The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-08_CHICK-FIL-A- 445 WEST 79TH STREETNon -Scannable Item Item A,(Description _-- Folder Name (� i�i '�► Job Number Box Number (X) 21 i °i F Non -Scannable Item Item DescriDtion Folder Dumber Folder Nam® Job Number Box Number 0y Z � C' QO 0C y � myh h C�� N� 0 3 Vr ^� �`�' o ry �, � .� V U e g�0 Q ya+� �° Item Non -Scannable Item C I1,- -Golder Plumber Folder Flame - Job Plumber Box Plumber 00 �� r. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL HRGreen 420 North Front Street, Suite 100 McHenry, IL 60050 815.385.1778 To: City of Chanhassen Community Development Department Attn: Mr. Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints/Plans ❑ Specifications ❑ Reports Date: August 10, 2018 Job No. 86150413 Re: Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Store #03840 We are sending you the following items: ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ UPS Standard ® UPS Overnight ❑ Delivery ❑ Via ❑ Proposal ❑ CD ❑ Change Order N Bond Release Request Copies Date I Description 1 08-10-18 Bond Release Request Letter 1 12-18-17 Project As -Built Drawings ❑ For Approval ❑ For Review and Comment N For Your Use ❑ As Requested ❑ For Signature ❑ Returning to You N Other (See remarks) Remarks: Please find the enclosed the As -Built drawing and Bond Release letter in regards to the Chick-fil-A project. Once this request is processed, please release the Performance Bond to Chick-fil-A, Inc. at 5200 Buffington Road, Atlanta, GA 30349 and notify us when this action has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank You! Copies to: Signed: Joseph F. Vavrina, P.E. Project Manager Page 1 of 1 4. D420 North Front Street I Suite 1001 McHenry; IL 60050 > HRGREEN.COM Main °.15. 385. 1778 + Fax 815.385.1781 HRGreen August 10, 2018 City of Chanhassen Mr. Bob Generous Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Chick-fil-A— Chanhassen, MN Release of Performance Bond Permit#2016-08 HR Green Job No.: 8615041 Dear Mr. Generous: The purpose of this letter is to notify the City of Chanhassen that the Chick-fil-A project located at 445 W 791h Street is complete and the record drawings have been prepared and are attached for your records. With the receipt of the record drawings, please release the performance bond in the amount of $156,500.00. If there are any questions or additional information is needed, please contact me. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC. Todd Richards, P.E. Project Engineer II 1t7RiG7 HrgnYrnes\\lhigmhn Ss ata188150C1g\DesignlC Mitr-0 101& ty_ W Released ITo Do List Sqturday, September 30. 2017 Plan(2) 2017 .�... ........ ............. ...... ................... ........J..�...... ..I w1. ....2 T"s'4'5Ti..9T t 9 ib-fi-ij-fl A'6:*VT1'd 1-Yff'vl ls,14,Y6 il-ft'ili'lli 'M'Yi'O V Yz §VWNWIiUVWY!'ff'Yj. .'.3..A ,W:w,Ydiv N'x WY6 .k.Yi ............. . - Swurftles lftd Due S P CoMillory Description 9/3020I 7 10/4/2018 c Cash Escrow Chick-fil-A Site Plan Agreement 2016-08 L.atuiscaping, Erosion Control, Storm Sewer SAUfiAMW (RacejpI00322589) Sgo ifs Bob Generous 4/24/17 - Per Bob G. - Hold until Sept. 30. 2017 - Jenny 1111141117 - Status chock to Bob. - Jenny 12/15117. Per Stephanie - CIFA must submit revisions to their as-builts prior to miming their LAC. - Jenny 1/24/18 - Status Check to Bob. 3/8/18 - Status Check to Bob 4110/ 1 It - Per Bob- return S 151.078.00 retain 55,422.00 at 10% of landscape security until Oct. 2018 4110i 19 - gave to Beth W. to return escrow. Jenny 0rW1�wkpir10q utmmar taM aM S P-P" Pop i o2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. / / 11 I>- Right of Way of 79th Street West per the plat of FRONTIER DEVELOPMENT PARK WATT / WAT -WA7- / f� �AT Property Dies ption / 10' OF WAT - D - I / WA7 / � \ wArB�_- 1 �D Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; / \ D lo"PVC D ------- D 11 EXCEP77NG THEREFROM the following tract: PUG TUG s sarwa' i PUG �_ That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208E on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. /y j D eitamna ; 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. a• atad rl9nt o � � R 702 65 c �� d is i \\ P Access r rewa \I I E e SNMH g2 Y Publicly Rim v E = .950.92 431\ RU I c STORMWATM NOTES Inv S = 939.07 1 Uv WP1 Inv W = 943.1/\ \\ a, Olin / 15' Pine PUG `� � � 1 I O� STORMTRAP SYSTEM ELEVATIONS i WPt v / 20" Pine D / / / �11 I TOP OF STRUCTURE = 948'.00 947.94 \; g 1 UNDERSIDE OF ROOF = 947-58- 947.44 ent ADDIPONi ` / I _-- -- 11.07 OUTLET PIPE INVERT = 946-.89 945.95 WPt v G Utilityaf oR / / \ o GW y1PT�� 1\Ili SYSTEM INVERT = -94�50 942.44 / pu and let / / 3/4 £ 1 \ I BOTTOM OF CONCRETE PAD = J4$BO 941.94 t Sef PK Nai w { on t i / Trash Enclosure o D 1 11 - Found T/2 inch ODen Iran Ppe Cleanwt Rim = 951.35 i STORMTRAP SYSTEM INFORMATON WAr ABituminous surface \ \ /17- 7 TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME = 39,579 CF / Concrete surface d 4 4 0 . \ L- U / TOTAL SEDIMENTATON SURFACE AREA = 7,758 SF 1o0D LIVE VOLUME = 11,254 CF WAT--- _WAT i \ 8uild.n9k DEAD VOLUME = 28,325 CF E , Sanitary Sewer Ceanout Se arc NWL ELEVA77ON = 946.00 945.95 m \ per plan, no re/d veriried i c Drainage and Utility Easement per 100-YR HWL ELEVA77ON = 9472-E 947.16 Bituminous surface i Wpi \^ iiJ detail on the plat of ZAMOR ADDITION (14) \C Trench Drain 6+ DIP / Existing Budding \ \ Rim = 950,95 / i 6 1\ \ r x /5' Pinar \ Inv = 949.86 !/ Wpt \` `/ 'Ping \\ \ 11 \\ 5" Pine 954.27 Finish Floor Elevation \ 1 1 \ 1 \ a+ P/D 258900010 I S' P'^\�.�\r Owner HOLIDAY STATON STORES INC / \ I CB \ �' \ 1%a Found 1/2 inch Open Iron Pipe, p I Rim = 949.67 1 0 / / most cock 1, comer at Lot 2, \ t I I Open to StomntraP/ 1 � \ � Block 1, ZANOR AOD/OCv Rim950.50 I I Detention System 1 1 - inscribed peen Iron Pipe 64 \ \ \ ; RimInv_ 94240 1\ \ N Wi / '� 0.44 ' NE of computed corner 1 \ Existing Budding \ I l Bituminous surface I ® p \ \ �/ o \ a CJ,t �/ G South line of Lot 1, - Sign j 46 Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITON 949.71 Finish Flow Elevation t9.04 \ \ 1 l S n MH Rim = Retaining Wall \ p car VVV I 9 1.67 Inv NW = 9 .83 PUG �UG��--�- 1 / Inv SE = 94 32 11 G l PUG \\ I 1 r7,p5 / 51MH 1 \ NbxeJQ e04 `W f5L �`` I 1 950.55 \ \G I 1 Drainage and Utility Easement per ---�_ `� i In = 94244 st 11 �'r9 -� detail air the Plat of ZAMOR ADD/DON Sfwm Sewer Wet VWIt --- -'/ STUH `F,�o _ \ m = 950.89 (Stomntrop Detention System)\\ InvRiSE = 946.04 / \ INV N = 946.0 1 11 re sury� $ I San Cleaner l OW? / / Bituminous surface \ \ 83 ��i,Pm = 950.91 Drainage and Utility v �b /-- \ 49 4 G I -7 9' Locust i 7� fi d 1 44 - RIm NWgs s� •v \\\ detail on the plot \ec3 G1i''00�'\ 12" Plastic - 9�' 42 J P per Benchmark Top Nut Hydrant - / In \' of ZAMOR ADDITION i! h 0' 0 Elevation = 952.18 / 1 Inv C 10-0y \ r \ WP E 0 Westenylli-larch 2088 f Concretes lac Y Setback \ \ yc P WP \ "rr / f /� - San MH Y i D hh�t 1 1 Rim = cke \o �. ench Drain fi 1 r Roof \ / ' nv = /ocke Drainagenil Utdit 1 1 Oroin \- Roof m E anent per \ u ? \ Connate surface 1 1 i Q detail on the plat Roof pram -' / Locust N 7 \ ^/ r Roof � / . %/, Drain A/ � �� o) � I OR ADDI RON \\ LOT L IDrain DD I / ® ❑` Rim MH951.04 ,off v -r -"' /P o l Inv = lacked Q/ Crease i Trap r�� 25 ti QO / n 00 T ; �: V Sign �ryy P/D Existing28900022 1 Story Building /, �/ FpQ� �d`� crate surface P/D 258900030 \ [^_ / Address 445 79th Street West /s/gn / d`0 Ga^ Owner CHANHASSEN INN \ \ V� Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317 /� ' Building Foot Print Area = 4,848 sq. ft. Sign up0 CB - / \ / (' Finish Floor Elevation = 951.13 , / / \\ / je GaSC RIM = 9I8.69 V / // V / CB /_ Inv SW 6" PVC = 946.81 \ % Rim = 949.JJ Inv NE 8" PVC = 945.95 \ 1 / -+Inv SW 945.63 / � a+ Bituminous surface I\ .� �- m Concrete surface \ / / entCB \\ Rim = 94832 Eoe°l)ON pP Inv SW 6" PVC = 947.23 Inv NE 8' PVC = 94,93 \ v s " / RGP / PM�D /� \\ VD %R' Handrail -�\ / 12 Pot 1 \ ®µme eer Concrete su face ° fDp P / � g06 l Rim = 949.45 1� \ .`^,n ` / I Inv NE - 946. 28 f / R P1 6 I \ Inv NW - 9482 / / E�GEI 206 r� (\ u 1 1 Rim = 4827 \''' -'' 1 �/ D 62� 91 PUG FpP/ T P°(ce ^ Inv SW 6' PVC = 94726 i I / / \ I Inv NE 8" PVC - 48.27 ��' \\ \ SAW I/ �vn949.64 = 942.43 12" RCP 44 / / / Rf2 Q MND \ _ sr / atot 96 9q1'. 'F DD / Inv n North of MNDOT D / / Parcel 208E VCE1 T10N 4 ! Bituminous surface / / /® / surface MND T fJcrce/ 208E ° `o\ p cant°teot CB \ /- Trench DrainpeP^ri 10' ne Rim = 948.64 \ FES RCP 15' / \\ sotalat Na. Inv NE = 946.14 V \/ Inv SE = 94704 Inv - 945.91 15 D elk the kl f W^Y P Inv NW = 946.79 \\ Fes RGRA 66 \ Pub l `� SfdgW ntfal RdRigpt a cow tlan Found Copped Iron Pipe \ / Wall In ff�4 pP S Mstp1947261 \ ��_� ofsrra^sP a \ GB inscribed License No. 43933 �� / i 9 Inv ' Rim aev = 948.60- \\ .1 Inv W 12" RCP - 945.50 ^ / I\ ( I ' sign .\�f\ D 11t / \ �naPDp1P tneD � ZPµ \\ G p V FES RCP 18 \ \ /6(70 - Sic ak J JsJ Inv Elev = 945.66 ; PUG \\ Y NO. P NW SR/N 9A8'14,06 \ r Rim , 94;06 Inv 5 ' 9 944 57 Inv NE s N� of say / N aidt, n9nt t of say variable dedicated ri9n are blidy s sarW Pu 8itoaunoo m Ri Rm E7&v= 94776 18 / Inv W 18' RCP = 94376 / Inv S 24" RCP = 94J.66 Inv N 15' RCP = 944.2121 Westwood Phone (952) 937-5'150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 553" TolFree (888)937-5150 vllerrw00dp6.com VVctwood Prafedonal Servkl% Vtc Inv E 12 RCP = 944.Jf I hereby wctlfy Uut this plate " I I by She as codes my 11 eopervidw and do I r e duty Renaud LAND SURVEYOR under the tan of the Side offlljfinnworet%emsk, y� � /12,M8/2017 Revised City Stonnwoter Engineer.(CIAW) _ Craig W. Mons Dow 07A9M Liems No, 21 Qeer: JWF Prepared for. Clodkek hm Dllawal BTW Remtd��Ida wdale; o all v i C& I Rim E/ev = 949,80 Inv S 12' RCP = 946.60� Il pC DD PUG ~ CBMH Rim E/ev = 949.75 Inv NW 10" PVC = 946.70 Inv N 12" RCP = 946.45 Inv NE 12" RCP = 946.45 QC 0 0 % a c o o� �J a l� Il Il lV ,I �I Chick-fil-A SMW BuffingWrt Road Atlanta, Georgia, 30M Service Providers Traffic Eng4,eering, Sanitary Sewer i eater City of ChaMaesen Engineering Stephanie Smith 952-227-1165 7700 Markel Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 stem elotw City of Chanhassen Engineering Vaysso Strap 952-227-1168 700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 C anhossan. MN S5317 Gas Utility Oentspolnt Enepy chevfs Manson (612) 321-5435 Pectric xcei Energy Linda Madhemahl 952-470-3321 710 South Pine Street Woccnfa. MN 55837 Cableyintemet/VoIP Medlacom Stephen Jmes 952-239-7786 Troaitimd Telephone/lntemet CenturyLink Michael safsker 612-861-8781 MNDOT Right-ofWoy-Metro Divirkt Jon Lacho 952-607-6512 14500 March Drive State 1500 Eden Pr=7^ MN 55344 Notes 1) Subject property contains 57,588 sq. ft. or 1.322 acres. Property per Title Commitment area = 46,309 sq. ft. or 1.063 acres Proposed Property area = 11,279 sq. ft. or 0.259 acres 2) The site is currently zoned BH-Highway and Business Services District per Site Investigation Report by HR Green, dated December 16, 2015. Building setbacks: Front Lot Line = 25 feet Side Lot Line = 10 feet Rear Lot Line = 20 feet 3) Subject property contains 71 total parking stalls, including 3 handicapped stalls. 4) The bearings shown on this survey are based on the Carver County Coordinate System, N.A.D. 1983 (1986 adj), US Survey feet. Vertical datum is N.A.V.D. 1988, Benchmark used is Minnesota Department of Transportation control point ' 1002 AW 1", elevation of 959.12, not graphically shown. 5) Adjoining owners shown per Carver County parcel website. 6) The locations of observed utility service lines have been shown hereon. There may be additional utility service lines which are unknown and therefore not shown on this record drawing. Utilities service lines shown are based on proposed locations and existing as constructed structure. Sizes of utilities that are verifiable have been shown. 7) Field work for this survey was completed June 30, 2017 a BUSH/SHRUB STORM MANHOLE CONIFEROUS TREE ❑T TELEPHONE BOX DECIDUOUS TREE ®T TELEPHONE MANHOLE WETLAND ® 7RAMC CONTROL BOX 0 STEEL/WOOD POST ® HAND HOLE v SIGN-TRAFFIC/OTHER - TRAFFIC LIGHT -o--a- SIGN- TRAFFIC/07HER D4 GA7E VALVE F-1 MAIL BOX HYDRANT Lt, HANDICAPPED STALL WATER METER 9 PERC TEST ❑s CURB STOP BOX uw MONITORING WELL ®w WATER MANHOLE ® CABLE TV BOX Qw WELL GAS METER -10 FLAG POLE STREET L17E -cTv- CABLE TV GUY WIRE -GAS- GAS LINE 10, POWER POLE -PoH--- POWER OVERHEAD ELECTRIC BOX -pur- POWER UNDERGROUND ELEC77?1C METER -SAN- SANITARY SEWER ELEC7R/C MANHOLE -sio- STORM SEWER ® ELECTRIC TOWER -ToH- TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ®s SANITARY MANHOLE -TUG- TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND SEWER CLEANOUT -wAT- WA7ERMAIN ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN -roP- FIBER OP77C LINE ® CATCH BASIN - 0 - ACCESS CON7ROL ® FLARED END SEC77ON -x- FENCE LINE ® CULVERT- DECIDUOUS TREE LINE Q POST INDICATOR VALVE ' CONIFEROUS 7REE LINE FIRE DEPART. CONNECT V �I V CURB ill GUTTER o Denotes set %2"x14" Iron Pipe marked with Plastic Cap inscribed with Lic. No. 23021, unless otherwise noted. • Denotes Iron Monument Found as noted. Q Denotes Cast iron Monument VICINITY MAP Not to Sede Chick-fil-A FSU #03 Q Chanhassen, Ifinneaota X 0' 20' 40' 60' Date 07/19/17 Sheer 1 OF 1 Record Drawing Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M. Mattick John F. Kelly Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Shana N. Conklin Amy B. Schutt James J. Monge, III Jerome M. Porter Kurt S. Fischer Grand Oak Office Center 1 8h0 Blue Gentian Road Suite 290, Fagan, MN 55121 651-152-5C1,0 Fax h51-233-6237 www.ck-law.com CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association September 21, 2016 Bob Generous City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Recorded Documents / Chanhassen Shoppes / Chick-Fil-A Dear Mr. Generous: Please find enclosed copies of the following documents which have been recorded with Hennepin County on September 7, 2016: 1. Limited Warranty Deed between the City of Chanhassen and Chanhassen Shoppes recorded as Document No. A633285; 2. Declaration dated September 2, 2016 by Chanhassen Shoppes in favor of Riley Pugatory Bluff Creed Watershed District recorded as Document No. A633286; 3. Grant of Permanent Easement by Chanhassen Shoppes for drainage and utility purposes recorded as Document No. A633287; 4. Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Agreement recorded as Document No. A633288; 5. Encroachment Agreement between the City of Chanhassen and Chanhassen Shoppes recorded as Document No. A633289; and l Site Plan Agreement #2016-08 (Chick-Fil-A) recorded as Document No. A633290. Thank you. /jmo Enclosures Very truly yours, CAMPBELL E NUTSON ss la!Assoc* lvl. AZ Jean Olson, Legal As 189188vl 1c0-o2 Document No. A633290 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified Recorded on -September 07, 2016 2:10 PM Fee: $46.00 IIIIII I IIIIII1II III David Frischmon 633290 County Recorder CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT #2016-08 Chick-fil-A SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated September 2, 2016, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and CHICK-FIL-A, INC., a Georgia corporation, (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan ApprovaL The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for a 4,775 square foot, one-story building with a drive-thru and a variance for hard cover, plans prepared by HR Green, Inc. (referred to in this Permit as the "project") to be located on the property located in Carver County, Minnesota, legally described as provided in Exhibit B attached hereto (" Property'l. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A --Site Plan prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated 02/23116. Plan B--Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plans prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated 0223/16, Plan C—Landscaping Plan prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated 0223/16. Plan D — Plumbing Site Plan prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated 02/23/16 Plan E — Building Elevations prepared by Chipman Design Architecture, Inc. dated 04106/16. Plan F - Photometric Plan prepared by Chipman Design Architecture, Inc. dated 04106/16. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by July 30, 2017. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an w. Caere-�k- d— COmm:;rri:a I v si 200 SCC3I1 :<dl ; V SUYe 130 Sv I F'r-- Minneapc is. h':"t . -. extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall famish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $156,500.00 (erosion control, landscaping and storm sewer improvements). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said landscaping. PROCEDURES FOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Jason Hill Chick-fil-A, Inc. 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, GA 30349 (404)684-8530 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. City Council approves a site plan for a 4,775 square foot, one- story building with a drive-thru subject to the following conditions: Building a. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. b. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. d. Sanitary and storm sewer service must comply with Minnesota State Plumbing Code (see Table 701.1). e. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. f The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Engineering: 1. Several proposed items are shown within the city's drainage and utility easement, including: both retaining walls, clearance bar post for the drive-thru and the Chick-fil-A monument sign. These items must be moved out of the easement or the applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement concurrent with the site plan agreement. 2. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the two drainage basins located south of the parking lot. 3. The applicant's engineer shall also examine ways to mitigate the queueing and decreased Level of Service 4. The applicant shall re -stripe the intersection of W 79 h Street & Great Plains Boulevard to provide a longer left turn queue. 5. The applicant's engineer shall verify whether an adequate sight line is provided for vehicles exiting via the eastern site access prior to issuing a building permit. 6. The applicant shall follow the accessibility code for the construction as well as all applicable State and Federal laws. 7. The applicant shall coordinate with city staff prior to removal or construction of the services regarding inspection and traffic control on W 79 h Street. 8. Once construction is complete, the applicant shall retain ownership of the proposed sanitary service, water service and hydrant constructed on this property. Planning: 1. The applicant shall combine the two parcels identified in Exhibit B as one lot prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 3. Wall lighting and the trash enclosure lighting shall comply with city code. 4. The proposed monument sign shall be relocated on the site to comply with city code. 5. Signage shall comply with city code and requires separate sign permits for each sign. Landscaping: 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to accommodate more of the required bufferyard trees in the south and east buffer yard areas. 2. The interior width of all landscape islands must be a minimum of 10 feet. 3. The 8" oak tree located on plans along the southeast property line must be preserved. Revised landscape plans shall note the tree as saved. 4. The London plane -tree and Norway maple listed in the Plant Schedule shall be replaced with appropriate species from the city's Approved Tree List. Water Resources: 1. Sheet C-3.1 the two swales/basin areas shown on the southern property boundary shall be stabilized as soon as possible after going on-line but no more than 48 hours afterwards. 2. The Stormtech system shall be owned and maintained by the property owner. 3. A drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the Stormtech system and the two basins located south of the parking lot. 4. The design shall be modified to prevent the wall from experiencing inundation. In the event this is not possible, the drainage and utility easement shall clearly state that the retaining wall is the sole responsibility of the property owner. 5. The applicant shall prepare an operations and maintenance manual which shall include a schedule of inspection as well as anticipated routine maintenance to maintain performance of the storm water convenience and treatment system in perpetuity or until such a time as all parties agree it is no longer necessary. This document shall include persons responsible for inspections and maintenance and shall be recorded against the property. 6. The city or their representative shall be granted rights to come onto the property during and after construction of the site to inspect the facility. 7. Inspection reports and maintenance records regarding the storm water treatment system shall be made available to the City within 30 days of receiving a written request. 8. The applicant must evaluate the conveyance downstream to assure adequate capacity exists. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for all other agency permits such as MPCA, RPBCWD, MN DOT, MNDOT, et al. 10. The stormwater connection fees will be due at lot consolidation. The fee is $39,994.68. 6. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Denny ufenburger, Mayor AND: d Gerhardt, City Manager Chick-fil-A, Inc., a Georgia corporation DEVELOPER: BY: NAME: Jason Hill STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisday of AU44 SP , 2016, by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NrAj PUBLIC JENNIFER ANN POTTER STATE OF GEORGIA Nota Public -Minnesota ( ss. Mr ca'nm Fxw..,rn COUNTY OF FULTON ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this M day of 2016 by 0—cpn Rt 1 , the 5v.1�t .npr►tett of Chick-fil-A, h1c., a Georgia corporation DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boukva,d P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 �Y T"94" 0. �OT�r VA j �OL:�. 4.. CO �� CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on -site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severabiliri. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occuoancv. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall nun with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Construction activities in conjunction with new developments and city improvement projects, including but not limited to grading, utility installation and paving, requiring the use of heavy equipment shall be permitted between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on any weekday and 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No such activity is permitted on Sundays or public holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances. and Regulations. In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer finther agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Property: Parcel 1 PID: 258900020 Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following two tracts: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly comer of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. Parcel 2: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly comer of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. CONSENT The undersigned, being the fee owner of the property identified on Exhibit B of the foregoing SITE PLAN AGREEMENT #2016-08, for itself and its successors and assigns, hereby consents to the foregoing SITE PLAN AGREEMENT #2016-08. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused its duly authorized representative to execute this Consent as of this day of Sew 2016. CHANHASSEN SHOPPES, LLC, a Minnesota limit ' 'ij company VO4�j" ay M. Scot Its: Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss COUNTY OF to ) The foregoing in was acknowledged before me this � P. day ofAL/q ))SH 2016, by Jay M. Scott, the Chief Manager of CHANHASSEN SHOPPES, LLC, aWinnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said (Stamp) 10 MORTGAGEE'S CONSENT THIS MORTGAGEE'S CONSENT (the "Consent") is entered into by BRIDGEWATER BANK, a Minnesota banking corporation ("Lender"), as the holder of that certain Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing and Assignments of Leases and Rents dated February 4, 2015, and recorded with the Carver County Recorder's Office on February 5, 2015 as Document No. A605309 (the "Mortgage"), which Mortgage encumbers the property identified on Exhibit B of the foregoing SITE PLAN AGREEMENT #2016-08 (the "Site Plan Agreement") to which this Consent is attached. Lender does hereby consent to the execution and delivery of the Site Plan Agreement and hereby agrees that the Mortgage is and shall be subordinate to the rights created under the Site Plan Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF L nder has a ecuted this Consent under seal by its duly authorized representative as of the day of �' 2016. RI ANK \\�Ear a�� T1R11�...l■ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF *C V'NE-01n1 ) On s W day of W 9 2016, before me personally appeared PAA- kwlfan , the f Bridgewater Bank, a banking corporation, the person who is described herein and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that the such entity executed the same 0 ,4 44"" 1 & � Lary Public ASHLEY MARIE KEMPLIN-GAMM .x Notary Pubt-C 3 State of Mmnesota �fi My Commission Expires January 31 , 2018 VACANT LAND PURCHASE AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES. This Purchase Agreement is made on the j 11hday of k 201d by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipalpal corpo00 Market Boulevard, P. O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 ("Seller'), and CHANHASSEN SHOPPES, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, 9478 Riley Lake Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55347-3490 ("Buyer"). 2. OFFER/ACCEPTANCE. Buyer offers to purchase and Seller agrees to sell the following the real property located in Carver County, Minnesota, described on the Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Property"). 3. PRICE AND TERMS. The purchase price for the Property included under this Purchase Agreement is approximately Thirty-six Thousand Ninety-nine and 20/100 Dollars ($36,099.20). The final purchase price shall be $3.20/square foot as determined by an ALTA survey obtained by Buyer in accordance with the terms of this Agreement ("Purchase Price"). If the total square footage of the Property is greater or less than 11,281 square feet, the Purchase Price shall be adjusted accordingly. The purchase price shall be payable as follows: A. Earnest Money. $1,000.00 as earnest money ("Earnest Money") which Earnest Money shall be held by Commercial Partners Title in an interest -bearing trust account ("Title Company') in accordance with the Escrow Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit B. All Earnest Money shall be: (i) distributed to Seller at the time of closing to be applied to the Purchase Price; (ii) distributed to Seller as liquidated damages and as Seller's sole remedy, in the event Seller performs all of its obligations under this Agreement and Buyer fails to close as required in this Agreement. The Earnest Money will be returned to the Buyer in the event of (i) refusal of the Seller to perform its obligations under this Agreement; or (ii) Buyer's termination of this Agreement under Paragraph 20.A. as hereinafter set forth. Buyer's sole remedies if Seller refuses to perform its obligations shall be to have the Earnest Money returned or commence an action for specific performance within 30 days of Seller's default. B. Balance of Purchase Price. The balance of Purchase Price in cash or by wire transfer of U.S. Federal Funds on the Closing Date as hereinafter defined. 4. DEED/MARKETABLE TITLE. Upon performance by Buyer, Seller shall execute and deliver to Buyer a Limited Warranty Deed, conveying good and marketable title of record, subject to: A, Reservations of minerals or mineral rights by the State of Minnesota, if any; B. Building and zoning laws, ordinances, state and federal regulations; and r:K;S :tF7 C. The lien of real property taxes and the lien of special assessments and interest due thereon, if any, payable in the year of closing which by the terms of this Purchase Agreement are to be paid or assumed by the Buyer. D. Any encumbrances shown on the title commitment to which Buyer has not objected to prior to the expiration of the twenty (20) day period provided under Section 9 of this Agreement ("Permitted Encumbrances"). 5. REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. A. Prior Years' Delinquent Real Estate Taxes and Delinquent Special Assessments. Delinquent real estate taxes payable in years prior to the year of Closing and delinquent installments of special assessments certified for collection with real estate taxes payable in years prior to the year of Closing, together with penalty, interest and costs, shall be paid by Seller not later than the Date of Closing. B. Real Estate Taxes Payable in the Year of Closing. Real estate taxes payable in the year of Closing shall be prorated between Seller and Buyer on a calendar year basis to the Date of Closing. Buyer shall assume installments not paid at Closing. Seller shall pay penalty, interest and costs on any delinquent installment of taxes and special assessments payable by Seller in the year of Closing. Seller represents and warrants that there are no pending, levied or deferred special assessments on the Property. C. Deferred Real Estate Taxes. Seller shall pay on Date of Closing or provide for payment of any deferred real estate taxes (including "Green Acres" taxes under Minn. Stat. § 273.111) payment of which is required as a result of the Closing of this sale and the recording of the Deed. Provision for payment shall be by payment into escrow of 1.5 times the estimated payoff amount of the deferred taxes. D. Certified Special Assessments. All installments of special assessments certified for payment with the real estate taxes payable in the year of Closing shall be paid by Seller at Closing. E. Pending Special Assessments. Seller shall provide for payment of special assessments pending as of the date of this Purchase Agreement for improvements that have been ordered by the City Council or other governmental authorities. Seller's provision for payment shall be by payment into escrow of 1.5 times the estimated amount of the assessments. If a special assessment becomes pending after the date of this Purchase Agreement and before the Date of Closing, Buyer may, at Buyer's option: (1) Assume payment of the pending special assessment without adjustment to the purchase price of the real property; or (2) Require Seller to pay the pending special assessment (or escrow for payment of same as provided above) and Buyer shall pay a commensurate increase in 1 s2csM 2 the purchase price of the real property, which increase shall be the same as the estimated amount of the assessment; or (3) Rescind this Agreement, in which case all Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer. F. All Other Levied Special Assessments. Seller shall pay on the Date of Closing all other special assessments levied as of the date of this Purchase Agreement. 6. SELLER'S BOUNDARY LINE, ACCESS, RESTRICTIONS AND LIEN WARRANTIES. Seller warrants that buildings are entirely within the boundary lines of the Property. Seller warrants that there has been no labor or material famished to the Property for Seller for which payment has not been made. Seller warrants that there are no present violations of any restrictions relating to the use or improvement of the Property. Seller warrants that the Property is not subject to a lien for Medical Assistance or other public assistance. 7. ACCESS PRIOR TO CLOSING. Upon reasonable notice to Seller, Buyer and Buyer's authorized agents as well as Chick-Fil- A, Inc ("CFA") and its authorized agents shall have the right during the period from the date of this Agreement to the Date of Closing to enter in and upon the Property in order to make, at Buyer's or CFA's expense, surveys, measurements, soil tests and other tests that Buyer or CIA shall deem necessary. Buyer agrees to restore any resulting damage to the Property and to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Seller from any and all claims by third persons of any nature whatsoever arising from Buyer's right of entry hereunder, including all actions, proceedings, demands, assessments, costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. No invasive testing of the Property shall be performed without Seller's prior written consent. Seller's consent may be conditioned upon any restrictions that Seller deems necessary. Buyer shall provide to Seller a copy of any such surveys, measurements, soil tests or other tests that Buyer or CFA obtain within five (5) days after receipt. 8. POSSESSION. Seller shall deliver possession of the Property not later than the actual date of closing. 9. TITLE INSURANCE. Within fifteen (15) days following the date of this Agreement, Seller, at its expense, shall furnish a title insurance commitment in the full amount of the Purchase Price issued by Land Title, Inc. ("Title Company"), certified to date to include proper searches covering bankruptcies, state and federal judgments and liens, by which said company commits to issue its policy of title insurance that insures that at closing Buyer shall have good, marketable and insurable title of record to the Premises. Buyer shall be allowed twenty (20) business days after receipt of the title commitment and land survey for examination of title and making any objections, which shall be made in writing or deemed waived. 10. TITLE CORRECTIONS AND REMEDIES. Seller shall have twenty (20) business days from receipt of Buyer's written title objections to notify Buyer of Seller's intention to make title marketable within (90) days from Seller's receipt of such written objections. If notice is given, payments hereunder required shall be postponed pending correction of title, but upon correction of title within ten (10) days after written notice to Buyer, the parties shall perform the 182668v8 Agreement according to its terms. If no such notice is given, or if notice is given but title is not corrected within the time provided for, this Agreement shall be null and void, at the option of Buyer, and in such case, neither party shall be liable for damages hereunder to the other, unless Buyer notifies Seller in writing of Buyer's waiver of the uncured title objections within five (5) business days from the end of the twenty (20) day business day period. 11. NOTICES. All notices required herein shall be in writing and delivered personally or mailed to the address as shown at Paragraph 1, above and if mailed, are effective as of the date of mailing. 12. MINNESOTA LAW. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 13. WELL DISCLOSURE. [Check one of the following:] XX Seller certifies that Seller does not know of any wells on the Property. Wells on the Property are disclosed by Seller on the attached Well Disclosure form. 14. DISCLOSURE OF INDIVIDUAL ON -SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM. [Check one of thefollowing.-] XX Seller certifies that Seller does not know of any individual on -site sewage treatment systems on the Property. _ Individual on -site sewage treatment systems on the Property are disclosed by Seller on the attached Disclosure form. 15. SELLER'S COVENANTS, REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. A. Seller, as part of the consideration therefore, represents warrants, and covenants with Buyer and its successors and assigns that: (1) Seller has the present full authority and power to execute this Agreement and to close the sale of the Property. (2) That Seller has not received notice of (a) any actual or pending litigation or proceeding by any organization, person, individual or governmental agency against Seller with respect to the Property or against the Property, (b) any violation of the Property's compliance with applicable fire safety laws, building code ordinances, zoning ordinances or any similar statutes, ordinances, laws, rules or regulations, (c) any condition, defect or inadequacy which, if not corrected, would result in the termination of, or increase in the cost of, insurance coverage, (d) any proceedings which could cause the change, redefinition or other modification of the zoning classifications or of other legal requirements applicable to the Property or any part thereof, or (e) any pending or threatened condemnation proceeding that would affect the Property. is2vssvg (3) Except as set forth in Section 9, on the Date of Closing there will be no (a) outstanding leases or occupancy agreements, or (b) outstanding contracts made by Seller for any improvements to the Property which have not been fully paid for or for which Seller shall make arrangements to pay off except such contracts as shall be agreed upon by Seller and Buyer for improvements to the Property and Seller shall cause to be discharged all mechanic's or materialmen's liens arising from any labor or materials furnished to the Property prior to the Date of Closing. (4) Seller will not, without the prior written consent of Buyer: (a) construct or enter into any agreement or commitment to construct any improvement or alteration to the Property; or (b) enter into or consent to any lease, easement, covenant or other obligation affecting the Property or alteration to the Property except as provided herein. (5) Seller shall deliver to Buyer a written notice of the commencement of any legal action by any governmental authority or third party affecting the Property and will make no concessions or settlements with respect to any such action without Buyer's prior written consent. (6) Seller is not a foreign person, as such term is defined in Section 1445(f)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and shall deliver an affidavit to that effect at closing, which shall be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Buyer. B. All of Seller's covenants, representations and warranties in this Agreement shall be true as of the date hereof and of the Closing Date, and shall survive closing for a period of six (6) months and shall he a condition precedent to the performance of Buyer's obligations hereunder. C. PROTECTED HISTORICAL SITES. [Select either (1) or (2) belaw. j X Seller represents that Seller does not know if there are historical, native American, or archeological materials on or in the property that might be protected by law. _ Seller represents that the property does not have any American Indian burial grounds, other human burial grounds, ceremonial earthworks, historical materials, and/or other archeological sites that are protected by federal or state law. Buyer's obligation to close is contingent upon Buyer determining to Buyer's satisfaction that the Property does not have any American Indian burial grounds, other human burial grounds, ceremonial earthworks, historical materials, and/or other archeological sites that are protected by federal or state law. 182668v8 16. SELLER'S AFFIDAVIT. At closing, Seller shall supplement the warranties and representations in this Purchase Agreement by executing and delivering a Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blank [Form No. I I6-M, I I7-M, or I I8-M] Affidavit of Seller. 17. CLOSING. The closing (the "Closing") of the purchase and sale contemplated by this Agreement shall occur at a location designated by Buyer, and shall occur within five (5) days after written notice from Buyer, but in no event later than thirty (30) days after CFA has waived all of its contingencies under the Ground Lease between CFA and Buyer (the "Ground Lease"), including, without limitation Site Plan, Preliminary and Final Plat and receipt of all approvals for CFA to construct and operate a Chick-Fil-A restaurant on the Property and Buyer's adjacent property ("Closing Date"). The foregoing notwithstanding, in no event will the Closing Date be later than September 15, 2016. At Closing, Seller and Buyer shall disclose their Social Security Numbers or Federal Tax Identification Numbers for the purposes of completing state and federal tax forms. 18. CLOSING DOCUMENTS. A. At the Closing, Seller shall execute and/or deliver to Buyer the following (collectively the "Closing Documents"): (1) Limited Warranty Deed. A Limited Warranty Deed in recordable form and reasonably satisfactory to Buyer, which shall include the following well representations: "Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described Property." (2) Seller's Affidavit. A standard form affidavit by Seller indicating that on the date of Closing there are no outstanding, unsatisfied judgments, tax liens or bankruptcies against or involving Seller or the Property; that there has been no skill, labor or material furnished to the Property for which payment has not been made or for which mechanic's liens could be filed; and that there are no other unrecorded interests in the Property. (3) Non -Foreign Person Certification. A certification in form and content satisfactory to the parties hereto and their counsel, properly executed by Seller, containing such information as shall be required by the Internal Revenue Code, and the regulations issued there under, in order to establish that Seller is not a "foreign person" as defined in §1445(f)(3) of such Code and such regulations. (4) Storage Tanks. If required, an affidavit with respect to storage tanks pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 116.48, (5) Well Certificate. If there is a well located on the Property, a well disclosure certificate in form and substance true to form for recording. 182rs8v8 (6) Certification. A certification that the representations and/or warranties made by Seller is materially the same as were in existence on the date of this Agreement or noting any changes thereto; and (7) Other Documents. All other documents reasonably determined by either party or the title insurance company to be necessary to transfer and provide title insurance for the Property. B. At the Closing, Buyer shall execute and deliver to Seller the following: (1) All documents reasonably determined by either party or the title insurance company to be necessary to provide title insurance for the Property; (2) Payment of the Purchase Price. 19. CLOSING COSTS. The costs relating to the closing of this transaction shall be paid as follows: A. Buyer shall pay: (1) Recording fee for the Limited Warranty Deed; (2) One-half of the closing fee charged by the Title Company; (3) The premium for owner's title insurance, including survey coverage; and (4) All costs for preparation of an ALTA survey. B. Seller shall pay: (1) All costs of obtaining a title insurance commitment; (2) State deed tax; (3) One-half of the closing fee charged by the Title Company; and (4) Conservation fee attributable to the Limited Warranty Deed 20. ADDITIONAL TERMS. A. Buyer's Contingencies. Buyer's obligations under this Agreement are contingent upon the following ("Buyer's Contingencies") expressly contingent upon Buyer's satisfaction with each of the following prior to Closing: (1) The representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement must be true as of the date of this Agreement and on the Closing Date, and Seller ia266M 7 shall have delivered to Buyers at Closing a certificate dated the Closing Date, signed by Seller, certifying that such representations and warranties are true as of the Closing Date. (2) Buyer determining on or before the Closing Date, that it is satisfied, in its sole discretion, with Buyer's physical inspection of the Property, including, without limitation, the results of matters disclosed by a Phase I Environmental Audit or by any environmental/engineering investigation or testing of the Property performed by Buyer or Buyer's agent. By executing this Agreement, Seller hereby authorizes Buyer to enter upon the Property at reasonable tunes to conduct the investigations and/or tests described herein. Buyer shall be solely responsible for all environmental tests and shall hold Seller harmless from any such costs and shall indemnify Seller for breach of this provision including reasonable attorneys' fees. (3) Receipt of all approvals required by CFA for the construction and operation of a Chick-Fil-A restaurant on the Property and the Buyer's adjacent property, including, without limitation site plan, vacation of appropriate drainage and utility easements, the combination of the Property with Buyer's adjacent lot and execution of a Site Plan Agreement (as set forth in B(1) and (2) below, respectively) all in Buyer's and CFA's sole discretion. Seller and Buyer agree that the transaction contemplated herein is contingent upon the performance or resolution of the contingencies contained in this Section. In the event any of the Contingencies have not been satisfied or waived, in the sole and absolute judgment of Buyer by the Closing Date ("Contingency Period"), the Buyer may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to the Seller. The Contingencies are for the sole benefit of the Buyer and the Buyer shall have the right to waive any or all of the Buyer Contingencies by written notice to the Seller. Termination of this Agreement by Buyer as a result of any of the Contingencies not being satisfied shall result in both parties hereto being relieved of any further rights, responsibilities or obligations hereunder other than the return of the Earnest Money to Buyer. Upon Termination of this Agreement by Buyer, Buyer shall execute a Quit Claim Deed of the Property to the Seller terminating Buyer's interest in this Purchase Agreement. B. Seller's Contingencies. Seller's obligations under this Agreement are contingent upon the following ("Seller's Contingencies") expressly contingent upon Seller's satisfaction with each of the following prior to Closing: (1) Buyer combining the Property with Buyer's abutting property identified as PID No. 258900020 ("Buyer's Parcel") under a single tax parcel at Closing; (2) Receipt of all approvals required by CFA for the construction and operation of a Chick-Fil-A restaurant on the Property and the Buyer's adjacent property, including, without limitation site plan, vacation of ls266svg appropriate drainage and utility easements, the combination of the Property with Buyer's adjacent lot and execution of a Site Plan Agreement (as set forth in B(1); and (3) Buyer obtaining an ALTA survey of the Property. Seller and Buyer agree that the transaction contemplated herein is contingent upon the performance or resolution of the contingencies contained in this Section. In the event any of the Contingencies have not been satisfied or waived, in the sole and absolute judgment of Seller by Closing, the Seller may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to the Buyer. The Contingencies are for the sole benefit of the Seller and the Seller shall have the right to waive any or all of the Seller Contingencies by written notice to the Buyer. Termination of this Agreement by Seller as a result of any of the Contingencies not being satisfied shall result in both parties hereto being relieved of any further rights, responsibilities or obligations hereunder other than the return of the Earnest Money to Buyer. Upon Termination of this Agreement b by Seller, Buyer shall execute a Quit Claim Deed of the Property to the Seller terminating Buyer's interest in this Purchase Agreement. C. "AS IS" Purchase. Except as set forth in this Purchase Agreement or any document contemplated hereby, (i) the Property is being sold, conveyed, assigned, transferred and delivered "as is, where is" on the date hereof, and in its condition on the date hereof, "with all faults," and Seller is not making, and expressly disclaims, any other representation or warranties written or oral, statutory, express or implied, concerning the Property, including but not limited to, representations or warranties relating to value or quality of the Property or with respect to this Purchase Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby, and (ii) Seller specifically disclaims any representation or warranty of merchantability, usage, suitability or fitness for any particular purpose with respect to the Property or any part thereof, or as to the workmanship thereof, or the absence of any defects therein, whether latent or patent. 21. ADDENDA. Attached are no addenda which are made a part of this Purchase Agreement. 22. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for all provisions of this Purchase Agreement. 23. MULTH'LE ORIGINALS. Seller and Buyer have signed two (2) originals of this Purchase Agreement. rg266gvg 9 The City agrees to sell the Property for the price and terms and conditions set forth above. SELLER: CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Denny Laufeenburger, is And: AdZ , Its City t ffi66M 10 Dated: / - //— /6 , The Buyer agrees to buy the Property for the price and terms and conditions set forth above. BUYER: CHANHASSEN SHOPPES, LLC By. ay M. Sc tt Its Chief Manager 192668`'s 11 Dated: Deiu*k.- 112015 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly comer of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. 182668v8 12 ESCROW AGREEMENT The undersigned, Commercial Partners Title ("Escrow Agent") acknowledges receipt of One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) (the "Deposit") to be held by it pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement attached to this Escrow Agreement. Escrow Agent agrees to hold the Deposit in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement and disburse the same strictly in accordance with such terms. Escrow Agent shall invest the Deposit in such interest -bearing accounts or instruments as shall be approved by both the Buyer and the Seller. Interest shall accrue for the benefit of Buyer and shall become part of the Earnest Money. Seller represents that its Tax I.D. Number is as follows: 41-0885331. Buyer represents that its Tax I.D. Number is as follows: 47-2624717. The sole duties of Escrow Agent shall be those described herein, and Escrow Agent shall be under no obligation to determine whether the other parties hereto are complying with any requirements of law or the terms and conditions of any other agreements among said parties. Escrow Agent may conclusively rely upon and shall be protected in acting upon any notice, consent, order or other document believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper party or parties. Escrow Agent shall have no duty or liability to verify any such notice, consent, order or other document, and its sole responsibility shall be to act as expressly set forth in this Agreement. Escrow Agent shall be under no obligation to institute or defend any action, suit or proceeding in connection with this Agreement unless first indemnified to its satisfaction. Escrow Agent may consult with respect to any question arising under this Agreement and shall not be liable for any action taken or omitted in good faith upon advice of such counsel. The fees and charges of the Escrow Agent shall be paid as follows: one-half of such fees and charges shall be paid by Seller and one-half of such fees and charges shall be paid by Buyer. 1� . __q ESCROW AGENT: COMMERCIAL PARTNERS TITLE LE 1826684 13 Dated: ; - // - / 4, Dated: SELLER: CITY OF C ASS N By: T d Ger ts: City Manager BUYER: CHANHASSEN SHOPPES C ay M. ott Its: Chief Manager i 82668v8 14 M.wee� 8..b AwHen W-V -_ M. NQ7 L LOT 7 a \ 17 r Al ND 5 � `ter•_ •_.. 3tP� A�.' att-ip� Ly-d ,.... �.. r... ,✓.. .___ .._,inn. w....•r mn^n.,w�"r„�..:.w a,.�:�✓..r..r�m�w: n�;m ., ,.... Q sr xs^.. - - _ � �//', � 1 �I II a w.��...�. <«� _ .,.�.. r<..,✓.. +...,n o ....evr ....<r 1� y' 9'' ___ Y �,( w%/'� �f� j�l� �w�..�.�..r�✓. �:w �.. w..r. •a mn � nu '- fn ✓yam^Y I`I♦ 1 a ar�M.�A mfm.rt<r �rrn�i.siR �ra��"'i'� �� :I / ^'nJ✓��(`f�'iJ' e �/i.. '� _ o y�umio"'"I✓:a..�ie�I.`"".o:'`.r:.n..r,"<vlel ir.�,.,5 sn� m...e�..r, ..n jeiir" ni�;JJ T .��. ,ur_.._...,.. ✓<n.�.✓w+-+..._....n ,a ,.r �.Y.rr ,ter, ��-� HR Green, Inc Chick-fil-A ALTA/AGSM l d Title Survey 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.2271180 Fax:952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:952.227.1140 Fax 952.227.1110 Paris i6 Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 July 25, 2016 Mr. Jason Hill Chick-fil-A Inc. 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, GA 30349 Re: Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, Planning Case 42016-08 Dear Mr. Hill, Enclosed is the site plan agreement for the Chick-Fil-A restaurant which was approved for development in Chanhassen on May 9, 2016 by the City Council and incorporates the conditions of approval for the site plan. The site plan agreement must be executed by Chick-fil-A, Inc. and the City of Chanhassen prior to the closing on the property being purchased from the city, which is scheduled for mid -August. This agreement must be recorded at Carver County within 120 days of the approval (by September 6, 2016) and prior to the issuance of a building permit. The required security of $156,500.00 shall be submitted to the city in conjunction with the site plan agreement. A separate building permit application and review is required. I have also included an application to combine real estate parcels which must be signed by Chick-Fil-A and returned with the agreement. This document will be submitted with the deed to combine the two parcels. Fax: 952.2271110 If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at Recreation Center benerous(&—ci.chanhassen.mn.us or (952) 227-1131. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Sin Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Robert Generous, AICP Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Senior Planner Public Works Enclosures 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Fax: 952.227.1310 Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Senior Center Jerry Mohn, Building Official Phone: 11 Andrea McDowell Poehler, Attorney Fax:952 Fax:9522227.2271170 Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist Website Stephanie Smith, Project Engineer www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Date Received CARVER COUNTY Taxpayer Services Department Government Center- Administration Building 600 East 4th Street Chaska, MN 55318-2102 �nr Phone (952) 361-1910 Fax(952)361-1919 Application to Combine Real Estate Parcels Per MN Statute 272.46 the county auditor, upon written application of any person, shall for property tax purposes only, combine legal descriptions of contiguous parcels to which the applicant(s) hold title. In order to be combined, the following requirements must be met: • Receipt of completed form by owner or designated representative • Based upon deeds of record, parcels must be of the same (identical) ownership • Parcels must be contiguous • Parcels must be located in same unique taxing districts (TAG) • Current year and delinquent taxes must be paid on each parcel • If parcels are in a Tax Increment Financing District (TIF), they must be located in the same TIF district • If special assessments are not paid on all parcels, the city/township would need to recertify the special assessments for the new parcel CAUTION Parcels that have been combined cannot be subdivided again without local municipality approval. If located in a township, Carver County Land Management Office must also approve the subdivision. Combined property tax will be reflected on next year's tax statement Owner (Applicant) Name: Address: Parcels to be combined: 2-15$9060Zo Phone Number: 251M 000 2-) Signature: Date: For Office Use Only: Approved Denied By: Reason Denied: G:\PLAN\Forrns\Administrative Subdivisions\Administrative subdivision Application to Combine Real Estate Parcels.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT #2016-08 Chick-fil-A SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated May 9, 2016, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and Chick-fil-A, Inc. (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for a 4,775 square foot, one-story building with a drive-thru and a variance for hard cover, plans prepared by HR Green, Inc. (referred to in this Permit as the "project") to be located on the property located in Carver County, Minnesota, legally described as provided in Exhibit B attached hereto ("Property"). 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Permit and finish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A --Site Plan prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated 02/23/16. Plan B---Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plans prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated 02/23/16. Plan C--Landscaping Plan prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated 02/23/16. Plan D — Plumbing Site Plan prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated 02/23/16 Plan E — Building Elevations prepared by Chipman Design Architecture, hic. dated 04/06/16. Plan F - Photometric Plan prepared by Chipman Design Architecture, Inc. dated 04/06/16. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by July 30, 2017. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $156,500.00 (erosion control, landscaping and storm sewer improvements). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said landscaping. PROCEDURESFOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Chick-M-A, Inc. 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, GA 30349 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. City Council approves a site plan for a 4,775 square foot, one- story building with a drive-thru subject to the following conditions: Building: a. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. b. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. d. Sanitary and storm sewer service must comply with Minnesota State Plumbing Code (see Table 701.1). 2 e. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. f. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Engineering: 1. Several proposed items are shown within the city's drainage and utility easement, including: both retaining walls, clearance bar post for the drive-thru and the Chick-fil-A monument sign. These items must be moved out of the easement or the applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement concurrent with the site plan agreement. 2. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the two drainage basins located south of the parking lot. 3. The applicant's engineer shall also examine ways to mitigate the queueing and decreased Level of Service 4. The applicant shall re -stripe the intersection of W 79`h Street & Great Plains Boulevard to provide a longer left turn queue. 5. The applicant's engineer shall verify whether an adequate sight line is provided for vehicles exiting via the eastern site access prior to issuing a building permit. 6. The applicant shall follow the accessibility code for the construction as well as all applicable State and Federal laws. 7. The applicant shall coordinate with city staff prior to removal or construction of the services regarding inspection and traffic control on W 79a' Street. 8. Once construction is complete, the applicant shall retain ownership of the proposed sanitary service, water service and hydrant constructed on this property. Planning: 1. The applicant shall combine the two parcels identified in Exhibit B as one lot prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 3. Wall lighting and the trash enclosure lighting shall comply with city code. 4. The proposed monument sign shall be relocated on the site to comply with city code. 5. Signage shall comply with city code and requires separate sign permits for each sign. Landscaping: 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to accommodate more of the required bufferyard trees in the south and east buffer yard areas. 2. The interior width of all landscape islands must be a minimum of 10 feet. 3. The 8" oak tree located on plans along the southeast property line must be preserved. Revised landscape plans shall note the tree as saved. 4. The London plane -tree and Norway maple listed in the Plant Schedule shall be replaced with appropriate species from the city's Approved Tree List. Water Resources: 1. Sheet C-3.1 the two swalesibasin areas shown on the southern property boundary shall be stabilized as soon as possible after going on-line but no more than 48 hours afterwards. 2. The Stormtech system shall be owned and maintained by the property owner. 3. A drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the Stormtech system and the two basins located south of the parking lot. 4. The design shall be modified to prevent the wall from experiencing inundation. In the event this is not possible, the drainage and utility easement shall clearly state that the retaining wall is the sole responsibility of the property owner. 5. The applicant shall prepare an operations and maintenance manual which shall include a schedule of inspection as well as anticipated routine maintenance to maintain performance of the storm water convenience and treatment system in perpetuity or until such a time as all parties agree it is no longer necessary. This document shall include persons responsible for inspections and maintenance and shall be recorded against the property. 6. The city or their representative shall be granted rights to come onto the property during and after construction of the site to inspect the facility. 7. Inspection reports and maintenance records regarding the storm water treatment system shall be made available to the City within 30 days of receiving a written request. 8. The applicant must evaluate the conveyance downstream to assure adequate capacity exists. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for all other agency permits such as MPCA, RPBCWD, MN DOT, MNDOT, et al. 10. The stormwater connection fees will be due at lot consolidation. The fee is $39,994.68. 6. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. CITY OF CHANHASSEN M AND: Denny Laufenburger, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager BY: Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this —day of . 2016, by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2016 by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building pennits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final 3 acceptance. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on -site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Og ancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Construction activities in conjunction with new developments and city improvement projects, including but not limited to grading, utility installation and paving, requiring the use of heavy equipment shall be pemvtted between the hours of 7:00 am. and 6:00 p.m. on any weekday and 9:00 am. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No such activity is permitted on Sundays or public holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws. Ordinances. and Regulations. In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall famish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. 0 Legal Description of Property: Parcel 1: PID: 258900020 Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following two tracts: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly comer of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14,1991, as Document No. 122284. Parcel 2: PID: 258900021 All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly comer of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 2 and there temrinating. 0 CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this_ day of , 20_ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 ,by DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 10 NOTARY PUBLIC MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE PLAN AGREEMENT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Agreement, agrees that the Site Plan Agreement shall remain in fiill force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _ day of 20_ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 20 .by DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-I100 11 NOTARY PUBLIC May 16, 2016 CITY OF CIA NSEN Mr. Jason Hill 7700 Market Boulevard Chick-fil-A Inc. PC Box 141 Chanhassen, MN 55317 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, GA 30349 Administration Phane:952.2271100 Re: Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, Planning Case #2016-08 Fax:952.227.1110 Dear Mr. Hill, Building Inspections Phone: 952,227.1180 This letter is to confirm that on May 9, 2016, the Chanhassen City Council approved Fax: 952.227.1190 the site plan for a 4,775 square foot, one-story building with a drive-thru and a Engineering variance for hard cover, plans prepared by HR Green, Inc., dated 02/23/16, subject to Phone: 952.227.1160 the following revised conditions and adopts the findings of fact: Fax: 952.227.1170 Building: Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 1. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. Fax:952.227.1110 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in Park & Recreation the State of Minnesota. Phone: 952.227.1120 3. Retaining walls over four high must be designed by a professional engineer and a Fax: 952.227.1110 permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. Sanitary and storm sewer service must comply with Minnesota State Plumbing Recreation Center Code (see Table 701.1). 2310 Coulter Boulevard 5. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete Phone: 952.227.1400 building plans are submitted. Fax: 952.227.1404 6. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as Planning & soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Natural Resources Phone:952.227.1130 Engineering: Fax:952.227.1110 1. Several proposed items are shown within the city's drainage and utility easement, including: both retaining walls, clearance bar post for the drive-thru and the Punic works Chick-fil-A monument sign. These items must be moved out of the easement or 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 the applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement with the city after, but Fax: 952.227.1310 concurrent to the site plan agreement. 2. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the two Senior Center drainage basins located south of the parking lot. Phone: 952.227.1125 3. Staff has requested further analysis to include the Market Boulevard intersection. Fax:952.227.1110 4. The applicant's engineer shall also examine ways to mitigate the queueing and Website decreased LOS. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 5. The applicant shall and re -stripe the intersection of W 79th Street & Great Plains Boulevard to provide a longer left turn queue. SCANNED Chan hass en is a Community for Life -Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 6. The applicant's engineer shall verify whether an adequate sight line is provided for vehicles exiting via the eastern site access. 7. The applicant shall follow the accessibility code for the construction as well as all applicable State and Federal laws. 8. The applicant shall coordinate with city staff prior to removal or construction of the services regarding inspection and traffic control on W 79'h Street. 9. Once construction is complete, the applicant shall retain ownership of the proposed sanitary service, water service and hydrant constructed on this property. Planning: 1. The applicant shall combine the two parcels as one lot. 2. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 3. Wall lighting and the trash enclosure lighting shall comply with city code. 4. The proposed monument sign shall be relocated on the site to comply with city code. 5. Signage shall comply with city code and requires separate sign permits for each sign. 6. The applicant shall reduce the drive-thru entry width to one lane to add a landscape peninsula in the southwest comer of the building and to expand the patio area. 7. The applicant shall investigate the shortening of the service sidewalk connecting the building to the parking lot. 8. The applicant shall provide enhanced landscaping to the north of the building. Landscaping: 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to accommodate more of the required bufferyard trees m the south and east buffer yard areas. 2. The interior width of all landscape island must a minimum of 10 feet. 3. The 8" oak tree located on plans along the southeast property line must be preserved. Revised landscape plans shall note the tree as saved. 4. The London plane tree and Norway maple listed in the Plant Schedule shall be replaced with appropriate species from the city's Approved Tree List. Water Resources: 1. The applicant shall consider modifications to site grading, catch basin placement or both to minimize to the maximum extent practicable, the amount of runoff leaving the site to the west. 2. Sheet C-3.1 the two swales/basin areas shown on the southern property boundary shall be stabilized as soon as possible after going on-line but no more than 48 hours afterwards. 3. The applicant shall do additional subsurface exploration/investigation to provide more substantial evidence that the infiltration system will work as modeled. The method of exploration/investigation shall be left to the applicant and their engineer's discretion. In the event the findings indicate that infiltration is not feasible, stormwater management plans shall be modified accordingly. 4. The Stormtech system shall be owned and maintained by the property owner. 5. A drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the Stormtech system and the two basins located south of the parking lot. 6. The design shall be modified to prevent the wall from experiencing inundation. In the event this is not possible, the D&U shall clearly state that the retaining wall is the sole responsibility of the property owner. 7. The applicant shall prepare an operations and maintenance manual which shall include a schedule of inspection as well as anticipated routine maintenance to maintain performance in perpetuity or until such a time as all parties agree it is no longer necessary. This document shall include persons responsible for inspections and maintenance and shall be recorded against the property. 8. The city or their representative shall be granted rights to come onto the property during and after construction to inspect the facility. 9. Inspection reports and maintenance records shall be made available to the City within 30 days of receiving a written request. 10. The applicant must evaluate the conveyance downstream to assure adequate capacity exists. 11. The model shall be modified to include the area that drains into ST-41 and the area that drains into ST-6 as basins. 12. Additional detail is needed for the Stormtech system to fully evaluate its efficacy. These items include elevation of chambers, interconnection between chambers for evaluation of short circuiting of the system, and elevation of the stone. 13. The applicant shall be responsible for all other agency permits such as MPCA, RPBCWD, MN DOT, MNDOT, et al. 14. It is estimated that $19,997.34 in stormwater connection fees will be due at lot consolidation. In the event that infiltration is not allowed, the Surface Water Connection Fee credit shall be modified to reflect the amount of abstraction achieved on the site. If no abstraction is achieved the credit shall be $0.00 and the fee due shall be $39,994.68. 15. The applicant shall, as part of the RAP, get guidance from the MN Pollution Control Agency on whether infiltration would be allowed in the area. 16. In the event that infiltration is not allowed, the applicant must redesign the storm sewer management system so that the following conditions are met: 17. There shall be no increase in rates leaving the site. 18. Abstraction is achieved to the maximum extent practicable. Other abstraction methods such as reuse must be evaluated. 19. Water is treated to achieve 90% removal of Total Suspended Solids and 60% removal of Total Phosphorus. I am waiting on engineering estimates for site improvements to include in a site plan agreement that must be executed by Chick-fil-A, Inc. This agreement must be recorded at Carver County within 120 days of the approval (by September 6, 2016) and prior to the issuance of a building permit. The required security will be specified in the site plan agreement and shallbe submitted in conjunction with the site plan agreement. A separate building permit application and review is required. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or by email at benerous(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist Stephanie Smith, Project Engineer Jay Scott, Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. Joe Vavrina, FIR Green /(o -Ob Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much Mr. Oehme. Paul Oehme: Thank you. 445 WEST 79TH STREET — CHICK FIL-A: SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT A 4,775 SOUARE FOOT RESTAURANT ON 132 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS SERVICES DISTRICT (BH) AND LOCATED AT 445 WEST 79TH STREET. APPLICANT: CHICK-FIL-A INC. OWNER: CHANHASSEN SHOPPES, LLC. Mayor Laufenburger: Do we have a staff report? Ms. Aanenson, nice to see you this evening. Kate Aanenson: Thank you Mayor, members of the City Council. This item is a request at 445 West 79' Street for a site plan review with a variance for a Chick-fil-A drive thru restaurant. This item did appear before the Planning Commission on their April 19a' meeting. A couple issues that came up. Most notably the question of whether or not there was a cross access between the two properties there. The hotel and the existing Highway 5 center. I'll go through that in a little bit more detail but there is a cross access agreement which kind of comes into play in the discussion for the variance so they did vote 5-0 to approve the site plan. So this is the subject site. The Highway 5 center. Again this property, the current Highway 5 center was built most recently. Before that it was the Prairie House so the Prairie House restaurant was built in conjunction, you can't see the entire building here. There we go. The Prairie restaurant here so this is the common driveway here between the two that there was a question on whether there was cross access so the, we have no record of when the permit was for the Prairie House but again those two were built I believe in the 70's, early 80's and then in 1996 the Highway center so there's been restaurants in there. Sporting good stores so now that's kind of gone it's life cycle and as you are aware the City also, this property right here is owned by the City and to make this project go forward the City entered into a purchase agreement which you had approved and so when we go to approve the site plan agreement the closing will take place on that at the same they execute the site plan agreement. So this is the existing subject property. So the applicant is requesting approval for the site plan which is a requirement of our city code to go through site plan approval. It does have a drive thru which is permitted in this zoning district but there is a variance for the hard cover and the staff s position on this, when the Prairie House was built with the hotel it was pretty much all hard cover so when the Highway 5 center came in we reduced that but now this application is reducing even further to, the requirement is 65 but they're going to 77 percent so they're reducing the amount that's out there. So the intent of the business highway is to provide for highway oriented commercial development and low building profile which this building is. It's capturing on a location that has a lot of trips along the highway and then also lower profile. So the joint access to the property to the west reduces the green space because of the shared cross access. They can't put landscaping in that so that prohibits them to meeting some of those standards. So the applicant is trying to redevelop a site that currently exceeds by 17 percent. As I stated right now it's at 81 and bringing it down to 77 16 `^^�1O e� ... _ �� _ ��_ �� Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 so they're moving in the right direction so staff felt that we would support the request for the hard cover. Again the findings and that are in your staff report. So this is how the site lays out right now. So the building is approximately a little over 4,000 square feet and the, some of the issues that we had on this is trying to make, reduce the double driveway which is what they wanted so we reduced it down to 1 here. We also wanted to increase the patio space and this island will be landscaped a little bit differently. Again trying to allow for the 2 driveway. This is their prototypical. It is parked a little bit more than a standard. We went through a lot of discussion on that. They showed us what their typical is that they have in the metro area which is a little bit more stacking for their use itself so some of the issues that we had is making sure that they had enough stacking as they drove down to the building and getting around and then reducing some of the hard cover by such things as we're changing the sidewalk to shorten up the length of that trip. Again you'll be able to walk up to, there's a sidewalk on West 790' so it is walkable. So there are some changes to the site. You can see here on the landscaping we've shown the green area here so making this area a little bit bigger. Pinching that driveway and creating a bigger patio on the site and the additional landscaping. It does meet the city code. They are making some modifications again before we execute the site plan agreement. All those conditions for modifications are shown in the conditions of approval. This Chick-fil-A when it came in was a little bit more their prototypical Chick-fil-A so we worked really hard to ask them to do a little bit different. I would say this probably mimics a little bit more the Noodles on the target site. The materials and use of materials. If I can show those really quickly. So those would be the materials that are on the building. Again it's pretty articulated with the awnings that are the metal so we think it's an attractive building. So the top elevation that you're looking at is actually facing Highway 5 so that's what you'll see from Highway 5. They'll have signs on that frontage. And then the one just below that will be facing the hotel correct, yep. Mayor Laufenburger: So it looks like. Kate Aanenson: That's kind of the main entrance. Mayor Laufenburger: We're looking at this, the entrance is those double doors on the right, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct Mayor. That's the main entrance then. And then on the north side that would be facing West 79"' Street. Again the fenestration meets all the requirements. You can see there's use of the spanrow so we have not just a big block wall facing West 79". And then the east elevation which will be facing then the city property and the Holiday gas station would be the most southerly one. Mayor Laufenburger: So it looks like the food pick-up on that upper elevation, the food pick-up is around the redder brick, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: Yes. As you come around the window. 17 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah there it is. That's the window there. Okay. Kate Aanenson: Yes. So again the restaurant does have quite a bit of seating. While it does have the drive thru they also have the indoor seating. So we're looking at the seating and again the drive thru window is looking at the parking that's required. They have over parked it. That was one of the issues that we asked them to maybe drop one more. They like to have 70 to make sure that they can get as many trees on the site and especially when we were looking at some of those areas where you're in the outdoor dining, kind of creating a separation between the drive thru and the outdoor dining itself. So the traffic was one of the issues that we spent a lot of time on. As you know with the existing, or the newly opened Smashburger, Potbelly, that center at Great Plains. There's a lot of traffic coming up on Great Plains and the congestion there at the intersection and turning movement so the engineering staff asked to do a little bit more detailed study on the traffic itself. Someone from Chick-fil-A was supposed to be here to talk about traffic and he's here so we let them at the Planning Commission give a little bit more detail. Before he comes up I might just jump ahead if that's okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Sure. Kate Aanenson: So what's changed from the site itself, I'll let go through the details on this. You can kind of see now here, so the hotel. The shared parking. How this all circulates coming down. Coming around. One of the issues that we brought up at the Planning Commission was that the stormwater hadn't yet been resolved. There was some issues that still needed to be addressed and so we've modified the conditions and I put those in front of you. Those are dated May 9' so those would be the correct conditions but I'll just summarize some of that and maybe the city engineer would want to comment on that too but basically the things that were kind of main concern from the soil studies that the soils should be treated as hazardous. These are based on the studies that they did because they have to do underground storage to reduce their capacity. And then 2 permanent ground monitoring wells should be installed and then that the Minnesota Pollution Control needs to be notified of some of the metals and gases that were detected on the site so again we don't think these are big issues but these are things that need to be accomplished. Because of that we've added and the engineering department added additional conditions. Those are found on the last page of the conditions of approval under water resources and those are 14 through 19 so. Mayor Laufenburger: You're referring to the document that was left at our? Kate Aanenson: Correct so those are modified conditions. So the project can go through but they need to meet to the staffs satisfaction those conditions have been met. We have been notified that even on our property there's just minor soil issues there. There's no building structure there but they still have to be addressed. A report has to be given to the City and through the building department that they be part of the record of documents but because you're doing some storm water underneath the building there's a little bit more detail that needs to go LE Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 into that. So with that I'll let, see if the city engineer wants to answer or go into more detail on that and then I'll let the applicant speak to some of those issues too if that's okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Mr. Oehme is there something you'd like to speak to regarding this? Paul Oehme: Sure. So Kate outlined what our concerns are so we're going to be working with the developer and PCA in making sure that the contaminated soils that have to be removed will be removed. As Kate had indicated the concern is, Chick-fil-A has their design currently requires or calls for infiltration of all the storm water. Most of the 1.1 inch of storm water on site so there's, we don't want to infiltrate surface water into areas that have significant contamination of soils so there's still a lot of work to do with the storm sewer design but I think we'd like to have these conditions included in the approval. It's just to have staff give some flexibility and some working room to get the design done correctly and to meet the agency's standards. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Oehme will the action that the City is asking relative to this, will this action in any way provide a timing impediment for the developer do you know? Paul Oehme: It could. I mean so there's still a lot of soils work that I think has to get done. There still has to be some communication with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to verify what could stay and what soils potentially have to be taken out. You know I think with the level of contamination that has been found, I don't know how extensive you know we can be with infiltration so the developer is going to potentially find another storm water management practice on site to not just treat the water but to slow the rate down to pre -development conditions as well so. Mayor Laufenburger: And are we as a city and city staff are we prepared to cooperate any way we can with the developer in order to achieve a solution? Paul Oehme: Absolutely. We'll work with him hand in hand and try to get some resolution. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: If I may Mayor I'll just give you 2 recent examples. Mayor Laufenburger: Please. Kate Aanenson: So if you look at the Sinclair gas station which we redeveloped, that had more significant and we actually applied for assistance for that to help the developer on that one. So that one needed remediation. The other one, the BP site which is just across the street on Great Plains that also had some soil correction issues. Nothing significant but again it's just a monitoring, reporting and making sure they're correctly handling it. Disposing of it so that's a lot of what it is but this is a little more complicated when they were planning on putting storm Wt Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 water under there and how you separate those two so you're not increasing or spreading contaminated soils. Mayor Laufenburger: And just to correct or to make sure we understand Mr. Oehme. We are property owners are required, you mentioned 1.1. Isn't it the first 1.1 inches of rain needs to be dealt with on site as opposed to shipping it down to some other. Paul Oehme: Water body. Mayor Laufenburger: Water body like a storm pond or something like that. Paul Oehme: Correct. Kate Aanenson: I'd just like to add too, you know you look at this property and the one next door, these get more challenging where you're doing infill development where there's not as much capacity left anymore and you can see the site's already over on the hard cover. Mayor Laufenburger: Sure, yep. Kate Aanenson: And yet they wanted to be able to get the drive tiro and maximize that. It's a good use on the site so it's just trying to make everything fit and you know we'll deal with that too when the project potentially redevelops just to the west. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Mr. Aanenson. Excuse me, Ms. Aanenson did you want to invite the applicant to come forward to speak to us? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I think there was some issues regarding traffic and if you would like to hear from the applicant's engineer that'd be great. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, we extend that invitation to you and just ask you to state your name and address for the record and what your role is in this development. Tim Thireen: Thank you Mayor and council. My name is Tim Thireen. I'm with the consulting firm HR Green. We're located on University Avenue in St. Paul. We represent Cluck-fil-A on these site development matters and represent them here tonight. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there, you're familiar with what Ms. Aanenson and Mr. Oehme are talking about regarding the soil remediation or potential soil remediation? Tim Thireen: I am. I will confess to not being a traffic engineer or a geologist here tonight but I know enough about the site where I'll be able to address your questions. 011 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, well I'm sure you understand that we're trying to make sure that we have a site that's ready to accept the restaurant and everything is done properly and obviously we're not going to put any impositional constraints on you that we don't think are necessary so our offer is just to say that we're going to work with you as close as we can to make sure that we get a site that's acceptable for both the citizens of Chanhassen as well as your organization. Tim Thireen: Thank you Mayor and council. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Any questions of, say your last name again? Tim Thireen: Thireen. Mayor Laufenburger: Thireen. Any questions of Mr. Thireen? Kate Aanenson: I apologize because the traffic engineer was last week. I thought the traffic engineer so I didn't recognize him when he stood up because he wasn't the same person so there just was a little complexity at the Planning Commission trying to understand the traffic movements and times of days and I think at the Planning Commission if you read the verbatim minutes there was a pretty good discussion that the other gentleman from HR Green presented and showed and you can go back to what we had on our slide looking at where that peak day is because you know if you're there at, right at noon it's a little problematic in some of those turning movements. I know the city engineer's working on as you go out onto Market, making that turn on West 79'" and Market, trying to look at those turn movements too if you're to go, take a left going south so I think looking at their proposal and what they had recommended or saw as issues felt like those could be addressed and people kind of figure out the queuing. Going at different times or heading the right direction if they're going to go right or take a left. Mayor Laufenburger: It would seem to me, I don't know what other council members have heard but there is enough of a positive interest in the presence of Chick-fil-A in this community that it would seem to me that they're prepared to adjust their traffic pattern as necessary to get the food that they want. Tim Thireen: Yeah I'd be happy to Mayor and council I'd be happy to go into what the report says in more detail. I do know details about the report and recognize that that intersection there at Great Plains and 79t° is a challenge. The location especially for that eastbound, left turn to go north. Mayor Laufenburger: Anybody yes, Councilwoman Ryan a question of Mr. Thireen? Councilwoman Ryan: It's really, I mean I read the verbatim minutes and I understand the discussion but it is, it's still a big, the traffic is a big concern of mine and I would love to hear what you have to say because it is the peak hours. I mean you have the gas station. You have retail. You have you know the restaurants that you had mentioned and it's, it's a little dangerous 21 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 pulling out onto that road if you're going to head east on Highway 5 so I would like to hear what you have to say please. Tim Thireen: Sure. One of the features that has been proposed by Chick-fil-A is to restripe that portion of 79'h to accommodate a larger queuing area for us so you get, yes correct. Yeah so the big issue that the traffic study recognized was that traffic getting onto Great Plains from the eastbound 79' to make a left turn, that's where we really see the challenges with queuing and stacking of vehicles. You throw on top of that of course and it came up at the Planning Commission meeting, the vehicles that are trying to get access to Holiday gas station. It is a challenge. When we look at the traffic studies we see that there is enough flow with that movement on the left turn lane where we think that vehicles would be accommodate still to get into the Holiday gas station. That is the toughest part of the location without a doubt. We do think that when people get more accustomed to the location they will find that Market Boulevard is an attractive alternative and for much of those vehicles that they would avoid that queue on the eastbound 79's and go towards Market. Mayor Laufenburger: Kate can you show that, with your pointer there? Kate Aanenson: Yes, so this would be the other way out. Mayor Laufenburger: So essentially what you're saying is people queuing, if they queue outside of your parking lot they would queue on a eastbound lane on 79'h right? Kate Aanenson: 79`h correct. Mayor Laufenburger: 79'" and let's bring your pointer closer to the Chick-fil-A. So right there they would queue there to make a right turn, is that correct into? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Tim Thireen: Yeah and the amount of queuing that would occur in 2030 would be at the peak hour at the most. Right now I think what we're seeing is about 4 'h cars is the typical queue at the peak period and I think this is peak hours we're talking about so this is not an ordinary. Mayor Laufenburger: 4 '/2 cars out on 79 b Street? Tim Thireen: That's current conditions so cars waiting to make a left turn onto Great Plains from 79th. In 2030 that could double. It could be as many as 9 vehicles queuing so that does stack back. If you can picture that in your mind and we don't have dimensions on there but it wouldn't necessarily stack back all the way to where we've got the marker showing there. Right now the current bay area for the left turn is what 40 feet deep. There is striping back there that does approximate a median. You know of course vehicles are turning left across that median 22 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 area to get into the gas station. You could restripe that potentially to create a longer bay area for cars to queue and stack and make that left turn lane. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Ryan did you have further comments? Councilwoman Ryan: Well here's my concern because if you have an extra long drive thru line, you have put into place and I'm supportive of Chick-fil-A. I love Chick-fil-A. I drive to Bloomington for Chick-fil-A but you know you have the extra long drive thru lane yet you're saying that there's only going to be 4 cars coming out at a time and so that, it just doesn't really add up to me. Tim Thireen: Well Mayor and council I may have misspoke. The queuing that would be occurring would be at Great Plains and 79`s. At that intersection. That's where the traffic perspective, that's really the pinch point. Vehicles coming out of the development and trying to make a left turn onto Great Plains. Mayor Laufenburger: So out of, they've exited Chick-fil-A. They have their food. They made a right turn on 79'" and now they're going to, they plan to make a left turn onto Great Plains going towards downtown Chanhassen. Tim Thireen: Correct. Kate Aanenson: So you've got a very narrow stacking. Probably 2 cars, 3 cars at best I believe yeah. Councilwoman Ryan: So are you going to encourage left turn only or? Kate Aanenson: Well that's what we talked about. One way to solve is just monitor and then look at potentially restriping that so that would give more people the ability to stack within that. Mayor Laufenburger: I think that left turn only makes much more sense. The left turn out of Chick-fil-A. Left turn onto 79's Street. Send them over to Market Boulevard. Tim Thireen: What we've shown in our traffic study was we expect that about 80 to 85 percent of the vehicles will come in from Great Plains and that about 65 percent, 60 to 65 would be actually going back out on Great Plains because they would recognize the value I'll say in going left towards Market. Mayor Laufenburger: I don't disagree with that but I just knowing human behavior, if you're the fourth car stacked to make a left turn on Great Plains a couple of times on your trip, you're going to find a better route the next time. Kate Aanenson: Right especially when you're going back downtown. You can take a free right. 0741 Chanhassen City Council —May 9, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah you can go left on Market. Or left on 70, head over to Market Boulevard and get downtown and we're prepared to queue up cars on Market Boulevard right? Kate Aanenson: There's a bigger stack there, yeah. Councilwoman Ryan: And when you talk about levels of service, and not just for you know the Chick-fil-A business but when you look over at you know the impact it has for Potbelly's and Smashburger and now you have Chick-fil-A trying to come out on Great Plains to go east on 5, you have a number of cars coming out from those establishments at the same time coming across that intersection which on a, you know a slow day is challenging at best. Is there then, are we considering making it a right turn only out of the Potbelly's parking lot because I just am concerned about the potential traffic accidents happening at that intersection right there on Great Plains coming from, with both popular businesses and people coming in and out. Paul Oehme: So we did work and discuss a lot of those items with Howard R. Green and we looked at you know does it make sense to actually have that right-in/right-out and not have any cross traffic on Great Plains. What we decided the best thing to do right now is to get more stacking on, for that left turn lane onto Great Plains and look at how traffic will develop in this area in the future when the Chick-fil-A is constructed so at Potbelly's you know they do have the opportunity to go right and left out of the facility. Out of the development there too so I think a lot of property, or a lot of the traffic potentially that would come out of the Potbelly's development in the future might see that there is some stacking and some traffic backing up onto Great Plains. They might just to get out of the development just make a right to at least get out of the development and turn around someplace downtown and come back onto Great Plains or Market Boulevard and if their destination is on Highway 5 so I think you know there's some opportunities for the traveling public to not just take those lefts and there will still be some movements out there where they can still get out of the developments and onto Highway 5 in the future. Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Just a second. Bethany, you had a question first. Councilwoman Tjomhom: You know I don't want to have my question until we finish this movement first. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Is your question Mr. Campion, is your question related to the traffic? Councilman Campion: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilman Campion. 24 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Councilman Campion: I was queuing my question. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah, how far back were you stacked? Councilman Campion: I was 2 back. This is for Mr. Oehme and I don't know if this is for future consideration down the line based on other developments around the Potbelly and all that but might that area be a candidate for something like a roundabout to change up the traffic flow quite a big? Paul Oehme: Yep, so that was another item that we looked at and discussed. The problem is that intersection is so close to Highway 5 that with a roundabout or a signal we're going to get queuing potentially back up onto 5 just because of the stacking that would be involved with that type of improvement at that intersection there so we looked at that. That's not probably the best fit improvement for that intersection. You know I think down the road we probably, if things do get backed up you know looking at eliminating or reducing, trying to reduce the left turn lanes out of 78's Street or out of Potbelly just so that intersection functions a little bit better. Kate Aanenson: Just to be clear, we've explored a lot of options on this so when Potbelly and Smashburger, that center came in we also looked at the potential of this tying in. There's 2 uses that have a 30 year life span on there. One of them is the car wash. The other one is the Valvoline too. Those are also potential for redevelopment so we've talked about extending that driveway and so those properties you could go north onto that street and so that would give them access out so instead of forcing this you could come up here and get out so you wouldn't have all that congestion at one intersection. So that's a potential. We've met with some of the property owners around there so when they're, they weren't ready to develop but we've kind of thought long term some other options to take the pressure off that one point. As the city engineer indicated you're so close to Highway 5. Trying to resolve that so we're trying to think long term. Again like he had stated, if you went north you'd come down behind the park and ride. You could cut through that loop and just do a loop around so there's other options. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. McDonald you had a question. Councilman McDonald: Well you kind of answered. I was going to ask about a light but yeah you've addressed that but why can't we do a right-in/right-out onto Highway 5? Paul Oehme: Onto Highway 5? Councilman McDonald: Yeah from Chick-fil-A you could do a right in and then a right out. Paul Oehme: Oh, off their parking lot? Councilman McDonald: Yeah. 25 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Paul Oehme: MnDOT wouldn't allow for that. The access spacing wouldn't meet their criteria to have a right-in/right-out right there. Mayor Laufenburger: I think that's your answer. Councilman McDonald: Well I'm down at that corner a lot and I don't see where this is going to do anything except make it worst because you haven't even mentioned the Holiday and that's always a problem because those gas bays are always full and people are coming out there so you add that to the mix so it's not just Potbelly's and Smashburger. It's also Holiday. I think those are the ones that are really big and I know I've seen a lot of close calls of that turn off of 5 coming in there and someone trying to go out where the Potbelly's is at. There's not a lot of distance there. This is a, I think this is a I think a intersection just waiting for a big problem and I mean I'm all in favor of Chick-fil-A coming to town too but this has got to be addressed and probably not just Chick-fil-A but it's all these other businesses. I mean something's got to be done there. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Tjomhom. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Yeah I think that's what I was curious. Have you heard from any of the businesses that are going to be, is it north of Chick-fil-A about any impact they're going to have on their traffic or their customers that are trying to get to their locations? Kate Aanenson: No. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. Because where is the, where is that daycare center? Is that just around on Great Plains Boulevard? Mayor Laufenburger: Goddard School. Kate Aanenson: Yeah it's further north up here. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Goddard, Goddard, yes. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, it's further north up here. Further north. Councilwoman Tjomhom: And they're not concerned that that's going to impact their. Kate Aanenson: I think their peaks are a little bit different because they're going to be morning and afternoon drop off and their peaks are going to be lunch time and you know probably 5:00- 6:00 I think is their peak times and that was in their study too. 26 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Councilwoman Tjomhom: Because I would think that it would be, in my opinion difficult to be on 79`s Street and try to go north on Great Plains Boulevard. Try to make that turn especially if the traffic is coming both ways. Trying to get to Chick-fil-A and so I didn't know if anybody had addressed that at all. Kate Aanenson: Yeah so we looked at this at the level of service you know obviously F is failing so there's some tricky certain times in there but I think there's some things that we can do to try to make it the best we can. As I stated things are changing down there and ultimately there will be other developments that will help improve... Due to technical difficulties a portion of the discussion was not taped. Mayor Laufenburger: ... no the other one. Right there. Aren't they going to come there and just continue all the way south? Kate Aanenson: Yes. And park somewhere here. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah so they will not, they will not come through that middle portion to get into the drive thru. Kate Aanenson: More than likely not because this is. Mayor Laufenburger: And you, my guess is you would probably stripe it that way and sign it that way isn't that correct? Tim Thireen: Correct. One of the features that Chick-fil-A is committed to is another part of the solution making process here for traffic is to provide some on site signing that would guide motorists through there to the appropriate locations. Kate Aanenson: And that's typical on these type of things. You have queuing for the drive thru stay on this side or, that's typical what we would see. Mayor Laufenburger: Well you've got queuing for, you've got 22 cars shown in your loop. I can't imagine there would ever be 22 cars waiting to exit Chick-fil-A. Kate Aanenson: The first month it's open yeah it will be. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh really? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, they'll be out onto West 70, yeah. Todd Gerhardt: You still have queuing that can go back through the entrance. 27 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Kate Aanenson: Right. Todd Gerhardt: You know as you go along the west parking. Kate Aanenson: If you came in this way you could stack up here too, yeah. Todd Gerhardt: No the other side Kate. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah there. Kate Aanenson: Yeah they could come in through here. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah that way if you keep all the incoming traffic over there then the exiting traffic makes that right turn and then they have 2 choices. They can either go, if they want to go eastbound on 79a' they can go to the exit on the northeast part of the property. If they want westbound on 79' they can go to the northwest part. Well I think the questions that are raised regarding the traffic, they're real and we need to be prepared with whatever plan is necessary in order to accommodate that recognizing that human behavior, they will learn what is the best alternative for them but there will always be some of those people that are impatient and those are the ones that we have to be ready to deal with Mr. Thireen, correct? Tim Thireen: Yeah tough to control for them but you're correct yes. One other features that I'd just like to remark is that on Sundays there is, of course Chick-fil-A is not open so that is often very compatible with the surrounding commercial properties and a nice fit with the traffic needs. Mayor Laufenburger: Any further questions of Mr. Thireen? Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Not a question but a comment and again this comes back to the traffic and my concern especially coming out on 78' and then Great Plains is, if you look at or you visit the Chick-fil-A in Bloomington you know at the lunch hour and the back up that comes along by that Target coming out and you have the Target parking lot and you have Best Buy and you have a lot of retail coming, folks coming out and the back up you know, the back up queue and I know that there's a light there but people know their patterns and stick with them and again I'm very concerned about trying to get people to go to Market and exiting or entering Market to access 5 is not an easy traffic turn either coming from downtown Chanhassen so I just, I'd like to see some changes on those roads before going forward. Mayor Laufenburger: Where would you place the priority Councilwoman Ryan? Councilwoman Ryan: On Great Plains Boulevard because people coming off of 5 wanting to get their chicken sandwich, coming in and cutting across the lane of traffic and people turning left, I 28 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 mean that intersection right there with, as Councilman McDonald mentioned it's not just the restaurants but it's also the Holiday so it's everything happening during those same lunch and dinner hours. Mayor Laufenburger: Well the good news here is that obviously Chick-fil-A has chosen a site that is prominently positioned on Highway 5 so there's no question that people will know that it's there. You know traveling in both directions. That's a good thing which means that that will be a big attraction but that will also bring in a level of traffic that you know likely isn't there without it. I'm not saying that there's nothing wrong with the retailers that have been on there but this is a trending and an up and coming restaurant and I'm sure every council member has heard from somebody in the community saying you know I want my CFA. I want my CFA. Mr. Oehme what do you, do you have a contingency that we can talk about that would come in place so you'd be prepared by implement? You mentioned striping. Is there anything else? Paul Oehme: Right so we talked about striping already. We talked about just allowing for maybe a three-quarter access onto 79te Street from Great Plains so you couldn't make that left out onto 79"' Street. You can do you know just have it a right-in/right-out. Mayor Laufenburger: So you're saying sign it as right turn only? Paul Oehme: No you'd have to put a median in the intersection there. We're not proposing at this time. It's something that's kind of in the back of our minds just to monitor. I mean I think one, we want to restripe 79a' Street. Number two, if we do see a problem out here we would potentially put up a sign at these exit points that don't make a right hand turn onto 79a' Street during certain peak hours. Direct all the traffic over to Market Boulevard. I think the traffic report says that's a much better access point than Great Plains so that's kind of our next step and the third step would be to look at potentially modifications at that intersection to reduce the amount of movements at the intersection in the future. That's kind of our last resort but those are the type of things that we've been thinking about. Mayor Laufenburger: Perhaps Ms. Aanenson, can we attach, if we were to approve the site plan, it's the site plan we're approving tonight is that correct? Kate Aanenson: (Yes). Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Can we just attach that the site plan is approved predicated on staff coming back to council with a sequence of steps to be taken in the event that traffic becomes a problem? Can we do that? Mr. Knutson, our good counsel. You've often said we can do anything we want. Roger Knutson: I agree with that. The more specific you are the better as far as imposing conditions. 04U Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: This isn't a condition necessarily on the site plan. It's a condition on action with. Roger Knutson: Well the City can do the things that. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Oehme is talking about. Roger Knutson: Without Chick-fil-A's or any individual's approval. You can sign it. You can change intersections. You can restripe it. You don't need their approval to do that. Councilman McDonald: If I could Mr. Mayor, that's not a problem of the site. That's a problem of the city and if we approve this and if it creates these traffic problems it's up to us to solve them. I don't think you can put those restrictions on the site. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilman McDonald: Okay that's not their problem. That's our problem. I'm fine with recognizing we've got a problem. I think we've already you know said that tonight. I mean I would even take issue with making people go down to Market and turn left. If you've ever tried to turn left out of there when people are coming off of 5 that's, all of this is going to take some looking at and I'm not sure what the real solution is. That's why we have an engineering department but that's something that they will need to look at and monitor the situation and I trust them. They know the problem at Potbelly and I've talked to Paul and Kate's mentioned it many times. We have some contingency plans but some things need to fall in place that are kind of beyond our control at this point so. Mayor Laufenburger: That's a good reminder Councilman McDonald that we have example after example where the City has even been proactive in taking steps to remedy traffic situations. I'm thinking of Pioneer Pass Park. 781 just north of, or excuse me. Galpin just north of 78th so there's many other examples so I guess I would, that's a good comment. Mr. Thireen I thankyou very much. Thank you for your time. Appreciate it. Ms. Aanenson is there anything else that we need to know about? Kate Aanenson: No I think we covered it. The stormwater issue would be ongoing. That would be the only thing we'd hang it up on. Just so you know when Chick-fil-A opens we anticipate that we will have a lot of traffic. I don't want anybody to think that's a long term line but we will be talking to them about, that they need to provide extra management of the traffic out there in that first month or so. Mayor Laufenburger: Sure. till Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Kate Aanenson: But we are recommending approval. Again we think a one story building on this site and a highly articulated, nice design with the modified condition which we passed out dated May 9`s and the Findings of Fact, we are recommending approval. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. At this time is there any council member that any further discussion, comment or motion? Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: I'd like to make a motion. I would recommend the City Council approves the site plan for a 4,775 square foot one story building with a drive thru and a variance for hard cover, plans prepared by HR Green Incorporated dated February 23, 2016 and adopts the Findings of Fact and the modifications dated May 9' from the planning commission. Or from planning department. Todd Gerhardt: And delete item 6 of that recommendation and replacing it with the May 9`h memo. Councilman McDonald: And delete item 6 of the February 23, 2016 findings. Kate Aanenson: I think those, yeah those are the plans and spec date. Not the minute date so. Councilman McDonald: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: No it's in the staff report. Kate Aanenson: Oh sorry. Councilman McDonald: In the staff report and replace it with item 6 in the amendment that was passed out today dated May 9'b. Mayor Laufenburger: So it's the motion to approve the site plan. Striking item 6. Replacing it with the memo dated May 0. Todd Gerhardt: From Terry Jeffery. Mayor Laufenburger: From Terry Jeffery, okay. That's a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. 31 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilwoman Tjomhom. Just to clarify Ms. Aanenson, this motion approves the site plan. It does not approve Chick-fil-A is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. They have to execute all the conditions under the site plan and then we'll sign off on that. As a part of that they also have to close on our property or this project can not go forward. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright, any further discussion? Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approve the site plan for a 4,775 square foot, one story building with a drive-thru and a variance for hard cover, plans prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated 02/23/16, subject to the following conditions and adoption of the Findings of Fact: Building: 1. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Retaining walls over four high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. Sanitary and storm sewer service must comply with Minnesota State Plumbing Code (see Table 701.1). 5. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. 6. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. En inga eering: 1. Several proposed items are shown within the city's drainage and utility easement, including: both retaining walls, clearance bar post for the drive-thru and the Chick-fil-A monument sign. These items must be moved out of the easement or the applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement with the city after, but concurrent to the site plan agreement. 2. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the two drainage basins located south of the parking lot. 3. Staff has requested further analysis to include the Market Boulevard intersection. 4. The applicant's engineer shall also examine ways to mitigate the queueing and decreased LOS. 32 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 5. The applicant shall and re -stripe the intersection of W 79`" Street & Great Plains Boulevard to provide a longer left turn queue. 6. The applicant's engineer shall verify whether an adequate sight line is provided for vehicles exiting via the eastern site access. 7. The applicant shall follow the accessibility code for the construction as well as all applicable State and Federal laws. 8. The applicant shall coordinate with city staff prior to removal or construction of the services regarding inspection and traffic control on W 79"' Street. 9. Once construction is complete, the applicant shall retain ownership of the proposed sanitary service, water service and hydrant constructed on this property. Plannine: 1. The applicant shall combine the two parcels as one lot. 2. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 3. Wall lighting and the trash enclosure lighting shall comply with city code. 4. The proposed monument sign shall be relocated on the site to comply with city code. 5. Signage shall comply with city code and requires separate sign permits for each sign. 6. The applicant shall reduce the drive-thru entry width to one lane to add a landscape peninsula in the southwest comer of the building and to expand the patio area. 7. The applicant shall investigate the shortening of the service sidewalk connecting the building to the parking lot. 8. The applicant shall provide enhanced landscaping to the north of the building. Landscanin¢: 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to accommodate more of the required bufferyard trees in the south and east buffer yard areas. 2. The interior width of all landscape island must a minimum of 10 feet. 3. The 8" oak tree located on plans along the southeast property line must be preserved. Revised landscape plans shall note the tree as saved. 4. The London plane tree and Norway maple listed in the Plant Schedule shall be replaced with appropriate species from the city's Approved Tree List. 33 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 Water Resources: 1. The applicant shall consider modifications to site grading, catch basin placement or both to minimize to the maximum extent practicable, the amount of runoff leaving the site to the west. 2. Sheet C-3.1 the two swales/basin areas shown on the southern property boundary shall be stabilized as soon as possible after going on-line but no more than 48 hours afterwards. 3. The applicant shall do additional subsurface exploration/investigation to provide more substantial evidence that the infiltration system will work as modeled. The method of exploration/investigation shall be left to the applicant and their engineer's discretion. In the event the findings indicate that infiltration is not feasible, stormwater management plans shall be modified accordingly. 4. The Stormtech system shall be owned and maintained by the property owner. 5. A drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the Stormtech system and the two basins located south of the parking lot. 6. The design shall be modified to prevent the wall from experiencing inundation. hi the event this is not possible, the D&U shall clearly state that the retaining wall is the sole responsibility of the property owner. 7. The applicant shall prepare an operations and maintenance manual which shall include a schedule of inspection as well as anticipated routine maintenance to maintain performance in perpetuity or until such a time as all parties agree it is no longer necessary. This document shall include persons responsible for inspections and maintenance and shall be recorded against the property. 8. The city or their representative shall be granted rights to come onto the property during and after construction to inspect the facility. 9. Inspection reports and maintenance records shall be made available to the City within 30 days of receiving a written request. 10. The applicant must evaluate the conveyance downstream to assure adequate capacity exists. 11. The model shall be modified to include the area that drains into ST-41 and the area that drains into ST-6 as basins. 12. Additional detail is needed for the Stormtech system to fully evaluate its efficacy. These items include elevation of chambers, interconnection between chambers for evaluation of short circuiting of the system, and elevation of the stone. 13. The applicant shall be responsible for all other agency permits such as MPCA, RPBCWD, MN DOT, MNDOT, et al. 34 Chanhassen City Council — May 9, 2016 14. It is estimated that $19,997.34 in stormwater connection fees will be due at lot consolidation. In the event that infiltration is not allowed, the Surface Water Connection Fee credit shall be modified to reflect the amount of abstraction achieved on the site. If no abstraction is achieved the credit shall be $0.00 and the fee due shall be $39,994.68. 15. The applicant shall, as part of the RAP, get guidance from the MN Pollution Control Agency on whether infiltration would be allowed in the area. 16. In the event that infiltration is not allowed, the applicant must redesign the storm sewer management system so that the following conditions are met: a. There shall be no increase in rates leaving the site. b. Abstraction is achieved to the maximum extent practicable. Other abstraction methods such as reuse must be evaluated. c. Water is treated to achieve 90% removal of Total Suspended Solids and 60% removal of Total Phosphorus. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much Mr. Thireen. We wish you the best of luck. We've got people salivating for your chicken sandwich already, okay. Let's see that concludes our new business at this time. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt do you have any administrative presentations? Todd Gerhardt: We're still monitoring the Prince Memorial parking situation and also the barricades on Highway 5 which right now restrict a left hand turn if you're heading westbound on Highway 5 onto Audubon. Staff will sit down again tomorrow and discuss how much longer the barricades will go up. We are seeing the crowds reduced a little bit but we'll monitor the situation and have them removed when we think is appropriate. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt right now that site is essentially self policing. We're not putting any public safety resources on the site, is that correct? Todd Gerhardt: That is correct. Short of when officers have time to drive through and just monitor the site visually. But nobody is on site other than private security for Paisley Park and that's all internal. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. And occasionally I see some city employees just policing the area for trash and stuff is that correct? 35 (-D- 08 CHANHASSEN PLANNING REGULAR MEETING APRIL 19, 2016 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, Nancy Madsen, and Lisa Hokkanen MEMBERS ABSENT: Steve Weick, and Maryam Yusuf STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director, Bob Generous, Senior Planner; Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer; and Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator OATHS OF OFFICE: Andrew Aller and Nancy Madsen recited the oaths of office. ADOPTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS. Commissioner Tietz moved, Commissioner Hokkanen seconded to adopt the Planning Commission Bylaws as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR Commissioner Undestad nominated Andrew Aller as Chairman of the Planning Commission. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Commissioner Undestad nominated Steve Weick as Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 445 WEST 79Tn STREET, CHICK-FIL-A: SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT A 4,775 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT ON 1.32 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS SERVICES DISTRICT (BH) AND LOCATED AT 445 WEST 79Tn STREET, CHICK-FIL-A. APPLICANT: CHICK-FIL-A INC. OWNER: CHANHASSEN SHOPPES, LLC. Generous: Thank you Chairman Aller, commissioners. As you stated before us is planning case with site plan review with a variance for the hard cover on the property. It's located at 445 West 79`h Street. Project name is Chick-fil-A. Tonight we have the Planning Commission meeting. The public hearing. On May 9`s this will go before City Council for final determination. The applicant is Chick-fil-A Inc and the owner of the property is Chanhassen Shoppes LLC. This property is located at the northwest comer of Highway 5 and Great Plains Boulevard. The existing building on site is on one lot. There's a little extension to the southeast that the City currently owns. There's a purchase agreement in place to sell that to the property owner and Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 create one bigger lot. Previously on this site there was Prairie House restaurant and then after that the current commercial center, a 10,000 square foot multi tenant building was built in 1996 and now they're proposed to remove the existing building and put in a separate structure for Click-fil-A. The property is zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH) which permits, it's really oriented to vehicular access type uses. It permits almost, the most commercial uses that we have in all our zoning districts. The property is guided for commercial uses. The zoning and land use are consistent with each other. Access to the property is via West 79' Street on the north side. There's no direct access to either Great Plains Boulevard or Highway 5. On the west side of this property there's a joint access with the Chanhassen Inn and that will remain in place throughout this development. Again the request is for a site plan review approval for the construction of a one story restaurant building with a drive thru facility. It's about 4,775 square feet. The variance is for hard cover. They're requesting an increase from 65 percent which is permitted under the zoning ordinance to 77.5. We have proposed some revisions to the plan that reduce that but not a lot. It's still over 77 percent and we'll get into that later. And we'll address the variance first. Again they're requesting 77.5 percent hard cover. This property, the BH district provides for highway commercial development type uses and so it's really designed for vehicular uses. This is the most vehicular use if you had a drive thru restaurant on a commercial property. It has great visibility to the highway. Easy access. The joint access with the property on the west is part of the problem for hard cover maintenance. Generally we see perimeter landscaping where the properties can make up for their green space. In this case they can't. I took a 10 foot strip at 280 feet on the west side and that's why I came up that they lose at least 2,800 square feet of green space or pervious surfaces. They're trying to redevelop a site that currently exceeds the hard cover. It's at 81.9 percent now so that is over, the resulting percentage hard cover will be less than currently exists but they also have a slightly bigger property so the net result is it's about a wash between the proposed hard cover and what they have now. However we believe that it is a reasonable use of the property. They are trying, they're meeting all the city code requirements for green space. For parking lot landscaping. Perimeter landscaping and they have made some modifications that will, like I said reduce the amount from 77.5 to and I believe Joe may have the final number. They're still working on that. They're making some corrections. They'll go through that. Here's the site plan. It has some of the revisions. Originally the drive thru for the, had two drive lanes coming into it and so in this case you see that we had them reduce it down to one. They were able to pick up this corner for some landscaped area. It's potentially I don't know I have to ask Alyson if they can reduce the radius on this curve and add a little more green space. They were able to expand this patio area which was at one time it was limited to straight across here so it becomes a better functioning area for people to congregate and eat their food. Drive thru continues. We're also looking at trying to shorten up this sidewalk by at least a panel, maybe two if we can shift it to the west slightly and so they pick up some more green space. This is the area that they're purchasing from the City so that was just basically for the drive thru. It does represent a significant portion of their green space. We also are working with them to make sure all their landscape islands are at least 10 feet interior diameter. Interior dimensions of pervious surface so we have areas there. I was in some preliminary talks with Terry to see if it was possible if their proposed stormwater system doesn't work if we can use some of these landscape islands to provide a rain garden type 2 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 area. That water from the parking lot that could flow directly into them and that's something we'll continue to look at. Again I just tried to highlight all the landscape areas in this. Again we are looking at expanding all the islands to meet the 10 feet interior dimension between, behind the curb. The perimeter on the east side is primary green space and then along the north property line. They're working there. As part of our review they are short a few trees and they have some trees that aren't really acclimated for this area so we recommend that they make some changes. There is an 8 inch oak that's right on this property line up here and it's just south of the Holiday and they will be preserving that in place so we will be receiving the revised landscape plans as they go forward showing that that will remain. Oh the stormwater system is underground here. We're seeing that a lot because there's not a lot of green area that they can. The concern is with the downstream system from this. That it is under sized and it won't accommodate additional stormwater runoff and so currently they have to meet the 1.1 inch of retention on site and so we're working with them to verify that their system will actually work. They need some additional information regarding the water table out there and then the calculations for the actual system. They will meet it. It's just how eventually it's done is may be modified as we go forward and get additional information. The building is, basically it's a two tone building. I sort of, we tried to design it to make it look like there's two components to it. Brick is the primary material and let's see I'll go to the overhead cam. The primary brick color is that red, the reddish brown brick on the left side. I can't even remember the name. Red velour is what they call it and then the other one is beige colored brick and that's primarily the entrance area and the eastern end of the building. They have dark bronze anodized window framing and also the coping at the top of the window and then also they have, we've had them incorporate metal canopies over the windows so all these darken areas represent canopies. These flat areas are also canopies but they're those flat projecting ones. They don't come down or up and so we see a lot of that in the new construction. These are actually functional canopies so they'll help in the summer months to reduce some of the heat into the building and that's one, it also provides additional architectural interest to those elevations. Okay each of these windows, these are actual metal canopies over the windows. The flat ones are over the entrance areas and the service doors so you'll see this is on the west end of the building. This is the west elevation. It's what you would see as you were coming down Highway 5 from the west. This is the south elevation. Here's north elevation. There's not, these are faux windows in here. This one is on the north end. It has a canopy. It's faux window also so this is a service area within the building and this is the east elevation as you're coming west on Highway 5 what you would see. Signage is composed, well it's permissible on 3 elevations. They're not using it on the north side of the building so they're using it on their main entrances which is on the west side. Right here above the main entry on the Highway 5 side. And then also on the Great Plains side of the building and that, we didn't do a review for compliance with city ordinance but that's a condition of approval that they have to meet the requirements under the BH district regulations for size. Lighting is proposed throughout the development. They have, they meet all the requirements in the parking lot. On the roof they do have one spotlight and I've been advised that that's to light the United States of America flag which is permitted under city ordinance so otherwise they have downcast lighting around the building. It's little sconces. As part of our review we want to make sure that they don't have, it's all downcast so it doesn't shine up and that again is a condition of approval. 3 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 Here's the interior layout of the building. This is the north side up here. South, west and east of course and these are more service areas along on the south. Northeast comer of the building. There is a little play area in the southeast comer of the building. The patio area would be on, along the south side here. As a part of our review we requested that the applicant perform a traffic study of the area. Specifically at West 79s' Street and Great Plains Boulevard but then we also looked at it at Market Boulevard. Their engineer will talk about this more in the future. As always left turns are where we have problems with traffic circulation and so I'll let him get into that. It's currently an F. It will remain an F and eastbound West 79a' Street and Great Plains Boulevard unless we get different traffic patterns in the community. And again I'll let their engineer discuss that fiuther. I think that's what that. Staff is recommending approval of the site plan with the variance for the hard cover subject to the conditions in the staff report and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. With that I'd be happy to answer any questions. Aller: Anyone have any questions at this point in time of staff? Tietz: Yes. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Yeah Bob. Can you help clarify, there's code requires 60 stalls and they're putting in 72 stalls. What's, help me, help clarify what's driving that? Is that their analysis of traffic and what they think the facility's going to drive? Generous: Commissioner Tietz, yes. Basically it's their operating standard. They're looking for at least 70 stalls. With the modifications we're talking about I believe they may lose a couple so they'll be below that 73. Tietz: Because if they met code they'd have no problem meeting the coverage I don't think if you eliminated 12 stalls. Aanenson: That's correct. There was a lot of discussion on that when we first met with them so we asked to see their analytics from other stores that they've built in the metro area what they used and that's what they determined. They gave us kind of their peak hours. What their biggest demand is. What they would need for that. Because it's tight parking in there right now, you have the Holiday and then ultimately we believe the other property's going to get redeveloped too. Tietz: The motel or the inn? Aanenson: Correct. Some day in the future. Tietz: Yeah. 4 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 Aanenson: It's over 30 years in it's life cycle there so we did spend a lot of time with them on that. That was a big issue for them. I guess the perspective we took right now it's solid asphalt. There's no trees or anything in there. It was built to a different standard so because we were moving towards getting compliance and doing the underground stormwater treatment which isn't there right now, that was our position but you're right. If they dropped those stalls they could meet the requirement. Tietz: With a shared road Kate for entry is there any potential in the future that as that site to the west gets redeveloped that there is potentially a shared parking? Aanenson: Yes. I think that's what we could look at if it's offset demand just like we have down at the Villages on the Pond or we have actually in the Dinner Theater district. We actually have a nice matrix there looking at what peak demands are there so because we don't know what that use is going to be. We've had some interesting thoughts there that would drive up parking so yes. We always try to look at shared and that's something we might want to put in the standards too especially they're usually not open on Sundays so that might be something too that we might make a condition. That's a good point. Tietz: Thank you. Aller: Any further discussion at this time? Any questions? Okay, we'll have the applicant step forward if he'd like to make a presentation and please state your name for the record. Joe Vavrina: Sure my name is Joe Vavrina with HR Green. Project manager for the project. Aller: Welcome. Joe Vavrina: And I'm hereto represent Chick-fil-A. Thank you for entertaining our proposal tonight. I figured I'd jump right into traffic. I know Bob had mentioned that there would be further discussion on that so I put together this quick overall exhibit to kind of highlight the area that we looked at. This area in here is the Chick-fil-A. Where the Chick-fil-A will be built and the two intersections that were looked at which was Great Plains and 79a' and then Market and 79a' which is over here on this side. See if we can get that all in the picture maybe. So working with staff there was initial concern that on the intersection of Great Plains and 79' there's some back up potentially today with the eastbound left turns on 79th going northbound to Great Plains so we went out and did a traffic study on that intersection specifically to start. Looked at the peak hours. Both the midday as well as the pm peak during the week as well as Saturday during lunch hours. We determined, we went out and did counts between 11:00 and 1:00 during the week, 4:00 and 6:00 during the evening hours, and 11:00 and 2:00 on Saturdays. We determined the peaks were between 11:15 and 12:15 during the week. The pm peak was between 5:00 and 6:00 and then on Saturday it was between 11:30 and 12:30. So looking at those specific hours we developed the level of service analysis and queue determinations for the intersections in all the legs so the first item that we wanted to look at was the northbound left on Great Plains so that Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 would be this movement as you turn onto Great Plains to make the left into 79h. We wanted to make sure that there was no back up that would occur onto Highway 5. In the analysis that we looked at there was no level of service drop. It remained at, I believe it was an A which is the best level of service you can possibly get. Again there is no stop control on Great Plains in either the north or south bound directions so it's pretty much a free flow into 70. We then looked at all the other legs and really the leg that, you know as Bob had mentioned earlier that currently fails today is the eastbound left on 79' going northbound Great Plains. As the Chick-fil-A would develop it would concurrently remain to be an F so we looked at things that we could do to help mitigate that to help and improve the situation out there. We also looked at you know how does the traffic distribute coming into the Chick-fil-A and going out of the Chick-fil-A which is really going to be two different percentages. As traffic approaches we looked at an 85/15 split where 85 percent of the traffic comes from the east. From Highway 5 up through Great Plains and into the development and the other 15 would come from Market Boulevard down 79s' and then into the development. From an existing perspective, again this is just during the peak, that percentage changes knowing that human nature is going to look at and see if there is a back up at this left turn lane at Great Plains, they're going to go to Market Boulevard because they know that hey there's alternate ways to get in and out of this area and they will take an alternate means to get out so the exiting distribution was a 65/35 where 65 would go out to Great Plains and then back to 5, or north and the other 35 would go to Market Boulevard. We looked at the level of service impacts at Market Boulevard as well and thanks to the City they provided, or staff provided us some counts they had recently done at Market Boulevard to help us understand how that intersection would operate today and in the future and really the only impact in movement was the westbound left onto Market. Currently today that operates at a level of service E and after development it would go to an F but it's marginally right at the E to F so right now it's a high E and when the Chick-fil-A goes to a very low F. It's like a 2 second difference as far as the time delay so in our opinion it's a negligible impact on Market. The improvements or recommendations that we came up with in the study to again help mitigate you know some of what's going on at the Great Plains intersection was to restripe this median here to extend it and create a longer left turn bay and storage. That would provide additional area for cars that are trying to make that left out. Room to stack so that they don't block the right, the right through combo. That is something that Chick-fil-A has committed to do if everyone deems to be acceptable. And then the other thing would be to possibly add some informational signage on site for those that aren't familiar with the area. That are visiting the site. Just passing through that if this access point appears to be congested that they could use the Market Boulevard access point as an alternate means to either go north or to get back to Highway 5. It's a challenging intersection being at Great Plains and 70. It's you know within 250 foot of Highway 5. You know a lot of the things that us as engineers use to help solve some of the traffic issues such as stop control, signals wouldn't work in this situation because it would create more of an issue to Highway 5 and back traffic up into Highway 5 so unfortunately we can't go with any of those solutions that we typically would look at and really are limited to the things that we can do out there. The restripe for the left turn lane makes sense. Provides additional storage. I think in the, with the proposed development we would fit all the vehicles in that peak hour which was 95 percentile that we looked at which was worst case scenario which doesn't happen every day. I Z Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 was just out there tonight and there was nobody making a left turn out of there at 5:30 so I mean again it's the worst case scenario but in that event if we were to restripe this we could fit all those left turn movements in that and keep that right through open so that we don't back any traffic up into there to make it a little bit more safer so I guess with that I'll open up the questions on the traffic study itself. I know that's a big component of this proposal. Be happy to answer any other questions as it relates to the Chick-fil-A building. The site. Real quick I will add to the question on the number of parks. The 70 stalls that we have is, actually I think as Bob had mentioned we are, we have reduced it down and this plan here incorporates some of the changes that Bob was alluding to earlier with widening out the landscape islands to get that 10 foot back to back for here, here, here and actually that one's a little bit wider than 10 so we lost 2 spaces in the mix so right now we're at 71 stalls from where we originally proposed. Typically in this market you know we look to get at least a minimum of 70. That's what we've seen in this market that we need to operate. Anything less than that we start to bust at the seams if you will and we don't want to get in situations where people are parking in other areas that we don't have the ability to park in so that's the reasoning behind the increase of stalls that we are proposing. And then I guess a real quick blip on the building. This building here that we're proposing is a custom building so it, you will not find another one in Minnesota or in the Midwest quite honestly. The closest one that we've done this in is Omaha, Nebraska and it fits this site very well because it's a very odd shaped site and it's not very rectangular to fit some of our other prototypes so this will definitely be a very particular building for this site. Aanenson: Planning Commission just wanted you to know that the original application design we asked for changes so. And they complied with that so very appreciative of that. Aller: Great. Any questions at this point? I'm going to ask, the 70 is that in the game plan for you as a typical business plan model to also include your employees or expected employees? Joe Vavrina: That's correct. Aller: So we don't have to worry about employee parking. Joe Vavrina: Correct, that includes them. Aller: And did you take a look at the potential impact on the Holiday if the restriping is done for purposes of ingress and egress on their 2 driveways? Joe Vavrina: As far as access to them? Aller: Right. Joe Vavrina: Absolutely. Let me go back to that exhibit. Aller: What that potential impact might be. 7 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 Joe Vavrina: So as it's currently striped today with the outer stripe and the inner stripe and then the diagonal stripes inbetween, technically that's supposed to be, you're not supposed to cross that. Aller: Right. Joe Vavrina: It's a right-in/right-out. That's the way it's striped. Legally it's you know these entrances are technically right-in/right-out. Obviously everybody uses that. They enter that. It's not enforced. If we were to extend the left turn storage bay my thought would be if no one's in the storage bay people are still going to continue to make that movement. It and if you get into a situation where this is full and somebody needed to get into here you know they could always go past and make a U turn and come in which again and this is not a preferred option but they could do that. That pavement out there is wide enough to make that. It's almost 36 feet wide so they could make a U turn to get back to the gas station if they had to and again we're talking worst case scenario. Peak hour which is for a small period of time. Aller: And then water disposal, what's the potential if you know at this point for that to not only meet but to be able to avoid having downstream impact based on the stormwater drainage? Joe Vavrina: Sure. So right now what we're looking at is the underground system as Bob had mentioned and really you know the thing that we need to clarify and get some more information from our geotechnical engineer is you know where the ceiling high ground water actually ends up and is that, the area that we're going to put the cell is that inundated with ground water. If it is then our solution that we currently have is going to be challenged because it's kind of hard to store the water if there's already water in there from ground water so we may have to look at alternate solutions but if we can show that the ground water is lower than that you know the solution would be is that we're going to store the 1.1 inches. Infiltrate that into the ground and then everything else will flow beyond. You know the intent is that our discharge that we, that leaves the site will be at or less than what it is today so we will improve the situation. We're definitely not going to make it worst. We will do some additional modeling to verify some of the additional work that we're doing out here in the right-of-way. Some of the drainage swales that we're putting in that you know there's not a negative impact on that storm sewer that goes under Highway 5. Aller: Great. And then trash bins or trash, refuse what are we using? Joe Vavrina: Excuse me. Aller: Where's the trash bins? Joe Vavrina: Right here at the top of the site. Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 Aller: So easy access in and out? Joe Vavrina: Yes, for the garbage truck. Aller: And it's got good coverage so it's protected. Joe Vavrina: Yes. Aanenson: It will be similar to what like Taco Bell has. Their's are up against West 78t° Street. Aller: Any additional questions? Thank you sir. Joe Vavrina: Thank you. Aller: Okay. I haven't led off with my usual spiel so I'll kind of go through that real quick. We are a representative body recommending to the City Council for approval on these items and this item if approved would go to the City Council for final action and after we have the presentations as we just have had from staff and the applicant we open up the matter for public input so I will do that at this time. If anyone wishing to speak for or against the item before us tonight wishes to come forward they can do so. Please come forward. State your name and address for the record. Seeing no one come forward I will close the public hearing and open it up for commissioner comment. Comment? Thanks to staff for putting together such a great package. It's very complete. For those of you at home that don't have it in front of you, you can have access to all our Minutes and the packages that come before us on our city website so feel free to take a look at the packages as they progress through planning and City Council. I don't have any additional questions or comments. I think it looks like they've done a good job in working with planning and coming up with something that appears to work for the site very well. I look forward to seeing a building that Chanhassen that no one else in Minnesota or the country might have so with that. Tietz: The new prototype. Good package. Aller: Any additional? Tietz: Well done. Aller: I'll entertain a motion. Hokkanen: I'll make a motion the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the site plan with variance for hard surface coverage subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? N Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 Madsen: Second. Aller: Having a motion from Commissioner Hokkanen and a second from Commissioner Madsen, any further discussion? Hokkanen moved, Madsen seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the site plan for a 4,775 square foot, one story building with a drive-thru and a variance for hard surface coverage, plans prepared by HR Green, Inc., dated 02/23/16 and subject to the following conditions and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Building: 1. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Retaining walls over four high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. Sanitary and storm sewer service must comply with Minnesota State Plumbing Code (see Table 701.1). 5. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. 6. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Engineering: 1. Several proposed items are shown within the city's drainage and utility easement, including: both retaining walls, clearance bar post for the drive-thru and the Chick-fil-A monument sign. These items must be moved out of the easement or the applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement with the city after, but concurrent to the site plan agreement. 2. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the two drainage basins located south of the parking lot. 3. Staff has requested further analysis to include the Market Boulevard intersection. 4. The applicant's engineer shall also examine ways to mitigate the queueing and decreased LOS. 5. The applicant shall and re -stripe the intersection of W 79 s Street & Great Plains Boulevard to provide a longer left turn queue. 6. The applicant's engineer shall verify whether an adequate sight line is provided for vehicles exiting via the eastern site access. 7. The applicant shall follow the accessibility code for the construction as well as all applicable State and Federal laws. 8. The applicant shall coordinate with city staff prior to removal or construction of the services regarding inspection and traffic control on W 79's Street. 10 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 9. Once construction is complete, the applicant shall retain ownership of the proposed sanitary service, water service and hydrant constructed on this property. Planning 1. The applicant shall combine the two parcels as one lot. 2. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 3. Wall lighting and the trash enclosure lighting shall comply with city code. 4. The proposed monument sign shall be relocated on the site to comply with city code. 5. Signage shall comply with city code and requires separate sign permits for each sign. 6. The applicant shall reduce the drive-thru entry width to one lane to add a landscape peninsula in the southwest comer of the building and to expand the patio area. 7. The applicant shall investigate the shortening of the service sidewalk connecting the building to the parking lot. 8. The applicant shall provide enhanced landscaping to the north of the building. Landscaping: 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to accommodate more of the required bufferyard trees in the south and east buffer yard areas. 2. The interior width of all landscape island must a minimum of 10 feet. 3. The 8" oak tree located on plans along the southeast property he must be preserved. Revised landscape plans shall note the tree as saved. 4. The London plane tree and Norway maple listed in the Plant Schedule shall be replaced with appropriate species from the city's Approved Tree List. Water Resources: 1. The applicant shall consider modifications to site grading, catch basin placement or both to minimize to the maximum extent practicable, the amount of runoff leaving the site to the west. 2. Sheet C-3.1 the two swales/basin areas shown on the southern property boundary shall be stabilized as soon as possible after going on-line but no more than 48 hours afterwards. 3. The applicant shall do additional subsurface exploration/investigation to provide more substantial evidence that the infiltration system will work as modeled. The method of exploration/investigation shall be left to the applicant and their engineer's discretion. In the event the findings indicate that infiltration is not feasible, stormwater management plans shall be modified accordingly. 4. The Stormtech system shall be owned and maintained by the property owner. 5. A drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the Stormtech system and the two basins located south of the parking lot. Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 19, 2016 6. The design shall be modified to prevent the wall from experiencing inundation. In the event this is not possible, the D&U shall clearly state that the retaining wall is the sole responsibility of the property owner. 7. The applicant shall prepare an operations and maintenance manual which shall include a schedule of inspection as well as anticipated routine maintenance to maintain performance in perpetuity or until such a time as all parties agree it is no longer necessary. This document shall include persons responsible for inspections and maintenance and shall be recorded against the property. 8. The city or their representative shall be granted rights to come onto the property during and after construction to inspect the facility. 9. Inspection reports and maintenance records shall be made available to the City within 30 days of receiving a written request. 10. The applicant must evaluate the conveyance downstream to assure adequate capacity exists. 11. The model shall be modified to include the area that drains into ST41 and the area that drains into ST-6 as basins. 12. Additional detail is needed for the Stormtech system to fully evaluate its efficacy. These items include elevation of chambers, interconnection between chambers for evaluation of short circuiting of the system, and elevation of the stone. 13. The applicant shall be responsible for all other agency permits such as MPCA, RPBCWD, MN DOT, MNDOT, et al. 14. It is estimated that $19,997.34 in stormwater connection fees will be due at lot consolidation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Aanenson: I know you stated that but just a reminder then this goes to the council on May 91h Aller: Great, that's what I was looking for. Aanenson: Yeah, if anybody. Aller: Yes so this will go to the City Council Monday, May 9, 2016 for final action. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Madsen noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission dated March 15, 2016 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. Aller: Any announcements by the commissioners? Aanenson: Ms. Hokkanen do you have an announcement? Hokkanen: I have to tender my resignation as of June 1 '. We will be moving out of Chanhassen. Very sad to leave after 21 years. It's a step for my family. 12 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND 14ENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Chick-fil-A Inc. and Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. for Site Plan review with a variance for hard cover. On April 19, 2016, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Chick-fil-A Inc. and Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. for Site Plan Review with a variance to exceed the hard cover to construct a 4,775 square foot, one-story restaurant buildings on the property located at 445 W. 79`' Street. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use and site plan, which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH). 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Commercial uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition 4. Site Plan. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a. The proposed development, a commercial redevelopment of the property, is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. The proposed development is consistent with the site plan review requirements and meets all the specifications of city code subject to compliance with the conditions of approval and approval of the hard cover variance; c. The proposed development will preserve portions of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed areas; d. The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; SCANNED e. The proposed development creates functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. The proposed development protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 5. Variance Findings — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The granting of a variance will generally be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. The property is zoned for commercial development, which from a planning standpoint has an anticipated hard cover of 70 percent. With the inclusion of storm water improvements that will improve the surface water discharges from the site, the variance should be consistent with the comprehensive plan goals and policies for water quality. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The practical difficulty for this development is that it is not located within the Central Business District which does not have a maximum hard cover limitation. Additionally, the inclusion of the drive-thru and the joint driveway with the Chanhassen Inn to the west does not permit the addition of perimeter landscaping, which is generally used to meet green space requirements. The joint access with the property to the west reduces green space by approximately 2,800 square feet. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The purpose of the variance is to permit an efficient operation of the site for a restaurant. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The applicant is trying to redevelop a site that currently exceeds the hard cover limitation by 17 percent (81.9 percent hard cover). Even with the addition of 0.26 acres of land, the proposed development will exceed the hard cover by 11.5 percent. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The variance approval will not alter the character of the area since it is a continuation of a commercial use of the property which exceeds the maximum hard cover permitted in the BH district. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 6. The planning report #2016-08 dated April, 19, 2016, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan with variance subject to the conditions of the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 19"' day of April, 2016. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BYr Andrew er, airman ('yt,- c4-- F,) A S P a, co.k April 25, 2016 Alyson Fauske, PE City of Chanhassen Assistant City Engineer 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Traffic Study Proposal — Great Plains Boulevard Corridor Review Dear Ms. Fauske, Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal to prepare a traffic study examining the Great Plains Boulevard Corridor. As we discussed, the primary purpose of the study will be to analyze traffic operations and determine the need for future improvements or potential conditions of redevelopment to maintain acceptable operations. Other goals of the study include: • Determine the appropriate functional classification of W 79' Street (east leg), currently classified as a local roadway. • Determine what, if any, changes are necessary for the existing gas station accesses in the southwest quadrant of the Great Plains Boulevard and W 791" Street (east leg) intersection. • Review the requirements for a Quiet Zone at the existing crossing on Great Plains Boulevard. To accomplish these goals, we will complete the following tasks: • Traffic Counts. We will collect turning movement counts at the intersections of Great Plains Boulevard with W 79" Street (west leg), W 79" Street (east leg), Market Street, and W 78" Street for a typical weekday and Saturday. The 24-hour counts will be reviewed to determine the top two peak hours to carry forward for analysis, which could be any combination of weekday AM, Noon, PM or Saturday afternoon. The full counts for each day will be provided to the City for their use as well. • Background Data Collection. Working with you, we will confirm the potential redevelopment options to examine on W 791" Street. Other data to review/obtain includes existing usage of the railroad tracks, signal timing, and a generalized background growth factor for the study. Crash data for the corridor will be obtained from the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool, maintained by MnDOT. Observations will also be taken of operations at the existing gas station accesses to W 79" Street. • Traffic Forecasting. Using the redevelopment data provided, we will forecast traffic to years 2020 and 2030. The forecasts will be completed for the two peak hours selected from the turning movement counts review. If potential mitigation suggests access restrictions or similar measures, the re-routing of vehicles will also be determined. • Operations Analyses. The study intersections will be analyzed with the existing conditions and geometries using the current volumes and forecasted 2020 and 2030 volumes. Concerns and issues will be identified from the analysis, which will then form the basis of determining potential mitigation. As discussed, all options are available. As part of this task's analyses, the functional classification of W 79" Street (west leg) and the gas station accesses will be examined. Great Plains Boulevard 2 of 2 Speck Consulting Corridor Review Traffic Study Proposal for the City of Chanhassen • Quiet Zone Analysis. We will examine the Great Plains Boulevard railroad crossing against the requirements for a quiet zone. The goal of the analysis will be to determine what changes would be required for a successful quiet zone application. These potential changes will be reviewed in the context of the corridor analyses as well. • Documentation. A draft report will be prepared documenting the process, results, and recommendations of this study. • Meeting. Following delivery of the draft report, we will have a face-to-face meeting to discuss the results and recommendations. Appropriate changes to the draft report will be made to finalize the document. The turning movement counts and operations analyses at the study intersections will include pedestrian crossings and bicycle travel. However, the focus will remain on vehicle travel and operations for this study. The lump sum fee for preparing the study is $7,780, due upon receipt of the draft report. The draft report will be email to you within six weeks of authorization to proceed. This scope includes one meeting with you, as detailed in the scope tasks. Otherwise, communication is expected via phone and email. If necessary, meetings can be added for an additional $450 per approved day meeting or $750 per approved night meeting (includes preparation, attendance, and mileage). To accept this proposal, please email me a signed, scanned copy of this agreement. Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, SPACK CONSULTING Bryant Ficek, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice -President City of Chanhassen (authorized signer) Signature Date anted Name Title P.S. Please review our unconditional client satisfaction guarantee at www.SpackConsulting.com. CITY OF CAANAA4SEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 Fax:952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952,227.1140 Fax:952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 Fax:952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax:952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen. mn. us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: May 9, 2016 OW SUBJ: Planning Case #2016-08 — Chick-fil-A Site Plan Review with a Variance PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approve the site plan with a variance for hard surface coverage subject to conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact." City Council approval requires a simple majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant, Chick-fil-A, Inc. is requesting site plan review with a variance to permit 77.5 percent hardcover on a 1.32-acre parcel for a 4,775 square, one-story restaurant building with a drive-thru. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19, 2016 to review the proposed site plan with a variance for hard cover. The Planning Commission voted five for and none against to recommend that City Council approve the development. Planning Commission discussed the shared access and potential shared parking with the property to the west. There is currently an access and parking easement in place which the property owner has sent to the city. They intend to keep the easement in place with some clarification on maintenance responsibility. The Commission also was concerned that the storm water facility was adequate for the development. They applicant's Engineer needs additional information to verify this, but intends to meet the requirements of the city and watershed district. Finally, the city had the applicant review the traffic impacts of the development. The study was expanded to include the intersection of Market Boulevard and West 79's Street. Potential improvements and mitigation measures were included in the study. Planning Commission minutes for April 19, 2016 are included in the consent agenda for the May 9, 2016, City Council packet. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed development subject to the conditions of the Planning Commission staff report and adoption of the Planning Commission findings of fact. ATTACHMENTS Planning Commission Staff Report Dated April 19, 2016. PC DATE: April 19, 2016 C _1 f.CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: CC DATE: May 9, 2016 REVIEW DEADLINE: May 17, 2016 CASE #: 2016-08 BY: RG, JM, JS, SS, ML, TJ "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the site plan with a variance for hard surface coverage subject to conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan Review with a Variance from the hard cover requirement to construct a 4,775 square -foot restaurant with a drive thru — Chick-fil-A. LOCATION: 445 West 79th Street (Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition) APPLICANT: Chick-fil-A Inc. Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. 5200 Buffington Road 9478 Riley Lake Road Atlanta, GA 30349 Eden Prairie, MN 55347 (404) 68408530 (651) 336-6060 iason.hill@cfacom.com JayScott(asolomonre.com PRESENT ZONING: Highway and Business Services District (BH) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial ACREAGE: 1.32 acres DENSITY: 0.08 F.A.R. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The city's discretion in approving or denying a Site Plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city's discretion in approving or denying a Variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant, Chick-fil-A, Inc. is requesting site plan review with a variance to permit 77.5 percent hardcover on a 1.32-acre parcel for a 4,775 square, one-story restaurant building with a drive-thru. Planning Commission 445 West 79"' Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 2 of 16 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article, `BH", Business and Highway Services District Chapter 20, Article )MII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office - Institutional Districts BACKGROUND City has a purchase agreement for the easterly portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition to Chick-fil- A to be combined with the property on January 11, 2016. City approved a 10,000 square foot, one-story, multi -tenant retail building, called the Highway 5 Centre, on July 22, 1996 on a 1.06-acre site, SPR#96-03. The site was previously occupied by the Prairie House Restaurant Building. The building was demolished between April 3-10, 1996 to prepare the site for future development. DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting site plan review approval for the construction of a one story, restaurant building with an area of 4,775 square feet and a drive-thru service facility. It is proposed to be occupied by Chick-fil-A, a fast convenience restaurant. A variance for hard cover is being requested to permit an increase from 65 percent to 77.5 percent. The site is zoned BH, Highway Business District and bordered by West 79th Street to the north, Highway 5 to the south, Holiday Service Station and Great Plains Boulevard to the east, and Chanhassen Inn to the west. Access is via West 79' Street. The existing development has a hard cover of 81.9 percent. However, with the expansion of the site through the acquisition of the easterly portion of the site, it would have a weighted hard cover of 65.8 percent. The proposed development is requesting a variance to have a hard cover of 77.5 percent. Staff is recommending several revisions to reduce the amount of hard cover (landscape islands and peninsulas with 10-foot inside dimensions, reducing service sidewalk length and reducing drive-thru entry to one lane), but we do not believe that we can reduce it sufficiently to meet the ordinance. Site Constraints The westerly access to the property is a joint driveway with the Chanhassen Inn. Normally, this area would serve as a perimeter buffer and landscape area which would help in reducing hard cover. However, since this serves as access to the property to the west, it cannot be utilized for pervious surface. Planning Commission 445 West 79m Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 3 of 16 Wetland Protection The City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory, the National Wetland Inventory, a review of historic aerial photography and a site visit did not reveal any indications that wetland is present on either site. Bluff Protection There are no bluffs or steep slopes present on the site. Shoreland Management The property does not lie within a shoreland overlay district. Floodplain Overlay This property does not lie within a floodplain. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE South and West He%ations North and East Elevation Planning Commission 445 West 79's Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 4 of 16 Size Portion Placement The main entry is located in the southwest corner of the building and is accentuated by a projecting vestibule that steps down from the parapet of the main structure and is constructed of light beige colored brick. An aluminum, flat canopy projects over the entrance doors and wraps around the south side of the building. These type of canopies are also located over service doors. Material, Color and Detail The applicant is proposing a two brick colors for the building. The east and north sides of the building will be predominately light beige (Silverstone) and the west and south elevations will be predominately reddish brown (Red Velour). The building incorporates three course soldier courses of red brick for a cornice on the south elevation and a two course soldier course cornice on the rest of the building and a two course soldier course cornice of beige brick. A band of brick ends is proposed around the building at a window sill height. The building includes projections of the building plane as it transitions from one brick color to another Height and Roof Design The building height is 21 feet to the top of the parapet, which shall be used to screen the rooftop equipment. The top of the parapet is capped with a dark bronze aluminum cap. The main entry parapet height is stepped down from the main building parapet. The applicant is providing dark bronze, aluminum canopies over all the windows within the red brick portion of the building. Flat, dark bronze, projecting canopies are proposed over the main entry, the pick-up window and the service door on the east and west ends of the building. Facade Transparency The applicant meets the 50 percent glazing (window) requirements. In the service and storage areas, such windows will be spandrel glass. The window casing shall be dark bronze aluminum. Doors shall be painted dark bronze. Loading areas, refuse area, etc. Delivery and service door is located in the northeast corner of the building and shall be accessed via the drive-thm lanes. A sidewalk system leads from this area to the parking lot for refuse movement to the trash enclosure. The applicant shall investigate the shortening of this sidewalk on its east end to reduce hard cover. The trash enclosure located on the north end of the parking lot will be constructed of concrete masonry units covered in a brick veneer to match the building. Planning Commission 445 West 79m Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 5 of 16 Lighting The applicant is proposing light -emitting diode (LED) area lighting throughout the parking lot with a height of 25 feet 6 inches and a 90-degree cut-off angle. Such lighting complies with city code. The applicant is also proposing decorative sconce lighting on the building. Such lighting must also have a 90-degree cut-off, i.e., it may not project upward. They are also proposing mini -wall packs in the trash enclosure. City code does not permit the use of metal halide so this must be replaced. There is one spotlight proposed on the east side of the building. City code only permits this type of lighting for the United States of America flag. Signage The applicant is proposing signage on the east, south and west elevations of the building. The applicant has street frontage on the east, south and north sides of the building which would permit wall signage on each of these elevations. However, they intend to forgo the wall signage on the north elevation and locate it on the west elevation instead, which is also their main entrance to the building. Signage must comply with the standards for Highway and Business Services District and will require a separate sign permit application and review for each proposed sign. Wall signs shall use individual dimension letters. The applicant shows a pylon sign on the south side of the building. This pylon may not be located within the drainage and utility easement or within 10 feet of the property line. The pylon sign shall be relocated on the site to comply with city code. The pylon sign may be 16 feet tall with 64 square feet of display area. Company logos shall not occupy more than 30 percent of the sign display area. Pylon sign shall use individual dimension letters, at least one-half inch deep. Site Furnishings The applicant is proposing a patio seating area on the south side of the building. With the redesign of the drive-thru beginning with a one lane entry, this patio area may be enlarged. A decorative fence shall separate the patio from the drive-thru. Landscaping Minimum requirements for landscaping at the proposed development include 3,436 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, landscape islands or peninsulas, 13 trees for the parking lot. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Planning Commission 445 West 796' Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 6 of 16 Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 3,020 sq. ft. 3,803 sq. ft. Trees/parkingTrees/parking lot 12 trees 12 trees Islands or peninsulas/parkingpeninsulas/parking lot 6 islands/peninsulas 6 islands/peninsulas The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot area. Bufferyard Requirements Landscaping Item Required Proposed Bufferyard 3 Overstory trees 7 Overstory trees 4 Understory trees 0 Understory trees 8 Shrubs 19 Shrubs Bufferyard 6 Overstory trees 5 Overstory trees 13 Understory trees 0 Understory trees 19 Shrubs 68 Shrubs Bufferyard 3 Overstory trees 3 Overstory trees 6 Understory trees 3 Understory trees 125 9 Shrubs Shrubs The applicant does not meet bufferyard requirements along the south and east property lines. While the site provides the minimum required area of landscaping, the space needed to install all required bufferyard plantings is hindered by utilities and drainage needs. However, additional required trees could be added. Staff recommends that the south and east buffer yards show additional trees. The applicant is proposing to remove an 8" oak tree that appears to be on the shared property line, or possibly off the property. The tree is located very near a gas line and at the very edge of the grading limits along the northeast property. Staff recommends that the applicant shall preserve the tree. The applicant is proposing 2 tree species that should be amended. The first tree in question is the Norway maple which is not on Chanhassen's Approved Tree List due to significant insect and disease issues that affect the long term health of the species. The second tree in question is the London plane tree which is a zone 5 hardiness that is not sufficiently hardy here in Chanhassen. The trees are not planted in MN due to low survivability caused by our winter temperatures. Both of these trees must be replaced with appropriate species selected from the city's approved tree list. The applicant shall provide enhanced landscaping to the north of the building. Such landscaping will occur in the peninsula between the drive -dim and the parking lot as well as in the landscape islands and the north property line. Planning Commission 445 West 79's Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 7 of 16 Lot Frontage and Parking Location The lot fronts on three public streets: Highway 5, Great Plains Boulevard and West 79'" Street. Its only access is via West 791 Street. Parking is located to the north and west of the building. EASEMENTS There are several existing easements on this property as shown on the survey. An existing access control for MnDOT's Trunk Highway 5 is along the southern property line. This property is subject to a cross -easement for parking with the adjacent property to the west. A drainage & utility perimeter easement for the city was dedicated with the original ZAMOR ADDITION plat. Several proposed items are shown within the city's drainage and utility easement, including: both retaining walls, clearance bar post for the drive-thm and the Chick-fii-A monument sign. These items must be moved out of the easement or the applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement with the city after, but concurrent to the site plan agreement. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the two drainage basins located south of the parking lot. GRADING AND DRAINAGE Drainage The majority of the site drains to the south and west into the MNDOT right-of-way and eventually reaches Rice Marsh Lake. The proposed site plan generally keeps the same drainage pattern. The water will be captured and directed to an underground treatment system to meet water quality, water quantity and rate control requirements. The neighboring property to the west has indicated to staff in the past that they experience minor flooding in their parking lot during certain rain events. As designed, it appears that approximately 20 to 25 feet of the entire western parking lot south of storm manhole 25, will not be captured by the proposed system but will continue to drain onto the neighboring property. The applicant shall consider modifications to site grading, catch basin placement or both to minimize to the maximum extent practicable, the amount of runoff leaving the site in this area. In order to verify that the grading plan will not cause runoff to flow towards structures, the first floor elevations of buildings on adjacent lots and the elevation at the comers of the proposed building shall be shown on the plans. Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at each comer of the lot to verify the plan will tie- in successfully to the grading of adjacent parcels. Several flow arrows are pointing in directions contrary to the grading contours. The arrows shall be revised to show a flow pattern consistent with the contours. Planning Commission 445 West 791" Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 8 of 16 Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control When a building permit application is submitted, an erosion control plan consistent with Section 19-145 of city code is required. The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant shall prepare a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and submit to the city for approval prior to the issuance of any grading permits or the commencement of any earth disturbing activities. This SWPPP shall be consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements as listed in Parts III and IV of the permit. The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has prepared a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for city review and approval. Although staff did not observe any obvious deficiencies it is worth reminding the this SWPPP must be consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit; containing all required elements as listed in Parts III and IV of the permit. It must also be updated throughout the project. The SWPPP should note that these are the minimum anticipated best management practices and that erosion prevention and sediment control measures may need to change as site and weather conditions change. The following changes shall be included in the plan set: • Sheet C-3.1 the two swales/basin areas shown on the southern property boundary shall be stabilized as soon as possible after going on-line but no more than 48 hours afterwards. • Sheet C-5.0 the stabilized construction entrance plan shall be modified to require the "mountable berm" and shall modify note 2 to reflect MN DOT equivalents. • The silt fence detail shall be changed to indicate metal tee post must be used; wood post are not acceptable. The area east of the drive-thru shall be stabilized with erosion control blanket or sod in the time frame required by the permit. Retaining Walls The plans propose construction of two retaining walls. The wall near the southerly property line is approximately 35 feet long and 2 feet tall. The wall that curves around the sidewalk on the northeast side of the building is approximately 60 feet long and 2.7 feet tall. Both walls shall be segmental block retaining walls. Planning Commission 445 West 79a' Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 9 of 16 �1 _ 1 ►/ 7It The drive-thru aisle contains a 23-car stacking from the entrance to the service window. This is greatly in excess of the code requirement for 6 car stacking for fast food restaurants. The applicant is also proposing more parking stalls than City Ordinance requires. These excesses account for a portion of the hardcover variance request. Please see the section on stormwater management for staffs concerns about hardcover and downstream capacity. The applicant's engineer shall verify whether an adequate sight line is provided for vehicles exiting via the eastern site access. Staff is concerned that the pine trees fronting W 79' Street near the proposed trash enclosure are within the sight triangle for that access. If the trees are an obstruction, the applicant shall prune the trees to provide adequate sight lines or they may be removed subject to the approval of the City's Environmental Resource Coordinator. A pedestrian route is provided to the proposed building through the drive-thru lanes. The applicant's plan shows crosswalk striping and pedestrian crossing signage. Staff recommends use of MN MUTCD approved signage for these crossings. The applicant shall follow the accessibility code for the construction as well as all applicable State and Federal laws. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards. It states that sites must meet the National Urban Runoff Program recommendations of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System standards, whichever is more restrictive. Section 19-141 states that "these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features." The NPDES requires that 1 inch of runoff is treated for water quality and that there is a net reduction in runoff volume post -development. Minnesota has elected to meet this requirement through Minimal Impact Design Standard guidelines which requires abstraction of 1.1 inch of runoff from all impervious surface. This standard has been adopted by the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District. As well as a 90% reduction in total suspended solids (TSS) and a 601/6 reduction in total phosphorus (TP). This water quality standard is consistent with Chanhassen removal requirements. Planning Commission 445 West 79d' Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 10 of 16 The applicant is requesting a variance to exceed the allowed hardcover. There are known deficiencies in treatment and in pipe capacity downstream. Even with the assumed 1.1-inch abstraction, by allowing additional hardcover the proposed development will likely further burden the system. In particular, pond RM-P4.9 bounces significantly during most rain events and is the source of numerous concerned resident phone calls. This must be considered when determining the merits of the variance request. The applicant is proposing to meet these requirements through the use of a Stormtech SC-310 chamber system underneath the parking lot. They have calculated the required water quality volume as 4,091 cubic feet and sized the system to accommodate this volume. They have assumed an infiltration rate of 0.06 inches per hour and provided the necessary surface area to have a presumed draw down time of 48 hours as required. Figure 1. Storm conveyance from subject property to pond RM-p4.9 In reviewing the provided Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis report dated February 3, 2016 it was noted that there is significant evidence of reduced conditions in the manner of grey, gleyed soils as well as oxidation of metals. These are strong indicators that water is present in the soil for extended periods of time. The report indicates a similar observation in section 7.0. Given the potential for periodic soil saturation infiltration may not occur at the assumed rate or may even be contraindicated. The applicant shall do additional subsurface exploration to provide more substantial evidence that the system will work as modeled. The method of exploration shall be left to their discretion. In the event the findings indicate that infiltration is not feasible, stormwater management plans shall be modified accordingly. The stormwater management report also include the winSLAMM water quality modeling results. Based upon the assumptions and model inputs the proposed stormwater management practice will should result in removal of 90% TSS and 87% TP. It should be noted that one of the primary assumptions is that near surface groundwater will not impede infiltration and that the feature will achieve an infiltration rate of 0.06 inches per hour. Should the additional subsurface exploration indicate that these rates cannot be achieved then the pollutant removal rates will be different and changes must be made to assure adequate removal of TSS and TP. This system will be private and shall be maintained by the property owner for the duration of its life. The system shall be placed in a drainage and utility easement. A drainage and utility easement shall also be recorded over the two drainage basins located south of the parking lot. The applicant shall prepare an operations and maintenance plan which shall be recorded against the property. This shall include inspection activities and schedule, anticipated maintenance and schedule and who is responsible for these activities. The city shall be granted rights to come onto the property to inspect the facilities during construction and after they have gone on-line. Inspection reports shall be made available to the City within 30 days of a written request. Planning Commission 445 West 79`s Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page I 1 of 16 If the operations and maintenance manual is made for the watershed district this shall be acceptable provided it includes the aforementioned information and the city is granted site access per above. The proposed system will discharge into a basin which will drain into the MN DOT system. During larger rain events, the pipe connecting to the MN DOT system will be full and water will bounce to the west where it will be picked up by an existing flared end section (FES). This FES discharges into the same MN DOT structure as the aforementioned pipe. The applicant must evaluate the downstream conveyance to assure adequate capacity exists. The model shall also be modified to include the area that drains into ST-41 and the area that drains into ST-6 as basins. There is a short wall on the north side of the basin that drains into ST-6. The design should be altered to prevent inundation of base of the wall. The wall should not be within the D&U. If this cannot be done, it must be clearly stated that the wall is the responsibility of the property owner. Storm Water Utility Connection Charges Section 4-30 of code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A stormwater utility connection charge shall be due at the time of final plat. These fees are based on land use type and are intended to reflect the fact that more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. This fee will be applied to the new lot of record being created. It is calculate as shown in the table below. In the event that abstraction rates change, the credit will be modified accordingly. Per acre rate Size of new lot in acres Totals Stormwater Development Fee $30,299.00 1.32 $39,994.68 Abstraction Credit 100% of 1.1 inch = 50% reduction $19,997.34 Total due at final plat $19,997.34 PERMITS Agency A Minnesota Department of Transportation permit will be required for a drainage permit and work within the right-of-way. STREETS, ACCESS AND INTERNAL SITE CIRCULATION Traffic Analysis Staff is working with the applicant's engineer on a traffic analysis for how this proposal will affect Level of Service (LOS) for the intersections at W 79t° Street & Great Plains Boulevard. Planning Commission 445 West 791' Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 12 of 16 From the initial analysis, it is expected that substantial queue lengths for the eastbound traffic trying to enter the Great Plains Boulevard intersection with cause a significant proportion of the traffic to reroute itself to the Market Boulevard intersection. This is expected to result in better functioning of the Great Plains intersection, but it will impact the Market Boulevard intersection. Staff has requested further analysis to include the Market Blvd intersection. The applicant's engineer shall also examine ways to mitigate the queueing and decreased LOS. Examples of mitigation may include but are not limited to signage, off -duty police traffic direction during opening weeks, and restriping the intersection of W 79'h Street & Great Plains Boulevard to provide a longer left turn queue. The final traffic analysis and mitigation recommendations are not available at the time of this report. UTILITIES The plan proposes removal of the existing 2" water service and 4" sewer service due to capacity concerns for the proposed building. The applicant proposes to tap a new 6" sanitary service line into the existing city -owned 10" sanitary main that is under W 70 Street. The applicant proposes to tap a new 8" Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) waterline into the existing city -owned 10" water main that is under W 79th Street to service the proposed hydrant and building. Staff recommends using C900 pipe material rather than DIP, due to soil conditions prevalent in the City of Chanhassen. The applicant shall coordinate with city staff prior to removal or construction of the services regarding inspection and traffic control on W 79'h Street. The applicant shall retain ownership of the proposed sanitary service, water service and hydrant constructed on this property. PARKS & RECREATION The applicant is proposing a sidewalk connection to the trial within the Highway 5 corridor. No Park and Trail frees are being collected because there is no subdivision. Planning Commission 445 West 79's Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 13 of 16 MISCELLANEOUS The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Retaining walls over four high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. Sanitary and storm sewer service must comply with Minnesota State Plumbing Code (see Table 701.1). Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. COMPLIANCE TABLE Building Height Building Setback Code 2 stories NA feet N-25'E-10' W-10'S-25' Parking Stalls 60 stalls (One space per 80 square feet) Parking Setback N - 10' E - 10' W-0'S-10' Hard Surface Coverage 65% Proiect 1 story 21 feet N-180'E-27' W-99'S-38' 73 stalls N-11'E-10' W-0'S-10, 77.5% # Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft. 57,588 sq. ft. (1.32 ac.) #Applicant is requesting a variance to exceed hard cover. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the site plan for a 4,775 square foot, one-story building with a drive-thru and a variance for hard cover, plans prepared by HR Green, Inc., dated 02/23/16, subject to the following conditions: Building: 1. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Planning Commission 445 West 79" Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 14of16 3. Retaining walls over four high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. Sanitary and storm sewer service must comply with Minnesota State Plumbing Code (see Table 701.1). 5. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. 6. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Engineering: 1. Several proposed items are shown within the city's drainage and utility easement, including: both retaining walls, clearance bar post for the drive-thru and the Chick-fil-A monument sign. These items must be moved out of the easement or the applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement with the city after, but concurrent to the site plan agreement. 2. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the two drainage basins located south of the parking lot. 3. Staff has requested further analysis to include the Market Boulevard intersection. 4. The applicant's engineer shall also examine ways to mitigate the queueing and decreased LOS. 5. The applicant shall and re -stripe the intersection of W 70 Street & Great Plains Boulevard to provide a longer left turn queue. 6. The applicant's engineer shall verify whether an adequate sight line is provided for vehicles exiting via the eastern site access. 7. The applicant shall follow the accessibility code for the construction as well as all applicable State and Federal laws. 8. The applicant shall coordinate with city staff prior to removal or construction of the services regarding inspection and traffic control on W 79`h Street. 9. Once construction is complete, the applicant shall retain ownership of the proposed sanitary service, water service and hydrant constructed on this property. Planning: 1. The applicant shall combine the two parcels as one lot. 2. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 3. Wall lighting and the trash enclosure lighting shall comply with city code. 4. The proposed monument sign shall be relocated on the site to comply with city code. 5. Signage shall comply with city code and requires separate sign permits for each sign. 6. The applicant shall reduce the drive-thm entry width to one lane to add a landscape peninsula in the southwest comer of the building and to expand the patio area. 7. The applicant shall investigate the shortening of the service sidewalk connecting the building to the parking lot. 8. The applicant shall provide enhanced landscaping to the north of the building. Planning Commission 445 West 79'h Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 15 of 16 Landscaping: 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to accommodate more of the required bufferyard trees in the south and east buffer yard areas. 2. The interior width of all landscape island must a minimum of 10 feet. 3. The 8" oak tree located on plans along the southeast property line must be preserved. Revised landscape plans shall note the tree as saved. 4. The London plane tree and Norway maple listed in the Plant Schedule shall be replaced with appropriate species from the city's Approved Tree List. Water Resources: 1. The applicant shall consider modifications to site grading, catch basin placement or both to minimize to the maximum extent practicable, the amount of runoff leaving the site to the west. 2. Sheet C-3.1 the two swales/basin areas shown on the southern property boundary shall be stabilized as soon as possible after going on-line but no more than 48 hours afterwards. 3. The applicant shall do additional subsurface exploration/investigation to provide more substantial evidence that the infiltration system will work as modeled. The method of exploration/investigation shall be left to the applicant and their engineer's discretion. In the event the findings indicate that infiltration is not feasible, stormwater management plans shall be modified accordingly. 4. The Stormtech system shall be owned and maintained by the property owner. 5. A drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the Stormtech system and the two basins located south of the parking lot. 6. The design shall be modified to prevent the wall from experiencing inundation. In the event this is not possible, the D&U shall clearly state that the retaining wall is the sole responsibility of the property owner. 7. The applicant shall prepare an operations and maintenance manual which shall include a schedule of inspection as well as anticipated routine maintenance to maintain performance in perpetuity or until such a time as all parties agree it is no longer necessary. This document shall include persons responsible for inspections and maintenance and shall be recorded against the property. 8. The city or their representative shall be granted rights to come onto the property during and after construction to inspect the facility. 9. Inspection reports and maintenance records shall be made available to the City within 30 days of receiving a written request. 10. The applicant must evaluate the conveyance downstream to assure adequate capacity exists. 11. The model shall be modified to include the area that drains into ST-41 and the area that drains into ST-6 as basins. Planning Commission 445 West 79th Street — Chick-fil-A — Planning Case 2016-08 April 19, 2016 Page 16 of 16 12. Additional detail is needed for the Stormtech system to fully evaluate its efficacy. These items include elevation of chambers, interconnection between chambers for evaluation of short circuiting of the system, and elevation of the stone. 13. The applicant shall be responsible for all other agency permits such as MPCA, RPBCWD, MN DOT, MNDOT, et al. 14. It is estimated that $19,997.34 in stormwater connection fees will be due at lot consolidation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Chick-fil-A Project Narrative 4. HR Green Variance Letter Request 5. Building Elevation Southwest Perspective 6. Building Elevation Northwest Perspective 7. Building Elevation Southeast Perspective 8. Line of Site Views 9. Floor Plan 10. HR Green Plan Sets: Civil, Landscaping, Lighting and Autoturn 11. Lighting Specifications 12. Anchor Sign Package 13. Letter from Tod Sherman (MNDOT) to Robert Generous dated 4/7/16 14. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List g!Vlan\2016 planning cas 2016-08 chick-file\staff report chick fil a.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Chick-fil-A Inc. and Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. for Site Plan review with a variance for hard cover. On April 19, 2016, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Chick-fil-A Inc. and Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. for Site Plan Review with a variance to exceed the hard cover to construct a 4,775 square foot, one-story restaurant buildings on the property located at 445 W. 79's Street. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use and site plan, which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH). 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Commercial uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition 4. Site Plan. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a. The proposed development, a commercial redevelopment of the property, is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. The proposed development is consistent with the site plan review requirements and meets all the specifications of city code subject to compliance with the conditions of approval and approval of the hard cover variance; c. The proposed development will preserve portions of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed areas; d. The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. The proposed development creates functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. E The proposed development protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 5. Variance Findings — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The granting of a variance will generally be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. The property is zoned for commercial development, which from a planning standpoint has an anticipated hard cover of 70 percent. With the inclusion of storm water improvements that will improve the surface water discharges from the site, the variance should be consistent with the comprehensive plan goals and policies for water quality. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The practical difficulty for this development is that it is not located within the Central Business District which does not have a maximum hard cover limitation. Additionally, the inclusion of the drive-thru and the joint driveway with the Chanhassen Inn to the west does not permit the addition of perimeter landscaping, which is generally used to meet green space requirements. The joint access with the property to the west reduces green space by approximately 2,800 square feet. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The purpose of the variance is to permit an efficient operation of the site for a restaurant. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The applicant is trying to redevelop a site that currently exceeds the hard cover limitation by 17 percent (81.9 percent hard cover). Even with the addition of 0.26 acres of land, the proposed development will exceed the hard cover by 11.5 percent. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The variance approval will not alter the character of the area since it is a continuation of a commercial use of the property which exceeds the maximum hard cover permitted in the BH district. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 6. The planning report #2016-08 dated April, 19, 2016, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan with variance subject to the conditions of the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 19's day of April, 2016. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION RM Andrew Aller, Chairman ,.Cic,—Og BG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHANHASSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax. (952) 227-1110 11 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date. '7/ K' J' PC Date: _ �' 1 u' CC Date: I ) ' 60-Day Review Date: (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others .................................. .........$425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 Sign Plan Review.... ............................................... $150 F/1 Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative.................................................. $100 0 Commercial/Industrial Districts" .._......._....... $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area. 4( ,775 thousand square feet) 'Include number of existin employees: *Include number of new employees. 45 ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) ❑� Notification Sign (City to install and remove) .......................... ❑� Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Create 3 lots or less ..__ ........... ................. ..... .$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot (_ lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots) .... ............... ............... $300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment. ........................................ $150 ❑ Final Plat ..... ....................... ............................. $700 (Includes S450 escrow for attorney costs)' 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑✓ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence... ............................ $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ............................................... $200 ❑� Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( 21 addresses) 0 Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit v❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation Z Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 dots.) ❑ Easements( easements) TOTALFEE: $1,413.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Demolition of the existing commerical building & parking lot and construction of a 4,775 SF Chick-fil-A restaurant, parking lot, underground detention system, & associated utilities. Property Address or Location: 445 W. 79th Street 256900" Parcel #: 25990002" Legal Description 'See Attached' Total Acreage: 1.32 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No Present Zoning: Highway and Business Services District Requested Zoning: Highway and Business Services District (E Present Land Use Designation: Commercial Requested Land Use Designation: Commercial Existing Use of Property: Commercial Retail 2 Check box is separate narrative is attached. Applicantier and ling this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained i. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to ng the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by )n of full legal capacity to file the application. This application the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this r submission of material and the progress of this application. I consulting fees. feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to ie information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Contact: Jason Hill Phone: (404)684-8530 Cell: Fax Date: 3M 5116 ierty owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, ' editions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those s or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of If this application. I further understand that additional fees may an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the Rre true and correct. Contact: Jay Scott Phone. (651)336-6060 Cell: Fax: Date: :ompanied by all information and plans required by Aration, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist specific ordinance and applicable procedural e made within 15 business days of application submittal. A the applicant within 15 business days of application. Contact: Joe Vavrina Phone: (815)385-1778 Cell: Fax: ication Information 'Other Contact Information: y Name: y Address: y City/State/Zip: y Email: ry form fields, then select SAVE FOI to save a copy to your ad documents and payment. SUBMi. to send a digital II 1 PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following two tracts: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feel to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described. thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating, and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208E on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. 3/16/2016 4:40 PM L;iTr OF REC QED SEi: Chick-fil-A, Inc. MAR b W ri 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 Introduction The following narrative outlines the proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant to be constructed at 445 West 79ih Street in the City of Chanhassen, MN. Chick-fil-A and Solomon Real Estate Group, as current property owner, have executed a ground lease to redevelop the subject parcel. In addition to this narrative, HR Green has submitted a complete Application for Development Review consisting of plan documents to support a Sign Plan, Commercial Site Plan, Subdivision (Consolidate Lots), and Variance Reviews. Please refer to these plans and other documents for additional information which is outlined in this narrative. Project Description The subject lease property is currently a 1.32 acre lot of the Zamor Addition located on the north side of State Trunk Highway No. 5, just west of Great Plains Boulevard. The site is currently split up into two separate parcels which are proposed to be consolidated. The subject parcel is currently occupied by a 9,684 square foot one-story commercial retail building and associated parking lot. The property is currently zoned with a classification of BH-Highway and Business Services District. The project will consist of razing the existing building and bituminous parking lot and constructing the proposed restaurant which will contain approximately 4,775 square feet of floor area. This restaurant development will be attractively landscaped and will feature an outdoor seating area adjacent to STH No. 5. The challenges for Chick-fil-A in determining a site layout for this property were implementing a plan that would fit a building and drive-thru facility within the lease property while providing sufficient parking to meet the needs of the restaurant. Additionally, locating the building such that it could be visible from STH No. 5 was important from a brand recognition standpoint and for potential customers to easily identify where we are located. Visibility and appropriate signage will be paramount to the success of the store. Chick-fil-A feels the plan presented before you accomplishes all of the aforementioned challenges. The site has been oriented to locate the building in the southeastern corner of the subject property with the playground facing east towards the intersection of STH No. 5 and Great Plains Boulevard. It was important to orientate the site in a way to maintain the points of access to the site in order to minimize traffic backups onto West 79ih Street and into the western neighboring development's parking lot. Additionally, this layout allowed us to isolate the drive-thru traffic from the dine -in traffic which will also help to eliminate traffic backups. The drive-thru lane has been proposed to start at the southwest corner of the building and continue around to the drive-thru window located at the northwest corner of the building. The proposed drive-thru will feature two stacking lanes up to the order points that will merge into one lane leading up to the pickup window. Chick-fil-A has found that this drive-thru configuration increases efficiency and minimizes vehicle overflow into the parking lot and arterial roads. Chick- fil-A has also found that they need enough space for nine vehicles to stack between the SCANNED Chick-fil-A, Inc. 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 pickup window and order points which provides them the optimum spacing to maximize operations of the drive thru facility. The nine car stack creates a 90 second wait time from the order points to the pick up window. To minimize backups into the parking lot drive aisles, Chick-fil-A tries to maintain a minimum sixteen car stack from the order points to entry of the drive-thru lane. The proposed drive-thru configuration allows for the preferred car stack to the order boards and a reduction in this stack would most likely cause drive-thru traffic to back up into the on -site drive aisles. Chick-fil-A does not typically include a bypass lane within their drive-thru layout. They train their employees to react to stalled vehicle incidents by pushing the vehicles through the drive-thru. Maintaining constant drive-thru operations is a vital part of Chick-fil-A's business model as approximately 62 percent of their business is through the drive-thru. An AutoTURN exhibit has been provided within the civil plan set which demonstrates how the proposed drive-thru configuration can accommodate the turning movements of a typical pick-up truck. Vehicular access to the proposed restaurant will be provided via two access points along West 79th Street. These access drives will remain as existing and the western access is shared with the Chanhassen Inn development. Utilizing two access points will minimize impacts to the existing roadways as vehicular traffic will have multiple options to enter/leave the site. Looking at overall parking counts/requirements for the entire development, the Chick-fil- A will require 60 parking stalls. This requirement is based upon City Code which requires 1 stall per 80 square feet of building area. The parking lot has been designed to provide for a total of 73 stalls. Although the parking lot has more spaces than required by Code, Chick-fil-A typically likes to ensure at least 70-75 spaces are provided. From past experience, Chick-fil-A has discovered that providing this number of parking spaces maximizes overall efficiency of restaurant operations. The Chick-fil-A is proposed to have a total of 120 indoor and 8 outdoor seats, and have approximately 15 employees during the restaurant's peak shift. Chick-fil-A employees will be encouraged to park in the 7 proposed stalls located at the north of the site by the dumpster enclosure due to the low turnover rate. Pedestrian access to the site has been provided at the south side of site via a sidewalk connection to the existing bike path along STH No. 5. Utility service to the proposed restaurant will be provided via new service connections to existing infrastructure located within the West 79t" Street right-of-way. The proposed sanitary and water services are proposed to be tapped into their respective mains located north of the site. The site has been designed to capture the majority of stormwater runoff in its proposed on -site storm sewer system. This system directs runoff to an underground stormwater management system which has been designed to meet the City's and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed's requirements for stormwater quality and detention. These requirements inclide providing abstraction for 1.1 inches of runoff from on -site impervious surfaces, 90 percent reduction of total Chick-fil-A, Inc. 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 a suspended solids, and 60 percent reduction of total phosphorus. The underground system has also been designed to have a release rate at or below the existing rates to the Minnesota Department of Transportation's storm sewer system, matching existing drainage patterns. The proposed improvements will be increasing the amount of impervious area within the existing subject lease parcel by approximately 6,754 square feet. The Chick-fil-A building is proposed to be a predominately brick building with glass accents. The brick colors currently being proposed are a combination of Red Velour and Silverstone. The visual emphasis of the building is the earth tones of the materials leading towards the glass openings of the storefront and signage. The building has been designed to meet the 50 percent glazing requirement for the elevations facing the public right-of-ways. The goal of the architectural design is to promote their brand identity while offering a contemporary and non -thematic design. Mechanical units for heating/cooling will be located on the roof and will be screened via a parapet wall. Building signage is being proposed on the west, south, and east elevations. Accent light via wall sconces are proposed around the building to provide nighttime interest. A trash enclosure is proposed which will be constructed out of CMU with brick veneer to match the building. The gates for the enclosure will be constructed out of a plastic resin that CFA has found to be more durable than metal and certainly wood. A freestanding monument sign is proposed to be located on the STH No. 5 frontage. To accomplish the development as described above and as shown on the attached plans, a variation from the City code is being requested. Chick-fil-A is requesting a variance to allow the proposed development to exceed the maximum lot coverage of 65 percent. The Chick-fil-A Story It's a story that actually began 94 years ago when a man named Truett Cathy was born in 1921 in the small town of Eatonton, Georgia, about 80 miles from Atlanta, where he grew up. Truett's mom ran a boarding house, which meant she had to cook a lot of meals — but Truett helped, and he paid close attention, and picked up cooking and serving tips that would come in quite handy later. Along the way, he also learned to be quite the entrepreneur. He sold magazines door to door, delivered newspapers all over the neighborhood, and sold Coca -Colas from a stand in his front yard and all the while he was learning the importance of good customer service. After serving his country in World War II, in 1946 Truett used the business experience he gained growing up and opened his first restaurant with his brother, Ben, calling it the Dwarf Grill (later renamed the Dwarf House). Hamburgers were on the menu but, ironically, no chicken because he said it took too long to cook. Truett worked hard with that first venture, but considered Sunday to be a day of rest, for himself and his employees and as you know, that's a practice that Chick-fil-A honors to this day. Chick-fil-A, Inc. 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 The early 60s would be a pivotal time in Truett's life. That's when he first took a boneless breast of chicken and spent the next few years experimenting until he found the perfect mix of seasonings, he breaded and cooked the filet so that it stayed juicy, put it between two buttered buns and added two pickles for extra measure and in 1963 unveiled what we now know as the Chick-fil-A Chicken Sandwich. As far as the name, Truett says it just came to him. He had it registered that year in 1963 and created a logo that has been updated but is still very similar to the original designed 50 years ago. The Chick-fil-A sandwich was a huge hit, and in 1967 Truett opened his first Chick-fil-A restaurant in an enclosed shopping mall where, up to that point, food normally wasn't sold. Frankly, the developer of the Greenbriar Shopping Center in Atlanta wasn't too keen on serving food inside his mall, but as we know that turned out to be a very smart decision on his part, and especially Truett's. Today, Truett is recognized as the pioneer in quick -service mall food. It wasn't until 1986 that Chick-fil-A opened its first "freestanding" restaurant on North Druid Hills Road in Atlanta. Today there are close to 1,600 restaurants locations in 39 states and it's become so popular that people literally camp out in the parking lot the night before a grand opening of a new restaurant; they're hoping to be one of the first 100 people in line because they'll be rewarded with free Chick-fil-A for a year, which gives new meaning to the phrase "happy campers!" Chick-fil-A is now the largest quick -service chicken restaurant and one of the largest that's privately -held. Two generations of Cathy family members are involved in the business, including Truett's sons Dan (the president and CEO) and Bubba (senior VP) and also, his grandchildren. Our Food There are a lot of things people say they like about Chick-fil-A, but it all begins with the food, and especially the Original Chick-fil-A Chicken Sandwich. It was a significant product innovation, and it remains our best-selling item on the menu. Our innovations didn't stop with the chicken sandwich. In 1982, we were the first restaurant to sell chicken nuggets nationally, and three years later added our trademark Waffle Potato Fries to the menu, and we still use 100% fully refined peanut oil, which is cholesterol and trans fat free. In 2010, we introduced the Chick-fil-A Spicy Chicken Sandwich. With its special blend of peppers and other seasonings, it became such a "hot" selling item that we soon after introduced the Spicy Chicken Biscuit. More recently last year we introduced to our menu a new grilled chicken sandwich and grilled chicken nuggets. People also like the fact that we offer a variety of menu options for those wanting foods that are lower in calories, carbs or fats, such as the Chick-fil-A Chargrilled Chicken Sandwich, entree salads and fruit cups and by the way, fruit cups are an option with our kids meals these days. In fact, Men's Health magazine named us "America's Healthiest Chain Restaurant for Kids." The high quality of our food is the number one reason people keep coming back to Chick-fil-A but there are a few more reasons — and one has four legs and is a terrible speller. Chick-fll-A, Inc. 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 Telenhone 404-765-8900 Serving our Customers Whenever you ask people what they like about Chick-fil-A, one of first things they say is "the service" and it's an important part of our story, because it goes back to Truett's experience as a young businessman and to the values he instilled in Chick-fil-A. We call it Second Mile Service, and it's based on the belief that if someone asks you to carry something for them one mile, you do one better and carry it for them two. It's doing those unexpected things that make people feel special. Our drive-thru has been voted "America's #1 drive-thru" for six years in a row. We do our best to ensure a quick and pleasurable experience, and might even have a nugget for the family pet when you arrive at the window. But no matter if you're being served in our restaurants, at our drive-thrus, or with an outside delivery, you can always count on our team members responding to your words of thanks with two special words of their own — "My pleasure." Chick-fil-A Philosophy and Operator/Employment Model The Company's philosophy is that their restaurants become integral parts of the communities in which they are located. Toward that end, Chick-fil-A makes scholarships available to store employees and sponsors the Winshape Foundation which supports a family of programs designed to encourage outstanding young people nationwide. The Foundation has a college program and operates a series of camps, homes, and retreats. On the local level, individual restaurant operators typically engage in community support activities such as sponsoring youth sports teams, supporting educational activities, and leadership initiatives. Finally, and in accordance with company policy, the operators and employees in each Chick-fil-A Restaurant strive for a level of customer service unequaled in the quick -service food industry. It is quite common to go into a Chick-fil-A and have your tray carried to your table, have people clear your table, and ask if they can come and refresh your beverage. Beyond the above, Chick-fil-A's operators model is very unique in the fast food industry. In their situation, the operator is part owner with Chick-fil-A. It's similar to a franchise except they usually have one location. Sometimes they have two but for the most part they have one location and what that provides is a situation where they have very competent partners with great character in the restaurants and they are involved in the community, are part of the community, and they spend a lot of time in the community. What Chick-fil-A likes to say is that their operators are in business for themselves, but not by themselves. It is very unusual for an operator to shut down and the retention rate for operators is about 98%. A typical Chick-fil-A store will employ approximately 45 permanent jobs with approximately 120 jobs created for temporary construction employment. A typical store will operate between the hours of 6:00 am to 10:30 pm; Monday thru Saturday and are always closed on Sundays. Hepnhnai\O:\B615W13\Uesign\��\kr-Aoject NartrtM 0}3]-l6.doc HRGreen March 17, 2016 Community Development Department City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Chick-fil-A Variance Letter Request FIR Green Job No.: 86150413 Dear Distinguished Community Development Department Staff: OiT'r 01FC.-1ANHASSEt i RECEIGED MAN 1 d 2016 ^ygrw�sSEi„PU+^�NING,-,F. r On behalf of our client Chick-fil-A, we would like to formally introduce the proposed project as well as identify the lot coverage variation to the City's Code of Ordinances that is being requested along with justification for the variance request. The subject lease property is located at 445 West 79th Street which is generally located at the northwest corner of the intersection of State Trunk Highway No. 5 and Great Plains Boulevard. The property will be leased through Solomon Real Estate Group and the overall leased area is approximately 1.32 acres. The site is currently developed with a 9,684 square foot one-story commercial retail building and associated parking lot. The subject property is zoned BH-Highway and Business Services District. The project will consist of razing the existing building and parking lot within the parcel and constructing the proposed restaurant which will contain approximately 4,775 square feet of floor area, will be attractively landscaped, and will feature an outdoor seating area adjacent to the STH No. 5 frontage. A drive-thru service facility is also proposed which will feature two stacking lanes up to the order points that will merge into one lane leading up to the pickup window. Vehicular access to the proposed restaurant will be provided by two existing driveways to West 79th Street. Seventy-three off-street parking spaces will be located within the subject property which includes three handicap spaces. Although the site layout is providing more parking than the required 60 stalls, Chick-fil-A requests each location to provide for at least 70-75 parking spaces in order to promote efficient operations at each restaurant. The request for more parking limits the amount of pervious area that can be provided throughout the parking lot. One of the challenges for Chick-fil-A in determining a site layout for this property were implementing a plan that would fit a building and drive-thru facility within the lease property while providing for sufficient parking for the new restaurant. Additionally, locating the building such that it could be visible from STH No. 5 was important from a brand recognition standpoint and for potential customers to easily identify where we are located. As such, the Chick-fil-A building is proposed to be located at the southeastern corner of the lease parcel. The majority of the area that will be occupied by the building and a portion of the drive-thru lane is currently all pervious surface. This reduction of pervious surface causes the proposed Chick-fil-A development to be unable to meet the lot coverage requirements as stated in Section 20-715 of the City Code. Phone 815.385.1778 Fax 815.385.1781 Toll Free 800.728.7806 SCANNED 420 N. Front Street, Suite 100. McHenry, IL 60050 Community Development Department City of Chanhassen Chick-fil-A — Variance Letter Request HR Green Job No.: 86150413 March 17, 2016 Page 2 of 4 In order to provide for adequate parking, and sufficient drive-thru lane vehicle stacking to efficiently operate the Chick-fil-A restaurant, and locate the building to provide for visibility from adjacent roadways, we are requesting a variance to the City Ordinance: • Allow the proposed development to exceed the maximum lot coverage of 65 percent. To further support our request for the variance noted above, we will examine it as a whole as it relates to the six main variance criteria and provide information as to how we feel we satisfy these criteria. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. a. Chick-fil-A is requesting a variance to exceed the maximum lot coverage with in a commercially zoned parcel. According to the City of Chanhassen's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the subject parcel is proposed to remain commercially zoned in 2030. The properties neighboring the Chick-fil-A parcel have also been planned to retain their zoning classification. The requested variance does not alter the goal or intent of the City's comprehensive plan. 2. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. a. Chick-fil-A is requesting a variance to exceed the maximum lot coverage requirement in order to provide a site layout that provides for efficient operations for the development. Chick-fil-A typically requires 70-75 parking spaces at each store location in order to provide enough parking for their team members and customers. In addition to this, Chick-fil-A at a minimum needs a drive-thru stack of 24 vehicles (9 from the pickup window to the order points and 14 from the order points to the entry). Being able to meet these design criteria will improve traffic circulation throughout the site and to reduce any impact to adjacent arterial roadways. Adhering to the City minimum parking requirement will compromise Chick-fil-A's ability to provide ample parking for their customers and team members resulting in traffic congestion within the plot. Chick-fil-A typically also provides a dual stack drive-thru lane to minimize customer wait times and to reduce chances of creating a vehicle que within the parking lot drive aisles. Reducing the drive-thru to a single lane could potentially have adverse effects to the traffic circulation within the associated and neighboring parking lots. To maximize the efficiency of the drive-thru facility, Chick-fil-A has found that the following should be provided in each drive-thru layout: A nine vehicle stack between the pickup window and order boards and a sixteen vehicle stack between the drive-thru entrance and order board locations. Although the proposed layout exceeds the Community Development Department City of Chanhassen Chick-fil-A — Variance Letter Request HR Green Job No.: 86150413 March 17, 2016 Page 3 of 4 maximum lot coverage, Chick-fil-A would not be able to operate at an efficient level without the increased parking spaces and dual drive-thru lane. 3. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. The request to allow the development to exceed the maximum lot coverage is not based upon economic considerations. The request has been made in order to propose a site layout that provides for efficient operations for the restaurant. The increased parking stalls and dual drive-thru lanes, although increase the overall lot coverage, are important factors in creating a desirable layout for Chick-fil-A and to reduce the chance of traffic congestion throughout the site and adjacent roadways. 4. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the landowner. a. The request for the lot coverage variance can be directly related to the size and shape of the subject parcel. The 1.32 acre property does not provide the development with the opportunity to incorporate the open space required by code after the building, drive-thru, and parking lot are configured. The layout of the existing development to the west also affects the amount of open space that can be provided. It is impractical to introduce green space along the west property line since the parking lot and access drive connections must be maintained. 5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. a. The approval of allowing the Chick-fil-A development to exceed the maximum lot coverage amount will not alter the essential character of the locality. The properties adjacent to and within the vicinity of the subject parcel are all zoned commercial. The added coverage within the subject property does not affect the goal and intent of the commercial land use. 6. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. a. The Chick-fil-A variance request does not relate to earth sheltered construction, and as such, this item has been determined to not be applicable. Overall per code, this project would be allowed a total lot coverage of 65 percent. The request before you proposes a Chick-fil-A development with a lot coverage of 77 percent. We are very excited about this store as well as becoming a part of the City of Chanhassen and look forward to presenting the project in greater detail at the Plan Commission Meeting on April 1g`", 2016. Community Development Department City of Chanhassen Chick-fil-A — Variance Letter Request HR Green Job No.: 86150413 March 17, 2016 Page 4 of 4 If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC. Joseph F. Vavrina, P.E. LEED AP Project Manager JFV/ech Attachments HrWhn SQ015M131Desig,lCo tV 1416Amp MWS Corer Vararce LeverC i 03/30/16 Southwest Perspective 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM �J -,- � i�i„ r - _ i�� I�� _ ! ilk „ .: � --- �, \{ 'r i I. _ �`-- _. i 1 i t f �� I Ii�iE �'l� L� � � � n EA3T ELEVATION 260' Li ,••ma rwn o." a NORTH ELEVATION 260' Co a u " 3 E£21111 j2c SOUTH ELEVATION 2W e-ma wnLE aermro.ru� �" a're mti nmo— ar onea: d� YM, rW ELEVATION W A-1.2 rr-ma 2 n 4 i PYAW1E5 QUEUING �`TROOM DINING CEMS RR VEST W.I.C. 1171010 ■■■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■,w■on o■■■ ■■■■ ■ 111111111111111111J1111111 in wmm I II■II II■II Ilal \ 03/17/16 Floor Plan .... ...... ................ ........................................................................... 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM IQ W.I.F. OFFICE I w ,0-9A APPI it TMF[WY.TIN- PnOPER1YI mo, eaoo awr may wn ESGIBE®pz 2RCHffECTS LWOSWINg QQNSULrANT re®^L1 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 445 WEST 79TH STREET CHANHASSEN, MN. 55317 CURRENTLY ZONED BH — HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS SERVICES DISTRICT VICINITY MAP r f11F 9FNfNWVINS" rmu mviwi PO w xN R LL1 �: � rn (wncu. w ewp M' rt �� wnr n f � mm Yo ona� w ^" m,ml, ' u YV/•!T w � d CALL: 1-800-252-1166 Af. dT m I Dui v,n Q uiE`i.v.P a^ i �peo.Eumw $aq S PROJECT LOCATION tl0)E: HRGreen COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE. W., SUITE 4WN I St PAUL, MINNNESOTA 55114 Phone: 651.1WA888 1 Toll Fm: 800.728.78D5 I F c W.844.SW I HRGmen.mm SHEET INDEX vrlaxxxo� e.�p mw. 01. � nomnm�n/wn,oa M.IIONR. D]I,mPW Pxm a`Y OFC-IANHASOL FECEI4E!) MAR 18 2016 iArIH; SSEIN RANINING nrNr SCANNL, r—. n—.> W o•9 s wwm.i W Oip • �'S'Y,",gam-J.-w-7.�: �,.i:.7. �,_: �rnM,ui W V We M CM .-a oemn m.rar mnm,,. _ IYPa lvY ymwm o01� �' Dyne. rrrar._ r.. MS w.m>�_ I1 1 \ � � I C• m"a.�i. tor 2 T . 1 -r-- ,«✓M _yf✓4 ..rr x. Mry rr_ M.mwr.�° m."f. , mu a rrd M a. a.v« n+..w>✓nr.=»rM..«,®n... �_--- uarl,a,✓.w.'n _.�„ww,._r wr ..r a,. x»o- ..•.✓• aN. mme nm i w. t s�ui..�r. � �r �....A « rw.r . rwe .ro .r R'""••, .r«nra n« �AnM: «'�rv°,.`.✓•e n o '"••r e.. sw %G1°:ir � dr w rw °'"1we s �.n. .. ,...p r", a »• xm r.m.,✓.,. - / Y.•. MY t W L M IIv1Y. P..v. «v.ne a[Y» u.v.ner. esam..r .r n..ge.ru myir ar w. �� ierr.r^py.rNj.nr,n..e r.r+M.p rr+a .y.snv a.w.uvpwe ✓✓. • ry.II e� r" __ _r•_� . c® a.«..«r w r».ry «rr u. as rvx •.e rb a4 vva �. � ; eoM.mx ,eor rear.rmo »e reo �r�rwa�/�egpv n r. ^ v r mRr F-raffy D.*" I M«IuaYAaNu.MY,b(m>rn.r.rn. ,«n«e w✓,n...e cn.. vwu YMwre..nu x'Pi° rt✓�rY tiw /:wn ,r...w r✓� ,,.r.."«..w.`««`,:A�::",r.,«r«....,,....r.r:'.' a r:r..� ..e.ra +^•�• �++..�..,r.r..t..... _ u—/:tea moo.,,✓ra;: a.r. „.. ,nrr,..rr,. br.�>..:":, :s. mm �r uMr:`u.a«r °1"«;l:.r, «'..:°' .r .r.>o.,mr« [�••Y. NOOb Yr. r.Nna. nvvry u..rer «.... w.«a•a.. e...ra s..•.«w.«.^• °Ai.w,wryn«.vm...rw«,w ,•.✓..A.«.✓.. a«.. ««✓, ..Mnr MY «q s..•1a4.•w • /YV IY NJ°r uWi 1(iYAdi.mr x.°rN.1. »uu..mvPw'6,,.,.✓wemr✓er,WruR rM+ .•1 es> M9M.i�[vm.•. rv..« 7^P 00. VJaAvvwd I� 0 w ra p Ymr n m «my m «v II I�I —� r�«.r in. •ar•n� wro. wtls rm.a ^L•.n' i _ /� a�tl —u��i _ •rvw-uw nnvm.rr mrvmm xwo x°m n wkr°y..rn ° p1n 'mj'/, �' - ; ' 1' II� u;, �":..'.�:.�,r ..:ate ;:m°: �x� mwzw ;� :•-� o �� r«. ' � � � i ^ y^rr:.� ^°»r«.»...°.«ter✓,.�...✓....« _ m.«. v j » ,.,. :d...r",n ... 1.r...,,,N. 11 111.r.n r.r I � —11 w..•oa -' .rrtcryaae[ n t.v[w.nro. a. y_ w m 0. � Mi uv.,rr011 awwvx,u.v aor ro'%riat..�tNun. ewwia � •v.mr m m"�'u.�� _.•.«. a+�x.ra�;mM�a°N�a ��i..�a ✓ m a..,« w.r .,....n_r FOR REFERENCE ONLY _ m.. C-0.2 Chick-fil-A FIR Green, Inc ,eu ,veu ALTA/ACSM land Title Survey a l I 1 1 4,, / maAv XXXX _ x�'wn agmnN v _ m [Mwv A eiw.wi � m xu�w ix iM r�io¢ W .eai Maim w m�cMrr Yo a w�M. � WTwNio�owi.o ArvT[v U _ C Mtmnm u.l � 0 S ACING NOTES: �� N vn[ ue unbs v v wNl N r� y w[ pea rw.EFlc coNTROL NOTES: µx.1SSFN iw a �mnw `� an sa a w ism sw wCHXNHA EH. MN V va, M< SITE DEMOLITION na 6 C—�.0 SITE PI AN OFSION NOTES k KEY PI <N Cl ul El ®.'mrnm vwa ® m ran nlerx• Moan•. � a umal ®rl� x1 (v wr u¢c nn Nml © vrva- a Q vari¢ rvr•¢ 8 � nwu•a ® wr 0 0 rmr` Q � W aMNtl V tr—J Qi x.arw ws ./ivamP �I ® x.aMr r ./ aaa� xlval Q Isnwm aw xane ��\\ Q *•rt YWXYFMK EanP j �©aaw vmP� ®mxa� Q mmn amuvn[r ® w��ma wre Q rmrx rnerexi errnm ®i Iran wn reran vn a� ® aamner r rum�mxv [a ©.mx ® e ® neanm[ r ramm�rr mom o�/�� ®men ns• yaym ®•nmammlN we ®sV ©oxrwvUr iwm-.� wi••.• ry my YPMtlW ® oeu rw aKc. M f..Y ® rexu �v! I[P al¢1P •unn w 4aa =_ Q m vaMaa �Iv mwur n a� uraux naml ® �xorrwo •an n r•sugn auar.on v�im.q ® aw uuw © mwrt rn v mxr w nurn 0 ------ WEST 79NK EET c Kda ® j IN FATE TRUNK NIGNWRT NO. S vws[ Mx IOrta-w IM. k- 7 I 0 ®cl[e MEND TA lMl ® P. Y n. `i V4i "�s�mr v i� i �mm wi a r�cm Nir vo v�onv Om CTi s GRADING & ORAJNAGF NOTEIr.FND n C NFKA1 NOIFS SrOpN LAC$ mwmm mau[aau uI amnu e�xua aam n.w...,. xa, ..w L-7 ram'°"[ 01w"'W u.r. ,. oxa®an.��mer wmn%v..nwsuu.w�a.m rme •�r mrr n[ mmmw fw. w uww m .avxu w m•no m m x wn sa�n •r iaian.nx wn.s[ urtw.a q avnm x w ¢artarw wcmwr:inawn.a 9Mr�� __________ une..rrmwwmmmrr eeea w u.. - �u rn�nm ..rtw.re mr.or=a u�onn el 1�ml�a� •� xsil •'��• imowma o ran x n<mim..tr oar. u.a wmn a von wa v.nnr w w m v xa.0 nw �aanu arWLxauxrwrmo uanrt mrrr.a a[nw p n w was nx ��,uwm mnxm auaam w.n n _ umr WM 79N SIpEV [yp� nvtr mwm aorta-rr �� " wrvwlwul w.rrx n-wn.. r.�r xx xon...orx. wn.r rr a... €€ �r ♦ A\ y I q.I BS' LM83,(»' Ia-- m�.cr on wobwnia n ♦'wcw'xmm4ivegw.re NT 0 �nmw`i wwvrnwv w. wa ee w�mo[�ro wmno vre no.mm[�awm rvv ,orMxvr na o.awrz anovawu u.uuun �� rwe umnn ra ounw xWarmc 0 :N ! .' 4 .r: _ __rTV- xe uvrmmsrm mv.o'sa BEN O "emut m. .en.nwma ..w..axo "•°,°°'° $TA MUNK HIGHWAY NO. 5 �. nu urY.1[v^Mw.mu 1F. •r .m TRASH N 5 R DI - xre -lv r •, x ss ------------ ic �IR+2621.81'Ll � �� ease sew s n[ nw.o mm. ono auim smwmrr i �xwoax� m[000is uw�imlmmmAxYYrM.YYri[Yms�. �[ �m-w-u.ummx vpa.xra � I Ftiu N.. By C-3.0 .w rww.n.viw . .e ,lw �.. ,... ...ram..`>�`......, �. �-. .ems :..,:.."�.......:...... —.w PI n.�'Ma �..s �ti nniev � s eww NOMS s f..nn.s 4q.nw. alµ `sak ':.a.'�",..' M'S` __� ......... ............. STAI MUNN HIGHWAY NO. 5 H. �I FGFNn ®m�ul.� omv ,'tea • �•�• x •� �� =W Si ]9TM rrr^^EETtl -T�� °`annww+a.i7mm ___ _ _ _ 1 e oa wm rxau vr.m � � I °•�R nw xo va a raao •m r. ��arvfx ~ I vn�a' is lunuy w 1 I 1 I 1 I xamrorxv e 1 R - ua nmw unnu m e roo xwm xar n wnn.rta. rw euar u•n w �rcws, a .imaawrn xw rmwrox.nm ra uawwrtw emr wo •rvc mi ,• 1 I x fp -1 a,¢ e n xo.u�ww n[ ina. • w.•n a m•urt'wa � _ _ _ o ry u as nnxiuv. mnuna n ,ov lil .' amre � _ rm a iorwi n wi��• ,mw � mvmr I I I mwx mnwcia m rvwm w.su U .��io. w eimix '� _ i I <•.x: i.�u �,e n mom. � I I n[rnvox1w+a. w� x@if�no I xm � � �• I\ I II II A l ■ li' `sW bad` �� STOP LINE 6RAPNIC � .aoeue k -�J e Pa Eo AccEsslewtt srMsoL rp\ STANWROPARKING SMI. ier.orwr ' �\ SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE RAMP TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK µ 1 rma,w:r rr..0 nmo �!1 DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE @RETURNED CURB ACCE5519LE RAMP SIOEWAIXWRHCURB (GUTTER SECTION_ '�m�aw�i ms /1 ORNETHRU PI L NOSCAPE &IRRIGATION PROTECTOR .nrexu yyFmpypbnmpxwut (jp\SCREENED REFUSE ENCLOSURE FOUNWTION PU '. O" H1mGYtlRYR00 O fA 1 F ate^ �...�.�.._.. ...... me344' CONCRETE CURB A GUTTER REFUSE EN R P.armT RMTE RANP EPIAN CONCRETE DO"RO �MENT SECTON CONCRETE PRVING GRNE-THRII LANE TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL O)NnjA�TIO�JOINT ..................... saw — TRANSVERSE AADUONGITUDINAI- DOWELED CONSTRUCTION JOINT CONCRETE APRON Q TRASH ENCLOSURE LL — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- THETDJ7LS WKI 770 CONCRiTE517ASELOTS rZ KEYED COt[S; LONGITUDINAL BUTT MINT .RU =�TIONJOINT E6EANSI @ _,T J �DNT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ($3\ MUL�EDIR3R GRAPHICS n p® e � 1 1 CRO%WA�K DETAIL ENTRY DOOR FROST SIAS DETAIL \STORM W EEP HOLE DETAIL �— awErwcvrew wwn... ......v �...� O.M.Q.. �� O m� eErnaN view MENU BOARDLOOPDETECTN)N SYSTEM WILOINO DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION DETAIHr •99O'SifGtiI�O141N- MP^ 391. d F. � L TYPICAL SECTION AT INLEbCATCH BASIN DETAIL PORTABLE CONCRETE WASHOUT CONTAINER In. Mwi=w 5W ow — STABLIZED 7 M .-J % NVIE ..E ELEVAT. 4 WEST 79TH STREET R mem.a I j �°scwac P°u" �--�• _\--\``—�� `� vam mnl i mm - u°Y�vr �.:um"�'m �mi° �iim v'. vv .��'v�'xivo �"w.:a 'p _ w�am® •. am f+.onmaa uv+�R.0 wum. x�n. M/a w� na v mnw �v am.n�vww,.mewvww ouw wamv vo n �Sfth°off oocz �I fps 00 00IM omt� MUM I", 3 GNDuNMC iVJ W o AL 5 PMKiNG M, D DMA 2 sSHNB KD Pw NG o AL 4 V„ BENCH M EDGING w:L N miWVT4P 4m�Mw4 Ma N w....4a,¢raW an mrwc ,mn,w.. w.am9 ""°`'�'•'"'°'a. �i.n..M,4..aaa.w...a n, w..,wo.Rv.M ... �4, M,.,,�. ma raw Kart 4n mnw w�uw.'nTn� q'nw.w'�non fmA w mnar¢L Mna�m..o nnmeo ngmo.. wmm. mu n.nnn ma ry m�yo•Me Aiq __ _ ou. M M1 M O aIWY Rtl w 4 u.uM a anm. mvrM wu.. m nM aL m vw �a[ mxa arMaf v rttt rs-.vRuf owmw NYn a M.m wl N I.W%R aMxaa m.mLm Y.wia v.'v y.n ne4[�va�wwa w..xwm Muowfw.wa wm ur4ma mmw Il mt MLY.�OfIIW N VMf T 1PA. C o �vva ow.mnn.'.. � 4��N :dL ��u�c awmvie mm�i4 ��ux n�ir[..��vurt v�mw[�ia�unwvwr u�am4'�on yL Loom Mm:iww. m¢.4 swwwm[on.4a n�o m. 11 .._..:: Tom..:.--'Zn�.....:..�.._.r..._ ma.tloMllY flfi�uxcf `~W v,Mraevmxuu Fu=C, X 0P10TOMURIC PLAN -INITIAL w a Y as�>• v��o WEST ➢9TH SiaEEt � � ` J- � 1_ snT£ murvx HIGH.1 rvo. s Wp yJ '.:I LIN Hv ism ]'ALL HLO 10.90 Z, sb stlw W. B.W LwkbLd Tnb :E.O Trent T, sm MbMf"NW :101 STATE TliiJNK Intl WAY No s I IULII I O O Aadal Flre Truck ba T" Ttl WEST 79TH STREET ® �\ I 7 L. +f )� •--r-=- -ter..._----..-� -a-- STATE THUUN NIGH Y N b A[ 1 -I' IL'Vl l< 7 uv Pickup Truck Super Duty en TN BW L blvi Na eMnry Mµ 400 -' D-Series Size 1 LED Area Luminaire l�l Y • I IJ •�U i �. ss 1tghhng NNINka r>�n GHANHA$SENPIP ,Porr,�, FIXTURE: OD/OD1 w1r,q W.W Nohs Im Introduction d°series The modern styling of the D-Series is striking yet unobtrusive - making a bold, progressive Specifications statement even as it blends seamlessly with its environment. EPA: 1.2 ft' o INThe D-Series distills the benefits of the latest in (n11mq LED technology into a high performance, high Length: 33" efficacy, long -life luminaire. The outstanding loam) photometric performance results in sites with Width: 13" m13" L excellent uniformity, greater pole spacing and Height: 7-1/2" Fi lower power density. It is ideal for replacing 100 — (».um) 40OW metal halide in pedestrian and area lighting Weight 27lbs applications with typical energy savings of 65% (max): Otlrgl and expelled service life of over 100,000 hours. NEZOMMEMEW EXAMPLE: DSX1 LED 60C 1000 40K T3M MVOLT SPA DDBXD DSX1 LED Forward 530 530 30K 3000K(80 TTS Type l short MVOIP Shipped included Shipped Installed Shipped DDEW Dark optics mA CRl min.) US Typellshon 120 SPA Square pole PER NEMA twist -lock Installed bronze 301 30 LEDs 700 70D 40K 4000NQ0 T2M Tall 208' mountin receptzcleonly(no HS House- DBIXD Black (ON mA (RI min. medium 240r RPA Round pole mn[olsl' side v DNAXD Natural engim) 1000 1000 SOK SOOOK(70 T35 Ill short r mounting DAYS0-10Vdimmi)g shield aluminum 40C 40LEDz MA (RI) 277 WBA Wallbracket dfirer(m mntoh)' WEB Utility DWHXD White (two engines) (I A) AMBPC Amber T3M Typelll medium 347' Square polecontrollable SPUMBA S Dimmahleand terminal bock" ODBTXD Tenured 60( 00 LEDs phosp hor converted T4M 480, unhewl ROls)1 SF use dark (two n*diu medium mounting co mniolz)" (120, 77, (1Z0, Z77, home engines) TETM Foment! DS Dual switching p1 347V)N DBLBXD Tortured Rotated throw RPUMBA Round Pak 15 Pill Mounting OF ouse(e (use R08, black oP�' medium universal height mounting height" 240, DNATXD Tatra) 60C LEDs TSVS mounting adaptor' PIRH Motion sew, 480ha aluminum O short short 15ight o, nting L90 Left engines) engi TSS IypeVslon KMAB Mastarm height" opted DWHGXD textured DDBXDU mounting BL30 8i-1erel zwbdxd optics ° White T5M TypeV bracketadap- dimming, 30%11. R90 Right medium or(wedh BL50 Bidevel switched rotated T5W TypeVwide finish)° dimminh 50%11p optics NOTES '. L/THON/A one Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phc ne: &g279.6041 • Fax,770.910.1209 • n.,., I, -on a.c�f SCANNED L/GNT/JdV omit-2014Aaityeran&u9hL,j, airghu,e ed. SCANNE D Eaz..