Loading...
CAS-06_CHANHASSEN HIGH SCOOL - FILE 1 OF 2Office of Administration District Education Center 11 Peavey Road School Chaska, Minnesota 55318 District (952) 556-6100 Wk ...Prepanngaillearners to achieve their personal best January 5, 2007 District 112 New High School Neighbor: RECEIVED JAN 9 - 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Work on the new high school site will begin this month. One of our goals during construction will be to keep our school neighbors informed about our project being built by the intersection of Lyman Blvd. and Audubon Road. I'd like to invite you to an open house on Thursday, January 18, for all interested neighbors of the new high school. At this event you will be able to see renderings of the new high school, the layout of the site plan, and the anticipated construction schedule. Representatives of the school district, the City of Chanhassen, the architect firm, and the construction management firm will be on hand to present information, receive your comments and answer your questions. The open house will begin at 7:00 p.m. and conclude by 8:30 p.m.. It will be held at the Chanhassen Recreation Center, 2310 Coulter Boulevard. If you have any questions, either before the open house or at anytime during the construction period, please feel free to call me at 952-556-6261. I welcome seeing you on the 18's. Sincerely, Steve Pumper Director of Finance and Operations District 112 Serving the communities of Carver, Chanhassen, Chaska, and Victoria through equal opportunity in employment and education. y MEMORANDUM CITY OF CgAN�SSEN TO: Mayor & City Council 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: October 9, 2006 Administration Phone: 952 227.1100 SUBJ: Resolution Regarding School District 112 Bond/Operating Levy Fax: 952.227.1110 for a Second High School in Chanhassen Building Inspections Phone: 952,227,1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Attached is a draft resolution regarding School District 112 Bond/Operating Engineering Levy for a second high school in Chanhassen. Previous City Council's have Phone: 952.227,1160 adopted resolutions supporting the school district's efforts in educating the Fax: 952.227.1170 public regarding their needs to better serve current and future growth. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 My expectation is that the City Council review the draft resolution during the Fax :952.2271110 work session and then add it to the regular agenda for action. Park A Recreation Phone :952.227.1120 ATTACHMENT Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 1. Draft Resolution 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning 6 Natural Resources Phone: 952,227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Worth; 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.221.13i1(I Fax 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax 952.227.1110 Web She wwwoi.chanhassen.mn.us The City of Chanhassen - A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails. and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. h CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: October 9, 2006 RESOLUTION NO: 2006- MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION REGARDING SCHOOL DISTRICT 112 BOND/OPERATING LEVY FOR A SECOND HIGH SCHOOL IN CHANHASSEN WHEREAS, Independent School District 112 is one of the fastest growing school districts in the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, Independent School District 112's current enrollment projections predict that the high school will have 3,000 students by the year 2010 (300 over current capacity); and nearly 4,000 students by the year 2020 (1,300 above current capacity); and at the middle school level it is projected that 2,800 students by the year 2020 (800 students over capacity); and WHEREAS, the system of public schools is a cornerstone of quality in the community that has a positive effect on civic pride, property values and our overall quality of life; and WHEREAS, Independent School District 112, following an inclusive, comprehensive planning process, has proposed a bond referendum in the amount of $92.9 million to build a new high school in the City of Chanhassen, and a $3.0 million operating levy to open and operate the new high school; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen has previously supported Independent School District 112's acquisition of property within the city for purposes of building a secondary school in order to accommodate the district's student population growth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota supports these referenda initiatives of Independent School District 112, and urges residents in the district to vote in support of these referenda on November 7, 2006. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 9'h day of October 2006. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager li*d Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Rue CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 9, 2006 Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Lundquist, and Councilwoman Tjornhom COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Peterson STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Laurie Hokkanen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, and Todd Hoffman PUBLIC PRESENT: Kenneth & Lisa Peitz 6811 Highover Drive PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Furlong: Good evening to everybody here in the council chambers and those watching at home. We're glad that you joined us. At this time I would ask if there are any additions or modifications to the agenda as published. If not well proceed with that. First item, at our work session this evening the council discussed a resolution relating to the proposed referendums that Independent School District 112 is asking voters to address this coming election on November 70, and what I'd like to do at this point is summarize that resolution and then ask that it be added to the consent agenda for consideration. Independent School District 112 is one of the fastest growing school districts in the metropolitan area. Current enrollment projections predict that the high school will have 3,000 students by the year 2010, which is 300 over current capacity, and nearly 4,000 students by 2020, which is 1,300 students above current capacity. At the middle school level as well it is projected that there'll be 2,800 students by the year 2020, which is 800 students over capacity. We recognize as a council that public schools and the system of public schools is a cornerstone of quality within our city and has a positive effect on civic pride, property values and our overall quality of life. We also recognize that Independent School District completed an inclusive comprehensive planning process before it came to the voters and asked for this referendum, which includes a bond referendum in the amount of $92.9 million dollars to build a new high school here in the city of Chanhassen, as well as authority for $3 million operating levy to open and operate the new school. The City of Chanhassen in the past has supposed Independent School District 112 acquisition of property within the city for purposes of building a secondary school in order to accommodate the district's growth. As such the council this evening will add this to the referendum. Will pass a resolution supporting the referendum initiatives of Independent School District 112 and urging residents in the district to vote City Council Meeting - October 9, 2006 in support of these referenda on November 7, 2006. So what I'll do at this point is offer to add that to the agenda as item 1(m). Consent agenda item without objection. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Furlong: I know that there were some people that may be interested in talking about the Highover Trail project. Staff is recommending award of bid with the modified plan, eliminating the northern section so if there's a desire for anyone to speak on that, this would be the time to let us know. If not, we'll just proceed with the consent agenda. Okay. So is there any other item by members of council would like to separately discuss from consent agenda? No? Okay. With that, is there a motion to approve items 1(a) through (m)? Councilman Lundquist: Motion to approve. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Furlong: You both get on the minutes this evening. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 25, 2006 -City Council Verbatim & Summary Minutes dated September 25, 2006 C. Resolution #2006-71: Brenden Pond Stormwater Improvements, PW 420: Approve Quote: d. Resolution #2006-72: Orchard Green Project 06-04: Accept Streets & Utilities. e. Curry Farms Park Stormwater Pond Improvements and Utica Terrace Wetland Outlet Improvement: Approve Plans & Specifications and Authorize Advertising for Bids. Resolution #2006-73: Carver County Hazard Mitigation Plan: Approval of Resolution Approving Plan. g. TH 212 Off -Site Wetland Mitigation Area (OF-5): Approval of Wetland Easement. h. Carver County Joint Assessment Contract: Approval of Contract for 2007-08. i. Highover Trail Project: Award of Bid. 2 City Council Meeting - October 9, 2006 j. Pioneer Pass: Approval of Revised Development Contract. k. Approve Payment of City Share of Playground Improvements at Chanhassen Elementary School/City Center Park. Approval of Amendment to the Fire Department Relief Association Bylaws. in. Resolution #2006-74: Approval of Resolution Regarding School District 112 Bond/Operating Levy for a Second High School in Chanhassen. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 3 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: Todd Gerhardt: I'm reading the book 1776 so I'm going to start when Washington started his war. No. The only thing I'd like to talk with City Council tonight is, we're scheduling a tour of the water treatment plant and Liberty on Bluff Creek, and I just want to make sure that if we started that at 5:00, I believe it's on the 23rd, our next City Council meeting, if that would work with everybody. We'd like to run over to the water treatment site. Spend probably 20 minutes, 25 minutes there. Then move down to the 2005 MUSA area. Tour the east/west collector road down there. Show you some of the progress that contractor's made on that. And then stop off at Town & Country's development and take a tour of a couple of their models and then come back for our regular City Council meeting and then after that regular council meeting address anything that we would have scheduled for the work session, which would be budget presentations for park and rec, admin and fire station. Or fire department. And then an update on fire relief. Again, our agenda for the 23`d is limited. I think we've got maybe one or two agenda items for you to discuss and, but I thought right after the regular council meeting we could go into our work session. As our days are getting shorter for daylight I thought we'd better get the tour in now before we have complete darkness and you can't see what's going on. Planning Commission did this tour about 2 weeks ago and was very successful. Had a great time. I think the council would definitely learn a lot of what's going on out there and see some of this stuff that you approved. Mayor Furlong: Anybody know of any conflicts at this point? Alright, that's fine on that. Todd Gerhardt: Okay, I will send an email out just as a reminder of that. Also invite the press to attend and anybody from the public that is watching this, if they'd like to show up at City Hall at 5:00 and tour these facilities, we can do that too. That's all I have this evening. Had a quiet weekend with homecoming. A few little tp's and a few eggs thrown, but nothing too serious going on in the community. 3 City Council Work Session - October 9, 2006 sign up for the ACH program. Greg Sticha stated he would talk to other cities to see what has worked for them. Todd Gerhardt suggested inserting an educational brochure with utility bills. The council picked four winners for the $50 credit off their utility bills. REVIEW DRAFT RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE DISTRICT 112 BOND & OPERATING LEVY FOR NEW HIGH SCHOOL IN CHANHASSEN. Mayor Furlong reviewed the resolution of support for the referendum from the City Council. Councilwoman Tjomhom asked about public support (pro or con). Mayor Furlong stated the results of a preliminary survey will be released this week. Todd Gerhardt suggested putting the resolution on the consent agenda for approval. Mayor Furlong adjourned the work session meeting at 7:00 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim 2 S dwo( City Council Meeting - September 25, 2006 Marvin & Patricia Onken, 62221 Greenbriar Avenue: Approval of Variance Request for Use of a Single Family Dwelling as a Two -Family Dwelling on Property Located in the Single Family Residential (RSF) District. j. Resolution #2006-68: Appointment of Election Judges for the General Election. k. Approval of Ordinance Amendments to Chanhassen City Code: 1) Chapter 18, Subdivisions (Including Summary Ordinance for Publication Purposes) and Chapter 20, Zoning. 2) Chapters 1, 4, 7 & 13. 1. Award of Bid, 2006-2009 Audit Contract. in. Resolution #2006-69: Approve Resolution Authorizing Multi -Year Winter Trail Activities Permit with Three Rivers Park District for Minnesota River Bluff LRT Route. n. Resolution #2006-70: Accept Streets, Storm Sewer and Utility Improvements in Fox Den, Project 05-10. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: Mayor Furlong: If you are interested in coming forward I would ask, we do have a couple scheduled presentations this evening but at first I'd like to open it up for the, for anyone else that would like to address the council so, if you'd like to address the council during visitor presentations, this would be an opportunity to come forward at this time. Okay, seeing nobody. We do have representatives here this evening from School District 112 that wants to make a presentation and discussion with regard to their upcoming referendum so good evening. Steve Pumper: Thank you Mayor, council members and city staff. I'm Steve Pumper. I'm the Director of Finance and Operations with District 112 and along with me as well is Michelle Helgen our Board Chair. Certainly thank you for this opportunity to give us a moment to talk about the referendum that will be coming up on November 7`s with two questions. One question to build a new high school in the city of Chanhassen and the second additional dollars to operate that school as well. I'd like to take you through a presentation if I could. Mayor Furlong: Let's give it a minute and then maybe we can work on that and we'll take the other presentation, if that makes sense. Let's just see if we can get it up and going. That's going to take a couple minutes, maybe we should switch them, but stay right there Steve. If we can get it up, we'll do it quick. I tell you what, if they get that running, you don't have to necessarily switch to it right, so we can get that working. I'm wondering if we try to move on and maybe invite Mr. Cummings up to do his presentation. Steve, if you can wait while we get the technical stuff worked out. Hopefully we'll have that in a few minutes and well get you back on. At this time I'd like to invite boy scout Scott Cummings to come forward. He is proposing his Eagle Scout project on a trail in this city so. Good evening. City Council Meeting - September 25, 2006 Scott Cummings: Any questions? Mayor Furlong: Questions for Mr. Cummings. Councilman Lundquist: Good luck. Scott Cummings: Alright. Mayor Furlong: No, I think it's great. Thank you for doing this. I know I had a discussion with Mr. Hoffman, I know you sent those pictures ahead and appreciate that but overall I think most importantly with Councilman Lundquist and myself as fellow Eagle scouts, we appreciate the amount of time and effort it's taken for you to get this far, and wish you the best of luck and look forward to hearing about that Eagle Court of Honor coming up so. Scott Cummings: Alright, thank you. Mayor Furlong: Best of luck, thank you. Are we ready to go for the school district? Why don't you come on up and let's see what we can do here. Steve Pumper: I'm actually glad we're after this last presentation. I know now we can go to the Arboretum and probably build our school a little cheaper if we get... And if anybody has any business cards you want to... supply some supplies for cheap, that's great. Well, while we're trying to get this, let me just speak to, I think I can get the message out without having slides in front of us. I want to take just a minute before I talk specifically about the referendum. Just to give people a quick background of District 112. There are a lot of new residents certainly in the community and I think those of you who have been around for quite some time might be surprised at how quickly things change around here. District 112 supports all or portions of the communities of Chanhassen, Victoria, Chaska and Carver. We have 8,600 students right now enrolled in the district. 570 of those have English as their second language, so a different language is their native language. We're putting 41 different types of languages now that are spoken by the students in District 112. Approximately 87% of the students that we serve go on to post secondary education. We are the largest employer in the area, with over 1,300 employees. Nearly 600 of those are teachers. Right now we are a K through 12 student oriented district but we certainly support life long learners. Our kindergarten children are served in 3 different buildings. A majority of those are in our kindergarten center, and then we have kindergarten in 2 other buildings. Jonathon Elementary serves kindergarten students, and for the first time this year, right across the street from here in this building at Chanhassen Elementary we have 2 sections of all day kindergarten there as well. So that's certainly a trend that's growing, all day kindergarten and going into our elementary buildings. We have 7 elementary schools that serve grades 1 through 5. We have 2 middle schools that serve grades 6 through 8. One building, Pioneer Ridge Center that serves our 9th grade population. And then one high school that serves our students who are in grades 10 through 12. What I'd like to show you, what I'll just give you verbally is the capacity issue that we're facing right now. This referendum, as you know, is to build a new high school. However our most immediate need is for space for our middle school students, who again students who are in the grades 6 through 8. Right now we City Council Meeting - September 25, 2006 have 2 buildings. Chaska Middle School East and Chaska Middle School West, each with roughly the capacity of 1,000 so 2,000 student capacity is our buildings for grades 6 through 8, and we have over 1,900 middle school students right now. Next year we'll actually exceed 2,000 so well be out of room in our middle schools next year. The reason that's important is, as we build the new high school, the plan is for the new high school to be a 9-12 building and Chaska High School to be a 9-12 building. Oh, I can actually, we'll get to this slide here then. No, that's not going to show too much there but this represents what our capacity is at the middle schools with a referendum that would be unsuccessful. The straight line around the 2,000 number would show our capacity. That's our building capacity and this line right here shows our student growth, and again if it's clear enough, you can see that we're almost at, our student growth and capacity is almost at the same right here and by the year 2020 you'll see where we're approaching 3,000 students, so rapid growth at our middle school level. With no new buildings our capacity would be certainly underneath what we need. This graph right here will show. Mayor Furlong: Point down there because that's what everybody is seeing at home. Steve Pumper: This graphic here will show what would happen if the referendum is successful. Again we'll have capacity of 2,000 until we hit school year 2009-2010 when the new high school would open and then Pioneer Ridge would convert to a 6-8 building. Then our capacity jumps up to 2,700, and again if you'll see the line, it almost takes us with enough capacity to the year 2020. And then at that point in time it looks like it will be under capacity again. Here's what it looks like for our high school. Student enrollment and building capacity. Once again with a referendum that is not successful, we have capacity between Chaska High School and Pioneer Ridge, that covers all our 9-12 students, of 2,700. Right now we're slightly underneath that but, and again it's been a couple years we'll be exceeding capacity and again by 2020 we'll have roughly 1,000 students per class, so 4,000 students of building capacity of 2,700. If the referendum is successful, we'll have 2 buildings that will have capacity of 2,000 each so you'll see that and again as it opens in the fall of 2009, our building capacity will jump to 4,000 and that should handle our 9 through 12 enrollment until we get to the year 2020. The process has been a long time coming. Actually it began prior to this, the referendum that we held in 2003. If you recall in 2003, along with the addition to Chaska High School and opening up Victoria Elementary School, we asked the voters for approval to purchase land in Chanhassen, specifically for the construction of a future secondary school. At that point in time the Board hadn't made up it's mind whether it would be a middle school or a high school. Since that time we have involved community members, leaders throughout the community, parents, family members who don't have children in our schools, in numerous public meetings and we asked them the question, is 1 high school and 1 campus, or 1 building and 1 campus to serve 4,000 students the right way to go? Or is it to have a second high school so we have smaller schools with 2,000 apiece? We conducted focus groups. We had surveys done. The Board reviewed all that feedback and it was very, very clear by the community, listening to them, that they preferred that we have 2 smaller schools and converting Pioneer Ridge into a third middle school. So back to spring, that information was again discussed by the Board and the Board created this proposal now to construct a second high school on the land that we already own located at the Audubon and, Audubon Road and Lyman Boulevard intersection and then convert Pioneer Ridge into a third middle school. Here is an aerial view of the site. Right here is Audubon Road and right here is Lyman and then in this shaded area right here is the land that we own that we plan on City Council Meeting - September 25, 2006 constructing a second high school. This is Lake Hazeltine right here and here's industrial development right across the road. This is a slide of the design right now with the school superimposed on that site. So again a little tougher to see here on this display but again up on the higher area, and again I think council is aware of the site. It's a very hilly site and we will have multiple levels to go with the building but we have a building here. We have parking surrounding it. There's over 1,000 parking spaces. We hope to have a separate bus access coming in from Audubon, off of Lyman, and then we're still in discussion with city staff about having 2 more entrances off of Lyman Boulevard as well, again to access the site. You'll notice that we have multiple fields around the site including a football stadium with track. A baseball field. Several softball fields. Several soccer fields. Multi purpose fields as well. Tennis courts. As many fields and activity areas as we can get in the site, we're trying to develop right now. This is a preliminary design but I believe when it's all said and done, the school will look more like this drawing then not like this drawing. Certainly there's some changes and there's some things we're working through with staff as well. The number of fields, the type of building, etc will be very close to what Chaska High School has right now. The total cost of the referendum, we have two questions on there. The first question is to actually build a high school, and based on our drawings and our planning, the number that we need to get from the voters is $92.91 million dollars. That construction cost of roughly $185 per square foot. When we just completed the addition to Chaska High School and Victoria Elementary, it cost us roughly $165 per square foot. Construction inflation over the last 2 years has run in excess of 7 1/2 percent each year and if you take the 165 and multiply it by that inflationary increase, you'll be at the $185 number so I think we're designing the facility at the same level as we've designed our most recent buildings. The second question asks for operating funds to open the building. These operating funds are for core costs which includes staff that are not student dependent, such as principals and nurses and custodians. It also includes core costs for maintaining the fields outside. For the utility costs of the building, etc.. The numbers projected to operate the facility in the fall of 2009 are in excess of $3 million dollars. We're asking for a per pupil increase of $285 which will generate approximately $3 million dollars a year. These two questions are contingent upon each other. If one fails, they both fail. And the reason we are asking and tying these two questions together is that we find it very prudent that we need operating funds in order to open the building. We don't want to sacrifice from our current educational programs the dollars that we need to operate what we currently have to operate this separate building. There's history in District 112 when we actually constructed Chaska High School and converted Chaska Middle School West, the old high school, and did some renovation there. We had an operating referendum at that time and it failed and we were not able to have any funds then to open that building, so that building sat vacant until an operating referendum was eventually passed. The impact on individual taxpayer, if both these questions pass. If you take a $300,000 home, which is the average value of a home in District 112, the estimated tax increase in taxes payable in 2007 would be $377. To find that specific tax impact on your home or farmland or commercial/industrial land, if you go to District 112's web site, so www.Districtl12.or¢, there's a tax calculator right on line. You can plug in the value of your property. Indicate what type of property it is and it will tell you your tax increase for next year. When will the decision be made? On general election day, November 7`' and once again both the building is contingent on the passage of the operating referendum. The building would open in the fall of 2009 so at that time we would have a new high school. Actually almost 2 new high schools because Chaska High School would convert to a 9-12 building at that point in time, and then we'd have another 7 City Council Meeting - September 25, 2006 new building at Pioneer Ridge which would convert to a 6-8 building. What happens if the referendum fails? Well we're out of space for middle school kids so immediately we need to start looking for space to house our 6th to 8tb graders. Again those of you who have lived in the area long enough know that that's happened to District 112 in the past and we've had students in shopping centers and some vacant retail space and so we'd look for options like that again. Certainly secondary class sizes would be at risk. We know students are coming. We have to find a place to put them. If we have a limited number of classroom spaces, that means we have more students within any given classroom. Why does this matter to me? Well there's a multitude of reasons. Continued growth certainly beyond 2020 is expected in District 112. We have a reputation for high education in this area. High quality education in this area. It attracts young families. We need to provide adequate classroom space if we want to have quality schools, and certainly quality schools have tremendous impact on the value of property in any given area, and it has just tremendous value to support economic development and to continue growth in the whole area and support the quality of life that residents of Carver County have come known to enjoy. What we ask is for anybody listening to this presentation or who will be out voting on November 7d is become informed on the issue. There's multiple ways. There's plenty of presentations been going on. The great sources of information can be found on our web site, again www.District112.ore. Our superintendent has kind of ventured his toe into the technology world and he has an information blog on that website as well. You can go there and be linked to that and there's a lot of information on there. People can ask questions and get answers on that site. There's a referendum hotline. If you call the number that's listed there, you'll get a call back within 24 hours to be able to answer the question that you asked. And then we also have an information clinic on October 9`s at 7:00 that's going to be held at Pioneer Ridge Freshmen Center and our architects will be there. Our construction manager will be there. District staff will be there. Board members will be there. Superintendent will be there to answer any specific questions people might have. Again we want people to be informed to make their yes or no vote based on correct information. And with that I'd certainly entertain any questions with you but I just wanted to thank you for allowing us to come speak and have the time in front of you tonight. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. ...the question I heard from a resident was a question regarding, and understanding the timing and tying together the two questions of the referendum but the question was on the timing when the taxes may be charged to the property tax statement. Between the two and the question was on the operating question, whether that would be, whether they'd start paying taxes for the operate away or if that would wait until the school actually opened. Can you respond to that? Steve Pumper: I can Mayor. The timing of that, it would be for a 10 year operating referendum levy and that would start with taxes payable in 2007. So yes, they would feel that impact before the school opens. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Is there a reason for that timing because the question was why you need to start collecting the money before you have the increase. Steve Pumper: Well... valid. It's important for us that we have the authority tied to the piece of property so again we don't develop a building before we collect the operating referendum. City Council Meeting - September 25, 2006 Mayor Furlong: Understand. Steve Pumper: And we only can ask that question on election day. No other time of the year, and so before we'd start construction, we'd rather know whether or not we're going to have an operating levy or not. And since it's tied at that point in time, then that's when the 10 year starts, our 10 year compound starts clicking. Mayor Furlong: Ms. Helgen, yeah. Michelle Helgen: Yeah, the other piece I would like to mention is because this is typically not with all referendums and what we've done in the past, there's always that, there's basically this kind of a year lag where you're collecting the operating money, but we have already hired the principal and we've hired the staff because what has to, the administrative people ahead of time because what they have to do is put together basically all the teachers and all the operational plan over the course of that year so that they're ready to hit the ground running in the fall when the building opens. So you need that now. On the other hand, what we have also done in the past, we haven't used all the operating money that year prior to the school opening so we put some of that aside and then used it for some of the start up costs which are inevitably greater when the school first gets going that first year or two. So we've timed it based on that but they're definitely costs before the building is opened that we will incur from an operating standpoint. And the operating funds are really, they know that's not the teachers salaries or anything like that. It's basically is all the administrative, the extra administrative overhead to hire the principals and nurses and you know, all that kind of thing to operate the building and then once the students come and you've got the per pupil revenues, then that's what pays for the teachers and other staffing and that kind of thing so. The only other thing I'd add to what Steve said was, you know I've been on the board now for 6 years and I was here 3 years ago when we had the referendum, which is when we purchased the land in Chanhassen for this secondary school, and at the time the board was very clear that whatever the secondary school was going to be, it would be put on that land. And I think the voters wanted to know exactly you know what our intention was and so I think it's important that we follow through on that. More importantly perhaps is at that time we talked about this secondary school, our current projections at that point said our classes would peak out at about 800 students a class. So what we said at the time was, if these projections stay as they are today, which was 3 years ago, at 800 students a class, then this site would basically become a secondary school that would become a middle school and we'd stay with one high school. If the projections went over 800 a class, then we would move to two high schools, and that was the decision that we had made 3 years ago. We now are looking at in 2020 in our high school classes being at 1,000 students with fairly conservative numbers. I mean you can look at our demographers projections. She has about 3 levels of numbers that you can use to project and this is we definitely used a conservative model. But the interesting thing is, not only is it 200 students a class more at this point, we don't know when the growth stops. She only projects as far out as 2020, but at this point she's not projecting that there would be a decline at that time. There could be, you know the growth is definitely in this area at this point. In 15 to 20 years there will also be significant growth out in the western part of the county and you know at that point you may someday, who knows be looking at 3 high schools. But at this point our numbers were such that it definitely tipped it in the sense that we felt we had to go to 2 schools, City Council Meeting - September 25, 2006 1,000 students a class is really bigger than most of the districts, really all the districts even around us at this point. At their peak numbers have not been 1,000 or more a class so, I just think that a history is important because we have said that at the time and the board has basically followed through on those initial plans that we put in place. Mayor Furlong: Okay, good. If we can, because I don't even propose to know all the questions that people have but can we repeat the dates of that informational meeting? Steve Pumper: Yes. Mayor Furlong: As well as how people can get more information if they're watching because just these comments might have generated some more questions at home. Steve Pumper: October 9 h, which is a Monday. 7:00. It is an information clinic, and that's at Pioneer Ridge. Our district web site pretty much will link you to everything else. Will give you the referendum hotline number and the blog, etc is www.districtl 12.ore. Mayor Furlong: Great. Thank you very much. Councilman Lundquist: Mr. Pumper, a couple questions. As I've been out knocking on doors, a lot of the questions I get I think are around the differentiation between the operating levy and the building piece of that, and of that 377 or whatever that number on that average, how much of that piece is the operating levy piece versus the building? Steve Pumper: The operating levy, and I m sorry I'm not a little more prepared because I can't give you an exact number but the operating levy is close to 150 of that 377. Councilman Lundquist: Okay, so it's about 40°% or 35°% or something like that. And that, how did the rest of the schools that are currently open, we have some operating levies on those but the rest of those are funded on the per pupil? Steve Pumper: To a point, yes. And it would take a long time to get through of course the whole amount of educational funding, but for instance right now we have levy authority for roughly $780 per student, and the reason that number has, or it wasn't always that high was because of operating levies that we have increased as we go from like Victoria Elementary. As we go from Bluff Creek and as we go from Clover Ridge. So those stay in place then as we continue, so really this operating referendum that we're asking for will stay in place for 10 years, and if that gets renewed, it will continue so really those dollars per pupil are really what keeps the buildings open. Councilman Lundquist: So that piece we should expect in 10 years from now that we'll have another referendum to redo that? Steve Pumper: Very possible, yes. That's typically what happens. 10 City Council Meeting - September 25, 2006 Councilman Lundquist: And all of that piece. And then one of the, on that operating referendum I think one of the stats I caught when you were doing that is 1,300 total plus employees. But only about 600 teachers. So you've essentially got less than half of your total employment force is actually teachers that are there and the rest of that is other support services and things like that. Steve Pumper: Yes, and let me just talk a minute on that. Certainly some of that would be administration and some would be custodians, service staff, etc. A large portion of that, and I don't have the number in front of me though, is our community education staff, and the majority of our community education staff are part time employees who teach, you know the classes that you go to at night, or there's certainly LTGCFD classes in preschool and other courses that we have but of the 1,300, I would say that we have probably 800 full time employees and the rest are all part time staff. Councilman Lundquist: And are those community ed programs generally self funded or at least partially self funded? Steve Pumper: Yes. There's separate funding for those. There's no, none of this operating levy as an example would go to support any community ed programs. Councilman Lundquist: Is that a pretty comparable number to other, at least the ratio, comparable number to schools in the area? Comparable to Eden Prairie and that range? Steve Pumper: Yep. And actually I think our ratio is probably a little bit higher in teaching staff versus total staff. Councilman Lundquist: Okay, good. Thank you. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor I have one question. Some of the concerns that I've been hearing in the community is that the outdoor facilities and the indoor facilities with the high school may be different than the current Chaska High School. I think during the presentation you mentioned that they would have very similar type activities. Almost the same or, can you address that? Steve Pumper: Sure, the plan is to run in exactly the same co curriculum programs. The spaces for those facilities might vary slightly but for instance we have 6 basketball courts, or phy ed courts in the Chaska High School right now. The design for this school is 6 courts as well. We have one football stadium and we have one football stadium here. So absolutely, they mirror each other as close as they can be. The layout will be different because you know, as we built Chaska High School we just were limited as we added on. You know time and time we'll see some efficiencies in this building actually how some of that space is laid out, but this includes a theater that would seat the same number of students, or similar patrons, that we have in the theater at Chaska High School as an example. So the amenities will be nearly identical. Todd Gerhardt: Thank you. Councilman Lundquist: Good luck. I 1 1 I t 1 1 1 November 3, 2006 CITY OF CHONSENEnvironmental Assessment Distribution 1700 mAd Boulevard PO Box 141 Chanhassen, LAN 5211 Re: Chanhassen High School Aulnuntsbation Environmental Assessment Worksheet Phoriie- %2221.1100 Fax 952 22111 IQ The City of Chanhassen is transmitting the enclosed Environmental Assessment Building Inspections Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed development of a high school campus within Pixine %2221.1180 the City of Chanhassen. A 94-8 acres site, that is generally bounded on the south Fax 952 271190 and west by County Road 18 (Lyman Boulevard), on the north by the Twin Cities Enginevi g and Western Railroad, and on the east by Bluff Creek in Chanhassen, Minnesota, Phone 9522271160 is proposed for development of a 405,000 square foot high school and campus to Fax: %2221.11 /a be open by the fall of 2009_ The EAW describes the plan for the high school Finance campus. The agency review deadline is December 6, 2006_ Plow %2.221A 140 Fax: 952227.1110 The public will be given an opportunity to comment.on the 'EAW for the proposed Park & Recreation project at a public meeting to be held November 21, 2006 at Chanhassen City Phase 952227.1I21) Hall. Public comments on the proposed project will be acceptedby.the City Fax 952227.1110 through December-11, 2006.Comments should be submitted to -Robert Generous, Itecoff AICP, City of Clianhassen, P. O. Box 147, Chanhassen, N /W 55317-:014 2310 Cwllilef 7, Boulevmd - - - , Phone 952M 1400 telephone (952) 227 1131, fax (952) 227 1 f 10, or via a -mail at - Tax 952227.1404 bgenerousC&ci.chanhasseil.mn.us. Planning b Natural Resources $lnCe Phone. 952227 1130 - 6u 952.2271110Lr-s..[ti(11...�� Public Warlls- 1591 Park Road Robert Generous, AICP : Phone. 952.227.1300 Fax: 952221.1310 Senior Planner - Senior Center $nclosure - Phone :952221.1125 Fax: 9r2227.1110 Web Site - www ri danfassen mn us The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with dean lakes, quality schools, a charming downlo`m, Timing businesses, winding hails, and beautiful paiks. A gnat place to live, work, an `1 i 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to preparers: This form is available at http://www.egbstate.mn.us. EAW Guidelines will be available in Spring 1999 at the web site. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for — but should not complete — the final worksheet. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. The complete question, as well as the answer must be included if the EAW is prepared electronically. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title: New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen 2. Proposer. LSD 112 Contact person: Steven Pumper Title: Director of Finance and Operations Address. 11 Peavey Road City, state, ZIP: Chaska, MN 55318 Phone: 952-556-6261 Fax: 952-556-6269 E-mail. punTers@district112.org RGU.• City of Chanhassen Contact person: Robert Generous, AICP Tide: Senior Planner Address. 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 City, state, ZIP: Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: 952-227-1131 Fax: 952-227-1110 E-mail: benerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 1 4. Reason for EAW preparation: (check one) EIS scoping X Mandatory EAW Citizen petition RGU discretion Proposer volunteered 1 1 If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number: 4410.4300, subpart 14.b.3 and subpart name: Industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities Proposed project exceeds 300,000 square feet of new institutional construction. S. Project location County: Carver County City/Township: City of Chanhassen SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 15 Township 116North Range 23West and NW 1/4 Section 22 Township 116North Range 23 West Attach each ofthe following to the EAW.• • County map showing the general location of the project; (See Figure 1) • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); (See Figure 2) • Site plan showing all significant project and natural features. (See Figure 3) 6. Description a. Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor: ' In order to accommodate projected growth, ISD 112 proposes to build a new high school in Chanhassen to be located on undeveloped property northeast of County Road 18 (Lyman Boulevard) ' and north of Hazeltine Lake. The proposed high school will be constructed to accommodate 2000 students, and related school developments will include adjacent parking and numerous athletic fields. The school is projected to open in Fall 2009. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. The proposed project will be constructed on a land parcel approximately 94.8 acres in size, that is ' generally bounded on the south and west by County Road 18 (Lyman Boulevard), on the north by the Twin Cities and Western Railroad, and on the east by Bluff Creek (see Figure 4). A total of one building will be constructed. The building will be 3 stories (portions) and have a footprint of 242,400 square feet. A total of 1,153 automobile and 30 bus parking stalls are planned; bituminous parking areas will be constructed for these areas that will encompass approximately 379,500 square feet (see Figures 5 and 6). Traffic will enter and exit the proposed facility from Lyman Boulevard at three separate points. The following improvements must be in place at the opening of the high school turn lanes in both directions on Lyman Boulevard at the north entrance to the facility and at the intersections of lake t Hazeltine Drive and southbound Audubon Road, and the Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection must be signalized. A traffic study was conducted as part of the project environmental evaluation. The results of the study show that the level of service will be negatively impacted without roadway improvements. ' Three wetlands exist at the site, totaling a total of 24.2 acres. A total of 1.66 acres of wetland are anticipated to be impacted (filled) prior to construction activities. Mitigation measures will be performed as required by Minnesota wetland rules and the City of Chanhassen. Utility construction will include extensions for potable water, sanitary sewer, electrical power and natural gas. All utility construction will be extensions from nearby existing connections. Storm water t runoff will be collected, detained and treated to preconstruction standards, and discharged to Bluff Creek. The property where the construction is proposed to occur is currently in agricultural use, and a remnant farmstead (outbuildings only) on the southern portion of the parcel. The farmstead buildings will be demolished according to state and local rules, and associated underground structures (wells, septic system) appropriately abandoned. ' Erosion and sediment control will be managed during construction activities through development and implementation of a Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). This plan will include specific measures to be taken to minimize water quality impacts to nearby surface waters from ' sediment carried by storm water during construction. The SWPPP plan will contain details of Proposed storm water protection measures, including Best Management Practices such as crushed rock aprons at entrances and exits, perimeter silt fence, stock pile protection, construction staging, and. ' temporary basins. r IfIs L_ ) Wastes generated during construction will include only unsuitable soils and normal construction debris associated with new construction. Waste streams generated after school operations have begun are anticipated to include primarily mixed municipal waste, with building maintenance activities anticipated ' to generate minor amounts of regulated waste. The proposed timing for the project envisions the start of construction in Spring 2007, with completion ' by Fall 2009. Construction activity phasing is anticipated to be grading (Winter 2006), building construction (Summer 2007), parking area and road construction (Fall 2007), and athletic field construction (spring 2008). c. Explain the project purpose: if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of the project is to build a second high school within Independent School District 112 to ' accommodate observed and projected increases in local population growth. The project will be carried out by Independent School District 112, and the direct beneficiaries will be high-school aged students (grades 9-12) and their families. A referendum to fund the construction of the high school is scheduled for November 7, 2006. d. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to happen? _Yes X No Ifyes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, ' timeline and plan; for environmental review. N/A ' e. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? _Yes _X No Ifyes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. ' N/A 7. Project magnitude data ' Total project acreage 94.83 acres Number of residential units: unattached N/A attached: N/A maximum units per building: N/A Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space): 405,000 total square feet ' Indicate areas of specific uses (in square feet): ice: N/A Manufacturing: N/A Retail: N/A Other industrial- N/A Warehouse: N/A Institutional. 405,000 square feet Light industrial: N/A Agricultural: N/A Other commercial (specify): N/A Building height: 3 Stories If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings: ' The proposed structure is generally consistent with existing construction in the vicinity of the site. The nearest buildings visible from the site are the back sides of one- to two- story buildings across Lyman ' Boulevard in the industrial park, and two-story residential housing approximately Y. mile to the east of the site (across the Bluff Creek Preserve). Residential housing to the north of the site is generally screened from view from the site by trees along the railroad tracks. 8. Permits and approvals required. List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees; Tax ' Increment Financing and infrastructure. Unit ofeovernment Type ofaolication Status Federal US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Wetland Permit To be submitted ' State Minnesota Pollution Control Agency NPDES Construction To be submitted Stormwater Permit Sanitary Sewer Extension To be submitted Permit Unit o overnment Tape ojapplication Status Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Extension Permit To be submitted rWell Sealing Notification To be submitted ' Regional Metropolitan Council Sanitary sewer connection permit To be submitted Can ' Carver County Work Within Right of Way To be submitted Approval Local Riley/Purgatory/Bluff Creek Watershed District Grading Permit To be submitted City of Chanhassen Rezoning Approval To be submitted Conditional Use Permit To be submitted Wetland Conservation Act Permit To be submitted ' Site Plan Review To be submitted Interim Use Permit Submitted for (preliminary site grading) review Variance To be submitted Demolition Permit To be submitted Building Permit To be submitted ISD 112 Bonding Referendum Election 11/7/2006 9. Land use. Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands- Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses- Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazards due to past site uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid ' or gas pipelines. Current land use within the parcel boundaries is agricultural (row crops) and grasslands/wetlands, and -a ' remnant farmstead currently exists in the southern portion of the site. Review of historical aerial photographs also document this land use to at least 1940. The residence previously located at the farmstead was reportedly removed from the site when the electrical substation was constructed in 1988. I L 4 Ll ' Historical land use of adjacent lands is primarily agricultural, with comnercial/light industrial development beginning to the south of the site in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Residential development is has been constructed to the north and east of the site_ The proposed project does not raise any significant compatibility issues with nearby non-residential land uses, as this nearby land use (commercial/warehouse) does not store or use large amounts of hazardous substances that could be released during an emergency situation. Also, the proposed school is considered ' compatible with nearby residential land uses. A buried 12" liquid petroleum pipeline, owned by Magellan Pipeline, approximately bisects the site, running mostly east -west across the site. Although no buildings will be constructed within the pipeline right-of-way, the presence of this operating liquid pipeline presents a potential hazard both during construction and ongoing building operations. Care will need to be taken during construction operations to make all construction contractor employees aware of the presence of the pipeline. This will be done during the construction phase through use of pipeline location highlighting on all relevant construction plan sheets, construction field flagging of the pipeline, preparation of a spill contingency plan, and ongoing awareness at project management meetings during construction. After construction, the pipeline location will be ' identified by physical signage, notations on building layouts, and training of building grounds employees. Additionally, the school will develop an emergency evacuation/response plan to plan for unforeseen emergency situation related to a pipeline release. ' Potential environmental hazards were identified in a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) performed in 2004 at the property (related to the remnant farmstead) in the form of regulated waste associated with planned demolition (e.g. asbestos, lead paint, waste fluids and containers), possible historic on -site disposal of farmstead wastes, and possible fill materials that may contain regulated substances. Also, the Phase 1 ESA identified an unused above ground storage tank at the remnant farmnstead; it is possible that soil and/or groundwater contamination exists as a result of past uses of this tank. Detailed investigation of these potential hazards was not performed as a part of the Phase 1 ESA; these hazards will be further evaluated (and mitigated, if necessary) as part of demolition activities and prior to site grading activities in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and local rules. ' l0. Cover types. Estimate the acreage of the site with each of thefollowing cover types before and after development. Before After Types 1-8 wetlands 24.6 acres 26.4 acres Wooded/forest 2.53 L4 Brush/Grassland 5.1 6.5 Cropland 62.42 0 Lawn/landscaping 0 33.53 Impervious surfaces 0.18 24.5 Other (storm ponds) 0 2.5 TOTAL 94.83 94.83 if Before and After totals are not equal, explain why: Not applicable 11. Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources a. ldentifyfrsh and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be affected by the project Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was contacted for review of federally listed threatened or endangered species within the project site. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, no federally listed or candidate species are documented on the site. A majority of the project site has been disturbed by cultivated agricultural land uses (currently used for com production). There are clusters of trees and shrubs on the property. These wooded areas provide habitat for birds (blue jays, warblers, nuthatches, chickadees, grackles, crows) and for small and larger ' mammals (small rodents, rabbits, squirrels, foxes, raccoons, opossum, deer) that are typically found in and at the edge of the urban landscape. Four wetland areas have been delineated on the Site (see Figures 7 and 8). Wetland "A" is a 6.03-acre Circular 39 Type 2, 3, 6, and 7 wetland complex located along the northeastern border of the site. This wetland is dominated in the swales by reed canary grass. Willows and cattails are also found in this wetland complex. In the shrub and wooded portion of the swales, box elder, cottonwood, elms, and willows are dominant. Wetland "B" is a 17.94-acre continuation of wetland "A" which is located ' along the southeastern border of the site with a finger that extends across the site and to near Lyman Boulevard. Wetland "C" is a 0.23-acre Circular 39 Type 2 wet meadow located along the southwestern border of the site. This wetland is dominated by a near monotypic stand of reed canary ' grass. Portions of this wetland also contain cattails, willows, shrubs, and deciduous trees. Wetland "D" is a 0.4-acre area along Lyman Boulevard in the central portion of the site and is dominated by com and nightshade with reed canary grass in the ditch. The wetlands provide habitat for some aquatic life (such as invertebrates and amphibians) and provides edge habitat for the other bird and mammal species mentioned previously. The wetlands also provide seasonal habitat for waterfowl. ' Additionally, a 1.50-acre conservation easement connects wetlands "A" and "B" along the eastern border of the site_ The project site is adjacent to and west of one of the three parcels of Bluff Creek Preserve and is adjacent to and west of a City park. According to the City of Chanhassen, the preserve creates an important wildlife travel corridor in the center of the community. The proposed project site is near Bluff Creek. Efforts to minimize impacts to the creek are explained in detail in question number 17. The proposed development scenario consists of more intensive land uses compared to the existing land uses. The more intensive uses will result in changes in vegetative cover (see question 10), including conversion of much of the agricultural land and some of the wooded portions of the study area to suburban cover. The majority of the wetland areas and the entire conservation easement will be preserved. Portions of wetlands A and B and all of wetland D will be filled for a practice field, an access road, a parking and to create a walking path between the bus parking area along the southwest comer of the high school to the existing pedestrian path in the adjacent park; however, mitigation will occur on site. Mitigation locations are planned in the extreme southeast comer of the property as well around the four storm water ponds that will be constructed on -site near the existing wetlands (using Public Value Credits). Public Value Credits may be issued due to the "establishment or preservation of upland buffer areas contiguous to replacement wetlands, restoration of partially drained wetlands, and creation of stormwater detention areas." See Minn R 8420.0541, subp. 6. Some of the vegetation impacts will be mitigated by plantings of native trees, shrubs, and perennial plants planned as part of the proposed development. The developer will work with City staff to identify the appropriate quantities, types, and locations of plantings during City staff review of the landscape plan for the proposed project. Mn/DOT plans to perform wetland mitigation activities immediately east of the project site (in the Bluff Creek wetland complex) as off -site mitigation for wetland impacts from the new construction of nearby Highway 212. These activities will include remeandering of a portion of Bluff Creek, vegetative restoration of portions of the wetlands adjacent to Bluff Creek, and blocking the vacated ditch/channel of Bluff Creek after remeandering is completed. There are no anticipated changes in ' stream hydrology or wetland boundaries as a result of these mitigation activities. Some of the planned Mitigation work to be done by Mn/DOT is planned to be completed within the ISD 112 site boundaries. As a result, ISD 112 is currently negotiating with MrVWT to allow Mn/DOT to perform their mitigation work on ISD 112 property. 6 i 1 I 1 11 1 Wetland habitats will be protected as a result of the City of Chanhassen's wetland buffer and setback ordinances. Classified as agricultural urban wetlands, current buffer requirements range from 16 to 20 feet from the delineated wetland boundary, and setbacks for any structures are 40 feet. Existing wildlife populations may concentrate at the remaining "natural" habitat areas on the site (declining in numbers if they stay in the remaining, smaller natural areas on the site), or they may adapt to the new suburban cover types, or may migrate to nearby natural habitat locations. During construction, appropriate setbacks will be maintained and silt fencing will be installed on the portions of the wetlands with the potential to receive construction runoff. The installation of silt fence will minimize the effects of sedimentation and ensure that the wetlands are not altered as a result of the construction. Preserved wooded areas not already protected by silt fence will be protected by tree preservation fencing. b. Are any state -listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site? _Yes X No Ifyes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: ERDB# 20070286 Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources was contacted for review of their Natural Heritage Database (ERDB# 20070286 ). That review is included as Attachment A. They have indicated that there are no known occurrences of rare species or native plant communities in the project area. 12. Physical impacts on water resources. Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration — dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment — ofany surface waters such as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? X Yes _No Ifyes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s) if the water resources affected are on the PWI. Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. Of the total 24.6 acres of wetland present within the project boundary, approximately 1.66 acres of wetland are proposed to be filled for an access drive, parking lot and a practice field (see Figure 9). None of the impacted wetland areas are MN DNR-protected waters (see Figure 10). The impacted wetlands are labeled as portions of Wetlands A and B (described in more detail in Question 11 above), and the proposed fill locations are shown on Figure 9. A total of 3.33 acres of wetland area are proposed to be created as on -site mitigation (at a 2:1 ratio) for these filled areas (see Figure 9 for mitigation locations), and these wetland impacts will be permitted through MN Wetland Conservation Act processes locally administered through the City of Chanhassen. 13. Water use. Will the project involve installation or abandonment ofany water wells, connection to or changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including dewatering)? X Yes No Ifyes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply affected changes to be made, and water quantities to be used; the source, duration, quantity and purpose ofany appropriations; and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation permit numbers, ' if known. Identify any existing and new wells on the site map. If there are no wells known on site, explain methodology used to determine. The proposed project will require connection to the City of Chanhassen's municipal potable supply system. The City of Chanhassen obtains its potable supplies from 10 water supply wells that produce water from the Prairie du Chien/Jordan (7 wells), and glacial sediment aquifers (3 wells), and are permitted by the MN Department of Natural Resources under appropriation permit number 816089. 7 Li The City has indicated that its potential aquifer supply, and pumping and storage capacity is adequate to accommodate these increased demands without additional wells or off -site infrastructure improvements. Trunk water main must be extended along Lyman Boulevard to facilitate the looping ' of water for the high school. Water usage in the school building for the proposed facility is estimated at 50,000 gallons per day during the school year (approximately 10 million gallons per year); this total number is based on the ' MN Plumbing Code requirement of 25 gallons per person per day for this type of facility. Additional water will be used for exterior (irrigation) uses to maintain the grounds and athletic fields. In order to reduce the demand for potable water for irrigation, all sprinkling systems will include rain sensors to ' prevent sprinkling during rain events. Interior water use will be at its peak during the school year (September through May), and drop off significantly during the remaining summer months. It is currently unknown whether construction dewatering will be necessary during excavation of the proposed building and related utility construction. Given the site topography, building locations and subsurface geology, is appears unlikely that groundwater will be encountered and thus require dewatering of excavated areas. Temporary ponded water from precipitation events during construction will require removal; this dewatering activity does not require MN DNR Appropriation permitting but will be addressed (and potential impacts designed to be mitigated) within the MPCA-required Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). 14. Water -related land use management district. Does any pan of the project involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100-year floodplain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land usedistrict? _X_Yes No If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions. The eastern part of the site abuts the FEMAdelineated 100-year tloodplain along Bluff Creek, as well as the City of Chanhassen's Bluff Creek Overlay District (see Figure 11). However, no buildings will be constructed within these areas, and construction activities will be outside these boundaries. The project will maintain compliance with the shoreland protection ordinance since the proposed project is within 300 feet of Bluff Creek and may be within 1,000 feet of Lake Hazeltine. The required Conditional Use Permit application will detail conformance with setback, impervious surface, and natural habitat preservation requirements of the overlay district. Therefore, no incompatibilities are ' anticipated with these land use restrictions. There are no state- or federally -designated wild or scenic river land districts in the project area. ' 15. Water surface use. Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? _Yes X No lfyes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other uses. The proposed project is not anticipated to change the number or type of watercraft on any body of water. 16. Erosion and sedimentation. Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved.- 65 acres; 730,000 cubic yards. Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe any erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after project construction. The upland areas of the site are mapped by the USDA as Hayden loam (Ha designation on Figure 12) with slopes varying from 2 to 40 percent. These soils are considered well -drained but listed as severely erodible, and the steepest slopes occur on the eastern portion of the site. Thus, these soils must be stabilized once disturbed to prevent erosion from precipitation runoff. At lower elevations in the upland areas are Terril loam (Te designation on Figure 12) soils with slopes ' varying from 0 to 6 percent; these soils are moderately well -drained and are not readily erodible. Also present at these lower elevations are Lester loam (La designation on Figure 12) with 2 to 6 percent slopes, and which is moderately well drained and is has a moderate erosion hazard. I At lower elevations at the site, soils are listed as deep peat and muck (Pd designation on Figure 12); these areas represent the larger wetland areas to the east of the site. Typically flat -lying, these sediments are prone to erosion of disturbed. Erosion and sediment control measures will be required to be detailed in the Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) required by MPCA that must be completed prior to construction and implemented before and during construction. The SWPPP plan will contain details of proposed storm water protection measures, including Best Management Practices such as crushed rock aprons at enhances and exits, perimeter silt fence, stock pile protection, construction staging, and temporary basins. ' Project permitting by the City of Chanhassen related to mitigating possible construction storm water impacts also includes a separate interim use permit, which will require detail and commitments regarding timing of site construction activities, construction sequencing, measures to be taken to avoid wetland impacts, storm water routing and temporary ponding. 17. Water quality. surface water runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe permanent controls to manage or treat runoff. Describe any stormwater pollution prevention plans. Current storm water flows from the site occur as overland flow to ditches and adjacent wetlands. Currently in agricultural use, there are no known measurements of water quality of storm water flows at the site, nor does the current land use require formal storm water management or permitting. City of Chanhassen rules require that permanent storm water flows to receiving surface waters meet predevelopmem flow water quantity and quality standards. National Urban Runoff Program standards were used to develop storm water pond sizing; a total of four storm water ponds to be located at the site are shown on Figure 13. Site ponds were also sized to accommodate the planned road upgrades to Lyman Avenue. Therefore, potential water quality and quality impacts from permanent storm water flows will be mitigated through design and construction of storm water improvements specified by City rules. Potential storm water impacts to Bluff Creek during construction will be controlled and mitigated through the construction SWPPP permitting process described in more detail in Question 16 above. b. Identify route and receiving water bodies for runofffrom the site,- include major downstream water 1 bodies, as well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoffon the quality ofreceiving waters. The receiving water for storm water runoff from the site is Bluff Creek. With an increase in impervious surface coverage and no infiltration areas proposed, stormwater volumes will increase; however, stormwater discharge rates will be required to meet predevelopment discharge rates. As discussed above, water quality is anticipated to be improved compared to previous uses, and so no water quality impacts to receiving waters are anticipated. 18. Water quality. wastewaters a. Describe sources, composition and quantities ofall sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. Only sanitary wastewater is anticipated to be generated upon completion of the proposed project. ' Estimated sanitary wastewater produced from the site after operation is anticipated to be 50,000 gallons per day, based upon estimated indoor water consumption. b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies, and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on -site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems. No wastewater treatment will take place on -site; sanitary wastewater will be conveyed to the MCES Blue Lake wastewater treatment plant for treatment and discharge. c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. Wastewater flows will be conveyed to the MCES Blue Lake wastewater treatment plant, which ultimately discharges to the Minnesota River. The treatment plant discharges are regulated by NPDES Permit k MN 0029882 issued to MCES by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Representatives of MCES familiar with the Blue Lake plant were contacted, and stated that the existing treatment facility has the current capacity to treat the proposed flows, and that the type and volume of these additional flows will not jeopardize the discharge limitations of the facility. No treatment plant or collector interceptor improvements are planned due to the anticipated increased flows from the proposed project. d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique and location and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems. No liquid animal manure will be generated or need disposal as part of the proposed project 19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions a Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water. 25 minimum: 5 Average depth to bedrock. minimum: 375 feet; average: 425 feet Describe any of thefollowing geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestoneformations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. The bedrock geology beneath the site is characterized as the eastern portion of a buried bedrock valley that drains to the south to the Minnesota River. Elevations of the bedrock surface range from approximately 500 feet above mean sea level (under the western portion of the site) to near 600 feet above mean sea level under the eastern portion of the site. The buried bedrock valley contains subcrops of the Ordovician Prairie du Chien Group, the Cambrian Jordan Sandstone, and the Cambrian St. Lawrence and Franconia Formations (in descending order). No shallow limestone formations exist beneath the site, nor are karst conditions or sinkholes known at the site or in the area (see Figure 14). The glacial materials overlying the bedrock are mapped as glacial till deposited by the Des Moines lobe (see Figure 15). This till material is characterized as yellow -brown loam to clay loam, containing sand and pebbles. These deposits also may contain pockets of silt, sand or gravel. These glacial deposits are not generally known to be associated with subsurface hazards. Groundwater under the site occurs both in the glacial materials and in the underlying bedrock aquifers. Groundwater in the glacial materials occurs at shallow depth due to the relatively impermeable nature of the glacial sediments, and gradients are anticipated to generally reflect the surface topography. No domestic water wells are known to be present at or near the site that produce from glacial materials. Bedrock aquifers are the primary source of potable water for the residences and businesses in the area. These wells are over 200 feet deep, and their static water levels are approximately 100 feet below ground surface. The thickness and composition of the glacial sediments overlying the bedrock aquifers serve as natural protection for these aquifers from releases at or [tear the land surface. (r b. Describe Ike soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. The details of the soils mapped at the site are described in Question 16 above and are shown on Figure 12. The Hayden series soils, which cover much of the upland area of the site, are generally range from silty sand to lean clay in composition and have a permeability of under 0.2 inch per hour. Their well -drained character makes them somewhat susceptible to filtration of surface contaminants. The other upland soil series (Terri) and Lester series) are moderately well -drained and are also susceptible to infiltration of contaminants. Mitigation measures will include preparation and implementation of a Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, as well as development of an emergency contingency plan after construction is completed. 20. Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks a. Describe types, amounts and compositions ofsolid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation. Identify method and location of disposal For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there is a source separation plan; describe how the project will be modified for recycling. If hazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments. Demolition waste from the remnant farmstead will be generated prior to construction, which will consist of concrete, steel, and various building materials. Asbestos -containing materials (if present) ' will be inventoried and will be removed prior to demolition and disposed of appropriately in a licensed landfill. Lead -based paint and other hazardous building materials that may exist (e.g., fluorescent lamps, light ballasts, mercury switches, appliances, fuel, paint, etc.) will also inventoried and will be 1 removed prior to demolition and disposed of according to state and federal rules. Nonhazardous demolition waste will be disposed of in a demolition landfill. Excavation, removal, and disposal of any contaminated soils (if encountered) will be done in ' accordance with prior MPCA review and approval. Solid waste generation for the completed project will consist almost exclusively of mined municipal waste generated by school activities. Volumes of municipal waste are estimated at 10 cubic yards of non -compacted waste per week, waste collection will occur six times per week during the school year. Mixed municipal solid waste will be hauled to a sanitary landfill by licensed waste haulers. Source separation (recycling) of cardboard and recyclable solids (commingled paper and consumer recyclables) from the mixed municipal waste stream will be performed under a plan to be developed by the School district. These recycled materials will be picked up weekly. b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. Ifthe use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission. No toxic materials are anticipated to be present at the site in any significant quantities during or after construction. Small amounts of hazardous materials (e.g. cleaners, boiler chemicals, herbicides, paints, and maintenance supplies) will be present and will likely create a small waste stream of hazardous waste. These materials will be stored, used, and disposed of according to state and local rules. Hazardous materials, in the form of fuel, vehicle -related materials, and certain construction materials will be on -site during construction, but will be present in relatively small quantities and will be stored in conformance with regulatory requirements. I c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials, except water. Describe any emergency response containment plans. The project is planned to utilize two petroleum storage tanks (for fuel oil and diesel fuel) to support facility operations. The fuel oil tank will be a 10,000-gallon underground fiberglass tank with electronic monitoring and double -walled underground piping. This fuel will be piped to the boilers and is designed to serve as backup fuel for the boilers in case of natural gas supply interruption. The diesel fuel tank will be a 2,700-gallon, skid -mounted above -ground storage tank, piped to a 1,500 KW diesel -powered electrical generator to be used to provide backup electrical power should the normal power supply be interrupted. Emergency response plans for releases from either fuel storage tank will be included within the emergency evacuationtresponse plan. Also, due to the capacity of the diesel fuel storage tank, a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan will be prepared and implemented. 21. Traffta Parking spaces added: 1,153 Existing spaces (ifproject involves expansion): 0 Estimated total average daily traffic generated: 3,420 trips Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (ifknown) and its timing: 1,408 from 7:30-8:30 a rrm Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss its impact on the regional transportation system. A detailed Traffic Impact Study (TDI, Inc., dated October 2006) was prepared for the proposed Chanhassen High School and is here incorporated by reference. The following discussion is based on the findings contained in the Traffic Impact Study (see Figures 15-18). Traffic Congestion Based on the calculations in the Traffic Impact Study, the daily traffic volumes on the roads affected by the development will be: Daily Traffic Volumes (with the existing roadwav network) Roadway Existing 2005 2010 No -Build 2010 Build 2030 Build Lyman Blvd west of Gal in Blvd 5,600 7,200 8,100 11,300 Lyman Blvd northwest of lake Hazeltine Dr 5,000 6,500 7,700 10,800 Lyman Blvd west of Audubon Rd South 9,100 11,000 13,100 18,300 Lyman Blvd east of Audubon Rd South 13,400 16,200' 18,3 00 25,600 Lyman Blvd east of Audubon Rd North 11, (00 14,500 15,900 22,300 Oral in Blvd north of Lymn Blvd 3,200 3,500 3,800 5,300 Audubon Rd South south of Lyman Blvd 12,400 15,100' l5,100 21,400 Audubon Rd North north of Lyman Blvd 3,600 4,700 1 5,400 7,600 Daily traffic volume is near capacity t Daily traffic volume is over capacity 12 J Traffic Improvements Based on the analysis in the Traffic Impact Study, the existing roadway network will accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed Chanhassen High School if the following mitigation measures are implemented by opening day of the school: • Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection. • Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for the • addition of a north leg to the intersection. • Construct the following turn lanes: I 11 1 - Approach Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane Southbound Lyman Blvd at North School Access Bypass lane Northbound Lyman Blvd at North School Access 200 feet Westbound North School Access at Lyman Blvd Through lane becomes turn lane 300 feet Southbound Lyman Blvd at Lake Hazeltine Dr 200 feet Northbound Lyman Blvd at Lake Hazeltine Dr 200 feet Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Dr at Lyman Blvd 100 feet Westbound Lake Hazeltine Dr at Lyman Blvd 300 feet Build through/right Eastbound Lyman Blvd at Audubon Rd S 200 feet Westbound Lyman Blvd at Audubon Rd S 200 feet Northbound Audubon Rd S at Lyman Blvd Build to add through lane Southbound Audubon Rd S at Lyman Blvd 200 feet Build through/right In addition, operation of the Lyman Boulevard/Gaplin Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road North intersections should be monitored for potential improvements. Both intersections will likely require traffic signals and additional mm lanes in the future. Impacts to Regional System The following corridors will be at or over capacity in the future whether or not the high school is built. They should be monitored and appropriate improvements should be made when needed. Lyman Boulevard east of Lake Hazeltine Drive • Audubon Road South south of Lyman Boulevard 22. Vehicle -related air emissions Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult EA Guidelines about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed. Traffic on the area roads will increase (details described in the TDI, Inc. traffic study) even under the no -build scenario. However, traffic volumes will also increase due to construction of the proposed project Consequently, there will be increased vehicle -related air emissions particularly during peak trip generation times (7:30-830 a.m. and 2:30-3:30 p.m.). Five intersections were examined to determine their "Level of Service' (LOS). LOS A represents light traffic flow, while LOS F represents heavy Bow (over capacity conditions). Generally, air quality is only impacted if an intersection is severely congested (LOS E or LOS F). Based on the predicted morning and afternoon peak traffic hours, if the Lyman Blvd/Galpin Blvd intersection and the Lyman Blvd/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersections are signalized, it is not anticipated that the traffic increase due to the school will exceed air quality standards. t 13 LI 23. Stationary source air emissions. Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EA Guidelines for a listing) and any greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone -depleting chemicals (chloro-fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or suer hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. Heating of the buildings will be done through use of three natural -gas -fired hot water boilers, each rated at 8.4 MBH (total of 25.2 million BTUs/hour). The boilers are designed to rum on natural gas or #2 fuel oil (for emergency beat). An on -site back-up power generator will be powered by diesel fuel, but its use, and therefore its emissions, will be very limited No significant hazardous air pollutants are associated with this use, and consequently no air pollution control devices are planned to be installed. ' 24. Odors, noise and dust I ill the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation? _X_Yes _No If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify locations ofnearby ' sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life (Note: fugitive dust generated by operations may be discussed at item 23 instead of here.) Minor amounts of fugitive dust are anticipated to be generated by equipment during construction. Odors may also be generated from construction equipment exhaust. Equipment will include trucks, backhoes, scrapers, bulldozers, loaders, and compressors. Waste will be controlled by weekly clean-up of the construction site, and water or other dust suppressants will be used to control airborne dust when necessary. Noise, dust and odors from construction activities will be limited in duration, and will be controlled by limiting the hours and days of construction operation to those permitted by local ordinances. Once project construction is completed, it is anticipated that the project will not generate significant dust beyond current site conditions since all disturbed areas of the site will be covered with either hard surface or turf/landscaping. After construction activities are completed, noise will be generated by increased traffic. To a lesser extent, outdoor events (e.g. athletic events) taking place at the site will create noise but the hours of ' such noise generation will be controlled by the school event staff. Noise from both sources above will generally be during daylight or early evening hours. i_1 Given the location and topography of the proposed site, there are no significant sensitive receptors immediately adjacent to the site to the east, south and west for either traffic noise or event noise. Residential housing to the north and east of the site will be subject to some additional noise in the form of loudspeaker and crowd noise during athletic events. These events are relatively infrequent, and the hours of such noise generation will be controlled by the school event staff. Therefore, there are no noise mitigation measures proposed. 25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? _Yes X_No Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? _Yes _X_No Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? X_Yes No Scenic views and vistas? -X Yes —No Other unique resources? X_Yes No if yes, describe the resource and identify any project -related impacts on the resource. Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. 