MFA O 26.00 taoT PNlT MG - R FWr PIMT NEA , SO.O0 R 28.00 a4' __ N w 2Taa R R p rWT rtWT MV. FWr .T MFA n FWr PANT `� o SB.DD sWT PRxr MG 58'� FWT rMMi MG R R % MG f n R i00r RMr MFA 6.(f D 2119 R R FI .. MFA n 1Na R R 2101 R R. t MEA -20-3 Y. W T � FWT TION N iII) q. R I- f RK" qr M_R____ n T 4 R 8 299 R R N Faar PRRT MFA nXT F1W1 AREA n_ }S21 °4 R 1aW r___�____ ii - NEAR- �.W SF. NEA- 241 e13. n i 2P2Mli IRNA p b 12.00 m 1 .00 T, _______ 4 \w 4 R <� '� _ _ NI R I- p a IWaRR N .� f IaW f ' - 11M4R 111° R GM GM xwR F. wMT NFA q m 2D DD MT Mrr MEA r $ r h FCOi RONr MFA R --___ ___- am Y ______FFm Y _ _ _ _ _ R 1 CMAGE 'o^ R_ __-_ Y o Y o r�i' �'TMr 18.00 GARAGE i--- 4' n GARAGE �--GMACE R GARAGE i8 GARAGE 8 s n r--- t AGE m AGE m 6.067 GARAGE o 0 10.00 Si 2 Rt 1 f g I^ GARAGE I a`i N o r 4.0 d p ry IS GARAGE 5.15 GARAGE n GARAGE tZ17 o 'GARAGE'R 8 F �_-__$a1 d SI g $ n S, - `� GMACE KK m 83 0 o n o 11.54 N 20.46 o nN N N - N N 8 5 d o .GARAGE S 12.67 m,pp1].50 iF� GARAGE I2n 1267 g20.m ri22.6]�t0 8 t2s 2aw8 R1Qm $ 1�a CA=RAGE 13.33 21204$ ri20.6] �n GARAGE N X20.1] 20.8] �nD GARAGE +! 28.17 N 19.3] 12.48 28.17 oi1937 1248 12.20r 2].1]m 11.8]2000 40.00 .a�' n 14.1 ' 2D.48 m orch m Porch o2aW 1217 12.500-20.00 m --- 8 2 porch Porc $ 8 orch '� ^ 21'62 1267 $ `y 141] 20.46 m2030.00 20.00050 "d PMch porch d 1 orc a 20.00 Por o9. Dore Wd �.04 11.0 i012W 22,W 61aoN n 1 "'22.00 dt�� 12.00 d N m+or m 10 m 20. "20.460- rt 20. 20.48 m 14.Op R SPRINGDALE D - CME COD LINDBERGH D - PRARIE PILLSBURY D - COLONIAL SINCLAIR D - COTTAGE SINCLAIR II 0 - CRAFTSMAN ST CRUX D - COLONIAL ST CROIX It D - COTTAGE TAYLOR D - PRAIRIE 1013 D - DUTCH COLONIAL 4014 D - TRADITIONAL 4015 D - FOLK 11 ADDISON D - PRAIRIE AUBURN D - COTTAGE LANSING C - CME COD MONTICELLO D - COTTAGE SPRINGDALE D - CAPE COD EXPANDED KITCHEN/NOOK STERLING D - CRAFTSMAN WESTON D - MAD111014AL BLAKELY D - CRAFTSMAN CLEARWATER D - FUK S AREA - 3806 BF AREA 2810 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2880 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3097 5' TOTAL IMPERVIOUS MEA 3072 SF TOTAL DRESS M AREA - 3257 3 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3217 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3329 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3E SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3418 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3140.03 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 31]] SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3475 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3192 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3802 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA, 3842 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3928 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 4174 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 336] SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3744 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOU TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AR EGRESS AREA - 76 SF EGRESS AREA 54 SF EGRESS AREA 54 SF EGRESS AREA A 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 38 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 22 SF EGRESS AREA 54 SF EGEESS AREA = 54 S: EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 51 SF EGRESS AREA = 5/ SF EGRESS MEA = 51 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA, = 54 BF EGRESS AREA = 78 SF EGRESS AREA A 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF REM PORCH AREA - 140- BF REM PORCH AREA = lu SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA 144 SF REAR POACH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH MEA - 1K SF REM PGtGt AREA = 144 3 REAR PGtG1 AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 1K 3 REAR PORCH AREA = 1K SF REM PORCH AREA = 1K 4 REM PORCH AREA = 1" S- REAR PUNCH AREA = 144 SF REAR POACH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 1H SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF law 12m a e e tam Sam 8 e - 40.mF Sox 8 lam j t2W u.m mm 4000 16.00 N 32.00 4800 N 4 D 1 r .W 28.00 50.00 ° 40.00 R R R 28 cj Ofa IOPT HMT NFA rmr wMI MFA d '0 FWiT� NT $ 40.00 °1 o wDr wyT NFA g FaP RM' MFA rmr wDr MrA fmT r°Mr NFA ffOf rMri .i fWT MR D 4 0 5B.DO B. fOpT fKNT INA_ --O SM2 q 1E ____ m 2D1 a R Rom PRXr NFA 18.00 $ 6 rWT FRxr ANA O i. w°IT MFA 6.D rmi NMr NFAN SOAR 4 R F 1yJ q R xw q N. HM 4 R NF/. - N a N p fWr P'Mr NFA ___ 1a AL2 N. R f 8 J]0- 4 R .4 N 19]e 4 R 1PoI q a - 'n r n R 2D3 4. r fa]T PIMi 11FA - AW S. m Y12) q R f F- A 4, 7 3 s F____-- 1Qm ; am 20.00 ______ h r t6DD Y n ____ N - ____ jj t j 4 R�-- m }311 R R 2.R1 q R n i - tam n n O f .1 ANA - 2367 i• y R n rc2121 m MG n CW�wNT MEA D.OD fom wmT uFA 12. 12. D00 $ n r� rp r ___ i n am �_-__ r____--__ CMAGE r GARAGE ul GARAGE GARAGE n 10.00 GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE R WAGE I o f 4.0 r 4.0 o • o 6.067 r GARAGE x1 $ee GARAGE 61' 3 CMAGE R R n 8 GARAGE m o S n $ nI N GARAGE I GARAGE d5' Ivi 17.50 i'� GARAGE $ S 1].50 �� CMAGE $j a1 M �. 8 010 JJ� n `� ee GARAGE $ '8 o I o o n11.54N 20.48 8 $ 0- 18.04 N 18.04 CMAGE d �^ N 8 8 226]^ $5" 8 d - 01333 i= o N X20.6] GARAGE o _ 20.8] GARAGE 17.}3N� 1248 1]33oi� 12.46 = N o 5. 5�� 8 1267 ten 1221 2m a R 1aW 12.04 a 20.1] d 121] 12.17 __ 1220 40.00 30.00 20.00N 121) 11.67 N30.pp 1217 12.500-20.00 m -y6 S 121] �20.mn $ port $ 121] -tam 12.1] 267 N2o.46 6767.672 126] 82a.m 14.1 '20.48 n o arG_I o 14,1] 0-20.46 c 11.67$ '20.00 1 020.500-10. '� For bg' o 0 20.500-10' d N N d _ m por 25.17m 2D.00 Inas Laos e h o Parc m 11.0 0 22.00N0.500-2200 8 Poch Porch pore ^ pmts 169. 0 0 I m 6 t2a Ia10.4 b = 20. n 1 d 1I 9.5001. d a 9.eJ 19 10 o N 0- n 1 8.00 N N 9.25 1 9.25 925 19. 25 10 14.00 o N SPRINGDALE E - PRAIRIE UNDBERGI E - COUUNIA PILLSBURY E - CME OW SWGNR E - FARMHOUSE SINCLAIR II E - TRADITIONAL ST CROIX E - CRAFTSMAN II ST CRUX 6 E - FOLK TAYLOR E - DRAFTSMAN 4013 E - FOLK 4014 E - COTTAGE 4015 E - FARMHOUSE ADDISON E - CRAFTSMAN AUBURN E - PRAIRIE LANSING D - COLONIAL SPRINGDALE E - PRAIRIE EXPANDED KITCHEN/NOOK STERLING E - PRAIRIE WESTON E - CO7T6CB�.%� BLAKELY E - COTTAGE CLEARWATER E - COTTAGE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3759 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2848 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2993 BE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 2888 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3230 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3329 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3174 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3473 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3294 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS MEA 3466 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3148 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3162 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3460 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3625 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3884 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3933 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA(4464 SF/ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W75 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W89 SF EGRESS AREA = 76 SF EGRESS AREA - M SF EGRESS AREA - M BE EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 38 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 22 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 76 Y.� EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA - 146 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 1H SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 BE REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA - 114 SF REM POPCH AREA - 114 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 Si REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 1" SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 S- REM PORCH ARE" SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 W 2W lam • 16.00 N 44.00 lam taw 8 40.00 40.m 8 ,aW 12m ___ ° 8 i -- 8 8 4am xim a W. 16A0 4600 19.00 N 42.00 smr P•err ANA $ 26.00 50.00 N (K 6 p iW1 MR NFA 40.00 $ bm imr MIr MEA imr IMNr MFA R 50.00 Px g 9.00 O4' Ll FmT HMI NEA imT wMr MEA HW ro R 1 N AM 4 R 40.00 n A2M q R `� FOpT HMT NEA n Fmr %M '✓ rl N O SB.00 rmr .T MFA Ira Fmi IMMi MFA W 2x0 R R n 'ry n g imi HMl MEA 6O 1996HMI MFAm fmT HMr NFA R fp a' ro R 3XK 4 R n MEA- 2416 Y. F°Or HMr HYIi HMi N m' $ 206 4 R m 1^M 4 1L n ]M4 R R N $ fIXR HIHT AIFA fO]i Peri ANA R 1M4R p xwlro. O n_ r r B - r D ________ O ________ NEA - AJH i. ME4 -2616 S. rmT pA1T MFw - F n 2716 R R q $ = n f 0. S twm am ____-2 em j _ a. a R .___ 20. F um a kY°'1 pARAGE rj G .00 g 1 r____ -____P ( 16.00 1 n m 12 2 � m __ =CMAGE f r - 4. 1D.� ___--tam in-__ GARAGE 8 g GARAGE Io CMAGE R GMACE _______ MACE 1 GARAGE I n 8 I_ -_- m $ 4.0 i a 6"0� GMACE "� GARAGE i GARAGE n �n o a I 8 GARAGE o q $ n m sasl. GARAGE p $e.t o GMACE 'R. rm CMAGE i GARAGE A ]. m GARAGE d $at N 8 '� 85.1 "a; p i ani- $ B GARAGE $ a .830 o N S nl _ N f o $ $ n mS o N gai 8 S 1L6p q 1zm 8a 8 d 13.37 i� $ 1'r ri20.6J GARAGE 'P ? 0- 19.04 0- 3] o m 1. nm =10.00 iTm 8 d o - Gn inm Ni I2n N taw trim f 12.04 '� o .1] 16.000- `y2]B 1fi.00 x11 12113 1 17 .00 40.00 30.00 "20.00 g N tam 12.17 12. 0 N ^ ch 12.50 0. 1] 2 1267 8 14.1 N m 121] m m 1217 m n 14.17 20.46 m Ily 0. 0 1x1) 0 0.00 X610.50 0. 1x67 8 m.m N 8 Parch P n tam n m.W orch m 1 .0 Parc o m Or 2 ,2.67 X610. 2 7 B arts p o I'0 810.Ory9 rfi N 0 61aoN d 19 h 10.25 610. N d m P 21. H N 8w 0-1 161P200 P2.W 6711.561 11.0 ST CRUX G - GAPE COD TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 32M SF SPRINGDALE F - TRADIRONAL LINDBERGH F - COTTAGE PILLSBURY F - COTTAGE SINCLAIR F - FRENCH SINCWR II F - COTTAGE ST CROIX F - FARMHOUSE TAYLOR F - COTTAGE 4015 F - TRADITIONAL ADDISON F - MAOITIWAL LANSING E - CRAFTSMAN SPRINGDALE F - TRADITIONAL EXPANDED KITCHEN/NOOK TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3759 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2940 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2993 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 2961 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 32M SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3216 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA M45 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3298 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 3406 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA MCI SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA W49 SF EGRESS AREA = 76 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 BE EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA - 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS MEA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF EGRESS AREA = 54 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 BE REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REAR PORCH AREA - 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 144 V REM PORCH AREA = 144 3 REM PORCH AREA = 144 SF REM PORCH AREA = 1H SF m rctli 12. g 0.00 6710. tam PI$NEERengineering 0 D GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 00 -ENG -112289 -SHEET -SITE CIVILENGINFERS IANDPLANNERS LANDSIIRVEYORS LANDSCAPEARCFRTECTS (651) 681-1914 tam 1am 8 g f Date 05-17-2013 LEAN AR JEURIS SEN PARCEL 2422 Enterprise Drive Fax: 681-9488 me or under my direct supervision and that I Keith A. Willenbring Designed NAP PRELIMINARY BUILDING PLAN 16305 36TH AVENUE N SUITE 600 OF 15 Mendota Hei hts, MN 55120 g www.pioneemng.com 40.00 Drawn KAW PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 e - e Saw © 2013 Pioneer Engineering N 40.00 4am S 50.00 2600 dd%' 40.00 8.00 n 3200 1FWr 48.00 i17% 4IRNA 8 4O.CG 1WrT MEA 8.0m I'Wi PMRMu n R rmr HMI AIG S n IIleg1 rtA ai ^ FpOi Mll MFA notRR TWT PONT I1EA-x N. amJ rWr HMT NEA n Ram PIMP ANA ^ 2267 a PNrT NFA °i real rt FWi HNr MFA D - Mol 4 a n R 4 h d tw ro 1.oa R rt F = o n 8 2Y14 4 m �_- 4 ___ 20.00 R n 1____- n r--__ $ ^ r -4.0 n r_____ ^ r10.0 �____ - 20.00 n _ 12. 1200 i r_______ I GARAGE 9i GARAGE 10 i8 GARAGE r-____ '� taw n S ro x12508 + o GARAGE n F_--___ GARAGE I.� GARAGE Sl GARAGE N a GMACE S GARAGE n S e.tdR u5 x67 1]33 8 ai a GARAGE 8 17. GMAGE a o m $ a 13.33 i� $ N 6711.54 o n o ry n o r ox67 8 0 1 1 12500- 0 -TwFm- 12.67q 20.00 d 8 X010.50 O.00N 1 ] ri .8) 4 1267 8 14.1 perch 2.48 "20.1] 9.50 0-i 1 4 1 4 9. 0-i 18.04 12 I2n N m.m m porch 2 6710.50 I2n 1267 Wpp porch POrch m0° m 120 N ,� port p0- 8 d b d10.0o o d �.SOo t 8 N 10 6. p m 28. d 2. d 2 9 ST CRUX G - GAPE COD TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 32M SF EGRESS AREA - 54 W NOTE: REAR PORCH AREA = 144 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS LISTED INCLUDES ALL IMPERVIOUS AS SHOWN (PORCH, EGRESS PIT, HOUSE, PORCH, SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY) 4G.GG rmr PNNr MFA f .n aM4R 110.0 IF EGRESS PIT OR PORCH ARE NOT CONSTRUCTED, DEDUCT FROM TOTAL __---- 0 25 50 100 17.50 Im GARAGE m rctli 12. g 0.00 6710. PI$NEERengineering 0 D GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 00 -ENG -112289 -SHEET -SITE CIVILENGINFERS IANDPLANNERS LANDSIIRVEYORS LANDSCAPEARCFRTECTS (651) 681-1914 1 hereby certify that this plan was prepared by Name Revisions Date 05-17-2013 LEAN AR JEURIS SEN PARCEL 2422 Enterprise Drive Fax: 681-9488 me or under my direct supervision and that I Keith A. Willenbring Designed NAP PRELIMINARY BUILDING PLAN 16305 36TH AVENUE N SUITE 600 OF 15 Mendota Hei hts, MN 55120 g www.pioneemng.com am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer State Minnesota Reg. No. 25504 Date 05-17-2013 Drawn KAW PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA under the laws of the of © 2013 Pioneer Engineering // / / / / + + + t + + + yt iA't + +tt"}X X}12`i�\\.'>\-_\ r^',1'`""x ,-2,,,,i -•. -� _ _ / .,. + + + + + of i g ) , . '1'} V /\tI\\t'' `-I 4, t\ \ tt <') \ ,''"3 et ' / ,. ._ c_,.. ` N / / / / + + + + + + + + r*.,d,' S 41,4" } .- + , I , I , t 1 1 I ; I j 1 \\ I i ; J,4 \_, ^ ; / :r -' / ,,./ ' i \ `- I / / / + .+. .+ + ,- +. +. { ) S 4, ( - + I I � i 't t t } 1 , ; t , 1 / f r _ -\ If �' / ,-., + + + + +++ + + -+i '-'i`\-\i,J+(' f- .} + + �' . I �t t`t I� ) y 1i t,.,,._., r^" \ ' i i /tom/ �'k� 1 �; .gyp + '4' i�'"r+ + + i (F/ '//' `i I t` ; - -? I \ `\ + \1- -s �.-_ 7' ;/ i/; j ���j-• + + + + + + A• + + + b,. baa ,J/f `1'f f 1,} I 1' / , \, 0.." / \.,\--,' .1/ ii ///' + + + .{. .,. .{. + 4.4 + + .{- + i+l I i + + It+/ J/!f - �,� `r l \,\ \ \ \'s' /1 �'`f S .'} t c7�' {/,/r , + + + + + + + 4, + + ++� ;. t + i+i +/ // + 1 y ., `\ 1. '1 i vim,_- ; r"y,. kr \tj r: l' j�„_.' ++. .+ + + +' .+ + + ) i 4'�, I+ .+, .i�.-?% , '�`,'r•, t l-. `'_ i ,t ! t rte\ t'`,. '-'! "` \ + + + + + + + + + + + + r IJ+FI + +/� :4' F f""\. \ - }r i !`/ `/r >d / _ \ ) j� , + i + + + �+ ra + \+ .,. .} '4 {'\+ + f" // �i//� a/'` " :`._\ \�\+, i 1 t' a I 1.- r �r J +, + + + a`+ -\--,+n + .+ +%O 1 I \/� +J "/*-I . /1 l S � 1 !^ '\\ � t / /r - J \ r''-' \ - \\ /�-r`\ .;/'` + rt + + + +'t + + '\+ + + 0- + 1'+\� I \ +.,,.. + f r'J%r)j.t }f j i i ,--+\ � '�\ ` J '' Y °h r '' \ ,,/-' \ F' `, - iF, ) /' ! ' ) + i- +. 4- +. + +_,-,.,:+ 1,+ i1 dI' 'b'\+I,lk1.11I .� It r %i\ [ i`' i �1\-.....�- F �'` �r rJ "- \1 i,� aN``. `� ,/! s(1, ;- + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 . + rp 1, 4 + t I n \\ t ,1 , \ � \ ` i -� / ^ 7 ; I 1 1 i + + + , ++,J., , - - +)„ + + + "t,y+\-, (s 11r gg -„G' < l r \ 1 \ f°: F' \'7. /,'I ^\ r , : , + 1 + + + ' + 'P.,.,, '4: (+( + \_ , \ . 7 �-i tt+ / ,., ..,,;,,t"` , , it e i • t,^,.. ' IN \ �""4 4• { \ T \., _ ' \ \%t t { E t r -"d, Y^-+^#,�, +2 St+�$� i 1 11 i.. , \ \ ✓ \ , ,.,.. v. 1. ' i t I^ -i. .i_., n:5 ..+t + } ,r\ i t t 1 i '% /" +Ls% +.._k +':y} +r-tr> r-4^ '�,,_*';.tV+' i;t �t`Jp+� /1 •Oa ,�\\'I. ' �t I � \- _ `?}`` I • _ / } - + y �¢ + i- 1 t.}.1, lis 1,.4. y •? \§ l� \ .: \\ lr rr \> \\'`}t +�'F +.+ + `'F +-'-'+�+�%�`a'$ `-t-' + ..�'-_15 :. i; 1.j.S'`er•--...a"" ,_a•"•".5...,,:w.`:\; '`\\\\(,'i y6 ,..,, // I\ ' \\\��" .,.6{4 '"K" + - d F f../ x SC,i\.,'*. ,''j+ --4,_-<hj "- dY,'i i�c' 1-= .,, •i\. ., ;,\\ \ _.i ;'�r \'� // '\' "'g \ \\\\ S y J V + + ,} fi(+ q¢� '"'++^'-, �' 'rte, r"\`` �''h�"\...'i r,.+`,.-. ✓^�"..�,,/,r.�_ -\-\ \4\ �\ l \ \ 'l ,1 / ^ % , t� \,- ' .\. i. ',!-:+.-' ,,;.r �.� " '",`v •, ,- r"'•+- f/ L 1 -'�'�,"/✓"'"' j' :',.. _'�;'l \\-\i,\ ��-,'.\ .''t. 'b x x iv ' \, I 6 %J' \,+'ry;+,./-#/_r_ ,'='moi -a'-:"'rte' - '�;,�' .4. '.i ''ter \`", \'\N\�\\'-`'7%\ ,xx `y:'�':l'\!?\\ //Ifl \l\\\ r/ �-- ,... r..,.- - rl:..r-Y-.'_"�� :+::- ., "\x\\l,\a tip..'_ - ,\ \, \\ j . !t/ j t\` * r d' \ r \ // - 1 \ '+ "'+/ tri ...- � ..'� � \. \ 1 t•`�: �'y'�// + ,"1. +Y',06 � y:" - 1, "K' + + + �'`(�.`°v.�,�x. A t t / 11 ' { (,: , 7, i ; \ \ \ / - x \ V \t L + .•#"" 'h 1. V \ \ t .i`..✓�%{f • + " ri' ..a-M'�' --'+fes "±- + T 'G Xi, �,._..:' %I_i' ,' \k L"V -Za'4 ,,.4 + + + + '`,.'_'-•.. \ \ \ t\\\', \;F - .,,^ _' `'*%-moi + ° +\� f -+/9 (,} .+ + \'4"a.�i.>S. '� + ''-``` + + +. „1 "\'=.'q"\.i. .. ` \ F%...;" . , \„'- i\, , t ++ -Fl t t + + + + + I ,t_ '+” + + \+ I- + + + +- + + } + i+ + \ + ' i- -i + ' + 1+ i- '+ 1 ii- +z \A 1. i}'. \ A t -f\ 1 , ,,\� r X .,,&r -;---'-T,---'i-,` b-%/ +.i a .,--,. \,., �.,, \ ,C \X\. ay` , t .Ct \ '\ . :.o ` \ ) t 1 q \ i , Y\ `:. r r ✓ 1 +.a>i r ., '.i. , ^>;-.:1'.i�;-� „T.."., r \ , . ��.\ + ,• +' r I. { ) .x; t \ ,, \, i ` .. +. .r' /+r ".+I- "r. }! '"". %„g -. '`-'''%r '*; '- fi u`"' ;✓` -'1'� +..,,, -.. \N \;�-z:-.,\ .� .+. .+ -,,, r.\,'r. `� ..\ ' - i , :-\ a. .:. \ _ _ � + .. 1 + + t \i \ `\+ 44- 1 1 t t 1`'+ ,'i� `, {`; ,",r-, ✓ ' '..,,.k' $-��•t�.,=-' --' Y;r..;,�'+-, /+`" + + \t + +;''#? i+`1 '•'+ '" + \ '\ ' + + + + + ,k~•`�, \""1-: __ �� -.�^. '\, 1� 4tz:VP,,' \. +\ 't + \+'4`r-_ +_.-+ p_+.__ « + + + '.+ + ' 4- 4, + >�� :. + :. + :. +,_ + + ,: .r ! + +5 +'i 'N' ��+ rI + + t' �+ i fi '+ , +, � `o-`, i ` ` ;� 1 1 ; r 5' > "� ",r+� _t�-^f .v\ y..,• ,:'+ P V+ r '\ h + -h t . ,-• -\t i. , h,\`1 t 1 \ ?1 Cr \,.I \ +. \ - t . h / + :. 2 _ t.. 1,. a = « t + :1. �. «{ 1.. ... t +'-t 'S t t \ t , , r"y`� '7�-F-if';' ' �. ,..,4,-%+ %t moi}. F*, +� + +"ro '+° + y , , -it + - r \„`{ \ + + -i- + + 'a" 't-:'w�° `\\ `.4? -i '1p1 ,� 4• \+\ 4 ``�+ +-"' + + +++, «+.\ + . z� _ +:. + `t + :. -f + + j- + � + + +'.. + +Jt + + + j +, " 4 l +" + '+ j+ I + \+`I ) I I -t . ti-, r + �4 \, +// /✓/'/+" -.F„� /' "' ";/� .I 1 J& +o ri { - t' $xr 'i"\. \ `4 R,, , `,"i. t ` \ \`\+\ 1� ,.L . . , \ , ; .i. .. / F« i1 .1. 1 1 i' +? Vii' + . 1 i', t , \ j i t, \ � ';`� 1�\ `'1 '`-/{.'.t. `s'/ ��.' + + n i -F' + + + +`` + \ -I-r .f+ + \-�F nl% n d) `.V'� '+, + + ��1+. \, + + + + + + 1 •. \i-\ I -\ �"k , +.\ \ -P+. \ +\•' I a- +"~i=`- t `\, + ,-r_"--' F .. v..« .I + « T `: + :. + :. + .. + % + 4 + {"+ >`+- .t+' t +' + + f + + N- + %7. 1 4, i -1- 1 `,i +, ;, �1 ✓ ` ;,t I \ t . /, j!/'/S/./,:,,r' 8+-. ,,, \: ti_ Vii+ `;.,.\�.` \. \u�, ,,'`\ \, , \ \'}\ ,:,\t .\. .^. '\ .:r -c' - .1. / ' M. j ' ;"+i 1 / . / /' + 4' + + 'f°'gym + + + + ,%, f+ ate, \ + + 1 ; A .+ ar -k ` r + T f -+ + + , -§` /h✓ ar' eL`-i l ' + i ,1 , \ 'fit" "^- iL ass,€, s. a- / } ,r'f / /:,. ff i %. , .:tr .x y ` . f ', , \ t ti " + `?//y. /, , / `.:- ",., _'.,, rr \\\ ��\`$ �, ..\ ,, `i ,,t,',\\\ \ \ \ \' `_ i' 1 + `•'i `' X't;}3\„`iSt i i a,/�G '',/ -•F '+:. + + t' _+i?'\+"5--r"''++ + + + + + + `+”' *t, '4 + - +xa!!a_, \` \ + + + + + + k) =" {\<+l `, `z: .ItMi +'``l,'`}`\�'\ \t`\\+ `^k + + +\ h \+ + :`.,'1 + ".+ +\\ .:. + t//r +' + t,+ F i ,-f /'+ +J !,F ,.'+ / + `+, �',, S''{-: `<}I',. 1+i, \.' 1I Ii \:j) , ;� i'i'i + C T + iJ t ✓,�,z -1 +- -#--1- ± - .-,.,,- t C' '' t I �� + + ,'t - _ Rtt lis i \ i \,^ a•\ `fi ','. - 't .� � i 1. .y /». `.,< Y \'11 ?. Y' ' ':I 1 i I' ` ` \11 ,�y/ .✓r°` +,-"`Y + + + + ,}�+.� +� + +$-e,+ + + '4 A + + .� "i -"t -k- .yy -� .f +- - 7 3 i,,z', t. \' ' �k +\ +;`Y•.. + \, - + + -.+- , + + + rK + , + A' + +,+ + -� + .li- i +� ; 1 ` , •+- ; ,n ) I .7 -'' I% >- + L 111 '1 .+ ,:. ,. 1% -, :. ''i, i. \" +. °3./-,.. ,.1. 'ia...%` \.:. i + +. _.' ^'�'_..t,•^»! Ez .r I, .f' y �.. .:s �<`i*,; r; is t: tl \ s /r'.,f + 4�.J + + + + +tp/,F ..,i"�. + + ' +. t ', 1 + + .} + `+ ``+tt, + -i- + ;i1 i- moi-`' i\ \ +- `•vk. + + + ,q ! + I t ?A `F+,....,' .. _ - i t + h+ '+ + ..i+r ? + 1 { 4`- / er ` 4> .? y " ....... ' .,,. -� _ ,L," , •, , C.. + 't \ 4 _._.. z .. ': tt.., ... \ ",: ..r' ; t r ,+ f { : ,+ +,'J'+ + + + } -;y�0-,j<� ,.:}a.i`+<\'CA "1'S.t ""'+:` + P 3`. 7N, .r ., -{. (..f./ •. ,+,,,' k:•.\d •i... �: .. `...a„_.,r \, I\\�*I "1K1\ .�'. S( Jf y y ..}} +w` P ii + „a " -Y + + + + + } f \�"§An �,(' +, � ''•+1 is + d\+, . * + + ,}'l\ -,t + + •:•'\"-i r`{'�+"r, x�; ,'. l(..1 t. ' y '^ �. ,.,C=a? . 'T tr "S\ .}, \ .../' -1. «. t :. .:. .,r~- is `` .a j 1 , .afl+ + +='" + . r + + + T + , 4 > _. r„' + t",e'y SNF i t + +' - a + r C ^.,^e',,,.,., y >. 1..,,y ; ; \ \ i:.. \i) a F ;y . 4 !} x , Za ., \ 4 x A 1 ,. \ Z ”, " \ .. • i j I { . 'w kt^, t + + '+ + + i' , + •'i, +. AfvW 2* •. ... ` , - Zg , )- s.'S *\ .1 -9IIII .}„ .,,, ', m-�. -i i.,.,+ �11I� I '... + ¢ \ SL' I .,. ... :. +. -. +. .r .y + _ ..y Y' .z? t + , i,\ .+. .i. fF'^' ro - \ .,•-.+.,...,,'r...,..z e ,,, +`",..., +'? + + + - oa m+ ,� + +. + + ✓ q'& i'` � It— 1.'i + '+' : ,-�,� +\ /:+,., } +, + + + + +p \+1 \., , -;.,z- ::\ - • ,. ^ \ - , '� / ' ,' Ir i i r • _, '.i. "-& a -"_z' `rf",,, +�---.a.,,,. +. + + .} + .« .f .+. 1- .:. I. +. ,Nc, S. i \i1'.i ) .q.i a dt pt. ';i. € + \. - r::. ••• , _ 'I v--� + y L, fit , � R - - '.-=',.'. "' + + d + + + + .{. _ + + +- ----+,- + + ! 4i \'d -i =H'i , t_'-$;`, yi- - i- + + }l i,, .•. ;• + \ �..'-, \` Dob t' -,.',,, _ - / , / , +�, p y y 1I Y + + + +''"'^''' \ '`*+�'^r-i""",-.k.,�.,. `ti ✓'i,f\�:ii+ + + + + + 1-�':-.'S''J V\ �t +} ,-,r,, t,_ 'a + -' + i`? -f; + + + + +i+ -+-�\ f• , �." ` / / ,--/ L + + + + + + ',H- „'M.,,,"xi+"_, +„ `�fz�� +-�..,+ +v".;,$.4 + ,",-+.. `.\ + `:-6, + /S�F,� +C,�^c'�".'-%�4:� + + + + + \b -J + + `i`., `i- + +-� -+.• \. ,� - q + .+ . „ 4. .a. "y .. ,,,{,` '+. + .{. .I. -• <. w._ .... ,iii' +- .r -: +D + 1 X + T t ,.u� :.r I -""'wV A Ai t_ `! f !<,T., .{. i. •'..�.. A `, -�.-. - _ - f i � + + + -s";,.,"ts-'. d'v�-.+-h- } '� + �' i`.' \\\ + +-� + `-.+ \J", +(._i; ++ r�y.!'4 + + + + 'h.'."r+"ti -kr'' + i- +\, +�+ +a �,,.... -y w,...,. .. _ ,,� V"ti ...w-"-"'f"r,, �... r..`....�r.<._,.,u _ .. A ,A \ +V "� y `„ ./„fe,4 , ` .�'.'.�. .,. / 4 z- 4. I. 4 Z `y -,_:i,_,_*-- - _ -+ ' 3--` r---'-z=�-4:-=J'�` � vo-V \ +. .{ +.q;, ,.,. .} -2 ', + + q. .i. .+ ;. .+. + .+. «+ rt S _ v v t V''h ``y-r:f...= -.--' -Y :!- = _..:+,_.-_m;_'3"=_.1_�' `--T�,., \"t\V`'k \.Gr\`, � '+ +'\ , '+ vi," rs-+"fF + .i. .+. i. .+... + .t 55 iII / + :•+`:�_& '--,... .-,tet_:..-" = �+-+-_'•+�' �+.. zk ___±=.��1%f `a ..,� �'�,``. 1+ + + it + + + +' i + + + - + + + + + + rt + ,.eMr�} , ,U;1�' J •••• -?' .1- f-�_:,-::;::: '-_,M"__.+•;-'� �-Y" ��,s.. _'-`"TMS`'„*- Z:` '''--`Z,\ ?\'fin`\\+ + _ .,. .§s 11A t § + y-, y4' : ••• / / + .ma k-_ +w : .'-+- :.� �+,-.,t--_ -�- + "'+., `-+\ �. , I ` `�\ t -k , -{\ `'' . + +? +t �•i + 3 x- + } _ + :. + + . + .,. + ,. + :. + + + + + '-�` cI' v3•• . g._- __ k._ _,._,{--_",k---' Y- +\ + (,`\\:- A`'`+,\ w. ,r.� '! -t "p + + I. .+, 3, .}. q. rte,-,•x+f ° r + �..= .+_ * r+ _-+ _� +-+--,:, �" -4 —+ �'\ \ i ; \ \ , \', \'k " + + _ � a+ ". + _'* + + .:. + + + « + + + + + + 'z4 +..:. + .,. + :. / / +; ..-,�,-„"_,--_.1'_.-.. ",,^-”' ' }t _ j`i_i,F\v'`*'a\ \'1+� \"'' t l,` t 'r I '{ \k \t-\,1 .+ t t -I + + -r •>,+ t + + + + + 1. +. .i. .1. .i. i +. .. + it r i / / + ..-'f`-„ + +` + r+ `'+--+ +- -t'\ 14; Y-+ t'�f,, , , k \t\\ \+? +f + T' , + + N + + + + + + + + + + $ , +k + + + " i 1 c''wr` / ter'---•+,\`�\ \ \ , i t , i 1 t ., t 1 C i `f as fir' } + : .{. .h + +- + -t + T .{.r --.'x 1+ :�� .« + iT / / + -'.s-_...:}:__ -,±---+.-} /+,,-4' ,.. > 'l i {+t t t t;{ 4 , x r\ 'i. ,)t 7 ^ ,� t'I '-. t + • WTLOT C + # ~ + -= - ' + }' + -u � t I f i 41 '. { I A + a-� +{ + 4... ,+' + 42,)_'J"+ + + +�'* + + + :+CP;,;+' ^a/ +_, W, + + + ,, / / .q. ...i-=_'^__- "-.'t --+�, ,t i +`/' +j 4 t ;i¢ I � j i � +:';, iI # % 1 € l' ,' + 1`'.`) r t "++ I +r„ + ` +� '^'�"'• -r t_" +�C If *0,-+'t + t // + +, --k-_±_+ f (d+ ., 4+0}�+k gittIr, -iN 1+a � i+\ +A, +'q: .1 +' tv,�+ F ,+/,y� +} 4 + +'+...+ I i- + .{. 1 +j $ + \ 1 {I ^1 { I i y ; _\ b , i }.,. 1'+i 4. +t '� -I;',,iJ+'�.- +' ti\,' -•.�. �r "\:t ?I + ' 'R f`: t,..\ .+.r .y + g :. , ��i // + +l +++ +l 1+ `\.+'\+i,,' \:`\l 1\+c +£'+ + il- +.+ v� , t>'i .,'+'+K _+ a ' '.P +-+'+ +++ + It', �\: // + +ti t ,y + +.v yyv )v\\ V vAASvvA� + I I.;V ,+:++++ , `I+k +-/s'x 1<yys +� + �� -'. �..+.F++. / / / + \ \�\1F \+ + +'+ + ck -na+` �-.� .` xt+; + + +r + + + +,� \+ �?+ +\\ � \ \\ \ j\ \`\� +\ a. + ° + 5> Vit- . y,A�t. l . '�. 4.+ I c Y om, \ +; « \ \. 'y l r , I 0 s' j \" � r )� .\' )-\\�� NN\\\� r k+\. + / + -- "I- + W,+, _'11,- I� 1� ++ V + ', + ` + + + + ' 't%- r- + + + + + + +\.`\+ +i• / / + '+ �\�', 'i--"'5:. % , \ \ \ h's�i\ Y' r y + . + , ;(. ! o+ + o +'' .+� .I. - `. y \+ � ,� � _ .. / / / + + -rl \+ + f +S' \ \\#�\`'4\\fit \t +`\ + + + 4^14,+. + + + + -+ +, + `+ �r-r.. \' -_`-#;rt -r + < + ,'., +\ + + b \ \ s9 \ \ `,«`+: \ +' + \ r 'r + i t rr Sl . `' \ r + '1 F L ,� /// +.++� ,`gyp a\#rli;\+$+ T'+ +}+i+'++++++a `+1+++41*µ I{``++\4+ +' C` . \,:-__ \ \ + +\\ � +'\P. \ • 'k\ \ _+ + + it- �+/I + + +.__„j•'^ + "+\- + `4n• + � + + - + + +'.jpl i,' � + / / + r\\ \,\ t. \,\,+\\ 4:\ � `�' ��...i, t; 3 a + + `" is :t r .�`_ - ? '� -f- .i r 1'1 ;. ; +\ / .• \ \\+��\,,*\\k\ \\ "r"'a` P`�-,'\ to '+ ?r\'tet �#'`.,+ +: +.:+ .+ .+ + +\+' + r { \ . \` \ t \ \ + r\ \-t *. „\\ �\Mi�`\&. \ W" "T-- \+\ + ,� + + + + Sr "Pw°,'4+, + « , + +i + + is + i_ .. . III 4. \\ +\ +.\\+\`+ .'\,, \ \ + A + +, +++++ + + A -.y-' ,�' t' + ..dr' i ,t� + t + + + `t \ "4 r\ + -+ +--+�`-, + �`-_.,\ +-\ ',,,'I L+\ '� / / / / j� �_le »./` + + .. ,.. \e. '•t' ', \\ " 4.--. '''.`''l' `.,.` ....�._, ",\' `\\.'+-.\.''n, \' \`�. '' _ I1,/ ,a / / / _/ r' + •'-` l 'i + t -- + +/ + + + t s + \i- \ i \ +\_'4 _ ' f `' k ' , 'I I\\ \'A d `-`- ham\ P \,+` r ro/" /" + l -f "_ >- -'+- + ,.'.i`;.+ ,+/ + + + T u+ + \,a� # `i -+t/ } + l+ + X". \' + - +,. +, ' �+ .fit. \\ \,,\`1 \+ \\4'-'-'t \ 3, \+ ` ' 'C \ ``\ ,+ 'e' .. +, .. I. ",I + .. = Ii .r \ _ ` .r' "?. _ 4 i\"„ , ,. +. �., \ + '+\ � i' \ . \l \, \t'', ic, \ .t. , �' '.� -\ Y 1 :'___ - \ \ l \ # / f "` §' �§"--,.-;:_,.-#""' ",..,'" ''", ,rv-> • \ f + +"`} `'tc t _ � 1\'\ \+\`\+'\ \ \ \\ C \': / j \ 1..i' -,---.-fl + /+ j' + + + + + + «+ 4., + -h 'r + '+\ ± +--+--, +.,t < +' +- _*,—'� 't', 'k I\ ,\+\\f' '+, \ \\ y'iA %\ \ } t \ . 'i .;+ r! ,d.\ .+ + �'�\ `C' :\\. k,+r,>- °'-;_,.�,-.A,"�'lz� , x""_} ---+. `I "+-"" � t\.1,\ \ �' \\'\ ` :` \ �i\\i.\ \/ �, \, l l /+ + !+ . +\+ +: +< + ti + \+ +I +v + + \i-_ + +' J. +-_, 4--_ -L__ ' . \\+'` \+'\ k \ ! , -N `{\, t ,,+\\ Y Y / r I (. .__ + + +% + +_ + + + +l r + ! + . + i +/' + + +`- + ,_.. + + + +\ +� \+\'I,'-\+�'\A ",+\ \+\ i, '4 t` I � I + \� ' \ { /` /� I ..+. .+' .§' i+ + + + ,�'is it :✓' ./..,. _ 'i- ---,----r\ -`-'s + a. I+, \+ 4-\ q. tµ'. 1.ki \.,i, \,I l P {f�'� /#_ a I , I + } + + + + + \+ t_+ + / + + + J + + / + + `+-- -e_ __"+ `v ,, +-�'+ +" -r 9- \+ \ \r \.+\ \k\ \{'\ \+t 1 h \ ` \� \ \_\ i. k i N , �_" f+ (». ;. 1 .r _ `+/,_r ...r ./ /'a j -I' _ - -.`` `:'\-.: r, \P., +\ N. \.I. N-+\ \.` \ 1 \ \`\%+\\ \' \+ k \' I !• `~ J j `.'a X ' \+ +';. + + • -k + i i- .*i'_J -+ / + + .i' {. .. + » + » �"-i<-" + - \+ '.� + 47--.{5 . `t-' +� '\ �', k \ :+� \,"1\ \+'\ :.'k� ,\`� i\ t '� \ \ ! 1 ( i +- + .\ .r ` I 4- /;.-' 1+ , ._..1 .+ /+ i / i r S:/ , .q, j/ .+ - 4 \ I -k r � .}',. , + , '':.'S \. `,\� \ T \ v: \,\?\`\ \ ' ` * ; \ J + +, +\ + `+ +!%+ + .} /+ +.j + +,;+4 + `''>+ +.J +, + + >-'i- „ +-1+ `+___ + \+\' +° 'A` `,+\ \�" \\,a +°\+ \}, \�\`\ t� .\j 7 (`-1> . j Y'+ +\ .+ '. .4. /i i f [4- + .k / 1. ,.,..Y' .}' Y. ~�..- .h- -\ 1 ♦ 'i: t \':. \ \ \ \ \\ }, ,"/J� i / I €,+,+ 'K +'+ + +\ + ° + - +....=t + ,i' + ,'+ + \� + t, i 1 J+;'+ `°+ `1,' + +-. -,:. + ti•t\'t. +\ + ` \+,.\ \`, \\,\\ " 'I" '' \r'.'O A `' i / i / t� t r, F+ , q .�\ .1. ', /. ;: « - p t 3 + (`,-., .r I. r . i + \ . 1 t �r \ \ 1 \ tt/S t ' ir ,�/� + , + + + +1 Ay +/ 4- » +- +I- .\I.. r #- + + +j + i` +,r•' .1 " + + :t- +\ + + + \+ + , i1 +\ t+'i i'. it, I,+- \ \ \4 \ `�, 4 �\ ; i t � ( ' . ;:/ I t r + + + .r + Lj.{ 7 a : Vr'' +/ +. ✓ .+ `,,,. .i '",� \.. :A, 'I \+ .4\ ' I \�§\ \' -\ `\'N\ : li \ri, ,\'\ "I ' , ) t � ,' .i ,I :f � i✓,.^+,,,.-+-, +- "+`� 4 1\" + i- + +.... + � r + /� . } :. r + �+ '` \ + +\, + '. .. + \.+ t+ . \+� 't \ * '\ 'k, \+1 \+` .'} I } r.+, \ \ A , , 1 \ k 1 -) k- . �� .}. 11 .+ + +. `:{,. .I ''+ x - +'+' '3 i, y m -, " l+ :t<4 \ � .« i.%y,,_S i=\ F4 ,\ (+ i tt't i. \: , \ i .i y `I; ) {� 7 S i;7 1-. +Nj+ T.L+ +...+ +.,.+ +"-'iS':t._J+"6- 'i1 - ...4 ,-_ +f+/+_-,-,+ + + +`)+»+ \+ +i +, +\ b}` Y i }\. it: t'} l v \ � f M1 ) ` tl II '- \ - i--__ t"\ 7 ,,.,+i"" "1\ -{s..i - .+ +\ I.,. i`+. \ ? "+� }i .. l `+}' •,:j .t, `,t# \: ;}i `t /1t . , #f ( j tl /, + i + .I + + j•-- +- -;-- + -`r- _ -d- '•�1.'+-., .+. + + i-' ' + ~ ^t �.,r. + ... i -F � � `d, - _� + -+ + �+' « + +' /+ ;� �r i4 , } � \ i }.. �% , \ �1 1 \,. ' `�+\ ' i` 4 J K + +, +, .}. : , : ,f/' - r:r - /n. yr' ._ `,,{ :R -V .}. A V+ .. y ifi'A i F 'l N t i \.. t `I i tf .1 q 4 , .y i ,\' \ ,� i,. _. r � f , , t 1 t , l \ \ _. `4 r li + , F i. .i. .I. i. !r i I + y 'Jt a ; .t \;"' "'( `'{ I. + .A i;� `�. \ �{- , is \I r} . i�� ; jrt t +,! �`il } S +^ +\ a-�+ + + + + + ? + + +',+ +, +.:.+ ++I'. + +\+ + \.+\+1 +'+E.+ + +\`n a. t' Y St 'll' j "\ r\. i+. .{. + .y Al - a. ` :.i '�I i :''e I. \ :i .;\ p t. 1 .A. ! t +{ `N-\ ` ;. t �+ t*1 \ +') \ °\ � ty \\\ . i^ s e + \ 11 W"\ -\ + \ , + \A'�'+'\\ �-^ +, �` \ +�-'t c,+ +`\, + + + + T+ a.' + . + i 1. I/ + ,n= II + ,F � -m\7, X x\ '\\'\k\\�%+ \\ i`, \ ""-'a\ \+ }A\�\ 'r--' \',+ -d \+F, + + `• `�*; J-. .-i `f y/.�z .\ x \ \ + \+\ ,I , ,i \ \\ a, .,\\.\ `.\\\\\\ice-,-•�,.. k_`' t. .,. + `\ + + r`T_`f r A +' �� + + j r'.k',r +/- I I" ..+' /= '/ " r/+,<: --.t. ' \ / 1 +.+ k A\ +//-r \ \ \ \ , t. T ( .1, �\ \\.. .;. ,, \ O , P19NEERengineering CIVILENGINEERS L PLANNERS LA SU VEYORS LA SCAPEARCH CFS 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Far: reng.c 88 g www.pioneereng.com © 2013 Pioneer Engineering 1 +t'\ '+ + + ++i I+ / / v\\ + + + `-t>, + +l \ r --1 / } \ �✓A..f J <' )v iv 1 "�A . / ,I - a_-\ �' r / .+ i rlY.l ' ;+ /" /+./ I ,P. ., Ir is + it H- '+ / i \ . '+ `' \}_ __ ,y '- � �' � '�, ., » i r ,; ' !/` �/'/'+'i /'}i �-"�, ,J r"\. -+'J 113/y{ % r t, �' "�. � t ~�\k\\4 / / / \ \\ + �+ +-\\ + + + \i + + + ' / .§i ./ /. I /,t!/ /t „r � ✓ I //+v + ` ,K ,)' 1 j+i ir'+/ i+ ; .- \}'} \ � ...,/ `-k\\ '` '✓,t.\+ \t.\ + -'r + + �'��r 7 I T .''''I%//„'f +/ ],/ + -'/,lr. ,I j+' F'i% i -r� f+ `..`� .�@ ti.. \ _ \ � / \4 \` + + + + +v+ + + + +/ +/'ti (/ ,rt /'III''+ +- t_ -S<//1+ ,r @.-\�.\,.;k_ + ' + \+ + -s/ - /• f ,f �!f .;: ,.7 J« ).. ,�: \f t.:{ -�i r.' /+/ +f � • - .. 'C ?` �V�CvA, k��t +._.�+ + \+ �-,- +_-,..-r +t +. �,_;. l+t-/- ,/ l /-� ,'- I + �:+. t + i�-I; +J i ;+ /,+. •` + + �'.3 + + +�`�-,\ >,i:'+..,'."r d-•\VA\R<. *, <c �- .: `�1-' + Y r. / l J !+i _y + �1\;4i t . ,' . ,, t., j+ \ + o� \ .. 2 / , 'yAv`��.''+' A„S,+ +�+moi++ + �- %'/;'�+'/$: f�+/+ ` t. + fi`i)y`'c,trii_. \+i +�+�+ , �➢}\ `��''' + + $r k I\ \\ + jj,\t\ "-Z \ C.. , / P* '+ , t d \' 1 t "s. 11-� ' j i"'l:'1''~' ``-'tee k-"\."'1 i r+,/-{ + +I, / / / / />i" r ,' I r.. r / + + � \ r 1`+S'1\� � \+`..'"-j '-' l' 'Y i+ + + + +, +\ -i . ;•1 ', ? E 1 `�fI spi i „ 1 , L> %. `, y, % !' jr\ . _.-� j { ; ,.= RETAINING WALL B s10 RETAINING WALL C 900 890 880 910 8 900 900 890 890 880 \ 1 \ \80 870 900 890 880 87 • \ t \\� �r \, ` ( 940 930 930 �_ �•\ �Ss�°��`v� \ v A �� t /� v v V A v V / i 920 �- $ `f f \ E \ \ \ \ \ `v_ / 920 0 2.165 SF 1 \ ` • i %� \ \ 7�t / \ /t \ \ \ \ 1' ' f 910 910 -� \ •\ o \'`_\ n C� y \{ i —0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 ;/ �,'- •'T`- \ \�' \ t, L\ \ \�'\ \\ "1. Oo \ '\ 1 ' yz� ' �/ .rte \ \\ \�� \ •\ , \ I it o � - �-- \.� •_� /ff ; , , _ , - i � i � \ ,'' " �, `-" " � , �` t y t, 2 ' i ', , '',, I � \ i � 1' i 'l a' �\ ya ( �� Y""\N!\£ {( j� ,I r tr r t � I / i '\; li ` � -1, �\ `` t /" �-4' ✓`' �p t f� �..-•--' ' �.,� \... \..\ 1 ` � ;� `y `, \i `1 �\ ; t j ` :..'� ,` t `S \` \` \ i` �a Y� .{} ' j\ , .l� \ "\'\, \ >��'\\\\ \ \-- -��-- \\.�,, J' \ -, ' ' \tI j j ,i , 1 ' , .�,�..- ..� ,' `.� -_� �,,� i �.,. •\, `1 li t �i t \\ �, \ \, l\ \` `� '}`C 1 `i `,, \'' i1 i '` : ` ; } ill ;' �� \ ( ;� ,\ i •_.. .r ' r�`\ _,\ `� t� ;\, , '\ },, �% •OCD \ \ \, \\ \ \,\\ \ \ \\\ \ ' \,` t t4 ,i / i �.,,_�',.� `•y ,,.__ ..� r �i `\ `` M1 t` �, ,` ( -til ,� i\ \� . \ ,ti t it \.� '���T'ti �.\\�'\�'t�-•...\•"�\ \�\1 \'\�\�\l\��s\\\� t `,, \ \\ \\. ,\ >\., fJ x' ,t r ` \� \\ ` fa t' �\ Tti. -h\ �\� " �\, •1x �i^ \� \y \\ � \ 1 �\i ` t , t 1 a \ \ � 1 \ �. �`-•_ �_ _� ._, _.... —.._ _ f' `�-. l 1 � i } ,� � ' ' � ',y li } ', � t \ t 1 � i 1 A\, A,), A�' \ t� EX POND 4 NWL=870.0rit \ J \ A j� `'•'\ ,,,\ \\\ \ ` ! J i 1 I OUTLET=874.6 STOR. VOL.=17.43 ACTT d Q t { W !'- s 1 / , \ 1 25.0 T• i I ; \}a t .• �� rte,. � •• � �. <x A •} > > i} �, i 1 V \ %`` ` �` . , ... \ T• 22. T 32.0 •% 28.0 , _ t `� \., L ' "( \r `'o \, \`.-.,. t , • , ' s9, \`+(—JCS/",, e , \v � � r � `tel �`; �(,`''✓` " �� '"-`rr %� � - �-_� "`' `--- —; ^ -\.: •-�;. • • \,' '; , �`` Ll {— i' Q (� T` �, i � �� i ` •� .. \.:- , �` ,1 K. \ v LF_ , \� 8 4. / BIUMINOUS TRAIL 1 ; s - 25 50 )> 7 100 G ��, CALL, IN FE`PT'- PT CIVE,ENGA'EERS LANDPLANNERS LANDSURVEYORS LAND.SCA ARC ICrS (651) 681-1914 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by Revisions 2422 Enterprise Drive me or under my direct supervision and that I Name Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer Keith A. Willenbting W W W.pioneereng.Com under the laws of the State of Minnesota Reg. No. 25504 Date 05-17-2013 © 2013 Pioneer Engineering �7 `862 \ } I IOUTLOT C lei `1 7 _ O Date 05-17-2013 Designed r r Drawn —0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 —0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 0 V A i J RETAINING WALL A 940 EXISTING GROUND 4' FENCE • \ t \\� �r \, ` ( 940 930 930 �_ �•\ �Ss�°��`v� \ v A �� t /� v v V A v V / i 920 �- $ `f f \ E \ \ \ \ \ `v_ / 920 0 2.165 SF 1 \ ` • i %� \ \ 7�t / \ /t \ \ \ \ 1' ' f 910 910 -� \ •\ o \'`_\ n C� y \{ i —0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 ;/ �,'- •'T`- \ \�' \ t, L\ \ \�'\ \\ "1. Oo \ '\ 1 ' yz� ' �/ .rte \ \\ \�� \ •\ , \ I it o � - �-- \.� •_� /ff ; , , _ , - i � i � \ ,'' " �, `-" " � , �` t y t, 2 ' i ', , '',, I � \ i � 1' i 'l a' �\ ya ( �� Y""\N!\£ {( j� ,I r tr r t � I / i '\; li ` � -1, �\ `` t /" �-4' ✓`' �p t f� �..-•--' ' �.,� \... \..\ 1 ` � ;� `y `, \i `1 �\ ; t j ` :..'� ,` t `S \` \` \ i` �a Y� .{} ' j\ , .l� \ "\'\, \ >��'\\\\ \ \-- -��-- \\.�,, J' \ -, ' ' \tI j j ,i , 1 ' , .�,�..- ..� ,' `.� -_� �,,� i �.,. •\, `1 li t �i t \\ �, \ \, l\ \` `� '}`C 1 `i `,, \'' i1 i '` : ` ; } ill ;' �� \ ( ;� ,\ i •_.. .r ' r�`\ _,\ `� t� ;\, , '\ },, �% •OCD \ \ \, \\ \ \,\\ \ \ \\\ \ ' \,` t t4 ,i / i �.,,_�',.� `•y ,,.__ ..� r �i `\ `` M1 t` �, ,` ( -til ,� i\ \� . \ ,ti t it \.� '���T'ti �.\\�'\�'t�-•...\•"�\ \�\1 \'\�\�\l\��s\\\� t `,, \ \\ \\. ,\ >\., fJ x' ,t r ` \� \\ ` fa t' �\ Tti. -h\ �\� " �\, •1x �i^ \� \y \\ � \ 1 �\i ` t , t 1 a \ \ � 1 \ �. �`-•_ �_ _� ._, _.... —.._ _ f' `�-. l 1 � i } ,� � ' ' � ',y li } ', � t \ t 1 � i 1 A\, A,), A�' \ t� EX POND 4 NWL=870.0rit \ J \ A j� `'•'\ ,,,\ \\\ \ ` ! J i 1 I OUTLET=874.6 STOR. VOL.=17.43 ACTT d Q t { W !'- s 1 / , \ 1 25.0 T• i I ; \}a t .• �� rte,. � •• � �. <x A •} > > i} �, i 1 V \ %`` ` �` . , ... \ T• 22. T 32.0 •% 28.0 , _ t `� \., L ' "( \r `'o \, \`.-.,. t , • , ' s9, \`+(—JCS/",, e , \v � � r � `tel �`; �(,`''✓` " �� '"-`rr %� � - �-_� "`' `--- —; ^ -\.: •-�;. • • \,' '; , �`` Ll {— i' Q (� T` �, i � �� i ` •� .. \.:- , �` ,1 K. \ v LF_ , \� 8 4. / BIUMINOUS TRAIL 1 ; s - 25 50 )> 7 100 G ��, CALL, IN FE`PT'- PT CIVE,ENGA'EERS LANDPLANNERS LANDSURVEYORS LAND.SCA ARC ICrS (651) 681-1914 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by Revisions 2422 Enterprise Drive me or under my direct supervision and that I Name Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 681-9488 am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer Keith A. Willenbting W W W.pioneereng.Com under the laws of the State of Minnesota Reg. No. 25504 Date 05-17-2013 © 2013 Pioneer Engineering �7 `862 \ } I IOUTLOT C lei `1 7 _ O Date 05-17-2013 Designed NAP Drawn KAW A6.5- G A f� �.. 00 H.P. } �48 14w 7-&M -a3 = ..._ W0 ,— 7075 -- T. 96,5 T. 95 B: 93.5 95.5 B. .5 \, 1� �V R\\ \ \G R G 95.3 ,.9 •5 w \ � 1 94.3 Im G PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN �I\ H.P_ 3+00 0 8 94 92 .59 LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE N SUITE 600 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 1 .0 / J- O r 1 OWL E88i6 JEURISSEN PARCEL CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA I� 7 OF 15 © 2013 Pioneer Engineering 65' q DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT LOWEST OPENING ELEVATION LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION GROUND ELEVATION ® BUILDING RECOMMENDED GARAGE SIDE FINISHED ELEVATION ® LOT CORNER 29.0 - r� 3' _ TYPICAL POND SECTION 3 BERM 3 BLOCK NO. I 7 1 � 1 LOT NO. I "31.0 0:1 HOUSE TYPES R ---- -NWL -----10:1 I LF=928.0 3Uj 3 z z2,3.0'PROPOSED ENTRY WALKOUT R FINISHED GRADE I w z; _ WO -RAMBLER 1 1 LO zi 10' j 10' =1 __ SWO -SIDE BOTTOM G 937.0 INSTALL MNDOT CATAGORY 2 L EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ji VARIES ON DITCH SLOPES & BERM 65' q DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT LOWEST OPENING ELEVATION LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION GROUND ELEVATION ® BUILDING RECOMMENDED GARAGE SIDE FINISHED ELEVATION ® LOT CORNER 29.0 - r� - 28.0 25' 35'25' I O I BLOCK NO. I 7 I I LOT NO. I "31.0 25' 35' HOUSE TYPES R RAMBLER OR SPLIT ENTRY w, zi I LF=928.0 LO -RAMBLER LOOKOUT OR SPLIT z z2,3.0'PROPOSED ENTRY WALKOUT R FINISHED GRADE I w z; _ WO -RAMBLER WALKOUT LO zi SLO -SIDE LOOKOUT =1 __ SWO -SIDE WALKOUT G 937.0 I O L I O O STREET LOT INFORMATION (TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE) SELECT BACKFILL) �� �/� LIMIT OF SUBGRADE EXCAVATION MATERIAL SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL N U S.Wp,OYAP�F�\ COMPACTED BACKFILL ?0 RF?� NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL MAX. COMPACTED BACKFILL 3.0' MAX COMPACTED BACKFILL to. 10.0' MIN. BOTTOM OF U STAB E MATERIAL SUBGRADE CORRECTION DETAIL NO SCALE PI $NEERengineering CIVML GINFF.RS LANDPLAN S LANDSURVEYORS LANDSCA ARCH Cr9 2422 Enterprise Drive (6 681-1914 Fa(651) x:x: 681-9488 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 www.pioncereng.com © 2013 Pioneer Engineering LOT PROFILE .. DIRE077ON OF FLOW; .. _ STREET PROFlLL:'..:: ... .. -. DIRECTION OF FLOW ON S 111F 0. 0. 0.5' LOT BENCHING DETAIL NO SCALE PHASE SEQUENCE 1. THE SIZE OF EACH FILL OPERATION WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE QUANTITY OF SOIL IMPORT, 2. EACH PHASE WILL CONSIST OF THE GRADING SEQUENCE OUTLINED BELOW. GRADING SEQUENCE 1. DETERMINE SIZE OF FILL AREA BASED ON AVAILABLE SOIL 2. INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3. INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (SILT FENCE). 4. STRIP TOPSOIL, STOCKPILE AND STABILIZE IN BERM FOR FUTURE SPREADING. 5. DIG TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, BASIN TO BE 1800 CF/ACRE OF AREA STRIPPED. CLEAN TEMP BASIN ONCE 50% FULL. 6. ALL SOIL WILL BE TESTED FOR SUITABILITY FOR FILL PER THE BORROW PIT RECLAMATION PROTOCOL PRIOR TO BEING BROUGHT ONSITE. 7. ALL SOILS WILL BE COMPACTED PER THE BORROW PIT RECLAMATION PROTOCOL. 8. MAINTAIN DRAINAGE DURING GRADING OPERATION TO TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN. 9. COMPLETE SITE GRADING PER PLAN. 10. RESPREAD TOPSOIL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 4" DEPTH. 11. MAINTAIN DRAINAGE TO TEMP SEDIMENT BASIN UNTIL NEXT PHASE BEGINS. 12. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES WITHIN TIME FRAME LISTED IN EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO ADHERE TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT, INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENT TO MINIMIZE THE AREA DISTURBED BY GRADING AT ANY GIVEN TIME AND TO COMPLETE TURF RESTORATION THE TIME REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT AFTER COMPLETION OF 2. A COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 3. BMP'S REFER TO EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES DEFINED IN THE MPCA PROTECTING WATER QUALITY IN URBAN AREAS AND THE MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING HANDBOOK. 4. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP'S) SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES. SOME EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS CHECK DAMS AND TEMPORARY SILT PONDS MAY BE INSTALLED AS GRADING OCCURS IN THE SPECIFIC AREA. THEY SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 5. THE BMP'S SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE PERMITTEE SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT MORE BMP'S WILL BE NECESSARY TO ENSURE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ON THE SITE. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT IS THE RESPONSIBRITY OF THE PERMITEE TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND/OR CLIMATIC EVENTS AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BMP'S OVER AND ABOVE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS THAT MAY BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES. 6. ALL TREES NOT LISTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED. DO NOT OPERATE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE DRIP LINE, ROOT ZONES OR WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE AREAS. 7. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES, GRASS AND OTHER VEGETATIVE COVER TO HELP FILTER RUNOFF. 8. OPERATE TRACK EQUIPMENT (DOZER) UP AND DOWN EXPOSED SOIL SLOPES ON FINAL PASS, LEAVING TRACK GROOVES PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. DO NOT BACK- BLADE. LEAVE A SURFACE ROUGH TO MINIMIZE EROSION. 9. TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT 2575 & 387,; CONSISTING OF: • MNDOT MIX 150 0 40 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL. • MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 3 0 2 TONS PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL AND DISK ANCHORED IN PLACE OR APPROVED EQUAL, INSTALLED TO MINIMUM 90% COVERAGE OF THE SURFACE AREA DISTURBED. • TYPE 1 FERTILIZER, 10-10-20 0 200 LBS. PER ACRE 10. PERMANENT TURF RESTORATION SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 & 3876 CONSISTING OF: • MNDOT MIXTURE 240 AT 75 POUNDS PER ACRE. • MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 3 0 2 TONS PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL AND DISK ANCHORED IN PLACE OR APPROVED EQUAL, INSTALLED TO MINIMUM 90% COVERAGE OF THE SURFACE AREA DISTURBED.MULCH AT 90 % COVERAGE WITH DISC ANCHOR. • TYPE 3 FERTILIZER, 22-5-10 80%W.I.N 0 350 LBS PER ACRE. 11. SLOPES AT 3:1 OR STEEPER, AND/OR WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE SEEDED AND HAVE AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TYPE 3 INSTALLED OR MAY BE HYDROSEEDED WITH TACKIFER MULCH. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS. 13. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. 14. WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF THE SITE GRADING OPERATIONS THE ENTIRE SITE (EXCEPT ROADWAYS) SHALL HAVE BEEN SEEDED AND MULCHED AND SILT FENCE SHALL INSTALLED AROUND ALL PONDS. 15. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS A. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED (E.G. WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. 2. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF A SURFACE WATER OR ANY STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WHICH IS CONNECTED TO A SURFACE WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS (STEEPER THAN 3:1 SLOPES), 14- DAYS (10:1 TO 3:1 SLOPES), OR 21 DAYS (FLATTER THAN 10:1). THESE AREAS INCLUDE POND SIDE SLOPES, EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A POSITIVE SLOPE TO A CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEM, STORM SEWER INLET, DRAINAGE DITCH, OR OTHER SYSTEM THAT DISCHARGES TO A SURFACE WATER. 3. THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY DRAINAGE DITCH MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE TO ANY SURFACE WATER (WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER). 4. PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY. OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. B. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES 1. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT ENTERING SURFACE WATERS. DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. IF DOWN GRADE SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED, ADDITIONAL UPGRADE PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED, AND THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED. THERE SHALL BE NO UNBROKEN SLOPE LENGTH OF GREATER THAN 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITH A GRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER. SLOPES MAY BE BROKEN WITH SILT FENCE, ROCK CHECK DAMS, COMPOST SNAKES, OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS AND/OR AS SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 2. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON DOWNGRADE PERIMETERS BEFORE UPGRADE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. 3. THE TIMING OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT TERM ACTIVITIES. HOWEVER, THESE PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 4. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS BY APPROPRIATE BMP'S DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. 5. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORM WATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS OR DITCHES. 6. CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY (OR PERMANENT) SEDIMENTATION BASINS WHERE TEN OR MORE ACRES OF DISTURBED SOIL DRAIN TO A COMMON LOCATION AND/OR AS SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. C. DEWATERING AND SURFACE DRAINAGE 1. DEWATERING OR ANY TYPE OF SURFACE DRAINAGE THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER OR DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIP RAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEETING, OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. 2. ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING MUST BE DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS, EROSION, OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. D. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE 1. THE CONTRACTOR MUST APPOINT SOMEONE TO INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. ALL INSPECTIONS MUST BE RECORDED IN WRITING AND RETAINED PER M.P.C.A. N.P.D.E.S. REQUIREMENTS. (NOTE: LOCAL JURISDICTION MAY REQUIRE A MORE FREQUENT INTERVAL OF INSPECTION.) E. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES 1. SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PER M.P.C.A. REQUIREMENTS. 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST BE STORED AND DISPOSED OF PER M.P.C.A. REGULATIONS. 3. EXTERNAL WASHING OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. NO ENGINE DECREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE, 0.5" TOPSOIL 25' 25' 35'25' 25' NG GRADEARIES 60' 25' 35' F SETBACKS w, zi zz R I z z2,3.0'PROPOSED R FINISHED GRADE I w z; _ ZD1FINISHED GRADE > zi RLM Single Family Lots Z3 =1 __ FINISHED GRADE ; i IS GRADE O O GRADING GRADE O O SELECT BACKFILL) �� �/� LIMIT OF SUBGRADE EXCAVATION MATERIAL SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL N U S.Wp,OYAP�F�\ COMPACTED BACKFILL ?0 RF?� NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL MAX. COMPACTED BACKFILL 3.0' MAX COMPACTED BACKFILL to. 10.0' MIN. BOTTOM OF U STAB E MATERIAL SUBGRADE CORRECTION DETAIL NO SCALE PI $NEERengineering CIVML GINFF.RS LANDPLAN S LANDSURVEYORS LANDSCA ARCH Cr9 2422 Enterprise Drive (6 681-1914 Fa(651) x:x: 681-9488 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 www.pioncereng.com © 2013 Pioneer Engineering LOT PROFILE .. DIRE077ON OF FLOW; .. _ STREET PROFlLL:'..:: ... .. -. DIRECTION OF FLOW ON S 111F 0. 0. 0.5' LOT BENCHING DETAIL NO SCALE PHASE SEQUENCE 1. THE SIZE OF EACH FILL OPERATION WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE QUANTITY OF SOIL IMPORT, 2. EACH PHASE WILL CONSIST OF THE GRADING SEQUENCE OUTLINED BELOW. GRADING SEQUENCE 1. DETERMINE SIZE OF FILL AREA BASED ON AVAILABLE SOIL 2. INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3. INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (SILT FENCE). 4. STRIP TOPSOIL, STOCKPILE AND STABILIZE IN BERM FOR FUTURE SPREADING. 5. DIG TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, BASIN TO BE 1800 CF/ACRE OF AREA STRIPPED. CLEAN TEMP BASIN ONCE 50% FULL. 6. ALL SOIL WILL BE TESTED FOR SUITABILITY FOR FILL PER THE BORROW PIT RECLAMATION PROTOCOL PRIOR TO BEING BROUGHT ONSITE. 7. ALL SOILS WILL BE COMPACTED PER THE BORROW PIT RECLAMATION PROTOCOL. 8. MAINTAIN DRAINAGE DURING GRADING OPERATION TO TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN. 9. COMPLETE SITE GRADING PER PLAN. 10. RESPREAD TOPSOIL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 4" DEPTH. 11. MAINTAIN DRAINAGE TO TEMP SEDIMENT BASIN UNTIL NEXT PHASE BEGINS. 12. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES WITHIN TIME FRAME LISTED IN EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO ADHERE TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT, INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENT TO MINIMIZE THE AREA DISTURBED BY GRADING AT ANY GIVEN TIME AND TO COMPLETE TURF RESTORATION THE TIME REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT AFTER COMPLETION OF 2. A COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 3. BMP'S REFER TO EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES DEFINED IN THE MPCA PROTECTING WATER QUALITY IN URBAN AREAS AND THE MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING HANDBOOK. 4. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP'S) SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES. SOME EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS CHECK DAMS AND TEMPORARY SILT PONDS MAY BE INSTALLED AS GRADING OCCURS IN THE SPECIFIC AREA. THEY SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 5. THE BMP'S SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE PERMITTEE SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT MORE BMP'S WILL BE NECESSARY TO ENSURE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ON THE SITE. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT IS THE RESPONSIBRITY OF THE PERMITEE TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND/OR CLIMATIC EVENTS AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BMP'S OVER AND ABOVE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS THAT MAY BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES. 6. ALL TREES NOT LISTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED. DO NOT OPERATE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE DRIP LINE, ROOT ZONES OR WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE AREAS. 7. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES, GRASS AND OTHER VEGETATIVE COVER TO HELP FILTER RUNOFF. 8. OPERATE TRACK EQUIPMENT (DOZER) UP AND DOWN EXPOSED SOIL SLOPES ON FINAL PASS, LEAVING TRACK GROOVES PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. DO NOT BACK- BLADE. LEAVE A SURFACE ROUGH TO MINIMIZE EROSION. 9. TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT 2575 & 387,; CONSISTING OF: • MNDOT MIX 150 0 40 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL. • MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 3 0 2 TONS PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL AND DISK ANCHORED IN PLACE OR APPROVED EQUAL, INSTALLED TO MINIMUM 90% COVERAGE OF THE SURFACE AREA DISTURBED. • TYPE 1 FERTILIZER, 10-10-20 0 200 LBS. PER ACRE 10. PERMANENT TURF RESTORATION SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 & 3876 CONSISTING OF: • MNDOT MIXTURE 240 AT 75 POUNDS PER ACRE. • MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 3 0 2 TONS PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL AND DISK ANCHORED IN PLACE OR APPROVED EQUAL, INSTALLED TO MINIMUM 90% COVERAGE OF THE SURFACE AREA DISTURBED.MULCH AT 90 % COVERAGE WITH DISC ANCHOR. • TYPE 3 FERTILIZER, 22-5-10 80%W.I.N 0 350 LBS PER ACRE. 11. SLOPES AT 3:1 OR STEEPER, AND/OR WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE SEEDED AND HAVE AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TYPE 3 INSTALLED OR MAY BE HYDROSEEDED WITH TACKIFER MULCH. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS. 13. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. 14. WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF THE SITE GRADING OPERATIONS THE ENTIRE SITE (EXCEPT ROADWAYS) SHALL HAVE BEEN SEEDED AND MULCHED AND SILT FENCE SHALL INSTALLED AROUND ALL PONDS. 15. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS A. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED (E.G. WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. 2. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF A SURFACE WATER OR ANY STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WHICH IS CONNECTED TO A SURFACE WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS (STEEPER THAN 3:1 SLOPES), 14- DAYS (10:1 TO 3:1 SLOPES), OR 21 DAYS (FLATTER THAN 10:1). THESE AREAS INCLUDE POND SIDE SLOPES, EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A POSITIVE SLOPE TO A CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEM, STORM SEWER INLET, DRAINAGE DITCH, OR OTHER SYSTEM THAT DISCHARGES TO A SURFACE WATER. 3. THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY DRAINAGE DITCH MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE TO ANY SURFACE WATER (WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER). 4. PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY. OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. B. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES 1. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT ENTERING SURFACE WATERS. DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. IF DOWN GRADE SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED, ADDITIONAL UPGRADE PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED, AND THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED. THERE SHALL BE NO UNBROKEN SLOPE LENGTH OF GREATER THAN 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITH A GRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER. SLOPES MAY BE BROKEN WITH SILT FENCE, ROCK CHECK DAMS, COMPOST SNAKES, OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS AND/OR AS SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 2. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON DOWNGRADE PERIMETERS BEFORE UPGRADE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. 3. THE TIMING OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT TERM ACTIVITIES. HOWEVER, THESE PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 4. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS BY APPROPRIATE BMP'S DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. 5. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORM WATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS OR DITCHES. 6. CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY (OR PERMANENT) SEDIMENTATION BASINS WHERE TEN OR MORE ACRES OF DISTURBED SOIL DRAIN TO A COMMON LOCATION AND/OR AS SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. C. DEWATERING AND SURFACE DRAINAGE 1. DEWATERING OR ANY TYPE OF SURFACE DRAINAGE THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER OR DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIP RAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEETING, OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. 2. ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING MUST BE DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS, EROSION, OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. D. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE 1. THE CONTRACTOR MUST APPOINT SOMEONE TO INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. ALL INSPECTIONS MUST BE RECORDED IN WRITING AND RETAINED PER M.P.C.A. N.P.D.E.S. REQUIREMENTS. (NOTE: LOCAL JURISDICTION MAY REQUIRE A MORE FREQUENT INTERVAL OF INSPECTION.) E. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES 1. SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PER M.P.C.A. REQUIREMENTS. 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST BE STORED AND DISPOSED OF PER M.P.C.A. REGULATIONS. 3. EXTERNAL WASHING OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. NO ENGINE DECREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE, 25' 25' 35'25' 25' 60' 25' 35' F SETBACKS w, zi SETBACK (MIN.) R I w, z. SETBACK R FINISHED GRADE I w z; _ SETBACK (MIN.) RLM Single Family Lots SINGLE :J FINISHED GRADE ; i �I (MIN.) GRADING GRADE �j 001 Front: �I LC GRADING GRADE 3I of R WO Garage foundation to R -O -W =25 FAMILY LOTS i �' 10' 0 0 10 I 10' o House foundation to R -O -W =25 10 5' I 0.5' TOPSOIL o RE -SPREAD I 10' 00 1 Side =5' -Garage 10' -Building HOLD DOWN 10' 0.5' TOPSOIL------ ------ - -------------- ------ - `r? 0.5' TOPSOILI Rear=25' Min., 40' Bluff overlay/Wetlands AND rn - - RE -SPREAD 00 `� `-__ RE -SPREAD Min Area: 474 SET BACKS li�Lot 2.5' HOLD Area =9,000 SF 2.67' HOLD 3.0' HOLD DOWN Lot Width: BASEMENT FLOOR DOWN BASEMENT FLOOR DOWN BASEMENT FLOOR Lot Width =75', 90' Shoreland Overlay LOOKOUT RAMBLER WALKOUT Max Building Coverage=35% (TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE) (TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE) (TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE) SETBACKS 25 35' 37' R 25' 72' R w 25' SETBACK 35' 37' R Twin Homes TWIN HOMES w, z' SETBACK (MIN.) I UJI zl SETBACK FINISHED GRADE I z; JI (MIN.) I Front: FAMILY LOTS � �I FINISHED GRADING GRADE ; GRADE l �; (PAIN.) GRADE I 3; oI ' Garage foundation to R -O -W =25 0 LO 0 D=, 0 WO House foundation to R -O -W =25 HOLD DOWN �I n 10' S' i �� 10' n o AGRADING I 0.5 TOPSOILAND I 10, o i Rear=25' Next to State ROW RE -SPREAD I ------- - 10' 00 Min Area: 10' 0.5' TOPSOILI `�? oSET 0.5 TOPSOILI Lot Area =7,260 SF Average BACKSRE-SPREAD 00 > RE -SPREAD _ ---- Lot Width: Lot Width =50' 2.5' HOLD 3.0' HOLD 2.00' HOLD 7 DOWN BASEMENT FLOOR DOWN LOOKOUT BASEMENT FLOOR DOWN BASEMENT FLOOR WALKOUT RAMBLER (TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE) TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE (TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE) ::-I- ,,, , , I I " I , � - � \ 1 i ."- , I -- '� --- ,- 11 I 1.1.�11��. � � � )!f1j, Y -1 I , � I k \ ,\\'' I I I I I . .1 11 ,- \ ". \- f - 1161 11� 1-1/ I ,,, I/ I .1 " ; j \ Ni - NL - k " � j; ; , ,-, -T".. � k 1% - , 1� I- � I \- f?\UNk f -f I //�'Y,Ilf 1 , /--- 'N I - I . . , I t , ! , ; , , IN 1 1 � I 'N, ir -�` /"./, 1 ; . , 1, " 1\ . I ... I I 11 )J� % \ f /, I , � - ---- . I I , , , � , , ,�-, I \ � - I I / `� ,•� , I, 0 \,�r ? ,/"/ #) 1 � ` N ,-%,. A-\ "I I 1 ,4 1 � /, \ I ei, * - **..-;, - I . " I -- I<' � n ,� , ,,� I . I k � I., - 11 I/ ... I - ,V .1 11 , \ 1--, N, 4, ", I V -�, �� `k". ,�,i / J, I I , � I " `� . .�. I i , f ) AA`- \ ,-,. "I' - , , I I ) I i -i - I - ­� - I .. 11 � \ I � � 1. �, \ �, -,,- ,-� 1 / I I \, N-�_--- .t ,,, � . ". ---- IN' - � , 1 P)l f / -1 I I \ - N,.I ,/- -, ) � I , ( ,-N-�? I. I )15 \ -) ,I e ,\ I I UN, N, i I I f I i*,I' \ " ,/-��, � . � � : I .. \ \ N, \ , f I r 11 � . , t, ,,f) //I----,-- � ) 'k ,,, � 5 , I .. I', . . � if r -j I j Imo- '. I , 1 11 � j j I - �� 11 .. x"13 �. 1, , �) T.A(,-�-f � � k ) j I I I ! I f fIl /!!°",_-....-', ) , , --,- -�� I . . .� ,,,, \ ,,-, f'-- \ -k, ; I Z- � - - , �\ \ t -f,-4 � "^, -- 5; I%,< . \ \ Z�,, -�3.�_\\ � �� , , - - � - I I I 1 , ; f I / -, ,- ,- . I I -,,_ � ,�� , ,,, , ,- �� - ky - " )- T, ?I - 1� - -'i- - I - ,,Z N '�. r-- ,I s - ,:7,,.;;�� N"', "�, '. , I - I I X-1 , e , il 3 1 I '--- -- , - . " \ - 0 \-I-. -N,\." � -� P ,� ;twl�--, , - , - .... -4,,,-� I- ",-`,,�I `:\\\\ "!�', � � - --` ,- �� ,\- . II- - -IJ I -- - - , - \ k � -/ � :, , , \ il�lt / �III --- III` ,��,, - " -�-Z��' \\ I, lif , " - - -1 - � I- -,k� I •� - - I , , , 1c, q/ , 11.-1\ - ��, "'..6c 5- V ,jv-�, j ,-,-_,;:::�,,Z�7�:;",:;- . - 1-,� 1��, - 1�I - ,-I �-, -:�, I-- --*�r- 0�11- I� ly I.; - -AAV - """', ��,-;� 1- ,� -r,L�57:::,�Z,��:�-f:I- ---7;,--,---I` - I- , 11 ,-,--, �-\ \, -i�\\' - 11 ` I - . , 3-100Z� XIN .\I-N,� �/-,�1, -��;�� I-e""'"�-:-I>��-. ---�-:�-,- :�,---. :; .... -- - - I- -�'--,_I- -k�\\,, - I \� %, - / I -I.,, -i-- - I I... ;- I- �- I I , , - ,- � I � -1 -;, I -� - I-, I I �;7 , I,_, , �-- _---I_ ----- -- ---N �' - - - ; i i 1, I . 1, 'I, I .1 -, --1 I \ I,, IN \ I \- '. - -- --1- -�,-//-1- " ,- ,` --`1 i I "; , j ' I - - 1, .-- I � A- I ,�'N, � " �� I -, I - ,� - -,�\� I -1 ". - , ­ I \ " I ,------, -1� '� \.,-" - 'N , -� I.I` , , 11 - - '.-•"'../ �` , -,-, 1.11 -, �- 'N 4 .-.. I , - , -�,1, I , F ..., -1 , -) I, III , - ,- ---- I - -------- - - 'N \ \ 11 I \ -- , - - -IN I N I �, �, - I I ;--r�, 4/ �)/ --�--,`N I --,-.-I I-- III -- --- . � -I- -- / -,-- -\ �1\ N, 11, I -I I ..... .... � I -1, I "-, - I I " ,,---..\ \ \,\ \"\-, N- , N. \1 I I I `\ \ I - � 4, //I-" 1-' I '- -,Lf.---- - -- , , \ , ­- " �, - - , --- I 1� , N, -� I, - - I -11 1-1 >��, \ N,\ ,- � , , �N -�\\1\,)i\ I " � , 1, I \ " \ - �� / - / �-I"'-- I,--- -, I � , - -1 11 -� 'Ili I.," ,-.. -- `>_., N.- i I ! I -- - N--- I , 1, 1, 1,•\ NN �, \� I \ I I I 11 < �,� ,,, , ,,,, I I- .., ', If I-, �,,� / III11 I I "'I.- - \ - \ INNN,' NN N, 'N � �� � �,, N " <%`t,,. , � ..-.. - .,V (I; 11 , � \ , 1, \ ,,,, � � � '� 11 ... I" - �, \ 1, " 1, , I , I , \ 1\, - " , � I IN / ,- -I I♦ ,,,� , - I I , N e ) �\ I I / , -- / -- ---- I I " � I" � �- - --- -- , �/ 11 I I / / � I - I , . ,,, \ 1. , I ... 11- -.11 -\ \ %\ ", ,,, I " I \ I I ; I / 1. - , � ".. �`��I - �.--- - 11, \ \- N, >,',.\ N NN � , N' N, , , , ., �, I ; 1, --� _, IN, / -- ; " , \ � - \ \" � , 1 ;=�� . . ..... u1, I I -- -, 1% , I� , \ \ , , , % � , , . , I / \ " " I , i , / -- - '^.o -1 - I I `VA -,V... 1 "- � -- \ - I -.`- \ I - I ',-- N I , \ ; IN ') I " "I fi / I I I ! I , , I/ / -\ \ <1 " , , 11 - I , '� I,, - , ) 11 -- _- -.- - '- , " \ \ \ I N, N, I I ", I . I , � \ I , % � � iN N . �-, - -(,� 1',\ 'N - > 'f, , / I j I/ - r, \ "N. % -- -.-� --,� -- -- -� , , ", 'N \ I � '! S \ IN -\ "I . . . . I . I -� I I �, " I I I i i , 1. ; I 1, 1� - I I , , I I , \, \, \ '� , \ N \ \ I I I ) I -- // � / N i" F- -- ,---.-.-.-,-- - , : k I i I , � . ., 1 � "i -- "s N, i" / I . `N - / N I , , 1 , I I I / � : N\ N, , �, .... I - \ N, \ � \, " '\ \ , , \ \ �, I I I �--/ - I I I "I I ,f � ( - � �- I-- - - � . . I I i ; ; ; / / I I- / �, ":,, � , 1-- ----, --N, N, ,\ \, Nl- \ \ , \ , , ,I N� .,\1 N . " " N � I (I i ' 1- � -,-\-,5' . , I t/-( I I " ---..� -111,11, � . I I �, " -N N, N, N \ " , � , N ) , I . I 11 -. j / % I I , \ k " 1, N, , k !:= ), �. I �/ i I ( i I r I. -- -- -- -- IN \ N, "", I � � I.' f) Q I , ', I / ) , � � � I i � , � I 11 :1 I I / -� - -\ � 1. \ , N \, \ \, \ \ ", " \ \ � � I , \'. N. - . -- \ , ,- " ; , I`-, , � . \ \ % N, , , If ' � � f , , / . ( / I - " ./ , � / , I - / vim,../I/ ;� I I � �, \ "N \ \ N, \ iN -\ % , , , f ; . I ; . r 1�� - 'I' , -� I ,,, f ; 1 i � � I \1 : I . I -. - -11 � �, - � � - - I � I I i, I / - -- - - -- - -1 1, \ \ \- ,N % ", \,\,\ � \ \ \ , - , ,\ , . '1\. ti:i L I N� - / ;-� k, z ... I � J, -- I I I I IN, - / / I/ / � 1. I � � \ -� -, \ \\ " , ',\ ii � t ( 1) ZZ, � ; � � i , � i .I,-- -..I- --- - -� � -- � \-,-� � N, I I I I � � � " I � \-, / , � I,,1 " I / � I; '\ I 1, , N. 'N \ 'N " ,\ NN\ \ 'VAS , ( 0 -, , t , 1 � N I -1 1i . I - - ,� _I/ , I /, - ", �1, �, N � I I I - , I N, N I 4 / -1 1, . ; I/ \ N, - � � ! I " I I \ N, , � N, N \ , t I , ( r� / ,,, , I �� \ , \ \ I \ � (� 'I-1 .... / / � 1. / , --� \ "I \ , N , " I \ , , \\\ , � N, , NN, \ k ; \ ! 11 ,-:1 A " ,�, -, " , I 1, I ,\ N% �, , 1 1 . I N I I `'.^--,e\. �, N, , -, \ \ \\� N, \N, Nki \ \ \�\\ NN\ , I N 1> I I - , I , \ '. I 1, .§11.1(1 1, I \ �, I 0 1 1 1 \,- k N N. N, NN \, \� N, , N', -- N, \ \ \ � ,� , (- �- 71 Glk-61 I N, ... I , � / , 11 -I, � - h, I 1; I"� 11 " ,�,\ �\ '! P �, " I 11 \ \ N,NN \ \ � "I 0, I \ I I . / i ) - i - 11 --*" , \ � I I I � � N \� \\ \\NN,, , , \\ � , NN \ \ " " 11 / I -1 �, I % " �� 11 .1 , I � \ / � ( ; I i k ,-/ I - I - ; I! q, �- I �,4� " , , \ \ , , , , , , � �- I - N, , , \ N, , , , "N \ I ,--., / P1 I N i . F-.- I I I i " 1 �, - ", , \ \ � N, \'\\\ \ \ , \ \� tI 1 11 � ;, \,. "N V\\)k I I i " I ) NN, \ --�, /"' I ,• - \ " I -,-_ ., I. ," 1'� ; 'N i / j -1 \� N, \ - 'N � "� " \ k 1% i ; N b � - I I , I, ,--- f i --1 ; i I - N , , , \ N � , \ %,\ I , , . , l� � ,k I ,/ ) T 14iii - j , ) N, � I. t V . IN , � , -'\. N, � \ " I I I � I � '! i- S I I N11 "N \ N N, I V", \\ ,NN. % " N - '- � i , )I :. I --�,, y I --- I / ,)I �' � \ -, N, , , , N, \ , , " I ', \ N, I ,\,I \ , I � N � I I 1kNN , N, \ , , , A - . k , , L�� " iI, a ,, k 1 . � 1 1 : I I I 1� /' 11, 'N � 1, 1 i ) � \ I ! -:I e c" ( N � I.- j / 1� IN \ \ , / " --- � i / ,,,� ," -.1 \ �, � '\ N, , 1' \ N; \ 'N ; ,,I , , I k, , • 1 1 1 1 , 1V � � /� I� 1, ", " " \ ) '? 'I � j � �! ji I / " -- � I I / � i3ii . '\ \- - , L�1� `\ ��,,\ , , -,/, / / /,f / I "',; , I I , - �, -- ,- I , "I,--"----, - 4 i \ N, N, , \ � ,� \ I t k � k , ,� t I ; I N N , , \ , � 1 I i , � , � � i I I � - , i I . I I/ 'i \ I . , k , , I 1; � \ I \ \ , : I I i ) , I % i � ,. �v- ,,, .1 , �/ 11 1, I I - - � -, ,� I" � -.- .1 � \, '\ N '� % , \ I I \ N \ , � � - I , N, NN - � , : iI � k I ) I � , ) , I I ? 11 ! '\ --.- -- "' - I-- I 1 ,I k, j - Cl�-i t3 "I 11 I I l ,i:,:i,,)i";)", , I i I --.-I -,-,. "I I I -1 -,- I k k, N N, � � � " , N \ I k I V\\N " " "\N' I , r 1 , ) < � , I ! 1, -N �', -- ---- - -� N- \ � 1-f ;1% f> I I 'j, - , , , I i, � 1� I , I �; V "' ; , 1 \ -- -- I ", -I, , I , � �. I -1 N I k , - I N, 1 , \ , , . , \ I , 1�, , I I I -% - "�\\ , � I 1. N . i N � I �. I II- . 11� ..� - - \ I I - 11 � -, ,` I - f, --- I-- -- " / , " \ \' , \ ,, � r � , N',�, " I , , , , N, , � . , � - I I "", , ,�,,,,- � � NN\ I � I I \ , �- >'/, / . � � - �A i N , , - ,\ \ ', � ; I I I � I . � , A 1; '' I ,� � , I .... .. ,",�,-, - N - ,,, I 11 -N, i 1, . C I , I , , 1, �, , , , I � I , � , I I , , :, . �, 1, i N, , , 1 , , NN /,` �, ,ry I I / ,,, % I N k 1j, `N, � I " - I - I I kz.� N,-\, \ '-� -.-, - -� I ,� k I � I - , � I I I ... "I . . . . . .. I \!' �,IiNk` , I � N I ,` / � I I , I 1-�- , , \ -- N -\"- - I I I I I , " \ I 1 � k , N � , , I ,, I I I I \ ... - --�,- V � N, ,\\ I I , , i i , ,� L I I I I - � . I-- -:�-,-'-1:1:� - I \1 I 1, ,� I I �,,, \ N, , k I . I , N k % \ i , - I I I , " " I - , I , � , " \ ,, \\\, '. , , N I I I I I . I � � I � I I I 0 ;, i. I , i z I I.. I-` , > . � �,,,I-v ,�\\. N I , , 111111 f ,,, , � \�- -- - - ; � , � -1%�7 -,�--�� ,\ N , 'N I I , -.1 �, N 4 I o\ 1". � , \\, z , , ? " , I k, I � I `� k 1, � � , �, , , I, �` / S '� - 1� , , , � ,i: , ,-,ZN. ,� -- N., N- � , I N, N,I , " I I I \ � , , I 11; " I -- -- \ I \,�, / - ,,.�, - [ X � N, � I I I 11 I � ) I � , � � " � , \ k I- j . � I -� -- -,, -� � , ,I ... Q I I i k , , I I / , I -- -- ,-�-,---, , I ,� , � N " -Z� -� � - , N�-:,--��\-Z�-'-,-�,� , , ,\,%I I 1 1µ3s 1 1 % ; i \ � I r I I . . I , , \ I \ � , I - I , S . `� N-/ � � -n� ' , ",- N� /� \ k �' 'If .. � � -- --�- <- --��--:-,' --:;7 .1 ,� ;�� -\N� I � ,Z� - I -, -,,�,- -":, �. 1. I � . ,\,, I . \ \ ", �. � � 11�1 N, i I � I � I \ \ I . \ , I � , , .. % % .11 , 1 j I I b � I ,-,i' -` \\, ,�N\ 1, , , )i\\,\„ \ 11 \ \1 \ \ I \ . . I 1'%1. -, I -,",,�� � \' I " , `N\ � � ., tI I II "I ') i N , N, i N F I 11 I % � I I , � , - '-,--,--.-I ...-,�. N 1, %, I � I I rx, 1\ - \ , I I , � I , � I I , 11 - ��-- I: ,:,-`-,5 NN \ t j ) 1, 't 1, � \ %. \ N, "N \ ; \ �, , � w I -I-,- - -- "', � I - �- - % , \'<`,N,\\VN'1`A i- I 1% % I \ �, I I --, I IN "', . , i ; . I I . L � I � . . . . "I 11 ), - - ,11 " - � 1 'I, � ,��-� \ I I � I I - I I I C-1 I �',, I �,� 1, " 5 -1, �,�- \,� %'-- , 1\ I \' - \� k , ,� - I NN - - ....... - .-.. •...-- ,% I- I f \ � , I � I I � I Ni , , N , I � t ", % , 1 , , �, 1) 0 ,-',,'� --,f V 'I r' \ . � 20 . �� - I ,�,-- - ",- ,�. , � I I - 1, I - � I � k ) � ; ! �, I k , I I I I I ,�� W'� \` <1 I k " I 'I .. - .,"; I,, I I N-�� 'N N � " \ � I 1, � � , -.,I��-, -,�, I I � ,,�,,,-, I . N, � > .1 " I . I . . ,,, I / I --�-, ,- . , - - ., - --- I - � � , N, 11 -,�A-\%% \1 N I , � . lj� " I \Nil � I I � � \ I I i I i f Ni �� � I i I f ) I ,§," II- "r � �I",,` . I . I Nzl� -\ I�X -\ `� N, I \ I � I � � k , ; I % I 1� - ---,,,I- 1, I- I IT �- . -1 1, � I � / 11 � I . " 1; : , i , f . . , I , %\W I k \ I I � , ,�� L, -\ I I j I 1 *� 11 � , I % , N iNN," , -, / I ,I- _,, - ., I I I 1 I "I I 'I' I - - , , � I '%P, \\N,,NN1i,V\k\ J'N N, " " '\-`^ \.. , -\ \ � -,., ", I ; i e I I - I , / ,;, //�,, --- � � - - ", -, � L,�� � \ ( \.� % , 1 � i " " I ,, , , � � / ", / �-,. , - -'I - -- - I I 1\ . t, ; � WATER QUALITY'. , "iN I I I I I I i � , 1�\1'.1"N,', I N / , , t I I I i . � \\" - I- - � ) I . I I I 1 - i 1 ! N 1 - , , w , . /� - � . ,� , I- �? \��- - 0 y ", 1 / � . A�,N Ni ,�\ 1, \ 1,,N\� 'N N, i'I '� .. . ... \� : ./ I", �, 11 ; 1; 1, I - � f i 1 1 1 � % � % \ I c 10,,`i� � � k t ;- ,,/ \ , " 71� L . t I - - ", , -- / ) I I ✓- - - - � ,/, ,�/,��,/ ,,,/�,-. . 1. 'N I- .1 -1 il, / " z �, VN, I .1. I, //�/"�� . �,,,-,,,I`,-,,- ft -4-,'. , - 1��,�\� i"\ , ,�� ,% - - \ I I / " 11 ! / I , - , i 11 , I � I .11 "I / '. ,Z/,-./ , I I -, ,,/"I- - - C>�, I . ,� �r I xzQk C, q• \ - -- - - � \ � �-. 41 / " i I , , I � � i I i ./ , "✓ - ,�, \ N " , I ", -- 1- - N I N� I --,- I /Z " I k, I ; -­ I I I , �,- - --,:,-/Z. 11 \ I 11 ; �, I � I , I ,- . X� , --�, I � '100 - . �,-- I I/ /I ',�,��/;7777'� �� - -, r�L-:� - - ,m; -r- �- - N_r111 , %\,\ , , , /I kii� 1, i 11 1� ,�', - . N N, "'. � \� --. 'N N, �. I.- -11 I /I � I � I / ---� /'/,,, - � '/ , �/.'- I , --I L> ,Zt�.--�:� - \`N- -� - � \1 IN, 1�111-, IN, - - "I, I , , ! )'N � ) ,k TT - - � ��, , 'N' - I 1\1 � I " �,,�,,��N "I , I " ///,,// -/X/ - - �11 I � I rl I 11 / � I -/// N, � .,% �, -, �7, -�-,�<� - - - - �, -,,,7�-, ---, 'N ,-, - � .. ... ..... � - - ,, � '-- ............. "I I -,�N " - e . / I , V�t�, I 0) I, ,1% 11- 1, - � /'//' ///fv"�/� �� -� . -1 \.� . -��, I , 11 I ,�- � " I � ? ij/ i, (/" -- ,� i � , , - -4 11 I � . ��31 ,� ,�/. . 4 , � �,\��I / I v, " � I �� I, , � �%N k Ij 11-� 1, 11�,� N, ; I / -j 1-1� 1z i-1 I ,L -y , \ ' , z � , 4 1 - , - r J �f � I ,� I . I i r- I I i i', �� IN, `\ -� ) ,,, ,-�-� " , I/ � , I fl,"I 0,11 €/ � . I 1 •:,�,5 C, 0 - f� -�� - W cx,-� - I/ � Z4 1\ I - -1, 11 , 1� - \� I � �- --_, . 0 , N ,, '`'\-, ,:,,,__ / -- I , � I , 1 4 t, i� '4 .kO "\ ( )�� , ,)p ii� ?- b � 0 a ) �NN% r�l \�! < '� �� . f -1- 1� I I iI N C �, J,/Y L �, - -t�-;�, �- - Cr', I , . il i-,,- � i, T - 11 e% , �.. (��'15, , . ,�� _,,�-> � %- � .; I -1� " 10fil", I I .,\) , al - - '.. s.,4die,T",Y,�, 0 , " 7 . " , 11'� , I �- -) ,,� --,, i, ,c-- - "I , , f AV I " �Zz�-'� , �v, ,�', � '111�- I lil.fifi' I ;k-, � . . ,Z� �� -- N, / \ \/ �- I I" 11 : U."�J,, � "A -- � I .i 1, il - " / - I�l I ." , --,�-- I ; /,;�v -,• I I IN,. -- \-.,� �, I / I .I jif/j, ,` \ \1 �- - - ,- - 1. \ / I , , -N% �- I �� -N /) I f ,� f'�fj�� ,.�k,!,, I -b, �, � , ,2. I � � " '�, J - N P I / I 0,1111 I � 1, N I - , " " I , N ` . -f.-,"it-� � 1 I, ffih) "; �.,I \,/ •\ I . I ez�,,-�. � i'-1 1"'k ,(�, ;,�,---� ) , I . )a '. N� , I \ 1�1 i"\ -�, � - - 11 , I 1 I ; -1� I �1� - � - -,� , - ,/) 4-zl�� 1, I . - \I-- "k. 6 " I \ I 1 , I � /, Tl//,---�,-, -- I , I k - 1,�, -,-I, k 11 1% 1�1 . . � �L N. /IN `- I �j -� �, --- I I -r I I •I I ,/�-� 1> � 11 f . , 11 � � ,, ,�,�X- / - " V11 � -i � . �11,,;,, , "f- � , -'-_">,-�� � --,;-,- , '--�- `-ZIN I -- -- ✓ � - "I - ,--', �-� 1) Z I\ 1� ,A , ( � � I -�-,Q , -� 1� � .fr"j ��- I- -- - 1 I t: - . 'I, � � S I -� I I , --I,,- , I , \ - I r I % I I , 1�1 I - I '2�-�,, - 1, J 1\ I -,�, ��--�N'i - I -<--- 1--;Z�� I -� \ I -, -'ei " t. 1---,1'�j , 1-1 X1, �. , � - . -, 1� ,�-, �"L lz�, I � I . N-) I - I ' I t' \ ; kiL' ,,I -� -, ,-- , -, I � I I� ry, ;� i 1.1,-, I ,i f � 11 -\ - - 11-1 , I / .1 ,- - " " ,N , I � 'Nk I f. �- 0,O) - . I ,.,- I I -- - � -- � I , � I I -1 Nk . I � r � - - I , / � N ; ; � 11 ffi �-��-- ,i7 �,- - ��,, ,� - NN \ % . -j �`- / I - �"`-,. - "' III - � _�-_�-Z�::tLl- � . -�% -,,I, I N, NN ,, . " \. �- -, -,� : \ \ j ! �-,-,- ��,�. , -- - , 1, -1 I - :�-7�- - -,� --.. - , >_,_--....,:-, , \ - fy"J, 'N I r- -1 I I ( I k��- � �� ,� 1, .1 �, N � \ ilk, � ,� N, .� - I � -�-,-,,-7 -� - -.j \ \ N,\ -�, -N 1 � I- , - �\ -, I - -� ! 1-- I ------��'- . I - /X- r I � -- - 1, - �\\\ , ",t7E;--- " I , ft --, �,� - I --" `41 - -,�,� f Z-..- - -1 - - -,� - N, - ---,::;--�, ,\�, -� 11 .�-,- ---- , � -, \% -,\ , \, N, � 11 "I , �'. I \1. � , , , ; . -, ti- -- , ,,, ", NN -..-.. IN, � "I 1-'� f/ `N`i,N,-:�--<,. -��II,�--- ---�=t�,�----� N , NN � ", ,�� I " "N\ ',,- ,, ".)N, ., /, 1. 11 ", ---� NN \ "�,-��-,,�,--�-�-----...---,-.--=-----=-=------ �- - %,, ,N, N, I .\ � & ,, - , N I , . , 1-1 • - I - I - � N, \ I, I . \_._--___-_-.1.....1.1.1--.-., -:I- ---� - - - - - � � " , , 'N -`,, ,�-> / I i , - � -1 �'\ I I - . - -V I -,-�--Z�--- - -- � %\ � I k, , -. - �, % x P / ,- - -:---:-----::�:----:--------:�- - ,i-. 0 � ,,,\ \\ ,� -_-------_.--- --'�=�--��-_7-7��-_ 7.jE��: E;�-�-<�� � 1�' `11�1 ` % Imo_ . - � �-, NN I � • - 1---=7- - ._ � N�- - � k � I � I �L �-�' --' ", '\ IN r / --'-• - �--..= -:--�:,- -I��- -- -- --:�:I - - - - ----=7--.---.\- 1 � \' � � im 16 I -- -- - -- --- --- ---�l-.:,:7----��z:----��-\-,�l-�.,� � , , , I I I/ I I -"-_�-- ----1-.------�----=.----,- ----.-- -- � , ,-11 --N�,N I \11 .1 - ­ -.- - -- - - �"- , NNI kN N , ,� . ". I- --- I , -- ,- x , . , - - -- - -- ---.- N, ,� - -_'-=--:-��--:7�:�-- ---- -- - - ---- -\ N, I k i i � I ",N, 'N I NN - - - � - - =Z--Z'-N 0 - - _ _ . I - I // I/ 11 I . 1 " I -- - - . . " --*' , . .1 x I , -- %- % I ,--I - „\ ,,t1 " I ! `-,_9 , 0 h -"-N�- i"',' WATER QUAL . ,� �, � , i% �, I I - , --- -r, 1. � � I �11 " \�j - , . I \ " , N, I f i, /I --- �,--r--",,, " ,- - - � , l. � , ! , I I I � /, � %, -w- N, [ . . , � � I 1 , , . I � � , , ,.,� - , � - I . I ,-% I � , 1 t " ; : " ) , , " i;�,- ,,,- ,�- <-� --- �-- BASIN #1 .... . I \ I , � I , 1 1 - -u L -� � L -1 -- \ I , , t I � � ,- ) t ff G ) i - - - --r' I �-, ,<,;�- I I I I -,�--- I , I \ � ', 1 . N\ - LEGEND fl, , I'- , 'i'./I`,�! h , NNk, fll,� ��ii��,l I �c. I I � f-'� (� " NNA� ) I I- .��,",,� .",-- � I I I 11 . 01 i / � 1, N� 1, I �! ,� k -1 11 I , / - I I � e,-" � -- I- - � � . f t.� j,". <-, � rI` -,. , I �,)� � .,- - - .1 I / I11"', . ', ; I ly--,- �I t ) I . � ,, k,,�, 3 N, . k t 11 � I I i,, k , - - . � ,,�\ : -N-N'U, \� ., - - ,-1 F\, \1-, I'VV^ I � -,I�/ .''... � N, -, - .1 -1 .. -? ,-'/,,< �/"� -, I ,- I I , _ / 'N -�( . .. \ \'- "I /I ", - A N, IN. CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION NN,\ , N , 1 'I ; - - , I 1�.>,.; 2" , . �J N; `1,��,�� �- � V t � �,-�V� - --, / \ , ) ( i �---, 1�1 � . 9 - 'N, V ? I e , - 1%11 , - I I �,�,�- - z" ��, . %...... 11 / , , i, I I - � N > I II 4 I- , TO BE INSTALLED AFTER 1ST LIFT \\� \ Ni\ � 1 � ( ,�' )- P I - Ni,-rj I \_1`?- - - \ N I , % I j ", 'A k , I ,/ ,- / " , � ..... , . I I . 1- " , 15� , '- --; � ", I N i- I . I -- / I �.. � ... / / '\k , " , �, � 1, , Y� t f-,. , , 1i 'I I I i �- N, I% OF BITUMINOUS. ,\\\, � J- Q-,- * 1 rif�, I /I ,:: // , , \N\, \ , , 1, " la' -N I k, < - ) 11 I '4 , /�� I" r, 'N �-4� , \�,,N N,- ; \\ 1, -,,, � I } ,-- I I \1, 11 \ - 10 - I P I 6k N, . I ,\ /I / . I , % tA, ( ®� " - N �� >) tt ­' .1 , '\' -� " I � I I) / .,j ... I/ 2 ,- - N .. I.. I ... / / I ; CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION ,NN,NN",,kkkk r\N, I ---�\�-`N-1 - \ ) . -- mil J- 11 I / I / I., � .. I I 11 I -- ... I -? \ � \, � - NN // I I. � -11 1, ,/,I I ',,� I I / I /J t�,� , 11 11 , " I i- / I �,, /� ,,,,/ \% 4 - t-, * t b 1, 1�') ,�. \ -,; , j / / ..... I I I . I I TO BE INSTALLED WITH CATCH ,\\�\\W"k\k � I � - -� , '0 , i- I I/ -e� A, ,/, I .. .. .- %!/,=r/: I , " .• , ,� � V i � - NNN� -1 ) \ , , / - 8 ) / .. . - � N� NNIk"'lly'k, '. -, N\ \1 ,�, ! e�- N, ,Z, " � I / \x I ,�, // , / III i - , .. - . I/ / --`/ ; / i .\\\\ \ � ilk'OXI ', -, ,� 0 f^ , ;` Nk I -1 -- . ,` .1. /� BASIN GRATE. \\\ 1� j 'N -N ) .1 \1 I I/ // Al"-, ) Y/ //� .... ..'.... 11 ..- 1. // , I / , * . ".1", I I ii -) k, � I . I Z *. ,. . "I'll I I /, e IN / I ') N, ,��) 'I I T /I I I I - // , I , !� I \ i / I// /I/ ,v- � ,/,/// . � 11,11\'No 1� .-- - 4 1 --I" " //'/- � I � !IV/ I , , .- 1111", \, �,I,, I -I - � ; I/ I � � I \ 'k i - ,,ik 11 / ,/ ,;"/ " � � N \. `1� I I f N .1 .1 \\ jp-�\ I 1� \\ � I �� ." I , -,, \ "I / - " - , /" 1"; I ... ��1111... 11--. . I . I \1 PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL FENCE. N004 - �h 13 \-- /- �� ; I I I I I / M, k ,� i, \--� . I , / / ,,'/ / � ,e , 'I , f, , ) �'k � ,,> 11 , ") / I/,1 - " 11 � \ \-,,, n - �,-, � -. N � � j � I I ./ -.... I - �/ INSATLL BEFORE START OF GRADING \ N N, �i, - I -, _"""•'' -il' ,/-, � I / \ \ 'N ) ,,I� -�- � - \-4� 'r, " I \�j � I j 1--`1-'/,/ //I/e // . � � , -- -- -, . ,,,, -,, I; 1�1 � �� A I 14�� , , /* " / / I \\ %\�\\mw , 1%�� �77 -----`--�_1e1- " I` //,,-" "', I - I I... I / \\ ,�. , 'i,; - I . r'" - ... I � -� 'N � , g\\�& 0 ) , ) � I I I- f " " ,-� Ir / I \�\\\ \ \\� , -�, - � ��/--�-- � , ,\A `it),& - ��,.-> , �-- � I � : /I - /I,,/,,/ j ", � N � I � 'N, (., lN, � , - / I- 1/'11 .. k / eeeeeeeee HEAVY DUTY EROSION CONTROL FENCE. N N�N, i��\-' - - '- , � ,� ,b -I- N, 1 �, K � "k., I - .1 - -- I "? -, ---, I I ,� I � i�/V,�, - .", . - 4F /// I I : -\ \\� \N, %',:� \,�-, . ''.::. i -,, I � I I � ,�� -:�, - - - - -,- ,,,"'. V - T�6 - ; I I 11 I I YF- , " �"/ / , , �.. 11 I � ,,,�/ " f; / -k 1; INSATLL BEFORE START OF GRADING , , -�Z- -\,x t. -V, Q� t�c \ X k � ..... . ` I I I / / I --0; e ,// .. �1' . � 1. N,\ \ N \\\ k ,�k\�\& k" k w � V , ', - - ,_,, , , .1 ,,, , I " I / 1, If ,,. 'IV ", \AA' \-. - -, ., )� / �, .11.1. I/ " / � , , " � / I/ , , 'r " �/,�,'// / /,�' , 1/1 ; I \ " � \ ,\ �, � f, I 1; �, I " , \ \\,\)\ �k\\ ,� N-, � ",'��,L^ \-., Ni%V3 , ) ,I� 'N . , � / � r , N, - - NN ,\ ,\N \ �kkN �', ��,� N\ '141 6' , I C' -- i I" I X I I I ", / I ,,, 11 I/ , .",/ I � / I / I ;- .�, I I \\ ��%,S�� ,�\ k',�;-�, I I r, � �'\�. ; , �, - /` i'll" /"/ / f 1� / � j", , , , I/ f , - / I I FENCE. \\a, ,�� � \x 'i Ni �, 1� I .< " / " / SECONDARY EROSION CONTROL \\ � \ NNN, , , , I I / I - N\ N ,\ , k-- Nt I /11, :� I 11 14 � �, .... I -.,- IfIle / ,� /� f 1711, 11 I I . ... ... t/ I . TO BE INSTALLED 48 HOURS AFTER 11 \� - -,\-, \ , \\A\� N, 1�:-,�-,��- W 118��11 k11 " IiIs-�,- - , "/,':'%/ -.. , I / / N, \� N N\\ NN N- � , , , -w " - ,J�,, I �� \1, - �;"/,. � IN- �11 / .11 -l"",t, -. , .f " 1, s -. i / I/., I " ,.�, - 1_, - le11 I - TON OF GRADING. '\I \ \ -1 I- � �e;� F- I / ,; ,-.- / / ,,, It I COMPLE I N, � \V I \1 � I -,------- :�,�� - � I, , -�'��fi- // / //I I , , // / ( NX, , , ��-,,--Q�A-%,\-------/ - ,,I - 1� A'­Ik,�QIJALftY ,11',41,1 '//�/ I . . , ,\\\ ) ii �- -1 ( 11 v, I ,,, I \ N, \ \Z ��\&'\\`t � / I I � � � 1////`-1 I , , \NN '� \\,\,\ N- / " �'/ 11� � N%7,z 1- -1 k, -..- . �i i� ,,, ASIN #3 -,1 �;, - , I- f i ; k i - - , l I i B E3 E3 B E3 B SECONDARY EROSION CONTROL FENCE. � N \, , �i\, , , "�,"�� 1� --- r - I -'- N, ', V,��"N � -�- 4 'T X/ I'V, I "I t � \ � x �� - , , , ---� - � / � - � -1- �?:57 1 � / , , \ W, /� / /// � I / 'I � , NN �"N-\ I\M A % - ,,Z�\\ � I .- TO BE INSTALLED AFTER COMPLETION 1\ \ \ �N -t-�fz�,,�-,�,-i , % � :' ;, , I /. 11, - ,/ " I " / .//,' , , / �,�� / / f., I ,��- gff ��-:z�--��, , �'-, , � , ( I ,- � �e_�,� \1 \. ,, \'<.\ \N, N %\�," \1 - � �. �-, - � - I F,d - 4i"., 'i I � , / ',/// , \ \ � \ 1 , - - -N , , .,,\`\.,, , - 1, I I N.. � I - \\ \ /1� , . A / // It ( I� \- \\\�,t�,\��, -, \ \ " %�' ", , , "' " 11 1,"'w, "IN7.,,.�, ��-, ,- --Ate. I ,,� It .. ,9/ , /, /� 11 I OF SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION. `� \ \ NNINX \N \ N'N N, , ,N ,_ < � V IN. �, V 1 � \ \ I I -- �� , -� I -1 'IV, I I� " // / / I / i \, \ N, ,\ N, ", \ %z\ , � � Z, ,�\�,,��,, -,^.-i ��,- ,�-\', W\X�- , .\\, �, � \1 - � 'N N I-, , ,�. � ",- / I,/ --,_, ,,�, - " I: I - y,,, ;r �, I / � /' , 1 j / / � , � , � - I I k I I I,- �,�,, I ,:�,' f � 4 �, 11 , I ,; I , ,i I I \ � NN �\ N, "\ \ , 'm N � - , ,<�-,�,,- I -r-.�'-N. I- -/ �NX/ , ''. �, /," I I , e ,,, - --- � � 2 //Y ,A, // I k 'N , "<,\\ -\ K�, - -.--. I - � , I / / i y "N \\.. � -,\\\\\\\\,.......,,�N � -,��- -, k_� �, I I i f V. 11 I / I " ,f, 1-',`�., �-y , I I \ r---�----------1 \N \ ,� NN \\ \ \ ,R\,� N N k -NZ�F� 11�,-� \ \1 - - �N�'., I" /,�, i I / . / / - ,/, ,/ , " If I , I . 11 11 - , , I �- " , I---- I I �11 > /' -,y, / 11 I /,Z/ J, " I 11 I N ��\\N, ,,, I . I -�0�1--- -- ----- N'. AI I I . . . . ,-,4 x -\ ",\.\ N, \ \"\N N � N �Zxk - ,�N, XN�,��. -�� � // I A, �� . I V I / I 11 / / , , MNDOT CAT 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. " NN'N \ N, N k,"A R -,N ,-N- � - 'N , -, ,,, %---\ I - I - , �\�11 \,'\', ,\ii,',,� , ''I I / " I , i I / f k i I ; . --j �', N'� � - �,��: �\� � , -::'� , , ! ",� -� " " . I,/ --1-1 IF �,", , . \ \ \ \ \ 4*-S��-Z�',`N \�, , - �11 I I I � � �,, V ;(, / I L=� ,\ . , - , ,,,�,, , - - I 11 I ; � /, / I .1 /,/,/, / A , � INSTALL WITHIN 7 DAYS OF GRADING COMPLETION '\ N N% % NNN NN `� � N,� \ -, I �, I I I ,,�;'11; ---- ''I " r', , '\ 1� "Ill /I / � -? / ,,, k, ! 'A\\ i'l; - .. WI I / I I / -, -/ - j I � I", ,\ 1\t \ I ,,, ) ?'V,�// I " , N N, 1, \ ,%k --�:f�- ,-�,�N\,,- , - \ -. /';,� I I \ 'N \ \\ \ 1, ,,�N�,��, , �N ,-, "', \- . j " I I , " I/ , i /-'i,I:,- I . I . � ;.)-- � L r f. CA ,,"I�,7,fll/l/, II ", - // / I /11 / -- -- �, \\ \ \ NN , .- .. � / I I'l " X , fp!?,1.,' , , 1, li� , " I --le 0, ,, I V ; " �' ,�,I'Y;ie , , I , / I //' , / , / -, 1. ,", i " OR BEFORE 1ST RAINFALL EVENT WHICHEVER IS FIRST \11 ,\\\�, \�� -,Z�,� ,X\ \ - ,; , --\-,"-� - 1, . - / ; ,;, �',;, �;' //. � /"/I/ � , / .�- -,Z��,�a,,Z�,�,�, N, '\`-1 A , - ,", N, N, I�N, I I I/ I / I ,� I ; .I - I , � ,,,/ Z 'N -- �, � . 11 ,, 1, / If '. I,,,/',/ I I / I I/ n '\ \ N, N. \\ \ N N� --,-Z�,� �,,��,��--:�,,- I " / /(, / I . / " " // . I "' 11 I - ,,�\ I /.� I 1, I " " ,/ "X . ,; I-,, " I; � "";," �//,- ,,! I " \:," \ I , 11r " , / ;/ / I I III \ �� �� ,��`,`k I ,,, / / I , / I //, " I ,/,, / 1� \ , ,-)� A�_z - , , `N\-`,-` ,\ \ - `� ,e r \ �'. ��: -� .1/ I I , , I I 11 � > ,,/, I , -,,�, ""N \ I k� --1 " I I J I ;, �' �/ I Z- " , II ii � Ii / I If ; I � I - ; ,� "\\\X \ ,��- - ,,:�,��,,, � , /",� "-7��,-""///�--' ,� 11 j I /,� I /'/1 N, \ -,'\\'N \\ %, - I, �, N��\\ , ---Z�� - , -�- / , <;/' ; I . I `N%Z'�, � I I I // /I -1-1/ -), \'� - "N��!�� � 1-N"Q It, -" I I I I // -i,y� - ,,,,,, � � , I r - N \\ N . \ ,>,�T- \,N -��7,, 11 \ I I � I r-��---,:-,�,;�/�q ; ��: 11,�) � - , I I / I . I / \ ,IN -V�,I -\ 1-�", , <N�-� � N� \ I-< : I / f I 'wf"/ / / ,,- " /, � - I �," �-,-, MNDOT CAT 4 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. I \ I I ,i, I ','��`N,, '� , ,�, - , - " �', N, \ ;1 I ; 11 '' I / � I- , � - n � �', " ///, / / / , " ,� --�� , � �, I I // ,/ III ; � I\ \�, I - , , ,-1/ / // . -I /�, ,�'-, \'\\'\ - -,,- \1 , �. �� I - ; ,,, I N - �f` / / , , - / I --11�, ,\ -'i I , ,�:, ,-- -'\\\"-,. I / , /. / I ",111�*m " \ .i NN,\,, 'I, 7, 1 "/,",/1"// // / , / / // - I �=\, I �� , , ... I / I - m INSTALL WITHIN 7 DAYS OF GRADING COMPLETION ,\ \ \ N, \\\, k, \ b ,,, " " ,,,�,,,, , \-, \ \--- ...... .. -/; .; , I / J. "Ill; f!", I : 1, � ... 11 '� I � 1\,Y/�-',5-�/ //� -/" -/• I 11 I " I . " , --- --�\\�- - ,\N��- - , - / �' , / '�'/ , If, I/ 11",f, I : . ,,%,-11,1,1i , W* -1 I I ,,, " �\, \ -- N"\ � -11 .1 \1 I I- <1 N., �' "k I 11/ ..... ... I /,/, " 41 � N � I 1�--" ., ,-,. - - ", � , , I ! ", - "'' / " ( , , -""/ / ; I; . ,-, � � I I I- , . -- il I--- \ N, \ \\ "�\ � ) I K 1�� \\,� - � , f , I / -1 � I X" OR BEFORE 1ST RAINFALL EVENT WHICHEVER IS FIRST X \" 1Z ,- \.\ III I , , " " , A� ii Z " N �W N, - "I 1�? N, 11I , 11 / - 1, / I/ � -\11 ,\\, 11 I, \� - / I/ "I"' I 'It //7 / / ,/ --- - \'- , zl�� ,� - �, / , , - � I ,/ , , NN 11 /I .1.. I /I I I/ -" \ \ , NN S r, - , , " ��\�- , / - , - I I � . 1,,/,`�-,,; \ z � IN I 1"�,Nl -, "k,N �, �- \ / / ;f/ I ;I 1. -.- , , , III - I I"'. ;; i 1 1 ... - ... � I - .1 -//,/ I I" f , f / I �✓ I I I I - - I )� ,I. ''; I . x;k;,- -` I'! � -- If V;r / III \\\ /,1 N\\N,,.-\- � 1%NN, -� ,"��-�:!---�-, ,\ , , 1 �__�, !! - ... I / \ N�"\ -`;��, " / , " I I " " I � " ;iI f ( I I , I-; I I ,'�', \' . . I /;"�,�/�� - / I, '\ NN\ I I -1, ,��,!N�\ - , I I ; / \ �,' 4 , -, .; - . . // / / / / -I' -, N \1 \, iN , I- 1�- �, -,�,, - �, �,-,---, I , ,� � I -" "I ", / I / , / /. /'; / , / " , ; , I ,,, I / � , -N S) ,- ,- - I- N ,,,�,,. f /./ I ... 1. , , , / � //, - . ,I I I I " / / / I " 'N� I N, NN \ -,�s j , \ � I . Z� ''", I I , -., I I I., q I\;\.\"I f, " � /I 111.1.11�1� � I"' / / ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE \�,� ",\\\\ �'Z,,, " , - --�- -_� - � \_ , ;/ / I / -1,< � . IN, I ./ I , I. . , . 11 ,/ / 11 ^ �, A �,,- - � � , / , I . 1, �>ii N1111 --,5 "N, ; /I I 'N , \ \ \'N � ,j �4�11 - �� � ; - i, /, .11 / / / ! / ,,, / i I/ fi� � r -N -N � %I .._ -.,-,, , , 1� I " 1, I I I /' I - I , , 1, -N � ; I .. . �-, ,--., -), / - � �. - ) -? r , , ININ "I - ) � , 1-1: . ;, I / / /,w -If I " 1 , , , I , I I , \ , I , , �- iz� - , � I I , ", - r / / / / INSATLL BEFORE START OF GRADING \1 l-,, , \ ., -,Z�,,\\\�,,N\I,k -- IN '\\ � 1, I / " � ""I' "I G" � � �, ,,,, I � ,�,, ,- If ��, // I I , j I ' / � / /I " III Z \� N, \ \ \'/ ) ,,1 � I �-,!\--N�n\f --<�,1,-N�11',ill -, . , , \ , - " / I V 1� I I - ,""-,, , I I , N I- �, Nr \ �j ?, 1 , I : .... ,� I � 0 N ,,-'I I` IN, - /I I- ), \�-- -, , , I ,/ - 1// f " / I- , J� / I ), I \� 0 � ,", ;� i I I ! I I I ,,� I-/ ,/ X / I -- - , , , -- t� \" " \ \ \ \/ I 1\1 "I" - -�� 1-1 � I � \ k " I '1/ 11 //, � " , , , , " 11 " , •: "'i, I -,� , , , � . 11 I I I I /" / 11 I/ \ � I � ,I, I N, -N"\ N I f;f-... � �. - �,, I // I , ,�/ '/ I 11 \' � : ,>NN,\1k',W1jn� \� / I � , I I 1, \ r,r- ! 1 � ,t!'' . " " \ 1��`, ; I 11 - r , �� II I I .1 , I*I ,"k, I \ NN \ - ; \1 N 'hf,".111, , N-, N,j / / I " / " " '�, ; / /", - 1, I ') ) , K.. �� . -1 " I 00--% STRAW BIO ROLLS �, \, N, \ -� I �.Z� , "5k Iii" ,//// I " 1�, I I ; , I . 'I N, �- \ -; IN " - - ��e ��\",�� �I 1 !I _-- III 11`1 I I I N \ J!. / �/�W,,�?,, � -- Z�, I I I , / 1, " �, I , , � , �, %. I - I I ,\,Z�--�-�---,,�- -� , I'll I ,�, -Z, \ ifl, ) . . � I I / -/1/1 I I -_ /I - I I ."' . ---%, - ! I .,//-','!-�� ---, / I I I.. I ; ; " "I // , I I'll, --I�' ,,x � -,, -- � - j � I k� � I \ ,-, -, �, � �,��- � , / ­'�­ , --,,,- -N, . I I - -,,I I % , I --- , , , � \\NN, k x )" ji:tk��; -, - " . / 'I" I � - �- � 11 ,/2 I � ) '�, )� \ INSTALL WITHIN 7 DAYS OF GRADING COMPLETION \, ,� \ \---.- �k / I � ,,, 11 f j / /I I 'Al ,��- -o -, � -,� ). k, f -N� I �, / / / I .1 I- ." I i I -N\11 ,\N� - N�--�-�,- - -- - , / , , \1 N \ -, . � ,,,�, , , -�, -. I , I / " /; ", / ; ; I I , "� - -'-' �"\ NNN I I , I f ; 11 \, \ I I I" -," OR BEFORE 1ST RAINFALL EVENT WHICHEVER IS FIRST / IN. \ �, .,-,) -,-- \� I "I --,�-�, -\,�%\�N - , , f '!� \ �, % ,� N,\NN\ \-oi >1 t,.\\\, I I.. // "" � I I - I �I`I 11 -11 I" . , . %') k I 1, ,�'N, 11 � �, I I / , ', \ N, \ � 11 ,1, I I \ N, � - ���, - " \ � �\� I ,-�,,---- 1, ,11,,�,-�-­---.-, / / / : I � �, N -1 x � ',,,X�, N, N� \, . . \ -NN,0 , .... - ... ,/ -/ ', I �- I� I I , \ -N. �, 11,,`� � ,/1 I. I..... � ... /"// " , 1 " " N--,-" --, �,- ff , "I","'', , I / / � . % �,��, I " ­ I I I 4-�, N \\\kN%, � ... -1 I 11 -" 1, ( ,'7,'.�kN_,/r'-`-=--•^.. \1 IN' ,,,, ,,���-,�---,-- / " , I �, "I'll -1 � -1 - \ ,- ,,, <�, �,-', // �\ -\ I ,� � I , - , �,-_;, "I'//,// //�//,/"? ) I : � \ -,Z�Z'�\-\ - -. 11. � �,��,-- - I I j " - -- // I \1 1j ��\ 'Z> �Ilii, 1."e ��,��\\� , ,'- N11 -.- I N1 ,�, I / 1/1// I 1 N " �, 'NN 'N .- III Ataft1k ROCK BERM 11 \ %, � ,� % I I I I " I I I : I - , I/I j '�,, kt� �,,-"�7;�;"�,-'�,\\\,' "',�'I'\,1\"N�- I I I I ;1 I I � - ) - \ �, # " " -- ,,,, � I / j \ 1 , � I', I I I / I/ / � K 11 i � \\\,-�--` ��/" ,,, \ - " ---,- , - � ��, C� " -,I, 11 I �-,-��-� -, - - --;,� , ��-\, -k"Zz� >/�>);"- 11 - � . '� I I . , -.� �- I I" , ,-� , ,� f ! i I \1 ..... ,0 I , , , < // I 'N,� Z� -,- 1, NNN�---- I ;� . .% " / I 11 , � INSTALL WITHIN 7 DAYS OF GRADING COMPLETION 11 11 � , - , ,. zl��/21-/ F 11 , I I I I . "" I , - I'- 1, - -- NN, N, J)�j \ ,,,, I / " / f . . -� . ..... ; I I " 1, . I - - I N . `/,� II,"IfI",� , I I \ I N� ) � " -- , ., I \ J-- � �, ,�\�\ ''...'. � � -/ . ... ...- / '- -,"' III I �\, e -.-�� ", N, I %: .. -1. 11 i, , , -, 1 � I E,--- I I I ) I - ' i .. ", -`j /� I I I I V I I N, \ `� ,,, ,`- 1:7 � \ �I ,;-,� -- "I-, 1, 1� 1--,� - --- -, I ,,, / ,,- I/ /I 1 � I �1' "'.1 ; ; �,, , -- `N. - \ I I, I .. "I OR BEFORE 1ST RAINFALL EVENT WHICHEVER IS FIRST /\ I / I 1, �� , i '. , . 1I.- I J , "--, /I - 1, �-- �::��. / II / I , 0 - -N -- �, „_/ --- -, I 1.\\, ,� , � 1, , 1, , \I\-",- -,--/ � I � � -. , I` --,, � \ 11 � I IKI I I " I I - f - I / I �, - ". "" -, -� I/, 1'r, Z" , I � v,\ " ,,,, , I 1, �/ ,Ie, ", --- I- I-----,-,-- `- _d; v)/ / // /- \ . , '\ / I \ ,--) )"lN -- - I I I I� ,/ ,// ",\" \ - 'N, /-/ / ; I /I .1 --�- , I,--",-- -- /..// ',/ Z/ I �; / I / 11- - 1, , I . I I \\ \ N --.I , , 11 '\ '' , I - \ \`' --"\ I "I ,11 -1 . I/ ,` ,I---,--- I/-' / I -I ,I-,`-1 NN ), A �`� 1�✓ -,\ I", � 1, I I I I \ , \ N 'r 11 1-1 / / 11 � 1`N`// ,/ I- .1 r - A--,-�7 1��NN ,-,�- I I-N� , ��'---,-IIf'-'-"',--,� I N, \ \ -, I ', -" / / I, '\ \\\ f , 1'� N. \ - ,I`- , , 2 ! 11N \ / Nr 1. � I 11 I I 1, N, ,\ NN� N, NN, N, N, .... / I / I 11 , --- /I IN, , ,f % N I . '-- , '� I \ \,, �, I/ � )� I -\ -,-'\ ,,� I � , I - I I , 11 "I --, ", 1, - '/�', �, � - I" / -, ,\ /' 11 � J � - � ir� ) k:-� I ,/�,,, / 1,. y I ,I I I % I � ,-- I � - , 'I I If " -, � ,�,,-- , I ,- -1 ,` I � - , 'N , I I I �-- - , I � \ i.1, k, % ;-:1 ,�� , ,,,,-,:- --,'11')�Ilr, N, - T \ N, ,---.�,- - U�iii" 1.1" 1-111, \ , . � " , 11 , \ 1. \ , / I I / : 11 r" -r .� /I I /1)1111`.e�-,�---) "?>\\ 'N 1� 0 /510/ -d / 200 ), 1--�-- � IT- ; I NN N� i , � , , \ N I I / I I, - 11/ / � , ) ". I , • �., . 1 . \,�' '1----' -/////�,f A , N / 16 I -N �, . .-, \ I k . �; i ! � . I - I I I f ,,- ,, I , ) ir)- <- I -, � ; , 1�, I 1 ,I f, I I - I \ 11 11� - I ,.-- - I 1_,, , �) k \ I - - "' , . I / -�o I/;,/- . , 'j, � ; "i I.-- I N \ 1� N\ ,4 \N j / � ; f I I f r,f, ,,, ;' . I . ,�, ,,,,!�? ,; � �,*, - \,��- , ,/ - /j Iik-" .1 - -- TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN . ; I �,, I I .� I - , i�l r - N, 1\, - / � 11 , , / f if --, �71-� � -ki - 1i ", � -, 1. ,� ,�-I . �. - 11 , ` I 11. - I �/�11 I ,� . , \1 " IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIpmol I ;- � '/, ,; , " fi""', , I /- I ,- - � L ,I .1 -,�\ i-,, z-- Y, I / I 'p I I I . , . � -�;� - 1; � , j . i� , j/ ,; ; � 11 / .1 I I , . , 'r , � IN I -� . I I F , I ,tf - 4 . ! j ��I, \ -I- , !� � i � , � I � - !` I � � I 1 -3 1`1�- - " - N, \ / I -, I N �� 4N, . I -�?,�/ -, I - , / I ,If ;, " ) I � - � N" Q ! 1 �, , ,-, � I I . 1��3 / / I Irl" 11 I �) " \ I I I - -,- I , I I . � �,I` --f :I- \/ I -Ni k � 11, 1�, �\ , i, I \ , , 1 - I . i � - , I.V i;::�t; � - -1 / f; / ..., I/ 1^1 I - I- --l" ir4,�� - � r I- -- -GRAPHIC -, AWfk FEET " 1 7 ,- , , : I I �-��/' j ,�, I 11 I I � � I - - I` / , ,7�,� , I, -) IV I , I "I/ '�,- I �, "I / I . -- x � 1 . � / f � I ----�p I / "/ �, 11 - r I, 41 - 41`i.,"ii` Ir '�, , ,-�- , .... � NN I 1"� I \N - - - \ // . X -----= -4, -� / / - , T --1 -- `I1 , , A -\ I 1 k I / ! 'N, , , , If i - -,-X--T, - _; , � X�\- -- N 1 ,/j , 'I- I N- ) ��/ ' �,, � I I e / , x 1L.-. T -x- i - I // - .1 I ; k- - , � /--/ / 11� " A I I 1� / ,�, -, ,I- "" I j .1 I -- / � I I� I , I I , -"" I , , , , I � �, , I , -1 ,i . z . , / ,,�,/i/f / / 1, - , I - � � � � I I I ,, .,--- -N, \N, - , , � f I - �I- - , -- - - - -,-- -/// ", , A f ", I I I ,J - i I I I .. . , Y., - - 11� \ P18NEERengineefing . I ) , il. ') , , - - : - � I '? � I . -- f I/ I 001121,16 -112289 -SHEET -EROS I .1 I I 11 ; / I I - ; / .1 CJVU,ENGE EM LAND NNERS LANOSU VEYORS LA SCAMARCHr[`=S 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 691-1914 fax: 681-9488 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 www.pionecreng.com (D 2013 Pioneer Engineering - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - ---- - - -- - 5 FT. YIN. LgGTI PM s FT. N. LENGTH POST AT a IT. YAIL WACNG GE Mm DE AT B FT. MAX. SPAGHIG G£gTEXTLE FABRIC PLASTIC 2F TLS RAenc MP D0 /JB Y1DE (so t& Tgs1E) Al gp,�ANCH (So A. 1FN91£) LGCAIED IH T5 B" �TM j' AI IncnTm Ix TOP e^ rvnnwAL sal TRE COMPACTON ZONE naw 8'111X. n FLOW RiO-.w Q r Cs ZB c 8"YIN. C. MACHINE suDE MA' - 12 DEPTH w SILT FENCE, MACHINE SUCEDOW SILT FENCE, HEAVY DUTY= FABRIC F 0, FLOV �m 6' � aw IN. SILT FENCE, PREASSEMBLED (tom BACKFILL SLOPE GRADE MAX LENGTH 52 - 5z% 1575pp5 FFEEEETT 10-1020 % 25 FEET SILT7FZ PERYNDOT SPECS. SOORCEGREATER THAN 20% 15 FEET . 2573 !3866.LOCATION OF SILT FENCE to tect Arno From sleet Row FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL um Con"ulby AA•o: 1 Aw V 61Ap yRAOPE— SILT FENCE NEAR TOE OF BI SLOPE OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS LOCATION OF SILT FENCE FOR PEREMITER CONTROL CIffOF SILT FENCE N`vSED: 1-10 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PUTS xD.: 5300 1IE NAME: C: ° SPECS 5300 1. ROCK WEEPER MNDOT TYPE 9 MULCH (1X2" WASHED ROCK) DIRECTION OF SURFACE ROW TYPE IV GEOTEXTIIE FABRIC ANCHORED IN 6' X 6' TRENCH [NTH 6", 11 GAUGE METAL STAPLES AT 4' INTERVALS — / -STAPLE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF FABRIC AT 2' INTERVALS MNDOT TYPE 9 MULCH (1 $" WASHED ROCK) STAPLE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF FABRIC AT 2' INTERVALS DIRECTION OF I as Far mottoes SURFACE FLOW W=10' MIN, 25' MAX TYPE IV GEOTEXTLE FABRIC W(FT.)- 10 X DRAINAGE ANCHORED IN 6' X 6' TRENCH MNDOT TYPE 9 MULCH (I )J" WASHED ROCK) WITH 6", 11 GAUGE METAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION -A 54 LOT SINGLE FAMILY STAPLES AT 4' INTERVALS 6' TO B" DIAM. WATTLE YAIH 36" LONG D� POSTS DRIVEN 24' INTO GROUND AT 30 NOTE DEGREE ANGLE ALONGSIDE THE WATTLE SPACING = HEIGHT IN FEET X 100 ) 4' O.C. ALONG ENTRE WATTLE LENGTH SLOPE GRA DIENT CEIOF WEEPER DITCH CHECK/ Comm DITCH CHECK WITH WATTLE REVISED: 2-10 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT nAre N0i 5302H FILE NAME: G: ENG SPELS 53021 PHONE NUMBER PI$NEERenginee sing CIVILENGINFERS LANDP[ANNERS I.ANDSURVEYORS LANDSCAPEARCHITECI'S 2422 Enterprise Drive (6ax: 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: reng.c 88 S www.pioneereng.com © 2013 Pioneer Engineering W_�-�.qwom 0- 1"-2" CLEAN CRUSHED ROCK • ♦ I I I W 6"MIN.DEPTH FOR ROCK 10*MIN.DEPTH FOR WOODCHIPS • • w _II 18' MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFFFROM FILTER FABRIC NOTE: FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. 11 aff of I ROCK CONSTRUCTION am= ENTRANCE REVISE[: 1-I0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLATE No.: 5301 FILE NAAEG:\OIG\SPECS\5361 F2" TO 3" WASHED ROCK I PLAN VIEW A A L t DRAINAGE WAY _ N 3 + 3 L= 2W II, SECTION A -A NOTE' D=3' MIN. 5' MAX DIRECTION OF W=10' MIN, 25' MAX SURFACE ROW W(FT.)- 10 X DRAINAGE /DEFLECTOR PLATE AREA (AC.) OF FILTER ASSEMBLY PROJECT DESCRIPTION -A 54 LOT SINGLE FAMILY 10' FILTER ASSEMBLY CURB D� RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION LGEOTEXTILE HIGH-FLOW FABRIC MIRAFI FF101 FABRIC L1% MIN . REVERSE GRADIENT III. TRAP OUTLET NOTES: W 2' TRAP USED FOR 2.5 ACRES DRAINAGE AREA OR LESS. DESIGN VOLUME IS A TAXA' MINIMUM OF 1800 CUBIC ^ FEET PER ACRE OF 1 T W CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA. CFFIOF I TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP US= 2.5 ACRES OR LESS PMSED: 2-'0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PUTS N0' 53021 mLE NAME G: ENG SPECS 53021E SEDIMENT TRAP MANUFACTURED BY WIMCO,LLC.SHAKOPEE. MN.. ESS BROS., CORCORAN, MN. OP EQUAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS DESIGN LOADS .¢ u,wu, M rnn miclw,mw ant Emw Nusa[ svF smut uva WA .�v�i .. n tont _ ma, o1.1 -0A IVH ne101 WA D ass F3• - Wal Now ens Verses Ns ,r Fuse, aNn ase e S If/O mow. LEwYe a.WLA awls LA CR w le Ie s MODEL#CG23 LECTOR PLATE PROW 1 - CENTER OF FILTER N )VERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX 10' FILTER ASSEMBLY CG -23 HIGH -ROW HIGH-FLOW FABRIC W NOTES: 1. CLEAN FILTER MEDIA AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT AND REPLACE IF FILTER IS CLOGGED WITH SEDIMENT. 2. REMOVE DEBRIS/SEDIMENT FROM RECEPTACLE AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. CMOF CATCH BASIN CHMEN I SEDIMENT TRAP REVI 1-10 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT "uTE N0'` 5302A RLE NAYS G SPECS 5=A Where the flow of water is sheeting, place sod strips perpendicular to the direction of water Row. SHINGLING SOD OF O\��G tiJ�01/I YtPA�iC Where the flow of water is concentrated, place sod III parallel to the direction of OVERLAPPING SOD water flow. NOTE: Although pegging on sod is not specifically reauired i• is understood that the contractor will be responsible for the successful establishment of the sod Including repair or replacement of sod which becomes displaced or damaged due to lack of protection or proper care. CIFIOF I SOD Cf= PLACEMENT NEVISEO: 1-ta PUIE NO.: Ric xAYE:D\vIc sl>Ece\s3o3 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 5303 SAMPLE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS WexruN A m roOT &EW MTvA LOT 1 , 93e'i. ,w.ATn a"w(Tai /. a WI ANO ..I. tom, •r 6 oxo LOT 2col ^ra) r fes'ik LOT 3 I I I MMN 1 - !-xoat a1 fNew eVn fFN1Y TOM AT Newer', LIRE CPTCx i - C XT nNCE OHA-LP➢ AT P,hP' EAIY LK leaaa TILW r1mJwE pmM•.11 M la,N F Un 6m'n9. Z� J aT KK RaoF o BTNAw Natal Me h cumsR a.q-uP saT Fxm Ins., g1RAXff Was, %:eFR Ix1F7 wVCo an A. XMFI AHIIECIIM IYTIL S101A SEDIMENT CONTROL • Perimeter sediment controls are necessary at downsloping property and street edges. Note that sediment controls need to protide containment by taming perimeter controls upslope-Into property. • Perimeter controls can Include mulch socks, mulch berms and/or elft fen". EROSION CONTROL • TopsoO-Site has a minimum of 4-6 inches of topsoil. • Construction entrance -1 to 2' dean amehed rook at a depth of 6 inches. • House Roof Perimeter -Straw mulch at 2 inches deep around house directly below roof line. If house has rain gutters, downp"ls need energy dissipation. • Slopes -Steeper than 4:1 with positive grade to surface waters of the state need fiber blankets and temporary or permanent Beetling. • Swales-Need blankets over final 200'. • Swales-Need check dams if slope is 4:1 or greater. CPPIOF EROSION CONTROL FOR CHAMMINDIVIDUAL LOTS (TYP.) REVISED 2-10 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLATE 53028 RIE NAME: C:\DiG SPECS 53D28 8' r I ITIT mea, w��o�awMh n,.Fa.are., a.>a®,ti, evaLmuv PROJECT NAME /DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 1& CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY PROJECT DESCRIPTION -A 54 LOT SINGLE FAMILY 10' FILTER ASSEMBLY CURB fa` RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION CG 3067 HIGH-FLOW FABRIC MIRAFI FF101 DEVELOPER- NAME ROAD CHAIN m PHONE NUMBER uxruxur,µ `re n"Fx ' CURBANDGUTTERMODEL CONTACT- NAME CG 3667 PHONE NUMBER 6' PERMITTED CONSTRUCTION HOURS-MON.-FRI. 7AM-6PM SATURDAY 9AM-5PM ABSOLUTELY!!! NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, MAINTENANCE OR DELIVERIES ALLOWED ON SITE OUTSIDE OF THESE HOURS. CITY OF CHANHASSEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 952-227-1160 NOTES: 1. SIGN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO POSTS. 2. INSTALL SIGNS AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 3. SIGN SHALL HAVE WHITE BACKGROUND WITH BLACK LETTERING. 4. LETTER SIZE TO FIT 8' X 6' SIGN. affof DEVELOPMENT C' INFO SIGN REVISEDI-10 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I N0'' 5313 FILE NAME:G: ENG SPECS\5313 PL EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS WITH SWALE DRAINAGE LOT 3 DRAINAGE SWALE CURB & GUTTER STREET ENTRANCE STORM SEWER INLET MNGO OR SIMILAR INLET PROTECTION DUAL 5302A SEDIMENT CONTROL • Perimeter sediment controls are necessary at dolrnsloping property and street edges. Note that sediment controls need to provide containment by turning perimeter controls upslope-Into property. • Perimeter controls can Include mulch socks, mulch berms and/or silt fence. EROSION CONTROL • Topsoil -Site has a minimum of 4-6 Inches of topsoil. • Construction entrance -1 to 2" clean crushed rock at a depth of 6 Inches. • House Roof Perimeter-Strow mulch at 2 Inches deep around house directly below the roof Inc. If house has rain gutters, downspouts need energy dissipation. • Slopes -Steeper than 4:1 with positive grade to the waters of the state need fiber blankets and temporary or permanent seeding. • Swales-Need blankets over the final 200'. • Swales-Need check dams if slope is 4:1 or greater. C<FIOF EROSION CONTROL FOR INDIVIDUAL LOT WITH Raw I SWALE DRAINAGE REMISED: 2-10 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PIAL'E N°'` 5302D FILE NAYEG:\DIG\SPECS\5301 Galvanized J bolt w/ wing nut 4), Topsoil, Seed & Mulch or Sod. Draintile Surmountable - Concrete Curb 21.804 DIA. �-11.000 T� o o SLO" O - 0 22$ CK 0 0 0 6 1 g 0 0 0 0 0 S 1 0 0 0 0 1 n 0 0 0 0 0 I e o 0 a/ 1 0 0 O 0 0 1 LL25.306 DIA. 25.681 DIA. 26.806 DIA. ' 4 TAB O.D. 27"INFRASAFE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER -DG (FOR USE WITH DITCH GRATE INLET CASTINGS) STANDARD DETAIL CL 30'/25' 15.5' to Back Silt Fabric Sleeve per MnDOT special provision 3886 30'/25' 15.5' to Back Wear Course to be 1/2" Above Edge of Gutter 1 1 1 3.0% BIOROLL WATTLE/ROCK WEIR TO BE REMOVED WHEN STABILIZED. WATTLE BIOROLL WEIR ROCK & FABRIC WEIR GUARD BOTTOM BOTTOM OF FES OF FES 6' OR 12' BIOR011 6"-12' OF 1X2' TO 2" — SECURED INSIDE FES WASHED ROCK WRAPPED INSIDE A MONOFILAMENT TYPE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INSIDE FES CMOF FLARED END SEDIMENT TRAP CHEM ROCK WEIR/WATTLE ROLL REVISED: 2-10 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLA1E N0'` 5302F Flt£ NAME:G:\ENG\SPEC5\5302A WIMI U.C. 8,609,852 muton.$. 05/31/05 ITIT mea, w��o�awMh n,.Fa.are., a.>a®,ti, evaLmuv �n /DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 1& CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY OVERFLOW 2O -TOP OF CURB BOX 10' FILTER ASSEMBLY CURB fa` CG 3067 HIGH-FLOW FABRIC MIRAFI FF101 �EM ROAD CHAIN m INLET PROTECTION uxruxur,µ `re n"Fx ' CURBANDGUTTERMODEL "'•"-m'� CG 3667 2.0% 1.5 1 1' [�Dr.inleti 1 1/2"—MNDOT 2350 LVWE35030B Tack Coat — 2357 2"—MNDOT 2,350 LVNW35030B 12"—Class 5 Aggregate Base, 100% Crushed 24" MNDOT 3149.2B Select Granular Borrow (*See Note 7) TYPICAL STREET SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) Q 2013 Pioneer Engineering U 2013 Pioneer Engineering 1 1 1 1 1 1-7 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET PIONEERengineering CIVILENGINEERS LANDPLANNERS LANDSURVEYORS LANDSC\PL ARCHI'1'ECrS 1914 2422 Enterprise Drive (6 ax:681-9488 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: reng.c 88 g www.pioneereng.com © 2013 Pioneer Engineering \ /\/ - - -��- „ \ J CBMH-412, \ RE:902.82 \ \\\\ k BLD: 19.10 r \ \ \ INV: 883.72 \ \ \ INV: 895.72 \ \ \ \ 15" RCP 86' ® 4.00% ` CBMH-413 RE: 897.89 BLD: 4.78 IN V.- 896.22 INV- 896.47 12" RCP 29' ® 1.00% CB -414 RE: 901.00 BLD: 4.24 INV:Aar .'Ir 15" RCP ` N, \ 50' ® 1.00% \ \ \ R�: 883.27 BLD, 13.24 \ \ \ \ INV: 87 0.03 �^ INV: 886 18" RCP \ \ \\\ \\ \' \ \\ C 422 \ \ 46' 00,50% ` \ \ � \ ; \ \ RE: 889.33 \ \ \ \ A \ \ BLD: 3.83 \ FES -410 RIM: 871.55 \ � ^ INV: l \ 1 FES -420 RIM: 871.06 INV: \ 1 CBMH-401 RE: 885.68 BLD: 15.92 - CNV: 869.76 ti V: 881.26 15"-R6� 88' ® 0.50% INV. 885.50 \ \ \ 12" RCP \ \ \ 29' ® 1.007.� \ CBMH-421 RE: 889.33 BLD: 19.29 1 \ INV. 870.04 1 1 • �� 1 INV. -885.21 1 1 1 1 1 1 FES -400 A 15" RCP RIM: -0 76 29' ® 1.00% INV. 15" RCP 92' ® 0.50% 15" RCP 8' ® 0.50% Q %,t3mn--+vz RE: 885.68 BLD: 4.13 INV: 881.55 INV: 881.55 i N V: 865.75 CS -1 RE: 871.20 BLD: 8.45 INV: 868.50 INV: 865.75 INV: 867 12" RCP 32' ® 2.19% 12" RCP 23' ® 0.00% CB -403 RE: 885.69 BLD: 4.10 IN V. 881.59 I_ 1 RIVER -'-�I ROCK DRIVE SoV T . _. N 1 2 6" DRAIN TILE l i S-10 \ INV: 868.50 1 OUTLOT G 3 8J6.81 PPe-v OUTLOT A 939.69 PP.-. CB -111 RE: 902.09 BLD: 3.59 12" RCP INV: 898.50 30' ®3.00% CBMH-109 RE: 898.92 BLD: 4.02 INV-. 894.90 INV: 89.90 15" RCP 129' ® 6.27% O15" RCP 29' 00.50%� MH -101 RE: 880.59 5 BLD: 11.91 INV: 868.68 INV: 875.47_ 15" RC-Vt- 134' ® 0,70% - 24" RCP 35' ® 0.50% 6 CBMH-102 / RE: 887.757.75 CBMH-110 RE: 901.631.63 BLD: 4.03 INV-. 897.60 INV: 897.60 1 15" RCP 30' ® 8.90% CBMH-108 RE: 890.83 BLD: 5.80 INV: 885.03 INV: 885.03 INV: 886.80 12" RCP 26' ® 1.00% 13 15" RCP 99' ® 1.35% CBMH-103 RE: 887.75 BLD: 11.20 INV: 876.56 INV-. 883.75 INV: 883.70 15" RCP 49' ® 2.39% _ 6 - 3 2 `4" DRAIN TILE CB -112 RE: 888.79 BLD: 3.50 INV: 885.29 �1 12 0 iU, , 4+00 2 5 00-E - 12289-SHEET-OTIL-S c �BMH-401 \ \ RE: 885.68 A IN BLD: 15.92 CBMH-402 I PPe-w IV. 869.76 RE: 885.68 933.38 PP.-. V: 826 BLD: 4.13 938.91 INV: 881.55 PPT., 9P9 , OUTLOT A 939.69 INV: 881.55 PP.., PP°-" J RE: 895.00 CB -4 -- _ BLD: 3.59 4\ RE: 885.69 INV: 891.42 BLD: 4.10 12" RCP U \ a INV: 881.59 CB -111 19' ®0.50% - 15" RCP RE: 902.09 29' ® 1.00% \ BLD: 3.59 �3,ea-1� -� 14+00 CBMH-213 Lel �d +o I_ 12" RCP INV: 898.50 -1--1__ RE: 896.59 o Ld Q I _ 30' ® 3.00% Uv <� s+Do BLD: 5.27 + r &R�V 8,0p -� INV: 891.46 - 4 X' ERR I s / INV: 891.32 N � K DRIVE ' 11 ° 15" RCP 1 \ a 8' ® 0.50%- �} 15" RCP RE: 901.63 1 CBMH .63 3 5 6 29 00.50% 2 BLD: 4.03 CBMH-212 0 / 2 INV: 897.60 CBMH-109 2 RE: 896.59 3 RE: 898.92 INV:197.60 BLD: 5.27 L 3 BLD: 4.02 15" RCP INV: 891.32 O INV: 894.9030 ®8.90% 7 INV: 891.32 %// 4 3 INV: 894.90 - 4 CBMH-108 CBS- .16 15" RCP eK RE: 890.83 t L J RE: 887.50153 ®5 BLD: 5.80 -- - - - �� BLD: 3.50 .19% \ 5 15" RCP INV: 885.03 INV: 884.00 s. 129' ® 6.27% _ INV: 885.03_'-���r'' y 2 STMH-221 INV: 886.80 �4" DRAIN TILE �- BLD: 4.64 F -15 6" DRAIN TILE `� RCE 888 79 ^```�•\ 1 RE 887 43 S��j I s INV: 886.36 6 INV: 865.75 ,.,� - - z 12" RCP BLD: 3.50 BLD: 6.70 Tiy INV: 886.36 M=- O " 26' ® 1.00% INV: 885.29 INV: 880.72 CB -223 RE:8 CS -1 i �� 15 RCP N 10 12" RCP INV: 883.40 RE: 890.42 F -1 \ 29 ® 0.50% g 15" RCP3 11 45' ® 1.32% 3 12" RCP ` BLD: 3.52 INV: 883.40 INV: 868.50 = BLD- 8 45 INV: 868.50 RRE 0 59 5 99' ® 1.35% 12 9 160' ® 3.66% INV:886.90 INV: 865.75 t I BLD: 11.91 CBMH-103 18' RCP - - _ Z 4 7 _ = OUTLOT G INV: 868.68 RE: 887.75 45 ® 0.50% / 12" RCP INV: 867.80 - - INV: 875.47- - - - - - BLD: 11.20 8 / SCSI 15" RCP INV: 876.56 INV: 880.50 29' ®1.00% BLD $0 55 INV: 883.75 / \ ��25 01.007. - � CB $H 222 ' - - - - - - 15" RCP INV: 883.70 f INV: 880.50 R 90.42 12" RCP / 134' - - / BLD: 3.81 32' ® 2.19% \ 24" RCP ® 0.70% 15" RCP 15" RCP /f INV: 876.00 INV: 886.61 8 i 49' ® 2.39% 1 3+00 RCP 35 ®0.50% 6 - 2*p0- - - 35' ® 0.50% i 32p ®0.00 5 INV: 886.61 12" RCP 1 <�,,°° /J bUTLOT D \ / / CBMH-102 0 06 -� - 23 ®0.00% RE: 887.75 +oo \�� / FES -253 BLD: 11.34 ` EE� 8 \ ( CBMH-201 INV: 876.00 1 FES-22o N� 50 6 9 \\ I INV: 876.41 S(R INV: 876.41 / RE: 885.01 i i � BLD: 4.29 MH -252 mss, INV: 880.72 10 RE: 885.09 INV: 881.21 /i CB -106 " CBMH-105 13 BLD: 4.76 7 RE: 888.73 15 RCP RE: 888.94 INV: 880.33 BLD: 3.50 32' ® 1.00% BLD: 4.03 15" RCP33 FES -200 INV: 885.23 INV: 884.91` INV: 880.50 // 7 \ �/o INV: 884.91 147' ®5.56% \If.,� /,' 6" DRAIN TIL 11 12 CBMH-25114 r \\� �� 8 RE: 876.95 441 �- 11 � BLD: 9.55 18" RCP 15" RCP INV: 867.40 RE: 885.01 PoBLD: 3.51 o ' 45' ® 0.50% / .� 220' ® 0.50% INV: 872.14 INV: 881.50 9 d 12 C.9 4i 15" RCP °� 29' ® 1.00% 10 8 a H °Jw 1 \ CB -104 _ 13 RE: 881.16 INV: 867.00 15" RCP BLD: 3.50 ��� 80' ® 0.50% %0 �o° 14 INV: 877.66 10 9 2 15 ' �`. \ \ / ` ` \ CBMH-312 RE: 888.57 Do BLD: 9.97 16 FES - R) INV: 878 60 691 PP" 893.0 , PPS_, INV: 868.00 15" RCP �/'/ r9•� �� INV 00 1 912" RCP x/l, a/ \` 18' ®2.82% \ �• \\ \I ----\\ \`` \n 6" DRAIN TILERE 8 4 2.00 \\\\ 1 it it s`\`` ��% j� `\\` \\ �BLD: 7.00 \'-I J \ �/ 24" RCP INV: 50 INV: 868.00 0 25 50 100 - 1 It ' , `� `� ' ,/ / �`�\ .\ ak 60' ®13.44% GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET \ �`: \ 5 PI ONEER�e/y�/'ineei i/�/(�./�y:. \'� I O c7 00 -ENG -I 12289-SHEET-UTIL-STRM CIVIL ENGINEERS LANDPLANNERS LAND SL RVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS I herebycertifyy that this Ian was prepared b Revisions 2422 Enterprise Drive (6Fax: ax: 681- 681-99488488 me or under my direct supervision and that IName Date 05-17-2013 LENNAR amadul Licensed Professional Engineer Keith A. Willenbring Designed NAP PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER JEURISSEN PARCEL Mendota Heights, MN 55120 w-ww.pioneereng.com y g 25504 16305 36TH AVENUE N SUITE 600 I S OF 15 under the laws of the State of Minnesota Reg. Na Dare OS -17-2013 Drawn Kgvb' PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 ANHASSEN, MINNESOTA © 2013 Pioneer Engineering If It \,t 114 \ F s i /l `\.\ i� l� ' •- l 1L4 xl� It 1;A1 Dpi 1 f/ Ir �/` f 1 i j _. •L,.,...✓' ..✓ ,.y ....%'' �'' ./.-�' i 1 `ti , It ,. , t f s, It t: t�`,( It � � t t i � i � 1 i�� `t �t S'•y{; \2';1 `7 � ` � ,� ?t�l T F i, / 1 \ `1 �\\\�T,�,� , � \ \ \ `��\ ` \, 1�.� --_.. * A,l _._ �J'•..,, .e \` \ �` 1` ; � f ( f � �/ / l /t JI r {{ i3 � iI , �t , V ���'`��' t i 4�,1�,:,� ', � ,i+ �"^,„�._ ..` WIN 6/' t ,,' / C c_.. I r y 't .a T 1 V ' i �••,__ t F `-'9( �l , i j $ ---- —�— , e A ,�J h \ p \ t v tt YF 'i t _._../ `---• ” C,J T \1 \ ., `�/ . y J-/ "..^,i .I /W i` 1 I ' f i j 1 / {�\',{y l ...,� J ,yf� � r ',, .� ,' / i I l � s5 rJ,) j a , � ;•S ✓. /�� / ,' -1i it J 4_ ��_�'�J;-J 'I `' JJ 'v, �```�.` � ✓'/' �" ;✓ /� ,/�,✓; y\ .. e , meg` �\'�\ `;�\`:'`4\`�, , \'. � d :., .1 .,,,.7, t/r> �''/�� S r \\•,-."1"„ � •.1 *,, \_ \Lc`k�✓/! =141 �i� F ;,i �` � / f % J _ . j �/ , ii / _ .. "'�\. � \� � i.} v.; , i l ',\` ^al '-/ e�' r ) � ` ~ `h)v i^' ' *.� ,� � � / , %; IA �yl '.\ �--\`�'=`1 ,;'W4``"`�-.-: L. 2 ` +.✓gp� 0-1 ?\ � ?,(�''yll +r ,`� -y�)[�a0 �\\\�y��...\� �\.._..,.,, \\� � � 1. � _-� ---•. ' d : /ti, / ! ,. � � r i rl� ! )' � ter,,--a,'�~�, �� � \ - •, /-- f \ ti •V.''i f ,>, �i 1 Ij � r � `^,\ '' \� V~\-„ \\�—'• `ti.�.,._ `\�-�-'w,� -�� / f /f /-'"/•__. •t r\{\/ -, �,://l; ,' ; � ' ,'t_: y: ,_`��•4 '\,.,\ \.. � �/ � � i `l a�>,'/, ; 4v _ `\�`�,,✓^`��\`�`"� \�'! �\\�\\�\�„i'�'. ��\,�`� ,� %/ ,� / 'I i J / Vit`\ ti��111 �,J ",� ':,,,, J" h" L'���� /Ay, 4:. �,.�,` -%l_' �JJ)�:�`/'`r! r,/ �!� 1 r ` \:,.,`w. �^ `l,g' 11 4' r.\ \'� y r' i / i lj. , ; i .\ i,i'1,:°',�l ,`,`_ ` i .\\`tel\ i� L -- f `•I X' /- �'/ f' i ` `.`�. (,'!?'%Lr--�•-\\'\ V 0._s r ,+ i 1 l { 1-. Tl�� � ��/1 t t ,%'"-^-.!`%'"\4 \� \ � ~ .�...4"'. �.-• / , , / r � \�, 4t �. , i �. \ a; .. 1. `� , \ i\. \ ` 1 � /„ , / r / `\.^�� ( � 1 S I-. (fr l �%�� J-...r\`�� ,,, 4 \ �`.-\„"_'"! / / � f i � (i i ��� � r`,'.`_ V`�,-v�~ 1� `` _r. .. 4 `.� '" ' /� ``l. '✓ /i l'//, i� . \( E tom`", ,,,� --; \ `) , 1 ./' - \- / / / r � , /^ , / ; ;1 �' ,7 1 ✓ \�'.�-�= �.�^-' J '' -``'. .; ,, , ' \\��r-.,'/%/��,i��,/ `1 _ _ ✓""\� ✓ /r o ,.��.. '\ `.t�� � 1 �3.••• .. .�„� �� �,.,- /r'l (/`/�-��/{� \ wY `\\ / /' j /%/�% a/'` �, R� IT 1p � /�% BF- r �T �” ., ....� '�\ \ ,\ !1 I { \ J��� 'ji Jr/ �' if-�� /„ p'' ''�-'.r � * � Z.t�. j- �"�`,\� �; ✓� '...��.,� i . J. _�'� �r\G ju 1 l I �, / j .. ' � �' ..-�_ i '-�`• ter, ;, � , ✓ itis �t, Qi^� •� .\5,.. ') �'T:',� >� % % 'i /i//.; - r----4�—a� -_� .�.,'� 1 -+. i Y ) r/j / I r I f ( /' r > S' �- �__ .^i r .r/- ��✓/- ! t ( / ` l / . ' J' j' .:i'`-�j�, ry „./" ""„'\ \\ T � / r � l � i t £ i 41 1 y � � r-.., � � '� // f � r ,1 � ,s i � (� .�/ [ `� � t�. L' _ • r �., ) ,�� \ 1 � /j ' t i 4 � { \ 'i t I ! l� � ( / ....-i - .-/ / �./ °%/ 1 r( ( / ,"' a� { C�, ` � ✓.�i � G'.f.. t s' ,'�, I ; r 1, ri... a Itt PI ONEERengineering CIVILENGINEFRS LANDPLANNERS LANDSURVEYORS LANDSCAPEARCHLTECI'S 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Heights, MN 55120 Fax: eng.c 88 Mendota Hei S www.pioneereng.com © 2013 Pioneer Engineering KEY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME ROOT QUANTITY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS D p � OVERSTORY TREES WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED p AM AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ACER FREEMANII X 'AUTUMN BLAZE' 2.5" BFB 17 O HB HACKBERRY/CELTiS OCCIDENTALIS 2.5" B&B 10 WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF HL THORNLESS HONEYLOCUST GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 2.5" B&B 17 COMPACTED BACKFILL RB RIVER BIRCH/BETULA NIGRA 'HERITAGE' (CLUMP) 10' B&B 13 p SL SENTRY LINDEN TiLIA AMERICANA 'SENTRY 2.5" B&B 8 �`"j� J \ y� SHREDDED WOOD MULCH MIN. 4' SM SIENNA GLEN MAPLE/ACER FREEMANII X 'SIENNA GLEN' 2.5" B&B 15 �� COMPACTED BACKFILL D ,> PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO p EVERGREEN TREES OF THE SECOND WATERING THE ROOT FLARE IS AT p • p BS BLACK HILLS SPRUCE/PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA 7' B&B 49 7' AVERAGE HEIGHT, 6' MINIMUM EXCESSIVE. FINISHED GRADE c . o TOP jOF THE BASKET OR TREES ON PRIVATE LOTS TO BE PLANTED AFTER HOMES ARE BUILT. CONIFERS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 6' IN HEIGHT WITH AN AVERAGE OF 7'. FRONT YARD DECIDUOUS TREES MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 2.511 . ALL OTHER DECIDUOUS TREES TO BE MINIMUM 1.5" WITH AN AVERAGE OF 2.5" TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED TREES: 129 REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES: 116 (SEE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN FOR CALCULATIONS.) DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL D. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND TRIM OUT DEAD W000 AND D p � c WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED p FILL VOIDS. TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A p O CUTS LEADER. DO NOT PAINT INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SET PLANT ON WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF CUTS. o D INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST COMPACTED BACKFILL p . o p p BE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SET PLANT ON p o SATURATE ROOT BALL AND UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL p �`"j� J \ y� SHREDDED WOOD MULCH MIN. 4' PLANTING HOLE. OR THOROUGHLY PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH BURLAP AND �� COMPACTED BACKFILL D ,> PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO p C OF THE SECOND WATERING THE ROOT FLARE IS AT p • p ryp UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE ,Y . apo EXCESSIVE. FINISHED GRADE c . o TOP jOF THE BASKET OR o THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL SHREDDED WOOD MULCH MIN. 4" PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING D o DEEP (DO NOT PLACE MULCH HOLE WITH BURLAP AND AGAINST TRUNK OF TREE). WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), TOP OF THE BALL INTACT. BACKFlLL WITHIN 6 REMO ALL TWINE. E PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF BACKFILL SOIL BREAK DOWN THE TOP OF ROOTBALL. SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO SIDES OF HOLE WHEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE PLANTING. .•. , 1,.-'1. BACKFlLUNG. TOPYj OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS : GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOPOF THE BALL. OV REMOVE ALL TWINE. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND ` SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 2-3 TIMES BALL DIAMETER CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL 2-3 TIMES BALL DIAMETER LANDSCAPE NOTES - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NSIT THE PROJECT SITE TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID- - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF PROPOSED PHYSICAL START DATE AT LEAST 7 DAYS IN ADVANCE. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIELD VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ON THE PROJECT SITE WITH GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 1-800-252-1166 PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF EXISTING UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFUCTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. - GRADING TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS. - NO PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. - ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS FOUND IN THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN -AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. - ALL CONTAINER MATERIAL TO BE GROWN IN THE CONTAINER A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) MONTHS PRIOR TO PLANTING ON SITE. - DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL NOT BE STAKED, BUT THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST GUARANTEE STANDABILITY TO A WIND SPEED OF 60 M.P.H. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM GUARANTEE OF ONE YEAR ONE TIME REPLACEMENT ON NEW PLANT MATERIALS. GUARANTEE SHALL BE AGREED UPON BY DEVELOPER/BUILDER AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR- - THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER INSTALLATION. - IF THERE IS A DESCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND THE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLANT LIST. THE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLAN WILL TAKE PRECEDENCE. -THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE. - COMMERCIAL GRADE POLY LAWN EDGING SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE NOTED. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO THE SITE CAUSED BY THE PLANTING OPERATION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS CLEAN UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHiq E ACCESS TO BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. - STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED FILL VOIDS. TWIGS. Qg _NOT CUT A LEADER. DO NOT PAINT WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF CUTS l ` INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SET PLANT ON J L 3� SATURATE ROOT BALL AND UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY ! PLANTING HOLE. COMPACTED BACKFILL Yr Y ` PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS SOIL INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT r/i je OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE 4J EXCESSIVE. FINISHED GRADE. �`"j� J \ y� SHREDDED WOOD MULCH MIN. 4' G W D\ PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH BURLAP AND �� DEEP (DO NOT PLACE MULCH ,> AGAINST TRUNK OF TREE). WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), ✓ '�- INTACT. BACKFILL WITHIN '' ` PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF �� �.' Y BACKFILL SOIL. BREAK DOWN THE TOP OF ROOTBALL, v,ya, �"''�' SIDES OF HOLE WHEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE BACKFILLING. TOP jOF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER 15 GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLJA5P AND NAILS FROM TOP OF THE BALL 6 REMO ALL TWINE. E SCARIFY BOTTOM AND ' SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. .•. , 1,.-'1. 2-3 TIMES BALL DIAMETER LANDSCAPE NOTES - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NSIT THE PROJECT SITE TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID- - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF PROPOSED PHYSICAL START DATE AT LEAST 7 DAYS IN ADVANCE. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIELD VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ON THE PROJECT SITE WITH GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 1-800-252-1166 PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF EXISTING UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFUCTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. - GRADING TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS. - NO PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. - ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS FOUND IN THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN -AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. - ALL CONTAINER MATERIAL TO BE GROWN IN THE CONTAINER A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) MONTHS PRIOR TO PLANTING ON SITE. - DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL NOT BE STAKED, BUT THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST GUARANTEE STANDABILITY TO A WIND SPEED OF 60 M.P.H. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM GUARANTEE OF ONE YEAR ONE TIME REPLACEMENT ON NEW PLANT MATERIALS. GUARANTEE SHALL BE AGREED UPON BY DEVELOPER/BUILDER AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR- - THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER INSTALLATION. - IF THERE IS A DESCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND THE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLANT LIST. THE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLAN WILL TAKE PRECEDENCE. -THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE. - COMMERCIAL GRADE POLY LAWN EDGING SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE NOTED. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO THE SITE CAUSED BY THE PLANTING OPERATION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. - THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS CLEAN UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHiq E ACCESS TO BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. - STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 4 A" �0 V X' V `i,x 0 X\N "o, YJ PIONEERengineering CIVR GA RS LANDnANN S LANDSURWYORS LANDSCAMARCMMM (651) 681-1914 2422 Enterprise Drive Fax: 681-9488 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 www.pioneereng.com @ 2013 Pioneer Engineering Gross project area: 25.8 acres Wetland Area: 0.6 acres Net area: 25.2 acres Gross Canopy Area: 5.1 acres Canopy within wetland area: 0.6 acres Net Canopy Area:[475 �acres Baseline Canopy Coverage: 17.9% (4.5/25.2) Canopy to be saved: 12.5 acres I Canopy to be removed: 2.0 acres 1.2 (city multiplier/penalty for falling under required canopy)=2.4 acres Net Canopy Area after grading (and 1.2 penalty): 2.1 acres (4.5-2.4 Minimum Canopy Coverage Requirement: 20% of net project area of 25.2 = 5.0 acres Credited remaining existing Canopy of 2.1 acres Required additional Canopy Coverage to be mitigated: 2.9 acres (126,324 sf) Each additional tree = 1,089 sf Additional trees required to meet Canopy Coverage Requirement: 116 (126324/1089) See Landscape plan for proposed tree locations and plant schedule TREE CANOPY TO BE SAVED TREE CANOPY TO BE REMOVED 112289 TREE CANOPY WITHIN WETLAND AREA ............ TREE CANOPY TO BE REMOVED 112289 A V, \ \ j i At tt1R� i 33gg77 , IC i•xt, `� opda � 1 " , — � j � n '1 ri ♦ /.r�r � � /j i J' � "� .`.. +a,_ A`�� ^1��,.�' 1A'\�1��'t,. l _ `�..._' \ \. a, y�\6Y��✓jr}" 1 �'^' ~ � ' /'/ ~ �i /�tl�l� 1��/'�:� %/r / r`':'� /J " , %, % , : ! f j r' 1 f '-; - '� �"•� TM�\� i \\��-_ :; l' `w. � �-y � j' % i / r i' f i f j f j 1/ /'� __ / ".r/ %�� r ) S / 4,�` / ^� ✓-� `'\ \ "e.'+•\`.,, �\. \ "'�. <` % r r f �_,,,,,. \ �`•.. �\ �'R r. �/ /i / j rjjr%{{s / t Zytitt I i / r r:I ` Q \� ��,,, f 7t r :� ,,, -. ��--"0�,-2"1\� "•1�l { � \ }}'� vim\ ��, ` � / r / � t J ,,% � \ ,�•'(}i t \ � .Y,; l .� =r % ---'`� may\ \ �.' °.\'`' ""' j i/ j _ ^__.,-r.r "-,•J �;• //' 7/}/~! I ,^' ;'' \� 1 ��� 1 {�.� - ~'t \ \�\\ � \\����\`\`�— � j lt! t � r'//�r�/�/r// r�S/~ ✓N (/� C` l `l 5 1 Q t \ ') \ •,1�7(�tlllt.}iljci;f'• # ,J `;"/ j, j''�..�i,.'