� Lumen Output Lumenvaluesarefrompiwtarne6ictaz pwfmnedinaccordancewith IESN U 79-08.O 6cros5 edtoberepresmtaerxofthecmfi9aa6washown, with thetolerancesala dby Lig4t Face AmWp.,f..may dfier as a rewlt of end+neremrmmmt and appliratim. Actwl xzttage may diner by a/-0%xhen aperabng belwean 120-48W t/-10%. Contact Ixmryfa pulamaKe daa m arry confguratims rwt shovm here. s r ]W m.1 70C 68W I 44s I s T1S 5,M0 1 0 1 78 6A24 2 0 2 % 1A53 2 0 2 1" TES 5,540 1 0 1 81 6,833 2 0 2 1W 73V 2 0 2 1W 71M 5,31A 1 0 2 M 6,611 2 0 2 97 7,147 2 0 2 1W 13$ 5,479 1 0 I 81 6,757 1 0 2 % 7,305 2 0 2 10] T3M 5,452 1 0 2 M 6,M4 2 0 2 W 7,M9 2 0 2 IV UM 5,%1 1 0 2 6,M6 2 0 2 99 1,28E 2 0 2 101 TFIM 5,318 1 0 2 M 6,633 1 0 2 % 1,111 1 0 2 105 TSVS 5,A18 2 0 0 M 7.W 3 0 0 104 7,611 3 0 1 112 T55 5,639 2 0 0 83 6,%5 2 0 0 102 7519 3 0 0 111 5,710 3 D 1 & ],012 3 0 1 1W 7,613 3 0 2 14 Tilly5551 3 0 1 82 6,BQ 3 0 2 101 7,401 3 0 2 1W (30LED5) 1000W 105W7,464 7,2M 2 0 2 0 9,168 2 0 2 B7 904 2 0 2 M 7,572 2 0 2 12 9A03 2 0 2 91 10342 2 0 2 % 7,325 2 0 2 70 9,M1 2 0 2 M IDA05 2 0 3 95 7,M 2 0 2 71 91 2 0 2 W 10,227 2 0 2 97 jT5M 7,451 2 0 2 71 9,491 2 0 2 W 10,177 2 0 2 97 2 0 2 71 9A61 2 0 2 % 10,195 2 0 2 97 7,3S1 1 0 2 70 9323 2 0 2 0 10,010 2 0 3 % 7,901 3 0 1 74 9AM 3 0 1 M 10,655 3 0 1 101 1A03 3 0 2 74 9,774 3 0 1 93 10526 3 0 1 1W 71 3 0 0 73 9,997 3 0 2 94 10,658 4 0 2 102 75W 71 3 0 2 72 9,621 4 0 2 92 1 10,M 4 0 2 % 40C 7000A 89W T1S 6,876 2 0 2 77 8,639 2 0 2 97 1 9345 2 0 2 105 T25 7,202 2 0 2 87 9,049 2 0 2 102 1 9,7M 2 0 2 110 TIM 619M 2 0 2 78 8,755 2 0 2 % 91 2 0 3 1% T3S 7,122 2 0 2 M 6,946 2 0 2 101 9,6M 2 0 2 1W TIM 7AM 2 0 2 W 1 8,905 2 0 2 1W 9,02 2 0 2 1W T4M 7,100 2 0 2 M 8,9M 2 0 2 1W 9,M9 2 0 2 IN MM 6,952 1 0 2 M 9,185 2 0 2 99 9AW 2 0 1 2 107 TSVS 7,421 3 0 0 83 91 3 0 1 105 1 11 3 0 1 1 113 TSS 7331 2 0 0 82 9.210 3 0 1 103 1 9,962 3 0 1 112 T5M 71 3 0 2 M 93M 3 0 2 105 hi 4 0 2 113 TSW 7,216 3 0 2 81 9,1166 4 0 2 102 91 4 0 2 110 I4p1�,) 1000MA 13BW T1S 9,521 2 0 2 0 11,970 2 0 2 87 1M 3 3 0 93 T25 9,972 2 0 2 A 12.5% 3 0 3 91 13,MI 3 0 3 % TIM 91 2 0 3 M 12.149 3 0 3 M 13,0113 3 0 3 % T3S 9A62 2 0 2 Il 12.418 2 0 2 W 13,311 2 0 2 97 BM 9,814 2 0 2 11 1 123% 3 0 3 W 13,367 3 0 3 96 TO 9,831 2 0 2 71 12,379 2 0 3 W 13,290 2 0 3 % TFEM 9,6M 2 0 2 1 70 12,191 2 0 3 M 13A81 2 0 3 % T5VS 10,275 3 0 1 1 74 12,937 3 0 1 M 131 1 4 0 1 1 1 101 US 11 3 0 1 1 74 12182 3 0 1 93 13,721 3 0 1 W TSM 10,2]8 4 0 2 74 12M2 4 0 2 M 13AM 4 0 2 101 TSW 9,991 4 0 2 72 "1 4 0 2 91 13,507 4 0 2 % WC 700 MA 131W T1S 10,226 2 0 2 78 12.871 3 0 3 % 13,9M 3 0 3 1% TZS 10,711 2 0 2 82 13,481 3 0 3 103 14,589 3 0 3 111 TIM 10,363 2 0 3 79 13,043 3 0 3 IN 14,115 3 0 3 IW BS 10592 2 0 2 81 13,331 2 0 2 102 14,427 3 0 3 110 T3M 10.541 2 0 2 M 13,267 3 0 3 101 14.39 3 0 3 110 T4M 10559 2 0 2 81 13,190 2 0 3 101 14,382 3 0 3 110 MM 10,398 2 0 3 79 13,07 2 0 3 IN 14,163 2 0 3 IM TM 11,036 3 0 1 M 13,8% 4 0 4 IN 15,03E 4 0 1 115 TSS 10,W2 3 0 1 83 13,721 3 0 1 105 14,949 4 0 1 113 T5M 11,039 4 0 2 M 13A% 4 0 2 1W 15A% 4 0 2 115 iSW 1 10,732 4 0 2 82 13,507 4 0 2 103 14,617 4 0 2 112 (��) IOWtM 2WW TIS 1 1I 3 0 3 67 11 3 0 3 M 19,W/ 3 0 3 91 1Z 1401 3 0 3 M 19.467 3 0 3 1 ea 19AW 3 0 3 % T21A 14,204 3 0 3 68 17A67 3 0 3 9 192M 3 0 3 92 BS 34j18 3 0 3 0 18,262 3 0 3 ® 19AV 3 0 3 IN 13M 14,418 3 0 3 0 18.173 3 0 4 V 19,591 3 a 94 TIM 1447i 3 0 3 69 18jW 3 0 3 B/ 19AM 3 0 141532 0 3 68 17,91B 3 0 4 % 193M 3 0 75V5 15,IM 4 0 1 72 19AM 4 0 1 91 20512 4 0 J92E T55 /4,%3 4 0 1 71 18,197 4 D 1 % M%3 4 0TSM 15,131 4 0 2 B 19.03 4 0 2 91 M617 5 0 T5W 14,710 4 0 2 M ISM 5 0 389 199165% Mote: Available with phosphor -converted amber LED4 lnomendature Alin These LED's produce light with 97t%>530 nor. Output can be calculated by applying a 0.7 factor to 4000 K lumen values and photometric files. ifLlrHON/A one Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • Fax: 770.918.1209 • ..av l¢hon a ccm DSx1-LED •L/GHT/NG 02011-2014Acuity Brands Lighfing,Inc All rights reserved Rev.09/1VI4 Performance Data Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Use these factors In determine relative lumen output or average ambient temperatures fuen 0d0C (32-104'1). Electrical Load OTC 32T �WYFi1 1.02 IAA 30 LOO 1.00 Q IN 0.99 60 ' i l' 530 200 1000 i(I 52 68 105 1P 208 240 M 3Sl 4B0 0.52 0.30 0.26 0.13 - - 068 039 034 0.30 (14 0.12 1.03 039 0.51 0.45 0.36 0.26 lox 50"F 20-C 68T 530 700 1000 68 89 138 0.62 0.39 0.34 0.29 023 O.7 an 031 O.H 0.38 O31 OM 135 0.M 0.67 0.58 0.42 0.31 25'C Tr"F 30X WF 4OX 104T 530 200 low 99 131 209 0.92 0.% OAS 0A2 0.31 0.24 139 0.74 OAS 0.56 045 0.32 1.98 1.14 0.99 0.W OA9 050 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance Data references the extrapolated pedermame projections for the pladome noted in a 25'C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA Ud-0 and projected per IESNA TM-21-11), To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance f rotor that covesmnds m the desired number of bpwatng hours below. For ocher lumen maintenance values, comas factory 9 MAW 5,11.0010 t%A% • • .• Tosai complete photometric report ordovmload.ies filesfor this product, visit Uthonia Lighting's D Series Area S,ze l hemepaee. Isofoctcandle plats for the DSXI LED 60C 100040K Distances are in units of mounting height (201. LEGEND 4 a a 3 a I a 1 4 4 1 1 1 a t 3 1 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 z 3 4 € 4 1 z 1 a I I I 4 , 3 4T-. __ 4 9 A ■ 0.1 k ° a ■ 0.5fc 1 _I- a q TO fi: s s � T1S z- T3N'z •� TIN H FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The sleek design of the D-Sermz Sae 1 reflects the embedded high performance LEDtedmology It is ideal for marry mmmemal and municpal applications, such as parking lots, plazas, campuses, and svee¢capes. CONSTRUCTION Singlepiece ch K aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management through conductive and ties coding. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance and future light engine upgrades -The LED driver is mounted in direct contactwlth she mstilg to Promote low operating temperature and long life. Housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental comaminants OP65). Low EPA (1IfP) for optimized pole wind loading. FINISH Exterior parts are protected by a zinc -infused Super Durable TGICthermceet powder mat finish that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi -stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish the can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. Available in both textured and noo-texured finishes. OPTICS Predsion-molded proprietary acrAic lenses are engineered for superior area lighting o ienb rtion, uniformity, and pole spacing. Light engines are available in standard 40M K (20 minimum CRO or optional W00 K (W minimum CRO or SOW K (20 CRO configurations. The D-Series Sae 1 has zero uplight and qualifies as a Nighttime Friendly^' posi meaning it is consistent with the TEED` and Green Globes- criteria for eliminating invent luplight ELECTRICAL ❑gm engine configurations consist of 30, 40 or W high -efficacy LEDs mounted to metal -core drmit boards to maximize heat dissipation and promote long Irfe (up to L96/1 DO=hours e 254C). Class 1 demonic drivers are designed to have a power factor>90%, THD <20%, and an expected life of 100,000 hours with <1%failure rate. Easily serviceable 1OW m 6kV surge protection device meets a minimum Category C Low operation per ANSVIEEE C62.41.2) INSTALLATION Included mounting block and integral arm facilitate quick and easy installabon. Stainless steel bohs fasten the mounting block securely, to poles and walls, enabling the D-Senes Size 1 to whheand up to a 3.0 G vibration load rating perANSI C136.31. The DSenes Size 1 utilizes the AERIS"a sense pole drilling pattern. Optional terminal block, tool -less entry, and NEMA photomrmol receptacle are also available. us-nNGS UL Listed for we locations. Light engines are IP66 rated; luminaire is IP65 rated. Reed for -40-C minimum ambient. U.S. Patent No. D672,492 S. International patem pending. DeognUghoz Comortium49 (DLq qualified product. Not all veruoos of this product may be DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products Uri at www.desigoights org to confirm wbidl versions are qualified. WARRANTY Fiveyear limited wanamy, Full warranty terms, located n: vc xr.amiry, rands.cam/CuetomerResourcesrerms_and_modl:. ors asp NOB: SpecificinoM Subject to change without notice. '.L/THON/A One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 8W-279.8041 a Fax 7/0.918.1209 • wwva.lithonia corn DSM El) LAGHT/NG OE11-2014Aairy&andsUghUrg,Inc AlinghCsmserved. Rev. 09/15/14 D-Series Size 1 LED Area Luminaire FIXTURE: OD2 Ute, humAe, Ni Tied Introduction d°series The modem styling of the D-Series is striking yet unobtrusive - making a bold, progressive Specifications statement even as it blends seamlessly with its environment. EPA: 12 ft7 <WW The D-Series distills the benefits of the latest in n m1 a LED technology into a high performance, high Length: 3s•' efficacy, long -life luminaire. The outstanding (Macon photometric performance results in sites with Width: 1 3" nai excellent uniformity, greater pole spacing and 7-172" lower power density. It is ideal for replacing 100— Height: 092.0 ►1 40UW metal halide in pedestrian and area lighting Weight 27IDS applications with typical energy savings of 65% (max): punso and expected service life of over 100,000 hours. • • - is is EXAMPLE: DSX1 LED 60C 1000 40K T3M MVOLT SPA DDBXD DSID LED To C Forward 530 530 30K 3000 K(80 T1S Type l short MVOLT' Shipped indoded Shipped installed Shipped DDBXD Dark I optia mA CRl min) US Typellshort 1201 A Squarepole PER NEMAIsvisi-lock installed bronze 30C 30LEDs (one 700 700 mA 40K 4000 K(70 CRl min) 12111 Typell medium 208, mounting RPA Boundpoleshield" receptacle only (no controls)' HS House- Side DBO(D Black DNAXD Natural engine) 1000 1000 SOK SOOO K(70 BS T Ill short � 2�, mounting DMG o-10V dimming aluminum 40C 40 LEDs (rwo mA (1 AI (AI) AMBP( Amber T3M Typelll 217' 347' WBA Wall bracket drher(mcarttrols)° DCR Dinernableand WB Utility terminal DWH%D wfi8e engines) medium SPUMBA Square pole controllable block" DDBTXD Tenured 60C 60 EDs phosphor converted TV Type IV 4804 unti l via ROW" (no SF Singlefure dark Ent (two medium mounting controls)' (120,277, engines) TFTM Forwdd adaptor' DS Dual switching10.. 347V)4 DBLBXD Tortured Rotated throw APUMBA Round pole Pill Motgnsecaor,8-15' DF Double Else(208• black optics' medium unlvmsal mountinghelghte 240, DNATXD Tanned 60C 60LEDs T5V5 TypeVwry mounting adaptor PIRH Motion sensor, 480V)is naturil aluminum(tm short 15-30'mouniing L90 Left engines) TypeVshort WAR Mast arm height" mtawd DWHGXD TannedTSS DDBXDU mounting BL30 6-level svitldlM optics11 white TSM WV bracketadap- dimming, 309(i11° Rightmedium tor(spttify BL50 Bi-levelsvivached Sam T5W WVwidc flnhh)I d mmg509i optics NOTES rte 08 Tossof Pole 1 Raatedoptiaonlyavadabkwith60C. DSXI sibri w4queddlling form with the AERIS-family, So" this drilling pattem when specifying odes, per the table helox. 2 AMBPC only available with, 530mA w]oOmA 3 MVOLT diner operates an ary line voltage from 12627N(50/60 H4. Specify 120. 208, 240 or 277 options onlywhen ordering with (using (SF, OF options). 0.563• DiSingle unit DM29AS tat 90' ` DM28AS 2at180' DW9AS 3at90°' 4 Not available with singgle board, 530mA product (30C 530, or 60C 530 OSL Not available with DCR, BL30 aBlSo. 5 a v lleble as a separate comb,nanon accessory: PUMBA (fimsh7 U. t.326' DM49AS 4a190— DM32AS 1,1111— 6 Requires "SPA' mounting option. M"R be ordered as a z rod acmsaiy, see Acres ories information. Fw use with 2-3/8' mast arm (rot indudtt8. ria+Ie55A 204C DM19ASDDBXD wlr,Y{ii,irt'5 'esew.eeelrcwnd,sion .srsm,a more 7 Photocell arderedandshipped as a separate line noes hoes hairy Bands controls. See accessories. Nat available with DS option. 8 MG option for 347v or 480v requires 100UnA 9 Spedvor. ROAMO enabled miner. even 0-1 N dimming upabndy; PER option required. Not available with 347 or 480V. Additional hardware and services O01PF15N PAttttell-Sk Mst-IM 11262]]VI" .Pdin°piewinY61Hi U"-'-' r'�pvv.emw9nwJM required for ROAMS deployment: must be purchased Call lA00442- NINE15CU1N u eAouelbsSLNlrcurvl'r Bp,D 6745 or email.adesidoamservicec N/A with 8130,0PIR or PIH. 10 Requires 40C or 60C. Provides 50/50 Iumimlre operation via two independent x dy NL4a0F1.311L3U Phivroll-5511wis 1.049w)" drivers; per two separate modes. N/A with PER, DCR, W 13, FIR, or PIRH. 'C xu SAMingop'1 11 Requires an additional sanctified man. Tenon Mounting Slipfitter** 12 5.no,,S,v:S�SBGR-s-ODatca�t�iRSKe� control; deem, details. 0 � N wills30Cu Raad-,me Shan lar10 lE0umt Dimming driver standard. Not available wrtb DS or, DCR. ID MX1R540(U Name -sae shield kr Q closer ,. :� " � /3 Dimming driver standard. MVOLT only Not available wrom DCR. U O USWU fdowsde shield for 60 Loser 2-W Artrx 0ASll ASI]6E0'LS1A320 Af5aR390 MTSh60 td Also available asaseparate acceso see Accessories information. ry' AsoVVTB Q PUMMmaXDU• SpurtaMmw,dpokuurmal„M- 9 bradx[adapolspeoya r 21m AiT25-IN Asti ASRt2N ASRZ326 A5RS390 ASIE-I9U 15 ratavailable withrat 16 Sirrygsfuse(Sn reqquires 120,277or 347 voltage option. Doubt fine 01F7 requires 208,240 or 480 voltage option. WAS Vli U Ma"amnma tin thaMadapN ! ASDS-190 Ams-2110, Adali-M Aorl AST35-390 AST35190 17 A assable with W LEDs (60C option) only. fspeah M1aad' 18 Requires lummaire to be specified w8{i PER optips. Qdnad and 9tipped asa sT+ v,m vhvar" nv:'tr,nvwAa separate line item from AAAy&xads f LIMHON/A One L'ithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 80099.8041 • Fax 770.918,1209 • ::.,:,.I ;honiacom L/GHT/NG 02011-2014 Acuity Brands Lighting, Irrc All rights reserved. Lumen Output Lumen valuesare from Photonnbictests performed in acmrdancewen IESWA W-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of Bn co quratmu show, within the tolerances allowed by lightirg Fads. Aeual performance mry differ as a resuh of end-iaer emirovr�ent aM applimOm. Actual wattage may di8o by H-e%when operating between 120JBP/ */-10%Corcact hnwyfo perfommance dasz marry ronfiguranas rwt sMwn here. A 7WIM 68W5,41 r a 5%% 1 0 1 ft 6AM 2 0 2 % 1953 Z 0 2 IN SAW 1 0 1 81 6,833 2 0 2 1W 7M 2 0 2 1W 713�. 53W 1 0 2 n 6,611 2 0 2 97 7,147 2 0 2 1W 5,419 1 0 1 81 6,79 1 0 2 M 7,305 2 0 2 107 5,452 1 0 2 W 6,724 2 0 2 W 7,M9 2 0 2 1U] 1 0 2 W 6,7M 2 0 2 M 7282 2 0 2 107 5378 1 0 2 19 61533 1 0 2 96 7,IM 1 0 2 1W TM S,7W 2 0 0 M 1A40 3 0 0 IM 7411 3 0 1 112 T55 516" 2 0 0 83 6,955 2 0 0 102 7519 3 0 0 111 T5M 5,710 3 0 1 8/ 7.M2 3 0 1 1M 7,613 3 0 2 112 TSW 5551 3 0 1 82 6,M7 3 0 2 101 7,401 3 0 2 10A (30IFgs) Mialk 105W T1S 72B 2 0 2 69 9,IW 2 0 2 B! 9A14 2 0 2 % US 7572 2 0 2 72 9A03 2 0 2 91 10,10 2 0 2 % RM 7,3M 2 0 2 70 9,291 2 0 2 88 10005 2 0 3 % T35 1,488 2 0 2 71 9,4% 2 0 2 W 10,727 2 0 2 91 13M 7,451 2 0 2 71 9,IW 2 0 2 % 10,17/ 2 0 2 97 TV 7,4W 2 0 2 71 9,07 2 0 2 W 10,1% 2 0 2 97 TFTM 7,351 1 0 2 70 9,323 2 0 2 W 10AW 2 0 3 % TM 7"1 3 0 1 11 9,8M 3 0 1 M 10,655 3 0 1 111 T55 7.W3 3 0 2 74 9,774 3 0 1 93 10,526 3 0 1 1W TSM 7,M7 3 0 0 73 9,897 3 0 2 M /0,658 4 0 2 102 TSW 1M 3 0 2 72 9,621 4 0 2 92 10,W 4 0 2 % 40C NOW 89W 11S 6.876 2 0 2 n 8,639 2 0 2 97 9,9/5 2 0 2 105 T25 7,202 2 0 2 81 9.049 2 0 2 10) 9,M8 2 0 2 110 T2M 6,M 2 0 2 78 8,755 2 0 2 % 9,169 2 0 3 IW T35 7,122 2 0 2 W I'MB 2 0 2 101 1 9AT9 2 0 2 1W TIM 7,088 2 0 2 W OAS 1 0 2 1W 1 9,632 2 0 2 1% UM 7,1W 2 0 2 W 819M 2 6 2 1W 9,M9 2 0 2 IN MIA 6,M2 1 0 2 79 8,785 2 0 Z % 9,S02 2 0 2 107 T5VS 7,421 3 0 0 83 9,323 3 0 1 105 LOAM 3 0 1 113 T5S 7331 2 9 0 82 9,210 3 0 1 103 9,%2 3 0 1 112 T5M 7,423 3 0 2 83 9,326 3 0 2 IDS 10A87 4 0 2 113 TSW 7,216 3 0 2 81 91W 4 0 2 101 1 9AW 4 0 2 110 (QDDs) 1000MOA 133W T15 9,S21 2 0 2 69 11,970 2 0 2 81 1 1201 3 3 0 93 US 9,972 2 0 2 72 12,558 3 0 3 91 1 13,41 1 3 0 1 3 1 % T2M 9,648 2 0 3 M 12,149 3 0 3 N 1 13,043 3 0 3 95 T35 9.962 2 0 2 71 12,419 2 0 2 1 % 1 13,331 2 0 2 97 TA 9,814 2 0 2 71 12358 3 0 3 1 W 13,267 3 0 3 % T4M 9A31 2 0 Z 71 14379 2 0 3 % 13,29) 2 0 3 % TFTM 901 2 0 2 M 12,191 2 0 3 88 13,0117 2 0 3 % TM 10,275 3 0 1 74 12,937 3 0 1 % 13,891) 4 0 1 101 T55 10,1% 3 0 1 74 12,782 3 0 1 93 13,721 3 0 1 W TSM 10,278 4 0 2 74 12,%2 4 0 2 % 13,891 4 0 2 101 T5W 9.%1 4 0 2 72 12X 4 0 2 91 13,%7 4 0 2 % IW m4 131W T1S 10326 2 0 2 78 12.971 3 0 3 % 13.929 3 0 3 1W 72S 10)11 2 0 2 BZ 13,481 3 0 3 103 14X 3 0 3 111 TZA1 10363 2 0 3 79 13,043 3 0 3 1W 14,115 3 0 3 108 T3S 10592 2 0 2 81 13,331 2 0 2 102 14,427 3 0 3 110 T3M 10MI 2 0 2 W 13,167 3 0 3 101 1439 3 0 3 110 TO 1059 2 0 2 81 13A90 2 0 3 101 1438Z 3 0 3 110 TFTM 103% Z 0 3 A 13A81 2 0 3 1W 1/,163 2 0 3 108 TM 11,0% 3 0 1 & 13A% 4 0 4 1% 15,03E 1 0 1 115 TSS lox 0 1 83 13)21 3 0 1 M t1A/9 1 0 1 113 TSM t1A39 / 0 2 8/ 13A94 4 0 2 1% 15,0% 1 0 Z 115 T5W 10,732 4 0 2 W 13.907 4 0 2 103 l4A17 4 0 2 112 (W LUX) 1WO0tA NNW T1S 14A17 3 0 3 61 17,632 3 0 3 M 19M 3 0 3 91 US 14A81 3 0 3 M ISI 3 0 3 N MIS 3 0 3 % TZM M3M 3 0 3 9 17,167 3 0 3 M 192M 3 0 3 92 T35 14518 3 0 3 69 1/i62 3 0 3 87 19,681 3 0 3 M Bill11,448 3 0 3 018.1fl 3 0 4 87 19,591 3 0 4 M RM 14,473 3 0 3 69 18,2W 3 0 3 v 19AM 3 1 0 1 1 1 M TFTM 14,,253 2 0 3 68 17,928 3 0 4 N 193M 3 1 0 1 1 1 92 TM 1511P 4 0 1 72 19AD 4 0 1 91 M512 4 1 0 1 1 1 9s TSS 11,M3 4 0 1 71 18.M 4 0 1 % 20763 4 0 1 97 TSM 15,131 1 0 2 n 19,033 4 0 2 91 1Q517 S O 3 M TSW 14,710 1 1 1 0 2 M 19,503 5 0 3 89 19,946 5 0 3 1 95 Note: Available with phosphor -converted amber LED's(nomendature AM8PC) These LED's produce light with W+%>530 nm. Output can be calculated by applying a 0.7 factor to 4000 K lumen values and photometric files. '. LMNON/A One Lithonia Way a Conyers. Georgia 30312 a Phone: 8W.279.8041 a Fan 770.918,1209 a www.6thonia. corm D981-LED L/GNT/NG ® 2011-2114 Awity Brands Lighting, Inc All rights reserved. Rine 09/15/14 IPerformance Data Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Use these factors to dam inerelativelumenoutPmforaverageambienttemperatures from 040C 13210aT7. Electrical Load ofM I"' (1;i rn_I W ors 0Y 3Yf 1 1.02 101 1.00 Trail 1.00 0.99 3) 40 W 530 700 1" 52 64 105 1 0.52 0.68 1.03 030 0.39 039 026 1 0.51 023 0.30 0.45 - 1 1 - 0.17 026 10Y 507 10Y MIT 530 7W 1000 68 89 138 0.67 a39 0.34 1 023 0.89 031 a." 0.38 031 1.35 01 OA7 i 047 0.17 022 034 25-C 7 F sox 861 40Y INT 5" 7W 1000 99 131 209 0.97 0% 0.0 0A2 031 1.29 0.74 1 OS6 1 1." 1.14 1 1 0.69 021 032 OSO Projected LED Lumen Maintenance Data references the extrapolated performance prgectiens for Oe platfe mnoted ma 25DC ambient, based re 10,000 hours of LED testing Rested per IESNA 1M-80-0g and pme oat Per IESNA TA4-21-11). To calculate, UF, use the lumen maintenance factor that smaspords to the devred number of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, Conran factory �® 0 25,0110 MIM 100,000 IA 095 093 Octl 1A p.99 0.98 Odl6 I ffjflnC• .• _ To see complete photometric reports or download.ie;filesfor this product, aii Lithonia Lightings D-Sedes Area Size l homepage. Isafinci die plots for the DSXI LED 60C 10DO 40K Distances are in units of mounting height=. LEGEND 4 2 2+ o h 2 s 4 4 z 2+ o h z z 4 Its4 z 2 1 o 1 2 1 4 4 z z a 4 ■ I__. 0.1 fC . 0.5 f< 2 . -° z. z • E O T3M &u T4M - __- FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The sleek design of the D-Senes Sae 1 reflects the embedded high performance LED technology h is ideal for many, commencial and municipal applications, such a parking lots, plazas, campuses, and sveehcapes. CONSTRUCTION Singlepiece die -cart aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management though conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance and future light engine upgrades. The LED driver is mounted in direct contact with the mating to promote low operating temperature and long life. Hour ng is completely sealed against manure and environmental contaminants fIP65l. Lase EPA (12111 for optimized pole wind loading. FINISH Exterior pares are protected by a zinNnfu mcl Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder mar finish that provides supenor resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled mulLLstage Process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cmdriog or peeling. Available in Loth textured and non-teMured fishes. OPTICS Precision -molded proprietary acrylic lenses are engineered for superior area lighting distribution , uniformity, and pole spacing. Ught engines are available in standard 4000 K (70 minimum CR0 or optional 3000 K (W minimum CR0 or 50DO K (70 CR0 configurations. The D-Series Size 1 has zero uplight and qualifies as a Nighttime Friendly'"' product, meaning it is consistent with the LEEO and Green Globes- criteria for eliminating wasteful upllght. ELECTRICAL Light engine configurations consist N 30, 40 or 60 high -efficacy LEDs mounted to m rtapcom orott boards to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (tip to L96110g000 hours at 25°C). Class 1 electronic drivers are designed to have a paver factor>9M THD <20%. and an ea,mcmd Ice of 1Og000 hours with <I%failure rare. Easily, serviceable 1dN or 6kV surge Protection device meets a minimum Category C Law operation per ANSWEEE C62.41.2) INSTALLATION Included mounting block and integral arm facilitate quick and easy immllation. Stainless steel bolts fasten the mounting block securely to poles and walls, enabling the D-Series Sim 1 to withstand up to a 10 G vibration load rating per ANSI C136-31. The D-Senes Sue 1 utilizes the AERIS^'series pole drilling Former. Optional terminal Nock, tooNess entry. and NEMA photocontrol receptade are also available. LISTINGS UL Listed for wet locations. Light engines are IP66 rated; lummaire is IP65 rated. Rated for -0fYC minimum ameem. U.S. Patent No. D672,492 S. International patent pending. Designs-i Consortium® (Di qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be Di qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Produces List a wv-deshgnlights org to confirm which versions are qualified. WARRANTY Fiveyear limited ammunty Full wananty terns located at: .v22w.acuitybrands coo/CustomerResowcez/iermz_and conditons.aspx Nob: Spscifiotions subject to eninge without notice. '. L/TNGN/A One Uthonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • Fax: 770.918.1209 • wwwm .Imoa com DSX74ED L/0N)7NG G2011-2014AmityBrands UghimiInc All rights rameed. Rev.09115714 IA L/THON/A LIGHT/NGs FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION — Weldable -grade, hot -rolled, commercial -quality carbon steel tubing with a minimum yield of 55,000 psi Ill-gaugel. or 50,000 psi (7- gauge) Uniform wall thickness of .125' or .188'. Shaft is one-piece with a full- length longitudinal high -frequency electric resistance weld. Uniformly square in cross-section with flat sides, small corner radii and excellent torsional qualities. Available shaft widths are 4, 5 and 6 inches. Anchor base is fabricated from hot -rolled carbon steel plate conforming to ASTM A36, that meets or exceeds a minimum -yield strength of 36,000 psi. Base plate and shaft are circumferentially welded top and bottom. Base cover is finished to match pole. A handhole having nominal dimensions of 3' x 5' for all shafts. Included is a cover with attachment screws. Top cap provided with all drill -mount poles. Fasteners are high -strength galvanized, zinc -plated or stainless steel. Finish: Must specify finish. Grounding: Provision located immediately inside handhole rim. Grounding hardware is not included (provided by others). Anchor Bolts: Top portion of anchor bolt is galvanized per ASTM A-153. Made of steel rod having a minimum yield strength of 55,000 psi. Catalog Number TYPICAL POLE FOR FIXTURE TYPE: OD, OD1, Notaa OD2 is Anchor Base Poles SSS SQUARE STRAIGHT STEEL ORDERING INFORMATION Lead times will vary depending on options selected. Consult with your sales representative. Example: SSS 20 5C DM19 DDB ass 25 5C Series Nominal fixture Nominal shaft base size/ Mounting' Options Finish' mounting height wall thickness SSS Tenon mauntina Shinned installed cobas 10-39 feet ISee back yage.l PT Open top lase back page.) T20 2-3/8'O.D.(2'NPS) T25 2-1/8.OAQ-1/r NPSI HANDHOLE ORIENTATION T30 3-112-0.D.(3'NPS) C T35 4'O.D.(3-lrCNPS) Drill mountinoz DM19 1 at 90° Dmtze z at 1eo° D 9 OM28PL 2 at 180° with one side plugged DM29 2 at 90' DM39 3 at 90' A DM49 4 at 901 Drill Handhole AERIS" IOMERO- mountina° DM19AS tat 90° NOTES: UM29AS 2 at ISO- 1 When ordering tenon mounting and drill mounting for the tame DM29AS 2 at 90' pole, follow this example: DM28/T20. The combination includes a DM3ypg 3 at 90' required extra handhole. DMWS Oat 901 2 The drilling template to be used for a particular luminaire depends A RISnr S ,aoand drill mo ntina2.s on the luminaire that is used. Refer to the Technical Data Section DMISAST 1 at 90° of the Outdoor Binder for Drilling Templates. OM28AST 2 at 180° 3 Insert'1' or'7 to designate fixture size: e.g. DMISAST2. OM29AST 2 at 90° 4 Specify location and orientation when ordering option. DM39AST_ 3 at 90° For 1st'z': Specify the height in feet above base of pole. DM49AST_ 4 at 90° Example: Sit =S and 20ft=20 OM RD" S,.mend drill For 2nd'x': Specify orientation from handhole (A,B.C,DI mount xa no Refer to the Handhole Orientation diagram above. DM19MRT_ 1 at 90° 5 Horizontal arm is 18" a 2-3/9' O.D. tenon standard. DM28MRT_ 2 at 190° 6 Combination of tenon -top and drill mount includes extra handhole. DM29Mm_ 2 at 90° Additional colors available; see or DM39MRT_ 3 at 90- Architectural Architectural Colors brochure (Form No. 794.31. Powderfinish (Form No. 794.3). Powder fins h DM49MRT 4 at 90° — standard. VAB Less anchor bolts DOB Derk bronze VD Vibration damper own White TP Temper proof DBL Black HI-18SIex Horizontal arm bracket DW Medium bronze II fiature)45 DM Natural aluminum FOLm Festoon oudet less GALV Galvanized finish electrical' CPL12M I/T couplingz Classic colors CPl34n 3/4' coupling' D Sandstone CPLI xx 1' coupling' DOC Charcoal gray NPLl2u IfT threaded nipple' OTG Tennis green NPL34u 31C threaded nipple' OBB Bright red DSB Steel blue NPLIxx V threaded nipple4 EHHu Extra handholets Architectural colors (powder finish)' Outdoor Sheet #.Pole-SSS PL-320 SSS Square Straight Steel Poles TECHNICAL INFORMATION EPA (ft') with 1.3 gust Catalog Number Nominal shaft len th(feet) Pole Shaft Size tin xft) Wall Thickness )inches) Gauge 80 mph Max. wei ht 90 mph Max. wei ht 100 mph Max weight Bolt Circle )inches) Bolt Size (in.xin.xin.) Approximate ship weight (pounds) SSS 10 4C 10 4.0 x 10.0 0.125 11 30.6 765 23.8 595 18.9 473 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 75 SSS 12 4C 12 4.0 x 12.0 0.125 11 24.4 610 18.8 470 14.8 370 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 90 SSS 14 4C 14 4.0 x 14.0 0.125 11 19.9 498 15.1 378 11.7 293 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 100 SSS 16 4C 16 16.0 0.125 11 15.9 398 11.8 295 8.9 223 8--9 3/4 x 1 B x 3 115 SSS 18 4C 18 x 18.0 0.125 11 12.6 315 9.2 230 6.7 16B 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 125 SSS 20 4C 2D x 20.0 0,125 11 9.6 240 6.7 167 4.5 150 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 140 SSS 20 4G 20 x 20.0 0.188 7 14.0 350 11.0 275 8.0 200 8--9 314 x 30 x 3 198 SSS 20 5C 20 x 20.0 0.125 11 17.7 443 12.7 343 9.4 235 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 185 SSS 20 5G 20 x 20.0 0.188 7 28.1 703 21.4 535 16.2 405 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 265 SSS 25 4C 25 x 25.0 0.125 11 4.8 150 2.6 100 1.0 50 8--9 3/4 x 18 x 3 170 SSS 25 4G 25 x 25.0 0.188 7 10.8 270 7.7 188 5.4 135 8--9 3/4 x 30 x 3 245 SSS 25 5C 25 Jxl x 25.0 0.125 11 9.6 245 6.3 157 3.7 150 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 225 SSS 25 5G 25 x 25.0 0.188 7 18.5 463 13.3 333 9.5 238 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 360 SSS 30 4G 30 x 30.0 0.188 7 6.7 168 4.4 110 2.6 65 8--9 3/4 x 30 x 3 295 SSS 30 5C 30 x 30.0 0.125 11 4.7 150 2.0 50 -- -- 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 265 SSS 30 5G 30 x 30.0 0.188 7 10.7 267 6.7 167 3.9 100 10--12 1 x 36 x 4SSS 30 6G 30 x 30.0 0.188 7 19.0 475 13.2 330 9.0 225 11--13 1 x 36 x 4 520 SSS 35 5G 35 x 35.0 0.188 7 5.9 150 2.5 100 - -- 10--12 1 x 36 x 4 440 SSS 35 6G .x 35.0 0.188 7 12.4 310 7.6 190 4.2 105 11-13 1 x 36 x 4 540 SSS 39 6G 39 6.0 x 39.0 0.188 7 7.2 180 3.0 75 - -- 11--13 1 x 36 x 4 605 BASE DETAIL pi 78. 19 Pole Data Shaft Bolt Bolt Anchor boft base circle projection Base Template Anchor bolt and template size A B square description description number 4'C 8-1/2' 2-3/4'-4' 8' ABTEMPLATE PJ50004 AB18-0 ABSSS-4C 4'G 8-1/2' 2-3/4'-4' 8' ABTEMPLATE PJ50004 AB30-0 ABSSS-4G 5' 10'-12' 3-3/8'-4' 11' ABTEMPLATE PJ50010 AB36-0 ABSSS-5 6' ll'-13' 3-3/8'-4' 12-1/2' ABTEMPLATE PJ50011 AB36-0 N/A IMpOBTANT INSTALLATION NOTES: • Do not erect poles without having fixtures installed. • Factory -supplied templates must be used when setting anchor bolts. Lithonia Lighting will not accept claim for incorrect anchorage placement due to failure to use Lithonia Lighting factory templates. • If poles are stored outside, all protective wrapping must be removed immediately upon delivery to prevent finish damage. • I.Ahonia Lighting is not responsible for the foundation design. IMPMANT: • These specifications are intended for general purposes only. Lithonia reserves the right to change material or design, without prior notice, in a continuing effort to upgrade its products. IA L/THON/A LIGHT/NGIr An�McuftB andsCompany Sheet #: Pole-SSS V 994-2010 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Bev. 11/11/10 Lithonia Lighting Outdoor One Lithonia Way, Conyers, GA 30012 Phone:770-922-9000 Fax: 770-918-1209 www.lhhoma.com Ift L/THON/A L/GHnyva FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE For entrances, stairwells, corridors and other pedestrian areas. CONSTRUCTION Rear housing is rugged, corrosion -resistant, die-cast aluminum. Front cover is one-piece UV -resistant injection molded polycarbonate, internally painted. Cap- tive external hardware is specially treated for corrosion resistance and includes slotted hex -head and tamperproof fasteners. FINISH Dark bronze (OOB) corrosion -resistant polyester powder. OPTICAL SYSTEM One-piece die -formed reflector is diffused aluminum. Refractor is clear UV stabi- lized polycarbonate. Front cover is sealed and gasketed to inhibit the entrance of outside contaminants. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Ballast Metal halide: high reactance, high power factor. HPS: 35S, 50S, 70S, 120V are reactor, normal power factor. LOOS 120V is reactor, high power factor. High reactance, high power factor (XHP) optional for 50S, 70S and TOGS, 12OV. 208, 240, 277,347 and TB are standard XHP. Ballasts are 100%factorytested. ULlisted 66OW, 600V and 4kV pulse rated. All components are heat -linked directly to the cast housing for maximum heat dissipation. Socket Porcelain, horizontally oriented medium -base socket with copper alloy, nickel -plated screw shell and center contact INSTALLATION Mount to any vertical surface or to a 4' round square outlet box. Back access through gasketed slot Top wiring access through 1/2' threaded conduit entry. Through -wiring requires use of a conduit tee. Photocells are field -installable. LISTING UL listed for wet locations. IP65 rated. UL Listed to US and Canadian safety stan- dards (see Options). NOM Certified (see Optional. Note: Specifications subjeato change without notice. Catalog Number Notes Type OK Specifications Height 10'(25.4cm) Width: 11-1/2' (292cm) Depth: 8-15/16' (22.7cm) `Weight 101bs.(4.53kg) -Weight as configured example below Mini Wall -Packs I� METAL HALIDE 50-10OW HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 35-I OOW ORDERING INFORMATION For shortest lead times, configure product using standard options (shown in bold). TWA Series Wattage TWA Metal halide LEND 70M loom High pressure sodium 35S' 50S 70S 100S Example: TWA 50M 120 LPI Voltage Ballast Fnish Lamp10 Options 12D 208' 240' 277 (blank) Magnetic Shipped CWI Constantwatt- age isolated XHP High reac- installed in fixture SF Single fuse(120, 2T7, 347V) OF Double fuse(208,24OV) (blank) Dark LPI Lamp bronze included DNA Natural L/LP Lass lamp aluminum 347 TB3 23050HZ" NOTES: 1 12DV only. 2 Must specify CWI in Canada. 3 Optional muld-tap ballast(120,208,240, 277V). In Canada H2D, 277, 347VI ships as 120/347. 4 Consult factory for available wattages. 5 Optional for 12DV HPS only INa 35S). 6 Maximum allowable wattage lamp included. 7 Not available with TB. 8 May be ordered as an accessory as TWAW6 U. 9 Finish applied to housing only. 10 Must be specified. tance(lag), EC Emergency circuit` DBL Black high power DRS Quartz restrike systems DMB Medium factor, CSA Listed and labeled bronze to comply with DWH White Canadian Standards DSS Sandstone NOM NOM Certified' CR Enhanced PE Photocell' corrosion - resistance' Shipped separatehr CRT Non-stick WE Wire guard protective coating' Outdoor Sheet t. TWA-M-S_O BM-600 IA L/THON/A L/a6HT/N(Ga FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE— Fa recreation areas, parking Ions, building faodes, odes CONSTRUCTION — NEMA heaWduty conmadon. Combined, lowproile dent Aluminum having and from bezel. Front bend hhirgedfaeasyremwalva poytiulpwrr htgai designsSealedLryamepleeboMMhiglHemperatue sN(arregasket. Lens: Impact -resistant, thermal and shock -resistant dear tempered glass. Finish: Standard finish is dark bronze (DOB) momp on resistant pohester powder. With addmonal ahm ertural (don OPTICS —Anodized aluminum refienor provides highly emdent rectangular beam union. Optic chamber sealed to Inhibit entrance of outside mmaminann ELECTRICAL —Ballast: Nigh pressure sodium: l SOWis high reactance, high powerfada. Consta ilinnageamotrans- former for 200-400W. Metal hat ide:1 SOW is high reactance, high power factor and is standard with pulse-stan ignitor technology. -SCWA" not required. Constant wattage amotransformer fa 175-aOOW. Super CWA (pulse man balWn), 88%eficient and USA legislation compliant, is required for metal halide 15140OW (SCWA option) for US shipments only. CIA, NOM or INTL required for probe gain shipments outside of the US. Rise -son ballast (SCWq required for 200W 32OW, or 35OW. Ballast is 10096faaatytmed. Socket: Porcelain, mumnially-onented, mogul base socket wish copper alloy, nickelpwted grew shell and antes contact. UL lined ISDOW, 11140 p.Ase rated. INSTALLATION—Comosion-reostant, heavy-duty, painted steel mounting yoke standard; die-cast Integral Vernon slighter optional. All external sloned hex -head screws specially coated for cmmsion-resistance. LISTINGS —Listed and labeled to UL Standards. Uned and labeled to(SA standards (see Options). NOM Cenfxd (see Options). UL lined for 2S°C ambleng 40%for 250M and belowor 1 S05 and below UL listed for wet Imoldrat.IP65 rated. Note: Sped6catlons subject to change without ounce. Catalog Number 00 Notes Type Floodlighting TFR METAL HALIDE: 15OW- 40OW i PRESSURE SODIUM: 15OW - 40OW SpeCffKOIWS Height 10-1R (26.7) Width: 17-5/8(44.8) (8L/I Depth: 12-3/4(32.4) -Wright 27 lbs(112 kg) ° EPA: 1.3ft' 17-57a 10.3/4 144.81 Ina) 'Weight as(onfigured in example below. All dimensions are Inches (centimeters) unless otherwise spe(iM1ed. ''r ' r' - ' For shortest lead times configure product using standard options (shown In bold). Example: TFR400M TATB S(WA LPI TFR Series Wattage Distribution Voltage Ballast Mounting TFR Metal halide Ceramic 120 (Wank) Magnetic ballast Shipped installed hayed seoaratel; ® 1SOM me hie RB (6)(6) 208' CWI (Instant wattage isolated (blank) Yoke EY Extended yoke" 1751W 1SOMHC RC (SL5) 240' AAvst4/i O Is Integral slipbttn FRW8 Radiuswall bracket' loom' High roessure 277 ......C.�-� (2-3/8'ODtm ) FSAB Steel angle bracket " SCWA Su SCWA ulsestart bat P a 0M' sodium' 34T FSPB Steel square polebracket° 32 320M' 1505 480' Ffi Tenon sli fitter P (2-3/8'to2-7/8"OD Ni Forshipnentsto US. territarks, 35OMa 250S SCWA nmM be specified to complywNh tenon)' 400S 230SOH2s USA, FWPB Wood mounting bracket" "M Finish" Law Shipped installed in fixture (F (harcoalfilter Shooed seoaratelv'r (Wank) Dark bronze LPI Lamp included SF Single huge(120,2771 (SA Listed and labeled to(anply WG Wire guard"" DNA Natural aluminum L/LP Lesslamp OF Double fuse(208,240,48OV)14 with (SA standards VG Vandal guard"!' DBL Black E( Emergenrydreuto NOM NOM Certified' UV Upper visor' rn Dale Medium bronze ORS s INTL Available for MN robe start Quartz restrike system' P DWN White PER NEMecepta-lock photoelec- shipping outside the U.S. FV Ullmann" (R Enhanced corrosion trio receptacle" REG(I California Tile 20 eNec0ve PE1 NEMA twist -lock photaontrol (120, 2081 resistance (62 216-35EO cad prevnred I/l/02010 Pi NEMA twist -lock photocontrol(347V) CRT Non-stickprotective C42 2-14-3 SEO cad prewred PE4 NEMA twist -lock photocontrol(48OV) mafing" Q2 Y12-3 SEO cad prewired PE7 NEMA twist -lock phodicontrol 917V) SC Shortingczpfor PERoption Notes 7 Must specify CWl for use In Canada. 15 Maximum alliMe merge lamp inducted. 1 175M SCWA not awl Use won 48M.. 8 OptWnal mum -tap ballast(120, 2W, 240,2771n. 16 Photocell not Included. 2 These wattages do not comply wth cannot line 20 regulations. In Canada 120,277,347V; ships as 120/347. 17 Prefix win IN when adored as an accessory. Field modification 3 Mug order SIVA. 9 Corsw6 factory for available wastages_ required unless Ordered sigh finure. 4 These wattages require the REG(l option to be chosen for shipments 10 May be Ordered as an accessary. 18 See wwwlimaniscom/ardaolorx for a IIIdonal color options. Imo(aaorma for Title 20 compliance. 250M REG0 in not ava8abw 11 Must specify final when Ordered as an accessory. 19 Black finish only. in 347 car 480V. 12 Yoke mounting only. 20 Moo specify. ULP na awiable with MNC. 5 Not available with SCWK 13 Requires IS or HS shipmer. 6 Not awhble with 150S. 14 Must spedly voltage. Not available with l8. OUTDOOR TFR-M-S P5642 SERIES Fixture Type: OL Location: Contact: LED Wall Mount - Wet Location PROGRESSLEE Specifications: P5642-30/30K Description: Images: The P5642 Series are ideal for a wide variety of interior and exterior applications including residential and commercial. The Cylinders feature a 12oV alternating current source and eliminates the need for a traditional LED driver. This modular approach results in an encap sulated luminaire that unites performance, cost and safety benefits. Construction: A I Powdercoated Antique Bronze ( 20), White (-30), Black (-31), Metallic Gray (-82) ■ Die cast aluminum construction Flicker free dimming to 10% brightness with most ELV type dimmers (See Dimming Notes) • Covers a standard 4" recessed outlet box • Mounting strap for outlet box included Performance: Number of Modules Input Power Input Voltage Input Frequency Lumens/LPW CCT CRI Life EMI/RFI Min. Start Temp Max. Operating Temp Warranty Labels Catalog number. Base P5642 2 29W per module 120V i 2000/68 (LM-79) PER MODULE 3000K 90 60,000 (L70/TM-21) FCC Title 47, Part 15. Class B 30o C 30o C 5 yrs. cCSAus certified for wet locations Finish 20 -Antique Bronze 30- White 31-Black 82 - Metallic Gray Color Temp CRI 30K - 31 90 CRI Dimensions: A 1 r 6" 8" B Extends H/CTR 8-7/8- 8" L I A For more information visit our websde: wwwprogresslighting.com Progress Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 P5642 SERIES LED Wall Mount • Wet Location PROGRESS P5642-30/30K Dimming Notes: P5642 is designed to be compatible with many Electronic Low Voltage (ELV-Reverse Phase) controls. The following is a partial list of known compatible dimmer controls: Electronic Low Voltage ELV Reverse Phase Controls Lutron Diva Series (Part Number DVELV-3oo) Lutron Nova T Series (Part Number NTELV-;oo) Lutron Vierti Series (Part Number VVELV-600) Lutron (Part Number MAELV-6co) Lutron (Part Number SPELV-600) Leviton (Part Number AWRMG-EAV7) Digital type dimmers are not recommended. Dimming capabilities will vary depending on the dimmer control, load, and circuit installation. Always refer to dimmer manufacturer instructions or a controls specialist for specific requirements. Dimmer control brand names where identified above are trade names or registered trademarks of each respective company. For more information visit our website: wwwprogresslighting.com Progress Lighting- 701 Millennium Boulevard - Greenville, SC 29607 ""a 94a-fKA =I 48' Channel Letters 60' Channel Letters 60' Channel Letters Pylon Sign Directional Enter wl Logo, arrow Directional D Thru w/ Logo, arrow Drive Thru Clearance Bar ® Drive Thru Menu Board/Canopy Drive Thru Menu Board/Canopy Post] Panel - Pedestrian Crosswalk DOT- Handicapped Parking DOT- Stop Sign DOT- Do Not Enterl Stop m DOT- Do Not Enter PosV Panel- Curbside Delivery Flag Pole CITY OFCHANrIAS3U I RE NED MAR 18 2015 r)I IANHAISEI PLANNING, OV; rp Chanhassen FSU SCANNED it37.674, hi-gv. ual channel Wdm ally Illuminated LED sign to grade . 16W of sign to grade 1Y-4' p Front Elevation (West) Scale: 1/8' = V-O' STEMS Allowable Square Footage thla Elevation: Actual Square Footage tW Elevation: /\ a%I'^ Gent. Chkk-Fg-A 0m2Y16 OL5 DebD7e RevifeO Al LoceWn . n m iH .aw 5 (., e • Site #: UeSflR Addre: MSWee79thStreet 6 RmA3 Ad2 DSon, `- R Chanhassen MN 65317 Chanhassen FSU 60"Chick-Ll-A Individual channel letters - RevrtM lri Intemally Illuminated LED 58.75 Top of Npo to graft a 1T-11' Bottom of sign to graft a 17.11- Right Elevation (Southl Scale: W32- = 1'-D' aIk•� Client: Chtok-FIM mro2QO16 nel ReMen s JH rw „m.,ry.inr nw«,y ma�w nrcm. s4��im uxwwm uywa.i.e aaw m�..,4� is i t �.j 1 • Sib #: 0 2d/0312018 Deleted D7 B DB Revised M La ion Fen JH iWflreae: G45 Weit 79M SOleef 445 W 0117aO18 U3/1]I3016 U eted A3 Removed A3 Added 2 W S na JH ( /VG/IILX//�rx'C- Chanheeeen, MN 55317 �nnU �ro wn��bay"«.iz� Chanhassen FSU I 98' 3' Left Elevation (North) Scale: Y32" = 1'-0" Allowable Square Footage this Elevation: - Aclual5quar¢Foolage this ElBvatlon: _ Client: Chick-FY-A 01N]Y1018 0 3IN18 INtB -ml Rentl Delete l DT d Dd Re ., M LocationSit JH rm. mnamnaaroo,�o�nv ornome ..m � n wa+�a��'Ni� �! t btl dlleRlen RamweE A3 AEEetl3D9 Sion, JH JH does: 445Wes AEtlrM6: N5 W0a1791h Street_ OL1T 16 Chanhmroan, MN 56317 Chanhassen FSU rorto I W Chick-01-A Individual channel letters In[emally Illuminated LED 58.75 Top of sign to We • 16'-0' Bottom of elpn to p7ede • if'•P Rear Elevation (East] Scale: 116" = 7.-0. Variance Required 1: 129.61 Formula- 19' x 52.5 = 99T5 x 13% 59.75 48- chick -tile Individual channel letters Internally Illuminated LED 37.67 Top of sign wgrade • IV-V Bottom of sign to grade - 12'4' rna Roaon I u.ba Ey IINDE RANKERS LAaeaAMIRM3. INC. V .M Gm iM MM' r White LEDs (X) 60w Transformer Total Amps: X.XX (1) 20 amp 120V Circuit Req. This sign Is to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code. 1) Grounded and bonded per NEC 600.71NEC 250 2) Existing branch circuit in compliance with NEC 600.5, not to exceed 20 amps 3) Sign Is to be UL listed per NEC 600.3 4) UL disconnect switch per NEC 600.6- required per sign component before leaving manufacturer' 'For multiple signs, a disconnect is permitted but not required for each section .•o& WM Sian Layout Detail Scale: 12- = P-0' 1. Existing Facade. Brick 2..D40 Aluminum letter returns painted to match SW 96108'Latte' 3..125' x 1' Mm cap to match red 4. 0.080' aluminum backs (interior of sign can painted white for maximum illumination) 5. Red LEDs 6. 3116' Red Acrylic faces 7. Waterproof disconnect switch per NEC 600-6 8. Primary electrical feed 9. Transformers 10. 318" Sleeve anchors wl %" Aluminum spacers of letter cans (2) per latter Section 0 LED Channel Letter Front -Lit (Remote) Scale N.T.S. •�•n, a Chenc Chkk-Fil-A • 03102I2016 11 1RaM•ri s IJH m. re�m�M'n iro nrMra�wma s,. irc. n s �w i�.��..M - u� me�ro:� w Sv, m br 1 rv�s �e in�e �.m..eo. neie dlro Vmn b s .xw`. Site 0310N2016 0312018 Delaled D) a Da Revlaed M L atlon U bd Site Man JH JH Address: 145 79M Sbeel s445WesI: 03/17/t)I2016 n 1 Rerrlm•0 R3 AOdeO ] Da S' n JH Chanhassen MN 55317 Chanhassen FSU EM I 0 fi0"Chick-fFA InfNifual channel IettaB- Reu•rw lM Internally Ilumhulef LED 58.75 Top of Ngn to graft-1T-11" Bottom of aign W grade - 17-11" Thl. PI -IT b lb114 bE U DNDE RWRRERS IABOR/.TORWS. MC. ,t .nf U.. the..A b White LEDs (X) 60w Transformer Total Amps: X.XX (1) 20 amp 120V Circuit Req. This sign is to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code. 1) Grounded and bonded per NEC 600.7/NEC 250 2) Existing branch circuit in compliance with NEC 600.5, not to exceed 20 amps 3) Sign Is to be UL listed per NEC 600.3 4) UL disconnect switch per NEC 600.6- required per sign component before leaving manufacturer' 'For multiple signs, a disconnect is permitted but not required for each section 141 " m Sian Layout Detail Scale: 112" = 1'-0" 1. Existing Facade'. Brick 2. 0.065" Aluminum letter returns painted to match Red 3. 3/16" Clear lexan backs (interior of sign can painted ultra white for maximum illumination) 4. Red LEDs 5. 0.125" Aluminum faces painted to match Red 6. Disconnect switch UL Outdoor rated toggle type w/ neoprene boot per NEC 600-6 7. Primary electrcal feed In UL conduit / customer supplied UL junction box 8. Transformers within UL enclosure (removable lid) 9. 2' Sleeve spacers w/ 318" sleeve anchors 10. 0.75" x 0.0625" Aluminum angle pop -riveted to backs attached to returns via s8 Pan -head screws O Section Cat LED Channel Letter Reverse -lit (Remote) scale: N.T.S. e CPtnl: Chick-FI4A 03N2I2016 O 'rel ReMe- a JH q.. 11.1iv 1 1 wwR= "re.�• �'n"'^n Dui in ee 1 x'^�'mn M.�-"�.M�M�„,�,� a 103I2016 laf D7 B DB RMaef M Lonibn JH Sites: CF 03ro4n01 03/171204 U ief sne vbn UMMWD A3 ACtlef 3 Da a na H JH Adtlree#: Wesl 79M Street 445We0 Chanhassen MN 56317 Chanhassen FSU 60" Chitla6M Individual channel lallers Internally [Illuminated LED 56.75 MOMTap of sign to grads • 16'-0" aot0om o/ epn to grade 11'B' rnl. F. e es bley NNOEMYrIREPS LABO.eiORRB MC. �{, ens Beep rM1s M.rt' S' White LEDs (X) 60w Transformer Total Amps: X.XX (1) 20 amp 120V Circull Req. This sign is to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code. 1) Grounded and bonded per NEC 600.7MEC 250 2) Existing branch circuit in compliance with NEC 600.5, not to exceed 20 amps 3) Sign is to be UL listed per NEC 600.3 4) ILL disconnect switch per NEC 600.6- required per sign component before leaving manufacturer" 'For multiple signs, a disconnect is permitted but not required for each section 141 ' _Sign Layout Detail Scale 112'=t'-0" 1. Existing Facade'. Brick 2..040 Aluminum letter returns painted to match SW #6108'Latte' 3..125" x 1' trim cap to match red 4. 0.080' aluminum backs (interior of sign can painted white for maximum illumination) 5. Red LEDs 6. 3/16' Red Acrylic faces 7. Waterproof disconnect switch per NEC 600.6 8. Primary electrical feed 9. Transformers 10. 3/8" Sleeve anchors w/ W Aluminum spacers of letter cane (2) per letter Section OD LED Channel Letter Front -Lit (Remote) Scale N.T.S. Chick -MA Monument Sign Internally Illuminated wl fluorescent bulbs 55.46 38.96 SO FT 16.50 SO FT Read 55.46 Total 1 ewpnl4 u by urmeaewrrtas uwlrAroaex.lxc. Ill rza man 0 an 1711 IN P.M on W (5) F72T12CWH0 ( ) EESB1048-26L TOTAL AMPS= M. (5) F36T12CWH0 ( ) EESBID48-26L TOTAL AMPS= This sign Is to be Installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code. 1) Grounded and bonded per NEC 600.7/NEC 250 2) Existing branch circuit in compliance with NEC 600.5, not to exceed 20 amps 3) Sign is to be UL listed per NEC 600.3 4) UL disconnect switch per NEC 600.6- required per sign component before leaving manufacturer' 'For multiple signs, a disconnect is permitted but not required for each section �i Monument Sign Elevation Scale: 3/8' = V-0' BD Side View Scale 3/8" = P-0" • Chick -al -A Directlonel Signs Internally Illuminated wl fluorescent bulbs 2.65 rAI MCGuc11. u.M ey UNDERWWIEN84.lOMttMIEa, INC. V and Enn tM Meh: 121 OR Wall MaEj a P-?"W gig m7 (2) CW/641/HO/RDC (1) EBR828-120V-IS2 TOTAL AMPS = 1.20 This sign is to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code. 1) Grounded and bonded per NEC 600.7/NEC 250 2) Existing branch circuit in compliance with NEC 600.5, not to exceed 20 amps 3) Sign Is to he UL listed per NEC 600.3 4) UL disconnect switch per NEC 600.6- required per sign component before leaving manufacturer' 'For multiple signs, a disconnect is penniaed but not required for each section Fabricated Aluminum Sign Cabinet Internally61 1Internallyilluminated col T12/CWI HO fluorescent lamps/ ballast (@10' O.C.) Cabinet face and returns painted Spraylat Mark I (Satin White). `h enter Routed .080'x 1' aluminum pan face. Painted Matthews #N6425SP white. Backed wl #7328 white acMic and applied 3M 3630.53 Cardinal Red Translucent vinyl flan (1st Surface) - P fabricated aluminum mm all around perimeter. Painted Matthews MP T4155'Custom Black' Fabricated aluminum bass, skid painted Matthews MP 74155'Custom Black' r Grade Primary electrical TS 2 x 2x 1/4 TBD 3000 psi cencrete footing (calesan) FiVA D/F Directional Sign - 2.65 Sq Ft Option ICubbe3df easy Side View Qty t Scale: 314' = V.- Scale: 3/4' = l'-0' enter oppOSIM lids e1/ n� Client: Chick -FIFA • 03b2rz018 '.1 Rentlen s JH m,nm., i.tw rs..i,, sgnnin.. u. c.w wan .+.m.i.a p. mtl .a OY03rz016 D Wed 07 B Da R&Owl M L". JH Site #: CF-3840 U304rz016 O3I17rz016 u algid Site Plan I Ramwetl A3 Atlde42 Da ai na H JM Address: d45 Walt 79th Street Chanhassen. MN 55317 I Chanhassen FSU I rjjjjjjFChck-ffl-A Umsolonal Signs Internally Illuminated w/fluorescent Wide 2.65 0 TRY TO KEEP DIRECTIONALS 5-0' FROM CURBS WHEREVER POSSIBLE TO INSURE VEHICLES DON'T HIT THEM -Wv--is unW by u usocawarreas I..Z 111.tac. e.d ae.n rti s.m b- (2) F30T8/CW/841/HO/RDC (1 ) EBR828-120V-IS2 TOTALAMPS = 1.20 This sign is to be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code. 1) Grounded and bonded per NEC 600.7ski 260 2) Existing branch circuit in compliance with NEC 600.5, not to exceed 20 amps 3) Sign is to be UL listed per NEC 600.3 4) UL disconnect switch per NEC 600.6- required par sign component before leaving manufacturer' 'For multiple signs, a disconnect is permitted but not required for each section Fabricated Aluminum Sign Cabinet 84 1/A' 4 Intemally illuminated w/T72/CWI HO 1 ' fluorescent lamps/ ballast (@10' O.C.) Cabinet face and returns painted Spraylat Mark 1 (Satin White). �1 drive Routed .080'x 1' aluminum pan face. Painted thru Matthews #N6425SP white. Backed wl #7328 white acrylic and applied 3M 3630-53 Cardinal Red Translucent vnyl film(ist Surface) -- 1' fabh®ted aluminum trim all around perimeter. Painted Matthews MP 74155'Custom Black' Fabricated aluminum base skin painted Matthews MP 74155'Custom Black' Grade I Primary electrical L _ - TS2e2x14 TBD 31300 psi concrete tooting (caisson) TBD D/F Directional Sign - 2.Sq Ft %� Io i s1�ia aKp Side View Qty t S6cale: 3/4' = 1'-0' Scale: 3/4' = V-0' ISIZ drive thru Opposite Side e�•� Client. Chick-Fg-A 003302 6 nl ReMeri a H aT'ua pap„my. xw� "mev»a j) r a nee Site #. CF-3840 01201 13/20 0310aore leD7&D8RnNeed M Lorawn tlSits Plan H H Address: 445 West 79th Street JH Chanhassen MN 5M17 Chanhassen FSU Rupoort�nole Pole has 13- x 13' x 3/4" thick steel plate with four (4) 1"dia. Holes in each corner 2" from each end and four (4) anchor bolts Metalgrerfacea 0 Painted MATTE BUCK TEXTURED Graphic White high performance Vinyl film graphics IM] Teo 6'4P 9'-0- i BOTTOM TS 6 x 6 x 1/4 (A500 GRADE B) 8- FROM CENTER OF POLE TO BACK OF CURBING (4) 3/4- Lm30- J- BOLTS (A307) W/ HARDWARE (4- THREAD, 4- HOOK) R k"x10'x10'(A36) 01.0" GRADEATPOLEBASE #4 ® 12" O.C. VEFITICALLY (3" COVERAGE) (4) #4 012" O.C. EACH WAY (A615 GR 40) 3OD0 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING ® -I aranc - Bar Detail Qty 2 Scale: 3/8" = 1'-0" TBD Ride View Detail Scale: 3/8" = 1'-O' pedestrian crosswalk Posts are 2' x 2' x .125 square aluminum tubing capped on top M Painted Matthews MP 74155 "Custom Black' Panels are .080 aluminum with 3M #3290 Reflective White and 3M #3272 Reflective Red background and graphics. ■ to match PMS #186c Red 3M #3290 Reflective While YnuWlnn Panels are to be mounted w/ 3/8'0 thru bolls w/ washer and nut 932 Post/ Panel - Pedestrian Crosswalk Qty 5 Scale: 3/4' = 1'-0' R 1.00' Grade 3000 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING Panel Layout Detail Scale: 1 1 /2- = 1'-0' Bitro Lattice While LEDs LAT60-24S-W (6500K) (X) BOW Transformer TotalAmps: X.XX O (1) 20 amp 120V Circuit Req. This sign is to be Installed In accordance with the requirements of Article 600 of the National Electrical Code. 1) Grounded and bonded per NEC 600.7/NEC 250 2) Existing branch circuit in compliance with NEC 600.5, not to exceed 20 amps 3) Sign is to be UL listed per NEC 600.3 4) ILL disconnect switch per NEC 600.6- required per sign component before leaving manufacturer' 'For multiple signs, a disconnect Is permitted but not required for each section Rear Outer Lane Island - Plan View Scale: 3/8' = 1'-0' 6'-W 24- 123 Side View Detail ® Qty 2 Scale: 3/8' - 1'-0' CANOPY FRAMING. CLADDED WITH ALUMINUM PANELS PAINTED MATTE BUCK TEXTURED -- FABD ALUMINUM SOFFIT PANELS 2'.8 114' �- TS 2 x 6X 1/4'CABINET SUPPORTARM WELDED TO MAIN SUPPORT FABRICATED ALUMINUM DISPLAY CABINET W/ INTERNAL LED ILLUMINATION COMMUNICATIONS Ux CATIONS GRADE B) NOTE: OFFS ET TO ALLOW FOR COMMUMCATIONS EQUIPMENT _ ._... (4) 3/4' L-36' J- BOLTS (A307) W/ HARDWARE (4- THREAD, 4- HOOK) -t 3/4'x 14'x 14'(ASS) PRIMARY ELECTRICAL k4 ® 12- O.C. VERTICALLY (3- COVERAGE) (4) N4 ®12' O,C. EACH WAY (A615 OR 40) �'— 3000 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING 24' __� Drive Thru Canopy Scale: Detail 3/8' = 1'-0' �� Client: Chick -FIT -A 03/02YJ016 x rot RHan s JH n+. m.mmr Nero neo.+rerA.e.. µb"ro se ml..meom' a I• 1Ye tl, A Site e: CF-3840 03103Y4018 o3i0 t Deleted DT DB ReweaO M Loceton U Sea Ften JH Address: 445 West 791h Street 03/17M18 eted I Rx1aVeE A3 AE 2 DB SI ns Chanhassen. MN 55317 "`"d" nwm f "� m.�.." .nrem. mamn.i Chanhasai n FSU IIE2111 I""�'•- Posts are 2' a 2' z .125 square aluminum tubing capped on lop Painted Matthews #741550 'Dark Bronze' SIGN PANELS .080 aluminum with 3M #3290 Reflective White background and graphics. Reflex due (Verity) r 13M #3290 Reflective White MnuntlnG Panels are to be mounted w/ 318"0 thru bofls w/ washer and nut DOT Signage - HP (MN Specific) -- _ Oty 3 Scale: 1/2" = P-0' P WOl by 6.c. 3000 PSI concreM too" (Enlarged View) Scale: 1 10 = V-0" ��{^{,f C� Client: Chick-I'M 03MN2018 On bel Rennin s JH syI^TnmX°°p ln�> eM UKno q,rnry spn, u...m Mi=n u��yunWrW mp�.1 ma.+�p rain iNm a� 1 Site#: 03NL3016 Deblen D7 a De Reraea M lo[elgn a tea SXe Plan JH 445CF-3840 AddroSa: 145 West 791h Street Wes Chanhassen. MN 55317 0311112U16 031f 712016 RamoraC A3 AdCetl 3 D9 S nc JH Chanhassen FSU Posts are 2' z T z .125 square aluminum tubing capped on top M Painted Matthews MP 74155 Tustom Black' SIGN PANELS Panels are .DSO aluminum with 3M #3290 Reflective While and 3M #3272 Reflective Red background and graphics. ® to match PMS #195c Red I 13M #3290 Reflective White M.untinG Panels are to be mounted w/ 3/8'0 thm bolts wl washer and nut ® DOT Signage - Stop Sign -- Qty2 Scale: 1/2'=1'-0' TBD Panel Layout Detail Scab: 1' . 1'-0' Posts are 2" x 2' x .125 square aluminum tubing capped on top 0 Painted Matthews MP 74155'Custom Black' SIGN PANELS Panels are .080 aluminum with 3M #3290 Reflective White and 3M #3272 Reflective Red background and graphics. to match PMS #186c Red 3M #3290 Reflective White Panels are to be mounted wl 318'0 thm bolts w/ washer and nut DOT Signage - Do Not Enter/ Stop Qty 1 Scale: 1/2" = P-0' ;Mte TSD TBD F-JIM178I..1 Posts are 2" x 2' It .125 square aluminum tubing capped on top M Painted Matthews MP 74155 "Custom Black' ¢IGN PANELS Panels are .080 aluminum with 3M #3290 Reflective White and 3M #3272 Reflective Red background and graphics. to match PMS #186c Red 13M #3290 Reflective White Panels are to be mounted w/ 3/8'0 thru bolls w/ washer and nut DOT Signaoe - Do Not Enter _........ Qty t Scale: 1/2" = T-0" T80 SI CONCRETE G .� 0 . V//,j (L/ CClient: Chkk-FI4A o3ro}Y10t8 IR• JH m. rerw,ma�. an ymarrmarnM. spn. rrc. "; `�w ;a "inoz- u It m.a.,�rr. r � u w�a✓� o p•+r a....p rw ro be WnI�rIEeaW. re Mrem ernlMbO o1Netlwu np'P"°"X° °w"�"` Slte#: CF3840 03N313at8 Del&etl p8 RONW M Lxenon JH 03IMRm8 U ateE sne Ran H Address 446 West 79M $treat 03�1 ]/20i6 Ramoratl A:1 AOEeO Z p9 5 ne JH Chanhassen MN 55317 Chenhaeean FSU I'•"' Posts are 2' x 2' x .125 square aluminum tubing capped on top M Painted Matthews MP 74155'Custom Black' SIGN PANELS Panels are .080 aluminum wdh 3M #3290 Reflective White and 3M #3272 Reflective Red background and graphics. to match PIS #188c Red 3M #3290 Reflective White MraDfino Panels are to be mounted w/ 3/8'0 thru bolts wl washer and nut L: Post / Panel Sign- Curbside Delivery Qtyt Scale: 1/2'=1'-0" TBD it concrete Reserved for Curbside Delivery Panel Layout Detail Scale'. 1 1 /2" = T-0" �� -V Client. Chick-FI4A Blta#: CF3840 =2501e 0?g3/Mtfi Rate 03117 t8 roIR s Deletes D7 6 DB alWeea As Laeslion I uixMW SX Plen Renwvea A3 Ma 3DH Slar,% JH JH m.mmx,exir ym,X orMw nMmme. t x xr m. rw,p ur m 54n. he. w1,n pN/ r'Iq wwxn ux.orm asMb al..xc ror, rrra wr rxnn mrwr xr.,,waw nr larn. Address: 44S West 79th Shalt Chanhassen MN 55317 Chanhassen FSU Flag M Flag Pole HEIGHT A B C M. 3'4r 30' 2A' 25' 3b" 30' 24' 35' 4'-0' 35' 30• 40' 4W 42• M. 45' S'-0' 43" 42" 50' 6-6' 43' 42" Size Chart Ground sleeve and concrete installed by the general contractor Pole installed on pre -installed ground sleeve by sign contractor Gold anodized spun — aluminum Ball flush seam Cast aluminum truck revolving non -fouling type Swivel snaps 8 covers 2nd Hayed (Optional) Halyard (Rope) Halyard rover (Optiona0 Cleat rover box(Optional) 9'Casl aluminum m deaf � / 91Casl aluminum deaf (Optional) Aluminum flash collar 3000 PSI concrete so1x,kay ry, Hardwood wedges e (supplied by others) Fill space with 'r . packed dry sand .nti Foundation sleeve — hot dip galvanized steel Steel wintering wedges Steel base plate — Steelsuppod plate — welded to ground spike 9 4 Flag Pole Elevation ��/� �.A o-k 0� Client'. Chick-N-A Site k: CFJ840 03M 201 03I03IR016 0a10a1]016 1 Rmoor w owl D7 a 08 Revised M Ittwtlno uRgimea S4e Pbn JH JH JN rw niwvvq'uue pq"ry elti..mi - ^ ° ii' ^" •""'r'B 1°° °' rewwalea°inx,.a s'.0 ..� new�nb O1 a104 L, r Address' 445 West 79th Street Chanhassen MN 55317 03It]I3016 Removal A3 AdOetl 3 DB Sum. JN iY _avid«..... 'a'�" 119 mw ""'""°"' Chanhassen FSU I Door Vinyl Elevation Detail Double Door Scale: 1/2" = r-Y' 445 Door Vinyl Elevation Detail Single Door Scale: vz• = r-0" 171/2' L- 44 Std Transom Address Vinyl Qty 2 Sets Scale: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 1Y dining hours Monday - Saturday 6:30 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. Closed Sunday Free WiFi 1 ® Aw VISA oe4� Smoke Free Property • No Soliciting Window Dining Hours City 2 Sets Scale: 3" = 1'-0" 4,,, COMING SOON Home Of The Original Chicken Sandwich dilck-ifl a ri Banner Layout Detail swis: V = 1'-X tHESO,Minnesota Department of Transportation �B Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building F 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 April 7, 2016 Robert Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Chick-Fil-A MnDOT Review #S16-025 North Side of MN 5, West of Great Plains Blvd. Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1002 Dear Mr. Generous, The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the Chick-Fil-A site plan and has the following comments: Design The plans submitted to MnDOT are difficult to read. MnDOT right of way in greater detail. Please submit plans showing the proposed work on For questions concerning this comment, please contact Nancy Jacobson (651-234-7647) in MnDOT Metro District's Design Section. Water Resources: A drainage permit is required. The proposed development will need to maintain or reduce existing drainage rates to MnDOT right of way. The project developer will need to submit the most current construction plans and existing/proposed hydraulic computations for the 10 and 100 year rainfall events verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting MnDOT right of way will be perpetuated. The Drainage permit application can be found at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/utility/forms.html- Apolication for Drainage Permit A drainage permit checklist should be attached to this review letter which can be found at: http://ihub/metro/wre/Link%20Files/Drainage%2OPerTnit%2OApplications%2OChecklist.pdf The checklist provides more information about the requirements associated with the submittal of a MnDOT Drainage permit application. For questions regards these comments, contact Tahsina Alam, Metro Water Resources, at tahsina.alamna,state.mn.us or 651-234-7541 Right -of -Way: There is an existing Limited Use Permit (LUP) with the City of Chanhassen, LUP 1002-009, that is attached. The City of Chanhassen will need to work with Dan Phelps to modify this LUP to include the new sidewalk connection from Chick-fil-A. Dan Phelps can be reached at 651-234- 7585 or dan.phelps(dstate.mmus Permits: As previously stated, a drainage permit is required. Additionally, any use of or work within or affecting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. The proposed sign must be located entirely on the Chick-Fil-A property. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at ht://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/Maintenancg/pennits.html Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-234-7911) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be tamed around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf version of the plans. MnDOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews.dotng.state.mn.us provided that each separate e-mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: MaDOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disc. 4. Plans can also be submitted to MnDOT's External FTP Site. Please send files to: ftR://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/incominWMetroWatersEdge/Planning Internet Explorer doesn't work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234-7794. Sincerely, Tod Sherman Planning Supervisor Copy sent via E-Mail: Nancy Jacobson, Design Tahsina Alam, Water Resources David Sheen, Traffic Douglas Nelson, Right -of -Way Buck Craig, Permits Diane Langenbach, Area Engineer Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LIMITED USE PERMIT FOR NONMOTORIZED RECREATIONAL TRAIL C.S. 1002 County of Carver City of Chanhassen TH 5 Trail from CSAH 17 to Carver/Hennepin County Line In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 161.434 and 23 C.F.R. 652 also published as the Federal -Aid Policy Guide, a Limited Use Permit is hereby granted to the, City of Chanhassen, Permittee. This permit is for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and operating a nonmotorized recreational trail, (hereinafter called trail), within the right of way of Trunk Highway No. 5 as shown in red on Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This permit is executed by the Permittee pursuant to the attached resolution. In addition, the following special provisions shall apply: SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. The construction, maintenance, and supervision of the trail shall be at no expense to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2. Before construction of any kind, the plans for such construction shall be approved in writing by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, through the District Engineer. 3. No permanent structure(s) or advertising device(s) in any manner, form or size shall be constructed, placed or permitted to be constructed or placed upon the State of Minnesota right of way. 4. No commercial activity or activities shall be allowed to operate upon said State of Minnesota right of way. 5. Any and all maintenance of the trail shall be provided by the Permittee; this includes, but is not limited to, the plowing and removal of snow, and the installation and removal of regulatory signs. 6. This permit is non-exclusive and is granted subject to the rights of others, including, but not limited to public utilities which may occupy said right of way. Page 1 of 4 7. The Permittee shall preserve and protect all utilities located on the lands covered by this permit at no expense to the Minnesota Department of Transportation and it shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to call the Gopher State One Call System at 1-800-252-1166 at least 48 hours prior to performing any excavation. 8. Any crossings of the trail over the trunk highway shall be perpendicular to the centerline of the highway and shall provide and ensure reasonable and adequate stopping sight distance. The Permittee shall construct the trail at the location shown in the attached Exhibit "A" subject to verification by the Minnesota Department of Transportation District Engineer that the construction geometrics and procedures result in a trail that is compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the highway facility. 10. Approval from Minnesota Department of Transportation District Engineer shall be required for any changes from the approved plan. 11. Upon completion of the construction of the trail, the Permittee shall restore all disturbed slopes and ditches in such manner that drainage, erosion control and aesthetics are perpetuated. 12. This permit does not release the Permittee from any liability or obligation imposed by federal law, Minnesota Statutes, local ordinances, or other agency regulations relating thereto and any necessary permits relating thereto shall be applied for and obtained by the Permittee. 13. Any use permitted by this permit shall remain subordinate to the right of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to use the property for highway and transportation purposes. This permit does not grant any interest whatsoever in land, nor does it establish a permanent park, recreation area or wildlife or waterfowl refuge facility that would become subject to Section 4 (f) of the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1968, nor does this permit establish a Bikeway or Pedestrian way which would require replacement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 160.264. 14. This permit shall be subject to cancellation and termination by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, with or without cause, by giving the Permittee 90 days written notice of such intent. Upon said notice of cancellation the trail shall be removed within 90 days by the Permittee. Upon cancellation of said permit, or any portion thereof, the Permittee will be required to return and restore the area to a condition satisfactory to the Minnesota Department of Transportation District Engineer. The removal of the trail and the return and restoration of the area shall be at no cost to the Minnesota Department of Transportation and at the sole expense of the Permittee. Page 2 of 4 15. The Permittee, for itself, its successors, and assigns, agrees to abide by the provisions of Title VI Appendix C of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which provides in part that no person in the United States, shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from, or denied use of any trail. 16. The State of Minnesota, through its Commissioner of Transportation, shall retain the right to limit and/or restrict the parking of vehicles and assemblage of trail users on the highway right of way over which this permit is granted, so as to maintain the safety of both the motoring public and trail users. 17. No assignment of this permit is allowed. 18. The Permittee shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any container on the State's right of way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, the Permittee shall provide for cleanup of the spilled material and of materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of the Permittee. 19. The Permittee shall hold harmless and indemnify the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees and its successors and assigns, from liability claims for damages because of bodily injury, death, property damage, sickness, disease, or loss and expense arising from the operations of the trail or from the use of the portion of highway right of way over which this permit is granted. 20. The Permittee shall hold harmless and indemnify the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees and its successors and assigns from claims arising or resulting from the temporary or permanent termination of trail user rights on any portion of highway right of way over which this permit is granted. 21. The Permittee will hold harmless and indemnify the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees from claims resulting from temporary or permanent changes in drainage patterns resulting in flood damages. 22. The Permittee (for itself, its contractors, subcontractors, its materialmen, and all other persons acting for, through or under it or any of them), covenants that no laborers', mechanics', or materialmens' liens or other liens or claims of any kind whatsoever shall be filed or maintained by it or by any subcontractor, materialmen or other person or persons acting for, through or under it or any of them against the work and/or against said lands, for or on account of any work done or materials furnished by it or any of them under any agreement or any amendment or supplement thereto; agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the State of Minnesota from all such liens and claims. Page 3 of 4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: strict Engiinn/er Date_ �( r�� % APPROVED BY: COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION '� By: ��lCtr K�'' Director, Office of Land Management Date `'/ f c/(� / The Commissioner of Transportation by the execution of this permit certifies that this permit is necessary in the public interest and that the use intended is for public purposes. Page 4 of 4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Its And T �� Its w� f Date - CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 12, 2004 RESOLUTION NO: 2004-19 MOTION BY: Peterson SECONDED BY: Lundquist A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LIMITED USE PERMIT FOR NON -MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL TRAIL FROM CSAH 17 TO CARVER/HENNEPIN COUNTY LINE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the Limited Use Permit for Non -Motorized Recreation Trail, per attached document. This permit is for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and operating a non -motorized recreation trail from CSAH 17 to Carver/Hennepin County line as shown on Exhibit A. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 12' day of April 2004. ATTEST: L'ZA Todd Gerhardt, City Manager �� Furlong Ayotte Labatt Lundquist Peterson Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor NO None None SCAR IHO01 MAP_ V MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF .'TF CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR-D�c Eh pN€ Je INDEX LOCATED ON_ih-* FROU-296IMT—OF_C.R..17___' TO_MMJAM ILaWNiY11NE_IN CHANHASSEN mmy ROc.�w�M STATE PR0L NO.J�L(LIL51 - STATE PRO]. NO: [ i .I'll Les° MINN. PR01. X0.' ', MINN. PROI. N0, li ii :: I'll.l enplMe+°Xiil ". 1. rum. led[ d mewnm GROSS IENGIH 95e9 M RR_JSEO_MIIES GAOTS RNGTN J RfIMIIES.::::.. wnl 11m wrtv, unxwn eee.l. mns, lw mwudm, U BRIDGES-1[NGIH.�I3JL_NEI�WD_ MIRS ARIDGESAVWV MR MJMS melu+nwul PXDEPIIDNS-1EN4IH MDD m DIM MITES UCEPTINS-Me OIH - ERT=_MHES .. Ir .. ds 1110 H0 RNGTH %%X51212 RO-jLX.LMIRS -ND IENGTN I-' W—MIR2 : riiaixziri imm lµVAlln REF. POIM!SM0393_TD REF: P0INI� .MILE POIM yTO MITE FMNI_. n [ NOInwIwl Im nl a[ u I[ WWI PRO)E[T LENATH He" ON 1TeO"m E9 - •) + �Y REFEFENCE LINE ALIGNMENT I I..rwrn zil�rwM.ve .. Vµ[ MliuR REF. PoM 9S a 5Tn.991.67 REF. NNIN S STA, pei•1B _ _ Illm d wµi im n ml eirirviX 1411 T. ^ In IIM m11[nl l ' BEGIN MINN. PROD. N. •' j1-! ENO MINN PROD, NO M ....... e1+IllMM M1111[ {I p 11e11nne Ww111[[ u iXrule m� rut't"Yi- BEGIN S.P. IOOY51RNb) - END SP. 1002' 51(TH,S)' . ..�Yfl1l:uii rommmrz mr. - mu ., wi°v A. .. w i.. .. no in mat wrens . +11 nmmm rwnD ®.. � ii%niriioiwna`vds u I rsne eew[ n vinI ronm Iwr ,Y\A v lae run Iw nr i Nrtl s N s DN0..dLll_[NGR 1 [SION SWAG YP AnXMXbX. SWAM —"DESIGN , A '•— a I 9�9o�69NS RFAI0 Mry Apron •J y^. �O ` tt'JJII 9T9.02KJM'LT.I' 99e IB S9. 1]e IM4 p33•W.92• OSS EOB i RN a eN[or Apprdel MT9MIND 977•59.0T• 977951.44 RecommenkGld App [I -' - 19 '��...- xl 3 99413N.21 • 994-MM Y)33•xxBO•M11-47C9 Rwomeenkd Mf Appld_v��,.._T�_19N.. Rwemm nkeMApprdel_�xn�!llof/_ r. - ApprwM_?�9 INDEX .MAP f S.K.P. 10-617-13 "� ` � .' • CDMXTY 9T 19 APP OV B' enneen14VId Yllleee OXr\ Ymvu,Y[el le nlOXrerA\ nnLL M\Y[Y [ Y X snlrle\ + ; - f XmM.momw.uello.Y em +'�'I/I''+-'I.I.'.,.'r. Irleene '.. 1y. Rn p1[�uxu�' Wn A.. edYMIWMIRYrdI ' DESIOM DFSIOMAflON -TIER XO.L rnrt mprrnX r n ..r:m:w:w urme eXvn w AOT(CVrenl YaA19% � 't-0NO Oulp Speed 60 MPX.on roN nur[dnwlme[rMeau S[e ttadYUL MAIawL ..u:Pml:e enww:uixe.n u+nerl [en ADT(htbe Seer) 2010 — 25,0M 6esed'm AlwP1NO-Slght DHI nee "' ' ' STATE PROJ. N0. WARGE 9JERTJFNR w 'MY IOWA. W. Vol.) — 4100 Nelght el iy._1S� Height of ebleet 93_ I -C Prt0.6tt WGTIMJ 1002-51 RIC. N0. D (Dln<tlend D6tr) ._63_ S% Design Speed net eehb[ed et CARVER COINry --- DATE T(XmyCemmanMD <,9_% [n. Te en. Y x_ DISIRICI S.AP 10 GI7-13 S.. Te IT& nx_, .METRO � ." p. MD. 1002 51(T.H.S •121)' _SHEET NO.— I OF 230 SNEETS r II Y !1 A I 11 I pl LRGr M M] N R6 M W MT iI S, r.N. ]mN a a Eapaa Lx MNMxi p e tl IonreLn %a LI �° lal flpYWkl°Nm, Mai La Ifni .kl aa1 i»::.': i1W�,-TLVIR min ILw. iLWii i ax Maxe mav°�Nr -_ r xwx ax,k.xx x aRYMr IS p E Y 1° _ nxtw xv RIYNNN tN s rYw in�Y.°j'1° N o an; L1An NTIM; ]k N.N. l %aM Nn kWiM pLInY'A 110A°. ilnW NfnEn 41 rNpnNnr.- �==_ am ii 1 T r4Mf R x° -rnx°uiYuNe �Ii °inm um �I ��ua.eaa �aral., i L p °s w pia i.`.Y xi uia m�kr111.izl u N L M 1 iLei sNY kr IiTiN.an n un%uo amttNa vnN.TN NW fl%.fin RMr MNW 11/naf rNY rA iN nT kq xr 1 a �.c S' ° VA. v 1%a°w° I taA, q�Y °u�'n� "0" 10M1 mloxLa minlev:nw pEn ii: w ii n MA reNMP9- k�rMen' Rhos �J`x n iN xmwiY w. N Aan� Q. q IIy OR �BMLIN"A'Mpup. —B619 cVRU AND GUTTER AREP E! ylQlflgL ¢VBGHADE ¢ql. �' a�epeWTAMIIMTDN SEE 9PF.CIµ MWf MM MpCPORfJIIA ION[ 8'CONC6i9ENpK C90��faKKA BGN p10 /� I BdN ® P RP NLI'RIDW RY?ttMRNMaE P , 0. a® So E • URB ° nRrtR p°•SN'" P REFILEINE NNTt•NL6N9Lw9Ea Mnn A ME R1 iRCE PT�/pMLpIXER f T.S RMMH MMXNrt EWFP DD uxE i '• r' ® I0•WQIEPTPLAINLI BLVR• 03.9T.Ol ES REF. LINE CONTNCI PANE LOCATIONS Ui• 4 LINE- KNIL65 NB PREP LINE M.:I. W N EB REF. LINE E / O ' ® / 4 yA -+LI R ® 16t TB 9B PMA' ILEUNE- LISI.Oi90 WB RFF. LINE 0,11 �["EI•�E / W+' ! M' T ® ✓'... J. p.0-10.97 EATPLAINE ElV0. NAL IB.9T WB REF. LINE ,n CAD. O� 0 �BC00 •�N p1s �0g9B L06 00 i B'CQVC SIOEWAIN � uE E• ® ON•42+17 WE RREES, LINE BEN 2 �rC "Q ® ,� BG�t�0M B61B YE ® PEDESTRIAN CURB RMIP1 M OOT 5EQ PLATETOSAITOBELDrA AT CEIRER - LN�Ti 1U CLV84 TAU LLpp�� y BL p p OF RAISED ISLANDS WHERE S G . IO A4r" B9E4CBG G EP�FILE LWE°p ® ORX&V Y NhYN$& 9CE� IA •11 ENO NATC ANgV STATION. E0 0 !'A• P 1PER ___ AV LpmNG b ® SEE TYPICAf� SE¢}pf N6ET E RM DRIVEWAY MVEMENT SEC U. EV. ® B819C% Wff�+'" lid - ® TMXSIMN CUflB WIMN pJ'0.1TYP.1 1J 'E, Tk. A. / IN N0.R i ® RAISED 1 aAMS 9T lO BMSSWI Da 0.06 Ff /FT. TO AARO THE rLAN1. 2 B.TO ` HATCHING OS P, jr6p pEEAT PLAINS I FJi K •O'J 6 TPPp° <N�ON V#° 'vMA'� i 1 WTRANSTNf iNgA BOCRO TO BY2q pE• I fAr¢, OFNSINAD A 9HOM! ARE TO FACE p m yO Fl61 / GREATiLIM BLV SB PROFILEL}�E' T•b]OREAT RAW9 ANA O2gI1TEER TIER A'9xm TELL4NY"• - WIMP R iM tl mf 8•B9B IN -• TAPEPt WTCN Eot1�9T�TNT]g1N6V.AyAVD %-_q CFERFNCE LINE PTgB RI.P MATOILIN E S oE9zx Jw crrcLxED Dew suaE p:"N .YMwp ^"'^^•"^ Ox� Berton-A�Nchnan� Assoelett$. Inc. TRUNK HIGHWAY 0RECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION PLAN et-m.. M nruwx Or SINDAN .. we61IP-SIND. IOA2•a -OARA N230 Stets Pro] No. 1002-3I (LH.S) CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on April 7, 2016, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Site Plan Review with Variances to construct a 4,775 square -foot restaurant on 1.32 acres of property zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH) Case 2016-08 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Kim T. Meuwissen, Depu Jerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this Z day of T 12016. 'RY NN PaNR ,JE 'taryOtart' Public /aNoNFEPOk-Minnesota �:E)WNJn31,2020 MY Con'm Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Site Plan Review with Variances to construct a 4,775 square - Proposal: foot restaurant on 1.32 acres of property zoned Highway and Business Services District BH Applicant: Chick-fil-A Inc. Owner: Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. Property 445 West 791h Street Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens W public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.c!.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-08. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous Questions & by email at boenerous(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mmus/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions. Manned Unit oavetapments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Weiland Alleratoos, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Manning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any interestetl parry is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on Me subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Manning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommentlation. The item will be opened for the public be speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to Me City Council, The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommentlation. Rezonings, land use and cod. amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialAndusldal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity, may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperscolrepresenlative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal, Staff is also available to review, the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing. the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have screw ing to be Indutletl in the report, lease contact the Manning Staff person named on the noa(Icallm. Date & Time: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evenin , depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Site Plan Review with Variances to construct a 4,775 square - Proposal: foot restaurant on 1.32 acres of property zoned Highway and Business Services District BH Applicant: Chick-fil-A Inc. Owner: Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. Property 445 West 79th Street Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-08. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous Questions & by email at bgenerous(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions. Planned Unit Developments, Site Ran Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wall Members, Rezonings, Comprehensive Ran Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before Me Planning Commission. city ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of Me application In writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend Me meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Manning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal oversew of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments lake a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerclalflndustrial. • Minnesota Stale Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person walling to follow an item through the process should check will, the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for Me City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonumpresentative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested perspn(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be inducted In the report to the City Council. 0 you wish to have something to be Included in the report, lease contact the Manning Staff person named on the notification. 252750010 79TH STREET CENTER PARTNERSHIP LLP PO BOX 580 'CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0580 530 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2527700101 B 4 D LLC 555 3RD AVE NW _ HUTCHINSON, MN 55350-1673 500 79TH ST W _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 252770020 RAM PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 440 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9530 440 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 _ 252870010 BROWN PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 474 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0474 7901 GREAT PLAINS BLVD ICHANHASSEN, MN 55317 258900030 CHANHASSEN INN _ 531 W 79TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- i531 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 258900020 CHANHASSEN SHOPPES LLC 9478 RILEY LAKE RD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-3490 445 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 258560010 CHCR LLC PO BOX 1038 MASON CITY, IA 50402-1038 450 POND PROMENADE ICHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255900010 DRF CHANHASSEN MEDICAL BLDG 7101 78TH ST W #100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439-2527 300 LAKE DR E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 _ 258900010, HOLIDAY STATION STORES INC PO BOX 1224 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440.1224 441 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 257690010�KINSALE OF CHANHASSEN LLC _ PO BOX 404 CHANHASSEN, MIN 55317.0404 435 POND PROMENADE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2524900401 MICHAEL R PALUMBO 6200 OAK TREE BLVD STE 250 INDEPENDENCE, OH 44131-6943 590 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2516800211 NEW CHANHASSEN HOLDING COMPANY LLC PO BOX 100 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0100 '!0 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55327 250132000 NHH CHANHASSEN PARTNERS LLC 317 2ND AVE S STE 800 7455 FRANCE AVE STE 351 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2219 EDINA, MN 55435-4702 7405 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 320 LAKE DR E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 253460010 NHH LAKE DRIVE LLC 2SS560020 SILO BUILDING LLC 356144TH ST W MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55410-1359 420 POND PROMENADE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250133300 SORENSEN PROPERTIES LLC 12625 SSTH ST MAYER, MN 55360-9615 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344.2283 7900 GREAT PLAINS BLVD '500 MARKET ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 251680010 SOUTHWEST TRANSIT 13500 TECHNOLOGY DR , MN 55317 259990200 TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RAILROAD 2925 12TH 5T E GLENCOE, MN 55336-3368 , MN 252870020 VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL CHANGE PO BOX 14000 LEXINGTON, KY 40512-4000 335 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2586800401VILLAGES ON THE PONDS ASSN INC PO BOX 404 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.0404 , MN 252490020 VIRGINIA S THOMA_S FAMILY LP 6345 VIRGINIA DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-7701 550 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 258330030 VOP I LLC PO BOX 404 1 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.0404 1, MN Dynamex DYNAMEX 12837 Collections Center Drive Chicago, IL 60693-0128 2024123 1165362919 OW03/2016 k - 45.26 rrllhhlrlllrhulrlhllrupllrlggrpnrrllllrquluhlhul DYNAMEX ST PAUL CITY OF CHANHASSEN 6 651-644-6444 PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0147 Net 15 Days Please Return This Portion DYNAMEX 2024123 I 09/03/2016 I 45.26 I 1 of 1 (OF CHANHASSEN- CAMPBELL KNUTSON GRAND OAK OFFICE )MARKET BLVD CENTERI V ENTRANCE 860 BLUE GENTIAN RD MHASSEN, MN 55317 k290 ar: ANN OBEREMBT SAINT PAUL, MN 55121 ad: K BOOKLER PCs: 1 Wght 1 Pounds R1: ADMINISTRATION 101 — N /D - y 300 Total: Chic- f I -A P 4 mU-oK Land S�It 40.59 4.67 I nanK you for choosing uynamex. we nope you are sausnea with our services am we encourage you to share your Dynamex experience anytime at feedback@dvnamex.com For invoicing inquiries please call 1-800-930-3177 SC AN W-U 45.26 4526 * 3 S 5 * CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2016-08 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, April 19, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Site Plan Review with Variances to construct a 4,775 square -foot restaurant on 1.32 acres of property zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH) and located at 445 West 79th Street - Chick- fil-A. Applicant: Chick-fd-A Inc. Owner: Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen. mn.us/2016-08 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Bob Generous, AICP, Senior Planner Email: bgenerous@ ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, April 7, 2016: No. 4260) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. / (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.yC (' was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghgklmtopgrstu By: Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of 2016 v No Pbhc I AsaNmr�lae RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch t (, - 04? CITY OF CHANHASSEN P 0 BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 08/05/2016 11:20 AM Receipt No. 00322588 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Chick -Fill -A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta GA 30349- ------------------------------------------------------- Stormwater Connection Fee 39,994.68 Security Escrow 156,500.00 Total Cash Check 976945 Change 196,494.68 0.00 196,494.68 0.00 SCANNED HRGreen ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS CHICK-FIL-A, CHANHASSEN, MN Chick-fil-A-Chanhassen, MN PREPARED BY: HR Green, Inc. JOB NUMBER: 86160413 DATE: 06114/16 ITEM X DESCRIPTION UNITS UNIT COST QUANTITY c0 EROSION CONTROL 1 SILT FENCE LF $ 4.00 369 $ 1,476.00 2 INLET PROTECTION EA $ 300.00 7 $ 2,100.00 3 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA $ 3,500.00 1 $ 3,500.00 4 CONCRETE WASHOUT EA $ 1,000.00 1 $ 1,000.00 EROSION CONTROL TOTAL $ 8,076.00 LANDSCAPE & SITE RESTORATION 5 APPLE SERVICEBERRY EA $ 400.00 6 $ 2,400.00 6 PAPER BIRCH EA $ 450.00 3 $ 1,350.00 7 GINKGO EA $ 550.00 8 $ 4,400.00 8 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST EA $ 550.00 3 $ 1,650.00 9 CRIMSON SPIRE OAK EA $ 650.00 6 $ 3,900.00 10 DWARF BURNING BUSH EA $ 65.00 38 $ 2,470.00 11 INCREDIBALL HYDRANGEA EA $ 65,00 23 $ 1.495.00 12 FRAGRANT SUMAC EA $ 65.00 106 $ 6,890.00 13 SPIREA EA $ 65.00 54 $ 3,510.00 14 JUNIPER EA $ 65.00 53 $ 3,445.00 15 DWARF MOUNTAIN PINE EA $ 65.00 23 $ 1,495.00 16 TECHNITO ARBORVITAE EA $ 65.00 12 $ 780.00 17 LESSER CALAMINT EA $ 18.75 141 $ 2,643.75 18 DAYLILY EA $ 18.75 120 $ 2,250.00 19 DAYLILY EA $ 18.75 117 $ 2,193.75 20 HOSTA EA $ 18.75 47 $ 881.25 21 FOUNTAIN GRASS EA $ 22.50 58 $ 1.305.00 22 BLUE SWITCH GRASS EA $ 2250 55 $ 1,237.50 23 SOD SY $ 5.00 979 $ 4.895.00 24 MULCH CY $ 75.00 59 $ 4.425.00 25 ROCK CY $ 120.00 5 $ 600.00 LANDSCAPE 8 SITE RESTORATION TOTAL $ 54,216.25 TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS $ 62,292.25 Project AssumptionsMoteslComments HRG u nor a cons sand atn esumamr or mnsv,nvon mnmsmnr. ner should HRG'S rtnderwg an ophtion of rovCle mnm action msn he mmtidefed equiwknt m the mature add eaknt of mr.io, a connns,ion cox esdmam, or con ammon mnmarm, —.1d provide. HRGS opwon will he Mud mkly upon his or her oam eaperkme wim and rri eek. TNs requires HRG to make a dunda, of aswdr,hrms as m ..I mtditions that will he encountered on save: We specific decisions of other design prof -son -an engagd: the meads and methods of esmmusdon me mndamor will employ the cost add eaum of father. equipment and materials the mnmaaor sill employ marraaor's techniques in deverminu,g ,rives and market mndmons at We time. and other factors over which HRG has m mntroL Given d,e assa mpdom Mich as, be made. HRG eannot g raondee the aamrary of his or Mr opinions of cost and io remgnldon of rMt fact the CLIENT waives ars claim aperat HRG relauw m the amaoary of HRG'S opinion of prof abk mnsanuvon con GO Chick-fll-A-Chanhassen, MN PREPARED BY: HR Green, Inc. JOB NUMBER: 86160413 DATE: 07MD/16 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS CHICK.EIL-A, CHANHASSEN, MN ITEM6 DESCRIPTION UNITS UNITCOST QUANTITY COST STORM SEWER 1 4CIA. MANHOLE EA f 2.500.00 1 f 2,60000 2 5' DIA. MANHOLE CONNECT ONLINE OF EKIST. STORM SEWER EA 6 3,50000 1 f 3,5W.W 3 2'DIA. CATCH BASIN EA f 1,500.00 2 f 3,000.00 4 2.25' DIA. MnDOT CATCH BASIN EA f 2.000.W 3 f SOW 5 4'DIA. CATCH BASIN EA f 25W.00 2 f SODDW 6 IF WLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN EA f 1=00 1 f 1,WO.W 7 R4996C TRENCH DRAIN LF f 120-00 246 f 29.520W 8 17 RCP STORM SEWER LF f WOO 148 f 4,440.W 9 15- RCP STORM SEWER LF I f 35.00 1 f 2.695DO 10 17 CMP STORM SEWER LF f 3O.00 25 f 7WW 11 17 ADS W12 WT STORM SEWER LF f 35.W 78 f 2.73O.W 12 F PVC STORM SEWER LF f 2000. 3 f 60-00 13 WPVC STORM SEWER LF f 2500 254 f 6,350.W 14 10'PVC STORM SEWER LF f 3O.00 e6 f 2,5BO.W 15 12'CMP FES EA f 1O0OW 2 f 2WDW 16 1SRCP FES W/GRATE EA 6 1,50DO0 2 f 3,000.W 17 PVC CLEANOUT EA f 200.00 3 f 6WDD 18 TRENCH BACKFILL CY f 30.OD 171 f 5.130.00 19 STORMTRAP DETENTION SYSTEM LSUM 6 305,DO0.00 1 f 305.WO.W STORM SEWER TOTAL f 366,f66.001 EROSION CONTROL 20 SILT FENCE LF f 4 W W9 f 1!78.W 21 INLET PROTECTION EA f 30DW 4 S 1,2W.W 22 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA f 3,500.00 1 f 3,5W.0O 23 CONCRETE WASHOUT EA f 1,ODD 00 1 f 1.000.DO EROSION CONTROL TOTAL f 7,176.00 LANDSCAPE l SITE RESTORAMN 24 APPLE SERVICEBERRY EA f 400-00 6 f 2,40D W 25 IPAPER BIRCH EA f 450 DO 3 f 1,35DOD 26 GINKGO EA f 55O00 8 f 4.400.W 27 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST EA $ 550.00 3 f 1.650.00 28 CRIMSONSPIREOAK EA f 65().00 6 f 3,800.W 29 DWARF BURNING BUSH EA f SSW 38 3 2.470 W 30 INCREDIRALL HYDRANGEA EA f 6500 23 f 1,495.00 31 FRAGRANT SUMAC EA f 65.W 106 f 6.m0D 32 SPIREA EA f 65W 54 f 3,51000 33 JUNIPER EA f 6600 53 f 3A45.W m DWARF MOUNTAIN PINE EA f 6500 23 1 f 1,495.W 35 TECHNITO ARBORVITAE EA f 65.00 12 f 700.DO 36 ILESSER CALAMINT EA f 18.75 141 f 2,64375 37 JDAYLILY EA f 1875 12D f 2.250.00 38 DAYLILY EA f 18.75 117 f 2.1075 39 HOSTA EA f 18.75 47 f W125 40 FOUNTAIN GRASS EA f 2250 58 f 1,305.W 41 BLUE SWITCH GRASS EA f 2PSO 55 f 1237.50 42 SOD SY f 500 979 f 4,895.00 43 MULCH CY f 75W 59 f 4,425.W 44 ROCK CY f 120.00 5 f BW.W LANDSCAPE A SITE RESTORATION TOTAL f 64216.26 TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS f Project AssompBon"ohs/Commenb: FIXG 6 mr a morvueioo mr etimarm v ¢wawrwe movatm, n Itl 10t. ar protede meewraron wu h merLer<a pu:vknr b ae vOrt ei aYf l o.rrn. of F...nbo,: H.aa a.�mww, m.r.w n��ek.w �.�re: me.R�rK ea,��, mome, aa�ry r^or6:;m�ve.nF.Fm: me �... em memom a®wvn. e. o..m .:u �Wr m. am,sa mmr a bm,, rv:F�*r.m..r..l.w, m. oAv.n.., wi ®N,•r...,�rr.rwrr �eep.a m aere.�me P^� •^a..Fei mem:zr n meebc m w.r .tim xaG e..o.mr,a. ura ree..n.w�..es.wr ee..x. was �•--d rv.,m,.• m..�,.a �� e�. ar ¢e. orelwe nm.r..oe,e �F'.Nm.rm. as m<a4exr lr, r NIFiW!D r"'us ,GD CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 553 03/22/2016 12:11 PM Receipt No. 00311129 CLERK: AshleyM Development Cedar Rapids IA 52409-9009 79th Street Case 2016-08 ------------------------------------------------------- Variance 200.00 Sign Rent 200.00 Recording Fees 100.00 GIS List 63.00 Site Plan Review 550.00 Consolidate Lots 150.00 Overpayment -Refund 150.00 0.00 1,413.00 Change SCANNED HR GREEN DEVELOPMENT LLC 40523 Check Date: 3/15/2016 Invoice Number Date Voucher Amount Discounts Previous Pay Net Amount Development Review 3/11/2016 000000097974 1,413.00 1,413-00 Chanhassen, City Of TOTAL 101.40 Land Development 1 V12805 1 1,413.00 1.413.0 SCANNED Chick-fil-A - 446 West 79th St. - Planning Case 2016-08 $550.00 Site Plan Review $150.00 Consolidate Lots $200.00 Variance $200.00 Notification Sign $63.00 Property Owners List (21 addresses x $3 each) $100.00 Escrow for recording variance documents $1,263.00 TOTAL $1,413.00 Check 40523 From HR Green Development LLC -$150.00 BALANCE TO BE REFUNDED SCANNE_ col/-o8 aG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 0 22 /I APPLICATION /� TiION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date: D jK ! PC Date: _ Y �' 1 I Ili CC Date: 1 1,0 60.Day Review Date: j71 (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑� Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative.................................................. $100 0 Commercial/Industrial Districts*......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: 4( ,775 thousand square feet) Include number of exi i employees: Include number of new employees: 45 ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( units) ❑� Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots.......................$600 + $15 per lot l lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 ❑� Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ......................................... $150 ❑ Final Plat ........ .................................................. $700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ❑� Notification Sign (City to install and remove)...................................................................................................................... $200 ❑� Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( 21 addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit 0 Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements (_ easements) TOTAL FEE: $1,413.00 Description of Proposal: Demolition of the existing commerical building & parking lot and construction of a 4,775 SF Chick-fil-A restaurant, parking lot, underground detention system, & associated utilities. Property Address or Location: 25900020 Parcel #. 25:900021 Legal Description: 445 W. 79th Street 'See Attached' Total Acreage: 1.32 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No Present Zoning: Highway and Business Services District Requested Zoning: Highway and Business Services District (E Present Land Use Designation: Commercial Requested Land Use Designation: Commercial Existing Use of Property: Commercial Retail ❑� Check box is separate narrative is attached. PropertySection 3: . Applicant APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. 1 agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. 1 further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Contact: JasofiHlll Address: 5200 Buffington Road Phone: (404)684-8530 City/State/Zip: Atlanta, GA 30349 Cell: Email: jason.h11@cf corp.com Fax: Signature: Date: 3/15/16 PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, ' authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. 1 will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC Contact: Jay Scott Address: 9478 Riley Lake Road Phone: (651) 336-6060 City/State/Zip: Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Cell: Email: JayScott@solomonre.com Fax: Signature: Date: This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: HR Green, Inc. Contact: Joe Vavrina Address: 420 N. Front Street, Suite 100 Phone: (815) 385-1778 City/State/Zip: McHenry, IL 60050 Cell: Email: jvavrina@hrgreen.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Whb should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑� Applicant Via: ❑� Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑� Engineer Via: ❑� Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing (required). SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM Property Card Parcel ID Number 258900021 Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name CHANHASSEN CITY C/O CITY FINANCE DIRECTOR Mailing Address CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0147 Property Address Address City Building Information Building Style Above cede Bedrooms Finished S Ft Year Built Garage N Bathrooms Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0112 1 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF I N I N I N Assessor Information 11 Estimated Market Value 2014 Values (Payable 2015) 2015 Values (Payable 2016) Last Sale Land $206,300.00 $206,300.00 Date of Sale Building $0.00 $0.00 Sale Value Total $206,300.00 $206,300.00 Cs aara prov detl herewim rs for reference purposes only Tha dale is rot suitable Iw legal. engmeenngsurveying or other similar purposes. Carver County does not guaremee the accuracy of the -,krmation contained herein. This data is fuMshed on an as is basis and Carver County makes no representations or warranties. e0her expressed or Impliedfor the memhanlebildy or fitness of the nformation provided for any purpose. This disclaimer is provided pursuant to Mindesota Statutes W6 03 and the user of the data provided herein acknowledges that Carver Courtly shall not be liable for any damages and by using this data n any way expressly waives all claims and agrees to defend indemnify. and hold harmless Carver County, ifs uficialsoEicers. agents. employeesetc from any antl all claims brought by anyone who uses sd,�31 ��RRffpp'r'(� eln, its employees or agents. or CARVER third parties which arise out of users access. By acceptance of this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide ahZ��td+Ao another party unless the near includes COUNIT with the data a copy of this disclaimer. Tuesday, March 22, 2016 Carver County, MN Property Card Parcel ID Number 258900020 Taxpayer Information: { i Taxpayer Name CHANHASSEN SHOPPES LLC * s — Mailing Address 9478 RILEY LAKE RD e \ tAi EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-3490 r Ilk I A\ k Property Address �� +! „ T Address 445 79TH ST W �. City CHANHASSEN, MIN 55317 0 Parcel Information Uses Commercial GISAcres 1.06 Net Acres 1.06 Deeded Acres Plat ZAMORADDITION Lot 002 Block 001 Tax Description Building Information Building Style Above rade Finished S Ft Bedrooms Year Built Garage N Bathrooms Miscellaneous Information School District 0112 Watershed District 1 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF Homestead N Green Acres N Ag Preserve N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2014 Values (Payable 2015) 2015 Values (Payable 2016) Last Sale Land $579,000.00 $579,000.00 Date of Sale 02/04/2015 Building $707,700.00 $707,700.00 Sale Value $1,200,000.00 Total $1,286,700.00 $1,286,700.00 Tne Gaza ocvoon hersrnb is for reference purposes only. This data Is rot suitable for legal ergmeanngsurveying a other s:mdar purposes Carver County does not gusfarrtee the accuracy of the Monmatioo contanetl herein. This tlafa is furnished on im as is bans and Carver County makes no representations or warranlws either expressetl or implied for the merchantability or fitness of the nformalmb puns ded for any purpose. This disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §4 03 and the user of the data provded heren acknowledges that Carver County shall not be liable for any damages. and by using this data in any way expre'I a c ran' i to employdefendees or agents end fwltl harmless Carver County. ns oPouals. officers. agents. employees. etc. from any and all ctalme brought by anyone who uses Nei a n. As employees a agents. or CARVER Nvtl parties which arise out of users access. By acceptance: of this data. the user agrees not to lraumil this data or pros de access b Il a any pa another party unless the user includes COUNTY with the data a copy of this disclaimer. Tuesday, March 22, 2016 Carver County. MN HRGreen Storm Water Management Report Latest Revision: March 17'', 2016 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Prepared for: Chick-f I -A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta: Georgia 30349-2998 Phone. 404-684-8530 ,i'•; OFCHAturIA$�Eti Mr. Jason Hill FECd�ED HRG Job: 86150413 2016 Prepared by: gPtH°SSEi.PLP�'WIN%3 Prepared by: Erik Hertel Reviewed by: Todd Richards, P.E. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOT,A. i►'/ Ill DATE TODD M. RICHARDS LIC.NO. 62503 INDEX Design Notes Tab 1 • Existing Conditions • Proposed Conditions • Erosion Control Drainage Calculations Tab 2 • Rational Method "C" Calculation • HydroCAD Calculations (Existing Conditions) • HydroCAD Calculations (Proposed Conditions) • Stormwater Infiltration Calculations • Stormwater Quality Calculations • Hydraflow Plan View • Hydraflow IDF Curve • Hydraflow DOT Tabulation • Hydraflow Profiles • Inlet Capacities • Weir Overflow Calculations Exhibits Tab 3 • Existing Conditions Exhibit (EX-1) • Proposed Drainage Areas Exhibit-2 (EX-2) • Grading Plan (C-3.0) • Erosion Control Plan (C-3.1) References Tab 4 • RPBCWD Atlas 14 Rainfall Data • MPCA Stormwater Manual Design Infiltration Rates • MN DOT Drainage Manual Table 3.11 (RCN Values) Tab 1 Design Notes Design Notes Background Chick-fil-A (CFA) is proposing the construction of a 4,775 square foot free-standing restaurant with associated parking lot and utilities located at Lot 2 of the Zamor Addition in the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. This project is located at 445 West 79t' Street, or more generally on the northwest corner of the intersection of State Trunk Highway No. 5 and Great Plains Boulevard. This drainage report was prepared in accordance with the stormwater requirements stated in Chapter 19 of the City of Chanhassen's City Code, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Rules, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Stormwater Manual. Existing Conditions The subject CFA lease parcel is currently two separate lots. The western parcel is currently a developed lot with an existing building and associated parking lot, and the eastern parcel is a vacant lot. As part of this project, the two lots will be consolidated and the proposed parcel will be approximately 1.32 acres in size. In the existing condition, the impervious and pervious areas within the overall parcel are calculated to be 37,874 square feet and 19,714 square feet respectively, resulting in the site to be 65% impervious. Based on the impervious and pervious coefficients of 0.95 and 0.35, the proposed weighted runoff coefficient for the parcel in the existing condition is calculated to be 0.74. The site slopes generally from northeast to southwest. The existing bituminous parking lot has been designed with a range of two to four percent slopes. Runoff generated by the parking lot is directed around the building towards the west property line via sheet flow. Stormwater runoff sheet flows to a low point gutter outlet at this property line which conveys the runoff from the existing development and the western neighboring development south towards an existing 15-inch flared end section at an elevation of 945.76. This outlet pipe is then tributary to the storm sewer within the Minnesota DOT right-of-way where it is directed south across STH No. 5. The eastern half of the subject property is an undeveloped grassed area that slopes from north to south at approximate 10 percent slopes. This area drains to an existing vegetated swale located along the south property line. This shallow swale flows west at approximate one to two percent slopes to the same 15-inch flared end section as stated previously. All on -site stormwater, in the site's existing condition, is tributary to the DOT storm sewer system. Exhibit EX-1 details the site's existing pervious areas, slopes, and drainage patterns. Per the geotechnical report, prepared by Giles Engineering Associates, the underlying soils present on -site are mainly comprised of sandy and silty clays. As such, the existing soils have been assumed to have a classification of Hydrologic Soil Group D. The MPCA Stormwater Manual states that Group D soils have an infiltration rate of 0.06 inches per hour. Per Table 3.11 of the Minnesota DOT Drainage Manual, all impervious and pervious areas have been assigned an RCN value of 98 and 80 respectively. The site's existing runoff rates for the 2-year, 10-year, 100-year, and 100-year 10-day snowmelt events were calculated to be 4.14 cfs, 6.61 cfs, 12.28 cfs, and 1.61 cfs respectively. Proposed Conditions The proposed improvements to the site consist of the construction of a free-standing Chick-fil-A restaurant, reconstruction of the existing parking lot, installation of an on -site storm sewer system, underground detention system, and the installation of other associated utilities. In the proposed condition, the impervious and pervious areas within the parcel are calculated to be 44,628 square feet and 12,960 square feet respectively, resulting in the site to be 77% impervious. The proposed improvements will create an additional 6,754 square feet of impervious surface. The parcel's proposed impervious/pervious areas are delineated on Exhibit EX-2. Based on impervious and pervious coefficients of 0.95 and 0.35, the proposed weighted runoff coefficient for the parcel in the complete buildout condition is calculated to be 0.81. The Chick-fil-A site will be required to meet the stormwater requirements set forth by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and the City of Chanhassen. These requirements include limiting the peak stormwater runoff to that of the existing conditions, stormwater abstraction, and treatment of stormwater to remove total phosphorus and total suspended solids. Stormwater Abstraction ' The Rules of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Codes states that the proposed Chick-fil-A development will need to provide for the abstraction of 1.1 inches of runoff from all impervious surfaces within the parcel. This results in the site having to abstract a total of 4,091 cubic feet of stormwater. Per discussions with the City and the Watershed, this site will be required to infiltrate the entire volume and providing an underdrain within the StormTech system will not be acceptable. As such, the required abstraction volume will be stored within the open graded aggregate below the bottom of ' the chambers of the StormTech system and surrounding the system. The abstraction volume water level was calculated to be 945.87 based on the volume calculation included in this report. To detain the required volume, the invert of the outlet weir has ' been set at this elevation. Since the existing underlying soils are mostly made up of clays and have a maximum infiltration rate of 0.06 inches per hour, the foot print of the open graded aggregate layer under the StormTech chambers had to be expanded ' throughout the parking lot. The total required foot print to infiltrate 4,091 cubic feet of stormwater within 48 hours was calculated to be approximately 17,100 square feet. All abstraction and infiltration calculations have been included in this report. ' Peak Runoff Rates & Stormwater Detention The Rules of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and Chanhassen City Codes states the proposed development must limit peak runoff rates to of the existing conditions for the 2-year, 10-year, 100-year, and 100-year 10-day snowmelt event for all points where stormwater discharge leaves the site. Atlas 14 rainfall data was utilized in all calculations as found on the Watershed's Permits and Rules website. The existing runoff rates were modeled using HydroCAD v10.0 utilizing a Type II Distribution as required by the Chanhassen City Code. The table below notes the calculated existing runoff rates for each storm event. 1 Peak Release Rates(Existing Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 100-Year, I O-Day Snowmelt 4.14 cfs 6.61 cfs 12.28 cfs 1.61 cfs In order to control the proposed release rates to be at or below the existing, the site has been designed to utilize an underground stormwater detention system and a restrictor structure. It has been calculated that the Chick-fil-A site will need to provide for 7,154 cubic feet of storage. A StormTech underground detention facility will be utilized to achieve the required stormwater detention volume. A total of 130 SC-310 chambers, including the surrounding open graded aggregate, will provide 7,279 cubic feet of storage. There will be an 8-inch open graded aggregate layer below the bottom of the StormTech chambers and outside of the footprint of the chambers. The open graded aggregate will surround the chambers and be placed at a depth of 6-inches over the top of the chambers. The open graded aggregate is identified as having a 35 percent void spacing. The StormTech and open graded aggregate volume calculations are included in this report. The 100-year high water level within the system was calculated to be 947.52. The StormTech system will outlet to a precast restrictor structure located just south of the system. In order to meet the maximum release rates stated previously, the structure has been designed with a rectangular weir. The weir has been designed with a 1.75 foot width that will be set at an invert elevation of 945.87. The top of the weir has been set at the top of detention system elevation of 947.63 in order to maximize the storage volume. HydroCAD was utilized to calculate the proposed peak release rates which can be seen in the table below. Peak Release Rates (Proposed Condition 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year 100-Year, I O-Day Snowmelt 2.54 cfs 6.08 cfs I 12.13 cfs 1.56 cfs As can be seen from the table, all the proposed peak rates are less than the existing thus meeting the requirements. All HydroCAD calculations have been included in this report. Any runoff generated by events greater than the 100-year storm will overtop the five foot wide weir wall. The additional flow that can be conveyed over the weir is 4.4 cfs for a total of 12.57 cfs. In an emergency situation (weir blocked) the stormwater will begin to flow out of structures ST-19 and ST-22. All tributary stormwater generated by the site will be routed to Nyloplast structures and then to the header pipes of the StormTech system. The lateral pipes coming from the header pipe will connect to the StormTech chambers at an elevated invert to force the low flow events through the isolator rows within the StormTech system. These isolator rows will utilize a geotextile to prevent the migration of debris and sediment into the aggregate layer. Stormwater Quali ■ The Chick-fil-A development will have to meet certain water quality requirements as required by the Watershed District Rules. Their rules state that each site must provide for at least sixty percent annual removal efficiency for total phosphorus and at least ninety percent annual removal efficiency for total suspended solids from the stormwater runoff. The proposed development will be utilizing a StormTech system with isolator rows, open graded aggregate layer below the chamber system and throughout portions of the parking lot, catch basins with sumps, and a vegetated swale. WinSLAMM v10.1.6 was utilized to calculate the annual removal efficiencies for suspended solids and total phosphorus from all on -site captured runoff. It was calculated that the proposed controls will remove 87.01 percent total phosphorus and 89.76 percent total suspended solids. The WinSLAMM output summaries have been included in this report. Storm Sewer Stormwater runoff generated by the individual drainage areas within the CFA site will be ' collected into the site's proposed storm sewer system. This system will route the runoff to the StormTech system. The CFA storm sewer system was designed to accommodate the 100-year storm event using Hydraflow Storm Sewers for AutoCAD Civil3D, 2013. The Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed Atlas 14 rainfall data for the 100-year event ' was utilized. On -site drainage areas were defined for each individual storm sewer catch basin. These drainage areas can be seen in Exhibit EX-2 and are also noted in the Rational "C" Calculation table included in this report. The times of concentration used in calculation for each drainage area were assumed to be 5 minutes due to short on -site flow paths. The total stormwater flow generated by the CFA development (DA-1 thru DA- 11) for the 100-year event, in the full buildout condition, was calculated to be 10.57 cfs ' which will be directed to the StormTech system. The Hydraflow model was also utilized to calculate the HGL of the storm sewers, verifying that the HGL is below the rim elevations of the storm structures. The Hydraflow model and inlet capacity calculations have been included in this report. Stormwater flows generated by rain events greater ' than the 100-year event will be directed overland towards the southwest and to STH No. 5. The proposed condition overland flow routes are delineated as bold arrows on Exhibit EX-2. ' A proposed restrictor structure located at the outlet of the StormTech system will control the release to the 21-inch downstream pipe. The 21-inch pipe will outlet to a shallow depressional area. The outlet pipe has been sized accordingly in order to convey the 100-year event out of the StormTech system. The depressional area will outlet to a proposed 15-inch RCP which will connect online of the existing Minnesota DOT storm sewer. The existing 15-inch flared end section, as noted in the Existing Condition section, was not able to be utilized due to grading and cover constraints throughout the site. Stormwater runoff generated by the area east of the drive-thru lane (DA-12) will flow to the southwest to an improved vegetated swale. The existing swale will be re -graded and a new 12-inch culvert will be introduced underneath the proposed sidewalk connection. ' All flow generated by this area will be tributary to the proposed 15-inch flared end section as noted previously. Should the 15-inch outlet pipe reach capacity during the emergency storm event, stormwater would overflow to the west, matching the existing drainage patterns. t Erosion Control Installation of sediment and erosion control measures will be placed prior to the start of construction. Silt filter fences and inlet protection baskets are planned to control erosion and silt displacement until vegetation is established. The Erosion Control Plan for this ' project has been included in the engineering plan set (Sheet C-3.1). Tab 2 Drainage Calculations HRGreen RATIONAL METHOD"C" CALCULATION (PROPOSED) Project # 86150413 Project, CHICKFILA By ECH Date 211W2016 Location, CHANHASSEN, MN Checked Date Revised ECH Dale 31IW2016 BASIN NO. AREA (SO -FT) AREA PAVED AREA GRASS %PAVED 0.95 %GRASS 0.35 RUNOFF "C" AREA (acres) CIA, LEASE PARCEL EIUSTING CONDITION 57,588 37.874 19,714 65% 34% 0.74 1.32 PROPOSED CONDITION 57,588 44,628 12,960 77% 23% 0.81 1.32 DRAINAGE AREAS JONSITE STORM SEWER DA-1"CULVERT) 27 2,460 67 97% 3% 0.93 0.06 DA-219 5,175 1" 97% 3% 0.93 0.12 DA6023 9.516 507 95% 5% 0.92 0.23 DAd417 8.328 2,089 80% 20% 0.0 0.24 DA572 1,654 718 70% 30% 0.77 0.05 DA696 2,904 3,082 49% 51% 0." 0.14 DA-718 2,818 0 100% 0% 0.96 0.06 DA625 1,225 0 ll % 0% 0.95 0.03 DA681 1,181 0 100% 0% 0.95 0.03 DA-1074 1,174 0 ll % 0% 0.96 0.03 DA-1152 1,152 0 100% 0% 0.96 0.03 DRAINAGDA-1286 73 7,113 1 1% 99% 0.06 0.16 ' ASSTRACTKIN RPBCW Rules (Section 3.2e) Pmposed Nev, and/or RecambWed 44 628 SF I mPervious Surface (CFA Sile)'. ' ACs(raclion of 1,1" imm impervious Sudaces 4,091 CF OM1504131Design`vCalc%SR=MI50413_calc-RabonalC Asz Page 1 of 1 1 FA Parcel (Imp( Outfall 2 CFA Parcel (Pervious) Sub4 Reach Aon Link Exisitng Conditions 86150413 existing-conditions_HydroCAD Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HvdroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.869 98 Impervious (1) 0.453 80 Pervious (2) 1.322 92 TOTAL AREA Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type // 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD010.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Time span=0.08-48.00 hrs, dt=0.08 hrs, 600 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff Area=37,874 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.64" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=3.29 cfs 0.191 of Subcatchment2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff Area=19,714 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.15" Tc=5.0 min CN=80 Runoff=0.87 cfs 0.043 of Pond OUT: Outfall Inflow=4.14 cfs 0.235 of Primary=4.14 cfs 0.235 of Total Runoff Area = 1.322 ac Runoff Volume = 0.235 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.13" 34.23% Pervious = 0.453 ac 65.77% Impervious = 0.869 ac ' Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type // 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 _ Summary for Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff 3.29 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.191 af, Depth= 2.64" t Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" ' Area (sfl CN Description 37,874 98 Impervious 37,874 98 100.00% Impervious Area ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) 3.29 cfs Time (hours) Type 11 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=37,874 sf Runoff Volume=0.191 of Runoff Depth=2.64" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 ® Runofr Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type 1l 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff = 0.87 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.043 af, Depth= 1.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 19,714 80 Pervious 19,714 80 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Hydrograph 0.95 � _ - - _ 0.87 cfs ■Runoff 0.9 0.85 Type II 24-hr 075 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" °7 - Runoff Area=19,714 sf 0.6 " _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - Runoff Volume=0.043 of _ 6.65 os Runoff Depth=1.15" ° 045 LL Tc=5.0 min 0.4- 0.36 CN=80 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 ---- __.� -. _. ..------- 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Time (hours) Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type lI 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD@ 10.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Pond OUT: Outfall Inflow Area = 1.322 ac, 65.77% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.13" for 2-yr event Inflow = 4.14 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.235 of Primary = 4.14 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.235 at, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Pond OUT: Outfall Hydrograph ■ Inflow ■ Primary Time (hours) Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 7 Time span=0.08-48.00 hrs, dt=0.08 hrs, 600 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff Area=37,874 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.03" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=4.94 cfs 0.292 of Subcatchment2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff Area=19,714 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.27" Tc=5.0 min CN=80 Runoff=1.68 cfs 0.085 of Pond OUT: Outfall Inflow=6.61 cfs 0.378 of Primary=6.61 cfs 0.378 of Total Runoff Area = 1.322 ac Runoff Volume = 0.378 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.43" 34.23% Pervious = 0.453 ac 65.77% Impervious = 0.869 ac ' Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type1124-hr 10-yrRainfall=4.27" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. I Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 01358 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 ' Summary for Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff - 4.94 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.292 af, Depth= 4.03" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27' ' Area (sf) CN Description 37,874 98 Impervious 37,874 98 100.00% Impervious Area ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, ' Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Hydrograph ' cfs 4.94 ■Runoff 6 Type II 24-hr ' 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=37,874 sf Runoff Volume=0.292 of 3 Runoff Depth=4.03" t LL Tc=5.0 min 2 CN=98 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 Time (hours) Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type // 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 ' - Summary for Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff 1.68 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.085 af, Depth= 2.27" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" ' Area (so CN Description 19,714 80 Pervious 19,714 80 100.00% Pervious Area ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) UUM (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Hydrograph ' 1� ■Runoff ' Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=19,714 sf ' Runoff Volume=0.085 of Runoff Depth=2.27" ' LL Tc=5.0 min CN=80 0 2 4 fi 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 Time (hours) 1 Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type/1 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HVdroCAD@ 10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Pond OUT: Outfall Inflow Area = 1.322 ac, 65.77% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.43" for 10-yr event Inflow = 6.61 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.378 of Primary = 6.61 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.378 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Pond OUT: Outfall ■ Inflow ■ Pnmary Time (hours) Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type1124-hr 100-yrRainfall=7.41" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Time span=0.08-48.00 hrs, dt=0.08 hrs, 600 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchmentl: CFA Parcel (impervious) Runoff Area=37,874 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=7.17" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=8.62 cfs 0.520 of Subcatchment2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff Area=19,714 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.07" Tc=5.0 min CN=80 Runoff=3.66 cfs 0.191 of Pond OUT: Outfall Inflow=12.28 cfs 0.711 of Primary=12.28 cfs 0.711 of Total Runoff Area = 1.322 ac Runoff Volume = 0.711 of Average Runoff Depth = 6.45" 34.23% Pervious = 0.453 ac 65.77% Impervious = 0.869 ac Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type1124-hr 100-yrRainfall=7.41" ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD@ 10.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 ' Summary for Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff 8.62 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.520 af, Depth= 7.17" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=7.41" ' Area (sf) CN Description 37,874 98 Impervious 37,874 98 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Hydrograph 'fl ■Runoff 9 8.6�fss 6 Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=37,874 sf Runoff Volume=0.520 of Runoff Depth=7.17rr Tc=5.0 min CN=98 4 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 Time (hours) Exisitng Conditions 86160413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Typel124-hr 100-yrRainfall=7.41" t Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydrOCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 13 ' - Summary for Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff - 3.66 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.191 at, Depth= 5.07" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=7.41" ' Area (sf) CN Description 19,714 80 Pervious 19,714 80 100.00% Pervious Area ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, ' Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Hydrograph ' 4 3.66 cfs m Runoe ' Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=7.41" 3- Runoff Area=19,714 sf Runoff Volume=0.191 of Runoff Depth=5.07" ' 2- Tc=5.0 min CN=80 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 Time (hours) Exisitng Conditions 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroCAD Type1124-hr 100-yrRainfall=7.41" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Pond OUT: Outfall Inflow Area = 1.322 ac, 65.77% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.45" for 100-yr event Inflow = 12.28 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.711 of Primary = 12.28 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.711 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Pond OUT: Outfall Hydrograph ■ Inflow ® Primary Time (hours) Existing Conditions (Snow Melt) 86150413_existing-conditions _HydroC Type 1124-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchmentl: CFA Parcel (impervious) Runoff Area=37,874 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.96" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.06 cfs 0.504 of Subcatchment2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff Area=19,714 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98 Runoff=0.55 cfs 0.262 of Pond OUT: Outfall Inflow=1.61 cfs 0.767 of Primary=1.61 cfs 0.767 of Total Runoff Area = 1.322 ac Runoff Volume = 0.767 of Average Runoff Depth = 6.96" 34.23% Pervious = 0.453 ac 65.77% Impervious = 0.869 ac ' Existing Conditions (Snow Melt) 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroC Type 1124-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD@ 10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 ' Summary for Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff - 1.06 cfs @ 119.06 hrs, Volume= 0.504 af, Depth> 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 ' Area (so CN Description 37,874 98 Impervious 37,874 100.00% Impervious Area ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Hydrograph ■ RunoH 1.06 cfs Type II 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Runoff Area=37,874 sf I I ■ Runoff Volume=0.504 of I Runoff Depth>6.96" Tc=5.0 min I I I ■ CN=98 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) ' Existing Conditions (Snow Melt) 86150413_existing-conditions_HydroC Type 11 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD010.