Loading...
CAS-07_2017-07 MISSION HILLS SENIOR HOUSING 1 OF 2MISSION HILLS SEN HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 r PROJECT TEAM OWNER HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT 1-1550 HEMLOCK AVENUE LAKBVtiL.L.E, MN 55044 CONTACT: MIKE HOAGBERG PHONE: (952)3-18-4386 CONTRACTOR ENGELSMA CONSTRUCTION, INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5542-7 CONTACT: JEFF EN6EL5MA PHONE: (763) 536-9200 ARCHITECT SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, ING. 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MN 5543-7 CONTACT: ERIG REINERS, AIA PHONE: (952) 996-9662 CIVIL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 59429 BROOKLYN BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55429 CONTACT: KEITH MATTE, PE PHONE: ("163) 843-0446 LAND5CAPE ARCHITECT CONFLUENCE 550 N THIRD STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 CONTACT: TERRY MINARIK, PLA, A5LA PHONE: (612) 333-3-702 5TRUCTURAL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 59429 BROOKLYN BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55429 CONTACT: TINA WYFFEL5, PE PHONE: (163) 543-0420 5URVEYOR: SUNDE LAND SURVEYING 9001 EAST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY SUITE #115 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420 GONTAGT: LENNY CARLSON PHONE: (952) 551-2455 PROJECT IMAGE ---.---...-........... _........ _...-_....- _.-.-.-.. MEMORY CARE UNIT SUMMARY UNIT NAME 06PM;7Y _ SQUARE FOOTAGE_ MG-1* 1 485 SF MG 2 1 439 SF 504 5F .- MG-4 ,. 1 _....-__-__ -399 5F .__.-... MG 5 1 ..................... 460 SF MG-6 j1 460 5F- MG-11 408-- Mc-8 I. 1.-_. 512 5F *ACCESSIBLE UNIT EXTENDED CARE UNIT 5UMMARY UNIT NAME QUANTITY SQUARE FOOTAGE -- -- - 4?2 SF -- ----- -._.-......._ EC-2* 1 42-15F EC-3* -- --- - 504 SF - - - --------- ---- __. 5045F...... EG_5;----- EG-6• 1 ._...-.-.-...._ 510 5F EC_7 --- 1 - 445 SF- - - - EG-8* 1 444 5F -'TOTALS: 8---- - --- - - - - -- *ACCESSIBLE UNIT OR LIVING UNIT SUMMARY UNIT SUMMARY 7 . ..... -__ ----- - UNIT NAME QUANTITY FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR FOURTH FLOOR SQUARE FOOTAGE 5A 3 O j 1 504 5F 56* 5'11 5F 1A ..........3 �4- ' - 125 5� _ - - 1 B ----- - - -- 3 --- - O .. _ .. ...- -1 1 . 803 5F i 16 11 O 3 14 .4- .--- - --- - 658 SF 10' 5 0 1 2 2 -752 5F 1+A --- 4 1.9865F- -- - -- --- 1+B.-. ..._. - �- - - -- --- 1 �3 3 .. ........... ._..... 9105F. 1+G* 2 O O 1 - 1- 9TT SF 1+D 12 10 0 1552 5F 1+E 11 10 0 11.055 SF 1 1 2 2 1,019 5� tw 3 9 LOCATION MAP 41 4.1 E +3' Discipline] SHEET NAME v GENERAL GENERAL A0.0 ITITLE SHEET 7 PLAT PLAT PLAT IPLAT 10 SURVEY SURVEY 15URVEY SURVEY Q CIVIL CIVIL 0000 DEMOLITION AND ER0510N CONTROL PLAN O CIVIL C100 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 O CIVIL C101 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 O CIVIL C102 IRRIGATION AREA PLAN 6- CIVIL C200 UTILITY PLAN O CIVIL C201 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILES O CIVIL C202 STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES O CIVIL C203 STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES O CIVIL G204 STORM 5ENER PLAN AND PROFILES O CIVIL G300 PAVING AND GEOMETRIC PLAN O CIVIL C301 TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT PLAN O OWIL C400 CIVIL DETAILS SHEET O CIVIL C401 CIVIL DETAILS SHEET O CIVIL C402 ICIVIL DETAILS SHEET 10 CIVIL C500 15TORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN O LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE L100 SITE PLAN O LANDSCAPE L400 REFERENCE PLAN O LANDSCAPE L401 LANDSCAPE PLAN O LANDSCAPE L402 LANDSCAPE PLAN - SOUTH ENLARGEMENT O LANDSCAPE L500 51TE DETAILS O LANDSCAPE L501 PLANTING DETAILS O STRUCTURAL STRUCTURAL 51.0 TITLE SHEET STRUCTURAL 52.03 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN - AREA A STRUCTURAL 52.04 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN - AREAS B 4G STRUCTURAL 52.05 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN - AREAS D 4 E STRUCTURAL 52.15 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREA A STRUCTURAL 52.14 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREA5 B 4 C STRUCTURAL 52.15 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - AREAS D 4 E STRUCTURAL 52.20P FIRST FLOOR PRECAST LOADING PLAN STRUCTURAL 52.29 SECOND FLOOR FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREA A STRUCTURAL 52.24 SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREA5 B 4 G STRUCTURAL 52.25 ROOF FRAMING PLAN AREAS D 4 E STRUCTURAL 52.55 THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREA A STRUCTURAL 52.54 THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREAS B 4 G STRUCTURAL 52.45 FOURTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREA A STRUCTURAL 52.44 FOURTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREAS B 4 G STRUCTURAL 52.55 ROOF FRAMING PLAN - AREA A STRUCTURAL 52.54 ROOF FRAMING PLAN - AREAS B 4 G STRUCTURAL 53.0 SECTIONS AND DETAILS STRUCTURAL 53.1 SECTIONS AND DETAILS 5TRUCTURAL 55.2 SECTIONS AND DETAILS STRUCTURAL 55.3 SECTIONS AND DETAILS STRUCTURAL 55.4 SECTIONS AND DETAILS STRUCTURAL 55.5 SCHEDULES AND DETAILS STRUCTURAL 54.0 SCHEDULES AND DETAILS STRUCTURAL 54.1 SCHEDULES AND DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL AO.1 GORE SUMMARY ARCHITECTURAL AO.2 CODE PLAN - BASEMENT ARCHITECTURAL A0.3 CODE PLAN - FIRST FLOOR ARCHITECTURAL AO.4 CODE PLAN - SECOND FLOOR ARCHITECTURAL AO.5 GODS PLAN - THIRD FLOOR ARCHITECTURAL A0.6 CODE PLAN - FOURTH FLOOR ARCHITECTURAL A0.9 ASSEMBLY TYPES ARCHITECTURAL A1.00 ARCHITECTURAL 51TE PLAN O ARCHITECTURAL A2.00 BASEMENT LEVEL OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL A2.01 MAIN LEVEL OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL A2.02 SECOND LEVEL OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL A2.03 THIRD LEVEL OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL A2.04 FOURTH LEVEL OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL A2.05 ROOF PLAN ARCHITECTURAL A2.10 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A2.11 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN - AREAS B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A2.12 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A2.13 FIRST FLOOR - AREAS B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A2.14 FIRST FLOOR - AREAS D 4 E ARCHITECTURAL A2.15 SECOND FLOOR - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A2.16 SECOND FLOOR - AREAS B 4 C ARCHITECTURAL A2.1-1 THIRD FLOOR - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A2.18 THIRD FLOOR - AREAS B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A2.19 FOURTH FLOOR - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A2.20 FOURTH FLOOR - AREAS B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A2.30 AREA A 4 D FIRST FLOOR - MISCELLANEOUS ENLARGED PLANS ARCHITECTURAL A2.31 AREA A 4 G FIRST FLOOR - MISCELLANEOUS ENLARGED PLANS ARCHITECTURAL A2.32 AREA A - MISCELLANEOUS ENLARGED PLANS ARCHITECTURAL A2.33 AREA A - MISCELLANEOUS ENLARGED PLANS ARCHITECTURAL A2.34 AREA B FIRST FLOOR - DAYCARE WE5T ARCHITECTURAL A2.35 AREA B FIRST FLOOR - DAYCARE EAST ARCHITECTURAL A2.40 UNITS 5A AND 55 ARCHITECTURAL A2.41 UNITS 1A AND 115 ARCHITECTURAL A2.42 UNITS 1C AND 1D ARCHITECTURAL A2.43 UNIT51 1+A AND 1+B ARCHITECTURAL A2.44 UNITS 1+G AND 1+0 ARCHITECTURAL A2.45 UNITS 1+E AND 1+F ARCHITECTURAL A2.46 UNITS 2A AND 2B ARCHITECTURAL A2.4.7 UNIT 2C ARCHITECTURAL A2.48 UNITS 20 AND 2E ARCHITECTURAL A2.49 UNIT 2F ARCHITECTURAL A2.50 UNIT 2+A ARCHITECTURAL A2.51 EG UNITS AND MG UNITS ARCHITECTURAL A3.10 BASEMENT RGP - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A3.11 BASEMENT RGP - AREA B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A3.12 FIRST FLOOR RCP - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A3.13 FIRST FLOOR RGP - AREAS B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A3.14 FIRST FLOOR RGP - AREAS D 4 E SHEET INDEX 4 I � U1 I Df5ciplinL SHEET NAME ARCHITECTURAL A :15 SECOND FLOOR RCP - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A3.16 SECOND FLOOR RGP - AREAS B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A3.11 THIRD FLOOR RCP - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A3.18 - THIRD FLOOR RGP - AREAS B 4 C ARCHITEGTURALIA3.19 FOURTH FLOOR RCP - AREA A ARCHITEGTURALIA3.20 FOURTH FLOOR RGP - AREA B 4 G ARCHITECTURALIA4.00 1EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ARCH ITECTURALIA4.01 ARCHITECTURAL A4.02 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ARCHITECTURAL A4.03 EXTERIOR ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL A4.04 EXTERIOR ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL A4.10 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ARCHITECTURAL A5.00 BUILDING SECTIONS ARCHITECTURAL A5.10 WALL SECTIONS ARCHITECTURAL A5.11 WALL SECTIONS ARCHITECTURAL A5.12 WALL SECTIONS ARCHITECTURAL A5.13 WALL SECTIONS ARCHITECTURAL Ab.00 EXTERIOR DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL Ab.01 EXTERIOR DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A6.02 EXTERIOR DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL Ab.03 EXTERIOR DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A6.04 EXTERIOR DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A6.05 EXTERIOR DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A6.06 EXTERIOR DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A6.0-1 EXTERIOR DETAILS MONUMENT SIGN ARCHITECTURAL A-1.00 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT MAIN COMMONS ARCHITECTURAL Ai.01 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT MAIN COMMONS ARCHITECTURAL AT02 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT MEMORY CARE ARCHITECTURAL A1.03 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT DAYCARE ARCHITECTURAL A-1.04 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT DAYCARE ARCHITECTURAL AT05 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT DAYCARE AND BU51NEBS SUITE ARCHITECTURAL AT.06 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2ND FLOOR AND PUBLIC TOILETS ARCHITECTURAL A7.0'1 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT 3RD AND 4TH FLOORS ARGHITEGTURAL'A8.00 ARCHITECTURALIA8.01 DETAILS DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A8.02 DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A8.03 DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A8.04 DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A8.05 DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A8.06 UNIT DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL AS.OT INTERIOR DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A8.08 INTERIOR DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A8.1O ENLARGED STAIR PLANS ARCHITECTURAL A8.11 ENLARGED STAIR PLAN DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A8.12 MAIN STAIR DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A9.00 DOOR AND FRAME SCHEDULE, NOTES, AND ELEVATIONS ARCHITECTURAL A9.01 WINDOW ELEVATIONS AND OPENING DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A10.00 FIRST FLOOR FIN15H PLAN - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A10.01 FIRST FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREA B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A10.02 FIRST FLOOR FIN15H PLAN - AREAS D 4 E ARCHITECTURAL A10.03 SECOND FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A10.04 SECOND FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREAS B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A10.05 THIRD FLOOR FIN15H PLAN - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A10.06 THIRD FLOOR FIN15H PLAN - AREA B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A10.0-1 FOURTH FLOOR FIN15H PLAN - AREA A ARCHITECTURAL A10.08 FOURTH FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREAS B 4 G ARCHITECTURAL A10.09 FIN15H LEGEND 4 BASEMENT RFS QT OFCHgry RftVe DEC 2 0 2017 M"Wt z� 0 w Tm w 12 z g i z W 0Z 0 TON ~� ��GNNQ w wV (� M =00��w `�!' a W N W �J T 1 W 1 � cj LLJ Z z H z 0 �� �J J Q c ) O Q = � z =v I TITLE SHEET PROJECT NO:14-040 DRAWN BY: AJA CHECKED BY: N AO*O 12/19/9017 1:05:47 PM 1N O Denotes iron monument set marked / with P.L.S. No. 44890 T� • Denotes 1/2 inch iron monument found, marked �5�ti�ry ?d� \L,20c /—FOUND IRON with PLS No. 44890, unless otherwise noted `?\ f RLS 115475 [100.00] Denotes per plat of MISSION HILLS \-- / A Al, qRION HILLS 3RD A DDI TA ON L, / Il \ `'11 L 1 The northeasterly line of Outlot E, MISSION HILLS �^ \ �o "° /�\0�d —`�� /< , is assumed to have a bearing of S43 3448 E. ti �° pJ �J" �I`� /\-NB9053'27"W 78.94--.\ S00°1722"W �l \ �-7 \ . 944 50 0 50 100 \( I ,� lN�j_ DRAINAGE ANDcoa, ��� UTILITY EASEMENT ���\ \ � SCALE IN FEET / �1 1 \ Pr \` J�ry\ti ��O �c,"'�y` i INN\\\ J '04 00 FOUND IRON �6`L /�� i RLS #15475 r \ S76°5l' 7¢Sp l' S t, \ I 2 h \ 18.76 4 1 N69°41'10"E ,' y ;, ; vL J` III\ N29002'51 "W \ �r ' AR ° S!R <% _ S00 43 54' E \ •C\ I 19.02 -<__-_ - 1 10.42 S 9rrt •O� / r V\ _DRAINAGE AND i•__.S48012'03"W I s � � ,� � \ \ - \\ try% UTILITY EASEMENT N42°31'35"E ��\` ip \ 45.11 S54°05'46"W / N45°09.49--. UTILITY EASEMENT E AND y EpSEOENj`�\ \ /-NW CORNTRI I6, R.23 Sg9) ORp1NPGE WO UZ\UT ry ff N89019'43"W / / ��V• I ----- 702.06 -- - POINT OF- RIGHT OF WAY LINE PER-7-FOUND I/2 INCH BEGINNING MnDOT ROW PLAT NO. 1_ %/ I ' OF LINE 1 10-17 NORTHERLY LINE OF SOLID IRON NORTH LINE OF THE NW IE. l TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 312 0/ OF SEC. 24, TWP. II6, RGE. 23 ,�`t' /-RIGHT OF WAY LINE PER / MnDOT ROW PLAT N0. 10-31 LOT 1 \rj\ oko (- \ ^ J M / V (J `C N '--DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT !i \� 0 / C ) ryN hors Z W 10.52 C, h 3/ 2� , C'V 1 N25 30-21 W \ o�J w \A, / 14.87 N73°54'43"W / S82°12'33"E / (I _ FOUND IRON RLS #15475 BL OCK 2 `l U a I W x ; / <W of H (�\ \ 10� ry\O" O,yai N00°13'07"W y I \ c�\ l g� 6 \° 6D 35.27 _ �, v ao12 S09°57'50"E 0° \\ t oM ry -18.59 _P- I ✓ �� n a N _ NI N89°46'53"El, �J\ ��S27°03'37"E a -29.83 -DRAINAGE AND '_26.19 f \-' UTILITY EASEMENT \ �uo° FOUND ALUMINUM v \ �' , S06°42'57"E N23037'25"E / is A R/W MONUMENT- 10 �, I 17.51 38.51 } S32°30'23"W 9 u �/ 22.59 31.62 0 ?� N00 0I 2 101 0 N>409•' „ 41.78�� >r, >6 ��- S00°00'00'E ? 62. 41 4o w s6z \o'az w 6.62 -=— -_ Sssa'6 F I DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT - FOUND ALUMINUM 154 ^w sa y y FOUND ALUMINUM 1 581 30 R/W MONUMENT- {y w LRLMONUMENT I \ N89 050'25 "W 418.38 M N M o \-SOUTH LINE R= /737. 03 OF OUTLOT E L = /30.5/ Tom) / / A / /{' / 7/ / /7 r IIAIAi \ i A / /l '7 L6=4 °/8'/0'I l l \ U/ V/\ %,117%7YY/1 / / vl/. �� / (L=/30.45,7 Ad,,., rl/1T /-1 r- IA/A \/ 'DI A 7- A //-1 lV/„L/L/I I t.2h/ l// Vr/-1 / , c_n l /vv. \-FOUND REBAR C-) G) i-FOUND IRON RLS #12043 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner and proprietor of the following described property situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, to wit: Outlot E, Mission Hills, Carver County, Minnesota, said plat being of record at the Carver County Recorder's Office, excepting therefrom the existing right-of-way as taken for Trunk Highway. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as MISSION HILLS 3RD ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the ponding easements and the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ___— day of ___—__— 20-- M COUNTY OF STATE OF . Signed: Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC This instrument was acknowledged before me on —___ day of ___, 20_-, by —___---_-- of said Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Minnesota the I, Leonard F. Carlson, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me on CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Leonard F. Carlson, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 44890 day of —_—__—_—, 20—_ by Leonard F. Carlson, Land Surveyor. Notary Public, Dakota County, Minnesota My Commission Expires This plat of MISSION HILLS 3RD ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Chanhassen, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof helod this —__ day of , 20—, and is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. All monuments will be set as specified by the City Council and as stated on this plat, according to Minnesota Statute, 505.02, Subd. I. CITY COUNCIL OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA By. --------------- ----- — Mayor By. County Surveyor, Carver County, Minnesota Pursuant to Chapter 395. Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been approved this Luke Kranz, County Surveyor By. County Auditor/Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota day of I hereby certify that taxes payable in __—_ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this day of _—__—__—_, 20—. Laurie Davies, County Auditor/Treasurer am County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this plat of MISSION HILLS 3RD ADDITION was filed this —_—_ day of o'clock __.M. as Document No. Luke Kranz, County Recorder By-------------- - Clerk 20_ 20_— at JISUNDE LAN-T) SURVEYING ' I 1 h oiOo * o / A LEGEND 0 Denotes iron monument set marked with P.L.S. No. 44890 Denotes found iron monument BTL Denotes beaver tail curb CB Denotes catch basin CBX Denotes communication box DIP Denotes ductile iron pipe EMH Denotes electric manhole G Denotes gutter GAS V Denotes gas valve GP Denotes guard post HCR Denotes handicap ramp HYD Denotes fire hydrant INV Denotes structure invert LP Denotes light pole (P) Denotes per plan PVC Denotes polyvinyl chloride pipe RCP Denotes reinforced concrete pipe SAN Denotes sanitary manhole SAN S Denotes sanitary sewer ST S Denotes storm sewer TC Denotes top of concrete curb TCS Denotes traffic control sign TCBOX Denotes traffic control box TL Denotes traffic light UGC Denotes underground communication line W Denotes water line WV Denotes water valve WWB Denotes wood wall base EVG Denotes evergreen tree MPL Denotes Maple tree POP Denotes Poplar tree UNK H/GHWA Y NO. 312 [� I A T N I /-1 .1 l\ .1 - 7 t L _/-\ I I N \J . I \J - I / I&a)T9069 77C 9<f7.2 TOP-905.9 907.2INV-9010 90 �7.3TC 90 �2 TC BTL x 907.6 `� x 907. $q y • 'N (907. y y �c C) a i Wa.b C, A^ DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per Trustee's Deed Doc. No. 550537) Outlot E of the plat of Mission Hills, Carver County, Minnesota, said plat being of record at the Carver County Recorder's Office, excepting therefrom existing right-of-way as taken for Trunk Highway Number 312. PLAT RECORDING INFORMATION The plat of Mission Hills was filed of record on December 30, 1994, as Document No. 175888. [ ] Bearings and/or dimensions listed within brackets are per plat or record documents. TITLE COMMITMENT This survey was prepared without the benefit of current title work. Easements, appurtenances, and encumbrances may exist in addition to those shown hereon. This survey is subject to revision upon receipt of a current title insurance commitment or attorney's title opinion. GENERAL NOTE I.) Survey coordinate and bearing basis: Carver County Coordinate System UTILITY NOTES I.) Utility information from plans and markings was combined with observed evidence of utilities to develop a view of the underground utilities shown hereon. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, excavation may be necessary. 2.) Other underground utilities of which we are unaware may exist. Verify all utilities critical to construction or design. 3.) Some underground utility locations are shown as marked onsite by those utility companies whose locators responded to our Gopher State One Call, ticket number 142880897. 4.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 (800-252-1166) for precise onsite location of utilities prior to any excavation. Area = 376,546 square feet or 8.64 acres x 909.5 x 909.3 _ ASS =-tislo�GR � =9113� �x 910.8 x'918.1 ''7x 9V&L x915.4 9WB 1&I 9W179 917.E WWB BENCH MARKS (BM) I.) Top of top nut of fire hydrant on the west side of Highway 101, Ist hydrant south of 86th St. W. Elevation = 914.12 feet 2.) Top of top nut of fire hydrant on the north side of 86th St. W., Ist hydrant southeast of Highway 101 Elevation = 913.32 feet Elevations shown are based on NAVD 88 Datum I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 4th day of November, 2014 SUNDE LIAND SURVEYING, LLC. By: 2 T Leonard F. Carlson, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 44890 Drawing Title: BOUNDARY, LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHIC and UTILITYSURVEYFOR.- SPER/DES RE/NERSARCHITECTS, INCx CHANHASSEN SENIOR HOUSING Main Office: JISUNDE 9001 East Bloomington Freeway (35W) • Suite 118 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-3435 '41D SURVEYING 952-881-2455 (Fax: 952-888-9526) West Office: www.sunde.com Mandan, North Dakota 701-663-5562 40 0 40 80 Project.20/4-/79 Bk/Pg:685/33 Dote: Township: ll6 Ronge:23 Section: /3 1110412014 SCALE IN FEET File.2014179001.dwa Sheet. I Of 1 r 1 I PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - - - - - - - - SILTATION FENCE ��sE PROPERTY LINE - - - SAWCUT LINE (APPROX.) CURB REMOVAL - ,...... BITUMINOUS REMOVAL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (TEMPORARY) EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (PERMANENT) ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW SOIL BORING CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA ABBREVIATIONS BL G Building BM Bench Mark CB Catch Basin CONIC Concrete ELEV Elevation EX Existing INV Invert MAX Maximum MH Manhole MIN Minimum PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe W.O. Washout APPROXIMATE DISTURBED AREA IS 8.64 ACRES 909.0 908.7 � 908 o°o j o�oyb T i B,NI HYD TC x 908.J9Z�L � l X-7 907.3 x908.5907. ura 0074 �09.1 x 908.6 \ \\\ CONC GAS V GP� 909.7 11.1 x I o.. G /'v I GOaGQ- TC U 10� 0 * 9 907.3 \ X T�\ x 909. GP I\ Tc'6 91/2 s10.7 ay9 % ` soe.�� orc �9°9 �c \ / g 5� TC %�11 -907.1 °,q3 \O ,s9 10.1 10,0 1.2 / x 907.4 9a Q-Py�sll.s xPI.7 a.s / \I 2 '9oy C6\ BM#2 911.0/ a G / I\ 9 `rTC x 909.6 ry : Ox L5 x 907.6 B TC / TC giO�C� 6 x 9 8.7 x 907.7 90 1 +^Q ,9 �,7, ,a TC MYD x 911.6 #' \o` \ g q 910.8 TCS 910.4 /� \ �0 6 +j / 09.POP �' \ l /` �°r° 4�i'LOG�' � x910.6 9106 TC Pi 7c2s OJ sn. J GF \ / \ 1 S 10 TC To TC 5 F,� ` 909.3x 908.4 * 908.3 x 908- J907.9 / \� * 910.2 *NOTE: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE ANTICIPATED �� \ p� - 2.0 / / x91SW- 10o 91' - /s TO BE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE v Oa0 J�\� a o / 9 °' rO.r-y, TD 11 5P� sC s SHOWN. _I e 912.0 G 911.5 q01\ 9\IV 2 /x39s.o -908.7 soe.a / / i 5 s10.$ 7C TC /+\'Y� f / yq 0.0 \ \ `9083 / �/s x909.3i / �\ Gc� 9�Oe10 11 WV 910.6 TOPTC 91C0.6 .\ \ / ST 9 P� 5 9TC.6 NOTE: / STORM SEWER INLETS NOT SHOWN ON PLAN MAY / � ;A� sI1.7 � / \ \ * sos.4 * sos.a * sas.l * �.a � g SP.� RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. < \ z.$ o e TC A 'D' 0 TC / \ \ ./ x 910.6 INSTALL INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION PER DETAIL J /O��jA� /x - k \ ,Q\ / / / 911.[ / �h [� x9 2.z LpQ'i O / x 12.2 �.l9i0 / 11 a'•- 2/C400 ON ALL STORM INLETS THAT MAY RECEIVE 3 �� 9111 // �9157 \g/g _ / c 8 2sc T11 RUNOFF. \ \ 3.1 ❑ ei ti /� \ \ slo.z xslo.l / 91 7 1 2 :. 10 1AIT0.7 Cn TC x 910, 7 / Iy. 916.8 ` \ \ x91 I.� x910.6-4 / ./ / / /L914,I �.. TC yC 93� 91 7 ' / ti A / / 5 s14. o TC33 x9j�2 / a�yg/�4/,// �* 1 \ t..--9/+- xsll.z / *�6,gF /< / g\\;y`6 s117/ / 1 ' .911.5 TC' ��+'�8.1 91 .6 x911J / �.- / / / 916.2 \ n9 TG9,9SAN \ 913.4 �'C .1 / \'Lh/ }1 2 (g18.2 x *9T32 " �. / \ \ \ /��J TC �? //// \ \x�9/ 170 g 9�0 INV= l // 9 / x 913 3 -9144 / /'�' A \\ 909.6 I I .5 918.1 / 7C1.� x 91 2 / / / / x/ e 3 913.3 ! \ x 913.'�'/,}-- J91�.7 / / / / /� j 9L" / �/� x 916.5 \ \ 6 \ 2 "_fiC-92�n \, 9C8.8 �� \\ TC ��J� '9 J.2.3 C .9 91 / �4 9T6.2 �. �� - _�� \ .- �� �.. �3.7 / / x 91`5-. / ` \ \ \ \ 2/ 13 y7O g 09.4 / \•\J� / ai"'/ ' 9I H. ( . 9I7.0� \ -x 9 &) -- J * 915.F1 /� '� i- Y 918.2 x 16.3 y / -918.6 \ \ \ *916.4 1 -915-7 / / / / 9 \ \ \ /Xs1ay� \ sIIV C\ 908.9 91777E 0/ 9J 7.'2/ - - - - - - TC T I1.9 4' /�/ \ \ x97�7 \ -916. / �' 9 7.9 / ! \ \ 9. 9 909.2 / TC / 3'I j,9 / /X919. \ \x 9ha:'0 ,g{8-- ._ ` ` "g-/�- / 919. j \y \ �" \ �. *ems \ x977 8 \ \ \x 910.2 Qp0/p ' 91 / ,9IS 6? \ * 918.5 918.7 91ff.4 �, * 917.7 -� / / * 919 7 \ ' 9 Y \ 908.7 9C471NV=so'.I 3 / //// ,�. _„� '\ / / b920.1 / �-� \ 1 ttthhh II� I 2 ws"'Z -� / / / 912.3 /// �• x 919.3 -_ '-<J/� r' x 919.E " 919.6 '.- \ - \ / x 9�.6 / / * 921.6 \ \ x 91716 1 I /� 905.7 119 ST / f g 905.8 W / TC / /!// -2 9 * 919.7 r 91 \ . 9 9.8 \ iQ W \\ 2 / z919�8 ! �. .� x9 WATER TC 0 12.4 r/i/ / / *9 * 919�9 /x 920.0 /' x 92G.4 \ \ - / / / x 921.9 ` ` 8 � � /pg� 905.6 / /CON \`b' ��///� /� / x 920.3 * 920.7 * 920.3 \ x 919.7 / x 920 * 921.8 -e \ 1 915. I�� w905.6 / L � 920.0 76 1 `-91Q� w x 9 / 912. / / / * 920.7 * 920.7 " 920.6 - / 921.9 / / 1 / / TC 2. / T (A 5 g * 920. i "M L -920.4 O "> ! ti / -920.6 912. /� 2 - /'-" * 921. '"9 x 921.0 922. ' \ / \ Q' / x921.1 *92i.2 '�� / x921.3 �91 / 1�1 CB / TC °+/ // 92 x 921.5 / TOP 912.0 \ x 920.8 / , I \ x I 9 4 3 92 .2 \ \ * 92 .2 (v / / 920.8� �-,^ * 922.5 \ x g721'8 ST-7 x 922.8 ' ' -j�L G� 3 912.3 ,/ � � x 921.7/' x 922.2 \ * 921.3 x 923.0 3. c % / 42 . RIGH �OF WAY TAKEN PEF�- - - \ 921.7/ / g // / TCa.3 / / �� 9 \ \�921.s MNDOT ROW PLAT ND -17 ! / \ x9223\ / �91(� /p;, \ _ 2py, 923. / 0�"I / 92 P /4j/ j/ / \ .Sim / Sr 1 ! -. -. -x 913.0 x 923.7 *,922.0".- �7') * i 912 5 0 \\ \` x 922. 23. x 92 3 I(/�( /912.5 / 9 * 923.8* ,/ i x 923.3 ` ST-18 _ ' 9C4.4 / TC M ////j\ \ \ / /. 29 3.2 f / i- -' �x924. -924.4 \ `� 240 \x\.0 -922.4 / / // �///4/// *99Y3.a // ////��a�. \ \ / / / ' ^924.88 �..qQ�� \ x92 4921.9 21.(3 2 8 / / 4 / / / *923.� 923.1 y--•� -"25.0 ST-8� *922.9 / /• / /�g/��g�// 911.4 g / h 5 yTC2� / �1�Y/// " 9za.a \ \ /gx / x \ x 924.$ r C / //4{/// //// 5 ^\ �� ✓ / / / x 925.5 \ "�24.1 I / 920 TC / OJT /l'/K \ \ * 923.5 / / x 924.5 / / ry'0 x \ \ * 925.1\ x 924.� 20.9 * / r �i 926.3 / L J 914.7 / 913.6 �12.9 X � // SI� / ! \ \ \ x 924.5 \ �_ / ! \ x 925.6 \ Ix 922.9 / / / 92q� / / �911.8 t ?. 3 / mo /� //�f4 // / / szs.s \ \ \ x sza.4 szs.a / 926.E / / % szo.z x / / 921.0 \ -925.4 9 5.2 / �l/1 /CB RCp o 2 / \ ` x/ / x9�3.3 / x92L5 / 7 / TOP=912.// C l 914.�INV:97 gtiv/ // / // / \ _ - f x926.4� x924.9 x9�4.3 / -919.9 / x926.8 -921.8 / /6% �911.6 �I6/0 { I *926.6 / \ -926.5 *920.3 9T�2 " 9?`. / ��'.Z,_ I * 925.8 / ( 919.7 x 9C5.1 / / wP M %+t \ \ \ -.- -. / / '�- / x9�4.3 / *922.9 1 / x920.6 / / t� x 927.6 `� 927.2 * 9 7 _ \ x 927.7 ) * 926.9 x 924.5 913.%/ / �I /92\. \ ` SST-17 / x926.6 / ST-10 9 /923.0 / x92/.3 9300 911.7 `v C I / TC / ///x \ \ I \ x 927.8 / x 926.8 / / l T 919.5 x ' �' 1r Oi TC 0/� Jq' \ TC 914.0 / ® 13.7 / / / / /0. \ ' x\923.9 I I ��� 927 / / x 926.3 / / x 925.7 x 923.7 / / / I / ,q 419.8//' / ES / I \ , 926.0 x / / 9 - x 926.1 / / x 921.8 1 x 920� / \� 915.4 135 5 _ / g/Jl /j%/x 919.6 ` \ \ \ x927.9 /// 913.0 TC ' y l v / / l 1 21' ` \ x 92h17 / x 925�Y x 924.M /922.9 9193 x C' m \ * 23 8 \ \ \ \ / / x 925.8 x 924.6 / * I ' x 920.4 19.7; g\ / �925.4 \ 1919.0 \ \ \ 926. i >` ryV \ \ \ \ � \ 26.3 \ � 9� i927.0 / / / -"" \ ._ / 1 I l/ C� x 15.6 1913.7 / I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ / 923.4 �923 \ \ x 924.4 / / 923.3 / x 42.2 I , 919.4 9119.k I TC\ CV * 926.4 / x 925. , / �.,_ � � -- / � 1 / / 913.9 r\ *�JY2. x 923.8 921,2 0) I ' I 1yw� Ix9i8 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / f / / �922.9 / ��219'� I x/X 79 / 1 1 I Oi \'j \ \ \ �- . / / x 921.6 ,\ \ --� / x 922.6 \" 9CSI9 x 914�C 0 / \ \ �'�c2\ \ \ `9"2¢ / / / / / / \ \ ` \ 92 -- 9 22.33 ( I i x 919.8 ` 9 S. * 18.0 \ \ \. \ `�a2 / �- x 92a -_ -- \ x 922.6 " 914.1 �� 1a e.s \ �x9zo l \ �xs\z\ \ �\ x923.4� �.s� f azo.s / -77 / / U � 3 \ �-- 5yig.\ �' --- � _ \ \ \. �- -/ 'x91aS- - --__ -� \ •� \ \ Jxs2z.ol I sl/.5 q , s17. C� TC /�" RCP / _ _ \ \ \ \ \ / 7 / �/t9 - \ � SL 922n' 9119.9 9I I / CB S / X 09.7 `� I / i l TOP=9JJ .9 \ �� \ \ \ \ _- ! / xyI70 \ \ \ \ \ x921.7 / /x 1920 j �"916.8 J INV=9110.1 W 914 / 915.3 - _ \ _ / ` \ \ \ / 0./g �) BOT= 99.4 �.--9ffT� \ \ / \ '/ \ \ l r� 9C 3 *915.1 TC x91 .8"'� ' \ \ \ \ \ '� / \ \ \ \ x�a \ x921.8±9y8.' xl X9149_ _ I // xs'1a.9r-12\ 01 / _"- -9+3- \ x3iSs\, ".` / / \ 916.4 g �TC7 / 9 /v 'Z i �-� \ \ \ \ \\ 916,5 - / ! i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �20.1 TC D I� 9�1 .7 " / .�-- �"9fF-- -- \ \ \ \ \ \ --_' ,gl62 / " 914.a ! '`� 6.7 ! 1 m� �C / RIGHLOr-WAY-T-AKEN�E&�\ � \\ �� - - - / / x913.z ` \ � \ � \ \ \ \ ` � / 915, / NjND9Z OVEFL-AT I-V10. TOT � � \ \ - � / � / \ \ \ V 1 1920.91 \9 \ `-., \ \ \ / / �. _` x 913.3\ \ \ \ \ \ / x 9 7. 919.0 11 11 / / / \ \ '� �-- \ ��"' li gl4s \ \ �94 \ ! �+s7.o TCCCCCC 915.6 6. 917.7 g � 9''.31 � 7.9 ,}?-' !� �903.L \ \ \ \x\ \ x 97.z� / 916.1 ° � �X 9a63\ \ \ \ \ / 9`2V,% i 417.0 / i \ \ `�� \ \\ \ \ 911.4 \ \ \ sT-13 TC 915.8 I I 1 I 1 / / / / / / / / .�• \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ -�. 911.9 / / x 910.4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �- 91 /I / /x 91 @.5 2 TC 9i6. 1 �OF2` ST-1� \ \ "�.4��'�\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ / x910,I x1.8 x913.4\ 9C7.1 x 9 6.3 / I /// / ..--' „" \ \\ � \ �. \ \.\\ µ Il6 20.3 Q \ i 11 1 I' ( �'i / /' J_ * . F --- 997. / �M1 x 89& I \ \ \ 6 \ \ .� \ \\ \ \ x 906. \ \ 15 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -91 1 \ \ �/ N 916 3 ` $�1� \ x 9\pppppp\\\3 \ \ \ H 9C7.4 TC\ I m 6' 11 173/� /' / I/ 897.E%\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ 901501 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \x\ \\ 9"19`.0 _= 918.5 w fj n! / x - x 908.6 x 909.2 0 Z ^.� 1 1 % / J896.1 �897�2" \ \. \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \" 9a \ \ 91�4- " \. � '' 8,g� \ \ \\ \\ \ \ � x 910.3 � x 911.3 \' �917.0 /hn I / 1( ( I xg 6 \. -8 896.2 \ \ \ ~ x90a.1 \ x\903 \ \ \ \ \ FOUND "� -�"s`\ \ -� 917.7 \916.9 / a m 1 , I I / P Sys x 895.3 x�9g,8` \ 897.9 ` \ \ \ \ \ 907.2 Ui�v iN M R /W TC TC U r-8 5g \ \ x900. \ 30" 17FP x8$4.9 x 89F. �895� xe§7.s ' - \ 9�5 \ \ \s s.a \ MONUME x 911 sr S\ Q �\ 2 _ ass 3 - - - 2 - - - 2 s1o.7 ���\\ -ss7"- "--��-00 6 \ \ so9.a 9g9.$ x 2 \ tO xI I\ \�'�\`�`�==--'-. - -" -905 _J x 906.2 J / 910.3 x - TC 917.9 `\ \ \\\x 90:58 _- - - -.� "- Jam-- -- __ - _ - -- - J -x 91A.8 x 909.5 TC 9res O dI \ \ \ -f3- - _ - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - -9 - - - - -_ - xs09.3 "\ ,-ED.�E 0 M�AEL>=-''_9o»�x-sBT.o--__seic-= _ - - - - - - - _ __-_-_ -_ - - _ _- _ _ _ _ _ 9i-�- 911-1x` --.�I 8 GRASS 918.1 918.z TL 917.9 \ \' S�\'`�- =$f� 9 -'� - --=x"9i8.9- x-9�H'... -'+�913:2 - - Jf4 $�i-'3_ 4.�. --x si0.a _ �'�" s---_ x9fT3 BTL BTL9917.89TC9 9I7. X 1 �~--.J-f4 -- =13-- - - �.uwe_.'- WWq -. avwg- -wvt� .wcGB,� - _�y--3/6-- 117. 18BOX �91 -9h?9 91,?6 -9i= -9175 -�i 7S.-. 917.0 91Z4- -9i 7:4 •-918.4-9'ZIYP \ �*916,8 T916Z HCRCONC s8..4 wwe -9 8 si8.2 92 .019f9'- WWB \ �/7 \ "975.4--x g1v_7x.9f8. 1.� xsl5.a TC TG �ZJ 19T ___w WB '\ - j 919:fi.' 918. ` 91B wwe --� 91% _ 917.6 WWB n A N I F-� nY �) I /\ I 1T n r- t A l A\ �� I A -r N I n �� j -7 M I N L,/ Ll I I\ I\ 7 F l I / V V/-\ L_/-\ I I N L/ �� I / CB TOP=913.9 INV=891.5 KEYED NOTES KEYED NOTES ARE DENOTED BY NO ON PLAN. ❑1 INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. REFER TO DETAIL 1/C400. ❑2 INSTALL SILT FENCE USING ORANGE FABRIC. REFER TO DETAIL 4/C400. ❑3 INSTALL INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION. REFER TO DETAIL 2/C400. ® NOT USED. ❑5 NOT USED. © NOT USED ❑ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEMPORARY CONTAINED CONCRETE WASH OUT BIN. REFER TO THE MINNESOTA'S NPDES/SDS GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR MORE DETAILS. SELF CONTAINED CONCRETE WASHOUTS ON CONCRETE DELIVERY TRUCKS IS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO ON -SITE CONTAINMENT. REFER TO DETAIL 3/C400. ❑8 SAWCUT AND REMOVE DRIVE ENTRANCE AND CURB IN ITS ENTIRETY. REFER TO SHEET C300 FOR PROPOSED REPLACEMENT CURB. FOLLOW ALL CITY AND COUNTY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ❑9 REMOVE EXISTING TREE IN ITS ENTIRETY, INCLUDING STUMP. 10 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE EXTENT SHOWN. SAWCUT AND REMOVE AT NEAREST JOINT. 11 SAWCUT AND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE EXTENTS SHOWN. 10 40' 20' 0 401 80' SCALE 19 = 407 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SITE GRADING OPERATIONS. THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND WATERSHED DISTRICT MUST BE NOTIFIED UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES AN D D PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION BEING COMMENCED THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SCHEDULE A PRE -CONSTRUCTION GRADING MEETING ON -SITE WITH THE CITY AND WATERSHED DISTRICT. IF DAMAGED OR REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE RESTORED AND IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH DAY. 2. ANY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY OR WATERSHED; BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER THE GRADING ACTIVITIES, SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THEIR REQUEST. 3. CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED. 4. NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. 5. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 (H: V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION. 6. NO DEVIATIONS SHALL BE MADE FROM THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN, WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE CITY. 7. FOR SITES GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRE, AS REQUIRED BY THE MPCA PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, THE PERMIT APPLICANT MUST KEEP AN EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION LOG. INSPECTION MUST BE MADE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EVERY RAIN EVENT. THE INSPECTION RECORD MUST BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CITY AND WATERSHED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF REQUEST. 8. FLOWS FROM DIVERSION CHANNELS OR PIPES (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT) SHALL BE ROUTED TO SEDIMENTATION BASINS OR APPROPRIATE ENERGY DISSIPATERS TO PREVENT TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO OUTFLOW TO LATERAL CONVEYORS AND TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION WHEN RUNOFF FLOWS INTO THESE CONVEYORS. 9. SITE ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE GRADED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCES, DIVERSION CHANNELS, OR DIKES AND PIPES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM EXITING THE SITE VIA THE ACCESS ROADS. SITE -ACCESS ROADS/DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE SURFACED WITH CRUSHED ROCK WHERE THEY ADJOIN EXISTING PAVED ROADWAYS. 10. SOILS TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY MOTOR VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CLEANED DAILY FROM PAVED ROADWAY SURFACES, OR MORE FREQUENTLY IF REQUESTED BY CITY OR WATERSHED, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 11. DUST CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PERFORMED PERIODICALLY WHEN CONDITIONS REQUIRE AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OR WATERSHED. 12. SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES 8 INCHES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY HOME PROPERTIES) WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHER STABILIZATION. 13. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE USED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF SITE CONSTRUCTION UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT. IF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR NATURAL EVENTS DAMAGE OR INTERFERE WITH THESE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, THEY SHALL BE RESTORED TO SERVE THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION AT THE END OF EACH DAY OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. 14. ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY AREAS WHICH HAVE BEEN FINISHED GRADED OR AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN DISTURBED AND FOR WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SET FORTH IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPHS WITHIN 48 HOURS: A. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE EITHER MULCHED AND DISC -ANCHORED OR COVERED BY FIBROUS BLANKETS TO PROTECT SEEDS AND LIMIT EROSION. TEMPORARY STRAW MULCH SHALL BE DISC -ANCHORED AND APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF NOT LESS THAN TWO TONS PER ACRE AND NOT LESS THAN 80% COVERAGE. B. IF THE GRADED AREA IS ANTICIPATED TO BE RE-DISTURBED/DEVELOPED WITHIN SIX MONTHS, PROVIDE A TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER CONSISTING OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) SEED MIXTURE 21-111 (OATS), OR 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT), AT A RATE OF 100 POUNDS PER ACRE. C. IF GRADED AREA WILL NOT BE DEVELOPED FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN SIX MONTHS, PROVIDE A SEMI -PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER OF SEED MIXTURE MNDOT 22-112 AT A RATE OF 40 POUNDS PER ACRE. D. GRADING BONDS OR THE EQUIVALENT SECURITIES SHALL BE RETAINED UNTIL TURF HAS GERMINATED AND SURVIVED A 60-DAY GROWING PERIOD. E. ALL AREAS THAT WILL N4I BE MOWED OR MAINTAINED AS PART OF THE ULTIMATE DESIGN WILL BE PERMANENTLY RESTORED USING SEED MIXTURE MNDOT 25-141 AT A RATE OF 59 POUNDS PER ACRE. F. UNLESS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (I.E. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN OR LANDSCAPE PLAN), PERMANENT TURF RESTORATION SHALL CONSIST OF MN/DOT SEED MIXTURE 25-131 (COMMERCIAL TURF GRASS) AT A RATE OF 220 POUNDS PER ACRE. G. WHENEVER OTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ARE INADEQUATE, TEMPORARY ON -SITE SEDIMENT BASINS THAT CONFORM TO THE CRITERIA FOR ON -SITE DETENTION BASINS SHALL BE PROVIDED. 11. RUNOFF SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS PROVIDING THEY ARE NOT NEEDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. WHERE STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS ARE NECESSARY FOR SITE DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION, A SILT FENCE OR SEDIMENT PROTECTION DEVICES AS DETAILED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AROUND ALL CATCH BASINS UNTIL THE TRIBUTARY AREA TO THE CATCH BASIN IS RESTORED. 12. GRADING ACTIVITIES PROPOSED TO BEGIN AFTER OCTOBER 15 WILL REQUIRE AN APPROVED PHASING SCHEDULE. THE AREA OF LAND THAT THE CITY WILL ALLOW TO BE DISTURBED AT THIS TIME OF YEAR WILL BE SEVERELY LIMITED. THE CITY WILL ALSO REQUIRE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVISES, I.E., TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS, DORMANT SEEDING AND HIGH RATES OF APPLICATION OF BOTH SEED AND MULCH. 13. FILTER BLANKET AND RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDES OF ALL STORM SEWER OUTLETS 24 HOURS AFTER CONSTRUCTION AS INDICATED AND DETAILED. ALL RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A FILTER MATERIAL MEETING THE MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR RIPRAP AND FILTER MATERIAL. 14. EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF ALL LAKES, PONDS AND WETLANDS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE AREA TO BE GRADED UNTIL THE TRIBUTARY AREA TO THE LAKE, POND OR WETLAND IS RESTORED. 15. TO MINIMIZE EROSION, ALL 3:1 SLOPES SHALL BE COVERED WITH A MN/DOT 3885 CATEGORY 2 STRAW EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS OR STAKED SOD. 16. ACCUMULATION OF ALL SEDIMENT OCCURRING IN STORM SEWERS, DITCHES, LAKES, PONDS AND WETLANDS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO, DURING AND AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES. 17. EROSION CONTROL ITEMS AND DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONLY AFTER THE AREA HAS RECEIVED FINAL STABILIZATION OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY AND/OR WATERSHED. 18. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST. RILEY PURGATORY EROSION CONTROL NOTES: A.NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. B.ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 (H:V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION. C.FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY THAT AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD AND INCORPORATED INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE TREATMENT WHEREVER TOPSOIL HAS BEEN REMOVED. D.CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED. E.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT. F. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED UPON FINAL STABILIZATION. G.SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES (8 INCHES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY HOME PROPERTIES) WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHER STABILIZATION. H.ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER LAND -DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON A PROPERTY THAT DRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS ELSEWHERE. I. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE - SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST. Id z W ou Qi CO3 CG W z W Q R� V Z n 0 ' Q L0 tJ w O 2 w O Q a N Q Lu z ^ N az LU Z '0 0O01Z w Lo 0z01 Oa ,V(n 00 r ' 0 0, 0 04 0 = X O �t cn m CL SS CO 9 I� 3 O M s_ pC T u7 Lo N g h I 3Z MZ 02 cc) � W [0 '6 go - w W �C9 a1 _.= d w n m mW o C: L Y E a �+ (Dj;d LLm ^a U Rm._ s V I N W J 3� LLJ U W Z 0 0 ZN I � /V O = V DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM C000 PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - - - - - - - - SILTATION FENCE - PROPERTY LINE - - SAWCUT LINE ----------- (APPROX.) PROPOSED CONTOUR �- DRAIN TILE ---�--- STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL CATCH BASIN ■ MANHOLE Ab ABBREVIATIONS BLDG Building BM Bench Mark BW Bottom of Wall CB Catch Basin CONIC Concrete ELEV Elevation EX Existing FFE Finished Floor Elevation HWL High Water Level INV Invert LFE Lower Floor Elevation MAX Maximum MH Manhole MIN Minimum PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe TW Top of Wall W.O. Washout eANI HYD a0 \ A s x saeaTy�� 7 908.5 s8L BITUMINOUS x 09.1 x 908.6 \ \\ CONIC x 90e,2 I s, bl2 T, 1.7 U 907.1 TC n 8 907.3 907. HCR 907.4 907.6 O TOP=907.3 INV=904.6 GAS V GPO 909 7 7.8 FLARED END SECTION , �n \ G�� c.1 3 10.0 A°^ 9 6 / 5 TF cP �� /I /- A G FLARED END SECTION APPROXIMATE DISTURBED AREA / o xyl017 ` 9' IS 8.64 ACRES 1.0 2 pf i os r WITH RIPRAP o 9oe / ;z FILwo Its EROSION CONTROL P ( rc's x 9112 910.7 a° 9 I / or os BLANKET (TEMPORARY) ..... \ / Ge TC �I/D 6 UPI. $885 6 ` .,>�2 c �° SysS%� / 5 / 2 v EROSION CONTROL • / P / P5 91✓7 �i�fi INV.�9d518� �\ \s� BLANKET (PERMANENT) \ J 11.9 ti sn.o/ N G4 sn.fi / _ q 9.`ayEO„ 13.00 4 2 � x 909. ROCK CONSTRUCTION \O �� ENTRANCE X 9I I1;b OF 4 +4\ . 2 \ or DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW �� \ �� \ TC 2 �Cj 9� A` O� / zs \ ° o c 5 If, 905.1 I s, RETAINING WALL SPOT lY GAF' \�OJ x 2.0I., ELEVATION TC 6 \ x 912.0 G 911. 5 dry. /9\ry x 908. 908.7 x 908.4 2 SPOT ELEVATION 0.3 P + SOIL BORING S� �a( r 4 989 \ / / o ISTf / 12.8 / �a0��i� 911.7 `y //^ \ x909.4 x909. x909.1CONCBW 0800 ,' 2 1 i AREA WASHOUT Y/0Q AREA �J ` rc x 9y2�G0p��,� 0 6 TG /x 1 \ / ^ : ::: ',ryjlD.� / i #1 \ / y Icy TW 13 00 y � / W 1 3.0 'NOTE: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE ANTICIPATED \ :�` TIC cP o5� a`ti�� , �ST-4 x910.z slD.l ,rgll_o4 TO BE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE g SHOWN. ` tip T11qiy',/ 9168I 1.... \ x910.6 (� \ T13.3 x9J/l.2 / Ss°�/\��\ "' /�// \ i-9/a-- -- 3 ( 91 \ n ❑3/x-9A47.k. + 2.5 X i9\jD�ry 911.7� /�/ ® ".i;l' x 91 L5 ° e e c �///// his .911.7 3.8 4 2.7 i,1 13.4 /•��5�� / /g\15/ xr9187 -I x9132 .9 2 4.0 c �,..11 TC 4 6 NOTE: STORM SEWER INLETS NOT SHOWN ON PLAN MAY RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. INSTAL INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION PER DETAIL 2/C400 ON ALL STORM INLETS THAT MAY RECEIVE RUNOFF. EOF / q TC HYD ,g 910.8 TCS 910.4 x910.6 ® TC � BOG 910.6 TC x 910.2 x s0.2 C I 115 J� / 9TIC \ IL /9 SPAS 910.6 / TC TOeS x 910.8 , � WV 910.6 SA 9IC 0.6 je ! G `P= TO 10.8 9 3 G INV-B 6 2 •PJ5 910.6 0.6 Pa. TC 0.7 2 13.�3/.3--. TC 0 16.3/ JCS' r!/.;i,.,. - �( N 0`~ ^y / �/ 9rjx ` ss1 Qs157 4.7 / s�z \ I ' J j°� a.z/ / TC x _ xsl xs1s7 TOP-911. � 9C4.q INV=90Y1 912.3//�/ // 1 > -. 6.0 .k920.1 // x 9I9.6 � x 921.6 '- TC1.9 x91.� LY{�� y( tC 2 911. C 908.9 sos.z 908,5 \ \ 9983a 910.2 9os2 W 905.7 �oa.e C 905.6 RILEY PURGATORY EROSION CONTROL NOTES: III I U� �1i4I .�.,92 -921.8 P A.NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST ♦ • � ' `� �� •� i cam• i1 � � �, , . ,- /� . CB j1 ✓ I i � / t 1 , • 'yti ;i © /' �..o •may' � ,N 1 + % ' .� • .�, /tea: ,, ,, t i L v , i \ V I' Y R w / ) r 144 TC a i • v . r � /912.' • % ' ` roc) ��,, �, r � f� r�ci ' ./1••/ '/ •;Y11 / `. �.j - • a:Blct ram•'- i " 11 /i / 4 f A r r i t' • .� r Y 1 rIM Ate„ / •1•/' ^ I rVIEW �•/ i 911.7 .Y r Y • ♦ /� 3 �c kt .,' : r,••„ •/,,,. •'^\ /�Yc�, �'", Cry\o r• o 1 ICU Y o l / - Y••n r• u l ♦ / Y .N, Y �� i r N r • ./ I/ � I I •p• Ip • i�jf1\,., .�{'i r�,r r • it . .� �Ii Y�c� �, •, • 6.5 -914. All •a� I03 . , 5 -A • � r :r 1 l .�,,. • . ai `� • - ,'• ...g�. • � ♦'iR� • � ) ,^ .Ilan "� rj�{•. '�`'�-�::J� � Y�•1 Y ,.�. , � '► � II as�u I 1' f�! j`- f�> , Ci\ � •fin ��� vjj5�[i) ran e © � � I(! �"-\\ 'r- � ` 6� �Y�' `♦ rho V�•1 ' •r�� :6 �_. II �,�, ©� ��:• .:.,: � +� .fin i I I) � _:.� c© ~ • .�.. n • r chit y �� t '•r o r�7 I s r o G y I �II � � 4� I 1 •• � ''• � � �� 1�� ram•, I• � f•� � ., WIN i • ' �i. y\ r 1 ; • 1 �� . � r�,l a-Yl�t � � fl Yam•, `► � � / • TIV �- .. X gill �I `� ; r�'°t'•, • •r" MW �P3..,„ �`� i e �i'vjnl�� yam• I/ ' , •'I/ flUTtll`r -+.. - mow.. ® �_ -�/i �pv , -r. / 9169 T6 WE •IQ t SIT ..:.. siTY .s �. 2 - _ 2 y \. \ s6v. J 9103 x 2 0.2 x 906.2 �90I -- --.. 918.1 91Z5 TC � 9i7.9 \ �\ \ \\ pale __ __ _--G EA�S--�j o-� Wse�.o--= Mpg-WF_L�=-906'-�7=_ .-_ - �_ = - ---.� _ _ _ _ _.-- _-_'s/ir'- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_-_-_- -. 9fz� - _ --w91'rl'9fi- 91I_I x� - - - - - --- x 09.5 x 909.3 CC 918.1 TC TL 918.2 917.9 9I7.9 TCB \ X6 \ CRA\ �--- _� _- 9$9 = si-A- _ _ T---_ "si -- - "-iJF0.9-----+.9I+r9-� __-- _ -- -_ --- -x'913T-� - x 4.7- -- -9L -_ - x '-9 /S-- --- 9'/-•3_ ---' -� -- _" - - -'-- -- -- --- �ylps G R A S S -_ ."_ --x 9iT'3 -�----_x 4I0.8 6'aL BTL9917.8 TC 917.6 _ .-'�/._ _i'f2= _ _ t -�.. �,,.- -N -"- --VJOl}D _ -WALE-,_- --` '-- -_- 915.6_ ._ -. -x.37.2-� _- --'- ._„- -- --_ - --_ -.-- .-- w� - �rWe - - - -wv 9+5= Q 17,& T18.0 �9C�--9+7-9 8VZ.6-9/6-9fLff -91 -91 �-- =-a�Ws_ - �y,�yg �yW® - wvc� w�e-�- _. 7.5-. 917.0 01�4- �" ._ y�' - -9'117-£ _ x s16.r- -9/6-- -- HCR 9#7:4 --9f8.4 i �_ -11916.8`- CONC �.4 wwe --_. 0 9i9- -_ -9fS-Wa wit--, \ sls.a s16.2 TC �wwssr-.-_. 41 �yy 9•� -.r--x917x•s+s.l.� 91�F- _ 918B917.6 � I 917.8 TRUNK H/GHW4 Y NO. 212 WIND NANIF\nT 1T �\F- r,/A\ DI AT- NIn 7 IVII NL)\J I I \I\Jn I \J VV/-\ L-/-\ I 1 V\i. ICE TOP=913.9 NV=891.5 NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. &ADDITIONAL MEASURES SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 H:V OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION. C.FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY THAT AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD AND INCORPORATED INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE TREATMENT WHEREVER TOPSOIL HAS BEEN REMOVED. D.CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED. E.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT. FALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED UPON FINAL STABILIZATION. G.SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AlRIPPING TO A' DEPTH OF / 18 INCHES 8 INCHES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY HOME PROPERTIES) WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHER STABILIZATION. H.ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER LAND -DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON A PROPERTY THAT DRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS ELSEWHERE. I. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION 13Y THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST. J m \ of U 0 U 0 U TOWNHOME NOTES KEYED NOTES ARE DENOTED BY NO ON PLAN. �1 INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. REFER TO DETAIL 1/C400. �2 INSTALL SILT FENCE USING ORANGE FABRIC. REFER TO DETAIL 4/C400. �3 INSTALL INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION. REFER TO DETAIL 2/C400. ® INSTALL MN/DOT 3885 CATEGORY 2 TEMPORARY STRAW FIBER EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. INSTALL MN/DOT 3885.2B.5 CATEGORY 1 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT. ADDITIONAL PERIODIC MAINTENANCE MAY BE REQUIRED AT OVERFLOW AREAS. © FILTRATION BASIN AND WATER QUALITY TREATMENT PONDS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT HE BEGINNING OF GRADING OPERATIONS. FILTRATION BASINS ARE TO BE ROUGH GRADED AND SURROUNDED WITH SILT FENCE PER DETAIL 4/C400. REFER TO DETAIL 1/C402, 2/C402, 3/C402, 4/C402 , AND 5/C402 FOR FILTRATION BASIN CROSS SECTIONS. ALL TRIBUTARY AREAS MUST BE STABALIZED PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION OF STORMWATER TO THE FILTRATION BASINS. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IN FILTRATION AREAS IS NOT ALLOWED AFTER AREA HAS BEEN EXCAVATED. IF AREA BECOMES COMPACTED, LOOSEN SOIL WITH MECHANICAL TILLER PRIOR TO FINAL STABILIZATION. FILTRATION AREAS ARE NOT APPROVED BORROW SITES AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT BASINS INFILTRATE AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 1-INCH PER HOUR USING A PERCOLATION TEST ON ALL BASINS BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE. PERCOLATION TEST SHALL BE SIGNED BY A REGISTERED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND ENGINEER FOR REVIEW BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEMPORARY CONTAINED CONCRETE WASH OUT BIN. REFER TO THE MINNESOTA'S NPDES/SDS GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR MORE DETAILS. SELF CONTAINED CONCRETE WASHOUTS ON CONCRETE DELIVERY TRUCKS IS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO ON -SITE CONTAINMENT. REFER TO DETAIL 3/C400. ® INSTALL MONUMENT SIGN. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. W 40' 20' 0 40' 80, SCALE 1n = 40' RETAINING WALL NOTES: 1. ALL TOP AND BOTTOM ELEVATIONS CORRESPOND TO THE RESPECTIVE GRADE ELEVATIONS ON EACH SIDE OF THE WALL. 2. THE BOTTOM ELEVATION IS THE ELEVATION OF THE LOW-GRADE SIDE OF THE WALL, NOT THE TOP ELEVATION OF THE BURIED BLOCK COURSE. 3. ALL RETAINING WALLS SHALL HAVE PROTECTIVE FENCING AT THE TOP WHERE THE VERTICAL HEIGHT EXCEEDS 30 INCHES. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A MINNESOTA LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF WALL. WALKWAY NOTES: 1. GRADING CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR SO THAT ALL STEPS AND LANDINGS ARE SLOPED PER CODE. 2. ALL SIDEWALK LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE SLOPES ARE TO BE PER CODE. GRADING NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE, REVIEW ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND FIELD VERIFY THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE GIVEN FOR WORK THAT COULD HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED BY A SITE VISIT OR CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT REVIEW. SUN LAND SURVEYING. CONTACT LEONARD F. CARLSON AT 952 881-2455. 2. HE BACKGROUND INFORMATION WAS PREPARED BY DE ( ) 3. IT IS HE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN HE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION ELEVATION AND MARK ALL EXISTING UTILITIES 48 HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION STARTS HE ENGINEER ARCHITECT OR OWNER DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL THE U11LITIES ARE MAPPED OR IF MAPPED, ARE SHOWN CORRECTLY. CONTACT GOPHER ONE AT 651-454-0002 FOR FIELD LOCATING EXISTING UTILITIES. CONTACT UTILITY OWNER IF DAMAGE OCCURS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. PROTECT ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES WHICH ARE NOT SCHEDULED FOR REMOVAL. 5. NOTIFY CITY BUILDING INSPECTOR BEFORE TRENCHING AND EXCAVATION WORK COMMENCES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN AS 17.65, FOR EXAMPLE, ARE TO BE UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN 917.65. 7. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG THE CURB -LINE INDICATE THE ELEVATION OF THE GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. NO LANDSCAPED SLOPES ARE TO EXCEED 3:1 (3 FEET HORIZONTAL TO 1 FOOT VERTICAL) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS SHALL NOT HAVE SLOPES IN ANY DIRECTION THAT EXCEED 2%. 10. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM BUILDINGS AT ALL TIMES. 11. UPON COMPLETION OF THE GRADING AND UTILITY WORK, THE DEVELOPER SHALL CERTIFY THAT ALL GRADING AND UTILITY WORK WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH H AN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND DISTRIBUTION. E A APPROVED GRADING AND UTILITY PERMITS. AN AS BUILT GRADING UTILITY PLAN CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING. THE CITY AND WATERSHED WILL 12. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, ALL NECESSARY EROSION C ( ) INSPECT THE SITE TO DETERMINE ITS SUITABILITY FOR BUILDING ACTIVITIES. IF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN INSTALLED AT THIS POINT, IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO WITHHOLD BUILDING PERMITS FOR VARIOUS LOTS TO ALLOW THE CONTRACTOR ADEQUATE SPACE TO PERFORM THIS WORK. 13. ALL DEBRIS CREATED IN HE PROCESS OF CLEARING AND GRADING HREMOVED FROM THE SITE. THIS INCLUDES TREES AND SHRUBS. UNDER NOE SITE SHALL BE E CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THIS TYPE OF MATERIAL BE BURIED OR BURNED ON THE SITE. 14. THE INTENT IS TO STRIP AND SALVAGED TOPSOIL FOR POTENTIAL RE -SPREADING ON THE SITE, IF APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS. (SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL - AFTER COMPACTION - SHALL BE RE -SPREAD PRIOR TO SEEDING AND MULCHING. EXCESS TOPSOIL MAY BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE PROVIDING HERE IS ADEQUATE TOPSOIL REMAINING TO PROPERLY FINISH THE SITE AS NOTED ABOVE. THE TOPSOIL STRIPPING STOCKPILING AND RE -SPREADING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE TO, AND NOTED ON, THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY SPECIAL TOPSOIL OR PLANTING REQUIREMENTS. SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION STABILIZATION. TOPSOIL BORROW SHALL MEET MNDOT 3877-2 "LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW" AT A MINIMUM. 15. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE HE POTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM RUNNING OFF ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ANY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES MUST BE CORRECTED AND RESTORED AS SOON AS PERMISSION IS GRANTED FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS . 16. IF CONSTRUCTION OF HE SITE WORK PROCEEDS THROUGH THE WINTER MONTHS, ANY DISTURBE D AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE TO BE MINIMALLY PAVEMENTS ARE TO HAVE CLASS 5 BASE INSTALLED; ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO STABILIZED PRIOR TO MARCH 1, AS FOLLOWS: AREAS PLANNED TO RECEIVE PA , BE SEEDED, STRAW MULCH PLACED, AND DISC -ANCHORED. 17. WINTER MULCHING: 17.A. SNOW MULCHING SHALL BE DEFINED AS MULCH MATERIAL SPREAD OVER THE TOP OF SN OW SO THAT THE MULCH MELTS THROUGH THE SNOW AND STICKS TO THE EXPOSED SOILS. SPREAD OVER FROZEN GROUND. MULCH MATERIALS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE DISC -ANCHORING 17.B. FROZEN GROUND MULCHING SHALL BE DEFINED AS MULCH � MATERIAL S INTO HE SOIL MAY BE PLACED WITHOUT MODIFICATION. MULCH MATERIALS THAT REQUIRE DISC -ANCHORING MAYBE ANCHORED WITH HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZERS OR Q MAY BE FROZEN TO THE SOIL BY APPLYING WATER, AT A RATE OF 2000 GALLONS PER ACRE, OVER THE MULCH AS A SUBSTITUTION FOR DISC -ANCHORING. 18. RETAINING WALLS AND APPROPRIATE SAFETY FENCING ALONG THE TOP OF WALLS ARE TO BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. SUBMIT RETAINING WALL SHOP DRAWINGS TO PROJECT TEAM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT THE DISTURBED AREA AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 20. IF NECESSARY, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEWATERING. CONTACT THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY DEWATERING ACTIVITIES. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: U H LL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SITE GRADING OPERATIONS. HE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES S A NOTIFIED UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES AND WATERSHED DISTRICT MUST BE TIF AND PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION BEING COMMENCED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SCHEDULE A PRE -CONSTRUCTION GRADING MEETING ON -SITE WITH THE CITY AND WATERSHED DISTRICT. IF DAMAGED OR REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE RESTORED AND IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH DAY. 2. ANY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY OR WATERSHED; BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER THE GRADING ACTIVITIES, SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THEIR REQUEST. 3. CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, UTTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED. 4. NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. 5. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 (H: V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION. 6. NO DEVIATIONS SHALL BE MADE FROM THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN, WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE CITY. 7. FOR SITES GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRE, AS REQUIRED BY THE MPCA PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, THE PERMIT APPLICANT MUST KEEP AN EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION LOG. INSPECTION MUST BE MADE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EVERY RAIN EVENT. THE INSPECTION RECORD MUST BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CITY AND WATERSHED NTHIN 24 HOURS OF REQUEST. 8. FLOWS FROM DIVERSION CHANNELS OR PIPES (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT) SHALL BE ROUTED TO SEDIMENTATION BASINS OR APPROPRIATE ENERGY DISSIPATERS TO PREVENT TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO OUTFLOW TO LATERAL CONVEYORS AND TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION WHEN RUNOFF FLOWS INTO THESE CONVEYORS. 9. SITE ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE GRADED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCES, DIVERSION CHANNELS, OR DIKES AND PIPES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM EXITING THE SITE VIA THE ACCESS ROADS. SITE -ACCESS ROADS/DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE SURFACED NH CRUSHED ROCK WHERE THEY ADJOIN EXISTING PAVED ROADWAYS. 10. SOILS TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY MOTOR VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CLEANED DAILY FROM PAVED ROADWAY SURFACES, OR MORE FREQUENTLY IF REQUESTED BY CITY OR WATERSHED, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. - - - - 11. DUST CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PERFORMED PERIODICALLY WHEN CONDITIONS REQUIRE AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OR \ WATERSHED. 12. SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION II MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES (8 INCHES FOR t SINGLE-FAMILY HOME PROPERTIES) WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING FINAL R VEGETATION PRIOR TO I I L REVEGETATION NOR OTHER STABILIZATION. j 13. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE USED A CONSTRUCTION UNTILCOMPLETION ND MAINTAINED FOR HE DURATION OF SITE OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED i / BY THE DISTRICT, IF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR NATURAL EVENTS DAMAGE OR INTERFERE WITH THESE EROSION CONTROL -- - - - - - MEASURES, THEY SHALL BE RESTORED TO SERVE THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION AT THE END OF EACH DAY OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. 14. ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY AREAS WHICH DRAINAGE SWALE (TYP.) HAVE BEEN FINISHED GRADED OR AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN DISTURBED AND FOR WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING WITN 2.0% AND 5.0% MAX. GRADE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SET FORTH IN THE FOLLOWING - PARAGRAPHS WITHIN 48 HOURS: ----------------- f \\\I A EEDED AS SHALL BE R MULCHED DISC -ANCHORED FIBROUS BLANKETS SEEDS 1 LIMITSEROS ON.RETEMPORARY STR WE MU CH SHALLNBEDISC ANCHOREED AND PPL ED AT UN FORM RATE OFF NOT LESS AN TWO TONS PER ACRE AND NOT LESS THAN 80% COVERAGE. B. IF THE GRADED AREA IS ANTICIPATED TO BE RE-DISTURBED/DEVELOPED WITHIN SIX MONTHS, PROVIDE A TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE TOWNHOME COVER CONSISTING OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) SEED MIXTURE 21-111 (OATS), OR 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT), AT A RATE OF 100 POUNDS PER ACRE. C. IF GRADED AREA WILL NOT BE DEVELOPED FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN SIX MONTHS, PROVIDE A SEMI -PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER OF SEED MIXTURE MNDOT 22-112 AT A RATE OF 40 POUNDS PER ACRE. -------------� --� --- 1----� -' D. GRADING BONDS OR THE EQUIVALENT SECURITIES SHALL BE RETAINED UNTIL TURF HAS GERMINATED AND SURVIVED A 60-DAY GROWING PERIOD. LOCATION OF E. ALL AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE MOWED OR MAINTAINED AS PART OF HE ULTIMATE DESIGN WILL BE PERMANENTLY RESTORED USING FLOW DIVISION LINE -VARIES WITH SEED MIXTURE MNDOT 25-141 AT A RATE OF 59 POUNDS PER ACRE. ROAD GRADES F UNLESS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (I E ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN OR LANDSCAPE PLAN) SPECIFIED LOT PLAN ELEVATION PERMANENT TURF RESTORATION SHALL CONSIST OF MN/DOT SEED MIXTURE 25-131 (COMMERCIAL TURF GRASS) AT A RATE OF 220 POUNDS PER ACRE. G. WHENEVER OTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ARE INADEQUATE, TEMPORARY ON -SITE SEDIMENT BASINS THAT CONFORM TO THE CRITERIA FOR ON -SITE DETENTION BASINS SHALL BE PROVIDED. 11. RUNOFF SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS PROVIDING THEY ARE NOT NEEDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. WHERE STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS ARE NECESSARY FOR SITE DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION, A SILT FENCE OR SEDIMENT PROTECTION DEVICES AS DETAILED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AROUND ALL CATCH BASINS UNTIL HE TRIBUTARY AREA TO THE CATCH BASIN IS RESTORED. ELEVATION OF REAR 12. GRADING ACTIVITIES PROPOSED TO BEGIN AFTER OCTOBER 15 WILL REQUIRE AN APPROVED PHASING SCHEDULE. THE AREA OF LAND THAT LOT CORNER THE CITY WILL ALLOW TO BE DISTURBED AT THIS TIME OF YEAR WILL BE SEVERELY LIMITED. THE CITY WILL ALSO REQUIRE ADDITIONAL 2Gz MIN. EROSION CONTROL DEVISES, I.E., TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS, DORMANT SEEDING AND HIGH RATES OF APPLICATION OF BOTH SEED AND S.OR MULCH. MA Al 13. FILTER BLANKET AND RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDES OF ALL STORM SEWER OUTLETS 24 HOURS AFTER CONSTRUCTION AS INDICATED AND DETAILED. ALL RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A FILTER MATERIAL MEETING THE MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR RIPRAP AND FILTER MATERIAL. 14. EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF ALL LAKES, PONDS AND WETLANDS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE AREA TO BE GRADED UNTIL HE TRIBUTARY AREA TO THE LAKE, POND OR WETLAND IS RESTORED. 15. TO MINIMIZE EROSION, ALL 3:1 SLOPES SHALL BE COVERED WITH A MN/DOT 3885 CATEGORY 2 STRAW EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS OR STAKED SOD. 16. ACCUMULATION OF ALL SEDIMENT OCCURRING IN STORM SEWERS, DITCHES, LAKES, PONDS AND WETLANDS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO, DURING AND AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES. GRADING) 17. EROSION CONTROL ITEMS AND DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONLY AFTER THE AREA HAS RECEIVED FINAL STABILIZATION OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY AND/OR WATERSHED. 18. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST. 'U z U W H Uy �i LW a+ W A a V Z n o F-- O <LLI S w ON Q Z pw n �am0 cz 0 10p _ 0 U w Z a l Z N O F- \0 Ef Ef w U)C7 01 0, a w Z (` a CL 00 w O 0, per, Gq�o=X O d N Do d W O IIIIII 00 n �0o co O N LO a �3Zaoz ZVI W u, DO r0 c0 00 U a E z 2 O N ch L s 3s coaa) F, € z w m z w M W cm c 17 E �ii o�n Lm " U O�wg r m o 0 w w z Q O Q Z � N a aO cn w - w - •O O a o� �LL O NaO o Z g w w _ 0 C H � T T � � O � � w Q w m o co w Q 0 Q� i n T U B w Z j U w m z 0 I- 2:w Q04 S Lil U wwwQC7LL YH 1_ 1- p = V1 : W O Y 0 V I LU LU J L:J-LLI < N Li Z z �z 0 CC` ZLLJ v ' r- Q v , O Z = V GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM C100 PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - - - - - - - - SILTATION FENCE )E 3E BE PROPERTY LINE - - SAWCUT LINE (APPROX.) PROPOSED CONTOUR �- DRAIN TILE---i--- STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL CATCH BASIN ■ Q4 907.1 �\ TC ti hU1 y, s + 907.3 77CC9.0 90 H7.8 gg 908.7 • 908.5 OR 9007.4 soa.e BITUMINOUS 907.E BTL o.°p06 909.2 T AM goo. ° \\ I 4f\ CONIC•90d2 9 a s 3 9 c 0 � HYD 9 .25� HCR 4 W 09.60 A�o0`oa 908.7 08.2 T(� 4 07.9 12 RCP t �'., • ST 5 10.1 �\=J � 9� 5 T j "1 9 3 . 91d.2 0 rC� 0B 908.7 '� 106 p / TIC O h� 909. 9 A� `J^ x'6 J TC TC MANHOLE g 0°090� "Rc 2 i oss L os.z t` �.�� . 910.7 FLARED END SECTION , /r GQ TC 1 ❑3 0.o s T FLARED END SECTION APPROXIMATE DISTURBED AREA / d017 WITH RIPRAP IS 8.64 ACRES /� / 1.0 EROSION CONTROL �i Tc sliz 910.7 01-9 1 os i /yDA 5 2 ° �� T (� 11.6 00 i / lW ON �0 k`00 BLANKET (TEMPORARY) O 5S 5 /c / �(� pRL 908. EROSION CONTROL B0 P i.z 9�7 6 pI \ s e � � � °� INV. �5.18 BLANKET (PERMANENT) \ j 11.9 ti+ su.o/ „ OF su.6 . \\ 4 \ s ROCK CONSTRUCTION il TC TIC 9O'�F� 1.5 / 4 ENTRANCE C \ s11�60 �✓il`O A� ��" Z \ 9/ orc DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW \ r\ � TI OJ / 9C RETAINING WALL SPOT 1. ELEVATION ®�• I s12.o oO�G slls /\.tip �" 2 ' ,, 87 PRTM "MO OPOSED:2.6 0.3 r c 0ti� TC a SPOT ELEVATION �. I s • r\J\~ � � � ♦ 4 '�" 4.6 4.7 4.7 -s I,. SOIL BORING J S;Iu: IB-1 4.5 it <i / 2.1SiF W 12.6 13 00 CONCRETE WASHOUT rc conceErE Tc AREA W.O. AREA J\ s!2.z 1oQ�. a° /x 13. 42 � 3.5 B G �� 911, �*9157 � W 1 nl) / Ell 3.7 "NOTE: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE ANTICIPATED rc TO BE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE �� A\e a RCP 91Ip/ / �I¢ 916s \ ` ` 4 4 3.7 4 4'1 SHOWN. v / T r �� x ;; 1+• 3.4 �.� /\ \ T13.3 9yLz// 5.0 4.1 3.9 TR 2.5 X 911.7/ / \ �,9g.0 o's' T7� 5 /Z /�� x•yti 6. t 53 z PE 5 5.5 4.5 3.8 4 2.7 / 3.1 0 �J TC x 9 2 4.D �\� / Ls / /// sus /' S.5 9 O_ 4.6 t EOF 3.3 NOTE: / �O �%' 91 2 s x sl 3. , y p' 3.5 s 3.4 STORM SEWER INLETS NOT SHOWN ON PLAN MAY � \ s z.3 6.2 / r \ y C'9 912.2// �9I5/ i RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. \J T�3.s OJT' F/ INSTALL INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION PER DETAIL l 2/C400 ON ALL STORM INLETS THAT MAY RECEIVE /\� / y/�,,q� f�•sls 62 _ 75 6 6 •+.'' / / • /_9� RUNOFF. 3/ 0 � / // y, 91 a 7 h �� / •� V ' 4 PEi) ABBREVIATIONS BLDG Building BM Bench Mark BW Bottom of Wall CB Catch Basin CONC Concrete ELEV Elevation EX Existing FFE Finished Floor Elevation HWL High Water Level INV Invert LIFE Lower Floor Elevation MAX Maximum MH Manhole MIN Minimum PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe TW Top of Wall W.O. Washout f. I•hite � - r - � � ,rt� f •n i IN ,' ©/ 1/ III ` • f�• �, �f'" f�•:Y :% „��;;I�� / i ��� 914.2 TC f Y I f I GPxGAS V ''T 909.7 GP GP Vg • . f r ) f• i • -I f: , ' 1 i •/ / f• , \ i D• I r 11 . 'tl 4.3 914.4 i x i / �• Dr 1i i L / iTC/ f S • 11 Y -7 Y • •Y• •11 1 / I r 4n v 1 ' K v r �► _ • R r i ► �� i •� ,� wit /. 911-7 r r s •r v n r pta Y 1 / 1 I � •©' �-vy� �� v�•i `:� via i 'III •. �► _ �, , 913.9 • / `. • 1 . 1 ^ 1 1'I , 1, '. •�' �/ vim[! a w./ %I v •• 1 I 1 i ©I I �� 4'j1i:! .� y . 1 ��;I�iI C�•r SSJ \ vy�,:, .I � 0, � �1 II i fl�i). f f(ljr ,1 \� .'vju vim•' ,,.�1 �.ffi�� // - ,' 1` 0�4.50 FAX - '��R►S�V flu � S �„�'�-��i%� � vim• ! � ,' s w"` I I v •fin • f�[It Cam` ..f[c�i) �f�.[•> v o t� - ; ` X 9 .. 'w•1 is P.ru': P.M.4� f�•) 1g �. „ �,v4u �► I 917 TC 917 TO i i1 •` �, •• v�j•, s v n 1•:�••© rIGI! ./ I :�"�\ .�. ems, V�•/ �j I � � ' R, ..., ` I >. ... . •.•,� ..�Y4► � � . v chi o �� + �- • • : r.: • 'L. C.B► I g�i. taL.I7.iiL.. ' �`44►•� '^+ -,-.r.,,'+�r.•�,© `� �V�i - v :/ � . r,. TO VVI 917, TC IRV 918. TIC 918. .�'O: n,.•��► cif I•IA �.,��� �. /�'. • .: 'LLi\, ar •ttT)1+�,�„• ► ff"f••�.�♦�\ �►�lr\r„�q i.m „���♦Yi►•© r{ �� .�� .'•'emu - „, L. •' , ' .. nnrr�ra.,. ,. f �i•1� -_ - ., ®�11!'.rvs .�. ��tGji/ �.+.,�.,....� :i , ... : CB TCP=913.9 INV=89L5 L"2 INV=8 .6 \• 910.6\ HYD TICS 910.4 ® TO 110.6 .910.2 rc � 0 5/ 5P� sl0.s �xs1o.8 rc SA TOP= 1018 910.6 rc 23 KEYED NOTES KEYED NOTES ARE DENOTED BY NO ON PLAN. �1 INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. REFER TO DETAIL 1/C400. �2 INSTALL SILT FENCE USING ORANGE FABRIC. REFER TO DETAIL 4/C400. �3 INSTALL INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION. REFER TO DETAIL 2/C400. ® INSTALL MN/DOT 3885 CATEGORY 2 TEMPORARY STRAW FIBER EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. INSTALL MN/DOT 3885.2B.5 CATEGORY 1 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT. ADDITIONAL PERIODIC MAINTENANCE MAY BE REQUIRED AT OVERFLOW AREAS. © FILTRATION BASIN AND WATER QUALITY TREATMENT PONDS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE BEGINNING OF GRADING OPERATIONS. FILTRATION BASINS ARE TO BE ROUGH GRADED AND SURROUNDED WITH SILT FENCE PER DETAIL 4/C400. REFER TO DETAIL 1/C402, 2/C402, 3/C402, 4/C402 , AND 5/C402 FOR FILTRATION BASIN CROSS SECTIONS. ALL TRIBUTARY AREAS MUST BE STABALIZED PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION OF STORMWATER TO THE FILTRATION BASINS. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IN FILTRATION AREAS IS NOT ALLOWED AFTER AREA HAS BEEN EXCAVATED. IF AREA BECOMES COMPACTED. LOOSEN SOIL WITH MECHANICAL TILLER PRIOR TO FINAL STABILIZATION. FILTRATION AREAS ARE NOT APPROVED BORROW SITES AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT BASINS INFILTRATE AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 1-INCH PER HOUR USING A PERCOLATION TEST ON ALL BASINS BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE. PERCOLATION TEST SHALL BE SIGNED BY A REGISTERED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND ENGINEER FOR REVIEW BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL ❑j APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEMPORARY CONTAINED CONCRETE WASH OUT BIN. REFER TO THE MINNESOTA'S NPDES/SDS GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR MORE DETAILS. SELF CONTAINED CONCRETE WASHOUTS ON CONCRETE DELIVERY TRUCKS IS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO ON -SITE CONTAINMENT. REFER TO DETAIL 3/C400. 0 INSTALL MONUMENT SIGN. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. 0 40' 20' 0 40' 80' FM iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil!!Si-m�� SCALE in = 40' RETAINING WALL NOTES: 1. ALL TOP AND BOTTOM ELEVATIONS CORRESPOND TO THE RESPECTIVE GRADE ELEVATIONS ON EACH SIDE OF THE WALL. 2. THE BOTTOM ELEVATION IS THE ELEVATION OF THE LOW-GRADE SIDE OF THE WALL, NOT THE TOP ELEVATION OF THE BURIED BLOCK COURSE. 3. ALL RETAINING WALLS SHALL HAVE PROTECTIVE FENCING AT THE TOP WHERE THE VERTICAL HEIGHT EXCEEDS 30 INCHES. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A MINNESOTA LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF WALL. WALKWAY NOTES: 1. GRADING CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR SO THAT ALL STEPS AND LANDINGS ARE SLOPED PER CODE. 2. ALL SIDEWALK LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE SLOPES ARE TO BE PER CODE. T09.9SAN GRADING NOTES: 9 / TOP-909.6 °z Nv=sa7.a-1, 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE, REVIEW ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND FIELD VERIFY THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING. NO ADDITIONAL 1j 2 _TC COMPENSATION WILL BE GIVEN FOR WORK THAT COULD HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED BY A SITE VISIT OR CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT REVIEW. `9 3 S0 809, 09.4 s08.7 2. THE BACKGROUND INFORMATION WAS PREPARED BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING. CONTACT LEONARD F. CARLSON AT (952) 881-2455. .Y �/ 3. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION, ELEVATION AND MARK \ 911\`&b ALL EXISTING UTILITIES 48 HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION STARTS. THE ENGINEER, ARCHITECT OR OWNER DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL THE UTILITIES ARE MAPPED, T89 COR IF MAPPED, ARE SHOWN CORRECTLY. CONTACT GOPHER ONE AT 651-454-0002 FOR FIELD LOCATING EXISTING UTILITIES. CONTACT UTILITY OWNER IF DAMAGE OCCURS s s. 909 2 9oa� � . DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. a \ _-� 910.2 4. PROTECT ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES WHICH ARE NOT SCHEDULED FOR REMOVAL. x os2 = 5. NOTIFY CITY BUILDING INSPECTOR BEFORE TRENCHING AND EXCAVATION WORK COMMENCES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS PRIOR TO START W 905.7 OF CONSTRUCTION. s05.8 w W 6. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN AS 17.65, FOR EXAMPLE, ARE TO BE UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN 917.65. 2 � WATER 7• ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG THE CURB -LINE INDICATE THE ELEVATION OF THE GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1 RILEY PURGATORY EROSION CONTROL NOTES: d 905.6 "q W A.NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST 8. NO LANDSCAPED SLOPES ARE TO EXCEED 3:1 3 FEET HORIZONTAL TO 1 FOOT VERTICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ( ) 9os.s 9. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS SHALL NOT HAVE SLOPES IN ANY DIRECTION THAT EXCEED 2%. BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT 10. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM BUILDINGS AT ALL TIMES. POSSIBLE. 11. UPON COMPLETION OF THE GRADING AND UTILITY WORK THE DEVELOPER SHALL CERTIFY THATALL GRADING AND UTILITY WORK WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH B.ADDITIONAL MEASURES SUCH AS HYDRAULIC THE APPROVED GRADING AND UTILITY PERMITS. AN AS -BUILT GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND DISTRIBUTION. MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY 12. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING. THE CITY AND WATERSHED WILL THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 INSPECT THE SITE TO DETERMINE ITS SUITABILITY FOR BUILDING ACTIVITIES. IF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN INSTALLED AT THIS POINT , IT MAY BE NECESSARY (H:V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE TO WITHHOLD BUILDING PERMITS FOR VARIOUS LOTS TO ALLOW THE CONTRACTOR ADEQUATE SPACE TO PERFORM THIS WORK. STABILIZATION. 13. ALL DEBRIS CREATED IN THE PROCESS OF CLEARING AND GRADING THE SITE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. THIS INCLUDES TREES AND SHRUBS. UNDER NO C.FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THIS TYPE OF MATERIAL BE BURIED OR BURNED ON THE SITE. THAT AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR 14. THE INTENT IS TO STRIP AND SALVAGED TOPSOIL FOR POTENTIAL RE -SPREADING ON THE SITE IF APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS. ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD AND INCORPORATED (SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL - AFTER COMPACTION - SHALL BE RE -SPREAD PRIOR TO SEEDING AND MULCHING. EXCESS TOPSOIL MAY BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE PROVIDING THERE IS ADEQUATE TOPSOIL REMAINING TO PROPERLY FINISH THE SITE AS NOTED ABOVE. THE TOPSOIL STRIPPING STOCKPILING AND RE -SPREADING SHALL Q TREATMENT WHEREVER TOPSOIL HAS BEEN BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE TO AND NOTED ON THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY SPECIAL TOPSOIL OR PLANTING REQUIREMENTS. SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON REMOVED. COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, n.' D.CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION STABILIZATION. TOPSOII. HORROR SHALL MEET MNDOT 3877-2 "LOAM TOPSOIL BUILDING MATERIALS CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT BORROW" AT A MDVIMTTM. CHEMICALS LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUST BE 15. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROPERLY MANAGED. PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM RUNNING OFF ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ANY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES MUST BE CORRECTED AND RESTORED AS SOON AS E.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMISSION IS GRANTED FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS . ( ) BMPS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED 16. IF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SITE WORK PROCEEDS THROUGH THE WINTER MONTHS, ANY DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE TO BE MINIMALLY SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, STABILIZED PRIOR TO MARCH 1, AS FOLLOWS: AREAS PLANNED TO RECEIVE PAVEMENTS ARE TO HAVE CLASS 5 BASE INSTALLED; ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE SEEDED, STRAW MULCH PLACED, AND DISC -ANCHORED. AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT. 17. WINTER MULCHING: FALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 17.A. SNOW MULCHING SHALL BE DEFINED AS MULCH MATERIAL SPREAD OVER THE TOP OF SNOW SO THAT THE MULCH MELTS THROUGH THE SNOW AND STICKS TO THE BMPS MUST BE REMOVED UPON FINAL EXPOSED SOILS. STABILIZATION. 17.B. FROZEN GROUND MULCHING SHALL BE DEFINED AS MULCH MATERIAL SPREAD OVER FROZEN GROUND. MULCH MATERIALS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE DISC -ANCHORING G.SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION INTO THE SOIL MAY BE PLACED WITHOUT MODIFICATION. MULCH MATERIALS THAT REQUIRE DISC -ANCHORING MAYBE ANCHORED WITH HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZERS OR AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF MAY BE FROZEN TO THE SOIL BY APPLYING WATER, AT A RATE OF 2000 GALLONS PER ACRE, OVER THE MULCH AS A SUBSTITUTION FOR DISC -ANCHORING. CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH 18. RETAINING WALLS AND APPROPRIATE SAFETY FENCING ALONG THE TOP OF WALLS ARE TO BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF SUBMIT RETAINING WALL SHOP DRAWINGS TO PROJECT TEAM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 18 INCHES (8 INCHES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY HOME 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT THE DISTURBED AREA AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. PROPERTIES) WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID 20. IF NECESSARY, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEWATERING. CONTACT THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY DEWATERING ACTIVITIES. UTILITIES TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING EROSION CONTROL NOTES: VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR 1. ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SITE GRADING OPERATIONS. THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OTHER STABILIZATION. AND WATERSHED DISTRICT MUST BE NOTIFIED UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES H.ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AND PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION BEING COMMENCED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SCHEDULE A PRE -CONSTRUCTION GRADING MEETING ON -SITE WITH THE CITY AND WATERSHED DISTRICT. IF DAMAGED OR REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL EROSION WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER LAND -DISTURBING CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE RESTORED AND IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH DAY. WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON A PROPERTY THAT DRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED 2. ANY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY OR WATERSHED; BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER THE GRADING ACTIVITIES, SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THEIR REQUEST. WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS ELSEWHERE. 3. CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY I. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, WASTE MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED. MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 4. NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND 5. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY OF 3:1 (H: V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION. HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST 6. NO DEVIATIONS SHALL BE MADE FROM THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN, WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST CITY. WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. 7. FOR SITES GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRE, AS REQUIRED BY THE MPCA PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, THE PERMIT APPLICANT MUST KEEP AN EROSION THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES CONTROL INSPECTION LOG. INSPECTION MUST BE MADE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EVERY RAIN EVENT. THE UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE INSPECTION RECORD MUST BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CITY AND WATERSHED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF REQUEST. DISTRICT ON REQUEST. 8. FLOWS FROM DIVERSION CHANNELS OR PIPES (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT) SHALL BE ROUTED TO SEDIMENTATION BASINS OR m APPROPRIATE ENERGY W TO LATERAL CONVEYORS N DISSIPATERS TO PREVENT TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO OUTFLOW VE ORS AND TO PREVENT J 0' EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION WHEN RUNOFF FLOWS INTO THESE CONVEYORS. 9. SITE ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE GRADED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCES, DIVERSION CHANNELS, OR DIKES AND PIPES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM EXITING THE SITE VIA THE ACCESS ROADS. SITE -ACCESS ROADS/DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE SURFACED WITH CRUSHED ROCK WHERE THEY ADJOIN EXISTING PAVED ROADWAYS. 10. SOILS TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY MOTOR VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CLEANED DAILY FROM PAVED ROADWAY SURFACES, OR MORE FREQUENTLY IF REQUESTED BY CITY OR WATERSHED, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. I -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---_�___�____ 11. DUST CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PERFORMED PERIODICALLY WHEN CONDITIONS REQUIRE AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OR v\ WATERSHED. 12. SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES (8 INCHES FOR I TOWNHOME i SINGLE-FAMILY HOME PROPERTIES) WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHER STABILIZATION. I 13. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL I LL BE USED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF SITE CONSTRUCTION UNTIL COMPLETION I OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED +---+ j +---+ , BY THE DISTRICT. IF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR NATURAL EVENTS DAMAGE OR INTERFERE WITH THESE EROSION CONTROL -- --- ---- - MEASURES, THEY SHALL BE RESTORED TO SERVE THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION AT THE END OF EACH DAY OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. 14. ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED AS SOON AS POSSrBLE. ANY AREAS WHICH DRAINAGE SWALE (TYP.) WITH 2.0% AND 5.0% MAX. GRADE HAVE BEEN FINISHED GRADED OR AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN DISTURBED AND FOR WHICH GRADING OR SITE BULDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SET FORTH IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPHS WITHIN 48 HOURS: EEDED AREASR MULCHED DISC -ANCHORED OR BY FIBROUS BLANKETS PROTECT \\\I A EEDS AND THAN T TEMPORARY STRAW MULCH SHALLND LIMITSEROS ON BE DISC -ANCHORED ANDVERED APPLIED AT UN FORM RATE OF NOL SS TWO TONS PER ACRE AND NOT LESS THAN 80% COVERAGE. I B. IF THE GRADED AREA IS ANTICIPATED TO BE RE-DISTURBED/DEVELOPED WITHIN SIX MONTHS, PROVIDE A TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE TOWNHOME COVER CONSISTING OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) SEED MIXTURE 21-111 (OATS), OR 21-112 (WINTER I WHEAT), AT A RATE OF 100 POUNDS PER ACRE. 1 I C. IF GRADED AREA WILL NOT BE DEVELOPED FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN SIX MONTHS, PROVIDE A SEMI -PERMANENT VEGETATIVE I--- 1 COVER OF SEED MIXTURE MNDOT 22-112 AT A RATE OF 40 POUNDS PER ACRE. I- I 1 ---------- ---� -- --- -----_/� D. GRADING BONDS OR THE EQUIVALENT SECURITIES SHALL BE RETAINED UNTIL TURF HAS GERMINATED AND SURVIVED A 60-DAY -' GROWING PERIOD. OCATION OF E. ALL AREAS THAT WALL UQI BE MOWED OR MAINTAINED AS PART OF THE ULTIMATE DESIGN WILL BE PERMANENTLY RESTORED USING LINE- VARIES WITH SEED MIXTURE MNDOT 25-141 AT A RATE OF 59 POUNDS PER ACRE. I ROAD GRADES PLAN F. UNLESS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (I.E. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN OR LANDSCAPE PLAN), PERMANENT TURF RESTORATION SHALL CONSIST OF MN/DOT SEED MIXTURE 25-131 (COMMERCIAL TURF GRASS) AT A RATE OF 220 POUNDS PER ACRE. G. WHENEVER OTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ARE INADEQUATE, TEMPORARY ON -SITE SEDIMENT BASINS THAT CONFORM TO THE CRITERIA FOR ON -SITE DETENTION BASINS SHALL BE PROVIDED. � 11. RUNOFF SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING AL STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS PROVIDING THEY ARE NOT NEEDED DURING U SPECIFIED LOT CONSTRUCTION. WHERE STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS ARE NECESSARY FOR SITE DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION, A SILT FENCE OR ELEVATION SEDIMENT PROTECTION DEVICES AS DETAILED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AROUND ALL CATCH BASINS UNTIL THE TRIBUTARY E EVATION OF AREA TO THE CATCH BASIN IS RESTORED. HH TOWNHOME i LOT CORNER ELEVATION OF REAR 12. GRADING ACTIVITIES PROPOSED TO BEGIN AFTER OCTOBER 15 WILL REQUIRE AN APPROVED PHASING SCHEDULE. THE AREA OF LAND THAT 7"-6" MIN. LOT CORNER THE CITY WILL ALLOW TO BE DISTURBED AT THIS TIME OF YEAR WILL BE SEVERELY LIMITED. THE CITY WILL ALSO REQUIRE ADDITIONAL FINISHED FLOOR 2Oy EROSION CONTROL DEVISES, I.E., TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS, DORMANT SEEDING AND HIGH RATES OF APPLICATION OF BOTH SEED AND M ------- -- - -- s.O> IA/ MULCH. 13. FILTER BLANKET AND RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDES OF ALL STORM SEWER OUTLETS 24 HOURS AFTER 2X MIN. TO 57. MAX. SWALE GRADE CONSTRUCTION AS INDICATED AND DETAILED. ALL RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A FILTER MATERIAL MEETING THE MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR RIPRAP AND FILTER MATERIAL. I SETBACK DEPTH OF HOUSE 14. EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF ALL LAKES, PONDS AND WETLANDS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE AREA TO BE GRADED UNTIL THE TRIBUTARY AREA TO THE LAKE, POND OR WETLAND IS RESTORED. ELEVATION 15. TO MINIMIZE EROSION, ALL 3:1 SLOPES SHALL BE COVERED WITH A MN/DOT 3885 CATEGORY 2 STRAW EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS OR STAKED SOD. 16. ACCUMULATION OF ALL SEDIMENT OCCURRING IN STORM SEWERS, DITCHES, LAKES, PONDS AND WETLANDS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO, DURING AND AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES. 2 LOT BENCHING DETAIL ROUGH GRADING 17. EROSION CONTROL ITEMS AND DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONLY AFTER THE AREA HAS RECEIVED FINAL STABILIZATION OR AS DIRECTED 00 NOT TO SCALE BY THE CITY AND/OR WATERSHED. 18. THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST. 'U z U U W z Wy W V Z M 'r) w W Q Q a z r N Q Z_ O w Ln �UNM0 04LLJ Z O Z If per, Z (DLo F-'0 CRQ N (D - 0, a Lu O4 Z C' O• w RCN �0,av' Ovvn Ln o W O o ,_ = X � Cn no d o y s� > 0) 6 �IIIIII��I I� M o -�� �I L � � O N � g, I � 3 Z a o° s a o�mMZ w c� a 2 m v_icom ° o� a E z C7 - C9 °`I`°c; co C co ro .. m � 6 z w Z cc�co W n N occ"��' m .� g �V coil LL m > R ., , 0J @,v T m 0 w H z O N O 10 10 10 F � w ��Noo 0 F V Z O g w � a w w w � v w 0 J � a T � � O m O � � w ' Q H O w Q Z O w K w - o � V Z w Q 0 W- 11� Z v w m - � - Z Q a _ Z � d Z w w Q Wz 0 w � V I F- N W Q LLj 0 (cy-~/) LLJ Z CzC < 0 CO Z w N n (j^) Q C J O Z U GRADING, D RAI NAG E, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN -PHASE 2 PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM C101 f e PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - - - - - - SILTATION FENCE aE K PROPERTY LINE - - - SAWCUT LINE (APPROX.) PROPOSED CONTOUR -� DRAIN TILE---�--- STORM SEWER j-3il, �11 RETAINING WALL ABBREVIATIONS BLDG Building BM Bench Mark CB Catch Basin CONC Concrete ELEV Elevation EX Existing FFE Finished Floor Elevation HWL High Water Level INV Invert LFE Lower Floor Elevation MAX Maximum MH Manhole MIN Minimum PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe HYD N TTCC gg LL x 908.j''LAn �b 909.0 908.7 x 908.5 x 7 so 13TL BITUMINOUS a°0g9� 909.28\ TC 7�/ 09.1 x 908.6 \ CONC x 90$,2 0 pp 09.60 Oha^ 908.7 OB 2 T(B 9C /2" RCP �d joaao 4' ST S, 9 TC - / TC 3 S gO0 908,9 • 91�.2 �90 � 908.7 , 907.1 y s TC y� B 907.3 907, HCR 907.4 907.6 O �° TC /pok h� 909 69 + - -a, CATCH BASIN ■ ® P9ok fC {�3 s RG V np TC Tc cns v MANHOLE n �,�<cr x910.7 � ° ,\ os.2 s�®os.7 FLARED END SECTION , ��) GoZG2- rc•1 lo� a`° xs s� i �i�//907.3\ xFT�, Jc\ \ a G, APPROXIMATE IRRIGATION AREA l07 FLARED END SECTION IS 3.20 ACRES / 7 / r WITH RIPRAP / / 1.0 9os TPION o9 +a RECOMMENDED \ �� TC1.6 x 9112 910.7 0\° 9 / 0/ 9 °' 9O9 IRRIGATION AREA \ 5t5 /c x 1.2 Y�11. 0 zl 9088(��i/ / °9� c .0 TC 91�0..0�0.1 *NOTE: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE ANTICIPATED �G? / QP�ygll.s PI 7 i �'-'1871 \\\ 9OA �` CDs\ 2 911.0/ k / s TC x 909.6 .-'+. HYD TO BE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE \ J Il.s `<• G / / s r J TC / TO J�Ox 1.5 /s SHOWN. \ 9 >� ei + q 9TC 1 x 91 I.6 �O \x j \ er ,j/ f „ 910.8 T ® 91 TC ��\ Iz.2 J�0 h +/ m,,m_ °oT° G \slo.6 0.6 x910.2 k. S \ rc m \ 0 �F c / Tlc' S F°G 90ar __ x so . I / s x 0.2 1.5 0 �G0, \�OJ z 2.0 / .�. / rOs ,ofiS \ 9Tc 910.6 -I 126 x 912.0 GO 911.5 /\/.�'M 0`ryO a.7 I 11 0-1 / / 1'0 5 x s 10.8 TC \ TC TC 0ti� 9 �t 4 ,� x 908.4 1 "I' B Gc 9 T�-♦ WV 5A 910.6 t' c�`. j ,� 3� i 910.6 /+ 1 Is i� / I I>/ S � qe G ♦ INV-810.6 TC t ,8 910.3 do '�` o P 5 910.6 / k lea'1STR 1#20 05P�., rc / 911.7 \ TC e / 9`0'S 0�' TC / / �,�. 910.7 ♦ 910.6 J x9yz.z ��,,9 /x 1341 \ lift' \ c Ic nvPy oc T102 /s157 Ytstrit i` ''-,'�'3 \ 1Q'8 .n c+. TC 1 \ 13.3 x Tc k � / 9 a 7 1 sus STR • / ,-- .H CIF o'G,P / g• sti s11.7/ /}/ fy, s T O soe. /)��N'�lal �sfl7 „d ty,..x / w� To9.95AN rc iC a / \� / 9�1 / // +r 818.2 3`2 ' R 2 , n„ 'gip TOP=909.6 I r \ \ 1 / �, / 17.0 ` t'. INV=887.8 �. \ C)� / / 18.6 z 913 �c� z 9 / x @yyg 6 '�iC I/x �J\\ rc3.s J5 x�z.3 c.s s12.2// 94xs�syi _ / s o os.4 x sol 918, 9T7.9 \ \ \ 09.29TC 6.9 y�1I v,1it � 919 a H19. x 9i8-0 / "' \ V A •\x 910.2 x9l2 / / r9I6A 6i i#'x s1917 0�\_ '`ses.7 914. TOP-9 LY / /// .� .I (6` •� `W�� TC gINV�90 .1x92 13 - X905.7 ft`I t i 905.8 W 914.1 � su.�/ 12.a �� 1+/ �°• =9zo.4 WATER TC 1 O /CONC �ti'/ // - x // x s a' � �� � 905.6 i y� x 912.9 / 4 5// Mj `N eIC4.2 / TC' 912.�/�//// // -- - v X., P 912. //x 92 / x9 I.I 921. CB 914.3 TOP �� TC �V�902. G O�V x 13.2 / 9C2.3 �f4A// 922.2 9 �-- x 921.7 „, 1 9�4.3 /� g • �M/912.5 TO Tc ,4 / 7 /STRM #9 4,` `/► / / �� /%(y4! x 9p34 / x_ M L8'�92 / p „%12.j / „�j17.5 x924.E �� / / , •/ %%% � \ 91C4.s // 'Lp5 T��(/ C 4.� 914.7 / 913.6 J� // .. __ / ' 92 OP 2.A 6. 25.4 INV-909.4 oti //♦ II C� 9114.� / v v x926.4\ x9�4.3 / I � x92s. LIS 33// (p/ 9TCz�V .9 / j s2s.e q / � qq TC 5.1 !P °��/ x927.6�e / /T lu • x926.5 C B \ �j / kv ��91C. / / ,/ 2\ „926.6 // /9 {923.0 • 1 ///I 911.7 i' 0 915.2 .' TC �914.0/923.9I y • 7 / / / I �9/((/8/'/f� / 0 13.7 r ! / it a x927, 9 / / x923.7 C' 915.4 9113.5 y T/F 9.6 9 / 'r l TC / �& / ` 91 / \#G \ / d '` / / / x 922.9 f + . n #26%I \ \ x924.6:.;.20 /^f7 / 9i9.0 \26.3 27 �- / 0 I I xP � 962 Vl C) 13.7 / Jq� f \ \ \ \ 924.4 / / z $19 �CV C5.6 �TC m ! 91t. \ \ \ \ 92 /- i "" \ \ 913.9 <\ / \ \ \ �922.9 " 422.9` x 923.8 x 918 a \ \ / / �sza PROPOSED BUHMG /x I x9z1.6 -M 924.60 x9 .6 \ l I 9 CO va I /\ \ / �"Z4/ \ �.�)1.. 0` �922,1 2TC 915 8 \ a/5.3' is. .' � / .� .920.5_ x /AI x914.1 '(" I 8.9 -.x920011 x g\ � \ \ x9223.4, "'" x �. / x 92o.9 / LkI9,1 I / I r d (� 9160I 91{4.1 ,o / / \ \\ \ / / / -918Y -- ,�. \ I91198 sr 1 j. is�7. J TOP =9j3.9 / 1 \ -' �. \ \ .� \ i' �x917.0 \ \ I 0 / I ` �'916.8 INV:9 0,1 W s@gT-199 4 914 /Fr- \ \ \ / - / \ \ Is < TO TC x 915.1 x 91 .B ly �l I T _„, 914. \ \ \ -" --� -" \ \9 z 9 r6.6 ` n \ t W O I5. -� -. x`9 tS6 \ ..�-- .- `� � , II aid to y i O y1 - Z g14.7 s/� / M i \\ \ "` \ z916.5 .- \ \ .q qq I I xm TC O 1� 9 7 t{2 \ \ \ ..,` \ --'- / x n �\. _, \ z q{ S 915.#15 x 913. \ \ \ `3 _\�'� a 919.0 gC .7915.8 7C I / _ •\ \\ �\ �. j' x \ \ \ F i" 917.0 I ( 91 \ \ �rnlox_Ras917.0 �� TC 915.8 I I I / / / / / / Di--INV. 901.67 96- \ \ \ ! 917.1 TC / }_C------ - \ID.1 0 j J _. ,a 2 . TC x9�6.3 "- -' ., �' �i1e. �;:,,,• r.r,,:, �\. ---•-.'� .✓, j q 917.4 TC IUj TC m �'t,1II E ST 44.3\ L �oJ z918.5 1 �917.D 917.7 \916.9 TC TO JO" RAP . 8 Sr S` , , z 8 a_ _ _ - 90s.4 - _ 906.2 d907.9 1 / 910.3 x J S 917.9�I `� \ \\\� gagg`- .fi--�--�-- __- ram_ ._ ._ -. ` 09.5 x 909.3 918.1 TC' O _\ L \ \ M-go .0--�lt _sea.-o-=_ _. -- � -sr1-r9H- s11_i x T� rc TL =808- - 9B9 - - - - a- = x iss- - - - - - -_-_ - - - - -_- - - _ �altl@_ G R A S S sl .I sl$.z sns\ - =BiB -_ _ - - - - -=-sl+r= *91sx-= - - _ �p 9f4- _ - - ' 917.9 x 91 C.9 TCB x 6 '-'9/. - ghR - - - �_ .�-- �14.2-- J K919.0=/5._- -- �x�1T3 --_.x 910.8 918.0 ' BTL BTL 917.8 9rL-._-9f4- -_-_ --WOOD YVAL - _ _ - - - 917.7 TCBOX /gA9_SI 2 9+�a-.s 6-3/6_-at2� 9 -81 y�B .WWg -WWI WWR--' _9W �. -x9H:z xals.i�- HCR I8.0 TCS a17 - A1T4- - aNi �J18.4 -920:4 -_x 916.8 CONC .4 wws Pere y �Y x xs+s.i rsls.a 918.2 TC 920.0 �" 91Y9"7'- WB __915•a g1:Z7y� \ TC 91� 917 TRUNK H/GHWA Y NO. 212 WWB nenln�� >Il\I IT nr- Inin� ��1 n r NIn -7 1 V I I v L/ LJ I I\ I\ 7 l I \J V V /-\ I L_/-\ I cs TOP=913.9 INV=89I.5 / 1 1 IRRIGATION AREA PLAN 908.8 Tc z 40' 20' 0 40' 80' SCALE 1N = 407 'U z FI U U r�n7 CIO W Lx W W a Z r I- � ce < � l.J Q LO ILL!2 w n Q Z n N 0 � .gyp .MO U Or w Z p \0 O 0\ O, Z (DN 0 6 � w w 0 Z p 204 0N � N 00"iOa0, a 2 X o 0 poop CD 0 III N M O M > T o III n �FF IfJ X4 I c+O7N 8# 00 O O cr)FA 5 ' N 5 - Z Z Cl)g8 `M a o [L Ca z w (I) � C g m w mW cL �Y� cola im r, O s � z w O Z w Q O O Grp` tt // O d��o0 =�Htwi1 U` O�wg F-r5 T O � oo � w Z kcb w�o��or V Z w 'mLLD wz V O w d w w w w 7 LL z 0 N � O V w w 7 r O w w W = No LU Z z ~z_ 0 0 Q cw v , ' ) O Q V RRIGATION 4\REA PLAN PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM C 1-=40 C102 PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - - - - - - - - PROPERTY LINE - - - SAWCUT LINE----------- (APPROX.) SANITARY SEWER 3- WATER PIPE-�--}-� DRAIN TILE ---�--- STORM SEWER ?1 30 RETAINING WALL FIRE HYDRANT GATE VALVE H CLEANOUT • CATCH BASIN ■ REDUCER 0 MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION WITH RIPRAP SEWER INVERT ELEVATION *NOTE: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE ANTICIPATED TO BE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. ABBREVIATIONS BLDG Building BM Bench Mark CB Catch Basin CONC Concrete DIP Ductile Iron Pipe ELEV Elevation EX Existing FIFE Finished Floor Elevation INV Invert MAX Maximum MH Manhole MIN Minimum PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe RED Reducer RD Roof Drain L. INSTALL NEENAH CASTING R-1970 OR APPROVED EQUAL OVER PVC CLEANOUTS. SET CASTING SO THAT NO SURFACE LOAD IS TRANSMITTED TO THE RISER PIPE. FINISH GRADE MIN 5" TOPSOIL 4" THICK X 6" WIDE IIRI CONCRETE COLLAR H-1--�-{ 10-1 /7'f <I d I I�6" PVC RISER PIPE 6" 1/8 Bend 'ROPOSED SURFACE - INSTALL NEENAH CASTING R-1970 OR APPROVED EQUAL OVER PVC CLEANOUTS 3-INCHES BELOW PROPOSED GRADE. 4�,-BA01 6" RISER 6" 45 DEGREE, LONG RADIUS ELBOW 6" 45 - \ DEGREE BEND CLEANOUT IN IMPERVIOUS AREA CLEAP 4 DRAINTILE CLEANOUT 00 NOT TO SCALE '0 X / G / / 22 O 22 O / / STRM 25 23 / 0 23 • 25 1 24 I I O 23 STRM #24 T e 23 1 I 29 M #31 / 24 I 22 S M #4 * 26 Q 25 22 31 25 INV. 901.67 I 21 20 29 1 25 is 21 I I ' 20 STRM�02- 11 S #3 INV. 901.32 26 STRM #11 28 21 \ \\ FIL TION B 1 28 \ 23 25 (Ay \ 9O89 20 VRI #3 INV. 901.67 \ DT INV. 901.607 1 I \\ 28 INV. 901.09 � \ j 10 STRM #2 27 ' STRM #12 ------ EOF STRM #1, 21 21 C #25 WOOD WALL Al 0 23 • TC A s_, x s 9� C s / EDi FILTR BABA WL I 6" 5 DEGREE BEND 20 28 _ 2EA / --' IN\ i i #13 13 ,r `� 25 25] F2E PROPOSED BULDING FFE 924.50 LFE 913.50 11 ��I L CiT ® G►'�St�SI RILTARIF-31 ^l #14 STRM #1 H/GHWA Y NO. 212 1 UTILITY PLAN 20 1 =40 2 3 STRM I.►•�Sr�Tr:� I.Pl�.Sk�Y7 4 * I I L-'tjC\ II I1 \ iy�km\ �G #21' 113TRM 1#20 L -3 2B 1 } 4 1 25 / TTT ' I 20 1 i 20 I Iy I I o I 1 I 30 1 m txa20 I j S 21 1 . 91 4 24 1 t N 120 I I INV. 914.44 1 S#27 21 / ,1 .q TRM # 6 1 / I ' 1 / I / 1 EOF / I I STRM #1.SA* / i SIDE SLOPE FOR AREA I KEYED NOTES KEYED NOTES ARE DENOTED BY NO ON PLAN. N ❑j CONNECT TO EXISTING 8-INCH SANITARY SEWER STUB. INVERT IS BELIEVED TO BE 887.00. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ❑ INSTALL 2-45 DEGREE BENDS TO RAISE SANITARY SEWER AS INDICATED IN THE SANITARY SEWER TABLE. „`O� ❑ INSTALL 8" X 4" WYE FOR PROPOSED TOWNHOME SERVICE CONNECTION. REFER TO DETAIL 8/C400. ® STUB 4-INCH SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO WITHIN 5-FEET OF PROPOSED BUILDING. DESIGN COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION MATH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR y/\,\/ GRADE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. STUB 8-INCH SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO WITHIN 5-FEET OF PROPOSED BUILDING. y/j�/j ❑ COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR N PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. \\X 0 © CONNECT TO EXISTING 8-INCH WATER STUB WITH 8-INCH GATE VALVE. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 40 ^^+ nGo+ 0 40+ 80+ ❑ INSTALL 8" X 6" TEE. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND w COMPACTED 7 SPECIFICATIONS. i /�� ® m aa- BACKFILL ® INSTALL 8" X 8" TEE. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SCALE In = 401 SPECIFICATIONS. EX a o SOILSTURBED / UTILITY NOTES: > a INSTALL 6-INCH GATE VALVE PER DETAIL 12 C400. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 0. a 1. COORDINATE SERVICE CONNECTION LOCATIONS AT THE BUILDING WITH THE �_ w WATERMAIN 10 INSTALL 8-INCH POST INDICATOR VALVE PER DETAIL 3/C200. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS q Y o 4 \ O 0 5 SP11 JTIE TEE / MIN. OF TWO �4" DI DIA. RODSDS � 8" SEGMENT CONCRETE BLOCK NOTE: PIV SHALL MEET ALL STANDARDS OF LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT \ \ SAN TOP=909.6 \ INV=887.8 d'+ S9 P \ 2 c R SLOPE FOR AREA 7 WATER EOF • COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR UNCOORDINATED WORK. 11 INSTALL FIRE H ATE VALVE10/C400. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF A E PER 2. ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH LESS THEN 5 FEET OF COVER OVER THE ,DETAIL CHANHASSEN STANDARDS TOP OF PIPE ARE T E INSULATED. INSULATION SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM I RANIDNSPECIFICATIONS. TAIL 11/C400. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF THE CONNECTION OFTHESERVICE AT THE BUILDING TO THE POINT WHICH CHANHASSEN STANDARDS THE SERVICE ATTAINS 5 FEET OF COVER. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN TO 5-FEET OF PROPOSED BUILDING. WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION STUB 1.5-INCH TYPE K WATER SERVICE WITHIN OF INSULATION. / COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. PROTECT ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES WHICH ARE NOT /• 14 INSTALL 8-INCH 22 1/5-DEGREE BEND WITH THRUST BLOCKING. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED. CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. ALL SEWER AND WATER CROSSINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM VERTICAL CONCRETE INSTALL 6-INCH 45-DEGREE BEND WITH THRUST BLOCKING. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF SEPARATION OF 1.5 FEET AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET. FOLLOW BLOCKING 15 ALL HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND CARVER COUNTY CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. STANDARDS. 1g INSTALL 8" X 6" REDUCER. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND 5. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE C900 PVC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPECIFICATIONS. 6. ALL WATER MAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF COVER OF 7.5 FEET 17 STUB 8-INCH FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE TO WITHIN 5-FEET OF PROPOSED BUILDING. OVER TOP OF WATER MAIN. VALVE COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKING ON ALL WATER MAIN PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN. PROVIDE MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINTS ON ALL BENDS, VALVES, TEES, 18 STUB 6-INCH DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE TO WITHIN 5-FEET OF PROPOSED BUILDING. PLUGS AND HYDRANT LEADS. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. SANITARY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE PVC SDR 35 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1g CORE DRILL EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO RECEIVE 4" PVC DRAIN TILE. INVERT OF DRAIN 9. STORM SEWER PIPING SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP), UNLESS TILE SHALL BE 904.70.INSTALL 4" UPSTREAM CLAMP "CHECKMATE VALVE" BACKFLOW NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL 12-INCH THROUGH 18-INCH RCP STORM SEWER PIPE PREVENTOR OR APPROVED EQUAL. SHALL BE CLASS 5. RCP PIPE LARGER THAN 18-INCH SHALL BE CLASS 3 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE THAT IS EXTENDED TO 20 INSTALL DRAIN TILE FOR FILTRATION BASIN AS SHOWN ON PLANS. REFER TO 2/C100. THE BUILDING FOR ROOF DRAIN SERVICES IS TO BE PVC, SCHEDULE 40. 21 ❑ INSTALL FLARED END SECTION WITH RIPRAP PER DETAILS 15/C400 AND 1/C401. 10. ALL FLARED END SECTIONS ARE TO HAVE TRASH GUARDS, ALL DOWNSTREAM FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL HAVE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND RIPRAP PER 22 INSTALL DRAIN TILE AT LOW POINT CATCH BASIN PER DETAIL 12/C401 MNDOT STANDARDS, AS DETAILED. 11. CONTRACTORS ARE TO COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH GAS, ELECTRIC, Y3 INSTALL PERIMETER DRAIN TILE FOR BELOW GRADE STRUCTURES ONLY. REFER TO DETAIL TELEVISION AND TELEPHONE COMPANIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 10/C401. PROVIDE SOLID PIPE AND WATER TIGHT CONNECTIONS TO 10-FEET OF EITHER 12. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10-FEET OF SIDE OF ALL WATER CROSSINGS PER MN PLUMBING CODE. THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE P4 LOCATION OF PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN LEAD. REFER TO STORM SEWER TABLE FOR INVERT WITH MN PLUMBING CODE. ELEVATIONS AND PIPE SIZES. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION WITH 13. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GAS MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. TIGHT OR WATER TIGHT IN ACCORDANCE TO MN PLUMBING CODE. APPROVED 45 LOCATION OF PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR. REFER TO DETAIL RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATER TIGHT 13/C401. ALL STORM ROOF DRAIN DOWNSPOUT COLLECTORS SHALL BE 8-INCH SCH 40 CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. PVC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION GROUT RINGS ARE AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE. CEMENT MORTAR JOINTS MATH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ARE PERMITTED ONLY FOR REPAIRS AND CONNECTIONS OF EXISTING LINES 26 INSTALL SUMP CATCH BASIN PER DETAIL 9/C401. CONSTRUCTED WITH SUCH JOINTS. 27 INSTALL OUTLET STRUCTURE PER DETAIL 2/C200. UTILITY NOTES FOR WORK IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: 28 INSTALL DRAIN TILE CLEANOUT PER DETAIL 4/C200. 1. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND CARVER COUNTY STANDARDS AND 29 INSTALL UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION TANK WITH POTABLE WATER BACKUP. TANK CAPACITY SPECIFICATIONS. MUST BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 45,000 GALLONS. COORDINATE PUMP AND 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTORS ARE TO COORDINATE ALL WORK CONTROL INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY AND OBTAIN ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS. 30 INSTALL UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION TANK WITH POTABLE WATER BACKUP. TANK CAPACITY MUST BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 30,000 GALLONS. COORDINATE PUMP AND CONTROL INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. 31 INSTALL SUMP CATCH BASIN PER DETAIL 6/C402. 60" O.D. 1 /4" x 1 1 /4" FLAT STL. (4) 1/2" - 13 UNC HEX I HEAD STAINLESS STL. BOLTS 1/2" SMOOTH RND. STOCK WITH NUTS AND WASHERS 3 1/2" O.C. BOTH WAYS (2) 1 /4" X 1 1 /4" FLAT NOTES: 1. GRATE TO BE MADE IN (2) PIECES 2. ALL METAL SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. 2 POND OUTLET STRUCTURE 200 NOT TO SCALE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE NEENAH RIM INVERT ID DIMENSION CASTING ELEVATION ELEVATION(S) SUMP ELEVATION(S) PIPE LENGTH, DIAMETER, SLOPE & NEXT UPSTREAM STRUCTURE (INCHES) TYPE STRM #1 18" FES NA NA N = 894.97 NA 43 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 0.51%, STRM #2 STRM #2 48" CBMH SEE DETAIL 2/C200 907.75 S = 895.19 NA -------- N = 900.95 28 L.F. OF 4" PVC 0 0.50%, FILTRATION BASIN #1 DRAIN TILE STRM #3 24" FES NA NA N = 904.00 NA 15 L.F. OF 24" RCP 0 0.55%, STRM #4 S = 904.08 STRM #4 * 48" CBMH R-3067 909.99 N = 904.50 900.08 119 L.F. OF 15" RCP 0 5.27%, STRM #5 NE = 906.30 76 L.F. OF 10" PVC 0 1.01%, STRM #24 STRM #5 48" CBMH R-3067 915.74 S NE = 910.74 = 910.74 NA 48 L.F. OF 15" RCP 0 4.37%, STRM #6 STRM #6 48" CBMH R-3067 917.54 SW NE = 912.85 = 912.85 NA -------- 73 L.F. OF 15" RCP 0 1.00%, STRM #7 STRM #7 48" CBMH R-3067 921.02 SW NE = 913.58 = 913.58 NA 219 L.F. OF 15" RCP 0 1.00%, STRM #8 STRM #8 48" CBMH R-3067 921.74 SW N = 915.77 = 915.77 NA -------- 41 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 1.00%, STRM #9 STRM #g 48" CBMH R-3067 920.75 N = 916.18 NA 32 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 1.01%, STRM #10 STRM #10 24"CB 36 R-3067 919.75 S = 916.50 NA -------- STRM #11 * 48" MH R-1733 909.70 W = 904.20 g00.20 S = 904.44 40 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 1.00%, STRM #12 STRM #12 48" MH R-1733 908.90 N E = 904.84 = 904.84 NA 113 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 5.00%, STRM #13 W = 910.50 STRM #13 60" MH R-1733 917.00 E = 912.50 NA 56 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 5.33%, STRM #14 N = 913.00 42 L.F. OF 8" PVC 0 14.46%, S ROOF COLLECTION SYSTEM NE = 912.50 85 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 6.70%, STRM #15 STRM #14 48" CBMH R-2535 921.90 W E = 915.50 = 915.50 NA -------- 75 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 1.00%, STRM #14A STRM #14A 48" MH R-2535 920.75 W = 916.25 NA -------- STRM #15 27" CB R-2535 923.06 SW = 918.20 NA -------- STRM #16 12" FES NA NA SW - 917.50 NA 93 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 0.99%, STRM #16A* STRM #16A* 27" CB R-2535 921.40 NE = 918.42 914.42 -------- STRM #17 24" FES NA NA S = 906.70 NA 30 L.F. OF 18" RCP 0 0.40%, STRM #18 STRM #18 * 48" MH R-3067 g12.gg N SW = 906.82 = 906.92 902.82 -------- 82 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 0.40%, STRM #19 NE = 907.25 STRM #19 48" CBMH R-2535 912.50 SE = 907.35 NA 165 L.F. OF 4" PVC 0 0.45%, FILTRATION BASIN #3 DRAIN TILE E = 909.32 4 L.F. OF 4" PVC 0 0.51%, FILTRATION BASIN #4 DRAIN TILE STRM #20 12" FES NA NA E = 906.70 NA 27 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 1.50%, STRM #21 STRM #21 * 48" CBMH R-3067 911.10 SE = 907.110 903.10 -------- 30 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 1.33%, STRM #22 STRM #22 24"x36" CB R-3067 911.00 NW = 907.50 NA STRM #23 10" FES NA NA W = 917.50 NA 68 L.F. OF 10" PVC 0 0.50%, SW ROOF COLLECTION SYSTEM SW = 907.07 - ----- STRM #24 48" MH R-1733 913.30 N = 908.30 NA 31 L.F. OF 8" PVC 0 6.50%, NW ROOF COLLECTION SYSTEM S = 908.53 39 L.F. OF 8" PVC 0 1.50%, SW ROOF COLLECTION SYSTEM STRM #25 12' FES NA NA E = 895.00 NA 415 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 2.41%, STRM #26 STRM #26 48" MH R-1733 910.64 = 905.0 NA N N = 906.07 119 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 5.00%, STRM #27 STRM #27 48" CBMH R-2535 919.14 S = 91 NA N = 915..10 0 120 L.F. OF 4° HDPE 0 0.00%, FILTRATION BASIN #2 DRAIN TILE STRM #28 12" FES NA NA W = 911.00 NA 65 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 1.00%, STRM #29 * STRM #29 * 24"x36" CB R-3067 917.89 E = 911.65 907.65 -------- STRM #30 15" FES NA NA E = 904.00 NA 20 L.F. OF 15" RCP 0 0.98%, STRM #11 * STRM #31 IRRIGATION NA NA SE = 903.02 NA 25 L.F. OF 12" RCP 0 0.51%, STRM #32 TANK STRM #32 48"MHUMP R-4342 907.65 NW = 903.15 899.15 -------- • PROVIDE SUMP CATCH BASIN. REFER TO DETAIL 9/C401. SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE NEENAH RIM INVERT ID DIMENSION CASTING ELEVATION ELEVATIONS) PIPE LENGTH, DIAMETER, SLOPE & NEXT UPSTREAM STRUCTURE (INCHES) TYPE EXISTING STUB SSWR #1 AND 45 NA 887.73 SW = 887.00 21 L.F. OF 8" PVC 0 90.28%, SSWR #2 DEGREE BEND SSWR #2 45 DEGREE NA 901.76 NE = 901.03 BEND SW = 901.03 107 L.F. OF 8" PVC 0 1.00%, SSWR #3 SSWR #3 48" MH R-1733 914 .25 NE SW = 902.10 = 902.20 211 L.F. OF 8" PVC 0 2.08%, SSWR #4 SSWR #4 48" MH R-1733 920.50 = 90 S S = 906.68.68 150 L.F. OF 8" PVC 0 1.08%, SSWR #5 SSWR #5 48" MH R-1733 924.28 N S = 908.30 = 908.40 10 L.F. OF 8" PVC 0 1.01%, BUILDING CONNECTION (INV. 908.50) 'U z H U] U U z CAW W a co Z Q LO ~ v N w 0 <uj 2 a O Q O z r` cn Q Z_ O w NZN 04M0 �NZ0,uj OaZ 7 to 0 O�0o'C� 01 uj 00 w 0 01 0, a � S X v7 on a w 0 m m U) 0 �IpIIq�I �I o o �� v - s'• . U) II U) � N 0 a0 8 I!3Z a� Wo2ODZ m 6w U g Za)aN (m z o C " e �W cola LL mr R.9 U 0 4 OQ ~ O w O LL O ?00 O U z Es J ��Tt- O p 00 W O F w 0 SSQ D w Z ) 0 I m u_�- Z z w00 w Q a N H W O Z Y p r ^ V / V) W J LU N 0 y LLJ Z z �0 0 00 Z LLJ U-) r n V I Q O Z =v UTILITY PLAN PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM C200 PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS 21 4+52.84 5+55.57 6+58.44 93 5 5+00 ,5+5Q 6+00, 6+5Q 7+00 .7+50 ,J8+00 8+50 9+00 92. 92 927 92 92 92 923- 92 921 92 9196 91 917 916- 91 91 91 912- 911- 9909 908- 907- 906 905- 904 903- 90 90 900. 89 89 89 89 89 89 893- 89 89- 89- 888- 887- 886- 885- 884- 883- 882- 88 88 10+39.91 9+50 10+OQ --j 0+4� I NMI -a 09-11 ON 0 M M M M NONE ME 1 11 M In 1 1M miimmmimiimm Milo =moil NNE OMMINAIN IN ME I oil ME I mom 11110609111111 FIN No or In somom No NOUN NINON �!ld111�1��MOMMO 40ME ON OEM= No■■■IiINEEN `e� ■ ■■ Emil mom 1-mmolmo MOMERMS"N" 1 0 1 11 =In In MEMO M so M 0 0 In ENO 0 In mm.mmormomill 0 MM ommom mom 1101111111111 0 momm ME immommommoilt.00mmo somom Emommomimmom vME mom 0 No ommom In ON 290 28 2'7 -926 �25 �24 23 r922 �21 -920 919 -918 -917 h916 -915 -914 -913 -912 911 -910 -909 -908 -907 906 �05 904 903 02 01 00 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 -389 88 87 86 85 �84 -883 -882 -881 $80 _r-._..T--TTTTTT i 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 T.. _-11 , -T f _, F n O O O O O O O O O 0 OI 0 Ln O Ln O Ln 0 � O Ln O Ln O + + + + + + + + + + + O d Ln � c0 c0 r- r� 00 00 01 Cn O+ 0+00.00 1+73.96 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 9 92 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 9 990 90 90 90 90 MEN MI MEEMEN III I 0 11EMN ME ME ro ME M ME In N 00 O0 00 On 00 + + + + + + CD O O 1 1 N I 3 SANITARY SEWER PROFILE C20 1 =40 30 9 S 7 6 25 4 3 2 20 i9 8 7 15 4 3 2 1 10 9 8 6 05 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS — - - - - - - — PROPERTY LINE - - SAWCUT LINE - - - - - - - - - - - (APPROX.) SANITARY SEWER 30 3 WATER PIPE DRAIN TILE ---�--- STORM SEWER 3� RETAINING WALL FIRE HYDRANT GATE VALVE N CLEANOUT • CATCH BASIN ■ REDUCER 0 MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION WITH RIPRAP SEWER INVERT ELEVATION 1 ABBREVIATIONS L G Building BM Bench Mark CB Catch Basin CONC Concrete DIP Ductile Iron Pipe ELEV Elevation EX Existing FFE Finished Floor Elevation INV Invert MAX Maximum MH Manhole MIN Minimum PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe RED Reducer RD Roof Drain 40' 20' 0 40' 80' SCALE 1° = 407 W z W Iz W P� COD Cn G O L0 Q w a Q Z Z 0 r,N �Lu Lu n �0+m0 04 Z �iy 0 0 CF w N CP a a s 0 C � � N �ww N� 00 w 0 01 0, 2 O 04 �t Ln m LL LL 0 0 Illlllllgll W >)m0 cM g I ( 0,vin Lo0ar x �Zaoo 0 00 Z i� a W m W W 4(5 m N Co a) .9 w z �Z [J C9 o n ro a. -(Do- Lu N g ¢ w C W N No an P E aq m' J 5 .Oc Coawm € f �0 � Z w Q0 n w a� C m �ZwOZ� U z w Z i_ 0 m LL Z Z H v -� w= W ww N:E — W O Y V I W �J 11 J w TW O i ~u Z z 00 0 w Z �Q � �z = v SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILES PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM C201 PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS W! 0+00.00 0+69.48 91'�` 9 9 9 91 9 9 9 90 9 9 9 9 90 8 8 89 8 8 B 8 89 0-611011113 �: 00. w S. ONE n Wks INIMMEMMUSME IMEMEMEMENROM NMI IMMEMINVAN INN JIM ME 11111111111 NMI on mom �C r Cr) 0 0 1 1 5 A C C E C Ulnnn W AI I _ 1 STORM SEWER PLAN VIEW ll 20 1 =40 n�F�n 1-Lnn 11rn 0�nn 0�rn Zinn 4+66.67 n Aron niFn 5+00 5+ ZO - -- 91 ORZON AL SCALE 1"— 0' if 91 -lil IGN - 4. 5.-- ---- -. _. - 917 1i I 91 ..__ _---- -- -- ----- - ' _..- _. 91 II 91 SPR 91 it 11 1 90 01 90 -- --- - -. __ .-..--..-._.._ ._.-.......- - --- - ------ - ... 901 907 0 90 - - -- - - - - - - 01 0 C 90 --..--- - ------ 1 6 90 0, corn * - - - 0 90 zz 0, 0 I I j i C 89 4 5' OF 2" RCF ® 2.4 I 1 398,i 97 397 9'. 39 9f 9 I I I c 39 -- --- I 9 39 39 9, 89 91 9 C 0 0 0 Ln 0 S N 0 0 0 + + + + 0 + + + 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + + + + + N N r7 r7 0 0 0 Cn � 0 It) 5 0 I r 0 0+00.00 1+47.83 92 9 9 9 9 92 9 91 9 91 91 91 91 91 9 9 9 9 90 9 9 90 NMI IMMINIMMEMloommommommom EMEN "4100111 IN HE Em MINE11150-1111111 ill 9,1110011 IN HIMMIN MEMO SEEN M Nam' o 0 o 0 h + 0 0+ 0+ + + + I 4 3 2 1 20 9 a 7 6 15 4 3 2 1 90 8 7 6 05 3 2 1 00 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - - - - - - - - PROPERTY LINE — - - SAWCUT LINE - - - - - - - - - - - (APPROX.) SANITARY SEWER — WATER PIPE —I I DRAIN TILE ---�--- STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL FIRE HYDRANT GATE VALVE N CLEANOUT • CATCH BASIN ■ REDUCER 0 MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION WITH RIPRAP SEWER INVERT ELEVATION IDS SU�� ABBREVIATIONS BLDG Building BM Bench Mark CB Catch Basin CONC Concrete DIP Ductile Iron Pipe ELEV Elevation EX Existing FIFE Finished Floor Elevation INV Invert MAX Maximum MH Manhole MIN Minimum PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe RED Reducer RD Roof Drain 40' 20' 0 40' 80' SCALE 17y = 407 U z M Lot 'o U 0 Q w O Q 0 Z g� r` N LU N o Z��8 M 0Z !Ead 0 01 U Z l9 N ��10 0' �� Lu '3 0�0� z 0,04 0` to n w OU 00 CV ' 2 °0' N O Cv�o=X -41' N m a o n � � o I'II��IIII M N M Lo N ' - I r C $ $ /�� C 0 M Z W W m co co w W �Z �'oc^o��s z o��^i .eE �W codlm Z 0 a 0 N V w O U w w SQ N 0 w P4 Q co W w V I F- � W -T� L LJ � O y Z z Z 0 00 Q Lu v//��' L / CD Z = V STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM C202 0+00.00 0+39.55 1+57.99 2+31.29 93 t�5 0+00 1 10+,50, ,1+,00, 1+,5Q .2+00 .2+.50. 3+003 92 92 927 92 92 92 92 97_ 92 92 91 9, 917 1 91 91 91 91 91 91 909 90 907 90 90 904 90 902 90 90 89 89 897 89 89 894- 893- 89 89 89 NMI No m ommoomm Moll MIIIII NONE IN ommoomm Boom IN MINN 0 IN M INEMINIUMNIII, M milli mimmmumm M mol I M 1 MEN mill WOVA 1IMMME INN on mmomommomom MU 0 mm 0 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 922 21 20 19 18 �917 16 9145 13 12 I'911 910 09 08 ,907 906 105 04 03 02 Oi 00 399 398 397 196 !! 9 5 94 93 92 91 9 N O O O O O O O + O + + + + + + + I O O N N rM 1 c q n. 9 •• oo • • •• 1 STORM SEWER PLAN VIEW 20 1 =40 0+98.29 3+42.58 ME 1190 MEN ME mmomm MEN OMNI NMI NIIINI mom No a MEN Is MEN I ME 1 IN owli 11 IN N IN NEL Bill ME M M i oil in II ME oil mom IN M ON loom M mom 10 NMI 0 IN IN MEMO M 0 no ME 9 4 3 2 1 30 9 a 7 6 25 4 3 2 1 20 9 a 6 15 4 3 2 10 9 7 6 05 4 3 2 1 90 8 7 6 5 0+00.00 0+66.06 1+23.05 9s 9 9 9 9s 9 9 92 9 9 9 92 9' 9 9 91 9 9 9 9 91 9 9 9 9 90 - gin■ ommmmmlimmomi rm NMI NOON No NONE 0 MENEM �1 MI IN MEMO OMNI MEN IMMI No "No No INEM r.IJ1 I MEMO ME M 45 3 2 1 30 9 6 25 4 _3 2 1 20 9 8 7 6 15 4 3 2 1 90 8 7 p6 5 (�! O O O O O O O O CD O O O u7 + O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O O Ln O L0 r p + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 O O - N N M r7 c} O+ O O - I PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - - - - - - - - PROPERTY LINE — - - — SAWCUT LINE - - - - - - - - - - - (APPROX.) SANITARY SEWER—� WATER PIPE DRAIN TILE ---�--- STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL 000�ooc�oo FIRE HYDRANT -� GATE VALVE N CLEANOUT • CATCH BASIN No REDUCER 0 MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION WITH RIPRAP SEWER INVERT ELEVATION . 915.50 ABBREVIATIONS BLDG Building BM Bench Mark CB Catch Basin CONC Concrete DIP Ductile Iron Pipe ELEV Elevation EX Existing FFE Finished Floor Elevation INV Invert MAX Maximum MH Manhole MIN Minimum PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe RED Reducer RD Roof Drain Q, 40' 20' 0 40' 80' SCALE 1" = 407 PAI r, in M N Q L G OO r- Q _ w w O a 0Q� N Q Z r,Lo ce (10 �qqm0 04w v =ne O 0 6 C ? (D10 N 0,� w Z C` 0, 0 w C w O P 0 04 't N on = a X o I�IIIIIp�II I o m �� a s 0 ,n n LO N r $ I 3Zaoz 02coC o a w m W Lu co _ .2 z �2 n co0 8 a z w 0 MZ W aN 2 ?°�o c 6 LL.Lm ' ta.€ U © a R. w 0 00 d 0 H p inQ ZUZZ W Fd OD 0 o f ,p< w V wZ -� 0�z wG0 of � Tw wO v Y , ^^ V J — ICn LLJ W Q T W cef 0 y (n W z z \z 0 w Z (/) Lo _ 0 =v STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM C203 PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS W! 1 STORM SEWER PLAN VIEW 20 1 =40 0+00.00 1 +06.54 1 +61.81 92 t59 , 0+,00, 0+,50 ,1+Op, , , ,1+50„ , , 2+,00, 2+, 1 91 91 917 91 91 914 91. 91 91 91 90 90 90 90 90 90 90" 901- 90 w ME ONE mm IS IS IS 1 omm 14 MIN No OHIO 0 millim E MEN 111111111101MONINEM mmimmm IS ENIMEN ONIMON E. 0 •919 -918 -917 9i6 -915 -914 -913 L912 11 0 -909 08 07 O6 05 04 03 02 01 00 I �T 1 I 1 - i - 1 - !