14 Designated parks, recreation areas or traits? The project site is adjacent to and west of one of the three parcels of Bluff Creek Preserve (at the northern portion of the site) and is adjacent to a park (at the southern portion of the site). As ' mentioned in question number I la, a walking path will be created to link the high school to the existing trail in the park area. The trait connections will require wetland impacts that will be mitigated on the site. ' Scenic views and vistas: The construction of this project will present a new feature to the view from and to Bluff Creek Preserve as the current project site is predominantly developed as cultivated agricultural land. In order to minimize impacts to scenic views and to preserve open space, the majority of the parking lots will be located along Lyman Boulevard, thus maintaining a visual corridor along the northern portion of the site. Other unique resources ' Two large wetland complexes are present along the eastern portion of the project site. Potential impacts to this wetland complex are discussed in items 11, 12, and 17. Additionally, Bluff Creek is near to the proposed project site. Bluff Creek is a unique natural resource. The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD) by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low -impact practices. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. Disturbed areas adjacent to Bluff Creek and to city park land will be restored with native vegetation. Additionally, the project is designed to not only meet existing standards for storm water and construction water runoff, but the project is designed to exceed these standards. Additional protective measures will be added during construction, and a treatment -train approach will be used to ensure that Bluff Creek will not be adversely impacted by the project. (See question #17 for additional information.) 26. Visual impacts- Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare from intense lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks? ' _X_Yes _No Iyes. explain. Visual impacts will occur from the presence of the school and associated structures in a previously predominantly agricultural area. Visual impacts will also occur from building, parking lot, field, and stadium lighting. The City'g Zoning Ordinance contains information that addresses outdoor lighting. This project will adhere to the lighting conditions contained in the zoning ordinance as well as the requirements for buffer yard plantings around the perimeter of the site. 27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulation& is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of local, regional, state or federal agency? X Yes _No. lfyes, describe the plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any conflicts will be resolved. If no. explain. ' The City of Chanhassen has an adopted local comprehensive plan. The current zoning of the site is A2 (Agricultural Estate District); the site area is shown as Office/industrial and/or Office/Institutional on the Chanhassen 2020 Land Use Plan. Rezoning is required for the proposed project The rezoning will be consistent with the land use designation (see Figures 19 and 20). The City of Chaska also has an adopted local comprehensive plan. The current zoning of that portion of Chaska immediately adjacent to the site is Planned Industrial Development, (PID-1); this area is shown as Industrial on the Chaska 2020 Land Use Plan. This industrial park is already essentially built out, and so no near -term land use changes for this area are anticipated. The proposed project is not inconsistent with the adjacent Chaska land use plans (see Figures 21 and 22). 15 1 I The City of Chanhassen also has an approved and adopted water resource plan, and the proposed project will be subject to the requirements of this plan, as well as other development ordinances contained in the City Code. There are no conflicts anticipated. I28. Impact on infrastructure and public services. Will new or expanded ladities, roads, other infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project? X Yes ('yes, describe the _No. new or additional infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EAW, see EA Guidelines for details.) Road improvements (turn lanes and signalization) must be constructed in concert with the proposed ' project to serve the project and accommodate increased traffic volumes. These improvements are described in the traffic study (TDI, Inc., dated October 2006). ! Connections to the City's potable water and sanitary system will be made from nearby existing connections. As part of the development, truck water main must be extended along Lyman Boulevard to facilitate the looping of water for the high school. No other public infrastructure or services are required to serve the proposed project. 29. Cumulative impacts. Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item 8 requires that the RGU consider the cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EAWin such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential forsignificant environmental effects due ' to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form). No cumulative impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The proposed project is not anticipated to induce any specific related development or impacts that will cause cumulative impacts. The area to the south was previously reviewed under a separate Chanhassen 2005 MUSA Alternate Urban Areawide Review which was completed in December 2003. 30. Other potential environmental impacts lfthe project may cause any adverse environmental ' impacts not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. There are no known or anticipated environmental impacts that have not been discussed elsewhere in this EAW. 3 L Summary of issues Do not complete this section if the EA is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EAW. List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. The most significant potential issues associated with the proposed project are: 1. Traffic: There will be temporary impacts to vehicle traffic due to construction -related activity during excavation, construction materials delivery and storage, and tie-ins to existing subgrade utilities. These predicted vehicle traffic impacts will last for much of the construction life of the project, and will be geographically associated with the phasing of construction. Some of the potential impacts can be mitigated through implementation of City ordinances relating to hours and days of operation, noise, nuisance conditions, etc. r 16 I Post -construction traffic impacts are anticipated after the project is constructed, and are detailed in the traffic study. These impacts are anticipated to involve slight decreases in Level Of Services (LOS) in the project vicinity. Plants for mitigation of these impacts include adding ran Lanes and signalizing of nearby intersections. 1 No tic impacts or issues have been identified that require further investigation_ additional ' 2. Wetland Impacts: A total of L66 acres of wetlands are proposed to be filled as part of the Project. Mitigation measures will include on -site replacement (new wetland creation, as well as public value credits) according to MN Wetland Conservation Act odes, which are administered by the City of Chanhassen. No additional wetland impacts or issues have been identified that require further investigation- 3. Storm Water Runoff: There is potential for impacts to Bluff Creek and associated wetlands from temporary and permanent storm water runoff. Potential impacts from temporary storm water nuoff include those from sediment loading during and immediately after construction. These potential impacts will be mitigated through MPCA storm water and local permitting. Potential impacts from permanent storm water munoff include those from performance of storm water engineering design and construction. These potential imnpacts will be mitigated through local review of design plans, as well as on -site inspections during wmustna:tion. 1 No additional storm water impacts or issues have been identified that require further investigation . RGO CERTIFICATION. The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor. I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. '• The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60, respectively. • es 0 FA are�g sent to the entire EQB distnbution list f Signature �� /03/8� Date iTitle rho-vsn 0�,- L ` Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at the Administration Department For additional information, worksheets or for E,IW Guidelines, contact Environmenal Quality Board, 658 Cedar St, St Paul, MN 55155, 65 t-296-8253, or ht�J/www.cgbsta[e.mn.us 1 L7 ISO 112 EAW i r 17 w I i 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1] Ll j 1 1 I 1 1 I i I I 1 [1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 r SM B R A V N Schematic Design Site Plan Prepares Prepared August 24, 2006 DATE: Environmental Assessment Worksheet ICIB NO NT E RT E C New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota DRAWN By JMJ 3 NI Inc. 1 14 late / ' �c4 l ' i .. .. .y '), r ''g\o. ,10.J. -qa�\.'� sue.::. �:r _,_tea ad ' ,Yt • jai � , a 1. V;' � 16. • H - . ���i'�. „s� :f Yam•.. 1 ai-r=- ._a 43� r rf i i ��a• aa' �. a 4,,�, y J . I `y N $'` i � � E '2004`Ewvoa Tochr�olo0ios f � usr, i !.'t ?'2606 Na'.loci r AORA oB No: BL-06-04? SCALE: ADMIN HOUSE eAra .. q VOCAL GYM era PW • NrCF Dom Imam e. ----------a i;,, COMMONS CR CR CR CR 01ww CR CR CR CR CR w OR i� 1 i , _I 1 r 0� CR CR w Ago at CR .. w.- 7EA11 ' .A w = q1 - TFAM OR OR OR CR FACE FACE CR OR Or -m W-ftrft ► w. eCeC LAX F LAN 1/1e t/el w 1=1 SCIENCE HOUSE 1IN sM B R A U N First Floor Plan Schematic Design Prepared by Romboom Miller Architects, Inc. Prepared August 24, 2006 DATE: N T E RT E C Environmental Assessment Worksheet Oa NO BL-06-04539 New ISD 112 Figh School in Chanhassen FIGURE NO: Chanhassen, MN DRAWN JMJ 5 BY: Ys vrw<,I.I� en"a �W ti_R_.e v tiMF � uaa sm B RAY N I NTE RTEC 1�sf� ti/w1f .:naN Views of North and West Elevations rreparei Prepared August 24, 2006 DATE: Environmental Assessment Worksheet JOB No: New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen Chanhassen. MN DRAWN BY. iIN West Elevation Views v Roaboom Miller Architects, JMJ 1 6 I 1 11 1 Ll 1 r r40 Meeh'4 °fQE , tarR_ A,PEaC- aEy( +Kuw > fre4 a FEW rufr MA. 1 - "E �T EEvsr, r711 l _ .c wi R • AMC I..a, KM> v- 4IL s 'tNfA�ft �'r 'yRf, rENr4 �c1AAi f �l �yy ^.31C 'A LMw �A1• rw. rtMi, r}yEI rEtixe rtN: N .-fcx, M.>a rCfR nr.,f.J FEW _ 1 d �°'E rcr tff:.7g refs Approximate a Q-rEr,c. iy ^svE A rcdFf Site Location p (J ' rE'Jff R B c1 � Q �-Vt l T 4 IVY Kw" r@1(: rtF•u RPAr _ hMC "i. "yIM�U rrar! n Pt W f.ME yl YY RNA ,� .R�rs� �' r:M:• "EMi PM PfGE '.' Arfei r ftw_^b--WA FLW ". bar ... w &CAu lotJV.3 Q F 1'BrF—� RMC �� � i rc4F W 9 rEM'J ruu. P*..(. �RMlE� \ wi rEw 1 y r �'Ip trmr. C i 7:1 nNV RM[f'�'% M 1 flMt , �EfK� Ei fi YN� ` 'FEN Mw Mwa 1'Ew a INS sM B R A IJ N National Wetlands Inventory NWI Ma DATE /i9/2oo6 Environmental Assesment Worksheet l BL-06-04539 N T E RT E C New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN SC scALE FIGUF DRAWN BY JMJ 7 9�4 i V RAILROAD ti__ WETLAND'A' (6.03 Acres) l✓ CONSERVATION EASEMENT (1.50 Acres) Aetland D LYMAN BOULEVARD - WETLAND'S' (17.94 Acres) WETLANO'C' (0.Z3 Acres) C• C._ -- ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION LAKE HAZELTINE DRIVE AUDUBON ROAD SM B RAU N I NTE RTEC Delineated Wetlands Environmental Assessment Worksheet New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota NO: DRAWN JMJ ar Q In I- Approximate Mitigation Locations Approximate Fill Locations sRauN INTERTEC ,A ® � I y I 'O BLHOU•_L' P Ypp�r F�1 �I sm Proposed Wetland Fill and Mitigation Locations Environmental Assessment Worksheet New ISO 112 High School in Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN 0 t MRF 9 w• i S!J l 'aw 21Sji� 1 i•t i a . // w•.e.., q IC.IiA/IMAS.9EN � Nl 0. '°, 17 `` <:>•:. Approximate ' ' ' •'� ;; She Location saw a i II .::' A. �� •relnn \ p$ 14 i CHASKA to 27 \� bn•IM WI , 2OW . LEGEND i - ' ,r - erina w♦ ieinDlbe wiM • Yenbr an0 Dw btM i _4 _- 10 � ':.. ::; j. - lercouraiOen ♦a re Wbe we" a M•.y, ewR M ly:j y< fit w .: •::!�Ar .. — !odic ebtlw «.iMnlMM wiM.eaMe Dr. - .tyi ,:.: ' ..otail•DNialWri: - MwniDM wiM •n.mbrane tlq Mt«"W". ., I= .• �� � �.. ^Y.•" .. :;: � `'+': ..`•,, _ tD Tl:a.rwp b irD•nep far car wiM i rparr. erc.iP ' I i., y :..1D M� D.•Yn.TM1lwMarip•ItM p•twMewitr Doelia n n al�:: ::: :.: .��'�. ,c;:;.. •Do.rnm Uianwp •r. pbtltl M•Kwwalpaipmii "'.'::,ti. d., mwwww wiM 1D• mip irab. M w♦ ara ap e• fi e R 23 W w•iimat♦. A ww•cl♦e wil« ieeY twvMary fe"n eieaa w ww♦r rnwR M Dw t as of ,. w DODa •a D ad T Mrftou SDNA $K.iD11 ct /es.3] irtl b ew♦rn:re DxaueD 01111 fi.10 mpc. Don w aur.•f. L ' A01M•e wwwf wW w.WW w•« bpM. MYne aN•Stw.In 5-MM 1e5.42.~ repire. OW ® pant a DDIeYI•e D•IDi♦ rr W�p inP ill•ri4in in tlw eelwr, airwltrwm-aicDmollMrwirn. Can Ma Dr DIDI enc♦ ti w «♦i W Mlle. irla.r.w •I ' tie, i _ B R A V N gM Protected Waters and Wetlands Inventory PWI Ma Environmental Assessment Worksheet DATE: 10/1912006 New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen oB Na.BL-06-04539 N T E RT E C Chanhassen, MN SCALE: 1"-1 Mile FIGURE NO: DRAWNJMJ BYr: 10 U 1 1 i 1 1 t'\ Prr 02 I Go laD1 Tr,- i1HCf Ina t GG\ GI� L r APProximate �.- e0Location:_. Lpc? � ( :"'YIHi• I LHHrrJ ' 'Ia I J 2 �1 1 / t Ts i42 N . <'%�•t �� \ 1 � L Sri" rlat: H<AZELTINE LAKE 5M B RAU N INTERTEC .4 a1 :•+^•Ir'rmw IkR rum.11eq ! M.. 0[ M r•-1 wW .tieJ.aiw �o l d w q« R+e W ]<!a•aR ur+ P b wY I tb[ A9 RrkY•amJZ - A,.a[i.+, A.v 1}f�T.a r+• 4 rk w.►.a Mr rmr. R.+4a«+♦.•.Iro.+ tll K' „I eaL, 4 V3 a.1. M•L l ♦ - LLf Prwlu-+a.yr...W Yea. <.. ]f ar.•n •M.a. K� MY•.1 .mW 1.�rp Hw♦n+aax rw [:.♦m..♦r v.Na ar.+a W,)m !n `MuM.Jycvroa an.♦:Mka K♦A Kmr ar.nJrl�llm)�. wa h c«e'•In.l xd+l M+J K..•n,.aW lm., •> J.re+. m_.. ' y 4 fnNv, ...sr a4aYT n.T>^♦r'r'+ fa.An+InhrYw If "ud[vrs L..r.+im.< ..Aqa _ - r.:•Aan..J.�a:.�..J.a..vr a++ lael le+u ia.. ]p L[ne... Jre;.nA.: �.L p Ilcwow.nlgm GP •+.N �.ee•Gp i,w..n .ka«. :lL6. rel'! +.r.l 4e mb+.ev r]p..xw+ Gtl CLL.rsmn a•.a. sri. bay,. lu ey.<w fT 1 wYM I)w lfi.x^a1J Jwa4 L11 ++-E♦x.m.1..+.a4.. )p Li..r<.0 ..,.-_ Y.n [vw+.ar r•..aF bw,O e]p.....•r 1♦R] k+e l ...Y... .aas L � e.5+w <Yr. 0 sue" �w •:C c d artmx +4a_uw�l +f. 41 i IOwvm'.4«+ w Yv+n e.c ... ♦.,ww 4... ep n�.... w... x. ww pm, 14 o.wm I - u.n�,Ap: xar A VJs....♦r.lar l.a reO �`' f �. ;.°;e^<^♦ •J Ir w[..<' y+.+amuMt +I+wew h nn..e vL..•af.<.rr wb. ... .. Iu [s.l.wn k�#q...-sr,0 •lam+++ _ .Mw. Rmn'r Jww+a Yatl +n ♦ae fn'.♦nw h I,mro.,..r.Y,ks •,d .,, :I�w,..�: r. eww�.M.. S fYi roe )ufewuf +kan •W r,IJe tyr +ae Mu 9prtw +b:. wq) py r�lpLq<w rr�.:N1 } •.osr Wr�a�4J ..0 �pJm lam, Ap l]rpw Ja>+ 9 %vW s4 LaaJro +44' •uFw �.Pp l)rw.^.T^aY) Yvfm-tw.iesa.lurir.... Ik0 )b♦i.rYs. +4 Vasw+kaa+ 4'J ^) YaMia+r.rsVl}u lL c-"' IR'!l Na. YaL r%p V raaw aMm .+i-1 - m )..ate.. w.....a. . lass r.+..p .. ... na..•-Jr... �..... w r.w.. ,;,"` - M Soil Survey Map Carver County Soil Survey a Environmental Assessment Worksheet PDRAWN JBY 10/19/2006 New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen BL-06-04539 Chanhassen, MN FIGURE NO: JMJ 12 r1 L sefaDvm, saTwr t\e swa se. �m W.+sar..\.�.ew ssae p..+oanao �a®.wnTe wL7lA. nTDDa.nwgw.a.aa.m wr•�s>eweesvr pc lONLi1T iTMNWI �� R' v rn F.oa can nu.rw M. rnxom.s ra mmxw eeDwsx\eiswrr ar® wvo ep.wy nmco..�.eran wer a�iw..reo n»o ICVOeIVCl DOr1a11M1 D\vi 1Vn•IleoaYe i11 FVN.�ubl� A YaiAmT !a Da\Teie 1M\Tl11 WMYLTMrt lame s.eDwn srnD ew�> w wn pt\utaa�eT k nnaNm \ W \D \ I[alATp finee\TIe! SM B R A U N Grading Plan and Storm Water Pond Locations Srading Plan & Storr Environmental Worksheet Assessment DATE 10/-2 N T E RT E C Proposed Chanhassen High School oB No BL-00E Chanhassen, Minnesota DRAWN JMJ BY: 3 11 1 i i 1 1 i u 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i ■ olya's dePVOiMMaaa>KJ-ISlmrrmcacJimm+wnum�g of dak. C r L ,.A,: DT RIRION OF MAP SYMIll WvA�wDkek drained ad wdraiucd Dn: apd mvtk. CcmmnnlY { •y a t ` - e..on-v�.umdr,om vw rm�.snv.*sv+xwmlvc. found m dtyiessiom DetwRv WLLs,.h eoll;aed eWnxb. W tl me.®mua oru.r.ul nmerw. In ds Doodpl.io. In IDc fkmdpl•in W. wn mmsms MnlY of i,''� �• r.t ..ter S.f-W�r•wmaowvxn•aa.em aovmwc.. owrDank aal rtckala udimens. Whore mapped on alluvial ( I ( r edam.- Ww dsk et wlmn nv..J camas. Wm (sae. 34 and 35. T. 116 N. k 23 W.k this unit includes , { { o�la�•�k..�e.0-_x.c,m. m+xay.vJoa; wterial deposited in,cekarcov reepafe fm. kYrOalky dfmm ofdparbiu m trtn arm mn la eeatul6prlO (rdda•aee) S'cahk thidmev of a®dy loco l�S �( mlly..l m nure ct.md. m Iwmy sand h ril26 cla) Iwm: very emrsv' 12 ilq, ). r •", -�.._ tC�pt.Ya Iw.Inn.Em6em dn. eomaim » mmh n 26 pereeat .Wk p.vage. 12 pemenq: =� rn0apxd.hmmaYV lopogtghy. Dtyomadb,.1 mcstscm saarwtr-lsM1mra Om.Mnmm.pravpnIF. on by ON=. Mimd in ilrl fora ady acl. fnafyrygw mq.mmu(n... ce.m<I. nurhJiyiny Olh HIf1-n9r/4p4b -Till u aDOve; len poly dnsbptl nrevlc 6.10 mMI.. rma Spnml J Ilai.iopped Wlls: hwe k): ovval1 «lief atom 1 W fat (3U r .- .yy . vkem.ri. rmrn+uiiw: Aa:.Ju.l eua w m.owd. —� ,tiers):., wllapred chsn,sl, _ yl Qth p Wet bdm-ryaloen pl4rmpl :e len (I amrml Jbv-rdiaf dWh,-Till asW,l. level Io rvlllne surface '� �l t deep. meropamnnvniou Lma.ax Jin. v.,.a mpopm by; mvall rtlkf whom 10 fl O --k smep Pullin madry. IN fal(55 mr,rtrI Itxk Wu iu ®ypkxr by .hick hpniu of vnd and g cl. •tif• 'I •b xA nn(mrm araw)sr ueM nrY1-AMIt.m.tit. Aml S. 1y m (FlrYtoemel I.om� m uvdy loam: pdD:y; W ckels of.ile, - r. { aee� .. , Ya saed, aM gavel lI plwu nvengc a u (" , ofde my tvnc ®� r i k ^ and (maim ialudis erycocks alline r164 pmeeml. larbtv.. Urn roc--h ` `. •,� ! / sJ / ks (26 pexentk aJu nd le (mfmcnla (IU peeeenO. Ilntt l ♦ 1 Q coverod inp DY,escom'ouv aemer ofuM and Pawl. I-•� ^ X j ?-Wl _ _ 1 Ymn� p•omiam riaP. a _• •----ice--• --r•� ��•�1 - !'. 9tl' YYr•+AI.. / CIS � .,-rl'b.� rt { i r sm B RAU N INTERTEC rIrj Approximate 5' QI ��� IMF W., Site Location B fti�.I i Iasi f �, .t � r;• .fr Suficial Geology Map Environmental Assessment Worksheet New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN � 1 � Surficial toe No: BL-06-04539 SCALE: FIGUF DRAWN Bv. JMJ 15 v •- V Lyman Blvd �,.•' Twin Cities & .•'•••• ° •,. Western RR,. a Q Lake Hazeltine Dr Lyman Blvd 9 0 I 13 4D0 11L100 a c v s° 3 N aj a Q LEGEND ■ 2005 Average Annual Daily Traffic Volumes Source: MNUOi'iraHKYiomw.aps w' 1�1 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes SM B R A U til Exisfing Daily Traffic Volumes Prepared by TDI, October, 2006 DATE Environmental Assessment Worksheet JOB NO BL-06-04539 New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen N T E RT E C Chanhassen, MN FIGURE NO: DRAWJMJ 1 16 BYY I I I I I I _ a • . .. ,• qBlvdilr* '•• •�••' .o mpfl y e Cities & tern RR..•'4•• .• Lake mph LEGEND Stop Sign i0 V♦-. Signalized intersection Through Traffic Lane 10= Bypass Lane r Turning Traffic. lane (Right or Lel Umc) Low Volume Oriveway Channeliized Right Tum Lane mph a o E n o SM BR A U N Existing Lanes & Traffic Control Environmental Assessment Worksheet N T E RT E C NOW ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN N :s & Traffic Control TDI, October, 2006 IJOB NO: I BL-06-04539 1 DRAW BYN I JMJ 17 > •• m o , a M •• l4 .•• Lyman •' c 900 _ n , a 0 O Twin Cities& ,.••• Western RR ,•• Lake Hazeltine D Lyman Blvd 2 100 2 100' 7 500 'a c 0 0 N N Ic LEGEND ■ Average Annual Daily Traffic Volumes Projected N sm 2010 Daily Traffic Volume Due to Development B R A U N 2010 Daily Traffic Volume Due to Development Prepared by TDI, October, 2006 Environmental Assessment Worksheet DATE 10120/2006 N T E RT E C New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen JOB No BL-067539 Chanhassen, MN FIGURE NO: DRAWN JMJ 18 Br. Twin cities & Westem RR, . •' Lake e11seoam-* ••• ' O LSO •' m T • 1 r. 0 Q Blvd om roo E J �0 0 4rj Q ao� 4 j 4 A�670 r0 roo 4 �A60 w0 o} *� r 660.1 ti T r60 JO y o M " 130 ..�► o 0 110 �.► o 0 0 � 0 at 10 ..1 01 LEGEND OChanges in A. M. Peak Hour Turning Movement Counts Pue to Development i N SM B R A U N N T E RT E C 2010 AM Traffic Volume Due to Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet New ISD 112 High School in Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN 2010 AM Traffic Volume Due to Development Prepared try TDI, October, 2006 DATE: 10/20/2006 JOB NO BL-06-04539 FIGURE NO: DRAWN BY JMJ 19 Not ----------- 35 3r IJOB NO 7- I I I U 1 I I I I I I I 11 Ll Zoning C 0 Ru 0 Ru 0 Ru o.0 oLo o Lo Me Mk 0 Mk o %: 0 Re W G R Pi o In 0 Re 0 PI. PI_....�...._....,�.............._.,_ ...,. Public Open Space - PI Public Facilities - P2 Flood Way - F �J Open Development - O 5M B RAU N I NTE RTEC City of Chaska Zoning Map Environmental Assessment Worksheet New ISO 112 High School in Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN JOB No: I BL-06-04539 DPAVIN I JMJ I 22 N ISD 112 New High School Chanhassen, MN SUMMIT C O N S U L T I N G April 3, 2007 CODES, FIRE, LIFE SAFETY Table of Contents TOPIC ■ Executive Summary ■ Project Stakeholders ■ Building Information ■ Code Information ■ Main Gymnasium 1 _i Heights ■ Lower Level ■ Scope of Alternate Design ■ Intent of Alternate Design ■ MN BCSD Division Philosophy ■ Issues to Consider ■ Enhanced Sprinkler System - Design Features ■ Heat Release Rates ■ Alternate Design ■ Inspection, Testing, 8v Maintenance ■ Approvals ■ Remaining Documentation SLIDES 3 4 5 6 7 8-10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17-19 20-22 23 24 25 April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 2 n Executive Summary ■ Chanhassen High School i New building located in Chanhassen, MN ■ Analysis/scope Proposed alternate design to structural fire protection in and around the Main Gymnasium ■ Alternate designs allowed by Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) 11 2003: Subpart 13 of Section 1300.0110 ■ The basis of the alternate design provides enhanced sprinkler protection in lieu of passive fire protection of select structural components April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 3 Project Stakeholders ■ Authority Having Jurisdiction City of Chanhassen ■ Owner: ISD 112 ■ Architect: Rozeboom Miller Architects ■ Code Consultant: Summit Fire Consulting April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 4 Building Information ■ Chanhassen High School i_i Three stories in height i Overall building footprint: approximately 200,000 ft2 r i Overall building area: approximately 385,000 ft2 ■ Noncombustible, fire -rated construction i Type I-B ■ 1-hr rated roof assembly required ■ Applicable occupancies Group E (Education) - Primary i _i Group A (Assembly) ■ Group A-1, Group A-2, and Group A-3 i i Group F-1 (Moderate -Hazard Industrial) i i Group S (Storage) j It is assumed that NO portion of the building is classified as Group H (Hazardous) ■ Building constructed as non -separated uses due to unlimited allowable area for Type I-B construction April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 5 Code Information ■ 2003 MSBC Ll Includes 2000 International Building Code (IBC) with Minnesota amendments ■ Applicable exception... Footnote c.I of MSBC Table 601 height requirement of 20 ft ■ If all of the structural elements are located a minimum of 20 ft from the finished floor, then structural fire protection is not required ■ See later slides ■ Entire building will be fully sprinklered April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 6 Main Gymnasium ■ This Design Brief pertains solely to the alternate design for structural fire protection proposed for the Main Gymnasium i j All other areas of the building assumed compliant with the prescriptive requirements of the MSBC ■ Main Gymnasium included in northwest portion of building i_i Footprint: approximately 25,000 ft2 1:1 Two stories in height ■ Lower Level: Gymnasium floor, Bleachers ■ Relatively smaller First Floor: Running Track, Viewing Area i Area of First Floor: approximately 6,250 ft2 ■ Includes three basketball courts and "rollaway," stackable bleachers -i Bleachers extend over two practice basketball courts, located at east and west end of the Main Gymnasium, during competition events April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 7 ■ Main Gymnasium -Heights ■ Lower Level (i.e. Gymnasium floor and Bleachers) I Floor -to -truss height over the Gymnasium floor is approximately 35.5 ft to bottom of truss f i Floor -to -deck height over the Gymnasium floor ranges from approximately 40.5 ft to 42.0 ft to underside of roof deck ■ First Floor (i.e. Running Track and Viewing Area) I i Floor -to -truss height at the Running Track is approximately 15.5 ft to the bottom of the truss i Floor -to -deck height at the Running Track ranges from approximately 20.5 ft to 21.0 ft to underside of roof deck ■ See Figures on next slides ■ The First Floor and portions of the Bleachers do NOT meet the requirements of footnote c.1 of MSBC Table 601 1 Therefore, structural fire protection of the roof assembly is required for the entire roof assembly of the Main Gymnasium April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 8 Main Gymnasium -Heights Gymnasium Floor *Not to scale H1 = 40.5 ft to 42.0 ft H2 = 35.5 ft H3 = 26.5 ft (worst case) H4=20.0ft H5 = 20.5 ft to 2 1.0 ft H6 = 15.5 ft ft Running Track/Viewing Area April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 9 Height Requirements ■ Though the First Bleachers do not requirement, can met? Floor and a portion of the meet the 20 ft height the intent of the code still be ■ "...the relaxation of the requirements is based on the fact that where the roof is at least 20 ft above the nearest floor, the temperatures at this elevation during most fires are quite low. As a result, fire protection of the roof and its members, including the structural frame, may be omitted." 1-1 2000 IBC Handbook - Fire- and Life -Safety Provisions ■ How can temperatures be kept sufficiently low at heights less than 20 ft? ❑ ALTERNATE DESIGN!!! ❑ Enhanced sprinkler system ❑ Model design fires to show that the temperature of the steel truss members will stay sufficiently low April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 10 H, ,e Lower Level - Below Running Track/ Viewing Area ■ Enclosed rooms located below east and west portion of the Running Track/ Viewing Area ❑ Pre -cast concrete slabs bear on CMU block wall and pre -cast gymnasium walls ■ Includes limited exposed structural steel in select areas ■ Area below the south portion of the Running Track/ Viewing Area _1 Structural steel beams are supported from the roof deck of the Main Gymnasium by exposed steel hangers ❑ Pre -cast concrete slabs bear on structural steel beams and pre -cast gymnasium walls ■ Includes unprotected structural steel in select areas April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 11 h. Scope of Proposed Alternate Design ■ Construction is Type I-B ■ For Type I-B requirements to be met, the only applicable structural components to the proposed alternate design are the roof assembly over the Main Gymnasium and select areas below the Running Track/Viewing Area Steel bar joists, steel deck, steel hangers, steel beams, etc. ■ Perspective of allowable fire rating requirements Intent of footnote c.1 of Table 601 April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 12 ■ Intent of the Alternate Design ■ MSBC intends to protect against... i i Loss of life ■ According to statistics provided by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), there has never been a multiple -death fire in a fully sprinkled building that was properly designed, inspected, tested, and maintained Damage to property ■ Aside from sprinkler protection (or other provided active systems), there is inherent protection for the building in its components r Noncombustible construction in the Chanhassen High School, building construction does not add the fuel load in the building ■ WHY is the alternate design being proposed? ! i Feasibility and practicality j Aesthetics ■ Exposed roof structure desired in Main Gymnasium Cost ■ Additional concrete (for height) . Lighting ■ Tempering of additional "unused" volume ■ Encasing of steel trusses with gypsum, etc. April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 13 ■ u> ■ MN BCSD Division Philosophy Regarding Substituting Sprinklers for Passive Fire Protection - Keys ■ What substitution is being requested? ❑ Enhanced sprinkler protection in lieu of traditional passive structural fire protection at roof assembly above the Main Gymnasium and select areas/rooms below the Running Track/Viewing Area ■ What fuel load exists in the spaces being considered? 7 Primarily seating ■ Due to the use of the spaces (i.e. spectator seating, exercise/competition areas, circulation space, etc.), it is not practical for large amounts of combustibles to be located there r Storage rooms provided in some areas below the Running Track/ Viewing Area ■ How can the reliability of the sprinkler system approximate that of passive protection? Various strategies, discussed later in this Design Brief and future documentation April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 14 Issues to Consider ■ MN BCSD Division Philosophy Regardin Substituting Sprinklers for Passive Fire Protection u Water supply ❑ Security Maintenance -� Protection from freezing ■ Sprinkler reliability ❑ Water service to the facility ❑ Inspection, Testing, 8v Maintenance (ITM) ❑ Fire pump - if applicable ❑ Building maintenance April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 15 � M M M M M M Enhanced Sprinkler System ■ By utilizing an enhanced sprinkler system at the applicable areas, steel structural components can be better protected PROPOSED DESIGN ■ Provide reduced -spaced sprinklers above all applicable areas Seating area Running Track Viewing Area Gymnasium Floor Rooms/areas below Running Track/Viewing Area ■ Provide Quick Response (QR) sprinklers throughout the entire facility ■ Both of these design features reduce the time to sprinkler activation, and thus the heat release rate of the design fire at the time of sprinkler activation i i Ensures quicker control of fires in these areas, thus significantly reducing the temperatures reached at the structural steel above — see Graph on next slide ■ In addition, sprinklers providing protection of structural steel components will be strategically located to ensure full wetting of structural steel components ■ Equivalence of 1 hr can be met with an enhanced sprinkler system April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 16 Conceptual Heat Release Rates First Floor (H = 21.0 ft to underside of roof deck) 4,000 3,500 3,000 Y p 2,500 2,000 1 1,500 M 1 I, April 3, 2007 Standard Design 1 —Standard Design 2 —Alternate Desim 5 10 15 20 25 30 Timelmin) Chanhassen High School 17 ■ Conceptual Heat Release Rates Lower Level (H = 42.0 ft to underside of roof deck) 6,500 6,000 5,500 5,000 4,500 Y 4,000 3,500 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 0 April 3, 2007 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (min) Chanhassen High School 18 ■ S, Conceptual Heat Release Rates At H=20 ft to bottom of trusses (H = 26.5 ft to underside of roof deck) 4,000 , — _ i 3,500 3,000 w 2,500 a� 2,000 1,500 Iq 1,000 500 0 0 April 3, 2007 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (min) Chanhassen High School 19 Sprinkler Design - Alternate ■ THIS INFORMATION IS CONCEPTUAL ONLY - final design criteria TBD ■ Zoning of sprinklers r i Reduced zoning requirements ■ Future maintenance flexibility i The sprinkler system at the Main Gymnasium Roof Assembly and in the applicable rooms/areas below the Running Track/Viewing Area shall have their own dedicated sprinkler zone ■ Sprinkler type Quick response sprinklers; 155 °F activation Spacing and sprinkler locations ■ Meet Ordinary Hazard Group 2 classification over the Main Gymnasium throughout the entire roof assembly, and in the applicable rooms/areas below the Running Track/Viewing Area ■ Sprinkler spacing reduced to 100 ft2/head above the Main Gymnasium (see Figure on next slide) ■ Sprinklers provided approximately 8 ft o.c. along structural steel components (i.e. beams, angle bracing, etc.) located in rooms/areas below the Running Track/Viewing Area ■ Extended Coverage (EC) sprinklers are not permitted in the Main Gymnasium Meet MSBC requirements for gymnasiums ■ Hydraulics i_ i Design density, design area, hose stream, end head pressure (EHP), pressure cushion between supply and demand, balancing of systems to flow simultaneously, etc. April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 20 ■ Alternate Design Fire Sprinkler System - Lower Level Enclosed Rooms/Areas Below Running Track/Viewing Area: Use Quick Response sprinklers spaced 8 ft o.c. along structural steel components Alternate Design sprinkler zone (includes Lower Level and First i _ 1 Floor) April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School *For conceptual purposes only 21 Inspecting, Testing, 8, Maintenance ■ Increase overall reliability of structural fire protection sprinkler system FJ Statistics show that a major portion of sprinkler failures are attributed to improper ITM ■ Documented ITM procedures ■ Record of ITM procedure ❑ Maintained on -site April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 23 Approvals ■ City of Chanhassen Ij Review of alternate design submittal: Design Report from Summit Fire Consulting ❑ Review of sprinkler plan submittal: sprinkler shop drawings and hydraulic calculations [from sprinkler contractor] ❑ Field inspections ■ Field inspections Fi Per City of Chanhassen requirements April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 24 ■ G, Remaining Documentation ■ Final Report from Summit Fire Consulting o Embellish information in this Design Brief Includes documented agreement with Chanhassen High School ■ Any others? April 3, 2007 Chanhassen High School 25 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax:952.2271110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Waring 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us LS-7-oSe August 15, 2013 Ms. DeDee Kahring Director of Finance and Operations ISD No. 112 11 Peavey Road Chaska, MN 55318 Re: Chanhassen High School Site Plan Permit No. 2007-06 Refund of Cash Escrow Dear Ms. Kahring: Enclosed is a check in the amount of $5,000 which represents a refund of the security escrow paid to the city as part of the referenced site plan permit (copy attached). The site was recently inspected and determined to be in compliance with the boulevard restoration, erosion control and landscaping requirements. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 952- 227-1131 or by email at b¢enerousCcf�,ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincere1 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner RG:ktm ec: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Coordinator g:lplan12007 planning cases`07-06 chaohassen high schooruscmw refund letter 08-15-2013.dm SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Document No. OFFICE OF THE T 163182 REGISTRAR OF TITLES IIIIIIII IIIIIIII III CARVER CSOTA h##17406 3 COUNTY, Mee $E e 46.00 Certfed Recorded on 06.06-2007 at 02:00 ❑ AM qPM 2007-06-06 11111111111111111111111111111111111 Reg strar of Titles r Document No. OFFICE OF THE A 465613 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Fee: $ 46.00 Check#: 17405 Certfed Recorded on 06-06-2007 at 02:00 ❑ AMPM 465613 111111111111111111111 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT #07-06 SPECIAL PROVISIONS Carl W. FansLn, Jr. County Recorder AGREEMENT dated March 26, 2007, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and Independent School Districthe No. 112, XRlQQd0p06tX a Minnesota public school corporation (the 'Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A --Site Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan B--Grading & Drainage Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan C--Landscaping Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan D--Utility Plans prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan E--Electric Plan prepared by Hallberg Engineering, PC, dated 02-01-07. Plan F--Architectural Plan prepared by Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc., dated 02-02-07. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by August 1, 2009. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $5,000.00 (boulevard restoration, erosion control and landscaping). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said landscaping. PROCEDURESFOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Steven Pumper Independent School District 112 11 Peavey Road Chaska, MN 55318 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. City Council approves the Site Plan with Variance for a three- story building and up lighting for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots, subject to the following conditions: a. The developer shall add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas, plazas and scenic overlooks. Bicycle parking pads and storage racks shall be provided on site. b. The developer shall include angled visitor parking in the drop-off access west of the building entrance. c. The building fagade flood lights shall be permitted contingent upon meeting the intent of the lighting ordinance and subject to city review and approval. d. Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalks or trails connect. e. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by opening day of the school: • Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection. • Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for the addition of a north leg to the intersection. • Construct the following turn lanes: Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane .Approach Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North Bypass lane School Access Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North 200 feet School Access Westbound North School Access at Through lane becomes 300 feet Lyman Boulevard turn lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 100 feet Boulevard -Lyman Westbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 300 feet Build through/right Lyman Boulevard Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon 200 feet Road South Westbound Lyman Boulevard at 200 feet Audubon Road South Northbound Audubon Road South at Build to add through Lyman Boulevard lane Southbound Audubon Road South at 200 feet Build through/right Lyman Boulevard • In addition the School District shall participate in the cost of the upgrading of Lyman Boulevard on a fair and equitable basis. f. Building Official Conditions: 1) The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 2) The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3) Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls). 4) Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. g. Fire Marshal Conditions: 1) A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 2) Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 3) Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 4) Yellow curbing and "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of signs to be installed. 5) No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6) Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.4. h. Forester Conditions: 1) Increase plantings for parking lot area in order to meet ordinance requirement of 156 trees. 2) Replace Black Hills spruce seedlings with white spruce. 3) Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected. Fencing shall be installed around trees prior to grading. 4) Understory seedlings shall be located among overstory deciduous trees. 5) The applicant shall increase the quantity of seedlings planted in each grouping. 6) All deciduous seedlings shall be protected by tree tubes. Tubes shall be monitored and removed at the appropriate time. All tubes shall be fitted with protective bird netting. 7) All ash trees shall be replaced by an alternative species. 4 8) The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yard plantings along the east property line. Native shrubs and vines shall be incorporated into the landscape in addition to trees. 9) The columnar Norway maple shall be replaced with a different columnar tree such as Armstrong red maple, Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species. i. Engineer Conditions: 1) The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses to Lyman Boulevard. 2) ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska to construct the access through the substation property. 3) Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland/wetland mitigation and Lyman Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100-year event. 4) Additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future width of Lyman Boulevard will be treated in the ponds. 5) Hydrology to the wetland/wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point must be maintained. 6) The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting. 7) The development team should reexamine the proposed grades within the infield of softball field 1 to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher's mound. 8) Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner. 9) Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must be approved by the appropriate private utilities. 10) Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan. 11)The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer. 12) Pond, drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands. 13)The developer must adjust the sanitary sewer manhole elevations according to City standard detail plates. 14) The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine if the high school construction has damaged the pipe. If the City televises this sanitary sewer before the high school construction mobilized, the developer will only be required to televise the line after construction is complete. 15)The school district will be reimbursed $166,424.00 which is the cost difference between the 18-inch trunk and 10-inch lateral watermain. 16) Trunk water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued. 17) The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds. 18) Based on the proposed utility plan, an irrigation meter is required. 19) The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer, existing overhead utilities and existing gas pipelines. 20) Mylar and digital as-builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver County coordinates. j. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions: 1) Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner compliant with the project's Wetland Alteration Permit, Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). 2) The project shall comply with the conditions of its Conditional Use Permit for Development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 3) The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including all information required by the NPDES Construction Site Permit shall be located at the job trailer. 4) Stable emergency overflows shall be provided for the proposed ponds on site. The emergency overflows shall be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed. The emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re -enforcement mat or fabric and riprap. 5) The plan shall include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site. The timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow area. The rate of mulch application shall also be included on the plans (2 tons per acre, disc anchored). 6) All riprap/fabric at the flared end section shall be installed within 24 hours of flared end section installation. 7) Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8) Silt fence that is not placed on the contour shall have J-Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet. 9) Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas. The areas of temporary sediment basins shall be labeled on the plan. A temporary and/or permanent sediment pond shall be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared End Sections (FES) 7 and 8. This shall be installed prior to grading and then used as a temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland. If it is used as a temporary pond, it should stay in place until all turf is established. Temporary outlet structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) shall be provided for the ponds; details should be provided. 10) Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering methods from the City's project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior to conducting any and all dewatering on -site. 11) Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets. 12) The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A). 13) The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area. 14) Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 15) The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (i.e., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. k. The applicant and city staff shall look at reasonable alternative designs to reduce the impact of the retaining walls. 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit 'B" and incorporated herein. BY: J am' IN `� T as A. urlong, or AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager DEVELOPER: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO BY: Steven Pumper Its Director of Finance and Operations STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thiso�day of 2001, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporat, n and urs/ua to the authority granted by its City Council. ^(7 ( X V , t , STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF%acyre r KAREN J. ENGELHARDT Notary Public -Minnesota The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this-//tday of _QP.ei` 20ojby Steven Pumper, the Director of Finance and Operations of Independent School District No. 112, a Minneso lic school corporation, as the Developer. SANDRAJ.NEiAL NOTARY P LIC Nahry tic DRAFCED BY: Mr evriMm E¢wir rf]1.I010 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227.1100 That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast corner thereof; thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest corner thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other casements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of 0 record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest corner of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. 10 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developers expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be wan -anted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims 11 made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomeys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on -site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall 12 not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 am. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws. Ordinances. and Regulations., In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall fumish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. 13 Status Report Thursday, August 01, 2013 PIan.OR6 ® Securities Is"d Due S P Category Description 8/1/2013 8/1/2013 ® Escrows ® Cash Escrow Chanhassen High School Site Plan Agreement 07-06 Planning Case 2007-06 $5,000 Boulevard Restoration Erosion Control landscaping ISD 112 Paid $5,000 Check No. 5709 Notify Bob Generous 7/30/09-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 7/31/09 - Jill inspected site on 7/30/09. Site is incomplete. Continue to hold escrow. Check status 9/l/09. Kim 9/2/09 - Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 9/8/09 - Per Bob retain escrow. Check status 6/15/10. Kim 6/18/10 - Notified Bob/Jill. Kim I1/18110-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 11/18/10 - Per Jill The trees have not been replaced. Trees to be replaced: ginkgos in east courtyard area, maples along entry drive to the west, and 2 others near fields. Check status 6/15/11. Kim 7/8/I1 -Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 8/3/11 - Per Jill there are dead trees that need to he replaced. Check status 1 I/l/I1. Kim 11/I/ll-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 11/2/11 - Per Jill hold escrow. Check status 6/12/12. They are working on completing the landscaping. Kim 6/12/12-Notified Jill. Kim 8/1/12 - Notified Jill. Kim 8/15/12 - Per Jill, landscaping complete but Krista would like to continue to hold escrow for min garden and wetland work that remains to be completed. Notifiy Jill in May, 2013. Kim 5/6/13 - Notified Jill. Kim Per Jill, Krista is working with the high school to resolve min garden and wetland issues. Check status 8/1/13. Kim 8/1/13 -Notified Jill. Kim 8/8/13 - Per Jill ok to release. Notified Finance. Activity closed. Kim O W . oe ebPn„x cap. ...................................................................... ...................................................................... ...................................................................... aR( UA1120A S=Status P=Pmm Papa 1 Thursday,• 01, 2013•' JvI 2000 Au ust 2900 Se te4er 2000 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S M T W T F S 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 .2.. 3..4...5 ..6.. i ..8 .6 ..7..8. _9 ..10 11:12 .3 ..4 ..5. _6 ..7...E...9 9' 1611 12 i4 16 17 1418 i6'u 18 19 10 11 ff 1314 15'16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 13 2ir 28 17 18 19 2021 22 23 23 24 25.26 27 29 N 27.28 29 EO 37........ 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 36 3i...................... ............................. ............................. Securities Cat Start Due S P o Descd tion 8/1/2013 8/1/2013 C Escrows ® Cash Escrow Chanhassen High School Si ent 07-06 007-06 $5,000 Bail omtion Emsion Control Iand scaping ISD 112 Paid $5,000 Check No. 5709 Notify Bob Generous 7/30/09 - Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 7/31/09 - Jill inspected site on 7/30/09. Site is incomplete. Continue to bold escrow. Check status 9/l/09. Kim 92/09 -Notified Boh/Jill. Kim 9/8/09 - Per Bob retain escrow. Check status 6/15/10. Kim 6/18/10-Notfied Bob/Jill. Kim 11/18/10- Notified Boh/Jill. Kim 11/19/10 - Per Jill The trees have not been replaced. Trees to be replaced: ginkgos in east courtyard area, maples along entry drive to the west, and 2 others near fields. Check status 6/15/11. Kim 7/8/11 -Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 8/3/I1 - Per Jill there are dead trees that need to be replaced. Check status l l/l/l 1. Kim I1/1/1I -Notified Bob/JdL Kim 112/11 - Per Jill hold escrow. Check status 6/12/12. They are working on completing the landscaping. Kim 6/12/12 -Notified Jill. Kim 8/1/12 -Notified Jill. Kim 8/15/12 - Per Jill, landscaping complete but Krista would like to continue to hold escrow for min garden and wetland work that remains to be completed. Notifiy Jill in May, 2013- Kim 5/6/13 - Notified Jill. Kim Per Jill, Krista is working with the high school to resolve rain garden and wetland issues. Check status 8/1/13. Kim 8/1/13 -Notified Jill. Kim otaesc•••rcoe.r Cua dumlar ssr.w s=srr. r-wt.ay Pp1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 04/12/2007 11:32 AM Receipt No. 00039841 CLERK: betty PAYEE: Ind School Dist #112 ------------------------------------------------------- Security Escrow 5,000.00 Total Cash Check 5709 Change 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 Status Report Thursday, August 01, 2013 PIan.OR6 .an 20a0 R st tam temper 2mo M T W T F SW T F S $ %, TV i T F S 12 3 4 5 2 2 .. 3 4 _. 5 .6...__..6 .9 ..i091 i2.9 9 t0 ti 1213 i415 16 17 18 19 i0 '_ '4 -i-16 16 17 i8 i9 20 2122 3 2121 N 17 " '3 "+. 2- 23 28 24 2526 2- 28 29 0 Ji 24 -6 2"s 30 3i1Ji-.. _.. _____._ ................ .._... _.. Securities [Start Due SP Category Description N1I.J (ash lscrol. Chanhasscn High School Site Plan Agreement 07-06 Planning Case 2007-06 $5,000 Boulevard Restoration Erosion Control Landscaping ISD 112 Paid $5,000 Check No. 5709 Notify Bob Generous 7/30/09-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 7/31/09 -Jill inspected site on 7/30/09. Site is incomplete. Continue to hold escrow. Check status 9/1109. Kim 92/09 -Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 9/8/09 - Per Bob retain escrow. Check status 6/15/10. Kim 6/I8/10-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 11/I8/10-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 11/19/10 -Per Jill The trees have not been replaced. Trees to be replaced: ginkgos in east courtyard area, maples along entry drive to the west, and 2 others new fields. Check status 611511 L Kim 718/11 -Notified Bob/Jill _ Kim 8/3/11 - Per Jill thereare dead trees that need to be replaced. Check status 11/1/1 I. Kim I I/l/11 -Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 1112JI I - Per Jill hold escrow. Check status 6/12/12. They are working on completing the landscaping. Kim 6/12/12-Notified Jill. Kim 8/1/12-Notified Jill. Kim 8/15/12 - Per Jill, landscaping complete but Krism would like to continue to hold escrow for rain garden and wetland work that remains to be completed. Nknifty Jill in May, 2013. Kim 5/6/13-Notified Jill_ Kim Per Jill, Krista is working with the high school to resolve rain garden and wetland issues. Check status 8/1/13. Kim ------------------- .................................._...................................._._......... _................. .................. Status Report Wednesday, May 01, 2013 PIan.OR6 F311 2000 st 200a T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 1 2 5.. 5 _.,_.A.5... .. 8...9 ..1011 a2 3..4.5...5_... 92.,13 14 15 13. 14 15'1a 17 18 75 tU-11. 12 13 14 1519 20 Z' 22 26 21 22 23 24 25'�18 19 26 21 22' 2 29 24 27 M 2e 30 31 ....2526yt­;ff29 .___. _..... ..................... n Securities IStart Due S P Category Description "3 5/1/2013 5/1/2013 F Escrows ig Cash Escrow Chanhassen High School Site Plan Agreement 07-06 Planning Case 2007-06 $5,000 Boulevard Restoration Erosion Control Landscaping ISD 112 Paid $5,000 Check No. 5709 Notify Bob Generous 7/30/09-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 7/31/09 - Jill inspected site on 7/30/09. Site is incomplete. Continue to hold escrow. Check status 911/09. Kim 9/2/09-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 9/8/09 -Per Bob retain escrow. Check status 6/15/10. Kim 6/18/10-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 11/I8/10-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim I 1 /18110 -Per Jill The trees have not been replaced. Trees to be replaced: ginkgos in east courtyard area, maples along entry drive to the west, and 2 others near fields. Check status 6/15/1 I. Kim 7/8/11 -Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 8/3/1 I - Per Jill there are dead trees that need to be replaced. Check status 11/l/11. Kim I I/l/11 -Notifed Bob/Jill. Kim 1112/11 -Per Jill hold escrow. Check status 6/12/12. They are working on completing the landscaping. Kim 6/12112-Notified Jill- Kim 8/1/12-Notified Jill. Kim 8/15/12 - Per Jill, landscaping complete but Krista would like to continue to hold escrow for rain garden and wetland work that remains to be completed. Notifiy Jill in May, 2013. Kim ........................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................... o yam oevsapmem cap WIM 12AZOPM sStalm %Pligily P4 1 J Status Report Tuesday, June 12, 2012 Plan.OR6 July 2000 M89 200� a ember 2000 T F S S M T VJ T F S 3 4 5 2 2 3 a_.5.. _. _T...B ill it t2 3_.4--5 5 ]__8 99 .0 11 12 - i<-t$ 1'/ t9 19 to 'i -i2 13--1a 15 i616 18 19 2 21 22 ] 24 25 % 1' ' _.. a 2.-, 2323 24 25 26 b 22 29 0 71 24 :e. ]5 _a 22_W 3i....... .... ._....... _. J Securities (Start Due S P - Category Description 6/12/2012 6/12/2012 0 Escrows i7 Cash Escrow Chanhassen High School Site Plan Agreement 07-06 Planning Case 2007-06 $5,000 Boulevard Restoration Erosion Control Landscaping ISD 112 Paid $5,000 Check No. 5709 Notify Bob Generous 7130/09-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 7/31109 -Jill inspected site on 7/30/09. Site is incomplete. Continue to hold escrow. Check status 9/I/09. Kim 92/09-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 9/8/09 - Per Bob retain escrow. Check status 6115/10. Kim 6119/10-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 11/I8/10-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 11119/10 - Per Jill The trees have not been replaced. Trees to be replaced: ginkgos in east courtyard area, maples along entry drive to the west, and 2 others near fields. Check status 6/15/I 1. Kim 7/8/11 -Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 813/11 - Per Jill there aredead trees that need lobe replaced. Check status I I/l / 11. Kim 11/1/I I-Notifed Bob/Jill. Kim 112/11 - Per Jill hold escrow. Check status 6/12/12. Thev are working on completing the landscaping. Kim 6/12/12-Notified Jill. Kim 8/1/12-Notified Jill. Kim ............................................................................................................... ............................. ......... I ................... ............................. ............................. or o�Cm WIM1298.51N 99d1u5 P-Pi pe8t 1 Status Report Tuesday, June 12, 2012 Plan.OR6 Jul 2000 usr to ber2000 S M T VJ T F S OfA W T F S s M T W T F S 12 3 9.;$ 1 2 2.. 3..4---5.6.._7_.8 .9 1011 r.4._ 5...6 .. y.. F _99 10 11 12 131415 d 'ii"i9 1i�1113 i4 iE-1616 1] 18 19 20 21 22 J'2425. 1A'19 2b 21 2233n 24 25 26 27 23 29 i0 31 ` ' 25 28 27 'W29.'30 31...................... .......__.;..: ..................... Securities Istim Due s P Category Description 6/12/2012 6/122012 F Escrows W Cash Escrow Chanhassen High School Site Plan Agreement 07-06 Planning Case 2007-06 $5,000 Boulevard Restoration Erosion Control Landscaping ISD 112 Paid $5,000 Check No. 5709 Notify Bob Generous 7/30/09 -Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 7/31/09 - Jill inspected site on 7130/09. Site is incomplete. Continue to hold escrow. Check status 9/l/09. Kim 9/2/09-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 9/8/09 - Per Bob retain escrow. Check status 6115/10. Kim 6/18/10-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 11/18/10-Notified Bob/Jill. Kim I 1 /18/10 - Per Jill The trees have not been replaced. Trees to be replaced: ginkgos in east courtyard area, maples along entry drive to the west, and 2 others near fields. Check status 6/15/11. Kim 7/8/11 -Notified Bob/Jill. Kim 8/3/11 - Per Jill thereare dead trees that need to be replaced. Check status I VIA L Kim I I/l/11 -Notifed Bob/Jill. Kim 11/2/11 - Per Jill hold escrow. Check status 6/12/12- They are working on completing the landscaping. Kim Item Non -Scannable Item G Folder Number yFChanhllySymmuen M�ggfi Smcahool-Filetoil�__,�` Folder Name Job Number% Box Number ()U � 5 4 4;�5v P(�41rltv cot socol oroot CITY OF CHMIMSEN T700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone. 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952 227 1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax 952.2271110 Park & Recreation Phone. 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227,1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.221.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone:952227.1125 Fax: 952 227.1110 Web She wwwci.chanhassen. mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: March 26, 2007 SUBJ: Chanhassen High School Planning Case #07-06 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The new Chanhassen High School will be constructed for 2000 students, grades 9-12. The total area of the building is approximately 406,000 square feet. The approval includes a rezoning, a conditional use permit with a variance, site plan approval with variances and a wetland alteration permit. ACTION REQUIRED City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 6, 2007 to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted five for and none against a motion recommending approval of the Chanhassen High School. The Planning Commission minutes for March 6, 2006 are item la of the March 26, 2007 City Council packet. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the four motions as specified on pages 23 - 30 in the staff report dated March 6, 2007 approving the new high school. ATTACHMENTS Rezoning Ordinance. 2. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 6, 2007. gA lanL007 planning casesx07-06 chanhassen high schwRexecutive sum ry.doc The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a champing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA [ R90IJylejQMCI AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning the Chanhassen High School Site, see exhibit A for legal description, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office and Institutional District, OI. Section 2. The rezoning of this property is subject to all conditions of City Council approval. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 26'h day of March, 2007. ATTEST: Todd Gerhard, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Published in the Chanhassen Villager on PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Per Warranty Deed Document No. 148445) That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast comer thereof, thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest corner thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest corner thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00feet along said east line to the point of beginning. Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest comer of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. a r/ r Z F A W E0 H rA CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DATE: March 6, 2007 CC DATE: March 26, 2007 REVIEW DEADLINE: April 3, 2007 CASE #: 07-06 BY: AF, RG, LH, ML, JM, JS PROPOSAL: • Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office and Institutional District, OI; • Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storagetmaintenance buildings and parking lots; • Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District; and • Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on site LOCATION: North of Lyman Boulevard, south of the Twin Cities and Western Railroad, and west of Bluff Creek APPLICANT: Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. Independent School District 112 7575 Golden Valley Road, Suite 200 11 Peavey Road Minneapolis, MN 55427 Chaska, MN 55318 763-544-7129 952-556-6261 PRESENT ZONING: A2, Agricultural Estate District, and PUD, Planned Unit Development 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Office Institutional and Office/Industrial ACREAGE: 95 DENSITY: F. A. R. 0.1 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is proposing a High School Campus. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Location Map Chanhassen High School Planning Case No. 07-06 City of Chanhassen Or-AHMED Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 2 The City's discretion in approving or denying a wetland alteration permit is limited to whether or not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the wetland alteration permit. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners in excess of 500 feet. PROPOSAUSUMMARY The new Chanhassen High School will be constructed for 2000 students, grades 9-12. The total area of the building is approximately 406,000 square feet which is slightly smaller than the recently expanded Chaska High School (415,000 square feet). When completed, Independent School District 112 will have two high schools with a total district high school capacity of 4000 students. The building is designed with three distinct functional components — Academic, Performing Arts, and Physical Education/Athletic — around a central commons space that contains the primary public entrance, student dining, student support services, and building administration. A neighborhood meeting was held on January 18, 2007 at the Chanhassen Recreation Center. Approximately 20 residents attended the meeting. An overview of the proposed High School was presented including a history of how we got to this point, a summary of the public hearing process and a presentation of the site and building plans. Brick and pre -cast with a stone colored veneer concrete are the predominate building materials. Issues that were raised: How does the development blend into the wetland to the east? The proposed building site will be approximately 50 feet above the wetland. The slopes are proposed to be seeded with a prairie grass mix similar to what was used in the City's wetland restoration project in the Bluff Creek Corridor. Where will retaining walls be located, how will they look and how large will they be? A suggestion was made that something architectural is expected by neighbors. Staff directed the developer to increase the plantings east of the retaining walls to help soften them. A question was raised about how they could be assured that what was proposed, both financially and visually, would be ultimately built. They were several comments about students parking in adjacent neighborhoods, Bluff Creek Estates, Stone Creek and Creekside, and then accessing the High School site. This issue will have to be monitored to determine if it becomes a problem. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 3 There was concern that the erosion control fencing will not be removed when the project is complete. The contractor will have the erosion control fencing removal included as part of their contract. Questions were raised about bus noise. It was pointed out that 1) there is little noise; and 2) bus operations are during a limited time during the day for 15 — 30 minutes in the morning and afternoon. Questions about the football stadium operations and lighting. It was pointed out that the stadium would be in a bowl, rather than above grade level. Use of lighting will on a limited basis. Questions were raised about improvements to the street network, particularly Lyman Boulevard, but also complaints about existing improvements to Audubon Road north of Lyman Boulevard The Cities of Chanhassen and Chaska and Carver County, in consultation with the School District, are discussing roadway improvements. However, these specific roads are beyond the scope of the school project itself. The site is located south of the Twin Cities and Western Railroad and the Stone Creek neighborhood (residential single-family), west of Bluff Creek and the Bluff Creek Estates neighborhood (residential single-family) as well as the Sun Ridge neighborhood (residential large lot single-family), and north and east of Lyman Boulevard. Chaska's electrical substation lies between the school's south property line and the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road. To the northeast is the Chanhassen Business Center, an office/industrial park. West of Lyman Boulevard is a Chaska industrial park. The majority of the property was farmed for agricultural purposes with the highest point of the site and the steep grades along its east boundary area made up of native grasses and trees. A fairly significant wooded area lies along the south edge of the property. The old farm homestead, with some remnants still remaining, lies in the southwest corner of the site just opposite Hazeltine Lake Drive. Existing wetlands predominantly lie along the east edge of the property with localized fingers extending at the north and south edges of the property toward the west. Approximately 25 acres of wetland areas exist within the property limits. The topography of the property varies in elevation from 985 at the lowest point (east) to 1075 at the top of the grassy height in the center of the site. Because the center of the site is at the highest elevation, drainage typically is directed toward the extents of the property eventually reaching either the Bluff Creek wetlands to the east or to the Lyman Boulevard ditch to the west and south. Drainage immediately south of the high point of the site will be carried to Bluff Creek via a fairly significant natural gorge immediately north of the electrical substation. Water is available at the northwest the northeast comers of the site. A 12-inch water main extends approximately 200 feet south of the northeast property comer where it terminates. Water off the northwest comer of the property actually lies north of the railroad tracks and at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Galpin Boulevard. Sanitary (trunk) sewer is located along the length of the east property line and connects the neighborhood to the north to a point extending south of the Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road intersection. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 4 The new high school campus includes parking for approximately 1,000 cars, bus parking for approximately 30 buses, and overflow and event parking for an additional 140 vehicles. Three entrance drives off Lyman Boulevard provide access to the school site. The south entrance drive is at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road and will primarily support bus and event parking. The entrance drive at the southwest corner of the site at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Lake Hazeltine Drive will serve for limited ingress/egress. The entrance drive west of the school will serve as the main entrance for students, visitors and service deliveries. With the existence of the Magellan gas pipeline north of the school and north parking lot, the athletic facilities find themselves north of the pipeline easement. The exception to this is the proposed tennis courts and soccer fields which lie just south of the Magellan easement and are located northeast and northwest of the building, respectively. Softball and baseball facilities are located in the northwest quadrant of the site and are tucked between the gas main and railroad tracks. The running track and field stadium, which is aligned in a northwest -southeast direction, will be carved into the hillside to allow the home bleachers to transition from an upper spectator plaza down to the field level. Home bleachers for 1,600 spectators and visitor bleachers for 800 spectators are provided. Field events, including high jump, long/triple jump, pole vault, shot put, and discus are located along the east and southeast comers of the running track. Practice fields will be developed in the northeast quadrant of the site and tucked between the railroad tracks and existing wetland areas. The Office Institutional (OI) District limits building height to two stories. The proposed school is three stories by City definition. (If the height (II) of the basement is more than 12 feet at any point, or if the height (H) is more than six feet for more than 50 percent of the perimeter of the building, then it is considered a story.) The lowest level (basement) of the school building has a height of 20 feet. Therefore, a variance is required from the OI district regulations. Due to the significant elevation changes on the property, staff encouraged the school district to develop the site with a walkout -style building. This design maintains more of the site topography by using the building itself to accommodate elevation changes than would be possible with a typical, i.e., flattening of the site, design. However, it also leads to the need for a variance. Staff recommends the granting of the variance for a three-story building. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Section 20-1255 of the Chanhassen City Code requires a conditional use permit for all development within the Bluff Creek Corridor. The applicant has proposed the location of the southerly driveway access encroaching in the primary zone. The encroachment into the primary zone requires the approval of a variance. Due to the location of the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road, the location of this driveway is fixed and the encroachment in to the primary zone cannot be avoided. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provided information about the project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW was prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The most significant potential issues associated with the proposed project are: Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page S 1. Traffic: There will be temporary impacts to vehicle traffic due to construction -related activity during excavation, construction materials delivery and storage, and tie-ins to existing subgrade utilities. These predicted vehicle traffic impacts will last for much of the construction life of the project, and will be geographically associated with the phasing of construction. Some of the potential impacts can be mitigated through implementation of City ordinances relating to hours and days of operation, noise, nuisance conditions, etc. Post -construction traffic impacts are anticipated after the project is constructed, and are detailed in the traffic study. These impacts are anticipated to involve slight decreases in Level of Services (LOS) in the project vicinity. Plans for mitigation of these impacts include adding turn lanes and signalization of nearby intersections and are included as conditions of approval. No additional traffic impacts or issues have been identified that require further investigation. 2. Wetland Impacts: A total of 1.66 acres of wetlands are proposed to be filled as part of the project. Mitigation measures will include on -site replacement (new wetland creation, as well as public value credits) according to MN Wetland Conservation Act rules, which are administered by the City of Chanhassen. No additional wetland impacts or issues have been identified that require further investigation. 3. Storm Water Runoff: There is potential for impacts to Bluff Creek and associated wetlands from temporary and permanent storm water runoff. Potential impacts from temporary storm water runoff include those from sediment loading during and immediately after construction. These potential impacts will be mitigated through MPCA storm water and local permitting. Potential impacts from permanent storm water runoff include those from performance of storm water engineering design and construction. These potential impacts will be mitigated through local review of design plans, as well as on -site inspections during construction. No additional storm water impacts or issues have been identified that require further investigation. Based on this review of the potential environmental impacts, the mitigation measures incorporated in the site plan should address the impacts. The proposed development, generally, complies with the city requirements and staff is recommending approval of the project subject to the conditions of the staff report. APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article IV, Conditional Use Permits Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 6 Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article XXI, "Or' Office and Institutional District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office - Institutional Developments Chapter 20, Article XXXI, Bluff Creek Overlay District BACKGROUND On December 11, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved an Interim Use Permit to grade the site in preparation of development and a resolution of Negative Declaration of the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Chanhassen High School Campus. On March 4, 2004, the Chanhassen City Council approved a Land Use Amendment to pennit Office/Industrial and Office/Institutional uses on the site. REZONING The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 95 acres from A2, Agricultural Estate District and PUD, Planned Unit Development to Office and Institutional District, OI. The project consists of a High School campus. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan. SITE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE The project is a new High School campus for Independent School District 112 consisting of a three-story, 405,367 square -foot building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storagetmaintenance buildings and parking lots. The building is designed with three distinct functional components — Academic, Performing Arts, and Physical Education/Athletic — composed around a central commons space that contains the primary public entrance, student dining, student support services, and building administration. The high school building is divided into two sections separated by a main entrance corridor and commons area with classrooms located on the southern half of the building and performing arts facilities, auditoriums and gymnasiums located in the northern half of the building. The lowest floor area is 102,096 square feet. The main (first) floor area is 197,174 square feet. The second floor is 92,043 square feet. The building footprint is 235,907 square feet. The building exterior is highly articulated with multiple materials and vertical and horizontal architectural elements. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 7 Size portion Placement The main entry to the building is located in the middle of the structure. The lower level provides access for students from the bus drop-off to the east. The main entrance faces west, toward Lyman Boulevard, and will be visible from the north and central access drives, and provides access to students who drive or are dropped off as well as visitors to the school. Ground level of a multi story is visually distinct from the upper stories through the use of materials, windows and other architectural building elements. The public entrance to the building and central commons faces west. The student bus entrance is on the east side of the building, also with access to the central student commons, directly opposite the main public entrance. East Entrance View from the Southeast Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 8 Material and detail Building materials are high quality and consist of brick, architectural pre -cast panels and glass curtain walls and windows. The exterior building materials include two colors of brick and one color of pre -cast stone. The two brick colors are composed horizontally to emphasize the connection to the geology of the natural site and to emphasize the walk -out level on the east side. The lighter -colored cast stone is integrated as vertical planar accents at the significant architectural elements of the building: the entrance, the commons, the fly loft, the team resource areas, and the science wing. Color The brick colors are coppertone velour (burnt red) and mountain shadow velour (grayish red). The pre -cast concrete color is travertine texture (sand). The aluminum curtain wall is extra dark/dark bronze. The pre -finished metal panels are charcoal gray. Height and Roof Design Height is limited to two stories in the Office and Institutional District. However, due to the type and function of building as a school and the direction that the City provided to the school to reduce site grading, the construction of a walkout -type building is wan -anted. Normally, the lower basement level would not be included as a story. However, because the lower floor elevation is more than 12 feet, it is by definition a story. It is reasonable to grant the variance to permit a three-story building (see attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation for the variance). The proposed roof has significant and varied parapet and enclosure heights to create the vertical articulation as part of the roof design required by city code. Mechanical equipment shall be screened within enclosures. Facade transparency The westerly elevation is the only elevation directly viewable by the general public. This building elevation is highly articulated with 50 percent of the elevation that is viewed by the public incorporating transparent windows and or doors. Natural light is essential to the learning environment. Windows are organized in a hierarchy of groupings and sizes from the punched openings at each classroom, to the large storefront windows in the team resource areas, to the clerestory windows and curtain walls that will flood the common areas of the building with natural light and capture views of the natural wetland areas near the school. Site Furnishing Community features may include: landscaping, lighting, benches, tables and art. The school district should add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas, plazas and scenic overlooks. Bicycle parking storage racks should also be provided on site. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 9 At the top of retaining walls the developer is proposing the installation of 4-foot chain link fences. Surrounding stadiums and ball fields are proposed 8-foot fences. The baseball backstop is 18 feet tall. The softball backstop is 14 feet tall. The tennis court fence is 10 feet tall. Loading areas, refuse area, etc. Screening of service yards, refuse and waste removal, other unsightly areas and truck parking/loading areas is accomplished through the location of these areas on the north and south sides of the building. Enclosure walls are also provided around these areas to provide additional screening. Landscaping Minimum landscaping requirements include 39,176 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, 156 trees for the parking lot, and bufferyard plantings along property lines. Applicant's proposed landscaping as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Item Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 39,176 s . ft. 57,300 s . ft. Trees/ parking lot 156 overstory trees 134 overstory trees North property line 43 overstory trees Existing mature tree line Bufferyard B — 2190' 87 undertstory trees 40 tree seedlings 131 shrubs East property line 27 overstory trees 35 overstory trees bufferyard A — 2720' 54 understory trees 9 understory trees 81 shrubs 76 shrubs 30 tree seedlings South/West property line 40 overstory trees 43 overstory trees Bufferyard B — 2030' 80 understory trees 0 understory trees 120 shrubs 8 shrubs 4 tree seedlings Prairie planting The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for the parking lot plantings. The applicant also does not meet quantity specific categories of bufferyard plantings; however, the proposed plan does incorporate beneficial landscape elements such as native species and prairie plantings. Staff recommends that the applicant increase plantings in order to meet minimum ordinance requirements for parking lot plantings and the east buffer yard. The applicant is proposing seedling plantings and prairie/native grass plantings. Staff recommends that all deciduous seedlings be protected by tree shelter tubes. The tubes need to be installed when the seedlings are planted and monitored throughout the next 3-5 years to insure that the tubes are removed at the proper time. All of the seedlings are native species with the exception of Black Hills spruce. Staff recommends that this conifer be changed to a native white spruce. Also, the understory selections, ironwood and blue beech, are trees that grow naturally Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 10 in the shade of taller trees. Their placement in the landscape does not replicate this natural habitat. Staff recommends that the understory seedlings be located among overstory deciduous trees. Additionally, staff recommends larger quantities of seedlings in each grouping. The prairie seeding will need ongoing maintenance and monitoring to insure successful establishment of the plants and that weeds and other invasive plants are controlled. Staff recommends that the columnar Norway maple listed in the plant schedule be replaced by a different columnar tree such as Armstrong red maple, Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species. Staff also recommends that in the interest of long-term heath, all species of ash be replaced with alternative species because of the impending threat of the emerald ash borer. Staff recommends that landscaping be increased at the base of the retaining walls along the east property line to include shrubs, such as Chokeberry (Aroma), that are naturally spreading and have wildlife benefits that would enhance the environment and provide further visual relief of the wall expanse. Increasing the overstory and ornamental plant quantities would help add stronger vertical relief as well. The applicant could also incorporate vines, such as Virginia creeper or Boston ivy, on the walls to add color and interest. Note: Several plant abbreviations are not noted in the plant schedule. They are CD — pagoda dogwood, PN — Austrian pine, SR — ivory silk Japanese tree lilac. Lot Frontage and Parking Location The project fronts on Lyman Boulevard. Parking is distributed throughout the site with the majority west and north of the building. Due to site topography, and the fact that this is a high school with restricted access, it makes sense that the majority of the parking is located to the north and west of the building. The southern access drive, entering the site from the Lyman/Audubon intersection, will be used on a daily basis exclusively for student bus access. Required Parking: Four per classroom or office (207 rooms or 828 spaces) plus one per 150 square feet of seating area within auditoriums (6,400 sq. ft. or 43 spaces). Total 871 spaces. Proposed Parking: 920 spaces. In addition, there are 140 event parking stalls located to the east of the building in the bus corral. Additional angled visitor parking (23) can be accommodated in the drop-off access west of the building entrance. An alternate 48-stall south parking lot is shown (sheet C6.1) for the access drive south of the building. As a comparison, there are 1,030 parking stalls at Chaska High School. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 11 Building Height Building Setback Parking Stalls visitor Parking Setback Hard Surface Coverage Lot Area COMPLIANCE TABLE OI 2 stories N-15'E-40'* W-35'S-35' 871 stalls N-0'E-40'* W-35' S-35' 65% 0.32 acre Chanhassen High School 3 stories @ N-970'E-350' W - 490' S — 260' 920 stalls + 140 event, 48 south alt. and 23 N - 492' E - 308' W-104' S-172' KI'I 94.83 acres @ As part of the site plan review, the developer is requesting a variance to permit a three-story building. *The 40-foot setback is from the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone boundary. LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The developer is proposing a 27-foot light pole with a 3-foot concrete base for area lighting within the parking lot. Single and double -headed light fixtures with square, shoebox type heads are proposed. Plaza lighting in the stadium area is proposed on 15-foot poles. Walkway lighting on 12-foot poles is proposed at the main building entrances with walkway lighting bollards along sidewalks and alternate entrances. Walkway lighting has a 90-degree cutoff to limit light spilling skyward. Section 20-913 (e) prohibits lighting directed skyward except for lighting designed for illuminating the United States of America flag. The developer is proposing spot lights for the flags at the entrance to the building (type DDI on sheet E010). Additionally, the developer is proposing building facade flood lights (type DD on sheet E010) which will be directed skyward to illuminate the building. The installation of such lighting requires a variance approval. S The Planning Commission felt that due to the importance of the building as a community meeting place the architectural lighting should be approved. The developer shows a monument sign at the northwest entrance to the High School. This monument may be a maximum of five feet in height with a display area of 24 square feet. If the School district intends to install a motion sign, they will have to receive a separate conditional use permit. A separate sign permit is required for the monument sign installation. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 12 ACCESS Access to the site is proposed via three driveways off Lyman Boulevard. The southerly access is at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road. The middle access is at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Lake Hazeltine Drive. The northerly access is approximately 800 feet south of the Twin Cities and Western Railroad. Pedestrian access is provided at each of the driveway entrances as well as a connection to the Bluff Creek trail in the northeast corner of the site. Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalk/trails connect. A traffic study was included in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet identifying projected traffic volumes and analyzing the proposed access points onto Lyman Boulevard. Carver County has reviewed the proposal and has given preliminary approval of the accesses. The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses. Carver County has begun background studies for the future widening of Lyman Boulevard. Design details are not available. However, based on the projected traffic volumes, Lyman Boulevard will likely be reconstructed as a four -lane divided roadway. It is anticipated that the widening of Lyman Boulevard will take place prior to the high school opening in Fall 2009. The existing one-half right of way of Lyman Boulevard adjacent to the property is 50 feet wide. The school district will dedicate an additional 10 feet as a roadway, drainage and utility easement. The 60-foot one-half right of way will accommodate the future widening of Lyman Boulevard. The northernmost access is approximately 880 feet south of Galpin Boulevard. The southernmost intersection aligns with Audubon Boulevard to the south and will be for bus ingress and egress. This access lies within the electrical substation property; therefore, ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska. The remaining access to the site lies 950 feet south of the northern access and 700 feet north of Audubon Boulevard. The wetland north of this driveway dictated the access location. The proposed driveways are 30 feet wide and drive aisle widths are 26 feet wide, which meets the minimum requirements of the City Code. Traffic Improvements Based on the analysis in the Traffic Impact Study, the existing roadway network will accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed Chanhassen High School if the following mitigation measures are implemented by opening day of the school: Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 13 . Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection. • Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for the addition of a north leg to the intersection. • Construct the following turn lanes: Approach Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North Bypass lane School Access Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North 200 feet School Access Westbound North School Access at Through lane becomes 300 feet Lyman Boulevard turn lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Dr at Lyman 100 feet Boulevard Westbound Lake Hazeltine Dr at Lyman 300 feet Build Boulevard through/right Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon 200 feet Road South Westbound Lyman Boulevard at 200 feet Audubon Road South Northbound Audubon Road South at Build to add through Lyman Boulevard 1 lane Southbound Audubon Road South at 200 feet Build Lyman Boulevard I I through/right Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 14 Twin Cities 6 Western RR .• POSSIBLE FUTM TRAFFIC SIGNAL — Y i Lake Hazeltine LEGEND Stop sign 'ljr Signalced IMerecction .. 7hough Traffic Lace c>r Bypass Lane r. T"ng TrMTC Lane 1Righl or Len Lare) A - 100 feet B - 2W feet C - 300l et ® LM Wkirne Driveway CONSTRUCT tAFFIC SIGNAL REVISE =FIC SIGNAL N y� No Scala FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS PER CHANHASSEN 2005 AUAR Figure 21 - Recommended New Lane Configurations & Traffic Control New District 112 High School Chanhassen. MN Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 15 In addition, operation of the Lyman Boulevard/Galpin Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road north intersections should be monitored for potential improvements. Both intersections will likely require traffic signals and additional turn lanes in the future. Impacts to Regional System The following corridors will be at or over capacity in the future whether or not the high school is built. They should be monitored and appropriate improvements should be made when needed. • Lyman Boulevard east of Lake Hazeltine Drive • Audubon Road (C.S.A.H. 17) south of Lyman Boulevard The final funding allocation for the Lyman Boulevard (C.S.A.H. 18) and Audubon Road (C.S.A.H. 17) improvements will be determined in consultation with the City of Chanhassen, Carver County and the City of Chaska. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The site presents a challenge for grading operations due to the steep grades along the railroad to the north, the gas pipeline running east -west through the northern portion of the site, Bluff Creek to the east and the electrical substation to the south. The six-inch diameter gas pipeline is owned and operated by CenterPoint Energy and is centered within a 100-foot wide easement. CenterPoint is allowing up to four feet of fill over the gas pipeline. Two crossings are proposed over the pipeline: a trail on the east side from the tennis courts to the stadium and a concrete walk from the parking lot to the stadium. The HydroCAD calculations submitted indicate that the 100-year elevation of the wetland/wedand mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point will extend onto Lyman Boulevard and the access. Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland/wetland mitigation and Lyman Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100-year event. The proposed ponds along Lyman Boulevard have been designed to treat runoff from a portion of the east half of Lyman Boulevard. There is no additional land in this corridor of Lyman Boulevard for ponding; therefore, additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future roadway width will be treated in these ponds. Hydrology to the wetland/wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point must be maintained. The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting, which requires separating the storm water inlet pipe from the outlet pipe. The proposed drainage pattern on softball field 1 is from the outfield to the infield due to the grade difference between the railroad tracks and the pipeline easement. The development team should re-examine the proposed grades within the infield of this field to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher's mound. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 16 The pavement grades within the north parking lot can be increased to reduce the height and/or length of retaining walls 12 and 13. The school district may consider reducing the width of the eastern drive aisle of the north parking lot to further reduce the height and/or length of these retaining walls. Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner. Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must be approved by the appropriate private utilities. Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan. The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer. Pond, drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT All stormwater ponds must be accessible for maintenance purposes. The plans must be revised to accommodate a 20-foot wide access lane for maintenance vehicles and equipment for Pond 3. It is recommended that this access be provided from the southeast comer of the bus corral to the flared -end section at the south end of Pond 3. The slope of the access should not exceed 15%. Manholes with two -foot sumps should be installed as the last road -accessible structures prior to discharge into the storm water pond. This will help to prolong the maintenance interval of the proposed storm water ponds. The project proposes three rain gardens in the main drop-off area of the school. The plans provide a cross-section and general seeding plan. However, more detailed plans should be provided. The revised plans should include: details regarding the subsoil mix that will be used, measures that will be taken to counter compaction that has occurred in surrounding native soils, draintile configuration, draintile tie-in and drainage areas for each rain garden. The rain gardens should be designed to draw down in a maximum of 72 hours to ensure mosquito breeding cannot occur. For best results, staff recommends that the rain gardens be planted using minimum 2-inch plugs instead of seed. Additionally, the rain gardens should be mulched with shredded hardwood mulch to keep weeds from invading and to lock in moisture. Concrete pavers are proposed for the drop-off area. In preliminary discussions with the applicant, the applicant indicated that pervious pavers may be used for this area. If pervious pavers are used, the subsoils should be "decompacted" to a minimum of 48 inches prior to paver installation. Additionally, pervious pavers should be installed with a corrected subgrade to ensure adequate drainage. The applicant should work with the City on the final design of pervious pavers, if used, to ensure appropriate design and installation procedures are followed. In order to reduce the demand for potable water for irrigation, the applicant should consider utilizing stormwater ponds as a source for irrigation water. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 17 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including all information required by the NPDES Construction Site Permit should be located at the job trailer. Erosion Control Stable emergency overflows are needed for the proposed ponds on site. The emergency overflows should be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed. The emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re -enforcement mat or fabric and riprap. The plan should include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site. The timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow area. The rate of mulch application should also be included on the plans (2 tons per acre, disc anchored). All riprap/fabric at the flared end section should be installed within 24 hours of flared end section installation. Erosion control blanket should be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3: L All exposed soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tune of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Sediment Control Silt fence that is not placed on the contour must have J-Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet. Temporary sediment basins should be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas. The areas of temporary sediment basins should be labeled on the plan. A temporary and/or permanent sediment pond will need to be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared End Sections (FES) 7 and 8. This should be installed prior to grading and then used as a temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland. If it is used as a temporary pond, it should stay in place until all turf is established. Temporary outlet structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) are needed for the ponds; details should be provided. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 18 Contractors and their subcontractors must receive approval of proposed dewatering methods from the City's project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior to conducting any and all dewatering on -site. Wimco inlet controls or similar should be used to protect all storm sewer inlets. The plans should be revised to include Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A). The plans should be revised to include a concrete washout area. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets should include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. RETAINING WALLS Due to the site constraints outlined in the "GRADING AND DRAINAGE" portion of this report, numerous retaining walls are proposed throughout the site. The locations of the retaining walls are generally shown on the drawing below. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 19 A summary of the proposed walls is as follows: Wall number Approximate length Maximum height 1 143 ft 26 ft 2 180 ft 22.5 ft 3 903 ft 27.6 ft 4 688 ft 29 ft 5 350 ft loft 6 138 ft 2 ft 7 110 ft 13 ft 8 364 ft 13 ft 9 160ft 5ft 10 164 ft 5 ft 11 137 ft 6 ft 12 189 ft 9 ft 13 160 ft 6 ft 14 593 ft loft 15 74 ft 5.5 ft 16 541 ft loft 17 865 ft 28 ft 18 365 ft loft 19 979 ft 6 ft 20 317 ft 11.5 ft 21 739 ft loft 22 225 ft 5 ft 23 115 ft 2.5 ft 24 223 ft 2.5 ft 25 233 ft 11.5 ft The estimated total square footage of the walls is 95,000 square feet. The development team is redesigning the grading for softball field 1 and baseball field 1. This redesign will reduce the height and length of retaining walls in this area. Four -foot high chain link fence will be installed at the top of all of the proposed retaining walls. All retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by an engineer and require a building permit. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 20 UTILITIES A City -owned 18-inch diameter trunk sanitary sewer lies to the east of the site near Bluff Creek. The grading plan indicates that up to one foot of fill and up to two feet of cut is proposed over the existing trunk sanitary sewer on the northeast comer of the site. The type of and the current cover over this pipe is sufficient for the proposed changes. The developer must adjust the manhole elevations according to City standard detail plates. The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine if the high school construction has damaged the pipe. This section of sanitary sewer is scheduled for televising in conjunction with the City's sanitary sewer inflow and infiltration abatement program. If the City televises this sanitary sewer before the high school construction is mobilized, the developer will only be required to televise the line after construction is complete. Eighteen -inch trunk watermain will be installed on the north side of Lyman Boulevard. The school district will be reimbursed $166,424.00 which is the cost difference between the 18-inch trunk and 10-inch lateral watermain. The property was assessed $200,897.79 in 1996 for City Project 91-17, Upper Bluff Creek Sanitary Sewer and Watermain. These assessments have been paid. Based on the assessment rolls, the property was only assessed for trunk sanitary sewer and watermain; therefore, the trunk water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued. The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds. Based on the proposed utility plan, an irrigation meter is required. The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer, existing overhead utilities and existing gas pipelines. Mylar and digital as-builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver County coordinates. MISCELLANEOUS The project is planned to utilize two petroleum storage tanks (for fuel oil and diesel fuel) to support facility operations. The fuel oil tank will be a I0,000-gallon underground fiberglass tank with electronic monitoring and double -walled underground piping. This fuel will be piped to the boilers and is designed to serve as backup fuel for the boilers in case of natural gas supply interruption. The diesel fuel tank will be a 2,700-gallon, skid -mounted above -ground storage tank, piped to a 1,500 KW diesel -powered electrical generator to be used to provide backup electrical power should the normal power supply be interrupted. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 21 Emergency response plans for releases from either fuel storage tank shall be included within the emergency evacuation/response plan. Also, due to the capacity of the diesel fuel storage tank, a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan will need to be prepared and implemented. The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls). Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. The utility plans (marked preliminary) were not reviewed by the building official. A detailed building plan review cannot be done until complete plans are provided. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT The site is partially within the Meadowlands Region of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. This region of the overlay district is characterized by fragmented forest communities, high quality wetlands and diverse wildlife populations. The goals set forth in the City's Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan ("Bluff Creek Plan') for the Lowlands Region are to: 1. Preserve high -quality wetland systems, riparian areas and remaining forests; 2. Regenerate impaired ecosystems, especially wetlands, to the extent practical under the present land use constraints; 3. Re-create natural links between major natural features within the Bluff Creek corridor; and 4. Development of environmental educational opportunities within the corridor. Wetlands A and B are being restored by the Minnesota Department of Transportation as mitigation for wetland impacts that occurred in conjunction with the construction of Trunk Highway 212. The restoration project was envisioned as part of the Bluff Creek Plan and is a result of cooperation between MnDOT, the City and the school district. It will enhance the vegetative communities along Bluff Creek, restore a portion of the creek to a more natural profile and improve the hydrology of the wetland complex. The school district dedicated an easement to MnDOT as part of the project for some of the mitigation to occur on school district property. The construction activities associated with the proposed project should not conflict with the easement granted to MnDOT. The project proposes construction of an access road through a portion of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The encroachment into the primary zone requires a variance (see attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation for variance justification). This road is necessary for safety purposes Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 22 to maintain separation between bus and automobile traffic. To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor, the applicant should submit a plan for the restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor (including the drainageway along the north side of the substation and the area east of the bus/event entrance) with species consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan. WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT WETLANDS Four Ag/Urban wetland basins exist on -site. Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. delineated the wetlands in July 2006. Wetland A is a 6.03-acre Type 2/3/6/7 wetland located in the northeast corner of the property. It contains a swale that drains the northern portion of the site to the wetland complex in the eastern portion of the site, adjacent to Bluff Creek. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass, box elder, cottonwood, elms and willows. The applicant is proposing to impact 0.82 acres of wetland A for the construction of a stadium. Wetland B is a 17.94-acre Type 2 wetland located in the east central portion of the project. It contains a swale that drains the southern portion of the site to the wetland complex in the eastern portion of the site, adjacent to Bluff Creek. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass and contains cattails and willows. The total proposed impacts to wetland B are 0.77 acres for the construction of the southwest parking lot and the eastern bus access. Currently the plans show two wetland boundaries for this wetland, specifically in the southwest corner of the wetland. The plans should be revised to show the delineated wetland boundary. Wetland C is a 0.23-acre Type 2 wetland located along Lyman Boulevard in the southwestern corner of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass. No impacts are proposed to Wetland C. Wetland D is a 0.40-acre Type 2/3 wetland along Lyman Boulevard on the western edge of the property. The wetland has been altered historically by fanning and draintile and is dominated by com, nightshade and reed canary grass. However, it is still a jurisdictional wetland. The applicant is proposing 0.10 acres of impact to wetland D to allow for the construction of the northwestern access. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. All wetlands and wetland buffer areas should be protected by silt fence during grading. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures must maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 23 Wetland Mitigation The applicant is proposing to create 2.57 acres of New Wetland Credit (NWC) and 0.81 acres of Public Value Credit (PVC). The mitigation will occur at seven different locations, four of which will be adjacent to the Bluff Creek wetland complex. Wetland replacement must occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The new wetland credit needed to satisfy the Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420) is 3.38 acres with a minimum of 1.69 acres in the form of new wetland credit and the remainder in public value credit. The applicant is proposing to meet the requirements with 2.57 acres of NWC and 0.65 acres of PVC. Wetlands C and D are proposed to be restored as part of the overall mitigation plan for the property. The applicant should provide additional information as to how the vegetative communities and hydrology will be re-established in these areas. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan should be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan should include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans should show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant should provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. The applicant must submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit should be effective for no less than five years from the date of final approval. The applicant should submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit. OTHER AGENCIES The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Carver County, Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that City Council adopt the following four motions and adoption of the attached findings of fact and recommendation: A. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Rezoning of the Chanhassen High School site from Agricultural Estate District, A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office and Institutional District, OU Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 24 B. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek Corridor with a Variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary zone, in conformance with the grading plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07, subject to the following conditions: 1. The construction activities associated with the proposed project shall not conflict with the easement granted to MnDOT for its wetland mitigation project. 2. To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor, the applicant shall submit a plan for the restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor (including the drainageway along the north side of the substation and the area east of the bus/event entrance) with species consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan." C. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Site Plan with Variance for a three-story building and up lighting for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots, plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas, plazas and scenic overlooks. Bicycle parking pads and storage racks shall be provided on site. 2. The developer shall include angled visitor parking in the drop-off access west of the building entrance. 3. The building fagade flood lights shall be deleted allowed during school events and activities. 4. Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalks or trails connect. 5. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by opening day of the school: Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection. Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for the addition of a north leg to the intersection. • Construct the following turn lanes: Ipproach Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North Bypass lane School Access Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North 200 feet School Access Westbound North School Access at Through lane becomes 300 feet Lyman Boulevard turn lane Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 25 Approach Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 100 feet Lyman Boulevard Westbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 300 feet Build Lyman Boulevard through/right Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon 200 feet Road South Westbound Lyman Boulevard at 200 feet Audubon Road South Northbound Audubon Road South at Build to add through Lyman Boulevard lane Southbound Audubon Road South at 200 feet Build Lyman Boulevard throw hhi ht 6. Building Official Conditions: a. The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems. b. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls). d. Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 7. Fire Marshal Conditions: a. A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. c. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.3. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 26 d. Yellow curbing and "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of signs to be installed. e. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.4. 8. Forester Conditions: a. Increase plantings for parking lot area in order to meet ordinance requirement of 156 trees. b. Replace Black Hills spruce seedlings with white spruce. c. Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected. Fencing shall be installed around trees prior to grading. d. Understory seedlings shall be located among overstory deciduous trees. e. The applicant shall increase the quantity of seedlings planted in each grouping. f. All deciduous seedlings shall be protected by tree tubes. Tubes shall be monitored and removed at the appropriate time. All tubes shall be fitted with protective bird netting. g. All ash trees shall be replaced by an alternative species. h. The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yard plantings along the east property line. Native shrubs and vines shall be incorporated into the landscape in addition to trees. i. The columnar Norway maple shall be replaced with a different columnar tree such as Armstrong red maple, Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species. 9. Engineer Conditions: a. The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses to Lyman Boulevard. b. ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska to construct the access through the substation property. c. Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland/wetland mitigation and Lyman Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100-year event. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 27 d. Additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future width of Lyman Boulevard will be treated in the ponds. e. Hydrology to the wetland/wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point must be maintained. f. The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting. g. The development team should reexamine the proposed grades within the infield of softball field 1 to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher's mound. h. Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner. i. Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must be approved by the appropriate private utilities. j. Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan. k. The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer. 1. Pond, drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands. in. The developer must adjust the sanitary sewer manhole elevations according to City standard detail plates. n. The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine if the high school construction has damaged the pipe. If the City televises this sanitary sewer before the high school construction mobilized, the developer will only be required to televise the line after construction is complete. o. The school district will be reimbursed $166,424.00 which is the cost difference between the 18-inch trunk and 10-inch lateral watermain. p. Trunk water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued. q. The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds. r. Based on the proposed utility plan, an irrigation meter is required. s. The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer, existing overhead utilities and existing gas pipelines. t. Mylar and digital as-builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver County coordinates. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 28 10. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions: a. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner compliant with the project's Wetland Alteration Permit, Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). b. The project shall comply with the conditions of its Conditional Use Permit for Development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. c. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including all information required by the NPDES Construction Site Permit shall be located at the job trailer. d. Stable emergency overflows shall be provided for the proposed ponds on site. The emergency overflows shall be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed. The emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re -enforcement mat or fabric and riprap. e. The plan shall include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site. The timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow area. The rate of mulch application shall also be included on the plans (2 tons per acre, disc anchored). f. All riprap/fabric at the flared end section shall be installed within 24 hours of flared end section installation. g. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: TTyW of Slone Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. h. Silt fence that is not placed on the contour shall have J-Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet. i. Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas. The areas of temporary sediment basins shall be labeled on the plan. A temporary and/or permanent sediment pond shall be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared End Sections (FES) 7 and 8. This shall be installed prior to grading and then used as a temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland. If it is used as a temporary pond, it should stay in place until all turf is established. Temporary outlet Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 29 structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) shall be provided for the ponds; details should be provided. j. Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering methods from the City's project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior to conducting any and all dewatering on -site. k. Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets. The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A). in. The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area. n. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. o. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (i.e., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. D. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on the site of the Chanhassen High School, plans prepared by Pinnacle Engineering, dated February 9, 2007, subject to the following conditions: 1. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. All wetlands and wetland buffer areas shall be protected by silt fence during grading. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans. 2. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). 3. The applicant shall provide additional information as to how the vegetative communities and hydrology for Wetlands C and D will be re-established. 4. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 30 5. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Letter from Jay R. Pomeroy to Bob Generous dated January 31, 2007 4. Chanhassen High School Building Design Narrative dated January 15, 2007 5. Chanhassen High School Key Sheet and Exterior Color Scheme 6. Reduced Copy Site Reference Plan Sheet C0.0 7. Reduced Copies Grading and Drainage Plans Sheets C3.1- 3.4 8. Reduced Copy Site Retaining Wall Plan Sheet 3.5 9. Reduced Copies Utility Plan Sheets C4.1- C4.4 10. Reduced Copy Erosion Control Plan Sheet C5.0 11. Reduced Copies Site Finishing Plan Sheets C6.1 - C 6.4 12. Reduced Copies Landscape Plan Sheets C7.1- C7.4 13. Reduced Copies Floor Plan Sheets A101- A103 14. Reduced Copy Building Elevation Sheet A301 15. Reduced Copies Electric Site Plan Sheets E010 and E011 16. Letter from Steven Von Bargen (Center Point Energy) to Robert Generous dated 2/15/07 17. Letter William Monk (City of Chaska) to Robert Generous dated 2/23/07 18. Site Profile 19. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List g.Nplan\2007 planning c \07-06 chanhamn high schwhstaff report chanhamen high school.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. and Independent School District 112 for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office and Institutional District, OI; Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots; Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District; and Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on site. On March 6, 2007, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. and Independent School District 112 for a High School Campus including rezoning, site plan review with variances, conditional use permit with variances and a wetland alteration permit. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned A2, Agricultural Estate District, and PUD, Planned Unit Development. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office Institutional and Office/Industrial. 3. The legal description of the property is: see Exhibit A. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance contingent on approval of the variances. d. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Conditional Use Permit: a. The proposed project will not be detrimental to or enhance the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. The proposed project will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. C. The proposed project will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. The proposed project will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed project will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed project ill not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed project will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed project will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed project will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. The proposed project will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed project will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. The proposed project will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. 6. Site Plan Review: a. The proposed project is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. The proposed project is consistent with the site plan review requirements; The proposed project preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; d. The proposed project creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. The proposed project creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1). An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2). The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3). Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4). Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. The proposed project protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Variance (Bluff Creek Primary Zone Encroachment): 3 a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre- existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre- existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. Finding: The granting of the variance to encroach in to the Bluff Creek primary zone is unavoidable due to the configuration of the Audubon Road (C.S.A.H. 17) and Lyman Boulevard (C.S.A.H. 18) intersection and the access to the site. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: Entrance drives are generally not as proscribed as that for the High School site. The encroachment in to the primary zone is unavoidable. C. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The location of the entrance drive does not increase the value or income potential of the high school site. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The hardship is not self created since the variance is unavoidable due to the configuration of the Audubon Road (C.S.A.H. 17) and Lyman Boulevard (C.S.A.H. 18) intersection and the access to the site. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. The project will create additional buffer zones and enhance the bluff creek corridor. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent Property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. n 8. Variance (Three Story and uplighting): a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. Finding: The need for a variance is due to the type and function of building as a school and the direction that the city provided the school to try to reduce site grading. The construction of a walkout type building is warranted. Normally, the lower, basement, level would not be included as a story. However because the lower floor elevation is more than 12 feet, it is by definition a story. Additionally, the intent of the up lighting is to highlight the building and provide a means to further identify the site. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which the variance is based are unique to the proposed development of the site for a high school. C. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel, but to the utilization of the site in an efficient manner and to provide an enhanced identity to the building. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self -mated hardship. Finding: The alleged difficulty or hardship is due to direction provided by the city. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. The up lightning shall be limited in its duration and only during events or activities at the school. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 9. The planning report #07-06 dated March 6, 2007, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning, conditional use permit with variance, site plan with variances and a wetland alteration permit for the Chanhassen High School Campus. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 60' day of March, 2007. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman BI PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Per Warranty Deed Document No. 148445) That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast corner thereof, thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest corner thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest comer thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East VI 550.00feet along said east line to the point of beginning. Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest corner of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION r�r Qc Applicant Name and Address: Anderson -Johnson Associates Inc 7F75 Golden llalloy Roa`i� #Inn Minneapolis, MN r5497 Contact: Jay Pomeroy. LLA Phone:763-544-7129 Fax: 763-544-0531 Email: joomerov@aiainc.net Planning Case No. 01 ^ () (.Z' CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 0 2 2007 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Owner Name and Address: Chaska Area Schools - ISD #11 11 peavey Pond rhackaMN FFA1R Contact: Steve pumper Phone:952-556-6261 Fax:952-556-6269 Email: pumpers@district112.ora NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment X Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development' X Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review X Site Plan Review (SPR)` Subdivision' Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (VAC) X Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment _X Notification Sign - $200 (City to install and remove) X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attomey Cost" - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds -$450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE § An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. 'Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. "Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME: New High School - Chanhassen LOCATION:_ Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attachment TOTAL ACREAGE: 94.85 Acres WETLANDS PRESENT: X YES NO PRESENT ZONING: A-2 (Agricultural Estate District) REQUESTED ZONING: I-0 PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Office Industrial or Public/ Semi -Public REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: See attached letter This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owners Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Feb. 2. 2007 I aplicent Date Feb. 2. 2007 Signature of Fee Owner Date G:\pLANVorrns\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 12/05 January 31, 2007 Mr. Bob Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 ANDERSON-JOHNSON �� ASSOCIATES, �— INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING City OF CHANRAtM RECEIVED FEB 0 2 2001 RE: Development Review Application Proposed New High School - Chanhassen Chaska Public Schools - ISD 112 Dear Mr. Generous: On behalf of Independent School District #112 and Rozeboom Miller Architects, we are pleased to provide the enclosed information in support of the proposed New High School in Chanhassen. With this packet, we are applying for the following permits: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Rezoning (from A2 to O-I) Site Plan Review Variances Wetland Alteration Permit As you know, the School District received approval for an Interim Use Permit (for early grading work) and received acceptance of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) from the City of Chanhassen in December 2006. We understand that receipt of this application and supportive information, and your determination of the packet's completeness, will allow us to be on the March 6, 2007 Planning Commission agenda. General Project Description Existing Conditions The 94.8 acre parcel is bordered along its north side by the Twin Cities &Western Railroad; to its west and south by Lyman Blvd.; and Bluff Creek and its adjacent wetlands to the east. Chaska's electrical substation lies between the school's south property line and the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road. The majority of the property is currently farmed for agricultural purposes with the highest point of the site and the steep grades along its east boundary are made up of native grasses and trees. A fairly significant wooded area lies along the south edge of the property. The old farm homestead, with some remnants still remaining, lies in the southwest VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER • SUITE 200 - 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD • MINNEAPOUs, MN 55427 PHONE (763) 544-7129 • FAx (763) 544-0531 !CANNED corner of the site just opposite Hazeltine Lake Drive. Existing wetlands predominantly lie along the east edge of the property with localized fingers extending at the north and south edges of the Property toward the west. Approximately 25 acres of wetlands areas exist within the property limits. The topography of the property vanes in elevation from 985 at the lowest point (east) to 1075 at the top of the grass bluff in the center of the site. Because the center of the site is at the highest elevation, drainage typically is directed toward the extents of the property eventually reaching either the bluff creek wetlands to the east or to the Lyman Boulevard ditch to the west and south. Drainage immediately south of the bluff will be carried to Bluff Creek via a fairly significant natural gorge immediately north of the electrical substation. Domestic water is available at the northwest the northeast corners of the site. A 12" water main extends approximately 200, south of the northeast property comer where it terminates. Water off the northwest corner of the property actually lies north of the railroad tracks and at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Galpin Boulevard. Sanitary (trunk) sewer is located along the length of the east property line and connects the neighborhood to the north to a point extending south of the Lyman Blvd. and Audubon Drive intersection. Proposed Site hnnrovements - Complete Build -out The new high school campus includes parking for approximately 1,000 cars, bus parking for approximately 30 buses and overflow and event parking for an additional 80 vehicles. Three entrance drives of Lyman Boulevard provide access to the school site. The south entrance drive is at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road and will primarily support bus and event parking. The proposed entrance drive at the southwest corner of the site, at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Lake Hazeltine Drive, will serve for limited ingress/ egress. The entrance drive west of the school will serve as the primary/ main entrance for students, visitors and service deliveries. With the existence of the Magellan gas pipeline north of the school and north parking lot, the athletic facilities find themselves north of the pipeline easement. The exception to this is the proposed tennis courts and soccer fields which lie just south of the Magellan easement and are located northeast and northwest of the building, respectively. Softball and baseball facilities are located in the northwest quadrant of the site and are tucked between the gas main and railroad tracks. The running track and field stadium, which is aligned in a northwest -southeast direction will be carved into the hillside to allow the home bleachers to transition from an upper spectator plaza down to the field level. Home bleachers for 1,600 spectators and visitor bleachers for 800 spectators are provided. Field events, including high jump, long/triple jump, pole vault, shotput, and discus are located along the east and southeast corners of the running track. Practice fields will be developed in the northeast quadrant of the site and tucked between the railroad tracks and existing wetland areas. We have met with Carver County regarding the potential upgrades of Lyman Boulevard. We understand that until there is a "Design and Construction Agreement"between Carver County and SCANNED the cities of Chanhassen and Chaska, formal design of Lyman Blvd. cannot take place. With that in mind and in an effort to anticipate the impacts of the Lyman Blvd. upgrades, we have provided a general layout for the proposed 4-lane roadway with turn -lanes into/ out of the school site. Bob, with this application we are providing the following information: 1. Completed application - Development Review Application; 2. Fees will be submitted directly by ISD # 112 as follows: a. Conditional Use Permit (CUP): $425 b. Rezoning (from A2 to O-I): $500 C. Site Plan Review: $500 + $4 000 (see note below) d. Variances: e. Wetland Alteration Permit: f. Notification Sign and Escrow: $200 $275 $850 3. Legal Description of property; 4. Plan Sheets (16 full-size sets folded, (1) 11 "x17" copy and (1) 8.5"xl 1 5. Costs associated with the Trunk Water Main along Lyman Boulevard; 5. Colored renderings (6 copies); 6. Disk (PDF files of the Plan Sheets). We trust the enclosed information satisfies the City's requirements. If you have any questions or require additional or revised information, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Jay R. Pomeroy, LLA Project Manager enclosure cc: Steve Pumper - Chaska Public Schools - ISD 112 Steve Miller - Rozeboom Miller Architects Mark Bosch - Bossardt Corporation SCANNED a-M•A CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL JANUARY 15, 2007 BUILDING DESIGN NARRATIVE BUILDING PLAN The new Chanhassen High School will be constructed for 2000 students, grades 9-12. The total area of the building is 405,000 which is about equal to the recently expanded Chaska High School. When completed, Independent School District 112 will have two high schools with a total district high school capacity of 4000 students. The building is designed with three distinct functional components — Academic, Performing Arts, and Physical Education/Athletic — composed around a central commons space that contains the primary public entrance, student dining, student support services, and building administration. The public entrance to the building and central commons faces west, toward Lyman Blvd., and will be visible from the north and central access drives. The southern access drive, entering the site from the Lyman/Audubon intersection, will be used on a daily basis exclusively for student bus access. The student bus entrance is on the east side of the building, also with access to the central student commons, directly opposite the main public entrance. This arrangement of entrances will enhance supervision and security of the main public spaces of the school. The Academic Wing of the building is accessed from the student commons and extends south. It is composed of four classroom areas, each sized for 500 students. Two of the 500 student classroom areas are on the 1" Floor Level and two are on the 2nd Floor Level. The Media Center is in the center of the Academic Wing, two stories in height, and accessible from both floor levels of student classroom space. The science classrooms are located on the south end of the Academic Wing, 6 per floor level, facing south, with a shared greenhouse on the 2"d floor level. On the lower floor level, below the Academic Wing, is a partial floor area containing the art classrooms and industrial technology classrooms. This walkout level is advantageous because it keeps these classrooms near the academic area, allows vehicular access from the to the shop areas, and access to the outdoor site areas from the art classrooms. The Performing Arts Wing of the building is also accessed from the student commons and extends to the northwest. This is a single story area that includes a 650 seat auditorium, a multi -purpose black box theater, and the music department comprised of three large rehearsal rooms and numerous support spaces, Also adjacent to the student commons on the north side is the food service, comprised of a full service preparation kitchen and large serving area capable of serving up to 600 students in each of three lunch periods. The Physical Education/Athletic area is in the northeast quadrant of the building, also accessed from the student commons. The student commons will serve as a lobby and concessions area for athletic events. The PE/Athletic area includes a main competition gymnasium with 2000 moveable bleacher seats, and three full sized basketball courts when the bleachers are not deployed. The area also includes three other multi -purpose gymnasium courts, a wrestling room, fitness room, weight room, locker rooms. The floor level of the courts is one story below the student commons area, so that the bleachers are top -loaded. A running track circles the Rn,ohnnm AAillar Arrhitartc Rana 1 competition gymnasium at the commons level and also provides access to the bleachers. BUILDING EXTERIOR The building exterior was designed to be welcoming and expressive of the learning qualities of the school, using natural materials to create a sense of warmth and timelessness. The exterior building materials include two colors of brick and one color of cast stone. The two brick colors are composed horizontally to emphasize the connection to the geology of the natural site and to emphasize the walk -out level on the east side. The lighter colored cast stone is integrated as vertical planar accents at the significant architectural elements of the building: the entrance, the commons, the fly loft, the team resource areas, and the science wing. Natural light is essential to the learning environment. Windows are organized in a hierarchy of groupings and sizes from the punched openings at each classroom, to the large storefront windows in the team resource areas, to the clerestory windows and curtain walls that will flood the most common areas of the building with natural light and capture views of the natural wetland areas near the school. While the building is three stories in height, the mass of the building is embedded into the existing hillside, so that from the west the building will appear only two stories in height and from the east the final building height will be about one story higher than the elevation of the existing natural hillside. BUILDING SYSTEMS Exterior Construction: Typical Masonry Exterior Walls: Masonry cavity walls with 8"-12" CMU structural backup, 2" rigid insulation, 2" airspace and 4" masonry veneer, typical. Brick will have special patterns and/or blends. Brick to be modular size, wood -mold, sand -faced equal to Belden Brick. 4' thick architectural pre -cast panels integrally colored and sandblasted in lieu of brick veneer at up to 25% of wall surface, window sills, copings, etc. Metal Panel Walls: Aluminum Composite Panels equal to Alucobond. Gymnasium/Fly Loft Exterior Walls: Masonry cavity walls with 10" pre -cast concrete wall panel backup, with 2" rigid insulation, 2" airspace and 4" masonry veneer typical. Brick will have special patterns and/or blends. Brick to be modular size, wood - mold, sand -faced equal to Belden Brick. Interior precast wall surface to have sandblasted or acid etched texture and pattern of reveals at the Gymnasium. Walls to have a KalWall clerestory at the Gymnasium. Sheet metal flashing and trim (Fascia, Roof Edge, Spandrels): Prefinished sheet metal, metallic Kynar finish. Windows: Anodized aluminum, thermally broken, fixed and awning windows, with metallic Kynar paint and 1" low-E clear glass, equal to Wausau 3250T. Up to 25% of classroom exterior wall area, typical. Rn7ohnnm KARIAr Grrhitartc pans 9 Storefront/Entrance Framing/Curtain Wall: Anodized aluminum frame, thermally -broken, with metallic Kynar paint and 1" low-E clear glass, equal to Wausau Superwall 6250 SW with 2" frame width. Clerestory Windows at Commons Areas, Media Center, Main Corridors: Cast channel glazing equal to Profilit by Pilkington, with anodized aluminum frame, thermally broken; translucent areas will contain insulation. General Roofing System: 75% of area to be flat roofs: 4-ply ballasted built up roofing system, equal to Garland, 4" average depth poly-iso, tapered and flat rigid insulation. All roof slopes created with tapered insulation (not sloping structure) except at the gymnasium. 25% of area to be visible sloping roofs: standing seam metal roofing system. Interior Construction: Partitions: Masonry non -load bearing partitions, full height to underside of structure, at all interior and exterior classroom walls, public corridors and commons areas. Exposed face brick at commons and IMC areas. Burnished CMU at corridors. Painted CMU inside classrooms and at building service areas and service corridors. Abuse -resistant drywall on metal studs at party -walls between classrooms, office areas, and support areas within media center. Party walls between classrooms to be double 3-5/8" steel studs with 4" acoustic batt insulation. Drywall partitions full height to underside of structure. Special Wall Surfaces: The auditorium and auditorium/commons walls and ceilings will be clad in pre -finished wood veneer wall panels; lobby doors to the auditorium, control room and adjacent lobby walls will be clad in the same panels to match. The lobby support spaces will be clad in brick masonry to match adjacent exterior walls. Interior Windows & Doors: Hollow metal frames; full height sidelights at classroom doors; hollow metal windows typical at classrooms and offices; aluminum storefront system @ office, media center, and misc. openings into commons — spandrel glass where aluminum storefront meets structural elements. Doors: Assume Flush Panel Wood Doors throughout spaces unless noted otherwise. Assume Hollow Metal Doors and Frames at all service spaces. Glazing: 1" Insulating Glass w/ low —e coating at exterior aluminum curtain wall/windows. Pn7ahnnm Millar Arrhitortc Pana I " _ clear float glass / spandrel at interior aluminum storefront systems, and _" clear float glass hollow metal systems. Stairs: Cast in place concrete stairs with terrazzo finish at monumental commons, media center stairs, lobby stair and auditorium steps; concrete -filled steel pan stairs at other building stairs, painted steel ship's ladders serving mechanical rooms and tech level @ auditorium. Railings: Stainless steel guardrails with glass infill panels typical. Casework: Plastic laminate casework w/ solid PVC edging, flush overlay style; heavy duty construction and hardware in classrooms; epoxy resin countertops at science labs and art rooms; hardwood edge at admin/reception desk. Stainless steel countertops at laundry room, training room, and 3d art room. Provide locks for all cabinets. Nurses Room to have all locks upper and lower cabinets. Athletic Equipment: Wall pads, basketball backstops, volleyball inserts, gymnasium divider curtains, scoreboards, wrestling mat hoist, pole vault pit with cover. Gymnasium Flooring: 3-station competition gym will be wood sports floor system; 3-station Phy. Ed. gym will be resilient sports flooring. Telescoping Bleacher Seating: (2000 seats at main gymnasium): Molded plastic seats on steel frame. Power assisted action. Irwin or Hussey. Lockers: Student hall lockers: Single tier, all welded, powder -coated steel, 5'-0"x 12" x 15" standard. Athletic lockers: Alternate Double -Tier and Five -Tier, all welded, expanded metal. Powder - coated steel. 6'-0"x 15" x 15" standard. Toilet Partitions: Provide stainless steel floor mounted toilet partitions. Food Service Equipment: Full service kitchen. See equipment list from food service consultant. New Proscenium Theatre: The new high school theater will be a 650 seat proscenium theatre that will support a wide variety of music, drama, and special events. The theater will include a full fly house with counterweight rigging and a gridiron for service access above the stage. Stage width and depth will support large musical theatre productions, and a full orchestra pit will be provided for the musicians. A system of catwalks and galleries will provide lighting and rigging access throughout the theatre. Rn7ohnnm Millor Arrhitartc Pana A Stage lighting fixtures will be located at catwalks and on box boom structures in front of and on either side of the stage. Circuits will be provided at these locations and will be wired to permanent dimmers. These dimmers will be remotely controlled by a portable lighting control console. There will also be smaller, user-friendly control panels installed at strategic locations for the control of houselights and work lights. The lighting of the audience will consist of dimmable quartz lighting with an emphasis on stairs, aisles and egress points. Specialty fixtures will be integrated into the interior design to accentuate architectural details. The auditorium lighting will be designed for maximum lamp life and ease of maintenance. Step lights and aisle lights will be utilized throughout the facility as necessary. Quartz floodlights will be provided for work lights on stage. The stage house will contain a counterweight fly system. The rigging will consist of approximately 30 line sets. A fire curtain will be provided at the proscenium opening as required by code. Masking curtains; including black legs, borders, and traveler curtains; will be provided for standard configurations within the stage area. A white "cyclorama" backdrop and black scrim will be included in the rigging package. The stage floor will be sprung and have a painted hardboard or edge grain pine surface. This floor surface will allow scenery to be secured when necessary and may be painted as desired for individual performances. Floor traps will be considered during the Design Development phase. The finish of the floor will be dark and have a low sheen. Lighting and audio control rooms with sliding glass windows will be developed at the rear of the auditorium. A temporary audio mix and lighting control position will also be accessible in the center of the house. Auxiliary control receptacle panels will also be provided throughout the facility to accommodate control consoles, automated lighting fixtures, special effects, etc. Follow spotlight locations will be developed in a dedicated area at the rear of the auditorium. Two metal halide follow spots will be included in the lighting inventory. A continental seating arrangement will be studied to provide maximum comfort and optimum sightlines. Wheelchair locations will be developed to meet ADA guidelines. Seat -end aisle lights will assure safe circulation throughout the auditorium. STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS Academic Wing And Commons: Cast in place reinforced concrete footings, foundations, retaining walls, and slabs on grade. Structural steel frame. Pre -cast concrete plank supported floor slabs with lightweight concrete topping. Steel bar joists and long -span joists with metal roof deck (acoustical deck where exposed). Gymnasium: Pre -cast concrete structural tilt -up wall panels, with masonry veneer. Cast in place reinforced concrete footings, foundations, retaining walls, and slabs on grade. Drain tile below slab and at perimeter footings & under gymnasium floors Rn7.hnnm KAiII.r Arrhitartc pnna 5 Load -bearing masonry with pre -cast concrete plank supported floor slabs at locker rooms and mechanical areas. Long -span steel bar joists and metal roof deck (acoustical deck where exposed) Auditorium: Cast in place reinforced concrete footings, foundations, retaining walls, and slabs on grade. Structural steel column and beam frame at fly -loft with a combination of CMU and metal stud wall infill. Steel bar joists and long -span joists with metal roof deck (acoustical deck where exposed). Auditorium will be a large volume with a visible sloping roof. Metal catwalks hung from roof. Mech. Penthouses: Steel frame, with steel studs and metal panel walls, supporting Pre -cast concrete plank floor slabs with concrete topping and Steel bar joists with metal deck. Rmahnnm NAHIpr Arrhitortc pano fi Key: Architectural Precast T,�vertine Texture Cast Finish a Alum. Curtain Wall Extra Dark/Dark Bronze ® Face Brick MT Shadow Velour Face Brick Coppertone Velour Prefinished Metal Panel Charcoal Gray IRozeboom Miller Architects, Inc. A•Y•A CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL Chant CI 3ctural Precast tine Texture st Finish a Alum. Curtain Wall Extra Dark/Dark Bronze ® Face Brick MT Shadow Velour Face Brick Coppertone Velour Q Prefinished Metal Panel Charcoal Gray Miller Architects, Inc. iASSEN HIGH SCHOOL Chanhassen High School West Elevation: EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME FEBRUARY 16, 2007 u 3 IpyE��� �®fie (Din DOD m I FEI� Tm t I 9{ . i r, &m No e E= a$sz- 8 $ � n 8 =o "a Co - tg [18 Om 9 .m 2n < epK 9 q oC 9m o �=s ez 3'S glla N- x'% Psi 5 yes Sly e�ui NW6 M, N m'd GPI 6 du F 6 LEGEND ......,.............w. ........ ......... ...�.w w>e..a�,.....�.w , ..... �ew.....,�.w... w..�.w ww..�.�. w,aw�..... .a NOTES, RO OE20�� SI NGGx1DING'BUFFEn EXISTING WETLAND N DeuxENrEo wETuxG V 1 1 4 ...e.uo...v rrv. N -- 4 ei L— YMRLINE H •emxul�elw. �� ' vNav DE+e.e� ocnnb xG�nurren 1� 1 CITY SUBMITTAL — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School .0 YNIExwNNiL®e\x¢ GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3.1 W_ v, I MAiONLAII � N Ir LIP LEO i y oeL xeAreowEruxo /� �! , RADWOEaR-0 XO CRAONG euileR /� i DELINEATED WEILANG 'NO GRADING' BUFFER \N\���/ y LEGEND NOTES' f miry/� s \i f F-:j .iewrx.r.is xExSueoweiL.wo tie I DISU1ct 112 Future High School GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN CITYSUBMITTAL I Q3.2 FOR REVIEW ONLY LEGEND lJ �rr�eruxia jr S I 1 1 1 /�1 pgovmE xo a' �' dL A O GPSGING'BWFEP P 'a p7na�' l LaL �e •i i �-t 1 t.. 1 l Y.m.. t l 1 / -Y ix Future High 1 I 1• - r 1 I � � School • + Nc`,oB xna �. i�li xl pll_ ^ NO GP NLG-BUF Fkx IV M�TGNLN1rp � 11 LN . MIiCXllI1F�Mi. r. i •� � �N / - t, .. II ILLLn mo•uwµ:r:'.. _ I .11�. wm....m •...ws ' j '1 �� mow,,,, •.•ra4R� i i i .I. GRADING 8�• DRAINAGE PLAN 1 -- — — — — - CITY SUBMITTAL C3.3 ;' FOR REVIEW ONLY !:1 t "Y' , District 112 Future High Schmi GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL I FOR REC3.4 VIEW ONLY II ® _ LO ijl�}s--! of{ii,ji! }� t1 U 0 I s Q J f Z to 's m3 W _."'.-- �'������•,. A _._,.... NOTES � ..a.... ORATE DElIlTTAR. _ LEGEND PLAN �� •a.o.. �_ -.I II ••• UTIL NOTEII SECTION .-. TL T ONTROL STRUCTUREI....N 1) ul u 'NGGRADMG BUFFER EXISTING WETLAND I DELMEATEnwETLAND rrr 4 I i —M1rLNLNE II rvw.a I MArcx R'aen � � i� District 112 Future High School I VROWOEIBV' / 'NO GRAVING' BUFFER UTILITY PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL C4.1 FOR REVIEW ONLY M4TCMlINE.F Y� �• ; L nnsv. L urnaw77 4 /r. ....�i ..vim DEuxEnTED wETuxD SI: FIS I L J I w y /- 1 0 1 Y i 1 DEUNEATEOWETI b ....... r... FBONBE M'L' 'NOOMOwO' BUFFER DELINE41ED WETIN. PROVIDE 1..d 'NO GRADING' BUFFER NOTES - - LEGEND "MY SEWER SCHEDULE a w T y MITr T IF • —I i -E -a-axn.r u1ra1r i pq wR-v-.n-a Y rt -1 l s-ro.T-nY-.-.bro Eli eiY ~ b - '.f( - RT i yr _ j b --� YBE bN aIIN _..N I__..FE1. 1 -.TMs on -7D°I' -fF i r B N Bi - .1 •.., ib 4D- WY IN iyX- T wr - r -e ~i EN orr 'N2 4T Yial adz — GRATE DETAIL SECTION OUTLETCONTROL STRUCTURE (BASIN ]) CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future Nigh School ^«Fmm NZ' LA UTILITY PLAN C4.2 Y' 4., NOT" .�. LEGEND '-mn war, QD IITILRY NOTES �� OMTE mE ELAN ' SECTION It I AiC=LINE=\i _ MTCMLIWE District 112 Future High School 1 .... FOR REVIEW N Y C4. uTIL" NOTES YLCNLM1E qt'. L MA}CNIWEM � LEGEND NOTE5 CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School UTILITY PLAN 1 +y L E , e6 "a � • �_ � f � �i3 Z 0 LO z 0 ( 1 rr�� Ij{�i i �W U 0 W i60 Ei�s�6 a it o 1\Q [ 0 0 000000 Val • Ifj � �� ti i � �;O 4i �`�" � ',� like L _MP=CxtI=EEf E _ MEn _ 0 os xwx�scxaax n� �1 zd { - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — District 112 Future High School Ngnpa _ Leo SITE FINISHING PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL I C6 P ^ FOR REVIEW ONLY L e e;. YL1Cx�MEM F;d I -- — — —— -- — , JI � District 112 --- Future High -- I School � S1C mamo _ _ NOMS —•~�•� - QD ..o CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY SITE FINISHING PLAN w x S lie �EPi deii� �f((S jj �((� ljfix4l ` e° Fqi€ iJ iiF¢¢gg 1,i if a JO ob JJ 'd z 'ej6 0�3 O.. il! d'I ° d Iltl O r1 y: lj =ge ° C(.) 9 a 7 _� € � e3 I� I i ;(({�[I�qi i �;I L—�\`,�®"/•� i8®�d `a� � � Sd[i see Ij 71FlT7 f x �i fill I I 7 yE 3 2 I E ff At .3 x jI {e i j3+xfFdeF x xxx jj)ix y}y} S I � • W o! - z� p yp ( 1 ° _ g �, is ° : 3 ii i�• @° i° �'1 naxnx�x�w . — _ � T 4F— lFI J . , 1J L_ MR=CHUMEE 01 IRUIOREV O—HHq`JCMWL � - � L E E Ec,BBME wM — — -- .. H -� •. w Y �_ -_ -ui siYWtl r PLANTING,.SEEOIHOTANO—SO[DDIyG NOTES: District 112 Future High School LEGEND 00 PERIMETER BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS BUFFERY.VMN YVIFBRYMOB INTERIOR BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY LANDSCAPING PLAN C7.2 =1= I� :K --------------- o � o r/ •-� _.,.. =-` SQL ;a,;°°`°'!° eoPTo`m'o�� i\ LEGEND \ 0® INTERIOR SUFFERING REQUIREMENTS PIANT:NO,^S—EEOI�NG ryMD-SODDIP��,OTYS q PERIMETER BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS a4. ... ®® 4,6 - - -MATCHUNE 0 District 112 Future High School f LANDSCAPING PLAN — — T 7 17 CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY =AID -I .AZ NLINEN EIANTING, SEEDING AND SODDING NOTES. LEGEND CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future Nigh School LANDSCAPING PLAN C7.4 v st i BUILDING FINIm now E,.e..Twm.E E L RST L L`EE wow ww EEcaxo LEVEL nE w.m .S'F..T CYCIX .. 1W1 CM TI.M i>TPo16E wAIY ' T ELl ME.L� E& BECgTM I 1.., TOTµ [LOIN A YAy Bf X) 01strict 112 Now High I OVERALL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN CITY REVIEW SET A101 District 112 New High School .�wwww;n n,.eunna OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN CITY REVIEW SET A102 BUILDING ?x �� .wenrmoxeLxvnru»..rxe Lox wom 1" LLLR wom eaLEl rre o e.m wrx�ramcucunrwxs voorwmr eNx xvwxer � • laxrn Rowuxu �mooeu MB1rtMXMEn 9QGMOR0.Y MEn W9f VaiOlnl ROdin9G 'W,NY S� la �u i �u lu .. ., .. .. � 1, .. .. I�l District 112 Now High OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN 11v 1 wsrI A11 103 $1 C. ..9 © cm o V re 'ir V U OO 4 o 0 n 0 ?q, xrsa - Q.. i I Fawrv��'w+po I �. I. S Ir ems* Al Jp �eswOPT- ,T , vw� District 112 New Hlph I — BUILDING !ELEVATIONS CITY REVIEW SET A301 m°e Olatdct 112 Future High School _ m1 m °u� PoWt6 - ui. LIONf FIMUeE 8LNEOULE rm�ew �ca+.+ LWK FIXTURE ECHEWLE .".'1S`— "r in Y.'Y .i. S'4•'� 99.'L'M3�SP''t—a e'fi'• UAW g.1-2 a� District 112 Future High School mmwwow ®mueruue�mce PLAN CR Suwmi E011 CenterPoint® Energy Robert Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 690 City Center Drive, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN. 55317 RECEIVED FEB 2 0 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN. RE: Planning Case 07-06 Chanhassen High School Dear Mr. Generous: 700 West Linden Avenue PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 February 15, 2007 Referencing the proposed high school, CenterPoint Energy, a division of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., owns and operates a 6-inch diameter natural gas pipeline located in an easement on the east end of the property. The first easement number 1960-84, was recorded October 28, 1960 in Book 61 of Deeds on page 490. The second easement number 1960-92, was recorded October 28, 1960 in Book 61 of Deeds on page 499-500, Carver County, Minnesota. CenterPoint Energy's pipelines are operated and maintained in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 192, Title 49, "Transportation of Natural and Other Gasses by Pipeline: Minimum Federal Safety Standards. No grading or other earth movement will be allowed in the easement unless other arrangements have been made with CenterPoint Energy. Enclosed is a copy of the "Guidelines for Construction and/or Encroachment Within Gas Pipeline Easements" to aid in any design before approval by CenterPoint Energy. The reduced set of plans that were sent cannot be read. Please forward a large set of plans for review and approval to me at the address below. Our engineering staff will review and make necessary changes to safely maintain the pipeline. Respectfully, CENTERPOINT ENERGY Steven Von Bargen Right -of -Way Administrator P.O. Box 1165 Mpls., MN. 55440-1165 PC: Andrew Balgobin, Administration Engineer Dale Sodahl, Design Technician Cherie Monson, Sales Consultant CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP., D.B.A. CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNESOTA GAS GUIDELINES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND/OR ENCROACHMENT WITHIN GAS PIPELINE EASEMENTS The following are general requirements only. CenterPoint Energy must inspect the area and review construction plans. Final construction plans must be reviewed and approved, in writing, by CenterPoint Energy Engineering prior to the start -of any construction within CenterPoint Energy's easement. Grading and utility plans showing CenterPoint Energy's approval must be on site and available to CenterPoint Energy Personnel during construction within the easement. Soil shall not be removed or placed in a manner that will result in earth or pavement cover over the pipeline of less than three feet or more than five feet unless otherwise approved. A level area of not less than six feet on each side of the pipeline shall be maintained at all times. Slope beyond 6' from the pipeline shall not be steeper than 4 to 1, unless otherwise agreed. Any amount of cut or fill, within the 4 to 1 slope area, shall increase the width of the level area on each side of the pipeline by that same footage of cut or fill. Blasting in the vicinity of any pipeline requires review and written approval by a CenterPoint Energy engineer prior to start. The pipeline must be fully accessible at all times before, during, and after the construction. 2. Landscaping over and within ten feet on each side of the pipeline is restricted to grass cover only. Beyond ten feet on each side of the pipeline, upright plantings are restricted to, and shall not exceed an eventual growth height of six (6) feet. No trees shall be planted or remain within the easement. Any trees, removed by CenterPoint Energy from within the easement, while performing maintenance activities shall not be replaced by CenterPoint Energy or the current owner, their successors or assigns. 3. Any buried utility line installed across the in -place pipeline shall be placed below the pipeline with no less than one foot of vertical separation, padded with well compacted (95% Standard Procter) and cross at an angle between 45 degrees and 90 degrees from the pipeline unless otherwise approved. 4. With prior CenterPoint Energy approval by a Senior Engineer or Right of Way Administrator, parking lots, perpendicular driveways or roadways of portland cement concrete or asphaltic concrete (or similar materials) may be placed within the easement, but shall be limited in width when crossing the easement to minimize the interference with or access to the pipeline for inspection and maintenance. Any contractor equipment movement over the pipeline shall only be at an angle greater than 45 degrees to the pipeline, and must be on a constructed haul road composed of well -graded gravel, 3 feet thick, for a minimum distance of ten feet on each side of the pipeline Permanent structures including, but not limited to, buildings, signs, screen walls, decks, tennis courts, and swimming pools are not allowed under any circumstances within the easement. Installations including, but not limited to, retaining walls and fences crossing the pipeline require approval by the CenterPoint Energy Senior Engineer or the Right of Way Administrator, before construction. All fences crossing the pipeline must have a 10-foot wide gate centered over the pipeline. All fences installed parallel with the pipeline will maintain a minimum of 10 feet of separation from the pipeline. 5. Once CenterPoint Energy and the Owner, Developer or Contractor have reached an agreement, CenterPoint Energy shall be given at least two working days advance notice of planned construction activity so arrangements can be made for CenterPoint Energy Personnel to monitor the construction. CenterPoint Energy will locate and stake the pipeline, but will not assume responsibility to expose or backfill the pipeline or to uetermine the actual elevation of the in -place pipeline. Excavation to expose the pipeline shall be parallel to the pipeline. CenterPoint Energy Personnel must be present during this excavation. Backfill must be free of rocks and shall be compacted to 95% Standard Procter. 6. Any subsequent damage or removals caused by CenterPoint Energy in the exercise of its easements rights, of any and all of those certain foreign constructions (landscaping, driveway, roadway, utility lines, etc.) which may be permitted within the easement area, will be permanently repaired or replaced at the owner's or contractor's (not CenterPoint Energy's) expense. 7. In accordance with Federal Department of Transportation Codes, CenterPoint Energy must place markers over transmission pipelines. These markers will be placed at all road crossings, in back of curb or at property line, at changes of direction and periodically along the pipeline. All natural gas transmission line locating markers placed by CenterPoint Energy will not be removed. If you have any questions call 612.321.5426 or 612.321.5381. January 20, 2005 February 23, 2007 0 Chaska Mr. Robert Generous RECEIVED Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard FEB 2 6 2007 Box 147 Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RE: Planning Case 07-06 Chanhassen High School Dear Bob, The City of Chaska would offer the following two comments to the site plans submitted for the Chanhassen High School: The traffic improvements outlined in the High School EAW dated 11-03-06 should be considered the minimum required to be in place prior to the opening of the school. Said improvements modify the existing street system and are viewed as meeting short-term needs. Reconstructing the portion of Lyman Boulevard impacted by the High School to its ultimate section, as presently being discussed by Chanhassen, Chaska, and Carver County, provides a permanent access solution and is preferable from a traffic flow, safety, and economic viewpoint. 2. Chaska is working with the School District on modifications to its electric substation that will be necessary to allow transfer of the easements to accommodate the access drives to the school and realignment of the entrance drive to the substation. Chaska foresees no problems in resolving these details and furnishing the required easements. If you should have any questions about these comments, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, William Monk City Engineer WM:ms cc: Dave Pokorney, Kevin Ringwald, and Steve Wilker — City of Chaska city of Chaska Minnesota One City Hall Plaza 55318-1962 Phone 952/448-9200 Fax 952/448-9300 •+ • •r rr a r a + r e • • •• e a • • • a • r• c } r • i i i • f• r a• r t—s• r r• Y• r• e r v•• a s f• •.• •.•.• •. r a e v r Y• e e• t a• v• x e- v t 1 r+ r v• \.a •. r l\ f e r•• r t f •a ••• � r • f • e 'v + • I Y • • r H • • • • + • • •a • • • n a i • r � • f • A • • e � r r r • • • • a • v •.• • a as • . a • e a + � I f Y \ r • 6 • r Y H \ • • • • • f •.a + l • f 3 . . • • • I a • a s—•-• : . • + • • r • • • • • s •-a s e + a r.• s, i-u .: r.\ s • • H • . ..... L :: f �.:YSWIYfwN♦ CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on February 22, 2007, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Chanhassen High School — Planning Case 07-06 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. KaWn J. Eng lh t, Dep y Clerk Subscribe and swom to before me this Q22 day of 2007. Notarkublic x KIM T. MEUVVISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota MY CMMISSIMnEXPM Jan 31. 2010 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, March 6, 2007 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later In the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Rezoning, Site Plan Approval with Variances, Proposal: Conditional Use Permit with Variances and a Wetland Alteration Permit — CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL Applicant: Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. and ISD 112 Property North of Lyman Boulevard, south of the Twin Cities and Western Location: Railroad, and west of Bluff Creek A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/sere/Plan/07-06.html. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Questions & Generous by email at baenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Weiland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommentlation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting, • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s), • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have somethinn to be Included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time, Tuesday, March 6, 2007 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later In the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Rezoning, Site Plan Approval with Variances, Proposal: Conditional Use Permit with Variances and a Wetland Alteration Permit—CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL Applicant: Anderson -Johnson Associates Inc. and ISD 112 Property North of Lyman Boulevard, south of the Twin Cities and Western Location: Railroad, and west of Bluff Creek A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/07-06.htmI. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by email at bcenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by Questions & phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written Comments: comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all properly within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. This nap is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a conpilation of records, information and Me mated in various city county, state and federal offices and other sources ragarong the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Infomafion System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, srM the CM does not represent that the GIS Data can he used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose reouihng exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If ermine or discrepancies are found pease correct 952-227-1107, The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 566603, Subd. 21 (20(10), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all clains, and agrees to defend, Indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claim bmught by User, its emptoye n; or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data pmnded. This mad, is neiher a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map Is a compilation of records, information and data leca it in ,aneus city, county, state and taderel Offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to bs used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for naviga Tonal, tracking or any other purpose reouinng evicting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the "am of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found pease comact 952-227-1107. The preceding declaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Standee §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknovAetlges that the Cry shall not De liable for any damages, and expressly waives all darts, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold harness the City from any and all chins brought by User, its enptoyees or agents. or Nird parties which apse out of the users access or use of data provided. Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Chanhassen High School Planning Case No. 07-06 City of Chanhassen Q i n v Lynn W 140.10) � ron°^a 0 Po 9 0 C t N SUBJECT O- L U - PROPERTY ' CR 10 L ron 6W(0.R. 10) ABDALLAH A EL-SANJAK & ALBERT B & JANET K BEETY ALVARO J & NANCY A GOMEZ 1839 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 2193 STONE CREEK DR 8748 VALLEY VIEW PL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8419 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8421 ANCHOR BANK ANDREW J KAYATI III ANTHONY D & PAMELA R STRAND 1055 WAYZATA BLVD E 8715 VALLEY VIEW PL 8640 AUDUBON RD WAYZATA, MN 55391-1812 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8421 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9401 BARRY L & SUZANNE L LIBENGOOD BONITA ANN JUNGELS BRADLEY J & RENEE L VANBERGEN 8950 AUDUBON RD 2338 BOULDER RD 2175 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8412 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 BRIAN T & SONYA A BENKSTEIN BRUCE H & CLARICE G FEIK CARL D RAY & 2292 BOULDER RD 1773 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 2245 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 CARL M JR & KIM A ILIFF CHAD A & JULIE M EVEN CHAD M & JILL C HAKE 1731 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 2198 BOULDER RD 2115 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 CHADWICK HOUWMAN CHARLENE A STENDER CHARLES & DEBRA OLSON 2219 BOULDER RD 2321 BOULDER RD 1748 VALLEY RIDGE PL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8416 CHET A LARSON CHRIS B & LESLIE J ERICKSON CITY OF CHASKA 2259 STONE CREEK DR 1831 SUNRIDGE CT 1 CITY HALL PLAZA CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9663 CHASKA, MN 55318-1962 CRAIG H & HOLLY L MELL CRAIG S & WENDY L O'CONNOR DANA R BENSON & 8670 VALLEY RIDGE CT 1702 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N 2203 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8417 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8415 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 DANIEL J & NANCY R LYNCH DANIEL J & PAMELA J CULHANE DANIEL K & ROBIN L EDMUNDS 2255 BOULDER RD 2333 BOULDER RD 1861 SUNRIDGE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9663 DARYL W & CATHERINE M HARTSEL DAVID D & KATHLEEN A THORP DAVID HESTER & 1851 SUNRIDGE CT 2330 BOULDER RD 2199 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9663 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 DAVID J & LISA M KIRKBRIDE DAVID KESSLER & DAVID M & LORI J KENDALL 2080 BOULDER RD 1750 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N 2063 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8415 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7410 DAVID R & CHERRI A SALTZMAN 1800 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8418 DEAN L & SHELLEY L BUSSEY 2145 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 DEBRALYNNLUDFORD 8615 VALLEY VIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8423 DONALD & JENNIFER HARMS 1783 VALLEY RIDGE PL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8416 DOUGLAS G & SARAH P HIPSKIND 2317 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 DOUGLAS VERNON JOHNSON 2322 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 ERIK M & LISA A MAGNUSON 2001 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7410 GARY L FELDICK & 2231 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 DAVID W & LYNNETTE A BAILEY 2273 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 DEBORAH A HUM & 1761 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 DELORIS B HOLASEK TRUST 2015 STAHLKE WAY CHASKA, MN 55318-3239 DONALD W & CATHY BORGMANN 2308 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-7401 DOUGLAS J WINZENBURG & 1710 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 EDWARD E & ELLEN L RAWSON 2266 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 EUGENE C & JAN M KRUCHOSKI 2030 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 GEORGE W & CAROLE A PHILLIPPE 1711 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 DEAN & LOIS 9111 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9412 DEBRA KAY NOTERMANN 1766 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8415 DENNIS & RUTH CHADDERDON 8900 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8412 DOUGLAS A & CINDY L MERRIGAN 8736 VALLEY VIEW PL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8421 DOUGLAS V & ANN M JOHNSON PO BOX 83 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0083 ERIC & MELISSA NOYES 8622 VALLEY VIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8423 GARY D & JOYCE D THEIS 1696 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9401 GERALD W & JANICE K CRAWFORD 2079 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 GERHARD & HELENE A SCHOCK GERHARD G & SALLIE L BERGESON GREGG J & AMY M KLOKE 2309 BOULDER RD 2220 BOULDER RD 1836 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8418 GREGORY S & SHELLY M SCALLON GREGORY W & SUSAN I PROVO HADI ANBARGHALAMI & 1814 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N 1762 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 8381 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8424 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7417 HOA LE CA IND SCHOOL DIST 112 J T MORTON ENTERPRISES LLC 1738 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N 11 PEAVEY RD 6911 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8415 CHASKA, MN 55318-2321 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9560 JACK R BECKER & JAIME L STERBENZ & JAMES K & MELISSA J CARLSON 1751 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 1848 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 2122 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8418 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 JAMES M & JENNIFER DLARJARED & CHRISTINA A GRUNIG JAY & BARBARA GRIZZLE 2318 BOULDANAGAER 1747 VALLEY RIDGE PL 8760 VALLEY VIEW PL 2318 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8416 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8421 JAYSON & JEANETTE KIRMEIER JEFFREY J & KARLA M ALTHOFF JEFFREY L & JENNIFER T BENKE 2094 BOULDER RD 2326 BOULDER RD 8643 VALLEY RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8417 JEFFREY P & SARAH L WENDORF JEFFREY R & EDITH M STEARNS JEFFREY S & KRISTI J STRANG 2291 BOULDER RD 2052 BOULDER RD 1701 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 JEFFREY T & JUANITA M SCRIBNER JEFFREY W & GAIL H MOODY JERALD D & LISA R STIELE 1780 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 1800 SUNRIDGE CT 8755 VALLEY VIEW PL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9663 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8421 JOEL E & HEIDI M LEHRKE JOEL K & KERI L JOHNSON JOHN & MARDI PERLICH 2329 BOULDER RD 1806 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N 2163 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8424 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 JOHN F & PATRICIA G VANNUCCI JOHN T & JANET K ST ANDREW JOHN T & KELLY A LABATT 1798 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N 1811 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 2109 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8415 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8419 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 JOHN T MORAN JOSHUA T KRIENKE & JURGEN W & CAROL A SEEMANN 2150 BOULDER RD 2375 STONE CREEK DR 8401 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7403 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7422 KAJ & JODI M DOERRING KELLY K MORLOCK & KENNETH A & MARCIA S STRAND 2231 STONE CREEK DR 2325 BOULDER RD 8631 VALLEY VIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8423 KENNETH D & DIANNE W KEMP 2162 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 KYLE S & JACKIE L DUEA 2133 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 LYNDELL F & MARY F FREY 1822 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8424 MARK B & JENNIFER A DAVIDSON 1841 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8419 KEVIN & ELIZABETH ROGERS 2023 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 LAWRENCE P & HOLLY WHITE 8657 VALLEY RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8417 MARK & LAURA THORNE 1827 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8419 MARK R & CARLEEN A LAPINSKI 2103 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 KRISTOPHER E & MINDI L H DAHL 1774 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8415 LDW PROPERTIES LLC 1340 PARK RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9527 MARK A & NANCIANN S OLSON 1792 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8415 MARK R & LAURA G JOHNSON 1807 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8424 MARVIN V & CAROLE J LUECK MERLE & JANE VOLK MERLE L & ELIZABETH J OELKE 2019 STONE CREEK DR 180 WASHINGTON VALLEY RD ATTN: 2242 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7410 NETWORK R CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 , 07921-2120 MICHAEL & JACQUELINE R MROSKO 2305 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 MICHAEL D & BETTY WRIGHT 2280 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 MICHAEL J & MARY M YAZCEC 1813 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8424 MICHAEL A & JULIE A SALENTINE 1784 VALLEY RIDGE PL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8416 MICHAEL D MUFFENBIER & 8652 VALLEY RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8417 MICHAEL J KRYCH & 2127 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 MICHAEL C & JENNIFER ANDERSON 8772 VALLEY VIEW PL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8421 MICHAEL J & JOANNE COCHRANE 1751 SUNRIDGE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9663 MICHAEL JOHN HOLLANDS & 2051 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 MICHAEL R & DANA B HOWE NANCY L WHAYLEN NEIL BUTCHART & 2169 STONE CREEK DR 2334 BOULDER RD 1796 VALLEY RIDGE PL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8416 NORMAN E & KATHLEEN EVILSIZER OUTHAI SOLEYA & P SCOTT & JENNIFER G PHARIS 2207 BOULDER RD 1700 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 1815 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8419 PAMELA K KERBER PATRICK A & BRENDA J TODD PATRICK C & MICHELLE MCNALLAN 8743 VALLEY VIEW PL 1772 VALLEY RIDGE PL 2287 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8421 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8416 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 PATRICK L & SHARON M ARBOGAST PAUL & LINDA SPEKMAN PAUL L & LYNETTE M ERICKSON 1801 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 2121 STONE CREEK DR 2217 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8419 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7420 PAUL P & AMINA M RINKES PAUL R & JENNIFER A SPORS PAUL S & LAURA E GRAVES 2208 BOULDER RD 8658 VALLEY RIDGE CT 8634 VALLEY VIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8417 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8423 PETER G & KRISTIN A TERRELL PHEAVANH SOUVANNALATH & PHILIP D & MARGARET STANDAFER 2136 BOULDER RD 1829 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N 8767 VALLEY VIEW PL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8424 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8421 RICARDO A & RAYLENE S SEGURA RICHARD D & CHRISTINE M BALM RICHARD J & CHERYL A HARTMAN 1740 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 2093 BOULDER RD 2254 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 RICHARD J & PAMELA E SCHWARZ RICHARD L LINDSTROM & ROBERT FU & 2157 STONE CREEK DR 2642 COMMERCE BLVD 1718 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 MOUND, MN 55364-1402 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8415 ROBERT J & CHRISTINE R FINN ROBERT T & AIMEE M O'MALLEY RODDY Y & LAURIE L W ZIVKOVICH 2108 BOULDER RD 1721 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 2337 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 RONALD S & LAURIE A BLUM RORY D & AMY J LEA SALLY E STUCKEY 2081 STONE CREEK DR 2313 BOULDER RD 1785 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7410 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 SCOTT A HANSON & SCOTT H & SUE J FERRELL SCOTT T & NICOLE M BRUSH 2267 BOULDER RD 2243 BOULDER RD 2301 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7401 STEPHEN B & SANDRA L MEYER STEPJEN J & MARY P MONSON STEVE BARKER & 8724 VALLEY VIEW PL 8850 AUDUBON RD 8712 VALLEY VIEW PL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8421 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9407 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8424 THEO A & TERRY L JENSON THOMAS A & SUSAN A KODET THOMTHOMS M & CAROLYN D 2065 BOULDER RD 1741 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S BON 2186 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8414 186 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 THOMAS R & AMY B EDSTROM THOMAS S & SUSAN M TISCHER THOMAS TODD COOK & 10 HILL ST 8729 VALLEY VIEW PL 2037 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9586 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8421 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 THOMAS V & BEVERLY L ANTILLEY THOR C & LYNN M HEIMDAHL THOR E & DAWN K SMITH 2361 STONE CREEK DR 8671 VALLEY RIDGE CT 2139 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7403 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8417 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 TIMOTHY & BRENDA MOORE TIMOTHY G GEEHAN TIMOTHY J & KATHLEEN C BATTIS 1812 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 1819 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N 2066 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8418 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8424 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7407 TIMOTHY J & MARY C KRAFT TIMOTHY J & MELISSA C MCNEILL TIMOTHY N & TERRI L RENDALL 2279 BOULDER RD 1824 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S 2174 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7400 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8418 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 TODD A & JILL M GATES TODD M & DEBORAH S DOLAN TODD M & JONI J NELSON 1795 VALLEY RIDGE PL 2187 BOULDER RD 8610 VALLEY VIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8416 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7402 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8423 TRENT A & KIMBERLY M DAVID WILLIAM B & TERRE D KEMBLE WILLIAM D & LEZLIE M DAWSON 1797 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N 1782 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N 2181 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8415 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8415 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7415 WILLIAM M & LAURI J WEISMAN TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RAILROAD VICORP RESTAURANTS INC 1771 VALLEY RIDGE PL 2925 12TH ST E 400 48TH AVE W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8416 GLENCOE, MN 55336-3368 DENVER, CO 80216-1806 K&V LEASING LLC LAKE REGION MFG CO INC ROLAND A STINSKI 118 PEAVEY CIR 340 LAKE HAZELTINE DR 3647 MCKINLEY ST NE CHASKA, MN 55318-2347 CHASKA, MN 55318-1034 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418-1599 DELORIS B HOLASEK TRUST 2015 STAHLKE WAY CHASKA, MN 55318-3239 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pinnacle Engineering March 71 2007 Mr. Don Asleson City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. TeF. 763 315-4MI 11541 95• Avenue North Fax: 763 31,4W Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 wvro Pmeno. com RE: Response to Wetland Permit Application Comments New High School - Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Pinnacle Proposal Number: MN07038.00 1 Dear Mr. Asleson CIN OF RECEIVED SEN MAR 13 2007 O"HASSEN pLWNINO DEK 1 Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. (Pinnacle), on behalf of Independent School District #112 and Anderson -Johnson and Associates, wishes to respond to the items discussed in your email of February 23, 2007 concerning the wetland permit application dated February 9, 1 2007. The email identified several concerns and comments. In our response, we state the concern or comments followed by additional information or clarification. 1 • What were the other sites considered for the proposed Chanhassen High School? Please include site selection as part of your sequencing discussion. 1 A figure indicating alternative site locations is attached. Alternative Site 1 was rejected due to the non-contiguous nature of the site. ISD #112 requires the school and associated facilities to 1 be contiguous with limited access for the safety and control issues. Alternative Site 2 was rejected due to the cost of the site, smaller acreage, potential greater wetland impacts, and inadequate Site access. 1 • Please provide a sequencing discussion for each impacted wetland. 1 The wetland impacts to the Site were unavoidable due to the topography of the Site. Wetland impact Ii stems from balancing the soils to make a level playing field for the athletic stadium. A 1 retaining wall will be utilized to reduce wetland impacts in this location. Wetland impacts 12 and 13 are caused by the construction of an access road from Lyman 1 Boulevard to the school buildings. The access is needed to meet City requirements of controlled access points to alleviate traffic in the area. Safety issues and controlled access points determined the need for a third access point from Lyman Boulevard. This access point minimizes the 1 wetland impacts in this area. 1 ' Mr. Don Asleson ' Pinnacle Project Number: MN07038.00 March 7, 2007 Page 2 of 5 1 1 Wetland impact 14 is due to the topography of the site and need to balance and level the Site for access from Lyman Boulevard and parking. The access road was moved in an effort to minimize the wetland impact. ' Wetland impact 15 is due to the widening and improving of Lyman Boulevard as a result of the project. No alternative was available to the widening of Lyman Boulevard. • Please provide a map similar to Figure 7 in the application to include existing wetlands boundaries. (11x17 if possible) ' A revised Figure 2 is provided. ' • Will impacting areas 12, I3, I4 and I5 change hydrology to adjacent wetland basins? If not how is hydrology to be preserved? (e.g., are the culvert elevations under the tsouthern entrance set to minimize additional impacts?) Impacts to areas 12 will not alter the hydrology of the adjacent wetlands. The large diameter ' culvert under this portion of the access will be set at the existing elevation of the channel of this swale wetland. ' Impacts to areas 13 will not alter the hydrology of the adjacent wetlands. The large diameter culvert under this portion of the access will be set at the existing elevation of the channel of Bluff Creek. 1 1 1 1 Impacts to areas 14 and 15 will not alter the hydrology of the remaining swale portion of Wetland 1. This wetland is formed in a swale and hydrology from the stormwater ponds, existing wetland 2, and the wetland restoration area M4 will flow from through the mitigation/stormwater system from restoration area M4 to the existing swale of Wetland 1 by means of culverts. The culverts will be set at elevations of 941 msl from M4 to the stormwater pond system, at 922 msl from the stormwater pond to the existing swale wetland are of Wetland 1 at the existing wetland swale elevation. Hydrology to wetland 2 and Mitigation area M3 will be supplied, as it currently is, by surflcial flow adjacent Lyman Boulevard and the new access to the school. Wetland impact 15 is to the side slope of Lyman Boulevard and will not affect hydrology of wetland 3, the restoration and mitigation area M4. ' Mr. Don Asleson ' Pinnacle Project Number: MN07038.00 March 7, 2007 Page 3 of 5 ' • Has the existing substrate in the mitigation areas been determined to be suitable for 1 wetland mitigation? If soils are found that are not adequate for wetland mitigation (loamy clay or tighter) what soil amendments will be made? ' No soil borings have been conducted to determine the characteristics of the soils underlying the mitigation areas MI, M2, M3, M5, and M6. However, soil probes conducted during the wetland delineation in the areas of the proposed mitigation concurred with the soil survey that ' the underlying soils consist of loamy clays. The decision to place organic top soil into the excavated wetland basins is to provide a suitable matrix for wetland vegetation. Vegetation of the existing adjacent wetlands (sedges and reed canary grass) will be at the same elevation as the ' proposed elevation for the mitigation areas. The mitigation areas MI, M2, M3, M5, and M6 are planned to match the existing elevations of the adjacent wetlands. This will place the mitigation area at the same elevations of the sedges and grasses, above the cattails of the adjacent lower wetlands. • Are organics necessary in the mitigation area? Do natives need this additional soil amendment? According to the Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey the soils in mitigation ' areas M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 consist of sloping Lester -Kilkenny soils. Lester -Kilkenny soils are typically underlain by a clayey loam. Excavation of the Lester - Kilkenny soils will expose the yellowish clayey loam, which is unsuitable as a matrix for vegetative growth. After the mitigation basins have been rough graded, the contractor will be able to determine if organic top soil is needed. If needed, placement of native organic top soil 1 from the Site will ensure a suitable matrix for plant growth. • What are the proposed cross sections for all 5 mitigation areas? Area 1 is provided in the application, please provide the other 5 cross -sections. Or if any are similar to area 1, indicate which basins. ' Mitigation areas MI, M2, M5, and M6 are similar in construction methods, slight excavation to match the adjacent existing wetland area. The cross section of M1 is typical for all mitigation ' areas except M3 and M4. Cross section figures of the mitigation areas M3 and M4 are provided. • What is proposed to avoid or remove compaction and enhance seeding germination within the mitigation areas prior to seeding? ' The Seeding Plan (Appendix D) in the wetland permit application utilizes the MN/DOT Draft Seeding Manual and the Guidelines for Restoring and Managing Native Wetland Vegetation. The MN/DOT seeding manual specifies site preparation, seed installation, seeding rates, 1 ' Mr. Don Asleson ' Pinnacle Project Number: MN07038.00 March 7, 2007 Page 4 of 5 ' harrowing, packing and mulch. These specifications indicate loosing of top soil prior to seeding if the broadcast or hydro seeding method is utilized. The seeding method will be determined by the contractors at the time of the seeding. The seeding ' and planting plan allows the contractor the flexibility to determine the best method for seeding after the contractor assesses the mitigation construction, equipment requirements, soil types, and seasonal visibilities. ' Do you have a seeding diagram for the basins? Please include a copy in the wetland mitigation plan to ensure that the basins are planted appropriately. 1 A figure defining basin M4 is provided. ' Please identify the invasives (including cattail) that need to be managed within the maintenance plan. A management plan for eradicating large infestations should be ' included in the maintenance plan along with instructions for using Rodeo or similar MN DNR approved herbicide near water bodies. t t t 1 A Maintenance Plan for the mitigation and restoration is included. Page 2: BWSR Seed Mixture W4, which is proposed for one of the restored wetlands may not be acceptable, since many of the species provided in this mixture would likely not survive the proposed Type 2/3 hydrology. BWSR Seed Mixture W1 and W2 should be utilized within each Type 2/3 replacement wetland. This wetland seed mixture was suggested for the right-of-way ditch in mitigation area M4. The Seeding Plan (Appendix A) recommended BWSR Seed Mixture W2 for the type 2 mitigation areas and BWSR Seed Mixture U6 for the upland buffer, prairie area. Page 5: "Large and/or fluffy seeds should be buried approximately 1/4inch deep." Native wetland seed buried by less than 'Ainch of soil may reduce germination by approximately 90 percent. Broadcasting in the wetland, with minimal or no raking is recommended for the wetland basins. Hydoseeding within wetland basins is also acceptable and may allow the applicator to seed areas that may not support equipment. recommends placement of light dependant seed on top of the soils and lightly raking it in. It does not recommend the drill seeding method for wetland basins. Broadcast seeding or hydro seeding is recommended for the wetland mitigation areas, with drop seeding or drill seeding recommended for the upland buffer areas. 11 ' Mr. Don Asleson ' Pinnacle Project Number: MN07038.00 March 7, 2007 Page 5 of 5 i I The seeding method will be determined by the contractors at the time of the seeding in accordance with this guidance document. The seeding and planting plan allows the contractor the flexibility to determine the best method far seeding after the contractor assesses the mitigation construction, equipment requirements, soil types, and seasonal visibilities. Page 6 -11: 'Fertilize within the replacement wetland areas.' Fertilizers are not recommended in wetland basins and are rarely required in native upland buffer areas, unless soils area found to be low in nutrients. No fertilizers will be utilized in the seeding plan. Page 8 -11: 'The site should be packed after racking.' It is recommended that the seeded area remain "rough". The wetland permit application recommends the mitigation basins be rough graded, then covered with top soil. The wetland basins will remain in "rough" conditions. Page 8, 9, and 11: 'Mulch the site with 2.0 tons per acre.' A mulching rate of 1.0 ton per acre for the wetland replacement area (wetland and upland buffer) is recommended, followed by crimping. The MN/DOT Seeding Manual 2000 recommends a 2.0 tons per acre mulching rate, while the t Guidelines for Restoring & Managing Native Wetland Vegetation recommends a 1.0 ton mulching rate. We concur that the 1.0 ton mulching rate is preferred. The applicant and t contractor should follow the Guidelines for Restoring & Managing Native Wetland Vegetation recommendations for mulching at a 1.0 ton per acre mulching rate. If you have any questions concerning this addendum or wish to discuss any particular aspect of the project, please contact Mike Hultgren or me at (763) 315-4501. ' Sincerely, ' PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. �e *-Ji ' 4�& Scott Thelen Project Manager - Natural Resources Attachments i. • 1 - l Ar,bUretum'�Blvd Charih A f*atlV .t _d r1rr1 .t ,fi. 1 i.r y I Lyma noB lvd JL �k_ i 1t i f i i »� i ---- ,-' •.926 ______________— Proposed rode _____________—__ ___ .__. om ih hon a ✓Engineering AMEngineering 11541 95th Avenue North MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 (763) 315-4501 FIGURE Mitigation Area M3 New High School Chanhassen, 9 b — Cross Section — Chanhassen Minnesota PREPARED BY: SAT °2 28/07 Scale: Not to Scale 4L IL A A' ------------------------ PmM aer.I MIiN+Irn Piry ca a�-a EwLn6 h'elLn{MOM,11on Nei ' P n Pinnacle ✓Engineering FIGURE 9c Mitigation/Restoration Area M4 — Cross Section PREPARED BY: SAT °2/28/07 11541 95th Avenue North ��� New High Chanhassen, School — Chanhassen Minnesota Scale: MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 (763) 315-4501 Not to Scale I I I 1 1 Wetland and Upland Maintenance Plan New High School - Chanhassen Mitigation/Restoration Area The wetland and upland buffer created for mitigation/restoration will require regular management to become established and dominated by native and noninvasive vegetation as required by the Wetland Conservation Act. This is critical in the first three to five years and should be recognized as integral to the wetland mitigation success. Management will include both eliminating non-native and invasive vegetation along with creating ideal conditions for native plants to flourish. ' Some invasive plants are strong competitors and without management, could hamper establishment of the native planting. Invasive wetland species such as purple loosestrife, reed canary grass, and cattail exist in many urban wetlands, and may ' contribute seed to the restored area. Invasive species such as common buckthorn, yellow and white sweet clover, spotted knap-weed, and Canada thistle are of concern in upland areas. 1 1 1 1 H 1 Non-native plant removal/management and careful monitoring is vital during the early stages of the restoration. As native plants slowly grow and spread over the years, and as thatch builds, the site will become less vulnerable to non-native and invasive species. Without non-native and invasive plant removal/management it is highly unlikely that a diverse native plant community will become established. Methods for Invasive/Non-native Species Control 1) Mowing During the first two years of plant establishment mowing at a height of 6 to 10 inches where feasible, during the growing season, will reduce competition from annual weeds. Mowing allows light to reach the small native seedlings and reduces competition from weeds for water and soil nutrients. 2) Spot application of herbicide Individual invasive plants (including cattail) can be eradicated through wick application or spraying of herbicide. Rode6rm or other Minnesota Department of Natural Resources herbicides approved for use near /in water bodies should be applied by a licensed applicator at the appropriate times to control individual plants. 3) Eradicate large infestations with herbicide The most effective method of eradicating large colonies of plants is to wick -apply or spray them with herbicide. Use Rodeo when spray may come in contact with water and Roundup in upland situations. Repeated application will probably be necessary. Apply to green, actively growing foliage. Herbicides can effectively control herbaceous non-native vegetation when applied in spring or fall. Take great care not to apply herbicide to surrounding native plants. A very small amount of herbicide can kill a plant. 4) Cut woody stems and apply herbicide to wound All undesirable woody plants, greater than 1/4-inch in diameter, which cannot be hand -pulled should be cut down to expose the vascular tissue, or cambium. Herbicide painted on the cambium will be transported within the plant, eventually killing it. Cut the woody plant at a height that ensures the native herbaceous plants will not have contact with the stump and herbicide. This procedure should not be conducted while woody plants are dormant. Vegetation Maintenance Schedule 1) Year 1 After planting, annual weeds should be mowed (before seed set) to a height of six to ten inches or removed as needed. The site will likely require one to two mowings. Spot herbicide application, or hand removal, of aggressive weeds such as reed canary grass and thistle should also occur when the management crew is at the site to mow. Also, at the beginning of the maintenance period any undesirable shrubs in the mitigation areas should be sprayed with an appropriate herbicide. July (middle)- Mow wetland (where feasible) at a height of six to ten inches. Spot spray aggressive invasive and non-native species. September (early)- Mow wetland at a height of six to ten inches, spot spray invasive species. Buckthorn is best treated with herbicide in the fall when the plants are storing energy. Buckthorns lose their leaves later in the season than native woody plants, which allows for easier buckthorn identification and herbicide treatment in late September through early November. 2) Year 2 Conduct an initial site visit in May to evaluate status of restoration and determine management tasks for the year. These will likely include: Spring - Conduct burn approximately every third year starting the second or third year. May - Spot spray invasive species. Mow wetland at a height of six to ten inches (mowing may not be needed or may not be possible depending on wetness and condition). Re -seed areas that do not meet the performance standards. July - Mow prairie at a height of six to ten inches, spot spray invasive species. September - Spot spray invasive species. 3) Year 3 Conduct an initial site visit in May with to evaluate status of restoration and determine management tasks for the year. These will likely include: May - Spot spray invasive species. Re -seed areas that do not meet the performance standards stated below. I 1 1 1 I 1 June/July - Spot spray invasive species. September - Spot spray invasive species. 4) Year 4 and beyond Inspect wetland annually to assess its condition. Conduct spring or fall burn in year 5 and then approximately every third year thereafter (fall burns tend to increase forb diversity while spring burns tend to increase grass density). May -September - Apply herbicide to invasive species that are not controlled by burning. This should be required only once per year. i .e �f. �= • '`rwlt�� tip, f J�zi SSSApe�11� r" view North of science wing from bus access road N-1 p1: rs: Ai SCANNED i "WHO RINI 1A view West of main entrance at dawn -Iry wilt NEW HIGH SCHOOL mew view east across wetlands from community path T FOR AREAS SHOWN Pole Luminaires orr 2 2 2 2 4-' 12 I LDck M Ai-A2 A3-A4 Bi-B2 63-134 CI-C2 D1_-02 WE _ c, cvAflM 70' - 60' 70' 60 70' -TOTALB Man 70' 60, 1YPE 1500W MZ 1500W MZ 1500W MZ 150OW MZ 150oW MZ PIXE 5 3 9 4 4 58 N�8 .ORM 5 3 9 4 4 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 60' 70' Q.17 Q.17 Q10 0.18 Q]6 Q.19 Q.37Q.37,p3 Q.19 Q.3o Q.19 0.300.30 Q.19 Q.30 Q.27 P,20 Q z3 Q.21 p20 Q.29 Q 21 4P.36 Cif D� 021 QasQ Q.W Q-M p22 Q.23 Q 23 Q.21 Q.19 Q.26 Q.16 p.0 431 D2 Q.14 B461 Pa Q.1s 0M �1s p 42 5 p 43 Q.15 p.15 A C2 Qeo 036 4114 Q.30 4,13 Q.12 Q.25 ++ B3 p21 .09 A3 B2 Q.16 4).67 A2 Q,14 jt m Q.12 Q.05 410 y aSQAQM 4LW 4.10 Q.18 0-fa.Q-16 4.17 µto MUSCM GREEN GENERATION LIGHTING" GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE 150' Spill Chanhassen High School Baseball Softball Chanhassen, MN 150' Spill Grid Spacing = 30.0' Values given at 3.0' above grade Luminaire Type: Green Generation Rated Lamp Life: 5000 hours HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Entire Grid No. of Target Points: 97 Average: 0.225 Maximum: 0.51 Minimum: 0.05 Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 1.000 Number of Luminaires: 58 Avg KW over 5000 hours: 90.71 Max KW: 98.6 Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANT ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the rated life of the lamp. Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/_10% in accordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individual measurements may vary from computer predictions. Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chan and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume+/- 3 % nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1 m) of design locations. By: Nathan Chizek SCALE IN FEET 1 :150 Pole acati File #: 131090prodr4 Date: 22-Aug-08 l(¢dimensionsare relative to 0,0 referrenceencepoint(s) ® Not to be reproduced in wholeor part without the written o. 150' aab' consent of Musco Lighting. 0798981, 2008 Musco Lighting Print Date (221Aug/2008) 8 Time (11:56) Pole Luminaires Orr Eoulgx SUE Qu,rc eEVAnON WOUPOW near '"'p TYPE mE mo Q1:Q 2 Al-A2 70' - 70' 150OW MZ 5 5 0 2 A3-A4 60, - 60 1500W MZ 3 3 0 2 31-62 70' - 70' 150OW MZ 9 9 0 2 33-B4 60' - 60' 1500W MZ 4 4 0 4 CI-C2 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 4 4 0 D1-02 12 TOTALS 58 58 0 d 2,1 .125 .138 }28 V1 j.31 J.64,1.82 ,116sJ]n J.30 J ]n J� Je] 63 J 30 J J.59 J 31 J.54J.3B J.34 J ze .1.57 J33 0.24 Q1 D1 J.37 Q.97 J.W J.17 J.26 .135 J.41 0.49 ,pits Q.81 0.67 'Pas pm D2 Jes 0.e8 B49 1 21 103 0.91 222 Om 1.42 Q.x 1.66 QB5 p� C2 1.38 p 85 1.18 Q im J.so p91 Jfi5 'p" B3 J.an 0.72 A3 B2 112 p,B1 A2 J.m pW 0,97 p b Q.89 0.47 0.52. 0.59 0.65 0.70 QJB QJ9 182 0.90 Q.93 186 0.78 Q.78 0.95 4.1111 J28 JAB J.70.1.01.13 2.05 4.93 J.M J.73 J.58 J.44 J.30 J.16.1 3.1A 40.86 Musco. GREEN GENERATION LIGHTING" GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE 150' Spill Chanhassen High School Baseball Softball Chanhassen, MN 130' Spill Grid Spacing = 30.0' Values given at 3.0' above grade Luminaire Type: Green Generation Rated Lamp Life: 5000 hours MAX VERTICAL FOOTCANDLES Entire Grid No. of Target Points: 97 Average: 1.282 Maximum: 2.46 Minimum: 0.46 Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 1.coo Number of Luminaires: 58 Avg ON over 5000 hours: 90. 71 Max KW: 98.6 Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANT ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the rated life of the lamp. Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% in accordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individual measurements may vary from computer predictions. Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3 % nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1 m) of design locations. By: Nathan Chizek SCALE IN FEET 1 : 150 File #: 131090prodr4 Date: 22-Aug-08 Pole location(s) ¢dimensions are relative N to 0,0 reference point(s) 0 Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written V 150' 300' consent of Musco Lighting. 01981, 2008 Musco Lighting Print Date (22/Aug/2008) 6 Time (11:56) C1 D1 B3 FOR C2 0000 Musco, GREEN GENERATION LIGHTING" GUARANTEED Chanhassen Nigh School Baseball Softball Chanhassen, MN INCLUDES: Baseball Softball Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summ for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3 nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1 m) of design locations. Pole Luminaires elY LOGiION 91E � FI NAM M01i HEI'M LtaY M ch" POLE 2 Al-A2 ]0' - 70' 150OW MZ 5 2 60, - 60' 150OW MZ i 3 2 _A3-A4 B1-82 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 9 2 33-64 60' - 60' 1500W MZ 4 4 Cl-C2 70' - 70' i 150OW MZ 4 D1-D2 12 TOTALS 58 SINGLE LUMINAIRE AMPERAGE DRAW CHART Ballast Specifications .90 min power mcm, I Line Amperage Per Luminaire u4... Single Phase Voltage 120 teot 208 teat 220 teol 240 277 347 tWl 1i) 1-1 380 1-1 415 (W) 80 Ieol 1500 watt MZ 115.018.6 17.7 17.5 1 6.5 15.1143 1 - 13.7 By: Nathan Chizek SCALE IN FEET 1 : 120 Pole ns are relative File #: 131090prodr4 Date: 22-Aug-08 N to 0,o rreferenceferenc.8dimensie points) �oNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written a• 120' 240' consent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2008 Musco Lighting Print Date (22/Aug/2008) & Time (11:56) IESNA RP-6-01 Recommended illuminance levels are: Class 111- Shooting Line — Horizontal illuminance: 100 lux (10 fc) Target 0 18.3 meters (60 feet) — Vertical illuminance: 300 lux (30 fc) Target ® 91.5 meters (300 feet) — Vertical illuminance: 500 lux (50 fc) CV = 0.21 or less. (E ,JE. = 2.5:1) Class IV - Shooting Line - Horizontal illuminance: 100 lux (10 fc.) Target @ 18.3 meters (60 feet) — Vertical (luminance: 200 lux (20 fc) Target @ 91.5 meters (300 feet) —Vertical illuminance: 300 lux (30 fc) CV = 0.25 or less. (E� JET = 3:1 or less) Horizontal illuminance readings should be taken at a 1-meter (3-foot) elevation; vertical illuminance readings should be taken at the target center. 6.4.2 Design Considerations. Poles should be located a minimum of 1.5 meters (5 feet) behind the shooting line and 4.6 meters (15 feet) above ground. A narrow beam floodlight should be aimed at the target to provide the required vertical illuminance. Auxiliary poles utilizing down range aiming may be located closer to the target to maximize the beam utilization and minimize the spill light. An ambient illuminance between 30 to 50 lux (3 to 5 fc) is recommended for the surfaces around the target to soften the luminance contrast between the target and its surround. 6.5 Baseball Baseball is a high speed multi -directional aerial sport. Proper illuminance levels and light direction are critical as the ball may travel over 219 kilometers per hour (136 miles per hour). In flight, the white ball may be momentarily lost from sight 9 there is erect glare from light sources or if it is viewed against a high reflectance background that produces low contrast. Proper pole location and floodlight aiming are essential for good player and spectator visibility. To this end a recommended layout is provided in Figure 53. Wce 'r6 ft) Figure 53. For this baseball stadium layout, each shaded area indicates a critical glare zone where luminaires should not be located. m W IESNA RP-6-01 Baseball infield dimensions are standard while outfield dimensions/area vary. Field dimensions include a 4.6-meter (15-foot) foul zone strip. It is considered part of the playing area and should be addressed in the lighting design (See Figure 54). Major and minor league baseball fields extend the distance in the foul zone to the seating area. This foul zone may be narrowed gradually toward the outfield. The illuminated field may also include space for bull pens, dugouts, and warm up areas. .� PP DEFINE ARFA [ . . . . . . . . . . . 1: j � MEASURING POINT PONY LEAGUE BASELINES 22A6 M 9.14 M x 9.14 M (75) AND ABOVE SHOULD HAVE (30' x 30') THE SAME MEASURING POINTS AS BASEBALL Figure 54. Grid of Illuminance test points on baseball field(s). Each measuring point represents light In the surrounding area Mock (the shaded square Is an example). 6.5.1 Illuminance Criteria. (For minor league professional ballfieid lighting requirements consult Professional Baseball Association [PBA) Standards.) Recommended illuminance levels are: Class I — Horizontal illuminance: Infield 1500 lux (150 fc) CV = 0.07 or less. (E.JEm = 1.3:1 or less) Outfield 1000 lux (100 fc) CV = 0.13 or less. (E,. /E,,, = 1.7:1 or less) Class /I — Horizontal illuminance: Infield 1000 lux (100 fc) CV = 0.10 or less. (E.JE. =1.5:1 or less) Outfield 700 lux (70 fc) CV = 0.17 or less. (E../E. = 2:1 or less) Class I/I— Horizontal illuminarm: Infield 500 lux (50 fc) CV = 0.17 or less. (E../E,,. = 2:1 or less) Outfield 300 lux (30 fc) CV = 0.21 or less. (E,,,,,/ER = 2.5:1 or less) IESNA RP-6-01 Class IV— Horizontal illuminance: Infield 300 lux (30 fc) CV = 0.21 or less. (E„JE,w, = 2.5:1 or less) Outfield 200 lux (20 fc) CV = 0.25 or less. (E,,,,JE. = 3:1 or less) Illuminance readings should be taken at a 1-meter (3-foot) elevation. 6.5.2 Design Considerations. Significant variables must be accounted for in the design process, including light from multiple directions, floodlight locations, glare control, luminaire banks, luminaire beam spread, and mounting height: • tight from Multiple Directions - The lighting should minimize shadows and provide good modeling of the play- ers. This usually requires that light come from three or four directions. • Floodlight Locations - Floodlight locations should coincide with the way the game is played. Figure 53 stows pole locations producing good visibility that also minimize glare for the players. In addition, common locations for the "A;"'B" and "C" poles are shown. Combination fields often restrict the outfield pole locations. Under these conditions it may be necessary to install outfield poles at the end of the first and third base foul zones. This usually requires particularly -high lumi- naire mounting. • Glare Control -The best glare reduction method keeps the floodlights out of the players normal line of sight. A step-by-step analysis of the way baseball is played is necessary. In Figure 53 the triangular areas extend- ing from each infield base form a zone 20 degrees wide. If the floodlights are located outside these triangular areas, the ball (as seen by the players) will not move through the floodlight bank. This arrangement also min- imizes direct glare for the infielders. A glare zone has not been defined from third base to first base (and from first base to third base). Throws along these directions are usually at a low angle well below the floodlights. • Luminalre Banks- When luminaires are arranged in banks, care must be taken to ensure there are no aiming interferences (side to side or above and below). Individual luminaires within the banks should be placed where they are best matched to their aiming points from the pole (i.e., beams aimed in order from the nearest to the furthest target area will not cross each other). • Luminaire Beam Spread - Each floodlight should be selected so its beam spread puts the maximum amount of light on the field without producing a hot spot. The top of the defined beam of all luminaires should be at least 10 degrees below the plane of the floodlight. Occasionally it is necessary to have aiming angles and beam spread combinations that produce less than the 10-degree limit on the upper beam angle. Under these circumstances no more than five percent of all luminaires shall have their upper defined beam less than 10 degrees below the luminaire plane. The beam should be wide enough to overlap the beam from adjacent aim- ing points. The probability of hot spots will be reduced if the maximum beam candlepower of a single luminaire produces no more than 80 percent of the average illuminance level at any point. • Mountng Height - The minimum mounting height to the bottom row of luminaires for all poles is 21.3 meters (70 feet). Increased mounting height can compensate for additional rows of luminaires. Mounting height should also be increased (when necessary) so the top of the defined beam remains 10 degrees or more below the luminaire plane (see Figure 16 in Section 2.4). Figure 2 in the color insert shows an example of a baseball lighting system. Technical Bulletin Design Elements of Spill Light and Glare Control I. Introduction H. Why are aiming angles important? III. Why is photometry of the facture important? IV. Summary of Light -Structure Greenn" features that control spill tight and glare I. Introduction # TB0015 Purpose: Spill light and glare are a nuisance for nearby neighbors and the community. This bulletin discusses ways to limit spill light and glare. Scope: The scope of this bulletin is limited to fighting design. There are other things a property owner can do to limit spill and glare. For example: build fences or plant bushes or trees. Spill light illuminates areas off the field of play, which can be a nuisance for nearby neighbors. Glare is the discomfort experienced when looking directly at a light source. The design elements that affect offsite spill light and glare are basically the same, so this discussion is relevant for both. The two primary design elements that control spill light and glare are the fixture aiming angle and fixture photometry. Both elements need to be coordinated within the design to properly control offilite spill fight and glare. In addition to preventing fight trespass on neighboring properties, another benefit of controlling spill fight is that fewer fixtures and less electrical power may be required to light a field, since less fight is wasted See Technical Bulletin # TB0005 for a more detailed explanation of spill fight and glare. II. Why are aiming angles important? The vertical aiming angle is a key element in controlling the amount of light that is directed onto the field, with steeper aiming angles generally directing more light onto the field resulting in less spill and glare off -site. The two factors that determine the vertical aiming angle are fixture mounting height and pole setback, assuming a fixed aiming point. Below are examples showing how mounting height and setback affect aiming angles. A. Fixture Mounting Height Mounting height is typically the factor that is most easily adjusted in a fighting design, since pole locations are frequently subject to various constraints. The higher the mounting height, the WISW 800 825 6030 www.musco.com email: Iighting@musco.com © 2001. 2003 Musm Lighting Page 1 of 3 ro� vt steeper the vertical aiming angle. The steeper the aiming angle, the less spill light and glare that result. The effect of mounting height on spill and glare can be seen in the example below. Example #1: A single NEMA 4M 150OW Light -Structure Green fixture is aimed to the center of a soccer field. The only difference in this example is the mounting height; all other parameters (aiming point, pole setback, fixture type, field size, etc.) remain the same. In the illustration, the edges of the light beam represent the rays at which the beam's intensity is 10% of the maximum candlepower. �m rcm�n >+s.0 (�)ra�mu ixm (auum�ma�axrm As shown in example #1, the taller mounting height produces a steeper aiming angle which distributes more light from the fixture onto the field, thereby decreasing the spill light and glare for the nearby house. B. Pole Setback The closer the setback, or closer the pole is to the edge of the field, the steeper the vertical aiming angle. The steeper the aiming angle, the less spill light and glare that result. The effect of different setbacks can be seen in the example below. Example #2: A single NEMA 4M 150OW LSG fixture aimed to the center of a soccer field. The only difference in the example is the setback of the poles; all other parameters (aiming point, mounting height, fixture type, field size, etc.) remain the same. �6f10 N (ISi1446 I<Y mZT TO 1� 16Y��i�R�16� 116C �tl1�)!IW ➢E Wt�'ll[TO As seen above in example #2, the pole with the closer setback produces a steeper aiming angle which directs more light from the fixture onto the field, thereby decreasing the spill light and glare for the nearby house. # TBOO15 Page 2 of 3 Decreasing the setback can create shadows on the field of play and when too close can cause a hazard for players. When considering decreasing pole setback, the fighting designer will evaluate on -field lighting and safety along with off -site spill and glare concerns. III. Why is photometry of the fixture important? Fixture photometry defines the light distribution characteristics of a fixture, essentially describing the shape and intensity of the beam. Since photometric characteristics differ between fixtures, selecting a fixture with appropriate beam control is very important. IV. Summary of Light -Structure Green features that control spill light and glare • Reflector System — Hundreds of photometric patterns in their proper application provide minimal spill light for each project • Visor System — Multiple visor choices provide efficient light on the field and minimal spill light • Side Shift Beam Control — Beams can be adjusted within the luminaire horizontally and vertically, enabling the lighting designer to custom fit tight to the field. • Die -Cast Housing — Protects the optics of the system from damage ensuring photometric performance throughout the life of the system. • Factory Aiming of the fixture to the tenth of a degree ensuring fight is placed where it is intended. The purpose of this dwument is to provide an educational reference for specific technical issues that affect the quality and performance of a sports lighting system. Prepared by Chad Mcspaddm Draft date: July 31, 2001 Released: May 23, 2002 Revised: Nick Tippett, 10/25/07 Muaco products referenced or shown are protected by one or more of dha following detente. U.S. Patents: 4712167; 4811181; 4994718; 5012398; 5075828; 5134557; 5161883; 5207747: 5211473; 5229681; 5313378; 5337221; 5343374: 5377611; 5398478; 5402327; 5423281: 5426577; 5519590; 5595440; 5600537; 5636024; 5647661; 5707142; SIN387: 5800048; 5816691; 5856721; 5860733; 5687969: 5906425: 5944413; 6016389; 6036338; 6203176; 6220726; 6250596; 6340790; 6398392: 6446408; 64641%; 6676277; 6681110; 6692142; 6833675; 6929385; 69690:N; 6988697; 715 72: 7059745; 7171793; 1116635; 7209958: 7216437; 7246782; D337168; D353797; 10353911; D411D96. 7watralia Patents: 67(1062; 705971; 708912; 780583; 764165: 2002251908. Brand Pa1ents: P53057245; P196071745. Canada Patents: 89366; 2009749; 2026850: 2027033; 2035014; 2058261; 2060585; 2087054; 2103874; 2110014: 2200511; 2200515; 2204958; 2210226; 2217872; 2378279; 2378283: 2378318: 2407922; 2407924. China Patents: R96192709.7: R30139426.7. EPC Patents: 440531; 804704; 821776; 1192793; 000376496+)002. From Patents: 440531. Germany Patent 440531, Greece Patent 3032360. Hungary Patent 21&%1. teMrM patents: 804704; 821778; 1192793. Italy Patent 804704 Japer Patents: 3270932; 3651006; 3740551. Mewoo Patents: 175863; 183225; 196837; 241985. New Zealand Patents: 246820; 301212; 307705; 333806. Norway Patent DESIGNREG.NR: 79633. Russia Patent: 61"0. Soudb Korea Patents: 292548; 405147; 405754; 561799. Spain Patent N 1. Sn Lanka Patent 13133. Taiwan Patent 1263753. Vietnam Patent 9692. Other patents pending. # TBOO15 Page 3 of 3 EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWN Pole Luminaires elY LMAIMxi aII S&AIa Saw 1YPE POLE am sees. 2 Al-A2 60' - 60' 1500W MZ 5 5 0 2 31-82 so' .� - — 60' ,50OW MZ 9 9 I 0- 4 Cl-c2 60' - 60' 150OW MZ 4 4 0 DI-D2 8 TOTALS 44 144 0 1. SCALE IN FEET 1 : 80 N 01 ao fi1—.l Cl 197_D1 / 27 31 34 ,28 29 30 32 29 27 30 29 30 27 25 25 26 28 ,28 ,24 30 30 .28 .28 ,27 ,24 26 26 25 30 29 31 39 38 34 30 ,27 ,26 ,26 .27 28 30 32 53 .47 38 33 28 25 .24 26 26 ,27 31 56 51 .42 35 29 25 25 26 25 33 25 -------- ___-_--__----_-------___--� 55 53 .45 39 33i 29 28 28 28 30 31 55 54 .48 .40 37 34 32 32 35 3411 56 56 5148 ]43 46 .42 37 32 33 31 52 5656 56 ! .55 50 .40 34 33 28 +46 53 55 54 52 ! 53 +49 35 30 29 _1707"M B2 so' D2 fim C2 Te `/`/`/`/ muscoe GREEN GOERM11ON UGffrl - GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE Baseball Chanhassen High School Baseball Softball Chanhassen, MN Baseball Size: Irregular Grid Spacing = 30.0' x 30.0' Values given at 3.0' above grade Lumineire Type: Green Generation Rated Lamp Life: 5000 hours Avg Lumens/Lamp: 134,000 CONSTANT ILLUMINATION HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Infield Outfield No. of Target Points: 25 96 Average: 50.4 31.7 Maximum: 56 56 Minimum: 33 22 Avg/Min: 1.53 1.42 Max/Min: 1.71 2.51 UG (Adjacent Pts): 1.21 1.38 CV: 0.13 0.24 Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 1,000 Number of Luminaires: 44 Avg KW over 5000 hours: 68.82 Max KW: 74.8 Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANT ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the rated life of the lamp. Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10 % in accordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individual measurements may vary from computer predictions. Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume+/- 3 k nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1 m) of design locations. By: Nathan Chizek File#: 131090prodr3 Date: 22-Aug-08 Pole location(s) +dimensions are relative 01 to 0,0 reference points) Pd Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written 160' consent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2008 Musco Lighting Print Date (22/Aug/2008) 8 Time it 1:27) UIPMENT Pole LIPT FOR AREAS SHOWN Luminaires lY LOGIIIXI I BGE i9.EVAIWN Mar 111E PM al0 WX 2 i A3-A4 60' 60' 1500W MZ 3 3 0 2 B3-84 60' - 60' 150OW MZ 4 4 0 4 TOTALS 14 14 I 0 ,29 30 0 .r B4 /z2 31 35 t37 ,37 25 ,21 30 34 36 37 33 22 21 28 33 36 37 38 321 22 22 28 31 34 37 39 .40 37 28 28 31 34 36 [-38 11 .44 .46 39 32 33 34 37 Bo .47 52 54 .18 27 34 34 36 381 .141 52 56 581 53 28 35 31 30 361 .461 54 58 601 jig oi�; 24 21 22 27 39 48 53 52 51 B3,�------------------------ ------- ------------- ------------------------- -- A3 �. ®SCALE IN FEET 1 : 50 N 0' 50' too, AI4 Iu C J D0 muscoe GREEN GENERATION UGNnW GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE Softball Chanhassen High School Baseball Softball Chanhassen, MN Softball Size: 18071807180' - 60' Basepath Grid Spacing = 20.0' x 20.0' Values given at 3.0' above grade Luminaire Type: Green Generation Rated Lamp Life: 5000 hours HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Infield Outfield No. of Target Points: 25 56 Average: 50.3 31.0 Maximum: 62 40 Minimum: 38 21 Avg/Min: 1.31 1.48 Max/Min: 1.62 1.91 UG (Adjacent Pis): 1.25 1.50 CV: 0.15 0.18 Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 1.000 Number of Luminaires: 14 Avg KW over 5000 hours: 21.9 Max KW: 23.8 Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANT ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the rated life of the lamp. Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% in accordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individual measurements may vary from computer predictions. Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume+/- 3% nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1 m) of design locations. By: Nathan Chizek File p: 131090prodr3 Date: 22-Aug-08 Pole location(s) +dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference points) ® Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Lighting. 01981, 2008 Musco Lighting Print Date (22/Augt2008) 8 Time (11:27) T FOR AREAS SHOWN Pole Luminaires MY L=11121 ,a W. 1500W MZ 5 3 5 3 0 0_ 2 Ai-A2 60' -' A3-A4 i 60' 2 80' _ 1500W MZ 2 B1-82 60' W. 1500W MZ 9 9 0 8 S3-S4 CI-C2 D1-D2 W. - 80' 1500W MZ 4 4 0 12 -TOTALS 58 58 0 J.50 J.56 0,73 Jab J.80 J'Si J.81 J36 J.19J03 a.tt �7.00 J.es J'O 469 J.61 J.Bt J.Ss J.82 0,45 4.67 J.W J." J.4o 47.33 Cl Dl 41.43 JA3 J.52 -2 M JA5 .1.58 J.32 J.53 J.45 433 J.BB 0.16 J 0° D2 41.01 B -q 1 J91 Z�.38 � W .2B J.10 ZJB 0.07 i.)9 J.11 J.18 A C2 $.69 0.15 .1,10 Z.04 4.05 0.76 P.es B3 0.66 Pas A3 32 0.31 4J.fe 4),74 H2 pm J.os P.55 Q.97 .0.59 P.W PJ3PJB Pat P.87 y.0.1-01 J-19J.31.1.10 J.01 PA7 Pa3 JP4 JA6 JJf .7.00 Jae g M XU zli Q.16 J.92 J-s4 J.65 J.48 J.30 J.16 JP0 P.93 SCALE IN FEET 1:150 N 0' 150- 300. 0000 MUSCO4 GREEN GENERATION LIGHTING" GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE 150' Spill Chanhassen High School Baseball Softball Chanhassen, MN 150' Spill Grid Spacing = 30.0' Values given at 3.0' above grade Luminaire Type: Green Generation Rated Lamp Life: 5000 hours MAX VERTICAL FOOTCANDLES Entire Grid No. of Target Points: 97 Average: 1.510 Maximum: 2.79 Minimum: 0.58 Average Lamp Tilt Factor. 1.000 Number of Luminaires: 58 Avg KW over 5000 hours: 90.71 Max KW: 98.6 Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANT ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the rated life of the lamp. Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% in accordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individual measurements may vary from computer predictions. Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3 % nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1 m) of design locations. By: Nathan Chink File#: 131090prodr3 Date: 22-Aug-08 Pale location(s) +dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point(s) 0 Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Lighting. ©l981, 2008 Musco Lighting Print Date (22/Aug/2008) 8 Time (11:27) T FOR AREAS SHOWN Pole Luminaires 1i 60' 60' 60. 60' TYM 1500W MZ 1500W Mz 1500W MZ 1500W Mz r5 3 8 4 c 5 3 ._� 9 4 G 0 0 0 0 2 A1-A2 So' 2 A3-A4 60' 2 81-92 6P 6 83.84 C1-C2 D1-D2 so. - 12TOTALS 58 56 0 18 (p a Z2 D.20 .5Q 1 .31 p20 \yy.0,48y38 0.3a�.2Y O,21 x pz1 0` D.zsOia 0.21 pzG 4P,22 pea pis D.19 D.39 C1 D1 0.19 D.36 D.41 n +a D.19 0.1 D 15 D.1s 0.16 0.17 p.te 0.17 0.17 Dee D.15 pn4 0.12 B3 Dn6 ,p.m A2 Qzt 4P,27 p31 D2 pm 0.41 0.43 0.43 C2 0.41 O e4 pie fm O.ts D.15 0.12 D 07 Ont D.6e 0.10 0.06 407 cea.009 0.10 0.12 t).130.16 pis 0.21 D.20 0.17 0.18 020 023 029 0.36 0.43 0.50 0.53 0.50 0.45 A40 0.W 027 022 0.18 0.15 4P.120.11 P.09 SCALE IN FEET 1 : 150 (90, 150, 300' Musco. GREEN GENERATION LIGHTING" GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE ISO' Spill Chanhassen High School Baseball Softball Chanhassen, MN I Spill Grid Spacing = 30.0' Values given at 3.0' above grade Luminaire Type: Green Generation Rated Lamp Life: 5000 hours HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Entire Grid No. of Target Points: 97 Average: 0.232 Maximum: 0.53 Minimum: 0.06 Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 1.000 Number of Luminaires: 58 Avg KW over 5000 hours: 90.71 Max KW: 98.6 Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANT ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the rated life of the lamp. Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% in accordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individual measurements may vary from computer predictions. Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3% nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1 m) of design locations. By: Nathan Chizek File #: 131090prodr3 Date: 22-Aug-08 Pole location(s) +dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point(s) 0 Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Lighting. 01981, 2008 Musoo Lighting Print Date (22/Aug/2008) 8 Time (11:27) C1 D1 D2 C2 0000 Musco. GREEN GENERATION LIGHTING" GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE Chanhassen High School Baseball Softball Chanhassen, MN INCLUDES: Baseball Softball Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summ for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3% nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1 m) of design locations. Polo OR AREAS SHOWN Luminaires 0rY LOCATION s m fiONNEW 1E-- POOIE 2 Al-A2 80' 80' 1500W MZ 5 2 A3-A4 60' so. _ 1500W MZ 3 2 B1-B2 60, '.. 80' 1500W MZ 9 6 83-34 60' - 80' 1500W MZ 4 Cl-C2 DI-D2 -58 12 TOTAL$ SINGLE LUMINAIRE AMPERAGE DRAW CHART Ballast Specifications m min o or l�cter Line Amperage Per Luminaire mu 4raw Single Phase Voltage 120 leul 208 Iml 20 leol 240 277 347 24 '.77 Ir4) 380 181 415 (1 80 l�l 1500 watt MZ 115.0 By: Nathan Chizek SCALE IN FEET 1 : 120 Pole location(s) File #: 131090prodr3 Date: 22-Aug-08 dimensions are relative N®a to 0,0 referrencenc e polnt(s) ® Not toreproduced in whole or part without the written tza zoo' consent of Musco Lighting. O1981, 2008 Musco Lighting Print Date (22/Aug/2008) 8 Time (11:27) EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWN Pole n LOCAIxn aa= allLuminaires gEVA1 ManttPE Pau Gaa sett 2 Al-A2 70, - 70' 1500W MZ 5 5 0 2 31-B2 70' - 70' 150OW MZ 9 9 0 4 C1-02 70, - 70' 150OW MZ 4 4 0 D1-D2 3 TOTALS 44 44 0 sty Ct i9'-' D1 27 30 35 32 28 27 31 29 27 30 30 29 27 25 25 .28 31 32 +23 28 32 28 29 28 27 29 30 30 34 29 3' 81 33 33 32 30 29 29 31 33 34 34 32 82 39 35 31 28 28 29 31 32 31 29 +46 +46 39 35 31 29 29 29 29 33 25 51 53 __ _ 46 ___________-_T 41 361: 32 30 .30 31 32 31 i 55 56 52 68 .43 38 34 33 33 36 331 12, Al 55 59 56 54 50 44 pD 37 33 35 29 i 52 59 59 56 54! 49 43 +98 36 33 27 .46 52 54 52 .48 j +46 .42 .32 .30 28 SCALE IN FEET 1 : 80 N 176 B2 W D2 iI I�-! C2 Tz 0000 Musco. GREEN GENEUTIGN uGNTING' GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE Baseball Chanhassen High School Baseball Softball Chanhassen, MN Baseball Size: Irregular Grid Spacing = 30.0' x 30.0' Values given at 3.0' above grade Lummaire Type: Green Generation Rated Lamp Life: 5000 hours HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Infield Outfield No. of Target Points: 25 96 Average: 51.6 31.9 Maximum: 59 49 Minimum: 36 23 Avg/Min: 1.42 1.41 MaxlMin: 1.64 2.16 UG (Adjacent Pis): 1.18 1.36 CV: 0.11 0.17 Average Lamp Till Factor: 1.000 Number of Luminaires: 44 Avg KW over 5000 hours: 68.82 Max KW: 74.8 Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANT ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the rated life of the lamp. Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% in accordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individual measurements may vary from computer predictions. Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3% nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1m) of design locations. By: Nathan Chizek File#: 131090prodr4 Date: 22-Aug-08 Pole location(s) +dimensions are relative 5 to 0,0 reference point(s) Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written 160, consent of Musco Lighting. 91981, 2008 Musco Lighting Print Date (22/Aug/2008) 8 Time (11:56) F Pole Luminaires nr ioana+ sa cxeoe uouxrix .1 r 18 on",ILsvenax xuolr me M 02 Gwc 2 A3-A4 60' 60 1500W MZ 3 3 0 2 B3 64 60, - 60' 1600W MZ 4 4 0 4 TOTALS 14 14 0 10 4 B4 /lam A 30 3034 36 35 / 22 30 .33 35 37 34 24 ,21 ,29 33 35 36 37 32 24 ,22 ,28 29 32 32 33 34 34 36 37 37 .41 39 .45 37 50 ,29 $1 ,22 33 33 34 35 .40 .49 53 57 53 ,27 35 35 36 38 .44 53 57 59 56 ,28 34 33 33 381 .491 56 56 581 61 Q I 21 ,23 ,24 30 .42 52 53 5KY 0 56 B331eY_________________________ ___..__ __________________ ____ -- A3 35• SCALE IN FEET 1 : 50 N l o so 100 A4 TN C \J`/0 musco. GREEN GENERATION LIGHTING" GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE Softball Chanhassen High School Baseball Softball Chanhassen, MN Softball Size: 1807180'/180' - 60' Basepath Grid Spacing = 20.0' x 20.0' Values given at 3.0' above grade Luminaire Type: Green Generation Rated Lamp Life: 5000 hours HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Infield Outfield No. of Target Points: 25 56 Average: 51.3 31.0 Maximum: 61 39 Minimum: 37 21 Avg/Min: 1.37 1.45 MaxlMin: 1.64 1.81 UG (Adjacent Pts): 1.29 1.59 CV: 0.14 0.17 Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 1.000 Number of Luminaires: 14 Avg KW over 5000 hours: 21.9 Max KW: 23.8 Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANT ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the rated life of the lamp. Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% in accordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individual measurements may vary from computer predictions. Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3% nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1m) of design locations. By: Nathan Chizek File#: 131090prodr4 Date: 22-Aug-08 Pole loeaten(s) +dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point(s) Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2008 Musco Lighting Print Date (22/Aug/2008) 8 Time (11:56) Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M. Mattick John F. Kelly Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Samuel J. Edmunds Cynthia R. Kirchoff Marguerite M. McCarron 1380 Corporate Center Curve Suite 317 • Eagan, MN 55121 651-452-5000 Fax 651-452-5550 www.ck-law.com O­7 - O to CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Direct Dial: (651)234-6221 RECEIVED E-mailAddress: snelson@ck-l�.com .com January 17, 2008 JAN 2 2 Z003 Ms. Kim Meuwissen CITY OF CHANHASSEN City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 RE: CHANHASSEN —CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT #07-06 ➢ Wetland Alteration Permit 407-06 ➢ Conditional Use Permit #07-06 ➢ Site Plan Permit #07-06 (Part of N'% of NW '/4 of Section 22-116-23, AND Outlot B, Chanhassen Business Center, AND Part of S'/: of NW'/4 of Section 22-116-23, AND Part of SE % of NW % of Section 22-116-23, all in Carver County, Minnesota) Enclosed for the City's files please find original recorded Wetland Alteration Permit, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Permit in connection with Chanhassen High School Project #07-06. These documents were recorded with Carver County on June 6, 2007 as follows: WAP #07-06 was recorded on June 6, 2007 as Abstract Document No. A465611 and as Torrens Document No. T163180. CUP #07-06 was recorded on June 6, 2007 as Abstract Document No. A465612 and as Torrens Document No. T163181. Site Plan Permit #07-06 was recorded on June 6, 2007 as Abstract Document No. A465613 and as Torrens Document No. T163182. SRN:ms Enclosures Regards, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association P S san R. Nelson, Legallkssistant $CANNED Document No. OFFICE OF THE T 163180 REGISTRAR OF TITLES IIIIIIII IIIII III III CARVER #17 TM Flee $4 E O he # 6 00 Certified Recorded on 06-06-2007 at 02:00 ❑ AM y PM 2007-06-06 q /+\ 111111 III II II I I 11111111111111 Registrar of Hanson, Document No. OFFICE OF THE A 4 65 611 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Fee $ 46 00 Check# 17405 Certified Recorded on 06-06-2007 at 02:00 ❑ AME PM 111111111111 111111111 County Recorder CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, INIINNESOTA WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT #2007-06 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a wetland alteration permit for the following use: For the grading and filling of wetlands on the site of the Chanhassen High School, plans prepared by Pinnacle Engineering, dated February 9, 2007. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 3. Conditions. The Wetland Alteration Permit was approved subject to the following conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. All wetlands and wetland buffer areas shall be protected by silt fence during grading. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans. b. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). c. The applicant shall provide additional information as to how the vegetative communities and hydrology for Wetlands C and D will be re-established. d. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant MANNED fo shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. e. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalri. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: March 26, 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: t K.ew+, 4 ZL Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor SEAL By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) Gerhardt, City The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /4 47day ofj 20 0 7, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City 9f Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. , / s� Public DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen ""='' KAREN J. ENGELHARDT 7700 Market Boulevard � �?m P.O. Box 147ip Notary Public -Minnesota Chanhassen, MN 55317 My c ffWnWWW ogres.. (952)227-1107 ` r* , EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast comer thereof, thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest corner thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest corner of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Check # 17406 Cert.# 31519 Fee:$ 46.00 Certified Recorded on 06-06-2007 at 02:00 ❑ AM 4 PM Document NO. OFFICE OF THE A 4 65 612 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Fee:$ 46.00 Check#:17405 Certified Recorded on 06-06-2007 at 02:00 ❑ AMJ;�PM M07 06-M 465612 II II Ilil IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III Cad W. Registrar of Hanson, r TitlesII I II II IIII I II II III CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2007-06 Carl W. n n, Jr. County R der 1. Permit. Subject to the terns and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: Development within the Bluff Creek Corridor with a Variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary zone, in conformance with the grading plans prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 3. Conditions. The permit is issued for the Chanhassen High School to develop within the Bluff Creek Corridor with a Variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary zone, with the following conditions: a. The construction activities associated with the proposed project shall not conflict with the easement granted to MnDOT for its wetland mitigation project. b. To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor, the applicant shall submit a plan for the restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor (including the drainageway along the north side of the substation and the area east of the bus/event entrance) with species consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan." 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. SCANNED Dated: March 26, 2007 (SEAL) STATE OF M04NESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY7( 4 U'"I Tom Furlong, , AND:a41— D/ odd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this %D-0day ofdp�, 200-L, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. u N Y PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen P. O. Box 147 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 14-'M�� y gommleslan Ezpim Jm 31, 2010 2 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast corner thereof, thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest comet thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest corner thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest corner of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to- be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. r OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Check # 17406 Cert. # 31519 Fee: $ 46.00 Certified Recorded on 06-06-2007 at 02:00 ❑ AM qPM Document NO. OFFICE OF THE A 4 65 613 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Fee:$ 46.00 Check#:17405 Certified Recorded on 06-06-2007 at 02:00 ❑ AMoM 465613 Nllllll�nl�lilllnl��� 1111111111111111111 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT #07-06 SPECIAL PROVISIONS Carl W. FJXnsLn, Jr. County Recorder AGREEMENT dated March 26, 2007, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and Independent School District MOW No. 112, MCOfk)pWtX a Minnesota public school corporation (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A --Site Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan B--Grading & Drainage Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan C--Landscaping Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan D--Utility Plans prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan E--Electric Plan prepared by Hallberg Engineering, PC, dated 02-01-07. Plan F--Architectural Plan prepared by Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc., dated 02-02-07. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by August 1, 2009. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $5,000.00 (boulevard restoration, erosion control and landscaping). If the Developer requests a SCANNED r Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said landscaping. PROCEDURES FOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Steven Pumper Independent School District 112 11 Peavey Road Chaska, MN 55318 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. City Council approves the Site Plan with Variance for a three- story building and up lighting for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storagetmaintenance buildings and parking lots, subject to the following conditions: a. The developer shall add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas, plazas and scenic overlooks. Bicycle parking pads and storage racks shall be provided on site. b. The developer shall include angled visitor parking in the drop-off access west of the building entrance. c. The building fagade flood lights shall be permitted contingent upon meeting the intent of the lighting ordinance and subject to city review and approval. d. Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalks or trails connect. e. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by opening day of the school: • Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection. • Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for the addition of a north leg to the intersection. • Construct the following turn lanes: Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane .Approach Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North Bypass lane School Access Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North 200 feet School Access Westbound North School Access at Through lane becomes 300 feet Lyman Boulevard turn lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 100 feet Boulevard -Lyman Westbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 300 feet Build through/right Lyman Boulevard Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon 200 feet Road South Westbound Lyman Boulevard at 200 feet Audubon Road South Northbound Audubon Road South at Build to add through Lyman Boulevard lane Southbound Audubon Road South at 200 feet Build through/right Lyman Boulevard • In addition the School District shall participate in the cost of the upgrading of Lyman Boulevard on a fair and equitable basis. f. Building Official Conditions: 1) The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 2) The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3) Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls). 4) Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. g. Fire Marshal Conditions: 1) A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 2) Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 3) Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 4) Yellow curbing and "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of signs to be installed. 5) No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6) Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.4. h. Forester Conditions: 1) Increase plantings for parking lot area in order to meet ordinance requirement of 156 trees. 2) Replace Black Hills spruce seedlings with white spruce. 3) Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected. Fencing shall be installed around trees prior to grading. 4) Understory seedlings shall be located among overstory deciduous trees. 5) The applicant shall increase the quantity of seedlings planted in each grouping. 6) All deciduous seedlings shall be protected by tree tubes. Tubes shall be monitored and removed at the appropriate time. All tubes shall be fitted with protective bird netting. 7) All ash trees shall be replaced by an alternative species. 4 8) The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yard plantings along the east property line. Native shrubs and vines shall be incorporated into the landscape in addition to trees. 9) The columnar Norway maple shall be replaced with a different columnar tree such as Armstrong red maple, Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species. i. Engineer Conditions: 1) The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses to Lyman Boulevard. 2) ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska to construct the access through the substation property. 3) Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland/wetland mitigation and Lyman Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100-year event. 4) Additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future width of Lyman Boulevard will be treated in the ponds. 5) Hydrology to the wetland/wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point must be maintained. 6) The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting. 7) The development team should reexamine the proposed grades within the infield of softball field 1 to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher's mound. 8) Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner. 9) Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must be approved by the appropriate private utilities. 10) Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan. 11) The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer. 12) Pond, drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands. 13) The developer must adjust the sanitary sewer manhole elevations according to City standard detail plates. 14) The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine if the high school construction has damaged the pipe. If the City televises this sanitary sewer before the high school construction mobilized, the developer will only be required to televise the line after construction is complete. 15)The school district will be reimbursed $166,424.00 which is the cost difference between the 18-inch trunk and 10-inch lateral watermain. 16) Trunk water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued. 17) The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds. 18) Based on the proposed utility plan, an irrigation meter is required. 19) The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer, existing overhead utilities and existing gas pipelines. 20) Mylar and digital as-builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver County coordinates. j. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions: 1) Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner compliant with the project's Wetland Alteration Permit, Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). 2) The project shall comply with the conditions of its Conditional Use Permit for Development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 3) The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including all information required by the NPDES Construction Site Permit shall be located at the job trailer. 4) Stable emergency overflows shall be provided for the proposed ponds on site. The emergency overflows shall be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed. The emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re -enforcement mat or fabric and riprap. 5) The plan shall include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site. The timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow area. The rate of mulch application shall also be included on the plans (2 tons per acre, disc anchored). 6) All riprap/fabric at the flared end section shall be installed within 24 hours of flared end section installation. 0 7) Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8) Silt fence that is not placed on the contour shall have J-Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet. 9) Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas. The areas of temporary sediment basins shall be labeled on the plan. A temporary and/or permanent sediment pond shall be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared End Sections (FES) 7 and 8. This shall be installed prior to grading and then used as a temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland. If it is used as a temporary pond, it should stay in place until all turf is established. Temporary outlet structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) shall be provided for the ponds; details should be provided. 10) Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering methods from the City's project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior to conducting any and all dewatering on -site. 11) Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets. 12) The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A). 13) The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area. 14) Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 15) The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (i.e., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. k. The applicant and city staff shall look at reasonable alternative designs to reduce the impact of the retaining walls. 7 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit 'B" and incorporated herein. CITY Im Todd Gerhardt, City Manager DEVELOPER: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTIM NO. BY: C� 'Gfit Steven Pumper Its Director of Finance and Operations STATE OF MINNESOTA (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisa�day of 2001, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and fur 1 to the authority granted by its City Council. '_( , .4 h'-A— STATE OF MINNESOTA ) /� COUNTYOFIarVer (ss.) KAREN J.ENGELHARDT Notary Public -Minnesota The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this j�'day of a Peiz- 20o7by Steven Pumper, the Director of Finance and Operations of Independent School District No. 112, a Minneso ublic school corporation, as the Developer. SANDRA e. NEAL NOTARY PUALIC Notary Public DRAFTED BY: 16 AA wwoote City of Chanhassen camrtlm E w ao.r M. 1010 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter comer of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast corner thereof; thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest comer thereof Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of 91 record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest comer of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. 10 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims 11 made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on -site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmasters request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recordine. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall 12 not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions, The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. 13 14 Name and Address of Local Government Unit: City of Chanhassen — 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 — Chanhassen. MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Independent School District 112 Project Name: Chanhassen High School Application Number: 07=06 Type of Application (check one): Date of Decision: April 6, 2007 ❑ Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision ® Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision ❑ Wetland Type/Boundary Decision Check One: ❑ Approved ® Approved with conditions (see note on page 2 regarding use of wetland banking credits) ❑ Denied Summary of Project/Decision (indicate exemption number per MN Rule 8420.0122, if applicable):_ On March 27, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved a Wetland Alteration Permit for the impact of 1.69 acres of Type 2 wetland in five different basins for the purpose of creating a new high school, athletic stadium, ball fields and parking lots. The impacts will be replaced with 2.57 acres of NWC and 0.81 acres of PVC, for a total replacement of 3.38 acres of combined NWC/PVC replacement. Wetland replacement will occur in seven locations on site, two areas of which will be including PVC toward replacement credit. The following conditions were attached to the approval: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. All wetlands and wetland buffer areas shall be protected by silt fence during grading. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans. b. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). c. The applicant shall provide additional information as to how the vegetative communities and hydrology for Wetlands C and D will be re-established. d. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. ISD 112 NOD.doc -Page I of 2 9/16/04 e. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit. List of Addressees: Landowner: Steve Pumper, ISD #112 Members of Technical Evaluation Panel: Greg Graczyk, Carver SWCD Brad Wozney, BWSR Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization (If Applicable): Bob Obermeyer, RPBCWD Department of Natural Resources Regional Office (select appropriate office) DNR TEP Representative (if different than above) Kate Drewry, Area Hydrologist NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Regional Director Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE Div. Ecol. Services Div. Ecol. Services Div. Ecol. Services Bemidji, MN 56601 1201 E. Hwy. 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 Corp of Engineers Project Manager Joe Yanta Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATTN: CO-R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 Individual members of the public who requested a copy, summary only Jay Pomeroy, Anderson Johnson Associates Scott Thelen, Pinnacle Engineering You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above - referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn. R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. NOTE: Approval of Wetland Replacement Plan Applications involving the use of wetland banking credits is conditional upon withdrawal of the appropriate credits from the state wetland bank. No wetland impacts may commence until the applicant receives a copy of the fully signed and executed "Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits," signed by the BWSR wetland bank administrator certifying that the wetland bank credits have been debited. - Page 2 of 2 ISD 112 NOD.doc 9/16/04 THIS DECISION ONLYAPPLIES TO the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. LOC GOVE NT UNIT April 6, 2007 Signature Date Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator Name and Title - Page 3 of 2 ISD 112 NOD.doc 9/16/04 Pinnacle Engineering March 7, 2007 Mr. Don Asleson City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. Tel 763 315-4501 11541 95"' Avenue North Fax. 763 3154507 Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 vnvvi pineno com RE: Response to Wetland Permit Application Comments New High School - Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Pinnacle Proposal Number: MN07038.00 Dear Mr. Asleson Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. (Pinnacle), on behalf of Independent School District #112 and Anderson -Johnson and Associates, wishes to respond to the items discussed in your email of February 23, 2007 concerning the wetland permit application dated February 9, 2007. The email identified several concerns and comments. In our response, we state the concern or comments followed by additional information or clarification. What were the other sites considered for the proposed Chanhassen High School? Please include site selection as part of your sequencing discussion. A figure indicating alternative site locations is attached. Alternative Site 1 was rejected due to the non-contiguous nature of the site. ISD #112 requires the school and associated facilities to be contiguous with limited access for the safety and control issues. Alternative Site 2 was rejected due to the cost of the site, smaller acreage, potential greater wetland impacts, and inadequate Site access. • Please provide a sequencing discussion for each impacted wetland. The wetland impacts to the Site were unavoidable due to the topography of the Site. Wetland impact Il stems from balancing the soils to make a level playing field for the athletic stadium. A retaining wall will be utilized to reduce wetland impacts in this location. Wetland impacts 12 and 13 are caused by the construction of an access road from Lyman Boulevard to the school buildings. The access is needed to meet City requirements of controlled access points to alleviate traffic in the area. Safety issues and controlled access points determined the need for a third access point from Lyman Boulevard. This access point minimizes the wetland impacts in this area. Mr. Don Asleson Pinnacle Project Number: MN07038.00 March 7, 2007 Page 2 of 5 Wetland impact 14 is due to the topography of the site and need to balance and level the Site for access from Lyman Boulevard and parking. The access road was moved in an effort to minimize the wetland impact. Wetland impact I5 is due to the widening and improving of Lyman Boulevard as a result of the project. No alternative was available to the widening of Lyman Boulevard. Please provide a map similar to Figure 7 in the application to include existing wetlands boundaries. (11x17 if possible) A revised Figure 2 is provided. • Will impacting areas I2, 13,14 and I5 change hydrology to adjacent wetland basins? If not how is hydrology to be preserved? (e.g., are the culvert elevations under the southern entrance set to minimize additional impacts?) Impacts to areas 12 will not alter the hydrology of the adjacent wetlands. The large diameter culvert under this portion of the access will be set at the existing elevation of the channel of this swale wetland. Impacts to areas 13 will not alter the hydrology of the adjacent wetlands. The large diameter culvert under this portion of the access will be set at the existing elevation of the channel of Bluff Creek. Impacts to areas 14 and 15 will not alter the hydrology of the remaining swale portion of Wetland 1. This wetland is formed in a swale and hydrology from the stormwater ponds, existing wetland 2, and the wetland restoration area M4 will flow from through the mitigation/stormwater system from restoration area M4 to the existing swale of Wetland I by means of culverts. The culverts will be set at elevations of 941 msl from M4 to the stormwater pond system, at 922 msl from the stormwater pond to the existing swale wetland are of Wetland 1 at the existing wetland swale elevation. Hydrology to wetland 2 and Mitigation area M3 will be supplied, as it currently is, by surficial flow adjacent Lyman Boulevard and the new access to the school. Wetland impact 15 is to the side slope of Lyman Boulevard and will not affect hydrology of wetland 3, the restoration and mitigation area M4. Mr. Don Asleson Pinnacle Project Number: MN07038.00 March 7, 2007 Page 3 of 5 Has the existing substrate in the mitigation areas been determined to be suitable for wetland mitigation? If soils are found that are not adequate for wetland mitigation (loamy clay or tighter) what soil amendments will be made? No soil borings have been conducted to determine the characteristics of the soils underlying the mitigation areas MI, M2, M3, M5, and M6. However, soil probes conducted during the wetland delineation in the areas of the proposed mitigation concurred with the soil survey that the underlying soils consist of loamy clays. The decision to place organic top soil into the excavated wetland basins is to provide a suitable matrix for wetland vegetation. Vegetation of the existing adjacent wetlands (sedges and reed canary grass) will be at the same elevation as the proposed elevation for the mitigation areas. The mitigation areas M1, M2, M3, M5, and M6 are planned to match the existing elevations of the adjacent wetlands. This will place the mitigation area at the same elevations of the sedges and grasses, above the cattails of the adjacent lower wetlands. • Are organics necessary in the mitigation area? Do natives need this additional soil amendment? According to the Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey the soils in mitigation areas M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 consist of sloping Lester -Kilkenny soils. Lester -Kilkenny soils are typically underlain by a clayey loam. Excavation of the Lester - Kilkenny soils will expose the yellowish clayey loam, which is unsuitable as a matrix for vegetative growth. After the mitigation basins have been rough graded, the contractor will be able to determine if organic top soil is needed. If needed, placement of native organic top soil from the Site will ensure a suitable matrix for plant growth. What are the proposed cross sections for all 5 mitigation areas? Area 1 is provided in the application, please provide the other 5 cross -sections. Or if any are similar to area 1, indicate which basins. Mitigation areas MI, M2, M5, and M6 are similar in construction methods, slight excavation to match the adjacent existing wetland area. The cross section of MI is typical for all mitigation areas except M3 and M4. Cross section figures of the mitigation areas M3 and M4 are provided. • What is proposed to avoid or remove compaction and enhance seeding germination within the mitigation areas prior to seeding? The Seeding Plan (Appendix D) in the wetland permit application utilizes the MN/DOT Draft Seeding Manual and the Guidelines for Restoring and Managing Native Wetland Vegetation. The MN/DOT seeding manual specifies site preparation, seed installation, seeding rates, Mr. Don Asleson Pinnacle Project Number: MN07038.00 March 7, 2007 Page 4 of 5 harrowing, packing and mulch. These specifications indicate loosing of top soil prior to seeding if the broadcast or hydro seeding method is utilized. The seeding method will be determined by the contractors at the time of the seeding. The seeding and planting plan allows the contractor the flexibility to determine the best method for seeding after the contractor assesses the mitigation construction, equipment requirements, soil types, and seasonal visibilities. • Do you have a seeding diagram for the basins? Please include a copy in the wetland mitigation plan to ensure that the basins are planted appropriately. A figure defining basin M4 is provided. • Please identify the invasives (including cattail) that need to be managed within the maintenance plan. A management plan for eradicating large infestations should be included in the maintenance plan along with instructions for using Rodeo or similar MN DNR approved herbicide near water bodies. A Maintenance Plan for the mitigation and restoration is included. • Page 2: BWSR Seed Mixture W4, which is proposed for one of the restored wetlands may not be acceptable, since many of the species provided in this mixture would likely not survive the proposed Type 2/3 hydrology. BWSR Seed Mixture W1 and W2 should be utilized within each Type 2/3 replacement wetland. This wetland seed mixture was suggested for the right-of-way ditch in mitigation area M4. The Seeding Plan (Appendix A) recommended BWSR Seed Mixture W2 for the type 2 mitigation areas and BWSR Seed Mixture U6 for the upland buffer, prairie area. Page 5: "Large and/or fluffy seeds should be buried approximately Y4 inch deep." Native wetland seed buried by less than 'A inch of soil may reduce germination by approximately 90 percent. Broadcasting in the wetland, with minimal or no raking is recommended for the wetland basins. Hydoseeding within wetland basins is also acceptable and may allow the applicator to seed areas that may not support equipment. The Guidelines for Restoring & Managing Native Wetland Vegetation recommends placement of light dependant seed on top of the soils and lightly raking it in. It does not recommend the drill seeding method for wetland basins. Broadcast seeding or hydro seeding is recommended for the wetland mitigation areas, with drop seeding or drill seeding recommended for the upland buffer areas. Mr. Don Asleson Pinnacle Project Number: MN07038.00 March 7, 2007 Page 5 of 5 The seeding method will be determined by the contractors at the time of the seeding in accordance with this guidance document. The seeding and planting plan allows the contractor the flexibility to determine the best method for seeding after the contractor assesses the mitigation construction, equipment requirements, soil types, and seasonal visibilities. Page 6 -11: 'Fertilize within the replacement wetland areas.' Fertilizers are not recommended in wetland basins and are rarely required in native upland buffer areas, unless soils area found to be low in nutrients. No fertilizers will be utilized in the seeding plan. Page 8 -11: 'The site should be packed after racking.' It is recommended that the seeded area remain "rough". The wetland permit application recommends the mitigation basins be rough graded, then covered with top soil. The wetland basins will remain in "rough" conditions. Page 8, 9, and 11: 'Mulch the site with 2.0 tons per acre.' A mulching rate of 1.0 ton per acre for the wetland replacement area (wetland and upland buffer) is recommended, followed by crimping. The MN/DOT Seeding Manual 2000 recommends a 2.0 tons per acre mulching rate, while the Guidelines for Restoring & Managing Native Wetland Vegetation recommends a 1.0 ton mulching rate. We concur that the 1.0 ton mulching rate is preferred. The applicant and contractor should follow the Guidelines for Restoring & Managing Native Wetland Vegetation recommendations for mulching at a 1.0 ton per acre mulching rate. If you have any questions concerning this addendum or wish to discuss any particular aspect of the project, please contact Mike Hultgren or me at (763) 315-4501. Sincerely, PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. Scott Thelen Project Manager - Natural Resources Attachments .. 77 Ar.bc,reftj(T vci £=Farr ' T. NO It I �e °� - 1- `+r �. -. • AlterAatly t t '+ Site a �M1x -a yy Lyma nlS lv y .1 s i i 4k silo 998 920 ----- roseGrade — ------- - --_ _-_---_----_------ ------ - ----------�--ro o5e Mitiphbn a Pinnacle ✓Engineering 11541 95th Avenue North MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 (763) 315-4501 FIGURE 9b Mitigation Area M3 — Cross Section New High School — Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota PREPARED BY: SAT Di 2 8/07 Scale: Not to Scale N ,.I a Pinnacle ✓Engineering 11541 95th Avenue North MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 (763) 315-4501 ,0 FIGURE 9c Mitigation/Restoration Area M4 — Cross Section New High School — Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota PREPARED BY SAT DATE: 2/28/07 Scale: Not to Scale 11 a Wetland and Upland Maintenance Plan New High School - Chanhassen Mitigation/Restoration Area The wetland and upland buffer created for mitigation/restoration will require regular management to become established and dominated by native and noninvasive vegetation as required by the Wetland Conservation Act. This is critical in the first three to five years and should be recognized as integral to the wetland mitigation success. Management will include both eliminating non-native and invasive vegetation along with creating ideal conditions for native plants to flourish. Some invasive plants are strong competitors and without management, could hamper establishment of the native planting. Invasive wetland species such as purple loosestrife, reed canary grass, and cattail exist in many urban wetlands, and may contribute seed to the restored area. Invasive species such as common buckthorn, yellow and white sweet clover, spotted knap-weed, and Canada thistle are of concern in upland areas. Non-native plant removal/management and careful monitoring is vital during the early stages of the restoration. As native plants slowly grow and spread over the years, and as thatch builds, the site will become less vulnerable to non-native and invasive species. Without non-native and invasive plant removal/management it is highly unlikely that a diverse native plant community will become established. Methods for Invasive/Non-native Species Control 1) Mowing During the first two years of plant establishment mowing at a height of 6 to 10 inches where feasible, during the growing season, will reduce competition from annual weeds. Mowing allows light to reach the small native seedlings and reduces competition from weeds for water and soil nutrients. 2) Spot application of herbicide Individual invasive plants (including cattail) can be eradicated through wick application or spraying of herbicide. RodeoTM or other Minnesota Department of Natural Resources herbicides approved for use near /in water bodies should be applied by a licensed applicator at the appropriate times to control individual plants. 3) Eradicate large infestations with herbicide The most effective method of eradicating large colonies of plants is to wick -apply or spray them with herbicide. Use Rodeo when spray may come in contact with water and Roundup in upland situations. Repeated application will probably be necessary. Apply to green, actively growing foliage. Herbicides can effectively control herbaceous non-native vegetation when applied in spring or fall. Take great care not to apply herbicide to surrounding native plants. A very small amount of herbicide can kill a plant. 4) Cut woody stems and apply herbicide to wound All undesirable woody plants, greater than 1/4-inch in diameter, which cannot be hand -pulled should be cut down to expose the vascular tissue, or cambium. Herbicide painted on the cambium will be transported within the plant, eventually killing it. Cut the woody plant at a height that ensures the native herbaceous plants will not have contact with the stump and herbicide. This procedure should not be conducted while woody plants are dormant. Vegetation Maintenance Schedule 1) Year 1 After planting, annual weeds should be mowed (before seed set) to a height of six to ten inches or removed as needed. The site will likely require one to two mowings. Spot herbicide application, or hand removal, of aggressive weeds such as reed canary grass and thistle should also occur when the management crew is at the site to mow. Also, at the beginning of the maintenance period any undesirable shrubs in the mitigation areas should be sprayed with an appropriate herbicide. July (middle)- Mow wetland (where feasible) at a height of six to ten inches. Spot spray aggressive invasive and non-native species. September (early)- Mow wetland at a height of six to ten inches, spot spray invasive species. Buckthorn is best treated with herbicide in the fall when the plants are storing energy. Buckthorns lose their leaves later in the season than native woody plants, which allows for easier buckthorn identification and herbicide treatment in late September through early November. 2) Year 2 Conduct an initial site visit in May to evaluate status of restoration and determine management tasks for the year. These will likely include: Spring - Conduct burn approximately every third year starting the second or third year. May - Spot spray invasive species. Mow wetland at a height of six to ten inches (mowing may not be needed or may not be possible depending on wetness and condition). Re -seed areas that do not meet the performance standards. July - Mow prairie at a height of six to ten inches, spot spray invasive species. September - Spot spray invasive species. 3) Year 3 Conduct an initial site visit in May with to evaluate status of restoration and determine management tasks for the year. These will likely include: May - Spot spray invasive species. Re -seed areas that do not meet the performance standards stated below. June/July - Spot spray invasive species. September - Spot spray invasive species. 4) Year 4 and beyond Inspect wetland annually to assess its condition. Conduct spring or fall burn in year 5 and then approximately every third year thereafter (fall burns tend to increase forb diversity while spring bums tend to increase grass density). May -September - Apply herbicide to invasive species that are not controlled by burning. This should be required only once per year. eA— w� O b�sr7 � J3 ® raw_ Sobs�S � �C'.e�X nnir�— a`�6 � �w✓i ? lfvu— S� l u��^""s © Sw, f- � --1� Riley Legal Advisor: Purgatory B I u ff Creek Engineering Advisor: Watershed District Web Site: http//wwvv.rileypurgatorybluffcreek.org April 4, 2007 Mr. Jay Pomeroy Anderson -Johnson Associates Valley Square Office Center, Suite 200 7575 Golden Valley Road Minneapolis, MN 55427 Re: Permit #2007-10: Chanhassen High School: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Pomeroy: Krebsbach and Haik, Ltd. 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Barr Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 FiECEIVEA APR 2 6 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN The Board of Managers of the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans and grading and land alteration permit application as submitted to the District for the construction of the new Chanhassen High School in Chanhassen. The Managers approve of the grading and land alteration permit subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions as outlined in the attached General Provisions are applicable. If you have any questions regarding the conditions of the District's permit, please call us at 952-832-2600. Engineers for the District by the Board of Managers JRGQTOMY-BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Date: c: Paul Haik Erin Ahola Lori Haak ::0DMA\PCD0CS\D0CS\248102\l Board of Managers Howard Peterson James Landini Kenneth Wend Michael Casanova Erin Ahola Permit: #2007-10 Project Name: Chanhassen High School: Chanhassen Approval Date: April 4 2007 General Provisions 1. All erosion control measures shown on the plans must be installed prior to commencement of grading operations and be maintained until all areas altered on the site have been restored. If silt fence is used, the bottom flap must be buried and the maximum allowable spacing between posts is 4-foot on center. All posts must be either 2" x 2" pine, hardwood, or steel fence posts. If hay bales are used, all bales must be staked in place and reinforced on the downstream side with snow fence. The silt fence must be orange in color, which will be more evident and easier to locate for removal at the completion of the project. 2. All areas altered because of construction must be restored with seed and disced mulch, sod, wood fiber blanket, or be hard surfaced within two weeks from the completion of construction or no later than November 15, 2007. 3. Upon completion of construction and restoration of areas disturbed, the permit applicant is responsible for the removal of all erosion control measures installed throughout the site. 4. Street sweeping must be undertaken and completed on an as -needed basis. 5. At the entryway onto the site, a rock filter dike being a minimum of 2 feet in height and having maximum side slopes of 4:1 must be constructed. This rock filter dike will enable construction traffic to enter the site and also provide an erosion control facility. 6. The District must be notified in writing a minimum of 48 hours prior to commencement of construction. Upon receipt of this notification, a field inspection of the project site by the District's engineer will be undertaken to ensure that all erosion control measures have been properly installed. Construction cannot commence until this field inspection has been completed. 7. Upon completion of the project, the permit applicant is required to complete and submit the middle portion of the attached permit, indicating that the project has been completed. Upon receipt of this application, a field inspection of the site by the District's engineering advisor will be undertaken to ensure that all areas have been properly restored and that all erosion control measures throughout the project site have been removed. 8. The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD), its officers, employees and agents review, comment upon, and approve plans and specifications prepared by permit applicants and their consultants for the limited administrative purpose of determining whether there is reasonable assurance that the proposed project will comply with the regulations and criteria of the RPBCWD and other state and federal agencies. The determination of the RPBCWD that issuance of this permit is appropriate was made in reliance on the information provided by the applicant. ::0DMA\PCDOCS\DOCS\248102\I 0 9. The grant of this permit shall not in any way relieve the permittee, its engineer, or other professional consultants of responsibility, nor shall it make the RPBCWD responsible for the technical adequacy of the engineer's or consultants work. The grant of this permit shall not relieve the permittee from complying with all conditions and requirements of the permit, which shall be retained, by the permittee with the permit. 10. The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state, or local laws or regulations. 11. This permit is permissive only. No liability shall be imposed upon the RPBC" or any of its officers, agents or employees, officially or personally, on account of the granting of this permit or on account of any damage to any person or property resulting from any act or omission of the permittee or any of its agents, employees, or contractors. 12. In all cases where the doing by the permittee of anything authorized by this permit shall involve the taking, using, or damaging of any property, rights or interests of any other person or persons, or of any publicly owned lands or improvements or interests, the permittee, before proceeding therewith, shall obtain the written consent of all persons, agencies, or authorities concerned, and shall acquire all necessary property, rights and interest. 13. This permit is not transferable. The permittee shall make no changes, without written permission previously obtained from the RPBCWD, in the dimensions, capacity, or location of any items of work authorized by this permit. 14. The permittee shall grant access to the site at all reasonable times during and after construction to authorized representatives of the RPBCWD for inspection of the work authorized by this permit. 15. This permit may be terminated by the RPBCWD at any time deemed necessary in the interest of public health and welfare, or for violation of any of the provisions of this permit, unless otherwise provided in the special provisions. 16. Construction work authorized under this permit shall be completed on or before date specified above. The permittee may, in writing, request that the RPBCWD extend the time to complete the project and shall state the reason for any requested extension. 17. If dewatering is required and sump pumps are used, all pumped water must be discharged through an erosion control facility prior to leaving the construction site. Proper energy dissipation must be provided at the outlet of the pump system. ::ODMA\PCDOCS\DOCS\248102U 2 U1-0�0- March 30, 2007 CITY OF CI1Hl1I1HJSEN Mr. Jay Pomeroy Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. 7700Market Boulevard 7575 Golden Valley Road, Suite 200 PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Minneapolis, MN 55427 Administration Re: Chanhassen High School Phone:952227.1100 Fax 952227.1110 Planning Case 07-06 Building Inspections Dear Mr. Pomeroy: Phore:952.227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 On March 27, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 Rezoning of the Chanhassen High School site from Agricultural Estate District, Fax:952.227.1170 A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office and Institutional District, OI. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax:952.227.1110 Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek Corridor with a Park & Recreation Variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary zone, in Phone:952.227.1120 conformance with the grading plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc., Fax:952.227.1110 dated 02-02-07, subject to the following conditions: Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952227.t400 project 1. The construction activities associated with the proposed P ro ect shall not Fax 952.227.1404 conflict with the easement granted to MnDOT for its wetland mitigation project. Planning & Natural Resources Phone:952.227,1130 2. To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor, the applicant shall submit Fax:952.227.1110 a plan for the restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor (including the drainageway along the north side of the substation and the area Public works 1591 Park Road east of the bus/event entrance) with species consistent with the City's Bluff Phone:952.227.1300 Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan. Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Site Plan with Variances for a three-story building and uplighting for a High Phone:952.227.1125 School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot building, athletic Fax:952.227.1110 fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots, Web site Plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07, subject to the www.ci.rnantnssen.mn.us following conditions: The developer shall add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas, plazas and scenic overlooks. Bicycle parking pads and storage racks shall be provided on site. 2. The developer shall include angled visitor parking in the drop-off access west of the building entrance. SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. Mr. Jay Pomeroy Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 27, 2007 Page 2 3. The building fagade flood lights shall be permitted contingent upon meeting the intent of the lighting ordinance and subject to city review and approval. 4. Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalks or trails connect. 5. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by opening day of the school: Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection. Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for the addition of a north leg to the intersection. Construct the following turn lanes: Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North Bypass lane School Access Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North 200 feet School Access Westbound North School Access at Through lane becomes 300 feet Lyman Boulevard turn lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 100 feet Lyman Boulevard Westbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 300 feet Build Lyman Boulevard through/right Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon 200 feet Road South Westbound Lyman Boulevard at 200 feet Audubon Road South Northbound Audubon Road South at Build to add through Lyman Boulevard lane Southbound Audubon Road South at 200 feet Build Lyman Boulevard I I through/fight In addition the School District shall participate in the cost of the upgrading of Lyman Boulevard on a fair and equitable basis. 6. Building Official Conditions: a. The buildings must he protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems. Mr. Jay Pomeroy Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 27, 2007 Page 3 b. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls). d. Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 7. Fire Marshal Conditions: a. A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant tc Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. c. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.3. d. Yellow curbing and "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of signs to be installed. e. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. f. Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.4. 8. Forester Conditions: a. Increase plantings for parking lot area in order to meet ordinance requirement of 156 trees. b. Replace Black Hills spruce seedlings with white spruce. c. Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected. Fencing shall be installed around trees prior to grading. d. Understory seedlings shall be located among overstory deciduous trees. Mr. Jay Pomeroy Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 27, 2007 Page 4 e. The applicant shall increase the quantity of seedlings planted in each grouping. f. All deciduous seedlings shall be protected by tree tubes. Tubes shall be monitored and removed at the appropriate time. All tubes shall be fitted with protective bird netting. g. All ash trees shall be replaced by an alternative species. h. The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yard plantings along the east property line. Native shrubs and vines shall be incorporated into the landscape in addition to trees. i. The columnar Norway maple shall be replaced with a different columnar tree such as Armstrong red maple, Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species. 9. Engineer Conditions: a. The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses to Lyman Boulevard. b. ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska to construct the access through the substation property. c. Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland/wetland mitigation and Lyman Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100-year event. d. Additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future width of Lyman Boulevard will be treated in the ponds. e. Hydrology to the wetland/wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point must be maintained. f. The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting. g. The development team should reexamine the proposed grades within the infield of softball field 1 to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher's mound. h. Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner. i. Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must be approved by the appropriate private utilities. j. Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan. k. The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer. Mr. Jay Pomeroy Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 27, 2007 Page 5 1. Pond, drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands. m. The developer must adjust the sanitary sewer manhole elevations according to City standard detail plates. n. The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine if the high school construction has damaged the pipe. If the City televises this sanitary sewer before the high school construction mobilized, the developer will only be required to televise the line after construction. is complete. o. The school district will be reimbursed $166,424.00 which is the cost difference between the 18-inch trunk and 10-inch lateral watermain. p. Trunk water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued. q. The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds. r. Based on the proposed utility plan, an irrigation meter is required. s. The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer, existing overhead utilities and existing gas pipelines. t. Mylar and digital as-builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver County coordinates. 10. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions: a. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner compliant with the project's Wetland Alteration Permit, Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). b. The project shall comply with the conditions of its Conditional Use Permit for Development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. c. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including all information required by the NPDES Construction Site Permit shall be located at the job trailer. d. Stable emergency overflows shall be provided for the proposed ponds on site. The emergency overflows shall be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed. The emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re -enforcement mat or fabric and riprap. Mr. Jay Pomeroy Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 27, 2007 Page 6 e. The plan shall include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site. The timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow area. The rate of mulch application shall also be included on the plans (2 tons per acre, disc anchored). f. All riprap/fabric at the flared end section shall be installed within 24 hours of flared end section installation. g. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: TTypg of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. h. Silt fence that is not placed on the contour shall have J-Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet. L Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas. The areas of temporary sediment basins shall be labeled on the plan. A temporary and/or permanent sediment pond shall be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared End Sections (FES) 7 and 8. This shall be installed prior to grading and then used as a temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland. If it is used as a temporary pond, it should stay in place until all turf is established. Temporary outlet structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) shall be provided for the ponds; details should be provided. j. Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering methods from the City's project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior to conducting any and all dewatering on -site. k. Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets. 1. The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A). in. The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area. Mr. Jay Pomeroy Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 27, 2007 Page 7 n. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. o. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (i.e., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. 11. The applicant and city staff shall look at reasonable alternative designs to reduce the impact of the retaining walls. Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on the site of the Chanhassen High School, plans prepared by Pinnacle Engineering, dated February 9, 2007, subject to the following conditions: A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. All wetlands and wetland buffer areas shall be protected by silt fence during grading. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans. 2. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). 3. The applicant shall provide additional information as to how the vegetative communities and hydrology for Wetlands C and D will be re-established. 4. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 5. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit. .A Mr. Jay Pomeroy Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 27, 2007 Page 8 Enclosed is a site plan agreement that must be executed by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. Note that the school district will need to sign the owner consent at the end of the agreement. Return the agreement to me for City execution and recording at Carver County within 120 days of the approval (by July 24, 2007). The required security specified in the site plan agreement shall be submitted prior to the City issuing a building permit. A copy of the executed agreement will be returned for your files. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Since Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure c: Steve Pumper, ISD 112 ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Jerry Mohn, Building Official gAplan\2007 planning cases\07-06 chanhassen high schcollappmval letter.dm L CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT #07-06 SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated March 26, 2007, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storagetmamtenance buildings and parking lots (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A —Site Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan B—Grading & Drainage Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan C--Landscaping Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan D—Utility Plans prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan E—Electric Plan prepared by Hallberg Engineering, PC, dated 02-01-07. Plan F—Architectural Plan prepared by Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc., dated 02-02-07. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by August 1, 2009. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $5,000.00 (boulevard restoration, erosion control and landscaping). If the Developer requests a J Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said landscaping. PROCEDURES FOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Jay Pomeroy Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. 7575 Golden Valley Road, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55427 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. City Council approves the Site Plan with Variance for a three- story building and up lighting for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storagetmaintenance buildings and parking lots, subject to the following conditions: a. The developer shall add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas, plazas and scenic overlooks. Bicycle parking pads and storage racks shall be provided on site. b. The developer shall include angled visitor parking in the drop-off access west of the building entrance. c. The building fagade flood lights shall be permitted contingent upon meeting the intent of the lighting ordinance and subject to city review and approval. d. Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalks or trails connect. 2 e. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by opening day of the school: • Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection. • Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for the addition of a north leg to the intersection. • Construct the following turn lanes: Approach }W Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North Bypass lane School Access Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North 200 feet School Access Westbound North School Access at Through lane becomes 300 feet Lyman Boulevard turn lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 100 feet Lyman Boulevard Westbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 300 feet Build through/right Lyman Boulevard Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon 200 feet Road South Westbound Lyman Boulevard at 200 feet Audubon Road South Northbound Audubon Road South at Build to add through Lyman Boulevard 1 lane Southbound Audubon Road South at 200 feet Build through/right Lyman Boulevard • In addition the School District shall participate in the cost of the upgrading of Lyman Boulevard on a fair and equitable basis. f. Building Official Conditions: 1) The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 2) The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3) Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls). 4) Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. g. Fire Marshal Conditions: 1) A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 2) Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 3) Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 4) Yellow curbing and "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of signs to be installed. 5) No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6) Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.4. h. Forester Conditions: 1) Increase plantings for parking lot area in order to meet ordinance requirement of 156 trees. 2) Replace Black Hills spruce seedlings with white spruce. 3) Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected. Fencing shall be installed around trees prior to grading. 4) Understory seedlings shall be located among overstory deciduous trees. 5) The applicant shall increase the quantity of seedlings planted in each grouping. 6) All deciduous seedlings shall be protected by tree tubes. Tubes shall be monitored and removed at the appropriate time. All tubes shall be fitted with protective bird netting. 7) All ash trees shall be replaced by an alternative species. El i 8) The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yard plantings along the east property line. Native shrubs and vines shall be incorporated into the landscape in addition to trees. 9) The columnar Norway maple shall be replaced with a different columnar tree such as Armstrong red maple, Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species. i. Engineer Conditions: 1) The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses to Lyman Boulevard. 2) ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska to construct the access through the substation property. 3) Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland/wetland mitigation and Lyman Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100-year event. 4) Additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future width of Lyman Boulevard will be treated in the ponds. 5) Hydrology to the wetland/wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point must be maintained. 6) The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting. 7) The development team should reexamine the proposed grades within the infield of softball field 1 to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher's mound. 8) Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner. 9) Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must be approved by the appropriate private utilities. 10) Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan. 11) The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer. 12) Pond, drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands. 13) The developer must adjust the sanitary sewer manhole elevations according to City standard detail plates. 14) The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine if the high school construction has damaged the pipe. If the City televises this sanitary sewer before the high school construction mobilized, the developer will only be required to televise the line after construction is complete. 5 15) The school district will be reimbursed $166,424.00 which is the cost difference between the 18-inch trunk and 10-inch lateral watermain. 16) Trunk water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued. 17) The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds. 18) Based on the proposed utility plan, an irrigation meter is required. 19) The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer, existing overhead utilities and existing gas pipelines. 20) Mylar and digital as-builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver County coordinates. j. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions: 1) Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner compliant with the project's Wetland Alteration Permit, Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). 2) The project shall comply with the conditions of its Conditional Use Permit for Development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 3) The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including all information required by the NPDES Construction Site Permit shall be located at the job trailer. 4) Stable emergency overflows shall be provided for the proposed ponds on site. The emergency overflows shall be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed. The emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re -enforcement mat or fabric and riprap. 5) The plan shall include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site. The timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow area. The rate of mulch application shall also be included on the plans (2 tons per acre, disc anchored). 6) All riprap/fabric at the flared end section shall be installed within 24 hours of flared end section installation. 161 7) Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slone Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8) Silt fence that is not placed on the contour shall have J-Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet. 9) Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas. The areas of temporary sediment basins shall be labeled on the plan. A temporary and/or permanent sediment pond shall be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared End Sections (FES) 7 and 8. This shall be installed prior to grading and then used as a temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland. If it is used as a temporary pond, it should stay in place until all turf is established. Temporary outlet structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) shall be provided for the ponds; details should be provided. 10) Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering methods from the City's project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior to conducting any and all dewatering on -site. 11) Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets. 12) The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A). 13) The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area. 14) Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 15)The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (i.e., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. k. The applicant and city staff shall look at reasonable alternative designs to reduce the impact of the retaining walls. 7 .0 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit 'B" and incorporated herein. CITY OF CHANHASSEN M 00 Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager DEVELOPER: ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. FU Jay Pomeroy Its STATE OF M04NESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_day of , 200_, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 20_ by Jay Pomeroy, the of Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., on behalf of the developer. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard R O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 EXIIIBIT A (Per Warranty Deed Document No. 148445) That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast corner thereof, thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSIl MSS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest comer thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00feet along said east line to the point of beginning. W ..t Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest comer of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. 10 10 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developers expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6_ Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims 11 made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attomeys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is fast given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on -site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. R Recording. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall 12 0 ,* not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. ations. In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. 13 CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of 200_ Print: Title: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_ , by DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 NOTARY PUBLIC 14 0­7 - o (o CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. and Independent School District 112 for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office and Institutional District, OI; Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storagetmaintenance buildings and parking lots; Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District; and Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on site. On March 6, 2007, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. and Independent School District 112 for a High School Campus including rezoning, site plan review with variances, conditional use permit with variances and a wetland alteration permit. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned A2, Agricultural Estate District, and PUD, Planned Unit Development. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office Institutional and Office/Industrial. 3. The legal description of the property is: see Exhibit A. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance contingent on approval of the variances. d. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. Conditional Use Permit: a. The proposed project will not be detrimental to or enhance the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. The proposed project will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. C. The proposed project will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. The proposed project will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed project will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed project ill not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed project will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed project will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed project will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. The proposed project will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed project will not depreciate surrounding property values. The proposed project will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. 6. Site Plan Review: a. The proposed project is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. The proposed project is consistent with the site plan review requirements; C. The proposed project preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; d. The proposed project creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. The proposed project creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1). An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2). The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3). Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4). Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. The proposed project protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Variance (Bluff Creek Primary Zone Encroachment): 3 a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre- existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre- existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. Finding: The granting of the variance to encroach in to the Bluff Creek primary zone is unavoidable due to the configuration of the Audubon Road (C.S.A.H. 17) and Lyman Boulevard (C.S.A.H. 18) intersection and the access to the site. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: Entrance drives are generally not as proscribed as that for the High School site. The encroachment in to the primary zone is unavoidable. C. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The location of the entrance drive does not increase the value or income potential of the high school site. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The hardship is not self created since the variance is unavoidable due to the configuration of the Audubon Road (C.S.A.H. 17) and Lyman Boulevard (C.S.A.H. 18) intersection and the access to the site. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. The project will create additional buffer zones and enhance the bluff creek corridor. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 0 8. Variance (Three Story and uplighting): a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. Finding: The need for a variance is due to the type and function of building as a school and the direction that the city provided the school to try to reduce site grading. The construction of a walkout type building is warranted. Normally, the lower, basement, level would not be included as a story. However because the lower floor elevation is more than 12 feet, it is by definition a story. Additionally, the intent of the up lighting is to highlight the building and provide a means to further identify the site. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which the variance is based are unique to the proposed development of the site for a high school. C. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel, but to the utilization of the site in an efficient manner and to provide an enhanced identity to the building. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The alleged difficulty or hardship is due to direction provided by the city. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. The up lightning shall be limited in its duration and only during events or activities at the school. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 9. The planning report #07-06 dated March 6, 2007, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning, conditional use permit with variance, site plan with variances and a wetland alteration permit for the Chanhassen High School Campus. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 6`s day of March, 2007. 11 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Per Warranty Deed Document No. 148445) That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter comer of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast corner thereof, thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest corner thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 7 550.00feet along said east line to the point of beginning. Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest corner of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. E3 6-1- 6,0 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 15. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Site Permit)) and comply with their conditions of approval. 17. Provide drainage area maps and calculations to ensure that they are the same as what was previously accepted. 18. Provide rational method calculations for the storm sewer. 19. Ground (i.e. non -paved) surface grades shall not be less than 2%. Paved grades shall not be less than I%. Grades along curb line must not be less than .5%. 20. Emergency overflow locations and elevations must be shown on the plan. 21. An easement is required from the appropriate property owner for any off -site grading. 22. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 23. Areas disturbed areas in City right of way must be sodded. 24. Show heavy duty and light duty pavement sections on the plans. 25. Access for tractor trailers shall be limited to 82°d Street." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman Peterson: Now you can build it. Mayor Furlong: And I think Ms. Aanenson, with regard to the direction from the Planning Commission on reviewing that, I think the council, I didn't hear any objection to that and I think that makes a lot of sense. APPLICANT, ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC., AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 112: A. REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 B. REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH VARIANCES FOR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT• C. CONSIDER SITE PLAN APPROVAL WITH VARIANCES FOR A HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS INCLUDING AN APPROXIMATELY 406,000 SO. FT., 3 STORY BUILDING, ATHLETIC FIELDS, CONCESSION BUILDING, STADIUM, STORAGEIMAINTENANCE BUILDING AND PARKING LOTS; D. REQUEST FOR A WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT FOR THE GRADING AND FILLING OF WETLANDS ON SITE. Public Present: Name Address Steve Pumper 11 Peavey Road, Chaska Mark Bosca 8585 West 78`" Street, Bloomington Paul Schlueter 11 Peavey Road, Chaska Jay Pomeroy 7575 Golden Valley Road, Suite 200, Minneapolis Kate Aanenson: Thank you Mayor, members of the council. Again the review of the high school. You have seen this when we did the environmental assessment document, but this is the continuation of the final site plan approval. There are several other actions being requested tonight. This item did appear before the Planning Commission with the public hearing on March Oh. There are several issues that were addressed at the Planning Commission. Some of those were by the Park and Rec Commission regarding additional parking and trip consideration. The school has addressed those by putting them in as a bid alternative so they will get the cost on those. They did add additional sidewalk that was requested and III go through these and show you on the site plan in a moment. And then there was also some questions addressed regarding the retaining wall and some landscaping, which I'll go into a little more detail but they did recommend approval of the site plan. The one issue that the Planning Commission altered from too was up lighting. The staff had recommended against the up lighting but the Planning Commission felt that they would grant a variance to allow for up lighting and supporting findings of fact were submitted for that. So you have that in your staff report. So the action before you tonight then is for one, a rezoning. A site plan approval with variances. Conditional use with variances, and then a wetland alteration permit. The subject site is located on Lyman Boulevard bordered on the north. The railroad tracks. Stone Creek and an industrial park in Chaska and two subdivisions to the east. One large lot and then Bluff Creek runs along the eastern trace of the property. The site itself is 95 acres, although there's a significant portion of it encumbered in the creek itself. The high school's intended to house 2,000 students, grades 9 through 12 and it will be about approximately 406,000 square feet, which is just slightly smaller than the Chaska site. Again before this item went to the Planning Commission, a neighborhood meeting was held and hosted by the high school. Staff was in attendance for that to address questions for the neighborhood. listed in your staff report again are some of those questions that were addressed, and I believe they've been answered pretty much to the neighbors satisfaction. There is this site itself is challenging in topography and I'll go through some of those challenges 0 03NN0:I City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 as we talk about the site plan in a minute but there's 90 feet in change. On the entire 95 acres, so that in itself presents some challenges. This is north, but in order to this entire site on the map, I think that works best. So the overview of the site itself, they talked about the square footage and the change in grade. The 25 acres of wetland. The railroad tracks on the northern end. Lyman Boulevard, a county collector road along the entire sight line. The Chaska utility sub -station located there. And the gas pipeline that runs through the middle of the site, all directed, the formation of how the school itself laid out, which was a challenge for the school district itself in order to lay it out. So with that layout the OI district does also require or permit 2 stories. Because this is 12 feet, more than 12 feet at certain points because of the gymnasium, that is the one variance that is being requested for the site itself. The staff liked the walkout look. Putting the gymnasium on the southern end of the site and did support and did encourage the school to lay it out in that format and we are recommending approval of that variance on that site itself. Again the change in grade with the Bluff Creek and the layout again was, provided some of those opportunities for that walkout which we think, and the bus drive, bus circulation made a good layout. It also abuts the primary zone district, Bluff Creek Overlay District. As you recall this project went to the environmental assessment when we did the grading itself but on page 5 there was 3 major issues that the EAW identified would be traffic, and that would be access off of Lyman Boulevard. The wetland impacts, which well talk a little bit more, and the storm water runoff. That issue was also addressed. Again there's two separate projects. MnDot's doing a wetland replacement project on the creek itself as part of the 212 overlay district, so that's their project. One of the residents did raise a question regarding erosion control. Staff did talk to MnDot and Pollution Control Agency regarding mitigations. Some of the people thought there should be additional woodchips and the like and we were concerned with a super rain event that we'd actually end up with more chips in the creek itself, so we're monitoring that and managing the storm water runoff, just to make sure that that... The council did approve a dual guiding on this property and said if the school district chose not to go forward, so the land use and rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan. That's one of your actions tonight. So it is consistent with that. So the school itself, we talked about the 3 story building located in this area. The main drive. This is the Chaska sub -station. This is one of the variances right through here, in order to, the Bluff Creek Overlay District in order to get onto the site to make the T intersection at Audubon. There's a minor impact to the wetland in the overlay district in order to make that access for the bus circulation. In looking at the layout itself with that traffic signal on the bluff location, we did study early on several different approaches to get into the site itself for the bus and that seemed to be the best place for that to occur. So that was a variance request right there. I'm not going to spend a lot of time going through the architectural details. We do have the color samples here for the building itself. This building doesn't look similar to the one in Chaska. Different looking building, reflecting the tones of the, kind of more the earth tones, reflecting to the area. Does meet the standards, except for the variance requirement. There was some questions regarding on the landscaping itself. This was also brought up with the planning commission regarding, there are native grasses that are being proposed adjacent to the Bluff Creek is what we're proposing as part of the overlay district enhancement, which we had recommended to the school district. There's also a 3 inch minimum on the trees. Again those will be put in over time. They're not going to all go in at once, and I think that's something that the school, the students will be working on too over time. There was some other questions regarding species. They're doing native species which we requested again following the overlay district, the Bluff Creek plan that we wanted to have, so just some recommendations on species 0 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 types that are native. And just some other species recommendations regarding some diseased trees and significant amount of the same type of tree itself. The parking lot, we talked about this being the main entrance with the signal. The other recommendation for a signal is, you have about a million square feet of the industrial park here, and this will also be a signalized intersection. There is a railroad tracks which is part of the upgrade of Lyman Boulevard, will include the crossing arms, which will be incorporated into the project itself, and I know the school district would like to see another signal at this location but that hasn't been decided at this time. It was not, it was their request. It was not part of the recommendation of the EAW. So lighting plan, I'm on page 11 of the staff report. There are light standards in all the parking lots. They're segmenting the parking's be again bus transportation, student drop off and then student parking. There's extra parking for special events, football games, school activities, concerts and the like. But one of the requests was to do some up lighting. The staff had recommended that, because we don't allow up lighting, that would be shining into the sky, showing off the architecture but the Planning Commission felt that due to the importance of the building that they felt as a community place that it might be important thing to do. One of the conditions then was to allow that only during special activities and there'd be a limit to that. Most of those activities are done by 11:00 p.m. so that was their condition that they put on there. Again on page 13 there was recommendations regarding those traffic improvements, with Lyman Boulevard being upgraded. We talked about the traffic signals, besides the one at Audubon, being a 4 legged intersection and Lyman Boulevard. Also Lyman Boulevard and there needs to be right turns, acceleration, deceleration lanes that need to be put in place too prior to the opening in 2009. Now I'll take a minute and talk about retaining walls. Any other questions on the site itself. I didn't go through the wetland impact. There is a wetland here. There's a wetland here. There's some impact up in this area here. There's a little bit of an anomaly through here. We have wetlands here, so they're meeting all the requirements of the wetland replacement on site. Managing all the storm water on site. Mayor Furlong: Real quick then on, what we're seeing there in terms of the blue, those will be the retention ponds? Kate Aanenson: Some of them are retention ponds. Mayor Furlong: And some are just natural wetlands? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Mayor Furlong: That will be retained? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And then so the mitigation is where, up in the northeast portion? Kate Aanenson: The mitigation, actually here. Mitigation here and here. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. 10 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Kate Aanenson: Let me just go back to, I did make a map. Hopefully you can see this. The lighting itself. This is the school, so we're on the back side of the school. This is just, zoom in on that. So this is the gymnasium. This is Bluff Creek down in this area here where my pencil is, so this would be the up lighting here where the gymnasium is. This is coming in at that entrance to go to a basketball game. This is on the, facing the west which would be Lyman Boulevard over here. Shining on the building, and that was some of the reasons that the Planning Commission felt that maybe there wasn't as much view from the neighbors across the way, although they would be able to see this part of it here. So they're in the thought process of the lighting itself, and of course they have lighting on the flags, like I said too. The retaining walls. There are two different sizes of walls that are being put in place. One using big block, and those are shown in blue. When I say big block, they're 2 feet by 4 feet, and that's in areas, in this area of walls, almost 30 feet high. This wall has been eliminated. It's actually on this site, and then the walls shown in pink are smaller. Some of them are terraced. This one has been modified to be terraced, and those are traditional standard block walls, which is much smaller in scale. They did try to terrace where they could. Again based on the constraints of the site regarding the gas line, the pinching of the creek. This is the one they were able to modify to create two walls. In this area it will be problematic because we're already pinched by the, if you go back to... So this is that, the tallest retaining wall right through here. That would be terraced because you're into, it's off of, if you've been up to the electrical sub -station, it drops off dramatically towards the creek, so what you'd do is just impacting the creek greater. There wouldn't be any activity, as much visibility right there. This wall that's in this area has been terraced, so it'd be two stepped, so in that area where it's terraced there'll be additional landscaping. That was one of the requirements of the landscaping in those areas that we do create... provide on the top of the walls too, to terrace those. But in these areas where you have walls and try to terrace them, you're eliminating parking or you're impacting... This wall is terraced. Some of these are terraced, such as in here, but all of the walls were, are proposed to be. Talked about storm water, I believe just kind of briefly going through that. Again there is a sheet giving you the length and the height of all the walls on page 19 of the staff report so I can answer any questions on that. Councilman Peterson: Excuse me. Kate Aanenson: Go ahead. Councilman Peterson: Going back to that picture in the center again. If you look at the entrance where you said if we did terrace that it would go into, you endanger the creek at a higher rate. Again my logic says if we terrace it and let the water go down between the terrace, and do plantings there, that that would act as a rain garden. It would help the creek. Again that's just a lay person saying it doesn't make sense that, I would think it would help the creek if you terrace it but. Kate Aanenson: There's a utility right here. Paul, I'm not sure what. Paul Oehme: It's a sewer. 11 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Kate Aanenson: It's a sewer right through here so, that's part of that steeper area right through here too so, typically what they like to do if you terrace, if you terrace a 10 foot wall, you want a 10 foot separation. That's the MnDot standard so in that area, you could, you don't have to break it in half. You could go, which I believe the wall on the northern portion is terraced at say 5 and 10. There's different ways to break that. Doing the shorter portion on the top and the taller portion on the bottom. I can ask the engineers if their response to looking, investigating some of that. Do you want to, do you want me to go through the rest of it and then we can talk about it? Councilman Peterson: One more question. On the wall that we did terrace. So now that it's terraced, over to the left, yeah. What its going to look like? What are the numbers on it? Do you know? Mayor Furlong: Which number wall is that? Is that 19? Kate Aanenson: It's 24 feet. I believe it was terraced, was it like 4 feet? Jay Pomeroy: Yeah, it's like 24 feet, give or take, and then a 3 foot drop. Or let's go from the top. 3 foot drop and then 24 feet down. Councilman Peterson: Okay. Mayor Furlong: So it was 27 and you've got a 3 and a 24? Jay Pomeroy: It varies a little bit. Kate Aanenson: And all the fences or retaining walls will have fences on the top. Do you want me to have them answer the question on possibly terracing the other one? Councilman Peterson: We can come back. Why don't you go ahead and finish. Kate Aanenson: Okay. So again just to summarize, the rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan. To office institutional. The site plan with the variance for the height. Again there was discussion that we had recommended against the up lighting. The Planning Commission did support it. I have given you another motion to go a different way if that's your so chosen. The impact to the Bluff Creek Overlay District for the entrance to the driveway because we wanted that to be a T intersection at Audubon and Lyman, so that forced that impact with the grading coming off of the electrical sub -station. We felt that was the most appropriate place. Again the environmental assessment document also backed that up. And then the wetland alteration permit for the filling of the wetlands which are being replaced on site in compliance with the wetland conservation act. So with that, we're recommending approval of the motions before you. Any questions I'd be happy to answer. Mayor Furlong: Just to clarify in the lighting Kate. You said you gave us something. Is that this right here that was distributed? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. 12 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Mayor Furlong: Okay. And this basically would, was what? Kate Aanenson: That's the staffs original recommendation. That there would be no up lighting. If you went within the staff report, that would reflect what the Planning Commission did. Mayor Furlong: This is what went originally to the Planning Commission from staff. Kate Aanenson: Yep, from the staff. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: And there's findings with both, whichever way you support. Councilwoman Ernst: Kate can you explain to me the reasons why we wouldn't want the up lighting. Kate Aanenson: Well the City a number of years ago passed an ordinance restricting up lighting. It did cut off for sky light penetration, so especially when you're adjacent to neighborhoods. They don't have that glow. For example on ballfields and those sort of things. Street lights. Parking lot lights. We've lowered that height so we don't have a lot of light. We have a requirement that you have to cut off, but there's still light that goes up into the sky and so we changed our ordinance to have cut off if it does go up. There's only one variance that I'm aware of that we've given recently and that was to the cinema. That's because the findings that the council made at that time for the variance was that it's in the core of downtown. Downtown central business district and had supported that there'd be a small amount of up lighting on the cinema itself, and that's the only one I'm aware of that we've given that type of up lighting. So, there's been other requests but that's the only one that we've supported, so that we were just consistent with that. And I think the Planning Commission just took approach that this was kind of a public building that maybe at a football game or some special activity going on at the school, that they wanted to you know. Obviously safety's very important and there's enough parking lot lighting to accommodate that, but just kind of draw attention if there's something special going on at the school. And as long as they cut it off at a certain time so it doesn't become a nuisance to the neighbors. That's when we get the complaints on the spillover lighting. Some of the neighbors complain when they look out their windows, that there's bright lights coming across, even though there's a cut off at the property line. Councilwoman Ernst: Thank you. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Speaking of bright lights Kate, the monument sign that they'll have at the high school. Do we have any regulations about what that would be like? As far as how it's lit and what type of sign it is? Councilman Peterson: No LED? Councilwoman Tjomhom: I didn't want to specifically spit that out but I was going to go there. 13 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Mayor Furlong: Would it have to meet our city ordinance? Kate Aanenson: Yes. We have a city ordinance. We have allowed those as conditional uses. For example we do have one at Chapel Hill has one that's a conditional use and there's regulations on those size and I know that Minnetonka just put one up too. So they can program activities instead of doing the changeable copies. But again those would be, we can regulate those under conditional use where you attach conditions to mitigate that such as they're shut off at night. Do those sort of things after a certain time. Mayor Furlong: And that is not before us this evening? Kate Aanenson: No. They have not submitted that or given that indication to us tonight what they're doing. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: The Legion and Cinema are two other examples where we allowed. Kate Aanenson: Yep. And I think the library which just has open and close, our library up here is just the hours and that's yeah, LED. Todd Gerhardt: It's not LED though. Mayor Furlong: Other questions for staff. Go ahead. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Yeah, just for a comfort level. You know I mean the railroad tracks kind of bother me a little bit for safety. So can we address that a little bit? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. As a matter of fact I did, one of the other issues that was brought up by the neighborhood, which we didn't spend a lot of time on. This is actually the Eden Prairie High School. And the railroad tracks for the Eden Prairie High School are really pretty much in the same proximity to the entrance. They also have a crossing arm. We went over there to look at, there's posting of no parking in the neighborhood. We didn't want to post that right away. I know that was a concern of the neighbors but we committed to monitor that. The neighbors were concerned that people would park and then walk over to the school instead of paying a parking fee so we'd monitor that. Eden Prairie has got that posted for immediate neighbors that you can't park during the school hours, before and then just after. We didn't observe parked cars there, so that seems to be working. And if you look at the entrances, it's pretty similar. Railroad tracks. Pretty similar in proximity to one of the main entrances to the school, so this is where most of the student parking is coming in. There's also, if you come this way, what will they do ... so in looking at that with the crossing arm, we feel that that's a similar situation. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And now this is a laymen question. These trains, are they usually running on a schedule so we kind of know what time a train comes? 14 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Kate Aanenson: You can go to the Twin Cities and Western's web site and right now they're running 2 or 3 and they are looking to moving that up to maybe 4 to 6 trains a day. Are they always regular? No. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. Mayor Furlong: Other questions for staff at this time? Kate Aanenson: I just want to point out one thing while we're talking about railroad tracks. I'm not sure if you're aware but we do have an underpass for the Stone Creek neighborhood that goes up, a railroad trestle that goes under. Mayor Furlong: Why don't you move the Eden Prairie picture off. Kate Aanenson: Oh I'm sorry. Underneath the railroad tracks. Way up here. That goes under, so there is a way to go underneath the tracks. For those neighbors that want to walk. Councilwoman Tjomhom: And ride their bikes, okay. Kate Aanenson: And fencing and the like... similar to what Eden Prairie has too. Todd Gerhardt: Isn't it quite steep there too Kate? Kate Aanenson: It is. Todd Gerhardt: And it's probably 20 plus feet above the, you know the base of the underpass. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So all those trails do connect but there is a controlled way to get under the tracks, so it's easily accessible and visible. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I know that in Minnetonka, in the high school, when you drive through they're full of speed bumps. There's not going to be, will there be those type of things? No? Councilman Litsey: Not at first anyway. Mayor Furlong: Ms. Aanenson on the crossing arm for the railroad crossing. Is that, that doesn't exist there now, correct? Kate Aanenson: No, there's no crossing arms but it's going to be a requirement. Paul Oehme: There is crossing arms. Kate Aanenson: There is? Oh, okay. 15 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Paul Oehme: Very old. Kate Aanenson: They're old. When we widen the road, that will be replaced so, yeah. To make those improvements but, yes. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. Councilman Litsey: Kate I had a question on the, one of the questions that came up at that neighborhood meeting on January 18`" had to do with the streets and the networking that will take place to handle the traffic for this project. What, I mean there's some recommendations in here but is that, is it like Lyman, is that sufficient to handle without any significant traffic volume that's going to come through there? Kate Aanenson: Well that's why we did the environmental assessment document and that's just a summary of the modeling for the traffic itself and directional traffic was done. And that, page 14. It gives you the improvements, the turning movements that need to be made. Councilman Litsey: Right. Kate Aanenson: Now there's a full blown traffic study that was done as a part of that environmental assessment. I didn't attach that but that gives you what directions the students would be coming from. Councilman Litsey: And what directions would they predominantly be going? Kate Aanenson: Well, if I can recall. There was actually about 25% coming down Audubon and maybe you can help me Paul. 25 on Lyman. Yeah, west Lyman. I was surprised that there was that much coming south. So yes, Lyman with improvement should be able to handle, that's what the traffic study said with these improvements. Councilman Litsey: But these improvements are pretty superficial overall. I mean we're not talking about major road reconstruction here, right? Paul Oehme: You want to. Todd Gerhardt: Well the County is out right now preparing a Request for Proposal to look at the segment basically from what would be Galpin all the way over to the second segment of Audubon where a lift station is. It would taper down there. And preparing a Request for Proposal, they would probably looking at upgrading that roadway to either a super 2 or 4 lane roadway section as Phase I. And then ultimately from 41 to match up with the road segment at Powers and Lyman. So my gut feeling is that it would probably be done in phases, and with this being the first phase from Galpin over to second phase of Audubon as it goes north into Chanhassen. Itl City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Kate Aanenson: Right. What's in the staff report is the turning lanes that need to be to accommodate the school. Councilman Litsey: Right. Kate Aanenson: Obviously it's, it would be prudent to do both together so that the school doesn't have to put up a temporary signal and then do a new signal in 3 years down the road so we'd like to see the two go together, but these are the improvements that need to be made for the school to have the safety. Councilman Litsey: It just seems to me that we know Lyman's going to have to be upgraded. I mean it can't really handle what's there now. We're adding this to it. As part of this project, doesn't it make sense to take a look at the whole road situation and look at some partners and perhaps sharing in the cost for that upgrade? And I don't know if that could be done as part of this document or not but, and I know there's a past agreement where the City, and I know this is I guess apparently in disagreement. Maybe on the hook for the vast majority of the cost of improvements to that road. Why wait down the road this project's going in? Why not look at that as part of this project and what we can do to accelerate perhaps the improvements to that road and look at the school district and the county perhaps as partners in helping pay that cost or down the road the city's probably going to be potentially footing the bill for a $10 million plus project. Perhaps 80% of it. Todd Gerhardt: Well I don't, you know we've been having discussions with the school district, the City of Chaska and Carver County and I think we're going in the right direction. Everybody sees the importance of seeing Lyman upgrade and matching in with the segment of Lyman that is east of Powers Boulevard over to 101 that was filled in with the 212 improvements and you're absolutely right. The school district recognizes that the City of Chanhassen, Chaska, Carver County, we only want to put these improvements in once and if we can get together and move ahead, that would be great and that's what we're trying to do here. Carver County is putting together Requests for Proposal for engineering services to start laying out the design and cost estimates. Basically doing a feasibility study for Lyman Boulevard. Once we have those numbers, then we can sit down and really start talking about the percentages. Conceptually I think we have some percentages that I'd like to bring back to the council in the future, once we have those estimates for the road, but from the school standpoint, they know they need to be open in 2009 and so they have to kind of dual track this. If for some reason we can't get the road done or come to an agreement on it, they're going to need to put up temporary signals and turn lanes to get into their site so, we're kind of dual tracking this but staff is in agreement with you Bryan, and probably the rest of the council that we should upgrade the road and do all these improvements at once. Don't do them twice. Councilman Litsey: Right. Todd Gerhardt: And that's how we're trying to track it. Councilman Litsey: ...the school to partner in this if this goes through this way rather than having something up front, and I don't know quite how you would do that you know legally but 17 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 some kind of a memorandum of understanding or some kind of a commitment, more than just saying you know philosophically we agree. But I mean I understand moving on the project, and I very much support the school and I really have no other problems in what's been presented here other than I'm very concerned about the traffic impact and how that's going to play out down the road and I, if there was say that we could get a better commitment from the school in terms of helping us. Kate Aanenson: Well they are committed because they have to make these improvements. The commitment is, it's better to do it once and do it right, so there's a commitment there. I mean the horse is out of the bam because the school's going to open and these improvements have to be made so it's better to have that kind of being the catalyst to make everybody get to the table. Councilman Litsey: I mean not to be disagreeable but it's going to be a lot cheaper just to do the improvements that are in here than a $10 million road project. Todd Gerhardt: Well I think the school district is committed to, they have agreed verbally to us that they would contribute to the overall road improvements. It's a huge benefit to them to have that road completely upgraded, and so you know, you can call it an incentive but I think everybody's in agreement that they want to see the road done all in one and not piece meal it and put in temporary signals and have to tear them out a couple years later. So they are willing to contribute towards the cost of upgrading that road to a 4 lane. And would contribute significantly to that based on our past meetings that we've had with Steve and Superintendent Jennings. Councilman Litsey: Is there any way to add that in there, into this that... Kate Aanenson: Well I would just say this. If you look at what they're obligated to do, all the turn movements, all the improvements, that's a lot of the project. Some of it's outside of their control and that's where the nexus gets a little bit mushy because you've got Chaska across the street that's also providing a million square feet of industrial so, really what this does is says, you know this is moving forward and we need to be working together to get these problems. Todd Gerhardt: But Bryan brings up a good statement here and maybe we can put something in about dual tracking. That an either/or scenario and that you know, that the school negotiate in good faith if you decide to go with 4 lane road system and then if for some reason the school or the County and the City do not come to terms of a permanent solution for the road, then they would put in the temporary turn lanes and signals. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, we have some —in here, a condition to that. Councilman Litsey: Yeah, I think that would help a lot. Kate Aanenson: If you look on page 24. Here's what we have to date, and I can see where you want to modify that. Page 24. Under the Site Plan. Condition number 5. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by the opening day of school. The traffic signals. Again that's where I'm saying for them to do it twice, you know all those things have to be IV City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 implemented. So if you wanted to add under there, somewhere in there the language regarding working in good faith or. Councilman Litsey: I would just like to see something good, and the budgets get tight and later on you know, every dollar matters and I would just like to see a little stronger language in there without compromising or jeopardizing moving forward with the project. That there's an expectation that we'll do... Mayor Furlong: I know that there have been meetings, and I guess Steve Pumper is here, Director of Finance from the District and maybe we can hold off on suggesting language until we have a chance to hear from him too. Councilman Litsey: I'd be fine with that. Mayor Furlong: Any other questions for staff at this point? Give you an opportunity later, okay. How about the applicant? Mr. Pumper. Steve Pumper: Good evening. Thank you Mayor, Council members. Steve Pumper, Director of Finance and Operations with School District 112 and it's really exciting to be here again. We're almost there. Similar to the applicant for Heartland, we're ready to begin construction as well so, we hope things go well tonight. One thing before I forget, we'd certainly like to let council members know that the relationship between the school district, staff and it's partners and your staff members working here for the City of Chanhassen has been excellent. It's a great project that we're bringing forward. There's been great cooperation on both parts. We've listened to each other. We've listened to the residents in the area and we thanked them for their suggestions and I think the project has improved because of that. As a matter, I'll get straight up to the road issue. Councilman Litsey: Sorry. Steve Pumper: No, that's great. I actually before this is going to be brought up I wanted to let you know that probably was at least from the school district's point of view the biggest concern of the site today, right now, is what will Lyman look like. Ultimately certainly but what will it look like by the opening of school in the fall of 2009. We absolutely are committed to contributing to the construction of the improved Lyman Boulevard. We certainly believe, as I know your staff believes and I know the County shares the same opinion, and so does the City of Chaska, that it'd be foolish for the school district to spend money putting in these temporary improvements when those same dollars can be put towards the construction of a finished product that all parties want. So certainly we would be amenable to have some sort of language in there that we would contribute dollars towards that project. The difficult piece, you know to protect the school district's interest would be that we do not want to have to contribute the cost of putting in these temporary fixtures and turn lanes and signals, etc. and then have that same commitment towards you know rebuilding Lyman. I believe, as I believe the City Manager has the same feelings, this will get resolved and we will have construction on Lyman Boulevard so it is done where I'm going to say the right way the first time and I think that's the best interest of all the taxpayers, both in this city and in the district. The second item I'd like to address would be the 19 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 up lighting issue as well, and I'll tell you the same thing as I told the Planning Commission. This is not a life or death issue to the school district. We certainly will go ahead and build the building as you instruct us to build it regarding this issue. We believe however that it is going to be a fixture in the community. It's going to be a gathering place, not only for the residents of Chanhassen but certainly for the residents in District 112 as a whole. But I think we are planning, and are committed to building a building that citizens of Chanhassen are going to be proud of. It's going to be a community center and this is just one of those enhancements that will kind of make the building stand out. There's really two variances as I see it that Kate may have pointed out. One is, I believe the ordinance allows the United States flag to be up lit. And we have 3 flag poles out front. One would be for the United States flag. One would be for the State of Minnesota flag and one would be for the Chanhassen High School flag, which sounds like it's going to be a Chanhassen storm flag. So those, the three poles are right next to each other and it just makes sense to light all 3 of those, at least in our opinion that's what makes sense. The second piece is the fly loft over the theater. And that is again a very tall structure. It's made out of a material that will look like a sandstone. Very attractive and again it's just to light that, kind of as a beacon in the community. The Planning Commission and staff have proposed that it only be lit for events, and I think that's something that we could live with. Again it's just something that would show people as they drive by at night, hey here's the school. Here's the site that we're going to for the football game, for the basketball game, for a theater event, for a debate team, whatever it may be. I don't think it's obtrusive at all. And again it's not certainly required. It's not functional as far as what's going to happen for the building, so well go out as you see fit, as that goes. We just think it would really help to accentuate the building as a whole. This building is being constructed as a 50 plus year building. I mean we expect it to be here a long time and we expect to have thousands upon thousands of people go through it. So we're just trying to make it as nice a place as we can. With that being said, I have staff here as well, if you have any technical questions I certainly can't answer, there's some people here who can certainly answer those if you have questions regarding our application. And again, thanks for your time. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Pumper? Councilman Peterson: Yeah, maybe just the engineers talking about the retaining walls again. Jay Pomeroy: Jay Pomeroy with Anderson -Johnson Associates. I'm a landscape architect. Can you pose the question... Councilman Peterson: ... where I talked about where on the site. Jay Pomeroy: It can, and to be honest, that's a wall that is certainly very visible from the neighborhood and as you drive westerly on Lyman. For that reason we're using the big block. I don't know if we got into that a little bit but the larger sized block so it's got the structure and stability look to it. We've moved it away from the curb edge a good distance so that there is a comfort level as you're driving down that road. The only, the two concerns, maybe it's even just one, is the impact to the wetland. There's a wetland finger that actually comes in from Bluff Creek and actually turns way up in here. We will maintain that part of the finger and just interrupt but there'll be an infill box culvert under there for, not only for flowage but also if biology classes want to go down there and search around or pass under. There's that avenue, but 20 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 as we get further out it impacts more of the wetland and that would be my only concern, but it's certainly something we can pump out. Councilman Peterson: So reflect on my comment, again I'm not an expert on retaining walls. I've become more knowledgeable than I wanted to over the last 20 years but it seems to me that if you did terrace it, you'd have less sheet drain off of, if you had two moderate sized walls, one draining into a vegetation area that would seep down to the ground from there, versus all of it sheet draining and pushing off of the 20 some foot wall going right down into the wetlands. Jay Pomeroy: Well we have to treat it no matter what. It's, the water, basically the high point is at the road and most of the water flows down. There's a low point just about in here, if I recall. This water's picked up and it goes via storm sewer into this basin. So all the water that falls on the hard surface pavements has to be conveyed to a storm basin where it's filtered in kind of a pre-treatment area for Carver County and MPS permit requirements, and it's cleaned before it's discharged to the wetland. Any water that falls either on the wall or inside, well I should say inside the wall is going to flow back and into that storm sewer. The water that falls outside the wall obviously flows down and into the wetland. So we are cleaning whatever water falls on our. Councilman Peterson: So that being said, you're saying there is nothing going into the wetland, then why would it not be logical that we could terrace it and have no affect? I'm just playing devil's advocate here. Jay Pomeroy: The only affect would be is that we're filling more wetlands. We're not putting any more water, and the water that we would treat, perhaps if you put a rain garden into terraces, would only be treating what falls into it. Councilman Peterson: We're already mitigating some of that wetland now, so again I'm not saying we ... but we're mitigating some of it, because we're encroaching on it, so we could terrace the wall and mitigate additional. Should we want to do that. Jay Pomeroy: Yeah, but I don't know. The mitigation there wouldn't count. I don't know that the mitigation would be more in storm water management than wetland mitigation. We would have to, if we took more wetland here, that mitigation would have to go over here where we're adding to the wetlands. Here where we're adding to the wetlands, or here. That wouldn't, if we made application, that wouldn't be an approved mitigation area. Councilman Peterson: Okay. Well again the only reason I'm saying that is that, that is a really big wall. That's a really visual wall. Even though we're using bigger brick, it's still a brick wall and I think that I'd be interested in looking at alternatives to whatever we can do, within reason, without endangering you know the environment to do what's right for... Jay Pomeroy: For me, and I certainly understand and I'm sensitive to that. For me it's aesthetics. It's completely aesthetics and perhaps that's where you're going. To break up that height to just make it feel, not so much less high but just structurally better or to break up the vision with landscaping or what have it, there is something to be said for that. Now, keep in mind too that at 21 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 each end it tapers from zero and then it, the widest point, or the deepest point I should say, that's where it's the highest is right at that point where it's 25-26 feet. And it slopes up. Steve Pumper: ...using some vegetation. Jay Pomeroy: Oh yeah, there's going to be vegetation on the bottom that will soften it. Councilman Litsey: What kind of vegetation are you planning on putting in there? Jay Pomeroy: It's going to be some fairly fast growing plants. Aspen. Silver maple. You know the native species. This whole site is really, our intent is to put in prairie grasses and native vegetation, especially at the base between the Bluff Creek, the wetland and our design site, is to keep it very natural All native plants. Fairly fast growing plants. Councilman Litsey: At the base of those walls, that will break it up. Jay Pomeroy: Yeah. Some. Councilwoman Ernst: Can you tell me how far that wall is from the curb? Jay Pomeroy: From the curb here over? Councilwoman Ernst: Yep. Jay Pomeroy: It's about 8 feet. So from here to. Kate Aanenson: ...the other thing was to put plantings on top growing down also. Councilman Litsey: Like vines or something? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: And I guess point of clarification because I know Councilman Peterson's still asking questions. Wall 5, which is in our plan, which I think is the one that runs the long way that you were pointing to. Sir, the green one there. The staff report says the maximum height of that is 10 feet. It was, I think is it Wall 2. It's the one right at Lyman there. Jay Pomeroy: This one here? Mayor Furlong: Just come in, yes sir. On the east side. That is, that's 22 feet. Jay Pomeroy: Yeah, we've eliminated this wall. The inside wall. This wall though yes, is again. Mayor Furlong: So Wall 1 is not existing anymore? Jay Pomeroy: Correct. Yep, it's been eliminated. 22 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Mayor Furlong: Okay, so how high is Wall 2 now? Is it the same? Jay Pomeroy: Same height. Again it goes from zero at each end and it, if you've seen the site, it falls fairly quickly, so again it's zero and zero, and falls fairly quickly down to that. Mayor Furlong: 22 feet? Jay Pomeroy: Yep. Mayor Furlong: Because well, Councilman Peterson why don't you keep going with questions. Councilman Peterson: No, I've said my piece about that wall. I think we should do -something. I don't know what it is but I think it's too big. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Other questions for staff then? Or follow up questions on this. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Well Kate the biggest part of the wall is where the sewer line is? Kate Aanenson: Well, I agree with the Mayor. That part is 10 feet. The biggest wall ... on that side is probably 17, which is the one that's closer... Mayor Furlong: And that's way up on the north side. Kate Aanenson: Correct. That one was terraced. Mayor Furlong: And so what is the break up of that? Jay Pomeroy: The intent there, being that we're really adjacent to those active areas. This is the shot put areas. The athletic events. The intent there is to, instead of a single wall height, to drop 3 feet. Put a 10 foot wide planter in there so that we have trees, evergreens, vines, what have you, and then drop down the balance of the height, and again the reason for that is that as you're throwing or as you're playing out in the field, you just don't feel like it's a deep drop. There is some softening there. There is some feel of security there. This length again, I really don't at all, but that's a drive and it's not an active or a passive walk. There certainly is, on this side, the sidewalk on this side but you don't have the kids out there playing. There is guardrail on both sides, and a fence on both sides. For security. Mayor Furlong: And I guess the question is then along that drive, and that's where the buses will be. That's the bus drive, correct? Jay Pomeroy: Yep. Mayor Furlong: You know again while it may not be from a softening from a use standpoint, it's the visual aspect and that's what you said. This will be very visible for anybody driving west bound on Lyman towards the site. Their view is going to be that wall. Now there are trees there 23 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 now. A number of those I'm sure are coming down to build the road and so, even that aspect won't be there. There'll be nothing really to break that up between where the water is down on the creek level and on up the 20 some odd feet to the top. Kate Aanenson: Can Ijust clarify? ...this one's the 10 foot... Mayor Furlong: And the trees in the sub -station, yes. That's my expectation. Kate Aanenson: And we're hoping that architecturally, yeah. So the one that's going to be visible at the highest is the one that... while this one's only 10 feet. So we're hoping that the landscaping... and the next tallest. Councilman Peterson: Right by the entrance then. Kate Aanenson: Correct. And that one's gone. Mayor Furlong: On the east side of there. Councilman Peterson: That's probably the most visible one there. Or two. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, as you're coming down Lyman, this is actually. Mayor Furlong: But is that an interior wall? Kate Aanenson: Correct, it's not interior. It's going the other way. Mayor Furlong: So is the road there on the top of the wall or the bottom of the wall? Jay Pomeroy: Top of the wall. Mayor Furlong: Top of the wall, so that wall is facing in. Kate Aanenson: Yep. Mayor Furlong: By that drive. It's facing in by the bus drive. Just kids park in there. That's Wall 3. Wall 3 and Wall 4 are facing in towards the sub -station property? Kate Aanenson: Internal. Mayor Furlong: Internal. Jay Pomeroy: That's incorrect. This wall is as high as the inside. Maybe it's a little bit ... but that's not 10 feet high. Kate Aanenson: If you look at this one, you can see on the grading plan itself. 24 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Mayor Furlong: So that whole stretch along there is the 20-25 feet? Jay Pomeroy: Again it tapers down so it's widest or highest right at that low spot there. You know it may be 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and then it tapers back up. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Other questions for staff, or for the applicant? Councilwoman Ernst: Is this just a plain brick wall? Is there anything that's going to be on the wall? I mean like. Jay Pomeroy: The largest block will be stained. It's actually a, it's going to be complimentary to the building. It's not gray. It's not tan. It's actually kind of a dual color. And it again will be complimentary to the building. It will also have vines and the landscaping in front of it, but I'd hate to do banding or something that makes it that much more apparent. Councilman Litsey: So is it a stamped concrete stain then or is it? Jay Pomeroy: Basically they're formed. You know the form is actually a little bit bigger than this table, and that has kind of a rock face or kind of a, you know like a cliff, or you know a rock face to it, and then it has a color included into the concrete and then it's also stained after the fact and sealed. Todd Gerhardt: So it's a similar product that they're using on 101 north of Highway 7. That project, have you seen? Jay Pomeroy: You know I'm not sure Todd. The most, the closest I can get, I just drove here from Chaska. It's at the, I hesitate to say Home Depot because it's not the Home Depot wall, but it's the sign, you know it's the sign that has Home Depot I think right at the comer of Pioneer and 41. It looks very rock like. It's very natural. Councilman Litsey: It has a nice look. Actually on County Road 19 in the Shorewood-Tonka Bay area there's a rather large, is that the size you're talking about? Jay Pomeroy: Yeah. Councilman Litsey: And it is fairly attractive. Mayor Furlong: Other questions for the applicant. Lighting. I don't know if that's you too or if that's someone else. Councilwoman Ernst: I did have some more questions on this. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilwoman Ernst: And maybe this is more of a question for Kate. Well actually it is more a question for you. Have you checked with the neighboring, with the neighbors around in that area 25 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 to find out if that lighting would be offensive or has anyone checked with the neighbors in that area to find if that might be offensive to them? Steve Pumper: We only did through the illustrations that we had the night of the open house, and then there were some neighbors here at the Planning Commission we talked about it and their comments, which I think you have in your packet, were that they would not find that offensive. Again most of the lighting would be seen from Lyman Boulevard. It's not, we're lighting up the whole building. We're just lighting up the, you know the one, the front part of the school. So no one has come forward to us to say that it'd be offensive, and there were residents who were here that night. Mayor Furlong: I guess a question I have, and maybe it's incorporated in there. Maybe it's not. What are the, rather than just up lighting, flood lighting the wall, what are the options that are available? Obviously down lighting is what is allowed in the ordinance. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, some of the people do soffit lighting. Put it in the overhang. Mayor Furlong: Yep. And or, are there lights, can they be effectively shielded to, what are the options rather than just going forward with blanket up lighting? So let's start with that. What are the other options besides what you're proposing? Steve Pumper: Can I answer one of those? Mayor Furlong: Yeah. Answer any you want. Steve Pumper: That's fine. The down lighting, which would be an option, it'd be a little bit different effect but you know could be done. The issue is that for us is strictly a maintenance issue. There's no way to change the bulbs if you have down lighting, at the top of the fly loft. ] mean you're talking about a structure that is Paul, do you know how many feet in the air? 30 feet? 30 feet higher than the roof and there's no access point to there so, it's strictly a maintenance issue for us to have down lighting. If down lighting were to be the option, we would not have lighting on it. We just would pull it. As far as the shielding goes, I believe the lighting that we have proposed right now would be effectively shielded. It's very controlled. Again it's just on the fly loft of the, above the theater. Kate Aanenson: ...submitted detailed plans that they would show us the point of projection, the cut off and so we would review that with the building plans to make sure it ... met that criteria... Mayor Furlong: Is that doable? Is it effective to use directional shielding to light only the wall and not have the spillage over either on the sides or above? Alright. And I guess the question on, or the issue that came up through the Planning Commission was what activities around going on. That's fairly vague to me and I guess the question I would have is how often at the current high school district, how often are there evening activities? Steve Pumper: The short answer is all the time. 26 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Mayor Furlong: Yeah, that's what I thought. That's what I thought so it's not much. Steve Pumper: And right now again, for those members who are familiar with Chaska High School, this would be somewhat similar to having, for lack of a better word, the dome over the commons there that is lit all the time. That kind of is a beacon at that school so to speak. While it's not up lighting on the exterior of the building, it's certainly up lighting as far as if you're flying over, you're going to see a lot of light coming out of that because it's just a glass dome over the center of the building. That certainly is lit really every evening. We would again, we're amenable to whatever you want us to do, as far as how often you want it lit. For what special events you would qualify. If there is, if you believe it's a hindrance later on, you know we could control it to a certain degree. Again it's not a make or break. We just think that you will like it as much as well like it. I don't want to force your opinion on this. Mayor Furlong: But you're willing to try to sway us. Is there anything besides this one wall then Mr. Pumper? I thought it said the walls around the front. Steve Pumper: No. Kate Aanenson: The three flags. Steve Pumper: The three flags and fly loft. I'm not sure Kate actually what you were showing. Our intention is not to have up lighting on any other part of the building. Mayor Furlong: What would you use for lighting there? Just down lighting. Steve Pumper: Down lighting, right. Kate Aanenson: We just showed the light fixtures that were... Steve Pumper: Right. Those would just be yeah, regular spot light, down lighting. So this is the only section are the three flag poles, one of them which you do allow by ordinance. And then the fly loft. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Okay, other questions for the applicant? Council members, did you have anything else? Councilwoman Ernst: No, thank you. Mayor Furlong: Anyone else? Okay. We did offer to take some public comment so at this point I would invite any parties, Mrs. Lloyd, you had some comments or questions. Deb Lloyd: You did a nice job covering some of the items that I was concerned about Bryan, thank you for bringing up the traffic information. I know the community voted for the high school. It's a foregone conclusion that it's going to be approved. It's a very challenging site to be working with and so you have a lot of items to be concerned about. The traffic is a huge, huge concern. 900 cars coming in a half an hour in the morning. In addition you have the students 27 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 that are going to Chaska High School. My kids have traveled those roads there. They've been out of school now for 4 years but traffic accidents occur continually there. I don't know what the present numbers but when I ran for council earlier this fall, in October, there were already 40 some accidents on the way to Chaska High School. If these roads are not improved concurrently with this building we are asking for our youth to be hurt. And I really believe that is wrong. I don't think it's wise to have a gentleman's agreement on this. I think this school and the county and the city need to come to a common understanding when that road is going to be improved. Who's going to pay for it because in the long run the kids are going to pay for it if it's not done correctly. And budgets, you know what budgets are like. Do we have the money in our budget plan for that? Does the County? Does the School Board? Probably not. Those are also coming from our pockets so that is really, really a huge concern. With the demographics not measuring up to the projections, do we need to rush it this week? Maybe you need to take time to step back and to come to a written agreement with all parties. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. The City, County and School District have had numerous meetings over many, many months with regards to Lyman and I know Mr. Gerhardt, you have been involved in all of those meetings. That is something that is in progress. It's not something that we just said oh, maybe we should upgrade this road. Give us a little bit of background on where you are on that and some of the activities that have taken place and it involves the City of Chanhassen, City of Chaska, Carver County and School District 112, so we've got four entities that my understanding is they're working pretty well together, moving towards some conclusions. But Mr. Gerhardt, perhaps you could comment a little more. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, as I stated earlier that right now were at the point where we need to get a Request for Proposal out to get engineers to come in and give us a true estimate of the cost to upgrade that segment of roadway from basically Audubon north in Chanhassen, over to Galpin and you know we've used some tentative numbers and it seemed as if everybody was kind of in agreement with that. I need to bring it back to you, and I think I've got it scheduled here in the next couple weeks to bring something back to the City Council so you know kind of where we're heading on this. I was hoping that the county would have some truer numbers so I could come back and not say whoops, we were wrong by 30% on road costs. You know I want to come back with real numbers for you is why I haven't scheduled this earlier. But I think everybody's working in good faith and I can appreciate that, the comments tonight. The reason we are considering this now is to keep the school district's construction schedule, which is very tight, on schedule and if we're going to hold this up to wait to see the numbers on the road, you know it's not going to work and so, unfortunately we have to go on some good faith comments here and, you know this is something that I've been working on for 6 years with the county and the City of Chaska and we're finally making some headway on it so I'm very comfortable in bringing back something that I think the City Council can support in the near future. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Any other public comments this evening? Okay, thank you. Deb Lloyd: Just one side bar. Mayor Furlong: If you can come up to the mic, just so we record it at home. M City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Deb Lloyd: With the 2005 MUSA study, I thought, and you know this is cobwebs mind, but I didn't think that we could have additional development until the roads were improved. Cobwebs again, but I think that study, there was the implication of that. And so I don't know, is it premature? I guess that's my question. Todd Gerhardt: I can comment to that. What needs to be done as a part of the 2005 MUSA was that you needed additional turn lanes in certain locations. It did not call for Lyman to be upgraded to 4 lanes. Only at those intersections where there would be traffic signals would you need 4 lanes, and I keep, you know a good example would be Pioneer where the current high school is. It's a rural 2 lane road with right turn lanes and signals. Even Minnetonka's is even narrower than that and so, you know Lyman ultimately needs to be 4 lanes down the road, but right now based on the growth of 2005 MUSA, it would just need to have 4 lanes at the intersection of Lyman and Audubon, and turn lanes into Audubon and onto new Powers. But it would not need to be upgraded to 4 lanes right away. Kate Aanenson: And that's just to be clear ... so whether the road goes forward or not, they will make the safety improvements as required in the Environmental Assessment document so it can open safely, and that's the goal... The goal is not to duplicate... Mayor Furlong: With the progress that's being made by the various government entities, if that is successful in moving forward and we get a project that's feasible and approved by all the entities, then the improvements that are listed here, those funds can be put towards making the improvements permanent and doing a permanent improvement right from the start. That is everybody's goal, right? I heard that tonight from the school district and certainly that's our goal and I know the County and others involved would want the same thing. To your point, if for some reason that falls off track, these improvements have to be made, but they would be made quote, on a temporary basis and we all know how long temporary can be. But it would be made such that it would meet the traffic demands for the site. So that the objective here is to upgrade Lyman and make these improvements necessary for safe access to the site to do it once on a permanent basis, so that's what everybody's intention is. Is to do. Councilman Litsey: ... to those discussions but is the timing could be right to do it, the total upgrade in time for the opening of the school? Todd Gerhardt: It's going to be darn close. Councilman Litsey: It's going to be tight. Todd Gerhardt: It's going to be close but you know, the goal is to try to get it there in the fall of 2009, but we've had situations where the following year you finish up some other parts. You get the key areas done, and then finish up some of the other areas later on. So will you have that whole segment completed? Probably not but that's the task that Paul has at hand. To figure out how to phase and stage the development of that road. Councilman Litsey: Because my, I mean the concerns that have been articulated here but the number one financially there's concerns but more importantly safety and I think there's no doubt 29 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 that it'd be safer if the whole upgrades went in at one time rather than piecemealing it. I mean that's hardly a guess but, and then on the financial end of it, and I'm concerned about that so, I still would like to see some, at a minimum, some language in there to tighten up the commitment from the school district to financially supporting the total improvement. Mayor Furlong: Well, and Paul correct me if I'm wrong. When we talk about some of the improvements, the, if we upgrade Lyman, some of the improvements listed here are turn lanes. Those turn lanes would be put in next to the permanent upgrade rather than next to the existing pavement, so, and similar to most developments, if we had another development along Lyman that was looking for expanded access or something, the developer would be required to put those in, is that? Paul Oehme: That's correct, at his cost. Mayor Furlong: A city standard, at their cost. So I guess the way I read this, and I believe I was right, was that these are improvements that need to be made on Lyman. Now if we can upgrade Lyman and do these improvements at the same time, we might have some cost savings, some efficiencies for doing it but bottom line, they're going to be paying for these types of improvements. Kate Aanenson: All the improvements are their responsibility to make their site work. That's what they need to do ... so those improvements are their responsibility. Todd Gerhardt: And whatever their commitments you know dollar wise to put those in are similar to the ones that would go with the prominent structure. There's not a huge cost difference between the temporary and a permanent. That's the sad thing to say. You'd think it would be cheaper to put temporary in, but the time you put those signals in, you've got to put loop detectors in and you can't re -use those. Same thing with the signals. You've got to put up cedar poles and put the temporary signals, you're at the same price basically as what the permanent costs would be. So it's not like they're going to go spend more money on athletic fields and not on the signals because they're going to have to put money towards the temporaries so, and they've got to put that in their budget. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other questions for the applicant? Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Just one real quick uncomplicated question. When the school opens, is it going to be like maxed out with students or is it going to be a trickling? Steve Pumper: We expect in 2009 to have roughly 1,500 students at Chanhassen High School and it's going to be built for 2,000, so 75%. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other questions? If not, let's bring it to discussion. Nobody else from the public? No more public comments? Alright, thank you and thank you for all who came to the Planning Commission meeting, to get your comments on the record there. We appreciate that as well. Council members, comments, thoughts, discussion. Councilwoman Ernst. 30 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Councilwoman Ernst: Mayor, are we charged with making this motion this evening on, is it four different motions that we're supposed to be making or is it one? Mayor Furlong: It's my understanding we have four different items before us, but it's the same development. It's on, so there's a zoning change that's being requested. There is a site plan. The alteration permit, or excuse me, wetland mitigation, and then a fourth one as well. Councilman Peterson: It starts on 201. Mayor Furlong: 201 of the electronic file. Page 23 of the staff report. Councilwoman Ernst: I was confused because the recommendation on this was different than what it's showing on here. Mayor Furlong: Other thoughts and discussion on the overall project or issues we've discussed this evening or that were discussed at the Planning Commission meeting. Councilman Peterson: Mr. Mayor, I'd be happy to start. I've already articulated my thoughts on the retaining walls. I think that if we can creatively do anything and everything to mitigate the size and the over powering nature of any of those walls, particularly the ones on the entrance which I think are the ones that we focused on mostly tonight. You've already done some of that on the northern part of the site and if we can do more of that, without substantially interfering with the ecological nature of that area, you know I'd like to potentially increase the variance to do that. Now I think that both from a visual, and I think from a safety standpoint, you know when you get high retaining walls in an area where kids are driving, that kind of scares me so if I can maybe save some car accidents and maybe go into the wetland a little bit, I'm willing to arm wrestle over that. So that being said, the other I think contentious issue potentially is the lighting. I have a different perspective on that, and I was part of the team that kind of put together the ordinance on that and part of it really is, it's, we as a city have taken a stand about visual light pollution and it really is light pollution that we originally had talked about is that any time you put lights into the air, it is by some definition, by my definition pollution. It is, is it nice? Does it look nice? Absolutely. But as a public sector entity, I wouldn't vote for it if the City Hall wanted to do that because it truly is our ordinance. As another public entity, I think we have to have a higher standard and now we're kind of moving away from that. ...let's maintain a higher standard for ourselves and not do that for all the right reasons. You look around at the towns on a cloudy night, you can see exactly where the towns are, and that's kind of what we're talking about is we're trying to lessen that. All across America and if we can do it in a small way here, it may seem insignificant but we have to start somewhere. And you started with the ordinance and so I wouldn't support a variance for that for those reasons. Other than that, you know obviously architecturally it's a wonderful building and it's a wonderful laid out site and a very difficult site, just by looking at the number of retaining walls that's there. I looked at that and went holy cow and you know, so that being said I think we've done an exceptional job of integrating a lot of interesting site variations and architectural designs into a very, very difficult site so, with those comments I pass it on. 31 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Councilwoman Tjomhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Well I can't speak for everyone here but I have a feeling this is the one and only time I'll be voting for a high school, and so I think it's kind of a special time for me tonight knowing that. And I think it's really a positive night for our town. So much I think of a person's high school years gravitate to where you came from. I mean they'll ask you whered you graduate from high school. I could say I graduated from Kennedy because I came from Kennedy. Our kids in Chanhassen can't say that right now. They say other towns and so I think it's wonderful that soon they'll be able to say Chanhassen, and really a high school can be the heartbeat of a community. I think it brings people together and it creates a gathering site, a public place for many different activities and so I think it's a positive thing. The Planning Commission was concerned about the giving and taking with the Bluff Creek Overlay District and that I think also where the school is, is a positive thing because I think maybe, and don't quote me but that could possibly be the cheapest classroom they'll have in the whole school will be that Bluff Creek. I think it will be an excellent opportunity for educating kids about the environment and maintaining it and the environmental impacts that can happen, if things are not properly taken care of so I think it's a positive factor that the high school is where it is. I think they kind of took a round peg and trying to fit into a square hole and somehow with that site they did it. I think it works, except for the retaining walls, that will probably do it I think with retaining walls but, other than that with the lighting, I agree with Craig that as a council I think we've tried to really be firm with up lighting with anything else that's come in. And you mentioned Lifetime, I don't know if they were, they were not given up lighting either. So I think we do have to maintain our standards with that and it is a beautiful building and it will be a monumental building in our city, but I'm going to support staff recommendation to not have the up lighting on the building. Other than that, I look forward to voting on it. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilwoman Ernst. Councilwoman Ernst: I agree with Councilwoman Tjornhom in the fact that it's an exciting event for us to be voting on this this evening. I'm struggling with the retaining wall a bit just because it is such a big block of stone, and if there is a way that we could soften that, that would be great. The up lighting on the other hand I'm taking a different stance on that. I think we have an ordinance in place. However, I do think that based on what they've come back with today, they've talked about putting the reflective lighting in, in an effort to try and compromise on that. I feel that they've been good at trying to work with us on that. So I would actually support the up lighting. And beyond that, I'm looking forward to voting on it. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Councilman Litsey. Councilman Litsey: Yeah, I share in the excitement. I think a lot of people worked really hard to make this work and I commend everybody's efforts. This was a difficult site to work with and it's really going to showcase the city of Chanhassen. Give us an identity beyond what we have already. The pride aspect of it and those kind of things certainly too. I think we should try to do what we can with the retaining walls, although I see what you can do with form lighters and stain and I think it's fairly attractive and I think that it will look okay personally, but anything we could do to mitigate the effect of that through plantings or whatever would be helpful and maybe 32 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 we could work towards that. You know this is truly a showcase for Chanhassen. I don't have a problem deviating a little bit on the lighting. It's pretty modest deviation. Most of it has to do with some extra flags, which is a good thing to light those. And the other has to do with a small section just to give it some character and I don't see anyone objecting to it that lives in the area. I think it will actually, like I said, showcase it better. I sound like a broken record on the next thing but I really am concerned about the roads there. Ideally it would have been nice if the roads could have been upgraded a little quicker to coincide with the school district's wanting to put a, or the school district's wanting to put a school building there. I wasn't part of that so I'm coming in here after the fact so I'm trying to do what I can to at least facilitate the fact that that will happen, so I'd still like perhaps I should ask the city attorney. I'm not saying legally binding language but something just to memorialize the fact that we want to, we are all committed towards moving as quickly as possible towards completing those road improvements beyond just what's being stated in here, and maybe just a simple sentence will do that. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Couple questions on the lighting issue, and on the retaining walls. What of the, well let me ask council this question. There were two issues with regard to lighting. One is the flags. Our ordinance allows the American flag, and they're going to have two other flags there. Is there a sense that allowing the variance on the up lighting for the two additional flag poles is okay or is not okay? Councilman Peterson: My point was for the building. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So you are okay with the flag poles? With the additional flag poles? Councilwoman Tjomhom: It's not my issue at all. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. So the issue is basically the wall. Or the, I'm sorry. Steve Pumper: Fly loft. Councilwoman Ernst: What'd he say? Steve Pumper: Fly loft. Mayor Furlong: Fly loft. Kate Aanenson: Can you point to that Steve... Mayor Furlong: Do you have a picture of the sight line? Todd Gerhardt: The screen for the movies in the theater area. It's the high bay area. Mayor Furlong: Do you have an elevation that we can see that? Do you have an elevation or something that shows that? Steve Pumper. There was, it was on your web site. 33 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Todd Gerhardt: It's this portion of the building that doesn't really lay it out well but this is the fly loft. Mayor Furlong: Can you zoom in on that? Todd Gerhardt: There it is. Steve Pumper: It's right here. So this sandstone color right there. So you've got the 3 flags. Again this wall right here. Mayor Furlong: And what other lighting on the outside of the building is going to occur? You said there's going to be down lighting. Steve Pumper: Yeah you'll see, and here's the cafeteria so you'll see, and this is all glass, so you'll see lighting. Through tiered lighting coming out... and all the rest of the lighting will be down lighting. Here again you would have the lights would be on the face of the wall and they'd be angled upwards. Again what I was telling you before, if you had a similar effect of having the light coming from down, it's just again being able to get up to that point to actually access the bulbs. Mayor Furlong: There's no access ladder available to do that? Councilman Peterson: But you're lighting a straight, 100% flat wall. Mayor Furlong: There's no fagade that comes out to cut it off? Steve Pumper: It's a textured wall but I mean. Todd Gerhardt: You've got a sample of the material that. Kate Aanenson: ...cut off so. Mayor Furlong: And how effective can you do that? How effectively? Kate Aanenson: Well there's two. One for the light fixture itself... stops at the top of the roof line. Todd Gerhardt: Or you point the light down 2 or 3 feet from the top of the wall. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Well I guess, backing up here a little bit. There's comments made tonight about how, this is a long time coming. I think Mr. Pumper made that comment and I agree, it is a long time coming. I'm glad we're here where we are. There have been a number of residents over the years that have been waiting for last fall's referendum to be asked and for the school to be named Chanhassen High School, which has taken place, and now we're at this stage. I think it is important that we keep the process moving forward. I think this is one of those cases, 34 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 and especially with regards to Lyman where we can't wait til all the lights are green before we back out of the driveway, and we've been backing out of the driveway and moving forward and I think that's one that we're going to have to work on. Fortunately I think the parties are working together well and we'll be able to do that and we can talk a little bit more I guess about that if we need to but overall, there have been a lot of people involved, as Councilman Litsey has said. A number of residents and staff and school board and the city and over the years, people that we aren't even aware of that were involved that contributed in some way to bringing forward this Chanhassen High School tonight, and it will be a very nice addition. I'm glad with how I've seen the school district and the city staff work together to get us here and this has been really the culmination of commitments made and commitments kept over the years and that's great for all of us to see. Unfortunately with all these cases we get into some details that seem to muck it up a little bit when you're trying to keep it a bigger picture and let's not lose sight of the bigger picture here, but we've got a couple details we do have to address. With regard to the lighting, I'm very torn on this one, as is the rest of the council, which is clear. My concern is, as much as try to shield and such, which would be I guess a preference, in the end what we're doing is we're lighting a wall and while it will provide some architectural appearance, you know even the restriction that it be done during school activities, it's effectively we're doing it all the time. So I'm concerned that, with regard to doing that and what, whether or not that can be done as effectively as we'd want it to be done, without the overflow on the sides. I guess I'm not comfortable there yet and I don't know how to get comfortable here and I don't know that lighting up a wall or not lighting up the wall with up light is worth the entire site plan, and I know it's not an issue for the school district but it's an architectural feature they were looking at. Clearly I'm comfortable with lighting the flags and all three flag poles. I think that's a reasonable request. The retaining walls, I m very much agree with Councilman Peterson on the retaining walls, especially the ones along that bus driveway. The road coming off of Lyman, where Audubon comes north, at that intersection. I think we need to look to break those walls up somehow and realize there might be some encroachment into the wetland but I think from a visual standpoint, as much as we talk about visual appearance of the building, that's going to be a, we've got a 22, or 20 to 25 foot wall, starting at 0 and going up and down along there, I think breaking it up. And the wall I always think about is the wall by the parking lot over at St. Hubert's Church. That's a very high wall. I'm not sure what the height is, but it's terraced twice and just by doing that, planting some trees halfway and allowing some bushes to be there, you drive in there and you don't have a sense of there's a huge wall there, but it's there and I think the terracing helps break that up. So I don't know how we do that from a condition standpoint. I would be in favor of making sure that we do something there, whether it's a condition or whether that's something, and I'm sure staff understands, sorry, the council, we can get something done there. Whether it's to work with staff from, and I'm open to other ideas Councilman Peterson or others. Kate Aanenson: For clarification... There is, I heard you say the.. Mayor Furlong: Between the curb and the top of the wall. Can we use some of that? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I think we can. My concern is that is there's additional wetland impact... 35 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Roger Knutson: Obviously if there's additional wetland impact, you might have to come back with additional wetland mitigation. Go through that process, and I guess that wouldn't hold things up very much, considering how long this project's going to take to build out so. Councilwoman Tjomhom: But will that incur extra costs? Mayor Furlong: Sure. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I mean we're talking about public dollars here so it's not. Kate Aanenson: I think... Mayor Furlong: I want to see what the options are I guess along that walk. Kate Aanenson: If there's some room up on top... Mayor Furlong: And I understand there are some restrictions on what options there might be. Kate Aanenson: Such as the location of the sewer line, but we can look at all those depending on ... we'll have to come back with that. Roger Knutson: Maybe the best thing you can do under the circumstances is direct council, excuse me, direct staff to look at all reasonable possibilities of terracing the retaining walls or reducing them in height. I guess you can't reduce them in height. Through terracing or breaking up the impact of them. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I'm comfortable with that too as long as like it's not going to cost huge amounts of money. I think that like I said, we are spending our citizen's money on a building and if it's you know better to lessen the impact on the environment and keep the retaining wall and keep a budget, or otherwise going into wetland mitigations and costing more financially, I think we should also look at that and not just what it looks like. Roger Knutson: How about if I put in the word reasonable? Councilwoman Tjomhom: And that's okay. Reasonable and financial are okay Mayor Furlong: Would that be a condition then or just. Roger Knutson: Staff direction I think that would be. Mayor Furlong: Staff direction to work with staff on that. Okay. Alright. And I think that's what we need to do. I don't think we know what all the options are there yet and so I think working with staff to look at reasonable options I think makes sense. On the, I guess getting back to the up lighting, our last issue there, unless other people have ideas there, if it's, my sense would be to follow the ordinance, unless we can gain some comfort, some options that could come back which would give us solid comfort in terms of mitigating the reason that the 36 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 ordinance is in place. Mitigating or eliminating the reason the ordinance is in place which is, that there be no, if there's a lighting scheme that could be utilized that would have the same illumination effects as down lighting, because I think that to Councilman Peterson's point, talked about why we have that ordinance in place. And that's to reduce, even down lighting is going to have some reflective lighting off the building. That's the whole purpose of it so is there a lighting scheme that allows the equivalent from an illumination standpoint. Kate Aanenson: But I guess the onus would again be back to the applicant to submit it to staff, a drawing that we could share with you that we felt met the requirement. Councilman Litsey: Couldn't we do the same thing we're doing with the retaining wall? Kate Aanenson: Right. I just, just for again point of clarification ... but they need to go back through the process and ask for a variance separately and go back to the Planning Commission. think the Planning Commission already told them that we don't want to do that process. We want to keep it open ended... that's why I'm asking for a point of clarification just to say. Mayor Furlong: How we do that. Kate Aanenson: Exactly. Mayor Furlong: Yes. No, I don't want to have to go through another variance request. Roger Knutson: As I understand it, you're, not to put words in your mouth. Mayor Furlong: Please do. Roger Knutson: Maybe that's what I was going to do but I didn't feel right about it. I was trying to you know. You're denying the variance unless the applicant can come back and demonstrate to the City Council that the light will be cut off on the sides and on the top in such a way as not to cause light pollution. Is that about it? Mayor Furlong: That's approximately it, yes. And I don't know how to better describe than he just did but I think that's the point. If the ordinance is there to prevent the light pollution, is there a mechanism of lighting that wall so that it meets their maintenance requirements because of the physical structure of the building? But I do not want this to go back through another request. I mean can we keep this, how do we do this? Roger Knutson: You can flip it over. The easiest thing to do to make it clean, if you're comfortable with this, let's say approve the variance, however. Mayor Furlong: Subject to Roger Knutson: Yeah. However the lights must not pollute upward, above the top of the fly wall or to the side of the fly wall. It must go straight up the fly wall and be contained within. 37 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Kate Aanenson: And more specifically submit a plan demonstrating that. Roger Knutson: Before it spills, and if you can do that, it's approved. Todd Gerhardt: It's something to stop 2 to 3 feet to the top of the fly loft. Councilwoman Ernst: So could we do that with the retaining wall as well? Or does that need to come back? Mayor Furlong: Well I think the retaining wall, they'll work with staff to look at all reasonable options there and come back. Roger Knutson: I think the retaining wall is much more difficult because we could, it's easy to say what you find objectionable to lighting. It's hard to design the retaining walls. Mayor Furlong: I guess to Councilman Peterson, Councilwoman Tjomhom, is that going to, if they can demonstrate a lighting scheme to staff and if we want to make it subject to council approval that it is done such that there is no spillage over or it doesn't create the light pollution that the ordinance is meant to restrict, would that be okay going forward with the language that Mr. Knutson just recommended? Councilman Peterson: Well my response to that question is probably, the answer is it'd be difficult because I think what you're. Mayor Furlong: I don't know if it's possible. Councilman Peterson: ...they'd have to bring the light you know 30 or 40 feet away from the wall and then you know shine at it to be assured that you haven't gone over the sides so you're going to kind of light the middle of the wall. Mayor Furlong: And I don't know if that's something they want to do or not but again, I don't know what the answer is. There's smarter people with lighting than I am on that. Councilman Peterson: Yeah and we've talked about this before Kate. If we can show that the dispersal of the light has been mitigated with the lumens, etc, etc, I mean it will substantially, be a substantially different look because you're, then you're not up lighting. You're front lighting it in a real soft way. Kate Aanenson: Right, I agree it's not just how it shines on there. It's the lumens that you're looking at when, distance away and ... intensity so it's going to take a couple different issues to address that so... Councilman Peterson: Again my goal isn't to make a big deal out of this. It's just, we have an ordinance in there for all the right reasons and I just don't think we should make an exception for another public entity when we're, unless we're trying to re -think our ordinance. The answer to In City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 your question, if they can creatively bring a solution that will meet the intent of the ordinance, then knock yourself out. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Have you been keeping track of these so we know where to put them in? Kate Aanenson: Yes. I think that's most clear... that's pretty clear. Mayor Furlong: Alright. Okay. So any other comments or discussion on this? Now we've hammered out those details. Let's get back to the goal at hand here which is considering approval of the new high school in Chanhassen. We have four motions beginning on page 23 of the staff report. Page 201 of the electronic file. Would somebody like to make a motion? Councilman Litsey: Can I just before we do that, is there some language that you came up with that would? Todd Gerhardt: Sure. If you want to add the language where the school district would participate in the Lyman Boulevard upgrade, I've got some language on that. I call it 5(a). In addition the School District shall participate in the cost of the upgrading of Lyman Boulevard on a fair or equitable basis based upon trip generation highlighted in the traffic impact study. Mayor Furlong: Please. Steve Pumper: That's creative Todd. I prefer it be more based on comparable costs associated with what's in the site proposal right now. Todd Gerhardt: Okay. Steve Pumper: The only reason I clarify that is because I don't, I truly don't know what we mean by saying based on trip generation. You know what that would ... for us. Todd Gerhardt: The only reason I put that in there was the trip generation study showed the need for the right turn lanes and the traffic signals. So you know we're using the information that was provided by your engineers. Not asking for you to pay for trails, curb, gutter or any of that, so. Councilman Litsey: And again this is just good faith. I don't know that it's legally binding. Councilman Peterson: Well yeah, that's to my point. If it's not binding anyway, what we're trying to do is get a message across and I think Bryan, I think you got the message across. Councilman Litsey: But then what's the harm of putting it in there? Councilman Peterson: Well you can't enforce it so I mean. Councilman Litsey: There's a lot of things that you can't necessarily enforce but it shows good faith and when people go back to look at what the intent of it was, it's in the document and it's easy to reference. k% City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Councilman Peterson: Yeah we try not to, at least I try not to put items in conditions that we can't enforce. Councilman Litsey: Well I would like something stronger than that but I'm willing to support something like this to at least show good faith... We're putting the cart before the horse somewhat in putting the school in before we have adequate roadways. I also understand that the school is on a time line. We need to get it in there. I support the project overall. I'm glad it's going in but I'm very concerned about cost impact to the City and what this might do down the road so I just would like some kind of a good faith. Councilwoman Tjornhom: And Todd, we are going to have a meeting about this regarding Lyman and all the parties, their input in trying to reach some sort of agreement, correct at another later date? Todd Gerhardt: Yeah. Councilwoman Tjomhom: This is a huge issue. Todd Gerhardt: If Steve has a problem with based upon trip generation, let's just take that out and highlight it in the traffic impact. Take that out. Just say in addition the school district shall participate in the cost of upgrading Lyman Boulevard on a fair and equitable basis, like I said earlier. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And I think just for clarification. As we're looking at the staff report with regard to the traffic to Councilman Litsey, condition number 5, and correct me if I'm wrong, lays out the conditions that are necessary because of the trips being generated by this site, to create safe roadways. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Now an upgrade of Lyman would be a better roadway but it's not, by going forward with this, with these conditions, we're creating a safe roadway. So saying it was unsafe, I don't know that that's. Councilman Litsey: Well I never said it was unsafe. I just said that arguably it's safer if you do the total upgrade. Than piecemealing. That's pretty self evident but. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilman Litsey: I just want something that you know we understand this is important. We need to move this along and I don't think it does any harm and I think it's a good way to show good faith on the part of the school district, and not binding them to anything. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Okay, with that would somebody like to take a shot at the motion? City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Councilwoman Tjomhom: The first one? Mayor Furlong: Why don't we start with the first one. Kate Aanenson: You can do all of them. Roger Knutson: You can combine all four in one motion. Mayor Furlong: I just want to make sure that we incorporate the modifications to any conditions so, do you want to start with A, Councilwoman Tjomhom? Councilwoman Tjomhom: I make a recommendation that the City Council adopVthe following, oops. I'm sorry, the Chanhassen City Council approves the Rezoning of the Chanhassen High School site from Agricultural Estate District (A2) and Planned Unit Development (PUD) or Office Industrial District (OI). Mayor Furlong: Okay. You want to keep going? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Yep. And then B. We're on B now, is that right? Mayor Furlong: Yes. Councilwoman Tjomhom: The Chanhassen City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek corridor with a variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary zone in conformance with the grading plans prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates dated 2-02-07, subject to the following conditions 1 through 10. Mayor Furlong: Yep, 1 through 2. Councilwoman Tjomhom: 2? Oh I'm sorry. 10's the next one? Mayor Furlong: I think so. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. Mayor Furlong: Yep, 1 through 2 on B. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay, 1 through 2. I'm sorry. Mayor Furlong: That's okay. Councilwoman Tjornhom: The Chanhassen City Council approves the Site Plan with Variance for a three story building and I don't know, do I want to put up lighting in there? Roger Knutson: Yes. And then you go onto the conditions. You're approving it subject to I believe. 41 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Councilwoman Tjornhom: Subject to conditions and for a high school campus including an approximately 406,000 square foot building, athletic fields, concession buildings, stadium, storage, maintenance buildings and parking lots, plans prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates dated 2-02-07, subject to the following conditions, and that's 1 through 10. Councilman Peterson: With the inclusion of i 1? Councilwoman Tjomhom: With the inclusion of 11. Which still would be up lighting? Mayor Furlong: And how do you want 11 to read? Councilwoman Tjomhom: How should it read? Councilman Peterson: Kate did you? Mayor Furlong: Did you write that down? Kate Aanenson: ...say the building fagade up lights shall be prohibited contingent upon meeting the intent of the lighting ordinance. Roger Knutson: Meeting the intent of it. Kate Aanenson: Yes, including the intent of the lighting, ordinance which is... Councilman Utsey: Are we also adding 5(a) or not? Mayor Furlong: Yep, just a minute. I want to get 3 here first. So 3 is being proposed to be modified to say the building fagade flood lights shall be allowed only. Kate Aanenson: Subject to meeting the intent of our lighting ordinance regarding spill off. I think that's the most clear. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And to who's discretion? Staffs or council's? To staffs discretion? Or staffs approval. Okay. Alright. So that's 3. Todd Gerhardt: Kate that was to include up, just during school events? Kate Aanenson: Correct. ...which is all the time. Mayor Furlong: I think, we're still in the middle of the motion here so I mean, the first suggestion was to meeting the ordinance intent. Subject to approval of staff. And then you want to put the period there? And then take off all that events, yep. Okay. Okay. So that's 3. Then there was a question on 5(a). Did you want? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Todd, what do you think our language should be for that? 42 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Todd Gerhardt: I don't think it hurts if you take out that based upon trip generation highlighted in the traffic impact. Mayor Furlong: So just read what you have. Todd Gerhardt: 5(a). In addition the School District shall participate in the cost of the upgrading of Lyman Boulevard on a fair and equitable basis. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Fair enough? Councilman Litsey: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: I have that written down Kate. Councilwoman Tjornhom: That's all written down and documented? Okay. Mayor Furlong: Alright. And then you said I I? Councilman Peterson: 11 is no longer. Councilwoman Tjornhom: 11 is no longer. Mayor Furlong: 11 was 3? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So it's conditions 1 through 10, 3 modified and 5(a) added. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Yep. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And then D. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Councilwoman Ernst will do it. Mayor Furlong: I'm sorry. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Councilwoman Ernst can do that. Mayor Furlong: Oh well. Councilwoman Tjornhom: You want me to keep going? Mayor Furlong: Yeah. You're still in the middle of the road... Councilman Peterson: I would like to go home tonight. 43 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Councilwoman Tjornhom: The Chanhassen City Council, I can read actually really fast. The Chanhassen City Council approves the Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on the site of the Chanhassen High School, plans prepared by Pinnacle Engineering dated February 9, 2007, subject to the following conditions 1 through 5. Mayor Furlong: Based upon the findings of fact in the staff report? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Of course. Based upon the findings of fact. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Kate Aanenson: Point of clarification? Mayor Furlong: Yes. We're still making a motion so. Kate Aanenson: We haven't added one on the retaining walls. Mayor Furlong: Is that 11, back to the site plan? Councilman Peterson: There you go. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So 11, back on the site plan which was Motion C. Did you have suggested language there? We might be done before school opens. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Is that one going to the Wetland Alteration Permit? Mayor Furlong: No. No, this is site plan. Because it's a site plan issue I believe. Kate Aanenson: ...alternative designs to reduce the impact of the retaining walls. Mayor Furlong: It was yeah, to look at reasonable possibilities. Kate Aanenson: Reasonable alternatives. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Retaining walls to reduce impact... Councilwoman Tjomhom: And that would come back to staff also? Kate Aanenson: Well share it with you... Mayor Furlong: Yeah. I think it's clear what the intention of the council was trying to achieve there so those would be the types of alternatives we'd be looking for, so that was number 11 M City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 under C. So we've got Motions A, B, and C with the conditions under C being modified on 3, 5(a) and 11 being added. Is there a second? Councilwoman Ernst: Second. Okay, but here's my question. Mayor Furlong: Motion's been made and seconded. Is there any discussion? Councilwoman Ernst. Councilwoman Ernst: Do we have to make, do we have to second each, should we be seconding, oh we don't have to? Mayor Furlong: We're doing it all as a single motion. So unless there's a desire to break it up or modify it, but they're all the same. Councilman Peterson: The only reason why you would break it up normally is if you'd want to vote for one and not vote for another one. Councilwoman Ernst: Oh, okay. Mayor Furlong: So with that, is there any discussion or other questions? To clarify council's understanding of what we're doing. Any discussion? If not, the motion's been made and seconded. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded that the City Council approves the Rezoning of the Chanhassen High School site from Agricultural Estate District, A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office and Institutional District, 01. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded that the City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek Corridor with a Variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary zone, in conformance with the grading plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07, subject to the following conditions: 1. The construction activities associated with the proposed project shall not conflict with the easement granted to MnDOT for its wetland mitigation project. 2. To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor, the applicant shall submit a plan for the restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor (including the drainageway along the north side of the substation and the area east of the bus/event entrance) with species consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded that the City Council approves the Site Plan with Variance for a three-story building and up lighting for a High M1 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots, plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas, plazas and scenic overlooks. Bicycle parking pads and storage racks shall be provided on site. 2. The developer shall include angled visitor parking in the drop-off access west of the building entrance. 3. The building fagade flood lights shall be permitted contingent upon meeting the intent of the lighting ordinance and subject to city review and approval. 4. Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalks or trails connect. 5. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by opening day of the school: • Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection. • Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for the addition of a north leg to the intersection. • Construct the following turn lanes: Approach Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Noah Bypass lane School Access Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North 200 feet School Access Westbound North School Access at Through lane becomes 300 feet Lyman Boulevard turn lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 100 feet Lyman Boulevard Westbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 300 feet Build Lyman Boulevard through/right Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon 200 feet Road South Westbound Lyman Boulevard at 200 feet Audubon Road South Northbound Audubon Road South at Build to add through Lyman Boulevard I lane Southbound Audubon Road South at 200 feet Build Lyman Boulevard I I throu ri t m City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 a. In addition the School District shall participate in the cost of the upgrading of Lyman Boulevard on a fair and equitable basis. 6. Building Official Conditions: a. The buildings must be protected with automatic Fire sprinkler systems. b. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls). d. Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 7. Fire Marshal Conditions: a. A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. c. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.3. d. Yellow curbing and "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of signs to be installed. e. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. f. Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.4. 8. Forester Conditions: a. Increase plantings for parking lot area in order to meet ordinance requirement of 156 trees. 47 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 b. Replace Black Hills spruce seedlings with white spruce. c. Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected. Fencing shall be installed around trees prior to grading. d. Understory seedlings shall be located among overstory deciduous trees. e. The applicant shall increase the quantity of seedlings planted in each grouping. f. All deciduous seedlings shall be protected by tree tubes. Tubes shall be monitored and removed at the appropriate time. All tubes shall be fitted with protective bird netting. g. All ash trees shall be replaced by an alternative species. h. The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yard plantings along the east property line. Native shrubs and vines shall be incorporated into the landscape in addition to trees. i. The columnar Norway maple shall be replaced with a different columnar tree such as Armstrong red maple, Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species. 9. Engineer Conditions: a. The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses to Lyman Boulevard. b. ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska to construct the access through the substation property. c. Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland/wetland mitigation and Lyman Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100-year event. d. Additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future width of Lyman Boulevard will be treated in the ponds. e. Hydrology to the wetland/wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point must be maintained. f. The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting. g. The development team should reexamine the proposed grades within the infield of softball field 1 to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher's mound. h. Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner. 48 A .. City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must be approved by the appropriate private utilities. Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan. k. The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer. 1. Pond, drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands. in. The developer must adjust the sanitary sewer manhole elevations according to City standard detail plates. n. The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine if the high school construction has damaged the pipe. If the City televises this sanitary sewer before the high school construction mobilized, the developer will only be required to televise the line after construction is complete. o. The school district will be reimbursed $166,424.00 which is the cost difference between the 18-inch trunk and 10-inch lateral watermain. p. Trunk water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued. q. The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds. r. Based on the proposed utility plan, an irrigation meter is required. s. The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer, existing overhead utilities and existing gas pipelines. t. Mylar and digital as-builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver County coordinates. 10. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions: a. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner compliant with the project's Wetland Alteration Permit, Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 9420). b. The project shall comply with the conditions of its Conditional Use Permit for Development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. c. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including all information required by the NPDES Construction Site Permit shall be located at the job trailer. Mt City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 d. Stable emergency overflows shall be provided for the proposed ponds on site. The emergency overflows shall be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed. The emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re -enforcement mat or fabric and riprap. e. The plan shall include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site. The timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow area. The rate of mulch application shall also be included on the plans (2 tons per acre, disc anchored). f. All riprap/fabric at the flared end section shall be installed within 24 hours of flared end section installation. g. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tyne of SloW Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. h. Silt fence that is not placed on the contour shall have J-Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet. Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas. The areas of temporary sediment basins shall be labeled on the plan. A temporary and/or permanent sediment pond shall be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared End Sections WES) 7 and 8. This shall be installed prior to grading and then used as a temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland. If it is used as a temporary pond, it should stay in place until all turf is established. Temporary outlet structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) shall be provided for the ponds; details should be provided. j. Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering methods from the City's project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior to conducting any and all dewatering on -site. k. Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets. 1. The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A). 50 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 in. The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area. n. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. o. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (i.e., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. 11. The applicant and city staff shall look at reasonable alternative designs to reduce the impact of the retaining walls. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded that the City Council approves the Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on the site of the Chanhassen High School, plans prepared by Pinnacle Engineering, dated February 9, 2007, subject to the following conditions: 1. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. All wetlands and wetland buffer areas shall be protected by silt fence during grading. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans. 2. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). 3. The applicant shall provide additional information as to how the vegetative communities and hydrology for Wetlands C and D will be re-established. 4. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 5. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit." 51 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Furlong: Alright, thank you everyone. Big evening for the City of Chanhassen and School District 112 so congratulations. Thank you very much. APPOINTMENTS TO PLANNING COMMISSION. Mayor Furlong: The City Council has authorized four standing commissions so whereby residents are appointed to assist the council on various matters throughout the year. The commissions include the Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission, Senior Commission and Environmental Commission. Appointments to these 7 member commissions are for 3 year terms, beginning in April each year and are staggered as such that 2 or 3 positions expire each year. Appointments for mid-term vacancies can occur at any time and such appointments would be for the unexpired portion of that vacancy's term. Between March 12a' and this evening the City Council interviewed 8 candidates for 3 open positions on the Planning Commission. City Council is indeed grateful to all those who applied, as we recognize that each applicant is willingly offering a substantial commitment of their time and energy for the benefit of us all. Unfortunately the number of high quality, qualified candidates again exceeded the number of available positions. As such we are not able to appoint some applicants of whom we are confident would have been able to serve well. After full consideration of each applicant's background and skills, the current and anticipated issues facing the Planning Commission and the City Council, it is the City Council's decision to appoint Kevin Dillon, Dan Keefe and Jerry McDonald to the Planning Commission with each term to expire on March 31, 2010. I would hereby move these 3 nominations and ask the council for a second. Councilwoman Ernst: Second. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there any discussion on those nominations? Hearing none, well proceed with the vote. Mayor Furlong moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded to appoint Kevin Dillon, Dan Keefe and Jerry McDonald to the Planning Commission with each term to expire on March 31, 2010. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Furlong: Again to all the applicants, all those who submitted applications to the Planning Commission but were not appointed this time, we thank you for your interest and your commitment to making Chanhassen a better place for all of us to live. We're very grateful for your willingness to serve and encourage you to consider applying again in the near future. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS: Mayor Furlong: One item that I will bring up, the Chanhassen Rotary Club is again this year for the third in a row in the process of selecting the winner of it's 2007 Distinguished Service Award. Those ballots with the 3 finalists are going out to various organizations this week. As in the past, the City Council receives one vote and the method that we've used that seems to work well is, Mr. Gerhardt will distribute the finalist summary resume to each of us and then we will 52 City Council Meeting - March 26, 2007 indicate our preference back to Mr. Gerhardt and then he will cast the council's ballot for the, that individual, that finalist that received most of the votes and that will be coming up here in the next couple weeks, so just to let people know on that. So if you could respond timely once you receive that information, Mr. Gerhardt would appreciate it. Each of the commission's also receive a vote as do a number of non-profit, civic and religious organizations throughout the city. There are about 45 different organizations that receive ballots to vote on that so the recipient will be awarded at the Rotary's Gala this coming May 5`s. Any other council presentations? If not, Mr. Gerhardt, Administrative Presentations. ADMINISTRATION PRESENTATIONS: Todd Gerhardt: The Minnesota Coalition on Government Information has recognized the City of Chanhassen for it's John Finnegan Freedom of Information Award. For our web site. Pass that around for you to look at. And just very proud of the staff and everybody that contributes to our web site. Councilman Litsey: Great job. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Anything else? Todd Gerhardt: That's all I have. Mayor Furlong: Extend our congratulations to the staff. I know that the area relating to projects, which is an excellent portion of the web site. Allows residents to follow a given development project or other matters going on and stay up to speed is just a great part of that web site, which I know. Todd Gerhardt: It's a real team effort. Laurie and Kim, Karen, Rick, Corey, the engineering department really keep the web site up to date. The public gets the council packets before you guys really do so you know, we don't have anything to hide. Everything is out there from our minutes to our council packets to our codes and ordinances that are out there. People can access that I think fairly easily from our web page. Couple of clicks and you're there so, they do a great job and this recognition shows that. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any questions for Mr. Gerhardt? CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilman Litsey seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m.. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim kL 53 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 Date: February 5, 2007 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to office and Institutional District; Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots; a Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District; and a Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on site. Applicant: Anderson -Johnson Associates, hie. and Independent School District 112. Planning Case: 07-06 Chanhassen High School The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on February 2, 2007. The 60-day review period ends April 3, 2007. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, stone water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on March 6, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than February 23, 2007. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Smint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 13. City of Chaska Location Map Chanhassen High School Planning Case No. 07-06 City of Chanhassen CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 07-06 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, at7:00p.M. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office and Institutional District, OI; Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots; Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District; and Welland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on site. The property is located north of Lyman Boulevard, south of the Twin Cities and Western Railroad, and west of Bluff Creek. Applicant: Anderson - Johnson Associates, Inc. and Independent School District 112 - CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review op tpe ity's web site a 1.. 7 S I U / oratCityy uring regular bus ines s hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: Phone: 952-227-1131 (Published in the Chanhassen Villageron Thursday, February22, 2007; No. 48M) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. // (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. 7 .3� was published on the date or dazes and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijkbimopgrstuvvn By: Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and swom before me on 1 / , Ifs V _�-- ArhGWEN M. RADUENZ NOTARY PUBLIC-WNNESOTA MYCamnaftE irwAt31,2010 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $40.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $40.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $11.89 per column inch SCANNED City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 Date: February 5, 2007 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to office and Institutional District; Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storagelmaintenance buildings and parking lots; a Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District; and a Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on site. Applicant: Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. and Independent School District 112. Planning Case: 07-06 Chanhassen High School The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on February 2, 2007. The 60-day review period ends April 3, 2007. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on March 6, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than February 23, 2007. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Amry Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or SurintlUnited) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Vailev) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 13. City of Chaska scPsNEo Location Map Chanhassen High School Planning Case No. 07-06 City of Chanhassen District 112 New High School SHEET DRAWING LIST . TIFIESNEEF... CIVIL: EX' BNXWNRY. LOCATION, TDPIXWS iRAPC AUFttIIY Y w.0 WE REFERENCE PLAN CIA REMOVALS PUN CZI WE GEOMETRIC PUN C21 WE GEOYETRIC PUN w] WE GEONEFAIC PUN C21 WE GEOMETRIC PUN CAI GRACING l DRAINAGE PLAN Cu GRADING A MAINAGE PUR C13 GRACNG A CNWNPGE PUN CSA GRACNG A ORMNAGE PLAN "I WE RETAINING WALL PUN CAI UTILITY 1. U.S VTILf" PUN U.S UTILITY PUN G ITL PUN C5.0 E.K N CONTRK PUN CA.I WE F"N M Pux CAi WE FINISHING PX CAS AIIF FINISHING PUUN CS A SREFINISNINCPUN w.5 PLAZA FINISHING PLAN CT.I UNOSCAPING PUN mh UNOSCARxG PUN w. LANOSCAPIxc PLAN CFI L ANLACAPINGPIAN GY WRWATONPUN w.I WE DETAILS w] SITE CETAILs w.A SITE DETA L ARCHITECTURAL: A101 O N ALL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PUN ANN OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PUN AI03 ME BALL SECOND FLCDR PUN A I BUILDING ELEVATIONS ELECTRICAL: E010 ELECTPoUL WE PLAN Eon ELECTIUCLL BTAWY PLAN E010P ELECTRMAL WE PLAN PNOTOMEIMICS E%IP ELECTRICAL AT"UM PUN A TOMETWCS CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 0 2 2007 011I NHASSEN PLANNING DEPT District 112 New High School PROJECT TEAM, i� urmem4 �ti•e xu.�Ra. ei�.�r� TITLE SHEET INDEX m w (Gv 1\v.mty peeC Oowmenl Na IWt15) ob," meb pIK \I„t ppl of Ne rbtl, ryr or ue N+t4.1 wuu. or 5«tim tl«U[ Cm tleaV4 }Z, \urrl6 I6 XVN, Pm9e iJ Weal o Ne Sb Greeyel t YVgLLn Mwa IF. gvaRe .sse> weaeled�m9t vr"m .. w✓dwa «wmrmt . yva,LExaM 3n —1111 m ec )5 kwe\ I. oa,e S'fl111 v1. a I—. Soa .e Xym, mre .1 a— eIBM 'a caa, a am„ smu a eyeat by -I-. frfl ptle l1-1 b,e, SemtenY ,Bti] !¢I Mp _ .I^, e emgntd ive la Ue "eMwMa rdtuaN ))R by reef. ty— Swq 21 1 tl m l..l a a . lel.]8 v MCA91 ftt to vlMge SzfX B9 aepmvl� Hot ofC6 mF atht6X able,'toa a 1 Oql boa, n. a.ertWarler le m amlt rmbeM ca.uele ppe b mf,..m., Mmeb, N 6;Bt tlmq rXe eml Ie of aa. Xl caboo to Ne r rWay ,,li I yoollar, be„er tpFnM9 xmbp to Ne W,emmsl sane, r1.vM. a,.« be, wuo, a tyabat . e aEss mvrzx. o«omre ,o u, K= .1u .le« r e b., amr. mnlme Iw m a,Ie w.wnm ar smu xa, m ue oya,ro.me u,m,. et s, < . I IIy Pmge si iya9.e... boo er 2Z abe lJ n. *o �v p«t ar , ba,, a �yllI> ([.,aw ed Aa w. xaae) .w IM�lea, a "l I'o -Ie , I. IMeruM�q tf— wmt1. boo ,N Sxrm^. yeb ubiave gmlC 'm mnkalim IFe I «a �X,.vl O. e, I'LRnm i .1 . ® b. —.— ,urry —, m .nbvgenY v¢M Fe bIa sm Wvnv a b IFe .ma wt, )]O.W Meru e.N.'r s,,v—,, leeam -1 . e t eras.. �ru.e bet, a, po.t a .-. ,aa war. at m.—txwa.t. a t�-, rPeze X� b� iIp x). w aae,a� _ bey _ QS] ZmeC .boy, b s�mnrte sba WeLL� tote, ]6e99 l�eetw V« oea Wuaab. a[Fe Y« m,t Yuty a b'. er.v1o1 me b+rn eren.eaae l tlaa e elt If m 9. w&yat Oem y-ra,e ba to to a eee g 89'be yp yrleaa mnl..Su mb eat nl 9Y,9] yeet ^Ieaa , eew50 1, X XI121 11m M aem+ —, 3.lo ie„ 1t ®eea e,eyeI mt ". 1-1lt. ]. ue92.. I beat f, mwly—itE—,.. tool bee, •at .��mel 1. �m^eWg p LeeR Ib poee to erb, m r ,l Ib amw.mla —'e .,—aPewl..1. 1^9 U teen of N. de —'ea weryn )}IW fw be boo. ® 1 .g v M aee 1, e6.69 M, obee =- 5) ]0 ,. tl . W W ea- " _ va'. .mem, w at m..vt e. boo -b beb ba td 1— �y Mamg«dal eetbwmFtarby,., ��m.. a /^\ � , �wle� gym, a.a «. am a me mma at9ty.1-� at wy �b. � « a - la. a P"W tn, I,m fl .uk to urt avnen a eryv may �r r Fb;. vX,.,�,F >d�l F,warmeipe ata�me fl��,.m 1) 4rry,cad,b,• mN fa,.ar I 1 11 ala flaxml� µ' I of rv. nyaml •• • • I ,.) vay'. npw .e, by v.nae, rnaFeaFa Fc m .ur I. zom. o- f � Y 1 1 i I. •wAaF9a, I, ;. nooemyw m saa swat—u o, s ' \ . 12 ab, b, . ,, xx 1 \ 1 N � Leyet P s xm.m.1. �- �av�oro w r � ✓� _ v I a..e. I u` I Xa dNMWY.LIXJ1)AIY RMCIpP49iG �ea_ — _ — _Sun ema-a, I,,, — - - - — —®-� Owner:j; Chaska Public Schools Independent School District 112 11 Peavey Road Chaska, Minnesota 55318 952-556-6100 Zoning: Existing: A-2 (Agricultural / Estate) Proposed: O-1(Otfice/Industrial) Parcel Size: 4,131,752 Square Feet (94.83 Acres) Proposed Building Size: Gross Floor Area: 406.209 Square Feet Surface Coverage: Building Footprint: 242,365 Square Feet (5.56 Acres) 5.86%OF SITE Additional Impervious Surfaces (Lots, Drives, Walks, Athletic Facilities): 835,000 Square Fast (192 Acres) 20.25%OF SITE Proposed Wetland Alteration: Existing On -Site Wetlands: 1,071.500 Square Feet (24.6 Acres) Proposed Welland Filling: 73,423 Square Feel (1.69 Acres) Proposed Wetland Construction (1.5:1): 111,000N-Square Feet (2.55 Acres) Proposed Upland Buffer Construction (0.5:1): 37,000 Square Feel (0.85 Acres) Total Proposed Constructed/Dedicated Wetlands @ 2:1 Req'd: 148,000 Square Fast (3.4 Acres) Number of Parking Spaces Provided Including Handicapped 920 Spaces i �Yr i j LEGEND �h.TMr a£ol / District 112 ® j�,( @ Future High ✓ School rl @NL Yoh aM N !peHe,x Maeshme W[ene 6 a,th sw.h M n i F MACnF s, h��ua�map /' � 6va,enm / a mxmassa r vomaA /� N 71 � .v.v»ace m e,xmr� SITE REFERENCE PLAN SITE LOCATION MAP CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY CO.0 LEGEND O .Bq NOTES: '�o `rvw`Fuwo uvoe.ami.ov,.,,ra u u�.Es.wv�ir�mwssrnoe,,,m rnnaw v�mnwa®wn III '� �nvuwlvnxwce® aunv.,®no,lwmxo � '' ox.w.ce .wae.vwi.vmttA e .� A ..s....., o P I - i - --- ii / Y' 1� \X 1 h I %I ) CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School v.aeCT . AJW V azozm oW REMOVALS PLAN C1.0 NOTES 2 CH CA ILL PAN RO LET Al EVARROPi —a eta+wvawt R PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL /ftnI + L MATCHLME k1 — — MATCHLINE n PROPOSED HIGH SMCRYLOil'- TO ARA. PURIST Ness NON All GnENS ONs DRITal OTHERWISE NOTED o POECRDPR+NEEwNaNAeORNEANROPETY�RsGG SP sr« PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL INL.RTG.RCHeH.ET., /I District 112 Future High School rNDNNCTT e� III OFI A, n.. nma++o OIL .-ARLD A, �......P OR w19Ak u:.::w,." ., AACT m.. _ `R+_ I I amm+tunm At -All -al. __— I mil■ rvm AR "O war av«sam a�ru I I 'a CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY w..Nnms• u PORORF Ri At"Ol —RE, SITE GEOMETRIC PLAN C2.1 L— —=cHLI=Ep1_ — "TCHUNEn I PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL I ,n[eER'. sm." l AR —A j - I 1 As I l AGARAN . +..r I � I i � / • it I i, , PARKING m y ' A. ��- e s / Yi i . .lwrrl, '4�'�\\. II NOTES 9r MO 4AYE. lPrtl6PA � 019.E O f9LL r9 r16AE O.®. 9 District 112 Future High School PFNICT TEYI'. ve�emz„o me,zawrs �- rx,vE 0.2is+,ID =w�.1- .. AA1 .� on 1I SITE GEOMETRIC PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C2.2 W W t J J a ws — "r� _ s District 112 — -r Future High -• � t s School CTrF.ac m a"\% —� yme'� � rm.•v� �w.a aw e I I _ S { i NOTES \ .,. '� nay �"- - . ,✓� .,,�' �O .... i n ; �Ewroasan u,mwR � y O� O O I ,..a,.Ewumx woE.�ru.uww+ra \ i � s s� "IVY d SITE r am� GEOMETRIC .,. PLAN MATCHUNE n MATCHLIN;7 CITY SUBMITrAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C2.3 MATCHLINE /4 _ 11 saccrnz I \\. NOTES District 112 Future High School w w u u a. mxacax���r a a iIF _ w�az..wsn�m�m �/ s..an. m,oumn«xm a jw SITE GEOMETRIC PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL �L^.� FOR REVIEW ONLY GENERALNOTES ,. ALL �..NCE. AMEAST L..RT....,,..R,.ET.,Ewwv.1. AN xaesE...L OLEEo.. IwR,r.L01, w.Es:oGYE,.,e. Y THEN C MATEREACTOR — ONNITATRA AND PAI FOR AGE REALTY AD COUNTERACTION DMIURBEET By CONSTRUCTIOR NOT DOE CRICALLF ERIC STED TO ARGENTHE A CEIRCLANY NEED MIC ME MIGH , FEE... IN... IF. NET I FORT H� HCH STEDS, A COPY OF A, 3HALL HE SEETTED PATH SEEN ME .1 PC: FT: 1. THE ISTLEME 4 CONNECTOR FEALL BE RESPOSSISLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC SANTAGANCE FRENTESTREPTATEN COMES, 1. COLOCARD I -- --I. AGAGOTATEL. TO. FREE GO.I.I. STALT. REASTE. OR RELIGHT ALL — PALMS .1 WO COST TO THE CAMINER TO FEE OF THE ENDANGER eY LOLLAGS ARM OF- -1.«.L. ANTRY..mer o....K�s.R.TOMALL�.� �..rE,..w.. —1FOOF o ®. 1UNLE`..o,���. . ESPECT SITE AND LOT ON NORMAL ING OF BY 21 MAIL STORM MOMENT INFIN ENABLE � OP CLAFMA A CARL 1, HATER I E—� MANYTHERSELL ME • —'A ALL PLAME ANCY CHEYAR ESSESECTIONG. AN. VARELY SAME MET ONE HY. —ONLY BE LOCATE NFL "IS TING IF — BERLY FORMAL 'ON SHE MET MENTAT ELF-GAN AT ALL E— OTIL HER RALLY LOCAT FIR ADDS AMID STRIATIONS OF RARE BEFORE BEGANING ITT IS IN HEADSTONE. L���TO�MYFLL 11 NUAKEETAIN —T THERSTAINGLY ANG PLEAD STATTIM — GRECTI OCANTRAGROCTION ATE-1 MYSELF ALL PERFORMED . FROM SERVICE THERS THREET. L—S I T A� ENDS ION C GET C DL A INGODC A HE Ll C-11 Y BOTH MEMPA ATCH LOCCALL — ENTED TO ANCED PLACE PRAT Of I EASE STALE1 'AT S - AEG A' G R ...o o :Eo"E LLoo..Tw ,u AN. a.LmT ss>To� . IN• Yq. TYPICALLY mT OR AS 9,N. l wcEUTwb TO AEU Y..T OR INS 11 SHOT EFFE"IFFECTENTS REMARKS EN PIONEER ET, RANGES ANCY—AACMI cuTTE T S ARABS STAGES) .-- SPOT 11— MEN, DREAT A GO TERM ENE BE GORE IN ORDER TO CON' I IN L Y "BE-. MORK ISDICATED ON THE Rvys SMALL BE MCGHTENTAE TO TOM CONTRACT. OF N z z ,I At LEGEND REFERENCEE .RL.T.N.-wi-,'-M_5 i o T.moaEOLwwEi.o NOTES: PROTECT POSTINQ NEST T AT ION AMID SH F EF AI CARS IIGARBS INTAGGRAGGAGANSMARDESTRIETATIOR ACTOOKENNALCONSTIETTIFFECARREBA CONNOTHAREFFIGNIFFIELF ATIONECIONT EMAYSTING SOILS, UGHLITEP AND OTHER SITE THEREATTERMIGHTS RELEGRALL Of ANY FALLEN TREES DGETAIROLLEME SEGMENTAL 0 AN ENG.—MESTACED.TTLATE—ENTAF—TRITE­ GENCH S MARC H PAN SCHEDULED TO ON SIMMONS CA 9 MANAGE 0 BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION CONSTRAINTS STEEL NAME ALLSITTITHECEA CITY CR— S COAL AMC TOP HALL CONECTIBLE I I MANAGER MAY fl --_ PROVIDE 20'-0" "NO GRADING' BUFFER SHI_ `r -" EXISTING - WETLAND -4 — s�4.� /* .-D __ y-" _ '- '-_ ALI - _ ��,' fit �� }BE Q - DELINEATED WETLAND ... STIFF A` STALLE OEM eR 4A..C"`.. .•Zr- 1 �'-"Z,. _ I FRTOM Lei -- -�IF ___- ____'____ TT -EARIGGII-LEMBIL 11 I �f .RATCOMMESO R1TI'D..SELON s .� L—MATCHLINE pt MATCHLINE M4 �; y Y PROVIDEW0 - 'NO GRADING" BUFFER i I RE— L r^ SEEIREENT —I— SEEMS, (CITY SUBMITTAL ARMFOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School ® a -., ISM MARINE TNNAN�I— HIT 1 MY an I— AFA AREA TRE�N.E EGRE ME AN, YEALTS PROGRAMMING YEARRESTANT T,T„�.. ITT AN E :.T. AM IF ME, FRA TE •.Tm �+n SAM-A., ..A aavwpsa aMARS, .a.aa NHN Ell.ew+� .mw CAN El xM,m n CAN CLACT^— SCAND — PRU p GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C3.1 J_ — MATCHLIINNEE#1 MATCHLINE ri4 1}{ 1 1 1 M1 ,. � � 1 i 1 16 ,. 1 i 11 e EN DELINEATED WETLAND I 111I f` j� 4 t\ �J ♦ \ 11 j��\ l DELINEATED WETLAND ' PROVIDE YPG' 'N / "NO GRADING' BUFFER - _ DELINEATED WETLAND PROVIDE 1l 'NO GRADING' BUFFER LEGEND NOTES: ��w�TN a°rreon ,.�z..laaeex o.., uc/.o..crwra®a..Nvla u•aw�� _. I�FNRn WfAEvwiA -u—MWJmivxW o IRLgyEOIVMiFiA•14 • AOMEp G1CN WMICBI District 112 Future High School YXOJECITEIIY mW�.a n N 1 U mw �.mv... m. m..m.® �� Al■ ma�xumeemeza.�rr �d] GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL L . �3^^ FOR REVIEW ONLY a 1. LEGERETERENCE NDY T SOT OEarxuKa : SSE BER NOTES. i-.; _ i —__i 1, i •.i 1 i i i 7r PNOVOE70'i' at District 112 Future High i ! 1 1 , ,i y�9{p{ i r 1 i � ,I " i �i i-- i �•" SCI700l 'NO GRADW BUFFER r acr I ti lii aaM�_� 0El1ffM®WErLOo--, i ED— ow —� — c 0. Elf Eira . d 1 ,��� � � 9 1 i I f GRADING & ,r DRAINAGE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C3, 3:1 - 3 -1 -. District 112 Future High School LL aoccen. I PX EC iIi- �; 1 • v.• i I I �.bwr6za�>s / ti LEGEND NOTES: � � ft- • on.•s �\ k' � - i 3 �z{• 1'., �-.a...w Bald. I _ _ Wr,I i i5 R CfOBi /✓f f t II' .� GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL A r;, # FOR REVIEW ONLY Cj3 °4 NOTESwF, District 112 Future High School vw�ect rew: .asw. �..xn,.L. Yl■ i�mmW r„w maim r� a� SITE RETAINING WALL PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C3.5 NOTES LEGEND v:°onwwaro.c �wrc�aal — _' ' -_ UTILITY NOTES SECTION ,_... Q OUTLET CONTROL u1 STRUCTURE (BASIN 1) x' x V V PROVIDE 26'-0" "NO GRADING" BUFFER ' EXISTING ' WETLAND I I mesa IW.re w. aai� �ws.um _ -s I 4� I —MA=CNIJID:H I YATCHLWN S ' _ -7- -DELINEATED WERAND .PROVIDE 2D'-0' `NO GRADING' BUFFER i S 5 rlfjl+ ,1. District 112 Future High School PROJECt,FAN: 'w. m�er� m m as, rrowm i m ua 89— r poi-�.mn msTec m wEm.o PROVIDE 16'fi- 'NO GRADING' BUFFER UTILITY PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C4.1 KATCHIJIM Tc 4. L7 27 q�� .�t opsos I ~ ✓' A . \ ti ti 1 DELINEATED WETLAND ti -r- — — — — — — — — — _ _ — — — — /�. — — — — Y'✓ DELINEATED WETLAND PROVIDE 16'E' 'NO GRADING' BUFFER DELINEATED WETLAND PROVIDE 20'-0' NO GRADING" BUFFER NOTES LEGEND �" rayon nanwrprp ..voaoaM�.0 } e ® no®arn.xr ���>_�:��=>•r�r�47•�� roc=-t. ppu CS:I<-1ppF�®c.�mmoc.am o •- mp0©m© oom o mppOppEa,�r,:n�imo� uppp�pppp�(9:1�."J•OppD��mpOOL—:£. o���p©ppCl•®�m�©� lo�caam0ommpp©[IDppp©f..�CI 'p0 mmpp®©®cr-ammo o� .. �—p3F1ppR�p�)•®caam��-�rr;::s. o� �pppp®p�]ppp�pQ)1pQ.)•[.iElm�t)•FT� pm��0mr�ac-raezao¢za mp�mp�pppp�p0®rs>tmoo�rm mom--•-^��m©®�cL•amuo ©pp�p�m �m[�pp0 m��mo�iri mp�Ot>•rv-n ®6LlE7�i m�r3>•4�t.�� p©p®®m©©®®m000 or—a-�S.3d•pnl®®mm �Lu7i �.� o�mmp®��m�LLl�� o� mopp®mr.�ma�ppp� mr cras�amQacL�mooc.� �p�� -• m�ID�i1�mm®uo mp��"...>—mmm©Qa oocs-yea �p� .. ���OQI•mmOO�:J MEN moo o Cl©© IIZE �. $RZV tim R �= n11 12 ®. GaavC OMN D•.Em`�EIER x�n�rf�NMWE _. 9 .ieNM xA�145.w66Y4LLEMB®wn�n�cm..Nmi .i�MRFSWbwiBE Si.iEYY.OY. ;jr1'i ..o,.o.vmm.r ....... SECTION . OUTLET CONTROL c'z STRUCTURE (BASIN 3) CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School pNQ¢RTFAY' I MR_.. . n mmcss. n. iwc�ea$ /� �l� nnavaernzm® 0>�389— -=w ozmm UTILITY PLAN C4.2 vp District 112 Future High _ I School . a �\ I PROJECT IENI� I NOTES ... -•e ,,,............, LEGEND ..o� la-v YY1M.v �qJ`� a wu.o•.cWs•ve�fbMlMwfnaa_mY. e r� _.. UTILITY NOTES u .. ...Y,.. I ��..a..w.......a...,�.s v., kn...cro ��• GRATE DETAIL PLAN SECTION � � I 1._w. �- �,\1�� 1 I I i j I i til` UTILITY I PLAN �f1� Fir� y.,o ITT SIB L NATCNIJNEM C4.3 �—�_ i '' ��' / t F REVIEW N Y l UTILITY NOTES ,. aEEE. ,.o AAAAG1 nu rRET-ED WE'S wsEa4Ei.uxr,•iu.onrowcwTxm�nsars,aw R11sro+cwrtwi any unnr ra,m,craws+uu ma, —. MATCHLINE R4 o PMI�4 • A- SUPOINGS AS RTO PEREPTECT THE CAUSscRr xE eLL ow,rtcnc�rcuv¢•¢xa �iroosNATER oww. x iEnu,c rpecYm�p[sns •• cy,Grroxe4sov ex-11..E,.Ex.E..N.,.oµ �HERGE BE, C w.i...p,SOULBE..,. ,.ENEWI.E,rrE.LLNNER,o,B, -.... - --. o4.w,r....�.sx4.x.vE...u•.•E„PmE..E.ro...„E,.E, y__. ,r 4s xm x�'s'sx4i COwiv'.mx<Eu, m„v,. u1 [,rMGB ywiEplCr.F Iw M10Emv0.vEiIn,RF�KJSEFNa. 5 12 CE x[ w, E,uu. Wi E 4tY.Eo rrtrwis,EyfTE KEn is E,p)t.TE,MVCit.ME.•IER,C.. pMP®'r4 1 � ALe HEYDRSEREL NE iXREAL,. 15 s,xe�a.rGREG PHAND SW me. sm]f. p,Ess amEsxsE SEWER v TO RACE WENHOTTLE WEN A ��GILL• y I.F. -THE ��—TENDERED 11 NSF F. .-Y� �.EE.,.,NG E,.N SEWER a IMMEDIATELY INSTALLING w,W,. x«RREAS .. w�TFIENSELLET INATEREGED IS IN DTHERWISE ACTED SE o ..EE a...E« BE.,EE,.,,E BOURGE•E.�I...«,r,�..E.. ....,ilro..«...E.EEa.E E.•�.�.ps,.ION N PERSON To PECANTRUCTION BE PROPOSED RUBJENING HICHA NEWSREEL STRAM LARGEST, � WATER SEEING, WEENES, ALL WITNESSES BEENTERENT 21 "OESTRACTLEAR NERTANT, START I FEET UP SURFACE ANDS CLAUDE. PEREENT TO —,— BE WAG N'WIS -'U, BER, o UTUJTV TEREARRACIEW G GS��' ANG SMALL "I ITAT ALL CONDENSATION GARDENS, LEAGUE AND ANPANJI GREW PULANES OF BE- SEWER 24 UTUI EGAIDENCIGN 11 LIABBECANDEL' RENT ILEARDS I THE A'— SEWER. SAIRES SEWER To WHAT ACTEENTRANCE OF — ESSICAL SE, THE UTILITY CONTRACHUB THATEL PROANDE TESTING BE ALL �C"� THOSE A ACCORDANCE RETH THE SEE AULL OPEN J TA�FLL MTELCHERES SLAI BE REELECTED WITH PENCENCES ECATAUt IN ACCONCENTE RATE WHEN ART EDE UP CHRISTOPHER TURF RESTIEREATION AND STEEL I AT THE CGREALICHERN OF THE PROULECT THE THERES SEWER SEREALLITHE FULLY CLEANNED STURSECRELF, TO ,Ip.,ox 'FDA rE.,..�l.r,,..waw.,..w.SECTRINEER .i.EEro. ww..Rp.ivE 4o.,re.E�E. To.,l.o•E AND CONSTRUCTION "WAGE R ANDER TO OF THE RETIRE v�re / narr� WERIESS SENSE,, 1 .UNI I District 112 - - I _ Future High School PROJECT TFAY: } I �.5x,rtc, .E.G., 1 ti R Mww_.,� .a tw.,.... ANNE .,...,. • — m..?.AL-TAB � HAS, _ REPAPPARE BE 1 v�ra LEGEND GW, LET 11 WflDEFAAI P s•p.�ll sPoPo.EU w,rv40.Vn e vxwo•sn 6sOm, 4wa �\ a vxwtasnnw,gEPp h_ 1 • vspp.E9 Uip MYIW\%� � � vROEOCMx RE NOTES IN AIR AND. AN N,,.e<». Tu~INY.B�S,-- UP905i?CW Pm e., A AN WELL � 'e� AWAAPEG �1.=K FiT �ZL2 1FLfE—� UTILITY PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C4.4 w3 m.r.m ...:w �naaeree,.r..euurrreeur (� CAT TRACKING (SLOPES css STEEPER THAN 6:1) law Czl WETLAND BUFFER Asa STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN -GENERAL SUMNIARY r. �..,....m„mi.m..,....o,.s.�...R.w.�,o.,.nw...A..��e,.,maw..rrm.m..,......k.s,m..w..m�r.-s i r .n wYmm m,i... 6.wJ.M1bN.4 h,msra�x,Ae.MYmmh6mml j .. v, uNN^.W�n�.uWa+.mo,m,.avup mewv'•nnm+tlmp..rv.nH.n.b.up:k...kmm�e rs {v^W MPo nm r ll,lk ­.+. .mQP,.ewwrira....ne,s. .. ,ew.. a. n,,., T,..I. w� O r I .- o o o , ' _ EROSION CONTROL KEY LEGEND TES O LEGEND CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School v�ecT TewN ..a„m bmTr.wro N 02 � rp— EROSION CONTROLPLAN C5.0 NOTES �. a[xex.i xmee ax,ox.on.xrm LEGEND 01 �w c' a w w z z zla U V ' PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL ' F. T L_ NA=CCHLINEE AH — NATCHLINE R] I PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL '- �xowio.xexariEen� p e { .i t� t 7 =:1 1'ct r + r d ALTERNATE FINISHING PLAN cE.e SCALE: i"=50' EXISTING WETLAND I ---------------- -� PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL! mertx.o.xcxareers� I I I I ,_ —L7- CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School PFWER IEpN. u. en mrommiue�ss 'xzmis m ITT mxs _. woes r=� ozceo7 ou SITE FINISHING PLAN C6.1 — MATCH LINE Ct — MATCHLINE Q PROPOSED HIGH;SOHOOL I..nE TO M`Cx 9xEEfel A I u.eva I \ mmru e \� P «ET.xo j� NOTES LEGEND N.a Te rwxuw.rhlrc.nxaaw arfTwra�ear,a,l axcanwcmxsa,acwo.oPmi �,.... Pu,. s..m.� District 112 Future High School Prs ECTrenN- oza:a, ou SITE FINISHING PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C6.2 oza:a, ou SITE FINISHING PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C6.2 r - - ---- ----- ----- - ------ =1 y - - 4 -- - - - -_.. ______ - --- _ .- __. - - - - _-- _ District112 -- --- � ---- - ---" _.- __... _ --------- ---_`_'.� - -- -- -- Future High -c- , School i I PRO{ e_^ a w' e � 3 I s mzsasr m wwss ' I �I l■ w'.n.wew �ex.vrm 00 U NOTES s. LEGEND ♦ = TCH ME= '. MATCHLINE 04 _a ♦ SITE FINISHING ��r z y\ PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL j FOR REVIEW ONLY C6.3 MATCHLINEEE # MATCHLINE W --- — — -- District 112 Future High 8 School PRLJECf TEAM: F i aZiW ' ,w vv. eusxm � � � ✓ mxswx w msxn� I. onnw.a.emr. w4aa�a'°�v nxaasn �•Ms.m -' LEGEND NOTES �dsawm - ^.�: � Bsrt mw�artmrz r. �� mntarmrwrm ro s.�. o.Bi� mm %Gs fvi / SITE FINISHING - —• -c ,� / �:'i PLAN 1 — / CITY SUBMITTAL j; i FOR REVIEW ONLY C6 M4 i \I, I I NOTES T aer+.. now. rnaiacmn„nm LEGEND 0....w�...,.�. Qw O.m..a,....er.r a� o o r e `CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School a C, T. I E,"A-I u v PLAZA FINISHING PLANS C6.5 PLANTING SEEDING AND SODDING NOTES: LEGEND ,.»ec..e.xa+.rc..n...ec..xo..moc.w,w.o.crra. ra,..cm..wevm �.ms.�n.[oxw.s,xn»,x[uu..•r�wn.uc.,ox.«.,,ff a �I satEoo».uo,an.w[e. ..[.,ns.aren esw°Fa"w mR �wa.'�.«wcdwm:x..omew�.mr'�. a..+rnx....r.px•nu.u._w..r a.nm.. „•w.c.�,m..>_.r.,r.arr�wvru...s�rxna_.,+,o EXISTING WETLAND 11l °o -- tIL ' PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL -.� -1( I ,�O O �r .a•.•.•�x„as� jlljl -�{ - OOO I 1 _--------------- - PROPOSED HIGH SOH L_ —_ .re.®a.x � ExncY =.. t LJ - 1 — A TOHLME M • ne MAIOHLINE Ni ?--t — District 112 Future High School PR.I T.. aos)ox / vswa pa eM � I, �ssx wa CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY LANDSCAPING PLAN C7.1 —MA=CHLI=EMI— — I MATCHLINE #2 PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL Ki Ij MIM�- 212 W W Z 2 .0 I a i _"C—P PLANTINSEEDING SAND SODDING NOTES: ��.'. cM Crb.m Ntl pwNm I+.�w.4..9—,•..rpf%—wb•ml s6lfinenbswW uaa. wa. W..4 wMnRMNM ••Y. � �evyyrww. ..�� Oraiwrr5s�u - Y•nCY,.sbnf Pfeigw •. rti � ^�� .wryu...r.rew. s.—iw.e•— nw c>.mr• e Rr.. emer r wws >•. wWbn+V+arr..•e.�+urerus.vraor.w Mwfw� �•.mR-.esv��. u—e W r•.yOMa•s,m•tl N•ua—p M�— w,.•.E�..•wa. LEGEND Irsre.f.m.nE frw �n.� •..fsmn F.nW O`°"r•wwm� e O® o.�w„w.nwt e o PERIMETER BUFFERING REQUI BUFFERYARD A i EVfAfYHMmx Prt BUFFERYARD B • E�nEwwwa�Rn wa�.E�wR District 112 Future High School PROTECT TEAM: �hID.nw 4nxaYa�w mrw- N zeammmw� .W.P..cfwl2 m....rn I-w mrw.e.nE.R�.fn 6NwED l4PCYE-IP.fa e.nfs f�.i LFSE�•� LANDSCAPING -��- �- PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL I��.^ FOR REVIEW ONLY L -_ _ ww F F , — f _ — t O d" �,�,,,,.. — __ _ .os - _ -= _ _ '^�`""i_<_ - _ t. _ District112 - --- -- - t �cP o ---- _-s..:�' I - --- - - - Future High : ._._i - ®�. School , / ®®• - :. a I PR0.IECT TFAM' ' \.R \ C � R / /- _�°oo°pOOa( °;- a°°°°°°-P°° \ APPOOST:"o`y",,.,.a..,s IT— STERNMESEEN'TANS. \ -..J °°°ol «, „� m_. o ��.RESTERM T ST NO LEGEND imwm— KILL KNEES ED —_ 00 SEE I IT _. „° 140 SPRINKLER READ AS INTERIOR BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS \ 'w m \ �:� / ....— m o°O�/ '� ' _ 1—AN'.n«n ART ,u.R..nuNORCIRersuxoAREA „MEss //i NALA!� _ w N.O RE , PLANTING SEEDING ANNSPECT D ATISODDINNG NOADDET TES /_ / F _ «�� IDDEST ,.N°,.Eo, �,K..E. m.,NmTO ME PAR NO,.,N,�..,,, o_.....0.•.NN...o, NNEMMMI `°� ATESEL�Gyq /° y`N�LAN LAA ,PAR aOR ' e MST ,»a,o xoN,uMc. N._ o,..N,,.„, ✓ONTRACTOR A—, ®®® � � f�.'nlm - - , ,. ILJ'� RAESELAN R MAWOTREE„oR...o,oc. ORRYwm,r..�ARunec. OPT LIKERACKINE Toumxo �� ,__. '- -���,. T.—RE° AAAA—a_ / e._ ./ .. a mxIMI xa , ... _ 1 MARTIN .:a AA._.. W{ ..rT..P_ OO O / I l _ a a o i _ 0 jw ASPIK PI PERIMETER BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS I , I = BUFFERYARDA�cvnr ', LANDSCAPING «EROR.E.TR..:,., I �i I PLAN ' .. a, ur AN, a..Nwx°n°:.. e,::o,.au:.aN°.:q BUFFERYARBB m I I �) I` :,wm. _ �ATC=LINE= — N T� ..,T E.�T..FNT�„NTT MATCNDNEB4 a'' _ — — "— �" — % CITY SUBMITTAL SPLE—�mSELLAD-OLIMEN,.R.. � --�� � �m FOR REVIEW ONLYF C7.3 i m _ I _ 'aLe1N/c e MATCHLINE= MATCHLINE W��_ ,w ..•. - _ _ , -- -yam. ,.._,. .000p 0 \ SSys, I NO O ® YIC __ .0 =I_ PLANTING, SEEDING AND SODDING NOTES: s OONnRnexm"c m..E.EwsrmawoEWu�¢REreEro V -__ 1N •. ui msameev�u®wosaNna / j.. M 1RFE8YOawoexuifaNEf W,xbu.Eu�i®�uYOOo ` �'� �• f uNI RbMNCCFhFS OETIR[S.Yp��T.�.RIDSOCR� % � O.EM8�10F8 ueOXLln - muWlFii. n• WWnnenMwG aW®nm�m EIMEx. // 60uRD,REf sPEFEIO E6niu n N. E�IYIR116dlO. /'� V O�WiY4 N�iOROf11®YYDIG WIE mMss W YnYEY9�+YY14R�44. W tiv,41MOv,es+9 Wa YM. Md�.MRYW M1Ma dEV4� imymtNYnv. ' � •/L., � I � O�T0.na WNUM~E�4MaYa WwMROn�RRryW RfYa // •%_ppp rmp Y' �� '/ Cs9v OMnaa ~Wll J/�/ / nmrb.e�bb�mE��ma�aabiv , }`'.Emswavaewa�:uwx�YnroW+Nmv«manu+W BLVD �� mn x x 2 2 I LEGEND ep YH,AIP W'+El�y� CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School yRp UTF.IW: .wm sn:m-nw bnnn..m b n,.ae»n m..ars.s+on w IIAI� 02� WAo�� LANDSCAPING PLAN C7.4 ✓ I I.IWnM 1 m _ _ 15, � w] r , \I ------------- /r/^1utt1 TT t ORYLFT »yMR.], u � p 0 � f _ _ p 0 o o0 i _ _ I � t , LEGEND � i 1 wP. i.or,wi 1 IvI 2lk k Imo— IRRIGATION NOTES District 112 Future High School PRWECTT. Ts, x.vx ,o aen sXa,sx S 1 ■ c. c,x.x»wv w e�rm`sar ososs ,=xar 03U3d] JRP o� J IRRIGATION PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C8.0 1— a m Itj � i I � I TE No@ S DO SILT FENCEs �s1 ENGINEERED FILL C9 1'52l EROSION CONTROL BLANKET V.1 ® '1a .¢e.nem INS "T*NOET.IL .�nm TL 7 i STRNE orrui 1'7'�—_ SEDIMENT LOG Ue 1'4i. ROCK CONSTRUCTION 09 ENTRANCE t ` e � W101 D""F101— islwi.E w�p TEo.o.T*q.... .. /-sl PIPE BEDDING - PVC Ve .�.<.�—.n1o.1+..NT PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP ol I a PIPE BEDDING - cs.1 PERFORATED PVC 9 CATCH BASIN 1N STORM SEWER MANHOLE cae e n RCP FLARED END SECTION cs+ (FES( gm f` t_ v a.,^E[RIPRAP - FLARED END SECTION .. muum ® sg 6� ai / �rtt cF C C8AM8ASSE1 +T GATE VALVE BOX & zz TYPICAL HYDRANT INSTALLATION 14STALLATION cv1 ED T1— LOADING DOCK +e B-612 CURB AND GUTTER cse Irf ti +s B-612 CURB TERMINATOR cs+ z+ STRIPm MAINTENANCE G91 TED t tl h n SURMOUNTABLECURB & c" GUTTER District 112 Future High School P.CTTF ED �I 1 ■ may:.E. e.1a...mm.1. zo CURB CUT f e n CONCRETE WALKISLAB � H6 SITE DETAILS TYPICAL WATERMAIN LOWERING CONCRETE WGUTTER�~� SECTION :E; ° 570 " STEM F REA •. OUTLET CONTROL CONCRETEWALK� CITY SUBMITTAL ��. w G' STRUCTURE (OCS 1( C91 FOR REVIEW ONLY - I ma..m PLAN 1s SANITARY SEWER OUTSIDE cs' DROP MANHOLE Rmo 1 �Rm �1 LIGHT DUTY PAVEMENT 1— - - - - 1 MEDIUM DUTY PAVEMENT PLAYERS BENCH 8 BACKSTOPS - cvi WING EXTENSION [sue ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN '- N AND POST ELEVATON r� �1 HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT f ®">'� 1` �� +T STOP, r T s�,� S r 7 I 'Lai n `�5. - ¢'�Z - "� i , -t L �1 PRCHER'S MOUND BASEBALL FIELD ial SOFTBALL BACKSTOP - --- _ r AGLIME AT GRASS EDGE 'ten+ C9 3 r.5[vt v eslP'iP. Q TRAFFIC SIGN IT b� 4 i5 I$ 11 — [1 BASEBALL BACKSTOP C93 n LIMITED ACCESS GATES cvi AT TENNIS COURTS �p e is DECIDUOUS TEERWITH �• GRATE �z TENNIS COURT FENCING csx AND POSTS +k 1mi,ilin �Ig�1111N1:u Inn LM Wh-..nn..+.n® -..- i• Le- RN—OAMENTAL FENCE SECTION ELEVATION » DRAIN TILE AND IRRIGATION cs.a AT TADIUM FIELD �.. .M. Nt, I PLAN VIENKYMCA11K Rar J ••••••• ^ELEVATpIN os wu:• •••••w nr® rya 9ECIMIN AAA omNE� �•-•`'I -�- 1 -��1 oa1rt8P/+cNlo NoiEB. m � ,•n+o 0 .a..�m �� .,YV � o n.•..•noa.—w+.+-ma.a�a. awae..®+� Is PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP �r ORNAMENTAL GATE nz ELEVATION ie RISER INLET (RI) C9] ao fOUL POLE CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School Pfl ELTTF me+z-.w-amre+zmnv ,41 PH 0 n ao w ro+zmvee man A .�.�..®+-...a.a an srm �/ a��'°tl•im r easam asws � mozo� aoc� SITE DETAILS C9.2 15 �I 1 ( �1x1 _rmnrn r I , DOUBLE SWING GATE LATCH a fr s TRACK RADKNi PONTS y_ _ yy I PI FIELD MARKING PINS a: iil RETAINING WALL PLAN VIEW %x1 SHOT PUT PAD m ,x POLE VAULT�I� PT SECTION VIEW iE CONCRETE STAIRS« DISCUS PAD n' BASEBALL BATTING CAGE DRAIN TILE CONNECTION �1 DISCUS CAGE (L, '�� 1B SHRUB —I we (1 SECXOX AT WPLLANO MOMEBy PAD CHAIN LINK FENCE LONG IT LE JUNP PIT�u� I+'r • ' T n TRACK FIELD EVENT AND TENNIS I cax PAVEMES NT s SINGLE SWING GATE LATCH no u SOFTBALL BATTING CAGE ie CONIFEROUS TREE n,J 9A 4 ssa �a L anc� m DECIDUOUS TREE .�.rt •— _ - XEEEn To scecovee �- RAIN GARDEN JBIORETENTION s RYMFOOTBALL GO AL POST a.a (CANTILEVER) District 112 Future High School PIpJECf TFYI' u•mdn, u.vvu. 1 U N P4iv+.aomn ue at p+6+Aiswv m a+.snas V s+xaanv mmo, Du SITE DETAILS CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C9.3 District 112 Future High School PR ECT iFAN: waWEK.L. ® aaair..wm w wm..�am I f "r.�puwe 111 U���� �v m�lwm •Wvwr2 ^fit-rWa]m • w »»ar r ivaHmn un e:.mve r n�x�mrmn w EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS b ,m FOR REVIEW ONLY I District 112 Future High School PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS - --- TAL FOR REVIEW ONLY 0 v 9 -- — o I ' I �- t -f I II 1 r '-i- Cw FINISH FLOOR ELIFVATONS-FFE: LOWER LEVEL FFE &W.W FIRST LEVEL FFE mw SECOND LEVEL FFE Zw SOOME FOOT CALCOIATpNS- FOOT PRINT SIZE 2W.W7SF LOWER FLOOR MEA 1SZ.WSSF FMT FLOOR MEA 197,1715E SECOND FLOOR AREA 9Z,mw TOTAL FLOORN C ,w SF OVERALL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A101 v 9 9 O 9 I a i 6 I V I l I — -aC I e Tit r II - 1 � I ❑oa � I _ �e s9 B v BUILDING FINISH FLOOR EIEVAT -FEE LOWERLEVEL FM mm FIRST LEVEL FFE WW SEOONO LEVEL FFE 9F M FOOT PRIM SIZE 439.907 SF LOWER FLOOR AREA 10Z.( W FIRST FLW MEA 197.174 SF SECOND FL" AREA 94.0935E TOTAL FLOOR AREA 4MIM7 SF District 112 New High School PR KT,EAY: I P.r,m-14I-, I ie '`m'w.mgm r� man E �wET OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN CrrY P"Ew SET A102 8 e -o I � --}/---{} BUILDING LOWER LEVEL F E M.W _. - _Ya FIRST LEVR FFE MM SECOND IEVEI FFE 981.99 _ - a SOIIgHE FDOT CFLCU TIONS: FWTMINTSRE MOT SF i T x LWER FLOON MEN 1@.Wfi SF FM F9iST BOOR MEN 19].1]65F J- SECONOROOR MFA 92SF TDTNL BOOR MEN 495,W]STSF — ®o n u 9 District 112 New High School MOZCf TFAY: I T, �ul �� r•,nr��r,um )' �NJs .. mse® ymmexm+, 10 - 21 ��FeGAT'A9! Rl N OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN MY REVIEW SET A103 q �e Q 0 0 00 O 4 4 Q O Q Q4 .--- - B ,� _ -- -- - -� - - LID ��SUIIMF3Ei�11Y]Y .,�e 4 4 (�) 9 0 Q) s 4 0 Q 9 0 ® O o' $ Q 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0 %.�EIEV..iION O O O 0 O 0 O O C 6 G G 0 O O 0 0 @ O © © O !l O NININ�NIINIINOIpNNgIIIIMNN1101NANINI1111IN■1.nII�NNI� €RIIs Y M I ui WOOD 12 1 BY , Uk- BY y,Ii L3 -'ig �i ii e y HgyN�?YNfN Iw i=.N�FN�I�iF "'Ins � ,;�3 ii �IIII _� 11 m .T mow: ema.. wa. zmn ®ci ua...nn o+ anu... aaw wzm r.nrto ma ..� r unors-n Bus �r..s, mew, pow-B.r ,uiYw District 112 New High School PNQIECT IFAM: I� na�zm amme�zaeu.ss rm.r+.s.�v s•�z, BFFIMS[ it r >ry n mzxe5r y mszp.m z o �t �(Dz 2FeM/Y AOB wu MY REVIEW SET A301 v nammmun,m mm � ,e u a -a a,varav,. ve.wvv p¢ uva, v ,u4,:u- � a yea uvumm,e m namec av av e, °v°ev ac ¢e ° vaa va vuma ) y,m pyy Nv� mYe evm mna °¢v ee avmmv°eemvv iva v P.aTq of Pa�Y ¢°ammo n�.am � .} � b wia�ua __- deb aO ca ae evm°0.. m,am •m" District 112 Future High School 3®tidid' ms `m m--- --m m m. vi p °mav v°va a ve° e a a VXOJEtT14Y- ea— lnamneme .y ! p'F n RiyOvpt! va cea em n men ea mm " mmmmus, e: eau ,v�•a a , a „+ 1 � waa ,a ,a , c a�av aq,aia� A,a 2S aI .n, a n'e.e •q. , a uLemvem nem °mevmnn ea av ma vuav as vamuavm vv° - — ,•• me,x vra+m re,nsae,Y me mmpe avmv n un -_,a .,�. u.aP.,- -- - ,-v. _, _ v me°meammmnemee e. mnum v°va ve uav a°vv vv as °v ea v a v a samuvv a°vm m v°,v °,e n, ua mvunewvem°umaavv vumv°eva.°ev sv°v°v¢°¢°mvva°,am enmae a°aa v°mvv v°evaam,s ���- nv e°ev me. a.uv : ,ve wvu mav aawun ov e°e°nv m ovv va vamm av°e nn va nv vav ea evm °� a.¢ l , ,v}� 'lA' .bv vv nv vav ev ev vmman ev ea vam mv°nv°°¢ .em¢a ¢am.¢°¢e vemww¢a .I. ¢e a ,aa a a m....w.va � a e me. .° .m..ma mmmnamaaam . a e name. n. aa.m qq m mn m e aaa m _ 'mmeem"::m m::---IImm::. ..:: :`:.:.:. ° a m::::::m:. �� ra>•,...,,A ,.,a.®, O1Nm "naaa°e vemn, maa va na ¢ew namm•mmm°°.an v0M°• v °O Oamn. '° 701e ,em m,-m I. It I—. idaam°mVO.m•..•.a..wmmmm.aaammm..mmma.mmmma. aawmae I. n wmav,® anm m ,, 44 � � �a b .a a,aan.m::mna.aaawaamm,aemmN a..aa°a.m ;.'°aammmmaam°:.aa a,-,.„m..e�,.,m> e, a.. - ... �- .m:A.., a.. m..a � "- aew•a. a.m. m.aaa¢.mma...m..mmmw¢. m..mam...a aa.a ea a. m..mmmm �li� 11 .- , -° m°°. ve°.a nea m,mmmv..m n.mm° ma. ae ae•aa ae ¢e°° a. n. ¢a as., ,°. u:.a�erdw�.� m,d.., v . ..:::e::.:,e..-....,.., :'::::::;v::"::,'°::y..•:.:.a�,ma.m.e,,.,.:::... :::m::.'a` a":�°:m; °::e:mm,e�::::::uu:;:::::�::::�::::::::::mma.mm:::::::::: a°e° a°v eeme.3( •v .c `"mgya6.j.v . 1 ; my mee nv `° ae¢°mmmmvema° n°mva a°vn1. nvvn veuve ame m°vm°°mve nv v°°vmmv° ¢ °„°mm a 1. nnn v mn a,me2i ,. ¢amv e,vvm¢a ¢e va en°eem °.a nem vva mv.:v a same.mmaa a°av v°va °. ee ne _ an eemv e:v m¢, IT °1 va,° ve nemea am vaam _ mm wp vv.e a v°vnmmmn°mv°ve a, ae ne °°w vv ¢°vem aem v ea av avvmev °an vv v v v vm v All nemme °menu mne a •uuae. a, `9 °` umvemn°mn°vemm;0:° uav ee avmm meav a m i a ti a vem vn ve na vv °wmev ra vrm"mmve v° °m mm mvem mv°v. em•a ,umeem nem ,avr6v,:ahv6xraau nE e ev a, ne n,u mee nv i a a° my m umvv----a°nv ¢e as ec aavuav av [,mmwan °°na amnv ea em•, e • ma°muusa a, e a e o aauvem m vvev°emuvn ev aue u°v aavmmmmmmvu m;a avv vm°nmm • O1 •'mmmVmm av em ,a `u vemm°emune avmvv °° m omma°sa°u:: nv ea war, °a°wv°vemmnn n° ,b q m mne ve ¢°mvv a¢a v °°vmm¢v a°¢en eqp a° v°¢am ¢e evm 1 - mv. v: av °¢v vemmmw a v°¢e mma° vv ¢4 ,vn ne n°ve va ae a mmmwma I.I II ° e °¢°a, av ¢v avmnv ee eemv m ay°,i a:m ,e va a ° eav °a vv vv m°0 ¢a 'vauma°°vmum v a; 11 mp; llo.1'¢: + ' mav ,°O v a' nn mna nvuve a°v°°eve e`cmea as mee ¢°°, ve v°a 'I ° `:,,m,. as °...., .a aen a.m ,a„_,, °°, ... ,..ve n,>am„a, av ammo, :D y ., ameem•°an°°¢.m..mw nm maem wm¢a a+.a .,w,a.a m.ammaemwma ..am 4­1 °' a°°aaa..°°°. ..mv. a: .v, a. a, mq �mm emmmwme. ,. a.mmmm„n.m.ammne n.n ♦t ' .,mm.,....a,mmw•ee•ma.•e,°`"°: °a ..m•amm..••mmm°, •e a°..n .amn _ namm •mwn ..°e .mad ' mmmaa maa ...a ae namn.maa m.a ¢a.e aem:::° %.. .•a*. m' a,ma°na aa'a as as •. ¢a as°aa m.::: v.a .a as as aa. as ..a .. p�m';. a¢. a::•..wm•. n°na ae a.m m... m:e:. �.'. v. ¢a..m a.m ° ,melm ,`.�'.`m aaa, •` a°.w •mma..m m.a..m m` m° ma.mmaa .. w..m _��_ I ' p. m` .. ,. .. .a ..ma: °v: a: a...a ::m °aa w.. as a..a :.mm.am as :: as a. m.a a `�'°• mmm.. n, `.mm""•: "..m m¢e as ..• ..•m n. na as ,. �I __ � ��, neau� -°mn a n„ maa aeme: ana as as a..a .a:: °m..::":: a° ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN p°:w v a,. a•:::."a ma,: •...:.:a ::::::.,mm':'"°•m:.::.e .. Y` + a:. >,",:•..::wm,:::..•v: m. ----- �> ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN — :: , e a a� ➢w em.a,vaan'�m°: :: :: :; ° a::°:: PHOTOMETRICS y' m,amm..aam.,.,weva.mm..aa..m.a.ay.mmmmammme, me,m¢..vave.awm mmmmm..m.. .¢ana 77 m..ymmmmmaam.:mwmmmmmm„mmea, mma.mmmm .mt,ma.,:.mwma.aaa..,m a mmvammmm e a ::m::m::v. m : usmc a ma m mw — mmw ne¢aa.maa..w.am "ma, a.m aw wm mmaamw ma E010P LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE .n.� .� .e.� 2.a'— 11O'e wa.: am.m m ww m J �+ ELECTRICAL STADIUM PLAN �.a4.0 aym ac v �Ye a4e nova noh ¢g'a° w�Kw a va uY �+m an.ama, a.mm m.¢aem ° ..we ... m. as am.a m n,wI. I. m .nnI- It +��•""Ybm ca av>°na s•n a It Ileav a=...vem¢v A meay,m a m n nmle I. I¢ m am I,°°?ve --v°w .m ° °a upam • v¢nmm v. na va n e e,ea ... vm+ema• aa- uv mmmaxuua vamvw n °a v ma°m mac a•av avmmmav as ae ¢° w av va s,pa m na • • • m,. m•nvnn mea °a ••vvnan waa =n av NOTE: PHOTOMETRIC VALUES SHOWN REPRESENT THE SITE LIGHTING ASSOCIATED W'.TH THE SATE PARKING LOT WALKWAY, AND BOLLARD LIGHT FIXTURES ONLY. THE LIGHTING ASSOCIATED , me..�,m m;e amea mq ¢ ,¢ ¢, a, a, •° .mn,n n•¢n , •, a,°°w ° n n W;TH THE STADIUM FIELD LIGHT FI%TUBES, BUILDING MOUNTED .a, a:a ¢mrs.ma..awmmmma<mm oa a.. ¢y .a ex , m a-ww.awmaa n.ww....... a a aas aw LIGHT FIXTURES, BDILD!NG ACCENT FLOOD LIGHT FIXTURES el c= +I .!'Ill III ee>,:, + .a.. ••a. w.e=•=aw.=••••+•+• • _ ••_ ^° IS NOT INciILDEc w. aay.• mY.0 ,mem.a.eva°emamea mw+'y.e.�m••.mmamn 11 emn., 11 vw:.mmvw io4,lea::..mm mvsun.mmwnaa.,..a -. _x ww It mmaa an a. It saemee:;aameeeva::;;e a. a.ma, w aaawa. m.p ¢4a. ............... °" °° waa ¢a a. vow m a., as aa.a m.e va a.m wne.a n. na a. ae vv nv a..°.Sw a..amw m..e ?�. -�-� - - hle .aa ° mwn, >e b a �w.a °me.macnvwwwma°a¢.°•'°.a sew ¢e a.ma. a,mmmm a• • v v •va vv m°°mme s vav •°•v v v e up • a y. 4aaaIt Itmw,v v. ew nm•mmva vwmav •avw`a vvm aammvmm¢avav • ev. nn eea eam a . v°av evc w ae`ae'¢ vn av na vv a=mmn°m n ° a v v n , enav ve +v ay. av nv as mvv pm v pe mm a v ve° v a vav ° . °ae mpa¢ • aWm wav namgv vv anv •a mmm•e+.mmma.mvn mnnmw a a. u.¢.0 ay° .+n. av e°w nv va e m v •mm aa'lF ea m .nva a vaov nv mmmmm vm,.m nn •mmaa w ¢.0 Im as ° c va mn. v.w a + v, m a• ¢.myu mqv v}a� ¢•va W'w ax v . as m.am m¢v,• aammmma.wne ¢nmm •a. av vvuvua•m • a.mn. v. ea a•a. na •avvva, en eea a•°. •d uv.>nty uQu• v n +• exveomss-a.m°a ea a•avvx°mvv a¢a•a•mva av av v¢vv It, elle •dmy. • a ne av nano ma ae v,umevea •a°mewx<e enea v va n (f ° m mV P?fam m avewmva ¢a a•m°n ae a••n vvm ° .ev nu mm x •en •ea.aan•a•an.•a•wmv, as as vv ,. n•ev avvu n.0 va.w• t4sym n¢ v ev vnm ° a. +emmmmaaumaaus,•,n an °m °°m ..a ot°m vnv en ma n • va vane vav¢e®-• v . vvv ¢. ¢•an av nv n ae. vySv a e mNa °avymv m .emmv.vna vv va wove sv a• ammaa mme. ev mvv •aa ¢=s°e. °, en ve env ea v va vewea v. °°ev ev vv° av ea can aN a, °e ee ¢e new. •.a va ¢°v¢.em av nn ev va avv e v von ev n•°v °e as +° carom v°vss vm xv 1. °1 1. 1. e.°va vn ca. v>.•a° aI av °• aav •e va a. v 6°y pw c p=a • +a va •°enm. av•av I. .a na°°° I, It aew I. e. n. ¢• e. aen pea n, ee, a. .m eve ve a ad a ,bceu a>a+4 as a.,mwy� a•a av m. m6e ev.m • vanes ae aa• ° °•a + a°°¢aa na n yiam .mMa• noa a n°n. I. Itvw na I. m mn_m• v. v e een ne • vv as va 4-v a.a Loa ma°m¢ e=•°aa mnv .n as vna a nev av v ••, vmmmav mmve as m•• v va• a•m.n vaw •aav m vv .e ae <wmva•a°ev e. av u. ,n .°mava an.•mm m .e. eves mmme•maa aumaamna a. - x, a+u °. nv ea v°mna na •.a ,a•ma. +gv ,• a vox e• ma•w.ev ex ae .r _ ¢emm .m ummum avam a .,° a .¢. a.maevmv v.,•s. n. va va ¢¢a. an m mvemve • as na ve a•nv vemae aav p I, N s. m,au„na an• +,m a••ame.mmvaueam I. unv v°ev av e was ¢.m•¢exn + w ¢mm - wvvuuaar-¢svune n•mae a. nn aamma•uma. anmv - 1.emm I. I. m an a•n, na avm up•u •nv ¢vunVam �qe4 I. uu mmaa I. a� •{pu B a,w aa'v na •n °•w m uaaw m6ev an I. m + ¢soma°Ile I. me°muvv I. v m m men mm v vv + u ma m ma emmmm n.0 mme.ummae wbe ee .¢•v° d2S my ax�yn nn I n m m • mvama as av •e aamw , •ae a.•ee e. e° noes anae+p a `e, w Y ;- ° mm+ wm ve a.wmaa m.am .an em a m ItIle - ' a--- amm a - b wa.ma..amaa n. a.wm a vam a mmmae e. av vaw .ed c¢ar¢rm vo-a°s.a...-on en w,m-v.mmnT-m na ova ,an nqm as ee v°m°1Km°ym;S. a.v ea Ii v e v •n m • as m ae s,m wv ve ¢°av a•¢v as ae aav a aa.c v.•°. _. a mTgd a¢ ae mmm am ne nam min mmaemaxw I. I. •an n.mwmee avmmex ea e°va an It I. vve vamaa a..=ex ee,..e vaw e, +e.eeweaammee ea dy. 1mine. a. e. ee °. ,. °..° 11 a, 1. 1. It.n n It,aevaaaem I, III e.maa ne ve ve v. va as ee ea. e , ,ae esemmmae n, roes ee•mwee av ae¢ann.uue..e ax av a. 00meemw ummma•aauw•n �a. . .va,. aav ...1aaa>muqua. nx.,I °.°a.n...au..a�e1w.L�n a vum umeveemwna save vam,awm le I It mae ?vaw m °p'.m le le •<wa°maIt ne na - ue vs ma It °°_ (p cy q> ¢•mwaa av •a va as ¢v an - d qa Aid w n }:;w, ¢.A w4+laa -.: sgT Yam. - sya. .. nnaaa e +• aD w n' 1 x C%i +dF.. gwu4k 'eiM ad:, tr ti. :ni '. alloy+• y%• a , m • ev m tieve It I. T a J yyr 4 h. I. m, w I.a �v Iva. ... ,_,y a_y>, . a.mmlv.,d« . . I. aj% m .. ex ..mmm.. Ile. -se r ,. .•++-:, m ,mmmm trees as m mwm min C.Ya v° mavn.v +°av ¢.vaamm as .e . e -y .��.. lbea,6. Id � 14 • e It 4 , ,,,i4°4. Q54 a ell T., a waa . e av es . I. I. aMa A 3lleet.e. p a°a.mev ueaevvv d L min, w I V -t ♦ vm d y p aw y yym T 3ii5 B•- m_'— male 4.m-a• °i mex mmm m m:amee; ::;.ax e ee.x.,n...: } a m w L� :;min aeee. ;esa.a "AtIt IT dpdke Ys. ¢. mae eamv ¢-AlthYr e.� r a. n,mae It I. It It as a ,m xcnTM EL-CTRICAL SITE PLAN_ /� District 112 Future High School Mlrr.CTTF '4� vimf�oma�x.e•e�s ® r.°e.tm mffininm l U 1. I uumWiv.saew,�.l9NN I CMR!� pKcfDSFwunw rv. w 1 ra.aasaxe -_. /-T� ` d1� FEBRUMYI.2D]ly1 ELECTRICAL STADIUM PLAN — PHOTOMETRICS CITY SUBMITTAL E011 P 985 - _-.____ _ _- _.__.- 980 985 985 975 _NORTHWEST 975 965 I PARKING LOT. _ ..__._ _ _ - _-. -. - _970 960 - r _. -.- - - - _.. __ _. _ .--. _.... .__ ._... - __ _... -,..965 955 _.. ._� _. _.®_.-.. _ _.. ._.:.: ._.� _-�...._ __ ' 950 _.__ --_.. _.960 �� 955 945 950 940 _-" 945 935 --__ 940 930 __-_ _ _. _ 935 925 - .-___-__.._- .__-____.-_- __- -_ --__ --._-_...-_._. _._-______-_____-_ 935 920 i - _... _._ 925 t _ _ _ _ _. __. _- ..- 920 910 915 905 ----- 910 900. __ w _... .._..� _u_ _ _ _ .... _ _- ___ _` 905 895- ---,. 890 885 _ __._ _ -- _ - _- _ - -.- _ __ _..__u _ �- - - ... ___. '- - -i- - �. .. _ _ -._ ._ _ _ _ 900 895 _ _ 890 - - _�� �. _ __ - _ ___ __ 885 880 -_ _ - _. - v_ v. ,.-_ _ .._Y -. 880 875 _-_ ?_._ _-_- -__ -_ _-_- _- __— ___. __ _—;._ .. 870 -. .__— 8875 75 8+00 _---- 9+nn ;Ann 985 875 870 14+00 15+00 985 980 975 970 965 960 955 950 945 940 935 930 925 920 915 910 905 900 895 890 885 880 875 870 -PROPOSED NEW -: HIGH SCHOOL - )POSED _-..__._ .._....__ _. ARM BASIN 3 --- -`- 16+00 __ :_-_ --- 17+00 _.. __..._ -: __— 18+00 New Chanhassen High School Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road I It•N-A Rozeboom Miller Architects Inc. 244 First Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 ph: 612-332-2110 fax: 612-664-8152 _- --__ �_- --- -- ----- --- -�__ 975 970 Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. ------------- --------- 965 7575 Golden Valley Road -- -- ---- - �-t- '---- 960 955 Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 ph: 763-544-7129 ---- -------- ---- 950 945 -- - -- -. - -------i 940 ------- -----------------....--- 935 fax: 763-544-0531 _ ------- _______ 930 925 920 915 910 905 4__ _. 900 895 890 -- -- ___ -- 885 880 875 - 870 PROJECT 157.001.00 scu 1" = 10' 985 980 DATE 11/01/06 975 970 DRAWN DAR 965 95o SITE PROFILE esu CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 875 870 EX. 10, Lit .-AaO AW,r F�f 1 :i NOTES: �. istq,o NRE, u,. wavrw.ux.,a. ePxau.v� District 112 Future High School PRQIECTIFAY: I� iy a�nY4<�4 M t.x®v,[K�p9 m, Ys.b.�sa 1 A, imww kmii,w, •q, ma,�a�m se&v,Y91A ,inn v V F. e�hA�486 SITE RETAINING WALL PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY C3.5 r FBALI 3 \ SOCCER 4 Owner: a* GFTBAI Chaska Public Schools 2 Independent School District 112 11 Peavey Road Chaska, Minnesota 55318 952-556-6100 Zoning: Existing: A-2 (Agricultural / Estate) Proposed: 0-1 (Office / Industrial) Parcel Size: 4,131,752 Square Feet (94.83 Acres) Proposed Building Size: Gross Floor Area: 406,209 Square Feet Surface Coverage: Building Footprint: 242,365 Square Feet (5.56 Acres) 5.86% OF SITE Additional Impervious Surfaces (Lots, Drives, Walks, Athletic Facilities): 835,000 Square Feet (19.2 Acres) 20.25% OF SITE Proposed Wetland Alteration: Existing On -Site Wetlands: 1,071.500 Square Feet (24.6 Acres) Proposed Wetland Filling: 73,423 Square Feet (1.69 Acres) Proposed Wetland Construction (1.5:1): 111,000+/- Square Feet (2.55 Acres) Proposed Upland Buffer Construction (0.5:1): 37,000 Square Feet (0.85 Acres) Total Proposed Constructed/ Dedicated Wetlands @ 2:1 Req'd: 148,000 Square Feet (3.4 Acres) Number of Parking Spaces Provided Including Handicapped 920 Spaces CBA e. f'€N LEGEND REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS 1 DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP) C9.1 SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM) C9.2 HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT 0 MEDIUM DUTY PAVEMENT 2 E9.2 LIGHT DUTY PAVEMENT C9.2 TRACK AND FIELD EVENT AND TENNIS COURT PAVEMENT 11 C9.3 AGLIME INFIELD @92 - } CONCRETE WALK 21 C9.1 NATIVE SEEDING 0 60 120 --------- --- — . --- _--------- WETLAND. . MITIGATION j AREA #5 (11,471 SF) WETLAND MITIGATION EXISTING AREA #6 WETLAND (12,883 SF) _ BI HFF CREEK WETuxD EASEMENT SHOT PUT ,ER-,3 (3) ^ aoo J y'c OQ O fi EXISTING WETLAND ®*® q I r T =T 5 ' 1 ei�: e Is 44 0 . =G I ■ 1IQ11 J ®I SOFTBALL — j 1! 1 i SOCCERI WETLAND MITIGATION AREA #4 (39,508 SF) 9 WETLAND EASEMENT Dz r STORM BASIN 3 WL 89100 HWL=895.9C ®®$ d O 4 ' �.a ®000000 ® r p p0 EXI TING • p WETLAND € '_ BUS CORRAL r LROP-OFF (30 BUSES) $ EVENT PARKING --' (140 STALLS) , 1 PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL O (PEEERTO ARCH SHEETS) [ • • • O t O 0 0 -_L 000 0 PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL 6 I� (REFER TH ARCH SHEETS) e (! `. ERVIC I S OP AR A r) S �q L LA PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL (REFER D HIGH SC DROP-OFF N'1Fv l� N� .+ — d f / jr e r f �'. STORM BASIN 1 \;. NWL = 934.00 FUTL HWL=935.9898 — ONI SIGN w EXISTING ,����� ��..,;. �,,,.,,✓.," WETLAND �J �a�C3SQ` rT NG L ( TALL f f ~Y r i i ��yv fi 0 4 ape ✓'°r.' pp a :r WETLAND ?r I MITIGATION L AREA#1 ! (31,014 SF) e ' A C1 � WETLAN MITIGATION AREA #3 ' EXISTING (16,302 SF) ' WETLAND / /,3+" 3 N ' STORM BASIN 2 NWL=919.00 HWL=921.09 � (..gutter 8Nd' e SUM 9t `' Z. V , 96th- k i p y� + �� ... 4- ? i1 SITE LOCATION MAP 1 C.) District 112 Future High School PROJECT TEAM: �y` IUDUBON i4 ARCHITECT Miller Architects Inc. 244 Fir 244 First Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 ph:612-332-2110 fax:612-664-8152 R•N-A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT �s.1� Bossardt Corporation ��TT�� 8585 West 78th Street, Suite 100 ■I"��� Minneapolis, Minnesota 55438 !■ ' ph:952-831-5408 fax:952-831-1268 GP CIVIL ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. _ 7575 Golden Valley Road, Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 ph:763-544-7129 fax:763-544-0531 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Heyer Engineering, PC P.O. Box 7397 Fargo, North Dakota 58109 ph:701-280-0949 fax:701-280-9686 MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL ENGINEER Hallberg Engineering 1750 Commerce Court White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 ph:651-748-1100 fax:651-748-9370 FOOD SERVICE CONSULTANT j Dennis Hahn & Associates :.' 311 Fourth Avenue South C, ' Sartell, Minnesota 56377 ph:320-259-6557 fax:320-529-8905 THEATER CONSULTANT Schuler Shook 123 Third Street North, Suite 210 Minneapolis, MN 55401 ph:612-339-5958 fax:612-337-5097 SOUND & ACOUSTICS CONSULTANT Kvernstoen, Ronnholm &Associates 2444 Bryant Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55405 ph:612-374-3800 fax:612-374-3133 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DANIEL L. JOHNSON Reg. No. 17279 Date 02-02-07 KEY PLAN REVISIONS 06085 1" = 120' 02-02-07 JRP DLJ District 112 New High School SHEETORAWINOLIST I...... CIVIL: ARCRRECNML: ELECTRICAL'. DII"N2 New High School IE r9nr�u�e�Sso�auresw.w�� � T, rzrwu 1'�pA4 1 2r TITLE SHEET INDEX - CITY REVIEW SET A000 j fY Izi�af�fe .F.FI 3F � his {ii t/1` �:% tes�ax�l11 � a�_ F{g t9i age 3d . �:t: 'ai i {s9 �fH•F {� Eaj _ - � ig^ 94'e �P z 2'.tl f#- g{{ °31}a=i11{ 1 3-3 1d'-t 3P$!,i F� �f a• P# ��.P..(s lEs; �; £ :t j�l,l#^#a�$iFPIHi • *31H#31s 11 di Eay E3'is°F•xii^ e # x°aRs �tfi'P.,H.1 ��Eei iP e€s.�,x -s e P H€ 3 Ha H • ^; � asts '' g $ i s - 1" zs �PI ' h•fl ['!'� 1�°z=a.• 3 jj xs g� aP � f% H a# � i �&F'P�{`ff$�pi,E � P#f#•k z:a�gls[z[tE °$$c'i4 6;1P9E; ;='$�;$P#I;i3 i�tt�&HIIIdHf1Ef'=1� I�E;H j{ igH# ; € �. 3a EeeaesP�{:a#ii;F �PIH� E��1 �9:ati,irPl°I6 fsd l Itta$s �15 +xs#.s vysp[[IE I f;€ i Pg $ 8 Fg f° �a$` P � { ;a$'.r f`I s1 f^jjHP#!; a{ H#cf sa HIE i9, S gE . 3Fry$ Pxi`tHa61F 1 }zt x "11 H a - ' Hp it; a I,s s$; -fH Pj:ii 1,H#;H( (€i 'P; ie;xFag)t,# ; H=stfsxf"x3ij �I' iff€ t # !P+ a=a tjzaa F$r $ H-: g•e i r_ pj S [4 �$�3 �• F a H'�-, t 1 / }� A {.r: s H- ` # !¢Pfaieifs ii H SIB 11�s- `teHll�s�:A#PRaad'a# tsxi3 r ep H #; }HI` {-1 --# ; ` !}} E• f ;°1' E4 €yP{ (# F3 ize #:i 1E ¢.-[3 e 1 ei1E1 ' tai NIB !;I!! A+ aP Px$Pa:Pili III Z11"Ill! 3? {III ii'I Yfs !sa.HHl?iEHHf FsP xilaH£: �Ex[a{alt Ir,'; $ i s 3 ' # F e t FF{gg ! $HealII�aE€gt=PyP1P#€EIIIIlii3s#=i`tgl 1�;HPI�Sa1d;E�iill�i#$11�:!!�i�41E e$�IFS�IZF I e8Ee36aa4f's;c3EFPci'Y4irHHH:&eprs�45pi 9Hi£H$'� e I I I I `fEl(a IP F � g €#1 , all k •al x l a �P P i sl LEGEND NOTED w. p tl m CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School n REMOVALS PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School am.mmrrea� arum®u.�.�asam mma.r,®ran SITE GEOMETRIC PLAN L i m—ATcmmo, -;� ,urc» 2 . YXWWIO MNINNIapaaL -- y _ ' fr 1 NOTEti XPI CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future Hlah 4 SITE GEOMETRIC PLAN , \ - - , Oistrict 112 SchoolFuture High All 1 4 ((� r. z r n : -i 0 1 �I mmj NOTES ... � 1 .. 'y � / e' �. - — o a� 1al r SITE GEOMETRIC PLAN __ -n__ wArcriu¢r—� CITY SUBMITTAL ^ Q G I FOR REVIEW ONLY M1tCXUXE f) MRTCXUXEM District 112 Future High School nrlWf i _. n .A. ......•.,a.,..r��..n.,.. b.� `I Y SITE GEOMETRIC PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY ('j2XL4 � 1 Nam a� LEGEND _ I � i -- - I 1 _-__ -- SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School alea�a a PLAZA FINISHING PLANS II District 112 �.I Future High School rta IRRIMMN NMS: CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY IRRIGATION PLAN rril ,SILT FENCE�TM EROSION CONTROL^-L~BLANKET •«,ROO6C NST✓RUCTION ENTRANCE C ENGINEERED FILL PIPE BEDDING - PVC ,«n..... a..'STURM SEWER STORM SEWER MANHOLE PIPE BEDDING P6OW m. PIPE BEDDING - PERFORATEDPVC �\ RCP FLARED END SECTION (FES GRATE DETAIL w �s PLAN SECTION t -I RIPRAP FLARED END SECTION I RIPRAP SWALE rT TYPICAL WATERMAIN LOWERING 2!TE VALVE BOX 6 INSTALL 1ION I v s B412 CURB AND GUTTER 8-612 CURB TERMINATOR LOADING DOCK SURMOUNTABLE CURB6 GUTTER �CURISCVT j /72 \ CONCRETE WALK w.. CONCRETE WALKISSLAB CONCRETE V-GUTTER....... CITY SUBMITTAL FOR REVIEW ONLY District 112 Future High School !RC■FGi![A�. SITE DETAILS 1 i ® N N 3`ix 1l1€i° EE,S5?iigLcSS {a1i: V LU x a J> 1 1x � I� R ' .. }i{ 1 _ I 6 U O it �57. a if diliap if I } so _ 0 1 °ex EaE?�ai w a d, FxI IE lip EE p I d it l �Ilda I� € I{1 �# e A ! E F E �lEE I{ 01 {� € Ed�il d l #'e�E{ ° {F E d �t o {yt �i ii31E ii9E'1 ' xi eLL � 9 S it 25 d 3 IN S.i i'• F ieEE }e Ix ii - . d1S v ! ° 11 1p x 1 ¢ — ! °e f n.T,�..c��. 13 il¢ {}E Ed� � a di � � � �i If Will 114 ° E F W } ii 11 ° i C d ! xi p } :¢: coaai 1} a 1adal: ®c o ate` l]LL �I� �® �6 � � "A�.V •'� _iafF? 7 ER � F— J FZ to W rI Hijjti � F Q ac y'1 � f gwg a E sFe i Fa 'k if lF!�ia u a ' p aI ?aap'9`ig ?j r i! 7 r-r E u ii fila!iiM! _ IT It'1I1I k I.?j aI iaE� Ir+ I - E ii=i? 14- :?9 I i ;y. YIN IE ++ +!+ a p = iilirl @ If i!• ea ill I �;i I m !l IE! ----------------------- ...... 120 11 I= IV Ito to 1 7 Lot ZT: 0 0:7 ILI T OEM 11 1101= 0:0 1011 :1 .......... ................ 7" --------------- Distriet 112 FutureHNh tat ....... ------ WOW 0—t7:001 .. . =�W-K q j=v ................. f 0 Q- Is If' polio FRI ------------- n: I I I I TOM THAV; Q ygypygypElly; 1 -----jjjj ----------- st- ZZ01=1#1 ................................. ---------- ...... 11 Filippo 4 0:11 ----------------------------------------------- -W I z It &W a Its to: I Ill= YNT:==1 :100000=701: its! 1 'ZIS107=10=1 ....... "Fs ma wim; i 1 gj Easy: cast: ==:;:wi� ----------------------------------------------- ..................... IV= ImmH AF11 --------------- ................... ........... g " Loyyyyy ................... v; 21271===13=1 var Finvin 00:1135 ----------- MOVIE =1Z mulls:proryloy"I'li ......... --------------- -------- ------ Moz toa --- ....... .................. ............. ----------------- .............. aVV-aVV.s .............. —4— ............. szo M TEO AFFIFT Folio w:wAFF�'HF-'..'F ol'-1 i WyEggo: I Islas z ............... ll-a a FEE TEO . ................... ------------- as ------------ so:------------ Fill? F FT i :=:: ---11 --------- - n ......... -12Tw:7=n3= ----------------- --- ------- as ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN - is 2 111 E 1 E E HE 1 No Nil PHOTOMETRICS E i E E E HE a L 001111: a :2 a 5 : r I ............ CITY SUDMJiTAL E 0 11 () Fp ',,CNVVALI.if'; iIiCWN r1 'WE ­�l � 'ILI 1 W I . I H E 1,1 r Pl Nt� I T. WA: K VA S, .. r' L,HT F � -JRE$ �LY 'HE I CA9W 1 �501 4TED F' 11.1Y IIE-L LIGHT &IIIIING W,IfEl; ....................... �HT F,X brql`., HO�;)ljG A(;GENT riQ00 WTHI Xlw� s —I: Nl-)T NCU.TC w .... .. ..... .. .. . .. .. .. .... tau ........... .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . ........... Z . INv ....... .... .YI.. .. ..... ....... . ...... rFn ........... n .. ..... ... ............. ............. 1 ELECTRICAL SITE PI -AN District 112 Fulum High School Ell. ELECTRICAL STADIUM PLAN - PHOTOMETRICS GIV SUMTLAL E011P NEW HIGH SCHOOL - CHANHASSEN, MN PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Per Warranty Deed Document No. 148445) That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast comer thereof, thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north lineof said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest comer thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be decribed, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. SCANNED Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest corner of the the above described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. SCANNED NEW HIGH SCHOOL ISO #112 CHANHASSEN,MN BOSSARPT (:ORPORATION Profeseionnl Construction Services CITY FUNDED WATERMAIN UPCHARGE UPCHARGE ITEM QUANTITY U/M UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 10" DIP TO 18" DIP 4107 LF $32.00 $131,424.00 10" TEE TO 18" TEE 6 EA $1,800.00 $10,800.00 10" VALVE TO 18" VALVE 2 EA $1,600.00 $3,200.00 LYMAN JACKING FOR DIP 70 LF $300.00 $21,000.00 TOTAL $166,424.00 8585 West 78th Street - Suite #100 - Minneapolis. MN 55438 - (612) 831-5408 - Fax (612) 831-1268 CMAA C..—MmsB Am'i .uf A. SCANNED - ' 'Mikos.__ view West from Ly4sn Boulevard i 0 09NNVOS Iloilo view West of main entrance at dawn NEI �� Rims 9 n ff v CIllOF MEMORANDUM rulmuli r1l TO: Robert Generous, Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: February 22, 2007 Administration Phone: 9521100 SUBJ: Site plan approval for Chanhassen High School Fax:952.227.1110 Building Inspections Planning Case: 07-06 Chanhassen High School Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 I have reviewed the site plan for the above project. In order to comply with the Engineering Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire code or Phone:952.227.1160 city ordinance/policy requirements. The site plan is based on the available information Fax: 952.227.1170 submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted, the appropriate Finance code or policy items will be addressed. Phone:952227.1140 Fax:952,227.1110 1. A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, Park & Recreation trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. Phone: 952 227.1120 This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by Fax:952.227.1110 firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 2. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be Fax: 952.227.1404 installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of Planning & Ratural Resources protection are provided. Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax:952.227.1110 3. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the Public works imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather 1591 Park Road driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.3. Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 4, yellow curbing and "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required. Contact Senior center Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of Phone:952.227.1125 signs to be installed. Fax: 952.227.1110 Web site 5. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs www.ci.chanhassen.nnn.us must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.4. g:\safety\fire\plrev07-06chanhassenhighschwI The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gieal place to live, work, and play. MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner FROM: Jerritt Mohn, Building Official DATE: February 16, 2007 SUBJ: Site Plan Review for: Chanhassen High School Planning Case: 07-06 I have reviewed the plans for the above project and offer the following comments. These comments should be included in the conditions of approval. 1. The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 2. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls). 4. Retaining walls plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 5. The utility plans (marked preliminary) were not reviewed. 6. A detailed building plan review cannot be done until complete plans are provided. G/PLAN2007 Planning Cases/07-06 Chanhassen High School/buildingof7calcommems.doc Feb•28. 2007 11:00AM AX INC 6125440531 No•2513 P. t/1 ANDEBSON-JO®VSO WC LL4DSCAPEAFCTIiIBmw . Sr=PGtw'+m�o . a;u F_ d� TRANSMITTAL ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 7575 Golden Valley Road, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55427 763-544-7129 Fax: 763-544-0531 www.ajainc.net To: Steve Von Bargen Date: February 28,2007 Company: Right -of -Way Administrator Enclosed: Plans From: Carrie Stern Comm. 06085 Office Manager No. Project: New Chanhassen High School cc: Bob Generous (cover only) COMMENTS: Mr. Von Bargen, Please find enclosed one full-size set of drawings (Site Reference, Grading and Retaining Wall plans) for your review and approval. If you have questions or need further information please feel free to contact our office. Thanks - Carrie To: Company: From: Project: ANDERSON-JORMON ASSOCIATES INC Z U5 LNDSC�.-IFGwTEmT • &? P"%N• Om EhGL\EFA TRANSMITTAL ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 7575 Golden Valley Road, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55427 763-544-7129 Fax: 763-544-0531 www.ajainc.net Mr. Bob Generous Date: February 5, 2007 Senior Planner City of Chanhassen Enclosed: Carrie Stern Comm. No. New Chanhassen High School cc: COMMENTS: CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 0 5 2007 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT City Submittal Materials 06085 Please find enclosed the following materials for the above indicated project: • I Ix17 set of drawings • 8 sets of architectural renderings • CD with the electronic drawings in pdf format If you have questions or concerns please feel free to contact our office. Thanks - Came SCANnO Voice I Data I Internet I Wireless I Entertainment February 7, 2007 Mr. Robert Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Generous: i - GEIVEF FEB 9 200 311TYOFCHANHASSE EMBARQ Embarq Corporation 343 East 82vd Street Chaska, MN 55318 EMBAR4.com I received your letter dated February 5 h, 2007 regarding District 112 New High School. I see no problems, just wanted to let you know that Embarq has a fiber cable east to north side of Audubon Road. Thanks, Victoria A. Raines Network Engineer Embarq Corporation 343 E. 82nd Street Chaska, MN 55318 RECEIVED = ® CenterPoint Energy Robert Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 690 City Center Drive, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN. 55317 MAR 1 5 Z007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RE: Planning Case 07-06 Chanhassen High School Dear Mr. Generous: 700 West Linden Avenue PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 March 13, 2007 Referencing the proposed high school, CenterPoint Energy, a division of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., owns and operates a 6-inch diameter natural gas pipeline located in easements on the east end of the property. The first easement number 1960-84, was recorded October 28, 1960 in Book 61 of Deeds on page 490. The second easement number 1960-92, was recorded October 28, 1960 in Book 61 of Deeds on page 499-500, Carver County, Minnesota. CenterPoint Energy has reviewed the plans sent recently and hereby approves the plan Commission number 06085 dated 2-2-07. This approval is based on only the exiting plans. This approval is intended as an isolated exception. Any future situations or encroachments must be evaluated on an individual basis. Should maintenance of this pipeline ever require excavation, CenterPoint Energy may have to remove a portion of the encroachments, depending on the urgency. CenterPoint Energy would not be responsible for replacement of anything removed. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 612.321 .5381. Respectfully, CENTERPOINT ENERGY `- V 4, Steven Von Bargen Right -of -Way Administrator Pc: Andrew Balgobin, Administrative Engineer Dale Sodahl, Design Technician 11_ O-7-(�to ,CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 02/13/2007 9:11 AM Receipt No. 0034665 CLERK: katie PAYEE: ISD 112 ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11 PEAVEY ROAD CHASKA MN 55318 CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL PLANNING CASE 07-06 ------------------------------------------------------- Use & Variance 5,625.00 Sign Rent 200.00 Recording Fees 200.00 Wetland 275.00 Total Cash Check 5686 Change 6,300.00 0.00 6,300.00 0.00 SCANNED I\DEI:t.NPc:\T SCHOOL DISTRICT 112 - CHASKA, \IS 55318 BUILDING FUND :account Number Invoice P/O # Amount Disc Paidl .064.840.000.00590.000 APP FEES 6,300.00 ',300.00 /-:ndor 15021 Voucher 00606 2/08/07 5686 Check Total 6,300.00 scr,i,i.cu PLEASE PRINT Applicant Name Contat Phone Email: CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Fax: Planning Case No. UI —U('V RECEIVED FEB 9 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Owner Name and Address: Contact: Phone: 9sz ssd �24 Fax: 95-.2-SSG -�zG 9 Email: E' NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment s. \ 9 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 6JZ5 Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development' _X Rezoning 7,46 Sign Permits Sign Plan Review 5_'DD Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (VAC) 7� Variance (VAR) $ ZAti Weiland Alteration Permit (WAPy L?n< Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign - $200 (City to install and remove) ,. Filing Fees/Attorney Cost' Site Plan Review (SPR)`;51 C,'" j L!{�^� y , - $50 CUP/SPRNACA/ARIILV�/Metes &Bounds - $450 jMiinor SUB gDo Subdivision' TOTAL FEE $/—�or�C4# SkO%10 An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital co pv in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tif) format. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. SCANNED Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS, INC. PROJECT: Chanhassen High School RFP # 22 - BP#3 DATE: 8/21 /07 PAGE: 1 of 1 RMA Commission Number: 137.011.00 OWNER: Independent School District 112 District Education Center 11 Peavey Road Chaska, Minnesota 55318 COPIES: ❑X Owner ❑ Hallberg Engineering ❑ Anderson Johnson Ass. ❑x Heyer Engineering ❑ Dennis Hahn R Ass. ❑x Bossardt CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: ❑ City of Chanhassen Bossardt Corporation 8585 W 78th St, Ste 100 Minneapolis, MN 55438-1094 Please provide a cost breakdown in accordance with the Contract Documents and a Summary for the change described herein and on the attachments (if any) listed. This is not an authorization to proceed with the work described herein unless and until approved by the owner. On approval, this change will be included in a Supplementary Agreement, which will provide the formal Contract change. DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK: CIVIL: See Attached. Attachments: Requested By: Owner Architect Comments: Accepted By ANDERSON- JOIENSON ASSOCIATES, A mil♦ /� Me�� �/ Li nsrAPFAFrrrrrarr1WF • VrTF PU,117-\r • Cnrr. F.%rn7ymr.%. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Project: New Chanhassen High School PR #: Chaska Public Schools Subject: Southeast drive alignment - Bid To: Mike Brandt Package #2 Rozeboom Miller Architects 244 1 st Ave. North Minneapolis, MN 55401 Submit an itemized (labor and material) quotation for the proposed modifications to the Contract Documents as described herein within twenty- one (21) days of receipt. If a cost is not submitted within twenty-one (21) days, this Proposal Request can be accepted at no additional cost. Written approval is required prior to proceeding with this change. Cost Expectations: ❑ Deduct ❑ No Cost ❑ Add Based on the field adjusted location of Retaining Walls 2 and 4 and the box culvert (not located per the design), the alignment of the Southeast Entrance Drive shall be shifted as shown on the attached as follows. The Bid Package #2 Contractor shall provide: 1. Revised alignment of the Southeast Entrance Drive between walls 2, 3, and 4. Refer to drawings R2/C2.1 & R3/C2.1 for revisions to stationing in this area. 2. Revision to grades along the Southeast Entrance Drive. Refer to drawing R3/C3.1 3. Revised layout of retaining wall #3. Refer to drawing R8/C3.5 for location. Locate wall as originally shown so that the bottom face of the wall is 8' from back of curb. 4. Revise locations of guard rails, fencing and sod limits to accommodate the revised alignment of the Southeast Entrance Drive. ISSUED BY: Jonathan Duesman DATE: August 20, 2007 cc: Todd Iverson - Bossardt Corporation Jim Eickman - Bossardt Corporation ANDERSON- JOIV SONASSOCIATES, Me - VALLEYSQUARE OFFICE CENTER -SUITE 200 - 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD-MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA- (763)544-7129- (763)54"531 FAX ANDERSON-JOJINSON ASSOLZITET, INC E a« M 0 25 50 SHEET CHANHASSEN ww m 'w d 'mr" cilred PROJECT NO. R2 REVISED STATIONING HIGH SCHOOL wpm It" and ,ha, I am a duly M85 roplRlorod PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AT SOUTHEAST DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN undw the lamm of the Stall DATE 08/20107 ISDR112 Ot min aM A, Dula OBI 7 DR BY NMH ftg• No. 11279 ic)FC2.1 I I DANIEL L JOHNSON CK BY JRP ANDERSON-JOHNSONASSOCIATES, MC. - VALLEYSQUARE OFFICE CENTER -SUITE 200 - 7375 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD-M/NNEAPOLa MINNESOTA-(763)544-]129- (]63)54"53J FAX ++ �� v\ / o OUTHE,A / �/ o E NCE of a m ` DRIV f_- 1 � 1 Y 1 I I I ' II I I i ANDS..__.. �.,......,.. ASSOCIATES, we LWdYA/[MCNIfECI{/RC . f/([pyNiVML . ClY6lVfAIfiFMG R3 ' REVISED STATIONING AT SOUTHEAST DRIVE WALK 0 25 50 1 Mrwby *or" tMt this pkn waa CHANHASSEN pmpwnd M m. w andrr mr dbwat PROJECT NO. "' °A °nd that I am a duly "085 HIGH SCHOOL rapbtamd PROEESSIONALENOiNEER CHANHASSEN, MN under the IawR of the State DATE 0512007 ISO a112 of Min IMOta Ibti ON 7 DR BY NMH 140. 17279 DMIEL L JONNSON CK BY JRP ANDERSON-JOHNSONASSOCIATES, INC -VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER-SW7E 299- 7375 GOLDEN VALLEYROAD-AMMEAPOLLS, ADNNFS0TA-(763)54I-7129- (763)54"531 FAX ANDERSO950N Q CJO 100 ASTOC/A CUTESTES, N'G tu'� ic.uavrtrrtOc trrtnw.vvac . crv¢aw,p6 SHEET I henay mrHty that this plan was CHANHASSEN prepared byme or undw my direct PROJECT NO. REVISED WALL HIGH SCHOOL sup.W.J. and thot lam a duty oboes R8 #3 LAYOUT 1c)FC3.5 I CHANHASSEN, MN I ESSNAL ENGINEER registered PROFESSIONAL under the laws of the Stale DATE 08120)07 ISO #112 of Minnesota Out* 08/20/07 DR BY NMH Reg. No. 17279 DANIELL JOHNSON CK BY JRP 6­7 -cxe Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 Q Todd Neils: No. It will be strictly a scoreboard. A \ L Daniel: Okay. Scharfenberg: So Todd, d� eed an action items from us in terms of what kind of, I think g Y Y we're all in agreement. I think To d and the CAA will work with Little League and Softball will work with staff on developing a plan for getting scoreboards up. That would be great. Todd Neils: Great. I appreciate your time once again. Scharfenberg: And just so, that was T d Neils on behalf of the CAA speaking. That's alright. Todd Neils: Forgot my etiquette Scharfenberg: Thank Public Present: Name Address Jay Pomeroy Jonathan Duesman Paul Schlueter Anderson -Johnson Associates Anderson -Johnson Associates ISD #112 Hoffman: Thank you Chair Scharfenberg and members of the commission. Here's something that I really talking about a high school in Chanhassen. I never thought it would happen and here it is happening so that's great. Independent School District 112 is preparing to open the doors on this brand new facility in the fall of 2009. So you start putting that into your head and it's not going to happen, they have this summer to build it, next summer to build it and then really the last summer it will be mostly just ready to be filled with staff and then they'll come in that fall, 2009 and fill it with kids and start off their first year. It's located on Lyman Boulevard. Still a lot of people aren't familiar with the piece of property and so when you talk to folks, it's somewhat hard to describe but as they see here... understanding where it's at exactly. It's 94 acres. It was purchased by the District in 2004. Just over $9 million dollars and in fact at that time I think $97,000 per acre ... back at that time it was probably the top of the heap as far as the land acreage, cost per acre but today looks like a relative bargain and you continue to see that trend in Chanhassen, although the market has soften a little bit in the last 18 months or so. The property has Lyman Boulevard on the south and west. The Twin Cities and Northern Railroad on the north side and then city parkland bounds this entire property on the east side. There's a gas pipeline on the property and that presents a significant obstacle for developing this site. If you look at the site plan, the school is definitely maximize the available space and is constructing significant athletic and recreational facilities on the property. Retaining walls are also a common theme throughout the site, and again that's due to the pipeline and then the grades on the property and then the need to maximize the space that is available there for the school and it's use. Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 There's a trail that's an important connection on the, it'd be the northeast corner. The railroad, we have a very interesting double box culvert located at that location. At one time the Renaissance Festival was located north for 2 years at the property and the parking was out here in these corn fields south and then they would take the visitors to the Renaissance through that double box culvert on hay wagons to the Renaissance for the first 2 years. The party got too rowdy and Chanhassenites ... leave town so I'm not sure if was good wisdom or not but they chased the Renaissance Festival out of Chanhassen and it headed down to Shakopee so that's a little bit of history. Again that trail is currently used and is part of the very extensively is part of the Bluff Creek trail system throughout our community which when it's completed will be the longest and most uninterrupted trail system throughout the city. With the underpasses at all the major intersections. Lyman Boulevard will be upgraded as a part of this project. It would have to be done, constructed into a 4 lane. There'll be another underpass at the south end of this property to facilitate that trail and this underpass. So pedestrian movement will be safe ... Tonight we have a variety of representatives and I'll allow themselves to introduce themselves from the school district and the other professional service providers that they're working with. And this is an opportunity, they'll be coming before the Planning Commission and the City Council as they move through the site plan process. At the Park and Recreation Commission level, there's not a standard subdivision application. In fact I don't even think we're subdividing the property are we? Audience: No. Hoffman: No. ...so it's an opportunity to educate the commission so as you work in the community and people are talking about the high school and which way ... they will continue, is that you can give them first hand information from the people that are bringing it to the community. That will be operating and building the school so I'll allow them to make some presentations and comments and then you can engage in a conversation with them and learn some more about the school. Steve Pumper: Thanks commissioners, good evening. Scharfenberg: Good evening. Steve Pumper: I'm Steve Pumper. Pm the Director of Finance and Operations for the school district and kind of their point person on the Chanhassen High School. With me tonight I have Paul Schlueter who's our supervisor of the buildings and grounds and he kind of works with all the construction that we have for the district, and then 2 of our vast members of the project team that we have Jay Pomeroy and Jonathan Duesman. They both work for Anderson -Johnson Associates who are our civil engineers on this project and they are primarily responsible for the development of the site plan, etc and will be our experts in developing the fields that you're probably most interested in talking about tonight. I'll let them come and talk about what we have on the site, etc. I want to reinforce what Todd said is that this was a challenging site. It's a beautiful site. It's going to be a beautiful school. It's going to be the venue to watch games here, it's going to be great because of the topography, etc, but there are a lot of challenges with it. The wetlands presented a challenge. The pipeline presented a challenge. And then just the topography, the site presented a challenge so it's going to be beautiful, it'll be wonderful, but E Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 actually I don't want to take Jay's thunder away. I think it's probably the most challenging site that he's had to work with, and they've done an excellent job. We're really happy. We've worked with them before. They've maximized the number of fields that we can put on the site, so we really believe we have the same number of facilities that we currently have at Chaska High School, so the only thing I want to say on behalf of the school district is, while we have the same number of fields, Chaska High School doesn't have enough fields to service the high school programs it has right now. We use our middle school campus. We use fields around the city of Chaska and Chanhassen right now so we certainly will be looking for that cooperation, and we've had that dialogue already with Todd and Todd actually about future endeavors with the City of Chanhassen because this site will not lend itself to enough fields to take care of our 2000 student high school campus. With that III let either Jonathan or Jay come up and kind of walk through the site. Kind of show you what we have there and then certainly engage in dialogue with you. Jay Pomeroy: I'll just kind of give you a brief rundown on the general site and sort of the program elements involved with this and some of the features associated with the site and some of the challenges associated as well. I think you know in the packets that you were provided it kind of talks about the size in general and Todd did a good job mentioning sort of that, what are the boundaries to the site and what's coming through the site. First and foremost, you know we'll obviously be situating here in the middle is the school itself. Across the site there's about 90 feet of real grade change. It sits on a bluff. The high point right here in the middle and that's where we've located the school itself. With that you know getting access to the school we've got 3 points of egress/ingress to the site. The first being down here off of Lyman and Audubon. Strictly that's more seen as for bus traffic than onto the site. Providing a road in and to the east side of the school here for about 30 buses and turn around over there. The two primary points of entrance to the school site for vehicle traffic would then be off Lyman, making a access point out here by aligning with Lake Hazeltine Drive and the second one up here a little bit just south of the railroad. What we've got parking counts right now we're looking at about, spots for about 1,000 cars parked around the site. And obviously you see here on the plans to the north and to the west of the school site, the school building itself. So that would be the vehicular traffic patterns into the school site itself. To the north of the gas line is where the majority of the sporting venues are going to be located. Right here, basically in the middle would be where the football stadium would be located. Access to that would be right through the middle of the site across the gas line. The gas line, there's some limitations as to what we're allowed to do for grading options there. There's some fill that were allowed to do on top of the actual gas line. Gas easement itself. 100 foot easement, but they're limiting too. We really can't do any cutting if we wanted to. That's kind of what is making us put in so many retaining walls adjacent to the gas easement itself. But pedestrian traffic would come from the parking lot here in the north and greet, before you get to the stadium itself there'd be a central plaza area where concession building, ticket booth would be located there. But then down here, kind of sunk down into a hill we have the football stadium and 9 lane running tracks. There would be, the retaining wall that would wrap around, not quite 2/3 of it itself. The highest point would be along this edge here where the home side is, and you're looking at about 6 foot high retaining wall there. But the seating itself would be set up on a hillside. This area to the south and east would be along, about a 3 to 1 slope down there so it'd be kind of a nice vantage point for watching games at night. Just to the west of the stadium itself there would be the baseball and softball fields. Both fields are 51 Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 going to be ag lime infields associated with them. Perimeter fencing would be around them as well. We're looking at having a scoreboard for actually the softball field, the baseball field and stadium field itself, so providing 3 scoreboards. Seating and everything for the baseball fields. We've got some grade change here that's going to benefit us for providing some, I guess I'll call it some unique seating in the sense that, you know by tying both the softball and baseball fields, there'll be a concrete pad for bleachers. But however we got a little bit of grade change between the plaza and the baseball field where you know it might provide a kind of nice little vantage point for, you'd actually be a little bit above in the plaza from the baseball field elevation so you can ... but then along the gas easement itself were going to have this here, there's some retaining walls. We've really worked through the grading a lot in 2 months time. I mean it's kind of a revolving thing. We're also one day you know something comes to light and we're like oh wow, you know it changes this. Let's do that. We've really eliminated a lot of the walls that are going up in this area itself. We're still going to have walls along the, or a wall here at the edge of the outfield for the baseball and a small wall here for the back part of the center field for the softball field. But we're looking at doing, just bringing in a little seat wall here that would be along the first base line for the baseball field and a little bit higher wall there, so we're giving kind of a lot of open bend places for people to view the games themselves. Walking then, take you down sort of past the stadium itself. We're going to have the 12 foot wide bituminous path that would lead down from the concession building, wrapping around the stadium providing the visitors access down to their seating area down here. A retaining wall would wrap on half of that path itself because you've got grade change coming down this path to the discus and shot put area. Really worked a lot and tried to get the relationship between the field and this wetland and everything to kind of sit in there and not be a really tall, intrusive vertical wall. So we kind of stacked some, the field events in here to try to minimize the overall impact to the site. Tried to mess with some of the events in the area. But you would come down the path here and you've got the shot put and the discus areas down there. There's going to be a significant wall along this edge here between the field events and the wetlands just to the east. What were at right now looking at is doing a double tiered wall. The concern we've had is, you know shot put, throwing the discus, if you're standing right there, we're looking at probably about the highest spot. About 28 foot high wall. It's going to taper off so the highest point we're looking at is about 28 feet, so the concern we had is if you're standing there, you've got a fence here and you're looking on 28 feet, so we worked to break this wall up. Pretty much from this point here all the way along over to this corner off the edge of the discus. Tiering it down to a 3 foot wall. You've got your fence and you've got a 3 foot wall dropped down to the next planter area there to kind of help break that up. Soften the edge so it's not such a vertical impact along the fence, and then the greater part of the wall would then be offset from there. Just back, back up just on the other side of the easement as you can see there's two 4 court complexes for tennis over there adjacent to the buildings themselves. Again with the amount of grade change in the site, we're high here. The west side of the school and this parking lot. Terracing down at about 3 to 1 slope along the grass here to the first series of tennis courts right here. There would be an access path along just the west side of that, but then from there begin terracing down at about another 3 to 1 slope to get down to this lower complex of tennis courts. Access for there being provided through the stairs. For one of the things that's been requested 0 along is for the football players and this kind of ties in with site access, pedestrian access to the site, would be how do you get the football players here at halftime back to the school. Right now the design is that there is access back here. We are able to provide a path across the easement itself. We were able to raise grade across there which 7 Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 helped dramatically, or at one point we had a very extensive series of walls over here. And interviewing and sort of having conversations with the gas line, we had to raise the grade, therefore provide a path. It is not going to be a handicap access path. The site just doesn't allow it unfortunately. The most we'll have is about a 9% slope right in this part of the path itself but then it does flatten out in this area right here. The walk right here is handicap accessible. Going into the northeast comer of the site where the remaining field event areas are going to be located is, we've got 2 practice softball fields down here and a practice, or regulation sized soccer field but then sort of a small practice, 180 foot by 180 foot soccer field. We tried originally to try to get a full scale, or full sized soccer field in there. However we were limited in the fact that we've got a 20 foot setback requirement from the actual wetland boundary, and by the time we factored that in and the grade change, we weren't able to get a full sized field in there. And then as you can see here, as Todd had alluded to, is just sort of this connection with the path over to this existing path and the below grade crossing underneath the rail line over there. I did forget to mention too that there will be 2 additional practice soccer fields just on the south side of the gas line itself. Tucked between Lyman and the parking lot there, those will be full sized practice fields there. I probably left a few things, I went on the fast side. I don't know if you were able to keep up with some of that ... talk a little fast but, I think that's pretty much kind of the general framework. I'll certainly answer any questions anybody might have. Daniel: I have a few questions. What type of turf is the stadium field going to be? Jay Pomeroy: Well the option right now is I think we're looking at two. I mean grass versus artificial. Daniel: Is there one way, is there a particular way that the district would like to see? Steve Pumper: We certainly want artificial surface. It's...to contain grass. We're also putting in at least 3 alternates and once those bids come in, we'll see. We're also, we're taking bids on the football field and the 2 soccer practices, so we'd like to see all 3 of them artificial. Daniel: Is the site going to be prepped at all for possible future expansion with a dome, much like Minnetonka has? Steve Pumper: No. Scharfenberg: Jack, any questions? Spizale: Concerning this gas line, would that be like covered with grass then? Jay Pomeroy: The overall plan, yeah. You've got to create... and plan for the entire site. And we have, the strong element of the wetlands to the east is kind of a big impact to the site so we're looking at creating a lot of native and prairie grasses around the entire site itself so just sodding what we need to sod but then a lot of these perimeter areas that don't need to be maintained is providing a lot of prairie grasses. Especially along this gas easement. It's not a maintainable really area... Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 Spizale: ...doing any over grading or take dirt away from that spot as far as using it? Jay Pomeroy: Yeah. I mean the limitations are, they basically said we can fill a certain amount over the actual gas pipe itself and then sort of the periphery of it but as far as cutting in, they maintain a, or they have a standard of, the amount of fill that needs to over the top of it and pretty much where it's at and we just can't do any cutting is about the only option we have to help this filling. Originally our intent was to just not touch the actual gas easement itself, but in the realization, and in talking through with the gas company what we can do, that really, filling this portion down here was a huge benefit to the site in the fact that it really minimized the amount of retaining walls that go, that was going on around the tennis courts and stuff, and even in this portion and the back side of the discus itself so, that was kind of I think a real huge savings to us. We really minimized the amount of retaining walls over that. Spizale: How deep is the gas line? Jay Pomeroy: 2 1/2 feet I believe covered. Hoffman: What's the diameter? Jay Pomeroy: How deep is it? Jonathan Duesman: It's between 3, 2 1/2 and 3 1/2. We actually ... the gas main and it's. Hoffman: Is it 9 inch, 10 inch culvert? Jonathan Duesman: It's a 10 inch steel high pressure for gasoline. Hoffman: But approximately how much cover are you going to be able to add there? 10 feet? 6 feet? Jay Pomeroy: No. I think it's 6 foot max. Jonathan Duesman: 8. Jay Pomeroy: 8 foot max over the pipe itself. Spizale: Okay. That's all I got. Scharfenberg: Tom. Kelly: What kind of surface is a running track going to be? I mean more a hard surface or more of a soft, rubbery surface around the running track? Jonathan Duesman: It's a soft, it's a resilient half inch thick. It's called polyurethane. Much like Chaska's track, although it's a newer generation... W Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 Kelly: Are basketball hoops common in high schools? Outdoor basketball hoops. And so is there a plan to have any at this high school? Jay Pomeroy: It did not come... Kelly: Okay. I mean what size are the basketball courts in size? Do you have a concern that it's close to what Eden Prairie has in terms of the number of basketball courts? Jonathan Duesman: 6 basketball courts inside. 