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff - 0.55 cfs @ 119.06 hrs, Volume= 0.262 af, Depth> 6.96" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (sf) CN Adl Description 19,714 80 98 Pervious 19,714 Weighted Average 19.714 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, 0.6 0.55 0.5 045 04 m 0.35 ' 3 0.3 0 LL 025 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Hydrograph 0.55 cfs Time (hours) Type II 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Runoff Area=19,714 sf Runoff Volume=0.262 of Runoff Depth>6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98 210 220 230 240 8 Runoff Existing Conditions (Snow Melt) 86150413_existing-conditions _HydroC Type 1124-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HvdrOCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4 Summary for Pond OUT: Outfall Inflow Area = 1.322 ac, 65.77% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 6.96" for 100 event Inflow = 1.61 cfs @ 119.06 hrs, Volume= 0.767 of Primary = 1.61 cfs @ 119.06 hrs, Volume= 0.767 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Pond OUT: Outfall Hydrograph ■ Inflow ■ Pnmary Time (hours) 1 CFA Parcel (Impervious) P StormTech 2 CFA Parcel (Pervious) Subcat Reach on Link FH outing Diagram for 86150413 proposed -conditions HydroCAD Prepared by HR Green, Inc., Printed 3/17/2016 droCAD®10.00-15 sin 01358 ® 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed -co nditions_HydroCAD Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 1.025 98 Impervious (1) 0.298 80 Pervious (2) 1.322 94 TOTAL AREA Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type 1124-hr 2-yrRainfall=2.87" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Time span=0.08-48.00 hrs, dt=0.08 hrs, 600 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchmentl: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff Area=44,628 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.64" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=3.88 cfs 0.225 of Subcatchment2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff Area=12,960 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.15" Tc=5.0 min CN=80 Runoff=0.58 cfs 0.029 of Pond P: StormTech Peak Elev=946.45' Storage=5,519 cf Inflow=4.43 cfs 0.254 of Outflow=2.54 cfs 0.160 of Total Runoff Area = 1.322 ac Runoff Volume = 0.254 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.30" 22.50% Pervious = 0.298 ac 77.50% Impervious = 1.025 ac ' Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type ll24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.8 7" ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 ' Summary for Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff - 3.88 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.225 af, Depth= 2.64" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sfl CN Description 44,628 98 Impervious 44,628 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ff) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, ' Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) 4 3.88 cfs Hydrograph ' ■Runoff ' Type II 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" 3 Runoff Area=44,628 sf ' Runoff Volume=0.225 of Runoff Depth=2.64" 2 Tc=5.0 min CN=98 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 Time (hours) Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type // 24-hr 2-yrRainfall=2.87" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff = 0.58 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af, Depth= 1.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 12,960 80 Pervious 12,960 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Hydrograph 0.55 Type II 24-hr 0.5 - - _ - 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" OA5 Runoff Area=12,960 sf °4J 1 ■ Runoff Volume=0.029 of 035 I Runoff Depth=1.15" ° 03I'll Tc=5.0 min 0,2511 M CN=80 0.1 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 Time (hours) ® RunoH Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type/1 24-hr 2-yrRainfall=2.87" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Pond P: StormTech Inflow Area = 1.322 ac, 77.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.30" for 2-yr event Inflow = 4.43 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.254 of Outflow = 2.54 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.160 af, Atten= 43%, Lag= 6.9 min Primary = 2.54 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.160 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Peak Elev= 946.45' @ 12.06 hrs Surf.Area= 16,663 sf Storage= 5,519 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 218.0 min calculated for 0.160 of (63% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 110.1 min ( 874.3 - 764.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 945.13' 2,222 cf 34.83'W x 95.001 x 2.50'H Field A 8,273 cf Overall - 1,926 cf Embedded = 6,347 cf x 35.0% Voids #2A 945.80' 1,926 cf ADS_StormTech SC-310 x 130 Inside #1 Effective Size= 28.9"W x 16.0"H => 2.07 sf x 7.121 = 14.7 cf Overall Size= 34.0"W x 16.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 2.07 sf x 10 rows #3 945.13' 3,132 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below 7,279 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Voids Inc -Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (°/a) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.13 13,354 0.0 0 0 945.80 13,354 35.0 3,132 3,132 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 945.87' Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 1.76 Width (feet) 1.75 1.75 nmary OutFlow Max=2.44 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=946.44' (Free Discharge) 1=Custom Weir/Orifice (Weir Controls 2.44 cfs @ 2.46 fps) Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type // 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HVdrOCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Pond P: StormTech - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS_StormTechSC-310 (ADS StormTech®SC-310) Effective Size= 28.9"W x 16.0"H => 2.07 sf x 7.121 = 14.7 cf Overall Size= 34.0"W x 16.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 2.07 sf x 10 rows 34.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing = 40.0" C-C Row Spacing 13 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.44' Row Adjustment = 93.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 95.00' Base Length 10 Rows x 34.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing x 9 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 34.83' Base Width 8.0" Base + 16.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 2.50' Field Height 130 Chambers x 14.7 cf +0.44' Row Adjustment x 2.07 sf x 10 Rows = 1,925.6 cf Chamber Storage 8,272.9 cf Field - 1,925.6 cf Chambers = 6,347.4 cf Stone x 35.0% Voids = 2,221.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 4,147.1 cf = 0.095 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 50.1 % 130 Chambers 306.4 cy Field 235.1 cy Stone ' Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type 1124-hr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Pond P: StormTech Hydrograph ■ Inflow ® Primary Time (hours) Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type1124-hr 10-yrRainfall=4.27" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydrOCADO 10.00-15 s/n 01358 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Time span=0.08-48.00 hrs, dt=0.08 hrs, 600 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchmentl: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff Area=44,628 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.03" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=5.82 cfs 0.344 of Subcatchment2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff Area=12,960 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.27" Tc=5.0 min CN=80 Runoff=1.10 cfs 0.056 of Pond P: StormTech Peak Elev=946.91' Storage=6,411 cf Inflow=6.92 cfs 0.401 of OutFlow=6.08 cfs 0.307 of Total Runoff Area = 1.322 ac Runoff Volume = 0.401 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.64" 22.50% Pervious = 0.298 ac 77.50% Impervious = 1.025 ac IProposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD@ 10.00-15 s/n 01358 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 ' - Summary for Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff - 5.82 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.344 at, Depth= 4.03" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27' Area (so CN Description 44,628 98 Impervious 44,628 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, ' Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Hydrograph ' ■Runoff 6 5.82 cfs Type II 24-hr 5 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=44,628 sf 4 Runoff Volume=0.344 of Runoff Depth=4.03" ' LL 3 Tc=5.0 min CN=98 2 ] I 0 �� 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 ' Time (hours) Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type1124-hr 10-yrRainfall=4.27 Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/1712016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 - Summary for Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff - 1.10 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.056 at, Depth= 2.27" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Area (sfl CN Description 12,960 80 Pervious 12,960 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Hydrograph ■ Runoff 1.10 cfs Type II 24-hr ' 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=12,960 sf Runoff Volume=0.056 of Runoff Depth=2.27rr 0 LL Tc=5.0 min CN=80 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 Time (hours) Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-con ditions_HydroCAD Type 1l 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HVdroCADO 10.00-15 s/n 01358 © 2015 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Pond P: StormTech Inflow Area = 1.322 ac, 77.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.64" for 10-yr event Inflow = 6.92 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.401 of Outflow = 6.08 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.307 af, Atten= 12%, Lag= 3.5 min Primary = 6.08 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.307 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Peak Elev= 946.91' @ 12.00 hrs Surf.Area= 16,663 sf Storage= 6,411 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 170.2 min calculated for 0.306 of (76% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 82.9 min ( 839.7 - 756.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 945.13' 2,222 cf 34.83'W x 95.00'L x 2.50'H Field A 8,273 cf Overall - 1,926 cf Embedded = 6,347 cf x 35.0% Voids #2A 945.80' 1,926 cf ADS StormTech SC-310 x 130 Inside #1 Effective Size= 28.9"W x 16.0"H => 2.07 sf x 7.121 = 14.7 cf Overall Size= 34.0"W x 16.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 2.07 sf x 10 rows #3 945.13' 3,132 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below 7,279 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Voids Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) M (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.13 13,354 0.0 0 0 945.80 13,354 35.0 3,132 3,132 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 945.87' Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 1.76 Width (feet) 1.75 1.75 Primary OutFlow Max=6.03 cfs @ 12.00 hrs HW=946.90' (Free Discharge) t1=Custom Weir/Orifice (Weir Controls 6.03 cfs @ 3.33 fps) IProposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type 1124-hr 10-yrRainfall=4.27" ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 i ydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HYdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 ' Pond P: StormTech - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS_StormTechSC-310 (ADS StormTech(DSC-310) Effective Size= 28.9"W x 16.0"H => 2.07 sf x 7.12'L = 14.7 cf ' Overall Size= 34.0"W x 16.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 2.07 sf x 10 rows 34.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing = 40.0" C-C Row Spacing 13 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.44' Row Adjustment = 93.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = ' 95.00' Base Length 10 Rows x 34.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing x 9 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 34.83' Base Width 8.0" Base + 16,.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 2.50' Field Height ' 130 Chambers x 14.7 cf +0.44' Row Adjustment x 2.07 sf x 10 Rows = 1,925.6 cf Chamber Storage 8,272.9 cf Field - 1,925.6 cf Chambers = 6,347A cf Stone x 35.0% Voids = 2,221.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 4,147.1 cf = 0.095 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 50.1 % 130 Chambers 306.4 cy Field 235.1 cy Stone Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type // 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Pond P: StormTech Hydrograph ■ Inflow ■ Pnmary Time (hours) Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type 1124-hr 100-yr Rainfall= 7.41 " Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD010.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Time span=0.08-48.00 hrs, dt=0.08 hrs, 600 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchmentl: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff Area=44,628 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=7.17" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=10.16 cfs 0.612 of Subcatchment2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff Area=12,960 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.07" Tc=5.0 min CN=80 Runoff=2.41 cfs 0.126 of Pond P: StormTech Peak Elev=947.52' Storage=7,153 cf Inflow=12.56 cfs 0.738 of Outflow=12.13 cfs 0.644 of Total Runoff Area = 1.322 ac Runoff Volume = 0.738 of Average Runoff Depth = 6.70" 22.50% Pervious = 0.298 ac 77.50% Impervious = 1.025 ac Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-con ditions_HydroCAD Type1124-hr 100-yrRainfall=7.41" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 0 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 ' - Summary for Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff 10.16 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.612 af, Depth= 7.17" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=7.41" ' Area (sf) CN Description 44,628 98 Impervious 44,628 100.00% Impervious Area ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Hydrograph i 10.16 cts ®Runoff 10. Type II 24-hr t 9 100-yr Rainfall=7.41rr 6 Runoff Area=44,628 sf ' 7 Runoff Volume=0.612 of 6 Runoff Depth=7.17rr 0 6 Tc=5.0 min 4 CN=98 2 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hours) Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type 1124-hr 100-yrRainfall=7.41" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD010.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Runoff = Summary for Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) 2.41 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.126 af, Depth= 5.07" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description 12,960 80 Pervious 12,960 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Hydrograph 2.41 cfs Type II 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=12,960 sf Runoff Volume=0.126 of Runoff Depth=5.07rr Tc=5.0 min CN=80 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hours) ■ Runoff Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type 1124-hr 100-yrRainfall=7.41" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydrOCADO 10.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Summary for Pond P: StormTech Inflow Area = 1.322 ac, 77.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.70" for 100-yr event Inflow = 12.56 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.738 of Outflow = 12.13 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.644 at, Atten= 3%, Lag= 2.2 min Primary = 12.13 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.644 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.08-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.08 hrs Peak Elev= 947.52' @ 11.98 hrs Surf.Area= 16,663 sf Storage= 7,153 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 125.1 min calculated for 0.643 of (87% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 63.6 min ( 811.7 - 748.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 945.13' 2,222 cf 34.83'W x 95.001 x 2.50'H Field A 8,273 cf Overall - 1,926 cf Embedded = 6,347 cf x 35.0% Voids #2A 945.80' 1,926 cf ADS_StormTech SC-310 x 130 Inside #1 Effective Size= 28.9"W x 16.0"H => 2.07 sf x 7.121 = 14.7 cf Overall Size= 34.0"W x 16.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 2.07 sf x 10 rows #3 945.13' 3,132 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below 7,279 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Voids Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) M (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.13 13,354 0.0 0 0 945.80 13,354 35.0 3,132 3,132 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 945.87' Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 1.76 Width (feet) 1.75 1.75 rimary OutFlow Max=11.52 cfs @ 11.98 hrs HW=947.46' (Free Discharge) 1=Custom Weir/Orifice (Weir Controls 11.52 cfs @ 4.13 fps) ' Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type 1124-hr 100-yrRainfall=7.41" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-15 s/n 01358 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 ' Pond P: StormTech - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS_StormTechSC-310 (ADS StormTechOSC-310) Effective Size= 28.9"W x 16.0"H => 2.07 sf x 7.121 = 14.7 cf Overall Size= 34.0"W x 16.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 2.07 sf x 10 rows 34.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing = 40.0" C-C Row Spacing 13 Chambers/Row x 7.12' long +0.44' Row Adjustment = 93.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = ' 95.00' Base Length 10 Rows x 34.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing x 9 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 34.83' Base Width 8.0" Base + 16.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 2.50' Field Height ' 130 Chambers x 14.7 cf +0.44' Row Adjustment x 2.07 sf x 10 Rows = 1,925.6 cf Chamber Storage 8,272.9 cf Field - 1,925.6 cf Chambers = 6,347.4 cf Stone x 35.0% Voids = 2,221.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 4,147.1 cf = 0.095 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 50.1 % ' 130 Chambers 306.4 cy Field ' 235.1 cy Stone 1 1 ' Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-con ditions_HydroCAD Type ll24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=7.41 " ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Pond P: StormTech Hydrograph ■ Inflow IN Pnmary Time (hours( Proposed Conditions 86150413_proposed-conditions_HydroCAD Type1124-hr 100-yrRainfall=7.41" Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD810.00-15 s/n 01358 ©2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Elevation Storage (feet) (cubic -feet) 945.13 0 945.15 117 945.17 233 945.19 350 945.21 467 945.23 583 945.25 700 945.27 816 945.29 933 945.31 1,050 945.33 1,166 945.35 1,283 945.37 1,400 945.39 1,516 945.41 1,633 945.43 1,750 945.45 1,866 945.47 1,983 945.49 2,100 945.51 2,216 945.53 2,333 945.55 2,449 945.57 2,566 945.59 2,683 945.61 2,799 945.63 2,916 945.65 3,033 945.67 3,149 945.69 3,266 945.71 3,383 945.73 3,499 945.75 3,616 945.77 3,733 945.79 3,849 945.81 3,939 945.83 3,991 945.85 4,043 945.87 4,095 945.89 4,147 945.91 4,199 945.93 4,251 945.95 4,302 945.97 4,354 945.99 4,405 946.01 4,456 946.03 4,507 946.05 4,557 946.07 4,608 946.09 4,658 946.11 4,708 946.13 4,758 946.15 4,807 Stage -Area -Storage for Pond P: StormTech Elevation Storage (feet) (cubic -feet) 946.17 4,857 946.19 4,906 946.21 4,954 946.23 5,003 946.25 5,051 946.27 5,099 946.29 5,146 946.31 5,194 946.33 5,241 946.35 5,287 946.37 5,334 946.39 5,380 946.41 5,425 946.43 5,471 946.45 5,516 946.47 5,561 946.49 5,605 946.51 5,649 946.53 5,693 946.55 5,736 946.57 5,778 946.59 5,820 946.61 5,862 946.63 5,903 946.65 5,944 946.67 5,984 946.69 6,024 946.71 6,063 946.73 6,102 946.75 6,140 946.77 6,177 946.79 6,213 946.81 6,249 946.83 6,284 946.85 6,317 946.87 6,350 946.89 6,381 946.91 6,412 946.93 6,441 946.95 6,470 946.97 6,497 946.99 6,524 947.01 6,551 947.03 6,577 947.05 6,602 947.07 6,627 947.09 6,652 947.11 6,676 947.13 6,700 947.15 6,723 947.17 6,746 947.19 6,769 Elevation Storage (feet) (cubic -feet) 947.21 6,792 947.23 6,815 947.25 6,839 947.27 6,862 947.29 6,885 947.31 6,908 947.33 6,931 947.35 6,954 947.37 6,978 947.39 7,001 947.41 7,024 947.43 7,047 947.45 7,070 947.47 7,093 947.49 7,117 947.51 7,140 947.53 7,163 947.55 7,186 947.57 7,209 947.59 7,232 947.61 7,255 947.63 7,279 Proposed Conditions (Snow Melt) 86150413_proposed -conditions_Hydro Type/1 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-15 s/n 01358 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchmentl: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff Area=44,628 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.96" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.25 cfs 0.594 of Subcatchmentl: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Runoff Area=12,960 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98 Runoff=0.36 cfs 0.173 of Pond P: StormTech Peak Elev=946.29' Storage=5,147 cf Inflow=1.61 cfs 0.767 of Outflow=1.56 cfs 0.672 of Total Runoff Area = 1.322 ac Runoff Volume = 0.767 of Average Runoff Depth = 6.96" 22.50% Pervious = 0.298 ac 77.50% Impervious = 1.025 ac ' Proposed Conditions (Snow Melt) 86150413_proposed-conditions_Hydro Type 11 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 ' Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 © 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Summary for Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Runoff - 1.25 cfs @ 119.06 hrs, Volume= 0.594 af, Depth> 6.96" ' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 ' Area (sf) CN Description 44,628 98 Impervious 44,628 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1: CFA Parcel (Impervious) Hydrograph ■Runoff 1.25 cfs ' Type II 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20" 1 AMC=4 ' Runoff Area=44,628 sf Runoff Volume=0.594 of ' Runoff Depth>6.96" Tc=5.0 min ' CN=98 o 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) Proposed Conditions (Snow Melt) 86150413_proposed -conditions_Hydro Type/1 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Runoff = Summary for Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) 0.36 cfs @ 119.06 hrs, Volume= 0.173 af, Depth> 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (sf) CN Adl Description 12,960 80 98 Pervious 12,960 Weighted Average 12,960 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2: CFA Parcel (Pervious) Hydrograph ■ Runoff 0.38 0.36 cfs 0.36 Type II 24-hr 240.00 hrs 0.34 0.32 100 Rainfall=7.20" 03 0.28 AMC=4 0.26 Runoff Area=12,960 sf ^. 0.24 022 - Runoff Volume=0.173 of 3 0.2 0.18 Runoff Depth>6.96" 0.16014 - '... Tc=5.0 min 0'2 - - - - - - - AMC Adjusted CN=98 01 ---- 0.08 " 0.06-- 0.04 - 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) Proposed Conditions (Snow Melt) 86150413_proposed-conditions_Hydro Type/1 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCADO 10.00-15 s/n 01358 @ 2015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 25 Summary for Pond P: StormTech Inflow Area = 1.322 ac, 77.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 6.96" for 100 event Inflow = 1.61 cfs @ 119.06 hrs, Volume= 0.767 of Outflow = 1.56 cfs @ 119.12 hrs, Volume= 0.672 at, Atten= 3%, Lag= 3.4 min Primary = 1.56 cfs @ 119.12 hrs, Volume= 0.672 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 946.29' @ 119.12 hrs Surf.Area= 16,663 sf Storage= 5,147 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 1,156.7 min calculated for 0.672 of (88% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 542.3 min ( 7,874.4 - 7,332.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 945.13' 2,222 cf 34.83'W x 95.001 x 2.50'H Field A 8,273 cf Overall - 1,926 cf Embedded = 6,347 cf x 35.0% Voids #2A 945.80' 1,926 cf ADS_StormTech SC-310 x 130 Inside #1 Effective Size= 28.9"W x 16.0"H => 2.07 sf x 7.12'L = 14.7 cf Overall Size= 34.0"W x 16.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 2.07 sf x 10 rows #3 945.13' 3,132 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below 7,279 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Voids Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (%) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.13 13,354 0.0 0 0 945.80 13,354 35.0 3,132 3,132 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 945.87' Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 1.76 Width (feet) 1.75 1.75 Primary OutFlow Max=1.56 cfs @ 119.12 hrs HW=946.29' (Free Discharge) t1=Custom Weir/Orifice (Weir Controls 1.56 cfs @ 2.12 fps) Proposed Conditions (Snow Melt) 86150413_proposed-con ditions_Hydro Type H 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HydroCAD®10.00-15 s/n 01358 02015 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Pond P: StormTech - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS_StormTechSC-310 (ADS StormTech®SC-310) Effective Size= 28.9"W x 16.0"H => 2.07 sf x 7.12'L = 14.7 cf Overall Size= 34.0"W x 16.0"H x 7.561 with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 2.07 sf x 10 rows 34.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing = 40.0" C-C Row Spacing 13 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.44' Row Adjustment = 93.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 95.00' Base Length 10 Rows x 34.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing x 9 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 34.83' Base Width 8.0" Base + 16.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover = 2.50' Field Height 130 Chambers x 14.7 cf +0.44' Row Adjustment x 2.07 sf x 10 Rows = 1,925.6 cf Chamber Storage 8,272.9 cf Field - 1,925.6 cf Chambers = 6,347.4 cf Stone x 35.0% Voids = 2,221.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 4,147.1 cf = 0.095 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 50.1 % 130 Chambers 306.4 cy Field 235.1 cy Stone Proposed Conditions (Snow Melt) 86150413_proposed -co nditions_Hydro Type/1 24-hr 240.00 hrs 100 Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by HR Green, Inc. Printed 3/17/2016 HvdroCAD® 10.00-15 s/n 01358 © 2015 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 27 Pond P: StormTech ■ Inflow 1.61 cfs ■ Primary i6 cfs Inflow Area=1.322 ac Peak Elev=946.29' Storage=5,147 cf 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) HRGreen Stormwater Infiltration Calculations Chick-fil-A, Chanhassen, MN Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Rules: • Abstraction of 1.1 inches of stormwater runoff from all onsite impervious areas. Total Proposed Impervious Area: 44,628 sf Abstraction Volume Required: 4,091 cf Infiltration Rate of Native Soils (Hydrologic Soil Group D): 0.06 in/hr (Per MPCA Stormwater Manual) Maximum Allowable Draw Down Time: 48 hours Required Infiltration Rate: (4,091 cf1 = 85, 23 cf/hr 48 hr fi r0.061T ft l rxsfl _ 85.23 cf \ hr 12 in/ \ 1 / hr x=17,046sf — 17,100sf In order to infiltrate the required abstraction volume of 4,091 square feet within 48 hours with a soil infiltration rate of 0.06 inches per hour, an infiltration bed size of approximately 17,100 square feet will be required. HRGreen.com Phone 815.385.1778 Fax 815.385.1781 Toll Free 800.728.7805 420 North Front Street, Suite 100, McHenry, Illinois 60050 WinSLAMM Plan View nA . DA-12 SLAMM for Windows Version 10.1.6 (c) Copyright Robert Pitt and John Voorhees 2012 All Rights Reserved Data file name: 0:\86150413\Design\Calc\Storm\WinnSLAMM\WinSLAMM_031516.mdb Data file description: Rain file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\Rain Files\MN Minneapolis AP 4899.RAN Particulate Solids Concentration file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\v10.1 WI_AVGOI.pscx Runoff Coefficient file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_SL06 Dec06.rsvx Residential Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI Res and Other Urban Dec06.std Institutional Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_Com Inst Indust Dec06.std Commercial Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_Com Inst Indust Dec06.std Industrial Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_Com Inst Indust Dec06.std Other Urban Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_Res and Other Urban Dec06.std Freeway Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\Freeway Dec06.std Pollutant Relative Concentration file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI GEO03.ppdx Start of Winter Season: 12/02 End of Winter Season: 03/12 Model Run Start Date: 08/03/48 Model Run End Date: 12/19/99 Date of run: 03-17-2016 Time of run: 06:48:02 Total Area Modeled (acres): 1.180 Years in Model Run: 51.41 Runoff Percent Particulate Particulate Percent Volume Runoff Solids Solids Particulate (cu ft) Volume Conc. Yield Solids Reduction (mg/L) (Ibs) Reduction Total of all Land Uses without Controls: 2.93E+06 - 120.7 22044 - Outfall Total with Controls: 309203 89.43% 110.7 2137 90.31% Annualized Total After Outfall Controls: 6014 41.56 Concentration - Concentration - Pollutant Yield -No Pollutant Yield - Pol. Yield Percent No Controls With Controls Conc. Units Controls With Controls Units Reduction Pollutant Particulate Solids 120.7 110.7 mg/L 22044 2137 Ibs 90.31% Total Solids 171.7 166.3 mg/L 31343 3210 Ibs 89.76% SLAMM for Windows Version 10.1.6 (c) Copyright Robert Pitt and John Voorhees 2012 All Rights Reserved Data file name: 0:\86150413\Design\Calc\Storm\WinnSLAMM\WinSLAMM_031516.mdb Data file description: Rain file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\Rain Files\MN Minneapolis AP 4899.RAN Particulate Solids Concentration file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\v10.1 WI AVG01.pscx Runoff Coefficient file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI SL06 Dec06.rsvx Residential Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_Res and Other Urban Dec06.std Institutional Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_Com Inst Indust Dec06.std Commercial Street Delivery file name: C:\WInSLAMM Files\WI_Com Inst Indust Dec06.std Industrial Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_Com Inst Indust Dec06.std Other Urban Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_Res and Other Urban Dec06.std Freeway Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\Freeway Dec06.std Pollutant Relative Concentration file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_GE003.ppdx Start of Winter Season: 12/02 End of Winter Season: 03/12 Model Run Start Date: 08/03/48 Model Run End Date: 12/19/99 Date of run: 03-16-2016 rime of run: 16:18:30 Total Area Modeled (acres): 1.180 Years in Model Run: 51.41 Total of all Land Uses without Controls: Outfall Total with Controls: Annualized Total After Outfall Controls: Pollutant Particulate Solids Total Phosphorus Concentration - No Controls 120.7 0.2639 Runoff Percent Particulate Particulate Percent Volume Runoff Solids Solids Particulate (cu ft) Volume Conc. Yield Solids Reduction (mg/L) (Ibs) Reduction 2.93E+06 - 120.7 22044 - 309203 89.43% 110.7 2137 90.31% 6014 41.56 Concentration - Pollutant Yield - Pollutant Yield - Pol. Yield Percent With Controls Conc. Units No Controls With Controls Units Reduction 110.7 mg/L 22044 2137 Ibs 90.31% 0.3241 mg/L 48.18 6.256 Ibs 87.01% m = m i w = = = = m = m t m A m s = m CFA - Chanhassen, MN Outfall 8 R Outfall 9 ST,?B Outfall 7 Outfall 5J 1_ Outfall 2 g Outfall 4 ST-13 Project File: hydraflow_031516.stm I Number of lines: 9 Date: 3/16/2016 blomJ mVIV.VV M M M M M M M M M M M w M M M M M M M Storm Sewer OF Curves OF file: IDF_RPBCW_MN.IDF Int. (inlhr) 14.00 — - - 14.00 100-Yr 12.00 12.00 10-Yr 10.00 10.00 2-Yr 8.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 -- - 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Time (min) Storm Sewers Hydraflow OF Report Pagel of 1 Return Period Equation Coef iclents (FHA) (Yrs) B D E (NIA) 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -- 2 25.1398 5.1000 0.6950 ---- 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 --- 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 10 34.6190 4.6000 0.6667 25 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 50 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 100 33.1476 1.4000 0.5319 - Intensity = B / (Tc + D)AE Return Period Intensity Values (in/hr) (Yrs) 5 min 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 5.04 3.81 3.12 2.68 2.36 2.12 1.93 1.78 1.66 1.55 1.46 1.38 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 7.66 5.79 4.76 4.09 3.62 3.26 2.98 2.75 2.56 2.41 2.27 2.15 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 12.35 9.08 7.49 6.50 5.81 5.30 4.90 4.58 4.31 4.08 3.88 3.71 c=t.h .um T.k 5 M M M M M M Storm Sewer Tabulation Page 1 Station Len Dmg Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vol Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Gmd / Rim Elev Line ID Incr Total co eff (q flow full Line To Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope On Up On Up On Up Llne (ft) (ae) (acl (C) (min) (min) (In/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/9) (In) M (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 End 51.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 5.0 0.0 11.30 7.65 9.25 15 1.20 944.48 945.09 945.69 946.97 948.70 946.34 ST-5 2 End 21.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 5.0 0.0 10.57 17.56 6.79 21 1.05 945.50 945.72 946.48 946.93 947.25 949.85 ST-8 3 2 8.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.0 5.0 0.0 10.57 17.16 5.96 21 1.00 945.72 945.80 946.93 947.01 949.85 950.15 ST-10 4 End 57.000 0.06 0.20 0.95 0.06 0.15 5.0 6.0 11.4 1.68 2.29 3.37 12 0.35 945.90 946.10 946.45 946.78 950.45 949.05 ST-13 5 4 85.000 0.14 0.14 0.64 0.09 0.09 5.0 5.0 12.3 1.11 2.29 2.15 12 0.35 946.10 946A0 948.85 946.94 949.05 949.40 ST-15 6 End 29.000 0.06 0.06 0.93 0.06 0.06 5.0 6.0 12.3 0.69 2.27 2.60 12 0.34 945.90 946.00 946.25 946.39 960.00 948.50 ST-18 7 End 29.000 0.12 0.12 0.93 0.11 0.11 5.0 5.0 12.3 1.38 2.27 3.22 12 0.34 945.90 946.00 946.40 946.68 950.06 948.50 ST-21 8 End 29.000 0.23 0.23 0.92 0.21 0.21 5.0 5.0 12.3 2.61 3.20 4.51 12 0.69 945.90 946.10 946.59 946.79 950.00 949.10 ST-24 9 End 80.000 ILI 0.16 0.16 0.89 0.14 0.14 5.0 5.0 12.3 1.76 5.10 4.83 12 1.75 945.90 946.95 I 946.31 I 947.51 I 950.35 949.95 I ST-28 I CFA - Chanhassen, MN Number of lines: 9 Run Date: 3/16/2016 NOTES:Intensity = 33.15 / (Inlet time + 1.40) A 0.53; Return period =Yrs. 100 ; c = cir a = eilip b = box Storm sv ma v10.00 Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: hydraflow_031516.stm Elev. (fl) d o $ d r yj 0 00 $ a� - ia$ o d w ,4 E> 957.00 957.00 964.00 954.00 951.00 951.00 948.00 948.00 945.00 945.00 942.00 942.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 HGL - EGL Reach (ft) Storm Sewers Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: hydraflow_031516.stm Elev. (ft) 958.00 �a� Bid A + m�5 mod, 2R�uri aS8 o wG>i6 Ksr g �o loss 0 1°ij 0 WE 958.00 955.00 955.00 952.00 952.00 949.00 949.00 946.00 946.00 21. 943.00 943.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 HGL EGL Reach (ft) Storm Sewers Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: hydraflow_031516.stm Elev. (ft) rp c oSe �' W 0 q�00 � E Q� $ voo O WWUI E s � Kc� J 0 qO o a$ E ! — aD K� 959.00 959.00 956.00 956.00 953.00 953.00 960.00 950.00 947.00 947.00 944.00 944.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 HGL EGL Reach (ft) Storm Sewers Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: hydraflow_031516.stm Elev. (ft) ��o S ui S +�W 0 m 0 5 e ppQQ + ool 959.00 959.00 956.00 956.00 953.00 953.00 950.00 950.00 947.00 947.00 0 34% 944.00 944.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 HGL EGL Reach (ft) Storm Sewers Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: hydraflow_031516.stm Elev. (ft)`*� �� pp gOO B I'd e m r pp� J p^ J� mn o ww E 959.00 959.00 956.00 956.00 953.00 953.00 950.00 950.00 947.00 947.00 f- 2 O L 944.00 944.00 0 10 20 HGL EGL 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Reach (ft) Storm Sewers Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: hydraflow_031516.stm Elev. (ft) roc 0 0 g w S 0 ILL DO o � c p ui p m E� WE 959.00 959.00 956.00 956.00 953.00 953.00 950.00 950.00 947.00 947.00 12' a 0 944.00 944.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 HGL EGL Reach (ft) Storm Sewers Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: hydraflow_031516.stm Elev. (ft) e A 8ui S w maw a 5 e0 h to S as uiw �'_ 958.00 956.00 955.00 955.00 952.00 952.00 949.00 949.00 946.00 946.00 - �'� 943.00 943.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 100 HGL EGL Reach (ft) Storm Sewers HR�Gre�e INLET CAPACITIES ' Project #: 86150413 Project: CHICK-FIL-A By ECH Date 3/16/2016 Location: CHANHASSEN, MN Checked Date Revised Date Structure Number Frame and Grate Flow (CFS) Water Depth (ft) Required to Accommodate Flow PendingDepth (ft) Provided ST-14 R-3235 TY A 0.76 0.15 0.41 ST-16 R-3235 TY A 1.09 0.20 0.41 ST-19 R-3235 TY A 0.67 0.15 0.50 ST-22 R-2504 TY D 1.41 0.20 0.50 ST-25 R-2504 TY D 2.62 0.40 0.90 2X2 STD CURB GR 2.45 0.22 0.35 R-3235 TY A 0.52 0.15 1 0.55 M_2926 Inlet Capacities per [DOT Design Manual ' Neenah R-3235 Type A Grate 0.9 = Free open area of grate (sq. ft.) 4.5 = Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) Ponding 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.17 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.85 1.00 125 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.25 4.50 Notes: 1 1 - Capacity Calculation - Weir Orifice Net Weir/Orifice Flow Type Equation Equation Capacity ratio 0.15 0.97 0.15 0.16 Weir Flow 0.43 1.37 0.43 0.31 Weir Flow 0.78 1.68 0.78 0.47 Weir Flow 0.95 1.79 0.95 0.53 Weir Flow 1.21 1.94 1.21 0.62 Weir Flow 1.69 2.17 1.54 0.78 Transition Flow 2.22 2.37 1.84 0.93 Transition Flow 2.80 2.56 2.14 1.09 Transition Flow 3.42 2.74 2.46 1.25 Transition Flow 4.08 2.91 2.79 1.40 Transition Flow 4.77 3.06 3.06 1.56 Orifice Flow 5.51 3.21 3.21 1.71 Orifice Flow 6.27 3.36 3.36 1.87 Office Flow 7.07 3.49 3.49 2.02 Orifice Flow 7.91 3.63 3.63 2.18 Orifice Flow 8.77 3.75 3.75 2.34 Orifice Flow 10.58 4.00 4.00 2.65 Orifice Flow 13.50 4.33 4.33 3.12 Orifice Flow 18.87 4.84 4.84 3.89 Orifice Flow 24.80 5.31 5.31 4.67 Orifice Flow 31.25 5.73 5.73 5.45 Orifice Flow 38.18 6.13 6.13 6.23 Orifice Flow 45.56 6.50 6.50 7.01 Orifice Flow 53.36 6.85 6.85 7.79 Orifice Flow 61.56 7.19 7.19 8.57 Orifice Flow 70.15 7.51 7.51 9.35 Orifice Flow 79.10 7.81 7.81 10.12 Orifice Flow 88.40 8.11 8.11 10.90 Orifice Flow 98.03 8.39 8.39 11.68 Orifice Flow 108.00 8.67 8.67 12.46 Orifice Flow 118.28 8.93 8.93 13.24 Orifice Flow 128.87 9.19 9.19 14.02 Orifice Flow Equations used Q=O.6A(2gh)"0.5 Orifice equation Q=31o(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A= free open area of grate P= weir perimeter h= feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sectsec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80% of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Inlet Capacities per IDOT Design Manual Neenah R-2504 TY D Grate 0.9 = Free open area of grate (sq. ft.) 6 = Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) - Capacity Calculation -- Weir Orifice Net Weir/Orifice Flow Type Ponding Equation Equation Capacity ratio 0.05 0.20 0.97 0.20 0.21 Weir Flow 0.10 0.57 1.37 0.57 0.42 Weir Flow 0.15 1.05 1.68 1.05 0.62 Weir Flow 0.17 1.26 1.79 1.22 0.71 Transition Flow 0.20 1.61 1.94 1.42 0.83 Transition Flow 0.25 2.25 2.17 1.77 1.04 Transition Flow 0.30 2.96 2.37 2.13 1.25 Transition Flow 0.35 3.73 2.56 2.52 1.45 Transition Flow 0.40 4.55 2.74 2.74 1.66 Orifice Flow 0.45 5.43 2.91 2.91 1.87 Orifice Flow 0.50 6.36 3.06 3.06 2.08 Orifice Flow 0.55 7.34 3.21 3.21 2.28 Orifice Flow 0.60 8.37 3.36 3.36 2.49 Orifice Flow 0.65 9.43 3.49 3.49 2.70 Orifice Flow 0.70 10.54 3.63 3.63 2.91 Orifice Flow 0.75 11.69 3.75 3.75 3.12 Orifice Flow 0.82 13.37 3.92 3.92 3.41 1.00 18.00 4.33 4.33 4.15 Orfice Flow 1.25 25.16 4.84 4.84 5.19 Orifice Flow 1.50 33.07 5.31 5.31 6.23 Orifice Flow 1.75 41.67 5.73 5.73 7.27 Orifice Flow 2.00 50.91 6.13 6.13 8.31 Orifice Flow 2.25 60.75 6.50 6.50 9.35 Orifice Flow 2.50 71.15 6.85 6.85 10.38 Orifice Flow 2.75 82.09 7.19 7.19 11.42 Orifice Flow 3.00 93.53 7.51 7.51 12.46 Orifice Flow 3.25 105.46 7.81 7.81 13.50 Orifice Flow 3.50 117.86 8.11 8.11 14.54 Orifice Flow 3.75 130.71 8.39 8.39 15.58 Orifice Flow 4.00 144.00 8.67 8.67 16.61 Orifice Flow 4.25 157.71 8.93 8.93 17.65 Orifice Flow 4.50 171.83 9.19 9.19 18.69 Orifice Flow Notes: 1 Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)A0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)A1.5 Weir equation where: A= free open area of grate P= weir perimeter h= feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80% of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Nyloplast 2' x 2' Curb Inlet Diagonal Grate Inlet Capacity Chart 11.00 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 'u A 5.00 U 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 High Hood Setting (8.47" Curb Setting) Mid Hood Setting (6.47" Curb Setting) Low Hood Setting (4.47" Curb Setting) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 Head (ft) Nyl ®lasf 3130 Verona Avenue • Bulord, GA 30518 (866)888-84791(770)932-2443• Fax: (770)932.2490 0 Nyloplast Inlet Capacity Charts June 2012 calculated by: ECH CFA- Chanhassen (Restrictor Weir Overflow) date: March 17, 2016 Weir Overflow Calculator - Q=CLH 3/2 Broad Crested Weir Equation W.i, 1n1n11 OUTPUT (1): Weir length based on 0.0 cfs inputed discharge OUTPUT (2): Actual discharge based on 5.0 feet designed weir Weir Length Required (ft) = 0.0 Discharge (0) through weir (ff/s) = 4.4 > 0.0 = 100 yr Q (fl'/s) Weir Area (112) = 0.6 Weir Area (ft') = 2.86 Weir Velocity ft2/sec) = 0.00 Weir Velocity ft'/sec = 1.54 User Input Section Values used in Calculations 100 year Discharge (Q) Into Basin (ft3/s) = 2.92 = C, value from "Standard Handbook For Civil Engineers", page 21-79, table 21-15 Flow Depth Through Weir (ft) = 0.45 0.45 = flow depth, this value must fall between 0.2 and 5.5 Weir Breadth ft = 0.5 0.5 = weir breadth, this value must fall between 0.5 and 15.0 Weir Length Provided ft = 5.0 Breadth - length measured across the top of the weir Tab 3 Exhibits �cro:� H YN STORM TAGS ST-1 EXIST. STM CB RIM = 947,76 INV = 143.26 W 18' IHV = 943.66 5 24- wV = 944.zt N Is' INV = 944.31 E 12' ST-2 29 ON BE EXIST. SS REP. 15- 0 5.34% SF-3 EXIST. FES. IS' INV = 945,7E ST-4 SENT SWR AN 5 DNA., R-1713 CIE (CONSTRUCT ONLINE OE EXIST. IS- Cl)R RIM = 90.70 INV = 94180 N 15 (EXIST.) INV = 944.48 5 15- (EXIST.) INV = 94{ 46 NE IS' Si-5 51 ON FT SS RCP. IS O 1.20% S7-6 FES RCP, IS- W/ GRATE INV = 945.09 ST-2 FES FOR, 21- W/ GRATE INV = 945.50 ST-6 21 ON R SS RCP. 21' 0 IOSW ST-9 STM SWR MH 5' DIA.. R-1713 CIE I RESTRICIOR STRUCTURE. SEE DETAIL FOR WEIR WMEN510MS) RIM = 949.85 1.25WIDE WEIR INV = 945.67 INV = 945.7E N 21- INV = 945.]2 5W 21' ST-10 8 ON FT SS ADS N-12 WE, 21- 0 L03% ST-11 NTLOPIAST 30' STRUCTURE W/ H-20 SOLID GR RIM = 150.15 INV = 94580 HE. NW, SW (STORMTECH) INV = 945.80 S 21- ST-12 NYLOPLAST 30- STRUCTURE N/ H-20 SOLID GR RIM = 950.45 INV = 945.90 NW (STDRMTECH) INV = 945,90 E I2- 51-13 57 ON R SS ADS N-12 WT, I2- O 035% ST-14 STM SWR CB ON, R-3235 TY A GRATE T/C = WAR AS INV = 946.10 W 12' INV = 946.10 NE 13 ST-I5 85 LIN FT SS RCP. 12' O 0.35% ST-I6 STM SWR CD 2' MA R-3235 0 A GRATE T/C 449.91 INV = 946.40 SW 12 ST-17 NYLOPIAST 30- STRUCTURE W/ H-20 SOLID OR RW = 9WOO INV = 945,90 NW. SE (STDRMTECH) INV = 9.5.99 SW 12- 5E-18 29 ON FT SS ADS N-12 YET, 12- a 0.34% ST-19 STM SWR ON i' OM R-3235 0 A GRATE T/C = 948.O INV = 946.00 HE 12' ST-20 NTLOPLAST 30- STRUCTURE A/ H-20 SWD OR RIM = 950.05 INV = 945,90 NW, BE (STDRMTECH) INV = 945,90 SW 12- ST-21 29 ON R SS ADS N-12 W. 12' e OUR ST-22 STM SwR CS 2' CIA R-2504 TY D GRATE RIM = 948.50 INV = 946.00 HE 12" ST-23 HYLOPLAST 10 STRUCTURE W/ H-20 SOLID OR RIM = 950.W INV = 945.90 NE, BE (STDRMTECH) INV = 945.90 ON IS' ST-24 29 U. FT SS ADS N-12 WT, 15' O 0-69% ST-25 TEA SWR OR 2' DN R-2504 TY D GRATE RIM = 949.10 INV = 94fi.10 BE 15 ST-26 NYLOPLAST 10' DIA. DRAIN BASIN. 2X2 STANDARD CURB 6R T/C = 950.1E INV = 945.90 NW. BE (STDRMTECH) ST-27 OLOPLAST 30' STRUCTURE W/ H-20 SOLID OR RIM = 950.35 INV = 945.90 HW, $w (STDRMTECH) Ixv = 945.90 $E 12' ST-28 60 ON FT SO ADS N-t2 AT. 12- . 1,75% ST-29 STM SWR CB 4' DM R-3235 TY A GRATE T/C = 950.3E INV = 946.95 NW IE' INV = 946.95 SE 8 ST-30 13 LIN FT SS PVC OUR 26. 0' (ROOF DRAIN) e 2,00% WY e W WYE = 94].05 MV e E WYE = 9A].I5 INV O REDO = 947. 21 (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT/PLANS) 51-11 CLEANOUT (SEE DETAIL) RIM = 950.7E INV = 94].1] ST-32 57 LIN FT SS PVC SOR 26, 0' (ROOF DRAM) O F.Op% St-33 CLEANOUT (SEE DETAIL) RIM = 950 SS INV = 947.6E ST-34 6 ON FT SS PVC SOR 25. 0- (ROOF DRAIN) O 300% INV O ST-32 = 947.32 INV O BFDG = 947 44 (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT/P4NS) ST-35 5 ON FT SS PVC SOT 26. 8' (ROOF DRAIN) O 2.OD% INV O ST-32 947,58 INV O %DG = 947.70 (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT/PUMS) Si-36 23 ON FT SS PVC SOFT 26. 0' (ROOF DRAIN) O 1.OU% g_p CLEANOUT (SEE DETAIL) RIM = 951.05 INV = ,7] 38 ST-38 2 ON FT 5S PVC SDR 26. 0" (ROOF DRAIN) O 200% INV O WV a aloc = 90.10 (VERIR WITH ARCHITECT/PUNS) SI-39 FES. 12- INV = 941.50 Si-40 25 ON FT SS CMP. 12' O 2.00% 51-41 FES. 12' INV = 948.CO - ? - WEST 79TH STREET MA UEASE PARCil T0TAL AREA - 57.580 3 PROP. IMPERVIOUS - 44,638 SE PROP. PERVIOUS = 12,960 SF OEENTION STORAGE WLVME REWIRED. 7.154 OF VOLUME FROVIOEO: 7.279 6F GRADING & UFJUNAGLNQILb LEGEND, NR BUILDINGUR aF snE PIA4 COCUYENS M10 MSGN Sqi E%KF BUIl01NG MlES CONNECTION ltG1MN5. KNOTUTCT L DESCH FOR OQpIES MFA OF OfPE11'Sm SDFM/LK _ XXX.MX ° A)6IQ OIIIIE SFOi EITE1 CRUISE TRIP ENS/D �CCESS. N10 EXRCH CFME CAffA4 TRIP RN,C: EIEYAIIGMS. A`K To BE ET wm B! 111E eiR.lI1IECW ME CRIB MLTY SHRIKE SIZES i0 TN S = OEMGIES NYA E CfRE52m CUf® .ION T UfTION WITH ME CONTRACTOR PVLL COGROIAWI ICORMOTS OF LEWGTI HOIFD IX1 ANTS. r� PRCFO.iD CRNNa£ fIFC(aN KSURES/YMECE5 MOMOUAL COYPAVIES, i0 AWID CONNCIS MO EHSORE PROPER HET. ANE ARRO. MPON' IOIIENUS THE JWIAYCTHE URM EW W/CMIS 51W E YET. A$ �� NIFA Cf REVERE (SH1H4) S PRO pL DE CWl THE UIMY TIE-INS/CWHERECNS PIBOR TO COMCICIE CUT® ND GURFA. CONCRETE NIMIT, PROPOSED O•E1W1VR OESi%IION NMCINC ro ME I,IIRY/SEANCE. WIRE CCNFUCNS EMMONIIT ME E MOVE NIMMEM RESO SATE PI/N5, ENdxEER IS m BE NonElm PRIM r0 caN51PVrnW TO ESE1E sARE. � r:°i.nm aPEx a+Mm THE BJTOW PM MEA AND NEAS TO BEFA W BEEN COMPACTED IN NUN THEE PLANS AND SPEC6 CKTIMS MO ME MCWMENMnONS SET FORUM IN THE GEOMCHNICKL REPORT. SUBI MATERIAL FOR SIOEWN%5. CURB, OR ASPHALT SHALL BE FREE OF OMN,ICS MD OTHER UNSURO E WTEAWS. SHOU0 SUREAE BE DETENTE UNSUUI$E BY OZER OR BWNEP'S REMESEMAITYE, SU9BME IS TO E MMONEU MD MI NTH MNiOVED FILL WTERLLL COMPACTED AS OIRECRn BY ME UEDTECHNICAL REPORT. NL MI COMPN:RW. MD EMOUTI MATERIAL$ WWI. FUNUI,FY U UNER.M. SHNL BE AS PER ME RECDMMENDATIMS PRCI IN ME UEOTECHNICAL REPORT AN S BE COORDINI MIN ME MPUM CLE UOUry WMPMY SPEGRCUIONS, THE WNIRIGIOR SIWL COMPLY TO ME FULLEST EXTENT NRN ME uIEST OSHA STORM JS AND REGUUTIMS. OR ANY OMEA TGENC(` HPNNG JURISDICTION FOR EXGNATON MD TRENCHING PROCEDURES. ME CONTI 6 ISUNTE FOR M CITEWIWING E TERNS W METHWS' EWIED m MEET ME INTENT ARE RmVMVNCE GNFFA E OSN AS NFEL AS Ntt OTHER ENOry TWT WS AREStlCIKKI FOR EX AnobI /OR TRENCHING PROCEDURES. THE TOPS OF EX51EC YNRKLLS HET STRUCTURES. MR) SNtlTMY CIfINWT TMS SSW- BE Nj,MED. N REQUIRED. TO BUNCH PROPOSED (FOES N N:CORDWCE NIIN NL MPLCABIE STAN]WDS. THE COMMUTER IS RESPONSIBLE NF 5 UNK N OF EXISNG TOA%AIARC KCRyATpN Na InNY IR4AP ELEVAlIDl6 NORM ro COWEH4IFNT CF IMF EMNOS. UT. S. NNOCCU ro LVE O CONCRETE SLOPE KOM ILL ISLMDS. GUTTERS. INU CIPREM N, P M NL WNDe suRMER MF 151[ NNLUY M P;RI S RE AOR PR MELT G .WY IIN;RS TWT WY .EARN THE NINJIN $REFRY M , PROCEEDING CAS Nm IEMIf1FD ro ME ENDNEEA N IS EMI SO AT E PROCEIDNG wCA cRNSIINCIIOX BNAIP N°IIFIG110N IS OGE m a 1M CONIRACmR'S OM1 RISK. N CAE OF CISCREPMCIEs BET NEIIM PLANS M REUINE TO OILIER PLSI6. TE SERE NIN MLL TAKE PRECEDENCE - NMEOIPRLY NORFY ME DIMMER IN WRITING OF ANY CONRT .. CMIRCRON SMALL E NEOUIRED TOSECURE NL REOSSURN PERMITS AIM) NtAO(NS FOR NL RAI WRRN sWBCES AND MPOY1 SMOL RES. CURRAOON PZ $UPRY A COPY OF NPNO'NS TO ENGINEER! Nm OmFR PRIM To WDLSnNC MONK. SITE MUNI EMLL NO PROCEED NRE ER09FE CIXRNCt MEAMES NOW ®M INSF.WFD. SEE EROSION CONTROL PLM FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MO NOES NL EXISFM SRUOIIGSS. UNLESS OMERMSE NGIm TO FEIWN. FENCIRG. TROS. k ETC.. MRMN CONSrNUCN LKNLS SWL BEREMUED a CUFOED OF OFF SUE. NO ON SITE BURNING MULL E OUDM O NL PLRVX£ STRUCTURES SWL E PE -USE. NL ORNNME STRUCTURES MD SBRM 1. PIES SNALL MEET NFAW DUTY TRN TIC (HSU) LNLING AND BE INSRRUER ICCOF WNCLY. CEN. CMV,CTM 9ULL NGRRY .ML UTILITY CWPMIES WING UNDERCRMNO UFURES M STE M R RKNT-OF-BY PRIM TOEXuvATMN. CONIR4 TOR CUMICF UUIILY LOCATING COMPANY M° LOCATE NL UTILITIES PRIM TO TRACING SRMR. NO P.M OF TIE NRSOED NOJECT 6 LOCATED WITHIN A FLOCO IVSIMI ARFp ,I AFTNATMNS SPERM ME O ECCE E PAMELFRR UNLESS OMERMSE NOm ON PM` NL CONCRETE CURB M BUFFER SHNL E TYPE B-G.UW CURB UNLESS UMWNISE NOTED M ME PINS W1CH EXISTING CRUDES AT PROPERTY IAES NIO/OR CMSIRIICFIM UMm SU Iu TO ME TOP OF CURBS. SURE SIPLL E MICED TO PONCE PoSFM1F NUMYE AWY FROM BURI ILL SER If CROSS SLOPES SHNL BE A MAgMUM OF 3M. E9MMEp WNOIOP PARMNG NEAS FULL E CRISIS) TO A WXWM OF 2S SLOPES IN PAVEMENT SIWL BE UNIFORM TO ANMD FORCING CP PAVNIEM. ME COHTMCTM SUIT CONFINE HIS MOWN' OPENUMBU5 TU MTHN CONSTRUCTOR UNITS MO EASTNLTRS SHOM M THE RAPS. INY EMMUNCE TO MMEMIES OUROOE ME SITE DWNOMY SHNL E AT ME SOLE ESPoNSIBNTY OF ME CONTWYTOR. ME CONRVCTOR SWVL APPLY RECES JR MGSNRE CONTROL TO ME CONSTRUCTION AREA MO TUUL TOMS TO PREWNi ME SPRENI OF OUR. ALL F1ELD TILES ENCOUNTERED $HALL BE REPLACED MD/ON CONNECIED TO THE STORM SFNEN SYSTEM AND LOCATED MD IDENTIFIED ON THE RECORD LAN P$ BY ME COMNAE. M NL STORM D kNAGE CONSTRUCTION SNNL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORWNCE MM ME CRY OF CIUHUSSO2 TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES: NL NME W pR DENIM. wNLO BIP wR ULFm m Raw OR MME awl E W. I701 m RITY CamwaTNx WIII.. Mr RDW M urE WM wl TRNEa o°xlRa awl E IN ARamMce wIx TE ulrn FEXrwN E IE WHIN M ViIYN 1R/FFa CMIRN EW3S aEWR CIIH➢ aa6 aD].EEa iM NL 9TYN% 0.0AFES. EX50nG K L;LNERAL NOTES: • MoSS" eB Puma, RNNS. NNE, SCM E Swu CMNLY M]w A0. ALL�IF/ 60116 AM BI..OICS INTO PNln6 STORM TAGS -1 m, TOM NL.WC{ SUMAC E N fLmWQ WN Q,N CIVfS /IO sar: s S2-}J XI., ]9- SnKNR w/ x-]p ID1N CA SIMpYPn 1gIIN- NNC iE0 ON, WE . . NFLLE E 1. = ,ayl6 w te'NN ME wnWLIOR NOI CMN0wM Ex utt . PPIRMSE E SNErt ECM ENS. Iw Nsw S z.- . ¢. IFRrOaxrzcrvl I NEB PNM m OMMUCTM . aN Ew M INr - -Is- CCR MMw m NRwa EwM% CQ MINIM a.0 xoEY TIE ,.w], E Iz MREAMIE GIY EMB EFER: pYIDNIS: _z ss .Mt,- • COIIWLIE ro wsY euu19 RVNZB01Is wm uaaClErnxL]L _ 2 - RI Nr. n- N INNS. R/LE L. bl FRYRSI JIM, EI.F➢1 NL P.GG PNMR/ SPEwW15 NO gISA1G. N.10E InWpl EIPNISNN • s.Yi XRIf EPIFEII 9£NNY.R Na PS.C. HNSEMEM. COOMv. 51-IS GOR-i50. T 0 0.urL fYN®1 .NOS TO E FWS1 NM SVIN.ICE ] all rti rs- NN_ ML PRONRN EB 9W1 E Ng2llm .. tll xn = I'l za NN P.I. NE ,s _ — — — — — — — — — — — OTHERINFINlICI6 INIY PN9 IXSIIA® and BE BERETa q — — — — — — — _ TE coxlRACMus EIRQrE Ixw . a2 SIANINM nN SwN NN N w. R VAR. . 5 Sr-ze .uzl SO- W.. owx u,w �y RI MF SIDE WNSMICRgI WIFIBN$ ION FyJPYIX! W TIE l[Ox510.KI OINwE M Clai. IS' IRS) I/C 9AS90 E]R�P-.N. IAGGEGAIE°UIID'EEA AT ME ____ IE COIRNCIW SVEL N0I 06NI® OEPUBIL MASS AEAS T = .A. ^' NN. u lSroRNIECN) SWE ELEVATION AS THE TRIBES OOCE THE CONSTRUCTION DIRT. TIE s- ([+rsl.l WEST 79TH STREET PUBLICLY DEgGIEO ECNT-CF-WAY SAIMINWS SURFACE j R=70: fii i �� f� `� by �ST-J6 _IO ST 1 s zz si-zl VV" ST-3]olsa' MPS 120 SFA1S IN90E, B AN. FIR. - (SEE CT NTECU SI sT Ill 5T-n S FOR FYAcr mlDm l\'p, WARY AND LAYOUT Inf \ TOMR S OII STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY PUBLICLY OEDICAIFD BM -OF -BY BITUMINOUS SURFl CONIRKIQ, SUIT NOT E PERMITTED To RMR W EfMCE v - REMIT., ,T-zz Irt nWNE ./ x-z0 SNL CN 'S SP.ES Ma EQPME ICI USE TTEE KEE E AS FOR STM NNFANS RNM E PNWWG .w0 EmIr2 xu1 wu E - _ ._l. xE IS - SBSR To ]E MPNwN OF THE CMRFN I. . .. . IN 1„ORxrEcx) THE CIXRRaTW IS RREEMIS 1E FOR RER/GWC ANY NEAS E 5 11 UN IT II xcx, RS M _ lll.M SE ti PNflpE NI SMIPWN NJ! m E EL0.ID TINT 5 MANNED EE ro EFIWIML EpR,FNr wl IE PMFIENF Ot E{YIL • I.K. Si-M W W n 55 xp5 N-tI IT. I - As TE CM MIXED WY E R SINCE NKE N UNORRI -e Iw .1.SIv ME n a5M N NNERE ILMEM Nar MIEN RBE a CINN THE - Ir/ p4 a t. aN6' .1. N EPI.I SIT FEARMES NE NNE INNI THE SVE Er. 6 OP6tm BE TE EISiFFA M TE ON. SwR t9 . W v-Si55 T x MnR •O ' _ => .ALL MR6RBalIIXI ATTAIN R91C I,.F/FAENENrs MO/OI NIY -r ND LN6TN FmMYNaR x E, swrar =NP. E� w/ UNA E . ME ON, ma@VCYSFONOKMINS PER, r/c - WsE0N.ss] M,z MMAEMMpVUS M = ,.B.,S s e -e Il M P ISe, S s tl n M IT, ss erc sM s- INvvE BRaW) O _ -N Six PROP. xH . - ns 0U . pRCR.I.P. sE SE[ OETM . 1NK-1 = = 91 n1..1 9 f NNM_O,F RSTINN—KI, AxW0[NTTwMYNNRNCs5 / NUR) INN _ W12=A I1- W.-111.11 ,EE �^IT, F IW n si we mR n. e- IwNF uuWl _ II WYLONUIST W_ zmurnlN x/ H-zo Souo • rwM -], urAauR RUE N NIQ - rvv ,N�021 B IW N. RNP 1.63 IN I, UN IT . PvcR. zM za e' 1„ctt OWIO oaS S xr NtlN. xw ISrowTEcp I. a z1-,L W111 ' - M Ntl.,9 [ IF-Ivf]W1 w N A1nMTN1/r,Wls) [Dwz s,v aRK ,.vsxuwtz ® • O.a. -SS I M ITIS P.S Sw 24 0 1. PNRN) ® 4tF` j 5T-]2 _ ® RN = ..'a IIIsr PUN`,w,tx Axvrzo/NRArvzI i1 TRASH ENCLOSURE GRADING DETAIL = WE a NE 1r _N M 11 IF RRC I. z]. 9- (Fool o J., c-L SCALE Y-10• -,S N M n ss NCl Rz s 1 w; PRO. VMPHF HDGHF • M.ssz _al Oi (u[ INiaN) SEGNEMAL BLOCN mR w i R ,tw T A wn _IIIUH _ Lea RETUNING N,, -,E T/C = eN.el W ex a 9U.W 5R-JO 9 +1 IN t] tl NC 5[N x -I) S1xuCN6 w/ H- M n SS . 0- U.OxAW) I.N ,.,.,0 S. CM SWm x:xax:x IF IS (u 1CxN[[N) 2N M n FI R Ni-,,, w,. tz _,N r, W M-J/ g A^ •OWi IN ,n50 SA EEII �f v saz T A cWN zz LN IT Ss 111, 12 kk D OUTSIDE S • \\\ xr . sacEo NE Ii a1 ns 1 T WUnwE x/ x e0 mom w I. . PRI. ENSIONS RNI a x . \• ~S, I -- PNCP. ouIDUUR 9 / IF lsmvxraN) sEARNc Mvb ! • , / }'V N. I.I.N. zN U. I' 2.. x. r E_ \ / /'f;2 R•" ' �� IN I'. MNw S.I-Z,a 1.0[WE L•?{2ti /C` MM = ,un Rd to 0 U CD Ill 41 !LASE LL STORE IM40 HANHASSEN FSU 45 W 79TH STOEE ANHASSEN, MN 5317 ,:;,m 8 03 • THE SO OF MITCH SYSTEM LL OMSSR 1..1. gUwBERS. R=2627.91' L=.�� wu INCH IO H,ES w MM aMIDm NARrwTE _ __, THE CH IGENS NEER LIE a1AIBRs MD a IRONS ABBE TE awBZCs Job No. :9515Q413. Is AE MAT MINE SHE TOP w ME, .uaErwTE ___ I Mu E aMN.Irn WM NI ERU YNEWTE WE URI Store :3919— MTWSE. ATE . AccREE�RUE a vz uaPm wnx M Iwwro Mzee 2 Date 23 I6 a�.m NM-. :02 In CNI TU xwEK ME REwI. .."MIC. BRAIN DawN TIME THERE MALL BE AS KOUOXN B INCH TRICK IGGIECAIE LLYEN TWr OREN. r0 Drawn B : MRJ Y l- THE NEST MU N.. GF ME FUAAIECYM NSUOU AS ROTED M THE ORMI a Moan R EASE .U- E Em¢BFm Checked R JFV Y' WITH TxE1S XM-P°01T1Ox°L cmll}RE AS W ME sUNNTEGH STEM. �IE1 • R C AssE TWr MF MEIN Ae l ,E I9MARw OPEN EOT CEIIEGTE INSE MALL BPCN. MM NKFEOUE w-SE M.ISE FO . • IMmEP M D srOR�F OLCSAATaea ® — O 10.1TM _ B.E CFS, 1,411 OF Mot - 9.091) . IZ-7 . lEu as 1.1% CF OIML - Nzs NOTES, The palm nes pew pol Ia cGhl .iln Ina Prommum, ar Me xPon Perm, Cona4uc0an $lwmeatw Pmmil imrea OR me Yinnewlo Part.tm Con. Pgm, I- PwMrges Imm Cm.,c Site Mmlies, 1. Site Desnifir., The ml1me', is a aeacription of The camtmi ion adiNty ell is the mold of him plan', CHICK -EL -A Cx4Nifili MN. The prWesee a elopmwof cw t c .G. otmolon of G yort,im, anan d a I .....t The omil bon .[knee. m1 site impm vet she me sae: uta clwnng, aemd, " gnitoo g. ma a. 9ma:nng, Fernstrom crosmmemem. inrtallGlion d alliti" Inc d�nrs orm w. I waim alma veaimwxotion co= meawr as a minimum. P. The fte-inert- peer Cc or The ntended sepamc of I mM;w smog .11 e f wC r pof u etvc4 l won as .1"Pin9. linermalar. and g E g. 1. segawae m m - C C r all a, fee.- 1) matGn wtt "tar lent e the" cm tmcOw entramo E) 1 e, ammNlon of InGFIR poring lot bnild,N and grvbp g. 5) mod. g ental .) underground uf1fitea Inecialian. 5) Fme gmding ;n pavement om and 6) pamment -mar ction. The sa and sedimentation [mLa items .111 are conaWdea as needed nanny the above can.mamm ani.iGw. Me that ore of the mnslmclian al. i. Is4. to Per 1.36 cp¢ The hat" area of the ate That n estimated For be i isturood py eacwotiw. gmding, or mho aof"-. is L2. acrw. IF The ert;mothe rarer. cwfements a1 No -ni mope of Ne sit. after emahachm G.0 W are cvnm^tea aver contaimi ned in me peat are,wge st tided I pGINEEPI MNWLE REPoRT for CHICe-FL-A CIWVHASSEN. se. v,n (loR.t -,,On data) upend q HR GHEw. Ixc. .nian :a ne.mr mcarpwanin Of ref.re- in I: men. 1,1-.m dewriping Ne eeile at the site :e cGmd-d In the Gealechnicol PI for 1M Ponied. snicn is nenbr, ;n-,,..l by rar.nnc.. o, in attachment ,a m1. plan. B Controls. Mrs selof F. pan dome- the era at na 1. pl larromme for h of me major c e v 1 cl tns d 0 d in 1 p m F eon meaaare per awe t t n tr ponsiau for its man-tw Indimtea. COOT aacn c m,nea he rat i. ciall-ion Gn larm..Fech art otmOme la, ona de apart of. thin phn. Faeroe ona Sediment Curt a (0 -NI ii-ION OWNCEs. Pmridea pad. Is o aescrlpem a interim andpamment spraI ellaaing note-.pecik scnedalirg d ma Or'"tmirrapon eon" of the prac[:cee. site plans sIt ensue IM eeis4rq r gatahan is 11...led note alminoble and diam,nea portion, all m. a,..iu e. a"aaed. Ermi, m F-ded in F a (I) (I) and iG. efamlaeaon mmeme. mil be imamea as .... a. prom['. m partian. a me .ite enew conawmm omrlties new le oPwony a 1.harxr c peep, . In w. m re the, lY a after the r canarvmm actrin, m that partm. al me I.,. she. stmmm mwq .n1 not oc ar fen a paroa m n or "I'med , days. (A) se ere On inihmm a "'I" "Eme mwaart I the Non pay after O.-P m aci:My Wygromr or svnramnMr cws 1-1,aed br -0. cone.. staeliamon mwm.a awn Go ;mhI as - as pmchmWe mawfle. lee faterel ldwim ml pammentshe Implementedrtmilixmppomm. ae am Ed Implemented to alma., m. d;rtaM1N wf Gr vtca I. Permanent seedirp/wd zIntel protection 5. Balmier nla A sNit ihsed omWctim.Monet. SIRUCNPAL MNCT'CES. Prwideo help. is a aewriptim of "'0"" plao'cw fiGt .in pe immemantN. Ia the aegrte mmnaae. to aims. ties. lr- at,. soils, mare neon. w atMr.iw limit nxMf me ON dsom"' Or poll,mrs from map areas W the late. The ,me,'btirm a men. ds- they be eabjecl to Section .Da of tM Oevn Yptn M. 1. Amn xsa "atom 1. elemental seeding 3. In. pmlemm P. Stamvaer Mpmagemsel. (i) Trani bone a o dnm'plian of m.... me that Wn be innalled dm'ng the cm.r chart pro". t0 0-. pGol.ce. In immersions, that MIN r all crosiuman III ,mend name been p.ted. Th. intInstallationthee of . armcw may be to $[mA coon W of the Clean wets Act. The am. cta lee -pon 'tmm .m. aelonmd Trena s fee I -cm II tarred I. NO s Stanaa d $per . tar SON Forered SM- 14 Contra. and amen ome- "pea -in The SPsmdyhnamarh. The sr-mer pal Ted am1M meamns aimed 'nc W. I 5't ifter fonts d. storm mmm z. ache, Cmwle. (;) Wert. OmPa.ot 11. said sarte remands nodding From aanamdio _ 1(- - - - - - O PIR . ildu MTER FORM v")� mnm,a...cove -II mat...,, mamma C, Imis a. area ,emv 1 \ I GO 0.11-1.1 ona eimm" aN-ail. by me mlmdor. Th. canhoctw is reonsiel, W ocq,.m any p-A ree,inad for wch 1 e i.powl. Burningman me site .:II rwl pe permixed. o sdim matenas, :rclua:n9 builaiv ma\.tidbit awl' pe diachorged 'mta Wden all me State, atop! es monsoon of o Sechm e01 permit (I;l RG Pirmo s ofmB plan ml anon w aem.cw res omega -_____ .m apprcuenle stale m'/ar Goal east. d.poaal. ee,mnr or .epca ante m amen _ _ _ _ WEST 79TH STREET PURI OEDIGTED Re -YqY -- BINMINOW S=RPMCE --- - 95 F PROP. smDG NEA (SFE p Pde r I RORCROII � ) f �l P' yEB lie- Ex'- ---- PROP. 9 50. Ypi ____°F iw 9e _____ _________ FENCE SILT ) T__ .__ FENCE) (1W.) STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 5 Valk L£ W'DM RIGHF-OF-WAY PI DEDIGTW WGET-OF-WAY BITUMINOUS SURFACE (SEE OETNL) T z MITI, CONCRETE ASHOOr "N" (SEE OEM,) 1 01 s w EG N DENOTES ARM OF DEPRESSED SIIOEIRM DEN016 III OF DELRESSED CORE wnN tENGRI R(OE0 ON PJNS. ^ear CENOTES AREA OF REVERSE (ST11NC) CONCRETE COFOI " GOTTEA. R'Ig1E5 NEA TO MERE IUP-W AND STl IED CIXlmhucy N ENTEPONCE (sEE OCR IS). DENOTES PFH. FA NWLO. PJRRIER (%T Q VL� Exi N.. I Monx-TIOx NN pTCTI CHEIX ~ DENOIEs PROPoSEO OVERFLaw )M2CTIOR .maw. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. SRE OLAIIIG 51WL LqF PRIX£ID IMII EP03O1x CONTROL 1EwsRES NME av1 116EALlm. 2 U1NIE ENCES,00 9MO.T ON NL SLOPES OF 5:1 OR OFATER 1 NL 5R61TB NO ORN MMS INM w KEPT CLEW AT ALL TR6. {. F ANT IDgIpWI SOIL MKINOR MEeKP ES ME DFFNED NEC6SMY W DE CRY MCONEEN OR HIS REPRE5EMATRE. TIEM MEASURES MI BE IMMEOWTFLY IMPtEMERFE➢ BY THE CONTRACION. 5. 121g2 ALL .1 TRµSEpbdD grt0 ME ROM OR AIN IUNG moPFRIY M TRz Ex0 OF FAa xnRN w.Y. S _+ Get # b 1�RYV s\ / y G-Gsi wro: CER PUPA J / EENCE MP) i _ EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. INnNL F£RIMEnF SILT FENCE ]. INSINL SIABLL2EII CONSIftUCTION ENIRMICE 1 IWM OpNON OF ENEO PARKING IAr ONE NEITENNG A TREE RENMRL AHD TRA RIFT- NG. Yon ME NECESSwv 5. STPoP M'0 SIOCKRIE TCVSpL SFAHl.lE STOCKPII£S IN lA vets. 6. CORF I.£ MCMNG. STIEIIIEE CgIHIIEO.SAS Milli P essfeeT STA$lunON OR IRIIIM1E NdAS (yel INC Me55 IIDI$) MOI TENPORMAIH Y IIRAIXM 'Mill. Ili OOPS. 1. INSTNL LTEM . STORM SEWER, (ONE " CUTTER. TOM I NED WM1ET PR01ECT.EF e. APPLY STONE TO PARKING AREA E CONSTRUCT BUILDINGS 10, CONPIEIE OWING AND INSTNL PETMYM SEMNG AND PVHIINGs. 11. COMPLETE FINAL PA"i II, WHEN ALL CONSONCIION ICRill IS COMPLETE N1D ME STE IS STABI TI Ri IM' R'S"Ad" G pSNRBED RI li. RELU£ ALL TENP)RNEY EROSION CCNLRS MEAAMS ONCE YEGRAITON RETCHES MCONEFIICE, IA CON OCA rOR 5H4L MNF1S TO ALL FAOASNRI$ eat REOUIRETIENTs OF NOTED IN ME SrpUR6sTM PCLLMdI PRCIEPTON PVN FOR 1K5 PROJECT 15. MICIPATED PROJECT STIM 115 7/t/16 AND RE ANTICIPATED %KUEC1 COMREFOR! DATE IS 2/l/11, Tab 4 References LOCATION INFORMATION: Name: Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed Centroid, Minnesota, US` Latitude:44.8630 Longitude:-93.5014 ' Duration Unit 5 minutes 10 minutes 15 minutes 30 minutes ' 60 minutes 2 hours 3 hours ' 6 hours 12 hours 24 hours ' Source: Atlas 14 2-year 10-year 100-year Depth (in) Depth (in) Depth (in) 0.42 0.64 1.03 0.61 0.93 1.50 0.75 1.14 1.83 1.06 1.63 2.65 1.38 2.15 3.71 1.70 2.68 4.76 1.89 3.00 5.50 2.21 3.51 6.52 2.53 3.97 7.04 2.87 4.27 7.41 wAU Minnesota Pollution Control Agency M xq a.,.aaom Imo, a,a..xa.x r....n.lr..u,r..s olnx.rx.. x. •.'re Nionevim til..lrlll^..I , ,\SFr1,, r, rI Design infiltration rates q<enrco Sean. pe¢I mR In Design Infiltration rases, in Inches per hour. for A, e, C, and D soil groups. Corresponding USDA soli classification and Unified soil Class l flea[fans ore Included. Note stiff A soils hove Iwo Infiltration rain that ere a to n"I a of soil see ture.• see to NH table gall llnlh.11mor l[ 5o11tnlur[z1 Can[spa cim, dreamt 1.11 CIa5511nevor a- A .. 1b1+ iravp r:F'h..veN.[ran[d gmrb. sanay 4uvels "naygavel 4[ gep8te0etl or undalm R�mlz. unoYB�av<Ii 6f1-sll{y gavels. silly faaay grdr[s wia"+.ls .,sv. rxn.8lad.n".1, arm, a fund �'.SP. ¢NP¢afen e.nm5mm sands. 3III" woes � us I SO Sly serfs. 111111.111.11 0.3 IbYn sM loom hln mluttous SdU matama[eoas slnz wkaic eh C 0.$ S+ml cilaam Nl sins. very lme urs, se,co aayey 8nesear, Day Won Lie .I....zrch. dasey SanpVBuvelt tl sfir,mam SC daye,ia ds.[uyeygave8ysands Cl-lmvnlasn[iyOuIe. vnnVmsnnatye (.."year WRtO OL ar.anit silo and [lays of My pNifidry case Cx- hNhy plastic flays and sandy[lays On � 093MVC sins and cl4z unriyo Posterns, r,r.w. a...,..,... a.era.».a...,....ia......rr+a.ala.......wnan ..mow .x..wr...�..x...m.nla..a.�aw........,�~...,...r..,�.......r�r.•e..,..,M..�,,«..'.,.M.,..w...r.....r.....r,,...•........r.a.r...., rc,........am...r....x.....P«......,.r.....ax....rxa....o....�.......,.:..,»wM....,�...xa.»......,..,...r.x..r.....r. s..a.+.... �.,n.r....,xe....r, ..icon:-: SOB"Imemks Tow August 30, 2000 DRAINAGE MANUAL 3.6.5(5) Table 3.11 SCS Curve Numbers for Urban Land Uses Cover Condition or Rotation Acres Per Practice Curve Numbers for Moisture Condition H Product A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Cultivated Land Without cooservdtiontrestmem 72 81 88 91 With conservation treatment 62 71 78 81 Pasture or Range Land Poor 68 79 86 89 Good 39 61 74 80 Meadow Good 30 58 71 78 Wood or Forest Land Poor thin stand, no mulch 45 66 77 83 Good 25 55 70 77 Open Spaces (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries) Good: 75%or more grass cover 39 61 74 80 Fair: 50%to 75%grass cover 49 69 79 84 Commercial and Business Areas (85% impervious) 89 92 94 95 Industrial Districts (72 % impervious) 81 88 91 93 Residential < 118 acre lot 65% impervious 77 85 90 92 1/4 acre lot 38% impervious 61 75 83 87 113 acre lot 30%impervious 57 72 81 86 %acre lot 25%impervious 54 70 80 1 85 1 acre lot 20% impervious 51 68 79 84 Paved Parking Lots, Roofs, Driveways 98 98 98 98 Streets and Roads paved with curb and storm drain 98 98 98 98 gravel 76 85 89 91 dirt 72 82 87 89 Marsh 85 85 85 85 Other Total Acres — Product Total = Product Total Weighted Runoff Curve Number = Total Acres = _ ' Source: SCS Hydrology Guide for Mummorts Figure 3-2 For land uses with impervious areas, curve numbers are computed assuming tha6 100aA ofrtmoff from impervious areas is directly comected to the drainage system Pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be equivale itto lawns in good condition and the impervious areas have a CN of 98 a Includes paved sheets M STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR CHIC%FIL A CHANHASSEN, MN CHIC%FIL A, INC LOCATION: 445 West 7911 Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 SECTION 24 TOWNSHIP 39N RANGE 26W TYPE OF WORK Demolition of an existing building & parking lot and the construction of a Chick-fil-A free standing restaurant, parking lot, and associated utilities. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE TODD M. RICHARDS LIC.NO. 52503 The storm water pollution prevention plan reflects the MPCA requirements for storm water management and erosion and sediment control. This plan was prepared in accordance with the General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity (MN R100001) for Phase II of the National Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). OFC iAtvrIASSEi F;ECZZI4 ED SCANNED MAR 18 2U16 CHMHRSSEiuPLP�'NI�u F S HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen. MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Contacts Owner: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Owner Address: 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, GA 30349 Owner Contact: Jason Hill, P.E. Phone: 404-684-8530 Alternate Contact: Candy Nooks Phone: 404-305-4898 ................................................................................................................................................ Contractor: TBD Contractor Address: Erosion Control Sup: TI3ll Phone: Alternative Contact: Phone: Parties Responsible for Long Term Operation and Maintenance of the Permanent Stormwater Management System Chick-fil-A: On -site storm sewer system and underground stormwater management system. SWPPP Page 4 of 13 It r HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. FIGURE I — PROJECT LOCAT/ON MAP SWPPP Page 5 of 13 A K HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. A. Purpose The project will consist of the demolition of an existing building, parking lot, and utilities and the construction of a Chick-fil-A restaurant, parking lot, stormwater sewer system, underground stormwater management facilities, and associated utilities. This SWPPP will include the following: • Define the characteristics of the site and the type of construction that will occur. • Describe the site plan. • Describe the practices that will be implemented to control erosion and the release of pollutants in storm water. • Create an implementation schedule. • Describe the final stabilization design to minimize erosion and prevent storm water impacts after construction is complete. B. Project Size Construction limits for the proposed improvements and associated stormwater BMP construction is estimated to be approximately 1.36 acres. C. Impervious Surfaces Note: The Chick-fil-A improvements will disturb area outside of the proposed lease limits. Re -grading of the existing vegetated swale south of the property is proposed. a. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing onsite impervious area is estimated to be 0.87 acres consisting of the building and associated parking lot. The impervious areas account for approximately 66% of the project area. b. PROPOSED CONDITIONS The project will result in an increase of impervious area from the existing condition. The proposed onsite impervious area is estimated to be 1.02 acres which is an increase of 11 percent. The site's stormwater management system has been designed to limit peak runoff rates at or below existing rates. D. Construction Type The project includes demolition of the existing commercial building & parking lot and the construction of the Chick-fil-A restaurant, parking lot, storm sewer system, underground stormwater management facilities, and other associated utilities. E. Receiving Water Body In the existing condition, the site currently sheet flows to an existing 15-inch flared end section that is tributary to the Minnesota DOT storm sewer system. The site has been designed to detain runoff and release stormwater at a controlled rate to the DOT system, matching existing drainage patters. The DOT stormwater system then flows south across STH No. 5. SWPPP Page 6 of 13 HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. F. Special or Impaired Waters on the Project Site There are no impaired waters within the project limits. The impaired waters discovered within one mile of the site include Lake Susan and Lake Lotus. The proposed Chick-fil-A project will have no effect on these existing impairments. G. NRCS Soil Types / Runoff Coefficients The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey designates the majority of the soils in the area as Le Sueur loam, Kilkenny -Lester loams, Cordova clay loam, and a smaller portion of Glencoe clay loam. The SCS soil map is attached in Appendix E. The proposed runoff coefficient for the site is 94. H. Project Features Project features are shown on the Construction Drawings. L Dewatering If the project requires dewatering the Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining a Water Appropriation Permit from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Contractor will also be responsible for obtaining all other necessary permits and approvals, as well as all fees and documentation associated with the permits. J. Dates of Construction Summer 2016 to Winter 2017 IL Sequencing The activities that will reduce erosion and sedimentation and the general order they are to be completed, is as follows: I. Install temporary rock construction entrance. The stabilized construction site entrance shall be constructed prior to the start of construction. 2. Install inlet protection at locations as shown on the plans. Inlet protection shall be installed before any clearing and grading begins. 3. Clearing and grading will not occur in an area until it is necessary for construction to proceed. 4. Existing pavement and curb will be removed where specified in the plan. 5. Construct proposed storm sewer system and underground stormwater management system. 6. Erect building and construct parking lot. 7. Grade all grass areas to final grades and contours as shown in plan. 8. Install seed, mulch, and erosion control mat. 9. Remove temporary erosion control materials once construction has ceased. SWPPP Page 7 of 13 • 1 HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. L. General Information / Regulatory Requirements a. RATE CONTROL Rate control will be achieved through the underground stormwater management system and associated restrictor structure. The Chick-fil-A development will be required to limit peak runoff at or below existing conditions for the 2-year, 10-year-, 100-year, and 100-year 10-day snow melt storm events. Although the Chick-fil-A development is increasing the impervious loading, stormwater discharge rates in the proposed condition will be lower than existing rates. b. WATER QUALITY The Chick-fil-A site will required to treat stormwater runoff to remove 60% total phosphorus and 90% total suspended solids. The site has been designed to incorporate an underground stormwater management system that will promote filtration through the open graded aggregate layer and infiltration into the native soils. This site will utilize a vegetated swale at the south side of the property as well. The site controls have been modeled in WinSLAMM v10.0 to ensure that the required stormwater treatment has been met. c. INFILTRATION The Chick-fil-A site is required to provide a stormwater abstraction volume of 1.1 inches of runoff over all onsite impervious surfaces. This abstraction volume will be directed to the underground stormwater management system where it will be forced to infiltrate down through the native soils. Since the site is primarily made up of clayey soils with an infiltration rate of 0.06 inches per hour, the infiltration system has been designed with an approximate 17,100 square foot bed size to ensure the volume has a draw down time less than 48 hours. M. Identification of Potential Storm Water Contaminants The purpose of this section is to identify pollutants that could impact storm water during the parking lot and building constriction. The possible pollutants that could be present in the storm water are listed in the following table. SWPPP Page 8 of 13 HR Green, Inc. Table 2: Potential Stormwater Contaminants Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. Material Physical Storm Water Location to be Used Process for Description Pollutant(s) Containment Concrete White Solid Limestone, sand Curb and gutter Designated wash areas or complete removal from site Hydraulic Oil/ Fluids Brown oily Mineral oil Random leaks Oil absorbing petroleum diapers, trained personnel Gasoline Colorless Petroleum Hydrocarbon Machinery used in Oil absorbing benzene construction diapers, trained personnel Antifreeze Clear/ green/ Ethylene glycol, Machinery used in Trained personnel yellow propylene glycol construction Wastewater from Equipment Water, soil, oil and Not allowed within Construction washing grease project limits Cleaning Solvents Colorless, blue, or Perchlorethylene, No cleaning equipment Tarps yellow -green methylene chloride, in project limits, liquid trichloroethylene, Trained applicators for petroleum distillates concrete cleaning and prep work Temporary Fertilizer Liquid or solid Nitrogen, phosphorous, Rapid stabilization Managed grains potassium, chlorides areas, topsoil berms, application, stockpiles certified installers, quick cover plant materials Permanent Fertilizer Liquid or solid Nitrogen, phosphorous, Newly seeded areas Organic base, grains potassium, chlorides slow release forms only Erosion Solid Particles Soil, sediment Project limits Rapid stabilization measures SWPPP Page 9 of 13 HR Green, Inc. N. Potential Areas for Storm Water Contamination Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. The following potential areas were identified as possible storm water contamination areas: • Cleared and graded areas • Roadway construction areas • Construction site entrances O. Stormwater Control Best Management Practices a. TEMPORARY • Inlet filter baskets will be installed under the storm sewer grates. • Silt Fence will be installed around the perimeter of the project limits. b. PERMANENT • Permanent stormwater treatment will be provided via infiltration through the proposed on -site underground stormwater management system. P. Erosion Prevention Best Management Practices a. TEMPORARY • Inlet Protection will be placed at the existing storm structures identified in the Plans, by the Contractor prior to beginning grading at locations in which runoff could move offsite. • Stabilized construction entrances will be constructed to help reduce vehicle tracking of sediments. The paved street adjacent to the site entrance will be swept daily to remove any excess mud, dirt or rock tracked from the site with a pickup broom. • Erosion control blanket will be utilized to stabilize soil on steep slopes and at apron outlets where applicable. • Vegetation in areas not needed for construction shall be preserved. • All exposed soil areas must be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soil erosion but in no case later than 14 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. Temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic components (e.g., clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) and the constructed base components of roads, parking lots and similar surfaces are exempt from this requirement but must comply with Part IV.C.5 ofNPDES permit. • The normal wetted perimeter of any temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale that drains water from any portion of the construction site, or diverts water around the site, must be stabilized within 200 lineal feet from the property edge, or from the point of discharge into any surface water. Stabilization of the last 200 lineal feet must be completed within 24 hours after connecting to a surface water. • Temporary seed shall be Mn/DOT Seed Mix Type 150 or 190. Application rate of temporary seed shall be 40 Ibs/acre. Fertilizer shall be 24-12-24 (NPK) commercial grade analysis, applied at a rate of 300 lb/acre. • All storm sewer inlets shall be protected during construction using catch basin inlet barriers. Sediment shall be removed after each rainfall. • Construction sequencing will allow areas to be undisturbed until necessary for construction. SWPPP Page 10 of 13 HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. • Temporary and permanent seeding and/or planting areas will be inspected for bare spots and washouts. • A weekly written erosion control schedule will be required. It will discuss, among other items listed in the Construction Specification, how related work to offsite drainage will be incorporated into the weekly erosion plan schedule, how the SWPPP is functioning and any necessary changes that need to be discussed. • A maintenance inspection report will be completed by the Contractor and submitted to the Engineer for each inspection. b. PERMANENT • Permanent seeding and mulching and sod. • The smallest vegetated area possible will be disturbed during construction. t Q. Sediment Control Best Management Practices a. TEMPORARY • Silt fence • Dewatering related to the construction activity that may have turbid or sediment laden discharge water must be discharged to a temporary sedimentation basin on the project site whenever possible. If dewatering discharges cannot be directed toward an existing silt fence, hay bale structure, or ditch check area, filter bags should be used to contain and filter sediment from the dewatering discharge. • All erosion control measures shall he inspected at least once per week and within 24 hours of all storm events greater than 0.5 inches. All measures will be maintained in good working order. • Built up sediment shall be removed from inlet protection within 24 hours when it has reached 1/2 the height of the device. R. General Best Management Practices • All non -hazardous waste materials will be collected and stored in a secure dumpster or another approved containment method at the end of each day. • Partially used bags of fertilizer will be transferred to a sealable bin to prevent spills. • All vehicles left onsite will be monitored for leaks to reduce the chance of contamination. • Petroleum products will be stored in tightly sealed, properly labeled containers. An effort will be made to store only enough product required to complete the job. • Products will be kept in their original containers with the original manufacturer's label. Manufacturers' recommendations for proper use and disposal will be followed. • Materials and equipment necessary for spill cleanup will be kept in the temporary material storage trailer onsite. • All spills will be cleaned up immediately upon discovery. Spills large enough to reach the storm conveyance system will be reported to the DNR Emergency Response & Homeland Security Unit (Environmental Hazardous Conditions) 515-281-8694. • Concrete trucks shall wash out or discharge surplus concrete or water in the designated wash out area on site. SWPPP Page 11 of 13 HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. • The Contractor shall comply with applicable State and local waste disposal, sanitary sewer, or septic system regulations. In the event of a conflict with other government laws, rules and regulations, the more restrictive laws, rules or regulations shall govern. • If construction activities or design modifications are made to the site plan that could impact storm water, this SWPPP will be amended appropriately. The amended SWPPP will have a description of the new activities that contribute to the increased pollutant loading and the planned source control activities. • The Contractor shall designate individuals responsible for inspection, maintenance and repair activities, and filling out the inspection and maintenance reports. • The Contractor shall ensure that all BMPs are installed under the supervision of a certified SWPPP Inspector/Installer. • The Contractor shall designate an individual certified in SWPPP Site Management. The designated personnel shall be responsible for keeping the erosion and sediment controls used onsite in good working order. • An employee -training program will be developed and implemented to educate the prime contractor's employees about the requirements of the SWPPP. • All subcontractors, except the seeding and compost installer subcontractor, present on the job must have at least one member who can document certification in Construction Site Management. The seeding and compost installer contractor must submit documentation that at least one member of each team present on the job is certified as Inspector/Installer. S. Maintenance/Inspection Procedures: In addition to complying with the requirements of the NPDES II permit, the Erosion Control Supervisor shall complete the inspection and maintenance practices that will be used to maintain erosion and sediment controls as follows: 1. All control measures will be inspected at least once each week and following any storm event of 0.5 inches or greater. 2. All measures will be maintained in good working order; if a repair is necessary, it will be initiated within 24 hours of report. 3. Build up of sediment will be removed from inlet protection before it has reached one-half the height of the device. 4. Temporary and permanent seeding and mulch will be inspected for bare spots, washouts, and healthy growth. 5. Construction site vehicle exit locations must be inspected for evidence of off -site tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment must be removed from off -site paved surfaces within 24 hours of discovery. 6. A maintenance/inspection report will be written after each inspection. The report should include: a. Date and time of inspections b. Name of persons conducting inspections c. Findings of inspections, including recommendations for corrective actions d. Corrective actions taken since last inspection (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities) e. Date and amount of rainfall events since last inspection report f. Documentation of changes made to SWPPP SWPPP Page 12 of 13 HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. 7. The Erosion Control Supervisor will be responsible for inspection of all erosion control materials and writing the inspection and maintenance report. The Contractor and /or their sub -contractor will be responsible for all maintenance and repair activities deemed necessary by the Engineer or Erosion Control Supervisor. T. Pollution Prevention Management Measures: The following pollution prevention measures shall be implemented for: • Solid Waste: 1. Non -hazardous waste such as collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolition debris and other wastes shall be stockpiled at an approved location. 2. All non -hazardous waste shall be disposed of properly and in accordance with State recommended methods. • Hazardous Waste: 1. All hazardous waste such as oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances must be properly stored. Storage shall including secondary containment or other measures to prevent spills, leaks or other discharges. 2. Access to storage areas must be restricted to prevent vandalism. 3. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must comply with manufacturers' recommendations and the State requirements. • Construction Vehicle Washing: l . External washing of trucks and construction vehicles will be limited to a defined staging area. Runoff will be contained and properly disposed of. 2. Engine degreasing is not allowed on site. 3. Concrete trucks are to wash out or discharge surplus concrete or drum wash water within a designated location away from stormwater drains and waterways. U. Record Retention: Records will be retained on the job site and shall include: • Copy of SWPPP and any changes • Inspection and maintenance records • Permanent operation and maintenance agreements V. Notice of Discontinuation: The Owner or Contractor shall notify MPCA that discharge has been discontinued and that the discharge is no longer subject to the NPDES permitting requirements once final stabilization has been completed. The owner or contractor shall provide MPCA with a Notice of Discontinuation within 30 days of completion of the project which shall include: name of the owner or operator to which coverage under the general permit was issued, permit number and the permit authorization number, the date the construction site reached final stabilization, and a signed certificate. The notice shall be mailed to the Storm Water Coordinator at the MPCA. SWPPP Page 13 of 13 Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT TEMPLATE SWPPP Appendices HR Green, Inc. CHICK-FIL-A CHANHASSEN, MN Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT TO BE COMPLETED EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAINFALL EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR MORE INSPECTOR: DATE: DAYS SINCE LAST RAINFALL: AMOUNT OF LAST RAINFALL STABILIZATION MEASURES AREA DATE SINCE LAST DISTURBED DATE OF NEXT DISTURBANCE STABILIZED? (yESNO) STABILIZED WITH CONDITION STABILIZATION REQUIRED: TO BE PERFORMED BY: ON OR BEFORE: SWPPP Appendices HR Green, Inc. CHICK-FIL-A CHANHASSEN, MN Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT CHANGES REQUIRED TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: ' REASONS FOR CHANGES: TO BE PERFORMED BY: ON OR BEFORE: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Signed: Date: SWPPP Appendices HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen. MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. APPENDIX B CONTRACTOR DECLARATION SWPPP Appendices HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fl-A, Inc. POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN DECLARATION OWNER'S CERTIFICATION I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Date: Signed: CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I declare under penalty of law that I understand the terms and conditions of the general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit that authorizes the stone water discharges associated with construction activity from the construction site identified as part of this declaration. Dated: Signed: Dated: Signed: Dated: Signed: Dated: Signed: Dated: Signed: Dated: Signed: SWPPP Appendices HR Green, Inc. OTHER APPENDICES C. GRADING PLAN D. EROSION CONTROL PLAN E. NRCS SOIL MAPS Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. SWPPP Appendices HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. APPENDIX C GRADING PLAN SWPPP Appendices a.wim .~ gs?T�i'i .' uir `• 1""� u�is. �•..c .w s w � iaaa r v miia�m :�"'m.mM�m �... TRKFlC CONTROL NOTES: FGFN M_m mmmr 0 0.. WEST 19TH SMEEf STATE MUNN HIGHWAY NO. 5 ww[ mm mn-s-wr LZ n TRASH ENCL SURE GRADING DETAIL y ssss uuc r-ia• ••. "' IT- ... N 79M N.. rsu HR Green, Inc. Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. APPENDIX D EROSION CONTROL PLAN SWPPP Appendices NOTES, om..c � .s.....bnb...ww.�in HH ..`.. w"�' �a.� nbiuw�s b�awi�wY�p w. ------------------ STATE TINNH HIGHWAY NO. S fne.uin wwA.[^ NbwO wncw.rto �+mrtn caun[mmnrt/�a�yi/�r� HR Green, Inc. APPENDIX E NRCS SOIL MAPS Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Chick-fil-A, Inc. SWPPP Appendices USDA United States A product of the National Department of Cooperative Soil Survey, Agriculture a joint effort of the United n I n�� States Department of \VI K Agriculture and other Federal agencies. State Natural agencies including the Resources Agricultural Experiment Conservation Stations, and local Service participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Carver County, Minnesota March 17, 2016 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 1 n n 0.'SL964 OSSL964 pOSL964 069LL4 CBbL964 OL6L964 03bL964 tY,bL964 ObbLRib CEbL964 CY4L9ib OibL964 M.LE.tE oE6 M.f6 LE d6 ..Is tE a . co m $ <gg S z Q M. t d6 MAPLEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons • • Soil Map Unit Lines 13 Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features V Blowout Borrow Pit X Clay Spot .,� Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill A. Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry ® Miscellaneous Water Q Perennial Water Rock Outcrop + Saline Spot Sandy Spot ..r Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Custom Soil Resource Report Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation flails •.s Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background . Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12.000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: hftp:/Iwebsoilsuwey.nres.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Carver County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 12, Sep 18, 2015 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 orlarger. Dates) aerial images were photographed: Aug 26, 2014—Sep 7, 2014 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Carver County, Minnesota (MN019) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI CO Cordova day loam, 0 to 2 0.3 20.2% percent slopes GL Glencoe day loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 0.0 2.5% 35.0% 42.3% 1B I0lkenny-Lester loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes 0.5 Ls Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 0.5 TOWS for Area of Interest 1.3 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic 10 Custom Soil Resource Report classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however. onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope. stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example. Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes.. associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha - Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 11 Custom Soil Resource Report Carver County, Minnesota CO —Cordova clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2vvdk Elevation: 690 to 1,840 feet Mean annual precipitation: 24 to 37 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 140 to 180 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Cordova and similar soils., 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Cordova Setting Landform: Ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Fine -loamy till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 10 inches: clay loam A - 10 to 18 inches: clay loam Btg - 18 to 38 inches: clay loam Cg - 38 to 79 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 8 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 20 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available waterstorage in profile: High (about 11.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Minor Components Le sueur Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Ground moraines. hillslopes 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, talf Down -slope shape: Convex, linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XSOO6MN) Glencoe Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions Down -slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Ecological site: Pothole Marsh (R103XY002MN) Other vegetative classification: Ponded If Not Drained (G103XS013MN) GL—Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 2tsjr Elevation: 690 to 1,840 feet Mean annual precipitation: 24 to 37 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 140 to 180 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Glencoe and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Glencoe Setting Landform: Depressions Down -slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Parent material: Local alluvium over loamy till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: clay loam A - 9 to 39 inches: clay loam Bg - 39 to 50 inches: clay loam Cg - 50 to 79 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Very poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to high (0.06 to 2.00 inthr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 6 inches Frequency of flooding: None Custom Soil Resource Report Frequency of ponding. Occasional Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 20 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: CID Ecological site: Pothole Marsh (RI03XY002MN) Other vegetative classification: Ponded If Not Drained (G103XS013MN) Minor Components Okoboji Percent of map unit. 10 percent Landform: Depressions Down -slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Ecological site: Pothole Marsh (R103XY002MN) Other vegetative classification: Ponded If Not Drained (G1 03XS01 3MN) Webster Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Loamy Wet Prairie (R103XY001 MN) Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XSOOIMN) Canisteo Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Ground moraines, rims on depressions Landform position (three-dimensional): Tall Down -slope shape: Linear, concave Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Loamy Wet Prairie (R103XY001 MN) Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Calcareous (G103XS009MN) KB —Kilkenny -Lester loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: f9jl Elevation: 700 to 1,600 feet Mean annual precipitation: 23 to 35 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 50 degrees F Frost -free period: 155 to 200 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland 14 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Composition Kilkenny and similar soils: 60 percent Lester and similar soils: 40 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transacts of the mapunit. Description of Kilkenny Setting Landform: Moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 11 inches: loam Bt - 11 to 35 inches: clay loam 28k,2C - 35 to 80 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 6 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.60 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 20 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 20 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Description of Lester Setting Landform: Moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material. Till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loam Bt - 8 to 35 inches: clay loam BC - 35 to 40 inches: clay loam C - 40 to 60 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained 15 Custom Soil Resource Report Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 inthr) Depth to water table: About 43 to 47 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 20 percent Gypsum, maximum in profile: 1 percent Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) LS—Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 2vvdg Elevation: 690 to 1,840 feet Mean annual precipitation: 24 to 37 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 140 to 180 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Le sueur and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transacts of the mapunit. Description of Le Sueur Setting Landform: Ground moraines, hillslopes Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landfonn position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, tall Down -slope shape: Convex, linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Fine-loamytill Typical profile Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loam A - 8 to 14 inches: loam Btg - 14 to 52 inches: clay loam Cg - 52 to 79 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained 16 Custom Soil Resource Report Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderatety high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 12 to 24 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 20 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1 Hydrologic Soil Group: CID Othervegetative classifcation: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Minor Components Cordova Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down -slope shape: Concave, linear Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001 MN) Lester Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Acid (G103XS006MN) Webster Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down -slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Ecological site: Loamy Wet Prairie (R103XY001MN) Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001 MN) 17 DRAFT Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen FSU 445-463 West 791h Street Chanhassen, Minnesota lilY�� rEC p EAS6U MAID 1 b 2U16 CHAMH� SSEid PLH�INhiu �Ft'Y Prepared for: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Atlanta, Georgia February 3, 2016 Giles Project No. 1G-1601002 I hereby certify that Ibis plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Print Name: Signature: Date: License# SCANNED GILES ENGINEERING I)SSOCIATES. INC. GILES ENGINEERING DISSOCIATES, INC. • Atlanta, GA GEOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONSULTANTS • Baltimore, MD • Dallas, Tx • Los Angeles. CA Manassas. VA February 3, 2016 • Milwaukee, WI Chick-fil-A, Inc. 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta. GA 30349 Attention: Ms. Candy Nooks Restaurant Development Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen FSU 445-463 West 791 Street Chanhassen, Minnesota Project No. 1 G-1601002 (DRAFT) Dear Ms. Nooks: As requested, Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. conducted a Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis for the proposed project. The accompanying report describes the services that were conducted, and it provides geotechnical-related findings, conclusions, and recommendations that were derived from those services. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical consulting services for the proposed project. Please contact the undersigned if there are questions concerning the report, or if we may be of further service. Very truly yours, GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Benjamin M. Stark, EIT Staff Professional Anthony C. Giles, P.E. Vice President Distribution: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Attn: Ms. Candy Nooks (1 via email: candy. nooksaa chick-fil-a.com) Attn: Mr. Jason Hill (1 via email: iason.hill(a)chick-fil-a.com) Chick-fil-A, Inc. Real Estate Legal Department Attn: Ms. Brittany Berube (1 via USPS) N8 W22350 Johnson Drive • Suite At • Waukesha, WI 53186 2621544-0118 • Fax 262/549-5868 • E-Mail rnikwauke@gilesengr.c TABLE OF CONTENTS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EXPLORATION AND ANALYSIS PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU 445-463 WEST 79TH STREET CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA GILES PROJECT NO. 1G-1601002 Section No. Description Page No EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES.................................................................................................. 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................. 2 5.0 GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY SERVICES............................................................... 3 6.0 MATERIAL CONDITIONS.............................................................................................. 3 6.1 Surface Materials................................................................................................ 3 6.2 Fill Material......................................................................................................... 4 6.3 Native Soil........................................................................................................... 4 7.0 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS...................................................................................4 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................... 4 8.1 Site Development Considerations....................................................................... 5 8.2 Seismic Design Considerations........................................................................... 5 8.3 Grease Trap Considerations.........................................I ...........................5 8.4 Building Foundation Recommendations.............................................................. 5 8.5 Floor Slab Recommendations............................................................................. 7 8.6 New Pavement Recommendations..................................................................... 8 8.7 General Site Preparation Recommendations.....................................................11 8.8 Generalized Construction Considerations..........................................................13 8.9 Recommended Construction Materials Testing Services...................................14 9.0 BASIS OF REPORT......................................................................................................15 APPENDICES Appendix A — Figures (1) and Test Boring Logs (7) Appendix B - Field Procedures Appendix C - Laboratory Testing and Classification Appendix D - General Information and Important Information about Your Geotechnical Report Red —This site has been given a "Red" designation, from a geotechnical perspective, because subgrade improvement will likely be necessary in floor slab and pavement areas due to soil with lower strengths and/or higher moisture contents, and possibly also due to perched groundwater. Also, over -excavation might be needed for foundations. It is recommended that a geotechnical engineer provide specific recommendations regarding subgrade improvement and over -excavation during construction, based on observation and testing. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EXPLORATION AND ANALYSIS PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU 445-463 WEST 79TH STREET CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA GILES PROJECT NO. 1G-1601002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Executive Summary provides limited geotechnical information regarding the proposed project. Since this Executive Summary is exceedingly abbreviated, it must be read in complete context with the following report ('Report"). Red — This site has been given a "Red" designation, from a geotechnical perspective, because subgrade improvement will likely be necessary in floor slab and pavement areas due to soil with lower strengths and/or higher moisture contents, and possibly also due to perched groundwater. Also, over -excavation might be needed for foundations. It is recommended that a geotechnical engineer provide specific recommendations regarding subgrade improvement and over -excavation during construction, based on observation and testing. Subsurface Conditions • Seven geotechnical test borings were conducted at the site. Topsoil or Asphalt -concrete pavement (with an aggregate base course) was at the ground surface at the test borings. Materials classified as fill were beneath the surface materials at most test borings, and were present to about 2 feet below -grade. The fill materials generally consisted of sandy gravel, except that silty sand and gravel was at one test boring. At two test borings, the fill included asphalt -concrete rubble. Native soil was below the surface materials and existing fill, and was present to the test boring termination depths. In general, native soil consisted of medium stiff to very stiff clay with variable amounts of silt, sand, and gravel. The native soils had relatively high moisture contents. • It is estimated that the water table was about 10 to 15 feet below -ground at the test boring locations, when the test borings were conducted; however, the site is likely subject to shallow, perched groundwater conditions. Perched groundwater is expected to be variable in terms of area and depth, and could be significant. Foundations • A spread -footing foundation is recommended for the proposed building. It is recommended that footings bear directly on suitable native soil that has been evaluated and approved by a geotechnical engineer. Existing fill is unsuitable for direct or indirect support of foundations. Foundations are recommended to be designed using a 2,000 pound per square foot (psf) maximum, net, allowable soil bearing capacity. Suitable bearing native soils were encountered at, or near, the assumed foundation -bearing elevations (given in the Report) at the test boring locations, but subsurface conditions could vary between test borings. Some over -excavation will likely be necessary for foundation construction, especially due to low -strength native soil, and also due to existing fill associated with the current and former site developments. WGILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Continued) Giles Project No. 1G-1601002 Floor Slab • A ground -bearing floor slab is suitable for the proposed building, assuming that the floor - slab subgrade will be prepared in accordance with the Report. • The floor slab is recommended to be at least 4 inches thick. A 10-mil vapor retarder and a minimum 4-inch-thick aggregate base course are recommended to be below the floor slab. Parking Lot • Considering that the site is subject to shallow, perched groundwater, a sub -base consisting of free -draining, open -graded aggregate is recommended to be below the dense -graded aggregate base course; the sub -base is intended for drainage. The sub- base is recommended to be at least 4 inches thick, but the actual thickness should be determined based on the subgrade conditions during construction. Site Development Considerations • Based on the soil that was encountered at the test borings, and considering that the site is likely subject to perched groundwater, it is expected that unstable soil will be encountered during subgrade preparation. On a preliminary basis, unsuitable soil could be replaced with engineered fill, or it could be scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted. Specific recommendations for subgrade improvement should be provided by a geotechnical engineer during construction. • Because the site is likely subject to shallow, perched groundwater, buried tanks for grease storage (grease traps) might need to be ballasted or anchored to resist buoyant uplift. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EXPLORATION AND ANALYSIS PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU 445-463 WEST 79TH STREET CHANHASSEN,MINNESOTA GILES PROJECT NO. 1G-1601002 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES This report provides the results of the Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis that Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. ("Giles") conducted for the proposed development. The Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis included a Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Program, Geotechnical Laboratory Services, and Geotechnical Engineering Services. The scope of each service area was narrow and limited, as directed by our client and based on our understanding and assumptions about the proposed project. Service areas are briefly described later. Geotechnical-related recommendations are provided in this report for design and construction of the foundation and floor slab for the proposed Chick-fil-A building. Geotechnical-related recommendations are also provided for new parking -lot pavement. Site preparation recommendations are given, but are only preliminary because the means and methods of site preparation will depend on factors that were unknown when this report was prepared. Those factors include, but are not limited to, the weather before and during construction, subsurface conditions that are exposed during construction, and final details of the proposed development. Giles is conducting a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and an Asbestos Identification Survey regarding the subject site. Results of those services will be provided in separate reports (Giles Project No. 1E-1501002). 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is along the south side of West 791h Street, north of Arboretum Boulevard and west of Great Plains Boulevard, in Chanhassen, Minnesota. It is understood that the site address is 445-463 West 79'^ Street. When the test borings (described later) were performed, the western portion of the site was occupied by an asphalt -concrete parking lot that appeared to be in poor to fair condition. The eastern portion of the site contained a single -story masonry structure that housed several retail businesses. The building was reported to not have a basement. Southeast of the existing building, along Arboretum Boulevard, the site was covered with grass and contained a few trees. The site was relatively flat. Ground elevations at the test borings ranged between El. 99.2 and El. 101.02; those elevations are referenced to Giles' adopted benchmark shown on the Test Boring Location Plan, Figure 1, in Appendix A. Based on a cursory review of aerial photographs, the site was previously developed and included a former structure. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1 G-1601002 Page 2 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Chick-fil-A restaurant will be a single -story, stud -frame structure with a brick exterior and a truss roof system. It will not have a basement or other below -grade spaces. Exterior bearing walls and interior columns will support the building. Maximum foundation loads from walls and columns are assumed to be 3,000 pounds per lineal foot (plf) and 40,000 pounds, respectively. The floor is planned to be a ground -bearing concrete slab, with an assumed maximum live load of 100 pounds per square foot (psf). Chick-fil-A's parking lot will include parking stalls, drive lanes, and drive-thru lanes. Traffic will consist of passenger vehicles, except for occasional truck traffic due to deliveries and trash removal. For the Midwest region, Chick-fil-A's minimum flexible pavement section consists of a 4-inch-thick layer of hot -mix asphalt (HMA) over an 8-inch-thick aggregate base course. Chick- fil-A's minimum concrete pavement section consists of a 5-inch-thick layer of Portland cement concrete (PCC). However, for the drive-thru lane and dumpster stalls, the minimum concrete section consists of a 6-inch-thick PCC slab. The proposed floor elevation and pavement grades were not provided to Giles; therefore, to complete this report it was necessary for Giles to assume those elevations. This report assumes that the floor of the Chick-fil-A building will be at El. 101 referenced to Giles' adopted benchmark shown on the Test Boring Location Plan. This report also assumes that pavement grades will be between El. 99 and El. 101, and will generally follow the site's current topography. Based on the assumed floor and pavement elevations, and considering the current topography, less than one foot of grade change is expected for site development. 4.0 GEOTECHNICAL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION PROGRAM To evaluate subsurface conditions, seven geotechnical test borings were conducted at the site using a mechanical drill -rig. Because the existing building covered a significant portion of Chick- fil-A's proposed building footprint, locations for the test borings were restricted. Test Boring Nos. 1 through 4 were 16 feet deep and were in Chick-fil-A's proposed building area, but Test Boring Nos. 3 and 4 were offset outside the proposed footprint due to the existing building. Test Boring Nos. 5, 6, and 7 were 6 feet deep and were in Chick-fil-A's proposed parking lot area. Test boring locations were positioned on -site relative to the existing building, and by estimating right angles. Approximate locations of the test borings are shown on the Test Boring Location Plan. Samples were collected from each test boring, at certain depths, using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT), conducted using the drill rig. A brief description of the SPT is given in Appendix B, along with descriptions of other field procedures. Immediately after sampling, select portions of the SPT samples were placed in containers that were labeled at the site for identification. Retained samples were transported to Giles' geotechnical laboratory. WGILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1G-1601002 Page 3 Ground elevations at the test borings were estimated based on Giles' adopted benchmark shown on the Test Boring Location Plan, and are noted on the Test Boring Logs (in Appendix A), which are records of the test borings. Test boring elevations are considered accurate within approximately one foot The boreholes were backfilled; however, settlement and/or expansion of backfill materials will likely occur, possibly creating a hazard that can lead to a threat of injury to people and animals. Borehole areas should, therefore, be carefully and routinely monitored by the property owner; settlement and/or expansion of backfill materials should be repaired immediately. Giles will not monitor or repair boreholes. 5.0 GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY SERVICES Retained samples were classified using the descriptive terms and particle -size criteria shown on the General Notes in Appendix D, and by using the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2488-75) as a general guide. Classifications are shown on the Test Boring Logs along with horizontal lines that show estimated depths of material change. Field -related information pertaining to the test borings is also on the Test Boring Logs. For simplicity and abbreviation, terms and symbols are used on the Test Boring Logs, the terms and symbols are defined on the General Notes. Unconfined compression, calibrated penetrometer resistance, and moisture content tests were performed on select cohesive soil samples to evaluate their general engineering properties. The test results are on the Test Boring Logs. Laboratory procedures are briefly described in Appendix C. Because the tests were conducted on SPT samples, results of the strength -related tests (unconfined compression and penetration resistance) are considered to be approximations and were, therefore, used as supplemental information. The retained samples were screened with a Photoionization Detector (PID) to check for Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) vapors, such as vapors associated with gasoline. Results of the PID screening are on the Test Boring Logs. 6.0 MATERIAL CONDITIONS Because material sampling at the test borings was discontinuous, it was necessary for Giles to estimate conditions between sample intervals. Estimated conditions at the test borings are briefly discussed in this section and are described in more detail on the Test Boring Logs. Giles' conclusions and recommendations are based on the estimated conditions. 6.1 Surface Materials About 6 and 9 inches of topsoil was at the ground surface at Test Boring Nos. 1 and 2, respectively, conducted in Chick-fil-A's proposed building area. Asphalt -concrete pavement that GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1G-1601002 Page 4 was about 4 to 6 inches thick was at the ground surface at Test Boring Nos. 3 through 7. About 6 to 8 inches of aggregate base -course materials were beneath the asphalt pavement. 6.2 Fill Material Materials classified as fill were beneath the surface materials at Test Boring Nos. 3 through 7, and were present to about 2 feet below -grade. The fill materials generally consisted of sandy gravel, except that silty sand and gravel was encountered at Test Boring No. 7. The fill at Test Boring Nos. 5 and 6 included asphalt -concrete rubble. 6.3 Native Soil Native soil was below the surface materials and existing fill, and was present to the test boring termination depths. In general, native soil consisted of clay with variable amounts of silt, sand, and gravel. Based on visual -manual classification, and considering the results of strength -related laboratory testing, the native soils exhibited a medium stiff to very stiff comparative consistency. Also, the native soils had relatively high moisture contents. 7.0 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS It is estimated that the water table was about 10 to 15 feet below -ground at the test boring locations, when the test borings were conducted; however, the site is likely subject to shallow, perched groundwater conditions. Perched groundwater is expected to be variable in terms of area and depth, and could be significant. The groundwater conditions discussed above were estimated based on the colors and moisture conditions of the soil samples recovered from the test borings. The actual groundwater conditions might differ and the water table might be higher than estimated. If a precise determination of the groundwater conditions at the site is needed, groundwater observation wells could be installed and monitored; however, considering that only minor grade changes are expected, as discussed Section 3.0, observation wells are not expected to be necessary. 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Red — This site has been given a "Red" designation, from a geotechnical perspective, because subgrade improvement will likely be necessary in floor slab and pavement areas due to soil with lower strengths and/or higher moisture contents, and possibly also due to perched groundwater. Also, over -excavation might be needed for foundations. It is recommended that a geotechnical engineer provide specific recommendations regarding subgrade improvement and over -excavation during construction, based on observation and testing. V0114 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1G-1601002 Page 5 8.1 Site Development Considerations In general, the retained soil samples are sensitive to moisture and disturbance, and some had relatively low strengths and high moisture contents. Furthermore, the site is likely subject to shallow, perched groundwater conditions. Due to the textural and strength characteristics of the retained soil samples, and the shallow groundwater, subgrade improvement (such as over - excavation, mechanical stabilization, etc.) will likely be necessary. Areas requiring improvement should be defined during construction with the assistance of a geotechnical engineer. Also, specific improvement methods should be determined during construction on an area -by -area basis, depending on the site conditions and results of proof -rolling (described later). Where subgrade improvement is needed, it might be necessary/beneficial to construct "test strips" to determine the most cost-effective and appropriate means of developing a suitable subgrade. Site preparation recommendations are given later. 8.2 Seismic Design Considerations A soil Site Class C is recommended for seismic design. By definition, Site Class is based on the average properties of subsurface materials to 100 feet below the ground surface. Since 100-foot test borings were not requested or authorized, it was necessary to estimate Site Class based on the test borings, presumed area geology, and the International Building Code. A higher Site Class might be possible, but would require performing at least one 100-foot test boring at the site. 8.3 Grease Trap Considerations It is estimated that the water table was about 10 to 15 feet below -grade at the test boring locations, when the test borings were conducted. However, the site is likely subject to shallow, perched groundwater. Buried tanks for grease storage (grease traps) might, therefore, need to be ballasted or anchored to resist buoyant uplift. 8.4 Building Foundation Recommendations Based on the assumed floor elevation (El. 101 referenced to Giles' adopted benchmark), a spread -footing foundation is recommended for the proposed building. It is recommended that footings bear directly on suitable native soil that has been evaluated and approved by a geotechnical engineer. Existing fill is unsuitable for direct or indirect support of foundations. Foundations are recommended to be designed using a 2,000 psf maximum, net, allowable soil bearing capacity. For geotechnical considerations, strip footings are recommended to be at least 16 inches wide and isolated footings are recommended to be at least 24 inches wide, regardless of the calculated foundation -bearing stress. Foundation walls could be constructed of cast -in - place concrete or concrete masonry units. It is recommended and assumed that a structural engineer will provide specific foundation details including footing dimensions, reinforcing, and other details. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1G-1601002 Page 6 It is understood that a minimum 42-inch foundation depth is required for frost protection. Footings for perimeter walls are, therefore, recommended to be at least 42 inches below the finished ground -grade adjacent to the building, or to a depth required by the local building code. Interior footings could be directly below the floor slab, since the building will be heated and it is assumed that support soil will not freeze. The foundation analysis was conducted assuming the planned bearing grade of perimeter and interior foundations will be approximately 4 feet and 1'/z feet below the floor surface, respectively. Using the assumed floor elevation (El. 101), and the assumed foundation -bearing depths given above, it is assumed that perimeter and interior footings will bear at El. 97 and El. 99.5, respectively, referenced to Giles' adopted benchmark shown on the Test Boring Location Plan. Suitable bearing native soils were encountered at, or near, the assumed foundation -bearing elevations at the test boring locations, but subsurface conditions could vary between test borings. Some over -excavation will likely be necessary for foundation construction, especially due to low - strength native soil, and also due to existing fill associated with the current and former site developments. Where feasible, foundation excavations are recommended to be made with a smooth -edge backhoe bucket to develop a relatively undisturbed bearing grade. A toothed bucket will likely disturb foundation -bearing soil more than a smooth -edge bucket, thereby making materials at the excavation base more susceptible to saturation and instability, especially during adverse weather. Contractors must protect foundation support soil and foundation construction materials (concrete, reinforcing, etc.). In addition, engineered fill is recommended to be placed and compacted in excavations, benched as needed, along foundation walls immediately after the foundation walls are capable of supporting lateral pressures from backfill, compaction, and compaction equipment. Earth -formed footing construction techniques will likely be feasible considering the cohesive soil that was encountered at the test borings. Foundation Support Soil Requirements Based on the recommended 2,000 psf bearing capacity, the unconfined compressive strength of native cohesive (clayey) foundation support -soil is recommended'to be at least 1.0 ton per square foot (tsf). It is further recommended that the strength characteristics of soil within the entire foundation influence zone (determined by a geotechnical engineer during construction) meet or exceed the recommended value, unless Giles approves lesser values. As described above, suitable -bearing native soil was at, or near, the assumed foundation -bearing elevation at the building -area test borings, but some over -excavation of low -strength native soil and existing fill should be expected. A geotechnical engineer must evaluate (and approve) foundation support -soil during foundation excavation and immediately before foundation construction. The purpose of the recommended evaluation is to confirm that the foundation will be properly supported; to determine over- WGILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1G-1601002 Page 7 excavation depths and widths (if any), and to confirm that the support soils are similar to those described herein and reported on the Test Boring Logs. If another firm performs the recommended evaluation, they should use appropriate means and methods and Giles must be notified if the composition or strength characteristics of foundation support materials differ from those shown on the Test Boring Logs, allowing us the opportunity to revise this report. Without evaluation and approval of foundation support materials by a geotechnical engineer, the foundation could be improperly supported, possibly resulting in excessive settlement of the proposed structure. Unsuitable materials beneath the foundation areas could be replaced with engineered fill, such as well -graded aggregate that has lower water -sensitivity. If engineered fill is used as backfill, lateral over -excavation of the unsuitable materials will also be required. Extreme care should be exercised when using vibratory equipment to compact engineered fill, especially within footing excavations. Due to perched groundwater, use of vibratory compaction equipment within footing excavations could cause soil to become unstable, possibly resulting in support and settlement Problems. Static (non -vibratory) compaction equipment should be used. To avoid problems associated with the use of vibratory compaction equipment, unsuitable materials could be replaced with lean Portland cement concrete (minimum 28-day compressive strength of 500 psi). Footing pads could also be stepped or thickened to extend through unsuitable bearing materials and isolated column pads could be uniformly thickened or extended. It is recommended that a structural engineer provide specific details of stepped or thickened footings. Estimated Foundation Settlement The post -construction total and differential settlements of a spread -footing foundation designed and constructed based on this report are estimated to be less than about 1 inch and 0.5 inch, respectively. The post -construction angular distortion is estimated to be less than about 0.002 inch per inch across a distance of 20 feet or more. Estimated settlements are based on the assumption that foundation support soil will be tested and approved by a geotechnical engineer during construction. 