/�/��1/��/,��5/ \ i'� / r�` �` PIONEERenginming CIVIL ENGD EERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURV YORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2422 Enterprise Drive (651)681-1914 Heights, MN 55120 Fax: reng.c 88 Mendota Hei S www.pioneereng.com © 2013 Pioneer Engineering 'moi Ip � ry Tag Common Name Scientific Name DBH Status 1301 Red Oak Quercus rubra 10 Remove 1302 Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa 7 Remove 1303 Bur Oak Quercusmacrocarpa 7 Remove 1304 Red Oak Quercus rubra 11 Remove 130S Red Oak Quercus rubra 7 Remove 1306 Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa 33 Remove 1307 American Elm Ulmus americano 9 Remove 1308 Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa 24 Remove 1309 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Remove 1310 Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa 40 Remove 1311 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Remove 1312 Boxelder Acernegundo 7 Remove 1313 Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa 41 Remove 1314 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Remove 1315 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Remove 1316 American Elm Ulmusamericana 9 Remove 1317 Boxelder Acernegundo 21 Remove 1318 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Remove 1319 American Elm Ulmus americano 21 Remove 1320 Boxelder Acernegundo 14 Remove 1321 Boxelder Acernegundo 11 Remove 1322 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Remove 1323 Boxelder Acernegundo 14 Remove 1324 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Remove 1325 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1326 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1327 Boxelder Acernegundo 21 Remove 1328 American Elm Ulmus americana 14 Remove 1329 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Remove 1330 Boxelder Acernegundo 7 Remove 1331 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Remove 1332 Boxelder Acernegundo 7 Remove 1333 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Remove 1334 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Remove 1335 Boxelder Acernegundo 11 Remove 1336 Boxelder Acernegundo 18 Remove 1337 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1338 Boxelder Acernegundo 37 Remove 1339 Boxelder Acernegundo 33 Remove 1340 American Elm Ulmus americana 7 Remove 1341 American Elm Ulmus americana 8 Remove 1342 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Remove 1343 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Remove 1344 Bur Oak Quercusmacrocarpa 24 Remove 1345 American Elm Ulmus americana 11 Remove 1346 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Remove 1347 American Elm Ulmus americana 7 Remove 1348 Boxelder Acernegundo 21 Remove 1349 Boxelder Acernegundo 15 Remove 1350 Boxelder Acernegundo 16 Remove 1351 American Elm Ulmus americana 9 Remove 1352 American Elm Ulmus american a 9 Remove 1353 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Remove 1354 Boxelder Acernegundo 7 Remove 1355 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1356 Boxelder Acernegundo 19 Remove 1357 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Remove 1358 Boxelder Acernegundo 16 Remove 1359 Boxelder Acernegundo 18 Remove 1360 Boxelder Acernegundo 7 Remove 1361 Boxelder Acernegundo 11 Remove 1362 Boxelder Acernegundo 18 IRemove 1363 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1364 Boxelder Acernegundo 26 Remove 1365 Boxelder Acernegundo 21 Remove 1366 Boxelder Acernegundo 22 Remove 1367 Boxelder Acernegundo 24 Remove 1368 Boxelder Acernegundo 17 Remove 1369 Boxelder Acernegundo 15 Remove 1370 Boxelder Acernegundo 23 Remove 1371 Boxelder Acernegundo 29 Remove 1372 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Remove 1373 Boxelder Acernegundo 7 Remove 1374 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Remove 1375 Boxelder Acernegundo 11 Remove 1376 Boxelder Acernegundo it Remove 1377 Boxelder Acernegunda 12 Remove 1378 American Elm Ulmus americana 11 Remove 1379 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Remove 1380 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Remove 1381 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Remove 1382 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Remove 1383 American Elm Ulmusamericana 7 Remove 1384 American Elm litmus americana 9 Remove 1385 Boxelder lAcernegundo 35 Remove 1386 American Elm I Ulmus americana 11 Remove 1387 lBoxelder Acernegundo 7 Remove 1388 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Remove 1389 Boxelder Acernegunda 17 Remove 1390 Eastern Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana 6 Remove 1391 Eastern Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana 6 Remove 1392 Eastern Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana 6 Remove 1393 Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa 8 Save 1394 Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa 10 Save 1395 Green Ash froxinLis pennsylvanica 8 Save 1396 Green Ash Fro x in us pen n sylva n ica 12 Save 1397 American Elm Ulmus americana 13 Save 1398 Red Oak Quercus rubra 10 Save 1399 Red Oak Quercus rubra 12 Remove 1400 Green Ash Froxinus pennsylvanica 16 Remove 1401 American Elm Ulmus americana 22 Remove 1402 American Elm Ulmus americana 17 Remove 1403 American Elm Ulmus americana 16 Remove 1404 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Save 1405 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Save 1406 Boxelder Acernegundo 11 Save 1407 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Save 1408 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Save 1409 American Elm Ulmus americana 8 Save 1410 Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa 19 Save 1411 Missing Tag 0 1412 Boxelder Acernegundo 18 Save 1413 Boxelder Acernegundo 11 Save 1414 Boxelder Acernegundo 15 Save 1415 Missing Tag 0 Save 1416 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Save 1417 American Elm Ulmus americana 17 Save 1418 American Elm Ulmus americano 11 Save 1419 Missing Tag 0 1420 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Save 1421 American Elm Ulmus americana 15 Save 1422 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Remove 1423 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1424 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1425 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Remove 1426 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Remove 1427 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Remove 1428 American Elm Ulmus americana 20 Remove 1429 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Remove 1430 Boxelder Acernegundo 7 Remove 1431 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Remove 1432 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Save 1433 .Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Save 1434 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1435 American Elm Ulmus americana 12 Remove 1436 American Elm Ulmus americana 7 Remove 1437 American Elm U/mus americana 16 Remove 1438 American Elm Ulmus americana 17 Remove 1439 American Elm Ulmus americana 10 Remove 1440 American Elm Ulmus americana 11 Remove 1441 American Elm Ulmus americana 8 Remove 1442 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1443 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1444 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Remove 1445 Boxelder Acernegundo 6 Remove 1446 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Remove 1447 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Remove 1448 Boxelder Acernegundo 11 Remove 1449 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Remove 1450 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Remove 1451 Boxelder Acernegundo 32 Remove 1452 Boxelder Acernegundo 15 Remove 1453 American Elm Ulmus americana 13 Remove 1454 Boxelder Acernegundo 7 Remove 1455 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Save 1456 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Save 1457 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Save 1458 Boxelder Acernegundo 15 Save 1459 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Save 1460 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Save 1461 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Save 1462 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Save 1463 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Save 1464 Boxelder Acernegundo 20 Save 1465 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Save 1466 Boxelder Acernegundo 23 Save 2130 112289 T2, OF 2, JEURISSEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner, of the following described property situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, to wit: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota. Together with: That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, said Carver County described as follows: 1ST ADDITION SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE CtTyOFC4ANKASS&, RECEIVED MAY 17 2013 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Peter J. Hawkinson, Registered Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 42299 Beginning at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter; thence north along the west line of said Southwest The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate by Peter J. Hawkinson, Minnesota License No. 42299, was acknowledged before me Quarter, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence southeasterly, to a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter, which lies 30.00 feet easterly of said southwest corner, as measured along said south line; thence westerly, along this day of 20 said south line, a distance of 30.00 feet, to said southwest corner and the point of beginning. Except all that part of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the north quarter corner of said Section 26; thence on an assumed bearing of North 88 degrees 03 minutes 46 seconds West, along the north line of said Section 26, a distance of 1634.23 feet; thence South 55 degrees 00 minutes 18 seconds East, a distance of 366.71 feet; thence South 00 degrees 08 minutes 52 seconds East, a distance of 478.28 feet; thence South 45 degrees 16 minutes 11 seconds West, a distance of 201.73 feet; thence South 38 degrees 08 minutes 54 seconds West, a distance of 606.64 feet, to the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways and the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by as liability company, on behalf of said company. B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC day of , 20 of B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Minnesota Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA This plat of JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20 , and is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. All monuments will be set as day of , 20 , specified by the City Council and as stated on this plat according to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 505. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA By: Mayor By: Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR, Carver County, Minnesota Pursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been approved this day of 20 By John E. Freemyer Carver County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER, Carver County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 in Laurie Engelen, County Auditor/Treasurer COUNTY RECORDER, Carver County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this plat of JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION was filed this day of 20 , at _ o'clock M. as Document No. B y. Mark Lundgren, County Recorder PI$NEERengineering CI ENGLNEERS LAND PLAN 4W LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCNUECIS SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION, that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been or will be correctly set within one year as indicated on the plat; that all water boundaries and wet lands as defined in MS 505.01, Subd. 3, existing as of the date of this certification are shown and labeled on the plat; and that all public ways are shown and labeled on the plat. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Peter J. Hawkinson, Registered Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 42299 Beginning at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter; thence north along the west line of said Southwest The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate by Peter J. Hawkinson, Minnesota License No. 42299, was acknowledged before me Quarter, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence southeasterly, to a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter, which lies 30.00 feet easterly of said southwest corner, as measured along said south line; thence westerly, along this day of 20 said south line, a distance of 30.00 feet, to said southwest corner and the point of beginning. Except all that part of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the north quarter corner of said Section 26; thence on an assumed bearing of North 88 degrees 03 minutes 46 seconds West, along the north line of said Section 26, a distance of 1634.23 feet; thence South 55 degrees 00 minutes 18 seconds East, a distance of 366.71 feet; thence South 00 degrees 08 minutes 52 seconds East, a distance of 478.28 feet; thence South 45 degrees 16 minutes 11 seconds West, a distance of 201.73 feet; thence South 38 degrees 08 minutes 54 seconds West, a distance of 606.64 feet, to the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways and the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by as liability company, on behalf of said company. B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC day of , 20 of B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Minnesota Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA This plat of JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20 , and is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. All monuments will be set as day of , 20 , specified by the City Council and as stated on this plat according to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 505. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA By: Mayor By: Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR, Carver County, Minnesota Pursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been approved this day of 20 By John E. Freemyer Carver County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER, Carver County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 in Laurie Engelen, County Auditor/Treasurer COUNTY RECORDER, Carver County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this plat of JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION was filed this day of 20 , at _ o'clock M. as Document No. B y. Mark Lundgren, County Recorder PI$NEERengineering CI ENGLNEERS LAND PLAN 4W LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCNUECIS SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS CITY OF CHANHASSEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1160 FAX (952) 227-1170 TO: Neaton & Puklich, PLLP 7975 Stone Creek Drive Suite 120 Chanhassen, MN 55317 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter 0 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO, 1/2/20 PC 2013-13 ATTENTION Patrick J. Neaton RE Peterson -Jacques Farm Company (Camden Ridge) ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 1/2/20 2019-18 Certified Resolution 1 Form 8283 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ® Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS "PICKED UP BY STAFF FROM NEATON & PUKLICH PLLP" Please contact Todd Gerhardt at 952-227-1119 or tgerhardt@ci.chanhassen.mn.us with any questions regarding the attached. Thank you. COPY TO: SIGNED' Y.�f'Y� �' Jean Steckling, (952) 227-1106 SG:NR"j Ifenclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. NEATON & PUKLICH, P.L.L.P. PATRICK J. NEATON MICHAEL L. PUKLICH HAND DELIVERY Mr. Todd Gerhardt City Manager City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 December 30, 2019 RE: Peterson -Jacques Faun Company, LLC Donation to City of Chanhassen Dear Mr. Gerhardt: LEGAL ASSISTANTS. LORI B. NOLAN COURTNEY M. OLSON LIZ A. NEATON In connection with the April 8, 2019 City of Chanhassen Resolution, the City accepted the therein referenced real estate donation from the Peterson -Jacques Farm Company, LLC, and resolved in paragraph 3 thereof, to have the City Clerk of Chanhassen sign the IRS Form 8283. I have therefore prepared the attached Form 8283 on behalf of the Peterson -Jacques Farm Company, LLC. I therefore request that the City of Chanhassen complete the Form (at the bottom of page 2 thereof) with the authorized signature, title, date and employer identification number. As soon as that has been accomplished, please have your staff call our office and someone from our office will pick up the signed document. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Yours very truly, PJN:ln Encl. cc: Peterson -Jacques Farm Company, LLC 7975 STONE CREEK DRIVE. SUITE 120 1 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1 PHONE 952.258.8444 1 FAX 952.258.9988 0 CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) 0 I, Todd Gerhardt, duly appointed City Clerk for the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of Resolution No. 2019-18 "Accepting Donations of Real Property, Planning Case File No. 2013-13" adopted by the Chanhassen City Council on April 8, 2019 with the original copy now on file in my office and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof. Witness my hand and official seal at Chanhassen, Minnesota, this 2"a day of January, 2020. odd Gerhardt, City Clerk ..�`. ,\ 0.••111 5 .: 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: Aaril 8, 2019 RESOLUTION NO: 2019-18 MOTION BY: Coleman SECONDED BY: Tiornhom RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATIONS OF REAL PROPERTY WHEREAS, B. Elmer Family Fames, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, is the fee owner ("Owner") of real property located within the City of Chanhassen ("City") legally described as follows: Outlots B, C and D, Jeurissen Ridge, Carver County, Minnesota (the "Elmer Farms Property"); and WHEREAS, Peterson -Jacques Farm Company, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, is the fee owner ("Owner") of real property located within the City of Chanhassen ("City") legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" (the `Peterson -Jacques Property'); WHEREAS, Owners desire to donate the Elmer Farms Property and the Peterson -Jacques Property to the City, and WHEREAS, such donation will benefit the citizens of the City, and WHEREAS, Owners have executed Warranty Deeds for the purpose of transferring their ownership interest in the Elmer Farms Property and the Peterson -Jacques Property to the City, and the Warranty Deeds will be recorded upon adoption of this Resolution at the sole expense of the City; and WHEREAS, the proposed acquisition of the Subject Properties has no relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 requires that donations of real property or personal property be accepted by a resolution of the City Council adopted by a two-thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Council hereby accepts the donations of the Elmer Farms Property and the Peterson -Jacques Property by the Owners. 20148M 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" (Peterson -Jacques Farm Company, LLC Property) That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter, also being comer B9, Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-43; thence on an assumed bearing of South 88 degrees 36 minutes 18 seconds East, along the North line of said Southwest Quarter, a distance of 66.03 feet to comer B10, said Plat, also being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 00 degrees 26 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 263.90 feet to corner B11, said Plat; thence South 80 degrees 01 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 353.78 feet to comer B12, said Plat; thence North 68 degrees 45 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 230.69 feet to comer B13, said Plat; thence North 38 degrees 08 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 284.29 feet to said North line; thence North 88 degrees 36 minutes 18 seconds West, along said North line, a distance of 741.29 feet to the point of beginning, Carver County, Minnesota. I``►17 That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 09 minutes 11 seconds West, along the South line of said Southwest Quarter, a distance of 480.51 feet to corner B2042, Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-43; thence North 51 degrees 30 minutes 35 seconds East a distanceof 141.36 feet to comer B-41, said Plat; thence Northeasterly a distance of 275.09 feet along a tangential curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 400.00 feet and a central angle of 39 degrees 24 minutes 11 seconds to comer B40, said Plat; thence North 72 degrees 19 minutes 49 seconds East, not tangent to said curve, a distance of 40.07 feet to comer B39, said Plat; thence Easterly a distance of 192.03 feet along a tangential curve concave to the South having a radius of 723.50 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 12 minutes 26 seconds to the East line of said Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 08 minutes 59 seconds East, not tangent to the last described curve, and along said East line, a distance of 369.90 feet to the point of beginning, Carver County, Minnesota. (abstract) 20148M fog 8283 Non4b Charitable Contributions (nor December 2011) ►Attach to your tax retum it you claimed a total deduction DeoMhent of the T_" of over $500 for all contributed property. IM.1 Rermra � ► Infnrmwdon about Form 8293 and its separate instructions is at W JM OMB No. 1545-0908 Attachment 5eonance W. 155 Section A. Donated Property of $5,000 or Less and Publicly Traded Securities—List in this section only items (or groups of similar items) for which you claimed a deduction of $5,000 or less. Also list publicly traded securities even if the deduction is more than $5,000 (see instructions). Irrfnrsnafinn nn tlnnMad ProowrIv—If vruh need mnre Roar. attach a statement. 0 r� (dl) ose,dthe IN Date.0*.Vd M Ifooracµrted IBI Dorpfs cot Ih) Fairmvketvalue 8 Me" iced to aetenrip coraddRbn try donor lap.. yr.) by donor aadlusted bass (see instructiors) llha lakmatket wbe ® Partial Interests and Restricted Use Property—Complete lines 2a through 2e if you gave less than an entire interest in a property listed in Part I. Complete lines 3a through 3c if conditions were placed on a contribution listed in Part I; also attach the required statement (see instructions). a Errter the letter from Part I that identifies the property for which you gave less than an entire interest ► If Part II applies to more than one property, attach a separate statement. to Total amount claimed as a deduction for the property listed in Part I: (1) For this tax year ► (2) For any prior tax years No c Name and address of each organization to which any such contribution was made in a prior year (complete only if different from the donee organization above): Name of charitable orgYiliatlon (donee) Address (number, streK and room or suite no.) d For tangible property, enter the place where the properly is boated or kept ► e Name of any person, other than the donee organization, having actual possession of the properly ► 38 Is there a restriction, either temporary or permanent, on the donee's right to use or dispose of the donated Yes No property? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to Did you give to anyone (other than the donee organization or another organization participating with the donee organization in cooperative fundraising) the right to the income from the donated property or to the possession of the property, including the right to vote donated securities, to acquire the property by purchase or otherwise, or to designate the person having such income, possession, or right to acquire? . . . . . . . . . . . . . e Is there a restriction limiting the donated property for a particular use? For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instiuctiorl8. Cat. No. 62MJ Form 8283 (Rev. 12-2014) 9.1 Owo ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 r� (dl) ose,dthe IN Date.0*.Vd M Ifooracµrted IBI Dorpfs cot Ih) Fairmvketvalue 8 Me" iced to aetenrip coraddRbn try donor lap.. yr.) by donor aadlusted bass (see instructiors) llha lakmatket wbe ® Partial Interests and Restricted Use Property—Complete lines 2a through 2e if you gave less than an entire interest in a property listed in Part I. Complete lines 3a through 3c if conditions were placed on a contribution listed in Part I; also attach the required statement (see instructions). a Errter the letter from Part I that identifies the property for which you gave less than an entire interest ► If Part II applies to more than one property, attach a separate statement. to Total amount claimed as a deduction for the property listed in Part I: (1) For this tax year ► (2) For any prior tax years No c Name and address of each organization to which any such contribution was made in a prior year (complete only if different from the donee organization above): Name of charitable orgYiliatlon (donee) Address (number, streK and room or suite no.) d For tangible property, enter the place where the properly is boated or kept ► e Name of any person, other than the donee organization, having actual possession of the properly ► 38 Is there a restriction, either temporary or permanent, on the donee's right to use or dispose of the donated Yes No property? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to Did you give to anyone (other than the donee organization or another organization participating with the donee organization in cooperative fundraising) the right to the income from the donated property or to the possession of the property, including the right to vote donated securities, to acquire the property by purchase or otherwise, or to designate the person having such income, possession, or right to acquire? . . . . . . . . . . . . . e Is there a restriction limiting the donated property for a particular use? For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instiuctiorl8. Cat. No. 62MJ Form 8283 (Rev. 12-2014) 9.1 12-2014) Section B. Donated Property Over $5,000 (Except Publicly Traded securities)—Complete this section for one item (or one group of similar items) for which you claimed a deduction of morn than $5,000 per item or group (except contributions of publicly traded securities reported in Section A). Provide a separate form for each property donated unless it is part of a group of similar items. M appraisal is generally required for property listed in Section B See instructions. ■ Ihwu 4 Check the box that describes the type of Property donated: a ❑ Art- iwrr-drtion of $20.000 or more) d ❑ NY (contribution of less than $20,000) 9 ❑ collectibles— i ❑ other b ❑ Oual fled Conservation Contribution a 19 Other Real Estate h ❑ Intellectual Property C ❑ EquiPrnara f ❑ Securities i ❑ Vehicles -Ant vol"da's Paintings,sculPtures, watercdore Mels, dawrger s, camics, antiques. decorative arts. textiles, carpets, sive'r We manuscdPts, haorttig iorical nnernaa, and saw simian ob,e , "Co6xtiblM induda MM, stai books. gams, jew icy, sports rterterebitia doll, at. but not art as defined above NOW in certain cases, You must attach a qualified appraisal of the property. Bee irxtnnictions. 5 W 0ascnptim of donated!Property fol you deed W If tangible property vies daeted, give a bi summary d the overall W Appraised far A m ore apace. atteeh a separate afaterre,t) I>tysled ewditlon of to property at the fine of the gull mate[ valva B C D y Ods aogtirY. (y How aoq*ed by doer N 0orrors costa (g( For bargain sales. aster ase trstrrceaha iiigE Dy dornor(rnno, f+d aclLL,Oevs enrount receivetl N as pDewdoorrrLutlm A __ __ Tom.—__.__.._..— ..... ........y a value of 00 or less. See instructions. I declare that the following ilem(s) included in Part I above has to the bast of my krhowledge antl belief an appraisetl value of rpt more than $500 (per item). Enter identifying letter from Part I and describe the specific item. See instructions. ► named Ithat 1 am trot tie the e donee, a parry the e tra saction in which the donor acquired the property. anglofed by. or rewted to any of the fo,agonV pe aorw. or any person who is Missed to any M the foragomg Mesons. AM, t raguwdY used by the corer. doses, or pall b the transactor, I paMned the maxinty, M my, Appraisal's during ny tax year for oder basals. I dedare that i Pafam "I Vai"as on a regular leas; all that bsraias of Mqual'drarrns as desuibed in tiw appraisal. ) am qudifiedc make aPpnsals N the type of property bsg l car "y this to al"Watssl via were rot basal m ra a Pernhage d the appraised propq' wviku FatMmera. I laldernarrd false o, a faor fradula4 oherstatwneri of the vane as d 501 h be subject t appenalt u this Form 6213 they a kr a, me to the ly ,o under aetra, 6701Wa) 1•, , a a aborting the uMerSahment of tax liabr w atltlilion, lI uderawrd grid I may b subject b a penalty wrier sedian fiagSA tl I laiow, a rea9onagy shall ynow. tlrt rM aPPafsal is io ba used'n wmection aim a realm a claim kr rehrd ad a Cabbrtli agree Mallon nYsffitarrat recalls ban my app u®el. dr mat I �are'lot been paned hpn p,asart'ri9 etdence a tmtimmy pry tw gfica of Professrorral Resporoi0liy. n� This charitable organization acknowledges that n is a qualified organization under section 170(c) and that it received the donated Property as described in Section B, Part I, above on the following date ► Funttrertnore, this organization affirms that in the event it sells, exchanges, or otherwise disposes of the Property described in Section B, Part 1 (or any Portion thereol) within 3 years after the date of receipt, 4 will file Forth 828'{ Donee IMomhation Return, with the IRS and give the donor a copy of that form. This ackrawledgmern does not represent agreement with the claimed fair market value. this Properly for an unrelated use? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ► ~� I rmC � A Kr Data/— 2- ZU Form B2B3 (Rev. 12-2014) That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Southwest Quarter, also being corner B9, Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-43; thence on an assumed bearing of South 88 degrees 36 minutes 18 seconds East, along the North line of said Southwest Quarter, a distance of 66.03 feet to comer B10, said Plat, also being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 00 degrees 26 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 263.90 feet to comer Bl 1, said Plat; thence South 80 degrees 01 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 353.78 feet to corner B12, said Plat; thence North 68 degrees 45 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 230.69 feet to comer B1 3, said Plat; thence North 38 degrees 08 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 284.29 feet to said North line; thence North 88 degrees 36 minutes 18 seconds West, along said North line, a distance of 741.29 feet to the point of beginning, Carver County, Minnesota- Elmo innesota Elmo That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 09 minutes 11 seconds West, along the South line of said Southwest Quarter, a distance of 480.51 feet to comer B2042, Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-43; thence North 51 degrees 30 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 141.36 feet to comer B-41, said Plat; thence Northeasterly a distance of 275.09 feet along a tangential curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 400.00 feet and a central angle of 39 degrees 24 minutes 11 seconds to comer B-40, said Plat; thence North 72 degrees 19 minutes 49 seconds East, not tangent to said curve, a distance of 40.07 feet to corner B39, said Plat; thence Easterly a distance of 192.03 feet along a tangential curve concave to the South having a radius of 723.50 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 12 minutes 26 seconds to the East line of said Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 08 minutes 59 seconds East, not tangent to the last described curve, and along said East line, a distance of 369.90 feet to the point of beginning, Carver County, Minnesota. (abstract) 201565v1 13-13 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 the kiddie parade and the street dance. We had a safety tent there. Had our trucks in the parade and so forth so, and then also supported the Lake Minnewashta fireworks too for later on that evening. We're looking forward to assisting the city with the National Night Out on August 6"' which is a big event for us all and I know we have a lot of neighborhoods on tap and Beth does a wonderfid job getting us engaged with that, as I know a lot of you do too. We're also going to be involved with the Miracles for Mitch Triathlon on August 17'h and a new event called the Tonka Mud Run which is being sponsored by a non- profit that supports Children for Hunger worldwide and it's a group that's based in the, kind of the lake region and they have secured the Lake Minnewashta Park to run this mud run and these mud runs are these popular events that you see all around the country and so they're using that sort of theme to try to raise some fimds for their fundraiser and they've asked for our support and so we're going to help them on the 20 of August. So take any questions. Mayor Furlong: Great. Questions for Chief Wolff. Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: I just wanted to say that I appreciate the work you do and everything and we've made comment before about those feedback cards and I really appreciate you continuing to put those in because it does show the level of service and everything that we've giving to the community. And yeah, the fact that you could contain the fire to the garage, whether it was luck or just you know your expertise, we'll go with that but I think that the community owes you a great deal of thanks and really appreciate the work you're doing so thank you. Keep it up. Chief John Wolff. Thank you. We'll take a little bit of luck when we get it. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other comments? Very good, thank you. Chief John Wolff Thank you. JEURISSEN FIRST ADDITION/CAMDEN RIDGE, 1500 PIONEER TRAIL: A. JEURISSEN FIRST ADDITION. APPLICANT/OWNER: BRUCE JEURISSEN: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL AND APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT. B. CAMDEN RIDGE, APPLICANT: LENNAR/OWNER: BRUCE JEURISSEN: 1) REOUEST FOR REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL ESTATE (A2) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-RESIDENTL4,L (PUD -R): PRELIMINARY PLAT OF APPROXIMATELY 36.2 ACRES INTO 32 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, 26 TWINHOME LOTS, AND 7 OUTLOTS: AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT. 2) CONSIDER APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR GRADING PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. Mayor Furlong: We have a number of items here but let's start with a staff report please, and Ms. Aanenson maybe you can kind of explain through the different items that will be before the council this evening. Kate Aanenson: Thank you Mayor, members of the City Council. While this is one property there is a couple different motions and through this presentation tonight you'll see how they're all inner related but SCANNED Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 if it's okay with you I think it'd be nicejust to put it in one motion. They're all intertwined. Inner dependent on each other. So with that this application, it's for a 36 acre parcel located in what we call the 2005 MUSA area located on 1500 Pioneer Trail. The request is for a rezoning from agricultural to a PUD -R and a subdivision review with a conditional use permit. The subject site is zoned agricultural and it is guided for medium density which means it has to have the minimum of 4 units an acre. Medium density goes from 4 to 8 units an acre and this project is right at the 4 units. 4.03 units an acre. The existing conditions on this property. The site currently gains access via Pioneer Trail, hence the address through this access. There we go again. Thanks. Let me just go back here for a second. Okay, subject site. 36 acres. And A2 and the medium density. So this is the existing conditions. Again the 36 acres. The 1500 Pioneer Trail address is based on this current driveway access coming up. Going underneath the 212 bridge and currently accesses the farm property this way and there's a narrow, also another driveway that services the property that's being farmed in this area. So the creek separates the two so topographically they're different in how we saw them and through the Comprehensive Plan which I'll address in a little bit more detail. There are a lot of moving parts on this property and it tends to be more complex in how it's developed so there was this area did have an alterative urban review on it and assessments were made on that and I'll go through that in a little bit more detail. Access to the property. The Bluff Creek corridor. The PUD requirements. The shoreland district requirements and then some other issues that we want to address on that Outlot C which is why there's a separate development contract. I think the biggest difference on this project, which we haven't done too much in the city where you have an underlying property owner that's selling a portion of the property for development. Holding the rest in reserve and then dedicating a part of that to meet the requirements for that project, for the subdivision to go forward and then preserving a part of that to be determined in the future and I'll go into more detail on that. So the alternative urban areawide assessment review for the 2005 area did one thing. We had one project that came in, Liberty on Bluff Creek where we, that triggered the environmental assessment. Instead of looking at that one piece in a vacuum, we studied that whole 600-700 acres and decide what was the best way for that to get serviced. Not only through road access but also provide sewer and water throughout this entire area so Liberty on Bluff Creek was the first project to go through. Then we did get some entitlements on this property that we're looking at today and that plat went away. The Creekside plat which you have a copy, a picture in your staff report. That project also had close to 140 units on it. Then we look at Pioneer Pass. That one is underway. There's very few lots left in that subdivision and then finally the Preserve which you did just approve now. The 5'h Addition on that plat so those developments are moving along and selling out. The existing conditions, again let me just go back a second for the assessments. Want to mention a couple things on the assessments and that's in detail in your staff report and that was, there was an assessment for the AUAR that was attributed to each property so when those properties come in they'll pay for that. Their portion based on the acreage. Then there's also assessments in detail regarding the sewer and water that would provide sewer and water, was put in place that gives this property the ability to develop by putting that in. In addition the road, Bluff Creek Drive is the access point, the main collector for these properties. So the assessments then would be for, as they're itemized in the staff report, for the MUSA expansion, Trunk 101, the Bluff Creek improvements and then there's a total assessment for the property based on the previous entitlement that was given for this property, and I know you've had some discussions and there's some correspondence in Your packet regarding that specific issue. So again the existing conditions on the site, when we looked at the alterative areawide review and we looked at the, how this property would be developed. It wasn't ever contemplated that something on that lower bluff would be developed because of the steep slopes that are identified here. The creek and the like so if we go back to this area here you can see how the Bluff Creek goes through the entire length here. We've got the city trail that goes down. It will continue down through that area but that was an area, because of the low lands and the flood plain down in the area closer to 212 it was not contemplated that that would be developed. So the subdivision that's moving forward is actually on this top piece up in this area here, and then we have the separate outlot which I'll go through in a little bit more detail. So this project when we looked at it, it came in, again to meet the 4 units an acre they had, the applicant had looked at doing an RLM. Similar to what they had done over at Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Reflections but that subdivision required numerous variances and the staff was uncomfortable giving that many variances on that type of a project so we worked hard, and with their good engineering they put together the PUD but the PUD also, same with the low density, there's an expectation that with that you're providing some additional preservation of open space. Because the developer wanted to use everything on the northern half of the creek, the preservation then, and to meet the shoreland regulations, had to move to the south of the creek. So the development standards, intent, lot coverage are all set forward in the PUD ordinance which is attached as a part of the staff report so we felt this was the best tool to move forward. Again to meet not only the 4 units an acre but to provide the flexibility on those lots. The applicant too has provided house sizes that we know can meet those lots on all those so if you look at the twinhomes that are also on this project, it'd be similar to what they've done in Vasserman Ridge where they have twinhomes and single family homes, same developer so we have a history of how they've worked with that in the city. So the other issue then would be the shoreland district because Bluff Creek segments the two pieces of property so there's a shoreland district line. There's a hard cover requirement. Shoreland district calculations and then the total shoreland area has to be provided for. So there's a lot of engineering and a lot of calculations on this project. So then within the PUD this would be the property that's being developed so that plat shown on the northern part here would be the plat itself. This Outlot B is required for dedication in order to one, accomplish the PUD ordinance and also to accomplish the shoreland regulation requirements of that 50% open space so this is a required extraction for preservation. We've shown the shoreland protection ordinance on line on that so that's a requirement for the lot sizes that have to go within that area. So Outlot C wants to be held by the underlying developer. Excuse me, underlying property owner to be determined in the future. So as we stated in the staff report, preservation of that, there is a farm road that gets to that property now. We have put together in our ordinance what we believe is the right language for that access to get to that Outlot C and saying that we want to see how that would be determined in the future. Again the original AUAR did not contemplate this area being developed so we're saying if it can be developed, you need to go back and amend the AUAR and show us how we can get sewer and water and a road to that area. So this would be the Jeurissen 1' Addition so this plat needs to happen, and again these need to happen simultaneously so the development for Camden Ridge would be on Outlot A. Outlot B would then be the preservation area needed for again the shoreland regs and the open space for the PUD and Outlot C would be still maintained by the underlying property owner. So this would be the subdivision for Camden Ridge. So this would actually be the plat. The developer also wants to proceed with grading so we've also included in here another piece, just to keep it as simple as we can, another piece to keep the developer moving and that would be a development contract to allow for grading but that development contract is also tied to another project and that would be the property to the north to get access to this site, and that's this piece right here. With the 5d Addition this access is being platted. That gives them the ability to get down to the property that they need to to grade so that also has to be executed because we cannot give them grading permission until they have, so there's actually dedicated right-of-way to get to that property. On the subdivision itself there's a 70 foot change in grade between the northern end and the southern end and there's some pretty substantial retaining walls in the area. The one retaining wall on the north is up to 9 feet in height in one area and it runs the length of 420 feet and that's this area right here. And then the one in the middle. Mayor Furlong: I'm sorry. Kate Aanenson: I'm sorry. Mayor Furlong: Which area? Kate Aanenson: Right here. Sorry, moved too quickly there. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. iJ Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Kate Aanenson: About 420 feet up to 9 feet in height. This would be just south of the Fox parcel where there's a significant tree stand to the north so they actually moved that street down, preserving those grades and then putting that retaining wall so again doing a lot of engineering. Looking at the best way for the road configuration. Best layout for the lots. A lot of different designs and this seems to be the best location for the roads and the configuration of the plat. The next retaining wall is in the middle of the site here between the backs of these lots and that's about up to about 3 feet in height and that's about 287 feet long. So it goes back about 3 or 4 homes. And then there is another retaining wall around the stormwater pond and that's about 122 feet along the side here and that will also be fenced. We're along 212 here so we're anticipating providing additional buffer for noise attenuation along that side of the road and then the other part of the grading, because this is, the conditional use requires if you're grading within the Bluff Creek area, that does require a conditional use so we want to control that. It appears that some of the trail might be encroaching on some of that grading would be so that mitigate that but the other recommendation we had on try and reduce that one recommendation would be change some of the, whether it's a walkout, lookout type home or providing some additional small walls. Again the condition we have on those retaining walls is those belong to the homeowners association to maintain and not the City so that would be a condition of that and that would be in the development contract. As I indicated the conditional use is to cover those grading within the corridor on that map I just showed you and that kind of follows, this is the primary corridor here. Again some of the city's trail might contemplate edging into that grading itself so that trail that we've got in place that goes up to, terminates right now as you go underneath Bluff Creek would then come down. We've got a city stormwater pond with a connection of the plat here on the Degler, the Preserve 5's then this trail would then continue on down until such time that we connected to that property going to the south. Sewer and water, again would be coming off of Bluff Creek Drive. As I indicated that's part of the assessments that's being paid for the, with this project to cover those. I did want to comment on a stormwater fee on that. There's a note that was brought to our attention here at the end of the day. I'm on surface water management fees in your staff report and it talks about treating the 16.05 and then there's an assessable number of 17.05. I think it should maintain the 16.05. The City Engineer's looked at that so the calculations would change on that so the final fees for the stormwater at final plat would be $104,930.25 so that would be a change in the conditions of approval and into the development contract on that. Todd Gerhardt: Which page Kate? Kate Aanenson: I'm on page 16. The bottom of 16. Did you want anything else on that Paul? Mayor Furlong: I'm sorry, the acreage is changing from 17.05 to? Kate Aanenson: Well if you look at the top of page 17 it says 16.05 in the beginning of this document on page 16 it says 16.05. There's just one place where they use the math, that's calculated at the 17.05 for the acreages so I think that was. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Did you have anything else to add on that Paul? Tree preservation. The areas that are in the darker color are those areas to be removed and try obviously saving everything along the creek corridor and then that as you move towards the property to the north, again trying to save those trees up in that area. So again a landscaping plan that meets city ordinance. Again trying to continue. This is MnDOT property along this area here. There's a stormwater pond and a wetland up in here. Again try and provide significant vegetation here where we can provide the buffer. I know that was some of the challenge for the developer and their engineer to try to, on those lot configurations. They're narrow but they're deeper, again to provide for that noise attenuation. A better buffer. Parks and recreation. This 10 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 neighborhood would then use the new Pioneer Pass park in this area here so the parks recommendation then would be just take park and trail fees based on that number of units and that would be no additional park with that. They would use the existing neighborhood park. So with that we are recommending the final plat for Jeurissen 1 a Addition and a development contract, the rezoning of the subdivision, and conditional use permit for Camden Ridge and then development subject to the conditions of approval of the staff report. In addition I would also recommend that you approve the A, B. A and B, 1 and 2 with the only modification then would be the stormwater fees. And I'd be happy to answer any questions that you have. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for staff at this time? Councilman Laufenburger: I have Mr. Mayor. Mayor Furlong: Yes, Councilman Laufenburger. Councilman Laufenburger: Kate can you go back to an overlay that shows Outlots B and C kind of in a raw? Kate Aanenson: Can you see that? Councilman Laufenburger: Yeah that's good. Okay. Outlot B, right there. Just a little bit south of where your arrow is. There, that area. Is that part of what you described as flood plain? Kate Aanenson: As you get down towards the bottom part it's called Zone A. I think it might be helpful if we look at this, the topography here. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay, that's fine. Kate Aanenson: So it's just kind of more illustrative to kind of understand. So if you look at where the development's occurring up in this top part here. Councilman Laufenburger: Right, and that would be north of the creek correct? Kate Aanenson: Correct. The creek runs right through here. Councilman Laufenburger: Yeah. Kate Aanenson: So then you've got the shoreland and then this area on the south side where the trees are, in this area here, would be Outlot B and then the current farming operation would continue then on this portion here. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: With a continued access through the, through some of that preservation area so one of our conditions then was to define how that access is being used because again that Outlot B needs to be dedicated. Councilman Laufenburger: When you say dedicated, it needs to be specifically dedicated as shoreland. Kate Aanenson: Preservation. 11 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Councilman Laufenburger: Does it become city. Preservation, right. Not conservation but preservation. Kate Aanenson: Preservation, right. For the PUD. Councilman Laufenburger: So where you have, where you have the little finger right now, that land is not being worked by the property owner, correct? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger: And so the determination has been made that that area specifically straight south of the word creek, as I'm looking at it. Right, straight south. That would be part of Outlot B but not Outlot C? Kate Aanenson: Correct. I'm not sure this, I've got this exactly where they're showing all of Outlot C. If that's exact definition there. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay. It just seemed to me that there was a large portion of land south of the creek that you were including as Outlot B versus Outlot C. Kate Aanenson: No. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. Right there. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I've got the acreage in the staff report here. Mayor Furlong: What page is that on for the? Kate Aanenson: Oh I've got to go back to that drawing, thank you. Councilman Laufenburger: This portion right here seems like, why is this portion part of that creek area? There. Yeah, I'm thinking of specifically you're taking a large, Kate you know the topography. You folks have done this. Kate Aanenson: Yes. Councilman Laufenburger. So if, it just looks like that little trapezoid or whatever, parallelogram that's part of Outlot B could just as well be part of Outlot C. Kate Aanenson: It could be. It could be. Well again if you look at what we contemplated in the, when we did the original environmental documents for this, we didn't contemplate any development below the creek. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay. Kate Aanenson: And actually the other uses for this could be, it could be for an enhanced wetland, which the other project contemplated. Providing better water quantity and quality and enhancing that. The natural features in that area. I think the developer was reluctant to dedicate that entire amount but we felt it could be I think in, and so we said that we would at this time hold any opinion on that until they would go through the demonstrate that it could be buildable. That you could get access to it. If you look at the area to the, let me go to the map here again. If you look at this overall area, there is significant grades 12 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 coming in this way. And then from the south. Significant grades. There is a development, or anticipated development potentially a cul-de-sac coming in here. Councilman Laufenburger: In there? Okay. Kate Aanenson: But whether that can make it all the way up here, we don't know. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay. Kate Aanenson: Again whether or not that still can meet sewer and water availability, we still don't know. So that would have to be an amendment, a decision to be made later. Meanwhile we have a developer that would like to proceed so we're saying well, we're not, we never anticipated that. We don't believe it can he but if the developer wants to demonstrate it can be we'll listen to that but we don't know. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. So just for my simple mind, Jeurissen I' Addition is the development of Outlot A? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger. Thank you. Kate Aanenson: Well no, it's actually three lots. So Jeurissen creates outlot, Jeurissen Addition creates 3 lots. Councilman Laufenburger: Only one of which is scheduled for development at this time. Kate Aanenson: Correct but Outlot B must be dedicated too. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay, so it's not going to be developed. It must be dedicated at this time. Kate Aanenson: Correct. That's how they're all intertwined, correct. Mayor Furlong: And I guess going back to that with regard to Outlot B, I think that slide right there says there's a requirement as part of the PUD. Is that part of the PUD ordinance that requires the? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Shoreland and the PUD ordinance requires that preservation. In order to get the PUD you have to give us, you know the first item is you're preserving something. You're doing something different otherwise this would be a standard subdivision. What you're preserving is the other side of the creek, which probably isn't buildable anyways but you're preserving something. Mayor Furlong: And so with Outlot B, that's not 50% of A so. Kate Aanenson: No. Mayor Furlong: So when you talk about open space, what is it, where do you get 50% open space from there? Is that from area calculations? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. It actually includes all the other outlots up here too, which would include this outlot here. Mayor Furlong: Okay. 13 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Kate Aanenson: And the stormwater ponds, it includes all these little outlot pieces. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright, and so the size of B gets the entire development up to that 50%. Kate Aanenson: Just makes us to the 50%. Councilman Laufenburger: Yeah, okay. That explains it. Thanks Kate. Kate Aanenson: I'm sorry, I didn't understand your question. Mayor Furlong: Other questions for staff at this time? Councilwoman Tjomhom Councilwoman Tjornhom: In the staff report I know there was some discrepancy about borders and exactly figuring out where the Bluff Creek Overlay started and ended and I think the last council meeting or two council meetings we had that same discrepancy so can you kind of go through who and how these lines get determined? Kate Aanenson: Sure. On the last one, the staff did not make the applicant do a delineation of that which is, because we thought by taking the other we had accomplished that. In this circumstance we actually had them provide that, delineate that. Typically we walk those so it's kind of prima fascia evidence. You go out there and you look and see you know where the water, actually the wetland boundary is. Are there significant slopes. Anything over 30% you can't build on so you try to finalized or fine tune that line. What we say on our official document is that we believe this is the starting place for the overlay district but certainly there's other evidence that can say that you know it's been modified or altered or it's, we can move that so. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Can you tell me, does it matter what time of year you're looking? Kate Aanenson: Well I'll let the City Engineer but you know as far as the slopes and the trees it's not going to matter. You know the hydrology issue but I think the engineers know how to calculate for that. Paul Oehme: Typically when we're delineating wetlands it's during the summer months and there's a set point in the fall where you typically cannot get a good calculation or good determination of wetland location so there is a time of the year where it's most appropriate for determining those wetlands and then the setbacks and the delineations. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And so does staff only determine those boundaries when a development is in front of you or do you just kind of already have a map of that whole district? Paul Oehme: Well we've got a general idea of where the wetlands are through our Carver County but to delineate specifically wetlands, we always work with the developer to determine those delineations specifically. Kate Aanenson: Otherwise there's other areas that are not wetlands, so I be clear on that, are also in the Overlay District. Sometimes it can be a steep slope. Heavily wooded area so that's something that we would work then to negotiate with the property owner to say well, you're getting more hard cover but in fact if you preserve these trees you can use that as your green space. So that would go towards your, if you're doing a PUD or something, towards your required hard cover so that's a project by project. If you go back when we originally put this in place, we looked at trying to you know try to purchase all that. We decided we'd do it incrementally as we look at each project to say what makes sense under each project. 14 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Is it something we would alter? Something that we maybe not feel as strongly about when it comes in but we look at those on a case by case basis so that's why we didn't do them all at once. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilwoman Ernst. Councilwoman Ernst: Yeah Kate, can you tell me how the percentage rate was derived at? I mean how. Kate Aanenson: Percentage rate? For the assessments? Councilwoman Ernst: Yes. Kate Aanenson: I'll let the City Engineer. Councilwoman Ernst: The 6%. Mayor Furlong: The interest rate? Councilwoman Ernst: Yeah. Paul Oehme: The interest rate? Councilwoman Ernst: Sorry. Sorry, I meant the interest rate, right Paul Oehme: That was determined boy back in 2005-2006 when that project went through. Staff and the finance department and our bonding agencies looked at what was the appropriate assessment amount and the payback times and the 6% was the number that was determined. I can't remember the specifics of both but with the interest rates, back in the prime rate was back in that time but that's the number that was originally, or was set on for the interest rate for the assessments. Councilwoman Ernst: So for the piece of the property that has no access to it, we're charging 6% interest for that property, is that correct? Paul Oehme: It was an area calculation for the assessments. There was actually 3 assessments for this parcel. For this area to development back in 2005-2006-2007 so we had to look at it on a systematic methodology where we looked at how much potential developable square acreage is under these, or is in each of the parcels that were being looked at for development. We looked at how much preliminary amount of wetland that we could determine were on each of these parcels. We took that out of the assessment calculations and then we looked at right-of-way as well for primarily the Bluff Creek Boulevard right-of-way so if there's a parcel that was looked at for development that was being assessed, we took out the right-of-way for that piece so that's generally how the assessments were looked at. You know this parcel originally was looked at for more higher density and there was you know talk about density transfers to make those assessments work so in the area calculation so that was the methodology that we used. Again we try to standardize our methodology and our assessment practice for each of these parcels and that's how assessments were originally calculated. Councilwoman Ernst: But is that common practice we would charge an interest rate such as this on property that really has no access? Paul Oehme: Well I mean. Councilwoman Ernst: For a parcel like this 15 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Paul Oehme: You know we've charged 6%, 7% in the past for assessments for developments too so the interest rate back in 2005 I think was appropriate. Mayor Furlong: Mr. Oehme, just for clarification. The 6% interest is an annual interest rate on the assessment that's, the unpaid assessment, correct? Paul Oehme: Correct. Mayor Furlong: So it's basically an interest charge on the assessed amount that's unpaid. Paul Oehme: Correct. Correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilwoman Ernst: And that's the 600 and some thousand dollars. Mayor Furlong: That's would be the assessed amount perhaps with accrued interest Paul Oehme: Exactly. That's what. Mayor Furlong: So that's the interest, Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Yeah I think the question is, and it's no so much the interest rate but why was that property even assessed if it's not buildable? Paul Oehme: Well I think it goes back to, again to what the AUAR had talked about the MUSA and what our original guidance of that property was. Kate Aanenson: This is what the project was assessed. This is what the assessment went onto this project so there was entitlement on that project. It did receive preliminary plat approval so this is the project, 146 units. There was a viable project that was in place and that project didn't come to fruition but that project was. Councilman McDonald: But at that point that's not Outlot C Kate Aanenson: They did the density transfer so they took what they could and put it up here. Could they have maximized even more? Yes but they didn't at that time so. Again this project is coming under less than that. They've chosen to go with the 4, the minimum 4 units for the project that they want to do so that could affect it too depending on the number of units you have so. Councilman McDonald: So actually the project changed from 2006 to today but our practice is to assess when you bring the project in. Paul Oehme: Right. We had to recoup our costs for the infrastructure put in to service and develop these parcels. Mayor Furlong: What's being described as Outlot C today, was there any expectation of development occurring on that back when the AUAR was completed? I thought I heard you say that there... 16 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Kate Aanenson: No, it was always intended that if there's something that could be built on there because there was limited access, that it'd be transferred up to the north side. Mayor Furlong: Okay, so there would be no expectation of development on Outlot C. Kate Aanenson: Correct. That was always the intention on the environmental. Mayor Furlong: And that's what was included in the AUAR. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: When that was developed. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council if I could add on the interest rates back in 2006 prime was anywhere from 7 1/2 to 8 percent. So our practice is typically 2 percent above prime now so back then my guess it was 2% above what we may have issued bonds for. Mayor Furlong: Other questions for staff at this point? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Just one more. Mayor Furlong: No, that's fine. Councilwoman Tjomhom: We're you know going to be doing a PUD on this property and usually that means that we get a little something more than we normally would so tell me how we are benefitting, if that's a fair question. Kate Aanenson: It's a very good question. Which is why we thought preserving that southern piece, that would have for us. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Outlot C. Kate Aanenson: Outlot C. Councilwoman Tjomhom: And B. Kate Aanenson: And B, right. That was our original direction. The developer, working with the underlying property owner didn't want to do that. I think we don't know again if Outlot C can get access to it. Can get sewer and water to it so we've just taken the position that maybe at a future date it, it just continues to be farmed or becomes a wetland or something else, or the underlying property owner can demonstrate that he can get access to it and can get sewer and water to it, then maybe it could be developed. But you're at the minimum for the requirements for the 50%. It's at the minimum. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. Mayor Furlong: Councilwoman Ernst. Councilwoman Ernst: Sorry. Kate one more question. So can you tell me if there is anything that we, the City could have done in this situation to have avoided being in this type of a situation? Kate Aanenson: Well. 17 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Councilwoman Ernst: I know it's kind of a loaded question. Kate Aanenson: Well the developer chose, the person that had the property chose not to go through forward and sometimes that happens. While you could have come in with a different project on this site too. Somebody could have come in with townbouses or higher density and then this you know, a lot of different scenarios could have happened. We don't control that part of the market and that happened with the tum down so. Councilwoman Ernst: And I'm thinking of that little parcel. Kate Aanenson: Oh. Mayor Furlong: Which one? C or? Kate Aanenson: The access. Councilwoman Ernst: Yeah. Mayor Furlong: This? Councilwoman Ernst: Right. Mayor Furlong: Yeah I guess I had a question on that too. Is that that, is that what's being referred to in, the primary access is from that road right there that you're drawing now. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: But the staff report talks about this development, the road's being longer than what's allowed under current ordinance. And I guess my question is, when the first development came through, the Creekside, we had a second access there. A full street access up to the property to the north. Kate Aanenson: I don't believe so. That was a lot of discussion. If you remember we had quite a few discussions with the property owner to the north regarding that. Mayor Furlong: Absolutely but I think, if you go back. Kate Aanenson: To that drawing? Mayor Furlong: To that drawing. There. There was a lot of discussion but I think in the end, this was approved with this access. Kate Aanenson: I just want to be clear that this is just illustrative. I'm not sure this is the plat. Mayor Furlong: Understand. Kate Aanenson: And if we can go back really quickly, just to make sure that we're all on the same page on this. If we go back to this map here. The complexity here is, you're mixing two different zoning districts. The property to the north, we've looked at it could be regional commercial or an office park. Either one. Different types of uses. That you don't want cut through traffic. But the bigger issue is, this is owned by MnDOT, this triangle piece and then this is a wetland. It's not a stormwater pond so we 18 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 were trying to hug the bottom of this property as we go through that as a 30 foot right-of-way in our mind and then emergency access with you know 7 ton design, 20 foot of pavement width just to get through there because we'd have to work with MnDOT when we're adjacent to that wetland. In looking back through the notes, I did go back and look through what we had for discussion. I know Mr. Fox had discussions with Mr. Chigelo at that time talking about access to, how would this property be served coming from the south or to the north and little more problematic trying to go along some of that MnDOT right-of-way so I think hugging that, which is what we needed for emergency access was what the staff felt would be sufficient as did the fire marshal. And reduce the number of units too. So if you go back to the first one, excuse me, 146. Now we're down to 50 something so. Mayor Furlong: Right but I think, so part of this is we really don't know what's going to happen up to the north. Councilwoman Ernst: Right. Mayor Furlong: And part of my concern is that they, you know the ordinance is in place to minimize, and this goes back to I think that ordinance came in after what was Yoberry at the time that was coming through the development. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Mayor Furlong: And the issues we had there and then the council after that said, you know let's put some limits on that. To me I think right now there's no, there's nothing up north. There's no way to access this development from the north anyway until something develops to the north but I think we should at least preserve the full right-of-way on this and it looks like, if you go back to the site plan for this development. Kate Aanenson: Sure Mayor Furlong: And again we can, just any of those is fine. There seems to be plenty of space with those outlots there with the lot to the east of that to be able to preserve the right-of-way for future access, depending on what it is so what I'm saying is reserve it now to a full public street right-of-way that's typical and then evaluate what's going to happen. Kate Aanenson: Sure. I would just add on that, I'd let the engineer address that but it's terribly steep right through here. That's why they made this lot so big so whether or not we can make that happen, because there's a substantial retaining wall in that area too so I'll let their engineer address that, if that's alright when they come up to speak. Mayor Furlong: Oh, their engineer? Kate Aanenson: Yep. Just to, yeah just I think... Mayor Furlong: And that's fine and I realize it's not... Kate Aanenson: No, because we went back and forth on this issue and I mean I think Mr. Polta examined it pretty closely. I just want to make sure we all understand the complexity of that issue so. Mayor Furlong: And that's fine. We'll defer to that. I just think there's good public value for connecting, keeping the option open in the future to connect neighborhoods. 19 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Kate Aanenson: Agreed. Mayor Furlong: So Mr. Laufenburger. Councilman Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Mayor. Kate can you go back to the Creekside, just for a second? The photo you had there. So do I understand correctly that the, I realize this was never developed but it was, was this the basis for the assessments? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. And the basis for these assessments included the transfer of density from what we are now calling Outlot B and C into current Outlot A, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: I'll let Paul answer that question. Paul Oehme: The density from. Councilman Laufenburger: The density from B and C was transferred up into the top in order to, and then that was, the assessment was based essentially on the entire property. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Paul Oehme: It was minus, I would just clarify, minus the wetlands that were known at that time so basically all of B, most of Outlot B has wetlands associated with it so there's a substantial amount of acreage there that was also deducted from the assessment acreage. So mainly C. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. So if the assessments which we are asking to be paid when this goes to development or goes to. Kate Aanenson: Final plat. Councilman Laufenburger: Final plat, which is what we're going to be voting on tonight, is that correct Kate? Kate Aanenson: You're working on preliminary plat now. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay, but if at some point in the future it's determined that Outlot C can support some development, do we assume correctly that those assessments have already been paid? Paul Oehme: Yes. Correct. That's our recommendation is to have the assessments paid for Outlot A all at this time. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. And that would include, so the benefit, I don't want to say this incorrectly. The benefit would be that if Outlot C ever is developed they would be developed without any further assessments due to the City, is that correct? PaulOehme: Correct. Mayor Furlong: For the assessments that were already, Bluff Creek Drive. Paul Oehme: Right. 20 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Mayor Furlong: The AUAR costs for those. Councilman Laufenburger: If there was other activities or other things outside of what was covered, then those would be assessed. Paul Oehme: Right. The assessments are currently levied against this property owner, or the property would be all paid off. Councilnan Laufenburger: And those levies, those were identified in the staff report as the MUSA, Trunk Highway 101 /Lyman and the Bluff Creek Boulevard. Paul Oehme: Correct, those three. Kate Aanenson: Right because there may be additional trunk charges to hook up somewhere else. Paul Oehme: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay, Councilman McDonald: But maybe if I could, okay you say that he wouldn't owe any but by my calculations he would. You took a density transfer out of Outlot C in order to allow this development to be made. Now we are releasing Outlot C. He still gets his development based upon lower density at this point so the area that it was calculated for is still the same. That hasn't changed. We've just released Outlot C. If it's ever developed in the future as part of anything else, it should be assessed because at that point you're now allowing development to occur on that particular outlot. So I don't see how, granted with this development it was paid for but now you're releasing it so it doesn't make any difference. It was to try to get this development developed. Paul Oehme: Correct. Councilman McDonald: And you needed the density transfer. Now you no longer need the density transfer but you're still assessing the same area with lower density in the development so you don't need Outlot C so we're releasing it so that in the future if you want to develop it you can but if you do then it should be assessed because now you're going to have to bring sewer and water into Outlot C. Am I correct in that or? Todd Gerhardt: Yeah and you know, right now staff has deemed Outlot C as undevelopable and the AUAR that we did in the area called it as undevelopable. We did the calculations for Bluff Creek Drive, or Boulevard based on an acreage basis and subtracted out wetlands and so how you spread those assessments can only go to the parcel that's developable. You put them on Parcel C, you don't know if it's developable so you know down the line if it is, then depending on where sewer and water and access is going to be gained, that will be the cost beared by that development. Councilman McDonald: Right because at this point the only way you're going to develop that, you're going to have to come in from the south. You can't come in from the north. You can't come in from the, well actually it's what, the southwest. You can't come in underneath the bridge on 212 so you're barred from that. You can't come in directly to the west because there's lots already there so you've only got one area of access and that's through another piece of property that they wanted to develop that and include what is now Outlot C, you've still got to get sewer and water up there so there should be an assessment for that because the original calculation was not made to get water and sewer into Outlot C. 21 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 LCFf[e3y7tiTtfi�KSt'�S Mayor Furlong: And I think Mr. McDonald, if the City puts sewer and water in to someplace, we will assess for that. Obviously these assessments were not related to sewer and water type assessments. It was for the planning and the construction of Bluff Creek Boulevard and for the other components but what I heard Mr. Gerhardt say, correct me if I'm wrong, is that it was based upon developable area. Not necessarily the density within that area, right? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Is that correct? So the fact that there was some density transfer from C, or what today is we're calling C up to A would not have affected, it doesn't effect the area because the area is still the same. Councilman McDonald: Right, the area is still the same Mayor Furlong: So what I'm hearing is, what was assessed is effectively based upon the area within Outlot A today, which is what staff is recommending should be the part that gets paid. So there was no. Councilman McDonald: I think we're talking about two different assessments then aren't we? Mayor Furlong: Well the assessment, maybe backing up then. The assessment that was put on the property back a number of years ago, which has been accruing that 6% interest related to what? It was the AUAR cost, Ms. Aanenson. Kate Aanenson: Yes, it's on page 7. So it's the 2005 MUSA expansion. Trunk 101/Lyman Boulevard. Bluff Creek Boulevard improvements, which did include the trunk sewer and water and road because you need that road and that sewer and water to get, to be able to develop this piece. Mayor Furlong: To service Outlot A. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Yeah, correct. So those are the assessments. So then there's a total so those would be the three. Mayor Furlong: And what I'm hearing here is all of those assessments relate to what's currently being proposed to be developed. Is that? Kate Aanenson: That's our opinion, correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And I'm sure we'll hear from the developer as well. Councilman Laufenburger. So Mr. Mayor, just one more question. So on page 7 Kate, specifically it shows that the Bluff Creek Boulevard improvements, that assessment of $601,212.65, if those assessments were made today on Jeurissen I' Outlot A as compared to Liberty at Creekside, which was in 2006, would those assessments be identical today that they were back then? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay there. That answers it for me. 22 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other questions? If not I do want to invite the applicant, or their representatives to come forward and they may have some comments on these and other aspects. Kate Aanenson: There's kind of co -applicants here. You have the underlying property owner, Mr. Jeurissen and then you have Lennar representing their plat so, I don't know how you. Mayor Furlong: Great. I'll defer to the two parties to who wants to speak first because we're interested in what you both have to say. John Chadwick: Thank you very much folks. I'm John Chadwick. I have a little handout here. I'll start that first. My name is John Chadwick. I'm here on behalf of the landowner, Bruce Jeurissen. I reside at 4477 Manitou Road, Excelsior, Minnesota. It's good to be here. I've been here before on behalf of other landowners and you know seeing the fire folks and the police folks up here reminds me what a great country we live in and we have the right of freedom of speech and that's what I'm intending to exercise tonight. The right of dissent. The right of public assembly. All those good things and I also know that we only know what we know. We only know what people tell us. That's the basis here and so with that in mind there are a couple issues that I'd like to take up on behalf of Mr. Jeurissen, who's with us tonight. Thank you Lennar folks for letting me go first. I don't know if that's right or wrong but anyway thank you. The first one, if you read there in item 15 you have an item 15. I think it's probably on page 28 of your handout. Page 28 and it talks about the language on the, how do you get in there to Outlot C and it says that it must be closed. I mean that's the first line and then it says you have to keep using it and so I have offered up some revised language and Kate if you could go back to existing conditions. That one that had kind of the topographic to it and you can kind of see, there's a roadway going in and then there's the driveway that's owned, Outlot D and it comes in like this and there's a park that goes north to Outlot A. Yep, close that. Absolutely makes sense. Going back to the west Outlot, if you're going to Outlot B and C's, well it says to keep that open but I didn't feel that that language was particularly clear as written. I did offer up this language earlier in the day. It didn't I guess meet muster but I'm offering it up again. I learned at 4:51 today that it didn't meet muster so anyway there it is. We're just trying to be real clear. Yep, knock her out for Outlot A. I get that. Yes, we need to keep it open for Outlots B and C and there is a driveway easement. Excuse me, a driveway access permit that Mr. Jeurissen has with MnDOT and that is what allows him to get that equipment in and out and underneath Highway 212 and so together with his Outlot D that he owns. That driveway that comes in off of Pioneer, and this driveway permit that he has, that's what allows him to get into B. There's nothing else to close as regards to B and C. Mayor Furlong: Can we just take maybe these one at a time. John Chadwick: Please. Mayor Furlong: I guess Ms. Aanenson your comments or thoughts on the proposed changes. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Before is there a better map that we can see that, those driveways better? Kate Aanenson: I can blow that up. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Thank you. That helps me a lot. Kate Aanenson: So when you come under 212, the road splits going to the north. That road will be vacated because it's being platted. Everything going to the north. This is the road we want, this is the road we want. This road is going over the southern area that's being preserved. Outlot B and we just want to put limitations on that so it's, since it's a preservation area to meet the intent of the shoreland 23 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 district and the PUD that it's limited for farm practices and a certain width and that's what we put in there. I think based on the plat being approved, I can check with the City Attorney but with the plat being approved, the northern access is going away because you're approving a plat over that so I don't know if it's redundant or if it's necessary but. John Chadwick: Oh that's correct, yes. Mayor Furlong: And I guess I'm concerned why you want to close the access to A just at this time. You have the words at this time which implies to me that at a future time you would open that up under your proposed changes. John Chadwick: Oh, well it just said it must be closed. Before it didn't say when. Kate Aanenson: Well once you record the plat then I'm assuming that the property would then transfer to the Lermar and they would have control over that, and you're on this portion of MnDOT's right-of-way on that so I'm assuming that would go away. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council. Maybe if the existing driveway access to Trunk Highway 212 must be closed with the exception of the, for exception for the use for agricultural purposes only. Mayor Furlong: To Outlot C. Todd Gerhardt: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Since Outlot B's going to be dedicated. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, just put the word exception in there for agricultural purposes. Kate Aanenson: And we did specify with on that too. Mayor Furlong: I'm sorry. Todd Gerhardt: Except for agricultural purposes. Kate Aanenson: Can I get clarification what number you're on, I'm sorry. Todd Gerhardt: 28 of 32, 15. John Chadwick: Item 15. Mayor Furlong: Page 28. Kate Aanenson: Okay, I'm having a hard time following, I'm sorry. Okay. Yeah, so we did specify too the width of that, and I'm not sure if that's covered in this one or not. That's what I was trying to. John Chadwick: Yes I think it is. Mayor Furlong: So I'm sorry, the suggested language Mr. Gerhardt is modifying the staff's proposed condition and that is how? Todd Gerhardt: Put in the words, for the exception of agricultural purposes only. 24 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Mayor Furlong: Where are you putting that in? Todd Gerhardt: Taking out this access may be used for. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Except for agricultural purposes. He needs to go across Outlot B and we've decided 26 feet would be appropriate. Mayor Furlong: Okay, is that, Mr. Chadwick is that acceptable? John Chadwick: 26? Agricultural? We'd be able to get in across... Mayor Furlong: You had 26 in your proposal. John Chadwick: Oh, for what purpose. Yeah the question I guess comes up, it's agricultural. What's permitted under your code now and why would you change that? Access today is now permitted for in the code. Kate Aanenson: Well I guess we were concerned if it would become a grading operation. You could go sorting of materials on there. Something like that so. John Chadwick: And that's permitted. Mayor Furlong: What is that, Outlot C is currently zoned what? Kate Aanenson: Agricultural. Mayor Furlong: Agricultural so I'm assuming with this plat, anything allowed under agricultural would still be allowed and if there are changes there are changes. But that would be to any agricultural zoning in the city. John Chadwick: So would it be fair to say that the zoning is agricultural and whatever purposes are allowed under agricultural would be allowed, or I mean that's what I would think. You enforce the same code on everybody across the whole community as opposed to just singling one guy out and say you can only do. Kate Aanenson: Well let me just clarify that for a second because it is being farmed my concern would be if we operated a mining operation or something, we've got all that traffic going underneath something that maybe wasn't designed. How it's being accessed now is for agricultural purposes. I'm not sure that easement's designed, if it became some other use under the agricultural zoning so I just would like to check on what the zoning district does permit on that just to be clear on that so. Mayor Furlong: So that is something that we can look at. The expectation would be for similar purposes as is currently being used, correct? John Chadwick: I think as permitted under the law. Mayor Furlong: Well and I think that's what, Ms. Aanenson if I'm hearing you correctly 25 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Kate Aanenson: Right. Mayor Furlong: We need to look into that Kate Aanenson: Yeah. There might be some other uses that might be conditional uses that would require certain improvements or the like so, whether or not those could be. Mayor Furlong: Alright. John Chadwick: I guess part of the reason I'm pretty insistent on that is we've got a long standing visit going on with MnDOT and getting somewhere but not very far very fast and so I think it's critical that we keep going with you know what's available under the current law and not give up any rights here if we don't have to get that opportunity to do that. Mayor Furlong: Okay, so that can be investigated between now and final plat, is that correct Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. John Chadwick: Thank you. Great idea take them one at a time. Now, and you folks were just working on kind of a thorny issue on assessments and I appreciate that and this has been a long, a long and interesting path that this land has taken and item 20, discussion same page and there's assessments that you'd say okay, there's about 22 acres of usable north of the creek and there's about 8 acres south of the creek, and that 8 acres came up from a court case that Mr. Jeurissen pressed through the courts here in Minnesota and but yet the notion is, you know what we're just going to kind of collect them all right now. We also, and not giving any credence to the fact that there are 5 acres that he's continuing to retain. And that, and you're kind of saying well you know what, we don't think, or some people don't think that that's usable. Please demonstrate that to us later that it is usable but in the meantime we want the money anyway and when I look at that, you know pay for all of it but determine it later you know up or down, that feels like a little bit of guilty until proven innocent. I think in our country we do it the other way. We're innocent until proven guilty so I would ask that you apportion that. Think about apportioning that. If you can't, if we don't know for sure it's bad we'll call it, we'll use that word, why are you making it bad and taking it out of the equation day one? That's the first thing you know. And the second thing is, it gets a little bit snarly because we're saying that's not accessible to Bluff Creek but yet this is a Bluff Creek $601,000 assessment. You know why did he get charged in the first place? You know is it usable or is it not usable? If it's usable, then great. Let it sit on the south side and pay it later. If it's not usable, why did it get charged in the first place? So there's been some long, drawn out dilemmas on this. And then the next part, the interest on the assessments. This piece of ground, 22 acres, 25 acres, however many you want to say is bearing $847,000 worth of assessments. That's something like $40,000 of assessments on the usable acres and then the interest was deferred on that. But however that land was trapped because that land could never grow a crop in Chanhassen, Minnesota that's legal that could pay off $40,000 an acre so that had to sit there and wait to be paid. It had to wait to be paid until it could be developed because you couldn't sell it for ag land for that price and we knew that as of June 16'", 2013 there wasn't access to this property. This property has only been emancipated this evening on an action earlier on the Jeurissen, excuse me on the Degler 5b Addition that allowed access so it was bound up. It was locked up. It could not have any way to access it. It had no way to pay the freight on that and the City's out collecting 6% interest knowing full well the guy can't pay it. Got him locked up. He can't get there. Only tonight is it now available to him so it say gee, we'd like the $601,000 plus another $195,000 of interest by the way and you know we couldn't use it for public infrastructure. That's what we're Ow Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 paying for but it was a private matter that had to be solved and that's what the June 16"' thing said. So that just, and that, my statement on why does a private developer, private person have to do that. That is on page 17 of 32. June 18 Planning Commission. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, about eighth paragraph down. So, and I've talked it over with Bruce. He says yeah, you know of course give me assessments once I'm able to use it but how can you charge me assessments when I can't use it. I can't get there. I really was locked in. I had no way to pay it so I'd really ask your thoughtful consideration on that matter. And then at the bottom of the page I put in a revision. There was as written. Unless Bluff Creek Boulevard improvements are, an assessment and then you can see mine with red. If you'd consider that as being a way to be reasonably fair to somebody who's been waiting for a long time and didn't have access until this evening. I'm grateful that he has access this evening. I appreciate that. Thank you. And happy to answer any questions. Mayor Furlong: I guess just one question I had just looking at what you handed out tonight. That wasa little bit different than what we had received over the weekend, is that correct? On this issue because, well it looks like it just looking at what we received versus this one. It's a little bit of a different argument than... John Chadwick: Yeah you know it really is because over the weekend I said, gee it's tough to, I had sent out something or I gave it to Bruce and I don't know who all got it but it said ought to make the interest rate fair instead of the bank, the City scalping him because the costs are considerably less for interest than the 6%. He's got no way to get there to pay it and you start thinking about no way to pay it whatsoever with the crop that's there. He's bound in. I mean he's locked in so yes, that is a different way to look at it. Mayor Furlong: Alright. Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Chadwick? Councilman McDonald Councilman McDonald: Yeah we get down to the whole thing about assessments and that's kind of what my questions and everything was about but who approached the city to incur these costs? How did that come about? What do you know what about? John Chadwick: It's my understanding that the City put together the entire project and then they handed out assessments based on acreage and then each landowner was asked to accept those assessments. Councilman McDonald: But someone has to initiate that we're going to do development of land. Who was that? Who triggered the assessments? I mean the City doesn't just go out and assess land unless someone asks them I want to do a development and we have to provide certain infrastructure and those things and so then we go out and do the studies as you heard and that's where the assessments come from. Who started all of this? John Chadwick: I think it actually started on the old Bernardi parcel, which Town And Country's first deal. Liberty, it'd be on the west side of this whole study area. And they needed sewer and water to come in, or more importantly I guess the lift station access on Mr. Degler's property and then it's kind of triggered well we have to do this. Then we have to do that. Then we have to put in the entire Bluff Creek Drive in order to make it happen. Councilman McDonald: At the time was Town and Country looking out for your, Mr. Jeurissen's interest or were they independent and just grabbing up land and saying that well I think we want to do here City. Why don't you look at this. Who was the underlying. What was the back story in all of this because it wasn't the City going out and deciding to do an assessment and assessing your client. Someone came to us and said, we want to do this development. What do you as a city, what do you expect from us? Who were the initial players in all of this? 27 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 John Chadwick: Town and Country had two parcels. They had one on the west. The Bernardi parcel and they had this piece of Mr. Jeurissen's. Councilman McDonald: Okay, so they were acting in Mr. Jeurissen's best interest at that point. John Chadwick: They were acting in their own best interest. Councilman McDonald: Did they have a contract with Mr. Jeurissen on this land? Did they have some claim to the land? John Chadwick: Yes and regardless of whether it was Town and Country owning it or Mr. Jeurissen owning it, there could be no development until this land was emancipated. Councilman McDonald: But that doesn't necessarily stop anyone from wanting to do development. If Town and Country, which also owned the parcels to the west were now looking and at one time they were going to develop most of this southern part of this section down here, they would ask the City to do all that because that was their plans. At that point they had perfect access because they had all the land contracts. John Chadwick: Sir I would disagree. Councilman McDonald: Okay well that's what I'm trying to find out. John Chadwick: The River Rock Drive was not there so they did not have perfect access. They could not get to, back to Bluff Creek Drive any better than I could before your action this evening. Without trespassing. Councilman McDonald: Then why did they come to us? Why did they ask us to perform work that cost the City money and, I don't understand that part of it. John Chadwick: Well, we're into it. Here we go. You approved a project for Mr. Degler in 2006. Part of those conditions were to provide access, River Rock Drive. That access, that easement rather was not collected at that time so, I mean Town and Country was right there wanting to get going and the market changed on them. I get that but there was a plat approved, and I don't think that plat was approved that said guess what Town and Country you are on your own to find your access. It was, it didn't, I don't think it said that. I'm happy to be corrected if it said that but I think it might have been silent on that but the easement was never collected so nothing could happen. Councilman McDonald: But all this was done in anticipation of Town and Country doing a development on this property, is that right? John Chadwick: Absolutely. Councilman McDonald: Okay, so the City did what was asked of them. I guess I'm having a hard time understanding why you think the City should eat the cost of doing this when we were asked to perform and we did perform. John Chadwick: Okay, if we had kept that preliminary plat going. Let's say the one that was Town and Country. Kept it going, kept it going through 2012 and you said okay, I want to build it. And then we'd all be looking at ourselves and say you know what, you don't have access. Can't build it. So sorry. 28 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Todd Gerhardt: Mr. Mayor, council. That's an untrue statement. At any time that the Preserve development would have come in we would have taken that right-of-way with whatever addition but we didn't take it for the first addition because Town and Country didn't ask for it. It wasn't until six months ago when Lennar came in and asked for access so we waited until the Fifth Addition, which is before you tonight is when we're taking the right-of-way and if we took the right-of-way right away in the beginning, we would have never required Mr. Degler to build the road. We would have just taken the right-of-way. John Chadwick: Oh, totally agree but we wouldn't be waiting and waiting and waiting for a closing. The cost of who's building that road is maybe not fully in the public view here but the fact is it could have got going had we had that easement. True or false? Easement was there in 2009. Could we have gone in 2009? Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, if you would have been there and asked for it but nobody was asking for it. John Chadwick: But why would you ask for it when you're approving a plat already in 2006 that says go ahead and go, wouldn't that be kind of an automatic that you? Todd Gerhardt: It wasn't until 6 months ago when Lennar came in and said we need access. John Chadwick: But the guys in 2006 also needed access. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, and we have it in the development contract that we would provide access. Didn't say when but it said we would provide it. John Chadwick: Granted. Todd Gerhardt: Right? John Chadwick: So as soon as you provide it Bruce will pay. Got it. That's all I'm saying. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Anything else? John Chadwick: No I'm good, thanks. Mayor Furlong: Thank you Mr. Chadwick. Representatives from Lennar are here. Good evening. Steve Ach: Good evening Mr. Mayor, council members. My name is Steve Ach with Lennar. I think Kate stated out the evening saying it is a pretty complicated issue. A lot of moving parts here and I think our part is a little more static than everything else so, we've worked through quite a few of the issues with staff and I think coming here this evening I knew the biggest issue would be with the Jeurissen plat and the assessments and some of the history there so, we're pretty comfortable with our application. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Steve Ach: I guess just one clarification I had Kate though with the plat for Jeurissen. The action tonight, is that for a final plat or does it have to come back again? I thought the Outlot plat was a final plat tonight. Mayor Furlong: This says preliminary and final but is that for all? Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Kate Aanenson: It might be for the Jeurissen. Yeah, just for the Jeurissen First Addition for the, there's two plats. Jeurissen First Addition and then the second one is for Camden Ridge is the second plat and that's only preliminary. Steve Ach: Yep. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Can you clarify on a picture which is which? Kate Aanenson: Yep, so this is Outlot A. So that's only getting preliminary. They're just going to get what their desire tonight is to get a grading permit. Mayor Furlong: And that's, Outlot A is Camden Ridge are the same? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Then Outlot B is a requirement for, that has to be recorded with a preservation easement with the preliminary, with the final plat. But if they're doing preliminary and final, I have a question for the City Attorney then on the. Steve Ach: For the Jeurissen First Addition? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Do you too? Steve Ach: Well I don't. I thought it was final plat this evening Kate Aanenson: Okay. Steve Ach: And the only reason I bring it up is I heard conversation earlier about uses in agricultural district but it's going to come back at final. Kate Aanenson: Well, well I have a concern about that too because I just looked up the uses there because they're crossing over what will then be the city property. The preservation easement. I just want to be clear on that, what's permitted in that zoning district. I just need the City Attorney's opinion on this so, because they're crossing over Outlot B on that preservation area. The reason why we put in there agricultural purposes, if you look at what's permitted in the A2 district, and if we have buyers on the north end, if Mr. Jeurissen chose to sell it to somebody. If he chose not to farm it a number of years or to try to develop it, here's what's permitted in the A2 district. Private stables. ArboreturrL Daycare. Group home. Single family dwellings. Of course they can be on septic and well so that would be coming off a private road going through our's so our intention was not to have cross through but again in good faith saying Mr. Jeurissen can continue to farm, we said we will let you continue to farm so if we're going to open it up to anything permitted in that A2 district across the property, again going to say I don't, I'm not sure if that's what we want and I would ask the council for some consideration on that. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: And that's where we tried to narrow that definition. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So we just jumped back to the access but if I can, I want to clarify, for the council and for anybody else that maybe is confused, there's a Jeurissen First Addition and there's a Camden Ridge and most of the night we've been talking about Outlots A, B and C. So can you tell me what is 30 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 included with Jeurissen First? Okay, I just heard a, I want to make sure we have some clarification because when we, if it's preliminary and final, that's different than just preliminary. Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Okay, so Mr. Knutson. Roger Knutson: Jeurissen First Addition is Outlots A, B, C and D. Kate Aanenson: Right, so it does include the farm access road as a requirement with this addition. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And Camden Ridge. Roger Knutson: That is just a preliminary. Not just. Only. Mayor Furlong: Okay but that covers Outlot A only. Roger Knutson: They're going to replat it into Outlot A. Steve Ach: We'll replat Outlot A into those lots. Roger Knutson: Yes, yes. Mayor Furlong: So the first step with the Jeurissen First Addition is to take the entire property and create Outlots A, B, C and D? Roger Knutson: Yes. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: And then Camden Ridge is a site plan Outlot A. Roger Knutson: It's preliminary plat for Outlot A. Mayor Furlong: The preliminary plat for. Roger Knutson: To replat Outlot A into lots and blocks. Kate Aanenson: Right, preliminary and a development contract to allow them to grade. Mayor Furlong: Prior to final. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So again because we are final platting that, that's why the issue of the driveway came up and they certainly want to understand what that means to them as the developer, what could happen on that property to their buyers to the north. Mayor Furlong: Okay, that helps me so hopefully it helps other people. Does that help you? 31 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Steve Ach: Yes it does and I just wanted to make sure that if it is final tonight because the primary purpose for the outlet plat, as Kate started out this evening, it's one large parcel and we're really creating the outlots for conveyance purposes. Lennar is buying Outlet A. Mr. Jeurissen is retaining B, C and D. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Steve Ach: So we're going to come back and replat Outlet A but it kind of affects our closing too so that's why I want to make sure it was final this evening. Mayor Furlong: So you wanted to confirm that the Jeurissen, the creation of the four outlots was the final. Steve Ach: Right. Mayor Furlong: And that is correct before us tonight. Kate Aanenson: Right. Mayor Furlong: And then your's is preliminary. The replatting of A is preliminary. Steve Ach: Absolutely. And again we're fine with the conditions that are set forth in our report. We worked forward and backwards on this for quite a while. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright, thank you. Alright. Before you sit down sir, any questions? Or maybe you can sit if there aren't any questions. Okay. Are you comfortable with what's been discussed here tonight then as far as the. Steve Ach: Yes. Mayor Furlong: The discussion. Okay. And just to clarify, we did, we did talk about preserving the entire width right-of-way on that north connection and I just, I think that's something that we'd like to do so if you have some questions about that. Steve Ach: Yeah, I was just talking with Nick, the engineer. We can probably do it but as Kate pointed out, this doesn't really do any justice to what's out there. There's a lot of steep slopes. Mayor Furlong: Understand. Steve Ach: I think providing the right -0f --way, we can certainly do that. Mayor Furlong: And I think the key is, to put it in an area where, with the slopes you have the best chance of putting in an access road. Steve Ach: I think Kate had a map up there earlier that showed the wetland off to the edge so there's some other things we have to navigate through but it sounds like we can do that. We'll take a closer look at it between now and the final plat. Mayor Furlong: Our challenge as a council has been connecting neighborhoods over time and this gives us the flexibility to look for options in the future. To have those options. 32 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Steve Ach: Certainly Mayor Furlong: Of connections so thank you for that. And that can be, the location of that and everything can be clarified prior to fmal plat. Working with staff. Steve Ach: I think to me that is a condition that we could look at that and just see the actual width and the exact location. Mayor Furlong: Figure out the best spot, okay. Alright. Thank you. Okay let's, there was a public hearing at the Planning Commission for this. I don't know if there are any public comments. Aside from that, Mr. Fox. Jeff Fox: Good evening Mr. Mayor and council members. Mayor Furlong: Good evening. Jeff Fox: Question regarding the wall. The 9 foot wall. Is there a fence planned for the top of that wall? Kate Aanenson: Is there? 9 feet, it has to be doesn't it? Jeff Fox: Yeah, I think Paul said anything over 4 had. And how far is the wall off the lot line? Kate Aanenson: Could I ask Mr. Polta, the engineer for the project to come forward and maybe he could address the more specifics on that and I can go to that slide. Mayor Furlong: Good evening. Nick Polta: Mayor, council members. My name's Nick Polta. I'm with Pioneer Engineering. The wall at it's closest point I believe is 20 feet from your property line. There should be enough room for a geogrid and the construction of the wall. Jeff Fox: The other concern I have is with the, I think it was the previous Town and Country project had the access point going into the right-of-way area. Now it looks like it's going into what's called the tree preservation area so I presume the tree preservation area is going to be altered and there's some steep slope in that area where we're going through this tree preservation area. And who's absorbing the cost of that because originally it was going to be coming to our develop, buildable area. At this present time the tree preservation area as far as I know is not part of the buildable area so who's paying the cost to get it to that area that's usable for us and is it going to be within the tree preservation area and altered for that reason? Mayor Furlong: Well I guess, Ms. Aanenson. Kate Aanenson: Sure. I guess going back to what we talked about before, depending on what those end uses are and how that looks, you know we've walked your property a couple of times looking at the tree line. We kind of agreed that some of the steeper part along the bottom, some of that area might come away. We'd have to look at that but we look at that when your project comes forward. Whatever shape that takes. Jeff Fox: Who's paying for that cost? Because originally it was going, it was not going to be on our property. It was going to be in the right-of-way and there's a cost for us to take care of it from the 33 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 property line to the buildable area. Now it becomes to the Jeurissen, or to the property to the south of us through the tree preservation area. Kate Aanenson: Our typical ordinance is that we provide access to the edge of the property and the other property owner would pick it up on the other side. Jeff Fox: So we'll be responsible for the tree removal? The retaining walls along with the road to build through there. Kate Aanenson: Yeah again our goal is to put that road in such a place that we minimize that and that's I think the challenge that we're looking at tonight. We don't have enough information but we can certainly look at that. Jeff Fox: I just wanted to go on record so. Kate Aancnson: Yeah. And we'll look at that with you. Jeff Fox: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Well and you know I think working together. If there's a preferred. Jeff Fox: Well I didn't know any bit of this was going on. I had no notice of this until I pulled it up online and looked at it myself. I didn't get notified of any of this. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Okay, thank you Mr. Fox. Any other public comments tonight? Let's bring it to council then for discussion. Number of items in front of us but I'll start the discussion by saying it's nice to see another plat in front of us. See development occurring so thoughts and comments. Councilman Laufenburger. Mr. Mayor, I just have a question for Kate. Mayor Furlong: Sure. Councilman Laufenburger. I think I got the answer from you earlier that no assessments were made against Outlot C back in 2006. Kate Aanenson: No, I think what the City Manager said is there was an area wide assessment across all the property, minus the wetlands. Councilman Laufenburger: Is that right? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Outlot C still doesn't exist until you take action tonight. Mayor Furlong: But that area was not considered as part of the area that was included in the assessment calculation? Paul Oehme: Well yeah, minus the wetland. The wetland was removed from the area wide. 34 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Councilman Laufenburger: Okay, let's not talk about Outlot C. The area south of Bluff Creek on the Jeurissen property, was any of that, with exception of the wetland, was any of that considered in the assessments? Were the assessments based on any property south of Bluff Creek? Paul Oehme: South of Bluff Creek, I mean if it wasn't. Councilman Laufenburger. If it wasn't wetland. Paul Oehme: If it wasn't wetland. Councilman Laufenburger: That acreage was considered. Paul Oehme: That would be considered as assessable, correct Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. Then I also heard a comment that if it's determined that Outlot C, after Outlot C is made later tonight, if Outlot C is determined to be buildable, there could be assessments for sewer, water and road, is that correct? Paul Oehme: Under the scenario of building an Oudot C, that would be completely development driven. They would have to provide a place to hook up to city sewer and water. The City would not get involved typically with those type of projects and would not assess back to them. That would have to be development driven so we're just trying to recoup the costs for our infrastructure that was put in back in 2005-2006 and we went with the best information we had at the time. Councilman Laufenburger. And the best information we had at that time was Liberty at Creekside, Town and Country. Paul Oehme: Correct, and that was forthcoming. Todd Gerhardt: And Mayor and council, we've been through enough assessment hearings to know that the time to contest an assessment is prior to the close of the public hearing. Town and Country was the property owner at that time and so that kind of dictated the final chapter of how assessments were going to be allocated against this property. Not to say that Mr. Jeurissen can't ask you to reallocate those at this time, which he's doing this evening. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Other questions or comments. Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Well I guess I have a question and I'm not quite sure how to put it together. I mean you, this land is very troubled. There was an owner that was going to do something so we did what we were supposed to do and the assessments are part of that. Have we had any other properties that change and we've had to do things, you know recalculate assessments or redo things years later because market changed or something? Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, on the Preserve. The Ryland development. We reallocated the assessments on Sever Peterson's piece back to those developable parcels in the area after they came in with their subdivision. They were reallocated. Councilnan McDonald: Okay what, the original allocation fees and everything, what happened to those? Did we give money back? What was the, what did we do? 35 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Todd Gerhardt: No, they were divided amongst the existing property there. The land to the west of Outlot C has a future access. There's some assessments against that down the line so green acted right at this point. Mayor Furlong: Mr. Knutson. Roger Knutson: Mayor, members of the council. Anytime there's an assessment imposed and subsequent to the assessment the property is subdivided, you have to apportion that assessment that was against the big parcel into smaller parcels or one of the parcels or some of the parcels and that's not an uncommon occurrence. What you want to be careful of, and I've seen this happen in some places where cities haven't been careful. If you apportion it wrong against a parcel that's not likely or will not develop, then it's going to go tax forfeit so you want to make sure you apportion it appropriately to take it, with that concern in mind. Councilman McDonald: Well see that's part of my confusion in all of this because I know that what Mr. Jeurissen is asking for is what 20% either go into an escrow or something and what I'm trying to understand then is at some point if Outlot C can be developed by either land to the south or to the west or somebody such as that, things would be reallocated at that point? Roger Knutson: No. Councilman McDonald: No, okay. Then is that where the comment comes in that we wouldn't assess the Outlot C because it's already been assessed? I'm just confused about where all this money and what it kind of goes it. That's the problem I'm having trying to sort through this. Todd Gerhardt: Today you have the opportunity to put all the assessments on Outlot A or 80% on Outlot A, 20% on Outlot C. Staff recommended not to put anything on Outlot C because we deem it as undevelopable but have allowed the developer, or the property owner Mr. Jeurissen to do research. Figure out how it might be developable but we weren't willing to take the risk of putting any assessments on Outlot C, and that's what we're talking about. We're measuring risk here. Councilman McDonald: Right. Todd Gerhardt: And putting the public at risk of losing those dollars down the line. Councilman McDonald: Okay, I can understand that part of it and I agree with that logic. That makes sense. What I'm having trouble with is this 20%, where does, I mean that's almost like asking us to reduce the assessment on Outlot A by 20% when in effect you're getting your money's worth for the work we did for Outlot A so you should pay the full amount. Outlot C, again it gets tangled up because it was part of the Town and Country. I understand they needed it but they weren't going to develop it either but because of the product it all got wrapped in together and they asked for all of this assessment so they had a legal right to do so. They commit people because they had a legal right. And you know you can contest it, you're right at that time and now your past it. Now you're coming back after the fact, almost 6 years. You just can't do that. So my question about C is that at some point, at some point if it's developable it's going to be part of an assessment. Someone's going to come in and say I want to put roads. I want to do all this and we're going to assess it based upon what, no. We're not going to assess it? Todd Gerhardt: No. Councilman McDonald: See, that's where I'm having trouble. 36 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Todd Gerhardt: Yeah. Roger Knutson: The developer will put in those improvements. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah. The City isn't going to initiate a road project to serve Outlot C. Councilman McDonald: Right. Todd Gerhardt: Just like Lennar is here. Somebody's going to potentially come through Sever Peterson's property and put a cul-de-sac in and somehow utilize or access this outlot, if they can. Councilman McDonald: Okay, then explain to me what does the assessment buy? What do I get for paying those fees? Paul Oehme: The current assessment? Councilman McDonald: Any assessment. Paul Oehme: Well the $600,000 is for the road improvements for Bluff Creek Boulevard, the collector roadway. Mayor Furlong: Which is north of the property. Paul Oehme: North of the property. It buys you the water to service the property. Potable water. It buys you sewer to extend to this property to hook up to city sewer services and then stormwater management as well for the collector roadway so it's the infrastructure necessary to service the parcel itself. Councilman McDonald: Okay, and that's what I thought it was for and you keep confusing me with all this stuff. And that's why we would charge them in the future on Outlot C because now you're going to provide. Okay see, you're going to provide this stuff. You're telling me we already paid for it so he doesn't have to pay for it again but he's, that's where I'm confused. You need to help me get through this on Outlot C. Mayor Furlong: On page 7 of the staff report. If I'm correct here Ms. Aanenson. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: These are the items that were included, that were included on the existing assessments, correct? Paul Oehme: Correct. Mayor Furlong: And they include the 2005 MUSA expansion project, the 101/Lyman Boulevard, all these components. Kate Aanenson: If I may Mayor. Mayor Furlong: Yep. Kate Aanenson: We met with all the property owners, Paul and I and Kimley-Horn over a year. 37 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Paul Oehme: Over a year. Mayor Furlong: In what timeframe did you have those? Kate Aanenson: 2005 because there's no way any one of these property owners could make their development happen unless we all worked together. We needed a collector road to go through that was identified in the AUAR, which is Bluff Creek Boulevard. That road needed to go through for them to get access between Audubon and Powers Boulevard so we spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to make that road happen. With that we brought in the trunk utilities. Had that not happened we would not be sitting here today because we wouldn't have projects going on in that area so that was the trunk project. As the City Manager stated, lots of times developers can just tie onto their own project without a city project but we were the engine that provided the mechanism for this, all these properties in the 2005 to go forward and if I pull up the aerials, so this is the road that we looked at. Bluff Creek Drive coming in and we worked, we tried to, that road but tweaked so many times trying to make sure that we didn't do it to any one property owner's detriment. Not all of it ended up in that, and a lot of the, working through elevations of the sewer line. The water line. Making sure that all the properties could be served off that. This piece of property up at the top is topographically gets serviced off of this road. That's the only way they can develop is coming off that road which the City built and assessed including the trunk sewer and water. If, in the future someone gets, if MnDOT vacates this right -0f --way and if someone, and Mr. Jeurissen can make the sewer and water line work and comes in, he would have to pay to hook on, with all the assessments pay to hook on for using the City's sewer and water. And maybe pay for the cost of the road. Depending on how that development works. Councilman McDonald: Okay. That makes some sense, thanks. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Other comments and thoughts regarding the items before us. I guess maybe try to lead through, with regard to the Jeurissen First Addition which is the creation of Outlets A, B, C and D. One of the issues there was the driveway access. Ms. Aanenson mentioned that as part of this, as part of this Outlot B would be dedicated to the City. Become City property, is that correct Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Or have a preservation easement. If Mr. Jeurissen wants to hold that we'd put a preservation easement over it limiting it's use. Mayor Furlong: Until such time, but. Kate Aanenson: In perpetuity because that will always be required for the shoreland district regs and for the PUD ordinance, and it's at the minimum for the area. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And is that dedication or preservation occur at the time of the Jeurissen First Addition? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Or, not at the Camden Ridge? 38 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Kate Aanenson: Correct, because it's under Mr. Jeurissen's control so we'd have to get it at the time of fmal plat with Mr. Jeurissen. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So what you were raising with the item is that because the access to be across the city property. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: On Outlot B, that it was your recommendation to limit that use to agricultural purposes Kate Aanenson: Agricultural, yeah for farming purposes and again you go look at what the city ordinance says it's much broader and I just want to make sure it's clear that there's not unintended consequences there for when you have a subdivision to the north, if there's other uses that you may or may not deem necessary going across a preservation area. Mayor Furlong: And I guess Mr. Knutson, is the, as the staff report currently recommends it says the words, and I'm reading on page 28 of 32, item 15. It says agricultural purposes. Does that meet with what staff is recommending? Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: It's not necessarily to everything that might be included in A-2? Roger Knutson: That's my understanding what staffs recommending. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Roger Knutson: I have some suggested, just tweaking on the language. Mayor Furlong: For this item? Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Roger Knutson: The existing driveway access to Trunk Highway 212 must be closed except for access for agricultural purposes only on Outlot C and then continue on with the rest of that paragraph. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Is the council comfortable with that item? Any objections to that suggested change? Then I guess the next item was with regard to the assessments that are being requested to be allocated, a portion of which to A and to C. We've had a lot of discussion. Staff is recommending that all of the assessments be included on A. Thoughts and comments on that? Is there support for that, for staff s recommendation or support for the applicant's? Councilman McDonald: Well now that I understand this a little bit better, I can see the logic of what the City is doing and I can understand why Mr. Jeurissen is asking us to do this now but again it's the risk to the City because I don't know if Outlot C can be developed and at that point I don't know that we can ever recover any of those costs so I'm not sure that I would be in favor of taking that kind of risk for the City. I think that yeah, it's fair what we're asking to put it all on the Oudot A so I would support that. Mayor Furlong: Okay. 39 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Councilman Laufenburger: I would too Mr. Mayor. The action that was taken, I believe Kate you described in '06, is that when the assessments were issued? Is that right? It seems to me that that decision was made based on the best information available at that time and there isn't anything that substantially changes that information according to our best data right now. Outlot C is not developable and if the, if Mr. Jeurissen can prove that it is developable then he gets the, I mean he can develop it if he chooses to so I would support that as well. I would support staffs recommendation on that. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilwoman Tjomhom: And Mr. Mayor I think I would too but part of the thing that I find complexing to me is the fact that I asked Kate earlier about what we were getting for having a PUD and I believe her answer was we were going to have Outlet C and B remain the way they are. Kate Aanenson: I'm sorry. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Or maybe I didn't hear you correctly. Mayor Furlong: Just B. Kate Aanenson: Just B, yep. Just B. Mayor Furlong: Which B preserves an extension of Bluff Creek corridor. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Right. Kate Aanenson: Exactly. Mayor Furlong: It was a similar type of corridor that was preserved with the property to the north when that. Councilwoman Tjornhom: So Outlot C had nothing to do with that rationale then for the PUD? Kate Aanenson: Well, the staff s opinion that it should but you know we met the minimum for the shoreland district and for the PUD as far as requirement for the 50% so we met the minimum. Again in good faith we said we'll decide that later. We'll pay the assessments now. We'll decide that later if it can be developed and there's a way to get to it, that decision can be made at a later date. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Would they have received a PUD if in your opinion Outlot C was developable? Kate Aanenson: Well, there's no access to it. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Right, but if there was would they still be getting a PUD? Kate Aanenson: Well they still would have to preserve 50% open space so they would, you know they'd have to dedicate more open space so it'd reduce the amount of potential buildable correct. Or buildable area, correct. Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Mayor Furlong: Okay. So there's support then for staff's recommendation with regard to the allocation of the assessment in it's entirety to Outlot A I'm hearing as well. And then with the other question with regard to the interest component, thoughts and comments there. Is there support? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, my same argument. Mr. Oehme made it clear that even at that time in '06 policy would have made it possible for us to be charging in excess of 8% interest, is that correct? Is that right? So 6% seemed, again I'm supporting the decision that was made by the council in '06 and I've got nothing to suggest that that was a bad decision so I would support that same interest rate. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilman McDonald: I guess the thing that gets me, I understand what Mr. Laufenburger is saying and you know I support it. The problem is, if you go back in 2006 the plans were to build it so this wouldn't have been that big of a problem. I mean everybody wanted to do this so the fact that they didn't, they had already made the commitment to do something. They backed out later. We did what we do as a city. We assess so. Mayor Furlong: Well and charge interest on assessments that are made until they are paid. Councilman McDonald: Right, and that's normal. I mean 61/o back then would have been within what the policy limits that we've kind of codified since then so we're doing the, we're treating him the same way we treated every other citizen in this community when it deals with assessments. Mayor Furlong: And there are still other outstanding assessments on other properties that were assessed at the same time as a part of this and all of those are paying 6% interest I assume, or being. Councilman Laufenburger: Being charged. Mayor Furlong: Those unpaid assessments are being charged at 6% so. Okay. Okay, I think I understand then where the council is on those items. With regard to the development itself, and now I'm moving to the Camden. Is there any other issue with regard to the Jeurissen First Addition that council had questions on or concern? Then let's move to the Camden Ridge. Thoughts and comments. Concerns about that. Again it appears to me to be a nice development and good balance between types of properties. Meets the ordinance. I do think and I appreciate the representative from Lennar agreeing with trying to locate that right -0f --way access to the north and that's something that can be, we have to make sure that that's in there. Maybe the comments or the minutes or however we need to do that but that will be incorporated and worked out with property owners prior to the final. Kate Aanenson: Then the only other thing I had on that Mayor if I may is, Mayor and council is the clarification on the fee. Get that new number for the stormwater fees. Mayor Furlong: And the stormwater fees and which condition number was that? That's on the Camden, right? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Page 16 and 17 Mayor Furlong: Of the same staff report? 41 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Kate Aanenson: And it's on, conditions of approval it's on page 30 but on 16 and 17 is where I went through and showed you what the, so if you go to page 30. Mayor Furlong: Do you have the condition number Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Number 10 on page 30. Under Water Resources. Mayor Furlong: The number should be how much? Kate Aanenson: It should be $104,930.25. Mayor Furlong: $104,930.25 and that's on 16.05 acres. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, so that would be the trunk fees paid at the time of final plat. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other thoughts or comments on the development? Again, there's a lot of issues that we have to deal with and that's fair and fine but it's nice to see development coming in and people wanting to continue to build homes in Chanhassen and it seems to be a nice development. Mr. Laufenburger. Councilman Laufenburger: Yeah I was just going to say that it seems to me that this topography is going to present some challenges to the builder and I expect that they'll continue to cooperate with the City in trying to address some of those challenges and just speaking personally I, looks like this might be a property that if it were available right now I might be moving into it instead of moving north of Highway 5. Mayor Furlong: We can keep that off the record if you'd like. Councilman Laufenburger: No, I've been very strong. I think south of Highway 5 has great quality of life and I'm pleased that a family with a young boy is going to be moving into our property but I'm excited for Lennar. It looks like this will be a great addition to that area. And also for Mr. Jeurissen. I think this is going to be a good property development for his property as well. Mayor Furlong: Point of clarification Mr. Hoffman. The trail that will extend south from the existing trail. Will that be put in as part of the development as well or is that something the City will be subsequently? Todd Hoffman: It will be put in as pad of the development and then. Mayor Furlong: A credit? Todd Hoffman: Yeah, the cost for the bituminous and the rock and the storm sewer structure will be paid back to Lennar. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Credited against their park dedication fees or paid back. Todd Hoffman: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And that's consistent with what we've done with other developments? Todd Hoffman: Yes it is. 42 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Mayor Furlong: Any other questions or comments? Let's go ahead with a motion then. We can go, is a single motion okay Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: Yes. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I was going to say. Mayor Furlong: Okay. I'm sorry. Kate Aanenson: I was just going to point out that the motion I have inhere is just for the Camden Ridge so you may want to just read the one that's in your, apologize for that, for the staff report. Mayor Furlong: So the one that's in the staff report you're saying is it complete? Kate Aanenson: For the first, for Jeurissen First Addition. Yes, that would be correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And then we also need. Kate Aanenson: I do have the one for the second. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So if I'm correct, we have the Jeurissen First Addition and we have to amend the language on condition 15 as recommended by Mr. Knutson, correct? And then on Camden Ridge. Kate Aanenson: Stormwater fees. Mayor Furlong: Stormwater fees which is condition 10. We have to correct that number. And then also the language for the right-of-way dedication. How does that incorporate into the motion for the preliminary? Kate Aanenson: That's actually part of the development contract for the First Addition. Mayor Furlong: For the? Kate Aanenson: Oh, actually. Mayor Furlong: No, this would be part of the Camden Ridge I believe, wouldn't it? Kate Aanenson: Actually I apologize. My recommendation on here is for all the motions that are in front of you tonight. Mayor Furlong: Okay, so we can go off the screen. Kate Aanenson: Yes you can. Mayor Furlong: But with regard to that right-of-way dedication. Kate Aanenson: We'll use the City Attorney's language that was stated earlier. Roger Knutson: That's the closing... 43 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Kate Aanenson: Yep. Mayor Furlong: No, that was, we're talking about two different things I think. Kate Aanenson: Okay. Mayor Furlong: Condition 15 dealt with the existing access, driveway access underneath Highway 212. Access to allow. Roger Knutson: Mayor, if I understand what you're talking about now an access in the Camden Addition. Mayor Furlong: In the Camden Addition, making sure that that northern access, that right-of-way is the full right-of-way for a public street. Roger Knutson: We'll add that as a condition to preliminary plat approval for Camden. Mayor Furlong: Okay, and so what number would that be? Kate Aanenson: Number, on page 28, number 15. Mayor Furlong: This is page 28 of the Camden Ridge? Kate Aanenson: Correct. It says existing driveway access to 212 must be closed. Mayor Furlong: No, that's not it. Councilman McDonald: No, Mayor's talking about the other access. Mayor Furlong: Northern access. Kate Aanenson: Okay. It's not in here. The only place it was placed in was in the Preserve because that's the part of the plat that it would go with, if I'm correct. Mayor Furlong: How about engineering conditions, would be a good place Mr. Oehme? Kate Aanenson: That's where I'm looking. PaulOehme: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Engineering condition 22. Is that reasonable? Roger Knutson: Sure. Mayor Furlong: Any other components before we get into a motion here? Mr. Laufenburger, would you like to make a motion? Councilman Laufenburger: Sure. Mr. Mayor I move that the Chanhassen City Council approves the final plat for Jeurissen First Addition and a development contract with legal counsel recommendation on wording changes to item 15. And the stormwater fees, Kate the stormwater fees are also part of the Jeurissen One, right? M Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Kate Aanenson: No Councilman Laufenburger. Okay, alright. So that's the final plat for Jeurissen First Addition and a development contract using the City Attorney's language for item number 15 on access from 212. And recommend that City Council approve the rezoning, subdivision and conditional use permit for the Camden Ridge development subject to the conditions of the staff report and adoption of the Findings of Fact and approve the development contract to permit the grading of the site prior to final plat approval with modified stormwater fees, as outlined under condition 10 in the amount of $104,930.25 and engineering condition number 22, preserving a northern right-of-way or preserving a right-of-way to the north, to the property straight north of Camden Ridge. Paul Oehme: 60 feet wide. Councilman Laufenburger: 60 feet wide. Kate Aanenson: No, 26 feet. Councilman McDonald: No, no. We're talking two different accesses. Kate Aanenson: Oh, I'm sorry. Okay. I keep ... I'm sorry. You're right. You're right. Mayor Furlong: I'm glad I'm not the only one. Yes, Mr. Knutson. Roger Knutson: If you'd rather say rezoning, subdivision and conditional use permit etc, say the rezoning, preliminary plat and conditional use permit to just make it clear what we're approving. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay. So the language would read, move to approve the rezoning, preliminary plat. Kate Aanenson: Sorry. I'm sorry. I was going to edit it on the fly. Councilman Laufenburger: And conditional use permit for Camden Ridge development citing both the stormwater fees and the engineering condition number 22 for the northern right-of-way of 60 feet. Councilwoman Ernst: Second that. Mayor Furlong: You're brave. Thank you. Any questions, especially clarification on the motions before us. I want to make sure it's clear for everyone so. I think it is. Thank you for everybody for working through those. Again, a lot of minutia here but overall a good development and benefit for all and will be a nice addition. Nice new number of homes for families to move into the area so with that is there any other discussion? Hearing none, we've had a motion that's been made and seconded. Councilman Laufenburger moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded that the City Council approve Jeurissen 1" Addition plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedicated access to Outlot A must be provided prior to recording the Jeurissen 1" Addition plat. 2. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed except for access for agricultural purposes only on Outlot C , Jeurissen 1" Addition. An access easement across Outlot B, Jeurissen 1" Addition shall be recorded which shall follow the existing driveway alignment with a 45 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 width of approximately 26 feet. Said easement shall be vacated should alternate access to Outlot C, Jeurissen I ' Addition become available. Unless the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvement assessment, City Project 06-05 levied against the property is paid in full before the final plat is recorded, the assessment is reapportioned against Outlot A. The principal of $601,212.65 was deferred until development and it has been accruing 6% since 2009. As of June 6, 2013 the assessment amount due was $796,302.31. 4. The Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone, "Outlot B" shall be conveyed to the City by warranty deed free and clear of any encumbrances or a preservation easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the final plat is recorded. 5. Before any development plans are submitted for Outlot C the property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the City to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, Jeurissen I' Addition. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Development of Outlot C Jeurissen V Addition would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternate Urban Areawide Review, AUAR. Any development would need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman Laufenburger moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded that the City Council approves rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A-2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R), preliminary plat of approximately 23 acres into 32 single family lots, 26 twinhome lots and 7 outlots; and a conditional use permit to allow for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District for the Camden Ridge development subject to the following conditions and adoption of the Planning Commission Findings of Fact: Buildin¢ Conditions: 1. Demolition permits are required for the removal of any existing structures. 2. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 4. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 5. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 6. The applicant and/or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. 46 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Engineering Conditions: 1. The developer must obtain right-of-way for the part of River Rock Road that connects to Bluff Creek Boulevard. 2. The proposed "Easement Detail" must be revised to include how the easements around the perimeter of the twinhome lots will be platted. 3. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail near Outlot F so that it will meet ADA standards. 4. The contours near the northwest comer of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7 must be smoothed out. 5. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) between lots on the north side of Street B to show the grading will allow water to drain away from the structures. 6. The final plans must note the survey benchmark on the plan set. 7. The final plans must note the existing and proposed elevations at the corners of each lot. 8. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. 9. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 10. Retaining Wall B must be moved so that it is outside the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. 11. A Homeowners Association must be created to take ownership of all retaining walls and the draintile along the face of Retaining Wall B. 12. Local streets must be within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way. 13. At final plat, the Engineering Department will review the profile of Street A between stations 2+00 and 4+00 to ensure the profile meets the minimum length requirements for vertical curves. 14. The proposed centerline grade at the intersection of River Rock Drive and Street A must not be greater than 3%. 47 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 15. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed except for access for agricultural purposes only on Outlot C, Jeurissen I' Addition. An access easement across Outlot B, Jeurissen I' Addition, shall be recorded which shall follow the existing driveway alignment with a width of approximately 26 feet. Said easement shall be vacated should alternate access to Oudot C, Jeurissen I" Addition become available. 16. The developer's engineer must design a Street C typical section. 17. The development is adjacent to Bluff Creek Boulevard and is therefore subject to the arterial collector fee at the time of final plat for Camden Ridge. The fee shall be $55,030.56 ($2,400 x 22.9294 acres of Outlot A, Jeurissen I' Addition). 18. The developer's engineer must incorporate pressure -reducing valves and a surge protection system into the watermain plans. 19. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBMH-102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. 20. Unless the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements assessment, City Project 06-05, levied against the property described on Exhibit "A" is paid in full before the plat is recorded the assessment is reapportioned against Outlot A. As of June 6, 2013, the assessment amount with accrued interest was $796,302.31. 21. Water and sewer hook-up fees must be paid at the time of final plat. 22. Preserving 60 feet of right-of-way to the property straight north of Camden Ridge. Fire Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. Temporary street signs must be installed prior to home construction. 3. No burning permits will be issued. Any trees removed must either be chipped on site or removed from site. 4. Water mains shall be made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Posts, fences, utility boxes etc. shall not be placed near fire hydrants which would hinder firefighters to quickly locate and/or operate fire hydrants in a safe manner. Natural Resources Conditions: 1. The applicant shall increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. M Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 2. The applicant shall plant a minimum of 130 trees in the development. 3. The applicant shall diversify the plant schedule so that no one species comprises more than one third of the total number of trees. 4. The applicant shall specify vegetation proposed for Outlots A, B and C. 5. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to the city prior to final approval. 6. The applicant shall preserve trees #1301, 1302, 1303. These trees along with trees #1393- 1398 shall be protected by fencing prior to and during any grading or construction activities. 7. The developer shall install signage at lot lines to demarcate the Bluff Creek Primary Zone. Parks Conditions: 1. Full park dedication fees shall be collected per city ordinance in lieu of requiring parkland dedication. 2. Construction of Bluff Creek Trail from its current southerly terminus, extending between the new homes and Bluff Creek to a terminus point at TH 212. The developer shall provide design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the "Bluff Creek Trail." All construction documents, including material costs, shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be 10 feet in width, surfaced with asphalt and constructed to meet all city specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for the cost of the aggregate base, asphalt surfacing, and storm water systems utilized to construct the trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials noted. Labor and installation, design, engineering and testing services are not reimbursable expenses. Plannine Conditions: The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as its portion of the 2005 AUAR prior to recording the final plat. 2. The developer shall prepare a noise analysis for noise generated by traffic on Highway 212. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which shall be implemented by the developer. 3. The Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone, Outlot "B", shall be conveyed to the City by warranty deed free and clear of any encumbrances or a preservation easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the plat is recorded. 49 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 4. Before any development plans are submitted for Outlot C, the property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, Jeurissen I" Addition. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Development of Outlot C Jeurissen I" Addition would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternate Urban Areawide Review, AUAR. Any development would need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR. 5. The property owner must advise the city of the intended use of Outlot C, Jeurissen 1 " Addition, and how it shall be accessed. This Outlot may not be developable or accessible in the future. 6. Final plat approval will be contingent on the developer resolving the access issue. Either an access easement or right-of-way must be in place prior to any site development. Individual lots may not exceed the maximum hard cover per lot established in the compliance table. Water Resources Conditions: Land disturbance within the first twenty feet of the Bluff Creek Overlay District setback shall not be allowed unless the applicant can demonstrate that the goal cannot be achieved without the proposed disturbance. 2. A mitigation/restoration plan must be provided for any disturbance within the Bluff Creek Overlay District or setback from the BCOR. 3. Trail must be aligned to minimize the encroachment into the BCOR primary zone and minimize loss of natural vegetation and habitat. 4. Efforts must be made to minimize the number of inlets into each pond 5. The proposed ponds must be designed with a forebay. 6. The plans must demonstrate how water quality basin #1 and water quality basin #3 will be accessed. This includes all inlets, outlets and filtration benches as well as sediment removal from forebay and water quality volume. 7. The stormwater design shall, to the greatest extent practicable, seek to maximize infiltration, extend detention times and protect Bluff Creek from scour and other erosive conditions. 50 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 8. The applicant must evaluate downstream flow conditions as indicated in Section 19-144. 9. A Surface Water Pollution Plan and all required elements must be provided to the city for review. This plan must be compliant with NPDES requirements as well as the requirements of Chapter 19 of city code. 10. SWMP trunk fees due at final plat are estimated to be $104,930.25. 11. The development must comply with the MN Rules chapter 6120 and the DNR must issue their concurrence to this effect. 12. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. Grading activities have been observed within this area along the south side of Bluff Creek. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Any such areas that have been disturbed through the removal or addition of soils material prior to approval shall be addressed prior to commencement of other grading activities but no later than seven (7) days from approval. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman Laufenburger moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded that the City Council approves the Development Contract for grading of Camden Ridge subject to the following conditions: If the Preserve at Bluff Creek 5th Addition final plat is not recorded, the developer for Camden Ridge must acquire the right-of-way for River Rock Drive South to connect to Bluff Creek Boulevard. 2. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail near Outlot F. 3. The contours near the northwest corner of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7 must be smoothed out. 4. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) between lots on the north side of Street B to show the grading will allow water to drain away from the structures. 5. An escrow totaling $105,376.87 (110% of the estimated erosion control for this development) is required before site grading begins. 6. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. 7. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 8. Retaining Wall B must be moved so that it is outside the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. 9. An escrow totaling $66,709.50 (110% of the estimated cost of retaining wall construction) is required before work on the retaining walls begins. 51 Chanhassen City Council — July 22, 2013 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Furlong: Thank you everybody. Appreciate all your help. That completes our items of new business this evening. Let's move onto Council Presentations. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS: Councilman McDonald: Yes, as everyone on the council knows I'm part of Southwest Transit and we've started going through a number of things dealing with light rail as it comes down to Eden Prairie and so there was a meeting last week with the Mayor and Mr. Gerhardt, kind of preliminary to just kind of look at you know the effect upon the cities. What's going to happen is, is that Southwest is going to put together kind of their position paper on all of this as to what's going to happen to Southwest Station, the light rail and all of those things. That will be sent down to the City so we will be getting a paper from Southwest Transit that we're going to ask that the cities review, edit and then approve and then with that we will be able to talk with kind of one voice and give direction back to staff at Southwest Transit as to how the cities feel that Southwest Transit should proceed in the future so I just wanted to bring everyone up to date on that. And you should see it probably before, about the end of July you should get, I don't know if it will be in time for our fust meeting in August or not but that is the plan is to try to get it you know down to City Councils by then. Todd Gerhardt: I have Len Simich already scheduled for our work session first meeting in August. Councilman McDonald: Okay, Todd Gerhardt: And I think he plans on presenting that paper to the council. Councilman McDonald: Okay. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Other council presentations? Councilwoman Ernst. Councilwoman Ernst: Yes I would, thank you. So I just wanted to really congratulate Paul. We had, I sit on the Metro Cities Board of Directors and we had a vacancy for a TAC position. The Transportation Advisory Council position and there were approximately 8 candidates that submitted their resume for this position and obviously it was a no brainer that there was a consensus that Paul was the best candidate for the position. With his leadership skills, his project management skills and all the road construction projects that you've had and the successes with those, as well as having the resources and the network for obtaining funding for these projects so congratulations Paul. Well deserved and I'm excited that you're going to be the best candidate for the position. Excited to see what you're going to do with that so. Paul Oehme: Thank you council member. Yeah, looking forward to my service on the committee so Councilwoman Ernst: Great. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Other council presentations? Mr. Laufenburger. Councilman Laufenburger: Oh Mr. Mayor I try to reserve my comments about the Red Birds because. Mayor Furlong: When? 52 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO. 7/31/13 2013-13 ATTENTION Carole Hoeft RE: Jeurissen Ridge Document Recording ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 7/22/13 Development Contract 1 7/22/13 Preservation Easement 1 7/12/13 Title Commitment 1 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US Final Plat M lars 2 pages) 3 1"=200' scale paper copies of final plat 1 7/25/13 Final Plat Approval Letter THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS COPY TO: ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ® For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints SIGNED�(MI ES_I l o -g A At ,1 Kim Meuwi sen, 52) 227-1107 N enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. SCANNED TO: CAMPBELL KNUTSON ATTN: CAROLE HOEFT 317 EAGANDALE OFFICE CENTER 1380 CORPORATE CENTER CURVE EAGAN, MN 55121 RECORDING FOR: Jeurissen Ridge Enclosed are the following for recordation: FROM: CITY OF CHANHASSEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD PO Box 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 V Final Plat Mylars ("Official Copy") no larger than 22" x 34" VTTuee, 1" = 200' scale pao ^copy of the final plat (one copy each for Carver County Auditor, Assessor and Surveyor) Signed Development Contract ■ O ■ . f - . -; - i - - 1 ■ , -�X M . - V Easements: Preservation Easement ❑ Other: ) n ! - 0-,, Qtta96 10 63' A recent copy of the title commitment. ❑ COly of—W1-+j*-- -pproving j41 Dat The City of Chanhassen has received the following, as required: aFinal Plat Mylars ("City Copy") ❑%'f" = 200' scale mylar reduction of the final plat it MW ❑ 1" = 200' scale pap reduction of the final plat (with street names and lot and block numbers only) At�� ❑ Security: $ , from (bank name) ❑ Cash fee: $�QD.' (FP¢z�� � 46cr dcr-.(ace+ A/aD— irwo:ced -11-31 13 El( Digital copy of the final plat in .dxf and .tif formats (.pdf compatible) in Carver County coordinates ❑ Electronic Copy of Drainage Model Developer has been notified that the following must be done before the plat can be filed: ❑ Current year property taxes must be paid in full and any delinquent property taxes or green acres taxes must also be paid. T ua x �, v, e i�STr y��r� + p GY G:\PLAN1Form plat recording chxklist-docx Building Inspections Dear Mr. Jeurissen: Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.2271190 This letter is to confirm that on July 22, 2013, the Chanhassen City Council approved: Engineering Jeurissen Ridge (formerly known as Jeurissen la` Addition) plat subject to the Phone:52.2271160 Fax:5followingconditions: Fax: 952.227 1170 Finance July 25, 2013 CITY OF Ridge plat. CgANgASSEN easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the final Park Recreation7.120 Mr. Bruce Jeurissen 7700 Market Boulevard B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC PBox 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 19450 281" Street Fax:952.2271110 Belle Plaine, MN 56011-5010 Administration Re: Jeurissen Ridge (formerly known as Jeurissen 1" Addition) Phone: 952.2271100 Fax: 952.2271110 Planning Case 2013-13 Building Inspections Dear Mr. Jeurissen: Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.2271190 This letter is to confirm that on July 22, 2013, the Chanhassen City Council approved: Engineering Jeurissen Ridge (formerly known as Jeurissen la` Addition) plat subject to the Phone:52.2271160 Fax:5followingconditions: Fax: 952.227 1170 Finance 1. Dedicated access to Outlot A must be provided prior to recording the Jeurissen Phone: 952.2271140 Ridge plat. Fax:952.2271110 easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the final Park Recreation7.120 2. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed except for access for Phone: 952.2271120 agricultural purposes only on Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge. An access easement Fax: 952.2271110 across Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge shall be recorded which shall follow the existing ll g Fax:952.2271110 driveway alignment with a width of approximately 26 feet. Said easement shall Recreation Center be vacated should alternate access to Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge become available. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 3. Unless the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvement assessment (City Project 06-05) Fax: 952.227.1404 levied against the property is paid in full before the final plat is recorded, the Planning & assessment is reapportioned against Outlot A. The principal of $601,212.65 was Natural Resources deferred until development and it has been accruing 6% interest since 2009. As Phone: 952.227.1130 of June 6, 2013 the assessment amount due was $796,302.31. Fax: 952.227.1110 Chanhassen is a Community for Life . Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 4. The Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone, "Outlot B" shall be conveyed to Public Works the City by warranty deed free and clear of any encumbrances, or a preservation 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the final Fax: 952.227.1310 plat is recorded. Senior Center 5. Before any development plans are submitted for Outlot C the property owner shall Phone: 952.227.1125 provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a Fax:952.2271110 topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for Web Site the City to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life . Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Mr. Bruce Jeurissen July 25, 2013 Page 2 Jeurissen Ridge. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Development of Oudot C, Jeurissen Ridge would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). Any development. would need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR. And the development contract for Jeurissen Ridge (formerly known as Jeurissen 1" Addition). Two signed mylar copies of the final plat shall be submitted to our office for signatures. One 1 "=200' scale mylar reduction of the final plat and one 1 "=200' scale paper reduction of the final plat with just street names and lot and block numbers shall be submitted. The executed development shall be submitted to the City. In addition, a digital copy in .dxf format and a digital copy in .tif format (pdf compatible) in Carver County coordinates of the final plat shall be submitted. The City will submit all the necessary documents to Carver County for recording. Permanent access to Outlot A, Jeurissen Ridge must be in place prior to recording the final plat. A warranty deed for Outlot B or executed preservation easement shall be prepared and executed for recording with the final plat documents. Additionally, all current year taxes must be paid in full and any delinquent property taxes or green acres taxes must also be paid. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or by email at bgenerousna ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official c: Joe Jablonski, Lennar John Chadwick, Chadwick Group, Inc. g:\plan\2013 planning casm\2013-13 camden ridge\appmval letterjeurimen ridge.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA JEURISSEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT JEURISSEN RIDGE AGREEMENT dated JULY 22, 2013 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and, B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for JEURISSEN Ridge (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, finnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the plat. 3. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plan: Final plat approved JULY 22, 2013, prepared by Pioneer Engineering. 4. Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC ATTN: BRUCE JEURISSEN 19450 281sT STREET BELLE PLAINS, MN 56011-5010 Phone: 952-873-6020 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Telephone (952) 227-1100 5. Other Special Conditions. A. Dedicated access to Outlot A must be provided prior to recording the plat B. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed except for access for agricultural purposes only on Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge. An access easement across Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge shall be recorded which shall follow the existing driveway alignment with a width of approximately 26 feet. Said easement shall be vacated should alternate access to Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge become available. C. Unless the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements assessment, City Project 06-05, levied against the property described on Exhibit "A" is paid in full before the plat is recorded the assessment is reapportioned against Outlot A. As of June 6, 2013, the assessment amount with accrued interest was $796,302.31. D. The Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone, Outlot "B", shall be conveyed to the City by warranty deed free and clear of any encumbrances or a preservation easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the plat is recorded. E. Before any development plans are submitted for Outlot C the property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Development of Outiot C Jeurissen Ridge would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternate Urban Area wide Review, AUAR. Any development would need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR 2 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: l Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor AND: �&/_ odd Gerhardt, City Manager B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC BY:IC%! �� I Bruce J i ' en, Its Chief Manager The foregoing -3 instrument was acknowledged before me this � day of 2013, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayer, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the C of hanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and Pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. A0 STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. KAREN J. ENGELHARDT COUNTY OF e� ) fbcfore Notary Public•Minnesota 1y Conxniss Expires Jan 31, 2015The foregoing instrument was acknowledgeme this p�� day of 2013, Bruce Jeurissen, Chief Manager of B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, a Minn to Limited Liability Company, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PFJ DRAFTED BY: � City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 PATRICK J NEAMN Chanhassen, MN 55317ia- ON _00-00-- --- NMAr►ueuc•M"jM= (952)227-1100 i46 t0ftJW'a1'2111115 EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota (referred to herein as Tract A). ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest comer of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Section Line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest corner of said Section and place of beginning. Be a three -cornered piece in Southwest comer of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, ALSO: Beginning at the Southeast comer of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, North of Range 23 West; thence south along the quarter -quarter section line a distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14; thence east along the north line of said Carver County Road No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the aforementioned quarter -quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26, thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter -quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of beginning (referred to herein as Tract B). EXCEPT: that part of Tract A which lies Easterly of LINE 1 described below. LINE 1. Commencing at the north quarter comer of said Section 26; thence run west on an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section 1634.23 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 478.28 feet; thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. and EXCEPT that part of Tract B which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of LINE 2 described below: LINE 2. Commencing at the point of termination of Line 1 described above; thence run east on an azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 seconds along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds for 448.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 feet; thence on an azimuth of 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet; thence on an azimuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating. Together with right of access retained in Quit Claim Deed Document No. 310751 pursuant to Access Driveway Permit dated August 26, 2002. MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _ day of 20_. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_, by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, is made this 2.Z AA day of 44 2013, by B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Grantor"), for the benefit of the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"). The Grantor, in consideration of good and valuable consideration provided by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants the City a permanent easement ("Easement") for flowage and preservation and protection of wetlands, wetland buffer areas, steep slopes, woodlands and open spaces over, under, on and across the following land within the City of Chanhassen, County of Carver, State of Minnesota and legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" (the "Easement Property"). Grantor, its successors and assigns, hereby covenants and agrees as follows: The following are prohibited within the Easement Property, except as permitted by this Agreement, unless the Grantor obtains the consent of the City or a release of this Easement or portion thereof by the City. A. Constructing, installing, or maintaining anything made by man, including but not limited to buildings, structures, walkways, fences, fireplaces, clothes line poles, playground equipment, roads or hardcover of any nature whatsoever, except: 1) feeders, bird houses, and other devices intended to foster wildlife; and 2) a 26 foot wide driveway to be used solely to access Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge Addition, from Pioneer trail, solely for agricultural purposes, which use must cease when Outlot C is no longer used for agricultural purposes or if an alternate access is provided to Outlot C. The driveway provided for in this section shall be maintained in its current condition and location, as legally described in attached Exhibit B and depicted in the attached Exhibit C. B. Cutting, mowing or removing shrubs or other vegetation, and cutting or removing trees, except for tree disease control by or as directed by a governmental agency and except by special permit for maintenance or as part of an approved vegetation management plan. Grantors may remove brush, buckthorn, diseased or dead trees of any size, and noxious weeds. C. Except in connection with the rights to maintain the driveway in its current condition and location allowed under Paragraph 1A, excavation or filling or material alteration of grade, including changes to the size, depth or contour of the wetland; dredging, mining or removal of earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material. D. Free roaming of domestic animals (i.e., horses, sheep, chickens, etc.). E. The deposit of waste, yard waste, or debris. F. Activity detrimental to the screening of the neighboring properties. G. Application of fertilizers, whether natural or chemical. H. Application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. I. The application of herbicides, pesticides, and insecticides, except for noxious weed control by or as directed by a governmental agency. Outside storage of any kind. K. Activity detrimental to the preservation of the trees, slopes, scenic beauty, vegetation, and wildlife. Installation of public trails within the Easement Property required by the City as a condition of approval of the Jeurissen Ridge Addition and consistent with approved plans and conditions of the Development Contract for the Camden Ridge plat is deemed to be approved by the City for purposes of Paragraph 1. 2. Grantor, its successors and assigns, further grants the City the affirmative right, but not the obligation to do the following on the easement premises: A. Preserve, improve, and enhance the wetland, creek, buffer, trees, vegetation, and natural habitat by altering, clearing, and removing trees or other vegetation, by changing the contour of the land, by planting trees or other vegetation, and taking all appropriate actions to comply with federal, state, and local regulations related to wetlands, including the Bluff Creek Management Plan, the Bluff Creek TMDL and the Second General Surface Water Management Plan. The City's rights under this provision shall not interfere with the use of the driveway as provided under Paragraph I of this Agreement. 1715830 2 B. Enter upon the easement premises at any time to enforce compliance with the terns of this instrument. Further, the City may enforce the terms of this Easement by any proceeding in law or in equity to restrain violation, to compel compliance, or to recover damages, including attorneys' fees and costs of the enforcement actions. Grantor is not liable for the actions of any third party, other than its employees, agents or contractors, which may violate the terms of this Easement, unless Grantor, its employees, agents or contractors had actual knowledge of the violation and failed to take reasonable action to stop the violation. 3. Failure to enforce any provision of this Easement upon a violation of it cannot be deemed a waiver of the right to do so as to that or any subsequent violation. 4. Invalidation of any of the terms of this Easement will in no way affect any of the other terms, which will remain in full force and effect. 5. This Easement does not convey a right to the public use of the Easement Property nor does it convey any right of possession in the Easement Property to the public or the City. Access by the City to the Easement Property is limited to access necessary for purposes of inspection and enforcement as specified in paragraph 2 above. The City is not be entitled to share in any award or other compensation given in connection with a condemnation or negotiated acquisition of all or any part of the Easement Property by any authority having the power of eminent domain. The City hereby waives any right it may have to such an award or compensation. 6. Acceptance of this Easement by the City and the recording of this document constitutes the City's consent to be bound by its terms. 7. This Easement runs with the Easement Property and be binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns, and inures to the benefit of the City, its successors and assigns. 1715830 3 8. This Easement may be amended or released on whole or in part upon consent of the City. 9. The City acknowledges that the Grantor's conveyance of the herein contained Easement constitutes a gift to the City, and the City agrees to sign the "Donee Acknowledgement" portion of Internal Revenue Service Form 8283, as soon as such Form has been completed and assigned by a licensed appraiser. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this instrument on the date first written above. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 171583v5 4 GRANTOR: B. ELMER FAMELY FARMS, LLC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2013, by 4i ,e C , �u p' i 5 e',, the of B. Ehn r Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on its behalf. PATRICK J NEAMN Notary' 1c NOTARY PUBLIC•MWNESM C;s. m®eblf E� w Jan. am 171583v.2 GRANTEE: CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: 7hoPas Furlong, I City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �j 0CA day of 2013, by Thomas A. Furlong and by Todd Gerhardt respectively the Mayor and *MThe ager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority grantedlby its City Council. 01AKAREN I ENGELHARDT Notary Public -Minnesota y Cam *N10n E)OM Jen 91, 2015 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP 171583v5 6 1 *:1'.11:31111:1 Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. 171583v5 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Driveway OUTLOT B A OUTLOT A R g �o n 4 rJ v f� i� �� t9 04 OUTLOT C d� 9' ter• A K' -SE CORNER OF WILT B 6g a a m Sege F Fast Proaostyd desulption for an ingress andr nt A 26.00 fool wide easement fa agrees and egress purpasea lying ews, under did oaass Outlet B, dEUWSSEN RIDGE, oecrdng to the recorded Piet thaeo', caner C ty, Minnesota, the cenledhe of soid eox ent is tle llm,d as mo CoCchmmencing at the cast. alt came. of said Lady B; fence on on assumed burring o5 .70 r 38 degrees OB miputea 61 sthe ce edin tang the eouMeasterfy the of aoitl OgOol B, a tletafce 1 i66J0 feel, l0 11e Ptnl 1of - fe t; tb m the North M deg ee be described; Mseem ds M 68 eegsta 04 minutes f ae Wa C West, o distance 47.60 feet; Montt n511 at, and <1 distance of 1 SS safeet; hent, a distance 64 of eelfM.061 feet; Meow Na:n e9 degrees Q metates 5f 51.0 a t. to a tlea nand of 156.07 Outlet feet; thence North 64 ocgreoc d minutes 43 tingrws West. a d;etanas of 51.08 fat, to a ecste.ly fine of WOoI C, said JFURS'.FN RIpGF and ttwe [armneling. • 1 Ifi 9fETCH DUES NOT PURPORT TD SHOW THF EJOSTFNCE OR NONFIfS CE M ANY FNCRDACHMFNTS FROM OR ONTO 157E HEREON DESCRIBED LAND, EASEMENTS Or RECORD OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS WH -CH AFFECT SAID LAND OR ANY IMPROK_MENTS TO SAID LAND. 171583v5 8 Depiction of Driveway I-I�>",c to Ocelot C aQ s Oudot B to Pi Traa ISSUED BY Printed Date:July 12, 2013 NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY AS AGENT FOR NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NUMBER: 40852-12-11653 SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: June 23, 2013 at 08:00 AM 2. Policy (or Policies) to be issued: (a) 2006 ALTA Owner's Policy Proposed Insured: U.S. Home Corporation , a Delaware Corporation (b) 2006 ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: Revised jdL-* ft 2011 Policy Amount 3. Fee Simple interest in the Land described in this Commitment is owned, at the Commitment Date, by: 8. Ellmor Farnily Farms, LLC -,---WW Ar'tNti*diPei3i cbttipany The Fee Owner was conveyed title by the Limited Warranty Deed, dated November 8, 2010, filed November 12, 2010, as Document No. 528862. 4. The Land referred to in the Commitment is described as follows: SEE SCHEDULE A CONTINUED ATTACHED HERETO FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: ABSTRACT Property Carver County Property Address: 1500 Pioneer Trail, Chanhassen, MN 55318 Counter Signed: ccrz�� Authorized Signatory Underwriter Name and Address: North American Title Insurance Company 1855 Gateway Blvd., Suite 600 Concord, CA 94520 Issuing Agent Name and Address: North American Title Company 5001 American BNd., Suite 255 Bloomington, MN 55437 2006 ALTA Commitment (40852-12-11653.PFD(40852-12-11653191) Schedule A S241ANOTC.3679 Rev. &IM010 ISSUED BY NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY AS AGENT FOR NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NUMBER: 40852-12-11653 SCHEDULE B - SECTION I REQUIREMENTS The following requirements must be met: a. Pay the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or according to the mortgage to be insured. b. Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. c. Documents satisfactory to us creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed, delivered and recorded: 1. Satisfaction or Partial Release of a Mortgage executed by B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, to Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America, dated September 23, 2011, filed October 3, 2011, as Document No. 543137 and in the amount of $250,000.00. 2. Satisfaction or Release, or Partial Release, of the Assignment of Rents executed by B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, to Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America, dated September 23, 2011, filed October 3, 2011, as Document No. 543138. 3. Satisfaction or Partial Release of a Mortgage executed by B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, to Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America, dated July 27, 2012, filed August 1, 2012, as Document No. 559441. As corrected by the Corrective Mortgage filed November 5, 2012 as Document No. 565233 (adding a statement of maximum principal dollar amount of $100,000.00). Note: The above Mortgage was satisfied by a Satisfaction of Mortgage filed June 4, 2013 as Document No. 578011. A copy of said Satisfaction is not yet available for viewing at Carver County. 4. Deleted by Title Company. 5. Payment of deferred Green Acres taxes. Note: The Land is subject to Green Acres tax deferment. A payoff statement must be obtained from Carver County at least five working days prior to closing. 6. Payment of a deferred assessment for Bluff Creek Blvd., in the amount of $601,212.65, plus interest Note: The above assessment has been deferred until development. If not paid at development, it will be re -allocated to individual lots. 7. Deleted by Title Company. 8. Payment of Levied or Pending Special Assessments, if any. 9. Deleted by Title Company. 10. Adequate evidence provided in writing from B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC which authorizes the conveyance of the subject property. Written evidence, which may include the articles of organization or member control agreement, must also state that the member executing the conveyance has been given the authority to act on behalf of the company. 11. Warranty Deed from B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, to U.S. Home Corporation. Note: The Survey by Pioneer Engineering, P.A., dated November 30, 2012, indicates that there are wells located on the Land. Also, the Option Agreement dated November 16, 2012, includes a private sewage treatment disclosure. COMMITMENT NUMBER 40852-12-11653 SCHEDULE B -SECTION I REQUIREMENTS (Continued) 12. This examination was done without the benefit of an Abstract of Tile and from the Carver County records. 13. The proposed legal description on the Survey by Pioneer Engineering, P.A., dated November 30, 2012, includes less property than is currently included in the description of Carver Countys property identification number 25.0232300. A tax parcel split will therefore be required. 14. Section 5.6 of the Option Agreement dated November 16, 2012 requires an access easement over the adjacent "Degler' parcel. Said easement must be submitted to the Company for review prior to closing. Upon review of the submitted information, additional requirements and/or exceptions may be made. 15. Satisfaction of a Mortgage executed by B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, to Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America, dated January 30, 2013, filed February 5, 2013, as Document No. 571094 and in the amount of $150,000.00. 16. Release of the Assignment of Rents executed by B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, to Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America, dated January 30, 2013 and filed February 5, 2013 as Document No. 571095. Note: A Release of the above Assignment of Rents will not be required upon successful completion of Item B -I, No. 15, herein. 17. Payment of unpaid first half 2013 taxes in the amount of $285.60, including penalty. Said payoff amount is valid through July 31, 2013. d. You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. e. Affidavit of Mortgagor or Affidavit of Buyer is required on all transactions. On sale transactions, North American Title Company requires a Sellers Affidavit and a Certificate of Real Estate Value. f. If an Owners Policy of Tile Insurance is not ordered at the closing, the Company's "Notice of Availability of Owners Title Insurance" form must be signed by the buyers. g. The "gap period" will be insured if this transaction is closed by North American Tile Company. The gap refers to the gap from the effective date of this commitment to the closing date and the gap from the closing date to the recording date of the instrument to be insured. h. This Commitment is for the exclusive use of this Company and its affiliates in closing the transaction described herein. Anyone else closing off this Commitment shall be liable to this Company for all loss and damage, including payment of all charges and fees incurred related to the preparation of this commitment. I. If the property is subject to any private assessments for association dues or otherwise, we must be provided a current statement showing all sums are paid or the amount of any outstanding charges. j. NOTE: The following is not a part of Schedule B, and is shown for information only. This will not be included on the final loan policy. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED AT CLOSING: 1) Sellers Tax Information Number or Social Security Number. 2) Sellers full address after the closing. 3) Identification will be required from all parties required to sign documents at closing. COMMITMENT NUMBER 40852-12-11653 SCHEDULE B - SECTION I REQUIREMENTS (Continued) - END OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION I - ALTA Commihnent Schedule B - Section 1(06117/06) (40652-12-11653.PFD/40852-12-11653191) S24MNOTC3669 Rn. 8232010 ISSUED BY NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY AS AGENT FOR NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NUMBER: 40852-12-11653 SCHEDULE B - SECTION II EXCEPTIONS Any policy we issue will have the following exceptions unless they are taken care of to our satisfaction. 1. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term "encroachment" includes encroachments of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 13 of the Loan Policy, and 1 through 9 of the Owner's Policy, that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Commitment and prior to the recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records (when a Loan Policy is to be issued) and prior to the recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A (when an Owner's Policy is to be issued). 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the Effective Date of the Commitment but prior to the date the Proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 4. Any lien or right to lien for services, labor or materials heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Easements or daims of easements, not shown by the public records. 6. All assessments and Taxes for the year 2013 and thereafter. 7. No coverage is provided for municipal code compliance matters and fees including, but not limited to, utilities, water or sewer services, or fees for trees, weeds, grass, and snow or garbage removal, police boarding, vacant building registration and zoning. 8. Rights of parties in actual possession of all or any part of the premises. 9. Taxes due and payable in 2013 in the amount of $554.88, total. First half taxes: unpaid, Second half taxes: unpaid, Base tax $544.00, Penalty $13.60, Special assessments $0, Ag Homestead Property, Parcel No. 25-0232300. 10. Taxes due and payable in prior years are paid in full. 11. An updated assessment search is not yet available. There is a deferred assessment; see B -I, No. 6, herein. 12. Limitation of access to Trunk Highway 212 as described in Quit Claim Deed dated March 8, 2002, filed March 14, 2002, as Document No. 310751, and as shown on the Survey by Pioneer Engineering, P.A. dated November 30, 2012. COMMITMENT NUMBER 40852-12-11653 SCHEDULE B - SECTION II EXCEPTIONS (Continued) 13. Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated June 2, 2006, filed July 27, 2006, as Document No. 446434. 14. Terms and conditions of Access Driveway Permit dated August 26, 2002. 15. Deleted by Title Company. 16. Deleted by Title Company. 17. Deleted by Title Company. 18. Terms and conditions of that certain Option Agreement by and between B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC and U.S. Home Corporation, dated November 16, 2012 , as evidenced by the Memorandum of Option Agreement dated November 16, 2013 and filed December 3, 2012 as Document No. 566887 in the Office of the County Recorder. 19. Lack of legal right of access to and from the Land. 20. Subject to the overhead utility lines along the northerly and easterly boundaries, as shown on the Survey by Pioneer Engineering, P.A., dated November 30, 2012. 21. Subject to any ownership interests created by the fences along the easterly (northeasterly, easterly, and southeasterly) boundaries, as shown on the Survey by Pioneer Engineering, P.A. dated November 30, 2012. Ownership of the fences is unknown. Note: A quit claim deed from the property owner to the north, with an encroaching fence along the northerly boundary, was recorded as Document No. 326002. 22. The Survey by Pioneer Engineering, P.A., dated November 30, 2012, indicates that the driveway and a concrete area on the southeasterly portion of the Land extend onto property owned by the State of Minnesota, not insured herein. The continuted use of benefit of the driveway and the concrete area is not hereby insured. THE FOLLOWING IS INCLUDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES AND WILL NOT APPEAR ON ANY FINAL POLICIES ISSUED: a. To schedule a closing, please contact our Scheduling Department at 952-943-1620. b. For questions regarding this commitment, please contact Cathy Busch at cbusch@nat.com C. Commitment revised : Schedule A, Legal Description: Revised to add reference to Bluff Creek and County Schedule B -II, No. 18: Added d. Commitment revised December 26, 2012: Schedule A (cont.): Date revised in last line of legal description COMMITMENT NUMBER 40852-12-11653 SCHEDULE B - SECTION II EXCEPTIONS (Continued) e. Commitment revised January 17, 2013: Schedule A (Cont.): Revised based on Survey dated November 30, 2012 Section B -I, Nos. 1, 2, and 3: Revised (allowing partial release) Schedule B-1, Nos. 4, 7, and 9: Deleted Schedule B -I, Nos. 8 and 11: Revised Schedule B -I, Nos. 13 and 14: Added Schedule B -II, Nos. 9, 12, and 18: Revised Schedule B -Il, Nos. 15, 16, and 17: Deleted Schedule B -ll, Nots 19, 20, 21, and 22: Added Commitment revised June 10, 2013: Schedule A, Nos. 1 and 2(a): Revised Schedule B -I, No. 3: Revised Schedule B -I, Nos. 15, 16, and 17: Added Schedule B -II, Nos. 9, 18, and 21: Revised Schedule A Continued: Revised (in last exception "78.21 feet" corrected to 78.12 feet") g. Commitment revised July 12,2013: Schedule A, No. 1: Revised Schedule B -I, No. 17: Revised Schedule B -ll, Nos. 9 and 11: Revised - END OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION II - ALTA Commitment Schedule B - Section It (06/17/06) S24MOTC3670 Rev. Il3/11 (40852-12-11653.PFD/40852-12-11653/91) ISSUED BY NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY AS AGENT FOR NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NUMBER: 40852-12-11653 SCHEDULE A CONTINUED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest comer of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Section Line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest comer of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest comer of said Section and Place of beginning. Being a three -cornered piece in Southwest comer of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Except All that part of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter which lies easterly of the following described Line 1, Line 1. Commencing at the north quarter comer of said Section 26; thence run west on an assumed azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section 1634.23 feet to the point of beginning; thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 478.28 feet; thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. And except All that part of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter which lies southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest comer of said Section 26, thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 26 minutes 15 seconds East along the west line of said Section 26, 437.06 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 11 degrees 18 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of 227.32 feet; thence South 31 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 78.12 feet; thence South 72 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 194.18 feet-, thence North 85 degrees 58 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 70.04 feet; thence North 64 degrees 20 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 84.06 feet; thence North 57 degrees 33 minutes 52 seconds East a distance of 137.57 feet; thence North 43 degrees 22 minutes 10 seconds East a distance of 24.36 feet; thence North 74 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 85.70 feet; thence South 86 degrees 59 minutes 14 seconds East a distance of 56.17 feet; thence South 23 degrees 40 minutes 27 seconds East a distance of 78.42 feet; thence South 41 degrees 00 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 59.98 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 21.64 feet; thence South 40 degrees 27 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 78.87 feet; thence South 51 degrees 58 minutes 38 seconds East a distance of 97.43 feet; thence South 23 degrees 40 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 133.38 feet; thence South 33 degrees 41 minutes 43 seconds East a distance of 28.38 feet; thence South 34 degrees 59 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 80.50 feet; to the intersection with the above described Line 1 and there terminating. ALTA Commitment Schedule C 524MNOTC.3671 Rev.06116M (40652-12-11653.PFDI40852-12-11653191) PreferredOne Employer Medical Questionnaire The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information on potential claims utilization. This information, along with historical claims utilization, will be used to determine the appropriate rate level. Your assistance in providing this information is appreciated. Employer: Completed by: Date: 1. Please provide the following information for any disabled employees or dependents covered by your group health plan, either currently or within the past year. (Also indicate if the condition is being covered by Worker's Comp.) Date of Disability Diagnosis, Prognosis, & Treatment 2. If any employee or dependent covered by your group health plan is currently hospitalized, or has been hospitalized within the past year, please provide the following information. Age & Sex Admission Date Estimated Cost Diagnosis, Prognosis & Treatment 3. If any employee or dependent has, within the past 2 years, incurred claims in excess of $15,000, please provide the following information. Diagnosis, Prognosis & Treatment Approx. Cost 4. Are you aware of any of the following health conditions for any employee or dependent that is covered by your group health plan? Has had, or is waiting for, a transplant Newborn with any major health problems Cancer in the last 5 years Accident (i.e., paralysis, comatose) Any other serious medical condition (i.e., heart, circulatory, diabetes, AIDS, etc.) If yes to any of the above, please give the date of origin, actual diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. EMPLOYER CERTIFICATION As the named employer, we understand and agree that the information we have provided herein shall be relied upon by the quoting company to determine the appropriate rate level, and, if such information is materially incomplete or incorrect, the rates will be subject to an adjustment by the quoting company during the first contract year by giving us a 30 -day advance notice of such adjustment. Employer Title Date JEURISSEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT&' Not B. Eimer Family Farms, LLC. a Minnesota limited Noblity cowpony, fee owns,, of the fallowing described property situated in the County of Cara. State of Mutuaota, to wit: The Northwest Quarter of the N,thwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 115. Ron, 23 (re/emed Ia herein as True A). ALSO: Commanding; of the Southwest comer of Sectian 23, Tamship 116, Range 23; thence running North an Section Lime W feet; thence in a straight line to a Paint on the South 6eation Ise of said Sector, 30 feet East of the Sou"n"t comer of said Sectian; thence teerl W feet to sold Southwest corner of said Section and place of beginning. Being a three—comered piece in Southendt corner o1 deal Section 23. Township 116, Range 23, AL50'. Beginning at the Southeast comer of the Northwest Worter of the Northwest Cuarter of Section 26, Township 116, North of Range 23 Wel; Mance main slay the War1tt—Worter sectbn line o distance of 800 feel to Lara County Road No. 14; thence dost along the north line of mid Carver County Read No. 14 a distance of 26 kat; thence north pamile to the a/oramentianed quarter—quarter section 827 feet to a point 25 feet north of the coat—west quarter—quarter motion line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26, thence West o distance of 25 feet to the quarter—quarts, section line; thence south a elstance of 26 feet to place of beginning (referred to herein oe Tract B). EXCEPT; that part of Tract A which lies Eostedy of LINE 1 described bet. LINE 1 Commencing at the north quarter comer of said Section 26; Terence run west an an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 records along the north line of said section 1634.23 feet to the paint of beginning, of Line 1 b be descrided: thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 mnutes 41 seconds for 366 71 feet; thence an an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seeands 1s, 478.28 feet; thence m on azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 demons for 201.73 feet; thence m m azimuth of 218 degrees OB minutes 53 secands fm 606.64 feet to a point m the south line of sok Northwest Quarter o1 the Northwest Warier and there terminating, and EXCEPT that part of Tract B which fie Northwesterly and Southwesterly of LINE 2 desoriiled below: LINE 2. Commence, of the point at termination of Line 1 desolbed above; thence On east on an azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 mcmds along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 556.16 fest to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees GO minutes 59 seconds for 448.73 feet; thence on on azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 feet; thence on an azimuth of 105 degrees OB minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet; thence m on ozhnuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 second. for 510.00 feet and there terminating, Hos caused the mate to be surveyed and platled m XURISSEN RIDGE and does hereby denote and dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements as shown an this plot for drainage and utility purposes only In witness whereof deal B. Elmer Family Forms, LLC, o Mnnemto I'mited Iiab9ity company, has coursed these presents to be signed by its proper olfcer this _ day of 20 B. Elms, Family Farms, LLC as STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me the day of 20_ , by a of B. Elmer Fomly Farms. LLC. a Mimouta limited liobnity company, an behalf of mal company Notary Public, _ My Commission, Eyires County. Minneedta RIDGE SURVEYOR'S CERnFICATE 1 hereby certify that I haw surroysd and platted the property descrioei on this plot an JEURISSEN RIDGE, that this plat is a correct reprexntolion of the hountlary survey, that all mathematical data and lobes are correctly designated m the plat; that ail monuments depicted on the pot how been w will be come.uy sol within one year as indicated an the plot; that all water boundaries and at londs as claimed n MS 505.0,, Subd, 3, existing ad of the dote of this certlrufatim are ahem and labeled an the plot; and that all public ways are shown and lobeed an the plat. Peter J. Hawkinson, Registered Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 422W STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate by Peter J, Hawkinson, Minnesota License No. 42299. was acknowledged before me this day of 20_. Notary PubliO, County, Minnesota My Commission Expim CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA This plat of JEURISSEN RIDGE was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Chonhassern, Minnesota at . regular meeting thereof held this day, of 20_ , and is In compianre with Me provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. NI mmummt, will be sal m day of 20_ , specified by the City CWncl and os stated on this plat according to Minnesota Statute Chapter 505. CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA By Mayor By Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR, Caryar County, Minnesota Pursuant to Chapter 395. Minnesota Laws of 1971, this pot has been Wpromed this day of 20 . Jcnn E. presents, Carver County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER, Grwr County, Airmen wto I hereby certify that loxes payable in. and prior years home been paid for land desoribed an this plot. Doled this day of 20 Laurie Darie, Canty Auditor/Treomar COUNTY RECORDER Carysr County, Minnasoto I hereby ratify that this plat of JEURISSEN RIDGE was flied this _ day of 20 . al .'clack M. as Document No Mork Lundgren. County Recander PI9NEERmeneenng 3DW KST UNE CF 1X11 5,I 1/4 C3 J-- s¢c. v. TW. 115,Rff. n SW WK (GRKR W, Wa ENT) SER "cRIP I �.. '11:111NI T. SOOtY'S9`E 478.32 I3. 1759rm' 41828 `,. EAST UNE C! TnE Mw I/4 Of MF HW 1/, Of SEC. 3E OUTLOT A EMSV'14i xl> NI W W MM 1/4 C4 mw) JEURISSEN RIDGE C.R. DOC. NO. l� r 1 ;..1 DETAIL SO0408•S9'E 74238 I ` YEAS. T821.P' DEED " N LINE X C/.flNR YflW mM. Na 14 Y aMTER-WAFTER yC. LINE---- — 1 `II SOOVCSY'E •Ecom DEEc 704.91,10 I IF PH o'E' _ 4� , '�• yip 'd - SITE }s OUTLOT Ba SECTION 26, TVR. 116, RGE. 23 wA:' ANo ,IT'�r LOCA oRuTfON REAP EAS .- cxA u. 6 \ I eiK ze a NM SCAIE fit' se�RX� E 1 y>LN \\ R I EXCEPIIN Z O�Qe• A ! ,•,•� `\ F $ O Tom. Ilfi. Rr£ET � ' y \ to \\ OUTLOT C BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF BEC7 C'+ 23. TOWNSHIP 116. RANGE 23, MHICH IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 88V3'46• EAST. :/ / 9 y\ NO MONUMENT SYMBOL SHOWN AT ANY STATUTE - REQUIRED - LOCATION, INDICATES A PLAT MONUMENT THAT WILL BE SET AND WHICH SHALL BE IN PLACE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE FILING OF THE PLAT. SAID 13n93 MONUMENTS SHALL BE 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENTS MARKED BY LICENSE NUMBER 42299. J,� p • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT. / IV,vl-1, I I / PASS / 2i:u 1 1 —+— DENOTES RESTRICTED RIGHT OF ACCESS PER A ---2N MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT of TRAN9PORTAP.CN / 1 I RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO, 10-20. PMNEERenenemng JEURISSEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; That B. Elmer Family Farm., LLC. o Minnesota limited liability company, fee mance, of Me following described property eRaated n the County of Carry. State of Minnesota, to wit The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Ouarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23 (referred to heron as Tract A). ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest tamer of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Section Line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to o point on Me South Section line of said Section. W feet East of Me Southwest corner of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest earner of said Section and piece of beginning. Being a Mree—Garnered piece n Southwest comer of acid Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, ALSO: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, North of Range 23 West; thence south along Me quarter—quarter section fine a distance o1 600 fat to Cerro County Rood No. 14; thence east long the north line o1 sad Carver County Road No. 14 a distoree of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the aforementioned quarter -quarter section 627 het to a point 25 feel north of the east—west quarter—quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26, thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter—quarter section Ione; thence south o distances of 26 feet to place of beginning (felemeci to herein 0. Tinct B). EXCEPT: that part M Tract A which Iners Easterly of UNE 1 descried below UNE 1. Commerncng at the north quarter comer of toad Section 26; thence nun wet do an azimuth of 271 answer 56 minutes 13 seconds along Me north line of said section 1634.23 feet to the point or beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on on azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds far 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth or 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds far 47526 test; themes on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds far 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 216 degrees OB minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a point an the south line of said Northwest Cuarler of Me Northwest Qlofler and there terminating; and EXCEPT that part of Tract B which Hes Northwesterly and Southwesterly of UNE 2 described Dela,. LINE 2. Commencing at the point of termnatlan of Line 1 described abm; Mende run wast on an azbnuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes H seconds along the touM line of the North half of the Northwest Quorter of said Section 556.16 feet to Me point of beginning of Line 2 to he described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees W minutes 59 second. 1« 44BJ3 feet; thence an an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds lar 323.97 feet' thence onnazimuth of 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feel; thence an an azimuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as JEURISSEN RIDGE and does hereby dandle and dedicate to the public far public use forever the easements as shown on this plot for drainage and utility purposes aNy. In witness whereof said S. Elmer Fainly Forms, U.C. a Minnesota limited Ipbllity cernpany, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _ day of 20 B. Eimer Family Farrow, LLC as STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknavdedgea before me thio day 0, , 20_ , by as of B. Elmer Family Forms. LLC, a Minnesota limited hallo y company, on behalf of said company. Notary Public. _ My Cementation Espies County, Minnesota RIDGE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that I hire surveyed and plotted the properly dearIed on this plat as .EURISSEN RIME. that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels she correctly designated an the play that oil monuments depicted an the plot hove been or win be correctly set within ax yam es indicated an the plat: that all water boundaries and wet lands as defined in MS 505.01. Subd. 3, enistin9 as of Me date of this certitkation one shown and labeled on Me plat; and that ail public wogs ore shown and labeled on the plat. Peter J. Hawkinson, Registered Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 42299 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surwycrs Certificate by Peter J. Hawranson, MlnneaoM License No. 42299, was arknotledged before me the day of 20_ . Notary public. My Commission Ezpim CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA County Minnewto This plot of JEURISSEN RIDGE was approved and accepted by the Cty Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota of o regula. meeting thereof held this day of 20_ , and is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdirislan 2. All monuments will be set as day of , 20_ , specified by the City Council and as stated on this plat according to Minnesoto Statutes Chapter 505. CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY BE CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA Mayor By. Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR, Craver County, Minnesota Pursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Lan of 1971, this plat hos been approved this day at 20 By John E. Freemyer Corwr County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/7REASURER, Caner County, Minnesota I hereby cwrtily that tares payable in and prior years now been paid for land described on this plot Doled this day of 20 . Latin. Cover. County AudRor/Trinxi COUNTY RECORDER, Caner county, Minnesota I hereby certify Mat this plat of JEURISSEN RIDGE was filed this _ day of 20 , at _ o'clock M. as Document No. By Mork Lundgren, County Recorder PISNEERmonaning �rrT I I I cwwrzc ►3-13 r Office (952) 8532473 CHADWICK GROUP, INC. Fax 1.8666734-3621 4477 ntanimu aoxt Lwdsior, MN 55331 June 18, 2013 To: Planning Commission, City of Chanhassen City Council, City of Chanhassen Fr: John Chadwick on behalf of Mr. Bruce Jeurissen, B. Elmer Farms, LLC,,.o J r,6 RE: Bruce Jeurissen Farm- Camden Ridge (//� The purpose of this letter is to offer additional input and information in written form to be considered by planning commission and city council. This project has been a long time in coming and it would have been sold long ago and the assessments paid had the sale in 2006 gone through. Recently the City Council directed City staff to pull together some information a few months ago. I am not certain if that made it to final form and was distributed. The City staff has been working hard on all of these items but it has -not been without a few major difficulties along the way. Mr. Jeurissen is generally in favor of the project and wants to see this action proceed in a fair and equitable manner. Access and Assessments I ) The property was accessed from the south off of Pioneer Trail before Hwy 212 was built. Exhibit I a and lb from MNDOT (attached) shows the frontage road that was to be built to replace the driveway access. The frontage road was to service both the portion of the farm north and the portion of the farm south of the creek. It was never built. MNDOT elevated Highway 212y rather than building it at grade, after the acquisition of the land from Bruce, which meant the current driveway has never ,.closed". It still exists under the 212 bridges. If 212 was built according to plan, then it would have closed the driveway and the frontage road would had to have been built. 2) MNDOT in its acquisition from the property owner to the west, did acquire land necessary to provide access as MNDOT owns land with frontage on Pioneer Pass to the west all the way east to the Southwest comer of the south part of the Jeurissen farm. 3) The MNDOT taking "addendum to offer to sell' item 14 clearly calls out for replacement of the driveway by a MNDOT or a governmental unit and not by the landowner. See exhibit 2. The MNDOT sale went through in 2002. 4) A contract between Jeurissen and Town and Country Homes was entered into stating landowner was to be paid for land used in the development including paying for land that supported the "transfer of density". Exhibit 3 is a letter from Mr. Robert Generous to Mr. Kevin Clark of Town and Country Homes clearly states that "transfer of density" was not used. The development that was approved in 2006 called for 146+- units North of the Creek and zero South. A lawsuit between seller and land, 1xndink. Fame SCANNED r Town and Country ensued. The deed to property was placed in escrow, and never transferred to Town and Country. Ultimately the sale was killed as Town and Country as a result of Exhibit 3, felt they did not have to pay for any land south of the Creek, however that land was to he dedicated to the City for park/open space. During the court proceedings it was determined that there was 8.09 acres of land usable South of the Creek. 5) Since there is 8.09 acres of usable land South of the Creek, and no transfer of density was used before, or in this action for 58+_ units, there is still considerable land value in the South. 6) The City process has assessed the farm based on 30 acres out of a gross acreage of 36 acres. Only 22 acres are north of the creek, again that would support the notion that 8 acres to the South of the creek would have or must have benefit of the Bluff Creek Boulevard assessment. If the actions taken were to deem the south as not usable, how can there be an assessment? 7) While Town and Country did sign up for the Bluff Creek Boulevard assessment, they did not have title to the property due to the lawsuit. The deed was held in escrow. 8) The City asked Town and Country sign up for the assessment, at a time when they did not own the parcel and there was no access to Bluff Creek Boulevard. How is it that the land is asked to pay interest on Bluff Creek Boulevard and yet it could not and still cannot use the road that they were paying for? 9) How is it that as of June, 2013 there is still no access to that improvement? It is requested that with no access, there should be no interest paid on this assessment. Access was a condition of approval for Ryland/now Degler in 2006, yet it was not enforced/required at that time. When the next phase for Degler was approved, the access easement could have been enforced/required, but it was not. It is now being forced as a private matter. When the adjacent Peterson property was developed, the land was deeded to the City on a timely basis to allow the access to occur. (The access crosses Degler and the former Peterson farm to reach Jeurissen) Land to be provided for open space I ) The City is requesting landowner to provide land south of the creek for the open space for this development. It will leave the landowner with just five acres remaining south of the creek. Any such land transferred will require an easement across this provided land so that the retained parcel will have continued access to driveway to the south. Landowner has been working with MNDOT to rectify this issue for over one year. There is no resolution as of this date. As of June 13. 2013 it was communicated verbally that the issue was being transferred out of the Ombudsman's office and over to MNDOT Metro Right of Way Division. Once suitable alternate access is provided to the retained parcel, this right of access (easement) can be eliminated. 2) Additionally, since there are eight acres per the court case, and landowner is only able to retain five acres south of the creek, it is requested that there be no further open space requirements/dedications/takings when the land is later developed. Conclusions- to be recommended to City Council by Planning Commission I ) Assessments on five acres retained will stay on the five acres and will be paid when there is benefit provided by the assessment. The fact that assessments are being paid on three acres of the south parcel and yet being provided to the City is interesting in and of itself. 2) Interest on the remaining assessment shall be waived since there is no access. Interest would start to accrue on the day there is access. Several hundred thousand dollars of assessments for other projects have already been paid on behalf of this property and no benefit has been received to date. This would he a middle ground. 3) Assessments on land provided to City, shall be transferred to City with assessments intact, and not paid by landowner who is providing the land. 4) There shall be no additional open space requirements for the retained parcel. 5) An easement over Outlot B to the retained parcel shall be put in place and remain until resolution with MNDOT. List of Exhibits la MNDOT MAP (red) lb MNDOT Map (segment 2) 2 Addendum of offer to sell (see item 14) 3 Mr. Generous letter to Mr. Clark Comments on the staff report to Planning Commission for review lune 18 2013 P6 of 31 paragraph 2. There is a reference to "under the TH 212 bridge". This is not correct. In 2002 when executed. there was no 1-1-1212 bridge contemplated. TH 212 was to be built at grade and not elevated. Without a bridge, the passage under could not physically be possible. P6 of 31 paragraph 3 "Town and County Homes had title". The title was in escrow, they were to have made payments June 2, 2006 and ten days after. The second payment was not made and the deed went into escrow P6 of 31 paragraph 5 "Homes as title ownee'. See above. As a result of the lawsuit and the settlement thereof. all rights and obligations of Town and Country, were transferred back to Mr. Jeurissen in exchange for certain actions on behalf of Mr. Jeurissen. P7 of 31 paragraph 4 and P 18 of 31 paragraph? Assessments for Bluff Creek Blvd Improvements. It states the amount due * $667,834.02 as of 12'31/2012 and on page 18 states as of June 6. 2013 the assessment amount due was $796.302.31 At 6% interest for '/2 year the 667.834.02 only grows to $687.869.04. There is an arithmetic issue here to be resolved. P7 of 19 paragraph. It states "In order to complete a link to Pioneer Trail" This is something that needs to be negotiated. Perhaps a non-exclusive right of use at the discretion of land owner. Once the MNDOT access issues to the south are resolved. further discussion would be in order. P27 of 31 paragraph 1 Item 1."developer must obtain right of way" This has caused considerable delay. price reductions and interest cost for the project as noted earlier. P28 of 31 paragraph 1 Item 15 "driveway access closed" No. this must wait until MNDOT issues are resolved. We have tried for a year, but have not one thing in writing back from MNDOT as of 6/13/2013. P28 of 31 paragraph 6 Item 20 "or reassessed" This would be to Outlot B (donated or dedicated) parcel and to the retained parcel Outlot C. P29 of 31 paragraph 9 Item 4 "shall provide" This will be done at time of development, not at this time P30 of 31 paragraph I Item 5 "intended use....'. Property owner must retain an casement across Outlot B to service the property and will release that easement once suitable access or resolution is provided by MNDOT. It will be used for farming at this time. JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION AREA SKETCH 100 50 0 100 SCALE IN FEET PIZNEERengineering CTV ENGLNEERS LA DML NES LA DSUR ORS LA CAP CMTE= AREA TOTAL OUTLOT AREA = TOTAL AREA = 154,572 11 SUMMARY 154,572 SF. (35.5733 AC.) SF. (35.5733 AC.) 1 PIZNEERengineering CTV ENGLNEERS LA DML NES LA DSUR ORS LA CAP CMTE= CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION II ' Application of U.S. Home Corporation and B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC — Camden Ridge 13-13 On June 18, 2013, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of U.S. Home Corporation and B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC for a Planned Unit Development which includes the Rezoning of the property from Agricultural Estate District to Planned Unit Development — Residential, Subdivision into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, public right-of-way and outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A-2. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Medium Density. 3. The legal description of the property is shown in the attached Exhibit A. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. SCANNED f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven () effects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city s comprehensive plan; C. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stone water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant adverse environmental damage; f The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. Adequate infrastructure is in place or proposed with the development. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: (1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. (2) Lack of adequate roads. (3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. (4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 6. When approving a conditional use permit, the City must determine the capability of a proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the conditional use Section 20-232, include the following 12 items: a. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. The proposed development will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. c. The proposed development will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. 2 d. The proposed development will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed development will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fine protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. £ The proposed development will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. It. The proposed development will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. The proposed development will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed development will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. The proposed development will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Articles IV, V and VI of the Chanhassen City Code. The planning report #2013-13 dated June 18, 2013, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 18a' day of June, 2013. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman EXHIBIT A The Northwest Ouarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23 (referred to herein as Tract A) ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest caner of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Section Use 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest coma of said Section; thence West 30 feet to sold Southwest corner of said Section and place of beginning. Being a three—cornered plece In Southwest caner of sold Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, ALSO: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Ouster of Section 26, Township 116, Nath of Range 23 West; thence south along the qualer—quarter sectlon line a distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14; thence east along the north line of said Corea County Road No 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north Parallel to the aforementioned quarter—Warta section 827 feet to a point 26 feet north of the east—rest quarter—quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of sold Section 26, thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter—quanta section line; thence south a distance of 26 het to place of beginning (referred to herein as Tract B). EXCEPT: that part of Tract A which Iles Easterly of LINE 1 described below: LINE 1. Commencing at the north quater corner of said Section 26; thence run west on an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section 1634.23 feet to the pont of beginning of Use 1 to be described; thence an an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet: thence an an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 478.28 feet; thence an an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds far 606.64 feet to a point on the south Ina of mid Northwest Ouarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating; and EXCEPT that part of Tract B which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of LINE 2 clescribed below: LINE 2. Commencing at the point of termination of Una 1 described above; thence run east an an azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 secmcis along the south line of the Nath half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Use 2 to be described; thence an an azimuth of 218 degrees DO minutes 59 seconds for 448.73 feet; thence an an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 sands far 323.97 fest; thence an an azimuth of 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds far 351.75 feet; thence an an azinuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 seconds far 510.00 feet and there terminating; Together with right of access retained In Quit Clain Deed Document No. 310751 pursuant to Access Drlvwway Permit dated August 26, 2012. 4 MY OF CWSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952227.1160 Fax: 952.2271170 Flip Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.2271110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.2271110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.2271110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us July 25, 2013 Mr. Joe Jablonski Lennar 16305 36a' Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55446 Re: Camden Ridge, Planning Case #2013-13 Dear Mr. Jablonski: This letter is to confirm that on July 22, 2013, the Chanhassen City Council approved: A. Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A-2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R) for Camden Ridge; B. Preliminary plat of approximately 23 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots and 7 outlots subject to the following conditions: Building Conditions: 1. Demolition permits are required for the removal of any existing structures. 2. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 4. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 5. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 6. The applicant and/or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. 7. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Emdneering Conditions: 1. The developer must obtain right-of-way for the part of River Rock Road that connects to Bluff Creek Boulevard. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED Mr. Joe Jablonski July 25, 2013 Page 2 2. The proposed "Easement Detail" must be revised to include how the easements around the perimeter of the twinhome lots will be platted. 3. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail near Outlot F so that it will meet ADA standards. 4. The contours near the northwest comer of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7 must be smoothed out. 5. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) between lots on the north side of Street B to show the grading will allow water to drain away from the structures. 6. The final plans must note the survey benchmark on the plan set. 7. The final plans must note the existing and proposed elevations at the corners of each lot. 8. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. 9. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 10. Retaining Wall B must be moved so that it is outside the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. 11. A Homeowners Association must be created to take ownership of all retaining walls and the draintile along the face of Retaining Wall B. 12. Local streets must be within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way. 13. At final plat, the Engineering Department will review the profile of Street A between stations 2+00 and 4+00 to ensure the profile meets the *minimum length requirements for vertical curves. 14. The proposed centerline grade at the intersection of River Rock Drive and Street A must not be greater than 3%. 15. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed except for access for agricultural purposes only on Outlot C, Jeurissen I" Addition. An access easement across Outlot B, Jeurissen 1 a Addition, shall be recorded which shall follow the existing driveway alignment with a width of approximately 26 feet. Said easement shall be vacated should alternate access to Outlot C, Jeurissen I" Addition become available. 16. The developer's engineer must design a Street C typical section. Mr. Joe Jablonski July 25, 2013 Page 3 17. The development is adjacent to Bluff Creek Boulevard and is therefore subject to the arterial collector fee at the time of final plat for Camden Ridge. The fee shall be $55,030.56 ($2,400 x 22.9294 acres of Outlot A, Jeurissen I" Addition). 18. The developer's engineer must incorporate pressure -reducing valves and a surge protection system into the watermain plans. 19. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBMH-102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. 20. Unless the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements assessment, City Project 06-05, levied against the property described on Exhibit "A" is paid in full before the plat is recorded the assessment is reapportioned against Outlot A (Jeurissen Ridge). As of June 6, 2013, the assessment amount with accrued interest was $796,302.31. 21. Water and sewer hook-up fees must be paid at the time of final plat. 22. Preserving 60 feet of right-of-way to the property straight north of Camden Ridge. Fire Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. Temporary street signs must be installed prior to home construction. 3. No burning permits will be issued. Any trees removed must either be chipped on site or removed from site. 4. Water mains shall be made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Posts, fences, utility boxes etc. shall not be placed near fire hydrants which would hinder firefighters to quickly locate and/or operate fire hydrants in a safe manner. Natural Resources Conditions: 1. The applicant shall increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. 2. The applicant shall plant a minimum of 130 trees in the development. 3. The applicant shall diversify the plant schedule so that no one species comprises more than one third of the total number of trees. 4. The applicant shall specify vegetation proposed for Outlots A, B and C. 5. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to the city prior to final approval. Mr. Joe Jablonski July 25, 2013 Page 4 6. The applicant shall preserve trees #1301, 1302, 1303. These trees along with trees #1393- 1398 shall be protected by fencing prior to and during any grading or construction activities. 7. The developer shall install signage at lot lines to demarcate the Bluff Creek Primary Zone. Parks Conditions: 1. Full park dedication fees shall be collected per city ordinance in lieu of requiring parkland dedication. 2. Construction of Bluff Creek Trail from its current southerly terminus, extending between the new homes and Bluff Creek to a terminus point at TH 212. The developer shall provide design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the `Bluff Creek Trail." All construction documents, including material costs, shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be 10 feet in width, surfaced with asphalt and constructed to meet all city specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for the cost of the aggregate base, asphalt surfacing, and storm water systems utilized to construct the trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials noted. Labor and installation, design, engineering and testing services are not reimbursable expenses. Planning Conditions: The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as its portion of the 2005 AUAR prior to recording the final plat. 2. The developer shall prepare a noise analysis for noise generated by traffic on Highway 212. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which shall be implemented by the developer. 3. The Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone, Outlot `B", shall be conveyed to the City by warranty deed free and clear of any encumbrances or a preservation easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the plat is recorded. 4. Before any development plans are submitted for Outlot C, the property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, Jeurissen I" Addition. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Development of Outlot C Jeurissen I" Addition would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternate Urban Areawide Review, AUAR. Any development would need to conduct Mr. Joe Jablonski July 25, 2013 Page 5 additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR. 5. The property owner must advise the city of the intended use of Outlot C, Jeurissen I" Addition, and how it shall be accessed. This Outlot may not be developable or accessible in the future. 6. Final plat approval will be contingent on the developer resolving the access issue. Either an access easement or right-of-way must be in place prior to any site development. Individual lots may not exceed the maximum hard cover per lot established in the compliance table. Water Resources Conditions: Land disturbance within the first twenty feet of the Bluff Creek Overlay District setback shall not be allowed unless the applicant can demonstrate that the goal cannot be achieved without the proposed disturbance. 2. A mitigation/restoration plan must be provided for any disturbance within the Bluff Creek Overlay District or setback from the BOOR. 3. Trail must be aligned to minimize the encroachment into the BCOR primary zone and minimize loss of natural vegetation and habitat. 4. Efforts must be made to minimize the number of inlets into each pond. 5. The proposed ponds must be designed with a forebay. 6. The plans must demonstrate how water quality basin #1 and water quality basin #3 will be accessed. This includes all inlets, outlets and filtration benches as well as sediment removal from forebay and water quality volume. 7. The stormwater design shall, to the greatest extent practicable, seek to maximize infiltration, extend detention times and protect Bluff Creek from scour and other erosive conditions. 8. The applicant must evaluate downstream flow conditions as indicated in Section 19-144. 9. A Surface Water Pollution Plan and all required elements must be provided to the city for review. This plan must be compliant with NPDES requirements as well as the requirements of Chapter 19 of city code. 10. SWMP trunk fees due at final plat are estimated to be $104,930.25. 11. The development must comply with the MN Rules chapter 6120 and the DNR must issue their concurrence to this effect. Mr. Joe Jablonski July 25, 2013 Page 6 12. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. Grading activities have been observed within this area along the south side of Bluff Creek. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Any such areas that have been disturbed through the removal or addition of soils material prior to approval shall be addressed prior to commencement of other grading activities but no later than seven (7) days from approval. C. Conditional Use Permit to allow for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District for the Camden Ridge development; And, D. Development Contract for grading of Camden Ridge subject to the following conditions: 1. If the Preserve at Bluff Creek 5'h Addition final plat is not recorded, the developer for Camden Ridge must acquire the right-of-way for River Rock Drive South to connect to Bluff Creek Boulevard. 2. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail near Outlot F. 3. The contours near the northwest corner of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7 must be smoothed out. 4. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) between lots on the north side of Street B to show the grading will allow water to drain away from the structures. 5. An escrow totaling $105,376.87 (110% of the estimated erosion control for this development) is required before site grading begins. 6. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. 7. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 8. Retaining Wall B must be moved so that it is outside the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. 9. An escrow totaling $66,709.50 (110% of the estimated cost of retaining wall construction) is required before work on the retaining walls begins. Mr. Joe Jablonski July 25, 2013 Page 7 Final plat documents must be submitted to the City 30 days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Conditions of the preliminary plat approval must be addressed for final plat approval. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. The executed development shall be submitted to the City along with the escrow totaling $172,086.37. The City will submit all the necessary documents to Carver County for recording. Permanent access to Outlot A, Jeurissen Ridge must be in place prior to any development activity. Once everything is submitted, please contact Gordy Stauff at 952-227-1166 to coordinate the preconstruction meeting. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or by email at beenerousna.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official c: Bruce Jeurissen 9:lplan12013 planning cases\2013-13 camden ridge\appmval letter camden ridge prehinA c ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8Yz" x 11"), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29-06 gAeng\forms\final plat submittal.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA CAMDEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR GRADING PURPOSES CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT CAMDEN RIDGE AGREEMENT dated JULY 22, 2013 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and, US HOME CORPORATION D/B/A LENNAR, (the "Developer"). 1. Development Plans. The plan shall be developed in accordance with the following plan: grading plan approved JULY 22, 2013, prepared by Pioneer Engineering. 4. Security. To guarantee compliance with the plan the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank acceptable to the City, or cash escrow ("security") for $172,089.37. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract. If the security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. 5. Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: US HOME CORPORATION D/B/A LENNAR ATTN: JOE JABLONSKI 16305 36'm AVE, SUITE 600 PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 Phone: 952-249-3014 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Telephone: (952) 227-1100 I 6. Other Special Conditions. A. Dedicated access to Outlot A must be provided. B. If the Preserve at Bluff Creek P Addition final plat is not recorded, before the final plat for Camden Ridge is approved, the developer for Camden Ridge must acquire the right of way for River Rock Drive South to connect to Bluff Creek Boulevard as a condition of final plat approval. C. The developer must continue to work with City staff to finalize the grading plan. D. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail near Outlot F. E. The contours near the northwest corner of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7, must be smoothed out. F. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) between lots on the north side of Street B to show the grading will allow water to drain away from the structures. G. An escrow totaling $105,376.87 (110% of the estimated erosion control for this development) is required for site grading. H. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. L Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. J. Retaining Wall B must be moved so that it is outside the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. K. An escrow totaling $66,709.50 (110% of the estimated cost of retaining wall construction) is required for work on the retaining walls. CITY OF CHANHASSEN M (SEAL) Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager US HOME CORPORATION D/B/A LENNAR: 1L.", STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Joe Jablonski The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2013, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2013, by Joe Jablonski of US Home Corporation D/B/A Lennar, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 EXHUBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Outlot A, Jeurissen I' Addition MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _ day of 20_. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 20_, by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _ day of 20_ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 .by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. _ Date: TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our hrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, 'Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2. of (Name of Bank) ; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2 This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in fiill our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 500. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. M Its Building Inspections Dear Mr. Jeurissen: Phone: 952.2271180 Fax: 952.227.1190 This letter is to confirm that on July 22, 2013, the Chanhassen City Council approved: Engineering Phone: 952.2271160 Jeurissen Ridge (formerly known as Jeurissen Ts' Addition) plat subject to the Fax: 952.227.1170 following conditions: Finance July 25, 2013 CITY OF Ridge plat. MUSEN Park Recreation Mr. Bruce Jeurissen 7700 Market Boulevard B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC PBox Chanhassen, MNN 55317 19450 281 n Street Belle Plaine, MN 56011-5010 Administration PFax:952.22271100 Re: Jeurissen Ridge (formerly known as Jeurissen I" Addition) Fax: 952.2271110 Planning Case 2013-13 g Building Inspections Dear Mr. Jeurissen: Phone: 952.2271180 Fax: 952.227.1190 This letter is to confirm that on July 22, 2013, the Chanhassen City Council approved: Engineering Phone: 952.2271160 Jeurissen Ridge (formerly known as Jeurissen Ts' Addition) plat subject to the Fax: 952.227.1170 following conditions: Finance 1. Dedicated access to Outlot A must be provided prior to recording the Jeurissen Phone: 952.227.1140 Ridge plat. Fax: 952.227.1110 Park Recreation 2. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed except for access for Phone:: 952.227.1 120 agricultural purposes only on Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge. An access easement Fax: 952.227.1110 across Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge shall be recorded which shall follow the existing driveway alignment with a width of approximately 26 feet. Said easement shall Recreation Center be vacated should alternate access to Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge become available. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 3. Unless the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvement assessment (City Project 06-05) Fax: 952.227.1404 lamed against the property is paid in full before the final plat is recorded, the Planning & assessment is reapportioned against Outlot A. The principal of $601,212.65 was Natural Resources deferred until development and it has been accruing 6% interest since 2009. As Phone: 952.227.1130 of June 6, 2013 the assessment amount due was $796,302.31. Fax: 952.2271110 4. The Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone, "Outlot B" shall be conveyed to Public works the City by warranty deed free and clear of any encumbrances, or a preservation Phone: 7e: Pant Place 952.2271300 easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the final Fax: 952.227.1310 plat is recorded. Senior Center 5. Before any development plans are submitted for Outlot C the property owner shall Phone: 952.227.1125 provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a Fax: 952.227.1110 topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for web site the City to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community tot Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Mr. Bruce Jeurissen July 25, 2013 Page 2 Jeurissen Ridge. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Development of Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). Any development would need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR. And the development contract for Jeurissen Ridge (formerly known as Jeurissen I" Addition). Two signed mylar copies of the final plat shall be submitted to our office for signatures. One 1 "=200' scale mylar reduction of the final plat and one 1 "=200' scale paper reduction of the final plat with just street names and lot and block numbers shall be submitted. The executed development shall be submitted to the City. In addition, a digital copy in .dxf format and a digital copy in .tif format (pdf compatible) in Carver County coordinates of the final plat shall be submitted. The City will submit all the necessary documents to Carver County for recording. Permanent access to Outlot A, Jeurissen Ridge must be in place prior to recording the final plat. A warranty deed for Outlot B or executed preservation easement shall be prepared and executed for recording with the final plat documents. Additionally, all current year taxes must be paid in full and any delinquent property taxes or green acres taxes must also be paid. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or by email at beenerousna.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely,, Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official c: Joe Jablonski, Lennar John Chadwick, Chadwick Group, Inc. g:\plan\2013 planning cmm\2013-13 camden ridgeNapproval leaffjauis en ridge.da; CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA JEURISSEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT JEURISSEN IST ADDMON AGREEMENT dated JULY 22, 2013 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and, B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for JEURISSEN Ridge (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, fiunish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the plat. 3. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plan: Final plat approved JULY 22, 2013, prepared by Pioneer Engineering. 4. Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC AT IN: BRUCE JEURISSEN 19450 281sT STREET BELLE PLAINS, MN 56011-5010 Phone: 952-873-6020 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Telephone (952) 227-1100 5. Other Special Conditions. A. Dedicated access to Outlot A must be provided prior to recording the plat. B. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed. This access may be used for agricultural purposes only on Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge. An access easement across Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge, shall be recorded which shall follow the existing driveway alignment with a width of approximately 26 feet. Said easement shall be vacated should alternate access to Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge become available. C. Unless the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements assessment, City Project 06-05, levied against the property described on Exhibit "A" is paid in full before the plat is recorded the assessment is reapportioned against Outlot A. As of June 6, 2013, the assessment amount with accrued interest was $796,302.31. D. The Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone, Outlot "B", shall be conveyed to the City by warranty deed free and clear of any encumbrances or a preservation easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the plat is recorded. E. Before any development plans are submitted for Outlot C the property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Development of Outlot C Jeurissen Ridge would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternate Urban Area wide Review, AUAR. Any development would need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN L", (SEAL) Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC: DW STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Bruce Jeurissen, Its The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2013, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2013, by Bruce Jeurissen, of B. Elmer Family Farms, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, on behalf of the company. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 3 NOTARY PUBLIC EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota (referred to herein as Tract A). ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Section Line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest comer of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest corner of said Section and place of beginning. Be a three-comered piece in Southwest corner of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, ALSO: Beginning at the Southeast comer of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, North of Range 23 West; thence south along the quarter -quarter section line a distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14; thence east along the north line of said Carver County Road No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the aforementioned quarter -quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26, thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter -quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of beginning (referred to herein as Tract B). EXCEPT: that part of Tract A which lies Easterly of LINE 1 described below: LINE 1. Commencing at the north quarter comer of said Section 26; thence run west on an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section 1634.23 feet to the point of beginning of Line I to be described; thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 478.28 feet; thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. and EXCEPT that part of Tract B which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of LINE 2 described below: LINE 2. Commencing at the point of termination of Line 1 described above; thence run east on an azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 seconds along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds for 448.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 feet; thence on an azimuth of 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet; thence on an azimuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating. Together with right of access retained in Quit Claim Deed Document No. 310751 pursuant to Access Driveway Permit dated August 26, 2012. MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of 20_ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_, by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _ day of 20_. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 20_, by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 ERREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. _ Date: TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2. of (Name of Bank) ; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 500. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. go Its CITY OF CflANBASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.22T11 10 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park 8 Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.2271110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site 5.16-1 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior !P)anner DATE: July 22, 2013 SUBJ: Camden Ridge — PUD -R, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit Planning Case #2013-13 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning, preliminary plat and conditional use permit for the Camden Ridge development subject to the conditions of the staff report and adoption of the Planning Commission Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting for Camden Ridge a Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A-2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of approximately 23 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 7 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Separately, City Council is approving the final plat for Jeurissen 0 Addition (which creates Outlot A for the Camden Ridge development), a development contract for Jeurissen I' Addition and a development contract to permit site grading of the Camden Ridge development area prior to final plat approval. The access to the development will be from the northwest. This roadway crosses two other parcels and, therefore, must be coordinated with the development of those sites. Site grading and final plat approval will be contingent on the developer resolving the access issue. The final plat for The Preserve 5'h Addition is scheduled for City Council approval on July 22, 2013. As part of that plat, the right-of-way for River Rock Drive South will be dedicated. The existing farm access from Pioneer Trail shall be retained by the property owner to access Outlot C, Jeurissen I' Addition for agricultural use only. The property owner, in consultation with the City, must determine if this land is developable and provide the environmental analysis to determine if the area is located within the Bluff Creek primary zone. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Development of Oudot C, Jeurissen I' Addition would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). Prior to any development of this area, the property owner would need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review, or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR. SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt Camden Ridge PUD -R, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit July 22, 2013 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 18, 2013. The Planning Commission voted six for and none against a motion recommending approval of the development. The Planning Commission had no issues or concerns with the proposed subdivision. They concurred that all development activity should be contingent on the acquisition or establishment of permanent public access to the site via River Rock Drive South. The property owner presented a letter to the Commission at the hearing (attached). The majority of the letter dealt with the owner's dealings with MnDOT and the assessments on the property. These items are not in the purview of the Planning Commission. Planning Commission minutes are item 1 a of the July 22, 2013 City Council packet. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the Camden Ridge development. ATTACHMENTS 1. Conditional Use Permit 2013-13. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated June 18, 2013. Memorandum from John Chadwick to Planning Commission and City Council dated June 18, 2013. g:\plan\2013 planning cases\2013-13 camden ridg6exminive sumnawyA c CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2013-13 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: For the Camden Ridge project to develop within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 2. Property. The permit is for the following -described property ("subject property") in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota: Outlots A and B, Jeurissen 1'` Addition 3. Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. The developer shall enter into a development contract for the property. b. The developer shall install signage at lot lines to demarcate the Bluff Creek Primary Zone. c. Land disturbance within the first twenty feet of the Bluff Creek Overlay District setback shall not be allowed unless the applicant can demonstrate that the goal cannot be achieved without the proposed disturbance. d. A mitigation/restoration plan must be provided for any disturbance within the Bluff Creek Overlay District or setback from the BCOR. e. The trail must be aligned to minimize the encroachment into the BCOR primary zone and minimize loss of natural vegetation and habitat. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: July 22, 2013 CITY OF CHAN14ASSEN M LO STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2013, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen P.O.Box 147 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning, subdivision and conditional use permit for the Camden Ridge development subject to the conditions of the staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting a Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 9 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. CAMDEN RIDGE LOCATION: 1500 Pioneer Trail (PH) 25-0232300) APPLICANT: Applicant: Lennar Attn: Joe Jablonski U.S. Home Corporation 16305 36`s Avenue North, Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 (952)249-3014 joe.jablonski@Lennar.com PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District, A-2 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Medium Density (4.0 — 8.0 units per net acre) ACREAGE: 36 acre total, 24 acres developed DENSITY: gross — 3.05; net — 4.03 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION- MAKING: Owner: Bruce Jeurissen B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC 19450 281s' Street Belle Plaine, MN 56011-5010 The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. I�1 The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 2 of 32 The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of approximately 36 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 9 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District.. The site has a high point elevation of 940' located at the north property line. The site has a low point elevation of 866' adjacent to Bluff Creek which separates the north and south halves of the property. The land south of Bluff Creek is shown on city maps as being entirely with the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone and is proposed as an area to be preserved as open space. To the north of the property is a wooded hill on the Fox parcel that is included in the Bluff r Creek Primary Corridor which is intended to be preserved. To the northeast is a ponding and wetland mitigation area for MnDOT and the Highway 212 project. To the south is a future developable area that is guided for office use. The parcel to the south will gain access via Pioneer Trail. The property to the west is Pioneer Pass, a 94 -lot single-family subdivision. As part of that development, the Bluff Creek Corridor was preserved. The initial access to the site will be from the northwest. This roadway crosses two other parcels and, therefore, must be coordinated with the development of those sites. Final plat approval will be contingent on the developer resolving the access issue. As part of this development, we are also requiring that the developer establish a second means of access to the site. This access is shown as Street C in the development plans. Staff recommends that this access be moved as far east as possible to limit its impact on the wooded hill to the north. Since this land is within the shoreland district, the city is requiring that the total open space for all lands within the shoreland district be preserved as part of the first phase of development. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 3 of 32 Additionally, the property owner will need to provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary for Outlot C, Jeurissen 1" Addition. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed development subject to the conditions of the staff report. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 7, Article III, Excavating, Mining, Filling and Grading Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article IV, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article V, Floodplain Overlay District Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXXI, Bluff Creek Overlay District Department of Natural Resources Shoreland Regulations BACKGROUND On May 9, 2011, City Council approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2012 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24. On April 12, 2010, City Council approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2011 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On June 8, 2009, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2010 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On April 28, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension to the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On May 29, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one year extension to the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following for Liberty at Creekside- Planning Case #05-24: Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 4 of 32 A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development, with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report. B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around each dwelling unit. C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, and revised April 6, 2006. D. Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Liberty at Creekside Alternative Urban Areawide Review On December 8, 2003, the City approved the 2005 MUSA Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). This document was intended to review and provide mitigation measures for all development within the 2005 MUSA area. At the time of development review, each property within the 2005 MUSA area is required to reimburse the city for their proportional share, based on the land area, of the costs for completion of the AUAR. This property is responsible for $6,285.00 as its portion of the 2005 AUAR. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 5 of 32 History of the Alternative Areawide Review (AUAR) In July of 2002, an application was submitted to the City by Town and Country Homes to build 540 townhome units on 88.5 acres in the project area. The property, known as the Bernardi property, is located in the southwest comer of the AUAR project area adjacent to Audubon Road (within the West half of the Northeast quarter of Section 27, Township 116, Range 23 West). The proposal by Town and Country Homes met the mandatory requirements for preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Over the years, staff has been made aware of other property owners expressing interests in future development. There also was interest in locating a new secondary school within the general area. Rather than just studying the subject property, city staff met with the State Environmental Quality Board (EQB) to discuss the possibility of studying the entire 2005 MUSA area through the AUAR process. The EQB supported this recommendation. How is an AUAR used? An AUAR is used as a tool to help parties interested in development within the project area understand the existing environmental and cultural resources present on a site prior to initiating detailed planning and design. It is also used to identify key initiatives that must or should be undertaken to minimize negative impacts generated by proposed development. Any proposed development in the project area would need to be reviewed for consistency with the AUAR and Mitigation Plan. If a development plan is not consistent with these documents or other statutory requirements, the developer may need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the AUAR. Natural and cultural inventory information in the AUAR and the Mitigation Plan will be used to guide development. Design and construction would proceed only after all approvals and appropriate agreements are complete. In December 2003, the City completed an AUAR for 620 acres of property located in the 2005 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). This study provides a framework for making decisions, including budgeting for improvements and providing a base of knowledge for development in this area. An AUAR is authorized under Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3610 as an alternative form of environmental review for development projects. Generally, the AUAR consists of a most likely development scenario, an inventory of environmental and cultural resources, an assessment of the "cumulative" impacts that the development scenario may have on these resources as well as public infrastructure services, and a set of mitigation measures that reduce or eliminate the potential impacts generated by the development. The AUAR is intended to address the "cumulative" impacts resulting from a sequence of related development projects. An AUAR is used as a tool to help parties interested in development within the project area understand the existing environmental and cultural resources present on a site prior to initiating detailed planning and design. It is also used to identify key initiatives that must or should be undertaken to minimize negative impacts generated by proposed development. Any proposed development in the project area would need to be reviewed for consistency with the AUAR and Mitigation Plan. If a development plan is not consistent with these documents or other statutory Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 6 of 32 requirements, the developer may need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the AUAR. Natural and cultural inventory information in the AUAR and the Mitigation Plan will be used to guide development. Design and construction would proceed only after all approvals and appropriate agreements are complete. In August 2005, the City completed a feasibility study for the 2005 MUSA area. This study identified infrastructure needs to service this area and identify costs to construct this infrastructure. The study also proposed assessments to benefiting property owners for these infrastructure costs. At about this same time, TH 212 was also being designed and eventually constructed. Infrastructure improvements that benefited the 2005 MUSA area were constructed at this time. These infrastructure improvements included tum lanes, signal system improvements, trunk watermain and trunk storm sewer improvements. In 2002 MnDOT and Jeurissen executed a temporary driveway access under the TH 212 land bridge to Pioneer Trail until such time the property develops and permanent access is provided. After the property develops, the temporary MnDOT driveway access was planned to be removed. Many property owner meetings were held for the AUAR, 2005 MUSA feasibility study and TH 212 improvements. Town and Country Homes had title to the Jeurissen property at this time and the City was working with this developer on coordinating future infrastructure improvement needs. ASSESSMENTS In January 2005, the City assessed the 2005 MUSA for benefiting infrastructure improvements associated with the TH 212 project constructed by MnDOT. In October 2005, the City assessed the 2005 MUSA for trunk watermain, sanitary sewer roadway and bridge improvements for future development of this area. The City took the lead on this project because the infrastructure improvements crossed several properties. In January 2007, the City assessed the 2005 MUSA for construction of the east/west collector roadway and additional trunk watermain and sanitary sewer. Again, the City took the lead on these infrastructure improvements since the improvements crossed several properties. Assessments were levied per parcel acreage less right- of-way and less known wetland areas. This assessment was consistent for parcels in the 2005 MUSA. Sometime after all the infrastructure improvements were made (the Jeurissen property had Town and Country Homes as the title owner), the title was transferred back to Mr. Bruce Jeurissen along with the assessments. Access to the Jeurissen property from the north will need to cross two properties to access Bluff Creek Boulevard. A small outlot was extracted from the 2°d Addition of the Pioneer Pass Development in 2011 to plan for the roadway improvements to the Jeurissen property. The Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 7 of 32 preliminary plat for The Preserve at Bluff Creek also plats the right-of-way for future access to the Jeurissen property. However, the right-of-way needed in the Preserve at Bluff Creek development for access to the Jeurissen property is currently not platted because the developer has chosen not to plat this area right now. The City's development contract for The Preserve at Bluff Creek does state this right-of-way shall be platted to facilitate the future development of the Jeurissen property. The City plans on having the developer plat this area when the next phase of this development is considered for approval. It is anticipated the next phase of The Preserve at Bluff Creek will come in for final plat in the next few months. City staff continues to meet with representatives from MnDOT, the Jeurissen property, and the Preserve at Bluff Creek development to try to resolve access and development timing issues. 2005 MUSA Expansion Project No. 04-05 Original Assessment (Just Jeurissen Property) Road: $ 96,328.76 Water: $ 22,074.96 Sewer: $ 43.374.20 Total: $161,777.92* *Assessments are fully paid off as of 12/31/12. Trunk Highway 101 /Lyman Boulevard — TH 312/TH 212 Original Assessment Road: $39,232.34 Water: $45,545.84 Total: $84,778.18* *Assessments are fully paid off as of 12/31/12. Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements Original Assessment Road: $514,238.68 Water: $ 26,091.64 Sewer: $ 60,882.33 Total: $601,212.65* *No payments have been received because the property has Green Acre status (outstanding amount with interest is: $667,834.02 as of 12/31/12). Total Assessments (For Just the Jeurissen Pro Roads: $649,799.78 Water: $ 93,712.44 Sewer: $104.256.53 Total: $847,768.75* *Does not include interest Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 8 of 32 2005 MUSA Area r• ��h y�O�j� r�.� � P�: �� O�� d1 � ►�y�� 1 4�� OF i.PAccess required with "The preliminary plat not yet acquired I a1 Access acquired with the Pioneer Pass Subdivision U Justification for Rezoning to PUD The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 24 acres from A-2, Agricultural Estate to PUD -R, Planned Unit Development -Residential. The project consists of 58 units in 32 single- family homes and 26 twinhomes. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. For a property guided Medium Density Residential, zoning consistent with the land use includes RLM, Residential Low and Medium Density District, R-8, Mixed Medium Density Residential Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 9 of 32 District or PUD -R, Planned Unit Development — Residential. Since the developer wanted a development of single-family detached and twinhome units, the R-8 district did not work because it does not permit single-family detached homes. Initially, the developer tried to use the RLM district, however, due to site topography and the location of the Bluff Creek overlay district, the developer could not meet the minimum standards for the lots and many lot width and area variances would have been required. Since the PUD -R district creates its own standards, we were able to accommodate the development while preserving significant environmental features. Since the property is guided medium density residential, the developer must maintain a minimum density of 4.0 units per acre. As proposed, the net density of the project is 4.03 units per acre. Complying with the RLM district regulations would not have permitted the development consistent with the land use plan. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to allow for lot dimension flexibility and the mixing of housing type. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more -sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development and is consistent with the comprehensive plan subject to the conditions of approval. The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. The proposed rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life -cycle. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 10 of 32 • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards govern the development of the property. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Camden Ridge a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a single-family detached and twinhome development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more -sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Camden Ridge development standards, the development must comply with the Residential Low and Medium Density District, RLM. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to single- family detached houses and twinhomes and their ancillary uses. The type of uses to be provided on common area shall be low -intensity neighborhood -oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include a bus shelter, development signage, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter, permanent open space, playground equipment and trails. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet Exterior(Perimeter) Lot Lines 50 feet Front Yard 25 feet Front Yard side street 20 feet Side Yard: garage side and house side 7.5 feet (minimum separation between buildings is 15 feet Rear Yard 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 35%* Bluff Creek Primary zone bound BCO 40 feet with the first 20 feet as buffer Minimum Lot Dimensions Standards Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 11 of 32 Single-family detached area 9,000 square feet Single-family detached lot width 70 feet 75 feet in shoreland district Single-family detached lot depth) 130 feet Twinhome lot area per unit 5,100 square feet Twinhome lot lot width 32 feet Twinhome lot lot depth) 120 feet * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 35 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 35 percent site coverage. Lots within the shoreland district may not exceed 25 percent site coverage. Lot coverage may not exceed those established in the compliance table. SUBDIVISION REVIEW The developer is proposing two different subdivisions. The initial plat, Jeurissen 15` Addition, will create four outlots. The area north of Bluff Creek (Outlot A) is being preliminary platted into blocks and lots for residential development known as Camden Ridge. The area south of Bluff Creek is being platted into three outlots. One of these outlots (Outlot B) contains areas of wetlands, bluffs and Bluff Creek and is definitely within the Bluff Creek primary zone. The other outlot (Outlot C) is presumed to be located within the primary zone, but additional evaluation is necessary to determine this. This outlot may not be developable or accessible in the future. The third outlot (Outlot D) contains the existing driveway access to the property. Staff believes that these outlots should be preserved as permanent open space. The area north of Bluff Creek, Camden Ridge, is being subdivided into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 7 outlots� z� e !. n� y • �sx e.R• A' . � a > Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 12 of 32 SHORELAND REGULATIONS That portion of the property within 300 feet of Bluff Creek is considered to be within the Shoreland Management District and is subject to the standards and requirements of Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and City Code. The intent of the shoreland rules are to protect the habitat, viewscape and water quality of the waters of the state by setting design standards to this end. However, unlike riparian lots for lakes, there are no minimum lot widths or areas for riparian lots of streams/rivers; rather, the lot dimensions are subject to the underlying zoning requirements. Other design standards apply to these lots. Structures must be setback 50 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL) and low floor elevations must be three (3) feet above the flood of record. If the flood stage elevation is unknown, the stream can either be modeled to predict the flood stage post development or the OHWL may be used. The development must comply with the MN Rules Chapter 6120 and the DNR must issue their concurrence to this effect. An adequate stormwater management and erosion/sediment control plan must be provided. These will be addressed under a separate heading. Based on the DNR Residential PUD "Base" Density evaluation (section 6120.3800, subp. 5. A.), 47 28 homes could be located within the shoreland area of the development. Sixteen units are proposed within the shoreland district. This density is calculated by dividing the area within the shoreland district by the single residential lot width standards times the tier depth. The area within the shoreland district is 462;009 758,802 square feet. The lot width times the tier depth is 27,000. Also within the shoreland district, impervious surface of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the lot area. The total proposed impervious surface of the land area within the shoreland district is 17.9 percent, which complies with this standard. Additionally, DNR regulations (section 6120.3800, subp. 5. B. (2) (a)) require that "at least 50 percent of the total project area within the shoreland district, which extends 300 feet out from the edge of the creek, must be preserved as open space". Given that the total property area within the shoreland district is 17.88 4197 acres, 8:9 8.71 acres would be required to be preserved as permanent open space. Outlot B, Jeurissen I" Addition (7.6 acres), plus part of Outlot B, Outlot C, Outlot F and Outlot G, Camden Ridge, plus the buffer areas of the lots adjacent to the Bluff Creek primary zone provide the required open space. The open space shall be established as part of the first phase of the development. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 13 of 32 VA DY 11►4`I 17.E A wetland delineation was performed, reviewed and approved in the fall of 2012. The existing conditions plan appears to accurately depict the wetland boundary. No wetland impacts are proposed as part of the design. The wetland is contained within the Bluff Creek Overlay District so the buffer protection will be coincidental to the protection of the Primary Zone. EASEMENTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS The Camden Ridge development will connect to Bluff Creek Boulevard. The right-of-way for that connecting road must be acquired. Preserve Connection t i• Bluff Creek Overlay Setback Outlot C Use to be W\Lo* c WTLot B outlot B determined PUD required 50% open space P1*NEER.,0wn w VA DY 11►4`I 17.E A wetland delineation was performed, reviewed and approved in the fall of 2012. The existing conditions plan appears to accurately depict the wetland boundary. No wetland impacts are proposed as part of the design. The wetland is contained within the Bluff Creek Overlay District so the buffer protection will be coincidental to the protection of the Primary Zone. EASEMENTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS The Camden Ridge development will connect to Bluff Creek Boulevard. The right-of-way for that connecting road must be acquired. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 14 of 32 The proposed "Easement Detail" must be revised to include how the easements around the perimeter of the twinhome lots will be platted. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Note: A development contract is being approved in conjunction with the preliminary plat to permit site grading to commence prior to final plat approval. However, before the developer may proceed with site grading, the access easement or road right-of-way must be in place. Bluff Creek flows through the property from west to east. The existing drainage on the northwest comer of the development drains into an existing retaining pond before discharging to Bluff Creek. The majority of the property's surface water runoff drains to Bluff Creek. The eastern section of the property drains into the TH 212 ditch system, and the northeast comer of the property drains northeast into a wetland. The proposed drainage would divert storm water to the existing retaining pond and three new ponds, before the water leaves the site. Pond 1 and Pond 2 would discharge water to Bluff Creek. Pond 3 would discharge water into the TH 212 ditch system. The developer has provided a storm water report which shows that this storm water management plan will comply with the City's standards. The grading plan shows a steep slope on the proposed trail near Outlot F. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail so that it will meet ADA standards. The contours near the northwest corner of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7, must be smoothed out. Between lots on the north side of Street B, the current plan shows that water may be flowing laterally from one lot into the adjacent lot. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) to show water will drain away from the structures. The final plans must note the survey benchmark on the plan set and note the existing and proposed elevations at the comers of each lot. An escrow totaling $105,376.87 (110% of the estimated erosion control for this development) is required before site grading begins. It is more efficient and cost effective to minimize the number of inlets into a stormwater best management practice. The current plan will result in five inlets into water quality basin #4 and three inlets into water quality basin #2. The applicant or their engineer must make efforts to Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 15 of 32 minimize the number of inlets into each pond to the greatest extent possible. It is preferred that only one inlet into each pond be constructed. If this is not possible, adequate explanation must be provided as to why this cannot happen. Construction costs alone are not adequate as the city will bear the cost of long-term maintenance of all proposed structures. Section 19-144 requires that stone water ponds which drain directly to Bluff Creek are constructed with a forebay which provides up to 15% of the permanent pool surface area. This forebay shall have a minimum depth of three (3) feet plus sediment storage. Portions of Block 1 and Block 5 are counter to this directive. The applicant must evaluate if the end goal can be accomplished without the proposed disturbance. Further, Section 20-1564 requires that the applicant "submit a detailed plan identiing the resources that will be disturbed and a corresponding restoration and/or mitigation plan". Based upon review of the current plans, access to maintenance of water quality basins #1, #3 and #4 appears problematic. The plans must provide for access to all pond elements that will require maintenance. This includes, among other elements, all inlets, outlets, infiltration benches and associated infrastructure, forebay dredging and main pond dredging. This access must be shown on the plan set. Bluff Creek is impaired for turbidity and fish indices of biologic integrity. It is known, through the Total Maximum Daily Load plan (TMDL) currently being reviewed by the US Environmental Protection Agency, that flow is a significant contributor to both impairments. The flow contributes in two ways. First, as hard surface is increased and the time of concentration is decreased, greater quantities of water are delivered to Bluff Creek in an increasingly compressed time frame. This "flashiness" of flows has significant erosive force and increases to delivery of sediment to and within the channel. The other way flow contributes to the impairment is by an overall reduction in base flows within Bluff Creek which leaves the creek with inadequate water volumes to sustain a healthy population of aquatic flora and fauna. This decrease in base flow is also a result of increasing hardcover, as a decrease in infiltration results in more water running off the sight as the flow flashes, and less water being slow introduced through shallow ground water stream channel interaction. Because of the findings of the TMDL and Section 19-144, the storm water facilities must be designed to infiltrate or otherwise abstract surface water runoff to the extent practicable and extended detention must be provided. Section 19-144 also requires that post -development downstream flow conditions are evaluated. The proposed filtration benches are an acceptable storm water best management practice. More detail on the design will be needed but city staff and the applicant or their representative can work together on this design. It may be possible to incorporate iron filings into the filtration benches to aid in the removal of dissolved phosphorous. The city has iron filings which they could make available to the applicant or their contractor. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 16 of 32 RETAINING WALLS The developer proposes three retaining walls on this site. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. Retaining Wall A runs parallel to River Rock Drive and will be located on Outlot A. It is 420 feet long and has a maximum height of 9 feet. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. Retaining Wall B is located between River Rock Drive and Street B. It runs along the back lot lines of the houses that front River Rock Drive. Retaining Wall B is 287 feet long and has a maximum height of 3 feet. This retaining wall must be moved so that it is not in the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. Retaining Wall C runs parallel to the northwestern edge of Pond 3. It is 122 feet long with a maximum height of 2 feet. A Homeowners Association must be created to take ownership of all retaining walls and the draintile along the face of Retaining Wall B. Surface Water Management Fees Surface Water Management trunk storm sewer fees are collected with each subdivision. The fee is based upon buildable land area and is intended to be scalar according to potential surface water runoff contribution. The fee for this development was estimated with the following assumptions. • That outlots C, E and G would not be assessed as they are used expressly for stormwater best management practices. • That the net density of the site is 4.03 units/acre — medium density • That the stormwater best management practices constructed for this project will receive and treat 16.05 acres of watershed. • The assessable land is 17.05 acres. The trunk fee is divided into water quality and water quantity. The fees are calculated as follows: BASE FEE I ACRES TOTAL WATER QUANTITY 1 $5590 1 17.05 $90,309.50 WATER QUALITY 1 $2830 17.05 $58,251.50 TOTAL $143,561.00 Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 17 of 32 Credits are given to water quality at a multiplier of one-half the water quality base fee times the number of acres treated with the facilities constructed. In this case the credit would equal: $2830/acres(0.5)* 16.05acres = $22,710.75 In addition, a credit of $2500 is given for each skimmer structure installed. It is assumed that three will be constructed granting another $7,500.00 credit bringing the total credit to $30,210.75. The estimated SWMP trunk fee due at the final plat is $113,350.25. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL A Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required as part of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Permit. This SWPPP must be provided to the city for review and comment. Generally speaking, the erosion control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of city code and the NPDES permit. City staff will provide redline comments to the applicant or their engineer specific to the plan when the SWPPP and all applicable elements are provided. STREETS The developer proposes to construct 31 -foot wide local streets throughout the development. Local streets must be within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way. Streets A and B will be 90 -foot diameter cul-de-sacs within 120 -foot wide right-of-way. At final plat, the Engineering Department will review the profile of Street A between stations 2+00 and 4+00 to ensure the profile meets the minimum length requirements for vertical curves. The proposed centerline grade at the intersection of River Rock Drive and Street A must not exceed 3%. The existing driveway for this property connects to TH 212. This driveway access to TH 212 must be closed. River Rock Drive will provide access from Bluff Creek Boulevard. The developer must obtain the right-of-way needed to make that connection. According to City Code § 18-57(k), a street terminating in a cul-de-sac cannot be longer than 800 feet. This site is bordered by TH 212 and Bluff Creek Boulevard, so an additional street connection is impractical. To comply with §18-57(k), Street C will act as an emergency access in the future. It will provide access to the north of the development in case of an emergency that could block access to Bluff Creek Boulevard via River Rock Drive. Street C is not intended to regularly carry traffic. It is 20 feet wide and is within 30 feet of right-of-way. The developer's engineer must design a Street C typical section. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 18 of 32 The development is adjacent to Bluff Creek Boulevard and is therefore subject to the arterial collector fee at the time of final plat. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN The developer proposes to construct new 8" PVC watermain that will connect to the existing 8" DIP watermain that is stubbed out from Bluff Creek Boulevard. SEH's watermain model shows that the watermain pressures would be high enough to cause surge pressures that could damage the system. To lower the water pressure and prevent potential damage by the water hammer effect, the developer's engineer must incorporate pressure reducing valves and surge protection system into the watermain plans. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBM1l-102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. The developer proposes to construct new 8" PVC sanitary sewer that will connect to the existing 8" PVC sanitary sewer that is stubbed out from Bluff Creek Boulevard. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBMH-102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. ASSESSMENTS An assessment for Bluff Creek Boulevard improvements is outstanding for this property. The principal of $601,212.65 was deferred until development and it has been accruing 6% since 2009. As of June 6, 2013, the assessment amount due was $796,302.31. At the time of the final plat, this assessment plus the additional accrued interest must be paid or reassessed. Water and sewer hook-ups are due at the time of final plat. The hook-up fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PARKS AND OPEN SPACE The quality and number of recreational facilities in a community directly contributes to its quality of life. For this reason, the City of Chanhassen places a strong emphasis on parks and open space. As the City of Chanhassen has developed and increased in population, more pressure and attention has been given to providing recreational opportunities for our residents. Increased leisure time, health awareness, greater mobility, and high disposable incomes have all contributed to the increased demand for recreational activities. The challenge of the next century will be to provide facilities for a growing and diverse population. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 19 of 32 2013 Pioneer Pass Park - Phase 1 Construction $35 ,00) - R, M1 ced rrtim FUM aE PwkMe b ramM]/ &Ins cmatM Mwe 1lmlu*s Dnml Wadhs aaarm sewer mvmw ft rv]mns b] ➢ Wwlr d D]oflballmH ewl neu DSo¢e/hamu edd ➢Tmis Nhy Nea ;Pink A96e iYdht rtand�p�g Pioneer Pass Park 1/2 Mile ServiceArea Parks can be defined as public areas that provide active or passive -oriented recreational facilities. A significant characteristic of parkland is its accessibility to its users. Open space is any parcel that is not used for buildings or other structures and is left in a natural state. Parks and open space perform diverse functions: meet physical and psychological needs, enhance and protect the resource base, enhance real estate values, and provide a positive impact on economic development. COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN The city's comprehensive park plan calls for a neighborhood park to be located within one-half mile of every residence in the city. The proposed Camden Ridge development is located within the park service area of Pioneer Pass Park. Construction of the 8.7 -acre Pioneer Pass Park site is currently underway and Phase 1 of development is expected to be complete in 2014. COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN One of the most anticipated trail extensions within the city is the north/south Bluff Creek Corridor Pedestrian Trail that extends from Lyman Boulevard south to Pioneer Trail. The proposed Camden Ridge development is poised to complete this extension. The proposed development will construct a trail starting at the current southern terminus of the Bluff Creek Trail and extending south, stopping at a location north of TH 212. In order to complete a link to Pioneer Trail, the city would like to work with the applicant and property owner to extend the trail under the TH 212 bridge to a point connecting with the existing pedestrian trail along Pioneer Trail. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 20 of 32 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The applicant has provided a tree inventory and landscaping plan for the subdivision. Bufferyard plantings are required for this development along Highway 212. Tree preservation calculations for the development are shown below. The tree preservation plan did not include areas of removal along the southern grading limits. Staff has added this removal to the calculations. Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 25.2 ac. Total canopy area (excluding wetlands) 4.5 ac Baseline canopy coverage 17.9% Minimum canopy coverage allowed 20% or 5 ac Proposed tree preservation 8% or 2.2 ac The developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed. Additional plantings will be required to bring the baseline canopy coverage up to the minimum required. Required plantings 130 trees (4.5 ac - 2.2)x1.2 110 trees required (5.0 ac - 4.5) 20 trees required The applicant has proposed a total of 129 trees in the landscape plan. The applicant will be required to plant a minimum of 130. The applicant is required to provide bufferyards along Highway 212. The minimum plantings required and the applicant's proposed quantities are shown in the table below. The applicant needs to increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. Additionally, the applicant shall revise the plant schedule in order to meet ordinance standards that state no one species will comprise of more than one third of the total number of trees. The applicant has proposed that over 37% of the proposed trees be Black Hills spruce. The applicant has not specified on the landscape plan how Outlots A, B and C will be re - vegetated after grading. The applicant shall specify seeding or sodding plans for the outlots. The applicant is proposing to remove trees outside the grading limits. Staff recommends that these trees be preserved and protected during construction. The trees are identified at #1301, 1302, and 1303. All are oaks and are located along the north property line. Required Proposed 19 overstory trees 15 overstory trees East property line - Hwy 212, bufferyard B, 980' 39 understory trees 38 understory trees 58 shrubs 0 shrubs The applicant needs to increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. Additionally, the applicant shall revise the plant schedule in order to meet ordinance standards that state no one species will comprise of more than one third of the total number of trees. The applicant has proposed that over 37% of the proposed trees be Black Hills spruce. The applicant has not specified on the landscape plan how Outlots A, B and C will be re - vegetated after grading. The applicant shall specify seeding or sodding plans for the outlots. The applicant is proposing to remove trees outside the grading limits. Staff recommends that these trees be preserved and protected during construction. The trees are identified at #1301, 1302, and 1303. All are oaks and are located along the north property line. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 21 of 32 MISCELLANEOUS Demolition permits are required for the removal of any existing structures. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. The applicant and or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. Temporary street signs must be installed prior to home construction. No burning permits will be issued. Any trees removed must either be chipped on site or removed from site. Water mains shall be made serviceable prior to combustible construction. Posts, fences, utility boxes etc. shall not be placed near fire hydrants which would hinder firefighters to quickly located and/or operate fire hydrants in a safe manner. The developer shall prepare a noise analysis for noise that will be generated by traffic on Highway 212. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which shall be implemented by the developer. COMPLIANCE TABLE Area Width Depth Maximum (sq. ft) (ft.) (ft.) Hardcover Notes (sq. ft. Single -Family 9,000 70 130 35 % * BCO location and setbacks Ll BI 12,765 90 133 4,606 must be determined#, Shoreland L2 Bl 13,129 90 146 4,606 Shoreland L3 Bl 10,451 75 132 4,606 L4 Bl 10,922 75 133 4,606 Comer lot L5 Bl 12,272 90 135 4,606 Shoreland L6 Bl 14,049 90 154 4,606 Shoreland L7 Bl 15,384 90 156 4,606 Shoreland L8 Bl 18,895 90 141 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L9 Bl 16,684 90 144 4,606 Shoreland, BCO Planning Commission Camden Ridge - Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 22 of 32 Area Width Depth Maximum (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft) Hardcover Notes (sq. ft. L10 Bl 20,388 90 138 4,606 Shoreland, BCO Lll Bl 14,733 108 132 4,606 Shoreland, Comer lot L12 Bl 18,942 93 206 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L13 Bl 16,207 109 176 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L14 B1 14,286 128 150 4,606 Shoreland, BCO Ll B2 9,902 75 132 3,984 Corner lot L2 B2 10,007 76 133 3,984 L3 B2 10,443 75 138 3,984 L4 B2 10,934 85 141 3,984 L5 B2 11,235 87 145 3,984 L6 B2 11,492 91 148 3,984 L7 B2 11,344 95 144 3,984 L8 B2 10,528 78 140 3,984 L9 B2 10,434 73 135 3,984 L10 B2 10,802 71 132 3,984 L11 B2 10,106 73 130 3,984 L12 B2 10,025 78 134 3,984 L13 B2 10,463 85 133 3,984 Corner lot Ll B5 14,702 124 145 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L2 B5 13,935 90 143 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L3 B5 14,018 90 145 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L4 B5 13,944 100 150 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L5 B5 16,513 90 181 4,606 Shoreland, BCO Twin Home 5,100 32 120 BCO, L1 B3 17,363 77 160 3,051 Perimeter, Corner lot L2 B3 6,813 43 160 1 3,051 Perimeter Planning Commission Camden Ridge - Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 23 of 32 Area (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Maximum Hardcover (sq. ft. Notes L3 B3 6,787 42 160 3,051 Perimeter L4 B3 8,224 35 162 3,051 Perimeter L5 B3 9,716 33 178 3,051 Perimeter L6 B3 10,235 33 180 3,051 Perimeter L7 B3 8,703 32 165 3,051 Perimeter L8 B3 6,813 42 160 3,051 Perimeter L9 B3 6,787 42 160 3,051 Perimeter L10 B3 7,141 41 160 3,051 Perimeter L11 B3 8,861 33 167 3,051 Perimeter L12 B3 10,751 32 192 3,051 Perimeter L13 B3 11,720 38 217 3,051 Perimeter L14 B3 9,411 43 221 3,051 Perimeter L15 B3 5,584 42 132 3,051 L16 B3 8,783 83 140 3,051 Corner lot L1 B4 5,222 42 124 3,051 L2 B4 5,305 47 124 3,051 L3 B4 6,262 66 128 3,051 L4 B4 7,314 78 138 3,051 L5 B4 8,331 94 134 3,051 L6 B4 5,928 64 126 3,051 L7 B4 7,798 85 127 3,051 L8 B4 5,174 43 126 3,051 L9 B4 5,147 43 125 3,051 L10 B4 Outlot A 7,803 70 122 3,051 Corner lot 86,064 1.97 ac.,O en space Outlot B 16,734 0.38 ac., ens ace Outlot C 37,317 0.85 ac., Storm water pond Outlot D 8,736 0.2 ac., Trail Outlot E 29,787 0.68 ac., Storm water pond Outlot F 4,312 0 .099 ac., Trail Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 24 of 32 #The boundaries of the Bluff Creek primary zone must be determined for Lot 1, Block 1. *Hard cover may be averaged over the entire PUD. Individual lots may exceed the hard cover percentage. The developer has calculated the total hard cover for the project including roads, trails, sidewalks and individual lots subject to the maximum hard cover per lot in the above table. Based on this analysis, total hard cover is 34.8 percent over the northern portion of the development, within the guidelines of the PUD -R. Within the shoreland district, the total hardcover is 17.9 percent, which complies with the maximum hard cover in the shoreland district. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A conditional use permit shall be issued by the city for all subdivisions, site plans and prior to the erection or alteration of any building or land within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district. BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT In 1996, the City completed the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (BCWNRMP). This plan recognized the unique qualities of this Area Width Depth Maximum (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Hardcover Notes (sq. ft. 0.59 ac., Outlot G 25,716 Storm water and ROW 201,204 4.62 ac. 7.63 ac., BCO Outlot B 332,446 Bluff Creek primary zone 5.01 ac., BCO Outlot C 218,301 Bluff Creek Corridor 0.43 ac., BCO Outlot D 18,815 Driveway from Pioneer Trail TOTAL 1,568 88 36.0 acres #The boundaries of the Bluff Creek primary zone must be determined for Lot 1, Block 1. *Hard cover may be averaged over the entire PUD. Individual lots may exceed the hard cover percentage. The developer has calculated the total hard cover for the project including roads, trails, sidewalks and individual lots subject to the maximum hard cover per lot in the above table. Based on this analysis, total hard cover is 34.8 percent over the northern portion of the development, within the guidelines of the PUD -R. Within the shoreland district, the total hardcover is 17.9 percent, which complies with the maximum hard cover in the shoreland district. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A conditional use permit shall be issued by the city for all subdivisions, site plans and prior to the erection or alteration of any building or land within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district. BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT In 1996, the City completed the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (BCWNRMP). This plan recognized the unique qualities of this Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 25 of 32 corridor and the opportunities it provided. The intent was to protect a natural corridor from the source to the convergence with the Minnesota River that would allow for wildlife migration, habitat protection, green space preservation, recreational opportunities, educational opportunities, protection of the bluff areas from erosion, and protection of the water quality of Bluff Creek. Site design which is sensitive to the existing natural resources is the primary method for protecting the Bluff Creek corridor. To this end the plan created the Bluff Creek Overlay District through ordinance number 286 in December of 1998 which was codified Article XXXI, Chapter 20. Much of the property lies within the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOR). It appears that this is accurately reflected on the existing conditions plan and elsewhere within the plan set. Efforts must be made to avoid grading within the secondary zone where practicable to do so. Where it is not practicable to do so, a detailed restoration plan will be required. Section 20-1564 requires that all structures be setback from the primary zone of the BCOR a minimum of forty (40) feet. It also stipulates that no disturbance may occur in the first twenty (20) feet of the setback. Portions of Block 1 and Block 5 are counter to this directive. The applicant must evaluate if the end goal can be accomplished without the proposed disturbance. Further, Section 20-1564 requires that the applicant "submit a detailed plan identifying the resources that will be disturbed and a corresponding restoration and/or mitigation plan". Section 20-1561 states that one of the intended purposes of the BCOR is "the creation of a greemvay connecting Lake Minnewashta Regional Park and the Minnesota River Valley. The greemvay will serve as an uninterrupted pedestrian trail, bikeway system, and wildlife corridor affording opportunities for recreation, education, physical fitness and non -motorized transportation". This must be balanced with the protection of Bluff Creek and the natural resources within the corridor. To this end, the trail should be aligned such that it maximizes the setback distance from Bluff Creek and the flood plain wetlands and avoids the loss of natural vegetation. By aligning the trail closer to the back lot lines, the trail itself will act to delineate the Bluff Creek Overlay District and protect the area from potential encroachment. Signage must also be placed to demarcate the corridor. The placement shown on the preliminary erosion control plan, and elsewhere throughout the plan set, is adequate. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. Grading activities have been observed within this area along the south side of Bluff Creek. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Any such areas that have been disturbed through the removal or addition of soils material prior to approval shall be addressed prior to commencement of other grading activities but no later than seven (7) days from approval. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 26 of 32 The property owner is proposing to hold Outlot C, Jeurissen I" Addition for potential future development. In the interim, the property owner must advise the city of the intended use of the property as well as how it shall be accessed. The City's Bluff Creek Primary Zone map shows this land as being within the primary zone boundaries, which is prima facie evidence of the location and type of watershed zone. The property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary. The community development director shall make a determination to maintain the officially designated watershed zone boundary or if the boundaries need to be corrected on city plans and maps based upon the data that is supplied. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the development subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Building Conditions: 1. Demolition permits are required for the removal of any existing structures. 2. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 4. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 5. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 6. The applicant and/or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. 7. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 27 of 32 En ing eering Conditions: 1. The developer must obtain right-of-way for the part of River Rock Road that connects to Bluff Creek Boulevard. 2. The proposed "Easement Detail" must be revised to include how the easements around the perimeter of the twinhome lots will be platted. 3. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail near Oudot F so that it will meet ADA standards. 4. The contours near the northwest comer of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7 must be smoothed out. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) between lots on the north side of Street B to show the grading will allow water to drain away from the structures. 6. The final plans must note the survey benchmark on the plan set. 7. The final plans must note the existing and proposed elevations at the corners of each lot. 8. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. 9. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 10. Retaining Wall B must be moved so that it is outside the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. 11. A Homeowners Association must be created to take ownership of all retaining walls and the draintile along the face of Retaining Wall B. 12. Local streets must be within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way. 13. At final plat, the Engineering Department will review the profile of Street A between stations 2+00 and 4+00 to ensure the profile meets the minimum length requirements for vertical curves. 14. The proposed centerline grade at the intersection of River Rock Drive and Street A must not be greater than 3%. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 28 of 32 15. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed. This access may be used for agricultural purposes only on Outlot C, Jeurissen 1" Addition. An access easement across Outlot B, Jeurissen 1" Addition, shall be recorded which shall follow the existing driveway alignment with a width of approximately 30 26 feet. Said easement shall be vacated should alternate access to Outlot C, Jeurissen 1" Addition become available. 16. The developer's engineer must design a Street C typical section. 17. The development is adjacent to Bluff Creek Boulevard and is therefore subject to the arterial collector fee at the time of final plat for Camden Ridge. The fee shall be $55,030.56 ($2,400 x 22.9294 acres of Outlot A, Jeurissen 1" Addition). 18. The developer's engineer must incorporate pressure -reducing valves and a surge protection system into the watermain plans. 19. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBMH-102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. 20. At the time of final plat, the Bluff Gfeek Beulevafd impr-evemeffts assessment must be paid or Feassessed. The pr-ineipal of $601,212.65 was deferred until development and it has been neerning 6% sinee 2009. $7n6ID. �0 2°�r As of june 6, 2013, the assessment amount due was Unless the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements assessment, City Project 06-05, levied against the property described on Exhibit "A" is paid in full before the plat is recorded the assessment is reapportioned against Outlot A. As of June 6, 2013, the assessment amount with accrued interest was $796,302.31. 21. Water and sewer hook-up fees must be paid at the time of final plat. Fire Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. Temporary street signs must be installed prior to home construction. 3. No burning permits will be issued. Any trees removed must either be chipped on site or removed from site. 4. Water mains shall be made serviceable prior to combustible construction. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 29 of 32 5. Posts, fences, utility boxes etc. shall not be placed near fire hydrants which would hinder firefighters to quickly locate and/or operate fire hydrants in a safe manner. Natural Resources Conditions: 1. The applicant shall increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. 2. The applicant shall plant a minimum of 130 trees in the development. 3. The applicant shall diversify the plant schedule so that no one species comprises more than one third of the total number of trees. 4. The applicant shall specify vegetation proposed for Outlots A, B and C. 5. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to the city prior to final approval. 6. The applicant shall preserve trees #1301, 1302, 1303. These trees along with trees #1393- 1398 shall be protected by fencing prior to and during any grading or construction activities. 7. The developer shall install signage at lot lines to demarcate the Bluff Creek Primary Zone. Parks Conditions: 1. Full park dedication fees shall be collected per city ordinance in lieu of requiring parkland dedication. 2. Construction of Bluff Creek Trail from its current southerly terminus, extending between the new homes and Bluff Creek to a terminus point at TH 212. The developer shall provide design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the "Bluff Creek Trail." All construction documents, including material costs, shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be 10 feet in width, surfaced with asphalt and constructed to meet all city specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for the cost of the aggregate base, asphalt surfacing, and storm water systems utilized to construct the trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials noted. Labor and installation, design, engineering and testing services are not reimbursable expenses. Planning Conditions: 1. The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as its portion of the 2005 AUAR prior to recording the final plat. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 30 of 32 2. The developer shall prepare a noise analysis for noise generated by traffic on Highway 212. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which shall be implemented by the developer. The Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone, Outlot "B", shall be conveyed to the City by warranty deed free and clear of any encumbrances or a preservation easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the plat is recorded. 4. Before any development plans are submitted for Outlot C, the property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, Jeurissen 1:i Addition. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Development of Outlot C Jeurissen 13t Addition would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternate Urban Areawide Review, AUAR. Any development would need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR. 5. The property owner must advise the city of the intended use of Outlot C, Jeurissen 15` Addition, and how it shall be accessed. This Outlot may not be developable or accessible in the future. 6. Final plat approval will be contingent on the developer resolving the access issue. Either an access easement or right-of-way must be in place prior to any site development. 7. Individual lots may not exceed the maximum hard cover per lot established in the compliance table. Water Resources Conditions: Land disturbance within the first twenty feet of the Bluff Creek Overlay District setback shall not be allowed unless the applicant can demonstrate that the goal cannot be achieved without the proposed disturbance. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 31 of 32 2. A mitigation/restoration plan must be provided for any disturbance within the Bluff Creek Overlay District or setback from the BCOR. 3. Trail must be aligned to minimize the encroachment into the BCOR primary zone and minimize loss of natural vegetation and habitat. 4. Efforts must be made to minimize the number of inlets into each pond. 5. The proposed ponds must be designed with a forebay. 6. The plans must demonstrate how water quality basin #1 and water quality basin #3 will be accessed. This includes all inlets, outlets and filtration benches as well as sediment removal from forebay and water quality volume. 7. The stormwater design shall, to the greatest extent practicable, seek to maximize infiltration, extend detention times and protect Bluff Creek from scour and other erosive conditions. 8. The applicant must evaluate downstream flow conditions as indicated in Section 19-144. 9. A Surface Water Pollution Plan and all required elements must be provided to the city for review. This plan must be compliant with NPDES requirements as well as the requirements of Chapter 19 of city code. 10. SWMP trunk fees due at final plat are estimated to be $113,350.25. 11. The development must comply with the MN Rules chapter 6120 and the DNR must issue their concurrence to this effect. 12. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. Grading activities have been observed within this area along the south side of Bluff Creek. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Any such areas that have been disturbed through the removal or addition of soils material prior to approval shall be addressed prior to commencement of other grading activities but no later than seven (7) days from approval. ATTACI 1MNTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Ordinance Rezoning to PUD -R for Camden Ridge. 3. Development Review Application. 4. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Cover Sheet. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 32 of 32 5. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Existing Conditions. 6. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Plat. 7. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Site Plan. 8. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Overall Grading. 9. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Grading Plan. 10. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Grading Plan. 11. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Erosion Control. 12. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Sanitary Sewer & Water. 13. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Sanitary Sewer & Water. 14. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Storm Water. 15. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Storm Water. 16. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Landscape Plan. 17. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Tree Preservation Plan. 18. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Tree Preservation Plan. 19. Reduced Copy Jeurissen 151 Addition. 20. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary PUD Impervious Coverage. 21. City of Chanhassen Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements Final Assessment Roll. 22. City of Chanhassen Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements Exhibit 1. 23. Letter from Michael J. Corbett (MnDOT) to Robert Generous dated June 7, 2013. 24. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. gAp1w\2013 planning ca \2013-13 camden ridge\staff report camden ridge.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION Application of U.S. Home Corporation and B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC — Camden Ridge On June 18, 2013, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of U.S. Home Corporation and B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC for a Planned Unit Development which includes the Rezoning of the property from Agricultural Estate District to Planned Unit Development — Residential, Subdivision into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, public right-of-way and outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A-2. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Medium Density. 3. The legal description of the property is shown in the attached Exhibit A. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property- 5. roperty5. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) effects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; C. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant adverse environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. Adequate infrastructure is in place or proposed with the development. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: (1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. (2) Lack of adequate roads. (3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. (4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 6. When approving a conditional use permit, the City must determine the capability of a proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the conditional use Section 20-232, include the following 12 items: a. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. The proposed development will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. c. The proposed development will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. The proposed development will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed development will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed development will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed development will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. The proposed development will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed development will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. The proposed development will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Articles IV, V and VI of the Chanhassen City Code. 7. The planning report #2013-13 dated June 18, 2013, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 18`b day of June, 2013. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION I -VA Its Chairman EXHIBIT A The Northwest quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116. Range 23 (referred to herein as Tract A) ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North an Section Line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a pant an the South Section lire of add Section. 30 feet East of the Southwest comer of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest caner of said Section and place of beginning. Being a three—cornered place In Southwest corner of add Sectlon 23, Township 116, Range 23, ALSO: 6eglming at the Southeast canner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Ouarter of Section 26, Township 116. North of Range 23 West; thence south along the quarter—quarter section line a distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14; thence east along the north line of said Carver County Road No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the aforementioned quarter—quarter sectwn B27 feet to a pont 26 feet north of the east—west quarter—quarter section line of the Northwest Ouarter of sold Section 26, thence West a distance of 25 feet to the quarter—quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of beginning (referred to herein as Tract B). EXCEPT: that part of Tract A which Iles Easterly of UNE 1 described below: LINE 1. Commencing ort the north quarter corner of sold Section 26; than" run weat an an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section 1634.23 feet to the pont of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence an an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds far 366.71 fast then" an an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 478.28 feet thence an an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minute, 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on on azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a pant an the south fine of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Ouarter and there terminating; and EXCEPT that part of Tract 8 which Iia Northwesterly and Southwesterly of UNE 2 described below: UNE 2. Commencing at the point of termination of Una 1 described above; thence run east an an azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 aseands along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Ouarter of sold Section 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence an an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds for 448.73 feet: thence an an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 fest; thence on an azimuth of 105 degrees 08 mnutes 31 seconds far 351.75 feet; thence on on azimuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating; Together with right of access retained In Quit Claim Deed Document him 310751 pursuant to Access Drhwway Permit dated August 26, 2012. El AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Camden Ridge to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Camden Ridge a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a single-family detached and twinhome development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more -sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Camden Ridge development standards, the development must comply with the Residential Low and Medium Density District, RLM. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to single- family detached houses and twinhomes and their ancillary uses. The type of uses to be provided on common area shall be low -intensity neighborhood -oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include a bus shelter, development signage, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter, permanent open space, playground equipment and trails. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet Exterior(Perimeter) Lot Lines 50 feet Front Yard 25 feet Front Yard (side street) 20 feet Side Yard: garage side and house side 7.5 feet (minimum separation between buildings is 15 feet *The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 35 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 35 percent site coverage. Lots within the shoreland district may not exceed 25 percent site coverage. Lot coverage may not exceed those established in the compliance table. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager day of , 20, by the City Council of the City (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Setback Standards Rear Yard 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 35 % * Bluff Creek Primary zone bound (BCO) 40 feet with the first 20 feet as buffer Minimum Lot Dimensions Standards Single-family detached area 9,000 square feet Single-family detached lot width 70 feet 75 feet in shoreland district Single-family detached (lot depth) 130 feet Twinhome lot area per unit 5,100 square feet Twinhome lot lot width 32 feet Twinhome lot lot depth) 120 feet *The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 35 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 35 percent site coverage. Lots within the shoreland district may not exceed 25 percent site coverage. Lot coverage may not exceed those established in the compliance table. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager day of , 20, by the City Council of the City (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Planning Case No.,-ZO -/_3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100 RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION MAY 17 2013 Applicant Name and Address: Prope /b76S 3 �e AJ 6oa t� F Con act:Toe Conta Phone: 9sz toy Jor4 Fax: Phone Email: fro t6rrn t4 ��e ,co+ Email. -IANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT e and Address: (.I r -term=, I -LL NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP)4c�`o Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning / . Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review (SPR) (';nc.� Play' _ZSubdivision*640'4-iXL0)= ii 0 Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (VAC) (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment , X Notification Sign -$200 (City to install and remove) X EscroFiling Fees/Attomey Cost' 50 - 550;�u SPRNACNARNVAP/Metes 8 Bounds - $450 Minor SUB4 ;k O I a= TOTAL FEE $ -7) iBa O . oo An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be Invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. - -- *Five (5) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8'/:" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tif) format. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME: Ca m d e n LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: 7-502.3 1,30o a; T' I 1 L' Pa. -3 TOTAL ACREAGE: TS to WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING: Aa REQUESTED ZONING: _ PU17--Rt PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: /moi i d FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW: Include number of existing employees: and new employees: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or dearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to car* that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Tale or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knnwlarlae LeosNo 1. COVER ER HEET 2. EXISTING CONDMONS 3. NvoYo s �u. xMn � Y YMR 4 NRnur � w w a.rt vxM 6-8. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN (� 9. GRADING DETAILS 10. M0r0Y..¢iNw� 11. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 12-13. PRELIM. SANITARY SEWER & V • • YLmMM ECRM . . Rnl1[0 [b \ / LI. MIX.x[. x°R" RMxYM n NNM fICRu )LMT M,rtn %ems rw�Re � wri[n RR rM.Y lw [ xM tMM UX[ 1 A. ]' cOvIM lM[ RMO1[0 .4' c� wLT LK rµ wpML° YOi LL(v.eM ♦ � � [uuaxcv OKML4Y — IXlA M. a1[ II . RY.1 RMLnM MUM.Rv x[rN-WM1 [ROXx CMIN Ma rtK[ n[a.wt w cMYRvxrox[u[N sM Mn� •vru vM _ KRr oKRMNO DRnr Lw[s -- — uxo[wwxD RKxrew w[ ----.— n. Y+oRaNO Raww[uM -- ¢ LIME tL Cm t UK -- w�°nMouxoM° --- — nMa+Mo.+D us [l r[rK[ (Mrr LRaI J [r RM[ (MM) • [r C.41 UM uDMIMNr Li RV U sUATAI n. xuon»x[ n,..•1 u RK 'M an. IMrr°a "n v ru[ p: uw xwA[u vuD RG MI. ..AA ♦ [A is [r. rturxo• w. a. rtsr Na[ a mL.re .R. LL K [y, .DRr. MY "R A rm, JEURISSEN PARCEL PRELIMINARY PLAT PLANS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA \\ �•, CITY OF CHANHASSEN `• , RECEIVED MAY 17 2013 1 CHANHASSEN PUNNING DEPT \ 1•l `' pL PRINTED e n n[uwr © a .Mx..Nr Rr[ O[x M,YL 4YR KC On. •nMwws 1. suss[ JUJIMM g'IKL .. xxn.w• MAY 17 2013 PIONEER ENGMERh'dCz P.A. m LL! TIORMAP / 1. COVER ER HEET 2. EXISTING CONDMONS 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT 4. SITE PLAN 5. PRLMINARY BURLDING PLAN 6-8. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN (� 9. GRADING DETAILS 10. EROSION CONTROL PLAN 11. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 12-13. PRELIM. SANITARY SEWER & V 14-15. PRELIM. STORM SEWER 1-T2. TREE PLAN \ / LI. LANDSCAPE PLAN SCANNED - s 2 f � f ' 1. ��a-140' I $ '� 2 a r a .:. �• \N )1\S �Z� / �! r j - •.' F Y'w_�S R PAZ%S 3 t •f � �$/f �/r 2N� - {�y+ ]l-.y.f2•. Pg'ti4 ler � �y i �f3.r ,ft /J•K,ty:�"- �r 2 !k4'�L.�sS �,y�i 1\ „' hT 'fir ({• •y�l`b.`i a'S d�.t�- _ e1J./.t ,l� ' ;I .'o 1.l r.` i ,' � .,.."�"•;:;;�r^ � a�.�:'i\ 1. ��a-140' \N )1\S �Z� / �! r j - •.' F Y'w_�S R PAZ%S 3 t •f � �$/f �/r 2N� - {�y+ ]l-.y.f2•. Pg'ti4 ler � �y i �f3.r ,ft /J•K,ty:�"- �r 2 !k4'�L.�sS �,y�i 1\ „' hT 'fir ({• •y�l`b.`i a'S d�.t�- _ e1J./.t ,l� I O W z z U C/) ' E '' I $ '� a .:. �• pp I O W z z U C/) a� I \ Y Y Si aFe$ �N I 8•— e3;a \ I oW #i f \ a� I \ Y Y \ I a a e¢cx"=_aFsa5 \ a #� pt a)) � � t �51.%s .. ro,. "✓« "`�'-k r•f.va ae =E93q x. -"°-x 2 E a� T I \ \ I \ a #� pt a)) � � t �51.%s .. ro,. "✓« "`�'-k r•f.va ae =E93q x. -"°-x Y ae Ll e d +r e�:• a UI n�� \ / \\ x m� YP • d7 \ / J _ � sw•o yi .[ I I i T F - t Y 0 r FOa S W O l O< W O m �N'N < �i ryry�S" ten. 2ND 0 ppnn�� po n 3 m OI =NoVN$ Sn8[nVy YO OpJ <NU� WV�Wm<m� F F¢0zz .<F O�06FNN3 �'f G6NF� C�6 Wf1m3 Op8�06� O� �i339 ZA Z WK Orf 00 O K '1 3 d %n• W ¢0004 WON 0002 0 OO 222 npOON wn 2an aY u� I eO - � -� d�. 59 � � • .1 \ M � :a 1.7 • • W A 0 W Z Q U U) d/ j I ; i =$a \`:. '\, cif/ii�i�iiiS i�i Jy�r.•.// jr i,, j % l F ! J 3 8 i •1` `: /� i t } \t \ 1 J/ I. \`:. '\, cif/ii�i�iiiS i�i Jy�r.•.// jr i,, Jc- j % l Jc- - i r J-1 'Al e �a a z sE � ym iy i a c 'aa 1\I 1 Pill j hRE / k i g Egg . fig .J W� a o id 8A5'ffiA'yy�:SR iQ• fedi =a 36��a /� AAAl�i It I � I € N 6iR: W 31 105t par �a AEE is Fill _. " 031 €€ egC �iaF z S Q i'• iP I� Ii i! 6 i 1fg f I mak€ '1 I� !'11 w e!IS€ID #I1'.'1 si1' ?I: gi s 2 �•g3 �i ¢d � ��Oc $¢ ww- � � 3 � ><mpu Wi w z 15 p� L � RISE E I`•E h�E`1:;�.g�iE 1P 3 4 :• d d g � � ff i Q rc PI� •99�r�E °�t yell IIt €? II.�e:.I 11441flIm HI! j iiEOS u •a.r .:'' Com• '� \ X2+)1•"�� s �.. Zi l ��.r�\., � i 4� ���•i.:. %ice/ / � �\I} � � ���// —_— �..• i •1 til f ,�f�� a /i''�Zsh. �l \'� VA �i •,.� ' / � . , } � } � \ .7 \ � L \\"ger ^ fill v E Y' / j/ > -. , x t, vtl N• Xi /� •- JlirYiA'� NI f %I// Jr,i''' � � �er'�f/i /i y+ • J/qr } t � W I � L f _. r (} :�' 8 I /5�yga s/ DL 0 W Z Q d r -------------- ]---- -399 SR EE �� #Eff`°#fE _:f'•"��lz aatEES s� dS§"as9"t5ESFEiSjfiFS96S-d9gSEE :€§M°i 5t#fill d!f$F Sf `j#aE a#f#ifFS;f5;•#i€�S_a1E §999§§999E ;f .;!i€!•ia!s"t!Sa.`d#!fa�!ia.iE!i' !i e- i§i§9iii#"5 3i's99 9§9S§4i9i i99i'Y3iii9 99§999"s999-i§9i9i3ii3 €f F y ££ -[-y `5{{ tt`` FFggEEEEFFS5 # gg EEEE g ffgg 66BgEE 66E6[f E E5 5 €€ - R.• •.A. 33399 AS 3 CA•.. SAAS-A49 . -4 . -n3 9R AR49.-.R.• .....;;.9] b1aF 1 € df11 S€Sgll`B`5`5`5 € S 5`lSSf 0. #9`;Sat a! dttt fdff f€f€€ 3fftS3H f€If ffittff 1111 JOIN 3'fffff 3f€f' f€fli ffii "Elft s€fS > -1011111MR1141RI Nil9A I9 1 9 9 9t9 1 9ImIgIRWR I9 9 1S SS_S 1 -mo9 Pill \ ✓ r a L/ \ !:i � rte^'\>"t'� Jam,_ —�\,\ r r. ` � '• � i , \ "� u r ( r P.FI' 0 w z 0 U gg7 k 1Y \a o y� Sle I stl1 ¢�'a 9 YY3 gin tld$aap a / N%( b c am E�ym3g tl tl wai pig, - / / '�tl e ff / F jtl z /n rjtz, 7 e 71 all w gg7 k 1Y \a o y� Sle I stl1 ¢�'a 9 YY3 gin tld$aap a g N%( b c am E�ym3g tl tl wai pig, - '�tl F 7 e gg7 K ! SE I stl1 ¢�'a 9 YY3 gin tld$aap a g N%( b c am E�ym3g tl tl wai pig, - o L� o- z z s e X� I stl1 ¢�'a S '�tl 'ION �:`r/ fA 64 W m O � ryN �y i - nm 5 �x o o ai<�� wa .. o o� • $� x w rc H x Ws��s< oQ IL o O WKS pm n n rc�o v�in�ie 00 'ION �:`r/ fA 64 �y F 2 W ~v W _ J cc 0 N n'4 O A Q Z W ZDV N Qj .cq o I� I 11 I r./ .( I -- � --- T--J� LOWLANDS PUBLI IMPROVEMENTS BID PACKAGE #1 SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED BLUFF CREEK BOULEVARD In 0 C9 OF I \ I � PROPOSED DRABIAGE`� 0 o xx xo 0i xuc x rar ��� �ANocU1K Inn CITY OF CHANHASSEN BLUFF CREEK BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 06-05 PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT I 111 PROPOSED TRUNK -1 WATERMAIIJ P I 1 AUDUBON RQAD - I 4NTERSECTIO ) IMPROVEMENTS — — — — — — — — — — — — I• � L � LOWLANDS PUBLI IMPROVEMENTS BID PACKAGE #1 SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED BLUFF CREEK BOULEVARD In 0 C9 OF I \ I � PROPOSED DRABIAGE`� 0 o xx xo 0i xuc x rar ��� �ANocU1K Inn CITY OF CHANHASSEN BLUFF CREEK BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 06-05 PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT I Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 June 7, 2013 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner 7700 Market Blvd City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Camden Ridge MnDOT Review # P13-025 North of US 212, west of Powers Blvd Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1013 Dear Mr. Generous, Thank you for the opportunity to review the above referenced plat. MnDOT has reviewed the plat and has the following comment: Water Resources: MnDOT does not allow an increase in storm water discharge to MnDOT right-of-way. Please submit documents specified below with a drainage permit application: 1. Final drainage plan showing storm sewer plan, storm sewer and culvert profiles and pond contours 2. Existing and proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows 3. Existing and proposed drainage/pond computations for the 2, 10, and 100 year rainfall events Please direct any questions regarding water resources to Hailu Shekur (651-234-7521 or hailu.shekurAstate.mmus of MnDOT Metro District's Water Resources Section. Permits: As previously stated, a drainage permit is required. Additionally, any use of or work within or affecting MnDOT Right-of-way and/or utilities requires a permit. A short form permit is required for the utilities that are connected within MnDOT Right-of-way. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's permit website at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/permits/. Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-234-7911 or buck.craig6d,state.mn.us) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf. version of the plans. MnDOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews.dot(a4state.mn.us provided that each separate e- mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: MnDOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disc. 4. Plans can also be submitted to MnDOT's External FTP Site. Please send files to: ftp://ftn2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/incoming/MetroWatersEdge/Planning Internet Explorer doesn't work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dot ,state.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. If you have any questions concerning this review, please feel free to contact me at (651)234-7793. Sincerely, Michael J. Corbett, PE Senior Planner Copy sent via E -Mail: Diane Langenbach, Area Engineer Hailu Shekur, Water Resources Nancy Jacobson, Design Buck Craig, Permits Becky Parzyck, Right -of -Way Dave Torfin, Survey David Sheen, Traffic Engineering Clare Lackey, Traffic Engineering Ann Braden, Metropolitan Council CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on June 6, 2013, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. 4Ken*J-gelb dt, Deputy Clerk d and sworn to before me day of�r`Qrie, , 2013. W�W� IM T, MEUWISSENotary Public -Minnesota lio Notary PCommission Expires Jan 31, 2015 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. _ Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of Proposal: approximately 36.2 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 10 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Applicant: Lennar Property 1500 Pioneer Trail Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1, Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. _ If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2013-13. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at baenerousaci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Cay Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party Is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/Industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard, Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representafive is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included In the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of thea enda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. _ Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of Proposal: approximately 36.2 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 10 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Applicant: Lennar Property 1500 Pioneer Trail Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2013-13. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at boenerous(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party Is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard, Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the applicatlon will be included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included In the report, lease contact the Planning Stall person named on the notification. ARTHUR B & MARY ANN JOHNSON B ELMER FAMILY FARMS LLC BRADY CLEMONS 10676 JACKSON DR 19450 281 ST ST 1655 HEMLOCK WAY EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347-4425 BELLE PLAINE MN 56011-5010 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4516 BROCK JUSTIN FLUEGGE 1671 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317-5001 DANIEL J GANTZER 1670 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317-5001 ERIC M ENGLUND 1660 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317-5001 GLEN H SCHOENBERG 1665 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4516 JENNIFER J PENTTINEN 1575 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4516 KELSEY PEYTON 1565 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4543 PETER H ZUBERT 1680 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317-5001 RYAN G BARETTE 1651 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317-5001 YUCHING WONG 1674 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 - BRYAN CROES 1595 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4543 DAVID B LEFEVRE 1650 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317-5001 FOX PROPERTIES LP 27990 SMITHTOWN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7911 HOLLY A SCHULTZ 1661 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317-5001 JOHN T SANTINI JR 1625 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4516 KORY L GROSKREUTZ 1615 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4516 PETE RSON-JACQUES FARM LAND CO 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347-4047 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRAN ST PAUL MN 55155-1801 JOE JABLONSKI 16305 36TH AVE N STE 600 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 CASSANDRA K KRAUS 1605 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4516 DEGLER LAND COMPANY LLC 541 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8697 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 14096 CLEARVIEW DR SHAKOPEE MN 55379-9645 JEFFREY H HABERMAIER 1664 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4516 JOSEPH FELIU JR 1645 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4516 NANCY W DRAHOZAL 1585 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4543 RUSSELL J HOLMES 1635 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4516 THE RYLAND GROUP INC 7599 ANAGRAM DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344-7399 CHAI-)wI.0 K GROUP, INC;. x June 18,'_013 To: Planning Commission. City of Chanhassen Cit,, Council City of Chanhassen Fr: John Chadwick on behalf of Mr. Bruce Jeurissen, B. Elmer Farms. LLC J RE: Bruce Jeurissen Farm- Camden Ridge The purpose of this letter is to offer additional input and information in written torn to be considered by planning commission and city council. This prgject has been a long time in coming and it would have been sold long ago and the assessments paid had the sale in 2(1)6 gone through. Recently the City Council directed Cit) staff to put) together some information a few months ago_ 1 am not certain if that made it to final fort and was distributed. fhe City stafT has been working hard on all of these items but it has not been without a few maior difficulties along the way. Mr. Jeuris o -n is generally in favor of the prgject and wants to see this action proceed in a fair and equitable manner. Access and Assessments 1) The property was accessed from the south of f of Pioneer Trail before HwN 212 was built. Exhibit la and lb hotrt MNI)OF (attached) shows the frontage road that was to be built to replace the dri%cwa% access. The fromave road was to service both the portion of the farm north and the portion of the fart south of the creek. It was never built. MNDO'f elevated Highway 212\ rather than building it at grade. after the acquisition of the land from Bruce. which meant the current driveway has never "Closed". It still exists under the 212 bridges. If'_ 12 was built according to plan. then it would have closed the driveway and the frontage road would had to have been built. 2) MND01 in its acquisition from the proper owner to the west, did acquire land necessary to provide access as MNDOT owns land with frontage on Pioneer Pass to the west all the way east to the Southwest comer of the south par[ of the Jeurissen farm. 3) The MNDOT taking "addendum to ofl"er to self' item 14 cleanly calls not for replacement of the driveway by a MNDOT or a governmental unit and not by the landowner. See exhibit 2. The MNDOT sale went through in 200'. 41 A contract between Jeurissen and Town and Country Homes was entered into statina, landowner was to be paid for land used in the development including paying for land that supported the' -transfer of density -. Fshihit 3 is a letter from %,It. Robert Generous to Mr. Kevin Clark of I own and Country f tomes clearly states that "transfer of density" was not used. The development that was approved in 2006 called for (46-- units North of the Creek and zero South. A lawsuit be m cen sel ler and Town and Country ensued. The deed to property was placed in escrow, and never transferred to Iown and Country. Ultimately the sale was killed as Town and Country as a result of Exhibit 3, felt they did not have to pay for any land south of the Creek, however that land was to be dedicated to the City for park.'open space. During the court proceedings it was determined that there was 8.09 acres of land usable South of the Creek. 5) Since there is 8.04 acres of usable land South of the ('reek, and no transfer of density was used before, or in this action for 58+- units. there is still considerable land value in the South_ 6) The City process has assessed the farm based on 3U acres out of a gross acreage of 36 acres. Only 22 acres lire north of the creek, again that would support the notion that 8 acres to the South of the creek would have or must have benefit of the Bluff Creek Boulevard assessment. If the actions taken were to deem the south as not usable, how can there he an assessment'' 7) While Town and Country did sign up for the Bluff Creek Boulevard assessment. they, did not have title to the property due to the lawsuit. The deed was held in escrow. 8) The Citv asked l own and Country sign up for the assessment, at a time when then did not owns the parcel and there was no access to Bluri Creck Boulevard. How is it that the land is asked to pay interest on Bluff Creek Boulevard and _vet it could not and still cannot use the road that they were paving fort 9) How is it that as of June. 2013 there is still no access to that improvement*' It is requested that with no access. there should be no interest paid on this assessment. Access was a condition of approval for Ryland?now Degler in 2006, yet it was not enforced/required at that time. When the nest phase for Degler was approved, the access easement could have been enforceWrequired. but it was not. It is now being lbrced as a private matter. When the adjacent Peterson property was developed. the land was deeded to the City on a timely basis to allow the access to occur. (The access crosses Degler and the former Peterson farm to reach Jeurissen) Land to be provided for open space I ) The City is requesting landowner to provide land south of the creek for the open space for this development. It will leave the landowner with just five acres remaining south of the creek. Any such land transferred will require an easement across this provided land so that the retained parcel will have continued access to driveway to the south. Landowner has been working with hINDOT to rectify this issue for over one year. There is no resolution as of this date. As of June 13, 2013 it was communicated verbally that the issue was being transferred out of the Ombudsman's office and over to MNDOI' Metro Right of Way Division. Once suitable alternate access is provided to the retained parcel, this right of access (easement) can be eliminated. _n) Additionalh. since there are eight acres per the court case. and landowner is only able to retain five acres south of the creek. it is requested that there be no further open space requirements!dedications;takings when the land is later developed. Conclusions- to be recommended to City Council by Planning Commission I I Assessments on five acres retained will stay on the live acres and will he paid w hen them is benefit provided by the assessment_ The fact that assessments are being paid on three acres of the south parcel and yet being provided to the City is interesting in and of itself. 2) Interest on the remaining assessment shall be waived since there is no access. Interest would start to acerae on the day there is access. Several hundred thousand dollars of assessments for other projects have already been paid on behalf of this property and no benefit has been received to date. This would be a middle ground. 19 Assessments on land provided to City, shall be transterred to Cite with assessments intact, and not paid by landowner who is providing the land. 4) There shall be no additional open space requirements for the retained parcel. An easement over Outlot B to the retained parcel shall be put in place and remain until resolution with MNIX)T. List ol'Eshibits la MNDOI MAP (red) Ib MNDO"I Map (septnent z') Addendum of offer to sell (see item 14) 3 Mr. C;enerous letter to Mr. Clark Comments on the staff report to Planning Commission for review June 18. 2013 P6 of 31 paragraph 2. There is a reference to "under the TH 212 bridge". This is not correct. In 2(X)2 when executed, there was no 1'H212 bridge contemplated. TIi 212 was to be built at grade and not elevated. Without abridge. the passage under could not physically be possible. P6 of 31 paragraph 3 "Town and Country Homes had title" The title was in escrow. they were to have made payments June 2. 2006 and ten days after. The second payment A as not made and the decd went into escrow P6 of 31 paragraph 5 "Homes as title owner". See above. As a result of the lawsuit and the settlement thereot. all rights and obligations of Town and Country, were transten-ed hack to Mr. Jeurissen in exchange for certain actions on behalf of Mr. Jeurissen. P7 of 31 paragraph 4 and P18 of 31 paragraph' Assessments lin Bluff Creek Blvd Improvements. It states the amount due " $667,834.02 as of 1211 li 2012 and on page 18 states as of June 6, 2013 the assessment amount due was $796,302.31 At 6% interest for '/1 year the 667,834.02 only grows to $687,869.04. There is an arithmetic issue here to he resokcd. P7 of 19 paragraph. It states "In order to complete a link to Pioneer Trail" This is something that needs to be negotiated. Perhaps a non-exclusive right of use at die discretion of land owner. Once the MN DOT access issues to the south are resolved. further discussion would be in order. P27 of 31 paragraph I Item I ."dcveloper must obtain right of way" This has caused considerable delay. price reductions and interest cost for the project as noted earlier. P28 of 31 paragraph I Item 15 "driveway access closed" No. this must wait until MNDOT issues are resolved. We have tried for a year, but have not one thing in writing back from MND01' as of 6/13/2013. P28 of 31 paragraph 6 Item 20 -or reassessed' This would be to Outlot B (donated or dedicated) parcel and to the retained parcel Outlot C. P29 of 31 paragraph 9 Item 4 "shall provide" This will be done at time of development. not at this time P30 of31 paragraph 1 Item 5 "intended use,. Property owner must retain an casement across Outlot B to service the property and will release that easement once suitable access or resolution is provided by MNDOT. It will he used for fxmtirw at this time. NN41 ;ao EXHIBIT' A ADDENDUM TO OFFER TO SELL AND MEMORANDUM OF CONDITIONS 13. It is further agreed that the owner will have the right to lease the property involved in this transaction at reasonable agricultural rental rates. Said lease shall begin immediately following the normal possession period granted by the state. 14. The owner will be allowed to utilize their present driveway for ingress and egress to the remainder of their property, until such time as the driveway is removed and replaced by the State of Minnesota or a lower governmental authority for construction piuposes, at which time the replacement route shall be used. 15. It is understood and agreed at the owners request, that the owner will waive all relocation+, claims in order to expedite this settlement. It is further understood by the owner and the State of Minnesota that this sale is made tinder the threat of condemnation of dte property by the State of Minnesota. 16. Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, buyer acknowledges that except for the warranties, representations and covenants explicitly set forth in this agreement or in owners closing documents, the owner and buyer agree that buyer will accept possession of the property in its AS -IS condition, WITH ALL FAULTS. 17. The State of Minnesota shall pay the cost of recording all documents related to this agreement, including without limitation the quit claim deed and the partial release of mortgage. �J ----Original Message ----- From: Generous, Bob[mailto:bgenerousCa)ci.chanhassen.mn.usl Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:13 AM <� To. Kevin Clark 'c: Shawn Siders; Aanenson, Kate abject: Ubarty at Creekside Kevin: As pan of the Liberty at Creekside development, Town and Country Homes did not transfer density from the south side of the creek to the developed area on the north side of the creek. The city originally calculated the overall net density for the project at 4.7 units per acre. This calculation only removes Outlot A, existing wetlands, slopes in excess of 30% and right-of-way. The density of the development north of Bluff Creek, at 7.28 units per acre, would still be within the Residential — Medium Density Land Use for the property. In calculating the density north of Bluff Creek, I subtracted 0.43 acres of Outlot A, 12.64 acres of Outlot D, 0.44 acres of Outlot E and 2.44 acres of right-of-way from the 36.01 acres within the site, which leaves 20.06 acres. The Bluff Creel, Overlay Ordinance states: "Density clustering shall be allowed as a tool to facilitate cluster development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Density clustering may be used in areas where portions of the site are unsuitable for development because of the location of the primary zone. Density clustering shall not be allowed for areas that are otherwise considered unbuildable due to wetlands, lakes and other areas not suitable for ' tilding purposes. In areas where density clustering is applicable, density may be transferred to unconstrained parts of the site within land included in the secondary zone, subject to the restrictions of this ordinance, and within land lying outside of identified zone areas." If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bzenqr—ous@!;l.chmhassen.ma.us. :.., is PX.4- �. 1lNCI C U TOIIIrCv�u N DI 000367 Liberty at Creelside March 21, 2006 Pane 3 of 23 APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments _ Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article N, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article V, Floodplain Overlay District Chapter 20, Article VI, Weiland Protection Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 9, Design Standards for Multifamily Developments Chapter 20, Article XXM, Bluff Creek Overlay District REZOMNG The property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for Residential -?Medium Density as well as parks and open space over the Bluff Creek corridor. Appropriate zonings for this land use designation include Planned Unit Development --Residential (PUD -R), Mixed Low Density Residential, if twin homes (R4), Mixed Medium Density Residential (R8) or Low and Medium Density Residential (RL --ND. The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 36 acres from A2 to PUD -R, Planned Unit Development -R. The project consists of 146 townhouse units in 29 structures. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of rhe vrm =, .t s inc anrr ia_ t� rpt density clustering for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The use of the PUD zoning sates for an internal transfer of densi.. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility. the City has the expectation that the eve opment plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning dist-ices. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development and preserves the Bluff Creek corridor subject to the recommended modifications to the plan. The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan.- • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased i, accordance with the ability of the city to provide services 5 PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning, subdivision and conditional use permit for the Camden Ridge development subject to the conditions of the staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting a Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 9 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. CAMDEN RIDGE LOCATION: 1500 Pioneer Trail (PID 25-0232300) " APPLICANT: Applicant: Lennar Attn: Joe Jablonski U.S. Home Corporation 16305 3e Avenue North, Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 (952)249-3014 joe.jablonski@Lermar.com PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District, A-2 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Medium Density (4.0 — 8.0 units per net acre) ACREAGE: 36 acre total, 24 acres developed DENSITY: gross — 3.05; net — 4.03 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION- MAKING: Owner: Bruce Jeurissen B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC 19450 281` Street Belle Plaine, MN 56011-5010 The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. V. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. SCANNED Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 2 of 31 The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of approximately 36 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 9 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District.. The site has a high point elevation of 940' located at the north property line. The site has a low point elevation of 866' adjacent to Bluff Creek which separates the north and south halves of the property. The land south of Bluff Creek is shown on city maps as being entirely with the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone and is proposed as an area to be preserved as open space. To the north of the property is a wooded hill ✓ on the Fox parcel that is included in the Bluff G Creek Primary Corridor which is intended to be preserved. To the northeast is a ponding and wetland mitigation area for MnDOT and the Highway 212 project. To the south is a future developable area that is guided for office use. The parcel to the south will gain access via Pioneer Trail. The property to the west is Pioneer Pass, a 94 -lot single-family subdivision. As part of that development, the Bluff Creek Corridor was preserved. The initial access to the site will be from the northwest. This roadway crosses two other parcels and, therefore, must be coordinated with the development of those sites. Final plat approval will be contingent on the developer resolving the access issue. As part of this development, we are also requiring that the developer establish a second means of access to the site. This access is shown as Street C in the development plans. Staff recommends that this access be moved as far east as possible to limit its impact on the wooded hill to the north. Since this land is within the shoreland district, the city is requiring that the total open space for all lands within the shoreland district be preserved as part of the first phase of development. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 3 of 31 Additionally, the property owner will need to provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary for Outlot C, Jeurissen I" Addition. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed development subject to the conditions of the staff report. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 7, Article III, Excavating, Mining, Filling and Grading Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article IV, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article V, Floodplain Overlay District Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXXI, Bluff Creek Overlay District Department of Natural Resources Shoreland Regulations BACKGROUND On May 9, 2011, City Council approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2012 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05-24. On April 12, 2010, City Council approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2011 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On June 8, 2009, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension until May 22, 2010 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On April 28, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension to the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On May 29, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one year extension to the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following for Liberty at Creekside- Planning Case #05-24: Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 4 of 31 A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development, with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone (Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A-2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report. B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around each dwelling unit. C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, and revised April 6, 2006. D. Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Liberty at Creekside Alternative Urban Areawide Review On December 8, 2003, the City approved the 2005 MUSA Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). This document was intended to review and provide mitigation measures for all development within the 2005 MUSA area. At the time of development review, each property within the 2005 MUSA area is required to reimburse the city for their proportional share, based on the land area, of the costs for completion of the AUAR. This property is responsible for $6,285.00 as its portion of the 2005 AUAR. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 5 of 31 History of the Alternative Areawide Review (AUAR) In July of 2002, an application was submitted to the City by Town and Country Homes to build 540 townhome units on 88.5 acres in the project area. The property, known as the Bernardi property, is located in the southwest comer of the AUAR project area adjacent to Audubon Road (within the West half of the Northeast quarter of Section 27, Township 116, Range 23 West). The proposal by Town and Country Homes met the mandatory requirements for preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Over the years, staff has been made aware of other property owners expressing interests in future development. There also was interest in locating a new secondary school within the general area. Rather than just studying the subject property, city staff met with the State Environmental Quality Board (EQB) to discuss the possibility of studying the entire 2005 MUSA area through the AUAR process. The EQB supported this recommendation. How is an AUAR used? An AUAR is used as a tool to help parties interested in development within the project area understand the existing environmental and cultural resources present on a site prior to initiating detailed planning and design. It is also used to identify key initiatives that must or should be undertaken to minimize negative impacts generated by proposed development. Any proposed development in the project area would need to be reviewed for consistency with the AUAR and Mitigation Plan. If a development plan is not consistent with these documents or other statutory requirements, the developer may need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the AUAR. Natural and cultural inventory information in the AUAR and the Mitigation Plan will be used to guide development. Design and construction would proceed only after all approvals and appropriate agreements are complete. In December 2003, the City completed an AUAR for 620 acres of property located in the 2005 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). This study provides a framework for making decisions, including budgeting for improvements and providing a base of knowledge for development in this area. An AUAR is authorized under Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3610 as an alternative form of environmental review for development projects. Generally, the AUAR consists of a most likely development scenario, an inventory of environmental and cultural resources, an assessment of the "cumulative" impacts that the development scenario may have on these resources as well as public infrastructure services, and a set of mitigation measures that reduce or eliminate the potential impacts generated by the development. The AUAR is intended to address the "cumulative" impacts resulting from a sequence of related development projects. An AUAR is used as a tool to help parties interested in development within the project area understand the existing environmental and cultural resources present on a site prior to initiating detailed planning and design. It is also used to identify key initiatives that must or should be undertaken to minimize negative impacts generated by proposed development. Any proposed development in the project area would need to be reviewed for consistency with the AUAR and Mitigation Plan. If a development plan is not consistent with these documents or other statutory Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 6of31 requirements, the developer may need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the AUAR. Natural and cultural inventory information in the AUAR and the Mitigation Plan will be used to guide development. Design and construction would proceed only after all approvals and appropriate agreements are complete. In August 2005, the City completed a feasibility study for the 2005 MUSA area. This study identified infrastructure needs to service this area and identify costs to construct this infrastructure. The study also proposed assessments to benefiting property owners for these infrastructure costs. At about this same time, TH 212 was also being designed and eventually constructed. Infrastructure improvements that benefited the 2005 MUSA area were constructed at this time. These infrastructure improvements included tum lanes, signal system improvements, trunk watermain and trunk storm sewer improvements. In 2002 MnDOT and Jeurissen executed a temporary driveway access under the TH 212 land bridge to Pioneer Trail until such time the property develops and permanent access is provided. After the property develops, the temporary MnDOT driveway access was planned to be removed. Many property owner meetings were held for the AUAR, 2005 MUSA feasibility study and TH 212 improvements. Town and Country Homes had title to the Jeurissen property at this time and the City was working with this developer on coordinating future infrastructure improvement needs. ASSESSMENTS In January 2005, the City assessed the 2005 MUSA for benefiting infrastructure improvements associated with the TH 212 project constructed by MnDOT. In October 2005, the City assessed the 2005 MUSA for trunk watermain, sanitary sewer roadway and bridge improvements for future development of this area. The City took the lead on this project because the infrastructure improvements crossed several properties. In January 2007, the City assessed the 2005 MUSA for construction of the east/west collector roadway and additional trunk watermain and sanitary sewer. Again, the City took the lead on these infrastructure improvements since the improvements crossed several properties. Assessments were levied per parcel acreage less right- of-way and less known wetland areas. This assessment was consistent for parcels in the 2005 MUSA. Sometime after all the infrastructure improvements were made (the Jeurissen property had Town and Country Homes as the title owner), the title was transferred back to Mr. Bruce Jeurissen along with the assessments. Access to the Jeurissen property from the north will need to cross two properties to access Bluff Creek Boulevard. A small outlot was extracted from the 2nd Addition of the Pioneer Pass Development in 2011 to plan for the roadway improvements to the Jeurissen property. The Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 7 of 31 preliminary plat for The Preserve at Bluff Creek also plats the right-of-way for future access to the Jeurissen property. However, the right-of-way needed in the Preserve at Bluff Creek development for access to the Jeurissen property is currently not platted because the developer has chosen not to plat this area right now. The City's development contract for The Preserve at Bluff Creek does state this right-of-way shall be platted to facilitate the future development of the Jeurissen property. The City plans on having the developer plat this area when the next phase of this development is considered for approval. It is anticipated the next phase of The Preserve at Bluff Creek will come in for final plat in the next few months. City staff continues to meet with representatives from MnDOT, the Jeurissen property, and the Preserve at Bluff Creek development to try to resolve access and development timing issues. 2005 MUSA Expansion Project No. 04-05 Original Assessment (Just Jeurissen Property) Road: $ 96,328.76 Water: $ 22,074.96 Sewer: $ 43,374.20 Total: $161,777.92* *Assessments are fully paid off as of 12/31/12. Trunk Highway 101/Lyman Boulevard — TH 312/TH 212 Original Assessment Road: $39,232.34 Water: $45,545.84 Total: $84,778.18* *Assessments are fully paid off as of 12/31/12. Bluff Creek Boulevard Imnrovements Original Assessment Road: $514,238.68 Water: $ 26,091.64 Sewer: $ 60,882.33 Total: $601,212.65* *No payments have been received because the property has Green Acre status (outstanding amount with interest is: $667,834.02 as of 12/31/12). Total Assessments (For Just the Jeurissen Pro Roads: $649,799.78 Water: $ 93,712.44 Sewer: $104,256.53 Total: $847,768.75* *Does not include interest Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 8 of 31 2005 MUSA Area i p 1116�� 1 Ar �•� nu. rBluff Creek 7final .�Boulevard L_t� Q u O �arir . ' 'I' 4' `�'♦� I' t f required I,%, / ; .�� �'-- �- -- /� "The IF preliminary plat IN �.= not yet acquired ti �... ., .��, .�IMOM L F. REZONING Justification for Rezoning to PUD The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 24 acres from A-2, Agricultural Estate to PUD -R, Planned Unit Development -Residential. The project consists of 58 units in 32 single- family homes and 26 twinhomes. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. For a property guided Medium Density Residential, zoning consistent with the land use includes RLM, Residential Low and Medium Density District, R-8, Mixed Medium Density Residential Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 9 of 31 District or PUD -R, Planned Unit Development — Residential. Since the developer wanted a development of single-family detached and twinhome units, the R-8 district did not work because it does not permit single-family detached homes. Initially, the developer tried to use the RLM district, however, due to site topography and the location of the Bluff Creek overlay district, the developer could not meet the minimum standards for the lots and many lot width and area variances would have been required. Since the PUD -R district creates its own standards, we were able to accommodate the development while preserving significant environmental features. Since the property is guided medium density residential, the developer must maintain a minimum density of 4.0 units per acre. As proposed, the net density of the project is 4.03 units per acre. Complying with the RLM district regulations would not have permitted the development consistent with the land use plan. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to allow for lot dimension flexibility and the mixing of housing type. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more -sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development and is consistent with the comprehensive plan subject to the conditions of approval. The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. The proposed rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life -cycle. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 10 of 31 • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards govern the development of the property. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Camden Ridge a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a single-family detached and twinhome development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more -sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Camden Ridge development standards, the development must comply with the Residential Low and Medium Density District, RLM. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to single- family detached houses and twinhomes and their ancillary uses. The type of uses to be provided on common area shall be low -intensity neighborhood -oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include a bus shelter, development signage, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter, permanent open space, playground equipment and trails. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet Exterior Perimeter Lot Lines 50 feet Front Yard 25 feet Front Yard (side street) 20 feet Side Yard: garage side and house side 7.5 feet (minimum separation between buildings is 15 feet Rear Yard 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 35%* Bluff Creek Primary zone bound (BCO) 40 feet with the first 20 feet as buffer Minimum Lot Dimensions Standards Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18,2013 Page 11 of 31 Single-family detached area 9,000 square feet Single-family detached lot width 70 feet 75 feet in shoreland district Sin a-famil detached lot depth) 130 feet Twinhome lot (area per unit) 5,100 square feet Twinhome lot (lot width) 32 feet Twinhome lot (lot depth) 120 feet The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 35 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 35 percent site coverage. Lots within the shoreland district may not exceed 25 percent site coverage. Lot coverage may not exceed those established in the compliance table. SUBDIVISION REVIEW The developer is proposing two different subdivisions. The initial plat, Jeurissen I" Addition, will create four outlots. The area north of Bluff Creek (Outlot A) is being preliminary platted into blocks and lots for residential development known as Camden Ridge. The area south of Bluff Creek is being platted into three outlots. One of these outlots (Outlot B) contains areas of wetlands, bluffs and Bluff Creek and is definitely within the Bluff Creek primary zone. The other outlot (Outlot C) is presumed to be located within the primary zone, but additional evaluation is necessary to determine this. This outlot may not be developable or accessible in the future. The third outlot (Outlot D) contains the existing driveway access to the property. Staff believes that these outlots should be preserved as permanent open space. The area north of Bluff Creek, Camden Ridge, is being subdivided into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 7 outlotsi 6 e _ �i 1 AC � e ,xN Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 12 of 31 SHORELAND REGULATIONS That portion of the property within 300 feet of Bluff Creek is considered to be within the Shoreland Management District and is subject to the standards and requirements of Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and City Code. The intent of the shoreland rules are to protect the habitat, viewscape and water quality of the waters of the state by setting design standards to this end. However, unlike riparian lots for lakes, there are no minimum lot widths or areas for riparian lots of streams/rivers; rather, the lot dimensions are subject to the underlying zoning requirements. Other design standards apply to these lots. Structures must be setback 50 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL) and low floor elevations must be three (3) feet above the flood of record. If the flood stage elevation is unknown, the stream can either be modeled to predict the flood stage post development or the OHWL may be used. The development must comply with the MN Rules Chapter 6120 and the DNR must issue their concurrence to this effect. An adequate stormwater management and erosion/sediment control plan must be provided. These will be addressed under a separate heading. Based on the DNR Residential PUD "Base" Density evaluation (section 6120.3800, subp. 5. A.), 4-7 28 homes could be located within the shoreland area of the development. Sixteen units are proposed within the shoreland district. This density is calculated by dividing the area within the shoreland district by the single residential lot width standards times the tier depth. The area within the sboreland district is 462,000 758,802 square feet. The lot width times the tier depth is 27,000. Also within the shoreland district, impervious surface of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the lot area. The total proposed impervious surface of the land area within the shoreland district is 17.9 percent, which complies with this standard. Additionally, DNR regulations (section 6120.3800, subp. 5. B. (2) (a)) require that "at least 50 percent of the total project area within the shoreland district, which extends 300 feet out from the edge of the creek, must be preserved as open space". Given that the total property area within the shoreland district is 17.884197 acres, 813 8.71 acres would be required to be preserved as permanent open space. Outlot B, Jeurissen 0 Addition (7.6 acres), plus part of Outlot B, Outlot C, Outlot F and Outlot G, Camden Ridge, plus the buffer areas of the lots adjacent to the Bluff Creek primary zone provide the required open space. The open space shall be established as part of the first phase of the development. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 13 of 31 WETLANDS A wetland delineation was performed, reviewed and approved in the fall of 2012. The existing conditions plan appears to accurately depict the wetland boundary. No wetland impacts are proposed as part of the design. The wetland is contained within the Bluff Creek Overlay District so the buffer protection will be coincidental to the protection of the Primary Zone. EASEMENTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS The Camden Ridge development will connect to Bluff Creek Boulevard. The right-of-way for that connecting road must be acquired. Preserve Connection � -•ate. �— • 1 � Bluff Creek Overlay Setback r ��• Outlot C p Use to be cunni e wnor C Outlot B determined PUD required 50% open space PISNGGRev,.,;q WETLANDS A wetland delineation was performed, reviewed and approved in the fall of 2012. The existing conditions plan appears to accurately depict the wetland boundary. No wetland impacts are proposed as part of the design. The wetland is contained within the Bluff Creek Overlay District so the buffer protection will be coincidental to the protection of the Primary Zone. EASEMENTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS The Camden Ridge development will connect to Bluff Creek Boulevard. The right-of-way for that connecting road must be acquired. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 14 of 31 The proposed "Easement Detail" must be revised to include how the easements around the perimeter of the twinhome lots will be platted. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Note: A development contract is being approved in conjunction with the preliminary plat to permit site grading to commence prior to final plat approval. However, before the developer may proceed with site grading, the access easement or road right-of-way must be in place. Bluff Creek flows through the property from west to east. The existing drainage on the northwest corner of the development drains into an existing retaining pond before discharging to Bluff Creek. The majority of the property's surface water runoff drains to Bluff Creek. The eastern section of the property drains into the TH 212 ditch system, and the northeast corer of the property drains northeast into a wetland. The proposed drainage would divert storm water to the existing retaining pond and three new ponds, before the water leaves the site. Pond 1 and Pond 2 would discharge water to Bluff Creek. Pond 3 would discharge water into the TH 212 ditch system. The developer has provided a storm water report which shows that this storm water management plan will comply with the City's standards. The grading plan shows a steep slope on the proposed trail near Outlot F. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail so that it will meet ADA standards. The contours near the northwest corner of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7, must be smoothed out. Between lots on the north side of Street B, the current plan shows that water may be flowing laterally from one lot into the adjacent lot. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) to show water will drain away from the structures. The final plans must note the survey benchmark on the plan set and note the existing and proposed elevations at the comers of each lot. An escrow totaling $105,376.87 (110% of the estimated erosion control for this development) is required before site grading begins. It is more efficient and cost effective to minimize the number of inlets into a stormwater best management practice. The current plan will result in five inlets into water quality basin #4 and three inlets into water quality basin #2. The applicant or their engineer must make efforts to Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 15 of 31 minimize the number of inlets into each pond to the greatest extent possible. It is preferred that only one inlet into each pond be constructed. If this is not possible, adequate explanation must be provided as to why this cannot happen. Construction costs alone are not adequate as the city will bear the cost of long-term maintenance of all proposed structures. Section 19-144 requires that storm water ponds which drain directly to Bluff Creek are constructed with a forebay which provides up to 15% of the permanent pool surface area. This forebay shall have a minimum depth of three (3) feet plus sediment storage. Portions of Block 1 and Block 5 are counter to this directive. The applicant must evaluate if the end goal can be accomplished without the proposed disturbance. Further, Section 20-1564 requires that the applicant "submit a detailed plan identifying the resources that will be disturbed and a corresponding restoration and/or mitigation plan". Based upon review of the current plans, access to maintenance of water quality basins #1, #3 and #4 appears problematic. The plans must provide for access to all pond elements that will require maintenance. This includes, among other elements, all inlets, outlets, infiltration benches and associated infrastructure, forebay dredging and main pond dredging. This access must be shown on the plan set. Bluff Creek is impaired for turbidity and fish indices of biologic integrity. It is known, through the Total Maximum Daily Load plan (TMDL) currently being reviewed by the US Environmental Protection Agency, that flow is a significant contributor to both impairments. The flow contributes in two ways. First, as hard surface is increased and the time of concentration is decreased, greater quantities of water are delivered to Bluff Creek in an increasingly compressed time frame. This "flashiness" of flows has significant erosive force and increases to delivery of sediment to and within the channel. The other way flow contributes to the impairment is by an overall reduction in base flows within Bluff Creek which leaves the creek with inadequate water volumes to sustain a healthy population of aquatic flora and fauna. This decrease in base flow is also a result of increasing hardcover, as a decrease in infiltration results in more water running off the sight as the flow flashes, and less water being slow introduced through shallow ground water stream channel interaction. Because of the findings of the TMDL and Section 19-144, the storm water facilities must be designed to infiltrate or otherwise abstract surface water runoff to the extent practicable and extended detention must be provided. Section 19-144 also requires that post -development downstream flow conditions are evaluated. The proposed filtration benches are an acceptable storm water best management practice. More detail on the design will be needed but city staff and the applicant or their representative can work together on this design. It may be possible to incorporate iron filings into the filtration benches to aid in the removal of dissolved phosphorous. The city has iron filings which they could make available to the applicant or their contractor. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 16 of 31 RETAINING WALLS The developer proposes three retaining walls on this site. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. Retaining Wall A runs parallel to River Rock Drive and will be located on Outlot A. It is 420 feet long and has a maximum height of 9 feet. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. Retaining Wall B is located between River Rock Drive and Street B. It runs along the back lot lines of the houses that front River Rock Drive. Retaining Wall B is 287 feet long and has a maximum height of 3 feet. This retaining wall must be moved so that it is not in the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. Retaining Wall C runs parallel to the northwestern edge of Pond 3. It is 122 feet long with a maximum height of 2 feet. A Homeowners Association must be created to take ownership of all retaining walls and the draintile along the face of Retaining Wall B. Surface Water Management Fees Surface Water Management trunk storm sewer fees are collected with each subdivision. The fee is based upon buildable land area and is intended to be scalar according to potential surface water runoff contribution. The fee for this development was estimated with the following assumptions. • That outlots C, E and G would not be assessed as they are used expressly for stormwater best management practices. • That the net density of the site is 4.03 units/acre — medium density • That the stormwater best management practices constructed for this project will receive and treat 16.05 acres of watershed. • The assessable land is 17.05 acres. The tnmk fee is divided into water quality and water quantity. The fees are calculated as follows: BASE FEE ACRES TOTAL WATER QUANTITY 1 $5590 17.05 $90,309.50 WATER QUALITY 1 $2830 17.05 $58,251.50 TOTAL $143,561.00 Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 17 of 31 Credits are given to water quality at a multiplier of one-half the water quality base fee times the number of acres treated with the facilities constructed. In this case the credit would equal: $2830/acres(0.5)'16.05acres = $22,710.75 In addition, a credit of $2500 is given for each skimmer structure installed. It is assumed that three will be constructed granting another $7,500.00 credit bringing the total credit to $30,210.75. The estimated SWMP trunk fee due at the final plat is $113,350.25. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL A Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required as part of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Permit. This SWPPP must be provided to the city for review and comment. Generally speaking, the erosion control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of city code and the NPDES permit. City staff will provide redline comments to the applicant or their engineer specific to the plan when the SWPPP and all applicable elements are provided. STREETS The developer proposes to construct 31 -foot wide local streets throughout the development. Local streets must be within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way. Streets A and B will be 90 -foot diameter cul-de-sacs within 120 -foot wide right-of-way. At final plat, the Engineering Department will review the profile of Street A between stations 2+00 and 4+00 to ensure the profile meets the minimum length requirements for vertical curves. The proposed centerline grade at the intersection of River Rock Drive and Street A must not exceed 3%. The existing driveway for this property connects to TH 212. This driveway access to TH 212 must be closed. River Rock Drive will provide access from Bluff Creek Boulevard. The developer must obtain the right-of-way needed to make that connection. According to City Code §18-57(k), a street terminating in a cul-de-sac cannot be longer than 800 feet. This site is bordered by TH 212 and Bluff Creek Boulevard, so an additional street connection is impractical. To comply with §18-57(k), Street C will act as an emergency access in the future. It will provide access to the north of the development in case of an emergency that could block access to Bluff Creek Boulevard via River Rock Drive. Street C is not intended to regularly carry traffic. It is 20 feet wide and is within 30 feet of right-of-way. The developer's engineer must design a Street C typical section. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 18 of 31 The development is adjacent to Bluff Creek Boulevard and is therefore subject to the arterial collector fee at the time of final plat. SANI'T'ARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN The developer proposes to construct new 8" PVC watermain that will connect to the existing 8" DIP watermain that is stubbed out from Bluff Creek Boulevard. SEH's watermain model shows that the watermain pressures would be high enough to cause surge pressures that could damage the system. To lower the water pressure and prevent potential damage by the water hammer effect, the developer's engineer must incorporate pressure reducing valves and surge protection system into the watermain plans. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBMH-102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. The developer proposes to construct new 8" PVC sanitary sewer that will connect to the existing 8" PVC sanitary sewer that is stubbed out from Bluff Creek Boulevard. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBMH-102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. ASSESSMENTS An assessment for Bluff Creek Boulevard improvements is outstanding for this property. The principal of $601,212.65 was deferred until development and it has been accruing 6% since 2009. As of June 6, 2013, the assessment amount due was $796,302.31. At the time of the final plat, this assessment plus the additional accrued interest must be paid or reassessed. Water and sewer hook-ups are due at the time of final plat. The hook-up fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PARKS AND OPEN SPACE The quality and number of recreational facilities in a community directly contributes to its quality of life. For this reason, the City of Chanhassen places a strong emphasis on parks and open space. As the City of Chanhassen has developed and increased in population, more pressure and attention has been given to providing recreational opportunities for our residents. Increased leisure time, health awareness, greater mobility, and high disposable incomes have all contributed to the increased demand for recreational activities. The challenge of the next century will be to provide facilities for a growing and diverse population. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 19 of 31 2013 Pioneer Pass Park - Phase 1 Construction $350000-ft&wd . WN BEPwegeEQwWg Berg Cmded. Pnue3itiede: >FrelWadeg >Borm Sewer Mpmwnm� >Pa ng bl >B.k Wl reurt %bftd l/Bxe W l FeB >Soar/lawse FINE >T.h >PWa . >Peng Adm >S Wbg Pioneer Pass Park 1/2 Mile Service Area Parks can be defined as public areas that provide active or passive -oriented recreational facilities. A significant characteristic of parkland is its accessibility to its users. Open space is any parcel that is not used for buildings or other structures and is left in a natural state. Parks and open space perform diverse functions: meet physical and psychological needs, enhance and protect the resource base, enhance real estate values, and provide a positive impact on economic development. COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN The city's comprehensive park plan calls for a neighborhood park to be located within one-half mile of every residence in the city. The proposed Camden Ridge development is located within the park service area of Pioneer Pass Park. Construction of the 8.7 -acre Pioneer Pass Park site is currently underway and Phase 1 of development is expected to be complete in 2014. COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN One of the most anticipated trail extensions within the city is the north/south Bluff Creek Corridor Pedestrian Trail that extends from Lyman Boulevard south to Pioneer Trail. The proposed Camden Ridge development is poised to complete this extension. The proposed development will construct a trail starting at the current southern terminus of the Bluff Creek Trail and extending south, stopping at a location north of TH 212. In order to complete a link to Pioneer Trail, the city would like to work with the applicant and property owner to extend the trail under the TH 212 bridge to a point connecting with the existing pedestrian trail along Pioneer Trail. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 20 of 31 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The applicant has provided a tree inventory and landscaping plan for the subdivision. Bufferyard plantings are required for this development along Highway 212. Tree preservation calculations for the development are shown below. The tree preservation plan did not include areas of removal along the southern grading limits. Staff has added this removal to the calculations. Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 25.2 ac. Total canopy area (excluding wetlands) 4.5 ac Baseline canopy coverage 17.9% Minimum canopy coverage allowed 20% or 5 ac Proposed tree preservation 8% or 2.2 ac The developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed. Additional plantings will be required to bring the baseline canopy coverage up to the minimum required. Required plantings (4.5 ac - 2.2)x1.2 (5.0 ac - 4.5) 130 trees 110 trees required 20 trees required The applicant has proposed a total of 129 trees in the landscape plan. The applicant will be required to plant a minimum of 130. The applicant is required to provide bufferyards along Highway 212. The minimum plantings required and the applicant's proposed quantities are shown in the table below. The applicant needs to increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. Additionally, the applicant shall revise the plant schedule in order to meet ordinance standards that state no one species will comprise of more than one third of the total number of trees. The applicant has proposed that over 37% of the proposed trees be Black Hills spruce. The applicant has not specified on the landscape plan how Outlots A, B and C will be re - vegetated after grading. The applicant shall specify seeding or sodding plans for the outlots. The applicant is proposing to remove trees outside the grading limits. Staff recommends that these trees be preserved and protected during construction. The trees are identified at #1301, 1302, and 1303. All are oaks and are located along the north property line. Required Proposed 19 overstory trees 15 overstory trees East property line - Hwy 212, bufferyard B, 980' 39 understory trees 38 understory trees 58 shrubs 0 shrubs The applicant needs to increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. Additionally, the applicant shall revise the plant schedule in order to meet ordinance standards that state no one species will comprise of more than one third of the total number of trees. The applicant has proposed that over 37% of the proposed trees be Black Hills spruce. The applicant has not specified on the landscape plan how Outlots A, B and C will be re - vegetated after grading. The applicant shall specify seeding or sodding plans for the outlots. The applicant is proposing to remove trees outside the grading limits. Staff recommends that these trees be preserved and protected during construction. The trees are identified at #1301, 1302, and 1303. All are oaks and are located along the north property line. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 21 of 31 MISCELLANEOUS Demolition permits are required for the removal of any existing structures. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. The applicant and or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. Temporary street signs must be installed prior to home construction. No burning permits will be issued. Any trees removed must either be chipped on site or removed from site. Water mains shall be made serviceable prior to combustible construction. Posts, fences, utility boxes etc. shall not be placed near fire hydrants which would hinder firefighters to quickly located and/or operate fire hydrants in a safe manner. The developer shall prepare a noise analysis for noise that will be generated by traffic on Highway 212. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which shall be implemented by the developer. COMPLIANCE TABLE Area Width Depth Maximum (sq. ft.) (ft) (ft) Hardcover Notes (sq. ft. Single -Family 9,000 70 130 35%* BCO location and setbacks Ll Bl 12,765 90 133 4,606 must be determined#, Shoreland L2 Bl 13,129 90 146 4,606 Shoreland L3 Bl 10,451 75 132 4,606 LA Bl 10,922 75 133 4,606 Comer lot L5 Bl 12,272 90 135 4,606 Shoreland L6 Bl 14,049 90 154 4,606 Shoreland L7 Bl 15,384 90 156 4,606 1 Shoreland L8 Bl 18,895 90 141 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L9 Bl 16,684 90 144 4,606 Shoreland, BCO Planning Commission Camden Ridge - Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 22 of 31 Area Width Depth Maximum (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Hardcover Notes (sq. ft. L10 B1 20,388 90 138 4,606 Shoreland, BCO Lll B1 14,733 108 132 4,606 Shoreland, Comer lot L12 B1 18,942 93 206 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L13 B1 16,207 109 176 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L14 B1 14,286 128 150 4,606 Shoreland, BCO Ll B2 9,902 75 132 3,984 Corner lot L2 B2 10,007 76 133 3,984 L3 B2 10,443 75 138 3,984 L4 B2 10,934 85 141 3,984 L5 B2 11,235 87 145 3,984 L6 B2 11,492 91 148 3,984 L7 B2 11,344 95 144 3,984 L8 B2 10,528 78 140 3,984 L9 B2 10,434 73 135 3,984 L10 B2 10,802 71 132 3,984 Ll l B2 10,106 73 130 3,984 L12 B2 10,025 78 134 3,984 L13 B2 10,463 85 133 3,984 Corner lot Ll B5 14,702 124 145 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L2 B5 13,935 90 143 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L3 B5 14,018 90 145 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L4 B5 13,944 100 150 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L5 B5 16,513 90 181 4,606 Shoreland, MENEW-1 7w- 01 BCO Twin Home 5,100 32 120 BCO, Ll B3 17,363 77 160 3,051 Perimeter, Corner lot L2 B3 6,813 43 160 3,051 Perimeter Planning Commission Camden Ridge - Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 23 of 31 -T Area (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Maximum Hardcover (sq. ft. Notes L3 B3 6,787 42 160 3,051 Perimeter L4 B3 8,224 35 162 3,051 Perimeter L5 B3 9,716 33 178 3,051 Perimeter L6 B3 10,235 33 180 3,051 Perimeter L7 B3 8,703 32 165 3,051 Perimeter L8 B3 6,813 42 160 3,051 Perimeter L9 B3 6,787 42 160 3,051 Perimeter L10 B3 7,141 41 160 3,051 Perimeter Ll l B3 8,861 33 167 3,051 Perimeter L12 B3 10,751 32 192 3,051 Perimeter L13 B3 11,720 38 217 3,051 Perimeter L14 B3 9,411 43 221 3,051 Perimeter L15 B3 5,584 42 132 3,051 L16 B3 8,783 83 140 3,051 Comer lot Ll B4 5,222 42 124 3,051 L2 B4 5,305 47 124 3,051 L3 B4 6,262 66 128 3,051 L4 B4 7,314 78 138 3,051 L5 B4 8,331 94 134 3,051 L6 B4 5,928 64 126 3,051 L7 B4 7,798 85 127 3,051 L8 B4 5,174 43 126 3,051 L9 B4 5,147 43 125 3,051 L10 B4 Outlot A 7,803 70 122 3,051 Corner lot 86,064 1.97 ac., ens ace Outlot B 16,734 38 ac., 0.Open s ace Outlot C 37,317 0.85 ac., Storm water pond Outlot D 8,736 0.2 ac.,Trail Outlot E 29,787 0.68 ac., Storm water and Outlot F 4,312 0.099 ac., Trail Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 24 of 31 #The boundaries of the Bluff Creek primary zone must be determined for Lot 1, Block 1. *Hard cover may be averaged over the entire PUD. Individual lots may exceed the hard cover percentage. The developer has calculated the total hard cover for the project including roads, trails, sidewalks and individual lots subject to the maximum hard cover per lot in the above table. Based on this analysis, total hard cover is 34.8 percent over the northern portion of the development, within the guidelines of the PUD -R. Within the shoreland district, the total hardcover is 17.9 percent, which complies with the maximum hard cover in the shoreland district. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A conditional use permit shall be issued by the city for all subdivisions, site plans and prior to the erection or alteration of any building or land within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district. BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT In 1996, the City completed the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (BCWNRMP). This plan recognized the unique qualities of this Area Width Depth Maximum (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Hardcover Notes (sq. ft. 0.59 ac., Outlot G 25,716 Storm water pond ROW 201,204 4.62 ac. 7.63 ac., BCO Outlot B 332,446 Bluff Creek prunary zone 5.01 ac., BCO Outlot C 218,301 Bluff Creek Corridor 0.43 ac., BCO Outlot D 18,815 Driveway from Pioneer Trail TOTAL 1,-568,388 36.0 acres #The boundaries of the Bluff Creek primary zone must be determined for Lot 1, Block 1. *Hard cover may be averaged over the entire PUD. Individual lots may exceed the hard cover percentage. The developer has calculated the total hard cover for the project including roads, trails, sidewalks and individual lots subject to the maximum hard cover per lot in the above table. Based on this analysis, total hard cover is 34.8 percent over the northern portion of the development, within the guidelines of the PUD -R. Within the shoreland district, the total hardcover is 17.9 percent, which complies with the maximum hard cover in the shoreland district. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A conditional use permit shall be issued by the city for all subdivisions, site plans and prior to the erection or alteration of any building or land within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district. BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT In 1996, the City completed the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (BCWNRMP). This plan recognized the unique qualities of this Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18,2013 Page 25 of 31 corridor and the opportunities it provided. The intent was to protect a natural corridor from the source to the convergence with the Minnesota River that would allow for wildlife migration, habitat protection, green space preservation, recreational opportunities, educational opportunities, protection of the bluff areas from erosion, and protection of the water quality of Bluff Creek. Site design which is sensitive to the existing natural resources is the primary method for protecting the Bluff Creek corridor. To this end the plan created the Bluff Creek Overlay District through ordinance number 286 in December of 1998 which was codified Article XXXI, Chapter 20. Much of the property lies within the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOR). It appears that this is accurately reflected on the existing conditions plan and elsewhere within the plan set. Efforts must be made to avoid grading within the secondary zone where practicable to do so. Where it is not practicable to do so, a detailed restoration plan will be required. Section 20-1564 requires that all structures be setback from the primary zone of the BCOR a minimum of forty (40) feet. It also stipulates that no disturbance may occur in the first twenty (20) feet of the setback. Portions of Block 1 and Block 5 are counter to this directive. The applicant must evaluate if the end goal can be accomplished without the proposed disturbance. Further, Section 20-1564 requires that the applicant "submit a detailed plan identifying the resources that will be disturbed and a corresponding restoration and/or mitigation plan". Section 20-1561 states that one of the intended purposes of the BCOR is "the creation of a greenway connecting Lake Minnewashta Regional Park and the Minnesota River Valley. The greenway will serve as an uninterrupted pedestrian trail, bikeway system, and wildlife corridor affording opportunities for recreation, education, physical fitness and non -motorized transportation". This must be balanced with the protection of Bluff Creek and the natural resources within the corridor. To this end, the trail should be aligned such that it maximizes the setback distance from Bluff Creek and the flood plain wetlands and avoids the loss of natural vegetation. By aligning the trail closer to the back lot lines, the trail itself will act to delineate the Bluff Creek Overlay District and protect the area from potential encroachment. Signage must also be placed to demarcate the corridor. The placement shown on the preliminary erosion control plan, and elsewhere throughout the plan set, is adequate. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. Grading activities have been observed within this area along the south side of Bluff Creek. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Any such areas that have been disturbed through the removal or addition of soils material prior to approval shall be addressed prior to commencement of other grading activities but no later than seven (7) days from approval. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 26 of 31 The property owner is proposing to hold Outlot C, Jeurissen I" Addition for potential future development. In the interim, the property owner must advise the city of the intended use of the property as well as how it shall be accessed. The City's Bluff Creek Primary Zone map shows this land as being within the primary zone boundaries, which is prima facie evidence of the location and type of watershed zone. The property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary. The community development director shall make a determination to maintain the officially designated watershed zone boundary or if the boundaries need to be corrected on city plans and maps based upon the data that is supplied. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the development subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Buildine Conditions: 1. Demolition permits are required for the removal of any existing structures. 2. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 4. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 5. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 6. The applicant and/or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. 7. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 27 of 31 Engineering Conditions: 1. The developer must obtain right-of-way for the part of River Rock Road that connects to Bluff Creek Boulevard. 2. The proposed "Easement Detail" must be revised to include how the easements around the perimeter of the twinhome lots will be platted. 3. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail near Outlot F so that it will meet ADA standards. 4. The contours near the northwest corner of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7 must be smoothed out. 5. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) between lots on the north side of Street B to show the grading will allow water to drain away from the structures. 6. The final plans must note the survey benchmark on the plan set. 7. The final plans must note the existing and proposed elevations at the comers of each lot. 8. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. 9. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 10. Retaining Wall B must be moved so that it is outside the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. 11. A Homeowners Association must be created to take ownership of all retaining walls and the draintile along the face of Retaining Wall B. 12. Local streets must be within a 60 -foot wide right-of-way. 13. At final plat, the Engineering Department will review the profile of Street A between stations 2+00 and 4+00 to ensure the profile meets the minimum length requirements for vertical curves. 14. The proposed centerline grade at the intersection of River Rock Drive and Street A must not be greater than 3%. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 28 of 31 15. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed. 16. The developer's engineer must design a Street C typical section. 17. The development is adjacent to Bluff Creek Boulevard and is therefore subject to the arterial collector fee at the time of final plat. 18. The developer's engineer must incorporate pressure -reducing valves and a surge protection system into the watermain plans. 19. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBMH-102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. 20. At the time of final plat, the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements assessment must be paid or reassessed. 21. Water and sewer hook-up fees must be paid at the time of final plat. Fire Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. Temporary street signs must be installed prior to home construction. 3. No burning permits will be issued. Any trees removed must either be chipped on site or removed from site. 4. Water mains shall be made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Posts, fences, utility boxes etc. shall not be placed near fire hydrants which would hinder firefighters to quickly locate and/or operate fire hydrants in a safe manner. Natural Resources Conditions: 1. The applicant shall increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. 2. The applicant shall plant a minimum of 130 trees in the development. 3. The applicant shall diversify the plant schedule so that no one species comprises more than one third of the total number of trees. 4. The applicant shall specify vegetation proposed for Outlots A, B and C. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 29 of 31 5. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to the city prior to final approval. 6. The applicant shall preserve trees 41301, 1302, 1303. These trees along with trees #1393- 1398 shall be protected by fencing prior to and during any grading or construction activities. 7. The developer shall install signage at lot lines to demarcate the Bluff Creek Primary Zone. Parks Conditions: 1. Full park dedication fees shall be collected per city ordinance in lieu of requiring parkland dedication. 2. Construction of Bluff Creek Trail from its current southerly terminus, extending between the new homes and Bluff Creek to a terminus point at TH 212. The developer shall provide design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the "Bluff Creek Trail." All construction documents, including material costs, shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be 10 feet in width, surfaced with asphalt and constructed to meet all city specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for the cost of the aggregate base, asphalt surfacing, and storm water systems utilized to construct the trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials noted. Labor and installation, design, engineering and testing services are not reimbursable expenses. Planning Conditions: The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as its portion of the 2005 AUAR prior to recording the final plat. 2. The developer shall prepare a noise analysis for noise generated by traffic on Highway 212. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which shall be implemented by the developer. 3. Dedication of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone shall be made to the city or a eenser,vation preservation easement shall be established over said outlot(s). 4. The property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, Jeurissen I" Addition. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 30 of 31 5. The property owner must advise the city of the intended use of Outlot C, Jeurissen 1" Addition, and how it shall be accessed. This Outlot may not be developable or accessible in the future. 6. Final plat approval will be contingent on the developer resolving the access issue. Either an access easement or right-of-way must be in place prior to any site development. Individual lots may not exceed the maximum hard cover per lot established in the compliance table. Water Resources Conditions: Land disturbance within the first twenty feet of the Bluff Creek Overlay District setback shall not be allowed unless the applicant can demonstrate that the goal cannot be achieved without the proposed disturbance. 2. A mitigation/restoration plan must be provided for any disturbance within the Bluff Creek Overlay District or setback from the BCOR. 3. Trail must be aligned to minimize the encroachment into the BCOR primary zone and minimize loss of natural vegetation and habitat. 4. Efforts must be made to minimize the number of inlets into each pond. 5. The proposed ponds must be designed with a forebay. 6. The plans must demonstrate how water quality basin #1 and water quality basin #3 will be accessed. This includes all inlets, outlets and filtration benches as well as sediment removal from forebay and water quality volume. 7. The stormwater design shall, to the greatest extent practicable, seek to maximize infiltration, extend detention times and protect Bluff Creek from scour and other erosive conditions. 8. The applicant must evaluate downstream flow conditions as indicated in Section 19-144. 9. A Surface Water Pollution Plan and all required elements must be provided to the city for review. This plan must be compliant with NPDES requirements as well as the requirements of Chapter 19 of city code. 10. SWMP trunk fees due at final plat are estimated to be $113,350.25. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 31 of 31 11. The development must comply with the MN Rules chapter 6120 and the DNR must issue their concurrence to this effect. 12. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. Grading activities have been observed within this area along the south side of Bluff Creek. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Any such areas that have been disturbed through the removal or addition of soils material prior to approval shall be addressed prior to commencement of other grading activities but no later than seven (7) days from approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Ordinance Rezoning to PUD -R for Camden Ridge. 3. Development Review Application. 4. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Cover Sheet. 5. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Existing Conditions. 6. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Plat. 7. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Site Plan. 8. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Overall Grading. 9. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Grading Plan. 10. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Grading Plan. 11. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Erosion Control. 12. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Sanitary Sewer & Water. 13. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Sanitary Sewer & Water. 14. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Storm Water. 15. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Storm Water. 16. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Landscape Plan. 17. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Tree Preservation Plan. 18. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Tree Preservation Plan. 19. Reduced Copy Jeurissen 1' Addition. 20. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary PUD Impervious Coverage. 21. City of Chanhassen Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements Final Assessment Roll. 22. City of Chanhassen Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements Exhibit 1. 23. Letter from Michael J. Corbett (MnDOT) to Robert Generous dated June 7, 2013. 24. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. g:�plan\2013 planning cases12013-13 camden ridge\stafr report cattden tidge.doc 14) OF TO Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 June 7, 2013 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner 7700 Market Blvd City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Camden Ridge MnDOT Review # P13-025 North of US 212, west of Powers Blvd Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1013 Dear Mr. Generous, RECEIVED JUN 13 2013 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Thank you for the opportunity to review the above referenced plat. MnDOT has reviewed the plat and has the following comment: Water Resources: MnDOT does not allow an increase in storm water discharge to MnDOT right-of-way. Please submit documents specified below with a drainage permit application: 1. Final drainage plan showing storm sewer plan, storm sewer and culvert profiles and pond contours 2. Existing and proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows 3. Existing and proposed drainage/pond computations for the 2, 10, and 100 year rainfall events Please direct any questions regarding water resources to Hailu Shekur (651-234-7521 or hailu.shekur@state.mn.us of MnDOT Metro District's Water Resources Section. Permits: As previously stated, a drainage permit is required. Additionally, any use of or work within or affecting MnDOT Right-of-way and/or utilities requires a permit. A short form permit is required for the utilities that are connected within MnDOT Right-of-way. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's permit website at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/permits/. Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-234-7911 or buck.craig_(a)state.mn.us) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf. version of the plans. MnDOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us provided that each separate e- mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: MnDOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disc. 4. Plans can also be submitted to MnDOT's External FTP Site. Please send files to: 1%://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/incoming/MetroWatersEdge/Planning Internet Explorer doesn't work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to mctrodevreviews.dotnastate.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. If you have any questions concerning this review, please feel free to contact me at (651) 234-7793. Sincerely, / Michael J. Corbett, PE Senior Planner Copy sent via E -Mail: Diane Langenbach, Area Engineer Hailu Shekur, Water Resources Nancy Jacobson, Design Buck Craig, Permits Becky Parzyck, Right -of -Way Dave Torfin, Survey David Sheen, Traffic Engineering Clare Lackey, Traffic Engineering Ann Braden, Metropolitan Council Carver County, MN Dis mwam . ThismapwasoreatadusmgCarverCounty''sGe mphlc Map Scale N barious onSystems(GIS),itisa informationanda from n boeThis 1 Inch = 633 feet vadoua Ciry,Coasm State, antl Federal Federal offices, map not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended b be used as a wE reference. CarverCounty isnot responsiblefor any maccuraaes Map Date contained herein. 5/20/2013 S Date: May 21, 2013 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Boa 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department Review Response Deadline: June 7.2013 By: Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner Subject: CAMDEN RIDGE —Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of approximately 24 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 7 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Property is located at 1500 Pioneer Trail (see location map). Applicant: Lennar. Owner: Bruce Jeurissen Planning Case: 2013-13 PID: 25-0232300 The above-described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on May 17, 2013. The 60 -day review period ends July 16, 2013. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and pro- posed future utility services, stone water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on June 18, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than June 7, 2013. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept, of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 7. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 8. Telephone Company (CenturyLink) 9. Electric Company (Xcel Energy) 10. Mediacom 11. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco Camden Ridge Planning Case #2013-13 Location 1506 Pioneer Trail 6/18/2013 l UW !L( �« tll0, 1�c�-,O c�LesS EMMON -- "°cpusa` Suninte�ti° • ;Rezoning from A-2 to PUD -R • Subdivision Review • Conditional Use Permit Existing Conditions r tF y 'y* v , i•✓ ••t '., c A ~ •AUAR • Assessments • Access • Bluff Creek Corridor and Primary Zone • PUD Open Space Requirement, DNR • Shoreland Distrito • Property Owner must provide data and analysis regarding the primary zone boundary on Outlot C Jeurissen t" Addition parcel and address access and use. `lr he,w, WZY 6/18/2013 Q--, b, r- 2JZ. T� � , ,"1 Q d _ �V �• kt �jt,St. (�'i »'u-,•� — �..�i..r"h..ct� �T'�-GI�1 /L7 - YeJ Z me 7 Assi'sc n:i :? i. a Access `'� vreeM ' �� eonrceuan 6/18/2013 V4� /�4�, I ►rte. � Co �..,`�.�.� �� IMA J 44) r t' AD.S Aa r t- . ,,,(-�� 3 PUD Open Space Within 300 feet of Bluff Creek. Hard cover limited to 25 percent. Within shoreland district, calculated hard cover is 17.9 percent. Total shoreland district 17.4197 acres (758,802 sq.ft.) e p)c" .'af 'Z) i" -1: • Mix of Single-family (32 units) and twin homes (26) • Development Standards: intent, permitted uses, setbacks, lot coverage, and minimum lot requirements. • Compliance List of maximum hard cover per lot. 6/18/2013 (14P) W M, 4 Grading P4 � 1 6/18/2013 5 Infrastructure -fw.- Irce Preservation 1 6/18/2013 rfG� Q-a.n 4-1- _4-llrf a C Parks & Recreation Conditional Use Permit Development in Bluff Creek Corridor Requires CUP approval. Required qo foot setback from Bluff Creek Corridor primary zone. The first zo feet is a buffer. 6/18/2013 Dq.� i1iCL IZ p y� �s��-,a p1�,7f' �Lytir 2,rr 5 . ce"A t\ • 6� G.4 �6VA 4 IAF Primary Mne & Setback Recomm" The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning, subdivision and conditional use permit for the Camden Ridge development subject to the conditions of the staff report and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 6/18/2013 L V ' '�'k" �OVD H REVISOR 6120.3800 6120.3800 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Subpart 1. Scope of planned unit development provisions. Local governments must consider incorporating, with approval of the commissioner, provisions into shoreland management controls to allow planned unit developments. The provisions may allow planned unit developments for new projects on undeveloped land, redevelopment of previously built sites, or conversions of existing buildings and land. The provisions must be consistent with standards in this part. During the period between adoption of parts 6120.2500 to 6120.3900 and adoption of local government official controls meeting the planned unit development standards in part 6120.3800, preliminary plans for each planned unit development must be reviewed for consistency with part 6120.3800 and approved by the commissioner before final local government approval. Subp. 2. Land use district designation. If local governments allow planned unit developments, the land use districts in which they are an allowable conditional use must be identified in their official controls and on a zoning map. Designation of the districts must be based on consideration of the criteria in part 6120.3200 and the following criteria: A. existing recreational use of the surface waters and likely increases in use associated with planned unit developments; B. physical and aesthetic impacts of increased density; C. suitability of lands for the planned unit development approach; D. level of current development in the area; and E. amounts and types of ownership of undeveloped lands. Expansions to existing commercial planned unit developments involving up to six dwelling units or sites, unless the density determined under subpart 6, item A is exceeded, may be allowed as permitted uses under standards developed by local units of government. The date of effect of official controls adopted by each local government under this part must be the base date for determination of expansions. Expansions exceeding these limits must be processed as conditional uses and meet the standards in this part. Subp. 3. Information requirements. Provisions for submission of adequate information by project proponents must be included in official controls. The provisions must include at least the following: A. a site plan for the project showing property boundaries, surface water features, existing and proposed structures, sewage treatment systems, topographic contours at ten -foot intervals or less, and other facilities; and B. documents that explain how the project is designed and will function. These ordinarily include covenants that require membership in a property owners association. Copyright •?2009 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Res_rved. 2 REVISOR 6120.3800 various easements, a concept statement describing the project, floor plans for structures, and various other drawings or plans. Subp. 4. Dwelling unit or site density evaluation. Proposed new or expansions to existing planned unit developments must be evaluated using the following procedures and standards: A. The project parcel must be divided into .tiers by locating one or more lines approximately parallel to a line that identifies the ordinary high water level at the following inte s, proceeding landward: Shoreland Tier Dimensions Unsewered Sewered (feet) (feet) General development lakes - first tier 200 200 General development lakes - second and additional tiers 267 200 Recreational development lakes 267 267 Natural environment lakes 400 320 All river classes 300 300 B. The area within each tier is next calculated, excluding all wetlands, bluffs, or land below the ordinary high water level of public waters. This area is then subjected to either the residential (subpart 5) or commercial (subpart 6) planned unit development density evaluation steps to arrive at an allowable number of dwelling units or sites. Subp. 5. Residential planned unit developme'at density evaluation steps and design criteria. The density evaluation steps and design criteria for residential planned unit developments are contained in items A to D. A. The area within each tier is divided by the sinvle residen i�, t n Mrd for lakes or, for rivers, the single residential lot width standard times the tier depth unless the local unit of government has specified an alternative minimum lot size for rivers which shall then be used to yield a base density of dwelling units or sitesori — e tier. Proposed locations and numbers of dwelling units or sites for the residential planned unit development are then compared with these data and map of the evaluation. Local governments may allow some dwelling unit or site density increases for residential planned unit developments above the densities determined in the evaluation if all dimensional standards in part 6120.3300 are met or exceeded. Maximum density increases may only be allowed if all design criteria in subpart 5, item B, are also met or exceeded. Increases in dwelling unit or site densities must not exceed the maximums in the following table. Copyright %2009 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 3 REVISOR 6120.3800 Allowable densities may be transferred from any tier to any other tier further from the shoreland water body or watercourse, but must not be transferred to any other tier closer. Maximum Allowable Dwelling Unit Or Site Density Increases For Residential Planned Unit Developments Maximum density increase Density evaluation tiers within each tier (percent) First 50 Second 100 ` Third 200 Fourth 200 Fifth 200 B. The design criteria are: (1) All residential planned unit developments must contain at least five dwelling units or sites. (2) Residential planned unit developments must contain open space meeting all of the following criteria: (a) At least 50 percent of the total project area must be preserved as open space. (b) Dwelling units or sites, road rights-of-way, or land covered by _ road surfaces, parking areas, or structures, except water -oriented accessory structures or facilities, are developed areas and should not be included in the computation of minimum open space. (c) Open space must include areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state, and areas containing significant historic sites or unplatted cemeteries. (d) Open space may include outdoor recreational facilities for use by owners of the dwelling units or sites, or the public. (e) The shore impact zone, based on normal structure setbacks, must be included as open space. At least 50 percent of the shore impact zone area of existing developments or at least 70 percent of the shore impact zone area of new developments �l must be preserved in their natural or existing state. -------------------- Copyright 02009 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 4 REVISOR 6120.3800 (f) Open space must not include commercial facilities or uses, but may contain water -oriented accessory structures or facilities. (g) The appearance of open space areas, including topography, vegetation, and allowable uses, must be preserved by use of restrictive deed covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means. (h) Open space may include subsurface sewage treatment systems if the use of the space is restricted to avoid adverse impacts on the systems. (3) Centralization and design of facilities and structures must be done according to the following standards: (a) Residential planned unit developments must be connected to publicly owned water supply and sewer systems, if available. On-site water supply and sewage treatment systems must be centralized and designed and installed to meet or exceed applicable standards or rules of the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. On-site sewage treatment systems must be located on the most suitable areas of the development, and sufficient lawn area free of limiting factors must be provided for a replacement soil treatment system for each sewage system. (b) Dwelling units or sites must be clustered into one or -more---- groups oregroups and located on suitable areas of the development. They must be designed and located to meet or exceed the following dimensional standards for the relevant shoreland classification: setback from the ordinary high water level, elevation above the surface water features, and maximum height. Setbacks from the ordinary high water level must be increased for developments with density increases. Maximum density increases may only be allowed if structure setbacks from the ordinary high. water level are increased to at least 50 percent greater than the minimum setback, or the impact on the waterbody is reduced an equivalent amount through vegetative management, topography, or additional means acceptable to the local unit of government and the setback is at least 25 percent greater than the minimum setback. (c) Shore recreation facilities, including but not limited to swimming areas, docks, and watercraft mooring areas and launching ramps must be centralized and located in areas suitable for them. Evaluation of suitability must include consideration of land slope, water depth, vegetation, soils, depth to groundwater and bedrock, or other relevant factors. The number of spaces provided for continuous beaching, mooring, or docking of watercraft must not exceed one for each allowable dwelling unit or site in the first tier. Launching ramp facilities, including a small dock for loading and unloading equipment, may be provided for use by occupants of dwelling units or sites located in other tiers. Copyright M009 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 5 REVISOR 6120.3800 (d) Structures, parking areas, and other facilities must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color, or other means acceptable to the local unit of government, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. (e) Water -oriented accessory structures and facilities may be allowed if they meet or exceed design standards contained in part 6120.3300, subpart 3, item H, and are centralized. (f) Accessory structures and facilities may be allowed if they meet or exceed standards in part 6120.3300, subpart 3, item H, and are centralized. (4) Erosion control and storm water management for residential planned unit developments must: (a) Be designed, and their construction managed, to minimize the likelihood of serious erosion occurring either during or after construction. This must be accomplished by limiting the amount and length of time of bare ground exposure. Temporary ground covers, sediment entrapment facilities, vegetated buffer strips, or other appropriate techniques must be used to minimize erosion impacts on surface water features. Erosion control plans approved by a soil and water conservation district may be required if project size and site physical characteristics warrant. (b) Be designed and constructed to effectively manage reasonably expected quantities and qualities of storm water runoff. C. Administration and maintenance requirements. Before final approval of all residential planned unit developments, local governments must ensure adequate provisions have been developed for preservation and m�inig^.aaice peetnity of open spaces and for the continued existence and functioning of the development as a community. (1) Open space preservation. Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means must be provided to ensure long-term preservation and maintenance of open space. The instruments must include all of the following protections: (a) commercial uses prohibited; (b) vegetation and topographic alterations other than routine maintenance prohibited; (c) construction of additional buildings or storage of vehicles and other materials prohibited; and (d) uncontrolled beaching prohibited. Copyright €2009 by the Revisor of Stawtes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 6 REVISOR 6120.3800 (2) Development organization and functioning. Unless an equally effective alternative community framework is established, when applicable, all residential planned unit developments must use an owners association with the following features: (a) Membership must be mandatory for each dwelling unit or site purchaser and any successive purchasers. (b) Each member must pay a pro rata share of the association's expenses, and unpaid assessments can become liens on units or sites. (c) Assessments must be adjustable to accommodate changing conditions. (d) The association must be responsible for insurance, taxes, and maintenance of all commonly owned property and facilities. D. Conversions. Local governments may allow existing resorts or other land uses and facilities to be converted to residential planned unit developments if all of the following standards are met: (1) Proposed conversions must be initially evaluated using the same procedures and standards presented in this part for developments involving all new construction. Inconsistencies between existing features ,of the development and these standards must be identified. (2) Deficiencies involving water supply and sewage treatment, structure color, impervious coverage, open space, and shore recreation facilities must be corrected as part of the conversion or as specified in the conditional use permit. (3) Shore and bluff impact zone deficiencies must be evaluated and reasonable improvements made as part of the conversion. These improvements must include, where applicable, the following: (a) removal of extraneous buildings, docks, or other facilities that no longer need to be located in shore or bluff impact zones; (b) . remedial measures to correct erosion sites and improve vegetative cover and screening of buildings and other facilities as viewed from the water; and (c) if existing dwelling units are located in shore or bluff impact zones, conditions are attached to approvals of conversions that preclude exterior expansions in any dimension or substantial alterations. The conditions must also provide for future relocation of dwelling units, where feasible, to other locations, meeting all setback and elevation requirements when they are rebuilt or replaced. (4) Existing dwelling unit or dwelling site densities that exceed standards in this part may be allowed to continue but must not be allowed to be increased, either at Copyright k'2009 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 7 REVISOR 6120.3800 the time of conversion or in the future. Efforts must be made during the conversion to limit impacts of high densities by requiring seasonal use, improving vegetative screening, centralizing shore recreation facilities, installing new sewage treatment systems, or other means. Subp. 6. Commercial planned unit development density evaluation steps and design criteria. The density evaluation steps and design criteria for commercial planned unit developments are contained in items A and B: A. Density evaluation steps: (1) Determine the average inside living area size of dwelling units or sites within each tier, including both existing and proposed units and sites. Computation of inside living area sizes need not include decks, patios, stoops, steps, garages, or porches and basements, unless they are habitable space. (2) Select the appropriate floor area ratio from the following table: Commercial Planned Unit Development Floor Area Ratios* Public waters classes Second and additional tiers on unsewered general development Natural lakes; recreational Sewered general development lakes; development lakes; transition and forested fust tier on unsewered river segments. general development .020 lakes; urban, Average unit floor agricultural, tributary area (sq. ft.) river segments 200 .040 300 .048 400 .056 500 .065 600 .072 700 .082 800 .091 900 .099 1,000 .108 Second and additional tiers on unsewered general development Natural lakes; recreational environment development lakes; lakes; transition and forested remote river river segments. segments .020 .010 .024 .012 .028 .014 .032 .016 .038 .019 .042 .021 .046 .023 .050 .025 .054 .027 Copyright L;2009 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 8 REVISOR First 6120.3800 1,100 .116 .058 .029 1,200 .125 .064 .032 1,300 .133 .068 .034 1,400 .142 .072 .036 1,500 .150 .075 .038 *For average unit floor areas less than shown, use the floor area ratios listed for 200 square feet. For areas greater than shown, use the ratios listed for 1,500 square feet. For recreational camping areas, use the ratios listed at 400 square feet. Manufactured home sites in recreational camping areas shall use a ratio equal to the size of the manufactured home, or if unknown, the ratio listed for 1,000 square feet. (3) Multiply the useable area within each tier by the floor area ratio to yield total floor area for each tier allowed to be used for dwelling units or sites. (4) Divide the area computed in subitem (3) by the average determined in subitem (1). This yields a base number of dwelling units and sites for each tier. (5) Determine whether the project is eligible for any additional density increases. To be eligible, projects must meet all of the design standards in item B, and exceed one or more of them. The local unit of government may decide how much, if any, increase in density to allow for each tier, but must not exceed the maximum allowable density increases listed in the following table: Maximum Allowable Dwelling Unit Or Site Density Increases For Commercial Planned Unit Developments Maximum density increase within each tier Tier (percent) First 50 Second 100 Third 200 Fourth 200 Fifth 200 (6) Allowable densities may be transferred from any tier to any other tier further from the shoreland lake or river, but must not be transferred to any other tier closer. Cop) right Z2009 bN the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota All Rights Reserved. 9 REVISOR 6120.3800 B. The design criteria are: (1) Open space. Commercial planned unit developments must contain open space meeting all of the following criteria: (a) At least 50 percent of the total project area must be preserved as open space. (b) Dwelling units or sites, road rights-of-way, or land covered by road surfaces, or parking areas, except water -oriented accessory structures or facilities, are developed areas and should not be included in the computation of open space. (c) Open space must include areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state, and areas containing significant historic sites or unplatted cemeteries. (d) All shore impact zones within commercial planned unit developments must be included as open space, and at least 50 percent of these areas must be preserved in their natural or existing state. (e) Open space may include outdoor recreation facilities for use by guests staying in dwelling units or sites, or the public. (f) Open space may include subsurface sewage treatment systems if use of the space is restricted to avoid adverse impacts on the systems. (2) Design of structures and facilities must be done according to the following standards: (a) Commercial planned unit developments must be connected to —publicly owned water supply and sewer systems, if available. On-site water supply and sewage treatment systems must be designed and installed to meet or exceed applicable rules of the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. On-site sewage treatment systems must be located on the most. suitable areas of the development, and sufficient lawn area free of limiting factors must be provided for a replacement soil treatment system for each sewage system. (b) Dwelling units or sites must be located on suitable areas of the development. They must be designed and located to meet or exceed the following dimensional standards for the relevant shoreland classification: setback from the ordinary high water level, elevation above surface water features, and maximum height. Maximum density increases may only be allowed if structure setbacks from the ordinary high water level are increased to at least 50 percent greater than the minimum setback, or the impact on the waterbody is reduced an equivalent amount through vegetative management, topography, or other means acceptable to the local unit of government and the setback is at least 25 percent greater than the minimum setback. Copyright s"2009 by the Revisor of statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 10 REVISOR 6120.3800 (c) Structures, parking areas, and other facilities must be designed and located in a manner that minimizes their visibility from surface water features, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. The structure, dwelling unit, accessory structure, or parking area must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color, or other means acceptable to the local unit of government assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening must be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be provided. (d) Water -oriented accessory structures and facilities may be located within shore impact zones if they meet or exceed design standards contained in part 6120.3300, subpart 3, item H. (e) Shore recreation facilities, including but not limited to swimming areas, docks, and watercraft mooring areas and launching ramps, must be centralized and located in areas suitable for them. Evaluation of suitability must include consideration of land slope, water depth, vegetation, soils, depth to groundwater and bedrock, or other relevant factors. The number of watercraft allowed to be continuously beached, moored, or docked must not exceed one for each allowable dwelling unit or site in the first tier, notwithstanding existing mooring sites in an existing harbor. Launching ramp facilities, including a small dock for loading and unloading equipment, may be provided for use by occupants of dwelling units or sites located in other tiers. (3) Erosion control and storm water management for commercial planned unit developments must: (a) Be designed, and their construction managed, to minimize the likelihood of serious erosion occurring either during or after construction. This must be accomplished by limiting the amount -and length of time of bare ground exposure. Temporary ground covers, sediment entrapment facilities, vegetated buffer strips, or other appropriate techniques must be used to minimize erosion impacts on surface water features. Erosion control plans approved by a soil and water conservation district may be required if project size and site physical characteristics warrant. (b) Be designed and constructed to effectively manage reasonably expected quantities and qualities of storm water runoff. Impervious surface coverage within any tier must not exceed 25 percent of the tier area, except 35 percent impervious surface coverage may be allowed in the first tier of general development lakes with an approved storm water management plan and consistency with part 6120.3300, subpart 4. Statutory Authority: MS s 105.485 History: 13 SR 3029 Posted: June 11, 2008 Copyright 02009 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. JEURISSEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That B. Elmer Family Forms, LLC, o Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner, of the fallowing desGded property situated in the County of Caner. Stale al Minnesota, to wit: The Northwest Wolter of the Northwest Walter of Section 25, Township 116, Range 23 (referred to herein as Tract A). ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Section 23, Township 116. Range 23; thence running North on Section Line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feel East of the Southwest comer of said Section; thence West W feet to said Southwest corner of said Section and place of beginning. Being a three -cohered piece in Southwest comer of said Section 23, Township 116. Range 23. ALSO: Beginning at the Southeast comer of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116. North of Range 23 West; thence south clang the quarter -quarto section line a distance of 800 feet to Caner County Rood No. 14; thence cost along the north tine of said Carver County Road No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the aforementioned quarter-quorler section 827 feet to a point 26 feet north of the east -west quarto -quarto section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26. thence West a distance of 26 feel to the quarter -quarto section line; thence south a distance of 26 fact to place of beginning (referred to heroin as Tract B). EXCEPT: that part of Tract A which fes Easterly of LINE 1 descrbod below: LINE 1. Commencing at the north quarter corner of saitl Section 25; thence run west on on azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section 1634.23 feet to the point of beginning of Line I to be descreed; thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence on on azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 478.20 feet; thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds far 201.73 feet; thence on on azimuth of 216 degrees 08 minutes 53 ssconds for 506.64 feet to o point o the ..in line of said Northwest Winter of the Northwest Quarter and mere terminating; and EXCEPT that pot of Tract B which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of LINE 2 described below: LINE 2. Commencing at the point of termination of Line 1 described above; thence run east on an azimuth of 91 degrees 23 mmutea 44 seconds along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Worter of said Section 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence on arn avni of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 se rods far 448.73 feel; thence an an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 feet; thence on an azimuth of 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet; thence on An azimuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes S4 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating; 1ST ADDITION SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE nereby certify that I nave surveyed and platted the property described on to is plat as JEURISSEN IST ADDITION, that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary su wy that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat; that all monuments depicted on the plot haw been or will be ..1rmly set within o no year as indicated on the plat; that all water boundaries and wet lands as defined in MS 505.01. Subd. A existing as of the dote of this certification ore shown and labeled on the plat; and that d1 Public ways are shown and labeled on the plat PeterJ. Hawkinson, Registered Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 42299 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Sufmyars Certificate by Peter J. Hawkinson. Minnesota License No. 42299, was acknowledged before me this day of . 20_ . Notary Public. My Commission Expires CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA Count, Minnesota This plat of JEURISSEN IST ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen. Minnesota at A regular meeting thereof held this day of 20_ and is in compliance with the provisions of MMnesota Statutes. Section 505.03. Subdivision 2. All monuments ell be set as day of , 20 , specified by the City Council and as stated on this plat according to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 505. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA Mayor By. Clerk Together with right of access retained in Wit Claim Deed Document NO. 310751 pursuant to Access Orieway Permit COUNTY SURVEYOR, Calver County. Minnesota dated August 26, 2012. Pursuant to Chapter 395. Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been approved this day of Has caused the some to be surveyed and platted as JEURISSEN IST AQDITON and does hereby debate and dedicate to the 20 public for public use foreswv the public We, and the easements as shown on this plot for drainage and utility purposes wly. In witness whereof said B. Elmer Family Forms. LLC. a Minnesota limited licblity company, has cousea these presents to be signed by its proper offer this day of 20 B. Elmer Family Forms, LLC STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Inc foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 40_ , by as of B. Eimer Pandy Forms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, or, beret} of said company. Notary Public, My Cammisvan Expires County, Minnesota .bhn E Frsemyer Caner County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER, Carver County. Minnesota I hereby certify that foxes payable in doy of and prior years have been pail for lana described on this plat, outside this 20 Laurie Engelen, County Auditor/Treowrer COUNTY RECORDER, Carver County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this plat of JEURISSEN IST ADDITION was filed this day of at o'clock Y. as Document No. Mark Lundgren, County Recorder 20 PIONEERenginming SHEET 1 OF 2 SHIFTS law m mos om"H0 9oz rol w e 901. S S 90I I E 601 F S 981 Z E 981 T E i9i R 191E 6 I T9[ f TIDE < I L9[ 9 I 9Z 6 I L9E I I9[ E I 19E Z f L9£ i I l9i ft E L91F ft E S9.' Y5 E [50 R E TIDE R E L98 R E TIDE ft E 591E b E L9[ B E L96 L E I9E 9 E TIDE . f L9E E F 9Z Z E L9I T E 166E R L IfhE R Z Ia6F w i .� 6 Z wfiF 9 L IbE b L I� I Z wbE E Z 66E Z L 66E T Z 981 K L 981 R L 901 R T 9B1 R [ 501 ft T 9H• fi T 9191 • i 981 c L 901 9 T 9®I 6 [ 901 f I 981 Z L 901 [ I 91N)ktl3M13E1YM011V 301 Y1019 3NY339Y101pJ f1gNI6JY1Ib13pVM0Iry sr9Nvx� smt YlosaNenw'xlnovuia wv. mw 603[1116N3lLLT.Ttl Hlff SOF91 3FJVxHAOJ SnOIA�IadYHI +•* aerc-res ai SSlanlf HVNN3'i and AaVNiLVI'IgHd Le<.1m >A �,.,„ — _ • .161-1W 1159) n' 2,.,u""HUHNSId a: s ioilno 1 a iov.no ♦ a f / - - lO9LLSq k 0 J[T3tE) 111119 - - - - - �. - - - - - - - - t %tel •l �-- / • R ! ♦ I N6Y9 1 -'...' -"_-- --. [ L ♦ NOLL 1 \ • `� - t l • ! �.,� s lORllSla Ala3A0 N3380 i ® • • • • • 'I • • --� ddme woad 3AOw38 - ♦l HLnos 3Alaa N008 a3Ala V 'e 1011nO 'L Hoole Z V l SIO -1 / ' --- - - --- .-. - _---- NOW NOad kV N3AO N3360 dine 3AOY438 (ONmine of ONI(IIne .s t) N3Ve13s aaVA MIS .S'L / - - - - - - - - - - -- M/a 01 NOVe13S oaVk 3015 OZ,-.- SNOISIA36 and O31S3n03a / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - %9'b£ :3OV83AOO snOIA83dw1 MIS ;. -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - '� ``• ``• s383v bsz s ro3av snolna3dnl 311s lvlol �`, s383v sIo s sloe S380V 9ZZ'0 :llVal - . - _ - - - ``. SMOV Sz£'o :a1VM3alS - -- - - - - - - - - - S383V 4ZL'Z :133a15 ./ .---- .--L :SV38V SnOlAa3dWl 03ZIW311 / - - _ _ _ S3a3V Ol8'£Z :V3NV IV -Id Mol //.'-- :Viva 311S N3380 dime d0 H180N - - - - --- -- -- .- - - - .1334 NI i'IYJS JNIdY1I� ooa 30VdS N3dO 3115 03dO13A30 Im %00'09 30V1N3083d 30VdS N3dO CINVI380HS S3UOV Z09'9 :ONV13NOHS NI 30VdS N3dO 1V101 S380V 40Z'£L :V38V ONVI38014S 1V101 SNOLLVlf10lVO 30VdS N3dO ONVU80HS Administration June 14, 2013 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Fax: 952.227.1110 Joe Jablonski 00 Market Boulevard Lennar PBox 16305 36b Avenue North Chanhassen, MNN 55317 been cancelled. The City cannot complete the development review process before the Phone: 952.227.1300 Plymouth, MN 55446 Administration Re: Camden RidgeExtension of Review Deadline -Planning Case 2013-13 Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Mr. Jablonski: Building Inspections Paul Oehme, City Engineer Phone: 952.227.1180 Due to the Independence Day holiday, the July 8, 2013 City Council meeting has Fax: 952.227.1190 been cancelled. The City cannot complete the development review process before the Phone: 952.227.1300 initial 60 -day review period (July 16, 2013) is complete. Therefore, the City is taking Engineering Phone: 952.2271160 the additional 60 -da review period Y P provided by state law. The official review period Fax: 952.227.1170 now ends September 14, 2013. However, we have scheduled this item for the July 22, 2013 City Council meeting for review. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) Fax: 952.227.1110 227-1131 or bgenerous(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Fark & Recreation CGO=idiYally, Phone:2.211 Fax:952.227.1110 ) v Recreation Center J 2310 Coulter Boulevard Robert Generous, AICP Phone: 952.227.1400 Senior Planner Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & c: Bruce Jeurissen Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Fax: 952.227.1110 Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Paul Oehme, City Engineer Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 9 \plan\2013 planomg cascc12013-13 camel® tidgelrmm cxtmsion lencdoc Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED & CenterPoint® Energy May 23, 2013 City of Chanhassen Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner 700 West Linden Avenue PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 RE: Planning Case: 2013-13, CAMDEN RIDGE, rezoning, Conditional Use Permit Dear Mr. Generous: With reference to your request, CenterPoint Energy has no natural gas mains or services within the rezoning area and no interest in the Conditional Use Permit and has no objection to these proposals. If you have any questions, please contact me at 612 -3211 -5381 - Respectfully, CENTERPOINT ENERGY 0 t It ar-r Chuck Mayers Right -of -Way Specialist Engineering Services charles. mayers@centerpointenergy. com 612-321-5381 Generous, Bob From: Littfin, Mark Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 10:28 AM To: Generous, Bob Subject: Plan review for rezoning. Planning case 2013-13. PID25-0232300 Bob, I have the following comments/requirements for the above project 1. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 2. A 3 foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants MSFC Sec. 508.5.4. 3. Temporary street signs must be installed prior to home construction. MSFC Sec. 505.2. 4. No burning permits will be issued. Any trees removed must either be chipped on site or removed from site. 5. Water mains shall be made serviceable prior to combustible construction. MSFC Sec. 503.1.1. 6. Posts, fences, utility boxes etc. shall not be placed near fire hydrants which would hinder firefighters to quickly located and/or operate fire hydrants in a safe manner. MSFC Sec. 508.5.4. 9tarkLittfin Chanhassen Fire Marshal 7700 Market Blvd. PO box 147 Chanhassen MN. 55317 Direct 952.227.1151 Fax 952.227.1190 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100 Planning Case No.cXi —1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION MAY 17 2013 CHANHA9cCN 01 AAWAIn -. — Name Phone: Fax: Email:,._ <L10 5L!P-te�,co+ Property Owner Name and Address: Phone Email: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP)4,)L5 Co Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning 7 Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review (SPR)" ( PIOA- �r, �5 dor _zSubdivision`400 t lt)X60) :�l 1150D Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-WaylEasements (VAC) (Additional recording fees may appty) Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign—$200 (City to install and remove) X Escro Filing Fees/Attomey Cost" 5C - $50 U SPRIVACIVARANAP/Metes & Bounds -$450 Minor SUB 4 a o I TOTAL FEE S 2 i/ , 5 ja O . o` An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be Invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Gu.le �' 70S `Five (5) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81 X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tif) format. "Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: LOCATION:_ f ,'4�r Or S1✓FFCree4— R - LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: Z5O Z 3 Z 3 Co TOTAL ACREAGE: WETLANDS PRESENT x YES NO PRESENT ZONING: _ A oQ, REQUESTED ZONING. `PLED--jZ PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: w;4, S; "c l- -J REASON FOR REQUEST: AS , d cow FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW: Include number of existing employees: and new employees: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and cored to the best of my knowledoe. ' glplwVum dewlopm review eppliry m dm 5--/? - �--70>3 Date S- /O-- /3 Date SCANNED it CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 05/31/2013 9:53 AM Receipt No. 00220909 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Lennar Family of Builders 16305 36th Ave N, Ste 600 Plymouth MN 55446 - Camden Ridge Planning Case 2013-13 ------------------------------------------------------- Conditional Use Permit 425.00 Recording Fees 50.00 Rezoning to PUD -R 250.00 GIS List -20.00 Total Cash Check 00424188 Change 705.00 0.00 705.00 0.00 SCANNED CAMDEN RIDGE - PLANNING CASE 2013-13 $750.00 Rezoning to PUD -R $1,500.00 Subdivision ($600+15'60) $425.00 Conditional Use Permit $50.00 Recording Fee $200.00 Notification Sign $2,925.00 TOTAL $2,220.00 Less Check 420123 from Lennar Family of Builders $705.00 Less Check 424188 from Lennar Family of Builders $0.00 BALANCE SCANNED io�6 Lennar Family of Builders JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. STUB CHECK NO. 424188 900000.1010.114 1 of 1 DATE 05/28/13 INVOICE Co..R NUMBER DATE PAYMENTADVICE GROSS DISCOUNT NET 17600 201305 70500 IF 052313 JEURISSEN CHANHASSEN CAMDEN RD $705.00 $0.00 $705.00 SCHiVNE 1874551 City Of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 $705.00 $0.00 $705.00 Chanhassen MN 55317-0147 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2013-13 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 18, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of approximately 36.2 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 10 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Property is located at 1500 Pioneer Trail. Applicant: Lennar. Owner: Bruce Jeurissen. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2013-13 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner Email: b¢enerous@ci.chanhassen.mmus Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on June 6, 2013) SCANNED Date: May 21, 2013 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department Review Response Deadline: June 7.2013 By: Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner Subject: CAMDEN RIDGE —Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of approximately 24 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 7 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Property is located at 1500 Pioneer Trail (see location map). Applicant: Lennar. Owner: Bruce Jeurissen Planning Case: 2013-13 PID: 25-0232300 The above-described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on May 17, 2013. The 60 -day review period ends July 16, 2013. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on June 18, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than June 7, 2013. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official E Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 6. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 7. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 8. Telephone Company (CenturyLink) 9. Electric Company (Xcel Energy) 10. Mediacom 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 11. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 0 w z z 6 CO 3i LLI ml ji a .4 6 C=D :rw z TUJ 00 W oir >- < Fr LLJ le - 9 0 w z z 6 CO o a @ po o o as � � Itl�. Y.'i • - u r- a s W a N Qp CoN c7 z !g = W 2 a a> 5 =W UU �— a Z LLW yoir \\ " 4 xZ \\ tl! \ Q 1 f bh aq � •'Yh / �. `` Q g •t4 °`� S. 1o�J z r;me a > LLJ W ! J� / a.n �sMnanm 4 \ C6iLC1 •.S I.SZ0.•;; —� N _ — aaa:. i9op a ° C SS:c Ig CITU OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 17 2013 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION AREA SKETCH PLAT FILE NO C.R. DDC. N0. AREA 4)MMARV LO nLL 1oRunar MA - 155,5]] .N. (]5.5)3 OL G - 155,5)] A (355733 IDISNEERengineving SCANNED PI NEERengineeri ❑ 2422 ENTERPRISE DRIVE 5 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 PHONE: (651) 681-1914 5 FAX: (651) 681-9488 TO: City of Chanhassen CORRESPONDENCE SENT VIA: ❑ MAIL ❑ FAX: ❑ OTHER LETTER OF TRA=NA DATE: 5-17-13 JOB NO. 112289 ATTENTION: Kate Aanenson RE: Juerissen Parcel Chanhassen, Minnesota ❑ PAGES INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 5 Preliminary Plat Plans - Juerissen Parcel w/8.5x11 5 Juerrissn 1" Addition Final Plat w/8.5x11 2 Wetland Delineation Report 2 Soils Report 2 1 Stormwater Management Plan THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW ❑ FORAPPROVAL ❑ FORYOURUSE ❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, MDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE SCANNED Jerrison Property — Chanhassen, MN Wetland Delineation Report For: Lennar Corporation of MN 16305 36`h. Ave. N Suite 600 Plymouth, MN. 55446 6 W arrowhead environmental c o n s u I t i n g Wetland Consulting Services Performed by: Ben Carlson, WDC (#1125) CITY OF CHANHASSEN AEC Project # 2012-062 RECEIVED MAY 17 2013 January 8, 2013 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Arrowhead Environmental Consulting 1545 Minnie Avenue Orono, MN 55364 SCANNED TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Overview: Summary of Project and Results Report Body: Introduction -1 Discussion .................. _....... _2 Data Sources and Literature References ................................• -----------.......--•----------------_3 Project Figures and Supporting Data: Figure 1: Map of Project Location (USGS Topo) Figure 2: Map of Project Location (MN DNR PWI Map) Figure 3: Carver County Soil Survey Figure 4: National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 5: Map of Wetland Delineation (Survey Located) Field Data Collection Forms (Data Sheets) Photo Log V , Project Overview On November 9a', 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a wetland delineation of the Jerrison Property located in Chanhassen, MN. • One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds; Wetland 1 is a Seasonally Flooded Basin located throughout the central portion of the parcel. • Wetland 1 is not indicated on the NWI map. • Wetland 1 is not indicated on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory Map (PWI); however, Bluff Creek crosses the property (which is connected to Wetland 1). • Wetland 1 is mapped in the Hamel (Hydric), Houghton (Hydric), and Lester (Non -Hydric) soil series. • Wetland 1 is dominated by reed canary grass and forested species such as American elm, boxelder, and dogwood species. • The wetland boundary was generally placed along the vegetative transition from hydrophytic to non-hydrophytic vegetation (which correlated to a rise in topography), the transition from hydric to non -hydric soils, and the presence or lack of hydrology indicators. Introduction On November 90', 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a wetland delineation at the Jenson Property located in Chanhassen, MN. The legal description of the project location is: A part of the NW '/4 of Section 26, TI 16N, R23W, Carver County, Chanhassen, Minnesota. The parcel is a total of 36 +/- acres (according to the Carver County Website). Methods AEC utilized the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and Midwest Regional Supplement to perform the wetland delineation. A United States Geological Survey (USGS) Map (Shakopee Quad) (Figure 1), the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) Public Water Inventory (PWI) Map (Figure 2), the Carver County Soil Survey Map (Figure 3), and the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map (Figure 4) were reviewed prior to the site visit and used in the delineation process. The delineated wetland boundary (survey located) is indicated on Figure 5 and is overlaid on a 2010 aerial image. AEC used the routine delineation method. Wetland classification followed methods described by the USACOE - St. Paul District; Eggers and Reed "Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of MN and WI". The Circular 39 and Cowardin et al. classifications are given as well. The indicator status of plants was determined using the State of Minnesota — 2012 National Wetlands Plant List Final Ratings provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Pink pinflags were used to delineate the wetlands and were numbered sequentially; flagging was hung from adjacent vegetation to aid in location of the pinflags. Sample points were taken to document the vegetation, soils, and hydrology indicators within representative upland and wetland locations. Results Office Results Wetland 1 is not indicated on the NWI map. Wetland 1 is mapped in the Hamel, Houghton, and Lester soil series; the Hamel and Houghton soil series are classified as hydric soils (SCS Hydric Soils of the United States). Wetland 1 is not indicated on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory Map (PWI); however, Bluff Creek crosses the property (which is connected to Wetland 1). Field Results Wetland 1 AEC classified Wetland 1 as a Seasonally Flooded Basin (Type 1/1L, PEMA/PFOIA) wetland. Wetland 1 is dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) with a fringe of boxelder trees (Acer negundo), American elm (Ulmus Americana), and dogwood (Cornus) species. The adjacent upland area is dominated by burdock (Arctium minus), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), smooth brome (Bromus inermis), common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa), and boxelder trees. The boundary for Wetland 1 exhibited a rather abrupt transition (steep slopes) along the wetland to upland edge; in general there was a defined transition between the reed canary grass (wetland) and the burdock, smooth brome, and common buckthorn (upland). The wetland soil borings met the F3 (Depleted Matrix) hydric soil indicator with saturation near the soil surface, oxidized rhizospheres, geomorphic position, and FAC — Neutral Test hydrology indicators present. The upland soil borings did not meet a hydric soil indicator and were lacking hydrology indicators. Wetland 1 is floodplain wetland adjacent to Bluff Creek, Bluff Creek nms though the center of Wetland 1 for the length of the property. Two additional sample points were taken, Sample Points A and B (SP -A & SP -B). SP -A was taken in the NE corner of the parcel near a mapped PEMCd wetland. The area sampled was in a planted soybean (Glycine max) field; the beans were not drowned out and appeared healthy (not stunted). The soil at SP -A was non -hydric and hydrology indicators were lacking; SP -A did not meet jurisdictional wetland criteria. SP -B was taken along the western edge of the property also in a soybean field. As with SP -A, the beans appeared healthy and were not drowned out. The area sampled is mapped as Houghton muck; the soil observed was a clay loam, non -hydric, and lacking hydrology indicators. SP -B did not meet jurisdictional wetland criteria. On Wednesday November 21', 2012, Ben Carlson with AEC met Terry Jeffery with the City of Chanhassen (Local Government Unit) to review the delineation. The wetland delineation was reviewed and considered accurate as delineated in the field. Discussion One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds. Areas delineated as wetland met the three criteria required for a wetland delineation; dominance of hydrophytic vegetation, presence of hydric soil, and (at a minimum) one primary hydrology indicator or two secondary hydrology indicators under normal conditions. In order to be official the wetland delineation must be reviewed and approved by the Local Government Unit (LGU) and potentially other agencies (Local, State, Federal). Any work within or adjacent to a wetland will require Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) permits (and potentially other permits). Please consult with AEC if you plan on filling, draining, excavating wetlands within your project location. If you have any questions regarding this report or any questions about our services please feel free to contact Ben Carlson at any time (612-237-5996). Thank you, 'R-2� 66-� Ben Carlson, WDC Ecologist/Owner Arrowhead Environmental Consulting Data Sources: USGS Quadrangle Map — Shakopee 7.5 -Minute Quadrangle, Minnesota, U.S.A. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Carver County 1986 (Revised 1996 data from the Mn DNR Data Deli, online). Soil Survey of Carver County. U.S.D.A. Data obtained from the NRCS/SSURGO website. United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map — Shakopee Quadrangle. 1991. (Taken from May 1980 aerial photographs). Aerial Photos were obtained the Land Management Information Center website (2010). Literature Referenced/Pechnical Documents: Environmental Laboratory. 1987. 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. 2007. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Eggers, Steve D. and Donald M. Reed. 1997. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. 263pp, unclassified. Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Circular 39. 67pp. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, F W S/OBS-79/31. 103pp. Sabine, B. J. 1999. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Region 3 — North Central (Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin). Resource Management Group, Inc. 77pp. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., Misc. 2006. Field indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States. A guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 6.0 National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., Misc. Publication Number 1491. 1991. 3 Fi u�res c 0 LL m = c 0 m LEI 0 2 0 m _j 0 U3 (D Go 0 m Ln X m La CD Map of Project Location 4 Q � Overlaid on MN DNR PW Map arrowhead �AP,proximateParcel Boundary Figure rt eI1vIr(1 roll rltvl JahnsonProperty C o 1) S U 1 t i n gFeet Chanhassen. MN 0 625 iz50 2'$ L DD ennar Corp. 2 3 II 2!'4w 11 �% i 17 27 Map of Project Location 4 Q � Overlaid on MN DNR PW Map arrowhead �AP,proximateParcel Boundary Figure rt eI1vIr(1 roll rltvl JahnsonProperty C o 1) S U 1 t i n gFeet Chanhassen. MN 0 625 iz50 2'$ L DD ennar Corp. M _= d L o a1 o�d V A u 0 u u� N n L � d C m n CS C O m m O i � m v m Q d O d � x N o 0 4 O � � C o (L Z t4 V v M T N u s O iTL . d= M T N u s O Supporting Data WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Jerrison Property City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 11/9/2012 Applicant/Owner: Lennar Corp. Stale: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T1 16N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Basin Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1 Let Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel (Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are dimaticJhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes 3UMMAKT UI- FINUINGS (IT neeaeo, expiam any answers in remarrts.t Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlani Y Welland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION — Use scientific names of Dlants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1 Ulmus americana Absolute % Cover 20 Dominan t Species Y Indicator Staus FACW Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/8) 2 3 4 5 Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15' 1 20 ) =Total Cover Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 120 x2= 240 FAC species 0 x3= 0 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 X5= 0 Column totals 120 (A) 240 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00 2 3 4 5 0 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 1 Phalans arundinacea 100 Y FACW 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance lest is >50% X Prevalence index is =3.0' Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) •Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 4 5 6 ? 6 9 10 100 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1 2 Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 411 100 Surface Water (Al) Clay loam 6-16 1OYR 4l1 90 7.5YR 4l4 10 C PUM Clay loam _ Drainage Patterns (610) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) _ _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (82) X (C3) _Crayfish Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (85) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) )7 Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (At 2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (613) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (614) _ Drainage Patterns (610) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) _ _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (82) X (C3) _Crayfish Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (85) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (89) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No Depth (inches): ---- present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), H available: Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Jerrison Property City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 11/9/2012 Applicant/Owner: Lennar Corp. State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Up Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T1 16N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2 Let Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel (Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes JUMMAK7 Ur 1-INLANl9J Or rieeaw• VAP16111 miy miaacle ui icuimnn.t Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlani N Welland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION — Use scientific names of intents_ Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Quercus macrocarpa 30 Y FAC that are DBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Acer negundo 30 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.00% (A(B) 60 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 25 Y FAC Total IN, Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 3 FACW species 30 x2= 60 4 FAC species 55 x3= 165 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 10 x5= 50 5 25 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 95 (A) 275 (B) 1 Arctium minus 10 Y UPL Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.89 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% X Prevalence index is =3.0' 4 5 6 7 Morphogical adaptations' (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 10 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must be 1 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic vegetation 0 =Total Cover present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confine the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc— Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 3/1 100 Surface Water (At) Loam 12-20 1OYR 3/2 100 High Water Table (A2) Clay loam Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _Drainage Hydrogen Sulfide Odor Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (81) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (CB) Sediment Deposits (B2) _Crayfish (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mal or Crust (84) _ _Stunted Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)_ _Geomorphic (C6) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Remarks* Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required) Surface Water (At) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _Drainage Hydrogen Sulfide Odor Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (81) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (CB) Sediment Deposits (B2) _Crayfish (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mal or Crust (84) _ _Stunted Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)_ _Geomorphic (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ _Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No T Depth (inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No ---=Depth (inches): present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Jerrison Property City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 11/9/2012 Applicant/Owner: Lennar Corp. State: MN Sampling Point: 1-2 Wet Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T1 16N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Basin Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1 Let Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Lester (Non -Hydric) 40 Classification: None Are climatidhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes OUNHAAKT uF r'INUINGS Pl neeueu, ewp.u. airy auawcm ni mei mna.� Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetian, Y Wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of Dlants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1 Absolute % Cover Dominan Indicator t Species Staus Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 2 3 4 5 SaolimUShrub stratum (Plot size: 15' 1 0 ) =Total Cover Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of: OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 FACW species 100 x2= 200 FAC species 0 x3= 0 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 x5= 0 Column totals 110 (A) 210 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.91 2 3 4 5 0 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW 2 Polygonum amphibium 3 10 BL3 N 0131- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophyfic vegetation X Dominance testis >50% X Prevalence index is =3.0' Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) -1ndicatws of hydric soil and weliand hydrdogy must be Present, unless disturbed or Problematic 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' 1 2 110 ) =Total Cover Hydrophytic; vegetation present? Y 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (InGude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) SOIL Sampling Point: 1-2 Wel Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 4/1 100 Secondary Indicators minimum of two required Clay loam 6-16 10YR 4/1 90 7.5YR 4/4 10 C PUM Clay loam Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _True Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (Bt) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)_ (C6) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (AS) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (Al 0) X Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S7) Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (09) Hydric soil present? Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Welland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _True Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (Bt) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5)_ (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (09) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No —7__ Depth (inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No Depth (inches): present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), 0 available: Remarks WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Jamison Property City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 11/9/2012 Applicant/Owner: Lennar Corp. State: MN Sampling Point: 1-2 Up Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T1 16N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Lester (Non -Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil or hydrology _ naturally problematic? present? Yes bUMMAKY OF FINUINGS In neeaeo, explain any answers ni remains./ Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlani N Welland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of Dlants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.00% (AB) 5 0 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of. 2 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 0 x2= 0 FAC species 80 x3= 240 FACU species 10 x4= 40 UPL species 25 x5= 125 3 4 5 0 =Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 115 (A) 405 (B) 1 Poe pratensis 80 Y FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.52 2 Bromus inermis 25 Y UPL 3 Sofidago canadensis 10 N FA CU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is =3.0' Morphogical adaptations' (provide 4 5 6 ? 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) 10 115 =Total Cover Woody vine stratumPlot size: 30' ( ) 'Indicators U hydric sail and wetland hydrology must be 1 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hyarophytic vegetation 0 =Total Cover present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) SOIL Sampling Point: 1-2 Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0-14 10YR 4/3 100 Surface Water (Al) Sandy clay loam Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (81) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) _Crayfish (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Deposits (133) of Reduced Iron (C4) or Stressed Plants (D1) —Drift Algal Mal or Crust (B4) _Presence _Stunted Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (65) _ (C6) _ 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: _Histisol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Hislic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Ft) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (FB) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Hydric soil present? N Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (81) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) _Crayfish (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Deposits (133) of Reduced Iron (C4) or Stressed Plants (D1) —Drift Algal Mal or Crust (B4) _Presence _Stunted Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (65) _ (C6) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No -S� Depth (inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No Depth (inches): present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Jerrison Property City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 11/9/2012 Applicant/Owner: Lennar Corp. State: MN Sampling Point: SP -A Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2 Let Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel (Hydric) VWI Classification: PEMCd Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes aumMART ur rimulNba in nnaueu, VAp..... any auawem m wmew.t FV�Hydrophytic vegetation present? N ydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlam N etland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION — Lisp scientific names of plants_ Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1 Absolute % Cover Dominan Indicator t Species Staus Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.00% (A/B) 2 3 4 5 Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size: 15' 1 0 ) =Total Cover Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 0 x2= 0 FAC species 0 x3= 0 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 100 x5= 500 Column totals 100 (A) 500 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.00 2 3 4 5 0 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) 1 Glycine max 100 Y UPL 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation _Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is =3.0' Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation` _(explain) •Indicators of hydric will and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed m problematic 4 5 6 ? a 9 10 100 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1 2 Hydrophytic vegetation present? N 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Harvested beans, area not drowned out, beans appeared healty (not stunted) SOIL Sampling Point: SP -A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks OE 10YR 4/3 100 Surface Water (At) Loamy sand Sediment 6-10 10YR 3/1 100 High Water Table (A2) Clay loam 10-20 1 OYR 3/2 100 Saturation (A3) Loam Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B7) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (82) _Crayfish (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (83) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crest (134) _ —Stunted Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Imn Deposits (135) (C6) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Sal Indicators: Histisol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required) Surface Water (At) Aquatic Fauna (613) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) _True Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B7) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (82) _Crayfish (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (83) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crest (134) _ —Stunted Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Imn Deposits (135) (C6) -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ —FAG Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (89) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No -317__ Depth (inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No Depth (inches): present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Jerrison Property City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 11/9/2012 Applicant/Owner: Lerner Corp. State: MN Sampling Point: SP -B Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T1 16N, Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1 Let: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel (Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? R23W Yes bUrArdAKT OF MNUINUZ$ Or neeoeu, expiam any answers in renmms./ Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetiani N Wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION — Use scientific names of Dlants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1 Absolute % Cover Dominan Indicator t Species Staus Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.00% (AB) 2 3 4 5 Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15' 1 0 ) =Total Cover Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of. OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 0 x2= 0 FAC species 0 x3= 0 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 100 x5= 500 Column totals 100 (A) 500 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.00 2 3 4 5 0 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 1 Glycine max 100 Y UPL 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is =3.0' Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' _(explain) •Indinbrs of hydric soil and wetland hydrdogy must be I present, unless disb rbed or problematic 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 100 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1 z Hydrophytic; vegetation present? N 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Harvested beans, area not drowned out, beans appeared healty (not stunted) SOIL Sampling Point: SP -B Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0-28 10YR 2/1 100 Surface Water (At) Clay loam 28-36 10YR 5/2 100 High Water Table (A2) Clay loam Carbonates present Drainage Patterns (810) Saturation (A3) _True Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) _Crayfish (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (83) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Position (D2) Iron Deposits (85) _Geomorphic (C6) _ 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (All 0) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Remarks: Lacking mottles Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required Surface Water (At) Aquatic Fauna (613) Surface Soil Cracks (86) High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Plants (614) Drainage Patterns (810) Saturation (A3) _True Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) _Crayfish (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (83) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Position (D2) Iron Deposits (85) _Geomorphic (C6) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (139) —Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No —St- Depth (inches): present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: GO December 20, 2012 Mr. Joe Jablonski L.ennar - Minnesota Division 16305 366, Ave N. Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 HGTS Project Number: 12-398 Re: Geotechnical Exploration Report Proposed Liberty at Creek Side Residential Development Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Mr. Jablonski: We have completed the geotechnical exploration report for the proposed Liberty at Creek Side residential development in Chanhassen, Minnesota. The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and ground water conditions and provide recommendations for site grading and foundation support for the proposed residential development. In general, the soil borings encountered varying depths of topsoil overlying clayey soils to the termination depths of the borings. The soils are generally suitable for construction of the proposed residential development. Specific details regarding our procedures, results and recommendations follow in the attached geotechnical exploration report. Our services were performed in accordance with Haugo GeoTechmcal Services LLC Proposal 12-398 dated October 23, 2012. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Paul Gionfriddo at 763-954-1101 or Joe Westphal at 612-2694027. Sincerely, Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC. Paul S. Gionfriddo P.E. Consulting Engineer i Joe Westphal, P.E. Project Engineer CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 17 2013 CHANNASSEN PUNNING DEPT 1 3570 GROVE DRIVE #275. MAPLL GRUVE_, MN 553 1 1 m GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PROJECT: Proposed Liberty at Creek Side Residential Development Chanhassen, Minnesota PREPARED FOR: Mr. Joe Jablonski Lennar - Minnesota Division 16305 36th Ave N. Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 PREPARED BY: Haugo GeoTechmcal Services 13570 Grove Drive #278 Maple Grove, MN 55311 Haugo GeoTechnical Services Project: 12-398 December 20, 2012 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. - Consulting Engineer y �' License Number 23093 �• rs December 20, 2012 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project description Lennar Corporation is proposing to develop an approximate 25.6 acres parcel near the intersections of U. S. Highway 212 and Pioneer trail in Chanhassen, MN. Development plans include removing or demolishing the existing structures on the property and preparing approximately fifty eight (58) single family residential lots. Development plans also include constructing the associated streets and underground utilities. Lennar Corporation retained Haugo GeoTechnical Services to perform a geotechnical exploration to evaluate the suitability of site soil conditions to support the anticipated residential structures and provide recommendation for site development. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and provide recommendations for site development. 1.3 Site Description The project site is generally located south of County Road 18 (a.k a. Riley Lake Road) north of Pioneer Trial, east of Audubon Road and west of U.S. Highway 212. More specifically, Bluff Creek borders the project site to the south and U.S. Highway 212 borders the site to the east The land is currently being used for agricultural purposes. The ground surface can be described as gently rolling with elevations at the boring locations ranging from about 914 to 869. Surficial drainage is generally to the south toward Bluff Creek or to the northeast toward wetlands off the project site. At the time of this report a farmstead existed in the southeast quadrant of the property. The farmstead included a single family residence, barn and silo. Foundation remnants of former structures were also observed on the property. We understand the farmstead will be either removed or demolished to make way for the proposed development. The remaining portion of the property was vacant/agricultural land. 1.4 Scope of Services Our services were performed in accordance with Haugo GeoTechnical Services LLC proposal 12-398 dated October 23,201-2. Our scope of services was performed under the terms of our General Conditions and limited to the following tasks: • Completing five (5) standard penetration test borings each to a nominal depth of 15 feet After authorization, Lennar requested an additional five soil borings to a nominal depth of 15 feet; for a total of ten (10) soil borings for the project. • Visually/manually classify samples recovered from the soil borings. • Performing laboratory tests on selected samples. • Preparing soil boring logs describing the materials encountered and the results of groundwater level measurements. • Preparing an engineering report describing soil and groundwater conditions, and providing recommendations for site grading and foundation support. 1.5 Documents Provided We were provided two plan sheets for the project. One plan sheet was titled "Concept Plan 5, Liberty at Creek Side'. This plan sheet showed the proposed site layout and included site data such as lot sizes, number of lots, set back distances and zoning information. The plan sheet was dated March 7, 2012 and was prepared by Pioneer Engineering. The second plan sheet was for titled "Soil Borings, Juerissen Parcel". This plan sheet showed the soil boring locations (surveyed after the soil borings were completed) and existing site contours. The plan was dated November 9, 2102 and was also prepared by Pioneer Engineering. Specific design information, site drawings, site contours or house styles were not available at the time of this report. 1.6 Locations and Elevations The soil borings were taken at the approximate locations as shown on the plan sheets provided by Lennar. The ground surface elevations at the boring locations were included on the "Soil Boring"plan sheet as provided by Lennar and prepared Pioneer Engineering. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the "Soil Boring Location Sketch' in the appendix. The sketch was prepared by Pioneer Engineering. 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES Ten (10) standard penetration test borings were advanced on November 28, 2012 by HGTS with a rotary drilling rig, using continuous flight augers to advance the boreholes. Representative samples were obtained from the borings, using the split -barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASPM Specification D-1586. In the split -barrel sampling procedure, a 2 -inch O.D. split -barrel spoon is driven into the ground with a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18 -inch penetration is recorded as the standard penetration resistance value, or "N" value. The results of the standard penetration tests are indicated on the boring log. The samples were sealed in containers and provided to HGTS for testing and soil classification. A field log of each boring was prepared by the HGTS drill crew. The logs contain visual classifications of the soil materials encountered during drilling, as well as the driller's interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples and water observation notes. The final boring logs included with this report represent an interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on visual/manual method observation of the samples. The soil boring logs, general terminology for soil description and identification, and classification of soils for engineering purposes are also included in the appendix. The soil boring logs identify and describe the materials encountered, the relative density or consistency based on the Standard Penetration resistance (N -value, "blows per foot") and groundwater observations. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions, variations can occur beyond the location of the boring. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Conditions Each of the soil borings encountered clay topsoil at the surface. The topsoil was dark brown to black in color, contained some roots and was judged to be slightly organic. The topsoil ranged in thickness from about 1h foot to 5 feet but was mostly about 1 foot thick- Below hickBelow the topsoil the borings encountered native lean clay of sandy lean clay glacial till to the termination depths of the borings at about 15 feet below the ground surface. The exception was soil boring TH-3. Below the topsoil, soil boring TH-3 encountered about 5 feet of dark brown silty clay which was underlain by about 5 feet of black slightly organic silty clay that extended to a depth of about 12 feet below the ground surface. Below the black silty clay the boring encountered lean clay with sand glacial till to the termination depth of the boring at about 15 feet. Penetration resistance values (N -Values), shown as blows per foot (bpf) on the boring logs, within the clayey soils ranged from 3 to 22 bpf with most of the values between 9 and 16 bpf. These values indicate that the clayey soils had a soft to very stiff consistency but were rather stiff to stiff overall. 3.3 Groundwater Ground water was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling or after removing the augers from the boreholes. It appears that groundwater was below the depths explored. However, given the cohesive nature of the soil encountered, it is likely that insufficient time was available for groundwater to seep into the boring(s) and rise to its hydrostatic level. In addition the sandy lean clay glacial till can contain sand seams or sand layers and ground water can be encountered within them. These sand seams or layers, if any, may not become apparent until construction. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the groundwater levels should be expected. Groundwater measurements were made as noted and shown on the boring logs. Groundwater monitoring wells or piezometers would be required to more accurately determine water levels. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the groundwater levels should be expected. 3.4 Laboratory Tests Laboratory moisture content tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the soil borings. Table 1 below summarizes the results of the laboratory moisture content tests. Results of the laboratory moisture content tests ranged from 15 to 24 percent and are shown on the boring logs adjacent to the sample tested. Table 1. Summary of Laboratory Tests Boring Number Sample Number Depth feet Moisture Content TH-01 S-2 21h 21 TH-02 5-11 71h 18 TH-03 S-20 121/2 24 TH-04 S-24 5 16 TH-05 S-52 5 15 TH-06 S-65 21h 16 TH-07 5-59 5 18 TH-08 5-31 5 19 TH-09 5-37 21/2 19 TH-10 S-47 10 22 We also performed laboratory "pocket penetrometer" tests on selected samples recovered from the borings. The pocket penetrometer uses a calibrated spring to estimate the soils unconfined compressive strength. Pocket penetrometer results ranged 3/4 ton per square foot (tsf) to 41h tsf. Results are shown on the boring log adjacent to the sample tested. 35 OSHA Soil Classification The soils encountered in the borings were cohesive materials including clay, sandy lean clay, lean clay, lean clay with sand and silty clay. The soils identified in the borings will generally be Type B soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Proposed Construction The project consists of removing the farmstead and associated structures and remnants of the former structures and preparing lots and house pads to accommodate approximately 58 single family residential structures. The project also includes construction of new streets and underground utilities. We understand that the specific style of home proposed for each lot has not yet been determined. We assume the new homes could include full basements, walkout or look- out style structures. We anticipate that the new homes will include one or two stories above grade. The new homes will likely consist of cast -in-place concrete or masonry block foundation walls supported on concrete spread footings. We anticipate above grade construction to consist of wood framing, a pitched roof and asphalt shingles. Based on the assumed construction we estimate wall loadings will range from about 1 to 2 kips (1,000 to 2,000 pounds) per lineal foot and column loads, if any will be less than 50 lips (50,000 pounds) - 4.2 Discussion The soil borings completed for this project encountered clayey soils that were generally suitable for support of the proposed residential development. However some soil corrections will be required. Soil corrections will include removing the vegetation and topsoil encountered at the surface in each boring and removing any buried topsoil and soft soil encountered within the proposed building pads, roadways and utility trenches. Soil boring TH-3 encountered buried topsoil that extended to a depth of about 10 feet and soil boring TH-10 encountered soft clays to a depth of about 10 feet below the ground surface. In-place soil moisture contents ranged from about 15 to 24 percent. These moisture contents appear to be above the soils estimated optimum moisture content If the on-site soil will be used as fill or backfill we anticipate that some drying of these soils will be required. The summer months are typically more favorable for drying soils. As mentioned above, we understand the farmstead will be removed in preparation for site development. An evaluation of the property or structures on the property for environmental concerns was beyond the scope of this evaluation The farmstead may have septic systems, private water wells or possibly underground fuel oil (heating oil) tank(s) located on the property. We recommend these structures, if encountered, be removed and/or abandoned in accordance with the appropriate local, state and federal rules and regulations. The following sections provide recommendations for site development. 