The URL can be used to link to this page

03-20-2023 Agenda and PacketA.5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Note: Unless otherwise noted, work sessions are held in the Fountain Conference Room in the lower level of City Hall and are open to the public. If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. A.1 Chanhassen Bluffs Sports Complex Update A.2 City Council Roundtable A.3 Future Work Session Schedule B.7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS C.1 Invitation to 2023 Easter Egg Candy Hunt C.2 Proclamation Designating March 31, 2023 as Sharmeen Al-Jaff Day D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. D.1 Approve City Council Minutes dated March 13, 2023 D.2 Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated February 8, 2023 D.3 Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated February 14, 2023 D.4 Approve Claims Paid dated March 20, 2023 AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, MARCH 20, 2023 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD 1 D.5 Approve Interim Use Permit for Oak Creek Wholesale Nursery D.6 Approve an Encroachment Agreement between the City of Chanhassen and Fox Hill Properties, LLC. D.7 Approve an Encroachment Agreement between the City of Chanhassen and Fox Hill Properties, LLC. D.8 Award Low Quote, 2023 4th of July Tents, Tables, and Chairs D.9 Approve Publication of Request For Qualifications for Civic Campus Architect Services D.10 Award Contract for 2023 Pothole Patching D.11 Accept Proposal and Award Professional Service Agreement for the 2023 Annual Pavement Inspection and Condition Rating Services D.12 Resolution 2023-XX: Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for the 2023 City Pavement Mill & Overlay Project No. 23-04 D.13 Resolution 2023-XX: Approve Settlement Agreement for Parcels 14 and 20 as part of the CSAH 101 Improvement Project E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda). F.PUBLIC HEARINGS G.GENERAL BUSINESS G.1 Minnetonka Middle School West Access Improvement Project Update G.2 Appeal of 6621 Minnewashta Parkway: Consider a Request for Variances for the Construction (NOTE: This item was asked to be removed from the agenda by the applicant) H.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS I.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS J.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION K.CLOSED SESSION K.1 City Manager Performance Review L.ADJOURNMENT GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the 2 Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. 3 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Chanhassen Bluffs Sports Complex Update File No.Item No: A.1 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The City Council will receive information and discuss: Recent Legislative Activity/Committee Hearings Overview of ongoing work with Level 7 Development and private partners Updated facility drawings are expected to be added to the Council packet by Monday Share feedback from City Manager's presentation to the EDC on March 14 Discuss facility expectations This update may be somewhat brief, as developer representative Mark Nordland is planning to join the City Council on April 10. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION 4 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Chanhassen Bluffs Recreational Facility 5 1820 SF COMMUNITY ROOM OPEN TO FIELD HOUSE BELOW 8560 SF HALL OF FAME LOBBY ROOF 8970 SF CONCOURSE WALKING TRACK3750 SF CONCOURSE RINK 1 1,500 CAPACITY RINK 1 800 CAPACITY 580 SF M 580 SF W 790 SF CONCESSION 550 SF OFFICE / DESK 5010 SF RESTAURANT / BAR 120 SF VEST Project For Sheet Issues / Revisions Certification Project No. Drawn By Checked By Date NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice. © Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved. Consultants I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Date Signed License Number Name N O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis Minnesota 55413-1036 612.677.7100 612.677.7499 fax www.rsparch.com RSP Architects 3/6/2023 6:33:13 PM C:\Users\jweyrauch\Desktop\Project Ice BlockV3.rvt CONCOURSE LEVEL 9998.000.00 Author Checker 02/16/23 LEVEL 7 PROJECT ICE BLOCK A1 1" = 20'-0"1 CONCOURSE LEVEL FLOOR No. Date Description CHANHASSEN BLUFFS RECREATIONAL FACILITY 6 210 SF M 210 SF W 1120 SF VARSITY LOCKER ROOM1050 SF VARSITY LOCKER ROOM 50 SF JAN 50 SF MECH 200 SF STORAGE 410 SF FILM REVIEW 19650 SF FIELD HOUSE 400 SF LOCKER ROOM 400 SF LOCKER ROOM 450 SF LOCKER ROOM 400 SF LOCKER ROOM 400 SF LOCKER ROOM 450 SF LOCKER ROOM 310 SF REFEREE LOCKER ROOM 310 SF REFEREE LOCKER ROOM 400 SF LOCKER ROOM 400 SF LOCKER ROOM 990 SF VARSITY LOCKER ROOM 990 SF VARSITY LOCKER ROOM 190 SF STORAGE 3790 SF ALPHA / TRAINING 5750 SF ICE EQUIPMENT AND ZAMBONI 400 SF LOCKER ROOM 990 SF VARSITY LOCKER ROOM 990 SF VARSITY LOCKER ROOMS 400 SF LOCKER ROOMS 150 SF Room 150 SF Room ??RedundantRoomCLOCK2280 SF LOBBY 16220 SF RINK 2 16220 SF RINK 1 190 SF STORAGE 200 SF STORAGE Project For Sheet Issues / Revisions Certification Project No. Drawn By Checked By Date NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice. © Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved. Consultants I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Date Signed License Number Name N O T FO R C O N S TR U C TIO N 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis Minnesota 55413-1036 612.677.7100 612.677.7499 fax www.rsparch.com RSP Architects 3/6/2023 6:33:15 PM C:\Users\jweyrauch\Desktop\Project Ice BlockV3.rvt ICE LEVEL 9998.000.00 Author Checker mm/dd/yyyy LEVEL 7 PROJECT ICE BLOCK A2 1" = 20'-0"1 ICE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN No. Date Description CHANHASSEN BLUFFS RECREATIONAL FACILITY 7 CHANHASSEN BLUFFS RECREATIONAL FACILITY 8 CHANHASSEN BLUFFS RECREATIONAL FACILITY 9 CHANHASSEN BLUFFS RECREATIONAL FACILITY 10 CHANHASSEN BLUFFS RECREATIONAL FACILITY 11 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item City Council Roundtable File No.Item No: A.2 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION None Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The quarterly roundtable is time for the City Council to discuss items of interest, propose new items for review, and ask general questions of staff/each other. Items with interest from at least two Councilmembers may be scheduled for research by staff, future work sessions, or other action as appropriate. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION No Citizen Action Requests have been received in 2023 to date. BUDGET 12 RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Roundtable Process Overview 13 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL Roundtable Overviewand Guidelines The quarterly roundtable is scheduled time for the City Council to discuss items of interest, propose new items for review, and ask general questions of staff/each other. The roundtable is designed to fill in the gaps between the annual Strategic Plan updates. Staff will provide a one-year historical summary of the Citizen Action Request Forms received in the packet for each roundtable. Timing: Quarterly, at a work session. Procedure: Submit items for consideration and publication in the council packet by noon on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. Be prepared to give a brief overview of proposed items at the work session. Actions: The City Council should determine the next steps, using the following menu of options: 1. Do nothing at this time 2. Park for discussion during the Strategic Plan update in January 3. Request staff prepare an issue paper (requires two votes of support) 4. Refer to a commission for further consideration (requires two votes of support) 5. Schedule a city council work session (requires three votes of support) CITY OF CHANHASSEN A Community For Life. 14 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Future Work Session Schedule File No.Item No: A.3 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions: April 10, 2023 Strategic Plan Check-In April 24, 2023 BACKGROUND Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 pm on the second and fourth Monday of each month in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times as needed. 15 DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 16 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Invitation to 2023 Easter Egg Candy Hunt File No.Item No: C.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Manager Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City of Chanhassen, with the support of our local Community Event Sponsors, is proud to announce the second community event of 2023 - the 40th Annual Easter Egg Candy Hunt. Area residents, their families, and friends are invited to join us on Saturday, April 8, at 9 a.m. or 10 a.m. at City Center Park for the annual hunt! Children ages 12 and under will hunt for candy and eggs, have the chance to win special prizes, and visit with the Easter Bunny. For more information and to register for the event, visit us online at chanhassenmn.gov/easter. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION 17 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Easter Egg Candy Hunt Flyer 2023 18 Easter Egg Candy Hunt Details Hunt for candy in three different age categories! Each participant will receive a bag (with goodies!) for gathering candy and eggs, as well as the chance to find special eggs that are redeemable for prizes. Bring your camera for an eggstra-special photo with the Easter Bunny. The Candy Hunt is held rain or shine at City Center Park, North of Chanhassen City Hall at 7700 Market Boulevard. Pre-registration is strongly encouraged, and closes Friday, April 7. Day-of registration will be available, cash or check only. Register online at ChanhassenMN.gov/Easter Easter ColoringContest Rules Easter Contest coloring pages are available at City Hall, the Chanhassen Recreation Center, and at ChanhassenMN.gov/Easter Completed entries may be dropped off at Chanhassen City Hall, the Chanhassen Recreation Center (by 3:00 p.m. Friday, April 7), brought to the Egg Hunt, or submitted online (by 11:59 p.m. Sunday, April 9) to the above link. Ages 12 and under. FREE! A Very Special Thank You To Our Egg-Cellent Sponsors! Logos pictured indicate community sponsor contributions of $1,000+ AGES 12 & UNDER | $6 PER CHILD Want to become a sponsor? Visit us at ChanhassenMN.gov/Sponsorship COLORINGCONTEST TOO! PURPLE LEAF Corporate: Chanhassen Dinner Theatres; IWCO Business: Americana Community Bank; Automotive Unlimited; Bongards Premium Cheese; Chanhassen American Legion Post 580; Chick-fil-A Chanhassen & Eden Prairie; Children of Tomorrow; Eden Trace Corp; J&R Complete Auto Repair; kiddywampus; Lunds & Byerly’s Chanhassen; Mathnasium Chanhassen West; Merlin’s Ace Hardware; Nicolet National Bank; Pizzaioli; The Garden By The Woods; The Mustard Seed Landscaping & Garden Center; and Wink Family Eye Care Individual: Vernelle Clayton SILVER LEAF Corporate: Old National Bank GREEN LEAF Corporate: Ridgeview Business: Brown’s Tire & Auto; Chanhassen Chiropractic; Chanhassen Dental; Houlihan’s Restaurant and Bar; Power Systems; Premier Pool and Spa; and Xcel Energy CONTRIBUTING Corporate: Leeann Chin and Waytek Inc. Business: Be Well Chiropratic; Brian Reister State Farm Insurance; CFC Athletics; Christian Brothers Automotive - Chanhassen; Metropolitan Supply; Peak Heating and Cooling; and Turbo Nails of Chanhassen POST580 GRAB YOURCRAYONS &HAVE FUN! City of Chanhassen’s 40th AnnualEASTER EGG CANDY HUNT Saturday, April 8 | City Center Park Wave 1: 9:00 a.m. | Wave 2: 10:00 a.m. 952.445.6555 19 Chanhassen Easter Egg Candy Hunt Coloring Contest Prizes awarded in separate age categories. Pictures are judged on originality and neatness. Artists may use crayons, pencils, ink, markers, glitter, etc. Completed coloring entries may be dropped off at City Hall or the Chanhassen Recreation Center by 3:00 p.m., FRIDAY, APRIL 7, be brought to the Easter Egg Candy Hunt, or submitted online by 11:59 p.m. ON SUNDAY, APRIL 9 at ChanhassenMN.gov/Easter. Chanhassen City Hall • 7700 Market Blvd. • 952.227.1100 • Chanhassen Recreation Center • 2310 Coulter Blvd. • 952.227.1400 Name:Email:Age: 20 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Proclamation Designating March 31, 2023 as Sharmeen Al-Jaff Day File No.Item No: C.2 Agenda Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Sharmeen Al-Jaff Day Proclamation 21 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY OFCHANHASSENMarch 20, 2023 Mayor Elise Ryan SHARMEEN AL-JAFF DAY PROCLAMATION MARCH 31, 2023 Sharmeen Al-Jaff began her service to the City of Chanhassen as an Intern in the Planning Department on June 26, 1989. She was promoted to Planner I, to Planner II, and again to Senior Planner during her tenure. Sharmeen has dedicated her career to serving the residents and businesses of Chanhassen for 34 years, and; Sharmeen came to the city with education and experience in Baghdad, Iraq, and Tokyo, Japan, and consistently worked to develop herself and improve her skill set, including earning her Master’s Degree in Urban Affairs at Mankato State University in 1993; and Her reputation for excellent customer service and problem-solving is widely known and highly regarded. Her personnel file is filled with letters received over the years that recognize her for going above and beyond, being a thorough researcher, and being a pleasure to work with. For the entirety of Sharmeen’s career with the city, she has advocated and valued seniors. She has focused on ensuring that Chanhassen is a Community for Life. Her work to make sure Chanhassen provides for the needs of seniors began with the Senior Needs Task Force in 1990 and continued through the present as the staff liaison to the Commission on Aging. Sharmeen was particularly proud of becoming a member of the Act of Alzheimer’s community, seeing new senior housing projects become available for residents, and connecting residents with resources to help them age in place and; Another passion Sharmeen brought to the city was a deep care for Veterans. Each Memorial Day and Fourth of July, she could be found raising awareness and funds for the Veterans Court and Beyond the Yellow Ribbon; and Perhaps the void she will leave most profoundly is the unending support, advice, and encouragement she has offered her colleagues over the years. Sharmeen has always been there to offer a snack (likely chocolate), a listening ear, or a hug. She genuinely cares about the people in her life and makes sure that they feel appreciated. And; I, Mayor of the City of Chanhassen, do hereby designate the 31st day of March 2023 as Sharmeen Al- Jaff Day. On behalf of Chanhassen residents, businesses, and community groups alike, this day shall pay tribute to and recognize the substantial contributions Sharmeen has made to protect our community’s health, safety, and quality of life. WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, RESOLVED, 22 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Approve City Council Minutes dated March 13, 2023 File No.Item No: D.1 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council minutes dated March 13, 2023." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS City Council Work Session Minutes dated March 13, 2023 23 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes dated March 13, 2023 24 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 13, 2023 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Schubert, Councilman von Oven, and Councilman Kimber. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Jerry Ruegemer, Park & Recreation Director; Ari Lyksett, Communications Manager; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT: Bryan Harjes, HKGi COMMISSION APPLICANT INTERVIEWS The City Council interviewed commission applicant Rob Swanson. DISCUSS COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS The City Council discussed commission appointments. REVIEW CIVIC CAMPUS PREFERRED CONCEPT AND SCHEDULE Bryan Harjes of HKGi provided the project background and vision, the planning process to date, and the schedule and community engagement for the Civic Campus. The existing city hall was built in 1981 and lacks operational efficiency, has significant deferred maintenance needs, and no longer serves the population of Chanhassen. A facilities study was conducted by Snow Kreilich Architects and Kraus Anderson in 2021-2022 to evaluate the current building conditions and projet needs. Based on cost differentials and the ability to benefit the community, the city council decided to explore new opportunities for a new Civic Campus including City Hall, Senior Center, and new park amenities as a community focal point. The project vision is to invigorate downtown Chanhassen, provide community gathering spaces and amenities for all ages, including park amenities with a performance space, universal playground, splash pad, farmers market area, pickleball courts, new skate park, convenient park, and a heated sidewalk connection. The proposed Civic Campus park amenities were identified as Park Referendum Task Force priorities. The planning process to date has included input and feedback from city commissions and community groups. Additional public feedback will be sought to start the design phase which includes a social pinpoint site, online survey, open house and facility tours, and a city council listening session. 25 City Council Work Session Minutes – March 13, 2023 2 Moving forward, Mr. Harjes presented key steps for March, April, and May, as well as a tasks timeline for 2023 and 2024. Council expressed concerns about the size of the area between the new City Hall building and the Veterans Memorial, access to the skate park during construction, and the School District’s plans for the future location of Chanhassen Elementary School. They also asked about the bonding process and how the city will make initial contract payments. Clarification was requested regarding the use of the rental facility building. Mr. Harjes responded that it would include public restrooms, a warming house, and concessions. Council also discussed the proposed crosswalk on Kerber Boulevard at the Library entrance. Mayor Ryan suggested that the facility tour and listening session be combined to reduce the number of times the public is asked to participate. She also suggested guiding public input to focus on what they would like to see in the spaces proposed, not moving, adding, or removing elements already laid out. Councilman von Oven suggested that the city take a macro approach to the significant development elements of the Chanhassen Bluffs Recreational Facility, Civic Campus Project, and Lake Ann Preserve, separating the elements but also showing how they can work together. Ms. Hokkanen asked Mr. Harjes to discuss the proposed heated sidewalk route. Mayor Ryan asked if the redesigned parking lots would still be as accessible to the Library as they are now and will new exterior finishes be proposed. FUTURE WORK SESSION SCHEDULE March 20, 2023 Chanhassen Bluffs Recreational Facility Update City Council Roundtable City Manager’s Performance Review April 10, 2023 Strategic Plan Check-in The work session adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen City Clerk 26 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 13, 2023 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Schubert, Councilman McDonald, Councilman von Oven, Councilman Kimber COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Jerry Ruegemer, Park & Recreation Director; Ari Lyksett, Communications Manager; Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk; and Andrea Poehler McDowell, City Attorney. PUBLIC PRESENT: Kevin Clarke Hoisington, Koegler Group, Inc. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Kimber seconded that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated February 27, 2023 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 17, 2023 3. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated January 24, 2023 4. Approve Claims Paid dated March 13, 2023 5. Approve 2023 Liquor License Renewals 6.Resolution 2023-25: Approve a Professional Services Agreement for Design Services Related to Lift Station #3 Forcemain Replacement Project 7.Resolution 2023-26: Request Galpin Boulevard be added to the City's Municipal State Aid System (MSAS) 8.Resolution 2023-27:Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for the 2023 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 23-01 9. Authorize Execution of Stormwater Maintenance Agreements with FOX HILL PROPERTIES, LLC 27 City Council Minutes – March 13, 2023 2 10.Ordinance 704:Amending City Code Chapter 2, Administration, adding Code Enforcement Specialists to Enforcement of City Code, Chapter 10, Licenses, Permits and Miscellaneous Business Regulations removing the 30-day period for temporary liquor licenses, and Chapter 14, Parks and Recreation Concerning Animals in City Parks All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. PUBLIC HEARINGS:None. GENERAL BUSINESS 1. City Commission Appointments Mayor Ryan stated that the City Council interviewed candidates for the five Commissions, they had a great turnout, and appreciates everyone who applied. Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilman von Oven seconded, that the Chanhassen City Council appoints the following Commissioners for three-year terms ending March 31, 2026: Planning Commission: Eric Noyes, Steve Jobe Park and Recreation Commission: Rob Swanson, Jim Peck, Scott Pharis Economic Development Commission: Eric Anderson Environmental Commission: Leslie Elhadi, Billy Cripe Commission on Aging: Ruth Slivken, Elizabeth Mason All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 2. Lake Ann Park Preserve Project Update Park and Recreation Director Ruegemer invited Kevin Clarke with Hoisington Koegler Group (HKGi) to give a presentation on the item. Mr. Clarke gave a summary presentation of the Lake Ann Preserve project and shared the history of the park preserve, noting the importance of trails and protecting the land. He shared about wetlands on the site, trails and boardwalks, including natural surface trails, maintaining ecological work, buckthorn, and wayfinding throughout the park. Mr. Clarke noted that the site is remarkable for its beauty and that soils and in some areas of the site can be challenging as entry points all involve water crossings. The timeline includes permitting, 60% design work to understand budget realities for the phases of the project, additional supplemental resources, and documents to begin work in the winter of 2023-2024. Mr. Clarke explained the soil boring process, design development, surveying, looking at stormwater and hydraulics, and cost considerations. 28 City Council Minutes – March 13, 2023 3 Councilman Kimber asked about a number of half-down trees and whether the city plans to remove those as there will be more people, especially children, back in that area, and there may be hazards. Mr. Ruegemer replied in the affirmative, noting that the city will be active in looking at those hazardous trees as part of the design process. Mayor Ryan noted in earlier discussions, that Lennar was going to be financial contributors/participants from a signage perspective. She asked if the city has reached out to them and whether the watershed is a co-signer on applications for the grants. Mr. Ruegemer noted he was not aware of the financial conversation with Lennar and the City can certainly reach out to them. Mayor Ryan clarified that during development, the watershed said they were supportive of the plan and that when the city built a boardwalk (specifically from the Lennar development), they would help identify different species and help with signage. She noted this question is not to hold them to it but to follow up as part of the grant process. Mr. Ruegemer replied that the city has had conversations with the watershed district and they have indicated that they would like to participate in the program at Lake Ann Preserve. He does not know the scope of the funding to be donated to the project. Mayor Ryan asked whether the city will follow existing trails or explore the land to find new trails. Mr. Clarke replied that a number of trails will follow existing trails, and there are some spots that are not currently traveled that will be a new section of trail. Mayor Ryan asked about community feedback including docks and piers. Mr. Ruegemer noted that is longer-term planning and during phase two he hopes to incorporate the bituminous trail through the park, trail intersections, bird-watching stations, and other things as the city can afford those upgrades. Mayor Ryan clarified for the public that the blue hash marks on the plans indicate private property. 3. Resolution 2023-28: Approval to Enter into a Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Mr. Ruegemer stated that the city is in the process of applying for a local trail connection grant through the DNR. There have been many review meetings and he believes they have a very solid application. If awarded, the total amount of the grant would be $250,000 to allocate funding towards the Park Preserve with a caveat of a 25% match; the city council has allocated dollars from ARPA funding into that fund balance. 29 City Council Minutes – March 13, 2023 4 Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution authorizing the city to apply for and execute a grant agreement with the Minnesota DNR for improvements for the Lake Ann Park Preserve.All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 4. Present Civic Campus Concept and Schedule Kevin Clarke of HKGi gave a summary overview of the Civic Campus project. He shared about the background of downtown Chanhassen noting that the current campus built in 1981 no longer serves the population due to size, square footage, significant deferred maintenance, and it lacks operational efficiency for the community. He shared project concept plans on the screen including revamped parking, a City Hall building, and maintaining the existing Veteran’s memorial. Corresponding park improvements make a destination for downtown Chanhassen with ideas including a collective open lawn/gathering area, splash pad component, accessible playground, performance area, public restrooms, pickleball courts, and a renovated skate park component. There has been much discussion on the project launching into the next phase of design. Mr. Clarke shared about the project schedule, community engagement, architect selection, interviewing process, and contract approval, as well as construction plans through 2025-2026. Mayor Ryan noted that regarding this project and the Lake Ann Preserve project, resident engagement is at the center. Receiving feedback and resident wants, needs, and concerns will be addressed as the city moves through these projects. Ms. Hokkanen noted that the city will be launching the project page, and hosting a facility tour on April 30, 2023. Residents can attend a listening session with the City Council or leave written feedback. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. 1. Carver County Environmental Services Discussion Ms. Hokkanen noted that included in the packet is a staff report regarding the county approaching the city about a cardboard recycling site near the Public Works facility. Shortly after, the county asked about an organics recycling component. The city asked for more understanding regarding long-term recycling and yard-waste plans. She shared that the county put together a presentation, and they are engaging a consultant to do a study to address some of the city’s questions. Over the next 8 to 12 months, the county hopes to have more answers and come back to share those at that time. 30 City Council Minutes – March 13, 2023 5 CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. 1. Municipal Legislative Commission 2023 Legislative Priorities 2. Letter from Mediacom dated February 24, 2023 3. 2023 Building Permit Activity Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Kimber seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:06 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen City Clerk 31 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated February 8, 2023 File No.Item No: D.2 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, Sr. Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Environmental Commission minutes dated February 8, 2023." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 32 Environmental Commission Minutes dated February 8, 2023 33 1 Chanhassen Environmental Commission (EC) Chanhassen City Hall, Fountain Conference Room 6:00 pm February 8, 2023 Members Present: Kristin Fulkerson, Leslie Elhadi, Julia Adams, Scott Grefe, Greg Hawks, Kaisa Buckholz, Markus Fischer Members Absent: Scot Lacek Staff Present: Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager Visitors: none Minutes: January minutes were approved. Discuss public/youth event planning Julia’s environmental group wanted to do a planting. It was discussed to coordinate this activity with Arbor Day. Arbor Day Poster contest Finalize Details The theme is “Trees are Terrific and Help Us Breathe”. Jamie Marsh, intern for the city, has sent out the theme to Chanhassen schools. Arbor Day Planning Games were played last year a checker board was made in the grass. Give aways were provided by Jill Frisbees. Jamie Marsh may help with this event. This item will be revisited in March. Partner with Chanhassen High School for Earth Day Event Planning This will be combined with the Arbor Day Planning for next month. Trash pickup around area parks is a possible post for the city’s social media on Earth Day. Discuss possible Earth Hour Promotion Saturday, March 25 from 8:30-9:30 pm households are requested to turn off non-essential lights. There could some social media posts. Matt Unmacht will talk to Communication staff about posts. Trivia Night Follow UP Matt, owner of Chanhassen Brewing said that the night was well attended for a Tuesday. A comment to a commissioner from someone attending was that the event was very educational. There was discussion of possibly starting the event at 6:30 pm instead of 7 pm. Thanks to Drew Zoromski for all his help. Dave Ryan was a big draw and did a great job hosting the event. Discussion was had about the questions that had numbers as answers and the fact that they were difficult. It was brought up to maybe have less 34 2 of those questions next time. October and February will continue to have Environmental Trivia Nights and the Environmental Commission will decide at a later meeting about adding a summer trivia night event. West Water Treatment Facility Tour Jill was going to set up a tour of the facility as a field trip for the Environmental Commission. Matt Unmacht will work with utilities staff set up a tour. Commission Presentations Greg gave watershed updates – At the last meeting they agreed to pay the 6th payment on the Pioneer Wetland Restoration Project at Pioneer & 101. They passed a resolution to hire Barr Engineering to design and inlet configuration for Lake Susan Park Pond. Upcoming Items and Events Statewide meeting for Environmental Commissions put on by Conservation Minnesota and will take place in May 2023. Scott Grefe will not be attending the March meeting. Julia has an environmental club meeting next week and will discuss with them about possibly partnering with the Chanhassen Environmental Commission for Arbor Day. Meeting adjourned at 6:27 pm Minutes prepared by Jenny Potter 35 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated February 14, 2023 File No.Item No: D.3 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Amy Weidman, Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Economic Development Commission minutes dated February 14, 2023." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 36 Economic Development Commission minutes dated February 14, 2023 37 CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING February 14, 2023 Chairman Anderson called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Eric Anderson, Commissioners Duke Zurek, Chris Freeman, Stacy Goff, and Luke Bame. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Samantha DiMaggio, Economic Development Manager, and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT: Chuck Swanson, Carver County CDA. City Clerk, Kim Meuwissen, administered the Oath of Office to newly appointed Commissioner Luke Bame. Member Freeman moved; Member Zurek seconded to approve the agenda. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approve Economic Development Commission Minutes Dated January 10, 2023. Member Goff moved, Member Zurek seconded to approve the Minutes of the Economic Development Commission meeting dated January 10, 2023, as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: 1. DEED Presentation: Chanhassen Workforce Overview Mr. Chuck Swanson, Director of Community & Economic Development, shared information about the CDA and his role there. Chuck joined the CDA 9 months ago and he is the point person in Carver County for economic development, business development, land trust, tourism, county sub surface treatment systems, and rehab loan programs. DISCUSSION/GENERAL BUSINESS ITEMS: None. 38 Economic Development Commission – February 14, 2023 2 DIRECTOR’S REPORT: Community Development Director DiMaggio noted recent business visits, the implementation of SourceLink, and gave an update on the BR&E program. ADJOURNMENT: Member Zurek moved, Member Freeman seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Economic Development Commission meeting was adjourned the meeting at 6:46 p.m. Submitted by Samantha DiMaggio Economic Development Manager Prepared by Amy Weidman Administrative Support Specialist 39 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Approve Claims Paid dated March 20, 2023 File No.Item No: D.4 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director Reviewed By Kelly Grinnell SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated March 20, 2023." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION The following claims are submitted for review and approval on March 20, 2023: Total Claims $941,200.23 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 40 ATTACHMENTS Payment Summary Payment Detail 41 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 03/09/2023 0.00 88.58 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 03/09/2023 0.00 1,193.75 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 03/09/2023 0.00 1,690.74 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 03/09/2023 0.00 1,208.00 BCA 03/09/2023 0.00 15.00 BCA 03/09/2023 0.00 133.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/09/2023 0.00 10,078.84 CENTURYLINK 03/09/2023 0.00 1,105.73 Christine Lea Pedretti 03/09/2023 0.00 1,041.30 Christopher & Tracy Leskauskas 03/09/2023 0.00 74.86 CITY OF CHASKA 03/09/2023 0.00 616.80 Compass Minerals America, Inc 03/09/2023 0.00 8,412.92 CUB FOODS 03/09/2023 0.00 34.86 DAMA-MP INC 03/09/2023 0.00 54.00 David Keys 03/09/2023 0.00 123.78 Edina Realty Title 03/09/2023 0.00 189.50 EGAN COMPANY 03/09/2023 0.00 7,752.28 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. INC 03/09/2023 0.00 621.20 Engel Water Testing Inc 03/09/2023 0.00 750.00 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 03/09/2023 0.00 280.03 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 03/09/2023 0.00 116.10 GYM WORKS INC 03/09/2023 0.00 400.00 HealthPartners, Inc. 03/09/2023 0.00 84,858.04 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/09/2023 0.00 240.31 IUOE Local #49 03/09/2023 0.00 630.00 Jaime Marshik 03/09/2023 0.00 100.00 Jane Held 03/09/2023 0.00 67.26 JESSICA FLINK 03/09/2023 0.00 12.16 Judy Olson 03/09/2023 0.00 50.22 Juli Al-Hilwani 03/09/2023 0.00 146.25 Kraus Bros Landscaping & Remodeling, LLC 03/09/2023 0.00 250.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 03/09/2023 0.00 150.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 03/09/2023 0.00 52,714.00 Leslie Gilman 03/09/2023 0.00 100.00 Lynn Buchholz 03/09/2023 0.00 100.00 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 03/09/2023 0.00 351,183.00 Marco Inc 03/09/2023 0.00 1,010.00 Meghan LaLonde 03/09/2023 0.00 200.00 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/09/2023 0.00 465.52 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 03/09/2023 0.00 212,481.12 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 03/09/2023 0.00 23.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 03/09/2023 0.00 120.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 03/09/2023 0.00 128.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/09/2023 0.00 7,891.99 Page 1 of 2 42 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 03/09/2023 0.00 116,782.38 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/09/2023 0.00 52.54 Northway Irrigation 03/09/2023 0.00 2,328.13 Nuss Truck & Equipment 03/09/2023 0.00 693.60 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 03/09/2023 0.00 13,685.11 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 03/09/2023 0.00 512.17 Pinnacle Pest Control 03/09/2023 0.00 1,125.00 Rachel Meier 03/09/2023 0.00 68.09 Raftelis 03/09/2023 0.00 7,982.50 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 03/09/2023 0.00 479.78 SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 03/09/2023 0.00 500.00 Shadywood Tree Experts and Landscaping 03/09/2023 0.00 3,003.75 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 03/09/2023 0.00 105.35 Snow Kreilich Architects 03/09/2023 0.00 500.00 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 03/09/2023 0.00 4,688.00 SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA 03/09/2023 0.00 1,820.16 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 03/09/2023 0.00 854.50 Sun Life Financial 03/09/2023 0.00 3,418.46 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company 03/09/2023 0.00 210.00 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 03/09/2023 0.00 272.25 Timothy & Kimberly Greenside 03/09/2023 0.00 273.15 Title Mark 03/09/2023 0.00 11.23 Titlesmart INC 03/09/2023 0.00 144.43 Val Roder 03/09/2023 0.00 150.00 Watermark Title Agency 03/09/2023 0.00 21.86 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/09/2023 0.00 2,854.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/09/2023 0.00 26,602.52 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 03/09/2023 0.00 193.87 ZIEGLER INC 03/09/2023 0.00 169.60 SIDNEY LEVIN 03/10/2023 0.00 2,795.66 Report Total:0.00 941,200.23 Page 2 of 2 43 AP Check Detail User: dwashburn Printed: 3/14/2023 12:23:44 PM Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 701-0000-4410 88.58 3/9/2023 Concrete Masonry Saw 9" 88.58 3/9/2023 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 88.58 Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1530-4347 146.25 3/9/2023 Personal Training 146.25 3/9/2023 Al-Hilwani Juli 146.25 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 101-1310-4360 1,193.75 3/9/2023 Membership - G Bender, C Burke, E Henricksen, C Howley, M Petite 1,193.75 3/9/2023 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 1,193.75 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 701-1130-4111 401.50 3/9/2023 Utility Bill Statements AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 720-1130-4111 200.74 3/9/2023 Utility Bill Statements AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 720-1130-4111 137.40 3/9/2023 Utility Bill Envelope AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 701-1130-4111 274.80 3/9/2023 Utility Bill Envelope AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 700-1130-4111 274.80 3/9/2023 Utility Bill Envelope AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 700-1130-4111 401.50 3/9/2023 Utility Bill Statements 1,690.74 3/9/2023 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 1,690.74 AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 1 of 16 44 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 199.31 3/9/2023 Caribou Blend, Regular ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 217.20 3/9/2023 Caribou Blend, Regular, Creamer, Sugar ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 791.49 3/9/2023 Caribou Blend, Regular, Classic Cinnamon, Toffee, FrVanilla 1,208.00 3/9/2023 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 1,208.00 BCA 101-1120-4352 15.00 3/9/2023 Background Investigation BCA 101-1220-4352 133.00 3/9/2023 Background Investigation - Firefighter 148.00 3/9/2023 BCA 148.00 Buchholz Lynn 700-7204-4901 100.00 3/9/2023 Waterwise Rebate - Clothes Washer 100.00 3/9/2023 Buchholz Lynn 100.