8.5 Floor Slab Recommendations With proper subgrade preparation, a ground -bearing concrete floor slab is considered suitable for the proposed building. However, because of the current and former site developments, and the low -strength native soil, floor slab support materials must be thoroughly tested and evaluated by a geotechnical engineer during construction. Assuming a maximum 100 psf floor load, the floor slab is recommended to be at least 4 inches thick; that recommended thickness assumes that the 28-day compressive strength concrete will be at least 3,500 pounds per square inch (psi). The floor slab is recommended to be reinforced. It is recommended and assumed that a structural engineer will specify the floor slab thickness, reinforcing, joint details and other parameters. EN GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1 G-1601002 Page 8 A minimum 4-inch-thick base course is recommended to be directly below the floor slab to serve as a capillary break and for uniformity. It is recommended that the base course consist of free - draining aggregate. Also, it is recommended that a geotechnical engineer test and approve base course aggregate before it is placed. Depending on aggregate gradation, a geotextile might need to be below the base course. For moisture control, a minimum 10-mil vapor retarder is recommended to be directly below the base course throughout the entire floor area. The vapor retarder is recommended to be in accordance with ASTM E 1745-97, entitled: Standard Specification for Plastic Water Vapor Retarders Used in Contact with Soil or Granular Fill under Concrete Slabs. If the base course has sharp, angular aggregate, protecting the retarder with a geotextile (or by other means) is recommended. Estimated Floor Slab Settlement The post -construction total and differential settlements of an isolated floor slab constructed in accordance with this report are estimated to be less than about 0.5 inch and 0.3 inch, respectively, over a distance of about 20 feet. Estimated settlements are based on the assumption that the floor slab subgrade will be thoroughly tested by a geotechnical engineer during and immediately before floor slab construction. 8.6 New Pavement Recommendations Based on information provided by Chick-fil-A, it is understood that the typical traffic at Chick-fil-A sites consist of 3 large tractor -trailer trucks per week and 4 general delivery trucks per day. Therefore, the pavement recommendations given below are based on an estimated maximum daily traffic volume consisting of four 18,000-pound equivalent single -axle loads (ESALs). It is recommended that the project owner, developer, civil engineer and other design professionals involved with the project confirm that the traffic volume is appropriate. If requested, Giles will provide supplemental pavement recommendations based on other traffic conditions. Hot -Mix Asphalt Pavement A California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test is commonly used to determine soil support parameters for pavement design. Since a CBR test or other test was not authorized for this project, it was necessary for Giles to assume the CBR design value used to give pavement recommendations. The following pavement sections are based on a silty clay subgrade and an assumed CBR design value of 3. Engineered fill that is placed in proposed pavement areas is recommended to have a CBR value equal to or greater than 3. Considering that the site is subject to shallow perched groundwater, a sub -base consisting of free - draining, open -graded aggregate is recommended to be below the dense -graded aggregate base course; the sub -base is intended for drainage. A geotextile is recommended to be directly below MON GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1 G-1601002 Page 9 the sub -base to serve as a separator; the geotextile is recommended to be installed on a properly prepared subgrade in accordance with the geotextile manufacturer's recommendations. Minnesota Department of Transportation specifications are shown on the table so that proper materials are specified and used. The pavement section in the following table is based on the traffic volumes presented above. If the pavement is subject to a greater amount of traffic, increased pavement maintenance and premature pavement failure should be expected. Local codes may require specific testing to determine soil support characteristics and/or minimum pavement section thickness. The pavement section shown below is for both parking stalls and drives. TABLE 1 RECOMMENDED ASPHALT -CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION Material Minimum Section Minnesota DOT Thickness Inches Standard Specifications Hot Mix Asphalt Section 2360 Surface Course 1Yz Hot Mix Asphalt 2,�� Section 2360 Binder Course Dense -Graded Aggregate Section 3138 Base Course 4 CL-5 or CL-6 Open -Graded Aggregate Section 3136 Sub -Base 4 Open -Graded Base Geotextile Fabric Mirafi® 150N Section 3733 or similar geotextile approved b Giles • Install geotextile in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations • Depending on the subgrade conditions at the time of construction, the sub -base might need to be thicker than recommended. Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Alternate The typical Chick-fl-A Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement section is considered suitable for the standard duty areas of the site; however, the base course, sub -base, and geotextile shown in Table 1 are recommended to be below the Portland cement concrete pavement. High Stress Area Pavement Chick-fil-A's standard 6-inch-thick PCC pavement section is considered suitable in high -stress areas such as at the drive-thru lanes, entrance/exit aprons, at the trash enclosure, and in areas where trucks will turn or will be parked. The trash enclosure slab should include No. 3 reinforcing bars at 12 inches on -center, each way. The drive-thru lane PCC pavement should include at least 6x6, W1.4xW1.4 gauge Welded Wire Fabric (WWF) reinforcement. The base course, sub -base, and geotextile shown in Table 1 are recommended to be below the PCC pavement. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1G-1601002 Page 10 General Portland Cement Concrete Recommendations Concrete should have a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 4,000 psi with 4 to 7 percent air entrainment. Control joint spacing should be determined in accordance with the current ACI code. Expansion joints should be provided where pavement abuts fixed objects, such as the buildings and light poles. Materials and construction procedures for concrete pavement and aggregate base course are recommended to be in accordance with the Minnesota DOT Standard Specifications Section 2301 and 2211, respectively Pavement Drainage Considerations Because the site is subject to shallow perched -groundwater, an under -pavement drain system is recommended to be below all pavement areas to remove water. Even with the recommended drainage system, maintenance and repair of the pavement might be necessary. The service life of the pavement could be reduced because of perched groundwater. Pavement damage and other problems should be expected due to frost -heave. Frost -heave could be significant, especially if the parking lot is not equipped with an under -pavement drainage system. In general, it is recommended that the under -pavement drainage system consist of the open - graded sub -base and geotextile fabric shown in Table 1. Also, the pavement subgrade is recommended to be contoured and pitched to direct water to catch basins. Weep holes are recommended to be installed in the catch basins as specified by the project civil engineer. The sub -base must be hydraulically connected to the weep holes, thereby allowing water to freely drain into the weep holes. It is recommended that a civil engineer design the pavement drainage system based on the finalized site grades and details of the site, and in consideration of local and state codes. While the primary purpose of the drainage system is to collect groundwater from pavement areas, the drainage system is recommended to be configured to collect (intercept) water at the perimeter of the building area and from beneath sidewalks. General Pavement Considerations The pavement recommendations assume that the pavement subgrade will be prepared in accordance with this report, the base course and sub -base will be properly drained, and a geotechnical engineer will observe and test pavement construction. The pavement was designed based on AASHTO design parameters for a twenty-year design period. Pavement maintenance along with a major rehabilitation after about 8 to 10 years should be expected. Additional pavement maintenance and repair should be expected due to the existing fill, due to lower strength native soil, and because the site is subject to shallow perched groundwater. Local codes may require specific testing to determine soil support characteristics and/or minimum pavement section thickness might be required. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1 G-1601002 Page 11 8.7 General Site Preparation Recommendations This section deals with site preparation, including preparation of floor slab, pavement, and engineered fill areas. The means and methods of site preparation will greatly depend on the weather conditions before and during construction, the subsurface conditions that are exposed during earthwork operations, and the final details of the proposed development. Therefore, only generalized site preparation recommendations are given. In addition to being general, the following site preparation recommendations are abbreviated; the Guide Specifications in Appendix D gives further recommendations. The Guide Specifications should be read along with this section. Also, the Guide Specifications are recommended to be used as an aid to develop the project specifications. Demolition and Removal Site preparation will require complete removal and proper disposal of the existing building, including all foundations, floor slabs, underground utilities that are not reused, etc. Site preparation will also require complete removal and proper disposal of any below -grade remnants of the building that formerly occupied the site. Disposal of rubble and debris should be in accordance with local, state and federal regulations for the material type. As an option to complete removal (outside of the proposed building area), it may be feasible for existing foundations to remain in -place in the planned parking lot and landscape areas, provided the foundations are stable, are cut off at least 3 feet below the planned subgrade, and any hollow cores are grouted solid. However, construction remnants that remain in -place may cause excavation difficulties for new utilities and landscape plantings, and for future construction. All excavations must be backfilled with engineered fill performed under engineering controlled conditions. It is also expected to be necessary to bench into the surrounding soils as noted in Item No. 3 of the Guide Specifications enclosed in Appendix D. It is assumed that all existing pavement will be removed and replaced with new pavement. The existing pavement is recommended to be saw -cut (where needed) and removed from the site. Removed pavement could be pulverized into a well -graded material with a maximum 3-inch particle size and used as fill, subbase material, or subgrade stabilization material. After removal of the existing pavement, base course materials should then be removed and properly disposed of off -site. Base course materials could also be stockpiled on -site for future use as fill material, subbase material, or subgrade stabilization material. Existing base course materials that are removed and stockpiled could possibly be re -used as dense -graded base materials for the new pavement after the subgrade is properly prepared and improved which is included in the recommendations below; however, existing base materials are not expected to be suitable for use as the open -graded base course (shown in Table 1). A geotechnical engineer must test and approve stockpiled base course materials before reuse. If the base course materials are reused as base material, the pavement section given above might need to be thicker than recommended to account for a lower structural coefficient. Giles must be notified if the existing base material GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1G-1601002 Page 12 will be reused. Existing pavement and base material should be left in -place as long as possible to help protect the moisture- and disturbance -sensitive soil. Surface vegetation, trees and bushes, topsoil with adverse organic content, and otherwise unsuitable materials are recommended to be removed from the proposed building footprint, pavement areas, and other structural areas. Clearing, grubbing and stripping should extend at least several feet beyond proposed development areas, where feasible. Proof -Rolling and Fill Placement After the recommended demolition and removal, and once the site is cut (lowered) as needed, the subgrade is recommended to be proof -rolled with a fully -loaded, tandem -axle dump truck or other suitable construction equipment to help locate unstable soil based on subgrade deflection caused by the wheel loads of the proof -roll equipment. The entire site is recommended to be proof -rolled and, where feasible, proof -rolling should extend at least several feet beyond development areas. It is recommended that a geotechnical engineer observe proof -roll operations and evaluate the subgrade stability based on those observations. Areas of the site that are not accessible to proof -roll equipment are recommended to be evaluated (and approved) by a geotechnical engineer using appropriate means and methods. Based on the subsurface conditions at the test borings, and considering that the site is likely subject to perched groundwater, it is expected that unstable soil will be encountered during proof- rolling/testing. On a preliminary basis, unsuitable soil could be replaced with engineered fill, or it could be scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted. Specific recommendations for subgrade improvement should be provided by a geotechnical engineer during construction. The site is recommended to be raised, where necessary, to the planned finished grade with engineered fill immediately after the subgrade is confirmed to be stable and suitable to support the proposed site improvements. Engineered fill is recommended to be placed in uniform, relatively thin layers (lifts). Each layer of engineered fill is recommended to be compacted to at least 95 percent of the fill material's maximum dry density determined from the Standard Proctor compaction test (ASTM D698). As an exception, the in -place dry density of engineered fill within one foot of the pavement subgrade is recommended to be compacted to at least 100 percent of the fill's maximum dry density. Item Nos. 4 and 5 of the Guide Specfcafions give more information pertaining to selection and compaction of engineered fill. Due to shallow perched -groundwater, vibratory compaction equipment should be used with care. Use of vibratory compaction equipment near groundwater could cause soil to become unstable, possibly resulting in support and settlement problems. Static (non -vibratory) compaction equipment should be used near groundwater. Engineered fill that does not meet the density and water content requirements is recommended to be replaced with new fill or scared to a sufficient depth (likely 6 to 12 inches, or more), moisture -conditioned, and compacted to the required density. A subsequent lift of fill should only GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1 G-1601002 Page 13 be placed after a geotechnical engineer confirms that the previous lift was properly placed and compacted. Subgrade soil will likely need to be recompacted immediately before construction since equipment traffic and adverse weather may reduce soil stability. Use of Site Soil as Engineered Fill Site soil that does not contain adverse organic content or other deleterious materials, as noted in the Guide Specifications, could be used as engineered fill; however, the moisture content of site soil (used as engineered fill) will likely need to be adjusted through wetting or drying to obtain proper compaction. If construction is during adverse weather (discussed below), drying site soil will likely not be feasible. In that case, aggregate fill (or other material with a low water -sensitivity) will likely need to be imported to the site. Additional recommendations regarding fill selection, placement and compaction are given in the Guide Specifications. 8.8 Generalized Construction Considerations Adverse Weather Clayey site -soil is extremely sensitive to moisture and will likely become unstable when exposed to adverse weather such as rain, snow, and freezing temperatures. Therefore, it might be necessary to remove or stabilize the upper 6 to 12 inches (or more) of soil due to adverse weather, which commonly occurs during late fall, winter, and early spring. At least some over -excavation and/or stabilization of unstable soil should be expected if construction is during or after adverse weather. Because site preparation depends on weather, bids for site preparation, and other earthwork activities, should consider the time of year that construction will be conducted. To protect soil from adverse weather, the site surface is recommended to be smoothly graded and contoured during construction to divert surface water away from construction areas. Contoured subgrades are recommended to be rolled with a smooth -drum compactor, before precipitation, to "seal' the surface. Furthermore, construction traffic should be restricted to aggregate -covered areas in an effort to reduce traffic -related soil disturbance. Foundation, floor slab and pavement construction should begin immediately after suitable support is confirmed. Dewatering It is estimated that the water table was about 10 to 15 feet below -ground at the test boring locations, when the test borings were conducted; however, the site is likely subject to shallow, perched groundwater conditions. Perched groundwater is expected to be variable in terms of area and depth, and could be significant. Dewatering might, therefore, be necessary. Filtered sump pumps, drawing water from sump pits excavated in the bottom of construction trenches, will likely be adequate to remove water that collects in shallow excavations. Excavated sump pits should be fully -lined with a geotextile and filled with compacted, open -graded, free -draining aggregate. Water that accumulates in construction areas is recommended to be removed from excavations and other construction areas, along with unstable soil as soon as possible. WGILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1G-1601002 Page 14 Excavation Stability Excavations are recommended to be made in accordance with current OSHA excavation and trench safety standards, and other applicable requirements. Sides of excavations will likely need to be sloped or braced to maintain or develop a safe work environment. Temporary shoring must be designed according to applicable regulatory requirements. Contractors are responsible for excavation safety. Existing Fill Considerations The site is currently developed, and a former development previously occupied the site. Unsuitable materials might have been buried beneath the site surface during previous site grading or construction. Fill materials, where encountered, are recommended to be evaluated by a geotechnical engineer to determine if removal and replacement with engineered fill is necessary. Disposal of any unsuitable material should be in accordance with local, state and federal regulations for the material type. This report might need to be revised if conditions are encountered that differ from those described herein and reported on the Test Boring Logs. Existing Utilities All existing utilities should be identified and located, and any planned to be maintained should be relocated outside the proposed building area. Utilities that are not reused should be capped -off and removed in accordance with local codes and ordinances. Excavations for the removal of utilities are recommended to be backfilled with engineered fill placed under engineering controlled conditions. Grading operations must be done carefully so that existing utilities are not damaged or disturbed. Utility invert elevations, depths and sizes should be checked relative to the planned foundation elevations to identify specific concerns. 8.9 Recommended Construction Materials Testing Services This report was prepared assuming that a geotechnical engineer will perform Construction Materials Testing ("CMT) services during construction of the proposed development. It might be necessary for Giles to provide supplemental geotechnical recommendations based on the results of CMT services and specific details of the project not known at this time. 9.0 BASIS OF REPORT This report is strictly based on the project description given earlier in this report. Giles must be notified if any parts of the project description or our assumptions are not accurate so that this report can be amended, if needed. This report is based on the assumption that the facility will be designed and constructed according to the codes that govern construction at the site. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant No. 03840 Chanhassen, Minnesota Giles Project No. 1 G-1601002 Page 15 The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on estimated subsurface conditions as shown on the Test Boring Logs. Giles must be notified if the subsurface conditions that are encountered during construction of the proposed development differ from those shown on the Test Boring Logs because this report will likely need to be revised. General comments and limitations of this report are given in the appendix. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practices in the field of geotechnical engineering. No other warranty is either expressed or implied. © Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. 2016 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX A FIGURES AND TEST BORING LOGS The Test Boring Location Plan contained herein was prepared based upon information supplied by Giles' client, or others, along with Giles' field measurements and observations. The diagram is presented for conceptual purposes only and is intended to assist the reader in report interpretation. The Test Boring Logs and related information enclosed herein depict the subsurface (soil and water) conditions encountered at the specific boring locations on the date that the exploration was performed. Subsurface conditions may differ between boring locations and within areas of the site that were not explored with test borings. The subsurface conditions may also change at the boring locations over the passage of time. ■ r� R LEGEND: GEOTECHNICAL TEST BORING APPROXIMATE BENCHMARK CENTER OF ACCESS SCALE -BM AT EDGE OF W. 79th ST. ASSUMED ELEVATION = 100.0' N NOTES: 1.) TEST BORING LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. w E 2.) BASE MAP DEVELOPED FROM THE "SKETCH F", DATED 11.5.15, PREPARED BY ATKINS. 9 Jam. 5l IN\GNP P� e B�qD- ��voo) � ZO G ILES ASSOCIATES, INC. N DRIVE, SUITE N8 W22350 JOHNSO DRrV , WI 531 8 WAUKESHA, WI 53186 (262)544-0118 FIGURE 1 TEST BORING LOCATION PLAN PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 03840 CHANHASSENFSU 445 - 463 WEST 79th STREET & ADJACENT EAST PARCEL CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DESIGNED DRAWN SCALE DATE REVISED PDRBMS JSZ approX. 1"=50' 02-01-16 - PROJECT NO.: 1G-1601002 CAD No. 7 1601002-b1 ■ BORING NO.B LOCATION: 1 TEST BORING LOG SURFACE ELEVATION: PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 03840 100.8 feet 445-463 WEST 79TH STREET COMPLETION DATE: 01/27/16 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD REP; KEITH FLOWERS PROJECT NO: 1G-1601002 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION m a� N o o° 4 W PID NOTES m m A c (tsf) (ts6 (ts0 (0/6) O W NZ 6" t Topsoil 100 1-SS 5 BDL Brown Silty Clay, some Sand - Very Moist Gray -Brown mottled with Orange -Brown Silty Clay , little to some Sand (Fill) - Moist 2-SS 12 0.9 25 BDL Light Gray mottled with Orange -Brown Sandy Clay, trace Gravel -Moist 5 3-SS 11 1.0 25 BDL 95 Gray -Brown Sandy Clay, trace Gravel - Moist (Includes calcareous leachate seams/lenses) 4-SS 16 2.6 20 BDL Brown -Gray Sandy Clay, trace Gravel - Moist 10 5-SS 20 2.5 19 BDL 90 Dark Gray Silty Clay, some Sand, trace Gravel - Moist 15 14 2.3 17 BDL 6-SS 85 Boring Terminated at about 16 feet (EL. 84.8.) Water Observation Data Remarks: Q Water Encountered During Drilling: Y Water Level At End of Drilling: Cave Depth At End of Drilling: 11 ft. Water Level After Drilling: Cave Depth After Drilling: = b lchow�n ion thereBoring Locao nn'Ian. are approximate b mlary betxeen soil Lyles. The acdtal Iranallon may be gradual and may vary considerably b hveen last borinpa. Location of test bo W BORING NO. B LOCATION: 2 TEST BORING LOG SURFACE ELEVATION: PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO.03840 100.9 feet 445463 WEST 79TH STREET COMPLETION DATE: 01/27/16 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD REP: KEITH FLOWERS PROJECT NO: 1G-1601002 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION r c 0 m n a~ N 4 O° (1sf) r1 (tsf) W 11/61 PID NOTES n 0 G > to W Ee6 n O oz laf) 9"t Topsoil 100 1-SS 5 28 BDL Dark Gray Silty Clay, little to some Sand, trace Gravel - Moist 2-SS 7 28 BDL Light Gray mottled with Orange -Brown Sandy Clay, some Sand, trace Gravel - Moist 5 3-SS 9 2.9 26 BDL 95 Gray -Brown mottled with Orange -Brown Sandy Clay, trace Gravel - Moist 4-SS 15 1.3 19 BDL 10 15 2.4 21 BDL 5-SS 90 Dark Gray Silty Clay, little to some Sand, trace Gravel - Moist 15 14 1.5 17 BDL 6-SS Boring Terminated at about 16 feet (EL. 84.9') Water Observation Data Remarks: SZ Water Encountered During Drilling: Y Water Level At End of Drilling: -- Cave Depth At End of Drilling: 10.5 ft. Water Level After Drilling: Cave Depth After Drilling: L soma Clnngee In strata Intlic Ld by the lines are approximate boundary between soil types. The actual transition may be gradual and may vary conslEembty bMween test borings. t.acagon of test boring is shown on [he Boring Location Plan. BORING NO.B LOCATION: 3 TEST BORING LOG GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. SURFACE ELEVATION: 100.2 feet PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 03840 445-463 WEST 79TH STREET CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO: 1G-1601002 COMPLETION DATE: 01/27/16 FIELD REP: KEITH FLOWERS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION i m' 9 m W m a~ E c N2 N Ou (tS1) 4 (+st) Q. (tsfl w (%) PID NOTES 6"t Asphalt Concrete 6" t Aggregate Base Course 5— 10__90 15 100 95 85 — 7 10 14 27 16 1.8 2.3 3.8 3.2 1.7 30 20 20 20 21 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 1-SS Fill: Gray -Brown Sandy Gravel - Wet a' Blue -Gray Silty Clay, little Sand - Moist 2-SS Light Gray mottled with Orange -Brown Sandy Clay, trace Gravel - Moist 3-SS Gray -Brown Sandy Clay, little Gravel - Moist 4-SS 5-SS 6-SS Boring Terminated at about 16 feet (EL. 84.2') Water Observation Data Remarks: Q Water Encountered During Drilling: Water Level At End of Drilling: Cave Depth At End of Drilling: 10 ft. Water Level After Drilling: Cave Depth After Drilling: Y - t CMiges in ctrata indlcaletl by Ne linee are approximate boundary between sail types. The actual tmnsigon may ba gradual and may wry considarably between test borings. l.ocailon a test boring ie chwwn on Ne ewiig Lorabon Plan. BORING NO. & LOCATION: 4 TEST BORING LOG SURFACE ELEVATION: PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO.03840 100.1 feet 445-463 WEST 79TH STREET COMPLETION DATE: 01/27/16 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD REP: KEITH FLOWERS PROJECT NO: 1 G-1601002 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION i m 0 a ar N O O° O W PID NOTES d o ttsn fin can ICI a W 15 N2 6" i Asphalt Concrete 1-SS 6" t Aggregate Base Course — BDL Fill: Brown -Gray Sandy Gravel - Moist o Q Gray Silty Clay, little Sand - Moist 2-SS 6 1.0 26 BDL Light Gray mottled with Orange -Brown Sandy Clay, trace Gravel - Moist 5 95 3-SS 9 2.0 22 BDL Gray -Brown mottled with Gray Sandy Clay, trace Gravel - Moist 4-SS 14 3.2 19 BDL Gray -Brown Sandy Clay, trace Gravel - Moist 110 90 5-SS 11 1.8 21 BDL Brown Clayey Sand with Gravel - Moist 85 6SS 17 BDL Boring Terminated at about 16 feet (EL. 84.1') Water Observation Data Remarks: Q Water Encountered During Drilling: Y Water Level At End of Drilling: - Cave Depth At End of Drilling: 10 ft. Water Level After Drilling: Cave Depth After Drilling: = --- kslw im Mee eonn6cahHloca�onthe� an aPG�nzirtufe Ewndary Eetwren sal ypea. The acWal tra�uitbn maY be 9�wI aM ^uY va�Y carcitleraEiY between lest borings. Location W test bang BORING NO. ✓4 LOCATION: 5 TEST BORING LOG SURFACE ELEVATION: PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO.03840 99.2 feet 445-463 WEST 79TH STREET COMPLETION DATE: 01/27/16 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD REP: KEITH FLOWERS PROJECT NO: 1G-1601002 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION r c m a, c a~ N Cl �° CL W PID NOTES d E o (tsn (tsn (tsn (�) 0 W In z 4"± Asphalt Concrete 8"± Aggregate Base Course — BDL 1-SS Fill: Gray -Brown Sandy Gravel - Moist o (Includes Asphalt - Concrete Rubble) o 97. aQ Light Gray mottled with Orange -Brown Clayey Silt with fine Sand - Moist 2 5 -- 2-SS 6 1.5 26 BDL Gray mottled Sandy Clay - Moist 95. 5.0 3-SS 13 19 BDL Boring Terminated at about 6 feet (EL. 932) Water Observation Data Remarks: g Water Encountered During Drilling: Water Level At End of Drilling: Cave Depth At End of Drilling: 3.5 ft. Water Level After Drilling: Cave Depth After Drilling: Y 1 Changes in strata iMicaled by Me lines are awmximata boundarybe n soil types. The ac al tang may be gradual and may vary consideably between test borings. Location of test boring re shown on the Bodrg Location Plan. BORING NO. & LOCATION: 6 TEST BORING LOG SURFACE ELEVATION: PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 03840 100.6 feet 445-463 WEST 79TH STREET COMPLETION DATE: 01/27/16 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD REP: KEITH FLOWERS PROJECT NO: 1G-1601002 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION i 2 A m 4 o.~ N 0° �° Q. W PID NOTES d m o (tsf) (tsn (tsn 0/6) o W 0z ,V t Asphalt Concrete B"t Aggregate Base Course 1-SS 100 — BDL Fill: Gray -Brown Sandy Gravel - Moist o Q (Includes Asphalt - Concrete Rubble) o O a� Gray -Brown Silty Clay, little to some Sand, trace Gravel - Moist 2 5 2-SS 8 24 BDL 97. Blue -Gray Silty Clay, trace Sand - Moist 5.0 3-SS 9 1.2 36 BDL 95. Boring Terminated at about 6 feet (EL. 94.6') i i i I i Water Observation Data Remarks: SZ Water Encountered During Drilling: .$ Water Level At End of Drilling: - Cave Depth At End of Drilling: 3.5 ft. Water Level After Drilling: Cave Depth After Drilling: 1 Charges in strata indnteti by gia lines are approximate bouMary between coil types. The act,W tarwition may be gatlual arut may vary cc rnsirieably between test borings. Location atest boring u shown m the Boring l.onahon Plan. BORING NO.B LOCATION: 7 TEST BORING LOG SURFACE ELEVATION: PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT NO. 03840 101feet 445-463 WEST 79TH STREET COMPLETION DATE: 01/27/16 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD REP: KEITH FLOWERS PROJECT NO: 1 G-1601002 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION i L d 4 m ~ N 4 O° Q. W PID NOTES d m E O (tsf) (tsf) (tsf) (0/6) o W Wz 4" t Asphalt Concrete 8" t Aggregate Base Course 100 1-SS — BDL Fill: Light Brown Silty Sand and Gravel - Dry Blue -Gray Silty Clay, little to some Sand - Moist 2.5 2-SS 10 25 BDL 97. 5.0 3-SS 4 2.0 28 BDL Boring Terminated at about 6 feet (EL. 95') Water Observation Data Remarks: SZ Water Encountered During Drilling: Y Water Level At End of Drilling: Cave Depth At End of Drilling: 3.5 ft. Water Level After Drilling: Cave Depth After Drilling: i CMnges in strati irgicmad q'tM lines are aMmximaM boundary between sal types. The actual transgion may M gradual and may vary co aidambly Mtween test bori Location of teat boring o shown on the Boring lxicabon Fan. APPENDIX B FIELD PROCEDURES The field operations were conducted in general accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) designation D 420 entitled "Standard Guide for Sampling Rock and Rock" and/or other relevant specifications. Soil samples were preserved and transported to Giles' laboratory in general accordance with the procedures recommended by ASTM designation D 4220 entitled "Standard Practice for Preserving and Transporting Soil Samples." Brief descriptions of the sampling, testing and field procedures commonly performed by Giles are provided herein. GENERAL FIELD PROCEDURES Test Borina Elevations The ground surface elevations reported on the Test Boring Logs are referenced to the assumed benchmark shown on the Boring Location Plan (Figure 1). Unless otherwise noted, the elevations were determined with a conventional hand -level and are accurate to within about 1 foot. Test Boring Locations The test borings were located on -site based on the existing site features and/or apparent property lines. Dimensions illustrating the approximate boring locations are reported on the Boring Location Plan (Figure 1). Water Level Measurement The water levels reported on the Test Boring Logs represent the depth of "free" water encountered during drilling and/or after the drilling tools were removed from the borehole. Water levels measured within a granular (sand and gravel) soil profile are typically indicative of the water table elevation. It is usually not possible to accurately identify the water table elevation with cohesive (clayey) soils, since the rate of seepage is slow. The water table elevation within cohesive soils must therefore be determined over a period of time with groundwater observation wells. It must be recognized that the water table may fluctuate seasonally and during periods of heavy precipitation. Depending on the subsurface conditions, water may also become perched above the water table, especially during wet periods. Borehole Backfilling Procedures Each borehole was backfilled upon completion of the field operations. If potential contamination was encountered, and/or if required by state or local regulations, boreholes were backfilled with an "impervious" material (such as bentonite slurry). Borings that penetrated pavements, sidewalks, etc. were "capped" with Portland Cement concrete, asphaltic concrete, or a similar surface material. It must, however, be recognized that the backfill material may settle, and the surface cap may subside, over a period of time. Further backfilling and/or re -surfacing by Giles' client or the property owner may be required. WGILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD SAMPLING AND TESTING PROCEDURES Auger Sampling (AU) Soil samples are removed from the auger flights as an auger is withdrawn above the ground surface. Such samples are used to determine general soil types and identify approximate soil stratifications. Auger samples are highly disturbed and are therefore not typically used for geotechnical strength testing. Split -Barrel Sampling (SS) — (ASTM D-1586) A split -barrel sampler with a 2-inch outside diameter is driven into the subsoil with a 140- pound hammer free -falling a vertical distance of 30 inches. The summation of hammer - blows required to drive the sampler the final 12-inches of an 18-inch sample interval is defined as the "Standard Penetration Resistance' or N-value is an index of the relative density of granular soils and the comparative consistency of cohesive soils. A soil sample is collected from each SPT interval. Shelbv Tube SamDlina (ST) — (ASTM D-1587 A relatively undisturbed soil sample is collected by hydraulically advancing a thin -walled Shelby Tube sampler into a soil mass. Shelby Tubes have a sharp cutting edge and are commonly 2 to 5 inches in diameter. Bulk Sample (BS) A relatively large volume of soils is collected with a shovel or other manually -operated tool. The sample is typically transported to Giles' materials laboratory in a sealed bag or bucket. Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DC) — (ASTM STP 399) This test is conducted by driving a 1.5-inch-diameter cone into the subsoil using a 15- pound steel ring (hammer), free -falling a vertical distance of 20 inches. The number of hammer -blows required to drive the cone 13/4 inches is an indication of the soil strength and density, and is defined as "N". The Dynamic Cone Penetration test is commonly conducted in hand auger borings, test pits and within excavated trenches. - Continued - GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Ring -Lined Barrel Sampling — (ASTM D 3550) In this procedure, a ring -lined barrel sampler is used to collect soil samples for classification and laboratory testing. This method provides samples that fit directly into laboratory test instruments without additional handling/disturbance. Sampling and Testing Procedures The field testing and sampling operations were conducted in general accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and/or other relevant specifications. Results of the field testing (i.e. N-values) are reported on the Test Boring Logs. Explanations of the terms and symbols shown on the logs are provided on the appendix enclosure entitled "General Notes'. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX C LABORATORY TESTING AND CLASSIFICATION The laboratory testing was conducted under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer in accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and/or other relevant specifications. Brief descriptions of laboratory tests commonly performed by Giles are provided herein. LABORATORY TESTING AND CLASSIFICATION Photoionization Detector (PID) In this procedure, soil samples are "scanned" in Giles' analytical laboratory using a Photoionization Detector (PID). The instrument is equipped with an 11.7 eV lamp calibrated to a Benzene Standard and is capable of detecting a minute concentration of certain Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) vapors, such as those commonly associated with petroleum products and some solvents. Results of the PID analysis are expressed in HNu (manufacturer's) units rather than actual concentration. Moisture Content (w) (ASTM D 2216) Moisture content is defined as the ratio of the weight of water contained within a soil sample to the weight of the dry solids within the sample. Moisture content is expressed as a percentage. Unconfined Compressive Strength (qu) (ASTM D 2166) An axial load is applied at a uniform rate to a cylindrical soil sample. The unconfined compressive strength is the maximum stress obtained or the stress when 15% axial strain is reached, whichever occurs first. Calibrated Penetrometer Resistance (qp) The small, cylindrical tip of a hand-held penetrometer is pressed into a soil sample to a prescribed depth to measure the soils capacity to resist penetration. This test is used to evaluate unconfined compressive strength. Vane -Shear Strength (gs) The blades of a vane are inserted into the flat surface of a soil sample and the vane is rotated until failure occurs. The maximum shear resistance measured immediately prior to failure is taken as the vane -shear strength. Loss -on -Ignition (ASTM D 2974 Method C) The Loss -on -Ignition (L.O.I.) test is used to determine the organic content of a soil sample. The procedure is conducted by heating a dry soil sample to 4400C in order to burn -off or "ash" organic matter present within the sample. The L.O.I. value is the ratio of the weight loss due to ignition compared to the initial weight of the dry sample. L.O.I. is expressed as a percentage. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Particle Size Distribution (ASTB D 421. D 422. and D 1140 This test is performed to determine the distribution of specific particle sizes (diameters) within a soil sample. The distribution of coarse -grained soil particles (sand and gravel) is determined from a "sieve analysis," which is conducted by passing the sample through a series of nested sieves. The distribution of fine-grained soil particles (silt and clay) is determined from a "hydrometer analysis" which is based on the sedimentation of particles suspended in water. Consolidation Test (ASTM D 2435) In this procedure, a series of cumulative vertical loads are applied to a small, laterally confined soil sample. During each load increment, vertical compression (consolidation) of the sample is measured over a period of time. Results of this test are used to estimate settlement and time rate of settlement. Classification of Samples Each soil sample was visually -manually classified, based on texture and plasticity, in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2488-75). The classifications are reported on the Test Boring Logs. Laboratory Testing The laboratory testing operations were conducted in general accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and/or other relevant specifications. Results of the laboratory tests are provided on the Test Boring Logs or other appendix enclosures. Explanation of the terms and symbols used on the logs is provided on the appendix enclosure entitled "General Notes." WGILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 0 California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Test ASTM D-1833 The CBR test is used for evaluation of a soil subgrade for pavement design. The test consists of measuring the force required for a 3-square-inch cylindrical piston to penetrate 0.1 or 0.2 inch into a compacted soil sample. The result is expressed as a percent of force required to penetrate a standard compacted crushed stone. Unless a CBR test has been specifically requested by the client, the CBR is estimated from published charts, based on soil classification and strength characteristics. A typical correlation chart is below. CAUFORNIA BEARING RATIO -CBR 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 90100 0 -,,'1 YYIY■■YI■■■■■YIYYYYYIY■■■■ YYIYYIYY■■■Y�YYII■YIYIYi■■■ 121 3 4 5 6 7 89 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 90100 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX D GENERAL INFORMATION I GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUBGRADE AND GRADE PREPARATION FOR FILL, FOUNDATION, FLOOR SLAB AND PAVEMENT SUPPORT; AND SELECTION, PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF FILL SOILS USING STANDARD PROCTOR PROCEDURES 1. Construction monitoring and testing of subgrades and grades for fill, foundation, floor slab and pavement; and fill selection, placement and compaction shall be performed by an experienced soils engineer and/or his representatives. 2. All compaction fill, subgrades and grades shall be (a) underlain by suitable bearing material; (b) free of all organic, frozen, or other deleterious material, and (c) observed, tested and approved by qualified engineering personnel representing an experienced soils engineer. Preparation of subgrades after stripping vegetation, organic or other unsuitable materials shall consist of (a) proof -rolling to detect soil, wet yielding soils or other unstable materials that must be undercut, (b) scarifying top 6 to 8 inches, (c) moisture conditioning the soils as required, and (d) recompaction to same minimum in -situ density required for similar materials indicated under Item 5. Note: compaction requirements for pavement subgrade are higher than other areas. Weather and construction equipment may damage compacted fill surface and reworking and retesting may be necessary to assure proper performance. 3. In overexcavation and fill areas, the compacted fill must extend (a) a minimum I foot lateral distance beyond the exterior edge of the foundation at bearing grade or pavement subgrade and down to compacted fill subgrade on a maximum 0.5(fi):1(V) slope, (b) 1 foot above footing grade outside the building, and (c) to floor subgrade inside the building. Fill shall be placed and compacted on a 5(H):I(V) slope or must be stepped or benched as required to flatten if not specifically approved by qualified personnel under the direction of an experienced soil engineer. 4. The compacted fill materials shall be free of deleterious, organic, or frozen matter, shall contain no chemicals that may result in the material being classified as "contaminated", and shall be low -expansive with a maximum Liquid Limit (ASTM D-423) and Plasticity Index (ASTM D-424) of 30 and 15, respectively, unless specifically tested and found to have low expansive properties and approved by an experienced soils engineer. The top 12 inches of compacted fill should have a maximum 3-inch-particle diameter and all underlying compacted fill a maximum 6-inch-diameter unless specifically approved by an experienced soils engineer. All fill materials must be tested and approved under the direction of an experienced soils engineer prior to placement. If the fill is to provide non -frost susceptible characteristics, it must be classified as a clean GW, GP, SW or SP per the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487). 5. For structural fill depths less than 20 feet, the density of the structural compacted fill and scarified subgrade and grades shall not be less than 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by Standard Proctor (ASTM-698) with the exception of the top 12 inches of pavement subgrade which shall have a minimum in -situ density of 100 percent of maximum dry density, or 5 percent higher than underlying fill materials. Where the structural fill depth is greater than 20 feet, the portions below 20 feet should have a minimum in -place density of 100 percent of its maximum dry density of 5 percent greater than the top 20 feet. The moisture content of cohesive soil shall not vary by more than -I to +3 percent and granular soil f3 percent of the optimum when placed and compacted or recompacted, unless specifically recommended/approved by the soils engineer monitoring the placement and compaction. Cohesive soils with moderate to high expansion potentials (PI>15) should, however, be placed, compacted and maintained prior to construction at a moisture content 3t1 percent above optimum moisture content to limit further heave. The fill shall be placed in layers with a maximum loose thickness of 8 inches for foundations and 10 inches for floor slabs and pavement, unless specifically approved by the soils engineer taking into consideration the type of materials and compaction equipment being used. The compaction equipment should consist of suitable mechanical equipment specifically designed for soil compaction. Bulldozers or similar tracked vehicles are typically not suitable for compaction. 6. Excavation, filling, subgrade and grade preparation shall be performed in a manner and sequence that will provide drainage at all times and proper control of erosion. Precipitation, springs and seepage water encountered shall be pumped or drained to provide a suitable working platform. Springs or water seepage encountered during grading/foundation construction must be called to the soil engineer's attention immediately for possible construction procedure revision or inclusion of an underdrain system. 7. Non-structural fill adjacent to structural fill should typically be placed in unison to provide lateral support. Backfill along walls must be placed and compacted with care to ensure excessive unbalanced lateral pressures do not develop. The type of fill material placed adjacent to below -grade walls (i.e. basement walls and retaining walls) must be properly tested and approved by an experienced soils engineer with consideration for the lateral pressure used in the wall design. 8. Whenever, in the opinion of the soils engineer or the Owner's Representatives, an unstable condition is being created either by cutting or filling, the work shall not proceed into that area until an appropriate geotechnical exploration and analysis has been performed and the grading plan revised, if found necessary. WGILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL COMMENTS The soil samples obtained during the subsurface exploration will be retained for a period of thirty days. If no instructions are received, they will be disposed of at that time. This report has been prepared exclusively for the client in order to aid in the evaluation of this property and to assist the architects and engineers in the design and preparation of the project plans and specifications. Copies of this report may be provided to contractor(s), with contract documents, to disclose information relative to this project. The report, however, has not been prepared to serve as the plans and specifications for actual construction without the appropriate interpretation by the project architect, structural engineer, and/or civil engineer. Reproduction and distribution of this report must be authorized by the client and Giles. This report has been based on assumed conditions/characteristics of the proposed development where specific information was not available. It is recommended that the architect, civil engineer and structural engineer along with any other design professionals involved in this project carefully review these assumptions to ensure they are consistent with the actual planned development. When discrepancies exist, they should be brought to our attention to ensure they do not affect the conclusions and recommendations provided herein. The project plans and specifications may also be submitted to Giles for review to ensure that the geotechnical related conclusions and recommendations provided herein have been correctly interpreted. The analysis of this site was based on a subsoil profile interpolated from a limited subsurface exploration. If the actual conditions encountered during construction vary from those indicated by the borings, Giles must be contacted immediately to determine if the conditions alter the recommendations contained herein. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practices in the field of geotechnical engineering. No other warranty is either expressed or implied. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. CHARACTERISTICS AND RATINGS OF UNIFIED SOIL SYSTEM CLASSES FOR SOIL CONSTRUCTION " Class Compaction Characteristics Max. Dry Density Standard proctor (pet) Compressibility and Expansion Drainage and Permeability Value as an Embankment Material SubgradePavement When Not Value asLGoodFairto Subject toWith J FrostPalliative Value as Temporary Dust With Bituminoua Treatment GW Good: tractor, rubber -tired, steel wheel or vibrato roller 125-135 Almost none Good drainage, ious Very stable Excellent oor Excellent GP Good: tractor, rubber -tired, steel wheel or vibratory roller 115-125 Almost none Good drainage, nervious Reasonably stable Excellent to good Poor GM Good: rubber -tired or light sheepsfoot roller 120.135 Slight Poor drainage, semiDervious Reasonably stable Excellent to good Fair to poor Poor Poor to fair GC Good to fair: rubber -tired or shee sfoot roller 115-130 Slight Poor drainage, impervious Reasonably stable Good Good to fair •' Excellent Excellent SW Good: tractor, rubber -tired or vibratory roller 110.130 Almost none Good drainage, Pervious Very stable Good Fair to poor Fair to Door Good SP Good: tractor, mbber-tired or vibratory roller 100-120 Almost none Good drainage, pervious Reasonably stable when dense Good to fair Poor Poor Poor to fair SM Good: rubber -tired or sheepsfoot roller 110-125 Slight Poor drainage, impervious Reasonably stable when dense Good to fair Poor Poor Poor to fair SC Good to fair: rubber -tired or sheerisfocit roller 105-125 Slight to medium Poor drainage, in"MerViOUS Reasonably stable Good to fair Fair to poor Excellent Excellent ML Good to poor: rubber -tired or sheepsfoot roller 95-120 Slight to medium Poor drainage, impervious Poor stability, high density reumed Fair to poor Not suitable Poor Poor CL Good to fair: sheepsfoot or rubber- tired roller 95-120 Medium No drainage, im ervious Good stability Fair to poor Not suitable Poor Poor OL Fair to poor: sheepsfoot or rubber- tired roller 80-100 Medium to high Poor drainage, impervious Unstable, should not be used Poor Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable MH Fair to poor: sheepsfoot or rubber- tired roller 70-95 High Poor drainage, impervious Poor stability, should not be used Poor Not suitable Very poor Not suitable CH Fair to poor: sheepsfoot roller 80-105 Very high No drainage, impervious Fair stability, may soften on [expansion Poor to very poor Not suitable Very poor Not suitable OH Fair to poor: sheepsfoot roller 65-100 High No drainage, impervious Unstable, should not be used Very poor Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Pt Not suitable Very high Fair [o poor drama a Should not be used Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable • "The Un and Few •" Notsuin M UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (ASTM D-2487) Group Major Divisions Typical Names Laboratory Classification Criteria Symbols a Well -graded gravels, D (D )' o+ 0 GW gravel -sand mixtures, 6 o C. = 60 greater than 4;C = 30 between 1 and 3 little or no fines E D10 D10x D. i; N C o Poorly graded gravels, ^ '� GP gravel -sand mixtrues, N Not meeting all gradation requirements for GW H little or no fines > O > C N0 o a d'^ o o- c_u 0 d 0z c S ,� o GM' Silty gravels, gravel- = ,".i v A d u m Atterberg limits below"A"line or P.I. Limits plotting within shaded p g ry d " m E A sand -silt mixtures "'z3,a�;, E° 0 less than4 area, above"A"line with P.I. z u „ o= 3 i o between 4 and 7 are ,°, £ w m'F c J borderline cases requiring v iO =' = v 3 ? use of dual symbols Atterberg limits a o a GC Clayey gravels, gravel- a E - m° above"A"line or P.I. sand -clay mixtures , o- greater than? v sa (D'°)z v c SW gravellly sands, little �" C =D-60 greater than 4;C = between 1 and 3 ° U E o w ;° o a, nofines ° c D10 D10x D. N a w o� w= ,c Poorly graded sands, o i w a c SP gravelly sands, little or w a, .R a � Not meeting all gradation requirements for SW no fines a °' @ o. n y oa C. O Z a ny ar U L v o •° c d o' E d Silty sands, sand -silt E a w°° v c —� Atterberg limits Limits plotting within shaded P 9 E t o = .cc SM' mixtures 0 w °, below"A"line or P.l. less area, above"A"line with P.I. '3 A C u C between 4 and 7 are w E �'U o v borderline cases requiring Atterberg limits i N use of dual symbols ° a SC Clayey sands, sand -clay j above " A" line or P.I. a mixtures greater than 7 Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock ML flour, silty or clayey fine 60 M sands, or clayey silts with slight plasticity °>, w Inorganic clays of low CL to medium plasticity, o _ — gravellyclays, sandy a 6 ^ clays, silty clays z c w Organic silts and m .o « OL organic silty clays of low plasticity w E • 30 o Inorganic silts, mica- MH ceous or diatomaceous g ax c �, Y fine sandy or silty soils, '� ON W LL y N `w elastic silts s m U m o a! p Inorganic clays of high r .E CH plasticity, fat clays _ u c N r v Organic clays of ru 0'_ OH medium to high d-Ml ° J plasticity, organic silts MO M T U Fo+ 1O .o Pt Peat and other highly °0 N mo 10 20 30 40 so W 70 e0 E' 0 organic soils v,,;3 'Division of GM and SM groups into subdivisions of d and u are for roads and airfields only. Subdivision is based on Atterberg limits, suffix d used when L.L. is 28 or less and the P.I. is 6 or less; the suffix u is used when L.L. is greater than 28. 0 Borderline classifications, used for soils possessing characteristics of two groups, are designated by combinations of group sympols. For example GW-GC,well-graded gravel -sand mixture with clay binder. Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. 0 GENERAL NOTES SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION All samples are visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487-75 or D-2488-75) DESCRIPTIVE TERM (% BY DRY WEIGHT) PARTICLE SIZE (DIAMETER) Trace: 1-10% Boulders:8 inch and larger Little: 11-20% Cobbles: 3 inch to 8 inch Some: 21-35% Gravel: coarse - % to 3 inch And/Adjective 36-500A fine —No. 4 (4.76 ram) to % inch Sand: coarse —No. 4 (4.76 mm) to No. 10 (2.0 mm) medium —No. 10 (2.0 ram) to No. 40 (0.42 mm) fine — No. 40 (0.42 mm) to No. 200 (0.074 ram) Silt: No. 200 (0.074 mm) and smaller (non -plastic) Clay: No 200 (0.074 mm) and smaller (plastic) SOIL PROPERTY SYMBOLS DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS Dd: Dry Density (pcf) SS: Split -Spoon LL: Liquid Limit, percent ST: Shelby Tube — 3 inch O.D. (except where noted) PL: Plastic Limit, percent CS: 3 inch O.D. California Ring Sampler PI: Plasticity Index (LL-PL) DC: Dynamic Cone Penetrometer per ASTM LOL Loss on Ignition, percent Special Technical Publication No. 399 Gs: Specific Gravity AU: Auger Sample K: Coefficient of Permeability DB: Diamond Bit W. Moisture content, percent CB: Carbide Bit qp: Calibrated Penetrometer Resistance, tsf WS: Wash Sample qs: Vane -Shear Strength, tsf RB: Rock -Roller Bit qu: Unconfined Compressive Strength, tsf BS: Bulk Sample qc: Static Cone Penetrometer Resistance Note: Depth intervals for sampling shown on Record of (correlated to Unconfined Compressive Strength, tsf) Subsurface Exploration are not indicative of sample PID: Results of vapor analysis conducted on representative recovery, but position where sampling initiated samples utilizing a Photoionization Detector calibrated to a benzene standard. Results expressed in HNU-Units. (BDL=Below Detection Limit) N: Penetration Resistance per 12 inch interval, or fraction thereof, for a standard 2 inch O.D. Q% inch I.D.) split spoon sampler driven with a 140 pound weight free -falling 30 inches. Performed in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test Specifications (ASTM D- 1586). N in blows per foot equals sum of N-Values where plus sign (+) is shown. Nc: Penetration Resistance per 1% inches of Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. Approximately equivalent to Standard Penetration Test N-Value in blows per foot. Nc Penetration Resistance per 12 inch interval, or fraction thereof, for California Ring Sampler driven with a 140 pound weight free -falling 30 inches per ASTM D-3550. Not equivalent to Standard Penetration Test N-Value. SOIL STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS COHESIVE (CLAYEY) SOILS NON -COHESIVE (GRANULAR) SOILS COMPARATIVE BLOWS PER COMPRESSIVE RELATIVE BLOWS PER CONSISTENCY FOOT (N) STRENGTH (TSF) DENSITY FOOT (N) Very Soft 0-2 0 - 0.25 Very Loose 0-4 Soft 3-4 0.25 - 0.50 Loose 5-10 Medium Stiff 5-8 0.50 - 1.00 Firm 11 - 30 Stiff 9 —15 1.00 - 2.00 Dense 31- 50 Very Stiff 16 — 30 2.00 - 4.00 Very Dense 51+ Hard 31+ 4.00+ DEGREE OF DEGREE OF EXPANSIVE PLASTICITY PI POTENTIAL PI None to Slight 0-4 Low 0 - 15 Slight 5-10 Medium 15 - 25 Medium 11-30 High 25+ High to Very High 31+ GILES ASSOCIATES, INC. Important Information About Your Geolechnical Engineeping Repots Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. The following information is provided to help you manage your risks. Geotechnical Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engi- neer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solelyfor the client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one —not even you —should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read ON Full Report Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on A Unique Set of Project -Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project -specific fac- tors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the client's goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates oth- erwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that an erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse, • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team, or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes —even minor ones and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. Subsurface Conditions Can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineer- ing repodwhose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua- tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. Most Geotecludcal Findings Are Professional Opinions Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engi- neers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ —sometimes signifiantly— from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A Report's Recommendations Are Alot final Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engi- neers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geolechnial engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction observation. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to Misinterpretation Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geo- technical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review per i- rient elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation. Do Net Redraw the Engineer's Lem Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should neverbe redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give con- tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest tee may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contrac- lors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disci- plines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled 'limitations' many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsi- bilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Head these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvb,mnoartal Contxn Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a gecenviron- menial study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geDen- vironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk man- agement guidance. Do not rely on an environmental reportprepared for someone else. MUM Professional Assistme To Deal With Mold Diverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction, operation, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from growing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be devised for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated into a com- prehensive plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional mold prevention consultant. Because just a small amount of water or moisture can lead to the development of severe mold infestations, a num- ber of mold prevention strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry. While groundwater, water infiltration, and similar issues may have been addressed as part of the geotechnical engineering study whose findings are conveyed in this report, the geotechnical engineer in charge of this project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of the services per- formed in connection with the geotechnical engineer's study were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold preven- tion. Proper implementation of the recommendations conveyed in this report will not of itself be sufficient to prevent mold from growing in or on the structure involved. Rely, on Your ASFE-Member Geotechocial Engmeer for Additional Assistance Membership in ASFFJThe Best People on Earth exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with you ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information. ASFE Tas fast Fossil on I.rr. 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301/565-2733 Facsimile:3011589-2017 e-mail: info®asfe.org www.asfe.org Copyright 2004 by ASFE, Inc. Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is stricV prohibited except with ASFES specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of ASFE, and ony for purposes of scholarly research or book review Only members of ASFE may use this document as a complement to or as an element of a geotechnical engineering report. Any other fimr, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being an ASFE member could be committing negligent or intentional (fraudulent) misrepresentation. IIGER06045.OM Geotechnical, Environmental & Construction Materials Consultants 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 CITY OF I j3 )1 roIe� 46 MINNEAPOLIS 0 1000 Mr. Jay M.Scott Chief Manager Solomon Real E: 11995 Singletree Eden Prairie, Mt, 02 1 P 0003195036 SEP 23. 9 MAILED FROMZIP CODE 55317 RECEIVED OCT 0 3 2016 CITY OF CHANHASSEN NIXIE 553 7—c 1 0009/30/16 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED u m A R i F r n c n F h A p n SC: 55317014747 *2611-06028-23-37 i n wir,ir10- i liltu III II I I 11111 ill � it Ill I ! ill II JO Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time•• Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Site Plan Review with Variances to construct a 4,775 square - Proposal: foot restaurant on 1.32 acres of property zoned Highway and Business Services District BH Applicant: Chi -fil-A Inc. Owner. Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. Property 445 West 791h Street Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about'this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-06. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous Questions & by email at bgenerous(8ci.chanhassen.mmus or by phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, *ckets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to NALww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! Villy Review Procedure: + Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Condibonal and Interim Uses, WetlarW Alterations, Razonings. Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a Public hearing before Me Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property mmin 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of Me application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on Me subject application Mat includes all partment Information and a recommendation. These report are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the Public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the Public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple malonty vote of the City Counal except rezMings am land use amendments from residential to commerciallmdustr101. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within BO days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to Complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should Check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for Me City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespsrsan/rephaumtative Is encouraged to provide a Contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal Staff is also available to review the project with any interested pare on(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, Me City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any Correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Counol. If you wish to have something to be included In the report, lease Contact the Planning Staff person named on Me notificabon. This map is neither a leg as one. This ��QQ a cor wunty, sUte�h.;detal be used for re%erence p� Information System (GIs,' recordeo ot. 1 , �:0 PItMEY BOWEB 021 P $ 000.485 0003195036 APR 072016 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota55317 www.ci.chanhassen m raft ''SO SIN ` 3 I EXP yet 51 E _ \\ c0 `1iP?P,�t� ER35 p70cV:GVo \"\`\\.,, NiSj c MN 55 w\1NI", �� NHH CHANHASSEN PARTNERS LLC not fep?�41Rk43 ya,pSty 317 2ND AVE S STE 800 purpose regwnng e—xaciing measurement \,r\\' �" .,,n in the depiction of geographic features. Iterrorsor „,ease contact 952- MINNEAPOLIS, MN 56401-2219 227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provio wriesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map so _.yes that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, used Or third parties which arise out of the user's a�rT_,OFf .j1jgF c�,{jy li'II'I'lll'I'I'IIIiIIIi"I'I'I�Iiilltl'i'IIi�IIIIi'II'III'I 1� RILEY f PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 14500 Martin Drive I Suite 1500 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-607-6512 w .rpbcwd.org Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Permit Application Review Permit No:2016-014 Received complete: April 1, 2016 (Review extension approved at June meeting) Applicant: Chanhassen Shopes, LLC Consultant: Jae Vavrina, HR Green, Inc. Project: Chanhassen Chick-fil-a — Construction of a 4,775 square foot free-standing restaurant with associated parking lot and utilities. An underground detention system is proposed to provide storm water rate and quality control. Location: 445 West 791h Street, Chanhassen Reviewer: Adam Howard and Scott Sobiech, Barr Engineering Rules: Applicable rules checked Rule B: Floodplain Management Rule H: Appropriation of Public Waters X Rule C: Erosion and Sediment Control Rule I: Appropriation of Groundwater Rule D: Wetland and Creek Buffers X Rule 1: Stormwater Management Rule E: Dredging and Sediment Removal Rule K: Variances and Exceptions Rule F: Shoreline/Streambank Stabilization X Rule L: Permit Fees Rule G: Waterbody Crossings X Rule M: Financial Assurances Rule Conformance Summary Conforms to Rule Issue RBPCWD Comments C Erosion Control Plan Yes J Stormwater Rate Yes Management Volume Yes Water Quality Yes Low Floor Elev. Yes Maintenance See Comment See Rule Specific Permit Condition J1 L Permit Fee See Comment $1,500 was received on April 11, 2016 Additional $2,428 for excess cost recovery M Financial Assurance See Comment The financial assurance has been calculated at $73,400 Project Description The proposed redevelopment includes the construction of a 4,775 square foot free-standing restaurant with associated parking lot and utilities. An underground detention system is proposed to provide storm water rate and quality control. The project site information is summarized below: 1. Total Site Area: 1.32 acres 2. Existing Site Impervious Area: 0.87 acres (37,874 square feet) 3. New (Increase) in Site Impervious Area: 0.16 acres (6,754 square feet) (18% increase in site impervious area) 4. Disturbed Site Impervious Area: 0.87 acres (37,874 square feet) (100%of existing site impervious area disturbed) 5. Total Disturbed Area: 1.32 acres Exhibits: 1. Permit Application dated April 11, 2016. 2. Design Plans Sheets dated February 23, 2015 (revised July 5, 2016). 3. HydroCAD modeling (existing and proposed) dated March 17, 2016 (revised July 5, 2016) 4. WinSLAMM model files dated March 17, 2016 5. P8 Model files dated June 14, 2016 (revised July 5, 2016) 6. Drainage Area Figure dated February 23, 2016 7. Soil Boring Logs prepared by Giles Engineering Associates dated February 3, 2016. 8. Phase II assessment prepared by Giles Engineering Associates dated March 14, 2016 9. Stormwater restricted site memo dated June 14, 2016 (revised July 5, 2016) 10. Response to comments memo dated June 14, 2016 Rule Specific Permit Conditions Rule C: Erosion and Sediment Control Because the project will alter 1.32 acres (57,499 square feet) of surface area and excavate 980 cubic yards, the project must conform to the requirements in the RPBCWD Erosion and Sediment Control rule (Rule C, Subsection 2.1). The plans prepared by HR Green includes installation of silt fence and inlet protection for storm sewer catch basins, rock construction entrances, placement of a minimum of 6 inches of topsoil, decompaction of pervious areas compacted during construction, and retention of native topsoil onsite. The proposed project conforms to the erosion and sediment control requirements of Rule C. Rule J: Stormwater Management Because the project will alter 1.32 acres (57,499 square feet) of surface area and disturb more than 50% of the impervious surface of the site, the entire project site must meet the criteria of RPBCWD's Stormwater Management rule (Rule J, Subsections 2.1 and 2.3). The developer is proposing construction of an underground detention system to provide the rate control and water quality management on the site. Sump manholes will provide pretreatment for the underground detention system. Rate Control In order to meet the rate control criteria listed in Subsection 3.1.a, the 2-, 10-, and 100-year post development peak runoff rates must be equal to or less than the existing discharge rates at all locations where stormwater leaves the site. The applicant used a HydroCAD hydrologic model to simulate runoff rates for pre- and post - development conditions for the 2-, 10-, and 300-year frequency storm events using a nested rainfall distribution, and a 100-year frequency, 10-day snowmelt event. The existing and proposed 2-, 10-, and 100-year frequency discharges from the site are summarized in the table below. The project modeling indicates a 0.1 cfs increase in the peak discharge for the 100-yr, 10-yr, and 2-yr frequency storm events to W. 791h Street but an overall reduction in discharge from the entire site for these events. Because the modeled increase is within the margin of error for the computer model, the proposed project conforms to RPBCWD Rule J, Subsection 3.1.a. Volume Abstraction Subsections 3.1.b and 2.3 of Rule 1 requires the abstraction onsite of 1.1 inches of runoff from all the impervious surface of the parcel because more than 50% of the existing site impervious area is disturbed. An abstraction volume of 4,113 cubic feet is required from the 1.03 acres (44,867 square feet) of site impervious area on the project for volume retention. The following information was considered during the abstraction analysis: • Soil borings performed by Giles Engineering Associates show that soils in the project area are sandy/silty clays; the MN Stormwater Manual indicates an infiltration rate of 0.06 inches per Page 13 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327053\WorkFi1es\Task Orders\Permit Review\2016-014 Chanhassen Chick-fll-a\2016-014_Chanhassen Chick -%a 7-26- 16.dou hour for such soils. Soil borings show mottled soils which indicate the presence of seasonally high groundwater at the site. Seasonally high groundwater was also identified in a subsequent geotechnical report based on piezometers installed at the site. The high groundwater table is close enough to the surface to not allow for the necessary 3-ft separation distance from potential above ground infiltration basins. The high groundwater is present throughout the site, preventing relocation of the BMPs to another area. • The Phase I assessment indicated the presence of possible contaminated soils from the adjacent and nearby properties. The Phase II assessment indicates there is low level contamination in the groundwater. Infiltration of runoff through a BMP or irrigation has the potential to increase the movement of the existing contamination. Therefore, these abstraction methods are not available for this site. • The project site is located in the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). The MPCA Stormwater Manual suggests no infiltration if site is a potential stormwater hotspot, such as a gas station or contaminated site, to protect drinking water. Based on the findings of the Phase II assessment, the site is a potential stormwater hotspot. • The topography and land use of the site were evaluated to determine if stormwater could be routed to a shallow vegetated swale to provide abstraction. The large majority of the site drains to the southwest towards the MNDOT right-of-way. A very small portion drains to the north starting at a point just south of the West 79th Street right-of-way. The west side of the site ties into the existing shared paved access drive with no vegetated areas available to route stormwater through. The topography at the north side of the site does not allow for routing stormwater to the vegetated area as the west access drive grading needs to remain similar to the existing condition and the east access drive grading must connect to West 79th Street. Because of the need to tie into existing adjacent grades the site could not be raised to provide the required separation to groundwater. • Water reuse was considered as a source for the irrigation system; however, for the reason noted above regarding the poor subsurface soils, any areas within proximity to the parking lot would have to have an underdrain and be directed into the storm sewer system, thus providing no abstraction. Additionally, there is limited green space available for irrigation and the applicant is proposing a no mow fescue mix which requires minimal watering, thus reducing the abstraction provided by a reuse system. • The use of pervious pavement was reviewed to determine if it would be a feasible option for stormwater infiltration. The applicant's geotechnical engineer noted that the subsurface soils are moisture -sensitive and frost -susceptible which is supported by the supplied soil boring information. The introduction of additional water to these soils could cause them to lose strength due to the increase in moisture content unless underdrains are included in the design. The inclusion of underdrains would result in runoff being discharged from the site rather than I'ntLt I PAMPIs\23 MN\27\2327053\Workri1es\Task Orders\Permit Review\2016-014 Chanhassen Chick-fil-a\2016-014_Chanhassen Chick-fil-a 7-26- 16.doa abstracted on -site. The use of a pervious pavement is not feasible due to the soil characteristics listed above. • The Chick-fil-A building is not structurally designed to handle the additional loading of a green roof system and the amount of space available for a green roof is limited after the towers and roof top units are deducted. The Engineer concurs that soil information, shared driveway access with adjacent property, and high groundwater show that the abstraction standard in Subsection 3.1 of Rule 1 cannot practicably be met, the site is considered a restricted site and stormwater runoff volume must be managed in accordance with Subsection 3.3 of Rule J. For restricted sites, Subsection 3.3 of Rule J requires rate control in accordance with Subsection 3.1a and that abstraction and water quality protection be provided in accordance with the following sequence: (a)Abstraction of at least 0.55 inches of runoff from site impervious surface determined in accordance with paragraphs 2.3, 3.1 or 3.2, as applicable, and treatment of all runoff to the standard in paragraph 3.1c; or (b) Abstraction of runoff onsite to the maximum extent practicable and treatment of all runoff to the standard in paragraph 3.1c; or (c) Off -site abstraction and treatment in the watershed to the standards in paragraph 3.1b and 3.1c. Because of high groundwater, the presence of contaminated soils, and the site being located within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) the abstraction standard in Subsection 3.3a of Rule J cannot practicably be achieved. The Engineer concurs that because there is insufficient separation to the groundwater table, the potential to promote contamination movement, and limited roof space for a green roof the Applicant is unable to provide abstraction on the parcel and the proposed activity conforms to Rule J, Subsection 3.3b. Water Quality Management Subsection 3.1.c of Rule 1 requires the Applicant provide for at least 60 percent annual removal efficiency for total phosphorus (TP), and at least 90 percent annual removal efficiency for total suspended solids (TSS) from site runoff. The Applicant is proposing an underground detention system to achieve the required TP and TSS removals and sump manholes for pretreatment. A P8 water quality model was developed to estimate the TP and TSS removal capacity of the proposed BMP and is summarized in the table below. The engineer concurs with the modeling, and finds that the proposed project is in conformance with Rule J, Subsection 3.1.c. Page 1 5 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327053\WorkFiles\Task Orders\Permit Review\2016-014 Chanhassen Chick-fil-a\2016-014 Chanhassen Chick-fil-a 7-26- 16.dm Low floor Elevation No structure may be constructed or reconstructed such that its lowest floor elevation is less than 2 feet above the 100-year event flood elevation according to Rule 1, Subsection 3.6. The lowest elevation of the nearest building and the 100-year event flood elevation in the proposed underground system is summarized below. The RPBCWD Engineer concurs that the proposed project is in conformance with Rule 1, Subsection 3.6. Maintenance Subsection 3.7 of Rule 1 requires the submission of maintenance plan. All stormwater management structures and facilities must be designed for maintenance access and properly maintained in perpetuity to assure that they continue to function as designed. J1. Permit applicant must provide a draft maintenance and inspection declaration. Once approved by RPBCWD, the declaration must be recorded on the deed for the property and a stamped copy of the declaration provided to the RPBCWD after recordation. Rule L: Permit Fee: Fees for the project are: RuleC & J..........................................................................................................................................$1,500 The RPBCWD permit fee schedule adopted in December 2015 indicates that costs of site inspections, analysis of the proposed activities, services of consultants and compliance assurance in excess of $2,500 for properties between 0-4.99 acres will be charged to the permit applicant. The review of this permit application has resulted in $4,928 of consultant time. L1. In accordance with the adopted RPBCWD permit -fee schedule, because the engineer and legal time to review this permit exceeded $2,500 the applicant must submit an additional permit fee of $2,428 for excess cost recovery. Rule M: Financial Assurance: Rule C: Silt fence: 528 L.F. x $2.50/L.F. = .. $1,400 Restoration: 1.32 acres x $2,500/acre=........................ ..................................................... $3,300 Rule J: Detention: 7,758 sq. ft. x $6/sq. ft. =.................................................................................$46,600 Page 16 P:\MPIS\23 MN\27\2327053\WorkR1es\Task Orders\Permit Review\2016-014 Chanhassen Chick-hFa\2016-014_Chanhassen Chick-0l-a 7-26- 16.doa Contingency(10%)............................................................................................................................$5,100 Administration(30%)...................................................................................................................... $17,000 Total Financial Assurance................................................................................................................$73,400 Applicable General Requirements: 1. The RPBCWD Administrator shall be notified at least three days prior to commencement of work. 2. Construction shall be consistent with the plans and specifications approved by the District as a part of the permitting process. The date of the approved plans and specifications is listed on the permit. 3. The applicant must provide the name and contact information of general contractor responsible for the site. Findings 1. The proposed project includes the information necessary, plan sheets and erosion control plan for review. 2. The proposed project conforms to Rule C. 3. The proposed project will conform to Rules J and L if the Rule Specific Permit Conditions listed above are met. Recommendation: Approval, contingent upon: 1. Continued compliance with General Requirements. 2. Financial Assurance in the amount of $73,400 3. Receipt in recordation of a maintenance declaration for the stormwater management facilities. A draft must be approved by the District prior to recordation. 4. Compliance with rule -specific permit conditions, including receipt of an additional permit fee of $2,428 for excess cost recovery. By accepting the permit, when issued, the applicant agrees to the following stipulations: 1. Per Rule J Subsection 4.5, upon completion of the site work, the permittee must submit as -built drawings demonstrating that at the time of final stabilization, stormwater facilities conform to design specifications as approved by the District. Page 1 7 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327053\WorkFiles\Task Orders\Permit Review\2016-014 Chanhassen Chick-fiFa\2016-014 Chanhassen Chick-fil-a 7-26- 16.dm Board Action It was moved by Manager seconded by Manager to approve permit application No. 2016-014 with the conditions recommended by staff. I'n�F ; c PAMPIs\23 MN\27\2327053\WorkFi1es\Task Orders\Permit Review\2016-014 Chanhassen Chick-fil-a\2016-014_Chanhassen Chick-(l-a 7-26- 16.doac a�� -. I•.. • • r ♦ ram_ 7• l iy m ra tr ♦Lrj �- l� Del R,e Dr1!2'� '�•�, �I Sxa49 4r AZ. e`> /at♦ as n �.•y. I a• X L 1JI lYJ V � �S�.L r j �til II F.. �'r p 1'•. ..i: �' 10, r _ Ay r 1 � •• ' - ' •. e`•' 1 Fed ��:� r • y" ago Mdb hake Or E,. - e� �. �/ . S /• �; _. '_ � '�:: i l t ♦� ♦.1• • _ ....e- • I • llt ' ------------------------ ^.. WEST 79TH STREET n..wv .r..�«. it ...m wi...n-n...,x..... 1 9 Y Y Y Y 1 Pj STATE TRHNN HIGHWAY NO. S wu .11..11. ITT_ r muuu naw i�i w[nr um wm. HRGreen ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS CHICK-FIL-A, CHANHASSEN, MN Chick-ffl-A-Chanhassen, MN PREPARED BY: HR Green, Inc. JOB NUMBER: 86150413 DATE: 06114116 ITEM# DESCRIPTION UNITS UNIT COST QUANTITY COST EROSION CONTROL 1 SILT FENCE LF $ 4.D0 369 $ 1,476.00 2 INLET PROTECTION EA $ 300.00 7 $ 2,100.00 3 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA $ 3.500.00 1 $ 3,500.00 4 CONCRETE WASHOUT EA $ 1,000.00 1 $ 1,000.00 EROSION CONTROL TOTAL $ 8,076.00 LANDSCAPE 8 SITE RESTORATION 5 APPLE SERVICEBERRY EA $ 400.00 6 $ 2.400.00 6 PAPER BIRCH EA $ 450.00 3 $ 1,350.00 7 GINKGO EA $ 550.00 8 $ 4,400.00 8 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST EA $ 550.00 3 $ 1,650.00 9 CRIMSON SPIRE OAK EA $ 650.00 6 $ 3,900.00 10 DWARF BURNING BUSH EA $ 65.00 38 $ 2,470.00 11 INCREDIBALL HYDRANGEA EA $ 65.00 23 $ 1,495.00 12 FRAGRANT SUMAC EA $ 65.00 106 $ 6,890.00 13 SPIREA EA $ 65.00 54 $ 3,510.00 14 JUNIPER EA $ 65.00 53 $ 3,445.00 15 DWARF MOUNTAIN PINE EA $ 65.00 23 $ 1,495.00 16 TECHNITO ARBORVITAE EA $ 65.00 12 $ 780.00 17 LESSER CALAMINT EA $ 18.75 141 $ 2,643.75 18 DAYLILY EA $ 18.75 120 $ 2,250.00 19 DAYLILV EA $ 18.75 117 $ 2,193.75 20 HOSTA EA $ 18.75 47 $ 881.25 21 FOUNTAIN GRASS EA $ 22.50 58 1 $ 1,305.00 22 BLUE SWITCH GRASS EA $ 22.50 55 $ 1,237.50 23 SOD SV I $ 5.00 979 $ 4,895.00 24 MULCH CV $ 75.00 59 $ 4,425.00 25 ROCK CY $ 120.00 5 $ 600,00 LANDSCAPE 8 SITE RESTORATION TOTAL $ 54,216.25 TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS $ 62,292.25 Project Assumpeorm/NoteelCommeMs HRG u not a mnsuwction am ..an,, u.nothation conw n,r. my should HRGS rendering an opmon of "th, wostrwvim coati k atnsiJered cyubalem to Ile nature aM event of uniav a wnmrwtion a e umaha m o,mm�to in,,,.actor would pr-nu, HRG'S opnim will h t -eJ wklY upon M1is nr her,wn e[perieme wiN mnsuwiMn. Ttds requires HRG to make anu.Mr of aaumgxms asa s,mal oomuhons that will le emnunrered on saw. le s,,ccalk 1mamorsofouncr design professionals engaged: the manna and metMtls of aomusuction IM contractor will chants, fla, a a cmenl of lahrt. ia,m mem and mamruls Nc contractor .ill empk, am Vachui tech na,uns in akmemining pia and marYl auditions at thv time. a oNvr fanon owr which HRG has mml. Grwn flu,amumpuomwLkh mum Is, mada e. HRG parmucc the au— of his ,it M1er options of ant andin rcaogniulm of that fact Na CLIP3 wmn anydam agaicum HRG Native ro the aawacy of HRGS opinion of pmlmu, aanouction aoa GO HRGreen ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS CHICK-FIL-A, CHANHASSEN, MN Chick{II-AChenhassen, MN PREPARED BY: HR Green, Inc. JOB NUMBER: 86160413 DATE: 07120116 ITEMS DESCRIPTION UNITS UNITCOST QUANTITY1 COST STORM SEWER 1 4'DIA. MANHOLE EA $ 2, 500M 1 $ 2.MMO3 2 5' DIA MANHOLE CONNECT ONLINE OF EXIST. STORM SEWER EA $ 3,500.D0 1 $ 3,500.00 3 2' DIA. CATCH BASIN EA $ 1,5W.00 2 $ 3,000.W 4 2.25' DIA. MnDOT CATCH BASIN EA $ 2,000.00 3 $ EDD0.00 5 4' DIA. CATCH BASIN EA $ 2,5()OW 2 $ 5,DD0.00 6 15"NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN EA $ 1.000.00 1 $ 1,ODOAO 7 R4906-C TRENCH DRAIN LF $ 120AD 246 $ 29,5W.00 8 12"RCP STORM SEWER LF $ 30AD 148 $ 4,440.00 9 15"RCP STORM SEWER LF $ 3500 77 S 2,69&00 10 12"CMP STORM SEWER LF $ 30,00 25 $ 75O0W 11 12HADS N-12 WT STORM SEWER LF $ 35.DO 79 $ 2,730.00 12 6" PVC STORM SEWER LF $ 20.00 3 $ 60.OD 13 B'PVC STORM SEWER LF $ 25W 254 $ 63WA0 14 10' PVC STORM SEWER LF $ 30,00 86 $ 2,590,00 15 12'CMP FES EA $ 1,00OW 2 $ 2,000.W 16 15 RCP FES W/GRATE EA $ 1.500.00 2 $ 3,OOO.00 17 PVC CLEANOUT EA $ 200.00 3 $ 600.00 18 TRENCH BACKFILL CY $ 30W 171 $ 5,130.00 19 STORMTRAP DETENTION SYSTEM LSUM $ W5,OW.00 $ 305,000.00 STORM SEWER TOTAL $ $86,866A0 EROSION CONTROL 20 SILT FENCE LF $ 4.00 3$ 1,476.00 21 INLET PROTECTION EA $ 300.00 14$ 1,200.00 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA $ 3.500.00 $ 3,5XIbD 23 CONCRETE WASHOUT EA $ 1,000D0 $ 1.000,OD EROSION CONTROL TOTAL IS 7,176.08 LANDSCAPE 6 SITE RESTORATION 24 APPLE SERVICEBERRY EA $ 400A0 6 $ 2.400,00 25 IPAPER BIRCH EA $ 450.00 3 $ 1,350.00 26 GINKGO EA $ 55DW 8 $ 4.400.00 27 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST EA $ 550.00 3 $ 1.650.00 28 CRIMSON SPIRE OAK EA $ 6WA0 6 $ 3,900A0 29 DWARF BURNING BUSH EA $ 6500 38 $ 2,470.W 30 INCREDIBALL HYDRANGEA EA $ 6&W 23 S 1,495A0 31 FRAGRANT SUMAC EA $ 65.00 IDS $ 6.890.00 32 SPIREA EA $ 6500 54 $ 3.510A0 33 JUNIPER EA $ 65M 53 $ 3.445.00 34 DWARF MOUNTAIN PINE EA $ 65.00 23 $ 1,495.W 35 TECHNITO ARBORVITAE EA $ 65.DO /2 S 780A0 36 LESSER CALAMINT EA $ 18.75 141 $ Z643.75 37 JDAYLILY EA $ 18.75 120 S 2.250 W 38 DAYLILY EA $ 1875 117 $ 2,193.75 39 HOSTA EA $ 18,75 47 $ 88125 40 FOUNTAIN GRASS EA $ 2ZW 5B $ 1,305.00 41 BLUE SNATCH GRASS EA $ 22,50 55 $ 1,237.51) 42 SOD SY $ 500 979 $ 4,995.00 43 MULCH CY $ 75A0 59 $ 4,425A0 44 ROCK CY S 120 W 5 5 600.00 LANDSCAPE $ SITE RESTORATION TOTAL $ 54,216.25 TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS $ M7tR4771E `' ^v_o 46o ers.oD I'i � Z�% • LS Project AssulnpWnslNOUWCOm nLL: IMI:— nry a mm=,rvnim ..el.stimelm nr wrvvuum .�m�ran.�,. ivn 4-11 H.; I... F'n �Tm��m .1 A•MaM. muswa�no nrvu M a�mail.,N Numkel v. N. nemre W mW of nov m.•Itll¢a�fe. Hkl�S y.nrohllh�aW n.I.Furym.lu erGerwneyarvmFviWmo<wmm Trv•rynim l6lGn�.he uv.A ote,r xual wmiMxm+Wur:Y..—nu..a.J �mau..,vl•.��.J�.J,nu.m of rlM1er JF.nlan�mN•n�lufael vuWM Hwalmim LL. ®Yeu Y rY Jrc mJ !h .gory d4,M ill N:. 9... ^mh Fr„m mJ mvkID-na�hdw nl ih �,mJ nhvf IIN M1 lu IOU" . t noel ol. Nml. mJm —F^rwm .I,Fu fen Yu <114M Generous, Bob From: Hertel, Erik <ehertel@hrgreen.com> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 2:25 PM To: Generous, Bob Cc: Dobrosavljevic, Milan; Vavrina, Joseph; Richards, Todd Subject: RE: Chick-fil-A - Chanhassen Attachments: CFA - Chanhassen Area Boundary.pdf Good afternoon Bob, I have included the hard cover calculations for the consolidated CFA property in the existing and proposed conditions below. I have also attached a redline sketch which delineates the area these calculations were based off of. r L 1 S m CFA Property Area: 57,588 sq. ft. 1 . % N v P. " Existing Impervious Area: 37,874 sq. ft. Proposed Impervious Area: 44,628 sq. ft. t77.S% C 0 1 37 Please let me know if you would like these calculations broken up any further Thank you, ERIK HERTEL, EIT Staff Engineer HR GREEN. INC. The contents of this transmission and any attachments are confidential and intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the ® I reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. HRGreen ---- _-—------ From: Dobrosavljevic, Milan Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 1:36 PM To: Hertel, Erik; Richards, Todd Cc: Vavrina, Joseph Subject: FW: Chick-fil-A - Chanhassen Just so I don't provide contradictory information than what we show on our engineering plans, please send Bob the area calculation of the "hard cover' for the overall CFA property existing and proposed. Should be relatively easy since the additional tract is all unpaved. MILAN DOBROSAVWEVIC, PLS HR GREEN, INC. The contents of this transmission and any attachments are confidential and intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the ® I reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. HRGreen — — From: Generous, Bob fmailto:baenerousCd)ci.chanhassen.mn.usl Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 1:29 PM ~\ WOO '] \) .\\ 7 � vm� � �f - � * * � ---�- O2� To: Dobrosavljevic, Milan Subject: RE: Chick-fil-A - Chanhassen Just the CFA property From: Dobrosavljevic, Milan[mailto:mdobrosavlievic@hrgreen.coml Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 11:53 AM To: Generous, Bob Cc: Vavrina, Joseph Subject: RE: Chick-fil-A - Chanhassen Hello Bob, Just to clarify within your email below, for the entire site do you mean the Holiday Station, Chanhassen Inn, and proposed CFA Tract (AKA Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition)? Are there other tracts we should be including for our impervious area calculations? Thanks, ^.• F �� .� Vff14 i MILAN DOBROSAVUEVIC, PLS HR GREEN, INC. The contents of this transmission and any attachments are confidential and intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. HRGreen I ----- — --- From: Vavrina, Joseph Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 11:32 AM To: Dobrosavljevic, Milan Subject: Fwd: Chick-fil-A - Chanhassen Joe Vavrina HR Green Cl Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphow -------- Original message -------- From: "Generous, Bob"<bgenerous(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: 24/03/2016 10:47 AM (GMT-06:00) To: "Vavrina, Joseph" <ivavrina(a),hr¢reen.com> Subject: Chick-fil-A - Chanhassen Joe, Do you have the existing hardcover for the entire site and then for lot 2 block S Zamor Addition? Bob PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following two tracts: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating; and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208E on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. 3/16/20164:40 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CNANHASSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: Agency Review Response Deadline: Date Application Filed: March 22, 2016 Aril 7, 2016 March 18, 2016 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Robert Generous, AICP 952-227-1131 bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60-Day Review Period Deadline: April 19, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. May 9, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. May 17, 2016 Application: Request for Site Plan Review with Variances to construct a 4,775 square -foot restaurant on 1.32 acres of property zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH) and located at 445 West 79th Street — Chick-fil-A. Applicant: Chick-fil-A Inc. Owner: Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. Planning Case: 2016-08 1 Web Page: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-08 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Attorney ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Chaska ® Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ❑ Eden Prairie ® Engineer ❑ Jackson Township ® Fire Marshal Watershed Districts: ❑ Minnetonka ® Forester ❑ Carver County WMO ❑ Shorewood ® Park Director ❑ Victoria ® Water Resources ❑ Lower MN River ❑ Minnehaha Creek ❑ Law Enforcement Adjacent Counties: ® Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Carver County Agencies: ❑ HennepinUtilities: ❑ Scott ❑ Community Development ® Cable TV — Mediacom School Districts: ❑ Engineer ❑ Environmental ❑ Electric — Minnesota Valley Services ❑ Historical Society ® Electric — Xcel Energy ❑ Eastern Carver County 112 El Parks ❑ Magellan Pipeline ❑ Minnetonka 276 [I soil &Water Conservation District ® Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy ® Phone — CenturyLink Other Agencies: State Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad ❑ Board of Water & Soil Resources Authority ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum El Health ❑ Historical Society ❑ Sol El TC&W Railroad ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ® Transportation D.�ANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO.2016-08 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, April 19, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Site Plan Review with Variances to construct a 4,775 square -foot restaurant on 1.32 acres of property zoned Highway and Business Services District (BH) and located at 445 West 79`h Street — Chick-fil-A. Applicant: Chick-fil-A hic. Owner: Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-08 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Bob Generous, AICP, Senior Planner Email: bgenemus(a,ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on April 7, 2016) SCANNED Cwlw-rl�— A THE AVELIN GROUP ENVIRONI✓ENM ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS October 15, 2015 Mr. Randy Schold 8925 Twin Iakes Crossing Eden Prairie, MN 55347 RE: Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 195 791s Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 Project #2015-P0135-0025 Dear Mr. Scholl ,1TYOFCHANHAg;Ep RECEIVE!) OCT 16 2015 r-1I"ASa NPIANNINGO)ppr The Javelin Group, Inc. Qavelin) has conducted a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Phase II ESA) for the vacant parcel located at 195 796s Street W in the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. The attached Figure 1 contains a site location map. The completed scope of work was based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) guidance documents. INTRODUCTION The Phase Il ESA was proposed to further assess the extent and magnitude of a release from former petroleum underground storage tanks (USTs) on the site and to assess the quality of surface fill. A geotechnical boring (SB-3) near the former site UST basin encountered a sandy fill with concrete pieces to a depth of 24 feet, groundwater at 20' and a petroleum odor from 20-26 feet A soil sample from a depth of 20 feet was submitted for laboratory analysis of diesel range organic compounds (DRO) that was detected at a concentration of 492 mg/kg. This is less than the 100 mg/kg MPCA action limit for UST excavations. A copy of the analytical report is attached. The attached Figure 2 shows the location of the geotechnical boring (SB- #) and the estimated locations of a former site redi-mix concrete plant and tanks. SCOPE OF WOR% Javelin proposed the following scope of work to assess the potential for a release: ❑ Clear public utilities using the Gopher One -Call system and evaluate proposed probe locations for private utilities using a private utility locator. ❑ Advance two (2) soil probes (GP-1 and GP-2) to a depth of 25 feet at locations near the former USTs (GP-1) and at the location of a proposed building on the site (GP-2). The boring locations are shown on the attached Figure 2. ❑ Field screen soil samples from the soil borings at 2-foot intervals for total organic vapors using a photoionization detector (PID), and document any unusual soil discoloration, staining, or odors. ❑ Visually and manually field classify the soil types encountered in the soil borings. ❑ Collect one (1) soil sample at a depth of 1.5 feet from each soil boring for laboratory analysis of diesel range organic compounds (DRO), gasoline range organic compounds, benzene, toluene, THE JAVELdN GROUP, INC. 10125CROSSTOWN CIRCLE —SUITE 107—EDENPRAHUF MN 55344 SCANNED TE-- 952 380-3668 FAY: 952380-3669 10/15/2015 Ted Pha$e II ESA Page 2 of 7 Javelin Project Number. 2015-PO122-0024 Chanhassen, MN ethylbenzene, and xylenes (GRO/BTEX), polynuciear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and RCRA metals. ❑ Collect one groundwater sample from each probe location for laboratory analysis of GRO/BTEX and DRO. If groundwater is not encountered, collect a soil sample at the termination depth for analysis of the same parameters. ❑ Advance two (2) soil vapor probes (SV-1 and SV-2) to a depth of 4 feet at locations adjacent to the soil probes for collection of soil vapor samples for laboratory analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using EPA Method TO-15. SCOPE OF WORK DEVIATIONS Groundwater was not encountered at either of the GP-1 or GP-2 probe locations so soil samples were collected for analysis of DRO and GRO/BTEX at depths of 21' and 23" respectively. Soil boring GP-1 encountered refusal at 22 feet so it was not advanced to the proposed 25 foot depth. FIELD ACTIVITIES On August 3, 2015, JAVELIN environmental scientist Brad Cordova oversaw the advancement of the soil botings by Range Environmental Drilling. Soil borings were advanced at the location shown on the attached Figure 2 and as described in Table 1. TABLE L• SUMMARY OF SOIL PROBE LOCATIONS SOILPROBE DEPM SAMPLEDEP37H PURPOSE MEDIA GP-1 21' 1.5' & 21' Former UST area Soil GP-2 23' 1.5' & 23' Proposed budding SW comet Soil SV-1 4' 4' Former UST area Soil Vapor SV-2 4' 4' Proposed building SW comer Soil Vapor The soil encountered in the probes advanced at the subject property was typically comprised of 2 feet of topsoil underlain by black sandy lean clay to the termination depth. Soil samples were classified and examined for staining and odors by the Javelin environmental technician. Boring GP-2 encountered a swampy odor from 10 -14'. Elevated organic vapors were not detected at concentrations exceeding 1 ppm in the soil samples collected at either soil probe location, with the exception of minor detections of up to 1.2 ppm at the 14'-16' depth of GP-2. Organic vapor concentrations of less than 10 ppm are not generally considered a concern for petroleum releases. Groundwater was not encountered at either soil probe location. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION SOIL PROBE SOIL SAMPLING The soil probes were advanced utilizing a truck -mounted hydraulic push probe unit Continuous soil samples were collected from the ground surface to the temmation depths of 22 feet in GP-1 and 24 feet in GP-2. Soil samples were collected by advancing a 2-inch diameter by 4-foot long hollow steel sampling tube into the subsurface with a hydraulic hammer. The open-ended sampling tube was equipped with a disposable acetate liner, which was removed from the sampler after each soil core was retrieved. Probe rods and sampling equipment were decontaminated prior to arrival on -site. THE FAVELIN GROUP REALEgrAM DUEDQIGFNCF 10/15/2015 Lamited Phase II ESA Page 3 of 7 Javelin Project Number. 2015-PO122-0024 Chanhassen, MN Soil samples were visually and manually classified in the field in accordance with ASTM D2488. If detected, soil discoloration and odors were noted. Soil samples were also screened for the presence of total organic vapors utilizing the polyethylene bag headspace procedure and a PID calibrated to an isobutylene reference gas standard. The soil samples collected from the soil probes were placed in laboratory supplied glass containers, stored in a cooler on ice and submitted to Pace Analytical for laboratory analyses using proper chain -of -custody procedures. SOIL VAPOR SAMPLING Two (2) soil vapor probes were advanced at locations SV-1 and SV-2. A soil vapor sample was collected by advancing a soil gas sampling probe tip to a depth of 4-feet and retracting it to deploy the soil gas sampling screen. Dedicated polyethylene tubing was then extended down inside the probe rod and connected to a fitting on the soil gas sampling probe tip. The annular space around the probe was sealed with bentonite at the surface to prevent ambient air from diluting the sample. Prior to collecting a sample, a minimum of two (2) tubing volumes were purged using a syringe. An in- ure moisture/sediment trap was attached and a second length of dedicated tubing was used to connect the moisture trap to a Summa canister in which the air was evacuated to generate a vacuum within the canister. The canister identification tag was labeled with the sample identification number, the vacuum gage reading, the date, and the sample collection time. Sample collection was initiated by opening the valve on the vacuum canister to allow the air sample to be drawn into the canister. After filling, the canister valve was dosed, the airtight cap replaced, and the identification tag attached to the canister was labeled with the ending time and vacuum gage reading. The filled canister was transported using proper chamof-custody procedures to the laboratory for analysis of VOCs using EPA Method TO 15. LABORATORY RESULTS/DISCUSSION SOIL ANALYITCAL RESULTS Sort analytical results were compared to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) Residential Soil Reference Values (SRVs) and Soil Leaching Values (SLVs). The soil analytical results are s»mmaned in Table 2 below and the complete laboratory analytical report is attached. ❑ DIESEL RANGE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (DRO): DRO was detected at concentrations ranging from 11.6 mg/kg to 29.9 mg/kg in soil samples collected from the 1.5' and 21'-23' depth in GP-1 and GP-Z The MPCA does not have SRVs or SLVs for DRO, but a concentration of 100 nVkg is used as the action limit for UST excavations and soil with a concentration of less than 100 ppm meets the DRO criterion for reuse as unregulated fill. ❑ GASOLINE RANGE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GRO): GRO was not detected at concentrations exceeding the laboratory reporting limits in the soil samples collected with the exception of the 23-foot sample collected from boring GP-2 that had a GRO concentration of 30.2 mg/kg. The MPCA does not have SRVs or SLVs for GRO, but a concentration of 100 mg/kg is used as the action limit for UST excavations and soil with a concentration of less than 100 ppm meets the GRO criterion for reuse as unregulated fill. ❑ BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE, AND XYLENEs (BTEX): No petroleum BTEX compounds were detected at concentrations exceeding the laboratory reporting limits in the four (4) soil samples analyzed. ❑ POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHs): No PAH compounds were detected at concentrations exceeding the laboratory reporting limits in the soil sample collected from the 1.5 THE FAVELIN GROUP 10/15/2015 L rated Phase H ESA Page 4 of 7 Javelin Project Number. 2015-P0122-0024 Chanbacsen,MN foot depth in GP-2. Naturally occurring PAHs were detected at concentrations ranging from 0.01-0.13 mg/kg that were significantly less than their associated residential SRV and SLV criteria - The PAH concentrations detected appear to represent background concentrations. ❑ RCRA METALS: Low concentrations of naturally occurring metals were detected in both soil samples analyzed from GP-1 and GP-2 at the 1.5-foot depth. The metals concentrations detected did not exceed the residential SLVs of SRVs. The metals concentrations detected appear to represent background concentrations. A summary of the metals detections is provided in the following Table 2. TABLE 2: SOIL METALS ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY PAR DHP1I3 UNM GP-1 GP-2 RESIDE TuL SLVs REsmEmIAL SRVs L5' 21' L5' 23' Arsenic 5.7 4.9 1 5.8 9 Barium 100 70.9 1 1700 1100 Chromium M09 12.5 112 Lead 9.4 81 2700 300 0.031 0.026 1 3.3 05 DRO 26 19.4 29.9 11.6 GRO <10.7 <13.9 <11.8 30.2 Acertath 0.0158 <0.0111 Anthracene 0.0117 <0.0111 1300 7880 Benzo a anthvicene 0.0644 <0.0111 Benzo a e 0.0721 <0.0111 1.4 2 Benzo 0.0447 <0.0111 Benzo fluoranthene 0.129 <0.0111 0.0631 <0.0111 Dibenz ah anthraceue 0.0119 <0.0111 bLroranthene 0.108 <0.0111 670 1080 Indeno(lA3Apyrene 1119N 0.0391 <0.0111 Phenanthrene 0.0294 <0.0111 0.0928 <0.0]ll 440 890 BaP 0.103 <0.0111 1.4 2 SOIL. VAPOR ANALYTICAL RESULTS Soil vapor analytical results were compared to the MPCA residential intrusion screening values (ISVs), which are compound specific inhalation risk screening values for volatile compounds. The ISVs are designed to be used for screening inhalation risks to indoor air via the vapor intrusion pathway. Multiples of the ISVs, specifically ten times the ISV (10x-ISV), are used as screening values for subsurface soil vapors. Soil vapor concentrations less than 10x their respective LSV concentration represent a relatively low risk and typically, no further evaluation for vapor intrusion is necessary. The soil vapor probe analytical detections are summarized in Table 3 below, and the laboratory analytical report is attached. A total of 23 VOC compounds were reported in the soil vapor samples at concentrations exceeding the laboratory detection limits (reporting limits). No VOCs were detected in the soil vapor samples at concentrations exceeding the residential 10x-ISVs. The compounds detected are indicative of a minor release of petroleum and chlorinated solvents. Ethanol was also detected in the soil vapor samples. THE 0 AVELIN GROUP REAL EMMDUE DILIGINC. 10/15/2015 Page 5 of 7 Limited Phase 11 ESA Javelin Project Number. 2015-P0122-0024 Chanhassen, MN TABLE 3: SOIL VAPOR ANALYTICAL DETECTIONS SUMMARY PARAMETER UNris SV-1(4) SV-2 (4) MPCA RESIDENTIAL lox-ISV Acetone µg/m' 99.2 100 310,000 Benzene m' 10.3 9.0 45 ne m' 36.8 36.1 50,000 isulfide m' 11.6 48.4 7,000 m m' 24.6 11.4 1,000 ane o m' <122 42 60,000 chlomethene µg/m' 25 <1.5 600 pg/m' 253 408 150,000 zeoe pg/m' 3.7 4.6 10,000 n-Heptene µg/m' 427 63 NE n-Hexanea µg/m' 15-5 9.6 20,000 2-Hexanoneµg/m' <1.4 3.0 NE Methylene Chloridpg/m' <6.1 13.9 200 4-Methyl-2-pentanµg/m' 1.7 22 3,0000 Naphthaleneµg/m' 5.1 5.0 90 2-Propmol pg/m' <22. 15.1 70,000 Propylene µg/m' 71.1 51.4 30,000 Tetrachlomethene µg/m' 10.1 72 20 Tetrahydrofuran pg/m' <1.0 23 NE Toluene µg/m' 37.7 35.4 5,0000 Trichlorcethene µg/m' 3.1 <0.99 20 1,2,4-Trimedrylbeozeoe µg/m' 4.1 42 70 Xylenes µg/m' 129 1 13.4 1,000 Notes: NE = Not Established CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions were determined, based on the results of this limited Phase II ESA. RELEASES ASSOCIATED WITH FORMER UNDER ROUND STORAGE TANBS ❑ Geotechnical boring SB-3 was the only boring to encounter a sandy fill The sandy fill was encountered from the surface to a depth of 24 feet, and was underlain by sandy clay that was predominately encountered in the remaining geotechnical borings and in GP-1 and GP-2 advanced for the Phase II ESA. It appears SB-3 was advanced in the former tank basin that was backfilled with sand to create a bathtub effect in the surrounding clay soil Precipitation would percolate into the sand fill and be held in by the surrounding clay soil creating a limited accumulation of perched groundwater in the backfilled tank basin at a depth of 20 feet The residual soil DRO concentration in the tank basin where the soil with an odor was detected (19'- 24� was only 49.2 mg/kg, which does not exceed the 100 mg/kg action limit for UST excavations. ❑ Phase II ESA boring GP-1 was apparently advanced just outside the former UST basin The soil sample from the 21-foot depth had a DRO concentration of 19.4 mg/kg that is also less than the 100 mg/kg excavation action limit THE 0 AVELIN GROUP REAL. FSrAlE DUE D111GE 24M 10/ 15/2015 Limited Phase II ESA Page 6 of 7 Javelin Project Number. 2015-POI22-0024 Chanhassen, MN ❑ The remaining DRO and GRO detections were at concentrations less than those detected in and near the tank basin, and no BTEX compounds were detected in any of the soil samples so it does not appear that any further investigation is needed pertaining to the former UST release at the subject property. The petroleum concentrations detected would not require special handling and the soil meets the DRO and GRO criterion for reuse as unregulated fill. SURFACE FILL QUALITY ❑ Since soil samples were being collected on the subject property to investigate the former petroleum release, it was decided to collect two samples of the surface fill soil to verify that it meets the criterion for reuse as unregulated fill. Soil samples from the 1.5 foot in GP-1 and GP-2 were collected for laboratory analysis of DRO, GRO/BTEX, PAHs, and RCRA metals. The DRO concentrations detected were 26 mg/kg and 29.9 mg/kg, compared to the unregulated fill criterion of 100 mg/kg. GRO/BTEX compounds were not detected and the PAH and metals concentrations appeared to be representative of background concentrations that also did not exceed the criteria for reuse as unregulated fill VAPOR INTRUSION EVALUATION ❑ Soil vapor samples were collected at two locations to test for the presence of volatile organic compounds in the soil vapor that could pose a potential vapor intension concern. Laboratory analysis of the soil vapor samples detected low concentrations of several VOC compounds. However, none of the VOC compounds were detected at concentrations exceeding the residential lOx ISVs. Based on this information, there appears to be a low risk of vapor intrusion risks in JAVE.LIN's opinion. RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ Based on the results of this limited phase II environmental investigation, no further investigation regarding the former onsite USTs appears warranted, since the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) site has already been dosed by the MPCA. ❑ The MPCA closure letter for the LUST site indicates that residual petroleum contamination remains. Based upon this information, the use of stormwater infiltration structures is not recommended ❑ In the event that potential unforeseen impacts are encountered during future site redevelopment, samples should be collected to assess proper soil handling and management options. STANDARD OF CARE The opinions and conclusions submitted in this report are based on our field observations and the review of laboratory analytical results of soil and soil vapor samples collected from the soil probes completed for this investigation. The services performed by Javelin on this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable members of the profession, practicing in the same locality, under similar budget and time constraints. No other warranty is expressed or intended This investigation report was prepared exclusively for the use or benefit of those listed on the cover page of this report Reliance or use by any other third party without explicit written authorization from Javelin will be at the third party's own risk. No warranties or representations, expressed or implied, are made to any such third party. THE VAVELIN GROUP REALMATEDUEDUGENM 10/15/2015 Page 7 of 7 Lamited Phase II ESA Javelin Project Number. 2015-PO122-0024 Chanhassen, MN We appreciate the opportunity to provide this service. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us at952-380-3668. THE JAVELIN GROUP, INC. K{,u(441 Kevin Pierson, M.S. Senior Environmental Professional John E. Findley, M.S. Principal Environmental Professional THE �AVELIN GROUP REAL ESTATE DUE Dn1GENCF �T� fir-' �� ,• .. �� tL .� Y - � i s y ', `100 11 - a( of ; t�'�'�'�` AC - aim.--.•- M` i , ``q1.. A �`. ei • s,j - -•. 1K SUBJECT f s % ti ■ 1� PROPERTY •bra _ ., ,, , ■� _ _ _ _ ap •► :s-aWi-lt".'t a• _ems--� 'r, leiBIG PROJECT NAME: FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION VACANT PARCEL MAP 195 75m STREET W PROJECT # THE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 MAVELIN 2015-P0122-0024 GROUP CR6M1TIM6 SUBJECT PROPERTY PPP Former I 1 Former UST AST Former Redl-10ix %,Proposed r "snt Building PROJECT NAME: VACANT PARCEL 195 79TH STREET W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 N FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN PROJECT # THE 2015-P0122-0024 WGR UN GROUP EE.LL CRT Oli DNGEH(2 ClWa1i1.�T5 SOIL BORING LOG VACANT PARCEL 195 79TM STREET W CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Javelin Project No.2015-P0122-0024 No./ BoringLifpt� Date ple Recovery (inches) Soil Description PID Result (VIYMv 0-2 Gray/black topsoil sandy lean CLAY, dry stiff, no odors or staining <1 30 2-4 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff no odors or staining <1 4-6 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 20 6-8 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff no odors or staining <1 8 —10 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff no odors or staining <1 40 GP-1 10 - 12 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, swamp odor, no staining 1.2 8/3/15 12 —14 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, swamp odor, no staining 1.1 32 14 - 16 Gray sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 16 - 18 Gray sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 46 18 - 20 Gray sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 20 — 22 24 Gray sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 Refusal at 22' End of Boring PID = Photoionization detector, ppmv = parts per million by volume Note: Calibrated Mini Rae PID with isobutylene gas (100 ppmv) prior to field screening Driller — Range Environmental Drilling, Geoprobe Groundwater —Not Encountered Completion Time: 1250 THE AV ELIN GROUP �&11. ffiIAIE DUH DDIG@i� CAN5111.TAi115 SOIL BORING LOG VACANT PARCEL 195 79rH STREET W CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA —pie Javelin Project No.2015-PO122-0024 Boring No./ Date Sam Depth fr Recovery (inches) Soil Description PID Result jpmy 0-2 Gray/tan topsoil sandy lean CLAY, dry stiff, no odors or staining <1 40 2-4 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, dry, stiff, no odors or staining <1 4-6 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 36 6-8 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 8 —10 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 28 10 - 12 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 GP-2 8/3/15 12 —14 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 30 14 - 16 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 16 - 18 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 40 18 - 20 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 20 — 22 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 20 22 - 24 Black sandy lean CLAY with a few rocks, moist, stiff, no odors or staining <1 PID = Photoionization detector, ppmv = parts per million by volume Note: Calibrated Mini Rae PID with isobutylene gas (100 ppmv) prior to field screening Driller — Range Environmental Drilling, Geoprobe Groundwater — Not Encountered Completion Time: 1415 IAXIEN LI GROUP ABM. RL�iE DDB DDfD@i� CONIOLiANIS ��PaceAn*ical rwxpecakbsmn 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 May 18, 2015 Kevin Pierson The Javelin Group 10125 Crosstown Circle Suite 107 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 Dear Kevin Pierson: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on May 11, 2015. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, KaborXiong kabor.xiong@pacelabs.com Project Manager Enclosures REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. without the written consent of Pace Ana"cal Services, Inc.. Page 1 of 13 /- ceAnalytical www.pacelabs.com 1 I 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 Minnesota Certification IDs 1700 Elm Street SE Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55414 A21-A Certification #: 2926.01 Alaska Certification #: UST-078 Alaska Certification #MN00064 Alabama Certification #40770 Arizona Certification #: AZ-0014 Arkansas Certification #: 88-0680 California Certification #: 01155CA Colorado Certification #Pace Connecticut Certification #: PH-0256 EPA Region 8 Certification #: 8TMS-L FloridalNELAP Certification #: E87605 Guam Certification #:14-008r Georgia Certification #: 959 Georgia EPD #: Pace Idaho Certification #: MN00064 Hawaii Certification #MN00064 Illinois Certification #: 200011 Indiana Certiflcation#C-MN-01 Iowa Certification M 368 Kansas Certification #: E-10167 Kentucky Dept of Envi. Protection - DW #90062 Kentucky Dept of Envi. Protection - W W #:90062 Louisiana DIED Certification #: 3086 Louisiana DHH #: LA140001 Maine Certification #: 2013011 Maryland Certification #: 322 Michigan DEPH Certification #: 9909 CERTIFICATIONS Minnesota Certification #: 027-053-137 Mississippi Certification #: Pace Montana Certification C MT0092 Nevada Certification M MN 00064 Nebraska Certification #: Pace New Jersey Certification #: MN-002 New York Certfication #: 11647 North Carolina Certification #: 530 North Carolina State Public Health #: 27700 North Dakota Certification #: R-036 Ohio EPA#: 4150 Ohio VAP Certification #: C001 Oklahoma Certification M 9507 Oregon Certification #: MN200001 Oregon Certification #: MN300001 Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-00563 Puerto Rico Certification Saipan (CNMI) #:MP0003 South Carolina #:74003001 Texas Certification #: T104704192 Tennessee Certification M 02818 Utah Certification #: MN000642013-4 Virginia DGS Certification #: 251 VuginiaNELAP Certification #: Pace Washington Certification M C486 West Virginia Certification #: 382 West Virginia DHHR #:9952C Wisconsin Certification #: 999407970 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc_ Page 2 of 13 ceMalytical4 1700 Elm Street •Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 w Pawaas.com (612)807-1700 , SAMPLE SUMMARY Project: 2016-PO122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received 10305821001 ST-3 (20 Feet) Solid 05/07115 15:00 05/11/15 16,45 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced except in full wnhout the written consent of Pace Analytical Services. Inc. Page 3 of 13 alo /�ace A alwrwpecefabs.cpn"&= 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 Lab ID Sample ID 10305821001 ST-3 (20 Feet) SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT Method WI MOD DRO ASTM D2974 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytes Analysts Reported JRH 2 JDL 1 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, wrthout the wnften consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 4 of 13 jrQ/t,,,,/•, 1700Elm Street - Suite VVGG/y /(�/�/(�l�l cafe 414 Minneapolis, MN 55414 arrw.0qoalsbsmrm (612)807-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 Method: WI MOD DRO Description: WIDRO GCS Client: The Javelin Group Date: May 18, 2015 General Information: 1 sample was analyzed for WI MOD DRO. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Sample Preparation: The samples were prepared in accordance with WI MOD DRO with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below Surrogates: All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. QC Batch: OEXT/29152 A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) were performed on the following sample(s): 10305372009 Mt: Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. • MS (Lab ID: 1964184) • WDRO C10-C28 • MSD (Lab ID: 1964185) • WDRO C10-C28 Additional Comments: Analyte Comments: QC Batch: OEXT/29152 1M: The sample was re -weighed into a new container because the original container did not have a tare weight. • MS (Lab ID: 1964184) • n-Triacontane (S) REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 5 of 13 f ace na icajf • V V1700 Elm Street - Suite 4200 14 f GNG/-r�r rCUyl 4C�7 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 i PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 Method: WI MOD DRO Description: WIDRO GCS Client: The Javelin Group Date: May 18, 2015 Analyte Comments: QC Batch: OEXT/29152 1 M: The sample was re -weighed into a new container because the original container did not have a tare weight. • MSD (Lab ID: 1964185) • n-Triacontane (S) E: Analyte concentration exceeded the calibration range. The reported result is estimated. • MS (Lab ID: 1964184) • WDRO C10-C28 • MSD (Lab ID: 1964185) • WDRO C10-C28 T6: High boiling point hydrocarbons are present in the sample. • ST-3 (20 Feet) (Lab ID: 10305821001) • WDRO C70-C28 T7: Low boiling point hydrocarbons are present in the sample. • MS (Lab ID: 19(>4184) • WDRO C70-C28 • MSD (Lab ID: 1964185) • WDRO C10-C28 • ST-3 (20 Feet) (Lab ID: 10305821001) • WDRO C10-C28 This data package has been reviewed for quality and completeness and is approved for release. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 6 of 13 I//�Vri''^" cal* e+w'Os�smm 1700 Elm Street- Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 Sample: ST-3 (20 Feet) Lab ID: 10305821001 Collected: 05/07/15 15:00 Received: 05/11/15 16:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a -dry weight- basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Report Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual WIDRO GCS Analytical Method: WI MOD DRO Preparation Method: WI MOD DRO WDRO C10-C28 49.2 mg/kg 10.6 1.2 1 05/13/15 13:04 06/15/15 10:57 T6,T7 Surrogates n-Triaoontane (S) 86 %. 50-150 1 05/13/15 13:04 05/15/15 10:57 638-68-6 Dry Weight Analytical Method: ASTM D2974 Percent Moisture 14.0 % 0.10 0.10 1 05/13/15 10:46 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be repmduced, except in full, Date: 0511 WO15 03:10 PM without the written consent of Pace Ana"cal Services, Inc.. Page 7 of 13 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ,�PaceAnalyticalo naw.papambstnni QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 QC Batch: MPRP/54355 Analysis Method: ASTM D2974 QC Batch Method: ASTM D2974 Analysis Description: Dry Weight/Percent Moisture Associated Lab Samples: 10305821001 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1963872 10305441018 Dup Max Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 9.9 10.4 6 30 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1963873 10305839004 Dup Max Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 14.3 14.2 0 30 Results preeenteE on this page am in the units irsto ed Or Me'Unib' column except whom an alternate unh is pmsenbE w the right of the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 05/18/2015 03:10 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 8 of 13 ��. ttwstpxalekccRn 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 QC Batch: OEXT/29152 Analysis Method: WI MOD ORO QC Batch Method: WI MOD DRO Analysis Description: WIDRO GCS Associated Lab Samples: 10305821001 METHOD BLANK: 1964181 Associated Lab Samples: 10305821001 Parameter WDRO C10-C28 n-Triacontane (S) Matrix: Solid Blank Reporting Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers mg/kg NO 10.0 05/15/1510:09 %. 82 50-150 05/15/1510:09 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE & LCSD: 1964182 1964183 Spike LCS LCSD LCS LCSD % Rec Max Parameter Units Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPO RPD Qualifiers WDRO C10-C28 mg/kg 80 58.5 67.2 73 84 70-120 14 20 n-Triacontane (S) %. 82 94 50-150 MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1964184 1964185 MS MSD 10305372009 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual WDRO C10-C28 mg/kg 1130 89.8 89.8 1390 1440 287 339 70-120 3 20 E,M1, T7 n-Triacontane (S) ^/o. 86 84 50-150 1M Results pusente4 on Nis pe" are in Me units irnacaW by tM'Unfts" column except wl re en attemets unR is pmenMd m the ripe of the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 05/18/2015 03:10 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 9 of 13 %�aceAnalytical8 l w pacelahs.mn o.o 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 1612)607-1700 QUALIFIERS Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 DEFINITIONS DF - Dilution Factor, if reported. represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot. ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit. PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit. RL - Reporting Limit. S - Surrogate 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is a combined concentration. Consistent with EPA guidelines. unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for each analyte is a combined concentration. Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. TNI - The NELAC Institute. WORKORDER QUALIFIERS WO'. 10305821 11) Samples requiring thermal preservation were received outside of recommended temperature limits of 0-6 degrees Celsius. ANALYTE QUALIFIERS 1 M The sample was re -weighed into a new container because the original container did not have a tare weight. E Analyte concentration exceeded the calibration range. The reported result is estimated. M1 Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. T6 High boiling point hydrocarbons are present in the sample. T7 Low boiling point hydrocarbons are present in the sample. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 05/18/2015 03, 10 PM without the wntum consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 10 of 13 �KceAnalytical wwwpaWabs.mn 1700 Elm Street - Suke 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Pace Project No.: 10305821 Lab ID Sample ID 10305821001 10305821001 ST-3 (20 Feet) ST-3 (20 Feet) QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE QC Batch Method @41dU11311:i�7 ASTM D2974 QC Batch Analytical Method OEXT/29152 WI MOD DRO MPRP/54355 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Batch GCSV/15696 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 05/1 BQ015 03:10 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 11 of 13 /, -PaceAnalytical' sAwAaaleM.wm Section A Requires Clam Inionnatlon: CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY / Analytical Request Document The Chalnof-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be completed accurately. Section B Section C RaWNea Prulect Inlborm.: © ,%vRa P ge: of 1 Company: Report To: ,atentipn 1844029 Address: ,Lc Copy Tc: Company Name: ]] REGULATORY AGEN Y rrie. Address' r NPDES F GR ND WATER (- DRINKING WATER - E it o: Purchase Order No.: PorA Ouse ( • ] UST RC OTHER P e Fax: Project Name: Pam Project Site LoDaUoD Manage Raquesb Due QatsfTAT. Project Number:.: Pau pro x Git 7, V (r (� 6TA7E: ReCiDested Anal F11 (YM) Section 0 Matrix Codes w a IbeuirWClbntlMormeEpn MATRI%/CODE g COLLECTED P/eservaNtres S D,Mmg WSW DW � � Z O Water WT waste cwater WW Produt p COe�artE COxtmRA9 W Z Soll3oNd SL SAMPLE ID O1l OL ~ m wipe wP �- w (A-2, 0-9 /:) Air AR Op W a F Sample lDs MUST BE UNIQUE Tissue TS ad F m t U Other OT U TDATETIME T.ATETIIEy O a « nq' G O O O O O Z I: u 7 2 2 2 Z 2 *I I I I I I 1 11 191- Pace Pro ect Nol Lab I.D. I SL 2 b 4 B 6 7 S 8. YO /t 12. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELINQUISHED BY I AFflL1ATTON DATE TIME ACCEPTED BY I AFFILIATION DATE TIME SAMPLE CONDITIONS m SAMPLER NAME AND SIGNATURE O m ORIGINAL yy�' PRINT Name of SAMPLER: SIGNATURE of SAMPLER: DATE Signed , O, A MMIDDIYY): y w 'Important Nola: By agree We form ix "accepting Pam'a NErwaey p.ym.m ame.rd aPaemp a lets, the of 1.6% par momm n,rary mwlre wpale Hamm w am. ' I I F-ALL-0-020rev.07, ISMay-2007 •--; Document Name: Document Revised: 23Feb2015 CEA(!a(1rtIC2� sample condition Upon Receipt Form Page 1 of 1 Document No.: Issuing Authority: T"' F-MN-L-213-rev.13 Pace Minnesota Quality Office Client Name: Project #: Courier: ❑Fed Ex ❑UPS ❑USPS 3 01',e-nt ❑Commercial ❑Pate ❑SpeeDee ❑Other: Tracking Number: Custody Seal an Cooler/Box Present? []Yes No Seals Intact? Des Packing Material: ❑Bubble Wrap ❑Bubble Bags ❑None ❑Other: WO#:10305821 1111111111111111111111 10305821 DOptional: Proj. Due Date: Frei. Name: 0 Temp Blank? ❑Yes ❑No Thermometer ❑ B88A9130516413 ❑B$BA912167504 Type of Ice: et Used: SA0143310096 []Blue[]None[]Samples on Ice, cooling process has begun Cooler Temp Read (°C):-.7 Cooler Temp Corrected ('C): Biological Tissue Frozen? ❑Yes No / Temp should be above freezing to 6"C Correction Factor: 45%5 Date and Initials of Person Examining Contents: USDA Regulated Soil (❑ N/A, water sample) Did samples originate in a quarantine zone within the United States: AL, AR, AZ, CA, FL, GA, ID, LA. id samples originate from a foreign source (internationally, MS, NC, NM, NY, OK, OR, SC, TN, TX or WA (check maps)? ❑Yeso Including Hawaii and Puerto Riw)? Dyes QNo If Yes to either question, fill out a Regulated Soil Checklist (F-MN-Q-338) and include with SOUR/COC paperwork. COMMENTS: Chain of Custody Present? es []No ❑N/A 1. Chain of Custody Filled Out? Ble [IN. []N/A 2. Chain of Custody Relinquished? 2rs [IN. ❑N/A 3. Sampler Name and/or Signature on COC? es []NO ❑N/A 4. Samples Arrived within Hold Time? Yes ❑No ❑N/A S. Short Hold Time Analysis (<72 hr)? ❑Yes o ❑N/A 6. Rush TurnAround Time Requested? []YesM o ❑N/A 7. Sufficient Volume? [IN. ❑N/A 8. Correct Containers Used? �es ,, Kss [IN. ❑N/A 9. -Pace Containers Used? �tes []NO ❑N/A Containers Intact? n< No N/A 10. Filtered Volume Received for Dissolved Tests? ❑Yes ❑No /p 11. Note if sediment is visible in the dissolved container Sample Labels Match COC? ,.✓ Ly res ❑No ❑N/A 12. ` -Includes Date/time/ID/Analysis Matrix: �✓ All containers needing acid/base preservation have been � � 13. ❑HNOs ❑H2SO. []NaOH ❑HCI checked? ❑yes ❑ ON N A All containers needing preservation are found to be in Sample*I compliance with EPA recommendation? (HNOa, H,SO., HCI<2; NaOH >9 Sulfide, NaOH>12 Cyanide) []Yes ❑No B4/A Exceptions: VOA, Coliform, TOC, Oil and Grease, Initial when Lot # of added DRO/8015(water) DOC Dyes ,_.,� [Mo ❑N/A completed: preservative: Headspace In VOA Vials ( >6mm)? []Yes []NO /A 14. Trip Blank Present? ❑Yes ❑No /A 15. Trip Blank Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes ONO [ykV/A Pace Trip Blank Lot # (if purchased): CLIENT NOTIFICATION/RESOLUTION Person Contacted: _ Comments/Resolution: 5;.Icz- 1^0 'i Project Manager Review: Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting h Ca hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers). Date/Time: Field Data Required? Des []No CW Date: "I )eZ r a� — be sent to the Nort rolina DEHNR Certifiation Office ( Le out of Page 13 of 13 / aceAnalytical o I' wNw.peoNebs.com ... 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 August 11, 2015 Kevin Pierson The Javelin Group 10125 Crosstown Circle Suite 107 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Dear Kevin Pierson: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on August 03, 2015. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Kabor Xiong kabor.xiong@pacelabs.com Project Manager Enclosures REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 1 of 32 cal •1rt,'yspNep¢.carn .......... . 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Minnesota Certification IDs 1700 Elm Street SE Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55414 A21-A Certification #: 2926.01 Alaska Certification #: UST-078 Alaska Certification #MN00064 Alabama Certification #40770 Arizona Certification #: AZ-0014 Arkansas Certification #: 88-0680 California Certification #: 01155CA Colorado Certification #Pace Connecticut Certification #: PH-0256 EPA Region 8 Certification #: 8TMS-1- Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87605 Guam Certification #:14-008r Georgia Certification #: 959 Georgia EPD #: Pace Idaho Certification #: MN00064 Hawaii Certification #MN00064 Illinois Certification #: 200011 Indiana Certification#C-MN-01 Iowa Certification #: 368 Kansas Certification #: E-10167 Kentucky Dept of Envi. Protection - DW #90062 Kentucky Dept of Envi. Protection - WW #:90062 Louisiana DEO Certification #: 3086 Louisiana DHH #: LA140001 Maine Certification #: 2013011 Maryland Certification #: 322 Michigan DEPH Certification #: 9909 CERTIFICATIONS Minnesota Certification #: 027-053-137 Mississippi Certification #: Pace Montana Certification M MT0092 Nevada Certification #: MN 00064 Nebraska Certification #: Pace New Jersey Certification #: MN-002 New York Certification #: 11647 North Carolina Certification #: 530 North Carolina State Public Health M 27700 North Dakota Certification #: R-036 Ohio EPA#: 4150 Ohio VAP Certification #: CL101 Oklahoma Certification #: 9507 Oregon Certification #: MN200001 Oregon Certification #: MN300001 Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-00563 Puerto Rico Certification Saipan (CNMI) #:MP0003 South Carolina #:74003001 Texas Certification #: T104704192 Tennessee Certification #: 02818 Utah Certification #: MN0006420134 Virginia DGS Certification #: 251 Virginia/VELAP Certification #: Pace Washington Certfication #: G486 West Virginia Certification #: 382 West Virginia DHHR#:9952C Wisconsin Certification #: 999407970 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 2 of 32 / aceAnalytical e wwrpscNeb&= 1700 Elm Street- Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Lab ID Sample ID 10316691001 GP-1 Is 10316691002 GP-121' 10316691003 GP-21.5' 10316691004 GP-2 23' 10316691005 Trip Blanks SAMPLE SUMMARY Matrix Date Collected Date Received Solid 08103/1512:30 08/03/1516:01 Solid 08103/1512:50 08/03/1516:01 Solid 08/03/1513:30 0810311516:01 Solid 08/03/1514:15 08/03/1516:01 Solid 08/03/15 00:00 08/03/15 16:01 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 3 of 32 �aceAnalytical rww.Pecnisbs.mn 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)6D7-1700 SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Lab ID Sample ID Method Analysts Analytes Reported 10316691001 GP-1 1.5' WI MOD DRO JRH 2 WI MOD GRO CMB 2 EPA6010C DM 7 EPA 7471E JDD 1 ASTM D2974 JDL 1 EPA 8270D by SIM AS1 19 EPA 8260B SH2 7 10316691002 GP-1 21' WI MOD DRO JRH 2 WI MOD GRO CMB 2 EPA 8260E SH2 7 10316691003 GP-21.5' WI MOD DRO JRH 2 WI MOD GRO CMB 2 EPA6010C DM 7 EPA7471B JDD 1 ASTM D2974 JDL 1 EPA 8270D by SIM AS1 19 EPA 82608 SH2 7 10316691004 GP-2 23' WI MOD DRO JRH 2 WI MOD GRO CMB 2 ASTM D2974 JDL 1 EPA 8260B SH2 7 10316691005 Trip Blanks WI MOD GRO CMB 2 EPA8260B SH2 7 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Ana"cal Services, Inc.. Page 4 of 32 - aceAnalytical ww.vpacela0.5.rxNn 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis. MN 55414 (612)607-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No 10316691 Method: WI MOD DRO Description: WIDRO GCS Client: The Javelin Group Date: August 11. 2015 General Information: 4 samples were analyzed for WI MOD DRO. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain -of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Sample Preparation: The samples were prepared in accordance with WI MOD DRO with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Surrogates: All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank. where applicable, with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. Additional Comments: Analyte Comments: QC Batch: OEXT/30256 T6: High boiling point hydrocarbons are present in the sample. • GP-1 1.5' (Lab ID: 10316691001) • WDRO C10-C28 • GP-1 21' (Lab ID: 10316691002) • WDRO C 10-C28 • GP-2 1.5' (Lab ID: 10316691003) • WDRO C10-C28 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproducedr except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 5 of 32 ceAnalytical e 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Method: WI MOD GRO Description: WIGRO GCV Client: The Javelin Group Date: August 11, 2015 General Information: 5 samples were analyzed for WI MOD GRO. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain -of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt forth (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Sample Preparation: The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 5030 Medium Soil with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Internal Standards: All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Surrogates: All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. QC Batch: GCV/14185 S2: Surrogate recovery outside laboratory control limits due to malrb( interferences (confirmed by similar results from sample re- analysis). • GP-2 23' (Lab ID: 10316691004) • a,a,a-Trifiuorotoluene (S) Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. Duplicate Sample: All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. Additional Comments: REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 6 of 32 l aceAnalytical www.pacelabs V1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis. MN 55414 (612)607-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-130122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.. 10316691 Method: EPA 6010C Description: 6010C MET ICP Client: The Javelin Group Date: August 11. 2015 General Information: 2 samples were analyzed for EPA 6010C. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain -of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Sample Preparation: The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 3050 with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below. QC Batch: MPRP/56705 P8. Analyte was detected in the method blank. All associated samples had concentrations of at least ten times greater than the blank or were below the reporting limit. • BLANK (Lab ID'. 2041229) Barium Chromium Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. Additional Comments: Analyte Comments. QC Batch. MPRP/56705 P8: Analyte was detected in the method blank. All associated samples had concentrations of at least ten times greater than the blank or were below the reporting limit. • BLANK (Lab ID: 2041229) Barium Chromium REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced. except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 7 of 32 • ceAnalytical •rI•.0•c•19esbam r wv.a apuwuvnmvauic. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 2200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Method: EPA 7471E Description: 7471 B Mercury Client: The Javelin Group Date: August 11, 2015 General Information: 2 samples were analyzed for EPA 7471 B. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain -of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Sample Preparation: The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 7471 B with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. Additional Comments: REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in Full, without the written consent of Pace Analocal Services, Inc.. Page 8 of 32 /7?alceAnalytical +^mvpecelabs. xvr, 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Method: EPA 8270D by SIM Description: 8270D MSSV PAH by SIM Client: The Javelin Group Date: August 11, 2015 General Information: 2 samples were analyzed for EPA 8270D by SIM. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain -of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Sample Preparation: The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 3550 with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Internal Standards: All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Surrogates: All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. QC Batch: OEXT/30270 S0: Surrogate recovery outside laboratory control limits. • MS (Lab ID: 2041862) • 2-Fluorobipheny)(S) • p-Terphenyl-d14 (S) Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank where applicable. with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. QC Batch: OEXT/30270 A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) were performed on the following sample(s): 10316443001 M1: Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. • MS (Lab ID: 2041862) • Acenaphthene • Acenaphthylene • Anthracene REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the wntten consent of Pace Analytical Services. Inc.. Page 9 of 32 a .,. AnnpicaIe •�y1700Elm Street - Suite 200 I// V Minneapolis, M414 arwplcslsb&= N (812)607-1700-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Method: EPA 8270D by SIM Description: 8270D MSSV PAH by SIM Client: The Javelin Group Date: August 11, 2015 QC Batch: 0EXT/30270 A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) were performed on the following sample(s): 10316443001 Ml: Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. • Benzo(a)anthracene • Benzo(a)pyrene • Benzo(b)fluoranthene • Benzo(g,h,i)perylene • Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene • Dibenz(a,h)anthracene • Fluoranthene • Fluorene •lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene • Phenanthrene Pyrene MSD (Lab ID: 2041863) • Acenaphthene • Acenaphthylene • Anthracene • Benzo(a)anthracene • Benzo(a)pyrene • Benzo(b)fluoranthene • Benzo(g,hJ)perylene • Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene • Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Fluorene •lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene • Naphthalene • Phenanthrene • Pyrene R7: RPD value was outside control limits. • MSD (Lab ID: 2041863) • Naphthalene Additional Comments: Analyte Comments: QC Batch: 0EXT/30270 D4: Sample was diluted due to the presence of high levels of target analytes. • MS (Lab ID: 2041862) • 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) • MSD (Lab ID: 2041863) • 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Anaytical Services, Inc.. Page 10 of 32 %_�aceAnalytical w ,Paceii mrn 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-P0I22-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No. 10316691 Method: EPA 8260E Description: 8260B MSV UST Client: The Javelin Group Date: August 11, 2015 General Information: 5 samples were analyzed for EPA 8260B. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain -of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Sample Preparation: The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 5035/5030B with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below Internal Standards: All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Surrogates: All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable. with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. QC Batch: MSV/32640 A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) were performed on the following sample(s) : 10316681002 M1. Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. • MS (Lab ID: 2043304) • Toluene Duplicate Sample: All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. Additional Comments: REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 11 of 32 CB A,,,,L k �' 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 wwvpaoaws.wra Minneapolis, MN 5414 (612)607-1700-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Method: EPA 8260E Description: 8260E MSV UST Client: The Javelin Group Date: August 11, 2015 Analyte Comments: QC Batch: MSV/32640 1 M: The sample could not achieve the 1:1 ratio of soil to methanol due to excessive sample weight. • DUP (Lab ID: 2043303) • 1,2-Dichloroethane-04 (S) This data package has been reviewed for quality and completeness and is approved for release. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 12 of 32 ��ceAnalytical e rwwpaoalesstorn 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Sample: GP-1 1.5- Lab ID: 10316691001 Collected: 08/03/15 12:30 Received: 08/03/15 16:01 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a 'dry weight- basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Report Parameters Results Units Limit MDL OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual WIDRO GCS WDRO C1O-C28 Surrogates n-Triacontane (S) WIGRO GCV Gasoline Range Organics Surrogates a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene (S) 6010C MET ICP Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Selenium Silver 7471B Mercury Mercury Dry Weight Percent Moisture 8270D MSSV PAH by SIM Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz(a, h)anth racene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Total BaP Eq. MN 2006sh. ND=O Surrogates 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) p-Terphenyl-014 (S) Date: 08/11/2015 08:37 AM Analytical Method: WI MOD DRO Preparation Method: WI MOD DRO 26.0 mg/kg 8.7 1.0 1 08/04/1513:42 08/06/1517:11 85 %. 50-150 1 08/04/1513:42 08106/1517:11 638-08-6 Analytical Method: WI MOD GRO Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Medium Soil NO mg/kg 10.7 2.2 1 08/05/15 09:12 08/06/15 14:39 88 %. 80-150 1 08/05/15 09:12 08/06115 14:39 98-08-8 Analytical Method: EPA 6010C Preparation Method: EPA 3050 5.7 mg/k9 0.81 0.20 1 08/05/15 07:30 08/06/15 15:12 7440-38-2 100 ni OA1 0.041 1 08/05/15 07:30 08/06/15 15:12 7440-39-3 NO mg/k9 0.12 0.031 1 08/05/15 07:30 OB/O6/15 15:12 7440-43-9 12.5 mg/kg 0.41 0.061 1 08/05/15 07:30 08/06/15 15:12 7440-47-3 9.4 mg/kg 0.41 0.098 1 08/05/15 07:30 08106/15 15:12 7439-92-1 NO mg/kg 0.81 0.33 1 08/05/15 07:30 08106/15 15:12 7782-49-2 NO mg/kg 0.41 0.094 1 08/05/15 07:30 08/06/1515:12 7440-22-4 Analytical Method: EPA 7471 B Preparation Method: EPA 7471E 0.031 mg/kg 0.020 0.0068 1 08/06/15 08:02 Oa/06/15 17:55 7439-97-6 Analytical Method: ASTM D2974 9.7 % 0.10 0.10 1 08/04/1513:58 Analytical Method: EPA 8270D by SIM Preparation Method: EPA 3550 T6 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.40 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 83-32-9 15.8 ug/kg 11.1 0.38 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07115 23:37 208-96-8 11.7 ug/kg 11.1 0.34 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 120-12-7 64.4 ug/kg 11.1 0.20 1 08/05/15 1751 08/07/15 23:37 56-55-3 72.1 ug/kg 11.1 0.22 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 50-32-8 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.39 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 205-99-2 44.7 ug/kg 11.1 0.39 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 191-24-2 129 ug/kg 11.1 0.44 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 207-08-9 63.1 ug/kg 11.1 0.27 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 218-01-9 11.9 ug/kg 11.1 0.48 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 53-70-3 108 ug/kg _ 11.1 0.24 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 206-44-0 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.34 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 86-73-7 39.1 ug/kg 11.1 0.43 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 193-39-5 ND u9/kg 11.1 0.41 1 08/05/15 17:51 08107/1523:37 91-20-3 29.4 ug/kg 11.1 0.27 1 08/05/1517:51 08/07/15 23:37 85-01-8 92.8 u9A9 11.1 0.27 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07115 23:37 129-00-0 103 ug/kg 11.1 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 80 °h. 55-125 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 321-60-8 93 %. 30-150 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:37 1718-51-0 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 13 of 32 ��aceAnalyfibal* wwepe�ebs.mm 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Sample: GP-1 1.5' Lab ID: 10316691001 Collected: 08/03/15 12:30 Received: 08/03/1516:01 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a -dry weight- basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Report Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260B MSV UST Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylene (Total) Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 IS) Toluene-d8 (S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene IS) Date: 08/112015 08:37 AM Analytical Method: EPA 8260E Preparation Method: EPA 5035/6030B ND ug/kg 23.1 8.1 1 08106/1512:16 08/0711510:54 71-43-2 ND ug/kg 57.9 8.7 1 08/06/1512:16 08/07/1510:54 100-41-4 ND ug/kg 57.9 11.1 1 08/06/1512:16 08/07/1510:54 108-88-3 ND ug/kg 174 34.6 1 08/06/1512:16 OB/07/1510:54 1330-20-7 92 h. 55-150 1 08/0611512:16 08/07/1510:54 17060-07-0 101 °h. 61-125 1 08/06/1512:16 08107/1510:54 2037-26-5 97 W 54-131 1 08/0611512:16 08107/1510:54 460-00-4 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 14 of 32 /7l ceAnalylical' aaw.Pxale6,s.wrm race wnaryucai aervices, mc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607.1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Sample: GP-1 21' Lab ID: 10316691002 Collected: 08/03/15 12:50 Received: 08/03/15 16:01 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Report Parameters Results Units Limlt MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Oual WIDRO GCS WDRO C10-C28 Surrogates n-Triacontane (S) WIGRO GCV Gasoline Range Organics Surrogates a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene (S) Percent Moisture 8260E MSV UST Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylene (Total) Surrogates 1,2-Dichlorcethane-d4 (S) Toluene-d8(S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) Date: 08/11/2015 08:37 AM Analytical Method: WI MOD DRO Preparation Method: WI MOD DRO 19.4 mg/kg 9.4 1.1 1 08104/1513:42 08106/1516:50 T6 76 %. 50-150 1 08/04/15 13:42 08/06/15 16:50 638-68-6 Analytical Method: WI MOD GRO Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Medium Soil NO mg/kg 13.9 2.8 1 08/05/15 09:12 08/06/15 15:02 87 %. 80-150 1 08/05/15 09:12 08/06/15 15:02 98-08-8 Analytical Method: ASTM D2974 23.4 % 0.10 0.10 1 08/0411513:58 Analytical Method: EPA 8260E Preparation Method: EPA 5035/5030B ND ug/kg 26.8 9.4 1 08106/1512:16 08107/1511:14 7143-2 ND ug/kg 67.0 10.0 1 08/06/1512:16 08/07/1511:14 100-41-4 ND ug/kg 67.0 12.9 1 08/06/1512:16 08/07/1511:14 108-88-3 ND ug/kg 201 40.1 1 08/06/15 12:16 08/07/15 11:14 1330-20-7 92 W 55-150 1 08/06/1512:16 08/07/1511:14 17060-07-0 101 °h. 61-125 1 08/0611512:16 08/07/1511:14 2037-26-5 96 54-131 1 08/06/1512:16 08/07/1511:14 460-00-4 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Ana"cal Services, Inc.. Page 15 of 32 ��Ce Analytiical' rr&r'Oacabbscam 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Sample: GP-2 1.5' Lab ID: 10316691003 Collected: 08/03/15 13:30 Received: 08/03/15 16:01 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Report Parameters Results Units Limit MDL OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual WIDRO GCS WDRO C10-C28 Surrogates n-Triacontane (S) WIGRO GCV Gasoline Range Organics Surrogates a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene (S) 6010C MET ICP Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Selenium Silver 7471B Mercury Mercury Dry Weight Percent Moisture 8270D MSSV PAH by SIM Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz(a, h)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Total BaP Eq. MN 20D6sh. ND=O Surrogates 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) p-Terphenyl-d14 (S) Date: 08/11 /2015 08:37 AM Analytical Method: WI MOD DRO Preparation Method: WI MOD DRO 29.9 mg/kg 8.6 0.99 1 0810411513:42 08/0611516:37 95 %. 50-150 1 0810411513:42 08/06/1516:37 638-68-6 Analytical Method: WI MOD GRO Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Medium Soil NO mg/kg 11.8 2.4 1 08/05/1509:12 08/06/1515:24 83 %. 80-150 1 08/05/15 09:12 08/06/15 15:24 98-08-8 Analytical Method: EPA 6010C Preparation Method: EPA 3050 4.9 mg/kg 0.88 0.21 1 08/05/15 07:30 08/06/15 15:43 7440-38-2 70.9 mg/kg 0.44 0.044 1 08/05/15 07:30 08/06/15 15:43 7440-39-3 NO mg/kg 0.13 0.033 1 08/05/15 07:30 08/06/15 15:43 7440-43-9 11.2 mg/kg 0.44 0.066 1 08/05/15 07:30 08/06/15 15:43 7440-47-3 8.0 mg/kg 0.44 0.11 1 08/06/15 07:30 08/06/15 15:43 7439-92-1 NO mg/kg 0.88 0.36 1 08/05/15 07:30 08/06/15 15:43 7782-49-2 NO mg/kg 0.44 0.10 1 08/05/15 07:30 08/06/15 15:43 7440-22-4 Analytical Method: EPA 7471 B Preparation Method: EPA 7471 B 0.026 mg/kg 0.021 0.0073 1 08/06/15 08:02 08/06/15 17:57 7439-97-6 Analytical Method: ASTM D2974 10.2 % 0.10 0.10 1 08/04/1613:59 Analytical Method: EPA 8270D by SIM Preparation Method: EPA 3550 T6 NO ug/kg 11A 0.40 1 0810511517:51 08107/1523:16 83-32-9 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.38 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 208-96-8 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.34 1 08/05/16 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 120-12-7 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.20 1 08105/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 56-55-3 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.22 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 50-32-8 NO ug/kg 11A 0.39 1 08/0511517:51 08/07/15 23:16 205-99-2 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.39 1 08/0511517:51 08/07/15 23:16 191-24-2 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.45 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 207-08-9 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.27 1 08/06/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 218-01-9 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.48 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 53-70-3 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.24 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 206-44-0 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.34 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 86-73-7 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.43 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 193-39-5 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.41 1 08105/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 91-20-3 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.28 1 08/05/15 17:51 08/07/15 23:16 85-01-8 NO ug/kg 11.1 0.27 1 08/05/15 17:51 O11107/15 23:16 129-00-0 ND ug/kg 11.1 1 08/05/15 17:51 011/07/1523,16 84 °h. 55-125 1 08/05/15 17:51 08107/15 23:16 321-60-8 96 %. 30-150 1 08/0511517:51 08107/1523:16 1718-51-0 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 16 of 32 1�aceAnalytical e w Pgcslsbarorm I ANALYTICAL RESULTS ray1700 Elm Street- Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Sample: GP-2 1.5' Lab ID: 10316691003 Collected: 08/03/15 13:30 Received: 08/03/15 16:01 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a -dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Report Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Dual 8260E MSV UST Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylene (Total) Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 IS) Toluene-d8 IS) 4-Bromofluorobenzene IS) Date: OB/112015 08:37 AM Analytical Method: EPA 8260E Preparation Method: EPA 5035/5030B ND ug/kg 22.7 7.9 1 08/06/15 12:16 08/07/15 11:33 71-43-2 ND ug/kg 56.7 8.5 1 08/06/15 12:16 08107/1511:33 100-41-4 ND ug/kg 56.7 10.9 1 08/06/15 12:16 08/07/1511:33 108-88-3 ND ug/kg 170 33.9 1 08/06/1512:16 08107/1511:33 1330-20-7 89 %. 55-150 1 08/06/15 12:16 08/07/15 11:33 17060-07-0 101 %. 61-125 1 08/06/15 12:16 08/07/15 11:33 2037-26-5 98 %. 54-131 1 08/O6/1512:16 08/0711511:33 460-00-4 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services. Inc.. Page 17 of 32 ��. wlrwMselsb&oom rasa nnaryuca, amvrcea, nm. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 2L0 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Sample: GP-2 23' Lab ID: 10316691004 Collected: 08/03/15 14:15 Received: 08/03/15 16:01 Matra: Solid Results reported on a -dry weight- basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Report Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual WIDRO GCS WDRO C10-C28 Surrogates n-Triacontane (S) WIGRO GCV Gasoline Range Organics Surrogates a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene IS) Dry Weight Percent Moisture 8260B MSV UST Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylene (Total) Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) Toluene-d8 (S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) Date: 08/112015 08:37 AM Analytical Method: WI MOD DRO Preparation Method: WI MOD DRO 11.6 mg/kg 10 1.2 1 08/04/15 13:42 08/06/15 18:19 80 %. 50-150 1 08/04/1513:42 08/06/1518:19 638-68-6 Analytical Method: WI MOD GRO Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Medium Soil 30.2 mg/kg 13.3 2.7 1 08/05/15 09:12 08/09/15 13:12 77 %. 80-150 1 08/05/15 09:12 08/09/15 13:12 98-08-8 S2 Analytical Method: ASTM D2974 17.3 % 0.10 0.10 1 08/04/1513:59 Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5035/5030B NO ug/kg 24.6 8.6 1 08/06/1512:16 08/07/1511:54 7143-2 NO ug/kg 61.6 9.2 1 08/06/1512:16 08/07/1511:54 100-414 NO ug/kg 61.6 11.8 1 08/0611512:16 08107/1511:54 108-88-3 NO ug/kg 185 36.8 1 08106/1512:16 08/07/1511:54 1330-20-7 92 %. 55-150 1 08/06/1512:16 08107/1511:54 17060-07-0 101 %. 61-125 1 081D6/15 12:16 08/07/15 11:54 2037-26-5 95 %. 54-131 1 08/D6/1512:16 08/0711611:54 460-004 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 18 of 32 ��ceAnaViical. rnrw.Paoslrbscam i 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 Sample: Trip Blanks Lab ID: 10316691005 Collected: 08/03/15 00:00 Received: 08/03/15 16:01 Matrix: Results reported on a "wet -weight" basis Parameters WIGRO GCV Gasoline Range Organics Surrogates a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene IS) 8260E MSV UST Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylene (Total) Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) Toluene-d8 IS) 4-Bromofluorobenzene IS) Date: 08/112015 08:37 AM Report Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual Analytical Method: WI MOD GRO Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Medium Soil ND mg/kg 625 126 1 08/05/15 09:12 08/06/15 13:32 85 %. 80-150 1 08/05/15 09:12 08/06/15 13:32 98-08-8 Ana"cal Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5035/5030B NO ug/kg 20.0 7.0 1 08/06/1512:16 08/07/1512:15 71-43-2 NO ug/kg 60.0 7.5 1 08/06/1512:16 08/07/1512:15 100-41-4 NO ug/kg 50.0 9.6 1 08/06/15 12:16 08/07/15 12:15 108-88-3 NO ug/kg 150 29.9 1 08/06/1512:16 0810711512:15 1330-20-7 13600 %. 55-160 1 08/0611512:16 08/07/1512:15 17060-07-0 14800 °h. 61-125 1 08106/1512:16 08/07/1512:15 2037-26-5 15400 %. 54-131 1 08106/1512:16 08/0711512:15 460-004 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not he reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services. Inc.. Page 19 of 32 �PaceAnalytical' •'siepacelWs.= race nna yuca, aeremes, mc. 1700 Elm Street - Sure 900 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 QC Batch: GCV/14185 Analysis Method: WI MOD GRO QC Batch Method: EPA 5030 Medium Soil Analysis Description: WIGRO Solid GCV Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691002, 10316691003, 10316691004, 10316691005 METHOD BLANK: 2041704 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691002, 10316691003, 10316691004, 10316691005 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Gasoline Range Organics mg/kg ND 10.0 08/06/15 13:08 a,a,a-Tdfluorotoluene (S) %. 85 80-150 08/06/15 13:08 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE&LCSD: 2041705 2041706 Spike LCS LCSD LCS LCSD %Rec Max Parameter Units Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qualifiers Gasoline Range Organics nrl 50 47.0 46.0 94 92 80-120 2 20 a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene (S) %. 90 91 80-150 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 2041707 10316692001 Spike MS MS % Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers Gasoline Range Organics mg/kg NO 57.1 63.0 110 80-120 a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene (S) %. 91 80-150 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2041708 10316692005 Dup Max Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers Gasoline Range Organics mg/kg NO 2.5.1 20 a,a,a-Trifluorotoluene (S) %. 83 83 1 Reauhs presented on Mis page a e in Me units in listed by Me 'Unit- column except where an alternate unit is evaented t Me right o/ the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/11 /2015 08:37 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 20 of 32 ��aceAnalyficalb wtrxpscda0.aam f 1700 Elm Street - Suke 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (012)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 QC Batch: MERP/14420 Analysis Method: EPA 7471 B QC Batch Method: EPA 7471 B Analysis Description: 7471E Mercury Solids Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691003 METHOD BLANK: 2042080 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691003 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Mercury mg/kg NO 0.018 08/06/1517:23 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2042081 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Mercury mg/kg .48 0.50 104 80-120 MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2042082 - 2042083 MS MSD 10316844001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max Parameter Units Result Conic. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Dust Mercury mg/kg ND .45 .45 0.48 0.48 107 106 75-125 1 20 Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced. except in full. Date: 08/11 /2015 08:37 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 21 of 32 ��PaceAnalytical" wwu.Peaelebaopm race Nnatyucal aervlces, mc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 QC Batch: MPRP/56705 QC Batch Method: EPA 3050 Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691003 Analysis Method: Analysis Description: EPA6010C 6010C Solids METHOD BLANK: 2041229 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691003 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Arsenic nrl NO 0.97 08/06/1515:06 Barium mg/kg 0.69 0.49 08/06/1515:06 P8 Cadmium mg/kg NO 0.15 08/06/1515:06 Chromium mg/kg 0.72 0.49 08106/1515:06 P8 Lead mg/kg ND 0.49 0810611515:06 Selenium mg/kg NO 0.97 08/06/1515:06 Silver mg/kg NO 0.49 08/06/1515:06 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2041230 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Conic. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers Arsenic mg/kg 48.1 46.1 96 80-120 Barium mg/kg 48.1 49.6 103 80-120 Cadmium nrl 48.1 46.6 97 80-120 Chromium mg/kg 48.1 48.8 102 80-120 Lead mg/kg 48.1 47.2 98 80-120 Selenium mg/kg 48.1 45.7 95 80-120 Silver mg/kg 24 23.0 96 80-120 MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2041231 2041232 MS MSD 10316691001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual Arsenic mg/kg 5.7 41 41.3 38.2 40.2 79 84 75-125 5 20 Barium mg/kg 100 41 41.3 140 147 98 115 75-125 5 20 Cadmium mg/kg ND 41 41.3 34.0 35.5 83 86 75-125 4 20 Chromium mg/kg 12.5 41 41.3 47.6 49.6 86 90 75-125 4 20 Lead mg/kg 9.4 41 41.3 41.4 42.4 78 80 75-125 2 20 Selenium mg/kg ND 41 41.3 32.8 34.6 80 83 75-125 5 20 Silver mg/kg NO 20.5 20.7 17.0 17.8 83 86 75-125 5 20 Rasults presented on this page are in tha unit itMicated by the "Units" column except where an ahemale unit is prase Mst! t the right of the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/11/2015 08:37 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 22 of 32 ��aceAnalyticalo •rw.paselaDamrn race wnaryucai aervices, Inc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 QC Batch: MPRP/56697 Analysis Method: ASTM D2974 QC Batch Method: ASTM D2974 Analysis Description: Dry Weight/Percent Moisture Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691002, 10316691003, 10316691004 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2040807 10316644019 Cup Max Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 5.9 5.6 5 30 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2040993 10316273033 Cup Max Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 23.2 24.4 5 30 Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by Me "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to Me right of Me result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/11/2015 08:37 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services. Inc.. Page 23 of 32 %ekwical race nnaryucar aarv¢ea, Inc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 QC Batch: MSV/32640 Analysis Method: EPA 8260E QC Batch Method: EPA 5035/5030B Analysis Description: 8260E MSV UST Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691002, 10316691003, 10316691004, 10316691005 METHOD BLANK: 2042222 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691002, 10316691003, 10316691004, 10316691005 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Benzene ug/kg NO 20.0 08/06/1513:18 Ethylbenzene ug/kg NO 50.0 08/06/1513:18 Toluene ug/kg NO 50.0 08/06/1513:18 Xylene (Total) ug/kg NO 150 08/06/15 13:18 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) %. 91 55-150 08/06/15 13:18 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) °/,. 98 54-131 08/06/15 13:18 Toluene-d8 (S) %. 102 61-125 08/06/15 13:18 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2042223 Spike LCS LCS % Rao Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rao Limits Qualifiers Benzene ug/kg 1000 1090 109 69-125 Ethylbenzene ug/kg 1000 1050 105 72-125 Toluene ug/kg 1000 1100 110 72-125 Xylene (Total) ug/kg 3000 3280 109 74-125 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) %. 89 55-150 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) °h. 103 54-131 Toluene-d8 (S) %. 100 61-125 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 2043304 10316681002 Spike MS MS % Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Result % Rao Limits Qualifiers Benzene ug/kg - NO 878 1090 124 63-126 Ethylbenzene ug/kg NO 878 1060 121 69-126 Toluene ug/kg NO 878 1130 129 66-128 Mt Xylene (Total) ug/kg NO 2630 3250 123 70-130 1,2-Dichloroethaned4 (S) %. 90 55-150 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) %. 96 54-131 Toluened8 (S) %. 102 61-125 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2043303 10316681001 Dup Max Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers Benzene ug/kg NO NO 30 Ethylbenzene ug/kg NO NO 30 Toluene ug/kg NO NO 30 Xylene (Total) ug/kg NO ND 30 Result presented en this page ere in the units indicated by the -units- column except whore an alternate unit is presented to the right a Me mull REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in hull, Date: 08/11 /2015 08:37 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 24 of 32 ��aceftlyficalo xrw.pacelaAaunm race nuaiyuca� am r,cea, nw. 1700 Elm Street- Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2043303 10316681001 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD 1,2-Dichlorcethene-d4 (S) %. 92 91 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) %. 99 97 Toluene-d8 (S) °k. 102 101 Max RPD Qualifiers 2 1M 2 1 Results presentee on this page are in the units indicated by the 'Units' column except when an altemate unit is presentee to Ne right of the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/11/2015 08:37 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 25 of 32 1� ceAnalytifcal' wwwpltmkAacpn ... ..... 1700 Eim Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 QC Batch: OEXT/30270 QC Batch Method: EPA 3550 Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691003 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Analysis Method: EPA 8270D by SIM Analysis Description: 8270D Solid PAH by SIM MSSV METHOD BLANK: 2041843 Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691003 Parameter Units Matra: Blank Result Solid Reporting Limit Analyzed Acenaphthene ug/kg ND 10.0 08/06/15 12:37 Acenaphthylene ug/kg ND 10.0 08/06/15 12:37 Anthracene ug/kg ND 10.0 08/06/15 12:37 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/kg ND 10.0 08/06/15 12:37 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/kg ND 10.0 08/0611512:37 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/kg ND 10.0 08/0611512:37 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg NO 10.0 W06/1512:37 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/kg NO 10.0 08/06/15 12:37 Chrysene ug/kg NO 10.0 08/0611512:37 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/kg NO 10.0 08/1)6/15 12:37 Fluoranthene ug/kg NO 10.0 08/06/15 12:37 Fluorene ug/kg NO 10.0 08/06/15 12:37 Indeno(1,2,3-od)pyrene ug/kg NO 10.0 08/06/15 12:37 Naphthalene ug/kg NO 10.0 08/06/15 12:37 Phenanthrene ug/kg NO 10.0 08/0611512:37 Pyrene ug/kg NO 10.0 08/0611512:37 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) W 68 55-125 08/06/15 12:37 p-Terphenyl-d14 (S) W 86 30-150 08/06/15 12:37 Qualifiers LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: Parameter 2041844 Units Spike Conc. LCS Result LCS %Rec % Rec Limits Acenaphthene ug/kg 33.3 30.1 90 53-125 Acenaphthylene ug/kg 33.3 29.4 88 53-125 Anthracene ug/kg 33.3 36.1 108 61-125 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/kg 33.3 29.5 88 62-125 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/kg 33.3 31.8 95 64-125 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/kg 33.3 31.2 93 66-125 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg 33.3 30.8 92 59-125 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/kg 33.3 34.4 103 61-125 Chrysene ug/kg 33.3 30.7 92 63-125 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/kg 33.3 31.0 93 59-125 Fluoranthene ug/kg 33.3 31.7 95 64-125 Fluorene ug/kg 33.3 29.1 87 57-125 Indeno(1,2,3-od)pyrene ug/kg 33.3 31.0 93 58-125 Naphthalene ug/kg 33.3 28.5 85 52-125 Phenanthrene ug/kg 33.3 29.5 89 60-125 Pyrene ug/kg 33.3 33.7 101 63-125 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) %. 77 55-125 p-Terphenyl-d14 (S) %. 85 30-160 Qualifiers Results presented on this page an In the units indicated by the "Units" column except when an alternate unit Is presented to Me right of the noun. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/11/2015 08:37 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 26 of 32 �ceAnalytic/® 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 a Minneapolis, MN 55414 tvatrpatte 1phs.cgm (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 MATRIX SPIKE 8 MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2041862 2041863 MS MSD 10316443001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual Acenaphthene ug/kg 385 34.4 34.4 397 452 33 194 39-125 13 30 M1 Acenaphthylene ug/kg ND 34.4 34A 144J 186J 419 539 30-150 30 M1 Anthracene ug/kg 950 34.4 34.4 832 780 -342 -495 30-150 7 30 MI Benzo(a)anthracene ug/kg ND 34.4 34.4 ND 244J -422 287 30-150 30 M1 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/kg ND 34.4 34.4 ND ND 0 0 30-150 30 M1 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/kg ND 34.4 34.4 ND ND 0 0 30-150 30 M1 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg ND 34.4 34.4 ND ND 0 0 30-150 30 M1 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/kg ND 34.4 34.4 ND ND 0 0 30-150 30 M1 Chrysene ug/kg 270 34.4 34.4 231J 330 -113 173 30-150 30 MI Dibenz(a,h)anlhracene ug/kg ND 34.4 34.4 ND ND 0 0 30-150 30 M1 Fluoranthene ug/kg ND 34.4 34.4 195J 212J 16 67 30-150 30 Mt Fluorene ug/kg 828 34.4 34.4 821 900 -18 211 30-146 9 30 M1 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/kg ND 34.4 34.4 ND ND 0 0 30-150 30 M1 Naphthalene ug/kg 359 34.4 34.4 371 520 36 467 30-131 33 30 M1,R1 Pherianthrene ug/kg 2570 34.4 34.4 2430 2680 -412 327 30-150 10 30 M1 Pyrene ug/kg 484 34.4 34.4 406 1801 -228 -885 30-150 30 M1 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) %. 0 116 55-125 D4, P3, SO p-Terphenyl-d14 (S) %. 0 116 30-150 SO Results presented m ads pai are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except wham an alternate unit is presented m am right of the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/11/2015 08:37 AM without the written consent of Pace Anarytical Services, Inc.. Page 27 of 32 ceAnalytical is Y'1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 QC Batch: OEXT/30256 Analysis Method: WI MOD DRO QC Batch Method: WI MOD DRO Analysis Description: WIDRO GCS Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691002, 10316691003, 10316691004 METHOD BLANK: 2041056 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 10316691001, 10316691002, 10316691003, 10316691004 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed WDRO C10-C28 mg/kg NO 10.0 08/O6/1516:23 n-Triacontane (S) %. 82 50-150 081D6/15 16:23 Qualifiers LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE 8 LCSD: 2041057 2041058 Spike LCS LCSD LCS LCSD % Rec Max Parameter Units Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qualifiers WDRO CIO-C28 mg/kg 80 92.8 76.9 116 96 70-120 19 20 n-Triacontane(S) %. 119 93 50-150 Results Presented on this page sm In the units indicated by Me'Units" column except whore on alternate unit is meeente t to the right of the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in Tull, Date: 08/11/2015 08:37 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 28 of 32 /�MAnalytical e aww.peoekbs.com , ..._.. ,... . 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALIFIERS Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316691 DEFINITIONS OF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot. NO - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit. PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit. RL - Reporting Limit. S - Surrogate 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is a combined concentration. Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for each analyte is a combined concentration. Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. TNI -The NELAC Institute. WORKORDER QUALIFIERS W0: 10316691 [1] Samples were received outside of the recommended temperature range of 0-6 degrees Celsius. The samples were received from the field on ice, indicating the cool down process had begun. ANALYTE QUALIFIERS 1 M The sample could not achieve the 1:1 ratio of soil to methanol due to excessive sample weight. D4 Sample was diluted due to the presence of high levels of target analytes. M1 Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. P3 Sample extract could not be concentrated to the routine final volume, resulting in elevated reporting limits. P8 Anayte was detected in the method blank. All associated samples had concentrations of at least ten times greater than the blank or were below the reporting limit. R1 RPD value was outside control limits. SO Surrogate recovery outside laboratory control limits. S2 Surrogate recovery outside laboratory control limits due to matrix interferences (confirmed by similar results from sample re -analysis). T6 High boiling point hydrocarbons are present in the sample. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/11/2015 08:37 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 29 of 32 ��. +'irtpewkGttom 1700 Elm Street - Suite Z00 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Project: Pace Project No.: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schoid 10316691 Analytical Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method Batch 10316691001 GP-1 1.5' WI MOD DRO OEXT/30256 WI MOD DRO GCSV/16401 10316691002 GP-1 21' WI MOD DRO OEXT/30256 WI MOD DRO GCSWI6401 10316691003 GP-2 1.5' WI MOD DRO OEXT/30256 WI MOD DRO GCSV/16401 10316691004 GP-2 23' WI MOD DRO OEXT/30256 WI MOD DRO GCSV/16401 10316691001 GP-1 1.5' EPA 5030 Medium Soil GCV/14185 WI MOD GRO GCV/14196 10316691002 GP-1 21' EPA 5030 Medium Soil GCV/14185 WI MOD GRO GCW14196 10316691003 GP-2 1.5' EPA 5030 Medium Soil GCV/14185 WI MOD GRO GCW14196 10316691004 GP-2 23' EPA 5030 Medium Soil GCV/14185 WI MOD GRO GCV/14196 10316691005 Trip Blanks EPA 5030 Medium Soil GCV/14185 WI MOD GRO GCV/14196 10316691001 GP-1 Is EPA 3050 MPRP/56705 EPA 6010C ICP/24831 10316691003 GP-2 1.5' EPA 3050 MPRP/56705 EPA 6010C ICP/24831 10316691001 GP-11.5' EPA 7471B MERP/14420 EPA 7471B MERC/16819 10316691003 GP-2 1.5' EPA 7471B MERP/14420 EPA 7471B MERC/16819 10316691001 GP-1 1.5' ASTM D2974 MPRP/56697 10316691003 GP-2 1.5' ASTM D2974 MPRP/56697 10316691004 GP-2 23' ASTM D2974 MPRP/56697 10316691001 GP-1 1.5' EPA 3550 OEXT/30270 EPA 8270D by SIM MSSV/12859 10316691003 GP-2 1.5' EPA 3550 OEXT/30270 EPA 8270D by SIM MSSWI2859 10316691001 GP-1 1.5' EPA 5035/5030B MSV/32640 EPA 8260E MSV/32656 10316691002 GP-1 21' EPA 5035/5030B MSV/32640 EPA 8260B MSV/32656 10316691003 GP-2 1.5' EPA 5035/5030B MSV/32640 EPA 8260B MSV/32656 103166910D4 GP-2 23' EPA 5035/5030B MSV/32640 EPA 8260B MSV/32656 10316691005 Trip Blanks EPA 5035/5030B MSV/32640 EPA 8260B MSV/32656 Date: 08/11 /2015 08:37 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Ana"i;al Services, Inc.. Page 30 of 32 6 hceAnapical a aaa.paaelaas.aom Section A Required Client Infowebw: GMAIN-OF-GUSTODY / Analytical Request Document The Chain -of -Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be completed accurately. Section B Section C R"uhaC Project Informobon: Invpica InMrmetlnm LAn I: / of 1 1715047 yr REGULATORY AGENCY AAddrr ess: NPDES '1- GROUNDWATER i DRINKING WATER E o: Purchase Order No.: Pace QuoN t- UST RCRA r- OTHER r- Refaanca: Poi r� 3 ➢n- J: p Projec Name: A 4, t- ` . l j M 'au ' ^ \� ' - - site Loeatlon section D Ill codes Required Clieminr A. MATRIX I CODE n COLLECTED Preservatives Drlmdnp Water DW U Water WT Waste Wetar WW m COMPOamE cauPoslre Product P Q eTMT ENM/ SdMolid SL U6' N SAMPLE ID 011� OL VVP (A-Z, D-9 /:) Air AR p a Z F Sample IDs MUST BE UNIQUE Tissue TS O O Other OT TDATET,,E Q X w w 0 w < G LL O c y Z U DATE TIME ! Z310- 2 y I Z.S- a 1 i 37cl ITT \O ADDITIONAL COMMENTS REUNIQUISNEDBY f AFFILIATION. DATE TIME ACCEPTED BY I AFFILIATION DATE TIME SAMPLE CONDITIONS f-) nIJ It dw01)" I % 3 I jf�G .? �— Aw K.\ U �2 ORIGINAL PRINT Name of SAMPLER: O M. Ite- SIGNATUREof"INIPLER: N) -,pater Nom: By sir1r, dda Po you am acoptlrp P"', NET W day payment term. end agmel, N W. Wrpae of 1.5% par molds tram M dk a mt paN as 30 days. l - -- -- - --- . Document Name: Document Revised 23Feb2015 Sample Condition Upon Receipt Form Page 1 of 1 dCBMafyhr<3I Document No-: Issuing Authority: F-MNd-213-rev.13 Pace Minnesota QualdyOffice Client Name: Project #: Courier: QFed Ex naps QUSPS .lent Commercial Opace ❑.SpeeDee []Other:_ Tracking Number: Custody Seal on Cooler/Box Present? 0-yes L` Ko Seals Intact? Oyes L.�V opnorwV. ri of rue udte: rrol. rvame: Packing Material: Lgeubble Wrap ❑Bubble Bags ❑None ❑Other. _ Temp Blank? 13yes lU° Thermometer ❑BR8A91305164li ❑BS$A91216750d ,��,,//'' l�/'� d/Y Used: �gA0143i1009ft Type of Ice: lgwet ❑Blue ❑Nayempies on ice, rooting process has begun Cooler Temp Read ('C): Cooler Temp Corrected ('C): (51.S Biological Tissue Frozen? E]Yes EJNo t/A Temp should be above If i to 6'C Correction Factor: ,�� _ Date and initials of Person Examining Contents: USDA Regulated Soil ( /A, water sample) Did samples originate in a quarantine zone within the United States: Al, AR, AZ; CA, FL, GA, ID, LA. Did samples originate hum a foreign source (internationally, MS, NC, NM, NY, OK, OR, SC, TN, TX or WA (check maps)? []Yes QNo ; inding Hawaii and Puerto Rico)? ❑Yes ONO H Yes to either question, fdl out a Regulated Soil Checklist (F-MN-Q336) and include with SOUR/COC paperwork. COMMENTS: Chain Of Custody Present? es []No ❑N/A 1. Chain of Custody Filled Out? es [:IN. ❑N/A 2. Chain of Custody Relinquished? ❑No ❑NSA 3. Sampler Name and/or Signature on COC? Yes ❑No ❑N/a 4. Samples Arrived within Hold Time? es ❑N/a S. Short Hold Time Analysis (<72 hr)? Ores J�No ❑NIA 6. Rush Tom Around Time Requested? ,��_J,,r//to b�No ❑N/A 7. Sufficient Volume? .❑,.yeess Oyes No ❑NIA S. -- — ---_ — — Correct Containers Used? 21e6 []NO ❑N/A 9. -Pace Containers Used? )Yes []NO ❑N/A Containers Intact? UK, ONO ❑N.//A 10. Filtered Volume Received for Dissolved Tests? ❑Yes �Q/a 11. Note iif♦sediment is visible in the dissolved container Sample Labels Match COC? ❑Yes KN. pNo ❑N/A 12. DO CC Qr- ". W ej 1 '� T —' n rc%:5 -Includes Oate/Time/ID/Analysis All containers needing acid/base preservation have been 13. ❑HNOi ❑HzSO, ❑NaOH ❑HCI checked? ❑Yes ❑Nc N/A All containers needing preservation are found to be in Sample p compliance with EPA recommendation? (HNO, H,SOa, HCI<2; NaOH >9 Sulfide, NaOH>12 Cyanide) ❑yes []NO W11A Exceptions: VOA, Cokform, TOC, Oil and Grease, kdill al when Lot q of added DRO/5015 (water) DOC I ❑Yes ONO MKA completed:______ preservative:_ Headspace in VOA Vials ( >6mm)? ❑Yes DN. 14. Trip Blank Present? QYes ONO )]00 15. _ Trip Blank Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes [IN. A Pace Trip Blank Lot K (if purchased): CUENT NOTIFICATION/RESOLUTION Person Contacted: Comments/Resolution: Project Manager Review: Note: whenever there is a discrepancy affeChr h Ca Olin. hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers), Date/Time: will besent to Field Data Required? QYes DNO Office ( Le out of Page 32 of 32 1�cehlalytical sws:paoelebacwn race wnaryecai aemces, mc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 August 06, 2015 Kevin Pierson The Javelin Group 10125 Crosstown Circle Suite 107 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Project: 2015-POI22-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Dear Kevin Pierson: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on August 03, 2015. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Kabor Xiong kabor.xiong@pacelabs.com Project Manager Endosures REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, wOhout the written consent of Pace Analocal Services, Inc.. Page 1 of 20 ��ceAnalytical emw.pacalabs.cnm i i race nuayucar services, Inc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 Project: 2015•PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Minnesota Certification IDs 1700 Elm Street SE Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55414 A&A Certification #: 2926.01 Alaska Certification #: UST-078 Alaska Certification #MN00064 Alabama Certification #40770 Arizona Certification #: AZ-0014 Arkansas Certification #: 88-0680 California Certification #: 01155CA Colorado Certification #Pace Connecticut Certification #: PH-0256 EPA Region 8 Certification #: 8TMS-L Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87605 Guam Certification #:14-008r Georgia Certification #: 959 Georgia EPD M Pace Idaho Certification #: MN00064 Hawaii Certification #MN00064 Illinois Certification #: 200011 Indiana Certification#C-MN-01 Iowa Certification M 368 Kansas Certification #: E-10167 Kentucky Dept of Envi. Protection - DW #90062 Kentucky Dept of Envi. Protection - WW #:90062 Louisiana DEO Certification #: 3086 Louisiana DHH #: LA140001 Maine Certification #: 2013011 Maryland Certification #: 322 Michigan DEPH Certification #: 9909 CERTIFICATIONS Minnesota Certification #: 027-053-137 Mississippi Certification M Pace Montana Certification #: MT0092 Nevada Certification #: MN 00064 Nebraska Certification #: Pace New Jersey Certification M MN-002 New York Certification M 11647 North Carolina Certification M 530 North Carolina State Public Health M 27700 North Dakota Certification #: R-036 Ohio EPA#: 4150 Ohio VAP Certification #: CL101 Oklahoma Certification #: 9507 Oregon Certification #: MN200001 Oregon Certification #: MN300001 Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-00563 Puerto Rico Certification Saipan (CNMI) #:MP0003 South Carolina #:74003001 Texas Certification M T104704192 Tennessee Certification #: 02818 Utah Certification #: MN000642013-4 Virginia DGS Certification #: 251 VirginialVELAP Certification #: Pace Washington Certification #: C486 West Virginia Certification M 382 West Virginia DHHR #:9952C Wisconsin Certification M 999407970 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the mitten consent of Pare Analocal Services, Inc.. Page 2 of 20 ��aceAnayicafe arwpecelabs.corn race nnaryucai ae"Ims, inc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607.1700 Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Lab ID Sample ID 10316659001 SV-14' 10316659002 SV-2 4' SAMPLE SUMMARY Matrix Date Collected Date Received Air 08/03/1512:40 08/03/1516:01 Air 08/0311513:40 08/0311516:01 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 3 of 20 Analytical* N+rw.p+cele0.xcam 1700 Elm Street - Sure 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)6071700 Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316669 Lab ID Sample ID 10316659001 SV-14' 10316659002 SV-2 4' SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT Method TO-15 TO-15 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytes Analysts Reported MJL 61 MJL 61 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 4 of 20 V`1700 Elm Street- Suite 200 aceAnalytical Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)807-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-POI22-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Date: August 06, 2015 SV-1 4' (Lab ID: 10316659001) Kt: The Total Hydrocarbon (THC) pattern occured in the first half of the chromatogram (before toluene). SV-2 4' (Lab ID: 10316659002) K3: The Total Hydrocarbon (THC) pattern is evenly distributed throughout the chromatogram (before and after toluene). REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 5 of 20 1 �ceAnaljftal e sroa:paceleDsoom i race nnaryucar aervims, Ina. 1700 Elm Street - Suite �00 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Method: TO-15 Description: T015 MSVAIR Client: The Javelin Group Date: August 06, 2015 General Information: 2 samples were analyzed for TO-15. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain -of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold limes with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. QC Batch: AIR/23844 SS: This analyte did not meet the secondary source verification criteria for the initial calibration. The reported result should be considered an estimated value. • DUP (Lab ID: 2041811) • Naphthalene • LCS (Lab ID: 2041180) • 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene • Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene • Naphthalene • SV-2 4' (Lab ID: 10316659002) • Naphthalene Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. QC Batch: AIR/23844 CH: The continuing calibration for this compound is outside of Pace Analytical acceptance limits. The results may be biased high. • DUP (Lab ID: 2041811) • Ethanol • LCS (Lab ID: 2041180) • Ethanol • SV-2 4' (Lab ID: 10316659002) • Ethanol Internal Standards: All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Duplicate Sample: All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 6 of 20 /� race nnaryucai services, inc. 1 J74e d/t lyflca' a 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 ��/��, ��*** �r�uod Minneapolis, MN 65414 •'e'w:paceMbacorn j (612)807-1700 PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Method: TO-15 Description: T015 MSV AIR Client: The Javelin Group Date: August 06, 2015 OC Batch: AIR/23844 R1: RPD value was outside control limits. • DUP (Lab ID: 2041811) • Ethanol • n-Heptane Additional Comments: Anatyte Comments: QC Batch: AIR/23844 E: Analyte concentration exceeded the calibration range. The reported result is estimated. • DUP (Lab ID: 2041811) • Acetone SV-2 4' (Lab ID: 10316659002) • Acetone This data package has been reviewed for quality and completeness and is approved for release. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproouced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Ana"cal Services, Inc.. Page 7 of 20 �Anaocal' Mw:Pace�eDscrom raw nnaryucn aarncea, mc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Sample: SV-1 4' Lab ID: 10316659001 Collected: 08/03/15 12:40 Received: 08/03/15 16:01 Matra: Air Report Parameters Results Units Lim@ MDL OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual T015 MSV AIR Analytical Method: TO-15 Acetone 180 ug/m3 26.0 9.0 10.79 08/05/1514:10 67-64-1 Benzene 7.3 ug/m3 0.52 0.20 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 7143-2 Benzyl chloride NO ug/m3 1.7 0.27 1.61 08104/1520:50 10044-7 Bromodichloromethane NO ug/m3 2.2 0.31 1.61 08/04/1520:50 75-274 Bromoform ND ug/m3 3.4 1.5 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 75-25-2 Bromomethane ND ug/m3 1.3 0.50 1.61 08104/1520:50 74-83-9 1,3-Butadiene NO ug/m3 0.72 0.28 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 106-99-0 2-Butanone (MEK) 16.1 ug/m3 0.97 0.37 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 78-93-3 Carbon disulfide 4.9 ug/m3 1.0 0.16 1.61 08104/1520:50 75-15-0 Carbon telrachlonde NO ug/m3 1.0 0.31 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO ug/m3 1.5 0.22 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 108-90-7 Chloroethane NO ug/m3 0.87 0.31 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 75-00-3 Chloroform NO ug/m3 0.80 0.31 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 67-66-3 Chloromethane 2.1 ug/m3 0.68 0.17 1.61 08/0411520:50 74-87-3 Cyclohexane 5.5 ug/m3 1.1 0.51 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 110-82-7 Dibromochloromethane NO ug/m3 2.8 1.4 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 12448-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND ug/m3 2.5 1.2 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 106-934 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 2.0 0.82 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/m3 2.0 0.85 1.61 08/04/1520:50 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/m3 2.0 0.80 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 10646-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.3 ug/m3 1.6 0.77 1.61 08/04/1520:50 75-71-8 1,1-Dichlorothane NO ug/m3 1.3 0.25 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 75-34-3 1,2-Dichlorcethane NO ug/m3 0.66 0.33 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene NO ug/m3 1.3 0.38 1.61 _ 08/04/15 20:50 75-354 cis-1,2-Dichlorolhene NO ug/m3 1.3 0.40 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichlorcethene ND ug/m3 1.3 0.62 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/m3 1.5 0.43 1.61 08104/1520:50 78-87-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO ug/m3 1.5 0.59 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO ug/m3 1.5 0.42 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 10061-02-6 Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ND ug/m3 2.3 0.50 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 76-14-2 Ethanol 397 ug/m3 10.4 2.9 10.79 08/0511514:10 64-17-5 Ethyl acetate 1.3 ug/m3 1.2 0.56 1.61 08/04115 20:50 141-78-6 Ethylbenzene 2.0 ug/m3 1.4 0.68 1.61 OB/04115 20:50 100414 4-Ethyltoluene ND ug/m3 1.6 0.30 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 622-96-8 n-Heptane 6.2 ug/m3 1.3 0.45 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 142-82-5 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene NO ug/m3 3.5 1.0 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 87-68-3 n-Hexane 32.2 ug/m3 7.8 3.9 10.79 08/0511514:10 110-54-3 2-Hexanone ND ug/m3 1.3 0.66 1.61 08104/1520:50 591-78-6 Methylene Chloride 49.4 ug/m3 38.1 5.8 10.79 08/05/15 14:10 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) NO ug/m3 1.3 0.35 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether NO ug/m3 1.2 0.49 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 1634-044 Naphthalene ND ug/m3 4.3 0.49 1.61 08104/1520:50 91-20-3 2-Propanol ND ug/m3 2.0 0.39 1.61 08104/1520:50 67-63-0 Propylene 269 ug/m3 3.8 1.5 10.79 OB/05/1514:10 115-07-1 Styrene NO ug/m3 1.4 0.31 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 10042-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO ug/m3 1A 0.53 1.61 OB/04/15 20:50 79-34-5 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/06/2015 09:50 AM without the written consent of Pace Analydcel Services, Inc.. Page 8 of 20 /%�ceAnaocal e eww.paoNrbsoum race nuaryucai aemcas, mc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Sample: SV-1 4' Lab ID: 10316659001 Collected: 08/03/15 12:40 Received: 08/03/15 16:01 Matrix: Air Report Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual T015 MSV AIR Analytical Method: TO-15 Tetrachloroethene ND ug/m3 1.1 0.45 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 127-18-4 Tetrahydrofuran ND ug/m3 0.97 0.19 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 109-99-9 Toluene 15.7 ug/m3 1.2 0.25 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 108-88-3 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 6.1 1.5 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 120-82-1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 1.8 0.40 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 0.89 0.40 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 79-00-5 Trichloroethene ND ug/m3 0.89 0.44 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane 2.1 ug/m3 1.8 0.21 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 75-69-4 1,1,2-Tdchlorotrifluoroethane ND ug/m3 2.6 0.48 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 76-13-1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.9 ug/m3 1.6 0.20 1.61 0810411520:50 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND ug/m3 1.6 0.29 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 108-67-8 Vinyl acetate 4.3 ug/m3 1.2 0.53 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 108-054 Vinyl chloride ND ug/m3 0.42 0.31 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 75-014 m&p-Xylene 5.1 ug/m3 2.8 1.3 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 179601-23-1 o-Xylene 1.8 ug/m3 1.4 0.57 1.61 08/04/15 20:50 9547-6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/06/2015 09:50 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 9 of 20 •'Ma'-01x+sYbscom race nnmyucs aeincaa, mc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Sample: SV-2 4' Lab ID: 10316659002 Collected: 08/03/15 13:40 Received: 08/03/15 16:01 Matrix: Air Report Parameters Results Units Limit MOIL OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual T015 MSV AIR Analytical Method: TO-15 Acetone 221 ug/m3 3.7 1.3 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 67-64-1 E Benzene 3.7 ug/m3 0.50 0.19 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 71-43-2 Benzyl chloride NO ug/m3 1.6 0.26 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 100-44-7 Bromodichloromethane NO ug/m3 2.1 0.30 1.55 08/0411519:42 75-27-4 Bromoform ND ug/m3 3.3 1 A 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 75-25-2 Bromomethane ND ug/m3 1.2 0.48 1.55 08/04/1519:42 74-83-9 1,3-Butadiene NO ug/m3 0.70 0.27 1.55 08/0411519:42 106-99-0 2-Butanone (MEK) 33.3 ug/m3 0.93 0.35 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 78-93-3 Carbon disulfide 1.7 ug/m3 0.98 0.16 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 75-15-0 Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/m3 0.99 0.30 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene ND ug/m3 1.5 0.21 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 108-90-7 Chloroethane ND ug/m3 0.84 0.30 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 75-00-3 Chloroform NO ug/m3 0.77 0.29 1.55 0810411519:42 67-66-3 Chloromethane 1.6 ug/m3 0.65 0.17 1.55 08/0411519:42 74-87-3 Cyclohexane 1.1 ug/m3 1.1 0.49 1.55 0810411519:42 110-82-7 Dibromochloromethane NO ug/m3 2.7 1.3 1.55 08/04/1519:42 12448-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) NO ug/m3 2.4 1.2 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 106-93-4 1.2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 1.9 0.79 1.55 08104/1519:42 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 6.2 ug/m3 1.9 0.82 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 1.9 0.77 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 10646-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.7 ug/m3 1.6 0.74 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane NO ug/m3 1.3 0.24 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane NO ug/m3 0.64 0.32 1.55 08104/1519:42 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene NO ug/m3 1.3 0.37 1.55 08104/1519:42 75-354 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/m3 1.3 0.38 1.55 08/04/1519:42 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO ug/m3 1.3 0.60 1.55 08104/1519:42 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane NO ug/m3 1.5 0.42 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 78-87-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO ug/m3 1.4 0.57 1.55 OB/04/1519:42 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO ug/m3 1.4 0.40 1.55 08104/1519:42 10061-02-6 Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ND ug/m3 2.2 0.48 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 76-14-2 Ethanol 81.5 ug/m3 1.5 0.41 1.55 08104/1519:42 64-17-5 CH Ethyl acetate ND ug/m3 1.1 0.54 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 141-78-6 Ethylbenzene 1.4 ug/m3 1.4 0.66 1.55 08104/1519:42 100-41A 4-Ethyltoluene NO ug/m3 1.6 0.29 1.55 08/04/1519:42 622-96-8 n-Heptane 3.3 ug/m3 1.3 0.43 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 142-82-5 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ND ug/m3 3.4 1.0 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 87-68-3 n-Hexane 8.4 ug/m3 1.1 0.55 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 110-54-3 2-Hexanone 4.0 ug/m3 1.3 0.64 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 591-78-6 Methylene Chloride ND ug/m3 5.5 0.84 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 1.6 ug/m3 1.3 0.34 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether NO ug/m3 1.1 0.47 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 1634-04-4 Naphthalene 8.3 ug/m3 4.1 0.47 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 91-20-3 SS 2-Propanol 7.3 ug/m3 1.9 0.37 1.55 08104/1519:42 67-63-0 Propylene 61.6 ug/m3 0.54 0.21 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 115-07-1 Styrene ND ug/m3 1.3 0.30 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 10042-5 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachlorcethane ND ug/m3 1.1 0.51 1.56 08/0411519:42 79-34-5 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/06/2015 09:50 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 10 of 20 �aceAnalytical � �rrpacalabacpn r 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 2015-P0122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Sample: SV-2 4' Lab ID: 10316659002 Collected: 08/03/15 13:40 Received: 08/03/15 16:01 Matrix: Air Report Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Oual T015 MSV AIR Analytical Method: TO-15 Tetrachloroethene ND ug/m3 1.1 0.43 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 127-18-4 Tetrahydrofuran ND ug/m3 0.93 0.18 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 109-99-9 Toluene 4.0 ug/m3 1.2 0.24 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 108-88-3 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/m3 5.8 1.4 1.55 08/04/1519:42 120-82-1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 1.7 0.38 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/m3 0.85 0.38 1.55 08/04/1519:42 79-00-5 Trichloroethene ND ug/m3 0.85 0.43 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/m3 1.8 0.20 1.55 08104/1519:42 75-69-4 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND ug/m3 2.5 0.47 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 76-13-1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.7 ug/m3 1.5 0.19 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND ug/m3 1.5 0.28 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 108-67-8 Vinyl acetate 4.6 ug/m3 1.1 0.51 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride ND ug/m3 0.40 0.30 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 75-01-4 m&p-Xylene 3.3 ug/m3 2.7 1.2 1.55 08/04/15 19:42 179601-23-1 o-Xylene ND ug/m3 1.4 0.54 1.55 08104/1519:42 95-47-6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/06/2015 09:50 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 11 of 20 /�ceAnaCytical' racy nnmyucer aemces, mu. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-POl 22-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 QC Batch: AIR/23844 Analysis Method: TO-15 QC Batch Method: TO-15 Analysis Description: T015 MSV AIR Low Level Associated Lab Samples: 10316659001, 10316659002 METHOD BLANK: 2041179 Associated Lab Samples: 10316659001, 10316659002 Parameter Units Matrix: Blank Result Air Reporting Limit Analyzed 1,11-Trichloroethane ug/m3 ND 1.1 08/04/15 12:49 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.70 08/04/15 12:49 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.55 08/04/15 12:49 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/m3 ND 1.6 08/04/15 12:49 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.82 08/04/15 12:49 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/m3 NO 0.81 08/04/1512:49 1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene ug/m3 NO 3.8 08/04/1512:49 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 ND 1.0 08/0411512:49 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ug/m3 ND 1.6 08/04/15 12:49 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 ND 1.2 08/04/15 12:49 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.41 08/04/15 12:49 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/m3 ND 0.94 08/04/15 12:49 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 ND 1.0 08/04/15 12:49 1,3-Butadiene ug/m3 ND 0.45 08/04/1512:49 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 ND 1.2 08/04/1512:49 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 NO 1.2 08/04/1512:49 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/m3 ND 0.60 08/04/15 12:49 2-Hexanone ug/m3 ND 0.83 08/04/15 12:49 2-Propanol ug/m3 ND 1.2 08/04/15 12:49 4-Ethyltoluene ug/m3 ND 1.0 08104/1512:49 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) ug/m3 ND 0.83 08/04/15 12:49 Acetone ug/m3 ND 2.4 08/0411512:49 Benzene ug/m3 ND 0.32 08/04/15 12:49 Benzyl chloride ug/m3 ND 1.0 08/04/15 12:49 Bromodichloromethane ug/m3 NO 1.4 08/04/15 12:49 Bromoforrn ug/m3 ND 2.1 08/04/1512:49 Bromomethane ug/m3 ND 0.79 08/04/1512:49 Carbon disulfide ug/m3 ND 0.63 08/04/15 12:49 Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 ND 0.64 08104/15 12:49 Chlorobenzene ug/m3 ND 0.94 08/04/1512:49 Chloroethane ug/m3 ND 0.54 08104/1512:49 Chloroform ug/m3 ND 0.50 08/04/15 12:49 Chloromethane ug/m3 ND 0.42 08/04/1512:49 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 NO 0.81 08/04/15 12:49 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 NO 0.92 08/0411512:49 Cyclohexane ug/m3 ND 0.70 08/04/15 12:49 Dibromochloromethane ug/m3 ND 1.7 08104/1512:49 Dichlorodltluoromethane ug/m3 ND 1.0 08/04/15 12:49 Dichlorotetrafluorcethane ug/m3 ND 1.4 08/04/1512:49 Ethanol ug/m3 ND 0.96 08/04/15 12:49 Ethyl acetate ug1m3 ND 0.73 08/04/15 12:49 Qualifiers Results presented on this page are In Me units IndiuteA by the "Units" column except where an ettemHe unit Is presented to Me right of are null REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/0612015 09:50 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 12 of 20 % aceAnalyticalo www.pscdabs.tom race nnaryucar services, Inc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-POt22-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 METHOD BLANK: 2041179 Matrix: Air Associated Lab Samples: 10316659001, 10316659002 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Ethylbenzene ug/m3 NO 0.88 08/04/1512:49 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/m3 NO 2.2 08/0411512:49 m8p-Xylene ug/m3 NO 1.8 08/0411512:49 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/m3 NO 0.73 08/04115 12:49 Methylene Chloride ug/m3 NO 3.5 08/04/15 12:49 n-Heptane ug/m3 NO 0.83 08104/1512:49 n-Hexane ug/m3 NO 0.72 08/0411512:49 Naphthalene ug/m3 NO 2.7 08/04/1512:49 o-Xylene ug/m3 NO 0.88 08/0411512:49 Propylene ug/m3 NO 0.35 0810411512:49 Styrene ug/m3 NO 0.87 08104/1512:49 Tetrachloroethene ug/m3 NO 0.69 08/04/15 12:49 Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3 NO 0.60 08/0411512:49 Toluene ug/m3 NO 0.77 OB/04/1512:49 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 NO 0.81 08/04/15 12:49 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 NO 0.92 08/04/1512:49 Tichooroethene ug/m3 NO 0.55 0810411512:49 Trichlorofiuoromethane ug/m3 NO 1.1 08104/1512:49 Vinyl acetate ug/m3 NO 0.72 08/04/15 12:49 Vinyl chloride ug/m3 NO 0.26 08/0411512:49 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2041180 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/m3 55.5 53.9 97 72-140 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/m3 69.8 63.8 91 68-137 1.1,2-Trichloroethane ug/m3 55.5 55.7 100 66-138 1,1,2-Trichlorotrlfiuoroethane ug/m3 77.9 76.2 98 70-132 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/m3 41.2 39.4 96 68-137 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/m3 40.3 39.3 98 73-138 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/m3 75.5 66.3 88 48-150 SS 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 50 47.7 95 75-134 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ug/m3 78.1 80.0 102 75-132 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 61.2 56.6 93 71-129 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/m3 41.2 41.4 101 73-139 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/m3 47 44.7 95 70-130 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 50 46.3 93 75-133 1,3-Butadiene ug/m3 22.5 23.4 104 66-135 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 61.2 59.5 97 75-131 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 61.2 57.2 94 69-135 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/m3 30 30.6 102 67-131 2-Hexanone ug/m3 41.7 43.5 104 72-130 2-Propanol ug/m3 25 26.8 107 66-133 4-Ethyftoluene ug/m3 50 48.2 96 75-130 Results presenteci on this page are In the units Indicated by the "Units' column except where an alternate unit is presented to the fight of the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/062015 09:50 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 13 Of 20 ��ceAnalytical I twwyaceln65com 1700 Elm Street - Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-POI22-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2041180 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) ug/m3 41.7 40.6 97 68-134 Acetone ug/m3 24.2 20.5 85 63-144 Benzene ug/m3 32.5 31.8 98 64-139 Benzyl chloride ug/m3 52.5 49.2 94 75-129 Bromodichloromethane ug/m3 68.2 67.7 99 75-134 Bromoform ug/m3 105 107 102 72-130 Bromomethane ug/m3 39.5 38.6 98 71-132 Carbon disulfide ug/m3 31.7 29.1 92 56-139 Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 64 63.3 99 75-150 Chlorobenzene ug/m3 46.8 46.1 98 71-132 Chloroethane ug/m3 26.8 26.0 97 71-129 Chloroform ug/m3 49.7 48.6 98 73-136 Chloromethane ug/m3 21 20.7 99 52-143 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 40.3 40.2 100 64-137 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 46.2 48.2 104 75-128 Cyclohexane ug/m3 35 32.2 92 62-143 Dibromochloromethane ug/m3 86.6 88.6 102 75-136 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/m3 50.3 49.8 99 70-141 Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ug/m3 71.1 70.1 99 71-139 Ethanol ug/m3 19.2 25.1 131 60-144 CH Ethyl acetate ug/m3 36.6 35.4 97 64-137 Ethylbenzene ug/m3 44.2 43.1 98 71-136 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/m3 108 90.1 83 51-150 SS m8.p-Xylene ug/m3 88.3 85.9 97 71-134 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/m3 36.7 34.9 95 73-134 Methylene Chloride ug/m3 35.3 32.6 92 64-130 n-Heptane ug/m3 41.7 39.2 94 63-135 n-Hexane ug/m3 35.8 34.9 97 69-135 Naphthalene ug/m3 53.3 41.6 78 43-150 SS c-Xylene ug/m3 44.2 42.3 96 75-134 Propylene ug/m3 17.5 14.6 84 58-135 Styrene ug/m3 43.3 43.5 100 75-133 Tetrachloroethene ug/m3 69 67.3 98 66-137 Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3 30 29.0 97 58-135 Toluene ug/m3 38.3 32.9 86 70-129 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 40.3 41.0 102 61-140 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 46.2 50.0 108 75-134 Trichloroethene ug/m3 54.6 56.0 103 70-134 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/m3 57.1 56.3 98 67-140 Vinyl acetate ug/m3 35.8 34.9 98 60-139 Vinyl chloride ug/m3 26 25.9 100 72-129 Results presented on Mis page arc in the units indicat by Me "Units" column except where an ahemate unit Is presented to the right of the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/06/2015 09:50 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 14 of 20 ��ceAnalydcale wr'.Peoalebccdn r acv Hoary uses uenmea, mc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2041811 Parameter Units 10316659002 Result Cup Result RPD Max RPD Qualifiers 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorcethane ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,1,2-Trichlorotri8uoroethane ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/m3 ND ND P8 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 1.7 1.7 2 48 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 ND ND 28 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,3-Butadiene ug/m3 ND ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 6.2 6.1 1 25 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/m3 ND ND 25 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/m3 33.3 34.4 3 25 2-Hexanone ug/m3 4.0 4.0 0 25 2-Propanol ug/m3 7.3 6.7 9 25 4-EthyRoluene ug/m3 ND 1.51 25 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) ug/m3 1.6 1.6 0 25 Acetone ug/m3 221 225 2 25 E Benzene ug/m3 3.7 3.8 3 25 Benzyl chloride ug/m3 ND ND 25 Bromodichloromethane ug/m3 ND ND 25 Bromoform ug/m3 ND ND 25 Bromomethane ug/m3 ND ND 25 Carbon disulfide ug/m3 1.7 1.8 7 P5 Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 ND ND 25 Chlorobenzene ug/m3 ND ND 25 Chloroethane ug/m3 ND ND 25 Chloroform ug/m3 ND ND 25 Chloromethane ug/m3 1.6 1.6 2 25 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 ND ND 25 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 ND ND 25 Cyclohexane ug/m3 1.1 1.2 9 25 Dibromochloromethane ug/m3 ND ND 25 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/m3 1.7 1.7 0 25 Dichlorotetrafluoroethane ug/m3 ND ND 25 Ethanol ug/m3 81.5 62.2 27 25 CH,R1 Ethyl acetate ug/m3 ND ND 25 Ethylbenzene ug/m3 1.4 1.4 1 25 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/m3 ND ND 25 m&p-Xylene ug/m3 3.3 3.3 0 25 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/m3 ND ND 25 Methylene Chloride ug/m3 ND 1.91 25 n-Heptane ug/m3 3.3 2.5 27 25 R1 Results Presented on this page an In the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an altemate unit is presented to Me right of Me esun. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/06/2015 09:50 AM without the wnden consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 15 of 20 /�KceAnalytical" wwtxpao9lahascsn i OI.vN ol)irval...... ve, 1111. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 2015-POI22-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2041811 Parameter Units 10316659002 Result Dup Result RPD Max RPD Qualifiers n-Hexane ug/m3 8.4 8.5 2 Y5 Naphthalene ug/m3 8.3 8.6 3 25 SS o-Xylene ug1m3 ND 1.2J 25 Propylene ug/m3 61.6 63.0 2 25 Styrene ug/m3 ND 1.11.1 25 Tetrachloroethene ug/m3 ND ND 25 Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3 ND ND 28 Toluene ug/m3 4.0 3.9 1 25 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/m3 ND ND P9 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/m3 ND ND 25 Trichloroethene ug/m3 ND ND 25 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/m3 ND 1AJ 25 Vinyl acetate ug/m3 4.6 4.5 2 25 Vinyl chloride ug/m3 ND ND 25 Resoits prasented en this papa are in the units Indic sta0 by tie "Units" column except where an anemate unit is prase tax! to Me right a the mauh. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/06/2015 09:50 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 16 of 20 / aceAnalytical / wYw.pscerstamm 1 raffia ��aryuur aenwea, mc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALIFIERS Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 DEFINITIONS DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot. ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. MDL-Adjusted Method Detection Limit. PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit. RL - Reporting Limit. S - Surrogate 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is a combined concentration. Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Dt6erence NC - Not Calculable. SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected. N-Ndrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for each analyte is a combined concentration. Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. TNI - The NELAC Institute. SAMPLE QUALIFIERS Sample: 10316659001 Ill The Total Hydrocarbon (THC) pattern occured in the first hall of the chromatogram (before toluene). Sample: 10316659002 Ill The Total Hydrocarbon (THC) pattern is evenly distributed throughout the chromatogram (before and after toluene). ANALYTE QUALIFIERS CH The continuing calibration for this compound is outside of Pace Analytical acceptance limits. The results may be biased high. E Anayte concentration exceeded the calibration range. The reported result is estimated. R1 RPD value was outside control limits. SS This analyte did not meet the secondary source verification criteria for the initial calibration. The reported result should be considered an estimated value. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/06/2015 09:50 AM without the wntten consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 17 of 20 , �ceAnalytical e mvw.pscde6s.can race nuaryucm anrrrces, inc. 1700 Elm Street - Suite too Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Project: 2015-PO122-0024 Randy Schold Pace Project No.: 10316659 Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method 10316659001 10316659002 SV-14' SV-24' TO-15 TO-15 AIR/23844 AIR/23844 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Analytical Batch This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 08/06/2015 09:50 AM without the written consent of Pace Anaytiml Services, Inc.. Page 18 of 20 (J 5-1' ceAnalytical" ' aaT.pacelaas.cpm AIR. CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY I Analytical Request Document The Chain -of -Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be completed amuralely. aecnon A Rrad equlClient Infonnalsom Comps Address : Section S Required project Information: Report To: SIP --- Co To: seen C2 Invoice IMomlatlon: non �"�m, Name - — 5 5 3 0 P. e: of Program _ UST SuperNM Emlesbm Clean Air AQ purchase ONer No.: Pace Ouofe Re/erence: � ..... __ _ � — Voluntary Clean Up Dry Clean RCRAillsoon Other Un __._ r Pygo�' Pe/�%' q -...J — Raa �AT. - P Name: a P Nu _ _.__. Pace Project Manager/Sales Rep . _.—._...i am Profile k _ ___ _ 1 ry ..�n 7 d Lacat100 Of I'll, ngAn'_ Sampling by Sta PBV_ PPMV_ r Report LevN III ML_ N._ ghar_ 'Section D Requires Clientkrommnoe AIR SAMPLE ID Sample lDS MUST BE UNIQUE • vWM i-Cm°a MEDIA TB ;�9wm.D. eLllesumm°c.. aw Lvw VOMM Wa LW "o,'�",v"""'°°"" M°p.�... COLLECTED E ^e " !E 2 it p — Summe `,8n Number Flow Control Number Method: ijj /C' Pap Lab M DATE TIME DA E I i I I i Comments: a p SAMPLE CONDITIONS SAMPLER NAME AND SIGNATURE MINT N» dSAMPLER'. 8 (lRl(:INAI $IGNPTURE W SAMR (y@5$ K fff�� DATE 919^ (MM / DD 08 I 1700 Elm Street SE, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55414 Air Technical Phone: 612.607.6386 FC046Rev.01. 03Feb2010 Document Name: 1 0111111111 Client Name: Project #: Courier: El Fed Ex ❑UPS ❑Speedee „Client ❑Commercial ❑Pace ❑Other. Traddng Number: I Pace Minnesota quality Office WO#:10316659 1111111111111111111111116 Custody Seal on Cooler/Rod, Present? []Yes ONO Seals Intact? Dyes xo optional: Proj. Due Date: Pm roj. Nae: Packing Material: ❑Bubble Wrap ❑Bubble Bags Foam ❑None ❑Tin Can 'i❑Other: Temp Blank rec: ❑Yes 060 Temp. (TO17 and T013 samples only) ('C): —Z Corrected Temp ('C): �_ Thermom. Used: ❑888A912167504 ❑72337080 Temp should be above freezing to fi'C Correction Factor. Date 61nkWls of Person Examining Contents: Type of ice Received ❑Blue ❑Wet '-J One stody Present? es No N/A 1. stody Filledout? Yes ❑No ❑N/A 2. stody Relinquished? oSamplesArrived es []No ❑N/A 3. meand/or5i natureon COC? ,1�1es ❑No N/A 4. ved within Hold Time? .{fires ❑No ❑N/A S. rime Analysis (!72 hr)? Yes ,efo ❑N/A 6. Rush Tum Around Time R uested? ❑Yes 4EIfJo ❑N/A 7. Sufficient Volume? ePes ❑NO ❑N/A 8. Correct Containers Used? -Pace Containers Used? 10�es Yes ❑No ONO ❑N/A ❑N/A 9. Containers Int a? e5 []NO ❑N/A 10. Media: it Can Airba Filter TDT Passive 11. Sample Labels Match COC? es ❑No ❑N/A 12. Samples Received: Canisters Canisters Sample Number Can ID Flow Controller ID Sample Number Can ID Flow Controller ID J— 5 as o v CLIENT NOTIFICATION/RESOLUTION Person Contacted: _ Comments/Resolution: Project Manager Re lew: _ Note: Whenever there B a discrepancy affectlr North Camlin hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers) Field Data Required? ❑Yes []No Date/Time: Date: lA.(:LG Li" form will be sent to the Nort ro ina DEHNR Certification Office ( i.e out of Page 20 of 20 0 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL HRGreen 420 North Front Street, Suite 100 McHenry, IL 60050 815.385.1778 To: City of Chanhassen Community Development Department Attn: Mr. Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard Date: March 17, 2016 Job No. 86150413 Re: Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Store #03840 We are sending you the following items: ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ UPS Standard ® UPS Overnight ❑ Delivery ❑ Via Chanhassen, MN 55317 ❑ Shop Drawings ® Prints/Plans ❑ Proposal ❑ Specifications ® Reports ❑ Change Order Copies Date Description 1 Application for Development Review 1 Fee Check #40523 $1,413.00 aid I 15D 4 Title Commitment 4 Legal Description 4 Project Narrative 4 Variance Request Letter 7 Engineering Plans (Cover/Location Map, ALTA Survey, Demo Plan, Site Plan, Grading Plan, Utility Plan, Landscape Plan, Photometric Plan, & AutoTurn Exhibit) (24"x36" 1 Engineering Plans (Cover/Location Map, ALTA Survey, Demo Plan, Site Plan, Grading Plan, Utility Plan, Landscape Plan, Photometric Plan, & AutoTum Exhibit) (8.5"x11° 7 ✓ Architectural Plans (Building Renderings, Rooftop Unit Screening Exhibit, Floor Plan, Black & White Elevations, Colored Elevations, & Refuse Enclosure Detail) 24"x36" 1 Architectural Plans (Building Renderings, Rooftop Unit Screening Exhibit, Floor Plan, Black & White Elevations, Colored Elevations, & Refuse Enclosure Detail) 8.5"x11" 7 Architect Design Intent Package 24"x36° 1 Architect Design Intent Package 8.5°x11" 2 Si na a Package 1 Lighting Fixture Cut Sheets 1 Geotechnical Report 1 Stormwater Report & Calculations 1 SWPPP 1 Material Board 1 -Sample CD(Containing TIFFs of all submittal items) SCANNED page 1 of 2 ❑ For Approval ® For Your Use ❑ As Requested ❑ For Signature ® For Review and Comment ❑ Returning to You ❑ Other (See remarks) Please find attached the above noted information in preparation for the April 19'" Plan Commission Meeting regarding the proposed Chick-fil-A project to be located at 445 West 79" Street. The Lot Consolidation Plat will be submitted to the City in a separate transmittal. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Thank You! Copies to: Signed: Joseph F. Vavrina, P.E. Project Manager Page 2 of 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following two tracts: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating; and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. G17,0 CHANHASSU: RECEIVED MAR 1 b 2U16 CHANHRS$EiV PLANNING DEFT SCANNED 3/16/2016 4:40 PM 01 1 OFC'rlAMJASM I RECEIVED Fidelity National Title MAR 18 2016 r.,o..K cesp.r `qANHMFE PLANNING DFpi Order No.: 237841 2nd AMENDED 2/25/2016 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE 1. Effective Date: October 05, 2015, at 8:00 am Commitment No.: 237841 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Leasehold Owner's Policy - 2006 Proposed Insured: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Amount: $2,575,000.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in the Commitment and covered herein is fee simple and is at the effective date hereof vested in: Chanhassen Shoppes,LLC 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County/Counties of Carver, State of Minnesota, and is described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Note for Information: Property is Abstract Fidelity National Title Insurance Company d --T4"ati Authorized Signature Note: If there are any questions conceming the content of this Commitment, please contact Chris White, the Examiner, at 612-573-2595 or at chdstooher.whiteOcttcom. Note: For assistance in obtaining copies of documents referred to in Schedule B, please contact us at (612) 573-2587 or at COMMERCIALORDERSfu,CTr COM . ALTA Commitment - 2006 Page 1 of 7 Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under-^ license from the American Land Title Association SCANNED Order No.: 237841 Reference No.: atl-151337 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: 1. Instrument creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and filed for record, to -wit: (a) Lease from the party described at Item 3 of Schedule A to the Proposed Insured (Owner). Note: Complete the Minnesota Electronic Certificate of Real Estate Value online at (www.taxes.state.mn.us/crv/) and provide the Company with the following information: a. Receipt number for the Electronic Certificate of Real Estate Value; and b. Printout of the completed Electronic Certificate of Real Estate Value NOTE: The printout must be made when the form is completed. It cannot be accessed after the preparer leaves the system. Once the eCRV is submitted online, the ONLY way to go back in and edit is if you print off or write down the eCRV ID AND the Edit pin (a box pops up with this information as soon as it is submitted). If someone wants to start this ahead of time, they can always save a partial eCRV and come back to it (again as long as they write down the ID number and pin). Note: One of the following statements must be made within the deed: (1) The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property; (2) A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document; or (3) I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. 2. Pay the full consideration to, or for the account, of the grantors or mortgagors. 3. Pay all taxes, charges, assessments, levied and assessed against subject premises, which are due and payable. 4. Tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in the Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. 5. If the transaction is closed by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company or its agents, the Social Security Number of Seller or Federal ID Number of Seller entities and forwarding address must be provided at or prior to closing to comply with the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and the 1099S Form executed at closing unless the Sellers is a corporation or a governmental unit. 6. For all entities CONVEYING, BORROWING OR LEASING, furnish formation and operational documentation and a resolution authorizing the transaction, together with a certificate of good standing from the State in which the entity was created (and in which the property is located, if available); ALTA Commitment - 2006 Page 2 of 7 Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under =- license from the American Land Title Association Order No.: 237841 Reference No.: atl-151337 For all entities ACOUIRING PROPERTY FOR CASH, furnish formation and operational documentation, together with a certificate of good standing from the State in which the entity was created (and in which the property is located, if available). Item Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 of Schedule B-Section 2 may be deleted from the final policy, conditioned upon receipt and review of an executed standard form of the Company's affidavit or affidavits. Furnish a current, signed and dated, survey of the subject property, certified to Fidelity National Title Insurance Company and conforming to all current Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for the 2011 ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey Standards to delete Item No. 3 of Schedule B - Section 2. END OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 ALTA Commitment - 2006 Page 3 of 7 Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA T" 77, licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association Order No.: 237841 Reference No.: atl-151337 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain exception to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. 1. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. 2. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. 4. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 7. Real estate taxes for 2015 due and payable in 2015 in the total amount of $47,838.00, are paid in full. Property Tax Identification No. 25.8900020. Note: There are no delinquent taxes of record. The above tax amount may include annual recurring fees charged by the municipality and/or county, which are automatically certified to the real estate taxes. 8. Levied and pending special assessments hereafter levied. 9. There are no levied or pending special assessments now of record. 10. Rights of tenants in possession under the terms of unrecorded leases. 11. Terms and conditions of restriction as contained in Warranty Deed, dated September 4, 1970, recorded September 11, 1970 as Document No. 09917. 12. Terms and conditions of Easement, dated September 19, 1975, recorded February 23, 1976 in Book 126 of Deeds, Page 3 as Document No. 28232. 13. (Intentionally Deleted). 14. Drainage and utility easements as shown on Plat of Zamor Addition, dated June 18, 1979, recorded October 4, 1979 as Document No. 44313. 15. Terms and conditions of Agreement, dated December 26, 1979, recorded December 28, 1979 as Document No. 45523. ALTA Commitment - 2006 Page 4 of 7 Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Fonn is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association Order No.: 237841 Reference No.: atl-151337 16. Terms and conditions of Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3, recorded March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. 17. Terms and conditions of Cross Easement for Parking, dated July 17, 1996, recorded July 29, 1996 as Document No. 198692. 18. Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement, and Assignment of Leases and Rents, dated October 3, 1996, executed by Michael A. Ramsey and Jill S. Ramsey, as Mortgagors, in favor of State Bank of Chanhassen, as Mortgagee, recorded October 7, 1996 as Document No. 201805, securing the original principal amount of $800,000.00. 19. Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing and Assignment of Leases and Rents, dated February 4, 2015, executed by Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, as Mortgagor, in favor of Bridgewater Bank, a Minnesota banking corporation, as Mortgagee, recorded February 5, 2015 as Document No. 605309, securing the original principal amount of $1,660,000.00. 20. The following matters shown on the ALTA/ACSM Survey prepared by Mark R. Salo through Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated February 3, 2016, last revised , as Project/Job No. a) Underground telephone crosses the Northern portion of the subject property without the apparent benefit of an easement 21. Terms and conditions of Conditional Use Permit, recorded October 5, 1983 in Book 69 Misc, Page 90 as Document No. 61557. (Parcel 3) 22. Terms and conditions of Conditional Use Permit, recorded August 23, 1984 in Book 79 Misc, Page 276 as Document No. 67033. (Parcel 3) 23. Terms and conditions of Conditional Use Permit, recorded August 23, 1984 in Book 79 Misc, Page 277 as Document No. 67034. (Parcel 3) 24. Terms and conditions of Contract for Private Redevelopment, dated September 11, 1990, recorded April 30, 1991 as Document No. 123421. (Parcel 3) 25. Terms and conditions of Final Certificate, dated October 1, 1993, recorded October 27, 1993 as Document No. 157032. (Parcel 3) 26. Real Estate Mortgage, dated January 28, 2009, executed by Chanhassen Inn, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, as Mortgagor, in favor of Beacon Bank, as Mortgagee, recorded February 27, 2009 as Document No. 496011, seucring the original principal amount of $250,000.00. (Parcel 3). END OF SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 ALTA Commitment - 2006 Page 5 of 7 Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under = license from the American Land Title Association Order No.: 237841 Reference No.: at1-151337 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 3 INFORMATION Any charges for municipal services (i.e., water, sewer, correction of nuisance conditions, etc.) are the responsibility of the parties to this transaction. For information regarding the existence of any such bills contact the appropriate municipal office. In the event a zoning endorsement is requested, we will require a zoning letter from the municipality or a zoning report specifying the current or proposed use, specifying the zoning classification, and stating whether the property is in compliance with all applicable zoning ordinances. Parking must be addressed in the letter or report if it is to be included in the zoning endorsement. ALTA Commitment - 2006 Page 6 of 7 Copyright American land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association Order No.: 237841 Reference No.: ati-151337 EXHIBIT A A Lease between the Lessee and the Landlord as evidenced by the following documents Lease, dated , 2015, by and between Chanhassen Shoppes, LLC, as Lessor, and Chick- fil-A, Inc., as Lessee, recorded 2015 as Document No. ; as to the following described property: Parcel 1: Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following two tracts: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating; and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208E on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. Parcel 2: Easement for parking as contained and described in Cross Easement for Parking dated July 25, 1996, filed July 29, 1998, as Document No. 198692. Parcel 3: Together with any benefits as set forth in Reciprocal Access Easement Agreement, dated , 2016, recorded , 2016 as Document No. Abstract Property ALTA Commitment - 2006 Page 7 of 7 Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under = license from the American Land Title Association LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL HRGreen 420 North Front Street, Suite 100 McHenry, IL 60050 815.385.1778 To: City of Chanhassen Community Development Department Attn: Mr. Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Specifications ® Prints/Plans ❑ Reports Date: March 23, 2016 Job No. 86150413 Re: Chick-fil-A Chanhassen, MN Store #03840 We are sending you the following items: ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ UPS Standard ® UPS Overnight ❑ Delivery ❑ Via ❑ Proposal ❑ Change Order Copies Date Description 7 Lot Line Adjustment Sketch (24"x36") 1 Lot Line Adjustment Sketch (8.5"x11") 1 CD (Containing TIFF & PDF files) ❑ For Approval ® For Review and Comment ® For Your Use ❑ As Requested ❑ For Signature ❑ Returning to You ❑ Other (See remarks) Remarks: Please find attached the attached Lot Line Adjustment sketch regarding the proposed Chick-fil-A project to be located at 445 West 79`" Street. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Thank You! Copies to: Signed: Joseph F. Vavrina, P.E. Project Manager Page 1 of 1 VJESt 99 �'� o.s. am°''0°� wwwussv y N T "co ' StAoh ONO I � I I = I y HR Gre m_I= L rmme nnour a. a.... n.. L F? r. fws.MMMq M RI FM1eY MO a sew •us1eu��s•IXa�v.n�l'•W ,t)A.°• Ou. [��Nx�si�r � riM1.t�l�M1sa�m•a❖ 0 Chick — � ma toe ILu Adhutmmt slnerh SCANNED ©2016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Existuig Parcel Dwcsiption PID Na 2M9=20 Right of Way of 79th Street West / k j per the plot of FRONTIER DEL£LOPMEN7 PARK / i Lot 2, Block 1, Zomor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, / ,ao I / fa Carver County, Minnesota; EXCEPTNG THEREFROM the following two tracts: / \ A// that port of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded E _ plat thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on on assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, / u \ along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor way Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the / .su° �p5" Access sated sa+oc• oGJ3 line of said Lot 2 and there terminating,129.14 feet to the Southerly actual polo o beginning o e line o edescribed; thence South \ 5 � degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for ere J ,aa Pa"pdY 6Hominoas Dfo� �OZ,6 \ I Z 54 and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. ♦ ♦ I: w e ♦ a All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, according to the V recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: Zp Y\ Oroinaga and Utility Easement per / \ 7 detax an the plat of ZAMOR ADDIVON Commencing at the most easterly corner of sold Lot 2, thence on an \ assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, \ \ Existing Building along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 11 Block 1 said ZAMOR \ \ ' ADDITION, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the \ \� actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 \ Building Canopy \ z. degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East or 129.14 feet to the southerly �p0 line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: \ 84,40 '�� \ • PID 258900010 That part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, shown as Parcel 208E on 1*63 Existing One Story Building \ Ut Owner HOLIDAY STAT/LW STORES INC Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed \ 445-463 West 79th Street \ / .� March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. 1 Building \ Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317 South line of Lot 1, Sign / \\ \ O Block 1, ZAMDR ADD/TION 1984 ' \\ \ - 1541 \� / I Proposed Parcel D�Ppdon \ I \\ most lock 1, corner of Lot 2. -� Block 1, ZANOR of LotO2. \ PID 258900020 N85°57'04aW 154 \ , Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Drainage and Utility Easement per --- c _ - _ \ Owner CHANHASSEN - - - - - - Carver County, Minnesota; detail on the plot of ZAMOR ADDITION - - -_� - '- - - --- - - - \ SHOPPES L L C \ Bituminous aarfoce \ $\ - - - - - - - / a♦?° 1 EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: \ �+ Drainage and Utility Easement per 7.00 detail on the plat of ZAMOR ADDITION o` Q� That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zomor Addition, shown as Parcel 208E on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 \ � LOT 2 eatedylinParCUNDOTel2058 , IO filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. Existing PID Division Line Drainage end Utility Easement per {p \ detail on the plot of ZAMOR ADD177ON � h e C # Sign Easement per �1 \ �,00 Doc. No. 35184 �1 c\ \ ro a /' \ i \ f I X ry�ry- --- a s Notes \ PID 258900021 y / Owner CITY OF CHANHASSEN �/ / I Q 1) The site is currently zoned BH-Highway and Business Services District per Site m it Investigation Report by HR Green, dated December 16, 2015. Building setbacks: / Front Lot Line = 25 feet PID 258900030 Owner CHANHASSEN INN \\ Side Lot Line 10 feet Rear Lot Line = 20 feet Bituminous surface \ Ii J` \ Building Canopy / p \\ II 2) Subject property contains 57,588 sq. ff. or 1.322 acres. I/ I lee^t \ I Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 45,309 sq. ft. or 1.053 acres i Ed'In°N \ \ a pip Apo I Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. or 0.259 acres ram\ �t of P �� v 3) Impervious surface calculation Concrete surface \ ` � " Pef \ \ - Sign / D 9i 1\0� II Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. \ N �'�/xGEP2o6 I� Building, Parking Lot and sidewalks impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. Impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. / 82.0 Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. Impervious area = 0.00 sq. ft. / 0.07 t OepN rl i'p,3 \ �Per � \ of We t o \ �p the pl Y1 i / / 1 \`\ \\� ass co^�iatia^ R19^t ` \�, Sidewalk `I pcfcira^sp^ i I i �°" - nAr dot Sign toe o DIPON I I V I/ �E\\ �♦ eaeteM°R Pp `\ /\^ OQ JsQ� t _ loatc^k 1 00 Ic UN� lRt dthrat oo1Y qnV arp�e g"t e 01 dedicated ce J20 40 60 Publicly v"assor g1tu i Datm 03/23/16 Sheft 1 OF 1 Westwood CMW. Prepared for. Chic+■key-f it -A Phone (952)937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive t `WU HR Greerev n, Inc #V3M Lot Line Adjustment Fax (952) 937-6822 Eden Prairie, MN 553C4 Damn Fm Tea Free (WS)937-5150 wastwoodps.com New bmox, Illinois Westwood Protamlonai Se,vkK Inc. Re0ed s bZL t HR omen Project Numb= WWW ` hanhasmi, Minnesota L STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LIMITED USE PERMIT FOR NONMOTORIZED RECREATIONAL TRAIL C.S.1002 County of Carver City of Chanhassen TH 5 Trail from CSAH 17 to Carver/Hennepin County Line In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 161.434 and 23 C.F.R. 652 also published as the Federal -Aid Policy Guide, a Limited Use Permit is hereby granted to the, City of Chanhassen, Permittee. This permit is for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and operating a nonmotorized recreational trail, (hereinafter called trail), within the right of way of Trunk Highway No. 5 as shown in red on Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This permit is executed by the Permittee pursuant to the attached resolution. In addition, the following special provisions shall apply: SPECIAL PROVISIONS The construction, maintenance, and supervision of the trail shall be at no expense to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2. Before construction of any kind, the plans for such construction shall be approved in writing by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, through the District Engineer. 3. No permanent structure(s) or advertising device(s) in any manner, form or size shall be constructed, placed or permitted to be constructed or placed upon the State of Minnesota right of way. 4. No commercial activity or activities shall be allowed to operate upon said State of Minnesota right of way. 5. Any and all maintenance of the trail shall be provided by the Permittee; this includes, but is not limited to, the plowing and removal of snow, and the installation and removal of regulatory signs. 6. This permit is non-exclusive and is granted subject to the rights of others, including, but not limited to public utilities which may occupy said right of way. Page 1 of 4 The Permittee shall preserve and protect all utilities located on the lands covered by this permit at no expense to the Minnesota Department of Transportation and it shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to call the Gopher State One Call System at 1-800-252-1166 at least 48 hours prior to performing any excavation. 8. Any crossings of the trail over the trunk highway shall be perpendicular to the centerline of the highway and shall provide and ensure reasonable and adequate stopping sight distance. 9. The Permittee shall construct the trail at the location shown in the attached Exhibit "A" subject to verification by the Minnesota Department of Transportation District Engineer that the construction geometrics and procedures result in a trail that is compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the highway facility. 10. Approval from Minnesota Department of Transportation District Engineer shall be required for any changes from the approved plan. 11. Upon completion of the construction of the trail, the Permittee shall restore all disturbed slopes and ditches in such manner that drainage, erosion control and aesthetics are perpetuated. 12. This permit does not release the Permittee from any liability or obligation imposed by federal law, Minnesota Statutes, local ordinances, or other agency regulations relating thereto and any necessary permits relating thereto shall be applied for and obtained by the Permittee. 13. Any use permitted by this permit shall remain subordinate to the right of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to use the property for highway and transportation purposes. This permit does not grant any interest whatsoever in land, nor does it establish a permanent park, recreation area or wildlife or waterfowl refuge facility that would become subject to Section 4 (f) of the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1968, nor does this permit establish a Bikeway or Pedestrian way which would require replacement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 160.264. 14. This permit shall be subject to cancellation and termination by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, with or without cause, by giving the Permittee 90 days written notice of such intent. Upon said notice of cancellation the trail shall be removed within 90 days by the Permittee. Upon cancellation of said permit, or any portion thereof, the Permittee will be required to return and restore the area to a condition satisfactory to the Minnesota Department of Transportation District Engineer. The removal of the trail and the return and restoration of the area shall be at no cost to the Minnesota Department of Transportation and at the sole expense of the Permittee. Page 2 of 4 15. The Permittee, for itself, its successors, and assigns, agrees to abide by the provisions of Title VI Appendix C of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which provides in part that no person in the United States, shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from, or denied use of any trail. 16. The State of Minnesota, through its Commissioner of Transportation, shall retain the right to limit and/or restrict the parking of vehicles and assemblage of trail users on the highway right of way over which this permit is granted, so as to maintain the safety of both the motoring public and trail users. 17. No assignment of this permit is allowed. 18. The Permittee shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any container on the State's right of way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, the Permittee shall provide for cleanup of the spilled material and of materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of the Permittee. 19. The Permittee shall hold harmless and indemnify the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees and its successors and assigns, from liability claims for damages because of bodily injury, death, property damage, sickness, disease, or loss and expense arising from the operations of the trail or from the use of the portion of highway right of way over which this permit is granted. 20. The Permittee shall hold harmless and indemnify the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees and its successors and assigns from claims arising or resulting from the temporary or permanent termination of trail user rights on any portion of highway right of way over which this permit is granted. 21. The Permittee will hold harmless and indemnify the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees from claims resulting from temporary or permanent changes in drainage patterns resulting in flood damages. 22. The Permittee (for itself, its contractors, subcontractors, its materialmen, and all other persons acting for, through or under it or any of them), covenants that no laborers', mechanics', or materialmens' liens or other liens or claims of any kind whatsoever shall be filed or maintained by it or by any subcontractor, materialmen or other person or persons acting for, through or under it or any of them against the work and/or against said lands, for or on account of any work done or materials furnished by it or any of them under any agreement or any amendment or supplement thereto; agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the State of Minnesota from all such liens and claims. Page 3 of 4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: istrict1Enngingin6er c� Date ! ' f/0 APPROVED BY: COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION B` y: �� Direc or, Office of Land Management Date The Commissioner of Transportation by the execution of this permit certifies that this permit is necessary in the public interest and that the use intended is for public purposes. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By `-- it Its //P1 And Its Date Page 4 of 4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: — April 12, 2004 RESOLUTION NO: 2004.19 MOTION BY: Peterson SECONDED BY: Lundquist A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LIMITED USE PERMIT FOR NON -MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL TRAIL FROM CSAH 17 TO CARVERMENNEPIN COUNTY LINE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the Limited Use Permit for Non -Motorized Recreation Trail, per attached document. This permit is for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and operating a non -motorized recreation trail from CSAH 17 to Carver Hennepin County line as shown on Exhibit A. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this I day of April 2004. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager ffm Furlong Ayotte Labatt Lundquist Peterson Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor NO None None MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TF CONCRETE AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR E1. RORO&Qt-�ig LOCATED ON_,LN,J_ FAOM 20001 Mj-OF_GN.V_._' T0_EBS1CjAB.VEB.0011NTY uNE.JN CHANHASSEN STATE PROI. NO. 1002"DI (TX SI STATE PRO)- NIL MINN. PRO). NO. MINN. PROI. NO. GROSS OROSS IENGTH REi MITES ERIDGES-IENGTH___i13J7 RPT_O.MO_MItES BRIDGES-UNGTN ITET MILES EXCEPTIONS -LENGTH 0,00 NETS —MITES EXCEPTIONS-IENGM RET MILES NET t1NGM M,19 PoT I ML—MIUS ' NET LENGTH '"RET MXES REF. POINT_Mt!PQ 3_T(T REF POIM 1R.3PQA09 - .MITE POINT TO MITE POINT_ NOTES Pftd C LENGTH BASED ON PROPOSED EN REFERENCE LINE ALIGNMENT. - W. PONT 48 E STA. 991.87 REF. PONT48 6 STA. 1041175 - 9T9.09.89 • S79-02.19 @'LL) =18.36. 999.26.34 . _p33 C4.92• M5147.06.. ME9T9CUNO 97T•880Y • 9T746E44 . 998139.21 • 994. 28.34 1032•SAW • x)36.47.06 Nm v. ..I.I[[u NlmYnn 11-u :inlwlm LUNIO. aWnmvxnnl. WxarlM.na . it1 rts ulrmea pwwer, �. .1n411nMlIM Wltl� VV [IUlI11N[II1. MiY1M M' nUNIT..'IM uv . iiu"Lle. `Ims",uiiae Mw n 41u11 nMlrNI 1111.111, wrtll"I _ 11 ii ev�ll .Yl u104M1i uaimal' Af�I14el WI" M. ITIIILI I UNIT[ IxfU[I lEKK4VNl ' �'{f.11 -. IPalln tNt' 11 ;ICIUUXI.lal"W911alflna n"IA Miie.life "m enuu low ia: III 11NW1114 U. n6Vll mrno tMMI .1.1"ron¢x " .1.1 TMUNMI •. li, NO Tell OF NeU ma.1.1 ur.Me OMon(llal W N MITI. wCU. es, 1.1 t 1 DAIF(.=*,REC. MINIM (MR. DESIGN S"D RIn9n�A�±Ma=Ar_¢!w ur '` M)ht M All, Age.MaM e,,,Ll `=A.:`�19 RMmm1IAMNY, U.11r6. sx •n�L AnanmeMM Mr Awlmt �—Y 19_ RMemm.naM Nr APortv�lreNa.•1�.}ye.l94Y.._ RMem_1I�e tlMMARprnxl�l�.' a fJ.}p�—YJlFYt9�L- s feA araax, a - � enla RMemnndM Mr ApprwH,//,,(!�[.�-,_ INDEX MIMISud ' _ AMruRd ��O'/ftawiau'f'uN vrt°�slmw.lw1 S.A:P. 10-617-13 COUNTY S7- ID PPP V S M ��/. I 11AYMM 1raMx u rvwMIM6Iw 1TICirI OeR r[en11 Al YMI1FaY aYYIMfiYMMF . n MaxwmMMTn uuaYi em '�11'�-,,'.'� Arnern - SCAIE ewwuru n. urnvYt INOFI4MAP_��M ."M N wr3-9Y DESIGN DESIONATION -TIER NO.1— Ina IxwNu t :uf: l-Heels w� r1AY rtruleYe ACT(C.Ile., r)986— p.300 Doel[6 Speed 60_MPX - �., Pan tixe Avpvmmed Srxeou ME r2wxlut P. xxrTawx x A. awn em Ilan na Ames... n 2010 — j$.m Bend ex.5. lJryti31[hl CUT..ae -STATE PROD NO. CHARGE IDENTIFIER ACTT UNIT Y M) DRY (DMI[n Nr V.0 � 4100 MMRAI el eY4�5_ K. YE ablest-U—' PROAQ LO ATION 100E-3 1 a(Dlreellanal Diet,.) e 0 % Dnl[n Speed not eehlered etI CARVER COUNTY T(MenY CAmmerel.0 v -45_% IM, To SN. nx_- METRO .DISTRICT S,AP 10 617-13 SICTe "A. Nrx_ STATE PRW. No.J49T..-31(LJ S • I21 S SHEET NO._I OF_2W_9NEET5 ux nmr 4l r AI w n n aPeewve ewean uPRe uIri eel« a%uu, e[wAwwlfw�awRal ,n iiauli a,mew ue P M�1W1 llW ll i� YR.W�n aILNP ' Mgw,l AAA AllOhAAl µF�l AN al 1 All11 ie iy r-,M RANe AllWAAAMr -Ial 10. RPM PAP M f11 M RNNLAA .11 11Te A:... LL liplp i ei W 41u SAaw PONT �[WEOAMORLAIE xA RAmra wxrcartRLr VrIER CUTE nNENRa6�FM MgVf MMMEIO P.T. II.41.� A.lS,... 1 APISO r�ANNT, .. AT S.E Ci .1. UNE. 1 (,� PC II•EB.O! DWAY II COMROL MW LxATIGNS li ®. PFDESiMM' cimR R VNINnO0f IT' .: R II WIIOSMELMATEDATCENIFR . We1FAE9NCNN DO MISEYI94 +\I\1 ORD r ® 2R Pif W4 ;I.2E• r / . �CR. fT fB PRClIIE LINC pR0O ® CR q Pq[fILE EE Ma EE0}5111• C® CR. D NO MVILE LINE VMW > LINE EOUATION9. ®WB P,OL 98.1}9E 82. N - CA. 17 SO PROFILE LINE V*WD4 1E ® WR P.00. 9BS�44.>3• Ia - CN.I] NB PRPFILE LINE tl�b.O4 µ . 30FE M%`EVAYa l %fAYA DFq '.. ._f.GNryNEECCIYaV'IO EX6 MRDADIAT I0 •. /.;•. 'DOERS,.. .�� }App • BE MAbERY01AkT4---..—yB----J 2Yq.. . S B Tillrtup ArMEID LLL RNSED 4S��g 49 Tp WS S� RT DDE/FT. TVA'ARD TIIh0WAN6�SHEETf END END TAPER OW. TRAR PETItlY 2 Rp .. • .. ---L _ .. NATCH TRAIL E%ISTIIp 9T 9'Clw.-_ 12lyyC WR REFERENCE LINE TRAIL TE R. q1�.TZ,� -� APFR20 . 0NI1I IOnsi [R 9Tl•BJ @DI .• lkMr . TWPI LAVE .ry® p W TUIIN LANE I :\tl P .•'. i J I 1 FRl' } I`......._ p� t'. E � Z 81 TAPER,^, 3 E �`��1/;y�p�?<41.iJ L 7rs'7.J. t '11 fXTi �i. � fjy. :,71 4�\v Yr ]✓ t r _`a�� 6 �`'�"�� '' �"' �.�,,e[ IermcxcE �1 'M•R � NMq 1 All/APn 'y.{ Ii yy t ]q i yyyyy� Y i A4 Y 11. T i Nnn i Ar TT i APR 1 A}D i// MNNJ i ni i JTi e.RAT b I •. ... , c R•s]'t{k/� A. �'` > iAan R sAn N1 irtnA y{,1yy. DppN ff: dlll fCYt t;R� gICCWD G`�OA' t'. N Y' ARE MAyr' ! �NNOT[ MINE ARE TO -ACE Ci CURB... pvp_ ,I.^rCE D� REWTISTRUCTION / YeT.R rr LqN I., AS 60 .x6fYuTnI�Pll�oiriroe!•u •� � .' . fit 9]f�p Prof. No. 1002-DI (LH S) - . r �r F� Is Enr nuns e,w./W s xBR u MWNr 11„»e.l. ,;;;p,x YwHf3nxr-.r,wH. .µ,.�, n AM. i iiX ma u r w� i»en:n men r.>wnae"p1r,.°H],wx,i�° x„M•M,x uXµ°fRrlmr�w^,mxz xx m.w•Nr n vim �. C Y 011prwr X f ,mrn ww.xr u x e u ° Iwiiw� w w u vy AA , X •am xE Mw„xT Ym if "•Y]X[ WrM.wr p I�xfX ,e li N a fu4n m p 1 ilii en MW, Y°Nr -, I"I� •eui M IRS NMrx� NBC ] ].w lr f FYa. W voixr - 1 nwuz [wM xmw Oi_w f4 f i4m ,r I �l�lllu[u41 ] mr[�r ,. v]<uiBl wn` i0o °aH.ii i w iniui:i NHlrici lwc]�uN[HmaH r rMC V%Lmwwlmxana^m u[Wx ru°ca•x I°rFi e n Iv,� ,iw r yl; 1 wwi Gfw ism' ".wuirrra w N�i°I°�e.w � pu[ a wYeel°tizi ,idu � Me[� M e N I rwHe�a i'n'e`.°,: Iw f',KUf ruf° Iw IRA xm+: n.a rc [°Nei i•,r rlm• fVATC aBn'o auR s. j—a5'R. aEG.0 1- 11'90 ENBTpigRr Op,0f0 �T,A I4-M ENp BEGIN R.U. ps TAPER I I MIB CURB ANO GUTTER eG f me �qe IEXIS}WO CB4 r AREA fFf91p1TAL9UBCRADS SOL rY Iff 11•roMA'VT6iWM4S fOq CF vWPCMPRI'E11P.ET.OER Cff 45ro 7 TAPER 'l �xtOd� NSN- ,L>Fl Al mID o R /§, �WTJIA ♦I - �ISr06 RfGW TAPEfl g 1 NAN GRFATMIN9 BOW, j u TAPE��' / �• A a / IY, ENO fl 12•'10EN0 /// ':, o WIS CUP TAPERH d BFOM r'A MDGU 11.90RE01 N. TAPER PER,EN�cc iI Evn b n '- - - - 6'COND soEWPLX MPJB MNi flACVMMn4Nf IGOGTOMFTKMBq x�ryA 4gG 2A � r. COG TO GN MYI MOM IOHf SM0.l 10XT StlR P 0f`-A. �• f Y_ SOMR,ER M'R. N R® O M12MWEB 04 SO PROFILE EFILLINENE NOt4 NAC. M9fOR RAd19 FdM AN[RI r ® M•b0I1EASO RESNLI B_VD• f6NM.ALLNHM axfflq lams LfP pa. IOlI•JT.O(EB REE LINE - 9xTYHArFWECFLRINN4LPHE. I PG ® W, 0- \ `I� ® ILSs NB PRJFlLE LV&• CONTROL PgMr LOCATIONS z• 4 4 W31• WIB ES REF. LINE 6- 5,78® R j ® -1'MA 99 PROFILEF.LINE E• EµGE L\NE � NT WI.02.b WB REF. LINE 0- 3.88 GREAT PLAINS BLVO • BA�CBGr V1R WOEµ GggO ® QfW". N IOSP e.9T WB REF. LINE 0 0 SA NO PROFILE LINE q,fOBgg0 O80 T�,N O % x 'r' $'a• ® 1051`A3.1]WB REF. LINE CCNC SIpEWgLN BEGIN q. gTE \2 0A2AOa �® N 1RAN31RDN ® KoEsTRIANCURB RAMPI MnCOTM 4pIR /- OB4T08pM PPRBO`B61R f X PLATE TOGS M BE LGCATflJ AT CENTER p O OF RAISED ISLANDS WHERE SHOWL W/R GREAT P1�AMS BIND N AS,YfY` BIN CBG G ENO WNFILE LINE ® MSRN E%�5'TING gMBAN0611fTER tNO S DPIVEWAY APHM AL 6 WESL SICE OF ,P '® B•ASEND bN¢D STATION. Wyk}[ T: RM�MEPIN `2 T N Op RIPEROR,X1CH EXBnNO ® UflIVEWpV�VEMEXroTNSECTIIXI. NJ Ifl YAL �T B61B[RG 301 TAPER IU 12 NTT' BPffV" ® x TBSETA RYX------SITIONWITHK ® RAI9f019LAN09RH TO BE R AROUND DPEOL AT O ENp W'R. i - 'N ENO !/ MRTCHINp <f'Ep' fP.1. irSp GREAT MAINS 0.08 FT./fT. TGWARD THE 15VND. 1 p ERD/ . 14V0. 100' RI'. NorE: DINENSIaxs sHOWN ARE TO RCE U W'sE•OO BIB gYOrIrofMBIPAZ.Mf i OF CUM y,28 �BETTOPER yy F Yjp'NT%WE / GREAT IXL _l •20 ENO SO PROFFlILE LMIFO ]•EOGREAT RgWg BLyD, 1•SgJ01ELLpN TRIPE- 0SSIMR A X` tl Im` MbBEI GINMI TAPER O LMyA,TCHpfry�%ISTVrNTC1ppRNEWf NO fe•ti REFERETCE LINE aT aBYRL OF MA CHLIN E SHE T Cep NED sr..,stE mwrrr+vw OBeMto>•Aachman AasoDleNe, Inc. TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 RECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION PLAN erm pWMI RM SxONN xn, M'•NI H•^rr`x .... •.. N'9rAIWI•MM9Tp 104xrg9 IVml9] s23G State Pro] No. 1002-51 IT.H. 5) 11 e '� �:..,_�...d....._ � Cam& c� e:m-.IEs USA IS NI FWT ¢uEaramnB Lwe �WI RMNBIOIXTO(fPiRNIf MEN DIRRBOITER MID NKNSM6 PER PPNUI R"Or YK A' FKE C£ CUR 41 OTHFRRM12l RXM9. .. AT FDCE OF pXNNO I WNTROL PINT LWATKN9 I6 A TFM DANO P Ra� .. • W9 RFPEROA'.E IIE � \2 V�i •. \nr 2 pHE 24CBS 9TNMINW9 C Qj gQ•M2lD RE N NO CONCRETE REWININO WALL /� NNW 9rENO M24 COG '/ Y NNPP 9r 0 PEwe coo R ' / EmmBmle��tCvvvBn.. / 1049•30 IN TAPER � /-` IOAB•EO TMN LANE TAPER. / NNB•40 SON T.CURR Q 047140 END DIED CBO. I�S BEGIN Box CBS. - LAKE -__„____DRIVE TMLa P\� I Mx C00 A ' W 'Sd a s coo W Ae 01 W CB REFERENCE Z YA US TEST OSarton-Aachman Aasociatea, Inc. W. 981h ST. -e 4SW 0 w TPppA01 y i ILI N1 ® PAM STRIFE Z SABA C 60 i J kOR. I !- U ® L® N7>0•BLlB WB THA• M. Q 6098 DANOTA AYE © (SETA IOC11tB TYFE TrANsmCN b R3N8 DA M2. (BOTH 910[B © p3y BDy EB T.H.S. _ „YOB BB DAKI ARE. ' 8611 - Q 1066.2Il33 EH TH !- ID• W NO DINOTA PYE 8•2050It P.T. 1074 91 DRII(EIZAY • 7•BD.21 © PIT, IOSAI 9.32.00 .CK81 p 01 B•9l NB END TAPER NB REF. B PROFILE LINE O 8.47 NO BEGIN TAPER a CONSISTS SIDCMYN n S Q9 BITUMINCUS CURB }p R[MNN INPLPCE IMTII PEtiMANENT - T33 §B• CANOTA PVE NORiH6TX! (DRNEVNr Is carvSTRVCTE0. ® OTTLAAIIEN 0 PI 6.SI DUES 1CURB (SE£ PC. IPWIITHHT © MEDIA eT�,, p LRBNTED A. e•T, EMIR SPACINBI 1810 CBD`�` ® 8618 CBS NRJM19 RAISED CONCRETE MEDIAN, 6•S!N uln f DAHOTP A ® 0624 CVRB B fARlfli PADA'A ALL RAISER I6LAN09 14 TO BE ALAM AT D06 FT.6i. 6•00 EMIR NB RON TONARO THE ISLPNO. B MCFlLE I ' NOTES DIMENSA N9 SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF' CURB. . AREN OF PoTflfTHU-SU&i1ADE SOIL CP JI�9YfiKTFORR SCLFAMIP PDAW FDJIEA TRUNK HIGHWAY S RECONSTRUCTION Stab Pro] No. IOOE•BI f aEO . 9WE y amen Eo AS '""""� "'^ �+ BaµtOn•AnChmyo Aow_ clatwa, Inc. TitUNK HIGHWAY 5 FECONSTRIIGTION ONSTNUCTION PLAN. IYUWN RM SIaMa ....11, - se cn lGN`im nR.101�-de' II/Y41'1 r• 5) L,"a { <i )r_etu_m B*—d _w LV bing �heatr=. Alatkrt it Arboretum S ik - {hanhassm �«_ Ar---r)o_re-tut 02016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Existing Parcel Descripa'on PID Na 2M9=20 Right o/ Way of 79th Street West per the plat of FRONTIER DE4£LOPMENT PARK / f Lot Z Block 1, Zomor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following two tracts: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line. - Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on on assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zomor / �/1� 0"t of a°y Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the V�J d,;y Access actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 w \\ r�a \ Drm ay 'I •� -' °a\arded�m°�e`ef°°' s1 65 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly P BitU '" D R� Z _`F i p line of said Lot 2 and there terminating; IN and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208E on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. :r - I1:r •�• I • :'Ill I\ i All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: 20 �\ % detail gon the plattof ZA'Moa ADDD177ON Commencing at the most easterly corner of sold Lot 2; thence on an \ \ assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, Existing Buildingalong the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1 said ZAMOR \ \ ADDITION, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the \ \A actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 \ Building Canopy - \ z degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East or 129.14 feet to the southerly \ \ _ 7.p0 line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: port art of Lot 2, Block 1 ZAMOR ADDITION, shown as Parcel 208E on 1If 63 Existing One Story Building \ owner HOLIDAY STA77ON STORES INC Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed \ 445-463 West 79th Street \ w� / .� March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. Existing Building \ Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317 \ South line of ITI ; Sign / '� \Block I, ZAMDR ADDITION ed, 19•B4 \\ \ 15.41 Proposed Parcel De ption \ \ \\ most Block �i1. ZAMOR ADD17701V \\ PID 258900020 2°.45\� —\ N85°52'p•{•gr 154 4B\ / I Lot 2, Block 1, Zomor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Drainage and Utility Easement per - _ _ \ �\ �"� g Y p _ _ \ Owner CHANHASSEN — — — — — _ _ detail on the plat of ZAMOR ADDIT70N - -_-- — — — — — \ F&a ' 1 , Carver County, Minnesota; SHOPPES LLC —+ ---- W EXCEPTNG THEREFROM the following tract: \ Bituminous surface p, `I g I �+ Drainage and Utility Easement per o �0` \ 7.00 detod on the plat of ZAMOR ADDIBON o Q �3°� I That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on \\ � LOT 2 / 4R O Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Woy Plat No. 10-3 �al'Ny I Po cel z08B -� r� S filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. ? \ b \_ ___- Existing PID Division Line Drainage and Uttllty Easement per ON \ z detail on the plot of ZAMOR ADDITION c hC 1 01 Sign Easement per\\Doc. No. J5784 \Ir\ �\\ r400 / fr , ° ° ° Notes e N PID 258900021 \ \° Owner CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1) The site is currently zoned BH—Highway and Business Services District per Site Investigation Report by HR Green, dated December 16, 2015. Building setbacks. - Front Lot Line = 25 feet PID 258900030/ I I Side Lot Line = 10 feet Owner CHANHASSEN INN ONHA\ \ \ Rear Lot Line = 20 feet 2) Subject property contains 57,588 sq. ft. or 1.322 acres. Bituminous surface V _- Building Canopy e°' Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. or 7.063 acres Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. or 0.259 acres Imo\ i sailTPO rR \ R \ \ vraf I v 3) Impervious surface calculation \\ ✓� CK 1 \ \ Concrete surface \ ` �I Per � f \\ / , D TON Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. 91 cE? 2 068 II Building, Parking Lot and sidewalks impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. 00�6 �3'S1re( Impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. / 82.0 % Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. Impervious area = 0.00 sq. ft. / 0.0% rile Mi'n°/1P1aN0. 1 \ - �r te�a \ i / .7� \\ \\ co"trotlrRl9ht o \ p �� g6• e a \/ , f 5`deWolY -- nf`TS°nsPoh � D �6 of LO� , � �'r Sign ,p`\\�\\\\J /• tedY 1� \ \\�68G Sri, i No 5 i9h toirof �� VOrlabie dedicatee rig rfoos 0' 20' 40' 60' PublidYBituotlaus li \ 1 /i\ OJ \ntso It=\ 1 v Date: 03/23/16 Sheet 1 OF 1 Westwood QVW. for Chick4it-A Phone (952) 937-6150 7699 Anagram Drive `WM HR Green, Inc FSU #03W Lot Line Adjustment F" (952) 937-6822 Eden Prairie, MN SSW DLL NMI Ta/Fne (888)937-5150 waftwoodPLom New Len=, nfinol9 Sketch Weriwood ProfeukxW Swvkaf, Inc �aOdd > 6 �� HR omm Frojed N=bw a6WW Q1anhasmi, hfinnesota 02016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 1I / / / / mm n+ rig \ L� • f r _� put, Y 6 °min°° \ D'�,' o0102 i 1 \ \ Right of Way of 79th Street West \\ per the plat of FRONTIER DEWLOPMENT PARK \ t r m I 0o I fo i i '\ I \ 1 \ I \ I I Drainage and Utility Easement per deta,7 on the plat of ZAMOR ADD17ION Existing Building IMsting Parcel Description PID Na 2M900020 Lot 2, Block 1, Zomor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, EXCEPTNG THEREFROM the following two tracts. All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zomor Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described, • thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating; and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zomor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. IIII,I III Will 111111 r: r 02 w • All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 2,• thence on on assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1 said ZAMOR ADDITION, for 154.54 feet to on angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East or 129.14 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: \ __ '. '\ PID 258900010 That part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, shown as Parcel 208E on t�% 63 - Existing One Story Building co Owner HOLIDAY STATION STORES INC Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed \ (A 445-463 West 79fh Street \ t� .I March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. Existing Building \ Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317 / \ South line of Lot 1, sign / \ Black I, ZAMOR ADD/71QN \ i \ 41 most easterly carrier of Lot 2, - / I �Opowd Parcel ✓�iO�.t i'piion \ \ \ Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION \\ PID 258900020 - 10°�\�— N8J°52s04'W 154.48` \ / I Lot 2, Block f, Zomor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Drainage and Utility Easement per --- c \ Owner CHA NHA SSEN — — — — _ 1 \ �� ? Carver County, Minnesota; detail an the plot of ZAMOR ADDITION - --_� — I -- — — — — — — \ RD UJ SHOPPES LLC $ \ Bituminous surface -7 EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: �a Drainage and Utility Easement per \ �00 detail on the plat of ZAMOR ADDITION `'Q �-� That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zomor Addition, shown as Parcel 208E on T Minnesota Deportment of Transportation Right of Wcy Plat No. 10-3 \\� LO! 2 Westerly Ln�oorc� 2DOD8g riled March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. \ -- " A & I W ? \ \ Existing PID Division Line Drainage and Utiilty Easement per / G \ detail on the plat of ZAMOR ADDIRON yOt ob I I N \ 4 Sign Easement per -rn/��roW �p Doc. No. 35184 184 \I!\` Notes PID 258900029 Owner CITY OF CHANHASSEN / g a Q 1) The site is currently zoned BH—Highway and Business Services District per Site Investigation Report by HR Green, dated December 16, 2015. \ / I Building setbacks. \ / ' Front Lot Line = 25 feet owe 8900CHANASSENINN \ / Side Lot Line = 10 feet \ \ \ JI I Rear Lot Line = 20 feet \ / \ _- Building Canopy 2) Subject property contains 57,588 sq. ft. or 1.322 acres. Bituminous surface \ elk Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. or 1.063 acres \\ i¶°O CIC Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. or 0.259 acres a%A (� \ R //��'/ 1 ilia Pt °t z V 3) Impervious surface calculation \ BL % -r / \ Concrete surface \ ` i� ?°( \ v„ y / 9� �,0� ' Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. \\ N Sign / i+M x�Ep 20gg �I Building, Parking Lot and sidewalks impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. Impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. / 82.0 \ , 83e2 sde"aI Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. Impervious area = 0.00 sq. ft. / 0.09' North fine of MNDOT -� 3\\ Parcel 20B9 EXCEPTION RsZ'� �I \\ MNDOT Parcel 2088 X �' D 01 00 \ / / e surf0as Deport io 3 Cancrat It atplot the Na. i i \ / i 96.iA `\\ \ contt t il p19nt -55 or / S� at �6 apt 2. .@ \ / i Sign J D Tom. \ine°0olos �� I V I / r�Soutne,ettP M H / U " w,dth rig °t Way I / I I ' I �� vOrlople toted ri9ft V ^ I 'I` . I \/ dell 10, 0 I ` I v V 0' 20' 40' 60' Puy11dY nous < ; Daft 03/23/16 sty 1 OF 1 0008216SKF01.dw for. Chick-f it -A Westwood Lot Line Adjustment Phil (952) 937.5150 7699 Anagram Drive �- � KHR Green, Inc FSU ' Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 553A4 vn..m arw Sketch TN Free (888)937-5150 westwoot41amm New LE!►OX, IIO>18 Rao Westwood Profeslonal Ser ekes, IRecited6 �/da* HQ Geem Ptojed Numbs II18882Iy M)IIIII B 02016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. i i i i i / / TR / mw r� m �g Wa 1 G 11 fight ea+° ria'e �,o5e 4° 2.65 \ -�- Right of Way of 791h Street Nest per the plat of FRONTIER DE1£LOPMENT PARK I i i i i Drainage and Utility Easement per data# an the plot of ZAMOR ADDITION Existing Building Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plot thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; EXCEP7NG THEREFROM the following two tracts: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded plot thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described,• thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating, and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. Irl III IN 1111111 !# - �94 @yJ• r r 1 • :'l// All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on on assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1 said ZAMOR ADDITION, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East or 129.14 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: \ ' a 1 '\ PID 258900010 That part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, shown as Parcel 208E on t�63 Existing One Story Bui/ding \ Owner HOLIDAY STA TIpJ STORES INC Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed \ 445-46J west 79th Street \ March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. Existing Bu#dh79 \ Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317 / \ 17Zh line o/ Lot 1, - Sign / \ \ �/ \ O Block 1, ZAMOR ADDIRON 7984 \\ \\ 15.41 \\ Proposed Parcel D�'ptian \ \ most We comer of Lof 2. -� \ t Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION \ PID 258900020 nfi\� — N85052'04eW 154.48` / ' Lot 2, Block 1, Zomor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Drainage and Utility Easement per - c \ Owner CHANHASSEN — — — -- — — — — _ �� , detail on the plot of ZAMOR ADDITION - --„\ — -�- — — — — — — — — \ F^o I I Carver County, Minnesota; SHOPPES LLC _ EXCEPTING THEREFROM the followingtract: \ Bituminous surface �+ Drainage and Utility Easement per % o �o \ 1.00 detail on the plot of ZAAIOR ADDIT70N v' Q That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208E on ` /� / 4c \ o I Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 \ � LOT 2 \ l Parcel2068 "S O filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. Westerly line of MNDOT -�� Existing PID Division Line Drainage and Utility Easement per -ee_" -/ V\ i detail on the plot of ZAMOR ADDITION N \ \ o Sign Easement per N )) q Notes j, Doc. No. 35784 lroLes a� \ m PID 258900021 \ Owner CITY OF CHANHASSEN / \ g I 1) The site is currently zoned BH—Highway and Business Services District per Site \ i/ i Y a II 1 investigation Report by HR Green, dated December 16, 2015. Building setbacks: \ / i It Front Lot Line = 25 feet PID 258900030 / I Side Lot Line = 10 feet Owner CHANHASSEN INN \ \\ / / / Y y I � Rear Lot Line = 20 feet Bituminous surface Building Canopy \ f D \\ II 2) Subject property contains 57,588 sq. ft. or 1.322 acres. \ V "�- Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. or 1.063 acres I/ \\ � \ /an Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. or 0.259 acres 'N /fie oil R //��/�/�(� 1 / pronP+at m V 3) Impervious surface calculation \\ BL / -/ ` / \ \ Concrete surface \ / / PB \ v \ sign / D 91, ��ON' I Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. Building, Parking Lot and sidewalks impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. Impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. / 82.0 % \ 83.62 Sidewalk Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. North line of MNDOT Impervious area = 0.00 sq. ft. / 0.09 \ g - / / D o 13 \ Parcel 208B \ �\ \ EXCEPTION �^ / / / / / RtZo,�y'� \ MNDOT Parcel 208B �1 SJrfa`e n3 oruns Gonarete P\p nesato No \/ \ the 1111 Way er \ / / / D �E 96, SiaeNolx pofcesen°pr{0tlO —A6 ` / 1 D t� °ip+n� \1 I Sign lino ✓/ ` / �� U V ` / '0 '`,\ •\ S0i n�st�PM� \\ /\ I \ ' I I `/ • ci` 3.62 Noe n L at w0Y tright Way voobN � n T I o 0' 20' 40' 60' 0tea do `surface 9011cy130minou, /\ I \ tare: 03/23/16 sty 1 of 1 0008216SKFOt.dw w � for. Chick-f it -A Westwood Lot Line Adjustment Plane (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive � `Win HR Green, Inc Fsv ° Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 56W � arw Sketch Tal Foe (888)937-5150 wastwoodps.mm New Lenox, Mmols we wmw Plataslo" %r*ft we- Ro=d °ei tan by/dda HR Qum waled N®ua BMW Chanhassen, Minnesota L 02016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. i / / / / / 1\ wTR / � m TN 11 co{ed ri9ni a°e \\ G dad e°'� 053 � A I f �� pubOdY tJd,;nptl= 1 4 e 6,011 7a2 Drainage and Utility Easement per detail on the plot of ZAAIOR ADDIRON PID 258900030 Omer CHANHASSEN INN Bituminous surface Westwood Plwne (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Few (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Fnes (888)937-5150 WashvoodPs.conl Westwood Professional Services, Inc / ->- Right of Way of 79th Street West f per the plot of FRON71£R DEVELOPMENT PARK r I i 1 1 I I 1 1 � � Drainage and Utility Easement per detar7 on the plat of ZAMOR ADDIRON Existing Bufld/ng PID 258900010 Owner HOLIDAY STA 7701V STORES INC I� �0 AIr\ dtnrig nt at variable eioted rigntd'dic °f qoY publidY ous gitUmia I I v craw: c2m dr.a cwbt Ueawm 5rw Record fhawina bENM Prepared for. f O HR Green, Inc New Lenox, Illinois HR GNM PsoJed Number 86115W79 I Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; EXCEPTNG THEREFROM the following two tracts: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described, thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating, and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Woy Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1 said ZAMOR ADDITION, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East or 129.14 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. •i_: • I w:ad • • Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; EXCEP7NG THEREFROM the following tract: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zomor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. Notes 1) The site is currently zoned BH—Highway and Business Services District per Site Investigation Report by HR Green, dated December 16, 2015. Building setbacks: Front Lot Line = 25 feet Side Lot Line = 10 feet Rear Lot Line = 20 feet 2) Subject property contains 57,588 sq. ft. or 1.322 acres. Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. or 1.063 acres Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. or 0.259 acres 3) Impervious surface calculation Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. Building, Parking Lot and sidewalks impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. Impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. / 82.0 Z Existing Parcel PID No. 256900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. Impervious area = 0.00 sq. ft. / 0.07. Chick-fil-A V 60' 20' 40' Date 03/23/16 Sheft 1 OF 1 Lot Line Adjustment Sketch 02016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. __ 1�., `1 X I IExisting Parcel Description PID Na 2M9=20 / 1 >- Right of Way of 79th Street West / 11 j per the plat of FRONTIER DEVELOPMENT PARK / i Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plot thereof, / o� I Carver County, Minnesota; / EXCEP7NG THEREFROM the following two tracts: A 1 \\ \ I All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded R AA I _ plot thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line: / m i Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2, thence on an 1t assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, / u \ 1 \ along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zamor r' �g a` way A Addition, for 154.54 feet to on angle point in said boundary and the 9nt \ r Access actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 E5 dadaarto \\ pted r� 1 Driwwai s u+ a�14°I Z degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly vyb `Iy g;tom au 16 ��OZ•�g5 } I o line of said Lot 2 and there terminating; and That part of Lot 2 Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208E on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 70-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. r:r - ,l�,:w .rr I • :'Ill All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDIT10N, according to the V recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the �. \ following described line: m \ �\ ,p 2\ Drainage and Utility Easement per \ detail w the plat of ZAMOR ADD177ON Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 2,- thence on an \ ;% assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, \ / \ i % Existing Budding along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1 said ZAMOR \ G A ' ADDITION, for 154.54 feet to on angle point in said boundary and the \ \� actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 \ Building Canopy - \ z degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East or 129.14 feet to the southerly \ \ , 7p0 line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. \ / tip EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: i '\ a PID 258900010 That part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, shown as Parcel 208B on 4�53 Existing One Story Building \ Owner HOLIDAY STA RON STORES INC Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 Fled \ 445-46J West 79th Street \ / .I March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. I Bmlding `A Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317 �_A \ South line of Lot 1, - sign / I O \ O Block 1, ZAAAX ADD1T70N �� r\ ,i \\ 7541 \\ \\\(\V Proposed Parcel Dlescription \ t \\ most easterly corner of Lot 2, \ \ Block i, ZAMOR ADD177ON PID 258900020 N85°,52•04gy 154,E Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plot thereof, \ 2°°5\�- � Q Drainage and UtI Easement per --- c \ Owner CHANHASSEN - - - - - \ \\ F,O� detail on the plot of ZAMOR AD0177ON - -_�\ - 4 _ _ - - _ _ - \ SHOPPES LLC I I t 1 Carver County, Minnesota; Wj \ Bituminous surface % EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: n I \ O �I \ 00 \ ' �+ Drainage and Utility Easement per ,4p \o 7 I V detail on the plat of ZAMOR ADD/RON v �o That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208E on °? \\� LOT Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plot No. 10-3 /_ 2 \l Weate/yllnPof LINVOTI208B �L' `"pS filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. z \ -- Existing PID Division Line Drainage and Utility Easement per / r O \ z detail on the plot of ZAMOR ADDITION \ Sign Easement per �\ u Doc. No. 35184 1 ro / r o a y c q ' � \ I \� �� x ��-------- Q Notes \ PID 258900021 1/y Owner CITY OF CHANHASSEN / `. / Fa I Q 1) The site is currently zoned BH-Highway and Business Services District per Site Investigation Report by HR Green, dated December 16, 2015. O \ \ / \\Q o Z Building setbacks: PID 258900030Front Lot Line = 25 feet Ownv CHANHASSEN INN \ , J / I Side Lot Line = 10 feet V Rear Lot Line = 20 feet �\\ s q. ft. or 1.322 acres. Bituminous surface \ Building Canopy � \ � a,n t 2) Subject property contains 57,588 `\ Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. . or 1.063 acres n \ \ a �tIORy �°sD° / I �` ft Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. or 0.259 acres \ \ PM \1 (R //�� 1 or0 a�t`12� I V 3) Impervious surface calculation \ ✓ / / -� I \ \ Concrete surface \ �� Pai R P \\ vX> 9� �IOtJ - f I Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. \\ ` /n�\ / ror)�. �„ ��EP20g8 II Building, Parking Lot and sidewalks impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. -4 Impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. / 82.0 Z Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. Impervious area = 0.00 sq. ft. / 0.090 \ / \\\ 0aa`rete ear a Mia WSotpj0 No. OY / / / \ t I Par gt" pt \\ �D ` 96. \\ \\ P esa c Qitatian R I � ` / I / � •f(� G \ J Sdaeolk _� o1`ifonsP �./ y`p0,t t o -A 2, Sign D Tom. line o p1¶0N 6 ° ao E\ �� 5a petiPMOR p0 \\ / 82 "oil NO • / � / NWT' I �, , ✓ ��,\, �� `� NK `t Way L/ 11 / idth ri9t't a1'0Y I / �Q e t V /\ I I 0. 20 40 60 r 1 dadtooted ri9r' I Nariaple /\ v E sa�a`a ' �pllcly < B1tam'noos r Daw 03/23/16 sheet 1 of 1 Westwood Prepared for: Chick-f it -A Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive tea: CI � cGreen, Tnc FSU #03M Lot Sketch Adjustment Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 DMWM BM Sketch TadFtw (888) 937-5150 wes1woodps.aom New LAILOI Illinois Westwood PfafeI SeM4014 Im Record Drnaint byI AR Gseaa PraJeR Nmnbir 8619 W Chanhassen, b iiutesota 02016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. �. i t i t / P / fo / � t / t TR ' / m gTN 9^t of /1 (face dadvoted 5 so • poblidY Bit°min°U o / Existing Building \ t Pet (ION �7 ` EosemOR pppl / and pt°,tY°t 00< dltdg9oon the / / — / o / / o 19.8A Drainage and Utility Easement per --- _ detail on the plot of ZAMOR ADDITION PID 258900030 Owner CHANHASt Bituminous IRS, Building canopy -->- Right of Woy of 79th Street West per the plat of FRONTIER DEt,ELOPMENT PARK t I I I i I i I t I I \ Access t Dnvewoy 1 t tt t I t I I t 1 \ / t v 7g One Story Building 963 West 79th Street assen, Minnesota, 55J17 11.07 \ L_ V l 20 2\ \-detafi rainage and Utility Easement per � on the plat of ZAMOR ADD177ON \ x \ , , Existing Building PID 258900020 Owner CHANHASSEN SHOPPES LLC // r line of MNDOT - Parcei 208E \ EXCEPTION \ MNDOT Parcel 208B LOT 2 / / / ?U / / cps at 2 of % ON Sign - /E\\�\\ Sa°tneaetZPNOR �ptn ��•p1 OtpGl, TE 5TA \ - zoo \ w \ PID 258900010 all Ownor HOLIDAY STA 77CVV STORES INC \ w \ Of South line a! Lot f, —� � Sign \ O Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION ,� \ � t5•at `� \ ) \ \\ most easteny corner of Lot Z Block 1, ZAMOR ADD177ON N85°52'04'W 154.46` and Utility Easement per detail on V detail on the plot of ZAMOR ADDITION / V / Westerly line of MNDOT Parcel 2086 / Existing PID Division Line Drainage and UtilityEasement per z detail on the dot ofZAMOR AODl80N \ Sign Easement per �si Doc. No. 35786r000 (4 PID 258900021 \� Owner CITY OF CHANHASSEN /A / / 1 \\' - Building Canopy /. \ /t / ase'nON \ \\ / 010nptet at 1 / `N / \ Concrete surface \ ` j jD � per / \ / I / \ - Sign / 62;510 EX�e� 2oa / Sidewalk % \ N / / \\ to s°rfoce p'Po. 10-3 concrete er ha'eess Plot tt atN°we \ �\ contt l Pon pi9n StdeWalN o��nsP°r I TRNK No n L, INN A ht of W0Y • dth rig t of waY Variaa18 dsdicotad rig `tote publicly sa Pob BitUminoas v 'rating Parcel Descripdon PID Na 2589M20 Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following two tracts: All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, which lies Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on on assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zomor Addition, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described, thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating; and That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Deportment of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122254. nil Iv, 11 111''1111 All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, according to the recorded plot thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1 said ZAMOR ADDITION, for 154.54 feet to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East or 129.14 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 flied March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plot thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; EXCEPTNG THEREFROM the following tract: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Deportment of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. =071 1) The site is currently zoned BH—Highwoy and Business Services District per Site Investigation Report by HR Green, dated December 16, 2015. Building setbacks: Front Lot Line = 25 feet Side Lot Line = 10 feet Rear Lot Line = 20 feet 2) Subject property contains 57,588 sq. ft. or 1.322 acres. Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. or 1.063 acres Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. or 0.259 acres 3) Impervious surface calculation Existing Parcel PID No. 258900020 area = 46,309 sq. ft. Building, Parking Lot and sidewalks impervious area = 37,959 sq. ft. Impervious area = 37, 959 sq. ft. / 82.0 % Existing Parcel PID No. 258900021 area = 11,279 sq. ft. Impervious area = 0.00 sq. ft. / 0.0% Date- 03/23/16 sheet 1 OF 1 Westwood >Prepared for. Chick4i1-A Plane (952) 937-5150 7899 Anagram Drive `WM HR Green, Inc Psv #03M Lot Line Adjustment Fan (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 50" Uftwa BTw TOO Fee (888)937-5150 wasMsnadp.com New IRIIox, Illinois Sketch westwood Profasalond scrota Inc Bamsd °""'a` bFfdaee HK cram Pr*d N®bar WHIM Chanhassen, Minnesota SCANNED Design Intent Packag4 zoen %.....ha'nha, Perspective - Southeast 3/17/16 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM Chal iha,%* OeI111111111 MN STORE # 03840 Executive Summary,: Prototype: Custom Total Square Footage: Conditioned: 41775 SF Service Yard: 125 SF Footprint: 47650 SF Number of seats: Interior: 120 seats Exterior: 8 seats Registers: 6 Playground: Yes Kitchen Layout CL Drive-Thru 2 Order Point 1 Window LEER Project No Level: NA Landscaping Standard Seating Type Family ------------------------------ Design Leader ------------------------------ Interior Design ------------------------------ Kitchen & Systems Design •ila M G\TN T-11s410 DSEoi SCANNED MAR 8 2016 GH ANH ASSF,N P!9'NNING AEPZ . T. 4 N R $ e m @ 0 Cg,r RECEIVED CHANHASSEN MAR i A16 CHANHASSEN PONN ING ®EPT Executive Summary Custom Exterior Modifications Custom Interior Modifications Custom Front of House Modifications Custom Back of House Modifications Custom Perspective - Northwest Perspective - Northeast Perspective - Southwest 03/17/16 Perspective Views ., s - I e, c e o - c r s s . _ I. • • o • • e • e s ¢ a • • a • a • s s • • e • • • s • • • s • • a • • • • s • • a s • • c o s • • o • • ® a • • a • o • o • • :> a • ® a s 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM 03/17/16 Ijq11 FA- 97'-11 3/4" Floor Plan 0 4' 8' 16' Scale: NTS EC-1 a 9M ST-1 Elevation - South 64.3% Glazing Elevation - West 48.2% Glazing T/WINDOW 11' 44" B/DRIVE CANOPY 10'-0" T/ROWLOCK 3'-0" T/ SLAB 0'-0" 03/17/16 Elevations 9 9 9 a 3 9 a 9 9 a 9 8 6 9 4 _ .11 8 5 ® ® _ i 4 G K _ 9 U 0 9 s = n 9 + A 9 9 ® 9 0 @ R 9 9 i £ 9 9 9 e 9 9 9 f I- . 9 w 9 O a 9 9 4 9 9 9 9 4 ¢ 9 S G 9 Y 8 G 5 9 9 4. 9 9 9 W 9 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM See Finish Schedule for more Information a 9 9 S Y P 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 B O & 0 0 3 9 9 u T/ HIGH PARAPET 0'-0" EC-1 M ST-1 Elevation - North 50.3% Glazing Elevation - East 50.0% Glazing 03/17/16 Elevations 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM See Finish Schedule for more Information T/PLATE 18' - 11" 3R-1 T/ PLATE 14'-7" B/DRIVE CANOPY 10'-0" B/WINDOW 7' - 4" T/ROWLOC 3' 0" _ T/ SLAB 0'-0" SOAP N N # 3 8 i b b S f @ % S 4 N $ N W N N � S @ II 2 . _ 11 6 N % N $ N & * $ m 3 S A 4 ® N 4 -. _ _1 _ � I_ BR-1 Modular Size General Shale - Red Velour x . +�n r a' r r 1 e r � !� a �1 � • � „ +' + r A ' f e r P. ' . i r r il f " !• ♦ b Y a a } �� t r'';., a`;I b.. { .e � . i�.y ' a r s � 1 � } r _ a � BR-2 Modular Size General Shale - Silverstone PT-9 Sherwin Williams - Sher -Cry High Performance Acrylic #B66-350 Color: Dark Brown (Semi -Gloss) ST-1 Storefront YKK - Yes 45 Color: Dark Bronze Anodized (Matte) 03/17/16 Exterior Finishes 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN -CUSTOM WEST 79TH STREET 03/17/16 STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 5 Site O Plan (! " ., m ® . . s e ® ® ® s . . . . . a ® ® ® e . e a . . s a . o . . ,c . » . e m a a e e . s e . ® s a m ® • . a ® ® ® ® . 4 . . . . ® s ® r ® . . a • s a . ® r ® ® e e m . . » . a ,. n a a :u u w u u 0 % o v 0 o o o _ s * a o ® ® 0 woo Design Intent Package Chanhassen FSU, Chanhassen, MN 04/06/16 ................................................... 03940 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM STORE # 03840 Executive Summa Prototype: Custom Total Square Footage: Conditioned: 4,775 SF Service Yard: 125 SF Footprint: 4,650 SF Number of seats: Interior: 120 seats Exterior. 18 seats Registers: 6 Playground: Yes Kitchen Layout CL Drive-Thru Order Points 2 Window 1 LEED Project No Level: NA Landscaping Standard Seating Type Family Team Sign -Off Design Leader ——__—___________ Interior Design Kitchen & Systems Design A PA Execu Custom tmenor m=ncauons Spandrel glazing was added to the exterior of the building to meet 50% glazing requirements on the right of way elevations (North, East, and South). Cluck -fill -A sign on South elevation to be backlight with white LSD's. Interior Modifications Custom Front or mouse momncanons Custom Back of House Modifications Custom 04/06/16 Perspective Views ............................................................................................... 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM .00I Aag;& N 04/06/16 Context Sheet ........... .............. ................................................................................................................... ..... ... .............. 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM WEST Tan+ ST. i 04/06/16 ............... I ............. ........... ,.. 03940 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM Site Plan L FINISHI PROVIDED BV 1134 FINE TEXTURED STRATEGIC NG BRONZE #34 FINE TEXTURED STRATEGIC BRONZE 034 FINE TEXTURED STRATEGIC BRONZE N34 FINE TEXTURED STRATEGIC BRONZE BRONZE STRATEGIC POWOERCOAT .. HARDWARE STRATEGIC STAINLESS STEEL SUNBRELLA: ACRYLIC -a-g & Mt fl"n - South 6 .3%Chzing T/ HIGH PARAPET 21' - 0" _ T/PLATE is, -11" T/ PLATE � ——14'_�" C7 T/VNNDOW L1 11'-4' T/ROWLOCK 3— 04 & T/LAB 0LAB V Sn El,dgn-Wn[ 48.2%CIs zing 04/06/16 Elevations .............................................................................................................. 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM See Finish Schedule for more Information T/ HIGH PARAPET T/PLATE GLASS LEGEND CLEAR GLAZING SPANDREL GLAZING T/ WINDOW I 1' T/ROWLOCK � 3'_0" V T/SLAB 9_p" C7 .01dp aw-k 9A Ml adon - North W.3%Glazing T/ HIGH PARAPET n 2Y-o0" T/PLATE T/ WINDOW 11'-4' a,. T/ROWLOCK� 3--0" V TMLAB 0.- ©e IiOn -EW 50.0%Glaring 04/06/16 Elevations ............... ........ ....................... .......... .................... .......... I ............................ . 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM See Finish Schedule for more Infonnation T/PLATE Md _ _T/PLATE n 14'-7"" V B/DRIVE CANOPY BAM_NDOW n T-4" 7 TIROWLOCK I� 3' p"-V _ T/ SLAB n 0'-0 GLASS LEGEND CLEAR GLAZING OS SPANDREL GLAZING .000 90-10'-pA BR-1 Modular Size General Shale - Red Velour t ♦. s.. �. t-!.. •.. rr S• a r r Modular Size General Shale - Silverstone PT-9 Sherwin Williams - Sher -Cry High Performance Acrylic #B66-350 Color: Dark Brown (Semi -Gloss) ST-1 Storefront YKK - Yes 45 Color: Dark Bronze Anodized (Matte) 04/06/16 Exterior Finishes ....................................................................... _............ 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM Ma -a 9A or-» 31c 04/06/16 Floor Plan ................................................................................... _ .......... 03940 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM NOTE: ELECTRICAL ENGINEER TO REVIEW DIP RCP FOR CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT DIRECTIONS. COVERED - 'i ENTRY org 1� ■■a■■amamma ■■l \i► i �IIII ■II ■Iac�a►_�■■■■■►_�■■■i _ ►�C0011 • I- Cal a�[ia■■a■� '.: ',►q' . Iraq . No ;�■■■ COVERED ae ■■li�i�lEiiL'+ ■■Sri f7■ ■a■©■E NONE 0�16 N 04/06/16 Reflected Ceiling Plan ................................................................................................... 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSCN, MN - CUSTOM See Finish Schedule for more Information COVERED ry o I ENTRY 111-C 0-k-fKA KITCHEN mr-1 J** orm ra �r MECH. .. ...E METAL FLOORING BY FREEZER MANUFACTURER CRVICE.YAtt, D _J OFFICE I PLAY AREA n„n Ra 0 f R 6' N 04/06n6 Room Finish Plan 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM See Finish Schedule for more Information .000 0*9A effe � same - HMWA e WAU ,.MnNa.N,NlHm Pnn�awxnL�Tn,x.. .mILG.. W,L,,.ubP.E U 4N�� MLiW nbWC.xW LPN. P.YRtlY.V OPNP.1 m..e.owo,.wwmn x.... w x�.e mxoPN.pon,u�..e Pu�ioN �u nir m,ow..ann co. W....ouwWv.aa.awn li PM\IY. C npiwRl NN b�O YNNa MMYnm4ml.wY/ �nw1l.CaxI,W GRIINM M9 ../MOMMw.CCRnD.Ix]nP.WAPIM4VYI.INI nn.Mw DIREL(N.Y x [AOMN,t YMO. u..eaw �wm.L.wwrenum rmme Nraa..uY.wvo �,,..uln.wW run naw wiuxrlowNx.owcr,.n wmli r W V W aov.wP.cme. mmy�. ,axnlYwawWrun .+xPmPMrww wew.Nu..a.awlso/eowcrun ."".o�O:i iaawPneNaw a�N.-ne. ..nPPwW ran na W..Nm NW�aa o"'maP�.wau'�iNw.wu .W��o• w run u/aiKa ��nn-�w WwoiT.:u u�`Knelww.w w.+wrwev .P'.oarwv� awam W wNW.Wmwv� _ �,. Wwaw�mcFua w�wwm.PW. .� nrowenuYPe �m+n avme w"WON�w"m`sonuw l.siT Wmsu«T PWIOL 1Pnva. iM n. wVd.x. C Ww1\WIItsTxC DM/9VCG Pw.I.L NY PINT f4WpRw NiF D%IM,R mR®.ICIRa.LfaP,� .KM NMx1110. rNl W.CPI.Y PWI OS,Pnv.VxW Nu61WP PITY wTw>RFP,KKRVl N4 nwsPmx Llnw.R NxI�b IRCOq. TITN 41 N4p 4 NAnlxnmNl. �/lnmWDtn.x OV.rJMCN W W.CMNMbMIIY uoMnW.mMnM.MY Oxw.�CN.NY WNR 61 „/d.I.Ilw m 48' Channel Letters 60' Channel Letters m 60- Channel Letters Pylon Sqn Directional Enterwf Logo, aaow pa.;,rrw Directional D Thru vd Lag, array ® Drive Thu Clearanca Bar ® DrNe Thu Menu Baardf Canopy ® Drive Thu Menu Board/Canopy m PwV Panel- Pedestrian Crosswak DOT- Handicapped Parking DOT -Stop Sign ®. DOT- Do Not Enterf Stop DOT Do Not Enter ® PwV Panal- Curbside Detwery m Flag Pole M,E + eur r w e ^ varmirL 04/06/16 Exterior Signage Plan ................................................................................... I........ I................. 03640 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM 0 4' B'_ 16 Sala: 04/06/16 Kitchen Equipment Plan .................................................. _....... 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM a ,%tv ao-g;& 0 4. S' 18' Sub: 1R'=1'4' 04/06/16 Furniture Plan ..................................................................................... I ................ ......... .. 03940 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN - CUSTOM .00 IV - A MATERIALS & FINISH SCHEDULE (FURNRURE 6 DECOR) -Heritage Package �A � o- SEATING & DE=KE�Y� AMD INDUSTRIES PRODUCT (~to ) AMD INDUSTRIES PRODUCT (~to ) C ON SIGNS ^ Fumiture Schedule ................ . a400 ao-k-eT_R Pg 1/1 90W/)�b'31 cad&/ EW-WIM HMI//-HNI// WTT INC: 7 :,, LAW NWIMff• xlNt Y « n�' ��O-•v1W1i1M y�N� D AWL- iYl/I-XNIN docpath %011� fEIN-NIIIM �� qq��ii "RYI.VTi- / Fk'i�klsl ':E �; Qo 6p .o- Ca�rO❑ e I r��µ✓ sxw-XEIM �� 9 LATY 0FCHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAR 1 d 2016 Ca14NN%'5SE` FLPN'NIN3, Ft T WANNED EAST ELEVATION 260' 2 NORTH ELEVATION 260' 3 r•mo SOUTH ELEVATION 250' 4, WEST r SOUTH ELEVATION le'i" YW m ppiilli , , 1111111__. Illllltll OIIIiIIl0111 IIIIII111011111 •�1��. it lf�'—�� "1��1�tl1 R xu�nvs .e a.x 2 WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION i W ELEVATION q , i i iu d�mmn niminun lninuuu oirnnum _ one —TI". i SOUTH ELEVATION CC 2 WEST ELEVATION CC —n� nnnnrow�� x _ — vonenc n NORTH ELEVATION CC _ Y EAST ELEVATION CC - T117.4-S -•T Design Intent Package Chanhassen FSU, Chanhassen, MN STORE#03840 Executive Summary: Executive Summary Custom Exterior Modifications Custom Interior Modifications Custom Front of House Modifications Custom Back of House Modifications Custom PMMceve - Northwest Perspective - Northeast 03117116 Perspective Views ..................................................................................................................... 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN -CUSTOM NrS -4-II 5-rr-- _inin HUNK AGHVOr no. 03117/16 Site Plan ................................................................................................................................................. 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN -CUSTOM .00I Aag;& ET 64.3%Glazing -7 Elevation -West 48 2% Glazing TI HIGH PARAPET 21'-0" _ T/PLATE 18' -11" T/ PLATE t1 1LATE V T/ WINDOW 11' T/ROWLOCK � — 3�-0" T/ SLAB — 0, - p" V 03/1 m 6 Elevations ......................................................................................................... . 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN -CUSTOM See Finish Schedule for more Information T/ HIGH PARAPET _ T/PLATE 18'-1 _ T/ WINDOW _ 11' - Mo -a 7g'41A ............... TIPLATE n 18'-11" V T/ PLATE n 14'-7" V 3/DRIVE CANOPY BMINDOW 7 4" TIROWLOCK _ y TI SLAB I1 pV Etavatbn-North 50.3%Glaziig I Eli - Ea. t 50.0%Glazing T/ HIGH PARAPET 21' - 0" V T/PLATE 18' -11" T/ WINOOW 1V-4' na 1u-u v __ _ T/ROWLOCK n 3'-0" V _ _ T/ SLAB 03/17/16 Elevations .................................................................................................................... 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN- CUSTOM See Finish Schedule for more Information BR-1 Modular Size General Shale - Red Velour BR-2 Modular Size General Shale - Silverstone PT-9 Sherwin Williams - Sher -Cry High Performance Acrylic #B66-350 Color: Dark Brown (Semi -Gloss) ST-1 Storefront YKK - Yes 45 Color: Dark Bronze Anodized (Matte) 03/17/16 Exterior Finishes .................................................................................................... . 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN -CUSTOM 03/17/16 ................................................. 03840 CHANHASSEN FSU, CHANHASSEN, MN -CUSTOM 0 P v 16, ® N snb: Vs' -1'-0" Floor Plan .................................................. ,/ /_ _� _--- _--� �_ f _ __-_ __ - _- __ - ---_ �-- !,nren�ie ��_ I I I -_ �■= _ _ � � �= - __ _ _ u � - - - _ �� - - = - -_ _ � _= � �� E � -___ �r �_ � -_ �, f �_��_ �� -1 _ jl�� ,_- f _= _ _ � �- ._ Ld - 0 a i V Perspective - Northwest Perspective - Northeast Perspective - Southwest CITY OF CHANHASSEC RECEIVED MAR 18 2016 SCANNED CHANHASSENPLANNINuDFPI 5200 Buffington Rd. Atlanta Georgia 30349-2998 Revisions: Mark Date By PLAN COMMISSION SUBMITTAL 03-17-2016 Seal C C o v P U .y C �a 'oor! Gl m E m o W c g Li Q) s y P t y n N Ua�vm ND STORE: 03840 S13 CUSTOM 445 W 79TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEET TITLE PERSPECTIVES VERSION: ISSUE DATE: 03/17/16 Job No: 16-1459 Store: 03840 Date: 03/17/16 Drawn By: RA Checked By: ML Sheet A—1 1 a EAST ELEVATION 250' 1" = 20'-0" NORTH ELEVATION 250' 1" = 20'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION 250' 1" = 20'-0" WEST ELEVATION 250' 5200 Buffington Rd. Atlanta Georgia 30349-2998 Revisions: Mark Date By PLAN COMMISSION SUBMITTAL 03-17-2016 Seal v P = tl L rc W O C rc i!A U=o i�i t y a H O � Ua�d� N � H STORE: 03840 S13 CUSTOM 445 W 79TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEET TITLE LINE OF SIGHT 250 FEET DISTANCE VERSION: ISSUE DATE: 03/17/16 Job No: 16-1459 Store: 03840 Date: 03/17/16 Drawn By: RA Checked By: ML Sheet A-1,2 1" = 20'-0" 0T-11 '1/d" FLOOR PLAN 1 /4" = V-0" •i�� aAa7g;& 5200 Buffington Rd. Atlanta Georgia 30349-2998 Revisions: Mark Date By PLAN COMMISSION SUBMITTAL 03-17-2016 Seal C N Q► o Q e a v P � d C �mP V 8 O,O 47 z O m C W L d W i H O N d P U2 STORE: 03840 S13 CUSTOM 445 W 79TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEET TITLE FLOOR PLAN VERSION: ISSUE DATE: 03/17/16 Job No: 16-1459 Store: 03840 Date: 03/17/16 Drawn By: RA Checked By: ML Sheet A-13 SOUTH ELEVATION 1 1/4" = T-0" rtm. rwrvionvv . Vv�mc. invite S=SPANDREL GLASS �2 WEST ELEVATION 1 /4 = 1 -0 APET 1' - 0" 'LATE 'LATE 4' - 7" ADO_ _ W � NOPY 10' - 0" LOCK_ 3'-0" Vn SLA� 0'-0" T/ HIGH PARAPET 21'-0" T/_PLATE T/ PLATE 14' - 7" �1 T/WINDOW 11'-4" B/DRIVE CA OPY 10'-0" B/WI_NDOW 7'' - 4" T/ROWLOCK 3' - 0" T/ SLAB 5200 Buffington Rd. Atlanta Georgia 30349-2998 Revisions: Mark Date By PLAN COMMISSION SUBMITTAL 03-17-2016 Seal C f� /V� W o e d t P a E U C o QV -a 4)tya P V O Ua�� STORE: 03840 S13 CUSTOM 445 W 79TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEET TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS VERSION: ISSUE DATE: 03/17/16 Job No: 16-1459 Store: 03840 Date: 03/17/16 Drawn By: RA Checked By: ML Sheet A-1A E a EAST ELEVATION 1 /4 = 1 -0 NORTH ELEVATION 114" = 1'-0" S= SPANDREL GLASS T/ HIGH PARAPET n 21'-0"-V T/PLATE 18' - 11" `I T/ PLATE_ � 14' - T' v T/ WINDOW n 11'-4" V /DRIVE CANOPY 10'-0" T/ROWLOCK 3'-0-0" V T/ SLA 0' -0B_ -0 T/ HIGH PARAPET T/ PLATE 14' - 7" T/ WINDOW 11'-4" T/ROWLOCK 3'-0" V T/ SLAB 0' - 0" Z1 -'*� if i Apo 5200 Buffington Rd. Atlanta Georgia 30349-2998 Revisions: Mark Date By PLAN COMMISSION SUBMITTAL 03-17-2016 Seal C N 4 o a .o L P t N C r —'gory 4) oNyny i s O m c U'-=o ii. :E ti O 6 Uago STORE: 03840 S13 CUSTOM 445 W 79TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEET TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS VERSION: ISSUE DATE: 03/17/16 Job No: 16-1459 Store: 03840 Date: 03/17/16 Drawn By: RA Checked By: ML Sheet A-1,5 SOUTH ELEVATION CC 1/4" = 1'-0" - WEST ELEVATION CC 0. T/ HIGH PARAPET 21'-0" E -1_ 18'n 11" T/ PLATE 14' - 7" �1 T/ WINDOW n 11' - 4" �1 B/DRIVE NOPY 10'-0" T/ROWLOCK 3'-0" T/ SLAB 0'-0" T/ HIGH PARAPET� 21' - 0" �1 T/PLATE n T/ PLATE 14' - 7" �1 T/ WINDOW AL 11'-4" v B/DRIVE CA OPY� 10, - 0" B/WINDOW 7' - 4" V T/ SLAB 0'-0" V i 16 5200 Buffington Rd. Atlanta Georgia 30349-2998 Revisions: Mark Date By PLAN COMMISSION SUBMITTAL 03-17-2016 Seal Vf o e y a P C "�P D O N N Oan � y c C_ 0 0. L ti O N Ui O vn 0 NO F- STORE: 03840 S13 CUSTOM 445 W 79TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEET TITLE COLOR ELEVATIONS VERSION: ISSUE DATE: 03/17/16 Job No: 16-1459 Store: 03840 Date: 03/17/16 Drawn By: RA Checked By: ML Sheet A-1 06 NORTH ELEVATION CC 11 2 EAST ELEVATION CC T/ HIGH PARAPET 21'-0" T/PLATE 18' T/ PLATE 14' - 7" �1 T/ WINDOW 11'-4" 1 /DRIVE CANOPY 10,-0" T/ROWLOCK AL 3'-0" V _ T/ SLAB I0'" 7 HIGH PARAPET t1 21' - 0" �1 T/ PLATE -- 14' - 7" T/ WINDOW n T/ROWLOCK t , 3'-0" v T/ SLAB 0' - 0" i 5200 Buffington Rd. Atlanta Georgia 30349-2998 Revisions: Mark Date By PLAN COMMISSION SUBMITTAL 03-17-2016 Seal C V1 o Q a QI p d C " m a //�� U �=o D.do _r • DEW d O Ua0v� N 0 STORE: 03840 S13 CUSTOM 445 W 79TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEET TITLE COLOR ELEVATIONS VERSION: ISSUE DATE: 03/17/16 Job No: 16-1459 Store: 03840 Date: 03/17/16 Drawn By: RA Checked By: ML Sheet A-1,7 ITE MEMBRANE ROOF (TYP.) GATE POSTS FOUNDATION RE: CIVIL EDGE OF FOOTING BELOW 0 0 PIPE BOLLARDS EMBED BOLLARDS IN 18' DIA. x T-6" CONCRETE FILLED HOLE NOTES: 1. ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY SIZE & COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 2. re: civil for drainage -0'-6" TOP OF CONCRETE PAVING 12'-3 1 /2" 9" 0'-0" TOP OF 0 U 13'-4" 3,_g„ 4'-0" 9,_2„ 25'-4" FOUNDATION PLAN 6" DIA. STEEL PIPE GATE— POST (RE: CIVIL FOR LOCATION) 8" CMU #5 BARS at 32" O.C. MAXI (FILL CORE With GROUT) TYPICAL PIPE BOLLARDS (RE: CIVIL FOR LOCATIONS) brick veneer (br-1) capped conduit re: electrical FLOOR PLAN 1/4"= V-0" PREFINISHED METAL (DARK BRONZE) BRICKVENEER BR-1 / DOOR & FRAME - \ PAINT pt-9 12'-3 1 /2" c 4'-0" 4'-5" 34,_0„ e 0'-0" TOP B 00 o 8", 1 1 3A3.4 2'-8" T-8" 1'-8" _ R.O. 2'-0" O 20 REFUSE STORAGE LOW PROFILE TURBINE ROOF INTERIOR A3.4 VENTILATOR SUPPLIED AND PAINT pt-5 INSTALLED BY G.C.) - J drain or blockouts through STORAGE exterior walls as required re: civil note: Seek sheets for REQ'D. shelving O O #5 BARS at 32" O.C. MAX (FILL HYDRANT 25'-4" CORE With GROUT) 8" RE: P1.16' 8" 34,_8„ NOTE: ALL CMU WALLS - PAINT pt-7 (u.n.o.) - (MATCH BRICK IF NOT PROTOTYPICAL) PAINTED STEEL GATE POST TYPICAL (PAINT pt-9) FRONT ELEVATION PREFINISHED METAL (DARK BRONZE) BRICK VENEER #1 RE: FINISH SCHEDULI A2.1 SIDE ELEVATION 1/4"= 1'-0" DOUBLE GATES WITH PREFINISHED 1 x 4 PLASTIC LUMBER (EARTHCARE PRODUCTS (1-770-455-3602) WEATHERED WOOD) SECURE TO STEEL FRAME WITH THRU BOLTED CARRIAGE BOLTS - 4 PER trim BOARD PAINT HEADS DARK BRONZE DROP ROD RE: 5A3.4 RE: 3A1.7 9A3.4 _ PARAPET BEYOND 8'-8„ / TOP OF CMU BOND BEAM _ 10A3A BRICK VENEER 1' \ BR-1 BASE SHEET TOP OFF I CMU ;} CDX PLYWOOD 2X6 RAFTERS @ 16" O.C. 12' CDX PLYWOOD - PAINT COLOR #6 STORAGE REFUSE AREA reinforced CMU #5 REINF BARS RE: 2A3.6 Ali. j''° brick veneer (BR-1) TRUSS TYPE JOINT REINF. @ 16" 'Y 8" CMU RUNNING BOND O.C. VERTICALLY PAINT COLOR #7 I> BLOCK FILLER WITH ONE COAT OF PRIMER & ONE ONE COAT OF PRIMER & ONE - COAT OF EPDXY PAINT j{- COAT OF PAINT COLOR #2 (COLOR #7) 11. 4" CONCRETE SLAB WITH 6/6 �; a #4 HOOKED DOWELS @ 16" W1.4 x W1.4 W.W.M. F o.c./ provide tension lap witjl l wall reinf. p, 6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER la 4" continuous BRICK jll SEAL FLOOR 6" CONCRETE LEDGE ZZ SLAB !:"I 1 0'_6" TOP OF SLAB ---� --�' - --- - -° ----� 2 #5 CONTINUOUS \\\ �\ / / / /\\ �\\ �\\ �\\ �\\ �\\ �\\/\\�\\/\\\ �\\ �\\ �\\ �\\ �\\ �\\ �\\/ / / / /\\ � vertically TOP 2 #5 CONTINUOUS %/, /. /.%/.//i.//i�/i.//i�/i//i//i.!i.//i.//i//i.//i//i.//i.//i.//i✓. : ///.0 TOP D �l C9 o °DCDRE: STRUCTURAL 6 FOR FOOTING DEPTH A3.4 SECTION 81, 4" 0'-0" top of slab -0'-6" grade 1x4 EARTHCARE PREFINISHED TRIM SURROUND 1" DIA. STEEL DROP ROD - paint PT-9 0 6" LONG DROP ROD GUIDE - paint PT-9 TOP OF CONCRETE PAVING 1-1/4" DIA. DRILLED HOLE IN CONCRETE DRIVE DROP ROD DETAIL 3/4"=1'-0" 6" PIPE BOLLARD GATE POST PAINT pt-9 RE: CIVIL 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT material hold down 1" and fill with sealant CONCRETE PAVING RE: CIVIL 6" MIN. CRUSHED STONE BASE POST FOUNDATION RE: CIVIL /,ri,•i••�,afi�r/ter 2 #5 CONTINUOUS BOTTOM #3 ties @ 48" o.c. —TIP. I I'---------- �/.\// 2'� o" W�/�\�/. 1-#5 BAR 6/6 W1.4 x W1.4 W.W.M. 6" THICK CONCRETE SLAB a a a� 4 a X 6 MIL POLYETHYLENE VAPOR BARRIER 2,_0:. REFUSE PAD AT CONCRETE PAVING DETAIL 3/4"=1'-0" 5'-9 1/2" PAINTED STEEL POST CAPS (TYP) 5'-9 1/2" 2" PAINT pt-9 COLLAR HINGES (TAP & ADD GREASE FITTINGS AT EA. HINGE -GREASE HINGES AFTER PAINTING) 2-1/2" X 2-1/2" PAINTED STEEL TUBE GATE FRAME -PAINT pt-9 6" DIA. PAINTED STEEL PIPE POST EACH SIDE- PAINT pt-9 1-1/2" x 1-1/2" PAINTED STEEL BRACE - PAINT pt-9 lal. NOTE: 1 x 6 PREFINISHED PLASTIC PAINT GATE FRAMES, LUMBER (TYPICAL) ATTACHED HARDWARE &PIPES �1 TO STEEL FRAME With PAINT pt-9 TYPICAL DO 1/411= 1'-0" gate posts foundation re: civil UBLE GATE ELEVATION METAL COPING (DARK BRONZE) SS SCREWS W/ NEOPRENE 2 X 12 TREATED TOP PLATE WASHER @ 48" O.C. CONT. CLEAT MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF BASE SHEET 8-8 -0 12' CDX PLYWOOD DECKING P�F bI BOND BEAM W/ 2 - #5 BARS --° - 2X6 RAFTERS @ 16" O.C. BRICK VENEER PLYWOOD CEILING - PAINT BR-1 COLOR #6 Y�" DIA. ANCHOR BOLTS @ 48" O.C. 12' DIA. ANCHORS, EPDXIED 8" CMU INTO CMU @ 32" O.C. #5 REINF BARS LUS26 HANGAR RE: PLAN 2 x 8 TREATED LEDGER ROOF EDGE DETAIL 9 1 1/2"=V-0" Note: 1. provide nailing per SIMPSON requirements for all SIMPSON Connectors 40 mil. single -ply PVC roof U.S. INTEC APPROVED#slo MEMBRANE by duro-last BASE SHEET 10 d nails at 6" o.c. 5/8" CDX PLYWOOD dec 'IECE METAL DRIP EDGE DARK BRONZE SIMPSON h3 hSIMPSON a35 clip at ties at every joist16" O.C. (between joist) 2x BLOCKING as required 7'-4" 8" HARDIE PLANK - TOP OF CMU paint color PT-7 2x6 RAFTERS at 16" O.C.LTI hit HY 150, 112 " dia. x 4 1/4" bed epoxy anchor bolt at 48" o.c. 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD CEILING PAINT COLOR PT-1A caulk /sealant CMU exterior face - paint PT-7 BOND BEAM WITH 2 - #5 BARS CMU interior face - paint color PT-5 STORAGE REFUSE AREA 10 ROOF EDGE DETAIL 1 1/2"=t'-0" SS SCREWS W/ NEOPRENE WASHER @ 48" O.C. MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF METAL COPING 4 8' 8" (DARK BRONZE) o a TUP OF CMU a� CONT. CLEAT " o BASE SHEET BRICK VENEER - 2X6 RAFTERS BR-1 a a o CONCRETE FILLED HEADER GALVANIZED STEEL LINTEL W/ 145 REBAR RE: STRUCTURAL 7-4" . F.F SEALANT, TYPICAL ALL SIDES GROUT SOLID H.M. FRAME paint dark bronze EXTERIOR STORAGE 7 7 1 HEAD DETAIL EX- 8" CMU BRICK VE BR-1 H.M. door paint dark 12 JAMB 1 1/2"=1'-0" STORAGE CONCRETE FILLED CELL W/ 1-#5 REBAR SEALANT, TYPICAL ALL SIDES 3 ANCHORS PER JAMB GROUT SOLID 5200 Buffington Rd. Atlanta Georgia 30349-2998 Revisions: Mark Date By PLAN COMMISSION SUBMITTAL 03-17-2016 Seal 0 .y o Q e a r C d N F w 8 D O H Gl o „h a Q (D QI ='"s N O N LO 6 < Ua�dm now STORE: 03840 S13 CUSTOM 445 W 79TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEET TITLE REFUSE ENCLOSURE VERSION: ISSUE DATE: 03/17/16 Job No: 16-1459 Store: 03840 Date: 03/17/16 Drawn By: RA Checked By: ML Sheet A-1 8 3 U) N I i M 0 0 LO rn 3 D z a J w 0 0 0 I z a J a_ w N m c o a o+ `0 o - � o m> 3> �o cl rn o N '- � N I¢ m X D x I � M .. Cr 0 � I (p N 60 3 t � U O• 0 n� U w U mw X V) MUw a o�o W I o o U 0 J 00 I w a 0 ml 0 N O > t O 0 TU >2 o NI o via �_ J 00 Q 00 E o'er o PO = a 3 0�10 r%i�Zp I M c U a / O 00 M O M O 6r U N O U m NO � <MO GU OC 0 O NUIL n o O O Y t o U 0 / EOC S: Cn 5 m.- w— v X m w 0 N N p O N O EO ax`E0 APPLICANT INFORMATION: PROPERTY APPLICANT AND BUSINESS OWNER: CHANHASSEN 9478 RILEY V EDEN PRAIRIE, &AA PHONE: (651) JAY SCOTT 5200 BUFFINGTON ROAD ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30349-2998 ENGINEER (404)-684-8530 MR. JASON HILL, P.E. HR GREEN, IN EMAIL: jason.hill@chick—fil—a.com 420 NORTH FI MCHENRY IL. PHONE: (815) TYPE OF USE: JOSEPH F. VA COMMERCIAL QUICK SERVICE RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE—THRU ARCHITECTS: LANDSCAF CHIPMAN DESIGN ARCHITECTURE, INC HR GREEN, INC 2700 S. RIVER ROAD, SURE 400 420 NORTH FIR DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS 60018 MCHENRY IL. 6 PHONE: (847) 298-6900 PHONE: (815) GERARDO LOPEZ - PROJECT MANAGER MARISA A. RON UTILITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: CONTACTS: CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MN SANITARY SEWER: 7700 MARKET BLVD WATER SERVICE: PO BOX 147 CITY ENGINEERING: (952) 227-1165 CONTACT — STEPHANIE SMITH STORMWATER: CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MN 7700 MARKET BLVD PO BOX 147 (952) 227-1168 C-ONTACT — TERRY JEFFERY FIRE INSPECTIONS: CITY OF CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT 7700 MARKET BLVD PO BOX 147 (952) 227-1151 CONTACT — FIRE MARSHAL — MARK LITTFIN EMAIL: mlittfin@ci.chanhaseen.mn.us ELECTRIC SERVICE: XCEL ENERGY 710 SOUTH PINE STREET WACANIA, AN 55837 (952) 470-3321 CONTACT — LINDA MACHERNEHL TELEPHONE SERVICE: CENTURYLINK (612) 861-8781 CONTACT — MICHEAL SPIEKER GAS SERVICE: CENTERPOINT ENERGY (612) 321-5435 CONTACT — CHERIE MANSON ROADWAY AUTHORITY: MNDOT RIGHT —OF —WAY —METRO DISTRICT 14500 MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 1500 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 (952) 607-6512 CONTACT — JON LACHO 1-800-252-1166 WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SITE BENCHMARKS: SITE BENCHMARK #1: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTROL POINT "1002 AW 1", MINNESOTA ELEVATION = 959.12 FEET (GRAPHICALLY NOT SHOWN) 445 WEST 79TH STREET CHANHASSENo MN. 55377 SITE BENCHMARK j2- HYDRANT TOP NUT. LOCATED WEST APPROXIMATELY 19 FEET AND SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 90 FEET FROM NORTHLASTERLY PROPERTY CORNER. RIM ELEVATION = 952.18 FEET SITE BENCHMARK #3: TOP OF CAST IRON MONUMENT. LOCATED AT SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER AND NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 5 ELEVATION = 950.60 FEET CALL: 1-800-252-1166 WITH THE FOLLOWING COUNTYCMVER — TW 116, RNG 023, SEC 13 CITY —TOWNSHIP C44NHASSEN — CHANHASSEN PARCEL ID. NO.# 258900020 & 258900021 48 hours before you dig (Excluding Sat., Sun. & Holidays) MINNESOTA COUNTY MAP CURRENTLY ZONED BH - HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS SERVICES DISTRICT VICINITY MAP LOCATION NOTE: HR GREEN, INC. IS TO BE NOTIFIED 3 DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. • HR GREEN, INC. SHALL BE INCLUDED IN ALL PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS. • PLANS WERE PREPARED WITH THE INTENTION THAT HR GREEN, INC. WOULD BE CONTRACTED TO PERFORM ALL THE CONSTRUCTION STAKING TO FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AS DESIGN INFORMATION MAY HAVE BEEN SIMPLIFIED REGARDING CALLOUT DESIGNATIONS. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THIS PLAN SET MUST BE NOTED AND HR GREEN, INC. NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION SO THAT ANY DISCREPANCIES CAN BE RESOLVED. J 11 HRGreen COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE. W., SUITE 40ON I St. PAUL, MINNNESOTA 55114 Phone: 651.644.4389 1 Toll Free: 800.728.7805 1 Fax: 651.644.9446 1 HRGreen.com SHEET INDEX CIVIL/SITEWORK C-0.0 COVER SHEET C-0.1 GENERAL NOTES, SPECIFICATIONS & LEGEND C-0.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C-1.0 DEMOLITION PLAN C-2.0 SITE PLAN C-3.0 GRADING PLAN C-3.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN PS-1.0 SITE PLUMBING PLAN C-4.0 CHICK—FIL—A STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C-4.1 CHICK—FIL—A STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C-4.2 CHICK—FIL—A STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C-4— CHICK—FIL—A STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C-5.0 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS LAN:GAPING L-1.0 TREE PRESERVATION LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1.2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L-1.3 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS LIGHTING PLAN ES2.1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AUTOTURN EXHIBIT AT-1.0 AUTOTURN EXHIBIT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE 3/17/16 TODD M. RICHARDS LIC.NO. 52503 Pages or sheets covered by this seal: C-0.0—C-0.1, C-1.0—C-3.1, PS-1.0, C-4.0—C-5.0. SC,1wiVED '��"ti OFCAS3EAi RECEIVED MAR 18 2016 CHANH9SENPCA6!Nlb'^- 5- ` IN" - Sheet C-000 SPECIFICATIONS & GENERAL NOTES All items of this project shall be governed by specifications included in the documents listed below: A. Minnesota Plumbing Code, (Latest Edition). B. Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction, (Latest Edition). C. Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, (Latest Edition) by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. D. Manual on uniform traffic control devices (MUTCD), (Latest Edition). specifications, In addition the following special provisions supplement the said and in case of conflict with any part or parts of said specifications, these special provisions shall take precedence and shall govern. 1. SCOPE OF WORK. The proposed improvement consists of supplying all the necessary labor, material and equipment to satisfactorily construct and install all improvements according to the plans designated as CHICK-FIL-A, Chanhassen, MN. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES A. Excavation: Where working conditions and right-of-way permit, pipe line trenches with sloping sides may be used. The slopes shall not extend below the top of the pipe, and trench excavations below this point shall be made with vertical sides with widths not exceeding those specified herein for the various sizes of pipe. Open -cut trenches shall be sheeted and braced as required by the governing State and Federal laws and municipal ordinances, and as may be necessary to protect life, property, or the work. Where firm foundation is not encountered at the grade established due to unsuitable soil, all such unsuitable material shall be removed and replaced with approved compacted granular material. B. Removal of water: Contractors shall, at all times during construction, provide and maintain ample means and devices with which to remove and properly dispose of all water entering the excavations. No sanitary sewer shall be used for disposal of trench water. C. Bedding of pipe: All pipe shall be installed on a bed of approved, compacted granular material unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The bedding and backfilling of excavated materials shall cleared with City first and be installed as per typical trench backfill detail. D. Special backfill: Whenever the excavation is in existing or proposed street, parking areas, driveways, or other paved areas, the trench shall be backfilled per Class B bedding, compacted in place. The top 12" of the backfill shall be filled with rood gravel or crushed stone and maintained as a temporary surface for the normal use of the area. Special backfill shall be compacted in place to ninety-five percent (95%) of maximum density at optimum moisture as determined by the Standard Proctor Test. E. Restoration of drainage: As soon as possible after backfilling the trench, all ditching, grading and shaping necessary to restore the original drainage in the area of work shall be performed. Culverts removed during the course of the work shall be replaced as soon as practicable. Adequate temporary drainage facilities shall be provided during construction. F. Utilities: The Contractor shall notify all utility companies prior to the installation of any pipe lines. Where conflict exists between underground utilities and the proposed underground piping requiring a revision to the plans, such construction shall not be undertaken until such changes are approved by the City Engineer in writing. G. Removal of Storm and Sanitary Sewer Pipes: This work consist of removing and disposal of all storm and sanitary sewer structures and related pipes as shown on the plans. Storm and Sanitary Sewer removal will be paid for at the contract per lineal foot price. Structures shall be paid for at the contract unit price each. Both are to include all labor to remove the pipes and structures 3. The subgrade shall be free of unsuitable material and shall be prepared in accordance with the recommendations noted in the geotechnical report prepared by Giles Associates, Inc. dated February 23, 2016 for this project. Testing for compaction shall be the responsibility of the contractor. The City of Chanhassen will require a proof -roll test if warranted by final soil compaction. This also applies to the parking lot and aisle subgrade and also upon gravel placement. All topsoil and any organic materials MUd be removed. 4. Easements for the existing utilities, both public and private, and utilities within public rights -of -way are shown on the plans according to available records. The Contractor shall be responsible for determining the exact location in the field of these utility lines and their protection from damage due to construction operations. If existing utility lines of any nature are encountered which conflict in location with new construction, the Contractor shall notify the Engineer so that the conflict may be resolved. 5. Contractor shall be responsible for securing all Permits including municipal permits. 6. INSPECTION. All improvements shall be subject to inspection by a duly authorized and qualified City inspector both during the course of construction and after construction is complete. The Inspector shall have authority over materials of construction, methods of construction and workmanship to insure compliance with working drawings and specifications. The Contractor shall provide for reasonable tests and proof of quality of materials as requested by the Inspector. The contractor shall notify the City of Chanhassen, Building Department at least 48 hours prior to any storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water main, or paving operations. 7. PIPE MATERIAL. Material permitted for use in sanitary sewers and services shall be PVC SDR 26 meeting the requirements of ASTM D3034. Installation of sanitary sewer pipe must comply with the requirements of ASTM D2321. B. CLEANOUTS. Sanitary sewer cleanouts must be provided at intervals not to exceed 100 feet and shall be of the same nominal size as the pipes they serve per Minnesota Rules, part 4715.1010. Manholes may be placed at intervals not to exceed 200 feet. 9. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. Gravity grease interceptors must comply with Minnesota Rules, port 4715.1105. 10. Wherever a sewer crosses under a water main, the minimum vertical distance from the top of the sewer to the bottom of the water main shall be 18". Furthermore, a minimum horizontal distance of 10' between sanitary sewers and water mains shall be maintained. If either the vertical or horizontal distances described above cannot be maintained, or the sewer crosses above the water main, the sewer pipe shall be pipe of water main type quality, or the water main shall be encased in a steel sleeve for a perpendicular distance of 10' on each side of the sewer. 11. WATER AND SEWER - Pipe and Structure material shall follow Minnesota Plumbing Code Specifications. 12. SAN. MH, 48" DIA. Manholes shall be constructed of prefabricated concrete sections meeting the requirements of ASTM C-478. Sections shall be joined using either flexible rubber gaskets or preformed bituminous plastic gaskets. The manhole bottom shall be precast with the first riser section. Manholes shall have the pipe cast in place through the manhole or a water tight joint cast in the manhole wall to receive the pipe. Manhole frames and lids shall be of self-sealing type Neenah R-1642 with concealed pick holes Type E or equal with approval by the municipality, 13. Sanitary sewer manholes shall be 4'-0" diameter precast structures, with appropriate frame and lids. Resilient connectors, conforming to ASTM C-923, shall be used between manhole and pipe(s). 14. All manholes to be eccentric, lids to have utility name. 15. All manholes and valve vaults shall be equipped with steps. 16. STORM SEWERS. Storm sewers shall be of reinforced concrete pipe meeting the requirements of ASTM designation C76. Pipe class shall be determined using the standard specifications listed previously. All joints and connections in the storm sewer system shall be in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0700 and have 0-rings to provide a water tight seal. See Storm Sewer Tags on Sheet C-3.0 for detailed information. 17. STORM SEWER FRAMES AND LIDS. Frame and grates designated on the plans as open lid shall be Neenah R-2504 or approved equal. See plans for appropriate open lid style. All frames and grates in the B-6.18 curb and gutter shall be Neenah R-3235 type "C" grate or approved equal. 18. WATER SERVICES. The domestic water services shall be 6" with valve and valve box as shown on the site plumbing sheet unless otherwise noted. The closed lid on vaults shall have the word "Water" cast in the lid. Materials and installation of water services must comply with the standards specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0510. Copper water distribution piping must meet ASTM Standard B88 per Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0520. 19. PROTECTION OF WATER MAIN AND WATER SERVICE LINES. Water mains and water service lines shall be protected from sanitary sewers, storm sewers, combined sewers, house sewer service connections and drains as follows; A. Water Service Lines (1.) Horizontal Separation a. Water mains shall be laid at least 10' horizontally from any existing or proposed drain, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, combined sewer or sewer service connection. b. Water mains may be laid closer than 10' to a sewer line when: (1) Local conditions present a lateral separation of 10% (2) The water main invert is at least 18" above the crown of the sewer; and (3) The water main is either in a separate trench or in the same trench on an undisturbed earth shelf located to one side of the sewer with a minimum vertical separation of 18". C. Both the water main and drain or sewer shall be constructed of slip-on or mechanical joint cast or ductile iron pipe. The drain or sewer shall be pressure tested to the maximum expected surcharge head before backfilling. (2.) Vertical Separation a. A water main shall be laid so that its invert is 18" above the crown of the drain or sewer whenever water mains cross storm sewers, sanitary sewers or sewer service connections. The vertical separation shall be maintained for that portion of the water main located within 10' horizontally of any sewer or drain crossed. A length of water main pipe shall be centered over the sewer to be crossed with joints equidistant from the sewer or drain. b. Both the water main and sewer shall be constructed of slip-on or mechanical joint cast or ductile iron pipe, or PVC pipe meeting requirements of Section 653.111 when: (1) It is impossible to obtain the proper vertical separation as described in (a) above; and (2) The water main passes under a sewer or drain. C. A vertical separation of 18" between the invert of the sewer or drain and the crown of the water main shall be maintained where a water main crosses under a sewer. Support the sewer or drain lines to prevent settling and breaking the water main. d. Construction shall extend on each side of the crossing until the normal distance from the water main to the sewer or drain line is at least 10'. B. Special Conditions. Alternate solutions shall be presented to the City when extreme topographical, geological or existing structural conditions make strict compliance with (1) and (2) above technically and economically impractical. Alternate solutions will be approved provided water -tight construction structurally equivalent to approved water main material is proposed. 20. The Contractor may not remove any material from the site except as directed by the Owner or Engineer in the case of excess material. 21. EROSION CONTROL. It shall be the Contractors responsibility to properly control erosion on the jobsite. Any siltation of conduits, structures, or ditches shall be cleaned and maintained by the Contractor until the seeding has taken hold. All washouts, gullies, etc. will be regraded and reseeded by the Contractor. The Contractors responsibility for erosion control shall extend throughout the construction process. The Contractor shall be responsible for clean-up of paved surfaces within and adjacent to the project on a timely basis and/or at the direction of the City of Chanhassen. All construction will adhere to the requirements set forth in the EPA's new construction site activities National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Storm Water Permit. It is the contractors responsibility to meet all requirements of the MPCA NPDES General Permit including completion of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). See Sheet C-3.2. 22. TOPSOIL PLACEMENT. Contractor shall place stockpiled topsoil or imported material on all disturbed areas with 6" topsoil raked smooth to be ready for landscaping (seeding, sod, etc.). 23. The Engineer and City of Chanhassen shall be notified if, during construction, any buried field tiles are exposed or disturbed. The Contractor shall reconnect said field tiles if deemed necessary. 24. All handicapped parking signs must have a $250.00 fine sign attached. 25. Lighting shall be constructed as per the Lighting plan, done under separate contract by Developer. All conduit shall be placed outside of any municipal easements except for authorized 90' crossings. 26. DISINFECTION AND CHLORINATION. All disinfection and chlorination shall follow Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2250. 27. TESTING OF PLUMBING SYSTEMS. All plumbing shall be tested in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820. All portions of the storm sewer system located within 10 feet of the building or water service line must be tested in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.280. 28. PRESSURE AND LEAKAGE TESTING. All water service/main pressure and leakage testing shall follow AWWA standard C600 and C605 Specifications. After the hydrostatic pressure test has been satisfactorily completed, all new work shall be subjected to a full -bore flush - 1000 G.P.M. flow test. The Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, tools and equipment necessary to perform the pressure and leakage tests. The Contractor shall satisfactorily perform the pressure and leakage tests prior to requesting the Engineer to and/or Building/Fire Inspector to witness the official tests. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer at least 48 hours prior to the time that the official tests are requested. Depending on traffic conditions, public hazard, or other reasons, the Engineer may direct when tests of new work shall be conducted, and may order the tests to be made in relatively short sections of new water mains. All testing shall follow City procedures and requirements in addition to those already listed. All testing shall be coordinated with Building Department and City of Chanhassen Public Works Department. It is the responsibility of the contractor to coordinate the required tests with the City of Chanhassen Public Works Department and the Building Department. 29. The Engineer shall be responsible for the following: A. To visit the construction site in order to better carry out the duties and responsibilities assigned by the Owner and undertaken by the Engineer; and B. The Engineer shall not, during such visits or as a result of such observations of the Contractor's work in progress, supervise, direct, have control over the Contractor's work, nor shall the Engineer have the authority over the responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor, for safety precautions and programs incidental to the work of the Contractor, or for any failure of the Contractor to comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to the Contractor furnishing and performing his work. Accordingly, the Engineer can neither guarantee the performance of the construction contracts by the Contractor nor assume responsibility for the Contractors failure to furnish and perform his work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 30. No construction plans shall be used for construction unless specifically marked "For Construction." Prior to commencement of construction, the Contractor shall verify all dimensions and conditions affecting their work with the actual conditions at the job site. In addition, the Contractor must verify the Engineers line and grade stakes. If there are any discrepancies from what is shown on the construction plans, he must immediately report some to the Engineer before doing any work, otherwise the Contractor assumes full responsibility. In the event of disagreement between the construction plans, standard specifications and/or special details, the Contractor shall secure written instructions from the Engineer prior to proceeding with any part of the work affected by omissions or discrepancies. Failing to secure such Instructions, the Contractor will be considered to have proceeded at his own risk and expense. In the event of any doubt or question arising with respect to the true meaning of the construction plans or specifkxrtions, the decision of the Engineer shall be final and conclusive. 31. Sawing of removal items as noted on the plans, or as required by the engineer, shall be considered incidental to the cost of the item being removed, and no extra compensation will be allowed, unless otherwise specified. All pavement removed within the 1-foot sawcut along the access drive shall be considered incidental to earth excavation. 32. All curb & gutter crossings over trench locations shall be reinforced with 2-#4 rebar extended 2' beyond each side of trench 33. All storm sewer pipe to have o-rings 34. CONCRETE PAVEMENT. The curing requirements should follow Section 3754 as noted in the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Latest Edition. 35. Joint Sealing shall follow Section 3725 of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Latest Edition. 36. The concrete curb shall be tied to the concrete pavement. Use No. 6, 30" long bar at 48" O.C. Alternatively the curb can be poured monolithically with the concrete pavement. 37. Contractor shall submit shop drawings of all curing and sealing materials to engineer prior to use. EXISTING r CATCH BASINS ELECTRICAL EQUIP. FIRE HYDRANT LIGHT POLE SIGN MISC DRAINAGE MANHOLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL WATER VALVE UTILITY POLE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE (DIA.) FOUND IRON MONUMENT IRON MONUMENT TO BE SET BY OTHERS EASEMENT LINE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER UNDERGROUND WATER UNDERGROUND GAS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC TRAFFIC CONTROL: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE CFA PARCEL AND OUTSIDE OF THE CFA PARCEL. THE CITY HAS THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES AS DEEMED NECESSARY. SYMBOL LEGEND Y _r\./'> -.111110. PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN/INLET INLET FLARED END SECTION VALVE VAULT WATER SERVICE VALVE WATER VALVE BOX FIRE HYDRANT WITH AUXILIARY VALVE REGULATORY SIGN UTILITY POLE UTILITY BOX SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER CULVERT PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN WATER MAIN WATER MAIN ENCASEMENT SANITARY FORCE MAIN ELECTRIC LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE LINE GAS LINE CABLE TV LINE FIBER OPTIC LINE CONTOURS SPOT ELEVATION DRAINAGE DIRECTION ARROW DRAINAGE OVERFLOW DIRECTION Sheet C-0. a2016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. ( \ �� -�� Pmpd y D&cdptiazt NOteB Legwd Property description per Fidelity National Title insurance Company Title Commitment Number 237841 0 BUSH/SHRUB / - Right of way of 79th Street fast A Lease between the Lessee and the Landlord as evidenced b the following documents. 1 This survey was prepared using Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Title / + i v/" per the plot of FROMM? DEKLO'AIENT PARK T-- }' 9 ) y P P g Y P Y CONIFEROUS TREE / f wAr�- w' Lease, dated _ —__— 2015, by and between Chanhassen Shopper LLC, as Lessor, and Chick-R-A, Inc., as Lessee, Commitment Number 237841 having an effective date of October 05, 2015, at 8:00 am. recorded -_----_, 2015 as Document No, ---_-_- DECIDUOUS TREE s+r--�/- Found Capped Iron Ptpe �f 2) Subject property appears to be classified as Zone C when. scaled from Flood Insurance rD' aP WAT_ i 1 inscribed License No, 22440 SAN as to the followin described roerr WETLAND / 1 SANS` 9 P P Y Rate Map Community -Panel Number 270051 0005 B dated July 2 1979. g war \ i / wAT ' sAN 0 STEEL/WOOD POST = SAN Parcel 1: 3) Subject property contains 57,588 sq. ft. or 1,322 acres. / ` t0' PVGSAN � �� V / R�Ei mw SAN } , Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; Property per Title Commitment area = 46,309 sq. €t. or 1.063 acres SIGN-TRAFFIC107HER /�1 vlP men `�- ce \ ; TUG i Proposed Property area = 11,279 sq. ft. or 0.259 acres SIGN-TRAFFrc/o7tlER / s�' / , 4a `° k' EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following two tracts: / of ,\ ; eK°�"� , All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, according the recorded plat thereof, which lies Easterly of the following 0 MAIL BOX 1 t of w A 4) The site is currently zoned BH-Highway and Business Services District per Site described line: Commencing at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees A WP led to ' ` AGCfis 10 minutes 11 seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, said Zomor Addition, for 154.54 feet Investigation Report by HR Green, doted December t6, 2a15. HANDICAPPED STALL 6,04 SPd , z 1 Dr) —ay ti °aw+r sNvx - \ �• � to an angle point in said boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described, thence South P R:rn elev = 95a92 pa4 65 - I ; 2 Building setbacks: G P£RC TEST Inv 5 - 839.07 2- _,.. -' t o 18 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East for 129.14 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating; $4d12 s� 1 ( 1" Front Lot Line = 25 feet tllP so, Inv w 9431 G PUG "'` i ti TUG I . O)N �c,Side Lot Line 10 feet ` POG.. TU i 1 c v-��•II and Rear Lot Line = 20 feet aw MONITORING WELL y a PUG 10' Pine ✓ 1 r �W r `7o r2 Ewa"" GABLE 7V BOX Ito TUG I 7hat part of Lot 2, Block 1, Zamor Addition, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Deportment of Transportation Right of Way 5) Subject property contains 49 total parking stalls, including 3 handicapped stalls. 5ts+ G z I Plat No. 10-3 flied March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284, P GAS METER �/ TUG i I 6) The underground utilities shown have been located from field survey information and STREET LIIE l -- 11.07 Parcel 2: WPs G• eme^tio a'%� \ existing drawings. The surveyor makes no guarantees that the underground utilities shown d Ut0'`ro Z` G I Easement for parking as contained and described in Cross Easement for Parkin doted July 25, 1996, filed Jul 29, 1998, as comprise a// such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. Tire surveyor further GUY WIRE e an lot i Found 1/2 Inch OPM Iron Piae E m p k g 9 Y Y / i does not warrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated (ro+o° gjO P,i // G o /'\ \ , . ; Document No. 198692. ro' POWER POLE PUG/ dotal!�1U o / ! although he does certify that they are located as accurately as passible from informtion �.// available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. (Gopher State , Abstract Property QE £e£crRtC BOX JUG One Call Ticket No, 160140058, 160140059, 160140060 and 160140061). /` � ._-...-g5i'-" `•-•.._..:"-�'•�. 1 \ ._ L_V ! f ,P27p Pro" DIe8C�1�7t�0It :�. ELECTRIC METER 7) 7ne bearings shown on this survey are based on the Carver County Coordinate System, E ELECTRIC MANHOLE / \ All that part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies N.A.D. 1983 (1986 adj), US Survey feet. vertical datum is NA.V.D. f988, Benchmark used �\ ° \ '�"\ •"'` 30.2`: ; ', ,. Drainage and utvtyEasement per easterly of the followi»g described line,' is Minnesota Deportment of Transportation control point " 1002 AW 1" elevation of 959.12, ® ELECTRIC TOWER / detail an me plat of ZAMIX7 AODf'RLW (14) / Faand Gapped hen Pam:.-- \ ' 7 ' ;' ,�,' not graphically shown; mecrabed L,°•nee No. 439333; Q r \ k,,! ExistngBuAdA,g Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 2,• thence on an assumed bearing of North 85 degrees 10 minutes 11 SANITARY MANHOLE \ /F ;`" ❑E ' seconds West, along the boundary between said Lot 2 and Lot 1, Block 1 sold ZAMOR ADDITION, for 154.54 feet to on angle 8) Adjoining owners shown per Carver County parcel website. rrvete surfac E point in sold boundary and the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 18 degrees 20 minutes cD SEWER CtEANOUT r Building conapy y, 00 seconds East or 129.14 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. 9) The subject property has direct access to 79th Street West, a dedicated public street, � � � `� ® BEEHIVE .CATCH BASIN The widths of all adjacent rights of way are indicated hereon, EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following tract: ® CATCH BASIN 6- ® 10) Field data collection an which this map is based was performed while snow was '• Roof Drain - ? That part of Lot 2, Block 1, ZAMOR ADDITION, shown as Parcel 208B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way 9 p J property. P y co all or art of the subject There is a possibility that existing® FLARED END SEC77ON s sP & ® Pm zSasDa0r0 Plat No. 10-3 filed March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. improvements that would normally be observable without the snow cover may exist. \ ' ® Owner- HOLIDAY sr4DOY STORES CULVERT „ *63 ! PID 258900020 � � INCING c \ Existing One Story Budding 11) Al! matters shown on recorded plats provided to the Surveyor are shown on the Survey, 445-463 West 79th Street \ ® (a STORM MANHOLE ri Existing dddkW ' Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55377 �/ aS6 s /, Budding Area = 9,684 sq. ft. South line of Lot 1, \ Block 1, ZAMOR AD0171ON .' III © ❑T TELEPHONE BOX \ „ }5,ai rD� e E - The following notes are in regard to Table A items 16, 77, 18 and 21. i9 8A \„ a a r TELEPHONE MANHOLE •, !, ,•. \ \ !� P... € \ Found 1/2 lrsrh Open Iron P¢De, -. } ;(, % 7 16) As of the date the field work was completed for this survey; there was no observable /�r�� i 8. Oat \ mast easterly corny of tot 2, i �' / CB ® TRAFf7C CON7ROL BOX Pine p� c.a ay�� x Block 1. 2AMOR AD017ION } .GAS [; I Rbn Fier - 94g.aD evidence of current earth moving work, exterior building construction or building additions. .�.,\ /, •, 2Q 45\~' `� Niles*52*04 e f 1 4 \ 0.44 ' NE of computed Tamer p 1 i lnr s 12� RCP = 94eL 60 \ Finish Floor Elevation 951:55 ._ _� ..\ ':..,. CA .t14.� J�GAs l` 1 f ` t, ;'( i ® HANG HOLE E. ) y proposed 9 9 Y Drainage and Uhlity Easement 17 As of the date of this survey, there are no ro °red changes in street right of wa dotal m the plot of ZANaR ADDIRfM' (14) ---� :�., Roof Dram `�:' `\�`- Fou9 -CapPod IronPipe-�4, — — "- — — _ — _ — — lines, based on a conversation with Steve Lenz,. City of Chanhassen Engineering Department. - TRAFFIC LIGHT r, z s tlfe `� qO6 8 - - - - - - - i ie ` As of the date the field work was completed for this survey, there was no observable \ BRuminaus surface �.' S70 p y ,p Oronoge and urliey Easement pe 7 t6� A $ -- evidence of recent street or sidewalk construction or repairs.. � GATE VALVE �4. \ 00 f. O dotal on the prat of ZAMOR AODMON (14) / • 9" Locust,; 4` 7 --,C', 1„ 5,cs� \..._ \.I r ,y�vgPi ,,UG ti qq BenchmarkDery font Hydrant '' \ 'S?,' \ \ i ce\� 70' re 5' Ash .` i o :' �g�h4@ /i P I P y 'l_P HYDRANT 18) As of the date the field work was completed for this survey, there was no observable \ ;, �.„ " ctrseterty line of MNDOr -1, ,• F . e A evidence of site use as a commercial solid waste dam sum or landfill. The Surveyor LQT L f • \ Parcel 2DB8 r' e 4 I P, PR WATER METER & e:� i CBMH recommends that an environmental specialist be hired to determine if there are any / 3 ye Rm Erev = 949.75 recognized environmental concerns situated on the subjectproperty.s �r}� • • .Y \ F• �" .,..� Orobid9c.rr(=d Utility Easement Per--'-''�^ • ,L ? �` O Mr NW 10' PYC = 946.70 9 i ❑. CURB 67oP BOX Ad1 mace PmvIdPI'8 .�!_ /. S'A \ ., I Inv N 12' RCP = 946.45 7 4' $race detoir an the plat of7'RAW,ADOVDaN (14; +-� � . 't I Inv NE ,2" RCP = 946.45 N:, t \ -.- 12-Locust��,� � � `' 21) Westwood Professional Services, Inc. has obtained a Professional Liability Insurance � WATER MANHOLE EEEMEEEEEM�/ N N $y\ I.� Sign Eosemmt per h / ` s = x i `r.I Policy to be in effect throughout the contract term. A Certificate of Insurance can be O „•. l 1 furnished upon request. TroMo Eng7nasrog, San/tary sewer A water �\ . , I. t. , WELL City of Chenhaseen Rine inn /F,' 7/ \ \ Doc No J5184 ]J + \` `, 4Qb - - y = • P q4, Sta�,enI@ Smith - " t 952-227-rile l , > F PID 258900021 1 Y.� - '�. yry ° t g POST 1NDtCATOR VALVE 7700 Market BW \ \ I Roof Drain i Owner CITY OF CHANH45 t•" .....t7.. -�` t1. .F w £ $ O �r PO Box t47 \ �'-f""�""'�' •-9,gj, I /� �. , a -' I The following notes correspond to the numbering system of Schedule B of the above Chanhassen, MN 85317 f P 9 FIRE DEPART CONNECT mentioned �tle commitment. —D,,� CABLE 7V Storm lthtr �, rn '_ - e' bah ".`..,_,..,. �� < 3 c . City of Chanhassen EngMsahg T bray \�'` �"`�� 11) Terms and conditions of restriction as contained in Warranty Deed, dated September 4, 9zz7-rise A-, '; l T A / _..r_... �d 700'Market 51rd \ \ ;; j�•,./,. ,! a 1970, recorded September N, 1970 as Document No. 09917. APPEARS TO AFFECT SUBJECT —cAs-- GAS LiNE Po Box 147 PID 258900030. f Chanhassen. AW $017 (timer a4ANHASSEN INN \ _: '�,,.. i a� r°' PROPERTY, BLANKET IN NATURE, NOT GRAPHICALLY SHOWN. —POH— POWER OVERHEAD C:1-1-7 hl Energy Gas utility`r-�., e 12) Terms and conditions of Easement, dated September 19, 1975, recorded February 23, chafe Manson 7' Ash 9�a \/ - -�/ I —PUG— POWER UNDERGROUND (612) 32I-54.z5 \ ' • -` I Q 1976 in Book 126 of Deeds, Page 3 as Document No. 28232. DOES NOT APPEAR TO Bituminous surface ��_ /y 8plding Canopy °" „„ \ 'p 1 \ # I I AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY. �`En ^ \ \`� S ': 1 }.•. i ` t i✓✓✓�,,,,/ \ \\ LU —SAN— SANITARY SEWER g c xra, 53eJ7 i ` \\ -�\ �:., 't '�, fan Ut4� nj \ id ' ,`i \, 13) Terms and conditions of Easement, recorded October 21, 1977 in Book 136 of Deeds, —sro— STORM SEWER 710 South pin, L'., en 1hv D\rl� Page 475 as Document No. 35184. APPEARS TO AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY, AS SHOWN at of / i \, 1 •os, \ 1 \ \ v pro d u 1 V HEREON. —�+— TELEPHONE OVERHEAD Stx"mi .era _ 1 b Poncrets surface 7ELEPH°NE UNDERGROU i�pN 14) Drainage and utility easements as shown on Plat of Zamor Addition, doted June 18, Traditiond relsphonsAtemet \ f 7 � ' 4 EP 6 1t°" 1979, recorded October 4, 1979 as Document No. 44313. APPEARS TO AFFECT SUBJECT Mono or f. \ - Nan _. - , R rl(j�{,y�kfj�/ ECG A of �" 0" II PROPERTY, AS SHOW HEREON. —wnr— wATERMVN 512-861-87E7 � \ �: .95t ....r\ /"/ �, y �8r ' ZQ� -o- jOPtw" —FOP— FIBER OP77C ONE MNDOT Right-of-MUy-Metro District ` \ 6z - ��}� \ otgaor�g� ,�a1'^'�W`` I 15 Terms and conditions of Agreement, t, dated December 26 1979, recorded December 28, Jon Lochn \ •"•; .63. ;` �.'`' Sidewalir �.. \ .� \ ,..^" Ira" a A,93 8 °d'a+* ) 9 —0— ACCESS CONTROL Mwf6i5iA7w Suss 15W 3 Found Sr1Ud ;- \ covP�eaas PAO 1979 as Document No. 45523. APPEARS TO AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY, BLANKET /N Eden Prams, MN 55344 "J 7 NATURE, NOT GRAPHICALLY SHOWN. x FENCE LINE _... \ F< a'�2.i5 inch Y r 950 `.....- t-' :. fop", N FoDu°r.�moa ..' RE 1 square tube I I VIM= MAP ! D k' Fn�m ' I 16) Terms and conditions of Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. -ter DECIDUOUS TREE LINE Not to Scale North T el a DOT �� 1��59 \ P� ,'"1167 \ - ��,� �•°°'�' I - � gi'� , 1 z 91'8'6A 10-3, recorded March 14, 1991, as Document No. 122284. APPEARS TO AFFECT SUBJECT A rA FE Ta. EXCEPTION '\ f /t1�ca °P cep° ` PROPERTY, AS SHOWN HEREON. Ap �A A� pt CONIFEROUS TREE LINE V. 76t�i ST. ` A I }•' O - y Inv V. VI L AGE RD. W W o W ¢ `�NDOT Parcel 20,g7� (16) wt 66 17) Terms and conditions of Cross Easement for Parking, dated July 17, 1996, recorded \ C X _, ° gsB CURB &GUTTER ¢ > > o< > V, 77th ST. £T' \ 'w" Ashy \ Icy s City _ < �qt \ \ `;y , / m' f ,woe t ae"`3 05) Jul 29, 1996 as Document No. 198692. APPEARS TO AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY, BLANKET l y,.. HG KHAN V £ ST; CHAN19 ¢ ti VI EW ST. \ i ,a�` / ',}. ''', rnP orsts ss aota pa. 10' Y 7Bth 1 6' Pine tc ' t5 / �' Go^ ne ,at IN NATURE, NOT GRAPHICALLY SHOWN. 78th SZ' \ ` " '(� Fl)P rho Ma WO A Y OI W \ r. e .,"^ � �96.�+- \ y /' \ al on tit a a W \ i t central Pe Rig r I > �_ 6 Pin,. t� 8 FOP t °°ssanypo�a ." w PAULEY DR. l9t sT• \ 6' P.Ne i -' Walk �_.-. c `' Cs i i O h L N 4 g¢ `/ w S,ae t T7 R E+ar = sresa ^ r v I Denotes set 127x14 Iron Pipe marked with a gas t s, ,nv w f2- RCP = 845.50 I �� Piastre Cap inscribed with ic. o. 3933, w CIR. CH n �.. "�� s et n0N l) I I•..` 1 unless otherwise noted ❑5 >> � £ w i ►E+ �ta� wG �1 /\ i'r \/ To Chick-fil-A, Inc„ Chanhassen Shopper, LLC and Fidelity Natrona! Title Insurance DR, t` 80 sp. ,d O/o3rd ��""e6• Z 'r' I!� �\ i I I Company. s Denotes Iron Monument Found as Hated. Site �t A y C I \1 ...- J 1 r va, rpQ _ Invaev 9 7s N -_ L� I� ` This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were ;' w'-.- NO /\ j/I I � Q Denotes Cost Iron Monument �awE SOP 5 X \ ' �1 'r f� i �f made to accordance with the 2011 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for i crRN A %\, +",yes3� _ a ^Y F'�/ I ice\ l( I �/ I U `' ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, _101 1JTA. / %<.--d TppeNo \ r lJ %1 �/ and udes 16, u w taan I i L\ �)�l' \ i I Table) Al hereotfmThe field3work 5was(�omplet(ed1� nBJanuaryb20,i2,016 17, 18 and 21 of L /- t of rrdl U Lake .. A(K tr r9F r p0y v I l I v ;` Suson �." 7 Qut4 va are etd to rant o q r s r, ro I f i\ Il e v 0' 20' 40' 60' / GG publicly8' miry s gJ t0`e 'T' L �'\ I r I I� \ I C f aI R 02103116 Mark R. Salo' Date FOR REFERENCE ONLY caw a Rim El" - 947.76 \ h ,\ I Minnesota License No. 43933 m C-0,2 My f 18' RCP - 94J76 i1 Inv S 24' RCP - 94.166 V V �q .Inv N. 15' RCP = -444.27 /16 my E 12" RCP = 944.31 r3t:.;'ate Westwood Phone f952) 9375150 7699 Anagram Drive Fmk 4962) 9375822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Tad Free le88)9375150 mixbNoodpamm Wauwood RafeWorul Servkq Inc CMIR. SAW Piepared 1w m.dmd: M" Dxwm SYW Rwmd aa+rins by/&* HR Green, Inc New Lenox, Illinois m rim f slat Numbs 86'LWt19 Ch o ck4flmA ALTA/A•CSM Land Title Survey C REMOVALS NUMBER R-1 BUILDING R-2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK R-3 BIT / ASPHALT R-4 CURB AND GUTTER R-5 LIGHT POLE R-6 WATER METER R-7 JELECTRIC TRANSFORMER R-8 TREE (SEE LANDSCAPING R-9 GAS METER R-10 MONUMENT SIGN R-11 BOLLARD R-12 GAS LINE R-13 WATER LINE R-14 TELEPHONE LINE R-15 SAWCUT R-16 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE R-17 12" CULVERT R-18 CURB AND GUTTER R-19 BIT / ASPHALT R-20 BIT / ASPHALT REMOVAL NOTES: • EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO BE REMOVED UP TO MAIN AND CAPPED AT TEE. • EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO BE REMOVED UP TO MAIN AND CAPPED AT TEE. \ — R-15 gW W � _ fjR 1453'G ��T uT ��T �5s \ UT ZJ UT -UT �17TUT 70 82. t \� U I� P % 11 II II 4 II II II II II 4 4 II II II 11 I �� II 1�#II 1 II 7't'pf$ R-20 \ W �\ W W W W �= W` W� W ` W_ W h R 3 W7 I.WA 14 II � I �I II II II a•C4 # \ \ \ \ ,o. \ \ 'r•7.rh \ \ � R-8 *� C�,st qsh / r R-8 R-s IT—� R-8 --_ —� s•P�e 6'P �• — -- � yZ / /J — — _ —T 64 4 E 96.38 R=�71 9FO_ FO �� N68`03'01 "E FO)1�.,- 382F0 FO---F0-- F� FQ-- FO — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — � R-1 ro S- UE�U r I \ — J \ G� �C9 \ s• \ � \ Zce \ \ yu.,, LEGEND INDICATES BIT / ASPHALT REMOVAL R_# INDICATES MISC. REMOVAL ITEMS (SEE THIS SHEET FOR SIZE AND QUANTITY) INDICATES SIDEWALK REMOVAL ' (FULL DEPTH) INDICATES BUILDING AND FOUNDATION REMOVAL -— - T. CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER ANDDENOWALLETO BE REMOVED uX DENOTES UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED INDICATES TREE AND BRUSH REMOVAL (SEE X' LANDSCAPING SHEETS FOR SIZE AND QUANTITY) INDICATES TREE AND BRUSH PROTECTION (SEE THIS SHEET FOR SIZE AND QUANTITY) PROJECT NOTES: • LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL APPROVAL TO DO SO HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY GOVERNING AUTHORITIES, IN ADDITION TO, NO LAND CLEARING OR GRADING SHALL BEGIN UNTIL ALL PERIMETER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. (INCLUDING STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PER THE DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA.) SEE SHEET C-3.1 FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES) • ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. • CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND COMPLY WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED IN PROJECT AND PAY ALL REQUIRED FEES AND COSTS. • ALL STRUCTURES & DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION & DISPOSED OF OFFSITE. • ANY EXISTING FIELD DRAIN TILES ENCOUNTERED SHALL BE RECONNECTED OR CONNECTED TO THE NEAREST STORM SEWER. • CONTRACTOR TO KEEP ACCESS DRIVE OPEN AT ALL TIMES WITH MINOR CLOSINGS ALLOWED FOR PAVING ACTIVITIES. • THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED NEITHER TO OBSTRUCT NOR REMOVE ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, NOR TO DISTURB THE EXISTING TRAFFIC PATTERNS MORE THAN IS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK. • CONTRACTOR TO STOCKPILE EXISTING ROCK MULCH IN LANDSCAPING ISLANDS FOR REUSE. SEE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN FOR DETAILS. HAUL OFF ANY UNUSED MATERIAL AT END OF PROJECT. • ALL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVAL AREAS SHALL BE SAWCUT AND ALL BITUMINOUS REPLACEMENT WITHIN THE TARGET PARCEL SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING COMPACTION AND CROSS SECTION OF THE EXISTING BITUMINOUS AND AGGREGATE BASE AT A MINIMUM. • CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONSTRUCTION FENCING AND SIGNAGE AROUND CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARIES TO PROTECT PEDESTRIANS. • THE ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS FOR THE LIGHT POLES SHOWN TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE TERMINATED EITHER IN HANDHOLES OR IN THE LIGHT BASE OF THE LAST REMAINING LIGHT ON THE TARGET TRACT. THE CONDUCTORS CAN BE ABANDONED IN PLACE. STAGING NOTES: (STAGING SUBJECT TO CHANGES PER SITE CONTRACTORS SCHEDULE AND METHODS OF OPERATION) 1. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND STOCKPILE STAGING 2. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES 3. PLAN REMOVALS 4. PROPOSED UNDERGROUND 5. GRADING 6. PAVING TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES: • ALL APPLICABLE CITY PERMITS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CLOSURE PERMITS, SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN CITY ROW OR LANE CLOSURES. • ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. • PERMANENT SIGNING THAT CONVEYS A MESSAGE CONTRARY TO THE MESSAGE OF TEMPORARY SIGNING AND NOT APPLICABLE TO THE WORKING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COVERED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN DIRECTED BY THE CITY. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS TRAFFIC CONTROL WITH OTHER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN THE AREA. • THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED NEITHER TO OBSTRUCT NOR REMOVE ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, NOR TO DISTURB THE EXISTING TRAFFIC PATTERNS MORE THAN IS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK. 5200 Buffington Rd. Atlanta Georgia, 30349-2998 0 S w STORE #3840 HANHASSEN FSU 445 W 79TH STREE -IHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEET TITLE SITE DEMOLITION P LAN DWG EDITION REVISION Job No. :86150413 Store :3840 Date ; 02 23 16 Drawn By : MRJ Checked By: JFV Sheet C - 1 0 SITE PLAN DESIGN NOTES & KEY PLAN El DIRECTIONAL ARROW _4 2 �2 DRIVE-THRU GRAPHICS _4 3 �3 STOP LINE GRAPHIC _q Q�4 PAINTED HANDICAP PARKING SYMBOL SA STANDARD PARKING STALL (9'xl8') PER CODE 5 -4. 5B 5C 4" SOLID WHITE STRIPING 5D 4" SOLID YELLOW STRIPING 5E 4" SKIP DASH YELLOW STRIPING 6 © DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE _q ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE "MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. (SEE SIGN LEGEND) 6A THRU 6E (SEE SIGNAGE LEGEND, THIS SHEET) 6F CHICK-FIL-A MONUMENT SIGN, SEE SIGNAGE PACKAGE 6G - - E 6H - - 61 - - 6J CLEARANCE BAR, SEE SIGNAGE PACKAGE 6K CANOPY ORDERING STATION, SEE SIGNAGE PACKAGE 6L - 6M 6N FLAGPOLE, 50', SEE SIGNAGE PACKAGE ❑7 SIDEWALK (ADA COMPLIANT) RAMP 7 -4. 8 ® HANDICAP RAMP w/ FLARED SIDES (IN SIDEWALK) _4 8A 8A HANDICAP RAMP w/ FLARED SIDES (GRASSED AREAS) _4 �9 RETURNED CURB HANDICAP RAMP 9 C-4.0 10 10 4 11 milTYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 5' MIN. 4 12 12 7' WIDE SIDEWALK w/ CURB & GUTTER C_q 12A 12A C-4. 13 a113DRIVE THRU PLAN 14 l4 DRIVE-THRU ISOMETRIC C-4. 15 15 C-4. 1 s 16 LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PROTECTO C_q, 17 17 24" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER C_q, 17A SPILLING SECTION �ITTt- 17B CATCHING SECTION 17C DEPRESSED SPILLING.T- 17D DEPRESSED CATCHING 18 18 C-4. 19 19 REFUSE ENCLOSURE FOUNDATION C_4, 20 CONCRETE BOLLARD 20 21 TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION 21 z q' 21A a l® HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT SECTION q, a 22 22 TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL CONTRACTION JOINT 0 0 J 23 23 TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL DOWELED CONSTUCTION JOINT C-4 a 24 CONCRETE APRON 0 TRASH ENCLOSURE 24 w -4. c ® PAVEMENT EDGE DETAIL 24A m -4. 25 0 25 CONCRETE PAVING ® DRIV THRU LANE a `0 26 ALUMINUM HANDRAIL C24. 27 3 27 C-4. T rr rrr rrrrr rrrarrrrrrraer rraomr r @- n 28 CONTRACTION JOINT Ld � o a 29 > al 29 KEYED CONSTRUCTION JOINT OZA -4. x r 0y: 30 g 30 LONGITUDINAL BUTT JOINT Oa■ 4. V 31 r v0 EXPANSION JOINT ■ _q, 0 4 rrr.rrrrrrr.rrrrrrrr,r�rrrr� 32 co ' 32 DRIVE-THRU DIRECTIONAL GRAPHICS 4. 3 33 33 DRIVE THRU ORDER POINT BOLLARD -4. o 34 H o 34 DRIVE THRU ORDER POINT ISLAND CURB C-4.3 a 35 x x 35 MENU BOARD LOOP DETECTION SYSTEM C-4. 36 N 36 ENTRY DOOR FROST SLAB DETAIL C_4_ ro N 37 GREASE TRAP v 38 TRANSFORMER Ea 3 39 ROOF DOWNSPOUT (TO CONNECT TO SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM) to N nx i 40 LANDSCAPED AREA 0 " TYPICAL LOCATION FOR OUTDOOR o " 41 TABLES.(SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE) o ko N Z O °D CONCRETE STRIP BETWEEN BUILDING a / 42 AND BACK OF CURB of oo o 6 0 43 CONCRETE PAD FOR OPTIONAL CASH STATION om =� o a� t y N E E_ �0 vx0' o,oE axEO Ld w� WEST 79TH STREET U Z m m a m PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY o BITUMINOUS SURFACE 0. V) J P tooF k7� ===,?Ph14°53'05" ---��\ R _w3R=70 .65' L="2.54' \ 24.9, - - _ II u II I� 4 I� I� II 7.0' DRAINAGE AND, UTILITY EASEMENT 10.0' BUILDING - SETBACK II I� I� I� I� II II II I� 4 �� II �� II 111 # Z N N 0) 4 CO w• m IN m 2 m rl&zzlllq mm Im a' + •� m Or L n 6A O _ r 'A / v / Co / d) / Ov I I I J 7.0' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT I 10.0' BUILDING OD SETBACK cyll PRO . LIGHT POLE TYP. (SEE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR DETAILS) I CD ® 20a N � ^ �o Oh Q Al Pi� 4,775 S.F. 120 SEATS INSIDE, 8 SE/ 5.0, 23 CAR STW (SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR EXACT BUILDING DI AND LAYOUT DETA PROP. ALUMINUM HANDRAIL 41 \ - J SIGN LEGEND - DENOTES "STOP" 6A Rl-1, 30" X 30" (TYP.) DENOTES "HANDICAPPED �pG PARKING" BLUE W/ WHITE LETTERIN 68 is (BOLLARD MOUNTED) �osisca R7-8P, 12" X 18" (TYP.) 6C DENOTES "DO NOT ENTER" R5-1, 30" X 30" (TYP.) Pedesldan 6D DENOTES "PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK" alT1 12" X 18" (TYP.) Crosswalk DENOTES 'VAN ACCESSIBLE" D9-6P 6E ® (BOLLARD MOUNTED WITH 6B) PROJECT NOTES: * ALL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN PUBLIC R.O.W./ EASEMENTS AND OR CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWERS AND STREETS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUBDIVISIONS. * AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN PUBLIC R.O.W./ EASEMENTS AND/OR ANY CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWERS AND STREETS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY TO OBTAIN APPLICABLE CITY PERMITS. * INGRESS/EGRESS WILL BE PROVIDED INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL TO THIS SITE. * ALL CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SHALL BE 24" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. * ALL PAVEMENT DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. * ALL PAVEMENT RADII ARE MEASURED TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. * ALL CURB ADJOINING SIDEWALKS SHALL BE DOWELED INTO THE CURB. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C-4.0 II I� I� PROP. VARIABLE HEIGHT SEGMENTAL BLOCK RETAININI,q WALL \\ a-° # \\\ 25 2 s 17D �� v N ��===--=O. 39 36.436+1 Q ri�i P2 7 / ® [FBI �3 36 37 25 . O \ s 40 OUTSIDE \ �� 6N 1+7A 'LANS --NSIONS S) 37 6K PROP. OUTDOOR SEATING AREA =1z�1 6TA/Jc< / 9•z `fir z 00, �,_ SIGN EASEMENT PER •: ,as:. i ..., iu _... - ,�c� .DOCUMENT 33184 L- - - - - 6D - 91 63.25' - - o Ft=262- 53'51" _ �10 r Ft=2627 . L= ➢ �i - - - - - - - N"6'9cD2r5rEY66.38'0 11 =1�22' ,r-- - 45 �,- -- _ -gym_ >� rn N68°03'01"E PROP. VARIABLE HEIGHT_,az --------'- �G _------ mm --------------�g�-- EGMENTAL BLOCK wul EXIST. SIDEWALK fin_ Wiz- z> _ RETAINING WALL --_-------- - --------------aN p0 S -==-ro � � � PROPOSED CHICK-FIL-A ----------------- 9m------ 0 MONUMENT SIGN - STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY BITUMINOUS SURFACE ':✓ "` ` 23 5D { w i a b, SITE DATA: * PARCEL 1 SIZE: 46,309E SQ. FT. (1.063 AC.) * PARCEL 2 SIZE: 11,279t SO. FT. (0.259 AC.) * LEASE PARCEL SIZE: 57,588t SQ. FT. (1.322 AC.) BUILDING AND LOT DATA: ('r''1 3rl,43Zm * BUILDING FOOT PRINT: 4,775E SQ. FT. -7 'fi, 403il." * PERCENT OF SITE COVERED BY BUILDING: 8.29% 5I),,&s`rq * PERCENT OF SITE COVERED BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 7'j.49% * PERCENT OF SITE COVERED BY PARKING AREA: 49.60% * PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: 21'-0" (1-STORY) C orf-. * PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE HEIGHT: 8'-8" %r 1611,E PARKING DATA: • NUMBER OF REGULAR PARKING STALLS: 70 • NUMBER OF ADA STALLS: 3 • TOTAL NUMBER OF STALLS PROVIDED: 73 • TOTAL NUMBER OF REQUIRED: 60 • TYPICAL PARKING WIDTH: 9.0' • TYPICAL PARKING LENGTH: 18.0' • TYPICAL ISLE WIDTH:fX�'0'Z411amr_ • EMPLOYEES DURING MAX. SHIFT: 15 • TOTAL SEATING: 128 (INDOOR: 120, OUTDOOR: 8) PARKING FORMULA: 1 SPACES PER 80 SQ. FT. OF BUILDING HATCH LEGEND 0 DENOTES STANDARD PAVEMENT SECTION 0 DENOTES CONCRETE SECTION DENOTES HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT SECTION DENOTES PROP. SIDEWALK DENOTES AREA OF DEPRESSED SIDEWALK DENOTES AREA OF DEPRESSED CURB AND 17C GUTTER WITH LENGTH NOTED ON PLANS. --7777771- DENOTES REVERSE CURB & GUTTER 17A 4 ORDER CANOPY LAYOUT DETAIL `2.0 SCALE: 1" =10' ALL LAYOUT DETAIL SCALE: 1" =10' Sheet C-2.0 hKHUllyh 6C UKHIIVHht LEGEND: 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF SITE PLAN DOCUMENTS AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FOR EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS,', _,,,,. DENOTES AREA OF DEPRESSED SIDEWALK - XXX.XX DENOTES SURFACE GRADE SPOT GREASE TRAP REQUIREMENTS/DETAILS, DOOR ACCESS, AND EXTERIOR GRADING. ELEVATIONS. THE UTILITY SERVICE SIZES ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ARCHITECT. THE DENOTES AREA OF DEPRESSED CURB WITH CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES/SERVICES WITH THE LENGTH NOTED ON PLANS. DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION INDIVIDUAL COMPANIES, TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ENSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ARROW. ACHIEVED. THE JURISDICTION UTILITY REQUIREMENTS SHALL ALSO BE MET, AS P7T7Tt - DENOTES AREA OF REVERSE (SPILLING) WELL AS COORDINATING THE UTILITY TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS PRIOR TO CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. DENOTES PROPOSED OVERFLOW DIRECTION ARROW. CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING UTILITY/SERVICE. WHERE CONFLICTS EXIST WITH THESE SITE PLANS, ENGINEER IS TO BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO �� DENOTES 10 INCH OPEN GRADED RESOLVE SAME. '` AGGREGATE LAYER 2. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. ALL EXCAVATED OR FILLED AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED AS OUTLINED _ IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. MOISTURE CONTENT AT TIME OF PLACEMENT -- SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED WITH THE STATE WHERE THE WORK IS II PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREAS WITHIN � - - - - - - - - - - - - THE BUILDING PAD AREA AND AREAS TO BE PAVED HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN10" OPEN GRADED ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE AGGREGATE LAYER AT THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. SUBBASE SAME ELEVATION AS THE MATERIAL FOR SIDEWALKS, CURB, OR ASPHALT SHALL BE FREE OF ORGANICS 1 AGGREGATE UNDER THE AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIALS. SHOULD SUBBASE BE DEEMED UNSUITABLE WEST 79TH STREET STORMTECH SYFpTp�, D D Fll BY OWNER OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, SUBBASE IS TO BE REMOVE AN FILLED WITH APPROVED FILL MATERIAL COMPACTED AS DIRECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.'ti 3. ALL FILL, COMPACTION, AND BACKFILL MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR UTILITY { INSTALLATION SHALL BE AS PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPLICABLE 0 i UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY TO THE FULLEST EXTENT WITH THE LATEST OSHA STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS, OR ANY OTHER AGENCY HAVINGJURISDICTION 4c? FOR EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING PROCEDURES. THE CONTRACTOR \ IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE "MEANS AND METHODS" REQUIRED TO -� MEET THE INTENT AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA OF OSHA, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER ENTITY THAT HAS JURISDICTION FOR EXCAVATION AND/OR TRENCHING PROCEDURES. Ij Ay0 5. PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAW CUT IN STRAIGHT LINES TO THE FULL DEPTH OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT. ALL DEBRIS FROM REMOVAL OPERATIONS SHALL BE REMOVED I� FROM THE SITE AT THE TIME OF EXCAVATION. STOCKPILING OF DEBRIS WILL NOTE BE PERMITTED. II 6. THE TOPS OF EXISTING MANHOLES, INLET STRUCTURES, AND SANITARY CLEANOUT �! TOPS SHALL BE ADJUSTED, IF REQUIRED, TO MATCH PROPOSED GRADES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS. II 7. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC II INFORMATION AND UTILITY INVERT ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY I� CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE 0.75% MINIMUM SLOPE ALONG ALL ISLANDS, GUTTERS, AND CURBS; 1.0% ON ALL CONCRETE SURFACES; AND 1.5% If MINIMUM ON ASPHALT, TO PREVENT PONDING. ANY DISCREPANCIES THAT MAY \ AFFECT THE PUBLIC SAFETY OR PROJECT COST MUST BE IDENTIFIED TO THE ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY. PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT NOTIFICATION IS DONE SO AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OWN RISK. 8. PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE GENERALLY 6" ABOVE EXISTING LOCAL \ ASPHALT GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FIELD ADJUST TO CREATE A MINIMUM OF 0.75% GUTTER GRADE ALONG CURB FACE. ENGINEER TO APPROVE FINAL 10�0 CURBING CUT SHEETS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS OR RELATIVE TO OTHER PLANS, THE II SITE PLAN WILL TAKE PRECEDENCE. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY CONFLICTS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS FOR ALL OFF -SITE MATERIAL SOURCES AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY A COPY OF APPROVALS TO ENGINEER AND OWNER PRIOR TO INITIATING WORK. 11. SITE GRADING SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. 12. SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND NOTES. 13. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TO REMAIN, FENCING, TREES, & ETC., WITHIN CONSTRUCTION AREA SHALL BE REMOVED & DISPOSED OF OFF SITE. NO ON SITE BURNING WILL BE ALLOWED 14. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRE -CAST. 15. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND STORM SEWER PIPES SHALL MEET HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC (H20) LOADING AND BE INSTALLED ACCORDINGLY. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES HAVING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ON SITE OR IN RIGHT-OF-WAY PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING COMPANY AND LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO GRADING START. 17. NO PART OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A FLOOD HAZARD AREA 18. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ® EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. 19. ALL CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SHALL BE TYPE B-6.18 CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 20. MATCH EXISTING GRADES AT PROPERTY LINES AND/OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. 21. BACKFILL TO THE TOP OF CURBS. 22. SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS 23. ALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 2%. 24. DESIGNATED HANDICAP PARKING AREAS SHALL BE GRADED TO A MAXIMUM OF 2% - 25. SLOPES IN PAVEMENT SHALL BE UNIFORM TO AVOID PONDING OF PAVEMENT. N a 26. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE HIS GRADING OPERATIONS TO WITHIN I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ANY DAMAGE TO x c PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THE SITE BOUNDARY SHALL BE AT THE SOLE M ° RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. v M 27.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY NECESSARY MOISTURE CONTROL TO THE Lo mo CONSTRUCTION AREA AND HAUL ROADS TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF DUST.do ja N s 28. ALL FIELD TILES ENCOUNTERED SHALL BE REPLACED AND/OR CONNECTED TO d THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM AND LOCATED AND IDENTIFIED ON THE RECORD ao PLANS BY THE CONTRACTOR. o " 29. ALL STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE r6 x o WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN In U �o n on a C-4 o m � 00 of m g TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES: ° n * ALL APPLICABLE CITY PERMITS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CLOSURE PERMITS, qN SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN CITY ROW OR LANE ° I CLOSURES. v o j * ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE c=i MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. I SIDEWALK CLOSED SIGNS REQUIRED FOR ALL SIDWALK CLOSURES. X N oo * THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED NEITHER TO OBSTRUCT NOR REMOVE ANY EXISTING FL x E 0 PAVEMENT, NOR TO DISTURB THE EXISTING TRAFFIC PATTERNS MORE THAN IS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK. PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY BITUMINOUS SURFACE /lb O' ------- ..... ...--=14;0 9 0511 R=70 .65' L=482.54' rI �I ��i /iris � � `,�� -��IK!" / - re / �'o .� // / - /r `I GENERAL NOTES: * ACCESSIBLE PARKING, RAMPS, AND SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH ADA ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES. * ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA CODES AND STANDARDS, NOTHING INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLYING WITH ANY APPROPRIATE SAFETY REGULATIONS. * 1 WEEK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WITHIN CITY ROW OR ANY CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWERS, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE CITY ENGINEERING DIVISIONS: * CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY BUILDING DIMENSIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLACE 3/4 INCH EXPANSION JOINT BETWEEN ALL P.C.C. PAVEMENT/ SIDEWALKS AND BUILDING. PLACE 1/2 INCH EXPANSION JOINT BETWEEN SIDEWALKS AND P.C.C. PAVEMENT. CUT/TRIM EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE FLUSH WITH SURFACE. * ALL PROPERTY PINS SHALL BF PROTECTED FROM GRADING OR OTHER OPERATIONS. ANY PINS DISTURBED SHALL BE RESET AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. * DO NOT STORE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. * THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB DESIRABLE GRASS AREAS AND DESIRABLE TREES OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO PARK OR SERVICE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT OR USE THESE AREAS FOR STORAGE OR MATERIALS. STORAGE, PARKING AND SERVICE AREAS WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER. * THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY AREAS OF PAVEMENT OR SIDEWALK NOT TO BE REMOVED THAT IS DAMAGED DUE TO OPERATING EQUIPMENT ON THE PAVEMENT OR SIDEWALK. * THE CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED TO PLACE TEMPORARY WARNING DEVICES AND SAFETY FENCE AT CERTAIN LOCATIONS WHERE REPLACEMENT FEATURES ARE NOT INSTALLED THE SAME DAY, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR THE CITY. * ALL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS AND/OR ANY CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWERS AND STREETS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUBDIVISIONS AND LATEST EDITION OF MNDOT DESIGN STANDARDS TRASH ENCLOSURE GRADING DETAIL SCALE: 1" =10' •3e PROP. VARIABLE HEIGHT 1/ I SEGMENTAL BLOCK ? �� ^O_,_� I. RETAINING WALL � V gsogy°yp L 5g o �V Jn 60 � \ 8 s , 1 r94 v6 i9� p°.�`I` _Llr�0 ::I�ST„�o '- ST-31 y 95 G t-w�ho 46 / I S, v Lg g�Irn ST-37 i ST-21 I \ g �O 9 , ® ST-38 / ST-22 i 4 0 ® 5 g. o rn Ir 4,775 S.F. ISp�b`- ,-��` r►q:�. '08,_SO G 4e ST-19 ST-10 kg. k� y00p� g 5° m °'o,� �'o,� � ST-9 • •, ,`t��= � Oro ST-6 opp ST-8Abb :o . =947- ST-7 947 ST-3 _ _ _ _ ._ - ST-31 •---- -- 7 PROP 8 SQ. YDS. PROP. VARIABLE OF RIP RP -- -HEIGHT SEGMENTAL" --- ST-5 BLOCK RETAINING ST-4 WALL.. _. ... ST-2 -32 120 SEATS INSIDE, 8 SEAS OUTSIDE FIN. FLR. = 951.10 (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS s� FOR EXACT BUILDING DI ENSIONS o 'ENTRY AND LAYOUT DI S) g50 $ Eei 11 PROP. OUTDOOR TOWER SEATING AREA i�� --` t 0 t• We -0�h� � gy �GQ � A:; r40� pj�e � gpg• �\\ oc1r� I G g9oj0•. , 9 950.. ( . 94g s 6 jC ,. FP ! � / i ST-16 i ! 950 - ST-15 mho _ 1 99 =$ 0 � _ R=2627 911 � . 3 ST-41 4 ! i .22rJ' 37A! a / 53 14 94D It XIST. SIDEWALK �- �y�------- -40 9g9S�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ..� s� STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY BITUMINOUS SURFACE sr-# STORM TAGS ST-1 EXIST. STM CB ST-23 NYLOPLAST 30" STRUCTURE W/ H-20 SOLID GR RIM = 947.76 INV = 943.76 W 18" RIM = 950.00 INV = 945.90 NE, SE (STORMTECH) INV = 943.66 S 24" INV = 944.21 N 15" INV = 945.90 SW 15" INV = 944.31 E 12" ST-24 29 LIN FT SS ADS N-12 WT, 15" ST-2 29 LIN FT EXIST. SS RCP, 15'* ® 0.69% 0 5.34% ST-25 STM SWR CB 2' DIA R-2504 TY D GRATE ST-3 EXIST. FES, 15" RIM = 949.10 INV = 945.76 INV = 946.10 NE 15" ST-4 STM SWR MH 5' DIA.. R-1713 CL ST-26 NYLOPLAST 30" DIA. DRAIN BASIN, 2X2 STANDARD CURB (CONSTRUCT ONLINE OF EXIST. 