4.3 Mass Grading Recommendations Excavation We recommend that all vegetation, topsoil, fill, organic soils, and any other soft or loose soil be removed from the proposed building and oversize area. The following table indicates the anticipated excavation depths at the boring locations within the building pad areas. Excavation depths may vary and could be deeper. We further recommend that any building remnants or debris associated with demolition of the existing farmstead structures including footings, foundation walls, floor slabs and utilities, if encountered, be removed from within the building and oversize areas. Table 2. Anticipated Excavation Depths Boring Number Approximate Surface Elevation (feet) Anticipated Excavation Depth (feet)* Anticipated Excavation Elevation (feet)* Anticipated Groundwater Elevation (feet)* TH-01 9062 1 905 NE TH-02 914.1 1 913 NE TH-03 885.0 12 873 NE TH-04 892.3 Y2 892 NE TH-05 893A % 893 NE TH-06 886.7 Y2 886 NE TH-07 892.9 1h 8921h NE TH-08 873.9 1 872 NE TH-09 875.4 1 874 Y2 NE TH-10 869.3 5 to 12 864 Vh to 857 Yh NE NE = Not Encountered.: Excavation depths and elevation were rounded to the nearest ih foot. Fill required to attain site grades and may consist of any debris -free, nonorganic mineral soil. Soils identified as sandy lean clay, lean clay, lean clay with sand and silty clay are generally suitable for use or re -use as fill or backfill provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious material. Some moisture conditioning (drying) of these soils will likely be required to meet the recommended compaction levels. The exception being within 3 feet of the groundwater table where granular soil with less than 7 percent passing the number 200 sieve and at least 50 percent retained on the number 40 sieve should be used. There does not appear to be any material on-site meeting this requirement. Organic soils, including soils that are black in color, topsoil, peat, organic silt, organic clay, if encountered, during soil corrections are not suitable for reuse as fill or backfill. It may be possible to re -use these materials in "green areas' on the site such as landscaping berms. Backfilling We recommend that backfill placed to attain site grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698), except the upper 3 feet of pavement areas, where the compaction level should be increased to a minimum of 100 percent. Fill should be placed within 3 percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin lifts and be compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode. In areas where fill depths will exceed 10 feet we recommend that compaction levels be increased to minimum of 98 percent of the materials standard Proctor density. Even with the increased compaction levels a construction delay may be appropriate to allow for post construction settlement of the fill mass. Fill and backfill placed on slopes must be "benched" into the underlying suitable soil to reduce the potential for slip planes to develop between the fill and underlying soil. We recommend "benching" or excavating into the slope at 5 feet vertical intervals to key the fill into the slope. We recommend each bench be a minimum of 10 feet wide. Foundations We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 42 inches below the exterior grade for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed immediately below the slab provided construction does not occur during below freezing weather conditions. Foundation elements in unheated areas should bear at least 5 feet below exterior grade for frost protection. We anticipate the foundations and floor slabs will bear on compacted engineered fill or native silty clay or sandy lean clay glacial till soils. It is our opinion the footings can be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure up to 2,000 psf. We anticipate total and differential settlement of the foundations will be less than 1 inch and 1h inch, respectively. 4.4 Interior Slabs The anticipated floor subgrade is granular fill over compacted clay fill or native clay soils. It is our opinion a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 200 pounds per square inch of deflection (psi) may be used to design the floor. If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, we recommend that a vapor retarder or vapor barrier be placed immediately beneath the slab. Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor barrier or vapor retarder beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage, but this practice often traps water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. Regardless of where the vapor retarder or vapor barrier is placed, we recommend consulting the floor covering manufacturer regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or vapor barrier to preserve the warranty. 4.5 Below Grade Walls Foundation walls or below grade (basement) walls will have lateral loads from the surrounding soil transmitted to them. The site soils are predominantly clayey in composition. We recommend general waterproofing of the below grade walls. We recommend either placing drainage composite against the backs of the exterior walls or backfilling adjacent to the walls with sand having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing the #40 sieve and less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the #200 sieve. The sand backfill should be placed within 2 feet horizontally of the wall. We recommend the balance of the backfill for the walls consist of sand however the sand may contain up to 20 percent of the particles by weight passing the #200 sieve. Clay may be used to make up the balance of the wall backfill. However consolidation of the clay under its own weight can be expected to continue even after construction. If not accommodated for, structures supported on the clay backfill could settle unfavorably or be damaged. if clay backfill is used, we recommend that construction of grade supported slabs not occur immediately after the below grade walls are backfilled to allow for consolidation/settlement of the clay backfill. The amount of consolidation could range from approximately 1 to 3 percent of the backfill thickness or wall height. We recommend installing drain file behind the below grade walls, adjacent to the wall footing and below the slab elevation. Preferably the drain tile should consist of perforated pipe embedded in gravel. A geotextile filter fabric should encase the pipe and gravel. The drain tile should be routed to a storm sewer, sump pump or other suitable disposal site. Active earth pressures can be used to design the below grade walls if the walls are allowed to rotate slightly. If wall rotation cannot be tolerated then below grade wall design should be based on at -rest earth pressures. We recommend soil parameters found below in Table 3, be used for below grade/retaining wall design. These design parameters are based on the assumptions that the walls are drained, there are no surcharge loads within a horizontal distance equal to the height of the wall and the backfill is level. Table 3. Soil Parameters Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the wall footings and by sliding resistance along the bottom of the wall footings. We recommend a sliding coefficient of 0.35. This value does not include a factor of safety. 4.6 Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs will likely be underlain by clayey soils (lean clay, sandy lean clay, silty clay) which are considered highly frost susceptible. If these soils become saturated and freeze, significant heave may occur. This heave can be a nuisance in front of doors and at other critical grade areas. One way to help reduce the potential for heaving is to remove the frost -susceptible soils below the slabs down to bottom of footing grades, and replace them with non -frost -susceptible backfill consisting of sand having less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the number 200 sieve. Estimated Estimated At -Rest Active Soil Passive Soil Unit Weight Friction Angle Pressure Pressure Pressure Soil T (degrees) Clay 130 28 70 50 360 Sand 115 32 60 35 375 Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the wall footings and by sliding resistance along the bottom of the wall footings. We recommend a sliding coefficient of 0.35. This value does not include a factor of safety. 4.6 Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs will likely be underlain by clayey soils (lean clay, sandy lean clay, silty clay) which are considered highly frost susceptible. If these soils become saturated and freeze, significant heave may occur. This heave can be a nuisance in front of doors and at other critical grade areas. One way to help reduce the potential for heaving is to remove the frost -susceptible soils below the slabs down to bottom of footing grades, and replace them with non -frost -susceptible backfill consisting of sand having less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the number 200 sieve. If this approach is used and the excavation bottoms terminate in non -free draining granular soil we recommend a drain tile be installed along the bottom outer edges of the excavation to collect and remove any water that may accumulate within the sand. The bottom of the excavation should be graded away from the building. If the banks of the excavations to remove the frost -susceptible soils are not sloped, abrupt transitions between the frost -susceptible and non -frost -susceptible backfill will exist along which unfavorable amounts of differential heaving may occur. Such transitions could exist between exterior slabs and sidewalks, between exterior slabs and pavements and along the slabs themselves if the excavations are confined to only the building entrances. To address this issue we recommend sloping the excavations to remove frost -susceptible soils at a minimum 3:1 (horizontal: vertical) gradient. An alternative method of reducing frost heave is to place a minimum of 2 inches of extruded polystyrene foam insulation beneath the slabs and extending it about 4 feet beyond the slabs. The insulation will reduce frost penetration into the underlying soil and reduce heave. Six to 12 inches of granular soil is typically placed over the insulation to protect it during construction. Another alternative for reducing frost heave is to support the slabs on frost depth footings. A void space of at least 4 inches should be provided between the slab and the underlying soil to allow the soil to heave without affecting the slabs. 4.7 Site Grading and Drainage We recommend the site be graded to provide positive run-off away from the proposed buildings. We recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the building and slabs be sloped a minimum of 2 inches. In addition we recommend downspouts with long splash blocks or extensions for each house. 4.8 Utilities We anticipate that the utilities will be supported on variety of native glacially deposited soils or compacted engineered fill following soil corrections. We recommend removing all organic soils, soft or other unsuitable soil, if any, beneath utilities prior to placement. We recommend bedding material be thoroughly compacted around the pipes. We recommend trench backfill above the pipes be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent beneath slabs and pavements, the exception being within 3 feet of the proposed pavement subgrade, where 100 percent of standard Proctor density is required. In landscaped areas we recommend a minimum compaction of 90 percent. 4.9 Pavements We recommend that pavements be designed and constructed in accordance with City of Chanhassen standard plates. The following paragraphs provide general pavement recommendations in the absence of City of Chanhassen standard plates. We recommend removing all vegetation, topsoil, or other unsuitable materials from within 3 feet of the pavement subgrade elevation. Backfill, if needed, to attain pavement subgrade elevation can consist of any mineral soil provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious materials. We recommend compacting the backfill at moisture contents within a range of 1 percentage point below and 3 percentage points above its optimum moisture content. The upper 3 feet of fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. Prior to placing the aggregate base (Class 5) we recommend proof rolling the pavement subgrade to identify soft, weak, loose or unstable areas that may require additional subcuts. We anticipate the subgrade soil will be predominantly clayey in nature (sandy lean clay, lean clay or silty clay). Because of the poor frost/drainage properties of the clay subgrade soil on the site we recommend you consider placing a minimum 1 foot thick drained sand subbase below the aggregate base course in the new pavement areas. We recommend using sand with less than 12% passing the #200 sieve, such as Mn/DOT 3149.2B2. If the sand subbase is used we recommend the subbase extend beneath the curbs and to 2 feet beyond the outside edges of the curbs for frost and drainage uniformity. Sand layers outside the curbs should be capped with slow draining soil to reduce surface water infiltration. If a sand subbase is used in the pavement areas, drainpipes (finger drains) should be installed to remove infiltrating water. The forger drains should be connected to the catch basins. The slope of the bottom of the subcut should be such that water is directed to the drainage areas. The subcut bottom should not include depressions that can act as reservoirs for water collection. R -Value testing was beyond the scope of this project. The soil borings encountered predominantly sandy lean clay soil corresponding to the ASTM classification CL. Sandy lean clay soils typically have R -Values ranging from 6 to 20. It is our opinion that an R - Value of 10 can be used for pavement design. We recommend aggregate base meeting MN/DOT specification 3138 for Class 5 aggregate base. We recommend the aggregate base be compacted to 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor dry density. We recommend that the bituminous wear and base courses meet the requirement of MN/DOT specification 2360. We recommend the bituminous pavements be compacted to at least 92% of the maximum theoretical density. We recommend specifying concrete that has a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 3,900 psi. We recommend specifying 5 to 8 percent entrained air for exposed concrete to provide resistance to freeze -thaw deterioration. We recommend slump, air content and compressive strength test of Portland cement concrete. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation The borings indicated that at the anticipated excavation depths the soils in the sidewalls of the excavations will be primarily Type B soil under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. Temporary excavations should be constructed at a minimum of 1 foot horizontal to every 1 foot vertical within excavations. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. If site constraints do not allow the construction of slopes with these dimensions then temporary shoring may be required. 5.2 Observations A geotechnical engineer should observe the excavation subgrade to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered in the borings and adequate to support the proposed construction. 5.3 Backfill and Fills Site soils that will be excavated and reused as backfill and fill appear to be above their assumed optimum moisture content. We anticipate it will be necessary to moisture condition (dry) these soils to achieve the recommended compaction. We recommend that fill and backfill be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 to 12 inches, depending on the size of the compactor and materials used. 5.4 Testing We recommend density tests of backfill and fills placed for the new house pad. Samples of the proposed materials should be submitted to our laboratory prior to placement for evaluation of their suitability and to determine their optimum moisture content and maximum dry density (Standard Proctor). 5.5 Winter Construction If site grading and construction is anticipated to proceed during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading and placement of fill. No fill should be placed on frozen soil and no frozen soil should be used as fill or backfill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM and/or ACI. Concrete should not be placed on frozen soil. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is obtained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below the footings. 6.0 PROCEDURES 6.1 Soil Classification The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in general accordance with ASTM D 2458, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure)". Soil terminology notes are included in the Appendix. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review of the field classification by a soils engineer. Samples will be retained for a period of 30 days. 6.2 Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottom of the borings, the holes were checked for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after removing the augers from the borehole the holes were once again checked and the depth to water and cave-in depths were noted. 7.0 GENERAL 7.1 Subsurface Variations The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from a limited number of soil borings. Variations can occur between and away from the borings, the nature of which may not become apparent until additional exploration work is completed or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in this report should be made after performing onsite observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program during construction. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. 7.2 Review of Design This report is based on the design of the proposed structure as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the design and specifications. With the review we will evaluate whether any changes have affected the validity of the recommendations and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations We made water level measurements in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. The data was interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. 7.4 Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of Lennar Corporation and their design team to use to design the proposed structure and prepare construction documents. In the absence of our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analysis and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. 75 Level of Care Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC has used the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar circumstance by members of the profession currently practicing in this locality. No warranty expressed or implied is made. APPENDIX Boring Location Sketch-Juerissen Parcel Soil Boring Log TH-01 thru to Th -10 Descriptive Terminology BORING NUMBER TH-01 A- GO Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 _ Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11/28/12 GROUND ELEVATION 906.2 ft (MSL) HOLESUE 3 114 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD _Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encardered NOTES AFTER DRI W NG —Not Encountered at the Cave4n Depth of 8 feet � .-. n. ov 0 U x 0 Q. O J t, MATERIAL DESCRIPTION W z W W M a.D m z } it > d 0oc w rn W 9 r j Q m0> O? i W o. w� Y" 0 r S z D— o ♦ SPT N VALUE AL 20 40 60 80 PL MC LL I --tom 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 20 40 60 80 — Clay, with roots, slightly organic, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) AU . 1 (CL) Lean Clay, brown, moist, very stiff. (Glacial Tin) 0 A SS 2 78-11 (19) I. (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey with rust 5 stairs, moist, rather stiff to stiff. (Glacial Ti) A SS 3 8." (16) 21r SS 4 5.6-8 (14) 10 I SS (�11) 3 A Ss 6 5-7-9 (16) 15 IS F7 45.7 (12) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. BORING NUMBER TH-02 GO Haugo GeoTechnicel Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 `A. Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lernar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11!28112 GROUND ELEVATION 914.1 ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 3114 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRIW NG METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRI W NG —Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 12 feet = ~^ p� 0 U O r7 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w a w w dQi z o ^ Q V r j M D a m0> O ? Z w M W 8 Y" 00 r 3 Z �—. o ♦ SPT N VALUE ♦ 20 40 60 80 PL 0 LL 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) 0 20 40 60 80 LeamClay with Sand, with roots, slightly organic. dark brown, moist. Fowl8 AU (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown aM grey with rust stains, mist very stilt to stiff. (Glacial Til) SS 9 712 (21) 4 112 5 vslos- 43-7 (13) 3 LI 3-5-8 (13) 10 SS 5-7-7 C12 (14) 31/2 U1313 -5- 438 15 IS V14 8-7.8 1 1 (15) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. BORING NUMBER TH-03 Au G Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 ti Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11/28/12 GROUND ELEVATION 885 ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 11 1/2 f ~ 0 U O c7 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w ¢ aD r¢ z e > > d O W m w p Q mO> O? w w: p Z a o ♦ SPT N VALUE A 20 40 60 80 PL .0 LL 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) El 20 40 60 80 — Lean Clay, slightly organic, with roots, black, moist. (Topsoil) AU 15 (CL) Silty Clay, dark brown, moist (Slopewash) SS 3-5-5 L16 (10) 5 3-3-4 LS1 (7) (CL -ML) Silty Clay, slightly organic, black, moist to wet. (Buried Topsoil)LS, 2-4-5 (9) 10 SS 4-55 19 (10) (CL) Lean Clay with Sand, trace Gravel, brown and grey, wet medium. (Glacial Tl)SS S3-3-3 20 (6) 15 SS S4 21 3d (7) 1 Bolton of borehole at 16.0 feet BORING NUMBER TH-04 GO Haugo GeoTecnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 `A- Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lerner Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION ChaNrassen, Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11128/12 GROUND ELEVATION 892.3 It (MSL) HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encormtered NOTES AFTER DRIWNG —Not Encountered at the Cave4n Depth of 12 1/2ft - ~" op. 0 O x � O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CO w ¢ ' g D MZ y > j O O S U it or w i ­D O SH m O> uz Z w IL i- w m Y �- U a Z �. Y o A SPT N VALUE A 20 40 60 80 PL Mc LL 20 40 S0 80 D FINES CONTENT (%) D 20 40 60 80 — Lean Clay with Sand, with roots, slightly organic, dark brown, moist. 11�a) AU � (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey, moist, rafher stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) A SS 23 5-7-8 (15) 5 3 M I F 3-0-5 (9) S35 L25 (10) 10 SS 26 3-7.9 (16) 3 3 [27 8-8-7 (15) 15 IS U28 57-9 (16) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. HaugoGeoTechnicalServices,LLC BORING NUMBERTH .GO OF 1 PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 ` Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11/28/12 GROUND ELEVATION 893.4 ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 irclres DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRIW NG — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 12 112 t d o ov 0 U Q O -' O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION wa m 2 a= < Z Co e y WE > O Ox rn w 3Zm O J¢ m0> O z i W F� w Y`" a Z 7•• ♦ SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PL MC LL 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 20 40 60 80 Lean Clay with Sand, with roots, slightly organic, dark brown, moist (Topsoil) AU 50 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel to with Gravel, brown and grey - with rust stains, moist, stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) ♦ I, F,S5 46-9 (15) 5 4 SS 52 (17) (17) ♦ LSS 53 8-9.11 (20) 10 4 SS 54 7-9-9 (18) 4 ♦ SS 55 7-8-9 (17) 15 SS 56 9-11-11 (22) 41/4 Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. BORING NUMBER TH-06 A.0 G Haugo GwTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 `Li MaPle Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lamar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chaltmssen, Mimesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 112&12 GROUND ELEVATION 886.711 (MSL) NOLE SRE 31/4 itches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and SMB Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not EncarRered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cavell Depth of 12 feet ~^ 0 v Q O t7 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w ¢ aQi Z o > j d K m W p j MC) O Z Z w W a t: Z'i of ♦ SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PL LL 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT I%) ❑ 20 40 60 80 — Lean Clay, slightly organic, black, moist. (Topsoil) AU 64 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey with rust stains, moist, stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) 31/4 SS 65 439 (14) 5 3 SS 66 5.58 (13) 23/4 L67 5(17)-7-1 10 SS 68 -8- 3 ♦ 1 1 LS613S 7-8-12 (20) 15 SS U70 8-10-11 (21) A Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. L— BORING NUMBER TH-07 GO Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 `A_ Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11/28/12 GROUND ELEVATION 892.9 It (MSL) HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 14 feet �� a c ov 0 U O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION (� w } a� M rn o > > O O W N W O j¢ mO> UZ w3 a w: Y` O a �^ Z a—t D— K o A SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PL MC LL 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 20 40 60 80 — Sandy Clay, slightly organic, black, moist (Topsoil)AU (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey with nut 57 stains, moist, rather stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) SS 4A-5 58 (9) 5 21/4 M SS 59 4-"4 (10) SS 6-7-7 60 (14) 10 2 6S -7- 4-7-8 C62 (15) 15 SS 63 8-8-10 (18) 21/2 Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet BORING NUMBER TH-08 A-GD Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 `Ll 13570 Grove Drive, #278 Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11/28/12 GROUND ELEVATION 873.9 ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 31/4 inches DRIWNG CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRIWNG — Nat Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 13 1/2 f a r ww 0 Q O K O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w a �m a5 N z er M > O O-v w 3z-�+ ¢ MO> O? w w w. Y" pa 3 Z n �-" M ♦ SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PL MC LL --0 20 40 60 80 ED FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 20 40 60 80 — Silty Clay, slightly organic, black, moist. (Topsoil) AU 29 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey to 14 feet then dark grey, moist, medium to stiff. (Glacial Til) SS 2-4-5 30 (9) 5 2 SS 31 234 (7) SS 2-24 32 (6) 10 21/2 Ss 33 34-6 (10) SS 5-" 34 (14) 15 3 SS U35 7-8-8 (16) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. BORING NUMBER TH-09 A- GO Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 _ Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECTNAME Libertyat Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11118/12 GROUND ELEVATION 875.4ft (MSL) HOLE SUE 31/4 inches DRIWNG CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 13 feet ~ p� O O O� MATERIAL DESCRIPTION W c W � e > irs > O o� W 09 O j Q mO> OD z w w U`" n 3 Z n o ♦ SPT N VALUE • 20 40 60 80 PL Mc LL �� 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) El 0 20 40 60 80 —. Silty Clay, slightly organic, with roots, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) AU 36 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey to 14 feet than dark grey, moist, rather stiff to stiff. (Glacial Til) C37 -7- (13) 4 5 L SS 38 45S (11) C39 (12)-5-21/2 10 SS 6-7-6 40 (13) 21/2 LSS 41 5-7-7 (14) 15 SSK 42 5-7-8 (15) 31/2 Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. R BORING NUMBERS H HaugoGeoTechnicalSevices,LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 1 OF 1 PLEaCIANICAL 13570 Grove Drive, #278 Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, Minnesota DATE STARTED 11128/12 COMPLETED 11/28112 GROUND ELEVATION 869.3 ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 3114 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hallow Stem Abler and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 15 feet W o z ♦ SPT N VALUE U¢ Y N W w 20 40 60 80 ~ac at, Wo pz� PL MC LL Q O J MATERIAL DESCRIPTION wm J g > O K J¢ J FN w .- zy a 7 ow'-- K (7 a z O m 0 O? 20 40 60 80 FINES CONTENT (%) El m a o ❑ 0 20 40 60 80 — Clay, slightly organic, with roots and fibers, black, moist (Topsoil) AU 43 SS 3-4-5 _ 44 (9) 5 h — SS 2-23 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, grey, wet, soft to rather soft. (Glacial Til) 45 (5) 1 SS 1-1-2 46 (3) 10 1-2-23/4 US47S (4) 1114 SS 2-2-3 48 (5) 15 US49S 2-2-3 11/4 (5) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. I Descriptive Terminology of Soil Standard D 2487 -00 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) euedmar+wv,at�ryali •nrfsm„ww a !aria NM4 t0'4anal) fi/RMa10 hA++Alli R OMr. lel X4f`.`..CbM1flf a �'WeeS V Edd 15 }�"dnR awvawva215X sanA ave"wY=swd >w' VP+P aro Ga.Ey.+m!, b' 2Y trax,amda sus apwruk GW GM .xtrFas_^eo graves ren s+6 GW.t3C wee-4rassa R®re'wtn car GP.GN aca^v aa4su peen wN: sa GPt{ scab ysoe:: parr. ra: day e+;e,es CaEi n1 n Ct SA:.x 0W tynU[r GCCiss a SC 5M ao-+e•_Eeagw:c oro: .+f agaxlves MVa4x^a+a e sal ca+>.m 2154 Va.N acb «lin pawf o VbrL aTa Sv.a we Sm l2Ah+n eymd#A^tus Sv. SM w.epbea ta-+.n se S•::SL wearyaaa0 sarrc win car SP -SM twary q-easo sic +wrest SP SC inti p:w.0 Sino M c H a AaarLwp roues paY +- naC/rS Sas sP'+s a Cl ML Ely say . sum4ary tGro 34c µs 1a 20; ail vs and a'wc VaN rrpgy spr.DarwaN ai[N �are23H ow No LOp PaKln�•ua1 seed W't4ndY bgrapnrne esacP �vn2 XrwaVatb 8]0 vam+.MY Ver+' a0P P++as1' bpSW carni P4are pbeMOatww A enf PI < <s a taxa teens A" b+a Pi Pasco A -, YAW Pi pC,i Oe �w a 6o so M Cmeda lot Assigning Group Symbols and —Soft Classification Lobbies Group Names Using Laboratory Tasts • ro GupI Drydersny pct oC O,gan GtWenl WD VAet deme, VJ I Symbol: Group Name ° w Graves Clean Gravels C 2 4 arW ! S C, < 31 GW Wea.g-s0eo gravel =10 v'e m I More ma, 5C% of coarse tracts+ 54, a less fines ' C < 4 Enaya 1 > C > 3 t GP pocly graces gave' iE fetatl1ed or Gravels with fines Fines ciasssN as 04 Its SAH GIA ave'; FpesW as CL a CH GC TC' er rave c No A Breve Mae Ian 12'. fares' ` i4 Sands Clean Sands C 2 6 alto t SC, 53' SW Weu.9rade'd sand - i50% a more of odnse bacnion c.. o' less fees C < 61Sf411a I > C,> 3 c Ste Poor=y graaed s", u E passes saraf wiN fines :sits ciassAy as ML esMH SM Sl+ sar+a' 1, F eyes Gasser as CL or CH SC Clayey sand' %- No 4 sir a Mre than 12Si' w G Silts and Lbys maga^K PI >7aWpcN rn a above 'A' brei 0. Lean clay, PI <4 or POM bSew'A- lset ML ' SAt • _ Lgu c 6rrM Ogg LKSW Wild - Oven tired < 0.75 OL Organ,c tray ePl n w fess than SO m g L' hmd • viol lined OL Organrc s:a' m c Sale and clays Inorganic PI Pots on o above'A' knit CII Fat Cts - PI pip's oeuw'A- ts! MH Elas, C s+.' . . o `o z LWua' hrat LL f 50 a mo*e �gartc MKI batt - wan erred OH ' Organic c+sy < 0 75 Zg Wnd OldneO OH Or — , - Highly Organic Soils Pnmwity agenic reader dark n wbr and organic oda PT Peal euedmar+wv,at�ryali •nrfsm„ww a !aria NM4 t0'4anal) fi/RMa10 hA++Alli R OMr. lel X4f`.`..CbM1flf a �'WeeS V Edd 15 }�"dnR awvawva215X sanA ave"wY=swd >w' VP+P aro Ga.Ey.+m!, b' 2Y trax,amda sus apwruk GW GM .xtrFas_^eo graves ren s+6 GW.t3C wee-4rassa R®re'wtn car GP.GN aca^v aa4su peen wN: sa GPt{ scab ysoe:: parr. ra: day e+;e,es CaEi n1 n Ct SA:.x 0W tynU[r GCCiss a SC 5M ao-+e•_Eeagw:c oro: .+f agaxlves MVa4x^a+a e sal ca+>.m 2154 Va.N acb «lin pawf o VbrL aTa Sv.a we Sm l2Ah+n eymd#A^tus Sv. SM w.epbea ta-+.n se S•::SL wearyaaa0 sarrc win car SP -SM twary q-easo sic +wrest SP SC inti p:w.0 Sino M c H a AaarLwp roues paY +- naC/rS Sas sP'+s a Cl ML Ely say . sum4ary tGro 34c µs 1a 20; ail vs and a'wc VaN rrpgy spr.DarwaN ai[N �are23H ow No LOp PaKln�•ua1 seed W't4ndY bgrapnrne esacP �vn2 XrwaVatb 8]0 vam+.MY Ver+' a0P P++as1' bpSW carni P4are pbeMOatww A enf PI < <s a taxa teens A" b+a Pi Pasco A -, YAW Pi pC,i Oe �w a 6o so M Is 7 4' 0� 10 1s 20 30 40 5o 60 70 so 90 100 110 BOUWeS Liquid limn (LL) Lobbies MENDEN Laboratory Tests DO Drydersny pct oC O,gan GtWenl WD VAet deme, VJ 5 Percent of Sallaabon. 5. wNw.■■ Nah✓81 r+prsbae contain '¢ SG So -,k gavfty LL Lgw.V Ilmn ".+2 C Ctlnesal psi PL Piasic kn1A -e 0 Atgle d internal mcutn MRAF..M Ptaskn!y 'idea '• W uncanhrea psi =,omel P200 `, oassmg 20C 6Ysc SB ngm Ill lip Packet penei!omefLw strangm ts! Is 7 4' 0� 10 1s 20 30 40 5o 60 70 so 90 100 110 Panicle Size Identification BOUWeS Liquid limn (LL) Lobbies 3 1012' Laboratory Tests DO Drydersny pct oC O,gan GtWenl WD VAet deme, VJ 5 Percent of Sallaabon. 5. MC Nah✓81 r+prsbae contain '¢ SG So -,k gavfty LL Lgw.V Ilmn ".+2 C Ctlnesal psi PL Piasic kn1A -e 0 Atgle d internal mcutn PI Ptaskn!y 'idea '• W uncanhrea psi =,omel P200 `, oassmg 20C 6Ysc SB ngm Ill lip Packet penei!omefLw strangm ts! Panicle Size Identification BOUWeS Cva 12' Lobbies 3 1012' GMve4 Menson Ccarse Srito 3' Fine No 4 to 14' Send very Site Coarse No 4 W No 10 MEdelm NO 1 o b No 40 Fere No 40 M No 200 Sal INC 2D^u. Pt<4a ben"A'he Clay <No 200 PI24and tin o above A' Ise Relative Density of Cohesioniess Soils Very loose CIO 4 BPF loose 5 to 10 BPF Medr" dense 11 tc 30 BPF Dense 31 as 50 BPF Very aenx ove.• 50 OPF ComistenCy of Cohesive Soils Very soli 010 1 BPF Sol 2W 3 BPF Ramis soil 4 W 5 BPF Menson 6 to B BPF Remo eke 9 M 12 BPF Slid 13 to 16 8PF very Site 17 to 30 BPF Haw ovet 30 BPF Drilling Notes Stannard penetrator lest a cogs wee aovanced Ord 3 IA- a 6 114' ID W. ow stem augers unkess noted otherwise .letbng Ovate was used to Jean OW auger Oro, to sarlpkng only Wnere macated on dgs Standard peneeatmn test bongs are oespnated or the prebs 's7' tSp n Tube) As 5ampes wave taken ram me standard 2' OD spU-tube sampler eacep whe a noted Power auger bOn gs were advanced by 4' a 6- aameer ccmm rs- lrghl soli stem augers SPA CasadcabWs and Saab depths woe e1 - le red hon dsstubed sanplCs MWIts, m the Buda,, wW am. VWOJ M some~ app,manare ppwar suge bcvr,rgs ane designated by the Oreks'B' Hand auger bangs were advanced mamully veldt a 1 1/2' a 3 IM- Cumeief SLOW and web hmtea to the pecan Nan wh this auger COWS be manually wi 4Md Hand auger bongs are aldceled by the PrOw H - BPF: Numbers adlrate blow" par foot recorded In standard peneeabOn ust also known as -W value The sampler was set 6" nb urnnshm Sd Sat Witley me hblpW.sIM1a11gM Dlwetg rKBtanLea wee elan CpntYi la sermd and Ihaa 6- axrements and added to gel BPF vines they arlered sgnitrantly map are rapoted m sere bibtnnp Ism V121w ire second arab Tad6 muemenb respecUvey, NAI: %W no cities die sampler penetbw SO, uoer weght of vedette and rasa alone dhvI g not requ ec WR; WR sdoabs me sampe peneirWeo sod vOOw weght In cads a;One hammer w119 -V ane on" nd regu:,eC TW rrocaY5 in,wa",C irmd6:urbea) Ube sa^.pie Note. Al: tesui wee ru^ ;n general acco,caMe vnM apphcabe ASTM s'a++danls Re, 'V, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 JEURISSEN IST ADDITION Prelimina Chanhassen, Minnesota May 17, 2013 Plan Property Owner: Lennar 16305 36th Avenue N., Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 Consultant to Project Owner: Pioneer Engineering, P.A PINEERen 'neerin 2422 Enterprise Drive gt g Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 17 2013 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT SCANNED I 1 1 I. Introduction ' The following is a hydrology summary for the construction of a combined 32 unit single family home and 26 unit duplex townhome development to be called Jeurissen 1s` Addition. The site is located in the southeast of the intersection of Bluff Creek Boulevard and River Rock Drive North ' and north of Trunk Highway No. 212, in Chanhassen, Minnesota. An offsite street connection will be required to access the site from Bluff Creek Boulevard. t The current project proposes construction of the residential units on the north portion of the site, with the southern portion placed in an outlot and left alone. Therefore, this study only covers the northern development. 1 ' U. Existing Site Conditions The site was a farmstead approximately 26 acres in size. On the east side, a farm yard area is located with a house and farm facility structures, a large cultivated field is located on the north portion and a smaller field is located on the south portion of the site. Bluff Creek runs through middle of the site from west to east. The low area around the creek is wooded. A large wooded t preserve is located north of the site. This site has approximately 70 feet of relief, from a high knob just north of the site in the wooded preserve, down to Bluff Creek on the south side of the site. 1 There are four drainage areas on the site, and an additional area is included for the access street. These areas can be seen on the attached existing hydrology map. The fust drainage area (1S) ' covers approximately 10.0 acres and drains southwest to Bluff Creek. The second drainage area (2S), of 7.8 acres, drains south also to Bluff Creek. The third area (3S), of 3.5 acres drains southeast into Highway 212s drainage ditch in the highways right of way. It should be noted the ' cattle pen in the farm yard drains into an existing manure lagoon pond, also in the state right of way. The fourth area (5S) of 4.2 acres drains to the northeast into a large wetland complex. The offsite area (4S) of 4.6 acres is located northwest of the site and drains into an existing retention ' basin. The assumption is this existing basin was sized for the existing of site development and future "build out' development north of the connection road. In addition, some minor drainage ' enters the site from the offsite northern woodland preserve. A review of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Services Soils Survey; maps the site ' with several groups; the Kilkenny -Lester Loam, Lester-Kilkeenny Clay Loam s and Hamel Loams. Both of these groups are classified as clay according to the Unified Soil Classification System and are associated with moraines and the Minnesota River Flood Plain. This information was confirmed by soil borings performed by Haugo GeoTechnical Services and contained their Geotechnical Exploration Report dated December 20, 2012. The report can be found in Appendix D. 1 1 I C 11 1 1 1 M. Proposed Site Conditions The proposed development consists of a combined 32 unit single family home and 26 unit duplex townhome development with the extension of Rock Creek Drive off of Bluff Creek Boulevard. The general internal layout is a loop street with the townhomes on the east side, and single family on the south, west and only the southern side of the north portion. Two Cul -de - Sacs off of these roads completes the site. The drainage under the proposed conditions was designed to mirror, as closely as possible, the existing drainage pattern. The comparable drainage areas are: Drainage Areas Existing Proposed 1S vs 1R Southwest 10.0 acres 6.0 acres 2S vs 2R South 7.8 acres 11.8 acres 3S vs 3R Southeast 3.5 acres 2.7 acres 5S vs 5R(Northeast) 4.2 acres 1.3 acres 4R vs 4R x. Basin 4.6 acres 8.4 acres Three Stormwater basins are proposed to treat the stormwater for the development. Pond 1 treats (1 S) water before discharging to Bluff Creek, Pond 2 treats (2S) water before discharging to Bluff Creek, Pond 3 treast (3R) water before discharging to the MNDOT ditch, and Pond 4 (existing) treast (4R) water before discharging to Bluff Creek. IV. Design Considerations The City of Chanhassen Stormwater Management Ordinance requires all new developments to meet quality, flow rate requirements. These requirements are summarizes as follows: 1. Rate Control - The proposed flow rate from the proposed development shall not exceed the flow rate of the existing drainage areas for the two, ten and 100 year storm events. 2. Water Quality- Best management practices are required to reduce the Total Suspended Solids (TSS) by 80% and Total Phosphorous by 60%. 3. Stone Sewer Conveyance System —Designed to handle a 10 Year Stone Event. ' V. Results 1 1 Topographic information was field located by Pioneer Engineering. The basins were sized to meet NURP standards with the use of HydroCAD, a SCS TR -20 based computer model was utilized for the hydrology study. P8 a stormwater quality model was used to quantify the removal efficiency of BMP's used in the design. The following table is a comparison of the required wet volume required by NURP Standards and the size provided for the Site. I 1 Wet Volume Requirement Basin Volume Required Ac*Ft Volume Provided Ac*Ft 1P 0.66 1.12 2P 0.99 1.58 3P 0.12 0.12 The following table is a summary of the results of the various HydroCAD models. The individual model results, drainage maps and ancillary supporting documents are attached for your review. Drainage 2-Yeaz cfs 10-Yeaz cfs 100 -Year cfs Area Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed 1 8.81 1.73 22.37 3.76 41.78 5.57 2 8.11 5.96 19.32 13.57 35.03 21.97 3 6.00 1.21 12.97 2.49 22.34 3.58 5 3.83 1.95 9.67 4.16 18.03 7.13 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 The flow rate for all design storm events are reduced from the existing condition. The results ' from the HydroCAD model can be found in Appendix A. To evaluate 80% TSS reduction and 60%TP criteria a P8 model was created. Local climate data ' for the 20 year lifetime design (1974-1994), sequence were used to compile the results. The stromwater system provides a relative 83.49% TSS and 69.06% TP removal for the design lifetime. Results from the P8 model can be found in Appendix B. ' Additional plans and supporting documentation can be found in Appendix C. 1 F fJ I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 Appendix A Hydrocad Model !\; .g§ . .r � � \ � � )§i\ �; - . §/ )/ )� !\; .g§ . .r � � \ � � ( �; 112289 Existing Hydrology Typell24-hr 1 -Year Ra/nfalf=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdroCADS 10.90 tun 00590 02011 HvdmCAD Susware Solutions LLC Pane 3 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: S.Flow off site Runoff - 5.14 cfs ® 12.07 hm, Volume= 13,526 cf, Depth> 0.47' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-20.00 hire. dt- 0.05 hre Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Rainfall -2.30' Area (4 CN Descnp6on 21,057 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 7,743 98 Paved perking, HSG C 4,170 96 Gravel surface, HSGC 256.194 74 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG C 52.766 74 >75% Gress cover, Good, HSG C 341,932 75 Weighted Average 334,189 97,74% Pervious Area 7,743 2.26%Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f7M) (Po6ec) We) 13.3 1,005 0.0776 1.26 LegICN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116/2013 HVdroCADO 10 W sin W690 02011 HvdmCAD Software Solutions LLC Peas 4 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: WE Flow off site Runoff 4.08 cis ® 11.97 hrs, Volume- 7,578 cf, Depth> 0.59" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00.20.00 hra, dt- 0,05 hre Type II 24 -hr 1 -Year Rainfall -2,30" Area (at) CN Descripbon 17,507 98 Paved parking, HSG C 9,188 98 Gravel surface, HSG C 63,020 74 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG C 88,548 74 >75% Grass cover. Good, HSG C 153.261 78 Weighted Average 135,754 08.58% Pervious Area 17,507 11.42% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (tem (fhlec) (cls) 5.0 320 0.0750 1.118 Leg/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr i -Year Rainfall=2.30' Prepared by Microsoft Primed 5116/2013 HvdroCAD010.00 am 00590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 5 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Flow to Ex. Pond Runoff 3.15 cls ® 12.01 hrs. Volume- 6,783 cf. Depth> 0.41" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.0020.00 hrs, dt• 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 1 -Year Rainfall -2.30 - Area (at) CN Description 136,589 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 63.451 70 woods. Good HSG C 200,040 73 Weighted Average 200,040 10000% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fVsec) (pia) 7.7 560 0.1020 1.21 Lag/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Rainfall=2.30' Prepared by Microsoft Panted 5/10/2013 HydmCADO1000 sM0059002011 HydroCADSoftwareSolutions LLC Pape6 Summary for Subcatchment 5S: NE Flow off Site Runoff • 2.32 cfs ® 12.07 hrs, Volume= 6,174 cf, Depth> 0.41' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt• 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 1 -Year Rainfall -2.210" Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (Msec) (cfs) 12.6 890 0.0800 1.18 Leg/CN Method, M = r = = = = = = = = = = = = M 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Rainl911=2.30' Prepared by Microsoft Piloted 511&2013 HYdroCADOIOOD s1n00590 O2011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace Summary for Reach 4R: Ex Pond Inflow Area 200,040 e/, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 0.00' for 1 -Year event Inflow = 0.00 cra ® 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0 of Outflow = 0.00 cfs ® 5.00 hre, Volume= 0 or, Aften= 0%, Leg- 0.0 min Routing by Slor4nd-Trans method, Time Span- 5.00-20.00 hro, dt• 0.05 his 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Rainlall=2.30' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511812013 HydroCAD01000 sm 00560 02011 HydroCAD SoftwareSolutions LLC Pane 8 Summary for Pond 41s: Ex. Pond N4 Inflow Area 200,040 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth 0.41' for 1 -Year event Inflow 3.15 cls a 12.01 hro, Volume- 5,783 G Outflow 0.00 cls C 5.00 hro, Volume- 0 or, Aften 100%, Lag- 0.0 min Primary • 0.00 de ® 5.00 hre, Volume- 0 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Spen• 5.0620.00 hre, dl• 0.05 hre Peek Elev- 870.20'C 20.00 him Surf.Aree= 33,534 sf Storage- 8,778 of Plug -Flow detention time- (not calculated: initial storage excedes outflow) Center -of -Mees det. time- (not calculated: no outflow) Volume Invert Aveil.Sloraos Storege Description ai 870.00' 281,808 cr Custom stage Data (Prtama0c)Llsted below (Reeelc) Elevation Surf.Aree Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (w -ft) fcublWeet) (cubiWee0 870.0) 32,835 0 0 872.00 39,885 72.520 72,520 874.00 47,071 88,758 159,278 875.00 55,259 102,330 2ei,50e R1 Primary 074.80' 25.0' long x 15.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Heed (feen 0.20 0.40 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.80 Coef. (English) 2.98 2.70 2.70 2.61 2.03 2.04 2.54 2.83 zImary OutFlow Max -0.00 cta Q 5.00 him HW -870.00' (Free Discharge) 1 -Broad -Crested Rectangular WSIr(Controle cob cis) 112289 Existing Hydrology Type l/ 24 -hr 2 -Veer Reim'811=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 HvdroCAD010,00 9/n00590 02011 HydmCAD SoffeereSdutions LLC Pape 9 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: SW Flow off Site Runoff • 8.81 cis Q 12.07 me, Volume- 22,851 of, Depth> 0.63" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-20.00 Inns, dt= 0.05 hoe Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.75" 438,080 73 Weighted Average 438,060 100.00% Pervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Deecnption (min) (feet) Win (Msec) (of$) 13.5 980 0.0806 1.21 Lap/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116/2013 HvdroCAD01000 a/n0059002011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 10 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: S.Flow off site Runoff B.11 cis @ 12.06 hre, Volume= 20.418 ci, Depth, 0.72" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.0D-20.00 has, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 2 -Veer Rainfall=2.75" 7,743 88 Paved parking. HSG C 4,170 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 256,184 74 Pasture/grasslendlrange, Good, HSG C 52.768 74 75% Grass cover Good HSGC 341,832 75 Weighted Average 334,189 97.74%Pervious Area 7,743 2.26% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Descnptlon (min) (feet) (fl/ft) (fVsec) (cis) 13.3 1,005 0.0778 1.26 Leg/CN Method, M M== M M M M M w= M= M 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Panted 5/1012013 HvdroCAD010.00 am 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Sdutlons LLC Pace 11 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: WE Flow off site Runoff = 8.00 cis® 11.98 hrs. Volume= 11,037d, Depth> 0.86- 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Pdnted 511612013 HvdmCADO 10.00 sm 00590 02011 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 12 Summery for Subcatchment 4S: Flow to Ex. Pond Runoff = 5.12 cis CD 12.00 hre, Volume- 10,514d, Depth> 0.83' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 Inns, dt- 0.05 hre Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span= 5.00.20.00 Inn, dt- 0.05 hm Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall -2.75" Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall -2.75" 153,2el 78 weighted Average 135,754 88.58% Pervious Area 17,507 11.42% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Win (f0aec) (ds) 5.0 320 0.0750 1.08 Lag/CN Method, To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (RM) (fusec) We) 7.7 580 0,1020 1.21 LagICN Method, . � /U 1t§%: _|■e/� ®)§ !\ • . � M r L M M M 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainf911=2.75' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116/2013 HvdmCADO 10,00 a/o 00590 m 2011 HydroCAD Schwan, Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Pond 4P: Ex. Pond N4 Inflow Area 200,040 if, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 0.83" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 5.12 cfs ® 12.00 h s, Volume- 10,514 cf Outflow = 0.00 cfs ® 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cl, Aften- 100%, Lag- 0.0 min Primary 0.00 ds a 5.001l Volume- 0 or Routing by Stor-Intl method, Time Span- 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt• 0.05 hrs Peak Elev- 870.31' t@ 20.00 hrs Sud.Ama- 33,913 of Storage- 10,5D4 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: Initial storage excedes outflow) Canter-af-Mese det. time= (not calculated: no outflow) Volume Invert Avall.Slomoe Storage Description si 870.00' 261,606 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation SurfArea Inc.Store Cum.Slore (feet) (sq -ft) (cublo-fee0 (cubic-fee0 870.00 32,835 0 0 872.00 39.685 72.520 72.520 874.00 47,071 88,756 159,276 875.00 55,259 102,330 281,808 Device Routing Inver! Outlet Devlces si Primary 874,60' 25.0' long x 15.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.80 0.50 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.65 2.70 2.70 2,64 2.83 2.64 2.84 2.53 Ptrimary OutFlow Mex=0.00 cfs a 5.00 hra HW=870.00' (Free Discharge) 11•13mad-Created Rectangular Welr( Controls 0.00 cfe) M = M 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1) 24 -hr 5 -Year Rainfall -3.55' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HydloCAD®10.00 ./n00580 02011 HydroCAD Sonwere Sdutlons LLC Pace 18 Summary for Subcalchment 1S: SW Flow off Site Runoff 15.95 cis Q 12.06 me, Volume- 39,745 cf, Depth> 1.09" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-20.00 hrs, al= 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 5 -Year Rainfall=3.55" Area (at) CN Descripflon 304,505 74 Pasture)gresslandminge, Good, HSG C 131.555 70 Woods, Good, HSG C Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fl/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.5 900 0.0806 1.21 Lag)CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type // 24 -hr 5 -Year Rainfall=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5H8/2013 HvdroCADS 10.00 an 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Sonware Solutions LLC Page 17 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: S.Flow off site Runoff • 14.05 da a 12.08 hrs, Volume= 34,517 of, Depth> 1.21" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span- 5.00.20.00 hm, dt• 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 5 -Year Rainfall -3.55" Area (91) CN Description 21,057 70 Woods, Good. HSG C 7,743 98 Paved perking, HSG C 4,170 98 Gravel surface, HSG C 258,194 74 Pasture/grossland/range, Good, HSG C 7,743 2.26% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (minl (feet) (Nrl) (f /sec) (de) 13.3 1,005 0.0770 1.28 Lag/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Rainfall=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 HvdroCADO 10.D0 $M 00590 O2011 HvdroCAD Soft... Solutions LLC Pace 18 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: WE Flow off site Runoff • 9.74crs® 11.98hre, Volume= 17.940 d, Depth. 1.40" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS. Time Span= 5.00.20.00 Iva, dt• 0.05 hrs Type It 24 -hr 5 -Year Rainfall -3.55" 17,507 98 Paved parking, HSG C 8,188 98 Gravel surface. HSG C 83,020 74 Pasture/gresslandhange, Good, HSG C 66,548 74 >75% Gress cover, Good HSGC 153,2el 78 Weighted Average 135,754 88.58% Pervious Area 17,507 11.42% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Win (Msec) (cra) 5.0 320 0.0750 1.09 Lag/CN Method, W = = = = W 112289 Existing Hydrology Type// 24 -hr 5 -Year Ra/nfall=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed SM612013 HVdroCADO 19.00 sin 00.590 02011 HydmCAD Software SoMions LLC Pace 1 B Summary for Subcetchment 4S: Flow to Ex. Pond Runs 9.12 cfs (ill 12.00 me, Volume- 18,280d, Depth- 1.10 - Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-20.00 hre, dt- 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 5 -Year Rainfall -3.55' Area (an CN DearAp6on 136.589 74 >75% Gress cover, Good. HSG C 200.040 100.00% PerAous Area Tc Length Slope Velody Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f1/11) (Msec) (da) 7.7 560 0.1020 1.21 Lap/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type /124 -hr 5 -Year Relnfe//=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HydroCADO10.00 W00590 02011 HydmCAD Software Sdutlons LLC Pace 20 Summary for Subcetchment 53: NE Flow off She Runoff • 6.91 cis ® 12.05 hre, Volume- 18,648 cf. Depth, 1.09" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Tlms Span= 5.00-20.00 me, dt• 0.05 me Type II 24 -hr &Year Rainfall -3.55" Area (et) CN DescrioHon 157,849 74 Pasture/grassland/range. Good, HSG C 182,580 100.00% Per Wous Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _(min) (feet) (ftM) (f/sec) (cls) 12.6 880 0.0800 1.18 Lag/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type// 24 -hr &Year Rainfal1=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdmCAD010.00 s/n 00590 02011 HvdroCAD SoftwareSolutions LLC Page 21 Summary for Reach 4R: Ex Pond Inflow Area 200,040 at, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 0.00" for 5 -Year event Inflow • 0.00 cis C 5.00 hre, Volume- 0 d Outflow 0.00 da ® 5.00 hre, Volume- 0 cf, Allen= 0%, Lea= 0.0 min Routing by Stor4nd-Trans method, Time Span= 5.00.20.00 line, dt- 0.05 Ire 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Reinfell=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 51, 8/2013 HydmCAD01000 sin 00590 O 2011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Summary for Pond 4P: Ex. Pond #4 Inflow Area = 200,040 sr, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.10" for 5 -Year event Inflow = 9.12 cfs Q 12.00 hre, Volume- 18,280 of Ouglow = 0.00 cis ® 5.00 hro, Volume= 0 d, Aften- 100%, Lag- 0.0 min Primary 0.00 chat ® 5.00 hro, Volume- 0 cr Routing by Slor-Intl method, Time Span- 5.00.20.00 hre, dl• 0.05 hrs Peek Elev= 870.54' C 20.00 him Surf.Area• 34,588 of Storage= 18,267 of Plug -Flow detention time, (not calculated: Initial storage excedes outfil Center -of -Mass det. time- (not calculated: no outflow) Volume Invert Avall Sloreae Storage Description ei 870.00' 281,608 of Custom Stage Date (Prismatic)Listed below (Recelc) Elevation SurfArea Inc.Store Cum.Slore (fee0 (sq -ft) Icublo-fee0 (cublo-teen 870.00 32,835 0 0 872.00 39,685 72,520 72,520 874.00 47,071 66,756 159,276 876.00 55,259 102.330 261,606 Device Routing Invert Oudel Devices Nt Primary 874.60' 26.0' long x 16.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Prlmary OutFlow Max=0.00 cis a 5.00 him HW -870.00' (Free Discharge) 1 -Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 de) = = = M = = = = = s = = = M = = = = 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rain/all=4.20" 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfafl--4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/10@013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 HydroCADO 10.00 am 00590 02011 HvdmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 23 HvdruCAD910.00 em 00590 02011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pepe 24 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: SW Flow off Site Summary for Subcatchment 2S: S.Flow off site Runoff • 22.37 cis ® 12.08 hre. Volume- 55,198d, Deplh> 1.52" Runoff 19.32 cis a 12.08 hre, Volume- 47,241 cf, Depth> 1.89" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS. Time Span- 5.00-20.00 hre, dt- 0.05 hre Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS. Time Span- 5.00-20.00 hre, dt• 0.05 hre Type 1120 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall -4.20" Type 1124 -hr 1D -Veer Rainfall=4.20" Area (at) CN Description Area (at) CN Description 304,505 74 Pasture/greselend/range, Good, HSG C 21,057 70 Woods, Gootl, HSG C 131.555 70 Woods, Good. HSG C 7,743 98 Paved perking, HSG C 438,080 73 Weighted Average 4,170 90 Gravel surface, HSG C 438,080 100.00% Pervious Area 258,194 74 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG C 52.708 74 >75% Grass rover. Good, HSG C To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 341,932 75 Weighted Average (min) (feet) (1tM) ((Neat) lots) 334,109 97.74% Pervious Area 13.5 980 0.0000 1.21 LagICN Method, 7,743 2.26% impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Deecdpflw (min) (feet) (fIM) (a/sec) We) 13.3 1,005 0.0770 1.28 LagICN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Typel124-hr 14Yeer Ra/nla/h-4.20' Prepared by Mlorosoft Printed 51182013 HydmCAD910.00 SM 00690 02011 HydMCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 25 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: WE Flow off site Runoff 12.97 ab a 11.96 hre, Volume- 24,054 d, Deplh> 1 All" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS. Time Span- 5.00-20.00 Ins, dl• 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 10 -Veer Rainfall -4.20" Area (s0 CN Description 17,507 98 Paved parking, HSG C 6,188 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 63,020 74 Pasture/oressland/range, Good, HSG C 135,764 88.58% Pervious Area 17,507 11.42% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (bet) (RM) (Neat) (cis) 5.0 320 0.0750 1.08 Lag/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1/24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/162013 HydroCAD810130 sM 00590 172011 HydruCAD SoftwareSolutions LLC Pace 26 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Flow to Ex. Pond Runoff 12.69 cis a 12.00 hre, Volume= 25,381 cf, Depth> 1.52" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, LH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00.20.00 hre, dta 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" 200,040 73 Weighted Average 200,040 100.00% Pervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity DsaOdptIW (min) (feet) (ftm) Waec) (CIS) 7.7 560 0.1020 1.21 Lag/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microstaa Printed 5/19/2013 HYdroCADO 1p.00 SM 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Summary for Subcatchment 5S: NE Flow off Site Runoff 6.97 cis a 12.05 his, Volume- 23,119 cf, Deplh> 1.52" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span= 5.00.20.00 hra, dt- 0.05 has Type II 24hr 10 -Year Rainfall -4.20" Area (at) CN Description 157,649 74 Pasture/grasalendminge, Good, HSG C 182,580 100.00% Pervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Dascnptlon (min) (feet) (IIA) (fusec) (del 12.8 890 0.0800 1.18 Lil Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Reinfell=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Primed 5118/2013 HydfoCAD®10.00 am 00590 02011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Summary for Reach 4R: Ex Pond Inflow Area 200,040 sf, 0.00%Impervious, Inflow Depth• 0.00" for 10 -Year event Inflow • 0.00 cls C 5.00 hre, Volume= 0 of Outflow 0.00 ch Q 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0 c1, A9en- 0%, Lag- 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trane method, Time Span= 5.00.20.110 his, dt= 0.05 h s 112289 Existing Hydrology Type I/ 24 -hr 10. Year Rainfall=4 20' 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5'1612013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdroCAD010.00 s/n 00590 02011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Peas 2B HrdroCADO 10 W sm 00590 02011 Hy MCAD Software Solutions LLC Peas 30 Summary for Pond 4P: Ex. Pond #4 Inflow Area 200,040 sf. 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 1.52" for 10 -Year event Inflow 12.69 ds ® 12.00 his, Volume- 25,381 or Outflow = 0.00 de ® 5.00 hrs, Volume- 0 d, After- 100%, Leg= 0.0 min Primary = 0.00 cis ® 5.00 hint, Volume= 0 d Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00.20.00 his, dl= 0.05 him Peak Elev- 870.74' C 20.00 hre Surf.Area• 35,382 at Storage= 25,363 of Plug -Flow detention time, (not calculated: Initial storage excedes outflow) Center -of -Mesa dot. time• (not calculated; no outflow) Volume Inver Avell.Storeae Storage Description a1 870.00' 281,008 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Usted below (Recalc) Elevation Sud.Area Inc.Slore Cum.Store (feel) (sq -ft) (cublo-feet) (wblo-fee0 870.00 32,835 0 0 872.00 39,685 72,520 72,520 874.DD 47,071 86,756 159,278 878.00 55,259 102,330 261,606 Device Routing Inver Outlet Devices #1 Primary 874.60' 211 x 15.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Wsir Head (feel) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coal. (English) 2.88 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Primary OulFlow Mex=0.00 of* C 5.00 hre HW870.0O (Free Discharge) 1 -Broad -Crested Rectangular Wslr(Conlrols 0.00 da) Summary for Subcatchment 1S: SW Flow off Site Runoff = 41.78 ds Q 12.06 his, Volume- 103,177 cf, Depth> 2.84 Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Spen= 5.00.20.00 his, dt= 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Relmall=8.00' Area (of) CN Description 304,505 74 Pasture/grassland/range, Good. HSG C 131,565 70 Woods Good HSG C 436,080 73 Weighted Avera0e 436,060 1DD.00% Pervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) MM) (Nese) (ds) 13.5 980 0.0806 1.21 Lap/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511 612 01 3 HvdroCAD910 00 a/n 00590 0 2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 31 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: S.Flow off site Runoff = 35.03 da C 12.05 furs, Volume- 68,224 or, Depth> 3.03" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-20.00 hre, dt- 0.05 firs Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall -6.00" 7,743 98 Paved parking, HSG C 4,170 99 Gravel surface, HSG C 258,194 74 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG C 334,169 97.74% Pervious Area 7,743 2.26% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft6n (flusec) (cfe) 13.3 1,005 0.0776 1.26 Lag/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Ra/nfalt-6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HydroCADO /0.00 s/n 00590 02011 Hydro AD Software Solutions LLC Pane 32 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: WE Flow off site Runoff = 22.34 ch Q 11.96 hre, Volume- 42,430 cf, Depth> 3.32" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS. Time Span= 5.00-20.00 him. of- 0.05 hm Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfa11=8.00' Area (at) CN Description 17,507 98 Paved parking, HSG C 6,186 98 Gravel surface, HSG C 83,020 74 Pasture/gressland/range, Good, HSG C 17.507 11.42% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Descrlptim (min) (feet) (fUft) (f9sec) (da) 5.0 320 0.0760 1.05 Lag/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Peer Rainfall=5.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511512013 HydroCAD010.00 sh 00580 C2011 HYdroCAD Software SciuWns LLC Pace 33 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Flow to Ex. Pond Runoff 23.43 cls a 11.99 Iva. Volume- 47,430 ci, Depth> 2.85" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 Ins, dt= 0.05 has Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=5.00" Area (4 CN Description 138,589 74 >75% Gress cover, Good, HSG C To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (Nft) (ft/sec) (ds) 7.7 580 0.1020 1.21 Lag/CN Method, 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Reinrafl=5.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511WO13 H droCAD01g 00 sin 00590 02011 HydroCAD Sonware Solutions LLC Paco 34 Summary for Subcatchment 53: NE Flow off Site Runoff • 18.03 cis ® 12.05 hn, Volume- 43.215d, Depth> 2.86' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span- 5.100-20.00 has, di- 0.05 h. Type It 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=8.00" Area (et) CN D pt' 157,848 74 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG C 24,931 70 woods Good, HSGC _ 182,580 73 Weighted Average 182,580 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ftm) (f/sec) lots) 12.8 890 0.0800 1.18 Lsg1CN Method, M ! = = M = = = = = = = M = M = M = M 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printso 5/162013 HvdroCA0010 W sln 00590 02011 HydroCAD SoftwareSdubone LLC Peas 35 Summary for Reach 4R: Ex Pond Inflow Area • 200,040 of. 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth • 0.00" for 100-Yearevent Inflow, 0.00 ds ® 5.00 bra. Volume= 0 d OuMow • 0.00 de ® 5.00 hre. Volume= 0 d, Aeen= 0%, Lag- 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind-Trens method, Time Span= 5.00.20.00 bra, dl• 0.05 bra 112289 Existing Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Panted 5/182013 HvdroCAD010. W sin 00590 02011 HvdmCAD SoftwareSdulbne LLC Pane 36 Summary for Pond 4P: Ex. Pond #4 Inflow Area 200,040 at, 0.00%Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.85" for 100 -Year event Inflow 23.43 ds Q 11.99 hre, Volume- 47,430 d Outflow = 0.00de® S.00hre, Volume= Od, Aften=100%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.00 de (M 5.00 hre, Volume= 0 or Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span- 5.00-20.00 hro, dt• 0.05 bra Peak Elev 871.35'Q 20.00 bra Surf.Area• 37,454 of Storage- 47,402 d Plug -Flow detention time• (not calculated Initial storage excedes oudlow) Center -of -Maes det. time- (not calculated: no outflow) Volume Invert Avail.Storaoe Stmeoe Description #1 870.00' 281,608 of Custom Stage Data (Pnama6c)Llated below (Rooli c) Elevation Sun.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cublofee0 (cublo-fee0 870.00 32,835 0 0 872.00 38,685 72,520 72,520 874.00 47,071 85,756 159,275 878.00 55,259 102,330 261,606 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 874.80' 25.0' long x 16.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (fast) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Cod, (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.84 2.64 2.63 Primary OutFlow Mm -0.00 cis Q 5.00 bra HW=870.00' (Free Discharge) LI•Broed-Created Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 de) S +♦ 4S � i ` i 4P • ■ ■ > --------------- FlR • c ■ ti - �#�^-&���� ���\ Fav n ; � �i` .r'R� ♦� __ - _"_�__.�. g- ys�-ate 3y. ?- �'ti � <tk� id ♦ ._ �+e'tc r LST 1 \ � �''y'(\ � ♦ =�T� , .1 V F1µ c ■ a 1 n PIONEEReneneei ing �EFS ..om..++� (6511661-1914 �fmmn xaieoaw sslm y, x:661-9466 Om)3r�rm.em rmm�mm• � L l a'T {.-£, �\ \-� `sem 1 r \ �\\�\ mil �� \' a` �� ar •.� ' 1; 1 // - "5i-�.z�_ � \ s t = • ■ ■ • ■ ■ • II✓ s \ r " ,rA/ 1 , III: ill I l �♦ 141 '•,g••• _ - - • �, low Now a'T {.-£, �\ \-� `sem 1 r \ �\\�\ mil �� \' a` �� ar •.� ' 1; 1 // - "5i-�.z�_ � \ s t = • ■ ■ • ■ ■ • II✓ s \ r " ,rA/ 1 , III: ill I l 4ffj —IP 1 se (e.\e 0 re n.,rw rrw anew 1RJ� \ ewrn"ns. 1P Q—�BI weep rwwswe� ���\ `.281 .n w "0_013R1 U2F weu nE rn.asa . w.r.drw ice.. iR S,brar Reach an ILinkl 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1-YearEvenf Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdroCAD010 00 On 00580 02011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 2 Summery for Subcatchment 1S: Flow Into Pond 1 Runoff = 8.70 cis ® 12.02 Ina, Volume= 20,933d, Depth= D.98" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Spen= 5.00.38.00 hrs. dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 21 -hr 1 -Veer Event Rainfall -2.30" 108,226 00.73% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velodty Capacity Description (min) (feet) (h(ft) (ft/sec) (cfa) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Event Ramfell=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/1612013 HvdroCA0010.W Un 00590 02011 HvdroCAD SottwereSdutions LLC Pepe 3 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Flow Into Pond 2 Runoff = 13.17 cls ® 12.02 hre, Volume- 31,682 cl, Depth= 0.98" Runoff by SCS TR.20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-30.00 hre, dl= 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 1 -Veer Event Rainfall -2.30' Area (so CN Description 150,767 98 Water Surface, HSG C 198,880 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 29,899 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 15,189 98 Water Surface, HSG C 394,495 84 Weighted Average 228,559 57.94% Pervious Area 185,936 42.06% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (") (flesec) Will 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfall=2.30' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116/2013 HydroCADO 10.00 sin 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 4 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Flow Into Pond 3 Runoff - 1.55 cis ® 12.02 hrs, Volume- 3,726 cf, Depth= 1.02" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS. Time Span- 5.00-36.00 hre, dt- 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr i -Year Event Rainfall=2.30' Area (efi CN Description 18.991 98 Paved perking, HSG C 23,431 74 »5% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 3,350 98 Water Surface, HSG C 43,772 85 Weighted Average 23,431 53.53% Pervious Area 20,341 46.47% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (Nm (/Vsec) ids) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type /124 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfell=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdroCAD610.00 sm 00590 C2011 HvdroCAD SoftwareSdulbos LLC Pepe 5 Summary for Subcatchment 20S: S. Rear Yard Flow Runoff 2.60 cls Q 12.03 hra, Volume- 6,511 of, Depth- 0.68" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 hre, dt= 0.05 him Type II 24 -hr 1 -Year Event Ralnfell=2.30" Area (s0 CN Description 19,211 98 Paved parking. HSG C 98,937 74 -75% Grass cover. Good HSGC 118,148 78 Weighted Average 98,937 83,74% Pervious Area 19,211 16.26% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Desiripllon (min) (feet) (Na) (ft/sec) (cis) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124-hr1-Year Event Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Primed 5116/2013 HydruCADV 10,00 sin 00590 ® 2011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 9 Summary for Subcatchment 30S: SE Rear Yards Runoff • 1.67 ch; Q 12.03 hrs, Volume- 4,179 of, Depth= 0.88" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-38.00 hra, dl• 0.05 Ins Type II 24 -hr 1 -Veer Event Rainfall -2.30" 75.830 78 Weighted Average 64,417 84.95% Pervious Area 11,413 15.05% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Desorption (min) (feet) 01M) (ft/sec) (ae) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Panted 5/782013 HYdroCADS 10.00 W 00590 02011 HvdmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 7 Summary for Subcatchment 40S: Connection Flow Runoff • 6.82 de ® 12.03 his, Volume- 17,519d. Depth= 0.58" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.D0-38.00 his, dt• 0.05 hre Type 1124 -hr 1 -Veer Event Rainfall=2.30" Ama(st) CN Description 48,380 98 Paved parking, HSG C 190,828 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 318,145 87.28% Pervious Area 48,350 12.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (M) (a/sec) (ds) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfe0=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdroCADO 10.00 On 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 8 Summary for Subcatchment 50S: NE Rear Yards Runoff 1.34 ds ® 12.03 hire, Volume- 3,312 cf, Depth- 0.71' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.0636.00 his, dt• 0.05 hm Type II 24 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfall -2.30' Area (so CN Description 12,443 96 Paved parking, HSG C 43,817 74 >75%Grasscover. Good. HSGC 58,260 79 Weighted Average 43,817 77.88% Pervious Area 12,443 22.12% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Desodption (min) (feet) (11111) (fusec) (ds1 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type It 24 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfell=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/1612013 HydroCADO 10.00 sM 00.590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Page B Summary for Reach 1R: SW Flow off Site Inflow Area= 260,820 St, 40.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 0.82" for 1 -Year Event event Inflow • 1.06 cfa a 12.52 hrs, Volume= 19,947 of Outflow 1.06 cis Q 12.52 hrs, Volume- 19,947 ci, Aften= 0%, Leg- 0,0 min 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Typel124-hr 1 -Year Event Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511612013 HydroCAD01000 W00590 O2011 HydroCADSOftwereSolution LLC Paae 10 Summary for Reach 2R: S. Flow off Site Inflow Area= 512,843 at. 36.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 0.87" for 1 -Year Event event Inflow 3.72 cis Q 12.06 him, Volume- 37,328 of Outflow • 3.72 cfs ® 12.06 hrs, Volume- 37,326 cf, Allen= 0%, Lag- 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Intl+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-38.00 hrs, dim 0.05 hrs Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method. Time Span= 5.00.30.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs M M M M M M M M M M M M i M s M M M M 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 HydmCAD810 W s/n 00590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summery for Reach 3R: SE Flow off Site Inflow Area = 119,802 of, 28.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.79" for 1 -Veer Event event Inflow = 2.28 do a 12.05 his, Volume- 7,903 d Outflow = 2.28 ds gl 12.05 hre, Volume- 7,903 d, Afton- 0%, Lag- 0.0 min 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124-hr1-Year Event Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 HvdroCA0010.00 sin 00590 02011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Reach 4R: Ex. Pond Inflow Area 384,495 of, 12.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth• 0.00" for 1 -Year Event event Inflow = 0.00 cfs ® 5.00 hre, Volume- 0 d Outflow = 0.00 cis ® 5.00 hra, Volume- 0 d, After- 0%, Lag- 0.0 min Routine by Stor-Ind•Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-35.00 hre, dt- 0.05 hre Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span- 5.00.38.00 hre, di- 0.05 hm M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfall=2.30" 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/1612013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116/2013 HYdroCADO 16.00 sln 00590 02011 HvdmCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 HwdroCADO 10 W am 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 14 Summary for Reach 5R: NE Flow off Site Summary for Pond 1P: Pond s1 Inflow Area • 56,260 ef, 22.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth • 0.71" for 1 -Year Event event Inflow Area = 260,820 ad, 40.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.98" for i -Year Event event Inflow = 1.34 cfe Q 12.03 hre, Volume- 3,312 d Inflow 8.70 cis Q 12.02 hre, Volume- 20,933 cf Outflow 1.34 cis Q 12.03 hre, Volume- 3,312 d, Aften- 0%, Las• 0.0 min Oumow = 1.05 de Q 12.52 hre, Volume- 19,947 d, Aden- BB%. Lep= 29.9 min (cubic -fast) Primary = 1.06 ds ® 12.52 hre, Volume- 19,947 d Routine by Stor-Ind*Trans method, Time Span- 5.00.36.00 hre, dt• 0.05 hre 4,107 0 Time Spar- hre, Routing by Sl r-Ind868. 884.00 of Storage- 48,885 d 8,80. of Starting Elev 988.50' Su 0' Sur, = 14,054 sf 9,945 Peak Elev= 888.14' ®12.52 hre Sud.Arae• 14,970 d Storage- 58,197 at (9,332 d above sled) 2Ints 4,970 at Plug -Flow detention time• (not calculated: Initial storage excedea outflow) Center -of -Masa det. time- 187.5 min ( 1.033.7 - 846.2 ) Volume Invert Avall Storage Storage Description a1 602.01Y107,146 d Custom Stege Date (Prlsmaticy_leted below (Recelc) Elevation SurfArea Inc.Store Cum.Slore (feet) (sa-6) (cubic -fast) (cublofee0 862.00 4,107 0 0 884.00 5,838 9,945 9,945 888.00 7,969 13,807 23,752 867.50 9,719 13,266 37,018 868.00 11,808 5,382 42,400 868.50 14,054 6,488 48,865 869.50 15,478 14,766 63,631 870.00 16,211 7,922 71,554 871.00 17,719 16,965 88,519 872.00 19.535 18,827 107,148 Device Routine Invert Outlet Devices ai Primary 868.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L=22.0 Ke=0.500 Inlet I Outlet Inert -888.50'1868.39' 5=0.0050'( Cc -0.900 n• 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends 8 connections, Flow Area- 0.79 at Primary OutFlow Max -1.05 ds 0 12.52 hre HW=869.14' (Free Discharge) 1•Culved (Barrel Controls 1.05 dS ® 2.81 fps) M = M M M 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type I124-hrf-Year Event Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/162013 HydmCAD010.00 sin 00590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Pond 2P: Pond #2 Inflow Area = 394,495 et 42.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth • 0.98" for 1 -Year Event event Inflow • 13.17 chs Q 12.02 hall, Volume= 31,682 d Outflow 2.12 cis ® 12.38 hre, Volume= 30,814 of, Allen= 54%, La0= 21.4 min Primary 2.12 chs ® 12.38 hre, Volume= 30,814 0l Routing by Star -Ind method, Time Span• 5.00-38.00 his, dt• 0.05 him Sterling Elev- 880.50' Sud.Aree= 17,807 of Storage- 68,953 of Peak Elev- 881,22'C 12.38 hrs Surf.Aree• 18,911 of Storage- 82,176 d (13,223 cf above start) Flood Elev 848.50' Surf.Area• 0 or Storage- 0 d Plug -Flow detention time- (not calculated: Initial storage excetles outflow) Center -of -Mass dal. Bme= 158.4 min ( 1,002.6 - 046.2 ) Volume Invert Avall.Staraoe StoreOa Description #1 874.00' 152,745 of Custom Stage Data (Prlsmatic)Lleted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf -Area Ina Store Cum.Store (fee0 (sq -ft) (cublafee0 (cumo-feen 874.00 6,842 0 0 878.00 8,938 15,780 15,780 878.00 11,2el 20,199 35,979 880.00 13,809 25,070 61,049 880.50 17,807 7,904 98,953 882.00 20,107 28,436 97,389 803.50 22,534 31,981 129,369 804.00 23,372 11,477 140,846 884.50 24,224 11,899 152,745 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices 91 Primary 880.50' 15.0" Round Culvert L- 270.0' Ke- 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Inven• 880.50' / 745.50' S- 0.5000'f Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends 8 connections, Flow Area- 1.23 sf Prlmery OutFlow Mex -2.11 cfs C 12.38 hire HW -881.22' (Free Discharge) L1•Cuivert (Inld Controls 2.11 cis Q 2.89 fps) 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/162013 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 00590 02011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Summary for Pond 3P: Pond #3 Inflow Area 43,772 at, 46.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth• 1.02" for 1 -Year Event event Inflow • 1.55 ds C 12.02 hre, Volume= 3,726 of Outflow • 0.80 cls a 12.14 hrs, Volume- 3,724 of, After- 48%, Lap= 7.5 min Primary = 0.80 cls ® 12.14 hre, Volume- 3,724 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span• 5.00-36.00 hre, dt• 0.05 hrs Sleding Eley 870.50' Sud.Aree= 2,150 d Storage• 1,381 cf Peek Elev 870.96'(M 12.14 him Sud.Area= 2,419 of Slorege• 2,424 cf (1,043 c1 above start) Plug -Flow detention tinge= 272.5 min calculated for 2,343 of (63% of Inflow) Center -of -Maes dot. Bme• 56.7 min ( 899.0 - 042.3) Volume Invert Avail.Storaue Stome Description #1 858.00' 8,633 d Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)l.lsled below (Recalc) Elevation Sud.Aree Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (so -ft) (oublo-fee0 (cubic-fee0 868.00 169 0 0 869.50 042 608 608 870.00 150 198 806 870.50 2,150 575 1,381 872.00 3,034 3,888 5,269 873.00 3,893 3,364 8,833 12.0" Round Culvert L•1Bo' Ke- OSDD Inlet / Outiel Invert- 870.50'1870.00' S• 0.0278'V Cc= 0.900 n• D.013 Concrete pipe, bands S ccnnectlons, Flow Area• 0.79 of rlmary OutFlow Mex=0.80 cis 4D12.14 him HV✓=870.88' (Free Discharge) 7•Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.80 cis ® 2.30 fps) 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type /124 -hr 1 -Year Event Rainfaff=2.30" 112289 Jeudssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511812013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdroCAD01000 s/n 00590 02011 HvdroCAD SoftwareSolutions LLC Fade 17 M d.CAD910 00 sun 00590 92011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 18 Summary for Pond 4P: Ex. Pond #4 Inflow Area • 364,495 of. 12.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth • 0.58" for 1 -Veer Event event Inflow • 5.82 ds ® 12.03 hrs, Volume- 17,519 of Outflow 0.00 de ® 5.00 hrs, Volume- 0 d, Allen• 100%, Leo= 0.0 min Primary 0.00 cis Q 5.00 hrs, Volume- 0 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span- 5. W-38.00 Ins, dM1 0.05 ho Peak Elew 870.52'(M 24.80 hre SurfArea- 34,514 of Storage- 17,517 of Plug -Flow detention Ume• (not calculated: Initial storage excedes oumow) Comer -d -Mase del. sme• (not calculated: no outflow) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 01 870.00' 261,605 d Custom Stage Data (Prlsmado)Llsted below (Recaic) Elevation Surf Ares Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubMeet) (cubicfeeb 870.00 32,835 0 0 872.00 39,885 72,520 72,520 874.DD 47,071 86,756 159,276 875A0 65,259 102,330 281,805 26.0' long x 16.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.84 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max•0.00 ds ® 5.00 hre HW -870.00' (Free Discharge) Lt•Brded-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 ds) Summary for Subeatchment 1S: Flow Into Pond 1 Runoff • 11.61 ds ® 12.02 hre, Volume- 28,543 d, Depth- 1.31" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00.36.00 hue, dl• 0.05 hre Type II 24hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall -2.75" Aro (0 CN Description 95,273 98 Paved parking, HSG C 140,233 74 >75% Gress cover, Good, HSG C 14,361 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 10,953 98 Water Surface HSG C 260,820 84 Weighted Average 154,594 59.27% Pervious Area 109,229 40.73% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (NII) (Msec) (ds) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Reinre11=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 51182013 HydroCAD01000 9n0059002011 HydnoCADSoftware Solutions LLC pace 19 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Flow into Pond 2 Runoff = 18.02 cfa Q 12.02 hrs, Volume- 43,171 of, Depth- 1.31" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Spen= 5.00-38.00 hm, at= 0.05 hrs Type II 24.hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall -2.75" Area flu) CN Description 150,787 98 Water Surface, HSG C 198,880 74 >75% Gress cover, Good, HSG C 29,899 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 15.189 98 Water Surface, HSG C 394,495 84 Weighted Average 228,559 57.94% Pervious Area 185,938 42.06% Impervious Area To Lenges Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (hhn (flusec) (cis) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type If 24 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainisll=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Pentad 5118/2013 HydmCADO 10,00 em 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 20 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Flow Into Pond 3 Runoff 2.10 cfs ® 12.02 hrs, Volume- 5,038 of, Depth- 1.38" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Spens 5.00.38.00 his. din 0.05 hm Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall -2.75" 23,431 74 >75%Gress cover, Good, HSG C 3.350 98 Water Surface, HSG C 43,772 85 Weighted Average 23,431 53.53% Pervious Area 24341 48.47% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Desciption (min) (feet) (tuft) (f/sec) itis) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116/2013 HvdroCAD910.00 ern 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Soewere Solutions LLC Peas 21 Summary for Subcatchment 205: S. Rear Yard Flow Runoff = 3.85 ale a 12.02 hu, Volume= 9,397 cf, Depth- 0.95" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method. UH=SCS. Time Span= 5.00-36.00 hre, dim 0.05 me Type II 24 -hr 2 -Veer Event Reinfell=2.75" 118,148 78 Weighted Average 88,937 83.74% Pervious Area 19,211 15.26% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) 01/111 (ft/sec) (ch) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1/24-hr2-Year Event Reinfell=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/15/2013 HvdroCA0010 00 sM 00560 02011 HvtlroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 22 Summary for Subcatchment 305: SE Rear Yards Runoff • 2.47 cfa (M 12.02 hrs, Volume- 5,031 cf, Depth- 0.95" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-35.00 furs, dl• 0.05 ms Type It 24 -hr 2 -Veer Event Rainfall -2.75" Area far) CN Description 11,413 98 Paved parking, HSG C 84,417 84,95% Pervious Area 11,413 15.05% Impervious Ares To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Desulption (min) (feet) (M) (Nsec) (of$) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112288 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Ralnfall=2.75" Prepared 11y Microsoft Pnnted 5/182013 HydmCA0010.00 am 00590 02011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pepe 23 Summary for Subcatchment 40S: Connection Flow Runoff 10.44 ma a 12.03 hre, Volume- 25,835 of, Depth- 0,85" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-38.00 his. dt= 0.05 his Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall -2.75" 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 384,495 78 Weighted Average 318,145 87.28% Pervious Area 48,350 12.72% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (flM1 (ft/sec) (cfel 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 H droCAD010.0D srn W590 02011 H droCAD Sorowam Solutions LLC Pame 24 Summary for Subcatchment SOS: NE Rear Yards Runoff = 1.95 cis ® 12.02 hre, Volume= 4,731 M, Depth- 1.01" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span= 5.00-38.00 Inns, dt- 0.05 hm Type It 24 -hr 2 -Veer Event Rainfall=2.75" Area (efl CN Description 12,443 98 Paved parking. HSG C 43,817 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 58,280 79 Weighted Average 43,817 77.88% Pervious Area 12,443 22.12% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Descnp8on (min) (feet) (MI) (fuaec) (de) 10.0 Direct Entry, M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M i M M 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type It 24 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfell=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HydroCAD®m.WOn 00.590 O 2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Peoe 25 Summary for Reach 1R: SW Flow off Site Inflow Area 260,820 sf, 40,73% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 1.27' for 2 -Year Event event Inflow = 1.73a ® 12.41 hrs, Volume= 27,510 cf Outflow 1.73 cfe 0 12.41 hie, Volume= 27,510 of, Aften= 0%, Lae- 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Intl*Trans method, Time Span= 5.0036.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hre 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type l/ 24 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall=2.75' Prepared by Microsoft Primed 5/15/2013 HydnoCAD8 1000 5/nO31590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Summary for Reach 2R: S. Flow off Site I nflow Area 512,543 sf, 36.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 1.21" for 2 -Year Event event Inflow 5.96 cfsQ 12.05 he, Volume= 51,674d Outflow = 5.96 cis ® 12.05 his, Volume- 51,574 cf, Ai 0%, Lag- 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hre 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5118r1013 HVdroCADG 10.00 stn 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Sollwers Solutions LLC Peas 27 Summary for Reach 3R: SE Flow off Site Inflow Area - 119,802 sf, 20.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.11" for 2 -Year Event event Inflow = 3.43 cisQ 12.04 Ins, Volume= 11,085 of Oumow 3.43 cfs Q 12.04 hm, Volume= 11.085 cf, Aden= 0%, Leg= 0.0 min Routing by Slor-Ind*Trane method, Time Span= 5.00.38.00 tire, dl= 0.05 hrs 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Ralnfili 75' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5118/2013 HvdroCADO 10.00 stn 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 28 Summary for Reach 4R: Ex. Pond Inflow Area 304,495 if, 12.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth= O.00" for 2 -Year Event event Inflow 0.00 cis @ 5.00 hrs, Volume- 0 of Outflow = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hre, Volume= 0 of, Alten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Star -Ind -Trans method, Time Span- 5.00-38.00 hra, dt= 0.05 him 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Reinfall=2.75" 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall=2.75' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/1612013 HvdroCADO 10.00 em 00590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Paas 29 HvdmCADO 1900 s/n 00.590 02011 HydroCAD Soroaere Solutions LLC Page 30 Summary for Reach 5R: NE Flow off Site Inflow Area 56,260 af, 22.12% Impervious, Infimv Depth= 1.01" for 2 -Year Event event Inflow 1.95 cis Q 12.02 his, Volume- 4,731 f Outflow = 1.95 cis C 12.02 hm, Volume- 4,731 of, Allen= 0%, Log- 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind-Trans method, Time Span= 5.0038.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 his Summary for Pond IP: Pond #1 Inflow Area = 260,820 sf, 40.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.31" for 2 -Veer Event event Inflow = 11.91 cis Q 12.02 hre, Volume= 28,543 G Outfimv = 1.73 cis 0 12.41 hre, Volume= 27,510 aL Aden- 85%, Lag- 23.4 min Primary = 1.73 cis ® 12.41 hre, Volume= 27,510 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span- 5.00-38.00 has. dt= 0.05 hrs Sterling Eley 888.50 Swf.Area= 14,054 at Storage- 48,865 cf Peek Elev= 889.37' (M 12.41 hre Surf Area= 15,293 sf Storege= 61,&34 cf (12,789 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: initial storage ezcedes outflow) Center -of -Mese det. time- 105.5 min ( 1.002.7 - 837.2 ) Volume Invert Avail Slorage Storage Description 01 882.00' 107,146 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Usted below (Recoo) Elevation SurfArea Inc.Slore Cum.Slore (feet) (sq -ft) (cubiafeet) (cublc4oet) 862.00 4,107 0 0 884.00 5,838 9,945 9,845 888.00 7,969 13,807 23,752 867.50 9,719 13,288 37,018 868.00 11,808 5,382 42,400 868.50 14,054 6,488 48,885 869.50 15,478 14,788 63,631 870.00 18,211 7,922 71,554 871.00 17,719 16,965 88,519 872.00 19,535 18,827 107,146 Device Routine Invert Outlet Devices e1 Primary 888.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L=22.0 Ke=0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 866.50'1868.39' S• 0.0050'/ Cc= -0.900 n• 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends 8 connections, Flow Area= 0.79 of PrimaryOutFI" Mati=1.73 cis ® 12.41 hre HVV=869.37' (Free Discharge) 1 -Culvert (Bartel Controls 1.73 cls ® 3.19 fps) 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall=2.75" Prepared by Microsoft Pnnted 5/1612013 HydroCADO 10.00 sin (MW 02011 HvdroCAD SoftwareSdutions LLC Pace 31 Summary for Pond 2P: Pond #2 Inflow Area = 394,495 of. 42.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth • 1.31" for 2 -Veer Event event Inflow = 18.02 cis 0 12.02 his, Volume= 43,171 of Durso. = 3.45 cis 0 12.30 hre, Volume= 42,277 d, Afton- 81%, Lag- 17.2 min Primary 3.45 do 0 12.30 his, Volume- 42,277 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span- 5.00-38.00 hre, dt= 0.05 his Starting Elev= 680.50' Sud.Area- 17,807 of Storage- 68,953 of Peak Elev= 081.48' 0 12.30 hre Surt.Aree= 19,303 sf Storage -87,056d (18,103 d above start) Flood Elev= 848.50' SurWaa= 0 of Storege= 0 d Plug -Flow detention time- (not calculated: Initial storage exceees outflow) Center -of -Mase eel. time= 136.6 min ( 973.8. 837.2 ) Volume Invert Avell.Storage Storage Description #1 874.00' 152,745 or Custom Stage Data (Prlomatic)Llsted below (Recalc) Elevation Surt.Ansa Inc.Stare Cum.Store (feet) (ag-ft) (cublWeet) (cubMeen 874.00 6,842 0 0 875.00 8,938 15,780 15,780 878.00 11,261 20,199 35,979 800.00 13,809 25,070 61,049 880.50 17,807 7,904 68,953 882.00 20,107 28.438 87,389 883.50 22,534 31,981 129,369 884.00 23,372 11,477 140,848 884.50 24,224 11,899 152,745 Device Routine Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 880.50' 15.0" Round Culvert L=270.0' Ke- 0.500 Inlet / Ouflet Invert- 880.50' 1745.50' S= 0.50007 Cc- 0.900 n- 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends 5 connections, Flow Area- 1.23 of Primary OwFlow Max -3.45 do 0 12.30 him HW=881.48' (Free Discharge) 1•Culven (Inlet Controls 3.45 ds 0 3.36 fps) 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Event Rainfall -2.75' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5110/2013 HydroCADO 10.00 eln 00590 02011 HvdmCAD Software Sduliom LLC Pace 32 Summary for Pond 3P: Pond #3 Inflow Area = 43,772 d, 46.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth • 1.38" for 2 -Veer Event event Inflow = 2.10 de 0 12.02 hre, Volume= 5,038 of Outflow 1.21 ds 0 12.13 hre, Volume- 5,034 of, Afton- 43%, Lag- 6.8 min Primary 1.21 cis 0 12.13 hrs, Volume= 5,034 or Routing by Stor-Intl method, Time Span- 5.DD-35.00 his, dim 0.05 hie Sterling Elev= 570.50' Sud.Area• 2,150 of Storage- 1,381 or Peek Elev- 871.07'a 12.13 his Sutf.Area= 2,489 sf Storage -2,715d (1,334 dabove start) Plug -Flow detention time= 209,7 min calculated for 3,347 of (72% of Inflow) Center -of -Masa det. time- 49.5 min ( 883.0 - 833.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storeae Storage Description #1 838.00' 8,633 of Custom Stage Data (Prlsmatic)Listed below (Recalc) ElevationSurt.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (ea -m (cublo-feet) (mbMeeO 868.00 189 0 0 869.50 542 808 608 870.00150 198 806 870.50 2,150 575 1,381 872.00 3,034 3,888 5,269 873.00 3,693 3,364 8,633 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 870.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L• 18.0 Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Ouget Invert- 870.50r/ 870.00' S= 0.0278'f Cc= 0.900 n• 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends a connections, Flow Area= 0.79 of Prlmery OutFlow Max•1.19 de a 12.13 him HW -871.07' (Free Discharge) tI-Culvert (Inlet Canuds 1.19 ds 0 2.57 fps) 112299 Jourissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124-hr 2-Year Event Reinfe11=2.75' Prepared by Microsoft Panted 6115/2013 HydmCAD010.00 am 00590 02011 HydrDCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 33 Summary for Pond 4P: Ex. Pond #4 Inflow Area = 364,495 at. 12.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.85" for 2-Year Event event Inflow • 10.44 do ® 12.03 hra, Volume- 25.835 cf Oumow 0.00 ds ® 5.00 hre, Volume= 0 of, Afton- 100%, Leg= 0.0 min Primary = 0.00 pis ® 5A0 hrs, Volume- 0 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 hra, dt= 0.05 him Peek Elev= 870.76'(M 24.80 hre Surf.Area- 35,427 of Storage= 25,833 cr Plug-Flow detention time- (not calculated: Initial storage excedes oumow) Center-of-Mass tial. time, (not calculated: no oudlow) Volume Invert Avaii.Storsae Storage Description #1 870.00' 261.506 of Custom Stage Data (PrismatiCtUsted below (Recalc) Elevation SurfArea Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sc-m (cubiofeet) (cubic fee0 870.00 32,835 0 0 872.00 39,885 72,520 72.520 874.00 47,071 88,756 159,276 878.00 55,259 102.330 261,506 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 874.50' 26.0' long x 15.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.50 Coal. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.54 2.54 2.63 Primary OutFlow Mex=0.00 cis ® 5.00 him HVJ=870.00' (Free Discharge) t-1 =Broad-Crested Rectangular Walr( Controls 0.00 cls) 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Event Rein/e11=3.55' Prepared by Microsoft Panted 5116/2013 HydmCADO 1000 sm 00590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 34 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Flow Into Pond 1 Runoff = 17.90 eta ® 12.01 his, Volume- 43,021 of, Depth- 1.98" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 hre, tit= 0.05 him Type II 24 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall -3.55" 74 >75% Gress cover. Good, HSG C 70 Woods, Good, MSO C 260,820 84 Weighted Average 154,594 59.27% Perilous Area 106,225 40.73% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description ( 1) (feel) (ftm) Msec) (del 10.0 Direct Entry, M M M M M M M M M w M M M M M M M M M 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr &Year Event Rainfal1=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdmCAM 10.00 aln 00590 02011 HvdmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 35 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Flow Into Pond 2 Runoff 27.08 cls ® 12.01 hre, Volume- 65,070 d, Depth= 1.98" 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall=3.55' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/182013 HVdmCAD010.00 afn 00590 02011 HvdmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 36 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Flow Into Pond 3 Runoff = 3.12 cis ® 12.01 hm. Volume- 7,514d, Depth- 2.09' Runoff by SCS TW20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.0038.00 hre, dt- 0.05 hre Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span= 5.00.38.00 hrs. dr- 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall -3.55" Type II 24 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall -3.55' 394,495 84 Weighted Average 228,559 57.94%Pervious Area 165,939 42.08% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feel) (fth) five.) (ds) 10.0 Direct Entry, 74 HSG C 23,431 53.53% Pervious Area 20,341 46.47% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Cepadty Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) WSW) (cfe) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/15/2013 HvdroCAD010.00s/n0059002011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 37 Summary for Subcatchment 20S: S. Rear Yard Flow Runoff 5.30 ds® 12.02 hre, Volume- 15,118cf, Depth- 1.54" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00.38.00 hrs, it" 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall -3.55" Area (et) CN Description 19,211 68 Paved parking, HSG C 98,937 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 118,148 78 Weighted Average 98,937 83.74% pervious Area 19,211 15.26% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ffm) (f/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124-hr5-Year Event Rain1811=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Pdntetl WORM HvdmCAD01900 sfn0059002011 HvdmCADSoffwsre Sdu(ions LLC Page 38 Summary for Subcatchment 30S: SE Rear Yards Runoff • 4.04 cis a 12.02 hrs, Volume= 9,703 cf, Depth- 1.54" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span= 5.00-38.00 hre, dt- 0.05 hrs Type 11 244hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall=3.55" 75,830 78 Weighted Average 64,417 84.95% pervious Area 11,413 15.05% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) 01/10 (Nees) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116/2013 M droCAD010. 00 a/n W590 0 2011 H dmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pads 39 Summary for Subcatchment 40S: Connection Flow Runoff - 17.84 cis ® 12.02 hrs, Volume- 42,576 cf, Depth- 1.40" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span= 5.00-36.00 hrs. dt- 0.05 him Type II 24 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall=3.55" Area (a0 CN Description 46,350 98 Paved perking, HSG C 190,826 74 >7594 Grass cover, Good, HSG C 127.319 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 364,495 76 Weighted Average 316,145 87.28% Pervious Area 48,350 12.72% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (Msec) (et$) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Event Re/nfa11=3.55' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 HvdroCADO 10.00 am 0059002011 HvdmCAD So are Solutions LLC Pace 40 Summary for Subcatchment SOS: NE Rear Yards Runoff = 3.14 cis (jQ 12.02 me, Volume= 7,524 cf, Depth- 1.60" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 his. dt= 0.05 him Type II 24 -hr S -Year Event Relnfalt•3.55' 56,260 79 Weighted Average 43,817 77.88% Pervious Area 12,443 2212% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (Na) (f /sec) (CU) 10.0 Direct Envy, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type lI 24 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall=3.55' Prepared by Microsoft Printed &18@013 HydroCAD®10.00 em 00590 02011 HydroCAD Software Solution LLC Pace 41 Summary for Reach 1 R: SW Flow off Site Inflow Area • 260,820 sf, 40.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.93" for 5 -Year Event event Inflow • 2.86 ds Q 12.35 me, Volume= 41,927 of Outflow • 2.86 cfs (M 12.35 hra, Volume- 41,927 d, Aden= 0%, Leg= 0.0 min 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Event Raimaff=3.55' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 Hyd CAD01000 s/n0059002011 HydroCADSohware SolutionsLLC Pace 42 Summary for Reach 2R: S. Flow off Site Inflow Area = 512,643 sf, 36.12% Impervious. Inflow Depth > 1.85' for 5 -Veer Event event Inflow = 10.35 de ® 12.05 ma, Volume= 79,233 d OuMow = 1035 cis ® 12.05 ma, Volume= 79,233 of. Atteno 0%, Leg• 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Spen• 5.00-36.00 hire, dl• 0.05 hra Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span- 5.00-38.00 hra, dt= 0.05 h. 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Event Ralnfall=3.55" 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr SYear Event Reinfell=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/1612013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HydroCADS 10.00 sin 00.590 02011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 43 HydmCAD®10.00 sin 00590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 44 Summery for Reach 3R: SE Flow off Site Summary for Reach 411: Ex. Pond Inflow Area • 119,602 at, 26.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth - 1.73" for 5 -Year Event event Inflow Area - 364,495 sf, 12.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth • 0.00" for 5 -Year Event event Inflow 5.88 cis Q 12.04 him, Volume= 17,215 of Inflow 0.00 cis Q 5.00 his, Volume- 0 cf Outflow = 5.88 cis Q 12.04 him, Volume- 17,215 Q. Allen= 0%, Leg- 0.0 min Oumow 0.00 cis a 5.00 him, Volume- 0 cf, Allen- 0%, Leg= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trane method, Time Span- 5.00-35.00 Inns, dt= 0.05 Inn Routing by Stor-Intl+Trane method, Time Span- 5.00.35.00 hrs, dt• 0.05 him Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description #1 862.00' 107,148 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surt.Ama Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) fsg-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 862.0 4,107 0 0 884.00 5,838 9,945 9,945 866.00 7,969 13,807 23,752 867.50 9,719 13,288 37,018 868.00 11,808 5.382 42,400 868.50 14,054 6,466 48,865 869.50 15,478 14,766 63,631 870.00 16,211 7,922 71,554 871.00 17,719 16,965 88,519 872.00 19.535 18,627 107,146 Device Routing Invert Oudel Devices #1 Primary 868.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet /Outlet Invert- 868.50'/868.39' S= 0.0050'f Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends 8 connections, Flow Area= 0.79 of Primary OutFlow Mex=2.85 cis 0 12.35 bra HV4=869.81' (Free Discharge) 1 -Culvert (Be"[ Controls 2.85 cis (M 3.65 fps) 112289 Jeurlseen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall=3.55" 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type /124 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfa11=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 HvdroCADO 10.00 Mn 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 45 HydmCAD®10.00 sin 00590 0 2011 HvdnoCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 46 Summary for Reach 5R: NE Flow off Site Summary for Pond IP: Pond #1 Inflow Area • 56,260 of. 22.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth - 1.60- for 5 -Year Event event Inflow Area = 260,820 of, 40.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.98" for &Year Event event Inflow 3.14dsa 12.02hrs, Volume- 7,524 of Inflow = 17.90 cis® 12.01 hre, Volume• 43,021 of Outflow • 3.14 de ® 12.02 hra, Volume- 7,524 cf, Aaen• 0%. Lag= 0.0 min Outflow = 2.86 cis ® 12.35 hre, Volume- 41,927 d, Atlen= 84%. Lag- 20.2 min Primary = 2.86 da C 12.35 hre, Volume= 41,927 d Routing by Stor-Ind-Trans method, Time Span- 5.00.36.00 hre, dt- 0.05 hra Routing by Time Span= hre. hra v= 8Intl 0' Sur, at Storage- 8,80. of Starting Elev= 868.50' ae= 14,054 of Storage= 48.885 d Peak Elev= 869.81'@ 12.35 hre Surf Area, 15,828 a/ Storage= 88,429 d (18.564 d above alert) 2.35 h Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: Initial storage excedes oufflow) Center-of-Mese det. time= 144.7 min ( 970.2 - 825.5 ) Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description #1 862.00' 107,148 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surt.Ama Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) fsg-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 862.0 4,107 0 0 884.00 5,838 9,945 9,945 866.00 7,969 13,807 23,752 867.50 9,719 13,288 37,018 868.00 11,808 5.382 42,400 868.50 14,054 6,466 48,865 869.50 15,478 14,766 63,631 870.00 16,211 7,922 71,554 871.00 17,719 16,965 88,519 872.00 19.535 18,627 107,146 Device Routing Invert Oudel Devices #1 Primary 868.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet /Outlet Invert- 868.50'/868.39' S= 0.0050'f Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends 8 connections, Flow Area= 0.79 of Primary OutFlow Mex=2.85 cis 0 12.35 bra HV4=869.81' (Free Discharge) 1 -Culvert (Be"[ Controls 2.85 cis (M 3.65 fps) 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfal1=3.55" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511612013 HvdroCA001000 sm 66590 02011 HvdmCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 47 Summary for Pond 2P: Pond #2 Inflow Area • 394,495 sf, 42.06% Impervious, In0ow Depth = 1.98" for 5 -Veer Event event Inflow • 27.05 cis Q 12.01 hra, Volume- 55,070 of OuMow : 5.42 cls 12.28 lire, Volume- 84,116 d, Aden- 80%, Lag- 15.9 min Primary 5.42 cls 12.28 lire, Volume- 64,1184 Routing by Stor-Intl method, Time Spen= 5.00.35.00 lire, dr- 0.05 hrs Starting Elev- 880.50' Sud.Area= 17,807 at Storage- 68,953 d Peak Elev= 881.97' Q 12.28 hra Sud.Area• 20,057 or Storage- 99,730 of (27,777 of above start) Flood Elev- 848.50' Surf.Aree= 0 at Storage= 0 of Plug -Flow detention time- (not calculated: Initial storage excedes ou8low) Center -of -Mass dot. time= 118.6 min ( 944.0 - 825.5 ) Volume Invert Avail. Storage Storage Description #1 874.00' 152,745 of Custom Stage Data (Prismallc).isled below (Recalc) Elevation Sud.Area Ina Store Cum.Slore (feet) log -N (wblo-feell (cubic -feet) 874.00 6,842 0 0 876.00 8,938 15,780 15,780 878.00 11,261 20,199 35,979 880.00 13,809 25,070 81,049 880.50 17,807 7,904 68,953 882.00 20,107 28,436 97,389 883.50 22,534 31,801 129,369 884.00 23,372 11.477 140,846 884.50 24,224 11,899 152,745 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices ai Primary 880.50 15.0" Round Culvert L=270.0' Ke=0.500 Inlet /Outlet Invert• 880.50 / 745.50' S• 0.5000 T Ctm0.900 n-0.013 Concrete pipe, bentla 8 connections, Flow Area• 1.23 sf LmaryOutFlow Mex=5.42 cis Q 12.28 hrs HVve881.97' (Free Discharge) 1 -Culvert (Inlet Controls 5.42 cis Q 4.42 fps) M 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 5 -Year Event Rainfal1=3.55° Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdmCADO 10.00 sh100590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 48 Summary for Pond 3P: Pond #3 Inflow Area • 43,772 at, 48.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.06" for &Year Event event Inflow = 3.12 cis 12.01 lire, Volume- 7,514 of Outftow = 1.95 cis ® 12.12 hra, Volume- 7,512 d, After= 37%, Leg= 6.1 min Primary 1.95 de Q 12.12 hra, Volume- 7,512 of Routing by Star -Ind method, Time Span= 5.0005.00 lire, dt• 0.05 hra Starting Ekw= 870.50' Sud.Area- 2,150 of Storage- 1,381 of Peek Elev- 871.27' Q 12.12 hra Surf.Area= 2,606 at Storage- 3,220 d (1,339 of above sten) Plug -Flow detention time- 155.7 min calculated for 6,131 of (82% of Inflow) Center -of -Mesa det. time- 41.8 min ( 864.0 - 822.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Slorege Storage Description #1 868.00' 8,633 of Custom Stage Data (Prismadc"sted balm (Recalc) Elevation Sud.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (ag-m (wblofeel) (cubiafee0 868.00 169 0 0 869.50 642 808 808 870.00 150 198 808 870.50 2,150 575 1,381 872.00 3,034 3,888 5,269 873.00 3,893 3,364 8,633 Device Routlno Invert Outiel Devices e1 Primary 870.50 12.0" Round Culvert L-18.01 Ke - 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert- 870.50/870.00' S•0.0278'r Cc=0.900 n- 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends 8 connections, Flow Area- 0.79 of Primary OutFlow Max -1.93 cis Q 12.12 hra HVv871.27' (Free Discharge) I -Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.93 cis Q 2.98 fps) 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type/124-hr 5 -Year Event Rainfall=3.55" 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type/124-hr 10-Yeer Event Ramfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/1812013 HydroCADO 10,00 em 00560 02011 HrdmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pao@ 49 H dfoCADO 10.00 em 00590 02011 Hv4roCAD Software Solutions LLC Peas 50 Summary for Pond 4P: Ex. Pond #4 Inflow Area • 364,405 at, 12.72% Impervious. Inflow Depth = 1.40" for 5 -Veer Event event Inflow • 17.64 crit 12.02 Ire, Volume= 42,576 cf Outflow • 0.00 ds 5.00 hm, Volume= 0 cf. ABen- 100%, Leg= 0.0 min Primary 0,00ch® 5.00hre, Volume= 0 c Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Spen• 5.00.36.00 hire, dt- 0.05Ins Peek Elev- 871.22'0 24.60 hre Sud.Area- 37,010 sf Storage= 42,575 cf Plug -Flow detention time- (not calculated: Initial storage excedes ouffiaw) Center -of -Mass det. time- (not calculated: no oumow) Volume Invert Avail.Sloraae Storage Description 01 870.00' 261,606 cf Custom Stage Data (Prlsmagc)Usted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (M -ft) (cubic feel) (cubic -feet) 870.00 32,835 0 0 872.00 38,685 72,520 72,520 874.00 47,071 86,758 159,276 876.00 55,259 102,330 261.606 I, 16.0' oreaem 9foad-Gresua Rectangular WI 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Ish) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Primary OutFlow Mex•D.00 cis ® 5.00 hrs HW -870.00' (Free Discharge) 1•Broad-Crested Rntanguisr Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Subcatchment IS: Flow Into Pond 1 Runoff • 22.91 cis a 12.01 hre, Volume- 55,384 cf, Depth- 2.55" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 hm, el= 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 10 -Veer Event Relnfell=4.20" Area (30 CN Description 95.273 98 Paved parking. HSG C 140,233 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 14,361 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 59,27% Pervious Area 40.73% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (mi.) (feat) (IVO) (ft/sec) (de) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type /124 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HydroCADO 10.00 sin 0059002011 HvdmCAD Sdiware Sdubons LLC Pape 51 Summary for Subcetchment 25: Flow Into Pond 2 Runoff • 34.65 ds ® 12.01 hre, Volume= 83,789 d, Depth- 2.55" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-38.00 hre, dt• 0.05 hra Type It 24 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfall=4.20" Area (so CN Description 150,767 98 Water Surface. HSG C 198,880 74 >75% Gress cover, Good, HSG C 29,899 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 15.169 98 Water Surface, HSG C 394,495 84 Weighted Average 228,559 57.94% Pervious Area 165,936 42.06% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (8/a1 (f/sec) (de) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfall= -4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5118/2013 HvdroCADO 10.00 sin 0059002011 HYdmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pao. 52 Summery for Subcetchment 3S: Flow Into Pond 3 Runoff 3.97 ds ® 12.01 hrs, Volume- 9,620 of, Depth- 2.64" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-38.00 hrs, dt• 0.05 hre Type It 24 -hr I0 -Year Event Rainfall -41U' HSG C 23,431 53.53% Pervious Area 20,341 46.47% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Desorption (min) (feet) (f m) (a/ea) (ds) 10.0 Direct Entry, = = M = = = = = = = a = = = = = = = = 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Primed 5/1612013 HvdruCAD01000 sm 00590 02011 HvdroCAD SoftereSolutions LLC Pace 53 Summary for Subcatchment 20S: S. Rear Yard Flow Runoff 8.42 do ® 12.02 his. Volume= 20,159 d, Depth- 2.05" Rums by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00.38.00 hre, dt• 0.05 him Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfall=4.20" Area (90 CN Description 19,211 98 Paved parking. HSG C 98,937 74 75% Gress cover, Good HSGC 118,148 78 Weighted Average 98,937 93.74% Pervious Area 19,211 16.26% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (am) (Naec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Event Relnfa/h4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511612013 HVdroCADe 10.00 Un 00590 02011 HydreCAD Sdtware Solutions LLC _. Pane 54 Summery for Subcatchment 30S: SE Rear Yards Runoff 5.40 da ® 12.02 hre, Volume= 12,939d, Depth= 2.05" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Tina Span- 5.00-36.00 his, dt• 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 10 -Veer Event Rainfall -4.20' 75,830 78 Weighted Average 64,417 84,95% pervious Area 11,413 15.05% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (NR) (ft/sec) (ds) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Event Ralnfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdroCAM 10.00 stn 0058002011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 55 Summery for Subcatchment 40S: Connection Flow Runoff = 23.98 efs ® 12.02 hre, Volume= 57,502 cf, Depth- 1.89" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span= 5.00-38.00 hrs, dt- 0.05 ms Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfall -4.20" Area (a0 CN Description 46,350 98 Paved perking. HSG C 190,826 74 >75% Gress cover, Good, HSG C 127.319 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 364,495 78 Weighted Average 318,145 87.28% Pervious Area 46,350 12.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fIM) (fusec) (ch) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 14Ye9r Event Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Pdnted 5116/2013 HvdroCAD010.00 sin 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 56 Summery for Subcatchment 50S: NE Rear Yards Runoff 4.18 cts ® 12.02 hrs, Volume- 9,972 cf. Depth- 2.13" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span- 5.00.38.00 hre, db 0.05 has Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfall -4.20" 56,260 79 Weighted Average 43,817 77.88% Pervious Area 12,443 22.12% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (UN ItUsec) We) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1/24 -hr 1O -Year Event Relnfalk4.20' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdroCADS 10.00 am 00580 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 57 Summary for Reach IR: SW Flow off Site Inflow Area • 26,820 of, 40.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.50" for 10 -Year Event event Inflow 3.78 ds ® 12.33 hm, Volume= 54,255 d Outflow 3.76 cis ® 12.33 his, Volume= 54,255 of, Aften= 0%, Lag- 0.0 min Routing by Slor-Ind-Trans method, Time Span= 5.00.38.00 hm, dt• 0.05 hre 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type II24-hr 10 -Year Event Rainratl=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 Hytl CADS 1000 amO0590 02011 HytlmCAD Soltwere Sdurona LLC Paae 56 Summary for Reach 2R: S. Flow off Site Inflow Area 512.643 81. 36.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 2.41" for 10 -Year Event event Inflow 13.57 cis ® 12.04 hot, Volume= 102,935 d Outflow 13.57 ds ® 12.04 hm. Volume= 102,935 d, Allen- 0%, Lep• 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind•Trans method, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 firs. dt= 0.05 hre 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HydroCAM 10.00 sin 00590 02011 HvdmCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 59 Summary for Reach 3R: SE Flow off She Inflow Area = 119,602 at, 25.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.26" for 10 -Year Event event Inflow = 7.52 chs ® 12.03 hre, Volume= 22,557 cf Outflow = 7.52 ch® 12.03 his. Volume- 22,557 cf, Atten-0%, Lag- 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind*Trans method, Time Spen= 5.00.35.00 hre, dt=0.05 hre 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfall=4.20' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511012013 H dmCAOS 10.00 fin OOSW 02011 H dmCAD Software Sdutlons LLC Peas 60 Summary for Reach 4R: Ex. Pond Inflow Area= 364,495 at, 12.72%Impervous, Inflow Depth= 0.00' for 10 -Year Event event Inflow = 0.00cff® 5.00hre, Volume= 0 C Outflow • 0.00 cfa ® 5.00 hre, Volume= 0 cf. Atter- 0%, Leg= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind*Trane method, Time Span- 5.00-35.00 hrs, dl= 0.05 his 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfall -4.20' 112289 Jaurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Event Rainfal1=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/1 612 01 3 HudroCA001000 stn 00590 02011 HudmCAD Software SdutWs LLC Pace 61 H droCAM 10.01) sin 00590 C 2011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 62 Summary for Reach SR: NE Flow off Site Summary for Pond 1P: Pond #1 Inflow Area • 58,260 e( 22.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth - 2.13" for 10 -Year Event event Inflow Area = 260,820 e( 4073% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.55" for 10 -Year Event event Inflow = 4.16 cis ® 12.02 hre, Volume- 9,972 at Inflow = 22.91 cis Q 12.01 hre, Volume- 55,384 ci Outflow 4.16 cis (M 12.02 his. Volume- 9,972 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Outflow = 3.76 cis ® 12.33 hre, Volume= 54,255 cf, Aden= 84%, Leg= 19.1 min Primary 3.76 cis a 12.33 hrs, Volume- 54,255 cf Routing by Slor-Ind+Trane method, Time Span- 5.00.38.00 his, dt- 0.05 hre Routing byre-0Intl0' Sur,Time 14,055sf St.00hre,8.8OA5 turn, Starting Elev= 888.50' S.331m; = urf.Ar sf Storage= 48,885 of Peak Elev= 870.17'C 12.33 hre Surt.Arae• 10,488 of Storage -74.337d (25,472 M above alert) Plug -Flow detention time- 920.7 min calculated for 5,390 at (10% of In0ow) Center -of -Mese dot. time- 137.0 min ( 955.2 - 818.3 ) Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description #1 882.00' 107,146 ci Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recslc) Elevation Surf Area Inc.Slore Cum.Blore (feet) (sq -(e (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 882.00 4,107 0 0 864.00 5,838 9,945 9,945 888.00 7,959 13,807 23,752 887.50 9,719 13,288 37,018 858.00 11,808 5,382 42.400 888.50 14,054 5,488 48,865 888.50 15,478 14,788 63,531 870.00 16,211 7,922 71,554 871.00 17,719 15,965 88,519 872.00 19.535 18,627 107,146 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices 01 Primary 868.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L-22.9 K;,0,500 Inlet I Outlet Invert- 888.50'1068,39' S-0.00507 Cc= 0.900 n• 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends s connections. Flow Area= 0.79 at LmaryOutFI" Mea=3.78 cfs ® 12.33 hre HW -870.17' (Free Discharge) 1•Culvert (Barrel Controls 3.76 cid a 4.79 fps) Elevation Surt.Area 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type1124-hr 10 -Year Event Reinlall=4.20" 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology 7ypell24-hr 10 -Year Event Rainlel1=4,20- Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116/2013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116/2013 HydroCADO 10. W SM00590 02011 HYdmCAD Software Sdutbns LLC Pees 63 HvdmCADO 10.00 sin 00590 02011 HYdMGAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 64 Summary for Pond 2P: Pond #2 Summary for Pond 3P: Pond #3 Inflow Area 394,495 at, 42.06% Impervious, Inflow Depth• 2.55" for 10- Year Event event Inflow Area= 43,772 of, 46,47% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.64" for 10 -Year Event event Inflow = 34.85 do Q 12.01 Into, Volume- 83,789 d Inflow = 3.97 ds a 12.01 hre, Volume- 9,820 cf Outflow 6.64 cis a 12.29 hre, Volume= 82.775 d, Aften= 81%, Lep= 16.5 min Outflow 2.49 de ® 12.11 hto, Volume- 9,618 cf, Atlen• 37%, Lag- 6.1 min Primary 8.84 ds � 12.29 hre, Volume- 82.775 d Primary • 2.49 de ® 12.11 hrs, Volume- 9,818 d Routing by Slor-Intl method, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 Into, dt• 0.05 hre Routing by Star -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-38.00 his, dl= 0.05 him Starting Elev- 880.50' Sutf.Area• 17,807 of Storage= 68,953 at Sterling Elev= 870.50' Sud.Area= 2,150 of Storage= 1,381 d Peak Elev 882.39' a 12.29 hre Surt.Atea• 20,733 of Storage= 105,292 d (36,339 cf above sten) Peek Elav- 871.43'a 12.11 hre Surt.Ame- 2,897 at Storage= 3,631 at (2,250 of above sten) Flood Elev 848.50' Surf.Aree• 0 of Storage- 0 d 17,807 7.904 Plug -Flow detention time= 131.2 min calculated for 8,223 d (85% of Inflow) Plug -Flow detention time- 733.6 min calculated for 13,822 d (17% of Inflow) Canter -of -Mesa dot. time- 38.0 min ( 853.1 - 815.1 ) Canter -of -Mass del. Ume• 112.4 min ( 930.7 - 818.3) 97,389 883.50 Volume Invert Avall.Slorege Storage Description Volume Invert Avall.Slortas Storeca Descdcllon #1 868.00' 8,633cf Custom Stage Data (Prisma0c)Llsted babes (Rewlc) #1 874.00' 152,746cf Custom Stags Deal (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) 23,372 Elevation Surt.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -a) (cublofee0 (cubicfeet) 874.00 6,842 0 0 876.00 8,938 15,780 15,780 878.00 11,261 20,199 35,979 880.00 13,809 25,070 61,049 880.50 17,807 7.904 68,953 882.00 20,107 28,436 97,389 883.50 22,534 31,981 129,369 884.00 23,372 11,477 140,846 884.50 24,224 11,899 152,745 Device Reuling Invert Outlet Devices 61 Primary 880.50' 18.0" Round Culvert L-270.0' Ke - 0.500 nlel / Outiel Invert= 880.50' 1745.50' S- 0.5000 7 Cc= 0.900 n-0.013 Concrete pipe, bends a connections, Flow Area= 1.23 sf Primary OutFlow Max -6.64 de Q 12.29 too HW -882.39' (Free Discharge) 1 -Culvert (Inlet Controls 6.84 do ® 5.41 fps) Elevation Surt.Area Inc.Store Cam.Store (feel) (sq -ft) (cubic -feel) (cubMee0 888.00 169 0 0 869.50 642 608 508 870.00 150 198 BOB 870.50 2,150 575 1,381 872.00 3,034 3,888 5,269 873.00 3,893 3,384 8,533 Device Routing Invert Ouget Devices #1 Primary 870.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L-180 Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 870.50' / 870.00' S- 0.0278't Cc= 0.900 n- 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends 8 connections, Flow Area- 0.79 of tmary OutFlow Max=2.47 ds ® 12.11 his HW=871.42' (Free Discharge) I -Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.47 da C 3.27 fps) 112289 Jeurblsen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Event Reinre/h4.2O" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/1612013 HvdroCADe 10.00 s/n 00590 02011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 65 Summary for Pond 4P: Ex. Pond 94 Inflow Area = 364,495 sf, 12.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth - 1.89" for 10.Year Event event Inflow 23.98 cis Q 12.02 hrs, Volume= 57,502 of Outflow = 0.00 cfs Q 5.00 him, Volume- 0 of, Aden= 100%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.00 cis Q 5.00 hre, Volume- 0 d Routing by Stw-Ind method, Time Span- 5.0038.00 him, d1= 0.05 him Peak Elev= 871.62' ® 24.60 him Surf.Area= 38,367 at Storage= 57,502 of Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated; Initial storage exce les ou8low) Center -of -Masa det. time- (not calculated: no outflow) Volume Invert Avall Storage Storage Description e1 870.00' 261,606 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Llsted below (Reraic) Elevation Sur/.Area Ina Store Cgm.Store (feet) tag -m (cublo-fee0 (wblo-feen 870.00 32,835 0 0 872.00 39,685 72,520 72,520 874.00 47,071 88,758 159,276 876.00 55,259 102,330 261,606 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices 81 Primary 874.60' 25.0' long x 15.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feel) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coal. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.84 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 tmary OutFlow Mex=0.00 ds Q 5.00 him HW -870.00' (Free Discharge) 11 -Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 da) 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 1006Year Event Rainfelf--5.00° Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/15/2013 HydroCADO 10 00 am OOSO 0 2011 HvdIOCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 65 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Flow Into Pond 1 Runoff 37.01 chs a 12.01 hrs, Volume= 91,211 or, Depth- 4.20" Runoff by SCS TWO method, UH=SCS. Time Spen= 5.00-35.00 hre, dl= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Event Rainfall=8.00" Area (of) CN Description 95,273 98 Paved parking, HSG C 140,233 74 >75% Gress cover, Good, HSG C 14,361 70 Woods, Good. HSG C 10,953 98 Water Surface HSG C 260,820 84 Weighted Average 154,594 59.27% Pervious Area 105,226 40,73% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (MR) (f lsec) (ds) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Event Reinfa11=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Panted 51162013 HYdmCAD010.00 stn D0590 02011 HydmCAD Software Sdutlom LLC Pane 67 Summary for Subcetchment 2S: Flow Into Pond 2 Runoff = 55.99 cls ® 12.01 hre, Volume- 137,958 d, Depth- 4.20" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Event Relnfall=8.00" Area (at) CN Description 150,767 98 Water Surface, HSG C 198,660 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 29,899 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 15.169 98 Water Surface, HSG C 394,495 84 Weighted Average 228,559 57.94% Pervious Area 165,936 42.06% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (fusec) lots) 10,0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Event Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdmCADO 10.00 sm 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 68 Summary for Subcetchment 3S: Flow Into Pond 3 Runoff = 6.34 ds ® 12.01 hre, Volume- 15,694 d, Depth, 4.30" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.D0-38.00 hrs, dt- 0.05 hrs Type II 24hr 100 -Year Event Rainfall -8.00" Area (e0 CN Description 18,991 98 Payed parking, HSG C 23,431 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C _ 3,350 98 Water Surface, HSG C 43,772 85 Weighted Average 23,431 53.53% Pervious Area 20,341 46.47% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (8/ft) (f isec) lois) 10.0 Direct Entry, M M M M M M M M M M M M a M M M M M M 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 11 24 -hr 100.Year Event Rainfal1=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/18/2013 HydroCADO 10,00 s/n 00590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 99 Summary for Subcatchment 20S: S. Rear Yard Flow Runoff = 14.60 cis ® 12.01 hre, Volume- 35,237 cf Depth= 3.58" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 hrs. dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100.Yeer Event Rainfall -8.00" Area (s0 CN Description 18,211 98 Paved parking, HSG C 98937 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSGC 118,148 78 Weighted Average 98,931 83.74% Pervious Area 18,211 18.26% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Desorption (min) (feet) 01110 (Neat) (oh) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Event Ra/nfa11=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/1 612 01 3 HvdroCAD®10.00 do W690 02011 HvdmCAD Soeware Solutions LLC _ Pape 70 Summary for Subcatchment 30S: SE Rear Yards Runoff = 9.37 ds Q 12.01 hra, Volume- 22,616d, Depth= 3.68" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span= 5.00.36.00 hm, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Event Rainfall=8.00" 75,830 78 Weighted Average 64,417 84.95% Pervious Area 11,413 15.05% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (a/sec) (ds) 10.0 Direct Entry, M M M= M i == M== M M= M M 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Typel124-hr 100 -Year Event Rain/ell=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116r2013 HvdmCAD010.00 s/n 00590 02011 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 71 Summary for Subcatchment 408: Connection Flow Runoff 42.70 cis Q 12.01 lits, Volume- 102,870 of, Depth= 3.36' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00.36.00 firs, din 0.05 hre Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Event Rainfall=6.00" 190,828 74 >75% Gress ewer, Good, HSG C 127.319 70 Woods. Good. HSG C 364,495 76 Weighted Average 318,145 87.28% Pervious Area 48,350 12.72% Impervious Arae To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (8/81 (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Typell24-hr 100 -Year Event Rainfall=6.00' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HvdroCAD010.00 On 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Peoe 72 Summery for Subcatchment 60S: NE Rear Yards Runoff - 7.13 cis ® 12.01 line, Volume- 17,251 cf, Depth- 3.68" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH -SCS, Time Span= 5.00-38.00 me, din 0.05 me Type It 24 -hr 100 -Year Event Relmell=8.00" Area (et) CN Description 12,443 98 Paved parking, HSG C 43.817 74 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG C 56,260 79 Weighted Average 43,817 77.88% Pervious Area 12,443 22.12% Impervious Area To Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) ft/ft) (fused (eta) 10.0 Direct Entry, M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ! M 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 Year Event Rainrall=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HydroCADO 10.00 On 00590 02011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pale 73 Summary for Reach 1 R: SW Flow off Site Inflow Area 260,820 if, 40.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 4.14' for 100 -Year Event event Inflow 5.57 ds a 12.35 tire, Volume= 90,012 of Outflow = 5.57 cis ® 12.35 hrs, Volume- 90,012d, Aaen= 0%, Leg- 0.0 min Routing by Slor4nd.Trens method, Time Span= 5.0D-36.00 his, dt= 0.05 hire 112289 Jeurlssen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr IMYear Event Remfell=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5116/2013 HydroCADO 1000 s1r 00.590 02011 HydroCAD SotsaereSdut,onS LLC Paae 74 Summary for Reach 2R: S. Flow off Site Inflow Area 512,643 sf, 36.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 4.03" for 100 -Year Event event Inflow = 21.97 ds ® 12.03 his, Volume= 172,129 d Outflow = 21.97 ds ® 12.03 his, Volume= 172,129 d, Aften= 0%, Lag- 0.0 min Rouang by Stor-Ind-Trans method, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 his 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Typel/24-hr 10O -Year Event Rainfoll=8.00" Prepared by Microsoft Primed 5/182013 HYdroCA13O 1O 00 sm 00590 O 2011 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 75 Summary for Reach 3R: SE Flow off Site Inflow Area = 119,802 of. 26.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth - 3.84' for 100 -Year Event event Inflow 12.47 cis (M 12.02 hre, Volume= 38,307 at Outflow 12.47 cis ® 12.02 hre, Volume- 38,307 cf, Aaen= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Event Rainfall=6.00' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/162013 HydroCAD010.00s/n00590 O2011 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 76 Summary for Reach 4R: Ex. Pond Inflow Area - 364,495 of, 12.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.00" for 100 -Year Event event Inflow 0.00 oh (M 5.00 hre, Volume= 0 of Outflow 0.00 eta Q 5.00 hre, Volume= 0 cf, Atten- 0%, Lag- 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind-Trans method, Time Span- 5.00.36.00 hre, dl= 0.05 hre Routing by Slor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 me, dl= 0.05 hre 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Event Rainfali=6.00' 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type )124 -hr 100 -Year Event Rainfall=6.00' Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/1612013 HvdroCADO 10.00 sin 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pepe 77 HVd.CAD®10 W Nn 00590 02011 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pride 78 Summary for Reach 5R: NE Flow off Site Summary for Pond IP: Pond #1 I or. Area= 56,260 sf, 22.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth• 3.68" for 100 -Year Event event Inflow = 7.13 cis® 12.01 hrs, Volume- 17,251 of Outflow 7.13 cfa ® 12.01 hra, Volume= 17,251 cf, Atien- 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-36.00 ma, or- 0.05 ms Inflow Area • 260,820 at. 40.73% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.20" for 100 -Veer Event event Inflow 37.01 ds ® 12.01 hra, Volume= 91,211 cf OuMow • 5.57 are 12.35 his, Volume= 80,012 cf, Atten- 85%, Lag- 20.4 min Primary 5.57 ch ® 12.35 hra, Volume= 90,012 of Routing by Slor-Intl method, Time Span= 5.00-36.00 ms, dt= 0.05 h s Sterling Elev- 868.50' Surf.Aree= 14,054 sf Storage= 48,865 of Peak Elev- 871.17' 0 12.35 ma Surf.Aree= 18,031 at Storage= 91,587 of (42,722 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 431.8 min calculated for 41,081 cf (45% of Inflow) Canter -of -Mass del. time= 129.9 min (934.0 - 804.1 ) Volume Invert Avail Storane Storage Description 01 862.00' 107,146 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Sud.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -11) (cubic -feel) (cubic,feet) 862.00 4,107 0 0 864.00 5,838 9,945 9,945 866.00 7,969 13,807 23,752 887.50 9,719 13,266 37,018 668.00 11,808 5,382 42,400 868.50 14,054 6,466 48,865 869.50 15,478 14,766 63,631 870.00 16,211 7,922 71,554 871.00 17,719 16,965 88,519 872.00 19,535 18,827 107,146 #1 Primary 888.50' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Oudel Invert= 868.50'/ 868.39' S- 0.0050T Cc- 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends 8 connections, Flow Area= 0.79 of Primary OutFlow Mex=5.57 cis @ 12.35 me HW=871.17' (Free Discharge) 1•Culved (Inlet Controls 5.57 cis Q 7.10 fps) M M M M M M M M M M M M i M M M M M M 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100.Year Event Rainfall=6.00" 112289 Jeurissen Proposed Hydrology Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Event Ra/nfell=-8.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511812017 Prepared by Microsoft Printed 511612013 HydmCADO 10.00 em 00590 m 2011 HwdioCAD Software Solutions LLC Peas 79 HydroCADS 10.00 am 00590 m 2011 HVdnoCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 80 Summary for Pond 213: Pond #2 Inflow Area 394,495 af, 42.106% Impervious, Inflow Depth• 4.20" for 100 -Year Event event Inflow = 55.99 da a 12.01 hre, Volume- 137,958 of Comm = 9.19 cis Q 12.32 his, Volume- 136,892 d, Aden- 64%, Lap= 18.6 min Primary = 9.19 cis a 12.32 hire, Voll 135,892 d Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span- 5.00-36.00 hre, tit= 0.05 hre Starting Elev 880.50' Sud.Area• 17,807 of Storage- 88,953 of Peak Elev= 883.55' Q 12.32 him Surf Area- 22,812 sf Storage- 130,414 d (61,461 d above alert) Flood Elev= 848.50' Surf.Area= 0 sf Storage= 0 of Plug -Flow detention time- 377.9 min calculated for 57,939 of (49% of Inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time- 109,0 min ( 913.1 - 804.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Sioreae Description al 874.00' 152,745 of Custom Stage Data (Prlsmatie)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation SurfArea Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (tie -ft) (cubk>fee0 (cubWee0 874.00 8,842 0 0 876.00 8,938 15,780 15,780 878.00 11,281 20,199 35,979 880.00 13,809 25,070 61,049 880.50 17,807 7,904 68,953 882.00 20,107 28,436 97,389 883.50 22,534 31,981 129,369 884.00 23,372 11,477 140,846 884.50 24,224 11,899 152,745 Device Routine Invert Outlet Devices ai Primary 880.50' 15.0" Round Culvert L=270.0' Ke - 0.500 Inlet /Outlet Invert- 880.50 / 745.50' S= 0.5000 Y Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections, Flow Aree• 1.23 of LmaryOutFI" Mar -9.19 ds ® 12.32 hra HNP883.54' (Free Discharge) I -Culvert (Inlet Controls 9.19 ds ® 7.49 fps) Summary for Pond 3P: Pond #3 Inflow Area 43,772 of, 46.47% Impervious, In0ow Depth' 4.30" for 100 -Year Event event Inflow • 9.34 ds 12.01 his. Volume- 15,994 of Outflow 3.58 de ® 12.12 hre, Volume- 15,892 d, Aften• 43%, Lag- 6.7 min Primary = 3.58 de ® 12.12 hre, Volume- 15,992 of Routing by Stor-Intl method, Time Spen• 5.00.39.00 hre, dt= 0.05 hre Starting Elev 870.50 Surf Area- 2,150 of Storage- 1,381 d Peak Elev= 871.90' 0 12.12 hre Surf.Area- 2,973 of Storage -4.959d (3,578 d above start) Plug -Flow detention time- 99.2 min calculated for 14,310 d (91% of Inflow) Center -of -Maes det. time- 32.1 min 1033.4 - 801.2 ) Volume Invert Aveil.Storeae Storme Description ai 868.00' 8,633 of Custom Stage Data (Prlsmatic)Llated below (Recalc) Elevation Sud.Area Inc.Store Cam.Siore (feat) (sq -ft) (cublc-tee0 (cublafee0 888.00 169 0 0 869.50 542 608 808 870.00 150 198 806 870.50 2,150 575 1,381 872.00 3,034 3,888 5,269 873.00 3,693 3,354 8,833 Inlet / Outlet Invert- 870.50' / 870. n- 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & LmaryOutFlow Max-3be ds ® 12.12 hre HW -871.88' (Free Discharge) 1 -Culvert (Inlet Controls 3.55 de a 4.53 fps) 112289 Jeurlasen Proposed Hydrology Typa 1124-hr 100-Year Event RaImI811=6.00" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 5/16/2013 HYdroCA0O 10.00 sMW690 O2011 HYdmCADSoflwara Solutions LLC Pane 81 Summary for Pond 4P: Ex. Pond #4 Inflow Area • 364,495 sf, 12.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.38" for 100-Year Event event nflow 42.70 cfs 012.01 hre, Volume- 102,670d Outflow = 0.00 cis ® 5.00hrs, Volume- 0 d, Allen- 100%, Lep= 0.0 min Primary • 0.00 cis ® 5.00 hrs, Volume- 0 of Routing by Stor-Intl method, Time Span- 5.0036.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peek Elev- 872.73'@ 24.60hrs SurfAree• 42,398 sf Slorege= 102,868 d Plug-Flow detention time- (not calculated: Initial storage eecedes outflow) Cente,of-Mese del. time- (not calculated: no outilow) Volume Inven Avail Storeae Storms Description a1 870.00' 261,606 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Reralc) Elevation Surf.Aree Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (W-m (cubic-feet) (cublofee0 870.00 32,835 a 0 872.00 39,685 72,520 72,520 874.00 47,071 86,756 159,276 876.00 55,259 102,330 261,606 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 874.60' 25.0' long x 15.0' breadth Broad-Created Rectangular Weir Heed (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coat (English) 2.66 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Primary OulFlow Mac=0.00 de ® 5.00 hrs HW870.00' (Free Discharge) 1•Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Conbuls 0.00 cis) �' 3. �\\��S\\ \'•� \ti t f. f _-- i ``\\ �1 \ ; ;l\\\.` {t t4 t11\ \il ll{ Ir 3. - �� �r`- � -.- > \ �. •� fes..... �..., \.\ .� �•_/ 40S � \ 1 trl a f n' 6J-ter .� _ \\, �` _.1 __ •�.. � ♦1♦. 1 .1 _ 1 \ . > _ <t { � . ,f 11R. f \ � V Xx iA `...;\ \ ��� �'S � r" r,�� _�_ ♦1st■ • '.,. o�. 1 I .d.. �` _ \; \ 1 F, h rte• +}� PIONEEReneng )gyj��zppK >ma�� 165116M-1916 Mmba Huhu, Aff133110 Fss.681_9�9 v�v.pmmeq.com 0111PvaEmv mrx611mHe9Hmlou..v 1 1 1 Appendix B 1 P8 1 Model 1 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P8 Urban Catchment Model, Version 3.4 Startup Case Case Data File Run Date 05/15/13 Case 112289 P857513.p8c FlrstDate 01/01/74 Precip(m) 6271 Title Startup Case LastDate 12/31/94 Rain(in) 527.47 PrecFile Msp5095_pep Events 1539 Snow(in) 99.66 PartFile nurp50.p8p TotalHrs 183720 TotalVrs 20.96 Case Title Startup Case Case Data File 112289 P8 515-13.p8c Path LfEngineenng 3D\112289 Jeunssen ParceMydrology DesigniP8 Modell Case Notes: Proposed Drainage.- Storm Data File Msp5095.pcp Particle File nurp50.p6p Air Temp File File MSp5095.tmp Time Steps Per Hour Minimum Inter -Event Time (hrs) Maximum Confinuity Error % Rainfall Breakpoint (inches) Precipitation Scale Factor Air Temp Offset (deg -F) Loops Thru Storrs File 4 10 2 0.8 1 0 1 Simulation Dates 6/1/1973 1/1/1974 12/31/1994 Snowfall Temperature (deg -I) wMelt Temperature (deg -f) wmell Coef (in/degF-Day) Freeze Temp (deg -F) wmelt Abstraction Factor po-Trans. Calibration Factor wing Season Start Month wing Season End Month 32.0 32.0 006 32.0 1.00 1.00 5 10 ay Antecedent Rainfall + Runoff (inches) Antecedent Moisture Condition AMGII AMGIII wing Season 1.40 2.10 iGmwing Season 0.50 7.10 ' Watershed Data U 1 1 1 1 Watershed Name Drainage IS Drainage 2S Drainage 3S Drainage 4S Runoff to Device Infiltration to Device Watershed Area Basin 1P Basin 2P Basin 3P Basin 4P 5.99 9.05 1 8.36 SCS Curve Number (Pervious) Scale Factor for Pervious Runoff Load Indirectly Connected Impery Fraction 74 74 74 74 1 1 1 1 0.15 0.11 0.05 0.08 UnSwept Impervious Fraction UnSwept Depression Storage (inches) UnSwept Imperv. Runoff Coefficient UnSwept Scale Factor for Particle Loads 0.22 0.17 0.8 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Swept Impervious Fraction Swept Depression Storage (inches) Swept Imperv. Runoff Coefficient Swept Scale Factor for Particle Loads Sweeping Frequency Sweeping Efficiency Sweeping Start Date (MMDD) Sweeping Stop Date (MMDD) 0 0 0 0 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 101 101 101 101 1231 1231 1231 1 1231 ' Device Data 1 1 1J 1 1 u 1 Device Name Basin 1P Basin 2P Basin 3P Basin 4P Device Type Infiltration Outlet Normal Outlet Spillway Outlet POND POND POND POND Partite Removal Scale Factor Bottom Elevation (ft) Bottom Area (acres) Permanent Pod Area (acres) Permanent Pod Volume (ac ft) Penn Pod Infft Rate (in/hr) Flood Pod Area (acres) Flood Pod Volume (ac -ft) Flood Pod Infilt Rate (in/hr) Infilt Basin Void Fraction (%) 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.09 0.016 0.01 0.435 0.3226 0.4088 0.0494 0.7538 1.12 1.58 0.0317 3.015 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.449 0.5561 0.0848 1.2688 1.338 1.93 0.198 6M6 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 Detention Pond Outlet Parameters Outlet Type Outlet Orifice Diameter (in) Onfice Discharge Coef Outlet Weir Length (ft) Weir Discharge Coat Perforated Riser Height (ft) Number of Holes in Riser Holes Diameter Flood Pod Drain Time (firs) ORIFICE ORIFICE ORIFICE ORIFICE 12 15 12 12 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Swale Parameters Length or Flow Path (ft) Slope of Flow Path % Bottom Width (ft) Side Slope (ft-v/R-h) Maximum Depth of Flow (ft) Mannings n Constant Hydraulic Model Pipe, Splitter, Aquifer Parameter Hydraulic Res. Time (hrs) Particle Data Particle File nurp50. p6p 99000 600000 13600 2000 Particle Class PO% P10% P30% P50% P80% Filtration Efficiency (%) 90 100 100 100 100 Settling Velocity (ft/hr) 0 0.03 0.3 1.5 15 First Order Decay Rate (1/day) 0 0 0 0 0 2nd Order Dewy (1/day-ppm) 0 0 0 0 0 Impervious Runoff Conn (ppm) t 0 0 0 0 Pervious Runoff Conc (ppm) 1 100 too 100 200 Pervious Com Exponent 0 1 1 1 1 Accum. Rate Obs -ac -day) 0 1.75 1 75 1.75 3.5 Parade Removal Rate (Ilday) 0 0.25 025 0.25 0.25 Washoff Coefficient 0 20 20 20 20 Washoff Exponent 0 2 2 2 2 Sweeper Eficiency, 0 0 0 5 15 ty Component Data Name i TSS TP TKN CU PB ZN HC Content Scale Factor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Partide Composition (mg/kg) % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 99000 600000 13600 2000 640000 250000 1000000 3850 15000 340 too 1600 22500 1000000 3850 15000 2!2100 1600 22500 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 22500 1000000 0 0 340 180 0 22500 PB Urban Caed~ Motla, Vasbn 3.4 Type. NONE Run Data 05115113 Ca. 112289 M&1S13.PBc FntDele 0101774 Predp(in) 627.1 Title Startup Case lastDate 1MIM Ranlin) 527.47 PraFle Msp5095. pcp Enr4a 1539 Snow(m) 9986 PartFile-rP50.Pap TaaHrs 183720 Tota(rs 20.96 MassBalarPs by Device Deuce: OVERALI Type. NONE Fb Loads(IM) Cancentrau-(PPM) Mass Baance To a..ft P096 p10% P30% P50% P86% TSS TP TKN CU PB IN HC PO% P10% P30% P50% PBO% TSS TP TM CU PB M 01 wat.V*dinfic 357.54 971.80 2416626 24166.26 24166.26 48332.53 120831.32 375.33 1670.56 5430 23,69 737% 296185 1.10 24.87 2467 2487 49.74 12434 0.39 1.72 006 0.02 078 03 Mftrale 213.30 579.58 1435.86 177.86 40.45 9.45 166281 63.74 372.55 8.45 146 373.58 182.31 100 2.48 0.31 0.07 0.02 2.87 011 0.64 0.01 000 084 04e Itrdte 21330 57.96 000 0.00 0.00 OW 0.00 5.74 34.78 079 0.12 37.09 1449 0.10 0.01 006 010 000 0.06 05 fi8en 000 52183 1435.86 177.06 4045 9.45 1662.81 5801 337.78 766 134 33649 167.82 000 000 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 DOD 86nor owat 14263 381.51 7691.98 5878.03 3358.13 1075.35 18006.49 102.95 482.87 11.31 400 271.26 500.52 0.98 1915 15.16 866 277 46,45 027 1.25 003 001 0.70 07 sp91r4y oullk 147 400 60236 57234 47686 267.06 1938.42 875 2717 071 036 520 44.61 100 15064 143.13 11921 7179 484.P 169 6.79 0.18 009 1.30 OBse6 -oec 0.00 DOD 14132.97 17538.84 2029183 46960.67 99223.51 20121 783.94 33.74 1786 83.62 2232.53 000 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 000 000 000 000 09tobAkA w 357.54 971.80 2416626 2416626 2416626 4833253 120931.32 37533 1670.56 54.30 2369 73795 296165 100 24.87 2487 24.87 4934 12434 0.39 1.72 0.06 002 0.76 10surtare PMoe 144.10 385.51 8297.34 5450.36 3834.79 136241 19944.91 109.71 510.04 1202. 4.36 276.46 545.14 0.98 2118 16.47 979 348 50.92 OR 1.30 003 001 071 11 groI cuNo 21330 57% OW 000 000 080 0.00 574 34.78 0.79 0.12 3709 14.49 0.10 0.01 006 000 0.00 O.W 12 total adfiow 35741 443A7 8297.34 605036 3834.79 136241 19944.91 11545 544.82 12.81 448 313.55 559.63 046 8.54 684 3.95 1.40 21153 0.12 0.56 001 0.00 0.32 13 Wad trapped 0.00 52183 1586883 17715.90 20331.47 46970.12 100886.32 259.22 112172 41.40 1920. 420Al 2400.35 14 storage inoea: 0.14 661 0.09 000 000 000 009 065 3.96 0.09 001 423 185 15 mass baa. 000 0.10 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.01 005 000 000 0.06 0.03 Load ReoWbw0 000 53-68 65.67 73.31 64.13 97.18 83.49 6908 67.15 7624 81.05 5693 81.05 Deuce: Basin 1P Type- POND Flow Loads(ft) CPamaatlana(w,,) Mass BaMnm Te: acre -8 POs9 P10% P30% P50% P80% TSS TP TKN CU PB ZN HC PO% P10% P30% P50% P80% TSS TP TKN CU pB 71'1 01 waarafied irslc 99.51 270.46 6560.13 6560.13 6560.13 1312026 3280064 102.55 457.48 14.83 645 204.59 865.63 1.50 2426 24.26 2426 48.51 12128 0.38 1.69 0.05 002 078 03 infi8rate 88.13 239.53 57170 0650 1540 3.54 659.15 28.24 153.55 348 0.60 15435 7471 1.00 2.39 029 006 001 2.75 011 064 0.01 0.00 064 04 eGroate 88.13 23.95 0.00 DOD 0.00 0. W 0.00 2.37 14.37 0.33 006 15.33 5.99 0.10 0.01 0.06 0.00 0 DO 0.06 OSfiBerw DOD 215.58 571.70 68.50 15.40 3.54 659.15 23.87 139.18 3.16 055 139.02 8873 0.00 000 0.00 0O0 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06namaaWet 10.78 2929 1633.50 133370 81525 259.91 4042.37 1746 74.31 1.77 0.79 2460 98.28 100 55.77 45.53 27.83 687 138.00 0.50 254 008 0.03 0.85 D/ spilway br4let 0.60 1.64 238.49 22545 184.14 102.69 750.78 2.66 1070 028 014 2.08 17.30 1.00 14580 137.83 112.57 62.78 458.99 162 6.54 0.17 006 127 86 sedimen+da 0.00 000 411843 493247 5545.37 12754.11 27348.34 56.19 21891 9.30 492 23.35 61530 000 000 000 0.00 000 000 000 DOD 000 000 w kxalirR 9951 77048 6560.13 6560.13 656013 13120.28 32800.64 10255 45/.48 14.83 645 204.59 8D5.63 180 2426 2426 2426 48.51 12128 0.38 189 005 0.02 0.76 10surtaceoWoe 11.38 30.93 187199 1559.16 999.39 362.60 4793.14 20.12 85.02 205 092 2688 11558 1.00 6053 5041 32.31 11.72 15498 065 275 0.07 0.03 087 11 goo M o O 88.13 23.95 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 237 1437 033 005 1533 599 0.10 0.01 006 DOD 0.00 OW 12 totals 99.51 5488 1871.99 1559.16 999.39 362.60 479314 22.49 99.39 2.38 0.97 4221 12157 020 6.92 5.76 370 1.34 1772 0.08 0.37 Dol 000 0.16 13 total trapped 000 215.58 4688.13 5000.97 5560.74 1275785 28007.50 80.05 358.10 12,45 5A7 162.37 684.06 14 storage irtaea: 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 000 0.00 000 0DO 000 000 000 0.00 15 mass tulartca 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DOD 000 000 000 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 Load ReoWbbn(I GOO 79.71 7146 76.23 64.77 97.24 85.39 7807 7828 83.98 84.91 79.37 81.91 Deuce Satin 2P Type: POND Flow Loads(15s) Concanaatlma(Ppm) Masa Balance To a re4t Ply% P10% P30% P50% P80% TSS TP TKN CU p8 n HC PO% P10% P30% P50% P80% TSS TP TIP! CU PB M 01 wafeaned irAc 127.10 345.45 8696.46 868646 8MA6 17372.91 43132.28 13453 598.16 1947 851 26278 1063.59 100 25A5 2515 25.15 50.29 12573 039 173 006 0.02 078 03irAlbate 107.88 29320 69330 83,79 19.14 4.62 800.86 3209 187.87 426 073 18892 91.32 100 236 029 0.07 002 273 0.11 064 0.01 000 0.64 04 e481tra4e 10788 29.32 000 0.00 0.00 000 000 290 17.59 040 006 1677 733 OAA 001 006 0.00 000 0.06 05 fitlared 000 28368 693.30 8379 1914. 4.62 800.86 29.19 170.27 3.86 0.67 170.16 83.99 0.00 000 0.00 050 0.00 000 000 0DO 0.00 DOD 0O0 06 norma outlet 1822 4952 263745 2222.95 1403.97 554.06 6878.43 29.33 12488 3.02 1.34 4784 167.59 180 53.27 44.90 29.97 11.19 139.33 0.59 252 006 0.03 085 07 spMay Putlet 0.87 236 363.87 348.88 292.52 184.37 116764 4.10 16,47 0.44 0.22 3.12 27.31 100 153.99 146.80 123.80 7803 502.62 1.73 697 0.18 0.09 132 OB aafima+da 0.00 000 4 1.78 603283 6890.82 16629.87 34545.30 6697 268.73 1175 622 MM M27 000 000 000 0.00 000 0.10 000 0.00 0.00 000 09 tato irllow 127.10 345.45 8688.46 8686.46 8886.46 1737291 43432.28 134.53 SO 16 1947. 8.51 262.78 1063.59 100 25.15 2515 25.15 50.29 125.73 0.39 1.73 006 002 076 losudaceo o 1909 51.88 3001.32 2559.84 177649 738.42 8086.07 33.42 141.34 345 1.56 4496 19491 1.00 57.86 49.54 3425 14.23 15588 084 272 007 003 0.87 11 qva oWb 10788 29.32 000 000 000 000 000 290 17.59 0.40 006 18T7 733 0.10 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.86 12 Iota outlbw 126.% 8120 5001.32 2569.84 177649 736.42 X07 36.33 158.91 385 1.62 6373 20224 024 8.70 745 5.15 2.14 2343 OAA 046 001 0.00 018 13 luta trapped 0OD 263.88 5685.08 611662 690997 16634.49 3531816 98.16 439.00 15.61 6.% 198.82 861.26 14 storage ilea 0.13 036 006 0.00 000 000 0.06 0.04 022 000 000 023 009 is masa balance 0.00 000 0OD 000 000 0.00 000 000 000 000 0.00 000 000 Loaf Reston P Device: Basin 3P Mats Balercs Td 01 viatentlni inflc 03infitlrate 04 a dfiltrate OS6tlenecl O6 somal outlet 08 seEin en+ Dec 09 total n1l. 10 surface aulfioa 11 gro n ouMo 12 total arMav 13 total trapped 14 storage Increa: 15 mass Balance Loaf ReOonon P Device: Basin 4P Masa Balance Ta 01 watersne0 v l< O6 normal aRlet OB sedimen +sec 09 total inflow 10 surface outfio4 12 total ou8lox 13 total trapped 14 storage inwea: 15 loess balance Load Re 1mbon (° 0.00 76.39 65.45 70.42 79.55 9575 8138 72.97 73.39 W18 W98 75.86 80.98 Type: POND 000 0.00 100 1428 8w 0.97 o.W 000 1.00 2076 2076 Flay Loads(I5s) 8.08 0.10 000 0.06 063 8.32 470 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 arse -11 PO% P10% P30% P50% P80% TSS TP TKN CD PB ZN HC 4143 112.60 233743 233743 2337.43 461486 11687.16 W14 17274 5.50 233 83.28 291.11 1729 4685 170.85 24.76 590 1.28 202.80 5.41 31.13 071 0.13 30.30 1627 1729 488 000 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.46 281 0.06 0.01 300 1.17 0.00 42.16 170&5 24.76 5.90 128 202.80 4.95 28.32 064 0.12 21.31 15.10 2413 65.74 936.46 529.71 2(16.89 55.75 1T28.80 12.95 64.54 1.48 044 4475 55.33 0.00 0.00 1230.12 1782.96 212464 461783 9755.55 1978 7107 3.32 176 822 21950 4143 11260 2337.43 2337.43 233743 467486 11687.16 38.14 172.74 5.50 233 83.28 291.11 24.13 65.74 936.46 529.71 206.89 55.75 1728.80 12% 64.54 148 041 44.75 55.33 1729 468 000 000 000 000 000 046 281 0.06 0.01 3.00 1.17 4143 70.43 936.46 529.71 206.89 55.75 1728.80 1341 67.35 155 0.45 4775 5650 0.00 42.16 1400.98 180772 2130.55 4619.12 9958.36 24.73 105.39 3% 1.88 35.53 234.60 0.00 001 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.01 000 000 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 3744 59.94 71.34 91.15 98.81 W21 64.83 61.01 7192 80.59 4266 W59 Type: POND Flux Loa6s(Ilos) arre8 PO% P10% P30% PWe P805: TBS TP TM CD PB ZN HC 89.51 243.29 6582.25 6582.25 658225 13164.50 3291124 100.11 442.17 14W 641 18730 801.32 89.51 236.95 2487.58 1791645 852.02 205.63 5336.89 43.21 219.14 5.04 1.43 Mae 179.32 0.00 0.00 4094.64 47W 59 5730.23 12958.86 27574.31 W27 219.23 9 38 4.% 23.38 620.42 8951 243.29 6582.25 658225 658225 13164.50 3291124 100.11 442.17 14.W 641 187.30 801.32 89.51 236.95 2487.58 1791.66 852.02 Miw 53"1.89 43.21 219.14 504 1.43 15986 17932 89.51 236.95 2487.58 179116 852 02 205.63 5336.89 Q21 219.14 5.04 143 159.86 179.32 0.00 0.00 4094.64 4790.59 5730.23 12958.86 27574.31 5.27 21923 9.38 4.% 2338 620.42 0.00 623 0.03 0.00 000 0.00 003 0.62 3.74 0.08 001 3.99 1.5 000 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.01 006 000 090 006 0.03 0.W 0.00 62.21 72.78 87.06 99.44 61.78 5.21 49.5 64.5 T,42 1249 T 42 conoaltrati(ppm) PW% Po% P10% P30% 1.00 20.76 20.76 1.00 363 0.53 010 000 000 000 000 0.00 100 1428 8w 0.97 o.W 000 1.00 2076 2076 1 W 14.28 8.08 0.10 000 0.06 063 8.32 470 Casenealions (ppm) PW% PO% P10% P30% 1 W 27.06 27.06 0.97 1022 738 0 34 000 000 190 27.06 2706 0.97 1022 TW 0.97 10.22 7.36 P50% PW% TBS TP TM Cu PB ZN 2076 41 52 103.79 0 34 1.53 0 05 0.02 074 0.13 003 4.31 0.12 066 0.02 0.00 0.61 071 0.18 0.90 0.01 006 0.00 000 0.06 000 Dw 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 3.15 0.85 26.36 020 0% 0.02 001 068 0.00 aw 0.80 0.00 0.00 000 000 000 M.76 41.52 103.79 0.34 1.53 0.05 0.02 014 3.15 085 26.36 0.20 0.98 0.02 0.01 068 0.01 0.06 Dw 000 006 1.84 0.50 15.35 0.12 060 001 Dw 0.42 P50% PBO% TSS 27.06 54.11 135.28 3 W 0.85 2194 000 0.00 000 27W 54.11 135.28 3.50 065 2194 3.W 085 21.94 TP TM CD PB ZN 041 1.82 0.06 003 071 0.18 0.90 002 0.01 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 041 1.82 008 003 071 0.18 0.90 0.02 001 05 018 090 0.02 001 066 Appendix C Supporting Documents I 1 I I I ■ December 20, 2012 Mr. Joe Jablonski Lennar- Minnesota Division 16305 36th Ave N. Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 HGTS Project Number: 12-398 Re: Geotechnical Exploration Report Proposed Liberty at Creek Side Residential Development Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Mr. Jablonski: We have completed the geotechnical exploration report for the proposed Liberty at Creek Side residential development in Chanhassen, Minnesota. The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and ground water conditions and provide recommendations for site grading and foundation support for the proposed residential development. In general, the soil borings encountered varying depths of topsoil overlying clayey soils to the termination depths of the borings. The soils are generally suitable for construction of the proposed residential development. Specific details regarding our procedures, results and recommendations follow in the attached geotechnical exploration report. Our services were performed in accordance with Haugo GeoTechmcal Services LLC Proposal 12-398 dated October 23, 2012. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Paul Gionfriddo at 763-954-1101 or Joe Westphal at 612-26914027. Sincerely, Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC. Paul S. Gionfriddo P.E. Joe Westphal, P.E. Consulting Engineer Project Engineer 13570 GRDVV DRIVE *279, MAvLt: GRDVL, MN 5531 1 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PROJECT: Proposed Liberty at Creek Side Residential Development Chanhassen, Minnesota PREPARED FOR: Mr. Joe Jablonski Lermw - Minnesota Division 16305 36th Ave N. Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 PREPARED BY: Haugo GeoTechnical Services 13570 Grove Drive #278 Maple Grove, MN 55311 Haugo GeoTechnical Services Project 12-398 December 20, 2012 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. Consulting Engineer License Number 23093 December 20, 2012 LtGEtlS£`J �'.. 4A^'cS �E 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project description Lennar Corporation is proposing to develop an approximate 25.6 acres parcel near the intersections of U. S. Highway 212 and Pioneer trail in Chanhassen, MN. Development plans include removing or demolishing the existing structures on the property and ' preparing approximately fifty eight (58) single family residential lots. Development plans also include constructing the associated streets and underground utilities. Lennar Corporation retained Haugo GeoTechnical Services to perform a geotechnical exploration to evaluate the suitability of site soil conditions to support the anticipated residential structures and provide recommendation for site development. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and provide recommendations for site development. 1.3 Site Description The project site is generally located south of County Road 18 (a.k.a. Riley Lake Road) north of Pioneer Trial, east of Audubon Road and west of U.S. Highway 212. More ' specifically, Bluff Creek borders the project site to the south and U.S. Highway 212 borders the site to the east The land is currently being used for agricultural purposes. The ground surface can be described as gently rolling with elevations at the boring locations ranging from about 914 to 869. Surficial drainage is generally to the south toward Bluff Creek or to the northeast toward wetlands off the project site. At the time of this report a farmstead existed in the southeast quadrant of the property. The farmstead included a single family residence, bam and silo. Foundation remnants of former structures were also observed on the property. We understand the farmstead will be either removed or demolished to make way for the proposed development. The remaining portion of the property was vacant/agricultural land. 1.4 Scope of Services Our services were performed in accordance with Haugo GeoTechnical Services LLC proposal 12-398 dated October 23, 2012. Our scope of services was performed under the terms of our General Conditions and limited to the following tasks: Completing five (5) standard penetration test borings each to a nominal depth of 15 feet After authorization, Lennar requested an additional five soil borings to a nominal depth of 15 feet for a total of ten (10) soil borings for the project. Visually/manually classify samples recovered from the soil borings. • Performing laboratory tests on selected samples. • Preparing soil boring logs describing the materials encountered and the results of groundwater level measurements. • Preparing an engineering report describing soil and groundwater conditions, and providing recommendations for site grading and foundation support. 1.5 Documents Provided We were provided two plan sheets for the project. One plan sheet was titled "Concept Plan 5, Liberty at Creek Side'. This plan sheet showed the proposed site layout and included site data such as lot sizes, number of lots, set back distances and zoning information. The plan sheet was dated March 7, 2012 and was prepared by Pioneer Engineering. The second plan sheet was for titled "Soil Borings, Juerissen Parcel'. This plan sheet showed the soil boring locations (surveyed after the soil borings were completed) and existing site contours. The plan was dated November 9, 2102 and was also prepared by Pioneer Engineering. Specific design information, site drawings, site contours or house styles were not available at the time of this report. 1.6 Locations and Elevations The soil borings were taken at the approximate locations as shown on the plan sheets provided by Lennar. The ground surface elevations at the boring locations were included on the "Soil Boring"plan sheet as provided by Lennar and prepared Pioneer Engineering - The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the "Soil Boring Location Sketch' in the appendix. The sketch was prepared by Pioneer Engineering. 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES Ten (10) standard penetration test borings were advanced on November 28, 2012 by HGTS with a rotary drilling rig, using continuous flight augers to advance the boreholes. Representative samples were obtained from the borings, using the split -barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM Specification D-1586. In the split -barrel sampling procedure, a 2 -inch O.D. split -barrel spoon is driven into the ground with a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18 -inch penetration is recorded as the standard penetration resistance value, or 'N' value. The results of the standard penetration tests are indicated on the boring log. The samples were sealed in containers and provided to HGTS for testing and soil classification. A field log of each boring was prepared by the HGTS drill crew. The logs contain visual classifications of the soil materials encountered during drilling, as well as the driller's interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples and water observation notes. The final boring logs included with this report represent an interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on visual/ manual method observation of the samples. ■ The soil boring logs, general terminology for soil description and identification, and classification of soils for engineering purposes are also included in the appendix. The soil boring logs identify and describe the materials encountered, the relative density or consistency based on the Standard Penetration resistance (N -value, "blows per foot') and groundwater observations. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions, variations can occur beyond the location of the boring. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Conditions Each of the soil borings encountered clay topsoil at the surface. The topsoil was dark brown to black in color, contained some roots and was judged to be slightly organic. The topsoil ranged in thickness from about rh foot to 5 feet but was mostly about 1 foot thick Below the topsoil the borings encountered native lean clay of sandy lean clay glacial till to the termination depths of the borings at about 15 feet below the ground surface. The exception was soil boring TH-3. Below the topsoil, soil boring TH-3 encountered about 5 feet of dark brown silty clay which was underlain by about 5 feet of black slightly organic silty clay that extended to a depth of about 12 feet below the ground surface. Below the black silty clay the boring encountered lean clay with sand glacial till to the termination depth of the boring at about 15 feet. Penetration resistance values (N -Values), shown as blows per foot (bpf) on the boring logs, within the clayey soils ranged from 3 to 22 bpf with most of the values between 9 and 16 bpf. These values indicate that the clayey soils had a soft to very stiff consistency but were rather stiff to stiff overall. 3.3 Groundwater Ground water was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling or after removing the augers from the boreholes. It appears that groundwater was below the depths explored. However, given the cohesive nature of the soil encountered, it is likely that insufficient time was available for groundwater to seep into the boring(s) and rise to its hydrostatic level. In addition the sandy lean clay glacial till can contain sand seams or sand layers and ground water can be encountered within them. These sand seams or layers, if any, may not become apparent until construction. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the groundwater levels should be expected. Groundwater measurements were made as noted and shown on the boring logs. Groundwater monitoring wells or piezometers would be required to more accurately determine water levels. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the groundwater levels should be expected. 3.4 laboratory Tests Laboratory moisture content tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the soil borings. Table 1 below summarizes the results of the laboratory moisture content tests. Results of the laboratory moisture content tests ranged from 15 to 24 percent and are shown on the boring logs adjacent to the sample tested. Table 1. Summary of Laboratory Tests Boring Number Sample Number Depth feet Moisture Content % TH-01 S-2 21/2 21 TH-02 5-11 712 18 TH-03 5-20 1212 24 TH-04 5-24 5 16 TH-05 5-52 5 15 TH-06 5-65 212 16 TH-07 5-59 5 18 TH-08 S-31 5 19 TH-09 S-37 21/2 19 TH-10 S47 10 22 We also performed laboratory "pocket penetrometer" tests on selected samples recovered from the borings. The pocket penetrometer uses a calibrated spring to estimate the soils unconfined compressive strength. Pocket penetrometer results ranged ' 3/4 ton per square foot (tsf) to 41h tsf. Results are shown on the boring log adjacent to the sample tested. ' 3.5 OSHA Soil Classification The soils encountered in the borings were cohesive materials including. clay, sandy lean clay, lean clay, lean clay with sand and silty clay. The soils identified in the borings will generally be Type B soils under Department of labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. 1 I 1 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Proposed Construction The project consists of removing the farmstead and associated structures and remnants of the former structures and preparing lots and house pads to accommodate approximately 58 single family residential structures. The project also includes construction of new streets and underground utilities. We understand that the specific style of home proposed for each lot has not yet been determined. We assume the new homes could include full basements, walk -out or look- out style structures. We anticipate that the new homes will include one or two stories above grade. The new homes will likely consist of cast -in-place concrete or masonry block foundation walls supported on concrete spread footings. We anticipate above grade construction to consist of wood framing, a pitched roof and asphalt shingles. Based on the assumed construction we estimate wall loadings will range from about 1 to 2 kips (1,000 to 2,000 pounds) per lineal foot and column loads, if any will be less than 50 kips (50,000 pounds). 4.2 Discussion The soil borings completed for this project encountered clayey soils that were generally suitable for support of the proposed residential development. However some soil corrections will be required. Soil corrections will include removing the vegetation and topsoil encountered at the surface in each boring and removing any buried topsoil and soft soil encountered within the proposed building pads, roadways and utility trenches. Soil boring TH-3 encountered buried topsoil that extended to a depth of about 10 feet and soil boring TH-10 encountered soft clays to a depth of about 10 feet below the ground surface. In-place soil moisture contents ranged from about 15 to 24 percent These moisture contents appear to be above the soils estimated optimum moisture content. If the on-site soil will be used as fill or backfill we anticipate that some drying of these soils will be required. The summer months are typically more favorable for drying soils. As mentioned above, we understand the farmstead will be removed in preparation for ' site development. An evaluation of the property or structures on the property for environmental concerns was beyond the scope of this evaluation The farmstead may have septic systems, private water wells or possibly underground fuel oil (heating oil) ' tank(s) located on the property. We recommend these structures, if encountered, be removed and/or abandoned in accordance with the appropriate local, state and federal rules and regulations. ' The following sections provide recommendations for site development. 7 u 1 4.3 Mass Grading Recommendations Excavation We recommend that all vegetation, topsoil, fill, organic soils, and any other soft or loose soil be removed from the proposed building and oversize area. The ' following table indicates the anticipated excavation depths at the boring locations within the building pad areas. Excavation depths may vary and could be deeper. We further recommend that any building remnants or debris associated with demolition of the existing farmstead structures including footings, foundation walls, floor slabs and utilities, if encountered, be removed from within the building and oversize areas. Table 2. Anticipated Excavation Depths Boring Number Approximate Surface Elevation (feet) Anticipated Excavation Depth (feet)* Anticipated Excavation Elevation (feet)* Anticipated Groundwater Elevation (feet)* TH-01 9062 1 905 NE TH-02 914.1 1 913 NE TH-03 885.0 12 873 NE TH-04 892.3 1h 892 NE TH-05 893A 1h 893 NE TH-06 886.7 1h 886 NE TH-07 8929 1h 8921h NE TH-08 873.9 1 872 NE TH-09 875A 1 8741h NE TH-10 869.3 5 to 12 8641h to 8571h NE NE = Not Encountered. * Excavation depths and elevation were rounded to the nearest % foot Fill required to attain site grades and may consist of any debris -free, nonorganic mineral ' soil. Soils identified as sandy lean clay, lean clay, lean clay with sand and silty clay are generally suitable for use or re -use as fill or backfill provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious material. Some moisture conditioning (drying) of these soils will likely be required to meet the recommended compaction levels. The exception being within 3 feet of the groundwater table where granular soil with less than 7 percent passing the number 200 sieve and at least 50 percent retained on the number 40 sieve ' should be used. There does not appear to be any material on-site meeting this requirement Organic soils, including soils that are black in color, topsoil, peat, organic silt, organic ' clay, if encountered, during soil corrections are not suitable for reuse as fill or backfill. It may be possible to re -use these materials in "green areas' on the site such as landscaping berms. ' Backfilling We recommend that backfill placed to attain site grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698), except the upper 3 feet of pavement areas, where the compaction level should be increased to a minimum of 100 percent Fill should be placed within 3 percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin lifts and be compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode. In areas where fill depths will exceed 10 feet we recommend that compaction levels be increased to minimum of 98 percent of the materials standard Proctor density. Even with the increased compaction levels a construction delay may be appropriate to allow for post construction settlement of the fill mass. Fill and backfill placed on slopes must be "benched" into the underlying suitable soil to reduce the potential for slip planes to develop between the fill and underlying soil. We recommend "benching" or excavating into the slope at 5 feet vertical intervals to key the fill into the slope. We recommend each bench be a minimum of 10 feet wide. Foundations We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 42 inches below the exterior grade for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed immediately below the slab provided construction does not occur during below freezing weather conditions. Foundation elements in unheated areas should bear at least 5 feet below exterior grade for frost protection. We anticipate the foundations and floor slabs will bear on compacted engineered fill or native silty clay or sandy lean clay glacial till soils. It is our opinion the footings can be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure up to 2,000 psf. We anticipate total and differential settlement of the foundations will be less than 1 inch and 1h inch, respectively. 4.4 Interior Slabs The anticipated floor subgrade is granular fill over compacted clay fill or native clay soils. It is our opinion a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 200 pounds per square inch of deflection (psi) may be used to design the floor. ' If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, we recommend that a vapor retarder or vapor barrier be placed immediately beneath the slab. Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor barrier or vapor retarder beneath a layer ' of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage, but this practice often traps water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. Regardless of where the vapor retarder or vapor barrier is placed, we recommend consulting the floor covering manufacturer regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or vapor barrier to preserve the warranty. ' 45 Below Grade Walls Foundation walls or below grade (basement) walls will have lateral loads from the ' surrounding soil transmitted to them. The site soils are predominantly clayey in composition. We recommend general waterproofing of the below grade walls. We 1 recommend either placing drainage composite against the backs of the exterior walls or backfilling adjacent to the walls with sand having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing the #40 sieve and less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the #200 sieve. The sand backfill should be placed within 2 feet horizontally of the wall. We recommend the balance of the backfill for the walls consist of sand however the sand may contain up to 20 percent of the particles by weight passing the #200 sieve. Clay may be used to make up the balance of the wall backfill. However consolidation of the clay under its own weight can be expected to continue even after construction. If not accommodated for, structures supported on the clay backfill could settle unfavorably or be damaged. If clay backfill is used, we recommend that construction of grade supported slabs not occur immediately after the below grade walls are backfilled to allow for consolidation/settlement of the clay backfill. The amount of consolidation could range from approximately 1 to 3 percent of the backfill thickness or wall height. We recommend installing drain tile behind the below grade walls, adjacent to the wall footing and below the slab elevation. Preferably the dram tile should consist of perforated pipe embedded in gravel. A geotextile filter fabric should encase the pipe and gravel. The drain tile should be routed to a storm sewer, sump pump or other suitable disposal site. Active earth pressures can be used to design the below grade walls if the walls are allowed to rotate slightly. If wall rotation cannot be tolerated then below grade wall design should be based on at -rest earth pressures. We recommend soil parameters found below in Table 3, be used for below grade/retaining wall design. These design parameters are based on the assumptions that the walls are drained, there are no surcharge loads within a horizontal distance equal to the height of the wall and the backfill is level. Table 3. Soil Parameters Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the wall footings and by sliding resistance along the bottom of the wall footings. We recommend a sliding coefficient of 0.35. This value does not include a factor of safety. 4.6 Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs will likely be underlain by clayey soils (lean clay, sandy lean clay, silty ' clay) which are considered highly frost susceptible. If these soils become saturated and freeze, significant heave may occur. This heave can be a nuisance in front of doors and at other critical grade areas. One way to help reduce the potential for heaving is to remove the frost -susceptible soils below the slabs down to bottom of footing grades, and replace them with non -frost -susceptible backfill consisting of sand having less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the number 200 sieve 11 Estimated Estimated At -Rest Active Soil Passive Soil Unit Weight Friction Angle Pressure Pressure Pressure Soil T ( (degrees) Clay 130 28 70 50 360 Sand 115 32 60 35 375 Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the wall footings and by sliding resistance along the bottom of the wall footings. We recommend a sliding coefficient of 0.35. This value does not include a factor of safety. 4.6 Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs will likely be underlain by clayey soils (lean clay, sandy lean clay, silty ' clay) which are considered highly frost susceptible. If these soils become saturated and freeze, significant heave may occur. This heave can be a nuisance in front of doors and at other critical grade areas. One way to help reduce the potential for heaving is to remove the frost -susceptible soils below the slabs down to bottom of footing grades, and replace them with non -frost -susceptible backfill consisting of sand having less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the number 200 sieve 11 If this approach is used and the excavation bottoms terminate in non -free draining granular soil we recommend a drain file be installed along the bottom outer edges of the excavation to collect and remove any water that may accumulate within the sand. The ' bottom of the excavation should be graded away from the building. If the banks of the excavations to remove the frost -susceptible soils are not sloped, t abrupt transitions between the frost -susceptible and non -frost -susceptible backfill will exist along which unfavorable amounts of differential heaving may occur. Such transitions could exist between exterior slabs and sidewalks, between exterior slabs and pavements and along the slabs themselves if the excavations are confined to only the building entrances. To address this issue we recommend sloping the excavations to remove frost -susceptible soils at a minimum 3:1 (horizontal: vertical) gradient. An alternative method of reducing frost heave is to place a minimum of 2 inches of extruded polystyrene foam insulation beneath the slabs and extending it about 4 feet beyond the slabs. The insulation will reduce frost penetration into the underlying soil and reduce heave. Six to 12 inches of granular soil is typically placed over the insulation to protect it during construction. Another alternative for reducing frost heave is to support the slabs on frost depth footings. A void space of at least 4 inches should be provided between the slab and the underlying soil to allow the soil to heave without affecting the slabs. 4.7 Site Grading and Drainage We recommend the site be graded to provide positive nm -off away from the proposed ' buildings. We recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the building and slabs be sloped a minimum of 2 inches. In addition we recommend downspouts with long splash blocks or extensions for each house. ' 4.8 Utilities We anticipate that the utilities will be supported on variety of native glacially deposited soils or compacted engineered fill following soil corrections. We recommend removing all organic soils, soft or other unsuitable soil, if any, beneath utilities prior to placement. We recommend bedding material be thoroughly compacted around the pipes. We recommend trench backfill above the pipes be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent beneath slabs and pavements, the exception being within 3 feet of the proposed pavement subgrade, where 100 percent of standard Proctor density is required. In landscaped areas we recommend a minimum compaction of 90 percent. ' 4.9 Pavements We recommend that pavements be designed and constructed in accordance with City of Chanhassen standard plates. The following paragraphs provide general pavement ' recommendations in the absence of City of Chanhassen standard plates. 1 We recommend removing all vegetation, topsoil, or other unsuitable materials from within 3 feet of the pavement subgrade elevation. Backfill, if needed, to attain pavement subgrade elevation can consist of any mineral soil provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious materials. We recommend compacting the backfill at moisture contents within a range of 1 percentage point below and 3 percentage points above its optimum moisture content. The upper 3 feet of fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. Prior to placing the aggregate base (Class 5) we recommend proof rolling the pavement subgrade to identify soft, weak, loose or unstable areas that may require additional subcuts. We anticipate the subgrade soil will be predominantly clayey in nature (sandy lean clay, lean clay or silty clay). Because of the poor frost/drainage properties of the clay subgrade soil on the site we recommend you consider placing a minimum 1 foot thick drained sand subbase below the aggregate base course in the new pavement areas. We recommend using sand with less than 12% passing the #200 sieve, such as Mn/DOT 31492B2. If the sand subbase is used we recommend the subbase extend beneath the curbs and to 2 feet beyond the outside edges of the curbs for frost and drainage uniformity. Sand layers outside the curbs should be capped with slow draining soil to reduce surface water infiltration. If a sand subbase is used in the pavement areas, drainpipes (finger drains) should be installed to remove infiltrating water. The finger drains should be connected to the catch basins. The slope of the bottom of the subcut should be such that water is directed to the drainage areas. The subcut bottom should not include depressions that can act as reservoirs for water collection R -Value testing was beyond the scope of this project. The soil borings encountered predominantly sandy lean clay soil corresponding to the ASTM classification CL. Sandy lean day soils typically have R -Values ranging from 6 to 20. It is our opinion that an R - Value of 10 can be used for pavement design. We recommend aggregate base meeting MN/DOT specification 3138 for Class 5 aggregate base. We recommend the aggregate base be compacted to 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor dry density. We recommend that the bituminous wear and base courses meet the requirement of MN/DOT specification 2360. We recommend the bituminous pavements be compacted to at least 92% of the maximum theoretical density. We recommend specifying concrete that has a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 3,900 psi. We recommend specifying 5 to 8 percent entrained air for exposed concrete to provide resistance to freeze -thaw deterioration We recommend slump, air content and compressive strength test of Portland cement concrete. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation The borings indicated that at the anticipated excavation depths the soils in the sidewalls of the excavations will be primarily Type B soil under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. Temporary excavations should be constructed at a minimum of 1 foot horizontal to every 1 foot vertical within excavations. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. If site constraints do not allow the construction of slopes with these dimensions then temporary shoring may be required. 5.2 Observations A geotechnical engineer should observe the excavation subgrade to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered in the borings and adequate to support the proposed construction. 5.3 Backfill and Fills Site soils that will be excavated and reused as backfill and fill appear to be above their assumed optimum moisture content We anticipate it will be necessary to moisture condition (dry) these soils to achieve the recommended compaction We recommend that fill and backfill be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 to 12 inches, depending on the size of the compactor and materials used. 5.4 Testing We recommend density tests of backfill and fills placed for the new house pad. Samples of the proposed materials should be submitted to our laboratory prior to placement for evaluation of their suitability and to determine their optimum moisture content and maximum dry density (Standard Proctor). 55 Winter Construction If site grading and construction is anticipated to proceed during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading and placement of fill. No fill should be placed on frozen soil and no frozen soil should be used as fill or backfill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM and/or ACI. Concrete should not be placed on frozen soil. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is obtained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below the footings. ,. ; 41re-1 4-PITRIM, 6.1 Soil Classification ' The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure)". Soil terminology notes are included in the Appendix. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review of the field classification by a soils engineer. Samples will be retained for a period of 30 days. 6.2 Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottom of the borings, the holes were checked for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after removing the augers from the borehole the holes were once again checked and the depth to water and cave-in depths were noted. 1 7.0 GENERAL 7.1 Subsurface Variations The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained t from a limited number of soil borings. Variations can occur between and away from the borings, the nature of which may not become apparent until additional exploration work is completed or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in ' this report should be made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program during construction. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered ' during construction to the soil borings and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. 7.2 Review of Design This report is based on the design of the proposed structure as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the design and specifications. With the review we will evaluate ' whether any changes have affected the validity of the recommendations and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations t We made water level measurements in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. The data was interpreted in the text of this report The period 1 1 t of observation was relatively short and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. 7.4 Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of Ixnnar Corporation and their design team to use to design the proposed structure and prepare construction documents. In the absence of ' our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analysis and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. 7.5 Level of Care ' Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC has used the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar circumstance by members of the profession currently practicing in this locality. No warranty expressed or implied is made. 1 L 1 F12J:QIII XN Boring Location Sketch - Juerissen Parcel Soil Boring Log TH-01 thru to Th -10 Descriptive Terminology 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y F 1 I 1 1 1 BORING NUMBER 11-1-01 _ GD Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 ` Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, Minnesota DATE STARTED 1128/12 COMPLETED 11/28/12 GROUND ELEVATION 906.2 ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT PND OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 8 feet p� 0 U Q- =O O O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION W > ¢ FW � 2 a� < Z o > M� > O O� W 09 3H0 O j Q MO> O z W a w Y" a r 5 t^ z a O" o ♦ SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PL MC LL • 20 40 60 80 nr FINES CONTENT (%) El 20 40 60 80 —. Clay, with roots, sightly organic, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) AU 1 (CL) Lean Clay, Nuwn, moist, very stiff. (Glacial Tip) SS 7-8-11 2 (19) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey with rust 5 stains, moist, rather stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) 8-8-8 f3S (16) 21/2 I CS ( -6 5$-8 10 I SS 5 3.5{ (11) � 3A LS6S 5-7-9 (16) 15 I SS 7 4-57 (12) A Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet I 1 1 1 1 1 BORING NUMBER TH-02 A- GO Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 Mapk: Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lenner Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12.998 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11/28/12 GROUND ELEVATION 914.1 ft (MSL) HOLE S12E 3 114 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Spit Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not EncouRerad at the Cave -int Depth of 12 feet w 0 0 Mo 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION we °' W I a = vQi z j O 0 w O j Co 0 > 0? z w w W Y - 0 0 Z -- o ♦ SPT N VALUE ♦ 20 40 60 80 PL LL 20 40 60 80 FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 20 40 60 BO — Lean Clay with Sand, with roots, slightly organic, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) AU 8 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey with rust stains, most, very stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) CST 7-9-12 (21) 41/2 5 4-6-7 CS, (13) 3 US, 3.5-8 (13) 10 IS 5.7-7 L12 (14) 3tl2 U13 (13) (13) 15 SS 14 8-7-8 (15) � Bolton of borehole at 16.0 feet 1 11 C 1 I 1 1 BORING NUMBER TH-03 Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 `A_GO Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lemar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side _ PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen Minnesota _ DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11/28112 GROUND ELEVATION 885ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 31/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stern Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRI W NG — Not Encourdered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Caveah Depth of 11 1/2 fe _ a= ov 0 O J O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a rY �w _r 2 a� w z Y r S j Q O� v or MG F D Q j Q m0> O? W o- w m y`" 0 3 z �" Q SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 M� 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (q) ❑ 20 40 60 80 — Lean Clay, slightly organic, with roots, black, moist. (Topsoil) AU 15 (CL) Silty Clay, dark brown, moist (Slopewash) IS 3-5-5 C16 (10) 5 3(7) USS 17 (7) (CL -ML) Silty Clay, slightly organic, bladc, moist tp wet (Buried Topsoil)LS, 2.4-5 (9) 10 4{r5 E19S19 (10) (CL) Lean Clay with Sand, trace Gravel, brown and grey, wet, medium. (Glacial Till) SS 3-" 20 (6) 15 SS 21 434 m i Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 [J 1 Li AIJ sft%fto HaugoGeoTechnicelServices, LLC BORING NUMBERTH-04 13570 Grove Drive, #278 PAGE 1 OF i ` Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation _ _ PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen Minnesota DATE STARTED 11128/12 COMPLETED 11128/12 GROUND ELEVATION 892.3 ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 3 114 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Holow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — NotEncountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 12 1/2 f ~ " Lu 0 U O r, MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Wr ot a � 2 > > Q O � w o: W W p j ¢ m p > Liz W w () a 5 Z A SPT N VALUE A 20 40 60 80 MC LL PL •� 20 40 BO 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 20 40 60 80 — Lean Clay with Sand, with roots, slightly organic, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) AU 22 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey, moist, rather stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) 57-8 L23 (15) I 5 31/2 'I A S3'4-5 124 (9) SS 25 3-55 (10) 10 SS 26 r3-7;-9 3 3 C27 8-8.7 (15) 15 SS 28 57-9 (16) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet L I 1 1 h 1 IJI 1 BORING NUMBER TH-05 GO Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 `A_ Maple Grove, Mimesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, Minnesota DATE STARTED 1128112 COMPLETED 11118/12 _ _ _ _ GROUND ELEVATION 893.4 It (MSL) HOLE SIZE 3 114 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING —Not Encamlered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 12 12 f do pv 0 L� Q O OJ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION �z ra O O� O D mOZ w q v' i �^ z '. }" It ♦ SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PL MC LL • I 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 20 40 60 80 Lean Clay wdh Sand, with roots, slightly organic, dark brown, moist (Topsoil) AU 50 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel to with Grovel, brown and grey with rust stains, moist, stiff to very stiff. (Glaclal Til) LSS 51 415 (15) 5 4 SS 52 5-7-10 (17) SS 8-9-11 53 (20) 10 SS 54 7-9-9 (18) 4 4 LS 717) (17) 15 SS 56 11- 171-11 4114 Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet 1 I 1 I 1 BORING NUMBER TH-06 Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 `A'GO Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Lberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11/28112 GROUND ELEVATION 886.7 ft (MSL) HOLESIZE 3 114Itches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRI W NG METHOD Holow Stem Auger and Spit Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encorntered at the Cav Depth of 12 feet = w p 0 v a 0 O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION wA w W a N z e 1u ^ > O O z w � j O j i MO O? z to W m x. pa z� —. Q SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PL M MC LL 20 40 60 80 p FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 20 40 60 80 Lean Clay, slightly organic, black, moist. (Topsoil) AU 64 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey with nut stains. moist, stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) 31/4 M Ss 65 4-5-9 (14) 5 3 SS 66 5{a8 (13) 23/4 LSS 67 517) (17) 10 Ss 68 5S9 (17) 3 7(20)41.1 LS 15 US70S 8-10.11 (21) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. I I 11 1 1 1 A. G O Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC BORING NUMBER TH-07 PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 _ Maple Grove, Mimesota 55311 CLIENT Lemar Comorabon _ PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, Minnesota DATE STARTED 11128/12 COMPLETED 11/28/12 GROUND ELEVATION 892.9 ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 31/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRI W NG — Not Encountered LOGGEDBY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Enco ntered NOTES AFTER DRILLING —Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 14 feet ~ p� 0 U O (9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION wa K W M an aZ ur e > > O OK W nt m w 0 j m0> UZ w w Y' O a r 5 3 7•• K o ♦ SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PL LL 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 20 40 60 80 — Sandy Clay, slightly organic, black, moist (Topsoil) AU (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey with rust 57 stains, moist, rather stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Ti) SS 4-0-5 58 (9) _..,. 5 21/4 _�..:.. F 4-" (10) L60 x(14) 10 US6 5.7-8 (16) 2 ♦ SS 62 4-7-8 (15) 15 SS 63 &8.10 (18) 21/2 =- - Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. t 1 1 1 1 1 0 f w c s x a x L C C 0 BORING NUMBER TH-08 AG❑ Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 %ft Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12.398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11/28/12 GROUND ELEVATION 873.9 ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 13 1/2 f arO w 0 v a 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w m w �Z w e y W0 > O O OOH n w Oz� o j¢ m0Z w a w» 1— a F 3 r^ z a �— of A SPT N VALUE A 20 40 60 80 PL MC LL M ; 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 20 40 60 80 — Silty Clay, slightly organic, black, moist. (Topsoil) AU 29 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey to 14 feet then dark grey, moist, medium to stiff. (Glacial Till) 2d-5 C30 (9) 5 2 LSS 31 2(7) (7) IS 2-2-4 L32 (6) 10 2 212 SS 3h34-633 (10) SS 5-6-8 34 (14) 15 U35 74" (16) 3 Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet I 11 11 1 11 1 1 1 BORING NUMBER TH-09 A- GO Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 13570 Grove Drive, #278 _ Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Side PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COMPLETED 11/28/12 GROUND ELEVATION 875.4 ft (MSL) HOLESIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Aupar and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encountered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING —Not Encountered at the Cave-in Depth of 13 feet = ~^ a s wov 0 O a 0 Q O 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION W r1 Ww�^ pr m a� M z e♦ a 0 O� C zD 3 z 0 0 m0> O? z w a r- c w r V" 00 z Y"' Q SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 PL MC LL -�1 20 40 60 80 ElFINES CONTENT (%) 0 20 40 60 80 —777 Silty Clay, slightly organic, with roots, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) AU 36 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and grey to 14 feet then dark grey, moist, rather stiff to stiff. (Glacial Til) F37 S75 (13) 4A 5 SS 45-6 38 (11) 21/2 C39 (12) (12) 10 1 SS 676 40 (13) 21/2 FSS 41 5-7-7 (14) 15 US42S 5-7-8 (15) 31/2 Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. 1 I 1 1 1 1 c 0 BORING NUMBER TI -i-10 GO Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC PAGE 1 OF 1 - 13570 Grove Drive, #278 ` Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 CLIENT Lennar Corporation PROJECT NAME Liberty at Creek Site PROJECT NUMBER 12-398 PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen Minnesota DATE STARTED 11/28/12 COLS -ETED 1128112 GROUND ELEVATION 869.3 ft (MSL) HOLE SIZE 31/4 itches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger and Split Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING — Not Encamtered LOGGED BY DAB CHECKED BY JLW AT END OF DRILLING — Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING — Not Emo ntered at the Cavan Depth Of 15 feet wo Z A SPT N VALUE A aof w w 20 40 60 80 rL 0-6 > Q p z 4 w� i Pl- LL wo` J MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Ce o� m0> Y" �" 20 40 60 80 u- =) O? p FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ O z w p w 0 r¢ 20 40 60 80 — Clay, slightly organic, with roots and fibers, black, moist (Topsoil) AU 43 SS 3-4-5 A 44 (9) — I 5 aI. *I SS 2-23 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, grey, wet, soft to rather soft. (Glacial Till) 45 (5) I 1 SS 1-1-2 46 (3) 10 1-2-2 M U47S (4) 3/4 11/4 SS 2-23 48 (5) 15 US49S 2-2-31114 (5) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. 1 1 t 1 1 Descriptive Terminology of Soil Standard D 2487 - 00 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes ,a.,..V .., (Unified Soil Classification System) a 14seemsemaaa:osssnBns a<..,rS�xn,4�w e Y rep w 0,, a-.aneo mepYa w aoAmrs. w pdr aoe wa appyt w YwYbrs v may w ¢op .:ane a asp. aaxaxa215><W apo-wx sad +.goename e CYDaaewPe.p •.2%bssnweas»'^spa GW-raN w�.yrasM 7sre rr� sa GYiGG rw!-waaw Taro w4^. ra. Gp-GC '-txp^r arapep gs+e yn to GP C ww+rCyep pY.�s4.0 ! Y isnt n Nru rasi sy ah ae ey. mw+ GC.v^r4 P 5,". SN JINV B Oso; 0"NuV [ 5%V aprwcfres xTwM lou n Y sour mvarn 2 t5Y V. spa ren Bests blot Marx . Ss+a6an_bliiwfapxrYgslyvyllrp-vt SSN .eagava sw^_vT+xa SW SC rnagaaap as•p urn ra. SPSAI snowt Taasp so.a rxr s.e SP er ,outs p,i xam rx+. car I YAnemerpi IC pit,n Nilo'00 sal.ti CI -Mt 6:ny'vey > as,m4axn 1cb25l FAa H^_:Si�«:n unS w'wsN'.4Ys"a' whc»aaPsmnaant. 1 YEw+�2wary b:Toinans m asptee+4ans23CW.Pbtbp 2waoxrmerTe+s=adtlwae•ay bgro4,ewvr n P124aM!IYwSwO A lone o PI<4w Pb:srzA I AIM P PiPasorep. a. H A Q Pl opts fl8gr A �•fY 60 Criteria for Asslgnmg Group symbols and Sues Classification Liquid Limit tLL) Group Names using Laboratory Test, x Grgp Medium Laboratory Tests 3;4' ID 3' I s;=I Group Name e Cha Cie" Genets C, 2 a am t S C, S 3 C GW Weeg•aoeO grave:: MC I More roan r+ w 50-v.. d S`". .x less Ties a C,< 4 6144or 1 > C'> 3, GP poerh graoee grave' b o coag lradgn PL Graves with Fin" Fees as ML or MH GM ce+" - ,o e m relaxed on c No 4 sere More It= 12°t Imes' Far" W uRy az CL or GFf GC C e rax `� Sands Clean Sands C. 2 e and l SC, S3. SW oaks -graded sand - _ = Z 50% W more o! coarse%r morefractofY Ya rel kss Imes ' C.< 6 smro 1 > C,>3- SP Poorly rat td sand' g noj passes Sands with Fuses F ,,es Classify as ML m MH SM &ty W 4slew live 12%, Frew as CL«CH SC Cs sand•' A Is Silts and Clays Inorgamc PI > 7 and pian on or ab,,, A' WYe1 CL Lean clay' _ FI < 4 m plots Debw'A lite+ FN. ' SA - .. aLqua hm,t a Was th5 organic Lquo lm - ven 01W < bis OLs Cngana Gay . -. . a - . L uq hmtl - not dewed OL m sn' -- e1 I Sins and Nays W orgaruc PI PtM on a abo -A- ane CH Fat clar PI plot below 'A• kine MH ErastK s.r,' - c `5 i Lqua unit # 50 or more Ok9a^a Liquid WrM -Duan dnea ON Orgam: 0 Lwd Wrla-rqt Bred < 075 e ON a ono: sa^ • - Highly OrganK Soils I Primarily organic rt®tlar. dark n color amt aganx o0or PT Peat a 14seemsemaaa:osssnBns a<..,rS�xn,4�w e Y rep w 0,, a-.aneo mepYa w aoAmrs. w pdr aoe wa appyt w YwYbrs v may w ¢op .:ane a asp. aaxaxa215><W apo-wx sad +.goename e CYDaaewPe.p •.2%bssnweas»'^spa GW-raN w�.yrasM 7sre rr� sa GYiGG rw!-waaw Taro w4^. ra. Gp-GC '-txp^r arapep gs+e yn to GP C ww+rCyep pY.�s4.0 ! Y isnt n Nru rasi sy ah ae ey. mw+ GC.v^r4 P 5,". SN JINV B Oso; 0"NuV [ 5%V aprwcfres xTwM lou n Y sour mvarn 2 t5Y V. spa ren Bests blot Marx . Ss+a6an_bliiwfapxrYgslyvyllrp-vt SSN .eagava sw^_vT+xa SW SC rnagaaap as•p urn ra. SPSAI snowt Taasp so.a rxr s.e SP er ,outs p,i xam rx+. car I YAnemerpi IC pit,n Nilo'00 sal.ti CI -Mt 6:ny'vey > as,m4axn 1cb25l FAa H^_:Si�«:n unS w'wsN'.4Ys"a' whc»aaPsmnaant. 1 YEw+�2wary b:Toinans m asptee+4ans23CW.Pbtbp 2waoxrmerTe+s=adtlwae•ay bgro4,ewvr n P124aM!IYwSwO A lone o PI<4w Pb:srzA I AIM P PiPasorep. a. H A Q Pl opts fl8gr A �•fY 60 19 10 t6 20 30 b so neo 70 90 log 110 BcubGs Duet 12 - Liquid Limit tLL) ' Gravel Medium Laboratory Tests 3;4' ID 3' I Dryderssty pa OC OrganKCGntent t Very sur IND VM density pd fi Pe'cem of saturahon 5. No 10 b No 40 MC Natural modouae contem. % SG Sw*Cgravay <No, 200, P!<4W LL Lrilw0 fond '` CCCOMsw, psi ' PL Poas6C lid y 0 Angle , mere; flip a pi PIash aly .� i qu U*C hredcompress+vesvergm. psi P200 % passnq 200 sere qP porAef P I,omeln srvength tsl NONE 19 10 t6 20 30 b so neo 70 90 log 110 Particle Size Identification BcubGs Duet 12 - Liquid Limit tLL) ' Gravel Medium Laboratory Tests 3;4' ID 3' DD Dryderssty pa OC OrganKCGntent t Very sur IND VM density pd fi Pe'cem of saturahon 5. No 10 b No 40 MC Natural modouae contem. % SG Sw*Cgravay <No, 200, P!<4W LL Lrilw0 fond '` CCCOMsw, psi ' PL Poas6C lid y 0 Angle , mere; flip a pi PIash aly .� i qu U*C hredcompress+vesvergm. psi P200 % passnq 200 sere qP porAef P I,omeln srvength tsl Particle Size Identification BcubGs Duet 12 - Cobbles 3to 12' Gravel Medium Coarse 3;4' ID 3' Fie No 4 to 34' Sart Very sur Coarse No 4 10 No 10 Medum No 10 b No 40 F+ne NO 4010 No 200 Sof <No, 200, P!<4W belov 'A' pre Clay < NO 200. Pt 2! 4 and V. or above'A' One Relative Density of Cohersionless Soils Vey loose 010 4 SFF Loose 5 to 10 BPF Medumde,," 11 1p 30 BPF Cense 31 to 50 SPF 'cry dense p 50 BPF Consistency of Cohesive Sas Very son 01,016p; Son 2 to 3 BPF Raster soft 4 to 5 BPF Medium 6 !o a BPF Rayter she 9 to 12 BPF Sff 13b 16 RPF Very sur 17 to 30 BPF Hard over 30 BPF Drilling Notes Standard peneVaW ren 00um9s were advanced try 1 14' Or 6 14' ID holt w stem tigers a cess noted oare Vole Jarring water was used to dean an auger plan to samo4rg only where mdeca'ied on rags Standard PeVrtrVah lest bonngl are designated by the prefix -ST' (Spm Tube) Ax sarrgres v e taken wit, the slandard 2' OD aplt-lube samper except vmere mkd Power auger bwngs we* advanced by A' or 6' d,a"WW Conbnaq S- %ghl SGIa-Stern augers SM ciass,faho rs and Shale depths "re n- fantW kpm tl5turpad 6dm-0IM augerad r:: the Eut1848 aM ere. 1118rerae Smrewna! aPprdxrmate Paxtr auger Sorrr)gs are desgneled or the p,ehx'B Hand auger b Ings wane advartced manually .•rah a 1 112" or 3 114- drameter auger aM were Wmlep b the deem from when the auger could bemdnualyvnlMmwn Hats auger torr+gs arc !MrAted Oy tna pra:u H BPF: Numbers oaaate blows per loot remded m ctandard penehalan test. alae 1,, w as -M value. The sampler was sed 6' Y+to un hra abed sort below h'a tglGw Eleni eager OrrvYlg reEiStaniRswere then counted 1m Secor+C and inYd 6' rnUerreenn eM ad0ed to ger BPF Where m" d•.eered sgn,,bcwvy they are reponed m the tnlbwmg bum 2112 for rte SQCMdah!�"s'n. ernihn respe=,"y M4: WH egY2les the 5arrmpler penehaleC SOS'sderv2+gm of Nn+mer and rods alone drne!g rox recurred WR: WR rd+ ares ce sampler penetrated 5oA under vrtgni M rods a=drc hammer wegm ora cnnrg rim recu+ltd TW radiates in, wa4ec :andls;vrOed! lube sample Nae. Au rests sere run m gercea! acrorbahta nip, app4cate ASTM s:aMards N � I EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, is made this day of July, 2013, by B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Grantor), for the benefit of the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"). The Grantor, in consideration of good and valuable consideration provided by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants the City a permanent easement ("Easement') for flowage and preservation and protection of wetlands, wetland buffer areas, steep slopes, woodlands and open spaces over, under, on and across the following land within the City of Chanhassen, County of Carver, State of Minnesota and legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" (the "Easement Property"). Grantor, its successors and assigns, hereby covenants and agrees as follows: 1. The following are prohibited within the Easement Property, except as permitted by this Agreement, unless the Grantor obtains the consent of the City or a release of this Easement or portion thereof by the City. A. Constructing, installing, or maintaining anything made by man, including but not limited to buildings, structures, walkways, fences, fireplaces, clothes line poles, playground equipment, roads or hardcover of any nature whatsoever, except: 1) feeders, bird houses, and other devices intended to foster wildlife; and 2) a 26 foot wide driveway to be used solely to access Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge Addition, from Pioneer trail, solely for agricultural purposes, which use must cease when Outlot C is no longer used for agricultural purposes or if an alternate access is provided to Outlot C. The driveway provided for in this section shall be maintained in its current condition and location, as provided in the depiction attached as Exhibit B. B. Cutting, mowing or removing shrubs or other vegetation, and cutting or removing trees, except for tree disease control by or as directed by a governmental agency and except by special permit for maintenance or as part of an approved vegetation management plan. Grantors may remove brush, buckthorn, diseased or dead trees of any size, and noxious weeds. C. Except for maintenance of the driveway area referenced in Paragraph IA hereinabove, excavation or filling or material alteration of grade, including changes to the size, depth or contour of the wetland; dredging, mining or removal of earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material. D. Free roaming of domestic animals (i.e., horses, sheep, chickens, etc.). E. The deposit of waste, yard waste, or debris. F. Activity detrimental to the screening of the neighboring properties. G. Application of fertilizers, whether natural or chemical. H. Application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. I. The application of herbicides, pesticides, and insecticides, except for noxious weed control by or as directed by a governmental agency. J. Outside storage of any kind. K. Activity detrimental to the preservation of the trees, slopes, scenic beauty, vegetation, and wildlife. 2. Grantor, its successors and assigns, fiather grants the City the affirmative right, but not the obligation to do the following on the easement premises: A. Subject to the driveway area referenced in Paragraph IA hereinabove, preserve, improve, and enhance the wetland, creek, buffer, trees, vegetation, and natural habitat by altering, clearing, and removing trees or other vegetation, by changing the contour of the land, by planting trees or other vegetation, and taking all appropriate actions to comply with federal, state, and local regulations related to wetlands, including the Bluff Creek Management Plan, the Bluff Creek TMDL and the Second General Surface Water Management Plan. B. Enter upon the easement premises at any time to enforce compliance with the terms of this instrument. Further, the City may enforce the terms of this Easement by any proceeding in law or in equity to restrain violation, to compel compliance, or to recover damages, including attorneys' fees and 171583v.2 costs of the enforcement actions. Grantor is not liable for the actions of any third party, other than its employees, agents or contractors, which may violate the terms of this Easement, unless Grantor, its employees, agents or contractors had actual knowledge of the violation and failed to take reasonable action to stop the violation. 3. Failure to enforce any provision of this Easement upon a violation of it cannot be deemed a waiver of the right to do so as to that or any subsequent violation. 4. Invalidation of any of the terms of this Easement will in no way affect any of the other terms, which will remain in full force and effect. 5. This Easement does not convey a right to the public use of the Easement Property nor does it convey any right of possession in the Easement Property to the public or the City. Access by the City to the Easement Property is limited to access necessary for purposes of inspection and enforcement as specified in paragraph 2 above. The City is not be entitled to share in any award or other compensation given in connection with a condemnation or negotiated acquisition of all or any part of the Easement Property by any authority having the power of eminent domain. The City hereby waives any right it may have to such an award or compensation. The City acknowledges that Grantor and its successors and assigns shall be entitled to develop Outlot A in accordance with the Final Plat thereof approved by the City. 6. Acceptance of this Easement by the City and the recording of this document constitutes the City's consent to be bound by its terms. 7. This Easement runs with the Easement Property and be binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns, and inures to the benefit of the City, its successors and assigns. 8. This Easement may be amended or released on whole or in part upon consent of the City. rn583v.2 3 9. The City acknowledges that the Grantor's conveyance of the herein contained Easement constitutes a gift to the City, and the City agrees to sign the "Donee Acknowledgement" portion of Internal Revenue Service Form 8283, as soon as such Form has been completed and assigned by a licensed appraiser. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this instrument on the date first written above. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 171583v.2 4 GRANTOR: B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of '2013, by , the of B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on its behalf. Notary Public 171583v.2 GRANTEE: CITY OF CHANHASSEN I� 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2013, by Thomas A. Furlong and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 171583v.2 Telephone: (65 1) 452-5000 AMP 171583v.2 Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded 171583v.2 EXHIBTT B Depiction of Agricultural Road 9 to Oudot C across Oudot 3 to Pionerr Trad LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED FUTURE wwwwwommmmum ----------------------- OUTLET=987.0 84.3 — x — .................................. a9 M O 0 060 0 0 0O0 0O001 0 n 0`n 0`n a 0 o�o�n 0 0 v1 DESCRIPTION SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FUTURE SANITARY SEWER HYDRANT GATE VALVE REDUCER EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN FUTURE WATERMAIN CATCH BASIN BEEHIVE STORM MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION CONTROL STRUCTURE EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER FUTURE STORM SEWER SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER B -STYLE CURB & GUTTER RIBBON CURB & GUTTER PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING 2' CONTOUR LINE EXISTING 10' CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR LINE POND OUTLET LINE POND HIGH WATER LINE PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DELINEATED WETLAND LINE FEMA FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY STANDARD EROSION CONTROL HEAVY-DUTY EROSION CONTROL TREE FENCE RETAINING WALL CONSERVATION AREA SIGN WETLAND BUFFER SIGN EX. CULVERT EX. OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES EX. UNDERGROUND TELEVISION LINE EX. UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE EX. UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE EX. UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE EX. UNDERGROUND GAS LINE EX. FENCE (BARBED WIRE) EX. FENCE (CHAIN LINK) EX. FENCE (WOOD) EX. CAST IRON MONUMENT EX. ELECTRIC BOX EX. FLAG POLE EX. NATURAL GAS METER EX. HAND HOLE EX. FOUND IRON PIPE EX. JUDICIAL LAND MARK EX. LIGHT POLE EX. PK NAIL EX. UTILITY POLE EX. LAWN SPRINKLER VALVE EX. LAWN SPRINKLER HEAD EX. SEMAPHORE EX. SERVICE EX. TELEPHONE BOX EX. TEST HOLE EX. TELEVISION BOX EX. WATER WELL EX. MONITORING WELL EX. MAILBOX EX. CONTROL POINT EX. SPIKE EX. SIGN EX. CLEANOUT EX. SIGNIFICANT TREE EX. TREE LINE EX. GRAVEL SURFACE EX. BITUMINOUS SURFACE EX. CONCRETE SURFACE SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL GRAVEL CONST. ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STREET LIGHT PI'$NEERengineering CIVR.ENGINFERS LAND NNF.RS L MSllR YOBS LANOSCAPEARCHIT M 2422 Enterprise Drive (6 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fa(651) x:x:681-9488 S www.pioneereng.com 0 2013 Pioneer Engineering JEURISSEN PARCEL TIT7 T7 T TA ArTX T A TIN T TIT A T TIT A X T 0 e m ►1 LOCATION MAP 0 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET INDEX 1. COVER SHEET 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT 4.S ITE PLAN 5. PRLMINARY BUIILDING PLAN 6-8. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 9. GRADING DETAILS 10. EROSION CONTROL PLAN 11. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 12-13. PRELIM. SANITARY SEWER & WATER 14-15. PRELIM. STORM SEWER Tl -T2. TREE PLAN / Ll. LANDSCAPE PLAN / PRINTED MAY 1 1 2013 PIONEER ENG*JEERM P.A. GITY OP CHANHASSEN RECFIVEO MAY 17 2013 C+i"ASKN PLANNING DEPT 00 -ENG -112289 -SHEET -COV R Ply 0 • o > 6 D wwwwwommmmum ----------------------- OUTLET=987.0 84.3 — x — .................................. a9 M O 0 060 0 0 0O0 0O001 0 n 0`n 0`n a 0 o�o�n 0 0 v1 DESCRIPTION SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FUTURE SANITARY SEWER HYDRANT GATE VALVE REDUCER EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN FUTURE WATERMAIN CATCH BASIN BEEHIVE STORM MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION CONTROL STRUCTURE EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER FUTURE STORM SEWER SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER B -STYLE CURB & GUTTER RIBBON CURB & GUTTER PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING 2' CONTOUR LINE EXISTING 10' CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR LINE POND OUTLET LINE POND HIGH WATER LINE PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DELINEATED WETLAND LINE FEMA FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY STANDARD EROSION CONTROL HEAVY-DUTY EROSION CONTROL TREE FENCE RETAINING WALL CONSERVATION AREA SIGN WETLAND BUFFER SIGN EX. CULVERT EX. OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES EX. UNDERGROUND TELEVISION LINE EX. UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE EX. UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE EX. UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE EX. UNDERGROUND GAS LINE EX. FENCE (BARBED WIRE) EX. FENCE (CHAIN LINK) EX. FENCE (WOOD) EX. CAST IRON MONUMENT EX. ELECTRIC BOX EX. FLAG POLE EX. NATURAL GAS METER EX. HAND HOLE EX. FOUND IRON PIPE EX. JUDICIAL LAND MARK EX. LIGHT POLE EX. PK NAIL EX. UTILITY POLE EX. LAWN SPRINKLER VALVE EX. LAWN SPRINKLER HEAD EX. SEMAPHORE EX. SERVICE EX. TELEPHONE BOX EX. TEST HOLE EX. TELEVISION BOX EX. WATER WELL EX. MONITORING WELL EX. MAILBOX EX. CONTROL POINT EX. SPIKE EX. SIGN EX. CLEANOUT EX. SIGNIFICANT TREE EX. TREE LINE EX. GRAVEL SURFACE EX. BITUMINOUS SURFACE EX. CONCRETE SURFACE SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL GRAVEL CONST. ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STREET LIGHT PI'$NEERengineering CIVR.ENGINFERS LAND NNF.RS L MSllR YOBS LANOSCAPEARCHIT M 2422 Enterprise Drive (6 681-1914 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fa(651) x:x:681-9488 S www.pioneereng.com 0 2013 Pioneer Engineering JEURISSEN PARCEL TIT7 T7 T TA ArTX T A TIN T TIT A T TIT A X T 0 e m ►1 LOCATION MAP 0 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET INDEX 1. COVER SHEET 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT 4.S ITE PLAN 5. PRLMINARY BUIILDING PLAN 6-8. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 9. GRADING DETAILS 10. EROSION CONTROL PLAN 11. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 12-13. PRELIM. SANITARY SEWER & WATER 14-15. PRELIM. STORM SEWER Tl -T2. TREE PLAN / Ll. LANDSCAPE PLAN / PRINTED MAY 1 1 2013 PIONEER ENG*JEERM P.A. GITY OP CHANHASSEN RECFIVEO MAY 17 2013 C+i"ASKN PLANNING DEPT 00 -ENG -112289 -SHEET -COV R �ITY OF CHANHASSEN P 0 BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 07/08/2013 10:42 AM Receipt No. 00224234 CLERK: bethanya PAYEE: Lennar Family of Builders MN Division 16305 36th Ave N, Ste 600 Plymouth MN 55446-4270 Planning Case 2013-13 ------------------------------------------------------- GIS List 81.00 Total Cash Check 00434783 Change 81.00 0.00 81.00 0.00 SCANNED 15--13 031385& Lennar Family of Builders JPMorgan Chase Bank NA. STUB CHECK NO. 434783 900000.1010.114 1 of I DATE 07/01/13 lNPOfCE CO.M NUMBER D1 TE PAYMENTADY/CE GROSS DISCOUNT NET 17600 2013068100 060613 JEURISSAN CHANHASSEN PRE $81.00 $0.00 $81.00 SCAN ED 1874551 City O n 7700 Market N;uleard POW 147 ('1....6..x... L.M CC] 11J1 d9 $81.00 $0.00 $81.00 To: Joe Jablonski Lennar 16305 36" Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55446 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 RE: Camden Ridge Planning Case 2013-13 Invoice SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM June 6, 2013 upon receipt NOTE: This invoice is in accordance with the Development Review Application submitted to the City by the Addressee shown above (copy attached) and must be paid prior to the Public hearing scheduled for June 18. 2013. Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: Planning Case #2013-13. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! r; ;ANNEG CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2013-13 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Com- mission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 18, 2013, at 7:00 Chanhassen City Council Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development- i Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of approximately 36.2 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 10 outlets; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Property is located at 1500 Pioneer Trail. Applicant: Lennar, ll1 Owner: Bruce Jeurissen. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.cLchanhassen.mn.us/2013-13 or at City Hall during regular busi- ness hours. AR interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, AICD, Senior Planner Email: bgenerous@ci.chanhassen. mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 Villager o Thursday, hed in the hea Jun6,2013; No. 4814) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, m amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.. Y V q was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijkhnnopgrs vwxyz B Laurie A. Hartrnann Subscribed and sworn before me on thisVW day of 2013 N ry he RATE INFORMATION JYMME JEMNE7E BARK NTARY PL'BUC - M'NNESOTA WYC MISSIONEXPIuovir.8 Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch SCANNED JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION �N 3 W N 0 W _ a 03 W Z JN1 in N in W TI Ir- 3 rn I F1L_ i I \L_�L_I `\ /1 L L_VI \L_L_f n �IK �V �L' SW COR. OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 23 (CARVER CO. C.I.M.) -513. 130 NW COR. OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 26'x/ (CARVER CO. C.I.M.) N 13 N SOUTH LINE OF SEC 23, TWP 116, RGE 23 S88003'46"E , 3 00 F Lo 00 S>2,1 (n B 0g'f n w v �e s N14 X r3g2 ^ 0;q6 85. 0 \N * •^_ 574�4\ 23„ / OUTLOT C 467.04 N88�� 1004.18 OUTLOT A Jlb Zl t i' I 111 I 2A.64 11111 -, soul" OUTLOT B", f// / `WETLAND \ \\ `$oy1 tiR9blr �y � SCF \ \ DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER ALL OF OUTLOT 8 1 T IV�v Ci '19h � I Ivl -—N88003'46"W 1-1 \ F cFA //0 \D 366 ✓e� 1) [) n r - I 1634.23 \ N LINE OF SEC. 26 TWP. 116. RGE. 23 7 � N 1/4 COR. OF SEC. 26 i' (CARVER CO. C.I.M.) 1111` lg4'1g�� \`\ 56a2( m \ m 00 n\ nl \ / f0 3 w Z N OUTLOT C 467.04 N88�� 1004.18 OUTLOT A Jlb Zl t i' I 111 I 2A.64 11111 -, soul" OUTLOT B", f// / `WETLAND \ \\ `$oy1 tiR9blr �y � SCF \ \ DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER ALL OF OUTLOT 8 1 T IV�v Ci '19h � I Ivl -—N88003'46"W 1-1 \ F cFA //0 \D 366 ✓e� 1) [) n r - I 1634.23 \ N LINE OF SEC. 26 TWP. 116. RGE. 23 7 � N 1/4 COR. OF SEC. 26 i' (CARVER CO. C.I.M.) 340.33 807.37 / SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 26 / rJ, c � 100 50 0 100 SCALE IN FEET BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23, WHICH IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 88003'46" EAST. NO MONUMENT SYMBOL SHOWN AT ANY STATUTE — REQUIRED — LOCATION, INDICATES A PLAT MONUMENT THAT WILL BE SET AND WHICH SHALL BE IN PLACE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE FILING OF THE PLAT. SAID MONUMENTS SHALL BE 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENTS MARKED BY LICENSE NUMBER 19828. 0 DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT A DENOTES RESTRICTED RIGHT OF ACCESS. PIZNEERengineering CJV ENGLNF.ERS LA DELANNERS L DSMORS LANDSCAPE ARCFpT EC[S SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS 04 m \ m 00 n\ nl / 3 w Z N w o w � SECTION 26, TWP. 116, RGE. 23 !n LOCATION MAP O co 00 NO SCALE 0 Z_ Z O N N � W 0 0 340.33 807.37 / SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 26 / rJ, c � 100 50 0 100 SCALE IN FEET BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23, WHICH IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 88003'46" EAST. NO MONUMENT SYMBOL SHOWN AT ANY STATUTE — REQUIRED — LOCATION, INDICATES A PLAT MONUMENT THAT WILL BE SET AND WHICH SHALL BE IN PLACE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE FILING OF THE PLAT. SAID MONUMENTS SHALL BE 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENTS MARKED BY LICENSE NUMBER 19828. 0 DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT A DENOTES RESTRICTED RIGHT OF ACCESS. PIZNEERengineering CJV ENGLNF.ERS LA DELANNERS L DSMORS LANDSCAPE ARCFpT EC[S SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS JEURISSEN 1ST ADDITION AREA SKETCH OUTLOT D Iaat_=r AREA SUMMARY TOTAL OUTLOT AREA = 1,568,388 SF. (36.0052 AC.) TOTAL AREA = 1,568,388 SF. (36.0052 AC.) o scA IN FEE[ PIONEERene,ee,;ng PIONEEReneneering 2.22 Evapi¢pivn --l- L 16511681-1914 Menlou H<igM1n. 111 51,20 Fa3:681 "9188 wvv.Pmmvey,® I� • • 5 0 a NORTH OF BLUFF CREEK SITE DATA: TOTAL PLAT AREA: 23.810 ACRES ITEMIZED IMPERVIOUS AREAS: STREET. 2.724 ACRES SIDEWALK: 0.325 ACRES TRAIL: 0.226 ACRES LOTS: 5.019 ACRES ACRES 4 4®6 1 ° HOUSE DRIVEWAYS 1.4010 0.3229 ACRES ACRES Ma ° 7 436 1 s 1.6 1 9 --- - � - REMOVE FROM BLUFF I .r.. 1®fi 4 ' v _-_- - .---CREEK OVERLY DISTRICT 1 a 4®6 1 13 4� 1 H 436 ] 1 1 331 1 7 339 7 I 139H 3 " � z 4 -.-.�.--- -.�.- -. - -- ` �- �♦ s 1 � xl. �-. � �-_ -_. .�.- - ---. -- -- E1aiTA� 111;, .. - .-. .•.1 / - -_—. BASIN 30 39M PIONEEReneneering 2.22 Evapi¢pivn --l- L 16511681-1914 Menlou H<igM1n. 111 51,20 Fa3:681 "9188 wvv.Pmmvey,® I� • • 5 0 a NORTH OF BLUFF CREEK SITE DATA: TOTAL PLAT AREA: 23.810 ACRES ITEMIZED IMPERVIOUS AREAS: STREET. 2.724 ACRES SIDEWALK: 0.325 ACRES TRAIL: 0.226 ACRES LOTS: 5.019 ACRES ACRES 4 4®6 1 ° HOUSE DRIVEWAYS 1.4010 0.3229 ACRES ACRES Ma ° 7 436 1 s 1.6 1 9 --- - � - REMOVE FROM BLUFF I .r.. 1®fi 4 ' v _-_- - .---CREEK OVERLY DISTRICT 1 a 4®6 1 13 4� 1 H 436 ] 1 1 331 1 7 339 7 I 139H 3 " 39 z 4 -.-.�.--- -.�.- -. - -- -.�.-.�--- aHyl II �♦ s 1 7 39H 2 —, 3981 1 9 9 3 30 39M 3 n 331 3 v 339 2 13 J9. 3 1 3161 3 z 361 3 BASW 36 3 4 361 3 1 5 36 3 6 I v 7 331 3 8 3061 3 9 361 3 b 36 3 n 36 3 v 36 3 13 361 3 H 361 3 n 361 3 / 36 4 1 361 4 3 361 4 3 )6l 4 4 361 4 5 36 4 6 361 4 7 36 4 • 361 4 9 361 4 . 361 5 1 •.. s ` 436 5 3 - _ - - - - - �--y _ - BLUBT a2FFR 0 Y TN T 5 4.6 _ _d5 • owl ♦•r.a'-�.........4•••�♦•Y(TLOTC OUTLOT_B , \`1 ' II-_ - . .................... ....44w PIONEEReneneering 2.22 Evapi¢pivn --l- L 16511681-1914 Menlou H<igM1n. 111 51,20 Fa3:681 "9188 wvv.Pmmvey,® I� • • 5 0 a NORTH OF BLUFF CREEK SITE DATA: TOTAL PLAT AREA: 23.810 ACRES ITEMIZED IMPERVIOUS AREAS: STREET. 2.724 ACRES SIDEWALK: 0.325 ACRES TRAIL: 0.226 ACRES LOTS: 5.019 ACRES TOTAL SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA: 8.294 ACRES SITE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: 34.8% REQUESTED PUD REVISIONS: 20' SIDE YARD SETBACK TO R/W 7.5' SIDE YARD SETBACK (15' BUILDING TO BUILDING) REMOVE BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY FROM — -----------__. LOTS 1 & 2 BLOCK 1, OUTLOT B, & RIVER ROCK DRIVE SOUTH 7E AREA 3 • m SHORELAND CALCULATIONS / / Ii TOTAL SHORELAND AREA: 17.4197 ACRES • ITEMIZED IMPERVIOUS AREAS IN SHORELAND: Ull STREET: 0.8093 ACRES ' SIDEWALK: 0.0856 ACRES 1 TRAIL:- 0.4994 ACRES 4 4®6 1 ° HOUSE DRIVEWAYS 1.4010 0.3229 ACRES ACRES Ma ° TOTAL IMPERVIOUS IN SHORELAND: 3.1182 ACRES JI SHORELAND MPERVIOUS COVERAGE: 17.90% MIO WNIE10fM9lV1aK aNfilI6ETAiE 91000 Ull ALLOWA861MEM6U5 1 1 436 1 z 4®6 1 3 96 1 4 4®6 1 5 4®6 1 6 Ma 1 7 436 1 s 1.6 1 9 1.6 I ]0 1®fi 1 v 4.6 1 ]2 4®6 1 13 4� 1 H 436 ] 1 1 331 1 7 339 7 3 139H 2 4 39 z s 39p 3 6 39M 1 7 39H 2 8 3981 1 9 9 3 30 39M 3 n 331 3 v 339 2 13 J9. 3 1 3161 3 z 361 3 3 36 3 4 361 3 1 5 36 3 6 �1 3 7 331 3 8 3061 3 9 361 3 b 36 3 n 36 3 v 36 3 13 361 3 H 361 3 n 361 3 H 36 4 1 361 4 3 361 4 3 )6l 4 4 361 4 5 36 4 6 361 4 7 36 4 • 361 4 9 361 4 . 361 5 1 466 s z 436 5 3 4B6 5 4 486 5 5 4.6 00 66� GRAPHIC SCALE M nE \ EAS IN� _--_-- ` BAREN BASM PI 8NEERengineering � I t II.13I4Ims11 1] 1. I ^ I " I . I ♦1♦IIIIIYI/♦♦1�I �1 ♦1♦1♦♦� � X111♦♦♦111♦1♦�i♦♦ILIIIIfi♦111111111111 111♦1 i� 1♦IYI♦1♦� �. .I�♦1 �♦A. t•. r10i1i1♦Il�rt x1111 �111i1iti1O11♦Ii1110i1i11ti1000i1�1i10111!OC. -YIi1111♦IIIf� 111111.111111111'x1111 IIIc.♦1 1•�1♦11101111��_1-1♦111111♦♦111♦111♦t 11111111 �1�1�1�1�♦�I�I�I�I�Y�1�1� �f1�� � ��1�111�1� 1 1 1 1 11� It �1�1� � /♦♦ 1 1 1 1 1) r ♦ 11111 ♦ ♦ ♦ . - : •, � ♦ 1 � 1-.: I I Oi1♦Ii`i0 0. - • : � OOi1♦1♦Ii`d dJ.. ♦1111111ryY1;✓ ♦11111111111111." 1111111111 H 11111111..n�11111111 //11i. �1 f♦1111111111 1♦♦♦1♦11♦♦♦1♦♦♦♦♦♦♦111.11♦ ♦♦♦Y1 �1♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦111♦♦♦♦♦♦♦11111 �♦♦♦♦� 11v04� X1111♦♦♦♦♦♦11♦♦♦♦11111111 1♦1♦♦♦.♦110♦♦ •11♦1t1♦1.111♦♦.♦♦♦♦•1t1 11♦♦♦.♦♦♦t11� X11♦♦♦1♦♦♦14 �1♦1♦1♦1♦1♦1♦1♦111♦i1♦IIIII�r11 \1♦11 i�♦Y♦1♦1♦1♦1♦ � ♦1� 11♦♦♦e♦♦If 11111♦♦♦♦♦�.r .1 ♦11♦♦11111 ♦♦♦♦1♦♦♦♦♦♦111♦1111♦ ♦♦11♦1♦1♦♦/♦� ♦�1♦♦♦♦11111♦♦1 �� 11♦♦1♦♦1♦♦♦ It♦♦♦♦♦♦♦c♦♦11. ♦♦♦♦111♦♦♦1 ♦�♦♦♦1♦♦♦♦�♦ 1111♦♦11♦ ♦�♦♦♦1♦♦♦ 1♦1111♦♦111 1♦�I 1.-•)1♦1♦IIIIIi a 1'11♦♦♦ -***# 1 ♦1♦♦♦IG X11 ♦♦111 ♦11♦♦♦1♦1 ♦111 ♦11� 11� I� µ_6.602 ACRES DEVELOPED SITE ED6.602 ACRES OPEN SPACE 12 �EN 6.602 SHORELAND OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS TOTAL SHORELAND AREA: 17.88 ACRES TOTAL PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN SHORELAND: 6.602 ACRES TOTAL PROPOSED OPEN SPACE: 8.662 ACRES EXCESS OPEN SPACE DEDICATED FOR FUTURE USE 2.062 ACRES Page 1 of 1 Civil, Family & Probate Case Records Search Results Skip to Main Content Logout My Account Search Menu New Civil Search Refine Search Location All MNCIS Saes - C� ReGOW Count 13 Search By: Party Exact Name: on Party Search Mode: Name Last Name- ieurissen First Name: bruoe Case Status: All Sort By: Filed Date Case Number Style Filed/Location/Judicial TypelStatus J I CASE CREDIT CORP VS JEURISSEN,BRUCE 27 -CV -86-004743 JOHN DEERE CO VS JEURISSEN,BRUCE 10-05-88-023642 BRUCE JEURISSEN, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF RHONDA JEURISSEN, A MINOR VS VANDALS, INC., A MINNESOTA CORP. 70-1989-09683 JEURISSEN, BRUCE -vs- BERGS, JIM 10 -CX -94-000494 10-S3-94-000286 10-00007306 72-C1-02-000206 10 -CV -05-277 10 -CV -06-1319 72 -CV -07-176 72 -CV -11-4 72 -CV -12-38 03/0411986 - Hennepin Civil Minenko, Eugene 03/19/1986 - Hennepin Civil Lebedoff, Jonathan G. 02103/1988 Carver 09/15/1989 Scott FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF ST CLOUD, ACA VS 04101/1994 BRUCE E. JEURISSEN AND MARSHA M. Carver PEARSON BRUCE JEURISSEN vs. CARVER COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE PROBATE DOCUMENT RELATED TO JEURISSEN, BRUCE THE ESTATE OF JAMES FRANCIS FLYNN vs. BRUCE JEURISSEN State of Minnesota VS. William H Boecker, Sandra K Boecker, City of Chaska, County of Carver, Prime College Painters Inc, Klingelhutz Development Company, John Klingelhutz, Durene D Klingelhutz, Klingelhutz Construction Company, Security Bank of Waconia, City of Chanhassen, Bradley S Moe, Heidi R Moe, Mary Patricia Hesse, also known as Mary P Hesse, Harold P Hesse, Timothy Silvers, Lois Silvers, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, and to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc, Troy F Evenson, Jennifer A Everson, Washington Mutual Bank FA, Peterson-Jaoques Farm Land Company LLC, Voyager Bank, Ham Rinta, Mom's Landscaping and Design LLC, Brian J O'Donnell, Michelle R O'Donnell, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Prime Mortgage Corporation, US Bank National Association ND, Arthur B Johnson, MaryAnn P Johnson, AgriBank FCB, successor in interest to The Federal Land Bank of St Paul, and to Production Credit Association, Jeffrey A Fox, also known as Jeffrey Alan Fox and as Jeffrey Fox, and Tem Lynn Fox, also known as Tem L Fox and as Tem Fox, individually, and as trustees of the Fox trust, Bruce E Jeurissen, Bremer Bank, National Association, Klingelhutz Companies Inc, John Klingelhutz, also known as John D Klingelhutz, Martin Pettit, also all other persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, interest or lien in the real estate described in the petition herein. Bruce Jeurissen, Nancy Jeurissen vs Town & Country Homes Inc, Hovstone Properties Minnesota LLC, K Hovnanian T & C Homes at Minnesota LC, NDI Minnesota LLC, Stewart Title Company of Minnesota Inc Minnesota Pipe Line Company, LLC, by its Board of Managers vs. Jerome F. Flaherty, Of at Bruce Jeudssen vs Robert Whitehead, an individual, and A-1 Heating and Air aka Bob's A-1 Heating and Air aka Robert Whitehead dba Bob's A-1 Heating and Air. Inc. 052711994 Carver 0321/1996 Carver 08202002 Sibley 03222005 Carver 12/18/2006 Carver Eide, Kevin W. 06/272007 Sibley 011072011 Sibley Great River Energy, et at vs Jerome E. Stadtherr, et 02/0712012 al Sibley Replevin Closed Replevin Closed Personal Injury Converted Closed Civil OtherlMisc. Closed Contract Converted Closed Conciliation Converted Closed Probate Document Safekeeping Civil Other/Misc. Converted Closed Condemnation Closed Contract Closed Condemnation Closed Mechanics Lien Closed Condemnation Open http://pa.courts.state.mn.us/Search.aspx?ID=200&NodeII=l74e/b2cl51%2c160%2c131%2c132%... 7/12/2013 UGD L.,LA• NMNMDLgGM DaKR.Dw c • • 4wlu. Ywxa[ [Y. 4PiKwl — I„WYl" [Y NR[ LN �EIEIEE 6w1W1 9lMR q.KL LAN.a 0 N N M G/.R vNM R R REwaR v`giaarR [ Z[�C I[KBNXILL LLL, .Miw Y.ntx O • • xu[ P • a. [D . w Acnw • • [wA • p`BAa�W[ E REET Lw., TqY YMR emM KMR WxLME 9uW[ oqe • w,rtR <Wc [DW LM 10' C. LIM aovoC xD I I uM --- .1 RgO40 ID' CwpIR LN - Ra• wnEL LwL E�CNENc. oL r • r LLffLft - - - - - - 0[LM.RD MrtiwO L.EwL — Id.IIpML.m BD.mDM. p �R L 09M IM ALL I[ Lw M[E.fEIM1WD•[N Wry MKP[t[RM A. OKRM.D ILL' 11 LxEB — q. WIXRPWnD L[t[WwE LW[ LY. WIXRgDImD MR q,K LM LY. WL(RwdwD tt[[AK Ux[ ..--• n IEEE leu•io wuj [ .— [Y. rfxc[ Iwwx LNO —. r [Y. ttxa IMmI • [Y. uLL iMx xtwlY[x, EEL ew '[. E p[ LW4 4L MRR M[ IAl s (� 1x EE YyK x[w TEII .1 Y ��TPEE Ll MLl 4 [ ...Oxi NK[ e' 9q 4 p[ww, © [Y. 4PiKwl — I„WYl" [Y NR[ LN O1. q.KL LAN.a 0 ;LL MD[ .a 0 v`giaarR Z[�C I[KBNXILL L,. [NAYLL[ g0[iW PoXL[a eL/IMLL - E REET Lw., MR PRINTED MAY I 1 2013 PIONEER ENGMERM P.A. JEURISSEN PARCEL PRELIMINARY PLAT PLANS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 17 2013 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT ICY IMA'IbNN.V SHEETINDEX 1. COVER SHEET 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT 4. SITE PLAN 5. PRLMINARY BUIILDING PLAN 6-8. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 9. GRADING DETAILS 10. EROSION CONTROL PLAN 11. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 12-13. PRELIM. SANITARY SEWER & V 14-15. PRELIM. STORM SEWER TREEPLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN SCANNED rY i Ti f �a'i0 :A Y _ uYYsf C[` a� n C {vI ��Cerl\ � Q •M.b+-'J.T O� 4 YI � i�i oil 9,%pa r( -e �a(J o 10 Nxd• 9f = T of {{af: u = F a%*tr X104 (r 'ty 1 w ISO t 8 . Y rY J�A yY~.t� n Y ¢4P I 41OV f� Ti f �a'i0 :A Y _ uYYsf C[` a� n C {vI ��Cerl\ � Q •M.b+-'J.T O� 4 YI � i�i oil 9,%pa r( -e �a(J o 10 Nxd• 9f = T u = F a%*tr X104 (r 'ty 1 . Y _1 may' _• ^� = 2� � Y� \ YI 6 ova 3§z f NIS _ R8L,ff- Y —� --•_ fl[ n �� iOCI 11l -IYl PP a i.: :� q Y Oi• / .,:_ . I _ is n I W� M! j� I P.{zi a W Z Q m z� N s n uU o p<..• C S Op 60\ K < Sa$S }} NW� y WP w n G WJ NI�y 6 W< W2N g 3RW � O F✓.W FO FS W w p6 C V �pXz Z6W J = z y C� 0W �FZ NCO 3 C «W f_ W< <6z N U> Z,YI„ > }<y'IjJ O$ 2 ynjW V 6 p { <N Pr o 2 Rag �--W x =W> >a7gx NN �aor y -N - "- Wo snRBm!f]11]1 m O NNZ ZNfP<VYO Zp^r6<VO OPj z >7 !i Y£ o u VN=p 'o <ow 'a'r W�pnw0 iZX K��F� p FpOp<F<}NNZ ¢r36 W pO0�06� OF !h O O )!P - �OOO iwnbt I000LL wOK o2 €0 ¢P OOOn VN z a Wn W rc��.00, a nN$ 3i O1. W1. . a 4 il jk e � o ' 9 ti •./ .. wZi !° 1 0 W Z ,Q^ V/ $a: E I < J �i K_ 0 W S 6 Z Z cn m� /J - R Fes" � y f E I < J �i K_ 0 W 1 6 Z Z cn m� /J - R E I < J �i K_ 1 /J - R E I < J �i K_ /J - R jig @ i€@ @€ f �IP I pp 53hp Fa €j°6E[- Alf - '�y�g iie.� iaf4 aSttF S p@x a ��` "f Ygnya�a3 @sf�e ;' s fav ftSi?s a . ' @ � �F�gg(( Y- qpa `¢ tx3_ g 3 pR p'p -i�64 �gp pp: If %Sa8 � 3S� F� g6� �9 �t ee gESa$ yFiiL4. �@apL%o$e6afiYei'4aiaa_4yaaj� ppf22i'ad@@EFppA.i��,$ Ea da%@gf e @9 •anF@@i �cEE9nfi�gsfpCpF €SFj.Yfn4: �$c�S€� p'9f3ea4 ';xYy€a�S$€4 .%$$�°�'4eY€Fa.cx€,afi 3'"F @ 7 `3�eB�i �:i%ES�� 3a@e9� } a![ai€a € @`° qg$y If a ..g@@aFa Yi p11€ t%e f? $ L to €.Y@pPIF€iE 11i € €?@e €l °S9 1 1 '38 gaa:iYl f1..Ifi9 i 1II1 i@ N. . @-i -— — __i s 1 16 ;1 A, aee;S.Y �e N €° f° It E )!tail! �'°•!s97Eyv $#iy3c_ 6s`g g r @p€ i1ig a: p -e ' 1 j9 a �€ x F @ gg%€ �, 4� $"@ fii�18$€ a S1 SE€ $ a iE YY 6 f �S§ €g €° € f g� I �' @a§F4a �¢ % p4ea woe �eFg� €a 3�S 7 c@a F i' �x.�€ice �B e ac$ FF a Ell, H.9 of °F[f � �€ & $ _ �� s� �f- ,fy $S Ee Ei %e @- % aufip�ge8 6 n "a€ a8 xie €@pp F•g@@g� = s �S 'a-€ q e Y fi=a Sfa@F@ a- gill, �S e i vrimr—' T -..__ 16 p p �q ,y g 94 a zFa € a �a7 °n EF§ %�F % e4 n . ga.. c2f3p i€s$°.e fj Se $f- _ @ v 45�. 4 a :$€ $- Y Y: v 8 f Fc gg g g ss 93. gn F aY9%c € ".i%p i a5 9 s in Ileo' §�e ! e@¢ geYs! aA�€c M i3 ! 4i`4 F 4 pg @$ � a Fill lig idgi-Illo ' � AY Bg S% S3 %E�@ge gg Egg �1.z[ 101�4i't =� � $e ,yo p - -- 4 :$ S€% aids €@sE€83� s: i@ Bg6 €%.i Ell 51 ss ss u4a Y Y � gg E ^ o i s Y ayga in o E'ag 3 c S e r e a - - ; ' ' e ' YA 1 >n.o, ala u y I y S 1 3 Q - J p •5 ys: Y m 3 S_ - ¢a 0 W z z U N w z U b i 'R Ila• i _ V 3Y 9! I -IFF' Ilii; "l�;t t e 1 G 1 1 !I t q. E6 i t S �W I— H 9 - �ttlljill.►'i1�' o q �No I�iV iiiiji r :a E yy 11• i I WIN EhUl [ !il;i'a r' 9 a 3 d £ R F gee' i [ d \gl sl r im it s Phi ill flat ii eFpt �, E1 [F _ Ei,t 9 Ilii z I P � M I }) t a z j in ii all 'et k Z;� R A F F I aE • i•GGG � 9 � FF�ii p� i iET. Y S� 1F ii all 'et E A F F I P a • i•GGG � 9 � FF�ii 93 iiii� ' i r � Sg e A t l,l I P a tlt 3 Hit, ilii t%t e A t l,l I �ti It} � P a • i•GGG � 9 � FF�ii 93 iiii� ' i tlt 3 Hit, ilii t%t e A t l,l I �ti It} � P a Fi! �!� i 1 e A l,l vF.1] q i W Z m \r ~a ss n MU y+ n � � o 0 i I n �g� § W9 i 4 y zh1 'Mi;t! Q as n � � o 0 i I r�� § W9 i 4 y zh1 'Mi;t! 0 d 3 a g#' �R9 ` g#' F ^R p III 6 z a E 0 !IPi rc y 6 a n 366 „` } • t !1 e 4Z,j 1ij.3`n{ -, 3; -i ( j a 3 i f°dl' °� j; jF' 3° 6 i { MCI! !I f: i 9f 91- Ix s x xP i Y P el r x ln:3x,P=lile�,i3 .1 .0 s, w i!Ru3P =EE a m'6w� w w ° zAll F �i THE Hilt W. it < i W a K K �T n N a � � IIIIIr q d Y L n a u � Q R W a K K �T C o' �i z= ZU z-. zss -Cf <siiFEiF EEFa E.FF€Emill Sal:. i... FIEaaat.a:.• <•3S.C€ iFf F .33i {I. $Si;iFf:1...••fd''.. SiE'fff Hl - S 9.. h.nP• p.np .. A!•��]�3] n]y9y•n.n.gp99Cn. n§.epA^3 •{A !p' -9 •"]•P Rj9AAA n ^S •n.A] ;�i F E3 E E�1 E SEES • p EE EEEE ES € S EL 9E FFHII EpEEE•: '•Y•Simil'im !EF I 3 !I I H H HH S o € I 3I## •# i III 1, I p#;Ills# lse'f###'#####'e:##;#'#;### #3##�3#`E < i S ii Ill €ii7f$ff fSS"iiiifiiiii'':,aff]i� liiii'�ii,ilfff � MID III 1 93 3 's 8 33335,33359.38957Ia1glgH 3igt: 3g.gg�:iE�lt;I7 e5333 3!999 399 d 1 r n Ha� �� if f e`a:iiaHf HHff fffff ff`ee==asap"saaa::::: E::.::: a�aaa€��� f •9•]99 9A39 •q.9e 935:e ]^A:e •]333.]••R�•• I �aO9:3.993.99.^.:...SA 9n 9 9 9. 4 FF 1 Ei pa •��[{g7��� EfffE$�E E•i f'i`�if f p[�� 66i � f• EEE `6iH# ���• p 'f.. l.. •I H H H H. H SIH S z FIHH HHi<s i! fit 11 _# !s€HHalf€f f i ff:EF7.f77E77€ii'iiifsff €fffiasiiliififiif'f:fffi7f7i 593':! ! S !!9 3 9"s3a_.335337�a=3.333' 99 93333:3337393 5j9,3l93'9,933 CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 05/20/2013 1:53 PM Receipt No. 00219836 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Lennar Family of Builders 16305 36th Ave S Ste 600 Plymouth MN 55446- Jeurissen Rezoning & Subdivision Planning Case 2013-13 ---------- ---------------------------------- Subdivision ($600+15*60) 1,500.00 Notification Sign 200.00 Rezoning to RLM 500.00 GIS Fee 20.00 Total Cash Check 00420123 Change 2,220.00 0.00 2,220.00 0.00 SCANNED .t CAMDEN RIDGE - PLANNING CASE 2013-13 $750.00 Rezoning to PUD -R $1,500.00 Subdivision ($600+15'60) $425.00 Conditional Use Permit $50.00 Recording Fee $200.00 Notification Sign $2,925.00 TOTAL $2,220.00 Less Check 420123 from Lennar Family of Builders $705.00 AMOUNT OWED SCANNED 38566 Lennar Family of Builders JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. STUB CHECK NO. 420123 r" 900000.1010.114 1 of I DATE 05/13/13 • INVOICE CO. p NUMBER DATE PAYMEMADV(CE GROSS DISCOUNT NET 17600 201305 222000 PM 050913 JEUISSEN CHANHASSEN APP PERMIT $2,220.00 $0.00 52,220.00 SCANNED City Of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard 1874551 PO Box 147 $2,220.00 $0.00 $2,220.00 Chanhassen MN 55317-0147 Generous, Bob From: David Hinners [David.Hinners@lennar.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 5:28 PM To: Generous, Bob Cc: joe.jablonski@lennar.com Subject: Camden Ridge- Primary Bluff Creek District Zone Attachments: 20140110171403442. pdf Hi Bob - Could you please help me understand the Primary Bluff Creek District Zone? I have attached a drawing of Camden Ridge showing the location of the Primary Bluff Creek District Zone. The future Bluff Creek Regional Trail will be installed upland from this line. 1. Will our customers be able to sod and irrigate to the edge of the trail, eventhough a portion of this area will technically be in trail easement? 2. Can our customers install a fence at their property line (for those lots where the trail is behind their property like Lots 7- 14, Block 1) or outside the trail easement (for those lots where the trail is in an easement on their property (like Lots 1-5, Block 5)? 3. Can our customers install a deck behind their homes, abiding by the 25' rear yard setback? Or is there a different setback from the trail? Thank you. LENNAR David Hinners Land Development Manager Lennar david hinners@lennar.com w .iennar com Office Phone: 952-249-3031 Mobile: 952-255-9624 16305 36th Ave. No., Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 e�nl Cs`F '._ on e \�« � - �s�.. W s c ^z� z M � �. _, 3 �a \�« � - �s�.. W s c ^z� z M � �. Generous, Bob From: David Hinners [David.Hinners@lennar.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 5:28 PM To: Generous, Bob Cc: joe.jablonski@lennar.com Subject: Camden Ridge- Primary Bluff Creek District Zone Attachments: 20140110171403442. pdf Hi Bob - Could you please help me understand the Primary Bluff Creek District Zone? I have attached a drawing of Camden Ridge showing the location of the Primary Bluff Creek District Zone. The future Bluff Creek Regional Trail will be installed upland from this line. 1. Will our customers be able to sod and irrigate to the edge of the trail, eventhough a portion of this area will technically be in trail easement? 2. Can our customers install a fence at their property line (for those lots where the trail is behind their property like Lots 7- 14, Block 1) or outside the trail easement (for those lots where the trail is in an easement on their property (like Lots 1-5, Block 5)? 3. Can our customers install a deck behind their homes, abiding by the 25' rear yard setback? Or is there a different setback from the trail? Thank you. LENNAR David Hinners Land Development Manager Lennar avi .hinners(o)4ennaccom v I nnar om Office Phone: 952-249-3031 Mobile: 952-255-9624 16305 36th Ave. No., Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 Generous, Bob From: David Hinners [David.Hinners@lennar.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 5:28 PM To: Generous, Bob Cc: joe.jablonski@lennar.com Subject: Camden Ridge- Primary Bluff Creek District Zone Attachments: 20140110171403442. pdf Hi Bob - Could you please help me understand the Primary Bluff Creek District Zone? I have attached a drawing of Camden Ridge showing the location of the Primary Bluff Creek District Zone. The future Bluff Creek Regional Trail will be installed upland from this line. 1. Will our customers be able to sod and irrigate to the edge of the trail, eventhough a portion of this area will technically be in trail easement? ser T H 2. Can our customers install a fence at their property line (for those lots where the trail is behind their property like Lots 7- 14, Block 1) or outside the trail easement (for those lots where the trail is in an easement on their property (like Lots 1-5, Block 5)? su 'r -H. 3. Can our customers install a deck behind their homes, abiding by the 25' rear yard setback? Or is there a different setback from the trail? Thank you. LA D �r David Hinners Land Development Manager Lennar david. hinners@lennar. com ~vIennar com Office Phone: 952-249-3031 Mobile: 952-255-9624 16305 36th Ave. No., Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 MY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.2271110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.2271110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Park and Recreation Commission FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director DATE: June 6, 2013 SUBJ: Park and Trail Conditions of Approval - CAMDEN RIDGE — Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of approximately 24 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 7 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Property is located at 1500 Pioneer Trail (see location map). Applicant: Lennar. Owner: Bruce Jeurissen PROPOSED MOTION "The Park and Recreation Commission recommends the City Council apply the following conditions of approval concerning parks and trails for Camden Ridge: 1. Full park dedication fees shall be collected per city ordinance in lieu of requiring parkland dedication; and 2. Construction of Bluff Creek Trail from its current southerly terminus, extending between the new homes and Bluff Creek to a terminus point at TH 212. The developer shall provide design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the "Bluff Creek Trail." All construction documents, including material costs, shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be 10 feet in width, surfaced with asphalt and constructed to meet all city specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for the cost of the aggregate base, asphalt surfacing, and storm water systems utilized to construct the trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials noted. Labor and installation, design, engineering and testing services are not reimbursable expenses." Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCA*IED Park & Recreation Commission June 6, 2013 Page 2 BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of approximately 36 acres into 32 single-family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and nine outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The site has a high point of 940 elevation located at the north property line. The site has a low point of 866 elevation adjacent to Bluff Creek, which separates the northern and southern halves of the property. The land south of Bluff Creek is located entirely within the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Corridor and is proposed as an area to be preserved as open space. To the north of the property is a wooded hill on the Fox parcel that is included in the Bluff Creek Primary Corridor, which is intended to be preserved. To the northeast is a ponding and wetland mitigation area for MnDOT and the Highway 212 project. To \1 the south is a future developable area that is guided for office use. The parcel to the south will gain access via Pioneer Trail. The property to the west is Pioneer Pass, a 94 -lot single-family subdivision. As part of that development, the Bluff Creek Corridor was preserved. The initial access to the site will be from the northwest. This roadway crosses two other parcels and, therefore, must be coordinated with the development of those sites. Final plat approval will be contingent on the developer resolving the access issue. As part of this development, we are also requiring that the developer establish a second means of access to the site. This access is shown as street c in the development plans. Staff recommends that this road be moved as far east as possible to limit its impact on the wooded hill to the north. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed development subject to the conditions of the staff report. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PARKS AND OPEN SPACE The quality and number of recreational facilities in a community directly contributes to its quality of life. For this reason, the City of Chanhassen places a strong emphasis on parks and open space. As the City of Chanhassen has developed and increased in population, more pressure and attention has been given to providing recreational opportunities for our residents. Increased leisure time, health awareness, greater mobility, and high disposable incomes have all contributed to the increased Park & Recreation Commission June 6, 2013 Page 3 demand for recreational activities. The challenge of the next century will be to provide facilities for a growing and diverse population. Parks can be defined as public areas that provide active or passive -oriented recreational facilities. A significant characteristic of parkland is its accessibility to its users. Open space is any parcel that is not used for buildings or other structures and is Ie8 in a natural state. Parks and open space perform diverse functions: meets physical and psychological needs, enhances and protects the resource base, enhances real estate values, and provides a positive impact on economic development. COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN The city's comprehensive park plan calls for a neighborhood park to be located within one-half mile of every residence in the city. The proposed Camden Ridge development is located within the park service area of Pioneer Pass Park. Construction of the 8.7 -acre Pioneer Pass Park site is currently underway and Phase 1 of development is expected to be complete in 2014. Pioneer Pau Park 1/2 Mile Service Area ,•F JJ COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN 2013 Pioneer Pass Park - Phase 1 Construction 53 Om Lind Hd PZP;eb Qaea &mgCmY I ` PM1aellrNuhz '•� YF�cl tiadFg ikorm 5twer Mpmwnentt YP ng Wt aexwd:m mart —. _€. YSphEall�9xeb1 Fetl- Yspae/v�mse Pda i Ymta YPAy Area — _ - YPtnesndm Yse.ane I 7. llantlsaa PSB ••e� One of the most anticipated trail extensions within the city is the north/south Bluff Creek Corridor Pedestrian Trail that extends from Lyman Boulevard south to Pioneer Trail. The proposed Camden Ridge development is poised to complete this extension. The proposed development will construct a trail starting at the current southern terminus of the Bluff Creek Trail and extending south — stopping at a location north of TH 212. In order to complete a link to Pioneer Trail, the city would like to work with the applicant and property owner to extend the Park & Recreation Commission June 6, 2013 Page 4 trail under the TH 212 bridge to a point connecting with the existing pedestrian trail along Pioneer Trail. ATTACHMENTS 1. Preliminary Plat Exhibits 2. Property Location Map 3. Park Service Area & Trail Map c: Lennar Homes Bruce Jeurissen LEGEND EXISRNG PROPOSED FURXS OESCMPTM • N --Ry MANII0-C EXISTING SANITARY SCWEl I'?O'OS_J SANT ANY 3_WJI FUTEM SANITAAi S=•Y-R HYUNAN >' N N GAIE VAL& F ► R=)I.CLR --- EIDSIWG WAIENMAIN PXV' -D *AT IAAIN - — WRW WATERMAIK CAICH NASN ® • BEEHIVE • • STORM MANHO F ► 1. FLARED END SECRW - • • CCRINX STR.ICRRF - - -- --- FXISMG SMRV S=1 --R PR0'05F3 NV SEWER "—�--f-- NTLRF SlNv SWFR --- - %RM:. NTARIF CUR-. d ML 13 -SME 0JR3 4 CUTTER RINN WRi k �Xjr-R t........... rMs -IN- EASEMCVT LC.= EXISRNG 2' CONTOUR LNd --- EKISTR.0 lO CCATWR JKE PRO -OS_) 2' C(XROJR JNE P30'Oi'_] IO' CCNTOJR INE PEND OJRLT LIN= ' — PCNU HGF WAI-N UNE ���• Yill'OS-) WO ELLVAI:T EMERGENCY OVER -L01' _ _ _ — _ — 13 -JN -A y W-ILAKU UN- • — • ELVA FLCCOY AM d N)AiY • • STANDAR] =ROSCN 0DIMOL EFA111111AE1A111111F111 HEAV"-L•JI--ROSCK CONROL TREE FENCE R=TANINC WAII C NSERVAION AREA SSKI w *F- LkxO 31.TE2 Sm FX. CL VERT —�' FX- CWRHFA] URI IW IINFS —�— FX JNDrhWWNC T- FV904 I WF —•—•—•--- FX. .JNX`R0IWXJNr, T= PHNF I KF • • - Ex. JNDERGRWNC r3CR W-- JN - EX. JNDFRGRWNC aFCTRIC INT ' EX JNDERMOUNC GAS LINE • EX INCE ;,BAR3 PARE) • • . . FX TNT (CHAN I. VK) e = o c EX- TNS ;WW)) (i CX CAS- IRO. VONLV-NT ■ LX -101dC NCX +3' EX. -LAG PS- • EX VAIJK.AL GAS 1.21-K • EX MNJ 1ULE • FX =(MING II RPF EX. JJDOA- LAV) VARK $ FX ICH POI- • EX � NAR FX, JTILIWY 17 • FX MM cPRIN<IFR VAIW V EX -AWN SPRM.<LER HEAD EX SE•JAP IME D FX. SFRMCS A EX ZISP ME BOX 0 EX TST IDLE j EX-ELLVSIO Sox EX MATER WLU. EX VWI IN VG W -L EX. VAIL30X ® 0 EX SINK- POINT EX WIN - EX 9GN 3 EX Ana - GL -E EX 9GNRCANT TREE EX. T --E UFS EX. GRAVEL SURFAC= E EX. 31 WN0JS SURFACE EX. ::OVC2E L SUNIA;2 SELET BAC<FL- �•.....