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1550-4321 688.41 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - 1456 W 78th St CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1190-4321 3,946.95 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - 7711 Kerber Blvd CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-0000-4321 147.82 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - 2323 Lake Lucy Rd CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7043-4321 2,259.55 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - 2100 Lake Harrison Rd CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1170-4321 2,246.27 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - 7700 Market Blvd CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7019-4321 789.84 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - 201 W 79th st 10,078.84 3/9/2023 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 10,078.84 CENTURYLINK 101-1170-4310 822.49 3/9/2023 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1312-4310 49.41 3/9/2023 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 6.18 3/9/2023 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1220-4310 33.88 3/9/2023 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1160-4325 125.83 3/9/2023 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1550-4310 30.88 3/9/2023 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 6.18 3/9/2023 Monthly Service AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 2 of 16 45 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description CENTURYLINK 101-1350-4310 30.88 3/9/2023 Monthly Service 1,105.73 3/9/2023 CENTURYLINK 1,105.73 CITY OF CHASKA 101-1560-4342 616.80 3/9/2023 Vikings Museum Trip 616.80 3/9/2023 CITY OF CHASKA 616.80 Compass Minerals America, Inc 101-1320-4150 8,412.92 3/9/2023 Bulk Coarse LA - Hwy 8,412.92 3/9/2023 Compass Minerals America, Inc 8,412.92 CUB FOODS 101-1220-4290 34.86 3/9/2023 Forks, Water 34.86 3/9/2023 CUB FOODS 34.86 DAMA-MP INC 101-1220-4142 54.00 3/9/2023 Model F.D. Key Box 54.00 3/9/2023 DAMA-MP INC 54.00 Edina Realty Title 720-0000-2020 14.70 3/9/2023 Refund Check 103671-000, 549 MISSION HILLS DRIVE Edina Realty Title 700-0000-2020 7.63 3/9/2023 Refund Check 103671-000, 549 MISSION HILLS DRIVE Edina Realty Title 700-0000-2020 74.68 3/9/2023 Refund Check 103671-000, 549 MISSION HILLS DRIVE Edina Realty Title 701-0000-2020 92.49 3/9/2023 Refund Check 103671-000, 549 MISSION HILLS DRIVE 189.50 3/9/2023 AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 3 of 16 46 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Edina Realty Title 189.50 EGAN COMPANY 700-7043-4150 7,752.28 3/9/2023 Service Work - Install Air separator Isolation Valve, Bleed valv 7,752.28 3/9/2023 EGAN COMPANY 7,752.28 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. INC 101-1220-4120 621.20 3/9/2023 4.5" Duplex 0/600 PSI 621.20 3/9/2023 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. INC 621.20 Engel Water Testing Inc 700-0000-4300 750.00 3/9/2023 February Water Samples 750.00 3/9/2023 Engel Water Testing Inc 750.00 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1370-4170 280.03 3/9/2023 FVP Def55Gal 280.03 3/9/2023 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 280.03 FLINK JESSICA 700-0000-2020 0.56 3/9/2023 Refund Check 019703-004, 7341 CACTUS CURVE FLINK JESSICA 720-0000-2020 9.43 3/9/2023 Refund Check 019703-004, 7341 CACTUS CURVE FLINK JESSICA 701-0000-2020 0.90 3/9/2023 Refund Check 019703-004, 7341 CACTUS CURVE FLINK JESSICA 700-0000-2020 1.27 3/9/2023 Refund Check 019703-004, 7341 CACTUS CURVE 12.16 3/9/2023 FLINK JESSICA 12.16 Gilman Leslie 700-7204-4901 100.00 3/9/2023 Waterwise Rebate - Clothes Washer AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 4 of 16 47 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 100.00 3/9/2023 Gilman Leslie 100.00 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 700-0000-4300 58.05 3/9/2023 Service calls - Feb, 2023 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 701-0000-4300 58.05 3/9/2023 Service calls - Feb, 2023 116.10 3/9/2023 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 116.10 Greenside Timothy & Kimberly 701-0000-2020 153.56 3/9/2023 Refund Check 011194-000, 7121 DERBY DRIVE Greenside Timothy & Kimberly 700-0000-2020 3.74 3/9/2023 Refund Check 011194-000, 7121 DERBY DRIVE Greenside Timothy & Kimberly 720-0000-2020 30.41 3/9/2023 Refund Check 011194-000, 7121 DERBY DRIVE Greenside Timothy & Kimberly 700-0000-2020 85.44 3/9/2023 Refund Check 011194-000, 7121 DERBY DRIVE 273.15 3/9/2023 Greenside Timothy & Kimberly 273.15 GYM WORKS INC 101-1530-4530 400.00 3/9/2023 February Preventative Maintenance, Cleaning 400.00 3/9/2023 GYM WORKS INC 400.00 HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 2,132.13 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Health - Single HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2013 91.08 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Dental HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,421.42 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Health - Single HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 1,776.22 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Health - Family - Cobra HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2013 273.32 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Dental HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 3,552.44 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Health - Family HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 -1,421.42 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Health - Single - Cobra HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2013 136.66 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Dental - Cobra HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2013 4,053.80 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Dental HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 42,629.28 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Health - Family HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 25,585.56 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Health - Single HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 3,552.44 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Health - Family AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 5 of 16 48 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2013 364.40 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Dental HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 710.71 3/9/2023 April, 2023 - Health - Single 84,858.04 3/9/2023 HealthPartners, Inc. 84,858.04 Held Jane 700-0000-2020 23.16 3/9/2023 Refund Check 100133-002, 8504 MAYFIELD COURT Held Jane 701-0000-2020 34.28 3/9/2023 Refund Check 100133-002, 8504 MAYFIELD COURT Held Jane 700-0000-2020 3.40 3/9/2023 Refund Check 100133-002, 8504 MAYFIELD COURT Held Jane 720-0000-2020 6.42 3/9/2023 Refund Check 100133-002, 8504 MAYFIELD COURT 67.26 3/9/2023 Held Jane 67.26 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 125.48 3/9/2023 Flag, Notepad, Paper, Pen Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 114.83 3/9/2023 Tab, Note, File 240.31 3/9/2023 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 240.31 IUOE Local #49 701-0000-2004 73.43 3/9/2023 PR Batch 00409.03.2023 Local 49 dues IUOE Local #49 101-0000-2004 423.42 3/9/2023 PR Batch 00409.03.2023 Local 49 dues IUOE Local #49 700-0000-2004 133.15 3/9/2023 PR Batch 00409.03.2023 Local 49 dues 630.00 3/9/2023 IUOE Local #49 630.00 Keys David 101-1806-4130 61.89 3/9/2023 End of Season Treats Keys David 101-1807-4130 61.89 3/9/2023 End of Season Treats 123.78 3/9/2023 Keys David 123.78 AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 6 of 16 49 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Kraus Bros Landscaping & Remodeling, LLC 101-0000-2073 250.00 3/9/2023 Erosion Escrow - 1525 Hemlock Way 250.00 3/9/2023 Kraus Bros Landscaping & Remodeling, LLC 250.00 LaLonde Meghan 700-7204-4901 100.00 3/9/2023 Waterwise Rebate - Toilets LaLonde Meghan 700-7204-4901 100.00 3/9/2023 Waterwise Rebate - Dishwasher 200.00 3/9/2023 LaLonde Meghan 200.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 101-1120-4370 150.00 3/9/2023 IPMA Annual Conference 150.00 3/9/2023 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 150.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 101-0000-2017 52,714.00 3/9/2023 Workers Comp 52,714.00 3/9/2023 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 52,714.00 Leskauskas Christopher & Tracy 700-0000-2020 51.96 3/9/2023 Refund Check 020942-000, 4041 PIPEWOOD LANE Leskauskas Christopher & Tracy 701-0000-2020 22.90 3/9/2023 Refund Check 020942-000, 4041 PIPEWOOD LANE 74.86 3/9/2023 Leskauskas Christopher & Tracy 74.86 LEVIN SIDNEY 700-0000-2020 65.46 3/10/2023 Refund Check 012743-000, 2841 TANAGERS LANE LEVIN SIDNEY 720-0000-2020 533.57 3/10/2023 Refund Check 012743-000, 2841 TANAGERS LANE LEVIN SIDNEY 700-0000-2020 842.34 3/10/2023 Refund Check 012743-000, 2841 TANAGERS LANE LEVIN SIDNEY 701-0000-2020 1,354.29 3/10/2023 Refund Check 012743-000, 2841 TANAGERS LANE AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 7 of 16 50 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 2,795.66 3/10/2023 LEVIN SIDNEY 2,795.66 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 720-7025-4704 351,183.00 3/9/2023 2023 Elgin Broom Bear Street Sweeper 351,183.00 3/9/2023 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 351,183.00 Marco Inc 720-0000-4410 50.50 3/9/2023 Copier Rental Marco Inc 701-0000-4410 101.00 3/9/2023 Copier Rental Marco Inc 101-1170-4410 757.50 3/9/2023 Copier Rental Marco Inc 700-0000-4410 101.00 3/9/2023 Copier Rental 1,010.00 3/9/2023 Marco Inc 1,010.00 Marshik Jaime 700-7204-4901 100.00 3/9/2023 Waterwise Rebate - Toilet 100.00 3/9/2023 Marshik Jaime 100.00 Meier Rachel 701-0000-2020 30.45 3/9/2023 Refund Check 102118-000, 7117 PONTIAC CIRCLE Meier Rachel 700-0000-2020 2.92 3/9/2023 Refund Check 102118-000, 7117 PONTIAC CIRCLE Meier Rachel 700-0000-2020 22.37 3/9/2023 Refund Check 102118-000, 7117 PONTIAC CIRCLE Meier Rachel 720-0000-2020 12.35 3/9/2023 Refund Check 102118-000, 7117 PONTIAC CIRCLE 68.09 3/9/2023 Meier Rachel 68.09 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1220-4260 229.00 3/9/2023 20V Max CL LED Lit, MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4120 146.02 3/9/2023 Pipe, Couple, 90 Elbow, Tee, Glue Titebond MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1320-4150 5.99 3/9/2023 Cable Tie AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 8 of 16 51 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-7019-4120 26.98 3/9/2023 Adapter, PVC Union MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1220-4290 39.98 3/9/2023 Aquagun Reartrig hose, Extension pole, MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-7043-4150 9.56 3/9/2023 Plastic Funnel, Pin Push Clear, Fasteners MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1190-4530 7.99 3/9/2023 Toggle Bolts 465.52 3/9/2023 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 465.52 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 700-7019-4510 440.32 3/9/2023 Strength Charge - Water Treatment Plant METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 701-0000-4509 209,343.98 3/9/2023 Waste Water Services METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 700-7043-4510 2,696.82 3/9/2023 Industrial Capacity Charge - Water Treatment Plant 212,481.12 3/9/2023 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 212,481.12 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 700-0000-4360 23.00 3/9/2023 Water Supply System Operator Renewal App - J Gillen 23.00 3/9/2023 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 23.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-1190-4300 20.00 3/9/2023 Pressure Vessel - Library MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-1170-4300 100.00 3/9/2023 Elevator Annual 120.00 3/9/2023 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 120.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 701-0000-2037 8.00 3/9/2023 PR Batch 00409.03.2023 NCPERS-Life Insurance MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 700-0000-2037 8.00 3/9/2023 PR Batch 00409.03.2023 NCPERS-Life Insurance MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 101-0000-2037 112.00 3/9/2023 PR Batch 00409.03.2023 NCPERS-Life Insurance 128.00 3/9/2023 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 128.00 AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 9 of 16 52 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 700-0000-4320 215.70 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - Hwy 101/Pionr Trl Signl MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1600-4320 621.03 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - Hwy 101/Pionr Trl Signl MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 44.10 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - 96th St & St Hwy 101 Lights MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 32.92 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - Bluff Crk & Audubon Rd MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 6,079.98 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - Hwy 101/Pionr Trl Signl MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 266.78 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - Bluff Crk Blvd Lights MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 701-0000-4320 516.97 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - Hwy 101/Pionr Trl Signl MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 114.51 3/9/2023 Monthly Service - 2151 Lyman Blvd 7,891.99 3/9/2023 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 7,891.99 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 400-0000-4705 116,782.38 3/9/2023 31698 Groundmaster 5900, Sunshade 116,782.38 3/9/2023 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 116,782.38 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 52.54 3/9/2023 Fuel Filter, Oil Filter 52.54 3/9/2023 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 52.54 Northway Irrigation 420-1310-4710 329.32 3/9/2023 Irrigation Service Northway Irrigation 601-6047-4300 1,998.81 3/9/2023 Irrigation Service 2,328.13 3/9/2023 Northway Irrigation 2,328.13 Nuss Truck & Equipment 101-1320-4520 693.60 3/9/2023 Check Engine Light - Inspection 693.60 3/9/2023 Nuss Truck & Equipment 693.60 AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 10 of 16 53 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 101-1125-4335 10,078.41 3/9/2023 Spring Summer 2023 Connection NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 101-1120-4330 2,229.96 3/9/2023 Postage NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 101-1125-4335 1,376.74 3/9/2023 Recycle Card 13,685.11 3/9/2023 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 13,685.11 Olson Judy 700-0000-2020 2.20 3/9/2023 Refund Check 015714-000, 2750 CENTURY CIRCLE Olson Judy 700-0000-2020 13.22 3/9/2023 Refund Check 015714-000, 2750 CENTURY CIRCLE Olson Judy 701-0000-2020 31.72 3/9/2023 Refund Check 015714-000, 2750 CENTURY CIRCLE Olson Judy 720-0000-2020 3.08 3/9/2023 Refund Check 015714-000, 2750 CENTURY CIRCLE 50.22 3/9/2023 Olson Judy 50.22 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1550-4140 39.30 3/9/2023 Oil Switch O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1550-4120 70.44 3/9/2023 Glass Cleaner O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1220-4140 220.41 3/9/2023 Starter O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1550-4120 -54.26 3/9/2023 DeIcer, Silicon - Return O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1550-4150 -35.22 3/9/2023 Glass Cleaner - Return O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1370-4140 76.28 3/9/2023 Platinum Plu O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1550-4140 31.40 3/9/2023 Oil Seal, Case Seal O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1550-4140 74.25 3/9/2023 Tail Lgt Asy O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1220-4140 89.57 3/9/2023 Water Pump 512.17 3/9/2023 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 512.17 Pedretti Christine Lea 101-1539-4343 1,041.30 3/9/2023 Yoga Instruction - Feb, 2023 1,041.30 3/9/2023 Pedretti Christine Lea 1,041.30 Pinnacle Pest Control 700-7019-4300 125.00 3/9/2023 Pest Control - Chanhassen East Water Treatment Plant Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1220-4300 200.00 3/9/2023 Pest Control - Chanhassen Fire Station AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 11 of 16 54 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1170-4300 200.00 3/9/2023 Pest Control - Chanhassen City Hall Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1190-4300 225.00 3/9/2023 Pest Control - Chanhassen Library Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1312-4300 250.00 3/9/2023 Pest Control - Chanhassen Public Works Pinnacle Pest Control 700-7043-4300 125.00 3/9/2023 Pest Control - Chanhassen West Water Treatment Plant 1,125.00 3/9/2023 Pinnacle Pest Control 1,125.00 Raftelis 101-1120-4300 7,982.50 3/9/2023 Chanhassen - OP Assessment Staffing - Feb 1 to Feb 28 7,982.50 3/9/2023 Raftelis 7,982.50 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 101-1550-4120 479.78 3/9/2023 Ball Mount 479.78 3/9/2023 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 479.78 Roder Val 101-1560-4343 150.00 3/9/2023 Chair Yoga 150.00 3/9/2023 Roder Val 150.00 SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 101-1220-4300 250.00 3/9/2023 Leadership Coaching SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 101-1250-4370 250.00 3/9/2023 Leadership Coaching 500.00 3/9/2023 SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 500.00 Shadywood Tree Experts and Landscaping 720-7202-4300 3,003.75 3/9/2023 Prune 3,003.75 3/9/2023 AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 12 of 16 55 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Shadywood Tree Experts and Landscaping 3,003.75 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 101-1370-4120 43.07 3/9/2023 Custom Deep Blue Ramp - Ultra SHERWIN WILLIAMS 101-1370-4120 62.28 3/9/2023 Custom Deep Blue Ramp - Ultra 105.35 3/9/2023 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 105.35 Snow Kreilich Architects 300-0000-4300 500.00 3/9/2023 Schematic Design - Chan Fire Station #1 500.00 3/9/2023 Snow Kreilich Architects 500.00 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 101-1160-4201 1,380.00 3/9/2023 Windows Server StdCore 2 Lic Core SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 101-1160-4216 728.00 3/9/2023 BlueBeam Revu Std License - Plan SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 101-1160-4202 2,580.00 3/9/2023 MS Windows Server DataCenter Renewals 4,688.00 3/9/2023 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 4,688.00 SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA 101-1420-4336 34.56 3/9/2023 Legal - Planning 2023-03 SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA 101-1310-4336 61.44 3/9/2023 City Pav Project SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA 101-1420-4336 30.72 3/9/2023 Legal - Zoning - model homes SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA 101-1110-4336 1,536.00 3/9/2023 2023 Fee Schedule SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA 101-1310-4336 34.56 3/9/2023 Project - Mill & Overlay SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA 101-1310-4336 53.76 3/9/2023 Legal - Upper Riley Creek SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA 101-1420-4336 38.40 3/9/2023 Legal - Cover Limit Single Fam SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA 101-1420-4336 30.72 3/9/2023 Legal - Removal of 1000 1,820.16 3/9/2023 SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA 1,820.16 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 101-1310-4303 854.50 3/9/2023 Th 41 at Minnetonka Middle School AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 13 of 16 56 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 854.50 3/9/2023 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 854.50 Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2037 158.64 3/9/2023 Life Insurance - March, 2023 Sun Life Financial 720-0000-2015 36.07 3/9/2023 LTD - March, 2023 Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2015 57.54 3/9/2023 LTD - March, 2023 Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2011 -27.09 3/9/2023 Life Insurance - March, 2023 - Cobra Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2011 45.23 3/9/2023 Life Insurance - March, 2023 Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2011 622.00 3/9/2023 Life Insurance - March, 2023 Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2011 29.02 3/9/2023 Life Insurance - March, 2023 Sun Life Financial 720-0000-2011 18.20 3/9/2023 Life Insurance - March, 2023 Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2015 1,236.79 3/9/2023 LTD - March, 2023 Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2015 89.68 3/9/2023 LTD - March, 2023 Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2037 158.64 3/9/2023 Life Insurance - March, 2023 Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2037 993.74 3/9/2023 Life Insurance - March, 2023 3,418.46 3/9/2023 Sun Life Financial 3,418.46 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company 101-1320-4140 210.00 3/9/2023 Cus Recon Hubpilot Whl 210.00 3/9/2023 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company 210.00 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 210-0000-4300 272.25 3/9/2023 City Council Meeting 272.25 3/9/2023 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 272.25 Title Mark 701-0000-2020 6.02 3/9/2023 Refund Check 098370-000, 7852 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE Title Mark 700-0000-2020 0.43 3/9/2023 Refund Check 098370-000, 7852 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE Title Mark 700-0000-2020 4.51 3/9/2023 Refund Check 098370-000, 7852 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE Title Mark 720-0000-2020 0.27 3/9/2023 Refund Check 098370-000, 7852 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 14 of 16 57 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 11.23 3/9/2023 Title Mark 11.23 Titlesmart INC 701-0000-2020 61.68 3/9/2023 Refund Check 016453-000, 6675 LAKEWAY DRIVE Titlesmart INC 700-0000-2020 5.42 3/9/2023 Refund Check 016453-000, 6675 LAKEWAY DRIVE Titlesmart INC 720-0000-2020 44.14 3/9/2023 Refund Check 016453-000, 6675 LAKEWAY DRIVE Titlesmart INC 700-0000-2020 33.19 3/9/2023 Refund Check 016453-000, 6675 LAKEWAY DRIVE 144.43 3/9/2023 Titlesmart INC 144.43 Watermark Title Agency 700-0000-2020 3.44 3/9/2023 Refund Check 011441-000, 6653 BRENDEN COURT Watermark Title Agency 720-0000-2020 9.25 3/9/2023 Refund Check 011441-000, 6653 BRENDEN COURT Watermark Title Agency 701-0000-2020 8.03 3/9/2023 Refund Check 011441-000, 6653 BRENDEN COURT Watermark Title Agency 700-0000-2020 1.14 3/9/2023 Refund Check 011441-000, 6653 BRENDEN COURT 21.86 3/9/2023 Watermark Title Agency 21.86 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 101-1311-4306 2,854.00 3/9/2023 2023 GIS/AMS Support Services 2,854.00 3/9/2023 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 2,854.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 117.12 3/9/2023 Service - 1701 Valley Ridge Trl S, 1591 Heron Dr XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 27.23 3/9/2023 Service - Pedestrian Flasher XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 283.77 3/9/2023 Service - Service Walk, 500 Market st Streetlight XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 27.23 3/9/2023 Service - Pedestrian Flashers XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 37.59 3/9/2023 Service - 1532 Lyman Blvd XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 188.71 3/9/2023 Service - 6431 Hazeltine Blvd XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 55.28 3/9/2023 Service - 9000 Audubon Rd Signal XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 60.31 3/9/2023 Service - 7599 Minnewashta Pkwy XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 25,564.87 3/9/2023 Signals/Lights XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 240.41 3/9/2023 7598 Laredo Dr, 6950 Minnewashta Pkwy AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 15 of 16 58 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 26,602.52 3/9/2023 XCEL ENERGY INC 26,602.52 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 101-1370-4150 193.87 3/9/2023 Zep Hvy Duty TKO Hand Cleaner 193.87 3/9/2023 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 193.87 ZIEGLER INC 101-1320-4120 169.60 3/9/2023 Parts - Gasket, Connection 169.60 3/9/2023 ZIEGLER INC 169.60 941,200.23 AP - Check Detail (3/14/2023)Page 16 of 16 59 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Approve Interim Use Permit for Oak Creek Wholesale Nursery File No.Item No: D.5 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Interim Use Permit to operate a wholesale nursery (Oak Creek Nursery) for ten (10) years or development of the site, whichever comes first, subject to the conditions of approval in the Planning Commission staff report, and adopts the Planning Commission Findings of Fact." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The applicant is requesting approval of an Interim Use Permit for the operation of a tree nursery on the property. BACKGROUND On June 13, 2022, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Final Plat for Erhart Farm creating 19 single-family lots, eight outlots, and public right-of-way. On October 25, 2021, City Council approved a grading development contract for the project to permit the developer to initiate site grading and tree removal in preparation for the infrastructure improvements for the development. 60 On August 9, 2021, City Council approved: The ordinance rezoning the development from Agricultural Estate District (A2) to Single-Family Residential District (RSF) (Blocks 1 and 2); Preliminary plat with variances for street width, front yard setback (Lot 1, Block 1), wetland setback (Lot 1, Block 1) and street frontages (Lots 3 thru 9, Block 1). DISCUSSION The applicant has been growing trees on the property since the 1980s. More recently, the applicant has applied for and received a nursery stock grower certificate from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. To maintain this certification, the applicant will need annual inspections of the growing operation by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. The approval of an Interim Use Permit memorializes the wholesale nursery operation. As a point of clarification, the approval of an Interim Use Permit does not eliminate any planted trees from being calculated as part of the tree preservation requirements for subdivisions. Only trees that have been harvested and stored in windrows of mulch type materials can be excluded from canopy coverage calculations. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 7, 2023, to review the proposed Interim Use Permit. There were no issues nor concerns for the proposal and no members of the public commented on the plan. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the Interim Use for a period of ten (10) years for the operation of a wholesale nursery subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the findings of fact and recommendation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that City Council approve the interim use permit to operate a wholesale nursery (Oak Creek Nursery) for ten (10) years or development of the site, whichever comes first, subject to the conditions of the Planning Commission staff report and adopt the Planning Commission Findings of Fact. ATTACHMENTS Interim Use Permit Oak Creek Wholesale Nursery Staff Report Findings of Fact Application for Development Review Application Narrative Affidavit of Mailing 61 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES INTERIM USE PERMIT #2023-03 1.Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants an interim use for a wholesale nursery for ten (10) years or development of the site, whichever comes first. 2.Property. The permit is for the following described property ("subject property") in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota: Outlots D, E, F, G and H, Erhart Farm, Carver County, Minnesota, and Lot 1, Block 1, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota 3.Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall operate the nursery tree growing operation as shown in the Oak Creek Nursery Map dated 12/19/2022. b. The applicant shall annually renew their nursery stock grower certification and provide the City a copy of their nursery stock grower certificate. c. Hours of operation shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday – Friday; 9:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. Saturday; and no Sunday operation. d. The applicant shall provide the city construction plans for the proposed accesses to the site for review and approval by the City prior to the commencement of wholesale nursery operations. e. Any vehicle tracking onto public rights-of-way from the site shall be the responsibility of the property owner to remove and clean immediately after the occurrence, or no later than the same day of the occurrence. If the city is required to remove and clean tracking at any point from the site, the property owner shall reimburse the city for any expense incurred to remediate the issue. 62 2 g. All disturbed areas shall be restored at the time of removal of the tree stock to prevent site erosion. The applicant shall prepare a detail or plan on how the tree holes will be restored for City review and approval. The plan may include the following: filling the hole with common excavation; adding 6 inches of topsoil; adding a specific seed mix or replanting with trees; adding erosion control blankets or other ground stabilizer; and watering and maintaining as needed. h. No grading or planting is allowed within the first 20 feet of the Bluff Creek Primary Corridor, nor within any wetlands or wetland buffer areas. i. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agency must be obtained including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and Carver County. 3.Termination of Permit.The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 4.Lapse.If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction as not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 5.Criminal Penalty.Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. 63 3 Dated: March 20, 2023 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Elise Ryan, Mayor By: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___day of March, 2023, by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 64 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: March 7, 2023 CC DATE: March 20, 2023 REVIEW DEADLINE: April 4, 2023 CASE #: 2023-03 BY: RG, EH, MJ SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of an Interim Use Permit for the operation of a tree nursery on the property. LOCATION:775 West 96th Street APPLICANT:Tim Erhart 9611 Meadowlark Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING:Agricultural Estate District, A-2 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density and Office ACREAGE:75.6 acres LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city has limited discretion in approving or denying interim use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the use standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable use standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant has been growing trees on the property since the 1980s. More recently, the applicant has applied for and received a nursery stock grower certificate from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. To maintain this certification, the applicant will need annual inspections of the growing operation by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Nursery stock grower "Nursery stock grower" includes, but is not limited to, a person who raises, grows, or propagates nursery stock, outdoors or indoors. PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the Interim Use Permit for the operation of a wholesale nursery for ten (10) years or development of the site, whichever comes first, subject to the conditions of approval, And adoption of the findings of fact and recommendation.” 65 Page 2 of 9 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article IV, Div. 5. Interim Use Permits Chapter 20, Section 20-232, General Issuance Standards Chapter 20, Section 20-269, Wholesale and retail nurseries Chapter 20, Article X, A-2, Agricultural Estate District BACKGROUND On June 13, 2022, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Final Plat for Erhart Farm creating 19 single-family lots, eight outlots, and public right-of-way: 66 Page 3 of 9 On October 25, 2021, City Council approved a grading development contract for the project to permit the developer to initiate site grading and tree removal in preparation for the infrastructure improvements for the development. On August 9, 2021, City Council approved: The ordinance rezoning the development from Agricultural Estate District (A2) to Single-Family Residential District (RSF) (Blocks 1 and 2); Preliminary plat with variances for street width, front yard setback (Lot 1, Block 1), wetland setback (Lot 1, Block 1) and street frontages (Lots 3 thru 9, Block 1). On January 25, 2021, City Council approved the Interim Use Permit to allow site grading to create an open water wetland. The project began in 2021 winter, but due to warm weather, could not be completed until 2022. On August 14, 2020, the City Council approved the adjustment to the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD) Primary Zone boundary to encompass the additional 3+ acre area adjacent to Highway 212 in Outlot H. (Planning Case #2020-13) On July 7, 2020, the City of Chanhassen received a complete Wetland Delineation Report for the property and a Notice of Application was sent on July 15, 2020. The on-site Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) was held on July 29, 2020 in order to review the wetland boundaries and types. The wetland types that were delineated on the property were Types 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6. The TEP and Local Government Unit (LGU) concurred with the boundaries and types and the Notice of Decision was issued on August 8, 2020. As part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan adopted on February 10, 2020, the city approved a three acre Land Use amendment from Residential Low Density to Office in the western portion of the parcel encompassing the area adjacent to Highway 212 in Outlot H. In 2008, as part of the city’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the city approved a Land Use amendment of the westerly 10 acres of the property from Residential-Low Density to Office. On October 23, 2006, City Council approved Wetland Alteration Permit #06-32 for the construction of an access road and stormwater pond. The wetland mitigation for this is located in Outlot G north of the large wetland complex On July 10, 1995, City Council approved the preliminary and final plat of Butternut Ridge Addition, Subdivision #95-9, creating one lot and one outlot. This subdivision created the 2½- acre home site on the property and kept the balance of the site for the owner’s personal use, tree growing and future development. 67 Page 4 of 9 SITE CONSTRAINTS Bluff Creek corridor This property is located within the Bluff Creek Overlay District in the northwesterly portion of the property. At this time, no development is proposed near the Bluff Creek primary zone. The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs, and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low-impact practices. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Section 20-1255 of the Chanhassen City Code requires a conditional use permit for all development within the Bluff Creek Corridor. The Bluff Creek Corridor primary zone is located on the property. The Primary Corridor is designated open space. All structures must meet a 40-foot structural setback from the Primary Corridor boundary as required by Chanhassen City Code. In addition, no grading is allowed within the first 20 feet of the Primary Corridor. Wetland Protection There are numerous wetlands located on the parcel. The proposed use of the property as a nursery should not impact these wetlands. Bluff Protection There are bluffs on the western portion of the property. The tree growing area along Powers Boulevard is separated from the balance of the parcel by a bluff and the Bluff Creek primary zone. 68 Page 5 of 9 Shoreland Management The property is not located within a shoreland protection district. Floodplain Overlay This property is not located within a federally designated floodplain. ACCESS Access to the property is primarily off Eagle Ridge Road and West 96 th Street. Outlot H is accessible via Powers Boulevard. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL There is no grading being proposed as part of the wholesale nursery. The Engineering Department has reviewed the Interim Use Permit (IUP) submittal for 775 W 96th Street (“Oak Creek Nursery”). These comments are divided into two categories: general comments and proposed conditions. General comments are informational points to guide the applicant in the proper planning of public works infrastructure for this proposal, to inform the applicant of possible extraordinary issues and/or to provide the basis for findings. Proposed conditions are requirements that Engineering and Public Works recommends be formally imposed on the submittal in the final order. Note that references to the “City Standards” herein refer to the City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. General Comments/Findings 1. Any and all plans submitted with this application have been reviewed only for the purpose of determining their feasibility and providing utility and transportation facilities for the IUP in accordance with City Standards. A recommendation of IUP approval does not constitute final approval of details, including but not limited to alignments, materials and points of access, connection or discharge, that are depicted or suggested in the application. The applicant is required to submit updated plans for the project, as applicable. The City of Chanhassen Engineering and Public Works Departments will review plans, in detail, when they are submitted and approve, reject or require modifications to the plans or drawings based upon conformance with City Standards, the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances and the professional engineering judgment of the City Engineer. 2. It is the opinion of the Engineering Department that the proposed IUP can be developed in accordance with the requirements of the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances (as it pertains to Engineering and Public Works requirements) and City Standards, provided it fully addresses the comments and conditions contained herein and can be approved. 69 Page 6 of 9 3. The applicant is applying to receive an IUP for a wholesale nursery as required under Section 20-269 of City Ordinance on the property located at 775 W 96th Street (“Oak Creek Nursery”). The applicant’s narrative states that tree growing operations and sales of trees have been occurring since the mid-80s on the property. All trees are sold directly to tree spade operators who remove them on-site via their tree spade equipment and depart immediately once removed with ingress/egress being had from W 96 th Street; staff recommends this route continue to be used. There is a well on site which supplies any needed watering to the growing areas so there is no need or request made for municipal water services. The applicant provided a site plan, dated December 19, 2022, which depicts the growing areas along with their proposed accesses. Based on the applicant’s narrative it would appear that the requirements of Section 20-269(b) are met, however additional details and construction plans are required regarding the accesses to Oak Creek Nursery and its growing areas. a. Section 20-269(b)(1) requires that wholesale nurseries be located on a collector or arterial road; the property meets this requirement as it abuts Eagle Ridge Road and Powers Boulevard, a city collector road and a Carver County minor arterial road, respectively. Eagle Ridge Road is planned to be extended as a result of the “Erhart Farm” subdivision approved on June 13, 2022, by City Council. The extension is tentatively scheduled to occur in 2023. The extension will provide connectivity between Eagle Ridge Road and W 96th Street, and eventually will continue west connecting to Powers Boulevard. The proposed access point to Oak Creek Nursery as depicted on the provided site plan would be had from the northwest leg of the future intersection of Eagle Ridge Road and W 96th Street. However, no further details regarding how the access will interface with the public right-of-way and future roadway extension were provided with the application. The city has standard details regarding typical accesses, e.g. commercial or industrial driveway accesses. These standards account for how accesses manage drainage, tracking of sediment and other materials out into the road, pedestrian safety, durability and approved material, etc. In order to ensure adequate management and interface with the public right-of-way is being had, the applicant must provide these details for review and approval to the city in the form of construction plans. See proposed condition 1 and 2. LANDSCAPING Nursery Stock Certification Requirements (a) All nursery stock growing at sites identified by nursery stock dealers or nursery stock growers and submitted for inspection must be inspected by the commissioner within the previous 12 months prior to sale and found apparently free from quarantine and regulated nonquarantine pests as well as significantly dangerous or potentially damaging plant pests. 70 Page 7 of 9 MISCELLANEOUS The interim use permit shall be approved for a period of 10 years from the date of City Council approval. The applicant will need to request a formal extension 60 days prior to the expiration date of the interim use permit. The Interim Use Permit shall terminate on the happening of any of the following events, whichever first occurs: (1) The date stated in the permit; (2) Upon violation of conditions under which the permit is issued; (3) Upon change in the city's zoning regulations which renders the use nonconforming; (4) Upon the subdivision of the property or the alteration of the lot lines of the property. Sec 20-269 Wholesale And Retail Nurseries 1. Intent. It is the intent of this section to recognize that preexisting retail nurseries and garden centers are located within the city and may be in conflict with the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. These establishments predate current ordinance standards. To allow for planned and orderly development, the city finds it necessary to regulate the expansion or intensification of these uses and to provide standards for any future retail nursery or garden centers. It is the intent of this section to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating the creation and the expansion of existing retail nurseries and garden centers. The creation or expansion of these uses will be allowed only by interim use permit by the city council. 2. The following conditions will apply to wholesale and retail nurseries: 1. The site must be on a collector or minor arterial as identified in the comprehensive plan. * Powers Boulevard is an arterial road. Eagle Ridge Road is a collector road. 2. The minimum lot size is five acres. * The site is 75 acres. 3. All storage and yard areas as well as buildings must be set back 50 feet from public or private road rights-of-way, and 300 feet from an adjacent single-family residence or a minimum of 50 feet from a side lot line, whichever is greater. * There are no proposed storage areas. Trees shall be spaded from the growing areas and removed from the property. 4. All outdoor storage areas must be buffered from adjacent properties. Buffering may be accomplished using berms, fencing, landscaping, natural topography, or increased setbacks. The city council may require storage areas to be completely screened by 100 percent opaque fencing or berming. * There will be no storage areas. Trees shall be spaded from the growing areas and removed from the property. 5. Hours of operation shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. The city council may further restrict hours of operation if the use is located adjacent to property guided residential as identified in the comprehensive plan. *Due to the surrounding residential homes, hours of operation shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday – Friday; 9:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. Saturday; and no Sunday operation. 71 Page 8 of 9 6. Light sources shall be shielded. * No lighting is proposed. All operation shall be during daylight hours. 7. No outside speaker systems shall be allowed without approval from the city council. * No speakers are proposed. 8. A termination date shall be established for the interim use permit. The use shall be permitted until a particular date, until the occurrence of a particular event, or until zoning regulations no longer permit it. Prior to the permit expiring, the applicant may request an extension to the interim use permit by submitting a new application. The renewal application will be subject to all city ordinances including any new ordinances enacted after the original approval. * The termination date shall be 10 years from approval, due to violation of conditions of approval or with the subdivision of the property. 9. One wall sign not to exceed 90 square feet and one monument sign not exceeding 24 square feet in size or eight feet in height shall be permitted on the premises. The council may further restrict the size and location of signs if the use is located adjacent to property guided residential as identified in the comprehensive plan. * No signage is proposed. PERMITS Permits from the appropriate regulatory agency must be obtained including but not limited to Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District, Carver County, and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. UTILITIES City utilities are not available at present to the property. The nursery shall utilize a private well for its water. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the interim use permit to operate a wholesale nursery (Oak Creek Nursery) for ten (10) years or development of the site, whichever comes first, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall operate the nursery tree growing operation as shown in the Oak Creek Nursery Map dated 12/19/2022. 2. The applicant shall annually renew their nursery stock grower certification and provide the City a copy of their nursery stock grower certificate. 3. Hours of operation shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday – Friday; 9:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. Saturday; and no Sunday operation. 72 Page 9 of 9 4. The applicant shall provide the city construction plans for the proposed accesses to the site for review and approval by the City prior to the commencement of wholesale nursery operations. 5. Any vehicle tracking onto public rights-of-way from the site shall be the responsibility of the property owner to remove and clean immediately after the occurrence, or no later than the same day of the occurrence. If the city is required to remove and clean tracking at any point from the site, the property owner shall reimburse the city for any expense incurred to remediate the issue. 6. All disturbed areas shall be restored at the time of removal of the tree stock to prevent site erosion. The applicant shall prepare a detail or plan on how the tree holes will be restored for City review and approval. The plan may include the following: filling the hole with common excavation; adding 6 inches of topsoil; adding a specific seed mix or replanting with trees; adding erosion control blankets or other ground stabilizer; and watering and maintaining as needed. 7. No grading or planting is allowed within the first 20 feet of the Bluff Creek Primary Corridor, nor within any wetlands or wetland buffer areas. 8. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agency must be obtained including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and Carver County. And adoption of the findings of fact and recommendation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Project Narrative 4. Public Hearing notice and mailing list 73 2 3 FINDINGS OF FACT AND R.E,COMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Tim Erhart for an Interim Use Permit to op€rate Oak Creek Wholesale Nursery. On March 7,2023, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Tim Erhart for an interim use permit to operate a wholesile nursery for the property located at 775 W 96s Street. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony liom all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FIND INGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A-2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. The legal description ofthe property is: Outlots D, E, F, G and H, Erhart Farm, Carver County, Minnesota, and Lot l, Block l, Buttemut fudge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota Use Standards: The proposed use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare ofthe neighborhood or the city since it will primarily be a tree growing operation with minimal access for tree spading and removal. b. The proposed use will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and the zoning ordinance. A wholesale nursery is permitted by the zoning regulations as an interim use until the development ofthe property consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed use will be designed, construcled, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general viciniry and will not change the essential character ofthat area. The use shall continue the tree growing operation on the property with minimal access for tree spading and removal. 4 a. 1 c CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA 1 74 d. The proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed use will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Public water will not be used for the tree growing operation. g. The proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because ofexcessive production of traffrc, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with uaffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic feanfes of major significance. j. The proposed use will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed use will not depreciate surrounding property values. l. The proposed use will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Article IV of the City Code. 5. The planning commission shall recommend an interim use permit and the council shall issue interim permits only if it finds, based on the proposed location, that: a. The use meets the standards of a conditional use permit use standards set forth in section 2-232 ofthe CitY Code. b. The use conforms to the zoning regulations. c. The use is allowed as an interim use in the zoning district. d. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty. e. The use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future' f. The user agrees to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for permission of the use. 2 75 6.The plaruring report #2023-03 dated March 7 , 2023, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the interim use permit subject to the conditions ofthe staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 76 day of March 2023' PLANNING COMMISSION BY: 3 76 -03 COTMUN|TY DEVELOPMENT DEPART ET{T Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevad Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-110O/ Fax: (952) 227-1110 Subrnittal Date *cnlorcnAttuAssrtt APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW b PC Clate:a CC Date:)3 6GDay Rwieiv Oate: (Reter to the afirlpdate Adtcs,io,l Cher;Hisf lq Bquhd sub/,l,ital tufomsiiott tH mui a@,npely this af,icatln) n Comprehensive Plan Amendment......................... $600 E Conditional Use Permit (CUP) E Single-Family Residence ...................-........... $325 ! rut ohers....... ..................... $500 E Subdivision (SuB) ! Create 3 lots or |ess........................................$300 E Create over 3 |ots.......................$600 + $15 per lot( lots) E lvhtes & Bor.rnds (2 lob)..................................S3fi) ! Consolidato 1ob..............................................$150tr'lnterim Use Permit (lUP) $325 ss00 fl eOminisraWe Subd. (Line Adjustsnent).........I ln conjunction with Single-Family Residence.. Eirut ourers......E Final Plat + $15 p€r lot .$150 s700' f| Rezoning (REZ) E Planned Unit Development (PUD) . ! Minor Amendment to existing PUDI att ourers E Sign Plan Review................................................... $150 I Site Pbn neuew (SPR) fl Administrative ..................... $100 E Commerciaulndus&ial Districts'...................... $500 'lndude number of 9!E!49 qnployees: 'lndude number of 49!! employ€€s: tr Metes & Bounds SuMivision (2 deeds) "'"I:,1';tff;l'3f;fffS,y"0rc"""' n zoninsAppsar '(lndudes $450 escrow for attomey costs) 'Additbnal esdw rnay ba Equir€d lo. dl6 apdication8 thrcWh ttE &vsbpl,loot cortract. ! Vacation of Eas6ments/Right-of{^,ay (VAC)........ $300 (Additiimal ,ocording fees rtay apdy) I Variance (VAR)$200 $150 $275 $200 $s00 D Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ! Single-FamilyResilenceE ntt ottrers n Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) s750 $100 $500 El Residential Disricts......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( units) p Homou- siln (cly to l.Etd dd srove)..........--.............'... $200 n Property Owners' List within 500' (city to generate after prB-application rneetihg) ....... v Escrow for Recording Ooalments (check all that E Conditional Use Permit Permit tr Vacation ?\addresses) $3 per address $50 per document ,d ! Site Plan Agreement ! Wetland Afteration Permit Easements ( easements) ! OeeOs TOTAL FEE: Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) Section 2: Required lnformation Description of Proposal: Property Address or Location:AJE llL.-zt-LL Parcel #:15tq1 DZqo Total Acreage:15 ,to Wetlands Present?.L tng: Present Land Use Designation , Qu ta) b4,"iL Requested Land Use Designation: Existing Use of Property: [f Cnect uox it separate narrative is attacfi H Erh,(<rLegal Description: Present Zoning: 77 Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant lnformation APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, sub.iect only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the app€al p€riod. lf this application has not beon signod by the proporty owner, I hav6 attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter p€rtaining to this application. I will keep mysetf informod of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I furthor undersiand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certiry that the information and exhibits submitted are true and conecl. Contact Phone: Cell: Fax: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as property owner, hav6 full l6gal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subiect only to the right to obiect at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may b€ charged for consulting fe€s, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certiry that the information and exhibits submitted are lrue and conect. Name:Contact: Phone:Address a6ll N an &o \ ,.- -r. lr L a rt{.At 2 -a63 - 6'' 1r Cityistatezip:Cell: Fax:Email:t( Signature:Oate: PRoJECTE+l€ill{Ensfth{i}#b) Name Contact: Lt't"?8L's+tlL City/State/Zip:Cell FaxEmail€L VUho should receive copies of staff reports?'Other Contact lnformatlon: El Pmp€rty Own€r E Applicant El EngineerpOtrer Email tcrl^,, ^,t/, a l e lc(t',/^.t Email Name: Address Ema City/Statezip: Email:Email INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT:Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicablo City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this apdication, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and conf€r with the Planning Deparunent to determine the sp€cific ordinance and applicabl€ procedural roquiroments. A determination of completeness of the application shall b€ made within 15 business days of apdication submittal. A wriften notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. copy to the city for processing. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital No*. Address: crty'/statozip: E-oil. Signatur€: l.1.,-- btVl-t1 ?? Addr6ss: Phone: Section4: Notification lnformation 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 Tax name Tax add l1 Tax add l2 Siteadd City Mn ZipBRYAN PRANGE 1171 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1171 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN 55317CARISSA E HAVERLY 750 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8603 750 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317CHARLES E & SANDRA R WORM TRUSTS 760 W 96TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8603 CHANHASSENDANIEL G ARLIG ETAL 710 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8603 710 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 23655 ZINN AVE PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372‐8885 1371 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN 55318GREGORY M FALCONER 720 W 96TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8603 720 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317JAMES L BROWNELL REV TRUST 1190 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8612 1190 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN 55317JASON PAUL HOLTHUS 9315 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐2708 9315 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN 55317JOHN JENSEN II 1181 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 1181 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN 55317JOHNNIE J & ELAINE A MEYERING 1050 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8634 1050 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN 55317JONATHAN NYKANEN 9317 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9317 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN 55317KEVIN J & PATRICIA A ELLSWORTH 9601 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8605 9601 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN 55317MARK A METZ 9701 FLINTLOCK TR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8637 9701 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN 55317MATTHEW E HOTCHKISS 9307 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐4859 9307 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN 55317MATTHEW JOHN SWANSON 9305 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9305 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN 55317MEGAN A STEWART 9700 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9700 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN 55317RICHARD A & BETTY A DERHAAG 711 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8603 711 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317RONALD L & KOLLEEN M BROWN 9650 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8605 9650 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN 55317SHARON NICOLE ESTRADA MORA 9651 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9651 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN 55317STATE OF MINNESOTA ‐ DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD SAINT PAUL, MN 55155 CHANHASSENSTEPHEN JAPUNTICH 9297 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9297 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN 55317TIMOTHY A & DAWNE M ERHART 9611 MEADOWLARK LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8695 775 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317VINOD VARMA 9325 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9325 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN 55317WESLEY & CAROL DUNSMORE 730 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8603 730 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317WILLIAM DENNIS JOHNSON 9600 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8605 9600 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN 55317WILLIAM F & MARY E HEINLEIN 721 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8603 721 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317WILLIAM G & ELIZABETH M AHERN 1191 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317‐8613 1191 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN 55317 85 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Approve an Encroachment Agreement between the City of Chanhassen and Fox Hill Properties, LLC. File No.Item No: D.6 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Stacy Osen, Administrative Support Specialist Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves an encroachment agreement allowing Fox Hill Properties, LLC to construct and install a private stormwater facility on the subject property that will encroach into the city's easement area located at Lot 1, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY BACKGROUND The property owner of Lot 1, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates, (Fox Hill Properties, LLC) has submitted a permit application to construct and install a private stormwater facility on the property, which is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates. This improvement will encroach into the city's easement areas. In order to permit the improvement, the property owner must enter into an encroachment agreement with the city. DISCUSSION The attached encroachment agreement was drafted by the City Attorney's office. The property owner 86 has signed the encroachment agreement which requires City Council approval before the permit can be issued. Specific conditions are outlined in the agreement. Upon city approval and execution, the encroachment agreement will be recorded against the property. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the Encroachment Agreement. ATTACHMENTS Lot 1, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates Encroachment Agreement 87 (reserv e d for rec ording infor mat ion) ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 2023, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and FOX HILL PROPERTIES, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Owner"). 1. BACKGROUND. Owner is the fee owner of certain real property located in the City of Chanhassen, County of Carver, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows: Lot I, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates, according to the recorded plat thereof (torrens) havingastreetaddressof,Chanhassen,Minnesota553|7 ("Subject Property"). The City owns easements for drainage and utility purposes over portions of the Subject Property ("Easement Areas"). Owner desires to construct and install a private stormwater facility ("Improvement") on the Subject Property that will encroach into the City's Easements Areas as depicted on the attached Exhibit "A". Z. ENCROACHMENT AUTHORIZATION. The City hereby approves the encroachment in its Easement Areas on the Subject Property for the Improvement subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement. Further conditions of encroachment approval are as follow: 225448v1 88 The City shall have no responsibility to maintain or repair the Improvement located within the Easement Areas. Owner acknowledges that the City is not responsible and will not replace the Improvement located in the Easement Areas due to any City improvements, repairs, maintenance or reconstruction of the Easement Areas The Owner, its successors and assigns, is fully responsible and liable for any and all damage caused to the Improvement or resulting from construction and/or installation of the Improvement within the Easement Areas. The Owner of the Subject Property will own and maintain the Improvement. Further, Owner agrees that the Improvement shall be constructed consistent with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 3. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY. In consideration of being allowed to encroach in the Easement Areas, Owner, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to indemni$ and hold the City harmless from any damage caused to the Subject Property, including the Improvement located in the Easement Areas, caused in whole or in part by the encroachment into the Easement Areas. 4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. The City may, at its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement at any time if it is reasonably necessary for the City to occupy the Easement Areas by giving the then owner of the Subject Property thirty (30) days advance written notice, except that no notice period will be required in the case of an emergency condition as determined solely by the City and this Agreement may then be terminated immediately. The property owner shall remove that portion of the Improvement to the extent it impacts the Easement Areas to the effective date of the termination of this Agreement. If the owner fails to do so, the City may remove the Improvement to the extent it impacts the Easement Areas and charge the cost of removal back to the owner for reimbursement. 5. RECORDING. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. a a a a 225448v1 89 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By (sEAL)Elise Ryan, Mayor And Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COLNTY OF CARVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2023, by Elise Ryan and by Laurie Hokkanen, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council Notary Public ) )ss. ) 225448v I 90 OWNER: FOX HILL PROPERTIES, LLC A Minnesota limited liability company Andrew I. Awes, Its Chief Manager By STATE OF MINNESOTA COLNTY OF ) )ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2023, by Andrew I. Awes, the Chief Manage.r of Fox Hill Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, Profess io n al Ass o ciution Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (65 I ) 452-5000 AMP 225448v1 91 LAKE Lo-rus ,;-'"'' a t I Fzr,(! J:J! { ilr'. x-i# x UJ al,fi{I {I {J € { xul *oLI * F .'. L,J uJ :': ,it ItrJ ..,.-, ..t 't- F.,iLrJ 92 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Approve an Encroachment Agreement between the City of Chanhassen and Fox Hill Properties, LLC. File No.Item No: D.7 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Stacy Osen, Administrative Support Specialist Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves an encroachment agreement allowing Fox Hill Properties, LLC to construct and install a private stormwater facility on the subject property that will encroach into the city's easement area located at Lot 2, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY BACKGROUND The property owner of Lot 2, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates (Fox Hill Properties, LLC) has submitted a permit application to construct and install a private stormwater facility on the property, legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates. This improvement will encroach into the city's easement areas. In order to permit the improvement, the property owner must enter into an encroachment agreement with the city. DISCUSSION The attached encroachment agreement was drafted by the City Attorney's office. The property owner 93 has signed the encroachment agreement which requires City Council approval before the permit can be issued. Specific conditions are outlined in the agreement. Upon city approval and execution, the encroachment agreement will be recorded against the property. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the Encroachment Agreement. ATTACHMENTS L2 B1 Fox Ridge Estates -EA 94 (re serve d.for rec ording information) ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 2023, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and FOX HILL PROPERTIES, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Owner"). l. BACKGROUND. Owner is the fee owner of certain real property located in the City of Chanhassen, County of Carver, State of Minnesota,legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block I, Fox Ridge Estotes, according to the recorded plot thereof (torrens) having a street address of Chanhassen, Minnesot a 5 53 17 ("Subject Property"). The City owns easements for drainage and utility purposes over portions of the Subject Property ("Easement Areas"). Owner desires to construct and install a private stormwater facility ("lmprovement") on the Subject Property that will encroach into the City's Easements Areas as depicted on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. ENCROACHMENT AUTHORIZATION. The City hereby approves the encroachment in its Easement Areas on the Subject Property for the Improvement subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement. Further conditions of encroachment approval are as follow: 225528v1 95 The City shall have no responsibility to maintain or repair the Improvement located within the Easement Areas. Owner acknowledges that the City is not responsible and will not replace the Improvement located in the Easement Areas due to any City improvements, repairs, maintenance or reconstruction of the Easement Areas The Owner, its successors and assigns, is fully responsible and liable for any and all damage caused to the Improvement or resulting from construction and/or installation of the Improvement within the Easement Areas. The Owner of the Subject Property will own and maintain the Improvement. Further, Owner agrees that the Improvement shall be constructed consistent with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 3. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY. In consideration of being allowed to encroach in the Easement Areas, Owner, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to indemni$ and hold the City harmless from any damage caused to the Subject Property, including the Improvement located in the Easement Areas, caused in whole or in part by the encroachment into the Easement Areas. 4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. The City may, at its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement at any time if it is reasonably necessary for the City to occupy the Easement Areas by giving the then owner of the Subject Property thirty (30) days advance written notice, except that no notice period will be required in the case of an emergency condition as determined solely by the City and this Agreement may then be terminated immediately. The property owner shall remove that portion of the Improvement to the extent it impacts the Easement Areas to the effective date of the termination of this Agreement. If the owner fails to do so, the City may remove the Improvement to the extent it impacts the Easement Areas and charge the cost of removal back to the owner for reimbursement. 5. RECORDING. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. a o a a 225528v I 96 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By (sEAL)Elise Ryan, Mayor Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COLINTY OF CARVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2023,by Elise Ryan and by Laurie Hokkanen, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public And ) )ss. ) 225528v1 97 OWNER: FOX HILL PROPERTIES, LLC A Minnesota limited liability company Andrew I. Awes, Its Chief Manager By STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ) )ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2023, by Andrew I. Awes, the Chief Manager of Fox Hill Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Can,IpsE,LL KNI,JTSON, Profess io na I A s s o c i ut i o n Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55 l2l Telephone: (65 I ) 452-5000 AMP 225528v1 98 il' ,', t-# z E IJJ th 0l z o 4 Flt1-{! .riJ:{ { .CT >4 UJ uuKE \ usuS FLtJ.'' : Lr.JUJ, I .t t-- L,J l I I t t >1o\l 99 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Award Low Quote, 2023 4th of July Tents, Tables, and Chairs File No.Item No: D.8 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Manager Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the low quote to Apres Event Decor & Tent Rental for $29,396.25 for the 2023 4th of July Celebration tents, tables, and chairs." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND Each year, the City of Chanhassen's 4th of July Celebration requires a variety of large tents, tables, and chairs to execute the event successfully. Tents are used to house Taste of Chanhassen vendors on July 3-4, and large events such as the Street Dance and Business Expo on July 3. Tables and chairs are provided to event partners and placed near food vendors for patrons. $39,000.00 is allotted for 2023 in the 1600 budget for 4th of July tent, table, chair, and staging rentals. As event partners, the Rotary Club of Chanhassen and SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce contribute annually towards the cost of tents, tables, and chairs. The total of this contribution is approximately $7,500.00. 2023 4th of July Tents, Tables, & Chairs 100 Quotes were received from the following: *Bolded low quote Apres Event Decor & Tent Rental - $29,396.25 Ultimate Events - $29,699.00 DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the low quote to Apres Event Decor & Tent Rental for $29,396.25 for the 2023 4th of July Celebration tents, tables, and chairs. ATTACHMENTS Apres Event Decor & Tent Rental quote Ultimate Events quote Quote comparisons 101 102 103 Apres Event Décor & Tent Rental Ultimate Events 80 X 130 Century Tent $7,545.25 $8,061.00 40 X 120 Century Tent $3,165.00 $3,300.00 10 X 10 Frame Tent $190.00 $236.00 15 X 60 Frame Tent $945.00 $1,199.00 10 X 20 Marquee Tent $300.00 $377.00 15X15 Frame Tent (9)$2,700.00 $3,086.00 8 X 20 Sidewalls (32)$1,120.00 $1,207.00 8 X 80 Sidewall $140.00 $151.00 7 X 40 Sidewall $70.00 $126.00 Light Kit LED 100 Watt (14)$770.00 $750.00 50' Extension Cords (28)$336.00 $327.00 Folding Chairs (2000) $3,900.00 $4,120.00 8' Tables (75)$971.25 $953.00 6' Tables (350)$4,462.50 $4,334.00 Delivery & Pick Up $750.00 $572.00 Tear Down (July 5) Labor $2,031.25 $900.00 Total $29,396.25 $29,699.00 Delivery & Pick Up Total Tents 2023 4th of July Tent Bids Lights and Cords Sidewalls Tables And Chairs Tear Down (July 5) Labor 104 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Approve Publication of Request For Qualifications for Civic Campus Architect Services File No.Item No: D.9 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Approves Publication of Request For Qualifications for Civic Campus Architect Services." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY BACKGROUND The city is requesting qualifications (RFQ) from firms to provide architectural and engineering services to the city for the Civic Campus project. See the attached presentation from March 13, 2023 meeting. Eight firms have been invited to respond to the RFQ based on their portfolio of similar work. The city intends to use a Construction Manager Agency (“CMA”) construction process. This process will utilize all public bidding requirements. The city intends to issue an RFQ for CMA services later this spring. The RFQ document is being prepared by the city's project consultant, HKGi, and will be added to the packet by end of business on Friday, March 17. 105 The City Council and staff project team intends to conduct interviews with 3-5 firms on Monday, May 1. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS March 13, 2023 Civic Campus City Council Work Session Presentation Chanhassen Civic Campus RFQ 106 CHANHASSEN CIVIC CAMPUS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MARCH 13, 2023 107 CHANHASSEN CIVIC CAMPUS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 3.13.2023 AGENDA • Background and Vision • Planning Process to Date • Schedule and Community Engagement 108 CHANHASSEN CIVIC CAMPUS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 3.13.2023 BACKGROUND • Built in 1981 • No longer serves the population of chanhassen • Significant deferred maintenence needs • Lacks operational efficiency EXISTING CITY HALL EXISTING CITY HALL FOOTPRINT 109 CHANHASSEN CIVIC CAMPUS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 3.13.2023 FACILITIES STUDY • Snow Kreilich Architects & Kraus Anderson ‘21-’22 • Evaluate current building conditions + project needs • Extensive cost for renovation • Based on cost differentials + ability to benefit the community, City Council decided to explore opportunities for a new Civic Campus including a City Hall, Sr. Center, and new park amenities as a community focal point BACKGROUND 110 CHANHASSEN CIVIC CAMPUS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 3.13.2023 [ • Invigorate Downtown Chanhassen • Provide community gathering spaces and amenities for all ages • Park Amenities Include: »Performance space »Universal Playground »Splash Pad »Farmers Market Area »Pickleball Courts VISION EXISTING CITY HALL FOOTPRINT PARKING DEVELOPMENT Calculated Parking Need: 137 for City Hall + 76 for Library (213 Total) Existing Parking Structure - Upper Level 93 Spaces Existing Parking Structure - Additional Spaces 5 Spaces Existing Parking Structure - Lower Level 26 Spaces Proposed Parking Under City Hall +/-40 Spaces Proposed Surface Parking for City Hall 97 Spaces Total 261 Spaces City Hall + Senior Center - 2 Story + Under Building Parking +/-17,000 SF Per Floor Community Room/Vending Space +/- 4,000 SF »New Skate Park »Convenient Parking »Heated Sidewalk Connection 111 CHANHASSEN CIVIC CAMPUS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 3.13.2023 PLANNING PROCESS TO DATEPARKS Splash Pad Accessible Playground Open Lawn Modern BathroomsImproved Skate Park Additional Pickleball Courts Performance Space New Senior Center CIVIC CAMPUS 2 Boardwalks New Trails LAKE ANN PRESERVE Complete Park Preserve Pedestrian Bridge 2+ Sheets of Ice Community Gathering Space Walking Track Field House/Athletic Turf PARK REFERENDUM TASK FORCE PRIORITIES CHANHASSENBLUFFS 112 CHANHASSEN CIVIC CAMPUS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 3.13.2023 PLANNING PROCESS TO DATE • Input & feedback provided by commisions and community groups »Preliminary Concepts (Fall 2022) »Joint Workshop with Commissions (Nov 2022) • Seeking additional public feedback to start design phase »Social Pinpoint Site »Online Survey »Open House & Facility Tours »City Council Listening Session 113 CHANHASSEN CIVIC CAMPUS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 3.13.2023 SCHEDULE & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Architecture RFP / RFQ Release Responses Due Interviews Selection / Contract Approval Kicko + Programming Phase MARCH APRIL MAY WINTER/SPRING 2023 KEY STEPS TASK 3/24 3/20 3/24 Review Project Approach Approve issuing the RFP Website Launch Open House City Council Involvement Community Engagement Open House/City Coucil Listening Session Develop Website + Online Engagement Summary of Public Engagement 4/21 4/20 4/24 3/21 5/1 5/1 5/8 5/8 5/23 Listening Session Contract approval for Arch Architect Interviews 3/13 114 CHANHASSEN CIVIC CAMPUS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 3.13.2023 SCHEDULE & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT S ‘24 F ‘24 W ‘25 SP ‘25 S ‘25 F ‘25 W ‘26 SP ‘26 S ‘26 F ‘26FEB ‘23 Bidding/Permitting/Lead Times Construction Start Substantial Completion New City Hall Building Move-In City Hall Ribbon Cutting Bidding/Permitting/Lead Times Ex. City Hall Demolition + Mobilization Construction Start Substantial Completion Ribbon Cutting MAR ‘23 APR ‘23 SUMMER ‘23 FALL ‘23 OCT-DEC ‘23 W ‘24 SP ‘24 (Prior to 4th of July Festival) 2023 TASKS 2024+ TASKS PRF Release Late Feb / Early Mar Community Engagement Online/Messaging - March Open house Tour - April Consolidate feedback by programming phase - May Interviews Early May Architect/ CM Select May / June / July Contract Approvals Programming May Geotechnical P1 + P2 May Schematic Design June / July / Aug Fully integrated bulding + site Design Development Aug / Sept / Oct Determine break point or site work w/P1 of construction Construction Documents Oct/Nov/Dec Building and site for Phase 1 PHASE 1 - New City Hall, Parking, Streetscape Preliminary Schedule PHASE 2 - Park Building + Amenities 115 CHANHASSEN CIVIC CAMPUS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 3.13.2023 THANK YOU! 116 Request for Qualifications Architectural and Engineering Services Chanhassen Civic Campus City Hall/Senior Center + Park Building and Park Improvements RFQ Issue Date: March 21, 2023 Submittal Due Date: April 21, 2023 117 Chanhassen Architecture and Engineering RFQ 2 General Information The City of Chanhassen (“City”) is seeking qualification submittals for architectural and engineering (“AE”) services for the Chanhassen Civic Campus. The project is a two-phase construction process that will span multiple years at the existing Civic Campus. The initial phase of improvements will provide a new City Hall & Senior Center building, supporting parking, streetscape, and plaza improvements. The second phase of construction involves the demolition of the existing City Hall building and the creation of a flagship park space for downtown Chanhassen. The selected firm will work with the City Council and City staff to determine the building programming, schematic design, design development, construction documentation, and construction administration services. Hoisington Koegler Group, inc. (HKGi) has been involved throughout the concept design phase, working with the City Council, Boards and Commissions, and City staff to develop the current concept for the Civic Campus. HKGi will provide landscape architecture services for all aspects of the project (programming through construction administration) and during both phases of construction. The City intends to utilize Construction Manager/Owners Representative to assist with preconstruction, procurement and construction management. The City intends to issue an RFQ for Construction Management services during the programming and schematic design phase. Project Timeline Request for Proposals issued via email March 21, 2023 Questions regarding the RFQ due prior to March 31, 2023, 12 p.m. Response to questions issued via email April 7, 2023 Submittal Deadline April 21, 2023, 12 p.m. Selected Consultant Interviews with City Council May 1, 2023 Contract for Programming & Schematic Design Approved May 8, 2023 Programming May – June 2023 Schematic Design June – July 2023 Design Development Aug – Oct 2023 Construction Documents Oct 2023 – Dec 2023/Jan 2024 Bidding Winter 2024 Phase 1 Construction Start May 2024 Phase 1 Construction Completion June 2025 Phase 2 Construction Start June 2025 Phase 2 Construction Completion July 2026 Questions & Inquiries All questions regarding this request for qualifications should be submitted by email before 12:00 p.m., April 21, 2023 and should be directed to: Laurie Hokkanen City Manager City of Chanhassen 952.227.1119 lhokkanen@chanhassenmn.gov 118 Chanhassen Architecture and Engineering RFQ 3 Project Background The City of Chanhassen seeks to revitalize its downtown Civic Campus. The project is comprised of a new City Hall, Council Chambers, Senior Center, and destination park amenities. Chanhassen’s current municipal building was built in 1981. The facility no longer serves the population of Chanhassen. The building has significant deferred maintenance needs and lacks operational efficiency. The reimagined Civic Campus (See Figure 1) is intended to invigorate Chanhassen’s downtown and provide community gathering spaces and numerous amenities. The current plan represents the city’s longstanding commitment to being a community for life, with amenities for all ages. The concept plan shows pickleball courts, a new skate park, a splash pad, a playground, a performance space, room for the Farmers Market, conveniently located parking, a heated sidewalk to facilitate movement between the Senior Center and Library, and more. A central park building with public restrooms, public meeting room, and storage is also proposed. The park building may also provide a concessionaire, however this will be determined in the programming phase. In 2021-22 a comprehensive Facility Study was completed by Snow Kreilich Architects and Kraus Anderson. The study provided an assessment of the current City Hall facility as well as other municipal buildings throughout the community. The Facility Study provided an assessment on the overall condition of the building and projected needs (See RFQ Supplemental Information below). In particular, the study helped the City Council understand the costs of refurbishing or replacing City Hall. City Hall was built in 1981, with significant projects in 1988, 1996, and 2004. Based on the cost differentials outlined in the Facility Study and ability to benefit the community, the City Council decided to explore opportunities to build a new City Hall within a new Civic Campus that would include a new City Hall/Senior Center, park building and various park amenities to create a new community focal point. The planning process to date has included numerous conversations with the City Council, Boards and Commissions and City staff. Past milestones leading to the current vision for the Civic Campus include: •September 2022 - HKGi presented five concepts for a reimagined City Hall and City Center Park area. Council and Commission members were able to review and provide feedback on the concepts and respond to survey questions. •January 2023 - HKGi shared feedback received at the September Joint Workshop and received additional input from the City Council to refine the concept plan. •February 2023 - HKGi presented a preferred concept plan based on feedback to date and provided preliminary cost estimate information for the project. RFQ Supplemental Information •Attachment A – Facilities Study (2021-22) •Attachment B – Civic Campus Preferred Concept – City Council Work Session Presentation (March 2023) •Attachment C – Preliminary Cost Estimate •Attachment D – City Standard Contract Click here to download supplemental information. Project Budget & Financing Based on the 2021 Facilities Study and recent master planning for the Civic Campus, the City of Chanhassen has identified a project budget range from $33-$35 million dollars for all aspects of the project and for both phases of construction. The City plans to issue General Obligation bonds to fund the Civic Campus project. 119 Chanhassen Architecture and Engineering RFQ 4 Scope of Work The City of Chanhassen is issuing this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) as the first step in identifying a firm to complete the full range of architectural and engineering services for the design and schematic cost estimating for the City Hall/Senior Center and supporting park building. The purpose of this RFQ is to identify quality A/E firms and select the firm(s) that are deemed best fit for this project. It is anticipated an initial contract for Programming and Schematic Design would be scoped and authorized as a first step to initiate the design process. This initial contract would follow the City of Chanhassen’s Standard Agreement for Consulting Services. Following the Schematic Design phase, it is anticipated a second contract for Design Development, Construction Documents, Bidding Assistance, and Construction Administration would be negotiated and authorized under an AIA Document B133-2019 Standard Form of Agreement. However, the City reserves the right to modify the standard form of agreement to include provisions consistent with City policies. The City will coordinate and provide necessary geotechnical needs. A comprehensive site survey has been authorized and will be available by or very soon after project initiation. Submittal Requirements The submissions should succinctly demonstrate firm’s ability to communicate the capabilities, knowledge, experience, and capacity of the respondent to meet the requirements of the project. The City of Chanhassen may, at its discretion, request additional information or clarification from any or all proposers and to allow for corrections of errors or omissions. Qualification submissions are to be organized in the general sequence as outlined below. Please limit the electronic qualifications response to twenty (20) 8 ½” x 11” single-sided printable sheets, minimum font size of 11 point (excludes front and back cover). Failure to include requested information, or follow the organizational requirements outlined below, will have a negative impact on the evaluation of the submittal. In order to be considered, all requested information below must be submitted: Cover Letter •Business name and address. •Contact name, address, phone, and email. •Brief statement outlining why the responding firms(s) should be considered for the work. Table of Contents •Include a clear identification of the material by section and page number. Firm(s) Description •Name, address, telephone number, e-mail address, website address. •Year the firm was established. •Number of employees in firm and office locations. •Indicate which person will be the contact for the RFQ process. •Lead Firm or Consultant specialties, including but not limited to Civil, Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical, and Structural: List of the type(s) of work the firm specializes in (note: Landscape Architecture services will be provided by HKGi under separate contract). Key Personnel: •Background and expertise of key personnel assigned to the project, including: ◦Identify the Project Manager (background and work on similar projects). ◦List specialty consultant leads and key personnel designated to the project by area of expertise. 