- —f L0 CDCDOil O L0 Oz V) Ln O N O + + +>> + 1 O O -zz N N 0+00.00 0+51.65 1+06.80 92� �n n.4-nn n��n 1 nn 9 9 9 9 91 91 9 9 9 91 9 9 9 9 90 9 9 9 90 SIMON ME IS ENO I lim PROFILE ■ ME I MEMO Nil .4-1011 IS .a I mom 11 1 Ln Oo b3 o O + + L_ + + O O O 0 9 8 7 15 4 3 2 1 10 9 8 7 6 05 3 2 00 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - - - - - - - - PROPERTY LINE - - SAWCUT LINE - - - - - - - - - - - (APPROX.) SANITARY SEWER 30 30- WATER PIPE I I DRAIN TILE ---a--- STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL FIRE HYDRANT GATE VALVE N CLEANOUT • CATCH BASIN ■ REDUCER 0 MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION WITH RIPRAP 41110 SEWER INVERT ELEVATION bl ABBREVIATIONS BLDG Building BM Bench Mark CB Catch Basin CONC Concrete DIP Ductile Iran Pipe ELEV Elevation EX Existing FFE Finished Floor Elevation INV Invert MAX Maximum MH Manhole MIN Minimum PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe RED Reducer RD Roof Drain 40' 20' 0 40' 80' SCALE 17) = 407 C (M N G � 2!w w 0 c d g0 Z w N o Oq M p 0 v 04Z �ui O 01 O Z Q N N r .p 01 0 a 04a' Lu ov$i �a 04 O 04 w ? 0 rn a Q 04 dt N = ca a-LL X o m IIII�IIII to II > t Cc0 .o III NN 'If �u)0, Nr 8 y ;zCoZ oicocl_ s W m LU m y 00 U g z zliew Z 0^ M O p CL �` F =E w 2 a) ci— O C 0 s �W 9m 13 pia LL a ff i£ mo� o� < z0N u� N LL w d w �o== 0 ' 2J w00 aow<zb wgo Z)� UgZwz mU�Q�Z =va OYZO 4`. wl� r n � w LLI Q T L LI 0 y (n w Z z � Z_ 0 w Z (1) r n Q ,Ln 10 Z = V STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM C204 ABBREVIATIONS KEYED NOTES PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS N ' BLDG Building BM Bench Mark WEARING COURSE TACK COAT PER MN/DOT 2357. KEYED NOTES ARE DENOTED BY No ON PLAN. U�i CONC Concrete PER MN/DOT 2360 1 INSTALL 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. REFER TO DETAIL 7/C401. z CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - - ELEV Elevation SPWEA240 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE (10% ❑ 1_ EX Existing o CRUSHED PER MN ❑2 INSTALL MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. REFER TO r/j NON -WEARING COURSE ), MN/DOT 3138 DETAILS 7 C401 AND 8 C300. (~ PROPERTY LINE - - FIFE Finished Floor Elevation COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% / / 0 U LIFE MN/DOT 236 E Lower Floor Elevation SPNWB230 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. ❑ INSTALL NOSEDOWN CURB SECTION. REFER TO DETAIL 7/C300. W RETAINING WALL oo�000000 MAX Maximum 1 5' N MIN Minimum p 1.5" ® INSTALL HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. REFER TO DETAIL 6/C300. HEAVY DUTY R Radius BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Typical 14 MNM ;•, 6" MIN. ❑ INSTALL LIGHT -DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. REFER TO DETAIL 5/C300. FOR LINK ON 86TH Traffic Control Devises CONCRETE MNMUTCD Minnesota Manual Uniform STREET MATCH EXISTING CROSS SECTION. o c PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK 12" MIN. © INSTALL CURB CUT FOR DRAINAGE SWALE. REFER TO DETAIL 4/C300. 4" DRAIN TILE �1/� W COURT SURFACE ':::o:o:: RESILIENT SPORT LOWPONTS LACED AT ❑ CONCRETEINSTALL ONCRETE WALK. FINIS AND JOINTING. TO DETAIL 8/C401. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR 40' 20� 0 •+V� 80' z PAVING NOTES: ,� AND AT CATCH Flu -II-II-� -� I 12" MIN. INSTALL NEW CURB AND GUTTER TO MATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER ALONG CSAH NO. 101.i �/�,..>BASINS -II-IIIII-III-III-II- FOLLOW ALL CITY AND COUNTY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SCALE 1� �FV�FLAT CURB AND GUTTER •1. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR STOOP DETAILS. ALL WALKS ARE TO BE CENTERED ON THE 14 �® - - - - - W DOORS. \ �:. \, ' (1 ❑9 INSTALL CONCRETE DRIVE ENTRANCE. REFER TO DETAIL 9/C300. Q PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP � 2. INSTALL APPROPRIATE EXPANSION MATERIAL WHERE CONCRETE IS ADJACENT TO BUILDING FACE. / �"' � SELECT GRANULAR SUBBASE, ♦ Q.:::,:.�� GENERAL NOTES: ACCESSIBLE PARKING 3 TRANSITIONS OR SAWCUT AND CH NEG BITUMINOUS PAVELL S NT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT. NO ABRUPT GRADE / \ ` '.`�1 SUBGRADESCARIFY TO 0 AT LEAST COMPACPER TDEDTT01AgMN�MUM OF t0 INSTALL MONUMENT SIGN. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS (�xl SYMBOL ( / 100% STANDARD PROCTOR 100% STANDARD PROCTOR 11 INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO DETAIL 2-6/C401. REFER TO MN/DOT STANDARD NOTED OTHERWISE. a 4. MATCH NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER INTO EXISTING. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF CHANHASSEN �' DENSITY -PROOF ROLL PER MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. PLAN 5-297.250 AND MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7038. STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CURB TYPE, MATERIAL AND INSTALLATION METHODS. ♦ �'''��'`� pp �,.•,:. 2. ALL CURB AND GUTTER IS TO BE 8612 CONCRETE SIGN ql 5. SAWCUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER TO NEAREST JOINT. I \ MN/DOT 2111 ❑ CURB AND GUTTER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. V uu \ '� 12 INSTALL STOP SIGN PER MNMUTCD R1-1. Z COORDINATE REMOVAL LIMITS WITH SITE DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR AND CONSTRUCTION MAN R. \ �'' ';� 3. NO SIDEWALK IS TO HAVE MORE THAN A 2% CROSS INSTALL DRIVE ENTRANCE PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. LLOW PARKING STALL COUNT Q ALL CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND CARVER COUNTY REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC CONTRO \ ��'.. * 5 LIGHT -DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 13 INSTALL BITUMINUOUS WALK. REFER TO DETAIL 3/C300. SLOPE OR MORE THAN A 5% LONGITUDINAL SLOPE. pQ Ln CJ 17 NOT TO SCALE 14 INSTALL 4-INCH WIDE PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING LINE, WHITE IN COLOR. 4. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PROPOSED 0 Ln 17 / t... ._.� 3OO ❑ BUILDING LAYOUT. QLU = 14 �.....1` 15 POURED RESILIENT SPORT COURT SURFACE. 5. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND CARVER a 0 *NOTE: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE ANTICIPATED // p V. COUNTY RULES, REGULATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS 0 w Q TO BE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE / 16 INSTALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT. REFER TO DETAIL 8/C300. WHEN WORKING IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. Q Z o w SHOWN. I WEARING COURSE TACK COAT PER MN/DOT 2357. 6. NO PONDING OF WATER OR ABRUPT TRANSITIONS WILL N c m O / PER MN/DOT 2360 17 INSTALL MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL. BE ALLOWED WHERE NEW PAVEMENT/CURB/SIDEWALK 0 `0 ,O V uj ,..R20,0' SPWEA240 MATCHES INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT/CURB/SIDEWALK. 'J 0 0, p, Z C7 cn 20 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE (10% 18 INSTALL TRANSFORM PAD. REFER TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIREMENTS. O w / 17 7 11'° NON -WEARING COURSE CRUSHED), PER MN/DOT 3138 7. PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS VARY. REFER TO PLANS.. N O 01 10 PER MN/DOT 2360 COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% 19 INSTALL GENERATOR PAD. REFER TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIREMENTS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ACCESSIBLE PARKING AISLE w 04 Z 01 cn 0 a R20.0' SPNWB230 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.04 STRM #17 11 WITH STANDARD STRIPING AND "NO PARKING" AS w LnLn V N / 5 7 1.5" 20 INSTALL STREET NAME SIGN. FOLLOW CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS. SHOWN ON PLANS. p 0 0 O / 2 7 12 2 21 INSTALL NO PARKING FIRE LANE SIGN AND PAINT CURB YELLOW. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION v N m d LL ♦ 7 •° • • • ° . ° ° 6 MIN. WITH FIRE MARSHAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. r� 5: R540 300'-' 22 INSTALL ADA PARKING SIGN PER DETAILS 7/C402 AND 8/C402. 20 / C ♦ � p 7 10 \ 4" DRAIN TILE 12" MIN. ♦ )'J?J ❑ PLACED AT 5.0' :' N12 p LOWPOINTS -III III III- 5 R3.0' \ AND AT CATCH - _ 7 •P R72;D' 24 0 \ BASINS III III -III -III -III -III -III- 12' MIN. n�\• 5 ❑ \ SELECT GRANULAR SUBBASE, O / / 2 240 ,.J\ • 5.9 SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT PER MN/DOT 3149.2B2 y. O 18.0' p 7 SUBGRADE TO AT LEAST COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF BROOM FINISH 'IfIIIII o_ 5 5 100% STANDARD PROCTOR 100% STANDARD PROCTOR u1 0 5.0' �' -' DENSITY -PROOF ROLL PER MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. CONCRETE SLAB III III ai O M� O O 9 0 �`' 2 MN/DOT 2111 Lo Lo o O O 75.9 6 W HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT al �MI m co O / 7 wnrEF 300 NOT TO SCALE °� roe W W W o cc 0 4B 2 0 '' ° _ /\ 8 / 7CL 00°oo8 oa0 ° °oaf ° io c7 � � W Qi m .• E 1 °°o°ooe aOo° z Z O C 0 M V 0°8° o a r 1 `' / • �4 .0' Z o°8Oo°�o 0 0°° W tL N C O R54,q' c0 d <L m D a wg' / 5 7 / 2 ' R8 0` 20 { 3Q 0 • \ \ \\i\�/i��//�//��/i\\, c� P 1 FULL CURB HEIGHT GRANULAR BASE / - REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS rA RS 0•6 05.5' TOP OF CONCRETE CURB COMPACTED SUBGRADE G �0 REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS Q 0 r- / R760 '55 L°J 0, 1 Own 10 1 3' TAPER SECTION IN GRASS; 2 CONCRETE SLAB z a o _ R4.0' ^ . 4 , 10 FEET WITH ADJACENT WALK; 3OO NOT TO SCALE 5 o 31 iy R6 0' 7 26.0 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE d 3 n o 1 21 R6.0' S• R388.5' W 6'rtT(; R 26. T J 26.0'OwQ w m 8 z o o / 20. R4.0' w Z R2.0' R10.0' R 0.5.0 © R4.0' -.a z m D w z o a w O o Q O 4� - Q w Z - / 6.0' 18. R6.0' CONCRETE GUTTER z R16 tl ❑ R392 0 5 7 R20.0' CL V - 0 w • 1 �h w w OIw- N W O Y p t `4" Fir e / 5.0' t �: 28 0 .': ❑5 1 y� � •p R4.0' R36.0' I / •,.'e-R16.0' 1 V' R6.0' R4.0' 6 9.0 R46.0 26.0' 1 Q 9.0 ElR10 0 1R6.0' R4.0' R4.0' R4.0' R43.7',. ❑ f 1 R6.0' R4.0' 9.5' 4. Ell R14 0, t „� °'Gs1 3 .0 1 .o' .5 to t 300 NOT TO SCALE .....�° d I NOSE -DOWN CURB SECTION 5 1 U n .- - o P L� l Lu n/ tstra r1AL .. R ,.', P4 BPVV VW 4' 4 P V4 VV 4 Ov / 26_�24. D' V22 vV 9PPP 9P { VG CV 9VP 4 . O O V pj,°vl-°�ln••• Pavavpvop4Pp9.p4 • v.4• p,15yPvopv t3 BROOM FINISH "L"L`.b VVVPVVPV4VVPVVVVCV 4YV' VVV V4VIIPV . ••.V VPII4P p4pVP4V9VP4V VP{ PpV 99PVPP°9P ' (� 94V9049a V949O P94 P9994P4+ Op VV y ^` N1' g." Ct*' Cwi, R8 m w •1 V PYV9VP4II4PCPV 9P°tl 44 P4 OOP • � M�4qq,,ry� ����� # u W •' V°V4PVVPPP44PVaVpP4 yyV+y �90• '•� 1 36. ', Pv4P 49p4PVP v9� v° •� CONCRETE PAVING WITH � 1 PPv V4 C 4p4 4P449O4 s 15 r R118.0' ,n R36 ° vv pPPvv`vv°ov •`- CONTROL JOINTS AT 10' �U:6t'FN(4 `" r` p R4.0' �/ 11 'va16° 44 v994epv cvP... P v 49 O4PPPv4°p4Pp MAXIMUM SPACING flF1r "' O 8 1t• 3 P �cv Pv°4vy9 vv+° _ 1 26.0' ❑ .0' 22 22 22 P444 ° ° < R980 7 65 R110.0' a' n 7 ° 7 1 0 8" CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER 1 SrOoLD15iS TC OC 3ACKnULq) ANIC ` S' 0 01H rOPW ANDw Rf..MtaTf."t<?P 5'Ri . GfW `:°FR / B.fi O / SPECIFICATIONS. in 11 BCC P,00R & OA 0m t tR 91AU SV"Pt-Y A � Y':Alt '00M MN r v / 6.0' 5" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 100% Ios PLIAL `,'� t*,t:A lw1 RL lw At#°*jvk �#:�Ai4a51aN, xttt8f'K;'4►.u".. t.N.°..9'.A1 R17.0' 35.8' '' R2 .6 r�� �/ ( VA.* 0i W:%7 a{(�.iA CkC1Ale�tx,: ON (:iC*JiH�;�'.-tt�+ISDC °#k_ 4:7NL*7 1"a. U; • R116.0' ^� CRUSHED) PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATION - PROPOSED BUILDING ������������������������ 3138, COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% " B�RPk'1FH M.°S MA'i NOT Of C f6G Lill JCf 'i.E sots• No ryas / R23. R18.0' �w ' STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. FFE 924.50 7 %7� MAC F 0 b' C cA �atSHAL arias L1 VVIE RJZ.4'\/����j/��\���\, sa�rtac s&xaSrIG tlFIts 3rrw11 ze rsta feE aarc ro ess r aro 4' i COMPACTED SUBGRADE. / LFE 919.50 R11.0' .. � Rt3.0' R13AR3 0 •, � [gyp R13.0' R18.0'iTiiailvu�s R18.0' ' NOTE: JOINT SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED R13.0' 24 70 30 TIMES THE PAVEMENT THICKNESS 5.0 7 3. mawf 11.0' R20.0' R1 WITH A MAXIMUM OF 15 FEET. I AIL ` 16 r 1.R131. 5.0' tt(FI t ii4[' i Ef P.v`%#Et"l.n 5.0' 5.0''rLLmM4�w�'w�tc^. , 8 CONCRETE PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE ®` 300 / R13.0' 6 0 R13' ;', 16 / R10.5' Rsos�o, R18.0' 3 BITUMINOUS PATH R204.9 300 NOT TO SCALE I 1 42.9 ® 1 R5.5' 8 0 13 R199.1' 19 R22 0 8.0' .. \„ ; , t .,� .n 1. •, ° n :. l ` .n �,� n n 17 4.0 R2 79' , R56. _ X t_f jC 7 4< !% T iC jr$ • 1 � I ti../� } C�.� ����� 1 R23.0`' ae(i 4. CE`tA3<ki » -••- r �° i (� t' '<�` ., 5.0' R5.0' OAK % // S E NOTES 1 ' r'-". t. W ww pig' • '. W '» r r� W e i I R2.0 1 o IN R30.0' V I �LJ C C,_ j tC X < C_X J W I< � 13 � eT' ¢ " coo, rte pzWrmrt �` / `i � `n / J i /� t i� .:. d Ti ° 1 J ,L it W Ran i4tt - 0 11 rvn1: fi' :i ffiX. RRb ksCit�@4'e4tk Pe�t ILLJ ••:+,. R44.0 #0 gD ' , , ti' :r...•r... '" .�' •� ;• •y'• N •h ''{ { 1J >' - N: r.'* Ko "$kwl," a :i • d' .�,. y, 6.0' CONCRETE GUTTER z � ` fdd,, 4ne4etFiaks�Ca�straas:1 00 PLAN VIEW Z 11 ctILLJ - T.1:418 Cirb & dStxtTMx'- Tj (•+- $f18 Csar6 6t 6.jrt Q B,:.A ri;6to4 w 6vw CONCRETE CURB r Q e1:um, s w (D _ o I z .m. 2,-0„ 2' 0" _ '10i0ty /. "r"!t, .� .�•. •e,.r•. f. �' :+»S y .i = U cz CA WOOD WALL 1+ai9tp ••.',ia9t t $, 7 E'san4ton.d4hr! (1)y'.v•-� O L 4%w j4 ('A) sbrh ra.+nf•arromomt in r&w pa.*d a� 0" porn ed4a 2'-0" " .�, r, a' u 1 ter_ 1/1 6" c. ftl 01 " tg,cb ,t# _ PAVING AND �. Gc�ntrurtinr, �i1o%Sc e^rrx:p t� 9J:$ r,x crprh n€ har crank, CONCRETE GUTTER netrc�t� to the rq t of aqY sr,u +ez+sat FRONT VIEW GEOMETRIC TRU/1 /K H/GHW,4 Y /VO. 212 4. -;t,ir pov "', 0 4401rtti w #NI ' of tr* vt,"t If 4 °. r`+prp'M9dt* us" In too MN 0101 to Cron to NOTE: � • rf n°f, for ecf, 4a* -n* 4"wwgy paowroit a cs a±uwcturPea tay 1. THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS PLAN �NUt,,+y ntt'at 14MIA arr+n w0h n ?#" g*rn'm 4° « k 1,tv*= t ontof tk tsm ra4teo-1.. CLASS 1 RIPRAP OPTION, MAY SUBSTITUTE A i cONICR :TE £7RtA A" AFiON ,t v?;`• j r{ -tip: ra. -1 L'<'=aE;'-° _ �� GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BLANKET, Mn/DOT SPEC. 3601, FOR THE GRANULAR FILTER FILTER BLANKET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. 2.RIP-RAP SHALL BE PLACED PROJECT NO: 2000.01 1 PAVING AND GEOMETRIC PLAN rc:c kC,..'::r �_ }a SEE NOTE2 1 AND 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH DRAWN BY: NPA 30 -40 RIPRAP VIEW Mn/DOT SPEC. 2511. CHECKED BY: KAM 9 CONCRETE DRIVE ENTRANCE 300 NOT TO SCALE 4 CURB OPENING FOR DRAINAGE SWALE C300 300 NOT TO SCALE wl RZIAW 6.25 21.50 bkbm firetruck feet Width : 8.50 Track : 8.50 Lock to Lock Time : 6.0 Steering Angle : 45.7 TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 212 40' 20' 0 'Cl 80' SCALE 1" = 407 v z r, p m V Q L v O Lrn FLLJ — _ w w r� O Oa-Lu Q Q r N LLJ N 04 M 0 0 z w 2N O � P o ° Z �w N 0, a w z_ �,' 0\ Oa '3 Cl Ln d4 In V In 00 w O 0, 0� O 04Do=X �U-)ma� m p p � 0�N �Nw= a O, d N�25 0 ~ �OVZ Z n C Q w � 0 Q D V Q Z � w T V :D w Z w rt Z Z w w w 0 =v�f w_ 0 -ti H- w —J w Q Z 11J af nw 0 z z � 0 z_ 0 0 ow CIS Q L o = �z = V TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT PLAN PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM C301 V z 5 Ff: td1N. k.F4F,;-oa '.z:9E£'h. PO';T 5 FT, . W4 '4 S M POSTF _ A# t H f. Mrwe. SAC. AT 6 11 "A rF4ia+4 -.-, LSTET`tR,F ='A6r+tC1 ' '4#+c;RE,C Ytexta 1s* ttg { > Pl+kStf 21P a� .` s € Nr ,I Ae _ a CJ' t�l D`_ , F : l�,Vv*,,a C toac xt"AL t t EFs t„ FEF .Eti"i�tiJ tt t QA ¢ 1iflE M(10 tAn Tar W GYAfip79f �E`vd x +4 s -ALL T�FJ'TFc.�� G"^ tR-"kriity4'i J1 1�� �ii}rtl ad wtlminq w� fL�A :"Ysti F ��.�._ r—,t f Ynas ,wi Pkx£sA $i'4 dt Zifit} IW .--�4R[^ ^^ mm •-... _ _"�"-.e'• �yM S 'toes e 14 xit to kc i I k '" Fra: x kAd o-xRsr an aft *vw+ury � it ��—A�„ ..0 �M'i stAA4 n low rr�1 i ♦♦ fit H%'vwANt WiFttx eiAtt ate j -•M C1gTtE ■ __"____ _.... C •A9tit•7iD S101,44 -S 91%]. OR x4Vl -Air" -�w ..._.._ _.. % Y face'TTO Sol I > AN O"xYrtR#SL [ ?rix.T F1 .E. Mr'A04NE SL1«E:.) Sills".,,,_. , arAVv fd�'"'Q st Cs.Ta -`, '1'i 1P " MR 0 rP0 a� kr *I TWO tkSt.u. �ywa wil f.'ii //) a,t art al "ln vol" IfIrtf 4l W1 0 k p i"•-"" Cl FAN 8'� ,;'4*'n R? .... _... ... `1tAwEe Prx 6t i'.4 Gtk8 .`? a,fx tip tiwF 1" ii1 ! /` l'n— «>..r!" W t ikA++r xiij AAAt Mit4{.niFt �+'` , ./ / a _ tAM, .H4ttti*t +4ttt'r wets# Rtctrt•ti.,R; rA"4 :., ,� nett '.:co woosomd,wl ;attita tors rairs's AT 'r r" ktAlE. 9'+ 30r" CE AIL PilR iMts4. .STt:`"_C" f arVtxon..�ro-c sw wed swot d r nt'FA :. ---,, �,+.:' � . 8 fi STAPLES I•' � Atli 1 m .� ti I, � 1 O --- r-'A G miltsf*oo" 4cw e+zt�u c trN, r r' V*lf rrse+m AurTRne+t. sda, `� iw/ "M 1 �d:iY �t i NWiC flWPk O F �,(_y t ✓ ,. - .._... A•trt to FIB. aovol £'nsa4#.} t"x€RQ±roeAfm r r ( i. y Y Ig0o wmxg re.�AeA .... ' afAs gRota AAmr tlP ' r-'.;xoto No ou « bores HTA"T sit: : S ? t, w ,, .+� coo kvX6 -'4 to agwo utt4ri yrart a. AA;} iNntRa I �"�. .. t... .. ....... .,.... ....... .... . -- efoo t+Ae er a,ri •ut 040 I � �' � ax �Ujm to OIL MAW �4 '". s y4 R ' S` 'L,duv ,at,>}r fkoa. 4antkAba, r,Wtt on acdt 4aelt 5E a � «, '' vdt, wslwY W.. sot .sat dot @A C£AtrD1aR,. ocE S'LOK- CPA££ Rj. �;r ; V Aloe ai to2tt$'tuoFn. It "Im 1 At 4Jf2.L4°nC� in "FT CA m ."»..••� .,• _.. z> +, k .+ asF'RrtrRR a rAtu`Ma4ni6h+s 4"tirt, MAT*Ptp Pelt L t+ ar; •" ! l,ri•^ ev.-f,,. asri .+±auto <ri,. ti tei .,Tar tAl'6ER:A:A.ieM + "�"•A°'� 74 * Z `.bA'rr MktaR 4T14 f+wr------i % tl.� cn t Mtip uC;eaolrec-;tls. [aJ d"Airts 'iECftU>i ,t.G3a w b'k't 1i+4a :�14-. I .. k V a rt4M19i;NMHrP + r2rf •Poi rreaaAvr *�,.., .. : LT =ENC' '. PP�tt i£AtFLEC..1 R ygA ;"A6L- 5,_...,,_.. Q to w AkN s"4A:4'tx:'r$ r ",,,. " ^yN Q S d:tALE�+&l ' .• • , ,`^..^,... .... a s:';s rNe+ti 4n trJ ax F£ .tnCE. bto. r.FNf:i r rw'o-t t w 8• "kj^k r'A•tsrAAA tkldr-.-«✓ •m * Cr>'YPYAYt , .. ,' AI'Ps. .rota 5°Ft #k d Q Arn 1 { �' MYi nrrt •, r c, 51 ntAo EX tea r 5bk O w 9 A1TAtMrt - ...«..« _ y, i I"+4 2 - g, t .5 PEFT 18" M94NUV CUT Eck � Y Z � n -Tin W rat -0 Mlr*Av2E RuiCIFF FROM St-E Gq Z t"agi'4iU'A4t �tal Rs _. „^-,...«� 'tom SS, AttAE1tl5A"Ai+e.. t ,,," . :!'" ; €.WE#, X2'i%. Or FEET FEET FT In Gil M O {grVvxti# cn icitb tlin - S" i8'eraz �..9 �JSt'Y #r """.,„, �'^ i+"tt ru.#f ILL. ` m r does "114 4, "--- MiarbRfi 0 ai -r"on i• 5t,T FEAC£ PU' wlsZOT 5K�: 54V "O ,p V t- � •,• .,«.. k. "R. 6"Mir'.. &ems 9 'tt" C1.i.s A?X.N "`.• Wool AC04PTIN e' +tor 9; loop a woo, Aar 0,,,,tn"t W vlk-S, tare * S50C w - FI„,TER F.ABR.r, � Z '0 ,O 2 LCCATI OF SLY F�tdR:� 01 Z (n eN6 . kAyw, rJ' kt"xK'rte` 1,171i Grt3rpm Otto, t' M k'!`#nlmis hr 01Wv f i1 swN otS Tv 6 vtae# Neva 1'.am Vol Taos R 0 O i 1 ` ( w R !Bf? rF1r+tlaxQ. ;+ t'k..t yWuRir t*.t• ta'. tor} k.xa mw ca,"A%rt'P¢ Ai0% 1 A" N i� 0` 0�. � i� � I° C TI()l owns: tcttt �tt�t�li ttlltt w O z� o� w "I #,"ANT* Ste 1 nAfi > WAM C� n O d Ln .X Ntr 'Re tC01''&t .' �#A� cT to*Tt s S ' A4't-r Pr' cY.:1 ' LIT F U} 4.� , o t- p0 0, 01 Q `n d; 4;rxx'? % AF;^T11N tm rb'rNI *Ar'w' AW 6a`.^w'kC;.Troa?, 54.T eETw:E 4t7E:. „�,.�,,,._.. `).:)'T� ri 7(7� Agn`?t" 50IA t ar '}.mr i owf7p ftlT.r:.GPI V) co S X w 4. t,tr•,40ot %4tTA �A'994 rAuka f4."dx�fr+" A Nt 104T VARPO 1:: Cm-n.,.arrA eNnrtewie OY aTwR .. >aaertr-Are nli^?il,Tir. kWi. Ol at to [!] a 5 ALL .Cwit$ S44" iE 4FS P . e A& VEZA-Lima of ,n W AEb1AAN', ;' !# ,tutor :"gtoi kn fl .a xuitmi mr x&j.. 4 w.t.,d«, "'rNo'n W,1 k '�TtaP nALaEs r,RCF'tA7+C4�1 Tt114t3UGM �K.. <. 'Lo% .a ke otnit+JF9 orr4Mt :sees lc t:t jt-. #",x1zk ¢ewH mS*aNOk9e: v "i ... .-. ._.. ... ,., :astF�- to sa to*atr A`YC Daat' Ito-aiceein curt .c:zkr e. A;,L mfoill of t, A "ttxi6 1Ti trt+lxtA,: AX}9. : AL+. 'ix 8tE i'"2" A. tr,r, ssa ssr-ewte xnsr'nA+t ,A a s++tsrn ;ne • f - Ar rat? toll` r,4"CklT &nxNAd rz~s4wto I oMWA p�t no 4t J T-go to r ,�. No t9C�t nRtac±9'ES �r4 aWamet, I. A. 7 P7 f)L ft MtN PtAS'kC 'AFtAP dA 8&: *"L'+ Aaialrr xuf.h to in mM.tRr8w 1.t'x`.•A'ih;�l Jf SJs.T f%FAEE ff@suiil R1A" T 5 00 Of MINIX 4 wwwro4 m 4- e" ,a M1Nr: tot," k R+axww too, "o 1 ar{ 1, vty. rum, a•w•xrgtA 1n, 1 t'* ,Ra Y,pAM t -a a vtst i+i dt' Ftr k<tTf�k o^'ll'it STORM SEWER? CA710- BASIN YPICAL Y TANDAR ROCK Y '< :1' RP::`7ANCAP AR-~L)P'ANI (Iffif SANITARY attlV[ SILT i1i11�1 CONSTRUCTION 4tnvcr us eA Alt IN !PS�I IAL—�A 11(3t, r4APdH E '� Fill ENTRANCE LNGALL1>'N ELr�F WLNI J,ol nt,Axt Nq, t° ity;T': c F'e&'r1FuEi'14V'.tu="4f; TtiE'h+"x I4 mglt6EO D.. q! w,xit NC.. !MISER 1...3Q MiIITC Nan 0 $� wAr r ==N •`.trs s f 'Ai.BSiFEirivte f)EF)ARTstEte;T ttEwsm: a-T2 PLATE Ftt.s c :� i P•! ENGiNEh�iiNG EAi�C�AENT.�3Liil Far NMa1: to ENt�NEERING 17�'ARTh1ENT 5301 0 FXE N,tA4Fi Gk Fg O Q I�IIIIII��II 05 o N 00 Co �5 g- CO N I o 13 CB-2' X 3' 10 HYDRANT INSTALLATION 7 STANDARD SANITARY MANHOLE 1 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (� °to It I LO 40 NOT TO SCALE 40 NOT TO SCALE 4 0 NOT TO SCALE 4 0 M z O N 4 SILT FENCE NOT TO SCALE I y 13 z � � Z $� 40 NOT TO SCALE tx C W m t W o z �ZN 0 C9 w� �s 1.eE O C 0 .. > - a mw �cLc�mm �o ,.w. SEDIMENT q[`,t[ }�pT �j �1 to � rL tor_ m c e i /4 a .ice Ifs tiCJ 114N1 41Y t�i VJ Q t go 3 8 i YAT?tAptt,Ee a amR+i t0( j�c? �.� ` ��+' r. T f � � .,�' tAerJUFt1GTJ�R± E?'° WIhN;t3.!L�.5k1A14F7f'E�. bAt^;I.• ,r1 / r F'rt�Srca• Qe rsilpF ✓ l: / ESS EROSl. CORCCIRAggl, Mth, 0R FOUTA. i m o r$ naurt1RQ. rf "�i `/:'°:r3rit f+�" 7A�at1 Nt€ O Or, '/ wa. A. rc At axrrnoto0o w 409 pro- Z O NCl'JW t K-ASA'w E�iTk R"tQ .``, e .. � w oirtgtrm [. t rAr t m a T arf4 z rt. «n x _ � v o',..r« Soto Funs +. g o O Oz 1F[r4i TEE P'.7$?5 Etas. ~` '-ss=,-.-,.- i. v-. ,".«„ T':'i:A MVr&T tote .S' A t ... ,^. s r. *''" „' :y :m i•.: - s+u« ,a:a non. 1 aR sir. w oaoA1 air aoa • a^ sFxx N ton w V1s11A a ¢ �' e H Oa V :8wt r<it6 to 45'Atetti fe�.,et i''tttt th!Attf Pti A` PAW'ITf3 's l ` wry„ aroeeaerec = w w w."'•='",A ..y>«. ,,.+.'•'".: .. +#rnnRktr� krc•x. i Pi G r top 6" Fxtir,L4ett bkae, rt$r,as d r t J m r:i, , Yi::. J bC 4 C O �s-^--•- ^max atatF - _. n T R 4it' MN Y 2 43 :2M +� -� �� C#t ` 0 � ✓ %tgarl pi with T t 4" P_!E^ Fka .'i fro, 1: M dd f 7 i ..t! l r TJ j, t}FRtrm tRo 9 iz7 U Z Q '` ,. _..-... StatSetfi.Fke.. aani 51a hw:1M.#'X' # .. , r NtR'Wri UFt TEt. TR.,tSTS*--..,..,. R �..12Qf6 Z'grover. m � �Q +w Z gg ` pu.vs tot tk ,A ti fir . :: Tito tY3mst it 14 �.," ,� R-AS-L'fu�x �,P$.` �t r � O y �� c��,k,»..»»_, oasts u rt trcn a _ . C1_- a" fWC mat r1 1 M4N,tr rE tfA" Pik Tr3?x :t • 1 .' .T'd 6% s�w�T 5E'r1u1N ,. -.. . .. _ ttod4 ' 1 — .. .. µ �v PiiXTwr ?- W or Cold, t Y _ w O Y o 1 LNarnel f �y ;.W,"... .. Notartil (k,-4.tttt'1, a s k .•,., �„s PIE-t`.i'Tt cf0ioc o8 pot de s 4.. , F t„ TyCp wk`" C a" -�,. :t �111tl000pi edt 5t i the D a arx ge'• iar be w o . wet,,Y _co"A e 't #d:>: w E 1Lfc tars, s :n jr ♦ • e* SAHr }v$4f t"t Nf 1#5t?' s iCE: CiptNYFtkieM' "` a 8 ,.lL. �r""i�'A°t• ,:€SA h'6 'ts.-4 .,. C$:. .. '""y� ro ""° 4 M +tY"t C%gl" totted not'tro fill froorkIt °.ddTti 4 ttt#s, In 12E .Te CFt 4 4'.' Y:? C)CT 3'4R, it771 "' "" �'�,,,. r •«,t b POtN T Est r s' „fir ':4r Me Tor "OCT 3`4j),34 � .tom-?�taRt!-Fti�t 0 NP toot N C0 4 0 curb atop. t. :at'nx at7xT A,.t iOAtT'i 4v v P E 11) _MORC 2, Arad 6- crimped p4ta/ to tueb stop. ItEK &AWtA4kf SEWM SERWQ 143 tY3T A;.�Mf000)er A't A WATM , M4+`„T aA t. ViliA, taristotly Ault cuttt$e!" eazv no' aftalit,xttts-ter saC+,fdf crtl/Ot ectrntasat:iiurr N IHE SAME Vkfhr isSSALl A "t;kV1 META.. SEE PQcl S r4YFRT -0 3' AbOVE in the p ray zone. Poo boad4rg and banal ohal be a as tiMmT oboag, � 3, 'Ott tVCe iOvt m n tfle marl and curb box IiAAX APO PA447 MA E` Cf POST FLCAESCENT OPE-31 FAINT, 2„ A axis Mreer will be reipt#red to datotmtkte Shy 44pth of 0TV o +dilmlt he suns rrtr#ttotAA le, ;tot pgilnr,, r4t':I�tit'. eMt • ^ant Jos toorm-riml - ,; g CI.TA*1 rT Rr' 910M 0h F�tt`rATr :. fR-g7 +r T,if TANT17 r VAIN Tr H fou• gio*A1 a'nbtWm;lrt Xir4rGm+=ot it oft--clo Fh}e Aaanucttoa ergate4ttl 6 if " �" 9' arat}ar Barak to " of ttte dolt!+ eorvrvxC*n twe os stptod tit t4cilCrr fr rc gin #'Et'"T be acetttaice with MNDOT 310,2i1 courts 'Ate cegcte, C CILL414 TITER MCDA ArMft CACTI UN CVENT A C If TT1.TW 6 o m ?.t1 tri "h;� #atttt'rnr9ita :q:Her,. ` tk:Akre, 4.. AL- 04ig, v4AU. N:. rAjvtD Aw L,;AsULAik LRLIXA*, (41.481-4) 00 L iJLRSk 0_1-4 a< Trentm ittpts snoH coftforno to current 01HA rutt4 et;e ra9u1alforis tior CLcowrl MTH SENWFW, t, Alf tops �cgrlirtR is'Sd "' ats'krtiA^s-1 'frkv D7dd.`4 ism 0.1 '",lne CA`L 0492-m), $xem•V*vli rats ,v',k tfowhm t.. P'Etacgve G tS,/sFO7Mz".NT F40m KC:FTACk..E AFTER FW;H RArrl EL' Nt E, Saddes alrd to Smith Stak of qppriogrou equal as per s"Tian l 214 of t-s vo terrtan 4ec9cat,ats: TyY�,[C AL a«v NITAR Y N iR CA-"C-1 BASIN `���t�L � M SEWER RYCE �'0� PIPE BEDDING � �T � ��slr� UO man 27" DIAMETER WATER , LS`. tIIA1I'd 1� I I�� � IN POOR SOILS SEDIMENT TRAP wAtkIC-14 rr� t o.,1 gill" 1,10-10 4EY1gl'*;te f _ MAX NU... `SirHVICE EaANEF-RI ,-Ci-.r1rTMFIllT a.. ',.'v' :k�-tE T^A'tlEt, iPttrfEL;1NG DEPARTMENT 3103irlt,Y1 x[I(t1 r lsx ExIG9NEEiRING Dr-PARTMENt . 201 Itum 1-1t1 vutE d4 Lf A:uia � •fNc:=sacs+sls;a i#TEOc Jt7-.v pt A'r • r,T,: rot; WAtE: -- o_,-ta m1 - `"- ENfisrNEERING CAFBiIatETMT 5>�C}2A C' _ fXCP f _; C,EFAR7t,?D477 1{UTj FILE r4wt:c as\sxnA 14 CB-27so 11 WATER SERVICE 8 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 5 TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING FOR RCP AND DiP 2 CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAP 40 NOT TO SCALE 40 NOT TO SCALE 4'0 NOT TO SCALE 4 00 NOT TO SCALE 4-O NOT TO SCALE >Q, titV F'tkSts Ear.. 31(:11' :Of rgc•€x. ta::�ccmens. " nAftP f km i`�E� � ; ttim�a,*R ,wt. rarlUtra4 «�N tr" �WN AS TYPICAL .� ka it "o,,"t z,ax tepr; r.T wntwr `rqm y '"`,. '' tttd:p 'tta..r;enra Poo 0 51W) dfu '"i'� 6t RCi.*1 rH.ffi' STONE � ;s' T2"rn'e. :See States 2110 & 2 113 r—at ixvkla tsi'irA '4twt:i Ract e• r r� _ 1 fie etttwt 4 Ot'IiP Stutlu,'- 3Eif7E�lF7 i ;f Toe CiAtarce From Tlot Tot, Nut Of "hc 'Volvo. % a � ,.sc' q . r'' Tlu• rtacr Et Creator fn;t.r Gy . 12 r' p _... �" �� c.k ll �Mt;ic'Vst:cH �rtER '" rat cn SH A 4i. a`�y a Ar 1 w r ' T)OWFRa, Jf 7I tors rot c taa*�f " at Fbe , ! ^ Nanac o steps shoo,! be�� :enter. KkJT V J •""°` !"` wi. F1-" T 76" PraaadA 4�" ti 4t u:Airr ' F 'S"14Q4 siH't9i k '.T7 L^4wrt RR#°+RC,Rt J y r^ ^ " to Idol tr « . Ly Q N ,tea tI tg- crat% tint, i i,AS? I q} S itE 4kINAt Fie, ciam olo (4 f— „„.a^`"RR LI17t 2 to gait ortorrytes '°, .. r �f 4�° or 4. �` vw ntt tn;itepil Lt 60' apt tap et bort1x4l �� J 7 —1#t" YMv, aiijkvAYw%l � LLJ 0 1 'g „^�, Ai of•viA it Fnnrt+Atz+ t4: hcrue "}T"e%''t+F t Ra T v) rlf.prta+a, , ',. THAT'^»."*...,-..�,,"..,.....•''.,""C,+' E ,d i s Arketlts Cilfi, _ e1ne tick. H-tQ4!gr �����-.,--«�^" ,.,_ ""' ,dr �. ,� 1Yit+t`Af GjaAiva$r. � � t.�) LL.I SCA^C"+YSYK N^^S`uttt ,. �''` Tye ' t#o. ",.R 14` fete v bA#, sm'Asr tglCe. t"! 4'^-0' aa` = Z hiz "ttJ 'f 4 sure. 1 4" srait, A AnRatAttu tt" r.F '`"� I VR f,,-4` OtRE Tt# t ._... Z ?#' G ts, Y' �,;i r't7W+At`trir t F"YRhF:7:hM (j `*. r dz lt3m41tA'ifSTt MHy:MUV t ra.- pips t! M4 k." cut o`T i:' f'on the asuStlnr. Fte. ".#I 14" ., ss; a - '� ( < i ° rdt -—_.�... , ,P CO s>eurr^ tra ,' aim fkr.c- at tt Tstrindvnb^ vsd• • w % v 4,+ E Aa ".k.3' J6' ,.. Y .: AS 6MtE.t: `.ii 8Y Ste-,crax,, T: Firx, �x g' Otte WrAvva:Aoapte' gA.,4* ' : E Eff-. ` SRC A'ft` Z w ,, Met, 1F' � S Wth ar2tsxu)xo h `tk u' R' lA�t 0 z W y�:f2 itb ati 2c1' i CcvtoI 1/2- Ruitka- ' �.: NO..60 ng, T k tuf. r r$ Bctoti as 2 "''ice :.,9.:Aw i ST V) pr x oyoro,^ tips tm 1 tAdt _..Y; I Ti^c Cc!e Vli•+t'Ard �° .mom. a _ r•'- �--. 10 ML PL TIC J.NING— GCtC "ve- AauPt.4r' + I "� x�:a , s +.k : 'm,.,:,�,. >reCe it hoge,4.S Must be Ij2.or .'"-_� 1. %* V I 0 tfoAr itrd 1a (stlrsc end l rips Jerrrety and. 4oroc1.4o ivet y t ue4sr wa. WASHOUT AR, iidq0oxo " ottnr ttbt-colk,r5. Mmod ." i A Rn► rwt MiS5lit, cvw, Au*31, ; § .....: I ':R FoaP-iLYAFfT} lit `-,,,."`"'-- S. 1C�N A— L. Q E+brr "eta Cr ik tw . <195t6 id9' RP rouott Echo# tit s4egie" tra " ,or ti' d 4tH oP arm. 2Iz.iW L'l#ArtS1 '.A1"�+4u � R`°iETam! W4ige Ya4'ao � r d *, ra` y eN i {� Cin`amlag to AWWA i of armok mac pab is 6 y a- r ... Aa ... .. i! il" _. ^..,. 1h'd@6 i�" Roo to to +LI ti..r �« �H"A' Itim"a"'Irrtlx k?re cp"�al ln�traetA Rai ,i lne+wii"n nib tliezb,ne�a m1 P" rot evpkNr �` 42 1 A 4" J4R &it uhtA+c sritr>wt aIs v teS# ti1w» t tt+ TITHE F E L> n2"H l 4 Mr son 94' a it v!so akuctaro s tm r tsAn 45' eaianrmtee, t}'k AT d tJf Tim F#tt iglJ A 1 At 4T TtL'"t`V RE 14i THEI U 9b"-VA?" 1 t;r8 a T2"° T" sesatttit 2..0 a , i tN f4 am+l 2•. G d1NA i d t `I If 6" t's!t S-i£?Wt+k 1 Tdt SRiiR1'i4i Rvfi?) &Fa51 i yt 10 ATE+ED 011-'97E U� SISVAGi Tt^1: t4a toT A !MgAt.. kE AT AticlrcT trAtfl fhia 4. toorzA l gtktg l t. LEAST T14C RlitiiLW DSTANCC FAErm VIE RCf4T CF WAY AS R'..k ARE0 31' y�,y LOCA- ,A. iCi10N^ THIS WASHOUT AAE* :a00-1.. t.J.A1rJ JN ".nt�H A Ct'.,i.9iyrr„ 4t f*ink»tso canoesw :fAto s iw t to tambtrMrat rtt de 'tallo%t withawl tr sto i'wof4s.. ei tt+V1:.t WANNER SO THAT CgWRETE TAMS MAY PASS TH1T6 )Co' 14f, rNA3RIT !" i,rfeoo o0worise 4AAelltad" {... ... 1: All etotlAwm 04 G+t AT f+,ow retaforAed =mnorsts apeons air new Tt a &-oo mm4m WA rs-S tied marl: ty.'+7kitAr, AatT:h r, ao atiS drab mt the Gt+ltrtttiF. A 1C•R TC "N. 5T 'e ' & E$K$,.. Tt:: i T. F le ^+.. 04wo ztwt erdohoo w avian x. mtruC`-:e`A to artoxtruatgat suit :: of INS 4 t' , M*ILXIAL 444At. UL HlliftR QIO AM) 1ALA'Atl+ UVI AS - CIVIL Po ,t flont t orffA hrrtw :rtt '` � wotio, :reseed zaY a wltn+As4 pose. imia slit (UH{) marl ae 4xsRa'foa ne-i •:a er+s vj., N. 'T -0 MANTAIN A... TI life WASlOUT 00 AS At row.f ridntr4°cTim rmnrrail, font. nn etITIA o *thin ;o-a rkN9 sa ttA F"iou ?twat&" Cro•,;:reiir. FlOw'o, t. ' 1Ww ULIAF.'4 slit' &V4K Sid. .Wore+ ttitt ArR. tAts. (;;N%IeJ04X x w , :„-.. 0,4r Et Et?". TIC INI GI',T:Eti°. 4Ap 9 i a: i r St!he 1e4^ ++x regui�, tt thef : dnpt't M f �r.,4 ta.. tc`,ahc,..:fitrtP pipe ,matt to the 8, 1 A"iK1w TETx SAdd:4 EItTEttirf i�" pAiaT dkiT$i if' iiF P#Ff, bet2+4 .tw rawra: a tit Mt the at-uttiare; .S) I-* tiPAS11E%11 AREA #�,51 tA; ATEft 11iAT4 *3 FtlE'F TTx`GAR AiiY F "I. DETAILS 4. rrmh A Am *mfi roily to placed ar, rea�A.Ys whA" i ofP�mtea. & 44ULAT�1w SHALL'001. AT ,MY$ OY A 0INIMUMt Or 12'. A;1. TaE 9MA-'Ci'#UT AREA s;AJ=T HE VLF C!NTAI,. WA Titan` T`MICAL +",AVAL'4 FLARED END SECT**MAND bCtX IVSTALLAI ''fl lltifg � ��z� eCONC ETE SHEETi Qli INIIN'7 UL; TEO P F7 CR O SING STANDARD STORM dare-4`3L WASH U- AREA "Auk No � GNILI ING VLL 'ARTly hl l 101 * ; W w ynU1ti #T A! ttG.. v=ec t=> s EGi' h6EL�,trG Et PRT'4>Hti 'r nsec , a r; ; n t Pdfa 9,Ct_�,K` }'i't ., V ,k.. i:' 3.. M4YY. -" Cie ���:»:ti4r, bTEftr�T',JC�T' t_ a',4�.""f .t k ro � ...t t��} _ .xJ1`B�E. ��'t"*':Tii�%`��`'�iT 51334 . PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM 15 FLARED END SECTION 12 GATE VALVE AND BOX INSTALLATION 9 WATERMAIN STORM SEWER CROSSING 6 STANDARD STORM MANHOLE 3 CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA 4 O NOT TO SCALE 40 NOT TO SCALE 4 0 NOT TO SCALE 4 0 NOT TO SCALE 3 NOT TO SCALE C400 'U 12"CIO Z 6" OVERLAP '• .'< cl's> :e Ic i vwi;^ - $ F NOTE. 1. WATER TIGHT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED. '4 ir._.,w^'' $'4„ yr•, 7:A $Rir+ninauF ktat¢raaJ ', 4.*W' " & ,3 %�•,y' t„r 2. USE SCHEDULE 40 PVC ON ALL PIPES, UNLESS NOTED FILTER FABRIC 37n*,_ OTHERWISE. MN/DOT 3733 TYPE 1 iN ? `.• TT""-' `� r" t3 x . � ti x. ^. 3. THE DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR DRAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED •-� n ra �s s a .r, DOWNSPOUT BEFORE THE DOWNSPOUTS ARE INSTALLED ON THE BUILDING. 6" a• a Q frY ,• COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE CO MN/DOT 3149.2H 8., Js.' u 1rE^ rr7r1 a%arkrtr 4 .,: z FINISH FLOOR RIM ELEVATION, PERFORATED DRAIN TILE + t ') ,,�"''*"" M * fI4 a SEE SEWER TABLE SEE UTILITY PLAN. PIPE REFER TO MN/DOT " - « r �"3.p R, REFER TO SPLASH a PAD DETAIL BELOW. °co THERMOPLASTIC PIPE 3245 ij":'i"r' T r $rlu+ctinyu� F#uitiairr Y` .' Y€" * iy#" L "' I_I11-III-III= r� /..'r - rr °t # A tl - DRAIN TILE« >, �` $ !la u-1TI L�TL- H = PACK a•,� - kdr iRix t#F617 45' BEND (SCH. 40 PVC) �u 'i 74_ ` L ? h ��'r >� ,a£1 04 AND RISER PIPE r•" I µ .> x Ccanttc't.Gdrb en4 ;:,aattcr a a w w" N W :�,� k r1:v;.t T;s $i::i.ziJ.l3a,1>daA.i,.aN 1% MINIMUM SLOPE k _.:... 5:." I,,,_�•... tab"TfT. a "+".. fF"Fd F' t A IER •T'a V] s: PFF, (kA. �d A h'r.G,alEfF.LJ C»4Ad'U. R Eq. #�d�44N� f A-w .tsn o'iy w Sn rrPv ka [Ar4 a �. E >= } "` a ' Z TO 24' 9 to 2 LY Or;.:3 a RIP RA, �+" D 2 INVERT ELEVATION ° SEE 1/C200 Vey'Nawa tx:aa Pt Mudumpc. �`� 9 i 't. � z'r" 10 $3, =t to 20 CY LL" J LA or'?5 Cr �cOc �i�:,4" U REFER TO KEYED NOTES - - ( a.a " 2ti to '� C F CR ECifA_ FOR INVERT ELEVATION OF PROPOSED GRADE q ! „ m 3 " i , v Z ON UTILITY PLAN 9 CONNECTION ^ _. 54" AID iP a," _'y pratt up C...4 M V TO STORM SEWER. 4' TOPSOIL 1 l a "t3+e cubes„ r s>Gtf#t•tirttYnttlly Its) PROVIDE A 6' <.....-- b „ . �- Isjm B'Prtdmfnr.trc das'rat V � a CLAY CAP « '„F ».", pp ,� :•:. .rmfi ...._... Q S LLJ+ .....tea.,, 0 Q FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL r ' its"^" l__, ,•.; ,...,._._._...r.......„.. '..." t„'" O W GRANULAR MATERIAL HAVING LESS ' * « -� ``w ra Z w THAN 50% PASSING THE N0. 40 -. + "° `•""•' "'"""'" "•' �- SIEVE AND LESS THAN 5% - ` fT / fiJ a/2^utuWu "°� �� ``^ �Z PASSING THE N0. 200 SIEVE. :: $!s' "..•.�.._..,,,,. ` ° .; '+.".,,rsa Ci$ p"Alar T w '3d91.dEt', Z 0, Q'0, Z (DN C Jt7 ro'rtJ " y ! d``' -i '0 HLU z LU FLOOR SLAB 6 - .. . , A" lalr .r»._a t,tE"`• F'J' a ..^ ,g, kT?x W O Z p• �- W ,...' a 4f".. `4`x tt Mid 04� Gil � L O a PROPOSED COMMON BORROW ^� 4 t "; KIiJA V in m DRAIN SPOUT ,''r" s '^*'" +," °•-.>?`a p 0' 0` LOCATION DRAIN TILE PACK «tr /r'.r a+;.;, . '� - (n M d LL NEENAH CASTING a,! t r"`�� a,rErtr,ar BUILDING BUILDING FOOTING '" "` '�- CASTING ",/�A°r,`., �r 5. wg`Fia i FLOOR / __�, °, E.tUT"I ous Gut%} s ''�-tspxawxt ,alcx FSJtr (M1tC}C#f :ft .fit) F.F.E. = 924.50 LOCATION SIZE VARIES 'i. < e 4` ':htcae "camsed {- CONCRETE i tJ It SPLASH PAD 12 2 6 !� I"i't:1?SkYiebr', §,..:urb Port'tpa L 10 BUILDING PERIMETER DRAIN TILE tit fm�►t1� 5-1/2 ` ..;• 1/2" EXPANSION C401 NOT TO SCALE I 1Y_P!CCA1 CUII':.N m P ! « of Lti�T RIF'=rw,.,: JOINT AND GO I TLN :..,". TAIL �- nrCt treat ktv lllht�itf tt HAI�fCAEPi"I Ftaxr fc;. 521 SEAL BETWEEN a '� c, itS ry nqs nr _ -. ,r w u .:. • . `l" +r'V112i'v Z-TG P,ep1E Wf E LNt-INL-J; ktt UILPART*dEP.fi : 'u: FW-1"4 1 INO� Ti"+5at;;IT%MEPaT R' f o 9 J PIPE AND JOINT 3 ,�. v'r?5 Ss2R W/ NON -SHRINK GROUT walla� oNo" (IIIIII) o RISER PIPE o '..R.-'o.`, ,s / rl'/' a'"1'f.e'r'`.,'.r'.fi/.r''/lt`..^'..�'✓ " f . N o s %,` JM tint, GTnctsa :o >`r 4 NOEDTO scR�E N CURB RAMP 3-5 �� �I > 4 aco GRANULAR 0 t' r'' � +'' 95%, of t-e $t d" rP ,>s !a« 7 CURB &GUTTER C40 ' I � o N •- s$ BACKFILL "`""�°^�'�� C40 NOT TO SCALE �rn 0 a co z f Nor ro scALE 1 RIP -RAP 3 Z a o o we MN 314$.2B`ro a d r 9 (} vffillz�01�11l'rsr SECTION VIEW r` ,*sf'{/, z M .gE ,. /`r,..,' ' ,.'' ' .,''J',"°:✓/! �{ lt"' s g # `s,. a m W O C L (0 Y 6 gE I If < fmtma+'Mrrrml d } + s i �m RA #Ss °Td pill 6,. a. p 'rAR,149Lw .} w` a h lift o e. f t'a £ pp£ q 0 Q J s ♦♦yp 9 I f i s i G �. Q Z H r D "' ♦�crf cien . yy!4!�+� irY£"h * 9" F • $ q #.. y b > d O W w _ _ `� m •.�. ,^ 44tr00 IV0 e71- + q. $ s TS H 'R ,�::. 4.r�, 3 f a t 4 o IF Rmqjnari ^'f,±�HT -••i m � at to § 8 - .q z f t t I ®_ a Nrtc 1; " t# d z 4 Ya i t x �ss�z6E } s�€ T 11:±�E1 s g N't'' O O z s x Qf 4AI.N f" +ea� :egy#kg1I a9`'`e # Agsm `qd 'g., �m a an w an Z W Dicratter 44 PTf! i ` 6L gm�'t r n' pmy� gg�� fi �rp..1 r+. !�, ? 4 :p7 4q 7t� m Y„ } , �!y = O v t� $ SJr•'E. �i..NRir3 mm SSSSSS Al4as lCO�#rtl tl4: 3 1 j 9 ! r3 7A $ R ps isamttsr a e sY t" a t IAp s m y p 00 4" "Es rJ, gI 9 O o DRAIN DOWN SPOUT _ t{"; Jitw¢¢ w J Z 51"C-T 'to ROAMO Wi'r e m R a' ~ (SEE SECTION VIEW) i".r.Mr'' cme:ed rpiJk6vw fl:1 malparit 95 '° I %f0;lp�r„pa v O z p = w ^w Q O 6 10 PIPE T ,.•.`....»,.. ..i ' - w o PVC .._ • 4w„^.+,..., a m iM�..,� ". - 1M w w 0Fw- r,f l tl?iJT 38%r#;`2*4 O PLAN VIEW Y 1. A vA* 6'Ng000r at A.N r+v sa0 PO f,*t+s'M160 ff}ft d.E4h of th4 PTIF Ikaiaass',j*n E¢ 4 t RtsS 5 t3A5't: `•. s p bxdrn pt dftltstky It 1a.mdatian rna dfctl bw to acc arT aii;+x ., ( - I _ m d N,... ..,. �t"� Aitt MNtX,".'T M49,24 "pr*s, 10t4r�-^tg?''firJaid.. 2 cx JC. 1+109 shtit to UNDOT 31492`J saset jr ar Isom* alth IM% h_21 � � � s 3 13 DOWNSPOUT DRAIN WITH SPLASH PAD AND CASTING `°""° "/' Gists, ° " p"'° aW. � "°"'LIFO;!" I C401 NOT TO SCALE 1. Tt cn Napes mf�I confr sm to LVtr4Nt CrT�a rts�s �ma f"U100"M fo "•+ t taa4M ,EaEs LI a 0 ax+4+s+TY±anw rJYpV' rarro;-taAu.. /JATEs Ii " �o q r FOR r . t�r.k., -CIF},. � � � � � � � � t � � � � � � �`� � �' 0 TrP1G4i, 6* TWiE C3€ WAtK." µ 5' I. JA Sr T141-* b'Oi1 OOIAMEWk CAL DRIVLWAY OkCrS� r ' 4 I ^,. t r r r - i T .«• vpi j E fr;�,t+:, I�AriLa. cav L�a. �tx t� ,7wnva�rAY To a' �a �ms. I , r^Rf'ti,ANp4fA' fi"'.rf'f Afi A`10' � � � � ��� � � < �¢ a w 9 LL R2 t£iid�s4 4fu11 YY�'^f AJe,'i2"kfi Y}+'.r,Tff�i1 f`t rit'r+*tt' r?F, '�`iF1lC't rki,' `.._ p i°u w � ,t Avt:r€,aa9�. R.a IN fFE, .,"'J`f;, <L'L 411r. .,le.,.._ 6E • a..=rtrt+,rri. e.a p MAV MMM.3 >.R+YMiY M bMN!i A'jt 1 1 TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING FOR PVC CONCRETE �ff Pt:�f A1i,}t1 Ct�r Rt tTtp C401 NOT TO SCALE m S L)EMtAL Pt: jec ikr un CutL N-.trr1p*a` .,_!, 4`141 w:. P,' q' 4 of 6 � Pace ffof 5 ?;`:tart^ _ - P,,.:-iTdf`$+�iffl: i S,y. ,. -� }liY� "i.J. T{faei. `T :'.i•ad"�1,4 -um.. h svi`.!, Yt ��'t .... mC. _.NCltRAZN' 521t12" +_ xu;:u?pae,t�et;:fJ�, 6" OVERLAP FNaCr4FF=fN 1 TIFF'"of AFAIT `„' ``a'4. rsL 'tAbrE.a T,^§;L �t�`a.'sii. 8 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 4-5 FILTER FABRIC NOT TO SCALE MN/DOT 3733 TYPE 1 04 C`40 NOT TO SCALE C40 2 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 1-5 a y ar s+scm. q as mi Towed FITT@FSi rvwr SION3 6' may �aey an lord eci COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE `m C`4,o NOT TO SCALE aodiitst wrP uial*It}td Fd% *�2 I/:" sm- 1 45' *-NU 93' B 11ta Ik! MN/DOT 3149.2H mur,r, t IpYWrI416i U 'Wa'' ! tlt To rou'= PERFORATED DRAIN TILE rn+r)M cJ paJad to rmr In•erpr C 1 c -> I' 1 b 4 d1;• `J PIPE REFER TO MN/DOT ° ,Y Q 3, tff4s' ' 1w* 1*-t0 "-IT 3"-•4' 2'-0 4 8 2 u THERMOPLASTIC PIPE 3245 N 3 13Nrsnsloq A1,A2,A'W' shus,ln 5,3^ "� 0 7" TU '�° it 6 # 9 b d W 6 T1EG' to r4 avert p pnsstola i wtthaut Po+s sr!q with a.".. «"•.@'Jt (kJ.l AYN. MiUf. (kla Ys 0 r w y' 4 eDRAIN TILE wt 61Wt, r4. r,'..: a gY +t-� PACK t2s4 13ri . i � ' BITUMINOUS MATERIALirm -9'-;' 1N 17'_at 4 130 VWc: F�SIY'%4h Meow t�tvt ar+ ,_.. ., in as 130 i9O to y Q m • err•aY e e pfJ'" 2 44 t 4'2D t • f, AN nwwh OtrMIA xholt 4a T .zo t t sl y# t r i be 10a o s0 w1th vooAms BASE MATERIAL d f a � y th•t aT:lrgp+.tia err dagA!t 44F 144 i q } # " ~ � a t fell tSC N n bT�° i c - sta +sie4- 2f sa' _® q! 7 ' 3 p+ + & T V)- s cte s AETA11. " ` k i 3 q Fi LLJ Ln5 T r- ct + ° Yys- ,� Cci4 ? � 4p"s :.a„;LLj ( A ".. •. A i x 4" PERFORATED DRAIN 4:oo � C,t1- it -Ln d -1w : (8 °.Y1• 'r. �. $A�� 4;M11�a" � w � a� ,°P �, ��r ,�Ik. � O TILE WRAPPED IN PEA _ "r� » f, +I � raj „ N pa� •r r ROCK AND GEOTEXTILE Fr FABRIC t=j r'a / t a ,t _ i 4k Fa }JC3 tlUti 7 I LL a t S pp .J f �r # 4 Cn LL1 F,..AN. 127` i3L'ift :. IN AM 44* fiFru}s FRMT %1' ', .. ^'`^` TL, *' 4t A tx ffim 4" 30' MINIMUM 30' MINIMUM BAFFLEP T P ' iff� � 00 � ,�^ Ot. �t UENT '~` a 'S A,. 2=' � 11.. ,1 6 1 Ifa,9,�� + Fi A Z w V VA. A� MI IlMT d "YYC 0 4" DIAMETER 4" DIAMETER. „ .,�..... '• tri g9 d.�t i tart Aw A DRAIN TILE DRAIN TILE "•* t 1* STEEL w F � ' 1 to V) lai C TAuT . i°,1$E th.'AA4B. T, ° # {t r APlP,,ACRAk .' t JT vrl6 t -�w___ ` ° f f` 0 = p n E L7f;TA�. 1$ YYaEa"�'dC� ..%� �y 4 �:. r� � � 9�h � ;P > Y� '" ,. ..."a.,•.,".<,."...... yy is j� a er t7{.6itki € � T Ml,bt �. F t �t" 4� r CONC. CURB AND GUTTER SECIr Lr41 A -A ' t/2" KHG's CATCH BASIN SIMAgkgEsy Pt 1 sr i� s �� +a °},+'O„")"i'"""E 1) A MINIMUM OF 60 FEET OF DRAIN TILE SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS. #t4sN�f T �s + ItIPS W 2) 4" PERFORATED DRAIN TILE WITH GEOTEXTILE SOCK SHALL BE PLACED IN A MINIMUM tbs tsnerk 40*1 dmet r t ex ass the stair fitbird 1r y 0 tas s 6 '$ � "�" 4 T CIVIL OF 12" OF FINE FILTER AGGREGATE (4" DIA. PEA ROCK). khJs wsclRc pro,+tst, It ss tNe s rvspnaastr-e4yat tbedecsyn ergs»t• .c t#Yc{. ti°,a desFps..k sm tcmpitararxe sith w1 fkable lass m,s4a#allarse. ....__. :_; - " ' ,. ° ... a.t.., , -•.'.: �� .m, ��>>MIl an F, _,.hirA.rt DETAILS �'-PLa-- 3) THE FIRST 18" AT CATCH BASIN SHALL BE SOLID WALL SCH 40 PVC.tA ,pe,°+ t {x wtIni BAFFLE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE PLACED BEHIND THE PROPOSED CURB LINE. _ Off &Ve°tlk,d�Cl£rR .I.tn>, SHEET 4) MAINTAIN POSITIVE SLOPE AWAY FROM CATCH BASIN AT ALL TIMES. DRAIN TILE BTA NCrARb SUMP t.:nrsw, l4 cr 's SLOPE SHALL MATCH PROPOSED AT GRADE SLOPE OR 0.5 PERCENT, WHICH EVER IS .,ft" -, of r„ GREATER. 14 THRUST BLOCK DETAIL FOR MECHANICAL PIPE BENDS ' 1.4 MTVF'stt i1 tdS1 rn 5) FOR CATCH BASINS NOT LOCATED IN A CURB LINE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXTEND DRAIN • S.vv2PiEEES'!Uf `EPRTriF-t+$r 't'i) vt « FLA"'F m,C:.. r-� NOT TO SCALE r N.< a \-cr r l EftE l f _ F I'd=� E.,+fi ? i_Pt C401 TILE IN 4 DIRECTIONS, IN THE SHAPE OF AN 'X', FOR 15-FEET FROM EDGE OF CATCH t1ts C rIt rhb Es ' g:!_•E6R BASIN STRUCTURE. PROJECT NO: 2000.01 6) NO DRAIN TILE WILL BE ALLOWED WITHIN 10-FEET OF ANY WATER LINE. RZ'ro`d*' - a4-i4 ,� T t tE it•7 5• DRAWN BY: NPA _�_ � � << "„r' �"E Ci'�.�"t�iEERit�C uEf*,��TtdE'�1, :,���,��+ CHECKED BY: KAM 12 DRAIN TILE FOR LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 9 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE W SUMP 3 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 2-5 C401 NOT TO SCALE C40 NOT TO SCALE C40 NOT TO SCALE r6PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 5-5 C401 C40 NOT TO SCALE 'U z H U W o' 10' o' , o' 10' 10' x 3/8" STEEL PLATE AT TOP, O.C. O.C. o.c. O.C. O.C. 0.c. 12' MIN. SLOPE DOWN, WELD ALL SIDES VARIES VARIES VARIES VARIES (�1i METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO MN 8-INCHES OF FILTRATION MIX 8-INCHES OF FILTRATION MIX RAIN GARDEN 7. STATE STATUTE WHITE RAIN GARDEN AA T'FF LEGEND AND BORRDERDER O ON BLUE PLANTS PARKING BACKGROUND, FULLY REFL-_CTORIZED `?'1 S( S�OQE 3,� PLANTS to VEHICLE ID ATTACH 6" X12" "VAN ACCESSIBLE' 0'OF 1- S(Op 1 SHOP -1 ELI ON = 906.85 ��- _ — F S'• REQUIRED SIGN TO POST IF APPLICABLE - �(� �/ "—I -1Tr < _ = A �T.... ..r:':'. TION.O� _ - - ELEVA ` UP 70 $200 FINE 6" i6 GA. 2�-INCH OD GALVANIZED CLEAN WASHED SAND L i .>: CLEAN WASHED SAND l FOR VIOLATION STEEL SIGN POST MEETING ASTM C33 1b l 1 CONCRETE SAND r ".. t .III=T MEETING ASTM C33 CONCRETE SAND rn rF NV. 905.18 """ I. Vq, lES -1� INIM —III— ` SCARIFY BOTTOM of INV. 901.67 _ V 1 INIM M �1 1'I SCARIFY BOTTOM OF V AccessleLE WHERE CONCRETE OCCURS AT BASE USE _l fT' TI-L ' TfT--fi-> �T' -= BASIN TO A DEPTH OF 911If-1 J.-]JIB--J—III-1—L- — —� I�—Ill BASIN TO A DEPTH OF Z u i r—i a ,Tf—rrt—Tl—rr—m -r -r�— 18" TAKE CARE NOT TO iTi iTi i- i—� iTi iTi iTi—T�Ti ��J1m1L� ^ 4'-0" MIN 1-1/7' EXPANSION MATERIAL AND 18". TAKE CARE NOT TO M N DRAIN TILE 8" RE -COMPACT SOIL p "t 12" MIN. URETHANE CAULK. FROM BOTTOM OF 10-INCHES IMPORTED CUSTOM MIXED DRAIN TILE 8" RE -COMPACT SOIL Q Ln G BASIN SOIL BLEND OF 95% WASHED SAND AN 4 INCH SDR 35 PVC FROM BOTTOM OF 10-INCHES IMPORTED CUSTOM MIXED O Lo F 10:1 SLOPE 5% IRON FILINGS. SUBMIT MIX DESIGN PERFORATED DRAIN TILE SPACED BASIN SOIL BLEND OF 95% WASHED SAND AN 4 INCH SDR 35 PVC Q ME IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SHOP DRAWING FOR APPROVAL. 5% IRON FILINGS. SUBMIT MIX DESIGN PERFORATED DRAIN TILE SPACED LLu ~ V FFFNO 10' O.C. ACROSS BOTTOM OF SHOP DRAWING FOR APPROVAL. O 10' O.C. ACROSS BOTTOM OF N Q BASIN. SURROUND DRAIN TILE O w BASIN. SURROUND DRAIN TILE Y N WITH 3" OF #57 STONE. Z .— = PARKING WITH 3" OF #57 STONE. 10 cn O p w 4" LONG STUDS WELD AT NOTE: 0LU NOTE: Lu 3'-0" QUARTER POINTS 8" ON CENTER REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR RAIN GARDEN PLANTINGS, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR RAIN GARDEN PLANTINGS, 0 Z 2 V w ANY FILTRATION MIX SHALL BE MIX A AS DEFINED BY THE MINNESOTA FILTRATION MIX SHALL BE MIX A AS DEFINED BY THE MINNESOTA O O Z Ow 3'-6"a STORMWATER MANUAL F- �o ,0 STORMWATER MANUAL 60-70% CONSTRUCTION SAND MEETING THAN % CLAY Lu O c` 0, as TIME CONCRETE BASE 15-25% TOP SOIL MEETING WITH LESS THAN 4% CLAY CONTENT 60-70% CONSTRUCTION SAND MEETING ASTM C-33 w � Z Q O• � w 15-25% TOP SOIL MEETING WITH LESS THAN 4% CLAY CONTENT 04 Oq a U N 15-25% ORGANIC MATTER MEETING MNDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST 15-25% ORGANIC MATTER MEETING MNDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST o w O Off. `n COVER BOTTOM OF BASIN WITH 4-INCHES OF DOUBLE SHREDDED 0, L --1 4• COVER BOTTOM OF BASIN WITH 4-INCHES OF DOUBLE SHREDDED o O HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED MAT. HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED MAT. lt co co a LL REFER TO MnMUTCDSIGN R7-1 � SIGN DETAILS�R 5 FILTRATION BASIN #5 DETAIL 4 0 NOT TO SCALE 40 NOT TO SCALE BASIN 1 D ETAI L 7 ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POST - IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 40 NOT TO SCALE 10' 10' 10' O O.C. O.C. o.c. PLACE STEPS ON RIGHT HAND SIDE (III'IIIIIII o s" WHEN FACING DOWNSTREAM. 3/8" STEEL PLATE AT TOP, VARIES VARIES 12" MIN. SLOPE DOWN, WELD ALL SIDES co o co g 8-INCHES OF FILTRATION MIX ( I 't j e'" METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO MN STATE 3. PLANTS al RDEN E 3 Z co ao o 19 STATUTE 169.346 WHITE LEGEND AND _I I S(Op , AR; — I I I o g °0 Z ° x BORDER ON BLUE BACKGROUND, m W m v co z PARKING FULLY REFLECTORIZED LOPEiGROUT;' � iii� '�. F ELEV N .S� // 1I� w W o n In 0 g L z t a..M o ATTACH 6" X12' "VAN ACCESSIBLE' I I T Z 2 Lu F_- e E co VEHICLE ID '..'.`� . + C, C c REQUIRED SIGN TO POST IF APPLICABLE SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR NEENAH CLEAN WASHED SAND T _]� w MW cal c O m =g PLAN MEETING ASTM C33 _— tb �1 CASTING INFORMATION. co.2 d w m CONCRETE SAND Ti=- 16 GA. 2j-INCH OD GALVANIZED I—_, gE UP TO 8200 FINE U ©z E w STEEL SIGN POST !twill, = VA I .-i'�. MINIM M 1777TTT��� SCARIFY BOTTOM OF FOR VIOLATION MINIMUM OF 2, MAXIMUM OF 4 INV. 915.10 _ " u CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGSBASIN TO A DEPTH OF 5 -o" ALLOWED. TrIT � iTnl I �T�II III III T � �I � � I � T TIT �� VAN 18". TAKE CARE NOT TO z DRAIN E 8° RE -COMPACT SOIL WHERE CONCRETE OCCURS AT BASE � ACCESSIBLE 'O �.���`.'- '�`��'�s� "I�1• FROM BOTTOM OF 10-INCHES IMPORTED CUSTOM MIXED Z Q Q � 4'-0" MIN USE 1-1/2" EXPANSION MATERIAL BASIN SOIL BLEND OF 95% WASHED SAND AN 4 INCH SDR 35 PVC w w AND URETHANE CAULK. �: 5% IRON FILINGS. SUBMIT MIX DESIGN PERFORATED DRAIN TILE SPACED c - 12" MIN. 27" SHOP DRAWING FOR APPROVAL. 10' O.C. ACROSS BOTTOM OF 0 10:1 SLOPE BASIN. SURROUND DRAIN TILE a 3 In n PERVIOUS SURFACE WITH 3" OF #57 STONE. G z 5 NO MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH R1981J REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR RAIN GARDEN PLANTINGS, T co 4" LONG STUDS WELD AT OR EQUAL, 15" O.C. ALUMINUM FILTRATION MIX SHALL BE MIX A AS DEFINED BY THE MINNESOTA O � w d w 5F PARKING n QUARTER POINTS 8" ON CENTER STEPS APPROVED. STORMWATER MANUAL p w Z ~ 3'-� ') 60-70% CONSTRUCTION SAND MEETING ASTM C-33 w w Q Z r 15-25% TOP SOIL MEETING WITH LESS THAN 4% CLAY CONTENT - z o ILL ANY 3'-6" VARIES REINFORCED PRECAST CONCRETE 15-25% ORGANIC MATTER MEETING MNDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST m g w z d TIME CONCRETE BASE MANHOLE SECTIONS SHALL COVER BOTTOM OF BASIN WITH 4-INCHES OF DOUBLE SHREDDED w v O CONFORM TO ASTM C478 HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED MAT. _ ✓'i : w O o STANDARDS. ALL JOINS IN MANHOLE TO 14 0 '� HAVE "0" RING RUBBER GASKETS 2 FILTRATION BASIN #2 DETAIL REFER TO MnMUTCD 40 NOT TO SCALE SIGN R7-1 FOR SIGN DETAILS. L� SNOUT, ENVIROHOOD, OR IPE SHALL BE CUT OUT FLUSH Z APPROVED ALTERNATE WITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL. O ru 8 ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POST: GRASS AREA PLACEMENT d NOT TO SCALE o 10' 10' O.C. O.C. o.c. o. CIL VARIES VARIES L� N MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS 6" FOR 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" 8-INCHES OF FILTRATION MIX ^ FOR EVERY 4' OF DEPTH GREATER RAIN GARDEN (— PLANTS THAN 14'. 1 .I `T•7 S J IV p = !Op /// 1 5 a —I F ELEVATION = 911.DO = .All1 7 i SECTION CLEAN WASHED SAND I�= MEETING ASTM C33 b. CONCRETE SAND _mr, Imo,"' 6 SUMP CATCH BASIN MANHOLE INV.908.67 -_- 1 �� 40 NOT TO SCALE IIII I— _ 12"1i11NIIMII— LITTI SCARIFY BOTTOM OF -=1.�Lu ,�1.�1=11=1 I'll=�-1 BASIN TO A DEPTH OF 18. TAKE CARE NOT TO DRAIN TILE 8" RE -COMPACT SOIL FROM BOTTOM OF 10-INCHES IMPORTED CUSTOM MIXED BASIN SOIL BLEND OF 95% WASHED SAND AN 4 INCH SDR 35 PVC 5% IRON FILINGS. SUBMIT MIX DESIGN PERFORATED DRAIN TILE SPACED SHOP DRAWING FOR APPROVAL. 10' O.C. ACROSS BOTTOM OF BASIN. SURROUND DRAIN TILE WITH 3" OF #57 STONE. NOTE: REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR RAIN GARDEN PLANTINGS, FILTRATION MIX SHALL BE MIX A AS DEFINED BY THE MINNESOTA STORMWATER MANUAL' 60-70% CONSTRUCTION SAND MEETING ASTM C-33 15-25% TOP SOIL MEETING WITH LESS THAN 4% CLAY CONTENT 15-25% ORGANIC MATTER MEETING MNDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST COVER BOTTOM OF BASIN WITH 4-INCHES OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED MAT. 3 FILTRATION BASIN #3 DETAIL ^40 NOT TO SCALE I— V J cf) W W Q LLI 10' 10' 10'-- � O O.C. O.C. O.C. (~/j W Z VARIES VARIES 7 Z_ lo 8-INCHES OF FILTRATION MIX RAIN L OO 3, PLAN SGARDEN O Q Z 11 7 S( Sv11 OpF Z W TI 717 Q ELEVATION = 912.00 . , CC/ CLEAN WASHED SAND MEETING ASTM C33 'tb CONCRETE SAND INV. 909.s7 =_— .... rill=ll' = V Vij, lE$ -12. MINIM : i �� �T" SCARIFY BOTTOM OF �Tf(T;IT-I—I_-II[=11I III;,LIJTIIInlll lli— 11 If 11 BASIN To A DEPTH of DRAIN TILE 8" 18". TAKE CARE NOT TO FROM BOTTOM OF 10-INCHES IMPORTED CUSTOM MIXED FROM SOIL BASIN SOIL BLEND OF 95% WASHED SAND AN 4 INCH SDR 35 PVC CIVIL 5% IRON FILINGS. SUBMIT MIX DESIGN PERFORATED DRAIN TILE SPACED SHOP DRAWING FOR APPROVAL. 10' O.C. ACROSS BOTTOM OF v BASIN. SURROUND DRAIN TILE DETAILS WITH 3" OF #57 STONE. NOTE: REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR RAIN GARDEN PLANTINGS, SHEET FILTRATION MIX SHALL BE MIX A AS DEFINED BY THE MINNESOTA STORMWATER MANUAL 60-70% CONSTRUCTION SAND MEETING ASTM C-33 15-25% TOP SOIL MEETING WITH LESS THAN 4% CLAY CONTENT 15-25% ORGANIC MATTER MEETING MNDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST COVER BOTTOM OF BASIN WITH 4-INCHES OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED MAT. �� PROJECT NO: 2000.01 ( 4_) FILTRATION BASIN #4 DETAIL DRAWN BY: NPA nlnT Tn crel c CHECKED BY: KAM C402 D �HYo T do�`e.] 2 ti0', iF OT.9 UB srs 5 c b s TO p .mo.2 ,d a B q eon] ^5y® �O rc /TO OU Poza / 5475 1I� „ IoIT 5475 R el .o D111RON ON \ A (j T" em.] '9112 a° MONUMENT MI 0 Py5 107,4 Q�S Bloco 10 11.9 M1` 9114 ,. V BII.B elC 8�F 900. e+. c\> *c rc v 911.a / � �� / •p0]J \ cr rc 2 � j rc a`?nj4J� .J 90fl4 •904J RT LINE _p4',.9THE SOUP cc� 6�n1a2 23S FEET OHE S i'4 a THE SW Y4 OF SEC/ 3 128 vpl2o G BII.9 \S / CV q1 9 aBC89 •M.] x908.4 'b 05 r \ Tc Ta ^j fl99 ap e, wv 1ao (� Iz.e o`�59 all.] a A •BB9.4 .9W.4.I TO 9 (-J\ *e/[.9 �8�..112 \ \Are.o C U L T I V A T E D F I E_I..e' / •9f 1.. i 9n �r \ \ TCJ'1 4 0\Y \ w0162 n910.1 911.0 .911] M1, `H9 T11 � 1ae �,Btf.3 .efa6 /. I "' /. /'9 TC .] .8 .R 0 f/ .911.z I9 /� y Fes5KQ RLa �} ,,,..� /'� •91z6 / 14751•fM IR /^ ,pY Tc"/ //� 1E.1 \ 916.6 •9u`-;,] �, •911.a / / ONJ �` 1 IJ.S / lt�{ .B 9 J 1 / °/I Alfi.l 911J BI4.4 �.000 .Way \�\ B o a v9122 l �' SSW EDGE owt .91].6 '�� __ -e8fa. •�"- l `91s / Y p/ ja ,3 / / `Rd �= 3. f SN I.e j y /�/A/4" ,919.e ~_ \, -- •efa.4 '�'-- .�91s.]_. 4�1 .01]J //"'' •BIB. /y�ll 0I79 /9194 ? �O:/- .91oz �z O Tn aB. o.e er #1 BIB.e f •91a.5 le.] �.91T6-/ ) � / / � �•1 V., TI CP-91I/Y.q 4'INVmPo .I 912. •918.J---9/9/' a019.a ^,i ( _- •919.8 l/ 91 a 913E / \ \ 126� . .9fSJ BC I. 3.4 0 r 0'Y° BIB.B J•999.0•BI9.B r,� •820.1 � \ � / n92f 2L4 AI \ •p2a � .MI.9 Tc CGNC „Y'� / ✓ ,920.J ,920.1 .9199 9/ .9 / *01 200 .920.1 v02L9 1 9 FOUND h SOLID �i i•9z1.1 -``9204 cx •9n.z s1 IRON MONUMENT gam.--'-;621.i \9z1`RTH LINE OF iH� 7y5EC 24�9221 \ / CB LC2 9z. .92LI v92L2 \ vp2L5 v921.J f4.J T09 Bf2.a /.921.2 9•d1.B .9• 9 TO w -99z � �� \ 9 ✓ / Bue \ -�� •e OUNR R BAR .!s • l32 TO \ RI\Gi`{T OF WAY TAKEN PEQ99i9 "�1.% 'M2 /_ ` .\ `921.3 Bv� .s o •92z9/ YYY Tc, „21p MNDOT ROW PLAT yS1 r6 17 ,,,�- .e2zJ B 821] WATER l 1 Pose w 905 8 V ll \ N \ ) CP S__ •N115.0 n9211 C�1•�[�BTJ. BITS 9144 / 91�. '6Y / �j// 9 • B21 ?\ • 9 /.0z1R.%" v 02A� �J "-_ 4 �1v210 � / .0 3.1 TC „p J y /� ,9244-•y"24.0 /+ 0 14 Bzl.9 0215\ -MIL. / w02w sO ,92Aa 'BT vA \\ A �sB '924.8 /� � r \ ic,.6 ! 1. •zT/ //�� 3 "� / Z �._ •Bz3s ` EDGE OF FIELD\ '\\ ,BTaS / •Bz4.s \ by �9a\ i BTO TOI4.T 912 j ��5/I/?/� �- y1g,\ vBTf5 .//J/� A ' \ r825.B ` / ]„a229 36 B 1/ x5 �J „ 9T34 / T' '� 1• e 4. / \ \' .92- J920'2 • 9254 B 9TI.a ..2.r{�B�y� 0.., I ,.T� / ,926B21.e .5 CULT AT D FI EL0 I Cy�fl9IT `+ .9ze.a \\ .92s4 .92e.4 zl , BI4. 821.9 011.9 C� TC ° S 1 / I \ �_ �_ % .O'4,B T6.B >Ty�q- T I x BM5 .3 4I9J tv, 919.7 376,546 sq ff.' \ `9z+.3 9xz.p 6 " N/y 26.4 S`Wk"J5 '02,.5 ry OT].0 02 .3 B 0 919.5 `"{l f.� N �_ 1814.0 `YIC56'=% YB219 0 �\ / .0 T 9xT4 .B26s =92e.1 .vTJ.] .aTo \ \ lj/ M.�\92 .9 / 6,Y a BT29 9 / 11110 , Y c 916.4 TC 5 / / 2L2 B2IIANN] / V. 010.0 \ ,7 \ / / xBT.M1.B/�9<� 'h4' I n920.4 BTB.I ij xB24.6 I \ lI_ B2flJ T.T 0II -924.4 / .92& a z 9re.4 IBA fl1�2 w10 N M. I 92I'$h INAD RL „ nal' 0)II �r fll \ \ / / •9A� \ /� 1 475 1R� / 9216 I ONUMEffT �Cj \ i TCIe 9�1.o r: \ \_ \ \ \ sS•!p \ \ �/� 9 / / / `\� -�� "9x' 23 fJ� I I/9I3.� I9.0 \w \\ •".�\ \x'�,i / •W' / BTPS Bzo.9 -_ ``\ \ 22.6 9 920.1 9x1.x BT a 1e.1 �'- 91 .f c / I � _�9� \` ^- _\ \� \ �_ 911"' -921,7 _ o TM-9 19Os ✓ ap {j 1 BIE.4T. B9.4 TO qIP&- _\ �_. __/ i'/ \S \ ,BTLB To _ice at3 o a y sa rc 1s. z 9 -9H- - .�.^\ .`�._ y...{ fll4.e /" -�.. \ .DIQ.] _,0 ( n1 m L�ZSF WAY -TAKEN -PER._\, �\"�.,. /' vflllz al / MNp9S..LOp�PL7IT�Q�_18-1% .�\�� \�� �.� .'�'\ ./ I9Ya9 IBIB.O er 2 �iTY-A T F\�--f-I \ `/ l/ w B ) x 9f].B \ 0y� 913.E _� \ \ vfll]J - Bly.'�IBa�e.l� \ o 9063f J,a4 .910.4 M14 �� \ 1 V) flld3 l (� .T Sf9.0 /'� 62. SY 098.1 e \ "\��� Poe. ' W BIT.4 TL �, ( ( '' NO°0�32'�.� \ \ "T \m� V- iC m BB].a �* v918.5 i.zP 01 221 W] EDGE OF FlEFO \ xma.J \ .BILJ U nzo I �'% \ \\\ \\\.a\ \ \\ \ 1- FOUND \af4.4 N�=- p 012.T�9166, - 0 9KGA11NUM RAW \ TO iL" .6053 •9P��„BBA .B BB].0 \ �\ MONUMERT 9107 / p� l\•\{'\`� \q�`�y�...-__ �Tk-9 C'Y,5"=TJI�'-'.�JO ,�"-.JH-' _._ =• -965- .9ce.z � .9o>.a 4 //B/QB.e _ 4,03,�--.- Bt6.l 91]. TO 9TC ® \SSS\ 90ZQ_. -+BBLO -� �• -_ _-. 9/ -- 91 hYQH- 011.1" - TL E.Df` MOWED' ,^- �/� 01&1 vlez p- n. \_ft \-/29p"_' _..+0w.e ,saes _� ._p 9/d- .-.-_ ry,c�- L�r� +az0.$ G R A 5 5 919.0 91T.0 B r x+Y�t -J3Zt45 _'�T1s 0ae Bn an '17A Bn..WALL 1;aTA Tlxlat---s,`%1wiww�__ �_Btt.O" aV. -Wi4 f.DNG TO fl4 WMH TO Br9' wyO A AN Inr\T F-)I/\I IT /1 r' IA/A\ 1�1 AT N1r1 9 fl q -T IVIIVVVI I\IVTII Vi Vv r_�I r L./-(I Iv\./. 1lJ -" 1 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 50 1 =so EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS DRAINAGE AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) TOTAL AREA (ACRES) 2-YEAR (2.87") 10-YEARU100C (4.26") YEAR (7.38") SNOWMEEVENT (10.90") ROUTING 1 0.00 3.40 3.40 7.10 12.52 23.06 2.44 OFF -SITE NORTH 2 0.00 3.78 3.78 8.84 15.56 28.45 2.72 OFF -SITE SOUTH 3 0.00 1.46 1.46 3.21 5.66 10.38 1.05 OFF -SITE EAST TOTAL 0.00 8.64 8.64 19.15 1 33.74 61.89 1 6.21 NORTH 0.00 3.40 3.40 7.10 12.52 23.06 2.44 1NORTH SOUTH 0.00 3.78 3.78 8.84 1 15.56 28.45 1 2.72 1 SOUTH EAST 0.00 1.46 1.46 3.21 7 5.66 10.38 1 1.05 EAST r a; I7W-T�Bp I 6w_ozoDf I � 1 Ili I o /PI & ��l } /P' RO' 1 sr s la• 7 o / g1 y/ A * N�-Bgi 0%I / � 00 _ \_. ♦ I �� �.� ,k / 1I`IF P-P f T • • u\ T ��� �I In if re 2 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 50 1 =60 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS DRAINAGE AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) TOTAL AREA (ACRES) Q OUT (CFS) STORM EVENT 2-YEAR (2 87") 10-YEAR (4 26") 100-YEAR (7.38") SNOWMELT (10.90") ROUTING 1 0.00 0.70 0.70 1.01 2.11 4.49 0.51 OFF -SITE SOUTH 2 1.63 1.32 2.95 - - - - FILTRATION BASIN #1 3 0.90 0.64 1.54 - - - - FILTRATION BASIN #2 4 0.31 0.60 0.91 - - - - FILTRATION BASIN #3 5 0.24 0.15 0.39 - - - - FILTRATION BASIN #4 6 0.90 1.03 1.93 - - - - FILTRATION BASIN #5 7 0.05 0.17 0.22 0.54 1.00 1.95 0.16 OFF -SITE EAST FILTRATION BASIN #1 - - - 0.15 0.73 17.06 1.80 OFF -SITE SOUTH FILTRATION BASIN #2 - - - 0.16 0.30 3.36 0.38 OFF -SITE SOUTH FILTRATION BASIN #3 - - - - - - - FILTRATION BASIN #4 FILTRATION BASIN #4 - - - - - - - FILTRATION BASIN #5 FILTRATION BASIN #5 - - - 1.68 7.54 18.71 1.76 OFF -SITE NORTH TOTAL 4.03 4.61 8.64 3.54 11.68 45.57 4.61 NORTH 1.45 1.78 3.23 1.68 7.54 18.71 1.76 NORTH SOUTH 2.53 2.66 5.19 1.32 1 3.14 24.91 2.69 SOUTH EAST 0.05 0.17 0.22 0.54 1 1.00 1.95 0.16 EAST STORMWATER RUNOFF SUMMARY 2-YR STORM (2.87") RUNOFF (CFS) 10-YR STORM (4.26") RUNOFF (CFS) 100-YR STORM (7.38") RUNOFF (CFS) 100-YR SNOW MELT (10.90") RUNOFF (CFS) EXISTING SITE 19.15 33.74 61.89 6.21 PROPOSED SITE 3.54 11.68 45.57 4.61 PROJECT NARRATIVE THE SITE IS A 8.64 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST. CURRENTLY THE SITE IS A FARM FIELD USED FOR ROW CROPS. A MAJORITY OF THE SITE DRAINS TO THE CULVERTS/STORM SEWER LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF THE SITE. A PORTION OF THE SITE ALSO DRAINS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE EAST. ALL DRAINAGE IS VIA SHEET FLOW AND SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW. NO STORM WATER MANAGEMENT IS CURRENTLY BEING PROVIDED FOR THIS SITE. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF AN APPROXIMATE 55.000 SQUARE FOOT SENIOR HOUSING BUILDING AND 9 TOWNHOME BUILDINGS. PARKING, WALKING PATHS, AND SIDEWALKS WILL BE PROVIDED TO SERVICE THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR THE SITE WILL BE PROVIDED VIA 5 FILTRATION BASINS ON THE SITE, SUMP CATCH BASINS, AND GRASS SWALES. DUE TO THE CLAY ONSITE SOILS INFILTRATION IS NOT FEASIBLE. SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS THESE SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE (AERIAL RADIUS) OF THE PROJECT LIMITS AND RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE. DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THESE SPECIAL ADN IMPAIRED WATERS, THE BMPS DESCRIBED IN APPENDIX A OF THE NPDES PERMIT WILL APPLY TO ALL AREAS OF THE SITE. WATERBODY IMPAIRMENT(S) LAKE RILEY NUTRIENT/EUTROPHICATION TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS: TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL BE PROVIDED PER APPENDIX A, SECTION C.1.B OF THE MPCA GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT. ENGINEER ANTICIPATES THAT, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FILTRATION MEDIA AND DRAIN TILE. CONTRACTOR WILL USE PROPOSED FILTRATION BASINS AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS. ANY TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL BE LEFT AT LEAST TWO FEET ABOVE THE PROPOSED FINAL GRADE. SURFACE WATER SHALL BE REMOVED BY SKIMMER DEVICE SUCH AS FAIRCLOTH SKIMMER OR THIRST DUCK, OR USING A PUMP WITH A FILTER. ALTERNATIVE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO USE. IN LIEU OF USING TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS, THE CONTRACTOR MAY PHASE THEIR CONSTRUCTION SO THAT NOT MORE THAN 5 ACRES OF AREA IS DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. FULL STABILIZATION OF THE DISTURBED AREA IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO DISTURBING ADDITIONAL AREAS. (IMPAIRED ONLY) STOCKPILES: ON -SITE STOCKPILES OF SOIL SHALL HAVE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL. STOCKPILES SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH BLANKETS, TARPS, OR HYDRO MULCH IF LEFT ON -SITE FOR MORE THAN 14 (7 IMPAIRED) DAYS. SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND BMP MAINTENANCE BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. NAME: ------- ------- CERTIFICATION DATE: -------------------- MINIMUM ESTIMATED QUANTITIES FOR EROSION CONTROL ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED QUANTITY DRAINAGE STRUCT. INLET FILTER 11 EACH ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EACH CONCRETE WASHOUT 1 EACH SILT FENCE 4230 LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 8533 SY EROSION CONTROL MAT 183 SY NOTE: QUANTITEIS SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED, ADDITIONAL QUANTITIES MAY BE NEEDED IF REQUIRED BY THE MPCA, WATERSHED DISTRICT, OR CITY. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL DETERMINATION OF QUANTITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SCHEDULE OF CONSTRUCTION 1. INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL 2. STRIPPING OF TOP SOIL AND ROUGH GRADING 3. INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES 4. INSTALLATION OF BUILDINGS 5. INSTALLATION OF STORMWATER FACILITIES AND FINISH GRADING. 8w 0 e z or9.a rtv- 6 CD ��b4 00 ti FjF \\ sww rro-9oe.e WATER (i ABBREVIATIONS BLDG Building BMP Best Management Practice BW Bottom of Wall CB Catch Basin CONC Concrete ELEV Elevation EX Existing FFE Finished Floor Elevation HWL High Water Level INV Invert MAX Maximum MH Manhole MIN Minimum Minnesota Pollution Control MPCA Agency National Pollutant Discharge NPDES Elimination System NWL Normal Water Level PVC Polyvinyl Chloride RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe TW Top of Wall W.O. Washout NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLETE, SIGN, OBTAIN OWNERS SIGNATURE, PAY FEE, AND SEND IN THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CERTIFIED EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR. SWPPP DOCUMENTATION, INCLUDING INSPECTION REPORTS SHALL BE RETAINED FOR A PERIOD OF THREE (3) YEARS. DESIGN CALCULATIONS ARE ON FILE AT BKBM. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND INSTALLATION INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS, BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN FILED. OWNER: MICHAEL HOAGBERG, MANAGING MEMBER HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT 17550 HEMLOCK AVENUE LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 AGENCY CONTACTS CITY OF CHANHASSEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7700 MARKET BLVD. PO BOX 147 PHONE: (952) 227-1160 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 520 LAFAYE17E ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55155 PHONE: (651) 296-6300 RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 14500 MARTIN DRIVE SUITE 1500 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PHONE: (952) 607-6512 POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES SOLID WASTE DISPOSED PROPERLY; COMPLY WITH (MPCA REQUIREMENTS. HAZARDOUS WASTE STORED (SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, RESTRICTED ACCESS) AND DISPOSED IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS. EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED. NO ENGINE DEGREASING ALLOWED ON -SITE. CONCRETE WASHOUT ON -SITE: ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK -PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER. A COMPACTED CLAY LINER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW LIQUIDS TO ENTER GROUND WATER IS CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY TO INFORM CONCRETE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES. THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA INDICATED ON THE PLANS IS SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION. PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT INCLUDES THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS AND THE PROJECT MANUAL. CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION PHASING NARRATIVE, ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY QUANTITIES OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S ANTICIPATED AT THE START OF THE PROJECT AND FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT, AND LOCATION OF AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE PHASED TO MINIMIZE DURATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS. CONTRACTOR IS TO REVIEW MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE APPLICATION FOR MINNESOTA'S NPDES/SDS GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY PRIOR TO SUBMITTING APPLICATION. INSPECTIONS EXPOSED SOIL AREAS: ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A 1/2 INCH OVER 24 HOURS RAIN EVENT. STABILIZED AREAS: ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS. FROZEN GROUND: AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION. RECORDS: A COPY OF THE GRADING, DRAINAGE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND WATERSHED DATA & SWPPP PLANS AS WELL AS THE INSPECTIONS/MAINTENANCE LOGS ARE TO BE KEPT EITHER IN THE FIELD OFFICE, INSPECTOR'S VEHICLE OR CONTRACTOR'S VEHICLE. HANDLING AND STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: IF THE CONTRACTOR INTENDS TO USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: 1. THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE TREATMENT. CHEMICALS MAY ONLY BE APPLIED WHERE TREATED STORMWATER IS DIRECTED TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM WHICH ALLOWS FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. 2. CHEMICALS MUST BE SELECTED THAT ARE APPROPRIATELY SUITED TO THE TYPES OF SOILS LIKELY TO BE EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND TO THE EXPECTED TURBIDITY, PH AND FLOW RATE OF STORMWATER FLOWING INTO THE CHEMICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM OR AREA. 3. CHEMICALS MUST BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, AND WITH DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER OF THE APPLICABLE CHEMICALS. ON -SITE FUEL TANKS REQUIRE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMIT. PORTABLE FUEL TRUCKS SHALL HAVE THEIR SPILL KITS AVAILABLE DURING FUELING. SPILLS GREATER THAN 5 GALLONS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE PROPER AUTHORITIES. MECHANICAL AND NON STORMWATER DISCHARGES. EXISTING AND PROPOSED 1. WATER LINE FLUSHING 2. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION 3. FOUNDATION DRAINS 4. AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSATION 5. INDIVIDUAL RESIDENT CAR WASHING 6. STREET WASH WATERS 7. RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WASH WATERS WITHOUT DETERGENTS. 0 60' 30' 0 60' 120' SCALE 1W = 60' 1. LONG TERM MAINTENANCE OF THE SITE WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE OWNER. INCLUDED MAINTENANCE FOR STORMWATER DEVISES SHALL BE: 1.1. INSPECT SUMP CATCH BASINS ON A TRIENNIAL BASIS, ONCE IN THE SPRING, SUMMER AND FALL 1.2. CLEAN SUMP CATCH BASINS OF SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS ANNUALLY OR WHEN SEDIMENTS FILL j OF THE STORAGE VOLUME. 1.3. INSPECT FILTRATION BASINS ON A ANNUAL BASIS. 1.4. ENSURE FILTRATION BASINS ARE FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. 2. THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY BKBM ENGINEERS. A COPY OF THEIR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PROGRAM CERTIFICATION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. 3. THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT MUST BE AMENDED AS NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO KEEP IT CURRENT WITH THE POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED AS THE SITE. THE SITE MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS OF ALL STORM WATER CONTROLS MUST BE POSTED ON THE SITE AND UPDATED TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS (INCLUDING STOCKPILES). STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHENEVER ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 7 IF IMPAIRED CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 7 IF IMPAIRED CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. FOR PUBLIC WATER THAT THE DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND DRAIN TO THESE WATERS MUST COMPLETE THE STABILIZATION ACTIVES WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD. PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24-HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE BMP, THE SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS. IF PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL HAS BEEN DAMAGED OR IS NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY, IT MUST BE REPAIRED AND/OR REPLACED WITHIN 24 HOURS. PERIMETER BMP MEASURES MAY INCLUDE SILT FENCING. CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS: ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT ONTO PAVED SURFACES MUST BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY OR MORE FREQUENTLY IF REQUIRED BY CITY OR WATERSHED. CONSTRUCTION SITE DEWATERING: SITE WATER DISCHARGE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING OPERATIONS SHALL BE MONITORED FOR SEDIMENTATION AND TREATED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO PUBLIC STORM SEWERS. TREATMENT OF DEWATERING DISCHARGE MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS OR OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. FINAL STABILIZATION STABILIZATION BY UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER (70% DENSITY) DRAINAGE DITCHES STABILIZED. ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC AND STRUCTURAL BMP'S REMOVED. SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL IS REQUIRED. CLEAN OUT SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS (RETURN TO DESIGN CAPACITY). SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED THROUGH SOIL AMENDMENT AND/OR RIPPING TO A DEPTH OF 18 INCHES WHILE TAKING CARE TO AVOID UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION PRIOR TO FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHER STABILIZATION. GRADING & SOILS BASED ON SOIL BORING PROVIDED BY BRAUN INTERTEC: THE FOLLOWING SOILS ARE ANTICIPATED TO BE ONSITE AT THE DEPTH SPECIFIED BELOW GRADE: TRACE-18 INCHES - TOPSOIL 0-7 FEET - ORGANIC CLAY (ORGANIC DEPOSITS) 0-4 FEET - SANDY LEAN CLAY (FILL) X>7 FEET - SANDY LEAN CLAY & CLAYED SAND (GLACIAL DEPOSITS) REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PORTABLE TOILET NOTES: 1. PORTABLE TOILETS POSE AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD WHEN PLACED IN THE VICINITY OF STORM DRAINS OR BODIES OF WATER. PORTABLE TOILET CLEANING ACTIVITIES CAN ALSO GENERATE POLLUTANTS THAT CAN DEGRADE WATER QUALITY. 2. PORTABLE TOILET PLACEMENT: 2.1. PLACE PORTABLE TOILETS ON FLAT STABLE GROUND WITH CLEAR ACCESS TO THE UNITS. 2.2. LOCATE TOILETS A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET FROM ANY WATER BODY AND 10 FEET FROM ANY CURB AND GUTTER. IF UNFEASIBLE, AN EARTHERN BERM OR SAND BAG BERM SHALL BE PLACED AROUND THE UNIT FOR SPILL AND LEAK CONTAINMENT. 2.3. AVOID PLACING TOILETS ON IMPERVIOUS SURFACES THAT WILL QUICKLY DRAIN TO STORM SEWERS. 2.4. LOCATE TOILETS SO THAT EXPOSURE TO TRAFFIC AND MOVING EQUIPMENT IS MINIMIZED. 2.5. SECURE TOILETS TO THE GROUND WITH STAKES OR CABLES. 2.6. RINSE WATER FROM CLEANING ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT BE DISPOSED ON SITE. 3. REGULARLY CHECK TOILETS FOR DAMAGE, LEAKS AND SPILLS AS PART OF THE WEEKLY STORMWATER SITE INSPECTION. 4. OWNER IDENTIFICATION AND CONTACT INFORMATION SHALL BE DISPLAYED IN A PROMINENT LOCATION ON EACH UNIT. 'U z F U F-I U W rA W A W a V Z o m Q N w O Lu w 0 Z rn � z w O U Cr)F_ a� 0 0 �LLI 04 04 y `I) Ov v� 0 Lu 0 0 C14o = p = X o I� o o ag IIIQIIII�II I >40 1 a N 2-4 g. �y Un DO 3Z O�cO pj Ea° rA �W m nci� '€$ � W �C7 �.onoro� DO caa) a 0 W Z wca O C c: m e G LL m O 44 �3 FwR' m p � z w N 0 w V)0 - d a O :D00 3): (D FIE �OQwg K J = 0 p :2 :Dw �Z�ood W o Ob w Z UJ z O Q K r T w Z O U Q x w www�(D t= I- V1 � H W O Y p E f- C/7 LLJ Q LLJ �0 C) L1J Z 5Z c ` Z LLI Q U0 Q r O = r Z U STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PROJECT NO: 2000.01 DRAWN BY: NPA CHECKED BY: KAM NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP C500 LEGEND: STANDARD CONCRETE COLORED CONCRETE ® BITUMINOUS ASPHALT PLANT BED W/HARDWOOD MULCH SYNTHETIC TURF �II NATURAL TURF - SEED NATURAL TURF - SOD I SHORT GRASS PRAIRIE I BIOFILTRATION BASIN PLUGS BIOFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX 4-6" FIELDSTONE ROCK MULCH ////' + OVERSTORY TREE 0 ORNAMENTALTREE Iok'6 • € EVERGREEN TREE 1114%v: LAYOUT NOTES: 1. ALL CURBS RAMPS TO BE BUILT AS PER FEDERAL AND LOCAL ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.. 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA CODES AND STANDARDS. NOTHING INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS SHALL RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLYING WITH ANY APPROPRIATE SAFETY REGULATIONS. 3. VERIFY COORDINATES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY AND INSTALL ALL NECESSARY SLEEVES UNDER PAVING AND WALKS. 5. PROPOSED SIGNAGE TO MEET CITY CODES FOR GROUND SIGNS, n � m Q Lo 0 Ln w H w 0 a 0 w Z Z_ � Ln Z'o 'o V � P Z � P wo4ZC`o,� 0 04 d N ooLLJ0o• o' ci��=X W p �0_ U U w_pLLaU C R U�r2 -- N W om0 �y zUaO� tea% �pU~pK� J N>0w,� i w.=z wwo o �,,„Noo LL 'QFQooQ? wF¢�wN-z�riFpy-iQF�ppoazwz®¢nzozO<zzaQoo- wm im�� U Qi�rcoCfU a_= z O X U LL J W Q LLJ a�O (J) Lu Z _Z 0 N Cn � Q O = TZ 1 =v SITE PLAN PROJECT NO: 17164 DRAWN BY: EN CHECKED BY: TM 101 ITE PLAN SCALE:1"=40' 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' L100 e u a n L 1 ,I A rill a� '1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I AA V j -!-' i 1 , e: j I/p}r � 1 1 KEYNOTES: AO STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER, SEE DETAIL 07/1501 OB 4' ECHELON PLUS FENCE & GATE, SEE DETAIL 11-12/1-500 CO MEMORY CARE FENCE & GATE, SEE DETAIL 13/1-500 OD PLAYGROUND, BY FLAGSHIP RECREATION OE SYNTHETIC TURF AS FALL SURFACE, SEE DETAIL 03/1-500 OF SYNTHETIC TURF AS PUTTING GREEN, SEE DETAIL 01/1-500 OG GRILL STATION, SEE DETAIL 04-05/1-500 OH PERGOLA A & B, SEE DETAIL 06-10/1-500 OMOVABLE SITE FURNITURE, BY OTHERS LEGEND: STANDARD CONCRETE COLORED CONCRETE ® BITUMINOUS ASPHALT PLANT BED W/ HARDWOOD MULCH SYNTHETIC TURF NATURAL TURF -SEED NATURALTURF-SOD SHORT GRASS PRAIRIE BIOFILTRATION BASIN PLUGS BIOFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX 4-6" FIELDSTONE ROCK MULCH + OVERSTORY TREE OORNAMENTALTREE 1" �`*'y 4 EVERGREEN TREE 911e � 3 cat d c `w ooa u�Q ga c m E m N 0 da�w i 2 E � W� V AU.wO= or OWmo C d wo�� NZ-+mOm W iopyFm i a�m°'ozi W4'WIm-W SOU �O�j J w>pmwLL O H y y W O O LLU �mWU m WOLLd'=21�. C o==o ry (WWWOON O®s50D" m i-rq w00 a U ioiz=maz' 0 �-mwswm YKZ_K0 u�ao�-o o�mz:LL�� Uaaaa? a �I V I N W 1 L1J LLJ ce O Z z ~Cz_ O 0 7 L11 U-) r n V I Q O Z = U REFERENCE PLAN PROJECT NO: 17164 DRAWN BY: EN CHECKED BY: TM EFERENCE PLAN SCALEA "=20' o' S' 10' 20' 40' L400 I 1 1 1 2? z y 0 y _ g 0 z 0 0 LL I I I I i / 3 + 1 t i e r + /�ULTILINE O LEGEND: STANDARD CONCRETE COLORED CONCRETE _ BITUMINOUS ASPHALT SYNTHETIC TURF NATURALTURF-SEED NATURAL TURF - SOD 0 SHORT GRASS PRAIRIE 5 BIOFILTRATION BASIN PLUGS L BIOFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX 4-6" FIELDSTONE ROCK MULCH + OVERSTORY TREE OORNAMENTAL TREE 9 • E EVERGREEN TREE # TREE CALLOUT XX XX SHRUB/PERENNIAL CALLOUT W U w oO o o> WOW 6 U C NLLwp�� W Z O 00 p y F a�w ZQ>mNO22 w,/ SOU ORS J2NK00 2 �NjNWU LLnw00O2LL U 00 C n oFWwOw O ®2JZo2Z i F�10000 �a==wawm U >, Exxrr a w<z,og 0 0 a< a E 0 W N N p F-- LLJ w � LEI o ci w Z 0 O w V! Q ' ^ V J O � = Z = V LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT NO: 17164 DRAWN BY: EN CHECKED BY: TM L401 lei 14 RG 19 RG 5 SS 26 CO Y W W v W V W J W y W W y y W W w W W w W W w w w W W W L V W w W W Y W w w a W 3s v 4 Y Y W +L w w w 4 W W w w W V W W W w W v y W W W W Y W W W W W Y W W y W W w v W W W W W W W W w •Y W r w W w w W v W W W W w m W y v W W W W 3 w w w W W w W W w W W W W W W W w V. •YivF/ V w W W v�y W w W W W W W W w w W W W W L I. N..............w........... w W •i W W v W W W W W W W W \W W W W W W W v W W W W rl' W W W w i W W t7 „rW W W W W w W w W W W I W W W y v W m y! W W W W W W W W m W W Y W m W W W W W i W W +b W W W W w w wf W w W W W y W W W W y 'I' W W W W W W W W w W W W W W W W W W W W W f+ W W W W W W w W W W W W w w W W b W W W W W W W W W W W w W W W Q W A� \\\�I fi��l �y ! 1 Wi W W m W i w W W W W W _ W `\ :.:. • w! W W W W W W W W w *L w a l 35PH - W 1- 94 a �/ �� '� 1l) W W W / \ "7• \ !! J 4 :tip W W W W W W m W W W W W EC -._�.� _ CA ✓ W L W W W J+\ '� W W W ( Q W W W W W W W W W W W 58 Q Q 5 J- W W W •V W W w W L w W W _..... Q •• 4- W b v W W WW' '.b W W w ~\ v_ MN. RC y W W W w W W W W W W W W W W//W W W WW W W W J W J+ W W W W W W W W W W W \ �I �+ �'•:' p tt I i V y L? 20 W w W m W W W W W a W N W W W W W W W W m W Q \ W W � W W W t-�-/ / .� W /IW/ �I��\ 'i� W W W W W G j V v v'v HM I W W WI l \W W W W �` /�j. 33 W S W W W y W W m w W W W W I o l W W W WY...,..' S'' W -•l `� W W W W ! ` y W w W W W W W W W W W l\ W W W W W W W W W w W W W W W LS �'�-_� 1 � CJ C-i � W l y W W W W W W W W W w W ,\ W W W .N w W w +: Vr W y W W W w' W W W W W W W W J% ' jY ! y W W b W W w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w v v W w W W W 13 4 Q vn / W W W W W b W W W W W y W W w W W W W f W W W W W W W W w W y � I� © � \ DE W W V• W W W W W W W W W W i W W W W y W i W W W W W W W W W W W W' © V l/ Q{ ©W W W W W W W W W W W W W W QRO iW N• W W W W W W N W W W W W w W W W W w W W �} [' �y IfW W W W W W W W W W W {' .9'„•,- V V \7 13 W W I W W W W W W W W W W W �� ( W I W W `Y W W W W W W W W W y W W W W W W Y-„Y✓ ,,,..�(^^ 1 'may -„� W W W W W W W W W W W w W W. W W i w W w W i i" �-- 1 ; "~. I +..,M1 W W W W y D E \\may \W W +WkW W WW W WW b WW W WW W W W W W W W W W W WW W Ww W Ww W m lW f I b I �� f /f ^.. •`+..,.,.W \'✓4 \ W W W w W W 1V Y \. V TV '7V W W—W \V 17 7 W WW W WW W WW w wW W WW W WW W WW W WW W W m W W W W ,/ y � � � ' / ... �,y,^.u,.� -W w a \\ V'...� i/ b ,y W W W WI(W W W W W.,F••• W m W W W W I W W w W W W W w W W w W w� .! ✓ `�. W W W w '-fWes. j ~' y _ W W W W W W Jr W W W W W W W W W W w 111 •�4, W W W W v / , .. `'-a'4-W \,\ -. _.-. - W W W W W W W Ii w W m W W W W W W W W j) x X — a +- } -}- -I { - - {- { w` 0 __..... .. __.__� _ _ 0 0 N F 0 h z c 0 LL 0 1 ANDSCAPE PLAN -SOUTH ENLARGEMENT SCALE:1"=10' 0'25' 5' 10' 20' LEGEND: STANDARD CONCRETE COLORED CONCRETE _ BITUMINOUS ASPHALT SYNTHETIC TURF NATURALTURF-SEED NATURAL TURF - SOD SHORT GRASS PRAIRIE BIOFILTRATION BASIN PLUGS BIOFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX 4-6" FIELDSTONE ROCK MULCH + OVERSTORY TREE OORNAMENTAL TREE s EVERGREEN TREE # TREE CALLOUT X�{X if XX SHRUB/PERENNIAL CALLOUT 'U z ou r� (vFI\ V W N �xy rvN�^,i W z cmW yia C4 W 44 Vl U Z Lo G N W H a uj O d Z 0 's'o V I-Z J Q a Off. Z (D v7 (D p� � w c0u Z ? a � 04 OalJ w Cl Ln 0WO01 P 0 wcn0D m-L,) N U@00.= o> 0 W p C � R �_U• y WWJF SON W 2 iU�hrW Z 9 m% O 2 2 Q W y' W� y W ml w.J wLL O��ywp0 UU JtgWU p Z w 0 W C p >,oz O W W p F p W wU U O ®5 J Z O 2 � w�wp000 x,z� Z ��==w�wm V >LL'ZNK 0�a> gkg0 �a¢S5a ¢ I— W I _I L LI L1J O c~n w z z \0 0� z_ O zw Cl� Q C10 o z = V LANDSCAPE PLAN - SOUTH ENLARGEMENT PROJECT NO: 17164 DRAWN BY: EN CHECKED BY: TM L402 0 8' O.C. Nom. - Varies with Height Varies with Height Standard Heights 3', 3%', 4', 5', 6' 21" Min. 2" Nom. J rrrr 31%6"TYPICAL Footing depth I.�• NOTES: 2x RAILS TO BE FASTENED TO POSTS WITH POCKET SCREWS (CONCEALED BY VERTICAL PICKETS). POSTS SHALL BE SET IN A 4'-0" (MIN) DEPTH CONCRETE FOOTING FENCE TO BE PRIMED AND PAINTED, COLOR AND FINISH TBD. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED ELEVATION HEAVY DUTY HOOK SCREW AND STRAP HINGE 5/4 x 6 PICKETS w/ 1/2" GAP SPACING 2 x 6 BRACE, BACK OF FENCE —� 2 x 4 RAIL, FRONT OF FENCE 2 x 4 RAIL, BACK OF ENCE O.C. T-6" MIN EQUAL O.C. 2'-6" 2X4 RAIL THUMB LEVER LATCH FOR TWO-SIDED ACCESS EQUAL O.C. 8'-0" MAXIMUM SEC A 6 x 6 POST w/ POST CAP (COLOR/MATERIAL TBD) 2x6 TOP CAP RAIL L 2x6RAIL I 2x6RAIL PICKETS w/ 1/2" GAP - =- SPACING �— 2x6 BOTTOM CAP RAIL CROSS HALVING JOINTS @ PICKET INTERSECTIONS 16'-0" DIA�� 2x6RAIL 2X2 RAIL !x6RAIL 5/4 x 6 PICKETS w/ 1/2" GAP SPACING 2X2 RAIL ON A - CONCRETE FOOTING 13 L500 MEMORY GARDEN FENCE N.T.S f Iy"x 1%6"FORERUNNER"Rail (See Cross- Section Below) Post size varies with Height /(See ECHELON Plus" Post -Sizing chart) O L500 4' ECHELON PLUS FENCE N.T.S LAG SCREW CONNECTION, EMBED 2" INTO BEAM BELOW 1 -0 O.C. 1 -0 O.C. cno Dr-rstvt Ilk 2X2 SLAT IC// 2X2 ANGLE W/LAG BOLT N CONNECTIONS co tt �i N -v I 2X6 BEAM 2X6 BEAM 1X4 WRAPPED TRIM 1X4 WRAPPED TRIM 1X8 WRAPPED TRIM 1X8 WRAPPED TRIM 1X WRAPPED COLUMN SURROUND 1X WRAPPED COLUMN SURROUND 6X6 POST 6X6 POST 06 L500 PERGOLA CONNECTION DETAIL NT.S L500 PERGOLA CONNECTION DETAIL NOTE: INSTALL ARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS AND INFILL NOTE: MATERIAL PER MANUFACTURERS INSTALL ARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS AND INFILL RECOMMENDATIONS. MATERIAL PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. MANUFACTURER: FOREVERLAWN MINNESOTA TROY JOHNSON P: 612 2101946 trov((Dmn.foreverlawn.com ARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS, AS SPECIFIED. INFILL MATERIAL. 3/8" COMPACTED GRAVELBASE NAIL OR STAPLE �d ARTIFICIAL TURF TO M BOARD FASTEN BOARD WITH i SS SCREWS PRESSURE TREATED 2X4, TRIM TO FIT AS NECESSARY CONCRETE WALK GEOTEXTILE / FABRIC UNDISTURBED GRADE X�\\� NOTE: SEE DETAIL 02/LS501 FOR POSSIBLE FINISH NOTES. Y4" O x .045" Picket Bracket Options NOTE: INSTALL FENCE PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. MODEL: ECHELON PLUS STYLE: MAJESTIC, HEIGHTS VARY- SEE LAYOUT PLAN, 3 RAIL, BLACK. MANUFACTURER: AMERISTAR FENCE W: AMERISTARFENCE.COM P: 1.888.333.3422 3" (Latch Clearance) Ameristar Standard 23/" (Hinge Clearance) Leaf Widths 5„ �� 1%" x 1%'"' 6"FORERUNNERRail T (See Cross- Section on Panel Drawing) Varies I1 Post size varies with Height with (See ECHELON PLUS'"'Post-Sizing chart) Height 1 Varies ® Gate Upright with 1%" x .125 wall Height tat Jail i ht Y2, 6, a"W x .080 wall Picket Weld on Box Hinge 2" (Requires steel posts) Nom. 21"Min. 1 315/6' TYPICAL I Footing depth U` Li Single gate Arrangement 12 L500 4' ECHELON PLUS GATE N.T.S NOTE: SEE DETAIL 02/LS501 FOR POSSIBLE FINISH NOTES. `2 SLAT 3 BEAM L01 PUTTING GREEN TURF N.T.S. ARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS INFILL MATERIAL 3/8" COMPACTED GRAVEL BASE PLANT BED MATERIAL k ' NAIL OR STAPLE 16 ' q'�,il; ARTIFICIAL TURF TO BOARD i #51 }klt I 1 It I`It" v 1 METAL EDGER STAKE, PER SPEC. PRESSURE TREATED 2X4, TRIM TO FIT AS NECESSARY r PLANTING SOIL 24" STAKE UNDISTURBED GRADE 02 L500 PUTTING GREEN TURF a0 PLANT BED NOTE: SEE DETAIL 02 FOR POSSIBLE FINISH NOTES. 1X WRAPPED COLUMN SURROUND 1X 8 WRAPPED TRIM GALVINIZED CARRIAGE BOLTS CAULK BETWEEN (2 PER CONNECTION) TRIM FOR WATERTIGHT SEAL SEE PLAN FOR CONCRETE SURFACE TYPE CONSTRUCTION JOINT 1X 4 WRAPPED TRIM d 7 d a d 6 x 6 POST BASE a 18" SIMPSON STRONGTIE a CONCRETE FOOTING 5'-0" MIN, I r1l; VERIFY WITH STRUCTURAL d d ENGINEER. Q.. t d v 08 PERGOLA COLUMN DETAIL N.T.S L500 ARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS, — AS SPECIFIED. INFILL MATERIAL. NAILER BOARD, MOUNTED " BELOW( SURFACE AND SECURED WITH d CONCRETE FASTENERS CONCRETE EDGE NOTE: INSTALL ARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS AND INFILL MATERIAL PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. MANUFACTURER:FOREVERLAWN MINNESOTA TROY JOHNSON P: 612 210 1946 trovCci mn.foreverlawn.com 2.25" SAFETY FOAM COMPACTED 141 AGUKEGATE SUBBASE }}\t\�JrJ!"� / SUBGRADE 03 N.T.S. L500 I SYNTHETIC PLAY TURF 2 x 2 SOLID BEAM 2 x 8 SOLID BEAM 2 x 6 BEAM 6X6 TREATED POST - WRAP b COLUMN WITH WHITE CEMENT BOARD OR ° ENGINEERED PLASTIC - 1 BOARD I X/ VARIES, SEE PLAN 09 PERGOLA, FRONT VIEW N.T S L500 04 N.T.S. I I L500 I GRILL STATION j 4 06 L500 It e I rli^ 08 L500 N.T,S PERGOLA FINISH NOTES: • ALL BOLTED CONNECTIONS TO BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED • STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS AND FINISH NAILS TO BE USED PERGOLA FINISH OPTIONS: COLOR: WHITE OPTION 1: SMOOTH ENGINEERED PLASTIC OPTION 2: SANDED, PRIMED, AND PAINTED CEDAR VARIES, SEE PLAN 11 Ilk 1 L500 PERGOLA, SIDE VIEW N.T.S '-BBER St:-' F-IN GAS WEER FA ITERTOP LFRAME RUCTION MATCH 'ECTURE 05N.T.S L500 GRILL STATION SECTION N.T.S 'U H I V] U W E-4 x U �i �i W z Ca � U IUD m N Lnn V O 'n w F = w O Q n O LU ^N Q Z �LU ZN:�E MV04 LU O O 01Z w O �Cn � (D�� d� LU 0o Z_ CT 0, w �c ���N OUN oow8o•` 04�o=X O W° 0._ V O w O LL a c~i � C h LL i' 5 y o.0W0 Wt7�rn � zamr Nzi J N K Q Q Z Z O yyWOO IL U wy WU u m°OZ,y C a�oLLo 0In7 w O ' W0000 FUw Uxryz�zrttozz xzzazr —¢rckx O NZZ° rc UQQQ6? u ;ti A C., or U_ !4 v V o u.< .?8 €� N A C E 8 d �a TN a vo'N E— w J wQ O Cn w Z Z ~O O OD ` Z w (J) n Q Z =v SITE DETAILS PROJECT NO: 17164 DRAWN BY: EN CHECKED BY: TM L500 0 Deciduous Tree Planting Schedule Symbol Quantity Scientific Name Common Name Size Cont. Type AF 6 Acerx freemanii'Jefferred' Autumn Blaze Maple 2" B&B Single Stem BS 6 Betula nigra 'Shiloh Splash' Shiloh Splash Birch #10 Cont. Single Stem BIN 10 Betula nigra River Birch 3" Cont. Single Stem BP 4 Betula populifolia Whitespire' Whitespire Birch 2" B&B Single Stem Cl 2 Crataegus crus-galli var. inermis Thomless Hawthorn 2" B&B Single Stem GT 7 Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skycole' Skyline Honeylocust 2" 1B&B Single Stem KC 5 Gymnocladus dioicus 'Espresso' Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree 2" B&B Single Stem MA 2 Malus 'Prairiefire' Prairiefire Crabapple 1.5" B&B Single Stem OV 3 Ostrya viginiana Ironwood 2" B&B Single Stem QB 13 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2" B&B Single Stem TM 4 Tilia mongolica 'Harvest Gold' (PP12,232) Harvest Gold Linden 2" B&B Single Stem 56 Tree Total Evergreen Tree Planting Schedule Symbol Quantity Scientific Name Common Name Size ICont. Type AB 4 Abies frasen Fraser Fir 6' 1B&B Single Stem PA 5 Picea abies Norway Spurce 6' B&B Single Stem PC 5 Pinus cembra Swiss Stone Pine 6' B&B Single Stem FIN2 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 8' B&B Single Stem PR 3 lioinus resinosa Norway Pine 8' B&B Single Stem 19 ITree Total Deciduous Shrub Planting Schedule Symbol Quantity Scientific Name Common Name Size Type Spacing DL 51 Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 24" HEIGHT #5 Cont. 4' O.0 HY 31 Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle' Annabelle Hydrangea 36" HEIGHT #5 Cont. 4' O.0 RA 10 Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Lora/ Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 24" HEIGHT #5 Cont. 4' O.C. RO 298 Rosa 'Chewper Adventure' Oso Easy Mango Salsa Shrub Rose 18" HIEGHT #2 Cont. 2.5' O.C. 390 Shrub Total Evergreen Shrub Planting Schedule Symbol Quantity Scientific Name Common Name Size Type Spacing AP 1 JAbies balsamea 'Piccolo' Balsam Dwarf Piccolo 36" HEIGHT #5 Cont. 3' O.C. TC 12 Tsuga canadensis Aurea Compacta' Canadian Compact Hemlock 48" HEIGHT #7 Cont. 6' O.C. 1 IShrub Total Perennial Planting Schedule Symbol Quantity Scientific Name Common Name Size Type yp Spacing p g AC 10g Alchern0a Gold Strike' Lady's Mantle 1 Gal. Pot 2' O.C. AR 8 Artemisia schmidtiana 'Silver Mound' Silver Mound Artemisia 1 Gal. Pot 1. 5' O.C. CA 112 Calamagrostis x. acutiflora Karl Foerster Grass 1 Gal. Pot 30" O.C. CO 26 Coreopsis 'Creme Brule' (PP16,096) Creme Brule Coreopsis 1 Gal. Pot 1. 5' O.C. DE 178 Deschampsia cespitpsa 'Pixie Fountain' Pixie fountain Deschampsia 1 Gal. Pot 1. 5' O.C. EC 108 Echinachea purpurea 'Rainbow Marcella' Rainbow Marcella Coneflower 1 Gal. Pot 1. 5' O.C. HM 122 Hemocallis 'Mighty Chestnut' Daylily 1 Gal. Pot 2' O.C. HD 64 Hosta 'Dream Weaver' Dream Weaver Hosta 1 Gal. Pot 30" O.C. LS 62 Liatris spicata'Floristan Violet' Floristan Violet Liatris 1 Gal. Pot 181, O.C. MN 185 Salvia x sylvestris 'May Night' May Night Sage 1 Gal. Pot 18" O.C. PE 106 Perovskia atriplicifolia 'Rocketman' Rocketman Russian Sage 1 Gal. Pot 30" O.C. PH 50 nnis m I ec roides 'Hameln' Pe etu a o uGrass P Hameln Fountain 1 Gal. Pot 2' O.C. PV 40 Panicum virgatum 'Shenandoah' Switch Grass 1 Gal. Pot T O.C. RG 111 Rudbeckia 'Goldsturm' Black Eye Susan 1 Gal. Pot 18" O.C. SS 5 Schizachyrium scoparium Little Bluestein 1 Gal. Pot 2' O.C. SH 219 Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed 11 Gal. 1Pot 2' O.C. 1505 JPerennial Total 08 PLANTING SCHEDULES L501 SOD SOIL FROM SOD CUTTING F / / ' TOPSOIL DISCED SUBGRADE ni / r SUBGRADE 01 L501 SOD PLANTING N.T.S. VEGETATION - SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN RODENT TRUNK PROTECTION:" HARDWIRE -CLOTH MESH CYLINDER. DIMENSIONS: 8" DIAMETER (OR GREATER) X 36' HEIGHT, STAKE IN PLACE, AVOIDING ROOTS. SEE SPEC. 3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH ROOT FLARE. 4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL. EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEE PLAN. COMPACT PLANTING SOIL TO 85% OF MAXIMUM DRY UNIT WEIGHT PER ASTM D 698. Biofiltration Basin Plug Planting Schedule Symbol Quantity Scientific Name Common Name Size Type Spacing Notes: Biofiltration basin planting area to receive Anti -Wash/ GEOJute Erosion Control Blanket prior to plug planting. Install per manufacturers recommendations STM 534 Infiltration Basin Plug Mixture 5' O.C. 67 12.5% Calamagrostis canadensis Blue Joint Grass W Plug Group 67 12.5% Eupatorium maculatum Joe Pye Weed 3" Plug Group 67 12.5% Panicum virigatum Switch Grass 3" Plug Group 67 12.5% Rudebeckia hirta Black -Eyed Susan 3" Plug Group 67 12.5% Rudebeckia lanciniata Cutleaf Coneflower 3" Plug Group 67 12.5% Solidago rigida Stiff Goldenrod 3" Plug Group 67 12.5% Verbena hastata Blue Vervain W Plug Group 67 12.5°/q Zizea aurea Golden Alexanders 3" Plug Group 1 lPerennial Total 11 L501 BIOFILTRATION BASIN PLUGS N ITS Height: Mature plants range from 1 to 4 feet tall. ------ Seeding Pate: 10lb/acre (48.5 Seeds/fta) _....__r__..__ .._ COMMON NAME %of Mix i Seadrift R"EAcre ,..,GRASSES: Boutelouacurtipenduis (Sidacatsoante 3s 00%. Boutelouagracilis Blue Grama 1.00%'.. Bromus kdmii Prairie Brome 12.Wu7b Schizachyrium scope rium Little Bluestem 30.00% Sporobolusaspera Rough Dropseed 200% '... FORBS: Alliumcernuum NoddingOnion 0.80%. Asclepiastuberosa Butterfly Milkweed 0.40% Aster azureus Sky Blue Aster Astragaluscamadends Canada MilkVetch 1.2QI%1 m� Baptisia albs White Wild Indigo 1.20%I Caana scrista fesciculam . Partridge Pea 3.80% Coreapsisl.laaoFata Isendcoreopds OA0% Daleacandidurn White Prairie Cloister 2At11% Daleapurpurea Purple Prairie Clover ZA096 Eryngium yuccifolium Rattlesnake Master 1.0r Gentianaflavida 1creantdmHai Cam Monardafistuloss Weld Bergamot OA 6 Lacge-flowered Penstemongratddiflorus Beardtongue Potentillaarguta Prairie Cinquefoil 82" Rudbeckiahirta .__. ...._..._ . Slack-eyedSu.sain 1.201rr'. Solidagerigida ,Stiff Goldenrod 0.40%, Tradescantiaohiensis Ohio Spiderwort 100% Verbenastricta .Hoary Vervain !00% Ziziaaptera HeaKleafAlexandors 1.20%'.. 09 SHORT SEED MIXTURE N.TS. L501 7.71 $ 51PLSIb 1.5; 0.1,PLS1b 3.5 1.2 PLSIb 6.5Y 3 PLSIb 2.2i 0.2 PLSIb 0.2 0.08 PLSIb 0.1, 0.08 PLSIb 1.8 0.06 PLSIb 0.7 0.12 PLSIb 0A 0.12 PLSIb 0.4 0.367PL51b _..._..._._, ._....__.___-1 0.3 0.04', PLSIIb 1.4 0.2 PLSIb 1.3 0.24PLS1b 0.3 0.1 PLSIb 1 0.02'... PLSIb 1 0.04 PLSIb j 0.2 0.04. PLSIb 1.7 0.02 PLSIb 44 0.12 PLSIb 0.6 0.04 PLS lb 0.3 0.1 PLSIb 1 O.i PLSIb � 0,5 0.12 PLSIb I NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING AND GUYING IS MANDATORY FOR TREES 4" CAL OR GREATER, AND ALL BARE ROOT TREES. WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 32 93 00, EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT 30rI FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE, THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THE FIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT (#' DIA. OR LARGER) EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAIN ORDER ROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE. DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. 5' DIAMETER MULCH RING, TYP. Landscape Requirements - City of Chanhassen Sec. Requirement Factor Min Req. Proposed Landscape Landscaping shall be provided 20-1179. Budget that meets the minimum $28,000,000 $280,000 landscaping budget per project value Vehicular For 100sgftvehiculararea,8sgft 20-1181. Areas of landscaped area shall be 30,890 2471.2 6728.37 provided Trees in ltree required for each 250sq ft Parking Lot 1 of required landscaped area 10 14 12 L501 CITY REQUIREMENTS N.T s ®r SHOOTING STAR NATIVE SEEDS 20740 County Road'33 • Spdng Grove, MN 55874 (M7) 499-3944 Phme -(507) 49B-3953 Fax,. www.sms.co Description 33-261 Storinwater South& West Mix Seeding Rate 35 LbsJAcre (178.7 soeds(Square Foot) Notes: Stomiwater pond edges, temporarily aooded dryponds, and tempomnlyagoded ditch bottoms. Common Nam* Sai r io Name % of Mix Seeds/Ft Rats/Aam Grieves Slender Whestgrass Agropyron trwhycaulum 2.86% 25 1.00 PLS Lbs Big Bluestein Andopogw gerardii 5.71% 73 2:00 PLS Los Fringed Brame Bromus.hiatus 5.71% 73 2.00 PLS Los Blue Joint Grass Calamagrostis canadensis 0. 17R6 6.2 0.06 PLS Lbs VlrVinia Wild Rye Etymus vlrgintws 4,29% 23 1.50 PLS Los s4tohgrass Panicum virgatum 1.09% 2.0 0,38 PLS Los Fac, Bluegrass Poe palusbis 3.03% 506 1.06 PLS Los Indian"" Scrghastrum Tulare 0,34% Q5 0,12 PLS Los Prairie Cord Greas Spartira pectinata 1:09% 0.9 D:38 PLS Lbs Sedges a Rushes Fox Sedge Carex stipata 0.71% 3A 0,25 PLS Lbs Green Bulrush Sgrpus atrovirens 0.54% 321 0.19 PLS Lbs Waolgrass Sarpusoypenrus 0,17% 375 0.06 Pts Lbs Forbe Canada Anemone Anemone canadensis B20% G2 0,07 PLS Lbs Swamp Milkweed Ascapias incamata 0.31% 6..2 0.11 PLS Los New England Aster Aster novae-angliae 0.20% 17 '.107 PLS Lbs Flat-topped Aster Asterumbellaas 0,17% 15 0.06 PLS Los Beggars Ilok Bidensfrondosa 0,31% 012 O. 11 PLS Lbs Joe Pye Weed Eupatonummaculatum 0,17% 2A 0:D6 PLS Lbs Sneezeweed. Helem. autumnal. 0,37% 6.2 013 PLS Lbs Obedient Plant Physostegia virginiana Q20% 0-3 0:07 PLS Lbs. Wild Golden Glow Rudbackia laciniata 012M 0.4 :0.07 PLS Lbs Blue Vervain Verbena hastata 0.14% 1.7 0.05 PLS Lbs Golden Nexanders Zimaaurea 0.57% 08 :020 PLS Lbs Cover Crop Oats Avena saliva 71,43%. 1110 25,00 PLS Los Request a. pdce W otetar in6 mu by cantacin9.Infq@asns,m or (507)49a-3944. Substitutions may be necessary based on evailebatyat the time of order. 10 BIOINFILTRATION MIXTURE N.T.S. L501 IV !!! A/ /// j6//S i /,;�`f f / r a' HOLD LAWN/PLANTING ANTING ___ L/% // % !i / !i / =y ✓i// /is // SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITH ✓,+., CONDITION 1"BELOW ///y / JF / / ! O k FINISHED PAVERS �-----� � i/�j /j%fy /!/ jr/j /� s// � SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH Ft _ I �- !/j�!//i ! /i//iys / Il y// jiB/i�/j :" PREPARED SOIL. CONCRETE PAVEMENT -- _mm REMOVE BURLAP, WINE, ROPE -( 1j/!�//yi✓� f�/ /i I %!/!f /i!/ // // AND WIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL 6' COMPACTED CLASS 5 _ %/!i%.✓ % �j/ �. e' ' / j'/ `� / ' -'- j AGGREGATE SUBBASE - j%! / /j.,,``` / ! i v //r PLANTING PIT TO BE TWO TO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETER OF ROOT BALL, SLOPED UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE. _ UNDISTURBED SOIL r %x --- I TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE DIG PLANTING PIT 4-6" DEEPER THAN m FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT 12" PLANTING SOIL s ROOTBALL. ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. z'� � DRAINAGE TRENCH AS REQUIRED PER 5, PERCOLATION TEST IN SPEC. AUGER A 4" PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED OR DIA. HOLE & FILL W/ J" GRAVEL. COMPACTED SOIL. L5002 1 PLANT BED @ CONICWALK N.T.S. L5003 1 TREE PLANTING, TYP. N.T.S. NOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING. - CONCRETE WALK MAY OCCUR 5" DEEP MULCH POCKET TOP OF MULCH IS TO BELOW TOP OF WALKICURB EXTENDING A MIN. OF T-6" FROM EDGE OF SET TOP OF ROOT CROWN 1" ABOVE WALK/CURB. FINISHED GRADE. MOUND PLANTING ORGANIC MULCH, BED SOIL SLIGHTLY TO TO TOP OF AS SPECIFIED, ROOT CROWN. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF MINIMIZE CONTACT ENTIRE BED WITH SPACE BY HAND W/ PLANT STEM(S) TO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL. 1'- 6" STEEL EDGING, Fr 7� Z AS SPECIFIED rialkilk, ilia Ytitl9ttlgil CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL HAVE ROOTS HAVE LOOSENED. L501 I PLANTING BED, TYP PLANTING SOIL PREPARE SOIL FOR TLJC CNITIDC Di=n 04 I SHRUB PLANTING, TYP L501 UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE. NOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING. 3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB STEM. CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED. II11.4" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL. CARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIRE ED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH LANTING SOIL. -NDISTURBED SUBGRADE. N.T.S. PLANTING NOTES 1. NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 2. PRE -EMERGENT HERBICIDE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANTING BEDS IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF MULCH, FOR WEED CONTROL. 3, NO EXCAVATION OR PLANTING PIT SHALL BE LEFT OPEN OVERNIGHT. 4. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT, ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO 'V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE PAVED SURFACE. 5. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REFUSE ANY PLANT MATERIAL OR ANY DEFECTIVE WORKMANSHIP. 6, MEASUREMENT OF CONIFER HEIGHT SHALL INCLUDE NOT MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT (50%) OF THIS YEARS VERTICAL GROWTH (TOP CANDLE). 7. PLANT SYMBOLS ON PLAN DRAWING TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. 8. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE STAKING OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO DIGGING. 9. SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL ONLY BE ALLOWED WHEN THE CONTRACTOR HAS EXHAUSTED ALL SOURCES FOR THE SPECIFIED MATERIAL, AND HAS PROVEN THAT THE SPECIFIED MATERIAL IS NOT AVAILABLE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE NAME AND VARIETY OF SUBSTITUTION TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO TAGGING OR PLANTING. SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE NEAREST EQUIVALENT SIZE OF VARIETY OF PLANT HAVING SAME ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS. 10. PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. 11. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL, OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS OR MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 10-0-5 OF 12 OZ. PER 2.5" CALIPER TREE AND 6 OZ. PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10-0-10 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. 12. PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS SCREENED COMPOST AND 10 PARTS SAND OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 13. TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE TWO -WALLED PLASTIC SHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUNK FLARE TO FIRST BRANCH. WRAP SMOOTH -BARKED DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1 AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1. 14. 3/16" THICK STEEL OR ALUMINUM EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS AND ANNUALS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS SOD - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. 16. SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. 17. CONIFEROUS TREES ARE TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AND SHALL HAVE NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE TREE TRUNK. 18. ALL DECIDUOUS, PINE AND LARCH TREE PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE RODENT PROTECTION PER MNDOT 2571.31.2. DO NOT PROVIDE ON SPRUCE TREES. 19. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. 20. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15, 21. CONIFEROUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO OCTOBER 1. FALL DECIDUOUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 22. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THAT EACH EXCAVATED TREE OR SHRUB PIT WILL PERFOLATE (DRAIN) PRIOR TO ADDING TOPSOIL AND INTALLING PLANT MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL THE BOTTOM OF SELECTED HOLES WITH SIX INCHES OF WATER. THIS WATER SHOULD PERCOLATE WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. THE OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY ACCURACY AND EFFECT OF PERCOLATION TESTING. IF THE SOIL AT A GIVEN AREA DOES NOT DRAIN PROPERLY, A PVC DRAIN OR GRAVEL SUMP SHALL BE INSTALLED OR PLANTING RELOCATED IF DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 23. SHOULD THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER UNSATISFACTORY SURFACE OR OTHER SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS, SOIL DEPTH, LATENT SOILS, HARD PAN, STEAM OF OTHER UTILITY LINES OR OTHER CONDITIONS THAT WILL JEOPARDIZE THE HEALTH AND VIGOR OF THE PLANTS, HE MUST ADVISE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF THE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE PLANTS, OTHERWISE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WARRANTS THAT THE PLANTING AREAS ARE SUITABLE PROPER GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED. 24. ALL HYDRANGEA PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM TOP SOIL DEPTH OF 12" WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS MET: 24.1. ALL PLANTS PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 2" ABOVE GRADE 24.2. BACKFILL ALL PLANTING HOLES WITH A MIX OF SPECIFIED GROWING MEDIUM AND TILLED TOPSOIL. 24.3. AMEND TOPSOIL WITH ROOT STIMULANT APPROPRIATE FOR HYDRANGEAS. 24.4. VERIFY PLANTING PITS HAVE PASSED PERCOLATION TEST. iULUH Xe" METAL EDGER W/ STAKE, PER SPEC. FINISHED GRADE AND EDGE CONDITION VARIES - SEE PLAN FOR CONDITION. 07 STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER L501 OPLANT ROW-TYP. O OO PLANT CENTER-TYP. TRIANGULAR SPACING -'S' DISTANCE BETWEEN ROWS -'D' TOTAL AREA PER PLANT (SF) 12" 10-1/2" 0,88 15" 13" 1.35 18" 15-1/2" 1.94 21" 18" 2.63 24" (2') 21" 3.50 30" 26" 5.42 36" (T) 31" 7.75 42" 36" 10.50 05 PLANT SPACING, TYP L501 'U z ua E� U H I--t x U 1=4 V) R' W z C0 W Q W Z Z r, Q M Q LO v O �_ w r = w O n O Lu �N Z m Z_ ::E p w U)M O 04 I-- W ON Z O 0 6 CQ :2 no LNLI N (D ON ON n LLJ�Z� 01 Oa GV �E � CI V N CA 00 0 0ON 04 0 = X W V C W J U. O U A y D D0Z O 0w00-a c0 NLL z�� z Om OO 12U 0 S 2 Q m N O Z 2 33 y>p rrOwLL x O ryyw 00 U ]NWU ply WlJ a:J2,y �Wz" Zz ®KD2p ZZ � W �w 0 000D LD ryZ FaF� � W E m K Z N K F Z a�aoy-O oaaaa? a �I V I LU W 1 J W Q LLJ � O Z Cn CO W Z N.T.S. C) O Z w r n Ln Q t/ Z T 1 V PLANTING DETAILS PROJECT NO: 17164 DRAWN BY: EN CHECKED BY: TM N.T.S. I L501 FILL TOP OF PIPE W/ GONG. MIN. 6" b" VIA - 5TL. PIPE ° FILL BOTTOM OF PIPE O . WITH SAND 6^ - 1/2' EXP. MAT'L GROUND LEVEL ` e V 15" x 18" POURED GONG. FOOTING, TYP. 2 BOLLARD - EXTERIOR AA I.00 v = 1'-0" FOOTING, PIER, AND SIGN DESIGN AND INSTALLATION BY m SIGNAGE CONTRACTOR e PAINTED ALUMINUM CABINET WITH LED LIT 6" LETTER SIGNAGE. COORDINATE VERBAGE WITH OPERATOR CONCRETE PIER ,n ~8. GRADE LINE �ey� :2 0 I 8 — CONCRETE FOOTING c r O d m I b d ENGINEERED SOILS PER GEOTEGHNICAL REPORT DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE RECOMMENDATIONS 1/2" = 1'-O.' 51TE PLAN KEYNOTES O BOLLARDS, COORDINATE LOCATION WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR O2 DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE O MONUMENT SIGN \J FLAG POLE \5/ GATE. PROVIDE KNOX BOX AT BOTH LOCATIONS, COORDINATE CONTENTS WITH CITY OF CHANHASSEN. 'z W x W z I --I W Q W a m O Z w w V d O N w W Z qV C 04 M Q ^ OZ O \0 ,0 - O. I^� W w O, ^ W "ZZ_ (� o w0a"' a uv 04 C�) N m d LL O O N i 1 W Q 0 0 W N N w i\Lu LLJ ~ W LU O LI)w z Z 0 r)� Z Q L. ') v r /� V I 0 Q = Z =v ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN PROJECT NO: 14-040 DRAWN BY: AJA CHECKED BY: 1V 51TE PLAN 1„ = 40'-0„ Al *00 12/19/2017 1:06:44 PM POWER & COMMUNICATION LEGEND 9 120V DUPLEX OUTLET 120V QUAD OUTLET ¢W 240 VOLT RECEPTACLE v DATA/COMMUNICATIONS OUTLET • TELEPHONE OUTLET + TELEVISION OUTLET DATA/TV COMBO OUTLET + TELE/TV OUTLET ® FLOOR OUTLET ❑J JUNCTION BOX 0 0 0 PUSHBUTTON STATION OS SPEAKER TC TIME CLOCK FN 'Cl NURSE CALL PULL STATION ® MOTOR CONNECTION '= ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT `(SJ ELECTRICAL STARTER DISCONNECT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION W/NON-FUSED DISCONNECT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION W/FUSED DISCONNECT ELECTRICAL CONNECTION W/WEATHER PROOF DISCONNECT3 ® ELECTRICAL CONNECTION W/20A SWITCH FUSE ® PANELBOARD OT THERMOSTAT MOUNTED AT 48" A.F.F. EX INDICATES EXISTING DEVICE RL INDICATES RELOCATED DEVICE NURSE CALL LIGHT I LIGHTING LEGEND RECESSED 20 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE Z RECESSED 2x2 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE 0 INDICATES NIGHTLIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES EMERGENCY FIXTURE INDICATES EMERGENCY/NIGHTLIGHT FIXTURE m SURFACE MOUNT tx4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE HIGH BAY 2x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE �Q-- SURFACE WALL MOUNTED FLUORESCENT FIXTURE SURFACE CEILING MOUNT FLUORESCENT FIXTURE Q RECESSED DOWNLIGHT Q SURFACE WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE SURFACE MOUNTED FIXTURE SURFACE MOUNTED PENDANT FIXTURE 0=0 OUTSIDE POLE -MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE e EXTERIOR GROUND MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURE LED EXIT SIGN -SHADED AREA INDICATES ILLUMINATED FACE LED EXIT/EMERGENCY SIGN -SHADED AREA INDICATES ILLUMINATED FACE EXTERIOR EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHT SINGLE POLE SWITCH $2 2-POLE SWITCH $3 3-WAY SWITCH $4 4-WAY SWITCH sP SWITCH W/PILOT LIGHT ® WALL MOUNTED SINGLE LEVEL OCCUPANCY SENSOR ® WALL MOUNTED DUAL LEVEL OCCUPANCY SENSOR ®S CEILING MOUNTED OCCUPANCY SENSOR NL INDICATES FIXTURE TO REMAIN ON FOR SECURITY PURPOSES A,B INDICATES LIGHT FIXTURE SWITCH -LEGS P-X INDICATES PANEL AND CIRCUIT NUMBER (D INDICATES LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE EX INDICATES EXISTING FIXTURE RL INDICATES RELOCATED FIXTURE TC INDICATES FIXTURE CONTROLLED BY TTMECLOCK EM INDICATES EMERGENCY FIXTURE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE TYPE LAMPS WATTAGE DESCRIPTION NOTES AA - - SMALL EXTERIOR WALL PACK - BB - - MEDIUM EXTERIOR WALL PACK - CC - - EXTERIOR RECESSED DOWNLIGHT - DD - - BOLLARD FIXTURE - EE - - POLE MOUNT FIXTURE, TYPE II OPTICS, 25' POLE - FF - - POLE MOUNT FIXTURE, TYPE III OPTICS, 25' POLE - GG - - POLE MOUNT FIXTURE, TYPE IV OPTICS, 25' POLE - HH - - DUAL HEAD POLE MOUNT FIXTURE, TYPE II OPTICS, 25' POLE - NOIES: ANCHOR BOLTS WITH LOCK WASHERS PER MFGR'S SPECS. l'- 45• CHAMFER CADWELD GROUND 5/8'X10' COPPER CLAD DRIVEN GROUND ROD AT EACH BASE. BOND TO REBAR, CONDUIT, AND ANCHOR BOLTS WITH MIN. 1/8 BONDING JUMPER. KEEP REBAR 3" FROM EDGE OF FORM PROVIDE 4#6 REBAR VERTICAL, #3 REBAR HORIZONTAL AT 16" #4 VERTICAL REBAR (4 REQ'D, CONDUIT -KEEP CONDUIT WITHIN 6" DIA. 3/4" CONDUIT STUB FOR GROUNDING WIRE 1 6" AS REQ'D VERIFY FIXTURE BASE SIZE =23' STUB OUT 6" FROM EDGE OF BASE -ANCHOR BOLTS PARALLEL TO SIDEWALK OR PAVEMENT -CONDUIT PITCH TO DRAIN -BOLT CIRCLE-VERIFIY WITH ACTUAL POLE DIMENSIONS f4 STEEL REBAR DIA. AT 16" O.C. NOTE: 1.)USE MFGR'S DIMENSIONS FOR EXACT ANCHOR BOLT AND COVER PLACEMENT. 2.)INSTALL INLINE FUSES IN EACH UNGROUNDED CONDUCTOR WITHIN POLE BASE HAND HOLE. 3.)TROWEL FINISH EXPOSED PORTION OF BASE TO REMOVE/COVER FORM MARKS. � POLE BASE DETAIL E1.1 NOT TO SCALE SITE NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR A COMPLETE AND FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. 2. MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH CODES, UTILITY REQUIREMENTS, LAWS AND ORDINANCES OF FEDERAL, STATE, OSHA AND LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CODES AND STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT THAT ARE LISTED BUT NOT LIMITED TO: NEC, NFPA, NEMA, ANSI, IES, IEEE, NFPA LIFE SAFETY 101, ASHRAE 90.1, IECC ENERGY CODE AND IBC BUILDING CODE. 4. PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING, TRENCHING, ETC. CONTACT ALL LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND MUNICIPALITIES AND CONFIRM EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 5. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LISTED AND/OR LABELED BY UL OR ANOTHER NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY. 6. ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, WIRING DEVICES, ETC SHALL BE NEW, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED AS EXISTING TO BE REUSED. 7. ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED, HANDLED, ERECTED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, CLEANED, ADJUSTED, TESTED, CONDITIONED AND PLACED IN SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS DIRECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 8. COORDINATE THE UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE FEEDS AND INSTALLATION. 9. ALL POLE FIXTURES TO BE LOCATED 4' AWAY FROM EDGE OF CURB. 10. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE CONNECTED TO A COMMON EQUIPMENT GROUND. USE #8, TYPE THWN. 11. ALL CIRCUIT TO BE PLACED IN 1" CONDUITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CIRCUIT TO USE COPPER WIRE, TYPE THWN. 12. THE CONTROLLING LIGHTING CONTACTORS SHALL BE MOUNTED INSIDE THE BUILDING WITH TIME -CLOCK CONTROL & REMOTE PHOTOCELLS LOCATED ON THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE BUILDING WALL. INSTALL PHOTOCELLS AT LOCATIONS WHERE BUILDING OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THEIR PROPER OPERATION. FINAL BRANCH CIRCUIT SUPPLY CONNECTIONS WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 13. MIN. BURIAL DEPTH FOR THE LIGHTING CIRCUIT SHALL BE 24". A SLIGHT DECREASE IN DEPTH IS ALLOWED WITHIN 10' OF THE POLES. 14. VERIFY CONSTRUCTION AREAS ON OTHER SITE PLANS FOR POTENTIAL OBSTACLES AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. * '0.1 '0.1 '0.1 *0.1 '0.1 +0.1 *0.1 '0.1 *0.1 '0.1 .2 *0.2 *0.2 '0.1 *0.1 0. *0.3 *0.2 +0.1 *0.1 / - -- - ---- 0� 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 0.2 0. 0.4 0.4 .2 _ ALL LOCATIONS. + 10. # + + + 0.1� , +10.+*0.+ 10. + 7. ALL MEASUREMENTS TO TOP OF BOX. RECEPTACLES SHALL BE 20" p + / �� 0.1 1 0.2 2 0.1 0.1 0.1 2 0. + + 0.8 0.6 0.5 0 t A.F.F. SWITCHES SHALL BE 48" A.F.F. / / / ♦ 0.7 0. 1.1 1.0 0.8 + + + 0 .2 .-0�3 0.3 1 8. GFI PROTECT ALL RECEPTACLES WITHIN 6' OF EVERY SINK. ', 0 3 ; 1 0.1 /+ f + 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0. 1.5 1.4 1.2 0 )w 0.1 EE '0.1 +0.1 ' +0.5 10.6 *0.8 ' ' +0.4 10.2 +0.2 ' +1.7 +1.4 +1.3 *1. +0 ' .3 10.2 10.1 +0.1 Zz '0.1 '0.1 0 ' +0.8 '1. 1.1 10.8 10.5 10.3 2 10.3 10.9 '1.4 '1.4 +1.2 +0. '.5 3 +0.2 +0.1 10.1 Z 1 0.1 0.1 0 0.4,.7 1.2 1.4 2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.4 0. 0.3 10. 2 +0. .1 1 0 ' +0 <CV.8 +1. +1. +1.5 + *0.7 +0.4 10.3 + +0.8 +1.0 +1.1 *1. '0 ' +0.1 / / + + + + + + + 0.1 + 0.1 0. + 0+ + ; * + + + + +��0:9 1.4 .5 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.9 0 0 .4 0.2 / +0.1 '0.1 +0. +0.6 +1. '1.6 +1.6 + +1.2 +0.5 10.5 .7 10.8 +0.8 +0.7 + ' + .4 +0.3 +0.1 +0 + + + +1. + g�� + + 10. { 0.1 0.1 0 0.6 0.8 1 1. 1.0 0.6 1.0 .0 1.0 yn .4 .3 0.2 1 0.1 / '0.1 +0 + '0.6 +0.9 +1.1 +1.2 +1.1 +0.8 +0.8 *1 Lt) .0 + 0.4 10.3 *0.2 EE + + + + � + # ; + 0 + + + + 0.5 0.9 1.4 1. + + 0.8 1.0 1.6 + } 1.4 01,5.2 .7 .5 0. 0. i 0.1 .i 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.4 1.7 .6 0.7 0.9 1.6 1.4�*1� 1.0 .7 0. 0.3 0.2 0. 0.1 .1 � 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.7 1. 1. 1.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 0 0.3 0.2 0.1 i o + + + + + + + + ; { + + + + t + + + + � 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.3 .5 1.3 .9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.1 .8 .4 0.2 0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 / 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.4 0.6 1. 1. 1.7 / 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 0. .7 U. 0.3 0. 1 0. + i +1. t + + + + 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 i 1.1 1.4 1 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.3 +0.1 / 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 1. 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 1 0.1 0.1 0,3 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.5 L6 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.2 1. 0. 0. 0.2 0.1 .1 G t+{ + + # + +++ i+ i 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.9 1 6 1.0 0.6 1 1.1 1 0.6 0.1 *0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.3 + + .9 '1.2 +1.6 +1.8 +1.8 +2.0 E +0.8 10.9 +1.1 1.55 *1 +1. *0.4 *0.1 f + ++ # + f + ; ; + + + + + + + ' � 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0. 0. .8 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1 .7 + + 0 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.9 + + 2. G 1.2 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 *0.1 +0.1 10.2 *0.2 .3 .5 +1.2 '1.2 +1.1 '1.0 +1.2 '1.3 +1.4 '1.1 +0. 0. +0. o. 7 *0.8 +1.1 +1.8 2. +1. *0.2 10.1 ' + + + + ; + + + + + + ♦ + + + + + + + + + + + + / 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 .4 0.9 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.1 0. 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 .7 .7 .7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1. .5 .1 0.3 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 10.1 +0.2 + + 1.0 +1.3 *1.3 1.5 +1.6 + 4 + +1.4 ' .7 +1.8 +1.2 '1.0 U 8 +0. + . +0.7 +0.9 +1.0 +1.1 1.1 +0. 4 +0.1 +0.1 i / 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1 0.1 0.2 0 0 0 .7 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.6 EE 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.2 .4 +1 8 2.6 1.7 1.0 � 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 .9 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.+ 10.6 +0.9 +1.0 +1.2 +1. 1.5 +1.1 10.4 +0.3 +0.3 +0.3 + + +2.5 +1.8 +1.1 ;.8 r 0.7 + +0. +0.7 +0.7 +0.6 5 + +0.3 +0.2 +0.1 + .3 0.1 / +0.1 +0.1 + + •4 + +0.6 +0.7 10.8 10.9 *0.9 10.9 .8 +0.6 10.4 *0.3 +0. 6 *1.0 + '2.0 +1.5 '1.1 10.8 /+ 0.0.6 6 '0 *0.7 10.7 +0.7 *0.7 * . / .5 +0 3 0.2) 3" FOR LOW VOLTAGE 0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0. 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 5 0.5 1 1 .� .2 .0 1.3 .2 1.0 0.7 \ .6 0.6 0 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9- 0. 0. 0.4 0.2 0.1 / 10. 1 .1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0. 0.8 1.1 1.4 1. 1. 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 10. 8 10. 7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.0I 0.6 0.2 + + f + + + + 4{ ; + ; t + i / ; * 2 ; UTILITY TRANSFORMER / OT 0. 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 .3 0. 4 0.7 1.2 1.5 1 1.2 1.0 0. 0.8 .820.8 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0. T1 1 2.7 2.0 1.5� 0.6 0.1 / + 10 + + + + + + + + +1 +1 + + + + + + + + + ; + + + { + + + + + + + + �f / + + + + + + 0.1 0.1 .1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 1.6 1. 0 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 i. 1. 0 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.8 2.7 2.9 1.5 0.4 Opt/ 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 .5 .5 .4 0.6 1.0 1.5 1. 2.7 +1.6 +1.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 1q 1.4 I1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1. 1 j 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.2 .7 HH G / 0.1 J0.1 .2 0.4 0, 0 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.2 .5 2.0 .5 9 8 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 +0 6 _ +0 7 0.7 0. 1.6 1.5 1.2_kJ .6 .3 0.3 1 +0.1' +0.2 +0.4 +0. + +0.7 +0.6 +0.7 + +1.1 +1.4 * +2.1 +1.8 +1.7 *1.7 +1.4 ).0 10.8 '0.7 '0.6 0.6 +0.8 +1. +0.7 +0.5 2.5 U./ +0. 9 2 +1.3 +1.1 +1.0 i0 7 2 0 ®+47 10.8 0.7 +1.4 +1.6 I +0.7 +0.2 +0.1 / ODD / / + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + { + + + + + + + + + + + + �1 0 0. .1 1.1 0.9 0. .6 0.7 1.1 .3 .5 7 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 3.2 °4. 1.6 0.4 2. 2.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3/ 0.4 +0.5 '0.3 *0.7 *0.8 *1.0 .3 A+7.0 +1.1 +0.2 10.1 bo CC (\ + + + + + * + + + + + f + + + ` + 0.1 0.3 0. 1.4 1.2 0.6 0.6 0 0. + + + 1.0 1.4 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.0 � .9 .8 + 0.5 1. 68 .3 + 0 .7 + + + + ; + +0. CC CC ODD 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 ° / + + ).5 i+ i + + + + + + + ; + + 1+ + + + 1 + + 1 0.2 0 0. .3 .5 0.8 0.6 0.6 0+ +.7 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 1. 1. 7 5. 0.5 .1 5.1° 7.Oc+ + f 10.1 1.2 6.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 i p/ 4 + { + + + + 1+ + + ++D C l + + + '0.1 0.1 0. .0 1.3 7 1.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.0 .0 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.9 1 1.1 2.1 0.4 1.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 EE ° +0.1/ *0.2 0.4 ' .8 +1.3 +1.4 + *0.8 +0.3 +0.3 10.4 +5.2 * . +1.0 +0.9 9 +1. 1. 1. + .8 10.4 *0.2 +0.2 +0. D .7 2.8 C +0 / F . / + f + + ; + ' + + + + t 0.1 �.1 0.3 0. 0. 1.3 1.4 1.3 0.4 D. 0. 0.7 .9 + t + + + + + 1. 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.2 0. 0 0.4 0.4 *0.1 r '0.1 +0 10. *0. +1.1 +1.0 *0.6 +0.2 1 *0.7 +1 +0.6 10.3 +0.3 *0.4 10. *0.4 *0.2 + DO +0.1/ +0.2 .3 *0. +0. 10.8 +0.6 +0.2 +0.7 *1. +4.0 +0.3 *0.2 10.4 +1 A + 2 + *3.SAA . / *0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0. +0. 10.5 *0.3 0.1 + * .6 '0.5 +0.2 '0.1 + *5.1 +2.8 10.6 *0.1 �a.l *a.l 10.2 +o. 'o.a *0.3 10.2 1 'o. '2. +1.2 +o. PROPOSED BUILDING + 3 *o.s +o.s *o.s +o.s 10.2 *0.1 + '0.2 'o. *0.3 .1 +0.1 +0. *0.1 + HE 924.50 / I LFE 913.50 +0.1 .1 *0.2 +0. 0.2 +0. +0.1 +0.1 *0.3 1.9 +0.9 +0.3 +0.1 i / +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 * ,1 0.1 *0.1 +0.1 *0.2 +0.6 *0.6 +0.5 +0.2 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 0.1 0.2 10.5 *0.9 10. 5.0 '1.9 +0.4 +0.1 AA / +0.2 0.6 *1.1 +1.1 � r 2.3 +0.4 +0.1 BB \ ' +0.1 FF +1.0 +1.6 +1.2 +0.9 + +1. +7.8 0 \ j +0.3 + .1 � 2\ *0.1 +0.2 .6 +1.8 +1.7 +1.1 +1.0 '1.1 +1.3 +2. +S_ AA7.0 0.8 10.1 +0.1 +0. BB B + 0.3 +1.0 +1.5 +1.3 +1.0 +1.2 * .7 + +0.9,+figQ+O ' 1 +0.2 +1.1 +4.9 +4.5 +1.8 +5.0 +5. 1 ' 0.1 +0.4 +1.0 *1.1 +0.9 10.9 +1.3 +3. BB .3/�+o + .1 +0.1 10.2 +0. + 5 +1.6 +1.3 +2.0 +2. +0. 0.1 0.2 I 0.8 0.8 1D 0.1 0.1 0.1 03 UT .4 00 0.4 ' UTILITY TRANSFORMER R .6 *0.2 *0.5 *0.6 +0.5 + +0.6 .1 +0.1 +0.1 + +0 10.2 *0.2 + 2 2 *0.1 i +0. *0.3 + .4 +0.4 *0.4 *0. +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 GENERATORS +0.1 '0.2 *0.2 '0.3 +0.3 +0.3 '0.2 +0.2 +0. * * + + � 0.3 0.1/�' 0.1 0.1 I +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.2 +0.2 10.2 +01 +0.1 +0.1 0.3 + 1.1 +0.3 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +o'l +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 10.0 +2.6 *0.4 +0.1 4. p I +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.6 +0.2 10.1 2 +1.4 *0.3 *0.1 +o.l +0.1 +0.2 '0.1 0.1 I i i i � I I r_7� ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 0 15' 30" so" E1.1 SCALE: 1" = 30' w z z 0 F a C) U W 0 z 0 rn w I 07 0 m m D z z in 0 0 r m F m p 0 U _ n N ¢ J 3 W w 0 r� Ln Lfl u ,J z J � V� 0 • o NOJ N o T� Ln W O W31Ln N O M o ui q o ao� 0 N W co'u�LC E CD Z �O N Z O I -1 n U Z W W I.J_ V / V) J Q ID = z U (n 00 Z w - a O �- z a Ld J ir a 6 W SHEET NO. Ell _I CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community for Life- ProvidingforToday and PlanningforTomorrow MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner DATE: May 8, 2017 SUBJ: Planned Unit Development Amendment, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan, and Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for the construction of 136 unit Multi -tenant senior housing apartment building, eight twin homes and a daycare -Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 "The Chanhassen City Council approves a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards (Mission Hills PUD), Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 136-unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building, eight twin homes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'a Addition, , and resolution approving a Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for a trail connection on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills); and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact." Approval requires a simple majority vote of City Council present. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following is a summary of the requests: Planned Unit Development Amendment, a Preliminary Plat approval, a site plan approval and Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for a trail connection, to construct a four-story, 136-unit senior housing apartment building that houses a daycare center and eight twin homes. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 18, 2017 to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 6 — 0 recommending approval of the development as proposed subject to the conditions of the staff report. PH 952.227.1100 • www.d.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 Todd Gerhardt Mission Hills P Addition February 22, 2016 Page 2 As part of the discussion, some issues were raised regarding left turning movements from West 86lh Street to Highway 101. Staff is inactive communication with the Carver County Public Works Office regarding this issue. RECOMMENDATION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards (Mission Hills PUD), Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 136-unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building, eight twin homes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition,, and resolution approving a Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for a trail connection on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills); and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact " ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated April 18, 2017. g:\plan\2017 planning cases\17-07 mission hills senior living\cc preliminary cover memo.doc PC DATE: 4/18/2017 CC DATE: 5/8/2017 REVIEW DEADLINE: 5/16/2017 CASE #: 2017-07 BY: Al-Jaff, et al. PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen City Council approves a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards (Mission Hills PUD), Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 136-unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building, eight twin homes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3' Addition, and resolution approving a Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for a trail connection on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills); and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Planned Unit Development amendment, replat of 8.64 acres into one lot, and site plan review for the construction of a four- story senior housing apartment, eight twin homes and a daycare center. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. (On February 23, 2015, the Chanhassen City Council approved a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards (Mission Hills PUD), Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 134-unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building and nine twin homes, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills and Addition, on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills). On February 22, 2016, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat, development contract and construction plans for Mission Hills Yd Addition subject to the conditions. These documents were never recorded and the approval lapsed.) LOCATION: 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills) North of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86's Street APPLICANT: Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. Eric Reiners 4200 W. Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, MN 55437 P: 952.996.9662 E: etic(a,sra-mn.com Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC Michael Hoagberg 17550 Hemlock Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 952.378.4386 mhoagberg@.headwatersdevelonment.biz PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development Mixed Use — PUD, Mixed Use 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Mixed Use ACREAGE: 8.64 Acres (376,358 square feet) DENSITY: 17.5 Units per Acre Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 2 of 36 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving amendments to PUDs because the city is acting in its legislative or policy -making capacity. A PUD amendment must be consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan. The city's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The request consists of multiple applications to facilitate the construction of a four-story senior housing apartment building that contains a child daycare, eight twin homes and a daycare center. The requests include a Planned Unit Development Amendment to existing standards, a site plan for an apartment building that houses a daycare, twin homes and a subdivision to replat an outlot into a lot. The site is located North of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 861b Street. The site is zoned Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. Sewer and water are available to the site. Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86a' Street. The applicant scheduled a neighborhood meeting on April 13, 2017 to brief the neighborhood within 500 feet of the subject site on the project and seek comments and suggestions. (report continued on next page) Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 3 of 36 The folloxcing 1, ,i �ununary of the requests: 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment: The first request is to amend the ordinance regulating the use on the site from Commercial to Residential and/or Commercial. 2. Subdivision/Preliminary Plat: The second request is for subdivision approval to replat 8.64 acres into a lot. 3. Site Plan: The final request is for a site plan to construct a four-story, 136-unit senior housing apartment building that houses a daycare center and eight twin homes. Site coverage is averaged over the entire development. This is permitted under the PUD ordinance (Section 20-505 (e)). The total permitted site coverage is 50 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 47.8%. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 4 of 36 The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high -quality materials. They include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the strictures will have sloped shingle roofs. The twin homes will reflect some of the architectural elements of the apartment building yet maintain their individuality. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. Parking is buffered from views by buildings and landscaping. Sidewalks and trails allow for connections between the subject site and the surrounding buildings and separates pedestrian from vehicular traffic. Access to the site is provided via West 86a' Street. There will not be direct access to Highways 212 or 101 (Great Plains Boulevard). 4. Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for a trail connection that requires grading within Highway 101 right -of --way. Staff regards the project as a well -designed development. The overall design is sensitive to the surrounding area. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan, subdivision and planned unit development amendment with conditions as outlined in the staff report. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article 3XII, Division 9. — Design Standards for Multifamily Developments (report continued on next page) Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 5 of 36 BACKGROUND The Land Use Plan designates areas around the Highways 101/212 interchange as mixed use. This category has been established to accommodate either commercial or high - density residential developments. The high - density category, which includes units with a maximum net density of 16.0 units per acre, accommodates apartments and higher density condominium units, but would also permit the development of townhome-type units. The Mission Hills development was approved prior to the realignment of CSAH 101 (Great Plains Boulevard) and the construction of Highway 212. The subject site was platted as an outlot to accommodate this road work, which has since been completed allowing the site to be developed. On October 24, 1994, the City Council approved the following: • Rezoning the site from RSF to PUD (#934). The uses within the PUD allowed for Low Density Residential at the northeasterly portion, Medium Density along the center of the site and Neighborhood Commercial along the southwesterly portion; • Final plat of Mission Hills for 16 single-family lots and 75 medium -density lots to accommodate a total of 210 units and an outlot for future commercial development; and • Site Plan #94-5 for the construction of 194 townhouses. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 6 of 36 The site permitted a total of 212 units within the medium density section of the site. The total number of units built was 194 units (18 units remaining). The low density residential section of the site allowed 34 units. The total homes built were 16 (18 units remaining). The Planned Unit Development Ordinance allows the transfer of density within the boundaries of a PUD. These remaining unused units are proposed to be transferred to the proposed senior housing site to accommodate the proposed 136-unit apartment building and eight twin homes. Total Acres Density # of Units Permitted I # of Units Built Low Density 8.5 4 units per acre 34 16 Medium Density 26.5 8 units per acre 212 194 Total 246 210 On February 23, 2015, the Chanhassen City Council approves a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards (Mission Hills PUD), Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 134-unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building and nine twin homes, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3`d Addition, on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills). On February 22, 2016, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat, development contract and construction plans for Mission Hills Yd Addition subject to the conditions. These documents were never recorded and the approval lapsed. SITE PLAN In order to provide a better understanding of the overall development, staff will first review the site plan component, which in turn leads to the PUD amendment. The building must comply with the Development Design Standards for Mission Hills. A PUD is required to be developed to a higher quality than other projects. Site coverage is averaged over the entire development. This is permitted under the PUD ordinance (Section 20- 505 (e)). The total permitted site coverage is 50 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area 47.8%. The site plan request is for the construction of a four-story senior housing apartment building that contains a daycare center and eight twin homes. In order to accommodate those residential units, the planned unit development standards pertaining to uses on the subject site will need to be amended. The proposed daycare is proposed to be accommodated within the footprint of the main Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 7 of 36 housing structure and occupies approximately 8,600SF. The daycare provides child care for up to 90 children. Sidewalks and trails allow for connections between the subject site and the surrounding buildings and separates pedestrian from vehicular traffic. Access to the site is provided via 86' Street. There will not be direct access to Highway 212 nor Great Plains Boulevard. Parking is proposed along the middle of the site and below the apartment building. It is buffered from views by the buildings and landscaping. The minimum setback in the PUD district is 50 feet from the residential district. The apartment building maintains a minimum of 90 feet at the closest point to the westerly property line and increases to 110 feet. There is a 20-foot parking and drive aisle setback from all exterior property lines. The proposed development complies with the required setbacks. The trash enclosure will be located within the underground parking area serving the apartment building. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high -quality materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 8 of 36 The building has pronounced entrances, utilizes durable exterior materials, and exhibits articulation. All elevations have received well -articulated attention to detail. MIDI CNL1716 BRRY V6TELlt Mp DIW! WLQ GNiOfY A& VH'1 fRLM �T V QWW MONROR M*M W~VA Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 9 of 36 vB4oF srtE.wa. ne ww e4mY o� 77 - _.— y8Y(fi ajfC 1A$1�MY YJl. TF/ TPhD1 :,en The eight twin homes will be located along the northeasterly portion of the site. The design and colors used on the buildings will complement the apartment building and remain within the same color family, however; each unit will have some unique features. Utilizing the basic building footprint, the applicant modified the exterior components and colors to create four unique yet compatible design options for the twin homes. The location of each design type is placed within the layout of eight buildings to create a maximum separation between each design option. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 10 of 36 Design Option #2 Features color scheme #2 with a gable roof design over the front bay window, square four - post column at front walk and garage door with transom windows. Design Option #1 Features color scheme #1 with a shed roof design over the front bay window, tapered siding column at front walk and standard garage door. Design Option #3 Features color scheme #1 with a gable roof design over the front bay window, square four - post column at front walk and standard garage door. Design Option #4 Features color scheme #2 with a shed roof design over the front bay window, tapered siding column at front walk and garage door with transom windows. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 11 of 36 The total number of units proposed on the site is 136 units housed in the apartment building and 16 units in nine twin homes. When the Mission Hills development was created, the development was allowed a density of: Area # of Units Permitted # of Units Built Total Remaining Medium Density 26.5 212 194 18 High Density subject Site 8.64 138 0 138 Total 35.14 350 194 156 The total number of units proposed is 152. The PUD ordinance permits the transfer of density within the boundaries of a development. Staff is recommending approval of the transfer of the remaining medium density to the high density site to accommodate the proposed development. The day care component which will be housed inside the apartment building is a complementary use for the senior housing and is intended to promote intergenerational interaction which has proven beneficial for both children and older adults. Staff regards the project as a well -designed development. The overall design is sensitive to the surrounding area. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions as outlined in the staff report. LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The applicant has submitted a lighting plan and a photometrics plan has been prepared for the site. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. All fixtures must be shielded. The development is permitted one monument sign. The total sign area may not exceed 24 square feet and 5 feet in height. A sign is proposed along the west facing Great Plains Boulevard. This sign is in a "V" shape. Y0111YEYL MCMLECi11ML FLFYBETB� �4.1 UgWENI ARCMITECTV LELEMENTS Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 12 of 36 The city code allows double-faced signs if the angle between the two faces does not exceed 45 degrees. The plans reflect a 30-degree separation. City code limits the number of monument signs to one per lot. The total area of the monument signs is 24 square feet and the height is 5 feet which is in keeping with the district regulations. The ordinance requires one parking space per twin home unit for a total of 16 spaces. The applicant is providing 16 spaces. The ordinance requires one parking space per independent living apartment unit. Sixty-six spaces are required and provided. The ordinance requires one parking space per three assisted -living units. Twelve spaces are required and provided. The ordinance requires one parking space per employee. The applicant is providing 24 spaces. The ordinance also requires one space per four units. The total number required is 38. The applicant is providing 38 spaces. The ordinance requires on space for every 6 children in the day care. The space is designed to allow for a maximum capacity of 90 children. This translates to 15 spaces which are provided. The total number of spaces required is 186 which is the number provided by the applicant. ARCHITECTURAL. COMPLIANCE Size, Portion and Placement Entries: The building has pronounced entrances. Articulation: The buildings incorporate adequate detail and have been tastefully designed. The architectural style is unique to the buildings but will fit in with the surrounding area. The buildings will provide a variation in style through the use of masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. The building utilizes exterior materials that are durable and of high quality. Signs: All signage must meet the sign criteria in the Planned Unit Development Ordinance prescribed for this development. Material and Detail High quality materials are being used on the building. Color The colors chosen for the buildings are earth tones. The selection is unique, but blends in with the surrounding buildings. Height and Roof Design The building ranges in height between 14 and 51 feet. The number of stories ranges between one and four stories. The setback of the building exceeds the height of the building which will allow Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 13 of 36 for a balanced appearance and will not appear imposing. The roofline is staggered and contains dormers which adds articulation to the design of the buildings. All rooftop equipment must be screened from views. Facade Transparency All facades viewed by the public contain more than 50 percent windows and/or doors. Loading Areas, Refuse Areas, etc. The trash enclosure is located inside the building. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 14 of 36 (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Findin : The proposed development is consistent with the city's design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and the site plan review requirements. The site contains a number of outdoor seating areas and walking paths that connect to city trails. The overall design provides adequate open space. The design incorporates the curb appeal criteria listed in the city code which includes: (1) Orientation to the street or access road: (a) Setbacks (b) Spacing between buildings and view sheds. (2) Architectural detail/decorative features. (a) Windows. (b) Flower boxes. (c) Porches, balconies, private spaces. (d) Location and treatment of entryway. (e) Surface materials, finish and texture. (f) Roof pitch. (g) Building height and orientation. (3) Location of garages. (4) Landscaping including fencing and berming. (5) Street lighting. (6) Screening of parking, especially in apartment and condominium developments. (7) Variations/differentiations in units including, but not limited to, color, material, articulation etc. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the city's image. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions outlined in the staff report. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The applicant is proposing 8 twin homes, 136 unit senior housing structure and a daycare center for 90 children on an 8.64 acre parcel of land. As part of the development, the applicant is requesting that the zoning be changed to PUD-Residential. The land is currently in agricultural production. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 15 of 36 SITE CONSTRAINTS Wetland Protection The City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the National Wetland Inventory do not indicate the presence of any wetlands on the subject property. A review of historic aerial photographs and on -site observations supports the conclusion that there are no wetlands on the subject property. Bluff Protection There are no bluffs on the property. Shoreland Management A significant portion of the subject property lies within the shoreland district for Lake Susan. The development will need to meet the PUD requirements for the DNR shoreland rules. This includes having a minimum of 50% preserved as green space; they are proposing just over 53%. In addition, they must meet the minimum standards for stormwater management and erosion prevention. They have provided a stormwater management plan and an erosion prevention and sediment control plan. By meeting the requirements of the city and the Watershed District the applicant will have satisfied the DNR standards. Floodplain Overlay This property does not lie within a floodplain. Bluff Creek Overlay This property does not lie within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. SITE GRADING: GRADING AND DRAINAGE Currently the site has three drainage areas. The majority of the site either drains north to 861h Street West or south to the Right -of -Way for MN T.H. 212. Approximately 16% of the site drains to the east to Mission Hills with much of this watershed making it to a storm water pond located at the intersection of Mission Hills Way and 86`h Street West. Under the proposed design, the site is divided into seven drainage areas that will leave the site at three distinct locations. A majority of the site will be treated and discharged to existing storm sewer systems: at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and 86* Street West, or the SW comer of the site goes either under Great Plains Boulevard and discharges onto 8601 Great Plains Boulevard, or enters the MnDOT stormwater system for TH 212. The low area where filtration basins #1 and #2 discharge shall be modeled or the discharge pipes shall directly tie-in to the MnDOT drainage system. Any discharge to MN/DOT or work within their right-of-way will require MnDOT approval and permitting. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 16 of 36 Plans must show the location and elevations of the Emergency Over -Flows (EOFs) on the project, specifically for Filtration Basin #1, #2, #4 and #5. Plans must show the style of home for the twin homes. SITE GRADING: EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL An erosion control plan consistent with Section 19-145 of city code will be required. This development exceeds the threshold for the NPDES Construction Permit. A Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required for review and approval. Many of the elements required in the SWPPP have been included in the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan sheet C100 and SWPPP plan sheet C500. The city has checklist of required SWPPP elements. This checklist will be made available to the applicant and the consulting engineer for use in their preparation of the SWPPP. The stand-alone SWPPP document shall be submitted for review with the final plat documents and will be required prior to any earth disturbing activities. The NPDES construction permit must be granted to the applicant prior to any earth disturbing activities. Stockpile locations shall be shown on the plans. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. Staff strongly recommends using plantings rather than seed, as seed can take up to three growing seasons to establish. The city will not release security until the vegetation is established. RETAINING WALLS The developer is proposing one retaining wall along the south of the proposed, main building and one retaining wall around the northern -most twin home. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. Any wall taller than 4 feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. The southern wall is approximately 360 feet long, with a maximum height of 19.5 feet. It runs parallel to the walkway around the southwestern side of the main building. The plans show a guardrail along the top of the wall to provide separation from the sidewalk. The northern retaining wall is approximately 200 feet long with a maximum height of 5 feet. This wall wraps around the northern most twin home, running between the home and Infiltration Basin #5. TRAFFIC STUDY The developer commissioned a traffic study to determine what impacts the proposed development would create compared with not developing the land. The study also reviewed the Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 17 of 36 maximum build -out of the site for the proposed zoning: residential apartment building. The results of the study show that the intersections of CSAH 101 and Lake Susan Drive, CSAH 101 and W. 80h Street, and W. 80s Street and Mission Hills Drive would have a negligible change in Level of Service and all the studied intersections are expected to function at acceptable levels. The city has been contacted by the Mission Hills Gardens Homeowners Association. This HOA is located nearby on the north side of W. 86`s Street. The two letters staff has received are included in this report. From these letters and a discussion with their Vice -President, the HOA's main concern is with, not an increase in delay from traffic, but the safety of the left turn from W. 86a' Street onto CSAH 101, intersection design as it exists today. Carver County cited that the intersection of CSAH 101 and W. 80s Street may need future improvements. City staff will continue to work with the County to determine if improvements at the intersection are warranted at this time. Staff also received notice that residents were concerned about the visibility around W. 86`s Street curves when cars are parked on that street. Staff completed a sight distance analysis and determined that the sight distance at the intersection of Mission Hills Drive and W. 86th Street is restricted when cars are parked on the north side (per the MnDOT Roadway Design Manual). On February 23, 2015, the City Council approved designation of a "No Parking" zone on a portion of West 80s Street. STREETS The proposed plan consists of two private streets, Oriole Drive and Oriole Lane, to provide access to the nine twin homes and the main building and parking lots. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7-ton design. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set: o Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping, and signing. o When designing internal traffic controls, incorporate improvements based on guidelines established in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internal roadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion. o Implement stop control at the site access to 86th Street to reduce the potential for driver confusion. o Review truck turning movements to ensure that large vehicles have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. o Implement one-way operations at the main entrance to the senior living facility primary parking lot. Continue one-way operations into the facility pick-up/drop-off zone to provide an orderly flow of traffic. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 18 of 36 o Modify the raised median at the 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection and stripe 86th Street to help delineate the travel/turn lanes. PARKING & WALKWAYS The site plan includes two parking lots for the main building and a smaller parking lot for the twin homes. The parking lot aisle of the twin home lot must be a minimum of 26 feet wide and the stalls shall be 18 feet long. The plans include sidewalks and trails throughout the property. The pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. Railing shall be provided near retaining walls taller than 6 feet. RESOLUTION FOR A LIMITED USE PERMIT MnDOT has required a Limited Use Permit (LUP) for the trail connection within MnDOT right- of-way. Attached is a resolution for City Council approval of the Mission Hills LUP. WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER MAIN — PRIVATE UTILITIES All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city's requirements for public utilities. The plan shall use 2017 Chanhassen standard detail plates, which are available on the city's website. The plans call for 8" C900 water main and 8" SDR 35 sanitary sewer main to connect to the services stubbed out in the city's previous utility projects on W. 86`h Street. ASSESSMENTS This property was assessed and has paid in full for property assessments for the projects that constructed water main and sanitary sewer main under W. 86a' Street. Currently, no assessments are owed by this property. This parcel has paid the city for one (1) water and sanitary service hook-up. The additional twin home units (7) must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook-up fee at the time of final plat. The remaining hook-up fees would be paid with the building permit. The developer shall work with the Building Department to determine the city SAC and WAC fees for the main building. The hook-up fees for the main building are due with the building permit. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of city code describes the required storm water management development standards. Section 19-141 states that "these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features." This site will need to be compliant with Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 19 of 36 the City of Chanhassen's MS4 permit. Part III D. 5 requires that new developments with a disturbance equal to, or greater than, one (1) acre must have no net -increase from pre - development conditions of stormwater discharge volume, total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorous (TP). The site will also need to be compliant with the NPDES Construction Permit. The site will fall under the jurisdiction of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and be subject to their stormwater management rule. This rule requires the abstraction of 1.1 inch of runoff from all new impervious surfaces and removal of 90% TSS (Total Suspended Solids) and 60% TP (Total Phosphorus). This is the same removal as indicated in Chapter 19 of city code. It is staffs understanding that this site received approval from the Watershed District in 2015 for a restricted site condition that reduces the requirements due to the unique features of the site. The applicant's engineer will continue to work with the Watershed District to update their permit. City staff will evaluate the design based on the requirements above until the city receives confirmation from the Watershed District that this project will be evaluated under a different requirement. The applicant provided a summary of the water quality benefits of the proposed practices from the MIDS calculator. The annual reduction by the proposed BMPs (Best Management Practices) are 67% removal for TSS and 60% removal for TP. This does not meet the requirements for TSS, so the design must be revised. The applicant has concluded, based upon the geotechnical report, that the soils are predominately lean clays which have a low infiltration rate. While this is a condition under which infiltration is limited, under the requirements of both the MS4 permit and the watershed district rules, the applicant must implement, to the "maximum extent practicable" volume reduction techniques other than infiltration. The applicant states that volume storage and some infiltration will be provided below the draintile elevation of the filtration basins. The P8 model shall conform to the MN Stormwater Manual's estimation of 0.06"/hour for Type D soils. The infiltrometer testing results for each basin shall be submitted to the city to verify the infiltration rate prior to release of the security for the filtration basins. The draintile shall have a grade of 0.5% to facilitate drainage flows and minimize sags. The construction plans shall include the following: cross -sections of each filtration basin with invert elevations called -out, source and quantity of iron filings, and method of mixing the filings and sand prior to placement. Staff recommends control outlets in filtration basins #3 and #5 to reduce saturated lawn conditions during basin drain -down. The current design removes only 20% of the required 1.1" of impervious run-off volume. The design must be revised to meet the 1.1" volume removal or the applicant must receive designation of a restricted site from the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. Staff recommends volume reduction by stormwater reuse for irrigation purposes as a preferred method. Given that as much as 4.5 acres could be irrigated upon final build out, storm water reuse could also result in a significant reduction in potable water use. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 20 of 36 All basins must have pretreatment of water prior to entering the feature. For those areas where curb cuts serve as the inlet, rip -rap is an effective energy dissipation method reducing the risk of scour however, it is an ineffective pre-treatment method. City staff has found pretreatment chambers, such as the Rain GuardianTM to be an effective pretreatment practice for curb cut inlets. The applicant is proposing pretreatment by grass swales and sump catch basins. In areas where storm water is directed to the basin through a catch basin, a sump manhole, at least three feet in depth should be used, four feet is recommended. Staff recommends installation of Downstream Defender or Preserver on sump manholes to reduce maintenance frequency on the private stormwater system. The plans shall label the sump catchbasins. The proposed BMPs will be privately owned. However, as these will be routed to the city's storm sewer system it is in the city's interest to assure that these function as designed for their life. It is also required under the city's MS4 permit that we have a mechanism in place to assure proper operations, maintenance and function of the practices. The applicant must provide an operations and maintenance (O&M) manual to the city for review and comment. The applicant must provide a drainage and utility easement over the filtration basins for city personnel to inspect the practices and to require maintenance if the property owner is negligent in their duties under the O&M. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. Staff strongly recommends using plantings rather than seed, as seed can take up to three growing seasons to establish. The city will not release security until the vegetation is established. The design should follow the MN Stormwater Manual guidelines and recommendations wherever possible to do so. The applicant shall provide justification for any deviations from the guidelines. For instance, it has been staffs experience that filter socks around drain file are prone to failure. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommends bedding the underdrain in #57 stone and using a choker course above the bedding. Surface Water Management Fees Section 4-30 of code sets out the fees associated with surface water management (SWMP). The fee is based on land use type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. The daycare SWMP fee is pro- rated at the commercial rate and the senior living is pro -rated at the high -density residential rate. The city gives credit toward the SWMP fee of 25% for volume reduction of 1.1". However, the proposed design only removes 201/6 of the required 1.1", so the credit is $6,625.59. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 21 of 36 This fee calculation is shown on the table below: Acres (pro -rated based on building square Per Acre Fee footage) Totals Surface Water Management Fee for Daycare $30,600.00 0.43 $13,219.20 Surface Water Management Fee for Senior Living $14,510.00 1 8.21 $119,098.08 Credit 20% * of the 1.1 "volume reduction $6,625.59 Total due at final plat $125 691.69 LANDSCAPING Minimum requirements for landscaping include 7,891 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, 2 landscape islands or peninsulas, 31 trees for the vehicular use areas, and bufferyard plantings along the property lines. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape 7,891 sq. ft. >7,891 sq. ft. area Overall trees required for 31 trees 31 trees vehicular use area Landscape islands or 2 islands/peninsulas 2 islands/peninsulas peninsulas/parkingpeninsulas/parking lot The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot/vehicular use area. Bufferyard requirements: Required plantings Proposed plantings Bufferyard B —north 4 Overstory trees 4 Overstory trees prop. line, 240' 9 Understory trees 6 Understory trees 14 Shrubs 16 shrubs Bufferyard B — south 5 Overstory trees 4 Overstory trees prop. line, 540' 10 Understory trees 10 Understory trees 20 Shrubs 20 Shrubs Bufferyard A — east prop. 1 6 Overstory trees 6 Overstory trees Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 22 of 36 Line, 650' 6 Understory trees 5 Understory trees 12 Shrubs 20 Shrubs Bufferyard B — west 20 Overstory trees 20 Overstory trees prop. Line, 1000' 30 Understory trees 16 Understory trees 50 Shrubs 10 Shrubs The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for bufferyard plantings. Underplanted areas are shown in italics. Staff recommends that the applicant meet minimum requirements for landscaping for the development. The east property line buffer is short only one tree, but the existing trees now serving as a buffer for the Mission Hills development are schedule to be removed and graded according to plans. Staff recommends that the south half of the east buffer yard area receive further review for additional plantings. The applicant should also consider locating landscaping near the corner of 80s St W and 101 to block headlight glare from turning vehicles. The corner unit is exposed to incoming light from turning vehicles and buffer plantings outside of the sight triangle could help alleviate the issue. As noted in the Landscape Plan General Notes, `park grade' trees are to be provided (item #12). This type of plant material does not meet city standards and is unacceptable. Item 12 of the general notes shall be deleted. PARKS This property is located within the 1/2-mile neighborhood park service area for Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the Mission Hills Senior Living community will have convenient access to this publicly maintained recreation facility. Chanhassen Hills Park is eight acres in size and features a playground, basketball court, picnic shelter, ballfield, benches, and walking trails. Off-street parking is also available on Chanhassen Hills Drive South. Bandimere Community Park and Lake Susan N i Sift f _ 101 j/ R &MERE JN,n G%RK _ e i Community Park are both located within the one -mile community park service of the new Mission Hills Senior Living housing. These two parks Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 23 of 36 are more robust in their recreation facility offerings, including features such as a fishing pier, boat landing, tennis courts, soccer fields, and extensive walking trails. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. TRAILS The subject site has convenient access to the public trails along Great Plains Boulevard, the three- mile Rice Marsh Lake Trail Loop, and the lakeside trail route to Lake Susan Park. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT The site is zoned Planned Unit Development. The designation for the southwesterly portion of the site is commercial. The land use plan designates the site for Mixed Use Development. This category allows commercial uses meeting the daily needs of a neighborhood and/or high -density residential uses. Amending the PUD ordinance regulating this site will be in keeping with the comprehensive plan. Staff is recommending approval of the amendment and adoption of the revised standards. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FINDINGS The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Fes: The site is guided mixed use (residential and neighborhood commercial). An apartment building with a daycare facility and townhouses are a permitted and a reasonable use in this location. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. Findin : The proposed use is and will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area through the implementation of the design standards, landscaping, architecture, etc. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: The proposed use will conform with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance such as design standards, signage, durable materials, uses, etc. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 24 of 36 d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed use will complement the surrounding area and will not depreciate it. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. Fes: The site is located within the Municipal Urban Service Area. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Findin : Based upon traffic studies conducted by the applicant's traffic engineer, traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. SUBDIVISION The developer is requesting preliminary plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot — Mission Hills 3d Addition. Lot 1 is proposed to house an apartment building with a daycare and eight twin homes. The ordinance states, "All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by the zoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontage on a public street." The lot has street frontage. Access to the lot is gained from a curb cut off of West 86d' Street. The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending Lot 1, ` Block 1 kf Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. SUBDIVISION FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. FindinE: The subdivision meets the intent of the city code subject to the conditions of the staff report and the PUD. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 25 of 36 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable plans. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter, Finding: The proposed subdivision will be served by adequate urban infiastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Fes: The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Findin : The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. 7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Flndin : The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban infrastructure. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 26 of 36 COMPLIANCE TABLE Lot Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Lot Coverage 50% 47.8%* Building Height Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Principal Four-story Four -Story Building Setbacks Ordinance Requirements Subject Site West Front yard 0' 110' South Front yard 0' 35' North Front yard 0' 30' East Rear yard 50' 80' Parking Requirements Ordinance Reguirements Subject Site Stalls 186 186 West Front yard setback 35' 90, South Front yard setback 35' 260' North Front yard setback 35' 150' East Rear yard setback 50' 90' RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt of the following three motions: 1. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT "The City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Mission Hills to allow High Density Use with a Childcare Center on the site and set standards for the structures as shown beloWTVINOWWMMMIAN w jgjlf with the following conditions. and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact. 1. The site must comply with the DNR Shoreland Rules. 2. The site shall comply with the following standards: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 27 of 36 Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the commercial development shall comply with the Neighborhood Business District, Bl. b. Permitted Uses these as defined hemift. The t�Te of uses to be provided an this autlet shail be lew ifiteasity neigMerhoed oriented retail and sefyiee establishnients te fneet daily needs of residenAs. Sueh uses may inelude small to fnedium sized restaumnt (fis drive thfu windew Chur-ehes are a permitted use n the al aFea of thisdistFiet The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: Single Family Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential C. Setbacks In the PUD standards.. the buildin setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of- way and/ or interior pro erty line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Street Commercial High Density Building Setback* Residential Residential Parking Setback Commercial Parking Setback* Building Setback Highway 101 * 50' x 20' Highway 212 * 50' 20' West 86"' Street * 30' 20' Interior Lot Lines O'(from commercial) 50 from residential 0' 0' 0' (from commercial) 35 from residential * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 9t6 Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 10`s Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 28 of 36 Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, l Ph Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12`s Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; Mission Hills 2"d Addition: lion: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Area: 376,358.4 Width: 480 feet _ Depth: 620 feet BLOCK USE Net Lot Density Hard Surface Area Coverage f e� 2 Multi -Family s/ChildChild Daycare Center Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi -Family 18 acres 7.66 37% Units Block 4. Mission Hills 56 Multi -Family Units 1 8.92 acres 6.28 43.2% Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 29 of 36 RESIDENTIAL Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. �pa _ ated Block l; §ion Lion : 6. Have pronounced entrance. b. Insure that all foundation walls eened by landscaping or retaining walls. c. Have materials which include mat ry, painted siding, and exterior finish and the e. Site Landscaping and Screening roofs. All The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2'/2 inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 30 of 36 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f. Signage One monument sign along Grains Boulevard shall be permed for Lot 1, Block 1 00don Hills 3ro Addition. 1. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 31 of 36 g• Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. 2. "The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. Unit Type No. of Units Amount Total Independent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000 Assisted/MemoryCare Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000 Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000 Total $478,000 Engineering Conditions: 1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69. These shall be due with the final plat. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 32 of 36 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance manual that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against the property. 4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the BMPs. Planning Conditions: 1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit (LUP) resolution and Site Plan application." 3. SffE PLAN APPROVAL "The City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 136-unit senior housing apartment with a childcare center and eight twin homes, Planning Case 2017-07 as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resource Conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for approval. The revised plan shall meet minimum bufferyard requirements. 2. Additional planting may be required along the southern half of the east property line. 3. Park grade trees are not acceptable quality and will not meet landscape standards for the City of Chanhassen. Item #12 of the General Notes shall be deleted. 4. The applicant shall consider locating landscaping along the rain garden near the corner of 86a' St W and 101 to block headlight glare from turning vehicles. Building Official Conditions: The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. A "Code Record" is required (Code Record schematic plans may be same scale as architectural). For "Code Record" information go to MN Dept. of Labor and Industry: ht=://www.dli.mn.yov/CCLD/PlanConstruction.@M 2. Buildings must be protected with automatic fire suppression systems. As required by Minnesota State Building Code and /or Minnesota State Residential Code. 3. An accessible route must be provided to all buildings, parking facilities, public transportation stops and common use facilities. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 33 of 36 4. Parking areas, including parking garages, must be provided with accessible parking spaces dispersed among the various parking areas and building entrances. 5. Accessible dwelling units must be provided in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. 6. The building owner and/or their representatives should meet with the Inspections Division to discuss plan review and permit procedures (in particular, type of construction and allowable area issues must be addressed). Fire Marshal Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow painted curbing will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for specifics. 3. Street names are required for the main road entering the project and the loop road serving the twin homes. Street signs shall be installed prior to building construction. The current street names proposed on the plan are Oriole Drive and Oriole Lane. The name Oriole has already been used within the City of Chanhassen and may not be reused within this development. Alternative proposed street names must be submitted to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. 4. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Prior to combustible construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 6. In lieu of a fire lane to the back side of the building, additional fire protection features shall be provided, including but not limited to Class 1 standpipes installed per Fire Department requirements. 7. Provide to Chanhassen Fire Marshal radius turn dimensions for accessing the building. The concern is the center islands for getting fire apparatus to the front doors. Engineering Conditions: 1. The low area where filtration basins #1 and #2 discharge shall be modeled or the discharge pipes shall directly tie-in to the MnDOT drainage system. 2. Plans must show the location and elevations of the Emergency Over -Flows (EOFs) on the project, specifically for Filtration Basin #1, #2, #4 and #5. 3. Plans must show the style of home for the twin homes. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 34 of 36 4. The stand-alone SWPPP document shall be submitted to the city for review with the final plat documents and will be required prior to any earth disturbing activities. 5. An NPDES construction permit must be granted to the applicant prior to any earth disturbing activities. 6. Stockpile locations shall be shown on the plans. 7. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 8. Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 9. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 10. If a wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier would be required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 1 I. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7- ton design. 12. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set. 13. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide and the parking spaces must be 18 feet long. 14. Pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. 15. The applicant shall obtain a LUP for the trail connection on MnDOT right-of-way. 16. All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city's requirements for public utilities. 17. The plan shall use 2017 Chanhassen standard detail plates, which are available on the city's website. 18. This parcel has paid the city for one (1) water and sanitary service hook-up. The additional twin home units (7) must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook-up fee at the time of final plat. The remaining hook-up fees would be paid with the building permit. 19. The hook-up fees for the main building are due with the building permit. 20. All work within the MnDOT right-of-way must be approved by MnDOT. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 35 of 36 21. This site will need to be compliant with the City of Chanhassen's MS4 permit. 22. The applicant's engineer will continue to work with the Watershed District to update their permit and meet requirements. 23. City staff will evaluate the design based on the requirements above until the city receives confirmation from the Watershed District that this project will be evaluated under a different requirement. The annual reduction by the proposed BMPs (Best Management Practices) are 67% removal for TSS and 60% removal for TP. This does not meet the requirements for TSS, so the design must be revised. The current design removes only 20% of the required 1.1" of impervious run-off volume. The design must be revised to meet the 1.1" volume removal. 24. The applicant shall evaluate the practicality of implementing, to the "maximum extent practicable," volume reducing practices including re -use. 25. The P8 model submitted shows an anticipated infiltration rate of 1.0"/hour, this is contrary to the MN Stormwater Manual's estimation for Type D soils: 0.06"/hour and shall be revised. 26. The construction plans shall include filtration basin cross sections and call out information about the iron filings. 27. The infiltrometer testing results for each basin shall be submitted to the city to verify the infiltration rate prior to release of the security for the filtration basins. 28. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. 29. In areas where storm water is directed to the basin through a catch basin, a sump manhole, at least three feet in depth should be used, four feet is recommended. 30. The plans shall label the sump catchbasins. 31. The proposed BMPs will be privately owned. 32. Erosion control blanket shall include the swales in their entirety. 33. The design of the stormwater BMPs shall follow the guidelines of the MN Stormwater Manual unless the City Engineer agrees to a deviation for those guidelines. 34. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. 35. Staff strongly recommends using plantings rather than seed, as seed can take up to three growing seasons to establish. The city will not release security until the vegetation is established. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 36 of 36 36. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. Planning Conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to improve the screening of the southwesterly portion of the site through the use of berming and landscaping. 2. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 3. The site is permitted one monument sign facing Great Plains Boulevard. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 4. Approval of the Site Plan application is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit (LUP) resolution and Final Plat Approval." 4. LIMITED USE PERMIT RESOLUTION: "The City Council approves the Limited Use Permit (LUP) resolution with MnDOT for a trail connection that requires grading within Highway 101 right-of-way with the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Limited Use Permit (LUP) is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Site Plan Permit and Final Plat Approval." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Application and Project Narrative. 3. Mission Hills PUD Ordinance. 4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. 5. Traffic Study dated July 14, 2016. 6. Letter from MnDOT dated April 6, 2017. 7. Letter from Carver County dated April 6, 2017. 8. Neighborhood Meeting Letter dated April 4, 2017. 9. Letter from Karla Thomsen dated October 28, 2014. 10. Letter from David Nickolay dated December 5, 2014. 11. Reduced plans dated received March 17, 2017. 12. Letter from Karla Thomsen dated April 13, 2017. 13. Email from MnDOT from Cameron Muhic regarding LUP 14. Resolution for a Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for a trail connection. GAPLAN\2017 Planning Cases\17-07 Mission Hills Senior living\Staff report 2017 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Mission Hills Senior Living for the following: 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards — Mission Hills. 2. Preliminary Plat to replat 8.64 acres into one lot — Mission Hills Yd Addition. 3. Site Plan Review for the construction of a 136-unit Senior Housing Facility with a Child Daycare Center and 8 Twin Homes — Mission Hills Senior Living, On April 18, 2017, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Mission Hills Senior Living for a Planned Unit Development Amendment, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan review (Planning Case 2017-07). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use, PUD-Mixed Use. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Mixed Use. 3. The legal description of the property is shown on the attached Exhibit A. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2. Lack of adequate roads. 3. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 6. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted. b) Consistency with this division. c) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas. 2 d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development. e) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community. 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping. 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses. 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 7. The planning report #2017-07, dated April 18, 2017, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development Amendment to the Mission Hills PUD, Preliminary Plat for Mission Hills and Addition, and Site Plan for Mission Hills Senior Living. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 18'h day of April, 2017. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION 1! "1 Its Chairman AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Sharmeen Al-Jaff City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Muhic, P Cameron (DOT) <cameron.muhic@state.mn.us> Wednesday, April 26, 2017 11:14 AM AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Sherman, Tod (DOT); Corbett, Michael J (DOT); Scheffing, Karen (DOT); Phelps, Daniel (DOT); Jacobson, Nancy (DOT) Follow up to Review on S17-022 Mission Hills Senior Living LU P_Sample-Resolution.docx SUBJECT: Mission Hills Senior Living MNDOT Review # S17-022 NE Quadrant of MN 101 (Great Plaines Blvd.) and US 212 Chanhassen, Carver County Dear Ms. Al-Jaff: This is in regards to the sidewalk connection requested in the site plan for the Mission Hills Senior Living development. You may remember that because the sidewalk/trail would be crossing into an area where MNDOT owns access control we were doing additional research into the requirements for the permits required. Dan Phelps, of MnDOT's Right -of -Way Department, says that he will need two Certified City Council resolutions similar to the Sample attached. He says he's worked with Todd Hoffman from the City of Chanhassen to get this in the past. Since the plans for the Application for Development have been reviewed by the functional units, we should not require a review of this LUP, so once we receive the two original certified city resolutions, he will be able assemble the documents for signatures. As a reminder -the following ADA requirements will apply to the sidewalk connection. ADA Statement: Curb ramps, sidewalks, trails, paths and transit stops or any other transportation facility must be compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Facilities on MNDOT right of way are required to meet MNDOT standards. Design requirements for MNDOT right of way can be found here httn://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/design.htm]. See also the U. S. Department of Justice web site: https://www.ada.2ov/2010ADAstandards index.htm Please contact Kristie Billiar, ADA Unit, at 651-366- 3174, if you have any questions regarding ADA thresholds or requirements. We also received an additional review in regards to this particular requirement. Nancy Jacobson of MnDOT's Metro Design department commented that she could not read the detail 3/C300, Bituminous path. Just to be clear the cross slope on all sidewalks/trails can be no greater than 2%. To ensure the construction of the path meets ADA requirements, she recommends that the construction plans cross slope does not exceed 1.5%. That way any minor variations in cross slope should remain within ADA requirements. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234-7797. Sincerely, Cameron Muhic Senior Planner - Multimodal Planning MnDOT Metro District 651-234-7797 Cameron.MuhicCastate.mn.us Copy sent via E-Mail: Nancy Jacobson, Design Dan Phelps, Right -of -Way RESOLUTION NO CITY OF _/ - LIMITED USE PERMIT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR A PEDESTRIAN TRAIL IN THE RIGHT- OF -WAY OF TRUNK HIGHWAY AT WHEREAS , - / the City of is a political subdivision, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of / has approved a plan to construct a pedestrian trail in the right -of way of Trunk Highway _ to promote the orderly and safe crossing of the highway; and, WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation requires a Limited Use Permit for the construction and utilization of said pedestrian trail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of / _ - hereby enters into a Limited Use Permit with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To construct, operate and maintain a pedestrian trail within the right- of- way of Trunk Highway _ (TH _ = _) of the State of Minnesota along . - / The City of shall construct, operate and maintain said trail in accordance with the Limited Use Permit granted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the _[Officer title 1_ and the _[Officer title 1_ are authorized to execute the Limited Use Permit and any amendments to the Permit. CERTIFICATION I certify that the above Resolution is an accurate copy of the Resolution adopted by the Board of Commissioners of _ County / City Council of the City of at an authorized meeting held on the day of 20. as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. this day of . 20_ Notary Public My Commission Expires (Signature) (Type - Print Name) (Title) NOTARY STAM i April 13, 2017 Sharmeen Al-Jaff Dear Ms. Al-Jaff: This letter is to request that the Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association, representing fifty-six homes on the west side of West 86t' Street, submit the following recommendations to the Planning Commission concerning the proposed development at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard. We request that copies of this letter be provided to the Commission prior to or at the public hearing on April 18, 2017. First, we fully support this type of development on this property and see it as an asset to our area of Chanhassen. Many of our senior homeowners will probably utilize the services offered at this new development. Our concerns are as follows: -That the median on West 86' Street be removed and redesigned -That the speed limit on Highway 101 and 8e St. be reduced to 35 MPH -That the traffic flowing out of the proposed development at night does not cast car lights into our homes Please take these concerns into consideration as plans are reviewed and this project is approved. Respectfully Submitted, Karla Thomson, President Mission Hills Garden Homeowner's Association COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF C�NHASSEN Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952)227-1300/Fax: (952)227-1110 0 'f L APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW r� Submittal Date: L ( �1 PC Date: 2-1 CC Date:.. 60-Day Review Date: 0 ('Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ([UP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence..$325 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑� Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑� Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 ❑ All Others .............................. ........................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 0 Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative..................................................$100 Commercial/Industrial Districts* ......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ( 9 thousand square feet) 'Include number of a iz sting employees: *Include dumber of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( 136 units) 0 Notification Sign (city to Install and remove) ..... ❑ Subdivision (SUB) El Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots.......................$600 + $15 per lot lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds(2lots)..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots ......................... ..................... $150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 Final Plat..........................................................$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)` 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed c mmntly, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. $200 ❑� Property Owners' List within 500' (city to generate after pre-appication meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( 114 addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑• Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 dots.) ❑ Easements( easements) 2,962.00 TOTAL FEE:Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Adding Day Care to the inside of the Mission Hills Senior Living Apartment Building Property Address or Location: Parcel #: Mission Hills Outlot E Legal Description: Hwy 101 and Hwy 212 Outlot E of the plat of Mission Hills, Carver County, Minnesota Total Acreage: 8.64 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No Present Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Q Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Q Present Land Use Designation: Mixed Q Requested Land Use Designation: Mixed 0 Existing Use of Property: Undeveloped ❑ Check box is separate narrative is attached. Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. Contact Eric Reiners Address: 4200 . Old Shakapee Rd Phone: (952) 996-9662 City/State/Zip: too ington, MN 55437 Cell: Email: enc@sra-mn.com Fax: (952) 996-9663 Signature: 6 Date: 3/16/17 PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC Contact: Michael Hoagberg Address: 17550 Hemlock Avenue Phone: (952) 378.4386 City/State/Zip: Lakeville, MN 55044 Cell: Email: mhoagberg@headwatersdevelopment.biz Fax: Signature: Date: 3/16/17 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all Information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific Ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: BKBM Contact: Keith Matte Address: 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Phone: (763) 843-0464 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55429 Cell: Email: kmatte@bkbm.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? `Other Contact Information: ❑� Property Owner Via: 0 Email Mailed Paper Copy Name: j] Applicant Via: ❑ Email Mailed Paper Copy Address: 21 Engineer Via: ❑ Email Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary forth fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital Copy to the City for processing (required). SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM 42DO W. Old Shakopee SKa Rd. #220 Bloomington, MN 55437 (952) srearms asmaas .�arnrta,,-,s nx. 996.9662 (952) 996.9663 - fax TRANSMITTAL TO: Sharmeen AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 FROM: Eric A. Reiners, AIA PROJECT NAME: _Mission Hills Senior Housing _PROJECT NO: 14-M DATE: 3/17/2017 The items below are transmitted: FOR YOUR INFORMATION F VIA: MAIL FOR YOUR REVIEW _ MESSENGER' n FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ PERSONAL DELIVERY1 FOR YOUR USE ❑X _ PICK4)P�� FOR YOUR RECORDS UPS- NEXT DAY�I AS REOUESTED DESCRIPTION: OTY. DATE REM DESCRIPTION 1 3/17/2017 Transmittal, City Application and Fee payment 7 3/17/2017 _ Full size drams and 8-1/7 x 11' copies of the following: — 3/17/2017 _ Project Narrative 3/17/2017 GeotechnicaI Evaluation Report 3/17/2017 Updated traffic study 3/17/2017 Proposed Lighting Cut Sheets AA, 88, CC, DD, EE, FF 3/17=17 Proposed HydroCAD Report 2/171oni7 Existing HydroCAD Report 3/17/2017 Hydrology Calculations 3/17/2017 MIDS Calculator Results 3/17/2017 Hydrology Report 3/17/2017 Architectural site and building plans, site lighting, landscape 3/17/2017 Civil engineering plan, grading, drainage and utilities COMMENTS: --- -— CC: Mike Hoagberg & Greg Zoidis - Headwaters Development Susan Farr & Jill Nokleby Kaiser - Ebenezer Jeff Engelsma - Engelsma Construction SR _a_ sPERIDES REINERS ARCRInP.CM INC. March 171' 2017 Transmittal Re: City of Chanhassen Mission Hills Senior Living Submittal Submitted on March 171h 2017 (7) full size and (1) 8.5"xll" of the following (1) digital copy of the proposal on CD 81/2" X 11" Originals Application for Development Review Form (with Check for fees) Geotechnical Evaluation Report Proposed HydroCAD Report Existing HydroCAD Report Proposed Lighting Cut Sheets AA, BE, CC, DD, EE, FF Project Narrative Hydrology Calculations MIDS Calculator Results Hydrology Report 30"x42" Sheets A0.0 TITLE SHEET PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE SURVEY C100 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C200 UTILITY PLAN C300 PAVING AND GEOMETRIC PLAN C301 TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT PLAN C400 CIVIL DETAILS SHEET C401 CIVIL DETAILS SHEET C500 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN Al.1 SITE PLAN A1.2 MONUMNET SIGN DETAILS, PATIO GARDEN FENCE DETAILS A1.3 LANDSCAPE PLAN, INSTALLATION DETAILS, PLANTING SCHEDULE A1.4 PLANTING PROFILES, RAIN GARDEN DIAGRAM, ENLARGED PLANS A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.10 CAMPUS VIEWS A3.11 CAMPUS VIEWS A3.20 TOWNHOME VILLA VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS A3.21 TOWNHOME VILLA DESIGN OPTIONS M SITE PHOTOMETRICS MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST C HANHASSEN, M NNESOTA mom M�SaVI IP' RM wM 1Gf TYII Rfas \/ ! %AA9&0N HILLS 3FD ADDITION c R Too 0 --^-^-.r.�r mm awgEgo fit 10 ih - r LL' OCX I � � � � tsu.`L'ti.-ate••'.-- _ .�:. <- 4 /I11L ---------- _ _ 'Jrrro,war wxm A::OO FY411 OF ^:A. o IDo ri Kf...II.rw bOuus�iY 5 �sr o3�a8r=ti v m <. /%*WYAR ffi r •.��LS�B�t�C�--� �CLT�e ©L0A!'EM® ="Ow=® m�omam� mmom=® mm===RM� yh�l ryPPi 1 ��i�J?if JJi aaaddaaa++ a n •I• r, !� 4 r _ff, TM,W ?M'AY/ = � eo as x+.n bFbm frnlrvCx wn rn nn wnmrn. :no a�xv Mr. : rnx /NINCNf)MYAYM] M F2i M TU IAWFAEM PLW C301 i__4AT.S,�1. I 1V n �I R irievi�snnwaa wi Y sa i — ht wi e „ 'Ik !s -- „ 'Ik !s -- i wi Aw M r r L i wi �r wi FOO 2 weq►Y_ cti=-', ate___ , 3zvrc:- rrrzr SOMEONE .111 _�.Y 1 m��oic�,��.uu on.� ��� �---_� %�fI1C ��1p IBLL fALM WORi Own milmilmam x r i j B1�16m uicC nIM �L JR OYCN •D wwvl4 M �{ it �POMi >I Ii+P .t ii.ci� Y !� a a4M. MS I •- i -�.1 � a /_.-#-___ a -T �-- i. ��. i iliii A ii� P. 1..1 i� it .. i.G��iIGGi:r�GGi i � •-wit iL--6G si• i In A3.0 I.. r Il._—v:- - �ilfY YbOl a.rfl _. adJ•r n�.. �l■: IS { ■ !lilt UNN na •• �i �,.� A3.2 VFn Li SrtE %RLM THE M.W FNTRY ORNE V�'IH►MC NCMVMY l01 JIST PAST SQMO ✓MLL Vp� pP Sfl! PRQI TE (QIVaI GP E6TN SiItEEf YCST AND NIGNYNY 101 N J All G tiRmL vise='c v ' 4AM BJLDMG ENTitY VE5"614f ANp pRNE UIOHE GINGT' AERML V FRGM NCR1NFl£iT Ek G[� tA G V IEIY G HAM MCNU T 51GN A 6 HI HNAY .O' D N'� RM 11E 01 N RM Q AlMl1?f NIA �3 p @ p O 4 �_� wires 9� ICNf 9kVNCN D NW IUVIdnM MlB�O wTNIb+'E VLLn 6$W4 U• p �Nr e`ss SCffItVN W 9kvNYN A�- A3.Q0 PROJECT SITE DATA Parcel Basics The existing site is currently an undeveloped, 8.64 acre parcel identified as Mission Hills Third Addition. The property is bounded by Trunk Highway 101 to the west, Trunk Highway 212 to the south, 86`" Street West on the north, and Mission Hills Outlot B with previously developed townhomes to the east. Project Land Use Data The project site falls under the Chanhassen Mixed -Use guiding (Commercial/Residential), and the Mission Hills PUD Neighborhood Commercial zoning, and was unanimously approved for the development of Mission Hills Senior Living by the Planning Commission and the City Council in February of 2015. Additionally, this resubmittal and application specifically requests the approval of a child daycare on -site. The proposed daycare is to be accommodated within the footprint of the main housing structure and occupies approximately 8,600SF. The daycare provides child care for up to 90 children. Under the permitted residential land use for the parcel, residential density calculations as provided by Planning Staff, is comprised of 16 allowable residential units per acre across the 7.72 net site acres (123.5 units), plus 33 total residential units of un-used unit density from the original Mission Hills PUD development. The result is a total allowable zoned site density of 156 residential units. Mission Hills PUD does not specifically govern parking, hardcover, setbacks or building heights and these components of the proposed development will be guided by the city's underlying district guidelines. City ordinance requires one parking space for every three assisted living units, plus parking for visitors and staff. Refer to the matrix below for a parking summary illustrating required and provided parking. Parking Required Provided Independent Living Unit 1 per townhouse unit = 16 16 Assisted Living Unit 1 for every 3 assisted unit = 46 84 136 total Assisted Living Units Staff (maximum shift) 1 per employee = 24 33 Child -Care 1 for every 6 children of 15 design capacity of 90 children Guests & Visitors 38 TOTAL PARKING 101+Visitors 186 The site will have a total of 86 surface parking spaces for staff and visitors. This is comprised of 75 spaces directly in front of the main building, and 11 spaces for town home guests. The main building will also have 84 underground parking spaces, and the town home villas will have 16 individual garage stalls bringing the site total to 186 parking spaces. In addition, the driveways leading to each of the town homes has been planned with a minimum length of twenty feet to accommodate additional parking directly in front of each unit if required. Since most of our residents are not expected to drive, we expect many of our employees will park under the main building which will leave surface spaces for visiting friends and relatives. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT DATA Program The site will be developed and finished to accommodate a 136-unit, senior housing structure whose primary focus will be to provide independent living, assisted living and memory care apartments to senior citizens together with a full continuum of care allowing the residents to comfortably age in place, while supported by the full range of additional services provided by Ebenezer, the facility operator. In addition, there will be a 6 classroom and 1 infant room childcare center on the first floor of the housing structure. Ebenezer has had great success in programming and providing for inter -generational care at the Ebenezer Ridges Campus in Burnsville. To quote the Ebenezer Ridges Inter -Generational program description: This innovative program provides day care for young children and includes interaction with participants in an adult day program for seniors. Something magical happens every day at the Ebenezer Intergenerational Day Program when the young and the old spend time together. As they help each other and learn from one another, an unmistakable bond forms that rises above differences in age and ability. Building on Ebenezer's faith -based heritage, our intergenerational program helps bridge the generation gap. Children learn respect for older adults and compassion for their physical limitations. older adults maintain self-worth by sharing their lives and experiences. Children bring life, spirit and joy to seniors on the campus, keeping them young at heart. The attention and encouragement of seniors helps children flourish. Ebenezer Ridges Intergenerational Program received national recognition two years in a row. The 2009 Generations United Shared Site Award and the 2010 Generations United/MetUfe Foundation Intergenerational Shared Site Excellence Award recognize excellence in bringing generations together. Additionally, the site will contain eight (8) twin homes, adding sixteen more independent living units to the development. These single story twin homes will be located on the north end of the site and closest to the site entrance and West 861' Street. Total planned residential units on site will remain at 152 - the same as defined in the 2015 project approvals. The site will include a series of amenities for the residents as well. These amenities include patios, gardens, and walking paths. The walking paths will connect to the central site circulation as well as the public sidewalk along west 86t" Street that was developed as a part of the original Mission Hills development P.U.D. Site The existing site is currently undeveloped, roughly graded for agricultural use, and contains only volunteer vegetation with the exception of its boundary with the town home property to the east, which is densely planted. Many of the mature volunteer trees along the east and north boundaries of the site will be preserved as a part of the final development plan. Under this development plan, however, the site will be re -graded to accommodate the planned building and necessary infrastructure and construction. Impervious surface coverage for this site was not redefined in the original P.U.D. and thus, the city ordinance for this development type will govern, limiting hardcover to 50% and requiring a minimum of 50% green space. As illustrated in the summary matrix below and the summary tables on the Civil Engineering sheets in the submittal set, the green space requirement is met. Developed property area: 376,546 SF 8.644 Acres Building footprints: 81,255 SF 1.865 Acres Total impervious surface area: 179,903 SF 4.13 Acres 47.80% of Site Total green surface area: 196,456 SF 4.51 Acres 52.20% of Site Engineering and Utilities Project civil engineers, BKBM Engineers, together with city engineering staff have worked closely in preliminary stages to accommodate and properly configure the building development, site coverage and storm water management, as well as the requisite utility connections. Storm water management plan, including collection, treatment, infiltration, rate control and discharge are fully explained and detailed within the submittal drawings. These components of the site design are substantially unchanged from the designs that were approved by the city and watershed in 2015, but have been modified and updated to reflect the changes required by the introduction of the child daycare program. Building Design The main building will be a four-story wood frame structure over a concrete and precast basement — a structural configuration and height implemented elsewhere in Chanhassen at developments such as SummerWood of Chanhassen located just north of this proposed development site. The basement level will house utility, storage and inside parking functions for the structure. The ground floor will welcome residents and visitors through the main entrance with a covered drop-off and house most of the building's public spaces. These include commercial kitchen and dining rooms, and connection to the rest of the development amenities. Ground floor will also encompass the primary health care functions, guest suite, a closed 28-suite memory care wing, and nine of the assisted living apartment units will be on the first level. The child day-care is also housed on the first floor with direct connections to the exterior playground. All of the functions of the child day-care are contained on the first -floor east wing of the building. These include 6 classrooms, 1 infant room, support spaces and an intergenerational room that connects from the child day-care to the activity area of the adult housing. Levels two and three will contain another 65 resident apartments varying in size from 514 SF studios to 1,224 SF, two -bedroom, two -bath residences. Selected residences are provided with balconies and other unit amenities. Each floor also contains spaces for health care attendants, and common area functions such as laundry (to supplement washer/ dryers available in most units). Level four will house the final 34 residential units. Once again, a cross-section of larger units are provided with balconies to take advantage of wonderful views over the surrounding areas. The fourth level also provides additional resident common areas, a library that overlooks the entire site, and out toward Lake Susan to the northwest. Exterior building materials will be masonry and painted siding, and the structure will have sloped shingle roofs. Gutters and downspouts will discharge on grade and into catch basins that will flow through storm water treatment areas —on grade and/or below grade —prior to exiting the site. Once again, storm water management plan, including collection, treatment, infiltration, rate control and discharge are fully explained and detailed within the submittal civil drawings. The twin home villas will capture some of the details from the main building creating an aesthetic synthesis of building components across the site, and each individual independent twin home will contain approximately 1,186 finished square feet, plus the single inside garage stall. Miscellaneous Building Components Mechanical screening as required by city ordinance is very limited as most of the mechanical systems are contained within the structure. Limited screening, where required, will be achieved by roof screens designed to coordinate with the building architecture. Site trash enclosure is not illustrated in the development plan and will not be used. Interior trash rooms are utilized in the facility plan, dumpsters will be rolled out on collection days, and back inside to trash rooms following pick up. Site deliveries, move-in/move-out, and building service including trash collection are all achieved on the southwest corner of the building and site at the building's lower level. This service entry point and its access drive are the most remote from neighboring residents and away from all neighborhood traffic and views. Traffic Studv A traffic study was completed by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. The main objectives of this study were to review existing operations within the study area, evaluate the traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network, and recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development. Furthermore, this study also provided a comparison between the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, and those associated with the maximum potential traffic demand under the proposed zoning, which is assumed to be market rate apartments. Results of the year 2017 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable range or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the proposed development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements are not required under year 2017 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. An alternative land use scenario was also reviewed to understand the impacts of the highest intensity use allowed under the proposed zoning, which was assumed to be market rate apartments. Approximately 175 apartment units were assumed, which would be expected to generate approximately 89 a.m. peak hour, 109 p.m. peak hour, and 1,164 daily trips. Even under this scenario, results of the year 2017 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating within an acceptable range or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under the alternate development scenario. In addition, once again under this heightened use scenario, no significant side - street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the alternate development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements would not be required under year 2017 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. SRF Consulting updated their traffic study from the 2015 approvals process to include the proposed daycare program and traffic use. Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the field or traffic simulation at the study intersections. FACILITY OPERATIONS Ebenezer- Proposed Operator The proposed operator of our senior housing community is Ebenezer which is an affiliate of the Fairview Health System. This affiliation with Fairview provides substantial programmatic support and care options for community residents. We expect rapid change in senior care over the next 5 — 10 years as senior housing continues to evolve from a focus on simply housing and hospitality to a more integrated delivery of medical and social care. We believe Ebenezer will be our best option to provide high quality care alternatives for our residents. Ebenezer currently operates our 115-unit senior housing community in Saint Louis Park (Towerlight on Wooddale) and is the proposed operator for the 137-unit senior housing community we are building in Eagan which recently received final city approvals. Ebenezer is the second largest provider of senior living in Minnesota, and had $72.7 million of total operating revenue in 2013. Ebenezer operates 60 communities and manages more than 5,000 units throughout its portfolio in Minnesota. The portfolio includes Independent Living Communities, Assisted Living Communities, Memory Care Communities, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Transitional Care Centers, Adult Day Programs, and Child Care Programs. For more than 90 years, Ebenezer has helped older adults make their lives more independent, healthful, meaningful and secure by creating opportunities for residents to live vibrantly, and participate in the daily fabric of life. The City of Chanhassen Public Benefits of Senior Housing & Child Care A Day Care Center in an Assisted -Living Facility Consider Ebenezer Ridges Day Care Center in Burnsville, Minn. This nondescript establishment is recognized locally as the preeminent program for toddlers and has o waiting list that befits its status, despite a small nonprofit budget. To what does Ridges attribute its success? The center became special when it decided to move inside an assisted -living facility. Now, the kids have daily access to surrogate grandparents to teach and support them. Trent Stamp, Next Avenue Contributor to Forbes SEPT. 26, 2016 The proposed senior community will benefit the public by providing senior housing for the area so that seniors who have spent their lives in Chanhassen and the surrounding communities remain in the area. Many local seniors will be attracted by the health benefits of a senior housing community as an attractive alternative to the isolation of living alone and the burden of maintaining a home. The proposed facility will help to meet the current housing needs of seniors in the immediate area (several neighbors are on senior housing waiting lists), while also helping to meet the anticipated needs of unmet demand in the nearfuture as projected by a recent independent market study. Senior Living is a great community partner— not only creating a place where people come to volunteer, but also housing people who are interested in contributing back to their surrounding community. Senior Housing residents participate in local churches, volunteer opportunities, and engage in the greater community. Senior Housing, and specifically the programs and activities promoted by Ebenezer, also support local economic development since seniors typically prefer to shop in their familiar community. In addition, Ebenezer brings stable, high quality jobs to the communities in which they operate. There is also no better neighbor than a senior citizen. They are light on the land, streets and park systems, yet senior communities create significant tax base without burdening infrastructure and school systems. Ebenezer prefers larger senior housing communities like the proposed Mission Hills Senior Living since operational efficiencies are gained through larger senior housing developments when compared to smaller ones. Some of the operating benefits of a larger building are listed below: L A larger facility can afford to offer a broader range of healthcare services, options, and amenities to Chanhassen seniors while limiting disruptive moves from one facility to another for additional care. ii. Creating a larger pool of care staff helps to support stable services for our residents. More hours of care and therefore staffing can be offered to provide more consistent employment, rather than a lot of part-time positions that are more difficult to fill with qualified care givers. This is expected to be increasingly important if the current shortage of qualified nurses continues, as we expect, as our population ages. iii. A larger building allows for more competitive wages and benefits at all levels of staff which typically translates to better care for our residents. iv. A larger facility offers more apartment options, which reduces the chance that families have to split up (i.e. one spouse needs Memory Care and the other can live in an Independent Unit, all under one roof) Additionally, this type of project also provides the public benefit of encouraging a tumover of single family housing in the area. When seniors move into these communities, neighborhoods typically experience younger families moving into the formerly senior owned housing stock which helps to revitalize these neighborhoods. Finally, in addition to construction jobs, Mission Hills Senior Living is expected to employ many people on site as care is provided to our residents 24 hours a day. The building is projected to employ over 50 individuals (FTEs) in a combination of full and part time positions. Mission Hills Senior Living Center and the City of Chanhassan 2030 Comprehensive Plan Following guidance from the City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan; the Mission Hills Senior Living Center addresses the Main Goal of: Achieving a mixture of development which will assure a high quality of life and a reliable tax goal: base. The Mission Hills Senior Living Center also accommodates and supports many of the policies that support the Main Goal of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, including: The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide for a full range of housing opportunities. These opportunities require that adequate land be designated for medium and high -density land uses to ensure that the goal of housing diversity can be met regardless of temporary market fluctuations. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by amending the Mission Hills Planned Unit Development Design Standards in its entirety as follows: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the commercial development shall comply with the Neighborhood Business District, BN. ply with the R-12, H b. Permitted Uses rhur- t,es a a efmit4 d „ e in the e :al area of this distiet. The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: • Single Family Residential • Medium Density Residential • High Density Residential with a Child Daycare Center C. Setbacks In the PUT) standards, the buildin setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The High De parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of- way and/or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the � High Densid portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Commercial Residential Residential Commercial Street Parking Parking Building Setback* Building Setback Setback Setback* Highway 101 * 50' 20' Hi wa 212 * 50' 20' West 80b Street * 30' 20' O'(from commercial) 0' (from commercial) Interior Lot Lines 50' from residential 0' 0' 35' from residential * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 91b Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 10"' Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 11`" Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12's Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; Mission Hills 2°d Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet 376,358.4 squs Widtic 480 feet Depth: 620 f BLOCK USE Net Lot Density Hard Surface Area Coverage Eetnmereial 1�3ission 02 Multi -Family Child Daycare edition en Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi -Family 18 acres 7.66 37% Units Block 4, Mission Hills 56 Multi -Family Units 8.92 acres 6.28 43.2% 2 RESIDENTIAL Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. 6. The aparjMW9Mg locM on _ shah a. Have Aftnounced entrance. b. Insure that all foundation walls are Sid _ IM111111JINNFretaining walls. c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2'%, inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f. Signage LOMMERCIAL One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard'sLall be:INMed for Lot 1, BINk 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition. " be f3ofmitted coutleta one iffienumePA sign r _ th 1 n wait:. ^ ^• Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 4 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within ddition the outlet may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. g. Lighting All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8' day of May, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenberger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on April 6, 2017 the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of a request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center on 8.64 acres of property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills) to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other Subsc 'bed and sworn to before me this (V day of , , 2017. N ary Public records. Kim T. Meuwissen, Deputy �. JENNIFER ANN PI�TTER 1 Notary PubAc•Minneaota `"�81 My commwww E,�yn s1. zQto Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center. Applicant: Sperides Reiners Architects Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff Questions & by email at saijaff(cD.ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEW1 Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Ravi. Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezomngs, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a Public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 50) feel of the subject Site to W notified of Me application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request Al the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview, of the report and a recommendation. The item will be waned for the public to speak about the proposal as a pan of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reveres, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Retionings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except re2IXlings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/Industral. • Minnesota State Statute 51999 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant worries this standard Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting • A neighborhood spokememon/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for Me city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person i. • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will ba included in the report to the City Council. 11 you wish to have something to be included in the report. lease witted the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evenin , depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center. Applicant: Sparkles Reiners Architects, Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard. Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.c!.chanhassen.mirl 017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff Questions & by email at saljaff(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Ravi" Procedure: • Subdivisions. Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Weiland Alterations, Rouonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property, within Sold feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in whibmg. Any interested Perry is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of Me report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pan of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to Me City Council, The City Counal may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Recumings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except razonings and land use amendments from residential to comrnerdal(IndusVlal. • Minnesota Slate Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for Me City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersM/repree9ntative Is encouraged to provide a contact fort" city. Often developers are encouraged to most with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Slott is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. ff you wish to have ushering to be induced in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. PID Taxpayer Name Taxpayer Address Taxpayer City -State -Zip Property Address Property City -State -Zip 255320050 ANDREW B SANVICK 582 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 582 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320520 ANDREW J BRONCZYK 311 WINKLE R CT COLOGNE, MN_55322-4510 __ 546 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320270 ANNE M SAMUELSON 583 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 583 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320460 ANNE M SUDDENDORF 525 MAR_S_HLAND TRL _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 525 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250830080 APPLE TREE ESTATES LLC 545 LAKE D_APT 205 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9323 , MN 255310050 ARDIS M OLUFSON ILLR 565 MISSION HS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 565 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310080 BARBARA J WELLUMSON 577 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 577 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310200 BERNARD M & JOANN C GAYTKO _ 521 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 521 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310190 BEVERLY E CHRISTENSEN 517 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 _ 517 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310220 BEVERLY HAFFNER 509 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 509 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310140 BONNIE JEAN THURK 537 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 ,537 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250135300 BRAD H & CAROL M WILLMSEN 8510 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9749 8510 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320390 BRETT WEIGEL 576 BLACKBIRD CT _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7703 576 BLACKBIRD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250242420 BRIAN & LOUANN KLINGELHUTZ 9731 MEADOWLARK IN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8626 8601 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 252930010 BRIAN A & LOU ANN D KLINGELHUT 8860 KLEIN DR WACONIA, MN 55387-4566 760 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 _ 255310560, BURTON BRANDRUD 584 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 584 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317_ _ 255310100 CAROL K GELDERT 557 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 557 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310120 CAROL L ERICKSON 549 MISSION HILLS DR -- CH, M_N 55317-7716 ANHASSEN 549 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320040 CAROL R VENEZIA S86 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 586 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2553004101 CARVER COUNTY 602 4TH ST E CHASKA, MN 55318-2102 , MN 252930020, CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PLACE LLC PO BOX 10 ALBANY, MN 56307.0010 721 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320340 CHRIS & ALANNA UEBHART051 VENEZIA TER CHINO HILLS, CA 91709-6610 559 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310510 CONNIE M MOEHL 8540 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN_55317-7719 8540 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320240 COREY ALLEN MILLER 589 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, _MN 55317-7702 589 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310330 DALE E HETLAND 524 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 524 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320250IDAVID B & ALLISON C_O_RFIELD 587 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHAN_HASSEN, MN 55317-7702 587 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 25------- DAVID F NICKOLAY 552 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN,. MN 55317-7716 552 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310060�1 DEBRA J MCGARRY 569 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, _MN 55317-7716 569 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255330550' DENNIS R & DIANE E SIEFKER REV 588 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 588 MISSION HILLS DR ICHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255330440 DIANE M DEPOE 548 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 548 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -- 2553201901DONNA LEVASSEUR 599 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 _ 599 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320580 DREW D CARLSON 531 MISSIONS HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 _ 531 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317__ 255310390 DUANE D & DONNA M MOORE 536 MISSION HILLS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 _ 536 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 553_17 255320290 EDWARD MILLER 579 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 579 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN $5317 255320220 ERIC J BORM 6972 PIMA LN _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9230 593 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320130 ERIC W & MEGAN E TEALE 550 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 550 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310110. ERWIN C & CLARA MAE SIDER 553 MISSION HILLS DR _ CHANHA55EN, MN 55317-7716 553 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250135510�i FREDERICK Q KAMPS 8410 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8698 8410 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2578700201GARY R SCHULTZ 8507 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9749 8507 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250134600'GEORGE W & LESLIE GILMAN 7470 ATHERTON WAY EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346-4410 8506 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN_ 55317 255320210 GORDON G WAINWRIGHT 595 MISSION HILLS WAY W _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 595 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 _ 2553101801 GRACE REGALADO _ 525 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHA55EN, MN 55317-7715 525 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250134900GREGORY A & DANA J OHNSORG 8500 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9749 8500 WATERS EDGE DR _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320370 GREGORY A MARTELL 568 BLACKBIRD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7703 568 BLACKBIRD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310230 GREGORY SELLS 3808 DOTTY ST CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-2715 505 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310370 HARTIN FAMILY TRUST 540 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 540 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320570 HEATHER HEYER 3526 GRIMES AVE N MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422-2838 535 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320200 HEATHER L TRIMBLE 597 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 597 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320090 HEATHER M RUDNICKI 561 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 561 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320540; HEATHER S VALITON 547 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 1547 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320150[ HEIDI L BUCKENTINE _ 558 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.7702 558 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320430 HOUCK INVESTMENTS LLC 776 APPLEWOOD CIR VICTORIA, MN 55386.8254 537 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310090 HOWARD M LONGPRE 561 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.7716 561 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN,_MN 55317 255310520 1 A & JUDITH A HRUBY 8544 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 8544 MAYFIELD M CT CHANHASSEN, N 55317 255320320 JANE M VANDEN PLAS 567 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 567 MISSION HILLS WAY W _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2553102401 JANET E BROWN 501 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 501 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 25531OS40' JARED A KRUEGER 596 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7717 596 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320400 JAY ANDREW ELLIOT 639 SPRINGHILL RD SAINT PAUL, MN 55127-3598 580 BLACKBIRD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 257870010JEFFREY RAYMOND SICHENEDER 8508 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9749 8508 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320450'JENNIFER YOUNGS 529 MARSHLAND TRL #45 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 529 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310490 JOCELYNE RYAN 576 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.7716 576 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250135000 !JOHN F & SHIRLEY M ROBINSON 8502 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 8502 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250136400 1 JOHN S & BARBARA A JACOBY 8516 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9749 8516 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320360JONATHAN M SCHLUETER 564 BLACKBIRD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7703 564 BLACKBIRD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320140 JULIE A STOLL 554 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 554 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANH_ASSE_N, MN 55317 255320180 JULIE LJORGENSON 570MISSION HILLS WAV _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 570 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320440 KAREN J CWAYNA DOUGHERTY 533 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 533 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310450 KARLA K THOMSON 8524 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 8524 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310130 KATHY J MCKIM 533 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 533 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 25532C 90i KELLEY P BENTLEY 534 MISSION HILLS W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.7701 534 MISSION HILLS WAY W ''CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320550 KELLIE L WEILBRENNER 543 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 r543 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -- -- - S 255320380 KENNA PROPERTIES LLC 1096 SYMPHONY LN ICHASKA, MN 55318-4589 572 BLACKBIRD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250135500, KENNETH J & GARNITA A WENCL 8412 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN,N_M55317-8698 8412 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 ASS 255320080 KIM M FEIST 565 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 565 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255300400 KLINGELHUTZ FARMS LLC 545 LAKE DR APT #205 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9323 , MN 255310530 LAUREL J BOSECK 592 MISSION HILLS DR _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 592 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 _ I 255310020 LENORE J MOLSTAD 589 MISSIONM _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 589 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317255310150 LYNETTE LAABS 541 MISSION CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 541 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN55317 255320310 MANEESH BHAGAT 125MAIN STMINNEAPOUS, MN 55414-2161 571 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320560I MARIE L & JEAN E ANDERSON 539 MISSIONY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 539 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320230, MARY MILLER 591 MISSIONY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 591 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310380 MATTHEW L &KATHLEEN ALBRECHT 6220 CASCACHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9476 544 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320280 MATTHEW R KLEY 3136 3RD AVMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408-3221 581 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 755310460 MATTHEW S RUDDYJR 8520 MAYFICHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 8520 MAY CT _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310500 MICHAEL S & STEPHANIE R DILLE 291 TIMBER HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9129 580 MISSION HILLS DR I CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310570 MISSION HILLS GARDEN HOMES 2681 LONG LAKE RD ROSEVILLE, MN 55113-1128 , MN 255320170 NAILAA OUALLEN 566 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.7702 _ 566 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320530 NAM T NGUYEN 551 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN_55317-7701 551 MISSION HILLS WAY W _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320030 NANCY J GOLLING _ 590 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 590 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250135100 NORMAN C JR & KIMBERLY GRANT I}9021 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317--8650 8504 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310170 PAMELA R MURRAY - 1529 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 529 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2553203301 PATRICIA STRUCK 563 MISSION WAY W CHANHASSEN,. MN 55317-7702 563 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310400 PATRICK A HUTTNER _H_ILLS 532 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN,_MN 55317-7715 532 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310470 PATRICK 5 & CONSTANCE SULLIVAN 8500 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 8500 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2553205001 PHYLLIS J RILEY 538 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 538 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310040 RENEE D WALSTROM 581 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 581 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310420 RICHARD & EVELYN 1 KETTLER 8521 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 8521 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310210 ROBERT C & SUSAN J E_RIC_KSON 513 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 513 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2553200701ROBERT J BAUER 569 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7711 569 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320350RODNEY A FERROZZO 560 BLACKBIRD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7703 560 BLACKBIRD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320020 RYAN L MAAS 594 MISSION HILLS WAY .CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 594 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320480 SAMANTHA BOLAND 530 MISSION HILLS WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 530 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320120 SEAN S WARK 549 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 549 MARSHLAND TRL _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 250242412 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT _ 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRAN 5T PAUL, MN 55155-1801 _ MN 255320410 STEPHANI K THYKESON 545 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 545 MARSHLANDTRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320110 STEPHEN W JONES 1R 553 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 553 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310410 SUSAN M DEAN 8525 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 8525 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310160. THOMAS H BERGE 545 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 545 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320060 TIMOTHY B LAMBERT 578 MISSION HILLS WAY_ W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 578 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310480'TRUST OF DOROTHY S JAMES 8501 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 8504 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320300 URBAN CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC 5421 TRACY LYNN TERR MIN_NET_ONKA, MN 55345-4237 575 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320160 VALERIE LUEBKE 562 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHA_NH_ASSEN, MN 55317-7702 562 _MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2553205101VI QUANG 542 MISSION HILLS WAY_ W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 542 MISSION HILLS WAY_W_ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310360 VICKIE L NOVAK 516 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 516 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320260 VICTORIA L OLENDER -- 585 MISSION HILLS WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 585 MISSION HILlS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310070 VIOLA MARIE COLLINGHAM LIVING 573 MISSION HILLS CHA_NHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 573 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310030 VIRGINIA A WELLUMSON -DR.- _ 585 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 585 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255310010WAYNE L BEAN 593 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 593 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 2553200101 WILLIAM D HEINRICH JR 598 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 598 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 255320420 ZETTEL INVESTMENTS LLC _ 19580 VINE RIDGE RD _ EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9118 541 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 ENGINES ERIS ��,�� PLANNE I DESIGNERS Consulting Group, Inc. To, Michael Hoagberg Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC From: Jordan Schwarze, PE, Senior Engineer Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Date: July 14, 2016 Subject: Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Introduction Memorandum 911320I1DSGfM4011 Due to site plan revisions, SRF has completed an update to the Cbanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study (dated 12/21/2014) for the proposed development located near the TH 212/County Highway 101 interchange (see Figure 1). The main objectives of this study are to review the revised site plan with regard to trip generation, access, and circulation. The updated study will include an evaluation of the potential need to improve the County Highway 101/86th Street intersection traffic control. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and study conclusions offered for consideration. Existing Conditions The existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline in order to identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes peak period intersection turning movement counts, field observations, and an intersection capacity analysis. Data Collection Peak period turning movement counts were collected by SRF during the week of October 27, 2014 for the Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study at the following intersections: • County Highway 101 and Lake Susan Drive/TH 212 Westbound Ramps • County Highway 101 and 86th Street Note. 861b Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection volumes were derived from the Count,Higbway 101/ 86tb Street intersection turning movement counts and surrounding land use trip generation estimates. The collected year 2014 data was modified based on historical traffic volume trends in the vicinity of the proposed development to reflect existing year 2016 conditions. It should be noted that historical annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes within the study area were provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). ONE CARISON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 1 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 1 763.475.0010 1 W W WSRFCONSULTING.COM \,:�v ti - .r Michael Hoagbe% Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC July 14, 2016 Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Page 3 Field observations were completed to identify roadway characteristics within the study area (i.e. roadway geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls). Currently, County Highway 101 is a four -lane divided roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour (mph). 86th Street is a two-lane undivided roadway with no posted speed limit and parking allowed only along the north side. The study intersections are side -street stop controlled, except the County Highway 101/ Lake Susan Drive intersection which is signalized. It should be noted that County Highway 101 is functionally classified as a minor arterial, while other study roadways are classified as local streets. Existing geometrics, traffic controls, and volumes within the study area are shown in Figure 2. Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis An existing intersection capacity analysis was completed to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations could be compared. The study intersections were analyzed using Synchro/ SimTraffic software (V9.1). Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS) which indicates how well an intersection is operating. Intersections are ranked from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 1. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, while LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. Overall intersection LOS A though LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Table L Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections LOS Designation Signalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle(seconds) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle(seconds) A 510 <_ 10 8 >10-20 >10-15 C >20-35 >15-25 D >35-55 >25-35 E >55-80 >35-50 F > 80 > 50 For side -street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side -street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side -street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high levels of delay (ie, poor levels of service) on the side -street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. V ON I Existing Conditions Figure 2 n,.Il.n, (..... . Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update 0148676.01 Chanhassen, MN July 2016 Michael Hoagberg, Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC July 14, 2016 Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Page 5 Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 2 indicate that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the field or traffic simulation at the study intersections. It should be noted that all results shown represent the SitnTraffic analysis due to the proximity of the County Highway 101/Lake Susan Drive signalized intersection and its impact on operations at the County Highway 101/86th Street intersection. Table 2. Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay County Highway 101/1-ake Susan Drive B 12 sec. B 17 sec. County Highway 101/86th Streetlll A/B 13 sec. A/B 10 sec. 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive(') A/A 3 sec. A/A 2 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Year 2019 No Build Conditions To help determine impacts associated with the proposed development, traffic forecasts were first developed for year 2019 no build conditions (i.e. one year after anticipated completion). The no build conditions take into account general area background growth and traffic generated by adjacent developments, if any. The evaluation of year 2019 no build conditions includes details on the adjacent development, traffic forecasts, and an intersection capacity analysis. Adjacent Development Based on discussions with City staff, the Preserve at Rice Lake development is expected to be complete prior to the proposed development. The Preserve at Rice Lake is located north of TH 212, near the eastern terminus of 86th Street (see Figure 3: Adjacent Development). This adjacent development will consist of 16 single-family homes and is currently under construction. Motorists traveling to/from the Preserve at Rice Lake would primarily be expected to utilize 86th Street, though Mission Hills Lane could also be utilized to access northbound County Highway 101. Adjacent development trips were estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Ninth Edition. These trips were distributed throughout the area based on the directional distribution shown in Figure 4, which was developed based on existing travel patterns within the area and engineering judgment. Results of the trip generation estimates shown in Table 3 indicate that the adjacent development is expected to generate approximately 12 a.m. peak hour, 16 p.m. peak hour, and 152 daily trips. W ION I Adjacent Development Figure 3 --- „.F(-up. Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Chanhassen, MN 0148676.01 July 2016 V ION I Directional Distribution Figure 4 < m F <.r..p m,. Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update 0148676.01 Chanhassen, MN July 2016 Michael Hoagberg, Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Table 3. Trip Generation Estimates - Adjacent Development Land Use Type (ITE Code) Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Year 2019 No Build Traffic Forecasts A.M. Trips Size In I Out 16 Dwelling Units July 14, 2016 Page 8 P.M. Trips Daily In Out Trips 10 6 152 To determine the general area background growth rate, historical AADT volumes and the forecasts presented in the City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehenria Plan were considered. Based on the information available, an annual growth rate of one percent was applied to the existing County Highway 101 peak hour traffic volumes. The resultant year 2019 no build conditions, including general area background growth and traffic generated by the adjacent development, are shown in Figure 5. Year 2019 No Build Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine how the adjacent roadway network will accommodate year 2019 no build traffic forecasts, an intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Results of the year 2019 no build intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 4 indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Table 4. Year 2019 No Build Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay County Highway 101/1-ake Susan Drive B 13 sec. B 18 sec. County Highway 101/86th Street(') A/B 13 sec. A/B 11 sec. 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive(') A/A 3 sec. A/A 3 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Proposed Development The proposed development is located along the east side of County Highway 101, north of TH 212, and south of 86th Street. The current development proposal, shown in Figure 6 and expected to be completed in the year 2018, consists of 16 senior independent living townhomes and a 136-unit senior living facility offering memory care, assisted, and independent living. The senior living facility is also expected to include a daycare with a capacity of 92 children. Access to the development is proposed along the south side of 86th Street across from Mission Hills Drive. Further discussion regarding site access is documented later in this study. W ION I Year 2019 No Build Conditions Figure 5 C..,uth; g G,o.p In, Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Chanhassen, MN 0148676.01 July 2016 V i•\ a Site Plan Figure 6 (.m.Il,s P, iM Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update 01e8676.01 Chanhassen, MN July 2016 1\fichael Hoagberg, Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Year 2019 Build Conditions July 14, 2016 Page 11 To help determine impacts associated with the proposed development, traffic forecasts were next developed for year 2019 build conditions (i.e. one year after anticipated completion). The build condition takes into account general area background growth and traffic generated by the adjacent and proposed developments. The evaluation of year 2019 build conditions includes details on the traffic forecasts and an intersection capacity analysis. Year 2019 Build Traffic Forecasts To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, trip generation estimates for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours and a daily basis were developed. These estimates, shown in Table 5, were developed using the ITE Trip Generation Manna4 Ninth Edition. It should be noted that several land use assumptions were used to identify specific development types and sizes for trip generation purposes based on discussions with project staff. However, no multi -use reduction factor was applied in order to provide conservative trip generation estimates. Table 5. Trip Generation Estimates — Proposed Development Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size A.M. Trips P.M. Trips Daily Trips p In Out In Out Residential Townhouse (230) 16 Dwelling Units 1 6 6 3 93 Senior Adult Housing -Attached (252) 50 Dwelling Units 3 7 7 6 172 Congregate Care Facility (253) 86 Dwelling Units 3 2 8 7 174 Day Care Center (565) 92 Students 1 39 35 35 39 403 Total Trips 1 46 50 56 55 1 842 Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 96 a.m. peak hour, 111 p.m. peak hour, and 842 daily trips. The trips generated were distributed throughout the area based on the directional distribution shown previously in Figure 4. The resultant year 2019 build conditions, including general area background growth and traffic generated by the adjacent and proposed developments, are shown in Figure 7. Year 2019 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine how the adjacent roadway network will accommodate year 2019 build traffic forecasts, an intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Results of the year 2019 build intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 6 indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LDS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the proposed development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements are not required under year 2019 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. W ON I Year 2019 Build Conditions Figure 7 (— Ohs Group Inc Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update 0148676.01 Chanhassen, MN July 2016 bfichael Hoagberg, Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Table 6. Year 2019 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay July 14, 2016 Page 13 P.M. Peak Hour LOS I Delay County Highway 101/1-ake Susan Drive B - 13 sec. B 18 sec. County Highway 101/86th Streetltl A/C 16 sec. A/B 14 sec. 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive() A/A 5 sec. A/A 5 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Year 2019 Build Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis At the request of project stakeholders, a preliminary traffic signal warrant analysis was performed based on anticipated year 2019 build traffic volumes at the County Highway 101/86th Street intersection. Results of the preliminary traffic signal warrant analysis shown in the Appendix indicate that traffic volumes at the County Highway 101/86th Street intersection are not expected to meet a traffic signal warrant under anticipated year 2019 build conditions. Therefore, no change in traffic control is recommended at the County Highway 101/86th Street intersection. However, the intersection should continue to be monitored to detemilne if future traffic volumes increase to the point of meeting a signal warrant. Year 2019 Build Conditions - Alternate Development While the proposed development is not expected to significantly impact traffic operations within the study area, it should be noted that the proposed zoning of the study property would allow for a more intense land use. Based on discussions with City staff, the highest intensity land use under the proposed zoning is assumed to be market rate apartments. Therefore, to better understand the impacts under an alternate development scenario, traffic forecasts and an intersection capacity analysis were once again completed. Year 2019 Build Traffic Forecasts - Alternate Development To account for traffic impacts associated with the alternate development, trip generation estimates for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours and a daily basis were developed. These estimates shown in Table 7 were developed using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Ninth Edition. It should be noted that a density of approximately 20 dwelling units per acre was assumed based on an inventory of nearby apartment complexes, which equates to approximately a 175-unit apartment complex. Table 7. Trip Generation Estimates - Alternate Development A.M. Trips P.M. Trips Daily Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size In Out Trips In Out Apartment (220) 175 Dwelling Units 18 71 71 1 38 1,164 Michael Hoagberg, Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC July 14, 2016 Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Page 14 Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the altemate development would be expected to generate approximately 89 a.m. peak hour, 109 p.m. peak hour, and 1,164 daily trips. It should be noted that while the alternate development total a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips are similar to those anticipated for the proposed development, the directional split of the alternate development is weighted more heavily toward that of a traditional residential development (Le. outbound during the a.m. peak hour and inbound during the p.m. peak hour). Furthermore, the alternate development would be expected to generate more total daily trips than the proposed development. The trips generated by the alternate development were distributed throughout the area based on the directional distribution shown previously in Figure 4. The resultant year 2019 build conditions, including general area background growth and traffic generated by the adjacent and alternate developments, are shown in Figure 8. Year 2019 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis -Alternate Development To determine how the adjacent roadway network will accommodate year 2019 build traffic forecasts under the alternate development scenario, an intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Results of the year 2019 build intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 8 indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the alternate development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements would not be required under year 2019 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. Table 8. Year 2019 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis -Alternate Development Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay County Highway 101/Lake Susan Drive B 13 sec. B 18 sec. County Highway 101/86th Street") A/C 18 sec. A/B 14 sec. 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive") A/A 5 sec. A/A 5 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. It should be noted that anticipated traffic volumes at the County Highway 101/86th Street intersection may meet a peak hour traffic signal warrant during the a.m. peak hour under the alternate development scenario. However, a peak hour traffic signal warrant is typically only applied in unusual cases with nearby facilities that attract or discharge significant traffic volumes over a short period of time. W ON I Year 2019 Build Conditions • Alternate Development Figure 8 con—I„I,E (—Up. In,, Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update 0146676.01 Chanhassen, MN July 2016 Michael Hoagberg, Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Site Plan/Access Review July 14, 2016 Page 16 A review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements with regard to parking, access spacing, sight distance, traffic control, and circulation. Parking As noted previously, on -street parking is allowed along the north side of 86th Street. Neighborhood concerns were expressed regarding parked cars causing sight obstructions in the vicinity of horizontal curves along 86th Street. However, since all of the parking demand associated with the senior living facility is expected to be accommodated on site, the proposed development is not expected to impact on -street parking. Access Spacing The proposed development access is expected to replace an existing field access along the south side of 86th Street across from Mission Hills Drive. Since the 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection already exists as a full -access intersection, the proposed development access does not represent a significant change in access spacing and is in a logical location. It should be noted that an existing curb cut along County Highway 101 is not expected to be utilized/changed as part of the proposed development. Sight Distance Based on field observations, horizontal curves exist along County Highway 101 to the north and south of the 86th Street intersection. Additionally, a vertical crest exists in the terrain of the study property which limits the sight distance to the south for motorists along 86th Street. Therefore, a review of the existing sight distance was completed. The required sight distance from a minor street, as indicated in A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Strrets by AASHTO, is 500 feet for a 45 mph mainline roadway. Based on the field observations at 86th Street, there is approximately 620 feet of sight distance to the south and more than 1,000 feet of sight distance to the north along County Highway 101. Therefore, the sight distance available at the County Highway 101/86th Street intersection is sufficient to clearly identify approaching vehicles. However, special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping, and signing. Traffic Control/Traffic Circulation Internal traffic controls were not identified. However, traffic controls, signing, and striping should be incorporated based on guidelines established in the Mammal on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internal roadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion. Based on this guidance, stop control should be implemented at the site access to 86th Street to reduce the potential for driver confusion. Michael Hoagberg, Chanhassen Senior Irving Developer LLC July 14, 2016 Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Page 17 A review of the proposed site circulation was also completed. The movement of general passenger vehicles within the proposed development is not expected to be an issue. However, truck turning movements should be reviewed to ensure that large vehicles (e.g. delivery/garbage/recycling trucks) have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. Furthermore, it is recommended that one-way operations be implemented at the main entrance to the senior living facility primary parking lot. One-way operations should then be continued into the facility pick-up/drop-off zone to provide an orderly flow of traffic. Finally, the raised median along 86th Street west of Mission Hills Drive should be modified to accommodate large vehicles exiting the proposed development. The modification should include striping to help delineate the travel/tum lanes. An illustration of recommended improvements is presented in Figure 9. Modify the raised median at the 86th Street/ Mission Hills Drive intersection and stripe 86th Street to help delineate the travel/turn lanes -ti a - of Implement stop control at the site access to 86th Street V *Z\ I Recommended Improvements Figure 9 F,...... , , Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Chanhassen, NIN 0148676.01 July 2016 Michael Hoagberg, Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC July 14, 2016 Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update page 19 Summary and Conclusions The following study summary and conclusions are offered for your consideration: Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the field or traffic simulation at the study intersections. 2. To help determine impacts associated with the proposed development, traffic forecasts were first developed for year 2019 no build conditions (i.e. one year after anticipated completion). The no build conditions take into account general area background growth and traffic generated by the adjacent Preserve at Rice Lake single-family residential development. a. An annual growth rate of one percent was applied to the existing County Highway 101 peak hour traffic volumes to account for general background growth. b. The Preserve at Rice Lake development is expected to generate approximately 12 a.m. peak hour,16 p.m. peak hour, and 152 daily trips. 3. Results of the year 2019 no build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. 4. The proposed development is located along the east side of County Highway 101, north of TH 212, south of 86th Street, and is expected to be completed in the year 2018. a. The current development proposal consists of 16 senior independent living townhomes and a 136-unit senior living facility offering memory care, assisted, and independent living. The senior living facility is also expected to include a daycare with a capacity of 92 children. b. Access to the development is proposed along the south side of 86th Street across from Mission Hills Drive. 5. The proposed development is expected to generate approximately 96 a.m. peak hour, 111 p.m. peak hour, and 842 daily trips. 6. Results of the year 2019 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. a. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the proposed development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements are not required under year 2019 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. Michael Hoagberg, Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC July 14, 2016 Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Page 20 8. Results of a preliminary traffic signal warrant analysis indicate that traffic volumes at the County Highway 101/86th Street intersection are not expected to meet a traffic signal warrant under anticipated year 2019 build conditions. Therefore, no change in traffic control is recommended at the County Highway 101/86th Street intersection. a. The County Highway 101/86th Street intersection should continue to be monitored to determine if future traffic volumes increase to the point of meeting a signal warrant. 9. An alternative land use scenario was also reviewed to understand the impacts of the highest intensity use allowed under the proposed zoning, which was assumed to he market rate apartments. Approximately 175 apartment units were assumed, which would be expected to generate approximately 89 a.m. peak hour,109 p.m. peak hour, and 1,164 daily trips. 10. Results of the year 2019 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under the alternate development scenario. No significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. a. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the alternate development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements would not be required under year 2019 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. 11. Parking, access spacing, sight distance, traffic control, and circulation were reviewed in the Site Plan/Access Review section. Key recommendations and considerations include: a. Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping, and signing. b. When designing internal traffic controls, incorporate improvements based on guidelines established in the Mammal on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internal roadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion. c. Implement stop control at the site access to 86th Street to reduce the potential for driver confusion. d. Review truck turning movements to ensure that large vehicles have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. e. Implement one-way operations at the main entrance to the senior living facility primary parking lot. Continue one-way operations into the facility pick-up/drop-off zone to provide an orderly flow of traffic. f. Modify the raised median at the 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection and stripe 86th Street to help delineate the travel/turn lanes. H:\Proms\8676\TA8676-01\RoarA8676-01 cb=&wx mi*,Fm+ffryTruffufmdyUpdWt 160714.dm Appendix - Preliminary Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Year 2019 Build Conditions WA �� 6thStreAe Consulting croup, me. Chanhassen Seni Chanhassen MN v Chanhassen, MN Me: 711312016 $ mph) ( Lanae Approach 45 2or more No bound County Highway 101 wAnalysis € 11-ocaltdon: Prepares!By: Jordan Schwarze 45 IMajorApproachi 2or more Major Appromi Souttbound County Highway 101 u Population Less Men 10,000: ^- 30 Minor Approach 2'. Eutdound N/A M Seventy Perini Factor Used: let 30 1 Minor Approach 1. Westbound Bfim Street Me* Me* Total wa K Mirror Minor Largest wand Mal Lid Same Hours Combination MWSA(C) a Hour Approach Approsee3 143 420 630 Approach2 Approsoh4 Minor App. 105 53 CondpbnA CadsbnBT Val fee 6-7 AM 115 fib 181 0 8 8 m 7-8 AM 329 187 516 % 0 24 24 4 d 8-9 AM 920 310 1238 X X 0 68 68 A 1 % 9-10 AM 638 362 1000 % X 0 46 46 x 10- II AM 443 252 695 1( 1( 0 32 32 A 11 -12 AM 467 265 732 A X 0 33 33 3 i 12 -1 PM 528 300 828 X A 0 38 38 A 1-2 PM 719 408 1127 X X 0 52 52 A i. 2-3 PM 613 348 961 % x 0 44 44 x 3-4 PM 728 113 fluff X x 0 52 52 2 % a 4-5 PM 898 509 1407 X X 0 64 64 % X X X 5-6 PM 878 498 1376 % A 0 63 63 X x X X 6-7 PM 682 fi% 1370 % X 0 16 16 % 2 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 Z. warrdrl mid Desorption Houn Met Hours RaydM Me"Ot Md E iW Warrant IA'. Minimum Vehar Volume 0 8 E Warrant18. Mandator, of Conaouous Traffic 3 8 w+ Warrant 1C-. ComGnation of Warrants 0 8 Warrani Four-hour Vehicular Volume 3 4 bm Warrant 3B. Peak Hour 0 1 3 MWSA (C): Multivay Stop Applications Condition C 0 8 W1;N WARRANT B6th Street c n.ulNnq croup Inc. Chanhassen 1100 1000 900 am p o 7M SQL U t W pU N 400 Q 300 S 200 100 i a Year 2019 Build Conditions WARRANT 2 - FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1600 1500 16W 1700 1800 1900 2000 MAJOR STREET- TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-VPH 1. 80 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOIUM: FOR A MNOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 60 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 2. INTERSECTION IS EITHER (1) WITHIN A COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10.000 POPULATION OR (2) HAS SPEEDS ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET 86thStreeet@ County Highway 101 cen.umng coup, m�. Chanhassen Senior Facility TS Update 1100 1000 900 am E 700 3u 600 U w0 5m R ya 400 Q O Z 300 200 100 i 0 100 Build Conditions WARRANT 3-PEAK HOUR 200 300 400 500 600 700 000 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 low INN 10110 MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— WH 1. 100 W H APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH NTH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 WH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING NTH ONE LANE. 2. INTERSECTION IS EITHER (1) NITHIN A COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR (2) HAS SPEEDS ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET. 1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION April 6, 2017 Sharmeen Al-Jaff City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Mission Hills Senior Living AInDOT Review # S17-022 NE Quadrant of MN 101 (Great Plaines Blvd.) and US 212 Chanhassen, Carver County Dear Ms. Al -Jaffa Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan for the Mission Hills Senior Living development. Please address the following issues before any further development: Water Resources: A drainage permit is required. We would like to review the computations and plans as a check that the proposed development maintains or reduces drainage rates to MnDOT right of way when comparing the existing to the proposed condition. Please submit documents below with drainage permit application for review and approval: 1. Grading and drainage plans and hydraulic calculations to show that the proposed flows to MnDOT right-of-way will remain the same or less than existing conditions. 2. Existing and Proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows and labeling that corresponds with the submitted calculations. 3. Hydro CAD model and pdf of output for the 2, 10, and 100 year Atlas 14 storm events. Drainage permit application can be found at: hU://www.dot.state.mn.us/utility/forms.html- Application for Drainage Permit MnDOT Drainage Permits Checklist can be found at: httn:Hihub/metro/wre/Link%20Files/Drainage%2OPermit%2OApplications%2OChecklist.pdf For questions on these points or to submit additional information, please call Jamie Strandemo, MnDOT Metro District Water Resources Engineering, at (651) 234-7526 or email iamie.strandemo c&state.mn.us . An equal opportunity employer MnDCT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 Carver County Pu6Cu Worlds Uni„ist.atio„ 113609Gghway 212 OEtratin,u suite Tiogime LX,6(em Cologne, MV 55322-8016 ?arks T(iow(952)466-5200 tfax(952)466-5223 April 6, 2017 City of Chanhassen c/o Sharmeen AI-Jaff Re: Development / Access Review Comments: Mission Hills Senior Housing — CSAH 101 — TH 212- 86th Street West Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject development in the City of Chanhassen. Consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and County Codes, the following are comments and recommended conditions of approval as requirements for any necessary permits to be issued for the project: 1. There are some concerns with traffic operations at the subject intersection of 86th St West and CSAH 101 related to both pedestrian crossings and exiting motor vehicle traffic from 861° St onto CSAH 101. It may be that sometime in the future that the City and County need to partner for additional pedestrian crossing and/or intersection improvements. 2. The applicants Plat Boundary appears to be reasonably consistent with the underlying plat and MnDOT RW plats, including the portion conveyed to the state from the original Outlot E. MnDOT shows Access Control along south side and west side except 60 foot opening at the section line. These may need to be updated correctly on all documents and should be reflected on site plans more clearly. 3. Prior to site plan approval, the County will need to review and approve the stormwater plans. A potential concern is whether the existing TH 101 stone system that this development is tying into at TH 101 and 86th St. is adequate for the storm water from this development. 4. Any existing field access or existing driveways such as the one on CSAH 101 will need to be removed and replaced with ditch and /or curb and gutter in order to preclude nuisance use. Note to same shall be made on face of site plan. 5. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way, the applicant shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility or Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) from Carver County Public Works: (htti)7//www.co.carver.mn.us/how-do-i/ai)i)lv-for/a-permi ). Final details of locations, grades, and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed and approved prior to any permits. 6. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on CSAH 101 from current or approved conditions will need to remedied or updated at developer expense, including costs incurred by the County. R:\Program Delivery\Transportation\Development Review\2017\2017-1 These are comments at this time. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at dmccormick(&co.carver.mn.us or by phone at (952) 466-5208. Sincerely. Dan McCormick, P.E. PTOE Transportation Manager Carver County Public Works a: Chad Braun (TE / Permits) R:\Program Delivery\Transportation\Development Review\2017\2017-1 17550Hemlock MN5504Avenue I`Mission Kills Lakeville, MN 55044 (952) 378-4386 , mhoogberg@headwatersdevelopment.biz �PII!( April 4, 2017 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to the City of Chanhassen seeking approval of a Site Plan Development for the following described property: Outlot E Mission Hills — Senior Living Community and Day Care Center Site near the Northeast corner of Highway 101 (Great Plains Boulevard) and Highway 212. We are asking the City to approve this application to allow development of Outlot E Mission Hills into a 152 senior housing units providing Independent Living, Assisted Living, and Memory Care Services for our residents. The development also includes a 9,000 square foot day care center, which is part of our intergenerational programing at the community. A Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully informed of our development intentions and to give you an opportunity to offer comments and suggestions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on April 13t'', 2017 at 5:30pm at the American Legion Post 580, 290 Lake Drive East, Chanhassen, MN 55317. At this meeting we will make every effort to show you how the property will be developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly. Sincerely, Michael J. Hoagber Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC Managing Member October 28, 2014 Kathryn Aanenson, Chanhassen Development Director Lyndon Robjent, Carver County Engineer Dear Kathryn & Lyndon: This fetter is to request that the Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association would like to start discussions with the city and county about traffic control as the result of future development of property located on the southeast corner Highway 101 and West 86 h Street in Chanhassen. Currently, the property is for sale, Barr Engineering has done soil borings during the past two weeks, and a surveying company is surveying/staking the property. As you are aware, a new housing development is currently being built on West 86' street and Tigua Lane. The combination of new traffic from this development plus the traffic generated by future development of the property on the SE corner of 101 and W 86th Street will compound the current traffic issues to access 101 from W 86th The Mission Hills Homeowners' Association represents 56 homes on the West Side of W 86th Street. A majority of our residents are retired and considered senior citizens of our community. We are concerned for the safety of our association members as they access the 101 & 86th Intersection. The current median on West 86th & 101 will need to be redesigned to accommodate the access from future development of the SE corner proper �y currently Io( sale. T'ne existing driveway off Of W 86th to this property was not designed to handle large amounts of traffic. it was designed for a farmer field access. The control of traffic at 101 and W 86th to allow residents using 86th to access SOS is our biggest concern. We would like to see a controlled signal intersection but are open to other traffic control systems to manage traffic at this location. Please consider this letter our request to be participants in the planning and design meetings for the future intersection of Highway 101 and W Be Street. Respectfully Submitted, Karla Thomsen, President Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association Our Board Member Dave Nickolay is the board representative assigned to work with the City and County. He can be reached through the following: Mail: 552 Mission Hills Dr Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: 952-974-5285 Email: acmadave@gmail.com December 5, 2014 Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen Dear Sharmeen: CITY OFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 0 8 2014 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEFT This letter is in follow-up to our telephone call yesterday and the letter you received dated October 28, 2014 concerning the proposed senior housing development on the southeast corner of Highway 101 and West 86`h Street. As we discussed, the Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association would like to be involved in the planning discussions concerning the redesign of the West 86`h median where it intersects with Mission Hills Drive, leading to Highway 101. We also request that we be involved in the planning of the changes to the intersection of Highway 101 and West 861h Street resulting from the increased traffic from all area deveiopment. Our biggest concern involves the control of traffic at 101 and 861h, making a left hand turn or going south on 101 is a problem today, and will grow with the two housing projects being connected to 86'h in 2015. As we also discussed, future development on the west side of 101 on the remaining open land should be taken into consideration at this time. Also the city trail that crosses 101 at 861h will also need to be addressed. As an association we request the City give serious consideration to working with all government agencies involved to construct a roundabout on 101 where it intersects with 861h. If the roundabout is not feasible, we are open to other traffic control systems to improve the current problem of left hand turns/south bound 101 traffic coming out of 86`h Street. Sharmeen, please consider this letter to be our second request to be participants in the planning and re -design meetings for the future intersection of Highway 101 and W 861h Street. Respectfully submittedv David F Nickolay, Vice President Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA lau�n�e�a+e!t+xr me^- ww •� A0.0 N [imml awe _ [.� w xam r.s •J r sc r� I ' PLAT FILE N0. X , M/SS/ON H/LLS 3HD ADD/T/ON C.R. DOC. N0. ly ydw. r�r r�ww W[Y.wr,bw u•imm•rn ^ '\ •, '' ,Y4n [fin [rY.Yw[�ibai wr['w'iwiu'�rww ymu•wiN.rr Ow��"Niilm�rw � \ YR,�aT \ � .;....mwwr,ww•w.r.rmw[wm......••m`�"' w' \ '`t u •sr [^wnw �_wiir •r'�iuwn.•i in wr'•"i. ry �YiwwM �w.•''%��'��s[} J- •uss'[ [,awr-! 'iiii : r.wwr,[wwm- .rr a �w r wr r n•• w m o'� g � �n ��'[-•.•,ww•rpn+wwa�u[wmro,__••n.ruwa•mr•.rru•.w r„ ,-".PA.'R. ��....mww r�...m. � ..,-. •w rr [r.mw....n•[......•r.. 26 ,.w.�" _ nri'." s�„w ;,y � _""`S:•: wf. ,. Luc. - m,....•�. __ ___,.. 4 — �� Ip(, -.,m m. .wMt".:"... '^^^.°....® C.Ca: ".ww..""�[�i.4.. �•rr..+..:•"Y.m.:r.�•.. LOT 1 _11✓-e__%F[ .... ..•... _. ' ' oltip, EJjS,�N 5�8J�G JJ i •,'mar ,, A ; "w2m11 NM -s"muf[ NO.. 1C r F •• �[rw� �YnY �.• r 'r _ m�iW Amna _`_•w•r�wVati MY•.I•w w0.Y W wvYn�YdOmWu Nru wiwi TG. u,ti rw� Me.[u!_.f•wY YMMi. CJ ��� �� � ow:wrww..°�"c.r"6...•"rrr..m.w ir... r[,••m...-••.. _,.,.m__ mom..; I a .... r•. m....mnwr. "" __ SSSUNDE r• / w ycl \ ifawAYAKx aw NC. 10-17 N ' z'U—M .ros,ndesiar se®�ae���vns ��owrranwas IrrIk 7AUUNNK H/GHWAY NO. 212 12.N 1N tia�¢s B n..n n DOW- is vMBIMLFUM nvwnli vm�iu�iy mry��� -s wuuii mm�� •�u� v ^fin Ny�.;mn�..wsvu. m..iw'n��rin n�nreM nm ne `. -..�'.' a.. i i : �a'•EM— Y; {I{E�d>ppp Pas�p�pM i ReV°vY7o F n CONTROL PLAN Cloo �,.��a-,�•uaas •• t:sa : S�.n i:•m nav P.M —II�Tlroma•oa •:ms — ,n UTILrrY PLAN WIN ar. .....,._..._._n.-,...�._� 52.E Rig e�nsu�:6.M rnmuuW �@ G FOR OR/� SW n A 0 I PAVING AND GEOMETRIC PLAN C300 44.25 O O 6.25 21, 50 bkbm firetruck feet WEth : 6.50 TmcY : 8.50 Look to Lock Time : 6.0 Slearing Angle : 45.7 I t • 414 FI M� 54 7� tr7r:< * � � Y r�CurIW�M9n r= Yr.L 1 1 — r �vwe oe em Sri 1 m �riii�ViKi%rotten awn.., • j5Rf�4L. A.1.�'�"�.�.... RMi,r�IOYCO W. FA ��rnw al..Y 2,1 - \ R %3� i tlt•P mall .�iame�aw��wra �l TM . onui ox wa�w�ru. esc swos i �. � � YI �l corrue25¢wNu We h 6 T a� o �Ykt K K �JL 4 y I� CML DUALS SHEET C401 jITAY(/dM1YAYAV Tf2 _— ®��{RWFd3YY3yYcrY© 00m®®m®wi 00m©®m®�•a,a �00mmmm� S1Mw]FP uxWi SWWW w� r�i o� x�v�lfl e NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP 0 irt:K'7}k' aYYill'� STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN A 103 u m 6000 ^� a ''�/L.ili© � •. M160ICN HILLS SENIOR Ll I SITE ftd � pETdMMG WPLL DETdIL 3 FLdGf'OLE BdSE SECTION GOLLa ETAL 6"� NOTES o Te'LdH ILrEo HotEe: o� ®us F� 9 MTEFN4TIONdL SYMBOL. OF dCGESSIBILItt ��JJ�aaa z �gE / 'LZO�L� d U -" Q J 4� OLn T$T( Z :snE wp O ALS AM � ENLAR'tD HOlBL"0:M 8KN PLAN riorarer-n eEw eEcnoNe r[_-_-__--_riI__-__rI1-- -�----_H.__- ___AJ ".' --------- __ —____—___——_-1__L _—________L... I � � I i L------ IYEFIq¢Y CAW PATIO FENCE GOLVND --- 1_—v —____1___L—_-1____J SM ELEVATIO � FE11q¢i GAIE Pd1101ENCE AND COLIIN ELEVATIpItl • ngNY.1EM SGN AtQ �� E A1.2 1 MIS "ILLe eeNIOR LIVRG e1Te PLdN W aaa�lIaaa 1 1 z o 5s J � yZC O w N < J O 6 {cn O . ivap5(ME GNN •iMiµNIICN IrtW6 . R.wi SCHFDIAE Al .3 - r� rr1-11, If � - r �1 i i_ ■IIIOV ti INMEa •$i:GP I YYlli" �g�g""— iil■' 'Ian' sir' �4Y1■�71� Iij'._��I it ■.� ■ cxrtacp �irvnna+s A3.0 Attau_ yil •1.1,.... Wr-mor, full x. rr All s � § � � z A2 ���-fir • - •,--- ram" ` r, P 7 - tiJ t�f f'� r GIF=Fj all J� 114 4 r t117"F' r. dl 3D VIEW FROM THE CURB IN FRONT Of A TWINHOME MLA RESIDENCE 3D VIEW FROM FROM THE AIR BEHBdD A TWINHCM E VILLA RESIDENCE Prey ^wP fi FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION t�y IW1Nq FVLLA YIEW " BEVAT] A3.20 TWINHOME DESIGN OPTION # 1 0 TWINHOML DESIGN OPTION # R MNHOME DESIGN OPTION LOCATIONS T NHOME DESIGN OPTION #3 op TWINHOME DESIGN OPTION #6 an J_ 0 N nvm#cmE Nun oEvw omlas aon A3.21 1. &eMeN Felixlenca M BWWM omen nMeO oMerxiee 1. NdaCon9lrudun O.—M for D.1p pury .only 3.&.r dln ,.a 11.0 W&F F, unless nd9E Wh... e. 9ryMeM MEpor talc polnl9 ®GreJe unless ndM o1Be1WY9 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: May 8, 2017 RESOLUTION NO: 2017-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIMITED -USE PERMIT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR NON -MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL TRAIL IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 101 NORTH OF HIGHWAY 212 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chanhassen is the official governing body of the City of Chanhassen; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen desires to construct a non -motorized recreational trail connection within MnDOT's Highway 101 right-of-way as a condition of the Mission Hills Senior Living Development; and WHEREAS, this non -motorized recreational trail will connect with an existing pedestrian sidewalk to promote the orderly and safe crossing of the highway; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation requires a limited -use permit for all non -motorized recreational trails constructed within their right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Chanhassen do authorize the approval of a limited -use permit for the construction, maintenance and operation of a non -motorized recreational trail within the right-of-way of Trunk Highway 101. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Limited Use Permit and any amendments to the Permit. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this a day of May, 2017. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT W191 DESIGNERS Consulting Group, Inc. To: Michael Hoagberg Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC From: Jordan Schwarze, PE, Senior Engineer Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Date: July 14, 2016 Subject: Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Update Introduction DRAFT Memorandum Due to site plan revisions, SRF has completed an update to the Chanhassen Senior Facility Trafic Study (dated 12/21/2014) for the proposed development located near the TH 212/County Highway 101 interchange (see Figure 1). The main objectives of this study are to review the revised site plan with regard to trip generation, access, and circulation. The updated study will include an evaluation of the potential need to improve the County Highway 191/86th Street intersection traffic control. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and study conclusions offered for consideration. Existing Conditions The existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline in order to identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes peak period intersection turning movement counts, field observations, and an intersection capacity analysis. Data Collection Peak period turning movement counts were collected by SRF during the week of October 27, 2014 for the Cbanbassen Senior Facility Traffic Study at the following intersections: • County Highway 101 and Lake Susan Drive/TH 212 Westbound Ramps • County Highway 101 and 86th Street Note: 86tb Stiret/Mission Hi& Drive intersection volumes were deriind from the Count i Hgghway 101 / 861h Street intersection turning motrment counts and surrounding land use ti pgeneration estimates. The collected year 2014 data was modified based on historical traffic volume trends in the vicinity of the proposed development to reflect existing year 2016 conditions. It should be noted that historical annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes within the study area were provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). ONE CARISON PARKWAY, Sun v 150 1 rluaNSArous, MN 55447 1 763.475.0010 1 VMM.SRFCONSULTRJG.COM name ana Aaaress: Tracy Sgns.--.. 2-7655 Email: -894-2748 Property Owner Name and Address: - Driessen Group 4999 France Ave Suite 216 -Minneapolia, -NM -55-4-10-- Contact: Paul Stearn§:— Phn.,(;1.2-.'Ala_,nanl r_ Email; petea Permanent Sign ($100): $ 100.00 Electronic Message Center Sign ($300): Temporary Sign ($35): From: _/ /_ To: NOTE: Sign fee is due at time of permit application. A separate application is required for each sign. TYPE OF SIGN Required Inspec 'ons illuminated Sieus Other-Reauirements Footing An electrical permit must The approved plans and permit Foundation be obtained and final electrical must be on site for the final — Final msp ec tion approval is required. inspection. REQUIRED INFORMATION Wording on Sign: None Type of illumination: LED, No -Faces '- _ Signrain - _ -- — ----- -Wall Anchorage Details: NA Specifications of fasteners (e.g., size, type, number per letter, and spacing): NA Approximate weight of sign:- 220 lbs Valueof Sign: S 8,000.00 - Estimated Date of Completion:-9/25/2015 - - - -,.-.- -- -- - Will the sign be,located in a public,draMgg QT.4tWty.easetuent?: _ Yes .X NO - NOTE: Please attach an elevation drawing to scale of the entire wall of the building to which the sign is to be affixed, accurately locating the sign. If the sign is free standing, attach a site plan showing the exact location of the sign in relation to the property lines and plans indicating the manner the sign and/or its support will be constructed. THE UNDRRSIGNED IMREBYAGRE44YTO DO ALL WORKINACCORDANCEWITH CHANHASSENan, ---eODE-A3YDTtl ULINGS-0 IN BN�DII ISION. — --- I i I I I j—�.I ��6BIEN,PRIYOF t I. _ _ —, cchad.tracy TLS CROUO METAL FACC., W/1'AGTILIC PII H'WPU OP] I n yEmgnvE..u. J oaoNxu ew'.sszm MO! E/SOI.M/ �'M11 r— I I Ib�06 E F0. EU(iNSVILL6. RN fi5YJ7 �rvOfJE/9i" B'N�N31 Ijj o 1m1wu[TIFTP,�� CHSmmwAX. rw 1 ;' I .' res nzoss ' I I I I � '. D2wMg NanMr '- 9 1 I O'1hPQ1EL__. Y2 �. I BRICK TO LATCH EIJII nlrW 'Wev�mF- I Do h !I d I 11 Q D ! I n..w. t - I I d • Il mnwRuara wlamm.wa'�iea I I �� rnrwrunloava�u _ NrEROMM LLIC�DIRR 1 f rrtvTl PIRf OIt1RIRffI10 .. I _ G.m_c rCF'OL�G 4hE: CUi SiZ�'OR. AOU O PANELS G iEFC?,nVVL.:. PANE'J I r�I SHEET NO. 10,1 pp I I I I � ,t I, t - '. T - - ._, tt60<l�MN6151PE'ltN9[RM' RO FD ME(AI FAQ I P.1 "Llf� ri4F CJ�." '� - TCES BV OiNER scnad-tracq.'i I � -1 �SIQfFS .L ' L xv M�ME90iAAVF_N, Pa xo r+rJerm _ o,z a aer'-xili 1. � I i� OOELIJFFR4 111 [q)PN9vllE, Mi Yia) ' FAti/S2.B94Zri8 nF• 8' v wmP NLLYivag:V I�l u.tc tz'I Fea netts I� L or.a sNurtv eelcN THE t'OTHERS � �'1.3� 'nxrroe.ot nts-. 9 �� 1P Rrvinmr - 13 I Fp a,M � Yn 1y ONRY BY OTHERS9— �r i t ANP �^ RICK TO MATCH BUiL0ING S Po - U AI N bV60NK:'2KG< j j 0`: iifHECSI Isr, y - V �. 52 iLEE CDL'JIAM I '. w.�.. ' Nn, T✓.-.+ (/�ppVY, I - m TM�^4 9,1a w ly, m.wn.t.a nh mn , �nlpVm(♦MIm� f1 »ewio.Mf I M W"ED NEW Dff - MONUMENT SIGN -', ROUTE ,> Ffiim IT�1 J" PUSH hIURS t CONCPE�EFOOTING I. v . rnrvrfnm nw _ _ . � wwnemnv[[J��'v,rm®a allmr �< mor4[C+1 DUEudE.%o�e rol t pµ°� .._..._.._..........._.��...,..._._.. I' SHE NO 101 ._...__t... Q..LJ�..._.,.. I ..a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division —7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-13001 Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date: PC Date: — _ CC Date: 60-Day Review Date: (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence................................$325 ❑ All Others.........................................................$425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 0 Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)........ .......... $750 0 Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 0 Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative..................................................$100 j] CommerciaVlndustrialDistricts`......................$600 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ( 9 thousand square feet) 'Include number of exu�6'no employees: 'Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts.........................................$500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( 136 units) ❑✓ Notification Sign (city to install and remove) ..... ❑ Subdivision (SUB) nv Create 3 lots or less........................................$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots.......................$600 + $15 per lot (_ lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds(2lots)..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 (] Final Plat..........................................................$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)" 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ...............................$150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall he charged for each application. ............ $200 ❑� Property Owners' List within 500' (city to generate after preapplicatbn meeting) .................................................. $3 per address (114 addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑� Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements i— easements) TOTAL FEE: $2,962.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Adding Day Care to the inside of the Mission Hills Senior Living Apartment Building Property Address or Location: _ Parcel #: Mission Hills Outlot E Hwy 101 and Hwy 212 Legal Description: Outlot E of the plat of Mission Hills, Carver County, Minnesota Total Acreage: 8•64 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes 0 No Present Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) 0 Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Q Present Land Use Designation: Mixed 0 Requested Land Use Designation: Mixed 0 Existing Use of Property: Undeveloped ❑ Check box is separate narrative is attached. PropertySection 3: .. APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. Contact: Eric Reiners Address: 4200 Old Shakapee Rd Phone: (952) 996-9662 City/State/Zip: loo ington, MN 55437 Cell: Email: enc@sra-mn.com Fax: (952) 996-9663 Signature: o Date: 3/16/17 PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC Contact: Michael Hoagberg Address: 17550 Hemlock Avenue Phone: (952) 378-4386 City/State/Zip: Lakeville, MN 55044 Cell: Email: mhoagberg@headwatersdevelopment.biz Fax: Signature: Date: 3/16/17 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this applicationgrefer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specificordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER ('If applicable) Name: BKBM Contact Keith Matte Address: 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Phone: (763) 843-0464 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55429 Cell: Email: kmatte@bkbm.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: 0 Property Owner via: ❑✓ Email 0 Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑✓ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑✓ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑� Engineer Via: ✓❑ Email Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing (required). SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMfi FORM PROJECT NARRATIVE Mission Hills Senior Living Hwy 101 and 212, Chanhassen, Minnesota Project Team: Owner/Developer Design Lead / Architecture Headwaters Development Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. 17550 Hemlock Avenue 4200 West Old Shakopee Road Lakeville, MN 55044 Bloomington, MN 55437 Contact: Michael Hoagberg, Managing Member Contact: Eric A. Reiners, AIA Phone: 952-378-4386 Phone: 952-996-9662 Email: mhoagberg@headwatersdevelopment.biz email: eric@sra-mn.com Facility Operator Civil Engineer Ebenezer BKBM Engineers 2722 Park Ave. South 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55407 Minneapolis, MN 55429 Contact: Susan Farr Contact: Keith Matte, PE Phone: 612-874-3460 Phone: 763-843-0464 Structural Engineer Surveyor BKBM Engineers Sunde Land Surveying 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. 9001 East Bloomington Freeway Ste. 118 Minneapolis, MN 55429 Bloomington, MN 55420 Contact: Tina Wyffles Contact: Lenny Carlson, PLS Phone: 763-843-0420 Phone: 952-881-2455 General Contractor Traffic Engineer Engelsma Construction, Inc. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. 7119 31n Avenue North One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55427 Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 Contact: Jeff Engelsma Contact: Jordan Schwarze, PE Phone: 763-536-9200 Phone: 763-452-4787 PROJECT SITE DATA Parcel Basics The existing site is currently an undeveloped, 8.64 acre parcel identified as Mission Hills Third Addition. The property is bounded by Trunk Highway 101 to the west, Trunk Highway 212 to the south, 86`h Street West on the north, and Mission Hills Outlot B with previously developed townhomes to the east. Project Land Use Data The project site falls under the Chanhassen Mixed -Use guiding (Commercial/Residential), and the Mission Hills PUD Neighborhood Commercial zoning, and was unanimously approved for the development of Mission Hills Senior Living by the Planning Commission and the City Council in February of 2015. Additionally, this resubmittal and application specifically requests the approval of a child daycare on -site. The proposed daycare is to be accommodated within the footprint of the main housing structure and occupies approximately 8,600SF. The daycare provides child care for up to 90 children. Under the permitted residential land use for the parcel, residential density calculations as provided by Planning Staff, is comprised of 16 allowable residential units per acre across the 7.72 net site acres (123.5 units), plus 33 total residential units of un-used unit density from the original Mission Hills PUD development. The result is a total allowable zoned site density of 156 residential units. Mission Hills PUD does not specifically govern parking, hardcover, setbacks or building heights and these components of the proposed development will be guided by the city's underlying district guidelines. City ordinance requires one parking space for everythree assisted living units, plus parking forvisitors and staff. Refer to the matrix below for a parking summary illustrating required and provided parking. Parking Independent Living Unit Assisted Living Unit Staff (maximum shift) Child -Care Guests & Visitors TOTAL PARKING Required Provided 1 per townhouse unit = 16 16 1 for every 3 assisted unit = 46 84 136 total Assisted Living Units 1 per employee = 24 33 1 for every 6 children of 15 design capacity of 90 children 38 101 + Visitors 186 The site will have a total of 86 surface parking spaces for staff and visitors. This is comprised of 75 spaces directly in front of the main building, and 11 spaces for town home guests. The main building will also have 84 underground parking spaces, and the town home villas will have 16 individual garage stalls bringing the site total to 186 parking spaces. In addition, the driveways leading to each of the town homes has been planned with a minimum length of twenty feet to accommodate additional parking directly in front of each unit if required. Since most of our residents are not expected to drive, we expect many of our employees will park under the main building which will leave surface spaces for visiting friends and relatives. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT DATA Program The site will be developed and finished to accommodate a 136-unit, senior housing structure whose primaryfocus will be to provide independent living, assisted living and memory care apartments to senior citizens together with a full continuum of care allowing the residents to comfortably age in place, while supported by the full range of additional services provided by Ebenezer, the facility operator. In addition, there will be a 6 classroom and 1 infant room childcare center on the first floor of the housing structure. Ebenezer has had great success in programming and providing for inter -generational care at the Ebenezer Ridges Campus in Burnsville. To quote the Ebenezer Ridges Inter -Generational program description: This innovative program provides day care for young children and includes interaction with participants in an adult day program for seniors. Something magical happens every day at the Ebenezer Intergenerational Day Program when the young and the old spend time together. As they help each other and learn from one another, an unmistakable bond forms that rises above differences in age and ability. Building on Ebenezer's faith -based heritage, our intergenerational program helps bridge the generation gap. Children learn respect for older adults and compassion for their physical limitations. Older adults maintain self-worth by sharing their lives and experiences. Children bring life, spirit and joy to seniors on the campus, keeping them young at heart The attention and encouragement of seniors helps children flourish. Ebenezer Ridges Intergenerational Program received national recognition two years in a row. The 2009 Generations United Shared Site Award and the 2010 Generations United/MetLife Foundation Intergenerational Shared Site Excellence Award recognize excellence in bringing generations together. Additionally, the site will contain eight (8) twin homes, adding sixteen more independent living units to the development. These single story twin homes will be located on the north end of the site and closest to the site entrance and West 86"' Street. Total planned residential units on site will remain at 152 - the same as defined in the 2015 project approvals. The site will include a series of amenities for the residents as well. These amenities include patios, gardens, and walking paths. The walking paths will connect to the central site circulation as well as the public sidewalk along west 86" Street that was developed as a part of the original Mission Hills development P.U.D. site The existing site is currently undeveloped, roughly graded for agricultural use, and contains only volunteer vegetation with the exception of its boundary with the town home property to the east, which is densely planted. Many of the mature volunteer trees along the east and north boundaries of the site will be preserved as a part of the final development plan. Under this development plan, however, the site will be re -graded to accommodate the planned building and necessary infrastructure and construction. Impervious surface coverage for this site was not redefined in the original P.U.D. and thus, the city ordinance for this development type will govern, limiting hardcover to 50% and requiring a minimum of 50% green space. As illustrated in the summary matrix below and the summary tables on the Civil Engineering sheets in the submittal set, the green space requirement is met. Developed property area: 376,546 SF 8.644 Acres Building footprints: 81,255 SF 1.865 Acres Total impervious surface area: 179,903 SF 4.13 Acres 47.80% of Site Total green surface area: 196,456 SF 4.51 Acres 52.20% of Site Engineering and Utilities Project civil engineers, BKBM Engineers, together with city engineering staff have worked closely in preliminary stages to accommodate and properly configure the building development, site coverage and storm water management, as well as the requisite utility connections. Storm water management plan, including collection, treatment, infiltration, rate control and discharge are fully explained and detailed within the submittal drawings. These components of the site design are substantially unchanged from the designs that were approved by the city and watershed in 2015, but have been modified and updated to reflect the changes required by the introduction of the child daycare program. Building Design The main building will be a four-story wood frame structure over a concrete and precast basement — a structural configuration and height implemented elsewhere in Chanhassen at developments such as SummerWood of Chanhassen located just north of this proposed development site. The basement level will house utility, storage and inside parking functions for the structure. The ground floor will welcome residents and visitors through the main entrance with a covered drop-off and house most of the building's public spaces. These include commercial kitchen and dining rooms, and connection to the rest of the development amenities. Ground floor will also encompass the primary health care functions, guest suite, a closed 28-suite memory care wing, and nine of the assisted living apartment units will be on the first level. The child day-care is also housed on the first floor with direct connections to the exterior playground. All of the functions of the child day-care are contained on the first -floor east wing of the building. These include 6 classrooms, 1 infant room, support spaces and an intergenerational room that connects from the child day-care to the activity area of the adult housing. Levels two and three will contain another 65 resident apartments varying in size from 514 SF studios to 1,224 SF, two -bedroom, two -bath residences. Selected residences are provided with balconies and other unit amenities. Each floor also contains spaces for health care attendants, and common area functions such as laundry (to supplement washer/ dryers available in most units). Level four will house the final 34 residential units. Once again, a cross-section of larger units are provided with balconies to take advantage of wonderful views over the surrounding areas. The fourth level also provides additional resident common areas, a library that overlooks the entire site, and out toward Lake Susan to the northwest. Exterior building materials will be masonry and painted siding, and the structure will have sloped shingle roofs. Gutters and downspouts will discharge on grade and into catch basins that will flow through storm water treatment areas —on grade and/or below grade —prior to exiting the site. Once again, storm water management plan, including collection, treatment, infiltration, rate control and discharge are fully explained and detailed within the submittal civil drawings. The twin home villas will capture some of the details from the main building creating an aesthetic synthesis of building components across the site, and each individual independent twin home will contain approximately 1,186 finished square feet, plus the single inside garage stall. Miscellaneous Building Components Mechanical screening as required by city ordinance is very limited as most of the mechanical systems are contained within the structure. Limited screening, where required, will be achieved by roof screens designed to coordinate with the building architecture. Site trash enclosure is not illustrated in the development plan and will not be used. Interior trash rooms are utilized in the facility plan, dumpsters will be rolled out on collection days, and back inside to trash rooms following pick up. Site deliveries, move-in/move-out, and building service including trash collection are all achieved on the southwest corner of the building and site at the building's lower level. This service entry point and its access drive are the most remote from neighboring residents and away from all neighborhood traffic and views. Traffic Studv A traffic study was completed by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. The main objectives of this study were to review existing operations within the study area, evaluate the traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network, and recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development. Furthermore, this study also provided a comparison between the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, and those associated with the maximum potential traffic demand under the proposed zoning, which is assumed to be market rate apartments. Results of the year 2017 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable range or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the proposed development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements are not required under year 2017 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. An alternative land use scenario was also reviewed to understand the impacts of the highest intensity use allowed under the proposed zoning, which was assumed to be market rate apartments. Approximately 175 apartment units were assumed, which would be expected to generate approximately 89 a.m. peak hour, 109 p.m. peak hour, and 1,164 daily trips. Even under this scenario, results of the year 2017 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating within an acceptable range or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under the alternate development scenario. In addition, once again under this heightened use scenario, no significant side - street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the alternate development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements would not be required under year 2017 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. SRF Consulting updated their traffic study from the 2015 approvals process to include the proposed daycare program and traffic use. Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the field or traffic simulation at the study intersections. FACILITY OPERATIONS Ebenezer- Proposed Operator The proposed operator of our senior housing community is Ebenezer which is an affiliate of the Fairview Health System. This affiliation with Fairview provides substantial programmatic support and care options for community residents. We expect rapid change in senior care over the next 5 — 10 years as senior housing continues to evolve from a focus on simply housing and hospitality to a more integrated delivery of medical and social care. We believe Ebenezer will be our best option to provide high quality care alternatives for our residents. Ebenezer currently operates our 115-unit senior housing community in Saint Louis Park (Towerlight on Wooddale) and is the proposed operator for the 137-unit senior housing community we are building in Eagan which recently received final city approvals. Ebenezer is the second largest provider of senior living in Minnesota, and had $72.7 million of total operating revenue in 2013. Ebenezer operates 60 communities and manages more than 5,000 units throughout its portfolio in Minnesota. The portfolio includes Independent Living Communities, Assisted Living Communities, Memory Care Communities, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Transitional Care Centers, Adult Day Programs, and Child Care Programs. For more than 90 years, Ebenezer has helped older adults make their lives more independent, healthful, meaningful and secure by creating opportunities for residents to live vibrantly, and participate in the daily fabric of life. The City of Chanhassen Public Benefits of Senior Housing & Child Care A Day Care Center in an Assisted -Living Facility Consider Ebenezer Ridges Day Care Center in Burnsville, Minn. This nondescript establishment is recognized locally as the preeminent program for toddlers and has a waiting list that befits its status, despite a small nonprofit budget. To what does Ridges attribute its success? The center became special when it decided to move inside an assisted -living facility. Now, the kids have daily access to surrogate grandparents to teach and support them. Trent Stamp, Next Avenue Contributor to Forbes SEPT. 26, 2016 The proposed senior community will benefit the public by providing senior housing for the area so that seniors who have spent their lives in Chanhassen and the surrounding communities remain in the area. Many local seniors will be attracted by the health benefits of a senior housing community as an attractive alternative to the isolation of living alone and the burden of maintaining a home. The proposed facility will help to meet the current housing needs of seniors in the immediate area (several neighbors are on senior housing waiting lists), while also helping to meet the anticipated needs of unmet demand in the near future as projected by a recent independent market study. Senior Living is a great community partner— not only creating a place where people come to volunteer, but also housing people who are interested in contributing back to their surrounding community. Senior Housing residents participate in local churches, volunteer opportunities, and engage in the greater community. Senior Housing, and specifically the programs and activities promoted by Ebenezer, also support local economic development since seniors typically prefer to shop in their familiar community. In addition, Ebenezer brings stable, high quality jobs to the communities in which they operate. There is also no better neighbor than a senior citizen. They are light on the land, streets and park systems, yet senior communities create significant tax base without burdening infrastructure and school systems. Ebenezer prefers larger senior housing communities like the proposed Mission Hills Senior Living since operational efficiencies are gained through larger senior housing developments when compared to smaller ones. Some of the operating benefits of a larger building are listed below: i. A larger facility can afford to offer a broader range of healthcare services, options, and amenities to Chanhassen seniors while limiting disruptive moves from one facility to another for additional care. ii. Creating a larger pool of care staff helps to support stable services for our residents. More hours of care and therefore staffing can be offered to provide more consistent employment, rather than a lot of part-time positions that are more difficult to fill with qualified care givers. This is expected to be increasingly important if the current shortage of qualified nurses continues, as we expect, as our population ages. iii. A larger building allows for more competitive wages and benefits at all levels of staff which typically translates to better care for our residents. iv. A larger facility offers more apartment options, which reduces the chance that families have to split up (i.e. one spouse needs Memory Care and the other can live in an Independent Unit, all under one roof) Additionally, this type of project also provides the public benefit of encouraging a turnover of single family housing in the area. When seniors move into these communities, neighborhoods typically experience younger families moving into the formerly senior owned housing stock which helps to revitalize these neighborhoods. Finally, in addition to construction jobs, Mission Hills Senior Living is expected to employ many people on site as care is provided to our residents 24 hours a day. The building is projected to employ over 50 individuals (FTEs) in a combination of full and part time positions. Mission Hills Senior Living Center and the City of Chanhassan 2030 Comprehensive Plan Following guidance from the City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan; the Mission Hills Senior Living Center addresses the Main Goal of: Achieving a mixture of development which will assure a high quality of life and a reliable tax goal: base. The Mission Hills Senior Living Center also accommodates and supports many of the policies that support the Main Goal of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, including: The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide for a full range of housing opportunities. These opportunities require that adequate land be designated for medium and high -density land uses to ensure that the goal of housing diversity can be met regardless of temporary market fluctuations. Geotechnical Evaluation Report Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8637-8655 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. O (/ " R a ro, PE, PG Vice Pr"' ent License Number: 18221 November 18, 2014 ProjectB14-07818 Braun Intertec Corporation s%u n n i s r,rr �� GG R. Jqk & LIC,Et�esp PR!:' L �` 9T 16221 CSO`'.: BRAUN INTERTEC The Science You Build Co. November 18, 2014 Mr. Michael Hoagberg Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC 17550 Hemlock Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: Geotechnical Evaluation Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8637 — 8655 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Mr. Hoagberg: Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Project B14-07818 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com We are pleased to present this Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the new senior housing project located in Chanhassen, Minnesota. Thank you for making Braun Intertec your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please call Jake Wotczak at 952.995.2382 or Gregg Jandro at 952.995.2270. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION FacobEIT Staff Engineer G eg�. Jan r , PE, PG Vice President —Principal Engineer c: Eric Reiners; Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. A.1/EOF: Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 A.1. Project Description..............................................................................................................1 A.2. Purpose................................................................................................................................1 A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents..........................................................1 A.4. Site Conditions.....................................................................................................................2 A.S. Scope of Services.................................................................................................................2 B. Results ..............................................................................................................................................3 B.1. Exploration Logs..................................................................................................................3 B.l.a. Log of Boring Sheets...............................................................................................3 B.l.b. Geologic Origins.....................................................................................................3 B.2. Geologic Profile...................................................................................................................3 B.2.a. Geologic Materials.................................................................................................3 B.2.b. Topsoil....................................................................................................................3 B.2.c. Fill...........................................................................................................................4 B.2.d. Organic Deposits....................................................................................................4 B.2.e. Glacial Deposits......................................................................................................4 B.2.f. Groundwater..........................................................................................................4 B.3. Laboratory Test Results.......................................................................................................5 C. Basis for Recommendations.............................................................................................................5 C.1. Design Details......................................................................................................................5 C.l.a. Building Structure Loads........................................................................................5 C.l.b. Pavements and Traffic Loads.................................................................................6 C.l.c. Anticipated Grade Changes....................................................................................6 C.l.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information........................................................6 C.2. Design and Construction Considerations............................................................................6 D. Recommendations...........................................................................................................................7 D.1. Building and Pavement Subgrade Preparation...................................................................7 D.l.a. Excavations.............................................................................................................7 D.l.b. Excavation Oversizing.............................................................................................9 D.l.c. Excavation Side Slopes...........................................................................................9 D.l.d. Excavation Dewatering...........................................................................................9 D.1.e. Selecting Excavation Backfill and Additional Required Fill.....................................9 D.l.e.l. Wall Backfill Below Floor Slabs...............................................................10 D.1.f. Placement and Compaction of Backfill and Fill....................................................10 D.2. Spread Footings.................................................................................................................10 D.2.a. Embedment Depth...............................................................................................10 D.2.b. Subgrade Improvement.......................................................................................11 D.2.c. Net Allowable Bearing Pressure...........................................................................11 D.2.d. Settlement............................................................................................................11 D.2.e. Footings in Wall Backfill.......................................................................................11 D.2.f. Grade Supported Interior Slabs (Garage Floors)..................................................11 D.3. Below Grade Walls............................................................................................................12 D.3.a. Drainage Control..................................................................................................12 D.3.b. Selection, Placement, and Compaction of Backfill...............................................12 D.3.c. Configuring and Resisting Lateral Loads...............................................................13 Table of Contents (continued) Description Page D.4. Interior Slabs.....................................................................................................................14 D.4.a. Moisture Vapor Protection..................................................................................14 D.4.b. Randon.................................................................................................................14 D.S. Exterior Slabs.....................................................................................................................15 D.S.a. Isolated Footing and Piers....................................................................................16 D.6. Pavements.........................................................................................................................16 D.6.a. Engineered Fill......................................................................................................16 D.6.b. Subgrade Proofroll...............................................................................................17 D.6.c. Design Sections....................................................................................................17 D.6.d. Materials and Compaction...................................................................................17 D.6.e. Subgrade Drainage...............................................................................................18 D.7. Utilities..............................................................................................................................18 D.7.a. Subgrade Stabilization..........................................................................................18 D.7.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill................................................18 D.7.c. Corrosion Protection............................................................................................18 D.B. Construction Quality Control............................................................................................19 D.B.a. Excavation Observations......................................................................................19 D.B.b. Materials Testing..................................................................................................19 D.B.c. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll..............................................................................19 D.B.d. Cold Weather Precautions...................................................................................19 E. Procedures......................................................................................................................................20 E.1. Penetration Test Borings...................................................................................................20 E.2. Material Classification and Testing...................................................................................20 E.2.a. Visual and Manual Classification..........................................................................20 E.2.b. Laboratory Testing...............................................................................................20 E.3. Groundwater Measurements............................................................................................20 F. Qualifications..................................................................................................................................20 F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions..................................................................................20 F.1.a. Material Strata.....................................................................................................20 F.1.b. Groundwater Levels.............................................................................................21 F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility..........................................................................21 F.2.a. Plan Review..........................................................................................................21 F.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing...............................................................21 F.3. Use of Report .....................................................................................................................21 F.4. Standard of Care................................................................................................................22 Appendix Boring Location Sketch Log of Boring Sheets (ST-1 to ST-19) Descriptive Terminology BRAUN INTERTEC A. Introduction A.I. Project Description We understand Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC is planning to develop nine single level twin home villas, a 132-unit senior apartment building, and associated parking area on the vacant lot addressed 8637-8655 Great Plains Boulevard in Chanhassen, Minnesota. The lot is located near the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Minnesota State Highway 101 and U.S. Highway 212 in Chanhassen, Minnesota. A.2. Purpose The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation will be to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected exploration locations and evaluate their impact on the design and construction of the proposed development. A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents To facilitate our evaluation, we were provided with or reviewed the following information or documents: • We reviewed aerial photographs of the project area using Google Earth and Bing Maps. • We reviewed conceptual site plans indicating the location of the twin home villas and apartment building. The plans were provided by Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. (SRA) and were undated. • We reviewed the Surficial Geology Map for Hennepin County prepared by the University of Minnesota, Minnesota Geological Survey. The map is denoted as Atlas C-4, Plate 3 of 9, Surficial Geology, and is dated 1989. • We had conversations with Mr. Eric Reiners of SRA regarding various aspects of the project. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project 814-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 2 AA Site Conditions The site is currently undeveloped and generally vegetated with grasses, although the site is partially bordered with trees along the eastern boundary. Site elevations at the soil boring locations range between approximately 900 and 927. A.S. Scope of Services Our scope of services for this project was originally submitted as a Proposal to Mr. Michael Hoagberg of Chanhassen Senior Living Development, LLC. Tasks performed in accordance with our authorized scope of services included: • Performing a reconnaissance of the site to evaluate equipment access to exploration locations. • Staking and clearing exploration locations of underground utilities. • Performing six penetration test borings to 25 feet in the apartment building footprint, nine penetration test borings to 15 feet at the twin home villa locations, and four penetration test borings to 10 feet in drive lanes and parking lots. • Performing laboratory tests on selected penetration test samples. Preparing this report containing a CAD sketch, exploration logs, a summary of the geologic materials encountered, results of laboratory tests, and recommendations for structure subgrade preparation and the design of foundations, pavements, interior and exterior slabs, and utilities. Exploration locations and surface elevations at the exploration locations were determined using GPS (Global Positioning System) technology that utilizes the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOT's) permanent GPS Virtual Reference Network (VRN). Our scope of services was performed underthe terms of our September 1, 2013, General Conditions. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 3 B. Results B.1. Exploration Logs B.1.a. Log of Boring Sheets Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings are included in the Appendix. The logs identify and describe the geologic materials that were penetrated, and present the results of penetration resistance and other in -situ tests performed within them, laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples retrieved from them, and groundwater measurements. Strata boundaries were inferred from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because sampling was not performed continuously, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may also occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions. B.1.b. Geologic Origins Geologic origins assigned to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report were based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration resistance and other in -situ testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and (5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the past. B.2. Geologic Profile B.2.a. Geologic Materials The general geologic profile at the site consists generally of trace amounts of topsoil at most boring locations underlain by glacially deposited soils extending to the boring termination depths. The following subsections discuss the strata in more detail. B.2.b. Topsoil Silty sand topsoil with traces of organics and roots was encountered at the boring locations. Two of the borings had one to 1 1/2 feet of topsoil, however, the majority of the borings encountered only a trace to a few inches of topsoil. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 4 B.2.c. Fill One boring (ST-4) encountered a layer of sandy lean clay which is possibly a previously placed fill soil. This layer extended to about the four foot depth. 13.2.d. Organic Deposits Organic clay was encountered at ST-4 and ST-5 at depths ranging between approximately four and seven feet, and zero and fourfeet, respectively. These depths correspond to elevations between approximately 903 and 908. The organic clay was black and wet. 6.2.e. Glacial Deposits Glacial till consisting of sandy lean clay (CL) and clayey sand (SC) was encountered beneath the topsoil, possible fill, and organic clays. The clays soils ranged from rather soft to hard in consistency and the clayey sands were medium dense based on the encountered penetration resistances. B.2.f. Groundwater Groundwater was measured or estimated to be down approximately eight feet and 15 feet in Borings ST-1 and ST-11, respectively. These depths correspond to elevations 913.5 and 906 based on our reported datum. Groundwater was not encountered as other exploration borings were advanced. Due to the coincidence of groundwater and the sand seam encountered at approximately eight feet in Boring ST-1, and relatively shallow depth at which groundwater was observed, we suspect that the groundwater was perched. The depth/elevation at which perched groundwater accumulates seasonally and annually will likely vary. The groundwater level at boring ST-11 was measured or estimated to be down approximately 15 feet prior to borehole abandonment. Given the cohesive nature of the geologic materials encountered, however, it is likely that insufficient time was available for groundwater to seep into the boring and rise to its hydrostatic level. Piezometers or monitoring wells would be required to confirm if groundwater was present within the depths explored. Seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater should also be anticipated. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 5 13.3. Laboratory Test Results The moisture content of the selected soil samples were determined to vary from approximately 15.6 to 23.7 percent, indicating that the tested clayey soils were was likely near or above their probable optimum moisture content. Pocket Penetrometer tests were taken on select soil samples to estimate the unconfined compressive strengths of the soil samples tested. The results of these tests ranged from 1/2 to 3 1/2 tons per square foot (tsf). The individual test results can be found in the right hand margin of various log of boring sheets, opposite the soil sample tested. C. Basis for Recommendations C.I. Design Details The project development consists of nine twin home style villas and a 132-unit living complex. Structural plans for the project were not available at the time this report was prepared. The wood framed, slab -on -grade villas have planned finished floor elevations (FFEs) ranging between 914 and 917. The planned location of the villas is in the northern portion of the site where current elevations range between 908 and 924. The proposed apartment building is a four story wood framed structure over a precast plank main level with proposed FFE of 923. An underground garage is planned with a proposed elevation of 912. A single story wood framed wing addition is planned along the southern boundary of the apartment building. The wing has the same proposed underground garage and entry level elevations as the main apartment building. C.1.a. Building Structure Loads We have assumed that bearing wall loads associated with the twin home villas will not exceed two kips per lineal foot (klf); column loads will not exceed 35 kips per column. Loads associated with the main apartment building will not exceed six klf along bearing walls or 400 kips per column. The wing addition loads will not exceed four klf along bearing walls or 75 kips per column. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 6 CA.b. Pavements and Traffic Loads We have assumed that bituminous pavements, typical of residential neighborhoods, will be subjected to no more than 50,000 equivalent 18-kip single axle loads (ESALs) over an assumed design life of 20 years. C.S.c. Anticipated Grade Changes Existing ground surface elevations are within approximately three to seven feet of the proposed FFEs at the locations of the twin home villas. Elevations are within approximately two to 12 feet of the proposed basement level in proximity to the apartment structures. It is likely that the range of cuts and fills across the site could be as much as 18 feet. It is likely that several areas of the site will have cuts on the order of six to twelve feet while other areas will require fill on the order of three to six feet. C.l.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information We have attempted to describe our understanding of the proposed construction to the extent it was reported to us by others. Depending on the extent of available information, assumptions may have been made based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details, we should be notified. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses, and/or recommendations. C.2. Design and Construction Considerations The geologic materials encountered generally appear to be suitable for support of conventional spread footings, grade supported slabs, and pavements. The topsoil and organic clays encountered are not suitable to support fill and structures and are not suitable for use as engineered fill in the building pads or paved areas. Also, any soft or rather soft clays found in building pad areas should be subcut. In order to prevent differential settlement, areas of construction immediately adjacent to the tall walls of the proposed garage excavation will require backfill of granular material. Because it is not likely suitable granular material will be encountered during excavation and grading activities, they may need to be imported to the site. Due to the frost susceptible nature of the clay -rich soils present at anticipated exterior slab and pavement subgrade elevations, consideration should also be given to incorporating a granular subbase into the pavement sections. This will enhance subgrade drainage efforts and reduce the potential for pavement subgrades to become saturated and heave upon freezing; strength loss upon thawing will also be reduced. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 7 In some areas, the soils present at and just below the proposed foundation levels are sensitive to disturbance, particularly if they are wet. Contractors should select equipment and construction techniques that minimize soil disturbance. Foundation soils that do become disturbed should be replaced with clean sand or clean crushed rock. It may be necessary to place a working surface of rock in excavations to reduce soils disturbance from construction traffic. Some contingency should be provided in project budgeting for using these imported materials in the excavation process. Typical subgrade preparation procedures as outlined in Section D.6 should be used for preparation of the new pavement areas. These procedures should be anticipated to primarily involve stripping of the existing topsoil and any organic clays or soft, wet clays, subcutting/filling to proposed grades, proofrolling the subgrade, and then moisture conditioning and compaction of loose or soft areas of exposed subgrade soils. D. Recommendations DA. Building and Pavement Subgrade Preparation D.1.a. Excavations We recommend removing the topsoil, organic clays, and any near surface soft wet clays from beneath the proposed building pads, pavement subgrades, and oversize areas. Based on the soil borings, excavation depths are expected to range from approximately six to 12 feet. Table 1 lists the expected excavation depths based on the penetration test borings. Note that at several locations, excavations to estimated footing and slab elevations will extend below the depths needed for soil correction. Table 1. Anticipated Excavation Depths for Villa and Apartment Construction. Boring Surface Elevation (ft) Proposed HE (ft) Anticipated Depth of Soil Correction Excavation (ft) Approximate Bottom Elevation (ft) ST-1 921.8 917 5 917 ST-2 918.9 916 4-6** 915-913 ST-3 912.5 915 1/2 912 ST-4 909.9 915 9-11** 901-899 BRAUN I NTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 8 Boring Surface Elevation (ft) Proposed HE (ft) Anticipated Depth of Soil correction Excavation (ft) Approximate Bottom Elevation (ft) ST-5 908.3 914 4-6** 904 1/2-902 1/2 ST-6 920.5 914 1/4 920 ST-7 922.3 915 1/4 9211/2 ST-8 921.9 916 1/4 9211/2 ST-9 924.1 917 1/4 923 3/4 ST-10 924.0 912 1/4 923 3/4 ST-11 921.0 912 1/4 920 3/4 ST-12 916.6 912 1/4 916 1/4 ST-13 915.7 912 5 910 1/2 ST-14 911.7 912 1/4 9111/2 ST-15 910.0 912 1/4 909 3/4 ST-16 900.0 911* 1/4 899 3/4 ST-17 927.1 920* 1/4 926 3/4 ST-18 924.1 916* 1/4 923 3/4 ST-19 914.8 913* 1/4 914 1/2 *Approximate finished pavement elevation. **Actual depth of soil correction to be determined in the field by a qualified geotechnical engineer or their representative. Excavation depths will vary between the borings. Portions of the excavations may also be deeper than indicated by the borings. Contractors should also be prepared to extend excavations in wet or fine- grained soils to remove disturbed bottom soils. Prior to placement of engineered fill or footings, we recommend the exposed soils in the bottoms of the excavations be surface compacted using a minimum of five passes over the foundation areas with a large sheep's foot compactor. This will increase the density of the underlying natural soils and provide a more BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 9 uniformly compacted base to support any additional fill or footings. We recommend this work be observed by a geotechnical engineer. The engineer may modify these recommendations if this compaction work causes upward movement (pumping) of groundwater or soil disturbance. D.l.b. Excavation Oversizing To provide lateral support to replacement backfill, additional required fill, and the structural loads they will support, we recommend oversizing (widening) the excavations 1 foot horizontally beyond the outer edges of the building perimeter footings, or pavement limits, for each foot the excavations extend below bottom -of -footing or pavement subgrade elevations. D.l.c. Excavation Side Slopes The onsite soils generally appear to consist of soils meeting OSHA Type B requirements, which indicate excavation side slopes should be constructed to lie back at a minimum horizontal to vertical slope of one to one or flatter. An OSHA -approved competent person or professional engineer should review the excavation conditions in the field. All excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, "Excavations and Trenches". This document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. Reference to these OSHA requirements should be included in project specifications. D.U. Excavation Dewatering Although perched water was only encountered in one of the borings, it is possible that water could be encountered in other parts of the site. If encountered, we recommend removing groundwater from the excavations. Because this site consists of predominately clayey soil, sumps and pumps can be used to control water. D.l.e. Selecting Excavation Backfill and Additional Required Fill If the bottoms of excavations are wet, we recommend the initial backfill soil consist of at least 2 feet of coarse sand having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing a #40 sieve, and less than 5 percent of the particles passing a #200 sieve. We anticipate that this material will need to be imported to the site. On -site soils free of organic soil can be considered for reuse as backfill and fill. The glacially deposited sandy lean clay, being fine-grained, will be more difficult to compact if wet or allowed to become wet, or if spread and compacted over wet surfaces. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 10 We recommend that granular subbase material for pavement support consist of sand having less than 12 percent of the particles by weight passing a #200 sieve. We anticipate that this material will also need to be imported. D.1.e.1. Wall Backfill Below Floor Slabs There are at least two locations where exterior and possibly interior slabs at the first floor elevation will be partially supported on relatively deep wall backfill zones. This occurs next to sections of the basement level walls. To reduce risks of differential settlement and possible slab damage, we recommend these areas of backfill consist of sand with less than 12%fines (material passing the #200 sieve). The sand soils beneath slabs should be compacted to at least 98% of their Standard Proctor density. Refer to section D.3 of this report for additional recommendations. D.l.f. Placement and Compaction of Backfill and Fill We recommend spreading backfill and fill in loose lifts of approximately six to 12 inches depending on the soil type and size of compactor used. We recommend compacting backfill and fill in accordance with the criteria presented below in Table 2. The relative compaction of utility backfill should be evaluated based on the structure below which it is installed, and vertical proximity to that structure. Table 2. Compaction Recommendations Summary Relative Compaction, percent Moisture Content Variance from Reference (ASTM D 698—Standard Proctor) Optimum, percentage Points -1 to +2 for Clay Soils Below foundations 98 ±3 for Sand Soils -1 to +3 for Clay Soils Below slabs 95 to 98* ±3 for Sand Soils -1 to +3 for Clay Soils Adjacent to Underground Garages 98 ±3 for Sand Soils Below pavements, within 3 feet of 100 -1 to +2 for Clay Soils subgrade elevations ±3 for Sand Soils Below pavements, more than 3 feet 95 -1 to +3 for Clay Soils below subgrade elevations ±3 for Sand Soils *98%compaction recommended for sand in wall backfill adjacent to tall garage walls (see D.l.e.l.) D.2. Spread Footings D.2.a. Embedment Depth For frost protection, we recommend embedding perimeter footings of the twin home villas, as well as structures outside the apartment building and wing addition such as canopies, retaining walls, etc., 42 inches below the lowest exterior grade. Interior footings maybe placed directly below floor slabs. We BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 11 recommend embedding footings not heated during winter construction, and other unheated footings associated with canopies, stoops, or sidewalks, 60 inches below the lowest exterior grade. D.2.b. Subgrade Improvement If small amounts of groundwater are present within footing excavations, or if the foot subgrade soils become disturbed prior to placing forms or reinforcement, we recommend subcutting the soft or wet clay and placing a 6-to 12-inch layer of clear rock. The clear rock will provide a stable working surface, and will allow for flow of water to a drain tile or sump. D.2.c. Net Allowable Bearing Pressure We recommend sizing spread footings to exert a net allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for the twin home villas and 4,000 psf for the apartment building. These values include a safety factor of at least 3.0 with regard to bearing capacity failure. The net allowable bearing pressures can be increased by one-third their value for occasional transient loads, but not for repetitive loads due to traffic, or for other live loads from snow or occupancy. D.2.d. Settlement Provided the foundation areas are prepared as discussed in this report, we estimate that total and differential settlements among the footings will amount to less than one and 1/2 inch, respectively, under the assumed loads. D.2.e. Footings in Wall Backfill It takes time for wall backfill to "settle -out' after it has been placed. Footings bearing in exterior wall backfill may behave differently than nearby footings bearing upon native soils. A construction delay of a month, or more, would allow the backfill to adjust, but this delay is not practical for many construction schedules. Alternately, the foundation elements could be extended down to native soils. While this approach is more expensive, it reduces the risk of excessive differential settlement between the building and footings supported in the backfill. Refer to sections D.1.e.1. and D.3. for additional recommendations for wall backfill. D.2.f. Grade Supported Interior Slabs (Garage Floors) The lower parking level floor will be supported upon the soils present at approximately 912 in Borings ST-10 to ST-15. These soils are competent but sensitive to disturbance, particularly when wet. If may be necessary to subcut these soils if they become disturbed. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 12 We recommend using a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 150 pounds per square inch per inch of deflection (pci) to design the slabs. D.3. Below Grade Walls D.3.a. Drainage Control We recommend installing subdrains behind the basement walls, adjacent to the wall footings, and below the slab elevation. Preferably, the subdrains should consist of perforated pipes embedded in washed gravel, which in turn is wrapped in filter fabric. Perforated pipes encased in a filter "sock' and embedded in washed gravel, however, may also be considered. We recommend routing the subdrains to a sump and pump capable of routing any accumulated groundwater to a storm sewer or other suitable disposal site. General waterproofing of basement walls surrounding occupied or potentially occupied areas is recommended even with the use of free -draining backfill because of the potential cost impacts related to seepage after construction is complete. D.3.b. Selection, Placement, and Compaction of Backfill Unless a drainage composite is placed against the backs of the exterior perimeter below -grade walls, we recommend that backfill placed within 2 horizontal feet of those walls consist of sand having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing a #40 sieve and less than 12 percent of the particles by weight passing a #200 sieve. Sand meeting this gradation will need to be imported. We recommend that the balance of the backfill placed against exterior perimeter walls also consist of sand, though it is our opinion that the sand may contain up to 20 percent of the particles by weight passing a #200 sieve. Clay is not recommended as wall backfill where higher elevation slabs will rely on the backfill for support. However, if clay must be considered in areas not supporting slabs to make up the balance of the below - grade wall backfill (assuming a drainage composite or sand is placed against the backs of the walls), post - compaction consolidation of the clay occurring under its own weight can be expected to continue beyond the end of construction. The magnitude of consolidation could amount to between 1 and 3 percent of the clay backfill thickness, orwall height, and if not accommodated could cause slabs to settle unfavorably or be damaged. Should lean clay still be considered for use as backfill, however, we further recommend that: BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 13 The bottoms of the excavations required for below -grade wall construction are wide enough to accommodate compaction equipment. Backfill is placed at moisture contents at least equal to, but not more than three percentage points above, its optimum moisture content. Backfill is placed in loose lifts no thicker than 6 inches prior to compaction. The relative compaction of the backfill is measured through density testing at intervals not exceeding one test per 50 horizontal feet for each vertical foot of backfill placed. We recommend a walk behind compactor be used to compact the backfill placed within about 5 feet of the retaining walls. Further away than that, a self-propelled compactor can be used. Compaction criteria for below -grade walls should be determined based on the compaction recommendations provided above in Section D.1. Exterior backfill not capped with slabs or pavement should be capped with a low -permeability soil to limit the infiltration of surface drainage into the backfill. The finished surface should also be sloped to divert water away from the walls. D.3.c. Configuring and Resisting Lateral Loads Below -grade wall design can be based on active earth pressure conditions if the walls are allowed to rotate slightly. If rotation cannot be tolerated, then design should be based on at -rest earth pressure conditions. Rotation up to 0.002 times the wall height is generally required when walls are backfilled with sand`. Rotation up to 0.02 times the wall height is required when walls are backfiilled with clay. To design for sand backfill, excavations required for wall construction should be wide enough and flat enough so that sand is present within a zone that (1) extends at least two horizontal feet beyond the bottom outer edges of the wall footings (the wall heel, not the stem) and then (2) rises up and away from the wall at an angle no steeper than 60 degrees from horizontal. We anticipate these geometric conditions will be met if the excavations meet OSHA requirements for the types of soils likely to be exposed in the excavation, and the wall footings are cast against wood forms rather than any portion of the excavation. Recommended equivalent fluid pressures for wall design based on active and at -rest earth pressure conditions are presented below in Table 3. Assumed wet unit backfill weights, and internal friction angles are also provided. The recommended equivalent fluid pressures in particular assume a level backfill with no surcharge —they would need to be revised for sloping backfill or other dead or live loads that are BRAUN iNTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 14 placed within a horizontal distance behind the walls that is equal to the height of the walls. Our design values also assume that the walls are drained so that water cannot accumulate behind the walls. Table 3. Recommended Below -Grade Wall Design Parameters Equivalent Fluid Equivalent Fluid Pressure, Active Pressure, At -Rest Wet Unit Weight Friction Angle Case Case Backfill (pcf) (deg) (pcf) (pcf) Sand 120 33 35 50 Clay 120 26 50 70 Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the retaining wall footings, and by sliding resistance along the bottoms of the wall footings. We recommend assuming a passive pressure equal to 300 pcf and a sliding coefficient equal to 0.50. These values are un-factored. DA Interior Slabs D.4.a. Moisture Vapor Protection If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, consideration should be given to placing a vapor retarder or vapor barrier immediately beneath the slab. Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor retarder or barrier beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage, but this practice risks trapping water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. Regardless of where the vapor retarder or barrier is placed, floor covering manufacturers should be consulted regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or barrier to preserve warranty assurances. D.4.b. Randon In preparation for radon mitigation systems under residential structures, we recommend that slabs on grade be constructed over a layer of gas permeable material consisting of a minimum of 4 inches of either clean aggregate, or sand overlain with a geotextile matting suitable for venting the subgrade. The clean aggregate material should consist of sound rock no larger than 2 inches and no smaller than 1/4 inch. Sand should have less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing a #40 sieve and less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a #200 sieve. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 15 Above the gas permeable aggregate or sand, a polyethylene sheeting (6 mil minimum) should be placed. The sheeting should be properly lapped and penetrations through the sheeting sealed. Penetrations through the slab and foundation walls should also be sealed. D.S. Exterior Slabs All or some of the exterior slabs will be underlain with mostly sandy lean clays and lean clays which are considered to be moderately to highly frost susceptible. Soils of this type can retain moisture and heave upon freezing. In general, this characteristic is not an issue unless these soils become saturated due to surface runoff or infiltration or are excessively wet in -situ. Once frozen, unfavorable amounts of general and isolated heaving of the soils and related surface features could also develop. This type of heaving could impact design drainage patterns and the performance of the paved areas or exterior slabs, as well as any isolated exterior footings and piers. To address most of the heave related issues, we recommend the general site grades and grades for surface features be set to direct surface drainage away from buildings, across large paved areas and away from walkways to limit the potential for saturation of the subgrade and any subsequent heaving. General grades should also have enough "slope" to tolerate potential larger areas of heave which may not fully settle when thawed. Even small amounts of frost -related differential movement at walkway joints or cracks can create tripping hazards. Several subgrade improvement options can be explored to address this condition. The most conservative and potentially most costly subgrade improvement option to help limit the potential for heaving, but not eliminate it, would be to remove any frost -susceptible soils present below the exterior slabs "footprint' down to the bottom -of -footing grades or to a maximum depth of five feet below subgrade elevations, whichever is less. We recommend the resulting excavation then be refilled with sand or sandy gravel having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing the #40 sieve and less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a #200 sieve. Another subgrade improvement option would be to build in a transition zone between those soils considered to be frost -susceptible and those that are not to somewhat control where any differential movement may occur. Such transitions could exist between exterior slabs and pavements, between entry way slabs and sidewalks, and along the sidewalks themselves. For this option, the frost -susceptible soils in critical areas would be removed to a depth of at least five feet below grade as discussed above. The excavation below the footprint of the sidewalks or other slabs would then be sloped upward at a gradient no steeper than 3:1(horizontal:vertical) toward the less critical areas. The bottom of the excavation should then be sloped toward the center so that any water entering the excavation could be quickly drained to the deepest area for removal. In the deepest areas of the excavation, a series of perforated drainpipes will need to be installed to collect and dispose of surface water infiltration and/or BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 16 groundwater that could accumulate within the backfill. The piping would need to be connected to a storm sewer or a sump to remove any accumulated water. If the water is not removed, it is our opinion this option will not be effective in controlling heave. Regardless of what is done to the walkway or pavement area subgrade, it will be critical the end -user develop a detailed maintenance program to seal and/or fill any cracks and joints that may develop during the useful life of the various surface features. Concrete and bituminous will experience episodes of normal thermo-expansion and thermo-contraction during its useful life. During this time, cracks may develop and joints may open up, which will expose the subgrade and allow any water flowing overland to enter the subgrade and either saturate the subgrade soils or to become perched atop it. This occurrence increases the potential for heave due to freezing conditions in the general vicinity of the crack orjoint. This type of heave has the potential to become excessive if not addressed as part of a maintenance program. Special attention should be paid to areas where dissimilar materials abut one another, where construction joints occur and where shrinkage cracks develop. D.S.a. Isolated Footing and Piers Soils classifying as "silt' (USCS symbols ML or MH), "clay" (CL or CH), or as being "silty" or "clayey" (including but not limited to SP-SM, SC-SM, SM or SC), have the potential for adhering to poured concrete or masonry block features built through the normal frost zone. In freezing conditions, this soil adhesion could result in the concrete or masonry construction being lifted out of the ground. This lifting action is also known as heave due to adfreezing. The potential for experiencing the impacts of adfreezing increases with poor surface drainage in the area of below grade elements, in areas of poorly compacted clayey or silty soils and in areas of saturated soils. To limit the impacts of adfreeze, we recommend placing a low friction separation barrier, such as high density insulation board, between the backfill and the element. Extending isolated piers deeper into the frost -free zone, enlarging the bottom of the piers and then providing tension reinforcement can also be considered. Recommendations for specific foundation conditions can be provided as needed. D.6. Pavements D.6.a. Engineered Fill Fill needed to reach pavement subgrade should be placed in thin lifts not exceeding 12 inches. The engineered fill placed in paved areas should be compacted to at least 100 percent of Standard Proctor maximum dry density and within one percent of the optimum moisture content when present within the upper three feet of pavement subgrade. Below the upper three feet, the compaction level may be reduced to 95 percent of Standard Proctor maximum dry density and the moisture content should be BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 17 within three percent of optimum moisture content. Compaction tests should be taken to evaluate the contractor's method of fill placement. D.6.b. Subgrade Proofroll Prior to placing aggregate base material, we recommend proof -rolling pavement subgrades to determine if the subgrade materials are loose, soft, or weak, and in need of further stabilization, compaction or subexcavation, and recompaction or replacement. A second proofroll should be performed afterthe aggregate base material is in place, and prior to placing bituminous or concrete pavement. D.6.c. Design Sections Laboratory tests to determine an R-value for pavement design were not included in the scope of this project. Based on the clay subgrade, however, it is our opinion that an R-value of 12 can be assumed for design purposes. For exclusively auto parking, we recommend 3 inches of bituminous over 6 inches of Class 5 aggregate base. For drive lanes that will have occasional trucktraffic, we recommend a pavement section of 4 inches of bituminous over 10 inches of Class 5 aggregate base. Bus traffic areas (if any) should have a minimum of 6 inches of bituminous over 12 inches of aggregate base. These pavement designs also assume that the aggregate base is properly drained. For enhanced longterm performance, consideration should be given to incorporating a 12 inch sand subgrade into the design, especially in drive lanes. If a 12 inch sand subgrade is considered the drive lane section could be reduced to 31/2 inches of asphalt and six inches of Class 5 aggregate. The above pavement designs are based upon a 20-year performance fife. This is the amount of time before major reconstruction is anticipated. This performance life assumes maintenance, such as seal coating and crack sealing, is routinely performed. The actual pavement life will vary depending on variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance. D.6.d. Materials and Compaction We recommend specifying crushed aggregate base meeting the requirements of Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Specification 3138 for Class S. We recommend that the bituminous wear and base courses meet the requirements of Specifications 2360, Type SP. We recommend the aggregate gradations for the asphalt mixes meet Gradation B for the base course and Gradation B or A for the surface course. Gradation A contains a smaller aggregate size than Gradation B and will provide a surface with less visible aggregate which is desirable for some owners. We recommend the Performance Graded Asphalt cement be a PG 58-28. (If additional resistance to rutting, scuffing and dimpling is desired, we BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 18 recommend utilizing a PG 64-28. If additional resistance to cold weather cracking is desirable, we recommend utilizing a PG 58-34.) We recommend that the aggregate base be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor dry density. We recommend that the bituminous pavement be compacted to at least 92 percent of the maximum theoretical Rice density. We recommend specifying concrete for pavements that has a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 4,000 psi, and a modulus of rupture (Mr) of at least 600 psi. We also recommend Type I cement meeting the requirements of ASTM C 150. We recommend specifying five to eight percent entrained airfor exposed concrete to provide resistance to freeze -thaw deterioration. We also recommend using a water/cement ratio of 0.45 or less for concrete exposed to deicers. D.6.e. Subgrade Drainage We recommend installing perforated drainpipes throughout pavement areas at low points and about catch basins. The drainpipes should be placed in small trenches extended at least 8 inches below the granular subbase layer — or aggregate base material where no subbase is present. D.7. Utilities D.7.a. Subgrade Stabilization We anticipate that utilities can be installed per manufacturer bedding requirements. If localized soft areas are encountered at pipe invert elevations, we recommend placing a stabilizing aggregate beneath the pipe. The depth of the aggregate bedding will vary, however, a minimum of six inches and a maximum of two feet is commonly used. D.7.