6 full regulation basketball courts... Steve Pumper: It's exactly the same as the other Chaska High. Kelly: Okay. Spizale: I guess I got one other question too. In the parking, is that the normal amount of parking for a high school? You say that you have like a Chaska or something, is that. Steve Pumper: 1,003 at Chaska High right now so. I think Johnson's saying we have 1,000 spaces within those 3 lots I think and then also where the bus slot goes around. If you're doing Pioneer Ridge, the school, you know the bus lot goes there. That's used as parking as well. The same we'd have in here, so you could certainly park in the bus parking... Spizale: So parking is adequate? Not too small, not too big? Steve Pumper: Right. The only time we have an issue with parking at Chaska High now is, you know the Eden Prairie football game is an issue. When we used to have graduation there it was an issue but that's pretty much it. Daniel: In case of a rivalry between Chaska and Chanhassen at this point now, what type of concerns in terms of overflow? Are there any contingency plans in that or are you on your own? Because knowing the site, there's not a whole lot of parking options with the exception of Hazeltine Business District across there I assume. Jay Pomeroy: And actually that's a, I haven't, I don't have ... but that almost lends itself better than you know Chaska, well certainly for cars... Pioneer Trail so it'd be the same here on Lyman. I'm not sure that's ideal either. It's not like we're... Hazeltine actually helps provide ... It happens so infrequently right now, I don't know. And especially when Chanhassen opens, our goal is, we're expecting to be at roughly 75% capacity for students so, the number of people at first, but who knows what it's going to look like at a football game. I don't know. Well find out but I think it's something we can... Spizale: I've got another question too. The land to the I would imagine it would be to the south where the electrical thing is. Jay Pomeroy: Yes. 10 Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 Spizale: Is any more of that useable in the future or is that just, is that strictly for the electrical? Jay Pomeroy: We've already worked that out with the City of Chaska. We're getting easements so the road can go over part of that property but it's not, there's not much land there anyways but it's not developable for anything else. Spizale: Okay. Scharfenberg: Steve, what fields are going to be lighted at the new facility? Just the football field? Steve Pumper: Just the football field, yes. Scharfenberg: Okay. So tennis courts, none of that other stuff. At least is there plans for lighting that in the future? Steve Pumper: No, there's not. We're not, what do you call it, roughing it in for anything in the future. Not to say it couldn't happen, but we're not planning anything. Daniel: As well as it looks like the baseball field then, there's going to be. Steve Pumper: No plans for that. Daniel: Is there going to be a concern about, I mean I remember playing at Chaska when your games even though they start at 4:30, this time of the year, it starts to get dark pretty quick. Any idea as far as how that might be addressed or just try to get them in quickly? Steve Pumper: Yeah, there's a lot of fields that don't have lights you know in the conference that, which we've played in so. Daniel: Okay. Scharfenberg: Steve, what are the, we talked about the need for additional space within the city of Chanhassen, because obviously this site doesn't address all of the needs of the school district. What other needs does the school district have? Now I see, you know soccer fields, fall sports with soccer and football, where's the football team going to practice in addition to soccer and what are the other needs that the district has besides just on this site? Steve Pumper: Yeah. Let's not talk about hockey yet because... but when we, it's a little bit of a wild card. If we are able to afford to obtain the artificial surface, a lot of our needs will be mitigated because not only will football probably be using the stadium field but soccer will also. You know the good thing is we have fields throughout our district as well, and while this is Chanhassen High School it doesn't mean that we still won't be using fields all over and so our currently there's a soccer facility at the middle school east and west and the campuses there can handle more varsity games so, and that's a lit field as well so we can put them there. But for, as far as practice goes, well probably need some more practice space for soccer. One of our 11 Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 biggest needs I think will be more practice needs for baseball and softball. Baseball more than softball but we're short on those. Although again talking with Todd, that actually where you probably have most of your available space right now. I mean there s certainly some fields that we can use there. One of the things, and I don't know where this is at either but we talked about the lighting for the baseball field. If it ever comes to fruition that Chanhassen develops a, you know more of a sports town type baseball field that you know was talked about, that's certainly something that the district would certainly be willing to talk about having it's varsity team play there. This is going to be a varsity sized field and our plans right now is to play varsity games there, but it certainly, you know it wouldn't preclude us from participating in a more of a stadium complex for baseball as well. But until that happens were going to need some practice spaces for those, so I think our two biggest ones are going to be soccer/Lacrosse and baseball. Daniel: Is there any interest at all, I know you, and obviously Steve you've had these discussions with Todd it looks like. We have gone down the path of looking at a facility similar to, not exactly like the athletic field, athletic park in Chaska in this town. In Lake Susan in particular. Where you could possibly take a look at the cost of what it would, of what incurred for building this particular site and possibly partnering with the City of Chanhassen to move that type of facility along quicker? Because really from our perspective it will be dependent upon either capital funding, or a voter referendum and if there's X amount of dollars into that particular site preparation which fencing, dugouts, outside of just trying to do a soccer field, that we could possibly partner and use that funding if the district is interested in doing that, or having those discussions. Steve Pumper: Yeah we, well let me just say we're always interested for sure... discussion. I don't want to mislead you though. This baseball field, and Jay can correct me if I'm wrong but by no means... state of the art basically. Dugout's pretty minimal. It's not a high level. I mean other than the field itself, which will be fine, and we're going to want that field I think no matter what happens, whether it's for JV or not. But it still doesn't mean that we wouldn't be interested in contributing practical dollars to build up you know a bigger complex. I can't promise that but you know certainly we'd be willing to have a dialogue. In fact I'd be willing to have dialogue with Chanhassen if you really wanted to have artificial turf on the stadium... That would help both of us the most. If we could have artificial turf on this field, it would help both the city programs and the district programs by far. Scharfenberg: Steve, what is the cost of just grass versus, now when you're talking turf right, I know some schools buy used turf but this would be brand new. Is it kind of the stuff with the ground up rubber? Steve Pumper: Yep. Scharfenberg: Type of Astroturf. Jay Pomeroy: Field turf. Scharfenberg: Field turf? What is the cost? 12 Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 Jay Pomeroy: The stadium field, just so we make sure we're on track. The stadium field is going to be a sand based field. It's going to be a little harder performance field so it does rebound fast. To make the upcharge or the upgrade to a synthetic turf is about a half million dollars. The softer fields are going to be built with the existing clay soils that are out there now. To bump those up to artificial is probably about $650,000 or $700,000 per field. Give or take. So were looking at over a million and a half if you want to get all 3 fields done. Again, our first priority would be the stadium, which is you know half a million dollars. Scharfenberg: Jonathan could you, I had one question about the trail. Can you kind of show us where the trail is on this site and then are there any issues with respect to the grading and that regarding the trail? Jonathan Duesman: Right now, sure. Again the connection point is going to be right up here, as stated in the existing... Grading lines, there are no real constraints. Everything is through here that we've got graded is going to be handicap accessible. We're maxing out at 5% up in through here and up and around. For after hours though access to the site will probably, this can be closed off the way it's looking so you know the access from a pedestrian would be you come across here and just work their way down along here, adjacent to the school and then run along this fire lane that's on the east side of the school itself. And then from there, we do have this path out connecting down here by Audubon so there'd be this north/south connection there. Lyman itself you know originally I think when we were looking at a path adjacent to both drives coming in. Right now the design discussion, we're focusing on one just central connection point coming off of Lyman. Aligning itself with a walk that runs inbetween the parent drop off here and the parking lot that is just to the south right there. So we can have a walk that goes along Lyman and then we'd have an access coming off of that, directly leading right to the front entry of the school itself. Daniel: It looks like off of our main path, kind of a loop towards the top right hand corner. Yeah, right there. Is there a connection point at that right there? I just want sure I read that correctly. Two drops down. Yeah, this is right towards the 20 is the reference point on the city path. Hoffman: I think you're looking at the creek. Daniel: Oh! Gotch ya. Jay Pomeroy: Yeah, that's Bluff Creek. Daniel: Okay, so that's for the runoff. That's not an actual path that connects up, okay. Okay, I see where the path connects now. Hoffman: Especially the new design or the re -meandered creek, that's a whole other topic but the MnDot is in there doing a wetland restoration project as a part of their work on Highway 212/312 so, that's some of the work you see but that design there is the new design of the creek. It's being taken out of this channel and re -meandered back to it's old form. 13 Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 Daniel: Okay. Kelly: Is there room for a pool, if that comes to fruition in the future or not at the school? Jay Pomeroy: No. Kelly: No? Okay. Hoffman: And you said he wasn't ready to talk pool either. Daniel: What is the actual, from the point of the stadium to the north parking lot, what's the elevation drop? Jay Pomeroy: We're at a 922 elevation here and at this corner of the parking lot I believe it's about a 952. So pretty much 30 feet. Daniel: And you said there's going to be along the, is that the southeast corner here, a retaining wall along the track, correct? Jay Pomeroy: Correct. Basically it's going to start here. Kind of gradually increase in height. The maximum height that would be adjacent to the track itself would be 6 feet when we get over about here. Just off of the south side and then we just start tapering back down... Daniel: Okay. And it's going to be grass to help along? Kind of like a stadium type of approach. No pun attended but alright. Scharfenberg: Seating capacity for the stadium? Jay Pomeroy: We're matching Chaska High School so it's 1,500, give or take on the home side. About 800 on the visitor side with, we've already counted for perhaps some expansion on the home side to 2,000. Hoffman: When you say matching, that's the, not the temporary bleacher there? Matching the permanent bleachers there? Jay Pomeroy: You can reinforce ... a really neat piece of the stadium is that it's a top loaded football stadium so you're kind of going into a bowl which is going to be really neat. Hoffman: Jonathan can you, I understand in talking with Paul Schlueter that there are two different kinds of walls and materials. Can you describe the two different materials and then point out some of the locations for those walls. Jonathan Duesman: Sure. What we're looking at right now is what's called a big block... standard block. Standard block I think most people are probably familiar with Keystone, the anchor type block with the smaller 8 inch height. The big block is really what it is. I mean these things are about 41 inches in depth. About 2 feet high. 4 feet wide roughly. 14 Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 Hoffman: The Home Depot walls down in Chaska? Jonathan Duesman: Yeah, that's what I was going to say. Chaska Target. Originally we were really looking, we were kind of keying on some of the big blocks around the site. We just thought it probably provided, with the taller walls that we've got, that was a concern of our's, and also just kind of a uniformity throughout the site. We were kind of really at the start of things looking for the big block. Now we're seeing a lot so, the one we're looking at right now is kind of an 80-20 split. 80% of the walls would be the standard block and then the 20 would be the big block. I think what we're focusing on right now as far as the big block goes would be down the bus drive itself. There's an existing, this large wetland just to the east that we're preserving. As it works it's way right now, existing, it comes through the site just south of the school here and wraps up into this parking area ... but we are preserving this portion of the wetland here. And we're going to basically have to bridge the wetland itself with a culvert situation. So we kind of focused our efforts on really using the big block on these walls back in here and then everywhere else would just be the standard block. Daniel: Todd what are we going to be able, from our perspective, at least the City of Chan, how are we, will this be part of our park system that we're going to include in our brochure with all the amenities? Similar to what we do with Chanhassen, we list the city. Hoffman: We haven't. Daniel: Or are we going to go down that path? Hoffman: Well first impression is probably not. But we haven't had those explicit discussions yet to that level of detail. This is a site, much different than a Chanhassen Elementary or Bluff Creek Elementary. Again at those locations the community has the majority of the access to the site because you don't have after school sporting activities taking place. You have children on the playground during the day and then somebody needs to manage this park at night and so you know we mow it, we maintain it. We schedule it and then we get the community out there at night. That works great. This location is not going to be a whole lot of opportunity to put the community out there in the evening, other than perhaps they'll have access to tennis, right? Steve Pumper: I would think so. Hoffman: Yeah. They'll be able to use that so, I don't think we'll be doing a lot of maintenance from the city level and I don't think we'll be doing scheduling and a lot of public access to this site. Spizale: Todd, I've got a question for you. Where, respective of that is the culvert that goes underneath the railroad tracks. Hoffman: Jonathan can point it out to you. Spizale: Is it right where that trail is? So now that trail will likely Y? 15 Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 Hoffman: Y, yep. Spizale: So actually the kids that live in the neighborhood behind, Stone Creek, can walk to the school. I didn't quite catch that. I thought the culvert was farther down. That's great. Hoffman: They'll walk to school. Some of the kids ... they'll be able to walk right up there. Spizale: Yeah, it's a great path. So that's when they're talking about developing right over here then. So that would Y right after, right at that point? Hoffman: Right as you come out of the tunnel you'll take a right and go right up into the school site. Spizale: Boy that's great. Steve Pumper: It did come up, just interesting at the open house we had for the neighborhood, that especially after it rains, that it's a bad spot that culvert. Like a wash out comes there and the path actually, I don't know if it's dirt and rock that gets, crosses over that so if you're biking it's a dangerous spot. Hoffman: That was previous to the improvement project. It's been improved, upgraded. The culvert's been replaced and that's... Scharfenberg: But it still does happen though occasionally. Hoffman: Does it? Scharfenberg: Yeah, with some heavy rains you still get some. Hoffman: Not like it was before. Scharfenberg: No. No. Hoffman: Yeah, that September rain we had, Powers Boulevard was closed. Scharfenberg: Any other questions? Daniel: I just have one more. Jerry, I don't know if this will be for you as well. Recreation. Other events. Basketball. Things that Chaska High School has right now with their after hours, what will be some of the programs that they have. Are we going to be partnering? Or do we need to go to Bluff Creek or are we going to look at the high school as well? Ruegemer: As far as. Daniel: Some of the basketball leagues. 16 Park and Rec Commission - February 27, 2007 Ruegemer: ...facilities, that sort of thing. Daniel: Yeah. Ruegemer: That certainly is an opportunity for the future to expand existing programs that we have. Certainly we need to go through the allocation process with the school district but it certainly is a possibility for the future. Hoffman: Jackie at Jonathan is the Director of Community Ed. From what I understand, they schedule it. Right? Community Ed schedules it after hours for the most part? Steve Pumper: Yes. Hoffman: So we'll be talking with them but it's just like, we'll have access to it but they take it first and then the community has a stab at it and then after that... We want to be as a community inside and outside of the building. The theater's going to be there. There's plenty of things that are coming to town. That's one reason you know why we're so excited is that the community of Chanhassen will have great access to these facilities, not just during school days for children's activities, but in the evening for the general public to have activities as well. Spizale: Yeah, I think you guys did a great job of lining it up. You know having that wetlands to one side of it's going to be really neat. It's going to be a great view from there I would think. Jay Pomeroy: It's going to be a beautiful site. Spizale: Yeah. Yeah it is. Hoffman: Biology class will be happy. Spizale: Is there any plans to include some education with the wetlands? Steve Pumper: Oh no question. ...as a matter of fact an interesting side note is, you know certainly we're going to have 100 acres with only maybe 10 acres of wetlands —but there's some schools that buy a 100 acre site and there's nothing on it and they actually put wetlands in specifically for their science programs so that's one good thing that we can take. Scharfenberg: Given the changes in elevation with some of the ballfields and that, is there concerns about drainage and that around those sites? Jay Pomeroy: I don't think so. I think we've got it actually designed. To be honest with you... grade change out there, we use it to our advantage so... Daniel: Excellent. Absolutely gorgeous. It's a great site. Scharfenberg: Thank you all for coming tonight. We appreciate it. 17 Jr p-) --c co 1% MEMORANDUM CITY OF CIMNSEN TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Kate Aanenson AICP. Community Development Director PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: June 18, 2008 oj.J Administration � Phone:952.227.1100 SUBJ: High School Retaining Wall Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952227.1180 Attached please find a letter from Steve Pumper from School District 112 Fax:952.227.1190 regarding the large retaining wall along the bus entrance to the new high school. Engineering When this project was approved, the Council required that, "the applicant and Phone: 952.227.1160 city staff look at reasonable alternative designs to reduce the impact of the Fax:952.227.1170 retaining walls." Finance Phone: 952.227,1140 The School District received a quote for a two-tier structure; however, the cost Fax :9522271110 difference between a one -tier and two-tier wall is $123,400. The School District Parr & Recreation is therefore requesting that they be allowed to proceed with the one -tier wall Phone. 952 227.1120 design. Fax: 952,227.1110 Recreation Center If there are no objections from the City Council, staff will issue the one -tier wall 2310 Coulter Boulevard permit based on the demonstrated cost increase and their intent to "break up" the Phone: 952,227.1400 Faz:952.221.1404 expanse of the wall with trees, vegetation, and vines. P g Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us OCAWMM G:\PLAN\2007 Planning Cases\07-06 Chanhassen lbgh School\retaining wall.dm The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Office of Administration District Education Center 11 Peavey Road School Chaska, Minnesota 55318 District (952) 556-6100 ...Preparingalllearners June 13, 2007 to achieve their personal best Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 M JUN 1 4 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN This letter is a follow up to our phone conversation regarding one of the retaining walls on the Chanhassen High School site. Per discussion by the Chanhassen City Council during the permitting process, the Council preferred the School District look at the possibility of reducing the perceived height of a retaining wall adjacent to the entry road that leads out to Audubon. It was suggested that the wall be made into a two-tier structure. The District agreed to try to change the design, given both the limited amount of available land since it is extremely close to the wet- land buffer zone, and the probability of added expense. It was my understanding that night that while the Council wished for change to occur, it was also communicated that it needed to stay within reasonable redesign and cost limits. It appears that we are able redesign the wall in such a fashion that can stay within the available land restrictions. However, after receiving the attached Proposal Request from Rosti Construction, the contractor awarded the retaining wall contract, it appears to be cost prohibitive to make this change. Rosti Construction indicates it would add $123,400 to its contract to change the wall to a two-tier style. The District does not believe this cost justifies the added aesthetic benefit that would be gained by making this change. Per discussions we have had in the past, we will continue to "break up" the expanse of our retaining walls with trees, vegetation, and vines. We hope this will be an acceptable solution. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 952-556-6261. Sincerely, Steve Pumper Cc Kate Aanenson Bob Generours Serving the communities of Carver, Chanhassen, Chaska, and Victoria through equal opportunity in employment and education. ROSTI CONSTRUCTION CO OF MN, INC. P. O. Box 243 Lakeville, MN 55044 Fax: May 25, 2007 To: Todd Iverson Bossardt Corporation From: Jeff Smith Project: New Chanhassen High School Subject: Retaining Wall Revisions -walls 92 & #5 Below please fuid a cost breakdown for the requested changes: 1. Revision for wall #5: 952-461-4376 952-461-4377 • Deduct $40,080 • Cost breakdown is the following (per SF): Block $4 Georgrid $2 Aggregate $1 Labor $3 Equipment $2 for total of $12 per SF. 2. Revision for wall 42. • Add 3,300 SF Qa $38 for a total of $123,40C Wall is to be two-tier style as shown. • Cost breakdown is the following (per SF): Block $14 Georgrid $6 Aggregate $5 Labor $6 Equipment $3 for total of $34 per SF. 39, 60 It% • $�, 3y0;� RECEIVED 9/9 'd 009r TIME MAV.25. 8:44AM ON d800 APSS09 Wdll:l LOOT '! 'u nf ►] \ MEMORANDUM CITYOF TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner CI NNSEN 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director , PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: March 1, 2007 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 SUBJ: Park & Recreation Commission Site Plan Review — Chanhassen Fax:952,227.1110 High School Campus Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax:952227.1190 On Tuesday, February 27, the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the site plan for the new Chanhassen High School. Representatives attending from Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 School District 112 included Steve Pumper, Director of Operations and Finance; Fax:952.227.1170 Paul Schuleter, Director of Buildings and Grounds; and Jay Pomeroy and Jonathan Duesman both of Anderson -Johnson Associates. Mr. Duesman gave a Finance Phane:952.227.1140 presentation to the Commission explaining the planning efforts that focused on P P g P g e Fax:952.227.1110 the exterior of the building. The remaining representatives also provided input into the conversation and answered questions from the commission. The Park .Recreation Phone: following areas were identified for additional study. y Fax: 952227.1110 Recreation Center NEED TO MAXIMIZE PARKING CAPACITY ON THE SITE 2310 Counter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 With the only obvious overflow parking option being the shoulders of Lyman Fax:952.227.1404 Boulevard, the Park and Recreation Commission believes it is important to Planning s maximize parking on the property. When hosting very large events or multiple Natural Resources events at the school, visitors will be forced to seek out overflow parking. Phone: 52227.1110 Fax:952.227.1,10 Potential overflow parking areas, beyond what is planned in the bus corral, P g include the shoulder areas of Lyman Boulevard, shoulder areas of the interior Public Works access roads, the shoulder areas of Lake Hazeltine Drive in Chaska, the private 1Park Road Phone:ne: 952.227.1300 parking lots in the Lake Hazeltine Industrial Park, and the residential streets in Fax:952.227.1310 the Stone Creek neighborhood. Most of these potential off -site overflow parking options are unsafe, the others are undesirable. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax.952.227,1110 TRAIIS/PEDESTRIAN FLOW Web Site The school site is a sizable property featuring many destinations. Much of the www.ci chanhassen.mn.us movement throughout the site will be pedestrian -oriented. The school property will be accessed on nights and weekends by walkers and runners that will utilize the pedestrian accommodations on the site as part of their recreation route. Planning for predictable travel patterns and providing barrier -free trail and sidewalk access is critical. Areas of concern, based upon the submitted site plan, include the northeast quadrant of the building and access routes from the SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play r • Chanhassen High School Site Plan Review +� March 1, 2007 Page 2 north parking lot to the tennis courts and railroad trail underpass. At present, a Pedestrian route around the northeast comer of the buildings is not shown. A stairway adjacent to the north wail of the gymnasiums should be added to correct this deficiency. This would create an access from the north parking lot to the tennis court area. In addition, it is unclear if pedestrians moving between the north parking lot and the railroad trail underpass will have unobstructed access due to perimeter fencing and associated gates around the stadium area. ATHLETIC FIELD CAPACITY The site plan includes a variety of athletic fields and other sports -related amenities. However, the athletic fields provided on the property will likely not accommodate all the needs that will be generated by school sporting events. The School District will look to other district facilities and community -based facilities to fill the gap between demand and supply. At present, the City has very limited excess capacity at our athletic field facilities. Under a scenario in which the city would move to accommodate school district sporting events, existing community user groups would be displaced. This is not a desirable scenario from all perspectives. RECOMMENDATIONS An additional 48 parking stalls have been identified as an alternate finishing plan for the south parking lot. It is recommended that these stalls be included in the base bid package. As a potential measure to dramatically increase on -site athletic field capacity, an add/altemate bid item to install artificial turf in lieu of grass on the stadium field and two soccer fields has been proposed. Again, it is recommended that these alternates be included in the base bid package. In regard to trails and pedestrian flow, it is recommended that the described stairway be added on the north exterior wall of the gymnasium and sufficient accommodations be made for uninterrupted pedestrian access from the north parking lot to the railroad trail underpass. c. District 112 Schools Anderson -Johnson Associates Park and Recreation Commission Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Laurie Hokkanen, Assistant City Manager Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07-06 March 6, 2007 Page 29 structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) shall be provided for the ponds; details should be provided. j. Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering methods from the City's project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior to conducting any and all dewatering on -site. k. Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets. 1. The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A). in. The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area. n. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. o. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (i.e., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. 11. Park Director Conditions: a. The developer shall install a stairway along the north exterior wall of the gymnasium or a trail connection from the southeast corner of the north parking lot to the trail adjacent to the tennis courts. b. The developer is encouraged to include the additional 48 parking stalls, identified as an alternate finishing plan for the south parking lot, in the base bid package. c. The developer is encouraged to include artificial turf in lieu of grass on the stadium field and two soccer fields in the base bid package." D. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on the site of the Chanhassen High School, plans prepared by Pinnacle Engineering, dated February 9, 2007, subject to the following conditions: A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. All wetlands and wetland buffer areas shall be protected by silt fence during grading. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans. 0 MEMORANDUM CITYOF TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner CgANgASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park &Recreation Director ; PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN55317 DATE: March 1,2007 Administration Phone: s 9 Phone: 52227.1 SUBJ: Park & Recreation Commission Site Plan Review — Chanhassen Fax: 952227.1110 High School Campus Building Inspections Phone: 952.227,1180 Fax :952.227.1190 On Tuesday, February 27, the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the site plan for the new Chanhassen High School. Representatives attending from Engineering Phane:952.227.1180 School District 112 included Steve Pumper, Director of Operations and Finance; Fax: 952.2271170 Paul Schuleter, Director of Buildings and Grounds; and Jay Pomeroy and Jonathan Duesman both of Anderson -Johnson Associates. Mr. Duesman gave a Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 presentation to the Commission explaining the planning efforts that focused on Fax.952.227.1110 the exterior of the building. The remaining representatives also provided input into the conversation and answered questions from the commission. The Park Recreation Phone::952.221.1120 following areas were identified for additional study. Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center NEED TO MAXIMIZE PARKING CAPACITY ON THE SITE 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 With the only obvious overflow parking option being the shoulders of Lyman Fax: 952 227 1404 Boulevard, the Park and Recreation Commission believes it is important to Planning a maximize parking on the property. When hosting very large events or multiple Natural Resources events at the school, visitors will be forced to seek out overflow parking. PFax:952.227.1110 Fax:952.227.1110 Potential overflow parking areas, beyond what is planned in the bus corral, P g include the shoulder areas of Lyman Boulevard, shoulder areas of the interior Public Wore; access roads, the shoulder areas of Lake Hazeltine Drive in Chaska, the private 1Park Road Phone:ne: 952.227.1300 parking lots in the Lake Hazeltine Industrial Park, and the residential streets in Fax.952.227.1310 the Stone Creek neighborhood. Most of these potential off -site overflow parking options are unsafe, the others are undesirable. Senior Center Phone: 522.27.1110 Fax 952.227.1110 TRAILS/PEDESTRIAN FLOW Web site The school site is a sizable property featuring many destinations. Much of the www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us movement throughout the site will be pedestrian -oriented. The school property will be accessed on nights and weekends by walkers and runners that will utilize the pedestrian accommodations on the site as part of their recreation route. Planning for predictable travel patterns and providing barrier -free trail and sidewalk access is critical. Areas of concern, based upon the submitted site plan, include the northeast quadrant of the building and access routes from the The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a chaffing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geal place to live, work, and play. Chanhassen High School Site Plan Review March 1, 2007 Page 2 north parking lot to the tennis courts and railroad trail underpass. At present, a Pedestrian route around the northeast comer of the buildings is not shown. A stairway adjacent to the north wall of the gymnasiums should be added to correct this deficiency. This would create an access from the north parking lot to the tennis court area. In addition, it is unclear if pedestrians moving between the north parking lot and the railroad trail underpass will have unobstructed access due to perimeter fencing and associated gates around the stadium area. ATHLETIC FIELD CAPACITY The site plan includes a variety of athletic fields and other sports -related amenities. However, the athletic fields provided on the property will likely not accommodate all the needs that will be generated by school sporting events. The School District will look to other district facilities and community -based facilities to fill the gap between demand and supply. At present, the City has very limited excess capacity at our athletic field facilities. Under a scenario in which the city would move to accommodate school district sporting events, existing community user groups would be displaced. This is not a desirable scenario from all perspectives. RECOMMENDATIONS An additional 48 parking stalls have been identified as an alternate finishing plan for the south parking lot. It is recommended that these stalls be included in the base bid package. As a potential measure to dramatically increase on -site athletic field capacity, an add/altemate bid item to install artificial turf in lieu of grass on the stadium field and two soccer fields has been proposed. Again, it is recommended that these alternates be included in the base bid package. In regard to trails and pedestrian flow, it is recommended that the described stairway be added on the north exterior wall of the gymnasium and sufficient accommodations be made for uninterrupted pedestrian access from the north parking lot to the railroad trail underpass. c: District 112 Schools Anderson -Johnson Associates Park and Recreation Commission Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Laurie Hokkanen, Assistant City Manager Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer Memo To: Dave Pokorney,Chaska CityAdministrator Kevin Ringwald, Chaska Director of Planning & Development Bill Monk,Chaska City Engineer From: Steve Wilker, Chaska Electrical Director The Chanhassen High School Project has proposed two roadways that affect the Bluff Creek Substation property, which is owned by the City of Chaska. The School District has requested that the Easterly roadway be built on the substation property beginning at the intersection of Lyman Blvd. and Audubon Rd., extending Northerly and Westerly thru the property. The City of Chaska has agreed to allow the roadway to be constructed on the substation property under the following conditions: The roadway shall be constructed in a corridor that least affects existing utilities in order to minimize utility relocations or modifications. 2. The School District shall pay the cost of any and all utility relocations or modifications necessary to accommodate the Easterly and Westerly roadways including but not limited to facilities owned by the City of Chaska, Embark Telephone Company, Qwest Telephone Company, Xcel Energy, Mediacom, Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative, Centerpoint Energy, Century Tel and all other affected utilities. 3. The School District shall provide all utility companies with a survey showing all existing overhead and underground utilities affected by the construction of the two roadways. The survey shall include existing ground elevations and proposed roadway locations and elevations. Submittals shall be paper copies and electronic data files in dwg and pdf formats. The dwg file shall be submitted in Carver County Coordinates. 4. Reconstruction of the existing substation driveway shall be done as a 9-ton urban section extending East to the substation fence and shall include a turn around area.Also there are minimum turning radius requirements to provide for ingress and egress of large trucks moving heavy substation equipment.Plans of the substation driveway shall be submitted to the City of Chaska for review and approval. 5. The School District shall modify the existing access and utility easement located on the West side of the substation from 40 feet in width to 60 feet in width. 6. The School District shall grant to the City of Chaska and other utility companies a utility easement being 30 feet in width from the Northwest corner of the substation property, Westerly to the East Right -of - Way line of Lyman Blvd in order to provide for installation of future utilities. 7. The City of Chaska agrees to grant the School District an easement over and thru the Bluff Creek Substation property for ingress, egress and drainage purposes. 8. The School District shall pay all costs associated with the establishment or modification of the easements associated with this project. The easements shall be filed at the Carver County Recorders office. ,o.4 Minnesota Department of Transportation ;�Metropolitan District ��P, Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 February 28, 2007 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Chanhassen High School site plan Mn/DOT Review # S 07-017 MAR 0 1 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Northwest quadrant of County Road (CSAH ?) 18 (Lyman Boulevard) and County Road (CSAH ?) 17, Audubon Road City of Chanhassen/Carver County Control Section 1008 Dear Ms. Aanenson: Thank you for the opportunity to review the above -referenced site plan. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Metro District has reviewed the site plan, as well as the Traffic Impact Study included within the EAW as Appendix A Before any further development, please address the following comments: Traffic: It appears that the intersections likely to be affected by High School traffic along TH 41, and TH 5, were not included in the EAW, nor in the Traffic Study. Any increase in daily traffic at these intersections as the result of the new High School may require intersection improvements. The EAW and the Traffic Impact Study included within the EAW should be revised, to include the TH 41 and TH 5 intersections impacted by the High School. Mitigation measures should also be proposed. Construction staging for the high school and traffic control should be coordinated with the TH 212 Design -Build Project and other transportation projects in the area. For questions on these points, please call Lars Impola, Mn/DOT Metro District Traffic Engineering Program Support Unit supervisor, at (651) 634-2151. Site Plan and drainage: The Mn/DOT Metro District TH 212 Design -Build Project office supplied the architect for the high school project with electronic CAD files earlier in February, 2007. These files showed features of the TH 212 design and construction process that will have an impact on the high school project. An equal opportunity employer The high school site plan we have reviewed does not include the information from the TH 212 Design -Build Project electronic files. The site plan for the high school needs to be updated to reflect the features included in these files. The update for the site plan will need to show Mn/DOT's conservation easement, as well as the updated wetland mitigation site detail, adjacent to the high school property. Stormwater runoff for the high school site should be coordinated with the wetland mitigation. For questions on these points, please call Mary Lacho, Mn/DOT Metro District Highway 212 Design Engineer, at (952) 368-5610. Please send the material requested to: Mary Lacho Highway 212 Design Engineer Mn/DOT Metro District 312 Hazeltine Drive Suite 100 Chaska, MN 55318 Permiu: A Mn/DOT drainage permit may be required. Any other work impacting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsgp/utility. Please include one full-size plan set, and a 11 x 17 inch plan set for each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30-day review and response process to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651) 582-1462. Sincerely, �ary McNeff Transportation Planner Copy: John Freemyer, Carver County Surveyor, Cologne, MN Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer, Cologne, MN Dave Drealan, Carver County Planning Department, Chaska, MN Mark S. Hanson, Sunde Land Surveying, LLC, Bloomington, MN Jay Pomeroy, Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., Minneapolis, MN NORTHWEST PARKING LOT — r PROPOSED NEW HIGH SCHOOL -- — aye 890 885 880 875 870 -- - ,-EXISTING WETLAND. — / _.20+00._.— 985 - 980 975 970 965 960 ocn ..PROPOSED STORM BASIN 3 -- -- 17+00 ___..___..____..____._-__..__. 18+00 New Chanhassen High School Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road I 0.•Y•A Rozeboom Miller Architects Inc. 244 First Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 ph: 612-332-2110 fax: 612-664-8152 Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. 7575 Golden Valley Road Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 ph: 763-544-7129 fax: 763-544-0531 PROJECT 157.001.00 SCALE 1" = 10' DATE 11 /01 /06 DRAWN DAR SITE PROFILE 930 925 920 915 910 905 900 895 — 890 85 - - - --- - ---- seo CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 875 ---- -- --- __—_ — _--_------ -----._ _.--_—_-- --- -- -.-- --- -. 870 zz+oo --- . --- - 23+00__ —._-- -24+00 __._. — 25+00. _.. _ _ _26+00 - . _. _. --_ - R I ,_ 1 Office of Administration District Education Center 11 Peavey Road School Chaska, Minnesota 55318 District (952) 556-6100 ...Preparing all learners June 13, 2007 to achieve their personal best Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Todd, kECEIVED JUN 1 4 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN This letter is a follow up to our phone conversation regarding one of the retaining walls on the Chanhassen High School site. Per discussion by the Chanhassen City Council during the permitting process, the Council preferred the School District look at the possibility of reducing the perceived height of a retaining wall adjacent to the entry road that leads out to Audubon. It was suggested that the wall be made into a two-tier structure. The District agreed to try to change the design, given both the limited amount of available land since it is extremely close to the wet- land buffer zone, and the probability of added expense. It was my understanding that night that while the Council wished for change to occur, it was also communicated that it needed to stay within reasonable redesign and cost limits. It appears that we are able redesign the wall in such a fashion that can stay within the available land restrictions. However, after receiving the attached Proposal Request from Rosti Construction, the contractor awarded the retaining wall contract, it appears to be cost prohibitive to make this change. Rosti Construction indicates it would add $123,400 to its contract to change the wall to a two-tier style. The District does not believe this cost justifies the added aesthetic benefit that would be gained by making this change. Per discussions we have had in the past, we will continue to "break up" the expanse of our retaining walls with trees, vegetation, and vines. We hope this will be an acceptable solution. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 952-556-6261. Sincerely, r t6�,t7-c� Steve Pumper Cc Kate Aanenson Bob Generours Serving the communities of Carver, Chanhassen, Chaska, and Victoria through equal opportunity in employment and education. 91ti ■ ROSTI CONSTRUCTION CO OF MN, INC. P. O. Box 243 Pbonc: Lakeville, MN 55044 Fax: May 25, 2007 To: Todd Iverson Bossardt Corporation From: Jeff Smith Project: New Chanhassen High School Subject: Retaining Wall Revisions -wails #2 & #5 Below please find a cost breakdown for the requested changes: 1 • Revision for wall 45: 952-4614376 952-4614377 • Deduct $40,080 • Cost breakdown is the following (per SF): Block $4 Georgrid $2 Aggregate $1 Labor $3 Equipment $2 for total of $12 per SF. 2. Revision for wall 42: • Add 3,300 SF @ $38 for atotal of Wall is to be two-tier style as shown. • Cost breakdown is the following (per SF): Block $14 Georgrid $6 Aggregate $5 Labor $6 Equipment $3 for total of $34 per SF. RECEIVED TIME MAY.25. 8:44AM 9/9 'd 000'0N d800 AOSS08 WdIZ:Z 001 'I 'Unf MEMORANDUM CyOF TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner CgANgASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: March 1, 2007 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 SUBJ: P ation Commission Site Plan Revie =Chanhassen Fax: 952.227.1110 'gh School ampus Building Inspections Phone: 952227.1180 Fax 952227.1190 On Tuesday, February 27, the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the site plan for the new Chanhassen High School. Representatives attending from Engineering Phone:952.221.1tfi0 School District 112 included Steve Pumper, Director of rations and Finance; � Fax:952.227.1170 Paul Schuleter, Director of Buildings and Grounds; and Jay Pomeroy and Jonathan Duesman both of Anderson -Johnson Associates. Mr. Duesman gave a Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 presentation to the Commission explaining the planning efforts that focused on Fax 952.227.1110 the exterior of the building. The remaining representatives also provided input into the conversation and answered questions from the commission. The Park 6 Recreation Phan: 952227,1120 followingareas were identified for additional stud y' Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center NEED TO MAXIMIZE PARKING CAPACITY ON THE SITE 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 With the only obvious overflow parking option being the shoulders of Lyman Fax:952.227.1404 Boulevard, the Park and Recreation Commission believes it is important to Planning 6 maximize parking on the property. When hosting very large events or multiple Natural Resources events at the school, visitors will be forced to seek out overflow parking. PFax.9522.27.1110 Fax. 952.227.1110 Potential overflow parking areas, beyond what is planned in the bus corral, p g include the shoulder areas of Lyman Boulevard, shoulder areas of the interior Public works access roads, the shoulder areas of Lake Hazeltine Drive in Chaska, the private 1Park Road Phone:ne: 952.227.1300 parking lots in the Lake Hazeltine Industrial Park, and the residential streets in Fax:952.227,1310 the Stone Creek neighborhood. Most of these potential off -site overflow parking options are unsafe, the others are undesirable. Senior Center Pax 9522227.1110 227.1125 F Fax 95 TRAU S/PEDESTRIAN FLOW Web site The school site is a sizable property featuring many destinations. Much of the www.ci.chanhassen mnus movement throughout the site will be pedestrian -oriented. The school property will be accessed on nights and weekends by walkers and runners that will utilize the pedestrian accommodations on the site as part of their recreation route. Planning for predictable travel patterns and providing barrier -free trail and sidewalk access is critical. Areas of concern, based upon the submitted site plan, include the northeast quadrant of the building and access routes from the SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gieal place to live, work, and play. Chanhassen High School Site Plan Review March I, 2007 Page 2 north parking lot to the tennis courts and railroad trail underpass. At present, a Pedestrian route around the northeast comer of the buildings is not shown. A stairway adjacent to the north wall of the gymnasiums should be added to correct this deficiency. This would create an access from the north parking lot to the tennis court area. In addition, it is unclear if pedestrians moving between the north parking lot and the railroad trail underpass will have unobstructed access due to perimeter fencing and associated gates around the stadium area. ATHLETIC FIELD CAPACITY The site plan includes a variety of athletic fields and other sports -related amenities. However, the athletic fields provided on the property will likely not accommodate all the needs that will be generated by school sporting events. The School District will look to other district facilities and community -based facilities to fill the gap between demand and supply. At present, the City has very limited excess capacity at our athletic field facilities. Under a scenario in which the city would move to accommodate school district sporting events, existing community user groups would be displaced. This is not a desirable scenario from all perspectives. RECOMMENDATIONS An additional 48 parking stalls have been identified as an alternate finishing plan for the south parking lot. It is recommended that these stalls be included in the base bid package. As a potential measure to dramatically increase on -site athletic field capacity, an add/altemate bid item to install artificial turf in lieu of grass on the stadium field and two soccer fields has been proposed. Again, it is recommended that these alternates be included in the base bid package. In regard to trails and pedestrian flow, it is recommended that the described stairway be added on the north exterior wall of the gymnasium and sufficient accommodations be made for uninterrupted pedestrian access from the north parking lot to the railroad trail underpass. c: District 112 Schools Anderson -Johnson Associates Park and Recreation Commission Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Laurie Hokkanen, Assistant City Manager Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer O-1—ose7 CITY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952 227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227,1180 Fax: 952 227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 MEMORANDUM TO: Park and Recreation Commission FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director DATE: February 16, 2007 SUBJ: Site Plan Review — Chanhassen High School Campus Independent School District 112 is preparing to open the doors to the new Chanhassen High School in the fall of 2009. The school will be located on Lyman Boulevard on a 94.8-acre parcel of land purchased by the district in 2004 at a cost of $9,165,000 or approximately $97,000 per acre. The site is bound by Lyman Boulevard on the south and west, the Twin Cities and Northern Railroad on the north, shares common lot lines with the City of Chanhassen's Bluff Creek Preserve and two private homes on the east, and with the City of Chaska's electrical substation on the south. A gas pipeline owned and operated by Magellan is located on the property running east to west and north of center. The pipeline is protected by a significant "no touch" easement and represents one of the most challenging design considerations on the site. Recreation Center The site design definitely maximizes the use of available space. The need to 2310 Coulter Boulevard construct significant recreation and athletic facilities in combination with the Phone:952.227.1400 presence of the pipeline has resulted in the use of extensive retaining walls. Fax:952.227.1404 Additional retaining walls are required to permit the co struction of access roads Planning A to the building pad. Representatives of the district have�ipformed me that they Natural Resources studied the site design and layout extensively, with many aft proposals making Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 their way to the trash heap prior to arriving at the proposed site design. The plan does include a pedestrian trail connection at the northeast comer of the site, in Public Work; addition to pedestrian connections at all three road intersections on Lyman 1591 Park Road Boulevard. A trail will be constructed on the north side of Lyman Boulevard as Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 one component of reconstruction of that road prior to the school opening. Senior Center I have invited representatives from the School District to your February meeting Phone. 9522.27.1110 to make a presentation and allowing time for question and answer period. Fax 952.227.1110 P g 9 Please review the site plan submitted to familiarize yourself with the project and Web site come prepared to discuss this exciting proposal. www.ci.chan hassen. mn.us ATTACHMENTS 1. Development Review Application Letter dated January 31, 2007 from Anderson -Johnson Associates Inc. 2. Site Plan 3. Location Map ft#i ft The City of Chanhassen e A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. January 31, 2007 Mr. Bob Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING cnvof CHRt1HA=4 RECEIVED FEB 0 2 20O? al-1-1 inn P1/ :^ 3 VPT RE: Development Review Application Proposed New High School - Chanhassen Chaska Public Schools - ISD 112 Dear Mr. Generous: On behalf of Independent School District #112 and Rozeboom Miller Architects, we are pleased to provide the enclosed information in support of the proposed New High School in Chanhassen. With this packet, we are applying for the following permits: - Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - Rezoning (from A2 to 0-1) - Site Plan Review - Variances - Wetland Alteration Permit As you know, the School District received approval for an Interim Use Permit (for early grading work) and received acceptance of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) from the City of Chanhassen in December 2006. We understand that receipt of this application and supportive information, and your determination of the packet's completeness, will allow us to be on the March 6, 2007 Planning Commission agenda. General Proiect Description Existine Conditions The 94.8 acre parcel is bordered along its north side by the Twin Cities &Western Railroad; to its west and south by Lyman Blvd.; and Bluff Creek and its adjacent wetlands to the east. Chaska's electrical substation lies between the school's south property line and the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road. The majority of the property is currently farmed for agricultural purposes with the highest point of the site and the steep grades along its east boundary are made up of native grasses and trees. A fairly significant wooded area lies along the south edge of the property. The old farm homestead, with some remnants still remaining, lies in the southwest VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER • SURE 200 • 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD • MINNEAPOUS, MN 55427 PHONE (763) 544-7129 • FAx (763) 544-0531 comer of the site just opposite Hazeltine Lake Drive. Existing wetlands predominantly lie along the east edge of the property with localized fingers extending at the north and south edges of the property toward the west. Approximately 25 acres of wetlands areas exist within the property limits. The topography of the property varies in elevation from 985 at the lowest point (east) to 1075 at the top of the grass bluff in the center of the site. Because the center of the site is at the highest elevation, drainage typically is directed toward the extents of the property eventually reaching either the bluff creek wetlands to the east or to the Lyman Boulevard ditch to the west and south. Drainage immediately south of the bluff will be carried to Bluff Creek via a fairly significant natural gorge immediately north of the electrical substation. Domestic water is available at the northwest the northeast comers of the site. A 12" water main extends approximately 200' south of the northeast property comer where it terminates. Water off the northwest comer of the property actually lies north of the railroad tracks and at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Galpin Boulevard. Sanitary (trunk) sewer is located along the length of the east property line and connects the neighborhood to the north to a point extending south of the Lyman Blvd. and Audubon Drive intersection. Proposed Site Improvements - Complete Build -out The new high school campus includes parking for approximately 1,000 cars, bus parking for approximately 30 buses and overflow and event parking for an additional 80 vehicles. Three entrance drives of Lyman Boulevard provide access to the school site. The south entrance drive is at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road and will primarily support bus and event parking. The proposed entrance drive at the southwest comer of the site, at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Lake Hazeltine Drive, will serve for limited ingress/ egress. The entrance drive west of the school will serve as the primary/ main entrance for students, visitors and service deliveries. With the existence of the Magellan gas pipeline north of the school and north parking lot, the athletic facilities find themselves north of the pipeline easement. The exception to this is the proposed tennis courts and soccer fields which lie just south of the Magellan easement and are located northeast and northwest of the building, respectively. Softball and baseball facilities are located in the northwest quadrant of the site and are tucked between the gas main and railroad tracks. The running track and field stadium, which is aligned in a northwest -southeast direction will be carved into the hillside to allow the home bleachers to transition from an upper spectator plaza down to the field level. Home bleachers for 1,600 spectators and visitor bleachers for 800 spectators are provided. Field events, including high jump, long/triple jump, pole vault, shotput, and discus are located along the east and southeast corners of the running track. Practice fields will be developed in the northeast quadrant of the site and tucked between the railroad tracks and existing wetland areas. We have met with Carver County regarding the potential upgrades of Lyman Boulevard. We understand that until there is a "Design and Construction Agreement"between Carver County and the cities of Chanhassen and Chaska, formal design of Lyman Blvd. cannot take place. With that in mind and in an effort to anticipate the impacts of the Lyman Blvd. upgrades, we have provided a general layout for the proposed 4-lane roadway with turn -lanes into/ out of the school site. Bob, with this application we are providing the following information: 1. Completed application - Development Review Application; 2. Fees will be submitted directly by ISD #112 as follows: a. Conditional Use Permit (CUP): $425 b. Rezoning (from A2 to 0-1): $500 C. Site Plan Review: $500 + $4,000 (see note below) d. Variances: S200 C. Wetland Alteration Permit: $275 f. Notification Sign and Escrow: $850 3. Legal Description of property; 4. Plan Sheets (16 full-size sets folded, (1) 11 "x 17" copy and (1) 8.5"xl 1" ); 5. Costs associated with the Trunk Water Main along Lyman Boulevard; 5. Colored renderings (6 copies); 6. Disk (PDF files of the Plan Sheets). We trust the enclosed information satisfies the City's requirements. If you have any questions or require additional or revised information, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Jay R. Pomeroy, LLA Project Manager enclosure cc: Steve Pumper - Chaska Public Schools - ISD 112 Steve Miller - Rozeboom Miller Architects 1 i Mark Bosch - Bossardt Corporation Location Map Chanhassen High School Planning Case No. 07-06 City of Chanhassen City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 Date: February 5, 2007 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Robert Generous, Senior PI er Subject: Request for Rezoning from A 'cultural Estate District, A2, to office and Institutional District; Site Plan approval with Variances for High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concessi n building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots; a Conditional Use Permit with V 'ances for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District; and a Wetland Alteration Permit for th grading and filling of wetlands on site. Applicant: Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc. and Independent Sc 1 District 112. Planning Case: 07-06 Chanhassen High School The above described application for approval of a land�development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on February 2, 2007. The 60-day review p�pod ends April 3, 2007. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning e proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the n street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can n Council. ing Commission and City Council review, we would impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and ed for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, oids or problems exist, we would like to have a written da recommendation to the Planning Commission and City This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen PI g Commission on March 6, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate rec Ming your comments by no later than February 23, 2007. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you o desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney C. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carvounty a. Engineer b.'Environmental Services 8. Watershed,District Engineer a. ttr b. Lo c. Mi 9. Telephone Minnesota River laha Creek 10. Electric Company 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy 13. City of Chaska Creek (Qwest or Sarint(United) Energy or MN Valleyl iM �f e O N 6 N G C7-O(-- CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO. 4/19/07 2007-06 ATTENTION Sue Nelson RE: Document Recording ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 3/26/07 07-06 Site Plan Permit 07-06 Chanhassen High School THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ® For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO: Steve Pumper, Independent School District 1 " If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT #07-06 SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated March 26, 2007, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and Independent School District 112, (the 'Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot, three-story building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A --Site Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan B--Grading & Drainage Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan C—Landscaping Plan prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan D--Utility Plans prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. Plan E--Electric Plan prepared by Hallberg Engineering, PC, dated 02-01-07. Plan F--Architectural Plan prepared by Rozeboom Miller Architects, Inc., dated 02-02-07. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by August 1, 2009. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $5,000.00 (boulevard restoration, erosion control and landscaping). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said landscaping. PROCEDURESFOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Steven Pumper Independent School District 112 11 Peavey Road Chaska, MN 55318 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. City Council approves the Site Plan with Variance for a three- story building and up lighting for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square -foot building, athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots, subject to the following conditions: a. The developer shall add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas, plazas and scenic overlooks. Bicycle parking pads and storage racks shall be provided on site. b. The developer shall include angled visitor parking in the drop-off access west of the building entrance. c. The building fagade flood lights shall be permitted contingent upon meeting the intent of the lighting ordinance and subject to city review and approval. d. Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalks or trails connect. 2 e. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by opening day of the school: • Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection. • Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for the addition of a north leg to the intersection. • Construct the following turn lanes: Approach Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North Bypass lane School Access Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North 200 feet School Access Westbound North School Access at Through lane becomes 300 feet Lyman Boulevard turn lane Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet Hazeltine Drive Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 100 feet Lyman Boulevard Westbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 300 feet Build through/right Lyman Boulevard Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon 200 feet Road South Westbound Lyman Boulevard at 200 feet Audubon Road South Northbound Audubon Road South at Build to add through Lyman Boulevard lane Southbound Audubon Road South at 200 feet Build through/right Lyman Boulevard • In addition the School District shall participate in the cost of the upgrading of Lyman Boulevard on a fair and equitable basis. f. Building Official Conditions: 1) The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 2) The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3) Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls). 4) Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. g. Fire Marshal Conditions: 1) A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 2) Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 3) Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 4) Yellow curbing and "No Parking Fire Lane" signs will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of signs to be installed. 5) No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6) Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.4. In. Forester Conditions: 1) Increase plantings for parking lot area in order to meet ordinance requirement of 156 trees. 2) Replace Black Hills spruce seedlings with white spruce. 3) Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected. Fencing shall be installed around trees prior to grading. 4) Understory seedlings shall be located among overstory deciduous trees. 5) The applicant shall increase the quantity of seedlings planted in each grouping. 6) All deciduous seedlings shall be protected by tree tubes. Tubes shall be monitored and removed at the appropriate time. All tubes shall be fitted with protective bird netting. 7) All ash trees shall be replaced by an alternative species. ld 8) The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yard plantings along the east property line. Native shrubs and vines shall be incorporated into the landscape in addition to trees. 9) The columnar Norway maple shall be replaced with a different columnar tree such as Armstrong red maple, Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species. i. Engineer Conditions: 1) The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses to Lyman Boulevard. 2) ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska to construct the access through the substation property. 3) Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland/wetland mitigation and Lyman Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100-year event. 4) Additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future width of Lyman Boulevard will be treated in the ponds. 5) Hydrology to the wetland/wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point must be maintained. 6) The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting. 7) The development team should reexamine the proposed grades within the infield of softball field 1 to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher's mound. 8) Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner. 9) Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must be approved by the appropriate private utilities. 10) Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan. 11) The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer. 12) Pond, drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands. 13) The developer must adjust the sanitary sewer manhole elevations according to City standard detail plates. 14) The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine if the high school construction has damaged the pipe. If the City televises this sanitary sewer before the high school construction mobilized, the developer will only be required to televise the line after construction is complete. 15) The school district will be reimbursed $166,424.00 which is the cost difference between the 18-inch trunk and 10-inch lateral watermain. 16) Trunk water fees must be paid with the building pemvt based on the City Water Access Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued. 17) The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds. 18) Based on the proposed utility plan, an irrigation meter is required. 19) The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer, existing overhead utilities and existing gas pipelines. 20) Mylar and digital as-builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver County coordinates. j. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions: 1) Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner compliant with the project's Wetland Alteration Permit, Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). 2) The project shall comply with the conditions of its Conditional Use Permit for Development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 3) The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including all information required by the NPDES Construction Site Permit shall be located at the job trailer. 4) Stable emergency overflows shall be provided for the proposed ponds on site. The emergency overflows shall be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed. The emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re -enforcement mat or fabric and riprap. 5) The plan shall include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site. The timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow area. The rate of mulch application shall also be included on the plans (2 tons per acre, disc anchored). 6) All riprap/fabric at the flared end section shall be installed within 24 hours of flared end section installation. 7) Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8) Silt fence that is not placed on the contour shall have 7-Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet. 9) Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas. The areas of temporary sediment basins shall be labeled on the plan. A temporary and/or permanent sediment pond shall be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared End Sections (FES) 7 and 8. This shall be installed prior to grading and then used as a temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland. If it is used as a temporary pond, it should stay in place until all turf is established. Temporary outlet structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) shall be provided for the ponds; details should be provided. 10) Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering methods from the City's project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior to conducting any and all dewatering on -site. 11) Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets. 12) The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen's standard details for erosion and sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A). 13) The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area. 14) Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 15) The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (i.e., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. k. The applicant and city staff shall look at reasonable alternative designs to reduce the impact of the retaining walls. 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit 'B" and incorporated herein. BY: %- M Fi %-A� as A. urlong, or Z1140i-jo N-1i AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager DEVELOPER: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 112 BY: Steven Pumper Its Director of Finance and Operations STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this��lay of 200-1, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and Qursul to the authority granted by its City Council. J / � � d STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF KAREN J. ENGELHARDT Notary Public -Minnesota ly Commission Expires Jan 31, 2010 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .41 *,day of Q PA14- 2007by Steven Pumper, the Director of Finance and Operations of Independent School District 112, on behalf of the developer. SANDRA J. NEAL Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Wrnaola WMICoaeiam E¢w imam 31.2010 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Per Warranty Deed Document No. 148445) That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter comer of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast comer thereof, thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest comer thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00feet along said east line to the point of beginning. O Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest corner of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. 10 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMTr E) H ]T "B" GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims 11 made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomeys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attomeys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on -site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmasters request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building pemrits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall 12 not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Re lug ations. In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions, The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. 13 A o—)—osIv Jul 2000 M�.St2!�2 000 a r2000S M11 T W T F T F S M T W T F S13 45 1 22 3 4 5 6 -_ .8 10.11 12 3 a -5 6] 8-�99 10 11 12 13 14 15 1]-18 19 10.11--12 13 14 15.1616 1] 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 1]-18.19 20 21 22 2323 24 25 26 21 28 29 31 -- 24 25 26 2r 26 29 303031 _.._. _. _.__........... . ... ..._....._. __....... Securities Ltati Due _ S P _-..Category Description 7/1107 8/1/07 F Escrows J Cash Escrow Chanhassen High School Site Plan Agreernent 07-06 Planning Case 2007-06 $5,000 Boulevard Restoration Erosion Control landscaping ISD 112 Paid $5,000 Check No. 5709 Notify Bob Generous o2W7 Lolw oe✓elopmam Cor,. u1007et 1 M I'M S+Su%M P=Rbny PW t ;'IDEPENDFNTSC11001. DISTRICT Il_' ° CH ASKA, AIN 5531E BL ILDISG F1 AU Account Number Invoice P/O # Amount Disc Paid 11.064.840.000.00541.000 SITE PLAN PERMI 5,000.00 5,000.00 Vendor 15021 Voucher 00606 4/11/07 5709 Check Total 5,000.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 04/12/2007 3:03 PM Receipt No. 0039841 CLERK: betty PAYEE: Ind School Dist #112 Blvd restoration, landscape and erosion escrow ------------------------------------------------------- Security Escrow 5,000.00 Total Cash Check 5709 Change 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 rPinnacle r Engineering September 11, 2006 Ms. Lori Haak Water Resources Coordinator 7700 Market Blvd. PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Wetland Delineation Pmeec,§ Elryeeemv Im.. Tee.. 76331-14501 11541950AvemeNOM Fax 763315-4W7 Maple Gm . Mlmesote W69 wxw.e ZP2 mn Chanhassen High School, Lyman Drive, Chanhassen, MN Pinnacle Project Number. MN06233.00 Dear Lori, The purpose of this letter is to give you an idea of how I came to my conclusions concerning the suspect area for the wetland delineation project in Chanhassen, Minnesota on Galpin Boulevard. I came to the conclusion that this area did not meet the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual wetland criteria due to the lack hydrology and vegetation. Included with this explanation is a data sheet that was completed on July 10, 2006. I reviewed the aerial photos readily available, a 1991 and a recent aerial photo. The recent aerial photo depicts ponded water within the suspect area in the northwest portion of the Site adjacent Galpin Boulevard. However, the 1991 aerial photo depicts the suspect area as lighter in color that the upland area of the same soil type to the south of it. This indicated drier soils in the suspect area than in the upland area adjacent the delineated wetland. Additionally, the National Welland Inventory Map (NWI) was over laid with the surveyed wetland area; it appears that the NWI identified wetland correlates more with an arm of the wetland 1 than the suspect area. Precipitation for Carver County was 9.96 inches for the time period of April, May and June. The normal precipitation for the area is 10.73 for the same time period. The area was 0.77 inches below normal. I believe the suspect area has its hydrology supplied by surficial runoff collecting within the low lying area prior to draining into wetland 1. With near normal precipitation, I expected the suspect area would have at a minimum saturated soils. However, this was not the case. The soils, while they consist of hydric Hamel soils, were not saturated and only moist to a depth of 40 inches. Lori Haak Pinnacle Project Number: MN06233.00 September 11, 2001 Page 2 The vegetation within the suspect area consisted of corn and nightshade. These plants appeared to be in good condition. They did not exhibit signs of water related stress, such as yellowed leaves or stunted growth. The surrounding plants, also did not exhibit stressed conditions. However, due to the planted and invasive nature of these plants, they were given less importance in the wetland determination. If you have any questions , please contact Mike Hultgren or me at (763) 315-4501. We look forward to being of continued service to you. Sincerely, PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. Scott Thelen Project Manager - Natural Resources Lori Haak Pinnacle Project Number: MN06233.00 September 11, 2001 Page 3 1991 Aerial Photograph It n Pinnacle Engineering 1154195th Avenue North, Maple Grove, MN 55369 Phone: 763315-4501, Fax: 763-315-4507 Figure 3. National Wetland Inventory Map Chanhassen High School Lyman Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota a DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Pr ject/Site: Date: 7//0f.6o Applicant/Owner: SU OC County: Cr2 Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)^ Yes ® Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes (If needed, explain on reverse) Transect ID: kV /— fti Plot ID: # Of Flags: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Common name Stratum Indicator 1. M/irSR �6/f .✓ H c� v9 2 N.a v.� .cNrI6 Lr GUI L 3. a. — s. 6. T 8. 9. Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling int that are OBL, FACW or FAC(excluding FAC-). Remarks: A4c4t 44-"7 A,*-7—I IV'4».,/ P-4Wo, Aor &91-4%� -T ►r o,rG/`f HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge _L—Aerial Photographs 1 #A r Other No Recorded Data Available Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: _Inundated _Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _Water Marks _Drift Lines _Sediment Deposits Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) —Water-Stained Leaves _Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) s "�7 Remarks: y t tia riy��4� �-G 5AT✓a�utY7 �G SOILS Transect ID: IN 3 - / Plot [D: N Of Flags Map Unit Name ,J Series HAM and Phase): Drainage Class: 40 Field Observations Taxonom (Sub ): Confirm M T Y No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 16 y/7 2/ y Hydric Soil Indicators (soil Profile): Histosol Concreiions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils _Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions ---ZTGleyed Low-Chroma Listed on National Hydric Soils list or Colors Other (Explain: in Remarks) Remarks: SoAt hsrsr td r10'r� A&Vfi %/-L4er f70rft Serer e 3dr'j7j 40 WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (Circle) Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes o (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �! Hydric Soils Present? (n No Remarks:/4,R flkjIrS G9'8w *10PA� poFre, r f. P "7- RNefr�r' r /+S n-a HX0#eo1e6y Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 4/12/07 Sue Nelson Document ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 12/11/06 06-34 Conditional Use Permit 06-34 Autobahn Motor lex 1 3/26/07 07-06 Wetland Alteration Permit 07-06 Chanhassen High School 1 3/26/07 07-06 Conditional Use Permit 07-06 Chanhassen High School THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Foryouruse ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ® For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO: Bruno Silikowski Steve Pumper, Independent School District 119 N enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. SCANNED z r CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, NHNNESOTA WETLAND ALTERATION PERNUT #2007-06 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a wetland alteration permit for the following use: For the grading and filling of wetlands on the site of the Chanhassen High School, plans prepared by Pinnacle Engineering, dated February 9, 2007. 2. Promem. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 3. Conditions. The Wetland Alteration Permit was approved subject to the following conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. All wetlands and wetland buffer areas shall be protected by silt fence during grading. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans. b. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). c. The applicant shall provide additional information as to how the vegetative_ communities and hydrology for Wetlands C and D will be re-established. d. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. e. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: March 26, 2007 CTTY OF CHANHASSEN By: {+h SEAL M STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20-LL by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City 9f Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. , Q91ary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard " ' a :NotarY EN J. ENGELHARDT P.O. Box 147 Publ'w-Minnesota Chanhassen, MN 55317 nmrwn FXprea+a^ (952)227-1107 2 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Per Warranty Deed Document No. 148445) That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter comer of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast comer thereof, thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest corner thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.O0feet along said east line to the point of beginning. U Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest corner of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. 4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, NIINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2007-06 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: Development within the Bluff Creek Corridor with a Variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary zone, in conformance with the grading plans prepared by Anderson -Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 3. Conditions. The permit is issued for the Chanhassen High School to develop within the Bluff Creek Corridor with a Variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary zone, with the following conditions: a. The construction activities associated with the proposed project shall not conflict with the easement granted to MnDOT for its wetland mitigation project. b. To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor, the applicant shall submit a plan for the restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor (including the drainageway along the north side of the substation and the area east of the bus/event entrance) with species consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan." 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: March 26, 2007 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Tom Furlong, a4l—UWAND: odd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this/0#day of�, 2001, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. N T Y PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen P. O. Box 147 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 ,'`""'�. KAREN J. ENGELHgRDT Notary Public -Minnesota �, �mmyp�pn EaPno Jon 31. 2010 2 EXH Mff A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Per Warranty Deed Document No. 148445) That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as: Beginning at the north quarter comer of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 969.75 feet along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138.88 feet to the center line of County Road No. 117, thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a distance of 56.45 feet, thence Southeasterly 484.22 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 3322.60 feet, thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241.78 feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570.38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter to the southeast corner thereof, thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 1326.84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Outlot B, CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 (Excelsior and Shakopee Road) and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a fine running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 660.00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet east of the northwest corner thereof. Less and except the following described tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described, thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line, thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet, thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58• feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00feet along said east line to the point of beginning. 3 Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the east side thereof. Subject to other easements, reservations or restrictions, if any. Subject to a public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements, reservations or restrictions of record. Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress, being 40 feet in width, lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the southwest comer of the above -described tract; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 321.50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45.00 feet; thence southwesterly 46.69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 224.89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public roadway and said centerline there terminating. It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of land described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West, assumed bearing, 2649.54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, said point also being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 499.83 feet along said south line; thence northwesterly 247.29 feet along the center of a public roadway on a non -tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954.93 feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds, chord bearing North 72 degrees 54 minutes 36 seconds West 246.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West 592.50 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377.58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550.00 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. 4 C)"7 - C se CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL - PLANNING CASE 07-06 $425 Conditional Use Permit $500 Rezoning $200 Variance $275 Wetland Alteration Permit $200 Recording Escrow $4,500 Site Plan Review $200 Notification Sign $6,300 Paid Check #5686 SCANNED