15" RCP) T/C = 950.16 INV = 945.90 NW, SE (STORMTECH) RIM = 948.70 INV = 944.80 N 15" (EXIST.) INV = 944.48 S 15" (EXIST.) ST-27 NYLOPLAST 30" STRUCTURE W/ H-20 SOLID GR INV = 944.48 NE 15" RIM = 950.35 INV = 945.90 NW, SW (STORMTECH) ST-5 51 LIN FT SS RCP, 15" INV = 945.90 SE 12" 0 1.20% ST-28 60 LIN FT SS ADS N-12 WT, 12" ST-6 FES RCP, 15" W/ GRATE 0 1.75% INV = 945.09 ST-29 STM SWR CB 4' DIA R-3235 TY A GRATE ST-7 FES RCP, 21" W/ GRATE T/C = 950.36 INV = 945.50 INV = 946.95 NW 12" INV = 946.95 SE B" ST-8 21 LIN FT SS RCP, 21" 0 1.05% ST-30 13 LIN FT SS PVC SDR 26, 8" (ROOF DRAIN) 0 2.00% ST-9 STM SWR MH 5' DIA., R-1713 CL INV 0 W WYE = 947.05 (RESTRICTOR STRUCTURE. SEE DETAIL INV ® E WYE = 947.15 FOR WEIR DIMENSIONS) INV 0 BLDG = 947.21 (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT/PLANS) RIM = 949.85 1.75' WIDE WEIR INV = 945.87 INV = 945.72 N 21" ST-31 CLEANOUT (SEE DETAIL) INV = 945.72 SW 21" RIM = 950.76 INV = 947.17 ST-10 8 LIN FT SS ADS N-12 WT, 21" 0 1.03% ST-32 57 LIN FT SS PVC SDR 26, 8" (ROOF DRAIN) 0 1.00% ST-11 NYLOPLAST 30" STRUCTURE W/ H-20 SOLID GR RIM = 950.15 ST-33 CLEANOUT (SEE DETAIL) INV = 945.80 NE, NW, SW (STORMTECH) RIM = 950.95 INV = 945.80 S 21" INV = 947.62 ST-12 NYLOPLAST 30" STRUCTURE W/ H-20 SOLID GR ST-34 6 LIN FT SS PVC SDR 26, 8" (ROOF DRAIN) RIM = 950.45 0 2.00% INV = 945.90 NW (STORMTECH) INV 0 ST-32 = 947.32 INV = 945.90 E 12" INV 0 BLDG = 947.44 (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT/PLANS) ST-13 57 LIN FT SS ADS N-12 WT, 12" 0 0.35% ST-35 6 LIN FT SS PVC SDR 26, 8" (ROOF DRAIN) 0 2.00% ST-14 STM SWR CB 4' DIA R-3235 TY A GRATE INV 0 ST-32 = 947.58 T/C = 949.46 INV 0 BLDG = 947.70 INV = 946.10 W 12" (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT/PLANS) INV = 946.10 NE 12" ST-36 23 LIN FT SS PVC SDR 26, 8" (ROOF DRAIN) ST-15 85 LIN FT SS RCP, 12" ® 1.00% 0 0.35% ST-37 CLEANOUT (SEE DETAIL) ST-16 STM SWR CB 2' DIA R-3235 TY A GRATE RIM = 951.05 T/C = 949.81 INV = 947.38 INV = 946.40 SW 12" ST-38 2 LIN FT SS PVC SDR 26, B" (ROOF DRAIN) ST-17 NYLOPLAST 30" STRUCTURE W/ H-20 SOLID GR ® 2.00% RIM = 950.00 INV 0 ST-36 = 947.36 INV = 945.90 NW, SE (STORMTECH) INV ® BLDG = 947.40 INV = 945.90 SW 12" (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT/PLANS) ST-18 29 LIN FT SS ADS N-12 WT, 12" ST-39 FES, 12" 0 0.34% INV = 947.50 ST-19 STM SWR CB 2' DIA R-3235 TY A GRATE ST-40 25 LIN FT SS CMP, 12" T/C = 948.91 0 2.00% INV = 946.00 NE 12" ST-41 FES, 12" ST-20 NYLOPLAST 30" STRUCTURE W/ H-20 SOLID GR INV = 948.00 RIM = 950.05 INV = 945.90 NW, SE (STORMTECH) INV = 945.90 SW 12" ST-21 29 LIN FT SS ADS N-12 WT. 12" 0 0.34% ST-22 STM SWR CB 2' DIA R-2504 TY D GRATE RIM = 948.50 INV = 946.00 NE 12" _- STORMWATER NOTES: * THE STORMTECH SYSTEM WILL CONSIST OF 130 SC310 CHAMBERS. * THE STORMTECH SYSTEM WILL HAVE 10 INCHES OF OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE UNDER THE CHAMBERS AND 6 INCHES ABOVE THE CHAMBERS. * IT IS ASSUMED THAT ABOVE THE TOP LAYER OF OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE WILL BE BACKFILLED WITH MNDOT AGGREGATE BASE COURSE. * THE OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE WILL BE ENVELOPED WITH AN AASHTO M288 CLASS 2 NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE. * IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED INFILTRATION DRAW DOWN TIME, THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL 8 INCH THICK AGGREGATE LAYER THAT EXTENDS TO THE WEST AND NORTH OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM AS NOTED ON THE GRADING PLAN. THE ADDITIONAL 10" AGGREGATE BASE WILL BE ENVELOPED WITH THE SAME NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE AS IN THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. * IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE AREA ABOVE THE ADDITIONAL OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE BASE WILL BE BACKFILLED WITH MNDOT AGGREGATE BASE COURSE. * RUNOFF AND STORAGE CALCULATIONS: 10-YEAR = 6.08 CFS, 6,411 CF (HWL = 946.91) 100-YEAR = 12.13 CFS, 7,154 CF (HWL = 947.52 0 5® Sheet c - 3. O 3 `o 0 a i 0 0 m m o+ ! z a J a 0 0 o � J � w z al C s V) < w m a O 0 0 �y J o� 3 a � 3 T � 0 FL V) j C x � o � w � M co co0 0 m o 3 m C / c U rn / OD N O O 00 / x MI o I In U m � M om N O m � n czI ` 3 m a � / O �p O «I / p M C a FL s .y N Eo o0 / E_ �U O .. v x h C w O E o m E o ax-U NOTES: This plan has been prepared to comply with the provisions of the NPDES Permit Construction Stormwater Permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for Discharges from Construction Site Activities. 1. Site Description. a. The following is a description of the construction activity which is the subject of this plan: CHICK-FIL-A CHANHASSEN, MN. The proposed development consists of construction of a parking lot and restaurant. The construction activities for site improvements will include: site clearing, demolition, grubbing, mass, grading, pavement construction, installation of utilities including storm sewers, soil erosion and sedimentation control measures, as a minimum. b. The following is a description of the intended sequence of major activities which will disturb soils for major portions of the construction site such as grubbing, excavation, and grading: The sequence of the construction activities may be as follows: 1) install silt filter fence and stabilized construction entrance, 2) site clearing, demolition of existing parking lot, building and grubbing. 3) mass grading. 4) underground utilities installation. 5) fine grading in pavement area, and 6) pavement construction. The soil erosion and sedimentation control items will be constructed as needed during the above construction activities. c. The total area of the construction site is estimated to be 1.36 acres. The total area of the site that is estimated to be disturbed by excavation, grading, or other activities, is 1.36 acres. d. The estimated runoff coefficients of the various areas of the site after construction activities are completed area contained in the project drainage study, titled FINAL ENGINEERING DRAINAGE REPORT for CHICK-FIL-A CHANHASSEN, MN. with (latest revision date) prepared by HR GREEN, INC. which is hereby incorporated by reference in this plan. Information describing the soils at the site is contained in the Geotechnical Report for the project, which is hereby incorporated by reference, or in an attachment to this plan. 2. Controls. This section of the plan addresses the various controls that will be implemented for each of the major construction activities described in 1.b above. For each measure discussed, the contractors will be responsible for its implementation as indicated. Each such contractor has signed the required certification on forms which are attached to, and are a part of, this plan. a. Erosion and Sediment Controls. (i) STABILIZATION PRACTICES. Provided below is a description of interim and permanent stabilization practices, including site -specific scheduling of the implementation of the practices. Site plans will ensure that existing vegetation is preserved where attainable and disturbed portions of the site will be stabilized. Except as provided in 2.a. (i) (A) and 2.1b. stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable in portions of the site where construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the construction activity in that portions of the site where construction activity will not occur for a period of 21 or more calendar days. (A) Where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity temporarily or permanently ceases is precluded by snow cover, stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable thereafter. The following interim and permanent stabilization practices, as a minimum will be implemented to stabilize the disturbed area of the site: 1. Permanent seeding/sod 2. Inlet protection 3. Barrier filter 4. Stabilized construction entrance (ii) STRUCTURAL PRACTICES. Provided below is a description of structural practices that will be implemented, to the degree attainable, to divert flows from exposed soils, store flows or otherwise limit runoff and the discharge of pollutants from exposed areas of the site. The installation of these devices may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. 1. Storm sewer system 2. Permanent seeding 3. Inlet protection b. Stormwater Management. (i) Provided below is a description of measures that will be installed during the construction process to control pollutants in stormwater discharges that will occur after construction operations have been completed. The installation of these devices may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The practices selected for implantation were determined on the basis of the technical guidance contained in DNR's Standard Specifications for Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control, and other ordinances listed in the Specifications. The stormwater pollutant control measures shall include: 1. Silt filter fence 2. inlet protection Filter 3. Storm sewers 2. Other Controls. (i) Waste Disposal. The solid waste materials including trash, construction debris, excess construction materials, machinery, tools and other items will be collected and disposed off -site by the contractor. The contractor is responsible to acquire any permit required for such disposal. Burning on the site will not be permitted. No solid materials, including building materials, shall be discharged into Waters of the State, except as authorized by a Section 404 permit. (ii) The provisions of this plan shall ensure and demonstrate compliance with applicable State and/or local waste disposal, sanitary sewer or septic system regulations. PROP. SILT FILTER FENCE (TYP.) I WEST 79TH STREET PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY - BITUMINOUS SURFACE ?a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PROP. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL) f PROP. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA (SEE DETAIL) LEGEND: EROSION CONTROL NOTES: s DENOTES AREA OF DEPRESSED SIDEWALK 1. INSTALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE DENOTES AREA OF DEPRESSED CURB WITH 2. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE T- LENGTH NOTED ON PLANS. 3. DEMOLITION OF EXISTING PARKING LOT AND BUILDING --T77777--- DENOTES AREA OF REVERSE (SPILLING) 4. TREE REMOVAL AND TRANSPLANTING, WHERE NECESSARY CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. 5. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL, STABILIZE STOCKPILES WITHIN DENOTES AREA TO UTILIZE RIP -RAP AND 14 DAYS. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE 6. CONTINUE GRADING, STABILIZE COMPLETED AREAS WITH DETAILS). PERMANENT STABILIZATION OR INACTIVE AREAS (INCLUDING �- DENOTES PERIMETER EROSION BARRIER (SILT MASS GRADED LOTS) WITH TEMPORARY STABILIZATION WITHIN Vf FENCE), INLET & PIPE PROTECTION AND DITCH 14 DAYS. CHECK 7. INSTALL UTILITIES, STORM SEWER, CURB AND GUTTER, WITH ~ DENOTES PROPOSED OVERFLOW DIRECTION INLET AND OUTLET PROTECTION. ARROW. 8. APPLY STONE TO PARKING AREA 9. 10. CONSTRUCT BUILDINGS COMPLETEGRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 11. PLANTINGS. COMPLETE FINAL PAVING. 1. SITE GRADING SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. 12. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE 2. UTILIZE EXCELSIOR BLANKET ON ALL SLOPES OF 5:1 OR SITE IS STABILIZED, RESEED ANY REMAINING DISTURBED GREATER. AREAS. 3. ALL STREETS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE KEPT CLEAN AT ALL 13. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ONCE TIMES. VEGETATION REACHES 70% COVERAGE. 4. IF ANY ADDITIONAL SOIL EROSION MEASURES ARE DEEMED 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL PROVISIONS AND NECESSARY BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. REQUIREMENTS OF NOTED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION THESE MEASURES MUST BE IMMEDIATELY IMPLEMENTED BY PREVENTION PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT THE CONTRACTOR. 15. ANTICIPATED PROJECT START DATE IS 7/1/16 AND THE 5. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS TRANSFERRED INTO THE ROW OR ADJOINING ANTICIPATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE IS 2/1/17. PROPERTY AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. < (SEE ARCHITECTURAL .,:. pp PLANS 9• t� \ FOR EXACT BUILDING DI ENSIONS AND LAYOUT DETAI S) { �` ENTRY PROP. OUTDOOR .. r ------ -- TOWER SEATING AREA z a Y k - . -.,, ... .... .. .. ...... :- / \.. .,��,,;. . -•' ant .- \ " Pi GP SILT I T Ei/-.7 - / "FENCE (TYP.) �� 9 .........__............. i♦ / / / ,�, 8 . _.......... t - j PROP. INLET -94 -- - PROTECTION -- �------ (SE�..D€7Ait - 948 - _ 949 - - - - / - - --- EXIST. SIDEWALK _� �- PROP. 8 SQ. YDS. - ----------- �.� OF RIP -RP _.--- --------- - PROP. SILT FILTER- _ FENCE (TYP.) -�. STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY BITUMINOUS SURFACE 0 5 10 20 Sheet C-3. UTILITY NOTES 1. REFER TO MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PLANS FOR DUTY SERVICE SIZES AND EXACT LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM SIZES OF ALL SERVICES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE SERVICE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. REFER TO MECHANICAL PLANS FOR GAS SERVICE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. _ 2. FIELD VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS OF ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING =G - G G G G G G- G _ UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. 3. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SUPPORT FOR EXISTING UTILITY LINES THAT ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL BACKFILLING IS COMPLETE. \ _ --r- _ -� - - - - - - APPROX. LOCATION \ = 4. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7.5' COVER OVER ALL WATER MAINS. r OF EXIST. GAS MAIN 5. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7.0' COVER OVER ALL SANITARY SEWER. Ia Z� W EXIST. 10" PIP 6. ADJUST ALL MANHOLES AND FRAMES TO FINISHED GRADES. W- HJ,o Y Na N W 14 24 15 WATER MAIN 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN W-� Q z �- w EXIST. 10" PVC w ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLUMBING CODE. W�� mm a �_ SANITARY SEWER MAIN WEST 79TH STREET 28 w S. 12" MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWER �� -0 tn Q PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY W S-1 PIPES. 18" MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN SANITARY/STORM SEWER AND �� N o I= WATER MAIN. -�� o :D BITUMINOUS SURFACE 9. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 10' HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SANITARY SEWER LINES AND PUBLIC WATER MAINS. ___-- �� pys-U�_�{�=1405305n 4 10. WHERE PUBLIC UTILITY FIXTURES ARE SHOWN AS EXISTING ON THE PLANS OR T U�T T �UT UT ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA, IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY UT U Ur OF THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE OWNERS OF THOSE UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE i� �o-P BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AFFORD ACCESS TO THESE FACILITIES FOR NECESSARY MODIFICATION OF SERVICES. UNDERGROUND II I FACILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM AVAILABLE - - - _- SURVEYS AND RECORDS AND THEREFORE, THEIR LOCATIONS MUST BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT IS POSSIBLE THERE MAY BE OTHERS. THE EXISTENCE OF II ° 12 I 19 7 I WHICH IS PRESENTLY NOT KNOWN OR SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS S-3 RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THEIR EXISTENCE AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND TO AVOID DAMAGE THERETO. NO CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE II I 25 o c ALLOWED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR ANY INTERFERENCE OR DELAY CAUSED BY III I rn~ SUCH WORK. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO UTILIZE THE UTILITY CALL GOPHER II WW STATE ONE CALL AT 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING ANYWHERE ON THE PROJECT. 7.0'II I PROP. TRASH UTI 11. LOCATION OF SITE UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH PROPER UTILITY DRAINAGE AND ENCLOSURE AIM/ t c UTILITY EASEMENT ~ COMPANY PROVIDING SERVICE. I f p�j 12. ALL WATER AND SANITARY LEADS TO BUILDING SHALL END 5' OUTSIDE THE 10 .0' BUILDING BUILDING LIMITS AS SHOWN ON PLAN AND SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A SETBACK / TEMPORARY PLUG AT END. II I / i 13. SEE SITE SPECIFICATIONS "UNDERGROUND UTILITIES" FOR BACKFILLING AND li I �' 21 COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. ` 15 1 14. GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TAP AND TIE ON I I FEES REQUIRED, AS WELL AS COST OF UNDERGROUND SERVICE PROP. LIGHT POLE TYP. CONNECTIONS TO THE BUILDING. �I I (SEE PHOTOMETRIC I 15. ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER SHALL BE RUN II I PLANS FOR DETAILS) UNDERGROUND, FROM ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO TRANSFORMER LOCATION. I 7.0' DRAINAGE AND. ASSOCIATED COST BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. ij I UTILITY EASEMENT 16. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. II 17. FOR EXACT LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS SEE PHOTOMETRICS PLAN 18. MATERIAL PERMITTED FOR USE AS SANITARY SEWER PIPES IS PVC SDR 26 II I 1 I 10 SETBACKING, FOR 6" & 4".- 19. EXCEL ENERGY GAS WILL FURNISH AND INSTALL THE GAS MAINS AND GAS �\ _ I I I 5 ap SERVICE UP TO AND INCLUDING THE METER. IF PAVING IS COMPLETE PRIOR i TO GAS SERVICE INSTALLATION, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE (1) 4" SCHEDULE I - 40 PVC CONDUIT UNDER PAVED AREAS. 20. CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL (2) 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUITS EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT I I I ® w FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE FROM CENTURYLINK MAIN TO BUILDING. CENTURYLINK TO SUPPLY, PROVIDE AND INSTALL PRIMARY TELEPHONE SERVICE. Q ® _� 21. CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL (2) 4" SCHEDULE 80 OR BETTER, UAW GRAY, PVC CONDUITS WITH LONG ELBOW SWEEPS, AND A PULL WIRE, ARE ------ S- p 4 � ONLY REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR (V HORIZONTAL SEPARATION, 36" DEPTH) FROM THE TRANSFORMER PAD SITE TO GREEN I I ``"' - j fo- p" SPACE IF PAVEMENT/CONCRETE IS TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE ELECTRIC I -� COMPANY INSTALLING THEIR FACILITIES. CONDUITS MUST BE APPROVED BY I I I r EXCEL ENERGY PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. EXCEL ENERGY TO PROVIDE AND -� INSTALL PRIMARY ELECTRIC SERVICE. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL 29 21 TRANSFORMER PAD AND SECONDARY SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXCEL I I' 30_ \ ENEGRY SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. i I I 32 W W 31 ^u 22. ALL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF PROPOSED FIRE - \ THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN. i HYDRANT I I uj, 27 18 15 s - 23. ALL CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE CORE DRILLED. a LAYOUT NOTES y C PAY CONNECTION FEES FOR 6" DOMESTIC'/FIRE WATER SERVICE AND METER. 2.0" .o ❑1 DOMESTIC SERVICE TO SPLIT EXTERNAL OF BUILDING. 1.5" IRRIGATION LINE TO HAVE SEPARATE METER LOCATION ADJACENT TO DOMESTIC ° WATER METER INTERIOR TO THE BUILDING 2 �3 3/4" CW TO DUMPSTER POST HYDRANT a 0 6" WASTEWATER SERVICE LATERAL CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING ®INSTALL SERVICE PRIOR TO TRENCHING AND MAKE CONNECTION. o �5 6" SDR 26 WASTEWATER SERVICE LINE AT 1.04% (MIN.) SLOPE. ° 6" CLEAN OUT (SEE DETAIL). CLEANOUT SHALL BE FLUSH w/ GRADE OR © PAVEMENT & INSTALLED UNDER A PROTECTIVE METAL BOX COVER SIMILAR TO A METER PIT COVER WITH A TRAFFIC BEARING LID. or PRECAST 1000 GAL. CAPACITY GREASE TRAP. PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO o COORDINATE WITH BUILDING CONTRACTOR. TOP OF MANHOLE TO BE 0.2' ABOVE o FINISH GRADE AND MATCH SIDEWALK GRADES WHERE REQUIRED.VERIFY GREASE TRAP MEETS CITY/COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. REFER TO a PLUMBING PLAN. SHEET P-1.1. w TI ©6" KITCHEN WASTE LINE (SEE SANITARY TAGS FOR INFO.) a m I � a ❑g 3" VENT LINE. CONNECT TO GREASE INTERCEPTOR. (SEE SHEET P1.1 FOR DETAILS) a° ° w 10 6" RESTROOM WASTE LINE (SEE SANITARY TAGS FOR INFO.) O I° 0 0 6" OR 4" TWO-WAY CLEAN OUT (REFER TO PLUMBING PLANS)(SEE DETAIL o 11 37/C4.3) 3 - v DUMPSTER POST HYDRANT REFER TO THE FIXTURE CONNECTION SCHEDULE 'n o 12 (P-31) DEPICTED ON THE PROJECT PLUMBING PLANS j Ti 13 DOWNSPOUT FOR ROOF DRAINAGE (REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) 14 EXISTING 10" DIP WATER MAIN j 15 PROPOSED GAS SERVICE (SEE NOTE 19) Ln o 16 COORDINATE GAS METER INSTALLATION WITH GAS COMPANY. m 17 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVE (REFER TO IRRIGATION PLANS) 3 a C o7 18 6" PVC DR 35 ROOF DRAIN PIPE SYSTEM) (CONNECT TO SITE STORM DRAIN) Eo U 0 19 UNDERGROUND PRIMARY ELECTRIC SERVICE. (SEE NOTE 21) 20 PROPOSED PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER PER ELECTRIC COMPANY STANDARDS. r') SEE SERVICE UTILITY NOTES, THIS SHEET. a / 21 UNDERGROUND PRIMARY TELEPHONE SERVICE. (SEE NOTE 20) In to N o0 22 UNDERGROUND SECONDARY ELECTRIC SERVICE TO BUILDING. (SEE NOTE 21) o 23 INSTALL TRANSFORMER PAD (SEE NOTE 21) 3 0 24 CFA SERVICE, CONNECT TO EX. WATER LINE - 10" X 8" TAPPING SLEEVE o o PRESSURE CONNECTION, VALVE & VALVE BOX. 25 8" CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE FIRE 194 LIN. FT. a 00 26 2" DOMESTIC COPPER TYPE K W/ CORP. STOP W/ 2" VALVE & B-BOX xe o t rn 27 6" CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE FIRE SERVICE TO BUILDING `o L) j 28 EXISTING 10" PVC SANITARY SEWER MAIN E_ ; 29 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WITH AUXILIARY VAVLE m x " 30 8"X6"X8" TEE y w o E 31 6" CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE TO FIRE HYDRANT FL x` E co) 32 g"X6" REDUCER _. I � c n ou I ♦ 0C R 1 DRIVE-THRU WINDOW ESE �rIA tr}i � SANITARY SEWER TAGS S-1 388 LIN FT EXIST. SAN SWR MAIN, 10" PVC S_g GREASE TRAP (1,000 GAL.) 0 0.28% SEE BUILDING PLUMBING PLAN FOR DETAILS RIM(S) = 951.00 N, 951.00 S S-2 EXIST. SAN SWR MH INV = 946.05 (INLET) RIM = Q50-Q9 G G� / �O 0p. 1 SIGN EASEMENT S S ENT PER DOCUMENT NQ. 33184 ----- --- - - _ `Z627 R" R _ - . , AJA =2627.9" F 0,FO--�oFO _ FO_- _ z- -0- 22'_ �-----mom- _,-�� o n ZH FO FO - - - �� m Dc _ �m ----FO -- F� _ _.w -- EXIST. SIDEWALK z G- -----------=-3. z -0(D_-_-- ziz QN----------- pOZ p --'---------------------4� -----_--I�-_�- •---_- 0� ---- -_ UJ U3 aw 0 i� Lf) A ENTRY TOWER 4,775 S.F. 120 SEATS INSIDE, 8 SEA S OUTSIDE E FIN. FLR. = XX .XX (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT DETAI S) PROP. ALUMINUM PROP. OUTDOOR HANDRAIL SEATING AREA STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY BITUMINOUS SURFACE LEGEND: DENOTES VERTICAL SEPARATION PER MNR'SREQUIREMENTS 7 ��iiiii iii+�s�• � 1\ �I �I =U 0 C\\ 1 I Cy .0- S e ONSITE WATERLINE NOTES: * THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL BENDS, TEES, AND FIRE HYDRANTS. * ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN APPROVED AUXILIARY GATE VALVE. * ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AND DISINFECTED BEFORE ACCEPTANCE. SEE SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. * ALL TRENCHING, PIPE LAYING, AND BACKFILLING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL OSHA REGULATIONS. * GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE APPROVAL OF ALL GOVERNING AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THIS SYSTEM PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. \ VALVE AN VALVE BO 2" DO S 0 CONFLICT TAGS OMITTED FOR THIS SUBMITTAL (11 UTILITY LAYOUT BLOW-UP DETAIL s-1.o SCALE: 1" =10' �I d 0 ° al •d O NI N a 0 ° 0 In C 0 .Q1. 3 �I 0 0 aI 0 NI -N° v `o N 0 iu 3 0 �I ° al a 0 NI ° c ° V) 0 ° m 3 00 �I d rn ° al a 0 NI v `o a 0 ° 3 0 I N t` N L V a E a L e v rn m o dv r N 'o 0 O o ° a� U � L r0• J iE r; o ; m-9 T 0 0 N I I M r� 30 I N N �Ir N ao 0 0/1 E In 0 0 o 3 0 0 1 U L) 0 10 U M O N 00 oto o,m to �;`_% °� o �oP° omV j 0 �pM_ c axx�r .•N *' E oCy oU p/ E�mC m �Q o x 0 d ° o axE0 PAINT SOLID 1 DIRECTIONAL ARROW NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 2 DRIVE-THRU GRAPHICS 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO Gy O NOT TO SCALE CHICK-FIL-A PARKING LOT STRIPING rj SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL Qq,O NOTES: 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO REFLECTIVE PAINT ON ASPHALT & YELLOW CHICK-FIL-A PARKING LOT STRIPING REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE. SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL C4.0 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE STOP REFLECTIVE PAINT ON ASPHALT & YELLOW BAR REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE. iV 14 try ��\��\V1SI)Y 8" DIAM. I LENGTH VARIES 4 PAINT FULL LANE WIDTH 4 \ 0 4" PAINTED LINE (TYP.) T-2^ CENTER'STOP" IN DRIVE LANE •�iG+"46\�� 4- c 14"R PAIN ED 3 STOP LINE GRAPHIC 4 ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL NOT TO SCALE C 4.0 NOT TO SCALE NOTES: NOTES: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO CHICK-FIL-A 5 CHICK-FIL-A PARKING LOT STRIPING 5 PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL C-0.0 SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL G4,0 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT ON 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE ASPHALT & YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE, REFLECTIVE PAINT ON ASPHALT & YELLOW UNLESS UPON VERIFICATION BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE. IT IS DETERMINED THAT LOCAL, STATE, OR ADA CODES 3. IF STOP SIGN IS PROPOSED, STOP LINE DIFFER, IN WHICH CASE THESE CODES SHALL GOVERN. GRAPHIC IS NOT R3EQUIRED. 2%CR OPE NOTE: 4"THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION 1:20 -� INSTALL I* TOOLED RADIUS ON ALL MAX, RAMP EXPOSED EDGES SIMILAR AS MINIMUM 1% SLOPE (BEYOND) SHOWN ON CURB DETAIL AWAY FROM BUILDING. 2%SLOPE IN RETAINING CURB(BEYOND)MAXIMUM ALL DIRECTIONS AT CURB LANDING. CONCRETE CONCRETE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT @. J y� Cc� 9 6• k SUBGRADE COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED IN GEOTECHNICAL REPORT �s�ssa 4"AGGREGATE c`yioa0x` BASE COURSE SECTION A -A u . 4• y TRUNCATED DOMES v' ��I111i, _Y IF REQUIRED) O�G1T\N .�$,04 ��S LIGH M FINISH S ENS 24"CONCRETE \ P' CURB &GUTTER \� BOTH RAMP CURBS TO BE IF CHANGE IN DIREC R IF PAINTED YELLOW, SEE PARKING 5 RAMP EX30 FEET , nT erc�oiur. eccnrlcennN r� n �M7k CIVIL TO VERIFY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS AND MODIFY LAYOUT TO MATCH SITE AWNING 9' V 60° PARKING 90° PARKING NOTES: PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS: 1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE AISLES SHALL NOT STANDARDS: EXCEED 1:50 IN SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. IF ONLY ONE ACCESS 1 ALWAYS FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY'S STANDARDS. ISLE IS INSTALLED, IT IS TO BE A VAN SIZE. 2. SURFACES SHOULD BE CLEAN, DRY, AND FREE FROM LOOSE OR PEELING 2. PARKING STALL DIMENSIONING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PAINT. REMOVE ALL OIL, DUST, GREASE, DIRT, AND OTHER FOREIGN £ APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY'S AND ADA STANDARDS AND MATERIAL TO ENSURE ADEQUATE ADHESION. DO NOT APPLY WHEN AIR OR IF DIFFERENT THAN THIS DETAIL SHALL BE THE DIMENSIONING SURFACE TEMPERATURES ARE BELOW 40°F. SHOWN ON THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN. 3. APPLY SHERWIN-WILLIAMS SETFAST PREMIUM ALKYD ZONE MARKING PAINT A300 WHITE OR A303 YELLOW USING EITHER AIRLESS OR CONVENTIONAL LINE 3. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO CHICK-FIL-A PARKING STRIPING EQUIPMENT. USE THE FOLLOWING SETTINGS AS A GUIDE -ACTUAL I LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS. SETTINGS DEPEND ON ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION: 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 4' WIDE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT FOR AIRLESS STRIPING ON ASPHALT PARKING LOTS. . PRESSURE 18DO-2700 PSI 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 4" WIDE YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT FOR • TIP • HOSE 0..001B"15"-0- .017' STRIPING ON CONCRETE PARKING LOTS. . FILTER 60 MESH 6. NO WHEEL STOPS TO BE INSTALLED WHEN PARKING IS ADJACENT • REDUCTION ONLY IF NECESSARY, UP TO 1PTlGAL TO SIDEWALK. VM&P NAPTHA R1 K3 7. ADA SIGNS IN BOLLARDS AND BOLLARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED CONVENTIONAL WHEN PARKING IS ADJACENT TO FLUSH CURB OR A RAMP. • GUN BLINKS 21 (BLEEDER) OR EQUIVALENT . FLUID NOZZLE #68 . AIR NOZZLE INTERNAL MIX, #709 . ATOMIZATION PRESSURE 45-80 PSI . FLUID PRESSURE 40-70 PSI . REDUCTION ONLY IF NECESSARY, UP TO 1PT/GAL VM&P NAPTHA RI K3 MIX PAINT THOROUGHLY BY BOXING, STIRRING, OR POWER AGITATION BEFORE USE. APPLY AT 15 MILS WET TO ACHIEVE A SPREAD RATE OF 400500 LINEAL FEET OF STANDARD 4' STRIPE PER GALLON. APPLIED AT THIS RATE AT 70 DEGREES F AND 50% RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PAINT WILL DRY WITH NO TRAFFIC PICKUP AFTER 20 MINUTES. • GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO RE -STRIPE THE LOT 45 DAYS AFTER OPENING. CM LA STOP 3"x3• SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBING, DARK BRONZE COLOR OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL JURISDICTION OR LANDLORD REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: SIGNS SHALL BE FABRICATED USING SIT 0.08 NON -ILLUMINATED ALUMINUM WITH 2"1 VINYL COPY APPLIED TO THE FIRST TUBING SURFACE. RED 'REFLECTIVE' NOTE: COLOR VERIFY COLORS WITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY. 6" DIA. SCH. 80 STEEL - PIPE BOLLARD PAINTED OSHA YELLOW FILLED WITH CONCRETE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR PAINT CONCRETE BLACK AFTER CURING AT ASPHALT LOCATIONS E ON BLUE 4000 PSI CONCRETE 8"0 CONCRETE BASE 2'x2' SQ. TUBING LETTERING STYLE TO BE HELVETICA MEDIUM A B STOP SIGN & STANDARD ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN MOUNTING POST (MUTCD R 7-8 AND R 7-8P5) (MUTCD R 1-1) (CIVIL TO VERIFY SIGN PANELS AND COLORS WITH STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS) NOTE: ADA SIGN SHALL BE PER MN STATUES 169.346 AND INCLUDE THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY COMPLYING WITH MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION 703.6.3.1 CIVIL TO VERIFY RAMP ;S 5 STANDARD PARKING STALL REQUIREMENTS BY STATE. C-4.0 NOT TO SCALE .... __._..._.._____,. _.... ..._.----."_,...... ._...................�._.,.,___._......3 MATCH SIDEWALK WIDTH MATCH SIDEWALK WIDTH S MIN. CT MIN. RAMP 5MIN. 1' MIN. 3' MIN, RAMP 1' MIN, TRANSITION TRANSITION TRANSITION TRANSITION tD 1V:10H MqX. �- :10H MAX` CURB CURB LIGHT BROOM FINISH MONOLITHIC CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE RAMP (3000 PSI) GUTTER SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 5%AT LANDING AREA SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE RAMP CI.0 NOT TO SCALE 24.625' 8 SPACES OUT TO OUT 1.2625' 1.-I r14 _ DOMES @ 1.670" O/C 1.2625" w OO 00000000000 U O 000000000000 0 00000OOee0000 e0000000000000 0e00o0e0oee0eo 00000000000000 00000000000000 'O OOe0000e000000 B 0000000e000eee B 3.00" @ 3.00• Q!C NOM. 3.00" INTERNALEMBEDMENT FLANGE 9 PER TILE 0.625" 0 c o o °D io 00000000 000oeo 0.1875'DIA.x0.0825"HIGH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MICRO -TEXTURE UNDERSIDE ... .. .. .. . .. ... v 0e 000000000000 000eee000eo0o0 0.625' 0.625" 00000000eeo000 0.625"DUL HOLES ii THROUGH EMBEDMENT REFLECTED PLAN H 1.2625" 1.670' TYP. N 1.2625• 1.670" TYP PLAN 1.670" TYP. 1.2625" m c �� 000000 000000000 000 fn 000000 000000000 000 000000 000000000 000 m �6 00000 0000 O o� 0000 00 00 0 0.1875" 0.625' HOLE THROUGH 000 O O O O O m EMBEDMENT FLANGES AS 0.1875' DIA. VENT HOLE ONE PER 000 0 000 O SHOWN IN REFLECTED PLAN CELL EACH SIDE) 000 0 ,sad O 0 O CENTERED TYP. SECTION A -A 0 0 0 0 ry' 00 0 0 0 0 00000 0000000 90 POINTS o"TYP. t.zszs 00000000 OOO 1.2625" 1.670" TYP 0.045" HIGH 1.87 1n � O O O O O O 0 0.1875'DIA.VENT m_ 0000 000000000000000 HOLE ONE PER o �0 000 00 000000000 000 9 CELL EACH SIDE) 00O O 0000000 00 0000 00000 0 000 0 000 000 m O O O o0°0 0 0 000 3.O(r TYP. 3.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N 0.1875' 0.625' DIA. HOLE 0 EMBEDMENTINTERNAL E EDMENT NOTE: OPTI NAL o 3.00" FLANGES AS FLANGE @ 3- O/C (SEE SOUND AMPLIFYING 0.09, 0.09, ° SHOWN IN PLAN FOR ORIENTATION) PLATE ADDED BY NOTE: REFLECTED PLAN MANUFACTURER 0.09' 0.09, FIELD LEVEL MICRO -TEXTURE SECTION B-B 41 POINTS PER SQUARE ro TRUNCATED DOMES - CAST IN PLACE DETAIL-1 INCH C 4.0 NOT TO SCALE ONLY IF REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL ORDINANCE (CIVIL ENGINEER TO VERIFY) SIDEWALK N .Y IF REQUIRED) " SIDE FLARES TO BE 1:12 WHERE THERE IS NO Nat, LANDING AT TOP OF \ \� RAMP. V X. SIDEWALK ,ynsaz>°saei*a� CURT PAVEMENT FLARED SIDES 1V:10H MAX. GUTTER SLOPE SH/ EXCEED 5%AT LANI kMP W/ FLARED SIDES NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. CURB RAMP RUNNING SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 1:12 AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2% OR FLATTER. 2. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY TEXTURING PRODUCTS CONFORMING TO PROWAG R304. TRANSITION SLOPES ARE NOT TO HAVE DETECTABLE WARNINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM LOCAL CODES ARE MET. 3. WHERE A CURB RAMP IS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN EXISTING CURB, CURB & GUTTER AND/OR SIDEWALK, THE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE NEAREST JOINT BEYOND THE CURB TRANSITIONS OR TO THE EXTENT THAT NO REMAINING SECTION OF CURB OR CURB & GUTTER IS LESS THAN S LONG. THE EXISTING SIDEWALK SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE NEAREST JOINT BEYOND THE TRANSITION SLOPE WALK AROUND OR TO THE EXTENT THAT NO REMAINING SECTION OF SIDEWALK IS LESS THAN 5. 4. THE PLAN MUST PROVIDE FOR DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE COLORS OR MATERIALS THAT PROVIDE THE NECESSARY CONTRAST, EITHER DARK -ON -LIGHT, OR LIGHT -ON -DARK. STANDARD DOME COLOR IS BRICK RED. 5. TRUNCATED DOMES TO BE INSTALLED USING ARMOR TILE CAST IN PLACE DOME TACTILE TILE. PART NUMBER ADA-2424 OR OTHER EQUIVALENT APPROVED MATERIAL. PREFERRED MANUFACTURER ARMOR TILE TACTILE SYSTEMS LANCE MITCHELL(919)622-0615 UNLESS PAVERS ARE REQUIRED, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THAT CURB RAMPS MEET LOCAL CODES AND ADA REQUIREMENTS. to GRASS 1V:12H MAX. 1 GRASS PAVEMENT FLARED SIDES CURB RAMP W/ SHORT FLARED SIDES NOT TO SCALE SMOOTH TOOLED" CONTRACTION JOINT FINISH AROUND "EXPANSION JOINT (SEE NOTE #1) ALL EDGES (TYP)-\ (SEE NOTE #1)� A 61 I -III. BOLLARD MOUNTED SIGN DETAIL WHITE DO NO RE Right LETTERS urn FACE: ENTER 3M REFLECTIVE COPY Only (#3272 RED)COLOR C E DO NOT ENTER RIGHT TURN ONLY SIGN (REFER TO SIGN PACKAGE) (REFER TO SIGN PACKAGE) 12" tz ppedest m D PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK (REFER TO SIGN PACKAGE) 6 DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE C-4.0 NOT TO SCALE NOTE: _'SIGNS PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY CFA SIGNAGE CONTRAC y. CONCRETE C-4.0 SIDEWALK / DROVIDE & SQUARE MINIMUM '.• ,, " "• `r' ` WDING AT TOP OF RAMP FOR LANDSCAPE AREA CHANGE IN DIRECTION tI EXPANSION JOINT a2j - O � 's,_a'e .•,a �' 'P:a 'a��; �� .. ,4 .. .:. ..'r. a. .a•: ."Y F, • 6 � a.• Wk• .... :.aIka'm: ga' j r LIGHT BROOM FINISH (PERPENDICULAR TO TRAVEL PATH) CONCRETE SURFACE AREA INSIDE OF TOOLED EDGE TO CREATE PICTURE FRAME EFFECT URETHANE JOINT SEALING 6"x6"x6 GAUGE WELDED COMPOUND, "ZIP STRIP` OR WIRE FABRIC SEATED AND APPROVED EQUAL. SECURED ON STANDS 3D00 PSI COMPRESSIVE 2) STRENGTH CONCRETE 1 I MIX PER SPECIFICATION. I I I •T I d !• ti I M ••i •1 6 ••J. �..•+.w-.• «I `v , a a•• :.• . w Jam. a Y 'ice i •- I I }' DECK-0-FOAM EXPANSIO 4• AGGREGATE SEE NOCONTTE #1�ON JOINT JOINT FILLER W/ PRESCORED BASE COURSE STRIP OR OTHER CFA APPROVED MATERIAL EXPANSION JOINT CONTRACTION JOINT 11 TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK C 4.0 NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. JOINTS AT 51 TOOLED }'WIDE, 1' DEEP OR MAX. g DEEP BOTH RAMP CURBS TO BE PAINTED YELLOW, S PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATION 6" STANDUP CURB OR CURB & GUTTER AS APPLICABLE (SEE SITE PLAN) LANDSCAPE AREA / 9 RETURNED CURB ACCESSIBLE RAMP C-4.0 NOT TO SCALE SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS VARY - HOLD FLUSH WITH FINISHED FLOOR AT ENTRANCE WAYS. PLANTING AREAS MAY EXIST BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE BACK -OF -SIDEWALK (SEE SITE PLAN). EXPANSION JOINTS DO NOT APPLY TO SIDEWALK SECTION ADJACENT TO PLANTING AREAS. NOTICE: ALWAYS ALIGN CURB BUILDING AND SIDEWALK JOINTS. BUILDING FOOTING•;•' , WHICHEVER IS GREATER EXPANSION JOINTS AT 20' MAX & ALL P.C.s, UNLESS APPROVED OR INDICATED OTHERWISE ON PLAN NOTE. VIEW JOINT PATTERN. SLOPE 1:50 PAVEMENT, AS SPECIFIED IN GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 4" AGGREGATES BASE COURSE STABILIZED AGGREGATE BASE COARSE, AS SPECIFIED / FOR PAVEMENT COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS SPECIFIED J SIDEWALK WITH CURB & GUTTER SECTION 1) IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN DETAILS. THE MOST RESTRICTIVE DETAIL SHALL GOVERN NOT TO SCALE Sheet C-4*0 vi �I m rn nLI 0 NI N v 0 v C O N 0 f m 3 w I m a I O NI N 0 V) 0 3 m U)I m 0 al 0 NI m v 0 a c 0 N c �o 3 ro �I m rn a I a 0 `y `o v 0 0 d 3 0 U I N N L �I d E a `m v rn m O N d` m a . m m � o m U a_ = J Z O ; m v w W o m N I I o n00 N 00 _ / p U Em m n o p o 3 "1 a,, I m � 0 1O U N oO o 'O �om0 00 o�- 0 �oP o vmino 0 m 0,o ))J 0 axe L N2 E oU p% E0'm-C 54 1 U) T m rna v x m w fi m O m N O axE0 PLAN VIEW DRIVE-THRU PLAN NOT TO SCALE NOTE: ALL ELEVATIONS ON THIS DETAIL ARE RELATIVE TO FIFE = 0' RADIUS PROTECTION APRON SHALL MEET ' • THE MINIMUM LENGTH AND WIDTH DIMENSIONS AS PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN. •' CONTRACTION JOINTS -' AT S MAX. SPACING LIGHT BROOM FINISH 'C OTHERWISE EXPANSION JOINTS 20' MAX. &ALL P.C.s, IN UNLESS APPROVED OR INDICATED OTHERWISE ON PLAN VIEW JOINT PATTERN. \ 24' CONCRETE CUP & GUTTER '' , '8 < rt e ' ' a x 8 ,. :,t A ` •; . •. ^°e , . 4# : ^ s . ssd: - ' d 8F N } ;Rrt,: « x?• 4: "° d& •a j e." $ • 4� •',d. .. '' 4:. $• \ C \C✓ ON \ pA��MFA, F \ \ \ SEE GEOTECHNICA_ REPORT FOR THICKNESS OF AGGREGATE UNDERNEATH PAVEMENT AND CURB CONCRETE FOR RADIUS PROTECTION SUBBASE PREPARED AND COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM AND GUTTER SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE DENSITY OF 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR OR AS STRENGTH OF 3000 P.S.I. AT 28 DAYS. SPECIFIED BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SEE NOTE #1 CROSS SECTION LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PROTECTOR C-0.1 NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 2'-0" REFUSE ENCLOSURE PLAN GENERAL NOTES: FY P o a 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR LAYOUT OF CONCRETE LOADING PAD. 2. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ELEVATIONS ON DUMPSTER O PAD AND DRAINAGE OF INTERIOR TRASH ENCLOSURE. SAW JOINT w 3. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON APPROACH PAD AWAY FROM DUMPSTER. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS L4. 6' THICK 4000 PSI CONCRETE < o ON TRASH ENCLOSURE APPROACH PAD WITH #3's @ 0 Ow ;l 12' ON CEN ER EACH WAY " 5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DRILL HOLES FOR GATE PINS IN BOTH THE OPEN AND CLOSED POSITION. SAW JOINT 12. 3 112' A., 12' 3 1/2" 8'-4 1„ , (,. YP. 71;�_s 2'-0' CHAMFER Ib�... ..e ., x ., „ 6"HEADER CUR +), •e_ :. ..' .a ' .. .. .L• •;. ,f".. '. "' ,.. .'i Y ,•( t •�,. •CONCRETE •` • • v A• •'.0. 4 i .. ' DRIVE-THRU LANE fE CURB °.,.tj: ;+ , • �R111O :. ' N Cif . .. _ , .,U;. , •' li' HEADER U' END 24' CURB aFACE GUTTER "• ,,• - .• Nlm "' '• 'i CURB • •• AND GUTTER OF CURB ' _ • Ix., ., s < FACE OF BUILDING EL=S 'qi t 4^t'a EL. -2"' EL. F 7 - 6.0 BOLLARD / ZU GATEPOSTS FOUNDATION RE: CIVIL EDGE OF FOOTING - BELOW PIPE BOLLARDS EMBED BOLLARDS IN 18" DIA. x T-6" CONCRETE FILLED HOLE in TY P. 8' II I� 3'-8" 4'-0' 9'-2' 4'-0" 4'-5" 2. m ' 8" 25•_4" U-8" 8" 34'-B" NOTES: 1, ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY SIZE &COORDINATE WITH IF INTERIOR DRAIN IS NOT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. REQUIRED, OMIT 8' BLOCK WIDTH AT FLOOR LEVEL, BOTH 2. RE: CIVIL FOR DRAINAGE. SIDES, FOR DRAINAGE OUTSIDE OF DUMPSTER AREA. 3. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT DETAILS. SCREENED REFUSE ENCLOSURE FOUNDATION PLAN NOT TO SCALE L6" THICK 4000 PSI CONCRETE APPROACH PAD WITH #3's 12" ON CENTER EACH WAY I TOP d N SLAB b- Q�I� 8" O m ¢jam 1. Ir 11� *BP EF 0'-6- SLAB ;,ad4 I 0 Al BLIC - J L EDGE OF SPREAD 0.6" FOOTING 8" 6'-8" 8" I PEF- SLAB IF INTERIOR DF IS NOT EQ 4'-0" EQ REQUIRED, OMIT 8"CK WIDTH I TYP TYP TYP I o AT FLOOR LE\ BOTH SIDES, FOR DRA E OUTSIDE OF _ UMPSTER AREA. 13' 13' B" 34-4- 19 AEFUSE ENCLOSURE FOUNDATION PLAN C-4.1 NOT TO SCALE u, \ /sFFQ/zo,�N TQp �RQss \ \ j�W�A �NWJ Aa SAE GENOPAJ� DO�OANO OF AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SEE NOTE #1. DRIVE-THRU ISOMETRIC 72, 1 Pj NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. PAVEMENT DIMENSION REFER TO I PAVEMENT DIMENSION FACE OF CURB UNLESS INDICATED FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE OTHERWISE + 1}"R m ro d 3" PER FT. ih LIGHT BROOM FINISH OSPILLING CURB AND GUTTER PAVEMENT DIMENSION REFER TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE T }"R 1 R o io • �a" PER FT. (V • i OB CATCHING CURB AND GUTTER PAVEMENT DIMENSION REFER FACE OF CURB UNLESS INDICT OTHERWISE J"R ip-hc a ijn '. 5.0 E 5.0% MAX. . :N 4 �. . d e. d. a .' LIGHT BROOM FINISH LIGHT BROOM FINISH OC DEPRESSED SPILLING CURB AND GUTTER OD DEPRESSED CATCHING CURB AND GUTTER' CONCRETE FOR CURBING SHALL HAVE CONSTRUCTION STAKING FOR CURBING AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION THE GUTTER THICKNESS A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH INSTALLATION SHALL BE REFERENCED MAY BE INCREASED AT THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO OF 3000 P.S.I. AT 28 DAYS. (CUT OR FILL) TO THE TOP OF CURB MAKE BOTTOM OF GUTTER PARALLEL WITH PAVING OF BASE COURSE. CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. TOOLED 1/4" (31/16',-0) WIDE, V OR MAX. D14 DEEP WHICHEVER IS GREATER. EXPANSION JOINTS AT 40' MAX. AND ALL P.C.'s, UNLESS APPROVED OR INDICATED OTHERWISE ON PLAN VIEW JOINT PATTERN. 24" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER GATE POSTS FOUNDATION RE: CIVIL EDGE OF FOOTING BELOW PIPE BOLLARDS EMBED BOLLARDS IN 18" DIA. x T-6" CONCRETE FILLED HOLE JOINT L 6"THICK 4000 PSI CONCRETE lk APPROACH P AD WITH #3's @ 12" ON CEN ER EACH WAY SAW JOIN 12' 3 1 /2" 12' �' om NOTES: 1. MATERIAL. ID POLYETHYLENE 2. WHEEL STO LOR: YELLOW 3. MANUFACTURE LASTICS-R-UNIQUE, INC. 352 MILL STREET WADSWORTH, OH CONTACT- BOBBIE PE 330-334-4820 PHONE 330-334.4720 FAX 4. USE ONLY MANUFACTURER S IED LAGS AND SPIKES 5. PRE -DRILL HOLES THROUGH PARKI URFACI (" BIT FOR LAGS AND %" BIT FOR SPA C 8. FILL PRE -DRILLED HOLES WITH HEAVY D CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE SUCH AS PL400 " TYP. m� OF S d o d I m b I io VS may, S, 2,. 4' 0„ 4 5. m .6' 8' 8" ''.. 26-4" 34'-0' CONNECT FLOOR DRAIN ORM DRAINS SYSTEM, PER LOC QUIREMENTS NTERIOR DRAIN IS NOT NOTES: IRED, OMIT 8' BLOCKt 1. ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY SIZE & COORDINATE WITH W AT FLOOR LEVEL, BOTH; SIDE R DRAINAGE OUTSIDE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. OF DU ER AREA. 2. RE: CIVIL FOR DRAINAGE. REFUSE ENCLOSURE ALTERNATE DRAINAGE PLAN NOT TO SCALE (3) 8" LAGS FOR C ETE PAVEMENT OR 1Y GALVANIZED PLATE KES FOR ASPHALT PAVEMENT REQUIRED FOR EACH _L STOP. SEE MANUFACTURER'S INSTR - ONS FOR INSTALLATION. SOLID PLASTIC WHEEL STOP NOT TO SCALE NOTE: WHEEL STOPS ONLY TO BE USED WHEN NO OTHER PRACTICAL OPTION EXISTS 12" L NOTES 1. PRE-C PANSION JO TERIAL SHALL BE USED IN ALL EXP ON JOINTS. 2. D Y JOINTS SHALL BE IN LED AT 10 ft. INTERVALS, IMUM. STALL EXPANSION JOINTS EVER ft., MAXIMUM, AT ENDS OF RADIUS, AND AMINIMUM OF 5ft. F INLET STRUCTURES. 4. BREAK AS NEEDED TO ENSURE POSITIV INA' 5. CONCRETE TO BE 5,000 P.S.I. 6. MOUNTAB . URB TO BE PAINTED YELLOW. #4's ROLLOVER/MOUNTABLE CURB N NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. EXPANSION JOINT FILLER SHALL BE FLEXIBLE, LIGHTWEIGHT, NONSTAINING, POLYETHYLENE, CLOSED -CELL EXPANSION JOINT TROWELED, ROUNDED CONCRETE 6"" STEEL PIPE (SCHEDULE 80) FILLED N WITH CONCRETE 3 PAINT BOLLARD WITH DARK BRONZE TONE _ EXTERIOR ENAMEL PAINT WITH TOP 12" ~O INCHES PAINTED SAFETY YELLOW AT DRIVE - p THRU-ORDER POINT. PAINT BOLLARD WITH BRONZE TONE EXTERIOR ENAMEL PAINT AT O ALL OTHER LOCATIONS. Z ww z ANCHOR STEEL PIPE IN CONCRETE FOOTING, 2'-0" DIAMETER x 2'-6" DEPTH 4 EXPANSION JOINT C ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT/ APPLICATIONS SLAB APPLICATIONS 1=11�ll- I kil 1IIM11-I1I-I1 I I r I I I I I �I 4 I��=I 1) IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN DETAILS. THE MOST RESTRICTIVE DETAIL SHALL GOVERN I T-O" CONCRETE BOLLARD NOT TO SCALE NOTE: BOLLARD HEIGHT SHALL BE V-0" AT DRIVE-THRU WINDOW Sheet C-4. �I a I O N NI 0 c 0 V) m 3 iol d rn al O NI N `o s C_ O f as 3 of dl 0 o_I 0 NI v `o v c 0 VI 0 3 w 40I a0 al 0 NI 0 0 V) c a m y 0 3 o: w 0 xo I N n N L V a E n d v c 0 O m., w- ++ o O O w. p O p O a� J U O r J � a 0 3 00 v E dt O y o p N II o I Ln C4 N � = U p / E a a O o p3 M 5 O I ° c0J o / 'o U M N p xxp o 3m m Oppp p Apr o vmrnp O / Offn1J C 0-X �L N E o ILL o E=m./ �U n 7i 00 f( Mrn ri o 0 o E axEC) EXTEND BASE 6" BEYOND FOR APPLICATIONS WITHOUT CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, BUILDINGS 1.5" THICK ASPHALTIC OR OTHER STRUCTURES. SURFACE COURSE 2.5' THICK ASPHALTIC BINDER COURSE f...:.. S. ":31:... .. AGGREGATE BASE ,.,.ti i£.. 4 THICK DENSE GRADED J//f ITACK COAT, 0.05 GALBY.F PRESENT ON -SITE, UNSUITABLE SUBGRADE MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED WITH SUITABLE SUBBASE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL SEE NOTE #1 REPORT. 4" THICK FREE DRAINING AGGREGATE BASE MIRAFI 15ON GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPICAL HMA PAVEMENT SECTION NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE SITE SPECIFIC GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT, AGGREGATE, AND SUBGRADE SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. MINIMUM PAVEMENT THICKNESS SHOULD BE 6" GRADED AGGREGATE BASE, 2.0"ASPHALT PAVEMENT BINDER & 2.0' ASPHALT PAVEMENT SURFACE COURSE TACK COAT. EXTEND BASE 6' BEYOND FOR APPLICATIONS WITHOUT CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, BUILDINGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 1.5" THICK ASPHALTIC 2,5" THICK ASPHALTIC SURFACE COURSE BINDER COURSE f f %-' '- ^3 3 f F F 3 Fm<-R I�t^•••^I ; . 4' THICK DENSE GRADED -� IF PRESENT ON -SITE, UNSUITABLE SUBGRADE AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED WITH SUITABLE SUBBASE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL SEE NOTE #1 REPORT. 4" THICK FREE DRAINING TACK COAT, 0.05 GALBY. AGGREGATE BASE MIRAFI 15ON GEOTEXTILE FABRIC HEAVY DUTY HMA PAVEMENT SECTION NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE SITE SPECIFIC GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT, AGGREGATE, AND SUBGRADE SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. MINIMUM PAVEMENT THICKNESS SHOULD BE 6' GRADED AGGREGATE BASE, 4.0"ASPHALT PAVEMENT BINDER & 2.0" ASPHALT PAVEMENT SURFACE COURSE TACK COAT. 40M PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE MIX PER SPECIFICATION. 6"x6"xW1.4 x W1.4 GAUGE WELDED WIRE FABRIC iV SEATED AND SECURED ON STANDS a 'a. > > E • aff e ` PRIME i l l I I I II I lEl 111 l li l 11 l 11 l 11 l 11 l 11 l 11 11=1 11 4' AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SEE NOTE #1. SUBBASE SEE NOTE #1 .. jNL MC 1 C r/AV IIV V UF[1 V C- 1 Flr%U L NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. VERTICAL SAW CUT }" WIDE (MIN.) a a e • • • • d 4A l f URETHANE JOINT SEALING COMPOUND (TOP -JP NO SEALING COMPOUND) #3 BARS ON 1 B" CTRS. BOTH SUBBASE WAYS SEE NOTE#1 NOTES: 1. JOINT SPACING TO BE 12' x 1Z WITH EVERY OTHER JOINT BEING AN EXPANSION JOINT. CONTRACTION JOINT C 4. NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE }" WIDE SAWED OR PREMOLDED JOINT, 12' MAX. SPACING, SEAL JOINTS WITH POLYURETHANE SEALANT TO WITHIN }' FROM TOP. as •,� a Ad .A.;.' Y• �" 6"4 ,. .. $•.: SEE PLAN FOR SLAB J SUBBASE THICKNESS SEE NOTE #1 TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CONTRACTION JOINT NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. PROPOSED CURB & GUT7ER (FULL HEIGHT) a' CONCi{ DEPRESSED CURB a ° As AND GUTTER 4 ^: R h a LOCA77ONS Q ' .s• ••�,•, a .1 ^y ,�• g• LANDSCAPED AREA J ' 'R ,�, .^" 'a ''' LANDSCAPED AREA s # a • PROPOSED CURB & Gb 9 ER (FULL HEIGHT) 1-- 60"-�1 60" ��., a ' `�_•z�.RAD/I/5.� I I 8 `�',RA,I3/USaam,R,-�_:°� a ' sfoPe R s ILL; ^' :SUDP�e' . .. ., d•.' � y '` Jt. 'Ra .' i•8'.. .8k 'a••'IP,. d•' 1. 9•� R.be VARIES (SEE PLANS FOR CURB TYPE) 4000 PSI - CONCRETE 4"AGGREGATE 6'x6"x6 GAUGE WELDED BASE COURSE WIRE FABRIC SEATED AND - SECURED ON STANDS N NOT TO SCALE AS SPECIFIED IN GEOTECHNICAL REPORT THESE DETAILS APPLY TO 2' THICK ASPHALTIC SURFACE COURSE (MIN, MATCH EXISTING) i 2' THICK ASPHALTIC BASE COURSE O (MIN, MATCH EXISTING) CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT, REMOVE i 4:1 SLOPE AND REPLACE 2' OF EX. ASPHALT w PAVEMENT TO CONSTRUCT KEY JOINT. v EXE3TING ASPHALT a K c iL35F: COURSE:. PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVING a` �SAWCUT LINE 4" THICK FREE DRAINING AGGREGATE BASE (MIN) KEYED CONSTRUCTION JOINT NOT TO SCALE JOINT SEALANT SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT (AG20, OR EQUIVALENT) FULL DEPTH FOR CLEAN CONSTRUCTION JOINT PROPOSED EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASPHALT PAVEMENT 2m BUTT JOINT C 4.2 NOT TO SCALE 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE SEE PLAN FOR SLAB THICKNESS DOWELED CONSTRUCTION JOINT i ......... ...... . ......j ,a _ a PROPOSED PAVING •` a a 4. E:K:S4tVG?AV1MG HANDRAIL EXTENSION AT . BOTTOM OF RUN SUBBASE SEE NOTE #1 " GRADE A36 STEEL DOWEL 14" LENGTH, 12" O.C. SPACING, GREASE OR SLEEVE ONE END TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL DOWELED CONSTRUCTION JOINT NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNIGAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. ................ �. 14"0 TO 1,"0 !" 1 1 I' LL I 1 d HANDRAIL i DETAIL "A" HORIZONTAL CRETE PAVED LOTS HANDRAIL EXTENSION AT TOP OF RUN CONTRASTING STRIPE ON TOPIBOTTOM NOSING ASPHALT PAVEMENT AND BASE COURSE PAVEMENT THICKNESS SEE NOTE #1 4000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE #3 0 12" ON CENTER 'EACH WAY Ilk 4 �W SUBBASE 12"ErSEE NOTE #1 4" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SEE NOTE #1. #4 REBAR FOR CONTINUOUS REINFORCEMENT OF THICKENED EDGE 24 CONCRETE APRON @ TRASH ENCLOSURE NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. ASPHALT PAVEMENT REQUIRED AT ALL JUNCTIONS WITH CONCRETE AND BASE COURSE PAVEMENT %.=i,,.�l• :L? �. .3.. E..:x = •" ..�\��=.a` THICKNESSy SEE NOTE #1 w. 1 4A PAVEMENT EDGE DETAIL C a.2 NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT SECTION REQUIREMENTS. DETAIL'B" TYPICAL STAIR HANDRAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. USE ONLY COMMERCIAL GRADE ALUMINUM HANDRAIL WITH DARK BRONZE POWDER COAT FINISH SAWCUT FULL DEPTH & CURB = U & GUTTER w w z 0 m Qo 24" LU RICATED SMOI UMTOP•]P NO SEALING r x COMPOUND 1 EL w w N K � 3� X SED X\\ PROP PAVING , VERTICAL SAW CUTJ" (MIN.) URETHANE JOINT SEALING COMPOUND R #3 BARS ON 18" DOWEL SPACED ON TWO (2) ON CENTER EACH WAY FOOT CENTER TO CENTER, LUBRICATE EPDXY B INCHES OFF TIE BARS. NOTES: 1. NO. 5 SMOOTH DOWEL BAR MAY BE USED IN 5 INCH AND 6 INCH PAVEMENT THICKNESS. 2. LONGITUDINAL BUTT CONSTRUCTION MAY BE UTILIZED IN PLACE OF LONGITUDINAL HINGED (KEYWAY) JOINT AT CONTRACTORS OPTION. 3. DOWEL BARS SHALL BE DRILLED & EPDXIED INTO PAVEMENT HORIZONTALLY BY USE OF MECHANICAL EQUIP. 4. PUSHING DOWEL BARS INTO WET CONCRETE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 0Oi LONGITUDINAL BUTT JOINT NOT TO SCALE SET PIPE IN CONIC. FOOTING �t�111��L1JJLaJ IDOWN SHED ON EACH STEP TYPICAL STAIR SECTION NOT TO SCALE x U 0 0 o w 4 24" LUBRICATED NO. 8 SMOOTH m z DOWEL UURETHANE JOINT FL 0 SEALING COMPOUND U a w w d f a a f if MIN. xr d� a x f a 2" (MIN.) • r+-ia CLEARANCE f ` . d f f f• p d f+ i 3 BARS ON 16' DOWEL SLEEVE (CLOSED END) TO ON CENTER EACH WAY FIT DOWEL AND BE SECURED. DECK-O-FOAM EXPANSION JOINT TO BE INSTALLED 1'-0' C.C. FILLER W/ PRE -SCORED STRIP OR LUBRICATE THIS END OTHER CFA APPROVED MATERIAL NOTES: 1. NO. 5 SMOOTH DOWEL BAR MAY BE USED IN 51NCH AND 6 INCH PAVEMENT THICKNESS. 2. LONGITUDINAL BUTT CONSTRUCTION MAY BE UTILIZED IN PLACE OF LONGITUDINAL HINGED (KEYWAY) JOINT AT CONTRACTORS OPTION. 3. DOWEL BARS SHALL BE DRILLED INTO PAVEMENT HORIZONTALLY BY USE OF A MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, 4. DRILLING BY HAND IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, PUSHING DOWEL BARS INTO WET CONCRETE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 5. JOINT SPACING TO BE 24'X24' (EVERY OTHER JOINT) 31 EXPANSION JOINT - v NOTE: 1) IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN DETAILS. THE MOST RESTRICTIVE DETAIL SHALL GOVERN Sheet C-4.2 �I 00 a s N I 0 C 0 `w 0 3 �I d rn 0 al a 0 N I v `o v 0 to d of �I rn 0 al a 0 N I N v 0 a c 0 N c m d 3 �I v o+ al Ory I a `o C 0 V) 0 2 3 d I N r N L �I E J a 0 a rn d c - O ^� I .. 06 w h p O J 7 U a d o .. J 0 3 m �O w rn O O W N p I w 3 0 n 00 N � S / p U E " 0 o. 0 3 p I UU o/ c0 U M N 00 co p m cD o�.. :F Ooonp o N / N Onn O a't _ , 00 I (L O oU 2 E�m/ 5+1 N v x mw � w w E o o a x E c.1 PAINT SOLID PAINT SOLID RESUME TYP CJ PATTERN E MULTI -LANE SPLIT MULTI -LANE MERGE MULTI -LANE DIRECTIONAL GRAPHICS NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO CHICK-FIL-A PARKING LOT STRIPING 5 SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT ON ASPHALT & YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE. ow wucTo I CROSSWALK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. REFER TO PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATION 2. CROSSWALK ALONG AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL C-4.0 MAINTAIN A CROSS SLOPE OF 2% MAX AND A RUNNING SLOPE OF 5% MAX. 11 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL C-0.0 (SEE FDN. PLAN) TOP/SLAB SEE FDN. PLAN FOR WALL REINF. BLDG. LINE ..... ........................._ I CANOPY ABOVE I 12' RESUME TYP PO 5'-0" MIN. 6"x6"x6 GAUGE WELDED WIRE FABRIC SEATED AND SECURED ON STANDS 2" MATCH SIDEWALK SECTION FOR CONCRETE (4" MIN.) 1:50 MAX. (2%) SLOPE / 6" MIN. .3,. • �' ra �F�,'.'a3F .,�" �.::{cya��,.�\,^a�`�'wvi i�t i "i' •�- 2" XPS RIGID FOAM INSULATION MATCH SIDEWALK SECTION FOR AGGREGATE BASE (4' MIN.) 3 PREPARED AND COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION TO DRILL, SET AND EPDXY GROUT DOWEL, IF NOT INSTALLED WHEN THE BUILDING SLAB WAS POURED. 2. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DOOR LOCATIONS DOOR STOOP SHALL EXTEND 12" PAST EACH SIDE OF DOOR MIN. 3. USE A 10'X5' SLAB MINIMUM AT A DOUBLE DOOR ENTRY. 4. USE A 5'X5' SLAB MINIMUM AT A SINGLE DOOR ENTRY. ENTRY DOOR FROST SLAB DETAIL NOT TO SCALE RN ONCRETE SLAB WITH ISLAND L EXTEND CJ c� PAINT THE FACE THROUGH CURB AND 2" TOP OF (fYP.) CURBYELLOW MENU BOARD CJ = CONTRACTION JOINT ISLAND CURB PLAN EJ=EXPANSION JOINT DRIVE PCC SIDEWALK REQUIRED ISLAND CURB ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE 6" PIPE BOLLARD FILLED w. CONCRETE PAINTED DARK BRONZE. E€€ PAINT TOP 12' SAFETY YELLOW AT THIS LOCATION ONLY, I I 6' PIPE BOLLARD 20 FILLED w. CONCRETE C� 1 PAINTED DARK BRONZ PAINT TOP 12" SAFETY YELLOW AT THIS LOCATION ONLY, 6" PIPE BOLLARD FILLED w. CONCRETE PAINTED DARK BRONZE. .,............_....-_.._...._....._.._.._ .... .............� CLEAN OUT AND COVER, j 4' THICK CONCRETE PAD-P-15, PRIME AND PAINT i FLAT BLACK. @ASCPTIAILT SEEEOSEE (PING IS FREE OF C.O. COVER SUCH THAT LOADING IS NOT TRANSMITTED TO PIPING. [ SANITARY I(( COMBINATION TYP. i NOT TO SCALE NOTE: SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR GREASE TRAP DETAIL MIRAFI 140N NON -WOVEN FILTER FABRIC OR EQUAL WASHED STONE 1" DIA. WEEPHOLE (4 REQ'D.) (3 REQ'D. AT CURB INLETS) NOTE: REQUIRED AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES PRE -CAST CATCH BASIN PER D.O.T. HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC RATING. CONFORMING TO ASTM C478 44 STORM WEEP HOLE DETAIL C-4.3 NOT TO SCALE T CLEAR PERIMETER, FREE FROM REBAR, WIRE SCREEN, REINFORCING BARS, ELECTRIC CABLE OR METAL OBJECTS. PAINT TOP 12" SAFETY YELLOW AT THIS LOCATION ONLY, 6" PIPE BOLLARD FILLED w. CONCRETE PAINTED DARK BRONZE. .,............_....-_.._...._....._.._.._ .... .............� CLEAN OUT AND COVER, j 4' THICK CONCRETE PAD-P-15, PRIME AND PAINT i FLAT BLACK. @ASCPTIAILT SEEEOSEE (PING IS FREE OF C.O. COVER SUCH THAT LOADING IS NOT TRANSMITTED TO PIPING. [ SANITARY I(( COMBINATION TYP. i NOT TO SCALE NOTE: SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR GREASE TRAP DETAIL MIRAFI 140N NON -WOVEN FILTER FABRIC OR EQUAL WASHED STONE 1" DIA. WEEPHOLE (4 REQ'D.) (3 REQ'D. AT CURB INLETS) NOTE: REQUIRED AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES PRE -CAST CATCH BASIN PER D.O.T. HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC RATING. CONFORMING TO ASTM C478 44 STORM WEEP HOLE DETAIL C-4.3 NOT TO SCALE T CLEAR PERIMETER, FREE FROM REBAR, WIRE SCREEN, REINFORCING BARS, ELECTRIC CABLE OR METAL OBJECTS. tj kkk 1 2 3' LOOP 1.5 x5 FEET g .p. • -; --t.- 9' - 9.5' DRIVE THRU LANE CONCRETE PAVING 45' BEND (SCH 40 PVC) VEHICLE LOOP DETECTOR PLAN VIEW 2" CLEAR BETWEEN LOOP AND SURFACE LOOP SUPPORT IU BOARD ISOMETRIC VIEW MENU BOARD PARTS LIST t Oi PREFAB (FOLDED) LOOP (1.5' x 5') CONDUIT FROM BUILDING MENU BOARD FOUNDATION O2 1/2" PVC COUPLING O3 1/2" PVC SLEEVE COUPLING ® 1/2" PVC TUBING (3' LENGTH) C 1/2" PVC CORNER FITTING © 1/2" PVC 90" ELBOW O7 1/2" PVC TUBING (2' LENGTH) SECTION VIEW 35 MENU BOARD LOOP DETECTION SYSTEM NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. LOOP DETECTOR IS MODEL NO. VDL100 VEHICLE DETECTION LOOP MANUFACTURED BY MH ELECTRONICS, INC. 2. FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INSTALLATION. 5"x 6" DOWNSPOUT OPTION "B" - SMALLER BUILDINGS 6" SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH WIRE SCREEN FOR RODENTS -SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET �2" MAXIMUM SEE NOTE #1� 1 %MINIMUM SLOPE SEE NOTE #2 STORM SEWER PIPE (SIZE VARIES) SEE GRADING PLAN FOR LOCATION TO WITHIN 5' FROM BUILDING, REMAINDER TO BUILDING & HOOKUP IS TENANT RESPONSIBILITY All NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. FOR ALL DEPTHS OF COVER LESS THAN TWO (2) FEET, PIPE MUST BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. FOR DEPTHS OF COVER GREATER THAN TWO (2) FEET, FLEXIBLE PIPE MAY BE USED. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE PIPE TYPES. 2. A WATERTIGHT CONNECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED WITH ANY TRANSITION FROM SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE TO ANY OTHER PIPE TYPE. 3. THE DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR DRAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE DOWNSPOUTS ARE INSTALLED ON THE BUILDING. SITEWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK INCLUDING THE RODENT SCREEN, BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONNECTION AT THE POINT OF THE RODENT SCREEN. AGGREGATE BASE COURSE WASHED STON ALL ARGUN 3'-0" TRANSITION TYP. ALL AROUND TYPICAL SECTION AT MANHOLE ........ - ....... LENT TYPICAL SECTION AT INLET/CATCH BASIN SE NON -WOVEN FILTER FABRIC 1" DIA. WEEPHOLE (4 REQ'D.) TYPICAL SECTION AT INLET/CATCH BASIN DETAIL NOTE: 1) IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN DETAILS. THE MOST RESTRICTIVE DETAIL SHALL GOVERN NOT TO SCALE Sheet C 403 �I m rn a al s NI m 0 a U) a 3 I o� 0 al 0 N I 0 a 0 0 0 3 m In W d I N NI 0 0 fn 0 d 0 3 i+ m �I v O+ O al a 0 NI R `o O N E 0 3 0 N IN N L �I n E n d v c P d `0MY m � w +; 0 3 m� a O O a H U� L_ J 0 3 m � m 0 0 00 N 1 I �2 Ln 3Ln r io N 00 = U n c v O 3 NI C3 I UU O t0 U PO C4 N p LLo n 0,03 CO 3 E GO OVA p Apr O Mv)C3 N O,r1D3J C FL 't N= E O ILL EYM, ED I V) <W � M O) 0 d o E a X E 00 IA momm1FLY era" CaRrmDL Fe" av&W"ar srOC~ LFAW oas 49M ro AUON' fiYf gouneVr Y04ENM Wr I I 9102 B 001VIROC aBIX __W EAW WEsroaae� L& E am ELNREM MOW30U s E I ro Al1dY fCYP EWA I L___ [RMFMW num am aWBfiveull FLEXSTORM INLET FILTERS PRODUCT SELECTION AND SPECIFICATION DRAWING SIAH41 E55 STEEL ROUND INLET FILTERS W NYID%ASI CASFMKE5 C0iTCHi15$ W/R. M4 BAGS 2 I;I SFLEC'IYW?i FILTER BAG PART NUtASA J^_- DtSmMd FILTER 0A61 ISM^4.RNI 11Yd[ftli).. Oe:. V.WtM Flow MnA.O'.5. fi GJMD LWNET,C I 1 uFr,IANOLEs 11G411GF STEEL SV9PEHBION SYSTEM SPEOFIGJIONS FOR STANDARD BAO68Y NOMINALSIZE FllteYRd Flow Rate at 5®A A4Wt PC fHI '""'PCP W SOLde No.] StotagR fX � IL PeteW Pett.Nt fine 9i;e (cOFt) (Wmxn) lPo-se (Nor IDF) IA%1 COnIIr Worth SQ,WII 1fi 1.2 0.8 0,9 64 159 MRdlum 31 18 13 1-3 96 16S L 93 22 1.5 16 120 3G9 xi Wz as zA 26 192 9�D e RCLINRrfit(7i SQL,'. DIY. adX+NtIOn C�aCla •^PCNWetba MSO9dc avh and NAYCtIa'SLimmlrWt wGe6c ttiry W6TA1lAT i t. RFWVE DILATE 2 On1W fIEY8T01M WHET FLIER ONTO LOUD eFnnwD uP of cAenHD oR caHCRErE WIRIIGIIIRE A RERMEDRATE 3 CAEATEYOSRFIEXSrORMINLETRLMRPARTNLMFR RMne P/N frmi, RIteTBBg P(N Step 1. flPm 4e 2 A'I�enWl 46 SILT FENCE NEAR TOE OF E ROADWAY SLOPE AND OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS VA0.3ABLE \ ....CAL ;yy LOCATION OF SILT FENCE AT TOE OF ROADWAY EMBANKMENT ALL PRODUCTS MANUFACTURED BY INLET 8 PIPE PROTECTION, INC DISTRIBUTED BY ADS WW W.IN LETFILTERS.COM (866) 287-8655 PH (6W) 3563477 FX �n �u R�5M�� DiE"IL '90 s INV = 9 .7KiTOP INV = 945 VIEW R-1713 CL RIM = 949.85 STAMPED OSTORM0 TOP OF WALL = 1.75' INV = /R 47. D 9 5' DIM. PRECAST STORM MANHOLE 3 WEIR .87 5 FT. MDi. LENGTH POST r FUTURE BRIDGE AT 6 H. MAX. SPACING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC.36"WIDE ROADWAY SHOULDER ------- 1—-------------- 4 PLASTIC ZIP TIES ------- --------------+I ISO L8. TENSILE 1 _____________________y LOCATED IN TOP 8" TIRE COMPACTION ZONE BRIDGE END SLOPE +v-EMBANNMEM —�` V� ROW l.2REgeC FLOW SILT FENCE WRAPPED AROUND 1'YAE TOE OF EMBAM(MENT TOE OF SLOPE CE e �N322"" DEPTH BRIDGE FILL SILT FENCE, MACHINE SLICED DESIGN GUIDELINES: DESIGN GUIDELINES, WATO COURSE FLOW VELOCITY, STAGNANT TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW. CONIRIBUTING SLOPE AREA, 1/2 ACRE MAXIMUM CONTRBKRDN. ARE4 I ACRE. J' FUTURE BRIDGE r ROADWAY SHOLEOER __I_______________ RE FABRIC. %"WIDE {r_____ .4 __________________ ___ TER AGGREGATE O 5 FT. MIN. LENGTH MST AT 6 FT. M SPACING GEOTEXTRE FABRIC. 36" WIDE I EMBAWMENT .-� BRIDGE END SLOPE SAND BAG BARRIER 3 FT. V HIM ADJACENT TO WATER (SOPLASTIC LB. ZIP TENS(LETIES 1 FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENOL E FROM TOFF" MNEND SLOPE. LOCATED IN TOP B" ^ RACEFDl WITH TAMPED SILT FENCE TO MEET )TEXTILE FABRIC NATURAL SOIL. SEE OPTIONAL SAND BAG BARRIER / - METHOD W INSET. TOE OF SLOPE, - OPTIONAL METHOD FOR SILT FENCE. HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE I DISTRUIBED SOIL. W AREA DRAINS . IS 0 STREAM • ° , • /.• /• / ° SAT FENCE- CONSTRUCTION LMDTS 25, WL WITH . 10-20X SLOPE MADE . MiNiMIWF PSSI" , TURNING RADIUS . W. •� DAY BE LARGER WITH LARGER EOINPWDM CONSTRUCTION—] LIMITS '—STREA4 BANX OR 70E OF SLOPE STREAM RANX M TOE OF SLOPE PLAN VIEW SIDE VIEW SILT FENCE, J-HOOK INSTALLATION 5 6" MIN. SILT FENCE, HEAVY DUTY (HANG INSTALLED) DESIGN GUIDELINES: TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW. NAKIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA, I ACRE. 5 FT. MIN, LENGTH POST AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING FLOW VI& m SWyEEI l 9 SILT FENCE,PREASSEMBLED DESIGN GUIDELINES& TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW. MIAMIMOM CONTRIBUTING AREA: 1 ACRE. TEXTILE FABRIC, %"WIDE PUS FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. BAWILL WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOB. BRIDGE FILL DESIGN GUIDELINESt WATER COURSE FLOW VELOCITY, 1 TO T FT✓SEC. CONTRIBUTING SLOPE AREA, 1 ACRE ROADWAY SHOULDER ti^ EM6ANUIDIT -�'� SILT I MEET TOE OF SLOPE _ BRIDGE :VENT OR WORK ft0A° END SLOPE TEMPORARY SHEETING ADJACENT r'TO WATER COURSE. EXTEHO 10 FT )id(A• I BACK FROM TOE OF ENO SLOPE. EMBANKMENT OR WORK ROAD FILL DESIGN GUIOEL1NESt WATER COURSE FLOW YELOCIiri B i0 15 FT✓$EC. CONTRD)UTDIG SLOPE AREA. 3 ACRES SILT FENCE AT BRIDGE EMBANKMENT ADJACENT TO WATER NOTESr SEE SPECS. 25T1. S1A9 A 3886. IQ COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE (SPEC. 11991SWLL 8E INCIDENTAL, PORTABLE CONCRETE WASHOUT CONTAINER BTE STEMS DESCRIPTION A portable, self-contained and watertight container affixed with ramps that controls, captures and contains caustic concrete wastewater and washout material. PURPOSE 8 OBJECTIVE Allows trade personnel to easily washout concrete trucks, pumps and other equipment associated with cement on site and allows easy off site recycling of the same concrete materials and wastewater. APPLICATION Construction projects where concrete, stucco, mortar, grout and cement are used as a construction material or where cementitious wastewater is created. MAINTENANCE Inspect and clean out when '/, full, not allowing the container to overflow. Inspect wastewater level and request a vacuum if needed. Inspect subcontractors to ensure that proper housekeeping measures are employed when washing out equipment. SPECIFICATIONS The container must be portable and temporary, watertight, equipped with ramps and have a holding capacity to accept washout from approximately 350 yards of poured concrete. A vacuum service must accompany washout container and be used by site superintendent as needed. A rampless container may be used in conjunction with a ramped container or by itself if a concrete pump is not needed. The washwater must be disposed of or treated and recycled in an evironmentally safe maanner and in accordance with federal, state or local regulatory guidelines. TARGETED POLLUTANTS Caustic wastewater (high pH level near 12 units) Suspended solids Assorted Metals; Chromium VI, Nickel, Sulfate, Potassium, Magnesium and Calcium Compounds .23 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLAN 70' Min C Existing Ground � B 7 r Wash Rack I (Optional) T- C Coarse Aggregate ' Must Extend Full Width Of Ingress And Egress Operation. 10' Min Positive Drainage o To Sediment Trapping Device. PLAN VIEW Existing Pavement paverne C, /Filter Fabric Mountable (Optional) Existing Ground SIDE ELEVATION NOTES: 9 Filter fabric shall meet the requirements of material specification 592 GEOTEXTILE, Table I or 2, Class , or and sh�lllbe placed over the cleared area prior to the placing of rock. 2. Rock or reclaimed concrete shall meet one of the following IDOT coarse aggregate gradation, CA-1, CA-2, CA-3 or CA-4 and be placed according to construction specification 25 ROCKFILL using placement Method 1 and Class I 1 I compaction. 3.Any drainage facilities required because of washing shall be constructed according to manufacturers specifications. 4-If wash racks are used they shall be ins manufactures specifications. NOTF- REFERENCE STANDARD DWG. O. Project tFSP®fPWITA#&CfB B t�rAlLs. Designed Dale THE MOST RESTRICTIVE DETAIL SH RN Checked DaleA Approved Date DATE 8-18-94 ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS: STORMTECH SC-310 CHAMBER SYSTEMS AASHTO MATERIAL COMPACTION /DENSITY MATERIAL LOCATION DESCRIPTION LU PLEASE NOTE: 1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE, A SPECIFICATION FOR if4 STONE WOULD STATE: "CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR N0.4 (AASHTO M43) STONE". 2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FORA' LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6• (150 DIED) (MAX) LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION, FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS, A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. SECTION MODIFIED BY ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND HR GREEN CLEAN CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A 8 8 LAYERS PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER BACKFILLABOVE � � ) 1 i ADDITIONAL AGGREGATE , • ' ' ' ' . ' ' ' . ' ' ' S `� \• \ `c "m BOTTOM OF FLE%ISLE PAVEME NFOR U DRAINAGE LAYER WITH D �. LA \ \ \ 6° 150 RTKIATONG WHERE ROTTING FROM VE111CLFB MAY � ( Turn) DENSE GRADED a\. r �\ s .. OCCUR. WCREA6ECOVEIe TO2A GOO.1 MIN 18" (2.4 Fri) BASE COURSE t+ 3? 1?;-.<t! tf •ten ti.•�. t?.rt 3?>+i;? rB ..r?3?u9t rib. 't!I Y" „ -3?z arl rt :.-• (450 mm)MIN' MAX ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 801T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL 16" AROUND ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE (405 DIED) LAYER ,CLEAN, CRUSHED, ° ? a� �• ,. '-> >>z ANGULAR STONE TO THE SIDE OF STORMTECH SYSTEM (SEE GRADING PLAN FOR LOCATION � '_ " -�: L..•:e-.a?::-<..l.w�.:v.-�.'Ix:.-,v_..a, l<?:... . _. ,_:. . •rL.:: �. i,-.-t.;, .�....a,,.2>-eY. : ).^. F.�. ,xAi ":.I.l.v'. ,Ll... .=:.3+o-:p. ..1..'i.4:+.A.y`.. :w..� :i.i.' .. :'.". , .... I'll j,.;i.'rE3._ DEPTH OF STONE 10' (250 DIED) MIN ADDITIONAL 10" THICK DRAINAGE LAYER, TO SUBGRADE SOILS ] 8• BE SAME AGGREGATE AS FOUNDATION (SEE NOTE 4) (150 DIED) MIN 34' (8B5 DIED) 12" (300 DIED) TYP STONE (A). LOCATED NEXT TO STORMTECH 12" (300 DIED) TYP SYSTEM (SEE GRADING PLAN FOR LOCATION) SC-310 NOTES: END CAP 1. SC-310 CHAMBERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS", OR ASTM F2922 *STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYETHYLENE (PE) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 2. SC910 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 3. 'ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS* TABLE ABOVE PROVIDES MATERIAL LOCATIONS, DESCRIPTIONS, GRADATIONS, AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FOUNDATION, EMBEDMENT, AND FILL MATERIALS. 4. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY) OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. 5. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. 8. ONCE LAYER'C' IS PLACED, ANY SOILIMATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER'D' UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER'C' OR'D' AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. Z O x U J J � y t w E M 0 0 U rS U ° U) 0 Q. a m $ Q � z Q � H U O12 m ❑ 7 N s- ii m� Z v 4� w io �gr;- o. Sheet C-5*0 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" --- -. — TREE PROTECTION KEY EXIST. TREE TO BE PRESERVED EXIST. TREE TO BE REMOVED lVED (TYP.) °r.._.. \ \ ----- TRUNK PROTECTIVE FENCING FENCE (TYP.)/ EXIST. UTILITY (TYP.).,. 0 20 SCALE PROP. UTILITY i (TYP.) CRITICAL ROOT ZONE 3 le _ - , ....._. r TOTAL QUANTITIES (IN VICINITY OF DISTURBANCE AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS) EXIST. TREES TO BE PRESERVED 5 .• ...d...., .•... _•, EXIST. TREES TO BE REMOVED 19 TOTAL EXISTING TREES TAGGED 24 >i / r GENERAL NOTES 1. THE INTENT IS TO KEEP THE EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED IN TACT ZONED BH TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) �I II RETAINING WALL PROP. MONUMENT SIGN HIGHWAY i THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ON —SITE. IF THE TREES ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING PER THE MUNICIPALITY'S ORDINANCE. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HAUL —OFF OF ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED. CUT ROOTS CLEANLY AT 80'. IF TEARING OCCURS, CUT JUST BEYOND BEGINNING OF TEAR. BACKFILL ALL CUT ROOTS IMMEDIATELY. 1 TYP. ROOT PRUNING DETAIL SCALE: NTS AFTER TREES ARE SAFELY FENCED, NOTHING IS TO BE RAKED OUT, CUT, PLANTED, STORED OR DISTURBED INSIDE THE FENCE BOUNDARY. REMOVE PROTECTIVE FENCE ONLY AFTER ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY TREE DRIPLINES & PLACE PROTECTION DRIPLINE (VARIES) FENCE LOCATION 2 TYP. TREE PROTECTION SNOW FENCE DETAIL SCALE: NTS ORANGE SNOW FENCE 1 %" O.D. GALVANIZED FENCE POST. POST SUPPORTS LOCATED NO MORE THAN 8' APART. LOCATE FENCE AT EDGE OF TREE DRIPLINE OR AT EDGE OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. SITE CALCULATIONS II ` ZONED BH �/ iI t_,-.._... _ -• _ . �- ZONING: BH TOTAL SITE AREA: 57,580t SF. 1.32 AC. NUMBER OF REGULAR PARKING STALLS: 70 NUMBER OF HANDICAP PARKING STALLS: 3 TOTAL NUMBER OF STALLS. 73 - WEST 79TH STREET a ORDINANCE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS . _-_.... _..._. \ BUFFER {F \ \ \ BUFFERAYARD 'A' _ 1 CANOPY TREES, 2 UNDERSTORY TREES' 3 SHRUBS/100' L.F. OF BUFFER YARD. (ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE) ;r ... ....... - _. " BUFFER YARD 'B' 2 CANOPY TREES 4 UNDERSTORY TREES 6 SHRUBS 100' L F OF BUFFER YARD (ALONG HIGHWAY 5) EXIST. FOC EXIST. UTILITY (TYP.)... " ` - AND BOC (TYP.) ` 3 CANOPY TREES, 6 UNDERSTORY TREES, AND 9 SHRUBS REQUIRED. - PROP. UTILITY '�`••• . ;,, - _ — (TYP,) 3 UNDERSTORY TREE AND 20 SHRUBS REQUIRED ._--------------- BUFFER YARD B - 329.9 L.F. OF BUFFER YARD 100 = 3.30 ra 7 CANOPY THE 1 UN Y � BUFFER Y YARD / •+ -— UT UT i f- _ _,.,... , `U i ES S UT UT _ _ .. T Ul ............... z-..-,..., , ,. , .. MATERIAL REQUIRED PROVIDED BUFFER YARD 'A' "SOD" UT' BOUNDARY/R.O.W. T CANOPY TREES 3 2 (INSUFFICIENT SPACE FOR ADDITIONAL TREES DUE TO UTILITIES.) UNDERSTORY TREES 6 3 (INSUFFICIENT SPACE FOR ADDITIONAL TREES DUE TO UTILITIES.) ZONED BH lq o 3 J c p p+ r N � r I � N p x p X J I { T J t' •-�` 'n -------- > x O I M :7 Y O dt0 — — — - ----- m H ml N L Q y rn x a � na u Eo a¢ amrn p in c E HP 471 20' B.S.L. 'TO 12 PM 1- EA 6 .4.; ....... . ............ { CN 49 *�3' PM 1 ` •-.-• PROP. TRASH ENCLOSURE_ \ PROP. EOP AND BOC (TYP.) J ui m 0 IQR 2 RA 21 _M �x LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 N a 6 m i r:� o SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ov'n N = n U r i l % O p S p � w � 3 I •> a c 0 W I a m X N wo V S n y N -O m m . % a ' O i pm E O dX EU QR 2 18' I- QR 2 RA 16 *_(TYP.) RA 16 26' (TYP.) �t PROP. LIGHT POLE (TYP.) SJ 6' HS 34 PA 6, HS 191 .. PM 1 f 1 " BUFFER YARD 'B' EA 13 = CANOPY TREES 7 4 (INSUFFICIENT SPACE FOR ADDITIONAL TREES DUE TO UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE SWALE.) PM 1 €€ C _ UNDERSTORY TREES 13 0 (INSUFFICIENT SPACE FOR ADDITIONAL TREES DUE TO UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE SWALE.) CN 64 PM 1 i °'. / ` -• T" ""`.....,,. SHRUBS 20 68 \ g, / , e � V .: z z SOD / ~ \ INTERIOR LANDSCAPING FOR VEHICULAR USE AREAS % 5'0 MULCH RING (TYP.) \ FOR EACH 100 SQUARE FEET, OR FRACTION THEREOF, OF VEHICULAR USE AREA, EIGHT SQUARE FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED. A MINIMUM OF ONE TREE SHALL BE \ REQUIRED FOR EACH 250 SQUARE FEET OR FRACTION THEREOF, OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPED AREA. /Az 37,750.6 S.F. OF VEHICULAR USE AREA / 100 = 377.5 X 8 = 3,020 S.F. OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED. of 3,803.7 S.F. OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED. 3,020 S.F. OF LANDSCAPE AREA / 250 = 12 TREES REQUIRED. l'aN MATERIAL REQUIRED PROVIDED TREES 12 10 SJ 18 FOUNDATION AND AESTHETIC PLANTINGS o PM 1 A MINIMUM OF ONE TREE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OF FRONTAGE IS REQUIRED. (NORTH PROPERTY LINE) JC 5 PV 9 161 L.F. / 30 = 5.3 Po 5 TREE REQUIRED. MATERIAL REQUIRED PROVIDED J TREES 5 4 (2 PROPOSED AND 2 EXISTING) ui i ZONED BH EA 8 PP 10 JC 5 PV 9 - HS 161 - SJ 11 I PA 6 Ij F_ I? \ c II PROP. RETAINING WALL , lid I-=11111111111111[liEl II ,:1. iiivioly�.��r�+��`O(�►� ��: I� PROP. MONUMENT SIGN _ _ — .......... EXIST. SIDEWALK -----_ -� STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 5 0 20 SCALE NpA?p EXIST. MONUMENT SIGN 4r i G i March 17, 2016 MATERIALS SCHEDULE CITY KEY BOTANICAL NAME/ITEM COMMON NAME SIZE COND REMARKS MATURE SIZE 3 AG AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' APPLE SERVICEBERR IB&B MULTI -STEMMED; MATCHED 20'H X 15'W 5 AP ACER PLATANOIDES'POND' NORWAY MAPLE 2.5" CAL. B&B CENTRAL LEADER; MATCHED 45'H X40'W 7 PM PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA WORTON CIRCLE' LONDON PLANETREE EXCLAMATION 2.5" CAL. B&B CENTRAL LEADER; MATCHED 5UH X 25-30'W 6 OR QUERCUS ROBUR X ALBA'CRIMSCHMIDT OAK 2.5" CAL. B&B CENTRAL LEADER; MATCHED SHRUBS EA EUONYMUS ALATUS 'RUDY HAAG' DWARF BURNING BUSH #5 CONT. 4' O.C.; MATCHED 45'H X 15'W use M?US 44 34H X 4-5'W 20 HA HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS'ABETWO' INCREDIBALL HYDRANGEA #5 CONT. 4' O.C.; MATCHED 4 6'H X 4-6 W 62 RA RHUS AROMATICA'GRO-LOW' FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT. T O.C.; MATCHED 2-TH X 4-6'W 45 SJ SPIRAEA JAPONICA'GOLDMOUND' SPIREA #5 CONT. T O C.; MATCHED 24-36"H X 3 4'W 49 JC JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS 'GOLD LACE' JUNIPER #5 CONT. 4' O.C.; MATCHED 3411 X 4-6 W 34 PP PICEA ABIES'PUMILA' DWARF NORWAY SPRUCE #3 CONT. T O.C.; MATCHED 24-36"H X 34W 12 TO THUJAOCCIDENTALLIS'BAILJOHN' TECHNITO ARBORVITAE #5 CONT. T O.C.; MATCHED 6-8'H X 24-36"W r(i1NDCOVER — - -- --- 113 CN CALAMINTHA NEPETA SSP. NEPETA LESSER CALAMINT #1 CONT. 18" O.C.; MATCHED 18-24"H X 18-24"W 197 HS HEMEROCALLIS'STELLA DE ORO' DAYLILY #1 CONT. 18" O.C.; MATCHED 12-18"H X 12-180W 47 HP HOSTA'PATRIOT' HOSTA #1 CONT. 18" O.C.; MATCHED 18-24"H X 18-24"W 59 PA PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES'DESERT PLAINS' FOUNTAIN GRASS #1 CONT. T O.C.; MATCHED 24-36"H X 34'W 36 PV PANICUM VIRGATUM'HEAVY METAL' BLUE SWITCH GRASS #1 CONT. 24" O.C.; MATCHED 4-6'H X 18-24"W MiSCELLANEOU5 1067 SOD SEE NOTE BELOW SY 52 MULCH 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH CY 4 ROCK 3" DEEP 1"-3" DIAMETER RIVER ROCK MULCH CY PROVIDE STRONGLY ROOTED SOD, NOT LESS THAN 2 YEARS OLD AND FREE OF WEEDS AND UNDESIRABLE NATIVE GRASSES. PROVIDE ONLY SOD CAPABLE OF GROWTH AND 1. DEVELOPMENT WHEN PLANTED (VIABLE, NOT DORMANT). PROVIDE SOD COMPOSED PRINCIPALLY OF AN APPROVED KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS BLEND CONTAINING A MINIMUM OF FOUR IMPROVED VARIETIES. GROUNDCOVER LEGEND SOD 3 z a J a a' 0 0 J 11 z a a w a m I 0 a 0` 0 0 a� o 3 � v N ~ I � W � U O J M 0 O 0 3 N 0 m pf L N v I d I > M V a 1 o I LO xCO to M 'a a 0 04 o .0; go M C L C! Q N 3 U J CE as u Om 0 µ v o L2 O M � X I N n o ^ u 0Y� O OU ao NUN o rn o 0 0 u o I m 0OM 0 � .. wo U 54LO N d 0m 0 N U 0 O dX U NEVER CUT LEADER. GUY ABOVE FIRST BRANCH WITH WOVEN STRAP. SET TOP OF ROOTBALL S0 THAT TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE. PLACE ROOT BALL ON - UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL. TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOTBALL DOES NOT SHIFT. REMOVE AIR POCKETS. PLANTING MIX (SEE SPECS.) SCARIFY SUBGRADE/SIDES OF PLANT PIT. UNDISTURBED SOIL. --� REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, BURLAP AND CUT WIRE BASKET FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. 6" HGT. EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL FOR WATER RETENTION. OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER TO BE 6' DIAMETER. HARDWOOD STAKES 3 STAKES, 2" X 2", DRIVEN FIRMLY INTO SUBGRADE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. MULCH AS DEFINED IN THE LANDSCAPE NOTES SHEET L-1.2. HOLD MULCH 4" FROM TREE TRUNK. 2' FROM SHRUB TO EDGE OF BEDLINE UNLESS SPECIFIED. HOLE TO BE TWICE THE SIZE OF THE ROOTBA DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES; DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN. PRUNE UP TO Y3 OF BRANCHES, RETAINING THE NATURAL SHAPE OF THE TREE. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL WITH SOIL OR MULCH. 1 TREE STAKING DETAIL SCALE: NTS A = ROW SPACING B = ON CENTER SPACING SPACE PLANTS IN A TRIANGULAR PATTERN AS SHOWN, SPACED EQUALLY FROM EACH OTHER AT SPACING INDICATED ON THE PLANT LIST MULCH AS DEFINED IN THE LANDSCAPE NOTES SHEET L-1.2. DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST PLANT STEM. PREPARE GROUNDCOVER BED BY TILLING ENTIRE BED AREA. PROVIDE SOIL MIX AS DEFINED IN THE LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. SET PLANTS AT SAME LEVEL AS GROWN IN CONTAINER. EXISTING SUBGRADE PLANT ROW SPACING 'D' ROW SPACING 'A' PLANTS/10SF e" O.C. 6.9" 26 12" O.C. 10.4" 12 15" O.C. 13.0" 7 16" O.C. 15.7" 5 3 GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NTS CREATE BERM AT 1" HGT. FOR EVERY 1' OF LANDSCAPE ISLAND WIDTH. (9' WIDE ISLAND = 9" BERM). MULCH AS DEFINED IN THE LANDSCAPE NOTES ON SHEET L-1.2. WIDTH VARIES �T f PAVEMENT TYP� CURB &GUTTER TYP. SUBGRADE. SCREENED FRIABLE TOPSOIL MIN 4" DEPTH. 5 PARKING ISLAND DETAIL SCALE: NTS 1" PER 1' OF WIDTH LIMIT PRUNING TO DEAD - AND BROKEN BRANCHES. MULCH AS DEFINED IN THE LANDSCAPE NOTES SHEET L-1.2. TAPER MULCH TO TRUNK. DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST TRUNK. 3'-6" 2'-0' SPACING T AS INDICATED SUBGRADE. CONTAINER SHRUBS. ADD 4" OF PLANTING MIX AND ROTOTILL TO A DEPTH OF 12". PLANTING MIX (SEE SPECS.) 2 SHRUB BED PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NTS TURF SIDE PLANTING BED SIDE 4" MULCH AS DEFINED IN THE LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS SHEET L-1.3, PART 2. HOLD MULCH 4" FROM TRUNK. SHOVEL CUT BED EDGE AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE, 6" DEEP. FINISHED GRADE AT TURF. 4" MINIMUM TOPSOIL. SUBGRADE. 4 "V" TRENCH BED EDGING SCALE: NTS GENERAL NOTES 1. BASE MAP INFORMATION IS ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE PRINTED ON THIS PACKAGE. 2. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS CONTAINED HEREIN ILLUSTRATE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE CONDITIONS. REFER TO SURVEY, ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL ENGINEERING, STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, IRRIGATION AND ALL OTHER DRAWINGS, IF AVAILABLE, FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILED INFORMATION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BECOMING AWARE OF AND FIELD VERIFYING ALL RELATED EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS, UTILITIES, PIPES AND STRUCTURES, ETC. PRIOR TO BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, THE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, THE MUNICIPALITY AND ANY OTHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE AGENCIES NECESSARY FOR UTILITY LOCATION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF APPARENT CONFLICTS WITH CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITIES SO THAT ADJUSTMENTS CAN BE PLANNED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IF FIELD ADJUSTMENTS ARE NECESSARY DUE TO EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS THEY MUST BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY AND ALL COSTS OR OTHER LIABILITIES INCURRED DUE TO DAMAGE OF SAID UTILITIES/STRUCTURES/ETC. 4, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CODES APPLICABLE TO THIS WORK. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH SUBCONTRACTORS AND OTHER CONTRACTORS OF RELATED TRADES, AS REQUIRED, TO ACCOMPLISH THE PLANTING AND RELATED OPERATIONS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL WITH THE INSTALLATION OF OTHER IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS AND RELATED STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RESTORE ALL AREAS OF THE SITE, OR ADJACENT AREAS, WHERE DISTURBED BY OPERATIONS OF OR RELATED TO THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK. 8. ALL SURFACE DRAINAGE SHALL BE DIVERTED AWAY FROM STRUCTURES AND NOTED SITE FEATURES IN ALL AREAS AT A MINIMUM OF 2% SLOPE OR AS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS. ALL AREAS SHALL POSITIVELY DRAIN AND ALL ISLANDS SHALL BE CROWNED 1" IN HEIGHT PER 1' IN ISLAND WIDTH. Y 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE ALL TREE LOCATIONS AND THE PERIMETER OF SHRUB/PERENNIAL BEDS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND CONTACT THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL. FINAL LOCATION AND STAKING OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IN ADVANCE OF PLANTING. 10. IF CONFLICTS ARISE BETWEEN THE SIZE OF AREAS AND PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 11. WHERE PROVIDED, AREA TAKEOFFS AND PLANT QUANTITY ESTIMATES IN THE PLANT LIST ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DO THEIR OWN QUANTITY REMOVE CONTAINER OR TOP TAKE -OFFS FOR ALL PLANT MATERIALS AND SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS. IN CASE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, PLANS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER CALL -OUTS AND/OR THE PLANT LIST(S). THIRD OF BURLAP WRAP FROM B&B SHRUBS & 12. PLANTS ARE TO BE TYPICAL IN SHAPE AND SIZE FOR SPECIES. PLANTS PLANTED IN ROWS OR GROUPS SHALL BE MATCHED IN FORM. PLANTS SHALL NOT BE ROOT -BOUND OR REMOVE ALL TWINE FROM LOOSE IN THEIR CONTAINERS. HANDLE ALL PLANTS WITH CARE IN TRANSPORTING, PLANTING AND MAINTENANCE UNTIL INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE. FIELD COLLECTED MATERIAL ROOT BALL. PRUNE SHALL NOT BE USED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. DAMAGED OR DESICCATED ROOTS. 13. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, FERTILIZING, AS SPECIFIED, STAKING, WATERING AND ONE (1) YEAR PLANT WARRANTY FOR INSTALLED PLANT MATERIAL, SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL SET ROOTBALL ON TO THE PLANT ITEMS. COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE. 14. MUSHROOM COMPOST SHALL BE FINELY SCREENED, HOMOGENOUS, DECOMPOSED ORGANIC MATERIAL SUITABLE FOR HORTICULTURAL USE AS AVAILABLE FROM MIDWEST TRADING HORTICULTURAL SUPPLIES, INC. ST. CHARLES, IL 60174 (630) 365-1990 OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIX THOROUGHLY IN PLANT BED BEFORE INSTALLING PLANTS. LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO DIGGING. 2. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXISTING TREES FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL SHRUBS BEDS (EXISTING AND NEW) TO BE MULCHED WITH A 3 INCH MINIMUM LAYER OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. 4. ALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL BEDS TO BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES AND AMENDED WITH 4 INCHES OF ORGANIC MATERIAL. MULCH PLANTED ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL BEDS WITH 2 INCH DEPTH OF MINI NUGGETS. 5. PLANTING HOLES TO BE DUG A MINIMUM OF TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE SIZE OF THE ROOT BALL OF BOTH SHRUB AND TREE. BACK TO BE A MIX OF 4 PARTS TOPSOIL AND 1 PART ORGANIC SOIL CONDITIONER (IE. NATURE'S HELPER OR PRO MIX). BACKFILL AND TAMP BOTTOM OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING SO TOP OF ROOT BALL DOES NOT SETTLE BELOW SURROUNDING GRADE. 6. EXISTING GRASS IN PROPOSED PLANTING AREAS TO BE KILLED AND REMOVED AND AREA TO BE HAND RAKED TO REMOVE ALL ROCKS AND DEBRIS LARGER THAN 1 INCH IN DIAMETER PRIOR TO PLANTING SHRUBS. 7. ANY EXISTING GRASS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO BE FULLY REMOVED, REGRADED AND REPLACED. ALL TIRE MARKS AND INDENTIONS TO BE REPAIRED. 8. SOIL TO BE TESTED TO DETERMINE FERTILIZER AND LIME REQUIREMENTS AND DISTRIBUTED PRIOR TO LAYING SOD. 9. SOD TO BE DELIVERED FRESH (CUT LESS THAN 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ARRIVING ON SITE), LAID IMMEDIATELY, ROLLED, AND WATERED THOROUGHLY IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING. EDGE OF SOD IS TO BE "V" TRENCHED. 10. ALL CHANGES TO DESIGN OR PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS ARE TO BE AUTHORIZED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 11. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH ANSI Z60.1 THE -AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK -AND THE ACCEPTED STANDARDS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. 12. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL PLANTS INSTALLED FOR ONE FULL YEAR FROM DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE ALIVE AND AT A VIGOROUS RATE OF GROWTH AT THE END OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTS OF GOD OR VANDALISM. 13. ANY PLANT THAT IS DETERMINED DEAD, IN AN UNHEALTHY OR UNSIGHTLY CONDITION, LOST ITS SHAPE DUE TO DEAD BRANCHES OR OTHER SYMPTOMS OF POOR, NON -VIGOROUS GROWTH SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 14. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADDING A MIN OF 4" OF CLEAN FRIABLE TOPSOIL IN ALL PLANTING BEDS AND ALL GRASSED AREAS. GRADED AREAS TO BE HELD DOWN THE APPROPRIATE ELEVATION TO ACCOUNT FOR TOPSOIL. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIRED TOPSOIL CHARACTERISTICS. 15. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO MOUND ALL PARKING ISLANDS 6" - 10" W/T CLEAN FRIABLE TOPSOIL. 16. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SUBGRADE, GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS, VERIFY ELEVATIONS, UTILITY LOCATIONS, IRRIGATION, APPROVE TOPSOIL PROVIDED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OBSERVE THE SITE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE DONE. NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ANY UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS, AND WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL SUCH CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED AND ARE ACCEPTABLE TO THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 17. STAKE ALL EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS THIS SHEET. 18. REMOVE ALL STAKES AND GUYING FROM ALL TREES AFTER ONE YEAR FROM PLANTING. 19. WATER THOROUGHLY TWICE IN FIRST 24 HOURS AND APPLY MULCH IMMEDIATELY. 20. SITE TO BE 100% IRRIGATED IN ALL PLANTING BEDS AND GRASS AREA BY AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. SEE IRRIGATION PLAN L-2.0 FOR DESIGN. 21. ALL TREE PROTECTION DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBANCE, AND MAINTAINED UNTIL FINAL LANDSCAPING. 22. ALL TREE PROTECTION AREAS TO BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENTATION. 23. ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING TO BE INSPECTED DAILY, AND REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS NEEDED. 24. NO PARKING, STORAGE OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE TO OCCUR WITHIN TREE PROTECTION AREAS. on o 3 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS PART 1-GENERAL DESCRIPTION Provide trees, plants and ground covers as shown and specified. The work includes: 1. Soil preparation. 2. Trees, plants, and ground covers. 3. Planting mixes. 4. Mulch and Planting accessories. 5. Maintenance. 6. Decorative stone. Related Work: A. Irrigation System. QUALITY ASSURANCE Plant names indicated; comply with 'Standardized Plant Names` as adopted by the latest edition of the American Joint Committee of Horticultural Nomenclature. Names of varieties not listed conform generally with names accepted by the nursery trade. Provide stock true to botanical name and legibly tagged. Complywith sizing and gradingstandards of the latest edition of "American Standard for Nursery Stock'. A plant Shall be dimensioned as it stands in its natural position. All plants shall be nursery grown under climatic conditions similar to those in the locality of the project for a minimum of 2 years. Stock finished shall be at least the minimum size indicated, Larger stock is acceptable, at no additional cost, and providing that the larger plants Will riot be cut back to size indicated. Provide plants indicated by two measurements so that only a maximum of 25% are or the minimum size indicated and 75% are of the maximum size indicated. Before submitting his bid, the Contractor shall have investigated the sources of supply and satisfied himself that he can supply the listed plants in the size, variety and quality listed and specified. Failure to take this precaution will not relieve the Contractor from his responsibility for furnishing and installing all plant materials in strict accordance with the Contract Documents without additional cost to the Owner. Landscape Architect shall approve any substitutes of plant material or changes in plant material size prior to contractor submitting a bid. DELIVER, STORAGE AND HANDLING Take all precautions customary in good trade practice in preparing plants for moving. Workmanship that fails to meet the highest standards will be rejected. Spray deciduous plants in foliage with an approved'Anti-Desiccant" immediately after digging to prevent dehydration. Dig, pack, transport, and handle plants with care to ensure. protection against injury. inspection certificates required by law shall accompany each shipment invoice or order to stock. Protect all plants from drying out. If plants cannot be planted immediately upon delivery, property protect them with soil, wet peat moss, or in a manner acceptable to the Landscape Architect. Water heeled -in plantings daily. No plant shall be bound with rope or wire in a manner that could damage or break the branches. Cover plants transported on open vehicles with a protective covering to prevent windburn. Provide dry, friable, loose topsoil for planting bed mixes. Amend with 4 parts screened topsoil and 1 part organic material (i.e. Nature's Helper, Pro -Mix). Frozen or muddy topsoil is not acceptable. PROJECT CONDITIONS Protect existing utilities, paving, and other facilities from damage caused by landscape operations. A complete fist of plants, including a schedule of sizes, quantities, and other requirements is shown on the drawings. in the event that quantity discrepancies or material omissions occur in the plant materials list, the planting plans shall govern. The irrigation system will be installed prior to planting. Locate, protect and maintain the irrigation system during planting operations. Repair irrigation system components, damaged during planting operations, at the Contractor's expense - Do not begin landscape accessory work before. completion of final grading or surfacing. WARRANTY Warrant plant material to remain akve and be healthy, vigorous condition for a period of 1 year after completion and final acceptance of entire project. Replace, in accordance with the drawings and specifications, all plants that are dead or, are in an unhealthy or unsightly condition, and have lost their natural shape due to dead branches, or other causes due to the Contractor's negligence. The cost of such replacement(s) is at the Contractors expense. Warrant all replacement plants for 1 year after installation.. Warranty shall not include damage m loss of trees, plants or ground covers caused by fires, floods, freezing rains, lightning storms or winds over 75 miles per hour, winter kill caused by extreme cold and severe winter conditions not typical of planting area; acts of vandalism or negligence on a part of the Owner. Remove and immediately replace all plants, found to be unsatisfactory during the initial planting installation, Maintain plant material and lawns until final acceptance is made. ACCEPTANCE Inspection to determine of planted areas will be made by the Owners representative. 1. Planted areas will be accepted provided all requirements, including maintenance, have been complied withand plant materials are alive and in a healthy, vigorous condition. Upon acceptance, the Contractor shall commence the specified plant maintenance. CODES, PERMITS AND FEES Obtain any necessary permits for this Section of Work and pay any fees required for permits. The entre installation shall fully_ ooriiply with all local and state laws and ordinances, and with all established codes applicable thereto. PART2-PRODUCTS MATERIALS Plants: Provide typical of their species or variety; with normal, densely developed branches and vigorous, fibrous root systems. Provide only sound, healthy, vigorous plants free from defects, disfiguring knots, sun scald injuries, frost cracks, abrasions of the bark, plant diseases, insect eggs, boxers, and all forms of infestation. All plants shall have a fully developed form without voids and open spaces. Plants held on storage will be rejected if they show signs of growth during storage. 1, Dig balled and plants wrapped with burlap with firm, natural balls of earth of sufficient diameter anddepth to encompass the fibrous and feeding root system necessary for full recovery of the plant. Provide ball sizes complying with the latest edition of the "American Standard for Nursery Stock'. Cracked or mushroomed balls are not acceptable. 2, Container- grown stock: Grown in a container for sufficient length of time for the root system to have developed to hold its soil together, firm and whole. A. Noplants shall be loose in the container. B. Container stock shall riot be pot bourns. 3. Provide treespeciesthat mature at heights over 25 feet with a single main. trunk. Trees that have the main trunk forming a "Y' shape are not acceptable. 4, Plants planted in rows shall be matched in form. 5. Plants larger than those specified in the plant list may be used when acceptable to the Landscape Architect. If the use of larger plants is acceptable, increase the spread of roots or root ball in proportion to the size of the plant. 6. The height of the trees. measured from the crown of the roots to the top of the top branch, shall not be less than the minimum size designated in the plant list. 7. No pruning wounds shall be present with a diameter of more than 1' and such wounds must show vigorous bark on all edges. S. Evergreen trees shall be branched to the ground or as specified in plant list. 9. Shrubs and small plants shall meet the requirements for spread and height indicated in the plant list. The measurements for height stall be taken from the ground level to the height of the top of the plant and not the longest branch. • Single stemmed or thin plants will not be accepted. • Side branches shall be generous, wed -twigged, and the plant as a whole well -bushed to the ground. • Plants shall be in a moist, vigorous ocire ition,. free from dead wood,bruises, or other root of branch injuries. ACCESSORIES Topsoil for Planting Beds: Fertile: friable, natural topsoil of loamy character, without admixture of subsoil material,. obtained from a well -drained arable site, reasonably free from day, lumps, coarse sands, stones, roots,. sticks, and other foreign materials, with acidity range of between pH 6.0 and 6.8. Topsoil to be at a minimum depth of 4'. Mulch: See plans for type of mulch to be used. • Hardwood: 6 month old well rotted double shredded native hardwood bark mulch not larger than 4" in length and W in width, free of wood chips and sawdust. install minimum depth of 3'. • Pine Straw: Pine straw to be fresh harvest, free of debris, bright in color. Bales to be wired and tightly bound. Needlesto be dry. Install minimum depth of 3'. • River Rock: Rock type to be tan to yellow -brown washed river rock. 1" - 3" in size. Install In shrub beds to an even depth of 3'. Stone to be used around base of flagpole and flagpole spotlight. GuyingiStaking: 1. Arbortle: Green (or white) staking and guying material to be flat, woven, polypropylene material. %' wide 900 lb. break strength. Arbortie shall be fastened to stakes in a manner which permits tree movement and supports the tree. Tree Wrap: Standard waterproofed tree wrapping paper, 2-112' wide, made of 2 layers of crepe Draft paper weighing not less than 30 lbs: per ream, cemented together with asphalt. Twine: Tyro -ply jute material. PART 3 - EXECUTION INSPECTION Examine proposed planting areas and conditions of installation. Do not start planting work until unsatisfactory conditions are corrected. PREPARATION Planting shall be performed only by experienced workmen familiar with planting procedures under the supervision of a qualified supervisor. Locate plants as indicated or as approved in the field after staking by the Contractor. If obstructions are encountered that are not shown on the drawings, do not proceed vrith planting operations until alternate plant locations have been selected. Excavate circular plant pits with vertical sides, except for plants specifically indicated to be planted in beds.. Provide shmb pits at least 12" greater than the diameter of the root system and 24' greater for trees.. Depth of pit shall accommodate the root system. Provide undisturbed sub grade to hold mot ball at nursery grade as shown on the drawings. Provide pre -mixed planting mixture for use around the balls and roots of theplants consisting of 4 parts screened topsoil and 1 part organic material. Add plant fertilizer per manufactumes recommendation for each cubic yard of mixture. Provide pre -mixed ground cover bed planting mixture consisting of 4 parts screened topsoil. to 1 partpeat moss and plant fertilizer per manufacturers recommendation for each cubic yard of mixture. DRAINAGE TEST Randomly select a representative number of shrub and tree plant pits in each shrub planting area and test for drainage prior to planting. Fill each selected plant pit with water and let stand for twenty-four (24) hours. Do not proceedwith planting where drainage problems are apparent. Report to the Owner's Representative areas that do not drain within twenty-four (24).hours. INSTALLATION Set plant material in the planting pit to proper grade and alignment Set plants upright. plumb, and faced to give the best appearance or relationship to each other or adjacent structure. Set plant material 2'- 3" above the finish grade. No filling will be permitted around trunks or stems. Backfill the pit with topsoil mix and excavated material. Do not use frozen. or muddy matures for backfilling. Form a ring of soft around the edge of each planting pit to retain water. After bailed and wrapped in budap plants are set, muddle planting soil mixture around bases of balls and fill all voids. 1. Remove all burlap, ropes, and wires from the top 2i3 of the root ball Space ground cover plants In accordance with indicated dimensions. Adjust spacing as necessary to evenly fill planting bed with indicated quantity of plants. Plant to within 12" of the trunks of trees and shrubs within planting bed and to within 6" of edge of bed. Mulching: 1. Mulch tree and shrub planting pits and shrub beds with required (see landscape plan) mulching material 3" deep immediately after planting. Thoroughly water mulched areas_ After watering, rake mulch to provide a uniform finished surface. Wrapping, guying, staking: 1, Inspect trees for injury to trunks, evidence of insect infestation, and improper pruning before wrapping. 2. Wrap trunks of all trees spirally from bottom to top with specified tree wrap and secure in place. A. Overlap Ys the width of the tree wrap strip and cower the trunk from the ground to the haight of the second branch. B. Secure tree wrap in place with twine wound spirally downward in the opposite direction, bed around the tree in at least 3 places in addition to the top and bottom. 3. Staking/Guying: • Stakeiguy all trees immediately after lawn sodding operations and prior to acceptance. • Stake deciduous trees 3" caliper and less. Stake evergreen trees under V-0' tall. • Guy deciduous trees over 3' caliper. Guy evergreen trees 8'-0" tall and over. 4, Al work shall be acceptable to the Owner. Pruning: Prune deciduous trees and evergreens only to remove broken or damaged branches - Decorative Stone: (where indicated on landscape plan) • Install weed control barrier over sub -grade prior to installing stone. Lap 6" on all sides. Place stone without damaging weed barrier. • Arrange stones for best appearance. MAINTENANCE The Contractor snail provide as a separate bid, maintenance for a period of f year after final acceptance of the project landscaping. The Contractor must be able to provide continued maintenance if requested by the Owner or provide the name of a reputable landscape contractor who can provide maintenance. Maintenance shall include mowing, fertilizing, mulching, pruning, cultivation, weeding, watering, and application of appropriate insecticides and fungicides necessary to maintain plants and lawns free of insects and disease. 1. Re -set settled plants to proper grade and position. Restore planting saucer and adjacent material and remove dead material. 2. Tighten andrepairguy wires and stakes as required. Remove all stakes and guy wires after 1 year, 3. Correct defective work as soon as possible after deficiencies become apparent and weather and season permit, 4. Water trees, plants and ground cover beds within the first 24 hours of initial planting, and not less than twice per week until final acceptance. CLEANING Perform cleaning during installation of the work and upon completion of the work, Removefrom site all excess materials, soils, debris, and equipment Repair damage resulting from planting operations, Sweep parking and walks clean of dirt and debris. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS STANDARDS Ali landscape maintenance services shalt be performed by trained personnel using current, acceptable horticultural practices. Ali work shall be performed in a manner that maintains the original intent of the landscape design. All chemical applications shalt be performed in accordance with current county, state and federal laws, using EPA registered materials and methods of application. These applications shall be performed under the supervision of a Licensed Cerfified applicator. APPROVALS Any work performed in addition to that which is outlined in the contract shall only be done upon. written approval by the Owner's Representative (General Manager of the restaurant). Ali seasonal color selections shaft be approved.. by the General Manager prior to ordering and installation.. SOIL TESTING The landscape contractor shall perform soil tests as needed to identify imbalances or deficiencies causing plant material decline. The owner shall be notified of the recommendation for approval, and the necessary corrections made at an additional cost to the owner. PH Range 5,0-7.0 e.0-7.0 Organic Matter :>1.5% .6% Magnesium (Mg) IW+bsJacm 100+•16sJasra Phosphorus(P205i 150+esJacm 150,Hts.facre, Potassium tK20) 120+lbalacra 120+Ibsiacre Soluble saes/ Not to amused 900ppmJ1.5 mmhordcm Not to exceed 750ppmf0.75 mmnaucm conductivity in soil, not to exceed 1400 ppmr2<5 in ma; rot to exceed 2000 ppm/2.0 mmhoarcm in Ngh organic mix mmhnwern in high organic ma For unusual soil condilions, the following optional tests ate recommended with levels not to exceed: Boron 3 Pounds per acre Manganese 50 pounds per ale Potassium (K20) 450 pounds per acre sodium 20 pounds per am WORKMANSHIP During landscape maintenance operations, all areas Shall be kept neat and clean. Precautions shalt be taken to avoid damage to existing structures. All work shall be performed in a safe manner to the operators, the occupants and any pedestrians. Upon completion of maintenance operations, all debris and waste material shall be cleaned up and removed from the site, unless provisions have been granted by the owner to use on -site trash receptacles. Any damage to the landscape. the structure, or the irrigation system caused by the landscape contractor shall be repaired by the landscape contractor without charge to the owner. TURF GENERAL CLEAN UP Prior to mowing, all trash, sticks, and other unwanted debris shall be removed from lawns, plant beds,. and paved areas, MOWING Warm season grasses (i.e- Bermuda grass) shall. be maintained at a height of 1" to 2" during the growing season. Cool season grasses, including blue grass, tall fescue, perennial ryegrass, etc.., shall be maintained at height of 2' to 3" in spring and fall. From June through September, mowing height shall be maintained at no less than 3. The mowing operation includes trimming around all obstacles,. raking excessive grass clippings and removing debris from walks, curbs, and parking areas. Caution.: Weed eaters should NOT be used around trees becauseof potential damage to the bark. EDGING Edging of all sidewalks, curbs and other paved areas shall be performed once every other mowing. Debris from the edging operations shall be removed and the areas swept dean. Caution shall be used to avoid flying debris. LIMING & FERTILIZING A. sod test shall be taken to determine whether an application of limestone to late fall is necessary. If limestone is required, the landscape contractor shalt specify the rate, obtain approval from the owner and apply it at an additional cost. A unit price for timing of turf shall accompany the bid based ona rate of 50 pounds per 1000 square feet. Lawn areas shall be fertilized as shown in Service. Schedule (Appendix A), Fertilizer shall be applied in areas based on the existing turf species. LAWN WEED CONTROL: HERBICIDES Pre and post -emergent (soil -applied) herbicide to be applied as per Service Schedule (Appendix A), Selection and proper use of herbicides shall be thelandscape contractors responsibility. All chemical applications shall be performed under the supervision of a Licensed Certified Applicator, Read the label prior to applying any chemical. INSECT & DISEASE CONTROL FOR TURF The contractor shall be responsible for monitoring the site conditions on each visit to determine if any insect pest or disease problems exist. The contractor shall identify the insert pest or disease, as well as the host plant, and then consul the most current edition of the Cooperative Extension Service's "Commercial Insecticide Recommendation for Turf" for control. The licensed applicator shall be familiar with the label provided for the selected product prior to application. Inspection and treatment to control insect pests shall be included in the contract price. TREES, SHRUBS, & GROUND COVER PRUNING All ornamental trees, shrubs and ground cover shall be pruned when appropriate to remove dead or damaged branches, develop the natural shapes. Do not shear trees or shrubs, if previous maintenance practice has been to shear and ball, then a natural shape will be restored gradually. Pruning Guidelines: 1.. Prune those that flower before the end of June immediately after flowering. Flower buds develop during the previous growing season. Fall, winter or spring pruning would reducethe spring flowering display. 2, Prune those that flower in summer or autumn in winter or spring before new growth begins, since these plants develop flowers on new growth. 3. Delay pruning plants grown for ornamental fruits, such as cotoneasters, pyracanthas and vibumums. 4.. Holdes and other evergreens- may be pruned during winter in order to use their branches for seasonal decoration. However, severe pruning of evergreens should be done to early spring only. 5. Broadleaf evergreen shrubs shall be hand -pruned to maintain their natural appearance after thenew growth hardens off. 6. Hedges or shrubs that require shearing to maintain a formal appearance shall be pruned as required. Dead wood shall be removed from sheared plants before the firs shearing of the season. 7. Conifers shalt be pruned, if required, according to their genus. A. Yews, junipers, hemlocks,. arborvitae, and false -cypress may be pruned after new growth has hardened off in late summer. If severe pruning Is necessary, it must be done in early spring. B. Firs and spruces may be lightly pruned in late summer, fall, or winter after completing growth, Leave side buds. Never cut central leader. C. Pines may be lightly pruned in early June by reducing candles. B. Groundcover shall be edged and pruned as needed to contain it within its borders. 9. Thinning: Remove branches and water sprouts by cutting them back to their point of origin on parent stems. This method results in a more open plant, without stimulating excessive growth. Thinning is used on crepe myrtles, lilacs, viburnums, smoke bush, etc. 10. Renewal pruning: Remove oldest branches of shrub at ground, leaving the younger, more vigorous branches. Also remove weak stems. On overgrown plants, this method may be best done over a. three- year period. Renewal pruning may be used on abelia, forsythia, deutzia, spiraea, etc. Plants overhanging passageways and parking areas and damaged plants shall be pruned as. needed. Shade trees that cannot be adequately pruned from the ground shall notbe included in the Maintenance Contract A certified arborist under a separate contract shall perform this type of work. SPRING CLEANUP Plant beds shalt receive a general cleanup before fertilizing and mulching. Cleanup includes removing debris and trash from beds and cutting back herbaceous perennials left standing through winter, e,g. ornamental grasses, Sedum Autumn Joy. FERTILIZING For trees, the rate of fertilization depends on the tree species, tree vigor, area available for fertilization, and growth stage of the tree. Mature specimens benefit from fertilization every 3 to 4 years; younger trees shall be fertilized more often during rapid growth stages. The current recommendation is based on the rate of 1000 square feet of area under the tree to be fertilized, For deciduous trees, 2 to 6 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet; for narrow -leaf evergreens, 1 to 4 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet for broadleaf evergreens, 1 to 3 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet. The current recommendation is based on the rate of 1000 square feet of area under the tree to be fertilized. For deciduous trees, 2 to 6 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet; for narrow -leaf evergreens, 1 to 4 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet; for broadleaf evergreens, 1 to 3 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet. Shrubs and groundcover shall be top -dressed with compost 1" deep, or fertilized once in March with 10.6-4 analysis fertilizer at therate of 3 pounds per 100 square feet of bed area. Ericaceous material shall be fertilized with an ericaceous fertilizer at the manufacturer's recommendation rate. If plants are growing poorly, a sat sample should be taken. MULCHING Where necessary, all tree and shrub beds will be prepared and mulched, unless already mulched with compost, to a depth of 3' - 4' annually with quality mulch. Bed preparation shall include removing all weeds, cleaning up said bed, edging and cultivating decayed mulch into the soil. Debris from edging is to be removed from beds where applicable. if deemed necessary, a pre -emergent herbicide may be applied to the soil to inhibit the growth of future weeds. Organically maintained. gardens shall not receive any pre -emergent herbicides. Mulch in excess of 4"- will be removed from the bed areas. SPECIAL CARE shall be taken in the mulching operation not to over -mulch or cover the base of trees and shrubs. This can be detrimental to the health of the plants. WEEDING All beds shall be weeded on a continuous basis throughout the growing season to maintain a neat appearance at all times. Pre -emergent (soil -applied) and post -emergent (foliar-applied) herbicides shall be used where and when applicable and in accordance with the product's label. INSECT & DISEASE CONTROL: TREES, SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER The landscape contractor shall be responsible for monitoring the landscape site on a regular basis. The monitoring frequency shall be monthly except for growing season, which will be every other week. Trained personnel shall monitor for plant damaging insect activity, plant pathogenic diseases and potential cultural problems in the landscape. The pest or cultural problem will be identified under the supervision of the contractor. For plant damaging insects and mites identified in the landscape, the contractor shall consult and follow the recommendations of the most current edition of the state Cooperative Service publication on insect control on landscape plant material. Plant pathogenic disease problems identified by the contractor that can be resolved by pruning or physical removal of damaged plantparts will be performed as part of the contract. For an additional charge, plant pathogenic diseases that can be resolved throughproperly timed applications of fungicides shall be made when the owner authorizes it. If the contractor notes an especially insect -or disease -prone plant species in the landscape, he/she will suggest replacement with a more pest -resistant cuitivar or species that is consistent with the intent of the landscape design. NOTE: For identification of plant -damaging insects and mites, a reference textbook that can be used is insects that feed on Trees and Shrubs by Johnson and Lyon, Comstock Publishing Associates. For plan pathogenic diseases, two references are suggested: Scouting and Controlling bloody Omamenta/ Diseases in Landscapes and Nurseries, authorized by Gary Moorman, published by Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences, and Diseases of Trees and Shrubs by Sinclair and Lyon, published by Comstock Publishing Press. TRASH REMOVAL 'This landiacape, carlbaa6Ot shwa Maximalassh ewrnaa shrub and grakmdxd`0sW bye Will each Visit - LEAF REMDVAi Aa fatten leaveisshad be remgved from the site fro Nevember and ari in Decembef, aaeques;eu' h9a the Saavner, bite fanu#ssaPe uorilracfar at arrexfegtepnal Met lib the awraaa shall perfamr supp7ereaentaf leaf seraxovafs. WINTER CLEAN-UP 'rtna pra}ept sdaa8 reaes'aa a geraerat eiaani+p anae durasG ea.^t's of Stir wri»ter nxxtttis, e,e., Jawbrq, Febrexary, eras Mrw�r. Clean-up aaciudes: Guilt cutha and parkizsg ane.:s Rearx"ngals trash and urmal detttt5 Turni\"1g eext&a'x alone rleuwssary ta+spe,Ltion of grounds SEASONAL COLOR: PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND BULBS Tn<etrstf31a4ras dtparenestais,.luusuats, acid Limbs, uaalass specified ilcr+ta rt sAssa b$ rcvi$taed•vsfrl tine cteaier,. anon if apresaiesi- ins#alisal and ird$ed to the awa$r. SEASONAL COLOR MAINTENANCE Peresrealleatiorl nl Bulbus 1. After Rowe e+g; but off spent tthwrar heeds. 2; Agow Wawa rrf datTtdIN and ItYaar4tu to fitsf ova for Six weeks aftf frcveers have faded'. Girt off At rase: 3. Allow team ert other bulbs D3 yellow rzalura3y and often cut off at bees:. 4. Applyfarliiezer after tbawarirg in sprang, pass4ily again in W. Apply 10-10-10 at era ?tube at:2 pounds per 1 We eWwe feet,: or tap -dress wiar carapast i- deep. Fall tettixlizatsan with a buso fsavtalzier w nautchasg vii'ei 1'rxx 920wQVtis rayfionai. Flower Rotation: 1.. Bulbs: Remsove the entirepfant and bulb after aowes have: flsdesl or at. ire direcbrer oil the ownex, and irettvtl near plarfs if ck ded in comrsiat 2. Stag Annuaber Fa#Pfatds: a. i9aald heading:-Ykleke and renuTr,+e u�ad gasses offaralx..ats as neoassartr. tot. F$rtgirirag Swsaner AnrxrBis: FerLSze usar>a one ar Loexl .raettwds; A�aiy a stew -release feriidzer to May talk9wirt) nanufactU s r$mr<anendatians. A tsoaster 5nebe as. itT->d- tC3 M97 be necessaty. in ta1asalmrnes. {s?r, apply fcv6dzattefls oi:4-%:P-:Yt w,n�r-iatvb.�z feaNl�ivs< nslbr tic 2 poundpoundS of pier 100latices of v Het rnOnthdy; Or mach. With rat I'deep. a, Ri mavat if la& rrianisare to be nistalted. sunsmix, arfnuads shad be left in the tirmsnd ur ld the fuss klli lg feast and then reeanved, unless ath<erwsse directed by the owner: I'Marl f. ibrsBr xix"'uat, irs�idation., if a firne�caaeasa•C fiertifozzr has:. F>e$.n 6-,rxe�rcarated dun rig p➢arff»staliabars: am ow.ee kfier irr .^reed be ap<pliaif rho e-released ased enil n. 2. The fad0iee*ig yeas: a: Fsrtilizrs pErenrsia&s with astart �lerSHzararany 5096 orgarfet'aafilizer, oeerauiclt parefasiails with campasi V deers, ix Gut al dedduaus perennials flush Ia the ground by March 1, ir6rw's was not Maine the PmN,Zwus fat, to allow new growth to davtiop freely. a. Mu.ich eha pervirtn P teed awe in lady wring III f"-: de g" If sod is babad.In fate tat,: ae-enriiiih lightly after grouvrd to truzan IQ pi tem penvirradi, cl. inspectfor insect a disease PraWnsrrs ciri paa nrsau. k91mibar and ccar" slugs roc hostas and iigularras. Powdery rnfldew on phlox, nsom rdIas, and astem can be prevented with Properly &md. krngloades ar use of Q:eaaSa-re515fakii vamlies. e. Weed pereoraaibeda.speci'WEEDING'abmve- f, Prunes t+rarlcb,r,a spa,ores to cricsease ciemsiy. Ce4 aray, tare flowenrvg stems stew 3sk>3ming, OR neat receive the ialsage.. 3. "be followers;) fail cut tiar:k deFara alrn clear parrs milesss ansbucted to retain for winter pnhenisi. a.g.. Sedum Aunorto Joy and xnamenta' grasses. 4, Lannptelm Gave: a. Divide pleuras amnt averwaoad %a space pn ided. Gkvicle au^cc%dsn9 to the spe,cses. Sarnia need frequent dxvwritti, e.g. 251mis and yarrlm very tiw0 yaarsi: •aeler rainy it v . $ g. paciraes, bastes, arn3 asbabe. b. For de3aitarl inilionmistionregvrding dhe osaf afspecifaa p$renraats, refer to Aft AbmI PkrQsxuaits by i]rtha; Sareraraais: Nakv to, meat, wow, and E*y by Pamela Harper arld Frederick .!' faGardy; Hp SoAs Puloish er, Hwha eo a Fei r raai Piantic A- Triva"e pre ffiei . flier l6cafiar:I;. Cullum and G4,ueer A,Jtrrlsutea by, AILa-i Akrmi}age, gtitpeas Pu& LLC. iRRIGATION MAINTENANCE 7. Fail rne,Aanavaar shall ifosudie form apt tSm'uted to).i+a#MN the sys>han by rriansrai gravitational drairss ar use sroorrrpres-sect aa..(Wanterize sys*mA 2. Spring roaiMsteaanae shag .4wwclefoul tuna:lftl ta1'aie. dclSRng of as rnarsrn4 drain sabres; OmPeEison Brut realigriment#aS heads, operations cdrerh+9est: esctn sxanefo, proper operation, inspection and art. s ,lent of vorebraller and fun l rnes 3. Inspect. irrigation systern components chunnig performance of regul� mainterrienas items. 4. Tesx Initiation system orate each oncinth during the grawth srascin by cytivra and inspecreng each zorve. 5. Reset cry.'•9e tiarses as riecesiwivir far seasonal a`awnazs a. Artust sprayat esa h Pop -Lip head to: ensure all Ptw*fV mateAW s as Voted, and that no: aver spray acucrs.raata pB'vernenfl, oe."ng w vetades SUNiRAARY OF MAINTENANCE LAWN MAit1TE"NICE 1. Soul analysis patiarxna+# an i ,alty to detemxim pH. B pit Lkaes net W VAhiri specified rwxge, adjust acco,rder>a to soil last.: reaolmmersdafons_ 2. lone di f, pmpw "If anct pH levels a the sat to provide err a-muaaanen4 ooaducive, to turf viiabty tar rnai season gasses.. 3, M w weirs and add season al a nVo4w basis and as Mao it and w:e0W tktales. RaTflaue not more than the top 13 of leaf biadr>.. Cippillas on paved and bell areas cull be removed, 4.. Aerate team sea&w turf areas: to rnasirrtairi tnh stacriards of si. f ap igerar og, 5. AWV Pge erdto tuaf In two applications in early February aid early April to ex iced barrier., b Awy past exnar'glnt as rid b comset weei 7. Mectanicalki edge aubs and wat al 8. Ap;*,y dpi%r iecbire hertuckle, to rxwhi°red bed aromas:and psveanent and remove excessri*miary to maa"ntandean defined beds. TREE,:-ROUNDL"C ER, AND SHRUB BED MAINTE'KANCE 5. Prune skins m, trees and grourrdcr ar as erxsX fns, hisakhy growth and create a natural appearance. ;, Mu»r w be aPFI 'din Fatvuary:3rFarc3r wftr a half rate it ta0. samsmerta tap crass_ 3. "y Pre-erriergaaf t,esaiciortes in February and April, 4, Manualweed rxxnbsot to maartfain clean bled apearance, 5 Apply ftalgiades =6 tnseeboides as need d to can fret Inseft end diseasa, 6:. Ormf lentaF shnabs, bees and groundorvem to be feAtized lhxree (3) twroaes per year with a balanced material WanuarylFebnaary, .AppinfWay,. and Oicfiaberr'Novenvise:r) 7. Edfle all ntutched tom. B. Remove all War mod debris. raEf1ERALMAMTEWCE 1. Rerraave all aaan-made debris,.bkm edges:. 2. Ressove leaves as per Service: Schedule (Appendix: A� 3: Impact grounds ore a monttt8y basis andschedule Irespedacn+vith Unit Operator- PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - INITIAL SCALE: 1 0=20'-0" "41", If 8 FIXTURE HEIGHT (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) LIGHTING LOSS FACTOR C 9' 1.0 Oc 22'6" 1.0 GO 25'6" 1.0 OD1 256" 1.0 OD2 25'6" 1.0 OH 9' 1.0 OL 9' 1.0 OK 6' 1.0 .0-PI QlaefeA 5200 Buffington Rd. Atlanta Georgia, 30349-2998 Revisions: Mark Date By 0 Mark Date By 0 Mark Date By 0 Seal }� P • � m O Vi —a�w A(D ' o W i `� n WZ �0ocO < � � v V 1-0 1!Y4 1"t001 41 i •' Z 61�NN �� m� ;moo � cn O f0 0 G O Off Ol U N 6 Z ne -r--_ Ua`ao� xNmv O�j Jx G Rimwbi STORE #3815 S13 CUSTOM 445 W 79TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEET TITLE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - INITIAL VERSION: ISSUE DATE:03/17/16 Job No. : 16-1459 Store :03840 Date .03.17.16 Drawn By KP Checked By: EU Sheet ES2.1 SF: 1.00 KP JN: H:\16009. CHANHASSEN FN:50-03840-EOS2.1 WB 62 DELIVERY 15.00 48.00 4.00 WB-62 Tractor Width Trailer Width Tractor Track Trailer Track 19.50 feet 8.00 Lock to Lock Time : 6.0 8.50 Steering Angle : 28.4 8.00 Articulating Angle : 70.0 8.50 FIRETRUCK 43.00 7.00 22.00 Aerial Fire Truck feet Width 8.50 Track 8.50 Lock to Lock Time 6.0 Steering Angle 33.3 LARGE PICK-UP TRUCK 20.58 3.08 13.17 Pickup Truck Super Duty feet Width 6.66 Track 6.00 Lock to Lock Time 6.0 Steering Angle 40.0