�tl MAMA_ GRAN- CONST. rK-NANCF DEROSON COATRCL D_NVK-T STREET JCH- ng _PISNEER�► 1.12+ E.mIXVe LtiJrme unxan-.0 (651681.191h•M1 Pa 0X1 -vee M.�Mi.HdP.,MNALIID . +s.M1v�.+r•. Mi... JEURISSEN PARCEL TNTN TA T Tl► ,f Tl% T A T% t T TIT A T TNT A X T C'Y tocwnonxnr oo GRAPHIC SCAI.0 IN PELT SHEET INDEX 1. COVER SHEET 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT 4. SITE PLAN 5. PRLMINARY BUHLDING PLAN 6-8. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 9. GRADING DETAILS 10. EROSION CONTROL PLAN 11. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 12-13. PRELIM. SANITARY SEWER & WA' 14-15. PRELIM. STORM SEWER J 1-T2. TREE PLAN Ll. LANDSCAPE PLAN ad PMNEERvIgi 1 ng 9-.ava Hri/n,MN S91'M� P¢EBI-91N NORTH OF BLUFF CREEK SITE DATA: PROPOSED LOTS: 58 15 - 75' WIDE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 17 - 90 NIDE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 26 - TWIN HOMES EXISTING ZONING: A2 PROPOSED ZONING: RUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT STANDARDS AND SHORELAND OVERLAY AND BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY EXISTING LAND USE: MEDIUM DENSITY (4-8 UNITS/ACRE) RLM LOT MINIMUMS SINGLE FAMILY: LOT WIDTH: 50' LOT DEPTH: 110' LOT AREA: 9,000 SF FRONT SETBACK: 25' REAR SETBACK: 25' SIDE SETBACK: 5' GARAGE, 10' LIVING SPACE 35X IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE RLM LOT MINIMUMS TWIN HOMES: LOT WIDTH: 50' LOT DEPTH: 100' LOT AREA: 7,260/UNIT, (PROPOSED AVERAGE 7,999/UNIT) FRONT SETBACK: 25' REAR SETBACK: 30' SIDE SETBACK: 10' 40% IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE SHORELAND OVERLAY REQUIREMENT (RIVER/STREAM REQUIREMENTS): LOT WIDTH: 90' (SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 21-26) LOT AREA: UNDERLYING ZONING OTHER SETBACKS: FROM 212: 50' FROM BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT: 40' FROM WETLANDS: 40' PROPOSED LOT MINIMUMS SINGILE FAMILY: LOT WIDTH: 75' LOT DEPTH: 130' LOT AREA: 9,000 SF PER RLM REQUIREMENT 35X ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER SHORELAND DISCTRCT SEC 20-485 9 —CONSERVATION SIGN -STREET LIGHT >'a PRIMARY BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT SECONDARY BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT CHANHASSEN PARKLAND AND TRAILS/SIDEWALKS e Overpass # City Parkland & Preserves e Underpass dF Carver County Parkland T Trail Head * DNR Property ® City Hall F-,'� Bluff Creek Golf Course Public School r, ' I ISD 112 Existing Trail/Sidewalk ISD 276 Future Trail MN Landscape Arboretum o WQ I WO s'. ;000 CM 5Am e,. T.OW 8" RwoW1MW< MauW.ntA (WMA) S Ol WWW.Cl.CI7On{]USSBRT/7. US August/8,2009 ciauim�oi.wnenwuaor n.,�.w.w 13-13 CAMPBELL KNUTSON November 12, 2013 Mr. Bob Generous RECEIVED City of Chanhassen NOV 15 2013 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Jeurissen Ridge Dear Mr. Generous: Enclosed herewith for your files are the following original, recorded documents relating to the plat of Jeurissen Ridge: 1. Development Contract recorded with the Carver County Recorder on August 15, 2013, as Document No. A582551; 2. Grant of Permanent and Temporary Easements from Degler Land Company, LLC to the City for public roadway and utility purposes recorded on August 15, 2013, as Document No. A 582553; 3. Grant of Permanent and Temporary Easements from Chanhassen ✓ Residential Development Partners, LLC to the City for public roadway and utility purposes recorded on August 15, 2013, as Document No. A 582554; and 4. Easement for permanent flowage and preservation and protection of wetlands, recorded October 7, 2013, as Document No. A 585320. If you have any questions regarding the above, please give me a call. cjh Enclosure Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association M Legal Assistant SCANNED Document NO. OFFICE OF THE A 582551 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Receipt # RA 201300009439 Certified Recorded on August 15, 2013 4:30 PM Fee $48.00 512551 Mark Lundqren II III IIIIIII III I III County Recorder CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA JEURISSEN RIDGE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Cen�--�c-� ��z CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT JEURISSEN RIDGE AGREEMENT dated JULY 22, 2013 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and, B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for JEURISSEN Ridge (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the plat. 3. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plan: Final plat approved JULY 22, 2013, prepared by Pioneer Engineering. 4. Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC ATTN: BRUCE JEURISSEN 19450 281' STREET BELLE PLAINS, MN 56011-5010 Phone: 952-873-6020 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager; or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Telephone (952) 227-1100 5. Other Special Conditions. A. Dedicated access to Outlot A must be provided prior to recording the plat. B. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed except for access for agricultural purposes only on Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge. An access easement across Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge shall be recorded which shall follow the existing driveway alignment with a width of approximately 26 feet. Said easement shall be vacated should alternate access to Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge become available. C. Unless the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements assessment, City Project 06-05, levied against the property described on Exhibit "A" is paid in full before the plat is recorded the assessment is reapportioned against Outlot A. As of June 6, 2013, the assessment amount with accrued interest was $796,302.31. D. The Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone, Outlot "B", shall be conveyed to the City by warranty deed free and clear of any encumbrances or a preservation easement acceptable to the City shall be established over Outlot B before the plat is recorded. E. Before any development plans are submitted for Outlot C the property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Development of Outlot C Jeurissen Ridge would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternate Urban Area wide Review, AUAR. Any development would need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR. 2 (SEA) . STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: l Thomas ®A. Furlong, Mayor AND: odd Gerhardt, City Manager B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC BY: Bruce J66sKen, Its Chief Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -30 M day of 2013, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayer, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the C 690f hanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF' e,- ) KAREN J,ENGELHARDT Notary Public -Minnesota V (omm=i- EVWn Jan 31, 2015 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this d 1 2013, Bruce Jeurissen, Chief Manager of B. Elmer Family Minn to Limited Liability Company, on behalf of the company. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 N ARY P PATRICK J NEATON NI MRYPUBLIC•MINNESOTA pn Elkin Jrn:21, BBBi day of LLC, a EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota (referred to herein as Tract A). ALSO: Commencing at the Southwest comer of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Section Line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest comer of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest comer of said Section and place of beginning. Being a three-comered piece in Southwest comer of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, ALSO: Beginning at the Southeast comer of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, North of Range 23 West; thence south along the quarter -quarter section line a distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14; thence east along the north line of said Carver County Road No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the aforementioned quarter -quarter section 827 feet to a point 26 feet north of the east -west quarter -quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26, thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter -quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of beginning (referred to herein as Tract B). EXCEPT: that part of Tract A which lies Easterly of LINE 1 described below: LINE 1. Commencing at the north quarter comer of said Section 26; thence run west on an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section 1634.23 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 478.28 feet; thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. and EXCEPT that part of Tract B which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of LINE 2 described below: LINE 2. Commencing at the point of termination of Line 1 described above; thence run east on an azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 seconds along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds for 448.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 feet; thence on an azimuth of 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet; thence on an azimuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating. Together with right of access retained in Quit Claim Deed Document No. 310751 pursuant to Access Driveway Permit dated August 26, 2012. MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is go ed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this 31stdayof July 20 13. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF Carver ) Gary D. Brandenburg CITIZENS STATE BANK NORWOOD YOUNG AMERICA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this31 a t day of July 2013 by Gary Brandenburg , Sr Vice Pres i r1pnt- of ri -i Sate Bank Norwood Young America, on its behalf. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 KATHIffIt N KAUFRAAWt NOTARY %�l1CatMNE$pT[t M' COAAJISSIOG E)lWAE51/�t20i8 Document No. OFFICE OF THE A 582553 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Receipt # RA 201300009439 Certified Recorded on August 15, 2013 4:30 PM Fee: $48.00 582553 Mark Lun 1111111111111111111 County Rdecorder (resesved jor recording injormarion) GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS DEGLER LAND COMPANY, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the CITY OF CIIANHASSEN, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, the following easements: 1. A permanent easement for public roadway and utility purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on the attached Exhibit `B", including the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the permanent easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public roadway and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the permanent easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the permanent easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public roadway and utility easements. 9947977v3 1 2. A temporary construction easement over, across, on, under, and through the land situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on the attached Exhibit `B." To have and to hold the same, unto the City, its contractors, agents, servants and assigns, commencing upon execution of this document and expiring June 15, 2014, together with the right of ingress to and egress from the temporary easement premises, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining the property of the City, at the will of the City, its successors and assigns. Grantor hereby grants the uses herein specified without divesting itself of the right to use and enjoy the above described temporary easement premises, subject only to the right of the City to use the same for the purposes herein expressed. As a condition of said temporary construction easement grant, the City shall, upon completion of construction and prior to termination, restore the ground surface of the temporary construction easement premises to its original condition so far as is reasonably practicable with the exception of any grade changes, bank sloping, ditching, fills, slope construction, cuts and any removal of earth, other materials, trees and other vegetation. The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises; and that it will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 9947977v3 2 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this agreement this 7 A - day of IS>r� n� , 20 -Li. GRANTOR: DEGLER LAND COMPANY, LLC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7Y -t- day of a , 20_L3, by .� of A CC �i 1 ` , the Chief Manager of Degler Land Company, LLC,as Minnesota Im"ted liability company, on behalf of said company, Grantor. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporation Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651452-5000 RNK/cjh 9947977v3 NOTARY PUB�C KAREN KAY BERGSTROM Notary Public Minnesota Commission Expires !anuary 31, 2017 EXHIBIT "A" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS A permanent easement for public roadway and utility purposes over, under and across ... PROPOSED ROADWAY EASEMENT A 60.00 foot wide easement for roadway purposes lying over. under and across Cutlet B. THE PRESERVE AT BLUFF CREEK IST ADDITION, accordirg to fhe recorded plat thereof, Catver County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement Is desalbed us follows: Commencing of the southeast corner of said Outlet 8: thence on an assumed bearing of North 88 degrees 08 mirutes 10 seconds West, along the south lira at said Outlet B. a distance of 115.38 feet, to the point of beginning o' the centallne to be described; thence northerly, a distance of 8.60 feet, along a rontongentiol curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle a 01 degrees 38 mnates 31 seconds, a radius of 300.00 feet and a chord bearing of North 12 degrees C2 minutes 16 seconds West; thence Nath 11 degrees 13 minutes 00 seconds West, tangent to said curv, a distance of 35.09 feet; thmco northwesterly, a distorice of 257.58 'eel ulony a tuoyentiul curw;, concave to tfe southwust, having o radius of 300,00 feet and a central angle of 48 degrees f4 minutes 23 seconds; thence northwesterly. a distance of 133.34 feet, along a reverse curve, concave to the northeast. having o radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 77 minutes 57 seconds; therce North 33 degrees 59 minutes 27 socords West, tangent to said em ve, a distance of 76.69 feet, to the rorthwcsterly line of said Outlet B or there lemiinutng. The sidelines of said easement shall be prolonged or shortened to temp i ote on said south and northwesterly lines of Outlot B. PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT An 80.CO foot wide uasoment fa drainage and utility purposes lying over, undar and across Outlet B. THE PRESERVE AT BLUFF CREEK IST ADDITION. according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver Ccurty, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement is described as `allow¢'. Cammencing at the southeast corner of said Outlet B; thence on an assumed bearing of North 88 degrees OB minutes 10 seconds West, along the south line of said Outlot B. o distance of 115.38 feet, to the pant of beginning o` the centerline to be described; thence northerly, a distance of 8.60 feet. along a rontangentlal curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle of 01 degrees .58 mnjtes 31 seconds, a radius at 300.00 feet and o chord bearing of North 12 degrees 02 minutes 16 seconds West; thence Nath 11 degrees ;3 miruhre 00 seconds West, tangent to said curve a distance of 35.09 feet; hence northwesterly. a distance of 252.58 •eat, darg a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 48 degrees '4 minutes 73 seconds; tt,ence northwesterly, a disturce of 133.34 feet, along a reverse curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 27 minutes 57 seconds; thence North 33 degrees 59 minutes 27 secards West, tangent to said curve, a distance of '.6.69 feet, to the northwesterly line of said Outlet 8 and there terminating. The sidelines of said easement shall be prolonged ae shortened to terminate on said saath and northwesterly lines of Outlet 3 0 A temporary construction easement over, under and across ... PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A 200.00 foot wide temporary easement for construction purposes lying over. under and across Outlot B, THE PRESERVE AT BLUFF CREEK 1ST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Outlet 8; thence or, on assumed bearing of North 88 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds West, along the south line of said Outlot 8. a distance of 115.38 feet, to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence northerly, a distance of 8.60 feet, along a nontangentiol curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle of 01 degrees 38 minutes 31 seconds, a radius of 300.00 feet and a chord bearing of North 12 degrees C2 minutes 16 seconds West; thence North 11 degrees 13 minutes 00 seconds West, tmgert to said curve a distance of 35.09 feet; thence northwesterly. a distance of 252.58 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 48 degrees 14 minutes 23 seconds; thence northwesterly, a distance of 133.34 feet, along a reverse curve. concave to the northeast, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 27 minutes 57 seconds; thence North 33 degrees 59 minutes 27 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 76.69 feet, to the northwesterly fine of said Oudot 8 and there terminating. The sldelNnes of said easement shall be prolonged of shortened to terminate or said scarf, and northwesterly lines of Outlet B. THIS DOCUMENT WAS RECORDED IN AN ILLEGIBLE CONDITION 9947977v3 EXHIBIT "B" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS • THIS SKETCH DOES NOT PJRPORT TO SHOW THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENTS FROM OR ONTO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND, EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR ,. UNRECORDED EASEMENTS WHICH AFFECT SAID LAND OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID LANA. �i 120 60 0 120 n ` ybo _ GAF, r; Scole In Feet CF W+1t` \ \ SWTH LME d WA01 ��zb 1c I ^ .. Y CORNER OF OOTLCT 8 ' 9947977v3 5 Document NO. OFFICE OF THE A 582554 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Receipt # RA 201300009439 Certified Recorded on August 15, 2013 4:30 PM Fee: $48.00 582554 lilll Ilillll 1111111 Co n yURecorder (reserved for recording information/ GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS CHANHASSEN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, the following easements: 1. A permanent easement for public roadway and utility purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on the attached Exhibit "B", including the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the permanent easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public roadway and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the permanent easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the permanent easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public roadway and utility easements. 10008063v1 U 2. A temporary construction easement over, across, on, under, and through the land situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on the attached Exhibit `B." To have and to hold the same, unto the City, its contractors, agents, servants and assigns, commencing upon execution of this document and expiring June 15, 2014, together with the right of ingress to and egress from the temporary easement premises, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining the property of the City, at the will of the City, its successors and assigns. Grantor hereby grants the uses herein specified without divesting itself of the right to use and enjoy the above described temporary easement premises, subject only to the right of the City to use the same for the purposes herein expressed. As a condition of said temporary construction easement grant, the City shall, upon completion of construction and prior to termination, restore the ground surface of the temporary construction easement premises to its original condition so far as is reasonably practicable with the exception of any grade changes, bank sloping, ditching, fills, slope construction, cuts and any removal of earth, other materials, trees and other vegetation. The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises; and that it will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 10008063v1 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this agreement this day of August, 2013. GRANTOR: CHANHASSEN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC Its C Manag STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was aclypowledged before me this day of c% 20_6, by �D �l l�%+.tea- the Chief Manager of Chanh sen Residential Development Partners, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said company, Grantor. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNNSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporation Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651452-5000 RNK/cjh 10008063vl NOTARY PUBLIe OA'ik A15? KAREN KAY BERGSTROM Notary Public .�-- Minnesota commissbn Ex les Janua 31, 2017 EXMIT "A" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS A permanent easement for public roadway and utility purposes over, under and across ... PROPOSED ROADWAY EASEMENT A 60.00 toot wide easement for roadway purposes lyirg over, under and across Outlet B, THE PRESERVE AT BLUFF CREEK IST ADDITION, occordirg to -ha recorded plat thereat, Carver County. Minresoto TI e centerllne of said easement Is described us follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Outlet H; thence on an assumed bearing at North 88 degrees 06 mirutes 10 seconds West, along the loath line of said Outlet B, a distance of 115.38 feet. to the point of beginning o• the centerline to be described; thenen northerly, a distance of 8.60 feet, along a rontongential curve, concave to the northeast, havirg a central angle of 01 degrees 38 minutes 31 seconds, a radius of 300.00 feet and a chord bearing of North 12 degrees 02 minutes 16 seconds West; thence North 11 degrees 13 minutes 00 seconds West, tangent ;o said curer a distance at 35.09 feat; thence northwesterly. a distaice of 252.58 feet, along a tangential curve. concave to the southwest, having a radius of 300W feet and a central angle cr 48 degrees '4 minates 23 seconds: thence northwesterly. a distance of 133.34 feet, along a reverse curve. concave to the northeast, having a radius of 300.00 feet and o central angle of 25 degrees 27 minutes 57 seconds; thence North 33 degrees 59 minates 27 secerds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 76.69 feet, to the rorthwestorly line of said Outlot 8 and there terminating. The sidelines of sold easement shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate on sold south and northwesterly Imes of Outlet 9. PROPOSED DRAJKAGE AND U71UTY EASEMENT An 80.00 foot vide casement for drainage and aU1Hy purposes lying over, ander and across Outlrt 9, THE PRESERVE AT BLUFF CREEK IST ADDITION. occesdim to the recorded plot thereof, Carver Ccarty, Minnesota. The centerline of said eosemert 'rs described as follower Commencing at the southeast corner of said Outlot 0; thence on an assumed bearing of North 88 degrees OB mirutes 10 seconds West. along :he south line of said Outlet 0, a distance of 115.38 feet, to the point of beginning o` the centerline to be described; thence northerly, a distance of 8.60 teet. along a rortangentiol curve, concave to the northeast, havirg a central angle of 01 degrees 38 minutes 31 accords, a radius of 300.00 feet and a chord bearing of North 12 degrees 02 minutes 16 secands West; thence North 11 degrees 13 minutes 00 secords West, tangent to said curve a distance of 35.09 feet; thence northwesterly, a distance of 252.58 feet, along a tongential curve, coneave to the southwest, having a radius of 300.00 fear and a central angle of 48 degrees 44 minutes 23 seconds; thence northwesterly, a distarco of 133.34 feet, along a reverse curve, concave to the northeast. having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 27 minutes 57 seconds; therce North 33 degrees 59 minute=_ 27 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 76.69 feet, to the rerthwesterly line of said Outlet B and there tenninatng. The sidelines o1 said easement shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate an said soutF ord northwesterly lines of Outbt 3. AND A temporary construction easement over, under and across ... PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A 700.00. 'cot wide temporary easement for constructior purposes lying over. under and across Outlet B. THE PRESERVE AT BLJFF CREEK IST ADDITION, according to the recorded plot thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Cammercing at the southeast corner of said Oatlot B; thence or an assumed bearing of North 88 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds West, along the south lire of said Outlet B. a distance at 115.38 feet, to the point of beginning of the certerline to be described; thence northerly, a distance of 8.60 feet, along a rontangential curve, concave to the northeast, having o central angle of 01 degrees 38 minutes 31 seconds, a radius of 300.00 feet and o chord bearing o` North 12 degrees 02 minutes 16 seconds West; thence North 1' degrees 13 minutes DO seconds West, tangent to said curve a distance of 35.09 'eet; thence northwesterly, a distance of 252.58 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a radiuo of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 48 degrees 14 mirutes 23 seconds; thence northwesterly, a distance of 133.34 feet. alorg a reverse curve. concave to the northeast, havnq a radius of 300.00 feet and a centrd angle of 25 degrees 27 minutes 57 seconds; thence North 33 degrees 59 minutes 27 seconds West, tangent to sold curve, a distance of 76.69 feet, to the northwesterly line of said Outlet B and there terminating. The sidelines of said easement shall be prolonged or shortened to terminate or sold south and northwesterly lines of Outlet B. THIS DOCUMENT WAS RECORDED IN AN ILIL IMLE CONDITION 10008063vl 4 EXHIBIT "B" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS • THIS SKETCH DOES NOT PJRPORT TO SHOW THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENTS FROM OR ONTO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND, EASEMENTS OF RECORD CR / ap CNRECORDED EASEMENTS WHICH AFFECT SAID LAND OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID LAND. / / / 120 60 0 120 GAF, F, i_ Scale in Feel 100080630 5 \ $ 'T LNE a WnOT e P ^ ._ V SE CMl OF W'ILCT CARVER COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES DOCUMENT C(- -- Document No. OFFICE OF THE A 585320 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Receipt # RA 201300011292 Certified Recorded on October 07, 2013 3:08 PM DOCUMENT TITLE: DOCUMENT DATE: DOCUMENT NAMES: Fee: $46.00 585320 f I III ��IIIIII� III Lundgren County Recorder EASEMENT,1'' THIS INSTRUMENT, is made this 2.Z.+A day of ��` 2013, by B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Grantor"), for the benefit of the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"). The Grantor, in consideration of good and valuable consideration provided by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants the City a permanent easement ("Easement") for flowage and preservation and protection of wetlands, wetland buffer areas, steep slopes, woodlands and open spaces over, under, on and across the following land within the City of Chanhassen, County of Carver, State of Minnesota and legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" (the "Easement Property"). Grantor, its successors and assigns, hereby covenants and agrees as follows: The following are prohibited within the Easement Property, except as permitted by this Agreement, unless the Grantor obtains the consent of the City or a release of this Easement or portion thereof by the City. A. Constructing, installing, or maintaining anything made by man, including but not limited to buildings, structures, walkways, fences, fireplaces, clothes line poles, playground equipment, roads or hardcover of any nature whatsoever, except: 1) feeders, bird houses, and other devices intended to foster wildlife; and 2) a 26 foot wide driveway to be used solely to access Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge Addition, from Pioneer trail, solely for agricultural purposes, which use must cease when Outlot C is no longer used for agricultural purposes or if an alternate access is provided to Outlot C. The driveway provided for in this section shall be maintained in its current condition and location, as legally described in attached Exhibit B and depicted in the attached Exhibit C. B. Cutting, mowing or removing shrubs or other vegetation, and cutting or removing trees, except for tree disease control by or as directed by a governmental agency and except by special permit for maintenance or as part of an approved vegetation management plan. Grantors may remove brush, buckthorn, diseased or dead trees of any size, and noxious weeds. C. Except in connection with the rights to maintain the driveway in its current condition and location allowed under Paragraph IA, excavation or filling or material alteration of grade, including changes to the size, depth or contour of the wetland; dredging, mining or removal of earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material. D. Free warning of domestic animals (i.e., horses, sheep, chickens, etc.). E. The deposit of waste, yard waste, or debris. F. Activity detrimental to the screening of the neighboring properties. G. Application of fertilizers, whether natural or chemical. H. Application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. The application of herbicides, pesticides, and insecticides, except for noxious weed control by or as directed by a governmental agency. Outside storage of any kind. K. Activity detrimental to the preservation of the trees, slopes, scenic beauty, vegetation, and wildlife. Installation of public trails within the Easement Property required by the City as a condition of approval of the Jeurissen Ridge Addition and consistent with approved plans and conditions of the Development Contract for the Camden Ridge plat is deemed to be approved by the City for purposes of Paragraph 1. 2. Grantor, its successors and assigns, further grants the City the affirmative right, but not the obligation to do the following on the easement premises: A. Preserve, improve, and enhance the wetland, creek, buffer, trees, vegetation, and natural habitat by altering, clearing, and removing trees or other vegetation, by changing the contour of the land, by planting trees or other vegetation, and taking all appropriate actions to comply with federal, state, and local regulations related to wetlands, including the Bluff Creek Management Plan, the Bluff Creek TMDL and the Second General Surface Water Management Plan. The City's rights under this provision shall not interfere with the use of the driveway as provided under Paragraph I of this Agreement. 171583v5 2 B. Enter upon the easement premises at any time to enforce compliance with the terms of this instrument. Further, the City may enforce the terms of this Easement by any proceeding in law or in equity to restrain violation, to compel compliance, or to recover damages, including attorneys' fees and costs of the enforcement actions. Grantor is not liable for the actions of any third party, other than its employees, agents or contractors, which may violate the terms of this Easement, unless Grantor, its employees, agents or contractors had actual knowledge of the violation and failed to take reasonable action to stop the violation. 3. Failure to enforce any provision of this Easement upon a violation of it cannot be deemed a waiver of the right to do so as to that or any subsequent violation. 4. Invalidation of any of the terms of this Easement will in no way affect any of the other terms, which will remain in full force and effect. 5. This Easement does not convey a right to the public use of the Easement Property nor does it convey any right of possession in the Easement Property to the public or the City. Access by the City to the Easement Property is limited to access necessary for purposes of inspection and enforcement as specified in paragraph 2 above. The City is not be entitled to share in any award or other compensation given in connection with a condemnation or negotiated acquisition of all or any part of the Easement Property by any authority having the power of eminent domain. The City hereby waives any right it may have to such an award or compensation. 6. Acceptance of this Easement by the City and the recording of this document constitutes the City's consent to be bound by its terms. 7. This Easement runs with the Easement Property and be binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns, and inures to the benefit of the City, its successors and assigns. 1715s3v5 3 8. This Easement may be amended or released on whole or in part upon consent of the City. 9. The City acknowledges that the Grantor's conveyance of the herein contained Easement constitutes a gift to the City, and the City agrees to sign the "Donee Acknowledgement" portion of Internal Revenue Service Form 8283, as soon as such Form has been completed and assigned by a licensed appraiser. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this instrument on the date first written above. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank.] 171583v5 4 GRANTOR: B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF vP^ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2013, by ,jou r'i sscv, the � of B. Elm r Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on its behalf. PATRICK J NEATON NotarLY 1c NOTAAY PUBLIC•MWNES01X A'rCa ma+p Exp k" Jan.31,7AK 171583c2 GRANTEE: CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: (� A +.. Thomases Furlong, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -30 Uti day of 2013, by Thomas A. Furlong and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and ty M ager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted,by its Cijy Coltncil. 1►1 KAREN J.ENGELHARDT Notary Public -Minnesota y Commission bores Jan 31, 2015 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUI'SON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP 1715830 6 EXHIBIT A Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. 1715830 Legal Description of Driveway OUTLOT B OUTLOT A g fp ev r3 (J 4:/ �J In ~ ` 0 O~ OUTLOT C h ,r r a CORNER OF OUTLOT B 80 M a 0 Scale In Fest Pr000sed descr'DNon for an mareurff and t A 26.00 last nide easement for mgrees and egfem purposes lying a.,. under and across Outbt B, JEURSSEN RIDGE, oecording to the recorded Drat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, the certarllre of said easdnenl is descrioed as talose: Cammencing of the awtneast comer of said OutIM 8; thence on on ossuned burring of North 38 degrees 08 mirules 54 seconds Fast, eorg the soutneastarly Ilns of said Outlot 8, a eklance of 166.70 feet, to the pant of beginning of the aseterline to be described; thence Nath 68 oagrees 04 minutes O1 seconds Wer, a detance 41.60 feet; thecae North S4 oegrees 41 minutes SS seconds Weal, a distance of 36.08 feet; thence North 49 degrees 47 minutes 50 seconds West, a disto�ce of 158.03 feet; toenoe North 64 degrees 15 minutes 43 seconds West, a dironos of 51.08 feet, to an easterly fire of Oueot C, aid JEURM" RIDGE and there terminating. • 7111S WETCH DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW TIF r"STENCE OR NONrXISTFNCE OF ANY FNCROACHMFNTS FROM OR ONTO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND, EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS WHICH AFFECT SAID LAND OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO SMD LAND. 1I1583v5 8 EXHIBIT C Depiction of Driveway O j to Wbt C moss Oudat S Pioneer Tni Name(s) shown on your income tax return I Identifying number Section B. Donated Property Over $5,000 (Except Publicly Traded Securities)- List in this section only items (or groups of similar items) for which you claimed a deduction of more than $5,000 per Rem orgroup (except contributions of publicly traded securities reported in Section A). An appraisal is generally required for property listed in Section B (see instructions). Information on Donated Property - To be completed by the taxpayer and/or the appraiser. 4 Check the box that describes the type of property donated: a Art*(contribution of $20,000 or more) b Qualified Conservation Contribution c Equipment d Art*(contribubonoflessthan$20,000) e X Other Real Estate f Securities g Collectibles" h Intellectual Property i Vehicles i Other 'Art includes paintings, sculptures, watercolors, prints, drawings, ceramics, antiques, decorative arts, textiles, carpets, silver, rare manuscripts, historical memorabilia, and other similar objects. etc., but not art as defined above. 5 (a) Description of donated property (If you need (b) If tangible property was donated, give a brief summary of (c) Appraisedfair more space, attach a separate statement) the overall physical cond it ion of the property at the time of the gift marketvalue A LMER FAMILY FARM LLC owage and preservation 162 880. B and protection easement C D (d) Date aoq uired (e)Howacquiredbydonor lfl Donoescostor (g) For bargain sales, See rnstructlons by donor (mo., yr.) adjusted basis enter amount (h) Amourrtcleimetl sea (I) Date or contribution tletluction 1 6/2010 IPURCHASED 1 374 . 411 J 1.162.580_ 1.162.560_ Taxpayer (Donor) Statement - List each item included in Part I above that the appraisal identifies as having a value of $500 or less. See instructions. I declare that the following items) included in Part 1 above has to the best of my knowledge and belief an appraised value of not more than $500 (per dem). Enter identifying letter from Part 18 describe the specific Rem. See instrs. ► of taxpayer (donor) P. 0�/Lc-�a,��:' Date► 3 -A/ - I declare that I am not the donor, the donee, a party to the transaction in which the donor acquired the property, employed by, or related to any of the foregoing persons, or married to any person who is related to any of the foregoing persons. And, if regularly used by the donor, donee, or parry to the transaction, I performed the majority of my appraisals during my tax year for other persons. Also, I declare that I perform appraisals on a regular basis; and that because of my qualifications as described in the appraisal, I am qualified to make appraisals of the type of property being valued. I certify thatthe appraisal fees were not based on a percentage of the appraised property value. Furthermore, I understand that a false or fraudulent overstatement of the property value as described in the qualified appraisal or this Forth 8283 may subject me to the penalty under section 6701(a) (aiding and abetting the understatement of tax liability). In addition, I understand that 1 maybe subject to a penalty under section 6695A R I know, or reasonably should know, that my appraisal is to be used in connection with a return or claim for refund and a substantial or gross valuation misstatement results from my appraisal. I affirm that I have not been barred from presenting evidence ortestimony bythe Office of Professional Responsibility. Sign I nere 1 wgnamre ► Business address (including room City or town, state, and ZIP code Identifying number This charitable organization acknowledgesthat R is aqualified organization under ion 170(c) and that R received the donated property as described in Section B, Part I, above on thefollowing date► 6� % 2-013l, Furthermore, this organization affirms that in the event R sells, exchanges, or otherwise disposes of the propertydescribed in Section B, Part I (or any portion thereof) within 3 years after the date of receipt, ftwill file Form 8282, Donee Information Return, with the IRS and give the donors copy of that form. This acknowledgment does not represent agreement with the claimed fair market value. Doesthe organization intend to use the propertyfor an unrelated use? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ► ❑ Yes WrNo Address (nbmber, street, and room or suite no.) k ICity ortown, state, and ZIP code T7Boa�trR .D ao 141 Cly )utss r'VJ(j SS -1 t i lto n d / Title , Date 832073 ��(✓C�FD0283-IVI.7 (� Form 8283 (Rev. 12-2013) I CARVER COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES DOCUMENT C(- -- Document No. OFFICE THE A 585320 COUNTY REECC ORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Receipt # RA 201300011292 Certified Recorded on October 07, 2013 3:08 PM DOCUMENT TITLE: DOCUMENT DATE: DOCUMENT NAMES: Fee: $46.00 585320 Mark �I.1 IIIIII III d qren County Recorder EASEMENT :�,\' THIS INSTRUMENT, is made this Z.Z 4 day of = K 2013, by B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Grantor"), for the benefit of the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"). The Grantor, in consideration of good and valuable consideration provided by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants the City a permanent easement ("Easement") for flowage and preservation and protection of wetlands, wetland buffer areas, steep slopes, woodlands and open spaces over, under, on and across the following land within the City of Chanhassen, County of Carver, State of Minnesota and legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" (the "Easement Property"). Grantor, its successors and assigns, hereby covenants and agrees as follows: The following are prohibited within the Easement Property, except as permitted by this Agreement, unless the Grantor obtains the consent of the City or a release of this Easement or portion thereof by the City. A. Constructing, installing, or maintaining anything made by man, including but not limited to buildings, structures, walkways, fences, fireplaces, clothes line poles, playground equipment, roads or hardcover of any nature whatsoever, except: 1) feeders, bird houses, and other devices intended to foster wildlife; and 2) a 26 foot wide driveway to be used solely to access Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge Addition, from Pioneer trail, solely for agricultural purposes, which use must cease when Outlot C is no longer used for agricultural purposes or if an alternate access is provided to Outlot C. The driveway provided for in this section shall be maintained in its current condition and location, as legally described in attached Exhibit B and depicted in the attached Exhibit C. B. Cutting, mowing or removing shrubs or other vegetation, and cutting or removing trees, except for tree disease control by or as directed by a governmental agency and except by special permit for maintenance or as part of an approved vegetation management plan. Grantors may remove brush, buckthorn, diseased or dead trees of any size, and noxious weeds. C. Except in connection with the rights to maintain the driveway in its current condition and location allowed under Paragraph IA, excavation or filling or material alteration of grade, including changes to the size, depth or contour of the wetland; dredging, mining or removal of earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material. D. Free roaming of domestic animals (i.e., horses, sheep, chickens, etc.). E. The deposit of waste, yard waste, or debris. F. Activity detrimental to the screening of the neighboring properties. G. Application of fertilizers, whether natural or chemical. H. Application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. The application of herbicides, pesticides, and insecticides, except for noxious weed control by or as directed by a governmental agency. J. Outside storage of any kind. K. Activity detrimental to the preservation of the trees, slopes, scenic beauty, vegetation, and wildlife. Installation of public trails within the Easement Property required by the City as a condition of approval of the Jeurissen Ridge Addition and consistent with approved plans and conditions of the Development Contract for the Camden Ridge plat is deemed to be approved by the City for purposes of Paragraph 1. 2. Grantor, its successors and assigns, further grants the City the affirmative right, but not the obligation to do the following on the easement premises: A. Preserve, improve, and enhance the wetland, creek, buffer, trees, vegetation, and natural habitat by altering, clearing, and removing trees or other vegetation, by changing the contour of the land, by planting trees or other vegetation, and taking all appropriate actions to comply with federal, state, and local regulations related to wetlands, including the Bluff Creek Management Plan, the Bluff Creek TMDL and the Second General Surface Water Management Plan. The City's rights under this provision shall not interfere with the use of the driveway as provided under Paragraph IA of this Agreement. 171583v5 B. Enter upon the easement premises at any time to enforce compliance with the terms of this instrument. Further, the City may enforce the terms of this Easement by any proceeding in law or in equity to restrain violation, to compel compliance, or to recover damages, including attorneys' fees and costs of the enforcement actions. Grantor is not liable for the actions of any third party, other than its employees, agents or contractors, which may violate the terms of this Easement, unless Grantor, its employees, agents or contractors had actual knowledge of the violation and failed to take reasonable action to stop the violation. 3. Failure to enforce any provision of this Easement upon a violation of it cannot be deemed a waiver of the right to do so as to that or any subsequent violation. 4. Invalidation of any of the terms of this Easement will in no way affect any of the other terms, which will remain in full force and effect. 5. This Easement does not convey a right to the public use of the Easement Property nor does it convey any right of possession in the Easement Property to the public or the City. Access by the City to the Easement Property is limited to access necessary for purposes of inspection and enforcement as specified in paragraph 2 above. The City is not be entitled to share in any award or other compensation given in connection with a condemnation or negotiated acquisition of all or any part of the Easement Property by any authority having the power of eminent domain. The City hereby waives any right it may have to such an award or compensation. 6. Acceptance of this Easement by the City and the recording of this document constitutes the City's consent to be bound by its terms. 7. This Easement runs with the Easement Property and be binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns, and inures to the benefit of the City, its successors and assigns. 171as3vs 3 8. This Easement may be amended or released on whole or in part upon consent of the City. 9. The City acknowledges that the Grantor's conveyance of the herein contained Easement constitutes a gift to the City, and the City agrees to sign the "Donee Acknowledgement" portion of Internal Revenue Service Form 8283, as soon as such Form has been completed and assigned by a licensed appraiser. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this instrument on the date first written above. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank.] 1715830 4 GRANTOR: B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC By Its:�-,�- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF YP ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of '2013, by ��rLrc C , j eu r i ssew the of B. Elm r Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on its behalf. PATRICKJNEAM Notary 1c NOM Pukx-M"jEWM 171583v.2 GRANTEE: CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Thomases Furlong, ] City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -j O a ' day of *ty ��y2013, by Thomas A. Furlong and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and M ager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority grantedlby its City Coltrtcil. KAREN J.ENGELHARDT Notary Public -Minnesota Y Commleslon Expires Jan 31, 2015 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP 171583v5 6 Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded Plat thereof. 1715830 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Driveway OUTLOT B OUTLOT A a g I (� C lb o� OUTLOT C d� <c pC 1� -SE CORNER OF 0J110T 9 SO 25 a fiD Scale h Feet PIDDosed description for an inaress and egress easement A 26.00 foot wide easement for mg,ees and egrew purposes lying own. undid, and across Outlol B, JEURISSEN RIDGE. 0=0wding to the recorded plot thereof, Cory County, Minnesota, the demenine of sold easement 'rs dewcrbed as follows; Commencing at the southeast darner of sold Outlot 8; thence an an assumed bearing of Nath 36 degrces 08 mllrutes 54 Seconds Fast, along the soulheasteny the of said Oullot 8, o GMtaai of 166.70 (set, to the saki of beginning of the interline to be deserDed; thence NwW 68 oegrms 04 minutes 01 seconds Weet, o distance 41.60 feel; thence North 54 degrees 41 minutes u seconds Weal, a distance of 36.06 feet; thence North 49 degrees 47 minutes 50 seconds West, a defence of 158.03 feet; thence North 64 degrees 15 minutia 43 seconds Waal. o dietonis of 51.08 feet, to an easterly Ilne of Outlet C, sold SEURISSEN WDri and there ierminoting. e THIS SRET04 DOES NOT PURPORT TO 14OW THE FASTFNCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY FNCROACHMENTS FROM OR ONTO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND, EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS WHICH AFFECT SAID LAND OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID -AND. 171583v5 g APPRAISAL OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT Jeurissen Ridge Outlots B and C Chanhassen, MN 55317 Outlot B and Outlot C Jeurissen Ridge FOR B Elmer Family Farms LLC 19450 281 st Street Belle Plaine, MN 56011 OPINION OF VALUE BEFORE: $1,264,000 AFTER: $101,120 AS OF July 25, 2013 BY Nathan Haasken Chestnut Realty 413 N Chestnut Street Chaska, MN 55318 (952)448-3344 NHaasken@gmail.com http://www.ChestnutRealty.com Form GA1V_LT - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE w Borrower Jeurissen Bruce Re No. L1 12914 Property Address Jeudwen Ridge Outlots B and C _ Chanhassen .- Cou Carver Sale MN Zf Code 55317 Lender/Client B Elmer Famflv Farms LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS FlRREAAISPAPAddendum........................................................................................................ 1 Summaryof Salierd Features............................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................... 2 GPLand................................................................................._..............._............................................................................................_......................... 3 AdditionalComparables 4.6.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 SubjectProperty ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Comparable#1................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Comparable#2................................................................................................................._.._......................................................................................... 9 Comparable#3................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Comparable#4.................................................................................................._............................................................................................................ 11 Comparable#5............................................................................................................._.._............................................................................................. 12 Comparable#6................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 ComparableLocation Map................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 AfterDedication Comparables........................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 AfterDedication Comparable # 1....................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 AfterDedication Comparable#2....................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 AfterDedication Comparable#3................................................... ................................................................................................ ...................... ............. 18 Form TOCNP LT - TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc -1-800-ALAMODE I" FIRREA / USPAP ADDENDUM I State of Work of Not Applicable 4 1. This appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or an approval of a loan. 2. My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result or the occurrence of a subsequent event. l4r�ti� .-^- Appraiser. Nathan Haasken Signed Date: 01/31/2014 Certification or License #: 40041956 Certification or License State: MN _ Expires: 08/31/2015 — _.. Effective Date of Appraisal: July 25. 2013 Supervisory Appraiser. Signed Date: Certification or License #: Certification or License State: _ bores Inspection of Subject: ] Did Not Exterior Only Interior and Extenor I'm MA Ll - •IUTAV appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE Subject Address: Jeurissen Ridge Oudots B and C Legal Description: Oueot B and Ou0ot C Jeunssen Ridge PID: 253620020 and 253620030 Client: B Elmer Family Fars LLC Purpose: Establish a fair market value BEFORE the easement and establish a fair market value AFTER the easement. Size BEFORE: 12.64 acres Highest and Best Use BEFORE: Land held for residential development Value BEFORE: $100,000 per acre or $1,264,000 Size AFTER: 12.64 acres Highest and Best Use AFTER: Agricultural and or recreational uses Value AFTER: $8,000 per acre or $101,120 Gn SI ID - 40TEI • emraieal en 2m hu 2 b mule w - 1-a Al eunne (952)448-3344 r n ----------� _Mzm File No. L1 12914 i Paye N 3 of 41 LAND APPRAISAL REPORT ti 12914 -`- r w ■ L n' 1 , -•n"y — •w °, °. lllvu�. ulc. ,,,,, ,u,,,, n ay ue lepmuuceu unmooinea w ua wrmen permission, nowever, a w mode, inc. must be acknowledged and credited. l� 1 A Y IJ Form GPLND LT - °TOTAL' appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE 3/2007 �rti rN.. a rcra-r't Prcperty Address: Jeurissen Rjdae Outlots B and C City. Chanhassen State: MN ZIP Code: 55317 County Carver Legal Description: Outlot Band Outlot C Jeurissen Fridge rn Assessors Parcel #: 253620020 8 253620030 Tax Year. 2013 R.E. Taxes: $ Unknown Special Assessments: $ Unknown Market Area Name: Jeurissen Ridge -.Map Reference: 33460 Census Tract 0907.01 Current Owner of Record: B Elmer Family Farms LLC_ Borrower (g applicable): Jeurissen, Bruce __ __ Proleet T rf a licable : PUD — yPe. Pp _ )_ ® ❑ De Minimis PUD ❑ Other_ describe _ HOA_ E ❑per year _ Q ep r mo dh Are there any existing Improvements to the property? ® No C Yes ti Yes, indicate current occupancy: Owner ❑ Tenant ® vacant ❑ Not habitable N Yes, give a brief description: Not Improvements located on subject property The purpose of this appraisal is to develop an opinion of Market Value (as defined) or other type of value (describe) This report reflects the following value (d not Current see comments : Current a Ins ecton Date is the Effective Date Retros ective C —t_ P Q Prospective Wr RightsAppraised: ® Fee Simple Q Leasehold _ C Leased Fee E. Other (describe) hkt kaended Use: General Information and Tax purposes Intended User(s) (by name or type): B Elmer FamilyFarms LLC Bruce Jeurissen and their tax advisor _ gent B Elmer Family Farms LLC Address: 19450281st Street, Belle Plaine MN 56011 Appraiser. Nathan Haasken Address: 413 N Chestnut Street Chaska MN 55318 Characteristics Location: ID Urban X Suburban Q Rural Built up: ❑ Over 75% X 25-75% Q Under 25% Growth rate: ❑ Rapid X Stable ❑ Slow Property values: IncreasingT_8%— Stable Q Declining Demand/supply: Q Shortage ] In Balance Q Over Supply Markebng time: 71 Under 3 Mas. X 3-6 Mos. Over 6 Mos. Predominant Occupancy Owner 88 Tenant 12 Vacant (0-5%) Q Vacant (>5%) One -Unit Housing PRICE AGE $(000) (yrs) 114 Low 1 Present Land Use One -Unit 34.1% Change in Land Use Not Likely ] Likely * [ In Process * To: -- — 2-40 __ -18 % Multi -Unit 1 % 2175 h 141 __ Comm'I _ 442 Pred 23 Park/0N 20.9 % 340 MLS sales in 13' untleveloDalth 34i Factors Affecting Marketability hem Good Average Fair Poor WA Item Good Average Fair Poo WA Employment Stability ❑ ® ❑ Q [ Adequacy of UtilNes � $ Q 0Convenience to Employment ❑ ® ❑ ❑ [ Property Compatibility Q ❑ ❑ Convenience to Shopping ❑ X Q Q [ Protection from Detrimental Conditions D X EJ Q E z Convenience to Schools $ Q C Q Q Police and Fire Protection Q X Q Q o Adequacy of Public T anspo talion ® ] ❑ ❑ Q General Appearance of Properties Q Q- E a Recreational Facilities Q $E Ej Q Appeal to Market — x - U Market Area Comments: The market area in confined to eastern Carver County and western Hennepin County or more specifically County w Road 11 to the west, Minnesota Highway 7 to the north. Interstate 484 to the east and ft Minnesota River to the south. The describer e market area has seen real estate values increase on average 5% over the past two years with home listed on the open market selling within of 30 days of the mmol hsUng over the pest twelve months. There are a number of new housing developments going on within the market area and -the surroundingarea _ including housing developments by Lennar, Centex Kerber and otirer nafional and local developers. F- LU — Y Q i — r w ■ L n' 1 , -•n"y — •w °, °. lllvu�. ulc. ,,,,, ,u,,,, n ay ue lepmuuceu unmooinea w ua wrmen permission, nowever, a w mode, inc. must be acknowledged and credited. l� 1 A Y IJ Form GPLND LT - °TOTAL' appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE 3/2007 LAND APPRAISAL REPORT ,- M*n Fk No. Li 12914;.Page#_4441 L1 12914 Fe No.: L1 12914 LAND�.V .> cw' uy a a nwue, nc. mrs iwm may m reiamucec unmoomea w mour wrmen peMSSmn, nowever, a is moae, me must be acknowledged and Credited, Form GPLND_LT -'TOTAL" appraisal software by a la made, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE 3/2007 Dimensions: Site Area: 12.64 Acres -"-� Zoning Classification: A2 -Agricultural Estate District Description: The A2 zoning designation falls under the definition of Public Semi -Public Land use in"the cf of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive_Plan_ j2-10 Land_ Use),._According to the city, currently the....__.._ _hL._-- subject property has no buildinq entitlements. Do present improvements ccomply with existing zoning requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No X No Improvements Uses allowed under current zoning: According t0 planning"and zonin�_of city of Chanhassen this Properly currently can be used has crop land or recreational land. Are CC&Rs applicable? ❑ Yes ❑ No X Unknown Have the documents been reviewed? ❑ Yes ® No Ground Rent (d appfrc ibe) $ / Comments: This property is part of the Jeurissen Ridge neighborhood but it is unknown as of yet if there will be CC&Rs Highest & Best Use as improved: ❑ Present use, or X Other use (explain) Land held for future development Actual Use as of Effective Date: Land held for future development Use as appraised in this report Land held for future development Summary of Highest & Best Use: The highest and best use of the subject property until the property is able to be developed with city utilities z outilities g- U rn - �- Public Other Provider/Description Electricity ❑ ❑ None on site Gas ❑ ❑ None on site Water ❑ ❑ None on site Sanitary Sewer ❑ ❑ None on site Storm Sewer ❑ ❑ None on site Telephone ❑ ❑ None -on site -_. Multimedia❑ ❑ None on site Off-sfteImprovementsType Public Private Street None, currently land locket ❑ '� Width WA __ __ Surface N/A Curb/Gutter None _ ❑ ❑ Sidewalk None _ ❑ '] Sheet Lights Non__ ❑ iJ e_ --___-- Alle None ❑ Frontage None Topography Rollin Size 12.64 acres Shape I ular Drainage Average View Woods/Right of Way — - — - .----------- ------ -------------- Cther site elemems: Inside Lot _] ComerLo[ � Cul de Sac ❑ Underground Utilities E:Other describe FEMA S ecl Food Hazard Area I Yes ® Na FEMA Fbod Zone C FEMA Map # 27005100058 FEMA Date 07/02/1979 Site Comments: Currently the subject property is landlocked in the sense there is no road frontage However, the client/owners do retain - agricultural access to the subject property from Pioneer Trail. This access is purely for agricultural purposes and cannot be used as a - Personal driveway or development access. According the Kate Aanenson with the city of Chanhassen the subject props currentlhas no —�--- Y `- building entitlements or development potential FEATURE _ SUBJECT PROPERTY COMPARABLE NO.1 COMPARABLE NO.2 COMPARABLE NO.3 Address Jeurissen Ridge Outlots B and C Chanhassen MN 55317 Pioneer Trail and Powers Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 5980 Marsh Lake Road Chaska MN 55318 _ lax Marsh Lake Road Chaska MN 55318 Proxim�cd SJ.�t .-1 1.65 miles SW $ 2655000 6.22 miles W _ _ $ 2 250 000 12.14 miles W $ 1,947,000 Sale_ — $ Price/Acre" $ 8 115837.70 - $ 57 034.22 $ 52,907.611 Q Data Source(s) aVenhcalion Source(s) a VALUETMENT zSales or Fnancmg O Concessions _ Client CitY of Chanhassen DESCRIPTION Cash equivalent None Office Files/County, Records Buyer/Seller _ _ DESCRIPTION +- %Adjust Cash equivalent 0 None 0 ._ _._._ Carver County Records Carver County, Assessor ,, - Carver County Records Bu er/Seller _ DESCRIPTION _ +- % ust Cash equivalent 0 None 0 _ DESCRIPTION__" Cash equivalent 0 None 0 Date of Saleirrime July 25 2013 August 5 2013 0 April 29 2013 1 0 _ Mav 1 2013 0 R' his Appraised Fee Simple Fee Sime 0 Fee Sim le 1 0 Fee Sime 0 Location Chanhassen Chanhassen 0 Chaska I Chaska 0 Site Area"ln Acres"__... 12.6422.92 -- 0 39.45 0 36.8 0 Useable Land 66% 92% --i6 79% �— -1383% -1 NetAd jTatal, in $1 _ — - - + _ + - + � $ 1 7 +-- � g 17 % (17 % of $/Acre) 43913.61 " Ad usNet Adjustment ed tm SalePricein r$ A f $ / Acre) .' ° -26 /° 85 7/Acre _.. �$ (-13 °'° of $/Acre) 49 620.22 LAND�.V .> cw' uy a a nwue, nc. mrs iwm may m reiamucec unmoomea w mour wrmen peMSSmn, nowever, a is moae, me must be acknowledged and Credited, Form GPLND_LT -'TOTAL" appraisal software by a la made, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE 3/2007 LAND APPRAISAL RFPOPT Main File No.L112914 i PAe#5cf411 Lt 12914 mLAN D 0,1, .7 by a la mode, inc. This form may be reproduced unmodified wdhoul warren permission. however. a la Milder Ire must be acknowledged and creGrted. Form GPLND LT -'TOTAL' appraisal software by a la made, Inc -1-800-ALAMODE 3/2007 of Saes Comparison ApproachThe only adjustments made were for useable land whkrth is on a 1 to 1 ratio meaning for every 10% CSummary difference in useable land a 10% adfusbnent was made 0 -- ---—_..._-..._._..__ _.-... — z 0 - N a. 0 — — - rn w - N My research X did <J did not reveal any prior sales or transfers of the subject property for the three years prior to the effective date of this appraisal. K Data Source s : Client Carver Coun Records 1 st Prior Su 'ect Sale/fransfer Analysis of sale/transfer history and/or any current agreement of saWSsting: OriginalN this parcel was Dart of a larger �. Date: Au ust 5 2013 tract of land that was separated into three separate parcels The larger parcel consisted of 22.92 acres Price_ which was purchased an August 5, 2013 by US Homes CorQ(dba Lennar Homes) for the amount of w $2 655 000 Soume s : ClientrCarver CountyX2,655.000. rn 2nd Prior Sub' Sak(Transfer ¢ Date: — Price: -- cume s PROJECT INFORMATION FOR PUDs flif a licable) X The Subject is part of a Planned Unit Development. o Legal Name of Project Jeurissen Ridge L Describe common elements and recreational faclhhes None -- - - -- - -- -- — --- ....... ___ Indicated Valli : Seks Comparison Approach $ 1,264,000 or $ 100,000 per Acre Final Reconciliation See Attached z F - This "as Zi appraisal is made ® is", Or ❑ subject to the fdbwing conditions: U z -- .__ — 0 ._—.—......___—__......... w X This report is also subiect sub'to other Hypothetical Conditions and/or Extraordinary Assumptions as specified in the attached addenda. Based upon an inspection of the subject property, defined Scope of Work, Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, and Appraiser's Certifications, my (our) Opinion of the Market Value (or other specified value type), as defined herein, of the real property that is the subject of this report is: $ 1,264,000 , as of: July 25, 2013 , which is the effective date of this appraisal. If indicated above this Opinion of Value is subject to Hypothetical Conditions and/or Extraordinary Assumptions included in this report. See attached addenda. = A true and complete copy of this report contains 41 pages, including exhibits which are considered an integral part of the report. This appraisal report may not be U property understood without reference to the information contained in the complete report, which contains the following attached exhibits: Scope of Work X Limiting condJCerfrf cations .. ] Narrative Addendum Location Map(s) Flood Addendum X Additional Sales q QS Photo Addenda Parcel Ma ❑ Hypothetical Conditions Extraordinary Assumptions Client Contact: Bruce Jeurissen ____ _ _ _ _ Client Name: B Elmer Family Farms LLC _ __ _ E -Mail. Address: 19450 281st Street Belle Plaine MN 56011 APPRAISER % r1 r J i /1 SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (K required) or CO -APPRAISER (if applicable) W Appraiser Name: Nathan Haasken Supervisory or Co -Appraiser Name: (;ompany: Chestnut Really -- _ Company: Phone: (952) 448-3344 Fax:(9 52) 448-5310 Phone: Farr z �' E -Mail: NHaasken(alpmail.com E -Mail: Date of Report (Signature):- 01/31l2014 -- - Date of Report (Signature): License or Certif cation #:g: 40041956 _ State; MN _ License or Certification #: Designation: Cert�ed_Residential Appraiser Designation: Expiration Date of License or Certification: 08/31/2015 Expiration Date off License or Certification: _ _ _ __ Inspector of Subject $ Did Inspect J Did Not Inspect (Desktop) __ Inspection of Subject: ] Did Inspect ❑ Did Not Inspect Date of Inspection: Janua 19 2013 C IdO Date of Inspection: mLAN D 0,1, .7 by a la mode, inc. This form may be reproduced unmodified wdhoul warren permission. however. a la Milder Ire must be acknowledged and creGrted. Form GPLND LT -'TOTAL' appraisal software by a la made, Inc -1-800-ALAMODE 3/2007 ADDITIONAL COMPARABLE SALES Maar Fee No LI 12914! PadeI6d41 Lt 12914 RIAMn' 14 4704A nLAND W, W 2007 by a a mode, M ms ions may de regunoauced oned wAeout written permission, howewx, a la mode, must be XMGWItMed and crecited. Form OPLND_LT.(AC) - TOTAL' appraisal software by a la mode, Inc. -1-800-ALAMODE 3/2007 FEATURE I SUBJECT PROPERTY COMPARABLE NO.4_ COMPARABLE NO. 5 15640 Pioneer Trail Eden Prairie, MN 55347 COMPARABLE NO. 6 16860 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie MN 55347 Address Jeurissen Ridge Outlots B and C Chanhassen MN 55317 ..__ Pro)dTq to Subject 18700 Pioneer Trail Eden Prairie MN 55347 — 2.24 miles E 4.16 miles E 3.53 miles E Sale Price Pnce/ Acre _- E_ $ _ $ 279 774.64 3,662,250_ _ $ _ 1,590000 _ $ _ _8,550 000 $ 158 597.66; __ $ 185 098.95 Data Source(s) Verification SOurce(s) Client C of Chanhassen Hennepin County Assessor Citv of Eden Prairie Hennepin County Assessor City Of Eden Prairie Hennepin County Assessor City of Eden Prairie VALUE ADJUSTMENT --- -- DESCRIPTION — — — ...... DESCRIPTION +(-)%Adryst ----- — DESCRIPTION +(-)%Adjust �.._.. DESCRIPTION 4 +(-)%Adjust Sales or Financing Concessions Cash equivalent None — Cash equivalent 0 None 0 Cash equivalent None 0 0 Cash uivalent 0 BQ— None 0 Date of SaleRme July 25 2013 Dec 27 2012 0 March 15 2012 0 Au ust 5 2013 0 Ri Ms Appraised Fee Simple Fee Simple 0 Fee Simple _ 0 Fee Sim le 0 Location Chanhassen Eden Prairie 0 Eden Prairie I 0 Eden Prairie 0 Site Area In Acres 12.64 13.09 0 8.59— 0-53.91-1 0 Useable Land 66% 100% -34100% '3481% 15 — + - _ (-15 % of $/Acre) 134 808.01 Net Adjustment (Total, in $) 1 + - -34- + X - E -3a Net Adjustment (Total, in % of $ / Acre) Adjusted Sale Price in $ / Acre (-34 % of $/Acre) $ 184,651.26 I (-34 %of $/Acre) $ 122 165.31 X Summary of Sales Comparison Approach The only adjustments made were for useable land which is on a 1 to 1 ratio meaning for every 10% difference in useable land a 10% adiustment was made. Q K —_—_ CLIL - ---- - z — O rn a--- M U -- - - - -_. - -- 111 V1 nLAND W, W 2007 by a a mode, M ms ions may de regunoauced oned wAeout written permission, howewx, a la mode, must be XMGWItMed and crecited. Form OPLND_LT.(AC) - TOTAL' appraisal software by a la mode, Inc. -1-800-ALAMODE 3/2007 I MltMFortb_L7120H I Ppe#7A41 I Subiect Proeertv Sonoaer Jeudeaen Bruce I TM Address Jeudssen Rid a Outlols Band C Chanhassen Carver Stag MN ApCode 55317 Lender nal[ B Elmer Family Forms LLC s Address:Jeudssen Ridge Oudots B and C Legal: Outlol B Jeurissen Ridge and Outlot C Jeurissen Ridge, Carver County PID: 253620020 (oudot B)and 253620030(outlot C) Acres: 12.64 acres J/ Description: The subject property is located just north of US Highway 212 on the western edge of Chaska city limits. The 12.64 acre subject Property is divided into two separate parcels with the larger of the parcel, Oudot B, located along the northern portion of the subject Property. Outlol B follows the contour of Bluff Creek and consists primarily of woodland. Outlot C is surrounded by outlot B and consist Primarily of billable land with woods sphered along the eastern and western side. Currently, the subject Property is only accessible via an road easement suitable for only agricultural means. Form HIAAAPP 'TOTAL' asoraisal software by a la mode. inc - t -800 -AL WOOF I ftWNAL11Ys14 I PAoeisal/tI Comparable #1 8ollpwx Jeurlseen BWOO AdNess Jeudssen Rid a Outlots B and C Chanhassen Carver SIO MN Cotle 55317 lsMsgCk1A B Elmer Fa illy Farms LLC Address: Pioneer Trail 8 Powers Blvd, Chanhassen Legal: Lengthy , metes and bounds, Carver County PID: 253620010 Anes: 22.92 Sale Price: $2,655,000 PHceper Acre: $115,838 Date Closed: August 5, 2013 Buyer. US Hamas Crop (dba Lemsr Homes) Seller: Juerissen, Bruce Description: This land was purchased by a national builder to be developed into detached single family kits. The property is mostly upland with a small creek running along the western property line. At the time of purchase there was an older home and barn on the property that were of no value and were demolished by the buyer. Access to the property was difficult as the developer had to acquire access to the Prop" from Bluff Creek Boulevard to the northwest. flvm HMAPP-gMAI • swtical ttAlwao by a b wrla M-1-PJWL11 AUMP LAWWr OL112914 A PN9♦9of41 Comparable #2 eucemaO =e5, s JdNn Cutlets B and C Chanhassen Carver 3�k CWO 55317 IAItllRIErt 8 Elmer Femil Farms LLC Address: 5980 Marsh Lake Road, Chaska Legal: Section 23 Township 116, Range 24, Carver County PID: 650231000 and 650231100 Acres: 39.45 Sale Prins: $2,250,000 Price per Acre: $57,034 Dale Closed: Apn129,2013 Buyer: Halla Properties, LLP Seller. Amencana Community Bank Description: This transaction included two separate parcels located north of Marsh Lake Road with lake shore frontage on Wasserman Lake. P10#650231000 consisted of 27.85 acres and PID# 650231100 consisted of 11.6 acres. Of the 39.45 acres approximately 8.1 acres is Imtwaste land. The property is heavily wooded in the north and west. Bvm HmAw. RnTAI• 2v iui cnkuvm M a b mm N,. rinn. A I Aunnc I MYhh FYes.L117911 I PW#IOOr41 Comparable #3 BMC%w Jaudssen Bruce A�rsss Jeudssen RId Outlols B entl C Chanhassen CaA Carver St8 MN ZO COOS 55317 L111101IrR3e19 B Elmer Family Fans LLC Address: Northeast comer of Marsh Lake Road and County Road 43, Victoria Legal: Part of the SW 114 of Section 23, Township 116, Range 24, Carver County PID: TBD Acres: 36.8 Sale Price: $1,947,000 Price per Acre: $52,907 Date Closed: May 1, 2013 Buyer Ryland Homes, Inc Seller DM 6 RS Limited Partners Description: According to Brent Hislop, the Realtor representing the seller, this parcel was under contract for approximately one year prior to dosing. Ryland Homes, Inc purchased the land for residential development which has been approved by the city of Victoria. As part of this transaction, the city of Victoria has agreed to expand city sewer and water service half a mile to the property's west property line. The approved development will consist of 59 residential lots with an average purchase price of $33,000 per lot. The parties closed on the first phase, 36 lots, in May 2013 for $1,160,000 with Ryland having an option on the 2nd phase, an additional 23 lots. Poml HMAPP -'TOTAL" amraisal sntlw m. by a la rnrrk w -1 m u aunnc I M*Fb Ns LIIM4 I Peae#11" Comparable #4 Barter JeuAasen Bruce Alltlress Jeudseen Outlota Band C Chanhassen Clever SUPE hyf 55317 LMNA7elt B Elmer Family Farm LLC Address: 18700 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie Legal: Section 30, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County PID: 1911622340008;3011622210007;3011622210010 Acres: 13.09 Sale Price: $3,662,250 Price per Acre: $279,774 Date Closed: December 27, 2012 Buyer. D.R. Horton, Inc Seller. Natalie Coe, LLC Description: This parcel is a long narrow stretch, sandwiched between Lake Riley and Pioneer Trail with access to Riley Lake Road. The buyer has developed this parcel into single family detached homes with utilities. While this property has obstructed views of Lake Riley, there is no lake frontage or neighborhood access. Form HMAPP - "TOTAL" aooraisal software by a la naMe inr. - 1-An0-AI AMrInF I. laanfMNo. L112014 1 Pah a 12 d41 1 Comparable #5 6olrawer J"dssen &uw Address Jeurissen Rltl a OutloM B and C 0 Chanhassen catirillt Carver Ste MN ZIP Cada 56317 iicwi w B Elmer Family Farre LLC Address: 15640 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie Legal: Unplatted 21 116 22 that part of NWi14 of SW 114 lying E of W 963 85/10011 and NLV of Co Rd Not subject to road PID: 2111622320003 Acres: 8.59 Sale Price: $1,590,000 Price per Acre: $115,250 Date Closed: March 15, 2012 Buyer SK Partner;, LLC Seller: McGraw, Michael Description: The overall purchase price for this parcel was $1,590,000 of which, the sellers received $990,000 in cash and the buyers assumed a special assessment of $600,000 resulting in a total purchase price of $1,590,000. This information was verified by the city of Eden Prairie appraiser. Prior to this dosing the buyers, SK Partners, had already sold the property to Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC for $2,000,000 which also closed on March 15, 2012. As part of that transaction SK Partners had to pay off the $600,000 special assessment and get plat approval for a development of 20 single family detached lots. The payoff of the special assessments and the plat approval contributed to the sale price of $2,000,000. Form HMAPP -'TOTAL" amraisal snftwarn. by a a mrole. inc. - 1-Rnn-Al AMOOP I FLM F& No. 1112914 1 P40e/i7 of41 1 Comparable #B Baasad Jeudssen Moe M Address Jeudssen Ridge Outlots B and C Chanhassen Carver $Yes MN 2bCode 55317 lMELAgad B Elmer Family Fames LLC Address: 16860 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie Legal: Unplatted 29 116 22 WI/2 of SWl/4 of SE1/4 Ex Road PID: 2911622420004;2911622430005;2911622420005;2911622340002;2911622430007;2911622310011 Acres: 53.91 Sale Price: $8,550,000 Pdoe per Acre: $158,597 Date Closed: August 5, 2013 Buyer. Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC Seller Loren Reeder Wuttke Revocable Trust Description: This property is located at the southwest comer of Beverly Drive and Eden Prairie Road with frontage on Flying Cloud Drive (CSAH 61). The buyer has begun to develop this land and the surrounding area into single family homes with public utilities. rmm KYWP- 'fnTel •,nm,i„ I eve hv, 1. �o in, . r-nnn_ai Funnc Ail IFReNo.L112914 PageB140141 Comparable Location Map Borrower Jeudssen, Bruce Pro a Address Jeurissen Ridge Ou[bts B and C Cty ___.,__ .Chanhassen CoAy Carver State MN ➢p Code 55317 Lender/Client B Elmer Family Farms LLC a la , `wOn. a. Pay - A Ana ,w - 6 u - - Way;: u,--� AW - �i ���� ✓� Forest >4r(A'knf gay � - - 2 �' �J' ' t � xNA ,st l -- �+� ray fh gay 4crysdt.ssl 4+ Se` R - WoWaad _n;nvr H� " a ~Anr Crystal aar BGairKum p1 hda�a a' Prk Lek, m^ say say'_� rv8m,elonlmBearh Minrletc - Gde Waao. rowake rain oGn a Mound SONPark 1s Iia/ayeer t6d �. HIM* say Big Rtgkxd qP' Caaks Lake Carman �siand Pak Win: Minnetrista °ice goy say at, B Pal �Fngc cha! Deephaven 'Y Bay Bay E000 Bm Tonka Bay Bey ; „ Lxhanre.l Ckeenwood 7 1 � Crdnvr sia.d — .,.. � St AMani p, •. J Excelsior - Boy. sior Bttd Gloria :.ala ' Mimemnlo \pMaVA Shorewood 9=bhsDnc. P✓r9a•x• 4 '6 7 1 Saks £etr - - - -q•� --i.niMw.n- . _ - - - - -. u� . .. COMPARABLE No. 5 Pa Say 15640 Pioneer Trail cake ' M,n„e,,,a p i n 4.16 miles E F.. _ tate JAW-, LP1-e . - �. Caner Pak R?serx Carver Belch Lake eu t.arue+r COMPARABLE No. 1 E Luke No- 2 COMPARABLE Pioneer Trail and Powers Blvd ,A. COMPARABLE NO. 4 a� v Vk" 5980 Marsh Lake Road 0.14 miles NE 16700 Pioneer Trail Pa.k 5.35 miles W 2.24 miles E rh R _ den r u lI p _ eF LaYP vs�` 1 r P lace 1✓t* .�'... Nattlrkto Han*;; Lok �\f\ R17ey VWW" Lob M,, s 1. ft mer To' TI 41 �. •-. _ -_.. tot it l Clara Dr COMPARABLE No. 3 Grass xxx Marsh Lake Road .- tote 5.97 miles W t gw and V I f Rivve'- -1hr ury4 Park J�fi+o 2, SU6IECT ; Y ..,., ;4a l hvrissen Ridge Outlots B and C wCOMPARABLE No. 6 L.'• A 16860 Flying Claud Drive 3.53 miles E Dahlgren '212 -6s •:,..y.�r ears- _ ,169'--- — r} r 17N JWeE OIL .+n. craw ZS�lS � Form MAP_LT.LOC - TOTAL" appraisal software by a la made, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE Main Ftle. Na, L112914 Page#15 _of41__� After Dedication Comparables SITE ANALYSIS FEATURE SUBJECT COMPARABLE SITE # 1 COMPARABLE SITE # 2 COMPARABLE SITE # 3 Address Jeurissen Ridge Outlots B and xxx CSAH 61 xxx Co Rd 10 xxx 110th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chaska, MN 55318 Chaska, MN 55318 Cologne, MN 55322 Proximity to Subject 1.66 miles SW 6.22 miles W 12.14 miles W Sale Price $ $ 59,860 $ 722,358 $ 475,000 Price/Acre $ $ 9,501.59 $ 7,283.30 $ 6,785.71 Data Source(s) Client Carver County Records Multiple Listing Service Seller Verification Source(s) City of Chan City of Chaska Carver County Assessor Carver County Assessor ADJUSTMENT ITEMS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION +(-) %Adjust DESCRIPTION +(-) %Adjust DESCRIPTION +(-) %Adjust Sales or Financing Cash equivalent Cash 0 Cash 0 Contract for Deed 0 Concessions None None 0 None 0 None 0 Date of Sale / Time July 27, 2013 June 17, 2013 0 Nov 6, 2013 0 August 28, 2013 0 Rights Appraised Fee Simple Fee Simple 0 Fee Simple 0 Fee Simple 0 Location Chanhassen Chaska 0 Chaska 0 Cologne 0 Site Area (in Acres) 12.64 6.3 099.18 70 0 Net Adjustment (Total, in 3) + [.— $ [+ [— $ Net Adjustment (Total, in % of $ / Acre) Net % Net% Net % Adjusted Sale Price (in $1 Acre) Gross % $ 9,501.59 Grass % $ 7,283.3 Gross Comments: All three of the comparable sites were sold as vacant land with no building eligibilities. Client: B Elmer Family Farms LLC Client File No.: Appraiser file No.: Lt 12914 mCON SU MER Copnht@ 2007 by a la mode, inc. This form may be reproduced unmodified without written permission, however, a la mode, inc. must be acknowledged end credited. Form GPCARG_LT— -'TOTAL' appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE 10/2007 I MNe FYNo. u12914 1 PAM f/6A After Dedication Comparable #1 BOOM Jeudeaen Bruce AM= Jeudasen Ridge Outlots B and C Ey Chanhassen cau Carver SO MN Zill CA 55317 lanaerA M B Bmar Family Farms LLC Address: ma CSAH 61, Chaska Legal: Section 34, Township 116, North 23 Carver County PID: 300340800 Acres: 6.3 Sale Price: $59,860 Price per Am: $9,501 Date Closed: June 17, 2013 Buyer Carver County Seller. Wenz, Donald and Lois; Clark, Betty and Tenil Descriptor: This property is located on the eastern property line of Chaska city limits. This property is consisted primarily of wetland Which is located on the northern property line. According to the city of Chaska, Carver County purchased this parcel to preserve more open space. The parcel is currently zoned P1 which is open space with no building a igibilites. Form HMAPP - 'TOTAL' appraisal software by a Is mode. inc. -1-800-ALAMOOP I Man Rewo. Lt 12x14 I Pawe17x141 j After Dedication Comparable #2 Borrow Jeurissan Bruce Lr —WR AM= Jwdssen 900 Outlas B and C C Chanhassen counly, Carver So MN ZIPCWe 55317 lender B Eimer Farrah, Farms LLC Address: z County Road 10, Chaska Legal: Section 34, Twp 118, Range 24, Carver County PID: 070340330 and 070340340 Acres: 99.18 Sale Price: $722,358 Price per Axe: $7,283 Date Closed: November 6, 2013 Buyer: Goma, Michael Seller City of Victoria Description: This property was sold at auction on September 23, 2013. The overall panOals consists of 66.59 acres of tillable land, 11 acres of low/waste land, and 21.59 acres of pasture land. At the time of sale there were no building eligibilities on the parcel. Form HMAPP -'TOTAL' aooraisel softwa2 by a la mode. inn.. - 1-enn-AI AMnnF 1 �MWLItm• t nu#hshxxt After Dedication Comparable #3 Address: xxx 116th Sheet, Cologne Legal: 70H- aces in W12 of NW V4 of Section 2 TawnaNp 115, Range 25, Carver County PID: 010020610 Acres: 70 Sale Price: 6475,000 Price per Acre: 6,785.71 Date Closed: August 28, 2013 Buyer: Olson, Corey Seller. Rademacher, Thomas and Ruthann Descnption: This property is located north of the city of Cologne and is primarily tillable land with only approximately six acres of lowland. This parcel was purchased on a Contract For Deed, of which the terns is not disclosed to me. At the time of sale, this property had no building enttements. Form HMAPP - 'TOTAL' aooraisal software by ala mnde inc - I AMA] WOOF LMain File No. Lt 12914 Pape # 19 a 41� Location Map :ower Jeurissen, Bruce lerfty Address_ Jeurissen Ridge Clutlots B and C Chanhassen Courrly Carver Stale MN . Zlp Code 55317 Jer/MeniF B Elmer Family Farms LLC ala mode Inc: Lake - ......,.,, , � .----'go –"-•-.. Blacl '# 'I a' S e 1e� r Minnetrista Bad Lukr Tonka Bay - _ .. _ Greewrol i St Bor1ffaC1115 19 _ Excelsior w1- r �o.`nat Shorewood J�l tri Muu 7 I Minmt>: is Sa'� LOA, Pi il- si y tel' IAte Aadrj Lope Lake ZVUhL Lata �4 rltrarlCeaf(!tl 'n i o Lake �9-W 111 - ParA P y� j Luc. tunshn E Loke K16MAn Luke s Lake 11 streyr( ;Ta Ail)VJIn lake s {{[tL -- Arbwetmr exd CI s Victoria I Wacomu Pk SUB)ECi '30 a3 )ei nssen Ridge Outlots B and C m Waconia ry � Ra -234 n elvn c AFTER COMPARABLE No. 2 S - _ P .._.. Huclline _ - 2]j}i III — xxx Co Rd 10 6.22 miles W <' �a 4 41 �C 3 t 4 V Augusta a 11Th st Egg er e•va le Fh'e`9 -- eat Fa bnalhar ,p AFTER COMPARABLDNo3 �aSfxzz ;10th Stre !2.14 miles W Chaska d I AFTER COMPARABLE No. I. Ti Be^ton Dahlgren 212' �e xxx Chaska Blvd Cologne 1.65 miles SW Carver' a top ai Murwm )• to tserh st W 53 j a hs- y U Gotha so , Fast Union # r r7 X Baden 25>miles 4 -Ave _.'ls"_S - �_84w+..'}_� 9�li,:h".TLQ, aA4l Form MAP LTIOC -"TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE This appraisal was constructed to quantify the difference of value in the BEFORE and AFTER case of the conservation of easement dedication. Prior to the dedication of the conservation of easement, it is assumed for the purpose of this appraisal report that the subject property had development access and residential development potential. Therefore, the highest and best use of the subject parcel was land to be held for residential development. With the dedication of the conservation easement the access was limited to agricultural access only and all development potential was eliminated. With the lose of access, the highest and best use of the subject property was charged to agricultural and or recreational uses with no building or development potential (see attached development contract). BEFORE appraised value: BEFORE the dedication of the conservation easement, the subject property (assumed for this assignment) was 12.64 acres within the dry limits of Chanhassen with development potential. Based upon the sales comparison approach the appraised value is $100,000 per acre or $1,264,000. AFTER appraised value: AFTER the dedication of the conservation easement, the subject property becomes a landlocked property with no development potential. The highest and best use of the subject parcel become agricultural/recreational use. Based upon the sales comparison approach of properties with similar highest and best uses, the appraised value in the AFTER scenario is $8,000 per acre or $101,120. The difference in value in the BEFORE and AFTER case is: $1,266,000 - $101,120 = $1,162,880 Fnnn 91 IP - 'TOTAI' ammical cMlwam by a In mrvlo i v - t -Ann -CI Aunnr L Main File NoT1 1129MJN�21d41 — L1 12914 - -- ., lent: B Elmer Family Farms .LLC Address: 19450 281st Street, Belle Plaine, MN 56011 STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS & LIMITING CONDITIONS - The appraiser will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect either the property being appraised or the title to it. The appraiser assumes that the title is good and marketable and, therefore, will not render any opinions about the title. The property is appraised on the basis of it being under responsible ownership. - The appraiser may have provided a plat and/or parcel map in the appraisal report to assist the reader in visualizing the lot size, shape, and/or orientation. The appraiser has not made a survey of the subject property. - If so indicated, the appraiser has examined the available flood maps that are provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (or other data sources) and has noted in the appraisal report whether the subject site is located in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. Because the appraiser is not a surveyor, he or she makes no guarantees, express or implied, regarding this determination. - The appraiser will not give testimony or appear in court because he or she made an appraisal of the property in question, unless specific arrangements to do so have been made beforehand. - The appraiser has noted in the appraisal report any adverse conditions (including, but not limited to, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) observed during the inspection of the subject property, or that he or she became aware of during the normal research involved in performing the appraisal. Unless otherwise stated in the appraisal report, the appraiser has no knowledge of any hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, or adverse environmental conditions (including, but not limited to, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) that would make the property more or less valuable, and has assumed that there are no such conditions and makes no guarantees or warranties, express or implied, regarding the condition of the property. The appraiser will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because the appraiser is not an expert in the field of environmental hazards, the appraisal report must not be considered as an environmental assessment of the property. - The appraiser obtained the information, estimates, and opinions that were expressed in the appraisal report from sources that he or she considers to be reliable and believes them to be true and correct. The appraiser does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. - The appraiser will not disclose the contents of the appraisal report except as provided for in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, and any applicable federal, state or local laws. - An appraiser's client is the party (or parties) who engage an appraiser in a specific assignment Any other party acquiring this report from the client does not become a party to the appraiser -client relationship. Any persons receiving this appraisal report because of disclosure requirements applicable to the appraiser's client do not became intended users of this report unless specifically identified by the client at the time of the assignment. - The appraiser's written consent and approval must be obtained before this appraisal report can be conveyed by anyone to the public, through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or by means of any other media, or by its inclusion in a private or public database. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of publication. - Forecasts of effective demand for the highest and best use or the best fitting and most appropriate use were based on the best available data concerning the market and are subject to conditions of economic uncertainty about the future. /t A' Copynghtc 2097 by a p mode. inc. This ton may be reproduced unmodifiedwdhaut wmten permission, however. a la mode. inc. must be acknowledged and credited. 11' V Form GPLNDAD_LT -`TOTAL° appraisal software by a la mode, Inc. -1-800-ALAMODE 3/2007 Air e Outiots B and C. LLC Address: Address: -Mahflk NoNo. lH2914 Pa9razar4l L1 12914 DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE *: Market value means the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. Both parties are well informed or well advised and acting in what they consider their own best interests; 3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. * This definition is from regulations published by federal regulatory agencies pursuant to Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) of 1989 between July 5, 1990, and August 24, 1990, by the Federal Reserve System (FRS), National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), and the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). This definition is also referenced in regulations jointly published by the OCC, OTS, FRS, and FDIC on June 7, 1994, and in the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines, dated October 27, 1994. The Scope of Work is the type and extent of research and analyses performed in an appraisal assignment that is required to produce credible assignment results, given the nature of the appraisal problem, the specific requirements of the intended user(s) and the intended use of the appraisal report. Reliance upon this report, regardless of how acquired, by any parry or for any use, other than those specified in this report by the Appraiser, is prohibited. The Opinion of Value that is the conclusion of this report is credible only within the context of the Scope of Work, Effective Date, the Date of Report, the Intended User(s), the Intended Use, the stated Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, any Hypothetical Conditions and/or Extraordinary Assumptions, and the Type of Value, as defined herein. The appraiser, appraisal firm, and related parties assume no obligation, liability, or accountability, and will not be responsible for any unauthorized use of this report or Its conclusions. Additional Comments (Scope of Work, Extraordinary Assumptions, Hypothetical Conditions, etc.): Extraordinary Assumption: Per the clients request I have based this appraisal on 'Before' and "After" valuation process. In the 'Before' case with an effective date of July 25, 20131 appraised this property as a 12.64 acre parcel with development potential. In the "After' case with an effective date of July 27, 20131 appraised this property as a 12.64 acre parcel with no development potential with the highest and best use being agricultural and or recreational use only. m LA N D Copydghl6 2007 by a la mode. Inc. This forth may be reproduced unmodified without wd0en permission, however. a la mode, inc. must be acknowledged and credited. Form OPLNDAD_LT -'TOTAL' appraisal software by a la mode, mc. -1.800-ALAMODE 3/2007 ..Main Fk N0.L112914 Pam#230141 Certifications r ■ p n " `--PI.N. a — 'a a a �lj�. 1111a PUJIII JP my uc �epmuuuu unmaomea wkmom wrmen permssim, mwever, a is mode. mc. must be acknawledged and credited. \� 1 r AN u Form GPLNDAD_LT - 70TAL' appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE 312007 rim n0.: Property Address: Jeurissen Rid a 0u8ots B and C Chanhassen Stale: MN Zip Code: 55317 Client: B Elmer Family Farms LLC__ Address: 19450 281st Street, Belle Plaine MN 56011 Appraiser. Nathan Haasken Address: 413 N Chestnut SheaChaska MN 55318 APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: - The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. - The credibility of this report, for the stated use by the stated user(s), of the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. - I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. - Unless otherwise indicated, I have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. - I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. - My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. - My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. - My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that were in effect at the time this report was prepared. - I did not base, either partially or completely, my analysis and/or the opinion of value in the appraisal report on the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin of either the prospective owners or occupants of the subject property, or of the present owners or occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the subject property. - Unless otherwise indicated, I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. - Unless otherwise indicated, no one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person(s) signing this certification. Additional Certifications: see attached Client Contact: Bruce Jeurissen _ _ Client Name: B Elmer Family Farms LLC _ E -Mail: Address: 19450 281st Street Belle Plaine MN 56011 APPRAISER SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (if required) or CO -APPRAISER (if applicable) F Appraiser Name: Nathan Haasken Surviso Cope -Appraiser z Company! — ---- - "— P Y Chestnut Realty Company: Phone: 1952) 448-3344 Fax:952 448 5310 E 0— y _ Phone: -- -Fax: -Mail: NHaasken(car7mail.com E -Mail: Date Report Signed: 0113112014 Gate Repo t Signed: License or Cedificabon #: 40041956 State: MN License or Ce t ficat on #: Designation: Certifled_Residential Appraiser Designation: Expiration Date of License or Certfication: 0_8/31/2015_ Expiration Date of License or Certification: Inspection of Subject: P I Did Inspect � Did Not Inspect (Desktop) Inspection of Subject Did Inspect ]Did Not Inspec! Date of Inspection: January19 2013 Date of Inspection: r ■ p n " `--PI.N. a — 'a a a �lj�. 1111a PUJIII JP my uc �epmuuuu unmaomea wkmom wrmen permssim, mwever, a is mode. mc. must be acknawledged and credited. \� 1 r AN u Form GPLNDAD_LT - 70TAL' appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE 312007 Main File No. L712914 LPa #24(941 bient7 B Elmer Family Farms LLC I Client File #: Subject Property: I Jeurissen Ridge Outlots B and C, Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 Appraisal File #: ILI 12914 This appraisal is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: This report is prepared using fors developed and copyrighted by the Appraisal Institute. However, the content, analyses, and opinions set forth in this report are the sole product of the appraiser. The Appraisal Institute is not liable for any of the content, analyses, or opinions set forth herein. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character or nature. No opinion is rendered as to title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. All existing liens, encumbrances, and assessments have been disregarded, unless otherwise noted, and the properly is appraised as though free and clear, having responsible ownership and competent management. 1 have examined the property described herein exclusively for the purposes of identification and description of the real property. The objective of our data collection is to develop an opinion of the highest and best use of the subject property and make meaningful comparisons in the valuation of the property. The appraiser's observations and reporting of the subject improvements are for the appraisal process and valuation purposes only and should not be considered as a warranty of any component of the property. This appraisal assumes (unless otherwise specifically stated) that the subject is structurally sound and all components are in working condition. • I will not be required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made an appraisal of the property in question, unless specific arrangements to do so have been made in advance, or as otherwise required by law. • I have noted in this appraisal report any significant adverse conditions (such as needed repairs, depreciation, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) discovered during the data collection process in performing the appraisal. Unless otherwise stated in this appraisal report, I have no knowledge of any hidden or unapparent physical deficiencies or adverse conditions of the property (such as, but not limited to, needed repairs, deterioration, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, adverse environmental conditions, etc.) that would make the property less valuable, and have assumed that there are no such conditions and make no guarantees or warranties, express or implied. I will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because I am not an expert in the field of environmental hazards, this appraisal report must not be considered as an environmental assessment of the property. I obtained the information, estimates, and opinions furnished by other parties and expressed in this appraisal report from reliable public and/or private sources that 1 believe to be true and correct. • I will not disclose the contents of this appraisal report except as provided for in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, and/or applicable federal, state or local laws. • The Client is the party or parties who engage an appraiser (by employment contract) in a specific assignment. A party receiving a copy of this report from the client does not, as a consequence, become a party to the appraiser -client relationship. Any person who receives a copy of this appraisal report as a consequence of disclosure requirements that apply to an appraiser's client, does not become an intended user of this report unless the client specifically identified them at the time of the assignment. The appraiser's written consent and approval must be obtained before this appraisal report can be conveyed by anyone to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media. • If this valuation conclusion is subject to satisfactory completion, repairs, or aiterations, it is assumed that the improvements will be completed competently and without significant deviation. X Market Value Definition (below) C Aftemate Value Definition (attached) MARKET VALUE is defined as the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. both parties are well informed or well advised and acting in what they consider their own best interests; 3. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal 5th ed., Appraisal Institute ,a„ai uiamure puensnes mis roan ror use Dy appraisers where the appraiser deems use of the form appropriate. Depending on the assignment, the appraiser may need to provide ad "ional data, analysis and work product not calletl for in this form. The Appraisal Institute plays no role in completing the form and disclaims any responsibility for the data, analysis or any other work product provided by the individual appraiser(s). AI Reports® AI -900.04 Certification, Assumptions and Limiting conditions © Appraisal Institute 2013, All Rights Reserved January 2013 Form A19004 -'TOTAL' appraisal software by a la mode, Inc. -1-800-A1 AMODE Main File No. L1 12914 I Page # 25 of 41 Clierd 8 Elmer Family Farms LLC Client File #: Subject Property: Jeudssen Ridge Outiots B and C, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Appraisal File #: ILl 12914 I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: • The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analysis, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the report assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, unbiased professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions. 1 have no present (unless specified below) or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no (unless specified below) personal interest with respect to the parties involved. • I have no bias with respect to any property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. • My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon the developing or reporting predetermined results. • My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. • My analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. • Individuals who have provided significant real property appraisal assistance are named below. The specific tasks performed by those named are outlined in the Scope of Work section of this report. C None ❑ Name(s) As previously identified in the Scope of Work section of this report, the signer($) of this report certify to the inspection of the property that is the subject of this report as follows: Property inspected by Appraiser ❑ Yes ❑ No Property inspected by Co -Appraiser ;] Yes C No • Services provided, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year Period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment: 6S None Specify services provided: Appraisal Institute Designated Member, Candidate for Designation, or Practicing Affiliate Certify: • The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute, which include the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. • The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. I am a Practicing Affiliate of the Appraisal Institute. As of the date of this report, I have completed the Standard and Ethics Education Requirements for Practicing Affiliates of the Appraisal Institute. APPRAISER: CO -APPRAISER: Signature �'l `�f Signature Name Nathan Haasken Name Report Date 01/31/2014 _ Report Date Trainee ❑ Licensed J Certified Residential Certified General L Trainee [ Licensed __J Certified Residential ] Certified General License # 40041956 _._,__...._ State MIN __ __.. — __ License # State Expiration Date 06/31/2015 Expiration Date unnrc. need to provide additional data, -analysis an work product not ca�le�for in thisform. The Appraisa0l Instituteplaysplays noorole inpcompletingethe dfiorm and discllaims any responsibility for the data, analysis or any other work product provided by the individual appraiser(s). At Reports® AI -900.04 Certification, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions @ Appraisal Institute 2013, All Rights Reserved January 2013 Form A19004 - *TOTAL, appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE Male PoeN0.012914 Pape # 26 of 41 BorrowerJeudssen Bruce-_._..._......—........_.._ RIe No. Lt 12914 — — ...---- - -- -------- -- — _.....--_...._ Properly Address Jeurissen Ridge OuUots 8 and C ii._ Chanhassen Cowl Carver State MN ZIP Code 55317 Lender/Client B Elmer FamilyFarms LLC APPRAISAL AND REPORT IDENTIFICATION This Report isDm of the following types: .r Appraisal Report (A written report prepared under Standards Rule 2-2(a) , pursuant to the Scope of Work, as disclosed elsewhere in this report.) x Restricted (A written report prepared under Standards Rule 2-2(b) , pursuant to the Scope of Work, as disclosed elsewhere in this report, Appraisal Report restricted to the stated intended use by the specified client or intended user.) Comments on Standards Rule 2-3 1 certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: - The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. - The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. Unless otherwise indicated, I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. Unless otherwise indicated, I have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or the parties involved with this assignment. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the aftainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. - My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that were in effect at the time this report was prepared. - Unless otherwise indicated, I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. - Unless otherwise indicated, no one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person(s) signing this certification (if there are exceptions, the name of each individual providing significant real property appraisal assistance is stated elsewhere in this report). Comments on Appraisal and Report Identification Note any USPAP related issues requiring disclosure and any State mandated requirements: APPRAISER: SUPERVISORY or CO -APPRAISER (if applicable): A(/ 1 Signature: _ Signature: - ------ -- ----- ante: Nathan Haasken Name: Certified Residential Appraiser State Certification #: 400419 State Certification #. or State License # __.._ or State License # State: MN Expiration Date of Certification or License. 08/31/2015 State: Expiration Date of Certification or License. Date of Signature and Report 01./31/2014Date of Signature: _ - -- Effective -- Date of Appraisal: Jul 25 2013 InspectionI ; None Irdedoi and Exterior J None _ ; Interior and Exterior Extericr-Only Dateof Inspection rf applicable): Ja 2013 -- Exterior -Only Date Inspection (if appl P licable): Nrm 11114 Li - ^TUTAL° appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE (9521448-3344 -i 1,19. . , — PRIVACY NOTICE Pursuant to the Gramm -Leach -Bliley Act of 1999, effective July 1, 2001, Appraisers, along with all providers of personal financial services are now required by federal law to inform their clients of the policies of the firm with regard to the privacy of client nonpublic personal information. As Professionals, we understand that your privacy is very important to you and are pleased to provide you with this information. Typ_CS Of NOnpUhll Dn cnn I information W oller•t In the course of performing appraisals, we may collect what is known as "nonpublic personal information" about you. This information is used to facilitate the services that we provide to you and may include the information provided to us by you directly or received by us from others with your authorization. Parties to Whom We Disclose information We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information obtained in the course of our engagement with our clients to nonaffiliated third parties, except as necessary or as required by law. By way of example, a necessary disclosure would be to our employees, and in certain situations, to unrelated third party consultants who need to know that information to assist us in Providing appraisal services to you. All of our employees and any third party consultants we employ are informed that any information they see as part of an appraisal assignment is to be maintained in strict confidence within the firm. A disclosure required by law would be a disclosure by us that is ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction with regard to a legal action to which you are a party. Confidentiality and Security We will retain records relating to professional services that we have provided to you for a reasonable time so that we are better able to assist you with your needs. In order to protect your nonpublic personal information from unauthorized access by third parties, we maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with our professional standards to insure the security and integrity of your information. Please feel free to call us any time if you have any questions about the confidentiality of the information that you provide to us. Form PRV - `TOTAL' appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE Main File No. L7 12914 Na f 28 0147 Easement Dedication - Page 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT JEURISSEN RIDGE ADDITION SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated JULY 22, 2013 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company (the "Owner"). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Owner has asked the City to approve a plat for JEURISSEN RIDGE ADDITION (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Owner enter into this Contract, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the plat. 3. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plan: Final plat approved JULY 22, 2013, prepared by Pioneer Engineering. 4. Notice. Required notices to the Owner shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Owner, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Owner by registered mail at the following address: B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC ATM: BRUCE JEURISSEN 19450 281 sr STREET BELLE PLAINE, MN 56011-5010 Phone: 952-873-6020 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Telephone: 952-227-1100 Form SCNLTR - °TOTAL" appraisal software by a la made, inc. - 1 -800-ALAMODE Main File No. L1 12914', Page # 29 of 41_ Easement Dedication - Page 2 5. Other Special Conditions. A. Dedicated access to Outlot A, Jeurissen Ridge Addition must be provided prior to recording the plat. B. The existing driveway access from CSAH No. 14 to the property shall henceforth be limited to use for agricultural purposes only to and from Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge Addition. A separate access easement across Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge Addition shall be recorded which shall follow the existing driveway alignment thereon, with a width of approximately 26 feet; this access easement will be vacated when an alternate access to Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge Addition is available. C. Unless the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements assessment, City Project 06-05, levied against the property described on Exhibit "A" is paid in full before the plat is recorded the assessment is reapportioned against Outlot A, Jeurissen Ridge Addition. As of lune 6, 2013, the assessment amount with accrued interest was $796,30231. D. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Development Contract, the Owner and City shall execute the preservation easement that is attached hereto as Exhibit B. E. Before any development plans are submitted for Outlot C the property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge Addition. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Development of Outlot C Jeurissen Ridge Addition would be inconsistent with the adopted Alternate Urban Area wide Review, AUAR. Any development would need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the 2005 AUAR. Form SCNLTR -'TOTAL' appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1 -800-ALAMODE Main File No. L7 12914 # 30 of 41 Easement Dedication - Page 3 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN M: Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor I zl�li Todd Gerhardt, City Manager B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC �.-- Bruce Jeq'tis en, Its Chief Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2013, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayer, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF(' E- ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .,LG�� day of 2013, Bruce Jeurissen, Chief Manager of B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, a Minne to Limited Liability Company, on behalf of the company. DRAFTED BY: NOTARY P WXZ City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 WROKJNEAMN Chanhassen, MN 55317 NMAy PU&X-MWW-S= (952) 227-1100 v�s�lalkn e�aea Jen,af,2otf Form SCNLTR - °TOTAL' appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-600-ALAMODE [-_Main Flk No, L7 12914-1 Papa #31 of 41 Easement Dedication - Page 4 EXIHBTT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota (referred to herein as Tract A). ALSO: Commencing at the southwest comer of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Section Line 30 feet thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 fat East of the Southwest comer of said Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest comer of said Section and place of beginning Be a threacomered piece in Southwest comer of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, ALSO: Beginning at the Southeast coma of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, North of Range 23 West; thence south along the quarter -quarter section line a distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14; thence cast along the north line of said Carver County Read No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the aforementioned 9uaroer-quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26, thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter -quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of beginning (referred to herein as Tract B). EXCEPT: that part of Tract A which lies Easterly of LINE 1 described below: LINE 1. Commencing at the north quarter comer of said Section 26; thence r n west on an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of said section 1634.23 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimmb of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence an an aziondh of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 478.28 feet; thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minute 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a point on the south lie of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarte and there terminating. and EXCEPT that part of Tract B which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of LINE 2 described below: LINE 2. Commencing at the point of termination of Line 1 described above; thence run east on an azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 seconds along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 556.16 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds for 448.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds for 323.97 fah thence on an azimuth of 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet; thence on an azimuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and the= terminating. Together with right of access retained in Quit Claim Dad Document No. 310751 pursuant to Access Driveway Permit dated August 26, 2012, Form SCNLTR - NOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc -1-800-ALAMODE Main File No. L1.12914_ __ Page # 32 of 411 Easement Dedication - Page 5 EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, is made this day of July, 2013, by B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Grantor's, for the benefit of the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"). The Grantor, in consideration of good and valuable consideration provided by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants the City a permanent easement (''Easement") for flowage and preservation and protection of wetlands, wetland buffer areas, steep slopes, woodlands and open spaces over, under, on and across the following land within the City of Chanhassen, County of Carver, State of Minnesota and legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" (the "Easement Property"). Grantor, its successors and assigns, hereby covenants and agrees as follows: The following are prohibited within the Easement Property, except as permitted by this Agreement, unless the Grantor obtains the consent of the City or a release of this Easement or portion thereof by the City. A. Constructing, installing, or maintaining anything made by man, including but not limited to buildings, structures, walkways, fences, fireplaces, clothes line poles, playground equipment, roads or hardcover of any nature whatsoever, except: 1) feeders, bird houses, and other devices intended to foster wildlife; and 2) a 26 foot wide driveway to be used solely to access Outlot C, Jeurissen Ridge Addition, from Pioneer trail, solely for agricultural purposes, which use must cease when Outlot C is no longer used for agricultural purposes or if an alternate access is provided to Outlot C. The driveway provided for in this section shall be maintained in its current condition and location, as provided in the depiction attached as Exhibit B. B. Cutting, mowing or removing shrubs or other vegetation, and cutting or removing trees, except for tree disease control by or as directed by a governmental agency Form SCNLTR -'TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1 -800-ALAMODE M ,. Main File No, Lt 12914 I Page # 33 of 41 Easement Dedication - Page 6 and except by special permit for maintenance or as part of an approved vegetation management plan. Grantors may remove brush, buckthorn, diseased or dead trees of any size, and noxious weeds. C. Except for maintenance of the driveway area referenced in Paragraph 1 A hereinabove, excavation or filling or material alteration of grade, including changes to the size, depth or contour of the wetland; dredging, mining or removal of earth, loam, peat, gravel, soil or any other natural material. D. Free roaming of domestic animals (i.e., horses, sheep, chickens, etc.). E. The deposit of waste, yard waste, or debris. F. Activity detrimental to the screening of the neighboring properties. G. Application of fertilizers, whether natural or chemical. H. Application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. 1. The application of herbicides, pesticides, and insecticides, except for noxious weed control by or as directed by a governmental agency. J. Outside storage of any kind. K. Activity detrimental to the preservation of the trees, slopes, scenic beauty, vegetation, and wildlife. 2. Grantor, its successors and assigns, further grants the City the affirmative right, but not the obligation to do the following on the easement premises: A. Subject to the driveway area referenced in Paragraph IA hereinabove, preserve, improve, and enhance the wetland, creek, buffer, trees, vegetation, and natural habitat by altering, clearing, and removing trees or other vegetation, by changing the contour of the land, by planting trees or other vegetation, and taking all appropriate actions to comply with federal, state, and local regulations related to wetlands, including the Bluff Creek Management Plan, the Bluff Creek TMDL and the Second General Surface Water Management Plan. B. Enter upon the easement premises at any time to enforce compliance with the terms of this instrument. Further, the City may enforce the terms of this Easement by any proceeding in law or in equity to restrain violation, to compel compliance, or to recover damages, including attorneys' fees and 171587r.2 2 Form SGNLTR - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE Mairkhle N.0.1. 1914 I :344141 Easement Dedication - Page 7 costs of the enforcement actions. Grantor is not liable for the actions of any third party, other than its employees, agents or contractors, which may violate the terms of this Easement, unless Grantor, its employees, agents or contractors had actual knowledge of the violation and failed to take reasonable action to stop the violation. 3. Failure to enforce any provision of this Easement upon a violation of it cannot be deemed a waiver of the right to do so as to that or any subsequent violation. 4. Invalidation of any of the terms of this Easement will in no way affect any of the other terms, which will remain in full force and effect. ('5.1 This Easement does not convey a right to the public use of the Easement Property nor it convey any right of possession in the Easement Property to the public or the City. Access by the City to the Easement Property is limited to access necessary for purposes of inspection and enforcement as specified in paragraph 2 above. The City is not be entitled to share in any award or other compensation given in connection with a condemnation or negotiated acquisition of all or any part of the Easement Property by any authority having the power of eminent domain. The City hereby waives any right it may have to such an award or compensation. The City acknowledges that Grantor and its successors and assigns shall be entitled to develop Outlot A in accordance with the Final Plat thereof approved by the City. 6. Acceptance of this Easement by the City and the recording of this document constitutes the City's consent to be bound by its terms. 7. This Easement runs with the Easement Property and be binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns, and inures to the benefit of the City, its successors and assigns. 8. This Easement may he amended or released on whole or in part upon consent of the City. 171iM.z 3 Form SCNLTR -'TOTAL^ appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE Main File No. L1 12914 Page # 35 of 41 Easement Dedication - Page 8 9. The City acknowledges that the Grantor's conveyance of the herein contained Easement constitutes a gift to the City, and the City agrees to sign the "Donee Acknowledgement" portion of Internal Revenue Service Form 8283, as soon as such Form has been completed and assigned by a licensed appraiser. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this instrument on the date first written above. t2rsa3v.2 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 4 Form SCNLTR -'TOTAL' appraisal software by a la node, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE Easement Dedication - Page 9 GRANTOR: B. ELMER FAMILY FARMS, LLC 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ 2013, by , the B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on its behalf. 171583..2 Notary Public 5 Form SCNLTR - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE Main File. No, L112914 Pale #36 0141 day of Of Easement Dedication - Page 10 GRANTEE: CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor M STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Main File No _L1 12914 I Page # 37 of 41 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2013, by Thomas A. Furlong and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 171583v-2 Notary Public Form SCNLTR - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE Main File No, L1 12914 ;_Page # 38 of 41 " Easement Dedication - Page 11 - Telephone: (651)452-5000 AMP 171583v.2 Form SCNLTR -'TOTAL° appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE Main Fle Na U1291-4 Page. # 39 of 41- " Easement Dedication - Page 12 EXHIBIT A Outlot B, Jeurissen Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. 171593v.2 Form SCNLTR -'TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE . 1r Main File Na L1 12914_ j Pale #.40 of 41-1 Appraiser Qualifications - Page 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA NATHAN H HAASKEN 413 N CHESTNUT STREET CHASKA, MN 55318 Department of Commerce The Undersigned COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE for the State of Minnesota hereby certifies that Nathan H Haasken 413 N CHESTNUT STREET CHASKA. MN 55318 has complied with the laws of the State of Minnesota and is hereby licensed to transact the business of Resident Appraiser : Certified Residential License Number: 40041956 unless this authority is suspended, revoked, or otherwise legally terminated. This license shall be in effect until August 31, 2015, IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this July 24, 2013. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE Minnesota Department of Commerce Licensing Division 85 7th Place East, Suite 500 SI. Paul, MN 55101-3165 Telephone: (651) 539-1599 Email: licensing,commerce@statemn.us us Website commerce.state.mn.us Notes: Continuing Education: QF R c it m nt Type Total -Appraiser USPAP 30.00 7.00 Continuing Education: 15 hours is required in the first renewal period, which includes a 7 hour USPAP course 30 hours is required for each subsequent renewal period which includes a 7 hour USPAP course. Appraisers: You must hold a licensed Residential. Certified Residential, or Certified General qualification in order to perform appraisals for federally -related transactions. Trainees do not qualify. For further details, please visit our website at wmmerce.stale. mn.us. Form SCNLTR -"TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE -62 _Ma n_Fle. Na,_L1 12974_I_Pa�e # 41 a191 Appraiser Qualifications - Page 2 Nathan Haasken Chestnut Realty — 413 N Chestnut Street —Chaska, MN 55318 - Certified Residential Appraiser— 952-448.4925 Education Saint John's University Collegeville, MN Graduated Spring 2005 Bachelor of Science Degree: Management with focus human resources Bachelor of Science Degree: English with focus in literature Prosource Educational Service, Inc. St. Paul, MN 2005 —2D07 Real Estate Licensing Classes and Continuing Education Kaplan Professional Schools St. Paul, MN 2007 — Present Appraisal Licensing passes and Continuing Education McKissock Warrant, Pennsylvania 2009 — Present Appraisal Upgrade Gasses and Continuing Education Licenses Minnesota Real Estate License License # RA -20511568 2005— Present Minnesota Resident Appraiser: Trainee License #4D041956 2007-2010 Minnesota Resident Appraiser: Certified Residential License #40041956 2010—Present Organizations Minnesota Area Association of Realtors 2006— Present National Association of Realtors 2006 - Present Practicing Affiliate of the Minnesota Appraisal Institute 2010 - Present Experience • Actively selling real estate in the state of Minnesota since 2005 • Owner and manager of numerous rental properties since 2004 • Actively appraising real estate in the state of Minnesota since 2007 • Assisted in numerous land development projects in Carver County, Minnesota • Experienced in condemnation proceedings in the state of Minnesota • Approved FHA appraiser for the state of Minnesota Form SCNLTR - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE