The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-01_SAND COMPANIES CONCEPT PUDCity Council Meeting — Ju•27, 2005 P Councilman Lundquist: I would move that the City Council approve Variance 05-17 for a 5 foot variance for a minimum 10 foot side yard setback to build a storage shed on a riparian lot zoned Single Family RSF with conditions 1 as published in the staff report. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion on that motion? If there is none, I will proceed with the vote. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approves Variance #05-17 for a 5 foot variance from the minimum 10 foot side yard setback to build a storage shed on a riparian lot zoned Single Family Residential (RSF), with the following condition: Construction of the shed shall match the principal structure by using vertical siding on the exterior of the shed and painting the shed the same color as the principal structure. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. SAND COMPANIES, INC.: LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LYMAN BOULEVARD AND REALIGNED 101: PLANNING CASE 05-N— o � - U 1 A. REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, MIXED USE. B. CONSIDER LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR TAX CREDIT APPLICATION. Kate Aanenson: Thank you. Sorry, I've got a big board here. This item appeared before the Planning Commission on June 7'h. Part of that, you had reviewed this under a conceptual PUD, as did the Planning Commission. Again they wanted to get a read from the Planning Commission and the City Council regarding acquisition of the property. The Sand Companies now has acquired the property. Again the location of the property is, this is the widened, proposed widened Lyman Boulevard and then the new 101. Current location right here and the new 101 moving to the west. So obviously development of these two parcels is predicated on the relocation of the infrastructure and improvements to the property. Again 212 divides this property. The northern piece which would have access via Lake Susan Drive, and the south portion access via 101 and tied through to Lyman Boulevard. The purpose of the meeting tonight is just to review the PUD development standards. They will have to come back for specific site plan review on each project, so again that's kind of tied into a little bit more of the 212. So with that, I'm going to really kind of focus on the PUD design standards themselves. The PUD that we put in place is pretty similar to the one that we actually put over on the Park and Ride facility. Just kind of want to go through that. In the comprehensive plan this is guided for mixed use development so it does allow for neighborhood commercial as stated in the comprehensive plan, and for residential up to 16 units an acre. The plan contemplates, if you go 15 sWKO 0 0 City Council Meeting — June 27, 2005 to page 8 of the staff report, the design standards, the intent is that this be a mixed use PUD. Neighborhood commercial and office residential. Again the purpose of the mixed neighborhood as we build, this is an appropriate scale based on existing residential in the area. Making sure we've got good transition. Again we're calling out specific uses. For example office in this location provided a good buffer for noise attenuation from the neighbors. Because we have a 600 deck, or 600 parking deck. 600 cars in this parking deck, there's an opportunity for some of the commercial support here as well as the residential that combines with that, so again we wanted the commercial to be such a scale that it provides for those immediate neighbors. So if you look at the permitted uses that we put in here, small to medium restaurant or no single use to exceed 8,000 square feet. A drive thru bank would be the only one that we'd want to see a drive thm window, and that's not necessarily bad because sometimes those speakers are loud. Daycare. Again the goal there was to be a commercial that would be support a neighborhood use. Not one large user from a regional draw but more again to support what's going on in the neighborhood. And again the maximum number of units, we capped at 150. Again that would go to the site plan and I think they're pretty close on what they're looking at for specifically C, which would be the northern half looking at that, if our townhouses and then the apartment building there, and then the other apartment building would be at this location but then the rest of this would be either strip retail or office in that area. We did in the PUD provide setbacks. Because it is a PUD there is transitional and buffering requirements. Again we did cap the commercial so it's all residential, if they decided to go all commercial in the PUD, again this PUD spells out what that balance should be so we have some residential and some commercial again to protect ourselves if something, one big box user wanted to proceed. And that again was the intent with not any single user greater than 8,000 square feet, and that's pretty typical of what we've done in neighborhood commercial, and that would be similar to what we have on Highway 5 or the two intersections. Mayor Furlong: If I can interrupt. Is it 8,000 or 5,000? Kate Aanenson: 8,000. Mayor Furlong: In the neighborhood commercial? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: This says 8,000. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: I guess I had 5,000 in my mind but you're saying 8 is what we've done? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, for any single use. Yeah. I typically, when we have uses that are a lot smaller than that. Even restaurants. You can get some, a drive, not a drive thru but a walk in restaurant that could be 1,500. Again that's to stay... a less desirable use. That doesn't meet the daily needs. Again we put standards in place for residential and materials and for the commercial too. What our expectations are for design and the developer has agreed with those. Again we try to call all the things that we believe and would meet to make the project... Again 16 ajil es.Z.3 City Council Meeting — June 7, 2005 • as specific projects come in, not to say just as we have done with other PUD's, that we may have to do some adjusting but again this is for them to help market because the Sand Companies who is the developer will own their residential component, but the commercial it's the intent to spin off so we want to make sure we have clear direction and what our expectations are. So with that the Planning Commission on a 7-0 vote recommended approval and staff is also recommending approval of the PUD. So I'd be happy to answer any questions that you have. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for staff. Councilman Peterson: Kate under your PUD design standards, you're basically pulling those from previous developments that are similar in nature? Kate Aanenson: Correct. And we also have added the multi -family design standards that we just proposed to you last fall, that the Planning Commission did and then so those are also included as far as inclusion of a little more brick in some of the residential. Councilman Peterson: And that's really my question I think I've been kind of like a broken record. The bigger the buildings we get, the more concerned I am about, about just the look and feel, the appropriateness to the neighborhood. So that it's not a big box and I know that with the PUD we have the ability to hold quite a bit of leverage on that. And I think, as one council person, I'd be more aggressive in saying I really want something different. I don't know what that is until, I know what I don't like. Kate Aanenson: Well, I think we did give them some folders to look at, at what our expectation is to make sure that we're speaking the same way, and obviously one of the easiest ways is through the articulation so it's not flat walls. Similar to what we did at Presbyterian Homes where you've got the balconies. Some of the movement of the buildings and I believe that we're in concurrence on that and these design standards reflect that. Councilman Peterson: Okay. Mayor Furlong: Other questions. A couple questions that came up in the Planning Commission meeting, both from the commissioners as well as from residents. One was the issue of the location of the pedestrian trail and I don't know if that's something maybe we want to address. I know that we were focusing on a trail for one side but that doesn't necessarily mean that there has to be crossing of 101 for people for north or south access. Kate Aanenson: This is a tough struggle and the cost issue too, and I'll let Todd talk about some of it but when we put together the 101 with MnDot, we actually put the sidewalk on this side of the street. A lot of the commercial is over here. So for this portion of the Sand Companies, which is on the other side of 212, it does mean if you want to go to the commercial immediately south, so they don't run across 212. There's not an opportunity to do another underpass for cross purposes. So you would have to cross, come down and then cross again. It's not the best. Todd Hoffman: It's one way or the other. The Mission Hills people, they're going to be happy. So one side or the other. 17 City Council Meeting — Jun• , 2005 • Mayor Furlong: If this development was on the east side, it probably wouldn't come up. Todd Hoffman: And as we moved through the process of developing the pedestrian routes through the Highway 212 corridor, it was our position we would put those trails on one side of each bridge and so you have to pick one side or the other. One thing to note is that this is shown in the wrong location on Lyman. This trail is on the north side, so you will have an opportunity to leave this neighborhood, through a trail and then access this property without crossing a major intersection or major road, so for this route we took the neighborhood route and something to keep in mind when you plan these trail connections, you always want to put the trail on the side of the street where the homes are at. But in this case you have residents in homes along the entire corridor. Mission Hills, large neighborhood. Chanhassen Hills, large neighborhood. We also want to make the most defined connection between our downtown and the southern corridor of our park system at Bandimere Community Park so those are some of the reasons we stayed on the east side at this location. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. The other, one of the other issues that came up at Planning Commission was the height of the apartment building. Limitation of the apartment building. think the applicant actually brought that up. Right now it's at 35 and they were saying something higher is typical. Kate Aanenson: It's 35. Mayor Furlong: That's what we have in here? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Mayor Furlong: And that's throughout. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I'm not sure whether the interpretation of the height... Mayor Furlong: Why don't you come up to the microphone sir. You or someone from your group is going to be here in a second anyways so. Richard Hennings: I'm Richard Hennings, the architect for Sand Companies, and I'm the person that brought that up just because I'm concerned that if, at least in my mind it runs a little counter productive, or counter intuitive to your design standards in that, in that it allows 3 stories but our 3 story buildings, just by the nature of how they're built nowadays are 28 feet to the top floor ceiling. 29 feet to the spring line of the truss, and if you maintain the 35 foot average, it really limits you to maybe a 4:12 pitch, and that's probably the last thing you want to do is have real flat roofs on these buildings, and so I know the Planning Commission said we should just talk about that during the individual, each individual building and that's okay, but it does seem that those two things may be butting heads with each other a little bit in my mind. IF City Council Meeting — Ju•27, 2005 • Kate Aanenson: I believe that the only rub would be on the two apartment buildings. Right so, and it may be in how we interpret. Typically we take from the middle part of the pitch, so I'm not sure if Sharmeen looked at that. Richard Hennings: Well it does, yes you do take from the mid -point of the roof. But like I say, in the buildings because they're fairly wide and you want them wide rather than long and narrow, and therefore the roof gets high is the only reason I brought it up. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And maybe that is an issue that we look at with each individual design. Kate Aanenson: With the site plan. Mayor Furlong: Which might help Councilman Peterson's issue as well. Okay. Thank you. Any other questions? On the PUD at this point. If not, the applicant is here this evening. If there's anything that you'd like to say at this point on this matter. No? Okay. Thank you. This was a public hearing at the Planning Commission but if anybody else would like to provide comment to the council, I would certainly invite them up at this time as well. Seeing nobody. Bring it back to the council then for discussion or additional thoughts. Councilman Peterson, you were raising some questions earlier. Some thoughts on this or? Councilman Peterson: Yeah, I think it's a reasonable request and again speaking on behalf of myself, it's simply, I'm going to push hard to make it really architecturally interesting so the architectural design, I'm looking for something that's very distinctive and creative. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Other thoughts. On the PUD. Councilman Lundquist: I think it's reasonable. I like the, for this application using the PUD tool rather than other options available, so it allows us some more flexibility to do the things that Councilman Peterson was referring to. So it seems like the right thing to do. It's good access. On the highway and some of the other things that Kate talked about as well with the parking deck and some of those other things as well so I think it fits in, I feel like it fits in well, as well and I guess we'll just look for the, curious to see what the specifics will be when we get into the final design and those things. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Your thoughts Councilman Labatt. Councilman Labatt: No. I mean the issue with the sidewalks is a concern and that will be something I would wish the developer would look at is, the city would put one on the west side also. That behooves me why we wouldn't want one on each side for. Kate Aanenson: The problem is the decking of the bridge over the overpass of 212. The cost of that. Todd Gerhardt: To accommodate a trail along, over the top of 212, the bridge needs to be expanded by 10 to 12 feet. And that cost, MnDot will pick up the first trail widening on the bridge. The second one falls back as a responsibility onto the city and we opted out of that when 19 0 0 City Council Meeting — June 27, 2005 we looked at the 101, Powers and we're still working on the Bluff Creek one right now. But it's roughly about $250,000 for each pedestrian overpass, or widening of the sidewalk for each of the roads. Just for the bridge section. Mayor Furlong: Okay. I think you know the comments were made this evening with regard to the design standards that Councilman Peterson brought up. If I'm correct I think the standards that are quote in place, in addition to the new ones for medium density that we put in just this last year ... Highway 5 corridor standards that we've spread out across the city now and if memory serves that was back in the late 90's that that standard was put in place. '98299. Somewhere like that. And maybe as we sit here in 2005, it's time to look at those and maybe step them up a notch. I wouldn't be at all opposed to looking at that, as a kind of a review. As a way to look at that. Not just for this particular PUD but throughout. 212 is going to be a major corridor and it will be a view that many people that aren't residents of Chanhassen will see of our city as they drive through, and both from a commercial standpoint as well as landscaping requirements and such like that. At least maybe it's something that we should start talking about and say what do we want to do here. To the extent that we, at least under this PUD I guess it'd be something that I'd like to consider somehow to, since we're a couple years away from the development here, since it likely will tie with the completion of 212, I'd like to make sure that we have a way to incorporate, if we do decide as a council to modify, step up those, that those would be included as well in this and the other developments that we're talking about. So I don't know from a process standpoint how we do that. From a condition on this PUD, if we have to put something in there or, I mean it refers to ordinance I believe. It does as a condition, if I read it correctly in terms of materials and designs and such. Kate Aanenson: Correct. And as those are modified then they would follow that, and we can put that in there. The PUD would follow any modifications to the design standards. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Not necessarily assume that they'd be there, but let's look at it and if there are, let's make sure that this gets included, anything like that. Any other thoughts or comments on the PUD? If not, there's another item associated with this. We could either take them separately, which is consideration of a letter of support regarding a tax credit application or we could bring, we could vote on the PUD. Bring that up second. Is there a preference one way or the other? Councilman Lundquist: Do this one first. Mayor Furlong: Okay, that's fine. Why don't we go ahead and consider a motion then on item 7(a). Councilman Lundquist: Is that the one on page 8? I would move that the City Council approve Rezoning of property located in the northwest quadrant at the intersection of realigned Highway 101 and Lyman with the, from residential single family to planned unit development mixed use. With the design standards as printed in the staff report and modifications of the design standards. That the PUD follow any modifications of design standards between now and. Mayor Furlong: Say final approval. PON City Council Meeting — Ju•27, 2005 • Councilman Lundquist: Final approval. Mayor Furlong: Good, thank you. Any, is there a second to that motion? Councilman Labatt: Second. Mayor Furlong: Second Councilman Labatt. Any discussion on the motion? Seeing none we'll proceed with the vote. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilman Labatt seconded that the City Council approves rezoning the property located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of realigned Highway 101 and Lyman Boulevard with an approximate area of 24 acres from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use incorporating the following design standards: CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a MIXED USE PUD including a NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses • The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with meeting the daily needs of the neighborhood. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on these lots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Commercial and office uses shall be limited to the area located south of Highway 212. Residential uses shall be located north of Highway 212 and along the western portion of the southern half. • Small to medium-sized restaurant -not to exceed 8,000 square feet per building (no drive-thru windows) • Banks with a drive-in service window • Office • Day care • Neighborhood scale commercial up to 8,000 square feet per tenant • Convenience store with or without gas pumps 21 0 0 City Council Meeting — June 27, 2005 Specialty retail (Book Store, Jewelry, Sporting Goods Sale/Rental, Retail Sales, Retail Shops, Apparel Sales, etc.) Personal Services (an establishment or place of business primarily engaged in providing individual services generally related to personal needs, such as a Tailor Shop, Shoe Repair, Self -Service Laundry, Laundry Pick-up Station, Dry Cleaning, Dance Studios, etc). Residential High Density (8-16 units per net acre). The total number of units for the entire site may not exceed 150 units. C. Building Area • Commercial/Office — Not to exceed 75,000 square feet for the entire development • Maximum Commercial/Office lot usage is a Floor Area Ratio of 0.3 • Maximum office/commercial building area per tenant may not exceed 8,000 square feet • Maximum residential units may not exceed 150 units. d. Prohibited Ancillary Uses Drive-thru Windows except banks or pharmacies. Outdoor storage and display of merchandise e. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Boundary Building/ Parking Setbacks (feet) Lyman Boulevard 50/50 Highway 101 50/50 Highway 212 50/50 Northerly Project Property Line 50/20 Westerly Project Property Line 50/20 Internal Project property lines 0/0 Hard Surface Coverage -Residential 50% Commercial and Office Hard Surface Coverage 70% Maximum Commercial (Retail) Building/Structure Height I story Maximum Office BuildingtStructure Height 2 stories Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less f. Non Residential Building Materials and Design 22 City Council Meeting — June 7, 2005 • There shall not be underdeveloped backsides of buildings. All elevations shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article XXIH. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. g. Residential Standards Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article XXM. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 1. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 2. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick, stone, etc. 3. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. h. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights-of-way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. 1. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to, truck loading areas, trash storage, parking lots, Large unadorned building massing, etc. 2. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 3. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells shall be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. 4. Undulating berms, north of Lyman Boulevard, north and south of Highway 212 and west of Highway 101 shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. 6. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. 23 0 0 City Council Meeting — June 27, 2005 L Street Furnishings Benches, kiosks, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. j. Signage The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment and the business's ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet the city's goals: a. Establish standards which permit businesses a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise their name and service; b. Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination; c. Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; d. Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; e. Preserve and protect property values; f. Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; g. Limit temporary commercial signs and advertising displays which provide an opportunity for grand opening and occasional sales events while restricting signs which create continuous visual clutter and hazards at public right-of-way intersections. P. Proiect Identification Sim: One project identification sign for the commercial portion of the development located at the entrance off of Highway 101. Project identification signs shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. 24 City Council Meeting — R9 27, 2005 • j.2. Monument Sign: One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrance to the development off of Lake Susan Drive. One monument sign per lot shall be permitted for the commercial portion of the site. These signs shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five feet in height. These signs shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. j.3. Wall Signs: a. The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend greater than 20 feet above the ground. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, or translucent facing. b. Illuminated signs that can be viewed from neighborhoods outside the PUD site, are prohibited. c. Tenant signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant's proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 15% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. j.4. Festive Flags/Banners a. Flags and banners shall be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. b. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric or vinyl. c. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. d. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two feet. e. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. L Flags and banners which are torn or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. j.5. Building Directory a. In multi -tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. 25 0 0 City Council Meeting — June 27, 2005 j.6 Directional Signs a. On -premises signs shall not be larger than four (4) square feet. The maximum height of the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet from the ground. The placement of directional signs on the property shall be so located such that the sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties (including site lines or confusion of adjoining ingress or egress) or the general appearance of the site from public rights-of-way. No more than four (4) signs shall be allowed per lot. The city council may allow additional signs in situations where access is confusing or traffic safety could be jeopardized. b. Off -premises signs shall be allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately routed through residential streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. c. Bench signs are prohibited except at transit stops as authorized by the local transit authority. d. Signs and Graphics. Wherever possible, traffic control, directional and other public signs should be consolidated and grouped with other street fixtures and furnishings to reduce visual clutter and to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement. A system of directional signs should also be established to direct traffic within the commercial area and away from residential areas. j.7. Prohibited Sims: • Pylon signs are prohibited. • Back lit awnings are prohibited. • Window Signs are prohibited except for company logo/symbol and not the name. Such logo shall not exceed 10% of a window area • Menu Signs are prohibited. j.8. Siert Desi¢n and Permit Requirements: a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. c. Wall business signs shall comply with the city's sign ordinance for the Neighborhood business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the "street" front and primary parking lot front of each building. 26 0 0 City Council Meeting — June 27, 2005 k. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the development. High pressure sodium vapor lamps with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. 2. Light fixtures should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). Street light fixtures should accommodate vertical banners for use in identifying the commercial area. 3. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 4. Lighting for parking areas shall minimize the use of lights on pole standards in the parking area. Rather, emphasis should be placed on building lights and poles located in close proximity to buildings. Non Residential Parking 1. Parking shall be provided based on the shared use of parking areas whenever possible. Cross access easements and the joint use of parking facilities shall be protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. 2. The development shall be treated as an integrated shopping center and provide a minimum of one space per 200 square feet of commercial/retail area. The office/personal service component shall be treated as an integrated office building and provide 4.5 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 49,999 square feet, four per thousand square feet for the second 50,000 square feet, and 3.5 per thousand square feet thereafter. in. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Furlong: Next item on the agenda is related to the PUD that we just passed, is a request by the developer to consider a letter of support in their application for tax credit financing. Why don't we move to a staff report please Mr. Miller. Justin Miller: Sure. Mayor, council. The last work session we had the applicant approach you about providing a letter of support indicating what kinds of financial support the city is willing to provide. They are applying for tax credits and a level of assistance from the city would give them some additional points in that process. It's a highly competitive process that I think they told you about last week. We left that meeting and staff, or council gave staff some direction to check up on a few things. One of those being references. We did call representatives from other cities that the applicant has done projects in and they all came back very good. They spoke very 27 City Council Meeting — June 27, 2005 highly of the applicants. Said they worked well with staff. It was a high quality project and they were very flexible and met the requests of the councils and staff so we feel comfortable with those references. The applicant also provided a preliminary tax credit application scoring sheet on the points that they feel they would earn if there's city assistance and if there's not and I believe that that scoring tabulation is attached to the report. Then staff and the applicant went through several revisions on a letter that we feel like meets their needs in terms of securing points for their application, as well as giving the city some flexibility and not locking us into anything definite and so that letter's attached as well, and staff would recommend that you approve the letter as attached. Be glad to answer any questions. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for staff. Councilman Peterson: One of the questions I had was in the second to the last paragraph where we talk about flexibility and the zoning and development standards. I'm a little concerned with flexibility in the development standards, even though we discussed it's a PUD. But you know it seems to allude that we were going to lessen our standards to make this thing move ahead faster. That is a worrisome statement from my perspective. Todd Gerhardt: Kate, did you want to probably elaborate on what you meant by that statement. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, and actually what the PUD is, we transferred the density from the north to the south and that's the part of the flexibility. Just in the fact that we're creating a PUD as a zoning technique that gives them points. Creation of a PUD. Councilman Peterson: I understand that. I just didn't, I read it and then it just didn't, it sounded like we were willing to give up on our standards and that was just a concern. Again it's a minor point. Kate Aanenson: We didn't. I mean we even told them now that we want to see the project before we look at the roof lines so we haven't. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, I think their original letter had setbacks, parking and we eliminated those items from the letter. I think this one just dealt with the transfer of units. I wonder if we can just write that language in there. Councilman Peterson: Yeah, I don't want to word smith. I was just giving a reflection more than anything else. Kate Aanenson: I think we changed that. Mayor Furlong: That we did change it? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I think the way it's written now it reflects. Mayor Furlong: What we did. m • • City Council Meeting — June 27, 2005 Kate Aanenson: Yep. Mayor Furlong: Consistent with what we've done. What we just passed. Kate Aanenson: Correct, what you just passed. Mayor Furlong: A few minutes ago. Kate Aanenson: ... and that was the goal. Right as we understood. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Good. Any other questions? Of staff. If not, is there any discussion by the council? Or is there anyone else that would like to provide input to the council before we discuss too. I'd certainly invite public comment. If anybody would like to come forward. If not, that's fine. Okay. Discussion by the council. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, City Council members. I just want to make one point that the assistance that we're looking at here is very similar to, or exactly like the assistance that we provided to Presbyterian Homes. I just want to make that clear. We're following the same standards and guidelines that we used on that project. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Thoughts, discussion on this? Councilman Lundquist: Mr. Mayor, it's been one, I think we talked a little bit at our work session, one of the troubling points of it was kind of the speed at which it came along. I'm glad to see some of the things around the scoring and I probably still don't understand that process enough to understand it. 12 points is the make or break line, but I think regardless some of the concerns on this one, it's a, it provides a lot of opportunities. The location I feel like is a pretty good spot for this. Certainly this type of housing is not something that we have a lot of in the city. Sometimes that's good. Sometimes that bad. It tends to be a thing that I notice comes up a lot in some of our scores or some of the things that we're, the city is looked upon so certainly something that has kind of been on my radar to look at and explore options. We talked about a little bit of affordable housing. Potential when we did the bowling alley project a couple years ago. This one, the financial commitment for the city is fairly minimal as well, so I think that provides some benefits. The references, things are good and some of the things that I've heard about the developer and the owner/operator thing I think lend positive on this. I will still state for the record though that I'm not in favor of the financial assistance or some of those other things unless these tax credit issues come through. Without the tax credit thing I think as we spoke to the developers, the market's not going to be there for them to provide that service there anyway so certainly not open to giving assistance or other things like that to a market rate townhouse or apartment. That's just not something that I can support so I feel like that I'm still being rushed along a little bit. I understand the deadlines here. The wording in the letter seems pretty, pretty loose and seems like there's a lot of out's there so to speak so, but hopefully I guess I'm assuming that staff's gone over this with the developer and they feel like that serves their purpose. So I guess I'm still a little bit hesitant but comfortable with where we're at. It seems like there's enough space in this letter, if this thing doesn't happen, and certainly as we spoke on item 7(a), we're going to be, pay a lot of attention to this development as a whole. It will be a 29 City Council Meeting — Ju•27, 2005 • highly visible thing so we need to make sure that it just doesn't you know, become something that we regret how it happened. So that's my comments. Mayor Furlong: Good, thank you. Other comments. Councilman Peterson: Keying on what Councilman Lundquist just said, we don't want to regret. We certainly don't want to regret any of our decisions but we're talking about large building structures and developments. It's even more but I agree with the majority of what Councilman Lundquist statements were. However a couple of things that I differ on. We've compared Presbyterian Homes often tonight and in the last meeting and they are similar. But what happened in exclusive, not exclusively but essentially in the Presbyterian Homes development, or before we gave the tax support, we had seen that building design through it's infancy to it's ultimately was the final design, and we could see exactly what we were going to be giving tax credit for. In this situation we don't. So we could be signing up for something that we ultimately don't like, even though we've got a PUD. You just don't know what you're signing up for until you get it done, and that concerns me. That I really want to be able to see what the plan is before I say I'm going to support it with tax increment financing or any derivation of the same. So that's not happening in this situation so that's a big difference from what we saw in Presbyterian Homes. I can't see this. I can't feel it. And we don't often use this increment to make this thing happen and now I've got a situation where I don't really know what's going to go in there, and what kind of standards ultimately will be there. Because even within the PUD we've got flexibility. I don't want that to totally hang our hat on that. So I am concerned that I really don't know what it's going to look like. And ultimately I might say yes. This is a great idea. I want to support it. But that's, I would normally think that would come after the building plans are in front of us for approval. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Other comments? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Mr. Mayor, can I ask...? Mayor Furlong: Certainly. Absolutely. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Why don't we have anything in front of us to see what potentially could be there? Kate Aanenson: Well 101 has to be relocated. Again they're trying to tighten down the market. I think we're pretty close as far as what we know it's going to look like. Three stories. 47 units. 48 units. We've given them design and they've given us other prototypes of their building. It does have to go through a site plan review so no matter what, even if you chose to give it funding and you didn't want to approve the project, that's your stop gap. You say we're not going to approve the site plan, so ultimately you have the control. If it doesn't meet your PUD standards, or the modifications thereto, then you wouldn't approve it. Whether you've given them the affordable or not, but because they have to lock up those dollars at a future date, they have to go for those today to tie them up. That's kind of the sequence of timing of when the road will be relocated and I think that's what Brian was kind of... W City Council Meeting — Jun• , 2005 • Councilwoman Tjornhom: So then if I would vote for this and it does not fairly meet Mr. Peterson's ideas of what we should be developing, or what my idea should be developing, we do have an out? Kate Aanenson: Well I think our idea is to follow the PUD that we just put in place. Now, as you know there's different iterations within that PUD but if it meets that in whole, that's our guide plan or any modifications thereto. But clearly the goal was to give them some direction on what our expectations are. As far as design. And again those are the new standards with the brick. Some percentage of brick and those sort of things. So I think we're on the, or the staff believes anyway that we're on the same page as far as design issues. And again you have to approve the site plan. Based on the PUD. Councilman Peterson: But you can't not approve a site plan based upon the PUD if you follow the PUD standards, right? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: But I think we have some control or effect on those standards given the conditions in the PUD. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. That's what you just told me that you want me to look at those and make sure they're where they want them to be. Mayor Furlong: I mean we haven't seen it, I concur with that. I view this letter as much as a concept pian or similar to a concept plan that might come forward in a development phase. We did have some elevations and again concept in nature in the information that was provided by the developer at our work session at the last meeting so we did have some of that, and I included their concept in terms of 100% of these 48 units being affordable or lower cost cost kind of, and the types of units and such like that. So we haven't seen it from a site plan standpoint but I don't view this, I view this letter as support conditioned upon what we've seen so far. And if it comes back different, then our support may be different too. To that point, so other comments. Councilman Labatt: I don't disagree with anything. I think the last meeting we beat this around in the work session and I don't, I guess I agree with your comments Mayor about, if what comes to us in the fall, or whenever we may see it, is not what we expect, we still have options present at that time. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other comments? I guess to close up, from what I've seen economically on this and I think Councilman Lundquist alluded to it, is it's, there's a lot of things that have to fall into place for this to move forward and I think the, what the city can do here is be the catalyst. We did get a short timeframe. I don't think any of us appreciated that, but sometimes we try to react as quickly as we have to. And I commend staff for trying to work with the developer to put something together and I agree with Councilman Lundquist. This letter is a letter of support but there are conditions on it, and the conditions are that we give back what we're, from a concept standpoint, agreeing to. If that changes, if they don't get their tax credit financing, and they want to come back for a market rent unit, I don't think, there's not going to 31 City Council Meeting — June 7, 2005 • be support there. I wouldn't support that, but if we can be a catalyst to try to, as a city to help them attain something else, I think financially the city's commitment here is probably not going to make or break the project financially. We do have that condition in there as well. The but for condition that's obviously required. But I, in looking at the potential financial components, so say with the property tax, or the increment relative to the whole size of the project, it's probably not going to hinge just on that so I support it. I think these are opportunities and as part of our strategic initiatives that we as a council talked about earlier this year, we talked about housing and trying to bring that in and making sure we look for opportunities to do things. I agree with Councilman Lundquist that it is an opportunity here for us to do some things. It may not be perfect. There's work to do but that's what we always do when we start with concepts and go to the final and I think that we can support this and write this letter of support with the understanding that we're supporting what we've seen so far and that's what we're trying to do at this point. And hopefully again be the catalyst to see if we can't get some additional of these life cycle housing units in our city. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, City Council members, I'd just like to add a point to this is that you know history is a factor in this and the Sand Companies history has played out in other communities and they've been flexible in working with those communities and their reputation and the property that they've managed over the years and some of their techniques that they use is pretty creative. But I think the City of Chanhassen has also been working with the Sand Companies. I think they understand that. We've allowed the zoning for this and worked with them in the concept stage and looking at providing financial assistance so I think they understand that this is a partnership and for a successful partnership there's got to be give and take and I think we've given. It's now for them to come to the table and show us a product that we would be proud of on that comer. It's a gateway. That's the name of the development and that's what we would expect from them. Councilman Lundquist: Clarification. They have the developer's received letters of support already from the county and school district, is that right? Todd Gerhardt: I'd have them respond. I believe it was from a couple of religious organizations and a couple of businesses. Developer: And the County. Councilman Lundquist: And the County, okay. Todd Gerhardt: And the County. Mayor Furlong: Any other discussion? If not, is there a motion? Councilman Lundquist: Move approval. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Second. 32 0 0 City Council Meeting — June 27, 2005 Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion on the motion? Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approve the attached letter of support for the Sand Companies tax credit application with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. All voted in favor, except Councilman Peterson who opposed and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS: Mayor Furlong: Are there any presentations from council members this evening? One item I'd like to mention, and probably stealing Mr. Gerhardt's thunder or Mr. Hoffman, and that is the Music in the Park, the first event was a week ago last Thursday I believe, and was a really good start to what's going to be a great program. I can see us and viewing that as an opportunity to expand the number of events and I'm sure that's something we can fund through some sponsorships as well. Making use of that. Of that park as a gathering place and really as a place for people to come together and that's what it was. I had the chance to stop by and it's just walking up there and with music and walking around and saying hi to people that you haven't seen for maybe a week or two, or maybe over the winter time so it was a great event and commend the park and rec department for following through on that idea and something that we can build upon. Todd Gerhardt: Just add to that. We probably had approximately 100 people attend the event and the Mayor's proclamation on a sunny, beautiful day was right on the numbers right there too, so if you can duplicate that for the aro and 0, that'd be great. Mayor Furlong: Tell me where to sign. Todd Gerhardt: I don't have anything else to add tonight but like to continue our work session. Still had a couple items left on that to finish up. Mayor Furlong: And we will do that following adjournment of this meeting. Thank you. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. Councilman Lundquist: A question for staff. Maybe for Todd. Farmers market. How are we looking now that we're more into the summer and some of those things? How's the farmers market looking? Todd Hoffman: Can't tell. To be quite honest I've not been present so has anybody been down to the farmers market? Todd Gerhardt: I know they've only been open for about 2 weeks. They had a late start with the wet spring. So I believe it's been 2-3 weeks that they've been operational. I've seen the signs 33 CITY OF CIIANIIASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PC Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952227.1180 Fax: 952 227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning A Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax. 952.227.1110 Web Site wwwoi.chanhassen.mn.us 0 January 12, 2006 Mr. James Sand Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South 10th Avenue Waite Park, MN 56387 40 Re: Development Notification Sign Escrow Refund Sand Companies Concept PUD - Case No. 05-01 Dear Mr. Sand, Ds -01 Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $100 which represents a refund of the development notification sign escrow for the above -referenced project. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 952-227-1107 or by email at kmeuwissen@ci.chanhassen.nm.us. Kim T. Meuwissen Planning Secretary KTM:ms Enclosure SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. S Vendor: Sand Properties Inc Vendor No: SanPro Vendor Acct No: Invoice Number Date Description DW5686 01/06/2006 Re—turn-sign escrow CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD., P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952)227-1140 Pay: *** One hundred dollars and Zero cents 0 Check Date: Check Amount: 01/12/2006 $100.00 Invoice Amount 100.00 M&I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK 127998 n-nsreio Date Amount 01/12/2006 $100.00 To the order of: Sand Properties Inc ' II•1c79981I' 1:01100LIS?1: 00257-773i2Us CITY .OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN Payee: SAND PROPERTIES INC Date: 12/02/2004 Time: Receipt Number: DW / 5686 Clerk: DANIELLE CONCEPT PUD 05-01 ITEM REFERENCE ------------------------- DEVAP CONCEPT PUD 05-01 USE & VARIANCE SIGN RENT SIGN ESCROW Check AMOUNT 750.00 75.00 100.00 --------------- 925.00 925.00 --------------- 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! Check to Kim for mailing with letter. OK to return sign escrow. /11 E4 A 7 ,1fftA 9-11 Aii 1/ Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Date 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Bos 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.221.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park A Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning A Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 40 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, Executive Director • 05-01 FROM: Justin Miller, Assistant Executive Directo -,,,, DATE: December 2, 2005 oke . RE: Sand Companies Housing ProposalrE F Timeline BACKGROUND Earlier this year, the Sand Companies approached the City asking for support of their affordable housing tax credit application for their proposed 48 unit apartment building to be located at the intersection of new Highway 212 and 101. At that time, the City Council tentatively gave support towards this project, dependent on several factors. One of these factors was that the developer successfully acquire tax credits for the project. In October, the city received notice that the Sand Companies had in fact been awarded tax credits through the competitive process that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency awards. They are now looking to go through preliminary plat process (expected to be heard in January 2006) and to begin the Tax Increment Financing process. They would like to have their financing in place by this springtearly summer, and as such would need the TIF package to be finalized. When this proposal was initially brought before the City Council, staff recommended that TIF be used in the same manner as it was for the Presbyterian Homes project, where 90% of the increment generated would be returned to the developer for six years, with 50% being returned for another two years. Staff's initial analysis determined that this would amount to $316,800 (in today's dollars). A more detailed analysis will have to be done by our financial advisors, and this analysis will be presented to the EDA during the approval process. Attached is a draft timeline that staff and the developer are prepared to initiate. Staff is looking for confirmation that this is in fact the plan that the EDA had in mind and authority to begin the TIF process. Before any work begins, the developer will be required to submit a TIF application, as well as a $2000 fee and a $10,000 deposit that will be used for any fees the city incurs. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtowo, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Engineering Dear Multifamily Development: Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1170 The City of Chanhassen is a community made up of residents, businesses and Finance institutions sharing a common history of social, economic and political interests. Phone. Fax:955227.1110 One of the nm purposes of a community is to serve as a lace of residence for Fax: 952.227.1110 primary ary p rpo ty � P its citizens. Assuming this charge, offering a mix of life cycle housing Park & Recreation opportunities becomes a challenge for local governments. Phone: 952227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation center The City is committed to providing a variety of housing styles with housing 2310 Coulter Boulevard available for people of all income levels to meet the life cycle housing needs of Phone: 952.227.1400 Chanhassen residents and local businesses. While committed to providing life Fax: 952.227.1404 cycle housing, the City must overcome obstacles to their development. One of Planning & the most difficult impediments to providing one facet of life cycle housing and/or Natural Resources affordable housing is the high cost of land. Developers or housing providers must Phone: 952.227.1130 be partners in providing life cycle housing. Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works The proposed 48 unit development called Gateway Place is an excellent 1591 Park Road opportunity for the City of Chanhassen to meet a portion of our housing goals. Its PFax:952.227.13100 location is along new Highways 101 and 212 near shopping, jobs and public Fax: X2.227.1310 transportation. The location of Gateway Place meets the characteristics of Smart Senior Center Growth development. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 The City of Chanhassen proposes significant local financial assistance for this website project as part of its endorsement. If the project is selected for funding, the City www.uchanlassen.mn.us Council supports the use of tax increment financing g (TIF) for the project in a manner similar to other affordable housing projects the City has offered assistance in the past. The TIF structure for past projects has been 90% increment for the first five years and 50% increment for two additional years. As part of the tax increment financing, the project will need to meet the state guidelines for tax The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a Channing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. CITY OF June 27, 2005 CgANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 Administration St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Attention: Multifamily Underwriting Building Inspections RE: Housing Tax Credit Program & Super RFP. P F952.2277.1.119900 1:952.2a Fax: GATEWAY PLACE, CHANHASSEN. Engineering Dear Multifamily Development: Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1170 The City of Chanhassen is a community made up of residents, businesses and Finance institutions sharing a common history of social, economic and political interests. Phone. Fax:955227.1110 One of the nm purposes of a community is to serve as a lace of residence for Fax: 952.227.1110 primary ary p rpo ty � P its citizens. Assuming this charge, offering a mix of life cycle housing Park & Recreation opportunities becomes a challenge for local governments. Phone: 952227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation center The City is committed to providing a variety of housing styles with housing 2310 Coulter Boulevard available for people of all income levels to meet the life cycle housing needs of Phone: 952.227.1400 Chanhassen residents and local businesses. While committed to providing life Fax: 952.227.1404 cycle housing, the City must overcome obstacles to their development. One of Planning & the most difficult impediments to providing one facet of life cycle housing and/or Natural Resources affordable housing is the high cost of land. Developers or housing providers must Phone: 952.227.1130 be partners in providing life cycle housing. Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works The proposed 48 unit development called Gateway Place is an excellent 1591 Park Road opportunity for the City of Chanhassen to meet a portion of our housing goals. Its PFax:952.227.13100 location is along new Highways 101 and 212 near shopping, jobs and public Fax: X2.227.1310 transportation. The location of Gateway Place meets the characteristics of Smart Senior Center Growth development. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 The City of Chanhassen proposes significant local financial assistance for this website project as part of its endorsement. If the project is selected for funding, the City www.uchanlassen.mn.us Council supports the use of tax increment financing g (TIF) for the project in a manner similar to other affordable housing projects the City has offered assistance in the past. The TIF structure for past projects has been 90% increment for the first five years and 50% increment for two additional years. As part of the tax increment financing, the project will need to meet the state guidelines for tax The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a Channing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. • r� increment financing including the "but for' test. The City of Chanhassen will also require the project to stay affordable for a specified period of time. Besides the financial assistance, the City supports fast-track permitting and flexibility in zoning and development standards. To accomplish this, the City used a Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval process to allow for this flexibility. On June 7, 2005, the City Planning Commission recommended approval of the PUD for the project and at our June 27, 2005 Council meeting, we approved these plans. As has been previously stated, the City of Chanhassen is committed to the development and completion of work force or life cycle housing within the City. We ask that you participate with us to help meet our common goal of affordable housing in Chanhassen by funding this development. Sincerely Tom Furlong Mayor 0 0 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FOR THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN CHANHASSEN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.9 (a housing district) Draft as of November 18, 2005 February 3, 2006 Project information (property identification numbers and legal descriptions, detailed project description, maps, buttfor statement, fiscal impacts to public works and police and fire services, and list of sources and uses of funds) for drafting necessary documentation sent to Ehlers & Associates. February _, 2006 EDA requests that the City Council call for a public hearing on the proposed Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area and the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 9. February 13, 2006 City Council calls for public hearing on the proposed Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area and the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 9. February 15, 2006 Ehlers & Associates confirm with the City whether building permits have been issued on the property to be included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 9. February 24,2006* Project information submitted to the Carver County Board for review of county road impacts if necessary* (at least 45 days prior to public hearing). *The County Board, by law, has 45 days to review the TIF Plan to determine if any county roads will be impacted by the development. If the City staff believes that proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 9 will not require unplanned county road improvements, the TIF Plan will not be forwarded to the Carver County Board 45 days prior to the public hearing. Please be aware that the Carver County Board could claim that tax increment should be used for county roads, even after the public hearing. [Ehlers & Associates will fax and mail on February 23 or 24, 2006.1 February 28, 2006 Letter received by Carver County Commissioner giving notice of potential housing tax increment financing district (at least 30 days prior to publication of public hearing notice.) [Ehlers & Associates will fax and mail on February 24 or 27, 2006.) iEHLERS i . SCHEDULE OF EVENTS - PAGE 2 CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FOR THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN CHANHASSEN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.9 (a housing district) March 10, 2006 Fiscal/economic implications received by School Board Clerk and Carver County Auditor (at least 30 days prior to public hearing). [Ehlers & Associates will fax & mail on March 8 or 9, 2006.1 March 30, 2006 Date of publication of hearing notice and map (at least 10 days but not more than 30 days prior to hearing). [Chanhassen Villager publication deadline, March 23, 2006 — Ehlers & Associates or City of Chanhassen to submit notice and map to newspaper. If City chooses to submit notice and map to newspaper, Ehlers & Associates will provide language to the City by March 21, 2005.1 March 21, 2006 Planning Commission reviews the Plans. March 22, 2006 Ehlers & Associates conducts internal review of Plans. April _, 2006 EDA considers the Plans and adopts a resolution approving the Plans. April 10, 2006 City Council holds public hearing at 7:00 P.M. on a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 9 and passes resolution approving the Plans. [Ehlers & Associates will email Council packet information to the City by March 31, 2006.1 By April 30, 2006 Ehlers & Associates files Plans with the MN Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor, and requests certification of the TIF District with Carver County. 1 EHLERS CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on May 26, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Rezoning, Sand Companies, Inc. — Planning Case No. 05-01 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me thisoW^ day of 2005. Notary lic : = - arep _, u KIM T MEUIMSSEN Notary Publlo-Minnespta My Comm1W. ESV Jen 31, 2010 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, June 7, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for rezoning of property from Residential Single Proposal: Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. Planning File: 05-01 Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Property Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Boulevard and the Location: future realigned Highway 101. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project, During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 Comments: or e-mail saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerclaldndustdal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested pemon(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included in the report, please contact the Planning Stall person named on the notification. A9eggs gc�b°9e �i r`xi 2.6 H 37 oLi�`e �S9n��b"Poo mm "S �g'v5m i ��P �"�S�N MEp"n�°am�ay� vq��a�iOq�S gAs��gp g E c�i3 �� i�_t Public Hearing Area Notification Map Sand Companies, Inc. Rezoning NW Corner Lyman Blvd. & Realigned Highway 101 City of Chanhassen Lake Susan tii 1; Ri Me k m ^I m, 1 0 a ' AQO Q ��%—— �Ma mMICP 1G) Lyn�mM CP1 i I I I ,e la N � s I i i I ' 1`\ Lake Riley .g ® Subject Property Public Hearing Notification Area CHRISTOPHER T & AIMEE J ADAMS RICHARD C & SUSAN M AMBERSON MICHAEL B & CATHERINE 8690 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8549 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S ANDERSON CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8709 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT F & KAREN L ANDERSON 8561 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG R & GERALDINE BARETTE 8695 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TERRY LEE & MARI T BERANAK 8576 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ALAN COSENTINO & SHERRI BEIER 8572 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES A CURRY 6105 EDEN PRAIRIE RD #17 EDINA MN 55436 PATRICK A & LAURENE FARRELL 801 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS P HAGMAN & SUSAN M BARTENETTI 625 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DANIEL M & MELISSA L HERZOG 8790 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG A & MICHELLE D ALINE 8705 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 R STEVEN & MAURA BARNETT 8709 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES & SARA BORNES 8715 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EDWARD S & NANCY J COUGHLIN 587 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES A CURRY 6105 EDEN PRAIRIE RD #17 EDINA MN 55436 JASON J GILBERTSON & KATJAJEANNERET 583 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HUSSAM HASSOUN 8537 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER & DEBORA K HOL 8687 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RUSSELL G BAHENSKY 8552 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WILLIAM E BENSON 8596 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOSHUA E & CORA L CONKLIN 8990 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER & ANGELA CROOK 8702 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NORMAN & JACQUELINE ENGEL 8699 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG D GUTSCHOW & BARBARA J CLAYTON 8691 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGORY J & SUSAN L HENKEL 8699 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TROY & JENNIFER HOLASEK 8556 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RONALD G & JOYCE L HORR BRIAN W & KRISTIN A HOULE BENJAMIN R K &DONNA M JOHNSON 8513 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 880 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8521 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SHANNON G & MICHELLE A KERN LAWRENCE C &ELIZABETH KLEIN AL & M J KLINGELHUTZ TRUST 607 SUMMERFIELD DR 545 LAKE DR #219 C/O ALOYSIUS & M J KLINGELHUTZ CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK S & TRACY L KURVERS 8560 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DENNIS H & RUTH L LAUFENBURGER 8673 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC W LORENTZSON & TIFFANY L LORENTZSON 591 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SO VAN LY & SUSAN YKUN UNG 8509 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CYNTHIA ANN MILLER 891 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LISA K MOORE 8682 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC S & JULIE A OYEN 615 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PHOULITHAT PHANDANOUVONG & VATSANA PHANDANOUVONG 8529 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & STACEY G LAKOSKY 8533 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KHANH & KHIEM LE 631 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 ROBERT B MARTINOVICH & PATRICIA A MARTINOVICH 8592 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREG ALLAN MILLER 8801 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL W & ANA E MORENO 603 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVE J & MARY A PANENO 8564 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY A & MICHELLE M REITAN 8900 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANTHONY LARSON & LINDSAY NELSON 8545 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HARLAN C LEOPOLD 8553 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID S & JANICE A LUNDQUIST 8705 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL G & KAREN L MCNEIL 8695 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TIMOTHY S & TAMARA S MILLER 579 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CRAIG L & PATRICIA A MULLEN 611 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SEONGWOO PARK & MIN JEONG HAN 8580 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL & MELISSA ROHRMOSER 8698 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RAYMOND J ROOB JR & PAUL C SCHNETTLER & CHAE SUK ROOB THOMAS A & GRETA K ROSE KATE D WARD SCHNETTLER 8584 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8541 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 599 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SCH AMY J TE ETAL KEITH E & LISA L SCHWEGLER MARK & KRISTINA SCHWENDINGER 8990QUINN R RD 619 SUMMERFIELD DR 8708 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N PO BOX 668 8 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DONALD T SINNIGER & MICHELE M ABEL 600 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JUDSON E & JILL C SNELL 8694 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CURTIS A & SUSAN M SPERLING 8525 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TODD S & LORI E STRAND 8557 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEPHEN C & JUDITH A SLACK 8675 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES JONATHON SOMMERS & KAREN D ROGGE 8683 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SPRINGFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSN 7100 MADISON AVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 BRUCE A & SHEILA M TANQUIST 8569 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP INC UTPAL R VAIDYA & ATTN: TAX DEPT M/S 624 LEENA UTPAL VAIDYA PO BOX 7028 861 LAKE SUSAN DR BEDMINSTER NJ 07921 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRYAN J & LISA C VAN NINGEN 8686 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 FRANK T & MARY LOU W HALEY 851 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMI D WALKER 8517 CHANHASSEN HLLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID M SMITH & PATRICE N LUNDGREN-SMITH 8568 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & JODI L SOTEBEER 8565 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STATE OF MINNESOTA -DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD MAI LSTOP 631 ST PAUL MN 55155 ABBA J TREGOBOV & SUSANA P MACHADO-TREGOBOV 8714 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN H & RUTH M VANCE 8588 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CORY M & PAMELA S WATKINS 595 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JIM CURRY INVESTMENT COMPANIES 4817 Upper Terrace Edin. M 55435 612/927-9351.%rr� April 17, 1991 City of Chanhassen Attention: Paul Krause, City Planner 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Paul: Eugene Quinn asked me to buy 100 trees that he would plant and maintain in the 100 -foot SCLbaek alung itis LU(litsteiid 111 —Ilailllassell. T us is pari tit i11G iu erSG:;tiai7 arta for highways #212 and #101. I was fully aware I was not required to do this, but I decided to try to make Gene happy anyway. At a public meeting, Ursula called this "exemplary cooperation with neighbors." So be it. I talked to you, Paul, and you said if a plat were in for approval now, the existing city ordinance would require 6 -foot trees. We also noted that nothing will be built in the intersection before 1995 -- if everything is on schedule. Then I talked to Planning Commission member, Tim Erhart, who owns a tree farm in Chanhassen. Tim recommended Tom Wolcyn, a wholesale tree dealer in Cambridge, Minnesota. I called Mr. Wolcyn and have bought and paid for 100 trees that will be 6 feet tall by 1995. See his letter, the bill and a copy of my check. Gene Quinn talked to Mr. Wolcyn also and is satisfied with the trees that will be delivered to his home Friday, April 19, 1991. So Gene is happy with his 100 trees and I am happy to have this matter behind me. Let's all remember this when intersection planning and platting begins during the 1990's. Greetings to you, Paul, and to all who will be given copies of this letter and enclosures! Sincerely, Jim Curry Enclosures *JIM CURRY INVESTMENT COMPANY 4817 UPPER TERRACE EDINA, MN 55435 PAY r TO THE ORDER OF If\ IM Norwest Bank Blowningron, NA MMMMM 7M Narxff Amva BWtB 010." IBANRB Bb InBrM MN B f Maus MM\MM I CHECK NO. DATE 11'00094611'® 1:09 LO 166051: 9 L-0 Lill 38Slim 946 75-1850/910 AMOUNT I In inn /to IfA 0 &T -PIA oy\� owe ,P �v, - /�'C �`o Q •u 10 MN 1. A M O U N T DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT £ OESCwBEO BELGW. TME PTTCC... C -a" OI '7-1 JIM CURRY INVESTMENT COMPANY iE MOT .....cT w�ese �o+.w 1s wwoMwrLv.Ms�o wscE�wr ocsweo. DELUXE FORM NWC-3 V-2 DATE D ESC RI PTI O N I In inn /to IfA 0 &T -PIA oy\� owe ,P �v, - /�'C �`o Q •u 10 MN 1. A M O U N T W®lcyn Tree Farms and Nursery Rural Route 2 Cambridge, Minnesota 55008 612/689-3346 Metro - 370-1511 April 8, 1991 Dear ivic ijuinn, Our company specializes in growing evergreen trees, in the Cambridge area. We have over 800 acres in production. We will be supplying a mixture of evergreen trees for Jim Curry to be planted. These trees will be 3-4 feet tall and should grow to be 6' trees by the fall of 1995. Naturally they do not grow at exactly the same rate, some will be larger than others. But, the average size should easily exceed 6 feet in height. We will be arranging delivery to you with Mr. Curry. Sincerely, r Tom Woicy- TW:mr Member: Minnesota Christmas Tree Growers Association Wisconsin Christmas Tree Producers Association National Christmas Tree Association Minnesota Nursery & Landscape Association Wolcyn Tree FarmsL and Nursery Rural Route 2 Cambridge, Minnesota 55008 6121689-3366 Metro -370-1511 FAX 612/370-1511 r0 �UUd�J0� 004938 9 a-7 -93 s/ _. .E SH ?PcD SHIPPED VIAL' F.R ,v F,O.B,�POINT „)-w:vv+l..-.n.e,:vva ZMSW;w3',;�q ;J E -O. TY. SHIPPED `' DESCRIPTION lb -01— I ORIGINAL b-o1— ORIGINAL mutt:a��a.aml.�wma,..eaarw�em.:rucianascm `� 0w �.. June 15, 1990 Honorable Mayor, City Council and Planning Commission City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Enclosed is a copy of a petition that I hand -carried to City Hall last July doubt if any of you saw it. We own ten acres just east of the referenced parcel of land shown on the attached maps. We purchased the property in 1977. The primary route for Highway 212 at that time was the South Lake Riley route. I attended a City Council meeting about 1980 and remember Mayor Hobbs stating that the City had no preference as to the north or south alignment. It was within six months after that meeting that I read in the local paper that the City had officially adopted the north route. No one around here was notified that the issue was being discussed by the City. After that we received many notices of public hearings for the Highway 212 project. I went to numerous meetings on the subject of 212. After realizing that I was not going to change the road alignment, the next major issue at these hearings was the land use around us. The enclosed land use maps were from a 212 public hearing in 1987 and were presented by the City planner from Chanhassen. They showed the parcel of land just to the west of us as medium density. In July, 1989, we received a notice of a public hearing for the Highway 101 alignment which showed the same parcel of land as commercial. Why the change? The Highway 101 alignment south of 212 is the same as that shown at the 1987 public hearing. It upsets me that the City planners do not have any more consideration for us citizens that live here and call Chanhassen home. What right do they have to allow commercial development right next to our homes? What does the City owe Jim Curry? He came to Chanhassen for only one reason - to make a buck. As commercial property he could surely sell the land by the square foot and make a fortune, but what does it do to our property value? I realize that sometime in the future I will have to subdivide the land that the freeway doesn't take. I will have some nice wooded lots but who wants to build a home next to a commercial business. Last winter, I stopped at the Eden Prairie City Hall to compare the land use plan at the Highway 212 County Road 4 interchange. They did not have their plan done at that time but I was told that no commercial zoning was being planned at the interchange. June 15, 1990 Chanhassen City Council Page 2 ... I recently attended the joint city council meeting with HUD. One of the interesting items that was discussed was how the City treated the old, established businesses when the downtown area was redeveloped. We need you council and planning commission members to watch out for our rights. I often feel the City staff gets "overwhelmed" by the developers. Have a freeway ramp in my back yard is more than enough impact. I ask that you support our request. nk Y ou Gene R. Quinn 532 Lyman Boulevard Enclosures GQ/erw ;hway Plans w/Site Layout North Site Location Realigned Highway 101 Nen- Highway 212 Proposed Lighted Intersection Future Southwest Metro Transit Station South Site Location Lyman Boulevard & Highway 101 Interchang. V aye G�Q'6 GI Mandatory EIS Category Exemption aaaMEN Mixed Residential and Industrial -Commercial Projects 4410.4300, subp. 32 If a p,ojea includes bah residential and industrial -cc imeroal c naponents, the pm)eu must have an EAW prepared if the sum of the quotient obtained by dividing the number of residential units by the applicable rtndential threshold of subp. 19, plus the quotient obtained by dividing the mount of industrial commercial gross floor space by the applicable mdustrad-cm mesal threshold of subp. 14, equals or exceeds one. (local) 4410A400, subp. 21 Mono If a project includes both residential and industnalmmnmeraal components, the project must have an EIS prepared if the sum of the quotient obtained by dividing the number of residential units by the applicable residential threshold of subp. 14, plus the quotient obtained by dividing the amount of industnal commercial gross floor space by the applicable industrialcormnercial threshold of subp. 11, equals or exceeds one. (Local) E now The threshold, of this category are based on arithmetic computations involving the thresholds of the commerciallvmdusirial categories and the residential categories. This can be expressed as a formula as: S = AIB + OD, where A = number of residential units B = residential unit threshold C = commerciallvmdusanal grass floor space D = eommerciallind atrial threshold If S equals or exceeds 1.0, review is mandatory. Expressed ar a series of steps the need (or review is detembted as follows.' Step I - Divide the number of residential units by the residential threshold which applies. If there are both attached and unattached units, perfoomn this step twice and add both quaients into the fvmol rum. ll - Step 2 - Divide the amount of commerciaVidusirial gross floor space by the applicable com ercialivdusirial threshold. [)� m • I ife,� Step 3 - Add the quotients obmvvd in steps I and 2. LA5 0 % O " Step 4 - Compare the sum obtavmed in step 3 to 1.0. If the sum equals or exceeds 1.0, review is mandatory. Hoe is an example which dlustrates how to apply this category: Assume there is a mixed project of 250 apartments and 200,000 square feet of office and retail to be built in a second class city; the city has adopted a comprehensive plan meeting the requirements listed in the EQB rules and the project is consistent with that plan. is review required? Step 1 - Divide 250 units by 375 units, the attached residential threshold for a city with a comprehensive plan where the project is consistent: 150875 = 0.67. Step 2 - Divide 200,000 square feet by 307,000 square feet, the commerclallindustrlal threshold for a second class city: 200,0001300,000 = 0.67. Step 3 - Add the quotients: 0.67 + 0.67 = 134. Step 4 - Compare the sum to 1 D: 134 exceeds 1.0, so therefore an EAW is required for this project. 4410.4300, subp. 33 Construction of a communications tower equal to or in excess of 500 feet in height. (Local) x- 111111 7 S 03 Communications Towers None None ace�'J� /4o W 5 k6 Lkat -4- J 3'� S SNIT w+5 ,G June 7, 2005 2005 OFFICERS TO: Sharmeen Al-Jaff Chair FROM: Linda Walton, Executive Director Mark Bentrup RE: Agenda Item No. 2/Highway 312 Corridor Development Edina Real Estate Services Chair -Elect I am forwarding a written statement from the Government Action Bill Traxler committee of the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce which we Community Bank Chanhassen would appreciate your presenting to the Planning Commission this Vice Chair evening. Mary Kay Rasmussen The Chanhassen Bank As a summary of the group's thought, I would like to pass on a quote from an e-mail from one of the Committee members as fol - Secretary lows: Damen Cornell Alliant Mortgage Treasurer Sandy Olson Westwood Community Church MEMBERS AT LARGE Vernelle Clayton Lotus Realty Services Mark Halla The Mustard Seed Mark Sass Sass Construction Anne VanEpern Ridgeview Chanhassen Clinic PAST CHAIR James Haugen World State Mortgage CITY LIAISON Corey Hoen EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Linda Walton "I think the substance of our message needs to focus on making sure that whatever is actually developed along the 312 corridor is limited by effective planning. Would putting gas stations, restau- rants or coffee shops undermine our Downtown? I don't think so. However, if whatever approval is given tonight would allow for a drug store, hardware store, office supply store etc., that surely would create a pull from Downtown.' We have lots of scheduling conflicts tonight, but we are still hope- ful that one of our members will be able to attend the Public Hear- ing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. 391 West 78th Street • PO Box 1099 • Chanhassen • Minnesota 55317-1099 •952.934.3903 • fax: 952.934.2129 • email: info@chanhassenchambecorg The Chanhassen Chamber's Government Action Committee has spent the past several years focusing on the value of an expanded tad base, anticipating that there would be pressures brought to bear from proposals for the use of the land adjacent to new Highway 312. Recognizing that housing would be one pressure point and retail another, the committee has consistently proposed office parks with some neighborhood retail/service. The rationale has been that office parks (as distinguished from office warehouselbusiness parks) bring significantly more tax revenue than does housing, while minimizing increased burdens for additional government services. Secondly, while the office segment of the real estate industry is slow now, business owners tend to want to locate their businesses near their residences and there are many business owners living in and near Chanhassen. Further, we reasoned that office use would enhance, rather than detract from the significant investment in Downtown retail. The reasoning for advocating neighborhood retail stems from support of the long- standing City policy of planning to provide convenience retail to its residents at various strategic locations throughout the City as it develops. However, the Government Action Committee now has two concerns which it is bringing to your attention: 1. We believe the description of uses permitted within neighborhood retail is inconsistent with the intent in its permission of the use "Shopping Center." 2. The Chamber's recent survey of businesses within Chanhassen resulted in large percentage of the respondents listing the preservation of the viability of downtown as a primary concern. The city, both the taxpayers and the businesses, have made a major investment in creating a Downtown which is the envy of many less creative cities. Elsewhere, thought the country there are examples of retail development strung along highly visible transportation corridors and the resulting decaying of Downtown sectors. We in Chanhassen need to avoid the carrot of increasing tax base in one area only to cause a decrease in property values in another. One of the ways to avoid this result and still permit some commercial development along our corridors is (in addition to limiting sizes) to refine the uses permitted within the Neighborhood Business category to those uses which can succeed by relying on the neighborhood, not by permitting those who need traffic from the City and/or region at large os-ol 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Request for a rezoning of property from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use located on the northwest intersection of the future alignment of Highways 101 and Lyman Blvd. — Planning Case No.05-01 Application of Sand Companies, Inc. On June 7, 2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Sand Companies, Inc. for Planned Unit Development property from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Residential Single Family. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Mixed Use. 3. The description of the property is: the area bounded by Lyman Boulevard to the south, future realigned Highway 101 to the east, existing Highway 101 to the west, and residential neighborhood to the north. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 0 0 The planning report #05-01 dated June 7, 2005, prepared by Sharmin Al-Jaff, et al is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 7`h day of June, 2005. CHANHASSEN�PLANNNCO� SSION BY: i�l�e A-` Its Chairman gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-01 sand companies concept pud-xzoning\mzoning\tindings of fact.doc 0 0 os-o� CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 13, 2005 Mayor Furlong called the work session to order at 5:35 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Peterson, Councilman Labatt, and Councilman Lundquist COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilwoman Tjomhom STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Justin Miller, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman, and Greg Sticha SAND COMPANY HOUSING DISCUSSION. Justin Miller reviewed the staff report and gave a power point presentation showing the location and layout of the project. Sand Companies Inc. is asking the city for their support in providing TIF for this project. Jamie Thielen, President and Jim Sand with the Sand Companies Inc. explained why they liked this site for tax credit possibility from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (Ml -IFA) 2005 Housing Tax Credit Program. Sand Companies Inc. is looking for the level of interest from the City Council on providing TIF for this site and submitting a letter of intent. Todd Gerhardt asked for clarification on what SCI meant by letter of intent. Jamie Thielen provided examples from other cities of what's included in similar letters of intent. Justin Miller asked Mr. Thielen to explain how the tax credits work. Todd Gerhardt asked if the applicant has explored reducing the size of units to lower the rental cost, and if they will meet the State's "but for" clause. Mr. Thielen stated he was comfortable that they could meet the "but for" analysis. Councilman Peterson asked the applicant to explain the rationale in choosing to build apartments versus townhomes and ownership versus rental, stating his preference for ownership versus rents. Mr. Thielen explained that Sand Companies Inc. does rental housing and own and manage their properties long term. Councilman Peterson asked Mr. Thielen to explain what feedback they got at the neighborhood meeting. Mayor Furlong asked about their experience with turnover in similar projects in other cities. Councilman Lundquist asked what would happen if Sand Companies Inc. did not receive the tax credit. Mr. Thielen explained the units would be market rate and not affordable at that point. Councilman Labatt asked for clarification of the point system on the MHFA application and how the City providing TIF will affect the total points. Todd Gerhardt asked about income restrictions and amenities involved with the project. Mayor Furlong asked for feedback from council members. Councilman Lundquist stated he would support the request if the affordable piece was included. Councilman Labatt stated he would support the request but would like to see more information on the point system. Councilman Peterson stated concern with being pushed to make a decision without enough information so could not support the request at this time. Mayor Furlong stated he could support the request but would like additional information over the next 2 weeks. Councilman Peterson challenged staff to get architectural interest with the building design. Mayor Furlong invited council members to direct any questions to Justin Miller. Mr. Thielen stated again he was looking for the general consensus from the council. Mayor Furlong asked that they continue City Council Work SessionJune 13, 2005 • to work with Justin Miller and staff over the next 2 weeks and would see the item at their next meeting. SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT. Bonnie Carlson, Administrative Services Director reviewed the proposed changes to the joint powers agreement. Mayor Furlong felt it was a fair and reasonable formula. Councilman Peterson explained that Eden Prairie and Chaska have already approved the agreement. The City Council had consensus for approval of the agreement. CONSIDER PROPOSALS FROM THE CHANHASSEN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION FOR: A. DONATE AND INSTALL SCOREBOARDS. B. AMENDED PROPOSAL FOR ADVERTISING SIGNS ON BALL PARK FENCES. Todd Neils, Vice President of the Chanhassen Athletic Association Little League provided background information on the program and it's projected growth. Todd Hoffman presented information from staff's perspective. Mayor Furlong asked if Mr. Neils had provided the additional information requested by staff. Mr. Neils stated the manufacturer did not provide information on the manual scoreboards being requested. Todd Hoffman stated his concern was with long term maintenance of the scoreboards but at a cost of $900, the scoreboards can be tom down if they become unsightly or not functional. Councilman Lundquist expressed concern with gawdy signage and what happens if the program fails. Councilman Peterson stated he would support the scoreboards, but was not in favor of the signage request stating he would prefer to see the city fund the needed improvements. Mr. Neils stated the revenue generated from the signs is for capital improvements, i.e. dugouts, scoreboards, lighting, etc. rather than asking the city for money. Todd Gerhardt asked if the Chanhassen Athletic Association has looked at charging a fee to participants for maintenance and improvements. Mayor Furlong expressed concern with the expectations this was setting up for future city councils and the affect on contributions to the city from the business community. Councilman Labatt explained how the arena fund program works with the Chaska Hockey Association and how that could work with the Chanhassen Athletic Association. Mayor Furlong asked that there be more discussion on this item. Todd Gerhardt stated staff would bring back additional information at a future work session. The work session was recessed at 7:00 p.m.. It was reconvened at 8:25 p.m.. Greg Sticha reviewed the staff report which outlined the time line for approvals, a snapshot of the 2005 budget versus actual revenues and expenditures in the city's general fund, debt service needs and Key Financial Strategies general fund revenue and expense projection worksheet for 2004 through 2010. Staff stated they were looking for feedback from the council regarding the 2 .1 :, .. '0 CITY OF CHMNSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227 1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone. 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www achanhassen.mn.us • MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager • OS -01 FROM: Justin Miller, Assistant City ManagerdL DATE: June 22, 2005 RE: Sand Companies Letter of Support BACKGROUND 76 Representatives from the Sand Companies have approached the City about providing assistance for their proposed apartment project near the intersection of new Highway 212 and relocated Highway 101. During the June 130' work session discussion, council asked staff and the applicant to provide more information, which is presented below: References Staff has contacted several of the communities where the Sand Companies have completed projects and they all had nothing but complimentary things to say about them. In each case, the cities stated that they built high quality projects and were very responsive to staff and council requests. Preliminary Tax Credit Scoring Tabulation As requested, the applicants completed a preliminary scoring tabulation for their Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Tax Credit Application. As you can see from their attached letter and application, with city assistance they will receive a score of 99 and without it a score of 87. It is difficult to tell exactly how these scores will rank them in the application process, but the applicant states that a project with city assistance will be looked upon more favorably than one without it. Draft letter Attached is a draft letter that would be included as part of the application if the council chooses. Staff has worked with the applicants on the wording, and both believe that it is sufficient. In the letter there is language stating that the tax increment financing district process would still need to be completed and appropriate financial requirements must be met before any financial assistance would be provided. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached letter of support for the Sand Companies tax credit application with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Building Inspections RE: Housing Tax Credit Program & Super RFP. PFax:9552227190 GATEWAY PLACE, CHANHASSEN. Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Dear Multifamily Development: Phone: 952.227 1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 The City of Chanhassen is a community made up of residents, businesses and Finance institutions sharing a common history of social, economic and political interests. Phone: 952.227.1140 One of the primary purposes of a community is to serve as a place of residence for Fax: 952.227.1110 its citizens. Assuming this charge, offering a mix of life cycle housing Park & Recreation opportunities becomes a challenge for local governments. Phone: 952227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 The City is committed to providing a variety of housing styles with housing AeltCenter Coulter 2310 Coulter Boulevard available for people of all income levels to meet the life cycle housing needs of er Phone: 952.227.1400 Chanhassen residents and local businesses. While committed to providing life Fax: 952.227.1404 cycle housing, the City must overcome obstacles to their development. One of Planning d the most difficult impediments to providing one facet of life cycle housing and/or Natural Resources affordable housing is the high cost of land. Developers or housing providers must Phone: 952.227, 1130 be partners in providing life cycle housing. Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works The proposed 48 unit development called Gateway Place is an excellent 1591 Park Road opportunity for the City of Chanhassen to meet a portion of our housing goals. Its Phone: 952.227.1300 location is along new Highways 101 and 212 near shopping, jobs and public Fax: 952.227.1310 transportation. The location of Gateway Place meets the characteristics of Smart Senior center Growth development. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 The City of Chanhassen proposes significant local financial assistance for this Web site project as part of its endorsement. If the project is selected for funding, the City www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Council supports the use of tax increment financing (TIF) for the project in a manner similar to other affordable housing projects the City has offered assistance in the past. The TIF structure for past projects has been 90% increment for the first five years and 50% increment for two additional years. As part of the tax increment financing, the project will need to meet the state guidelines for tax The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. MY l OF June 27, 2005 CgANgASSEN 77190 Market Boulevard PBoz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Y 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 Administration St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 P5211 Fax: 952.227.1110 Attention: Multifamily Underwriting Building Inspections RE: Housing Tax Credit Program & Super RFP. PFax:9552227190 GATEWAY PLACE, CHANHASSEN. Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Dear Multifamily Development: Phone: 952.227 1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 The City of Chanhassen is a community made up of residents, businesses and Finance institutions sharing a common history of social, economic and political interests. Phone: 952.227.1140 One of the primary purposes of a community is to serve as a place of residence for Fax: 952.227.1110 its citizens. Assuming this charge, offering a mix of life cycle housing Park & Recreation opportunities becomes a challenge for local governments. Phone: 952227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 The City is committed to providing a variety of housing styles with housing AeltCenter Coulter 2310 Coulter Boulevard available for people of all income levels to meet the life cycle housing needs of er Phone: 952.227.1400 Chanhassen residents and local businesses. While committed to providing life Fax: 952.227.1404 cycle housing, the City must overcome obstacles to their development. One of Planning d the most difficult impediments to providing one facet of life cycle housing and/or Natural Resources affordable housing is the high cost of land. Developers or housing providers must Phone: 952.227, 1130 be partners in providing life cycle housing. Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works The proposed 48 unit development called Gateway Place is an excellent 1591 Park Road opportunity for the City of Chanhassen to meet a portion of our housing goals. Its Phone: 952.227.1300 location is along new Highways 101 and 212 near shopping, jobs and public Fax: 952.227.1310 transportation. The location of Gateway Place meets the characteristics of Smart Senior center Growth development. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 The City of Chanhassen proposes significant local financial assistance for this Web site project as part of its endorsement. If the project is selected for funding, the City www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Council supports the use of tax increment financing (TIF) for the project in a manner similar to other affordable housing projects the City has offered assistance in the past. The TIF structure for past projects has been 90% increment for the first five years and 50% increment for two additional years. As part of the tax increment financing, the project will need to meet the state guidelines for tax The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. 0 0 increment financing including the "but for' test. The City of Chanhassen will also require the project to stay affordable for a specified period of time. Besides the financial assistance, the City supports fast-track permitting and flexibility in zoning and development standards. To accomplish this, the City used a Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval process to allow for this flexibility. On June 7, 2005, the City Planning Commission recommended approval of the PUD for the project and at our June 27, 2005 Council meeting, we approved these plans. As has been previously stated, the City of Chanhassen is committed to the development and completion of work force or life cycle housing within the City. We ask that you participate with us to help meet our common goal of affordable housing in Chanhassen by funding this development. Sincerely, Tom Furlong Mayor . . •*•sCl Saind CwWanles,Kr 366 South Tenth Avenue, PO Box 727 June 15, 2005 Waite Park, Minnesota 56387-0727 Telephone (320) 202-3100 Sent Via E-Mail Fax (320) 202-3139 www.SandCompanies.com City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 RE: Gateway Place — Chanhassen. Dear Honorable Mayor & Council Members: Thank you for the opportunity to present our development to you at your workshop on June 1P. We know you had a very busy agenda and we greatly appreciate the opportunity on short notice. As requested, we have completed a preliminary scoring sheet for Gateway Place based on what additional points may be awarded based on the City's participation. As was mentioned, the competition for tax credits is very competitive and every points weighs heavily. As you will see in the attached score sheet, with the City assistance the project preliminarily scores "99" while without the assistance the project scores "87". This is a very significant difference. Besides just points, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency will select a project that has local support over one that does not. With our significant past experience, we are confident with the City's assistance of TIF and the flexibility in development standards, the project will be very competitive. Without it, we feel the project has very little chance of being selected. We will be in attendance at your Council meeting on June 27`s, but if you have any questions in the mean time my contact information is below. Thanks again for your support and we look forward to completing a successful development with you. Office Telephone (320) 202-3100 Mobile Telephone (320) 267-3922 E -Mail JJThelen@SandCompanies.com Sincerely, Jamie zlXlen Jamie J. Thelen President Development ♦ Architecture ♦ Construction ♦ Property Management Equal Opportunity Employer MINAOTA HOUSING FINANCE ANCY 2006 HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM SELF -SCORING WORKSHEET FOR SELECTION POINTS Development Name: Gateway Place Address: xxx Lake Susan Drive City: Chanhassen To be eligible for selection considerations of MHFA administered tax credits from the State's volume can under the MHFA Oualified Allocation Plan, a developer must demonstrate that the project is eligible for not less than 30 points Please indicate below the selection and/or preference priority points expected for your development. Where multiple points per section are available please check the appropriate box (0) for points claimed. The MHFA will determine actual selection points used, based on the application and additional documentation you have submitted to justify the points claimed. (Attach separate details sheet). Please Note: If submitting an electronic version of the application, you most also submit a signed original paper Self -Scoring Worksheet for Selection Points (HTC Form 10) with your application package. The scores reflected on both submissions most be identical. You must also be sure both sheets identically reflect all supporting detail information as called for on the sheets. Only the signed original Self - Scoring Worksheet for Selection Points that accompanies the application will be reviewed and considered as the controlling document. Do not claim points unless documentation is provided along with the application to justify the points claimed. Please Note: Deed Restricted Covenants covering the rent restrictions and occupancy requirements presented at selection will be placed on the building(s) at the time of allocation. ROUND I. — MINIMUM THRESHOLD REQUIREMENTS For applications submitted in Round 1 all applicants statewide must meet one of the following threshold types. If you are applying to Round 1, please indicate the Threshold item you meet a. In the Metropolitan Area: 1. ® New construction or substantial rehabilitation in which, for the term of the extended use period (tens of the Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants), at least 75 percent of the total tax credit units are single room occupancy units which are affordable to households whose income does not exceed 30 percent of the area median income. 2. ❑ New Construction or substantial rehabilitation family housing projects that are not restricted to persons 55 years old or older in which, for the term of the extended use period (term of the Declaration of land Use Restrictive Covenants), at least 75 percent of the total tax credit units contain two or more bedrooms and at least one-third of the 75 percent contain three or more bedrooms; or 3. ❑ Substantial rehabilitation projects in neighborhoods targeted by the city for revitalization. b. Outside the Metropolitan Area: 1. ❑ Projects which meet a locally identified housing need and which are in short supply in the local housing market as evidenced by credible data such as local council resolution submitted with the application. (For Threshold Letter — Sample Format, see HTC Procedural Manual, Reference Materials Index.) a Projects that we not restricted to persons of a particular age group and in which, for the term of the extended use period (term of the Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants), a percentage of the units are set aside and rented to persons: 1. ❑ with a serious and persistent mental illness as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 245.462, Subdivision 20, paragraph (c); 2. ❑ with a developmental disability as defined in United States Code, Title 42, Section 6001, paragraph (5), as amended; 3. ❑ who have been assessed as drug dependent persons as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 254A.02, Subdivision 5, and are receiving or will receive care and treatment services provided by an approved treatment program as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 254A.02, Subdivision 2; 4. ❑ with a brain injury as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 256B.093, Subdivision 4, paragraph (a); or 5. ❑ with permanent physical disabilities that substantially limit major life activities, if at least 50 percent of the units in the project are accessible as provided under Minnesota Rules chapter. 1340; d. ❑ Projects, whether or not restricted to persons of a particular age group, which preserve existing subsidized housing, if the use of tax credits is necessary to (1) prevent conversion to market rate use or (2) to remedy physical deterioration of the project which would result in loss of existing federal subsidies; or e. ❑ Projects financed by Rural Development, which meet statewide distribution goals. Minnesota Mousing Finance Agency 1 a IS (HTC Form 10) MMR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self -Scoring Worksheet .-1 Priorities Developer led a Awarded waddSeletion 1. Large Family Housing 10 Points pis. w/o City .Assistance The proposal is for a project that provides family bowing that is not restricted to persons 55 years old or older. At least 75 percent of the total tax credit units must contain two or more bedrooms. The tenant 10 10 selection plan must give preference to families with minor children. To receive these points, the project must meet HTC Design Standards including the design requirements for Large Family Housing. Compliance must be evidenced by, a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect. Note: If points are claimed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the selection priority categories of Single Room Occupancy Housing or Special Populations. 2. Single Room Occupancy Housing 10 Points At least 50% of the total tax credit units must be one bedroom or less with rents affordable to households hose incomes do not exceed 30 percent of AMI. Scores based on gross rent level including utilities 0 0 before rental assistance. Eligible units must have rents affordable to households whose incomes do not exceed 30 percent of median income without rental assistance. To receive these points, the project must meet the HTC Design Standards and be evidenced by a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect. Note: If points are claimed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the selection priority categories of Large Family Housing or Special Populations. 3. Strategically Targeted Resources 10 To 12 Points ❑ The proposal is for the rehabilitation of an existing structure 10 points Ip 10 Note that for all HTC Rehabilitation proposals: the amount of rehabilitation must exceeds: (a) $5,000 per low-income unit for the project; and the greater of (b) $3,000 qualified basis per low-income unit per building; or (c) 10 percent of the adjusted basis. A qualified preservation project that receives full points for "Preserved Federally Assisted Low Income Housing" may qualify if rehabilitation exceeds the greater of (b) or (c) above. Calculation is based on rehabilitation hard costs and cannot include intermediary costs or soft costs identified in the application; plans and/or scope of work provided at time of application. ❑ The rehabilitation proposal is part of a community revitalization or stabilization plan. 2 additional points Must be evidenced by a letter from the city verifying that the proposed project is part of an approved community revitalization area as established by resolution or other legal action. -OR- The proposal is for new construction and will utilize existing sewer and water lines without substantial extensions. 10 Points To receive these points, the project must meet the HTC Design Standards and be evidenced by a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 2 of 15 (HTC Farm 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self -Scoring Worksheet An Selection Priorities qW Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 4. Special Populations 3 or 10 Points Pisw.to ttiw Projects that are not restricted to persons of a particular age group and in which, for the term of the Assistance extended use period (Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants), a percentage of the units are set 0 0 aside and rented to persons with the following disabilities: a) a serious and persistent mental illness as defined in Minn. Stat. § 245.462, subdivision 20, paragraph (c); a developmental disability as defined in United States Code, Title 42, Section 6001, paragraph (5), as amended; (c) assessed as drug dependent as defined in Minn. Stat § 254A.02, subdivision 5, and are receiving or will receive care and treatment services provided by an approved treatment program as defined in Minn. Stat. § 254A.02, Subdivision 2. d) a brain injury as defined in Minn. Stat § 256B.093, Subdivision 4, paragraph (a); or (e) permanent physical disabilities that substantially limit major life activities, if at least 50 percent of the units in the project are accessible as provided under Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1340. ❑ A project in which at least 50 percent of the total units are set aside and rented to such persons: /0 points R- ❑ A project in which at least 15 percent ojthe total units are set aside and rented to such persons 3 points If a proposal sets aside a percentage of units for persons with disabilities, the applicant most contact the human services department for the county where the project will be located to discuss the proposal. The applicant must obtain a letter from the human services department indicating that its staff has reviewed the proposed project, and stating whether there is a need for such housing and if the project would be eligible for funds to assist with the social service needs of the residents. In addition, if the project will be delivering supportive services to residents in these units, the proposal must include documentation describing: the scope of services residents will require, specific services the project will offer, whether the applicant will be responsible for delivery or will partner with identified rganizations (and if so the status of those arrangements and partners' credentials), specific sources that will fond the services and their commitment stains, and how residents will be connected to the services. To receive these points, the project must meet the HTC Design Standards and be evidenced by a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect. Note: If points are claimed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the selection priority categories of Large Family Housing or Single Room Occupancy Housing 5. Economic Integration 2 Points Two (2) Points will be awarded for the election of 25-50 percent of units affordable to households with rents at or below 60 percent of the area median income to the total units (not including full-time manager 0 0 r model units) in the project: — The corresponding HTC applicable fraction will be based on the number of HTC low income units to total and will be enforced at the time the Carryover Allocation and IRS Form 8609 are prepared to determine iffie maximum tax credit allocation for the project. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 3 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self-Sconng Worksheet Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 6. Cooperatively Developed Plan 5 or 10 Points Pis. e/o Cily .Assistance City comprehensive plans alone do not qualify for the options below. Ip 10 ❑ The proposal is created in accordance with a comprehensive cooperatively developed plan that encompasses housing plus services and/or economic related initiatives. - 10 points Eligible plans include: • Saint Paul - Ramsey County Five -Year Low Income Housing and Homeless Services Plan; • Minneapolis Hennepin County Homeless Plan r other plans that include housing plus services and/or economic development initiatives -OR- ® The proposal is created in accordance with a cooperatively developed plan, which incorporates housing initiatives. - 5 points At a minimum, any combination of the above most have the input of the following entities: • City or county (or instrumentality thereof) OR • Regional Unit of Government AND one or more of the following: • Neighborhood and/or community group • Housing provider • Funders 7. Project Location 5 or 10 Points The proposed housing is needed to increase or sustain the supply of affordable housing in counties that experience both job and population growth during the last ten years. 10 10 ® The proposed housing is located in one of the top ten job or population growth -10 points ❑ The proposed housing is located in one of the top twenty, but not in the top ten, job or population growth counties — 5 points (See Reference Materials Index — Project Location —for a list of cities) 8. Cost Avoidance / Cost Reduction 1 to 10 Points One or more of the following: (One point for each box checked, with a maximum of 10 points) 8 0 ❑ Land donation of the development site ® Monetary/in-kind work and material donations ❑ Donation or waiver of development specific assessments or infrastructure costs ® Density bonus ® Reduced setbacks ❑ Reduced parking requirements ® Decreased road widths Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 0 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self -Scoring Worksheet n Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded (Selection Priority 8. continued) ® Flexibility in site development standards ® Flexibility in zoning code requirements tis. who cin ❑ reductions Assistance ® Fast-track permitting and approval ® Innovative building techniques or materials Provide specific cost savings amounts and details to justify points claimed If land donation of the development site, monetary/in-kind work and materials donations, or onation/waiver of development specific assessments or infrastructure costs are claimed for points in this section, it cannot also be claimed in the selection points category of Local Contributions. Assistance from the MHFA Super RFP and related Funding Partners i.e. Family Housing Fund, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentive Accoant, IS NOT eligible for inclusion in this section To receive these points, documentation of the terms and conditions of a cost avoidancelcost reduction measure most be provided from the contributor of the assistance or authorized local official, at e time of the application. The documentation shall be in the form of a development specific letter of intent, city or council resolution, letter of approval, statement of agreement or eligibility, or memorandum f understanding. If the documentation provided contains words synonymous with "consider" or "may", as in "may award") regarding the cost avoidancelcost reduction measure, the points will not be awarded. Documentation from an engineer, architect or certified contractor or provider for innovative wilding techniques or materials must be submitted at the time of application and be reviewed and proved by the Agency to be eligible for the points. The applicant must provide accurate, complete and credible evidence of the amount of cost savings for each cost avoidance/cost reduction measure and record the savings in Section VII E. of the MF Application Form. The value of the donations and in—kind contributions must be consistent with current market comparable costs for land, materials and services 9. Local Contributions 2 to 10 Points ® The proposal is receiving funds from an area employer. — 4 points. ]0 6 ®� The proposal is receiving funds from the local municipality. — 4 points Funds from local municipalities may include, for example: • Tax increment financing • Reservation land not subject to local property taxes • Historic tax credits • Monetary grants • Tax abatement • Land donation of the development site ® The proposal receives funds from a private philanthropic group, religious organization, or charitable organization. - 2 points Provide specific details to justify points claimed If land donation of the development site, monetary/in-kind work and material donations, or donation/waiver of development specific assessments or infrastructure costs is claimed for points in this section, it cannot also be claimed in the selection points category of Cost Avoidance/Cost Reduction. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 5 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Sea -Scoring WoMsheet r Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded (Selection Priority 9. continued) To qualify for points using historic credits and tax abatement, there must be satisfactory documentation that the resource will provide additional positive investment capital to the development that PM 11n> Cay will reduce the demands on the state and federal housing resources. For tax increment financing to qualify .assistance for points, there must be satisfactory documentation that the resource is committed to the development at e time of application. Documentation of the amount and the terms of assistance must be provided by the provider of e assistance at the time of application in the form of a development specific letter of intent. The value of e donations must be consistent with current market comparable costs for materials and services. Within 6 months of the date of selection (MHFA Board selection date) the applicant must provide the MHFA with documentation of a firm commitment, authorization or approval of the local contribution(s). The documentation must state the amount, terms and conditions and be executed or approved at a minimum by e contributor. Documentation containing words synonymous with "consider" or "may", (as in "may award") regarding the contribution, will not be considered acceptable. Lack of acceptable documentation will result in the reevaluation and adjustment of the tax credits or RFP award, up to and including the total recapture of tax credits or RFP funds. 10. Leverage 2 t 10 Points oints we awarded for leveraging requested state deferred funding with funding from private, federal, 10 local government, religious, philanthropic, or charitable organizations. The formula used to determine the 10 Leverage Ratio Percentage is based upon the cumulative state deferred finding award (including current request) for MHFA RFP funds• divided by Total Development Cost. *(including past and present MHFA and Funding Partners [i.e. Family Housing Fund, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentive Account] awards and current requests) and excluding First Mortgage, Syndication, HOME, MARIF funds). Total state RFP/Funding Partner Funds awarded and current request $960.000 divided by Total Development Cost $6,240.000 equals Leverage Ratio 16%. ® 0-20%= ]Opts ❑ 21-300/6 = 8 pts ❑ 31-40%=6pts ❑ 41-50%=4pts ❑ 51-60%=2pts ❑ 61 and above = 0 pts Documentation of the amount and the terms of assistance must be provided from the provider of the assistance at the time of application in the form of a development specific letter of intent Within 6 months of the date of selection (MHFA Board selection date), the applicant must provide the MHFA with documentation of a firm commitment for each fording source. The documentation must state the amount, terms and conditions and be executed or approved by the lender or contributor and the applicant. Documentation containing words synonymous with "consider" or "may", (as in "may award") regarding the commitment will not be considered acceptable. Lack of acceptable documentation will result in the reevaluation and adjustment of the tax credits or RFP award, up to and including the total recapture of tax credits or RFP funds. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 6 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self -Scoring Worksheet a a Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 11. Readiness to Proceed 2 to 10 Points pis. *10 City Assistance The MHFA shall award points to applicants who have secured funding commitments for funding for one or more funding sources at the time of application (commitments for funding from MHFA and Funding 0 0 Partners (i.e. Family Housing Fund, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentive Account) are only included if obtained in a previous funding cycle/round). The documentation must state the amount, terms and conditions and be executed or approved by the lender or contributor and the applicant. Documentation containing words synonymous with "consider" or "may", as in "may award") regarding the commitment will not be considered acceptable. Excludes current funding round requests for Syndication Proceeds and First Mortgage Financing) Total eligible funding secured, awarded or committed $316.800 Divided by Total Development Cost $6.240.000 equals Percentage of Foods Committed 5%. ❑ 60% or more of funding seemed, awarded or committed 10 points ❑ 30a/o to 59.9% of funding secured, awarded or committed 6 points ❑ 10% to 29.9% of funding secured awarded or committed 2 point ® 9.9% and below of funding secured, awarded or committed 0 points 12. Intermediary Costs (Soft Costs) 1 to 6 Points Points will be given to projects with the lowest intermediary costs on a sliding scale based on percentage f total development costs. For HTC selected projects, this percentage will be enforced at issuance of the 6 6 IRS Form 8609. *(In 2004 Total Mortgageable Costs were in effect) Intermediary cost amount $873.600 divided by Total Development* Costs $6,240.000 Equals Intermediary Percentage 14% ® 0.0-15% 6 points ❑ 15.1-20% 3 points ❑ 20.1-25% 2 points ❑ 25.1-30% 1 point ❑ 30.1% & over 0 points 13. Unacceptable Practices -10 to -25 Points MHFA will impose penalty points for unacceptable practices as identified in Section W.F. of the Housing 0 0 Tax Credit Procedural Manual. 14. Eventual Tenant Ownership 1 Point The proposal incorporates a financially viable plan to transfer 100 percent of the HTC unit ownership at e end of the 15 -year compliance period from the initial ownership entity (or MHFA approved "Transfer 0 0 f Ownership") of the project (the Limited Partnership) to tenant ownership. The unit purchase price at time of sale must be affordable to incomes meeting HTC eligibility requirements. To be eligible, the buyer must have an HTC qualifying income at the time of initial occupancy (HTC rental tenant) or time of purchase. The plan must incorporate a Limited Partnership ownership exit strategy and the provision of services including home ownership education and training. The Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants will contain provisions ensuring compliance with hese home ownership program commitments by the Limited Partnership Owner. (Refer also to Section V. W. of the HTC Procedural Manual for additional information.) Until the time the HTC units are purchased by a qualified tenant or in the event the HTC units are not acquired by a qualified tenant, the owner will extend the duration of low-income use for the full extended use period (30 years). The owner therefore, agrees to waive provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)[i)(H) and 42(h)(6)(F) and extends the duration of law -income use of the project to a minimum of 30 years. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 7 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self -Scoring Worksheet n a Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 15. Underserved Populations 3 to 10 Points p1,. ';ocm The development serves an underserved population as defined by the Agency as Single Female head of household with minor children, Individuals and Households of Color and one of the following is true: 10 Assistance 10 ❑ Marketing efforts or project design features will be used that will attract underserved populations (as defiled by the Agency) including collaborations and partnerships proposed with members or organizations addressing the needs of underserved populations? 3 points OR ® Marketing efforts or project design features will be used that will attract underserved populations (as defined by the Agency) including collaborations and partnerships proposed with members or organizations addressing the needs of underserved populations; and the applicant has past successful experiences in marketing to or working with underserved populations? ® 1 Underserved Population = 5 points ® 2 Underserved Population= 10 points (NOTE: see selection priority #4 for Disabled Individuals) 16. Temporary Priority 3 Points The proposal addresses a temporary housing priority and is eligible for the award of points by the 0 0 Commissioner or the Board of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency pursuant to authority cited in the Permanent Rules of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. 17. Preservation of Existing Housing Tax Credit Units 10 Points MPORTANT NOTE: 0 0 THESE POINTS ARE AVAILABLE ONLY TO EXISTING MHFA TAX CREDIT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR TAX CREDITS FROM MHFA'S COMPE'T'ITIVE ALLOCATION PROCESS (CONSOLIDATED RFP) and QUALIFIED TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR A PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM MHFA AS THE CREDIT ALLOCATOR To obtain the related points, the existing tax credit housing must meet the following criteria: 1. The development received an MHFA allocation of housing tax credits either prior to 1990 or is Iigible to and will exercise their option under the provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)(i)(11) and 42(h)(6XF) thin the next 12 months; and 2. Applicant agrees to maintain the Housing Tax Credit Units in the development for at least 30 years; and 3. The proposal will not result in the displacement of existing low and moderate income residents; and 4. Units must be considered at risk of going to market rents, where the market rents of comparable units exceed the tax credit rent limits by 10 percent and the proposed rents will increase by more than 30 perces 'thin two years of the Housing Tax Credit Application date. The risk of conversion must be supported y information contained in the application and with final determinations made by MHFA; or 5. Tax credit units would no longer remain decent, safe, and affordable due to physical deterioration or deterioration of capacity of current ownership/management entity. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency sof 15 (HTC Forts 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self -Scoring Worksheet Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 18. Permanent Housing for Individuals Experiencing Long Term Homelessness (5 to 110 Points) Rs. w/o City Assistance MHFA Competitive Round, Non -Tax Exempt Points ("bonus- points) 100 Points 0 0 MHFA Competitive Round or Tax Exempt Points ("non -Bonus" points) 5 or 10 Points MPORTANT NOTE: THE 100 "BONUS- POINTS ARE AVAILABLE ONLY TO QUALIFIED PERMANENT HOUSING PROJECTS TARGETING INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCING LONG TERM HOMELESSNESS APPLYING FOR TAX CREDITS FROM MHFA'S COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION PROCESS (CONSOLIDATED RFP) QUALIFIED TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR A PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM MHFA AS THE CREDIT ALLOCATOR WELL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM AWARD OF 10 POINTS ("NON -BONUS" POINTS) FROM THIS POINT CATEGORY. QUALIFING PROPOSALS MUST CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF 4 UNITS SERVING HOMELESS HOUSEHOLDS. A proposal which is awarded scoring points from this category and is selected to receive tax credits will be required to comply with the Lone Tern Homelessness reporting requirements as defined by the MHFA. The Tax Credit Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants. including a specific Rider to the Declaration, will contain performance requirements related to these Long Term Homelessness units and will be recorded with the property. The 100 points ("bonus pointel will be available until a total of $1,452,000' (estimated 25 percent MHFA authority) in tax credits are awarded for qualifying proposals for Persons Experiencing Long Term Homelessness selected in the 2006 Housing Tax Credit competitions. Once this maximum amount is reached, the 100 points (`bonus" points) will no longer be awarded to qualified proposals for the remaining 2006 Tax Credit Program competitive funding round. Qualified proposals may earn a maximum of 10 points ("non -bonus" points cited below) and may continue to compete in the appropriate set aside. The MHFA will promote housing for households experiencing long -tern homelessness by giving reference points to proposals that meet all the following conditions: a) sets aside a percentage of housing tax credit units to (minimum 4 units) serve households experiencing long-term homelessness as proposed to be defined in Minnesota Rule, Chapter 4900.3705; b) addresses an unmet need and fits with the Continuum of Care goals and action steps intended to address homelessness as identified in the Exhibit 1 Plan Housing Gaps Analysis and described in the Continuum of Care Narrative submitted to HUD; c) provides an acceptable plan for resident support services (i.e. information and referral, advocacy, case management, self-reliance training, resident association and community building activities) contingent upon an agreement with an established organization providing such services to residents and financial plans demonstrating feasibility; d) provides a service budget which supports the plan; e) provides an executed memorandum of understanding between the owner, lead service provider and property management which outlines the duties and responsibilities of each, and; f) the applicant agrees to pursue and continue renewal of rental assistance, operating subsidy, or service funding contracts for as long w the funding is available. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 9 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit program 2006 Self -Scoring Worksheet Selection Priorities W Developer Claimed MHFA Awarded (Selection Priority 18. continued) Additional points ("non -bonus" points) will be awarded to a proposal in which a certain percentage Points are not Points we not (rounded up to the next full unit) of the total units are set aside and rented to household experiencing To be eligible for selection considerations of MHFA administered tax credits under the MHFA awarded for this item. PIs. w/o City long term homelessness: Qualified Allocation Plan, one of the minimum requirements is that a proposal maintain Section 42 income and rental restrictions for a period of 30 years be inning with the first day of the compliance Assistance 5% to 10%, but no fewer than 4 units = 5 points. 42(h)(6)(F) and extend the duration of low-income use of the proiect The owner agrees that the provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)(i)(H) and 42(h)(6)(F) (which provision 50 % to 100%, but no fewer than 20 units = 10 points. would permit the owner to terminate the restrictions under this agreement at the end of the compliance To receive points under this category, an applicant is required to complete and submit with the period in the event the MHFA does not present the owner with a qualified contract for the acquisition of application materials, the Narratives, Forms and Submissions outlined in Part F of the Supportive the project) do not apply to the project, and that the Section 42 income and rental restrictions shall apply Housing Section of the Housing Resource Application Guide and Checklist. Materials include, but not for the period of 30 years beginning with the first day of the compliance period in which the building is limited to, a plan outlining the services to be provided, a budget to support the plan, and such other a part of a qualified low income housing project. The primary financing proposed most meet MHFA's items as are required by the MHFA for applications serving persons experiencing long-term underwriting standards or demonstrate to the sole satisfaction of the MHFA that the project can remain homelessness. financially feasible for the entire 30 -year duration of low income use. The MHFA recognizes that rental assistance, or operating subsidies, and supportive services may be necessary to effectively serve households experiencing Long-term homelessness. In the event that necessary rental assistance, operating support or tenant service funding is withdrawn or terminated due to reasons not attributable to the actions or inactions of the owner and alternative funding is unavailable, the owner may petition MHFA, in writing, for the termination or modification of the requirement that the assisted units be occupied by households Experiencing Long -Term Homelessness. MHFA will consider the petition and may relax or eliminate the requirement for Supportive Services or may eliminate the requirement that the assisted units be occupied by Households Experiencing Long -Term Homelessness. A development that is in full compliance with all the terms of the funding may be permitted to phase out the targeting of tax credit units to persons experiencing Long-term homelessness and convert the rents to the 50% tax credit rent limit without jeopardizing the tax credit allocation. The 50% tax credit rent limit for these units must be maintained for the remainder of the tax credit compliance period and extended use period to retain the tax credit allocation. 19. High Speed Internet Access 1 Point The development will provide High Speed Internet access via installation of all appropriate cable and 1 1 connections to every unit in the development. This will be a design requirement if points we taken. Preference Priorities Developer Claimed MHFA Awarded 1. Extended Duration (New for 2006) All proposals must maintain the duration of low-income use for a minimum of 30 Years Points are not Points we not To be eligible for selection considerations of MHFA administered tax credits under the MHFA awarded for this item. awarded for this item. Qualified Allocation Plan, one of the minimum requirements is that a proposal maintain Section 42 income and rental restrictions for a period of 30 years be inning with the first day of the compliance period in which the building is a part of a qualified low-income housing inniec[ Points are no longer awarded to projects where the owner agrees to waive provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)(i)(11) and 42(h)(6)(F) and extend the duration of low-income use of the proiect The owner agrees that the provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)(i)(H) and 42(h)(6)(F) (which provision would permit the owner to terminate the restrictions under this agreement at the end of the compliance period in the event the MHFA does not present the owner with a qualified contract for the acquisition of the project) do not apply to the project, and that the Section 42 income and rental restrictions shall apply for the period of 30 years beginning with the first day of the compliance period in which the building is a part of a qualified low income housing project. The primary financing proposed most meet MHFA's underwriting standards or demonstrate to the sole satisfaction of the MHFA that the project can remain financially feasible for the entire 30 -year duration of low income use. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to of 15 (HTC Fonn 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Gedit Program 2006 Self-Sconng Worksheet Preference Priorities - Developer Claimed MHPA Awarded 2. Serves Lowest Income Tenants/Rent Reduction 5 to 13 Points Piz, wb City. Assistance Scores based on gross rent level including utilities before rental assistance. Eligible units must have rents affordable to households whose incomes do not exceed 30 percent or 50 percent of median income without 10 rental assistance. 10 In addition to the elected income limit of 50 percent or 60 percent AMI for the full tern of the declaration (refer to the Minimum Set Aside), the applicant agrees to maintain deeper rent structuring for which selection points are requested. Units Representing _percent of the HTC units will have additional rent restrictions requiring rents affordable to households at 30 percent AMI (Rent Restrictions 30 percent) 81.Jnits Representing 1009percent of the HTC units will have additional rent restrictions requiring rents affordable to households at 50 percent AMI (Rent Restrictions 50 percent) Applicants may choose either option 1 or 2, and at your choice, option 3 for the development. This selection will restrict rents only (tenant incomes will not be restricted to the 50 percent or 30 percent income level by claiming points in this section). ® Option 1- A project in which 100 percent of the HTC unit rents are at the county 50 percent HUD area median rent limit (10 points) ❑ Option 2 - A project in which at least 50 percent of the HTC unit rents are at the county 50 percent HUD area median rent limit. (5 points) OR ❑ Option 3 - In addition to Option I & 2, a project that further restricts 30 percent of the above Restricted units to the county 30 percent HUD area median rent limit. (additional 3 points) NOTE: If points are claimed / awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed / awarded from the selection priority category of Rental Assistance for the same units. MPORTANT: All 50 percent rent restricted units most meet the 50 percent area median rent for a minimum of five years. After the first five year period has expired rent may be increased to the 60 percent rent limit over a three year period with increases not to exceed the amount listed in the table below All 30 percent rent restricted units must meet the 30 percent area median rent for a minimum of five years. After the first five-year period has expired rent may be increased to the 40 percent rent limit over a three-year period with increases not to exceed the amount listed in the table below. Year Rent Levels Rent Levels 1-5 300/6 of 50% 30% of 300% 6 30% of 53% 30% of 33% 7 30% of 57% 30% of 37% 8 30% of 60% 300% of 40% HFA will incorporate these restrictions into the project's Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants. The applicant must demonstrate to sole satisfaction of MWA that the project can achieve these reduced rents and remain a financially feasible project, IRC 42(m)(2). Points we contingent upon financial plans demonstrating feasibility, positive cash Flow on a 15 -year pro forma and gaining MHF management approval (for management, operational expenses, and cash Flow assumptions). Minnesota Housing Finance Agency I I of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Forrn 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self -Scoring Worksheet Preference Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 3. Preservation of Federally Assisted Units PIs. ./oCity Assistance (Non -Tax Exempt, MHFA Credit Ceiling, Competitive Round Projects) 10 Points (Tax Exempt, Non-MHFA Credit Ceiling, Non-competitive Round Projects) 10 Points 0 0 MPORTANT NOTE: THESE POINTS ARE AVAILABLE ONLY TO QUALIFYING NON -TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR TAX CREDITS FROM MHFA'S COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION PROCESS (CONSOLIDATED RFP) and QUALIFIED TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR A PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM MHFA AS THE CREDIT ALLOCATOR- (Provide specific details to justify points claimed) DEFINITION - Any housing receiving project based rental assistance, operating subsidies, or mortgage interest reduction payments. The universe includes public housing, Section 236 and Section 22l(d)(3) interest reduction payments, and any development with a project based Section 8, rent supplement, or ental assistance payments contract Preserves federally assisted low income housing which, due to mortgage prepayments or expiring rental assistance, would convert to market rate use or due to physical deterioration or deterioration of capacity of current ownership/management entity would lose its federal subsidies. MHFA, at its sale discretion, must agree that a market exists for a conversion to market rate housing. In order to obtain the related points, the federally assisted housing must meet the following criteria: 1 Units must be considered at risk of losing assistance within two years of the Housing Tax Credit pplication date as supported by information contained in the application and with final determinations made by MHFA. Applicant must agree to continue renewals of existing project based housing subsidy payment contract for as long as the assistance is available. 3 Applicant must agree to maintain the Housing Tax Credit Units in the development for at least 30 ears. Except for "good cause", applicant must not evict existing subsidized residents and must continue t renew leases for those residents. 4. QCT/Community Revitalization 1 Point point is awarded to projects that are located in a Qualified Census Tract (See Qualified Census Tract — O Reference Materials Index) and are part of a concerted plan that provides for community revitalization. 0 This must be evidenced by a letter from the city; verifying that the proposed project is part of an approved community revitalization area as established by resolution or other legal action. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 12 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Sea -Scoring Worksheet Preference Priorities Developer Claimed MHFA Awarded 5. Rental Assistance 4 to 18 Points Pls. w/o City Assistance Priority is given to an owner that has entered into negotiations with a Local Housing Authority to receive Project Based Rental Assistance. The assisted units must be located in buildings on the project site. For 4 4 he purpose of this section, if a proposal contains existing Project Based Assisted units, these units will be counted towards meeting required Rental Assistance percentages. ent for assisted units must be at or below FMRs (or appropriate payment standard for the project area). eceiving these points and agreeing to a minimum number of assisted units does not release owners from heir obligations under the Minnesota Human Rights Act and Section 42 prohibiting refusal to lease to the older of a voucher or certificate of eligibility under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 )ecause of the status of the prospective tenant as such a holder. current request for MHFA HTF Rental Assistance will not receive rental assistance points. A past ward or existing HTF Rental Assistance will be counted toward meeting required the Rental Assistance ercentages. Indicate the applicable combinations of the below components. Points for A and B cannot be la med in combination. ❑ (A) For developments agreeing to set aside at least 20 percent of the total units for project based rental assistance — 10 points. ❑ (B) For developments agreeing to set aside at least 10 percent but under 20 percent of the total units for the project based rental assistance — 6 points. ❑ (C) For selected components A or B above, if, in addition, the above commitments are coupled with a commitment from the HRA to provided the project based assistance for a minimum 10 year contract term. — 4 points. ® (D) For developments that cooperatively develop a housing plan to provide other rental assistance (e.g. Section 8, portable tenant based, HUD Operating Subsidy or other similar programs approved by the Agency) to meet the existing need as evidenced at application by a letter of intent signed by both the applicant and the local housing authority or other similar entities. — 4 points. OTE: If points are cMmed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the preference priority categories of Serves Lowest -Income Tenants/Rent Reduction for the same units. To receive these points, the applicant must comply with all program requirements for the assistance for which priority points were given, including maintaining rents within the appropriate payment standard for e project area in which the project is located for the full compliance and extended use period of the housing tax credits. For proposals claiming points for Project Based Rental Assistance, at the time of application, the applicant must submit a letter of intent signed by the Local Housing Authority. The letter of intent must establish that the Local Housing Authority: 1) is willing to commit the project based assistance to the proposed development; and. ) will submit an application of HUD project based assistance; or has sufficient project based authority available; or has authority available to convert to project base units. As a condition of Carryover or 8609, whichever occurs first, the applicant must submit a copy of the fully executed HUD Approval for the project -based rental assistance to be included in the development. For Project Based Rental Assistance in conjunction with a commitment for an "extended term contract" by he HRA, in addition to the above HUD application, at time of application the applicant must submit a etter of intent to enter into the "extended term contract" for project based assistance for a minimum of 10 ears which is signed by the Local Housing Authority. As a condition of Carryover or 8609, whichever cents first, the applicant must submit a fully executed copy of a copy of the HRA "extended term ontract" for the project -based assistance to be included in the development. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 13 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self-Sconng Worksheet Preference Priorities Developer Claimed MHFA Awarded (Preference Priority 5. continued) Pts. w/o Cite Assistance For Other Rental Assistance (e.g., Section 8, portable tenant based, HUD operating subsidy or other similar rent assistance programs approved by the Agency), at time of application the applicant must submit letter of intent to develop a cooperative agreement which is signed by the applicant and Local Housing Authority along, with the completed Agreement to Utilize Public Housing and Section 8 Waiting Lists. As a condition of Carryover or 8609, whichever occurs fust, the applicant must submit a fully executed copy of the cooperatively developed housing plan. TOTAL POINTS 87 99 Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 14 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self -Scoring Worksheet Under penalty of perjury. Owner hereby certifies the information Provided herein is true and accurate. Lo Of. Its: Name of Owner: Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC (Signature) (Name of Legal Entity) (Title)(Managing General Partner) (Print or type name of signatory) Please Note: During the competition process, MHFA's review of the submitted scoring points worksheet is only to validate that the points claimed me eligible, to reduce points claimed if not eligible, and to determine points awarded. MHFA will not award additional points which are not initially claimed by the Applicant/Owner. Many performance obligations are created by the claiming of certain scoring points. As such, MHFA cannot and will not assume the position of creating any such performance obligations on behalf of the Applicant/Owner. Also Note: Applications funded under the Joint Powers Agreement most also comply with the sub -allocators selection criteria defined in their Qualified Allocation Plan. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 15 of 15 (MTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 2006 Self -Scoring Worksheet CITY OF CHMOSSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Bax 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Justin Miller, Assistant City Manl DATE: June 1, 2005 OS of RE: Sand Companies Tax Credit Application Discussion Administration BACKGROUND Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952 2271110 The Sand Companies have acquired the property at the northwest corner of new Building Inspections Highway 212 and the relocated Highway 101. Within their entire development, Fax: 952.227.1190 PFax:9522.27.1190 which is proposed to include 150 housing units and six acres of commercial P Po g development, they intend to construct a 48 unit apartment complex. The Sand Engineering Companies have had success in the past in constructing apartment complexes that P:2.217 Fax: 952.227.1170 are in the more affordable price range than many of the housing options currently available. Finance PFax:952.227.1110 Fax: 952.227.1110 The Sand Companies are in the process of applying for the Minnesota Housing P P g Finance Agency 2005 Housing Tax Credit Program. This is a very competitive Park a Recreation process, as numerous applications are submitted for a finite amount of resources. PFax:955227.1110 One way in which their application can gain additional points is for the local Fax: 952,227.1110 jurisdiction to assist in their application. There are numerous ways in which the Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard city could help, and they include: Phone: 952.227.1400 a Waiver of assessments Fax: 952.227.1404 a Density bonuses Planning & a Reduced setbacks Natural Resources a Decrease road widths P5211 Fax:952.227.1110 a Flexibility in standards a Waiver of fees Public works a Tax Increment Financing 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax 952.227.1310 Their PUD application is being considered by the Planning Commission on June Senior Cerner 7te, with an anticipated City Council date of June 27`s. The tax credit application Phone: 952.227.1125 g fY diiPossible for their Y are is due on June 28 , so the looking or an direction Fax: 952.227.1110 application. Some of the above items may be addressed in the PUD which is currently being developed (setbacks, flexibility in standards, etc.). However, the Web ase www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us developer is interested in learning if the cit council is willing to create a Tax Pe g Y g Increment Financing (TIF) district to help support the project. If a district were to be created, staff would recommend that it be structured similar to the Presbyterian Homes district. In that case, the developer is receiving 90% of the increment produced for five years, then 50% of the increment produced for another two years (total of seven years). While exact numbers would have to be fleshed out, a preliminary analysis would look like this: The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. F 0 48 units paying $1,200/year in taxes $57,600 90% of increment for five years $259,200 50% of increment for two additional years $57,600 Estimated total contribution $316,800 This is a very preliminary number, and cannot predict future tax rates or property assessments. A full process, including a financial analysis and public hearings, would still need to be followed in order for a TIF district to be approved. Representatives from the Sand Companies will be present at Monday's meeting to make a brief presentation about their company and project. RECOMMENDATION Since the deadline for the tax credit application is rapidly approaching, the developer would like some direction on what, if any, assistance the City is interested in approving. While formal approvals cannot be provided by the deadline, a letter of support indicating what the City is willing to provide will assist the developer in their application process. Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.7190 Engineering The development was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning US- 0 1 Commission on June 7, 2005. MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager C�rl l l�p OF FROM: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner CgANgA 0 Park A Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 DATE: June 23, 2004 7700 Markel Boulevard Recreation center 2310 Coulter Boulevard The Planning p Commission held a public hearing on June 7, 2005, to review the PC Boz 147 Chanhassen,MN55311 SUBJ: Request For a Rezoning ofFrom Residential Single am �l gf Property lFil g Y proposed development. The summary and verbatim minutes are item la of this Planning a To Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use Located at the Northwest Administration Phone:1100 the east side of future Highway 101 and questioned if it can be moved to the west. Intersection of the Future Alignment of Highway 101 and Lyman Fax .1110 52.2272271 Fax 952.227.1110 Boulevard, Sand Canies, Inc. — Plin Case No. 05-01 anCompanies, Planning p g Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.7190 Engineering The development was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning Phone: 952.271110 1760 Commission on June 7, 2005. Fax: 952.227,1 Finance ACTION REQUIRED Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 City Council approval requires a two-thirds vote of City Council present. Park A Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation center 2310 Coulter Boulevard The Planning p Commission held a public hearing on June 7, 2005, to review the Phone: 952.227.1400 proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to approve the Fax: 952.2271404 proposed development. The summary and verbatim minutes are item la of this Planning a agenda packet. The Planning Commission discussed the location of the trail along Natural Resources the east side of future Highway 101 and questioned if it can be moved to the west. Phone: 952 227 1130 The trail was located along the east to maintain continuity with the northern portion Fax 952.227.1110 of the trail. It could not be placed on both sides of the highway for financial reasons. Public Works 1591 Park Road RECOMMENDATION Phone: 952.221 .1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the motion rezoning Senior Center the property located at the northwest intersection of the future alignment of Phone: 952.2271125 Highway 101 and Lyman Boulevard with an approximate area of 24 acres from Fax: 952.2271110 Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use incorporating Web Site the design standards as specified in the staff report dated June 7, 2005. www.o.chanhassen.mn.us ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated June 7, 2005. gAptank2005 planning case \05-01 sand companies concept pud-mwningkezoning\executive suwrary.doc The City of Chanhassen e A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Request for a rezoning of property from Residential Single Family, RSF, to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use, PUD. LOCATION: Northwest intersection of the future alignment of Highwayl01 and Lyman Boulevard. APPLICANT: Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue, PO Box 727 Waite Park, MN 56387-0727 Jim Sand (320) 202-3100 PRESENT ZONING: Residential Single Family — RSF 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Mixed Use ACREAGE: 24+ Acres SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rezoning of property from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use and approval of Planned Unit Development Standards. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners beyond 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving a rezoning because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The request before the Planning Commission is to rezone property located on the northwest and southwest intersection of the future alignment of Highways 212/101 and north of Lyman Boulevard. There is no site plan attached to this application and development of the site is not intended to take place until the realignment of 212/101 is complete. As each element is ready to develop, a site plan and/or a subdivision will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval. On January 24, 2005, the City Council approved the concept Planned Unit Development for this project. The purpose of the current review is to rezone the property and establish a PUD ordinance with design standards. BACKGROUND: LOCATION/SITE DATA The site is located at the northwest and southwest intersection of the future alignment of Highways 212/101 and north of Lyman Boulevard. The site has an area of approximately 24 acres and is currently zoned residential single family, RSF. s Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 3 LAND USE PLAN The Land Use Plan designates areas around the proposed TH 1011M 212 interchange as mixed use. This category has been established to accommodate either commercial or high-density residential developments. The high density category, which includes units with a maximum net density of 16.0 units per acre, accommodates apartments and higher density condominium units, but would also permit the development of town home type units. The commercial use is intended to support or complement high-density residential development. The commercial uses include convenience grocery stores, day care facilities, etc., or those uses that meet the daily needs of the residents. An individual user would be limited to 8,000 square feet. PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION/NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING/PROJECT BACKGROUND The applicant has met with the Planning Commission informally at two separate work sessions and held a neighborhood meeting on December 16, 2004. On January 4, 2005, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the Concept PUD for the subject Site. This plan was later approved by the City Council on January 24, 2005. Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 4 The intent of these meetings was to begin to develop a layout design and a planned unit development that complements the community. The final draft layout that was arrived at reflected a residential component within the area north and south of Lake Susan Drive with the highest density concentration facing future Highway 101. The portion of the site located south of the future alignment of Highway 212 consists of a mix of commercial and residential uses. In this instance, the residential encompasses the western portion of the site while the commercial part occupies the remainder of the site, and faces Highway 101, 212, and Lyman Boulevard ;hway Plans w/Site Layout North Site Location ReAg.M Highway 101 New Highway 212 Pmposed LightM Intersection Pasture Southwxst 1Netm Transit Station South site Location L)mm Boutevnd & Highwov 101 Interchange Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 5 Staff has reviewed the proposed development against the standards established by the Environmental Quality Board to evaluate the need for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Based on an assumption of a maximum development intensity of 150 dwelling units and 75,000 square feet of commercial and office space, the development did not meet the criteria for a mandatory EAW. Access to the site is being examined by the City, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), and the developer. It is anticipated that the access to the northern site will be gained via Lake Susan Drive. MnDOT may allow full access to the site if the intersection maintains a minimum distance of 600 feet from the intersection of Lake Susan Drive and Highway 101. Curb cats must maintain a minimum distance of 600 feet to the intersection of Lake Susan Drive and Highway 101 EM _ eta REZONING The Sand Companies, Inc. is requesting to rezone the property from RSF, Residential Single Family, to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use (PUD). Future Highway 212 will bisect the site. Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 6 Realigned Highway 101 will run along the east portion of the site. A residential neighborhood zoned Planned Unit Development -Residential, is located west of the site. The area south of Lyman Boulevard is zoned Agricultural Estate District and is guided Residential Low Density. The area north of the subject site is zoned Single Family Residential District and is guided Residential Low Density. All properties located at the intersection of future Highway 212/101 are guided mixed use which pen -nits high density residential and neighborhood oriented commercial. The 2020 Land Use Plan shows this area designated for development as Mixed Use Development. Appropriate zoning for this land use is PUD -Mixed Use, Neighborhood Commercial, and High Density Residential. Staff has prepared a Planned Unit Development Ordinance that will regulate and set standards for the development of this site including permitted uses, landscaping, setbacks, structure height, signage, building materials, architectural standards, parking, etc. This site is in the MUSA area. Staff is recommending that this area be rezoned to PUD -Mixed Use. PUD FINDINGS The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed Planned Unit Development has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of the land use plan and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. It provides mixed uses (residential and neighborhood commercial) at the intersection of realigned Highway 101 and future Highway 212. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The proposed uses are and will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area through the implementation of the design standards, landscaping buffers, architecture, etc. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: The proposed uses will conform with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance such as design standards, signage, durable materials, uses, etc. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 7 Finding: The proposed commercial uses will provide a convenient location for the surrounding area to take care of daily needs. The housing units have been laid out in a fashion where the higher density units are located at the opposite end from the existing single family homes. In general, the layout of the site shows higher intensity uses are located farther away form existing homes. It could potentially have a positive impact on values by creating a buffer to the interstate and adding convenience to the homeowners in the area. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. Finding: The site is located within the Municipal Urban Service Area. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: There has been numerous meetings between the City of Chanhassen and MNDOT addressing traffic flow within this area. There will be tum lanes, signalized intersections, medians, etc., to improve traffic flow. Traffic generation by the proposed uses will be within the capabilities of streets serving the property. LANDSCAPING The landscape plan for the development will need to use landscape materials to accomplish the following: improve the appearance of the site, buffer between the proposed development and neighboring properties, and reduce noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. Specifically, landscaping will be required for screening of any trash storage areas, loading areas or large, unadorned building walls. Parking lots will also have landscaping requirements. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, should be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells should be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. The City anticipates undulating berms, north of Lyman Boulevard, north and south of Highway 212 and west of Highway 101. These areas shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. The City would like to see native landscaping incorporated into the design wherever possible. TRAILS AND SIDEWALKS Maintaining and creating new pedestrian/bicycle routes to the subject site is very important. The construction of new Highway 101 will include the installation of a ten -foot trail along the east side of the highway. In conjunction with the construction of Highway 212, trails will be installed from Great Plains Boulevard to Lyman Boulevard, and along the north side of Lyman Boulevard. Appropriate and adequate internal sidewalk connections must also be planned to allow convenient and safe non -vehicular traffic throughout the site. Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 8 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: The Planning Commission recommends approval of rezoning the property located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of realigned Highway 101 and Lyman Boulevard with an approximate area of 24 acres from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development - Mixed Use incorporating the following design standards: CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a MIXED USE PUD including a NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses • The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with meeting the daily needs of the neighborhood. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on these lots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Commercial and office uses shall be limited to the area located south of Highway 212. Residential uses shall be located north of Highway 212 and along the western portion of the southern half. • Small to medium-sized restaurant -not to exceed 8,000 square feet per building (no drive-thru windows) • Banks with a drive-in service window • Office • Day care • Neighborhood scale commercial up to 8,000 square feet per tenant • Convenience store with or without gas pumps • Specialty retail (Book Store, Jewelry, Sporting Goods Sale/Rental, Retail Sales, Retail Shops, Apparel Sales, etc.) • Personal Services (an establishment or place of business primarily engaged in providing individual services generally related to personal needs, such as a Tailor Shop, Shoe Repair, Self -Service Laundry, Laundry Pick-up Station, Dry Cleaning, Dance Studios, etc). Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 9 • Residential High Density (8-16 units per net acre). The total number of units for the entire site may not exceed 150 units. C. Building Area • Commercial/Office — Not to exceed 75,000 square feet for the entire development • Maximum Commercial/Office lot usage is a Floor Area Ratio of 0.3 • Maximum office/commercial building area per tenant may not exceed 8,000 square feet • Maximum residential units may not exceed 150 units. d. Prohibited Ancillary Uses • Drive-thru Windows except banks or pharmacies. • Outdoor storage and display of merchandise e. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Boundary Building/ Parking Setbacks (feet) Lyman Boulevard 50/50 Highway 101 50/50 Highway 212 50/50 Northerly Project Property Line 50/20 Westerly Project Property Line 50/20 Internal Project property lines 0/0 Hard Surface Coverage -Residential 50% Commercial and Office Hard Surface Coverage 70 Maximum Commercial (Retail) Building/Structure Height 1 story Maximum Office Building/Structure Height 2 stories Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less E Non Residential Building Materials and Design There shall not be underdeveloped backsides of buildings. All elevations shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article 3OGII. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 10 g. Residential Standards Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article XXIH. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 1. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 2. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick, stone, etc. 3. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. h. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights-of-way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. 1. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to, truck loading areas, trash storage, parking lots, Large unadorned building massing, etc. 2. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 3. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells shall be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. 4. Undulating berms, north of Lyman Boulevard, north and south of Highway 212 and west of Highway 101 shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. 6. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. i. Street Furnishings Benches, kiosks, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 11 j. Signage The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment and the business's ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet the city's goals: a. Establish standards which permit businesses a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise their name and service; b. Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination; c. Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; d. Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; e. Preserve and protect property values; f. Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; g. Limit temporary commercial signs and advertising displays which provide an opportunity for grand opening and occasional sales events while restricting signs which create continuous visual clutter and hazards at public right-of-way intersections. j.1. Project Identification Sian: One project identification sign for the commercial portion of the development located at the entrance off of Highway 101. Project identification signs shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. j.2. Monument Sian: One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrance to the development off of Lake Susan Drive. One monument sign per lot shall be permitted for the commercial portion of the site. These signs shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five feet in height. These signs shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 12 j.3. Wall Signs: a. The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend greater than 20 feet above the ground. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, or translucent facing. b. Illuminated signs that can be viewed from neighborhoods outside the PUD site, are prohibited. c. Tenant signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant's proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 15% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. j.4. Festive Flags/Banners a. Flags and banners shall be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. b. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric or vinyl. c. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. d. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two feet. e. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. f. Flags and banners which are torn or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. j.5. Building Directory a. In multi -tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. j.6 Directional Signs a. On -premises signs shall not be larger than four (4) square feet. The maximum height of the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet from the ground. The placement of directional signs on the property shall be so located such that the sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties (including site lines or confusion of adjoining ingress or egress) or the general appearance of the site from public rights-of-way. No Chanhassen Gateway Rezoning • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 13 more than four (4) signs shall be allowed per lot. The city council may allow additional signs in situations where access is confusing or traffic safety could be jeopardized. b. Off -premises signs shall be allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately routed through residential streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. c. Bench signs are prohibited except at transit stops as authorized by the local transit authority. d. Signs and Graphics. Wherever possible, traffic control, directional and other public signs should be consolidated and grouped with other street fixtures and furnishings to reduce visual clutter and to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement. A system of directional signs should also be established to direct traffic within the commercial area and away from residential areas. j.7. Prohibited Signs: • Pylon signs are prohibited. • Back lit awnings are prohibited. • Window Signs are prohibited except for company logo/symbol and not the name. Such logo shall not exceed 10% of a window area • Menu Signs are prohibited. j.8. Sign Design and Permit Requirements: a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. c. Wall business signs shall comply with the city's sign ordinance for the Neighborhood business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the "street" front and primary parking lot front of each building. k. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the development. High pressure sodium vapor lamps with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. Chanhassen Gateway Rez• g • Planning Case No. 05-01 June 7, 2005 Page 14 2. Light fixtures should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). Street light fixtures should accommodate vertical banners for use in identifying the commercial area. 3. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than '/2 candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 4. Lighting for parking areas shall minimize the use of lights on pole standards in the parking area. Rather, emphasis should be placed on building lights and poles located in close proximity to buildings. Non Residential Parking 1. Parking shall be provided based on the shared use of parking areas whenever possible. Cross access easements and the joint use of parking facilities shall be protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. 2. The development shall be treated as an integrated shopping center and provide a minimum of one space per 200 square feet of commercial/retail area. The office/personal service component shall be treated as an integrated office building and provide 4.5 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 49,999 square feet, four per thousand square feet for the second 50,000 square feet, and 3.5 per thousand square feet thereafter. M. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Application. 3. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. gAplant2005 planning casest05-01 sand companies concept pud-rezoningkezoninglstaff report pc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Request for a rezoning of property from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use located on the northwest intersection of the future alignment of Highways 101 and Lyman Blvd. Application of Sand Companies, Inc. On June 7, 2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Sand Companies, Inc. for Planned Unit Development property from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Residential Single Family. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Mixed Use. 3. The description of the property is: the area bounded by Lyman Boulevard to the south, future realigned Highway 101 to the east, existing Highway 101 to the west, and residential neighborhood to the north. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 0 0 5. The planning report #05-01 dated June 7, 2005, prepared by Sharmin Al-Jaff, et al is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 7d' day of June, 2005. WIS Its Chairman gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-01 sand companies concept pud-rezoningVezoningVindings of fact.doc N 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name and Address: Sand Properties, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue, PO Box 727 Waite Park, Minnesota 56387-0727 Contact: Jim Sand Phone: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320) 202-3139 Email: JWsand@Sandcompanies.com Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review* Subdivision* Planning Case No. Owner Name and Address: Same as Applicant Phone: Fax: Email: Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign** - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost' - $50 CUP/SPR/VAC/VAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. ' Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81W X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. " Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. 0 PROJECT NAME: Chanhassen Gateway North -Residential LOCATION: Nr Quadrant of new Highways 101 & 212 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Survey - Parcels #1, #5 & #6 TOTAL ACREAGE: 6.2582 WETLANDS PRESENT: YES ✓ NO PRESENT ZONING: Mixed Use REQUESTED ZONING: Mixed Use PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Vacant REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Multifamily REASON FOR REQUEST: Approvals of the planned unit development for the apartment and townhome projects. This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information 1 have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Signature of Fee Owner May 6, 2005 Date May 6, 2005 Date GAplanVorms0evelopment Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/05 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on May 26, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Rezoning, Sand Companies, Inc. — Planning Case No. 05-01 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and swom to before me thisola}n day of 2005. Notary blic rr'/' :�' , :4 ]NOary IM T. MEUMSSEN Publk>-Minnesota M"m1"b ,wim,zmo {CANNED Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday,June 7 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for rezoning of property from Residential Single Proposal: Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. Planning File: 05-01 Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Property Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Boulevard and the Location: future realigned Highway 101. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. m The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the c applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the Happens public hearing through the following steps: at at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. C 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 Comments: or e-mail saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, zonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the ning Commission. City ordinances require all property within Soo feet of the subject site to be notified of the lication In writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialMdustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. dg�&&tsg�aga 5^ 2o0g� Qr��S�a�W�a 0 iL }E ` C 'sT ��p L' � ep ° N�g�}E��g�.U2 `mvvo � n ykrnga°ah Bgq CC qS'_ N G O OU IC _NLQt�gp E PAQ C.�n r� W d E � N m � c c Y C= -?5 H � m C dg�&&tsg�aga 5^ 2o0g� Qr��S�a�W�a 0 iL }E ` C 'sT ��p L' � ep ° N�g�}E��g�.U2 `mvvo � n ykrnga°ah Bgq CC qS'_ N G O OU IC _NLQt�gp E 0 CHRISTOPHER T & AIMEE J ADAMS RICHARD C & SUSAN M AMBERSON 8690 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8549 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT F & KAREN L ANDERSON GREGG A & MICHELLE D ALINE 8561 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8705 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG R & GERALDINE BARETTE R STEVEN & MAURA BARNETT 8695 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8709 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TERRY LEE & MARI T BERANAK JAMES & SARA BORNES 8576 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8715 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ALAN CNO & EDWARD S & NANCY J COUGHLIN SHERRI BEIER 587 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN HLS DRS CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHA JAMES A CURRY JAMES A CURRY 6105 EDEN PRAIRIE RD #17 6105 EDEN PRAIRIE RD 417 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 PATRICK A & LAURENE FARRELL JASON J GILBERTSON & 801LYMAN BLVD KATJAJEANNERET CHANHASSEN MN 55317 583 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS P HAGMAN & HUSSAM HASSOUN SUSAN M R I 8537 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 5553317 625 SUMMERFIELD IELD D CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DANIEL M & MELISSA L HERZOG CHRISTOPHER & DEBORA K HOL 8790 LAKE SUSAN CT 8687 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RONALD G & JOYCE L HORR BRIAN W & KRISTIN A HOULE 8513 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 880 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL B & CATHERINE ANDERSON 8709 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RUSSELL BAHENSKY 8552 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WILLIAM E BENSON 8596 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOSHUA E & CORA L CONKLIN 8990 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER & ANGELA CROOK 8702 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NORMAN & JACQUELINE ENGEL 8699 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG D GUTSCHOW & BARBARA J CLAYTON 8691 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGORY J & SUSAN L HENKEL 8699 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TROY & JENNIFER HOLASEK 8556 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BENJAMIN R K & DONNA M JOHNSON 8521 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 0 SHANNON G & MICHELLE A KERN LAWRENCE C & ELIZABETH KLEIN 607 SUMMERFIELD DR 545 LAKE DR #219 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK S & TRACY L KURVERS 8560 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DENNIS H & RUTH L LAUFENBURGER 8673 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC W LORENTZSON & TIFFANY L LORENTZSON 591 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SO VAN LY & SUSAN YKUN UNG 8509 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CYNTHIA ANN MILLER 891 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LISA K MOORE 8682 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC S & JULIE A OYEN 615 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PHOULITHAT PHANDANOUVONG & VATSANA PHANDANOUVONG 8529 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & STACEY G LAKOSKY 8533 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KHANH & KHIEM LE 631 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 ROBERT B MARTINOVICH & PATRICIA A MARTINOVICH 8592 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREG ALLAN MILLER 8801 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL W & ANA E MORENO 603 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVE J & MARY A PANENO 8564 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY A & MICHELLE M REITAN 8900 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 AL & M J KLINGELHUTZ TRUST C/O ALOYSIUS & M J KLINGELHUTZ 8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANTHONY LARSON & LINDSAY NELSON 8545 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HARLAN C LEOPOLD 8553 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID S & JANICE A LUNDQUIST 8705 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL G & KAREN L MCNEIL 8695 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TIMOTHY S & TAMARA S MILLER 579 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CRAIG L & PATRICIA A MULLEN 611 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SEONGWOO PARK & MIN JEONG HAN 8580 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL & MELISSA ROHRMOSER 8698 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RAYMOND J BOOB JR & PAUL C SCHNETTLER & CHAE SUK ROOB THOMAS A & GRETA K ROSE KATE D WARD SCHNETTLER 8584 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8541 CHANHASSEN HLS DRS 599 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 AMY -J SCHUETTE ETAL 8990 QUINN RD PO BOX 68 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DONALD T SINNIGER & MICHELE M ABEL 600 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JUDSON E & JILL C SNELL 8694 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CURTIS A & SUSAN M SPERLING 8525 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TODD S & LORI E STRAND 8557 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KEITH E & LISA L SCHWEGLER 619 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEPHEN C & JUDITH A SLACK 8675 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES JONATHON SOMMERS & KAREN D ROGGE 8683 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SPRINGFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSN 7100 MADISON AVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 BRUCE A & SHEILA M TANQUIST 8569 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP INC UTPAL R VAIDYA & ATTN: TAX DEPT M/S 624 LEENA UTPAL VAIDYA PO BOX 7028 861 LAKE SUSAN DR BEDMINSTER NJ 07921 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRYAN J & LISA C VAN NINGEN 8686 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 FRANK T & MARY LOU WHALEY 851 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMI D WALKER 8517 CHANHASSEN HLLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 MARK & KRISTINA SCHWENDINGER 8708 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID M SMITH & PATRICE N LUNDGREN-SMITH 8568 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & JODI L SOTEBEER 8565 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STATE OF MINNESOTA -DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD MAILSTOP 631 ST PAUL MN 55155 ABBA J TREGOBOV & SUSANA P MACHADO-TREGOBOV 8714 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN H & RUTH M VANCE 8588 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CORY M & PAMELA S WATKINS 595 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Development Plans: Gateway Place Chanhassen, Minnesota A Mufti f amif2q Living Communit-N Prepared for: Chanhassen City Council Prepared by: Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park, Minnesota 56387-0727 Telephone (320) 202-3100 Facsimile (320) 202-3139 witiiv. S andC ompanie s. corn ❖SCI Sand Companies, lnc. (320) 202-3100 %ite Pork, Minnesota wwwiandCompanieuom June l, 2005 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Executive Summary Project Developer/Architect/Contractor/Manger ' Development Location Development Site ' &&ding Description Unit W Rents & lame Restrictions ' Property Management The Need for Life Cycle Housing ' Local Participation - A Key to Being Selected Development TiYm eline Conclusion Attachments Preliminary Development Plans ' Required City Support Letter City Reference Letters ' MHFA Scoring Worksheet Sand Companies, Inc. Profile 4*SCI SandCwWames, I= (320) 202-3100 Mbite Pae*, Minnesota MMM.SQIIECd,IQRIIi[Yd„ Attachment I Attachment II Attachment III Attachment IV Attachment V (CANNED &* Gateway Place A Mufti f amifN Living CommunitN Executive Summary The proposal described herein is to request support from the City of Chanhassen for a 48 unit affordable housing, tax credit development at the northwest corner of new Highways 101 and 212 called "Gateway Place". The three story apartment style building will include underground heated parking with six one bedroom units, twenty-seven two bedroom units and fifteen three bedroom units. ' The location of Gateway Place is a perfect fit for the Smart Growth concept as the site does not require extensions of water and sewer, is near many services and jobs and has easy access to transportation as it is just north of the future Southwest Metro Transit ' Station. With support and assistance from the City of Chanhassen, Gateway Place will be a secure, well-maintained and managed community that offers life cycle housing opportunities for the residents of Chanhassen. ' Project Developer/Architect/Contractor/Manager Since 1991, Sand Companies, Inc. has earned its reputation for professionalism, thoroughness and proven results in the construction, property management, development and architectural industries. Our reputation and accomplishments can be attributed to the many successful partnerships formed over the years. Not only do we facilitate all aspects of the real estate development, we become a part of it by establishing successful working relationships and communicating effectively with all parties involved. Since our inception in 1991, we have successfully developed and/or constructed eleven senior housing developments (381 units), eight luxury rental developments (1,173 units), seventeen affordable housing developments (452 units), eleven limited service hotels (853 guest rooms) and six single family developments (242 lots). With careful planning and extensive due diligence, Sand Companies, Inc. has built a successful portfolio and has developed a track record of successful real estate development. (See Attachment V) ••Swtd Shm CI (320) 202-3100 NhUe flan*, Mine a wwSendCawpe.I. Development Location The Gateway Place project site is located at the northwest quadrant of the new Highways 101 and 212. The site is just one-quarter mile south of Downtown Chanhassen and Highway 5. The access point for the site will be off of future Lake Susan Drive. Lake Susan Drive will connect to the realigned Highway 101 which will be controlled by a traffic signal. The proposed assessment to this site for the traffic signal and the turn lanes on Lake Susan Drive are $22,500. Development Location Existing Site Conditions Future Residential & Commercial Future SW Metro Transit Station Site wIMIghways 101 &212 2 Gateway Place Development Plans ' Development Site ' On May 2, 2005, Sand Properties, Inc. purchased 20.17 acres from James and Barbara Curry which encompasses land at the northwest and southwest quadrants of future Highways 101 and 212. (See Attachment I) Development Site The development site for Gateway Place is 2.19 acres in size and fronts future Lake Susan Drive to the north, future Highway 212 to the south and the newly aligned Highway 101 to the east. The property to the west of the site is also being developed by Sand Companies, Inc. and its proposed use is residential townhomes. The site will share a common access with the townhomes with signage located at the access point. The site will be fully landscaped with trees, shrubs, sod and lawn irrigation system. A private tot lot for the children of Gateway Place will be located in the courtyard on the east side of the building along with a patio area with grills, picnic tables and benches. Forty-eight surface parking stalls are proposed along with an access drive on the south end of the building to the underground parking garage. Catch basins for storm water will be located throughout the parking area and will drain to a common retention pond. The site will be fully lighted with lighting types that meet the City Ordinance. Gateway Place Development Plans 3 Buildine Description ' Gateway Place will consist of forty-eight units within one building. The building will be three stories above grade and will incorporate wood frame construction. The below grade, 60 space parking area will consist of poured concrete or block walls with structural concrete pre -cast decking and columns. The exterior of the building will be rock -faced block and steel or vinyl siding and will incorporate accents and decorative louvers. (See Attachment 1) Building Elevation ' Common Amenities: ♦ Underground, Heated Parking ♦ Resident Storage ' ♦ Leasing/Manager's Office ♦ Secured Entries/Camera System ♦ Reception Area ' ♦ Mail Room ♦ Trash chutes ♦ Elevator Floor Plans Unit Amenities: ♦ Dishwasher ♦ Refrigerator ♦ Self cleaning range ♦ Walk-in Closets ♦ Over the range microwave ♦ Washer & dryer ♦ Mini blinds ♦ Emergency call system +ISCI = Gateway Place Development Plans 4 Unit Mix. Rents & Income Restrictions ' Gateway Place will provide six one bedroom units, twenty-seven two bedroom units and fifteen three bedroom units with very affordable rents for working families of Chanhassen. The proposed contract rents include one underground parking space, water/sewer, refuse removal and heat. All units will have income restrictions set at 60% or less of area median income (AMI) and rents set at 30% of 50% of AMI. Below is table summarizing unit mix, rents and income limits: Unit Mix, Rents & Income Limits Projected Annual Hourly # of Units # of BR's Sq. Ft. Rents Income Income 6 1 850 $ 650 $ 36,960 or less $ 17.77 or less 27 2 1,100 $ 825 $ 46,200 or less $ 21.21 or less 15 3 1,450 $ 900 $ 49,920 or less $ 24.00 or less Table Notes: 1. Unit Square Footages are approximates 2. Projected Rents are contract rents and do not include resident utility allowances 3. AMI for Carver County as of March 1, 2005 was $77,000 according to HUD 4. All incomes are household incomes 5. Hourly income is based on 2,080 hours annually 6. Annual & hourly income restrictions for a one bedroom unit is based on a household of two 7. Annual & hourly income restrictions for a two bedroom unit is based on a household of four 8. Annual & hourly income restrictions for a three bedroom unit is based on a household of five Property Management Good property management is the key to a successful rental property. Sand Companies, Inc., who currently manages over 1,100 rental units and six limited service hotels, will manage the day-to-day and ongoing operations of Gateway Place. Sand Companies, Inc. started in the business of rental property management in 1998 when it became challenged with the poor third party management and maintenance of its properties. Since Sand Companies, Inc. is a long-term owner of its properties, high quality management practices are the goal and the standard. With hands-on management, potential property and resident problems are headed off and the continual practice of preventive maintenance preserves the long-term quality of the developments. A visit to any of the sites managed by Sand Companies, Inc. will show how important attention to detail is to the company. Sand Companies, Inc. will be responsible for hiring and training the manager, marketing the property, setting up strict resident selection criteria, along with daily communications, regular site visits, accounting, human resources, renovations and purchasing on behalf of the property. Gateway Place Development Plans As a manager and owner, Sand Companies, Inc. has a very strict and stringent resident screening process and is an active member of the Crime Free Multi -Housing Program wherever available. All potential residents sign off on receiving the specific screening criteria before filling out an application. Sand Companies, Inc. not only does local checks on applicants, but also out of state checks, as applicable. The following is a brief summary of Sand Companies, Inc.'s minimum screening criteria Sand Companies, Inc. reserves the right to be more stringent. 1. Age: All applicants must be at least 18 years of age. Any residents 18 years of age or older must be listed on the lease and also meet the screening criteria. 2. Income: For income restricted units, total gross household income must be at least two times the amount of rent, including utilities. 3. Credit: Applicants with consistent history of NSF checks will be denied. Applicants with outstanding collections or judgments will be denied. Any applicants with an unlawful detainer will be denied. Applicants that have filed for bankruptcy in the last three years may be denied. Extenuating circumstances may be considered in the event of medical or other catastrophe. Applicants with a consistent history of late payment of their financial obligations will be denied. Sand Companies, Inc. also establishes minimum credit "beacon" scores. 4. Unlawful/Criminal History: Applicants with a history of unlawful or criminal activity will be denied. Persons involved in drug related criminal activity will be denied. Sand Companies, Inc. also uses the Crime/Drug Free lease addendum, which is signed by all residents (18 years of age or older) of the household and is made part of the lease. Applicants with dependents in the household with criminal offenses will be denied. 5. Rental History: Applicants with a rental history must provide at least one verifiable rental landlord reference with a minimum of one-year rental history. Applicants with a history of late rental payments, verified housekeeping problems and/or a history of disturbing the peace will be denied. The Need for Life Cvcle Housin According to the Family Housing Fund, a non-profit funder for affordable housing in the Twin Cities metro area, housing is "affordable" if a family pays no more than 30 percent of its income for housing costs. In the Twin Cities metro area, more than 185,000 lower income households pay more than this amount for housing. Almost half live in the suburbs. ' GVA Marquette Advisors reported that the average rent for a two bedroom and three bedroom apartment in Chanhassen was approximately $1,050 and $1,250 per ' month, respectively. Based on 30% of household income going for rent, a resident would have to earn an annual wage of $42,000 ($20.19/hr.) to afford a two bedroom and $50,000 ($24.04/hr) to afford a three bedroom apartment in Chanhassen. MdUE Gateway Place Development Plans 6 With a significant number of employers in Chanhassen being retail, service and manufacturing related, most positions offer wages well below the housing affordability level currently available in Chanhassen. The projected contract rents for Gateway Place make housing affordable (30% of income for rent) to residents for a one bedroom unit that make an annual wage of $26,000 ($12.50/hr.), $33,000 ($15.87/hr.) for a two bedroom unit and $36,000 ($17.31/hr.) for a three bedroom unit. Professions that fit this wage include bank tellers, medical records technicians, school bus drivers, teacher's aide, home health aide, office/administrative support, retail sales and many others. The Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan states that "...One of the primary purposes of a community is to serve as a place of residence for its citizens. Assuming this charge, offering a mix of life cycle housing opportunities becomes a challenge for local governments...". "...While committed to providing life cycle housing, the city must overcome obstacles to their development. One of the most difficult impediments to providing one facet of life cycle housing and/or affordable housing, is land cost..." "...Developers must be brought in as partners in providing life cycle housing...". Sand Companies, Inc. is offering to help meet some of the life cycle housing needs in the City of Chanhassen at a location that is ideal for this type of housing. As the City Comprehensive plans states, the city can not do this alone and we as a developer can t not do it alone either. We are proposing a partnership with resources from Sand Companies, Inc., the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) and the City of Chanhassen to complete a life cycle housing development that offers an affordable ' housing option to working families of Chanhassen in a manner and design that is no different than a typical market rate multifamily development. Local Participation — A Key to Being Selected The main funding source for Gateway Place is proposed to be federal housing tax credits which are allocated annually by MHFA. The Section 42 tax credit program is a national program that started in 1987. It is one of the most successful housing programs ever in the United States as it promotes private development of affordable housing versus public ownership and management. The application for funding is due to MHFA on June 28, 2005 for an allocation of 2006 credits. Because of the program's success, getting awarded a tax credit project is extremely competitive with much of the State's allocation going to non -profits in Minneapolis and St. Paul. The MHFA application weighs heavily on local participation as this allows more State dollars to fund more projects. Without local participation, an application by a for-profit developer has little or no chance of being funded. (See Attachment M Since the inception of the tax credit program, the City of Chanhassen has only received two allocations for projects in the city. One allocation was back in 1990 and the most recent one was nearly five years ago in 2000. Considering the growth, size and location of Chanhassen, only two projects is highly unusual. As a comparison, the City of Chaska has at least seven projects and an additional application coming in this year in which the city is participating with tax increment financing. 7 Gateway Place Development Plans As an experienced owner and developer of tax credit projects, Sand Companies, Inc. has had very good success by being awarded ten housing tax credit developments in ' the cities of Lakeville (195), Albany ('96), Hutchinson ('97), Mahtomedi ('98), Chaska ('99), Shakopee ('00), Blaine (m), Bloomington (101), Shakopee ('02) and St. Joseph ('04). We are confident that with local participation, the Gateway Place application will be very ' competitive. Local participation from the City can come in many forms from financial to ' flexibility in development standards along with letters of support. Of course, the more the City is willing to participate with, the higher the project will score on the tax credit application. (See Attachment III) ' Below are a list of participation methods and options we ask the City to consider for Gateway Place. We are not asking for all of them, but rather just providing a list for ' the City to pick and chose from based on what it feels most comfortable with. Participation Method OOy6ons to Consider Tax Increment Financing Agree to establish a housing TIF district similar to other past projects in Chanhassen ' Waiver of Assessments Agree to the waiver of the $22,500 in assessments relating to the site Density Bonuses Allow higher density thus reducing per unit ' land costs Reduce Setbacks Reduce setbacks ' Parking Requirements Reduce parking needs Decrease Road Widths Allow a private drive into the site versus a public road ' Flexibility in Standards Work with us on such things as flexibility in the building materials and fast track ' approvals Fee Wavier or a Portion City SAC/WAC $ 145,440 Park Dedication $ 148,800 ' Water Quality/Quantity $ 17,950 Development Fees $ ??? Because of the high land costs associated with this site along with the significant fees in Chanhassen for multifamily projects, flexibility in development standards will probably not be enough to help this project get selected by MHFA, especially with State cuts in MHFA's funding sources. We strongly encourage the City of Chanhassen to agree to set up a housing tax increment district for the project. The City does not need to establish a TIF district and have all the details worked out by the time of application, but just needs to commit to this if the project is selected. (See Attachment I) Sa Gateway Place Development Plans ' Development Timeline We have compiled and reviewed a substantial amount of information as it relates to Gateway Place in Chanhassen. Our research and knowledge of the industry indicates the development of this multifamily housing concept appears to be timely and feasible. ' We have targeted June 1, 2007 as the opening date. To meet these target dates, the following critical path of events is necessary: ' 1. Letter of Commitment from City of Chanhassen for local participation. June 2005 ' 2. Make application for tax credits & financing to MHFA. June 28, 2005 3. Gateway Place receives award from MHFA. October 2005 4. Complete City approval process. January 2006 ' 5. Final plans & specifications. April 2006 6. Closing on financing. July 2006 ' 7. Begin construction. July 2006 8. Initiate Marketing Plan. April 2007 9. Construction Complete. June 2007 Conclusion The site for Gateway Place accommodates all the principals of Smart Growth including linkage, jobs, land use and transportation. The site is a new development area and neighborhood issues relating to affordable housing will be minimal. The proposed development plans mirror the goals outlined in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. With local participation from the City of Chanhassen, local dollars can be leveraged against much greater State and Federal Funds. When complete; Gateway Place will offer life cycle housing options for the residents and employees of Chanhassen. Thank you for your consideration! `- Gateway Place Development Plans 9 Gateway Place A Muf ti f ami(N Living CommunitN Attachment I Preliminary Development Plans ❖SCI Sand Companies, Inc. ('m0�tlu•Pm Mammo•DeM (320) 202-3100 Waite Park, Minnesota w w w. Sa n dCom pa n i ea. tom E �P isP z =3 !� �t ZQNTS S Q 44V ,C 11 r 3s a t ` u� w f 3 ado R flij i tE 1 to �t!�•llijjtj! t 11 tl JimHIM i! ' !i �;�I�I�}iij�� s !i ;i�jj!I•��j��ij a a �ƒ p, E . %B�)�| f , ��`|!|[ k K §\)�f� k | § § � ! . § - / k ( < \ \ \ . k Gateway Place A Mufti f amifv Living CommunitN Attachment II 1 Required City Support Letter 1 ❖SCI Sand Companies, Inc c®m.mo.. ems, nw,�.. • w..�e (320) 202-3100 Waite Park, Minnesota w w w Sa n dCom pa n i es. con+ (City of Chanhassen Letterhead) June 2005 ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 ' Attention: Multifamily Underwriting RE: Housing Tax Credit Program & Super RFP. ' GATEWAY PLACE, CHANHASSEN. Dear Multifamily Development: ■ The Chanhassen City Council, at its meeting held on June _, 2005, has reviewed and endorsed the housing development proposal called Gateway Place which proposes forty- eight units of apartment homes within the City of Chanhassen. This endorsement is based upon the findings that the project will meet locally identified housing needs and that the proposed housing is in short supply in the local housing market. This need is ' evidenced by the gap between the local supply and demand for the proposed type of housing. ' (If applicable) The City also proposes local financial assistance for this project as part of its endorsement through the use of tax increment finance (TIF). The Chanhassen City ' Council has approved TIF at _% for _ years. Based on preliminary the tax figures, the approximate value of assistance over the life of the TIF is $ The City Council and Planning Commission have also reviewed the development plans ' for Gateway Place and will offer flexibility in development standards such as reduced set -backs, density bonuses and fast track permitting and approvals. ' The City Council's endorsement is evidenced by this letter of support for the proposed development. This City has taken significant measures including financial assistance as its part to help this project move forward. We respectively request funding approval for this needed development in the City of Chanhassen. Sincerely, ' Name Title ** Gateway Place A Mufti f ami[N Living Community Attachment III Reference Letters ❖SCI Sand Companies, Inc. Cmdrrttim ♦ P.,p Nt m • D dl (320) 202-3100 Waite Park, Minnesota www SandCompani".com C ify et ArD I i n q f e n Councilmember Noack introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 11-2004 RESOLUTION PLEDGING TIF SUPPORT THE FAIRVIEW TOWNHOME PROJECT WHEREAS, The Arlington City Council has reviewed and endorses the housing development proposal called Fairview Townhomes, which proposes twenty units of rental townhomes within the City of Arlington. This endorsement is based upon the findings that the project will meet locally identified housing needs and that the proposed housing is in short supply in the local housing market. This need is evidenced by the gap between the`}ocal supply and demand for the proposed type of housing;, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Arlington &eby proposes local financial assistance forthis 1 prof d!as part of this endorsement through the pse of tax`iacrement f nance (TIF). The ArlingtorT,City Council has approved ug-frpnt TIF Reven*i .Tote at 90% for 25 years in the amount of $107,000. ' Based on preliminary tax figures, the approximate value of the assistance over the life of the TIF is $763,551. The City Cpuncil and Commission also revie ed the development plans for �• the Fairview Townhom&and will &J �lib`d>ij #1�tY'iq'('dWAh6ent sta$dards such as reduced set -backs, densitybonuses adt{ac pfn�d ;peals. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Counc hnember Vrklan and upon poll beingtaken thereon the foil . _ . ed in f=, t thereof. Griep, Noac"eetz, Voight, Vrkha i and the £ollving`doted-against the sam one; and the following;1�tamed from votingF' ' None; tnd the following were se "one. 4 Adopted by the City until the City of Arlington this 6 day of Jul} , 2004. -- Signed: Mayor Attested: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor whose signature was attested by the City Administrator. 204 Shamrock Drive • Arlington, MN 55307 507/964-2378 • Fax: 507/964-5973 • E-mail: arling@frontiemet.net City of AF I i n g f e n July 20, 2004 ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1998 RE: Fairview Townhomes. Arlington, Minnesota, N D/ 1 ear Mutura mly Development: , The•'City of AdinStRn is committed t, provgding wo&fbree hosing to the city, which offeis a wide range of housing ppportunihes fo%is residents The city has "coopers Hely developed "a plan with the Developer of the Fairview Townhomes to provide this needed hofis}ng in the city. �> The city proposes local finance ass rt jot I ( &t� W 1 lof its endorsement. The ' ty PmPo \ ar ' �st�n� f ttsiis pYo,�� Arlington City Co it has appre��, }t nlg;qusing disfrict for the project. Based on pp�eeli tax figures, e ap ro ate value of a sis�ance o the life of the increment.�esiod`forF the development is $263,551. The up -front assistance in dfonh of a TIF venue Noted� the amount of $LO9,600i__� -"the development will 'include c9sts for land �usition, liublle impfove`mentsr and tion fists for,, up th taat incremyrit i _ - Land Donation of le Dev o ment Site. As part of the tar increment finance, the is willing to purchase the site and do tel t�ce Waiver of Develo ent Assessmeents. As part of the ttax increment finance, the city is willing to waive the public ' provement assessments for the development. Density Bonuses. , The site of the Fairview Townhomes is an R-1 'Single and Two Family Residential District. To allow for the much higher density of multiple townhomes on one lot, the city will approve the re -zoning of the property to R-3. These density bonuses allowed more units on the property thus reducing the per unit land and improvement costs. Reduced Setbacks. If necessary, the city is willing to reduce needed setbacks for the Fairview Townhomes. Decreased Road Widths. The city will allow the utilization of private roads into the development property to access the townhome units. Typically public roads would have widths of 32' to 36' 204 Shamrock Drive • Arlington, MN 55307 507/964-2378 • Fax: 507/964-5973 • E-mail: arling@frontiemet.net ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ' July 20, 2004 Page 2 within a 50' or 60' right-of-way. By allowing the use of the private roads, the width is reduced to approximately 24' with no required right-of-way. Flexibility of Development Standards & Code Requirements. The city will be flexible in its development standards within the R-3 zoning along with flexibility within the code requirements ' for the Fairview Townhomes. Fast-track Permitting & Approval. Fairview Townhomes will be required to meet all building ' code requirements. Timing can be essential for the success of a project and the city and its building official will, to the best of their abilities, work with owner to allow for fast-track permitting approvals. As has been previously stated, the City of Arlington is committed to the development and completion of work force housing within the city. As part of our cooperatively developed plan and agreement to complete this, we support the Fairview Townhome development. We ask that you participate with us to help meet our common goal of affordable housing in the City of Arlington by funding this development. Sincerely, David Czech Mayor RL CEIVE_0 J1;L 2 12004 City of Arlington July 19, 2004 Minnesota Mousing Finance Agen�y ` 400 Sibley-StFeet, Suite 300 k. 5101-1998 . j St -Maul, Minnesota\5✓ !` . � 1 r . RE: Fairview Townho es ` i I t _r Arlington, Minnesota F1 (,ijtj ancc] PIM1i++ Communijy f i Dear MultiftmilyDeevropment: ksinq to<]r4114>1n (J101y 1, , The Arlin Cly \Couilc' at�eeting held o_ n July 6, 2004, has reviewed and endorsed the h9usin\11g deve en'4 gYosdd for tl}e F ' ownhomes, which proposes, twe townhomes wiin the C' o lington This endorsem is basupon the ndinks that the project willl meflocatl}f identified ho 'ing a and th&erosedo rs uy short supply'in thelopal 1 housingmarket. " " ' JR ( / �.- The City Council's endors me i eir ap roval ofYZesolution No. 11-2004, a copy of which is ched tO 7 i Sincerely, David Czech Mayor 204 Shamrock Drive • Arlington, MN 55307 507/9642378 • Fax: 507/964-5973 • E-mail: arling@frontiemet.net CITY OF ST. JOSEPH WW W.cityo(stt'oseph.com July 19, 2004 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Administrdtor 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 Judy Weyrens St. Paul MN 55101-1998 Ldrry 1. Hosch Re: Morningside Townhomes Box St. Joseph, Minnesota Councilors Phone 3zo.367 AI Rasser Dear Multifamily Development: Ross Rieke Gary Utsch Dale Wick The St. Joseph City Council on July 15, 2004 endorsed the housing development proposed by Sand Companies entitled Morningside Townhomes. The proposed development includes thirty-two Townhomes within the City of St. Joseph. This endorsement is based upon the findings that the project will meet locally identified housing needs and the proposed housing is in short supply in the local housing market. This is evidenced by a housing study prepared in 2001 by Admark Resources. Evidence of the City endorsement is evident when reading the attached letter of support. The City would not have approved the financial relief in building permit fees or park dedication fee nor would they support variance from the design standards of the newly revised St. Joseph Code of Ordinances if the project were not needed. Sincerely, CITY OF ST. JOSEPH Larry Hosch Mayor tzf College Avenue North . PO Box 668 Saint. Joseph, Minnesota 16374 Phone 3zo.367 7z01 I'dx 3zo.363.0342 I 1 CITY OF ST. JOSEPH vvm.cityof stjoseph.corn 1 1 July 19, 2004 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 1 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 Administrator St. Paul MN 55101-1998 Judy Weyrens 1 RE: Morningside Townhomes Mayor St. Joseph, Minnesota Larry 1. Hosch 1 Dear Multifamily Development: Councilors AI Rawer On behalf of the City of St. Joseph I would like to thank you in advance for consideration of Ross Rieke 1 the tax credit application of Sand Companies to develop a moderate income housing Gary Utsch development. Like most communities, the City of St. Joseph is experiencing considerable Dele Wick growth. Part of managing growth is to assure that housing is available for all ages and 1 incomes, commonly labeled Life Cycle Housing. The concern for Life Cycle Housing in the St. Cloud Area became a focal point in 2002. 1 During that time five St. Cloud area cities (St. Cloud, Waite Park, Sartell, Sauk Rapids, St. Joseph) collectively met and executed a Joint Powers Agreement whereby each City agreed to require 15% of new housing stock to meet the definition of affordable housing. To assist 1 the Cities with implementation, an outside agency has been hired. This agency coordinates quarterly meetings of the Cities, assists with marketing the affordable homes, provides gap financing to qualified buyers and prepares an annual report. St. Joseph is committed to the 1 goals and objectives outlined in the Joint Powers Agreement. In April of 2004 the City was presented with a concept plan prepared by Sand Companies for the development of an area known as Morningside Acres. The proposed development included single family homes and a portion labeled "Rental Life Cycle Housing". The Rental Life Cycle Housing is defined as housing where the rent is no greater than 30% of the monthly income of households earning 65% or less of the area median income, adjusted for ' the size of the unit, as specified and periodically updated by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Rental Life Cycle Housing Units (entitled Morningside Townhomes) will maintain the aforementioned income levels for a period of not less than ' 15 years. The Rental Life Cycle Housing project presented by Sand Companies meets the requirements as stated in the Joint Powers Agreement providing needed affordable housing for the area. ' The City of St. Joseph recognizes the increasing cost of new construction, and further recognizes that these costs limit the ability of developers to provide affordable housing. Just as developers are limited financially, so are cities. St. Joseph is committed to the provision of Affordable Housing, and offers the following m support of the Morningside Townhomes: zs College Avenue North • PO Box 668 • Saint. Joseph, Minnesota s6374 Phone 3zo.363.7zot I'ax 3zo.363.0342 ' July 19, 2004 t Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Page — 2 — ' Waiver of Plan Review Fee: Every building permit for the City of St. Joseph is charged a Plan Review Fee which is equal to 10% of the Building Permit Fee. This fee is assessed to ensure that each building meets the State Building Code and St. Joseph Code of Ordinances. The process will still be completed, ' but the fee for that service will be waived resulting is a City contribution of approximately $ 70.00 per unit or $ 2,240.00. ' Waiver of Park Dedication Fee: The City of St. Joseph requires all developments to connect to the St. Joseph Park and Trail System. This fee is part of the Park Dedication Fee but calculated separately. Based on an estimate, the Council waived $ 9,617 of the connection fee. ' Increased Density: The area known as Morningside Acres is located in Planning District 13 of the St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan. This area was identified for Single Family Development. The City Council and Planning Commission unanimously approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to allow for t increased density and multiple family zoning. This amendment was significant, as the Comprehensive Plan has only been adopted for one year. Without seeing the plan, there was hesitancy to amend the Plan as it was just adopted. However, after reviewing the development plan of Sand Companies the hesitancy ' disappeared Reduced Setbacks, The Planning Commission has reviewed the plat for Morningside Acres and t acknowledged that certain setback requirements cannot be met. Therefore, the Planning Commission authorized the public hearing for variance of the rear -yard setback. Without the variance the density would be reduced. The Planning Commission encouraged the application for variance so the additional ' housing units will be available. Relief from Design Standards: St. Joseph spent considerable time and resource revising the Zoning and ' Subdivision Ordinance. In this review, the Subdivision Ordinance was amended prohibiting private streets, requiring all buildings to front a public street and imposed setback requirements from holding ponds and wetland areas. Based on the submitted plan, a variance will be needed from the same design standards amended. However, the ability to provide Life Cycle Housing is important enough to grant the needed variances. Private Streets: As stated above the proposed development includes use of private streets. In a typical ' subdivision streets are platted with a width 66', paving a width of 36'. In an effort to reduce the road costs, the City is allowing the use of private streets with a width of 24' and no additional right-of-way. EMPAiMey of Process: The City recognizes that timing of projects is essential. The normal platting process in the City typically extends over a three month period. Typically if a deadline is missed, the plat is held back until the next meeting date. However, with regard to Morningside Acres, the City allowed the plat to move forward prior to having all the final documents and considered the plat within a 30 day period. As stated throughout this letter, St. Joseph is committed to providing Life Cycle Housing and demonstrated this commitment by working with the developer to reduce construction costs through both ' July 19, 2004 ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Page -3 — ' financial concession and relief of design standards. On behalf of the City of St. Joseph, I would respectfully request that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency consider this as a worthwhile project, as does St. Joseph, and fund the Morningside Townhome Development. ' Sincerely, ' CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ' Larry Hosch Mayor # Gateway Place A Mufti f ami[N Living CommunitN Attachment N MHFA Scoring Worksheet tSCI Sand Companies, Inc camp. Proper VO # Dm� (320) 202-3100 Waite Park, Minnesota wwmSand(7 mpaniesxc MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY ' 2006 HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM SELF -SCORING WORKSHEET FOR SELECTION POINTS Development Name: Address: City ' To be eligible for selection considerations of MHFA administered tax credits from the State's volume cap under the MHFA Oualified Allocation Plan, a developer must demonstrate that the project is eligible for not less than 30 points Please indicate below the selection and/or preference priority points expected for your development. Where multiple points per section are available please check the appropriate box (G) for points claimed. The MHFA will determine actual selection points used, based on the application and additional documentation you have submitted to justify the points claimed. (Attach separate details sheet). Please Note: If submitting an electronic version of the application, you must also submit a signed original paper Self -Scoring Worksheet ' for Selection Points (HTC Form 10) with your application package. The scores reflected on both submissions must be identical. You must also be sure both sheets identically reflect all supporting detail information as called for on the sheets. Only the signed original Self - Scoring Worksheet for Selection Points that accompanies the application will be reviewed and considered as the controlling document. Do not claim points unless documentation is provided along with the application to justify the points claimed. ' Please Note: Deed Restricted Covenants covering the rent restrictions and occupancy requirements presented at selection will be placed on the building(s) at the time of allocation. ROUND 1— MINIMUM THRESHOLD REQUIREMENTS For applications submitted in Round 1 all applicants statewide must meet one of the following threshold types. If you are applying to Round 1, please indicate the Threshold item you meet: a. In the Metropolitan Area: 1. ❑ New construction or substantial rehabilitation in which, for the tern of the extended use period (term of the Declaration of ' Land Use Restrictive Covenants), at least 75 percent of the total tax credit units are single room occupancy units which are affordable to households whose income does not exceed 30 percent of the area median income. 2. ❑ New Construction or substantial rehabilitation family housing projects that are not restricted to persons 55 years old or older in which, for the term of the extended use period (tern of the Declaration of land Use Restrictive Covenants), at least 75 ' percent of the total tax credit units contain two or more bedrooms and at least one-third of the 75 percent contain three or more bedrooms; or 3. ❑ Substantial rehabilitation projects in neighborhoods targeted by the city for revitalization. tb. Outside the Metropolitan Area: L ❑ Projects which meet a locally identified housing need and which are in short supply in the local housing market as ' evidenced by credible data such as local council resolution submitted with the application. (For Threshold Letter— Sample Format, see HTC Procedural Manual, Reference Materials Index.) c. Projects that are not restricted to persons of a particular age group and in which, for the term of the extended use period (term of the Declaration of land Use Restrictive Covenants), a percentage of the units are set aside and rented to persons: 1. ❑ with a serious and persistent mental illness as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 245.462, Subdivision 20, paragraph (c); 2. ❑ with a developmental disability as defined in United States Code, Title 42, Section 6001, paragraph (5), as amended; ' 3. ❑ who have been assessed as drug dependent persons as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 254A.02, Subdivision 5, and are receiving or will receive care and treatment services provided by an approved treatment program as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 254A.02, Subdivision 2; ' 4. ❑ with a brain injury as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 256B.093, Subdivision 4, paragraph (a); or 5. ❑ with permanent physical disabilities that substantially limit major life activities, if at least 50 percent of the units in the project are accessible as provided under Minnesota Rules chapter. 1340; ' d. ❑ Projects, whether or not restricted to persons of a particular age group, which preserve existing subsidized housing, if the use of tax credits is necessary to (1) prevent conversion to market rate use or (2) to remedy physical deterioration of the project which would result in loss of existing federal subsidies; or ' e. ❑ Projects financed by Rural Development, which meet statewide distribution goals. ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 1 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program onnc ..... w,..�.r.em Selection Priorities Developer Claimed MHFA Awarded 1. Large Family Housing 10 Points The proposal is for a project that provides family housing that is not restricted to persons 55 years old or older. At least 75 percent of the total tax credit units must contain two or more bedrooms. The tenant selection plan must give preference to families with minor children. To receive these points, the project must meet HTC Design Standards including the design requirements for Large Family Housing. Compliance must be evidenced by, a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect. Note: If points are claimed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the selection priority categories of Single Room Occupancy Housing or Special Populations. 2. Single Room Occupancy Housing 10 Points At least 50% of the total tax credit units must be one bedroom or less with rents affordable to households whose incomes do not exceed 30 percent of AMI. Scores based on gross rent level including utilities fore rental assistance. Eligible units must have rents affordable to households whose incomes do not exceed 30 percent of median income without rental assistance. To receive these points, the project must meet the HTC Design Standards and be evidenced by a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect. Note: If points are claimed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the selection priority categories of Large Family Housing or Special Populations. 3. Strategically Targeted Resources 10 To 12 Points ❑ The proposal is for the rehabilitation of an existing structure 10 points Note that for all HTC Rehabilitation proposals: the amount of rehabilitation must exceeds: (a) $5,000 per low-income unit for the project; and the greater of (b) $3,000 qualified basis per low-income unit per building; or (c) 10 percent of the adjusted basis. A qualified preservation project that receives full points for "Preserved Federally Assisted Low Income Housing" may qualify if rehabilitation exceeds the greater of (b) or (c) above. Calculation is based on rehabilitation hard costs and cannot include intermediary costs or soft costs identified in the application; plans and/or scope of work provided at time of application. ❑ The rehabilitation proposal is part of a community revitalization or stabilization plan. 2 additional points Must be evidenced by a letter from the city verifying that the proposed project is part of an approve community revitalization area as established by resolution or other legal action. -OR- The proposal is for new construction and will utilize existing sewer and water lines without substantial extensions. 10 Points To receive these points, the project must meet the HTC Design Standards and be evidenced by a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 2 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Fom 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program InnL GnX_Gcn.inn Wnr4chm, Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 4. Special Populations 3 or 10 Points Projects that are not restricted to persons of a particular age group and in which, for the term of the extended use period (Declaration of land Use Restrictive Covenants), a percentage of the units are set aside and rented to persons with the following disabilities: (a) a serious and persistent mental illness as defined in Minn. Stat § 245.462, subdivision 20, paragraph (c); a developmental disability as defined in United States Code, Title 42, Section 6001, paragraph (5), as amended; (c) assessed as drug dependent as defined in Minn. Stat § 254A.02, subdivision 5, and are receiving or will receive care and treatment services provided by an approved treatment program as defined in Minn. Stat § 254A.02, Subdivision 2. (d) a brain injury as defined in Minn. Stat § 25613.093, Subdivision 4, paragraph (a); or (e) permanent physical disabilities that substantially limit major life activities, if at least 50 percent of the units in the project are accessible as provided under Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1340. ❑ A project in which at least 50 percent of the total units are set aside and rented to such persons: /0points -OR- El A project in which at least 15 percent ojthe total units are set aside and rented to such persons 3 points If a proposal sets aside a percentage of units for persons with disabilities, the applicant must contact the human services department for the county where the project will be located to discuss the proposal. The applicant must obtain a letter from the human services department indicating that its staff has reviewed the proposed project, and stating whether there is a need for such housing and if the project would be eligible for funds to assist with the social service needs of the residents. In addition, if the project will be delivering supportive services to residents in these units, the proposal must include documentation describing: the scope of services residents will require, specific services the project will offer, whether the applicant will be responsible for delivery or will partner with identified organisations (and if so the status of those arrangements and partners' credentials), specific sources that will fund the services and their commitment status, and how residents will be connected to the services. To receive these points, the project must meet the HTC Design Standards and be evidenced by a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect. Note: If points are claimed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the selection priority categories of Large Family Housing or Single Room Occupancy Housing 5. Economic Integration 2 Points Two (2) Points will be awarded for the election of 25-50 percent of units affordable to households with rents at or below 60 percent of the area median income to the total units (not including full-time manager r model units) in the project: The corresponding HTC applicable fraction will be based on the number of HTC low income units to total and will be enforced at the time the Carryover Allocation and IRS Form 8609 are prepared to determine e maximum tax credit allocation for the project. ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 3 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Fon, 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5{2005 Housing Tax Credit Program In.. Ca1F_Ccn.im Wn�YcAm, Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 6. Cooperatively Developed Plan 5 or 10 Points City comprehensive plans alone do not qualify for the options below. ❑ The proposal is created in accordance with a comprehensive cooperatively developed plan that encompasses housing plus services and/or economic related initiatives. - 10 points Eligible plans include: • Saint Paul - Ramsey County Five -Year Low Income Housing and Homeless Services Plan; • Minneapolis Hennepin County Homeless Plan or other plans that include housing plus services and/or economic development initiatives -OR- ❑ The proposal is created in accordance with a cooperatively developed plan, which incorporates housing initiatives. - 5 points At a minimum, any combination of the above must have the input of the following entities: • City or county (or instrumentality thereof) OR • Regional Unit of Government AND one or more of the following: • Neighborhood and/or community group • Housing provider • Funders 7. Project Location 5 or 10 Points The proposed housing is needed to increase or sustain the supply of affordable housing in counties that experience both job and population growth during the last ten years. ❑ The proposed housing is located in one of the top ten job or population growth -10 points ❑ The proposed housing is located in one of the top twenty, but not in the top ten, job or population growth counties — 5 points (See Reference Materials Index— Project Location —for a Iist of cities) 8. Cost Avoidance / Cost Reduction 1 to 10 Points One or more of the following: (One point for each box checked, with a maximum of 10 points) ❑ Land donation of the development site ❑ Monetary/in-kind work and material donations ❑ Donation or waiver of development specific assessments or infrastructure costs ❑ Density bonus ❑ Reduced setbacks ❑ Reduced parking requirements ❑ Decreased road widths ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency a of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 512005 Housing Tax Credit Grogram -nna cwr_c.,..:.... Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded (Selection Priority 8. continued) ❑ Flexibility in site development standards ❑ Flexibility in zoning code requirements ❑ wAC/SAC reductions ❑ Fast-track permitting and approval ❑ Innovative building techniques or materials Provide specific cost savings amounts and details to justify points claimed If land donation of the development site, monetary/in-kind work and materials donations, or donation/waiver of development specific assessments or infrastructure costs are claimed for points in this section, it cannot also be claimed in the selection points category of Local Contributions. Assistance from the MHFA Super RFP and related Funding Partners i.e. Family Housing Fund, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentive Account, IS NOT eligible for inclusion in this section To receive these points, documentation of the terms and conditions of a cost avoidance/cost reduction measure must be provided from the contributor of the assistance or authorized local official, at e time of the application. The documentation shall be in the form of a development specific letter of intent, city or council resolution, letter of approval, statement of agreement or eligibility, or memorandum of understanding. If the documentation provided contains words synonymous with "consider" or "may", (as in "may award") regarding the cost avoidance/cost reduction measure, the points will not be awarded. Documentation from an engineer, architect or certified contractor or provider for innovative wilding techniques or materials must be submitted at the time of application and be reviewed and approved by the Agency to be eligible for the points. The applicant must provide accurate, complete and credible evidence of the amount of cost savings for each cost avoidance/cost reduction measure and record the savings in Section VII E. of the MF Application Form The value of the donations and in—kind contributions must be consistent with current market comparable costs for land, materials and services 9. Local Contributions 2 to 10 Points ❑ The proposal is receiving funds from an area employer. — 4 points. ❑ I The proposal is receiving funds from the local municipality. — 4 points Funds from local municipalities may include, for example: • Tax increment financing • Reservation land not subject to local property taxes • Historic tax credits • Monetary grants • Tax abatement • Land donation of the development site ❑ The proposal receives funds from a private philanthropic group, religious organization, or charitable organization. - 2 points Provide specific details to justify points claimed If land donation of the development site, monetary/in-kind work and material donations, or donation/waiver of development specific assessments or infrastructure costs is claimed for points in this section, it cannot also be claimed in the selection points category of Cost Avoidance/Cost Reduction. ---------------- ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 5 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing T" Credit Program lM4 GnM�Gnnnnn Wn.1.eFne, Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded (Selection Priority 9. continued) To qualify for points using historic credits and tax abatement, there must be satisfactory documentation that the resource will provide additional positive investment capital to the development that will reduce the demands on the state and federal housing resources. For tax increment financing to qualify for points, there must be satisfactory documentation that the resource is committed to the development at the time of application. Documentation of the amount and the terms of assistance must be provided by the provider of e assistance at the time of application in the form of a development specific letter of intent. The value of e donations must be consistent with current market comparable costs for materials and services. Within 6 months of the date of selection (MHFA Board selection date) the applicant must provide the MHFA with documentation of a firm commitment, authorization or approval of the local contribution(s). The documentation must state the amount, terms and conditions and be executed or approved at a minimum by the contributor. Documentation containing words synonymous with "consider" or `may", (as in "may award') regarding the contribution, will not be considered acceptable. Lack of acceptable documentation 71 result in the reevaluation and adjustment of the tax credits or RFP award, up to and including the total recapture of tax credits or RFP funds. 10. Leverage 2 to 10 Points Dints are awarded for leveraging requested state deferred funding with funding from private, federal, local government, religious, philanthropic, or charitable organizations. The formula used to determine the Leverage Ratio Percentage is based upon the cumulative state deferred funding award (including current request) for MHFA RFP funds* divided by Total Development Cost. *(including past and present MHFA and Funding Partners [i.e. Family Housing Fund, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentive Account] awards and current requests) and excluding First Mortgage, Syndication, HOME, MARIF funds). Total state RFP/Funding Partner Funds awarded and current request S_ divided by Total Development Cost $ equals Leverage Ratio %. ❑ 0-20%= 10 pts ❑ 21-30%= 8 pts ❑ 3140%= 6 pts ❑ 41-50%= 4 pts ❑ 51-60%= 2 pts ❑ 61 and above = 0 pts Documentation of the amount and the terms of assistance must be provided from the provider of the assistance at the time of application in the form of a development specific letter of intent. Within 6 months of the date of selection (MHFA Board selection date), the applicant must provide the MHFA with documentation of a firm commitment for each funding source. The documentation must state the amount, terms and conditions and be executed or approved by the lender or contributor and the applicant. Documentation containing words synonymous with "consider" or "may", (as in "may award") regarding e commitment will not be considered acceptable. Lack of acceptable documentation will result in the reevaluation and adjustment of the tax credits or RFP award, up to and including the total recapture of tax edits or RFP funds. ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 6 of Is (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 11. Readiness to Proceed 2 to 10 Points The MHFA shall award points to applicants who have secured funding commitments for funding for one or more funding sources at the time of application (commitments for funding from MHFA and Funding Partners (i.e. Family Housing Fund, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentive Account) are only included if obtained in a previous funding cycle/round). The documentation must state the amount, terms and conditions and be executed or approved by the lender or contributor and the applicant. Documentation containing words synonymous with "consider" or "may", (as in "may award') regarding the commitment will not be considered acceptable. (Excludes current funding round requests for Syndication Proceeds and First Mortgage Financing) Total eligible funding secured, awarded or committed $_ Divided by Total Development Cost $_ equals Percentage of Funds Committed _%. ❑ 60% or more of funding secured, awarded or committed 10 points ❑ 30a/o to 59.9% of funding secured, awarded or committed 6 points ❑ 10% to 29.9% of funding secured awarded or committed 2 point ❑ 9.9% and below of funding secured, awarded or committed 0 points 12. Intermediary Costs (Soft Costs) I. to 6 Points Points will be given to projects with the lowest intermediary costs on a sliding scale based on percentage of total development costs. For HTC selected projects, this percentage will be enforced at issuance of the IRS Form 8609. '(in 2004 Total Mortgageable Costs were in effect) Intermediary cost amount: $_ divided by Total Development' Costs $ Equals Intermediary Percentage _% ❑ 0.0-15% 6 points ❑ 15.1-20a/o 3 points ❑ 20.1-25% 2 points ❑ 25.1-300% 1 point ❑ 30.1%& over 0 points 13. Unacceptable Practices -10 to -25 Points MHFA will impose penalty points for unacceptable practices as identified in Section N.F. of the Housing Tax Credit Procedural Manual. 14. Eventual Tenant Ownership 1 Point The proposal incorporates a financially viable plan to transfer 100 percent of the HTC unit ownership at e end of the 15_veaz compliance period from the initial ownership entity (or MHFA approved "Transfer of Ownership") of the project (the Limited Partnership) to tenant ownership. The unit purchase price at time of sale must be affordable to incomes meeting HTC eligibility requirements. To be eligible, the buyer must have an HTC qualifying income at the time of initial occupancy (HTC rental tenant) or time of purchase. The plan must incorporate a Limited Partnership ownership exit strategy and the provision of services including home ownership education and training. The Declaration of land Use Restrictive Covenants will contain provisions ensuring compliance with ase home ownership program commitments by the Limited Partnership Owner. (Refer also to Section V. W. of the HTC Procedural Manual for additional information.) Until the time the HTC units are purchased by a qualified tenant or in the event the HTC units are not acquired by a qualified tenant, the owner will extend the duration of low-income use for the full extended use period (30 years). The owner therefore, agrees to waive provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)(i)(H) and 42(h)(6)(F) and extends the duration of low-income use of the project to a minimum of 30 years. ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency r of 15 (HTC Fom 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program 9nn6 <nl6cm.inn wn.Ye6mr Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 15. Underserved Populations 3 to 10 Points The development serves an underserved population as defined by the Agency as Single Female head of household with minor children, Individuals and Households of Color and one of the following is true: ❑ Marketing efforts or project design features will be used that will attract underserved populations (as defined by the Agency) including collaborations and partnerships proposed with members or organizations addressing the needs of underserved populations? 3 points OR ❑ Marketing efforts or project design features will be used that will attract underserved populations (as defined by the Agency) including collaborations and partnerships proposed with members or organizations addressing the needs of underserved populations; and the applicant has past successful experiences in marketing to or working with underserved populations? ❑ 1 Underserved Population = 5 points ❑ 2 Underserved Population= 10 points (NOTE: see selection priority #4 for Disabled Individuals) 16. Temporary Priority 3 Points The proposal addresses a temporary housing priority and is eligible for the award of points by the Commissioner or the Board of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency pursuant to authority cited in the Permanent Rules of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. 17. Preservation of Existing Housing Tax Credit Units 10 Points [IMPORTANT NOTE: THESE POINTS ARE AVAILABLE ONLY TO EXISTING MHFA TAX CREDIT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR TAX CREDITS FROM MHFA'S COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION PROCESS (CONSOLIDATED RFP) and QUALIFIED TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR A PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM MHFA AS THE CREDIT ALLOCATOR. To obtain the related points, the existing tax credit housing must meet the following criteria: 1. The development received an MHFA allocation of housing tax credits either prior to 1990 or is eligible to and will exercise their option under the provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)(i)(I1) and 42(hx6XF) within the next 12 months; and 2. Applicant agrees to maintain the Housing Tax Credit Units in the development for at least 30 years; and 3. The proposal will not result in the displacement of existing low and moderate income residents; and 4. Units must be considered at risk of going to market rents, where the market rents of comparable units exceed the tax credit rent limits by 10 percent and the proposed rents will increase by more than 30 perces within two years of the Housing Tax Credit Application date. The risk of conversion must be supported y information contained in the application and with final determinations made by MHFA; or 5. Tax credit units would no longer remain decent, safe, and affordable due to physical deterioration or deterioration of capacity of current ownership/management entity. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency a of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program InnC Cul!_Cmrinn WnrLcAm' Selection Priorities Developer NIHFA Claimed Awarded 18. Permanent Housing for Individuals Experiencing Long Term Homelessness (5 to 110 Points) MHFA Competitive Round, Non -Tax Exempt Points ('bonus" points) 100 Points MHFA Competitive Round or Tax Exempt Points ("non -Bonus" points) 5 or 10 Points MPORTANTNOTE: THE 100 "BONUS" POINTS ARE AVAILABLE ONLY TO QUALIFIED PERMANENT HOUSING PROJECTS TARGETING INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCING LONG TERM HOMELESSNESS APPLYING FOR TAX CREDITS FROM MHFA'S COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION PROCESS (CONSOLIDATED RFP) QUALIFIED TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR A PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM MHFA AS THE CREDIT ALLOCATOR WILL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM AWARD OF 10 POINTS ("NON -BONUS" POINTS) FROM THIS POINT CATEGORY. QUALWING PROPOSALS MUST CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF 4 UNITS SERVING HOMELESS HOUSEHOLDS. A proposal which is awarded scoring points from this category and is selected to receive tax credits will be required to comply with the Long Term Homelessness reporting requirements as defined by the MHFA. The Tax Credit Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants, including a specific Rider to the Declaration will contain performance requirements related to these Long Term Homelessness units and will he recorded with the property. The 100 points ("bonus points") will be available until a total of $1,452,000* (estimated 25 percent MHFA authority) in tax credits are awarded for qualifying proposals for Persons Experiencing Long Term Homelessness selected in the 2006 Housing Tax Credit competitions. Once this maximum amount is reached, the 100 points ("bonus" points) will no longer be awarded to qualified proposals for the remaining 2006 Tax Credit Program competitive funding round. Qualified proposals may earn a maximum of 10 points ("non -bonus" points cited below) and may continue to compete in the appropriate set aside. The MHFA will promote housing for households experiencing long-term homelessness by giving preference points to proposals that meet all the following conditions: a) sets aside a percentage of housing tax credit units to (minimum 4 units) serve households experiencing long-term homelessness as proposed to be defined in Minnesota Rule, Chapter 4900.3705; b) addresses an unmet need and fits with the Continuum of Care goals and action steps intended to address homelessness as identified in the Exhibit I Plan Housing Gaps Analysis and described i the Continuum of Care Narrative submitted to HUD; c) provides an acceptable plan for resident support services (i.e. information and referral, advocacy, case management, self-reliance training, resident association and community building activities) contingent upon an agreement with an established organization providing such services to residents and financial plans demonstrating feasibility; d) provides a service budget which supports the plan; e) provides an executed memorandum of understanding between the owner, lead service provider and property management which outlines the duties and responsibilities of each, and; f) the applicant agrees to pursue and continue renewal of rental assistance, operating subsidy, or service funding contracts for as long as the funding is available. ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 9 of is (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit program IMF Gdr_Grn.inn Wn.Le1.nN Selection Priorities Developer Claimed NWA Awarded (Selection Priority 18. continued) Additional points ("non -bonus" points) will be awarded to a proposal in which a certain percentage Points are not Points are not (rounded up to the next full unit) of the total units are set aside and rented to household experiencing To be eligible for selection considerations of MHFA administered tax credits under the MHFA awarded for this item. long term homelessness: Qualified Allocation Plan, one of the minimum requirements is that a proposal maintain Section 42 income and rental restrictions for aperiod of 30 years beginning with the first day of the compliance period in which the building is a part of a qualified low-income housing project Points are no longer 5% to 10%, but no fewer than 4 units = 5 points. 42(h)(6)(F) and extend the duration of low-income use of the nroiect The owner agrees that the provisions of Section 42(h)(6XE)(i)(H) and 42(h)(6)(F) (which provision 50 % to 1000/6, but no fewer than 20 units = 10 points. would permit the owner to terminate the restrictions under this agreement at the end of the compliance To receive points under this category, an applicant is required to complete and submit with the period in the event the MHFA does not present the owner with a qualified contract for the acquisition of application materials, the Narratives, Forms and Submissions outlined in Part F of the Supportive the project) do not apply to the project, and that the Section 42 income and rental restrictions shall apply Housing Section of the Housing Resource Application Guide and Checklist Materials include, but not for the period of 30 years beginning with the first day of the compliance period in which the building is limited to, a plan outlining the services to be provided, a budget to support the plan, and such other a part of a qualified low income housing project The primary financing proposed must meet MHFA's items as are required by the MHFA for applications serving persons experiencing long-term underwriting standards or demonstrate to the sole satisfaction of the MHFA that the project can remain homelessness. financially feasible for the entire 30 -year duration of low income use. The MHFA recognizes that rental assistance, or operating subsidies, and supportive services may be necessary to effectively serve households experiencing Long-term homelessness. In the event that necessary rental assistance, operating support or tenant service funding is withdrawn or terminated due to reasons not attributable to the actions or inactions of the owner and alterative funding is unavailable, the owner may petition MHFA, in writing, for the termination or modification of the requirement that the assisted units be occupied by households Experiencing Long -Term Homelessness. MHFA will consider the petition and may relax or eliminate the requirement for Supportive Services or may eliminate the requirement that the assisted units be occupied by Households Experiencing Long -Term Homelessness. A development that is in full compliance with all the terms of the funding may be permitted to phase out the targeting of tax credit units to persons experiencing Long-term homelessness and convert the rents to the 50% tax credit rent limit without jeopardizing the tax credit allocation. The 50% tax credit rent limit for these units must be maintained for the remainder of the tax credit compliance period and extended use period to retain the tax credit allocation. 19. High Speed Internet Access 1 Point The development will provide High Speed Internet access via installation of all appropriate cable and connections to every unit in the development. This will be a design requirement if points are taken. Preference Priorities Developer Claimed MHFA Awarded 1. Extended Duration (New for 2006) All proposals must maintain the duration of low-income use for a minimum of 30 years Points are not Points are not To be eligible for selection considerations of MHFA administered tax credits under the MHFA awarded for this item. awarded for this item. Qualified Allocation Plan, one of the minimum requirements is that a proposal maintain Section 42 income and rental restrictions for aperiod of 30 years beginning with the first day of the compliance period in which the building is a part of a qualified low-income housing project Points are no longer awarded to tomiects where the owner agrees to waive provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)(i)(II) and 42(h)(6)(F) and extend the duration of low-income use of the nroiect The owner agrees that the provisions of Section 42(h)(6XE)(i)(H) and 42(h)(6)(F) (which provision would permit the owner to terminate the restrictions under this agreement at the end of the compliance period in the event the MHFA does not present the owner with a qualified contract for the acquisition of the project) do not apply to the project, and that the Section 42 income and rental restrictions shall apply for the period of 30 years beginning with the first day of the compliance period in which the building is a part of a qualified low income housing project The primary financing proposed must meet MHFA's underwriting standards or demonstrate to the sole satisfaction of the MHFA that the project can remain financially feasible for the entire 30 -year duration of low income use. ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 10 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program �flnc Cnli Crv,nnn WncLCAeM Preference Priorities Developer Claimed MHFA Awarded 2. Serves Lowest Income Tenants/Rent Reduction 5 to 13 Points Scores based on gross rent level including utilities before rental assistance. Eligible units must have rents affordable to households whose incomes do not exceed 30 percent or 50 percent of median income without ental assistance. In addition to the elected income limit of 50 percent or 60 percent AMI for the full term of the declaration (refer to the Minimum Set Aside), the applicant agrees to maintain deeper rent structuring for which lection points are requested. Units Representing _percent of the HTC units will have additional rent restrictions requiring Is affordable to households at 30 percent AMI (Rent Restrictions 30 percent) Units Representing _percent of the HTC units will have additional rent restrictions requiring rents affordable to households at 50 percent AMI (Rent Restrictions 50 percent) Applicants may choose either option 1 or 2, and at your choice, option 3 for the development. This selection will restrict rents only (tenant incomes will not be restricted to the 50 percent or 30 percent income level by claiming points in this section). ❑ Option 1- A project in which 100 percent of the HTC unit rents are at the county 50 percent HUD area median rent limit. (10 points) ❑ Option 2 - A project in which at least 50 percent of the HTC unit rents are at the county 50 percent HUD area median rent limit. (5 points) OR ❑ Option 3 -In addition to Option 1& 2, a project that further restricts 30 percent of the above Restricted units to the county 30 percent HUD area median rent limit. (additional 3 points) NOTE: If points are claimed / awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed / awarded from the selection priority category of Rental Assistance for the same units. ORTANT: All 50 percent rent restricted units must meet the 50 percent area median rent for a minimum of five years. After the first five year period has expired rent may be increased to the 60 percent rent limit over a three year period with increases not to exceed the amount listed in the table below All 30 percent rent restricted units must meet the 30 percent area median rent for a minimum of five years. After the first five-year period has expired rent may be increased to the 40 percent rent limit over a three-year period with increases not to exceed the amount listed in the table below. Year Rent Levels Rent Levels 1-5 30%of50% 30%of30% 6 30%of53% 30%of33% 7 30%of57% 30%of37% 8 30%of60% 300/6of400/6 MHFA will incorporate these restrictions into the project's Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants. The applicant must demonstrate to sole satisfaction of MHFA that the project can achieve these reduced rents and remain a financially feasible project, IRC 42(m)(2). Points are contingent upon financial plans demonstrating feasibility, positive cash flow on a 15 -year pro forma and gaining MWF management approval (for management, operational expenses, and cash flow assumptions). ------------------ ' Minnesota Housing Finance Agency n of 15 (MTC Fonn 10) MHR Fonn 310 Multifamlly Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program Inn(. Cvli_<rn.inn Wn�LeM1enf I 1 Preference Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 3. Preservation of Federally Assisted Units (Non -Tax Exempt, MHFA Credit Ceiling, Competitive Round Projects) 10 Points (Tax Exempt, Non-MHFA Credit Ceiling, Non-competitive Round Projects) 10 Points [IWORTANT NOTE THESE POINTS ARE AVAILABLE ONLY TO QUALIFYING NON -TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR TAX CREDITS FROM MHFA'S COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION PROCESS (CONSOLIDATED RFP) and QUALIFIED TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR A PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM MHFA AS THE CREDIT ALLOCATOR. (Provide specific details to justify points claimed) DEFINITION - Any housing receiving project based rental assistance, operating subsidies, or mortgage interest reduction payments. The universe includes public housing, Section 236 and Section 221(d)(3) interest reduction payments, and any development with a project based Section 8, rent supplement, or rental assistance payments contract Preserves federally assisted low income housing which, due to mortgage prepayments or expiring rental assistance, would convert to market rate use or due to physical deterioration or deterioration of capacity of current ownership/management entity would lose its federal subsidies. MHFA, at its sole discretion, must agree that a market exists for a conversion to market rate housing. In order to obtain the related points, the federally assisted housing must meet the following criteria: 1 Units must be considered at risk of losing assistance within two years of the Housing Tax Credit Application date as supported by information contained in the application and with final determinations made by MHFA 2 Applicant must agree to continue renewals of existing project based housing subsidy payment contract for as long as the assistance is available. 3 Applicant must agree to maintain the Housing Tax Credit Units in the development for at least 30 ears. Except for "good cause", applicant must not evict existing subsidized residents and must continue to new leases for those residents. 4. QCT/Community Revitalization 1 Point point is awarded to projects that are located in a Qualified Census Tract (See Qualified Census Tract — Reference Materials Index) and are part of a concerted plan that provides for community revitalization. This must be evidenced by a letter from the city; verifying that the proposed project is part of an approved community revitalization area as established by resolution or other legal action. Minnesota Housing rinance Agency 12 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MMR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program Innf. Celf-CnnNnn Wn�l.e"nm Preference Priorities Developer Claimed MHFA Awarded 5. Rental Assistance 4 to 18 Points Priority is given to an owner that has entered into negotiations with a Local Housing Authority to receive Project Based Rental Assistance. The assisted units must be located in buildings on the project site. For he purpose of this section, if a proposal contains existing Project Based Assisted units, these units will be counted towards meeting required Rental Assistance percentages. Rent for assisted units must be at or below FMRs (or appropriate payment standard for the project area). Receiving these points and agreeing to a minimum number of assisted units does not release owners from their obligations under the Minnesota Human Rights Act and Section 42 prohibiting refusal to lease to the holder of a voucher or certificate of eligibility under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 because of the status of the prospective tenant as such a holder. A current request for MHFA HTF Rental Assistance will not receive rental assistance points. A past award or existing HTF Rental Assistance will be counted toward meeting required the Rental Assistance percentages. Indicate the applicable combinations of the below components. Points for A and B cannot be claimed in combination. ❑ (A) For developments agreeing to set aside at least 20 percent of the total units for project based rental assistance —10 points. ❑ (B) For developments agreeing to set aside at least 10 percent but under 20 percent of the total units for the project based rental assistance — 6 points. ❑ (C) For selected components A or B above, il; in addition, the above commitments are coupled with a commitment from the HRA to provided the project based assistance for a minimum 10 year contract term — 4 points. ❑ (D) For developments that cooperatively develop a housing plan to provide other rental assistance (e.g. Section 8, portable tenant based, HUD Operating Subsidy or other similar programs approved by the Agency) to meet the existing need as evidenced at application by a letter of intent signed by both the applicant and the local housing authority or other similar entities. — 4 points. NOTE: If points are claimed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the preference priority categories of Serves Lowest -Income Tenants/Rent Reduction for the same units. To receive these points, the applicant must comply with all program requirements for the assistance for which priority points were given, including maintaining rents within the appropriate payment standard for the project area in which the project is located for the full compliance and extended use period of the housing tax credits. For proposals claiming points for Project Based Rental Assistance, at the time of application, the applicant must submit a letter of intent signed by the Local Housing Authority. The letter of intent must establish that the Local Housing Authority: 1) is willing to commit the project based assistance to the proposed development; and. 2) will submit an application of HUD project based assistance; or 3) has sufficient project based authority available; or 4) has authority available to convert to project base units. As a condition of Carryover or 8609, whichever occurs first, the applicant must submit a copy of the fully executed HUD Approval for the project -based rental assistance to be included in the development. For Project Based Rental Assistance in conjunction with a commitment for an "extended term contract" by the HRA, in addition to the above HUD application, at time of application the applicant must submit a letter of intent to enter into the "extended term contract' for project based assistance for a minimum of 10 ears which is signed by the Local Housing Authority. As a condition of Carryover or 8609, whichever occurs first, the applicant must submit a fully executed copy of a copy of the HRA "extended term contract" for the project -based assistance to be included in the development. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 13 of 15 (HTC Farm 10) MHR Forrn 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 5/2005 Housing Tax Credit Program ,.n. <nlf_C�nnnn Wn.4cFen! Preference Priorities Developer Claimed VIHFFA Awarded (Preference Priority 5. continued) Housing Tu Credit Program ,nnc For Other Rental Assistance (e.g., Section 8, portable tenant based, HUD operating subsidy or other similar rent assistance programs approved by the Agency), at time of application the applicant must submit a letter of intent to develop a cooperative agreement which is signed by the applicant and Local Housing Authority along, with the completed Agreement to Utilize Public Housing and Section 8 Waiting Lists. As a condition of Carryover or 8609, whichever occurs first, the applicant must submit a fully executed copy of the cooperatively developed housing plan. TOTAL POINTS _ Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded ' 14 of 15 (HTC Fom110) MHR Form 310 5/2005 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Multifamily Housing Resource Housing Tu Credit Program ,nnc Under penalty of ueriury. Owner hereby certifies the information provided herein is true and accurate. Name of Owner: By: (Signature) Of.. Its: (Name of Legal Entity) (Title)(Managing General Partner) (Print or type name of signatory) Please Note: During the competition process, MI-IFA's review of the submitted scoring points worksheet is only to validate that the points claimed are eligible, to reduce points claimed if not eligible, and to determine points awarded. MHFA will not award additional points which are not initially claimed by the Applicant/Owner. Many performance obligations are created by the claiming of certain scoring points. As such, MFA cannot and will not assume the position of creating any such performance obligations on behalf of the Applicant/Owner. Also Note: Applications funded under the Joint Powers Agreement must also comply with the sub -allocators selection criteria defined in their Qualified Allocation Plan. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 15 of 15 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 512005 Housing T" Credit Program ,nn. uu—L -y ateway A Muf ti f ami(N Living CommunitN Attachment V 1 Sand Companies, Inc. Profile 1 *�IJVl Sand Companies, Inc. Com. F� %1� #D a. 1 (320) 202-3100 Waite Park, Minnesota wwweSandCo panie..co 1 #,ASCI Sand Companies, Inc. Construction 1 Property Management 1 Dodolmnent (320) 202-3100 Waite Park, Minnesota www.SandCompanies.com Company Profile January 1, 2005 Office Location: Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue Post Office Box 727 Waite Park, Minnesota 56387-0727 Telephone: (320) 202-3100 Facsimile: (320) 202-3139 Website: www.SandCompanies.com E-mail. SCI@SandCompanies.com SAND COMPANIES, INC. MISSION STATEMENT Our Mission Statement "Satisfying our client's needs by providing the highest quality products and services, by employing a dedicated team of the most talented, qualified professionals in our industry, whose hard work will prevail in every project they accomplish for our clients." SCI z SAND COMPANIES, INC. HISTORY 1 + Sand Companies, Inc. was established in 1991 by Leo M. Sand, ' along with an experienced team of innovators with well over 50 years of construction, property management and development knowledge to form one of the finest General Contracting, Property Management and Real ' Estate Development companies in the Midwest. They specialize in building and developing quality hotels, multifamily residential housing, commercial, retail and office buildings. ' In July of 1997, Leo M. Sand, Chief Executive Officer, became the sole owner of Sand Companies, Inc. In December of 1997, Sand ' Companies, Inc. purchased SCS Management, Inc., a full service, hotel management company. To accompany this venture, Sand Companies, Inc. started a rental housing management company in 1998. To better serve ' its clients and customers, Sand Companies, Inc. hired a staff Architect and CAD Drafter/Operator in October of 2003. The fully integrated process of design/development, construction ' and property management is completed by Sand Companies, Inc. They have the principle goal of reliable site selection and acquisition. They are responsible for market analysis, site selection, local government ' approvals, along with locating and arranging financing. Sand Companies, Inc. selects quality, reliable engineers, planners and designers to achieve their goal of customer satisfaction. They provide their own experienced project coordination, on-site supervision and excellent quality controls to complete each project on time and under budget. ' Sand Companies, Inc. is engaged in constant, extensive research for unsatisfied market areas. When a possible area is located, market trends are studied, feasibility analyses are completed and a complete ' examination of the competitors is considered. A great amount of time and effort is taken before a decision to move forward with a project is made. Possible projects are carefully analyzed through a series of t "checks and balances" while they are presented to the construction, development and management teams. Sand Companies, Inc. has earned a reputation for professionalism, ' thoroughness and proven results. With the combined talents and skills within their organization, a great amount of pride is taken in each and every project by all company personnel. Their team insures value by ' careful planning, cost containment, innovative ideas and completing a quality project. They take pride in delivering more than what the contract says. SAND COMPANIES, INC. VISION STATEMENT Our Vision Statement "A team of talented People dedicated to a common goal; to forge ahead, to succeed in building a better place to live and work." Leo M. Sand Chief Executive Officer :SCI SAND COMPANIES, INC. CORPORATE TEAM Leo M. Sand, Chief Executive Officer 26 years Construction, Property Management & Real Estate Development Experience Minnesota General Contractor's license - 27 years Minnesota Real Estate Broker's License - 18 years Started Sand Companies, Inc. in 1991 E-mail Address: LMSand@SandCompanies.com Jamie J. Thelen, President 9 years Real Estate Development & Management Experience 8 years Municipal Government Experience Minnesota Real Estate license - 8 years Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 1996 E-mail Address: JJThelen@SandCompanies.com Scott K Bailey, Chief Financial Officer 24 years as a Certified Public Accountant Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 2004 E-mail Address: SKBailev@SandCompanies.com Joyce A. Winter, Corporate Secretary 20 years Accounting & Management Experience Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 1993 E-mail Address: IAWinter@SandComnanies.com W 5 t SAND COMPANIES, INC. MANAGEMENT TEAM t+ Gene M. Walter, Vice President of Construction Operations ' 32 years Construction Experience Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 1993 tE-mail Address: GMWalter@SandCompanies.com ' Roger Gertken, Project Superintendent 18 years Construction Experience Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 1994 E-mail Address: RWGertken@SandComnanies.com ' Ted M. Lindberg, Senior Project Estimator ' 22 years Project Management/Estimating Experience Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 1995 E-mail Address: TMLindberg@SandCompanies.com Neil R. Fortier, Vice President of Management 15 years Management Experience Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 1997 E-mail Address: NRFortier@SandCompanies.com Jerry L. Burau, Special Projects Manager 30 years Management & Purchasing Experience Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 1998 E-mail Address: ILBurau@SandCompanies.com SCI 6 SAND COMPANIES, INC. MANAGEMENT TEAM Jim W. Sand, Vice President of Development/Risk Manager 29 years Property Management & Residential Real Estate Development Experience Minnesota Insurance License - 34 years Minnesota Real Estate Broker's License - 36 years Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 1998 E-mail Address: JWSand@SandCompanies.com Jean T. Sand, Compliance Manager 18 years Residential Management Experience Housing Credit Certified Professional (HCCP) - 3 years Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 1999 E-mail Address: JTSand@SandComnanies.com Richard A. Hennings, Senior Architect/VP of Construction 36 years Architectural Design & Drafting Experience 10 years Building Experience American Institute of Architects - 28 years Registered Architect in Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin & Idaho Joined Sand Companies, Inc.'s Team in 2003 E-mail Address: RAHenningsgSandCompanies.com SCI 7 ' SAND COMPANIES, INC. BANK REFERENCES 1 i American National Bank of Minnesota Mr. Terry Kurowski ' 3210 West Division, PO Box 7749 Branch President St. Cloud, MN 56302 Tel (320) 253-6568 Fax (320) 253-9045 ' Associated Bank Mr. Erik Schwegler 80 South 8th Street, Suite 266 Regional Manager ' Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel (612) 359-4469 www.AssociatedBank.com Fax (612) 359-4475 ' Central MN Federal Credit Union Mr. Rick Odenthal 20 South 4th Ave. East President ' Melrose, MN 56352 Tel (320) 256-4269 www.Centrabnnfcu.org Fax (320) 256-7519 ' State Bank of Long Lake Mr. Tom Johnson 1964 West Wayzata Blvd., PO Box 636 Vice President Long Lake, MN 55356-0636 Tel (888) 311-3880 ' www.sblonglake.com Fax (952) 473-0282 Home Federal Savings Bank Mr. Eric Oftedahl ' 425 East St. Germain Street, Suite 104 Vice President St. Cloud, MN 56304 Tel (320) 252-2797 www.justcaRhome.com Fax (320) 252-6516 Neighborhood National Bank Mr. Clark Bauldwin ' 803 North Nokomis NE, PO Box 129 President Alexandria, MN 56308 Tel (320) 763-8366 www.nnbnet.com Fax (320) 763-8367 ' MinnWest Bank Mr. Bill Anderson 4140 2nd Street South, PO Box 7429 Branch President ' St. Cloud, MN 56302-7429 Tel (320) 253-6300 www.minnwestbank.com Fax (320) 253-3134 SAND COMPANIES, INC. TRADE REFERENCES Trimpac, Inc. Mr. Mac McCarney PO Box 277 Tel (320) 202-3200 ' St Cloud, MN 56302 Fax (320) 202-3202 www.trimpaconhne.com ' JT Electric Service, Inc. Mr. Terry Oehrlein 34658 255th Avenue, PO Box 476 Tel (320) 845-4789 Albany, MN 56307 Fax (320) 845-4920 ' www.jtelectiicservice.com J-Berd Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Mr. Dave Berdan ' 3308 Southway Drive Tel (320) 656-0847 St. Cloud, MN 56301 Fax (320) 656-0312 ' Cemstone Concrete Solutions Mr. Thor Becken 2025 Centre Pointe Boulevard, Suite 300 Tel (651) 688-9292 Mendota Heights, MN 55120-1221 Fax (651) 688-0124 ' www.cemstone.com Otto Associates Mr. Marty Campion ' 9 West Division Tel (763) 6824727 Buffalo, MN 55313 Fax (763) 682-3522 www.ottoassociates.com ' Apollo Insurance Agency Mr. John Delinsky 28 11th Avenue South Tel (320) 253-1122 St. Cloud, MN 56301 Fax (320) 253-9969 ' www.apoHoinsurance.com Al's Ornamental Iron & Welding, Inc. Mr. Al Haus t 304 31st Avenue South Tel (320) 656-8851 Waite Park, MN 56387 Fax (320) 656-8860 ' AH Bennett Company Ms. Dawn Koskinen 1020 Lincoln Avenue Tel (800) 216-4831 Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 Fax (320) 255-1787 ' www.ahbennett.com Molin Concrete Products Mr. Dan Molin ' 415 Lilac Street Tel (800) 336-6546 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Fax (651) 786-0229 www.mohn.com 0 ' SAND COMPANIES, INC. CLIENT REFERENCES Tel (320) 685-7771 Cold Spring, MN 56320 Gorham Housing Partners Mr. Pat Gorham 841 East Forest Avenue Tel (320) 679-1632 Mora, MN 55051 Fax (320) 679-5574 Midwest Housing Group, LLC Mr. John Belisle ' 12315 Heather Avenue North Tel (651) 429-2445 Hugo, Minnesota 55308-8318 Fax (253) 295-2240 ' St. Cloud Housing Limited Partnership Mr. Stan Weinberger 609 Ninth Street North Tel (320) 252-4414 ' Sartell, MN 56377 Fax (320) 252-4482 Birchaven Village Mr. Jim Birchem 1633 Delton Avenue Tel (218) 444-1709 Bemidji, MN 56601 t Fax (218) 444-1744 Stearns County HRA Mr. Bob Swanberg ' 312 1st Street North Tel (320) 685-7771 Cold Spring, MN 56320 Fax (320) 685-7580 ' Central MN Federal Credit Union Mr. Rick Odenthal 20 South 4th Ave. East Tel (320) 256-4269 Melrose, MN 56352 Fax (320) 256-7519 ' Mother of Mercy Nursing Home Mr. Bob Wikan 230 Church Avenue Tel (320) 845-2195 ' Albany, MN 56307 WML Services Corporation W. Earl Wing 2101 South Blackhawk Street, Suite 100 Tel (303) 564-4685 ' Aurora, CO 80014 Hagemeister & Mack Architects, Inc. Mr. Murray Mack 501 West St. Germain, Suite 200 Tel (320) 251-9155 St. Cloud, MN 56301-3605 Fax (320) 251-4919 Pope Associates Mr. Skip Sorenson 1255 Energy Park Drive Tel (651) 642-9200 St. Paul, MN 55108-5118 Fax (651) 642-1101 SCI 10 SAND COMPANIES, INC. CITY REFERENCES t City of Albany ' PO Box 370 Albany, MN 56307 ' City of Rogers 12913 Main Street Rogers, MN 55374 I City of Chaska One City Hall Plaza Chaska, MN 55318 City of Bloomington 1800 West Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, MN 55431 City of Mankato PO Box 3368 Mankato, MN 56002 ' City of Maple Grove PO Box 1180 Maple Grove, MN 55311 City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. ' Plymouth, MN 55447 City of Blaine ' 10801 Town Sq. Dr. Blaine, MN 55449 City of Inver Grove Heights 8150 Barbara Avenue Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 M Mr. Tom Schneider (320) 845-4244 Mr. Gary Eitel (763) 428-2253 Mr. Dave Pokorney (952) 448-2851 Mr. Bob Hawbaker (952) 563-8922 Mr. Brad Potter (507) 387-8600 Mr. Alan Madsen (763) 494-6009 Ms. Marie Darling (763) 509-5457 Mr. Bryan Schafer (763) 785-6144 Mr. Bill Turnblad (651) 450-2553 11 SAND COMPANIES, INC. LICENSE NUMBERS MN Building Contractors License: BC -20061296 MN Real Estate Company License: RC -20144987 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS .0► Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. American Institute of Architects Minnesota Multi -Housing Association St. Cloud Area Chamber of Commerce Minnesota Safety Council Society of Human Resource Management ' ACCOUNTANT & LEGAL COUNSELS ' Schlenner Wenner & Company Mr. Robert Hengel 37 North 28th Avenue, PO Box 1496 (320) 251-0286 ' St. Cloud, MN 56302-1496 www.swcocpas.com Gray, Plant Mooty Mr. Peter Fuchsteiner ' 1010 West St. Germain, Suite 600 (320) 252-4414 St. Cloud, MN 56301 www.gpmlaw.com Rajkowski, Hansmeier, Ltd. Mr. Fred Grunke ' 11 - 7th Avenue North (320) 251-1055 St. Cloud, MN 56303 www.RajHan.com IM 12 SAND COMPANIES, INC. CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LIST 1990 Park Place Estates 84 Units Luxury Apartments St. Cloud, Minnesota 1990 Speedy Print St. Cloud, Minnesota 1991 Skip Sorensen Residence Monticello, Minnesota 1992 Park Place Estates Il 92 Units Luxury Apartments St. Cloud, Minnesota 1994 7' Street Townhomes 15 Units Rental Townhomes Monticello, Minnesota 1994 Country hm 46 Guest Rooms Baxter, Minnesota 1 1994 Regency Park Estates 145 Units Luxury Apartments ' St. Cloud, Minnesota 1995 Country Inn ' 60 Guest Rooms Woodland Park, Colorado ' 1995 Lakeville Court Apartments 52 Units Rental Apts/Townhomes Lakeville, Minnesota 1996 Countryside Townhomes 12 Units Rental Townhomes Albany, Minnesota 1996 Country Inn & Suites 46 Guest Rooms Detroit Lakes, Minnesota 1996 Albany Cottages - Phase I 4 Units Rental Patio Homes Albany, Minnesota 1997 Country Inn & Suites 22 Guest Room Addition Baxter, Minnesota 1997 Huski Townhomes 32 Units Rental Townhomes Hutchinson, Minnesota 1997 Mercy Manor 41 Units HUD 202 Housing Albany, Minnesota 1997 Country Inn & Suites 63 Guest Rooms Shakopee, Minnesota 1997 Country Inn & Suites 46 Guest Rooms Walker, Minnesota 1998 Albany Cottages - Phase 11 8 Units Rental Patio Homes Albany, Minnesota 1998 Park Forest Estates 55 Units Senior Apartments Mora, Minnesota 1998 Country Inn & Suites 48 Guest Rooms Albany, Minnesota 13 ' SAND COMPANIES, INC. CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LIST 1 � 1999 Country Inn & Suites 2000 The Creeks 78 Guest Rooms & Conf. Center 24 Units Rental Townhomes ' Mankato, Minnesota St. Cloud, Minnesota 1998 TGI Friday's Restaurant 2000 Boulder Ridge Townhomes ' 297 Seats 30 Units Rental Townhomes Mankato, Minnesota Shakopee, Minnesota ' 1998 Woodland Townhomes 2000 Memory Lane 30 Units Rental Townhomes Alzheimer Facility Mahtomedi, Minnesota Albany, Minnesota ' 1999 Country Inn & Suites 2000 School Square Apartments 79 Guest Rooms 17 Units Apts/Townhomes ' Elk River, Minnesota Albany, Minnesota 1999 Microtel Inn & Suites 2000 Birchaven Village Apartments 82 Guest Rooms 42 Units Sr Congregate Housing Fargo, North Dakota Bemidji, Minnesota 1999 Sterling Twinhomes 2001 Lake Side Townhomes 34 Units For Sale Twinhomes 36 Units Rental Townhomes Mahtomedi, Minnesota Woodbury, Minnesota 1999 Brickstone Townhomes 2001 Country Place Apartments 30 Units Rental Townhomes 16 Units Senior Housing ' Chaska, Minnesota Pierz, Minnesota 1999 Brickstone Estates 2001 Eagle Court Apartments 53 Units Apartments w/Retail 13 Units Senior Housing ' Chaska, Minnesota Randall, Minnesota 1999 Elm Creek Twinhomes 2001 The Preserve at Commerce 14 Units For Sale Twinhomes 192 Units Luxury Apartments Maple Grove, Minnesota Rogers, Minnesota ' 1999 Park Place Phase I 2001 Lyndale Avenue Townhomes Community Rm & Elevator Add 23 Units Rental Townhomes St. Cloud, Minnesota Bloomington, Minnesota 1w 14 t SAND COMPANIES, INC. CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LIST 2001 Heading 4 Home Twwnhomes 2003 Country Inn & Suites 20 Units Rental Twinhomes 23 Guest Room Addition Scattered Sites in Stearns County Conference Center Expansion Mankato, Minnesota 2001 Oak Grove Townhomes 30 Units Rental Townhomes St. Cloud, Minnesota 2003 Monument Ridge Estates 135 Units Luxury Apartments Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 2001 Shadow Hills Estates 2004 Central MN Federal Credit Union 322 Units Luxury Apartments Office Building Renovation Plymouth, Minnesota St. Joseph, Minnesota ' 2002 Heritage Park Estates 2004 Main Street Apartments Demo 150 Units Luxury Apartments Environmental/Demolition St. Cloud, Minnesota Albany, Minnesota ' 2002 North Pointe Townhomes 2004 Heritage Place 18 Units Rental Townhomes 75 Units Senior Apartments Blaine, Minnesota Rogers, Minnesota ' 2002 East Ridge Court 2004 Country Inn & Suites - East 18 Units Senior Housing 67 Guest Rooms ' Renville, Minnesota St. Cloud, Minnesota 2002 Southview Estates 2004 Mercy Manor Remodel t 47 Units Apartments Senior Assisted Living Conversion Bloomington, Minnesota Albany, Minnesota 2003 Boulder Ridge Townhomes 11 2004 Residential Land Development ' 22 Units Rental Townhomes 21 acres of Multi & Single Family Shakopee, Minnesota St. Joseph, Minnesota 2003 Country Inn & Suites 2004 Pullman Place 193 Guest Rooms 65 Unit Senior Cooperative ' Denver (Airport), Colorado Elk River, Minnesota 2003 American National Bank 2005 Morningside Townhomes Expansion & Renovation 32 Units Rental Townhomes ' St. Cloud, Minnesota St. Joseph, Minnesota 15 ' SAND COMPANIES, INC. CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LIST 2005 Mercy Manor II ' 26 Units HUD 202 Housing Albany, Minnesota ' 2005 Chanhassen Gateway Development 20 Acres Commercial & Residential Chanhassen, Minnesota ' 2005 Park Meadows Addition 20 Single Family Lots ' Hutchinson, Minnesota 2005 Albany Golf Vistas Addition ' 30 Single Family Lots Albany, Minnesota SCI 16 SAND COMPANIES, INC. HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS Country Inn & Suites By Carlson® Country Inn & Suites By Carlson® t 1900 Premier Drive 2760 South Ninth Street Mankato, Minnesota 56001 Salina, Kansas 67401 (507) 388-8555 (78S) 827-1271 ' • 100 Guest Rooms ❖ 72 Guest Rooms • 500 Person Conference Center > Meeting Rooms ❖ Attached TGI Friday's Restaurant Country Inn & Suites By Carlson® 18894 Dodge Street Northwest Elk River, Minnesota 55330 (763) 241-6990 o 79 Guest Rooms • Meeting Rooms Country Inn & Suites By Carlson® 4343 Airport Way Denver, Colorado 80239 (303) 375-1105 • 193 Guest Rooms • Meeting Rooms Country Inn & Suites By Carlson® 5353 North 27'" Street Lincoln, Nebraska 68521 (402) 476-5353 • 95 Guest Rooms • 350 Person Conference Center • Attached Beacon Hills Restaurant Beacon Hills Restaurant 5353 North 27'" Street Lincoln, Nebraska 68521 (402) 476-5300 Country Inn & Suites By Carlson® 120 7'" Avenue Southeast St. Cloud, Minnesota 56304 (320) 252-8282 • 67 Guest Rooms • Meeting Rooms 17 SAND COMPANIES, INC. RESIDENTIAL HOUSING MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS i Townsite Apartments 16 Units Apartments Albany, Minnesota Asset Management Parkview Apartments 24 Units Apartments Avon, Minnesota Asset Management Lakeville Court Apartments 52 Units Apts/Townhomes Lakeville, Minnesota Countryside Townhomes 12 Units Rental Townhomes Albany, Minnesota Woodland Townhomes 30 Units Rental Townhomes Mahtomedi, Minnesota Albany Cottages 12 Units Rental Townhomes Albany, Minnesota Huski Townhomes 32 Units Rental Townhomes Hutchinson, Minnesota Brickstone Townhomes 30 Units Rental Townhomes Chaska, Minnesota Boulder Ridge Townhomes 30 Units Rental Townhomes Shakopee, Minnesota School Square Apartments 12 Units Apartments 5 Rental Townhomes Albany, Minnesota The Preserve at Commerce 192 Units Luxury Apartments Rogers, Minnesota Shadow Hills Estates 322 Units Luxury Apartments Plymouth, Minnesota North Pointe Townhomes 18 Units Rental Townhomes Blaine, Minnesota Southview Estates 47 Units Apartments Bloomington, Minnesota Boulder Ridge Townhomes Phase II 22 Units Rental Townhomes Shakopee, Minnesota Monument Ridge Estates 135 Units Luxury Apartments Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota Lyndale Avenue Townhomes 23 Units Rental Townhomes Bloomington, Minnesota Heritage Place 75 Units Senior Rental Apartments Rogers, Minnesota 18 SAND COMPANIES, INC. RESIDENTIAL HOUSING MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS Morningside Townhomes ' 32 Units Rental Townhomes St. Joseph, Minnesota SCI 19 d ! �e Q! •: F 4!6 4! 4<4 O 5ETBACK5 50'-0- Q HWY #212 4 # 101 30-0' EL.5EWHERE APARTMENT HOME5 TOWNHOMM UNIT5 / ACRE PRELIMINARY 51TE LAYOUT PARCELS #I � #5 5CALe: i II = 100-0" $CAN ❖SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Bos 717 Waite Park MN 56387-0727 Office: (320) 202-3700 Paz: (320) 202-3139 Website: w .SandCompanimcom E -Mail: SCWandCompanimcom CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CNANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESE DRRWINGS PNDSPEC6 nOWARETIE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAND COMPANIES, INC. W, REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THESE DOCUMEMS 6 EORWDDEN WRMOUF WR N PERMISS.JN FROM SPND COMPMIIES.IW. auwxW .MVrc CHECKED R. HENNINGS REVISED DATE: -- SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.1 1 I�. V 1#R I " iW; 1r- -YJL. m11 1' J .,nt - I _ I E I IFF` � 1 .;'w,. , • -1 tom. �■ 1 - CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 7, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for rezoning of property from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. The property is located at the northwest corner of Lyman Boulevard and realigned TH 101. Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on May 26, 2005) sc""M Planning Case No. 05-01 Sand Companies Concept PUD $750 PUD $75 Notification Sign Rental $100 Notification Sign Damage Deposit $925 Check No. 12096 SCANNED Im1aN Notled Qrmra s.dm a, An Te fle Wb/bpsY!4 Cal'9 Luvq. wl.mm 0®N1 w b6>e cmawnba m pSa6mn. NN .aelwwams.am N.IIa r.Nwoes a da: tivmebpNwq NtlslSefn N.Falew ryem o' %nNWpIIswW - —'. Fao.edbvdlNSl)rbb 6®vlMp veN PdN d esymry'tl TrvtFnpnew. w. ](Hilt. m W N a �acapb NoeimdN Cabfl[mtlw.0 C et/. W.wdS 6rw abq d 1wegenWftft N,Xoww &g Ot rr�abeaawlEd,Ba—a a n� st r m N Pad a sa9pa9rc aNTral dr.te.r�e.bNe rm rmw wp.asa aT Iaala n gamma Er.lbwam wu a�.o sow w pate a+ % n:lwea a qwl Fat. v ml.a o f Nw r m N wNw N d wmaw o.mmmdaT�..9nmmlpaq WYar Pr w.lsn.awlm W.b sews mN a9m dNcwlr wwear. ca..�ab. waWI eaa MON eewbb w a. arae dleaarnmbseoo. w. ssmr. uw w6lesaYMeb1]W b WNu1pw9rs.a TaRtlaPw.lo-11 .M— b—b—aWrwareRbd4 p1 e9IDva Y ted.s dlew.wr. w4vl vldv aw 6genwmepnAm4vapdwl r 6sa .wwll pt pvyawYsa. Er.. FaI.OWw. u l9ey.a 12 fz ll.sadrmdu wu ro IbT n hye a w.r w..wl Eat YdYoa er]9 rbN .w,.am .n N eabpr pqa a.w N a rob rby.w w.1%: 6vo wpaN Ibp9 W u..m oybpadarn..wrm gpdw+PYw E T Nmpwloevowwem: oavawm%haesxw.wvmla Eat v 60va &114,90 r, ro MN IDapes.t wail]ambt Wyt •rtsMsabQtrmNNavdmbbNwtlalt y.tlg T W haw bNr. N�Im naeaw.ry qaq m wl.saa mwuwlgT� ISyea Wa Ns w.tun.Nmmwlq mu tpmvem pamabaaeaa .ay.vroNsewtgwasleneia se. sclb9Tll rsatM a�sa2 50 .ems n191a a n aLy.a n mops wawm.b.aopuewa saw w aaw wml�llme ss..wlpNq. am.aanuli pamsewu pawaaa 1e motla wawlaa au a tlnaaa ass su paaevbavo..a, .o.a.amNwLm..nw abntlu w-. bcb�laaasuedaaxpm tat mwm malagaf pgan 9e e9as a9 awlegadoeerrsm w hyrees W n:nMaaemY Wmtaadvw dN6wu peva SOYlw bpNaS]n•a.s.]smeb Wetl.e3bao d.]wrb>ilaWby bed eLdm N.pra MON maheaN WYp rylvagbTM µjp/w. Ipt.b gaammpbaW MldgMw�IWYI/IAYm apamW .b sows bN abm aN cenr w®e.. (w m.pE. r.em . 6�su bug me. aas be tls.m�N. sowway®wIm.raa.�ME>. lam a 9w.w u b N Pal a psla.a �.e�s.a n t sz qb o arm a q bm PM . part Nlaxa 1MwraN wY Im1 dN WPeW aawtl9mlm N.Towewlleww, Nags a Nbd.CevvCMy, Nmrm 6mbaabra fm.wury aN NmplLat fes davlp eemm N: Pleuvbp V sal baa a.1a swl N, sow W aaw.a pl ml.s a amlwn..emloarna rmN Pdm aebanlp a N mea Ierdn paoNe: Il.lmwwwalaawp as ua, pow w passes at.:ala a seal Eel •spaeate].wrb. wNry pm dwmaam �aPn6naa arm.wlamwda W PM Pb w.1an. a tltluamwaa a�awemNaraN coop R.we.. c.T .e/. Wmaem. p�.0 aloe alwNN9a a6Ema4 oaobalarwwn+wm Wpp1aM{i/Pltl w.t611.NIOYnMp leu Hlww pawwlbwapaa59 ednps.6vaPM EO1v OMMtlywlaak 6wOabp sO/vewaebN wpaaea. slm ervww: wbppatn5r Wte}ed L0.W bd mla .p.a.+pyrsns.rw..wa.b.doerpw.wwwagm W Igasaaw.m Em.lry a+nw u rmwmwrae• m rmeM wvemM Eel s gtlamtlYbA Wt Yusbps wvs.mpnb N war .l®a.ww.a..e byn a w is u I.s. a aw u ctlea .o. d t 0 pgaw w aN.aa sr «was .b a lM u era ww v aao.a n ab.r aaw�aEs alt.e a%nubN9bwtinapbN soW b d W mrN wO r gmeswapaNlYpwl oar. Iamroa oe m s. ww w Ems t9.bar a a.wl pr a lrm d sr +. r mN awN Ipl aWr IN alq.a w. t%. papamN nmwNrry wonaaa.r6.a abm esmm MrMMa. sa�Wabow.w. w. 9pru, m W s atr b W db d Nco.p aawb. rar.rra.w. MYvwem: prmwMtnb.waawr/w+maaslsl/ebpNYevaap tMdnpadtl rl6W b6i TMgmbpuwvW.SNE,N bbiy pass rn mwa: pl.o sow Npq.a a].b.r W amm.Em sa.roa Nt]+r: Wee Ydppwa.mnovebN and W wl®gmPabae:ac MIVVp� ap6.W Mt nJa aSpP.]OK ww/e.lsa hpeaV.07o ..wMaLnuelir pwe sow66 a.y®wl�tnrw®Mw.s• 6tlelw N W r: bNUA 19 hpw+e �mtaw�l WYSLmIw d 192.]0 r b N Pa. tl Bapvip PM a lwl apdNSotlr Q�braN Nrtwtl OlrbrtlesinN iwYyffp ww. iNy.a w.q. fa.o cwp.�ob.aafnpo6. Wpviw a N wlleMsN wwaT�tlAliplegw 1%awlW m W g1 d Cbb�om NY 3rE Mibi a Py m W tltld IawJnNdlvtlNluap pampa, taus Cab. KnaeOq, pdN qbm W w!M NdvlSeim N. IMpaW mNwwM1e gmmTmtlgyq W.1%. paw6oalw Njem% Ira II Ywla Eat abp oluMfla.etrbw gn21] r bN wswrN ww aawfq. e.q gwmebu..n oa.mp�.a L'-0mormboeanlwl w.lWwa pinae wbNbwrnpfwase Ooonad W.101]Ot, SM Npgw 251W N®4 Wst aJYotl b.arm W Mlw peat LlrrmX431pMYn: pvlml.patleW arc. Nulp wlgeea 11 mlabv M awl \Vel addv¢g2M ]1rbN uWve wongaoll rypgTnNlWLOT, pgl MrpN wtlwb 2Fnq MpGniyapwt ww wayas.tt mala 51 wwlFat a dlrm 8311] rm W MgBlpnYp C I 7,041p&a0.1616vstlbb PM 7 TLq wl d N SaCot Qaln d N 114bw1 Dab q eala R TwNp t tp ww. Paas ower cbve talar. 6aaaelabbw Comwap q N IMwtl Omrdul SaamR pawabp W mba sa s.lpm a sow W eq®%�I..r a a®l Eat.m.oa t.rp.a r b W aaanoy wwaa ww.e.ear6e.eaa bases pa.appral caparmebwbatl w. WaT%.bdilp abeN Pdlal.v.badNma W Iran aame.p'. nm abaNvalllblPN Nastip Wanal w. taut. sows. e.aa. a mr zp masa wr..lrm a am m b N ba lO. a sp u.wmn tEr 9a Aelae. Ila Me N vIY1/ Mql a ab r a req Nbpsar w. t%: %ev eba sa wbbl96la.o/ N, saw W Jyasa tt rrmla ]9 aeml E.tl, s delis N]5 res ewNaawNmlr ass cnanasm 16b 9d Mum.IMa MONw6spNa.os� e.s a bb avvoa.p a raa'A' b oa.wl w. )w6rTm W .aal.mgn N Pam dN soar oma.. c.a. r<Mr. saes vm ebasp ws.mp pna. alp) e.y.a 16 n.aa W wow Famv6eroa¢n ubwmawas.mm a: N�.ba sas.gm be.ww wasa�% .bas a bel ea.a-eMo a les rbNPmaewl.ba Ca1®i,M,a...lu aabtl GP ByILDING LAYOUT PLAN \Jr5CALL I:40 -Cr N a.Erut P.RCII EI- '1%O6fW YMLELIS: 1.21 nG]65 rMEELN� a.lc 6cla P/.Rm E+- 0021GFb IITF Y]P fpp 0 B MM'P212.I101 30A bYMtlR CITY MA Sand Conwnim Inc U{Setll TlY A— M7Tt Wv P ,MNMJfNfSr i1c.- (JSP/ MS.]]J9 w.bl:....s.artaaa./amaa tMe< scx..s'.alr:.a.la+amaa LEGEND OgIJI11EV - 5NADE TREE O- ORNAMENTAL OV TOW 511ADE TREE CONIFERS FOUNDATION PI LNG 'CHANHASSEN EIVED 6 2005 I LANNING DEPT a. CHANHASSEN GATEWAY HOUSING PHASE I CHANHASSEN, NIN BUILDING LAYOUT PLAN A-0.1 P L1 (neem IlIM) Tna yn amewea nan a me NPmam a.mle o1 s<am ze dine avpb am[ m nes d me vonnal o.aner d s,[em 11.,11 m r..aeno+ls Nam. Rag n win Larver Cvunry. M nnesola tlesmM+a bAwn Commenorg aline NOMweL Gmer of satl LeNon 2t Mrg Yso me aLW d Sm fo 2 ea W o201 mf rIm di 15521 I .Nal Ens 1 P IB[q M li -B LWvmN No.Y , 6kmtl 1 e[eN 1 ince me . h R L Gaay. NS abg m W ry II of 11131 demme P erg m m, r slam aa:mo �. m<�[a Be-. 33 E I�WI 5 ..Ide11.s Ot mmol .1T21 -.1. life, a PW N W Mbnd M 1111¢1.¢ Peynme T g Wry VI 6>. pal 4 m vl acme n me mina l n e n N [tl a county, M ,e- .Irc noMep lna ora[^n" R e [dMl -. It. th mM<aa er v dons zoa oocum<m No. ID69]I no zee d, r p)a do-, ad o1 .1-I Wnao oa l 2fe Wav Pbl No Iwl IldbMm Nree Pl m•aa Bw'Irt' a me .,1 .1 wn lergm d f I.- .1.d`mfW9l1:o[zelraarpkolMe , Ssemu's Ce N P eg 0➢ N 2 A E 14ar:[e .1111 Cl left NN 5 rc N J2 ms 651e d 9 tM Yzrtt N 11eg 2 35 E 6.] • M 9 av m, .1 TrIne nnltl re Hloe, rso . Psrsym . way 1.- m g (2) m N 60 Ory o E d .1. 190feel N $O dd n Wvl. e J6Wl u nm ll -mcfer ,mfd ayf e I._, v n m mtl 141 oel-I IT �P.nadm Fe PI v I. -Il 1 ybm lmell, 10 &e Iz art rpm )S R Temfool dYAh So m ti ] tuna d9I-.sea wain. s.% ¢,,rear ss male" v e.mmr wnm. a ¢¢dine a ]9 a r..r. u,nm oonom, I6 Mnuly Sq setups Msml .Amman p ZY J9R Nervy al; of serve lem [mea arc krgNazu301ea ra6:¢nss0.m a.gko ey Is t eme.24.1me. Na Mmsd,ed fi9ny o5 2l W lo rrs d N86s %ffi SMb eg SJ t] mz Wain. �rs-mmI].021M d, I. Veneered s 2 6z:I Ne 1 aamy yMdwelar M9pimwM 0 E -I y4 ren p Iof R, -r dun MRf-MW o 1 me mol .1 m fie dfi I6 C ndm,M r,Grver1 ne,wM fmome,I,. wmerN a I S z1. 5 W e yrezrs of mnules II " IEaI. a o13p5.891M11M PON da[ynny L Ioe1g 2+I S52 y.n.or 4 o TLa1 [vN 111.-1 1.11 .1111, fl.. ouaen o14 ©m a. rcrsM1P 111 MM. Com,,alma Nonnr est Cr s zsa s.deon 2t. H.eme Ymg me wool 111.1 vp $-ome I., u. L... eryreez 01-nulm 2 wogs. a 6zbee of Rl22 feel1. of. Pan dasg rp of N .11tte, 0evld a. Pent mEmme afere, west ire. 1.1111 06 deg 01 dendtos 22 ememes Eat a Sffircs of 167 W lem m. Minn ane.1M nn L ITnmzdoreee, f dNiy PYM. 1611.a mal ma am me auraI.E. of V¢ Luray If. f vLway. a ry an dine olaenmvne wSam.n of T..emlm>l m9nl or., Yc lm.y low ltl yea Pam ya6lWbgm Sl atfi ^ 9t -.1E m IYv"691e,1 tlaee ebg aonemuv bp. m Imdm.11115] .. of M. hB vi& amLe ro11 dryree535 --l6 rec.Mz aMa[noNtld Mas MvorWdgeaW "Im, $2 tta sMs Eam a drso,ce or 17761 IeeI o:er:¢HM t8hpw 16 es 56 seconds Eal a pslan[e ml II5391re1. Net¢ Yag a arve. mxaaeb IM ioumeasl, Mye elemen Rine mc I.,, vl6116kLL1a1:a a150.W Mtl. E�leVal ugm vl I. ecgrees M mnlm E] aerones m a WJ ma1 eMos Nam S v 17 mIudd 2] -mins Eme a dom.- or 61 II hN m me nMaerb: Ieff, I . n I. nMn 9,n.r sae in .1 dwiaalr9 -, doom ee9r.ea tg ---v > Wpy 1M1.711 IoN<defCM9ma esxM mf-edmm N 101 Caq. Vre.' raPvba/ aeo]ed Iv eau Tekpbe III .. of LYvarw6M. 90731. Ime am or,[cumLM RmGnn G d m me 1.-.1 , .mdm . ne M:neme mem[¢ed7-fen. aaM.seM mtl r:adm.aNM aw our lna dmed lam alae. b eel Td.1....n D.vlmmt Nu 9]RS. ee Whg 24.. ILrw de III- s.dn n e,91e<z l mmmaw mmme, mb.4a 1111.muN atomI I.m le me nMlmal. r.MseNmwv6 x'. w[ lemur oI es og =1 rade., oI so6 Jo 1. amrm mye or W doe ee n.aaana m Ee 9 o,= aM a cn.rd 11Mars 6dNn. dem.n SS.,- W attoM WeLI rslm[ear. .1 M. teal. 11- NOM 19 eryras 16 mnN¢.1.112. a� vl 1.L n bIv Pz P. d fim ,ym C0..rg5e0+2m1u12.-.1w Tea pn dine soN Puy mar.lino N.Meaal ouanx of somm zt, rwrNeP 116 NOM. Rage 23 Wes1.rver Ldun,. ee�ehe a I.Yrvrs. B ,dean, of me emm ealeM cemer of T•anll lImIdm N.lot asdenol. Hod e pa of Ganl.as-N. Jrd Mims, a pal 0, file am arr[mdn Ne office a. f, ty I,. Carves Cwnh. MImesW. My LLso m mevdeM sr¢d rye SeMm2e Miry 1 abo m Ilre aNeRne al raM ir.ml llrDmY No %. Nm.a Satlr W hp[o Ot v 22 aamNr Effi, Ywg rad [e ffee e. ...212"... s..oreweM mrll•r ola[emm�trxl vl4ma wlo laaev Mmprna Cay raven in oa menl Nol01]ot llrerrsatagme.wwateM irc.me DaarnleMM eemdlsu1 1eromld25mdeff 33z[mr6the aeaalmd III leas me - iderreI n a res..m yI .- of Ling.. One. Noon I'll 11mnNaelsewnes Wase. difyNOI ZN b1M ION¢ wahofdY to co mer desalted WNrtoml ddMo M41 Imm 51 dews akry me sodeel-bne olI'd 110 mI M.of our Wdegrza al mrvJes 515[ma6Effie d.slan[e.1 ]l 6] leer 1O ne PpM d Brymry conlarvm ].11 ffM1 or 0 1615 aaa d WE omefciI T m-1.1 Ne fI-I1.mI PuaMr.11.1-.-Puafm of Se.1an Z3. TdmdryIlfi NOM. Raine 23 West carver Coun,. e<s.. a bnvws. C.mrmnam al of le.foo r comm m satl sego m n. mmce a" me oat are of said s<.lon I, smuln o0 d,.- N mince,. odomr E- a ..- I. W vldnml<,n mme nl a [endo edo.I IaN seal. m Mona Demeorere C[Iy2 our m pa. mem N. la W I oelrq a6o N<yM ahq.ve.g mltMlRga lam nee.. aer[dMp. N,na abm m. rmm,�r.N hen o1>se o.anree ro 1.301 sn WI s. eryta[z n mmene n eaam[6.Yam a e,I oma Y e fI rotla eat slle.r ¢aid cMnnaf m nes Jm,eem.6mg ase Ne,. Ma. ear are m ane Ngnway No tIe 1Mn¢ almrg ab wNeM 7aet If1 feet y Me. SdM m I, mea 11 mneme<J9 s.vuk East a m9ance o12a ]E kH:o a saPhazaly inn• .1 rye Cnnnassen Ice, Ire Add.- dem.-to nvnM. "en olaz.bn pa•rsl Ol lane de,c,.-Trod -P-en Wam<nl W Jl6EJ7. m rye am of rwdm Olna nM Cmunry Re."" Carve¢CoonhMnn mm aby sa I,N ne]v[g.ea l6 mnutes Waa-oefa EaLaO¢tanre dl2]0 IaoN omllne e1omimenome...n. de.[.aagssds[ ....depes0l tuned¢ 22 aeOMs Eat a dzlarc<o116.36 ktl Ivd.e PUM a 9�mm cdmm.m sn,g n mr o 019. uvaMa 11 �� 1 f rl Y 'I t I n 1 s _ L Y y QO:I' P n\Lx- 11 , BUILDING LAYOUT PLAN urty, ea" �J 5CALE- I:4a-0e - N� 0 c O de 0 i Q u t CITY 4c 1 K i MAY �'/[�g -vin..- xrfincas �/ SU-0®MM"a212tIl Pl Y 3U -P [LSLWeBf M.tRiMWi MTA6 23 l.AVN11PCi 1.tomWR Pam eEn.a a PARfJ1I1 t 9C K2'+ 5RE IA 1.2f KR6 6 1., YIK4a5 I,2t Ke"I 511E IB: 269 KFSI' I PULCLM P.e6KeEE 511E K: 2.19 K.8 t6 VMI'. paC.[t n. 0 02 K4' r011A 632 FG SrtE pA: 18I IlmfS]KF SI[C m. s 2.51 Ki' 511EK' 21921aN5(KR 23 ,l I.11 w-lelly mod, vw j � Sand CanWania, Inc )tRGIi TSYA e- rro�m N PoaI AL\56fi.A_. � m ,l,d N'Auc Smdl oe,IIII m, E.11ail: 5'(YoSaad<'nrap•aninn•m LEGEND 13 BOl ETIRD 511PDE TREE OORIIAMENTAL OVE TolY 5HA E TREE -LpI1FER5 - FOUNDATION Me,NTING CHANHASSEN COVED 6 200,; PUNNING DEPT ImI CHANHASSEN GATEWAY HOUSING PHASEI CHANHASSEN,MN BUILDING LAYOUT PLAN A-0.1 pts 16 rziewa¢ A. �•� • x % M ov T e 1 f rl Y 'I t I n 1 s _ L Y y QO:I' P n\Lx- 11 , BUILDING LAYOUT PLAN urty, ea" �J 5CALE- I:4a-0e - N� 0 c O de 0 i Q u t CITY 4c 1 K i MAY �'/[�g -vin..- xrfincas �/ SU-0®MM"a212tIl Pl Y 3U -P [LSLWeBf M.tRiMWi MTA6 23 l.AVN11PCi 1.tomWR Pam eEn.a a PARfJ1I1 t 9C K2'+ 5RE IA 1.2f KR6 6 1., YIK4a5 I,2t Ke"I 511E IB: 269 KFSI' I PULCLM P.e6KeEE 511E K: 2.19 K.8 t6 VMI'. paC.[t n. 0 02 K4' r011A 632 FG SrtE pA: 18I IlmfS]KF SI[C m. s 2.51 Ki' 511EK' 21921aN5(KR 23 ,l I.11 w-lelly mod, vw j � Sand CanWania, Inc )tRGIi TSYA e- rro�m N PoaI AL\56fi.A_. � m ,l,d N'Auc Smdl oe,IIII m, E.11ail: 5'(YoSaad<'nrap•aninn•m LEGEND 13 BOl ETIRD 511PDE TREE OORIIAMENTAL OVE TolY 5HA E TREE -LpI1FER5 - FOUNDATION Me,NTING CHANHASSEN COVED 6 200,; PUNNING DEPT ImI CHANHASSEN GATEWAY HOUSING PHASEI CHANHASSEN,MN BUILDING LAYOUT PLAN A-0.1 Chanhassen Gateway Development Intersection of Highways 101 & 212 Chanhassen, Minnesota Chanhassen Gateway Development is appropriately named because it will be the premier entrance into Chanhassen's town center from new Highway 212 and the realigned Highway 101. This Gateway will link the highly populated area south of Chanhassen to new Highway 212, Downtown Chanhassen and Highway 5. Chanhassen Gateway North Site NW Quadrant of Highways 212 & 101 ❖ Site Acres: 6.15 Site SF: 267,894 ❖ 23 Townhomes ❖ 48 Apartment Homes Chanhassen Gateway South Site SW Quadrant of Highways 212 & 101 ❖ Site Acres: 14.91 ❖ Site SF: 649,480 69 Apartment Homes Retail Center — 21,840 SF Convenience Store Outlot Financial Intuition Outlot Office Center —17,800 SF 366 South Tenth Avenue •;•SCS Box Waite Park, Waite PMinnesota 56387 Tel (320) 202-3100 Sand Canpauies, Etc Fax (320) 202-3139 www.SandCompanies.com / / / / PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PARCELS #3 * #4 SCALE: I'= 100' -0 - NOTE: 5ET6ACK5 50'-0'QHWY#2124#101 - 30-O'EL5EWHERE , 69 - APARTMENT HOME5 5.98 ACRES - PARCEL #4 1 1.54 UNfT5/ACRE / \ / I -1 / WET LAND / I LYMAN BOULEVARD O O 0 I I I I O D2 I SCANNED ❖S`C'I Sand Companies, Inc. 336 Soath Tenth Avenue PO Bos 717 WaW Park AM 56387-0717 Office: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320) 202-3739 Website: %n w.SamtComp u%utCcam E -Mail: SC/@SandCompanieccom CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 HANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICAPONS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAID COMPANIES. INC. I REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF TIESE DOCUAIENIS IS FORBIDDEN WRH WWTTEN PERMISSION FROM SAND COMPANIES. INC. PROJECT NO: 043W DRAWN BY: JA CDC CIDCKED BY: R. HFNNINGS DA E REVISED DATE --- SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.2 Print Data/Map Pale 1 of 1 http://156.99.124.167/websitelparcel_intemet_recaplprintdatamap.asp?PID=250242411 5/27/2005 December 8, 2004 Greetings from Sand Companies, Inc. • SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park. MN 56387-0727 Office: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320)202-3139 E-mail: SCI4t:SandCompanics.com Website: www.SandCompanics.com Sand Companies, Inc. is proposing to de-salop the northwest and southwest quadrants of the future. realigned Highway 101 and tlfe new Highway 312 (formerly 212) into a neighborhood commercial and residential development. We are inviting you to an informal neighborhood meeting to answer any questions and invite your input about our proposed development Date: Thursday. December 16, 2004 Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: Country Suites Chanhassen 591 West 78" Street Chanhassen, NIN 55317 Pine and Oak Rooms 952-937-2424 If you have any questions in advance of the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me at (320) 202-3100 or via e-mail at RAHennu:gs�a,SandComnanies-com. You can also visit our website at www. SandCompanies.com to learn about our current developments. Thank you. Senior Architect Construction ♦ Property Management ♦ Development Equal OpIN)nu lin• Entphr rei- MEMORANDUM TO: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director MYl Of FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director 7� nrnuntaamt DATE: December 27, 2004 7700 Market Boulevard SUBJ: Sand Companies Concept Planned Unit Development; Comprehensive Park PO Boz 147 and Trail plan review Chanhassen, MN 55317 apartment building will utilize a trail connector over new Highway 212 to access the park. Administration This proposal includes land south of the new Highway 212 (Parcels #1 & #5) and land north Phone: 952.227.1100 of the new highway (Parcels #3 & #4). I will address them separately in my report. Fax 952.227.1110 Building Inspections _Parcels #1 & #5 - Proposed 73 units of apartment homes and townhomes Phone: 952.227 1180 Comprehensive Trail Plan Fax: 952 227,1190 Comprehensive Park Plan Engineering This site lies within the park service area (112 mile) of Chanhassen Hills Park. Convenient Phone: 952.227.1160 access to the park will be available via a south trail route or on -street along Lake Susan Fax: 952.227.1170 Drive. Full park fees shall be collected in lieu of parkland dedication at the rate in force at Finance the time of final plat. Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax 952227.1110 Comprehensive Trail Plan Parer & Recreation A section of the City's comprehensive trail plan currently exists on the west side of Highway Phone: 952.227.1120 101 at this location. This trail section needs to be maintained in its entirety. The future Fax: 952.227.1110 construction of Highway 212 will terminate the existing trail at the highway's north right -of - Recreation center way line. However, a new trail connector along the northern edge of the new highway 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 leading to the southern outlet of Lake Susan Drive and to Chanhassen Hills Park will be Fax: 952.2271404 constructed. Sidewalks connecting the various buildings to the nearby trail system should be included in the plan. Planning 8 Natural Resources Phone 952.227.1130 _Parcels #3 & #4 — Proposed 69 units of apartment homes and neighborhood business Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works Comprehensive Park Plan 1591 Park Road This site also lies within the park service area of Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the Phone: 952 227.1300 apartment building will utilize a trail connector over new Highway 212 to access the park. Fax: 952.227, 1310 Full park fees shall be collected in lieu of parkland dedication at the rate in force at the time Senior Center of final plat. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site Comprehensive Trail Plan www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us New trails along the north side of Lyman Boulevard and east side of new Highway 101 south are being planned for construction as a part of the Highway 212 project. Appropriate sidewalk connections to both of these trails should be included in the project plans. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Dale Gregory, Park Superintendent Attachment: Park Service Area Map g:\pwk\th\sand companies m rno.doc The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Chanhassen Hills Park Park Service Area Lake Susan ke Syrian P >ry Hill Par > 7" 2 f - ark i Ch assen Hi a ,., )� s� i opo South Parcel Hyman siva- -—Lym9�BNa fGa rai } Park Bandimere Bandimere Communi CITY OF CIIANgASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax 952,227 1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952 227,1160 Fax 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952227.1140 Fax. 952.2271110 Park 8 Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning d Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952 227,1310 Senior Center Phone: 952 227,1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web She www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Dir. FROM: Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer IAZ;? DATE: December 20, 2004 SUBJ: Concept Review of Curry Property (Sand Companies) LUR No. 04-20 Upon review of the concept plans submitted by Sand Companies, Inc. received December 2, 2004, I offer the following comments and recommendations: • The extension of Lake Susan Drive, from its current terminus to the intersection of new highway 101, will be required for development of and access to parcels 1 and 5. • The proposed driveway access locations off of Lake Susan Drive for parcels 1 and 5 must either be in the same location or meet minimum offset requirements of the City and/or County. The applicant should be aware that current Mn/DOT plans for the TH 212 improvements show a median in Lake Susan Drive, in front of the proposed access location to parcel 5. This would limit the access to a right-in/right-out only. Additionally, staff is recommending that access to parcel 5 be considered to come from a combined access with the property to the north, not off of Lake Susan Drive. The locations of the internal public roadway which will serve parcels 3 and 4 will be reviewed in detail at the preliminary plat phase. The roadway will need to meet all current design requirements for City streets including: minimum width, alignment, and curve radii requirements. The location of the south intersection of the new road at Lyman Boulevard will need to be re- located to the east so that it's over the existing sewer and water lines. Parcels 3 and 4 may be subject to future traffic signal and tum lane assessments for the benefit of the improvements to new highway 101. • A temporary easement for trail construction will be required along the north side of Lyman Boulevard. The right-of-way for old highway 101, between Lyman and Lake Susan Drive, will need to be vacated prior to any final plat recording for this site. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. • Public utility easements will be required over the existing sanitary sewer and water lines that go through the site. The development will be required to meet existing site runoff rates for the 10 - and 100 -year storms. c: Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director gAeng\projects\curty property (sand compania)\concept review.doe ��NNESplq Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 January 10, 2005 Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 RECEIVED JAN 14 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SUBJECT: Sand Companies Concept Planned Unit Development Mn/DOT Review SO4-104 Northwest Comer of Re -Aligned TH 101 and Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1009 Dear Ms Aanenson: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced site plan in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following issues: • These preliminary layouts do not show any proposed intersection design or relationship to proposed TH 101 ramp/loop design. We need geometric plans and dimensions of this development in relation to Mn/DOT's ramps and loops in order to review this project in full. Please contact Lynn Clarkowski, Area Engineer, at (651) 634-2103, or Ivnn.clarkowski(a,dot.state.mn.us if you have any questions about this information request. For the northerly site (Lake Susan Drive), the driveways off Lake Susan Drive should be opposite from each other and as far from TH 101 as possible, at the minimum 660 feet from TH 101. For the southerly site (Lyman Blvd), there must be a public street connection from TH 101 all the way to Lyman Blvd, for example, no dead ends, and it must have at least three lanes of approach (right, through, and left) to TH 101. A right turn lane and a left turn lane are required on TH 101 for this new street which must be aligned properly opposite Mn/DOT's ramps. Contact Lars Impola, Traffic Studies Engineer, Mn/DOT, at 651-634-2379 or lars.imoolana.dot.state.mn.us if you have any questions about these issues. More information is needed to determine whether a Mn/DOT drainage permit will be required for this project. Current drainage rates to Mn/DOT right of way must be maintained and applications for a drainage permit should include hydrologic computations for 10 and 100 year storms, drainage area maps and any other relevant information for pre- and post - construction conditions. Any wetland impacts that this development creates will need to be mitigated by the City or the developer. Please contact Martin Korthank at Mn/DOT Water Resources Engineering (651.634.2077) or(martin.korthankQdot.state.mn.usl with any questions regarding drainage permits. An equal opportunity employer As a reminder, Lyman Boulevard is County State Aid Highway (CSAR) 18. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid Hiles and policies. The County must review any changes to its County State Aid Highway system so that they stay within its system limitations. You may obtain additional information regarding State Aid rules and policies in any of the following ways: ➢ htW://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ➢ Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ➢ Please go to http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/andet8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. ➢ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding Mn/DOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design section at (651) 582-1293. • Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecgW/utility . Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Keith Van Wagner (651-582-1443), or Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. • As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. • As our request, please send an electronic .pdf file copy of your final plan submittal for our record keeping purposes to mary.jackson@dot.state.mn.us . Please refer to Mn/DOT Review # SO4-104 when emailing the .pdf file. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 582-1724 or Tod Sherman at (651) 582-1548. Sincerely, Mary E. Jac on pw"�� Intermediate Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Richard A. Hennings, Sand Companies, Inc. r 1 U CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DAO: 1/4/05 CC DATE: 1/24/05 REVIEW DEADLINE: CASE #: 05-01 BY: Aanenson, K 1/31/05 PROPOSAL: Conceptual PUD of 24 acres for commercial, office and multi -family` development. LOCATION: Northwest comer of Lyman Boulevard and realigned TH 101. 6y> � APPLICANT: Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South 10h Avenue. Waite Park, MN 56387 320-202-3100 PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Residential Single Family 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Mixed Use -Neighborhood Commercial or High Density Residential ACREAGE: 24 acres gross DENSITY: Residential portion of development Parcels 3 & 4 5.98 acres 11.54 units/acre Parcels 1 & 5 6.11 acres 11.95 units/acre ❑2 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a mixed use development. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving a rezoning because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. SCANNED Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD • Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 2 of 8 SUMMARY Sand Companies, Inc. is requesting concept PUD review for approximately 24 acres of land. This site is in the current Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). While utilities are available to the site it has not been developed because of the proposed improvements in conjunction with Highways 212, 101 and Lyman Boulevard. Scheduled improvements on these roads will not be completed until 2007 so it is unlikely that development will begin before then. Conceptual review of the property allows the developer to close on the purchase of the property and work with MnDot, the County and the City on the infrastructure improvements. The property is currently zoned RSF, Residential Single Family it is guided Mixed Use. The comprehensive plan states "the plan designates areas around the proposed TH 101/TH 212 interchanges as mixed use. This category has been established to accommodate either commercial or high-density residential developments. This area is in the current MUSA. The commercial use is intended to support or compliment the high-density development. If the city is to be developed commercially it shall be a business neighborhood commercial zoning district." State law states that the zoning and the land use designation be consistent. The land use designation is the official control. Therefore, a rezoning to a mixed-use PUD would be consistent with the land use. Staff is recommending approval of the concept PUD. BACKGROUND The subject site was given the mixed-use land use designation in the 1991 Comprehensive Plan update because of its proximity to the proposed 212/312 interchange at Highway 101. The land use designation of mixed use allows residential of 8-16 units per acre and neighborhood business district (see attached zoning standards). Southwest Metro Transit was recently rezoned to a similar mixed-use PUD. Under the next level of review the PUD design standards will be drafted to deal with the development standards. These standards will include architecture, height, setback, landscaping, buffering, signage, lighting, parking and permitted uses (see attached Ordinance No. 379). The intersection of Lyman Boulevard and State Highway 101 will be realigned with the improvements to Highway 212/312. These improvements are not scheduled to be completed until 2007. Development of this site will have to coordinate with these improvements. The applicant has met with the Planning Commission informally at two separate work sessions. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on December 20, 2004. The purpose of the concept review is to give further direction to the applicant as the development plan proceeds forward for conceptual review. Following is the requirements for conceptual PUD review. 0 0 Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 3 of 8 Concept PUD - What is required? The intent of the concept plan is to get direction from the Planning Commission and City Council without incurring a lot of expense. There will be a greater level of detail required through the city code and the conditions of approval in this report. Following are the requirements for conceptual PUD approval. Sec. 20-517 General concept plan. Chanhassen City Code (a) The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the city showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: (1) Overall gross and net density. (2) Identification of each lot size and lot width (3) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. (4) General location and extent of public and common open space. (5) General location and type of land uses and intensities of development. (6) Staging and time schedule for development. (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not Sand Companies, Inc. COttC• PUD • Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 4 of 8 obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior thereto to owners of land within five hundred (500) feet of the boundary of the property and an on-site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commission, the city council shall consider the proposal. If the planning commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the city council may proceed without the report. The council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions, as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four-fifths vote of the entire council. ANALYSIS The subject site is divided into 4 development parcels. Parcels 1 and 5 include the area north of the proposed Highway 212 interchange. This area is residential and proposes townhouses north of the extension of Lake Susan Drive and townhouses and an apartment building between the new Highway 212 and Lake Susan Drive. Density as proposed is just under 12 units per acre. Parcel 4 includes a 3 -story apartment building with 69 units. This development is also just under 12 units per acre. Parcel 3 or the rest of the site is proposed for commercial and office development. The southern portion of Parcel 3 is adjacent to residential development. Commercial development is not recommended in this area. The plan proposes a single -story office building. Staff believes that this provides a good buffer to the residential uses. The PUD ordinance also requires a 50 -foot buffer from the change in uses that are separated by a roadway. The restriction of uses and their location will be specified in the PUD. In addition, no drive- throughs will be permitted except for banks (see attached Land Use Detail Map). Following are conceptual comments that the various city departments have offered that need to be incorporated into the next submittal: Engineering • The extension of Lake Susan Drive, from its current terminus to the intersection of new highway 101, will be required for development of and access to parcels 1 and 5. • The proposed driveway access locations off of Lake Susan Drive for parcels 1 and 5 must either be in the same location or meet minimum offset requirements of the City and/or County. Sand Companies, Inc. Cont PUD • Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 5 of 8 The applicant should be aware that current Mn/DOT plans for the TH 212 improvements show a median in Lake Susan Drive, in front of the proposed access location to parcel 5. This would limit the access to a right-in/right-out only. Additionally, staff is recommending that access to parcel 5 be considered to come from a combined access with the property to the north, not off of Lake Susan Drive. • The locations of the internal public roadway which will serve parcels 3 and 4 will be reviewed in detail at the preliminary plat phase. The roadway will need to meet all current design requirements for City streets including: minimum width, alignment, and curve radii requirements. The location of the south intersection of the new road at Lyman Boulevard will need to be re -located to the east so that it's over the existing sewer and water lines. • Parcels 3 and 4 may be subject to future traffic signal and turn lane assessments for the benefit of the improvements to new highway 101. • A temporary easement for trail construction will be required along the north side of Lyman Boulevard. • The right-of-way for old highway 101, between Lyman and Lake Susan Drive, will need to be vacated prior to any final plat recording for this site. • Public utility easements will be required over the existing sanitary sewer and water lines that go through the site. • The development will be required to meet existing site runoff rates for the 10- and 100 -year storms. Wetlands Existing Wetlands One agturban wetland exists on-site. The wetland has not been delineated. A wetland delineation must be submitted prior to submittal of a development plan. Wetland buffer widths of 16.5 feet must be maintained around all wetlands on-site. All structures must maintain a 40 -foot setback from wetland buffer edges. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. Storm Water And Erosion Control Storm Water Management The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District is proposing a regional storm water pond in the southwest corner of Parcels 3 and 4 as part of their Lake Riley Basic Water Management Plan. In addition, the City will be locating a trail on the north side of Lyman Boulevard. The applicant should work with the agencies to accommodate the necessary improvements. Sand Companies, Inc. Cont PUD • Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 6 of 8 Erosion Control Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slone Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. Surface Water Management Fees Surface Water Management fees will be calculated when the precise breakdown of land uses is solidified and must be paid to the City prior to final plat recording. (These fees range from approximately $3,800 to approximately $14,000 per acre based on development type.) Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. Landscanine Landscaping requirements can be broken down into the following areas: Parking lots: All parking lots will require landscaping within and at the perimeter of the lots. Landscaped islands and peninsulas will be required in any lot over 6,000 square feet in size. All landscape islands are required to have a minimum inside width of 10 feet. Buildings: All buildings will be required to have foundation plantings. Residential areas will be required to meet subdivision tree preservation and reforestation requirements. Streets: Boulevard tree plantings are required along any collector roads, such as Lake Susan Drive. Sand Companies, Inc. Cont PUD • Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 7 of 8 Bufferyards: Bufferyard plantings will be required between parcels with different land uses, along streets and on the property of any office, mixed use, or commercial properties. A bufferyard planting will be required along the property line abutting the Chanhassen Hills neighborhood. Other: The city promotes the planting of native species. Groupings of shade trees and shrubs along natural areas, such as wetlands, are recommended as well as in areas such as the tot lot or the common areas between townhomes. Staff also recommends an interior streetscape of boulevard trees. Park Parcels #1 & #5 - Proposed 73 units of apartment homes and townhomes Comprehensive Park Plan This site lies within the park service area (1/2 mile) of Chanhassen Hills Park. Convenient access to the park will be available via a south trail route or on -street along Lake Susan Drive. Full park fees shall be collected in lieu of parkland dedication at the rate in force at the time of final plat. Comprehensive Trail Plan A section of the City's comprehensive trail plan currently exists on the west side of Highway 101 at this location. This trail section needs to be maintained in its entirety. The future construction of Highway 212 will terminate the existing trail at the highway's north right-of-way line. However, a new trail connector along the northern edge of the new highway leading to the southern outlet of Lake Susan Drive and to Chanhassen Hills Park will be constructed. Sidewalks connecting the various buildings to the nearby trail system should be included in the plan. Parcels #3 & #4 — Proposed 69 units of apartment homes and neighborhood business Comprehensive Park Plan This site also lies within the park service area of Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the apartment building will utilize a trail connector over new Highway 212 to access the park. Full park fees shall be collected in lieu of parkland dedication at the rate in force at the time of final plat. Comprehensive Trail Plan New trails along the north side of Lyman Boulevard and east side of new Highway 101 south are being planned for construction as a part of the Highway 212 project. Appropriate sidewalk connections to both of these trails should be included in the project plans. Building Comments None at this time. Sand Companies, Inc. Cont PUD • Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 8 of 8 Fire Marshal Comments None at this time. Housing A part of the city's comprehensive plan deals with housing goals and policies. The city does participate in the Livable Communities Act and has goals for housing diversity and affordability. Because of the location of this site in close proximity to mass transit, staff is recommending that some of the housing be considered for "affordable housing." The city is lacking most in affordable rental housing but consideration should be give to both housing types. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the concept PUD with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Submittal letter and application. 2. Public Hearing Notice and Property Owners List. 3. Notice of Neighborhood Meeting dated December 8, 2004. 3. Zoning Districts R-16 and BN. 4. Ordinance No. 379. 5. Land Use Detail Map. 6. Site Plan. g:\plm\2005 planning cases\05-01 sand companies concept pud - 101 & lymanlstaff report1-1-05.doc December 1. 2004 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED City of Chanhassen DEC 2 2004 Planning Commission 7700 Market Boulevard CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: General Concept Plan Review Sand Companies, Inc. Development (Curry Property) Dear Commission Members; ri • SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park, MN 56387-0727 Office: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320) 202-3139 E-mail: SCI@SandCompanies.com Website: www.SandCompanies.com In accordance with Sec. 20-517. General Concept Plan, we are making submission of drawings and supporting information for the property generally known as Curry Property, but defined as Parcels #1 and #5 north of the proposed Highway #212 and Highway #101 intersection and Parcels #3 and #4 south of the same intersection. We provide the following information in answer to the 6 information request made: (1) Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways and road locations; See Sheet A-0.1 for proposed layout of the north sites. Parcel #5 is to be devoted to two story townhouse buildings with double garages. Parcel #1 is to support development of 16 townhomes and 51 apartment homes in a three story building over a basement parking garage. On site vehicle traffic will be on private drives, and pedestrians will be accommodated with internal sidewalks connecting to walks along Lake Susan Drive. See sheet A-0.2 for the proposed layout of the south site. Parcel 44, with it large wetland area, will serve as the site for a three story building with 69 apartment homes over a basement parking garage. Parcel #3 will be developed for Neighborhood Business uses including service type offices, financial institutions, convenience store with gas pumps, and some neighborhood retails shops such as submarine shops, optical shops, pizza stores etc. Vehicular traffic is organized along a public street connecting between proposed intersection of Highway #101 and the on-off ramp to #212, and intersection of Lyman Boulevard at the existing Highway #101 location. We propose an internal sidewalk along one side of this internal street. (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; As noted on the plans, the apartment buildings are three story over parking garages, mostly below grade. The apartment buildings are 10 feet floor to floor, so third floor is 20 feet above grade, with the building eave height at about 29 feet. Because we prefer fairly step roof pitches, we would expect total peak heights to approach 45 feet to the roof ridge, or 37 feet to average roof height. The townhomes are two story, with eave heights at about 18 feet and roof ridge heights in the range of 30 feet. The commercial buildings will all be limited to one story, and to the extent we can control the individual building designs we would expect use of sloped roofs with eaves heights in the range of 10-14 feet and ridges in the range of 24 to 36 feet. P:\SCI-Com &De .Div\Chaohasaen Lad Development R04300Vvchiwcm Sit RelatcdWlanningCommisiml20lO4.doc Construction ♦ Property Management ♦ Development Equal Opportunity Employer E E (3) Type, number or square footage or intensities of specific land use; Parcels #1 and #5 on the north will be used for multiple residential use. A total of 7 buildings is proposed. The sites total 6.11 acres after additional right-of-way is taken for highway development, resulting in a density of 11.95 units per acre. Parcel #4 on the south will also be multiple residential with a density of 11.54 units per acre. At Parcel #3, actual building sizes will be largely dictated by setbacks and parking requirements. The drawing on Sheet A-0.2 shows a total of 41, 500 sq. of building, but his is just to represent on possible approach to the development of these building sites. In some cases, somewhat larger buildings could be developed (financial institution) without burdening the site parking ability. (4) Number of dwelling units; A total of 142 living units is proposed. (5) Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved; Sheets A-0.1 and A-0.2 show the extent of development. Areas have been established for water retention ponds, although no detailed design analysis has been completed. The significant wetland on parcel #4 will be retained, and there is current interest on the part of watershed district in utilizing some portion of Parcel #4 as part of a larger area water treatment system. We plan to cooperate in that effort. (6) Staging and timing of development; Both the massive highway construction process and market forces will control development of these parcels. It would be our goal to have building construction activity underway on parcels #1 and #5 during the summer of 2005. We expect little commercial demand for Parcel #3 until highway traffic on #101 is in place, so construction starts there are more likely to be very late 2005 or into 2006. Sand Companies, Inc. plans to conduct a neighborhood information meeting from 7:00 to 9:00 PM on December 15 at the Chanhassen Country Inn and Suites. Notices will be mailed to all residents of record within 500 feet of the property this week. Beyond the 11" x Ir site drawings we have prepared a large site drawing over an aerial photo that illustrates the relationship between our proposed development, the highway system and existing neighborhoods. We hope this is helpful to area residents and Planning Commission members alike. %nrrrrly RWI-Cem &Dev. Di .Chanha Land DevelopmemN043WArchileaure'\Siw RelawdiPlanningCommissiov120104.doe • • (5,5-01 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD RECEIVED CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 DEC 204 (952)227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT APPLICANT: Sand Companies, Inc. OWNER: Sand Companies, Inc. ADDRESS- 366 S 10th Ave Park MN 56387 TELEPHONE (Day Time) 320-202-3100 ADDRESS: 366 S 10th Ave Waite Park MN 56387 TELEPHONE: 320-202-3100 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non -conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit ✓ Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review ✓ Notification Sign Site Plan Review' X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost*` - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB Subdivision' TOTAL FEE $ 925.00 Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this boxL1 In po"esion Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. 'Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. "Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNEO 9 0 PROJECT NAME: Sand Companies Development, Chanhassen MN LOCATION: Northwest & Southwest comers of intersection of Highway 212 & 101 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached ALTA Survey for parcel descriptions. TOTAL ACREAGE: WETLANDS PRESENT: ✓ YES NO PRESENT ZONING: RSF REQUESTED ZONING: PUD PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Mixed use REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Mixed use REASON FOR REQUEST: To allow development of the various sites in conformance with the guided uses. This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title. Abstract of Title or purchase agreement). or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of rrry knowledge. �a oC/. o Date ate Application Received on 1,41.;, o `+ Fee Paid 9>: � Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 0 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 23, 2004, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Concept PUD, Sand Companies, Inc. — Planning Case No. 05-01 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Karen J. Engelhardt, Deputy Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 2004. Notary Public Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development for Proposal: commercial, office and multi -family development on approximately 22 acres of property Planning File: 05-01 Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Property Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Blvd. and the Location: future realigned Highway 101. Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Comments: or e-mail kaanensonfci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard, Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff pereon named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development for Proposal: commercial, office and multi -family development on approximately 22 acres of property Planning File: 05-01 Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Blvd. and the Property future realigned Highway 101. Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead t* public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Comments: or e-mail kaanenson@ci.chanhasson.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, wetland Alterati Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of th application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commemial4ndustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. tis map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey antl is not intended ro be used as one. As map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, courtly, state and choral offices and other sources regarding Me area shown, and is to be used to reference abbess only. The City does not timu am Mat the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used prepare this map are error from, and Me City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used r navigational, tracking or any other Itumose requiring exacting measurement of distance or rection or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found ease contact 952-227.1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnabi Maes §666.03. Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map ackmwledges that the City shall not > liable for any damages, and expresay waves all charts, and agrees to defend, indermify, and Ad hamlless the City from any and all darts brought by User, is errptoyeas or agents, or third toes which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. his nip is neither a legally recorded npp nor a survey ant, i5 not intended b be used as orfs. his map is a corrpilation of records, infomsdon and data located in various city, county, state and ,lana offices and other sources reganfng the area shove, and is to a used for reference reposes only. The City does trot warrant Mat the Geographic Infomration System (GIS) Data used prepare this map are error free, and The City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used m navigau0n2h treebleng or any other purpose requnng exacting measurcrtent of distance or rection or precision in the depiction of geographic featuresIf errors or discrepancies are found ease contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclainter is provided pursuant to Nrnesom tatutes §666.«1. Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not a liable for MY damagm antl ergressiy waives al clans. and agrees to defend, indennity, and Ad harmless the City from any and at clairrt brought by User, its errgloyees or agents, or third miss which arise orb 0 this users access or use of data pmwdwl E 0 0 CHRISTOPHER T & AIMEE J ADAMS RICHARD C & SUSAN M AMBERSON MICHAEL B & CATHERINE 8690 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8549 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S ANDERSON CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8709 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT F & KAREN L ANDERSON GREGG A & MICHELLE D ALINE RUSSELL G BAHENSKY 8561 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8705 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8552 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG R & GERALDINE BARETTE R STEVEN & MAURA BARNETT WILLIAM E BENSON 8695 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8709 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8596 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TERRY LEE & MARI T BERANAK JOSHUA E & CORA L CONKLIN ALAN COSENTINO & 8576 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8990 QUINN RD SHERRI BEIER CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8572 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EDWARD S & NANCY J COUGHLIN JAMES A CURRY NORMAN & JACQUELINE ENGEL 587 SUMMERFIELD DR 6105 EDEN PRAIRIE RD 8699 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 417 EDINA MN 55436 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK A & LAURENE FARRELL JASON J GILBERTSON & GREGG D GUTSCHOW & 801LYMAN BLVD KATJAJEANNERET BARBARA J CLAYTON CHANHASSEN MN 55317 583 SUMMERFIELD DR 8691 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS P HAGMAARTENE & HUSSAM HASSOUN GREGORY J & SUSAN L HENKEL SUSAN M E R IELD D I 8537 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8699 MARY JANE CIR 625 SUMMERFIELD 5 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DANIEL M & MELISSA L HERZOG CHRISTOPHER & DEBORA K HOL TROY & JENNIFER HOLASEK 8790 LAKE SUSAN CT 8687 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8556 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RONALD G & JOYCE L HORR BRIAN W & KRISTIN A HOULE BENJAMIN R K & DONNA M 8513 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 880 LAKE SUSAN DR JOHNSON CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8521 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICIA JOHNSON SHANNON G & MICHELLE A KERN LAWRENCE C & ELIZABETH KLEIN 8715 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 607 SUMMERFIELD DR 9170 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 AL & M J KLINGELHUTZ TRUST S & TRACY L KURVERS C/O ALOYSIUS & M J KLINGELHUTZ MARK CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 8560 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANTHONY LARSON & LINDSAY NELSON 8545 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HARLAN C LEOPOLD 8553 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID S & JANICE A LUNDQUIST 8705 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL G & KAREN L MCNEIL 8695 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TIMOTHY S & TAMARA S MILLER 579 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL W & ANA E MORENO 603 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVE J & MARY A PAN ENO 8564 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY A & MICHELLE M REITAN 8900 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DENNIS H & RUTH L LAUFENBURGER 8673 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LONG LI & YING Z WANG 8557 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SO VAN LY & SUSAN YKUN UNG 8509 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CYNTHIA ANN MILLER 891 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK L & KIM M MISMASH 591 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CRAIG L & PATRICIA A MULLEN 611 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SEONGWOO PARK & MIN JEONG HAN 8580 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL & MELISSA ROHRMOSER 8698 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 1] MARK R & STACEY G LAKOSKY 8533 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KHANH & KHIEM LE 631 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 ROBERT B MARTINOVICH & PATRICIA A MARTINOVICH 8592 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREG ALLAN MILLER 8801 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LISA K MOORE 8682 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC S & JULIE A OYEN 615 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PHOULITHAT PHANDANOUVONG & VATSANA PHANDANOUVONG 8529 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RAYMOND J BOOB JR & CHAE SUK ROOB 8584 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS A & GRETA K ROSE JEFFREY A & TANYA L SCHNEIDER PAUL C SCHNETTLER & 8541 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8702 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N KATE D WARD SCHNIETTLER CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 599 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 AMY J SCHUETTE ETAL 8990 QUINN RD PO BOX 68 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DONALD T SINNIGER & MICHELE M ABEL 600 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES JONATHON SOMMERS & KAREN D ROGGE 8683 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SPRINGFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSN 7100 MADISON AVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 LESLIE E TIDSTROM 8679 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 UTPAL R VAIDYA & LEENA UTPAL VAIDYA 861 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 • KEITH E & LISA L SCHWEGLER 619 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID M SMITH & PATRICE N LUNDGREN-SMITH 8568 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & JODI L SOTEBEER 8565 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL MN 55155 ABBA J TREGOBOV & SUSANA P MACHADO-TREGOBOV 8714 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN H & RUTH M VANCE 8588 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK & KRISTINA SCHWENDINGER 8708 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JUDSON E & JILL C SNELL 8694 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CURTIS A & SUSAN M SPERLING 8525 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRUCE A & SHEILA M TANQUIST 8569 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP INC ATTN: TAX DEPT M/S 624 PO BOX 7028 BEDMINSTER NJ 07921 BRYAN J & LISA C VAN NINGEN 8686 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMI D WALKER CORY M & PAMELA S WATKINS FRANK T & MARY LOU WHALEY 8517 CHANHASSEN HLLS DR S 595 SUMMERFIELD DR 851 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 December 8, 2004 Greetings from Sand Companies, Inc. -SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park. SIN 56387-0727 Office: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320)202-3139 E-mail: SC'hg.SandCompanics.com Website: wnw.SandC'ompanies.com Sand Companies, Inc. is proposing to dtwelop the northwest and southwest quadrants of the future. realigned Highway 101 and : tfe new Highway 312 (formerly 212) into a neighborhood commercial and residential development. We are inviting you to an informal neighborhood meeting to answer any questions and invite your input about our proposed development. Date: Thursday, December 16, 2004 Time: 7:00 pm - Location: m.Location: Country Suites Chanhassen 591 West 78" Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Pine and Oak Rooms 952-937-2474 If you have any questions in advance of the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me at (320) 202-3100 or via e-mail at RAHenn rgs@SandCompanies.com. You can also visit our website at www. SandCompanies.com to learn about our current developments. Thank you. Senior Architect Construction ♦ Property Management ♦ De-velopment Equal Opportunin• Entplm er 0 9 ZONING § 20-680 (2) The minimum lot frontage is as follows: a. If a two-family dwelling is located on the lot, fifty (50) feet per dwelling unit, except that if the lot fronts on a cul-de-sac, the lot shall be fifty (50) feet in width at the building setback line. b. If a townhouse or multiple -family project is located on the lot, one hundred fifty (150) feet. (3) The minimum lot depth is one hundred fifty-five (155) feet. (4) The maximum lot coverage is thirty-five (35) percent. (5) The setbacks are as follows: a. For front yards, twenty-five (25) feet. b. For rear yards, twenty-five (25) feet. C. For side yards, ten (10) feet. (6) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, three (3) stories/ thirty-five (35)feet. (Ord.: b. For accessory structures, one (1) story/fifteen (15) feet. Sec. 20-676. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "R-12" District: (1) Reserved. (2) Temporary real estate office and model homes. (Ord. Nu. lav, y o, a-ia-w, Secs. 20-677-20-679. Reserved. DIVISION 2. "R-16" DISTRICT* Sec. 20-680. Intent. The intent of the R-16 District is to provide for multifamily residential structures at a maximum net density of sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre on land guided for high density residential uses by the city comprehensive plan. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90) *Editor's note—Section 1 of Ord. No. 123, adopted Mar. 12, 1990, amended Art. XV by adding §§ 20-680-20-684. At the editor's discretion, the new provisions have been included as Div. 2 to this article. Supp. No. 9 1219 0 § 20-681 Sec. 20-681. Permitted uses. CHANHASSEN CITY CODE The following uses are permitted in an R-16 District: (1) Multifamily dwellings. (2) Public and private parks and open space. (3) Utility services. (4) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90; Ord. No. 259, § 19, 11-12-96) Seo. 20-682. Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in an R-16 District: (1) Garage. (2) Storage building. (3) Swimming pool. (4) Tennis court. (5) Signs as per allowed in R-12 District. (6) Home occupations. (7) One (1) dock. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90) 9 Sec. 20-683. Conditional uses. j The following are conditional uses in an R-16 District: `1) Churches. (2) Day care center. 0311 Group home serving from seven (7) to sixteen (16) persons. (4) Health services. `S' Recreational beach lots. L4) Temporary real estate office and model home. Towers and antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. Sec. 20-684. Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an R-16 District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum lot area is as follows: a. Two thousand seven hundred (2,700) square feet per dwelling unit. Supp. No. 9 1220 r ZONING § 20-692 (2) The maximum lot coverage is fifty (50) percent. (3) The building setbacks are as follows: a. For front yards, fifty (50) feet. b. For rear yards, fifty (50) feet. C. For side yards, fifty (50) feet. (4) Parking setbacks shall be twenty-five (25) feet from all property lines. (5) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal strucnrre, three (3) storiWthirty-five (35) feet. b. For accessory structures, one (1) story/fifteen (15) feet. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90) Sees. 20-685-20-690. ARTICLE XVI. 'BN" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT See. 20-691. Inten . The intent of the "BN" District is to provide for limited low intensity neighborhood retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 10(5-10-1), 12-15-86) See. 20-692. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in a "BN" District: (1) Antenna as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (2) Community center. (3) Convenience stores without gas pumps. (4) Day care center. (5) Health services. (6) Home Furnishings. (7) Offices. (8) Personal services. (9) Private clubs and lodges. (10) Shopping center. (11) Small appliance repair shop Supp. No. 10 1CL1 0 0 § 20-692 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE (12) Specialty Retail Shop. (13) Utility services. (14) Veterinary clinics. Sec. 20.693. Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in a 'BN' District: (1) Parking lots. (2) Reserved. (3) Signs. (4) Temporary outdoor sales (subject to the requirements of section 20-312). 1, 1 -LY -JJ J Sec. 20-694. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in a 'BN' District: (1) Bed and breakfast establishments. (2) Convenience store with gas pumps. (3) Drive-in banks including automated kiosks. (4) Fast food restaurants without a drive-through as part of a shopping center. (5) Motor Fuel Station. (6) Reserved. (7) Standard restaurants. § 4(7), Sec. 20-695. Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in a 'BN' District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum district area is three (3) acres. This paragraph maybe waived in the case of expansion to an existing district. (2) The minimum lot area is fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. i (3) The minimum lot frontage is seventy-five (75) feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall have a minimum frontage of sixty (60) feet in all districts. (4) The minimum lot depth is one hundred fifty (150) feet. (5) The maximum lot coverage including all structures and paved surfaces is sixty-five (65) percent. Supp. No. 10 1222 0 ZONING 0 § 20-695 (6) Off-street parking shall comply with district setback requirements except: a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad right-of-way, except as provided in sections 20-1191 and 20-1192 pertaining to landscaping require- ments. b. There is no minimum setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. C. The minimum setback is fifty (50) feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right -of --way. d. The minimum setback is twenty-five (25) feet for side street side yards. e. Parking setbacks along public rights-of-way may be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that one -hundred -percent screening is provided at least five (5) feet above the adjacent parking lot. The intent of this section is that the city is willing to trade a reduced setback for additional landscaping that is both an effective screen and of high quality aesthetically. Acceptable screening is to be comprised of berming and landscaping. Screening through the use of fencing is not permitted. (7) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, one (1) story. b. For accessory structures, one (1) story. (8) Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards, thirty-five QLfeet. b. For rear yards, thirty (30 eet. C. For side yards, fifteen (151 feet. d. The minimum setback is fifty (50) feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. e. Buffer yards: The city comprehensive plan establishes a requirement for buffer yards. Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density uses. In these areas, a fifty -foot buffer yard is to be provided where the interface occurs along a public street, a one -hundred -foot buffer yard is required where the interface occurs on internal lot lines. The buffer yard is an additional setback requirement. It is to be cumulatively calculated with the required setbacks outlined above. The full obligation to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use. The buffer yard is intended to provide additional physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use. As such, they will be required to be provided with a combination of berming, landscaping and/or tree preservation to maximize the buffering potential. To the extent deemed feasible by the city, new plantings shall be Supp. No. 9 1223 0 0 § 20-695 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE designed to require the minimum of maintenance, however, such maintenance as may be required to maintain consistency with the approved plan, shall be the obligation of the property owner. Buffer yards shall be covered by a permanently recorded conservation easement running in favor of the city. In instances where existing topography and/or vegetation provide buffering satisfac- tory to the city, or where quality site planning is achieved, the city may reduce buffer yard requirements by up to fifty (50) percent. The applicant shall have the full burden of demonstrating compliance with the standards herein. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 10(5-10-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 94, §§ 1, 2, 7-25-88; Ord. No. 136, §§ IA, 113, 1-28-91) Sec. 20-696. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "BN" District: (1) Churches. (2) Reserved. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90; Ord. No. 243, § 4, 2-13-95) Secs. 20-697-20-710. Reserved. ARTICLE XVIL 'BH" HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS SERVICES DISTRICT Sec. 20-711. Intent. The intent of the "BH" District is to provide for highway oriented commercial development restricted to a low building profile. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 11(5-11-1), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-712. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in a "BH" District: (1) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (Z) Car wash. (3) Community center. (1j) Convenience stores without gas pumps. CJ—N Day care center. C6� Fast food restaurant. C7) Financial institutions with/or without drive-through services. Supp. No. 9 1224 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 379 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property as described below from RSF, Single Family Residential District to PUD -Mixed Use, Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use: All of west half of the northwest quarter of section 24, township 116, range 23, lying southerly of the right-of-way for TH 312 and easterly of right-of-way line of realigned TH 101, and north of the right-of-way for Lyman Boulevard. Section 2. The rezoning of this property is subject to the following design standards: PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a Mixed Use PUD including a Transit Oriented Development, Neighborhood Commercial and Residential. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with meeting the daily needs of the neighborhood and the transit facility users. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on these lots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Commercial and transit uses shall be limited to the area located north of the access point off of Highway 101. Residential uses shall be located south of the Highway 101 access. Small to medium sized restaurant -not to exceed 8,000 square feet per building (no drive-thru windows) • Office • day care 0 0 • neighborhood scale commercial up to 8,000 square feet per building footprint • convenience store without gas pumps • specialty retail (book store jewelry, Sporting Goods sale/rental, Retail Sales, Retail Shops, Apparel Sales, etc.) • personal services (an establishment or place of business primarily engaged in providing individual services generally related to personal needs, such as a tailor shop, Shoe Repair, Self-service Laundry, Laundry Pick-up Station, Dry Cleaning, dance studios, etc). • Park and Ride not to exceed 800 spaces. • Residential High Density (8-16 units per acre). C. Prohibited Ancillary Uses • Drive thru Windows • Outdoor storage and display of merchandise d. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks: Boundary Building and Parking Setback Boulevard 50 feet -Lyman Highway 101 35 feet north of the Highway 101 access and 50 feet south of the 101 access Highway 212 excluding transit shelters and rams 50 feet Project Property Line 100 Feet -Easterly Internal Project property lines 0 Feet Hard Surface Coverage 50% Commercial and Transit Facility Hard Surface Coverage 70% Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less Maximum Commercial Building/Structure Height 1 story Maximum Park and Ride Ramp excluding the elevator shaft and stair well 25 or 3 stories, I whichever is less e. Non Residential Building Materials and Design The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. The intent is to create a neighborhood and transit friendly development. 2 0 0 2. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Major exterior surfaces of all walls shall be face brick, stone, glass, stucco, architecturally treated concrete, cast in place panels, decorative block, or cedar siding. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted block or brick. Bright, long, continuous bands are prohibited. 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. Exposed cement ("cinder") blocks shall be prohibited 4. Metal siding, gray concrete, curtain walls and similar materials will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials, or as trim or as HVAC screen, and may not exceed more than 25 percent of a wall area. 5. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 6. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 7. The buildings shall have vaned and interesting detailing. The use of large unadorned, concrete panels and concrete block, or a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in materials, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public ways shall be prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. 8. There shall not be underdeveloped backsides of buildings. All elevations shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. 9. The materials and colors used for each building shall be selected in context with the adjacent building and provide for a harmonious integration with them. Extreme variations between buildings in terms of overall appearance, bulk and height, setbacks and colors shall be prohibited. f. Residential Standards 1. Building exterior material shall be a combination of fiber -cement siding, vinyl siding, stucco, or brick with support materials such as cedar shakes, brick and stone or approved equivalent materials as determined by the city. 2. Each unit shall utilize accent architectural features such as arched louvers, dormers, etc. 3. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 4. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building or landscaping. 5. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick and stone. 6. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. g. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights-of-way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. 1. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to, truck loading areas, trash storage, parking lots, Large unadorned building massing, etc. 2. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 3. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells shall be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. 4. Undulating berms, north of Lyman Boulevard and east of Highway 101 shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. 6. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. h. Street Furnishings Benches, kiosks, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. 4 0 0 i. Signage The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment and the business's ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet the city's goals: • Establish standards which permit businesses a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise their name and service; • Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination; • Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; • Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; • Preserve and protect property values; • Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; • Limit temporary commercial signs and advertising displays which provide an opportunity for grand opening and occasional sales events while restricting signs which create continuous visual clutter and hazards at public right-of-way intersections. 1. Project Identification Sian: One project identification sign shall be permitted for the development at the entrance off of Highway 101. Project identification signs shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. 2. Monument Sign: One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrance to the development off of Lyman Boulevard. This sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. 3. Wall Signs: a. The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend greater than 20 feet above the ground. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, or translucent facing. b. Illuminated signs that can be viewed from neighborhoods outside the PUD site, are prohibited. c. Tenant signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant's proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 15% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. 4. Festive Flaes/Banners a. Flags and banners shall be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. In. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric or vinyl. c. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. d. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two feet. e. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. f. Flags and banners which are torn or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. 5. Building Directory a. In multi -tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. 6. Directional Signs a. On -premises signs shall not be larger than four (4) square feet. The maximum height of the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet from the ground. The placement of directional signs on the property shall be so located such that the sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties (including site lines or confusion of adjoining ingress or egress) or the general appearance of the site from public rights-of-way. No more than four (4) signs shall be allowed per lot. The city council may allow Col 0 0 additional signs in situations where access is confusing or traffic safety could be jeopardized. b. Off -premises signs shall be allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately routed through residential streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. c. Bench signs are prohibited except at transit stops as authorized by the local transit authority. d. Signs and Graphics. Wherever possible, traffic control, directional and other public signs should be consolidated and grouped with other street fixtures and furnishings to reduce visual clutter and to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement. A system of directional signs should also be established to direct traffic within the commercial area and away from residential areas. 7. Prohibited Signs: • Individual lots are not permitted low profile ground business sign. • Pylon signs are prohibited. • Back lit awnings are prohibited. • Window Signs are prohibited except for company logo/symbol and not the name. Such logo shall not exceed 10% of a window area • Menu Signs are prohibited. 8. Sign Design and permit requirements: a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. c. Wall business signs shall comply with the city's sign ordinance for the Neighborhood business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the "street" front and primary parking lot front of each building. j. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the 7 0 0 development. High pressure sodium vapor lamps with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. 2. Light fixtures should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). Street light fixtures should accommodate vertical banners for use in identifying the commercial area. The fixtures shall conform with (Figure 36 — Chanhassen Lighting Unit Design). All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. YeYO �v�e-c.vee mwe.. I i ts� x - cn.m,.am upw� uml Dm 41 4. Lighting for parking areas shall minimize the use of lights on pole standards in the parking area. Rather, emphasis should be placed on building lights and poles located in close proximity to buildings. k. Non Residential Parking 1. Parking shall be provided based on the shared use of parking areas whenever possible. Cross access easements and the joint use of parking facilities shall be protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. 2. The development shall be treated as an integrated shopping center and provide a minimum of one space per 200 square feet of commercial/retail area. The office/personal service component shall be treated as an integrated office building and provide 4.5 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 49,999 square feet, four per thousand square feet for the second 50,000 square feet, and 3.5 per thousand square feet thereafter. 1. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. 12 0 0 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2004. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, Clerk/Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Summary Ordinance published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 15, 2004) W i • Sand Companies Land Use Detail Map TOWNHOUSE � p LL—J.APTS. i j TOWNHOUSES G f . LU I LL / Q w SOUTHWEST METRO COMMERCIAL TRANSIT / APTS. a LL COMMERCIAL WETLAND OFFICE j m RMbENTIAL 50' BUFFER 50' BUFFER it t I iit I PARCEL pS — 5e 5A \ \ \ T �\ <T \\\ \ x hJhP / 1 wl z ZI I O I z Z I al OI wl z Ir 3I OI 1 dI w I_ �I I I I ' I I I J jl C 1 N 5ETBACK5 50'1 @ HWY #212 < # 101 30'-O' ELSEWHERE 51 - APARTMENT HOMES 22 - TOWNHOMES - 73 - TOTAL LIVING UNIT5 1.95 UNIT5 /ACRE PRELIMINARY 51TE LAYOUT PARCELS #I f- #5 5CALE: I R= 100--0" ❖sci Sand Companies, Inc 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Bos 727 Waite Pant MNS6387-0727 Office: (320) 202-3100 Far: (320) 202-3139 WebI www.SandCompanieacom E -Mail: SCl@SandCompaniexrom CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 -HANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT 7MESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICAnDNs ARE ME SOLE PROPER7Y OF SAND COMPANIES, INC ANY REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THESE WOJINEENTS 5 FORBIWENWa"CI M=EN PERMISSION FROM SAND COMPANIES, INC. PROJECTNO.: Oi300 ORAIM BY: JAVICOIO CNECKEO BY: R. NE.NI DATE REVISED DATE'. --- SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.1 (a NORTH PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PARCELS #3 * #4 5CALE: I"= 100-0' NOTE: 5ETBACK5 50'-O'QHWY#2124#101 30-0' EL5E"ERE / G9 - APARTMENT HOME5 , 5.98 ACRE5 - PARCEL #4 (T I I .54 UNITS /ACRE �O / I \2 ,, I / I / oz`� ,IN/ r / WET LAND � / ItI I --------------------- v" A 3 5TORY BUILDING OVER PARKING GARAGE LYMAN BOULEVARD +l+ RETAIL PONDIF] 5TORE CAR WA511 Z ON +*SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Pads MN56387-0727 Offwv (320) 202-3100 Far (320) 202-3139 Website: w SamdCompa,lieaeom E -Mail: SCI IVandCompaniticom CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESERWEFt OSFIOS COMPANIES. OMPANTHE SOLE PROPECN R SFIO COF TFIEES,ICIMEN TS IS FORM UCTON OR REUSE OF T IOIOFI ROM SA.D coEN mum U(WRITTEN P@iMIS510N FROM SAND fAMPM11E5, W. PROJECT NO- 4W3()() O .DY: JAV.fdO .KIXEOw: RIffNINGS OATS RENSED MTE --- SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.2 . � Ga3esa>9esa9�eax_zacaas�erk'Pc+.dz4ix£S�1 � illlll_��:III�R� Z ON +*SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Pads MN56387-0727 Offwv (320) 202-3100 Far (320) 202-3139 Website: w SamdCompa,lieaeom E -Mail: SCI IVandCompaniticom CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESERWEFt OSFIOS COMPANIES. OMPANTHE SOLE PROPECN R SFIO COF TFIEES,ICIMEN TS IS FORM UCTON OR REUSE OF T IOIOFI ROM SA.D coEN mum U(WRITTEN P@iMIS510N FROM SAND fAMPM11E5, W. PROJECT NO- 4W3()() O .DY: JAV.fdO .KIXEOw: RIffNINGS OATS RENSED MTE --- SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.2 0 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- PLANNING CASE NO. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEENN that ger la and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: g the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal hearing on Tuesday, January 4, 2005, newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers mended. in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700Market 7 Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. _o to consider a request for Concept was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Planned Unit Development for commercial, office and multi -family Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of development on approximately 22 the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both acres of property located on the inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition northwestcornerofLymanBlvd. and and publication of the Notice: the future realigned Highway 101. y Applicant Sand Companies, Inc. abcdefghijklmnopgrstuv � xyz A plan showing the location of the (`►�isuivJ/\i/! proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing to A. Hartmann andexpress theiropinions withrespect to this proposal. Kathryn Aanenson, Community Development Director Subscribed and sworn before me on Email: kaanensonRci ch a n Phone: 952-227-1139 (Published in the Chanhassen- Villager on Thursday, December 23, this day of 2004 OWEN M. RADUENZ 2004; No. 4326) 0 NOTMYK6tIC MINNESOTA Mf Cullr ggw E*nG Jan. 31,2M Notary Public JP=^ RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $22.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $22.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $10.85 per column inch ISCANNEO 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 0 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 23, 2004, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Concept PUD, Sand Companies, Inc. — Planning Case No. 05-01 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me thisL;60 day ofh e 1 , 2004. A'J�' Notary ,CAAAAAAAAAAMAMM �'ammivv 'ss��es�2�OD5G SCANNED Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development for Proposal: commercial, office and multi -family development on approximately 22 acres of property Planning File: 05-01 Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Property Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Blvd. and the Location: future realigned Highway 101. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Comments: or e-mail kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development for Proposal: commercial, office and multi -family development on approximately 22 acres of property Plannin File: 05-01 Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Property Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Blvd. and the Location: future realigned Highway 101. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead • public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Comments: or e-mail kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure; • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Altera' Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the I= Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified o application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciavindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard, Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Plannina Staff person named on the notification. 0 Thus map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is tel intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, infomstion and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other souses regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference Purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent Nat the GIS Data can be used for navigasona, tracking or any other Nrpcse requiring i acting measurement of thstance or direction or precison in the depiction 01 geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-22]-110]. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §4M.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of tis map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and eVressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold nearness the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or thirtl Parties which arise an of the users axes or use 0 data provided. This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not irdendad to be used as one. This map is a conpiladon of records, Infomstion and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not emrram that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and Me City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for nahgational, backing or any other purpose requinng eaading measurement of distance or direction or precision in Me depiction of geographic features. If more or discrepancies are found pease contact 952-22]-110]. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subc. 21 (2000), and Me usual of MIs msp acknowledges that Me City shaft not be liable for any damages, and etpressty waives all dams, and agrees to defend, inderinity, and hold harmless the City from any and all darts brought by User, its employees or agents, or Mind parses which ansa out of the users access or use ot data provided. 0 CHRISTOPHER T & AIMEE J ADAMS 8690 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT F & KAREN L ANDERSON 8561 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG R & GERALDINE BARETTE 8695 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TERRY LEE & MARI T BERANAK 8576 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EDWARD S & NANCY J COUGHLIN 587 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK A & LAURENE FARRELL 801 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS P HAGMAN & SUSAN M BARTENETTI 625 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DANIEL M & MELISSA L HERZOG 8790 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RONALD G & JOYCE L HORR 8513 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RICHARD C & SUSAN M AMBERSON 8549 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG A & MICHELLE D ALINE 8705 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 R STEVEN & MAURA BARNETT 8709 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOSHUA E & CORA L CONKLIN 8990 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES A CURRY 6105 EDEN PRAIRIE RD #17 EDINA MN 55436 JASON J GILBERTSON & KATJA J EAN N E R ET 583 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HUSSAM HASSOUN 8537 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER & DEBORA K HOL 8687 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRIAN W & KRISTIN A HOULE 880 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 MICHAEL B & CATHERINE ANDERSON 8709 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RUSSELL G BAHENSKY 8552 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WILLIAM E BENSON 8596 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ALAN COSENTINO & SHERRI BEIER 8572 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NORMAN &JACQUELINE ENGEL 8699 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG D GUTSCHOW & BARBARA J CLAYTON 8691 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGORY J & SUSAN L HENKEL 8699 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TROY & JENNIFER HOLASEK 8556 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BENJAMIN R K & DONNA M JOHNSON 8521 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICIA JOHNSON SHANNON G & MICHELLE A KERN LAWRENCE C & ELIZABETH KLEIN 8715 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 607 SUMMERFIELD DR 9170 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 AL & M J KLINGELHUTZ TRUST C/O ALOYSIUS & M J KLINGELHUTZ 8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANTHONY LARSON & LINDSAY NELSON 8545 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HARLAN C LEOPOLD 8553 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID S & JANICE A LUNDQUIST 8705 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL G & KAREN L MCNEIL 8695 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TIMOTHY S & TAMARA S MILLER 579 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL W & ANA E MORENO 603 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVE J & MARY A PAN ENO 8564 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY A & MICHELLE M REITAN 8900 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK S & TRACY L KURVERS 8560 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DENNIS H & RUTH L LAUFENBURGER 8673 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LONG LI & YING Z WANG 8557 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SO VAN LY & SUSAN YKUN UNG 8509 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CYNTHIA ANN MILLER 891 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK L & KIM M MISMASH 591 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CRAIG L & PATRICIA A MULLEN 611 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SEONGWOO PARK & MIN JEONG HAN 8580 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL & MELISSA ROHRMOSER 8698 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 MARK R & STACEY G LAKOSKY 8533 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KHANH & KHIEM LE 631 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 ROBERT B MARTINOVICH & PATRICIA A MARTINOVICH 8592 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREG ALLAN MILLER 8801 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LISA K MOORE 8682 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC S & JULIE A OYEN 615 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PHOULITHAT PHANDANOUVONG & VATSANA PHANDANOUVONG 8529 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RAYMOND J BOOB JR & CHAE SUK BOOB 8584 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS A & GRETA K ROSE JEFFREY A & TANYA L SCHNEIDER PAUL C SCHNI TLER & WARD KATE D WARD 8541 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8702 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 599 SUMMERFIEELDLD CHANHASSEN MN 55353 17 11 AMY J SCHUETTE ETAL 8990 QUINN RD PO BOX 68 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DONALD T SINNIGER & MICHELE M ABEL 600 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES JONATHON SOMMERS & KAREN D ROGGE 8683 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SPRINGFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSN 7100 MADISON AVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 LESLIE E TIDSTROM 8679 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 UTPAL R VAIDYA & LEENA UTPAL VAIDYA 861 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KEITH E & LISA L SCHWEGLER 619 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID M SMITH & PATRICE N LUNDGREN-SMITH 8568 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & JODI L SOTEBEER 8565 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL MN 55155 ABBA J TREGOBOV & SUSANA P MACHADO-TREGOBOV 8714 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN H & RUTH M VANCE 8588 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK & KRISTINA SCHWENDINGER 8708 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JUDSON E & JILL C SNELL 8694 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CURTIS A & SUSAN M SPERLING 8525 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRUCE A & SHEILA M TANQUIST 8569 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP INC ATTN: TAX DEPT M/S 624 PO BOX 7028 BEDMINSTER NJ 07921 BRYAN J & LISA C VAN NINGEN 8686 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMI D WALKER CORY M & PAMELA S WATKINS FRANK T & MARY LOU WHALEY 8517 CHANHASSEN HLLS DR S 595 SUMMERFIELD DR 851 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 4, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Concept Planned Unit Development for commercial, office and multi -family development on approximately 22 acres of property located on the northwest corner of Lyman Blvd. and the future realigned Highway 101. Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Kathryn Aanenson, Community Development Director Email: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1139 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on December 23, 2004) SCANNED N w Q >L PARCEL #5 — — — — SETBACK — jy ' /,� /-� + x TOW ME , wl / X Q 1V-11 xLU / X</ / X / 48 APARTMENT TOWNH E / i i I + + I I rd / HOME5 3 5TORY O / BUILDING LOT OVERLU 1 -� PARKING 1 N GARAGE I w I R 1 CZ, I I � 1 I I I x� 8 II I 5; X 1 / � I I 1 I r r 3 iiI 5 I r MES J i / NORTH \y - - / / --/- NOTE: SETBACKS I I i / ,-� .1'' 50'-0" @ HWY #212 # 10 1 + --—; -- (Oil/ /--� �O 30'-0" ELSEWHERE i I z (I /'" �i PARCEL # I B : 2.71 ACRES I I z i � L PARCEL #IC: 2.19 ACRE5 \ J i i POND /' r •'L 01 LU Q i > ' /- zI � 0 ; I of 48 - APARTMENT HOMES 23 - TOWNHOME5 71 - TOTAL LIVING UNITS PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT '�"`` PARCELS # 5 SCALE: 1 11 = 40'-0 " ** **SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Bax 727 Waite Park MM 56387-0727 Oflke: (320) 202-3100 Fou (320) 202-3139 Website: www.SardCompanks.com E-MaU. SCI@SandCompanies.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION & THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHTECT UNDER THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: RICHARD A. HENNINGS REGISTRATION NO.: I2295 DATE: --- THESE DRAW,NGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAND COMPANIES, INC. ANY REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAND COMPANIES, INC. PROJECT NO.: 05-300 DRAWN BY: JAV/C.D,'O CHECKED BY: R. HENNINGS DATE: --- REVISED DATE: --- CHANHASSEN GATEWAY HOUSING PHASE I CHANHASSEN/ MN BUILDING LAYOUT PLAN A-0.1 2 BEDROOM 1034 5Q.FT. 2 BEDROOM 1034 5Q.FT. 182'-O" 2 BEDROOM 1034 5Q.FT. 2 BEDROOM 1034 5Q.FT. 3 BEDROOM 1469 5Q.FT. 3 BEDROOM 1382 5Q.Ff. 3 BEDROOM 1382 5Q.FT. FIRST FLOOR PLAN Gy 2 - ONE BEDROOM a 9 - TWO BEDROOM 5 - THREE BEDROOM I G - TOTAL PER FLOOR 48 - TOTAL 0Ai -S�ci Sand Companies, Inc. Ce..mue♦Pro@e[t,1M..Y="d•De"impo I 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waste Park, ,MW 56387-0727 Office. (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320) 202-3139 Website: www.SandConspani com E -Matz: SCI@SandCompanimcom I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION & THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: RICHARD A. HENNINGS REGISTRATION NO.: 12295 DATE: --- THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAND COMPANIES, INC. ANY REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMSSION FROM SAND COMPANIES, INC. PROJECT NO.: 05300 DRAWN BY: JAVtCDlO CHECKED BY: R. HENNINGS DATE: --- REVISED DATE: --- CHANHASSEN GATEWAY HOUSING PHASE I CHANHASSEN, MN FLOOR PLAN A-1.0 I BEDROOM MEGH STORAGE 889 SQ.FT. Tpry 2 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 1034 5Q.FT. 1034 5Q.FT. W RECEPT. MGR. OFFICE �O M N VES FOYER ELEV. ALOBBY MAIL 100-0' LOBBY } HALL I BEDROOM 802 5Q.Ff. 2 BEDROOM 1208 5Q.FT. 2 BEDROOM 1092 50.FT. 3 BEDROOM go 1498 50.FT. 3 BEDROOM 1469 5Q.FT. 3 BEDROOM 1382 5Q.Ff. 3 BEDROOM 1382 5Q.FT. FIRST FLOOR PLAN Gy 2 - ONE BEDROOM a 9 - TWO BEDROOM 5 - THREE BEDROOM I G - TOTAL PER FLOOR 48 - TOTAL 0Ai -S�ci Sand Companies, Inc. Ce..mue♦Pro@e[t,1M..Y="d•De"impo I 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waste Park, ,MW 56387-0727 Office. (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320) 202-3139 Website: www.SandConspani com E -Matz: SCI@SandCompanimcom I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION & THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: RICHARD A. HENNINGS REGISTRATION NO.: 12295 DATE: --- THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAND COMPANIES, INC. ANY REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMSSION FROM SAND COMPANIES, INC. PROJECT NO.: 05300 DRAWN BY: JAVtCDlO CHECKED BY: R. HENNINGS DATE: --- REVISED DATE: --- CHANHASSEN GATEWAY HOUSING PHASE I CHANHASSEN, MN FLOOR PLAN A-1.0 FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION *s-ci Sand Companies, Inc. 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park, MAT 563 8 7-0 72 7 Office: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320) 202-3139 Website: www.SandCompanies.com E -Mail. SCI®SandCompaniescom I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION 8 THAT I AM A DULY UCENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: RICHAiDA.HENNJINGS REGISTRATION NO.: 12295 DATE: --- THESE --THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFDATIONIS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAND COMPANIES, INC. ANY REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAND COMPANIES, INC. PROJECT NO.: 05-3w DRAWN BY: JAV/CD/O CHECKED BY: R. FENNJINGS DATE: --- REVISED DATE: --- CHANHASSEN GATEWAY HOUSING PHASE I CHANHASSEN, MN FLOOR PLAN A-2.0 Sand Companies Land Use Detail Map PROPOSED TAX CREDIT PROJECT Options to Consider Chanhassen, Minnesota Consider waiver of a portion of the Z t 3be Density Bonuses tvc t��J Summary of Project Characteristics: -- �&nimally reduce see -Ib 7 Minimally reduce parking /' n O r Number of Units: 47 to 55 Allow us to rivate ve to the site Building Type: 3 story wood frame with underground parking Target Market: Working Families Flexibility in Standards Income Restrictions: 60% or less of Area Median Income 2005 Income Limits for Carver County: Household of 2 $36,960 Fee Wavier or a Portion Household of 3 $41,580 Household of 4 $46,200 Tax Increment Financing Household of 5 $49,920 Gross Rents: 50% or less of Area Median Income 2005 Rent Limits for Carver County: I Bedroom $721.00 2 Bedroom $866.00 3 Bedroom $1,001.00 Participation Options for City: Participation Method Options to Consider Waiver of Assessments Consider waiver of a portion of the assessment relating to the Gap Project Density Bonuses Aliow slightly hi erensi _ Reduce Setbacks Parking Requirements -- �&nimally reduce see -Ib 7 Minimally reduce parking /' n O r Decrease Road Widths Allow us to rivate ve to the site versus a public road Flexibility in Standards perk with us on such things as flexibility in the building materials (using rock face block & siding vs. brick/stucco) Fee Wavier or a Portion City SAC/WAC $225,000 (51 units) Park Dedication $158,000 (51 units) Tax Increment Financing Establish a district and do a pay -as -you TIF 1*•SCI Sand Companies, Inc MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY 2005 HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM SELF -SCORING WORKSHEET FOR SELECTION POINTS Development Name: Address: City: Please indicate below the selection and/or preference priority points expected for your development. Where multiple points per section are available please check the appropriate box (0) for points claimed. The MHFA will determine actual selection points used, based on the application and additional documentation you have submitted to justify the points claimed. (Attach separate details sheet). Please Note: If submitting an electronic version of the application, you must also submit a signed original paper Self -Scoring Worksheet for Selection Points (HTC Form 10) with your application package. The scores reflected on both submissions must be identical. You must also be sure both sheets identically reflect all supporting detail information as called for on the sheets. Only the signed original Self - Scoring Worksheet for Selection Points that accompanies the application will be reviewed and considered as the controlling document. Do not claim points if you do not/cannot provide documentation to justify the points claimed. Please Note: Deed Restricted Covenants covering the rent restrictions and occupancy requirements presented at selection will be placed on the building(s) at the time of allocation. ROUND 1=MINIMUM THRESHOLD REQUIREMENTS For applications submitted in Round 1 all applicants statewide must meet one of the following threshold types. If you are applying to Round 1, please indicate the Threshold item you meet: a. In the Metropolitan Area: 1. FM New construction or substantial rehabilitation in which, for the term of the extended use period (term of the Declaration of Lind Use Restrictive Covenants), at least 75 percent of the total tax credit units are single room occupancy units which we affordable to households whose income does not exceed 30 percent of the area median income. 2. � New Construction or substantial rehabilitation family housing projects that are not restricted to persons 55 years old or older in which, for the term of the extended use period (term of the Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants), at least 75 percent of the total tax credit units contain two or more bedrooms and at least one-third of the 75 percent contain three or more bedrooms; or 3. 0 Substantial rehabilitation projects in neighborhoods targeted by the city for revitalization. b. Outside the Metropolitan Area: 1. O❑ Projects which meet a locally identified housing need and which are in short supply in the local housing market as evidenced by credible data such as local council resolution submitted with the application. (For Threshold Letter - Sample Format, see HTC Procedural Manual, Reference Materials Index.) c. Projects that are not restricted to persons of a particular age group and in which, for the term of the extended use period (term of the Declaration of land Use Restrictive Covenants), a percentage of the units are set aside and rented to persons: 1. = with a serious and persistent mental illness as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 245.462, Subdivision 20, paragraph (c); 2. F -L-1-1 with a developmental disability as defined in United States Code, Title 42, Section 6001, paragraph (5), as amended; 3. 0 who have been assessed as drug dependent persons as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 254A.02, Subdivision 5, and are receiving or will receive care and treatment services provided by an approved treatment program as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 254A.02, Subdivision 2; 4. FE -111 with a brain injury as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 256B.093, Subdivision 4, paragraph (a); or 5. © with permanent physical disabilities that substantially limit major life activities, if at least 50 percent of the units in the project are accessible as provided under Minnesota Rules chapter. 1340; d. ® Projects, whether or not restricted to persons of a particular age group, which preserve existing subsidized housing, if the use of tax credits is necessary to (1) prevent conversion to market rate use or (2) to remedy physical deterioration of the project which would result in loss of existing federal subsidies; or e. ® Projects financed by Rural Development, which meet statewide distribution goals. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 1 of 14 (HTC Form 10) MHR Fonn 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 6/2004 Housing Tax Credit Program 2005 Self -Scoring Worksheet Selection Priorities Developer Claimed XHIFA Awarded 1. Large Family housing 10 Points e proposal is for a project that provides family housing that is not restricted to persons 55 years old or lder. At least 75 percent of the total tax credit units must contain two or more bedrooms. The tenant lection plan must give preference to families with minor children. To receive these points, the project must meet HTC Design Standards including the design requirements or Large Family Housing. Compliance must be evidenced by a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect. Note: If points are claimed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the selection priority categories of Single Room Occupancy Housing or Special Populations. 2. Single Room Occupancy Housing 10 Points At least 50% of the total tax credit units must be one bedroom or less with rents affordable to households hose incomes do not exceed 30 percent of AMI. Scores based on gross rent level including utilities fore rental assistance. Eligible units must have rents affordable to households whose incomes do not exceed 30 percent of median income without rental assistance. To receive these points, the project must meet the HTC Design Standards and be evidenced by a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect. Note: If points are claimed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the selection priority categories of Large Family Housing or Special Populations. 3. Strategically Targeted Resources 10 To 12 Points ❑ The proposal is for the rehabilitation of an existing structure 10 points Note that for all HTC Rehabilitation proposals: the amount of rehabilitation must exceeds: (a) $5,000 per low-income unit for the project; and the greater of (b) $3,000 qualified basis per low-income unit per building; or (c) 10 percent of the adjusted basis. A qualified preservation project that receives full points for `Preserved Federally Assisted Low Income Housing" may qualify if rehabilitation exceeds the greater of (b) or (c) above. Calculation is based on rehabilitation hard costs and cannot include intermediary costs or soft costs identified in the application; plans and/or scope of work provided at time of application. Fa The rehabilitation proposal is part of a community revitalization or stabilization plan. 2 additional points Must be evidenced by a letter from the city verifying that the proposed project is part of an approve community revitalization area as established by resolution or other legal action. -OR- The proposal is for new construction and will utilize existing sewer and water lines without substantial extensions. 10 Points To receive these points, the project must meet the HTC Design Standards and be evidenced by a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 2 of la (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 612004 Housing Tax Credit Program 2005 Self -Scoring worksheet Selection Priorities Developer Claimed MHFA Awarded 4. Special Populations 3 to 10 Points Projects that are not restricted to persons of a particular age group and in which, for the term of the extended use period (Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants), a percentage of the units are set aside and rented to persons with the following disabilities: a) a serious and persistent mental illness as defined in Minn. Stat § 245.462, subdivision 20, paragraph (c); a developmental disability as defined in United States Code, Title 42, Section 6001, paragraph (5), as amended; c) assessed as drug dependent as defined in Minn. Stat § 254A.02, subdivision 5, and are receiving or will receive care and treatment services provided by an approved treatment program as defined in Minn. Stat § 254A.02, Subdivision 2. d) a brain injury as defined in Minn. Stat. § 2566.093, Subdivision 4, paragraph (a); or e) permanent physical disabilities that substantially limit major life activities, if at least 50 percent of the units in the project are accessible as provided under Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1340. A project in which at least 50 percent of the total wits are set aside and rented to such persons: l0 points OR- A project in which at least 25 percent of the total wits are set aside and rented to such persons 3 points I a proposal sets aside a percentage of units for persons with disabilities, the applicant must contact the uman services department for the county where the project will be located to discuss the proposal. The plicant must obtain a letter from the human services department indicating that its staff has reviewed the proposed project, and stating whether there is a need for such housing and if the project would be eligible or funds to assist with the social service needs of the residents. In addition, if the project will be delivering supportive services to residents in these units, the proposal must include documentation describing: the scope of services residents will require, specific services the project will offer, whether the applicant will be responsible for delivery or will partner with identified organizations (and if so the status of those arrangements and partners' credentials), specific sources that will fund the services and their commitment status, and how residents will be connected to the services. To receive these points, the project must meet the HTC Design Standards and be evidenced by a Design Standards Certification form executed by the owner and architect. Note: If points are claimed/awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed/awarded from the selection priority categories of Large Family Housing or Single Room Occupancy Housing 5. Economic Integration 2 Points Two (2) Points will be awarded for the election of 25-50% percent of units affordable to households with rents at or below 60 percent of the area median income to the total units (not including full-time manager r model units) in the project: The corresponding HTC applicable fraction will be based on the number of HTC low income units to total d will be enforced at the time the Carryover Allocation and IRS Form 8609 are prepared to determine e maximum tax Credit allocation for the project. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 3 of 14 (HTC Form 10) MHR Fonn 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 6/2004 Housing Tax Credit Program 2005 Self -Scoring Worksheet Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 6. Cooperatively Developed Plan : to 10 Points City comprehensive plans alone do not qualify for the options below. ❑ The proposal is created in accordance with a comprehensive cooperatively developed plan that encompasses housing plus services and/or economic related initiatives. - 10 points Eligible plans include: • Saint Paul - Ramsey County Five -Year Low Income Housing and Homeless Services Plan; • Minneapolis Hennepin County Homeless Plan r other plans that include housing plus services and/or economic development initiatives -OR- FU The proposal is created in accordance with a cooperatively developed plan, which incorporates housing initiatives. - 5 points At a minimum, any combination of the above most have the input of the following entities: • City or county (or instrumentality thereof) OR • Regional Unit of Government AND one or more of the following: • Neighborhood and/or community group • Housing provider • Funders 7. Rental Assistance 4 to 18 Points Priority is given to an owner that has entered into negotiations with a Local Housing Authority to receive Project Based Rental Assistance. The assisted units must be located in buildings on the project site. For he purpose of this section, if a proposal contains existing Project Based Assisted units, these units ill be counted towards meeting required Rental Assistance percentages. Rent for assisted units must be at or below FMRs (or appropriate payment standard for the project area). Receiving these points and agreeing to a minimum number of assisted units does not release owners from their obligations under the Minnesota Human Rights Act and Section 42 prohibiting refusal to lease to the older of a voucher or certificate of eligibility under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 cause of the status of the prospective tenant as such a holder. current request for MHFA HTF Rental Assistance will not receive rental assistance points A past award r existing HTF Rental Assistance will be counted toward meeting required the Rental Assistance percentages. Indicate the applicable combinations of the below components. Points for A and B cannot be ]aimed in combination. Fa (A) For developments agreeing to set aside at least 20 percent of the total units for project based rental assistance — 10 points. (B) For developments agreeing to set aside at least 10 percent but under 20 percent of the total units for the project based rental assistance — 6 points. (C) For selected components A or B above, if, in addition, the above commitments are coupled with a commitment from the HRA to provided the project based assistance for a minimum 10 year contract term — 4 points. (D) For developments that cooperatively develop a housing plan to provide other rental assistance (e.g. Section 8, portable tenant based, HUD Operating Subsidy or other similar programs approved by the Agency) to meet the existing need as evidenced at application by a letter of intent signed by both the applicant and the local housing authority. — 4 points. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 4 of a (HTC Fonn 30) MMR Fonn 310 Multifamity Housing Resource 6/2004 Housing Tax Credit Program 2005 Sea -Scoring Worksheet Minnesota Mousing Rnanoe Agency 5 of 14 (MfC Form 10) MMR Form 310 Multifamily Mousing Resource 5/2004 Mousing Tan Credit Program 2005 Self -Scoring Worksheet Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded (Selection Priority 9_ continued) ❑ Flexibili in site development standards ❑ Flexibility in zoning code reflutremeatts ❑ WAC/SAC reductions ❑ Fast -[tack '[tin and approval ❑ Innovative budding techniques or materials Provide specific cost savings amounts and details to justify points claimed If land donation of the development site, monetary/in-kind work and materials donations, or donation/waiver of development specific assessments or infrastructure costs are claimed for points in this section, it cannot also be claimed in the selection points category of Local Contributions. Assistance from the MHFA Super RFP and related Funding Partners i.e. Family Housing Fund, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentive Account, IS NOT eligible for inclusion in this section To receive these points, documentation of the terms and conditions of a cost avoidancelcost reduction measure must be provided from the contributor of the assistance or authorized local official, at the time of the application. The documentation shall be in the form of a development specific letter of intent, city or council resolution, letter of approval, statement of agreement or eligibility, or memorandum f understanding. If the documentation provided contains words synonymous with "consider" or "may", (as in "may award') regarding the cost avoidance/cost reduction measure, the points will not be awarded. Documentation from an engineer, architect or certified contractor or provider for innovative wilding techniques or materials must be submitted at the time of application and be reviewed and approved by the Agency to be eligible for the points. The applicant must provide accurate, complete and credible evidence of the amount of cost savings for each cost avoidancetcost reduction measure and record the savings in Section VD E. of the MF Application Form. The value of the donations and in—kind contributions most be consistent with current market comparable costs for land materials and services 10. Local Contributions 2 to 10 Points EEIT The proposal is receiving funds from an area employer. — 4 points. ❑ 1 The proposal is receiving funds from the local municipality. — 4 points Funds from local municipalities may include, for example: •,Tax increment financing • Reservation land not subject to local property taxes • Historic tax credits • Monetary grants • Tax abatement • Land donation of the development site The o sal receives funds from a private philanthropic group, religious organization, or charitable organization. — 2 points Provide specific details to justify points claimed If land donation of the development site, monetary/in-kind work and material donations, or onationtwaiver of development specific assessments or infrastructure costs is claimed for points in this section, it cannot also be claimed in the selection points category of Cost Avoidance/Cost Reduction. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 6 of 14 (HrC Form 10) MHR Form 310 MUltifarnRy Housing Resource 6/2004 Housing Tam Credit Program 2005 Self -Scoring Worksheet _ ection Priorities _ _ - - - - - Developer Claimed MHFA' Awarded (Selection Priority 10. continued) o qualify for points using historic credits and tax abatement, there must be satisfactory documentation at the resource will provide additional positive investment capital to the development that will reduce the errands on the state and federal housing resources. For tax increment financing to qualify for points, there must be satisfactory documentation that the resource is committed to the development at the time of plication. Documentation of the amount and the terms of assistance must be provided by the provider of e assistance at the time of application in the form of a development specific letter of intent. The value of e donations must be consistent with current market comparable costs for materials and services. Within months of the date of selection(MlIFA Board selection date) the applicant must provide the MHFA with ocumentation of a firm commitment, authorization or approval of the local contribution(s). The 'cum entaticn must state the amount, terms and conditions and be executed or approved at a minimum by e contributor. Documentation containing words synonymous with "consider" or "may", (as in "may ward") regarding the contribution, will not be considered acceptable. Lack of acceptable documentation 71 result in the reevaluation and adjustment of the tax credits or RFP award, up to and including the total recapture of tax credits or RFP funds. 11. Leverage 2 to 10 Points Points are awarded for leveraging requested state deferred funding with funding from private, federal, Kcal government, religious, philanthropic, or charitable organizations. The formula used to determine the Leverage Ratio Percentage is based upon the cumulative state deferred funding award (including current request) for MHFA RFP funds* divided by Total Development Cost. *(including past and present MHFA and Funding Partners [i.e. Family Housing Fund, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentive Account] awards and current requests) and excludin First Mortgage, Syndication, HOME, MARIF funds). Total state RFP/Funding Partner Funds awarded and current request divided by Total Development Cost equals Leverage Ratio 0 0-20% = 10 pts Q❑ 21-30%= 8 pts Q❑ 31-40%= 6 pts FU 41-50%=4pts ® 51-60%=2pts 61 and above = 0 pts Documentation of the amount and the terms of assistance must be provided from the provider of the assistance at the time of application in the form of a development specific letter of intent. Within 6 months of the date of selection (MHFA Board selection date), the applicant must provide the MHFA with documentation of a firm commitment for each funding source. The documentation must state the amount, terms and conditions and be executed or approved by the lender or contributor and the applicant. Documentation containing words synonymous with "consider' or "may", (as in "may award") regarding e commitment will not be considered acceptable. Lack of acceptable documentation will result in the reevaluation and adjustment of the tax credits or RFP award, up to and including the total recapture of tax credits or RFP funds. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency r of 14 (HTC Fonn 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 612004 Housing Tax Credit Program 2005 Self -Scoring Worksheet Selection Priorities Developer MHFA Claimed Awarded 12. Readiness to Proceed 2 to 10 Points The MHFA shall award points to applicants who have secured funding commitments for funding for one r more funding sources at the time of application (commitments for funding from MHFA and Funding _ Partners (i.e. Family Housing Fond Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentive Account) are only included if obtained in a previous funding cycletround). The documentation most state the amount, terms and conditions and be executed or approved by the lender or contributor and the applicant. Documentation containing words synonymous with "consider' or "may", (as in "may award's regarding the commitment will not be considered acceptable. (Excludes Syndication Proceeds and First Mortgage Financing) Total eligible funding secured, awarded or committed Divided by Total Development Cost equals Percentage of Fonds Committed 60% or more of funding secured, awarded or committed 10 points 30% to 59.9% of funding secured, awarded or committed 6 points 10% to 29.9% of funding secured, awarded or committed 2 point ❑ 9.9% and below of funding secured, awarded or comnutted 0 points 13. Intermediary Costs (Soft Costs) 1 to 6 Points Points will be given to projects with the lowest intermediary costs on a sliding scale based on percentage f total mortgageable costs. For HTC selected projects, this percentage will be enforced at issuance of the S Form 8609. Intermediary cost amount: divided by Total Mortgageable Costs Equals Intermediary Percentage 0.0-15% 6 points ❑ 15.1-20% 3 points ❑ 20.1-25% 2points ❑ 25.1-30% 1 point ❑ 30.1% & over 0 points 14. Unacceptable Practices -10 to -25 Points HFA will impose penalty points for unacceptable practices as identified in Section W.F. of the Housing Tax Credit Procedural Manual. 15. Eventual Tenant Ownership 1 Point The proposal incorporates a financially viable plan to transfer 100 percent of the HTC unit ownership at e end of the initial 15-year compliance period from the initial ownership entity (or MHFA approved "Transfer of Ownership") of the project (the limited Partnership) to tenant ownership. The unit purchase price at time of sale must be affordable to incomes meeting HTC eligibility requirements. To be eligible, the buyer must have an HTC qualifying income at the time of initial occupancy (HTC rental tenant) or time of purchase. The plan must incorporate a Limited Partnership ownership exit strategy and the provision of services including home ownership education and training. The Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants will contain provisions ensuring compliance with these home ownership program commitments by the Limited Partnership Owner. (Refer also to Section V. W. of the HTC Procedural Manual for additional information.) Until the time the HTC units are purchased by a qualified tenant or in the event the HTC units are not acquired by a qualified tenant, the owner will extend the duration of low income use for the full extended use period (30 years). The owner therefore, agrees to waive provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(EXi)(H) and 42(h)(6)(F) and xtends the duration o[ low income use of the project, and shall not also claim points under the `Extended Duration' Preference Priority. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 9 of 14 (HTC Fonn 10) MMR Fonn 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 6/2009 Housing Tax Credit Program 2005 Self -Scoring Worksheet 16. Underserved Populations 3 to 10 Points e development serves an underserved population as defined by the Agency as Single Female head of ousehold with minor children, Individuals and Households of Color and one of the following is true: ❑ Marketing efforts or project design features will be used that will attract underserved populations (as defined by the Agency) including collaborations and partnerships proposed with members or organizations addressing the needs of underserved populations? 3 points OR ❑ Marketing efforts or project design features will be used that will attract underserved populations (as defined by the Agency) including collaborations and partnerships proposed with members or organizations addressing the needs of underserved populations; and the applicant has past successful experiences in marketing to or working with underserved populations? 1 Underserved Population = 5 points 2 Underserved population= 10 points (NOTE: see selection priority #4 for Disabled Individuals) _.z 17. Temporary Priority 3 Points The proposal addresses a temporary housing priority and is eligible for the award of points by the Commissioner or the Board of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency pursuant to authority cited in the Permanent Rules of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. 18. Preservation of Existing Housing Tax Credit Units 10 Points ORTANT NOTE - THESE POINTS ARE AVAILABLE ONLY TO EXISTING MHFA TAX CREDIT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR TAX CREDITS FROM MHFA'S COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION PROCESS (CONSOLIDATED RFP) and QUALIFIED TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR A PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM MHFA AS THE CREDIT ALLOCATOR. To obtain the related points, the existing tax credit housing must meet the following criteria: 1. The development received an MHFA allocation of housing tax credits either prior to 1990 or is eligible to and will exercise their option under the provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)(i)(Il) and 42(h)(6)(F) 'thin the next 12 months; and 2. Applicant agrees to maintain the Housing Tax Credit Units in the development for at least 30 years; and 3. The proposal will not result in the displacement of existing low and moderate income residents; and 4. Units most be considered at risk of going to market rents, where the market rents of comparable units exceed the tax credit rent limits by 10 percent and the proposed rents will increase by more than 30 percent thin two yews of the Housing Tax Credit Application date. The risk of conversion must be supported y information contained in the application and with final determinations made by MHFA; or 5. Tax credit units would no longer remain decent, safe, and affordable due to physical deterioration or deterioration of capacity of current ownership/management entity. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 9 M 14 (HTC Form 10) MHR Fonn 310 Multifamity Housing Resource 6/2004 Housing Tax Credit Program 2005 Self-Smring Worksheet Selection Priorities Developer MHFA .Claimed Awarded.- 19. Permanent Housing for Individuals Experiencing Long Term Homelessness (Nco in 2005) (5 to 110 Points) MHFA Competitive Round, Non -Tax Exempt Points ("bonus • points) 100 Points M EPA Competitive Round or Tax Exempt Points ("non-Renus" Points) 5 to 10 Points ORTANT NOTE THE 100 "BONUS" POINTS ARE AVAILABLE ONLY TO QUALIFIED PERMANENT HOUSING PROJECTS TARGETING INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCING LONG TERM HOMELESSNESS APPLYING FOR TAX CREDITS FROM MHFA'S COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION PROCESS (CONSOLIDATED RFP) QUALIFIED TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR A PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM MHFA AS THE CREDIT ALLOCATOR WILL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM AWARD OF 10 POINTS ("NON -BONUS" POINTS) FROM THIS POINT CATEGORY. QUALIFING PROPOSALS MUST CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF 4 UNITS SERVING HOMELESS HOUSEHOLDS. The 100 points ("bonus points") will be available until a total of $1,353,000' (estimated 25 percent MHFA authority) in tax credits are awarded for qualifying proposals for Persons Experiencing Long Term Homelessness selected in the 2005 Housing Tax Credit competitions. Once this maximum amount is reached, the 100 points ("bonus" points) will no longer be awarded to qualified proposals for the remaining 2005 Tax Credit Program competitive funding round. Qualified proposals may earn a maximum of 10 points ("non -bonus" points cited below) and may continue to compete in the appropriate set aside. The MHFA will promote housing for households experiencing long-term homelessness by giving reference points to proposals that meet all the following conditions: a) sets aside a percentage of housing tax credit units to (minimum 4 units) serving households experiencing long-term homelessness as proposed to be defined in Minnesota Rule, Chapter 4900.3705; b) addresses an unmet need and fits with the Continuum of Care goals and action steps intended to address homelessness as identified in the Exhibit I Plan Housing Gaps Analysis and described i the Continuum of Care Narrative submitted to HUD; c) provides a plan for resident support services (i.e. information and referral, advocacy, case management, self-reliance training, resident association and community building activities) contingent upon an agreement with an established organization providing such services to residents and financial plans demonstrating feasibility; d) provides a service budget which supports the plan; e) provides an executed memorandum of understanding between the owner, lead service provider and property management which outlines the duties and responsibilities of each, and; f) the applicant agrees to pursue and continue renewal of rental assistance, operating subsidy, or service funding contracts for as long as the funding is available. Additional points ("non -bonus" points) will be awarded to a proposal in which a certain percentage (rounded up to the next full unit) of the total units are set aside and rented to household experiencing long erm homelessness: 5% to 10%, but no fewer than 4 units = 5 points. 50 % to 100%, but no fewer than 20 units = 10 points. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 10 of 14 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 6/2004 Housing Tax Credit Program 2005 Self -Scoring Worksheet Selection Priorities Developer _ (Selection Pnong19. continued) o receive points under this category, an applicant are required to complete and submit with the application materials, the Narratives, Forms and Submissions outlined in Part F of the Supportive Housing Section of the Housing Resource Application Guide and Checklist. Materials include, but not limited to, a plan outlining the services to be provided, a budget to support the plan, and such other items as are required by the MHFA for applications serving persons experiencing long-term homelessness. e MHFA recognizes that rental, operating, and service assistance may be necessary to effectively serve ouseholds experiencing long-term homelessness. The development must maintain a priority for serving ouseholds experiencing long term homelessness in conformance with the conditions and terms of the financing, operating subsidy, or rental assistance supporting the homeless households. After the term of the minimum rent subsidy period has elapsed, in the event that necessary rental assistance, operating upport, or tenant service funding is withdrawn or terminated due to reasons not attributable to the actions r inactions of the borrower, a development that is in full compliance with all the terms of the funding, may be permitted to phase out the targeting of tax credit units to persons experiencing long -tern omelessness and convert the rents, over a three year period, to the 50% tax credit rent limit without jeopardizing the tax credit allocation. The 50% tax credit rent and minimum income set aside limits elected for the project by the owner must be maintained for the remainder of the tax credit compliance period and extended use period to retain the tax credit allocation. 0. High Speed Internet Access (New in 2005) 1 Point The development will provide High Speed Internet access via installation of all appropriate cable and connections to every unit in the development. This will be a design requirement if points are taken. Preference Priorities Developer Claimed NHIFA Awarded 1. Extended Duration 3 Points The proposal extends the duration of low-income use for the longest period (30 years). Points are awarded to projects where the owner agrees to waive provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)(i)(m and 42(h)(6)(F) and extend the duration of low-income use of the project. The owner agrees that the provisions of Section 42(h)(6)(E)O(H) and 42(h)(6)(F) (which provision would rmit the owner to terminate the restrictions under this agreement at the end of the compliance period in the event the MHFA does not present the owner with a qualified contract for the acquisition of the project) o not apply to the project, and that the Section 42 income and rental restrictions shall apply for the period f 30 years beginning with the first day of the compliance period in which the building is a part of a qualified low income housing project. To receive these points, the primary financing proposed must meet HFA's underwriting standards or demonstrate to the sole satisfaction of the MHFA that the project can remain financially feasible for the entire 30 year duration of low income use. For Tax Exempt applications for tax credits where MHFA is the allocating agency for the credits, e development is required to commit to an extended use period of 30 years. If points are claim / awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed / awarded from the lection priority category of Eventual Tenant Ownership. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 11 of 14 (HTC Fom 10) MHR Fonn 310 Mulnfamity Housing Resource 6/2004 Housing Tan Credit Program 2005 Self -Scoring Worksheet Preference Priorities Developer Claimed MHFA Awarded 2. Serves Lowest Income Tenants/Rent Reduction 5 to 13 Points Scores based on gross rent level including utilities before rental assistance. Eligible units must have rents fordable to households whose incomes do not exceed 30 percent or 50 percent of median income without ental assistance. In addition to the elected income limit of 50 percent or 60 percent AMI for the full term of the declaration (refer to the Minimum Set Aside), the applicant agrees to maintain deeper rent structuring for which selection points are requested. Units Representing percent of the HTC units will have additional rent restrictions requiring rents affordable to households at 30 percent AMI (Rent Restrictions 30 percent) Units Representing 100 percent of the HTC units will have additional rent restrictions requiring rents ordable to households at 50 percent AMI (Rent Restrictions 50 percent) Applicants may choose either option I or 2, and at your choice, option 3 for the development. This selection will restrict rents only (tenant incomes will not be restricted to the 50 percent or 30 percent income level by claiming points in this section). 0 Option I- A project in which 100 percent of the HTC unit rents are at the county 50 percent HUD area median rent limit. (10 points) Q❑ Option 2 - A project in which at least 50 percent of the HTC unit rents are at the county 50 percent HUD area median rent limit. (5 points) OR ® Option 3 - In addition to Option I & 2, a project that further restricts 30 percent of the above Restricted units to the county 30 percent HUD area median rent limit. (additional 3 points) NOTE: If points are claimed / awarded for this category, then no points may be claimed / awarded from the selection priority category of Rental Assistance for the same units. EU =OR—TAN—Tl All 50 percent rent restricted units must meet the 50 percent area median rent for a minimum of five years. After the first five year period has expired rent may be increased to the 60 percent rent limit over a three year period with increases not to exceed the amount listed in the table below All 30 percent rent restricted units must meet the 30 percent area median rent for a minimum of five years. After the first five-year period has expired rent may be increased to the 40 percent rent limit over a three-year period with increases not to exceed the amount listed in the table below. % of 50 % of 30 Year Rent Levels Rent Levels 1-5 30% of 50% 30% of 30% 6 30% of 53% 30% of 33% 7 30% of 57% 30% of 37% 8 30% of 60% 30% of 40% NIHFA will incorporate these restrictions into the project's Declaration of Land Use Restrictive Covenants. The applicant must demonstrate to sole satisfaction of MHFA that the project can achieve these reduced rents and remain a financially feasible project, IRC 42(m)(2). Points are contingent upon financial plans demonstrating feasibility, positive cash flow on a 15-year pro forma and gaining MHF management approval (for management, operational expenses, and cash Flow assumptions). Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 12 of 14 (HTC Form 10) MHR Form 310 Multifamily Housing Resource 6/2004 Housing Tax Credit Progmm 2005 Self -Scoring Worksheet Preference Priorities Developer Claimed -, 3. Preservation of Federally Assisted Units (Non -Tax Exempt, MHFA Credit Ceiling, Competitive Round Projects) 10 Points (Tax Exempt, Non-MHFA Credit Ceiling, Non-competitive Round Projects) 10 Points [IMPORTANT NOTE: THESE POINTS ARE AVAILABLE ONLY TO QUALIFYING NON -TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR TAX CREDITS FROM MHFA'S COMPETITIVE ALLOCATION PROCESS (CONSOLIDATED RFP) and QUALIFIED TAX EXEMPT PROJECTS APPLYING FOR A PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM MHFA AS THE CREDIT ALLOCATOR. (Provide specific details to iustifv points claimed) DEFINITION - Any housing receiving project based rental assistance, operating subsidies, or mortgage nterest reduction payments. The universe includes public housing, Section 236 and Section 221(d)(3) interest reduction payments, and any development with a project based Section 8, rent supplement, or ental assistance payments contract. Preserves federally assisted low income housing which, due to mortgage prepayments or expiring rental assistance, would convert to market rate use or due to physical deterioration or deterioration of capacity of current ownership/management entity would lose its federal subsidies. MHFA, at its sole discretion, must agree that a market exists for a conversion to market rate housing. In order to obtain the related points, the federally assisted housing must meet the following criteria: 1 Units must be considered at risk of losing assistance within two years of the Housing Tax Credit Application date as supported by information contained in the application and with final determinations made by MHFA. Applicant must agree to continue renewals of existing project based housing subsidy payment contract for as long as the assistance is available. Applicant must agree to maintain the Housing Tax Credit Units in the development for at least 30 ears. Except for "good cause", applicant must not evict existing subsidized residents and must continue t new leases for those residents. 4. QCT/Community Revitalization 1 Point point is awarded to projects that are located in a Qualified Census Tract (See Qualified Census Tract — Reference Materials Index) and are part of a concerted plan that provides for community revitalization. This must be evidenced by a letter from the city verifying that the proposed project is part of an approved community revitalization area as established by resolution or other legal action. TOTAL POINTS Developer _ MHFA Claimed 1 1 Awarded Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 13 of 14 (HTC Form 10) MHR Fonn 310 Mulnfamity Housing Resource 6/2004 Housing Tax Cmda program 2005 Self -Scoring Worksheet Under penalty of oeriury, Owner hereby certifies the information provided herein is true and accurate. 13% Of: Its: Name of Owner: (Signature) (Name of Legal Entity) (Title)(Managing General Partner) (Print or type name of signatory) a Ir,so[a r nar.-� t,rrcy 14 of 14 (HTC Form 10) MHR Forth 310 MuRdaindy Housing Rnscurre 6/2004 Housing Tax Cnndd ,F, ram 20nl' 05 SO e:nrk;h=et V / POW a' e �• fir® I 4 I Z . t9 KI I OI b Z 4T 3I 1 of o i w � N >I irl 1 1 I I I 2 NORTH TOTE: 5ETBACK5 50'-0' Q H WY #212 4 # 101 39-0' EL5EWHERE 51 - APARTMENT HOME5 22 - TOWNHOMES 73 - TOTAL LIVING UNIT5 4.91 ACRE5 - PARCEL#1 1.2 ACRES - PARCEL#5 G. I I ACRE5 = 1 1 .95 UNITS / ACRE PRELIMINARY 51TE LAYOUT PARCELS #I * #5 5CALE: I. = I00'I ❖SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 336 Sauth Tenth Avenue PO Bos 717 Waite Park MN'S6387-0727 Office: (320) 202-3100 Far (320) 202-3139 Website: w .SaJdCompanumcom E -Mail: SCIgSandCampanimcom CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 '%HANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESE DPo INGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAND COMPANIES, INC. ANY REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THESE DOCUMENTS TS FOR&GDEli W RHOIIT WRITTEN PERMISSION MOM SAND COMPANIES. INC. PROJECTNO.: Dfy011 DRA"BY: JAvcm CHECKED BY: R. MEANINGS DATE RMSED DATE: --- SAN D COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.1 PRELIMINARY 51TE LAYOUT PARCELS #3* #4 SCALE: I II = 100'-0" NOTE: 5ET15ACK5 50'-0'QHWY#212##101 - 30'-O' EL5EWHERE , G9 - APARTMENT HOME5 , 5.98 ACRE5 - PARCEL #4 / 1 1.54 UNITS / ACRE A2 / I � I , / WET LAND / I �i 3 STORY BUILDING OVER PARKING GARAGE --------------------- I Z LYMAN BOULEVARD 1•»9180 POND#I CAR WA5H I • 'sem D-.Neaacssa¢saaxalavae•se` aaNe��ke$,�cg, • e :��i�a�r •� ti 'X 3 •E OFFICE •STORYz I I 0 1 I 1 4ts--cl Sand Companies, Inc. 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Boz 717 Waite Park, MN 56387-0727 OJJ6:e: (310) 201-3100 Faz: (320) 202-3139 Website: www.SandCa patumco. E -Mail: SC]ga andCompanie co. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE SCI PROPERTY OF SAND COMPANIES. INC. ANY REPROCUCTION OR REUSE OF THESE DOGIMCNIS IS FOR&OOEN WRX'JUT WRITTEN PERMISSION ERW SAND COMPANIES. INC. PROJECT NO_ OL3tl1 DRAWN BY: JAVILUU CHEC6 Sy. R. HENNINGS OAT£ REVISED CAM ... SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.2 -- - \ PARCEL tS \ I \ T X ' 9T X/ /.. \ WI I / J C5 cj Ln ZI HOMES TMENT O 3 STORY O I BUILDIKI NG, OVER s:.;- O 1 � PARKING + NI i- _ i i GARAGE I w I L 70v 1 I 9 I I 1 CJI I ' sI'., TOT \\ LOT \\ TDWNHOAQ 3\ 1 \ I_ \ \ / f NORTH NOTE: 5ETBACK5 / 5O'-0• @ HWY #212 4 # 101 +— - --- i -Ir-- ------ --- ---- y n 1?--- -' 3a -O' EL5EWt1ERE / POND ' #2\ (� 51 - APARTMENT HOME5 �`' P� 22 - TOWNHOME5 - 3 I O 1 T�V" 73- TOTAL LIVING UNIT5 O I I 4.91 ACRE5 - PARCEL # I a I I / 1.2 ACRE5 - PARCEL#5 Z I �/ G.I I ACRE5= 11.95-UNIT5/ACRE PRELIMINARY 51TE LAYOUT x� EM PARCELS #I * #5 5CALE: I • = 100'-0" Cscl Sand Companies, Inc fmm.Ol....I..mT.Y.4�•Peeb.. W 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Boz 727 Wove Park MNS6387-0727 OJfwe.- (320) 201-3100 F= (320)101-3139 Website: N .SandCompanimcom E -Maio SCICa SandCompanimcom CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE SOLE PROPERtt OF SAND COMPANIES. W. ANY REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THESE � 5 FORBIDDEN OUT MFTTEN PEAWSuON FROM SAND COMPANEm. INC. PHOJECTNO_ OI:bD O MW.. JAvcvO CHECNEO BY: R H00ONGS DATE REVLSFD DATE SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.1 PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PARCELS #3 * #4 5CALE: 111= loo--o- NOTE: 5ETBACK5 50-0' @ HWY#2124#101 3d-0' ELSEWHERE " 69 - APARTMENT HOME5 5.98 ACRE5 - PARCEL #4 1 1 .54 UN IT5 If ACRE \ " A . " �O A2 / I " I " WET LAND / If If I ---------------------- X'A 3 5TORY BUILDING OVER PARKING GARAGE, LYMAN BOULEVARD POND#I I\ I\ 5TORE CAR WASH SERVICE OFFICE 1 ONE 5TOKY I L4 , °� I li �:*SCI Sand Companies, Inc. C•Pnpeep Mm.gmievt.MNepmm� e. 336 South Tenth Avenge POE" 717 Wait Park MeV 56387-0727 Office.- (320)102-3100 Far (320) 202-3139 Webshw w-SandCompaniescom E -Mai. SCI@9"dCompomes.com ..-1TY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 .AANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESE DRAWINGS AID SPECIFIC TONSARET4c SOLE PROPERTY OF S COMPANIES, INC ANY REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF TAESE DOCUMEUTS IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FRDIA SANG COMPANIES. WE PROJECT No- 4-3 DRAWN IW. .WV.CW CHECKED BY: F, HERRINGS DATE REVISED DATE. SAN D COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.2 PARCELS 5ETDACK5 50-1 @ HWY #212 # # 101 30'-O° EL5EWHERE APARTMENT HOME5 TOWNHOME5 4.91 ACRES - PARCEL#1 1.2 ACRES - PARCEL #5 G. I I ACRE5 = 1 1 .95 UN1T5 / ACRE PRELIMINARY 51TE LAYOUT PARCELS #I * #5 5CALE: 1R= 100-08 VSCI Sand Companies, Inc. C-1--. lc�..Pm.o, 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Wade Park AIN 5 638 7-072 7 Office: (320)101-3100 Far (320) 202-3139 Websirc w .SaadCompaniescom EMmZ SCIa(�Wa dCompan com CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTOF SAND COMPANIES. INC ANY REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THESE DOCUMEMS IS FORMODEN WRHOIR WRT. EN PERMISSION IF.. SAND COMPANIES. INC PROACT NO.: W.ILO DRAWN BY: JAWCCOD CHECKED WC ft HENNINGS REV SED DATE SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.1 Q NORTH PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PARCELS #3 � #4 SCALE: I"= 100'-0" NOTE: 5ETBACK5 50'-0' @ tiWY #2 1 2 E # 101 / 30'-0' EL5EWHERE / 69 - APARTMENT HOME5 5.98 ACRE5 - PARCEL #4 1 1 .54 UNITS / ACRE / \ / �0 I� / / I / WET LAND i I LYMAN BOULEVARD 0-4 ❖►SCI Sand Companies, Inc. fouSourapvly Mvv v.prvrlvpmmt 336 th Temh Avenue PO BOY 727 Waite Pa k, MA' 5638 7-6 72 7 Office: (320) 202-3100 F= (320) 202-3139 Website: w .SandCampanies.com E -Mail: SCICXS"Wompami com CITY OF RECEIVED SSEN DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRE THE SOLE FNOPERTV OF S COMPANIES, INC ANY REFROWCTION OR REUSE OF TI£SE COCDNE IS FORBIOOEN MIR .IN YaUTTEiI PERN!$SpN FROM ,,N, COMPNJIFS. M, . PROJECTNO.: 043W CRAM By JAvnm CHECI W R HENNINGS DATE REVISED WT£' SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.2 a . . . . . . . . . . . . P A N ON NMI 71MEN. Omljvm m; :m' 7�-- 11SIMIN IN 010 NMI merg NMI ON JIME ON :41111H111111111111r. NMI ff7ll;vullllllllllil"- IF'- 3 B25p., 302 `A rt. 3 YORGLM 3 9E�RUVM I<5950.R I ttpROGN 382`A1 2PlCpXM ' 2EfORLLM ' 20�19(Y au so.n. a3. San. io3+sa� r5 I z amcow z ama�ou 03. soFr. �03� son. � / 23AG?A.:i. MARWY. 9 iKO B®Pp'M 5 - le4C P9 NN 16 - l0lr4 T IIOCP e -Toru QFIRST FLOOR PLAN (2ND 8 3RD FLOOR PIAN 51M.) �J SCALE: U 16' = 11-a iscl Sand Compania, Inc .U{S TM Arent Ma r7 WyeM MNM .74W Off. p21/202 lff Fu: (J20)21"10 Wlhie: awn iW('anpwina'en E-0/dl:.K'X SUIC'wpuinrnn ITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 0 6 2005 'ASSEN PLANNING DEPT CHANHASSEN GATEWAY HOUSING PHASEI CHANHASSEN,MN FLOOR PLAN A-1.0 05-01 Planning Commission Mee — January 4, 2005 Lillehaug: We know what this is going to generate. I mean there's 54 residences there. It's going to generate between 10-14 trips per day so we're looking at 600 to 700 trips a day from this development, either going north or south so split down the middle. You're looking at 350 going north and 350 south. I mean it's a reasonable number on a local street in my opinion. And so I don't think, in my opinion, I don't want to give staff direction to do that because in my opinion it's reasonable on the local street. On Gunflint Trail to the south as well as flighover to the north. I think the traffic levels that would be distributed on those streets are still going to be within the local 750 to 1,000 maximum. I know that's high but that's city, what's in the city comprehensive plan. Slagle: Well you're within your rights to reject the friendly amendment. Lillehaug: And I reject it. Slagle: Fair enough. So we have a motion on the floor to table this with direction to staff to re- work, if at all possible, the northeast quadrant. Invite the Park and Rec Director to speak to us at our next meeting. Anything else I'm missing? Okay. Lillehaug moved, Papke seconded that the Planning Commission table the rezoning and subdivision request for Yoberry Farms with direction to staff to re -work the northeast quadrant and to invite the Park and Rec Director to speak or provide written comment regarding the Park and Recreation Commission recommendation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Slagle: We're going to take a 5 minute break. Chuck Alcon: Question. Tabled until? Slagle: Well. Aanenson: We can tum it around. Slagle; Sounds good. Thank you. CASE No. 05-01. Public Present: Name Address Jamie Thelen 366 South 10`s Avenue, Waite Park, MN 37 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Jun Sand 366 South 10th Avenue, Waite Park, MN Al Klingelhutz 8600 Great Plains Boulevard Richard A. Hennings 366 South 10th Avenue, Waite Park, MN Christopher Hol 8687 Chanhassen Hills Drive North Keith Collins 7420 Coventry Way, Edina Patty & Craig Mullen 611 Summerfield Drive April Halbe 9151 Great Plains Boulevard Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. Lillehaug: ...and then can you comment on the very northerly parcel, parcel number 5. I think I missed it. Why is that odd shaped right-of-way skewing down? What's the deal with that? Aanenson: Yeah. That's Qwest has a building there. Qwest, a switch station. Lillehaug: So the City's going to maintain permanent right-of-way over that whole entire area? Aanenson: That's not our's. It was sold to Qwest so yeah. See you've got this whole triangle piece here. What it does is. Lillehaug: Can you show that in outline, just to make sure we're talking about the same thing. Aanenson: Can you zoom in? You're talking about this piece right here. Lillehaug: Right. I mean it's approximately 60 feet plus or minus wide for you know that entire stretch and is that, so you're saying that's not going to be city right-of-way? Aanenson: There will be right-of-way in front of it, but what I'm saying is that, if you look at this is a picture superimposed over. There's a restricted median right here. So you can come in right but how do you get out? There's a median. Lillehaug: I don't think we're on the same page. Looking at this, it's this whole area right here. Aanenson: Yeah, I don't... Saam: It's not right-of-way Steve. I think you think it's right-of-way. It's not right-of-way. Lillehaug: That's the question. Okay, thank you. Sacchet: Any other questions of staff? No? With that I'd like to invite the applicant to come forward to give us your presentation. The short version if I may ask for it. Jim Sand: Agreed. Thank you Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, city staff. My name is Jim Sand and I'm the Vice President of Sand Companies. Vice President of Development and I have with us tonight part of our team. Our senior architect, Richard Hennings is here with us and our company President Jamie Thelen. And I don't have a lot to add to Kate's comments 38 03KKA'.N Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 other than we did hold a neighborhood meeting on December 16a'. We had approximately 30 neighbors and one of the commission members attend. We had a lot of good feedback. A lot of good questions and felt that it was a real good chance to meet our neighbors. With that I'll turn it over to Richard who has larger renditions of what we're proposing and go through that. Sacchet: Thank you. Richard Hennings: I think in the interest of time I would just cover, I think Kate did an admirable job of explaining our project to us so I'll just cover a few of the things that I think are pertinent. The issue of the. Sacchet: Excuse me. Do you mind directing the microphone towards you a little bit? Richard Hennings: Close enough? Sacchet: Yeah, thank you. Richard Hennings: Speaking to the issue of the median on Lake Susan Drive, and you may have more current information than I did. When we first started the project we were told that that meeting was going to be there. I contacted, and I don't remember the name but I contacted the engineer and he told me at that time, he thought 115 feet, and so he was encouraging me to say it's okay to put driveways off. I understand though on the other hand you had a conversation as recently as yesterday so. Aanenson: No. All plans, just to be clear, as in the previous one, all plans go to affected jurisdictions so obviously this plan went up to MnDot. We met with Jon Chiglo who is in charge of this whole project for 212 and he was aware that they're trying to draft or look at how we solve the problem because he's aware of the conflict so. Richard Hennings: I think the other thing I just want to bring up, we had talked earlier about the roadway through the southern parcel and right now the drawing that we had prepared is, I'm not a traffic engineer but I try to reflect what I thought would be kind of a traffic calming road here and so I portrayed the road as not terribly wide and with intentional fairly sharp corners. As ways of slowing the traffic and not encouraging it as a cut through. So kind of a fine line between a convenient to get here but not so convenient that it's a better way than going through the intersection at Lyman and I guess that's the direction we would give to civil engineers when we're talking to them and see if they can translate that into real engineering, but so right now it is intentionally drawn with 90 degree comers that would have a fairly tight radius I guess I'd describe it, so that that's one of the points you'd have to slow down, and that the roadway would not be very wide and so that we wouldn't have passing lanes and all those kinds of things. And the one other piece of information I thought we should share. The local watershed district is developing a wide area, an area wide project for purposes of water clarity on Lake Riley and some other things. And they have contacted us in regard to utilizing part of the wetland here as part of that project and what they're suggesting that they may excavate part of that wetland and create more open water as a holding pond, a fairly deep holding pond so they get quality control. That's what they're looking for. Not quantity control but quality control, and we would cooperate with them in that our other ponds would have to do with quantity control and their's 39 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 would do with quality control so I would think as our project moves along we'll probably see some more information on that develop there. And then the last thing about affordable housing. Sand Companies is an active developer of tax credit housing. We have done a dozen projects over the last 8-10 years. Currently we'll have one more townhouse project in St. Joseph, Minnesota that will be constructed this year, so we are interested in that. Obviously you know it's a competitive process and just because we can all say we're interested doesn't mean that the Minnesota Housing Finance Corporation will see fit to do that. But it would be of interest to us to explore using tax credit financing for one of the buildings on the north side, and particularly the apartment building. So while we have designated a 3 story apartment building, we have to admit that we don't have a clear market for that. We have also given consideration to developing a senior cooperative on that site the same way because we think that's an interesting market here, so the usage we really haven't clarified there yet but I think you can safely assume that we will explore the tax credit housing automatically and to the extent that it is possible so. With that I guess I would just tum it over to see if there are any other questions. Sacchet: Excellent. Any questions from the applicant? No? Thank you very much. Appreciate it. With that, this is a public hearing. I'd like to open this for comments from anybody here who'd like to address this item. Please come forward at this time, if you want to address this item. And state your name and address for the record please. Let us know what you have to say. Patty Mullen: My name is Patty Mullen. I live at 611 Summerfield Drive. I'd like to start by saying unfortunately I wasn't able to make the neighborhood meetings and I wonder if there's another opportunity to get a little more input before I maybe start addressing concerns that might not be. And my biggest concerns would be that the development stay consistent with the things that are already developed in the area so as not to jeopardize the integrity of those. And I need a better understanding of buffering. Aanenson: We can certainly facilitate a meeting where we can come in and go through that specifically what the PUD buffering is and all that. We'd be happy to do that. Patty Mullen: Okay, thank you. Sacchet: Thank you very much. Are there any other residents? Yes, if you want to please come forward and state your name and address and what you have to share with us. Chris Hol: My name's Chris Hol. I live at 8687 Chanhassen Hills Drive North so I'm on the very north end of this project. Now my concern is fust of all apartment buildings. I mean you know if it's a two level building, that's fine. But I think 3, you know we moved out this way for the beauty of it and now I don't want to be looking out my back window at apartment buildings. Thankfully I'm not as affected as some of my neighbors are, but the other concern I would say is now, 101, is that going to be cul-de-saced? Saam: Yeah. Chris Hol: So that will be down there. There won't be anyway to cut through? 0 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Aanenson: Yeah, at the end of this, the old 101 will be cul-de-saced... also towards the end where the creek is. Chris Hol: Right. Okay. Aanenson: It would not be for cut through traffic either. Chris Hol: Yeah, because the only other thing I would, my concern is, and I know it's been brought up is the Lake Susan Drive. You know people that don't want to come all the way up here are now going to maybe cut through and it's going to cause a lot more traffic for us. Aanenson: Yeah, that was one of the things we talked about with the traffic study. Chris Hol: Good, okay. That's all I want to say. Thank you. Sacchet: Anybody else want to address this item? Yes, Al. Please A] Klingelhutz: Chairman, Planning Commission members. I'm A] Klingelhutz and in 8600 Great Plains Boulevard and most of the land we're talking about here tonight was land that I farmed for 60 some years. Was in my family since 1862 and I guess the one concern I have is this piece here. Aanenson: It's a connection, as I mentioned before. This is Mr. Klingelhutz' property. The original farmstead. Is how do you get access to these pieces. Al Klingelhutz: Through this property right here. And the median on Lake Susan Drive which we talked about. Kind of eliminates pretty much of the access to this 7 or 8 acre piece here. And I have a concern about that. And Kate and I have, and my two sons who plan on developing this property. It's going to be a family development. It's been a family farm. It's going to be a family development. Neal has been in construction for many years now. Our house on Lake Susan was the first house he built on his own. Before that he was working for some other developers. But that was the first house he built on his own and he's been building homes ever since that time and that's 21-22 years ago that he built our house. So anyway, I'm just saying this so you don't have to wont' that he's. Sacchet: He knows what he's doing. Al Klingelhutz: He knows what he's doing, let's put it that way. But I do feel that there should be an access to this property somewhere on Lake Susan Drive. It could be up on this end. I know they don't want to go any closer than 600 feet from a major intersection so it'd have to be up here quite a ways, and I think there wouldn't be any problem with that ... family development because they would like to have access to that same Lake Susan Drive at some point because they're going to have a small development on the north side of that, on Lake Susan Drive. That's what I was complaining about ... we've known this is going to happen for a long time. As the zoning's been there for this property and for the rest of my property plus the piece on the east side of the road. It's been pretty well publicized that some of these things are going to actually 41 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 happen in this area. So that is my, our main concern is the fact that we sure would like an access to Lake Susan Drive. Sacchet: Thank you. A] Klingelhutz: That isn't to say we're going to go out through Chan Hills but we thought this way we could get onto 101, in and out. Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you very much. Slagle: Quick question if I may to staff. A] Klingelhutz: Any questions? Sacchet: For staff. Slagle; I'm just curious is, Kate why wouldn't we, to Mr. Klingelhutz' property, access it off the cul-de-sac to 101? Aanenson: We could come off this way, but you know again when you're putting additional trips on the backs of these homes, it'd be nice if we didn't have to do that. Because then you could actually build a buffer along here. If you follow what I'm saying there. That'd be the best. But that may not happen. You know certainly, when this is a private development, a PUD. A private street. Typically we don't connect two specific, so you know, can we force it to be a public street, so we're really trying to work with both properties together to make it work the best for the layout, but again then you're just forcing more trips around. Could it happen that way? Yeah, but. Slagle: Do you have a preference Mr. Klingelhutz? Al Klingelhutz: Do we have apartments? Slagle: No a preference as to, could you access? Al Klingelhutz: I would prefer if we could get right onto Lake Susan Drive and circle up to Lake Susan Drive here and then come out to get over to the new 101. Slagle: Alright. Sacchet: And that's somewhat in line with what you presented in the beginning, isn't it? Aanenson: Yep. That's what we're working on. Sacchet: Okay. A] Klingelhutz: Keep that in mind because it really is a big preference. 42 M Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • Sacchet: And it looks like staff is already pursuing that from their angle as well. Thank you. Anybody else wants to speak up to this item. Seeing nobody, I'm going to close the public hearing. Bring it back to the commission for comments, discussion. Want to start this item? Lillehaug: Sure. I'll rattle mine off. It's a concept PUD. I do want to make a note that in the developer's letter to us they indicate heights of buildings and some of the parameters that at this point I don't plan on reviewing and I expect them not to hold us to those elevations. Work with staff on developing the PUD to make sure it fits. So I just want to make sure that you have those parameters in there but we shouldn't be adhering to them at this point. Number one comment, and this is my major comment is, the two north parcels there and the Lake Susan Hills Drive. I've expressed my concerns previously regarding the cut through traffic and I know staffs aware of that but we really need to get a handle on. Not the traffic that's being generated from these two north parcels but the potential for all the cut through traffic that can go through on Lake Susan Drive because I see that as a very large potential, and if I live on Lake Susan Hills Drive, it's a very direct connect without having to go through the numerous signals and I would use that, so it's, I have great concerns there so we really need to take a look at doing something there and making sure that we're not introducing cut through traffic so extreme that everyone of them residents are going to be very upset with what happened here. The parcel 5 to the north, somehow you know it split off from the parcel across from Lake Susan Drive to the south. It really needs to be worked in with something to the north, and I'm assuming that they have similar zoning or guidances. Okay, good. Berming. We talked, staff talks about landscaping and screening but I want to make sure that we're including berming in addition to landscaping as screening. Traffic study, reiterate that. Be very clear that I would like to see a traffic study for the Lake Susan Drive connection as well the other road through the southerly site. And then definitely it needs, this site needs to work with the developer on the Klingelhutz property and access to the property to the north there and I think I have all my comments. Sacchet: Good comments. Thanks Steve. Dan, anything to add? Keefe: My only comment would be, at least from where I sit, it seems like the developer's really doing a nice job of kind of engaging with the city and everybody else and I commend them on that and that's it. Sacchet: Thank you. Kurt. Papke: Nothing to add. Sacchet: Rich. Yeah, I think everybody's expressed very clearly. I mean it looks like, it's very encouraging that the direction that staff is exploring matches what the concern is from the Klingelhutz property to the north. To line up that access and I support it. I think we're on a good track with it. With that I'd like to have a motion. Papke: I'll make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends, approves the concept PUD with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. 43 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: We have a motion. Is there a second? Lillehaug: Second. Sacchet. Are there any friendly amendments? Lillehaug: The amendments as I indicated in my comments. Sacchet: Okay. Is that acceptable? Papke: Acceptable. 0 Papke moved, Lillehaug seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01, Sand Companies, Inc., with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report and Commissioner Lillehaug's comments. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Sacchet: Now it is 10:00 at night. I do want to just pose the question to the commissioners. We will go beyond curfew but I think we can get through them all. Are you willing to stay beyond curfew a little bit tonight? Alright. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW FOR FIVE LOT SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES ON 3.36 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSF), LOCATED AT THE END OF CRESTVIEW DRIVE. (SHIVLEY ADDITION). CRESTVIEW. APPLICANT LECY BROS HOMES, PLANNING CASE NO. 05-02. Public Present: Name Address Pam Johnson Paul & Rachelle Tungseth Andrew Johnsmd Alan Nikolai Dick Herrboldt Tim Larkin Peter Knibble 2050 Crestview Drive 2051 Crestview Drive Lecy Bros Homes 6282 Cartway Lane, Excelsior 6464 Murray Hill Road Terra Engineering Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Sacchet: Thank you Bob. Rich, questions? Slagle: I just have two. Bob, you refer to the, and if we can put the plat up of the, and then the southern connection. Yeah, there we go. So I am to assume that in hearing you the City Council 44 h:. r.: January 28, 2005 ♦e • SSI Sand Companies, Inc. Minnesota Department of Transportation 366 South Tenth Avenue Metropolitan District PO Box 727Waite Park, MN 56387-0727 Waters Edge Office: (320) 202-3100 1500 West County Road B-2 Fax: (320) 202-3139 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 E -man: SCI@SandCompanies.com Website: www.SandCompanies.com Re: Sand Companies Concept Planned Unit Development Mn/DOT Review SO -104 Northwest Comer of Re -aligned TH 101 and Lyman Boulevard Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 109 Attn: Mary E. Jackson, Intermediate Planner Dear Ms. Jackson; We write in response to your review letter of January 10, 2005. While the Chanhassen City Council approved our concept plan subject to numerous conditions on January 24, 2005, we expect development of the various parcels to occur beginning in 2006 or later, so detailed planning for streets etc. is some time into the future. You note in your first bullet point that you need geometric plans and dimensions in order to review the project in full. It would seem logical that we obtain engineering plans of the highway work when they become available during 2005 and allow our civil engineering consultant to develop our detailed plans to match alignments etc. We will contact Lynn Clarkowski, Area Engineer, when the timing seems appropriate. Bullet point #2 notes driveways off Lake Susan Drive will have to be 660 feet from TH 101. This is a major problem since our property extends only about 620 feet along Lake Susan Drive. The 660 -foot rule would effectively isolate the property and allow no access from any direction. We hope this can be discussed and a mutual agreement made allowing access considerably closer to TH101. We have developed early Schematic - — —Plansshowing oiour east property line. Early discussions with the City of Chanhassen are looking to establish a new street intersection at this same location to run northwesterly along the east side of the existing communications building property. This would have Great Plains Boulevard meet Lake Susan Drive at that intersection, and remove traffic from behind several homes in the Lake Susan neighborhood, a goal of the city. The second part of bullet #2 speaks to the street connection between TH101 to Lyman Boulevard which is shown on our drawings. You note the requirement for right turn and left turn lanes on our new street at TH 101 and we can agree that is a good idea. Your letter further notes that TH 101 must have right and left tum lanes for this intersection. We presume you state this as information to us since we do not have control over TH 101 design. We will plan to align our new street with your intersection once the detailed information is available. You bullet point #3 references the requirement that drainage rates to the right of way be 31W- Const. & Dev. Dw\Cha^h� land Der lopmeot #04-3001AmhiteM=m Si RelatedU DT012705.dm Construction ♦ Property Management ♦ Development Equal Opportunity Employer maintained and that permits be secured at the appropriate times. We understand these requirements and will direct our civil engineering consultant to comply. Similarly we will submit plans to and comply with requirements of Carver County in regard to the Lyman Boulevard connection. Sincerely, lard A. Hennings, AIA SeniorArchitect C: V//Kate Aanenson, Community Developmen Director, Chanhassen Paul Oehme, PE, City Engineer, Chanhassen Jim Sand, Sand Companies Inc PASO - Cons[ & Dev. DMChanhassen Land Development #04-300Vudhitectu e�Srte ReletedV InDOnI2705.doc \ I X/ t / .� I\ \ 4T oM �° X/ J I I. o ry w X I _ HOMESRTMENT 3 O 3 STORY _ OI I — BUILDING KI y, OVERPARKING , �I t I L_�.I L Owu I iQNN i g I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I u l IEl J I I1 I I Tm_ \\\\ L I To«Nn \\ I I \ I \ NORTH NOTE: 5ETBACK5 50'-O" @ HWY #212 b# 10 I +--� UJ+'I-- -- jf--- ----�fn 30'-O"EL5EWHERE � i4n v 51 - APARTMENT HOME5 W / POND tt�t V 22 - TOWNHOME5 - /- VV 73 - TOTAL LIVING UNIT5 4.91 ACRES - PARCEL # I 4 I 1.2 ACRE5 - PARCEL#5 z �/ _ G. I I ACRE5 = 1 1.95 UNIT5 / ACRE 0I ,/rx I PRELIMINARY 51TE LAYOUT +� ESO M x PARCELS #I * #5 5CALE: i N = 100'-0" ❖SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Bos 727 Waite Park MN56387-0727 Office: (310)101-3100 F= (320) 201-3139 Website: w SandCompaniescom E -Mail SCia(,TandCompaniescam CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT . TNESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIE GnONS ME THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SM0 COMPANIES, INC. ANY REPRODUCTONORREDSEOFTHESECOCINE M SAND 0En MaES. NTtITIEN PfRM15510N FROM SAND COMPANIES, mC. PfR),IECF NO_ D13W gUMN R1` JAVF CHECKED BY: FLHENNINGS DATE REVISEO MTE SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.1 QD NORTH PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PARCELS #3* #4 SCALE: I„ = 100 -al NOTE: 5ET13ACY5 50'-0' @ HWY #212 B # 101 30-O' ELSEWHERE i G9 - APARTMENT HOMES 5.95 ACRE5 - PARCEL #4 �� F I 1.54 UNITS /ACRE � �° / WET LAND I -"IJ 3 STORY BUILDING OVER PARKING GARAGE, LYMAN BOULEVARD , , , , , RETAIL / \ 5FRVICE:. OFF1C- l\ \ SOTORY \ PDN D#1 5TORE CAR V/A5H I I C YY 8 I I + I I I I I I III III I `5ERVICE OFFICE ONE STORY � I I C U u z ►1 ****SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 336 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Pack MA' 56397-0727 Ofce. (320)102-3100 Fax. (320)101-3139 Website: w .SandCompzuta com E -Mail. SCI@SandCompa descom CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 'HANHASSEN PLANNING DW THESE DMWINW "0 SPEC6%AT1JN6 PTF TE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAND COMPANIES, INC. ANT REPROOU2I OR REUSE OF THESE DDDJR S IS FORBIOOEN WR{U' - WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SS.,, CgMPAMES. MC. PROJECT NO.: DFSW DRAWN SY: .MVILOO CRECI EO BY: R. HEMIN DATE _- REVISEDDATE: '-- SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.2 PARCEL YS / �\ \ Ar zX/ WI \ z J 1 z ozx ZI HOMEARTMENrS3 1 p 35rORY01 ' BUILDING - I OVER W1 � ' v GARAGE D } L all = I � � I � TOY OM I I TW%IOri. I 7 I 1 I I � I I I i I g I I I �m roumnoMEs ` / +�+ I ` rwmnoM \\ \ NORTH Fri j NOTE: 5ETBACK5 ' VV 50'-0'@HWY#212 C#101 +--i- -- -------- ----�� 39-0'EL5EWHERE z n n POND ' # v\ ` 51 - APARTMENT HOME5 3 I ' 22 - TOWNHOMES O 1 /G��P` 73 - TOTAL LIVING UNIT5 o - n% w / 4.91 ACRE5 - PARCEL # I i I > I 1.2 ACRES - PARCEL#5 z I �/ G.11 ACRES= 11.95-UNIT5/ACRE o��x I PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT 65i x� M PARCELS #I * #5 5CALE: I" = Too --o-1 As'CI Sand Companies, Inc. ce.o...aw.. r.,r=m M..•r....�.R..sr.�n 336 South Te"h Avenge POB" 727 Wmfe Pak MN 5638 7-072 7 Office: (320) 202-3100 F= (320) 202-3139 Websic w .SandCompaniescom E -Mail: SCI@SandCompaaiescom CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFKATDNSARE rHE S PROPERTY OF SVD OOMPANIES, INC. ANY RFPROOUCTION OR REUSE OF TNESE � 6 FORFR C WRHOUTNRR PERMISSION FROM SAND CO WES. N FROJEC MO; a -3N ORAWN W. JAVXW CHEO n RHENNIN mm --- REVISEDOAM ... SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.1 Q NORTH PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PARCELS #3* #4 5CALE: I = 100'-0" NOTE: 5ETBACK5 50'-0° @ h WY #212 # # 101 30-O' EL5EWhfKt i G9 - APARTMENT hOME5 5.98 ACRES - PARCEL #4 / \ I 1.54 UNITS /ACRE � �O / I 2 � WET LAND I OVER PARKING GARAGE ---------------- I Z LYMAN BOULEVARD ONE STORY r.lifirrll OEEICE ONE STORY --T{------+ ?ON D 61 STORE CAR WA5H I I I - I I SERVICE OEEICE ONE STORY 0 so 1 •:��' 1 Sand Companies, Inc. 336 SNNth Tenth Avenue PO Boz 717 Wa&e Park M4' 5638 7-072 7 Office: (310)102-3100 F.. (310) 202-3139 Website: w SandCompanimcom F -Mail: SClCWSandCompanies.com CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNIN(iDEPT i ESE D WINGB NID SPECNM'ATNNLS TFE SIX£HtO W OF WID CONPFNIFS, INC NM NEPROWI:IION OR flEUSE OF TIESEBOCUNEni515 COM FOR81WRIgU!WRRTB!PEfMI.SSYJN FRW SRND CONPPNIES. INC. P ECT NO D: 043N WN BY: .V�WLOO C CFFD BY: RMFlNINGS GAT REVISER RAM --- SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN • 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 317 Payee: SAND PROPERTIES INC Date: 10/07/2004 Time: 10:23am Receipt Number: DW / 5487 Clerk: DANIELLE GIS LIST 04-38 SAND ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- GIS GIS LIST 04-38 SAND GIS LIST 243.00 --------------- Total: 243.00 Check 12061 243.00 --------------- Change: 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! $CAN"Eo CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 O'5 -C I CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT APPLICANT: Sand Companies, Inc. OWNER: Sand Companies, Inc. ADDRESS: 366 S 10th Ave Waite Park MN 56387 TELEPHONE (Day Time) 320-202-3100 ADDRESS: 366 S 10th Ave Waite Park MN 56387 TELEPHONE: 320-202-3100 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non -conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit ✓ Planned Unit Development' Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review ✓ Notification Sign Site Plan Review` X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost" - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB Subdivision' TOTAL FEE $ 925.00 Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box ❑ In possesion Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. `Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. "Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: Sand Companies Development, Chanhassen MN LOCATION: Northwest & Southwest comers of intersection of Hiehwav 212 & 101 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached ALTA Survey for parcel descriptions. TOTAL ACREAGE: 21.77 WETLANDS PRESENT: ✓ YES NO PRESENTZONING: RSF REQUESTED ZONING: PUD PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Mixed use REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Mixed use REASON FOR REQUEST: To allow development of the various sites in conformance with the guided uses. This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am maldng application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or 1 am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. LLai�— a•dz10V Si a e of Applicant Date of Fee Owner Application Received on �4 Ja O 4 Date Fee Paid 9�� Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: SAND PROPERTIES INC Date: 12/02/2004 Time: 12:26pm Receipt Number: DW / 5686 Clerk: DANIELLE CONCEPT PUD 05-01 ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- DEVAP CONCEPT PUD 05-01 USE & VARIANCE 750.00 SIGN RENT 75.00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 --------------- Total: 925.00 Check 12096 925.00 --------------- Change: 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! {CANNED City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 MI OF (952) 227-1100 To: Jim W. Sand Vice President of Development Sand Companies, Inc 366 South 10th Avenue, PO Box 727 Waite Park, MN 56387-0727 Ship To: 0 Invoice SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM 9/23/04 upon receipt ,INIII 81IProperty Owners List within 500' of Sand Property -Highway 101 & Lyman Blvd. (80 labels) TOTALDUE Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: SAND GIS. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! $3.00 i $243.00 $243.00 SCANNED 0 E AMY J SCHE ETAL KEITH E & LISA L SCHWEGLER MARK & KRISTINA SCHWENDINGER 8990QUINN RD RD 619 SUMMERFIELD DR 8708 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N PO BOX 6 68 8 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DONALD T SINNIGER & MICHELE M ABEL 600 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES JONATHON SOMMERS & KAREN D ROGGE 8683 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SPRINGFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSN 7100 MADISON AVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 LESLIE E TIDSTROM 8679 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 UTPAL R VAIDYA & LEENA UTPAL VAIDYA 861 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID M SMITH & PATRICE N LUNDGREN-SMITH 8568 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & JODI L SOTEBEER 8565 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL MN 55155 ABBA J TREGOBOV & SUSANA P MACHADO-TREGOBOV 8714 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN H & RUTH M VANCE 8588 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JUDSON E & JILL C SNELL 8694 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CURTIS A & SUSAN M SPERLING 8525 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRUCE A & SHEILA M TANQUIST 8569 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP INC ATTN: TAX DEPT M/S 624 PO BOX 7028 BEDMINSTER NJ 07921 BRYAN J & LISA C VAN NINGEN 8686 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMI D WALKER CORY M & PAMELA S WATKINS FRANK T & MARY LOU WHALEY 8517 CHANHASSEN HLLS DR S 595 SUMMERFIELD DR 851 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER T & AIMEE J ADAMS RICHARD C & SUSAN M AMBERSON 8690 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8549 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT F & KAREN L ANDERSON GREGG A & MICHELLE D ALINE 8561 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8705 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG R & GERALDINE BARETTE R STEVEN & MAURA BARNETT 8695 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8709 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TERRY LEE & MARI T BERANAK JOSHUA E & CORA L CONKLIN 8576 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8990 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EDWARD S & NANCY J COUGHLIN JAMES A CURRY 587 SUMMERFIELD DR 6105 EDEN PRAIRIE RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 #17 EDINA MN 55436 PATRICK A & LAURENE FARRELL JASON J GILBERTSON & 801 LYMAN BLVD KATJA JEANNERET CHANHASSEN MN 55317 583 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS P HAGMAN & HUSSAM HASSOUN SUSAN M R I 8537 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 5553317 625 SUMMERFIELD D CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DANIEL M & MELISSA L HERZOG CHRISTOPHER & DEBORA K HOL 8790 LAKE SUSAN CT 8687 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RONALD G & JOYCE L HORR BRIAN W & KRISTIN A HOULE 8513 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 880 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICIA JOHNSON SHANNON G & MICHELLE A KERN 8715 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 607 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 MICHAEL B & CATHERINE ANDERSON 8709 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RUSSELL G BAHENSKY 8552 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WILLIAM E BENSON 8596 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ALAN COSENTINO & SHERRI BEIER 8572 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NORMAN & JACQUELINE ENGEL 8699 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG D GUTSCHOW & BARBARA J CLAYTON 8691 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGORY J & SUSAN L HENKEL 8699 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TROY & JENNIFER HOLASEK 8556 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BENJAMIN R K & DONNA M JOHNSON 8521 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LAWRENCE C & ELIZABETH KLEIN 9170 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 AL & M J,KLINGELHUTZ TRUST S & TRACY L KURVERS C/O ALOYSIUS & M J KLINGELHUTZ MARK CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 8560 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANTHONY LARSON & LINDSAY NELSON 8545 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HARLAN C LEOPOLD 8553 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID S & JANICE A LUNDQUIST 8705 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL G & KAREN L MCNEIL 8695 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TIMOTHY S & TAMARA S MILLER 579 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL W & ANA E MORENO 603 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVE J & MARY A PANENO 8564 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY A & MICHELLE M REITAN 8900 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DENNIS H & RUTH L LAUFENBURGER 8673 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LONG LI & YING Z WANG 8557 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SO VAN LY & SUSAN YKUN UNG 8509 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CYNTHIA ANN MILLER 891 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK L & KIM M MISMASH 591 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CRAIG L & PATRICIA A MULLEN 611 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SEONGWOO PARK & MIN JEONG HAN 8580 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL & MELISSA ROHRMOSER 8698 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 a MARK R & STACEY G LAKOSKY 8533 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KHANH & KHIEM LE 631 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 ROBERT B MARTINOVICH & PATRICIA A MARTINOVICH 8592 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREG ALLAN MILLER 8801 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LISA K MOORE 8682 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC S & JULIE A OYEN 615 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PHOULITHAT PHANDANOUVONG & VATSANA PHANDANOUVONG 8529 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RAYMOND J ROOB JR & CHAE SUK BOOB 8584 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS A & GRETA K ROSE JEFFREY A & TANYA L SCHNEIDER PAUL C SCHNETTLER & 8541 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8702 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N KATE D WARD SCHNETTLER 599 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 REQUEST FOR CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: NORTHWEST CORNER OF _LYMAN BOULEVARD AND THE FUTURE REALIGNED HIGHWAY 101, SAND COMPAIES. INC., PLANNING CASE NO. 05-01. Public Present: Name Address Jamie Thelen 366 South Tenth Avenue, Waite Park, MN Jim Sand 366 South Tenth Avenue, Waite Park, MN Richard Hennings 366 South Tenth Avenue, Waite Park, MN Kate Aanenson: Thank you. The Sand Company is requesting rezoning of approximately 24 acres. The subject site is, this is the new 212 interchange. This would be Lyman. Excuse me, Lyman and the new 101. This is existing 101. Again 24 acres. Obviously this site is tied into the relocation and the redevelopment of the 212. There's existing wetlands in the easterly corner and 101 will have to be vacated at this point here. As worded in your packet, kind of an overview. We're tying this PUD, as you recall last year we worked on the Southwest Transit PUD and I included in your packet. This is a concept and again the concept, state law says that the zoning and the land use designation need to be consistent. This is guided as a mixed use. These are the only two areas in town that we have that mixed use which could be neighborhood business or high density. Multi -family. The applicant has chosen to come in with the mixed so while it is guided residential single, excuse me. Zoned residential single family it is guided for the mixed use, and that's what the applicant has chosen to do. Again they're coming forward with the PUD concept. The concept again, while it has no legal standing, the intent is to give some clear direction so you notice the staff report kind of has a lot of bullet points. It's really to flush out the issues as this evolves because as I'll explain to you in a minute, we're negotiating still with MnDot and the watershed district on some issues. But with the PUD, the nice thing about that is we'll get the design standards in place, so everybody understands that. The PUD also has a little bit more stringent buffer requirements. There is kind of a built in buffer with 212 but will also has additional buffering when we have a transition between a higher density land use and a lower density. Also with a PUD, we're working with the neighboring properties which is sensitive to the residential where we've got the low scale office building on the corner, and providing those commercial sites. I'll go through their specific proposal. You have this in black and white in your site plan so it's a little bit, I think a little bit easier to read on this. Again this is the Southwest Metro park and ride and the, some office retail with multi -family on the comer. So this is the subject site. When we looked at the approval of the 212, there was a requirement that this side of the property, a through street had to be connected. There will be signalization at this intersection so this street, while it's rather circuitous on this map, you can see it on your's, that that street has to go through. That was a condition of MnDot, so they are providing that. We need to work out kind of those issues. Again as I indicated, as part of the PUD we'll be doing office on this corner, one story. I think the residents are pleased with that. Getting architectural standards, providing a good buffer. It's not our intent to put fast food in here, although there will be some other retail. Again anticipating that this location probably an appropriate site for a gas station where that's furthest removed from the residential, based on the 212 interchange. Again there will be an apartment building on this side and some strip retail on that piece. Again that piece has the biggest amount of buffer, again trying to provide Lyman, there's some residential because of the configuration of the major roads. On the north side it's all residential. This west piece of the original 24 acres. The sticky part gets in where we talk about Lake Lucy Drive. While this photo is overlaid on top of, there's a median that runs through this so the access to that is a little bit tougher. We're working, the City Engineer, Paul Oehme and myself have met with Jon Chiglo trying to work through some of those issues. How to provide good access. If you look at Mr. Klingelhutz' property, you have a private drive going through to that property. It's not the best situation there. Again this part of 101 will be vacated. I showed that on my original. Be a bean put in a place there. That provides a good transition between that and existing homes in Chan Hills. But trying to resolve what's the best access, because we don't want people going around the median. Taking U turns. Trying to work those issues out so between now and when they come back for preliminary we're pursuing those. I know when the 101 relocation and this interchange came up at the 212 hearing there was some concern about cut through traffic. Again we're trying to work through providing those transitions. There is existing traffic counts and one of the things that we're working on is trying to make it not convenient for this cut through traffic. Obviously this wouldn't be using that but as we talk about the relocation of 101, one of the things we talked about is actually moving 101 and if we can work through that. There is an existing telecommunication building right there that makes it a little bit more difficult, but maybe moving 101. That provides a berm. Some transition. Screening on the backs of those. Backing the townhouses up onto those lots, so we're still working through that. That's a little bit fluid still on that side and the applicant's aware of that. Again, the subject property could go up to 8 to 16 units an acre. As proposed on here it's only 12 units an acre. Again this is all conceptual at this point. We haven't looked at total impervious surface. Again the goal under the PUD is just kind of flush some things out as far as the uses that we're looking at. The staff feels comfortable with that. Again with the apartments, probably 3 stories in height. Again the way they're located in the site itself, the orientation I think it works best for the least amount of impact for visibility and access. So we did point out, the issues that they need to resolve, kind of department or by issue. One of the things that we are working with, the watershed district. If you saw that they put out a couple of projects to Riley -Purgatory. They were one of the projects they're going to improve Lake Riley is that ponding right there. We have a trail that runs along that side but we're going to make sure that improving that pond doesn't force us to build a big retaining wall to get that trail in so we're working with the watershed and the applicants have met with them too. To make sure that we can blend the grades on that. So the good thing about this coming forward at this time is that we can kind of all be working together as 101 and 212 advances. So with that, oh one other thing. We did mention in here too about, you're looking at the apartments. You know right now we believe that market is a little bit softer but looking at kind of where we are, some types of housing that we maybe needed because we are in close proximity to a transit facility, whether that be senior or they've looked at even some senior coop or some other type of facility that, or type of housing product that we may not have a market nitch, so with that, we're asking that the City Council approve the conceptual PUD. Again kind of with the marching orders outlined in the staff report and with that I'd be happy to answer any questions that you have. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for staff. Not at this time? Okay. Is the applicant here? If they'd like to address the council on any matter. No? Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Send the check to Kate. Mayor Furlong: Are there any questions for them? I've got one. As you look through the proposed requirements of the PUD, is there anything that you see that based upon what you're planning to do here, the types of businesses that might become issues, whether they're going to be coming back looking for changes that you can anticipate now? We seem to get a lot of those for signage and other types of needs. Is there anything that you feel uncomfortable with as this is proposed? No? Okay. Alright. Richard Hennings: I'm Richard Hennings. Architect with Sand Companies, and as Kate mentioned we're concerned about the access at Lake Susan Drive and what the highway department is potentially saying. In their written report that they sent out 10 days ago, maybe a little bit more than that, they actually talked about no access within 660 feet of the intersection. Our property's not that long and so there would be, if that was a true statement and if they thought it out, which I hope is not the case, there would be no access allowed on Lake Susan Drive to our property at all. And I guess our response to them will be, we've got to work something else here or you need to buy the property because we can't, you know you can't develop property that you don't have access to. Would have no access on any of the four sides if that were the case, so I think perhaps that that was maybe an over statement. I'm hoping that we'll get that worked out with them. That's kind of our big concern that we have right now. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Well that's an issue, and you said Kate that. Kate Aanenson: Yep. Yes, and Paul's aware of it too so we're... Mayor Furlong: We're pretty fluid there. We're working on that so. Okay. Very good. I'm sorry, Councilman Labatt. Councilman Labatt: Kate one quick question. On the, I'll call parcel probably 3. With the apartments. It's going to have the over story or over parking, the parking garage below the 3 levels. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Labatt: On the plan here it looks like there's only one entrance in and out. What's our guidelines for requiring that second entrance in or out? Kate Aanenson: We have existing apartments that have the one way in, one way out. Up on Lake Susan. Those are one way in, and actually we built the building there for the neighbors so there was a break in above grade but there's a long connected under ground. Richard Hennings: Are you talking about one way in and out of the parking lot? Councilman Labatt: The parking ramp. Mayor Furlong: If you can get towards a microphone too. Kate Aanenson: Yes. So both of those meet the current, yeah. Yep. Councilman Labatt: Okay, and then that. Kate Aanenson: This was ... one way. Councilman Labatt: The road through that property, is that a public street then? Is that what? Kate Aanenson: Yes. That was a requirement of MnDot when we approved the 212. Obviously there's some design issues. Some of the neighbors had concern about cut through traffic. Obviously if you have some of this cut through, it takes some of the pressure off this intersection which we know will have some, so that's a good thing. But we also didn't want to do it to the detriment of people trying to do business in here so that was one of the things that we've agreed that we need to kind of work through those issues where we use traffic calming. That it is, can be used to cut through but not at the detriment of the existing or proposed businesses, so. Councilman Labatt: Okay. Kate Aanenson: But these two touchdown points are fixed... Todd Gerhardt: And that's because if you have a full intersection you have to connect two state aid road sections to that. And that would be 101 and Lyman. Mayor Furlong: Kate, maybe a follow-up question with regards to signage. You mentioned a possible gas station or other types of commercial buildings in that south of 212. Even with the buffers there, what sort of visual protection will there be to the residents over in Chanhassen Hills there? I mean they're going through a lot of changes as it is. And gas station lights tend to be a little more brighter in the evening. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I think most of the commercial is going to be on this side. South of Chan Hills. I think the biggest concern we heard from was the neighbors was, they did hold a neighborhood meeting and the Planning Commission as I mentioned did recommend 5-0, but these neighbors were also concerned about. Mayor Furlong: Sure. Kate Aanenson: So you know obviously there will be some wall signs. We did talk about lighting, but they will have some monument signs. No pylons. We'll recommend the monument sign and identifying the center and once you get in, obviously the gas station is the one, which we think makes sense. With the level of activity by pushing that one up where it's bordered by 101 and new 212. Would have the least amount of light visual impact, and we did want the drive through the way we have the speaker and that's something we'll have to work with on that too. You hear the squawking. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And you know you mentioned Springfield neighborhood, and I'm glad you did because they're right down there and obviously they worked very well with the transit, Southwest Metro Transit and that park and ride and I'm glad to hear that you're meeting with the neighbors, which was evident with the lack of volume at the public hearing. At the Planning Commission and the positive so continue to do that if you would because we're, you're inbetween a couple neighborhoods here that used to look out over farm fields and they're going to see a lot of changes as I said, in the next few years. So everything we can do to mitigate the problems ahead of time would be appreciated. Thank you. Any other questions? Comments. I'll bring it back to council for discussion at this point then. Pros? Cons? Councilman Peterson: It certainly seems appropriate for surrounding Southwest Metro Transit, getting some services to that area. It doesn't have any now. From a concept standpoint I certainly think, I can't add any positive critiques to it. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Other comments? Councilwoman Tjornhom: I'm glad it's a PUD. I guess I'd have to say for one thing, I'm hoping that we'll have some quality townhouses and quality apartments that will be built that we can all be proud of. And hoping also that we can maybe have a little mixed use with potential for maybe elderly housing or other housing alternatives because it is next to the transportation hub, as you would have it in Chanhassen so I think it's a good plan. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilman Lundquist. Councilman Lundquist: Agree with the comments. The one, the only thing that really concerns me now is the townhouse, the apartment complex that would be right along Lake Susan Drive as we get into the Lake Susan Hills neighborhood. We continually hear about issues of traffic, cut through and different things going like that and to add that volume of housing right there would be, it's not a big enough concern for me now to say no but I think that will definitely be an issue going forward and the big question that I don't know the answer to is, is it better to have apartments and townhouses there or a commercial something. I don't know which drives, maybe commercial drives more traffic which could be worst but certainly something that if we haven't heard from the residents of Lake Susan Hills, I'm sure that we will so, and again I think it's a great place for these types of things to be near the Southwest and near the highway so let's just make sure that we do it right. But I think it's a good proposal. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilman Labatt. Councilman Labatt: Well I wouldn't disagree with anybody's comments here. I think, you know there's a lot of points to this potential development here that would benefit a large majority of Chanhassen. But that northern portion, we'll call it parcel 1 and 5. I think you know, they have an issue there. If MnDot's not going to give them access, off of Lake Susan Drive, so maybe we can just direct staff to strongly work with MnDot to figure something out there with MnDot to allow that to working, but with this being just conceptual, you know that gives staff the time and the energy and resources to work with the developer on it. It comes back to us for preliminary and I do like it. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. I think comments were well made. Overall I think it's a good concept. It's nice to see the variety in a mixed use development like this. The access up along Lake Susan Drive is going to be an issue as Councilman Labatt said, not just for this property owner but for the property owner to the north as well, and I know staff is aware of that. The owner there spoke at the public hearing and that issue has to be taken care of. Again, I think it's going to add some services. Some business neighborhood services to this part of town. I think as Councilwoman Tjomhom said, you know as a PUD we get a chance to really make sure it gets done right and I think that's what everybody would be looking for here so this really adds to the quality of our city which I think it has a great potential to do that and there's a lot of work to do but I'm in favor of, from a concept standpoint, of moving forward. That might mean that some things get moved around if Councilman Lundquist's comment about traffic with apartments up there is bad, then we need to do some shifting and such to make things work but ultimately it's got to work for this property owner as well as neighboring property owners as well. And I'm confident that we'll be able to get that done, so I would support it from a concept standpoint. Any other comments? If not, is there a motion? Councilman Lundquist: I'd move that the City Council approve the concept PUD with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion on the motion? Hearing none we'll proceed with the vote. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approve the concept PUD, Planning Case 05-01 with the recommendations outlined in the staff report. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1160 The applicant is requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a Fax: 952.227.1190 MEMORANDUM Engineering TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Phone: 952.227.1160 CITY Fax: 952.227.1170 OF FROM: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director CgANgASSEN Phone: 952.227.1140 Planning Commission Minutes dated January 4, 2005. Fax: 952.227.1110 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY DATE: Phone: 952.227.1125 January 12, 2005 �/o 7700 Market Boulevard (O PO Box 147 SUBJ: Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Chantessen, MN 55317 Planning Case 05-01 Rdministration Phone: 952.227.1400 Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1404 Fax: 952.227.1110 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1160 The applicant is requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a Fax: 952.227.1190 mixed use development. Engineering Phone: 952.227.1300 Phone: 952.227.1160 ACTION REQUIRED Fax: 952.227.1170 1. Finance City Council approval requires a majority of the City Council present. Phone: 952.227.1140 Planning Commission Minutes dated January 4, 2005. Fax: 952.227.1110 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1125 Phone: 952.227.1120 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 4, 2005 on the subject Fax: 952.227.1110 site. The Commission recommended 5-0 approval of the conceptual PUD. The Recreation Center major area that still needs to be addressed between conceptual and preliminary is 2310 Coulter Boulevard access off of Lake Susan Drive and to the Klin elhutz property. g P Pe Y• Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 RECOMMENDATION Planning d Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 The Planning Commission and staff recommend adoption of the motion as g P Fax: 952.227.1110 specified on page 8 of the staff report. Public Works ATTACHMENTS 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 1. Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 4, 2005. 2• Planning Commission Minutes dated January 4, 2005. Senior center Phone: 952.227.1125 3. Letter from MnDOT dated January 10, 2005. Fax: 952227.1110 4. Site Plan. Web Site wwwachanhassen.mn.us g:xplan\2005 planning cases\05-01 sand companies concept pud - 101 & lyman\exmutive summary.doc The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a cha ming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DATE: 1/4/05 CC DATE: 1/24/05 REVIEW DEADLINE: 1/31/05 CASE #: 05-01 BY: Aanenson, K PROPOSAL: Conceptual PUD of 24 acres for commercial, office and multi -family development. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Lyman Boulevard and realigned TH 101. APPLICANT: Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South 10'b Avenue. Waite Park, MN 56387 320-202-3100 PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Residential Single Family 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Mixed Use -Neighborhood Commercial or High Density Residential ACREAGE: 24 acres gross DENSITY: Residential portion of development Parcels 3 & 4 5.98 acres 11.54 units/acre Parcels 1 & 5 6.11 acres 11.95 units/acre Ifl SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a mixed use development. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving a rezoning because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 2 of 8 SUMMARY Sand Companies, Inc. is requesting concept PUD review for approximately 24 acres of land. This site is in the current Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). While utilities are available to the site it has not been developed because of the proposed improvements in conjunction with Highways 212, 101 and Lyman Boulevard. Scheduled improvements on these roads will not be completed until 2007 so it is unlikely that development will begin before then. Conceptual review of the property allows the developer to close on the purchase of the property and work with MnDot, the County and the City on the infrastructure improvements. The property is currently zoned RSF, Residential Single Family it is guided Mixed Use. The comprehensive plan states "the plan designates areas around the proposed TH 101/TH 212 interchanges as mixed use. This category has been established to accommodate either commercial or high-density residential developments. This area is in the current MUSA. The commercial use is intended to support or compliment the high-density development. If the city is to be developed commercially it shall be a business neighborhood commercial zoning district." State law states that the zoning and the land use designation be consistent. The land use designation is the official control. Therefore, a rezoning to a mixed-use PUD would be consistent with the land use. Staff is recommending approval of the concept PUD. BACKGROUND The subject site was given the mixed-use land use designation in the 1991 Comprehensive Plan update because of its proximity to the proposed 212/312 interchange at Highway 101. The land use designation of mixed use allows residential of 8-16 units per acre and neighborhood business district (see attached zoning standards). Southwest Metro Transit was recently rezoned to a similar mixed-use PUD. Under the next level of review the PUD design standards will be drafted to deal with the development standards. These standards will include architecture, height, setback, landscaping, buffering, signage, lighting, parking and permitted uses (see attached Ordinance No. 379). The intersection of Lyman Boulevard and State Highway 101 will be realigned with the improvements to Highway 212/312. These improvements are not scheduled to be completed until 2007. Development of this site will have to coordinate with these improvements. The applicant has met with the Planning Commission informally at two separate work sessions. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on December 16, 2004. The purpose of the concept review is to give further direction to the applicant as the development plan proceeds forward for conceptual review. Following is the requirements for conceptual PUD review. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 3 of 8 Concept PUD - What is required? The intent of the concept plan is to get direction from the Planning Commission and City Council without incurring a lot of expense. There will be a greater level of detail required through the city code and the conditions of approval in this report. Following are the requirements for conceptual PUD approval. Sec. 20-517 General concept plan. Chanhassen City Code (a) The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the city showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: (1) Overall gross and net density. (2) Identification of each lot size and lot width. (3) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. (4) General location and extent of public and common open space. (5) General location and type of land uses and intensities of development. (6) Staging and time schedule for development. (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 4 of 8 obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior thereto to owners of land within five hundred (500) feet of the boundary of the property and an on-site notification sign erected (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commission, the city council shall consider the proposal. If the planning commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the city council may proceed without the report. The council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions, as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four-fifths vote of the entire council. ANALYSIS The subject site is divided into 4 development parcels. Parcels 1 and 5 include the area north of the proposed Highway 212 interchange. This area is residential and proposes townhouses north of the extension of Lake Susan Drive and townhouses and an apartment building between the new Highway 212 and Lake Susan Drive. Density as proposed is just under 12 units per acre. Parcel 4 includes a 3 -story apartment building with 69 units. This development is also just under 12 units per acre. Parcel 3 or the rest of the site is proposed for commercial and office development. The southern portion of Parcel 3 is adjacent to residential development. Commercial development is not recommended in this area. The plan proposes a single -story office building. Staff believes that this provides a good buffer to the residential uses. The PUD ordinance also requires a 50 -foot buffer from the change in uses that are separated by a roadway. The restriction of uses and their location will be specified in the PUD. In addition, no drive- throughs will be permitted except for banks (see attached Land Use Detail Map). Following are conceptual comments that the various city departments have offered that need to be incorporated into the next submittal: Engineerine • The extension of Lake Susan Drive, from its current terminus to the intersection of new highway 101, will be required for development of and access to parcels 1 and 5. • The proposed driveway access locations off of Lake Susan Drive for parcels 1 and 5 must either be in the same location or meet minimum offset requirements of the City and/or County. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 5 of 8 The applicant should be aware that current Mn/DOT plans for the TH 212 improvements show a median in Lake Susan Drive, in front of the proposed access location to parcel 5. This would limit the access to a right-in/right-out only. Additionally, staff is recommending that access to parcel 5 be considered to come from a combined access with the property to the north, not off of Lake Susan Drive. • The locations of the internal public roadway which will serve parcels 3 and 4 will be reviewed in detail at the preliminary plat phase. The roadway will need to meet all current design requirements for City streets including: minimum width, alignment, and curve radii requirements. The location of the south intersection of the new road at Lyman Boulevard will need to be re -located to the east so that it's over the existing sewer and water lines. • Parcels 3 and 4 may be subject to future traffic signal and turn lane assessments for the benefit of the improvements to new highway 101. A temporary easement for trail construction will be required along the north side of Lyman Boulevard. • The right-of-way for old highway 101, between Lyman and Lake Susan Drive, will need to be vacated prior to any final plat recording for this site. • Public utility easements will be required over the existing sanitary sewer and water lines that go through the site. • The development will be required to meet existing site runoff rates for the 10- and 100 -year storms. Wetlands Existing Wetlands One ag/urban wetland exists on-site. The wetland has not been delineated. A wetland delineation must be submitted prior to submittal of a development plan. Wetland buffer widths of 16.5 feet must be maintained around all wetlands on-site. All structures must maintain a 40 -foot setback from wetland buffer edges. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. Storm Water And Erosion Control Storm Water Management The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District is proposing a regional storm water pond in the southwest corner of Parcels 3 and 4 as part of their Lake Riley Basic Water Management Plan. In addition, the City will be locating a trail on the north side of Lyman Boulevard. The applicant should work with the agencies to accommodate the necessary improvements. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 6 of 8 Erosion Control Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of S12Me Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. Surface Water Management Fees Surface Water Management fees will be calculated when the precise breakdown of land uses is solidified and must be paid to the City prior to final plat recording. (These fees range from approximately $3,800 to approximately $14,000 per acre based on development type.) Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. Landscapin¢ Landscaping requirements can be broken down into the following areas: Parking lots: All parking lots will require landscaping within and at the perimeter of the lots. Landscaped islands and peninsulas will be required in any lot over 6,000 square feet in size. All landscape islands are required to have a minimum inside width of 10 feet. Buildings: All buildings will be required to have foundation plantings. Residential areas will be required to meet subdivision tree preservation and reforestation requirements. Streets: Boulevard tree plantings are required along any collector roads, such as Lake Susan Drive. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 7 of 8 Bufferyards: Bufferyard plantings will be required between parcels with different land uses, along streets and on the property of any office, mixed use, or commercial properties. A bufferyard planting will be required along the property line abutting the Chanhassen Hills neighborhood. Other: The city promotes the planting of native species. Groupings of shade trees and shrubs along natural areas, such as wetlands, are recommended as well as in areas such as the tot lot or the common areas between townhomes. Staff also recommends an interior streetscape of boulevard trees. Park Parcels #1 & #5 - Proposed 73 units of apartment homes and townhomes Comprehensive Park Plan This site lies within the park service area (1/2 mile) of Chanhassen Hills Park. Convenient access to the park will be available via a south trail route or on -street along Lake Susan Drive. Full park fees shall be collected in lieu of parkland dedication at the rate in force at the time of final plat. Comprehensive Trail Plan A section of the City's comprehensive trail plan currently exists on the west side of Highway 101 at this location. This trail section needs to be maintained in its entirety. The future construction of Highway 212 will terminate the existing trail at the highway's north right-of-way line. However, a new trail connector along the northern edge of the new highway leading to the southern outlet of Lake Susan Drive and to Chanhassen Hills Park will be constructed. Sidewalks connecting the various buildings to the nearby trail system should be included in the plan. Parcels #3 & #4 —Proposed 69 units of apartment homes and neighborhood business Comprehensive Park Plan This site also lies within the park service area of Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the apartment building will utilize a trail connector over new Highway 212 to access the park. Full park fees shall be collected in lieu of parkland dedication at the rate in force at the time of final plat. Comprehensive Trail Plan New trails along the north side of Lyman Boulevard and east side of new Highway 101 south are being planned for construction as a part of the Highway 212 project. Appropriate sidewalk connections to both of these trails should be included in the project plans. Building Comments None at this time. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 8 of 8 Fire Marshal Comments None at this time. Housin¢ A part of the city's comprehensive plan deals with housing goals and policies. The city does participate in the Livable Communities Act and has goals for housing diversity and affordability. Because of the location of this site in close proximity to mass transit, staff is recommending that some of the housing be considered for "affordable housing." The city is lacking most in affordable rental housing but consideration should be give to both housing types. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning GeRmaissien reeeFimnend approval e City Council approve the concept PUD with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Submittal letter and application. 2. Public Hearing Notice and Property Owners List. 3. Notice of Neighborhood Meeting dated December 8, 2004. 3. Zoning Districts R-16 and BN. 4. Ordinance No. 379. 5. Land Use Detail Map. 6. Site Plan. 9:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-01 sand companies concept pud - 101 & lyman\smff report 1-4-05 revised.doc December 1, 2004 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED City of Chanhassen DEC 2 2004 Planning Commission 7700 Market Boulevard CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: General Concept Plan Review Sand Companies, Inc. Development (Curry Property) Dear Commission Members; ri • SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park, MN 56387-0727 Office: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320)202-3139 E-mail: SCIQSandCompanies.com Website: www.SandCompanies.com In accordance with Sec. 20-517. General Concept Plan, we are making submission of drawings and supporting information for the property generally known as Curry Property, but defined as Parcels #1 and #5 north of the proposed Highway #212 and Highway #101 intersection and Parcels #3 and #4 south of the same intersection. We provide the following information in answer to the 6 information request made: (1) Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways and road locations; See Sheet A-0.1 for proposed layout of the north sites. Parcel #5 is to be devoted to two story townhouse buildings with double garages. Parcel #1 is to support development of 16 townhomes and 51 apartment homes in a three story building over a basement parking garage. On site vehicle traffic will be on private drives, and pedestrians will be accommodated with internal sidewalks connecting to walks along Lake Susan Drive. See sheet A-0.2 for the proposed layout of the south site. Parcel 94, with it large wetland area, will serve as the site for a three story building with 69 apartment homes over a basement parking garage. Parcel #3 will be developed for Neighborhood Business uses including service type offices, financial institutions, convenience store with gas pumps, and some neighborhood retails shops such as submarine shops, optical shops, pizza stores etc. Vehicular traffic is organized along a public street connecting between proposed intersection of Highway #101 and the on-off ramp to #212, and intersection of Lyman Boulevard at the existing Highway #101 location. We propose an internal sidewalk along one side of this internal street. (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; As noted on the plans, the apartment buildings are three story over parking garages, mostly below grade. The apartment buildings are 10 feet floor to floor, so third floor is 20 feet above grade, with the building eave height at about 29 feet. Because we prefer fairly step roof pitches, we would expect total peak heights to approach 45 feet to the roof ridge, or 37 feet to average roof height. The townhomes are two story, with eave heights at about 18 feet and roof ridge heights in the range of 30 feet. The commercial buildings will all be limited to one story, and to the extent we can control the individual building designs we would expect use of sloped roofs with eaves heights in the range of 10-14 feet and ridges in the range of 24 to 36 feet. PASO -Core &Dm. Div\Chanha Lard Develops =R04-300WchiWc \Sim Related\PlanningCo=nissiml20104.doc SCAIU Construction ♦ Property Management ♦ Development O Equal Opporlanity Employer (3) Type, number or square footage or intensities of specific land use; Parcels #1 and #5 on the north will be used for multiple residential use. A total of 7 buildings is proposed. The sites total 6.11 acres after additional right-of-way is taken for highway development, resulting in a density of 11.95 units per acre. Parcel #4 on the south will also be multiple residential with a density of 11.54 units per acre. At Parcel #3, actual building sizes will be largely dictated by setbacks and parking requirements. The drawing on Sheet A-0.2 shows a total of 41, 500 sq. of building, but his is just to represent on possible approach to the development of these building sites. In some cases, somewhat larger buildings could be developed (financial institution) without burdening the site parking ability. (4) Number of dwelling units; A total of 142 living units is proposed. (5) Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved; Sheets A-0.1 and A-0.2 show the extent of development. Areas have been established for water retention ponds, although no detailed design analysis has been completed. The significant wetland on parcel #4 will be retained, and there is current interest on the part of watershed district in utilizing some portion of Parcel #4 as part of a larger area water treatment system. We plan to cooperate in that effort. (6) Staging and timing of development; Both the massive highway construction process and market forces will control development of these parcels. It would be our goal to have building construction activity underway on parcels #1 and #5 during the summer of 2005. We expect little commercial demand for Parcel #3 until highway traffic on #101 is in place, so construction starts there are more likely to be very late 2005 or into 2006. Sand Companies, Inc. plans to conduct a neighborhood information meeting from 7:00 to 9:00 PM on December IS at the Chanhassen Country Inn and Suites. Notices will be mailed to all residPpts of record within 500 feet of the property this week. Beyond the 11" x 17" site drawings we have prepared a large site drawing over an aerial photo that illustrates the relationship between our proposed development, the highway system and existing neighborhoods. We hope this is helpful to area residents and Planning Commission members alike. Sincerely PASM-Corel&Dm DMChanha Land Development#04300WrchiWq 'Site RelatedtPlanningCommistim120104.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: Sand Companies, Inc. ADDRESS: 366 S 10th Ave Waite Park MN 56387 TELEPHONE (Day Time) 320-202-3100 O5-oI CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT OWNER: Sand Companies, Inc. ADDRESS: 366 S 10th Ave Waite Park MN 56387 TELEPHONE: 320-202-3100 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non -conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit ✓ Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review ✓ Notification Sign Site Plan Review* X Escrow for Fling Fees/Attorney Cost" $50 CUP/SPR/1. Ar;/VAPfVVAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB Subdivision` TOTAL FEE $ 925.00 Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR-the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box ❑ In possesion Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. 'Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an S''/." X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. "Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: Sand Companies Development, Chanhassen MN LOCATION: Northwest & Southwest comers of intersection of Hiehwav 212 & 101 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached ALTA Survey for parcel descriptions. TOTAL ACREAGE. 21.77 WETLANDS PRESENT: ✓ YES NO PRESENT ZONING: RSF REQUESTED ZONING: PUD PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Mixed use REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Mixed use REASON FOR REQUEST: To allow development of the various sites in conformance with the guided uses. This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the spedfic ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in rrry name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for subrr>ission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. F] a/• v Date ':L ate Application Received on 1,4 a o 4 Fee Paid QE- Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 23, 2004, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Concept PUD, Sand Companies, Inc. — Planning Case No. 05-01 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Karen J. Engelhardt, Deputy Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day of 2004. Notary Public Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development for Proposal: commercial, office and multi -family development on approximately 22 acres of property Planning File: 05-01 Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Property Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Blvd. and the Location: future realigned Highway 101. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing Is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hail during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Comments: or e-mail kaanensorift.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission, City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party Is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included In the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: I Tuesday, January 4 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development for Proposal: commercial, office and multi -family development on approximately 22 acres of property Plannin Is: 05-01 Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Property Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Blvd. and the Location, future realigned Highway 101. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. he purpose of this public hearing Is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952.227-1139 Comments: or e-mail kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council, The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to oommerciaondustrlal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal, Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. is map is neither a legally McONed Rap nor a anrvey aM is net intended to be used as one. is map is a cm1earbOn Of records, infomatiOn and data located in various city, county, state and lerel offices and other sources regarding the area shove, and is to be used for reference "poses Only. The City does rot warrant that the Geographic Mfomation System (GIS) Data used prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used navigatonal, ena eW o any other mods eguinng enacting measurement d astable or e m a Precision in the depiction ot geographic features. d errors or dsmapancies are found ase contact 952-221-1107. The preceding asdaimer is previded pursuant to Minnesota Was §666.03, Sued. 21 (2000), and the user of this "rep ackr(rWadges that Me City shall "cit liable for any darrages, and expressly warnes all damns, and agrees to defend, inden city, and Id hamless the City from any and 0 dams brought by User, its employees or agents, or third Mw which arse our d the users access or use of data pimided. is rine is neither a legany recorded map nor a survey and is rot intended M be used as ons. is map is a conpilation d records, iMonration and data located in vanws city, runty, state and lora offices and other sources regarding the area sbovn, and is to be used for refmmi Poses Only. The City does rot a,arrmt Mat the Geographic Monmm System (GIS) Data used prepare this reap are mor Iree, and the City does not represent Mat the GIS Data can be used navigational, oacfdng o any other purpose requiring exacting measumrtant ot di tance or action or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or dscreperdns are fend =ase contact 952-221-1107. The precadng disdamer is provided pursuant to Mnnesee Was §466.03. Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this nap Mk owledges Ma the City shall not liable for any damages, and eWe" waives an dams, and agrees to defer,, irwmyd , me Id bamiess the City from any and all dams brought by User, its employees or agents, or third "ties which arise as of the users access or use 0 data provided. CHRISTOPHER T & AIMEE J ADAMS RICHARD C & SUSAN M AMBERSON MICHAEL B & CATHERINE 8690 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8549 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S ANDERSON CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8709 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT F & KAREN L ANDERSON 8561 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG R & GERALDINE BARETTE 8695 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TERRY LEE & MARI T BERANAK 8576 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EDWARD S & NANCY J COUGHLIN 587 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK A & LAURENE FARRELL 801 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS P HAGMAN & SUSAN M BARTENETTI 625 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DANIEL M & MELISSA L HERZOG 8790 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RONALD G & JOYCE L HORR 8513 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG A & MICHELLE D ALINE 8705 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317' R STEVEN & MAURA BARNETT 8709 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOSHUA E & CORA L CONKLIN 8990 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES A CURRY 6105 EDEN PRAIRIE RD #17 EDINA MN 55436 JASON J GILBERTSON & KATJAJEANNERET 583 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HUSSAM HASSOUN 8537 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER & DEBORA K HOL 8687 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRIAN W & KRISTIN A HOULE 880 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RUSSELL G BAHENSKY 8552 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WILLIAM E BENSON 8596 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ALAN COSENTINO & SHERRI BEER 8572 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NORMAN &JACQUELINE ENGEL 8699 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG D GUTSCHOW & BARBARA J CLAYTON 8691 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGORY J & SUSAN L HENKEL 8699 MARY I01F rIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TROY & JENNIFER HOLASEK 8556 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BENJAMIN R K & DONNA M JOHNSON 8521 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICIA JOHNSON SHANNON G & MICHELLE A KERN LAWRENCE C & ELIZABETH KLEIN 8715 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 607 SUMMERFIELD DR 9170 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 AL & M J KLINGELHUTZ TRUST S & TRACY L KURVERS C/O ALOYSIUS & M J KLINGELHUTZ MARK CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 8560 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANTHONY LARSON & LINDSAY NELSON 8545 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HARLAN C LEOPOLD 8553 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID S & JANICE A LUNDQUIST 8705 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL G & KAREN L MCNEIL 8695 MARY JANE C I R CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TIMOTHY S & TAMARA S MILLER 579 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL W & ANA E MORENO 603 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVE J & MARY A PANENO 8564 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY A & MICHELLE M REITAN 8900 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DENNIS H & RUTH L LAUFENBURGER 8673 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LONG LI & YING Z WANG 8557 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SO VAN LY & SI LEAN `/KUN UNG 8509 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CYNTHIA ANN MILLER 891 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK L & KIM M MISMASH 591 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CRAIG L & PATRICIA A MULLEN 611 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SEONGWOO PARK & MIN JEONG HAN 8580 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL & MELISSA ROHRMOSER 8698 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & STACEY G LAKOSKY 8533 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KHANH & KHIEM LE 631 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 ROBERT B MARTINOVICH & PATRICIA A MARTINOVICH 8592 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREG ALLAN MILLER 8801 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LISA K MOORE 8682 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC S & JULIE A OYEN 615 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PHOULITHAT PHANDANOUVONG & VATSANA PHANDANOUVONG 8529 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RAYMOND J ROOB JR & CHAE SUK ROOB 8584 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS A & GRETA K ROSE JEFFREY A & TANYA L SCHNEIDER PAUL C SCHNETTLER & 8541 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8702 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N KATE D WARD SCHNETTLER CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 599 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SCH AMY J TE ETAL KEITH E & LISA L SCHWEGLER MARK & KRISTINA SCHWENDINGER 8990QUINN R RD 619 SUMMERFIELD DR 8708 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N PO BOXX 6688 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DONALD T SINNIGER & MICHELE M ABEL 600 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES JONATHON SOMMERS & KAREN D ROGGE 8683 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SPRINGFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSN 7100 MADISON AVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 LESLIE E TIDSTROM 8679 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 UTPAL R VAIDYA & LEENA UTPAL VAIDYA 861 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID M SMITH & PATRICE N LUNDGREN-SMITH 8568 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & JODI L SOTEBEER 8565 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL MN 55155 ABBA J TREGOBOV & SUSANA P MACHADO-TREGOBOV 8714 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN H & RUTH M VANCE 8588 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JUDSON E & JILL C SNELL 8694 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CURTIS A & SUSAN M SPERLING 8525 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRUCE A & SHEILA M TANQUIST 8569 CHANW.SSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP INC ATTN: TAX DEPT M/S 624 PO BOX 7028 BEDMINSTER NJ 07921 BRYAN J & LISA C VAN NINGEN 8686 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMI D WALKER CORY M & PAMELA S WATKINS FRANK T & MARY LOU WHALEY 8517 CHANHASSEN HILLS DR S 595 SUMMERFIELD DR 851 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 December 8, 2004 Greetings from Sand Companies, Inc. SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park. VIN 56387-0727 Office: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320)202-3139 E-mail: SO"a SandCompanics.com NVebsite: www.SandCompanies.com Sand Companies, Inc. is proposing to dGrlop the northwest and southwest quadrants of the future. realigned Highway 10' and -die new Highway 312 (formerly 212) into a neighborhood commercial and residential development. We are inviting you to an informal neighborhood meeting to answer any questions and invite your input about our proposed development. Date: Thursday, December 16, 2004 Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: Country Suites Chanhassen 591 West 78' Street Chanhassen, NIN 55317 Pine and Oak Rooms 952-937-24'24 If you have any questions in advance of the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me at (320) 202-3100 or via e-mail at RAHennirgs@SandCompanies.com. You can also visit our website at www.SandCompanies.com to learn about our current developments. Thank you. Senior Architect Construction ♦ Property Management ♦ Development Equal Opportunih' Employer Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING: Public Present: Name Address Jamie Thelen 366 South 10th Avenue, Waite Park, MN Jim Sand 366 South 10th Avenue, Waite Park, MN Al Klingelhutz 8600 Great Plains Boulevard Richard A. Hennings 366 South 10th Avenue, Waite Park, MN Christopher Hol 8687 Chanhassen Hills Drive North Keith Collins 7420 Coventry Way, Edina Patty & Craig Mullen 611 Summerfield Drive April Halbe 9151 Great Plains Boulevard Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. Lillehaug: ...and then can you comment on the very northerly parcel, parcel number 5. I think I missed it. Why is that odd shaped right-of-way skewing down? What's the deal with that? Aanenson: Yeah. That's Qwest has a building there. Qwest, a switch station. Lillehaug: So the City's going to maintain permanent right-of-way over that whole entire area? Aanenson: That's not our's. It was sold to Qwest so yeah. See you've got this whole triangle piece here. What it does is. Lillehaug: Can you show that in outline, just to make sure we're talking about the same thing. Aanenson: Can you zoom in? You're talking about this piece right here. Lillehaug: Right. I mean it's approximately 60 feet plus or minus wide for you know that entire stretch and is that, so you're saying that's not going to be city right-of-way? Aanenson: There will be right-of-way in front of it, but what I'm saying is that, if you look at this is a picture superimposed over. There's a restricted median right here. So you can come in right but how do you get out? There's a median. Lillehaug: I don't think we're on the same page. Looking at this, it's this whole area right here. Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Aanenson: Yeah, I don't... Saam: It's not right-of-way Steve. I think you think it's right-of-way. It's not right-of-way. Lillehaug: That's the question. Okay, thank you. Sacchet: Any other questions of staff? No? With that I'd like to invite the applicant to come forward to give us your presentation. The short version if I may ask for it. Jim Sand: Agreed. Thank you Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, city staff. My name is Jim Sand and I'm the Vice President of Sand Companies. Vice President of Development and I have with us tonight part of our team. Our senior architect, Richard Hennings is here with us and our company President Jamie Thelen. And I don't have a lot to add to Kate's comments other than we did hold a neighborhood meeting on December 16`h. We had approximately 30 neighbors and one of the commission members attend. We had a lot of good feedback. A lot of good questions and felt that it was a real good chance to meet our neighbors. With that I'll turn it over to Richard who has larger renditions of what we're proposing and go through that. Sacchet: Thank you. Richard Hennings: I think in the interest of time I would just cover, I think Kate did an admirable job of explaining our project to us so I'll just cover a few of the things that I think are pertinent. The issue of the. Sacchet: Excuse me. Do you mind directing the microphone towards you a little bit? Richard Hennings: Close enough? Sacchet: Yeah, thank you. Richard Hennings: Speaking to the issue of the median on Lake Susan Drive, and you may have more current information than I did. When we first started the project we were told that that meeting was going to be there. I contacted, and I don't remember the name but I contacted the engineer and he told me at that time, he thought 115 feet, and so he was encouraging me to say it's okay to put driveways off. I understand though on the other hand you had a conversation as recently as yesterday so. Aanenson: No. All plans, just to be clear, as in the previous one, all plans go to affected jurisdictions so obviously this plan went up to MnDot. We met with Jon Chiglo who is in charge of this whole project for 212 and he was aware that they're trying to draft or look at how we solve the problem because he's aware of the conflict so. Richard Hennings: I think the other thing I just want to bring up, we had talked earlier about the roadway through the southern parcel and right now the drawing that we had prepared is, I'm not a traffic engineer but I try to reflect what I thought would be kind of a traffic calming road here and so I portrayed the road as not terribly wide and with intentional fairly sharp corners. As Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 ways of slowing the traffic and not encouraging it as a cut through. So kind of a fine line between a convenient to get here but not so convenient that it's a better way than going through the intersection at Lyman and I guess that's the direction we would give to civil engineers when we're talking to them and see if they can translate that into real engineering, but so right now it is intentionally drawn with 90 degree comers that would have a fairly tight radius I guess I'd describe it, so that that's one of the points you'd have to slow down, and that the roadway would not be very wide and so that we wouldn't have passing lanes and all those kinds of things. And the one other piece of information I thought we should share. The local watershed district is developing a wide area, an area wide project for purposes of water clarity on Lake Riley and some other things. And they have contacted us in regard to utilizing part of the wetland here as part of that project and what they're suggesting that they may excavate part of that wetland and create more open water as a holding pond, a fairly deep holding pond so they get quality control. That's what they're looking for. Not quantity control but quality control, and we would cooperate with them in that our other ponds would have to do with quantity control and their's would do with quality control so I would think as our project moves along we'll probably see some more information on that develop there. And then the last thing about affordable housing. Sand Companies is an active developer of tax credit housing. We have done a dozen projects over the last 8-10 years. Currently we'll have one more townhouse project in St. Joseph, Minnesota that will be constructed this year, so we are interested in that. Obviously you know it's a competitive process and just because we can all say we're interested doesn't mean that the Minnesota Housing Finance Corporation will see fit to do that. But it would be of interest to us to explore using tax credit financing for one of the buildings on the north side, and particularly the apartment building. So while we have designated a 3 story apartment building, we have to admit that we don't have a clear market for that. We have also given consideration to developing a senior cooperative on that site the same way because we think that's an interesting market here, so the usage we really haven't clarified there yet but I think you can safely assume that we will explore the tax credit housing automatically and to the extent that it is possible so. With that I guess I would just turn it over to see if there are any other questions. Sacchet-. Excellent. Any questions from the applicant? No? Thank you very much. Appreciate it. With that, this is a public hearing. I'd like to open this for comments from anybody here who'd like to address this item. Please come forward at this time, if you want to address this item. And state your name and address for the record please. Let us know what you have to say. Patty Mullen: My name is Patty Mullen. I live at 611 Summerfield Drive. I'd like to start by saying unfortunately I wasn't able to make the neighborhood meetings and I wonder if there's another opportunity to get a little more input before I maybe start addressing concerns that might not be. And my biggest concerns would be that the development stay consistent with the things that are already developed in the area so as not to jeopardize the integrity of those. And I need a better understanding of buffering. Aanenson: We can certainly facilitate a meeting where we can come in and go through that specifically what the PUD buffering is and all that. We'd be happy to do that. Patty Mullen: Okay, thank you. it1 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: Thank you very much. Are there any other residents? Yes, if you want to please come forward and state your name and address and what you have to share with us. Chris Hol: My name's Chris Hol. I live at 8687 Chanhassen Hills Drive North so I'm on the very north end of this project. Now my concern is fust of all apartment buildings. I mean you know if it's a two level building, that's fine. But I think 3, you know we moved out this way for the beauty of it and now I don't want to be looking out my back window at apartment buildings. Thankfully I'm not as affected as some of my neighbors are, but the other concern I would say is now, 101, is that going to be cul-de-saced? Saam: Yeah. Chris Hol: So that will be down there. There won't be anyway to cut through? Aanenson: Yeah, at the end of this, the old 101 will be cul-de-saced ... also towards the end where the creek is. Chris Hol: Right. Okay. Aanenson: It would not be for cut through traffic either. Chris Hol: Yeah, because the only other thing I would, my concern is, and I know it's been brought up is the Lake Susan Drive. You know people that don't want to come all the way up here are now going to maybe cut through and it's going to cause a lot more traffic for us. Aanenson: Yeah, that was one of the things we talked about with the traffic study. Chris Hol: Good, okay. That's all I want to say. Thank you. Sacchet: Anybody else want to address this item? Yes, Al. Please. Al Klingelhutz: Chairman, Planning Commission members. I'm AI Klingelhutz and in 8600 Great Plains Boulevard and most of the land we're talking about here tonight was land that I farmed for 60 some years. Was in my family since 1862 and I guess the one concern I have is this piece here. Aanenson: It's a connection, as I mentioned before. This is Mr. Klingelhutz' property. The original farmstead. Is how do you get access to these pieces. Al Klingelhutz: Through this property right here. And the median on Lake Susan Drive which we talked about. Kind of eliminates pretty much of the access to this 7 or 8 acre piece here. And I have a concern about that. And Kate and I have, and my two sons who plan on developing this property. It's going to be a family development. It's been a family farm. It's going to be a family development. Neal has been in construction for many years now. Our house on Lake 4 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Susan was the first house he built on his own. Before that he was working for some other developers. But that was the first house he built on his own and he's been building homes ever since that time and that's 21-22 years ago that he built our house. So anyway, I'm just saying this so you don't have to worry that he's. Sacchet: He knows what he's doing. Al Klingelhutz: He knows what he's doing, let's put it that way. But I do feel that there should be an access to this property somewhere on Lake Susan Drive. It could be up on this end. I know they don't want to go any closer than 600 feet from a major intersection so it'd have to be up here quite a ways, and I think there wouldn't be any problem with that...family development because they would like to have access to that same Lake Susan Drive at some point because they're going to have a small development on the north side of that, on Lake Susan Drive. That's what I was complaining about... we've known this is going to happen for a long time. As the zoning's been there for this property and for the rest of my property plus the piece on the east side of the road. It's been pretty well publicized that some of these things are going to actually happen in this area. So that is my, our main concern is the fact that we sure would like an access to Lake Susan Drive. Sacchet: Thank you. Al Klingelhutz: That isn't to say we're going to go out through Chan Hills but we thought this way we could get onto 101, in and out. Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you very much. Slagle: Quick question if I may to staff. Al Klingelhutz: Any questions? Sacchet: For staff. Slagle; I'm just curious is, Kate why wouldn't we, to Mr. Klingelhutz' property, access it off the cul-de-sac to 101? Aanenson: We could come off this way, but you know again when you're putting additional trips on the backs of these homes, it'd be nice if we didn't have to do that. Because then you could actually build a buffer along here. If you follow what I'm saying there. That'd be the best. But that may not happen. You know certainly, when this is a private development, a PUD. A private street. Typically we don't connect two specific, so you know, can we force it to be a public street, so we're really trying to work with both properties together to make it work the best for the layout, but again then you're just forcing more trips around. Could it happen that way? Yeah, but. Slagle: Do you have a preference Mr. Klingelhutz? Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Al Klingelhutz: Do we have apartments? Slagle: No a preference as to, could you access? Al Klingelhutz: I would prefer if we could get right onto Lake Susan Drive and circle up to Lake Susan Drive here and then come out to get over to the new 101. Slagle: Alright. Sacchet: And that's somewhat in line with what you presented in the beginning, isn't it? Aanenson: Yep. That's what we're working on. Sacchet: Okay. Al Klingelhutz: Keep that in mind because it really is a big preference. Sacchet: And it looks like staff is already pursuing that from their angle as well. Thank you. Anybody else wants to speak up to this item. Seeing nobody, I'm going to close the public hearing. Bring it back to the commission for comments, discussion. Want to start this item? Lillehaug: Sure. I'll rattle mine off. It's a concept PUD. I do want to make a note that in the developer's letter to us they indicate heights of buildings and some of the parameters that at this point I don't plan on reviewing and I expect them not to hold us to those elevations. Work with staff on developing the PUD to make sure it fits. So I just want to make sure that you have those parameters in there but we shouldn't be adhering to them at this point. Number one comment, and this is my major comment is, the two north parcels there and the Lake Susan Hills Drive. I've expressed my concerns previously regarding the cut through traffic and I know staffs aware of that but we really need to get a handle on. Not the traffic that's being generated from these two north parcels but the potential for all the cut through traffic that can go through on Lake Susan Drive because I see that as a very large potential, and if I live on Lake Susan Hills Drive, it's a very direct connect without having to go through the numerous signals and I would use that, so it's, I have great concerns there so we really need to take a look at doing something there and making sure that we're not introducing cut through traffic so extreme that everyone of them residents are going to be very upset with what happened here. The parcel 5 to the north, somehow you know it split off from the parcel across from Lake Susan Drive to the south. It really needs to be worked in with something to the north, and I'm assuming that they have similar zoning or guidances. Okay, good. Berming. We talked, staff talks about landscaping and screening but I want to make sure that we're including berming in addition to landscaping as screening. Traffic study, reiterate that. Be very clear that I would like to see a traffic study for the Lake Susan Drive connection as well the other road through the southerly site. And then definitely it needs, this site needs to work with the developer on the Klingelhutz property and access to the property to the north there and I think I have all my comments. 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: Good comments. Thanks Steve. Dan, anything to add? Keefe: My only comment would be, at least from where I sit, it seems like the developer's really doing a nice job of kind of engaging with the city and everybody else and I commend them on that and that's it. Sacchet: Thank you. Kurt. Papke: Nothing to add. Sacchet: Rich. Yeah, I think everybody's expressed very clearly. I mean it looks like, it's very encouraging that the direction that staff is exploring matches what the concern is from the Klingelhutz property to the north. To line up that access and I support it. I think we're on a good track with it. With that I'd like to have a motion. Papke: I'll make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends, approves the concept PUD with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. Sacchet: We have a motion. Is there a second? Lillehaug: Second. Sacchet: Are there any friendly amendments? Lillehaug: The amendments as I indicated in my comments. Sacchet: Okay. Is that acceptable? Papke: Acceptable. Papke moved, Lillehaug seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01, Sand Companies, Inc., with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report and Commissioner Lillehaug's comments. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District "�°�,•.�` Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 January 10, 2005 Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 RECEIVED JAN 14 2005 MY OF CHANHASSEN SUBJECT: Sand Companies Concept Planned Unit Development Mn/DOT Review SO4-104 Northwest Comer of Re -Aligned TH 101 and Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1009 Dear Ms Aanenson: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced site plan in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following issues: • These preliminary layouts do not show any proposed intersection design or relationship to proposed TH 101 ramp/loop design. We need geometric plans and dimensions of this development in relation to Mn/DOT's ramps and loops in order to review this project in full. Please contact Lynn Clarkowski, Area Engineer, at (651) 634-2103, or Ivnn.clarkowskiedot.state.mn.us if you have any questions about this information request. • For the northerly site (Lake Susan Drive), the driveways off Lake Susan Drive should be opposite from each other and as far from TH 101 as possible, at the minimum 660 feet from TH 101. For the southerly site (Lyman Blvd), there must be a public street connection from TH 101 all the way to Lyman Blvd, for example, no dead ends, and it must have at least three lanes of approach (right, through, and left) to TH 101. A right turn lane and a left turn lane are required on TH 101 for this new street which must be aligned properly opposite Mn/DOT's ramps. Contact Lars Impola, Traffic Studies Engineer, Mn/DOT, at 651-634-2379 or Jars.imoola(a dot.state.mn.us if you have any questions about these issues. More information is needed to determine whether a Mn/DOT drainage permit will be required for this project. Current drainage rates to Mn/DOT right of way must be maintained and applications for a drainage permit should include hydrologic computations for 10 and 100 year storms, drainage area maps and any other relevant information for pre- and post - construction conditions. Any wetland impacts that this development creates will need to be mitigated by the City or the developer. Please contact Martin Korthank at Mn/DOT Water Resources Engineering (651.634.2077) or (martin.korthank(a,dot.state.mn.us) with any questions regarding drainage permits. An equal opportunity employer As a reminder, Lyman Boulevard is County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 18. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. The County must review any changes to its County State Aid Highway system so that they stay within its system limitations. You may obtain additional information regarding State Aid rules and policies in any of the following ways: ➢ http://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateai shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ➢ Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ➢ Please go to hn://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. ➢ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding Mn/DOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design section at (651) 582-1293. Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/teesW/utility. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Keith Van Wagner (651-582-1443), or Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. • As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. • As our request, please send an electronic .pdf file copy of your final plan submittal for our record keeping purposes to u1M.jacksonaa,dot.state.mmus . Please refer to Mn/DOT Review # SO4-104 when emailing the .pdf file. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 582-1724 or Tod Sherman at (651) 582-1548. Sincerely, Mary E. Jac n JJJ Intermediate Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Richard A. Hennings, Sand Companies, Inc. II RC6I5 i B Q NORTH NOTE: SETBACKS 50-C' @ HW1 #212 { II OI 30-0 EL5EWMCRE 51- APARTMENT HOMES 22- TO»MHOM6 73 - TOTAL LIVING UNIT5 4.91 ACRE5 - PARCEL#I 1.2 ACRE5 - PARCEL #5 G.1 1 ACRE5 - I I .95 UNIT5 / ACRE PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PARCELS #I � #5 5CALE: In — 100-0° *►SCI Sunt Companies fne $36 S..m TemF Awnue ry MB- 727 Ww ?