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill We recommend selecting, placing and compacting utility backfill in accordance with the recommendations provided above in Section D.1. D.7.c. Corrosion Protection The soil borings indicated the site consists predominately of clay soils. These soils are considered slightly to moderately corrosive to metallic conduits. We recommend wrapping metallic pipe that is in contact with clayey soils or if clayey soils are placed as backfill around the pipe. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project 814-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 19 D.B. Construction Quality Control D.8.a. Excavation Observations We recommend having a geotechnical engineer observe all excavations related to subgrade preparation and spread footing, slab -on -grade, and pavement construction. The purpose of the observations is to evaluate the competence of the geologic materials exposed in the excavations, and the adequacy of required excavation oversizing. D.8.b. Materials Testing We recommend density tests be taken in wall backfill and additional required fill placed below spread footings, slab -on -grade construction, and below pavements. We recommend Marshall tests on bituminous mixes to evaluate strength and air voids, and density tests to evaluate compaction. We also recommend slump, air content, and strength tests of portland cement concrete. D.8.c. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll We recommend that proofrolling of the pavement subgrades be observed by a geotechnical engineer to determine if the results of the procedure meet project specifications, or delineate the extent of additional pavement subgrade preparation work. D.8.d. Cold Weather Precautions If site grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas priorto additional grading. No fill should be placed on frozen subgrades. No frozen soils should be used as fill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM C 94. Concrete should not be placed on frozen subgrades. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is attained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below footings. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 20 E. Procedures E.1. Penetration Test Borings The penetration test borings were drilled with a truck -mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow -stem auger. The borings were performed in accordance with ASTM D 1586. Penetration test samples were taken at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals. Actual sample intervals and corresponding depths are shown on the boring logs. E.2. Material Classification and Testing E.2.a. Visual and Manual Classification The geologic materials encountered were visually and manually classified in accordance with ASTM Standard Practice D 2488. A chart explaining the classification system is attached. Samples were placed in jars and returned to our facility for review and storage. E.2.b. Laboratory Testing The results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples are noted on or follow the appropriate attached exploration logs. The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM procedures. E.3. Groundwater Measurements The drillers checked for groundwater as the penetration test borings were advanced, and again after auger withdrawal. The boreholes were then backfilled or allowed to remain open for an extended period of observation as noted on the boring logs. Qualifications F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions F.l.a. Material Strata Our evaluation, analyses, and recommendations were developed from a limited amount of site and subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from BRAUN I NTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC Project B14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 21 exploration locations continuously with depth, and therefore strata boundaries and thicknesses must be inferred to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and can be expected to vary in depth, elevation, and thickness away from the exploration locations. Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until additional exploration work is completed, or construction commences. If any such variations are revealed, our recommendations should be re-evaluated. Such variations could increase construction costs, and a contingency should be provided to accommodate them. F.1.1b. Groundwater Levels Groundwater measurements were made underthe conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. It should be noted that the observation periods were relatively short, and groundwater can be expected to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications, and other seasonal and annual factors. F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility F.2.a. Plan Review This report is based on a limited amount of information, and a number of assumptions were necessary to help us develop our recommendations. It is recommended that our firm review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications, and evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes have affected the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the designs and specifications. F.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing It is recommended that we be retained to perform observations and tests during construction. This will allow correlation of the subsurface conditions encountered during construction with those encountered by the borings, and provide continuity of professional responsibility. F.3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of the parties to which it has been addressed. Without written approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses, and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects. BRAUN INTERTEC Chanhassen Senior Living Developer, LLC ProjectB14-07818 November 18, 2014 Page 22 FA Standard of Care In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. BRAUN INTERTEC Appendix BRAUN INTERTEC PMoI/mumnmw.ownnlnvmH eaw w T9UNK r + I ,�;�,. II ■■p�I � . I e,;p0. , ! `.(`fir O y1 G,y 4. q t SOIL BORING LOCATION SKETCH GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION CHANHASSEN SENIOR HOUSING PHO'ECT 86218 GREAT PLAINS BOULEVARD CHANHPSSEN, MINNESOTA L 8 a � C BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: STA GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/17/14 SCALE: V. =4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL MC qp Tests or Notes 921.8 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) % tsf SM .' SILTY SAND, fine-grained, trace roots, dark brown, Benchmark: 920.8 1.0 moist. (Topsoil Fill) Elevations were obtained using CL — GPS and the State SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown, wet, rather soft. 4 of Minnesota's — (Glacial Till) permanent base 917.8 4.0 station network. CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown, wet, medium — to very stiff. (Glacial Till) 8 20 1/2 I 12 S_Z I Layers of Poorly Graded Sand at 8 feet. An open triangle in _ the water level (W L) column indicates the depth 12 at which — groundwater was observed while — drilling. 16 Groundwater levels — fluctuate. 17 1 3/4 905.8 16.0 1 END OF BORING. Water observed at 8 feet with 7 feet of hollow -stem auger — in the ground. — Water not observed with 14 1/2 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground. i Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. D 1'1-V /816 D,dW iiinei wO wFWIi uu, NlNi iuyw irvm .wi+w ". Y"tl "• BRAU Na INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-2 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/17/14 SCALE: 1" =4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF W L MC qp Tests or Notes 918.9 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 ar D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) % tsf SM SILTY SAND, fine-grained, trace Gravel, dark brown, — moist. 917.4 1.5 (Topsoil) _ CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, brown, wet, rather soft. (Glacial Till) 5 914.9 4.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown, wet, rather soft to stiff. (Glacial Till) 5 7 22 8 1 1 /2 _ 12 1 314 13 11/2 902.9 16.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. B14-07818 Braun Intertec Corporation, Bloomington MN 55438 s l-2 Pagel or l BRAUN0 INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-3 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: B. Kammermeier METHOD: 3 1l4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/17/14 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL MC qp Tests or Notes 912.5 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 cr D2487, Rack-USACE EM7110-1-2908) % tsf SM CL SILTY SAND, fine -to medium -grained, trace roots, dark brown, moist. — (Topsoil) SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown, wet, medium. — (Possible Fill) 6 3/4 908.5 4.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown to gray, wet, — medium to stiff. i (Glacial Till) 8 19 2 i— i � 11 1 i 12 _ 14 898.5 14.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, gray, very stiff. _ (Glacial Till) 17 896.5 16.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Water not observed to cave-in depth of 12 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. i i — r B14-0/818 Braun Intenec Gorporalion, Bloomington MN b 00 o o ws< 1 u, 1 BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-4 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: B. Kammenneier METHOD: 3 1W HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/17/14 SCALE: V, =4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF W L MC qp Tests or Notes 909.9 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rack-USACE EM1110-1-2908) % tsf SM SILTY SAND, fine -to medium -grained, trace roots, with Gravel, gray, dry. — CL (Topsoil) SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown to gray, wet. — (Possible Fill) 6 20 905.9 4.0 OL — ORGANIC CLAY, black, wet. — (Swamp Deposit) _ 5 1 1 /4 902.9 7.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, dark gray, wet, rather soft _ (Glacial Till) 5 24 900.9 9.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown to gray, wet, rather soft to rather stiff. (Glacial Till) 5 1 1 /2 9 895.9 14.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, gray, wet, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) 9 1 3/4 893.9 16.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Water not observed to cave-in depth of 10 feet i— immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. i i- 0 B14-07818 Braun Intertec corporation, moommgton MN �an o I -a pay. , of , BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-5 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: B. Kammermeier METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10117/14 SCALE: 1" =4' Elev. feet Depth feet Description of Materials BPF WL MC qp Tests or Notes 908.3 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock -USAGE EM1110-1-2908) % tsf SM — _ _ SILTY SAND, fine -to medium -grained, trace roots, with Gravel, gray, dry. (Topsoil) — OL ORGANIC LEAN CLAY, black, wet. — — — (Swamp Deposit) 5 904.3 4.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, gray, wet, rather soft. — (Glacial Till) 5 3/4 902.3 6.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown to gray, wet, rather stiff. _ I i (Glacial Till) 9 20 31/2 11 21/2 896.3 12.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, gray, wet, rather stiff to stiff. 11 (Glacial Till) 14 1/2 3 892.3 16.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Water not observed to cave-in depth of 11 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backflled with cuttings. B14-07818 Braun Intertec Corporafion, Bloomington MN 55438 5T-5 page 1 of 1 ( BRAUNm INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-6 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: B. Kammermeier METHOD: 31/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/16/14 SCALE: 1" =4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL MC qp Tests or Notes 920.5 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 ar D2487, Rock -USAGE EM1110-1-2908) % tsf SM CL SILTY SAND, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) — SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, stiff. — (Glacial Till) 14 20 16 31/4 I- 15 i 14 21/2 _ 16 16 904.5 16.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — I Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. b14-0/618 umun Intenea l rpIX uan, bIwmington MN p ju o ro Wye i u, i BRAUNM INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-7 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 31/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 10/16/14 SCALE: 1" =4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL MC clip Tests or Notes 922.3 0.0 Symbol (S- id-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rods-USACE EM1110-1-2908) % tsf SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium -grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. _ CL (Topsoil) SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown to gray, wet, — medium to rather stiff. 6 — (Glacial Till) 12 16 I 13 21/2 13 _ 12 2 3/4 13 31/4 906.3 16.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. B14-07818 Braun Intertec Corporation, Bloomington MN 55438 ST-7 page i of 1 BRAU NM INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-8 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 31/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/16/14 SCALE: Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF W L MC qp Tests or Notes 921.9 0.0 Symbol (SoikASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908I % tsf SM SILTY SAND, fine -to medium -grained, trace roots, brown, moist. — CL (Topsoil) SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium — to rather stiff. 6 21 2 1 /4 — (Glacial Till) i 10 i 9 3 1 /2 909.9 12.0 SC CLAYEY SAND, fine -to medium -grained, brown, wet, ' medium dense. 14 (Glacial Till) 907.9 14.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, wet, very stiff. — (Glacial Till) 19 3 905.9 16.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. B14-07818 Braun Inlertec Corporation, Bloomington MN 55438 Si-8 Pagel all BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-9 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 31/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/16/14 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL MC qp Tests or Notes 924.1 0.0 Symbol (Sal-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock -USAGE EM1110-1-2908) % tsf 01, SM SILTY SAND, fine -to medium -grained, brown, moist. (Topsoil) — CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium. — (Glacial Till) _ 6 1 112 920.1 4.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium to rather stiff. (Glacial Till) 8 I 10 19 21/2 11 _ 11 1 3/4 12 2 908.1 16.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. b14- 1818 Braun ntenec c rparanan, moomingmn MN ao4ca a , vase , u , BRAD Mm INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-10 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 3 114" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/16/14 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL qp Tests or Notes 924.0 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock -USAGE EM 1110-1-2908) tsf SM SILTY SAND, fine-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. (Topsoil) — CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, dark brown, wet, — medium. 921.0 3.0 (Glacial Till) 6 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium _ to stiff. (Glacial Till) 7 I 8 11 2 3/4 _ 14 15 21/4 905.0 19.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, gray, wet, stiff. — (Glacial Till) 14 14 898.0 26.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 25 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. B14-07818 Braun Inlertec Corporation, Bloomington MN 55438 8T-10 page 1 of 1 B Rau N" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-11 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/17/14 SCALE: ill = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF W L qp Tests or Notes 921.0 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 02487, Rock-LISACE EM1110-1-2908) tsf SM SILTY SAND, fine-grained, brown, moist. (Topsoil) — CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, wet, brown, medium. — (Glacial Till) 6 917.0 4.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium — to stiff. (Glacial Till) 7 21/4 I I g i 9 21/4 11 13 21/4 902.0 19.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, trace Cobble, gray, _ wet, very stiff to hard. (Glacial Till) 22 59 895.0 26.0 END OF BORING. Water observed at 24 1 /2 feet with 25 feet of hollow -stem — auger in the ground. — Water observed at 15 feet with 25 feet of hallow -stem auger in the ground. Boring immediately backfilled with bentonite grout. i— B14-07818 smun Intent corporation, mlo ingcon MN 55438 ­11 yayc , W, B RAU N'" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-12 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 31/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/16/14 SCALE: 1" =N Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL qp Tests or Notes 916.6 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 a D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) tsf SM CL SILTY CLAYEY SAND, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) — SANDY LEAN CLAY, brown, wet, medium. 913.6 3.0 6 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, rather _ stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) 10 I � i 10 21/2 10 15 14 2 898.6 18.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, gray, wet, very stiff. _ (Glacial Till) 20 17 890.6 26.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 25 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — i i— Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. Braun utrenac wwauon, uimmmgron mry a M o 1-1z � I u, BRAUHm INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: STA3 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/16/14 SCALE: T. =4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL qp Tests or Notes 915.7 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock -USAGE EM1110-1-2908) tsf SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium -grained, dark brown, wet. (Topsoil) — CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, soft to — medium. (Glacial Till) 3 7 3/4 2 909.7 6.0 SC CLAYEY SAND, fine -to medium -grained, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Till) I 12 906.7 9.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, rather Stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) 10 3 _ 11 11 , 13 21/4 11 889.7 26.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 25 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Boring immediately backflled with cuttings. B14-um18 Braun Intertm Garporaaon, dioomington MN �Jb o,-io page i oe i BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-14 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: B. Kammermeier METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/17114 SCALE: 1" = 4- Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF W L qp Tests or Notes 911.7 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) tsf SM SILTY SAND, fine -to medium -grained, trace Gravel and roots, gray, moist. — CL (Topsoil) SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown to gray, wet, — very stiff. 18 — (Glacial Till) 907.7 4.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown, wet, stiff to — very stiff. (Glacial Till) 20 I 15 3112 i 17 _ 18 18 3112 15 21/2 888.7 23.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, gray, wet, hard. _ (Glacial Till) 50/2" 3 1 /4 885.7 26.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 25 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Water not observed to cave-in depth of 18 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. B14-07818 Braun Intertec Corporation, Bloomington MN 55438 ST-14 page 1 or 1 B RAU N'" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-15 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: B. Kammermeier METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/17/14 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 910.0 0.0 Symbol (Sail-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium -grained, trace roots, gray, moist. — CL (Topsoil) SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace roots and Gravel, brown, wet, — 907.0 3.0 medium. (Glacial Till) 6 CL FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, with Gravel, brown, wet, rather _ stiff. — (Glacial Till) 11 903.0 7.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown to gray, wet, _ stiff to very stiff. 15 (Glacial Till) 16 _ 18 22 21 886.0 24.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, gray, wet, stiff. — (Glacial Till) 13 884.0 26.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 25 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Water not observed to cave-in depth of 18 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. H14-U/818 Braun InterteC UOrporannn, Bloominglon MN oo436 of-iu page i ai i BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-16 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: B. Kammermeier METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/17/14 SCALE: 1" =4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL qp Tests or Notes 900.0 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) tsf SM SILTY SAND„ fine- to medium -grained, trace roots, with Gravel, brown, moist. (Topsoil) — CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, dark brown to gray, — — wet, rather soft to medium. (Glacial Till) 5 1 3/4 6 893.0 7.0 13 891.0 9.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, brown, wet, stiff. (Glacial Till) CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, gray, wet, very stiff. (Glacial Till) 17 2 3/4 889.0 11.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 10 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Water not observed to Gave -in depth of 7 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. B14-07818 Braun Intertec Corporation, Bloomington MN bb438 a -it page i or 1 BRAUN" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-17 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 31/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/17/14 SCALE: 1" =4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF W L Tests or Notes 927.1 0.0 Symbol (Sail-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) SM SILTY SAND, fine-grained, with roots, brown, moist. (Topsoil) — CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium — to rather stiff. (Glacial Till) 7 9 � i 12 11 916.1 11.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 10 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. i i — B14-07818 Braun Intenec Corporation, Bloomington MN 55438 S -1 r page of! BRAD N'" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-18 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 10/17/14 SCALE: 1" =4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 924.1 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rack-USACE EM 111 t}1-2908) SM . SILTY SAND, fine-grained, brown, moist, medium. (Topsoil) — CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium. — (Glacial Till) 6 8 918.1 6.0 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, brown, wet, rather stiff. — (Glacial Till) I 9 10 913.1 11.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 10 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. B14-07818 Braun Intertec Corpwation, Bloomington MN 55438 5 i-i8 page i w i BRAU N" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project B14-07818 BORING: ST-19 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Chanhassen Senior Housing Project 8623-8635 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota DRILLER: R. Hansen METHOD: 3 1l4" HSA, Autchammer DATE: 1011N4 SCALE: 1" =4' Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF W L Tests or Notes 914.8 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium -grained, with Gravel, light brown, dry. — CL (Topsoil) SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown, wet, medium — to very stiff. 8 — (Glacial Till) 10 15 25 903.8 11.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 10 feet of hollow -stem auger in — the ground. — Boring immediately backfilled with cuttings. B14-07818 Braun Intertec Corporation, Bloomington MN 55438 ST-19 page 1 — ! BRAUN INTERTEC Descriptive Terminology of Soil Standard D 2487 - 00 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) Soils Classification Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Group Names Using Laboratory Tests Symbol Group Name ° u o Gravels Clean Gravels C.> 4 antl 1 < C : 3 ° GIN Well -graded gravelMt ° .a v More than 50 % of 5 % or less foes ` C„< 4 and/or 1 > C,> 3 ` GP Poorly graded gravel ° in m m coarse fraction Gravels with Fines Fines classify as MIL or MH GM Silty gravel d19 m �'u retained on Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel its ea o No.4 sieve More than l2%fines ` P n n Sands Clean Sands C.2 6 and 1 < C : 3 ` SW Well -graded sand ^ C.< 6 and/or 1 > Co> 3 ° SP Poody graded sand " ti 50% or more of 5% or less fines m ^ o coarse fraction passes Sands with Floes Fines classify as MIL or MH SM nd rP" Fines classify as CL or CH SC Cissand rs^ E No.4 sieve More than 12%' ` PI > 7 and plats on or above `A' line i CL a x ""Liquid <4 or plots below'A' Imel ML mwless u Silts and ClaysElnorganic limitPI man 50 Liquid limit -oven dred < 0 75OL day KOmanicsilt uid limit -not dried OL m eLi c siltPI plots on or above'A' line CH x I mm E Silts and clays PI plots below'A'line MH silt x ""o d zLiquid limitii Liquid limit -oven dried < 0 75OH clay PLi o 50 or more uid limit -not dred OH csilt m c Highly Organic Soils anic matter, dark in color and organicodor PT Peat a B wdonthematedalp niirgte3 n(75mm)sleve. b. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or bon, add `with cobbles or boulders or both' to group name. D10x0. it lied ochmins215% sang add Win sancrto group name. e. Gravels With 50 12% fines require dual symbols: GWGM walymded gravel with silt GWGC wdlyraded gravel wit day GP -GM poorly graded gavel wit silt GP -GC poorly graded gravel with clay f. It fines classify as CLW L, use dual symbol GC -GM or SC-SM. g. If fees are organic, add Wit organic times' to group came. h. If soil canters 215%gravel. add With gravel` to group name. i. Sandswith 5 012%fires require dualsymbels: SWSM well -graded send with silt SWSC wellgraded sand wah Gay SPSM Poody graded sarb wah silt SPSC poorly graded santl win day j. If Aftemerg limits plot in hatched area, sal is a CL-ML, silly day. k ftsal PCOMMS 10to29%plus No.200, add Wit sand'a Wit gmerwhicicverispeadominant I. Ifsdl wntdeea t 0%Pus No 2W, Predominantly sand.add-mW to group name. m If sal caaahx2t 0 plus No 200 predominantly gravel, Wit 'gravelly- to group came. n. PI 24 and plots on or above'A' line. o. PI <4 or plats W.'A' line_ p. PI plots on or above'A' [ine. q. PI We below'A' line. 60 60 a 40 X C 30 U y 20 IL 10 7 4 0 0 / / "IS, Vle aO G / V of MH or OH ML or OL - CL 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 Liquid Limit (LL) Laboratory Tests 70 60 90 100 110 DD Dry density, pet OC Organic content,% WD Wet density, pcf S Percent of saturation,% MC Natural moisture content, % SG Specificgravity LL Liquid limit, % C Cohesion, psf PL Plastic limit % 0 Angle of internal friction PI Plasticity index,% qu Unconfined compressive strength, psf P200 % passing 200 sieve qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf Particle Size Identification Boulders........... ............ over 12' Cobbles ............................... 3'to 12" Greve] Coarse . 3/4't03' Fine .................... _........ No. 4 to 3/4' Sand Coarse ............................ No. 4 W No. 10 Medium ........................... No. 10 to No. 40 Fine ................................. No. 40 to No. 200 Silt..........._............._...........<No. 200, PI<4 or below'A' line Clay .....................................< No. 200. PI24 and on or above'A' line Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ................................ 0 to 4 BPF Loose ....................................... 5 to 10 BPF Medium dense .....-- ............... 11 to 30 BPF Dense ...................................... 31 to 50 BPF Very dense ............................... over 50 BPF Consistency of Cohesive Soils Very soft ......._ .......................... 0 to 1 BPF Soft ....................................... 2 to 3 BPF Rather soft ............................... 4 to 5 BPF Medium .................................... 6 to 8 BPF Ramer stiff ...................... 9 to 12 BPF Stiff ....................................... 13 to 16 BPF Very stiff ................................... 17 to 30 BPF Hard ........ -- ............ -- ........ .,, over 30 BPF Drilling Notes Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 3 1/4'or 61/4' ID hollow -stem augers unless noted otherwise, Jetting waterwas used to dean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs. Standard penetration test borings are designated by the prefix 'ST" (Split Tube). All samples were taken with the standard 2'OD split -tube sampler, except where noted. Power auger borings were advanced by 4' or 6' diameter continuous - flight, solid -stem augers. Soil classifications and strata depths were in- ferred from disturbed samples augered to the surface and are, therefore, somewhat approximate. Power auger borings are designated by the prehx'B.' Hand auger borings were advanced manually with a 1 1/2' or 3 1/4' diameter augerand were limited to the depth from which the auger could be manually withdrawn. Hand auger borings are indicated by the prefix 'H' BPF: Numbers indicate blows perfect recorded in standard penetration test, also known as `N'value. The sampler was set 6' into undisturbed soil below the hollow -stem auger Driving resistances were then counted for second and third 6' increments and added to get BPF. Where they diRered significantly, they are reported in the following form: 2/12 for the second and third 6' increments, respectively. MIH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil underweight of hammer and Pods alone; driving not required. WR: WR indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required. TW indicates thin -walled (undisturbed) tube sample. Note: All tests were run in general accordance with applicable ASTM standards. I:f-v�►/dr1 2P Filtration as�%k PROPOSED AREA 6 Filtration Basin #4 0 PROPOSED AREA 5 O P OPOSED AREA 2 7P Filtration Basin #1 9 PROPOSED AREA 7 6P /tration Basin #3 O PROPOSED AREA 4 e�—� PROPOSED ARE5P PROPOSED AREA 1 Subcat Reach on Llnk Filtration Basin #2 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 4.507 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (PROPOSED AREA 1, PROPOSED AREA 2, PROPOSED AREA 3, PROPOSED AREA 4, PROPOSED AREA 5, PROPOSED AREA 6, PROPOSED AREA 7) 4.137 98 Roofs, HSG D (PROPOSED AREA 1, PROPOSED AREA 2, PROPOSED AREA 3, PROPOSED AREA 4, PROPOSED AREA 5, PROPOSED AREA 6, PROPOSED AREA 7) 8.644 89 TOTAL AREA 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 8.644 HSG D PROPOSED AREA 1, PROPOSED AREA 2, PROPOSED AREA 3, PROPOSED AREA 4, PROPOSED AREA 5, PROPOSED AREA 6, PROPOSED AREA 7 0.000 Other 8.644 TOTAL AREA 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HVdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (selected nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.507 0.000 4.507 >75% Grass cover, Good PROPO SED AREA 1, PROPO SED AREA 2, PROPO SED AREA 3, PROPO SED AREA 4, PROPO SED AREA 5, PROPO SED AREA 6, PROPO SED AREA 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.137 0.000 4.137 Roofs PROPO SED AREA 1, PROPO SED AREA 2, PROPO SED AREA 3, PROPO SED AREA 4, PROPO SED AREA 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Prepared by (enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Ground Covers (selected nodes) (continued) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.644 0.000 8.644 TOTAL AREA 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Pipe Listing (selected nodes) Line# Node In -Invert Out -Invert Length Slope n Diam/Width Height Inside -Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 1 P 907.25 906.92 82.0 0.0040 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 2 5P 915.00 895.00 543.0 0.0368 0.010 8.0 0.0 0.0 3 7P 895.25 895.00 50.0 0.0050 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Time span=0.01-260.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 26000 points x 4 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 1: Runoff Area=0.508 ac 0.82% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.17" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=0.99 cfs 0.049 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 2: Runoff Area=3.523 ac 55.87% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.98" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=11.16 cfs 0.582 of SubcatchmentPROPOSEDAREA 3: Runoff Area=1.146ac 50.20%Impervious Runoff Depth=1.90" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=3.49 cfs 0.181 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 4: Runoff Area=0.918 ac 40.87% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.76" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=2.60 cfs 0.135 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 5: Runoff Area=0.423 ac 59.64% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.04" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=1.37 cfs 0.072 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 6: Runoff Area=1.903 ac 47.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.86" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=5.69 cfs 0.296 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 7: Runoff Area=0.223 ac 23.55% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.50" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=0.55 cfs 0.028 of Pond 1 P: Filtration Basin #4 Peak Elev=912.68' Storage=462 cf Inflow=1.37 cfs 0.072 of Outflow=1.30 cfs 0.072 of Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Peak EIev=907.93' Storage=6,729 cf Inflow=7.03 cfs 0.502 of Primary=1.58 cfs 0.130 of Secondary=0.16 cfs 0.372 of Outflow=1.74 cfs 0.502 of Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 Peak EIev=918.19' Storage=3,873 cf Inflow=3.49 cfs 0.181 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Secondary=0.15 cfs 0.181 of Outflow=0.15 cfs 0.181 of Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 Peak EIev=911.71' Storage=2,901 cf Inflow=2.60 cfs 0.135 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Secondary=0.10 cfs 0.135 of Outflow=0.10 cfs 0.135 of Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 Peak EIev=906.76' Storage=14,258 cf Inflow=11.16 cfs 0.582 of Primary=0.96 cfs 0.582 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.96 cfs 0.582 of Total Runoff Area = 8.644 ac Runoff Volume = 1.343 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.86" 52.14% Pervious = 4.507 ac 47.86% Impervious = 4.137 ac 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD810.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 1: PROPOSED AREA 1 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 0.99 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.049 af, Depth= 1.17" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chan hassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Description 0.504 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.004 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.508 80 Weighted Average 0.504 80 99.18% Pervious Area 0.004 98 0.82% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 1: PROPOSED AREA 1 D RunoH ' ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87 Runoff Area=0.508 ac Runoff Volume=0.049 of Runoff Depth=1.17 Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 V O LL 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 2: PROPOSED AREA 2 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 11.16 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.582 af, Depth= 1.98" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionH ills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Description 1.555 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1.968 98 Roofs, HSG D 3.523 90 Weighted Average 1.555 80 44.13% Pervious Area 1.968 98 55.87% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 2: PROPOSED AREA 2 ❑ Runoff 10 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=3.523 ac e Runoff Volume=0.582 of Runoff Depth=1.98" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrSI 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 3: PROPOSED AREA 3 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 3.49 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.181 af, Depth= 1.90" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chanhassen Mission Hills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 0.571 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.575 98 Roofs, HSG D 1.146 89 Weighted Average 0.571 80 49.80% Pervious Area 0.575 98 50.20% Impervious Area N U Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 3: PROPOSED AREA 3 Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ RunoN 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrSI 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 4: PROPOSED AREA 4 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 2.60 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.135 af, Depth= 1.76" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chan hassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 0.543 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.375 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.918 87 Weighted Average 0.543 80 59.13% Pervious Area 0.375 98 40.87% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 4: PROPOSED AREA 4 Hydrograph ❑ RunoR Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hrS1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 5: PROPOSED AREA 5 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 1.37 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.072 af, Depth= 2.04" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chan hassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Descrintion 0.171 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.252 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.423 91 Weighted Average 0.171 80 40.36% Pervious Area 0.252 98 59.64% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 5: PROPOSED AREA 5 ❑ Runoff ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87' Runoff Area=0.423 ac Runoff Volume=0.072 of 1 Runoff Depth=2.04" Tc=5.0 min H CN=80198 `u 3 0 LL 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydrOCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 6: PROPOSED AREA 6 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 5.69 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.296 af, Depth= 1.86" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMission Hills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Description 0.994 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.910 98 Roofs. HSG D 1.903 89 Weighted Average 0.994 80 52.20% Pervious Area 0.910 98 47.80% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fUft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 6: PROPOSED AREA 6 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 02016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 7: PROPOSED AREA 7 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 0.55 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.028 af, Depth= 1.50" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chan hassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 0.171 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D _ 0.053 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.223 84 Weighted Average 0.171 80 76.45% Pervious Area 0.053 98 23.55% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 7: PROPOSED AREA 7 Hydrograph ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=0.223 ac Runoff Volume=0.028 of Runoff Depth=1.50" Tc=5.0 min CN=80198 80 100 120 140 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 3/1512017 HVdroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Pond 1P: Filtration Basin #4 Inflow Area = 0.423 ac, 59.64% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.04" for 2-yr event Inflow = 1.37 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.072 of Outflow = 1.30 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.072 af, Atten= 6%, Lag= 1.1 min Primary = 1.30 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.072 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 14 Peak Elev= 912.68' @ 12.05 hrs Surf.Area= 833 sf Storage= 462 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 88.4 min ( 864.4 - 776.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 912.00' 2,887 cf Custom Stage Data (PrismaticVisted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 912.00 520 0 0 913.00 979 750 750 914.00 1,580 1,280 2,029 914.50 1,851 858 2,887 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 907.25' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 82.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 907.25' / 906.92' S= 0.00407 Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 912.50' 19.1" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 912.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=1.29 cfs @ 12.05 hrs HW=912.68' TW=907.57' (Dynamic Tailwater) t1=Culvert (Passes 1.29 cfs of 6.81 cfs potential flow) 1 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 1.27 cfs @ 1.40 fps) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Pond 1P: Filtration Basin #4 ® Inflow ❑ Pnmary Inflow Area=0.423 ac Peak Elev=912.68' Storage=462 cf 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours( 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HVdroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Summary for Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Inflow Area = 2.326 ac, 49.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.59" for 2-yr event Inflow = 7.03 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.502 of Outflow = 1.74 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 0.502 af, Atten= 75%, Lag= 19.7 min Primary = 1.58 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 0.130 of Secondary = 0.16 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 0.372 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 907.93' @ 12.36 hrs Surf.Area= 7,101 sf Storage= 6,729 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 311.3 min ( 1,177.3 - 866.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 906.85' 11,055 cf Custom Stage Data (PrismaticVisted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 906.85 4,962 0 0 907.00 5,699 800 800 908.00 7,212 6,456 7,255 908.50 7,989 3,800 11,055 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 907.80' 15.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Secondary 906.85' 1.000 inlhr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=1.58 cfs @ 12.36 hrs HW=907.93' (Free Discharge) t1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 1.58 cfs @ 0.83 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.16 cfs @ 12.36 hrs HW=907.93' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.16 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydrOCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 18 5 ' 4 ' M Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Hydrograph ■ Inflow ❑ Outflow Inflow Area=2.326 ac :Sewndary Peak Elev=907.93' Storage=6,729 cf 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Time (hours( 220 240 260 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Summary for Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 Inflow Area = 1.146 ac, 50.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.90" for 2-yr event Inflow = 3.49 cis @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.181 of Outflow = 0.15 cfs @ 13.35 hrs, Volume= 0.181 af, Atten= 96%, Lag= 79.3 min Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Secondary = 0.15 cfs @ 13.35 hrs, Volume= 0.181 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 918.19' @ 13.35 hrs Surf.Area= 6,334 sf Storage= 3,873 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 239.7 min ( 1,022.0 - 782.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.50' 16,492 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.50 4,651 0 0 918.00 6,042 2,673 2,673 919.00 7,547 6,795 9,468 919.90 8,062 7,024 16,492 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 919.70' 10.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir X 0.00 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Secondary 917.50' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #3 Primary 915.00' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 543.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 915.00' / 895.00' S= 0.0368 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.35 sf #4 Device 3 918.90' 18.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=917.50' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Culvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 2.47 cfs potential flow) =Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.15 cfs @ 13.35 hrs HW=918.19' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.15 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS12-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/1512017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 02016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 ■ Inflow 0.ae ar ■ ouMow Inflow Area=1.146 ac 0Secondary Peak Elev=918.19' 3 Storage=3,873 cf V 2 J LL i 0.15c% 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrSI 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Summary for Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 Inflow Area = 0.918 ac, 40.87% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.76" for 2-yr event Inflow = 2.60 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.135 of Outflow = 0.10 cfs @ 13.49 hrs, Volume= 0.135 af, Atten= 96%, Lag= 87.6 min Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Secondary = 0.10 cfs @ 13.49 hrs, Volume= 0.135 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 911.71' @ 13.49 hrs Surf.Area= 4,496 sf Storage= 2,901 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 257.1 min ( 1,046.6 - 789.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 911.00, 16,460 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 911.00 3,714 0 0 912.00 4,820 4,267 4,267 913.00 5,965 5,393 9,660 914.00 7,636 6,801 16,460 Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 911.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 913.50' 7.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=911.00' (Free Discharge) L2=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.10 cfs @ 13.49 hrs HW=911.71' TW=907.84' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.10 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills24-hrS12-yr Rainfall=2.87rr Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Pond GP: Filtration Basin #3 Hydrograph Inflow ❑ Outflow ❑ Primary 0 Secondary Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HvdroCAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Summary for Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 Inflow Area = 3.523 ac, 55.87% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.98" for 2-yr event Inflow = 11.16 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.582 of Outflow = 0.96 cfs @ 12.63 hrs, Volume= 0.582 af, Atten= 91%, Lag= 36.0 min Primary = 0.96 cfs @ 12.63 hrs, Volume= 0.582 of Secondary= 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 906.76' @ 12.63 hrs Surf.Area= 6,448 sf Storage= 14,258 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 817.2 min ( 1,595.6 - 778.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 904.00' 27,049 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 904.00 3,974 0 0 905.00 4,811 4,393 4,393 906.00 5,715 5,263 9,656 907.00 6,684 6,200 15,855 908.00 7,718 7,201 23,056 908.50 8,254 3,993 27,049 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 895.25' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 50.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 895.25' / 895.00' S= 0.0050'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 906.65' 27.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 904.00' 1.000 inlhr Exfiltration over Surface area #4 Secondary 908.50' 50.0' long x 1.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31 3.30 3.31 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=0.95 cfs @ 12.63 hrs HW=906.76' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Passes 0.95 cfs of 11.80 cfs potential flow) t2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.81 cfs @ 1.07 fps) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.15 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=904.00' (Free Discharge) t4=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydrOCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 24 Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 ® Inflow iis pis ❑ Ou@lcw ❑ Primary Inflow Area=3.523 ac 0Secondary ,2 „ Peak Elev=906.76' Storage=14,258 cf 20 40 60 6o 100 120 140 160 160 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 25 Time span=0.01-260.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 26000 points x 4 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 1: Runoff Area=0.508 ac 0.82% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.27" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=2.05 cfs 0.096 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 2: Runoff Area=3.523 ac 55.87% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.25" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=18.81 cfs 0.953 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 3: Runoff Area=1.146ac 50.20%Impervious Runoff Depth=3.15" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=5.96 cfs 0.300 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 4: Runoff Area=0.918 ac 40.87% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.98" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=4.57 cfs 0.228 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 5: Runoff Area=0.423ac 59.64%Impervious Runoff Depth=3.31" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=2.29 cfs 0.117 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 6: Runoff Area=1.903 ac 47.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.10" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=9.80 cfs 0,492 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 7: Runoff Area=0.223 ac 23.55% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.67" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=1.02 cfs 0.050 of Pond 1 P: Filtration Basin #4 Peak Elev=912.76' Storage=528 cf Inflow=2.29 cfs 0.117 of Outflow=2.19 cfs 0.117 of Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Peak EIev=908.15' Storage=8,336 cf Inflow=12.03 cfs 0.837 of Primary=7.55 cfs 0.375 of Secondary=0.17 cfs 0.462 of Outflow=7.73 cfs 0.837 of Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 Peak EIev=918.73' Storage=7,484 cf Inflow=5.96 cfs 0.300 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Secondary=0.17 cfs 0.300 of Outflow=0.17 cfs 0.300 of Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 Peak EIev=912.30' Storage=5,759 cf Inflow=4.57 cfs 0.228 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Secondary=0.12 cfs 0.228 of Outflow=0.12 cfs 0.228 of Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 Peak EIev=907.14' Storage=16,786 cf Inflow=18.81 cfs 0.953 of Primary=8.03 cfs 0.953 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=8.03 cfs 0.953 of Total Runoff Area = 8.644 ac Runoff Volume = 2.236 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.10" 52.14% Pervious = 4.507 ac 47.86% Impervious = 4.137 ac 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 1: PROPOSED AREA 1 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 2.05 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af, Depth= 2.27" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionH ills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Area (ac) CN Description 0.504 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.004 98 Roofs. HSG D 0.508 80 Weighted Average 0.504 80 99.18% Pervious Area 0.004 98 0.82% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 1: PROPOSED AREA 1 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 2: PROPOSED AREA 2 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 18.81 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.953 af, Depth= 3.25" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chanhassen Mission Hills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Area (ac) CN Description 1.555 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1.968 98 Roofs, HSG D 3.523 90 Weighted Average 1.555 80 44.13% Pervious Area 1.968 98 55.87% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 2: PROPOSED AREA 2 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 3: PROPOSED AREA 3 (731 Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 5.96 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.300 af, Depth= 3.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Area (ac) CN Description 0.571 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.575 98 Roofs HSG D 1.146 89 Weighted Average 0.571 80 49.80% Pervious Area 0.575 98 50.20% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _(min) (feet) (f /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 3: PROPOSED AREA 3 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCADS 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 29 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 4: PROPOSED AREA 4 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 4.57 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.228 af, Depth= 2.98" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chanhassen Mission Hills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 0.543 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.375 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.918 87 Weighted Average 0.543 80 59.13% Pervious Area 0.375 98 40.87% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 4: PROPOSED AREA 4 Hydrograph ❑ Runaff Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 30 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 5: PROPOSED AREA 5 [731 Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 2.29 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.117 af, Depth= 3.31" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMission Hills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Area (ac) CN Description 0.171 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.252 98 Roofs. HSG D 0.423 91 Weighted Average 0.171 80 40.36% Pervious Area 0.252 98 59.64% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 5: PROPOSED AREA 5 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 31 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 6: PROPOSED AREA 6 [731 Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 9.80 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.492 af, Depth= 3.10" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Area (ac) CN Description 0.994 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.910 98 Roofs, HSG D 1.903 89 Weighted Average 0.994 80 52.20% Pervious Area 0.910 98 47.80% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 6: PROPOSED AREA 6 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 32 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 7: PROPOSED AREA 7 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 1.02 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.050 af, Depth= 2.67" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chan hassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 0.171 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.053 98 Roofs HSG D 0.223 84 Weighted Average 0.171 80 76.45% Pervious Area 0.053 98 23.55% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 7: PROPOSED AREA 7 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 33 Summary for Pond 1P: Filtration Basin #4 Inflow Area = 0.423 ac, 59.64% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.31" for 10-yr event Inflow = 2.29 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.117 of Outflow = 2.19 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.117 af, Atten= 4%, Lag= 1.0 min Primary = 2.19 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.117 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs/4 Peak Elev= 912.76' @ 12.04 hrs Surf.Area= 869 sf Storage= 528 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 65.5 min ( 833.2 - 767.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 912.00' 2,887 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 912.00 520 0 0 913.00 979 750 750 914.00 1,580 1,280 2,029 914.50 1,851 858 2,887 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 907.25' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 82.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 907.25' / 906.92' S= 0.0040'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 912.50' 19.1" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 912.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=2.19 cfs @ 12.04 hrs HW=912.76' TW=908.08' (Dynamic Tailwater) LT=cuivert (Passes 2.19 cfs of 6.76 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 2.17 cfs @ 1.67 fps) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills24-hrS110-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 34 Pond 1P: Filtration Basin #4 Hydrograph ■ Inflow ❑ Primary Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 HVdroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 35 Summary for Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Inflow Area = 2.326 ac, 49.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.32" for 10-yr event Inflow = 12.03 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.837 of Outflow = 7.73 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.837 af, Atten= 36%, Lag= 4.0 min Primary = 7.55 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.375 of Secondary = 0.17 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.462 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 908.15' @ 12.10 hrs Surf.Area= 7,441 sf Storage= 8,336 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 238.6 min ( 1,152.1 - 913.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 906.85' 11,055 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 906.85 4,962 0 0 907.00 5,699 800 800 908.00 7,212 6,456 7,255 908.50 7,989 3,800 11,055 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 907.80' 15.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Secondary 906.85' 1.000 inlhr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=7.54 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=908.15' (Free Discharge) t1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 7.54 cfs @ 1.45 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.17 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=908.15' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.17 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydrOCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydrOCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 36 Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Hydrograph ■ Inflow 0 Outflow na Inflow Area=2.326 ac 0Sond eary ,2 Peak Elev=908.15' " Storage=8,336 cf 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Time (imum) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 HVdroCAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 37 Summary for Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 Inflow Area = 1.146 ac, 50.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.15" for 10-yr event Inflow = 5.96 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.300 of Outflow = 0.17 cfs @ 13.99 hrs, Volume= 0.300 af, Atten= 97%, Lag= 117.9 min Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Secondary = 0.17 cfs @ 13.99 hrs, Volume= 0.300 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 14 Peak Elev= 918.73' @ 13.99 hrs Surf.Area= 7,140 sf Storage= 7,484 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 436.8 min ( 1,210.3 - 773.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.50' 16,492 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.50 4,651 0 0 918.00 6,042 2,673 2,673 919.00 7,547 6,795 9,468 919.90 8,062 7,024 16,492 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 919.70' 10.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir X 0.00 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Secondary 917.50' 1.000 inlhr Exfiltration over Surface area #3 Primary 915.00' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 543.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 915.00' / 895.00' S= 0.0368 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.35 sf #4 Device 3 918.90' 18.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=917.50' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Culvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 2.47 cfs potential flow) =Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.17 cfs @ 13.99 hrs HW=918.73' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.17 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 38 Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 Hydrograph S 3 LL ■ Inflow 5.96 ns - ❑ Ou flow 0 Prima Inflow Area=1.146 ac 0Se ondary Peak Elev=918.73' Storage=7,484 cf 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 39 Summary for Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 Inflow Area = 0.918 ac, 40.87% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.98" for 10-yr event Inflow = 4.57 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.228 of Outflow = 0.12 cfs @ 14.22 hrs, Volume= 0.228 af, Atten= 97%, Lag= 131.5 min Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Secondary = 0.12 cfs @ 14.22 hrs, Volume= 0.228 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 912.30' @ 14.22 hrs Surf.Area= 5,162 sf Storage= 5,759 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 473.5 min ( 1,253.4 - 779.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 911.00, 16,460 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 911.00 3,714 0 0 912.00 4,820 4,267 4,267 913.00 5,965 5,393 9,660 914.00 7,636 6,801 16,460 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 911.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 913.50' 7.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=911.00' (Free Discharge) L2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.12 cfs @ 14.22 hrs HW=912.30' TW=907.84' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.12 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here] Printed 3/15/2017 Hydro CAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 40 Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 Hydrograph ■ Inflow ❑ Outflow ❑ Pnmary ❑ Secondary Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 41 Summary for Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 Inflow Area = 3.523 ac, 55.87% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.25" for 10-yr event Inflow = 18.81 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.953 of Outflow = 8.03 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.953 af, Atten= 57%, Lag= 7.9 min Primary = 8.03 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.953 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 907.14' @ 12.16 hrs Surf.Area= 6,827 sf Storage= 16,786 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 538.8 min ( 1,308.7 - 769.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 904.00' 27,049 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismaticpsted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store _ (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 904.00 3,974 0 0 905.00 4,811 4,393 4,393 906.00 5,715 5,263 9,656 907.00 6,684 6,200 15,855 908.00 7,718 7,201 23,056 908.50 8,254 3,993 27,049 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 895.25' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 50.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 895.25' / 895.00' S= 0.00507 Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 906.65' 27.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 904.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #4 Secondary 908.50' 50.0' long x 1.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31 3.30 3.31 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=8.03 cfs @ 12.16 hrs HW=907.14' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Passes 8.03 cfs of 12.01 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 7.87 cfs @ 2.28 fps) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.16 cfs) econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=904.00' (Free Discharge) =Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 42 Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 21 Inflow Area=3.523 ac 19 Peak Elev=907.14' I Storage=16,786 cf 1 - - - -— _ 14 _- - -- - - - ----.-----.------ _ 13 - - -- _"__.._`-------------- - 12--------------------------.-------------------- ---. --'ama - ------- - - - --. .._-._--.._-------- 6 6 5 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Time (hours) ■ Inflow ❑ outflow ❑ Primary Secondary 15139 Proposed 201 100-yearsnowmeltchanhassen 100-yearsnowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 43 Time span=0.01-260.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 26000 points x 4 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/[mperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 1: Runoff Area=0.508 ac 0.82% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 Runoff=0.24 cfs 0.295 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 2: Runoff Area=3.523ac 55.87%Impervious Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 Runoff=1.69 cfs 2.044 of SubcatchmentPROPOSEDAREA3: Runoff Area=1.146 ac 50.20% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 Runoff=0.55 cfs 0.665 of SubcatchmentPROPOSEDAREA4: Runoff Area=0.918 ac 40.87% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 Runoff=0.44 cfs 0.532 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 5: Runoff Area=0.423 ac 59.64% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 Runoff=0.20 cfs 0.245 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 6: Runoff Area=1.903 ac 47.80% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 Runoff=0.91 cfs 1.104 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 7: Runoff Area=0.223 ac 23.55% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 Runoff=0.11 cfs 0.129 of Pond 1 P: Filtration Basin #4 Peak EIev=912.55' Storage=356 cf Inflow=0.20 cfs 0.245 of Outflow=0.20 cfs 0.245 of Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Peak EIev=907.89' Storage=6,505 cf Inflow=1.21 cfs 1.882 of Primary=1.02 cfs 0.322 of Secondary=0.16 cfs 1.559 of Outflow=1.19 cfs 1.882 of Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 Peak EIev=918.21' Storage=3,953 cf Inflow=0.55 cfs 0.665 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Secondary=0.15 cfs 0.665 of Outflow=0.15 cfs 0.665 of Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 Peak EIev=911.81' Storage=3,351 cf Inflow=0.44 cfs 0.532 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Secondary=0.11 cfs 0.532 of Outflow=0.11 cfs 0.532 of Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 Peak EIev=906.80' Storage=14,549 cf Inflow=1.69 cfs 2.044 of Primary=1.52 cfs 2.044 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=1.52 cfs 2.044 of Total Runoff Area = 8.644 ac Runoff Volume = 5.014 of Average Runoff Depth = 6.96" 52.14% Pervious = 4.507 ac 47.86% Impervious = 4.137 ac 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt Chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/1512017 HydroCAD810.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 44 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 1: PROPOSED AREA 1 Runoff = 0.24 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 0.295 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (ac) CN Adi Description 0.504 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.004 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.508 80 98 Weighted Average, AMC Adjusted 0.504 80 98 99.18% Pervious Area, AMC Adjusted 0.004 98 98 0.82% Impervious Area, AMC Adjusted Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, 0.18 0.16 w a.1 a 3 LL 0.12 11 0.1 Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 1: PROPOSED AREA 1 20 40 60 80 100 Hydrogmph 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Runoff Area=0.508 ac Runoff Volume=0.295 of Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HVdroCAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 45 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 2: PROPOSED AREA 2 Runoff = 1.69 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 2.044 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 his, dt= 0.01 hrs 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (ac) CN Adl Description 1.555 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1.968 98 Roofs HSG D 3.523 90 98 Weighted Average, AMC Adjusted 1.555 80 98 44.13% Pervious Area, AMC Adjusted 1.968 98 98 55.87% Impervious Area, AMC Adjusted Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 2: PROPOSED AREA 2 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Runoff Area=3.523 ac Runoff Volume=2.044 of Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HVdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 46 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 3: PROPOSED AREA 3 Runoff = 0.55 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 0.665 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (ac) CN Adi Description 0.571 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.575 98 Roofs, HSG D 1.146 89 98 Weighted Average, AMC Adjusted 0.571 80 98 49.80% Pervious Area, AMC Adjusted 0.575 98 98 50.20% Impervious Area, AMC Adjusted Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, 0.1 Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 3: PROPOSED AREA 3 Hydrograph 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Runoff Area=1.146 ac Runoff Volume=0.665 of Runoff Depth=6.96" Tc=5.0 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt Chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by (enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 47 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 4: PROPOSED AREA 4 Runoff = 0.44 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 0.532 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (ac) CN Adi Description 0.543 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.375 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.918 87 98 Weighted Average, AMC Adjusted 0.543 80 98 59.13% Pervious Area, AMC Adjusted 0.375 98 98 40.87% Impervious Area, AMC Adjusted Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 4: PROPOSED AREA 4 Hydrograph ❑ RunoR 0.44 100-year snowmelt chanhassen °0 4 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" 0.38 AMC=4 0.36 - 0.34 Runoff Area=0.918 ac 0.32 Runoff Volume=0.532 of 0.3 Runoff Depth=6.96" 0.28 0.26 Tc=5.0 min 0 024 AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 a 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 - - - nna 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 48 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 5: PROPOSED AREA 5 Runoff = 0.20 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 0.245 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (ac) CN Adi Description 0.171 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.252 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.423 91 98 Weighted Average, AMC Adjusted 0.171 80 98 40.36% Pervious Area, AMC Adjusted 0.252 98 98 59.64% Impervious Area, AMC Adjusted Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 5: PROPOSED AREA 5 Hydrograph 0.22 0.2 ozo n z 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 0.19 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" 0.18 AMC=4 0.17 0.16 Runoff Area=0.423 ac 0.15 Runoff Volume=0.245 of 0.14 Runoff Depth=6.96" 0.1s 0.12 Tc=5.0 min 0.11 AMC Adjusted CN=98198 LL 0.1 60 100 120 140 1 Time (hours) ❑ Runaff 15139 Proposed 201 100-yearsnowmelt chanhassen 100-yearsnowmeltRainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 6: PROPOSED AREA 6 Runoff = 0.91 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 1.104 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (ac) CN Ad l Description 0.994 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.910 98 Roofs HSG D 1.903 89 98 Weighted Average, AMC Adjusted 0.994 80 98 52.20% Pervious Area, AMC Adjusted 0.910 98 98 47.80% Impervious Area, AMC Adjusted Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ff/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 6: PROPOSED AREA 6 ❑ Runoff 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Runoff Area=1.903 ac Runoff Volume=1.104 of F Runoff Depth=6.96" U Tc=5.0 min LL AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 80 too 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD( 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 50 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 7: PROPOSED AREA 7 Runoff = 0.11 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 0.129 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 _ Area (ac) CN Adl Description 0.171 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.053 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.223 84 98 Weighted Average, AMC Adjusted 0.171 80 98 76.45% Pervious Area, AMC Adjusted 0.053 98 98 23.55% Impervious Area, AMC Adjusted Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 7: PROPOSED AREA 7 Hydrograph 0.115 0.11 o.n � 0.105 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 0.1 - - 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" 0.095 AMC=4 0.09 0.085 Runoff Area=0.223 ac 0.08 Runoff Volume=0.129 of 0.075 0.07 Runoff Depth=6.96" �o.oss Tc=5.0 min 3 ° 06 AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 0.055 LL n n� 0.015 1 / - `�G! 20 40 60 60 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 51 Summary for Pond 1P: Filtration Basin #4 [871 Warning: Oscillations may require smaller dt or Finer Routing (severity=137) Inflow Area = 0.423 ac, 59.64% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.96" for 100-year snowmelt event Inflow = 0.20 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 0.245 of Outflow = 0.20 cfs @ 120.11 hrs, Volume= 0.245 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 2.2 min Primary = 0.20 cfs @ 120.11 hrs, Volume= 0.245 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 912.55' @ 120.11 hrs Surf.Area= 773 sf Storage= 356 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 80.5 min ( 7,506.8 - 7,426.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 912.00' 2,887 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 912.00 520 0 0 913.00 979 750 750 914.00 1,580 1,280 2,029 914.50 1,851 858 2,887 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 907.25' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 82.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 907.25' / 906.92' S= 0.0040'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 912.50' 19.1" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 912.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=0.20 cfs @ 120.11 hrs HW=912.55' TW=907.89' (Dynamic Tailwater) t1=Culvert (Passes 0.20 cfs of 6.72 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.18 cfs @ 0.73 fps) L 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) 15139 Proposed 201100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 52 Pond 1P: Filtration Basin #4 Hydrograph ■ Inflow ❑ Primary Inflow Area=0.423 ac Peak Elev=912.55' Storage=356 cf - -T -T T : 7 -1 T T i r i _ 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 26C Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 53 Summary for Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Inflow Area = 2.326 ac, 49.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 9.71" for 100-year snowmelt event Inflow = 1.21 cfs @ 120.08 hrs, Volume= 1.882 of Outflow = 1.19 cfs @ 120.19 hrs, Volume= 1.882 af, Atten= 2%, Lag= 6.6 min Primary = 1.02 cfs @ 120.19 hrs, Volume= 0.322 of Secondary= 0.16 cfs @ 120.19 hrs, Volume= 1.559 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 907.89' @ 120.19 hrs Surf.Area= 7,053 sf Storage= 6,505 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 178.5 min ( 7,650.4 - 7,471.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description _ #1 906.85' 11,055 cf Custom Stage Data (PrismaticVisted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 906.85 4,962 0 0 907.00 5,699 800 800 908.00 7,212 6,456 7,255 908.50 7,989 3,800 11,055 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 907.80' 15.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Secondary 906.85' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=1.02 cfs @ 120.19 hrs HW=907.89' (Free Discharge) t1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 1.02 cfs @ 0.72 fps) Secondary OutFlow, Max=0.16 cfs @ 120.19 hrs HW=907.89' (Free Discharge) L2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.16 cfs) 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 54 Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Hydrograph ■ Inflow ❑ Outflow Inflow Area=2.326 ac EISe ondary Peak Elev=907.89' Storage=6,505 cf 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 55 Summary for Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 [87] Warning: Oscillations may require smaller dt or Finer Routing (severity=4997) Inflow Area = 1.146 ac, 50.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.96" for 100-year snowmelt event Inflow = 0.55 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 0.665 of Outflow = 0.15 cfs @ 123.45 hrs, Volume= 0.665 af, Atten= 73%, Lag= 202.6 min Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Secondary = 0.15 cfs @ 123.45 hrs, Volume= 0.665 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 918.21' @ 123.45 hrs Surf.Area= 6,353 sf Storage= 3,953 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 102.2 min ( 7,528.5 - 7,426.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.50' 16,492 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store _ (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.50 4,651 0 0 918.00 6,042 2,673 2,673 919.00 7,547 6,795 9,468 919.90 8,062 7,024 16,492 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 919.70' 10.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir X 0.00 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Secondary 917.50' 1.000 inlhr Exfiltration over Surface area #3 Primary 915.00' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 543.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 915.00' / 895.00' S= 0.0368'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.35 sf #4 Device 3 918.90' 18.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow, Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=917.50' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) t tCulvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 2.47 cfs potential flow) 4=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.15 cfs @ 123.45 hrs HW=918.21' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.15 cfs) 15139 Proposed 201100-yearsnowmeltchanhassen 100-yearsnowmeltRainfa11=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydrOCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 56 Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 Hydrograph ® Inflow a ss crs ❑ Outflow Inflow Area=1.146 ac ❑Second 0.6 ary 0.55 - Peak Elev=918.21' 0.5 - Storage=3,953 cf 4 0.35 0.3 u 0.3 0 u_ 0.25 o.is es 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 201100-yearsnowmeltchanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall= 7.20 ",AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 02016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 57 Summary for Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 [87] Warning: Oscillations may require smaller dt or Finer Routing (severity=4862) Inflow Area = 0.918 ac, 40.87% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.96" for 100-year snowmelt event Inflow = 0.44 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 0.532 of Outflow = 0.11 cfs @ 123.92 hrs, Volume= 0.532 af, Atten= 76%, Lag= 230.6 min Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Secondary = 0.11 cfs @ 123.92 hrs, Volume= 0.532 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 911.81' @ 123.92 hrs Surf.Area= 4,605 sf Storage= 3,351 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time=124.0 min ( 7,550.3 - 7,426.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 911.00, 16,460 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)-isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 911.00 3,714 0 0 912.00 4,820 4,267 4,267 913.00 5,965 5,393 9,660 914.00 7,636 6,801 16,460 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 911.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 913.50' 7.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=911.00' (Free Discharge) L2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Londary OutFlow Max=0.11 cfs @ 123.92 hrs HW=911.81' TW=907.83' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.11 cfs) 15139 Proposed 201100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 02016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 58 Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 Hydrograph - ----- C 0.4 o.a -------- - --- - -. 0.35 0.3 0.25 0 ____ ____ a.1 0.15 __________�____ _ mice 0.1 ■ Inflow ❑ Outflow Inflow Area=0.918 ac o Sep dary Peak Elev=911.81' Storage=3,351 cf 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 Summary for Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 Inflow Area = 3.523 ac, 55.87% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.96" for 100-year snowmelt event Inflow = 1.69 cfs @ 120.07 hrs, Volume= 2.044 of Outflow = 1.52 cfs @ 120.47 hrs, Volume= 2.044 af, Atten= 10%, Lag= 23.6 min Primary = 1.52 cfs @ 120.47 hrs, Volume= 2.044 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 906.80' @ 120.47 hrs Surf.Area= 6,492 sf Storage= 14,549 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 585.7 min ( 8,012.0 - 7,426.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 904.00' 27,049 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store _ (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 904.00 3,974 0 0 905.00 4,811 4,393 4,393 906.00 5,715 5,263 9,656 907.00 6,684 6,200 15,855 908.00 7,718 7,201 23,056 908.50 8,254 3,993 27,049 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 895.25' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 50.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 895.25' / 895.00' S= 0.0050 7 Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 906.65' 27.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 904.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #4 Secondary 908.50' 50.0' long x 1.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31 3.30 3.31 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=1.52 cfs @ 120.47 hrs HW=906.80' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Passes 1.52 cfs of 11.82 cfs potential flow) �2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 1.37 cfs @ 1.27 fps) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.15 cfs) econdary OutFlow Max--0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=904.00' (Free Discharge) Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 15139 Proposed 201 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by tenter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 C 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 60 Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 Hydrograph ■ Inflow ❑ Outflow ❑ Primary ® Secondary 20 40 60 80 IN 120 140 160 160 20J 22C 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 61 Time span=0.01-260.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 26000 points x 4 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 1: Runoff Area=0.508 ac 0.82% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.06" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=4.25 cfs 0.214 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 2: Runoff Area=3.523ac 55.87%Impervious Runoff Depth=6.22" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=33.53 cfs 1.825 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 3: Runoff Area=1.146 ac 50.20% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.10" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=10.77 cfs 0.582 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 4: Runoff Area=0.918 ac 40.87% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.90" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=8.45 cfs 0.452 ai SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 5: Runoff Area=0.423 ac 59.64% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.30" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=4.06 cfs 0.222 ai SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 6: Runoff Area=1.903ac 47.80%Impervious Runoff Depth=6.05" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=17.79 cfs 0.959 of SubcatchmentPROPOSED AREA 7: Runoff Area=0.223 ac 23.55% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.54" Tc=5.0 min CN=80/98 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.103 of Pond 1 P: Filtration Basin #4 Peak EIev=912.88' Storage=640 cf Inflow=4.06 cfs 0.222 of Outflow=3.92 cfs 0.222 of Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Peak EIev=908.40' Storage=10,236 cf Inflow=21.75 cfs 1.632 of Primary=18.63 cfs 0.973 of Secondary=0.18 cfs 0.660 of Outflow=18.81 cfs 1.632 of Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 Peak EIev=919.21' Storage=11,070 cf Inflow=10.77 cfs 0.582 of Primary=2.67 cfs 0.183 of Secondary=0.18 cfs 0.399 of Outflow=2.85 cfs 0.582 of Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 Peak EIev=913.50' Storage=12,854 cf Inflow=8.45 cfs 0.452 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Secondary=0.16 cfs 0.452 of Outflow=0.16 cfs 0.452 of Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 Peak EIev=908.46' Storage=26,731 cf Inflow=33.53 cfs 1.825 of Primary=12.70 cfs 1.825 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=12.70 cfs 1.825 of Total Runoff Area = 8.644 ac Runoff Volume = 4.357 of Average Runoff Depth = 6.05" 52.14% Pervious = 4.507 ac 47.86% Impervious = 4.137 ac 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 62 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 1: PROPOSED AREA 1 [731 Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 4.25 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af, Depth= 5.06" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 0.504 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.004 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.508 80 Weighted Average 0.504 80 99.18% Pervious Area 0.004 98 0.82% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, N U Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 1: PROPOSED AREA 1 Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ RunoN 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 63 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 2: PROPOSED AREA 2 [731 Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 33.53 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 1.825 af, Depth= 6.22" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 1.555 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1.968 98 Roofs. HSG D 3.523 90 Weighted Average 1.555 80 44.13% Pervious Area 1.968 98 55.87% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 2: PROPOSED AREA 2 Hydrograph ❑ RunoH Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 64 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 3: PROPOSED AREA 3 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 10.77 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.582 af, Depth= 6.10" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 0.571 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.575 98 Roofs, HSG D 1.146 89 Weighted Average 0.571 80 49.80% Pervious Area 0.575 98 50.20% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 3: PROPOSED AREA 3 Hydrograph ❑ Runaff Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 65 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 4: PROPOSED AREA 4 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 8.45 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.452 af, Depth= 5.90" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chan hassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 0.543 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.375 98 Roofs. HSG D 0.918 87 Weighted Average 0.543 80 59.13% Pervious Area 0.375 98 40.87% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 4: PROPOSED AREA 4 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HVdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 66 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 5: PROPOSED AREA 5 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 4.06 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.222 af, Depth= 6.30" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chan hassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 0.171 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.252 98 Roofs HSG D 0.423 91 Weighted Average 0.171 80 40.36% Pervious Area 0.252 98 59.64% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 5: PROPOSED AREA 5 Hydrograph ❑ RunoB Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydrOCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 67 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 6: PROPOSED AREA 6 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 17.79 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.959 af, Depth= 6.05" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 0.994 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D _ 0.910 98 Roofs, HSG D 1.903 89 Weighted Average 0.994 80 52.20% Pervious Area 0.910 98 47.80% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 6: PROPOSED AREA 6 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 Hydro CAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 02016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 68 Summary for Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 7: PROPOSED AREA 7 [73] Warning: Peak may fall outside time span Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.103 af, Depth= 5.54" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chanhassen Mission Hills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 0.171 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 0.053 98 Roofs, HSG D 0.223 84 Weighted Average 0.171 80 76.45% Pervious Area 0.053 98 23.55% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PROPOSED AREA 7: PROPOSED AREA 7 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD@ 10.00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 69 Summary for Pond 1P: Filtration Basin #4 Inflow Area = 0.423 ac, 59.64% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.30" for 100-yr event Inflow = 4.06 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.222 of Outflow = 3.92 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.222 af, Atten= 3%, Lag= 0.9 min Primary = 3.92 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.222 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 912.88' @ 12.04 hrs Surf.Area= 926 sf Storage= 640 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 42.1 min ( 801.4 - 759.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 912.00' 2,887 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 912.00 520 0 0 913.00 979 750 750 914.00 1,580 1,280 2,029 914.50 1,851 858 2,887 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 907.25' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 82.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 907.25' / 906.92' S= 0.0040 7 Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 912.50' 19.1" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 912.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max--3.92 cfs @ 12.04 hrs HW=912.88' TW=908.38' (Dynamic Tailwater) trculvert (Passes 3.92 cfs of 6.63 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 3.90 cfs @ 2.03 fps) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 70 Pond 1P: Filtration Basin #4 Hydrograph FEI—in—fi.---k ❑ Primary 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010.00-19 s/n 01655 C 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 71 Summary for Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Inflow Area = 2.326 ac, 49.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 8.42" for 100-yr event Inflow = 21.75 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 1.632 of Outflow = 18.81 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 1.632 af, Atten= 14%, Lag= 2.0 min Primary = 18.63 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.973 of Secondary = 0.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.660 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 908.40' @ 12.06 hrs Surf.Area= 7,828 sf Storage= 10,236 cf Plug -Flow detention time=182.6 min calculated for 1.632 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 182.7 min ( 1,190.6 - 1,008.0 ) _Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 906.85' 11,055 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 906.85 4,962 0 0 907.00 5,699 800 800 908.00 7,212 6,456 7,255 908.50 7,989 3,800 11,055 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 907.80' 15.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Secondary 906.85' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=18.60 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=908.40' (Free Discharge) t1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 18.60 cfs @ 2.08 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=908.40' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.18 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hrSI 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydrOCADS 10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 72 Pond 2P: Filtration Basin #5 Hydrograph ■ Inflow 21.75 ❑ Outflow 0 Prima Inflow Area=2.326 ac M se ondary Peak Elev=908.40' Storage=10,236 cf 40 60 Bo 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by (enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 @ 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 73 Summary for Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 Inflow Area = 1.146 ac, 50.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.10" for 100-yr event Inflow = 10.77 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.582 of Outflow = 2.85 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 0.582 af, Atten= 74%, Lag= 17.5 min Primary = 2.67 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 0.183 of Secondary = 0.18 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 0.399 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 919.21' @ 12.32 hrs Surf.Area= 7,668 sf Storage= 11,070 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 360.3 min ( 1,124.9 - 764.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.50' 16,492 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.50 4,651 0 0 918.00 6,042 2,673 2,673 919.00 7,547 6,795 9,468 919.90 8,062 7,024 16,492 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 919.70' 10.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir X 0.00 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #2 Secondary 917.50' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #3 Primary 915.00' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 543.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 915.00' / 895.00' S= 0.0368 ? Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.35 sf #4 Device 3 918.90' 18.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max-2.67 cfs @ 12.32 hrs HW=919.21' (Free Discharge) �1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Culvert (Passes 2.67 cfs of 3.13 cfs potential flow) =Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 2.67 cfs @ 1.82 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.18 cfs @ 12.32 hrs HW=919.21' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.18 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen Mission Hills 24-hrS1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 HydrOCAD910.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 74 Pond 5P: Filtration Basin #2 Hydrograph ■ Inflow ❑ Outflow ,2- Inflow Area=1.146 ac sewdary 11 Peak Elev=919.21' Storage=11,070 cf 60 ,00 120 140 160 ,80 200 220 240 260 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 HVdroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 75 Summary for Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 Inflow Area = 0.918 ac, 40.87% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.90" for 100-yr event Inflow = 8.45 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.452 of Outflow = 0.16 cfs @ 15.45 hrs, Volume= 0.452 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 205.4 min Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 15.45 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Secondary = 0.16 cfs @ 15.45 hrs, Volume= 0.452 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 913.50' @ 15.45 hrs Surf.Area= 6,801 sf Storage= 12,854 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 853.6 min ( 1,623.6 - 770.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 911.00, 16,460 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) -fisted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-fl) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 911.00 3,714 0 0 912.00 4,820 4,267 4,267 913.00 5,965 5,393 9,660 914.00 7,636 6,801 16,460 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 911.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 913.50' 7.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 15.45 hrs HW=913.50' (Free Discharge) t2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 0.00 cfs @ 0.06 fps) SecondaryOutFlow Max=0.16 cfs @ 15.45 hrs HW=913.50' TW=907.85' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.16 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/1512017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 01655 02016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 76 Pond 6P: Filtration Basin #3 ■ inflow nu es ❑outflow Inflow Area=0.918 ac 0Secondary Peak Elev=913.50' Storage=12,854 cf 6 H 5 LL q 3 ____' 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Time (hours) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/15/2017 Summary for Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 Inflow Area = 3.523 ac, 55.87% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.22" for 100-yr event Inflow = 33.53 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 1.825 of Outflow = 12.70 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 1.825 af, Atten= 62%, Lag= 9.6 min Primary = 12.70 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 1.825 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-260.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 4 Peak Elev= 908.46' @ 12.19 hrs Surf.Area= 8,213 sf Storage= 26,731 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 305.9 min ( 1,067.2 - 761.3) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 904.00' 27,049 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store _ (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 904.00 3,974 0 0 905.00 4,811 4,393 4,393 906.00 5,715 5,263 9,656 907.00 6,684 6,200 15,855 908.00 7,718 7,201 23,056 908.50 8,254 3,993 27,049 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 895.25' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 50.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 895.25' / 895.00' S= 0.0050'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 906.65' 27.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 1 904.00' 1.000 in/hr Exfltration over Surface area #4 Secondary 908.50' 50.0' long x 1.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31 3.30 3.31 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=12.70 cfs @ 12.19 hrs HW=908.46' (Free Discharge) 'L Culvert (Barrel Controls 12.70 cfs @ 16.17 fps) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes < 25.76 cfs potential flow) 3=Exfiltration (Passes < 0.19 cfs potential flow) econdary OutFlow Max--0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=904.00' (Free Discharge) =Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 15139 Proposed 2017-03-14 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 3/15/2017 HydroCAD010 00-19 s/n 01655 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 78 Pond 7P: Filtration Basin #1 Hydrograph ■ Inflow ❑ Outflow ❑ Pnmary 0 Secondary Time (hours) EXISTING EXISTING AREA 2 1 EXISTING AREA 3 Subcat Reach on Link 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD®10.00-13 s/n 01655 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 8.644 89 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG D (E1, E2, E3) 8.644 89 TOTAL AREA 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD®10.00-13 s/n 01655 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 8.644 HSG D E1, E2, E3 0.000 Other 8.644 TOTAL AREA 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCADO 10.00-13 s/n 01655 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.644 0.000 8.644 Row crops, straight row, Good E1, E2, E3 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.644 0.000 8.644 TOTAL AREA 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrSI 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD®10.00-13 s/n 01655 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.01-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 Inns, 24000 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentE1: EXISTING AREA 1 Runoff Area=3.404 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.78" Tc=13.7 min CN=89/0 Runoff=7.10 cfs 0.506 of SubcatchmentE2: EXISTINGAREA2 Runoff Area=3.777 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.78" Tc=10.6 min CN=89/0 Runoff=8.84 cfs 0.561 of SubcatchmentE3: EXISTINGAREA3 Runoff Area=1.463 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.78" Tc=12.3 min CN=89/0 Runoff=3.21 cfs 0.217 of Total Runoff Area = 8.644 ac Runoff Volume = 1.284 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.78" 100.00% Pervious = 8.644 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hrSI 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD010.00-13 s/n 01655 @ 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment E1: EXISTING AREA 1 Runoff = 7.10 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.506 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chan hassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Description 3.404 89 Row crops straight row, Good HSG D 3.404 89 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.7 Direct Entry, Subcatchment Ell: EXISTING AREA 1 ❑ Runoff 7 ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr St 2-yr Rainfall=2.87 Runoff Area=3.404 ac 6 Runoff Volume=0.506 of Runoff Depth=1.78" 5 Tc=13.7 min CN=8910 V 3 4 O LL 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours( 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/2012015 HydroCAD®10.00-13 s/n 01655 @ 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 7 Summary for Subcatchment E2: EXISTING AREA 2 Runoff = 8.84 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.561 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chanhassen Mission H ills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Description 3.777 89 Row crops straight row, Good HSG D 3.777 89 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ff) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.6 Direct Entry, Subcatchment E2: EXISTING AREA 2 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD010.00-13 s/n 01655 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment E3: EXISTING AREA 3 Runoff = 3.21 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.217 af, Depth= 1.78" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Description 1.463 89 Row crops straight row, Good HSG D 1.463 89 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 12.3 Direct Entry, Subcatchment E3: EXISTING AREA 3 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD®10.00-13 s/n 01655 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Time span=0.01-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24000 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentE1: EXISTING AREA 1 Runoff Area=3.404 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.07" Tc=13.7 min CN=89/0 Runoff=12.52 cfs 0.870 of SubcatchmentE2: EXISTINGAREA2 Runoff Area=3.777 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.07" Tc=10.6 min CN=89/0 Runoff=15.56 cfs 0.966 of SubcatchmentE3: EXISTINGAREA3 Runoff Area=1.463 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.07" Tc=12.3 min CN=89/0 Runoff=5.66 cfs 0.374 of Total Runoff Area = 8.644 ac Runoff Volume = 2.210 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.07" 100.00% Pervious = 8.644 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 Hydro CAD®10.00-13 s/n 01655 @ 2014 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment E1: EXISTING AREA 1 Runoff = 12.52 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.870 af, Depth= 3.07" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Area (ac) CN Description 3.404 89 Row crops straight row, Good HSG D 3.404 89 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 13.7 Direct Entry, Subcatchment Ell: EXISTING AREA 1 ❑ Runoff ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=3.404 ac Runoff Volume=0.870af Runoff Depth=3.07 Tc=13.7 min CN=8910 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 U-A—nAl. In nn Ao -I- n41cc 1 n I 1 L.J__r nll n_6..-_- n-1. a:___ 1 n n.._- 44 Summary for Subcatchment E2: EXISTING AREA 2 Runoff = 15.56 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.966 af, Depth= 3.07" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" _ Area (ac) CN Description 3.777 89 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG D 3.777 89 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 10.6 Direct Entry, Subcatchment E2: EXISTING AREA 2 Hydrograph 17 16 1s.n ns Chanhassen Mission Hills 24-hr S1 10-yr s01. Rainfall=4.26" 14 Runoff Area=3.777 ac 19 Runoff Volume=0.966-af 12 Runoff Depth=3.07" 11 Tc=10.6 min 10 CN=8910 0 8 LL 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 Time (hours) 190 200 210 220 230 240 ❑ Runoff 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/2012015 HydroCAD@ 10.00-13 s/n 01655 @ 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment E3: EXISTING AREA 3 Runoff = 5.66 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.374 af, Depth= 3.07" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chanhassen Mission Hills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" Area (ac) CN Description 1.463 89 Row crops straight row, Good, HSG D 1.463 89 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 12.3 Direct Entry, Subcatchment E3: EXISTING AREA 3 ❑ Runoff ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 10-yr Rainfall=4.26" 5 Runoff Area=1.463 ac Runoff Volume=0.374 of Runoff Depth=3.07" 4 Tc=12.3 min CN=89/0 0 3 LL 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 15139 Existing 2015 100-yearsnowmelt chanhassen 100-yearsnowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD®10.00-13 s/n 01655 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Time span=0.01-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24000 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentE1:EXISTING AREA I Runoff Area=3.404ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.96" Tc=13.7 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 Runoff=1.61 cfs 1.974 of SubcatchmentE2:EXISTINGAREA2 Runoff Area=3.777ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.96" Tc=10.6 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 Runoff 1.79 cfs 2.190 of SubcatchmentE3: EXISTING AREA Runoff Area=1.463 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.96" Tc=12.3 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 Runoff=0.69 cfs 0.848 of Total Runoff Area = 8.644 ac Runoff Volume = 5.012 of Average Runoff Depth = 6.96" 100.00% Pervious = 8.644 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac 15139 Existing 2015 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD®10.00-13 s/n 01655 @ 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Subcatchment E1: EXISTING AREA 1 Runoff = 1.61 cfs @ 120.21 hrs, Volume= 1.974 af, Depth> 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (ac) CN Adi Description 3.404 89 Row crops straight row, Good HSG D 3.404 89 98 Weighted Average, AMC Adjusted 3.404 89 98 100.00% Pervious Area, AMC Adjusted Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 13.7 Direct Entry, Subcatchment E1: EXISTING AREA 1 ❑ Runoff 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Runoff Area=3.404 ac Runoff Volume=1.974 of Runoff Depth>6.96" 3 Tc=13.7 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 15139 Existing 2015 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 01655 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Subcatchment E2: EXISTING AREA 2 Runoff = 1.79 cfs @ 120.15 hrs, Volume= 2.190 af, Depth> 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (ac) CN Adi Description 3.777 89 Row crops straight row, Good HSG D 3.777 89 98 Weighted Average, AMC Adjusted 3.777 89 98 100.00% Pervious Area, AMC Adjusted Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.6 Direct Entry, Subcatchment E2: EXISTING AREA 2 Hydrograph 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" AMC=4 Runoff Area=3.777 ac Runoff Volume=2.190 of w Runoff Depth>6.96" u 3 1 Tc=10.6 min LL AMC Adjusted CN=98198 110 120 130 140 150 160 1 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff 15139 Existing 2015 100-yearsnowmeltchanhassen 100-yearsnowmeltRainfal1=7.20" AMC=4 Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD010.00-13 s/n 01655 @ 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Summary for Subcatchment E3: EXISTING AREA 3 Runoff = 0.69 cfs @ 120.17 hrs, Volume= 0.848 af, Depth> 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20", AMC=4 Area (ac) CN Ado Description 1.463 89 Row crops straight row, Good HSG D 1.463 89 98 Weighted Average, AMC Adjusted 1.463 89 98 100.00% Pervious Area, AMC Adjusted Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (wsec) (cfs) 12.3 Direct Entry, Subcatchment E3: EXISTING AREA 3 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff "' 100-year snowmelt chanhassen 0.65 100-year snowmelt Rainfall=7.20" 0.6 AMC=4 0.55 Runoff Area=1.463 ac 0.5 Runoff Volume=0.848 of a 0.45 Runoff Depth>6.96" 04 Tc=12.3 min AMC Adjusted CN=98/98 a as LL 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 1 Time (hours) 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 HVdroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 01655 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Time span=0.01-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24000 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentE1: EXISTING AREA 1 Runoff Area=3.404 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.08" Tc=13.7 min CN=89/0 Runoff=23.06 cfs 1.725 of SubcatchmentE2: EXISTING AREA2 Runoff Area=3.777 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.08" Tc=10.6 min CN=89/0 Runoff=28.45 cfs 1.914 of SubcatchmentE3: EXISTINGAREA3 Runoff Area=1.463 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.08" Tc=12.3 min CN=89/0 Runoff=10.38 cfs 0.741 of Total Runoff Area = 8.644 ac Runoff Volume = 4.379 of Average Runoff Depth = 6.08" 100.00% Pervious = 8.644 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrSI 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD010.00-13 s/n 01655 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Summary for Subcatchment E1: EXISTING AREA 1 Runoff = 23.06 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 1.725 af, Depth= 6.08" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 3.404 89 Row crops straight row, Good HSG D 3.404 89 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 13.7 Direct Entry, Subcatchment E1: EXISTING AREA 1 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hrS1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD®10.00-13 s/n 01655 ©2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Summary for Subcatchment E2: EXISTING AREA 2 Runoff = 28.45 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 1.914 af, Depth= 6.08" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs ChanhassenMissionH ills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 3.777 89 Row crops straight row, Good HSG D 3.777 89 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.6 Direct Entry, Subcatchment E2: EXISTING AREA 2 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) 15139 Existing 2015-01-09 Trial ChanhassenMissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/20/2015 HydroCAD® 10.00-13 s/n 01655 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Summary for Subcatchment E3: EXISTING AREA 3 Runoff = 10.38 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.741 af, Depth= 6.08" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Chanhassen MissionHills 24-hr S1 100-yr Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 1.463 89 Row crops straight row, Good HSG D 1.463 89 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 12.3 Direct Entry, Subcatchment E3: EXISTING AREA 3 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff Time (hours) VIPER S Ga" SERIES Job SMALL VIPER LUMINAIRE SPECIFICATIONS Intended Use: The Beacon Viperluminaire is availablewlth awlde choice of different LED Wattage configurations and optical distributions designed to replace HID lighting up to 40OW MH or HPS. Construction: • Manufactured with dlo cast aluminum. • Coated with a polyester finish that meets ASTM B117 corrosion test requirements and ASTM D522 cracking and loss of adhesion test mqulrements. • Edward hardware is corrosion resistant. • One piece optical cartridge system consisting of an LED engine, LED lamps, optics, gasket and stainless steel bezel. • Cartridge is held together with internal brass star Jeffs soldered to the board so that it can be held replaced as a one piece optical system. • Two-piece silicone and micro -cellular polyurethane foarn gasket ensures a weather-proof seal wound each individual LED. Electrical: • 100V through 277V, 50 Hz to 60 Hz (UNV), or 347V or 480V input. • Power factor is >_.90 at fug load. • All electrical components are rated at 50,000 hours at full load and 25"C ambient conditions per MIL- 217F Notice 2. • Dimming drivers are standard, but must contact factory to request wiring leads for Purpose of external dimming controls. • Component -to -component wiring within the luminaire may carry no more than 80% of rated bad and is certified by ILL for use at 600VAC at WC or higher. • Plug disconnects are certified by ILL for use at 600 VAC, 13A or higher. 13A rating applies to primary (AC) side only. • Fature electrical compartment shall contain all LED driver components and shall be provided with a push-button terminal block for AC power connections. • The housing is designed for an optional twist lock photo control receptacle. • Ambient operating temperature -40°C to 40-C • Surge protection - 20KA. • Optional 7-pin ANSI C136.41-2013 twist -lock photo control receptacle available. Compatible with ANSI C136.41 external wireless control devices. • Hashieli Circuit - protects luminaire from excessive temperature. The device shall activate at a specific, factory -preset temperature, and progressively reduce power over a finite temperature cargo. Operation shall be smooth and undetectable to the eye. Thermal circuit is designed to "fail on", allowing the luminaire to revert to full power in the event of an interruption of its power supply, or faulty wiring connection to the drivers. The device shall be able to co -exist with other 0-1 OV control devices (occupancy sensors, external dimmers, etc.). CERTIFICATIONS/LIa STI NGS c Sias S Type Controls/Options; • Available with an optional passive infrared (PIR) motion sensor capable of detecting motion 360" around the luminaire. When no motion is detected for the Specified time, the Motion Response system reduces the wattage to factory preset level, reducing the light level accordingly. When motion is detected by the PIR sensor, the luminaire returns to full wattage and full light output. Please contact Beacon Products If project requirements vary from standard configuration. • Available with Energani for optional set dimming, timed dimming with simple delay, or timed dimming based on time of night (see www beacanomaucis cmm/mroeuck_/erxrcend. • In addition, Viper can be specified with SlteSyni wireless control system for reduction in energy and maintenance cost while oja mi j light quality 2417. See ordering information or visit www.hubbelliiahtina.com/sitesvnc for more details. Installation: • Mounting options for horizontal word, vertical tenon or tradbonal arm mounting available. Mounting hardware included. Finish: • IFS polyester powder coat electro- statically applied and thermccured. • IFS finish consists of a five stage pretreatment regimen with a polymer primar sealer and top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. • The finish meets the AAMA 605.2 pedomiance specification which includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resistance and resists cracking or loss of adhesion per ASTM D522 and resists surface impacts of up to 150 inch -pounds. Listings: • DesignLights Consortium (DLC) qualified, consult DLC website for more details. http:// www.designlights.org/OPL • Listed to UL1598 and CSA22.2M250.0-24 for wet locations and 40-C ambient temperatures • 3G rated for ANSI C136.31 high vibration applications with SF2 mounting • IDA approved warranty. Five year limited warranty for nrom information visit: www1rubbefflijaht no.com/resources/warminty Approvals PRODUCT IMAGE(S) DIMENSIONS A A e C Weight EPA 22.75" 16.75" 11.25" 15.0 Ibs .67 fN (578 mm) (425 mm) (286 mm) (6.8 kg) MOUNTING OPTIONS S1Ca haw Au % sa/e• ao _ 2 W inn SHa Ycew SF223/8'ODS1p Fmer Bac',V. 2 3/8- 0 51/2" 1 s 0g- ® Beacon Products • 2041 58th Avenue Circle East Bradenton, R. 34203 • Phone: 800-345-4928 ® HUBBELL �pa�EAW Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. � Lighting "•v^rio� 02m58FACON PIinDI1CT5, P1mgh6 fleserreE •Far maeiMwmatim Nsit air websi:e. w .Macanproduas.mm • 11hodin IISA VPS-SPEC11/16 ORDERING INFORMATION ORDERING EXAMPLE:VPS/36NB-80/5K/T4/UNV/PCR-TUSWPBLC/RA/BBT I VPS I VPS viper -small 24NB-55 55W, LED any 30NB-70 70W, LED MY 36NB-80 BOW, LED any 48NB-110 11 OW, LED any BONB-136 136W, LED any r I r 3K 3000K UNV 120-277V I 4K 4000K 347V 347V 5K 5DOOK 480V 480V I• Tl type T2 type 11 T3 type 111 T4 type N T5R type V, rectangular T50M type V, square medium T5W type V. round wide FR front now alto optic - --■ ELECTRICAL HOUSE SIDE SHIELD OPTIONS 11 OPTIONS PCR-TL Twist lock MSS-90 house side receptacle shield 90` with photo HSS-180 house side control Shield 180' PCR-SC Twist lock BLCa backlight receptacle control with short- r • r • r ing cap PCRU Twist lock MI moron dimming receptacle detector 2PP dual power feed • I r BSP bird spike or"". " GENI-XX6 Emergent SWP's SOeSync Wireless Pre -Commission SWRMa+ SOeSync Wireless Pre -Commission w/ Motion Detection ' yew treaty 9wm mN=me as m al firedrare. See ewnaeMiaMrg.mNm,xr65aemc blunch6h ' Ti�ryuycamh ce W: a roomy Ie,H me „xerMg �t 'To.gti3lsna Wt90 eatras, yesily t v Raft Ne overran riMWlm w *T41_ r Nmawauew+md ra.,wlamew xi e. 'cane -dal, F e,...l cermy Ine r_wme..I rode mrzmge c1FoalaeMe .. znr.o ' Wlavaoba.mawryly Wl areilaN, fora 'w Ratoi µl MMMMLSSm SIrESYNC ORDERING INFORMATION: When amen a fixture wM Bme ShSync fAAtlng wnbol option, alldNonal annotator will be required to mmplate to order. The Siessync Commissioning Form a W erni schedule information must be oomplated. This form Induces Project bration, Group IMolmadon, and 0per no schedules. For more detailedinformaton please vat www.HubbeIlLiAhtirq.coMproduc@tsawmc or ormad Hubbell LMhtin] tech abroad at (Btu) ns 4928. SNeSyrcaxNres wtth Motimcontrol(SW Krequirethe mounne, height ottix faWre rorsekdion of 1be Jere. ExaMP(es:VP-S24N0 555KTnNWSWPr1WOBT SiI only VP-St24N3-5515I'✓fMWSWPM-20FMNDBT s rsync won Waon Cumboi MOO ORDERING INFORMNTION: When ordenng a future win the motion defection who (MDD), please specify the aDprognate Information. These settings are specified In the adedmg as steam in the example below. VP-5124NB-555x WAy1DO - 1 to W min. - 33%or cc% / N1nJT High ro Dim Delay lmy Level Mau bra NeipM(IL) RA rectangular arm for round or square pole mount RPA induced. SF2 2 3/8. OD slip -fitter Pi 2 3/8" adjustable knuckle WB wall bracket (use with SF2 a PK2), SF2 standard ROT basic black textured BUT black matte textured WHT white textured MBT metallic bronze textured BZT bronze textured BBT dark bronze textured GYS gray smooth BPS dark platinum smooth GNT green textured MST metallic silver textured I MTT metallic titanium textured OM old world iron RAIL Accessories and Services (0fdered Separately) Number DescriptionCatalog SWUSB' SKeSync loaded on USE; flash drive (Windows based only) SWTAB` SnesyncwndowsTablet SWBRG- SKeSync Wireless Bridge Node •When orWng wM SdeSync, am of the folbvnng item w opbp must W cbesen and ordered separately. Each option rommom Me SiteSync Utenee. GUI and Bndge Woo r d needed. an addMonal Bndge Nwle can be ordered. De,agnt-ghts Consortium guadified. ■ Consutt DLC wehsite for more details: httpJ/www.designtigh%or9/0PL DEEFIF ROTATED OPTIC RIGHT ROTATED OPTIC 4te5ujn: )' IFFFF —11 ri SReSync Lighting Control is available from our most popular brands in a broad range of award -winning product families. Beacon Products w 2041 5fith Avenue Circle East Bradenton, FL 34203 • Phone: 800-345-4928 L �Ea HUBBELFEACM flue to our continued efforts to improve our products. product specifications are subject to change without notice. w�1 Lighting ^=•s^ ^^•^•'�^^^w, 02016131DkCONPNODUCTS,Allu"Reaned•FarmereavormaNmvsitourrre6sh:www.bexanpmadbctssem• Pnntedn" SPEC11116 PERFORMANCE DATA a 24 I 700 mA 1 I FR?1 T2 T3 55W T4 T5R T50M T5W .ill I 6339 114 1 0 1 I11 I(3000K 6276 112 1 0 1 nominal, :I 1 0 5389794 1 5666 102 2 0 2 5610 101 2 0 2 48161 0 2 5610 101 1 0 2 5554 100 1 0 2 47841 0 2 6171 111 1 0 2 6110 109 1 0 2 52451 0 2 6283 113 3 0 3 6221 111 3 0 3 53413 0 3 6171 111 3 0 1 6110 109 3 0 1 52452 0 1 6087 109 3 0 1 6027 108 3 0 1 5201 93 3 0 1 30 700 mA 70W FRIT1 8096 113 1 0 1 8016 112 1 0 1 6882 96 1 0 1 T2 7204 101 2 0 2 7133 100 2 0 2 6123 86 2 0 2 T3 7743 108 2 0 2 7666 107 2 0 2 6659 93 2 0 2 T4 7896 111 1 0 2 7817 110 1 0 2 6791 95 1 0 2 T5R 8035 112 3 0 3 7954 111 3 0 3 6829 95 3 0 3 T50M 7846 110 3 0 1 7768 109 3 0 1 6669 93 3 0 1 T5W 8305 116 3 0 2 8222 115 3 0 2 7142 100 3 0 2 36 700 mA BOW FR/T1 9515 114 1 0 1 9414 112 1 0 1 8083 96 1 0 1 T2 8505 101 2 0 3 8415 100 2 0 3 7224 87 2 0 2 T3 8415 100 2 0 2 8331 99 2 0 2 7175 86 2 0 2 T4 9256 110 1 0 3 9164 109 1 0 3 7868 94 1 0 3 T5R 9425 112 3 0 3 9331 111 3 0 3 8011 96 3 0 3 T50M 9257 110 3 0 1 9164 109 3 0 1 7868 94 3 0 1 T5W 9131 109 3 0 2 9040 108 3 0 2 7801 93 1 3 1 0 1 2 48 700 mA 110 W FRrh 12679 114 2 0 1 1 15M 113 2 0 1 1 1 10777 97 1 1 0 1 T2 11332 102 3 0 3 11220 101 3 1 0 1 31 9633 87 2 0 3 T3 11220 101 2 0 3 11108 100 2 1 0 1 31 9567 86 2 0 3 T4 12342 1 111 2 0 3 12219 110 2 0 3 10491 95 2 0 3 T5R 12567 113 4 0 4 12441 112 4 0 4 10682 96 3 0 3 T50M 12342 111 3 0 2 12219 111 3 0 2 10491 95 3 0 2 T5W 12175 110 4 0 2 12053 109 4 0 2 10402 94 4 0 2 60 700 mA 136W FRlT1 15848 116 2 0 1 15690 115 2 0 1 13471 98 2 0 1 T2 14165 103 3 0 3 14025 102 3 0 3 12041 88 3 0 3 T3 14025 102 3 0 3 13895 101 3 0 3 11959 87 3 0 3 T4 15427 113 2 0 3 15274 111 2 0 3 13114 96 2 0 3 T5R 15708 115 4 0 4 15259 111 4 0 4 13352 97 4 0 4 TSOM 15427 113 4 0 2 15274 111 4 0 2 13314 96 3 0 2 T5W 15218 111 4 0 2 15066 111 4 0 2 13002 95 4 0 2 'Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accomance wRh IESNA lM-79i Date is considered to be reDresertlative of me configundons snovm. Actual performance may Offer as a result of end -user environment and applicmon. Beacon Products • 2041 5881 Avenue Circle East Bradenton, FL 34203 • Ptlane: 800-345-4928 ® HU66ELL Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change wi0out notice. Lighting i �e.p., e.,r.•1.4 ,..n.m�v 02016 BFACDN RiDDIICi5. 0A RiAlib neservM.Far mare intwmation vbll our wetsRe: www.EwadOroOucRsoln • Mori SPEC11116X PHOTOMETRICS Type II VP-S-60NB-136-5K-T2 Type III VP-S-60NB-136-5K-T3 Type V Square Medium Type V Rectangular VP-S-60NB-136-5K-T5OM VP-S-60NB-136-5K-T5R ELECTRICAL DATA 3• r 1 24 i r• 2 700 mA i 20 •i 55 a 5 347 0.2 480 0.1 30 2 700 MA 120 70 0.6 347 2 480 0.1 36 1 700 or 120 80 0.7 0.3 347 480 0.2 48 1 700 MA 120 110 0.9 0.4 347 0.3 480 0.2 60 1 700 MA 120 136 1.1 347 0.4 480 0.3 EPA lie �®Config. ®EPA Nib. Type IV VP-S-GONB-136-5K-T4 Type V Round Wide VP-S-61361 PROJECTED LUMEN MAINTENANCE lm Front Row Auto Optic / Type I VP-S-60NB-136-5K-FR VP-S-60NB-136-5K-T1 ' Projected per IESNA TM-21L 11 Data references the ederianaled performance projections for the base model In a QO C ambient, based on 10 000 hours of LED testing per rESNA LM 80-08. 0°C 327 1.02 10°C 501 1.01 20'C 61 1.00 25'C 77'F 1.00 30'C 1 0.98 40'C 104'F 0.98 Use these patrons to determine respire lumen output for average Moral temperatures fmrn o-5 G132-1 XTL DRILL PATTERN Cornpatide with Pde drill p rfom E34 4' Suggested didarcefromtop of Pde 2.50' 05/6" I nectagular'I Prm I—� 04' Pole �t 05• Pde �-} 06' Pole Beacon Products • 2041 58th Avenue Circle East Bradenton, FL 34203 • Phone 800-345-4928 ' HUBBl BE�/��/��N Duetocurcontlnued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subjectto change without notes k= Lighting ,<," o „�` -:, ®2016 BEPLON PSOOIICiS. NI Ri�r6 flearretl.Fa maeintmmafion wail au wefsRe: wwwLsecppmM1nc�om Pmlldin USA SPM11/16 VIPER L f SERIES LARGE MPEA LUMINAIRE SPECIFICATIONS Intended Use: The Beacon Viper Iumlnake is available in two saes with a wide choice of clitisront LID wattage configurations and optical distributions designed to replace HID lighting up to 1000W MH or HPS. Luminaires are Suitable for wet locations. Construction: • Manufactured with die cast aluminum. • Coated with a polyester finish that meets ASTM B117 corrosion test requirements and ASTM D522 cracking and loss of adhesion test requirements. • External hardware Is corrosion assistant. • One piece optical cartridge system consisting of an LED engine, LED lamps, optics, gasket and stainless steel bezel. • Cartridge is held together with internal brass standoffs soldered to the board so that it can be field replaced as a one piece optical system. • Two-piece silicone and micmcellular polyurethane foam gasket ensures a weather-proof seal around each indvidual optic. Electrical: • Luminaire accepts t 00V through 277V, 50 Hz to 60 Hz (UNVi, 347V, or 480V input. • Power factor is >_ .90 at full load. • All electrical components are rated at 50,000 hours at full load and 25"C ambient conditions per MIL- 217F Notice 2. • Dimming drivers are standard, but must contact factory to request wiring leads for purpose of external dimming controls. • Component -to -component wiring within the luminaire may carry no more than 80% of rated bad and is certified by ILL for use at 600VAG at 90•C or higher. • Plug disconnects are certified by UL for use at 600 VAC, 13A a higher. 13A rating applies to primary (AC) side only. • Fudure electrical compartment shall contain all Lon driver components and shall be provided with a push-button terminal block for AC power connections. • Optional 7-pin ANSI C136.41-2013 twist -lock photo control receptacle available. Compatible with ANSI C136.41 external wireless control devices. • Surge protection - 20kA. • Lifewield- Circuit - protects lummaire from excessive temperature. The device shall activate at a specific, factory -preset temperature, and progressively reduce power over a finite temperature range. Operation shall be smooth and undetectable to the eye. Thermal circuit is designed to gad on', allowing the luminalre to revert to full power in the event of an interruption of its power supply, or faulty wiring connection to the drivers. The device shall be able to co -exist with other G-i GV control devices (occupancy sensors, external dimmers, etc.). CERTIFICATIONS/LISTINGS c us ,,.•.r Type Controls/Options: • Available with an optional passive infrared (PIR) motion sensor capable of detecting motion 360" wound the lamination. When rw motion's detected for the specified time, fits motion response system reduces the wattage to factory preset level, reducing the light level accordingly. When motion is detected by the PIR sensor, the luminare returns to full wattage and full light output. Please contact Beacon Products if project requirements vary from standard configuration • Available with Enargeni for optional set dimming, timed dimming with simple tlday, or fined dimming based on time of night (see • In addition, Viper can be specified with SiteSyncTM wireless control system for reduction in energy and maintenance costs while optimizing light quality 2417. For more detals, see ordering information or visit: www hubbellliahtino o�e_svnc Installation: • Mounting options for horizontal arm, vertical tenon or traditional arm mourning available. Mounting hardware included. Finish: • ITS polyester powder -coat electrostafically applied and thernocured. IFS finish consists of a five stage pretreatment regimen with a polymer prirtrer sealer and top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. • The finish meets the AAMA 2604 perferrnance specification which includes passing a 3000 hour sat spray test for corrosion resistance and resists cracking or loss of adhesion per ASTM D522 and resists surface impacts of up to 160 inch -pounds. Listings: • DesignLights Consortium (DLC) qualified, consult DLC websne for more details: http:// www.dwrgnlights.org/QPL • Listed to UL1598 and CSA22.2#250.0-24 for wet locations and 40°C ambient temperatures • 3G rated for ANSI C136.31 high vibration applications with SF2 mounting • IDA approved Warranty. Five year limited warranty for more information visit: www.hubbellligMing.conVe rceswananty Approvals PRODUCT IMAGE(S) DIMENSIONS A B C D Weight EPA 29.12" 24.19" 14.25" 4.13" 25.0 Ibs 1.2 IF (740 mm) (614 mm) (362 mm) (105 mm) (11.3 kg) MOUNTING OPTIONS Sae view Rectangtiar vim (PA) So& New tenon, min 4' long. �—iL Sae Vow Beck New 2-3/e' 00 SLIP Fi ter (SF2) �— 27.90" T rn i PK2 2-3/8" Atljuslable Knucae 29.94" IT WB Wal9acket 1 238' O 550- 1 II'rIIIIIII �IfIIII 5' Y �- Beacon Products • 2041 58th Avenue Circle East BradentocFL 34203 • Prone. 800-345-4928 .xr� ' HUBBEL.L. ®jWAjjrtnN Duetoourcontinuerefforts to improve our products. product specifications aesublectm changewithout notice. Ugheino 02n17 BEACON PRODUCTS. At Fights Reserved" For more information visit our waaaz:vrwx.EeaosiumucRcom"PnnterinLlS4SPECV17 ORDERING INFORMATION ORDERING EXAMPLE:VP-L/9GNB-280/4K/f4/UW/PCR-NBLCflWBBT III Viper 64NB-135 135W LED anay BONB-180 18OWLEDamay BONB-235 235W LED array 96NB-220 220W LED array 96NB-280 28OW LED array 96NB-395 395W LED array T1 Type T2 Type 11 T3 Type III T4 Type M T5R Type V, rectangular T5QM Type V, square medium T5W Type V, round wide PR Front now auto optic 3K 3GOOK 4K 4000K 5K 50o0K UNV 1201 347V 347K 480V 480V T1L Type 1 left T1R Type 1 right TZL Type 2left T211 Type 2 right TX Type 3 left T3111 Type 3 right T& Type 4left UR Type 4 right FRL Front now left FRR Front row right PCR-TL 7 pin twist lock receptacle with photo control PRC-SC 7pin twist lock recep- tacle with sha6ng Lap 2PP dual pow- er teed PCRU 7 pin heist lock recep- tacle HSS-90 house side shield 90e HSS-180 house side shield 180' BLCa backlight control MDD'u motion dimming detector GENT-X V imaginal SWPA SdeSync Wireless Pre -Commission SWPM'''' SOeSyncwreless Pre -Commission w/ Motion Detection PRECOMMISSIONED SITESYNG ORDERING INMWnON: When ordering a fi0or2 with the SteSyrm aprons mntrol option, addRiwal informa9on will be mquiredto wmplOe the order The Saes,c Commissioning Foam oranimate someone ima rahon omen the completed.This farm inCudes Protect location Grwp information, and Operating schedules. For more detailed information pleas visitww.v.HUObeIILgINnO.wMproduc5/sihsync or cmltat Hubbell Lghting teat.ppod at(800) 345-4928. SII i fiYmrea who MotOar ward (Si repulre the morning height of the flMum for selection Of the lens ExaroplesW-S'8oNB-235503NNV5WPAV[HT SteBync only lP-5/BOxaz3YSKR3NNV5WPM 20FMNDBT saesync WM Motion Grand MOD ORDMMG IIf0aMlIrl When pNeM1g a home with the motion detection option (MDD), please Specify the aparaete Information. These patois Me SpeelBed In Me nNedag a5 Moral In the trample below. W S180NB 23Y51c/f3Nfli- Ito 30 mot. -33%or 50%- ?? /IWJDBr Highto Dr Oehy Low Le.Rl Motgraglkgi 'MhKSpe ygmupwdz elMumation SUme Oapder OW+.w.MbWllgMq,cm yrlefmrutrxdek, 'Specify time delay', drain, E and mounting (light T4 opdc mid ' To mate wtiw heft or dim W degrees, op" L or Rafter me 11" drim im fomple T4L. ' Not arenal wM other cmbol or wwr opt ors ° When adanng Dorgan, speedy the Wine arm, coda leumpli GENT-N) See Enerarl btoaa are immorme tOrseti hae end optlmis. Nm availadla MM se .atio. ' W1 avoia ale Ion NN or 80V mpN. Site5Unc1 r Control is availabblle from brands in a broad range of oduct families. BSP bird spike RA rectangular an for round or square pole mount Round Pole Adapter included. SP2 2 3/8" OD slip -Titter PK2 2 3/8" adjustable knuckle WB wall bracket (use with SF2 or PK2), SF2 standard BBT Basic Black Textured BMT Black Matte Textured WHT White Textured MBT Metallic Bronze Textured BZT Bronze Textured DBT Dark Bronze Textured GYS Gray Smooth DPS Dark Platinum Smooth GNT Green Textured MST Metallic Silver Textured MTT Metallic Titanium Textured DWI Old World Imn RAL Accessories arr l Services (Ordered Separately) DescriptionCatalog Number SWUSB' SUSync loaded on USB flash drive (Windows based only) SWTAB' SOeSync Windows Tablet SWBRG- SRei Wimless Bridge Node -when ordering soh Sdebyn4 one of the interface areas moan be Mown ar4 ordered separately. Each area warrairs the SiteSyar Drew GUI and Bridge Node. a N real an mortal Bridge Node con be ordered. Deslgntights Consortium qualified. ry Consult DLC wimsBe for more details: htg,:/AYww.designlghls.Orgi LEFT ROTATED OPTIC RIGHT ROTATED OPTIC J I1�1� M — \ J \—____ Beacon Products • 2041 58th Avenue Circle Fast Bradenton, FL 34203 • Phone: 800-345-4928 ' HLJBBELL 0BEACON Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. Lighting -^"• ­r".1a 02016 BEAWN PRODUCTS, M Rights Res -For mom ln!, inst our wetsirs. www.heawnpodre6.com Nmedln USA SPEC 2/17 PERFORMANCE DATA tell P t r FR/T1 2 T3 64 625 MA 136W T4 T5QM T5R T5W i�t 15922 116 t 2 0 1 -trr 15762 r 115 2 0 1 ii� i 13534 99 2 0 1 14274 104 3 0 3 14131 103 3 0 3 12133 89 3 0 14137 103 3 0 3 13996 102 3 3 12017 88 3 0 15511 113 2 0 4 15356 112 2 0 3 13184 96 2 0 3 15511 113 4 0 2 15356 112 4 0 2 13184 96 3 0 2 15785 11 4 0 4 15627 114 4 0 4 13417 98 4 0 4 15372 112 4 0 2 15217 111 4 0 2 13067 95 4 0 2 80 700 MA 1BOW FRrr1 21132 117 2 0 2 20322 113 2 0 2 17447 97 2 1 0 2 T2 18888 105 3 0 1 4 18699 104 3 0 4 16055 89 3 0 3 T3 18700 104 3 0 1 3 18513 103 3 0 3 15895 88 3 1 0 1 3 T4 20571 114 3 0 1 4 20365 113 3 0 4 17485 97 3 0 1 3 T50M 20571 114 4 0 2 20365 113 4 0 2 17485 97 4 0 1 2 T5R 20944 11 4 0 4 20733 115 4 0 4 17803 99 4 0 4 T5W 20290 113 5 0 3 20088 112 5 0 3 17065 95 4 0 2 80 875 MA 235W FWrt 24866 106 2 0 2 24615 105 2 0 2 21136 90 2 0 2 T2 23070 98 3 0 4 22839 97 3 0 4 19609 83 3 0 4 T3 21947 93 3 0 4 21725 92 3 0 4 18655 79 3 0 3 T4 24360 103 3 0 4 1 24028 102 3 0 5 20632 8B 3 0 4 T50M 23138 98 4 0 2 1 22905 97 4 0 2 19W 94 4 0 2 T5R 24779 105 5 0 5 24541 104 5 0 5 21070 90 4 0 4 T5W 24175 103 5 0 3 23931 102 5 0 3 20548 87 5 0 3 96 709 mA 220W FR?1 25358 113 2 0 2 25104 112 2 1 0 2 21554 96 2 0 2 T2 22665 101 3 0 1 4 22438 100 3 0 4 19265 86 3 0 4 T3 22440 100 3 0 1 4 22216 99 3 1 0 4 19134 86 3 0 3 T4 24685 110 3 0 1 5 24438 109 3 0 5 20982 94 3 0 4 T50M 24685 110 4 0 1 2 24438 109 4 1 0 2 20982 94 4 0 2 T5R 25133 112 5 0 1 5 24882 111 5 0 5 21363 96 4 0 4 T5W 24349 109 5 0 1 3 24106 108 5 1 0 3 20803 93 5 1 0 3 96 875 MA 28OW FR(T1 29839 106 3 0 2 29541 105 3 1 0 2 25363 90 2 0 2 T2 27369 98 4 0 5 27096 97 4 1 0 5 23264 83 3 1 0 4 T3 26336 93 3 0 4 26073 92 3 0 4 22365 79 3 0 4 T4 29129 1 3 5 28837 103 3 0 5 24759 88 3 1 0 T50M 28890 103 5 0 3 28601 102 5 0 3 245% 88 4 0 2 T513 29185 105 5 0 5 28893 104 5 0 5 24809 89 5 0 5 T5W 29011 102 5 0 4 28720 101 5 0 4 24263 86 5 0 3 96 1225mA 395W FWr1 39653 101 3 0 2 39260 100 3 0 2 33371 85 0 2 T2 35997 91 4 0 5 35641 90 4 0 5 30295 77 4 0 5 T3 35840 91 4 0 5 35485 90 4 0 5 30162 77 3 0 4 T4 35455 90 3 0 5 35104 89 3 0 5 29839 76 3 TS M 38388 97 5 0 3 38008 96 5 0 3 32306 82 5 ME T5R 39117 99 5 0 5 38730 98 5 0 5 32921 83 5 T5W 36984 93 5 0 4 36528 93 5 0 4 31049 79 5 Wmenvakesare from lhntoorWrte eerfomied may anwasa result000-UMe-Iuvmentand Wfi-Aoo- Beacon Products • 2041 58th Avenue Circle East Bradenton, FL 34203 • Phone. 800-345-4928 �. ® HUBBELL Due to our continued efforts to improve our Products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. wLighting 0 2016 SWON PRODUCTS, All elObk aeservea • For mme inlmmaAon vka wrammde'. wxw.b.a.,W.ck. • Prinietl in USA SPED V17 PHOTOMETNICS Type VP-L-96NB-280-5K-t1 R Type III VP-L-96NB-280-5K-T3 ELECTRICAL DATA Type 11 VP-L-96NB-280-5K-T2 Type V Square Medium VP-L-96NB-280-5K-TOM NUMBER DRIVE CURRENT (Amps) #OF LEDS OF DRIVERS CURRENT (ni INPUTVOLTAGE SYSTEMPOWER (V) (W) S :rTrl• tef.� DRILL PATTERN G mpatible wit, Pole drill panem, B3 S7g9ested Arm t top of Pok �--H4W 1111 Ann Type M VP-L96N0-280-5K-T4 Type V Rectangular VP-L-96NB-280-5K-T5R PROJECTED LUMEN MAINTENANCE Type V Round Wide VPL-%NB-280-5K-TSW Front Bow Auld Optic /Type I VP-L-96NB-280-5K-FR VP-L-961413-280-51(41 rav ' Projected per IBM M-21-11 Oats references ibe edrapdatil performance projecrone for the ]OgmA base most In a 25°C amblenL rased m 1r.rog lwpm of Lm tasting per IssNA uf-eo-ra. Mn Ilse these tam W determine nets0ve lumen output for average ambisrn temperatures hom 0-40°C 132-104-Fj. Config. EPA � Config. � EPA E I M� Beacon Products a 2041 58th Avenue Circle East Bradenton, FL 34203 • Phone. 800-345-4928 U69ELL Q H N Due to our contmued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without robes. r.ueeeu Lighting �., .._. ,:...,. 02016BRCON PflCDMSwww,eciwrPraIaot.Wm. PCnrudin USA SPEC2/17 QSP/RDI/TRP [Co" LED SPECIFICATIONS Applications: • Architectural wallpack in three stylish shapes with molded contours to accentu- ate building architecture. Provides excellent illumination in energy -saving LED systems. • Black box accessory available for surface conduit application Construction: • Die-cast aluminum housing and door • Seven powder coat standard finishes, plus custom color options LED: • 30 high power LEDs deliver up to 6,900 lumens • Up to 118 Lumens per watt • Different lenses offer a variety of distribution patterns - Type II, III, and N (Forward throw) • 3000K - 70 CRI, 4000K - 70 CRI, and 5000K - 70 CRI, CCT nominal Operating Temperature: •-40°C/-40°F to 40°C/104`F for 350mA •-30°C/-22°F to 40°C/104`F for 530mA and 700mA Electrical: • Three driver options: 34w at 350mA (1 driver), 53w at 530mA (1 driver) and 68w at 700mA (2 drivers) Type Electrical (Cont): • 120-277VAC, 50/60Hz • Power factor> 90% • THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) <20% • 10 KA, 10 KV, 270 joules surge suppressor Controls: Drivers are 0-10V dimming standard; Photocell and occupancy sensor options available for complete on/off and dimming control Listings: • UL 1598 listed for use in wet locations • 4K and 5K models meet DesignLights Consortium (DLC) qualifications, consult DLC website for more details: http,//www.desionlights.ora/0PL • Zero uplight (UO), dark sky, neighbor friendly • Drivers IP66 and RoHS compliant Warranty: For more information visit: htto,//www.hubbelloutdoor.com/resources warranty/ SNIPPING INFORMATION i OSP 11�"7) Length 20.5 (52) Width Height 10.5(26) 11(28) 801 2) 20.5 (52) 9.5 (24) 12 (30)TRP 3) 18.5 (47) 9.5 (24) 11.5 (29) CERTIFICATIONSNJSTINGS C OL US 1 hamK n.d wags ccra mN ORDERING INFORMATION ORDERING EXAMPLE: TRP-30L5K-053-2-U-DB 3OL G P OSP of artersntleru 30L 30 High 3K' 3000K RDI Radius brightness 4K 4000K TRIP Trapezoid 5K 5000K 0 SF2RUI_0I1NlQ L I G K T I N G Approvals PRODUCT IMAGES) r. QSP RDI TRP DIMENSIONS v.30SP (no mm) Weit: 11.61bsgh5.26 kg �zao mm� �<so�mm� v- RDI ryiwdmm)� Weight 13.1 Ibs 5.94 kg �355wmm) 1 _ TRP Weight 13.216s 5.98 kg ~(33a mm)� —i (420 mm)� anz .ass Qoe3 Mounting Plate O 53ai Dimensions as I l P 035 350mA 2 Type II U 1201-277V CC3 Custom PC' Photocontroi BBU'A Integral 053 530MA 3 Type 111 P 120V Color (Must specify indi- battery for BL Black vidual voltage) 120 or 277V 070 700mA 4 Type N 2' 208V DB Bronze SCDa On/Off Occupancy nsor only to 3for C 3' 240V FIG Forest no light output (Must specify 4' 277V Green when no motion individual GB Gray detected voltage) spevy voxaAefwvoFage specific optioren20.27/y myna PC and rising, 120 or 2]7V onN for BBIA y SCP'A Programmable F Fusing 'MustoNer mini mum of one remote ountol to program Nmmhg satingd, a-mV tidy adjustable dimming PS Platinum occupancy sensor, (Muste wM auiomatio daylight calibration and dinluenal deer shop, l2gy a 2TN only specify ' Consult factory far Custom cobr oaten RD Red factory default is individual ' X0 guailfimbon 4K aid SK medals ony 10% light output voltage) ' PCopponrgndill. inTIP 3!0med1N V WH White °96Uonly meamein TRP,nSOmA in sear r (� Spaulding Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SG 29607 • Phone: 864-678-1000 ® HUBBELL SPRULOING L I c x r l x G Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without notice. Lighting 0 W16 SPNA➢NG UGHNG, Msign Reerred• par mare inlarmatm 34sK our xetaatx.PmdM N" WIROW6 Golf ACCESSORIES - Order separately BB-GEO-ID( L 4.125"2 10.4 mm 5mm BB GEO-)0( Back box with 4 - 1/2"threaded conduit holes, specify finish by mplacin w. with nish selection eg. Dark Bronze "DB" ' Mot order mimmum or ore refrote W to pro,ram@coming Settings.o-im toll, a4,,pNk tlimmifg wM eutores, daylight Wit lso and dlNerem Nme delay sellings, 120VW 27N only Po To WA 1111-GE0.%X— Mounted to luminaire Fixture gasket 4-1/2"conduilermies Wall gasket PERFORMANCF DATA '0806nergercy mode lufnen ouW, W hanx, onN ELECTRICAL DATA LUMINAIREAMBIENT TEMPERATURE FACTOR ILATF) PROJECTED LUMEN MAINTENANCE �ljuq;f.1111 1 III I III ,11II 11111 25°C/77°F 1.00 0.98 0.95 .94 .91 0.93 0.91 0.8640°C/104°F 0.99 0.96 1 Nkpa 219C, 7WrrA, 85-CTs,1aWxvs Dap mfemf Ve ee pdaled p&fIXmance pfge m for ft TNP base model in 4 % ambientbaud on 10 000 fours of LED tesgfg per IESn4 LM-W-W. PHOTOMETRIC REPORTS (530mA. 4000x) 11rc 11 0' C 210' C 120' C 025 C 7F1.00 030`C 040' C 950' C 98 Use these factors to deleftnine more ire lumen output hx average ambiem temperakim Iron 0-40"C (32-104"F). Spaulding Lighting • 701 Millennium Boulevard • Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864-678-1000 ' HUBBELL SPHULOINIM Due to our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are subject to charge without notice. Ughuing L I G N T I a G 0W16SPk]-DlNGDGHrNG anlghp lks¢Ived•ra mtte inhmratlon,vat our ws4sip: www.WMJtlil9kehlM&apm • RMledin OS4 aVAMFSPPC lVis SPB - SpectraTm Bollard • Cast aluminum hood and tamper resistant hardware • Type 5 distribution • Upper reflector improves lighting performance and illuminates the hood • Adaptable appearance is perfect for contemporary or traditional installations TYPE • Two housing sizes and matching bollard offer consistent whole -site solutions • Durable and long lasting design provides worry -free maintenance • Powder coat finish in 13 standard colors with a polymer primer sealer 1. LUMINAIRE 2. LAMPBALLAST . 3. HOOD FINISH i 4. COLOR , 5. OPTIONS 1. LUMINAIRE SPB (Spacer? bollard) SPB (Spectra LED bollard) 2. LAMP/BALLAST LEP 11 LEDSW 14.8 wala. Warm whip (30 M Neufmi wh8e (400K), Bright white WIN(). 1200uu277volt SylMvficdistribution. 12LED-W W (Warm while) 12LED-NW (Neubal white) 12LED-BW (Bright while) 6LED anay. 80 watts Warm white (3000K), Neuhal white (4000K), Bright white (5000K). 127thtu277volt. Asymmebricdehibution. 6LED-W W (Warm white) 6LED-NW (Neubal white) 6LED-BW (Bright while) COMPACT FLUORESCENT (1200m277vo11) Use 4- pin 26, 32, of42 watt lamp. Specify wattage CF (-18 C slaning temp) METAL HALIDE (1201277mItballasl) Medium Lase, EO-17Imp 50MH 70MH G12base, i-6ceramiclamp 70MHT6 HIGH PRESSURE SODI IM (120720B724071 wtballad) Mediumbase, ED-171amp 50HPS 70HPS 'Alllialurespmwm:d I0r277 volts, unless specified Lamps ral includes LED drivers am univarsil input. 3. HOOD FINISH (OPLI(1IIAL) Hood finish will malch lummalre finish unless seledirgareof8ce options. Hood underside is unfinished to deeelopapa0na STS(Slaimess steel) COP fNmuml copper) 4. COLOR WH Ardic While VBU Verde Blue BL Black CRT Cohen BLT Male Bid MAL MaleAlummum DB ON*Bronze MG Medium Grey DGN Dad; Gran AGN Antique Green TT uranium LG Light Grey WDS WeatferedServes RAL Premium Color MDB Brame Metallic CUSTOM "Conrad Faday 5. OPTIONS 347 (347vo1 ballast 1202271347. Not available with electronic ballast) BBU (Balerybackup powers a compact Buorescenl lamp for up to rimaymoules during a power failure Ougut of the32 watt Imp will be575lumerrs. Limpid from the 42 coal Imp will be 750Lemurs. Balerypace is 9.375'x2375'x 15'. Test monitorpWbe with indicaforlight and test switch are included Not recommenced for derides with kmperalums below50T Not available for LED.) LDL (Lightty diffused lots) ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING architechral 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 arealighting P626.968.5666 I F626.3692695 I www.aal.net Copyright®2012 I REV 2.15 SPECIFICATIONS SPB HOUSING The fixture housing shall be all cast aluminum. A356 alloy, free of any porosity, foreign materials, or cosmetic fillers. The ballast shall be mounted internally and accessed by loosening two captive bolts and lifting off the top of the fixture. The top cover shall be hinged and secured with one captive tool -less fastener for relamping. The top shall seal with a molded silicone gasket. The upper reflector cone shall be matte finished anodized aluminum. The lens shall be clear seamless acrylic sealed to the housing with a molded silicone gasket on the top and bottom. The vertical struts shall be 316 stainless steel tubing. All internal and external hardware shall be stainless steel. All female threads on the aluminum parts shall be cast -in -place brass inserts to ensure no thread seizure. LENSES/ELEMENTS The frosted glass diffuser element shall be borosilicate glass with a twist on connection to the lower cone assembly. The cone shall be matte finished anodized aluminum. ELECTRICAL The ballast shall be integral to the fixture, mounted on a prewired module with a quick disconnect plug. The ballast module shall have keyhole slots and be removable by loosening two screws. Sockets shall be pulse rated porcelain. HID ballasts shall be high power factor, rate for -30"C starting. The compact fluorescent ballast shall be electronic for use with 4 pin lamps (G%24q-4 socket) rated for-180C starting temperature. Ballasts are multitap, wired at the factory for 277 volts, unless specified. Driver will accept 120 thru 277 volts input. JOB TYPE NOTES See next page If�l SPB - SpectraTM Bollard FINISH Fixture finish shall consist of a five stage pretreatment regimen with a polymer primer sealer, oven dry off, and top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. The finish shall meet the AAMA 605.2 performance specification which includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resistance. CERTIFICATION Fixtures shall be listed with ETL for outdoor, wet location use, UL1598 and Canadian CSA Std. C22.2 no.250. WARRANTY / TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE Download hoc, /Iwww h uhhelll oli rn ! c c/ m '/ ML reserves the right to changeprodact specifications without notice TYPE DIMENSIONS 1m SPB WATTAGE: BO LUMEN OUTPUT: 3753 B2 U4 G3 FORWARD LIGHT LUMEN FL 30° 2.6% 148 FM 60° 9.2% 515 FH 80° 9.7% 545 FVH 90° 4.6% 260 BACK LIGHT BL 30° 2.6% 148 BM 60' 9.2% 515 BH 80° 9.7% 545 BVH 90° 4.6% 260 UPLIGHT ILL too- 5.1% 286 UH 180' 9.4% 529 4'MOUNTING HEIGHT SPB 12LED BW WATTAGE: 14.8 LUMEN OUTPUT: 719 BO U3 G1 FORWARD LIGHT FL 30° 3.6% FM 60° 13.4% FH 80° 15.3% FVH 90' BIT% BACK LIGHT BL 30' 36% BM 60° 13.4% BH So' 15.3% BVH 90' 8.1% UPLIGHT UL too' 11.7% UH 180" 7.4% 53 4MOUNTING HEIGHT IES files can be found at www.aal.net ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING amhttechural 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 arealighting P626.968.5666 I F626.369.2695 I www.aal.net Copyright ©2012 I REV 2.15 UPLIGHT 21.8% DOWNUGHT78.2% 48.5 UPLIGHT 19.1% DOWNLIGHT 80.9% 1 2 1 HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS FOR MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING CHANHASSEN, MN BKBM Job No. 15139 December 04, 2014 Revised February 18, 2015 Revised March 20, 2015 Revised March 16, 2017 Prepared for: Headwaters Development 17550 Hemlock Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Contact: Michael Hoagberg Prepared by: BKBM Engineers, Inc. 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55429-2518 (763)843-0420 Project Information Calculator Version: Version 2: June 2014 Project Name: Mission Hills User Name / Company Name: BKBM Engineering Date: March 16, 2017 Project Description: Site Information Retention Requirement (inches): 1.1 Site's Zip Code: 55317 Annual Rainfall (inches): 29.9 Phosphorus EMC (mg/1): 0.3 TSS EMC (mg/1): 54.5 Total Site Area Land Cover A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Forest/Open Space - Undisturbed, protected 0 forest/open space or reforested land Managed Turf - disturbed, graded for yards or 4.5 4.5 other turf to be mowed/managed Impervious Area (acres) 4.14 Total Area (acres) 8.639999 Site Areas Routed to BMlPs Land Cover A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Total (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Forest/open Space - Undisturbed, protected 0 forest/open space or reforested land Managed Turf - disturbed, graded for yards or 4.5 4.5 other turf to be mowed/managed Impervious Area (acres) 4.14 Total Area (acres) 8.64 Summary Information Performance Goal Requirement Performance goal volume retention requirement: 16531 ft3 Volume removed by BMPs towards performance goal: 3271 W Percent volume removed towards performance goal 20 % Annual Volume and Pollutant Load Reductions Post development annual runoff volume 11.3426 acre-ft Annual runoff volume removed by BMPs: 1.6879 acre-ft Percent annual runoff volume removed: 15 % Post development annual particulate P load: 5.09 Ibs Annual particulate P removed by BMPs: 2.85 Ibs Post development annual dissolved P load: 4.16 Ibs Annual dissolved P removed by BMPs: 2.71 Ibs Percent annual total phosphorus removed: 60 % Post development annual TSS load: 1681 Ibs Annual TSS removed by BMPs: 1129 Ibs Percent annual TSS removed: 67 % BMP Summary Performance Goal Summary BMP Name BMP Volume Capacity (ft3) Volume Recieved (ft3) Volume Retained (ft3) Volume Outflow (ft3) Percent Retained (%) 1 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 871 7866 871 6995 11 2 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 754 2316 754 1562 33 3 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 627 1517 627 890 41 4 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 172 960 172 788 18 5 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 710 5220 710 4510 14 side slope for area 7 8 200 8 192 4 side slope for area 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 - Swale main channel 38 559 38 521 7 3 -Swale main channel 1 91 439 1 91 348 21 Annual Volume Summary Volume Volume From Volume Volume Percent BMP Name From Direct Upstream Retained outflow Retained Watershed BMPs (acre-ft) (acre-ft) (%) (acre-ft) (acre-ft) 1 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 5.0714 0 0.4874 4.584 10 2 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 1.5552 0 0.3289 1.2263 21 3 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 1.1123 0 1 0.2611 0.8512 23 4 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 0.2904 0.3155 0.0875 0.5184 14 5 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 2.0351 1.7702 0.4197 3.3856 11 side slope for area 7 0.2018 0 0.0233 0.1785 12 side slope for area 1 0.2803 0 0 0.2803 0 2 - Swale main channel 0.3375 0 0.022 0.3155 7 3 - Swale main channel 0.4586 0 0.0579 0.4007 13 Particulate Phosphorus Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (Ibs) Load From Upstream BMPs (Ibs) Load Retained (Ibs) Outflow Load (Ibs) Percent Retained (%) 1 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 2.28 0 1.15 1.13 50 2 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 0.7 0 0.4 0.3 57 3 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 0.5 0 0.29 0.21 58 4 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 0.13 0.04 0.09 0.08 _ 53 5 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 0.91 0.34 0.64 0.61 51 side slope for area 7 0.09 0 0.01 0.08 12 side slope for area 1 0.13 0 0 0.13 0 2 - Swale main channel 0.15 0 0.11 0.04 75 3 - Swale main channel 0.21 0 0.16 0.05 76 Dissolved Phosphorus Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (Ibs) Load From Upstream BMPs (Ibs) Load Retained (Ibs) Outflow Load (Ibs) Percent Retained (%) 1 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 1.86 0 1.19 0.67 64 2 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 0.57 0 0.39 0.18 68 3 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 0.41 0 0.16 0.25 39 4 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.08 66 5 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 0.75 0.48 0.79 0.44 64 side slope for area 7 0.07 0 0.01 0.06 12 side slope for area 1 0.1 0 0 0.1 0 2 - Swale main channel 0.12 0 0.01 0.11 7 3 - Swale main channel 0.17 0 0.02 0.15 13 TSS Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (Ibs) Load From Upstream BMPS (Ibs) Load Retained (Ibs) Outflow Load (Ibs) Percent Retained (%) 1 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 752 0 480 272 64 2 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 231 0 158 1 73 68 3 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 165 0 114 51 69 4 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 43 15 38 20 66 5 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 302 90 252 140 64 side slope for area 7 30 0 3 27 12 side slope for area 1 42 0 0 42 0 2 - Swale main channel 50 0 35 15 70 3 -Swale main channel 68 0 49 1 19 72 BMP Schematic nd' 2 -Swale main channel 1 - Bioretention basin (with underdrain) 4 - Biore®in (with urdedraw) - Bi t basi I- -th O 2 - Bioretention basin (with side sI.W for area 1 undndrain) ore a ion n i _ Swale ..in rhanrml underdrain) 5 - Bioretencon basin (with underdrain) side slope for area 7 BKBM ENGINEERS HYDROLOGY FOR MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA December 4, 2014 Revised February 18, 2015 Revised March 20, 2015 Revised March 16, 2017 EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION The site is a 8.64 acre parcel located at the south west corner of the intersection of Highway 101 and 86Ih Street West. Currently the site is a farm field used for row crops. A majority of the site drains to the culverts/storm sewer located in the north east and south east corners of the site. A portion of the site drains to the adjacent property to the east. All drainage is via sheet flow and shallow concentrated flow. No storm water management is currently being provided for this site. EXISTING SITE DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS Detail 1/C500 of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shows the existing delineated site drainage areas. Table I briefly summarizes the ground cover characteristics and drainage routing of each numbered drainage area. Most of the site drainage to each respective drainage point is via overland sheet flow and shallow concentrated flow. Table 1: Existing Site Drainage Descriptions (Refer to Detail 1/C500 Drainage Description Drainage Routes to: Area No. 1 North portion of the site, row crops Intersection of Highway 101 and 861h Street West 2 East portion of the site, row crops Intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 312 off ram 3 South portion of the site, row crops Adjacent property to east EXISTING SITE DRAINAGE FLOW RATES HydroCAD was used to model the existing site hydrology. The NRCS Method ofAbstractions was used in the model with Type 11, 24-hour rainfall events from the NOAA Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates (refer to Table 3). NRCS curve numbers were derived based on topographic survey information (completed by Sunde Land Surveying) and information on cover and underlying soil types from geotechnical information from Braun Intertec Corporation. Table 2 lists the derived curve runoff numbers for each cover type. 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard. Minneapolis. MN 55429 763-843-0420 (F) 763-843-0421 425 Second Street SE, Suite 950, Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 319-3654001 (F) 319-365-4002 104 Third Avenue NW. Suite 304, Mandan, ND 58554 701-220-8450 w .bkbm.conn Table 2: NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group and Runoff Curve Numbers Ground Cover Type Hydrologic Soil Group Curve Number (C Existing Pervious Area D 89 Proposed Pervious Area D 80 Paving/Buildings NA 98 Peak runoff computations were performed for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year/24-hour return period rainfall events, listed in Table 3, and the 100-year 10-day snow melt event (10.9-inches in 10-days). The weighted curve number for each drainage area is based on a weighted average of each area of ground cover type as listed in Table 2. Peak HydroCAD runoff computations are summarized in Table 4 and are included as an appendix to this report. Table 3: NOAA Atlas 14 24-hour Duration Storm Events for Each Return Period inches 2-year I0- ear 100- ear Snow -Melt 2.87" 4.26" 7.38" 7.20" Table 4: Summary of Peak Runoff Rates: Existing Drainage Areas etaill/C500 Drainage Area No. Time of Concentration (minutes) 24-hour Storm Events Peak Runoff Rates 2-year (cfs) 10-year (cfs) 100-year (cfs) Snow -Melt cfs 1 13.7 7.10 12.52 23.06 1.61 2 10.6 8.84 15.56 28.45 1.79 3 12.3 3.21 5.66 10.38 0.69 Total 1 19.15 33.74 61.89 4.09 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION The proposed development will include the addition of an approximate 52,000 square foot senior housing and daycare building and 8 townhome buildings. parking, walking paths, and sidewalks will be provided to service the proposed building. Stormwater Management for the site will be provided via 5 filtration basins, sump catch basins, and grass swales. Due to the clay onsite soils, infiltration is not feasible. PROPOSED SITE DRAINAGE ROUTING Detail 2/C500 of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shows the proposed delineated site drainage areas. Table 5 gives a brief summary and routing of the proposed drainage patterns on site. Table 5: Proposed Site Drainage Descriptions (Refer to Detail 2/C500 Drainage Description Drainage Routes to: Area No. 1 Bituminous trail and grass area to Sheet flows offsite to south south 2 West parking lot and majority of Sheet flows and open channel flows to onsite building roof storm sewer which discharges into filtration basin # 1 3 Portion of building roof and patio area Sheet flows and open channel flows to west of senior building. filtration basin #2 4 Portion of townhome roofs, parking, Sheet flows and open channel flows to and grassy area. filtration basin #3, overflows to filtration basin #5 5 Portion of town home roofs and main Sheet flows and open channel flows to drive filtration basin #4, overflows to filtration basin #5 6 Portion of town home roofs, grass Sheet flows and open channel flows to Swale, and town home drive access filtration basin #5, overflows to northeast comer of site 7 Townhome roof and grass area to Sheet flows and open channel flows to northwest. northwest corner of site. PROPOSED SITE STORM WATER TREATMENT HydroCAD was used to model the proposed site hydrology. The NRCS Method of Abstractions was used with Type H, 24-hour rainfall events from the NOAA Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates (refer to Table 3). NRCS curve numbers were derived based on a weighted average of each area of ground cover type. Refer to Table 2 for runoff curve numbers used in the proposed computations. The project is located within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and the City of Chanhassen. The most stringent treatment and runoff standards for the two agencies are the following; Water Quality — Provide for at least sixty percent (60 percent) annual removal efficiency for total phosphorus, and at least ninety percent (90%) annual removal efficiency for total suspended solids from site runoff. The onsite abstraction of runoff may be included in demonstrating compliance with the total suspended solids and total phosphorus removal requirements. Volume Control — Provide for the abstraction onsite of 1.1 inches of runoff from impervious surface of the parcel; • Where infiltration or filtration facilities, practices or systems are proposed, pretreatment of runoff must be provided. • The bottom of infiltration facilities must be at least three feet above the seasonal high water table. Peak Stormwater Runoff Control — Limit peak runoff flow rates to that from existing conditions for the 2-, 10- and 100-year frequency storm events using a nested 24- hour rainfall distribution, and a 100-year frequency, 10-day snowmelt event, for all points where stormwater discharge leaves the site; To meet the above requirements a series of filtration basins are being proposed. Pretreatment to the filtration basins is being provided via sump catch basins and grass swales. A MIDS model was run for the site to demonstrate compliance with the water quality requirement. The inputs and results of the MIDS model are provided as an attachment to this report. Infiltration is not feasible for this site due to the presence of clay soils. In liu of using infiltration to meet the volume control requirement, the filtration basins have been sized to fully filter 1.1 inches over the impervious areas. See Table 6. However, the draintile within the filtration basins have been raised above the native soils by approximately 3" to promote infiltration into the clay soils. This will remove approximately 1.69 acre feet on an annual basis, please refer to the MIDS results. Table 6: Filtration Requirement Filtration Basin Impervious Area to Basin (Acre) 1.1" of Stormwater Runoff Over Impervious Areas CF Filtered Volume Provided 1 1.97 7,866 13,575 2 0.58 2,316 8,721 3 0.38 1,517 12,851 4 0.25 998 317 5 0.91 1 3,634 5,843 Total 4.09 1 16,331 41,307 Table 7 shows a summary of the peak runoff rates for the proposed conditions. Table 8 compares the existing site runoff rates with the proposed site runoff rates. Table 6: Summary of Peak Runoff Rates: Proposed Drainage Areas (Detail 2/C500 Drainage Area No. Time of Concentration (minutes) 24-hour Storm Events Peak Runoff Rates 2-year cfs) 10-year (cfs) 100-year Snow -Melt (cfs 1 5.0 0.99 2.05 4.25 0.24 2 5.0 - - - - 3 5.0 4 5.0 5 5.0 6 5.0 7 5.0 0.54 1.01 1.96 0.11 Filtration Basin 41 0.96 8.03 12.70 1.40 Filtration Basin 42 0.15 0.17 2.85 0.15 Filtration Basin #3 - - - - Filtration Basin #4 - - - - Filtration Basin #5 I.74 7373 18.81 1.19 Total 4.38 18.99 40.57 3.09 Table 7: Comparison of Peak Runoff Rates: Existing vs. Proposed (cfs Condition 2-year/ 24-hr 10-year/ 24-hr 100-year/ 24-hr Snow -Melt 10-day Existing 19.15 33.74 61.89 4.09 Proposed 4.38 18.99 40.57 3.09 SB _a_ SPERIDES REINERS nRCRITPL73,ING March 1711 2017 Transmittal Re: City of Chanhassen Mission Hills Senior Living Submittal Submitted on March 171h 2017 (7) full size and (1) 8.5"xll" of the following (1) digital copy of the proposal on CD 8 I/2" X 11" Originals Application for Development Review Form (with Check for fees) Geotechnical Evaluation Report Proposed HydroCAD Report Existing HydroCAD Report Proposed Lighting Cut Sheets AA, BB, CC, DD, EE, FF Project Narrative Hydrology Calculations MIDS Calculator Results Hydrology Report 30"x42" Sheets A0.0 TITLE SHEET PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE SURVEY C100 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C200 UTILITY PLAN C300 PAVING AND GEOMETRIC PLAN C301 TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT PLAN C400 CIVIL DETAILS SHEET C401 CIVIL DETAILS SHEET C500 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN Al.1 SITE PLAN A1.2 MONUMNET SIGN DETAILS, PATIO GARDEN FENCE DETAILS A1.3 LANDSCAPE PLAN, INSTALLATION DETAILS, PLANTING SCHEDULE A1.4 PLANTING PROFILES, RAIN GARDEN DIAGRAM, ENLARGED PLANS A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.10 CAMPUS VIEWS A3.11 CAMPUS VIEWS A3.20 TOWNHOME VILLA VIEWS AND ELEVATIONS A3.21 TOWNHOME VILLA DESIGN OPTIONS M SITE PHOTOMETRICS Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. Contact Eric Reiners Address: 4200 .Old Shakapee Rd Phone: (952) 996-9662 City/State/Zip: loo ington, MN 55437 Cell: Email: eric@sra-mn.com Fax: (952) 996-9663 Signature: Date: 3/16117 PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC Contact: Michael Hoagberg Address: 17550 Hemlock Avenue Phone: (952) 378-4386 City/State/Zip: Lakeville, MN 55044 Cell: Email: mhoagberg@headwatersdevelopment.biz Fax: Signature: Date: 3116/17 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: BKBM Contact: Keith Matte Address: 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Phone: (763) 843-0464 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55429 Cell: Email: kmatte@bkbm.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: ❑� Property Owner Via: Email ❑r Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑r Mailed Paper Copy Address: ✓❑ Engineer Via: 0 Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other* Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMrr FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing (required). SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMR FORM March 2, 2018 Mr. Michael Hoagberg 17550 Hemlock Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 Dear Mr. Hoagberg: This letter is to formally notify you that on January 22, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motions: Subdivision "The City Council approves the final plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'a Addition, replatting 8.64 Acres into one lot as shown in plans dated received December 22, 2017, subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. Unit Type No. of Units Amount Total Independent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000 Assisted/MemoryCare Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000 Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000 Total $478,000 Engineering Conditions: 1. The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46. This fee is due with the final plat." 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. This plan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator." 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against the property. 4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs. Fire Marshall Condition: Mr. Michael Hoagberg March 2, 2018 Page 2 1. Prior to release of surety for the utilities constructed as part of this project, the developer shall provide hydraulic calculations to verify water availability under fire conditions of the main building. The design shall provide adequate water flow to support two elevated master streams while the main building is experiencing fire conditions. DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT "The City Council approves the development contract for Mission Hills 3' Addition." CONSTRUCTION PLANS "The City Council approves the construction plans dated received January 22, 2018 for Mission Hills 3'd Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. Retaining wall shall not be constructed on top of the stone sewer run from STRM #31 to STRM #32 — Condition Added. 2. The turnaround for the dead-end parking aisles in the main parking lot must be 10 feet by 26 feet. 3. The current plan set shows an approximately 14-foot drop at 90.28%. This elevation drop must be an inside drop, per Chanhassen standard detail plate, within a sanitary manhole structure." 4. The Architect's signature date shall be updated to include a month/day/year format. 5. The electrical site plan shall be certified. 6. The private streets shall be renamed to Aldrich Lane and Aldrich Drive. 7. The low area where Filtration Basins #1 and #2 ultimately discharge on the south end of the site shall be graded and protected to convey the water to the existing 36" stormwater pipe that connects to the MnDOT TH 212 system. The discharge piping from Filtration Basin #2 does not align well with the 36" pipe and the conveyance means need to be further clarified and designed. 8. The grading plan must clearly indicate the location and elevation of the Emergency Over -Flows (EOFs) for the Filtration Basins. 9. The NPDES construction permit must be applied for and granted to the applicant prior to any earth disturbing activities. 10. Stockpile locations shall be determined and shown on the plans. 11. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: Smooth face, poured -in - place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties, and timber. 12. Retaining walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. Mr. Michael Hoagberg March 2, 2018 Page 3 13. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 14. If a retaining wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier is required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 15. The developer's engineer shall submit documentation that the street pavement section meets a 7- ton design. 16. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide with 18 foot long parking spaces. The 24 foot aisle width designed would require 20 foot long parking spaces. 17. Pedestrian ramps shall meet current ADA requirements. 18. All watermain and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained. The utility design must meet the City's requirements for public utilities. 19. The current plan set shows an approximately 14-foot drop at 90.28% at the connection to the existing sanitary sewer stub for the parcel. The design indicates the use of two elbows to adjust the raise the elevation of the sanitary sewer within the site. This elevation adjustment must be created with an inside drop within a sanitary manhole, per the City of Chanhassen standard detail plate. 20. The developer shall remove the existing gate valve on the water service tie-in under 86's St W. 21. Install clean -outs on the sanitary service piping to the twin homes at horizontal bend locations. 22. Install curb stops on each water service pipe to the twin homes. Install riser under a driveway casting similar to the draintile clean -out detail. 23. The plans shall label all of the sump catch basins and the aprons on the plan sheets. 24. Create profile views for all of the trunk storm sewer. The line from Filtration Basin #3 to SSMH #19 is not included. Include pipe crossing elevations to verify required clearance. 25. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. 26. The hook-up fees for the main building are due with the building permit. 27. All work with the MnDOT right-of-way or the Carver County right-of-way shall be approved and permitted by the respective agency. 28. The site shall be compliant with the City of Chanhassen's MS4 permit. 29. The proposed BMPs shall be privately owned. Mr. Michael Hoagberg March 2, 2018 Page 4 30. The infiltrometer testing results for each basin shall be submitted to the City to verify the infiltration rate prior to release of the security for the filtration basins. 31. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project." Attached are a Site Plan Agreement and a Development Contract for you to sign and return with the security and cash fees in order for the documents to be recorded. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 952.227.1134 or e-mail at saljaff(d),ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner Enclosures ec: George Bender, Assistant City Engineer Stephanie Smith, Project Engineer Eric Reiners, Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CITY OF CBANHASSEN Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: March 21, 2017 Agency Review Response Deadline: Aril 6, 2017 Date Application Filed: March 17, 2017 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Sharmeen AI-Jaff 952-227-1134 safaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60-Day Review Period Deadline: April 18, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. May 8, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. May 16, 2017 Application: Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center on 8.64 acres of property zoned Planned Unit Development PUD located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard Outlot E, Mission Hills). PlanningCase: 2017-07 Web Page: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: ❑ Attorney N Building Official N Engineer ® Fire Marshal ® Forester ® Park Director ® Water Resources ❑ Law Enforcement Federal Agencies: ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ US Fish & Wildlife Watershed Districts: ❑ Carver County WMO ❑ Lower MN River ❑ Minnehaha Creek ® Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Carver County Agencies: Utilities: ❑ N Community Development Engineer N Cable TV — Mediacom ❑ Environmental Services N Electric — Minnesota Valley ❑ Historical Society ❑ Electric — Xcel Energy ❑ Parks ❑ Magellan Pipeline ® Soil &Water Conservation District N Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy ® Phone — CenturyLink State Agencies: ❑ Board of Water & Soil Resources ❑ Health ❑ Historical Society ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry N Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control N Transportation Adjacent Cities: ❑ Chaska ❑ Eden Prairie ❑ Jackson Township ❑ Minnetonka ❑ Shorewood ❑ Victoria Adiacent Counties: ❑ Hennepin ❑ Scott School Districts: ❑ Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Minnetonka 276 Other Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ® SouthWest Transit ❑ TC&W Railroad COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 �1 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW G Submittal Date: Z PC Data: J ZI CC Date: 60-Day Review Date: O ISection 1: Application Type (check all that apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ..... $100 ❑✓ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots.......................$600 + $15 per lot ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) �_ lots) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................$325 ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots) .................................. $300 ❑ All Others.........................................................$425 ❑ Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 El Interim Use Permit (IUP) [I Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑� Final Plat .................................. ........................ $700 ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 `Additional escrow may be required for other applications � ❑Rezoning (REZ) through the development contract. ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑✓ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ Administrative..................................................$100 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑� Commercial/Industrial Districts*......................$500 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ( 9- thousand square feet) *Include ElZoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 number of existing employees: Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, .................................... Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( 136 units) the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ❑✓ Notification Sign (City to install and remove)...................................................................................................................... $200 ❑� Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address (114 addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document El Conditional Use Permit El Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements (— easements) TOTAL FEE: $2,962.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Adding Day Care to the inside of the Mission Hills Senior Living Apartment Building Property Address or Location: _ Parcel #: Mission Hills Outlot E Hwy 101 and Hwy 212 Legal Description: Outlot E of the plat of Mission Hills, Carver County, Minnesota Total Acreage: 8•64 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes 0 No Present Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) 0 Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Q Present Land Use Designation: Mixed 0 Requested Land Use Designation: Mixed 0 Existing Use of Property: Undeveloped ❑ Check box is separate narrative is attached. Sidewalk/Trail: The sidewalk/trail shown in the plans will be crossing into an area along MN 101 (Great Plains Blvd) where MnDOT owns access control. MnDOT is in the process of determining if this connection will be allowed using a Limited Use Permit. We expect to have a final determination by the end of the week of April 11-15 and will notify you of the decision at that time. Noise: MnDOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities having the authority to regulate land use shall take all reasonable measures to prevent the establishment of land use activities, listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC), anywhere that the establishment of the land use would result in immediate violations of established State noise standards. MnDOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such developed areas. The project proposer is required to assess the existing noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimise the impact to the proposed development from any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding MnDOT's noise policy please contact Natalie Ries in Metro District's Noise and Air Quality Unit at 651-234-7681 or Natalie.Riesnastate.mn.us. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf. version of the plans. MnDOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us provided that each separate e-mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: MnDOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 3.One (1) compact disc. 4. Plans can also be submitted to MnDOT's External FTP Site. Please send files to: ftp://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/incoming/MetroWatersEdge/Planning Internet Explorer doesn't work MnDCT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 using ftp so please use an FT? Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234-7797. Sincerely, Cameron Muhic Senior Planner Copy sent via E-Mail: Nancy Jacobson, Design Hailu Shekur, Water Resources Julie Johnson, Traffic Clare Lackey, Traffic Engineering Doug Nelson, Right -of -Way Dan Phelps, Right -of -Way Buck Craig, Permits Diane Langenbach, Area Engineer Natalie Ries, Noise Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 SRa, ,. TRANSMITTAL To: Sharmeen AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen. MN 55317 FROM: Eric A. Reiners, AIA PROJECT NAME: Mission Hills Senior Housir PROJECT NO: 14-040 DATE: 3/17/2017 The items below are transmitted 4200 W. Old Shakopee Rd. #220 Bloomington, MN 55437 (952) 996.9662 (952) 996.9663 - fax FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ VIA: MAIL FOR YOUR REVIEW MESSENGER�� FOR YOUR APPROVAL PERSONAL DELIVERY FOR YOUR USE QX PICK-UP FOR YOUR RECORDS UPS- NEXT DAYO AS REQUESTED DESCRIPTION: QTY. DATE REM DESCRIPTION 1 3/17/2017 Transmittal, City Application and Fee payment 7 3/17/2017 Full size drawings and 8-1 /20 x 11" copies of the following: 3/17/2017 Project Narrative 3/17/2017 Geotechnical Evaluation Report 3/17/2017 Updated traffic study 3/17/2017 Proposed Lighting Cut Sheets AA, BB, CC, DD, EE, FF 3/17/2017 Proposed HydroCAD Report 3/17/2017 Existing HydroCAD Report 3/17/2017 Hydrology Calculations 3/17/2017 MIDS Calculator Results 3/17/2017 Hydrology Report 3/17/2017 Architectural site and building plans, site lighting, landscape 3/17/2017 Civil engineering plan, grading, drainage and utilities COMMENTS: CC: Mike Hoagberg & Greg Zoidis - Headwaters Development Susan Farr & Jill Nokleby Kaiser - Ebenezer Jeff Engelsma - Engelsma Construction MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA GONiRK.TOR _ �euMma �nu!cu�w- e�eHmt euave[au � •'.�4�'�i.*ice L=pu Y�M�.gRaJ..W rrtti� � v 2 rii�5il•-- Eff- AO.0 / ,ij r LOT I r � 0EJ�510 � ✓V J aLOC / ,RU;:K HAGMIAV %M/SS/ON HILLS 3ND AMMON C.R.PIATD0 o: •b� Ss, \ '�� .w�..=w r..R' / v./uww..��. a �b � ..�'::Pw"'. � � .�.�—�P'�'s y"e: wxw �` \ �1 Yei iwe�a sxer��a'�iu�nonm nrv's�[ wwn� M.M./Moraµ ,•I �i ���M`s.s w. wF �.n..r brrw !!iC%\ wee 1F �.. nP \ _'wRai Me/+ar_...ua.ebr b++wa. �n_•wrr.i.u..n+bw....ms:, �1.. In b1g�YYY$ e.— ew/�, m.ms„ • (J w saM/s{a.mr. Sj11M P M .E er Y .aY�ya OM �� u Pr snV rT ""`" SSSUNDE \ram It'd- 2 q � III \\\� \\�- • / /~-�__"��___" _~/ Y 1 II /M AYAO OW i.tN—'T RIGHT OF N s��a.unax o.nrs�mnra. JJS �vE-�-r s ® — mx tipow� �.. � b jp !O i b :f IINDO, RIGHT OF y FBGIWAYhb 2ffi �Qp^u05M�EfdL A AC991^- I In CONTROL kla WAY AV 212 ip�vevaa n .w....---gyp m .....---- .MT Ls .A ....w m : -.rjo-- r F:AE N6:E i=R F:93 . nav u'enws�a�vanaomin.wm :me — JIM111MV221 O ,Y,��aCWiiSi'RY9Y•'LbAl�ii� R COD �. Ei'ittdi MR 7-.Y 1 ow�xu mew PAVING AND GEOMETRIC PLAN C300 "M O O GM vso bkbm flretruck feet WIEth : e.30 Track : e Lock to Lod Tone : S.30 Ste"q Angle : 45.7 Pt v > fmf+r+RrRO�rvu TF 0 Po v ELI Lwv m xy1� apes+a¢+'1Ji IIIYi InIfIYWTYiY9 aaown 4 s _'.�F. A RAM +mimes n.+w +v CML DETALS SHEET C400 r Mm ����r�__ mil leeu_vIL_m �Ssst4L iMM Yv �sn�iaruewcaxr JL m. x �r._.0.�'TI'u. � JL w MW a� ;�1 $n4+ e. h� 1 r i'+ W K.M I � fl. 11! rr — It �11� SSA ; T 1 tq.I,i i IS' A 44 IA. , i A ,tom I��E+ai'av r I r � Im:�u I �; ,I A+ 41'.�ikkLtt �{, ' vpf r -T ,n A CIVIL DEALS SHEEP C401 m®G�1l+yiF�d-11r�' IFeca� 000 ®m a•=a oom LL^JmO��'a'� 0o0®©om NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP m �. ..» W. z m®��N-�IY�ri3ire-1O o©0oeeae® ooLLL©®eaee� OLLLLVLLL©LLLL'eeee® oo©ooeoe® Lo©ooasoe® oomomom®m e�eeemol©om �eoem©om® ®LLseeeeaLLs� ®LLseoeoeoc� ®eoo©®om® -I N A tl PREVENTION PLAN 24` ►i M m 7AUNK hfGHWA FIIBDION HILLS SENIOR LIMNS 61tE PLAN N]AY �tAINING WALL DETAIL 3 FLAGPOLE BASE 9EGtION 89M,. AN rc,T NorEe. ®_r ®� A ®rnrwn_ 5 INreleuncHAL errreoL cf occEeelelurr 4 DOLLA 6 MANDIOAP PdRC BIGNAGE � MEMORY CARE PATIO FENCE COLIfNB ---------- -- -1--c -- ------------- T -- ------ ----- -- ---------- - L--j 1--L ----------- L--A � MEMORY CARE PATIO FENCE AND COLIFN ELEVATIONS hm, A1.2 H dN CNB' ww..Mu�sa.w�r eis i.ee.�..r..n.wry �S�ZL9GRS".Si. ItliIG TmN ms: a� .rsn v MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVMG 61TE RdNED •MT.WAI,CN CEfMS •%/.Nf 50VAAE A1.3 e• i �' �ilia 111-1w Mr � u..y L a_.r� �— r �w �I¢ � �t 0 fill", ix-�� �1.ii�r��y� VI lop — 1 541 All z N otv�nons Ra®w% A3.2 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. �/ (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefg"klmnopgrstuvwxyz (::J Laurie A. Hartrnann Subscribed and swom before me on thidL!�day ofj.7tCrr.�2017 Ajf'� fJYF,IUE JEANNETTE BARK gt)v Nr) A 'PUB' C M�NNESOTA N blic !,YCOMMSSIONEXP;RESOMIP18 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.59 per column inch CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 622 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OFCHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by amending the Mission Hills Planned Unit Development Design Standards in its entirety as follows: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the commercial development shall comply with the Neighborhood Business District, BN. Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition shall comply with the R-12, High Density District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: • Single Family Residential • Medium Density Residential • High Density Residential with a Child Daycare Center C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of-way The High Density parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of-way and/ or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the High Density portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Cemmnciel Residential ResiAmuel C® Seed HighDway d Resin Peking Pekeg Build'm Sdbeck• B 6ctbeck S Se6rl• Hi 101 50' m' M' — 212 50• m• wev sties m• m• o•cs®m®dei.b ores®memmno Id WL'mes so' 6�,eeiAmuel o. 0. 35• r midmasl • Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-W5 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 9th Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, loth Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, llth Supplemental filed May 7,1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 6, 12th Supplemental filed May 20,1996; Mission Hills 2nd Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Mission Hills 3rd Addition: Area: 376,353.4 square feet Width: 480 feet Depth: 620 feet Net LI4 Berl8ewm BLOCK USE Dewy 152 Maki.Famay Mn iw HUI 3i° U&WCWWD,. 8.64. 173 50% Addition Cdvm Bock 1. Mim. Hills 138 MW F.ly Is. 7.66 37% Wits Block 4, Rfissim Kids M Mult-FaWty Units 9.92 acme 628 432% RESIDENTIAL 1. Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have aminimum of oneoverstorytreewithnn. its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street 6. The apartment building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition shall: a. Have pronounced entrance. b. insure thatallfoundation walls are screened bylandsceping or retaining walls. 1 '7- o--7- c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can he viewed by the public have received equal attention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each of the site planreviewprown. Berms of 2 to 3f"eetmgh shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/ or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2% inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wirg wall may be required where deemed appropriate: 4. The Outlet shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f. Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be permitted for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition. 1. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the buildingmaterials to be consistentwith the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 6. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL. One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height g. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Sid Addition shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of May, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, September 21, 2017' No 4507) i-�-- o�- Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Campion. Any further discussion? Resolution #2017-31: Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council adopts the attached resolution vacating a portion of the drainage and utility easement on 7500 Chanhassen Road as described on the attached Exhibit. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Congratulations Tracey and Chris. Enjoy your new home. Chris Rust: Thank you very much. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor I just want to thank the Rust's. It's not a simple process when you live in existing home and you want to tear it down and build a new one so they were great to work with and appreciate your patience and working through the system. We don't usually get that and thank you. Tracey Rust: Thank you. Chris Rust: Thank you. APPROVAL OF MISSION HILLS SENIOR HOUSING PUD AMENDMENT, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY PLAT; ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING LIMITED USE PERMIT. Mayor Laufenburger: I bet this is your's Kate. Kate Aanenson: Yes it is. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright Ms. Aanenson, staff report please. Kate Aanenson: Yes, thank you Mayor, members of the City Council. This item did appear before the Planning Commission on April 18t° and there was unanimous approval of it so this is an application for Mission Hills Senior Living. A little bit different than what you saw before and I'll go through the history here briefly. The site is located on 8600 Great Plains Boulevard. The background on this is that as part of the original Mission Hills which had a number of different densities or different uses on there, guiding. This was kind of an older district that we had. It was a mixed use so in that there was low density. Medium density and also commercial. The commercial piece was given, and they wanted to stay, have that piece stay there and that was actually put in place before 212 was built and once 212 got built that piece across the street where the Kwik Trip is and the Kraus -Anderson property actually made that site more advantageous for commercial use. Over time we had tried to work with the Klingelhutz family 11 SCANNED Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 looking at, MnDOT was reluctant to give a right turn in and some of those turn movements for commercial were problematic so we worked looking at some other alternative uses for this site and because there is additional density we felt that the senior housing project was a good project. So as that moved through the process there was, you can look at the density as how many units could be on the site based on the acreage so in that circumstances there could be up to 246 and a project was approved under the 210 actual number of units so that was the project that was approved so just strictly senior housing that was what we considered service enriched so you could go through the cycle there and also some townhouses that were also a part of that project. That project was approved a number of years ago and sat for a while. I just want again review the land use there so the subject property, you can see is the commercial piece which also does allow the residential and again that mixed use development is what the underlying land use is so it is consistent with the land use and also the zoning. So this project is a little complex in the fact that it does fall within the shoreland district so a part of the property to the north ended up with the townhouse project which, to keep the 50 percent open space within the shoreland district and also staying within the height regulations of the shoreland district which is the 35 feet. So the four story building ends up on the south side of the site. Mayor Laufenburger: Outside of the water? Kate Aanenson: Correct, outside of the watershed so this here is now the senior housing. The change here then is they actually put in a daycare on the site so the project changed slightly in the fact that now a daycare is introduced to the site and they will still enter off of 86`h Street and then come down. It will be one way traffic controlled here and for the daycare on this side of the building and so it's intergenerational. At the Planning Commission the testimony there was very supportive of having intergenerational there. The senior housing and the daycare and feel really good about that. One of the buffer, the concerns was the buffering here so I think they worked hard to manage that separation there and the change in grade. So again we talked about access coming off of 86th. This is one of the issues that was addressed before with the project. 86' Street and the restricted lane here. So with additional turn movements coming here out on West 86`s Street and a left turn at this intersection can be problematic at certain peak times. MnDOT and the County are aware of those issues and will be monitoring that if there needs to be any changes in place but as of right now the traffic study does show that it will work and I'll let the City Engineer, if he wants to add a few comments there regarding traffic in itself. Paul Oehme: So thanks Ms. Aanenson, members of council. So yeah SRF did complete a traffic study in conjunction with the development. We did have meetings with MnDOT and Carver County. We looked at several options. A signal is not warranted at this location. It's a T intersection and the traffic generated from the existing site and the new site just did not meet that warrant for a new signal. By putting in a signal without meeting warrants it can actually decrease the level of safety at the intersections over time as well too so we are, looked at several options. Adding some islands and some other features. Redoing the median on 101 but at this time the best option we think is just to monitor it and see how much traffic in the a.m. and the p.m. and we'll make some changes down the road if necessary. 12 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Kate Aanenson: So I was just going to add then too for the daycare itself will have 90 children and then approximately 8,600 square feet. So we want to make sure there's connectivity so one of the things would be the continuation of the sidewalk and then also the, we needed a limited use permits from MnDOT for this trail connection through here so that's one of your motions tonight to be included in that. And then to accommodate the daycare one of the twinhomes, the rental twinhomes was eliminated so that would be the significant changes in the project itself. Again the architecture is similar to what we had seen before. Highly enhanced. It matches what's in the neighborhood. Real articulated so staff and the Planning Commission was very supportive of that. Material sample. Again showing the twinhomes. Again blending with the architecture of the senior project itself and the daycare. There will be a sign. This sign is located on 101 so the sign will be senior living. The daycare can also is permitted to have a sign so they could have one on their project also but the sign will, as you can see on the right here where that will be located. Parks, that was an issue that was brought up before. Is there adequate parks in the area? There is open space on the site as I mentioned earlier. There's a sidewalk for connectivity in that area. There's also, you can connect to the trail that was put in with a recent Knoblauch subdivision if you wanted to head to the east to get back around Rice Lake Marsh too. So I mentioned the limited use permit and that was in order to get the trail onto 101 so there's the other part of the connectivity so that's one of the motions included in your packet. So this is also a plat included in this. This is an outlot so we are platting this lot to allow for this project. So again there's 4 motions for you. The resolution for the limited use permit, the preliminary plat, the site plan approval and the PUD. With that I'd be happy to answer any questions that you might have. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Ms. Aanenson. Any questions of staff from council? Councilwoman Ryan, questions? Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. Can you explain the limited use permit for the trail please? Kate Aanenson: It's MnDOT's right-of-way and so the description there just limits how you can use that and if they need to get in there and address it. Paul Oehme: Right so we'll have ownership of the trail within the right-of-way. They just allow for that use and they want to just make sure that we're maintaining it so, down the road we might have to update the limited use of that document but it's just basically for future maintenance to make sure that it's in good condition. Councilwoman Ryan: So it's basically saying that Chanhassen will maintain the trail, that's what. Paul Oehme: Within the right-of-way. Councilwoman Ryan: Within the right-of-way. 13 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Paul Oehme: Yeah so MnDOT doesn't give limited use permits to developers to they have to work through the City for that. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Okay, thank you. Kate Aanenson: And to be clear it's for trail purposes, yeah. Councilwoman Ryan: Right, okay. And then you mentioned something about the, a twin home being removed. Kate Aanenson: Yeah so there was originally with the project there was 9 so now they're down to the 8 and that was to accommodate the parking. Additional parking required with the daycare and better circulation through the site. One way circulation for drop off. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And then in terms of the daycare is that, just out of curiosity, is that then independently owned or does that? Kate Aanenson: I'll let the applicant answer that question if you wouldn't mind. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Kate Aanenson: If they partner with somebody or. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. We'll get to that. And then I do, if I may ask another question. I am concerned about the traffic issue. I know it came up in the meeting when we discussed this before and I understand that it's going to be monitored by Carver County and you know watch it. A couple concerns that I have is first in reading some of the information the Mission Hills Garden Homeowners Association said that they had sent two requests. I'm assuming you've met with them and discussed this. They've been involved in the conversation about it. And some of their suggestions were about doing something with the median or breaking it down or having a better, just some of the vantage point I guess or views with the speed coming north on 101. People coming from the light. Picking up speed and then making that left turn lane off of 86`s onto 101 is concerning. Paul Oehme: Right so one of the improvements that the developer would be making with this project is to eliminate a portion of the median that's currently out there. Todd Gerhardt: On 86's. Paul Oehme: On 86a' Street to restripe it correct. Right so that's an improvement that's going to be made here. Just a little bit more visibility. Taking some of the vegetation out of the median and allowing for better sight distances. 14 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Kate Aanenson: So I think it also allows for the free left and the free right so, and then there. Councilwoman Ryan: So there's no back up on 800 Kate Aanenson: Help reduce the back up, the stacking yeah. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And when Carver County says that they're going to monitor the situation on 101, I mean is it just are we waiting for so many accidents until something's done or just knowing that it's a senior housing it's a fast road on 101. I know it doesn't constitute a full light, a signal but can you do flashing lights? Is there anything to just make people aware of that intersection? Paul Oehme: For this, it's kind of a difficult intersection to make substantial improvements to for traffic flow. Like I had mentioned before we did look at a splitter island at this intersection and would basically would mean that reducing the center median. Having that as, if you're going southbound on 101 kind of a stacking area here and little bit better safety location in the median here when people pull out and go southbound onto 101. We're a little bit hesitant to take that to the next step and just because of some of the conflicts that potentially could happen at the intersection. We did look at like I said we looked at signals. We looked at other traffic safety devices as well. Nothing really, and additional striping too. Nothing really jumped out at us as a significant improvement from currently what's out there today. There is left turn lanes on southbound 101 to get into, onto 86`s Street and there are stacking lanes on 86's Street for left and right turn lanes so it is a wide intersection. Four lanes on Highway 101. I think that's what causes most of the problems. You know to decrease the width of 101 is really problematic just because of the volumes of traffic that go through the intersection so you know it's a tough, tough location to really make any significant improvements. You know we looked at roundabouts too there. There isn't warrants for that. That's not in the cards right now either so like I said Carver County's going to be monitoring. The City will be monitoring as well. We'll take traffic counts and work with Carver County on traffic counts on 101 too and ever so often we do traffic counts on 86d' Street as well too so we'll hear from neighbors as well. We'll monitor those and take that into consideration too so that's kind of the process and the path that we are proposing to move forward with. Councilwoman Ryan: And when you did the traffic study and looked at this area what do they anticipate most of the turn movements being? Is the volume higher going, making a right or is it going left to get onto 212? Paul Oehme: Most of the turning movements are still that left hand movement going southbound on 101. Let me see if I can pull it up here. Yeah so it's in the future they're looking at 79 left turns onto 101 and then on northbound it's about 64 trips during the peak hour. And that's the a.m. and then the p.m.'s a little bit less than that but I guess there is a little bit more on the left hand turns but the right hand turns are pretty high as well. 15 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Councilwoman Ryan: Okay I'll hold for now, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Just related to that Mr. Oehme, when this development first began, when Mission Hills first developed as residential, this property was it originally zoned as commercial? Kate Aanenson: Yeah it was mixed use so commercial. We had a number of offices look at that and the peak demand at offices were significantly worst because you had more trips coming in at the same time. Mayor Laufenburger: That was my question. Kate Aanenson: Yep so, so staff felt like as far as a developable parcel this was really the best possible solution. Mayor Laufenburger: So what you're saying in, what I'm hearing you say is that when this entire development first began and the road construction, not only 86' Street but what's the road just north of there? Where there's a right turn only. Kate Aanenson: Marsh Glen. Mayor Laufenburger: Marsh Glen, is that what it is? So when this development was originally planned and approved the anticipated traffic from this property, though it was vacant at the time, the anticipated traffic was greater than what you're calculating it will be with the senior living and the daycare, am I saying that correctly? Kate Aanenson: That's correct, yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so I'm with Councilmember Ryan on one thing and that is the monitoring. Can you give us an example Mr. Oehme of what would, what sort of actions or what sort of incidents would prompt the City and the County to take action of some sort beyond what it is right now? Beyond removing some of the median on 86`s. Can you give us an example? Paul Oehme: Sure. So traffic flow is obviously one of them. We look at say the level of service for the intersection. That's how the intersection performs. How much wait time you're going to get. You're going to look at, at an intersection on each of the legs so we look at that. We hear from property owners. Complaints. You know it's backing up, way backing up into say the next intersection and I've got a lot of wait time. You know people are making unwise choices running through the intersection at times so we hear from the public on those type of things. Like I said Carver County does take traffic counts on 1011 think every 2 years so we'll know, we'll look at volumes of traffic on 101 to see if they're increasing. How does that correlate to W Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 the traffic on 861 Street. Those type of things. So just a lot of different things that we'll be looking at in the future. Mayor Laufenburger: But specifically you identified 79 left turns in a peak off of 86's onto southbound 101. Is that what you said? Paul Oehme: Correct, yep 79. Mayor Laufenburger: And 64 north turns northbound. Paul Oehme: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And obviously people in the neighborhood if they detect that there are more cars that are stacking up to turn left they would probably go to that Marsh Glen exit to get their right turn. Paul Oehme: They have that option. Mayor Laufenburger: They have that option, okay. So abight. Todd Gerhardt: Paul are those movements within an hour or 2 hour range? Paul Oehme: So those movements are the peak hours so it's typically from 8:00 to 9:00 during the day and then we also look at the p.m. peak hours as well so, and the traffic study too, the level of service at the intersection right now is a level B which is fairly good. We try to keep it about a C and with the new development the projections are to remain at a level B so we're going to be looking at that and seeing if the projections in here are made in the future if the development were to move forward. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilmember Campion, did you have a question or comment? Councilman Campion: Yeah I just have one follow up question for Mr. Oehme. In a situation like this where there isn't a good solution for the left hand turn it looks like to increase the safety much is it, would you consider making it right turn only? Paul Oehme: Yeah we looked at that too. A right-in/right-out or something like that. We've, it's kind of a balancing act. If you make a right-in/right-out or reduce or a three-quarter access you're limiting the mobility of that neighborhood and it's, that's not a, you know if it's not warranted you know we don't want to put hardships on the neighbors as well either so it's kind of a balancing act in terms of safety and mobility so at this time we're not, we wouldn't propose that but again that's something if, you know if the intersection were to degrade over time substantially that would be another tool that we would look at but at this time we're not proposing that. 17 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Councilman Campion: Yeah I mean just looking at elongating the left turns stacking I mean doesn't seem with the amount of additional cars that are being added to the neighborhood, it's hard to imagine that problem getting any better. Mayor Laufenburger: Did you have another? Councilman Campion: No that's it. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Oehme and Kate, are there any other residential developments planned back in this area? I know we had Mr. Knoblauch. Is there anything else that would add more? Kate Aanenson: No. Let me just go back to that kind of the overview of that, of this area. So if we go out to Mission Hills Lane, I think the challenge would be if everybody went up this way that would be the end on people on Tigua and the end of Knob, this development. Knob Hill? No. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Knob, is that Mister? Kate Aanenson: Is Mr. Knoblauch's but anyway you're pushing that up to a low density which is this is a right out only on that intersection so that goes to what Mr. Oehme was speaking about. It presents some other challenges because all the townhouse projects here. The higher density here. Mayor Laufenburger: But there's no further residential development to the east? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. That's correct. It would be fully developed. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, Alright. Anybody else questions? Councilwoman Ryan: I have one more. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilmember Ryan, go ahead. Councilwoman Ryan: When they redid the road on 101, or redid 101 and they changed it to a right only out of Mission Hills, was that for safety reasons? Paul Oehme: It wasn't for safety as I recall. It's more mobility. It's just another access. Before 86' Street was one long dead end. A big cul-de-sac so it doesn't meet with our code. It was you know it was more for a safety perspective you want to have at least more than one access point for this size of a development so it was more of a mobility and safety consideration that that access was installed, or connected to 101. Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Councilwoman Ryan: Because I mean before they put the median in they were able to make the left turn out of there before the road was redone, correct? Or was it never, were you never able to go left? Kate Aanenson: I don't think it was there because Mission Hills subdivision, I'm not sure on that. Mayor Laufenburger: I'm not understanding your question Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: I thought at one point they were able to make a both left and right turn out of Mission Hills and then. Mayor Laufenburger: Out of Mission Hills from 86h? Todd Gerhardt: She's right, it was a 2 lane highway 101. It didn't have a median. Councilwoman Ryan: And so if you go, if you look up, if it's north over Mission Hills before they redid 101 Mission Hills could come out and they could make either a left or a right turn. Mayor Laufenburger: But that's when the road was occupying the corridor that is currently Waters Edge Drive, am I correct on that? Kate Aanenson: The old 101. Mayor Laufenburger: The divided two highway, or the divided highway of 101 supplanted Waters Edge Drive as 101. Todd Gerhardt: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So it was two lane. Dangerous as can be. Todd Gerhardt: As you came out of Mission Hills Lane you could make a left or a right. After the reconstruction of 101 into a 4 lane it was decided that the full intersection would be concentrated at 86t' Street. So anybody wanting to make a left hand turn in the Mission Hills development would have to go to 86 h Street to do that. So before it was just a 2 lane highway. Councilwoman Ryan: I mean my point being that now we're, even though a 2 lane highway might be unsafe I think crossing 2 lanes of traffic that are gaining speed into, you know to head south, to not have some sort of a safe lane for people to turn into is concerning to me especially noting that it's senior housing and it just is concerning to me. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there not a left turn lane in 101 south? Right at 86a' Street. 19 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Paul Oehme: There is a left turn lane. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah Kate showed it on the map. There's a left and a right. Councilwoman Ryan: But a left safe like to turn onto 101. Paul Oehme: Right, yeah. So there's the left turn there. Councilman Campion: You have to get on and get up to speed right away. Paul Oehme: Yeah so. Councilwoman Ryan: There's no like receiving lane. Mayor Laufenburger: Acceleration lane. Councilwoman Ryan: Right. Paul Oehme: Right. Councilwoman Ryan: Some sort of a receiving lane next to the median to get across and then accelerate onto 101 because you know you're trying to cut across traffic that's headed north and you're trying to head south. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Oehme what, what traffic incidents have you, have been reported at that location? Paul Oehme: I know when the traffic study they looked at that. I don't have that right in front of me right now but as I recall it wasn't in the high severity crash intersection so in, that's one of the items that we look at when evaluating intersections for warrants. For a signal so it didn't rise to that threshold either. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Paul Oehme: To Mrs. Ryan's point we did look at decreasing the size of the median at this location here and having an acceleration lane for southbound traffic. The problem is that at the intersection you have to put another median at this location for safety purposes and we were just a little concerned at this time about the traffic crossing at that location and some conflicts that potentially could happen there so you know we're, staff is more than willing to look at that a little bit harder and see if we need to, if there's another option out there that we can have an acceleration lane going southbound in a safe zone basically so you can pull out. You know 20 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 crossing the two northbound lanes and then having a safe area there to accelerate to the south so we can look at that option again. Todd Gerhardt: Paul isn't the safety zone where your red dot is? There's plenty of room for 1 to 2 cars right there before they make the left hand turn. Paul Oehme: There's I would say maybe one car. The problem is that. Todd Gerhardt: Going to pass around Google Maps and you can take a look. Councilwoman Ryan: Dan has it on. Paul Oehme: But the problem is, yeah there's no acceleration area. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah there's plenty of room for 2 cars there because there are cars on the road. You know the other point is anybody that if you close that intersection off is one option. Then people arc going to go down to the apartments and St. Hubert's and make a U turn to go south. Councilwoman Ryan: Right. And I'm not suggesting closing it off. I think it's important to have the access to make both the left and the right hand turn lane. I disagree that there is room there to get across and accelerate onto southbound 101. I mean I think it's still tight. Todd Gerhardt: No I wouldn't, I'm not saying accelerate. I'm saying waiting until the cars are through then go. Paul Oehme: You know we've observed that cars do, you know one car or so can stop right here and then wait for traffic on southbound 101 and then go after that but it's not a very safe movement I would say because anybody that's heading southbound and want to make that left there might be a conflict that they run into so it depends on where the car is so. So we'll, staff is more than willing to look at that option again and see if we can come up with a better solution. Councilwoman Ryan: I would prefer that you did just to take a harder look at what the possibilities are for more of a safe zone or an acceleration lane. My concern is that waiting for 2 years to do another traffic study it's, I think it's easier to get something done while the project is underway versus waiting to see what happens and the what happens situation is not a good you know what if so. Paul Oehme: Okay. Councilwoman Ryan: I'd appreciate that. Thank you. 21 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Mayor Laufenburger: Any other questions or comments? Kate can you just clarify for me in it's simplest form, so this project came before the council previously and we gave it an approval, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: So the significant changes are number one, you're adding the limited use trail. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: You're taking away a twin home. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And you're adding a daycare. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: So those are the 3 primary things right? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And the daycare you identified 8,600 square feet. Is that a repurposing of 8,600 square feet or is it an adding of an additional 8,600 square feet. Kate Aanenson: They still have the same number of units. I'll let them speak to that a little bit more about who their vendor is and how that will be operated. They are here tonight. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, that might be a good segue. I wonder if the applicant would like to speak at this time. And answer any questions we may have. Simply just identify yourself, your organization. Mike Hoagberg: Hi I'm Mike Hoagberg with Headwaters Development. We're out of Lakeville, Minnesota. Thank you for your time- tonight and there's a lot of good questions and things that we've been struggling with a little bit on this development but what we think is a little more exciting is some of the things that we added to this. We think we enhanced the project over time. We understand that it's taken a little while to get to this point but with working with our operator Ebenezer we've spent a lot of time thinking about is there a better enhanced use than just the senior component and what kept coming to the surface was this daycare component. Intergenerational is a big push. We've seen a lot of great success in previous Ebenezer projects and we think this location and in the city of Chanhassen is a fantastic opportunity. We look at taking that energy of those children and putting them with the seniors and the wisdom and 22 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 friendship that they can provide and making sure that that's all very cohesive throughout the building is important and we've seen a lot of great success, not only from the seniors but also with the children and so we're excited to add that component. As we mentioned we did lose one of the twin homes but we think that improved the circulation throughout the site and allows for the pick up and drop off to be more efficient. And to answer a couple specific questions that you had, we did repurpose part of the square footage so it is the same number of units but we felt that it's important to have the actual daycare center in the main building and so on the, let's see here, it'd be the east. The fast floor on the east side of the building. The front there is where the 8,600 square feet is. There's a separate entrance for the drop off and pick up. It's a secured entrance for the children. And then inside the center of the building will be a secured walkway where the children can come in to meet with the seniors and their community and the seniors can come into the daycare center. It is owned by our same ownership group. Ebenezer will be operating both the senior care component as well as the child care. They have a lot of experience doing that. They have their own specific dedicated staff to children and licensing and operating. I think that addressed those questions. Mayor Laufenburger: It did. Mike Hoagberg: And then the traffic study. We've done a couple of them to look at the different uses that we proposed for the site and we've struggled with it too. We think that this is a fairly busy intersection. I've been out there on several occasions trying different times of the day and some of them are more difficult, especially when the light changes at night or early in the morning or during those peak hours. From a senior component, one it's a little less usage. There's certain residents in there that aren't driving so that is reflected in the study but more importantly there's a lot of the senior driving component is off peak hours. It's not during the rush hours. We do have staff that will be coming in and out during those rush hours but it's typically not necessarily the resident. We do want to make a commitment. We understand it's a little difficult because it's part of the County has the decision on the roads and not necessarily the City but we want to commit that we want to work with you guys to figure this out because we do think it's a problem that needs a solution. I don't know what that is yet. We're talking about a lot of different options here and I agree. I think we should be more proactive on trying to figure out whether you know it's a stop light or a roundabout or whatever might be the best solution. I think we can collectively work together to figure that out. Mayor Laufenburger: Good, alright. Would you just stand for questions. Any questions of the applicant? Thank you for answering that repurposing question. Thank you Michael. Mike Hoagberg: Alright thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Look forward to having you in the community. Alright let's bring it back. Kate can you just put up that resolution one more time? So just restate for us the four elements of this motion. 23 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Kate Aanenson: One would be approving the PUD which specifies the twinhomes, the daycare, and the senior housing. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: A site plan approval so we showed you the architecture and the numbers of units. The preliminary plat. We're taking an outlot and creating a lot with the extractions that go with that and then a resolution for the limited use for the trail on MnDOT's property and then adoption of Findings of Fact. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And you called this a site plan approval and a preliminary plat. Is there, will this come back to the council for a final plat or not? Kate Aanenson: I don't believe so. Mayor Laufenburger: So once we approve this then we're essentially giving, we're giving permission for the developer to move forward exactly as they've identified? Kate Aanenson: Yes. I believe all the conditions are in for engineering that they need for the plat. Todd Gerhardt: Preliminary and final? Kate Aanenson: It's only noticed for preliminary on here so it may have to come back for just the final. Todd Gerhardt: Yep. Kate Aanenson: Yep so it would come back for just for the final plat, yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright let's bring it back to the council. Any further discussion? Discussion, comment or motion. Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Councilmember Ryan, yep. Councilwoman Ryan: So with that, with this motion and the question in terms of traffic and looking at it, where does that leave us because in, you know and you've been hearing the conversation. When you talk about a daycare obviously that's daily in and out by parents dropping their children off so, and thinking that they might then drop their children off and want to hop onto 212 to get into downtown so that's that left turn lane. So where does approving this motion leave the looking into the traffic and doing something on 101? 24 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Mayor Laufenburger: Kate are there, is traffic study part of the Findings of Fact? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Mr. Gerhardt did you want to give us any counsel on this? Todd Gerhardt: Mayor and council, if you want to make that as part of your motion to direct staff to look at alternative acceleration lanes on Market Boulevard to go south and you know bring that back as a feasibility study for your consideration we could do that. Mayor Laufenburger: But that direction is not, is that direction specifically needed to call this out? We've already heard Mr. Oehme say that he plans to work with the County to monitor activities there. Historically what has the council done historically in your experience here? Todd Gerhardt: Well historically the council's probably done both and if you still have your Google Maps and you move up to Market Boulevard and Lake Drive there's, which is I would say a busier intersection by Bookoo Bikes and Summerwood and there's no acceleration lane going south. There is a small acceleration lane going north and. Mayor Laufenburger: Right turn out of Summerwood onto north 101? Todd Gerhardt: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Is that what you're referring to? Todd Gerhardt: Yes. There is an acceleration, small acceleration going north but as you come out of the Summerwood, Bookoo Bikes area you have a choice of two lanes. Well really the inside lane. There's no acceleration lane. There's a median and then the two thru lanes that go to the south. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Oehme let's go back to 86`s Street. Have you examined closely the sight lines? Are there any obstructions of sight lines such as any shrubbery or tall grasses in any direction? Paul Oehme: The 86 b Street? No the vegetation in the median is far enough back from the intersection where I don't think there's any sight lines on 101. Mayor Laufenburger: You're talking about the median on 809 Paul Oehme: On 86`s Street yeah, and then likewise on 101. Mayor Laufenburger: And isn't there, there is a path on the east side of 101 all the way right? 25 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Paul Oehme: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Or trail I guess you would call it. Paul Oehme: Trail, yeah. So there really isn't any sight lines or vegetation issues at this intersection to obstruct visibility. Todd Gerhardt: Is there a left turn acceleration lane onto a four lane highway? Has that ever been designed? Paul Oehme: There's a few that are out there. Todd Gerhardt: Are there? Paul Oehme: Yeah. Todd Gerhardt: I just haven't seen too many. Usually you kind of stop in the middle and then you go when there's an opening. Paul Oehme: Right. The problem is that it works better if there's a larger median. When you have a smaller median it's a little bit more difficult to have any vehicles there. Like on say Highway 7, I think that median's a little wider so if there's cars that are crossing say Highway 7 there's more stacking at those type of facilities than there are... Todd Gerhardt: But those at controlled intersections. Paul Oehme: No there's a couple out there that, I'm specifically thinking about one on Highway 7 in Excelsior there's a median there that I think you can stack at least 2 cars there. Todd Gerhardt: Okay. Paul Oehme: This one's a little bit narrower so it's a little harder to stack cars in the median. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, Councilmember Ryan I would say that based on Mr. Gerhardt's comments that this sometimes the staff or sometimes the staff is directed. Sometimes they're not. For my perspective and I guess I would like to hear from other council members, I think they got the message that the concern. Mr. Hoagberg mentioned. You've mentioned it. It's been reinforced by council and others that it needs to be watched. If there's something specific that we would like them to come back with, a recommendation I don't know if they're equipped to do that until, well no I think they could be equipped to do that. Come back with a recommendation. If you'd like to make that a part of the language of the motion or does it have to be part of the motion or we can just direct staff? 26 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Todd Gerhardt: Just direct us. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright so I would say you're welcome to make your statement on what you would like to see the staff come back with. Giving them some, and make it independent of this motion I would say. Are you comfortable with that? Councilwoman Ryan: Sure. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So state what you would like to see staff. Councilwoman Ryan: I would like staff to look at the option of either an acceleration lane headed south on Great Plains or the median on the south side of the intersection looks a little bit thicker than on the north side and maybe there would be space to do something there so if we could just look at an option for a safe zone or somewhere for people to turn into I'd appreciate it. Mayor Laufenburger: Including options, feasibility and costs? Paul Oehme: Absolutely we can put all that together. We have something similar to that already drawn up so. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Paul Oehme: So it won't be hard to put some numbers together. Mayor Laufenburger: And if you don't mind I think it'd be worthwhile for us to bring that back in a work session so we can talk in greater detail. Less formally about that. Are you okay with that? Councilwoman Ryan: That would be great. PaulOehme: Absolutely. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Any other discussion, comment or motion? Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor I'll make a motion. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: I think it's a great project. I'd like to propose that the City Council approves a planned unit development amendment to the existing standards, Mission Hills PUD. 27 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 A site plan approval for the construction of a 136 unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building, 8 twin homes, 16 independent living units, and a daycare center, and a preliminary plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition. And resolution approving a Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for a trail connection on property zoned planned unit development PUD and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard, Outlot E, Mission Hills, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Councilmember Ryan. We have a motion. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Campion. Any further discussion on this motion? Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Mission Hills to allow High Density Use with a Childcare Center on the site and set standards for the structures as shown below with the following conditions, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact: 1. The site must comply with the DNR Shoreland Rules 2. The site shall comply with the following standards: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the commercial development shall comply with the Neighborhood Business District, BN. Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition shall comply with the R-12, High Density District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: • Single Family Residential • Medium Density Residential Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 • High Density Residential with a Child Daycare Center C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The High Density parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of-way and/ or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the High Density portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Commercial Residential Residential Commercial Street High Density Medium Density Parking Parking Building Setback* Building Setback Setback Setback* Highway 101 * 50' 20' Highway 212 * 50' 20' West 86`h Street * 30' 20' Interior Lot Lines O'(from commercial) 01 01 1 0' (from commercial) 50'(from residential) 35' (from residential) * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 9's Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 10'b Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 1 I'b Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12's Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; Mission Hills 2°d Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Mission Hills 3'd Addition: Area: 376,358.4 square feet Width: 480 feet Depth: 620 feet Net Lot Hard Surface BLOCK USE Density Area Coverage 29 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Mission Hills Yd 152 Multi -Family Units/Child Daycare 8.64 acres 17.5 50% Addition Center Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi -Family 18 acres 7.66 37% Units Block 4, Mission Hills i 56 Multi -Family Units 8.92 acres 6.28 43.2% RESIDENTIAL 1. Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. 6. The apartment building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition shall: a. Have pronounced entrance. b. Insure that all foundation walls are screened by landscaping or retaining walls. c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. 30 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2'/2 inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f, Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be permitted for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition. 1. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within Lot I, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 31 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. g. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3d Addition shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, and subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. Unit Type No. of Units Amount Total Independent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000 Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000 Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000 Total $478,000 32 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 Engineering Conditions: 1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69. These shall be due with the final plat. 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance manual that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against the property. 4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the BMPs. Planning Conditions: 1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment and Site Plan application. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 136-unit senior housing apartment with a childcare center and eight twin homes, Planning Case 2017-07 as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, and subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resource Conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for approval. The revised plan shall meet minimum bufferyard requirements. 2. Additional planting may be required along the southern half of the east property line. 3. Park grade trees are not acceptable quality and will not meet landscape standards for the City of Chanhassen. Item # 12 of the General Notes shall be deleted. 4. The applicant shall consider locating landscaping along the rain garden near the comer of 86t° St W and 101 to block headlight glare from turning vehicles. Building Official Conditions: 1. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. A "Code Record" is required (Code Record schematic plans may be same scale as architectural). For "Code Record" information go to MN Dept. of Labor and Industry: ho://www.dli.mn.eov/CCLD/PlanConstruction.aM 33 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 2. Buildings must be protected with automatic fire suppression systems. As required by Minnesota State Building Code and /or Minnesota State Residential Code. 3. An accessible route must be provided to all buildings, parking facilities, public transportation stops and common use facilities. 4. Parking areas, including parking garages, must be provided with accessible parking spaces dispersed among the various parking areas and building entrances. 5. Accessible dwelling units must be provided in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. 6. The building owner and/or their representatives should meet with the Inspections Division to discuss plan review and permit procedures (in particular, type of construction and allowable area issues must be addressed). Fire Marshal Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow painted curbing will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for specifics. 3. Street names are required for the main road entering the project and the loop road serving the twin homes. Street signs shall be installed prior to building construction. The current street names proposed on the plan are Oriole Drive and Oriole Lane. The name Oriole has already been used within the City of Chanhassen and may not be reused within this development. Alternative proposed street names must be submitted to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. 4. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Prior to combustible construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 6. In lieu of a fire lane to the back side of the building, additional fire protection features shall be provided, including but not limited to Class 1 standpipes installed per Fire Department requirements. 7. Provide to Chanhassen Fire Marshal radius turn dimensions for accessing the building. The concern is the center islands for getting fire apparatus to the front doors. Engineering Conditions: The low area where filtration basins #1 and #2 discharge shall be modeled or the discharge pipes shall directly tie-in to the MnDOT drainage system. 2. Plans must show the location and elevations of the Emergency Over -Flows (EOFs) on the project, specifically for Filtration Basin #1, #2, #4 and #5. 3. Plans must show the style of home for the twin homes. 34 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 4. The stand-alone SWPPP document shall be submitted to the city for review with the final plat documents and will be required prior to any earth disturbing activities. 5. An NPDES construction permit must be granted to the applicant prior to any earth disturbing activities. 6. Stockpile locations shall be shown on the plans. 7. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 8. Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 9. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 10. If a wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier would be required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 11. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7- ton design. 12. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set. 13. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide and the parking spaces must be 18 feet long. 14. Pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. 15. If required by MnDOT, the applicant shall obtain a LUP for the trail connection on MnDOT right-of-way. 16. All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city's requirements for public utilities. 17. The plan shall use 2017 Chanhassen standard detail plates, which are available on the city's website. 18. This parcel has paid the city for one (1) water and sanitary service hook-up. The additional twin home units (7) must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook-up fee at the time of final plat. The remaining hook-up fees would be paid with the building permit. 19. The hook-up fees for the main building are due with the building permit. 20. All work within the MnDOT right-of-way must be approved by MnDOT. 35 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 21. This site will need to be compliant with the City of Chanhassen's MS4 permit. 22. The applicant's engineer will continue to work with the Watershed District to update their permit and meet requirements. 23. City staff will evaluate the design based on the requirements above until the city receives confirmation from the Watershed District that this project will be evaluated under a different requirement. The annual reduction by the proposed BMPs (Best Management Practices) are 67% removal for TSS and 60% removal for TP. This does not meet the requirements for TSS, so the design must be revised. The current design removes only 20% of the required 1.1" of impervious run-off volume. The design must be revised to meet the 1.1" volume removal. 24. The applicant shall evaluate the practicality of implementing, to the "maximum extent practicable," volume reducing practices including re -use. 25. The P8 model submitted shows an anticipated infiltration rate of 1.0"/hour, this is contrary to the MN Stormwater Manual's estimation for Type D soils: 0.06"/hour and shall be revised. 26. The construction plans shall include filtration basin cross sections and call out information about the iron filings. 27. The infiltrometer testing results for each basin shall be submitted to the city to verify the infiltration rate prior to release of the security for the filtration basins. 28. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. 29. In areas where storm water is directed to the basin through a catch basin, a sump manhole, at least three feet in depth should be used, four feet is recommended. 30. The plans shall label the sump catch basins. 31. The proposed BMPs will be privately owned. 32. Erosion control blanket shall include the swales in their entirety. 33. The design of the stormwater BMPs shall follow the guidelines of the MN Stormwater Manual unless the City Engineer agrees to a deviation for those guidelines. 34. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. 35. Staff strongly recommends using plantings rather than seed, as seed can take up to three growing seasons to establish. The city will not release security until the vegetation is established. 36 Chanhassen City Council — May 8, 2017 36. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. Planning Conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to improve the screening of the southwesterly portion of the site through the use of berming and landscaping. 2. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 3. The site is permitted one monument sign facing Great Plains Boulevard. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 4. Approval of the Site Plan application is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment and Final Plat Approval. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Resolution #2017-32: Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the Limited Use Permit (LUP) resolution with MnDOT for a trail connection that requires grading within Highway 101 right-of-way with the following conditions: Approval of the Limited Use Permit (LUP) is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Site Plan Permit and Final Plat Approval. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much council. And thank you Mr. Hoagberg. Best of luck to you on your development. Todd Gerhardt: We can bring this back for final plat approval. Mayor Laufenburger: That would be great. Okay. Alright. ADOPTION OF UPDATE FOR ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW FOR AVIENDA. Mayor Laufenburger: Is this your's Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: I'll start, yeah. I'll introduce it here if you give me just one second. Mayor Laufenburger: And you're going to give us some history on how this has been handled so far, is that correct? 37 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is Community for Life -Providing forToday and Planning forTomorrow May 15, 2017 Sperides Reiners Architects, hic. Eric Reiners 4200 W. Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, MN 55437 Re: Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 Dear Mr. Reiners, This letter is to formally notify you that on May 8, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motions: 1. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT "The City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Mission Hills to allow High Density Use with a Childcare Center on the site and set standards for the structures as shown below with the following conditions, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact. 1. The site must comply with the DNR Shoreland Rules. 2. The site shall comply with the following standards: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed PH %2.227.noo • www.d.chanhassen.m Us • FX952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 2 of 12 Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the commercial development shall comply with the Neighborhood Business District, BN. Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 31 a Addition shad comply witii tlielt=i2 b. Permitted Uses keighberhood oriented retail anEl seMee establishmenAs to meet daily needs etmr-estdeats. Sveh uses may inelude sfaall te medium sized festaufant (no Elr-ive dffu windows), , day eaFe . The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: • Single Family Residential • Medium Density Residential Sigh C. Setbacks In the PUD standards. the buildin setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The Hi parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of- way and/or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the HigbjbM portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Street Commercial Building Setback* Residential Residential Parking Setback Commercial Parking Setback* Building Setback Highway 101 * 50, 20' Highwg 212 * 50, 20' West 86`b Street * 30' 20' Interior Lot Lines O'(from commercial) 50 from residential 0' 0' 0' (from commercial) 35 from residential * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 3 of 12 Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 91 Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 10's Supplemental filed April 10,1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8,111b Supplemental filed May 7,1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8,121 Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; Mission Hills 2°a Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Mission Hills 311 Addition: A s Width: 480 feet Depth: 620 feet BLOCK USE Net Lot Density Hard Surface Area Coverage pia} Mamity hild Daycare hild gcres F Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi -Family 18 acres 7.66 37% Block 4, Mission Hills 1 56 Multi -Family Units 8.92 acres 6.28 43.2% Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 4 of 12 Y atible to the building. RESIDENTIAL 1. Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. g to up, Lot 1, Block 1, Mission s 31" Addition shall: sW*ntraIR b• Insure that all foundation walls reeved by landscaping or retaining walls. ave materials which include niWnry, painted siding, and exterior finish and ulatiogs ste (E.LF.S. , nd, the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All �'tio _` be ublic have red equal attention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2'/2 inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 5 of 12 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. L Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be permitted for Lot 1, Block 1, Mssion Hills 31 Addition. shall be peFmioed fef: the outlet and one monumeW sign Lesiaenfial see6en of the PUD 1. . Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 6 of 12 RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. g. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum hei t of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. 2. "The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. Unit Type No. of Units Amount Total Independent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380 000 Assisted/MemoryCare Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000 Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000 Total $478 000 Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 7of12 Engineering Conditions: 1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69. These shall be due with the final plat. 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance manual that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against the property. 4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the BMPs. Planning Conditions: 1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit (LUP) resolution and Site Plan application." 3. SITE PLAN APPROVAL "The City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 136-unit senior housing apartment with a childcare center and eight twin homes, Planning Case 2017-07 as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resource Conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for approval. The revised plan shall meet minimum bufferyard requirements. 2. Additional planting may be required along the southern half of the east property line. 3. Park grade trees are not acceptable quality and will not meet landscape standards for the City of Chanhassen. Item #12 of the General Notes shall be deleted. 4. The applicant shall consider locating landscaping along the rain garden near the comer of 866' St W and 101 to block headlight glare from turning vehicles. Building Official Conditions: 1. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. A "Code Record" is required (Code Record schematic plans may be same scale as architectural). Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 8 of 12 For "Code Record" information go to MN Dept. of Labor and Industry: htto://www.dli.mn.goy/CCLD/PlanConstruction-M 2. Buildings must be protected with automatic fire suppression systems. As required by Minnesota State Building Code and /or Minnesota State Residential Code. 3. An accessible route must be provided to all buildings, parking facilities, public transportation stops and common use facilities. 4. Parking areas, including parking garages, must be provided with accessible parking spaces dispersed among the various parking areas and building entrances. 5. Accessible dwelling units must be provided in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. 6. The building owner and/or their representatives should meet with the Inspections Division to discuss plan review and permit procedures (in particular, type of construction and allowable area issues must be addressed). Fire Marshal Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow painted curbing will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for specifics. Street names are required for the main road entering the project and the loop road serving the twin homes. Street signs shall be installed prior to building construction. The current street names proposed on the plan are Oriole Drive and Oriole Lane. The name Oriole has already been used within the City of Chanhassen and may not be reused within this development. Alternative proposed street names must be submitted to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. 4. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Prior to combustible construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 6. In lieu of a fire lane to the back side of the building, additional fire protection features shall be provided, including but not limited to Class I standpipes installed per Fire Department requirements. 7. Provide to Chanhassen Fire Marshal radius turn dimensions for accessing the building. The concern is the center islands for getting fire apparatus to the front doors. Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 9 of 12 En6neerin¢ Conditions: 1. The low area where filtration basins #1 and #2 discharge shall be modeled or the discharge pipes shall directly tie-in to the MnDOT drainage system. 2. Plans must show the location and elevations of the Emergency Over -Flows (EOFs) on the project, specifically for Filtration Basin #1, #2, #4 and #5. 3. Plans must show the style of home for the twin homes. 4. The stand-alone SWPPP document shall be submitted to the city for review with the final plat documents and will be required prior to any earth disturbing activities. 5. An NPDES construction pemut must be granted to the applicant prior to any earth disturbing activities. 6. Stockpile locations shall be shown on the plans. 7. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 8. Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 9. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 10. If a wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier would be required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 11. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7- ton design. 12. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set. 13. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide and the parking spaces must be 18 feet long. 14. Pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. 15. The applicant shall obtain a LUP for the trail connection on MnDOT right-of-way. 16. All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city's requirements for public utilities. Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 10 of 12 17. The plan shall use 2017 Chanhassen standard detail plates, which are available on the city's website. 18. This parcel has paid the city for one (1) water and sanitary service hook-up. The additional twin home units (7) must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook-up fee at the time of final plat. The remaining hook-up fees would be paid with the building permit. 19. The hook-up fees for the main building are due with the building permit. 20. All work within the MnDOT right-of-way must be approved by MnDOT. 21. This site will need to be compliant with the City of Chanhassen's MS4 permit. 22. The applicant's engineer will continue to work with the Watershed District to update their permit and meet requirements. 23. City staff will evaluate the design based on the requirements above until the city receives confirmation from the Watershed District that this project will be evaluated under a different requirement. The annual reduction by the proposed BMPs (Best Management Practices) are 67% removal for TSS and 60% removal for TP. This does not meet the requirements for TSS, so the design must be revised. The current design removes only 20% of the required 1.1" of impervious run-off volume. The design must be revised to meet the 1.1" volume removal. 24. The applicant shall evaluate the practicality of implementing, to the "maximum extent practicable," volume reducing practices including re -use. 25. The P8 model submitted shows an anticipated infiltration rate of 1.0"/hour, this is contrary to the MN Stormwater Manual's estimation for Type D soils: 0.06"/hour and shall be revised. 26. The construction plans shall include filtration basin cross sections and call out information about the iron filings. 27. The infiltrometer testing results for each basin shall be submitted to the city to verify the infiltration rate prior to release of the security for the filtration basins. 28. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. 29. In areas where storm water is directed to the basin through a catch basin, a sump manhole, at least three feet in depth should be used, four feet is recommended. 30. The plans shall label the sump catchbasins. Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 11 of 12 31. The proposed BMPs will be privately owned. 32. Erosion control blanket shall include the swales in their entirety. 33. The design of the stormwater BMPs shall follow the guidelines of the MN Stormwater Manual unless the City Engineer agrees to a deviation for those guidelines. 34. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. 35. Staff strongly recommends using plantings rather than seed, as seed can take up to three growing seasons to establish. The city will not release security until the vegetation is established. 36. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. Planning Conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to improve the screening of the southwesterly portion of the site through the use of bemvng and landscaping. 2. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 3. The site is permitted one monument sign facing Great Plains Boulevard. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 4. Approval of the Site Plan application is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit (LUP) resolution and Final Plat Approval." 4. LRVRTED USE PERMIT RESOLUTION: "The City Council approves the Limited Use Permit (LUP) resolution with MnDOT for a trail connection that requires grading within Highway 101 right-of-way with the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Limited Use Permit (LUP) is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Site Plan Permit and Final Plat Approval." A site plan agreement must be prepared by the city; however, cost estimates for the project must be submitted prior to document preparation. Mission Hills Approval Letter Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2017-07 May 15, 2017 Page 12 of 12 Final plat documents must be submitted to the City four weeks prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 952.227.1134 or e-mail at saliaMbei.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner Enclosure c: Michael Hoagberg ec: Stephanie Smith, Project Engineer g.\plsn\2017 planmng caws\17-07 mission hills senior liv g\appmv l leumdoc ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8'/2" x 11"), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29-06 c:\users\ ennyp\appdataVocal\microsoft\windowsUnetcache\content.outlook\7c7e12phfinal plat submittal.doc Chanhassen City Council4—tay 8, 2017 1 --1-- C)+ Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Campion. Any finther discussion? Resolution #2017-31: Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council adopts the attached resolution vacating a portion of the drainage and utility easement on 7500 Chanhassen Road as described on the attached Exhibit. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Congratulations Tracey and Chris. Enjoy your new home. Chris Rust: Thank you very much. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor I just want to thank the Rust's. It's not a simple process when you live in existing home and you want to tear it down and build a new one so they were great to work with and appreciate your patience and working through the system. We don't usually get that and thank you. Tracey Rust: Thank you. Chris Rust: Thank you. APPROVAL OF MISSION HILLS SENIOR HOUSING PUD AMENDMENT, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY PLAT: ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING LIMITED USE PERMIT Mayor Laufenburger: I bet this is your's Kate. Kate Aanenson: Yes it is. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright Ms. Aanenson, staff report please. Kate Aanenson: Yes, thank you Mayor, members of the City Council. This item did appear before the Planning Commission on April 18`s and there was unanimous approval of it so this is an application for Mission Hills Senior Living. A little bit different than what you saw before and I'll go through the history here briefly. The site is located on 8600 Great Plains Boulevard. The background on this is that as part of the original Mission Hills which had a number of different densities or different uses on there, guiding. This was kind of an older district that we had. It was a mixed use so in that there was low density. Medium density and also commercial. The commercial piece was given, and they wanted to stay, have that piece stay there and that was actually put in place before 212 was built and once 212 got built that piece across the street where the Kwik Trip is and the Kraus -Anderson property actually made that site more advantageous for commercial use. Over time we had tried to work with the Klingelbutz family 11 Chanhassen City Councilay 8, 2017 • looking at, MnDOT was reluctant to give a right turn in and some of those turn movements for commercial were problematic so we worked looking at some other alternative uses for this site and because there is additional density we felt that the senior housing project was a good project. So as that moved through the process there was, you can look at the density as how many units could be on the site based on the acreage so in that circumstances there could be up to 246 and a project was approved under the 210 actual number of units so that was the project that was approved so just strictly senior housing that was what we considered service enriched so you could go through the cycle there and also some townhouses that were also a part of that project. That project was approved a number of years ago and sat for a while. I just want again review the land use there so the subject property, you can see is the commercial piece which also does allow the residential and again that mixed use development is what the underlying land use is so it is consistent with the land use and also the zoning. So this project is a little complex in the fact that it does fall within the shoreland district so a part of the property to the north ended up with the townhouse project which, to keep the 50 percent open space within the shoreland district and also staying within the height regulations of the shoreland district which is the 35 feet. So the four story building ends up on the south side of the site. Mayor Laufenburger: Outside of the water? Kate Aanenson: Correct, outside of the watershed so this here is now the senior housing. The change here then is they actually put in a daycare on the site so the project changed slightly in the fact that now a daycare is introduced to the site and they will still enter off of 86' Street and then come down. It will be one way traffic controlled here and for the daycare on this side of the building and so it's intergenerational. At the Planning Commission the testimony there was very supportive of having intergenerational there. The senior housing and the daycare and feel really good about that. One of the buffer, the concerns was the buffering here so I think they worked hard to manage that separation there and the change in grade. So again we talked about access coming off of 86s . This is one of the issues that was addressed before with the project. 866, Street and the restricted lane here. So with additional turn movements coming here out on West 861s Street and a left turn at this intersection can be problematic at certain peak times. MnDOT and the County are aware of those issues and will be monitoring that if there needs to be any changes in place but as of right now the traffic study does show that it will work and I'll let the City Engineer, if he wants to add a few comments there regarding traffic in itself. Paul Oehme: So thanks Ms. Aanenson, members of council. So yeah SRF did complete a traffic study in conjunction with the development. We did have meetings with MnDOT and Carver County. We looked at several options. A signal is not warranted at this location. It's a T intersection and the traffic generated from the existing site and the new site just did not meet that warrant for a new signal. By putting in a signal without meeting warrants it can actually decrease the level of safety at the intersections over time as well too so we are, looked at several options. Adding some islands and some other features. Redoing the median on 101 but at this time the best option we think is just to monitor it and see how much traffic in the a.m. and the P.m. and we'll make some changes down the road if necessary. 12 Chanhassen City Council qay 8, 2017 • Kate Aanenson: So I was just going to add then too for the daycare itself will have 90 children and then approximately 8,600 square feet. So we want to make sure there's connectivity so one of the things would be the continuation of the sidewalk and then also the, we needed a limited use permits from MnDOT for this trail connection through here so that's one of your motions tonight to be included in that. And then to accommodate the daycare one of the twinhomes, the rental twinhomes was eliminated so that would be the significant changes in the project itself. Again the architecture is similar to what we had seen before. Highly enhanced. It matches what's in the neighborhood. Real articulated so staff and the Planning Commission was very supportive of that. Material sample. Again showing the twinhomes. Again blending with the architecture of the senior project itself and the daycare. There will be a sign. This sign is located on 101 so the sign will be senior living. The daycare can also is permitted to have a sign so they could have one on their project also but the sign will, as you can see on the right here where that will be located. Parks, that was an issue that was brought up before. Is there adequate parks in the area? There is open space on the site as I mentioned earlier. There's a sidewalk for connectivity in that area. There's also, you can connect to the trail that was put in with a recent Knoblauch subdivision if you wanted to head to the east to get back around Rice Lake Marsh too. So I mentioned the limited use permit and that was in order to get the trail onto 101 so there's the other part of the connectivity so that's one of the motions included in your packet. So this is also a plat included in this. This is an outlot so we are platting this lot to allow for this project. So again there's 4 motions for you. The resolution for the limited use permit, the preliminary plat, the site plan approval and the PUD. With that I'd be happy to answer any questions that you might have. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Ms. Aanenson. Any questions of staff from council? Councilwoman Ryan, questions? Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. Can you explain the limited use permit for the trail please? Kate Aanenson: It's MnDOT's right-of-way and so the description there just limits how you can use that and if they need to get in there and address it. Paul Oehme: Right so we'll have ownership of the trail within the right-of-way. They just allow for that use and they want to just make sure that we're maintaining it so, down the road we might have to update the limited use of that document but it's just basically for future maintenance to make sure that it's in good condition. Councilwoman Ryan: So it's basically saying that Chanhassen will maintain the trail, that's what. Paul Oehme: Within the right-of-way. Councilwoman Ryan: Within the right-of-way. 13 Chanhassen City Council * —May 8, 2017 • Paul Oehme: Yeah so MnDOT doesn't give limited use permits to developers to they have to work through the City for that. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Okay, thank you. Kate Aanenson: And to be clear it's for trail purposes, yeah. Councilwoman Ryan: Right, okay. And then you mentioned something about the, a twin home being removed. Kate Aanenson: Yeah so there was originally with the project there was 9 so now they're down to the 8 and that was to accommodate the parking. Additional parking required with the daycare and better circulation through the site. One way circulation for drop off. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And then in terms of the daycare is that, just out of curiosity, is that then independently owned or does that? Kate Aanenson: I'll let the applicant answer that question if you wouldn't mind. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Kate Aanenson: If they partner with somebody or. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. We'll get to that. And then I do, if I may ask another question. I am concerned about the traffic issue. I know it came up in the meeting when we discussed this before and I understand that it's going to be monitored by Carver County and you know watch it. A couple concerns that I have is first in reading some of the information the Mission Hills Garden Homeowners Association said that they had sent two requests. I'm assuming you've met with them and discussed this. They've been involved in the conversation about it. And some of their suggestions were about doing something with the median or breaking it down or having a better, just some of the vantage point I guess or views with the speed coming north on 101. People coming from the light. Picking up speed and then making that left turn lane off of 80s onto 101 is concerning. Paul Oehme: Right so one of the improvements that the developer would be making with this project is to eliminate a portion of the median that's currently out there. Todd Gerhardt: On 86`s. Paul Oehme: On 86' Street to restripe it correct. Right so that's an improvement that's going to be made here. Just a little bit more visibility. Taking some of the vegetation out of the median and allowing for better sight distances. 14 Chanhassen City Council 4tay 8, 2017 • Kate Aanenson: So I think it also allows for the free left and the free right so, and then there. Councilwoman Ryan: So there's no back up on 800 Kate Aanenson: Help reduce the back up, the stacking yeah. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And when Carver County says that they're going to monitor the situation on 101, I mean is it just are we waiting for so many accidents until something's done or just knowing that it's a senior housing it's a fast road on 101. 1 know it doesn't constitute a full light, a signal but can you do flashing lights? Is there anything to just make people aware of that intersection? Paul Oehme: For this, it's kind of a difficult intersection to make substantial improvements to for traffic flow. Like I had mentioned before we did look at a splitter island at this intersection and would basically would mean that reducing the center median. Having that as, if you're going southbound on 101 kind of a stacking area here and little bit better safety location in the median here when people pull out and go southbound onto 101. We're a little bit hesitant to take that to the next step and just because of some of the conflicts that potentially could happen at the intersection. We did look at like I said we looked at signals. We looked at other traffic safety devices as well. Nothing really, and additional striping too. Nothing really jumped out at us as a significant improvement from currently what's out there today. There is left turn lanes on southbound 101 to get into, onto 86`h Street and there are stacking lanes on 86'h Street for left and right turn lanes so it is a wide intersection. Four lanes on Highway 101. I think that's what causes most of the problems. You know to decrease the width of 101 is really problematic just because of the volumes of traffic that go through the intersection so you know it's a tough, tough location to really make any significant improvements. You know we looked at roundabouts too there. There isn't warrants for that. That's not in the cards right now either so like I said Carver County's going to be monitoring. The City will be monitoring as well. We'll take traffic counts and work with Carver County on traffic counts on 101 too and ever so often we do traffic counts on 86`h Street as well too so we'll hear from neighbors as well. We'll monitor those and take that into consideration too so that's kind of the process and the path that we are proposing to move forward with. Councilwoman Ryan: And when you did the traffic study and looked at this area what do they anticipate most of the turn movements being? Is the volume higher going, making a right or is it going left to get onto 212? Paul Oehme: Most of the turning movements are still that left hand movement going southbound on 101. Let me see if I can pull it up here. Yeah so it's in the future they're looking at 79 left turns onto 101 and then on northbound it's about 64 trips during the peak hour. And that's the a.m. and then the p.m.'s a little bit less than that but I guess there is a little bit more on the left hand turns but the right hand turns are pretty high as well. 15 Chanhassen City CouncilIMay 8, 2017 • Councilwoman Ryan: Okay I'll hold for now, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Just related to that Mr. Oehme, when this development first began, when Mission Hills first developed as residential, this property was it originally zoned as commercial? Kate Aanenson: Yeah it was mixed use so commercial. We had a number of offices look at that and the peak demand at offices were significantly worst because you had more trips coming in at the same time. Mayor Laufenburger: That was my question. Kate Aanenson: Yep so, so staff felt like as far as a developable parcel this was really the best possible solution. Mayor Laufenburger: So what you're saying in, what I'm hearing you say is that when this entire development fast began and the road construction, not only 86`s Street but what's the road just north of there? Where there's a right turn only. Kate Aanenson: Marsh Glen. Mayor Laufenburger: Marsh Glen, is that what it is? So when this development was originally planned and approved the anticipated traffic from this property, though it was vacant at the time, the anticipated traffic was greater than what you're calculating it will be with the senior living and the daycare, am I saying that correctly? Kate Aanenson: 'That's correct, yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so I'm with Councilmember Ryan on one thing and that is the monitoring. Can you give us an example Mr. Oehme of what would, what sort of actions or what sort of incidents would prompt the City and the County to take action of some sort beyond what it is right now? Beyond removing some of the median on 86a . Can you give us an example? Paul Oehme: Sure. So traffic flow is obviously one of them. We look at say the level of service for the intersection. That's how the intersection performs. How much wait time you're going to get. You're going to look at, at an intersection on each of the legs so we look at that. We hear from property owners. Complaints. You know it's backing up, way backing up into say the next intersection and I've got a lot of wait time. You know people are making unwise choices running through the intersection at times so we hear from the public on those type of things. Like I said Carver County does take traffic counts on 101 I think every 2 years so we'll know, we'll look at volumes of traffic on 101 to see if they're increasing. How does that correlate to 16 Chanhassen City Council �ay 8, 2017 • the traffic on 86`" Street. Those type of things. So just a lot of different things that we'll be looking at in the future. Mayor Laufenburger: But specifically you identified 79 left turns in a peak off of 86`h onto southbound 101. Is that what you said? Paul Oehme: Correct, yep 79. Mayor Laufenburgcr: And 64 north turns northbound. PaulOehme: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And obviously people in the neighborhood if they detect that there are more cars that are stacking up to turn left they would probably go to that Marsh Glen exit to get their right turn. Paul Oehme: They have that option. Mayor Laufenburger: They have that option, okay. So alright. Todd Gerhardt: Paul are those movements within an hour or 2 hour range? Paul Oehme: So those movements are the peak hours so it's typically from 8:00 to 9:00 during the day and then we also look at the p.m. peak hours as well so, and the traffic study too, the level of service at the intersection right now is a level B which is fairly good. We try to keep it about a C and with the new development the projections are to remain at a level B so we're going to be looking at that and seeing if the projections in here are made in the future if the development were to move forward. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilmember Campion, did you have a question or comment? Councilman Campion: Yeah I just have one follow up question for Mr. Oehme. In a situation like this where there isn't a good solution for the left hand turn it looks like to increase the safety much is it, would you consider making it right turn only? Paul Oehme: Yeah we looked at that too. A right-in/right-out or something like that. We've, it's kind of a balancing act. If you make a right-in/right-out or reduce or a three-quarter access you're limiting the mobility of that neighborhood and it's, that's not a, you know if it's not warranted you know we don't want to put hardships on the neighbors as well either so it's kind of a balancing act in terms of safety and mobility so at this time we're not, we wouldn't propose that but again that's something if, you know if the intersection were to degrade over time substantially that would be another tool that we would look at but at this time we're not proposing that. 17 Chanhassen City Councilkay 8, 2017 • Councilman Campion: Yeah I mean just looking at elongating the left turns stacking I mean doesn't seem with the amount of additional cars that are being added to the neighborhood, it's hard to imagine that problem getting any better. Mayor Laufenburger: Did you have another? Councilman Campion: No that's it. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Oehme and Kate, are there any other residential developments planned back in this area? I know we bad Mr. Knoblauch. Is there anything else that would add more? Kate Aanenson: No. Let me just go back to that kind of the overview of that, of this area. So if we go out to Mission Hills Lane, I think the challenge would be if everybody went up this way that would be the end on people on Tigua and the end of Knob, this development. Knob Hill? No. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Knob, is that Mister? Kate Aanenson: Is Mr. Knoblauch's but anyway you're pushing that up to a low density which is this is a right out only on that intersection so that goes to what Mr. Oehme was speaking about. It presents some other challenges because all the townhouse projects here. The higher density here. Mayor Laufenburger: But there's no further residential development to the east? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. That's correct. It would be fully developed. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright. Anybody else questions? Councilwoman Ryan: I have one more. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilmember Ryan, go ahead. Councilwoman Ryan: When they redid the road on 101, or redid 101 and they changed it to a right only out of Mission Hills, was that for safety reasons? Paul Oehme: It wasn't for safety as I recall. It's more mobility. It's just another access. Before 861 Street was one long dead end. A big cul-de-sac so it doesn't meet with our code. It was you know it was more for a safety perspective you want to have at least more than one access point for this size of a development so it was more of a mobility and safety consideration that that access was installed, or connected to 101. m j i J Chanhassen City Council�ay 8, 2017 • Councilwoman Ryan: Because I mean before they put the median in they were able to make the left turn out of there before the road was redone, correct? Or was it never, were you never able to go left? Kate Aanenson: I don't think it was there because Mission Hills subdivision, I'm not sure on that. Mayor Laufenburger: I'm not understanding your question Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: I thought at one point they were able to make a both left and right turn out of Mission Hills and then. Mayor Laufenburger: Out of Mission Hills from 86s'? Todd Gerhardt: She's right, it was a 2 lane highway 101. It didn't have a median. Councilwoman Ryan: And so if you go, if you look up, if it's north over Mission Hills before they redid 101 Mission Hills could come out and they could make either a left or a right turn. Mayor Laufenburger: But that's when the road was occupying the corridor that is currently Waters Edge Drive, am I correct on that? Kate Aanenson: The old 101. Mayor Laufenburger: The divided two highway, or the divided highway of 101 supplanted Waters Edge Drive as 101. Todd Gerhardt: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So it was two lane. Dangerous as can be. Todd Gerhardt: As you came out of Mission Hills Lane you could make a left or a right. After the reconstruction of 101 into a 4 lane it was decided that the full intersection would be concentrated at 861" Street. So anybody wanting to make a left hand turn in the Mission Hills development would have to go to 8& Street to do that. So before it was just a 2 lane highway. Councilwoman Ryan: I mean my point being that now we're, even though a 2 lane highway might be unsafe I think crossing 2 lanes of traffic that are gaining speed into, you know to head south, to not have some sort of a safe lane for people to turn into is concerning to me especially noting that it's senior housing and it just is concerning to me. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there not a left turn lane in 101 south? Right at 861s Street. 19 Chanhassen City Councilkay 8, 2017 • Paul Oehme: There is a left turn lane. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah Kate showed it on the map. There's a left and a right. Councilwoman Ryan: But a left safe like to turn onto 101. Paul Oehme: Right, yeah. So there's the left turn there. Councilman Campion: You have to get on and get up to speed right away. Paul Oehme: Yeah so. Councilwoman Ryan: There's no like receiving lane. Mayor Laufenburger: Acceleration lane. Councilwoman Ryan: Right. Paul Oehme: Right. Councilwoman Ryan: Some sort of a receiving lane next to the median to get across and then accelerate onto 101 because you know you're trying to cut across traffic that's headed north and you're trying to head south. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Oehme what, what traffic incidents have you, have been reported at that location? Paul Oehme: I know when the traffic study they looked at that. I don't have that right in front of me right now but as I recall it wasn't in the high severity crash intersection so in, that's one of the items that we look at when evaluating intersections for warrants. For a signal so it didn't rise to that threshold either. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Paul Oehme: To Mrs. Ryan's point we did look at decreasing the size of the median at this location here and having an acceleration lane for southbound traffic. The problem is that at the intersection you have to put another median at this location for safety purposes and we were just a little concerned at this time about the traffic crossing at that location and some conflicts that potentially could happen there so you know we're, staff is more than willing to look at that a little bit harder and see if we need to, if there's another option out there that we can have an acceleration lane going southbound in a safe zone basically so you can pull out. You know 20 Chanhassen City Counciltay 8, 2017 • crossing the two northbound lanes and then having a safe area there to accelerate to the south so we can look at that option again. Todd Gerhardt: Paul isn't the safety zone where your red dot is? There's plenty of room for 1 to 2 cars right there before they make the left hand tam. Paul Oehme: There's I would say maybe one car. The problem is that. Todd Gerhardt: Going to pass around Google Maps and you can take a look. Councilwoman Ryan: Dan has it on. Paul Oehme: But the problem is, yeah there's no acceleration area. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah there's plenty of room for 2 cars there because there are cars on the road. You know the other point is anybody that if you close that intersection off is one option. Then people are going to go down to the apartments and St. Hubert's and make a U turn to go south. Councilwoman Ryan: Right. And I'm not suggesting closing it off. I think it's important to have the access to make both the left and the right hand turn lane. I disagree that there is room there to get across and accelerate onto southbound 101. I mean I think it's still tight. Todd Gerhardt: No I wouldn't, I'm not saying accelerate. I'm saying waiting until the cars are through then go. Paul Oehme: You know we've observed that cars do, you know one car or so can stop right here and then wait for traffic on southbound 101 and then go after that but it's not a very safe movement I would say because anybody that's heading southbound and want to make that left there might be a conflict that they run into so it depends on where the car is so. So we'll, staff is more than willing to look at that option again and see if we can come up with a better solution. Councilwoman Ryan: I would prefer that you did just to take a harder look at what the possibilities are for more of a safe zone or an acceleration lane. My concern is that waiting for 2 years to do another traffic study it's, I think it's easier to get something done while the project is underway versus waiting to see what happens and the what happens situation is not a good you know what if so. Paul Oehme: Okay. Councilwoman Ryan: I'd appreciate that. Thank you. 21 Chanhassen City Councilkay 8, 2017 • Mayor Laufenburger: Any other questions or comments? Kate can you just clarify for me in it's simplest form, so this project came before the council previously and we gave it an approval, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: So the significant changes are number one, you're adding the limited use trail. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: You're taking away a twin home. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And you're adding a daycare. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: So those are the 3 primary things right? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And the daycare you identified 8,600 square feet. Is that a repurposing of 8,600 square feet or is it an adding of an additional 8,600 square feet. Kate Aanenson: They still have the same number of units. I'll let them speak to that a little bit more about who their vendor is and how that will be operated. They are here tonight. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, that might be a good segue. I wonder if the applicant would like to speak at this time. And answer any questions we may have. Simply just identify yourself, your organization. Mike Hoagberg: Hi I'm Mike Hoagberg with Headwaters Development. We're out of Lakeville, Minnesota. Thank you for your time tonight and there's a lot of good questions and things that we've been struggling with a little bit on this development but what we think is a little more exciting is some of the things that we added to this. We think we enhanced the project over time. We understand that it's taken a little while to get to this point but with working with our operator Ebenezer we've spent a lot of time thinking about is there a better enhanced use than just the senior component and what kept coming to the surface was this daycare component. Intergenerational is a big push. We've seen a lot of great success in previous Ebenezer projects and we think this location and in the city of Chanhassen is a fantastic opportunity. We look at taking that energy of those children and putting them with the seniors and the wisdom and 22 Chanhassen City Counciltay 8, 2017 • friendship that they can provide and making sure that that's all very cohesive throughout the building is important and we've seen a lot of great success, not only from the seniors but also with the children and so we're excited to add that component. As we mentioned we did lose one of the twin homes but we think that improved the circulation throughout the site and allows for the pick up and drop off to be more efficient. And to answer a couple specific questions that you had, we did repurpose part of the square footage so it is the same number of units but we felt that it's important to have the actual daycare center in the main building and so on the, let's see here, it'd be the east. The first floor on the east side of the building. The front there is where the 8,600 square feet is. There's a separate entrance for the drop off and pick up. It's a secured entrance for the children. And then inside the center of the building will be a secured walkway where the children can come in to meet with the seniors and their community and the seniors can come into the daycare center. It is owned by our same ownership group. Ebenezer will be operating both the senior care component as well as the child care. They have a lot of experience doing that. They have their own specific dedicated staff to children and licensing and operating. I think that addressed those questions. Mayor Laufenburger: It did. Mike Hoagberg: And then the traffic study. We've done a couple of them to look at the different uses that we proposed for the site and we've struggled with it too. We think that this is a fairly busy intersection. I've been out there on several occasions trying different times of the day and some of them are more difficult, especially when the light changes at night or early in the morning or during those peak hours. From a senior component, one it's a little less usage. There's certain residents in there that aren't driving so that is reflected in the study but more importantly there's a lot of the senior driving component is off peak hours. It's not during the rush hours. We do have staff that will be coming in and out during those rush hours but it's typically not necessarily the resident. We do want to make a commitment. We understand it's a little difficult because it's part of the County has the decision on the roads and not necessarily the City but we want to commit that we want to work with you guys to figure this out because we do think it's a problem that needs a solution. I don't know what that is yet. We're talking about a lot of different options here and I agree. I think we should be more proactive on trying to figure out whether you know it's a stop light or a roundabout or whatever might be the best solution. I think we can collectively work together to figure that out. Mayor Laufenburger: Good, alright. Would you just stand for questions. Any questions of the applicant? Thank you for answering that repurposing question. Thank you Michael. Mike Hoagberg: Alright thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Look forward to having you in the community. Alright let's bring it back. Kate can you just put up that resolution one more time? So just restate for us the four elements of this motion. 23 Chanhassen City Councilay 8, 2017 • Kate Aanenson: One would be approving the PUD which specifies the twinhomes, the daycare, and the senior housing. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: A site plan approval so we showed you the architecture and the numbers of units. The preliminary plat. We're taking an outlot and creating a lot with the extractions that go with that and then a resolution for the limited use for the trail on MnDOT's property and then adoption of Findings of Fact. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And you called this a site plan approval and a preliminary plat. Is there, will this come back to the council for a final plat or not? Kate Aanenson: I don't believe so. Mayor Laufenburger: So once we approve this then we're essentially giving, we're giving permission for the developer to move forward exactly as they've identified? Kate Aanenson: Yes. I believe all the conditions are in for engineering that they need for the plat. Todd Gerhardt: Preliminary and final? Kate Aanenson: It's only noticed for preliminary on here so it may have to come back for just the final. Todd Gerhardt: Yep. Kate Aanenson: Yep so it would come back for just for the final plat, yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright let's bring it back to the council. Any further discussion? Discussion, comment or motion. Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Councilmember Ryan, yep. Councilwoman Ryan: So with that, with this motion and the question in terms of traffic and looking at it, where does that leave us because in, you know and you've been hearing the conversation. When you talk about a daycare obviously that's daily in and out by parents dropping their children off so, and thinking that they might then drop their children off and want to hop onto 212 to get into downtown so that's that left turn lane. So where does approving this motion leave the looking into the traffic and doing something on 101? 24 Chanhassen City CouncilMay 8, 2017 • Mayor Laufenburger: Kate are there, is traffic study part of the Findings of Fact? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Mr. Gerhardt did you want to give us any counsel on this? Todd Gerhardt: Mayor and council, if you want to make that as part of your motion to direct staff to look at alternative acceleration lanes on Market Boulevard to go south and you know bring that back as a feasibility study for your consideration we could do that. Mayor Laufenburger: But that direction is not, is that direction specifically needed to call this out? We've already heard Mr. Oehme say that he plans to work with the County to monitor activities there. Historically what has the council done historically in your experience here? Todd Gerhardt: Well historically the council's probably done both and if you still have your Google Maps and you move up to Market Boulevard and Lake Drive there's, which is I would say a busier intersection by Bookoo Bikes and Summerwood and there's no acceleration lane going south. There is a small acceleration lane going north and. Mayor Laufenburger: Right turn out of Summerwood onto north 101? Todd Gerhardt: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Is that what you're referring to? Todd Gerhardt: Yes. There is an acceleration, small acceleration going north but as you come out of the Summerwood, Bookoo Bikes area you have a choice of two lanes. Well really the inside lane. There's no acceleration lane. There's a median and then the two thru lanes that go to the south. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Oehme let's go back to 86' Street. Have you examined closely the sight lines? Are there any obstructions of sight lines such as any shrubbery or tall grasses in any direction? Paul Oehme: The 86's Street? No the vegetation in the median is far enough back from the intersection where I don't think there's any sight lines on 101. Mayor Laufenburger: You're talking about the median on 86s'? Paul Oehme: On 86' Street yeah, and then likewise on 101. Mayor Laufenburger: And isn't there, there is a path on the east side of 101 all the way right? 25 Chanhassen City Councilkay 8, 2017 • Paul Oehme: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Or trail I guess you would call it. Paul Oehme: Trail, yeah. So there really isn't any sight lines or vegetation issues at this intersection to obstruct visibility. Todd Gerhardt: Is there a left turn acceleration lane onto a four lane highway? Has that ever been designed? Paul Oehme: There's a few that are out there. Todd Gerhardt: Are there? PaulOehme: Yeah. Todd Gerhardt: I just haven't seen too many. Usually you kind of stop in the middle and then you go when there's an opening. Paul Oehme: Right. The problem is that it works better if there's a larger median. When you have a smaller median it's a little bit more difficult to have any vehicles there. Like on say Highway 7, I think that median's a little wider so if there's cars that are crossing say Highway 7 there's more stacking at those type of facilities than there are... Todd Gerhardt: But those at controlled intersections. Paul Oehme: No there's a couple out there that, I'm specifically thinking about one on Highway 7 in Excelsior there's a median there that I think you can stack at least 2 cars there. Todd Gerhardt: Okay. Paul Oehme: This one's a little bit narrower so it's a little harder to stack cars in the median. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, Councilmember Ryan I would say that based on Mr. Gerhardt's comments that this sometimes the staff or sometimes the staff is directed. Sometimes they're not. For my perspective and I guess I would like to hear from other council members, I think they got the message that the concern. Mr. Hoagberg mentioned. You've mentioned it. It's been reinforced by council and others that it needs to be watched. If there's something specific that we would like them to come back with, a recommendation I don't know if they're equipped to do that until, well no I think they could be equipped to do that. Come back with a recommendation. If you'd like to make that a part of the language of the motion or does it have to be part of the motion or we can just direct staff? 26 Chanhassen City Councilay 8, 2017 • Todd Gerhardt: Just direct us. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright so I would say you're welcome to make your statement on what you would like to see the staff come back with. Giving them some, and make it independent of this motion I would say. Are you comfortable with that? Councilwoman Ryan: Sure. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So state what you would like to see staff. Councilwoman Ryan: I would like staff to look at the option of either an acceleration lane headed south on Great Plains or the median on the south side of the intersection looks a little bit thicker than on the north side and maybe there would be space to do something there so if we could just look at an option for a safe zone or somewhere for people to turn into I'd appreciate it. Mayor Laufenburger: Including options, feasibility and costs? Paul Oehme: Absolutely we can put all that together. We have something similar to that already drawn up so. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Paul Oehme: So it won't be hard to put some numbers together. Mayor Laufenburger: And if you don't mind I think it'd be worthwhile for us to bring that back in a work session so we can talk in greater detail. Less formally about that. Are you okay with that? Councilwoman Ryan: That would be great. Paul Oehme: Absolutely. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Any other discussion, comment or motion? Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor I'll make a motion. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: I think it's a great project. I'd like to propose that the City Council approves a planned unit development amendment to the existing standards, Mission Hills PUD. P*A Chanhassen City Council—kay 8, 2017 0 A site plan approval for the construction of a 136 unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building, 8 twin homes, 16 independent living units, and a daycare center, and a preliminary plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition. And resolution approving a Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for a trail connection on property zoned planned unit development PUD and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard, Outlot E, Mission Hills, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Councilmember Ryan. We have a motion. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Campion. Any further discussion on this motion? Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Mission Hills to allow High Density Use with a Childcare Center on the site and set standards for the structures as shown below with the following conditions, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact: 1. The site must comply with the DNR Shoreland Rules. 2. The site shall comply with the following standards: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the commercial development shall comply with the Neighborhood Business District, BN. Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition shall comply with the R-12, High Density District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: • Single Family Residential • Medium Density Residential Chanhassen City Councilay 8, 2017 • • High Density Residential with a Child Daycare Center C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The High Density parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of-way and/ or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the High Density portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Commercial Residential Residential Commercial Street High Density Medium Density Parking Parking Building Setback* Building Setback Setback Setback* Highway 101 * 50' 20' Highway 212 * 50' 20' West 861s Street * 30' 20' Interior Lot Lines O'(from commercial) 0' 0' 0' (from commercial) 50'(from residential) 35' (from residential) * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Boa Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 9' Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 10`" Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 11' Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12d' Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; Mission Hills 2nd Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Mission Hills 3' Addition: Area: 376,358.4 square feet Width: 480 feet Depth: 620 feet Net Lot Hard Surface BLOCK USE Density Area Coverage 29 Chanhassen City Councilkay 8, 2017 • Mission Hills 3' 152 Multi -Family Units/Child Daycare 8.64 acres 17.5 50% Addition Center Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi -Family 18 acres 7.66 37% Units Block 4, Mission Hills 1 56 Multi -Family Units 8.92 acres 6.28 43.2% RESIDENTIAL 1. Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. 6. The apartment building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition shall: a. Have pronounced entrance. b. Insure that all foundation walls are screened by landscaping or retaining walls. c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. 30 1 Ad Chanhassen City Council•May 8, 2017 • In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2'/z inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f. Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be permitted for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition. 1. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 31 Chanhassen City Councilkay 8, 2017 • 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. g. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'd Addition shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, and subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. Unit Type No. of Units Amount Total Independent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000 Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000 Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000 Total $478,000 04 Chanhassen City Council�ay 8, 2017 • Engineering Conditions: 1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69. These shall be due with the final plat. 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance manual that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against the property. 4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the BMPs. Planning Conditions: 1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment and Site Plan application. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 136-unit senior housing apartment with a childcare center and eight twin homes, Planning Case 2017-07 as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, and subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resource Conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for approval. The revised plan shall meet minimum bufferyard requirements. 2. Additional planting may be required along the southern half of the east property line. 3. Park grade trees are not acceptable quality and will not meet landscape standards for the City of Chanhassen. Item #12 of the General Notes shall be deleted. 4. The applicant shall consider locating landscaping along the rain garden near the comer of 86`h St W and 101 to block headlight glare from turning vehicles. Building Official Conditions: The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. A "Code Record" is required (Code Record schematic plans may be same scale as architectural). For "Code Record" information go to MN Dept. of Labor and Industry: hM://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/PlanConstruction.asp 33 Chanhassen City Council 4—tay 8, 2017 • 2. Buildings must be protected with automatic fire suppression systems. As required by Minnesota State Building Code and /or Minnesota State Residential Code. 3. An accessible route must be provided to all buildings, parking facilities, public transportation stops and common use facilities. 4. Parking areas, including parking garages, must be provided with accessible parking spaces dispersed among the various parking areas and building entrances. 5. Accessible dwelling units must be provided in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. 6. The building owner and/or their representatives should meet with the Inspections Division to discuss plan review and permit procedures (in particular, type of construction and allowable area issues must be addressed). Fire Marshal Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow painted curbing will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for specifics. 3. Street names are required for the main road entering the project and the loop road serving the twin homes. Street signs shall be installed prior to building construction. The current street names proposed on the plan are Oriole Drive and Oriole Lane. The name Oriole has already been used within the City of Chanhassen and may not be reused within this development. Alternative proposed street names must be submitted to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. 4. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Prior to combustible construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 6. In lieu of a fire lane to the back side of the building, additional fire protection features shall be provided, including but not limited to Class 1 standpipes installed per Fire Department requirements. 7. Provide to Chanhassen Fire Marshal radius turn dimensions for accessing the building. The concern is the center islands for getting fire apparatus to the front doors. Engineering Conditions: The low area where filtration basins #1 and #2 discharge shall be modeled or the discharge pipes shall directly tie-in to the MnDOT drainage system. 2. Plans must show the location and elevations of the Emergency Over -Flows (EOFs) on the project, specifically for Filtration Basin #1, #2, #4 and #5. 3. Plans must show the style of home for the twin homes. 34 Chanhassen City Council•May 8, 2017 • 4. The stand-alone SWPPP document shall be submitted to the city for review with the final plat documents and will be required prior to any earth disturbing activities. 5. An NPDES construction permit must be granted to the applicant prior to any earth disturbing activities. 6. Stockpile locations shall be shown on the plans. 7. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 8. Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 9. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 10. If a wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier would be required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 11. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7- ton design. 12. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set. 13. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide and the parking spaces must be 18 feet long. 14. Pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. 15. If required by MnDOT, the applicant shall obtain a LUP for the trail connection on MnDOT right-of-way. 16. All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city's requirements for public utilities. 17. The plan shall use 2017 Chanhassen standard detail plates, which are available on the city's website. 18. This parcel has paid the city for one (1) water and sanitary service hook-up. The additional twin home units (7) must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook-up fee at the time of final plat. The remaining hook-up fees would be paid with the building permit. 19. The hook-up fees for the main building are due with the building permit. 20. All work within the MnDOT right-of-way must be approved by MnDOT. cM, Chanhassen City Council 4—tay 8, 2017 • 21. This site will need to be compliant with the City of Chanhassen's MS4 permit. 22. The applicant's engineer will continue to work with the Watershed District to update their permit and meet requirements. 23. City staff will evaluate the design based on the requirements above until the city receives confirmation from the Watershed District that this project will be evaluated under a different requirement. The annual reduction by the proposed BMPs (Best Management Practices) are 67% removal for TSS and 60% removal for TP. This does not meet the requirements for TSS, so the design must be revised. The current design removes only 20% of the required 1.1" of impervious run-off volume. The design must be revised to meet the 1.1" volume removal. 24. The applicant shall evaluate the practicality of implementing, to the "maximum extent practicable," volume reducing practices including re -use. 25. The P8 model submitted shows an anticipated infiltration rate of 1.0"/hour, this is contrary to the MN Stormwater Manual's estimation for Type D soils: 0.06"/hour and shall be revised. 26. The construction plans shall include filtration basin cross sections and call out information about the iron filings. 27. The infiltrometer testing results for each basin shall be submitted to the city to verify the infiltration rate prior to release of the security for the filtration basins. 28. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. 29. In areas where storm water is directed to the basin through a catch basin, a sump manhole, at least three feet in depth should be used, four feet is recommended. 30. The plans shall label the sump catch basins. 31. The proposed BMPs will be privately owned. 32. Erosion control blanket shall include the swales in their entirety. 33. The design of the stormwater BMPs shall follow the guidelines of the MN Stormwater Manual unless the City Engineer agrees to a deviation for those guidelines. 34. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. 35. Staff strongly recommends using plantings rather than seed, as seed can take up to three growing seasons to establish. The city will not release security until the vegetation is established. kR Chanhassen City Council kay 8, 2017 • 36. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. Planning Conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to improve the screening of the southwesterly portion of the site through the use of berming and landscaping. 2. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 3. The site is permitted one monument sign facing Great Plains Boulevard. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 4. Approval of the Site Plan application is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment and Final Plat Approval. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Resolution #2017-32: Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the Limited Use Permit (LUP) resolution with MnDOT for a trail connection that requires grading within Highway 101 right-of-way with the following conditions: Approval of the Limited Use Permit (LUP) is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Site Plan Permit and Final Plat Approval. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much council. And thank you Mr. Hoagberg. Best of luck to you on your development. Todd Gerhardt: We can bring this back for final plat approval. Mayor Laufenburger: That would be great. Okay. Alright. ADOPTION OF UPDATE FOR ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW FOR AVIENDA. Mayor Laufenburger: Is this your's Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: I'll start, yeah. I'll introduce it here if you give me just one second. Mayor Laufenburger: And you're going to give us some history on how this has been handled so far, is that correct? 37 • 1 1- o4- CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING APRIL 18, 2017 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, John Tietz, Maryam Yusuf, Nancy Madsen, and Mark Randall MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad, and Steve Weick STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; MacKenzie Walters, Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Mike Hoagberg Joy Gorra Dale Hetland Duane Moon Carol Dunsmore Char and Bill Schubert Karla Thomson Teri Byrne Gary Halona - Maryanne Dr. Carissa Haverly Doug Tucker 17550 Hemlock Avenue, Lakeville 1680 West 78a' Street 542 Mission Hill Drive 536 Mission Hill Drive 730 West 961h Street 9610 Meadowlark Lane 8524 Mayfield Court 700 West 90 Street 670 Creekwood Street 750 West 96s' Street 585 Mission Hills Way West PUBLIC HEARING: MISSION HILLS SENIOR HOUSING PUD AMENDMENT FOR CHILD DAY CARE, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND SUBDIVISION. Al-Jaff: Good evening Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. The subject site is located north of Highway 212, southeast of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and 860' Street. Just a brief background that we need to provide regarding the Mission Hills development. This will allow us to move forward with what is before you today. So back in 1994 the City approved a planned unit development that allowed 16 units of low density as well as medium density developments. There are townhomes that, thank you. There are townhomes, fourplexes located within the northwesterly portion and then the lower or the southerly portion of the site also has townhouses only it's a combination of six and eightplexes. The western portion of the site is commercial. The underlying zoning or the designation within the planned unit development allowed for commercial uses that are catering to neighborhood related daily needs. Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 One thing that we also need to point out is the total number of units, resident units that got built between the low density and the medium density districts were 212 and we'll get back to this number later. Also in 2015, which is only 2 years ago, City staff received an application that we took through the process. We brought it before the Planning Commission as well as City Council and the request was for a four story apartment building designated for seniors only. It was a combination of the memory care as well as assisted and independent living. We also had 9 twinhomes. This request was approved by the Planning Commission as well as City Council. To accommodate this request the City approved a planned unit development amendment, a site plan as well as a replat of an outlot. None of those documents got recorded with the County and approvals have lapsed since then. This will bring us to the proposal that is before you today. So let's start with the land use of the subject site. So the land use designation is mixed use. Within the mixed use category it is intended to accommodate either neighborhood commercial and/or high density residential development. Within the high density residential you can have up to 16 units per acre. The zoning of the site is planned unit development. It is, the planned unit development designates the site for commercial use but it also states that the commercial use has to be neighborhood related type of service. Amending the planned unit development to high density, to allow for high density residential within this area as well as accommodate a daycare which the applicant is proposing to be located inside the high density residential apartment building would be consistent with the land use of the subject site and staff is recommending approval of the planned unit development amendment. As far as the number of units that is being requested by the applicant. Earlier I went through the previous approvals from 1994 that included the low density as well as medium densities for this overall planned unit development. The site between the low density, medium densities could have accommodated 246 units. What actually was built 210 units so the remaining 36 units density can be transferred to the commercial portion which staff is recommending be amended to allow for high density residential. In addition to that this portion of the site has an area of 8.6 acres. Under the planned unit development and the zoning ordinance you're allowed 16 units per acre. That adds up to 138 units. With the transfer of density we would be able to accommodate 174 units, residential units. The applicant is requesting a total number of 152 units between the apartment building as well as townhouses that are being requested on the site which is under the maximum number permitted within this development. Within this acreage. Some of the characteristics of the site, this 8.6 acres have been farmed for many years. It has been graded. It falls within 1,000 feet of Lake Susan. The area that you see shaded in pink must comply with all ordinances associated with the Shoreland Overlay District. That means any building within that area may not exceed 35 feet in height. They need to maintain a 50 percent open space. There are other regulations. The location of the apartment building is completely outside the Shoreland Overlay District and is in compliance with the DNR requirements. The townhouses are two story only and they are in compliance with the height requirements. The overall open space for this site is 52 percent. Again we are in keeping with all ordinance requirements for the zoning ordinance and regulations to meet City requirements as well as DNR requirements. The daycare is proposed to be located inside the apartment building. One of the programs that the applicant is familiar with and I will let the applicant address this part, is the importance of and the success of intergenerational programs where you have children and seniors working together. I also need tc 2 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 • point out that intergenerational programs is one of the goals of the senior commission here in the City of Chanhassen and we have, we often have seniors that will go to daycare centers or elementary schools and just read to children and it has been a very successful program. The daycare is proposed to accommodate 90 children. Have an area of 8,600 square feet. The areas that we have circled on this slide are intended to be play areas. The portion that is along the southeast corner is intended to be the intergenerational play area. The portion that is to the north is for the children only. When you, we've worked with the applicant for quite a while and they've really done a good job ensuring that we have sidewalks throughout the development. Some of those sidewalks do connect with the trails. Circulation is for pedestrian versus vehicular traffic is very well designed. The vehicular traffic into the site or access into the site is gained off of 86a' Street and at this point I would like to turn it over to Alyson to address the traffic study. Fauske: 'Thank you Sharmeen. Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission, when this proposal originally came through there was a traffic study completed for the site assuming maximum buildout of the site. Maximum density so looking at the highest and most intense use from a traffic perspective. They looked at multiple things. For example the intersection of 101 and 86`" Street. The intersection of 86b Street and the proposed site access as well as internal circulation to the site. So working from 101 into the site the traffic study revealed that there were no decreases in level of service at that intersection. That it's not warranting any signalization or such at that intersection. Carver County has provided some comments that they would like to continue to monitor that intersection, looking at traffic volumes and seeing if there's any intersection improvements that might be needed in the future and the City is certainly willing to continue to cooperation with Carver County in their efforts for intersection improvements. Also as a result of that study looking at that intersection, one of the recommendations was to modify the median on West 86'h Street to provide for better channelization and then also to do some striping at the intersection so it's clear for the traffic existing onto 101 which lane they should use. Another thing to note on the site is a stop condition before vehicles enter onto West 86a' Street. Again that was a recommendation from the traffic study as well as when they looked at internal site circulation was to have a one way operation in front of the apartment building to facilitate the traffic through there. Thank you for pointing that out Sharmeen. Included in the packet are a couple communications from the homeowners association. The latest one was dated April 13, 2017 and there were 3 things that the HOA requested that we look at. First one being the median on West 861' Street which as I mentioned previously but there are some improvements recommended through there. In addition to the median improvements and when this proposal first came through with the council the council ended up approving no parking on the north side of West 86t' Street and that was to facilitate sight distances. The second comment within the HOA's current letter was the speed limit within 101 to be reduced. 101 being a County road it's their jurisdiction for that. 101 is, the use of 101, the classification and the design of 101 is for the current speed that's been posted there. Any changes to that we would leave to Carver County. At this point I don't anticipate that they would look at lowering the speed limit but just wanted to address that request that came through the HOA letter. And then the third one was taking a look at the car lights coming out of 3 Chanhassen Planning Comman — April 18, 2017 • the site onto West 86 s Street and doing some screening. Given the right-of-way in that area at this point staff is not making a recommendation to provide any screening but the homeowners association has certainly got some space and they do have a little bit of screening. They could certainly intensify that to help mitigate some of those headlights that would be coming from vehicles that are existing the site onto West 86'b Street. Summary of this traffic study is on page 17 and 18 and at the time of staff comments I would be more than happy to answer any questions that the commission has. Aller: Thank you. Al -Jaffa I just want to make a comment regarding the letter that Alyson was addressing. It arrived after the staff report went out and the homeowners association wanted to ensure that it was part of the record so we are including it. Aller: As always when we get these I typically will announce that we have received the correspondence. It is part of the record. It has been, have ample time at least tonight to read and review it and has been addressed by staff at this point and it will be included in the package that goes to City Council. Al -Jaffa Thank you. The design of the building is attractive. It has pronounced entrances. It utilizes durable exterior materials and it exhibits articulation. The materials are of high quality. It includes masonry, painted siding, exterior finish and insulation system of ENS and the structure will have sloped shingle roofs. The twinhomes design compliments each other yet each unit has it's own unique features such as shed or gabled roof. Tapered siding versus square columns. Standard garage doors versus doors with transom windows. Signage on the site. This is an area that is limited to one sign for this parcel. What the applicant has shown is a sign along 86" Street as well as a second one along Highway 101. Great Plains Boulevard. The sign is in a V shape which is permitted under the ordinance as long as it does not, as long as this angle does not exceed 45 degrees. In this case the applicant is proposing 30 degrees and the sign will be carrying the name of the development. It may not exceed 24 square feet nor 5 feet in height. There are multiple parks within the area. Bandimere Park, Chanhassen Hills Park and Lake Susan Park. You will notice that this is one lot only. Currently the outlot is being requested to be replatted into a lot. We will have technically 9 buildings on a single lot. Under the planned unit development ordinance you may have multiple buildings on a single lot. All of the units that will be on the site will be rental units. The applicant did have a neighborhood meeting and that was after the staff report went out and I'm sure he will be able to address some of the comments that were, concerns that were raised at the meeting. Staff is recommending approval of the planned unit development amendment, site plan as well as the preliminary plat approval with conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and we'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. Aller: Any questions based on staffs presentation at this time? Commissioner Madsen. M Chanhassen Planning • mission — April 18, 2017 • Madsen: I have a question for Alyson with regard to the traffic study. Just a question about the trips. So for example at a daycare center when a parent would drop off a child and there's one trip in and then they drive out. Is that just counted as one trip in or is that an in and out on the study or how is that accounted for? Fauske: It's by trip ends so that would constitute as two. Madsen: It would count, okay. Okay thank you. Fauske: You're welcomed. Aller: Any additional questions at this time? Hearing none if the applicant would like to come forward. They can state their name and address and representational capacity and tell us about your project. Mike Hoagberg: Hi, my name is Mike Hoagberg. I'm with Headwaters Development. I'm the President and we're in Lakeville, Minnesota. First off I'd like to thank you for your time and consideration of this project. It's good to finally be back in front of you guys. I know this has taken some time to come together but we really feel that we've incorporated a lot of the concerns, not only of the City and the community around it but different uses that we have been considering and really this plan is looking at one major modification from the first approval and that is the daycare center. As you may know we're working with Ebenezer who is one of the largest senior operators here in the State of Minnesota but a little lesser know, they are one of the larger operations of intergenerational programs throughout their communities and in fact they are award winning nationally on the programs that they've implemented with both seniors and children and what they've found is that it's a fantastic way to mix kind of that wisdom of the senior population and the energy of those children and that interaction is so beneficial for both the seniors and the children and in fact we call them grandfriends instead of grandparents and it's a really neat thing to see. It is in some of the communities that we're a part of as well as other communities that Ebenezer does operate so we're really excited about this. We think it's going to be great for this community and for this area. Furthermore we have heard the concerns from a couple of neighborhood meetings that we've had and from the letter from the HOA. We appreciate their support but we also appreciate their feedback and we are, we have looked at several different studies within this area and this corner and we are really considering different alternatives and I'll echo what Alyson was saying is that, you know I really want to go on record here to say that this is important to us. This intersection is really important to us and we understand the concerns and we're going to work with the City and the County to try to figure out what are the best solutions here and I think it might be a combination of some of the ideas that have been put forth and we'll work hard to make sure we come up with a good solution. So that is it, if you have any questions of me. Aller: Any questions? Chanhassen Planning CommiS310n — April 18, 2017 • Tietz: Yeah Mike? Mike Hoagberg: Yes. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Well regarding some of those options that are being considered. Would they have any impact on how the site would be developed or is it just a matter of where the entry road and how you deal with the entry road? Mike Hoagberg: Yeah so we would have no, right now none of the proposals would affect the actual site plan and development itself. It's more about making sure the queuing on 861 is proper and potentially looking at all the options for traffic control out on 101 and that comer. That left turn is pretty difficult. Tietz: Yeah it's kind of a blind comer. Mike Hoagberg: Yeah. Tietz: When you come around there. We take that turn off frequently off of 212 and you come up and traffic can move pretty rapidly along there and I think if you're trying to take a left off of 86a' to get onto 101 it's a challenge I think at times of day so yeah, anything that you all and the engineers and the County can do to make that a safer intersection would be I think greatly appreciated by everybody. Mike Hoagberg: That's important to us and we will continue to work with them for sure. Tietz: Good, thanks. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: I really like the intergenerational aspect of the facility and I've seen some of those in some of the senior facilities that I've visited and the ones that I've seen have had separate entrances for the daycare and the seniors and I'm wondering if it's a shared entrance here and how that flow will work. Mike Hoagberg: No it's a proposed separate entrance and so just outside, maybe you can't really see it on this one but just outside of, on that far right side of the building there is a separate entrance for daycare with a separate lobby for them to come in and it's a secured entrance as well so you don't have children running out it's secured in and the seniors is on the center part of the Property there. Now we've also designed the flow of the building that will allow on the center part of the building allow children in a secure way to come through the building to work with the 0 Chanhassen Planning • mission — April 18, 2017 • seniors and the seniors can flow back through without having to go outside and so it's a very specific design to promote that activity between the two. Madsen: Great, thank you. Mike Hoagberg: Yep. Aller: Based on those questions anything additional? Thank you sir. Mike Hoagberg: Thanks. Aller: At this time we'll open up the public hearing portion of this item so any individual here present who would like to come forward and speak their mind either for or against the proposal can do so. Thank you sir. Please state your name and address for the record. Doug Tucker: Hi, Doug Tucker, 585 Mission Hills Way West. Aller: Welcome Mr. Tucker. Doug Tucker: Thank you. Thank you for your time tonight. First off I would just like to say that I think seniors would be a great addition to the neighborhood and would make excellent neighbors. I do have a concern with the overall height of the structure, especially on the eastern most portion of the land. If we can get just the diagram up there again that would be great. It appears that on the eastern side where I live in those row of townhomes, if you go back to that other one that would be great. There doesn't appear to be much of a buffer between the eastern most part right there and the property line and that's just a bit concerning to me. Being that it's 4 stories it would be the largest building in the area and it's already on an elevated parcel of land so that's just a little bit concerning to me and I'd just ask the commission to take that into consideration with their plans. And that is all, thank you. Aller: Thank you sir. Any additional comments? Hearing no one come forward we'll go ahead and close the public hearing on this item. Open it up for commissioner comments and questions. I'm going to ask the height of the building hasn't changed or been modified since the last time it was before the commission? Aanenson: Yeah Sharmeen just indicated that it had been moved 65 feet back. We don't have the full landscaping plans here but we can double check that before it goes to City Council and maybe give a little bit more detail on that. Aller: Great, thank you. Any additional questions, comments? Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: I do have a question on the parking area. In the packet it indicates a certain number of spaces for the independent living and a certain number of spaces for the assisted living and, but Chanhassen Planning Concur on — April 18, 2017 • those units don't total up to the total units in the building so I'm just want to make sure we're accounting for all of them. Al-Jaff: The total, there will be. There are certain units that for every 3 units you need 1 parking space. There are also the memory care which does not require any parking spaces so that's why the numbers don't add up. Madsen: The number of units. Al-Jaff: The number of units doesn't add up but the math is accurate. Madsen: Okay so they're all considered. AI-Jaff: Yes. Madsen: Okay thank you. Al-Jaff: My apologies, I did not make that clear in the report when I did the calculations. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Audience: It was my understanding there's underground parking though too. Al-Jaff: There is. Aller: So the public hearing portion of the item was closed but for the record the comment was whether or not there existed parking, underground parking and that is in the plans as far as we've seen and it's available to the individuals that are residents there. Alright well based on the. Tietz: Yeah I just want to comment. It looks like an excellent project. You're to be commended I think for the inclusion of the youth and the children in a daycare facility. I think that's, as I get older too I think it's not a bad idea. My mother was in an Ebenezer structure in south Minneapolis for some time and I know that they're an excellent provider. I think it's going to be a great addition to the community and it's nice to see the independent of the free standing units on the site too. I know this has been always part of your plan but I think the incorporation of that and I look forward to the development. It's been an interesting parcel to watch for a few years and now it's exciting to see that this is going to actually going to take place. Aller: I think an intergenerational facet is spot on for what is needed here in this community and we're planning for lifetime here and it gives an opportunity for individuals to not only come in at the first home purchase or rental or just starting off their new life here in Chanhassen and move their way through to raising a family in single family housing and then have a location where they can not only reside but spend time with maybe grandchildren or friends or be exposed to Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 • that and stay right here in the community so I applaud them for that as well as for the effort. Although it took a little time to get here the effort to have the community hearings and to listen to them, to obviously commit to work with the City on traffic problems that might arise in the future is commendable so I look forward to the project. And I would entertain a motion if there's, I can't make a motion. Madsen: I'll make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of a planned unit development amendment to the existing standards Mission Hills PUD, Site Plan approval for the construction of 136 unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building, 8 twinhomes and a daycare center, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1 Block 1, Mission Hills 3Td Addition on property zoned Planned Unit Development and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard, Outlot E Mission Hills and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Randall: Second. Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussion? Madsen moved, Randall seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Mission Hills to allow High Density Use with a Childcare Center on the site and set standards for the structures as shown below with the following conditions, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact: 1. The site must comply with the DNR Shoreland Rules 2. The site shall comply with the following standards: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed 0 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 • Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the commercial development shall comply with the Neighborhood Business District, BN. Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3`d Addition shall comply with the R-12, High Density District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: Single Family Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential with a Child Daycare Center C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The High Density parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of-way and/ or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the High Density portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Commercial Residential Residential Commercial Street High Density Medium Density Parking Parking Building Setback* Building Setback Setback Setback* Highway 101 * 50' 20' Highway 212 * 50' 20' West 86d' Street * 30' 20' Interior Lot Lines O'(from commercial) 0' 0' 0' (from commercial) 50'(from residential) 35' (from residential) * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Boa Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 9' Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 10`s Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 11'h Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12's Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; 10 Chanhassen Planning • ission — April 18, 2017 • Mission Hills 2nd Addition: Mission Hills 3' Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Area: 376,358.4 square feet Width: 480 feet Depth: 620 feet BLOCK USE Net Lot Density Bard Surface Area Coverage Mission Hills 3' 152 Multi -Family Addition Units/Child Daycare 8.64 acres 17.5 50% Center Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi -Family 18 acres 7.66 37% Units Block 4, Mission Hills 56 Multi -Family Units 1 8.92 acres 6.28 43.2% RESIDENTIAL 1. Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. 6. The apartment building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition shall: a. Have pronounced entrance. b. Insure that all foundation walls are screened by landscaping or retaining walls. c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 • The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2Y2 inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f. Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be permitted for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3d Addition. 1. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in Signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 12 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 • 6. No illuminated signs within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3`a Addition may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. g. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3nd Addition shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Madsen moved, Randall seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3" Addition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. 13 • • 1-1- 08 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 2, 2017 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, Maryam Yusuf, Nancy Madsen, and Steve Weick MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Randall STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; and MacKenzie Walters, Planner PUBLIC HEARING: CAMP TANADOONA: REOUEST FOR A HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR A SIGN LOCATED AT 3300 TANADOONA DRIVE. Walters: This is Planning Case 2017-08. It's a sign variance request for Camp Tanadoona and they are requesting to be allowed to erect a 12.75 foot high ground low profile sign. The camp is located at the intersection of Hazeltine Boulevard and Tanadoona Drive. It's primarily surrounded by rural residential land use. There is the Westwood Community Church to the south and it's something of a unique use within the city and the approximate location of the sign is marked by the large red star. The applicant is mentioning, is proposing a 12.75 foot high ground low profile sign. This would be 7 % foot height variance. Typically signs in residential districts, monument signs are restricted to 5 feet. They would be staying within the code's 24 square feet of display area and they would have 2 foot banner mounts on top of it for temporary banners. That is included in the 12 % foot height. The big justification is there's a 7 foot elevation change from the location of the sign to the bed of the highway and vegetation in that area grows to around 8 feet tall so a 5 foot sign would be completely obscured and invisible essentially. As mentioned this is a unique use. It relies on the sign for a lot of it's advertising and also to direct out of town visitors to the site and it's also a pretty substantial distance from the intersection so they are requesting to change the location to a location that would actually be located on city property but it would be removing it from the right-of-way for Tanadoona Drive. So this is a diagram of the sign location. The current sign is 10 feet high and is located here. They are proposing moving it again out of this right-of-way to a location here. It would be approximately 91 feet from the center line of Highway 41 and 83 feet from the center line of Tanadoona Drive. We've spoken with the engineering department. It would be clear of any sight lines. They would need to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City to locate it on city property but that's not a problem administratively and doesn't actually require a variance. The variance would be entirely for the sign height. So again in summation just the existing sign has very limited visibility due to unique topography which is one of the criteria for issuing a sign variance. It's a unique use and has different needs than other uses located within residential Chanhassen Planning CoAssion — May 2, 2017 • districts which just tend to be sub development name or churches, things of that nature. The alignment and location of signs should not have a substantial use on the surrounding land uses. There are residential properties across the street but they're separated by Highway 41 and the sign is also angled narrow side towards them. It's not illuminated. There have been no complaints with the existing 10 foot sign and staff would recommend approval of this variance. I would happy to take any questions at this time. Aller: The existing 10 foot sign, does that have the 2 foot extension on it? Walters: That 10 foot is including the 2 foot extension. It's 8 feet and then with the 2 foot banner mounts. Aller: And by not being in the triangle, sight triangle then we're fairly certain that there are no safety issues as a result of the place of the sign. Walters: Engineering looked it over. Their only condition was they wanted language in the encroachment agreement that if the alignment of the highway were ever to change and safety issues were to emerge we could require it to relocate but given the current location of the highway they were not concerned. Aller: It's a conforming use now? Non -conforming use. Walters: Yep. Aller: And so if they were to, if they were to stop running the camp would that use seize? And therefore the sign be taken down. Walters: I will defer to the Development Director on that one. Aanenson: So it is a legal non -conforming use. That's a good question. That could be a condition you put that maybe it runs with the camp site and that another use would come forward. I think a couple of things that MacKenzie didn't mention is we looked at the pole standards themselves. Trying to get them to be kind of architecturally more woodsy kind of instead of just a straight pole. It's not lit so it fits into that so I think anybody else going out there would want a different type of use but that is a good question and I think we can, if you so choose we could add a condition on there that it ties specifically to Camp Tanadoona. Aller: Alright, thank you. Any other questions based on my questions or the presentation? Seeing none if the applicant would like to come forward. If you could state your name and address for the record sir. Justin Schweigert: My name is Justin Schweigert and I work for Campfire Minnesota located, we manage Camp Tanadoona which is located at 3300 Tanadoona Drive. 2 Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 2, 2017 • Aller: Welcome. Justin Schweigert: Thank you. So essentially MacKenzie covered a lot of why we would like a variance for the sign. One of the problems we have in the summertime is the vegetation. Last year I measured at around 8 feet so it obstructs a good portion of our sign making it obstructed to parents dropping off you know children for day camp and also for other rental groups that attend Camp Tanadoona. The other thing is given the proximity north of the drive it does tend to confuse some of our users, especially if they're coming from the south. A lot of times they pass Tanadoona Drive before they realize where they're supposed to turn to reach the camp so those are the main two reasons we would like a variance to increase the height of the sign and also change the location. Aller: Great. Any questions for the applicant at this point in time? Seeing none. Thank you very much sir. Appreciate it. Justin Schweigert: Thank you. Aller: At this point I'll open up the public hearing portion of this item. Any person wishing to come forward and speak either for or against the item before us can do so. Seeing no one come forward I'll close the public hearing portion of the item and open it up for discussion amongst the commissioners. Tietz: It looks like a good solution. Weick: It makes sense. Aller: Pretty straight forward. I think the applicant's taken into consideration several items. Not only am I not concerned about the placement of this sign for present, if it's changed, having safety concerns but I think it addresses some of the safety concerns in parents and individuals driving by looking. Trying to stop. Having to relocate or try to think about how they're going to alter their path so I think it actually will save some safety concerns and address those. Madsen: Will we tie it to the Camp Tanadoona use? Aller: I think it should be because it's going to be on city property and. Aanenson: Yeah I was going to say there's actually probably two ways to approach it. One they're doing an encroachment agreement to our property so as part of the encroachment agreement we would maybe put on there that it would be tied and that might be the more appropriate place to tie that, the encroachment agreement to that site. I think the only reason it would move, the sign as MacKenzie has stated if there's a realignment. Whether it's Tanadoona or 41 because it is a regional draw. People are looking to see the queuing that were to go in so I 91 Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 2, 2017 • think we can either add it, you give us direction and we'll find the appropriate place to either put it in the encroachment agreement that is tied to Camp Tanadoona or the conditions of approval. Aller: I think that's probably an appropriate place because it's tied then to the city use. Aanenson: Yeah. Tietz: Andrew? Aller: Yes. Tietz: Kate, if the property did sell some time in the future and became residential property, if that sign is on city property it would, it wouldn't transfer anyhow would it? Aanenson: I wouldn't think so. That's what I'm saying. I think that's probably the appropriate place to put it is the encroachment agreement. I would agree. Tietz: Right, right, okay. Just want to clarify. Aller: Any further discussion? Okay I'll entertain a motion if there is one to be made. Madsen: I will make a motion. Aller: Thank you. Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the variance request to allow a 7.75 foot height variance for a monument sign for Camp Tanadoona located at 3300 Tanadoona Drive subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Undestad: Second. Yusuf: Second. Aller: Having a valid motion and second, any further discussion? Madsen moved, Undestad seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the variance request to allow a 7.75 foot height variance for a monument sign for Camp Tanadoona located at 3300 Tanadoona Drive subject to the following conditions and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: 0 Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 2, 2017 • 1. The sign's height measured from grade shall not exceed 12.75 feet, including temporary banner mounts. 2. The sign shall be constructed with individual pole wraps to minimize the visual impact of it's supports. 3. The sign shall be a minimum of 45 feet from the northern edge of Tanadoona Drive and a minimum of 10 feet west of the Highway 41 right-of-way. 4. The applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement with the City in order to locate the ground low profile sign on city property. This encroachment agreement shall include language stating that if Highway 41 and/or Tanadoona Drive are widened the City can require the sign to be moved or removed if the sign's location impedes sight lines. The applicant must apply for and receive the required sign permits from the City. 6. The ground low profile sign must meet the sign code's design criteria. 7. Temporary banners may only be displayed from January I" to September 30a'. 8. Temporary banners must be maintained in good repair. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: 3622 RED CEDAR POINT ROAD: REOUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR A GARAGE ROOF HEIGHT. Walters: Alright this is Planning Case 2017-09. 3622 Red Cedar Point Road variance. The applicant is requesting to intensify a non -conforming garage by increasing it's height by 2 feet. It's located at 3622 Red Cedar Point. This area is zoned residential. Typical zoning is a 20,000 square foot lot. 30 foot front yard setbacks. 10 foot side yard setbacks. 25 percent hard cover and residential buildings are limited to 35 feet in height in this zoning area. As I mentioned this is a non -conforming use. I was not able to ascertain the date of the original, original house but I believe it was in the mid 60's. That house is shown in, ob I'm sorry it cleared my pointer on me. In red here. In 1983 that house was demolished but the original detached garages were allowed, were kept so those are non -conforming uses that are located within the front yard setback and side yard setback. When the new house was built in 1983 it was attached to one of the existing detached garages and the existing conditions on the property are the pre-existing garages are in blue here and you can see here where this one's in the front yard setback and this area in red is the section that requires the height variance. The applicant is allowed to replace any non- conforming structure at it's current intensity. However because they are proposing to increase the height of the garage that is in the side and front yard setback they require a variance because Chanhassen Planning Comission — May 2, 2017 • it's intensifying the non -conformity. They will not be encroaching more into the setback but it will be taller within the setback. So the proposed project is increasing the height of the garage to 15.5 feet. That's a 2 foot increase in height. The goal of doing this is to allow them to replace the existing 7 foot high garage doors with 8 foot high garage doors. As I mentioned this isn't going to increase the encroachment to the setback. It's just the height of the structure. The applicant has stated they need 8 foot high garage doors to allow them to park taller vehicles within the garage and to store larger accessory vehicles. Essentially as time's gone on vehicles have gotten larger and the original garage height is no longer sufficient. You can see there's a little bit of a height differential between this section which was the original detached garage and the part that was built in 1983. The other purpose of raising is going to be to even out that roof line. This center section would increase by one foot. This section would increase by two feet. And then over here on the left is just a full scope of work they're doing. Most of this does not require the variance but just to provide some context. They will be removing a non -conforming structure in a shed, deck and patio back here and stairs here which will decrease the property's non -conforming hard cover. I believe this one is being rebuilt exactly as it was and then as I mentioned this section is going to be expanded and this addition is legal and within code and does not require a variance. The proposed height is significantly less than would theoretically be allowed by city code for the region were outside the setbacks. Residential garage doors are typically 7 or 8 feet. Most new houses, maybe not most. A lot of new houses are going in with 8 foot garage doors so it's not an unreasonable or atypical garage door size. As the applicant noted larger vehicles cannot fit under the 7 foot garage doors. The city code does not restrict garage door height within residential districts. In theory individuals can put in 12 foot garage doors if they choose. Regarding the general neighborhood. It's one of the oldest neighborhoods in the city. Many properties are non -conforming. I was able to find 12 variances granted for 29 properties within 500 square feet and staff recommends approval of this variance. If you have any questions I'd be happy to answer them at this time. Aller: Any questions for staff at this point? Seeing none we'll go ahead and ask the applicant to come forward. If you could state your name and address for the record sir. Steve Keuseman: Yeah I'm Steve Keuseman. I've lived at 3622 Red Cedar Point Road for on and off for 54 years. Aller: Welcome. Tell us about your project. Steve Keuseman: We're actually remodeling the whole house and we're rebuilding the garages because as he stated that one garage that we want the new roof on, well it's going to be a new garage and with the additional height. That garage was built in about 1965. My father built that and you know back then the existing vehicles were a lot lower than they are now. Like my son has a Suburban that has roof racks on it. We can barely get that in the garage. And if you can get it in the garage you can't even hardly jack it up to change your oil so that's part of the reason why we need the height. Plus you know if you're carrying a ladder or 2 by 4 or something you just you know bang, you hit the light in the ceiling and that and so that's part of it. And then it'd Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 2, 2017 • just be a lot nicer for things. My son has a boat also that he backs in the garage and has a wakeboard tower on it. He can't put his wakeboard tower up in the garage so like if he wants to get in the boat and clean it out, take things in or out or something, he can't lift the tower up in the garage. He couldn't put it, he'd have to have about a 10 foot door, high door to back it in with the tower up. But he'd just like to be able to put it up once it's in the garage you know. Like I say we've lived there for 54 years and my son is going to, my son and his wife are going to live there also because we have like a full apartment downstairs. We built in '84. We built it that way at that time and we wanted my parents were going to live downstairs and I was going to take care of my parents in their later years. Well unfortunately things didn't work out that way and but hopefully it will work out that way now and we plan on living there another 54 years so we really like the area. We like Chanhassen so we'd just like 2 more feet in the garage you know in the height. Aller: We love Chanhassen too sir. Just for the record your son is not going to live in the garage right? Steve Keuseman: No, no, no, no, no. Aller: Just when he's in hot water. Steve Keuseman: You want to talk Matthew? Okay no. And by the way he is a Captain on the fire department here in Chan. Aller: Awesome, thank you. Steve Keuseman: So I don't know Bob do you want to say anything? Bob Mattson: They pretty much said it. Steve Keuseman: Yeah I didn't really have to say anything. The gentleman over here pretty much said all I want to say. I think my son's wife actually sent in a letter saying the reasons why we wanted to do this you know. Aller: Great. Steve Keuseman: And it's not for, we don't have any ulterior motives. We just want a little more height in the ceiling you know. Aller: Awesome, well thank you very much sir. Steve Keuseman: Yeah thank you. 7 Chanhassen Planning Comssion — May 2, 2017 • Aller: Any questions? None. Alright we'll open up the public hearing portion of this item. Anyone wishing to come forward to speak for or against the request can do so at this time. Seeing no one coming forward to speak we'll close the public hearing and open it up for discussion. Weick: It's a good project. Tietz: Andrew it looks like, if I may ask the gentleman, the owner. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: It looks like where the excavation where you took out that free standing garage closest to the road. Steve Keuseman: Yeah. Tietz: It looks like you found a little bit of rubble under there. Steve Keuseman: Well yeah, yeah. It bad the old walls where they were rock and cement. Tietz: Yeah. Steve Keuseman: Yeah so. Tietz: Yeah it looks like you ran into some interesting things there. Steve Keuseman: Oh yeah. See my dad, a lot of the stuff that was in there was from my father so we had, and the foundation wasn't safe. I didn't want, see there was a basement. There's a basement under that garage. Tietz: Oh there was. Steve Keuseman: And we're going to rebuild it with a basement under it so on top we can store a car and underneath we can put our lawnmowers and stuff. Tietz: Interesting, okay. Aller: Thank you. Tietz: Thank you yeah. Aller: Any additional questions based on Commissioner Tietz' question? No, okay. Any comments? I think it's a great project. I think it's certainly limiting itself to the needs of the Chanhassen Planning Co • ssion — May 2, 2017 • applicant which is what we always want to do when granting a variance so I would be voting in favor. Any other comments? Would someone like to make a motion? Yusuf: I can do it. Aller: Commissioner Yusuf. Yusuf. The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance request to allow an intensification of an existing non -conforming use by raising the attached garage height to 15.5 feet within the required front and side yard setbacks, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Weick: Second. Undestad: Second. Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussion? Yusuf moved, Weick seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance request to allow an intensification of an existing non -conforming use by raising the attached garage height to 15.5 feet within the required front and side yard setbacks, subject to the following conditions and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Aller: Good luck sir. Steve Keuseman: Thank you. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commission Yusuf noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated April 18, 2017 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aller: City Council action update. Chanhassen Planning CoAssion — May 2, 2017 • Aanenson: Well we didn't have any items that went to the last City Council meeting. I just remind everybody next Monday we're having the 50t° Anniversary of the City so that's going to be right out here in front of City Hall so anybody that wants to come to that 5:30 and cake and sandwiches and a ceremony. Aller: And that invitation is not only to the Planning Commission but those of you at home as well. Aanenson: Right. Yusuf: Isn't there a weather permitting comment. Aanenson: Yeah, yeah. If it's raining they'll come inside but right now it says 69 and sunny so. Yusuf. Awesome. Aller: It's always 69 and sunny here. Aanenson: Exactly, perfect. Just take a minute to go through the Planning Commission upcoming items. Aller: Please. Aanenson: We have scheduled for the May 166, your next meeting is the Avienda. We've talked to the applicant about that. There's some issues that I'm not sure we've got enough detail to continue with the report so we've asked for some additional time. I'm not sure where we are on that so we'll let you know. If not we didn't schedule anything for the comp plan because we figured that would take quite a bit of time so if that does move we will let you know as soon as possible. Hopefully we'll know by tomorrow and then we would move that to the June 6' meeting. Therefore we'd probably move some of those other land use items down. We are working on the Frontier project. Sharmeen Al-Jaff is working on that. I think the architecture is coming together really nice so you'll see that with the Aldi. That also may bump down a meeting. We had that scheduled for the June 6's but that may bump down. We'll find out. Their submittal date is this Friday so we'll keep you posted on that. And then also the Klingelhutz property. We have a good project on there. A townhouse project so I think that will also be coming in potentially June 20's so you've got a couple of big meetings coming up here. And as I stated before we're trying to supplement, put some of the chapters in and get you up to speed on those before we have some public comment as we move to July and August and then have some, take those out to National Night Out and the 4'b of July so we'll be trying to get your more information on that. So that's all I have right now. Those are the bigger projects that are coming in. MacKenzie might have a couple other variances coming forward so that's it and I'll keep you posted on upcoming agendas. 10 Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 2, 2017 • Aller: Great, thank you. Any further items? Seeing none and hearing none I'll entertain a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Weick moved to adjourn the meeting. Chairman Aller stated it was non - debatable. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 11 ►-7-off CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Mission Hills Senior Living for the following: 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards — Mission Hills. 2. Preliminary Plat to replat 8.64 acres into one lot— Mission Hills 3' Addition. 3. Site Plan Review for the construction of a 136-unit Senior Housing Facility with a Child Daycare Center and 8 Twin Homes — Mission Hills Senior Living. On April 18, 2017, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Mission Hills Senior Living for a Planned Unit Development Amendment, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan review (Planning Case 2017-07). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use, PUD-Mixed Use. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Mixed Use. 3. The legal description of the property is shown on the attached Exhibit A. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. SCANNED e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; 0 The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2. Lack of adequate roads. 3. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 6. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted. b) Consistency with this division. c) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas. 2 d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development. e) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community. 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping. 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses. 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 7. The planning report #2017-07, dated April 18, 2017, prepared by Shanneen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development Amendment to the Mission Hills PUD, Preliminary Plat for Mission Hills 3'a Addition, and Site Plan for Mission Hills Senior Living. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 18m day of April, 2017. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized NOTICE OF PUBLIC agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- HEARING lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: PLANNING CASE NO.2017-07 NOTICE IS hassenHEREBY GIVEN (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal that the Chanhassen Planning newspaper,as ovided b Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as Commission will hold a public Pr Y hearing on Tuesday, April 18, amended. 2017 at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said purpose of this hearing is to Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of consider a request for PUD the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both Amendment, Subdivision and inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition Site Plan Review with Variances fora 136-unit senior housing and publication of the Notice: structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and abcdefghijkhnnopq daycare center acres o Planned I I property zoned Plannenne d Unit D Development (PUD) located at B600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlet BY E, Mission Hills). Applicant: IatmeA. Hartmann Sperides Refiners Architects, Inc. Owner: Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC. A plan showing the location Subscribed and sworn before me on of the proposal is available for public review on the city's web site at www.ci.chanhassen. mn.us/2017-07 or at City Hall this JL�_dayof2017 during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with JYMME JEANNETTE BARK respect to this proposal. Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior NG'AMiMCN MRSNE01131 Planner N ublic ,. 4ryGbMMi$SIUaFJflESQ1/31I'.B Email: saljaff@ci.chanhaswn. mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday. April 6, 201T No 4438) RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.59 per column inch SCANNF,) I�4- (A-- CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING APRIL 18, 2017 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, John Tietz, Maryam Yusuf, Nancy Madsen, and Mark Randall MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad, and Steve Weick STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; Bob Generous, Senior Planner, MacKenzie Walters, Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Mike Hoagberg Joy Gorra Dale Hetland Duane Moon Carol Dunmore Char and Bill Schubert Karla Thomson Teri Byrne Gary Halona - Maryanne Dr. Carissa Haverly Doug Tucker 17550 Hemlock Avenue, Lakeville 1680 West 781s Street 542 Mission Hill Drive 536 Mission Hill Drive 730 West 961s Street 9610 Meadowlark Lane 8524 Mayfield Court 700 West 96s' Street 670 Creekwood Street 750 West 96'h Street 585 Mission Hills Way West PUBLIC HEARING: MISSION HILLS SENIOR HOUSING PUD AMENDMENT FOR CHILD DAY CARE, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND SUBDIVISION. A]-Jaff: Good evening Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. The subject site is located north of Highway 212, southeast of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and 86's Street. Just a brief background that we need to provide regarding the Mission Hills development. This will allow us to move forward with what is before you today. So back in 1994 the City approved a planned unit development that allowed 16 units of low density as well as medium density developments. There are townhomes that, thank you. There are townhomes, fourplexes located within the northwesterly portion and then the lower or the southerly portion of the site also has townhouses only it's a combination of six and eightplexes. The western portion of the site is commercial. The underlying zoning or the designation within the planned unit development allowed for commercial uses that are catering to neighborhood related daily needs. Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 One thing that we also need to point out is the total number of units, resident units that got built between the low density and the medium density districts were 212 and we'll get back to this number later. Also in 2015, which is only 2 years ago, City staff received an application that we took through the process. We brought it before the Planning Commission as well as City Council and the request was for a four story apartment building designated for seniors only. It was a combination of the memory care as well as assisted and independent living. We also had 9 twinhomes. This request was approved by the Planning Commission as well as City Council. To accommodate this request the City approved a planned unit development amendment, a site plan as well as a replat of an outlot. None of those documents got recorded with the County and approvals have lapsed since then. This will bring us to the proposal that is before you today. So let's start with the land use of the subject site. So the land use designation is mixed use. Within the mixed use category it is intended to accommodate either neighborhood commercial and/or high density residential development. Within the high density residential you can have up to 16 units per acre. The zoning of the site is planned unit development. It is, the planned unit development designates the site for commercial use but it also states that the commercial use has to be neighborhood related type of service. Amending the planned unit development to high density, to allow for high density residential within this area as well as accommodate a daycare which the applicant is proposing to be located inside the high density residential apartment building would be consistent with the land use of the subject site and staff is recommending approval of the planned unit development amendment. As far as the number of units that is being requested by the applicant. Earlier I went through the previous approvals from 1994 that included the low density as well as medium densities for this overall planned unit development. The site between the low density, medium densities could have accommodated 246 units. What actually was built 210 units so the remaining 36 units density can be transferred to the commercial portion which staff is recommending be amended to allow for high density residential. In addition to that this portion of the site has an area of 8.6 acres. Under the planned unit development and the zoning ordinance you're allowed 16 units per acre. That adds up to 138 units. With the transfer of density we would be able to accommodate 174 units, residential units. The applicant is requesting a total number of 152 units between the apartment building as well as townhouses that are being requested on the site which is under the maximum number permitted within this development. Within this acreage. Some of the characteristics of the site, this 8.6 acres have been farmed for many years. It has been graded. It falls within 1,000 feet of Lake Susan. The area that you see shaded in pink must comply with all ordinances associated with the Shoreland Overlay District. That means any building within that area may not exceed 35 feet in height. They need to maintain a 50 percent open space. There are other regulations. The location of the apartment building is completely outside the Shoreland Overlay District and is in compliance with the DNR requirements. The townhouses are two story only and they are in compliance with the height requirements. The overall open space for this site is 52 percent. Again we are in keeping with all ordinance requirements for the zoning ordinance and regulations to meet City requirements as well as DNR requirements. The daycare is proposed to be located inside the apartment building. One of the programs that the applicant is familiar with and I will let the applicant address this part, is the importance of and the success of intergenerational programs where you have children and seniors working together. I also need to 2 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 point out that intergenerational programs is one of the goals of the senior commission here in the City of Chanhassen and we have, we often have seniors that will go to daycare centers or elementary schools and just read to children and it has been a very successful program. The daycare is proposed to accommodate 90 children. Have an area of 8,600 square feet. The areas that we have circled on this slide are intended to be play areas. The portion that is along the southeast comer is intended to be the intergenerational play area. The portion that is to the north is for the children only. Wben you, we've worked with the applicant for quite a while and they've really done a good job ensuring that we have sidewalks throughout the development. Some of those sidewalks do connect with the trails. Circulation is for pedestrian versus vehicular traffic is very well designed. The vehicular traffic into the site or access into the site is gained off of 86' Street and at this point I would like to turn it over to Alyson to address the traffic study. Fauske: Thank you Sharmeen. Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission, when this proposal originally came through there was a traffic study completed for the site assuming maximum buildout of the site. Maximum density so looking at the highest and most intense use from a traffic perspective. They looked at multiple things. For example the intersection of 101 and 86`" Street. The intersection of 86'b Street and the proposed site access as well as internal circulation to the site. So working from 101 into the site the traffic study revealed that there were no decreases in level of service at that intersection. That it's not warranting any signalization or such at that intersection. Carver County has provided some comments that they would like to continue to monitor that intersection, looking at traffic volumes and seeing if there's any intersection improvements that might be needed in the future and the City is certainly willing to continue to cooperation with Carver County in their efforts for intersection improvements. Also as a result of that study looking at that intersection, one of the recommendations was to modify the median on West 86' Street to provide for better channelization and then also to do some striping at the intersection so it's clear for the traffic existing onto 101 which lane they should use. Another thing to note on the site is a stop condition before vehicles enter onto West 861' Street. Again that was a recommendation from the traffic study as well as when they looked at internal site circulation was to have a one way operation in front of the apartment building to facilitate the traffic through there. Thank you for pointing that out Sharmeen. Included in the packet are a couple communications from the homeowners association. The latest one was dated April 13, 2017 and there were 3 things that the HOA requested that we look at. First one being the median on West 86'h Street which as I mentioned previously but there are some improvements recommended through there. In addition to the median improvements and when this proposal first came through with the council the council ended up approving no parking on the north side of West 86`s Street and that was to facilitate sight distances. The second comment within the HOA's current letter was the speed limit within 101 to be reduced. 101 being a County road it's their jurisdiction for that. 101 is, the use of 101, the classification and the design of 101 is for the current speed that's been posted there. Any changes to that we would leave to Carver County. At this point I don't anticipate that they would look at lowering the speed limit but just wanted to address that request that came through the HOA letter. And then the third one was taking a look at the car lights coming out of 3 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 the site onto West 86`s Street and doing some screening. Given the right-of-way in that area at this point staff is not making a recommendation to provide any screening but the homeowners association has certainly got some space and they do have a little bit of screening. They could certainly intensify that to help mitigate some of those headlights that would be coming from vehicles that are existing the site onto West 86`s Street. Summary of this traffic study is on page 17 and 18 and at the time of staff comments I would be more than happy to answer any questions that the commission has. Aller: Thank you. Al -Jaffa I just want to make a comment regarding the letter that Alyson was addressing. It arrived after the staff report went out and the homeowners association wanted to ensure that it was part of the record so we are including it. Aller: As always when we get these I typically will announce that we have received the correspondence. It is part of the record. It has been, have ample time at least tonight to read and review it and has been addressed by staff at this point and it will be included in the package that goes to City Council. Al-Jaff: Thank you. The design of the building is attractive. It has pronounced entrances. It utilizes durable exterior materials and it exhibits articulation. The materials are of high quality. It includes masonry, painted siding, exterior finish and insulation system of EIFS and the structure will have sloped shingle roofs. The twinhomes design compliments each other yet each unit has it's own unique features such as shed or gabled roof. Tapered siding versus square columns. Standard garage doors versus doors with transom windows. Signage on the site. This is an area that is limited to one sign for this parcel. What the applicant has shown is a sign along 86a' Street as well as a second one along Highway 101. Great Plains Boulevard. The sign is in a V shape which is permitted under the ordinance as long as it does not, as long as this angle does not exceed 45 degrees. In this case the applicant is proposing 30 degrees and the sign will be carrying the name of the development. It may not exceed 24 square feet nor 5 feet in height. There are multiple parks within the area. Bandimere Park, Chanhassen Hills Park and Lake Susan Park. You will notice that this is one lot only. Currently the outlot is being requested to be replatted into a lot. We will have technically 9 buildings on a single lot. Under the planned unit development ordinance you may have multiple buildings on a single lot. All of the units that will be on the site will be rental units. The applicant did have a neighborhood meeting and that was after the staff report went out and I'm sure he will be able to address some of the comments that were, concerns that were raised at the meeting. Staff is recommending approval of the planned unit development amendment, site plan as well as the preliminary plat approval with conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and we'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. Aller: Any questions based on staffs presentation at this time? Commissioner Madsen. 4 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 Madsen: I have a question for Alyson with regard to the traffic study. Just a question about the trips. So for example at a daycare center when a parent would drop off a child and there's one trip in and then they drive out. Is that just counted as one trip in or is that an in and out on the study or how is that accounted for? Fauske: It's by trip ends so that would constitute as two. Madsen: It would count, okay. Okay thank you. Fauske: You're welcomed. Aller: Any additional questions at this time? Hearing none if the applicant would like to come forward. They can state their name and address and representational capacity and tell us about your project. Mike Hoagberg: Hi, my name is Mike Hoagberg. I'm with Headwaters Development. I'm the President and we're in Lakeville, Minnesota. First off I'd like to thank you for your time and consideration of this project. It's good to finally be back in front of you guys. I know this has taken some time to come together but we really feel that we've incorporated a lot of the concerns, not only of the City and the community around it but different uses that we have been considering and really this plan is looking at one major modification from the first approval and that is the daycare center. As you may know we're working with Ebenezer who is one of the largest senior operators here in the State of Minnesota but a little lesser know, they are one of the larger operations of intergenerational programs throughout their communities and in fact they are award winning nationally on the programs that they've implemented with both seniors and children and what they've found is that it's a fantastic way to mix kind of that wisdom of the senior population and the energy of those children and that interaction is so beneficial for both the seniors and the children and in fact we call them grandfriends instead of grandparents and it's a really neat thing to see. It is in some of the communities that we're a part of as well as other communities that Ebenezer does operate so we're really excited about this. We think it's going to be great for this community and for this area. Furthermore we have heard the concerns from a couple of neighborhood meetings that we've had and from the letter from the HOA. We appreciate their support but we also appreciate their feedback and we are, we have looked at several different studies within this area and this comer and we are really considering different alternatives and I'll echo what Alyson was saying is that, you know I really want to go on record here to say that this is important to us. This intersection is really important to us and we understand the concerns and we're going to work with the City and the County to try to figure out what are the best solutions here and I think it might be a combination of some of the ideas that have been put forth and we'll work hard to make sure we come up with a good solution. So that is it, if you have any questions of me. Aller: Any questions? Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 Tietz: Yeah Mike? Mike Hoagberg: Yes. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Well regarding some of those options that are being considered. Would they have any impact on how the site would be developed or is it just a matter of where the entry road and how you deal with the entry road? Mike Hoagberg: Yeah so we would have no, right now none of the proposals would affect the actual site plan and development itself. It's more about making sure the queuing on 86' is proper and potentially looking at all the options for traffic control out on 101 and that corner. That left turn is pretty difficult. Tietz: Yeah it's kind of a blind comer. Mike Hoagberg: Yeah. Tietz: When you come around there. We take that turn off frequently off of 212 and you come up and traffic can move pretty rapidly along there and I think if you're trying to take a left off of 86`s to get onto 101 it's a challenge I think at times of day so yeah, anything that you all and the engineers and the County can do to make that a safer intersection would be I think greatly appreciated by everybody. Mike Hoagberg: That's important to us and we will continue to work with them for sure. Tietz: Good, thanks. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: I really like the intergenerational aspect of the facility and I've seen some of those in some of the senior facilities that I've visited and the ones that I've seen have had separate entrances for the daycare and the seniors and I'm wondering if it's a shared entrance here and how that flow will work. Mike Hoagberg: No it's a proposed separate entrance and so just outside, maybe you can't really see it on this one but just outside of, on that far right side of the building there is a separate entrance for daycare with a separate lobby for them to come in and it's a secured entrance as well so you don't have children running out it's secured in and the seniors is on the center part of the property there. Now we've also designed the flow of the building that will allow on the center part of the building allow children in a secure way to come through the building to work with the 1.1 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 seniors and the seniors can flow back through without having to go outside and so it's a very specific design to promote that activity between the two. Madsen: Great, thank you. Mike Hoagberg: Yep. Aller: Based on those questions anything additional? Thank you sir. Mike Hoagberg: Thanks. Aller: At this time we'll open up the public hearing portion of this item so any individual here present who would like to come forward and speak their mind either for or against the proposal can do so. Thank you sir. Please state your name and address for the record. Doug Tucker: Hi, Doug Tucker, 585 Mission Hills Way West. Aller: Welcome Mr. Tucker. Doug Tucker: Thank you. Thank you for your time tonight. First off I would just like to say that I think seniors would be a great addition to the neighborhood and would make excellent neighbors. I do have a concern with the overall height of the structure, especially on the eastern most portion of the land. If we can get just the diagram up there again that would be great. It appears that on the eastern side where I live in those row of townbomes, if you go back to that other one that would be great. There doesn't appear to be much of a buffer between the eastern most part right there and the property line and that's just a bit concerning to me. Being that it's 4 stories it would be the largest building in the area and it's already on an elevated parcel of land so that's just a little bit concerning to me and I'd just ask the commission to take that into consideration with their plans. And that is all, thank you. Aller: Thank you sir. Any additional comments? Hearing no one come forward we'll go ahead and close the public hearing on this item. Open it up for commissioner comments and questions. I'm going to ask the height of the building hasn't changed or been modified since the last time it was before the commission? Aanenson: Yeah Sharmeen just indicated that it had been moved 65 feet back. We don't have the full landscaping plans here but we can double check that before it goes to City Council and maybe give a little bit more detail on that. Aller: Great, thank you. Any additional questions, comments? Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: I do have a question on the parking area. In the packet it indicates a certain number of spaces for the independent living and a certain number of spaces for the assisted living and, but 7 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 those units don't total up to the total units in the building so I'm just want to make sure we're accounting for all of them. Al-Jaff: The total, there will be. There are certain units that for every 3 units you need 1 parking space. There are also the memory care which does not require any parking spaces so that's why the numbers don't add up. Madsen: The number of units. Al-Jaff: The number of units doesn't add up but the math is accurate. Madsen: Okay so they're all considered. Al-Jaff: Yes. Madsen: Okay thank you. A]-Jaff: My apologies, I did not make that clear in the report when I did the calculations. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Audience: It was my understanding there's underground parking though too. Al-Jaff: There is. Aller: So the public hearing portion of the item was closed but for the record the comment was whether or not there existed parking, underground parking and that is in the plans as far as we've seen and it's available to the individuals that are residents there. Alright well based on the. Tietz: Yeah I just want to comment. It looks like an excellent project. You're to be commended I think for the inclusion of the youth and the children in a daycare facility. I think that's, as I get older too I think it's not a bad idea. My mother was in an Ebenezer structure in south Minneapolis for some time and I know that they're an excellent provider. I think it's going to be a great addition to the community and it's nice to see the independent of the free standing units on the site too. I know this has been always part of your plan but I think the incorporation of that and I look forward to the development. It's been an interesting parcel to watch for a few years and now it's exciting to see that this is going to actually going to take place. Allen. I think an intergenerational facet is spot on for what is needed here in this community and we're planning for lifetime here and it gives an opportunity for individuals to not only come in at the first home purchase or rental or just starting off their new life here in Chanhassen and move their way through to raising a family in single family housing and then have a location where they can not only reside but spend time with maybe grandchildren or friends or be exposed to Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 that and stay right here in the community so I applaud them for that as well as for the effort. Although it took a little time to get here the effort to have the community hearings and to listen to them, to obviously commit to work with the City on traffic problems that might arise in the future is commendable so I look forward to the project. And I would entertain a motion if there's, I can't make a motion. Madsen: I'll make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of a planned unit development amendment to the existing standards Mission Hills PUD, Site Plan approval for the construction of 136 unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building, 8 twinhomes and a daycare center, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1 Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition on property zoned Planned Unit Development and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard, Outlot E Mission Hills and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Randall: Second. Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussion? Madsen moved, Randall seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Mission Hills to allow High Density Use with a Childcare Center on the site and set standards for the structures as shown below with the following conditions, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact: 1. The site must comply with the DNR Shoreland Rules 2. The site shall comply with the following standards: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the commercial development shall comply with the Neighborhood Business District, BN. Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'a Addition shall comply with the R-12, High Density District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: Single Family Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential with a Child Daycare Center C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The High Density parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of-way and/ or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the High Density portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Commercial Residential Residential Commercial Street High Density Medium Density Parking Parking Building Setback* Building Setback Setback Setback* Highway 101 * 50' 20' Highway 212 * 50, 20' West 861h Street * 30' 20' O'(from commercial) 0' 0' 0' (from commercial) Interior Lot Lines 50'(from residential) 35' (from residential) * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 91s Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 10`s Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 11'" Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12t° Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; 10 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 Mission Hills 21 Addition: Mission Hills 3`d Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Area: 376,358.4 square feet Width: 480 feet Depth: 620 feet BLOCK USE Net Lot Density Hard Surface Area Coverage Mission Hills 3rd 152 Multi -Family Units/Child Daycare 8.64 acres 17.5 50% Addition Center Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi -Family 18 acres 7.66 37% Units Block 4, Mission Hills 56 Multi -Family Units 8.92 acres 6.28 43.2% RESIDENTIAL Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. 6. The apartment building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'a Addition shall: a. Have pronounced entrance. b. Insure that all foundation walls are screened by landscaping or retaining walls. c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening 11 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2Y: inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. L Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be permitted for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition. 1. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 12 Chanhassen Planning Commission — April 18, 2017 6. No illuminated signs within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3`d Addition may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. VW*1111 30# 4" One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. g. Lighting All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Madsen moved, Randall seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3''a Addition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. 13 r)22�r� CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC DATE: 4/18/2017 CC DATE: 5/8/2017 REVIEW DEADLINE: CASE #: 2017-07 BY: Al-Jaff, et al. �B-A 5/16/2017 "The Chanhassen City Council approves a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards (Mission Hills PUD), Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 136-unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building, eight twin homes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'd Addition, on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills); and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Planned Unit Development amendment, replat of 8.64 acres into one lot, and site plan review for the construction of a four- story senior housing apartment, eight twin homes and a daycare center. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. (On February 23, 2015, the Chanhassen City Council approved a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards (Mission Hills PUD), Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 134-unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building and nine twin homes, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'd Addition, on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills). On February 22, 2016, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat, development contract and construction plans for Mission Hills and Addition subject to the conditions. These documents were never recorded and the approval lapsed.) D Al LOCATION: 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills) North of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86'" Street APPLICANT: Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. Eric Reiners 4200 W. Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, MN 55437 P: 952.996.9662 E: eric aAsra-mn.com Mission Hills Senior Housing Owner, LLC Michael Hoagberg 17550 Hemlock Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 952.378.4386 mhoagberQna headwatersdevelopment.biz PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development Mixed Use — PUD, Mixed Use 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Mixed Use ACREAGE: 8.64 Acres (376,358 square feet) DENSITY: 17.5 Units per Acre Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 2 of 36 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving amendments to PUDs because the city is acting in its legislative or policy -making capacity. A PUD amendment must be consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan. The city's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The request consists of multiple applications to facilitate the construction of a four-story senior housing apartment building that contains a child daycare, eight twin homes and a daycare center. The requests include a Planned Unit Development Amendment to existing standards, a site plan for an apartment building that houses a daycare, twin homes and a subdivision to replat an outlot into a lot. The site is located North of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86s' Street. The site is zoned Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. Sewer and water are available to the site. Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86's Street. The applicant scheduled a neighborhood meeting on April 13, 2017 to brief the neighborhood within 500 feet of the subject site on the project and seek comments and suggestions. (report continued on next page) Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 3 of 36 F 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment: The first request is to amend the ordinance regulating the use on the site from Commercial to Residential and/or Commercial. 2. Subdivision/Preliminary and Final Plat: The second request is for subdivision approval to replat 8.64 acres into a lot. 3. Site Plan: The final request is for a site plan to construct a four-story, 136-unit senior housing apartment building that houses a daycare center and eight twin homes. Site coverage is averaged over the entire development. This is permitted under the PUD ordinance (Section 20-505 (e)). The total Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 4 of 36 permitted site coverage is 50 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 47.8%. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high -quality materials. They include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. The twin homes will reflect some of the architectural elements of the apartment building yet maintain their individuality. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. Parking is buffered from views by buildings and landscaping. Sidewalks and trails allow for connections between the subject site and the surrounding buildings and separates pedestrian from vehicular traffic. Access to the site is provided via West 86a' Street. There will not be direct access to Highways 212 or 101 (Great Plains Boulevard). Staff regards the project as a well -designed development. The overall design is sensitive to the surrounding area. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan, subdivision and planned unit development amendment with conditions as outlined in the staff report. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article H, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article VIL Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 9. — Design Standards for Multifamily Developments (report continued on next page) Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 5 of 36 The Land Use Plan designates areas around the Highways 101/212 interchange as mixed use. This category has been established to accommodate either commercial or high - density residential developments. The high - density category, which includes units with a maximum net density of 16.0 units per acre, accommodates apartments and higher density condominium units, but would also permit the development of townhome-type units. The Mission Hills development was approved prior to the realignment of CSAH 101 (Great Plains Boulevard) and the construction of Highway 212. The subject site was platted as an outlot to accommodate this road work, which has since been completed allowing the site to be developed. On October 24, 1994, the City Council approved the following: • Rezoning the site from RSF to PUD (#93-4). The uses within the PUD allowed for Low Density Residential at the northeasterly portion, Medium Density along the center of the site and Neighborhood Commercial along the southwesterly portion; • Final plat of Mission Hills for 16 single-family lots and 75 medium -density lots to accommodate a total of 210 units and an outlot for future commercial development; and Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 6 of 36 • Site Plan #94-5 for the construction of 194 townhouses. The site permitted a total of 212 units within the medium density section of the site. The total number of units built was 194 units (18 units remaining). The low density residential section of the site allowed 34 units. The total homes built were 16 (18 units remaining). The Planned Unit Development Ordinance allows the transfer of density within the boundaries of a PUD. These remaining unused units are proposed to be transferred to the proposed senior housing site to accommodate the proposed 136-unit apartment building and eight twin homes. Total Acres Density # of Units Permitted # of Units Built Low Density 8.5 4 units per acre 34 16 Medium Density 26.5 8 units per acre 212 194 Total 246 210 On February 23, 2015, the Chanhassen City Council approves a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards (Mission Hills PUD), Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 134-unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building and nine twin homes, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'd Addition, on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills). On February 22, 2016, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat, development contract and construction plans for Mission Hills 3'" Addition subject to the conditions. These documents were never recorded and the approval lapsed. SITE PLAN In order to provide a better understanding of the overall development, staff will first review the site plan component, which in turn leads to the PUD amendment. The building must comply with the Development Design Standards for Mission Hills. A PUD is required to be developed to a higher quality than other projects. Site coverage is averaged over the entire development. This is permitted under the PUD ordinance (Section 20- 505 (e)). The total permitted site coverage is 50 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area 47.8%. The site plan request is for the construction of a four-story senior housing apartment building that contains a daycare center and eight twin homes. In order to accommodate those residential units, the planned unit development standards pertaining to uses on the subject site will need to be amended. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 7 of 36 The proposed daycare is proposed to be accommodated within the footprint of the main housing structure and occupies approximately 8,600SF. The daycare provides child care for up to 90 children. Sidewalks and trails allow for connections between the subject site and the surrounding buildings and separates pedestrian from vehicular traffic. Access to the site is provided via 86's Street. There will not be direct access to Highway 212 nor Great Plains Boulevard. Parking is proposed along the middle of the site and below the apartment building. It is buffered from views by the buildings and landscaping. The minimum setback in the PUD district is 50 feet from the residential district. building maintains a minimum of 90 feet at the closest point to the westerly property line and increases to 110 feet. There is a 20-foot parking and drive aisle setback from all exterior property lines. The proposed development complies with the required setbacks. The trash enclosure will be located within the underground parking area serving the apartment building. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high -quality materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. The apartment Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 8 of 36 The building has pronounced entrances, utilizes durable exterior materials, and exhibits articulation. All elevations have received well -articulated attention to detail. VAN BNDNG MRY VFJTBAE Nm LRIJE IMOBI (NAY V9Y Li VAH MQ•l�B?SKaN ALR.K WG1✓MY V>� w _ r Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 9 of 36 ver Q SRE RiOM THE MAM BRM orals rAN19RD1r6 ABtML � SojrwesT VB'� GF 5"[ wf �/`+v �J! Pti' ✓ ✓.4i V G 5Mi THE CZXVMa ftT �Y TM rU6r y" The eight twin homes will be located along the northeasterly portion of the site. The design and colors used on the buildings will complement the apartment building and remain within the same color family, however; each unit will have some unique features. Utilizing the basic building footprint, the applicant modified the exterior components and colors to create four unique yet compatible design options for the twin homes. The location of each design type is placed within the layout of eight buildings to create a maximum separation between each design option. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 10 of 36 Design Option #2 Features color scheme #2 with a gable roof design over the front bay window, square four - post column at front walk and garage door with transom windows. Design Option #1 Features color scheme #1 with a shed roof design over the front bay window, tapered siding column at front walk and standard garage door. Design Option #3 Features color scheme #1 with a gable roof design over the front bay window, square four - post column at front walk and standard garage door. Design Option #4 Features color scheme #2 with a shed roof design over the front bay window, tapered siding column at front walk and garage door with transom windows. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 11 of 36 The total number of units proposed on the site is 136 units housed in the apartment building and 16 units in nine twin homes. When the Mission Hills development was created, the development was allowed a density of: Area # of Units Permitted # of Units Built Total Remaining Medium Density 26.5 212 194 18 High Density subject Site 8.64 138 0 138 Total 35.14 350 194 156 The total number of units proposed is 152. The PUD ordinance permits the transfer of density within the boundaries of a development. Staff is recommending approval of the transfer of the remaining medium density to the high density site to accommodate the proposed development. The day care component which will be housed inside the apartment building is a complementary use for the senior housing and is intended to promote intergenerational interaction which has proven beneficial for both children and older adults. Staff regards the project as a well -designed development. The overall design is sensitive to the surrounding area. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions as outlined in the staff report. LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The applicant has submitted a lighting plan and a photometrics plan has been prepared for the site. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. All fixtures must be shielded. The development is permitted one monument sign. The total sign area may not exceed 24 square feet and 5 feet in height. A sign is proposed along the west facing Great Plains Boulevard. This sign is in a "V" shape. YOMIYEYf MCXILEGIUML b.M The city code allows double-faced signs if the angle between the two faces does not exceed 45 Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 12 of 36 degrees. The plans reflect a 30-degree separation. City code limits the number of monument signs to one per lot. The total area of the monument signs is 24 square feet and the height is 5 feet which is in keeping with the district regulations. PARKING The ordinance requires one parking space per twin home unit for a total of 16 spaces. The applicant is providing 16 spaces. The ordinance requires one parking space per independent living apartment unit. Sixty-six spaces are required and provided. The ordinance requires one parking space per three assisted -living units. Twelve spaces are required and provided. The ordinance requires one parking space per employee. The applicant is providing 24 spaces. The ordinance also requires one space per four units. The total number required is 38. The applicant is providing 38 spaces. The ordinance requires on space for every 6 children in the day care. The space is designed to allow for a maximum capacity of 90 children. This translates to 15 spaces which are provided. The total number of spaces required is 186 which is the number provided by the applicant. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size, Portion and Placement Entries: The building has pronounced entrances. Articulation: The buildings incorporate adequate detail and have been tastefully designed. The architectural style is unique to the buildings but will fit in with the surrounding area. The buildings will provide a variation in style through the use of masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. The building utilizes exterior materials that are durable and of high quality. Signs: All signage must meet the sign criteria in the Planned Unit Development Ordinance prescribed for this development. Material and Detail High quality materials are being used on the building. Color The colors chosen for the buildings are earth tones. The selection is unique, but blends in with the surrounding buildings. Height and Roof Design The building ranges in height between 14 and 51 feet. The number of stories ranges between one and four stories. The setback of the building exceeds the height of the building which will allow Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 13 of 36 for a balanced appearance and will not appear imposing. The roofline is staggered and contains dormers which adds articulation to the design of the buildings. All rooftop equipment must be screened from views. Facade Transparency All facades viewed by the public contain more than 50 percent windows and/or doors. Loadine Areas, Refuse Areas, etc. The trash enclosure is located inside the building. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the developments compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 14 of 36 drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the city's design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and the site plan review requirements. The site contains a number of outdoor seating areas and walking paths that connect to city trails. The overall design provides adequate open space. The design incorporates the curb appeal criteria listed in the city code which includes: (1) Orientation to the street or access road: (a) Setbacks (b) Spacing between buildings and view sheds. (2) Architectural detail/decorative features. (a) Windows. (b) Flower boxes. (c) Porches, balconies, private spaces. (d) Location and treatment of entryway. (e) Surface materials, finish and texture. (f) Roof pitch. (g) Building height and orientation. (3) Location of garages. (4) Landscaping including fencing and berming. (5) Street lighting. (6) Screening of parking, especially in apartment and condominium developments. (7) Variations/differentiations in units including, but not limited to, color, material, articulation etc. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the city's image. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions outlined in the staff report. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The applicant is proposing 8 twin homes, 136 unit senior housing structure and a daycare center for 90 children on an 8.64 acre parcel of land. As part of the development, the applicant is Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 15 of 36 requesting that the zoning be changed to PUD-Residential. The land is currently in agricultural production. SITE CONSTRAINTS Wetland Protection The City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the National Wetland inventory do not indicate the presence of any wetlands on the subject property. A review of historic aerial photographs and on -site observations supports the conclusion that there are no wetlands on the subject property. BlufjProtection There are no bluffs on the property. Shoreland Management A significant portion of the subject property lies within the shoreland district for Lake Susan. The development will need to meet the PUD requirements for the DNR shoreland rules. This includes having a minimum of 50% preserved as green space; they are proposing just over 53%. In addition, they must meet the minimum standards for stormwater management and erosion prevention. They have provided a stormwater management plan and an erosion prevention and sediment control plan. By meeting the requirements of the city and the Watershed District the applicant will have satisfied the DNR standards. Floodplain Overlay This property does not lie within a floodplain. Bluff Creek Overlay This property does not lie within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. SITE GRADING: GRADING AND DRAINAGE Currently the site has three drainage areas. The majority of the site either drains north to 86d' Street West or south to the Right -of -Way for MN T.H. 212. Approximately 16% of the site drains to the east to Mission Hills with much of this watershed making it to a storm water pond located at the intersection of Mission Hills Way and 86m Street West. Under the proposed design, the site is divided into seven drainage areas that will leave the site at three distinct locations. A majority of the site will be treated and discharged to existing storm sewer systems: at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and 86a' Street West, or the SW corner of the site goes either under Great Plains Boulevard and discharges onto 8601 Great Plains Boulevard, or enters the MnDOT stormwater system for TH 212. The low area where filtration basins #1 and #2 discharge shall be modeled or the discharge pipes shall directly tie-in to the MnDOT drainage system. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 16 of 36 Any discharge to MN/DOT or work within their right-of-way will require MnDOT approval and permitting. Plans must show the location and elevations of the Emergency Over -Flows (EOFs) on the project, specifically for Filtration Basin #1, #2, #4 and #5. Plans must show the style of home for the twin homes. SITE GRADING: EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL An erosion control plan consistent with Section 19-145 of city code will be required. This development exceeds the threshold for the NPDES Construction Permit. A Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required for review and approval. Many of the elements required in the SWPPP have been included in the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan sheet C100 and SWPPP plan sheet C500. The city has checklist of required SWPPP elements. This checklist will be made available to the applicant and the consulting engineer for use in their preparation of the SWPPP. The stand-alone SWPPP document shall be submitted for review with the final plat documents and will be required prior to any earth disturbing activities. The NPDES construction permit must be granted to the applicant prior to any earth disturbing activities. Stockpile locations shall be shown on the plans. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. Staff strongly recommends using plantings rather than seed, as seed can take up to three growing seasons to establish. The city will not release security until the vegetation is established. RETAINING WALLS The developer is proposing one retaining wall along the south of the proposed, main building and one retaining wall around the northern -most twin home. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. Any wall taller than 4 feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. The southern wall is approximately 360 feet long, with a maximum height of 19.5 feet. It runs parallel to the walkway around the southwestem side of the main building. The plans show a guardrail along the top of the wall to provide separation from the sidewalk. The northern retaining wall is approximately 200 feet long with a maximum height of 5 feet. This wall wraps around the northern most twin home, running between the home and Infiltration Basin #5. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 17 of 36 TRAFFIC STUDY The developer commissioned a traffic study to determine what impacts the proposed development would create compared with not developing the land. The study also reviewed the maximum build -out of the site for the proposed zoning: residential apartment building. The results of the study show that the intersections of CSAH 101 and Lake Susan Drive, CSAH 101 and W. 86th Street, and W. 86d' Street and Mission Hills Drive would have a negligible change in Level of Service and all the studied intersections are expected to function at acceptable levels. The city has been contacted by the Mission Hills Gardens Homeowners Association. This HOA is located nearby on the north side of W. 86d' Street. The two letters staff has received are included in this report. From these letters and a discussion with their Vice -President, the HOA's main concern is with, not an increase in delay from traffic, but the safety of the left turn from W. 86d' Street onto CSAH 101, intersection design as it exists today. Carver County cited that the intersection of CSAH 101 and W. 86' Street may need future improvements. City staff will continue to work with the County to determine if improvements at the intersection are warranted at this time. Staff also received notice that residents were concerned about the visibility around W. 86' Street curves when cars are parked on that street. Staff completed a sight distance analysis and determined that the sight distance at the intersection of Mission Hills Drive and W. 86th Street is restricted when cars are parked on the north side (per the MnDOT Roadway Design Manual). On February 23, 2015, the City Council approved designation of a "No Parking" zone on a portion of West 86' Street. STREETS The proposed plan consists of two private streets, Oriole Drive and Oriole Lane, to provide access to the nine twin homes and the main building and parking lots. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7-ton design. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set: o Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping, and signing. o When designing internal traffic controls, incorporate improvements based on guidelines established in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internal roadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion. o Implement stop control at the site access to 86th Street to reduce the potential for driver confusion. o Review truck turning movements to ensure that large vehicles have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 18 of 36 o Implement one-way operations at the main entrance to the senior living facility primary parking lot. Continue one-way operations into the facility pick-up/drop-off zone to provide an orderly flow of traffic. o Modify the raised median at the 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection and stripe 86th Street to help delineate the travel/turn lanes. PARKING & WALKWAYS The site plan includes two parking lots for the main building and a smaller parking lot for the twin homes. The parking lot aisle of the twin home lot must be a minimum of 26 feet wide and the stalls shall be 18 feet long. The plans include sidewalks and trails throughout the property. The pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. Railing shall be provided near retaining walls taller than 6 feet. MnDOT may require a Limited Use Permit (LUP) for the trail connection within MnDOT right- of-way. WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER MAIN — PRIVATE UTILITIES All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city's requirements for public utilities. The plan shall use 2017 Chanhassen standard detail plates, which are available on the city's website. The plans call for 8" C900 water main and 8" SDR 35 sanitary sewer main to connect to the services stubbed out in the city's previous utility projects on W. 86t6 Street. ASSESSMENTS This property was assessed and has paid in full for property assessments for the projects that constructed water main and sanitary sewer main under W. 860' Street. Currently, no assessments are owed by this property. This parcel has paid the city for one (1) water and sanitary service hook-up. The additional twin home units (7) must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook-up fee at the time of final plat. The remaining hook-up fees would be paid with the building permit. The developer shall work with the Building Department to determine the city SAC and WAC fees for the main building. The hook-up fees for the main building are due with the building pert. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of city code describes the required storm water management development standards. Section 19-141 states that "these development standards shall be Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 19 of 36 reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features." This site will need to be compliant with the City of Chanhassen's MS4 permit. Part III D. 5 requires that new developments with a disturbance equal to, or greater than, one (1) acre must have no net -increase from pre - development conditions of stormwater discharge volume, total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorous (TP). The site will also need to be compliant with the NPDES Construction Permit. The site will fall under the jurisdiction of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and be subject to their stormwater management rule. This rule requires the abstraction of 1.1 inch of runoff from all new impervious surfaces and removal of 90% TSS (Total Suspended Solids) and 60% TP (Total Phosphorus). This is the same removal as indicated in Chapter 19 of city code. It is staffs understanding that this site received approval from the Watershed District in 2015 for a restricted site condition that reduces the requirements due to the unique features of the site. The applicant's engineer will continue to work with the Watershed District to update their permit. City staff will evaluate the design based on the requirements above until the city receives confirmation from the Watershed District that this project will be evaluated under a different requirement. The applicant provided a summary of the water quality benefits of the proposed practices from the MIDS calculator. The annual reduction by the proposed BMPs (Best Management Practices) are 67% removal for TSS and 60% removal for TP. This does not meet the requirements for TSS, so the design must be revised. The applicant has concluded, based upon the geotechnical report, that the soils are predominately lean clays which have a low infiltration rate. While this is a condition under which infiltration is limited, under the requirements of both the MS4 permit and the watershed district rules, the applicant must implement, to the "maximum extent practicable" volume reduction techniques other than infiltration. The applicant states that volume storage and some infiltration will be provided below the draintile elevation of the filtration basins. The P8 model shall conform to the MN Stormwater Manual's estimation of 0.06"/hour for Type D soils. The infiltrometer testing results for each basin shall be submitted to the city to verify the infiltration rate prior to release of the security for the filtration basins. The draintile shall have a grade of 0.5% to facilitate drainage flows and minimize sags. The construction plans shall include the following: cross -sections of each filtration basin with invert elevations called -out, source and quantity of iron filings, and method of mixing the filings and sand prior to placement. Staff recommends control outlets in filtration basins #3 and #5 to reduce saturated lawn conditions during basin drain -down. The current design removes only 20% of the required 1.1" of impervious run-off volume. The design must be revised to meet the 1.1" volume removal or the applicant must receive designation of a restricted site from the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. Staff recommends volume reduction by stormwater reuse for irrigation purposes as a preferred Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 20 of 36 method. Given that as much as 4.5 acres could be irrigated upon final build out, storm water reuse could also result in a significant reduction in potable water use. All basins must have pretreatment of water prior to entering the feature. For those areas where curb cuts serve as the inlet, rip -rap is an effective energy dissipation method reducing the risk of scour however, it is an ineffective pre-treatment method. City staff has found pretreatment chambers, such as the Rain GuardianTm to be an effective pretreatment practice for curb cut inlets. The applicant is proposing pretreatment by grass swales and sump catch basins. In areas where storm water is directed to the basin through a catch basin, a sump manhole, at least three feet in depth should be used, four feet is recommended. Staff recommends installation of Downstream Defender or Preserver on sump manholes to reduce maintenance frequency on the private stormwater system. The plans shall label the sump catchbasins. The proposed BMPs will be privately owned. However, as these will be routed to the city's storm sewer system it is in the city's interest to assure that these function as designed for their life. It is also required under the city's MS4 permit that we have a mechanism in place to assure proper operations, maintenance and function of the practices. The applicant must provide an operations and maintenance (O&M) manual to the city for review and comment. The applicant must provide a drainage and utility easement over the filtration basins for city personnel to inspect the practices and to require maintenance if the property owner is negligent in their duties under the O&M. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. Staff strongly recommends using plantings rather than seed, as seed can take up to three growing seasons to establish. The city will not release security until the vegetation is established. The design should follow the MN Stormwater Manual guidelines and recommendations wherever possible to do so. The applicant shall provide justification for any deviations from the guidelines. For instance, it has been staff's experience that filter socks around drain tile are prone to failure. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommends bedding the underdrain in #57 stone and using a choker course above the bedding. Surface Water Management Fees Section 4-30 of code sets out the fees associated with surface water management (SWMP). The fee is based on land use type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. The daycare SWMP fee is pro- rated at the commercial rate and the senior living is pro -rated at the high -density residential rate. The city gives credit toward the SWMP fee of 25% for volume reduction of 1.1". However, the proposed design only removes 20% of the required 1.1", so the credit is $6,625.59. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 21 of 36 This fee calculation is shown on the table below: Acres (pro -rated based on building square Per Acre Fee footage) Totals Surface Water Management Fee for Daycare $30,600.00 0.43 $13,219.20 Surface Water Management Fee for Senior Living $14,510.00 8.21 $119,098.08 Credit 20% * of the 1.1 " volume reduction ($6,625.59 Total due at fmal plat $125,691.69 LANDSCAPING Minimum requirements for landscaping include 7,891 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, 2 landscape islands or peninsulas, 31 trees for the vehicular use areas, and bufferyard plantings along the property lines. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape 7,891 sq. ft. >7,891 sq. ft. area Overall trees required for 31 trees 31 trees vehicular use area Landscape islands or 2 islands/peninsulas 2 islands/peninsulas peninsulas/parkingpeninsulas/parking lot The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot/vehicular use area. Bufferyard requirements: Required plantings Proposed plantings Bufferyard B —north 4 Overstory trees 4 Overstory trees prop. line, 240' 9 Understory trees 6 Understory trees 14 Shrubs 16 shrubs Bufferyard B — south 5 Overstory trees 4 Overstory trees prop. line, 540' 10 Understory trees 10 Understory trees 20 Shrubs 20 Shrubs Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 22 of 36 Bufferyard A — east prop. 6 Overstory trees 6 Overstory trees Line, 650' 6 Understory trees 5 Understory trees 12 Shrubs 20 Shrubs Bufferyard B — west 20 Overstory trees 20 Overstory trees prop. Line, 1000' 30 Understory trees 16 Understory trees 50 Shrubs 10 Shrubs The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for bufferyard plantings. Underplanted areas are shown in italics. Staff recommends that the applicant meet minimum requirements for landscaping for the development. The east property line buffer is short only one tree, but the existing trees now serving as a buffer for the Mission Hills development are schedule to be removed and graded according to plans. Staff recommends that the south half of the east buffer yard area receive further review for additional plantings. The applicant should also consider locating landscaping near the comer of 86a' St W and 101 to block headlight glare from turning vehicles. The comer unit is exposed to incoming light from turning vehicles and buffer plantings outside of the sight triangle could help alleviate the issue. As noted in the Landscape Plan General Notes, `park grade' trees are to be provided (item #12). This type of plant material does not meet city standards and is unacceptable. Item 12 of the general notes shall be deleted. PARKS This property is located within the %rmile neighborhood park service area for Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the Mission Hills Senior Living community will have convenient access to this publicly maintained recreation facility. Chanhassen Hills Park is eight acres in size and features a playground, basketball court, picnic shelter, ball8eld, benches, and walking trails. Off-street parking is also available on Chanhassen Hills Drive South. Bandimere Community Park and Lake Susan Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 23 of 36 Community Park are both located within the one -mile community park service of the new Mission Hills Senior Living housing. These two parks are more robust in their recreation facility offerings, including features such as a fishing pier, boat landing, tennis courts, soccer fields, and extensive walking trails. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision TRAILS The subject site has convenient access to the public trails along Great Plains Boulevard, the three- mile Rice Marsh Lake Trail Loop, and the lakeside trail route to Lake Susan Park. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT The site is zoned Planned Unit Development. The designation for the southwesterly portion of the site is commercial. The land use plan designates the site for Mixed Use Development. This category allows commercial uses meeting the daily needs of a neighborhood and/or high -density residential uses. Amending the PUD ordinance regulating this site will be in keeping with the comprehensive plan. Staff is recommending approval of the amendment and adoption of the revised standards. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FINDINGS The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Fes: The site is guided mixed use (residential and neighborhood commercial). An apartment building with a daycare facility and townhouses are a permitted and a reasonable use in this location. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. Fes: The proposed use is and will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area through the implementation of the design standards, landscaping, architecture, etc. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: The proposed use will conform with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance such as design standards, signage, durable materials, uses, etc. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 24 of 36 d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. Fes: The proposed use will complement the surrounding area and will not depreciate it. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. Finding: The site is located within the Municipal Urban Service Area. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Fes: Based upon traffic studies conducted by the applicant's traffic engineer, traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The developer is requesting preliminary plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot — Mission Hills 3'a Addition. Lot 1 is proposed to house an apartment building with a daycare and eight twin homes. The ordinance states, "All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by the zoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontage on a public street." The lot has street frontage. Access to the lot is gained from a curb cut off of West 86's Street. The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending Lam- -- Lot 1, Block 1 IW Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. SUBDIVISION FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 25 of 36 Finding: The subdivision meets the intent of the city code subject to the conditions of the staff report and the PUD. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the citys comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable plans. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; FindinE: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; F : The proposed subdivision will be served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Fiodin : The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. 7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. FindinE: The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban infrastructure. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 26 of 36 COMPLIANCE TABLE Lot Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Lot Coverage 50% 47.8%* Building Height Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Principal Four-story Four -Story Building Setbacks Ordinance Requirements Subject Site West Front yard 0' 110, South Front yard 0' 35' North Front yard 0' 30' East Rear yard 50' 80' Parking Requirements Ordinance R uirements Subject Site Stalls 186 186 West Front yard setback 35' 90, South Front yard setback 35' 260' North Front yard setback 35' 150' East Rear yard setback 50' 90' Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt of the following three motions: 1. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT ""The City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Mission Hills to allow High Density Use with a Childcare Center on the site and set standards for the structures as shown below LW04Wgtsare shown in bold and highlighted in grE with the following conditions, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact. 1. The site must comply with the DNR Shoreland Rules. 2. The site shall comply with the following standards: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 27 of 36 Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the commercial development shall comply with the Neighborhood Business District, BN. Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3ro Addition shall comply with the R-12, High Density District. b. Permitted Uses eofamereial and sen,iee tises eensistent with the neighbefheed. The uses shall be limited to these as defined herein. The type of iises to be pr-evided on this outlet shall be lew iMensitj neighber-heed efiented retail and sefviee establishments to meet daily needs of residents. „sec may include .,.. A to meth,.... sized ..,ct:,,,Fant (no drive th u windows), ,sx:, day eare -e_heed . eal 1 .es>e .. other sifaila_ type and ,.ale e..l.l.l,.. h aces. n,..._ he e a e..mitted , e in .he .,,......e_e:el a ft of this distF:et. The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: Single Family Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential with a Child DaCenter C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The esmmersial• High bensity parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of- way and/or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the bommeFeial High Density portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Street Commercial Nigh NiWj Building Setback* Residential Residential Parking Setback Commercial Parking Setback* Building Setback Highway 101 * 50' 20' Highway 212 * 50' 20' West 86's Street * 30' 20' Interior Lot Lines O'(from commercial) 50' from residential 0' 0' 0' (from commercial) 35' from residential * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 9's Supplemental filed April 10, Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 28 of 36 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, l& Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 11' Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12'" Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; Mission Hills 2' Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Mission Hills 3rdAddition: Area: 376,358.4 square f Width: 480 feet Depth: 620 feet BLOCK USE Net Lot Density Hard Surface Area Coverage Commmial Mission Hills 3rd 2 Multi -Fa /Child Day j AAdjjW Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi-FamilyUI 18 acres 7.66 37% Block 4, Mission Hills 56 Multi -Family Units 1 8.92 acres 6.28 43.2% e Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 29 of 36 RESIDENTIAL 1. Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. 6. The apartment building located on Lot 3rd Addition shall: a. Have pronounced entrance. b. Insure that all foundation walls are screened by landscaping or retaining walls. c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and sulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All evations tbxt,c m be viewed by t @ jNAWj& jWpjeceived equal ttteention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2%: inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 30 of 36 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f. Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be permitted for Lot 1, Block Mission Hills Yd Addition. 1. sign. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wail signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within 1,5FT.99MM, Mission Hills 3r1 Addition flw-outlormay be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 31 of 36 g. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within Ipudet Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Mills 31 Addition shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. 2. SUBDIVISION "The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3`a Addition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. Unit Type No. of Units Amount Total Independent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000 Assisted/MemoryCare Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000 Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000 Total $478,000 Engineering Conditions: 1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69. These shall be due with the final plat. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 32 of 36 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance manual that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against the property. 4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the BMPs. Planning Conditions: 1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment and Site Plan application. 3. SITE PLAN APPROVAL "The City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 136-unit senior housing apartment with a childcare center and eight twin homes, Planning Case 2017-07 as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resource Conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for approval. The revised plan shall meet minimum bufferyard requirements. 2. Additional planting may be required along the southern half of the east property line. Park grade trees are not acceptable quality and will not meet landscape standards for the City of Chanhassen. Item #12 of the General Notes shall be deleted. 4. The applicant shall consider locating landscaping along the rain garden near the corner of 861" St W and 101 to block headlight glare from turning vehicles. Building Official Conditions: The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota A "Code Record" is required (Code Record schematic plans may be same scale as architectural). For "Code Record" information go to MN Dept. of Labor and Industry: http://www.dli.mn.¢ov/CCLD/PlanConstruction.gW 2. Buildings must be protected with automatic fire suppression systems. As required by Minnesota State Building Code and /or Minnesota State Residential Code. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 33 of 36 3. An accessible route must be provided to all buildings, parking facilities, public transportation stops and common use facilities. 4. Parking areas, including parking garages, must be provided with accessible parking spaces dispersed among the various parking areas and building entrances. 5. Accessible dwelling units must be provided in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. 6. The building owner and/or their representatives should meet with the Inspections Division to discuss plan review and permit procedures (in particular, type of construction and allowable area issues must be addressed). Fire Marshal Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow painted curbing will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for specifics. Street names are required for the main road entering the project and the loop road serving the twin homes. Street signs shall be installed prior to building construction. The current street names proposed on the plan are Oriole Drive and Oriole Lane. The name Oriole has already been used within the City of Chanhassen and may not be reused within this development. Alternative proposed street names must be submitted to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. 4. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Prior to combustible construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 6. In lieu of a fire lane to the back side of the building, additional fire protection features shall be provided, including but not limited to Class 1 standpipes installed per Fire Department requirements. 7. Provide to Chanhassen Fire Marshal radius turn dimensions for accessing the building. The concern is the center islands for getting fire apparatus to the front doors. Engineering Conditions: 1. The low area where filtration basins #1 and #2 discharge shall be modeled or the discharge pipes shall directly tie-in to the MnDOT drainage system. 2. Plans must show the location and elevations of the Emergency Over -Flows (EOFs) on the project, specifically for Filtration Basin #1, #2, #4 and #5. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 34 of 36 3. Plans must show the style of home for the twin homes. 4. The stand-alone SWPPP document shall be submitted to the city for review with the final plat documents and will be required prior to any earth disturbing activities. 5. An NPDES construction permit must be granted to the applicant prior to any earth disturbing activities. 6. Stockpile locations shall be shown on the plans. 7. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 8. Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 9. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 10. If a wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier would be required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 11. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7- ton design. 12. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set. 13. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide and the parking spaces must be 18 feet long. 14. Pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. 15. If required by MnDOT, the applicant shall obtain a LUP for the trail connection on MnDOT right-of-way. 16. All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city's requirements for public utilities. 17. The plan shall use 2017 Chanhassen standard detail plates, which are available on the city's website. 18. This parcel has paid the city for one (1) water and sanitary service hook-up. The additional twin home units (7) must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook-up fee at the time of final plat. The remaining hook-up fees would be paid with the building permit. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 35 of 36 19. The hook-up fees for the main building are due with the building permit. 20. All work within the MnDOT right-of-way must be approved by MnDOT. 21. This site will need to be compliant with the City of Chanhassen's MS4 permit. 22. The applicant's engineer will continue to work with the Watershed District to update their permit and meet requirements. 23. City staff will evaluate the design based on the requirements above until the city receives confirmation from the Watershed District that this project will be evaluated under a different requirement. The annual reduction by the proposed BMPs (Best Management Practices) are 67% removal for TSS and 60% removal for TP. This does not meet the requirements for TSS, so the design must be revised. The current design removes only 20% of the required 1.1" of impervious run-off volume. The design must be revised to meet the 1.1" volume removal. 24. The applicant shall evaluate the practicality of implementing, to the "maximum extent practicable," volume reducing practices including re -use. 25. The P8 model submitted shows an anticipated infiltration rate of 1.0"/hour, this is contrary to the MN Stormwater Manual's estimation for Type D soils: 0.06"/hour and shall be revised. 26. The construction plans shall include filtration basin cross sections and call out information about the iron filings. 27. The infiltrometer testing results for each basin shall be submitted to the city to verify the infiltration rate prior to release of the security for the filtration basins. 28. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. 29. In areas where storm water is directed to the basin through a catch basin, a sump manhole, at least three feet in depth should be used, four feet is recommended. 30. The plans shall label the sump catchbasins. 31. The proposed BMPs will be privately owned. 32. Erosion control blanket shall include the swales in their entirety. 33. The design of the stormwater BMPs shall follow the guidelines of the MN Stormwater Manual unless the City Engineer agrees to a deviation for those guidelines. 34. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2017-07 April 18, 2017 Page 36 of 36 35. Staff strongly recommends using plantings rather than seed, as seed can take up to three growing seasons to establish. The city will not release security until the vegetation is established. 36. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. Planning Conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to improve the screening of the southwesterly portion of the site through the use of berming and landscaping. 2. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 3. The site is permitted one monument sign facing Great Plains Boulevard. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 4. Approval of the Site Plan application is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment and Final Plat Approval." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Application and Project Narrative. 3. Mission Hills PUD Ordinance. 4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. 5. Traffic Study dated July 14, 2016. 6. Letter from MnDOT dated April 6, 2017. 7. Letter from Carver County dated April 6, 2017. 8. Neighborhood Meeting Letter dated April 4, 2017. 9. Letter from Karla Thomsen dated October 28, 2014. 10. Letter from David Nickolay dated December 5, 2014. 11. Reduced plans dated received March 17, 2017. GAPLAN\2017 Planning Cases\17-07 Mission Hills Senior Living\Staff report 2017 CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 03/17/2017 3:34 PM Receipt No. 00342420 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Chanhassen Senior Living 17550 Hemlock Ave Lakeville MN 55044- Hwy 101 & Hwy 212 Devloper LLC ------------ ---- Subdivision 1,000.00 Sign Rent 200.00 Recording Fees 50.00 Rezoning Fees 100.00 Site Plan Review 1,270.00 GIS List 342.00 Total Cash Check 10073 Change 2,962.00 0.00 2,962.00 0.00 I VANl 1( W f 4 SISN , A'f ION P 1 TWN'HOME DESIGN OPTION #P T WMHOME DESIGN OPTION LOCATIONS TWWHOME DESGN OPTION #4 1WMNN/E NLLA DFSliJOGliph A3.21 VIEW OF B TE FROM THE MAIN ENTRY DRIVE MAN BUILDING AERIAL FROM SOUTHAE5T VIER OF SITE FROM THE CORNER OF 86TH STREET REST AND HIGHWAY 101 VIEW OF SITE HIGHWAY 101 JU5T FAST SOUND WALL ,�mm A3.10 EMIT- 3D VIEW FROM THE CURB N FRONT Of A TWINHOME VILLA lkbl M1[ FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION 3D MEW FROM FROM THE AIR BEHIND ATWINHOME VILLA RESIDENCE REAR ELEVATION 111 J = 5 0 Ln Tvnro¢n¢HUA NFWSAW FitvnTla+s A3.20 MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PRO- TT GSMT[KTOR STRULTIIIIAL dbM�{, t-21 VEYOR HM r of yVEEi A0.0 /i � •J fi1`�'f 0 ` J J iMISSION HILLS 3HD ADDIT/ON C.R.TDOCE N0. .�`��. dw �.\"y .. \ .` \ c,. `::.:.:. '...:'• ..'..ww^ ":''a"'.n.�.:'" I.".1 'a";,."»"..^ -mom... `� wr"m. rmo r.. am m.a ."r+•. rw.uw.,u.nwwrw...w la .. \: '( I LOT 1 ./ -7!j , E�100 PE�IS��� vo T T � 5�6 JEG rJJ; BLOC I NWT :— T TRJNlC MCl/' C,' .' RA - ta�.'L177.'+T1.7, VIMA61lD w d Ir F1,10, ' hOWWAYND 2/2 A DCT RIGViT ..r N.. i„— 7 _ n mswu v� i a `M trsaasraas: •--�••— �R^-:ra:Nsra _ oauu M&WW ecru mox wa �e� p ®: nr wwum r�m.a�.rnnrr..�. �w u.nuna.. mee e— Ti — r e 1--=nsia:,_n=�i='nai A MINN.-, ::-1 7AUNK H/C>h'WAYNO. 212 y emu` m�ams� ... -/ •r,ar— meaee_ncy •,�•�"• 1 PAVING AND GEOMETRIC RM of 4 � u F 3 s: a .y 3 c' � O O Wg O a E # ° PARCEL MISSION HILL SENIOR LMNG ID: 955310080 G*NHSSEN. MNNESOTA �—A— & v 2 PLAN * JL S,Y.YIX1,4WrN� JL f Ib nggrrs YCI * I& I FEE Y 1 * �I d' fiihA w.w ]ATl" tulw=w * � iTuux'/q�S�iW YaA 4� '1I 1 i!1 r }\ JI JL wnw¢ %Y 2 —eeiwax-, Y 1^e1i35 �!� Y 1^e1i35 �!� i5 1 ' 6 Aillgip. s i iq�o�a, �int ;t iip p P tib5 CV9lM1ki Y3iSR'f` JL 1 ! W:d I , p! a !� 'All 1 it 'r } '�iilpll ` Y 11�Ia(i� YF • i I il. III 71 smc 1 it 'r } '�iilpll ` Y 11�Ia(i� YF • i I il. III 71 smc y—I T It 1 CML DETAILS SHEET C401 ��fL�1'�4HYRsYW✓:k-:11© 0000©©©0W o ®0©omo� NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP I I REGRE Ar _—s+emer e3praea., MIrlGN NILLB SENIOR LIVING SIM PLAN � Igex BTVEET Na b: ! ER 9TE PLAN NOTES: ®�a.rr rio.asr�rren QmunsSr�a r ! r rp • i �� r•or..e.... .r�.r ®� �� /1 RETAINING WALL DETAIL V rw�r .ice ®.m. ®wre�arvsr`.s /1 FLAGPOLE BABE Moo /� INTEIEJATIGNAL BYFIDOL GF AGCEBBIGILITY ' s vumni w 3 n BOLLARD DET_ & NA'IDIGAP PARCMG BIGNAGE . sIR n^N • 4R pMl [ETNLS A1.1 U ENS MP MONUMENT SIGN PLAN r— ------------1--L--- _—_— '1 MON. %T SIGN OECT10N9 + L n MON IMENT BIGN ELEVATIONS v vp F. i I I I I I .. �hE " LATE PATIO FENCE LOLII'M6 ----------- 1--- L__A---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I'111mill IIII 1�1 IIIIII IIIIII IIIII t����l'�I I `EM F CAFE PATIO FENCE AND COLUMN ELEVATIONS m hIdddd l O S Wks O yZ0 V) O LO o W) ig I�aNAVNr slw �uTALs . F.�iID G6SfN rtNa ¢uas A1.2 I GKIpbA.. o I Ic ,l ... I cecmuaa.W.Ip. CGVER MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVM SR PL4N Q99.IQQ�9�I000 Z < O 5 3p � yZc W In _ Q�Q o Z 95 o G .IMnuuEww Ws w.ss w •pMR EC{EWLE A1.3 'fljl��. . �I j jll��� ' I -------`= IIiI11�J1 '_.��� ICI ire FM FAM vie' i IE �Imm A m 1 I it s�is ,p�3 pii !- .[ i 11 G9 ■■ 7 r 1 f i Ilil�� t �--■ , 'I� I�I�T`71 1 1 r �ii.i. - q■ 6 Gi� ivGG i ii Giili iGii n GBf i �G .nisi ii�. ,000G� ■ '1 ry 1 1 III 1 • ' I �1 • ' I 1' "I �I 1 �ii 1 1 imli 6P I�I�III I►� h Ili II�1 �I �� A� m r,p�e F,iyr FY i`,* a Rdi er. 9nLtGC rr ry Twine +'" '-j � erAb Er rre, rrr icy r•. yL a �, i 046 •=."""'era -, , AERIAL VIEW FROM WEST MAN BUILDING ENTRY VE5TIBULE AND DRIVE UNDER CANOPY AERIAL VIEW FROM NORTHEAST VIEW OF MAN MONUMENT 51614 ALONG HIGHWAY 101 4;P A3.11 30 MEW FROM THE CURB IN FRONT OF A TWANHOME MLLA RESIDENCE 40 "I, al91F •�,°" FRONT ELEVATION SIDE EEVATION Rk 3D MEW FROM FROM THE AR BEHIND A i MNHOME MLLA RESIDENCE REAR ELEVATION (N 0 75 rvma,dcHUA NF%5 MD BEV�RGNS A3.20 pip TMNHOME DESIGN OKION 82 f W NHOME DESIGN ORION LOCATIONS TVANII DESIGN OPTION 84 IV/PIWJN( Nl1A [f 1�N G['fnH15 A3.21 f. snwefn Renntence at SMMO unless MW omnsese 3.!rot a Coneeuctbn O urrerl for Desgn Purposes only 3. 9aMeM IMror talc points ®3p' AEF unlne nmeC 00ereisa 4. 3tenEertl oul ulc polnis 0 OreEe unbss need otharwlse Item Description Non -Scannable Item -C Folder Number l f Folder Name Job Number �3 7 L Box Number a4 i !ea Gail+ •. CITY OF CIIMSSEN C(\�nnry'ryi 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota55317 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us ed ,us nd he nd or on ise Ufa ;ity to er, or rrtwcr Bowes 02 1 P $ 000.460 00031 95036 APR 06 2017 MAILED FROMZIP CODE 55317 NIXIE 553 N7E 1. 1718064/06117 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 5532.763.4747 'Z376-62524-66-37 rinlliltllrinlilllllrrlrllnlllrllllnirlllitlrlllllrllltlrllr VIOLA MARIE COLLINGHAM LIVING 573 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.7716 JIII�IIJrI�IL nPlil�llllllllllllllllllnllnl�lll IJrJL Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until ' later in the evening, depending on the order of the a end"a. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. , Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision.and Site Plan Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit segigr housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and ardaycare center. Applicant: Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard. Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice., - The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's requr�st and to obtain input frorrP.tt a neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff Questions & by email at saljaffOci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded 119e'.; h;'=. ,>yc�b ite. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.ustnotifyme to sin b0i , ••+'"µ City Raid. Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonirgs, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notAied of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to allend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information aM a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview, of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and dleCass the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, amrm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Razonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority, vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/mdustdal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may lake several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should chack with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood sWulispersonfrepresentinve is encouraged to provide a contact for the sty. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review, the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public nearing, the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be induced in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff Person named on the notification. fiIt*T EAPC,iLI 1s�1� rim CITY OF CIIMSSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 rrrxev eowea 02 1 P $ 000.460 00031 95036 APR 06 2017 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 www.d.chanhassen — — 316I 080 4 / 06 117 553 N7E RTN TO SEND PL TINE EXP T 2''_? �H gv : tii mt, 553�7-3507 asSR"IR Ihilrnsll i1,11, j E ,„Il,talnl„t,tt1�11 TO This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not inten Itt t tit it t,tt t it as one This map is a compilation of recordsinto ti d I p , me on an data oc city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the art is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not wai...— mat the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third games which arse out of the users access or use of data provided.-- l---i PATRICK S & CONSTANCE SULLIVAN 8500 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 IrIIIIIIIItdrlllrllrlrlrlllrllllutlllllrll111IIIIItIIIrIIIIIIIt Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center. Applicant: S erides Reiners Architects, Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard. Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AWaff Questions & by email at saljaffcaci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's Website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to si n u City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional antl Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rwomnps, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feel of the subject site to to notified of the application in w*iting. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all partinant information and a recommendation These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff volt give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Remnings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residental to commercial4ndusthal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any parson wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighdorhoad spokespersmirepre"Mativa is encouraged to provide a contad for the aty. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Slan is also available d review the prolect with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to Me City Council, r you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Step person named on the notification. CITY OF CIIANIIASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 5�01as pQs), i� � PITNEY BOWES 02 I P $ 000.460 0003195036 APR 062017 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 www.CI.Chanhassen.mn.us 1-7 [i5I0804i06! 553 N7E RTN TO SIND IARD TIME 0-P 9 STF 2135 ;K �p-vr!vrs L:MND 553-44_®005 N PRAIRIE r } RET"I" TO jEi3GER 1 'llil il`jlllllnlli�llillll'lill1} I r' This map is neither a legally recorded map nor survey and is not local compilation ao an a oca 1 1 11111111 I' l l l'� l 1 11 as one. This map is a mpilation of records nform tin tl data I t city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not wary Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data provided. BEVERLY HAFFNER 509 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-7715 I�I��II11111'I�III''i�lll'III'111'Ilil�ll�illll�llll�'II��IIIIIL Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda, Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan 7 Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center. Applicant: Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input tom the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the'Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps:; at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff Questions & by email at saljaffaci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.ustnotifyme to sign u I City Review Procedure: • Submvisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonirgs, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before Me Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feel of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overnew of the rayon antl a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pan of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the Public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Counal may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly Me Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindusaial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespemon/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested parson(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any corresWulence regarding the application will W included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. CITY OF CHISSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 7� y'TC 5E y�PtFS POST =��_r v Z -'w PITMEY BOWER 02 i P $ 000.460 0003195036 APR 062017 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 RT- - G XD 1iWAR.4 QNr �w Rp 5®g8 �ONUTfK 1yE H;I.L 55345` � This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not inter 5 5 N� E TT �N K A MN �,y 3 as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data Im Mi ;tit`1 . ��ir1'>117 1' city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the ai n E 1r r,r,,,11t1` is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not we ``{1`tr Srrt��r Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are 1 ANDREW B 0Akl%ll I( the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigation. any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or chrectior ,,.casion in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §486.03, Subtl. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which ags, use of data provided. J, "I' N AM 582 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 {il{Iirilllli{iil1{1:il �1lii{iiiJill Ili Ill 11irrllil�{�{{i{{'i{ Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Tlme•' Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center. Applicant: S erides Reiners Architects, Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard. Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens Public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff Questions & by email at saljaff(fti.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonirgs, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Cade Amendments require a pubic telling before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be noMed of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all Pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and diecuas the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or mortify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonmgs, land use and coda amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commemiallmdustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take severe) months to complete. Any person wishing to Mil" an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the o y. Dien developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their ph posa). Staff is also available to review the Project with any Interested persoms). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease.meq Ina Planning Staff enon named on the notification. IYYT� SC This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to bt as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in v: city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If enors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought -by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arse out of the user's access -or use of data provided. 5 5 3 2.7>@ 14 7 CITY OF CAANAASSEN y�jes POST in 4 i 7 o,rxev eovres 021 P $ 000.460 0003195036 APR 062017 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesnt, c" F3.6,34 g9! i1 �1 WWA ": i +y,Te'iA'6�,t.i111�ttsllltts��l,g��'11�: �1 t_ %I\\,'ti�stt jl,t3;,�i'1�'t� MANEESH BHAGAT 125 MAIN ST SE #130 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414-2161 Notice of Public Hearing l —� Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center. Applicant: Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard. Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's requebt and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff Questions & by email at saljaff(dci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and bsenm Uses, Watland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of Me subject Site to be notified of Ma, application in writing. Any interested party le invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on Me subject application that includes all pertinent information sntl a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, slab will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about Me proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will does the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reveres, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings. land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of dw City Council except rezonings and lend use amendments from residential to commerciellnduamal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless Me applicant waives this standard Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regaining its status and Scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonRepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested peraon(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any comeepondence regarding the application will be inc uded in Me report to the City Counciltl you men to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named an the notification shall not be liable for any damages, and defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the C. its employees or agents, or third parties whit data provided. .as all claims, and agrees to .ny and all claims brougtf :by User, afi SQ of S531r > es POSTT N` 5 r r� � PiTNEY sowed 02 IF $ 000.460 0003195036 APR 062017 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 SSEN loulevard \',5317 1 � .,1 Yl" 1 V MELISSA A MUIR 22485 CANTREL WAY FARMINGTON, MN 55024-4011 11111,11ill 1.11HO-Ill- IIiI'III]1,lifill I'll 111111.11111,1.111 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center. Applicant: S erides Reiners Architects, Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard. Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purp6se of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about iiiis'pro/ect. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.cli.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff Questions & by email at saljaffaci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the cty's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional ell Interim Uses, Welland Alteretiona Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a Public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a repon on Me subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the repot and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pan Of the hearing process, The Commission will close ttw public hearing and discuss Me item and make a recommendation to the City Council The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wfrol ly or paNy me Planning Commission's recommendation. Remnings, land use and code amerc ments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezomngs and lend use amendments from residential to commerclaVndustnal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 50 days unless the applicant waives this starclard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersxVrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the Off. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any conespondenco regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. 11you wish to have something to ba included in the report, lease contact the Plarmirci Stall person named on the noaficetion. MW FTR# CITY OF CWHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 5""'7 www.ci.chanhas�,- \ ay��®�NDI y9 t yi t� N t This map is neither a legally recorderi - 'CS ? PS as one. This map is a COMPI 11 o used andfederal tt, FQ sg ��r city, the City does of presentGeographic Informiation System that di P'',tA' S -� `a \�\\\\�``�, 51VSES Pos) . v� -] PITNFY BOWIE 02 1 P $ 000.460 0003195036 APR 062017 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 any other purpose requiring exactint \\`\\` \ .ecision MATTHEW L 8r KATHLEEN ALBRECHT in the depiction of geographic feat[. \ ,��\�� _ 'ound please 6220 CASCADE PASS contact 952-227-1107. The precedin, \ \\ ..suant to Minnesota Statutes§466.03, Subd. 21(2000), anc , acknowledges that the City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9476 shall not be liable for any damages, a7 waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the —, prom any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arse out of the user's acoesWuse of data provided. =-5� 1i�I11�'11'L�I��hr'III��"I��rl�lrl�llll�l''I�IIN�I�'lil���l�� Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date &Time: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center. Applicant: S erides Reiners Architects, Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the propyed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff Questions & by email at saljafficDci.chanhassen.mmus or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/noti me to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviewa, Conditional and Intenm Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feel of the subject site to be notified of the application m writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation, The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pan of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/ndua nal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developars are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing. Me City Council does not. Minutes are taken antl any com•spondenco regarding the application will be included in Me repot to the City Council, If you wish to have something to ba included In Me report, please contact the Plannino Staff person named on the Cfi tin t•l;`1 .f W 4>tl. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Disclaimer 50-0 This map is neither a legali•- 5 5 4U !` % • "'' 1- ® \ as one. This mao^ city. county. NiY-'S.G may; .>;?-.��� is to be usr c ` _- Geographic the City does r, m r . ,. y other purpo161 6� `\\ _.,ng or in the depiction ' S53 `S 0 y1�1'1r\„ -w' or precision y ....es are found please contact 952-227- rbt i�\�\1 S - ,.,,nded pursuant to Minnesota Stables §466.03, ity. _ Ir this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable _,o expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, a ,.,mess the City from any and all claims brought by User, its ?'Api9Y . 95 ML a4q5thj¢pgr Fv*ich arse out of the user% *09€ er use of data provided. �PtFS POSco I'N` ZRz / �� � PIVMEV 60WE9 02 IF $ 000.460 0003195036 APR 062017 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 GEORGE W & LESLIE GILMAN 7470 ATHERTON WAY EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346-4410 III, "'II11'11H1'11II'IIIIPIi �PtFS POSco I'N` ZRz / �� � PIVMEV 60WE9 02 IF $ 000.460 0003195036 APR 062017 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 GEORGE W & LESLIE GILMAN 7470 ATHERTON WAY EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346-4410 III, "'II11'11H1'11II'IIIIPIi Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening. depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomes (16 independent living units) and a daycare center. Applicant: S erides Reiners Architects, Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. Thd p&pobe of this public hearing is to inform you about the,.. applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following stems` at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff Questions & by email at saljaffCcbci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Iraadm Uses, Weasel Alterations, Razonirge, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a Public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested perry is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on die subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request, At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except razonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciaVndustoal. • Minnesota State Statute 519, 99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its Status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentatwe is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal, Staff is aim available to review the project with any interested person(e). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any cemespondence regarding the application wilt be included in the report to cite City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in Me report, lease contact We Plarinvo Staff person named on the noti5cetion. 0-upaa . ouls MP r ki jr CITY OF NK CIIA RSSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.ci.chanhassen. mn.us 0004i15 t1, This map is neither a legally recoM--' TjS 4Q §: 't r c as one. This map is a w city, county, state and fed %n is to be used for refere Geographic Information Syz='-t"'� the other dces�tre�sen9 'y �...b an other purpose r uinn r in the depiction of geograph q3%' y�i°k''- .ond please contact 952-227-1107. Thep �- 4 ` - r\�„r,'_f _.�uant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (20 ¢ ` r�r r 1�\ ...y acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any dam _„ iy waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold ham pity from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which agwe out 0f Ake use::' aoeF,s4 ar use of data provided. — : , ,: > 4 �PSFS POST R � PITMEY BOWES 021 P $ 000.460 0003195036 APR 062017 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 MISSION HILLS GARDEN HOMES 2681 LONG LAKE RD ROSEVILLE, MN 55113-1128 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start unto later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda, Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Proposal: Review with Variances for a 136-unit senior housing structure, 8 twinhomas (16 independent living units) and a daycare center. ; Applicant: S erides Reiners Architects, Inc. Property 8600 Great Plains Boulevard. Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is'to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input.from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the publi . , 4. Public hearing is closed and the Comrri ;dn discusses the project. If you want to see the plans; before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-07. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff Questions & by email at saljaffOci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. ! Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign u l City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be noted of the application in mining Any interested party Is invited to attend Uw meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pan of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly a partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, lard use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialhndustnal. • Minnesota State Statute 519,99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Oepartment regarding its statue and scheduling for the City Courtin meeting. • A neighborhood spokesparsaNrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s) • Because the Planning Commission hods the public heanng, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any coraspondence regarding the application will be included In the report to the City Council, ff you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Stets person named on the riclifiraticn.