-AM 50874W offs_ (310) 2O 3100 Fu: 020) 201-3139 WeMOa' ww.SwtGmyvn/nron 6-MVY: SCIQSanJGnpnb.ron CITYOCCHA RECEIVEDNHgEBEN DEC 2 2004 CHA NHASSEN PLANNING UEPT m°p�i+�xy ecw°1"ma nwussu rw SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.1 PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PARCELS #3 �- #4 5CALE, I"- IDo'-a NOTE! 5CTBACK / 5a.V®HW #2121#101 30,-a ELSEWHERE 69 - APARTMENT HOMES 5.98 ACM - PARCEL N4 \ 11.54 UNITS/ACRE / / 2�0 f WEf LAND f f I I I LYMAN BOULEVARD 11 \ \\ — tl'/ 5VICE OE 5TORrCf +i+P 4-=41tw�__-__----_ I S I MCI Msaud tmd Awv M• POB -IS] WnM PvkA 51117-0727 OJfbc (2V 2033700 ➢ss' p30) IOSJU9 Cl v OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING )PT �Iwm SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.2 ZONING § 20-680 (2) The minimum lot frontage is as follows: a. If a two-family dwelling is located on the lot, fifty (50) feet per dwelling unit, except that if the lot fronts on a cul-de-sac, the lot shall be fifty (50) feet in width at the building setback line. b. If a townhouse or multiple -family project is located on the lot; one hundred fifty (150) feet. (3) The minimum lot depth is one hundred ,fifty-five (155) feet. (4) The maximum lot coverage is thirty-five (35) percent. (5) The setbacks are as follows: a. For front yards, twenty-five (25) feet. b. For rear yards, twenty-five (25) feet. C. For side yards, ten (10) feet. (6) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, three (3) stories/ thirty-five (35)feet. (Ord.. b. For accessory structures, one (1) story/fifteen (15) feet. See. 20-676. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "R-12" District: (1) Reserved. (2) Temporary real estate office and model homes. (Ord. Nu. iau, y u, 4-ac-ou, Sees. 20-677-20-679. Reserved. DIVISION 2. "R-16" DISTRICT' Sec. 20-680. Intent. The intent of the R-16 District is to provide multifamily residential structures at a maximum net density of sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre on land guided for high density residential uses by the city comprehensive plan. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90) `Editor's note—Section 1 of Ord. No. 123, adopted Mar. 12, 1990, amended Art. XV by adding §§ 20-680-20-684. At the editor's discretion, the new provisions have been included as Div. 2 to this article. Supp. No. 9 1219 § 20-681 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE Sec. 20-681. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in an R-16 District: (1) Multifamily dwellings. (2) Public and private parks and open space. (3) Utility services. (4) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90; Ord. No. 259, § 19, 11-12-96) Sec. 20-682. Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in an R-16 District: (1) Garage. (2) Storage building. (3) Swimming pool. (4) Tennis court. (5) Signs as per allowed in R-12 District. (6) Home occupations. (7) One (1) dock. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90) Sec. 20-683. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in an R-16 District: `I, Churches. (2) Day care center. (3) Group home serving from seven (7) to sixteen (16) persons. (4) Health services. `0) Recreational beach lots. LOTemporary real estate office and model home. (-1) Or Towers and antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. Sec. 20-684. Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an R-16 District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum lot area is as follows; a. Two thousand seven hundred (2,700) square feet per dwelling unit. Supp_ No. 9 1220 ZONING.. § 20-692 - (2) The maximum lot coverage is fifty (50) percent. (3) The building setbacks are as follows: a. For front yards, fifty (50) feet. b. For rear yards, fifty (50) feet. C. For side yards, fifty (50) feet. (4) Parking setbacks shall be twenty-five (25) feet from all property lines. (5) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, three (3) storie8/thirty-five (35) feet b. For accessory structures one (1) story/fifteen (15) feet. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90) Sees. 20-685-20-690. ARTICLE XVI. 'BN' NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT See. 20-691. The intent of the "BN" District is to provide for limited low intensity neighborhoodretail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 10(5-10-1), 12-15-86) See. 20-692. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in a "BN" District: (1) Antenna as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (2) Community center. (3) Convenience stores without gas pumps. (4) Day care center. (5) Health services. (6) Home Furnishings. () Offices. (8) Personal services. (9) Private clubs and lodges. (10) Shopping center. (11) Small appliance repair shop Supp. No -10 1CL1 § 20-692 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE (12) Specialty Retail Shop. (13) Utility services. (14) Veterinary clinics. Sec. 20-693. Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in a 'BN District: (1) Parking lots. (2) Reserved. (3) Signs. (4) Temporary outdoor sales (subject to the requirements of section 20312). Sec. 20-694. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in a 'BN' District: (1) Bed and breakfast establishments. (2) Convenience store with gas pumps. (3) Drive-in banks including automated kiosks. (4) Fast food restaurants without a drive-through as part of a shopping center. (5) Motor Fuel Station. (6) Reserved. § 4(7) (7) Standard restaurants. Sec. 20-695. Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in a 'BN' District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum district area is three (3) acres. This paragraph may be waived in the case of expansion to an existing district. (2) The minimum lot area is fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. (3) The minimum lot frontage is seventy-five (75) feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall have a minimum frontage of sixty (60) feet in all districts. (4) The minimum lot depth is one hundred fifty (150) feet. (5) The maximum lot coverage including all structures and paved surfaces is sixty-five (65) percent. Supp. No. 10 1222 ZONING § 20-695 (6) Off-street parking shall comply with district setback_ requirements except: a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad right-of-way, except as provided in sections 20-1191 and 20-1192 pertaining to landscaping require- ments. b. There is no minimum setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. C. The minimum setback is fifty (50) feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. d. The minimum setback is twenty-five (25) feet for side street side yards. e. Parking setbacks along public rights-of-way may be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that one -hundred -percent screening is provided at least five (5) feet above the adjacent parking lot. The intent of this section is that the city is willing to trade a reduced setback for additional landscaping that is both an effective screen and of high quality aesthetically. Acceptable screening is to be comprised of berming and landscaping. Screening through the use of fencing is not permitted. (7) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, one (1) story. b. For accessory structures, one (1) story. (8) Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards, thirty-five 35 feet. b. For rear yards, thirty (80 eet. C. For side yards, fifteen (15.1 feet. d. The minimum setback is fifty (50) feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. e. Buffer yards: The city comprehensive plan establishes.a requirement for buffer yards. Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density uses. In these areas, a fifty -foot buffer yard is to be provided where the interface occurs along a public street, a one -hundred -foot buffer yard is required where the interface occurs on internal lot lines. The buffer yard is an additional setback requirement. It is to be cumulatively calculated with the required setbacks outlined above. The full obligation to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use. The buffer yard is intended to provide additional physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use. As such, they will be required to be provided with a combination of berming, landscaping and/or tree preservation to maximize the buffering potential. To the extent deemed feasible by the city, new plantings shall be Supp. No. 9 1223 § 20-695 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE designed to require the minimum of maintenance, however, such maintenance as may be required to maintain consistency with the approved plan, shall be the obligation of the property owner. Buffer yards shall be covered by a permanently recorded conservation easement running in favor of the city. In instances where existing topography and/or vegetation provide buffering satisfac- tory to the city, or where quality site planning is achieved, the city may reduce buffer yard requirements by up to fifty (50) percent. The applicant shall have the full burden of demonstrating compliance with the standards herein. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 10(5-10-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 94, §§ 1, 2, 7-25-88; Ord_ No. 136, §§ IA, 1B, 1-28-91) Sec. 20-696. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the 'BN" District: (1) Churches. (2) Reserved. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90; Ord. No. 243, § 4, 2-13-95) Secs. 20-697-20-710. Reserved. ARTICLE XVII. 'BH" HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS SERVICES DISTRICT Sec. 20-711. Intent. The intent of the "BH" District is to provide for highway oriented commercial development restricted to a low building profile. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 11(5-11-i;, 12-.5-86) Sec. 20-712. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in a "BH" District: (1) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (2) Car wash. (3) Community center. (1.1) Convenience stores without gas pumps. (5) Day care center. WFast food restaurant ) C7) Financial institutions with/or without drive through services. Supp. No_ 9 1224 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 379 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property as described below from RSF, Single Family Residential District to PUD -Mixed Use, Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use: All of west half of the northwest quarter of section 24, township 116, range 23, lying southerly of the right-of-way for TH 312 and easterly of right-of-way line of realigned TH 101, and north of the right-of-way for Lyman Boulevard. Section 2. The rezoning of this property is subject to the following design standards: PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a Mixed Use PUD including a Transit Oriented Development, Neighborhood Commercial and Residential. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses • The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with meeting the daily needs of the neighborhood and the transit facility users. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on these lots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Commercial and transit uses shall be limited to the area located north of the access point off of Highway 101. Residential uses shall be located south of the Highway 101 access. • Small to medium sized restaurant -not to exceed 8,000 square feet per building (no drive-thru windows) • Office • day care • neighborhood scale commercial up to 8,000 square feet per building footprint • convenience store without gas pumps • specialty retail (book store jewelry, Sporting Goods sale/rental, Retail Sales, Retail Shops, Apparel Sales, etc.) • personal services (an establishment or place of business primarily engaged in providing individual services generally related to personal needs, such as a tailor shop, Shoe Repair, Self-service Laundry, Laundry Pick-up Station, Dry Cleaning, dance studios, etc). • Park and Ride not to exceed 800 spaces. • Residential High Density (8-16 units per acre). C. Prohibited Ancillary Uses • Drive thru Windows • Outdoor storage and display of merchandise d. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks: Boundary Building and Parking Setback .Lyman Boulevard 50 feet Highway 101 35 feet north of the Highway 101 access and 50 feet south of the 101 access Highway 212 excluding transit shelters and rams 50 feet -Easterly Project Property Line 100 Feet Internal Project property lines 0 Feet Hard Surface Coverage 50% Commercial and Transit Facility Hard Surface Coverage 70% Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less Maximum Commercial Building/Structure Height 11 story Maximum Park and Ride Ramp excluding the elevator shaft and stair well 25 or 3 stories, I whichever is less e. Non Residential Building Materials and Design 1. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. The intent is to create a neighborhood and transit friendly development. 2. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Major exterior surfaces of all walls shall be face brick, stone, glass, stucco, architecturally treated concrete, cast in place panels, decorative block, or cedar siding. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted block or brick. Bright, long, continuous bands are prohibited. 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. Exposed cement ("cinder") blocks shall be prohibited. 4. Metal siding, gray concrete, curtain walls and similar materials will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials, or as trim or as HVAC screen, and may not exceed more than 25 percent of a wall area. 5. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 6. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. The buildings shall have vaned and interesting detailing. The use of large unadorned, concrete panels and concrete block, or a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in materials, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public ways shall be prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. 8. There shall not be underdeveloped backsides of buildings. All elevations shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. - 9. The materials and colors used for each building shall be selected in context with the adjacent building and provide for a harmonious integration with them. Extreme variations between buildings in terms of overall appearance, bulk and height, setbacks and colors shall be prohibited. f. Residential Standards Building exterior material shall be a combination of fiber -cement siding, vinyl siding, stucco, or brick with support materials such as cedar shakes, brick and stone or approved equivalent materials as determined by the city. 2. Each unit shall utilize accent architectural features such as arched louvers, dormers, etc. 3 3. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 4. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building or landscaping. 5. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick and stone. 6. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. g. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights-of-way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. 1. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to, truck loading areas, trash storage, parking lots, Large unadorned building massing, etc. 2. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 3. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells shall be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. 4. Undulating berms, north of Lyman Boulevard and east of Highway 101 shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. 6. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. h. Street Furnishings Benches, kiosks, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. 11 L Signage The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment and the business's ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet the city's goals: • Establish standards which permit businesses a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise their name and service; • Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination; • Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; • Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; • Preserve and protect property values; • Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; • Limit temporary commercial signs and advertising displays which provide an opportunity for grand opening and occasional sales events while restricting signs which create continuous visual clutter and hazards at public right-of-way intersections. 1. Proiect Identification Sign: One project identification sign shall be permitted for the development at the entrance off of Highway 101. Project identification signs shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. 2. Monument Sign: One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrance to the development off of Lyman Boulevard. This sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. 3. Wall Signs: a. The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend greater than 20 feet above the ground. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, or translucent facing. b. Illuminated signs that can be viewed from neighborhoods outside the PUD site,. are prohibited. c. Tenant signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant's proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 15% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. 4. Festive Flags/Banners a. Flags and banners shall be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. b. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric or vinyl. c. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. d. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two feet. e. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. L Flags and banners which are tom or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. 5. Building Directory a. In multi -tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. 6. Directional Signs a. On -premises signs shall not be larger than four (4) square feet. The maximum height of the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet from the ground. The placement of directional signs on the property shall be so located such that the sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties (including site lines or confusion of adjoining ingress or egress) or the general appearance of the site from public rights-of-way. No more than four (4) signs shall be allowed per lot. The city council may allow additional signs in situations where access is confusing or traffic safety could be jeopardized. b. Off -premises signs shall be allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately routed through residential streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. c. Bench signs are prohibited except at transit stops as authorized by the local transit authority. d. Signs and Graphics. Wherever possible, traffic control, directional and other public signs should be consolidated and grouped with other street fixtures and furnishings to reduce visual clutter and to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement. A system of directional signs should also be established to direct traffic within the commercial area and away from residential areas. 7. Prohibited Signs: • Individual lots are not permitted low profile ground business sign. • Pylon signs are prohibited. • Back lit awnings are prohibited. • Window Signs are prohibited except for company logo/symbol and not the name. Such logo shall not exceed 10% of a window area • Menu Signs are prohibited. 8. Sin Design and permit requirements: a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. c. Wall business signs shall comply with the city's sign ordinance for the Neighborhood business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the "street" front and primary parking lot front of each building. j. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the 7 development. High pressure sodium vapor lamps with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. 2. Light fixtures should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). Street light fixtures should accommodate vertical banners for use in identifying the commercial area. The fixtures shall conform with (Figure 36 — Chanhassen Lighting Unit Design). All light fixtures shall be shielded. CmtrJ Pvt Serie Per t2 Pi til IO ixl a.. r Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 candle at the project perimeter Property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 4. lighting for parking areas shall minimize the use of lights on pole standards in the parking area. Rather, emphasis should be placed on building lights and poles located in close proximity to buildings. k. Non Residential Parking 1. Parking shall be provided based on the shared use of parking areas whenever possible. Cross access easements and the joint use of parking facilities shall be protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. 2. The development shall be treated as an integrated shopping center and provide a minimum of one space per 200 square feet -of commercial/retail area. The officelpersonal service component shall be treated as an integrated office buiioing and provide 4.5 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 49,999 square feet, four per thousand square feet for the second 50,000 square feet, and 3.5 per thousand square feet thereafter. 1. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2004. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, Clerk/Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Summary Ordinance published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 15a', 2004) 0 Sand Companies Land Use Detail Map E j J TOWNHOUSES , APTS. r TOWNHOUSES i S" I t QED_ F SOUTHWEST METRO COMMERCIAL �, TRANSIT APTS. U. '! COMMERCIAL WETLAND OFFICE LL m 0 RESIDENTIAL 50' BUFFER - --- - 50' BUFFER J jl CIfYOF Date: December 8, 2004 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department Subject: Sand Companies Concept development. Approximately realigned Hwy 101. Planning Case: 05-01 By: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Planned Unit Development for commercial, office and multifamily 24 acres, located at the northwest comer of Lyman Boulevard and the The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on December 2, 2004. The 60 -day review period ends January 31, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on January 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than December 22, 2004. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official L Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife a. Engineer b. Environmental Services C. 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or SprintiUnited) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 13. Other - 14. Other 7. Carver County /Y / Z & Dc- v'4 PLEASE PRINT Planning Case No. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name and Address: Sand Properties, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue, PO Box 727 Waite Park, Minnesota 56387-0727 Contact: Jim Sand Phone: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320) 202-3139 Email: JWSand@SandCompanies.com Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit ✓ Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review* Subdivision* Owner Name Same as Applica Contact: Phone: Fax: Email: Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign** - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost*** - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. ' Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8'/a" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tin formal. Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME: Chanhassen Gateway North -Residential LOCATION: NW Quadrant of new Highways 101 & 212 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Survey - Parcels #1, #5 & #6 TOTAL ACREAGE: 6.2582 WETLANDS PRESENT: YES ✓ NO PRESENT ZONING: Mixed Use REQUESTED ZONING: Mixed Use PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Vacant REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Multifamily REASON FOR REQUEST: Approvals of the planned unit development for the apartment and townhome projects. This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Signature of Fee Owner May 6, 2005 Date May 6, 2005 Date GiplanVorms\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/05 MIN I CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 Planning Case No. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name and Address: Sand Properties, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue, PO Box 727 Waite Park, Minnesota 56357-0727 Contact: Jim Sand Phone: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320) 202-3139 Email: JWSand@SandCompanies.com Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development' Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review' Subdivision' Same as Contact: Email: 5=0 Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign" - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost"' - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. " Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME: Chanhassen Gateway North - Residential LOCATION: NW Quadrant of new Highways 101 & 212 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Survey - Parcels #1, #5 & #6 TOTAL ACREAGE: 6.2582 WETLANDS PRESENT: YES ✓ NO PRESENT ZONING: Mixed Use REQUESTED ZONING: Mixed Use PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Vacant REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Multifamily REASON FOR REQUEST: Approvals of the planned unit development for the apartment and townhome projects. This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Signature of Fee Owner May 6, 2005 Date May 6, 2005 Date G:tplanWorms\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4105 A City Council Meeting — January 24, 2005 • REQUEST FOR CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL, COMPAIES. INC.. PLANNING CASE NO. 05-01. Public Present: Name Address Jamie Thelen 366 South Tenth Avenue, Waite Park, MN Jim Sand 366 South Tenth Avenue, Waite Park, MN Richard Hennings 366 South Tenth Avenue, Waite Park, MN Kate Aanenson: Thank you. The Sand Company is requesting rezoning of approximately 24 acres. The subject site is, this is the new 212 interchange. This would be Lyman. Excuse me, Lyman and the new 101. This is existing 101. Again 24 acres. Obviously this site is tied into the relocation and the redevelopment of the 212. There's existing wetlands in the easterly comer and 101 will have to be vacated at this point here. As worded in your packet, kind of an overview. We're tying this PUD, as you recall last year we worked on the Southwest Transit PUD and I included in your packet. This is a concept and again the concept, state law says that the zoning and the land use designation need to be consistent. This is guided as a mixed use. These are the only two areas in town that we have that mixed use which could be neighborhood business or high density. Multi -family. The applicant has chosen to come in with the mixed so while it is guided residential single, excuse me. Zoned residential single family it is guided for the mixed use, and that's what the applicant has chosen to do. Again they're coming forward with the PUD concept. The concept again, while it has no legal standing, the intent is to give some clear direction so you notice the staff report kind of has a lot of bullet points. It's really to flush out the issues as this evolves because as I'll explain to you in a minute, we're negotiating still with MnDot and the watershed district on some issues. But with the PUD, the nice thing about that is we'll get the design standards in place, so everybody understands that. The PUD also has a little bit more stringent buffer requirements. There is kind of a built in buffer with 212 but will also has additional buffering when we have a transition between a higher density land use and a lower density. Also with a PUD, we're working with the neighboring properties which is sensitive to the residential where we've got the low scale office building on the comer, and providing those commercial sites. I'll go through their specific proposal. You have this in black and white in your site plan so it's a little bit, I think a little bit easier to read on this. Again this is the Southwest Metro park and ride and the, some office retail with multi -family on the comer. So this is the subject site. When we looked at the approval of the 212, there was a requirement that this side of the property, a through street had to be connected. There will be signalization at this intersection so this street, while it's rather circuitous on this map, you can see it on your's, that that street has to go through. That was a condition of MnDot, so they are providing that. We need to work out kind of those issues. Again as I indicated, as part of the PUD we'll be doing office on this corner, one story. I think the residents are pleased with that. Getting architectural standards, providing a good buffer. It's not our intent to put fast food in here, although there will be some other retail. Again anticipating that this location probably an 13 SCANNED 0 0 City Council Meeting — January 24, 2005 appropriate site for a gas station where that's furthest removed from the residential, based on the 212 interchange. Again there will be an apartment building on this side and some strip retail on that piece. Again that piece has the biggest amount of buffer, again trying to provide Lyman, there's some residential because of the configuration of the major roads. On the north side it's all residential. This west piece of the original 24 acres. The sticky part gets in where we talk about Lake Lucy Drive. While this photo is overlaid on top of, there's a median that runs through this so the access to that is a little bit tougher. We're working, the City Engineer, Paul Oehme and myself have met with Jon Chiglo trying to work through some of those issues. How to provide good access. If you look at Mr. Klingelhutz' property, you have a private drive going through to that property. It's not the best situation there. Again this part of 101 will be vacated. I showed that on my original. Be a berm put in a place there. That provides a good transition between that and existing homes in Chan Hills. But trying to resolve what's the best access, because we don't want people going around the median. Taking U turns. Trying to work those issues out so between now and when they come back for preliminary we're pursuing those. I know when the 101 relocation and this interchange came up at the 212 hearing there was some concern about cut through traffic. Again we're trying to work through providing those transitions. There is existing traffic counts and one of the things that we're working on is trying to make it not convenient for this cut through traffic. Obviously this wouldn't be using that but as we talk about the relocation of 101, one of the things we talked about is actually moving 101 and if we can work through that. There is an existing telecommunication building right there that makes it a little bit more difficult, but maybe moving 101. That provides a berm. Some transition. Screening on the backs of those. Backing the townhouses up onto those lots, so we're still working through that. That's a little bit fluid still on that side and the applicant's aware of that. Again, the subject property could go up to 8 to 16 units an acre. As proposed on here it's only 12 units an acre. Again this is all conceptual at this point. We haven't looked at total impervious surface. Again the goal under the PUD is just kind of flush some things out as far as the uses that we're looking at. The staff feels comfortable with that. Again with the apartments, probably 3 stories in height. Again the way they're located in the site itself, the orientation I think it works best for the least amount of impact for visibility and access. So we did point out, the issues that they need to resolve, kind of department or by issue. One of the things that we are working with, the watershed district. If you saw that they put out a couple of projects to Riley -Purgatory. They were one of the projects they're going to improve Lake Riley is that ponding right there. We have a trail that runs along that side but we're going to make sure that improving that pond doesn't force us to build a big retaining wall to get that trail in so we're working with the watershed and the applicants have met with them too. To make sure that we can blend the grades on that. So the good thing about this coming forward at this time is that we can kind of all be working together as 101 and 212 advances. So with that, oh one other thing. We did mention in here too about, you're looking at the apartments. You know right now we believe that market is a little bit softer but looking at kind of where we are, some types of housing that we maybe needed because we are in close proximity to a transit facility, whether that be senior or they've looked at even some senior coop or some other type of facility that, or type of housing product that we may not have a market nitch, so with that, we're asking that the City Council approve the conceptual PUD. Again kind of with the marching orders outlined in the staff report and with that I'd be happy to answer any questions that you have. c _ 14 0 0 City Council Meeting — January 24, 2005 Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for staff. Not at this time? Okay. Is the applicant here? If they'd like to address the council on any matter. No? Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Send the check to Kate. Mayor Furlong: Are there any questions for them? I've got one. As you look through the proposed requirements of the PUD, is there anything that you see that based upon what you're planning to do here, the types of businesses that might become issues, whether they're going to be coming back looking for changes that you can anticipate now? We seem to get a lot of those for signage and other types of needs. Is there anything that you feel uncomfortable with as this is proposed? No? Okay. Ahight. Richard Hennings: I'm Richard Hennings. Architect with Sand Companies, and as Kate mentioned we're concerned about the access at Lake Susan Drive and what the highway department is potentially saying. In their written report that they sent out 10 days ago, maybe a little bit more than that, they actually talked about no access within 660 feet of the intersection. Our property's not that long and so there would be, if that was a true statement and if they thought it out, which I hope is not the case, there would be no access allowed on Lake Susan Drive to our property at all. And I guess our response to them will be, we've got to work something else here or you need to buy the property because we can't, you know you can't develop property that you don't have access to. Would have no access on any of the four sides if that were the case, so I think perhaps that that was maybe an over statement. I'm hoping that we'll get that worked out with them. That's kind of our big concern that we have right now. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Well that's an issue, and you said Kate that. Kate Aanenson: Yep. Yes, and Paul's aware of it too so we're... Mayor Furlong: We're pretty fluid there. We're working on that so. Okay. Very good. I'm sorry, Councilman Labatt. Councilman Labatt: Kate one quick question. On the, I'll call parcel probably 3. With the apartments. It's going to have the over story or over parking, the parking garage below the 3 levels. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Labatt: On the plan here it looks like there's only one entrance in and out. What's our guidelines for requiring that second entrance in or out? Kate Aanenson: We have existing apartments that have the one way in, one way out. Up on Lake Susan. Those are one way in, and actually we built the building there for the neighbors so there was a break in above grade but there's a long connected under ground. Richard Hennings: Are you talking about one way in and out of the parking lot? 15 0 0 City Council Meeting —January 24, 2005 Councilman Labatt: The parking ramp. Mayor Furlong: If you can get towards a microphone too. Kate Aanenson: Yes. So both of those meet the current, yeah. Yep. Councilman Labatt: Okay, and then that. Kate Aanenson: This was ... one way. Councilman Labatt: The road through that property, is that a public street then? Is that what? Kate Aanenson: Yes. That was a requirement of MnDot when we approved the 212. Obviously there's some design issues. Some of the neighbors had concern about cut through traffic. Obviously if you have some of this cut through, it takes some of the pressure off this intersection which we know will have some, so that's a good thing. But we also didn't want to do it to the detriment of people trying to do business in here so that was one of the things that we've agreed that we need to kind of work through those issues where we use traffic calming. That it is, can be used to cut through but not at the detriment of the existing or proposed businesses, so. Councilman Labatt: Okay. Kate Aanenson: But these two touchdown points are fixed Todd Gerhardt: And that's because if you have a full intersection you have to connect two state aid road sections to that. And that would be 101 and Lyman. Mayor Furlong: Kate, maybe a follow-up question with regards to signage. You mentioned a possible gas station or other types of commercial buildings in that south of 212. Even with the buffers there, what sort of visual protection will there be to the residents over in Chanhassen Hills there? I mean they're going through a lot of changes as it is. And gas station lights tend to be a little more brighter in the evening. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I think most of the commercial is going to be on this side. South of Chan Hills. I think the biggest concern we heard from was the neighbors was, they did hold a neighborhood meeting and the Planning Commission as I mentioned did recommend 5-0, but these neighbors were also concerned about. Mayor Furlong: Sure. Kate Aanenson: So you know obviously there will be some wall signs. We did talk about lighting, but they will have some monument signs. No pylons. We'll recommend the monument sign and identifying the center and once you get in, obviously the gas station is the one, which we think makes sense. With the level of activity by pushing that one up where it's bordered by 101 and new 212. Would have the least amount of light visual impact, and we did want the drive 16 City Council Meeting — January 24, 2005 • through the way we have the speaker and that's something we'll have to work with on that too. You hear the squawking. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And you know you mentioned Springfield neighborhood, and I'm glad you did because they're right down there and obviously they worked very well with the transit, Southwest Metro Transit and that park and ride and I'm glad to hear that you're meeting with the neighbors, which was evident with the lack of volume at the public hearing. At the Planning Commission and the positive so continue to do that if you would because we're, you're inbetween a couple neighborhoods here that used to look out over farm fields and they're going to see a lot of changes as I said, in the next few years. So everything we can do to mitigate the problems ahead of time would be appreciated. Thank you. Any other questions? Comments. I'll bring it back to council for discussion at this point then. Pros? Cons? Councilman Peterson: It certainly seems appropriate for surrounding Southwest Metro Transit, getting some services to that area. It doesn't have any now. From a concept standpoint I certainly think, I can't add any positive critiques to it. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Other comments? Councilwoman Tjomhom: I'm glad it's a PUD. I guess I'd have to say for one thing, I'm hoping that we'll have some quality townhouses and quality apartments that will be built that we can all be proud of. And hoping also that we can maybe have a little mixed use with potential for maybe elderly housing or other housing alternatives because it is next to the transportation hub, as you would have it in Chanhassen so I think it's a good plan. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilman Lundquist. Councilman Lundquist: Agree with the comments. The one, the only thing that really concerns me now is the townhouse, the apartment complex that would be right along Lake Susan Drive as we get into the Lake Susan Hills neighborhood. We continually hear about issues of traffic, cut through and different things going like that and to add that volume of housing right there would be, it's not a big enough concern for me now to say no but I think that will definitely be an issue going forward and the big question that I don't know the answer to is, is it better to have apartments and townhouses there or a commercial something. I don't know which drives, maybe commercial drives more traffic which could be worst but certainly something that if we haven't heard from the residents of Lake Susan Hills, I'm sure that we will so, and again I think it's a great place for these types of things to be near the Southwest and near the highway so let's just make sure that we do it right. But I think it's a good proposal. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilman Labatt. Councilman Labatt: Well I wouldn't disagree with anybody's comments here. I think, you know there's a lot of points to this potential development here that would benefit a large majority of Chanhassen. But that northern portion, we'll call it parcel 1 and 5. I think you know, they have an issue there. If MnDot's not going to give them access, off of Lake Susan Drive, so maybe we can just direct staff to strongly work with MnDot to figure something out there with 03""A52 17 0 0 City Council Meeting — January 24, 2005 MnDot to allow that to working, but with this being just conceptual, you know that gives staff the time and the energy and resources to work with the developer on it. It comes back to us for preliminary and I do like it. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. I think comments were well made. Overall I think it's a good concept. It's nice to see the variety in a mixed use development like this. The access up along Lake Susan Drive is going to be an issue as Councilman Labatt said, not just for this property owner but for the property owner to the north as well, and I know staff is aware of that. The owner there spoke at the public hearing and that issue has to be taken care of. Again, I think it's going to add some services. Some business neighborhood services to this part of town. I think as Councilwoman Tjornhom said, you know as a PUD we get a chance to really make sure it gets done right and I think that's what everybody would be looking for here so this really adds to the quality of our city which I think it has a great potential to do that and there's a lot of work to do but I'm in favor of, from a concept standpoint, of moving forward. That might mean that some things get moved around if Councilman Lundquist's comment about traffic with apartments up there is bad, then we need to do some shifting and such to make things work but ultimately it's got to work for this property owner as well as neighboring property owners as well. And I'm confident that we'll be able to get that done, so I would support it from a concept standpoint. Any other comments? If not, is there a motion? Councilman Lundquist: I'd move that the City Council approve the concept PUD with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Second. Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion on the motion? Hearing none we'll proceed with the vote. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approve the concept PUD, Planning Case 05-01 with the recommendations outlined in the staff report. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL WITH VARIANCES FOR THE PLANNING CASE 05-03. Public Present: Name Address Neil Tessler CEI Engineering 0 of ! 1 -N. W. Corner of Sec. 24 r / 90k / 902/ 0° \ I to 1 0 /906- / Intp4ection of the SVine__, the N. 660 feet o/ the C=9185 1/2 of the N.W. 1/4 \ L=92. 14 I n 1} I� EoAter%y Right -6f -Way / \ R-330.00", ( Lire df No. 101 c. N56' 16 •5$,"Le r N8,919 -537W 43786 55" \\ ro H i I / \ ,/_'/ \ ---MH-Sanitary `�---1J- dge/ of l �`• . S �{ine o/ Nie N. 660 \ \ Rim=897.50 W. Line of Sec. 24-- - - -( I I rov�l / Keen of the W. 142 0! - -fir_ ._.� Inv.=885.30 I 1 1 11 I the N.W 1/4 / __ In I I I PARbEL {J / I t /• -mt,�+r ion o/ the Southerly I 1 I �I I I 1 � reo= 1.49 Arces l / /` \ , , I I 1 Line of Future �,1 • 1 I Lfiike 96son Drive L I 1 �, a° l - � 12,�d1E44 Cl to m191'8;o o �'"/ D 3 10-ap61 I I I Ls110'.��66� I N I I 1 (.r2 I AI R'N69 A8 1�n6 q1h C %�s I I 3 \ C BRGs41.36 ��1.- \ �Southe�y Right-Of-Way\Li e\ \\ \ % ' / 7 \\.. - /4 / / / \ 1 \ \ ESI a\df. \ N8933 /6� i' 'r� % ✓ / I I I \ Flh \ Catch 4 46,90 North Right -O/ -Way Lau ole Rim=912.12.49 �---%`• / � � � - - -40>� / \> ( i { � \ \ Future Lake Susan Drive,=909.29 •\Inv. J_ `•�.�-� J fig - -MH-Sonifory LAKE SUSAN *4 Rim=908.97 Catch Bosin-- f Y �9/p 1.36 o5 \Z2 Inv=886.24 Rim=912.62 e �� hl , i � 8R0O5;30•�gd // // // ,' b i-Ndpip/Right-bf-1% Line Inv.=909.20 �, ri , i / \ 139-7!5 £x. Curb d Gutter\ ',� i i/ n \''�� Field 90 / / / •'V - _, ,_ - / i�l -'� Catch Bosfn _ -MH-Sanitary / / �� e / / .`" / / Field Easterly Line of CHANHASSEN_-_, `� f f ( Rim- 11.60 Rim =910.88 HILLS 3RD ADDITION -�\ '`•1 i V Inv. 4.210 Inv.=886.50 Fence is 1.41 West ` ` //PARCEL 1 0 / / of Property Line '"� \: `�, I ( / \ / 9ro/ CHA NHA SSEN HILLS PARCEL 2 I / `Areo s o,3 Arces / / / Areo= 9098.58 S F_ ll / 1 - / ^ I I 1 \ \ -----E/!ge of / , 3RD ADDITION etanng� I `IIi k'• field // // r _-, l + I 1 n \ \ DB `--llnte' lion of the Westerly Fence is 331 west- _ 1,4 ! 't-�lH-Sanitory / / / `� 11:� / Rig -Of-Woy Line of Future of Property Line �bt f I I / Rini =9924 / / / / / / 1 N / / Tr nk Highway No. 101 I I \ 1 1 7n�886.86- / 58911'51'11Ni912332*E/ II I I _ G� 31.87 _,_� / �/ / I / \ � Ede o/ / Certificate &Topographic Survey O i • \ - _ ,i Fipld / PARCEL 1: --__Coach Basin F.e(d V96' �\ i That port o/ the West Holl of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24 and that port of the I Rim.907.74 1'�. 9 / Easterly Line of CHANHASSE ,6i I 0 - / I 1 ,0 / ` Mv. 9Q276 03.72 _ , East Half o1 the Northeast Ouorter of Section 23 all in Township 116 North, Range 23 HILLS 3RD ADD/TION WoI �9 I ;I \ s\o - D$ob•4 6;•063 West, Carver County, Minnesota described as follows: %10 A95 / Commencing at the Northwest Corner of said Section 24, also being the Northeast Corner Fence is 5.11 West ------ ��yy \ \ I 0 of said Section 2J; thence along the West line of said Section 24, South 00 degrees 01 of Property Line\ \ , Benchmark: minutes 23 seconds West, o distance of 1495.18 Leet to the North right o/ way line o/ the T. N. H. future location of Trunk Highway No. 212, being also the Point of Beginning of the land 2479- A �Naf� Right �Ofl Wo)♦ L• a o/ Elev.=906.529) herein described; thence Northeasterly along said right o/ way line the following three (3) Edge o/ - _ I' Future /Trulik I w9y o. 212 courses: thence along a curve, concave to the Southeast, whose elements are: orc length Wafer -/ ~`� _ +++�---1444ccc of 493.36 feet, radius o/ 4669.60 feet, central ongle of 06 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds \ € / `IH Sarttor and o chord that bears North 60 degrees 42 minutes 09 seconds East, o distance of 493.13 Woterr _ / Rim= 8 feet; thence North 19 degrees 12 minutes 32 seconds East, a distance of 49.59 feet; --- Intersection of the Northerly _ V. 746 thence North 71 degrees 27 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance o/ 8779 feet to the Right-Of-Woy Line o/ Future i t r intersection with the Westerly right of way line o/ the future location of Trunk Highway Trunk Highway No. 212 J' i nl I No. 101; thence Northerly along said Westerly right o/ way line, the to/lowing two (2) n1\ 24" RCP f , l-=C3t�h Basin - --898- - courses: thence North 09 degrees 52 minutes 53 seconds East, o distance of 25761 leek W. Inv=899.44 r I Rfm-QQ0273 thence North 00 degrees 01 minutes 21 seconds West, a distance of 229.56 feet to the E. Inv=897.31 i 1�I\ /\=89113 - - _ r ' - - - - - 900, - intersection with the Southerly right o1 way line of the future location of Lake Susan Ede o/ a ! - - - - - go.?- - Drive; thence Southwesterly along said Southerly right o/ way line, the following Jour (4) Gravel �° / n 1j" 1�.-Edge of-- i - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ \ courses: thence along o curve, concave to the South, whose elements ore: arc length -904-- \ 756.46 feet, radius o/ 270.00 feet, central angle of 33 degrees 12 minutes 07 seconds and a chord that bears South 64 degrees 53 minutes 01 seconds West, a distance of 154.28 ,r= n n A - - - - - - _Fje/d / i/ l -' - �� - ` 906- \ \ \ / feel; thence South 48 degrees 16 minutes 58 seconds West, a distance o/ 225.39 feet; X90 thence along o curve, concave to the North, whose elements are: orc length o/ 139.68 pp n �"'15� - _ / - - - - - - 3 $ B\ \ \ / feet, radius of 330.00 feet, central angle o/ 41 degrees 36 minutes 48 seconds o chord that bears South 69 degrees 05 minutes 22 seconds West, o distance of 234.44 feet; thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 45 seconds West, a distance o/ 46.99 feet to said Westerly I0 \ J line of Section 24, being also the centerline of the existing right of way for Trunk ers tion of the Westerly Highway No. 101 and also on Easterly line of the plot of CHANHASSEN HILLS 3RD 9yOt / / - -.�6 / - - Right-OftWay Line o/ Future denotes Coble TV Accesses Hole ` . \ t / / _ - \ �'(unk\(-lighi��No. 101 ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota; thence along said Westerly line of Section 24, denotes Coble TV , o i 1 n!' / / / - - / \ \ s South 00 degrees 01 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 269.64 feet; thence South 89 o - -g Right-O�flay Cine \ \ �,, e4 r � / distance / i f n Easterly lin / i O denotes Telephone Box o� I i uJ / / / _ _ - - degrees 41 minutes 51 seconds West, o dsto ce o 3 .87 eel too Eoste y e o said pd denotes Gote Valve ��r�yi� I f n C / / / - - - _ - 119 IN\ \ \ CHANHASSEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION; thence along said Easterly line, South 00 �} denotes Fire Hydrant 1 \ n Q i /I / / „1�-Sanitory _. - \ ?�� - \ \ `9y4\ degrees 11 minutes 39 seconds East, o distance of 259.05 feet to the intersection with said ` I i denotes Fire (S/SJ Rim=9156- - 9� - - _ _ _ _ \ \ \ Northerly right of way line of the future location o/ Trunk Highway No. 212, thence _X_X Hydront \ n - I / Inv.=889.66�9 along said Northerly right of way line, North 47 degrees 18 minutes 09 seconds East, o i .-. denotes Sanitary Sewer distance of 4230 feet to the Point of Beginning. .. _ denotes Overhead Electric \ I / q p• F: ( l�-'-�Inlersectron o/ the South \ \ \ \ \ - / Right-Of-Woy/Line of Future \ ) \ \ y I• ( 1 I Trunk Hlghwoyt No. 212 Containing 229,622 sq. /f. or 5.2714 acres o/ loud. denotes Concrete / \ n � �9 9�\ \ - / / / 1 / 55{ 2 2 J \/ PARCEL 2 \\ , / 20/ �\ All that part o/ existing Trunk Highway No. 101 dedicated to the public in /l 11 // / - -9P8- - \ \ \ \\ ( / i9 \ CHANHASSEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, a plot on file and o/ record in the of/ice o/ the 1 \ / County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota and described as 'T.H. No. 101" in sold Plot: I 1 \\ I \ / I ' rEj / 1 / / I F , ` \ I I 1 \ \ q Id i\ ' Containing 9,102 sq. ft. or 0.2089 acres of land. PARCELI3 \5.47\ \ PARCEL 3: Area= Ai-ces - ----Edge of, l I ( { \ - - I - - �. h\ \ \ // I6� Field `\.( ( l III 11• I �Edgq� of \ // / \ \ That port of the Southwest Ouorter of the Northwest Ouorter of Section 24, Township /, / I I I ( Ii I I 1 Gravh1 \ ` / , u$ \ \ , 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, described as follows: / / •(5-Ssufberly'l?fght-Of-Way II nI f I �\ Field /Westerly Right-Of-Woy Line Commencing of the Southwest corner o1 said Southwest Ouarter, being also the West Field I I I I I a An II I I / .926. 1 1 Ouorfer Corner of said Section 23; thence along the West line of said Southwest Ouorter, / n / / In North DO degrees Of minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 88.01 feel to the intersection E. (Lf o/ the M.E. P/4-!nl I I I o/ 2t3 / / o with the Northerly right o/ way line o/ the future location o/ Lyman Boulevard, the Point of Beginning of the tract o/ land herein described; thence continuing along sold West the N.W. 1/4- = \ �y(a , 1 ( / line, North 00 degrees 01 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 604.46 feet to the : / j n 10 �f 2 1 / \\ l , / intersection with the South right o/ way line the future location of Trunk Highway No. PA CEL �' / % / / [ ( / I 1 ^ \\ \ / / 212,• thence along said South right of way line the following three (3) courses; thence i `° ( I 18 IiCP\ South 79 degrees 56 minutes 11 seconds East, a distance of 33.52 feet; thence North 59 \ \ l age of \Areo=J 9.25 Atce ; I I IN. In .=919.39 \ 9ti \ / \ \ \ ( I I I , , \ degrees 32 minutes 26 seconds East, o distance o1 485.53 feet; thence South 53 degrees \ i / Field / I \ \S In ,=919.64 I \\ , I i / / / � i � i • \ 19 minutes 20 seconds Eosf, o distance o/ 12271 feet to the intersection with the � p / / \ l / _ / Westerly right of way line of the future location of Trunk Highway No. 101; thence along N 1 / Field l l / �, ' I/ - �-MH-Sanitarf• ` a' '� ` ( E r I / / / 20" i { / , 1Pim=922,69 Northerly Right -Of -Way- / said Westerly right of way line, South 00 degrees Of minutes 23 seconds East, a distance \ \ \\ \ \ \ "� ` \/9 \ In 72 ) / \\ �\ / of 776.19 feet to said Northerly right of way line of the future location of Lyman \ \ \ \ \ \ Northerly !fight-Of-Woy Line ( ( i I I l \ ` Boulevard; thence along said Northerly right of way line. North 89 degrees 30 minutes 16 \ I I Int gecfion of the Northerly RightLOf-Way Line of Future 1 \ / /Field seconds West, o distance o/ 550.03 feet to the Point of Beginning. Intersection of ithe Southerly1 \ \ \ \ l Edge of----' \ \ r "�r•/ Field / / I I \ I ymon Boulevard _-MH-Sonifory Right-Ol-Woy Llae of Future / _ \ \ \ \ / / I 1 Q \ Rim=92277 I Edge of - t 91 Containing 381,842 sq. It. or 87659 acres of land Trunk Highway No�2t2- I I \ 1 n %�' %��. 1 �\ Catch Basin \ Inv. =905.96 Field ! Rim=924.59 i \ \ 70'54"W 777.79 0 r _ A)i-Sonitary lnv=921.69 --Catch Basini838"5003 - - - - - - - - Rin�_924.98 i Rim=925.24 1.916 � / \ � � - _ \ ` - - - -moo I \ ) / ' t lnv.=97,.48 % Inv =921.44 ----- /g16 --=_=ac -- er- `-was=-_ x_- , moi=Cert/ / -- ry� n `�Bitu-- -- minocsP - _� - ------ v -I 2 • % _ _ -1 - - - "r - - _ --74 _ LY_MA_N -� -- - \- - - ---E o/ Bituminous- � - ------------'�------------------ __--_�__ __ _ -------= -- Edge of Bituminous �\ •, -a Ex. Curb &� Gutter ---- _ i r� - - '�� \ ---------------------------- _ L- -----k - - - - ti"c-' ^3 - Basin Ed of- f` / - - - - _ j i C,ro n -�I C�1 �_-Edge o/ %\„_.,---'SW. Corner of the S.W. 1/4 0l \-�j£dge of T.N.H. \ \\\�j .-Catch Basin ---R'm Catch925.26 Cave! " Sec. 24, T. 116, R. 23, Carver Gravel Elev.=926.30 Rim=924.66 County (N.G.V.D. 1929) �� Inv.=922.36 Inv=922.16 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 00HASSEN PLANNING DEPT PARCEL 4: That port of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Ouorler of Section 23, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Southeast Ouorter, being also the West Ouorter Corner of sold Section 24, thence along the East line of said Southeast Ouarter, North 00 degrees 01 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 88.01 feet to the intersection with the Northerly right of way line of the future location of Lyman Boulevord, the Point of Beginning of the tract of land herein described, • thence along said Northerly right of way line, North 89 degrees 10 minutes 34 seconds West, o distance of 77779 feet to the intersection with the Southerly right of way line of the future location of Trunk Highway No. 212, thence along sold Southerly right of way line the following two (2) courses; thence North 51 degrees 10 minutes 25 seconds East, o distance of 955.61 feet; thence South 79 degrees 56 minutes 11 seconds East, a distance of 33.52 feet to said East line of Section 23,• thence along said East line, South 00 degrees 01 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 604.46 feet to said Northerly right of way line of the future location of Lyman Boulevard, the Point of Beginning. Containing 247,111 sq. ft. or 5.6729 acres of land. PARCEL 5: That part of the West hall of the Northwest Ouorter of Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest Corner of said Section 24; thence along the West line of sold Section 24, South 00 degrees Ol minutes 23 seconds East, o distance of 72722 feet to the Point of Beginning of the land herein described; thence continuing along said West line, South 00 degrees Of minutes 23 seconds East, o distance of 20789 feet to the North right o/ way line of the future location of Lake Susan Drive; thence along said North right of way line, the following four (4) courses: thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of 46.90 feet; thence along a curve concave to the northwest, whose elements are., arc length of 196.10 feet, radius of 270.00 feet, central angle of 41 degrees 36 minutes 48 seconds and a chord that bears North 69 degrees 05 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 191.82 feet; thence North 48 degrees 16 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 225.39 feet; thence along a curve, concave to the Southeast, whose elements ore. arc length of 92.14 feet, radius of 330.00 feet, centro/ angle o1 15 degrees 59 minutes 55 seconds and o chord that bears North 56 degrees 16 minutes 55 seconds East, a distance of 91.85 feel to the intersection with the South line of the North 660 feet of said West half of the Northwest Ouorter thence along said South line, North 89 degrees 19 minutes 33 seconds West, a distance of 43786 feet to the Easterly right of way line of Highway No. 101, being also the most Northeasterly corner of a certain tract of land deeded to Bell Telephone and described in Document No. 90735; thence Southeasterly, Southwesterly and Northeasterly along the lines of said certain tract of land deeded to Bell Telephone, the following three (3) courses. thence South 26 degrees 47 minutes 09 seconds East, o distance of 241.31 feet; thence along o curve, concave to the Northwest, whose elements are., orc length 85.00 feet; radius of 506.30 feet; central ongle o1 09 degrees 37 minutes 07 seconds and a chord that bears South 66 degrees 55 minutes 58 seconds West, o distance of 84.90 feet; thence North 19 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West, o distance of 192.70 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 64,761 sq. ft. or 1.4867 acres of land. oc"MrO 00 C 00 To LC 2 O • L « I Z O 7 n J a O O � � O Zn C u1 O. d N d N C O ITm m!a �Z'm eW10 wM tMp 3 O to a) O � r: 'O U) ..1 G W d e C W N 00 C To LC 2 O v • L « q t 7 n J N O � � O Zn C u1 O. d N d « n 3 v � M 0 a LLI m U V L n' U W o N G O � O w U �YM 3 Ono OC i v J ' N i ' � M r oO .Q � L N C V) Z ~ V o Z o O v N V) ti 41 N O p U p O L � Ln QL O (0 N ,c (j o o d 0 7 N o k"g o C I_ nu 3 U) O O� C -C C O O aN *C: :_ O O E as D O CC - O O_0 O N _ (D an a- Encn N rn o N N E? N O O O �Oa1 C a a 0 • O�a CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 7, 2005 Acting Chairman McDonald called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.. MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerry McDonald, Deborah Zorn, Kurt Papke, Dan Keefe, Mark Undestad, and Debbie Larson MEMBERS ABSENT: Uli Sacchet STAFF PRESENT: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; and Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director PUBLIC PRESENT FOR ALL ITEMS: Debbie Lloyd Janet Paulsen 7302 Laredo Drive 7305 Laredo Drive PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY TO PLANNED Public Present: Name Address Mary Lou & Tom Whaley 851 Lyman Boulevard Cindy Miller & David Delforge 891 Lyman Boulevard Al Klingelhutz 8600 Great Plains Boulevard Richard S. Hennings 366 South Tenth Avenue, Waite Park, MN Sharmeen Al-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Papke: Question on that sidewalk, if I may. When you were tracing that with your finger you only traced a path on the east side of 101. Are there sidewalks on both side of 101 there? Al -Jaffa No. They will be along the east side of 101. Papke: So residents of that northern residential will have to cross over twice in order to get down to that little. What's the constraint there? Why wouldn't we put a sidewalk on the wesi side of 101? Al -Jaffa Paul, can you help me out here. Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 Oehme: Thank you Chairman, Planning Commission members. The issue I think with 101 was when we were going through the design, we had definitely. McDonald: Excuse me, before you start. Would you identify yourself. Oehme: Sure, I'm sorry. I'm Paul Oehme. I'm the City Engineer/Public Works Director. Going through the 212 design and when this, when the park and rec department looked at trail connections and access to future sites, the trail along 101 did, you know there was, as I recall several discussions on the necessity for the trails on both sides of the bridge at 101 but just due to the cost prohibitive nature of installing that trail on both sides, they felt that access is still being provided across 101 to the future developments and to the future park and ride on the east side of 101. So there is continuity in terms of a trail access. You know it's not a perfect design but we're trying to stay within our budget limits. McDonald: I have a question for you along those lines and I know with Highway 5, the pedestrian bridge came in later after everything had been taken care of. Is there a possibility here of a connection with a pedestrian bridge later as funds become available? Oehme: Absolutely. We can talk with MnDot and a lot of cities, if there is a trail connection need, there are grant applications out there through Met Council and other government agencies where we could look at an overpass bridge of 212 sometime in the future. McDonald: Well is that something as part of your planning now that you need to at least put the stake in the ground that we would like to do that so it is in the record as part of your planning as you look and evaluate these sites, is that something you can put in for us? Oehme: Well I can't really comment on that. We'd have to talk to the park and rec department about that issue. That's more their area. But that's something we'll definitely bring up to them. McDonald: Okay. Anything more? Sharmeen Al -Jeff continued with the staff report. McDonald: I'll throw the floor open. Keefe: Yeah, I've got a couple questions. Just from a process standpoint, we're moving forward with the rezoning tonight. And with site plan approval later. Al -Jaffa Correct. Keefe: Later. Why would they not come together, just from a process standpoint? Because one thing I'm having a difficult time with is grappling with well, we're setting up a design standard. They've come forward with kind of a site plan but they haven't really proposed a site plan other than conceptual I guess is kind of where we're at now. And then we're going to sort of go ahead a31u+#Zs Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 and approve mixed use development, which they could presumably go and change. I'm just trying to get a sense for the timing and order and how do we keep control around, yeah. Al -Jaffa Absolutely. Think of it this way. You are telling them what their setbacks are going to be. What the maximum height is going to be. Right now you don't have these standards in place. When they come in trying to design a building, what guidelines do they follow? You are putting all of their guidelines for them. And they will design their buildings accordingly. And that would deal with the architecture. Their signage. Their, basically what you see in a city code, the compliance table that we typically provide you with, this is your compliance table. These are the standards that you are setting for them. Keefe: With what they proposed so far, do they fit within the design standards that we're proposing here? That we would be approving this evening. Al -Jaffa Couple of things we have discussed. We do have a comfort level that they will be able to meet these requirements. There were some things that they thought might be a little strict and we invited them to discuss these with the Planning Commission. This is staff's recommendation and they definitely can, it is their right to present their perspective and their request in front of you. Keefe: What is the general timing for them to come back for site plan approval? Do we have a time line or a general ... in regards to that? A] -Jaffa No we don't. However, once the highway is complete, you know that. They won't sit on it too long. Keefe: Right. It's, do you have a comfort level that this is going to be generally where they're going to end up or do you have? Al -Jaffa Yes. Keefe: Because there's really nothing other than the design standard that we'll approve tonight to really hold them to it but. Al -Jaffa Exactly. Keefe: Yep, okay. That's all. Papke: I've got a couple questions. In the letter from the Chamber there was a note about the intent of it's permission of the use shopping center. I couldn't find shopping center in the staff report tonight. Do you happen to know what reference that was to? Al -Jaffa First of all if you will. Papke: I understand what they mean, but it seemed to imply that there was some mention of shopping center in the PUD, and I didn't have an electronic copy so I couldn't search for it Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 electronically or anything, but a brief scan didn't tum it up. I was just curious as to whether you were aware of where that might be present in the proposal. Al -Jaffa There's retail shops. Maybe that's what was, what might be confusing. Papke: Okay. I have a question about, or maybe a request for a clarification of the, an individual user would be limited to 8,000 square feet in the second paragraph of page 3. We had an example a few months ago, well more than a few months ago now. I can't recall how long ago it was. Where Edina Realty, when they did exactly what the Chamber of Commerce was trying to prevent and bugged out of downtown and moved out to Century Boulevard out there by let's say very interesting definition of individual user with 3 different entities. Is there any way we can crispen this up a little bit to make sure that we don't have that occur again or do you feel that this is sufficiently restrictive or? Al -Jaffa I do believe it is restrictive. The business community, and if you read the Chamber's, it's the government action from the Chamber, it basically is not as, they're concerned with commercial types of competition. That's more of a concern for them. Papke: Okay. But you know things moving out of downtown, I mean it's kind of in the same bucket in my mind. You know that's a pretty fine distinction to draw. But I'll let that one go. Al -Jaffa I can definitely add that limitation. Papke: What would it actually, what are you proposing? Al -Jaffa When we say no single user can exceed. No single tenant can occupy more than 8,000 square feet. Papke: No single tenant, not just a user. Okay. I think that might help. Those are the only questions I have, thanks. Larson: Okay, the only question I've got, getting back to, briefly I wanted to touch on the walking access. Based on what I'm seeing here, it looks like most of your residential is on the west side. You've got freeway on ramps and all that stuff on the east side. Is there a reason why the east side was chosen versus the west side? Just curious. Al-Jaff: As far as the sidewalks? Oehme: Again, I think we'd have to talk to the park and rec department because they more or less set the locations for those trail accesses. Larson: The park is on the other side. Oehme: Yeah, I think the park and ride had a big influence on where that trail was going to go in the end, but. 4 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 Larson: You know if I had my child riding their bike, I don't want them to go over, you know what I mean? Oehme: Yep, exactly. Larson: So that's really my main question in this whole deal. That's all. McDonald: No questions? At this point I have no questions either. I'll reserve any of my comments until later. What I'd like to do now is, do we have an applicant at this point to? Why don't you come on up sir and identify yourself and address the council. Richard Hennings: My name is Richard Hennings. I'm an architect with Sand Companies and have done most of the planning for this project so far. I think there are just a couple of issues I'd like to mention. One is the timing of this and it is a little strange and it's at our request that the city planning staff would help us, and that's because for the building on the north site, it's the question marked shaped apartment building, we're making an application to the Minnesota Housing and Finance Authority for a tax credit housing project, and that application has to be in by June 28`s. Then you carry that further and say well why aren't you doing the whole thing? Well we don't have any of the grading information from 312/212 to show what happens around the edge of the site, and so we can't complete your requirements until the final grading on that and so we kind of begged the planning department to get us you know this far. If we forward the application to the tax credit to the Minnesota Housing and Finance, having PUD approval would be sufficient. And so it's kind of an interim step and they're doing it as kind of a favor to us to get it this far. Couple of other issues you asked about the future location for crossing of 212, and I would point out that there's an easement, a utility easement that runs along the current 101 here, existing water and sewer line there and that easement's pretty wide. It's 60 and 70 feet wide and you know, that might be a good future location. Obviously that will be vacant the whole time there so that would be one possibility. And then there was one, a concern ... in the recommendations from planning staff and that's on the height of the apartment buildings, and that's kind of a funny technical issue but we don't have any issue with the 3 story requirement. That's our intention. That's an efficient way to build an apartment building, but your ordinance also has a limitation of 35 feet and it's kind of a funny thing because you also have requirements that we have varied roof lines and pitched roofs and all those kind of things and the way buildings are built nowadays, if you start at grade and you go 8 foot ceilings and 2 foot structure and 8 foot ceiling and 2 foot structure, and 8 foot ceiling, then 1 foot structure on your roof... you're at 29 feet. By limiting to 35 feet you basically push us into a relatively flat roof like a 4:12 pitch, and I really think that's not what you want. It has that strange effect of doing that. In order to put a 5:12 pitch on buildings... building nowadays, you measure to the average height of the roof. Not the top. That requirement would be something like 37-38 feet to get just that kind of pitch, and I just pointed that out to you. I mean we can live with this if we have to, but it would really actually lead to probably better architecture I think if you were to allow a little bit higher there. We don't have choices on the 8 foot ceilings and those kind of things. Those are... by the code. And with that I guess I'd just answer any other questions there might be. Larson: One quick question. Is it a consideration to not do 3 stories? I mean I know you're trying to get the most money out of your deal, you know but. 5 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 Richard Hennings: I guess what I would say, given what we've got invested in land and infrastructure here, we won't be able to make the project work if it's not 3 stories. Larson: Gotch ya. Okay, that's it. Thank you. Undestad: I just had a question on the 3 story with the height issue on there. You know there might be some language in there as far as restraining to the residential units to 3 stories and I don't know if you guys, is there any concern about any office, warehouse or anything else trying to. Richard Hennings: Actually that one is 2 story, the office building. Undestad: I mean I'm sorry, the residential. So you're keeping that at 3 story and... Al -Jaffa If they have to go to a higher roof, then we come before the Planning Commission. Undestad: I haven't seen any, we don't know what your building designs are as to how wide or what your roof lines will be anyways. Richard Hennings: I guess all I'm saying this for is because you have to hear the issue again. We're okay with doing it at that time if that's... McDonald: Okay, I've got a couple questions. I'm not sure if you're far enough along to be able to answer any of this but, give me an idea of what your vision is for these sites. I mean what are we looking at that you could point to within the city that we currently have that might be comparable to what you're planning for this area? Or not even this city you know. One of the other surrounding cities. Is this going to be comparable to a development we're looking at in those areas? Richard Hennings: I guess I'm not prepared to name those. You know the buildings we're talking about, you have you know a good set of design standards in place so we're looking at doing you know high quality buildings. We on the apartment buildings are not only develop them but we continue to own and manage them so we have a vested interest in doing the project right. We understand all of your landscaping standards and your parking standards and all those things and fully intend to meet all of those. I guess we think it will be a high quality project and high quality building. The building that we're talking about on the north site is predominantly 2 and 3 bedroom units. It's aimed at family housing. So there'd be at least 75% of the units are 2 and 3 bedrooms. Relatively smaller number of 1 bedroom units. They're larger you know apartments. They run up to 1,400 square feet per apartment. That kind of building will allow us to get actually about 1.2 cars per apartment in the parking garage because the building's larger, so we'll have nearly half or about exactly half of our parking requirement inside the building. Keeping fewer cars outside. The western part of the site is showing development in townhouse units which would be 2 story, or potentially I suppose split level. 1 and 2 story and this would have 2 stall garages in every townhome. Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 McDonald: Can I ask, what kind of price range are you looking at? Richard Hennings: The townhouse units we would guess are going to have to be priced in the high 200's, the low 300's. Again to justify the cost of the land and development it's going to have to be in that range. Keefe: I've got one more question. It looks like the site plan that you've got here is pretty similar to the one that you brought in before and I just want to ask a similar question I asked Sharmeen, do you anticipate a significant changes beyond here? Richard Hennings: I'm actually hoping not. I'm hoping that my anticipations about the grades and what the highway grades are going to be are reasonable in that we'll be able to•you know, for instance we show entering that apartment building on the south edge because that's the lower corner of the site now. I can only presume that they're not going to change that. One thing I would point out, Paul mentioned to me that this area here, which the MnDot had shown as a pond related to their project, they actually claimed that little piece and as part of the land that they were acquiring, and it seemed strange to us because it was over the top of the sewer and water right-of-way and we couldn't understand how they decided to put a pond there. Paul tells me they've since changed their viewpoint on that which, I don't know if that means they've changed their viewpoint on acquiring the land or not. It's just an easement so it won't be used for anything else anyway. But for instance we then show our pond development as adjacent to that because it makes certain sense. That's the way the site drains. That could be effected by how they do their back slope grading and everything on that, so we're doing a little bit of guessing here. Keefe: Just one other question. The road which cuts through the south side, that one. It looks like it's more defined than what we've seen in previous renditions. Is there? Richard Hennings: It may have for instance some sharper comers and things. We had talked with planning about making sure that we have kind of traffic calming here. That we don't want to provide a faster route between this intersection and this intersection than the State is, so the concept here, and we haven't kind of looked it a great deal but would be to keep the travel right- of-way relatively narrow and to keep the intersection or the comers relatively sharp as ways of keeping the speeds down. The other thing I would say is that the south end, the connection with Lyman is relatively flexible and I think what's actually going to happen is that they're suggesting the intersection get moved somewhat further to the east because of some slope problems back here, and also it makes a certain amount of sense to get the water and sewer right-of-way takes a chink to the east at that point and it may make some sense to move the road right-of-way at least parallel to it, if not partially onto it. And so moving that intersection a little bit further east. We're flexible there and I guess we were waiting for someone to kind of give us a cue on where exactly they want that. This drawing has not been updated. I think they're actually, we might even have a drawing where it's been moved over a little ways but it was just a guess on our part SO. Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 Oehme: I think we've tentatively moved that intersection over approximately 40 feet from it's current location on this drawing. It stages us better for access to the north and future development to the south as well. Keefe: Well and it looks like that might be a ... store or something there. That corner. Would that potentially go, no at the south end. Richard Hennings: No, we're actually seeing these two south ends as office developments. We kind of committed when we talked at neighborhood meetings and stuff about keeping this portion and office because of it facing the residential across the intersection, and so I think that's been our view that it's, you know it may be that drive up office to the insurance agent or a dentist or whatever, but we see, we've seen that as primarily office with the retail and the other two sites SO. McDonald: Anyone else have any questions on the commission? No? Thank you very much then. At this point I would open up the meeting to the floor. Anyone interested in coming up and making a comment, please come up to the mic. State your name and your address and give us your comments. Okay, no one wishes to make a comment then what we will do now, we will go in and, oh I'm sorry. Al Klingelhutz: I'm Al Klingelhutz that abuts the property on the north side of Lake Susan Drive and there's a small sliver of land between our property and Lake Susan Drive and I'm wondering that is going to be used for. That little triangular piece. McDonald: Is it possible for you to point that out on the map there? Does it show on that map? Al Klingelhutz: And what is planned for that piece of land? Is this Lake Susan Drive here? Al-Jaff: This is Lake Susan Drive. Lake Susan Drive is right here. Richard Hennings: The white piece here is the Qwest telephone building. Switching building, and so then there's this other little sliver on the west side of that. Al -Jaffa It's landscaping. Landscaping. Nothing. AI Klingelhutz: That's all landscaping there? Al -Jaffa Yes. Al Klingelhutz: Is there an access to Lake Susan Drive from the property to the north, or must it be on the old 101? Al -Jaffa The intent is to have the access off of 101. Al Klingelhutz: For his piece of property. E:1 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 Al -Jaffa For this piece of property, access will be off of Lake Susan Drive. Al Klingelhutz: What about this one? Al-Jaff: It will be off of the same drive. Al Klingelhutz: Now when I come in to develop the rest of my property to the north of that property, can I get access to Lake Susan Drive or must I come over here? ...about the access and where it should go onto Lake Susan Drive or onto the present 101. It's kind of a sharp grade beyond that triangle piece. Going up like that is going to be kind of hard to build an access to the old 101 at that point. Keefe: I think he's asking a question in terms of access from his parcel to the north, is it going to be the old 101? Oehme: Yeah, right now it is planned for the old 101. The existing 101 or Great Plains Boulevard when we reconstruct the grades and change it slightly, approximately 2 feet by the curb there. Al Klingelhutz: That little triangle piece by the telephone building is going to be. Al -Jaffa Landscaping. Al Klingelhutz: Huh? Al -Jaffa Landscaping. A] Klingelhutz: All landscaping? It's about an acre parcel. Acre and a half parcel at the most. Then where is the big apartment building going? Al -Jaffa Here is one right here. This is future 101. This is existing 101. Al Klingelhutz: That's the old 101 there. Al -Jaffa This is old 101. This is new 101. So right here. Papke: And the bigger one is to the south of 212, isn't it? Al -Jaffa And then there is another one down here. Keefe: So as I recall we were talking about whether there should be access from your parcel to the north there, straight down to Lake Susan Drive. Straight south to Lake Susan Drive, or should it go west to the old 101, right. And that's what we were talking about and what I'm hearing you guys say, it's 101. Oehme: Yeah, that's the intent right now. Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 Keefe: Right, and the concern is the grade. Al Klingelhutz: Well the grade, the last 2/3 of the property up to Lake Susan, up to their property is quite a steep bank. I mean it is steep that you can't use. It'd be kind of tough to put a outlet to my piece of property at that point. Keefe: To the west onto 101 is what you're saying. Oehme: Again, existing 101 will be reconstructed. We're looking at the grades out in that area and we are tentatively lowering the grades right by that north jog there by approximately about 2 feet so we're trying to tie in to the existing grades more than they are right now and when future development is slated for that area, we're going to try to work that area and try to make those grades work in terms of access issues. Keefe: So by approving this tonight and maybe I'm getting directly to your question, by approving this mixed use development tonight, do we preclude any access to Lake Susan Drive from the Klingelhutz property? Al -Jaffa That would be looked into and again, when the site plan is before you as well as the subdivision. Keefe: Okay, so it could potentially come back at a later date. AI -Jaffa It has to come back. Keefe: Well it has to, but I mean that specific question could come back. AI -Jaffa But for now, and based upon studies that we have conducted, we have, we are leaning towards providing access off of old 101. Keefe: Right. So the direction is towards old 101. However it's not set in stone because they have to come back for a site plan review. Al Klingelhutz: Is that little piece going to be landscaped property and will that be city property after the development is approved? McDonald: I'm totally lost I have to tell you. I'm not following all this where we're talking. Is this part of what we're looking at? AI-Jaff: It will belong to the developer. It's intended to belong to the developer. It's intended to be landscaped. One of the things that the planned unit development ordinance does is it requires buffers. Buffer strips around the development and that's true with any such development and that's what, this is part of the buffer that surrounds the development. 10 A A Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 Al Khngelhutz: It belongs to the developer. That's going to be pretty dog gone tough in the future to get access to Lake Susan Drive from my property to the north. Richard Hennings: Well that triangle really has nothing, would not do you any good. It doesn't come up to your property. Al Klingelhutz: Yeah it does. Richard Hennings: Unless you're talking about crossing that, but our property line is up here and this only comes that far so. Keefe: You'd have to get an easement to go across your property to get there anyway wouldn't you? Somehow. Richard Hennings: So that little triangle won't do any good. It doesn't come up far enough to the north. Keefe: It's not wide enough either at the north to consider. You couldn't get a road up there anyway because you don't have enough land that abuts. AI Klingelhutz: Where's the telephone building here? And this will be landscape property. Al -Jaffa Yes. Al Klingelhutz: Then what goes in here then? Richard Hennings: It's not our property so I don't know. Al -Jaffa The phone company. Al Klingelhutz: This is the phone company here. Al -Jaffa Yes, it's all phone company. All of this is phone company. Al Klingelhutz: The phone company comes down to Lake Susan Drive right now. Richard Hennings: No, it comes down to 101. AI Klingelhutz: I was a little concerned about this big apartment building going onto that 3 corner piece there. It wouldn't probably fit of what's going to come onto the other piece. McDonald: Did we answer your questions? Al Kbngelhutz: Well not really because I still think that it should have an outlet onto Lake Susan Drive. 11 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 Keefe: We will get a chance to consider that. We'll get a chance to consider that when the site plan review. Al Klingelhutz: Well go down and take a look at it. The telephone land I don't think extends as far to the east as it shows on that map. McDonald: Okay. Al Klingelhutz: That's a narrow strip right along side of 101. McDonald: Does anyone else have any comments or anything they want to bring to our attention? Al Klingelhutz: What was that? McDonald: Does anyone else have any comments or anything they want to bring to our attention? Okay. At that point I'll throw it, I will close the open hearing session and we will open discussion with the commissioners. Who'd like to start? Go ahead. Keefe: You know all we're approving tonight is a change of zoning and then the design standards and from what I can tell and what I'm hearing from staff I think it's reasonable to move forward with in terms of the zoning change. We'll get a chance to look at the site plan and the more specifics on what the layouts of the buildings and the roads and so forth within the development at a later time so at this time I'm in support of the zoning change. Zorn: I would agree with Dan. Papke: Yeah, I think this is, the design standards look pretty good as long as we clarify individual tenant versus individual user being limited to 8,000 square feet. I'm still really uncomfortable with this sidewalk on the east side of 101 though. It just, I don't fully understand the rationale. I understand the cost constraints and so on, but it would just seem to be a heck of a lot cheaper to put a sidewalk on the west side of 101 than it would be to build a bridge over 212 or something of that nature. So it would seem to be the time to do something like that, but other than that I think the PUD looks good. Larson: Well I confer with Kurt on that sidewalk issue. That's the only problem I have is I'd like it to maybe be considered on the other side. Or understand why they're putting it where it is. Other than that I think it looks good. I have no problems with it. Undestad: No. McDonald: No comments. I guess the only comments I have is that it appears we're doing what we say we won't do with a lot of other people. In some cases I would like to know a little bit more about what's going in there. I understand we can't, and the design standards for what should go in there would probably cover us. I have no problems with any of that. Also have some concerns about the sidewalk. I'd like to see something that, whatever it is it's temporary 12 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 and that we go to, I'm not even that much in favor on the west side because I think we ought to get the pedestrians away from 101 period. So anything that we could do to get that back into the development where it's a little safer. If those are the people we're trying to encourage to use that, which I believe we are, it's the neighborhood, it should be easy, easier for them to get across for that. So I guess I would encourage you to look at that and if there's some way to either put a stake in the ground for some right-of-way for a pedestrian bridge or to do something to make that a little bit safer because you're making two big crossings there and that just doesn't seem right. I understand cost constraints too but what's the difference between the east and west side? We need to understand that better. With that, I guess I will throw it open for a motion from the commission. Papke: Mr. Chair, I'll make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends approval of rezoning the property located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of realigned Highway 101 and Lyman Boulevard with an approximate area of 24 acres from residential single family to planned unit development mixed use incorporating design standards as listed in staff report and just a comment here, the staff report design standards do state pretty unequivocally 8,000 square feet per tenant so that's different than the language used earlier in the staff report so I think we're cool there so. McDonald: Do I have a second? Keefe: Second. Papke moved, Keefe seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of rezoning the property located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of realigned Highway 101 and Lyman Boulevard with an approximate area of 24 acres from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use incorporating the following design standards: CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a MIJCED USE PUD including a NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses • The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with meeting the daily needs of the neighborhood. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a 13 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on these lots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Commercial and office uses shall be limited to the area located south of Highway 212. Residential uses shall be located north of Highway 212 and along the western portion of the southern half. • Small to medium-sized restaurant -not to exceed 8,000 square feet per building (no drive -thin windows) • Banks with a drive-in service window • Office • Day care • Neighborhood scale commercial up to 8,000 square feet per tenant • Convenience store with or without gas pumps • Specialty retail (Book Store, Jewelry, Sporting Goods Sale/Rental, Retail Sales, Retail Shops, Apparel Sales, etc.) • Personal Services (an establishment or place of business primarily engaged in providing individual services generally related to personal needs, such as a Tailor Shop, Shoe Repair, Self -Service Laundry, Laundry Pick-up Station, Dry Cleaning, Dance Studios, etc). • Residential High Density (8-16 units per net acre). The total number of units for the entire site may not exceed 150 units. C. Building Area • Commercial/Office — Not to exceed 75,000 square feet for the entire development • Maximum Commercial/Office lot usage is a Floor Area Ratio of 0.3 • Maximum office/commercial building area per tenant may not exceed 8,000 square feet • Maximum residential units may not exceed 150 units. d. Prohibited Ancillary Uses • Drive-thru Windows except banks or pharmacies. • Outdoor storage and display of merchandise e. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Boundary Building/ Parking Setbacks (feet) Lyman Boulevard 50/50 Highway 101 50/50 Highway 212 50/50 14 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 Boundary Building/ Parking Setbacks (feet) Northerly Project Property Line 50/20 Westerly Project Property Line 50/20 Internal Project property lines 0/0 Hard Surface Coverage -Residential 50% Commercial and Office Hard Surface Coverage 70% Maximum Commercial (Retail) Building/Structure Height 1 story Maximum Office Building/Structure Height 2 stories Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less f. Non Residential Building Materials and Design There shall not be underdeveloped backsides of buildings. All elevations shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article XXM. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. g. Residential Standards Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article JOOII. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 1. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 2. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick, stone, etc. 3. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. h. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights-of-way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. 1. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to, truck loading areas, trash storage, parking lots, Large unadorned building massing, etc. 2. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 15 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 3. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells shall be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. 4. Undulating berms, north of Lyman Boulevard, north and south of Highway 212 and west of Highway 101 shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. 6. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. i. Street Furnishings Benches, kiosks, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. j. Signage The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment and the business's ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet the city's goals: a. Establish standards which permit businesses a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise their name and service; b. Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination; c. Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; d. Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; e. Preserve and protect property values; 16 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 E Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; g. Limit temporary commercial signs and advertising displays which provide an opportunity for grand opening and occasional sales events while restricting signs which create continuous visual clutter and hazards at public right-of-way intersections. P. Project Identification Sign: One project identification sign for the commercial portion of the development located at the entrance off of Highway 101. Project identification signs shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. j.2. Monument Sign: One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrance to the development off of Lake Susan Drive. One monument sign per lot shall be permitted for the commercial portion of the site. These signs shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five feet in height. These signs shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. j.3. Wall Signs: a. The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend greater than 20 feet above the ground. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, or translucent facing. b. Illuminated signs that can be viewed from neighborhoods outside the PUD site, are prohibited. c. Tenant signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant's proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 15% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. j.4. Festive Flags/Banners a. Flags and banners shall be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. b. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric or vinyl. 17 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 c. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. d. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two feet. e. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. f. Flags and banners which are tom or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. j.5. Building Directory a. In multi -tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. j.6 Directional Signs a. On -premises signs shall not be larger than four (4) square feet. The maximum height of the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet from the ground. The placement of directional signs on the property shall be so located such that the sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties (including site lines or confusion of adjoining ingress or egress) or the general appearance of the site from public rights-of-way. No more than four (4) signs shall be allowed per lot. The city council may allow additional signs in situations where access is confusing or traffic safety could be jeopardized. In. Off -premises signs shall be allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately muted through residential streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. c. Bench signs are prohibited except at transit stops as authorized by the local transit authority. d. Signs and Graphics. Wherever possible, traffic control, directional and other public signs should be consolidated and grouped with other street fixtures and furnishings to reduce visual clutter and to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement. A system of directional signs should also be established to direct traffic within the commercial area and away from residential areas. j.7. Prohibited Signs: • Pylon signs are prohibited. • Back lit awnings are prohibited. 18 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 • Window Signs are prohibited except for company logo/symbol and not the name. Such logo shall not exceed 10% of a window area • Menu Signs are prohibited. j.8. Sign Design and Permit Requirements: a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. c. Wall business signs shall comply with the city's sign ordinance for the Neighborhood business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the "street" front and primary parking lot front of each building. IL Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the development. High pressure sodium vapor lamps with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. 2. Light fixtures should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). Street light fixtures should accommodate vertical banners for use in identifying the commercial area. 3. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1h candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 4. Lighting for parking areas shall minimize the use of lights on pole standards in the parking area. Rather, emphasis should be placed on building lights and poles located in close proximity to buildings. 1. Non Residential Parking 1. Parking shall be provided based on the shared use of parking areas whenever possible. Cross access easements and the joint use of parking facilities shall be protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. 2. The development shall be treated as an integrated shopping center and provide a minimum of one space per 200 square feet of commercial/retail area. The office/personal service component shall be treated as an integrated office building and provide 4.5 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 49,999 square feet, four per thousand square feet for the second 50,000 square feet, and 3.5 per thousand square feet thereafter. 19 Planning Commission Meeting — June 7, 2005 In. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. McDonald: Okay, next up on the agenda, and I guess I should make the announcement that there were two public hearings scheduled for tonight. The first public hearing dealt with a variance for a, hard surface coverage variance and I understand that that was withdrawn so that the applicant could make certain changes and then readdress it to the commission at a future date so we will be hearing that one later. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Keefe noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated May 17, 2005 as presented. Acting Chair McDonald adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 7:55 p.m.. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 20 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 0501 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 7, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers fn Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for rezoning of property from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development- MixedUse. The property is located at the northwest corner of Lyman Boulevard and realigned TH 101. Applicant Sand Companies, hrc. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen Al- Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saIi-tFlaci h h ^n Phone: 952-227- 1134 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, May 26, 2005: No. 4447) JUN 6 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.i�w was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghbklmno1ppgr'jsttuu/vwxyz V l� Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this2Z_0�day of 2005 Notary Public y 19 OWEN M. RADUENZ NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA My Commission Spm Jaa 31, m10 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $22.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter.... ........ ................... $22.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............. ....... $11.18 per column inch {CANNED CITY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PO Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1 IDD Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952 227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1150 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952 227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Form 220 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEPTIVITY TO AN LCA FUNDING AWARD As a participant in the Livable Communities Local Housing Incentives Account Program, Chanhassen supports the affordable and life -cycle objectives of the Livable Communities Act (LCA). Accordingly, it will accept and make available in a timely manner to Request for Proposal (RFP) applicant, Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC, any LCA award to the city to assist the housing program or activity proposed in this application if such an award is made. (City Manager or Administrator) Minnesota Housing Finanoe Agency 1 of 1 MHR Fmm 220 Multifamily Housin Resource I 1 22003 The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director DATE: January 12, 2005 oo SUBJ: Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case 05-01 C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Building Inspections City Council approval requires a majority of the City Council present. Phone: 952.227.1180 The applicant is requesting Concept Planned Unit &eve Fat 952.227.1190 mixed use development. Engineering 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated January 4, 2005. Phone: 952.227.1160 ACTION REQUIRED Fax: 952.227.1170 site. The Commission recommended 5-0 approval of the conceptual P, The Finance City Council approval requires a majority of the City Council present. Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Park & Recreation 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated January 4, 2005. Phase: 952.227.1120 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 4, 2005 on a subject Fax: 952.227.1110 site. The Commission recommended 5-0 approval of the conceptual P, The Recreation Center major area that still needs to be addressed between conceptual an7 preliminary is 2310 Couna Boulevard 7.1400access Phone: 952.227.1400 off of Lake Susan Drive and to the Klin elhutz property. g P P Y• Fax: 952.227.1404 RECOMMENDATION Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952221.1130 The PlanningCommission and staff recommend adoption of the motion as Fax 952.227.1110 specified on page 8 of the staff report. Public 1591 ark Road ATTACHMENTS Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 1. Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 4, 2005. Senior Center 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated January 4, 2005. Phone: 952.227.1125 3. Letter from MnDOT.dated January 10, 2005. - Fax: 952.227.1110 4. Site Plan. Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us gAplant2005 planning cmes\05-01 sand companies concept pud - 101 & lymanlexecutive summary.doc q/�'uyl ok I-e't it ju^/� � t The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a champing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A goal place to live, work, and play. 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DATE: 1/4/05 CC DATE: 1/24/05 REVIEW DEADLINE: 1/31/05 CASE #: 05-01 BY: Aanenson, K PROPOSAL: Conceptual PUD of 24 acres for commercial, office and multi -family development. LOCATION: Northwest comer of Lyman Boulevard and realigned TH 101. APPLICANT: Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South le Avenue. Waite Park, MN 56387 320-202-3100 PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Residential Single Family 2020 LAND USE PLAN:_ Mixed Use -Neighborhood Commercial or High Density Residential ACREAGEr-24 acres gross DENSITY: Res � portion of development Parcels 3 & 4 5.98 acres 11.54 units/acre Parcels 1 & 5 6.11 acres 11.95 units/acre SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a mixed use development. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving a rezoning because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 2 of 8 SUMMARY t'ompanim Inc is requesting concept PUD review for approximately 24 acres -of land. site is in the current Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). While utilities are available to the site it has not been developed because of the proposed improvements in conjunction with Highways 212, 101 and Lyman Boulevard. Scheduled improvements on these roads will not be completed until 2007 so it is unlikely that development will begin before then. Conceptual review of the property allows the developer to close on the purchase of the property and work with MnDot, the County and the City on the infrastructure improvements. The property is currently zoned RSF, Residential Single Family it is guided Mixed Use. The comprehensive plan states "the plan designates areas around the proposed TH 101fTH 212 0� interchanges as mixed use. This category has been established to accommodate either �OJ _commercial.or high-density residential developments. This area is in the current MUSA. The commercial use is intended to support or compliment the high-density development. If the city is to be developed commercially it shall -be _borhood commercial zonin Aistrict " State law states that the zoning and the land use designation be consistent. She land use designation is the official control. Therefore, a rezoning to a mixed-use PUD would be" consistent with the land use. Staff is recommending approval of the concept PUD. BACKGROUND The subject site was given the mixed-use land use designation in the I2aLS2TRMhMgXaILaL update because of its proximity to the proposed -2 1interchange glkZhway 101. The land use designation of mixed use allows residenti of 8-1 units per acre and neighbo ood business r district (see attached zoning standards). L44-( V- I �/� Southwest Metro Transit was recently rezoned to a similar mixed-use PUD. Under the next level of review the PUD design standards will be drafted to deal with the development standards. 'I hese standards will include architecture, height, setback, landscaping, buffering, signage, lighting, parking and permitted uses (see attached Ordinance No. 379). The intersection.of Lyman -Boulevard and State Highway-Wl will be realigned with the improvements to. lig away-2124112—These improvements are not scheduled to be completed untiP2607. Development of this site will have to coordinate with these improvements. The applicant has met with the Planning Commission informally at two separate work sessions. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on December 16, 2004. The purpose of the concept review is to give further direction to the applicant as the development plan proceeds forward for conceptual review. Following is the requirements for conceptual PUD review. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 3 of 8 Concept PUD - What is required? The ipterr of the concept plan is to get direction from the Planning Co—miffissisn a>� Q un 'I without incurring a lot of expense. There will be a greater level of detail reqs through the city code and the conditions of approv, v in this report. Following are the ` regwrements for conceptual PUD approval. , ,1 Sec. 20-517 General concept plan. Chanhassen City Code ��u✓ (a) The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the city showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: (1) Overall gross and net density. (2) Identification of each lot size and lot width. (3) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. (4) General location and extent of public and common open space. (5) General location and type of land uses and intensities of development. (6) Staging and time schedule for development. (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 4 of 8 obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior thereto to owners of land within five hundred (500) feet of the boundary of the property and an on-site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commission, the city council shall consider the proposal. If the planning commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the city council may proceed without the report. The council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions, as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four-fifths vote of the entire council. ANALYSIS The subject site is divided ' to 4 development parce . Parcels 1 and 5 include the area north of the proposed Highway 21 ban e. Thi a is residential and proposes townhouses north of the extension of Lake Susan Drive and townhouses and an apartment building between the new Highway 212 and Lake Susan Drive. Density as proposed is just under 12 units per acre. Parcel-44ncjudes a 33-Storvf a,+�,Pnr h,,;ldine with69 uni . This development is also just under 12 units per ac . Parcel 3 or the rest of the site is proposed for commercial and office ^'—Ywm-. 'The southern portion of Parcel 3 is adjacent to residential development. Commercial development is not recommended in this area. The plan proposes a single -story office building. Staff believes that this provides a good buffer to the residential uses. The PUD ordinance also requires a 50 -foot buffer from the change in uses that are separated by a roadway. The restriction of uses and their location will be specified in the PUD. In addition, no drive- throughs will be permitted except for banks (see attached Land Use Detail Map). Following are conceptual comments that the various city departments have offered that need to be incorporated into the next submittal: Enaneerin2 • The extension of Lake Susan Drive, from its current terminus to the intersection of new highway 101, will be required for development of and access to parcels 1 and 5. • The proposed driveway access locations off of Lake Susan Drive for parcels 1 and 5 must either be in the same location or meet minimum offset requirements of the City and/or County. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 5 of 8 The applicant should be aware that current Mn/DOT plans for the TH 212 improvements show a median in Lake Susan Drive, in front of the proposed access location to parcel 5. This would limit the access to a right-in/right-out only. Additionally, staff is recommending that access to parcel 5 be considered to come from a combined access with the property to the north, not off of Lake Susan Drive. • The locations of the internal public roadway which will serve parcels 3 and 4 will be reviewed in detail at the preliminary plat phase. The roadway will need to meet all current design requirements for City streets including: minimum width, alignment, and curve radii requirements. The location of the south intersection of the new road at Lyman Boulevard will need to be re -located to the east so that it's over the existing sewer and water lines. • Parcels 3 and 4 may be subject to future traffic signal and -tum lane assessments for the benefit of the improvements to new highway 101. • A temporary easement for trail construction will be required along the north side of Lyman Boulevard. • The right-of-way for old highway 101, between Lyman and Lake Susan Drive, will need to be vacated prior to any final plat recording for this site. • Public utility easements will be required over the existing sanitary sewer and water lines that go through the site. • The development will be required to meet existing site runoff rates for the 10- and 100 -year storms. Wetlands Existing Wetlands One ag/urban wetland exists on-site. The wetland has not been delineated. A wetland delineation must be submitted prior to submittal of a development plan. Wetland buffer widths of 16.5 feet must be maintained around all wetlands on-site. All structures must maintain a 40 -foot setback from wetland buffer edges. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. Storm Water And Erosion Control Storm Water Management The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District is proposing a regional storm water pond in the southwest corner of Parcels 3 and 4 as part of their Lake Riley Basic Water Management Plan. In addition, the City will be locating a trail on the north side of Lyman Boulevard. The applicant should work with the agencies to accommodate the necessary improvements. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 6 of 8 Erosion Control Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Sloe Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a st9M wafer conveyance system, such as a curb and -gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. Surface Water Management Fees Surface Water Management fees will be calculated when the precise breakdown of land uses is solidified and must be paid to the City prior to final plat recording. (These fees range from approximately $3,800 to approximately $14,000 per acre based on development type.) Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. Landscauin¢ Landscaping requirements can be broken down into the following areas: Parking lots: All parking lots will require landscaping within and at the perimeter of the lots. Landscaped islands and peninsulas will be required in any lot over 6,000 square feet in size. All landscape islands are required to have a minimum inside width of 10 feet. Buildings: All buildings will be required to have foundation plantings. Residential areas will be required to meet subdivision tree preservation and reforestation requirements. Streets: Boulevard tree plantings are required along any collector roads, such as Lake Susan Drive. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 7 of 8 Bufferyards: Bufferyard plantings will be required between parcels with different land uses, along streets and on the property of any office, mixed use, or commercial properties. A bufferyard planting will be required along the property line abutting the Chanhassen Hills neighborhood. Other. The city promotes the planting of native species. Groupings of shade trees and shrubs along natural areas, such as wetlands, are recommended as well as in areas such as the tot lot or the common areas between townhomes. Staff also recommends an interior streetscape of boulevard trees. Park Parcels #1 & #5 - Proposed 73 units of apartment homes and townhomes Comprehensive Park Plan This site lies within the park service area (1/2 mile) of Chanhassen Hills Park. Convenient access to the park will be available via a south trail route or on -street along Lake Susan Drive. Full park fees shall be collected in lieu of parkland dedication at the rate in force at the time of final plat. Comprehensive Trail Plan A section of the City's comprehensive trail plan currently exists on the west side of Highway 101 at this location. This trail section needs to be maintained in its entirety. The future construction of Highway 212 will terminate the existing trail at the highway's north right-of-way line. However, a new trail connector along the northern edge of the new highway leading to the southern outlet of Lake Susan Drive and to Chanhassen Hills Park will be constructed. Sidewalks connecting the various buildings to the nearby trail system should be included in the plan. Parcels #3 & #4 — Proposed 69 units of apartment homes and neighborhood business Comprehensive Park Plan This site also lies within the park service area of Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the apartment building will utilize a trail connector over new Highway 212 to access the park. Full park fees shall be collected in lieu of parkland dedication at the rate in force at the time of final plat. Comprehensive Trail Phan New trails along the north side of Lyman Boulevard and east side of new Highway 101 south are being planned for construction as a part of the Highway 212 project. Appropriate sidewalk connections to both of these trails should be included in the project plans. Building Comments None at this time. Sand Companies, Inc. Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01 January 4, 2005 Page 8 of 8 Fire Marshal Comments None at this time. H- ousine A part of the city's comprehensive plan deals with housing goals and policies. The city does participate in the Livable Communities Act and has goals for housing diversity and affordability. Because of the location of this site in close proximity to mass transit, staff is recommending that some of the housing be considered for "affordable housing." The city is lacking most in affordable rental housing but consideration should be give to both housing types. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Plamiing Commission feeenHnead appmYal e City Council approve the concept PUD with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Submittal letter and application. 2. Public Hearing Notice and Property Owners List. 3. Notice of Neighborhood Meeting dated December 8, 2004. 3. Zoning Districts R-16 and BN. 4. Ordinance No. 379. 5. Land Use Detail Map. 6. Site Plan. g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-01 sand companiesconcept pud - 101 & lymaMstaff report 1 4-05 revised.doc December 1, 2004 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED City of Chanhassen DEC 2 2004 Planning Commission 7700 Market Boulevard CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: General Concept Plan Review Sand Companies, Inc. Development (Curry Property) Dear Commission Members; 0A • SCI Sand Companies, Inc. 366 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park, MN 56387-0727 Orrice: (320) 202-3100 Fax: (320) 202-3139 E-mail: SCI@SandCompanies.com Website: www.SandCompanies.com In accordance with Sec. 20-517. General Concept Plan, we are making submission of drawings and supporting information for the property generally known as Cunt' Property, but defined as Parcels #1 and #5 north of the proposed Highway #212 and Highway #101 intersection and Parcels #3 and #4 south of the same imersecron. We provide the following information in answer to the 6 information request made: (1) Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways and road locations; See Sheet A-0.1 for proposed layout of the north sites. Parcel #5 is to be devoted to two story townhouse buildings with double garages. Parcel #1 is to support development of 16 townhomes and 51 apartment homes in a three story building over a basement parking garage. On site vehicle traffic will be on private drives, and pedestrians will be accommodated with internal sidewalks connecting to walks along Lake Susan Drive. See sheet A-0.2 for the proposed layout of the south site. Parcel #4, with it large wetland area, will serve as the site for a three story building with 69 apartment homes over a basement parking garage. Parcel #3 will be developed for Neighborhood Business uses including service type offices, financial institutions, convenience store with gas pumps, and some neighborhood retails shops such as submarine shops, optical shops, pizza stores etc. Vehicular traffic is organized along a public street connecting between proposed intersection of Highway #101 and the on-off ramp to #212, and intersection of Lyman Boulevard-at-theexisting Highway #101 location. We propose an internal sidewalk along one side of this internal street. (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; As noted on the plans, the apartment buildings are three story over parking garages, mostly below grade. The apartment buildings are 10 feet floor to floor, so third floor is 20 feet above grade, with the building eave height at about 29 feet. Because we prefer fairly step roof pitches, we would expect total peak heights to approach 45 feet to the roof ridge, or 37 feet to average roof height. The townhomes are two story, with eave heights at about 18 feet and roof ridge heights in the range of 30 feet. The commercial buildings will all be limited to one story, and to the extent we can control the individual building designs we would expect use of sloped roofs with eaves heights in the range of 10-14 feet and ridges in the range of 24 to 36 feet. P.'SO-Co RDvv.D nAChaoha Land Dc Iopm nt#"300Vvchittt \Sim RcIatedT1 n W9C0n==m120104.dm Construction ♦ Property Management ♦ Development Equal Opportunity Employer (3) Type, member or square footage or intensities of specific land use; Parcels #1 and #5 on the north will be used for multiple residential use. A total of 7 buildings is proposed. The sites total 6.11 acres after additional right-of-way is taken for highway development, resulting in a density of 11.95 units per acre. Parcel #4 on the south will also be multiple residential with a density of 11.54 units per acre. At Parcel #3, actual building sizes will be largely dictated by setbacks and parking requirements. The drawing on Sheet A-0.2 shows a total of 41, 500 sq. of building, but his is just to represent on possible approach to the development of these building sites. In some cases, somewhat larger buildings could be developed (financial institution) without burdening the site parking ability. (4) Number of dwelling units; A total of 142 living units is proposed. �y (5) Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved; Sheets A-0.1 and A-0.2 show the extent of development. Areas have been established for water retention ponds, although no detailed design analysis has been completed. The significant wetland on parcel #4 will be retained, and there is current interest on the part of watershed district in utilizing some portion of Parcel #4 as part of a larger area water treatment system. We plan to cooperate in that effort. (6) Staging and timing of development; Both the massive highway construction process and market forces will control development of these parcels. It would be our goal to have building construction activity underway on parcels #1 and #5 during the summer of 2005. We expect little commercial demand for Parcel #3 until highway traffic on #101 is in place, so construction starts there are more likely to be very late 2005 or into 2006. Sand Companies, Inc. plans to conduct a neighborhood information meeting from 7:00 to 9:00 PM on December 15 at the Chanhassen Country Inn and Suites. Notices will be mailed to all within 500 feet of the property this week. Beyond the I i` x IT' site drawings we have prepared a large site drawing over an aerial photo that illustrates the relationship between our proposed development, the highway system and existing neighborhoods. We hope this is helpful to area residents and Planning Commission members alike. Sincerely P:\SCI-Come& Dev. DMChadi.Lard De Id p.M404-300'vlyddmUm \SiW RdalMPlarmmgCommisvml20104.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 OS -o l CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT APPLICANT: Sand Companies, Inc. OWNER: Sand Companies, Inc. ADDRESS: 366 S 10th Ave Waite Park MN TELEPHONE (Day Time) 320-202-3100 ADDRESS: 366 S 10th Ave Waite Park MN 56387 TELEPHONE: 320-202-3100 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-0f--Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non -conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit ✓ Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review y/ Notification Sign Site Plan Review' X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost" - $50 CUP/SPRA/ACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB Subdivision' JTOTAL FEE $ 925.00 Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box ❑ In Possesion Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. 'Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81h" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. *"Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: Sand Companies Development, Chanhassen MN LOCATION: Northwest & Southwest comers of intersection of Highway 212 & 101 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached ALTA Survey for parcel descriptions. TOTAL ACREAGE: 21.77 WETLANDS PRESENT: ✓ YES NO PRESENTZONING: RSF REQUESTED ZONING: PUD PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Mixed use REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Mixed use REASON FOR REQUEST: To allow development of the various sites in conformance with the guided uses. This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authonzafinn to nrrn:er:d with the study.. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Application Received on 1,4 . o 1 a-dz, 0 Date ate Fee Paid 9at5c� Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 23, 2004, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Concept PUD, Sand Companies, Inc. — Planning Case No. 05-01 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day of Notary Public P Karen J. Engelhardt, Deputy Clerk Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4 2005 at 7:00 .m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Markit Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development for Proposal: commercial, office and multi -family development on approximately 22 acres of property_ Planning File: 05-01 _ Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Property Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Blvd. and the Location: future realigned Highway 101. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain Input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1 Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the prof osed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Questions & Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Comments: or e-mail kaananson@ci,chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide City Review Procedure: copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Pian Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested parry is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciavindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have somethino to be Included In the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development for Proposal: eorrlmercial, office and multi -family development on approximatei 22 acres of property Planning File: 5-01 Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Property Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Blvd. and the Location: future realigned Highway 101. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain Input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1 Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project, 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952.227.1139 Comments: or e-mail kaanensonfci.chanhassen.mn.us. if you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any Interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal a9 a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to Commemiavindustrlal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included In the report to the City Council. It you Wish to have something to be Included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notiflcaffon. CHRISTOPHER T & AIMEE J ADAMS RICHARD C & SUSAN M AMBERSON MICHAEL B & CATHERINE 8690 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 8549 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S ANDERSON CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8709 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT F & KAREN L ANDERSON 8561 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG R & GERALDINE BARETTE 8695 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TERRY LEE & MARI T BERANAK 8576 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EDWARD S & NANCY J COUGHLIN 587 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK A & LAURENE FARRELL 801 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS P HAGMAN & SUSAN M BARTENETTI 625 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DANIEL M & MELISSA L HERZOG 8790 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RONALD G & JOYCE L HORR 8513 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG A & MICHELLE D ALINE 8705 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317' R STEVEN & MAURA BARNETT 8709 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOSHUA E & CORA L CONKLIN 8990 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES A CURRY 6105 EDEN PRAIRIE RD #17 EDINA MN 55436 JASON J GILBERTSON & KATJAJEANNERET 583 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HUSSAM HASSOUN 8537 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER & DEBORA K HOL 8687 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRIAN W & KRISTIN A HOULE 880 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RUSSELL G BAHENSKY 8552 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WILLIAM E BENSON 8596 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ALAN COSENTINO & SHERRI BEER-, . . 8572 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NORMAN & JACQUELINE ENGEL 8699 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGG D GUTSCHOW & BARBARA J CLAYTON 8691 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREGORY J & SUSAN L HENKEL 8699 MARY JANE CIR. y_ CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TROY & JENNIFER HOLASEK 8556 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BENJAMIN R K & DONNA M JOHNSON 8521 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICIA JOHNSON SHANNON G & MICHELLE A KERN LAWRENCE C & ELIZABETH KLEIN 8715 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N 607 SUMMERFIELD DR 9170 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 AL & M J KLINGELHUTZ TRUST S & TRACY L KURVERS C/O ALOYSIUS & M J KLINGELHUTZ MARK 0 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANTHONY LARSON & LINDSAY NELSON 8545 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HARLAN C LEOPOLD 8553 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID S & JANICE A LUNDQ_OIST 8705 MARY JANE CIR ^ CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL G & KAREN L MCNEIL 8695 MARY JANE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DENNIS H & RUTH L LAUFENBURGER 8673 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LONG LI & YING Z WANG 8557 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SO VAN LY & SUSAN YKUN UNG 8509 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CYNTHIA ANN MILLER 891 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & STACEY G LAKOSKY 8533 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KHANH & KHIEM LE 631 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 ROBERT B MARTINOVICH & PATRICIA A MARTINOVICH 8592 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GREG ALLAN MILLER 8801 LAKE SUSAN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TIMOTHY S & TAMARA S MILLER PATRICK L & KIM M MISMASH LISA K MOORE 579 SUMMERFIELD DR 591 SUMMERFIELD DR 8682 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL W & ANA E MORENO CRAIG L & PATRICIA A MULLEN ERIC S & JULIE A OYEN 603 SUMMERFIELD DR .611 SUMMERFIELD DR 615 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN N;CHAMiASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVE J & MARY A PANENO 8564 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY A & MICHELLE M REITAN 8900 QUINN RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SEONGWOO PARK & MIN JEONG HAN 8580 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL & MELISSA ROHRMOSER 8698 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PHOULITHAT PHANDANOUVONG & VATSANA PHANDANOUVONG 8529 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RAYMOND J ROOB JR & CHAE SUK ROOB 8584 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS A & GRETA K ROSE JEFFREY A & TANYA L SCHNEIDER PAUL C SCHNETTLER & 8541 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S 8702 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N KATE D WARD SCHNETTLER CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 599 SUMMERFIELD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SCH AMY J TE ETAL KEITH E & LISA L SCHWEGLER MARK & KRISTINA SCHWENDINGER 8990QUINN RRD 619 SUMMERFIELD DR 8708 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N PO BOX 668 8 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DONALD T SINNIGER & MICHELE M ABEL 600 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES JONATHON SOMMERS & KAREN D ROGGE 8683 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SPRINGFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSN 7100 MADISON AVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 LESLIE E TIDSTROM 8679 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 UTPAL R VAIDYA & LEENA UTPAL VAIDYA 861 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID M SMITH & PATRICE N LUNDGREN-SMITH 8568 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & JODI L SOTEBEER 8565 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL MN 55155 ABBA J TREGOBOV & SUSANA P MACHADO-TREGOBOV 8714 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN H & RUTH M VANCE 8588 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JUDSON E & JILL C SNELL 8694 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CURTIS A & SUSAN M SPERLING 8525 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRUCE.A & SHEILA M TANQUIST 8569 CHANHASSEN HLS DR S" ' CHANHASSEN MN 55317 US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP INC ATTN: TAX DEPT M/S 624 PO BOX 7028 BEDMINSTER NJ 07921 BRYAN J & LISA C VAN NINGEN 8686 CHANHASSEN HLS DR N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMI D WALKER CORY M & PAMELA S WATKINS FRANK T & MARY LOU WHALEY 8517 CHANHASSEN HLLS DR S 595 SUMMERFIELD DR B54 I. YIyMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 December 8, 2004 Greetings from Sand Companies, Inc. � ►S'CI Sand Companies, lnc. 366 South Tenth Avenue PO Box 727 Waite Park. MN 56387-0727 Office: (320)202-3100 Fax: (320)202-3139 E-mail: SCN SandCompanics.com Website: www.SandCompanics.com Sand Companies, Inc. is proposing to de m..�-lnp the northwest and southwest quadrants of the &turc. rcaligu Highway=.101- and ,tlte new Highway 312 (formerly 212) into a neighborhood commercial and residential development. We are inviting you to an informal neighborhood meeting to answer any questions and invite your input about our proposed development. Date: Thursday, December 16, 2004 Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: Caunt Suites Chanhassen 591 West 78' Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Pine and Oak Rooms 952-937-2424 if you have any questions in advance of the ureeting, please do not hesitate to contact me at (320) 202-3100 or via e-mail at RAHennippaSandComnanies.com. You can also visit our website at www.SaiidCompanies.com to learn about our current developments. Tbank you_ . Construction ♦ Property Management ♦ Development Equal OppiwninitY Emplo. er Z014MG § 20-680 (2) The minimum lot frontage is as follows: a. If a two-family dwelling is located on the lot, fifty (50) feet per dwelling unit, except that if the lot fronts on a cul-de-sac, the lot shall be fifty (50) feet in width at the building setback line. b. If a townhouse or multiple -family project is located on the lot; one hundred fifty (150) feet. (3) The minimum lot depth is one hundred fifty-five, (155) feet. (4) The maximum lot coverage is thirty-five (35) percent. (5) The setbacks are as follows: a. For front yards, twenty-five (25) feet. b. For rear yards, twenty-five (25) feet. C. For side yards, ten (10) feet. (6) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal struchue, three (3) stories/ thirty-five (35)feet. (Ord.' b. For accessory structures, one (1) story/fifteen (I5) feet. Sec. 20-676. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "R-12" District: (1) Reserved. (2) Temporary real estate office and model homes. (Ord. Nu. izv, g Secs. 20-677-20-679. Reserved. DIVISION 2. "R-16" DISTRICT' Sec. 20-680. Intent. The intent of the R-16 District is to provide for multifamily residential structures at a maximum net density of sixteen (16) dwelling unW'per acre on land guided for high density residential uses by the city comprehensive plan. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90) 'Editor's note—Section 1 of Ord. No. 123, adopted Mar. 12, 1990, amended Art. XV by adding §§ 20-680-20-684. At the editor's discretion,.the new provisions have been included as Div. 2 to this article. Supp. No. 9 1219 § 20-681 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE Sec. 20-681. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in an R-16 District: (1) Multifamily dwellings. (2) Public and private parks and open space. (3) Utility services. (4) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (Ord_ No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90; Ord: No. 259, §'19, 11-12-96) Sec. 20-682. Permitted accessory uses. The following are nerreitted accessoryuses in an R-16 District: (1) Garage. (2) Storage building, (3) Swimming pool. (4) Tennis court. (5) Signs as per allowed in R-12 District. (6) Home occupations. (7) One (1) dock. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90) , Sec. 20-683. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in an R-16 District: `l, Churches. (7-11 Day ca.c vcutca. `" Group home serving from seven (7) to sixteen (16) persons. (4) Health services. `rj, Recreational beach lots. l� l Temporary real estate office and model home. (-l)tf Towers and antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. Sec. 20-684. "t requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an R-16 District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum lot area is as follows:. a. Two thousand seven hundred (2,700) square feet per dwelling unit. Supp. No. 9 1220 ZONING. § 20.692 :`(2) The maximum lot coverage is fifty (50) percent. (3) The building setbacks are as follows: a. For front yards, fifty (50) feet. b. For rear yards, fifty (50) feet. C. For side yards, fifty (50) feet. (4) Parking setbacks shall be twenty-five (25) feet from all property lines.. (5) The maximum height is as follows: a: For the principal structure, three (3) storieg/thirty-five (35) feet - b. For accessory structures, one (1) story/fifteen (15) feet. (Ord. No. 123, § 1, 3-12-90) Secs. 20-685-20-690. Reserved. ARTICLE XVI. mr-r NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT Sec. 20-691. In+ +� The intent of the "BN" District is to provide for limited low intensity neighborhood retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 10(5-10-1), 12-15-86) See. 20-692. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in a "BN" District: (1) Antenna as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (2) Community center. (3) Convenience stores without gas pumps. (4) Day care center. (5) Health services. (6) Home Furnishings. (7 Offices (8) Personal services. (9) Private clubs and lodges. (10) Shopping center. (11) Small appliance repair shop Supp_ No. 10 _ 1L61 § 20-692 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE (12) Specialty Retail Shop. (13) Utility services. (14) Veterinary clinics. Sec. 20-693. Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in a 'BN" District: (1) Parking lots. (2) Reserved. (3) Sim. (4) Temporary outdoor sales (subject to the requirements of section 20-312). Sec. 20-694. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in a 'BN" District: (1) Bed and breakfast establishments. (2) Convenience store with gas pumps. (3) Drive-in banks including automated kiosks. (4) Fast food restaurants without a drive-through as part of a shopping center. (5) Motor Fuel Station. (6) Reserved. § 4(7), 1 (7) Standard restaurants. - - Sec. 20-695. Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in a "BN" District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum district area is three (3) acres. This paragraph maybe waived in the case of expansion to an existing district. (2) The minimum lot area is fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. (3) _ The minimum lot frontage is seventy-five (75) feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall have a minimum frontage of sixty (60) feet in all districts. (4) The minimum lot depth is one hundred fifty (150) feet. (5) The maximum lot coverage including all structures and paved surfaces is sixty-five (65) percent. Supp. No. 10 1222 ZONING § 20-695 (6) Off-street parking shall comply witi district setback requirements except a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad right-of-way, except as provided in sections 20-1191 and 20-1192 pertaining to landscaping require- ments. b. There is no minimum setback when it abuts, without beingseparated by a street, another off-street paAing area. C. The minimum setback is fifty (50) feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right -of --way. d. The minimum setback is twenty-five (25) feet for side street side yards. e. Parking setbacks along public rights -of way may be reduced to a minimum of ten - - - (10) feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that one -hundred -percent screening is provided at least five (5) feet above the adjacent parking lot. The intent of this section is that the city is willing to trade a reduced setback for additional landscaping thatisboth an effective screen and of high quality aesthetically. Acceptable screening is to be comprised of berming and landscaping. Screening through the use of fencing is not permitted. (7) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, one (1) story. b. For accessory structures, one (1) story. (8) Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards, thirty-five QLfeet. b. For rear yards, thirty (3Weet. C. For side yards, fifteen (L51 feet. d. The minimum setback is fifty (50) feet when it abuts a resideritial district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. e. Buffer yards: The city comprehensive plan establishes.a requirement for buffer yards. Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density uses. In these areas, a fifty -foot buffer yard is to be provided where the interface occurs along a public street, a one -hundred -foot buffer yard is required where the interface occurs on internal lot lines. The buffer yard is an additional setback requirement. It is to be cumulatively calculated with the required setbacks outlined above. The frill obligation to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use. 5 The buffer yard is intended to provide additional physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use. As such, they will be required to be provided with a combination of berming, landscaping and/or tree preservation to maximize the buffering potential. To the extent deemed feasible by the city, new plantings shall be Supp. No. 9 1223 §-20-69.5 mmmssm crry com designed to require the minimum of maintenance, however, such maintenance as may be required to maintain consistency with appip plan, shall be the obligation of the property owner. Bxffpr yards shall be covered by 'a.perman ently recorded conservation easement running in favor of the city. In instances where A'ML ting topograp y and/or d1or veptation provide buffering .erin satisfac- torY to the city, or where quality site planning is achieved, the city may reduce buffer yard requirements by up to fifty (50) p-6rcent. The applicant shall have the fall burden of demobstr1itifig compliance with the standards hereim. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 10(5-10-5), 12-15-86; Ord; No: 94, §§ 1, 2, 7-25-88;'.Ord. No. 136, §§ IA, 1B, 1-28-91j) Sec. 20-696. Interim uses. The following are interim use's in the "BN" District: -(I) Churches. (2) Reserved. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90; Ord. No. 243, § 4,2-13-95) Sees. 20-697-20-710. Reserved. ARTICLE XVII. 'BH" HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS SERVI(jES DISTRICT Sec. 20-711. Intent. The intent of the "BH" District is to provide for highway oriented commercial development restricted to-aJow-building profile, (Ord. No. nn, f- 5436) Sec- 26-712. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in a "BH" District: (1) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. Car wash. (3) Community center. (Jf) Convenience stores without gas pumps. r-"' Day care center. Fast food restaurant C7) Financial institutions withlor without drive-through services. Supp. No. 9 1224 H CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 379 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property as described below from RSF, Single Family Residential District to PUD -Mixed Use, Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use: All of west half of the northwest quarter of section 24, township I It, - southerly of the right -0f --way for TH 312 and easterly of right-of-way line of realigned TH 101, and north of the right-of-way for Lyman Boulevard. Section 2. The rezoning of this property is subject to the following design standards: PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a Mixed Use PUD including a Transit Oriented Development, Neighborhood Commercial and Residential. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses • The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with meeting the daily needs of the neighborhood and the transit facility users. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on these lots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Commercial and transit uses shall be limited to the area located north of the access point off of Highway 101. Residential uses shall be located south of the Highway 101 access. • Small to medium sized restaurant -not to exceed 8,000 square feet per building (no drive-thru windows) • Office • day care • neighborhood scale commercial up to 8,000 square feet per building footprint • convenience store without gas pumps • specialty retail (book store jewelry, Sporting Goods saletrental, Retail Sales, Retail Shops, Apparel Sales, etc.) • personal services (an establishment or place of business primarily engaged in providing individual services generally related to personal needs, such as a tailor shop, Shoe Repair, Self-service Laundry, Laundry Pick-up Station, Dry Cleaning, dance studios, etc). • Park and Ride not to exceed 800 spaces. • Residential High Density (8-16 units per acre). C. Prohibited Ancillary Uses • Drive thru Windows + Outdoor storage and display of merchandise d. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks: Boundary Building and Parking Setback -LymanBoulevard 50 feet Highway 101 35 feet north of the Highway 101 access and 50 feet south of the 101 access Highway 212 excluding transit shelters and rams 50 feet Easterly Project Property Line 100 Feet Internal Project property lines 0 Feet Hard Surface Cover 50% Commercial and Transit Facility Hard Surface Coverage 70% . Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less Maximum Commercial Building/Structure Height 1 story Maximum Park and Ride Ramp excluding the elevator shaft and stair well 25 or 3 stories, I whichever is less e. Non Residential Building Materials and Design The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. The intent is to create a neighborhood and transit friendly development. 2 2. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Major exterior surfaces of all walls shall be face brick, stone, glass, stucco, architecturally treated concrete, cast in place panels, decorative block, or cedar siding. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted block or brick. Bright, long, continuous bands are prohibited- 3. rohibited 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. Exposed cement ("cinder') blocks shall be prohibited 4. Metal siding, gray concrete, curtain walls and similar materials will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials, or as trim or as HVAC screen, and may not exceed more than 25 percent of a wall area. 5. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 6. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing ._...,. material. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 7. The buildings shall have varied and interesting detailing. The use of large unadorned, concrete panels and concrete block, or a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in materials, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public ways shall be prohibited. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. 8. There shall not be underdeveloped backsides of buildings. All elevations shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. 9. The materials and colors used for each building shall be selected in context with the adjacent building and provide for a harmonious integration with them. Extreme variations between buildings in terms of overall appearance, bulk and height, setbacks and colors shall be prohibited. L Residential Standards Building exterior material shall be a combination of fiber -cement siding, vinyl siding, stucco, or brick with support materials such as cedar shakes, brick and stone or approved equivalent materials as determined by the city. 2. Each unit shall utilize accent architectural features such as arched louvers, dormers, etc. 3. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 4. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building or landscaping. 5. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick and stone. 6. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. g. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights-of-way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. 1. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to, truck loading areas, trash storage, parking lots, Large unadorned building massing, etc. 2. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 3. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells shall be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. 4. Undulating berms, north of Lyman Boulevard and east of Highway 101 shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed Ala iequired boulevard landscaping -shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. 6. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. h. Street Furnishings Benches, kiosks, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. 0 i. Signage The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment and the business's ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet the city's goals: • Establish standards which permit businesses a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise their name and service; • Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination; • Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; • Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; • Preserve and protect property values; • Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; • Limit temporary commercial signs and advertising displays which provide an opportunity for grand opening and occasional sales events while restricting signs which create continuous visual clutter and hazards at public right-of-way intersections. 1. Project Identification Sim: One project identification sign shall be permitted for the development at the entrance off of Highway 101. Project identification signs shall not exiled 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. 2. Monument Sign: One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrance to the development off of Lyman Boulevard. This sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. 3. Wall Signs: a. The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend greater than 20 5 feet above the ground. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, or translucent facing. b. Illuminated signs that can be viewed from neighborhoods outside the PUD site,. are prohibited. c. Tenant signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant's proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 15% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. 4. Festive Flags/Banners a. Flags and bammers shall be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. b. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric or vinyl. c. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. d. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two feet. e. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. f. Flags and banners which are torn or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. 5. 8:;:13cnz Matctory ................ _ . ... . a. In multi -tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. 6. Directional Signs a. On -premises signs shall not be larger than four (4) square feet. The maximum height of the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet from the ground. The placement of directional signs on the property shall be so located such that the sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties (including site lines or confusion of adjoining ingress or egress) or the general appearance of the site from public rights-of-way. No more than four (4) signs shall be allowed per lot. The city council may allow additional signs in situations where access is confusing or traffic safety could be jeopardized. b. Off -premises signs shall be allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately routed through residential streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. c. Bench signs are prohibited except at transit stops as authorized by the local transit authority. d. Signs and Graphics. Wherever possible, traffic control, directional and other public signs should be consolidated and grouped with other street fixtures and furnishings to reduce visual clutter and to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement. A system of directional signs should also be established to direct traffic within the commercial area and away from residential areas. 7. Prohibited Signs: • Individual lots are not permitted low profile ground business sign. • Pylon signs are prohibited. • Back lit awnings are prohibited. • Window Signs are prohibited except for company logo/symbol and not the name. Such logo shall not exceed 10% of a window area • Menu Signs are prohibited. 8. Sign Design and permit requirements: a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should lir; consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. c. Wall business signs shall comply with the city's sign ordinance for the Neighborhood business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the "street" front and primary . parking lot front of each building. j. Lighting I. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the 7 development. High pressure sodium vapor lamps with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. 2. Light fixtures should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). Street light fixtures should accommodate vertical banners for use in identifying the commercial area. The fixtures shall conform with (Figure 36 — Chanhassen Lighting Unit Design). 3. All light fixtures shall be shielded. _. A A I xw 71ayQ uwa i i i I Flpro K - Ce+m,.m LLNivi Uwe Drop {I Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 4. Lighting for parking areas shall minimize the use of lights on pole standards in the parking area. Rather, emphasis should be placed on building lights and poles located in close proximity to buildings. k. Non Residential Parking 1. Parking shall be provided based on the shared use of parking areas whenever possible. Cross access easements and the joint use of parking facilities shall be protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. 2. The development shall be treated as an integrated shopping center and provide a minimum of one space per 200 square feet -of commerciallretail area. The bfficelpersc;,:.: S:s. .'cc Component shall'be treated as an integrated office building and provide 4.5 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 49,999 square feet, four per thousand square feet for the second 50,000 square feet, and 3.5 per thousand square feet thereafter. 1. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2004. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, Clerk/Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Summary Ordinance published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 15'h, 2004) w Sand Companies Land Use Detail Map TOWNHOU � APTS. �.J f / TOWNHOUSES i \ - 1 6ASA� SOUTHWEST METRO < TRANSIT < COMMERCIAL APTS. n Lu COMMERCIAL WETLAND OFFICE j RESIDENTIAL 50' BUFFER \ 1 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL, THE FUTURE REALIGNED HIGHWAY 101, SAND COMPANIES, INC., PLANNING CASE No. 05-01. Public Present: Name Address Jamie Thelen 366 South 10`s Avenue, Waite Park, MN Jim Sand 366 South 100'Avenue, Waite Park, MN Al Klingelhutz 8600 Great Plains Boulevard Richard A. Hennings 366 South 10'h Avenue, Waite Park, MN Christopher Hol 8687 Chanhassen Hills Drive North Keith Collins 7420 Coventry Way, Edina Patty & Craig Mullen 611 Summerfield Drive April Halbe 9151 Great Plains Boulevard Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. Lillehaug: ...and then can you comment on the very northerly parcel, parcel number 5. I think I missed it. Why is that odd shaped right-of-way skewing down? What's the deal with that? Aanenson: Yeah. That's Qwest has a building there. Qwest, a switch station. Lillehaug: So the City's going to maintain permanent right-of-way over that whole entire area? Aanenson: That's not our's. It was sold to Qwest so yeah. See you've got this whole triangle piece here. What it does is. Lillehaug: Can you show that in outline, just to make sure we're talking about the same thing. Aanenson: Can you zoom in? You're talking about this piece right here. Lillehaug: Right. I mean it's approximately 60 feet plus or minus wide for you know that entire stretch and is that, so you're saying that's not going to be city right-of-way? Aanenson: There will be right-of-way in front of it, but what I'm saying is that, if you look at this is a picture superimposed over. There's a restricted median right here. So you can come in right but how do you get out? There's a median. Lillehaug: I don't think we're on the same page. Looking at this, it's this whole area right here. Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Aanenson: Yeah, I don't... Saam: It's not right-of-way Steve. I think you think it's right-of-way. It's not right-of-way. Lillehaug: That's the question. Okay, thank you. Sacchet: Any other questions of staff? No? With that I'd like to invite the applicant to come forward to give us your presentation. The short version if I may ask for it. Jim Sand: Agreed. Thank you Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, city staff. My name is Jim Sand and I'm the Vice President of Sand Companies. Vice President of Development and I have with us tonight part of our team. Our senior architect, Richard Hennings is here with us and our company President Jamie Thelen. And I don't have a lot to add to Kate's comments other than we did hold a neighborhood meeting on December 16`s. We had approximately 30 neighbors and one of the commission members attend. We had a lot of good feedback. A lot of good questions and felt that it was a real good chance to meet our neighbors. With that PH turn it over to Richard who has larger renditions of what we're proposing and go through that. Sacchet: Thank you. Richard Hennings: I think in the interest of time I would just cover, I think Kate did an admirable job of explaining our project to us so I'll just cover a few of the things that I think are pertinent. The issue of the. Sacchet: Excuse me. Do you mind directing the microphone towards you a little bit? Richard Hennings: Close enough? Sacchet: Yeah, thank you. Richard Hennings: S[ic udn� d,6 -issue of the median on Lake Susan Drive, and you may have more current information than I did. When we first started the project we were told that that meeting was going to be there. I contacted, and I don't remember the name but I contacted the engineer and he told me at that time, he thought 115 feet, and so he was encouraging me to say it's okay to put driveways off. I understand though on the other hand you had a conversation as recently as yesterday so. Aanenson: No. All plans, just to be clear, as in the previous one, all plans go to affected jurisdictions so obviously this plan went up to MnDot. We met with Jon Chiglo who is in charge of this whole project for 212 and he was aware that they're trying to draft or look at how we solve the problem because he's aware of the conflict so. Richard Hennings: I think the other thing I just want to bring up, we had talked earlier about the roadway through the southern parcel and right now the drawing that we had prepared is, I'm not a traffic engineer but I try to reflect what I thought would be kind of a traffic cahning road here and so I portrayed the road as not terribly wide and with intentional fairly sharp corners. As 2 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 ways of slowing the traffic and not encouraging it as a cut through. So kind of a fine line between a convenient to get here but not so convenient that it's a better way than going through the intersection at Lyman and I guess that's the direction we would give to civil engineers when we're talking to them and see if they can translate that into real engineering, but so right now it is intentionally drawn with 90 degree comers that would have a fairly tight radius I guess I'd describe it, so that that's one of the points you'd have to slow down, and that the roadway would not be very wide and so that we wouldn't have passing lanes and all those kinds of things. And the one other piece of information I thought we should share. The local watershed district is developing a wide area, an area wide project for purposes of water clarity on Lake Riley and some other things. And they have contacted us in regard to utilizing part of the wetland here as part of that project and what they're suggesting that they may excavate part of that wetland and create more open water as a holding pond, a fairly deep holding pond so they get quality control. That's what they're looking for. Not quantity control but quality control, and we would cooperate with them in that our other ponds would have to do with quantity control and their's would do with quality control so I would think as our project moves along we'll probably see some more information on that develop there. And then the last thing about affordable housing. Sand Companies is an active developer of tax credit housing. We have done a dozen projects over the last 8-10 years. Currently we'll have one more townhouse project in St. Joseph, Minnesota that will be constructed this year, so we are interested in that. Obviously you know it's a competitive process and just because we can all say we're interested doesn't mean that the Minnesota Housing Finance Corporation will see fit to do that. But it would be of interest to us to explore using tax credit financing for one of the buildings on the north side, and particularly the apartment building. So while we have designated a 3 story apartment building, we have to admit that we don't have a clear market for that. We have also given consideration to developing a senior cooperative on that site the same way because we think that's an interesting market here, so the usage we really haven't clarified there yet but I think you can safely assume that we will explore the tax credit housing automatically and to the extent that it is possible so. With that I guess I would just turn it over to see if there are any other questions. Sacchet: Excellent. Any questions from the applicant? No? Thank you very much. Appreciate it. With that, this is a public hearing. I'd like to open this for comments from anybody here who'd like to address this item. Please come forward at this time, if you want to address this item. And state your name and address for the record please. Let us know what you have to say. Patty Mullen: My name is Patty Mullen. I live at 611 Summerfield Drive. I'd like to start by saying unfortunately I wasn't able to make the neighborhood meetings and I wonder if there's another opportunity to get a little more input before I maybe start addressing concerns that might not be. And my biggest concerns would be that the development stay consistent with the things that are already developed in the area so as not to jeopardize the integrity of those. And I need a better understanding of buffering. Aanenson: We can certainly facilitate a meeting where we can come in and go through that specifically what the PUD buffering is and all that. We'd be happy to do that. Patty Mullen: Okay, thank you. Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: Thank you very much. Are there any other residents? Yes, if you want to please come forward and state your name and address and what you have to share with us. Chris Hol: My name's Chris Hol. I live at 8687 Chanhassen Hills Drive North so I'm on the very north end of this project. Now my concern is first of all apartment buildings. I mean you know if it's a two level building, that's fine. But I think 3, you know we moved out this way for the beauty of it and now I don't want to be looking out my back window at apartment buildings. Thankfully I'm not as affected as some of my neighbors are, but the other concern I would say is now, 101, is that going to be cul-de-saced? Saam: Yeah. Chris Hol: So that will be down there. There won't be -any way to cut through? Aanenson: Yeah, at the end of this, the old 101 will be cul-de-saced ... also towards the end where the creek is. Chris Hol: Right. Okay. Aanenson: It would not be for cut through traffic either. Chris Hol: Yeah, because the only other thing I would, my concern is, and I know it's been brought up is the Lake Susan Drive. You know people that don't want to come all the way up here are now going to maybe cut through and it's going to cause a lot more traffic for us. Aanenson: Yeah, that was one of the things we talked about with the traffic study. Chris Hol: Good, okay. That's all I want to say. Thank you. Sacchet: Anybody else Wan, ,., aulu.ess this item? Yes; AI: Please. Al Klingelhutz: Chairman, Planning Commission members. I'm A] Klingelhutz and in 8600 Great Plains Boulevard and most of the land we're talking about here tonight was land that I farmed for 60 some years. Was in my family since 1862 and I guess the one concern I have is this piece here. Aanenson: It's a connection, as I mentioned before. This is Mr. Klingelhutz' property. The original farmstead. Is how do you get access to these pieces. Al Klingelhutz: Through this property right here. And the median on Lake Susan Drive which we talked about. Kind of eliminates pretty much of the access to this 7 or 8 acre piece here. And I have a concern about that. And Kate and I have, and my two sons who plan on developing this property. It's going to be a family development. It's been a family farm. It's going to be a family development. Neal has been in construction for many years now. Our house on Lake 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Susan was the first house he built on his own. Before that he was working for some other developers. But that was the first house he built on his own and he's been building homes ever since that time and that's 21-22 years ago that he built our house. So anyway, I'm just saying this so you don't have to worry that he's. Sacchet: He knows what he's doing. Al Klingelhutz: He knows what he's doing, let's put it that way. But I do feel that there should be an access to this property somewhere on Lake Susan Drive. It could be up on this end. I know they don't want to go any closer than 600 feet from a major intersection so it'd have to be up here quite a ways, and I think there wouldn't be any problem with that... family development because they would like to have access to that same Lake Susan Drive at some point because they're going to have a small development on the north side of that, on Lake Susan Drive. That's what I was complaining about ... we've known this is going to happen for a long time. As the zoning's been there for this property and for the rest of my property plus the piece on the east side of the road. It's been pretty well publicized that some of these things are going to actually happen in this area. So that is my, our main concern is the fact that we sure would like an access to Lake Susan Drive. Sacchet: Thank you. AI Klingelhutz: That isn't to say we're going to go out through Chan Hills but we thought this way we could get onto 101, in and out. Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you very much. Slagle: Quick question if I may to staff. AI Klingelhutz: Any questions? Sacchet: For staff. Slagle; I'm just curious is, Kate why wouldn't we, to Mr. Klingelhutz' property, access it off the cul-de-sac to 101? Aanenson: We could come off this way, but you know again when you're putting additional trips on the backs of these homes, it'd be nice if we didn't have to do that. Because then you could actually build a buffer along here. If you follow what I'm saying there. That'd be the best. But that may not happen. You know certainly, when this is a private development, a PUD. A private street. Typically we don't connect two specific, so you know, can we force it to be a public street, so we're really trying to work with both properties together to make it work the best for the layout, but again then you're just forcing more trips around. Could it happen that way? Yeah, but. Slagle: Do you have a preference Mr. Klingelhutz? Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 A] Klingelhutz: Do we have apartments? Slagle: No a preference as to, could you access? Al Klingelhutz: I would prefer if we could get right onto Lake Susan Drive and circle up to Lake Susan Drive here and then come out to get over to the new 101. Slagle: Alright. Sacchet: And that's somewhat in line with what you presented in the beginning, isn't it? Aanenson: Yep. That's what we're working on. Sacchet: Okay. A] Klingelhutz: Keep that in mind because it really is a big preference. Sacchet: And it looks like staff is already pursuing that from their angle as well. Thank you. Anybody else wants to speak up to this item. Seeing nobody, I'm going to close the public hearing. Bring it back to the commission for comments, discussion. Want to start this item? Lillehaug: Sure. I'll rattle mine off. It's a concept PUD. I do want to make a note that in the developer's letter to us they indicate heights of buildings and some of the parameters that at this point I don't plan on reviewing and I expect them not to hold us to those elevations. Work with staff on developing the PUD to make sure it fits. So I just want to make sure that you have those parameters in there but we shouldn't be adhering to them at this point. Number one comment, and this is my major comment is, the two north parcels there and the Lake Susan Hills Drive. I've expressed my concerns previously regarding the cut through traffic and I know staff's aware of that but we really need to get a handle on. Not the traffic that's being generated from these two north parcels but the puicuuai i6i u'f the cut through traffic that can go through on Lake Susan Drive because I see that as a very large potential, and if I live on Lake Susan Hills Drive, it's a very direct connect without having to go through the numerous signals and I would use that, so it's, I have great concerns there so we really need to take a look at doing something there and making sure that we're not introducing cut through traffic so extreme that everyone of them residents are going to be very upset with what happened here. The parcel 5 to the north, somehow you know it split off from the parcel across from Lake Susan Drive to the south. It really needs to be worked in with something to the north, and I'm assuming that they have similar zoning or guidances. Okay, good. Berming. We talked, staff talks about landscaping and screening but I want to make sure that we're including bemring in addition to landscaping as screening. Traffic study, reiterate that. Be very clear that I would like to see a traffic study for the Lake Susan Drive connection as well the other road through the southerly site. And then definitely it needs, this site needs to work with the developer on the Klingelhutz property and access to the property to the north there and I think I have all my comments. 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: Good comments. Thanks Steve. Dan, anything to add? Keefe: My only comment would be, at least from where I sit, it seems like the developer's really doing a nice job of kind of engaging with the city and everybody else and I commend them on that and that's it. Sacchet: Thank you. Kurt. Papke: Nothing to add. Sacchet: Rich. Yeah, I think everybody's expressed very clearly. I mean it looks like, it's very encouraging that the direction that staff is exploring matches what the concern is from the Klingelhutz property to the north. To line up that access and I support it. I think we're on a good track with it. With that I'd like to have a motion. Papke: I'll make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends, approves the concept PUD with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report. Sacchet: We have a motion. Is there a second? Lillehaug: Second. Sacchet: Are there any friendly amendments? Lillehaug: The amendments as I indicated in my comments. Sacchet: Okay. Is that acceptable? Papke: Acceptable. Papke moved, Lillehaug seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01, Sand Companies, Inc., with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report and Commissioner Lillehaug's comments. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 7 •.+•"E"Or,• Minnesota Department of Transportation t Metropolitan District 'lop "op Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 January 10, 2005 Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 RECEIVED JAN 14 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SUBJECT: Sand Companies Concept Planned Unit Development Mn/DOT Review SO4-104 Northwest Corner of Re -Aligned TH 101 and Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1009 Dear Ms Aanenson: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced site plan in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following issues: • These preliminary layouts do not show any proposed intersection design or relationship to proposed TH 101 ramp/loop design. We need geometric plans and dimensions of this development in relation to Mn/DOT's ramps and loops in order to review this project in full. Please contact Lynn Clarkowski, Area Engineer, at (651) 634-2103, or lynn.clarkowski(a dot.state mn.us if you have any questions about this information request. • For the northerly site (Lake Susan Drive), the driveways off Lake Susan Drive should be opposite from each other and as far from TH 101 as possible, at the minimum 660 feet from TH 101. For the southerly sue (Lyman 8ivd), there must be a public street connection from TH 101 all the way to Lyman Blvd, for example, no dead ends, and it must have at least three lanes of approach (right, through, and left) to TH 101. A right turn lane and a left turn lane are required on TH 101 for this new street which must be aligned properly opposite Mn/DOT's ramps. Contact Lars Impola, Traffic Studies Engineer, Mn/DOT, at 651-634-2379 or lars.impola(@.dot.state.mn.us if you have any questions about these issues. More information is needed to determine whether a Mn/DOT drainage permit will be required for this project. Current drainage rates to Mn/DOT right of way must be maintained and applications for a drainage permit should include hydrologic computations for 10 and 100 year storms, drainage area maps and any other relevant information for pre- and post - construction conditions. Any wetland impacts that this development creates will need to be mitigated by the City or the developer. Please contact Martin Korthank at Mn/DOT Water Resources Engineering (651.634.2077) or (martin.korthank(adot.state.mn.usl with any questions regarding drainage permits. As a reminder, Lyman Boulevard is County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 18. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. The County must review any changes to its County State Aid Highway system so that they stay within its system limitations. You may obtain additional information regarding State Aid rules and policies in any of the following ways: ➢ hft://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateai shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ➢ Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ➢ Please go to http://www.revisor.leL,.state.mn.us/arule/8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. ➢ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. • Mn/DOTs policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between iand use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPGA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding Mn/DOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design section at (651) 582-1293. Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecgM/utility . Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Keith Van Wagner (651-582-1443), or Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. • As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. • As our request, please send an electronic .pdf file copy of your final plan submittal for our record keeping purposes to marv.iacksonnadot.state.mn.us . Please refer to Mn/DOT Review # 504-104 when emailing the .pdf file. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 582-1724 or Tod Sherman at (651) 582-1548. Sincerely, ✓�� Mary E. Jac on Intermediate Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Richard A. Hennings, Sand Companies, Inc. jC 5 511 B NNG'OM I7. I 1 = I i I I n..aas /4' NORTH NOTE: 5[TBACK5 - + 50-0' 6NW#21 tY101 �. 5UA ttB He" omes 212. TTO HOMMVS , 75- TOTAL LIVING UNRS. 1.2 ACKE5 - IAR@Lt5 - G.I I ACKM - 11,55 UNR5/ACRE �x I PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PARCELS #I * #5 5GALE: I-- Loa -o - Sand Companies, Inc. �. J965outM1 Tend A.-, �- POBUR] w.w Pak Am'smn-anf O/pn: "20Y310P Pm 020)2wly, wawa xwv.TwCoaPuLtww a-x.P: sr�®twec..P..rm. c1Tv °P CHANHA9EEN NECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CNA NHASSEN PLANNING OW worw.aM1 ae.�r+r.+ev.m w .,s.nmrooaaxaNeaa AMlW1gV OI1Y T�CWAM'nM �,' � IIS MlpWtlxl.:u lan py woin �pn SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.1 NOPTH PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT PARCELS #3 * #4 5CALE: I • — 100'-0' NOTE: 5ET5ACK5 '5O4®nWVA21210I01 30-0' m5ENMERE 69 - AEARTMENT n mn 5.9E ACRI5 - PARCft M4 1 1.9A UNIT5 / ACRE y(\ /'' \ 1 l Off . nornrc � 2 �' SW5T ��P/ / �RAGEN6 \40 ' i 6 A / WCT LAND / / / I I I LYMAN BOULEVARD .ONE STM I *WW SCI Sand Cam a fes, Inc A6 Saud Tad A—., Mm. nT W.I. 1v4 MV569814721 Fav ($20)2W131 W.N . ,ww.F—,C.,. Ew,m. Scw-dC—,-l..mm CITVOFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CH ASSEN PIANNINO DEPT mne maa `a`w�ee"`eavns 'wYO�'aexr.,uare"�w n"W alb mM SAND COMPANIES DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN PRELIMINARY SITE A-0.2 Ak •. rt -. t t, 1: North Site South Site *� Highway Plans w/Site Layout ,� rt North Site Location Realigned Highway 101 r Nen- Highway 212 Proposed Lighted Intersection r Future Southwest metro Transit Station ■ ISouth Site Location Lcman Boulevard & Highway 101 Interchang Cash cots mast maintain a mhumum distance of 600 feet to the intmecti. of bale Susan Dane and Eghway 101 0 05-01 2 m . � � # \k � \ /\ oma;� E—i§M�� x&23$ 0 05-01 3s-G� Ig Date & Time: _Tuesday, June 7, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for rezoning of property from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. Planning File: 05-01 Applicant: Sand Companies, Inc. Property Location: Located on the northwest corner of Lyman Boulevard and the future realigned Highway 101. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hail during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 Comments: or e-mail saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procetlure: • Subdivisions, Planned"Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. Cay ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The Cay Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majonty, vote of the City Council except rezonings and land from use amendments residential to commerciaUndustrial. • Minnesota state Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Offen developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any comespondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Stall person named on the notification.