120 Chanhassen Architecture and Engineering RFQ 5 »Provide a brief but detailed history of the number of years of experience with the current firm and other firms, education, professional. registration/certifications (LEED, AIA, PE, etc.), and qualified work experience relevant to the services requested. »Current/Prior experience with municipal projects with emphasis on City Hall, Senior Centers, and Park Buildings. »Experience of the team members working together on past projects. Firm Experience: •List at least five (5) projects, starting with the most recent, that the professional personnel of your firm have worked within the past 10 years. Provide the year the project was performed, the name of the municipality/jurisdiction and location (city), the owner’s name, address, and contact name and phone number, e-mail address and the scope of work performed. Other related experience may be included. Project Understanding & Approach: •Provide an overview of your firm’s understanding and approach to achieve the broader goals of the project. ◦Describe what distinguishes your company from others who may submit. ◦Describe what lessons you have learned from past projects to better inform this project’s success. ◦Describe your experience working with projects involving multiple phases of construction and staging during construction. ◦Provide information on special professional services your company will provide as a part of base services to enhance the project (virtual walk through, 3D modeling, etc.). ◦Identify staff who will be assigned to the project and confirm their availability for project schedule. ◦Describe your firm’s quality control measures or QA/QC process for projects of this nature. Selection Process •The selection committee will include representatives from the City Council and City staff. •The selection committee will review all submissions and select one or more firms for further consideration and possible interview. Interviews are tentatively scheduled for the evening of May 1. •Submissions will be ranked as follows: ◦Lead Firm Experience – 30% ◦Design Team Experience – 20% ◦Project Understanding and Approach – 40% ◦Quality and thoroughness of the Qualifications Submittal – 10% •Interviews will be ranked as follows: ◦Presentation of Firm Experience & Key Members – 20% ◦Presentation of Project Understanding and Approach – 25% ◦Response to Panel Questions – 25% ◦Qualifications of staff assigned to the project, including commitment to this project – 10% ◦Rapport with Panel – 20% DISCLAIMER: This Request for Qualifications is only a solicitation for information. The City of Chanhassen does intend, but is not obligated, to enter into a contract, nor is it responsible for any costs associated with the preparation of qualification submissions and interviews. Qualification submissions received after the deadline may be disqualified from consideration. The City reserves the right to reject any and all submissions and to interview firms which in the City’s judgment, will best meet the City’s needs. 121 Chanhassen Architecture and Engineering RFQ 6 Figure 1: Reimagined Civic Campus EXISTING CITY HALL FOOTPRINT [0 40 80 Feet Key Features •Build new City Hall building located near the intersection of W78th Street and Market Boulevard (2 Story with under building parking) •Develop new surface parking lots for City Hall and Civic Campus along the east side of site •Maintain existing parking lot/structure on west side of site •Create a 4 season park centrum building with adjacent performance/event plaza •Provide additional features including a universal playground, splash pad and gathering lawn •Retain existing Veteran’s Memorial and create an new associated plaza space for ceremonies •Retain and enhance the event lawn area and skate park on the north side of the site •Enhance connections from the west with a pedestrian crossing signal of Kerber Blvd. and plaza paving courtyard at the library entry •Create a strong civic presence along W78th Street with a linear plaza and entry signage 122 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Award Contract for 2023 Pothole Patching File No.N/A Item No: D.10 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Alison Albrecht, Public Works Support Specialist Reviewed By Charlie Burke SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council awards a not-to-exceed contract of $50,000 to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. for 2023 pothole patching." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Every year, the city must perform pothole patching on our bituminous streets as a maintenance activity in order to provide a level of service expected by our citizens and other traveling public. The amount of patching work is directly proportional to the Overall Condition Index (OCI) of our street network. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION The use of a contractor to supplement the city's self-performed pothole patching work began in 2020, with great cost effectiveness and timeliness of completion. Northwest Asphalt was the contractor we utilized previously, and they performed the services to our satisfaction. BUDGET 123 The Streets Division of the Public Works Department solicited quotes for a daily rate for performing pothole patching based on completing repairs on the streets as shown on the attached map. Three (3) quotes were returned, as summarized below. Northwest Asphalt was the low quote. Contractor Quote Northwest Asphalt, Inc.$5,736/Day + $112/Ton of Mix Bituminous Roadways, Inc.$6,722/Day + $98/Ton of Mix GMH Asphalt Corporation $8,240/Day + $135/Ton of Mix RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends awarding the 2023 pothole patching contract to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. ATTACHMENTS Contract Project Map 124 1 175881v1 FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND CONTRACTOR FOR 2023 POTHOLE PATCHING THIS AGREEMENT, made this 13th day of March, 2023, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Owner”) and NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC. (“Contractor”). Owner and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents”, all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement; B. Request for quotes, email dated February 14, 2023; C. City of Chanhassen General Conditions of the Construction Contract; D. Current edition of City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. E. Quote/Bid dated February 14, 2023. In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “D” having the last priority. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. CONTRACT PRICE. Owner shall pay Contractor for completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents a Not-To-Exceed amount of Fifty Thousand and 00/100 dollars ($50,000.00). 4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES. A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment. Applications for Payment will be processed by Engineer as provided in the General Conditions. B. Progress Payments; Retainage. Owner shall make 95% progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment during performance of the Work. DocuSign Envelope ID: 66525A85-B070-42AE-82F4-7E0479D2E856 125 2 175881v1 C. Payments to Subcontractor. (1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1 ½ percent per month or any part of a month to the Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. (2) Form IC-134 (attached) required from general contractor. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Chanhassen obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of Revenue for approval. The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid. D. Final Payment. Upon final completion of the Work, Owner shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by Engineer. 5. COMPLETION DATE A. The Work must be completed and ready for final payment in accordance with the General Conditions by July 31, 2023. 6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. DocuSign Envelope ID: 66525A85-B070-42AE-82F4-7E0479D2E856 126 3 175881v1 D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the General Conditions and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the site. E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding Documents, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by Owner and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. Contractor has given Engineer written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by Engineer is acceptable to Contractor. J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. K. Subcontracts: DocuSign Envelope ID: 66525A85-B070-42AE-82F4-7E0479D2E856 127 4 175881v1 (1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, upon receipt of the executed Contract Documents, submit in writing to the Owner the names of the Subcontractors proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request or with the consent of the Owner. (2) The Contractor is responsible to the Owner for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's subcontractors, and of their direct and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's employees. (3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between the Owner, the Engineer, and any Subcontractor. (4) The Contractor shall bind every Subcontractor by the terms of the Contract Documents. 7. WORKER’S COMPENSATION. The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY. Contractor shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage and maintain it at all times throughout the life of the Contract, with the City included as an additional name insured on a primary and non- contributory basis. The Contractor shall furnish the City a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the required coverage: Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Contractual Liability (identifying the contract): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Personal Injury, with Employment Exclusion deleted: $2,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non-owned, hired): DocuSign Envelope ID: 66525A85-B070-42AE-82F4-7E0479D2E856 128 5 175881v1 Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence 9. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the quote shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications. 10. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a result of any such claims. 11. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General Conditions. B. Owner and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon Owner and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provisions. D. Data Practices/Records. (1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. DocuSign Envelope ID: 66525A85-B070-42AE-82F4-7E0479D2E856 129 6 175881v1 (2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices to the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. E. Software License. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Contract contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. F. Patented devices, materials and processes. If the Contract requires, or the Contractor desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Contractor shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the Owner. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the Project agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the Owner for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement G. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. H. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. I. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Contract. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County. J. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Contract is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Contract, unless such invalid or DocuSign Envelope ID: 66525A85-B070-42AE-82F4-7E0479D2E856 130 7 175881v1 unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Contract impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties’ entire contract. K. Entire Agreement. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. L. Permits and Licenses; Rights-of-Way and Easements. The Contractor shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees therefore, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the construction and completion of the Project. The City will obtain all necessary rights-of- way and easements. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for any construction delay resulting from the City’s not timely obtaining rights-of-way or easements. M. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the action or inaction of the Owner, the Contractor shall be allowed a time extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other compensation. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CONTRACTOR: BY: BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor Its BY: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager DocuSign Envelope ID: 66525A85-B070-42AE-82F4-7E0479D2E856 project manager 131 DocuSign Envelope ID: 66525A85-B070-42AE-82F4-7E0479D2E856 132 133 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Accept Proposal and Award Professional Service Agreement for the 2023 Annual Pavement Inspection and Condition Rating Services File No.PW425 Item No: D.11 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council awards a professional service contract for the 2023 Annual Pavement Inspection and Condition Rating Services contract to Braun Intertec Corporation in the amount of $28,036.00." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY BACKGROUND The City of Chanhassen owns and maintains approximately 115 miles of public streets, 64 miles of trails, and 30 parking lots. The city is broken down into three geographic sections which get inspected on a rotating annual basis, meaning every three years each public street, trail, and parking lot is inspected and evaluated. The city hires a consultant to augment staff resources and perform this analysis and input the information into the city's asset management software, Cartegraph OMS. Area 2 is the subject area for 2023. A map of each area is attached to this report. DISCUSSION 134 The following is the schedule for the project: RFP Released February 13, 2023 Proposals Due March 3, 2023 Contract Award March 20, 2023 Initial Inspection Completion August 4, 2023 Draft Memo August 18, 2023 Project Completion By September 4, 2023 BUDGET City staff solicited proposals from interested firms. On March 3, 2023, two proposals were received. The budget for the contract was set at $30,000. Proposal amounts for the project are shown below: PROPOSER TOTAL Braun Intertec Corporation $28,036.00 WSB $28,460.00 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends awarding Braun Intertec Corporation the professional services contract. ATTACHMENTS Annual Pavement Survey Areas Braun Intertec Professional Services Agreement Braun Intertec Certificate of Insurance 135 Lake Virginia Christmas Lake Lotus Lake Brendan Pond Lake Harrison Kerber Pond Lake Susan Rice Marsh Lake Lake Riley Rice Lake Lake St. Joe Lake Minnewashta Lake Ann Lake Lucy ST18 ST14 ST15 ST17 ST61 SA5 SA7 SA41 SA101 SA41 SA5 Minnewashta Regional Park North Lotus Lake Park Meadow Green Park Lake Ann Park Chanhassen Pond Park Chanhassen Nature Preserve Chanhassen Recreation Center Lake Susan Park Rice Marsh Lake Preserve Power Hill Park Fox Woods Preserve Bandimere Community Park Bluff Creek Golf Course Hesse Farm Park Preserve Lake Susan Preserve Raguet Wildlife Management Are MN Valley National Wildlife Re MN Landscape Arboretum Seminary Fen Scientific & Nat* Bluff Creek Preserve Independent School District 11 Independent School District 112 Independent School District 276 Riley Ridge Park Lake Ann Park Preserve )212 Lake Lucy Rd AudubonRdPowersBlvdHw y212LymanBl vdChanhassen RdArboretum Blvd Pioneer TrlHazeltineBlvd Hwy 212Marke tBlvdGalpinBlvdPowers BlvdHwy 7Hwy 7 F ly in g C l o u d D r Great P lain s BlvdArb o r e t u m B l v d C o R d 1 0 1 ST101 ST101 GH117 Date Created: 2/10/2023 Document Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\Pavement\PavementSurveyAreas.aprxCreated By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 3,000 Feet 0 0.5 Mile Annual Pavement Survey Area City of Chanhassen Legend Local Streets Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Other Highways/Roads US Highway MN Highway County Road Private Road Parking Lots 2 1 3 1 42.1 13.1 11 2 39.2 20.9 9 3 35.5 31.7 10 Area Road Miles Trail Miles # of Parking Lots 136 1 201749v1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 20th day of March, 2023, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN,a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION, A Minnesota corporation ("Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1.SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant for2023 Pavement Inspection and Condition Rating Services. 2.CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A.This Professional Services Agreement; B.Insurance Certificate; C. Request for Proposals (“RFP) dated February 13, 2023 D.Consultant’s March 1, 2023 proposal (“Proposal”). In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts, with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “D” having the last priority. 3.COMPENSATION. Consultant shall be paid by the City for the services described in the Proposal a not to exceed fee of Twenty Eight Thousand and Thirty Six Dollars ($28,036.00), inclusive of expenses. Services performed directly by Consultant shall be paid at an hourly rate in accordance with the Proposal, subject to the not to exceed fee. The not to exceed fees and expenses shall not be adjusted if the estimated hours to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. Consultant shall bill the City as the work progresses. Payment shall be made by the City within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of an invoice. 4.DOCUMENT OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City for use solely with respect to the Scope of Services. The City may use the information for its purposes. Such documents prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by the City on extensions or modifications of the Scope of Services or on any other project. Any such reuse without written verification or adaptation by 137 2 201749v1 Consultant for the specific purpose intended will be at the City’s risk, and the City agrees to hold Consultant harmless as to all costs and liability arising out of such unauthorized use. 5.CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 6.COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 7.STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 8.INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and reasonable attorney's fees, to the comparative extent they are caused by the negligent acts or omissions of Consultant or those for whom Consultant is legally responsible. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, neither party hereto shall be responsible or held liable to the other for punitive, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, or liability for loss of use, loss of business opportunity, loss of profit or revenue, loss of product or output, or business interruption. 9.INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit Professional Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy on a primary and non- contributory basis. Before commencing work, the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 10.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this 138 3 201749v1 Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 11.SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statutes § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractors for all undisputed services provided by subcontractors within ten (10) days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of one and five-tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to subcontractors on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractors. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or more is Ten Dollars ($10.00). 12.CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County Minnesota. 13.MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14.COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15.PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and 139 4 201749v1 hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 16.RECORDS. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records of hours worked and expenses involved in the performance of services. 17.ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 18.WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 19.ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 20.TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall be obligated to the Consultant for payment of amounts due and owing including payment for services performed or furnished to the date and time of termination. 21.LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Consultant’s aggregate liability for all claims, including its defense obligation, is limited to the lesser of those damages actually incurred and paid as a result of Consultant’s negligence, or the amounts of insurance required herein. Dated: _______________, 2023.CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: _____________________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor BY: _____________________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Dated: _______________, 2023.BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 140 5 201749v1 BY: _____________________________________________ ___________________ Its ________________________ 141 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER F : INSURER E : INSURER D : INSURER C : INSURER B : INSURER A : NAIC # NAME:CONTACT (A/C, No):FAX E-MAILADDRESS: PRODUCER (A/C, No, Ext):PHONE INSURED REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. OTHER: (Per accident) (Ea accident) $ $ N / A SUBR WVD ADDL INSD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $ $ $ $PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY (Per accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AUTOS ONLY AUTOSAUTOS ONLY NON-OWNED SCHEDULEDOWNED ANY AUTO AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below If yes, describe under ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE $ $ $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT EROTH-STATUTEPER LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY)POLICY EFFPOLICY NUMBERTYPE OF INSURANCELTRINSR DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) EXCESS LIAB UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE $AGGREGATE $ OCCUR CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $ $PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $GENERAL AGGREGATE $PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $MED EXP (Any one person) $EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO-JECT LOC CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) CANCELLATION AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. CERTIFICATE HOLDER The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD HIRED AUTOS ONLY 3/9/2023 Osborne &Associates 420 Gateway Blvd Burnsville MN 55337 Certificates Department 952-707-8200 952-890-0535 Certificates@kainsurance.com The Phoenix Insurance Company 25623 BRAUINT-01 Travelers Property Casualty Co 25674BraunIntertecCorporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis MN 55438 Amerisure Partners Insurance C 11050 Continental Casualty Company 20443 539455763 A X 1,000,000 X 300,000 X XCU;BFPD 10,000 X Contractual Liab 1,000,000 2,000,000 X X Y 6608N681669 9/1/2022 9/1/2023 2,000,000 B 1,000,000 X 8109N171016 9/1/2022 9/1/2023 B X X 14,000,000CUP8N7079789/1/2022 9/1/2023 14,000,000 X 10,000 C X N WC 2112784 03 05 9/1/2022 9/1/2023 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 D Professional Liability -Incl. Pollution Incident -Claims Made &Reported EEH114132066 9/1/2022 9/1/2023 Each Claim Aggregate Retention 10,000,000 10,000,000 500,000 RE:QTB172994;City of Chanhassen Annual Pavement Inspection and Condition Rating Services The Certificate Holder is an Additional Insured under the Commercial General Liability on a Primary/Non-Contributory Basis when required by written contract. City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen MN 142 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Resolution 2023-XX: Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for the 2023 City Pavement Mill & Overlay Project No. 23-04 File No.ENG Project No. 23-04 CIP No. ST-012 Item No: D.12 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizing publication of an advertisement for bids for the 2023 City Mill & Overlay Project No. 23-04." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Approve the construction documents and authorize an advertisement to bid the project. BACKGROUND As part of the overall Pavement Management Program (PMP), the city annually plans to rehabilitate a section or sections of public streets across the city. The five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) identifies the near-term streets for rehabilitation. The proposed 2023 Mill & Overlay project (#23-04) includes the mill and overlay of approximately 0.3 miles of existing residential streets in the following three neighborhoods: 143 Sunridge Court Oakside Circle Creekwood Drive This is in addition to the larger 2023 Street Improvement project (#23-01). The projects are separated in an attempt to reduce overall project costs. The Mill & Overlay project is on streets that have no existing sewer and water utilities, and the proposed work is merely to perform a maintenance task for the pavement itself without associated ancillary work typical on the larger rehabilitation projects. On January 23, 2023, the City Council accepted the Feasibility Study and called this public hearing. On February 1, 2023, the Engineering Department hosted an open house relative to the project areas to gain feedback before this Public Hearing meeting. No property owners attended the February 1st meeting. On February 13, 2023, the City Council conducted a Public Hearing (known as the Improvement Hearing) and authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for the project. DISCUSSION The proposed 2023 Mill & Overlay project (#23-04) includes the mill and overlay of approximately 0.3 miles of existing residential streets in the following three neighborhoods: Sunridge Court, Oakside Circle and Creekwood Drive. The street segments within the proposed project were identified by the city’s pavement management software in conjunction with site investigation. The proposed improvements generally consist of milling two inches of the bituminous pavement surface and overlaying two inches of new bituminous surface, removal and replacement of severe pavement distresses, and minor drainage improvements within one project area (Creekwood Drive). Sunridge Court: Sunridge Court is 0.1 miles and was originally constructed in 1988 when the area developed with the Sun Ridge plat, approved in 1987. Sealcoats were performed in 1992, 1998, and 2011 along with regular street maintenance activities such as pothole patching. The street is not considered an urbanized section as curb and gutter and associated stormwater drainage systems were not installed with the original construction. In 1990, SWMP Project #19-90-08 installed a catch basin at the end of the cul-de-sac as well as bituminous curb to address drainage issues. In 1998, public sanitary sewer and water mains were extended from the development to the north, Bluff Creek Estates 4th Addition, to service 1851 Sunridge Court. The sanitary sewer was extended south within the backyards of 1851 and 1861 Sunridge Court, while the water main was brought to the cul-de-sac located at the end of Sunridge Court. These utility extensions can facilitate future extensions as identified in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan when petitioned by the residents of Sunridge Court. Oakside Circle: Oakside Circle is 0.1 miles and was originally constructed in 1984 when the area was developed with the Hillside Oaks plat, approved in 1984. Sealcoats were performed in 1992, 1997, and 2005 along with regular street maintenance activities such as pothole patching. The street is not considered an urbanized section as curb and gutter and associated stormwater drainage systems were not installed with the original construction. In 1993, SAP 10-617-14 constructed street improvements along Powers Boulevard from TH 5 to Lyman Boulevard, which included urbanizing the corridor (curb, gutter, and storm sewer improvements), constructing a bituminous walk, and other utility improvements. This project also installed sanitary sewer and water main stubs to Oakside Circle to facilitate future extensions as identified in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan when petitioned by the residents of Oakside Circle. Creekwood Drive : Creekwood Drive is 0.1 miles and was originally constructed in 1973. Sealcoats were performed in 1992 and 2005 with a mill and overlay conducted in 1996. Regular street maintenance activities such as pothole patching have also occurred throughout the years. The street was 144 not originally constructed as an urbanized section as curb and gutter and associated stormwater drainage systems were not installed; however, with the TH 101 project completed in 2021, approximately 370 feet of Creekwood Drive from the intersection of TH 101 west was upgraded to an urbanized section as well as sanitary sewer and water mains stubbed for future extension. In 2019 the city conducted emergency street repairs to a 190-foot section of Creekwood Drive which became impassable due to the age of the road, underlying soils, and frost heaving. All areas were identified by the city's pavement management software in conjunction with site investigations as needing rehabilitation. The proposed mill and overlay for all areas proposed will improve the condition of the pavement and is found to be feasible, necessary and cost-effective. Public Engagement Summary Engineering distributed a survey to the 11 assessable properties along the streets being rehabilitated by the project. None of the surveys were returned. The project also hosted an open house on February 1, 2023, at the Chanhassen Library. None of the property owners or anyone from the public attended the open house related to the Mill & Overlay project. Lastly, no emails or other correspondence have been received since the formal letter went out to the property owners identifying the preliminary assessment amount and notification of the Public Hearing. The remaining project schedule is as follows: Bidding - March/April 2023 Bid Date - April 14, 2023 2nd Neighborhood Meeting - May 2, 2023 Conduct Assessment Hearing and Award Project - May 2023 Begin Construction - June 2023 End Construction (Substantial Completion) - October 2023 BUDGET The estimated cost for the proposed improvements are $101,922.61. The street costs include a 5% construction cost contingency. A summary of the estimated project area costs and funding sources are as follows: Project Area Total Street Costs 60% City Cost 40% Assessed Est. Assessment Sunridge Court $48,252.01 $28,951.21 $19,300.80 $3,900 Oakside Circle $29,558.75 $17,735.25 $11,823.50 $3,000 Creekwood Drive $24,111.86 $14,467.11 $9,644.75 Varies* TOTAL $101,922.61 61,153.57 $40,769.04 A portion of the proposed improvements are to be paid by special assessments to the benefitting properties and the remainder will be funded by the City's Pavement Management Program (PMP) Fund in accordance with the city’s Assessment Policy, attached to this report. Benefitting properties within the project area are proposed to be assessed 40% of the street improvement costs; the remaining project costs will be funded by the city PMP funds. The CIP project sheet is attached to this report. *The city typically calculates assessments per unit, but due to the Bluff Creek Golf Course and its percentage of traffic generated, an area assessment formula was utilized for Creekwood Drive. 145 All of these costs are estimates. Final assessment amounts will be determined based on the actual bid pricing received. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends city council adopt a resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement to bid for City Project Number 23-04. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Streets 5-Year CIP Map (2023-2027) Assessment Policy CIP ST-012 (2023) 23-04 Plans & Specifications (Bid Package) 146 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: March 20, 2023 RESOLUTION NO:2023-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2023 MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT NO. 23-04 WHEREAS,on February13, 2023, the City Council held a Public Hearing for the 2023 Mill & Overlay Project No. 23-04; and WHEREAS,pursuant to the Resolution passed by the City Council on February13, 2023; the City has prepared plans and specifications for the 2023 Mill & OverlayProject and has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for approval. The project area includes the following streets: the improvement of Sunridge Court, Oakside Circle, and Creekwood Drive. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe Chanhassen City Council: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which can be reviewed at the office of the City Engineer, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official city newspaper and on QuestCDN.com, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published at least three times, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Engineering Department at City Hall until 2:00 p.m. on April 21, 2023, at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud by the Project Engineer. Bids will be tabulated, and the responsibility of the bidders will be considered by the Council at 7:00 PM on Monday, May8, 2023, for the 2023Mill & Overlay Project No. 23-04, in the Council Chambers at City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless appropriately submitted online and accompanied by a bid security payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 20th day of March, 2023. ATTEST: Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 147 ###################################################### ###############################################################################################Lake Virginia Christmas Lake Lotus Lake Brendan Pond Lake Harrison Kerber Pond Lake Susan Rice Marsh Lake Lake Riley Rice Lake Lake St. Joe Lake Minnewashta Lake Ann Lake Lucy ST18 ST15 ST14 ST17 ST61 Minnewashta Regional Park North Lotus Lake Park Meadow Green Park Lake Ann Park Chanhassen Pond Park Chanhassen Nature Preserve Chanhassen Recreation Center Lake Susan Park Rice Marsh Lake Preserve Power Hill Park Fox Woods Preserve Bandimere Community Park Bluff Creek Golf Course Hesse Farm Park Preserve Lake Susan Preserve Raguet Wildlife Management Are MN Valley National Wildlife Re MN Landscape Arboretum Seminary Fen Scientific & Nat* Bluff Creek Preserve Independent School District 11 Independent School District 112 Independent School District 276 Riley Ridge Park Lake Ann Park Preserve SA5 SA7 SA101 SA41 SA5 )212 C C C C C Powers BlvdH w y212AudubonRdLyman Blvd Chanhassen RdA r b o r e t u m Blvd Pioneer Trl A r boretum Blvd GalpinBlvdHwy 212HazeltineBlvdMarketBlvdHwy 7 GreatPlainsB lvdFlying C l o u d D r C o R d 1 0 1 ST101 GH117 S S M M M M M M M M M Date Created: 7/25/2022 Document Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\CIP\2023-2027\CIP_5Year_2023-2027.aprxCreated By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 3,000 Feet 0 0.5 Mile 5-Year CIP Pavement Management Plan (PMP) - Streets (2023-2027) City of Chanhassen Legend 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Mill & Overlay Full Depth Reclamation ##Reconstruction S State/MnDOT Project C County Project M Municipal State Aid 148 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ASSESSMENT POLICY Last updated January 2022 The City of Chanhassen’s Assessment Policy is intended to provide general direction to City Staff and their consultants in preparation of assessment rolls to ensure fair and consistent treatment of all properties within the City that are subject to an assessment. This document will also be used to educate and explain to property owners about the Policy. All assessments shall follow the process outlined in Minnesota State Statues, Chapter 429, which gives the City the legal authority to assess property. This Policy may not apply in all circumstances, at which time the City Council may direct staff to determine an alternate assessment methodology. All benefiting properties that currently have access, or may have future access, to the public street being reconstructed or rehabilitated shall be included in the assessment roll. This includes property with a shared driveway or private street access to the public street, except where said private street meets applicable criteria to allow for a reduced or no assessment. Applicable criteria includes whether the private street has standard street width, section, and turn-around. There are various ways to calculate assessments, typically done based on the number of parcels, an area, or linear foot calculation. The City shall use the calculation method that creates a reasonable distribution of assessments across the entire roll. When more than one “neighborhood” is contained within the same project, the assessment shall be calculated per each neighborhood, rather than the total project. Public property, private associations, and non-profits will be included in the calculations. Commercial, Medium, and High Density Residential property shall be assessed based on a reasonable determination of vehicular traffic generated. NEW CONSTRUCTION: 100% assessed to all benefitting properties. New construction is typically paid for by the development itself and therefore not formally assessed. In some instances, the City will undertake proactive installation of public utilities to unserved areas and then assess the benefiting properties for the added service. In other instances properties may petition the City directly for the installation of the public improvement. Assessable Costs Include: • Construction of a new public street, trail and/or sidewalk. • Installation of public water main, storm sewer and/or sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances (structures, valves, hydrants, lift stations, etc.), where it did not previously exist. • Indirect costs (design, legal, and administration fees). Notes: • Oversizing of streets and utilities beyond what is needed for the development itself, are paid for by the City and are typically not assessed. RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION: 40% assessed to all benefitting properties Assessable Costs Include: • Pavement associated with public streets, trails and/or sidewalks. This includes draintile, geotechnical (soil corrections, etc.), and other improvements needed to support the function of the pavement structure. • Curb and gutter, including curb impacted solely by utility improvements. • Driveway pavement directly affected by the project work. • Multi-Modal improvements such as ADA ramps and actuated pedestrian crossings such as Rectangular Rapid- Flashing Beacons (RRFB’s). 149 Page 2 of 2 • Signing and stripping. • Retaining walls required within the Right-of-Way. • Tree removal and/or landscaping improvements directly affected by the project work. • Applicable percentage of indirect costs (design, legal, and admin fees). Notes: • Rehabilitation is typically defined as mill and overlay and/or full depth reclamation activities. • If a residential property benefits from a collector street, the assessment amount shall be based on an equitable formula compared to a typical local roadway, including normalizing to a 31-foot wide street, street section, and other applicable factors. • Pavement projects on streets that provide direct access to Chanhassen property(s) that are being implemented by an adjacent municipality shall not be assessed to the Chanhassen property(s) unless the adjacent municipality is assessing the benefitting property in their jurisdiction as part of the project. • Replacement or repair of existing public water main, storm sewer and/or sanitary sewer shall not be assessed. The City will pay 100% of these improvement costs out of the associated enterprise fund. REGULAR MAINTENANCE: Benefiting properties are not assessed • Activities Include: Pavement patching, pothole filling, crack sealing, chip sealing, sealcoating, and re-stripping. ASSESSMENT PAYMENT OPTIONS • Assessments can be paid in full up front with no charge, or added to annual property taxes with interest. • If elected to be added to annual property taxes, the balance can be paid off at any time during the term if later requested by the property owner. • Interest will be charged to property owners who choose to not pay their assessments in full by November 15th in the year the special assessment is levied. The interest rate will be equal to the average interest cost of the City’s most recent bond issue plus 2%. If the City has not issued bonds in the past year, the City will use the current municipal bond index rate for AAA rated issuers at the time the special assessment is approved. • Unless approved otherwise by the City Council, the maximum financing term for assessments shall be as follows: o $0-$500 1 year o $501-$2,500 5 years o $2,501-$5,000 8 years o $5,001 and above 10 years The City has developed a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document addressing the most common questions concerning assessments. The FAQ document can be found on the City’s website. 150 G:\ENG\Assessments\Assessment FAQ 2022 Update - Clean.docx Page 1 of 2 What are assessments? Assessments are charges to benefiting properties utilized to help finance an improvement project. In Chanhassen and most metro area cities, assessments are used to help finance street reconstruction and rehabilitation projects. These projects are programmed via the Pavement Management Program (PMP). Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 429, allows the City the authority to assess for projects. Who is assessed for a street improvement project? Owners of property that directly access a public street, or that have a private driveway that has access to a public street, or that have potential future access within the project area are assessed. These properties are determined to be “benefitting properties” and are assessed a cost based on the City’s Assessment Policy. Does the City have an Assessment Policy? Yes. It can be found on the City’s website at this location: https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/432/Assessment-Policy The City started assessing for street improvements in 1993. The Policy was last updated in January 2022. For the construction of a new public streets or public utilities, 100% of the cost is assessed to the benefitting properties. For an improvement project of an existing street, 40% of the cost is assessed to the benefitting properties and the City pays 60% of the street improvement cost. 100% of the public storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main costs associated with the project are paid by the associated utility enterprise funds and are not included in the cost assessed to the benefitting properties. Why does the City assess for street improvement projects? Why doesn’t the City pay 100% of the project cost? Public streets are part of the City’s Multi-Modal transportation system to provide access to all residents. The City acknowledges the system benefit of a street project by paying 60% of the project cost. Benefitting properties use the roads to get to and from their property on a daily basis, which is why they are assessed 40% of the street project cost. When someone buys a new home in a new subdivision, the cost to construct the new infrastructure was incorporated into the purchase price of the home and property by the Developer and thus was the initial assessment to the property. When is the assessment amount determined? An estimate of the assessment is calculated with the Feasibility Study, which is typically completed six months to a year before a project begins. The final assessment amount is based on the lowest responsible bid amount and is set by City Council at the assessment hearing, CITY OF CHANHASSEN FAQs: ASSESSMENTS 151 G:\ENG\Assessments\Assessment FAQ 2022 Update - Clean.docx Page 2 of 2 which typically occurs in April or May of the construction year. Properties being assessed for the project are notified of the assessment hearing formally by US mail, but the process is also communicated by the City via its website, public open houses, the Chanhassen Connection, social media, and at City Council meetings. What are the payment options for assessments? Please refer to the timeline below for payment options. The City does not accept partial payments of the assessment. Assessment Hearing & final assessment amount is determined and the Assessment Roll is adopted Payments received by this date are not charged interest Payments received by this date are charged the interest that has accrued from the date the Assessment Roll is adopted Annual payments to the assessment are paid with your property taxes. Interest is collected each year based on the outstanding principle owed on the assessment April or May (typically) 90 days after the Assessment Roll is adopted End of the year Term of the assessment* *You can pay off an assessment after it has been certified to your property taxes. The City of Chanhassen Finance Department will calculate the payoff amount, which will include the interest. The Term is based on a tiered amount found in the Policy. Why does the City charge interest on assessments? The City finances the entire project cost until all the assessments have been paid. The interest charged on assessments is the rate the City pays for the bonding (as of the date of the assessment) plus 2%. The interest charged is calculated as simple interest and not a compound interest. Benefitting property owners are encouraged to consult private financial institutions for other ways that can be used to pay off the assessment. This allows the property owner the ability to negotiate the term and interest rates within the competitive market and may have some tax advantages. What does the Franchise Fees Pay for? The Franchise Fees (passed in 2018) help pay for the City’s cost of the project. In lieu of Franchise Fees, the annual property tax levy would have to be adjusted to fund the overall Pavement Management Program (PMP). How can I provide input on the project and the planned improvements? A couple ways: 1. The City and their design consultants typically hold 2 public open houses during the project implementation process. You can attend one or both of these and verbally discuss the project or provide written comments on a comment card at those meetings. 2. Call the City’s Engineering Department at (952) 227-1160 and talk to one of the staff working on the project. 3. E-mail the City’s Engineering Department at Engineering@ci.chanhassen.mn.us and provide your comments or concerns. 152 Streets - 2023 Street Improvements Overview Request Owner Charlie Howley, PW Director/City Engineer Department Annual Pvmnt Mgmt Contracted Type Capital Improvement Project Number ST-012-2023 Description The 5-year Capital Pavement Management Plan (PMP) identies the planned streets for the next ve years. The Plan is updated every fall to revi ew priorities and needs, but generally i ntends to keep the overal l condition index (OCI) average across all streets at 70 or hi gher. The Ci ty uses a Pavement Management System in Cartegraph to moni tor the condition of City streets. While proper preventative maintenance extends the l ife of the street and is cost effective, a street wil l eventually deteriorate to a point that major maintenance is required. Rehabili tation projects exi ted the li fe of the street. In cases when util ities or poor subgrade needs to be repl aced or where streets have deteriorated to a point where rehabil itati on will no longer be practical , reconstructi on of the street i s necessary. A feasibili ty study i s wri tten to consider the merits of the project, scope of work, costs, and assessments. The Ci ty has an Assessment Pol icy that i denti es what and how much of the project is assessed to beneting properti es. Details Type of Project Resurface Current Road 153 Capital Cost Breakdown Capital Cost FY20 23 Total Engineering $450,000 $450,000 Construction/Maintenance $5,880,000 $5,880,000 Total $6,330,0 00 $6,330,0 00 Capital Cost FY2023 Budget $6,330,000 Total Budget (all years) $6.33M Project Total $6.33M Capital Cost by Year Construction/Maintenance Engineering 2023 $6,330,000.00 $0 $2M $4M $6M Capital Cost for Budgeted Years TOTAL $6,330,000.00 Construction/Maintenance (93%)$5,880,000.0 Engineering (7%)$450,000.00 154 Funding Sources Breakdown Funding Sources FY2023 Total Streets - PMP Funds $2,778,000 $2,778,000 Streets - PMP Assessmen ts $1,852,000 $1,852,000 Utility Fund - Water $700,000 $700,000 Utility Fund - Sewer $250,000 $250,000 Utility Fund - SW Mgmt $750,000 $750,000 Total $6,330,000 $6,330,000 Funding Sources FY2023 Budget $6,330,000 Total Budget (all years) $6.33M Project Total $6.33M Funding Sources by Year Streets - PMP Assessments Streets - PMP Funds Utility Fund - Sewer Utility Fund - SW Mgmt Utility Fund - Water 2023 $6,330,000.00 $0 $2M $4M $6M Funding Sources for Budgeted Years TOTAL $6,330,000.00 Streets - PMP Assessments (29%)$1,852,000.0 Streets - PMP Funds (44%)$2,778,000.00 U tility Fund - Sewer (4%)$250,000.00 U tility Fund - SW Mgmt (12%)$750,000.00 U tility Fund - Water (11%)$700,000.00 155 SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2023 Mill & Overlay Project CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 23-04 156 2023 MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT PROJECT NO. 23-04 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Color Table of Contents White Bidding Documents White Advertisement for Bids Instructions to Bidders Bid Form Agreement White Special Provisions to Specifications Yellow Plans and Specifications 2023 General Conditions & Contract Documents Green 2023 Street Specifications Pink 2023 Mill & Overlay Plans & Typical Sections White Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration White I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________________ Erik R. Henricksen, P.E. Date: _____3/20/2023___________ Lic. No. 59414 157 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Sealed bids will be received by the Engineering Department at the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota in the City Hall at 7700 Market Boulevard, until 2:00 PM, C.S.T. Friday, April 21, 2023, at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud for the furnishing of all labor, materials and appurtenances necessary for the following: 2023 MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT NO. 23-04 In general the work consists of the following approximate quantities: 4300 SY Mill Bituminous Surface (Full Depth) 1350 SY Mill Bituminous Surface (1.5”) 482 TON Type SP 9.5 Wearing Course Mix (3, C) 370 TON Type SP 12.5 Non Wearing Course Mix (3, C) 240 CY Aggregate Base Class 5 (CV) 120 CY Stabilizing Aggregate 3”-0 (CV) Complete digital project bidding documents are available at www.questcdn.com. Digital plan documents may be downloaded for $20.00 by inputting Quest Project #8419409 on the website’s Project Search page. For assistance and free membership registration, contact QuestCDN at 952-233-1632 or info@questcdn.com. Contractors may examine plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317. Please contact Erik Henricksen at 952-227-1165 or ehenricksen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us with any questions. Bid Security in the amount of five percent (5%) of the amount of the Bid must accompany each Bid in accordance with the Instructions to Bidders. The OWNER reserves the right to retain the deposits of the three lowest bidders for a period not to exceed 60 days after the date and time set for the opening of bids. No bids may be withdrawn for a period of 60 days after the date and time set for the opening of bids. The OWNER reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive irregularities and informalities therein and further reserves the right to award the Contract to the best interests of the OWNER. It is anticipated that the bids will be considered by the Chanhassen City Council at their meeting on May 8, 2023. Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager City of Chanhassen, Minnesota (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on March 30, April 6 & April 13 2023) (Publish on www.questcdn.com) 158 IB-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS 1. COPIES OF BIDDING DOCUMENTS. 1.1 Complete sets of the Bidding Documents in the number and for the deposit sum stated in the Advertisement for Bids may be obtained from QuestCDN (www.questcdn.com), Quest Project #8419409. 1.2 Complete sets of Bidding Documents shall be used in preparing Bids; neither Owner nor Engineer assumes any responsibility for errors or misinterpretations resulting from the use of incomplete sets of BiddingDocuments. 1.3 Owner and Engineer in making copies of Bidding Documents available on the above terms do so only for the purpose of obtaining Bids on the work and do not confer a license or grant for any other use. 2. QUALIFICATIONS OF BIDDERS. To demonstrate qualifications to perform the work, each Bidder must be prepared to submit within five days of Owner’s request written evidence of financial data, and previous experience. Each Bid must contain evidence of Bidder’s qualification to do business in the State where the Project is located, or covenant to obtain such qualification prior to award of the Contract. 3. EXAMINATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SITE. 3.1 Before submitting a Bid, each Bidder must (a) examine the Contract Documents thoroughly, (b) visit the site to familiarize himself/herself with local conditions that may in any manner affect cost, progress or performance of the work, (c) familiarize himself/herself with Federal, State, and Local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations that may in any manner affect cost, progress or performance of the work, and (d) study and carefully correlate Bidder’s observations with the Contract Documents. 3.2 Reference is made to the Special Provisions for the identification of those reports of investigations and tests of subsurface and latent physical conditions at the site or otherwise affecting cost, progress or performance of the work which have been relied upon by Engineer in preparing the Drawings and Specifications. Copies of such reports are bound with the Specifications. These reports are not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness, nor are they a part of the Contract Documents. Before submitting his/her Bid, each Bidder will, at his/her own expense, make such additional investigations and tests as the Bidder may deem necessary to determine his/her Bid for performance of the work in accordance with the time, price, and other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. 3.3 On request, Owner will provide each Bidder access to the site to conduct such investigations and tests as each Bidder deems necessary for submission of his/her Bid. 3.4 The submission of a Bid will constitute an incontrovertible representation by the Bidder that he/she has complied with every requirement of this Article 3 and that the Contract Documents are sufficient in scope and detail to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance of the work. 4. INTERPRETATIONS. All questions about the meaning or intent of the Contract Documents shall be submitted to Engineer in writing. Replies will be issued by Addenda mailed or delivered to all parties recorded by Engineer as having received the Bidding Documents. Questions received less than four days prior to the date for opening of Bids will not be answered. Only questions answered by formal written Addenda will be binding. Oral and other interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect. 159 IB-2 5. BID SECURITY. 5.1 Bid security shall be made payable to the Owner, in an amount as stated in the Advertisement for Bids of the Bidder’s maximum Bid price, and in the form of a certified or bank check or a Bid Bond, issued by a Surety, meeting the requirements of paragraph 2.06 of the General Conditions. 5.2 The Bid Security of the three lowest Bidders will be retained until the successful Bidder has executed the Agreement and furnished the required Contract Security, whereupon it will be returned; if the successful Bidder fails to execute and deliver the Agreement and furnish the required Contract Security within 15 days of the Notice of Award. Owner may annul the Notice of Award and the Bid Security of that Bidder will be forfeited. The Bid Security of any Bidder whom Owner believes to have a reasonable chance of receiving the award (generally the second and third low Bidder) may be retained by the Owner until the earlier of the seventh day after the “effective date of the Agreement” (which term is defined in the General Conditions) by Owner to Contractor and the required Contract Security is furnished or the sixty-first day after the Bid opening. Bid security of other Bidders will be returned within seven days of the Bid opening. 6. CONTRACT TIME. The number of days within which, or the date by which, the work is to be completed (the Contract time) is set forth in the Bid Form and will be included in the SpecialProvisions. 7. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. Provisions for liquidated damages are set forth in the General Conditions, Paragraph 8.08. 8. SUBCONTRACTORS, ETC. 8.1 If the Bid Proposal or Supplementary Conditions require the identity of certain subcontractors and other persons and organizations to be submitted to Owner in advance of the Notice of Award, the apparent Successful Bidder, and any other Bidder so requests, will within seven days after the day of the Bid Opening submit to Owner a list of all subcontractors and other persons and organizations (including those who are to furnish the principal items of material and equipment) proposed for those portions of the work as to which such identification is so required. Such list shall be accompanied by an experience statement with pertinent information as to similar projects and other evidence of qualification of each such subcontractor, person and organization if requested by Owner. If Owner or Engineer after due investigation has reasonable objection to any proposed subcontractor, other person or organization, either may before giving the Notice of Award request the apparent Successful Bidder to submit an acceptable substitute without an increase in Bid price. If the apparent successful Bidder declines to make any such substitution, the Contract shall not be awarded to such Bidder, but his/her declining to make any such substitution will not constitute grounds for sacrificing his/her Bid Security. Any subcontractor, other person or organization so listed and to whom Owner or Engineer does not make written objection prior to the giving of the Notice of Award will be deemed acceptable to Owner and Engineer. 8.2 In contracts where the Contract Price is on the basis of Cost-of-the-Work Plus a Fee, the apparent Successful Bidder, prior to the Notice of Award shall identify in writing to Owner those portions of the work that such Bidder proposes to subcontract and after the Notice of Award may only subcontract other portions of the work with Owner’s written consent. 8.3 No Contractor shall be required to employ any subcontractor, other person or organization against whom he/she has reasonable objection. 9. BID FORM. 9.1 One Bid Form is attached hereto and is provided to each Bidder requesting Bid Documents. Additional copies may be obtained from the Engineer. 160 IB-3 9.2 Bid Forms must be completed in ink or digitally. The Bid Price of each item on the form must be stated in words and numerals; in case of a conflict, words will take precedence. 9.3 Bids by corporations must be executed in the corporate name by the president or a vice- president (or other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign) and the corporate seal must be affixed and attested by the secretary or an assistant secretary. The corporate address and state of incorporation shall be shown below the signature. 9.4 Bids by partnerships must be executed in the partnership name and be signed by a partner, whose title must appear under the signature and the official address of the partnership must be shown below the signature. 9.5 All names must be typed or printed below thesignature. 9.6 The Bid shall contain an acknowledgement of receipt of all Addenda (the number of which shall be filled in on the BidForm). 9.7 The address to which communications regarding the Bid are to be directed must be shown. 10. SUBMISSION OF BIDS. Bids shall be submitted at the time and place indicated in the Invitation to Bid or Advertisement for Bids and shall be included in an opaque sealed envelope, marked with the Project title and name and address of the Bidder and accompanied by the Bid Security and other required documents. If the Bid is sent through the mail or other delivery system, the sealed envelope shall be enclosed in a separate envelope with the notation “BID ENCLOSED” on the face thereof. Bids arriving at the designated place after the designated time will be returned to the Bidder unopened. 11. MODIFICATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF BIDS. 11.1 Bids may be modified or withdrawn by an appropriate document duly executed (in the manner that a Bid must be executed) and delivered to the place where Bids are to be submitted at any time prior to the opening ofBids. 11.2 If, within twenty-four (24) hours after Bids are opened, any Bidder files a duly signed written notice with Owner and promptly thereafter demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of Owner that there was a material and substantial mistake in the preparation of his/her Bid, that Bidder may withdraw his/her Bid and the Bid Security will be returned. Thereafter, that Bidder will be disqualified from further bidding on the work. 12. OPENING OF BIDS. When Bids are opened publicly, they will be read aloud and an abstract of the amounts of the base Bids and major alternates (if any) will be made available after the opening of Bids 13. BIDS TO REMAIN OPEN. All Bids shall remain open for sixty days after the day of the Bid opening, but Owner may, in his/her sole discretion, release any Bid and return the Bid Security prior to thatdate. 14. AWARD OF CONTRACT. 14.1 Owner reserves the right to reject any and all Bids, to waive any and all informalities and to negotiate Contract terms with the Successful Bidder, and the right to disregard all nonconforming, non-responsive or conditional Bids. The quantities shown on the Bid Form are estimated and are furnished only as a basis to prepare a Bid and to determine the lowest Bidder. The Bid Price shall be determined by multiplying the unit price bid per item times the estimated quantity per item. The sum total of all Bid Prices shall be the Contract Price and the basis for determining the lowest Bid. Discrepancies between words and figures in a unit price bid will be resolved to harmonize with the Bid Price. If neither the words nor figures in the unit price harmonize with the Bid Price, the words will be used as the unit pricebid. 14.2 In evaluating Bids, Owner shall consider the qualifications of the Bidders, whether or not the Bids comply with the prescribed requirements, and alternates and unit prices if requested in 161 IB-4 the Bid Forms. It is Owner’s intent to accept alternates (if any are accepted) in the order in which they are listed in the Bid form but Owner may accept them in any order or combination. 14.3 Owner may consider the qualifications and experience of subcontractors and other persons and organizations (including those who are to furnish the principal items of material or equipment) proposed for those portions of the work as to which the identity of subcontractors and other persons and organizations must be submitted as provided in the Supplementary Conditions. Operating costs, maintenance considerations, performance data and guarantee of materials and equipment may also be considered byOwner. 14.4 Owner may conduct such investigations as he/she deems necessary to assist in the evaluation of any Bid and to establish the responsibility, qualifications and financial ability of the Bidders, proposed subcontractors and other persons and organizations to do the work in accordance with the Contract Documents to Owner’s satisfaction within the prescribed time. 14.5 Owner reserves the right to reject the Bid of any Bidder who does not pass any such evaluation to Owner’ssatisfaction. 14.6 If the Contract is to be awarded, it will be awarded to the lowest Bidder whose evaluation by Owner indicates to Owner that the award will be in the best interests of theProject. 14.7 If the Contract is to be awarded, Owner will give the Successful Bidder a Notice of Award within sixty days after the date of the Bid opening or other specified date. 15. PERFORMANCE AND OTHER BONDS. Paragraph 3.04 of the General Conditions set forth Owner’s requirements as to performance and other Bonds. When the Successful Bidder delivers the executed Agreement to Owner, it shall be accompanied by the required Contract Security. 16. SIGNING OF AGREEMENT. When Owner gives a Notice of Award to the Successful Bidder, it will be accompanied by at least three unsigned counterparts of the Agreement and all other Contract Documents. Within fifteen days thereafter, Contractor shall sign and deliver at least three counterparts of the Agreement to Owner with all other Contract Documents attached. Within ten days thereafter, Owner will deliver all fully signed counterparts to Contractor. Engineer will identify those portions of the Contract Documents not fully signed by Owner and Contractor and such identification shall be binding on all parties. 17. SPECIAL LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. Special Legal Requirements, if any, will be included in the Special Provisions. END OF DOCUMENT 162 PROJECT #23-04 BID FORM BIDDER: BID FORM 2023 MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 23-04 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA THIS BID IS SUBMITTED TO: The City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317-0147 1.01 The undersigned Bidder proposes and agrees, if this Bid is accepted, to enter into an Agreement with OWNER in the form included in the Bidding Documents to perform all Work as specified or indicated in the Bidding Documents for the prices and within the times indicated in the Bid and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Bidding Documents. 2.01 Bidder accepts all of the terms and conditions of the Advertisement or Invitation to Bid and Instructions to Bidders, including without limitation those dealing with the disposition of Bid security. The Bid will remain subject to acceptance for 60 days after the Bid opening, or for such longer period of time that Bidder may agree to in writing upon request of OWNER. 3.01 In submitting this Bid, Bidder represents, as set forth in the Agreement, that: A. Bidder has examined and carefully studied the Bidding Documents, the other related data identified in the Bidding Documents, and the following Addenda, receipt of all which is hereby acknowledged. Addendum No. Addendum Date B. Bidder has visited the Site and has become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Bidder is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress and performance of the Work. D. Bidder has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the Supplementary Conditions as provided in Paragraph 4.02 of the General Conditions, and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, which has been identified in the Supplementary Conditions as provided in Paragraph 4.06 of the General Conditions. 163 PROJECT #23-04 BID FORM E. Bidder has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for having done so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface and Underground Facilities) at or contiguou s to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Bidder, including applying the specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding Documents to be employed by Bidder, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Bidder does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, exp lorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the determination of this Bid for performance of the Work at the price(s) bid and within the times and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Bidding Documents. G. Bidder is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by OWNER and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Bidding Documents. H. Bidder has correlated the information known to Bidder, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Bidding Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Bidding Documents. I. Bidder has given ENGINEER written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambigui ties, or discrepancies that Bidder has discovered in the Bidding Documents, and the written resolution thereof by ENGINEER is acceptable to Bidder. J. The Bidding Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for the performance of the Work for which this Bid is submitted. 4.01 Bidder further represents that: A. The prices in this Bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication or agreement as to any matters relating to such prices with any other Bidder or with any competitor for the purpose of restricting competition. B. The prices in this Bid have not or will not be knowingly disclosed to any other Bidder or competitor prior to opening of the Bids. C. No attempt has been made or will be made by the Bidder to induce any other person or firm to submit or not to submit a Bid for the purpose of restricting competition. 4.02 Bidder understands that the law may require the Owner, or Engineer at the Owner’s direction, to undertake an investigation and submit an evaluation concerning Bidder’s responsiveness, responsibility and qualifications before awarding a contract. Bidder hereby waives any and all claims, of whatever nature, against Owner, Engineer and their employees and agents, which arise out of or relate to such investigation and evaluation, and statements made as a result thereof, except for statements that can be shown by clear and convincing evidence to be intentionally false and made with actual malice. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to restrict Bidder’s rights to challenge a contract pursuant to law. 5.01 Bidder will complete the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents for the following price(s): All specific cash allowances are included in the price(s) set forth below and have been computed in accordance with paragraph 3.01 of the General Conditions. Unit Prices have been computed in accordance with paragraph 3.01 of the General Conditions. 164 PROJECT #23-04 BID FORM Bidder acknowledges that estimated quantities are not guaranteed, and are solely for the purpose of comparison of Bids, and final payment for all Unit Price Bid items will be based on actual quantities provided, determined as provided in the Contract Documents. NO. ITEM UNITS QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE CREEKWOOD DRIVE AREA 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $__________ $______________ 2 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5”) SY 1326 $__________ $______________ 3 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 115 $__________ $______________ 4 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $__________ $______________ CREEKWOOD DRIVE AREA TOTAL $______________ OAKSIDE CIRCLE AREA 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $__________ $______________ 2 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (FULL DEPTH) SY 1625 $__________ $______________ 3 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 140 $__________ $______________ 4 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 140 $__________ $______________ 5 EXCAVATION – COMMON (EV) CY 160 $__________ $______________ 6 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (CV) CY 160 $__________ $______________ 7 EXCAVATION – SUBGRADE (EV) CY 80 $__________ $______________ 8 STABILIZING AGGREGATE 3”-0 (CV) CY 80 $__________ $______________ 9 TURF ESTABLISHMENT LF 650 $__________ $______________ 10 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $__________ $______________ OAKSIDE CIRCLE AREA TOTAL $______________ 165 PROJECT #23-04 BID FORM SUNRIDGE COURT AREA 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $__________ $______________ 2 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (FULL DEPTH) SY 2653 $__________ $______________ 3 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 230 $__________ $______________ 4 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 230 $__________ $______________ 5 EXCAVATION – COMMON (EV) CY 80 $__________ $______________ 6 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (CV) CY 80 $__________ $______________ 7 EXCAVATION – SUBGRADE (EV) CY 40 $__________ $______________ 8 STABILIZING AGGREGATE 3”-0 (CV) CY 40 $__________ $______________ 9 TURF ESTABLISHMENT LF 1150 $__________ $______________ 10 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $__________ $______________ SUNRIDGE COURT AREA TOTAL $______________ GRAND TOTAL $______________ 5.02 Completion Date: November 15, 2023 6.01 Bidder agrees that the Work will be substantially completed and ready for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 9.14 of the General Conditions on or before the dates or within the number of calendar days indicated in the Contract Documents. 6.02 Bidder accepts the provisions of the Contract Documents as to liquidated damages in the event of failure to complete the Work within the times specified above, which shall be stated in the Agreement. 7.01 The following documents are attached to and made a condition of this Bid: A. Required Bid Security in the form of Five Percent (5%). B. Form of Non-Collusion Affidavit C. Contractor Verification of Compliance 8.01 The terms used in this Bid with initial capital letters have the meanings indicated in the Instructions to Bidders, the General Conditions, and the Special Provisions. SUBMITTED on , 2023 166 PROJECT #23-04 BID FORM If Bidder Is: An Individual Name (typed or printed): By: (SEAL) (Individual's Signature) Doing business as: Business address: Phone No.: Fax No. Email address: ____________________________________________________________ A Partnership Partnership Name: By: (Signature of General Partner) Name (typed or printed): Business address: Phone No.: Fax No. Email address: ____________________________________________________________ 167 PROJECT #23-04 BID FORM A Corporation Corporation Name: (SEAL) State of Incorporation: Type (General Business, Professional, Service, Limited Liability): By: (Signature) Name (typed or printed): Title: Attest: (CORPORATE SEAL) (Signature of Corporate Secretary) Business address: Phone No.: Fax No. Email address: A Joint Venture Joint Venture Name: (SEAL) By: (Signature of Joint Venture Partner) Name (typed or printed): Type: Business address: Phone No.: Fax No. 168 PROJECT #23-04 BID FORM Email address: _ Joint Venturer Name: (SEAL) By: (Signature) Name (typed or printed): Type: Business address: Phone No.: Fax No. Email address: Phone and Fax Number, Email Address, and Address for receipt of official communications: (Each joint venturer must sign. The manner of signing for each individual, partnership, and corporation that is a party to the joint venture should be in the manner indicated above). 169 PROJECT #23-04 BID FORM FORM OF NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH BID PROPOSAL) Affidavit of Non-Collusion: I hereby swear (or affirm) under the penalty for perjury: 1. That I am the bidder (if the bidder is an individual), a partner in the bidder partnership (if the bidder is a partnership), or an officer or employee of the bidding corporation having authority to sign on its behalf (if the bidder is a corporation). 2. That the attached bid or bids have been arrived at by the bidder independently, and have been submitted without collusion with, and without, any other vendor of materials, supplies, equipment, or other services described in the invitation to bid, designed to limit independent bidding or competition. 3. That the contents of the bid or bids have not been communicated by the bidder or its employees or agents to any person not an employee or agent of the bidder or its surety on any bond furnished with the bid or bids, and will not be communicated to any such person prior to the official opening of the bids or bids; and 4. That I have fully informed myself regarding the accuracy of the statements made in this affidavit. Signed ______________________________ Firm _______________________________ Name ______________________________ Address 170 PROJECT #23-04 BID FORM CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE The undersigned, being first duly sworn, as a responding contractor on the Project, represents and swears as follows: Now, and at all times during the duration of the Project, the undersigned complies with each of the minimum criteria in Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3, the Responsible Contractor statute. The undersigned understands that a failure to meet or verify compliance with the minimum criteria established for a "responsible contractor" as defined in Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3, renders a bidder ineligible to be awarded a construction contract for the Project or to perform work on the Project. Upon request, the undersigned will submit copies of the signed verifications of compliance from all subcontractors. The undersigned understands that a false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria shall make the undersigned, or its subcontractor that makes the false statement, ineligible to be awarded a construction project and may result in termination of a contract awarded to the undersigned or its subcontractor that submits a false statement . Contractor: By: Its: 171 1 175881v1 FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND CONTRACTOR FOR 2023 MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT NO. 23-04 THIS AGREEMENT, made this _____ day of _____________, 2023, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Owner”) and ____________________________________ (“Contractor”). Owner and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents”, all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement; B. Specifications dated March 20, 2023; C. City of Chanhassen General Conditions of the Construction Contract; D. Bid dated ____________________________. In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “D” having the last priority. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. CONTRACT PRICE. Owner shall pay Contractor for completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents the amount of ______________________ XX/100 ($XXX,XXX.XX). 4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES. A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment. Applications for Payment will be processed by Engineer as provided in the General Conditions. B. Progress Payments; Retainage. Owner shall make 95% progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment during performance of the Work. C. Payments to Subcontractor. 172 2 175881v1 (1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1 ½ percent per month or any part of a month to the Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. (2) Form IC-134 (attached) required from general contractor. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Chanhassen obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of Revenue for approval. The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid. D. Final Payment. Upon final completion of the Work, Owner shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by Engineer. 5. COMPLETION DATE/LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. A. The work for streets must be completed on or before August 31, 2023 and be ready for final payment in accordance with the General Conditions. B. Contract and Owner recognize that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that Owner will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in Paragraph 5.A. above, plus any extensions thereof allowed. The parties also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal or arbitration proceeding the actual loss suffered by Owner if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, Owner and Contractor agree that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), Contractor shall pay Owner $900.00 for each calendar day that expires after the time specified in Paragraph 5.A. for Completion until the Work is complete. 173 3 175881v1 6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the General Conditions and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the site. E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding Documents, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by Owner and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. 174 4 175881v1 I. Contractor has given Engineer written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by Engineer is acceptable to Contractor. J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. K. Subcontracts: (1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, upon receipt of the executed Contract Documents, submit in writing to the Owner the names of the Subcontractors proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request or with the consent of the Owner. (2) The Contractor is responsible to the Owner for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's subcontractors, and of their direct and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's employees. (3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between the Owner, the Engineer, and any Subcontractor. (4) The Contractor shall bind every Subcontractor by the terms of the Contract Documents. 7. WORKER’S COMPENSATION. The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY. Contractor shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage and maintain it at all times throughout the life of the Contract, with the City included as an additional name insured on a primary and non- contributory basis. The Contractor shall furnish the City a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the required coverage: Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate 175 5 175881v1 Contractual Liability (identifying the contract): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Personal Injury, with Employment Exclusion deleted: $2,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non-owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence 9. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the quote shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications. 10. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a result of any such claims. 11. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General Conditions. B. Owner and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon Owner and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and 176 6 175881v1 enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provisions. D. Data Practices/Records. (1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. (2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices to the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. E. Software License. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Contract contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. F. Patented devices, materials and processes. If the Contract requires, or the Contractor desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Contractor shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the Owner. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the Project agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the Owner for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement G. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. H. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract 177 7 175881v1 by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. I. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Contract. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County. J. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Contract is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Contract, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Contract impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties’ entire contract. K. Entire Agreement. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all-inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. L. Permits and Licenses; Rights-of-Way and Easements. The Contractor shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees therefore, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the construction and completion of the Project. The City will obtain all necessary rights-of- way and easements. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for any construction delay resulting from the City’s not timely obtaining rights-of-way or easements. M. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the action or inaction of the Owner, the Contractor shall be allowed a time extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other compensation. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CONTRACTOR: BY: BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor Its BY: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager 178 SP-1 SPECIAL PROVISIONS TO THE 2023 MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT NO. 23-04 SPECIFICATIONS 1.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE & INTERMEDIATE COMPLETION DATES Project Timeline, Notification and Schedule The project must be substantially complete prior to October 1, 2023. Substantial completion shall include the following work; placement of wear course bituminous pavement and turf establishment in all three project locations. The project will have a final completion date and be ready for final payment on or before November 15, 2023. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer two weeks in advance of scheduled work for each area. Once pavement is milled in a particular project area, the bituminous paving must be installed within the next 7 calendar days. The Contractor shall notify with documentation all affected residences at least 48 hours prior to driveway access disruption of planned work. The Contractor-produced notification document shall be subject to the approval of the Engineer prior to the distribution. Project Phasing The 2023 Mill & Overlay Project will consist of three project locations. Those areas include the following: Creekwood Drive (1.5”), Oakside Circle (Full Depth), and Sunridge Court (Full Depth). All areas may be allowed to be worked on simultaneously with approval from the Engineer. A traffic control plan must be submitted to the Engineer two weeks prior to construction on each area for approval. Curb & Utility Work Coordination No utility or curb work is anticipated with this project, however protection of all existing utilities and their appurtenances in each project area must be provided by the Contractor and is incidental to the contract. 179 SP-2 2.0 MILL PAVEMENT SURFACE (2232) Construction Requirements (Mill Bituminous Surface (1.5”)) Mill Bituminous Surface (1.5”) work shall consist of milling to a depth of one and a half inch (1.5”) and performed in accordance with the provisions of the most recent edition of the Chanhassen Street Specifications and MnDOT 2232. The contract unit price for Mill Bituminous Surface (1.5”) shall include all labor, equipment, and materials required for the milling and removal of the existing bituminous surface. Measurement for Mill Bituminous Surface (1.5”) shall be paid for by the square yard (SY). Construction Requirements (Mill Bituminous Surface (Full Depth)) Mill Bituminous Surface (Full Depth) work shall consist of milling the entire bituminous section and performed in accordance with the most recent edition of the Chanhassen Street Specifications provisions of MnDOT 2232. The provisions of MnDOT 2232 are modified and/or supplemented as follows: After milling the full depth of the bituminous section and prior to placing non wear course the Contractor shall perform a test or proof roll with the Engineer to determine if any soft spots require soil corrections. The contractor will furnish a tandem truck loaded with a minimum of 14 tons. This truck will be driven approximately 3 feet from the edge of the roadway when in unconfined locations and on both sides of the roadway and in other locations the Engineer may direct. Once all soil corrections have taken place and after the aggregate section has been scarified and recompacted, a second test or proof rolling shall be performed to again determine if any soft spots exist as determined by the Engineer so that these areas may be corrected. All test or proof rolling, scarifying, and recompacting shall be incidental. The contract unit price for Mill Bituminous Surface (Full Depth) shall include all labor, equipment, and materials required for the milling and removal of the existing bituminous surface. Measurement for Mill Bituminous Surface (Full Depth) shall be paid for by the square yard (SY). 3.0 PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION (2360) Mixture Designation Mix Designation Numbers for the bituminous mixtures on this Project are as follows: Type SP 9.5 Wearing Course Mix (3,C) SPWEA340C 180 SP-3 Type SP 12.5 Non Wear Course Mix (3,C) SPNWB330C Payment shall be made respectively for each mix type per ton (TON). Bituminous tack material shall be incidental. 4.0 EXCAVATION (2106) Common Excavation Common excavation is intended for use within the road areas where the existing aggregate is not adequate as determined by the required test or proof rolling and aggregate base must be excavated to install Aggregate Base Class 5 to match the existing depth. Payment shall be at the unit price bid per cubic yard (CY) as an excavated volume (EV), and shall be compensation in full for excavating, preparing the excavation areas, loading, hauling, placing and compacting fill, and disposal of material as required. Payment for Common Excavation shall not include the volume necessary for Turf Establishment. Subgrade Excavation Subgrade excavation is intended for use within the road areas where the existing subgrade is not adequate as determined by the required test or proof rolling and subgrade must be excavated to a depth of 6” to install Stabilizing Aggregate 3”-0. Payment shall be made at the unit price bid per cubic yard (CY) as an excavated volume (EV), and shall be compensation in full for excavation, hauling, stockpiling, and embankment, and the disposal of unsuitable material. 5.0 MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION Erosion Control (2573) The Contractor shall perform the work in such a manner to minimize the tracking of sediment and debris onto adjacent streets and roads. As sediment accumulates on paved streets, either by runoff or construction traffic, the Contractor shall clean the streets. The streets shall be cleaned daily or at the discretion of the Engineer or the Contractor’s erosion control supervisor. Upon completion and after the final lift of each project area, the Contractor shall clean all inlets, catch basins and sump manholes, with no extra cost to the city, to the Engineer’s satisfaction. The Contractor shall water all disturbed areas to control dust as directed by the Engineer. The Contractor shall be available and prepared at all times including weekends and holidays to water for dust control if deemed necessary by the Engineer. The water for watering will be furnished by the City at the City’s filling station, access codes will be 181 SP-4 provided at the preconstruction meeting. Watering for dust control shall be incidental to the contract. The installation, maintenance and removal of all sediment and erosion control measures as may be required to prevent sedimentation or erosion, as noted on the plans or as directed by the Engineer, shall be incidental. Turf Establishment (2575) All turf establishment resulting from construction activities will paid by the contract unit price for Turf Establishment and shall include all seed, fertilizer, topsoil, watering, labor, equipment and materials required under Section 4.14 of the 2023 Street Specifications. Measurement for Turf Establishment shall be paid for by the linear foot (LF). Staging Area and Material Storage There will be no storing/staging of equipment or materials outside of the designated project area right-of-way. The staging and storage of materials location must be presented to the Engineer for review and approval two weeks prior to the start of work. Surveying and Materials Testing The Owner will employ and pay for services of an independent testing laboratory to perform specified inspection and testing. This testing shall in no way relieve the contractor of obligations to perform work in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents. The contractor must notify the Engineer 48 hours in advance of testing needed and shall cooperate with laboratory personnel and allow them access to the work to be tested. The Owner will not be providing any survey staking for this project. This will be the responsibility of the Contractor if they deem necessary. Disposal of Excess Bituminous Millings Excess aggregate/bituminous millings produced by milling operations shall become the property of the Contractor and disposed of off the project. Disposal of excess aggregates/bituminous millings shall be considered incidental to project cost. 6.0 TRAFFIC CONTROL (1710) Local access to the project area must be maintained at all times or as approved by the Engineer. A traffic control plan must be submitted to the Engineer for approval two weeks prior to implementation for each project area. 182 SP-5 All traffic control devices shall conform and be installed in accordance to the "Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" (MN MUTCD) and Part 6K, "Minnesota Temporary Traffic Control Field Manual", and these Special Provisions. The Contractor shall furnish, install, maintain, and remove all traffic control devices required to provide safe movement of vehicular traffic through the project during the life of the contract from the start of contract operations to the final completion thereof. The Engineer will have the right to modify the requirements for traffic control as deemed necessary due to existing field conditions. The roads shall be kept open to traffic at all times, except as modified below. Traffic control devices may include, but are not limited to, barricades, warning signs, trailers, flashers, cones, drums, pavement markings and flagmen as required and sufficient barricade weights to maintain barricade stability. General Requirements (A) The Contractor shall be responsible for the immediate repair or replacement of all traffic control devices that become damaged, moved or destroyed, of all lights that cease to function properly, and of all barricade weights that are damaged, destroyed, or otherwise fail to stabilize the barricades. The Contractor shall further provide sufficient surveillance of all traffic control devices at least once every 24 hours. The Contractor shall furnish the Engineer the names, addresses and phone numbers of at least two (2) local persons responsible for all traffic control devices and who will respond to requests for maintenance from the Engineer. The Contractor shall provide a means of receiving maintenance requests on a 24-hour basis. (B) If traffic control layouts are not present in the plan, or the Contractor modifies the layout or sequence from the plan, the Contractor shall submit the proposed traffic control layout to the Engineer, for approval, at least 2 weeks prior to the start of construction. At least 24 hours prior to placement, all traffic control devices shall be available on the Project for inspection by the Engineer. The Contractor shall modify his/her proposed traffic control layout and/or devices as deemed necessary by the Engineer. (C) The Contractor shall notify the Engineer in writing at least 48 hours prior to the start of any construction operation that will necessitate lane closure or internal traffic control signing. (D) The Contractor shall inspect, on a daily basis, all traffic control devices, which the Contractor has furnished and installed, and verify that the devices are placed in accordance with these Special Provisions, and/or the MN MUTCD. Any 183 SP-6 discrepancy between the placement and the required placement shall be immediately corrected. The Contractor shall be required to respond immediately to any call from the Engineer or his designated representative concerning any request for improving or correcting traffic control devices. If the Contractor is negligent in correcting the deficiency within two hours of notification, the Contractor shall be subject to an hourly charge assessed at a rate of $250.00 per hour for each hour or any portion thereof with which the Engineer determines that the Contractor has not complied. (E) The person performing the inspection in Paragraph (D) above, shall be required to make a daily log. This log shall also include the date and time any changes in the stages, phases, or portions thereof go into effect. The log shall identify the location and verify that the devices are placed as directed or corrected in accordance with the Plan. All entries in the log shall include the date and time of the entry and be signed by the person making the inspection. The Engineer reserves the right to request copies of the logs as he deems necessary. The Contractor shall be required to provide copies of the inspection logs, within the time frame agreed upon, when requested by the Engineer. (F) The Contractor shall furnish flag persons as required to adequately control traffic. Flag persons shall conform to the requirements set forth in the MN MUTCD. All costs incurred to provide such flag persons shall be incidental to the lump sum traffic control. (G) All portable sign assemblies shall be perpendicular to the ground. No traffic control device (signs, channelizing devices, arrowboards, etc.) shall be weighted so they become hazardous to motorists and workers. The approved ballast system for devices mounted on temporary portable supports is sandbags, unless it is designed, crash tested, and approved for the specific device. During freezing conditions, the sand for bags shall be mixed with a de-icer to prevent the sand from freezing. The sandbags shall be placed and maintained at the base of the traffic control device to the satisfaction of the Engineer. When signs will remain in the same location for more than 30 consecutive days the signs shall be post mounted. This would not include portable signs which are set up and taken down at the beginning and end of each work shift. (H) When signs are installed, they shall be mounted on posts driven into the ground at the proper height and lateral offset as detailed in the MN MUTCD. When signs are removed, the sign posts and stub posts shall also be removed from the Right of Way as soon as possible. 184 SP-7 (I) The Contractor shall be required to cover or remove all traffic control devices which may be inconsistent with traffic patterns during all traffic switches. See Maintenance and Staging of Traffic Control. (J) The Contractor shall provide protective devices necessary to protect traffic from excavations, drop-offs, falling objects, splatter or other hazards that may exist during construction. This work shall be an incidental cost to the Contractor. (K) The Contractor will not be permitted to park vehicles or construction equipment so as to obstruct any traffic control device. The parking of workers' private vehicles will not be allowed within the project limits unless so approved by the Engineer. (L) The Contractor will not be allowed to store materials or equipment within 30 feet of through traffic unless approved by the Engineer. If materials or equipment must be stored within 30 feet of through traffic, the Contractor shall provide barricades or barriers, as directed by the Engineer, to warn and protect traffic. (M) All in-place signs and delineators mounted on less than three posts (not including back bracing) and which interfere with the Contractor's normal operation, shall be relocated outside of the work area by the Contractor at the direction of the Engineer. Any signs that are removed and may be reused are to be stored in such a manner as to protect the sign from scratching, fading, or other harmful affects until said signs are reinstalled. Upon completion of work at each sign location, or at the direction of the Engineer, the signs shall be replaced as near to their original locations as possible or to a location designated by the Engineer. Signs and structures damaged by the Contractor shall be replaced by him at his own expense. Regulatory signs, not otherwise covered by this Contract, may only be removed or replaced or relocated by City of Chanhassen or Carver County personnel. (N) The Contractor shall remove all pavement markings that conflict with temporary traffic control operations in accordance with MnDOT 2102. Removal of these pavement markings shall be included in the lump sum payment for traffic control. (O) Truck Mounted Attenuators (TMA'S) If the Contractor establishes a moving lane closure on a high speed roadway, any vehicle operating totally or partially in a traffic lane shall be equipped with a truck mounted attenuator that meets the requirements of NCHRP 250. The moving lane closure shall meet the requirements described in the appropriate Field Manual layout. Milling, Reclaiming and Paving Operations 185 SP-8 (A) Traffic will be allowed on the milled surface; however, the Contractor shall be responsible for furnishing and installing interim center line delineation as directed by the Engineer by the end of the day. Payment for temporary delineation shall be incidental to the lump sum traffic control. (B) When traffic is allowed to drive on the milled surface, the Contractor shall furnish and install "GROOVED PAVEMENT" and "BUMP" signs with "Advisory Speed" plates at locations determined by the Engineer. When traffic is allowed to drive on the gravel surface, the Contractor shall furnish and install "LOOSE GRAVEL" and "BUMP" signs with "Advisory Speed" plates at locations determined by the Engineer. The Contractor shall furnish and install Type I traffic control around structures in the roadway protruding from the milled surface including, but not limited to, manholes, catch basins, and gate valves. Payment for these signs and Type I traffic control shall be included in the lump sum payment for traffic control. (C) Any drop-off where traffic will cross from or to the in-place surface, or from or to the milled surface, shall be tapered and/or chamfered so as to provide for the safe passage of traffic. (D) The Contractor shall schedule construction operations so as to minimize traffic exposure to uneven lanes, milled edges, and edge drop-offs. Only after every attempt has been made to avoid these conditions and one or more of them are deemed necessary, the Contractor shall provide and maintain the appropriate traffic control in accordance with the "DROP OFF GUIDELINES" in the Field Manual. (E) The Contractor shall not mill any false joints for surfacing tapers until immediately prior to paving, except that with the Engineer's permission, the Contractor may mill the false joints and install and maintain temporary bituminous tapers to provide for the safe passage of traffic until the surfacing taper is installed. Maintenance and Staging of Traffic Control (A) Pedestrian traffic shall be maintained and guided through the Project at all times. (B) All signs installed on roads open to traffic that are not consistent with traffic operations shall be covered as directed by the Engineer. The cover should be a plate of solid material covering the entire legend or all of that part of the legend that is inappropriate. This cover shall be bolted to the sign and shall use a minimum of 3 mm [1/8 inch] plastic washers between the sign face and the cover. See "Typical-Temporary Construction Sign Panel Overlay (Cover)" (Traffic Engineering Manual Chapter 8) for additional details. 186 SP-9 (C) The Contractor shall at all times maintain a lane width of not less than 12 feet in each direction. If the street width does not allow for this, a traffic control plan must be approved by the Engineer. (D) Street identification signage shall be maintained at all times. This is necessary to maintain the 911 emergency system. Measurement and Payment The contract unit price for Traffic Control shall include all labor, equipment, and materials required for Traffic Control as specified in these Special Provisions. Measurement for Traffic Control shall be paid for in lump sum (LS). The lump sum payment(s) shall be compensation in full for all costs of furnishing, installing, maintaining, relocating, and removing the individual traffic control devices as shown on the Traffic Control Layouts in the Plans and/or as specified in these Special Provisions. The lump sum shall also include any extra signing needed to facilitate traffic switches or for transitioning traffic from one stage to another. If the Contractor requests changes in traffic control as shown on the Traffic Control Layout(s), and these changes are implemented, there will be no increase or decrease in the lump sum payment(s) for the traffic control. Partial payments for lump sum Traffic Control will be made as follows: % of Contract Completed % of Item Paid 5% 15% 25% 40% 50% 70% 75% 90% 100% (Final 100%) 187 224769v1 2023 GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.00 – DEFINITIONS 1 SECTION 2.00 - BIDDING REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 2.01 Qualifications of Bidders ...................................................................................................... 5 2.02 Contract Document Interpretations ...................................................................................... 6 2.03 Interpretation of Quantities in Bid Schedule ....................................................................... 7 2.04 Site Investigation ................................................................................................................... 7 2.05 Submission of Proposal ........................................................................................................ 7 2.06 Proposal Guaranty ................................................................................................................. 8 2.07 Affidavit of Non-collusion ................................................................................................... 8 2.08 Withdrawal of Proposals....................................................................................................... 8 SECTION 3.00 - AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT 3.01 Evaluation of Proposals ........................................................................................................ 9 3.02 Contract Award and Execution ............................................................................................ 9 3.03 Proposal Alternates ............................................................................................................. 10 3.04 Contract Security & Guaranty ............................................................................................ 10 3.05 Preconstruction Conference ................................................................................................ 11 3.06 Failure to Execute Contract ................................................................................................ 11 SECTION 4.00 - SCOPE OF WORK 4.01 Additional Instructions ........................................................................................................ 12 4.02 Changes or Alterations in the Work. .................................................................................. 12 4.03 Oral Agreements ................................................................................................................. 12 4.04 Interpretations and Change Orders ..................................................................................... 13 4.05 Salvage ................................................................................................................................. 13 4.06 Fossils................................................................................................................................... 13 4.07 Cleanup ................................................................................................................................ 13 SECTION 5.00 - CONTROL OF WORK 188 224769v1 5.01 Engineer's Responsibility and Authority ........................................................................... 14 5.02 Intent of Plans and Specifications ...................................................................................... 15 5.03 Shop Drawings .................................................................................................................... 15 5.04 Dimensions .......................................................................................................................... 15 5.05 Models ................................................................................................................................. 15 5.06 Adequacy of Plans and Specifications ............................................................................... 15 5.07 Conflict ................................................................................................................................ 15 5.08 Discrepancies in Plans ........................................................................................................ 16 5.09 Separate Contracts ............................................................................................................... 16 5.10 Plans and Specifications at Job Site ................................................................................... 16 5.11 Moving of Public and Private Utilities .............................................................................. 17 5.12 Protection of Existing Improvements or Utilities ............................................................. 17 5.13 Damage to Existing Improvements or Utilities ................................................................. 18 5.14 Monuments and Stakes ....................................................................................................... 19 5.15 Inspectors ............................................................................................................................. 20 5.16 Examination of Completed Work ...................................................................................... 20 5.17 Owner's Right to Correct Deficiencies .............................................................................. 20 5.18 Traffic Control and Maintenance ....................................................................................... 20 5.19 Traffic Control Within and Abutting the Project .............................................................. 21 5.20 Removal of Construction Equipment, Tools & Supplies ................................................. 22 5.21 Suspension of Work by Engineer ....................................................................................... 22 5.22 Suspension of Work by Owner .......................................................................................... 22 SECTION 6.00 - CONTROL OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP 6.01 Quality of Equipment and Materials .................................................................................. 24 6.02 Testing .................................................................................................................................. 24 6.03 Use of Premises ................................................................................................................... 25 6.04 Storage of Materials ............................................................................................................ 25 6.05 Manufacturer's Directions ................................................................................................... 25 6.06 Rejected Work and Materials ............................................................................................. 25 6.07 Materials Furnished by the Owner ..................................................................................... 26 6.08 Materials Furnished by the Contractor .............................................................................. 26 6.09 Unacceptable Work and Materials ..................................................................................... 26 SECTION 7.00 - LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY TO PUBLIC 7.01 Comprehensive General Liability ...................................................................................... 28 7.02 Construction Days and Hours ............................................................................................. 28 7.03 Drug and Alcohol Testing .................................................................................................. 29 7.04 Water .................................................................................................................................... 29 7.05 Noise Elimination ................................................................................................................ 29 7.06 Patents .................................................................................................................................. 29 7.07 Privileges of Contractor in Streets, Rights-of-Way and Easements ................................ 29 7.08 Discrimination on Account of Race, Creed or Color ........................................................ 30 189 224769v1 7.09 Safety ................................................................................................................................... 30 7.10 Sanitary Provisions .............................................................................................................. 31 7.11 Railroad Crossings .............................................................................................................. 31 7.12 Use of Explosives................................................................................................................ 31 7.13 Private Property ................................................................................................................... 31 7.14 Right to Use Improvement .................................................................................................. 31 7.15 Contractor's Responsibilities .............................................................................................. 32 7.16 Lands by Owner .................................................................................................................. 32 7.17 Lands by Contractor ............................................................................................................ 33 SECTION 8.00 - PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS 8.01 Subcontracts ........................................................................................................................ 34 8.02 Contractor's Superintendent ................................................................................................ 34 8.03 Contractor's Employees ...................................................................................................... 34 8.04 Injunctions ........................................................................................................................... 35 8.05 Rights of Various Interests ................................................................................................. 35 8.06 Work During an Emergency ............................................................................................... 35 8.07 Delays & Extension of Contract Time ............................................................................... 35 8.08 Construction Schedule & Liquidated Damages ................................................................ 36 8.09 Owner's Right to Terminate Contract & Complete the Work .......................................... 37 8.10 Contractor's Right to Terminate Contract .......................................................................... 38 SECTION 9.00 - MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT 9.01 Measurement........................................................................................................................ 39 9.02 Scope of Payment ................................................................................................................ 39 9.03 Payment for Extra Work. .................................................................................................... 39 9.04 Progress Payments, Retained Percentage .......................................................................... 43 9.05 Engineer's Action on Request for Payment ....................................................................... 43 9.06 Owner's Action on an Approved Request for Payment .................................................... 43 9.07 Payment for Work by the Owner ....................................................................................... 43 9.08 Payment for Uncorrected Work ......................................................................................... 43 9.09 Payment for Rejected Work and Materials. ....................................................................... 43 9.10 Payment for Work Suspended by the Owner .................................................................... 44 9.11 Payment for Work Following Owner's Termination of the Contract .............................. 44 9.12 Payment for Work Terminated by the Contractor............................................................. 44 9.13 Release of Liens .................................................................................................................. 44 9.14 Acceptance and Final Payment .......................................................................................... 44 9.15 Termination of Contractor's Responsibility ....................................................................... 45 9.16 Correction of Faulty Work After Final Payment ............................................................... 45 9.17 Failure to Pay for Labor and Materials .............................................................................. 45 9.18 Contract Documents ............................................................................................................ 47 9.19 As-Built Requirements ........................................................................................................ 71 190 GC-1 224769v1 SECTION 1.00 - DEFINITIONS 1.01 GENERAL: For the purposes of the Contract Documents and any documents or instruments dealing with the construction, operations governed by these documents, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. 1.02 ADDENDUM: A supplement to the proposal form as originally issued or printed, covering additions, corrections, or changes in the bidding conditions for the advertised work, that is issued by the Contracting Authority to prospective bidders prior to the date set for opening of proposals. 1.03 BID: The written offer or copy thereof of a bidder to perform the work described by the Contract Documents when made out and submitted on the prescribed bid form properly signed and guaranteed. 1.04 BIDDER: An individual, firm, partnership or corporation, or combination thereof, submitting a bid for the work contemplated and acting directly or through a duly authorized representative. 1.05 CALENDAR DAY: Every day shown on the calendar. 1.06 CHANGE ORDER: A written order to the Contractor authorizing an addition, deletion or revision in the work within the general scope of the Contract Documents, or authorizing an adjustment in the contract price or time of completion. 1.07 CONTRACT: The written agreement between the Contracting Authority and the Contractor setting forth their obligations, including, but not limited to, the performance of the work, the furnishing of labor and materials, the basis of payment, and other requirements contained in the Contract Documents. The Contract Documents consist of the following: (1) Legal and Procedural Documents (a) Advertisement for Bids (b) Information for Bidders (c) Bid (d) Proposal Guaranty (e) Contract (f) Performance Bond (g) Payment Bond (h) Affidavit of Non-Collusion (i) Certificate of Insurance (j) Notice of Award (k) Notice to Proceed (2) Special Provisions (3) Specifications 191 GC-2 224769v1 (4) General Conditions (5) Plans (6) Addenda (7) Supplemental Agreements & Change Orders 1.08 PERFORMANCE BOND: The Contractor's Performance Bond required by the Contract Documents. 1.09 PAYMENT BOND: The Contractor’s Payment Bond required by the Contract Documents. 1.10 CONTRACT PRICE: The total moneys payable to the Contractor under the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. 1.11 CONTRACTOR: The person, firm or corporation with whom the Owner has executed the contract agreement. 1.12 DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING: Refers to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) drug use and alcohol testing rules published February 15, 1994, which apply to persons required to have a commercial driver's license (CDL). 1.13 CITY ENGINEER: The City of Chanhassen’s employee in charge of overseeing all capital projects and engineering matters. 1.14 ENGINEER: The duly authorized engineering representative of the Owner, acting directly or through his/her designated representatives who have been delegated the responsibility for engineering project administration. 1.15 FIELD ORDER: A written order affecting a change in the work not involving an adjustment in the contract price or an extension of the contract time, issued by the Engineer to the Contractor during construction. 1.16 GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY: A governmental unit other than the Owner having jurisdiction of the premises. 1.17 INSPECTOR: An authorized representative of the Engineer, assigned to make any or all necessary inspections of the work performed and the materials furnished by the Contractor. 1.18 LABORATORY: The testing laboratory of the Owner or any other testing laboratory which may be designated by the Owner. 1.19 NOTICE OF AWARD: The written notice of the acceptance of the bid issued by the Owner to the successful bidder. 192 GC-3 224769v1 1.20 NOTICE TO PROCEED: The written notice issued by the Owner to the Contractor authorizing him to proceed with the work and establishing the date of commencement of the work. 1.21 OWNER: A private, public or quasi-public body or authority, corporation, association, partnership, or individual for whom the work is to be performed. 1.22 PLANS: The official drawings, plans, profiles, typical cross sections and supplemental drawings, or reproductions thereof, prepared by the Engineer, which show the location, character, dimensions and details of work to be performed. All such drawings, as listed elsewhere in the Contract Documents, are a part of the plans whether attached to the Contract Documents or separate therefrom. 1.23 PROJECT: The undertaking to be performed as provided in the Contract Documents. 1.24 PROPOSAL FORM: The approved form on which the contracting authority requires bids to be prepared and submitted for the work. 1.25 PROPOSAL GUARANTY: The security furnished with a bid to guarantee that the bidder will enter into the Contract if the bid is accepted. 1.26 SHOP DRAWINGS: All drawings, diagrams, framework plans, falsework plans, erection plans, illustrations, brochures, schedules and other data which are prepared by the Contractor, a subcontractor, manufacturer, supplier or distributor, which illustrate how specific portions of the work shall be fabricated or installed. 1.27 SPECIAL PROVISIONS: Contract requirements specific to the project which are not otherwise thoroughly or satisfactorily detailed and set forth in the detail specifications or plans. 1.28 SPECIFICATIONS: The directions, provisions, and requirements contained herein, together with all written agreements made or to be made pertaining to the method and manner of performing the work, or to the quantities and qualities of materials to be furnished under the contract. 1.29 SUBCONTRACTOR: An individual, firm, or corporation to whom the contractor sublets part of the Contract. 1.30 SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION: That date as certified by the Engineer when the construction of the project or a specified part thereof is sufficiently completed, in accordance with the Contract Documents, so that the project or specified part can be utilized for the purposes for which it is intended. 1.31 SUPPLEMENTAL GENERAL CONDITIONS: Modifications to generate conditions required by a local, state or federal agency for participation in the project and approved by the agency in writing prior to inclusion in the Contract Documents. 193 GC-4 224769v1 1.32 SUPPLIER: Any person, or organization who supplies materials or equipment for the work, including that fabricated to a special design, but who does not perform labor at the site. 1.33 SURETY: The person, firm, or corporation who executes the proposal guaranty or the contract bond. 1.34 TIME OF COMPLETION: The date set in Contract Documents for completion of the work; or number of working or calendar days after notice to proceed set out in Contract Documents (See also Section 8.07 of the General Conditions). 1.35 WORK: The furnishing of all labor, materials, equipment, and other incidentals necessary or convenient to the successful completion of the project and the carrying out of all duties and obligations imposed by the contract upon the Contractor. 1.36 WORKING DAYS: Any day, excluding Saturday, Sunday or State recognized Legal Holidays, when weather conditions or the results of weather conditions will allow the Contractor to pursue, for two hours between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. with the normal working force, any item or items of work which would be in progress at that time. 194 GC-5 224769v1 SECTION 2.00 - BIDDING REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 2.01 QUALIFICATIONS OF BIDDERS If requested, bidders must present satisfactory evidence that they are familiar with the class of work specified, and that they are provided with the necessary capital, tools, machinery and other equipment necessary to conduct the work and complete the improvement within the time specified in the proposal, in a good and workmanlike manner and to the entire satisfaction of the Owner. The Owner will review the qualifications and experience of bidders after bids are opened and before a contract is awarded, to determine if the bidder is "responsible." A "responsible" bidder is a bidder qualified to do the work. This will be determined by assessing the bidder's skill, resources, experience, successful performance of similar contracts (on time and on budget), and all other matters bearing upon the likelihood that the contract will be successfully completed. In all cases where a bidder is unknown or where there are any questions about the qualifications of the bidder, the following information may be required of the apparent low bidder: A. Identify all similar public projects in which you were the contractor. If you have had more than five such contracts, list only the last five contracts, and as to each contract identified, provide the following information: Project Description: Date: Contact Person at City/County/State: Were change orders in excess of 5% requested? If yes, explain the circumstances. Were liquidated damages assessed? If yes, explain the circumstances. Was the project completed on schedule? If no, explain the circumstances. B. Describe all construction arbitration claims and any construction or project litigation in which you have been a party in the last five years. C. Identify all public projects you have had with the City of Chanhassen in the last five years. D. In the last five years, has a bonding company ever refused to issue you a performance bond? If yes, explain the circumstances. E. In the last five years, have any claims been filed against a performance or payment bond that you have provided a public entity? If yes, explain the circumstances. 195 GC-6 224769v1 F. In the last five years, has your firm or any of its owners or employees been fined by a federal or state agency for a contract or workplace matter (such as wage or hour or safety violations), or debarred under Part 29, Title 49 CFR or any other law from submitting bids on public projects? If yes, explain the circumstances. G. In the last five years, has your firm or any of its owners or employees been charged or convicted of a crime involving the awarding, bidding or performance of a government contract? If yes, provide full details. The bidder agrees that they are fully responsible to the Owner for the acts and omissions of any proposed subcontractors and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as they are for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by them. Failure on the part of any bidder to carry out previous contracts satisfactorily, or lack of experience or equipment necessary for the satisfactory completion of the project, may be deemed sufficient cause for disqualification. 2.02 CONTRACT DOCUMENT INTERPRETATIONS All applicable laws, ordinances, and the rules and regulations of all authorities having jurisdiction over construction of the project shall apply to the contract throughout, and the Contractor shall be responsible for familiarizing themselves with all permits, bond and other requirements for the work to be performed. All work shall be performed in accordance with the most recent version of the City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. In the event a work item is not addressed in the Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates, the most recent version of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications shall govern. Whenever reference is made to the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications, the word “Owner” shall be substituted for “State” and “Department” where appropriate and the word “Engineer” is understood to refer to the engineer for the Owner. The City of Chanhassen Standard Plates included as part of these Specifications take precedence over the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Plates in all instances of conflict. If any person contemplating the submitting of a bid for a proposed contract is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of the plans, specifications or other proposed Contract Documents, they may submit to the Engineer a written request for an interpretation thereof at least three days prior to the scheduled bid opening. The persons submitting the request will be responsible for prompt delivery to the Engineer. Any interpretation of the proposed documents shall be made by addendum, duly numbered and dated. A copy of such addendum will be posted to QuestCDN, and each bidder shall acknowledge receipt of that addendum on their proposal form. Such addendum will be attached to all documents issued after the date of the addendum and shall remain a part thereof. The Owner and Engineer will not be responsible for any other explanation or interpretation. The Owner reserves the right to modify the plans, specifications, special provisions, or proposal at 196 GC-7 224769v1 any time prior to bids being opened, in accordance with the procedures for issuance of an addendum. All proposals shall be made and received with the express understanding that the Bidder accepts the terms and conditions contained in these instructions and the plans and specifications, forms of contract and bond, and any other Contract Documents referred to herein. If, after the bids have been delivered to the Owner, any difference of opinion shall arise as to the true intent or meaning of any part of the specifications, the decision of the Engineer shall be final, conclusive, and binding on all parties. 2.03 INTERPRETATION OF QUANTITIES IN BID SCHEDULE The schedule of quantities is approximate only and is assumed solely for the purpose of comparing bids. The quantities on which payment will be made to the Contractor are to be determined by measurements of the work actually performed by the Contractor as specified in the Contract Documents. 2.04 SITE INVESTIGATION Each bidder must satisfy themselves and form their own opinions by personal examination of the location and ground of the proposed work, and by such other means as they may desire, as to the actual conditions and requirements of the work, including the materials to be excavated; must make their own interpretations and satisfy themselves by their own investigations and research regarding all conditions affecting the work to be done and the labor and materials needed, and shall make their sole reliance thereon. Any information or data furnished by the Owner or its representatives is for the convenience of any bidder and is not guaranteed. The bidder shall thoroughly examine and familiarize themselves with the Drawings, Special Provisions, and all other Contract Documents. The Contractor, by the execution of the contract, shall accept all responsibility for having examined the site and acquainted themselves with the conditions there existing and the conditions of the contract. The Owner will be justified in rejecting any claim based upon the Contractor’s lack of proper examination of the site conditions and legal obligations of the contract after execution of the contract. 2.05 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL Sealed bids will be received by the Owner up to the date and hour as specified in the Advertisement for Bids at the office of the Owner or as otherwise specified. Bids received after the time specified shall be returned unopened. All bids must be in ink upon the bid form included in the Specifications with a given price for each item and aggregate amount for the work, and must be signed and acknowledged by the bidder in accordance with the directions on the bid form. If a separate proposal form is provided, this separate form is to be submitted, not the form bound into the specification book. In order to ensure consideration, the bid shall be enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to the Owner and clearly marked as to the time and date of bid opening, the name of the project, and name and address of bidder. 197 GC-8 224769v1 2.06 PROPOSAL GUARANTY Each bid shall be accompanied by a Proposal Guaranty in the form of a money order, certified check or bid bond, payable to the order of the owner in an amount not less than five percent (5%) of the total amount of the bid. No bid will be considered unless accompanied by the Proposal Guaranty. In case alternate bids are called for, one Proposal Guaranty in the amount of five percent (5%) of the total amount of the highest bid alternative will be sufficient for all bids. As soon as the bids have been tabulated, all Proposal Guarantees shall be returned to the bidders, except those of the three lowest responsible bidders, which shall be returned after the agreement is executed and the required bonds and insurance received, approved, and accepted by the Owner. 2.07 AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COLLUSION Each bidder shall submit with his/her proposal, an affidavit of non-collusion, signed by one of the officers of the firm and notarized. The Affidavit to be used is bound into these Contract Documents. A sample affidavit is included in the attachments. 2.08 WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS Any bid may be withdrawn or modified prior to the schedule time for the opening of bids or authorized postponement thereof. After the time set for opening of the bids, no bidder may, without the consent of the Owner, withdraw their bid or claim extra compensation or damages for any error or omission made by said bidder in preparing their bid, for a period of 60 days. Bid guarantees may be held by the Owner for said 60 days until all of the bids submitted have been canvassed, a contract awarded and executed, and the required bonds and insurance furnished and approved. Should there be reasons why the contract cannot be awarded within the specified period, the time may be extended by mutual agreement between the Owner and the bidder. 198 GC-9 224769v1 SECTION 3.00 - AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT 3.01 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS The bids from each responsible bidder will be considered on the basis of the amounts as shown on the bid form, and awarded to the lowest bidder determined by correctly adding the products resulting from correctly multiplying the quantities stated by the unit prices bid therefore, and as otherwise described in the Special Provisions when alternate bids are included in the proposal form. The prices are to include the furnishing of all materials; all labor and services necessary or proper for the completion of work, except such as may be otherwise expressly provided in the Contract Documents. The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids or to accept the bid deemed in the best interest of the Owner. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any bid which is incomplete, obscure, or irregular may be rejected; any bid having erasures or corrections in the price sheet may be rejected; any bid which omits an amount on any one or more items in the price sheet may be rejected; any bid in which unit prices are obviously unbalanced may be rejected; any bid accompanied by an insufficient or irregular bid bond may be rejected; any bid which omits acknowledgment of the receipt of addenda may be rejected. The Owner may make such investigations as deemed necessary to determine the ability of the bidder to perform the work, and the bidder shall furnish to the Owner all such information and data for this purpose as the Owner may request. The Owner reserves the right to reject any bid if the evidence submitted by, or investigation of, such bidder fails to satisfy the Owner that such bidder is properly qualified to carry out the obligations of the Agreement and to complete the work contemplated therein. All bids shall be subject to review and approval of the Owner. 3.02 CONTRACT AWARD AND EXECUTION Following acceptance of the bid by the Owner, a “Notice of Award” letter will be mailed to the Contractor together with the prepared contract agreements for signature and return. The Notice of Award letter will specify that the Contractor also submit affidavits or copies of insurance coverage, a payment bond and a performance bond. No contract will be executed until the required affidavits and bonds are submitted and have been approved as to form by the Owner. The performance bond and payment bond shall each be in the amount of 100 percent of the contract price with a corporate surety approved by the Owner. Attorneys-in-fact who sign bid bonds or performance bonds must file with each bond a certified and effective dated copy of their power of attorney. For purposes of the agreement, affidavit of insurance, the payment bond, and performance bond, the contract amount is the bid amount accepted by the Owner. The final amount of the contract shall be determined by summation of multiplying and summing the resulting product of the final measured quantities of the various items actually constructed and installed by the unit prices stated therefore, in the manner prescribed in the specification. The party to whom the contract is awarded will be required to execute the Agreement, obtain the affidavits, the payment bond, and the performance bond, and return them to the Engineer within 199 GC-10 224769v1 10 calendar days from the date when Notice of Award is delivered to the bidder. In case of failure of the bidder to complete these items, the Owner may at their option consider the bidder in default, in which case the bid guaranty accompanying the proposal shall become the property of the Owner. The Owner within 10 calendar days of receipt of acceptable performance and payment bonds, affidavits and Agreement signed by the bidder to whom the Agreement was awarded shall sign the Agreement and return to the bidder an executed duplicate of the Agreement. Should the Owner not execute the Agreement within such period, the bidder may by written notice withdraw their signed Agreement. Such notice of withdrawal shall be effective upon receipt of the notice by the Owner. A notice to proceed shall be issued within 10 calendar days of the execution of the Agreement by the Owner. Should there be reasons why the Notice to Proceed cannot be issued within such period, the time may be extended by mutual agreement between the Owner and Contractor. If the Notice to Proceed has not been issued within the 10 calendar day period or within the period mutually agreed upon, the Contractor may terminate the Agreement without further liability on the part of either party. The Notice of Award letter is not an order to proceed. The Contractor will have no authority to perform work under this contract until all Contract Documents as indicated above are properly completed and placed on file at the Owner’s Offices and a Notice to Proceed is issued by the Owner. A Notice to Proceed with the work under this project will be sent to the Contractor upon satisfaction of the above-indicated requirements and after a preconstruction conference is held. 3.03 PROPOSAL ALTERNATES When a project includes a bid alternate, all bidders are required to submit pricing for said alternate as a part of their bid. The Owner reserves the right to accept or reject any or all of the individual items included as a part of the bid alternate. The Owner-accepted bid alternate items’ prices will be considered as part of the low bid determination for contract award. If all alternates are rejected, the lowest base bid submitted will be considered the low bid for purposes of contract award. 3.04 CONTRACT SECURITY & GUARANTY The successful bidder shall be required to furnish the Owner with a performance bond and payment bond in the form required by law, each in an amount of one hundred (100%) percent of the contract amount, based on the lump sum or the anticipated quantities and unit prices, as determined by the Engineer. The bonds shall guarantee the proper prosecution and completion of the work by the successful bidder; and shall further guarantee the prompt payment by the successful bidder or all persons or firms furnishing labor, tools, materials and supplies for the work. Upon completion of said work, an acceptable and separate 100% maintenance bond shall be furnished to guarantee the quality of material and workmanship of said work for a period of two years from the date of final acceptance by the City. The Contractor may not release the surety company on this 100% maintenance bond until a written release of said 100% maintenance bond is 200 GC-11 224769v1 given by the Owner. When a period of two years has elapsed after the date of the acceptance of the work by the Owner and if upon inspection by the Owner the work is found in good condition the maintenance bond shall be released. If it is found by the inspection after two years use that some of the work and some of the materials are defective, such work or materials shall be replaced or repaired by the Contractor, and only when the Contractor has properly replaced and repaired such defective work and/or materials will the Owner then release the 100% maintenance bond. In the event that the Contractor fails to meet the time obligations of the initial maintenance bond and requests an extension of time, a $1,000 escrow will be required to offset additional costs incurred by the Owner to administrate the maintenance bond extension. 3.05 PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE Prior to the start of any work there shall be a pre-construction conference arranged by the Engineer. Representatives of the Owner, Engineer, Developer, Contractor, Subcontractor, Project Foreman, and Utility Companies shall be notified to be present at this meeting. The Contractor's project superintendent shall be familiar with all phases of the work to be executed and shall oversee the work during its progress. The project superintendent shall represent the Contractor, and communications and directions given to the superintendent shall be as binding as if given to the Contractor. The Contractor's list of subcontractors and suppliers shall be submitted and reviewed along with scheduling, materials (including bituminous mix design), material sources, proposed haul routes, construction methods, desired materials substitutions, and any other information necessary for the orderly execution of the work. The specifications and certifications for all products, materials and supplies furnished shall be submitted for review prior to the preconstruction conference. 3.06 FAILURE TO EXECUTE CONTRACT Failure on the part of the successful bidder to execute the Contract, furnish an acceptable bond, or comply with any other requirements imposed precedent to the Contract, within the time allowed, shall be considered just cause for cancellation of the award and forfeiture of the Proposal Guaranty, not as a penalty, but in liquidation of damages sustained. Award may then be made to the next lowest responsible bidder, or the work may be re-advertised or otherwise performed at the discretion of the Owner. 201 GC-12 224769v1 SECTION 4.00 - SCOPE OF WORK 4.01 ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS If the instructions and plans are not sufficiently clear to permit the Contractor to proceed with the work, the Engineer shall, upon the request of the Contractor, furnish additional written instruction, together with additional drawings as may be necessary. When such request is made by the Contractor, it must be in ample time to permit the preparation of the instructions and drawings by the Engineer before the construction of the work covered by them is undertaken. Such additional instructions and drawings shall be consistent with the Contract Documents and shall have the same force and effect as if contained in the original Contract Documents. For the purpose of avoiding delays in the preparation of such additional instructions and drawings, the Engineer and the Contractor shall jointly prepare a schedule showing the time for the commencement of the work to be included in them and the time the Contractor shall furnish the necessary shop drawings which may be necessary for their preparation. The Contractor shall do no work without proper drawings or instructions and shall replace any work not in accordance with such drawings and instructions at no additional cost. 4.02 CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS IN THE WORK The Owner, without invalidating the contract, may order extra work or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from the work; the contract sum being adjusted according to the respective unit bid prices. All such work shall be executed under the conditions of the original contract, except that any claim for extension of time caused thereby shall be adjusted at the time of ordering such change. If the Contractor claims that any instructions by drawings or otherwise issued after the date of the contract involved extra cost under the contract, the Engineer shall be given written notice thereof within seven days, after the receipt of such instructions, and in any event before proceeding to execute the work, except emergency endangering life or property, and the procedure shall then be as provided for elsewhere herein for changes in the work. No such claim shall be valid unless so made. In giving instructions, the Engineer shall have authority to make minor changes in the work, not involving extra cost, and not inconsistent with the purposes of the work but otherwise (except in an emergency endangering life or property) no extra work or change shall be made unless in pursuance of a written order by the Engineer. 4.03 ORAL AGREEMENTS No oral order, objection, claim or notice by any party to the others shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations contained in any of the contract documents, and none of the provisions of the Contract Documents shall be held to be waived or modified by reason of any act whatsoever, other than by a definitely agreed waiver or modification thereof in writing, signed by the parties to be bound or by the representatives of the parties authorized to enter into such a waiver or modification, and no evidence shall be introduced in any proceeding of any other waiver or modification. 202 GC-13 224769v1 4.04 INTERPRETATIONS AND CHANGE ORDERS No oral interpretation shall be made to the Contractor as to the meaning of any of the Contract Documents or to modify any of the provisions of the Contract Documents. Every request for an interpretation shall be made in writing and addressed and forwarded to the Engineer. The Owner will not be responsible for any other explanation or interpretation of the plans and specifications. If unforeseen conditions require a change in the dimensions of a structure, location of underground pipes, or major variations of a similar nature from the original plans, necessitating exceeding the reasonable limits defined above, or being of the nature of a substantial departure from the original plans, such change shall be covered by a change order. The change order is to set forth in complete detail the nature of the change and reasons therefore. The compensation to be paid the Contractor and whether it is an addition or a reduction with respect to the original contract costs is also to be covered in detail. Should additional or supplemental drawings be required, they will be furnished by the Engineer. 4.05 SALVAGE Unless otherwise indicated on the plans or in the Special Provisions, all castings, pipe and any other material taken from the work shall be the property of the Contractor. 4.06 FOSSILS If any fossils, treasure or other unusual or valuable geological formations are found in the progress of excavating, such fossils, treasure or samples of geological formations shall be carefully preserved by the Contractor and the Contractor shall restrict or suspend operations in the immediate area of the discovery and shall immediately notify the Engineer of the discovery. The suspension of work for a period not to exceed 72 hours shall be allowed without claim by the Contractor for any damages as a result thereof. These items shall become the property of the state or federal agency concerned with their preservation and study. 4.07 CLEANUP The Contractor shall, at no cost to the Owner, clean up and remove all refuse and unused materials of any kind resulting from the work. Upon failure to do so within 72 hours after request by the Engineer, the work may be done by the Owner and cost thereof be charged to the Contractor and deducted from the final estimate. 203 GC-14 224769v1 SECTION 5.00 - CONTROL OF WORK 5.01 ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY The Engineer is responsible for the general supervision and direction of the inspection. The Engineer will decide all questions regarding: · Quality and acceptability of materials furnished and work performed. · Manner of performance and rate of progress of the work. · Interpretation of the Plans, Specifications, and Special Provisions. · Measurement, control of quantities, and the amount of any deductions or adjustments to be made in payment. · Acceptable fulfillment of all Contract Provisions on the part of the Contractor. The Engineer is not responsible for the acts or omissions of the Contractor's superintendent or employees. The Engineer shall, within a reasonable time after receiving written notification, make decisions in writing on all claims of the Owner or the Contractor and on all other matters relating to the execution and progress of the work or the interpretation of the Contract Documents. All such decisions of the Engineer shall be final, except where time or financial considerations are involved, in which case, the decision is subject to arbitration (if less than $10,000) as per these general conditions. Any dispute over $10,000 shall be settled in Carver County District Court. Failure to condemn any inferior material or work at the time of its use or construction shall not be construed as an acceptance of the same, but the Contractor shall upon notice from the Engineer at any time prior to the final acceptance of the improvement immediately tear out, remove and properly reconstruct, at no cost to the Owner, any portion of this improvement which the Engineer may decide to be defective and the Contractor will be held wholly responsible for the safety, proper construction and perfection of the entire improvement until the same has been finally accepted and paid for by the Owner. The Engineer will make final inspection of all work included in the contract or any portion thereof, as soon as practicable after notification by the Contractor that such work is nearing completion. If such work is not acceptable to the Engineer at the time of the inspection, the Contractor will be advised in writing as to the particular defects to be remedied before such work can be accepted. If, within a period of ten days after such notification, the Contractor has not taken steps to speedily complete the work as directed, the Engineer may, without further notice and without in any way impairing the contract, make such other arrangements as deemed necessary to have such work completed in a satisfactory manner without regard to remaining contract completion time. The cost of completing such work shall be deducted from any moneys due, or which may become due the Contractor on the contract. 204 GC-15 224769v1 5.02 INTENT OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The intent of the plans and specifications is that the Contractor furnishes all labor and materials, equipment and transportation necessary for the proper execution of the work unless specifically noted otherwise. The Contractor shall do all the work shown on the plans and described in the specifications and all incidental work necessary to complete the project in an acceptable manner and to fully complete the work or project, ready for use, occupancy and operation of the Owner. It is further the intention of the plans and specifications to set forth requirements of performance, type of equipment and structures, and standards of materials and construction, to require new material and equipment unless otherwise indicated and to require complete performance of the work without specific reference to any minor component part. It is not intended, however, that materials or work not covered by the specifications shall be supplied unless distinctly so noted. Materials or work described in words, which so applied have a well-known technical or trade meaning, shall be held to refer to such recognized standards. All work shall be completed in accordance with the specifications and plans, and in compliance with applicable laws of Federal, State and local governments. 5.03 SHOP DRAWINGS The Contractor shall, upon request, submit shop drawings in quadruplicate for the approval of the Engineer. 5.04 DIMENSIONS Figured dimensions on the plans will be used in preference to scaling the drawings. Where the work of the Contractor is affected by finish dimensions or manufacturer's equipment, these shall be determined by the Contractor at the site, and s/he shall assume the responsibility therefore. 5.05 MODELS All models prepared for this work, in accordance with requirements of plans and specifications, shall become the property of the Owner at the completion of the work. 5.06 ADEQUACY OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The complete requirements of the work to be performed under the contract shall be set forth in plans and specifications to be supplied by the Owner through the Engineer or by the Engineer as representative of the Owner. 5.07 CONFLICT In the case of a conflict of meaning between any of the terms of the Contract Documents, the provisions of the document listed first below over those of a document listed later: 1. Contract Agreement Form 2. Special Provisions 205 GC-16 224769v1 3. Plans 4. Specifications 5. General Conditions 6. Bid 7. Bid Form Special provisions and detail plans are intended to modify and prevail over standard plans and specifications. 5.08 DISCREPANCIES IN PLANS The drawings, specifications, and other parts of the plans are intended to complement one another. Anything shown on the drawings but not mentioned in the specifications, or vice versa, or anything not expressly set forth in either but which is reasonably implied, shall be furnished as though specifically shown and mentioned in both without any extra charge. Should anything be omitted from the drawings and necessary to the proper construction of the work herein described, it shall be the duty of the Contractor to notify the Engineer prior to beginning work; and in the event of the Contractor failing to give such notice, the Contractor shall make good any damage or defect in work caused thereby, without extra charge to the owner. Questions as to meaning of plans and specifications shall be interpreted by the Engineer, whose decisions shall be final and binding on all parties concerned. (See also Section 5.01 of these General Conditions.) The Engineer will provide the Contractor with such information as may be required to show revised or additional details of construction. The Engineer will provide full information when errors or omissions in the plans and specifications are discovered. Any work done by the Contractor, after discovery of such discrepancies, errors or omissions and prior to a decision by the Engineer, shall be done at the Contractor's risk. 5.09 SEPARATE CONTRACTS The Owner reserves the right to let other contracts in connection with this work. The Contractor shall afford other Contractors reasonable opportunity for the introduction and storage of their materials and the execution of their work and shall properly connect and coordinate the work with that of other contractors. If any part of the Contractor's work depends for proper execution or results upon the work of any other Contractor, the Contractor shall inspect and promptly report to the Engineer any defects in such work that render it unsuitable for such proper execution and results. Failure to so inspect and report shall constitute an acceptance of the other Contractor's work. To insure the proper execution of the work, the Contractor shall measure work already in place and shall at once report to the Engineer any discrepancy between the executed work and the drawings. 5.10 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AT JOB SITE One complete set of all plans and specifications shall be maintained by the Contractor at the job site and shall be available to the Engineer at all times. 206 GC-17 224769v1 The Owner retains the right of access to all plans, specifications and drawings. 5.11 MOVING OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES The Owner will give reasonable notice to all affected utility companies of the potential necessity of movement of their installations prior to commencement of the work. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to coordinate the work with the utility companies. It is provided that no utility, private or public, shall be moved to accommodate the Contractor's equipment or the method of operation when such utility does not conflict with the installation of the improvement under construction unless the costs of such removal shall be at the expense of the Contractor. The Contractor shall notify the proper representatives of any public utility, corporation, and company or individual, not less than 48 hours in advance of any work which might damage or interfere with the operation of their or his/her property along or adjacent to the work. 5.12 PROTECTION OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES Prior to construction, the Contractor shall obtain field locations or other assistance as may be required to determine the existence and location of gas main and other private utilities as well as public utilities of the City, County, or State which may be underground or overhead within street and highway right of way or within easements and which may be interfered with under this contract. In cases where the alignment, as shown on the plans, coincides with the existing location of either an overhead or underground privately owned utility so that, in the opinion of the Engineer, the relocation of said utility is required to complete the installation, the Owner shall provide for such relocation unless specified otherwise in the Special Provisions. Existing underground, surface or overhead structures are not necessarily shown on the plans. Those shown are only approximate and no responsibility is assumed by the Owner or the Engineer for the accuracy of location. The Contractor shall make such investigations as are necessary to determine the extent to which existing structures may interfere with the work contemplated under this contract. The sizes, locations and depths of such structures as are shown on the plans and profiles are only approximate and the Contractor shall verify the accuracy of the information given. The Contractor shall support and protect by timbers or otherwise, all pipes, conduits, poles, wires or other apparatus which may be in any way affected by the work. At all shaft sites and on all open cut work, the Contractor shall provide and maintain free access to fire hydrants, water and gas valves, manholes and similar facilities. Gutters and waterways shall be kept open or other satisfactory provisions made for the removal of the storm water. 207 GC-18 224769v1 The Contractor shall provide as incidental to the work all methods for adequately draining the work and shall assume full responsibility and liability for damage to any persons or property resulting from such damage. No trees shall be cut except upon the specific authority of the Engineer. Trees adjacent to the work shall be protected from all damage by the construction operations. Storm and sanitary sewers must be carefully protected from any sand or debris and any such deposition caused by the Contractor's operations must be removed from the manholes and pipes by the Contractor. Prior to construction commencement, the Contractor shall notify the Owner and conduct an inspection of potentially affected existing public utilities noting conditions such as sand in manholes or damaged valve boxes prior to the Contractor's construction. Once construction has commenced it will be assumed that all damage to surface and underground installations not previously noted has been caused by the Contractor's operations. The Contractor will be responsible to make the necessary corrections and/or repairs. 5.13 DAMAGE TO EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OR UTILITIES If, through the Contractor's operations, any of said pipes, conduits, poles, wires, or apparatus should be damaged, they shall be repaired by the authorities having control of same, and the expense of such repairs shall be charged to the Contractor. The Contractor shall indemnify and save the Owner and Engineer harmless from claims for any damage done to any street or other public property; or to any private property by reason of breaking of any water pipe, sewer or gas pipe, electric conduit, or other utility by or through the Contractor’s negligence. The Contractor shall restore, or have restored at his/her own cost and expense, such property to a condition similar or equal to that existing before such damage or injury was done, by repairing, rebuilding, or otherwise restoring as may be directed, or shall make good such damage from injury in a manner acceptable to the Owner or the Engineer. In case of failure on the part of the Contractor to restore such property or make good such damage or injury, the Engineer may, upon 48 hours written notice under ordinary circumstances and without notice when a nuisance or hazardous condition results, proceed to repair, rebuild, or otherwise restore such property as may be determined necessary, and the cost thereof will be deducted from any moneys due to the Contractor under this contract and if not so deducted, the Contractor will be obligated to forth with reimburse the Owner for the cost thereof. The Contractor shall indemnify and save the Owner and Engineer harmless from claims brought for or on account of any damage, maintenance, removal or replacement, or relocation of mains, conduits, pipes, wires, cables or other such structures of private utility firms or corporations, whether underground or overhead, that may be caused or required by the Contractor during the time the work is in progress. 208 GC-19 224769v1 The Contractor shall not claim or be entitled to receive compensation for any damages sustained by reason of the inaccuracy or the omission of any of the information given on the drawings, relative to the surface, overhead, or underground structures or by reason of the Contractor’s failure to properly protect and to maintain such structures. The Contractor is to exercise extreme care in crossing or working adjacent to all utilities and shall be responsible to protect and maintain their operation during the time the work is in progress. The Contractor shall restore, at no cost to the Owner, any public structures such as water mains, water connections and appurtenances, sewers, manholes, catch basins and sewer connections which are damaged or injured in any way by his/her acts. No trees shall be removed without permission of the Engineer. No compensation will be paid for cutting down, removing and disposing of shrubs. Any trees or shrubs deemed savable will be field located by the Engineer and shall be fully protected by this Contractor during construction. Any trees removed or damaged by the Contractor, which were deemed savable by the Engineer, will be replaced at the Contractor's expense with a new tree as near in size and kind as possible, but never larger than 6" caliper as measured six inches (6”) above the ground surface. All trimming of trees has to be approved by the Engineer. All trees damaged during construction shall be trimmed and repaired. The following procedures shall be adhered to when constructing utilities near trees. A. Cut roots cleanly. B. Backfill trench as soon as possible; do not leave the roots exposed to air. C. No equipment or construction materials shall be stored beneath a tree's drip line. D. Clean up around trees immediately after construction. 5.14 MONUMENTS AND STAKES The Contractor shall not disturb any monuments or stakes found on the line of this improvement until ordered by the Engineer. The Engineer will furnish and set all new monuments or stakes required along the line of this improvement, but the Contractor will be responsible for their protection. In case any monument or stake is disturbed by the Contractor without orders from the Engineer, the Contractor will be charged with cost of the survey and other work required to relocate the same. Prior to the start of construction, the Contractor shall give the Engineer five working days written notice when s/he requires the services of the Engineer for laying out any portion of the work is required. After the start of construction, the Contractor shall give the Engineer 48 hours’ notice, not including Saturday or Sunday, when s/he requires the services of the Engineer for laying out any portion of the work is required. 209 GC-20 224769v1 5.15 INSPECTORS Inspectors may be appointed by the Engineer or Owner subject to approval by the City Engineer to see that the work is performed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Inspector qualifications shall be submitted in writing to the City Engineer. 5.16 EXAMINATION OF COMPLETED WORK At the request of the Engineer, the Contractor at any time before acceptance of the work shall remove or uncover such portions of the finished work as requested. After examination, the Contractor shall restore said portions of the work to the standard required by the specifications. Should the work thus exposed or examined prove acceptable, the uncovering or removing, and the replacing of the covering or making good of the parts removed shall be paid for as extra work, in accordance with requirements of Section 9.03 of the General Conditions; but should the work so exposed or examined prove unacceptable, the uncovering, removing and replacing shall be at the Contractor's expense. 5.17 OWNER'S RIGHT TO CORRECT DEFICIENCIES If the Contractor should neglect to execute the work properly or fail to perform any provision of this contract, the Owner after ten days' written notice to the Contractor may, without prejudice to any other remedy, make good such deficiencies and may deduct the cost thereof from the payment then or thereafter due the Contractor. 5.18 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE (A) Maintenance of Traffic The Contractor is responsible for maintenance, control, and safeguarding of traffic within and immediately abutting the project as further outlined herein, and as may otherwise be provided in the Special Conditions. The Contractor is responsible for maintenance, control, and safeguarding of traffic on all detours. The Owner reserves the right to select any detour routes and will coordinate with other governmental agencies. (B) Street Closures or Partial Closures Streets may be closed to through traffic but shall not be closed to traffic until such closure has been approved by the Owner. Street closures shall be made in such a manner as to provide for maximum public safety and public convenience. They shall be opened to through traffic at such times as the work has been completed, or as the Owner may direct. (C) Existing Traffic Signs and Facilities The Contractor will make all necessary adjustments to traffic signals and traffic signal activators at no cost to the Owner. Existing traffic and street name signs which will interfere with construction will be removed by the Contractor as required by the construction schedule. Upon completion of the project, the Contractor shall reset all such signs. (D) Detours & Haul Routes Contractors shall plan haul routes utilizing State Trunk Highways and County State Aid 210 GC-21 224769v1 Highways. Any requests to use City streets as haul routes shall be made in writing to the Engineer. The Engineer shall have the final decision to approve or disapprove haul route requests and impose road damage penalties as necessary. (E) Local and Emergency Traffic Local traffic shall be provided access to private properties at the end of each day, except during some urgent stages of construction when it is impracticable to carry on the construction and maintain access simultaneously, such as for the placing of bituminous pavement, placing and curing of Portland cement concrete, and utility excavations which prohibit safe travel of vehicular traffic. Emergency traffic such as police, fire and disaster units shall be provided reasonable access at all times. The Contractor shall notify the Owner 48 hours prior to proposed partial blockage or closure of any street or public right of way and shall place all necessary warning signs and provide all necessary flaggers. The Contractor shall notify the police/fire department 48 hours prior to the proposed blockage or closure of any street or public right of way. (F) Protection of Pedestrian and Vehicular Traffic The Contractor shall take every precaution to protect pedestrian and vehicular traffic. (G) Restriction of Parking Where parking is a hazard to through traffic or to the construction work, it shall be restricted either entirely or during the time when it creates a hazard. Signs for this purpose will be furnished and placed by the Contractor. The Contractor shall be responsible for and shall maintain the signs if they are used on any street which is directly involved in the construction work. If the no parking signs are to be used beyond the confines of the work area, such as another street being used as a detour, the signs will be the responsibility of the Contractor. (H) Flaggers The Contractor shall furnish at his/her own expense all flaggers. (I) Violations In the event the Contractor performing work violates any part this Section, the Contractor will be provided written notice to remediate the violation. If after a reasonable amount of time, which will be outlined in the written notice, has passed with no correction, the Contractor shall be charged an administrative penalty of $500.00 per day. If the violation is not remediated within 72-hours, all work associated with the violation must cease at once until traffic control is erected, inspected, and approved by the City Engineer. 5.19 TRAFFIC CONTROL WITHIN AND ABUTTING THE PROJECT The Contractor shall place and maintain all signs, barricades and warning lights within the limits of the project on all streets, alleys and driveways entering the project so that approaching traffic will turn right or left on existing undisturbed streets before reaching the warning signs and barriers immediately abutting the project. Barricades shall be furnished by the Contractor. The Contractor shall assume responsibility for 211 GC-22 224769v1 signs and traffic control devices beyond the limits herein before described. 5.20 REMOVAL OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, TOOLS AND SUPPLIES At the termination of this contract, before acceptance of the work by the Owner, the Contractor shall remove all equipment, tools and supplies from the property of the Owner. Should the Contractor fail to remove such equipment, tools and supplies, the Owner shall have the right to remove them. 5.21 SUSPENSION OF WORK BY ENGINEER When, in the judgment of the Engineer, unfavorable weather or any other condition makes it impractical to perform work in accordance with the contract, or should the Contractor fail to comply with the provisions of the contract or the requirements of the specifications, the Engineer may issue to the Contractor a written order to immediately suspend work and upon receipt of such notice, on that part of the contract work specified in said written order. When conditions are again favorable for prosecution of the work, the Engineer will issue to the Contractor a written order to resume the suspended work. Orders to suspend work will not be written for intermittent shutdowns due to weather conditions unless the suspension of work is to be for a period of time exceeding five working days. The Contractor shall be responsible for preventing any damage or unreasonable deterioration of the work during the time it is closed down. Suspension of the work by the Engineer is not grounds for claims by the Contractor for damages or extra compensation. Inspectors shall have authority to suspend all or a portion of the work which is not being properly performed and, subject to the final decision of the Engineer, to condemn and reject defective work and materials. Inspectors shall have authority to permit deviation from the plans and specifications and to suspend work as required for conformance with the plans and specifications. If requested by the Contractor, the suspension order will be given in writing. Inspectors shall not act as foremen or perform other duties for the Contractor. 5.22 SUSPENSION OF WORK BY OWNER The Owner may at any time suspend the work, or any part thereof, by giving ten days’ notice to the Contractor in writing. This work shall be resumed by the Contractor within ten days after the date fixed in a supplemental written notice from the Owner to the Contractor to do so. If the work, or any part thereof, shall be stopped by the notice in writing aforesaid, and if the Owner does not give a supplemental notice in writing to the Contractor to resume work at a date within a year of the date fixed in the written notice to suspend, then the Contractor may abandon that portion of the work so suspended, and s/he will be entitled to the estimates and payments for all work done on the portions so abandoned, if any. If suspension of all or part of the work, which is subsequently resumed, causes additional expenses not due to the fault or negligence of the Contractor, the Owner shall reimburse the Contractor for additional expense incurred due to suspension of the work. Claims for such compensation, with 212 GC-23 224769v1 complete substantiating records, shall be filed with the Owner within ten days after the date or order to resume work in order to receive consideration. This paragraph shall not be construed as entitling the Contractor to compensation for delays due to inclement weather, failure to furnish additional surety or sureties specified herein, for supervision made at the request of the Contractor, or for any other delay provided for in the Contract Documents. 213 GC-24 224769v1 SECTION 6.00 - CONTROL OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP 6.01 QUALITY OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS In order to establish standards of quality, the Engineer has, in the detailed specifications, referred to certain products by name and catalog number. This procedure is not to be construed as eliminating from competition other products of equal or better quality by other manufacturers where fully suitable in design. Whenever in these specifications, a material or article is specified by using the specific description or name of proprietary product, or name of a manufacturer or vendor, rather than by using descriptive detail or substance and function, any article which will perform the duties imposed adequately and to the same effectiveness as determined by the Engineer will be acceptable as a substitute in lieu of the material or articles so specified. Only materials conforming to the requirements of these specifications shall be used in the work. The source of any material shall not be changed at any time without the written approval of the Engineer. The Contractor may be required at any time to furnish a complete statement of the original, composition and manufacturer of any or all materials required in the work, or to submit samples of the same. Unless otherwise specified, all materials shall be new and both workmanship and material shall be of good quality. The Contractor shall, if required, furnish satisfactory evidence as to the kind and quality of materials or tools used in the work. All materials, supplies and articles furnished shall, whenever so specified, and otherwise wherever practicable, be the standard stock products of recognized reputable manufacturers. The specifications and certifications for all products, materials and supplies furnished shall be submitted for review prior to the preconstruction conference. The Contractor shall furnish a complete list of proposed desired substitutions, together with such engineering and catalog data as the Engineer may require. List and information must be submitted prior to submittal of first progress payment estimate. The Contractor shall abide by the Engineer's judgment when proposed substitute materials or items of equipment are judged to be unacceptable and shall furnish the specified material or item of equipment in such case. All proposals for substitutions shall be submitted in writing by the Contractor and not by individual trades or material suppliers. The Engineer will approve or disapprove proposed substitutions in writing within a reasonable time. No substitute materials shall be used unless so approved in writing. 6.02 TESTING All testing of materials and workmanship shall be conducted by a reputable and qualified firm totally independent of the contractor and owner. 214 GC-25 224769v1 6.03 USE OF PREMISES The Contractor shall confine equipment, storage of materials and operation of work to the limits indicated by law, ordinances, permits, easements or direction of the Engineer, and shall not unreasonably encumber the premises with said equipment and materials. 6.04 STORAGE OF MATERIALS Materials shall be stored so as to insure the preservation of their quality and fitness for the work and such materials, even though approved before storage, shall be subject to testing and must meet the requirement of these specifications at the time it is proposed to use them in the work. Materials shall be stored per the manufacturer’s recommendations in a safe manner that will facilitate inspection and be in compliance with all applicable permits and regulations. The portion of the right of way not required for public travel may, with the consent of the Engineer, be used for storage purposes and for the placing of the Contractor's plant and equipment; but any additional space required; unless otherwise stipulated, shall be provided by the Contractor at no cost to the owner. From the commencement of the work until the completion of the same, the Contractor shall be solely responsible for the care of the work covered by this contract and for the materials delivered at the site intended to be used in the work and all injury or damage to the same from whatever cause, shall be made good at the Contractor’s expense before the final estimate is made. The Contractor shall provide suitable means of protection for and shall protect all material intended to be used in the work and all work in progress as well as completed work. All necessary precautions shall be taken to prevent injury or damage to work in progress of construction by flood, freezing or from inclemency’s of the weather at any and all times and only approved methods shall be used for this purpose. 6.05 MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS Manufactured articles, material and equipment shall be applied, installed, connected, erected, used, cleaned and conditioned as directed by the manufacturer unless herein specified to the contrary. 6.06 REJECTED WORK AND MATERIALS All materials which do not conform to the requirements of the Contract Documents are not equal to samples approved by the Engineer, or are in any way unsatisfactory or unsuited to the purpose for which they are intended, shall be rejected and shall be removed immediately from the Project, unless otherwise permitted. No materials which have been rejected - the defects on which have been corrected or removed - shall be used until approval has been given. If the Contractor does not remove such condemned work and materials within a reasonable time fixed by written notice, the Owner may remove them and may store the materials at the expense of the Contractor. If the Contractor does not pay the expense of such removal within ten days thereafter, the Owner may, upon ten days' written notice, sell such materials at auction or at private sale and shall account for the net proceeds thereof, after deducting all the costs and expenses that should have been borne by the Contractor. The Contractor shall promptly remove from the premises all materials condemned by the Engineer as failing to conform to the contract, whether incorporated in the work or not and the Contractor 215 GC-26 224769v1 shall promptly replace and re-execute the work in accordance with the Contract Documents without expense to the Owner and shall bear the expense of making good all work of the other contractors destroyed or damaged by such removal or replacement. Work done contrary to or regardless of the instructions of the Engineer, work done without lines, grade or cross stakes and grades shown on the plans or as given by the Engineer, or any deviation made from the plans and specifications without written authority will be considered unauthorized and at the expense of the Contractor and will not be measured or paid for by the Owner. Any and all work so done may be ordered removed and replaced immediately at the Contractor's expense. 6.07 MATERIALS FURNISHED BY THE OWNER Materials specifically indicated will be furnished by the Owner. The fact that the Owner is to furnish material is conclusive evidence of its acceptability for the purpose intended and the Contractor may continue to use it until otherwise directed. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer upon discovering any defect in materials furnished by the Owner. Materials furnished by the Owner, which are not of local occurrence, will be provided at locations listed on plans or in specifications. After receipt of the material the Contractor shall be responsible for material loss or damage, including that caused by third parties. 6.08 MATERIALS FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR All materials used in the work shall meet the requirements of the respective plans and specifications. All materials not otherwise specifically indicated shall be furnished by the Contractor. 6.09 UNACCEPTABLE WORK & MATERIALS The Owner will consider all Work and Materials that do not meet the Contract requirements, or do not meet generally accepted industry standards if the Contract does not provide specific standards, to be unacceptable. For unacceptable Work resulting from poor workmanship, use of nonconforming Materials, damage through carelessness, or any other cause existing before final acceptance of the Work, the Owner will take one of the following actions, at the Engineer’s sole discretion: (1) Require the Contractor to acceptably correct the Work and Materials, immediately upon receipt of written order to do so (2) Allow the Work to remain in place and apply a monetary deduction to the Contract Unit Price (3) Decide the extent of acceptance for the Work to remain in place if a Contract Item fails to meet Contract requirements but is adequate to serve the design purpose, and document the basis of acceptance by Change Order to adjust the Contract Unit Price; the adjusted Contract Unit Price will be determined at the Engineer’s sole discretion (4) Require the Contractor to remove and replace the unacceptable Work at the Engineer’s sole discretion 216 GC-27 224769v1 The Owner may provide notice of default after the Contractor has been given proper notice to acceptably correct the Work and Materials, and has failed to do so. The Contractor shall remove and replace the unacceptable Work, or correct the Work, at no additional cost to the Owner if a Contract Item does not meet specified requirements and results in Work that does not serve the design purpose. 217 GC-28 224769v1 SECTION 7.00 - LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY TO PUBLIC 7.01 COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY Contractor shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage and maintain it at all times throughout the life of the Contract, with the City included as an additional name insured on a primary and non-contributory basis. The Contractor shall furnish the City a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the required coverage: Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Contractual Liability (identifying the contract): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Personal Injury, with Employment Exclusion deleted: $2,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non-owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence 7.02 CONSTRUCTION DAYS AND HOURS Construction hours, including pick-up and deliveries of material and equipment and the operation of any internal combustion engine, may only occur from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no such activity allowed on Sundays or on legal holidays. Contractors must require their subcontractors, agents and supplies to comply with these requirements and the Contractor is responsible for their failure to do so. Under emergency conditions, this limitation may be waived by the written consent of the City Engineer. If construction occurs outside of the permitted construction hours, the Contractor shall pay the following administrative penalties: First Violation Written Warning Second Violation $ 500.00 Third and Subsequent Violations $1,000.00 218 GC-29 224769v1 The Contractor expressly agrees to be responsible for, and to pay the Owner for the Inspector's hours and expenses for all inspection work required past the daily working hours, on weekends and legal holidays. The hourly rates will be in conformance with Engineer's current fee schedule. Overtime work is 1.5 times the hourly rate. Payment to the owner shall be made by deductions to the contractor's progress or final payments. 7.03 DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING All contractors and their subcontractors shall provide the City, prior to conducting any work, written verification of compliance with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) drug use and alcohol testing rules published February 15, 1994, which apply to persons required to have a commercial driver’s license (CDL). 7.04 WATER The Contractor shall make all arrangements with the City's Utility Superintendent for obtaining any water which may be needed for the construction. No water may be taken from any City hydrants unless authorized in writing by the Utility Superintendent. Failure to obtain City authorization will result in prosecution and fines within the limits of city ordinance. Access to private property shall be maintained/provided after 5:00 PM. Temporary mailboxes must be installed when the Contractor anticipates or the plans show as such. The Contractor must furnish, install, and remove temporary mailboxes. Temporary mailbox locations must be approved by the Engineer. 7.05 NOISE ELIMINATION The Contractor shall eliminate noise to as great an extent as possible at all times. Air compressing plants shall be equipped with silencers and the exhausts of all gasoline motors or other power equipment shall be provided with mufflers. 7.06 PATENTS All fees or royalties for patented invention, equipment, or arrangements that may be used in any manner connected with the construction or erection of the work, or any part thereof, shall be included in the price mentioned in the contract. 7.07 PRIVILEGES OF CONTRACTOR IN STREETS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS For the performance of the contract, the Contractor will be permitted to occupy such portions of streets or alleys, or other public places, or other rights-of-way, as shown on the plans or as permitted by the Engineer. A reasonable amount of tools, materials and equipment for construction purposes may be stored in such space, but not more than is necessary to avoid delays in construction. Excavated and waste materials shall be piled or stacked in such a way as not to interfere with spaces that may be designated to be left free and unobstructed, nor inconvenience occupants of adjoining property. Other Contractors of the Owner may, for all purposes required by their contracts, enter upon the work and premises used by the Contractor, and the Contractor shall give to other 219 GC-30 224769v1 Contractors of the Owner all reasonable facilities and assistance for the completion of adjoining work. Any additional ground desired by the Contractor for sole use shall be acquired by the Contractor at no cost to the Owner. Also, all maintenance and restoration costs shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. Where the work encroaches upon any right of way of any railway or state or county highway, the Owner shall apply for the necessary permits and the Contractor shall secure, pay the cost of all fees and provide bonds as required at no additional compensation. Where railway tracks or such highway are to be crossed, the Contractor shall observe all the regulations and instructions of the railway company and highway department as to methods of doing the work, or precautions for safety of property and the public. All negotiations with the railway company and highway department, except the right-of-way, shall be made by the Contractor at no cost to the Owner. The Contractor will not be paid direct compensation for such railway or highway crossing, unless so provided in the Special Conditions and Proposal. 7.08 DISCRIMINATION ON ACCOUNT OF RACE, CREED, OR COLOR The Contractor agrees that the provisions of State Statutes are as much a part of this contract as if fully set forth herein. 7.09 SAFETY Precautions shall be exercised at all times by the Contractor for the protection of persons, employees and property. The safety provisions of applicable laws and local building and construction codes shall be observed. The Contractor is solely responsible for the safety, proper construction and protection of the entire work until the same has been finally accepted and paid for by the Owner. The Contractor is responsible for conducting all work in compliance with the requirements of applicable state and federal laws, and the rules and regulations of such governmental agencies having jurisdiction over such operations. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for providing and maintaining at no additional cost to the Owner and on a 24-hour basis, all necessary safeguards such as temporary ladders, guard rails, protective fencing, shoring, bracing, dewatering, watchpersons, warning signs or signals, barricades and night lights at all unsafe places at or near the work. Provisions shall be made to prevent vehicles, pedestrians, and livestock from falling into open trenches or being otherwise harmed as a result of the work. Excavation in or adjacent to public streets or alleys in which water stands more than one foot deep shall be securely barricaded with snow fence so as to prevent access by small children at all times work is not being carried on at the site of excavation. Barricades shall be painted in a color that will be visible at night. From sunset to sunrise, the Contractor shall furnish and maintain at least two lights at each barricade. A sufficient number of barricades shall be erected to keep vehicles from being driven on or into any work under construction. The Contractor shall furnish watchpersons in sufficient numbers to protect the work. The Contractor shall in all cases maintain safe passageways at all road crossings, crosswalks and street intersections, and shall do all other things necessary to prevent accident or loss of any kind. 220 GC-31 224769v1 7.10 SANITARY PROVISIONS The Contractor shall provide and maintain in a neat and sanitary condition such accommodations for the use of employees as may be necessary to comply with the requirements and regulations of the governmental agency having jurisdiction there over. No public nuisance shall be permitted. Suitable sanitary conveniences for the use of all persons employed on the work, properly screened from public observation, shall be provided and maintained by the Contractor. 7.11 RAILROAD CROSSINGS Wherever a project is being constructed beneath, at grade or above railroad track, it shall be the Contractor's responsibility to contact the railroad company prior to constructing such crossings and to proceed with the construction as approved by the railroad company. The Contractor shall comply with all construction and additional insurance requirements of the railroad company. The Contractor shall hold the Owner and Engineer harmless from any and all damages resulting from operations in the construction at such crossings. 7.12 USE OF EXPLOSIVES Blasting will not be permitted in any case without specific authorization by the Owner, and then only under such restrictions as may be required by the proper authorities. If it is necessary to use explosives in the performance of the work, the Contractor shall take out permits and comply with all the laws, ordinances and regulations governing same. The Contractor shall fully protect all completed works as well as all overhead, surface or underground structures and shall be liable for any damage done to the work or to other structures on public or private property and injuries sustained by persons, by reason of the use of explosives in the operations. Explosives shall be handled, used and fired only by qualified people. All firing shall be done by electricity. All explosive supplies shall be safely stored and protected in an approved manner. All such storage places shall be marked clearly "DANGEROUS EXPLOSIVES". Caps or other exploders shall not be stored at the place where dynamite or other explosives are stored. 7.13 PRIVATE PROPERTY The Contractor shall not enter upon private property for any purpose without having previously obtained written permission from the property owner. The Contractor shall be responsible for the preservation of, and shall use every precaution to prevent damage to all trees, shrubbery, plants, lawns, sprinkler systems, fences, culverts, bridges, pavements, driveways, sidewalks, etc.; all water, sewer and gas lines; all conduits; all overhead pole lines or appurtenances thereof; and all other public or private property along or adjacent to the work. 7.14 RIGHT TO USE IMPROVEMENT The Owner shall have the right to open to traffic or public use any portion of this improvement prior to the final completion of the whole work, but the use of any part or portion of this 221 GC-32 224769v1 improvement by the Owner, by the public, or by any person or party, shall not be construed as acceptance of any portion of the work prior to the time of final completion and acceptance of the entire improvement. 7.15 CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall furnish all necessary machinery, tools, labor and material for every character required, and shall fully complete the work in accordance with the plan, specifications, and detail drawings, for the prices bid. The Contractor shall perform the entire work under the contract and assume the responsibility for and risk of all damages to the work or to property adjacent to or on the line of said work. The Contractor shall have charge of and be responsible for the entire project until its completion and acceptance. This includes the responsibility to maintain all stages of work in a safe and suitable condition at all times, including nights, weekends, and holidays. The Contractor shall make observations of the work during such periods as are necessary to insure proper care of the work. The Contractor is liable for any defects which may appear or be discovered before the final payment herein specified. The Contractor shall designate one person who shall have charge of the job and to whom the inspector may communicate. Whenever the Contractor is not present on the work, communications will be given to the superintendent or foreman in immediate charge of the work. Communications received shall be strictly obeyed. The Contractor shall be knowledgeable of and comply with the requirements of all pertinent permits and programs including, but not limited to, General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated With Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, other provisions of the Clean Water Act, MN Rules Chapters 7001 and 7090, MN Wetland Conservation Act, DNR Public Waters Program, and others. The Contractor shall submit, at such times as may reasonably be requested by the Engineer, schedules which shall show the order in which the Contractor proposes to carry on the work, with dates at which the Contractor will start the several parts of the work, and estimated dates of completion of the several parts. In accordance with the contract agreement, the Contractor and associated sureties shall indemnify the Owner and any and all of its officers, Engineers, and employees from any claims and demands or losses, damages, costs, charges and expenses of every nature and description, whether direct or indirect, because of the performance of this contract, including all injuries to workers or persons other than workers and for all property damages. The Contractor shall indemnify the Owner against any such loss or any liability of any nature, whether direct or indirect, and the Owner reserves the right to deduct from any money due the Contractor the amount of any judgment or claims therefore. The obligations of the Contractor do not extend to the liability of the consultant or Engineer, the consultant’s agents or employees arising out of the preparation or approval of maps, drawings, opinions, reports, surveys, change orders, designs or specifications which are certified by the Engineer. The approval of the above documents by the Engineer shall be subject to the conditions, limitations and exceptions stated on such documents and in contract documents. No approval of any document by the Engineer shall be implied. The Engineer shall not be deemed to have approved any document unless such document bears the Engineer's certificate or seal. 222 GC-33 224769v1 7.16 LANDS BY OWNER Where the work passes over or through private property, the Owner will secure right of way or easement. The Contractor shall not receive any extra compensation or be entitled to any extra payment because of delay on the part of the Owner in obtaining right of way or easement. 7.17 LANDS BY CONTRACTOR Any additional land and access thereto that may be required for temporary construction facilities or for storage of materials shall be provided by the Contractor with no liability to the Owner. The Contractor shall confine equipment and storage of materials and activities of workers to those areas described in the plans and specifications and such additional areas which may be provided as approved by the Engineer. 223 GC-34 224769v1 SECTION 8.00 - PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS 8.01 SUBCONTRACTS At the time specified by the Contract Documents or when requested by the Engineer, the Contractor shall submit-in writing to the Owner for approval the names of the subcontractors proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request of and with the approval of the Owner. The Contractor is responsible to the Owner for the acts and omissions of all employees and subcontractors hired by the Contractor. The Contract documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between any subcontractor and the Owner. The Contractor agrees to bind every subcontractor and every subcontractor agrees to be bound by the terms of the Contract Documents as far as applicable to the subcontractor’s portion of the work; including the following provisions of this section. The Contractor agrees to be bound to the subcontractor by all the obligations that the Owner assumes to the Contractor under the terms of said documents, and by all the provisions thereof affording remedies and redress to the Contractor from the Owner. The Contractor shall not assign, sublet, subcontract or transfer more than 50% of the total contract cost excluding "specialty items" without the written consent of the Owner. Any such assignment, subletting, or transfer shall not in any way relieve the Contractor of the responsibilities assumed under the contract, bonds, and guaranty. For convenience of reference and to facilitate the letting of contracts and subcontracts, the specifications are separated into title sections. Such separations shall not, however, operate to make the Engineer an arbiter to establish limits to the contracts between Contractor and subcontractor. 8.02 CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT A qualified superintendent shall be in control of the work at all times and give efficient supervision to the work until its completion. The superintendent shall have full authority to act in behalf of the Contractor, and all directions given to the superintendent shall be considered given to the Contractor. The Engineer's instructions may be confirmed in writing and shall be so confirmed upon written request of the Contractor. 8.03 CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES Incompetent or incorrigible employees shall be dismissed from the project by the Contractor or his/her representative when requested by the Engineer, and such persons shall not again be permitted to return to the project without the written consent of the Engineer. The foreman or other persons directing the work shall be competent, sober, and reliable, and shall extend every facility to the Engineer to enable to proper execution of the Engineer’s duties, and shall furnish such help as may be necessary to facilitate the inspection of materials. 224 GC-35 224769v1 8.04 INJUNCTIONS If by reason of any court proceedings, instituted by any third party or by the Owner affecting, directly or indirectly, the construction or completion of any portion or portions of this improvement, the Contractor or the Owner shall be unable to construct or complete any other portion or portions thereof, the Contractor shall, and does hereby waive any and all claims for damages because of such inability to complete the improvement as completed and file the final estimate thereon as provided for in the full completion of other improvements in the Owner, and the Contractor shall accept in full payment of the work upon said improvement, and as a cancellation of the contract thereof, a sum of money determined in strict accordance with the Contractor’s proposal for the contract, on the basis of the work actually completed up to the time of stopping thereof. 8.05 RIGHTS OF VARIOUS INTEREST Wherever work being done by the Owner's forces or by other Contractors is contiguous to work covered by this contract, the respective rights of the various interests involved shall be established by the Engineer, to secure the completion of the various portions of the work in general harmony. 8.06 WORK DURING AN EMERGENCY The Contractor shall perform any work and shall furnish and install any materials and equipment necessary during an emergency endangering life or property. In all cases, the Contractor shall notify the Engineer of the emergency as soon as practicable, but shall not wait for instructions before proceeding to properly protect both life and property. In cases where the Contractor cannot or does not meet the emergency, the Owner may take appropriate action to protect life and safety. 8.07 DELAYS AND EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME The Contractor herewith specifically waives claims for damages for any hindrance, delay, or change of sequencing. The Contractor will, in lieu thereof, be granted extensions of time for which liquidated damages will not be claimed by the Owner for the following causes: A delay caused the Contractor by any suit or other legal action against the Owner will entitle the Contractor to an equivalent extension of time unless the period of such delay exceeds 90 days. When such period is exceeded, the Owner will, upon request by the Contractor in writing, either terminate the contract, or grant a further extension of time, whichever as may at that time appear most desirable to both parties. If the Contractor is delayed at any time in the progress of the work by any act of neglect of the Owner or the Engineer or any employees of either, or by any other Contractor employed by the Owner, or by strike, fire, unusual delay in transportation, unavoidable casualties, or other causes beyond the Contractor's control, or by any cause which, in the opinion of the Engineer, shall justify the delay, then the time of completion shall be extended for such reasonable time as the Engineer may decide. No such extension shall be made for delay occurring more than seven days before claim therefore is made in writing to the Engineer. Shutdowns due to improper work, or otherwise due the Contractor's operation, are not cause for extension of time. 225 GC-36 224769v1 If during the term of this contract, the volume of the specified work, measured in dollars, is increased over the total value shown in the Contractor's proposal at the time the award of contract is made, the Contractor will be granted an extension proportionately equal to the increase in the total value. Should unforeseen conditions require the performance under an extra work order, the work more complex or difficult than that originally specified and shown on the plans, and such work, in the Contractor's opinion, requires more time to execute than the proportional increase in dollar value, the Contractor shall state to the Engineer, in writing, prior to the performance of such work, his/her estimate of the added time required for such work. The Owner will, if such estimate be reasonable, allow an added extension of time equal to the difference between the total time required and the proportional increase in the dollar value of the work. 8.08 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE & LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Contract and Owner recognize that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that Owner will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in the Contract, plus any extensions thereof allowed. The parties also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal or arbitration proceeding the actual loss suffered by Owner if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, Owner and Contractor agree that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), Contractor shall pay Owner a set charge based off the table below for each calendar day that expires after the time specified in the Contract for Completion until the Work is complete. Daily costs are based on MnDOT Table 1807.1-1, "Schedule of Liquidated Damages as follows: TABLE 1807.1-1 SCHEDULE OF LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Original Contract Amount Charge Per Cal. Day ($) From More Than ($) To and Including ($) 0 25,000 300 25,000 100,000 400 100,000 500,000 900 500,000 1,000,000 1,200 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,500 2,000,000 5,000,000 2,500 5,000,000 10,000,000 3,000 10,000,000 ---- 3,500 226 GC-37 224769v1 8.09 OWNER'S RIGHT TO TERMINATE CONTRACT & COMPLETE THE WORK The Owner has the right to terminate the employment of the Contractor for any of the following reasons: A. The Contractor is adjudged bankrupt, makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or becomes insolvent; B. Failure of Contractor to supply adequate properly skilled workers or proper materials; C. Failure of Contractor to make prompt payment to subcontractor for material or labor; D. Persistent and continuing disregard of laws, ordinances, or proper instructions of the Engineer; E. Assignment of work without permission of the Owner; F. Abandonment of the work by Contractor; G. Failure to meet the work progress schedule set forth in the contract; Termination of the contract shall be preceded by seven days written notice by the Owner to the Contractor and the surety stating the ground for termination and the measures if any which must be taken to assure compliance with the contract. The contract shall be terminated at the expiration of such seven day period unless the Owner shall withdraw its notice of termination. Upon termination of the contract by the Owner, the Owner may complete the work required by the contract by whatever means deemed expedient, including requiring the Contractor's surety to complete the work. The taking over of the work by the Owner upon contract termination shall not affect the right of the Owner to recover liquidated damages from the Contractor or the surety for failure to complete contract. In the event that the Contractor involuntarily abandons the work, fails or refuses to complete the work embodied in the contract or fails to pay just claims for labor or material, the Owner reserves the right to charge against the Contractor all extra legal, engineering, or other costs resulting from such abandonment, failure or refusal. Legal costs will include the Owner's cost of prosecuting or defending any suit in connection with such abandonment, failure or refusal, and nonpayment of claims wherein the Owner is made codefendant, and the Contractor agrees to pay all such costs, including reasonable attorney's fees. When the Owner assumes control of the work under the contract pursuant to termination, the Owner may take possession of the work and all material, tools, and equipment therein belonging to the Contractor and may use the same to complete the work at Contractor's expense. 227 GC-38 224769v1 Upon contract termination, the Contractor shall not be entitled to receive any further payment until the work is finished. If the unpaid balance of the contract price exceeds the expense of finishing the work, including compensation for additional managerial and administrative services, the excess shall be paid to the Contractor. If such expense exceeds the unpaid balance, the Contractor shall pay the difference to the Owner. The expenses incurred by the Owner as herein provided and the damages incurred through the Contractor's default shall be certified by the Engineer and Owner. 8.10 CONTRACTOR'S RIGHT TO TERMINATE CONTRACT The Contractor may terminate contract upon ten days' written notice to the Owner and the Engineer for any of the following reasons: A. If an order of any court or other public authority caused the work to be stopped or suspended for a period of 90 days through no act of fault of the Contractor or his/her employees; B. If the Owner should fail to act upon any request for payment, in the manner set forth in the General Conditions, within 45 days after its approval by the Engineer; C. If the Owner should fail to pay the Contractor any sum within 45 days after its award by arbitrators. 228 GC-39 224769v1 SECTION 9.00 - MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT 9.01 MEASUREMENT The determination of pay quantities or work performed under this contract will be made by the Engineer based upon the lines, grades, and cross sections given, or measurements made by designated Inspectors. All items will be computed based upon the units in the bid forms. 9.02 SCOPE OF PAYMENT The Contractor shall accept the compensation, as provided in the contract, in full payment for furnishing all materials, labor, tools and equipment necessary to the completed work and for performing all work contemplated and embraced under the contract; also for loss or damage arising from the nature of the work, or from the action of the elements, or from any unforeseen difficulties which may be encountered during the prosecution of the work until the final acceptance by the Owner, and for all risks of every description connected with the prosecution of the work; also for all expenses incurred in consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of the work as herein specified; and for completing the work according to the plans and specifications. Neither the payment of any estimate nor of any retained percentage shall relieve the Contractor of any obligation to make good any defective work or material. The unit contract prices for the various bid items of the contract shall be full compensation for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, tools and all things of whatsoever nature required for the complete incorporation of the item into the work the same as though the item were to read "In Place", unless the plans and Special Provisions shall provide otherwise. 9.03 PAYMENT FOR EXTRA WORK Adjustments, if any, in the amounts to be paid the Contractor by reason of any change, addition, or deduction, shall be determined by one or more of the following methods: (A) FOR ITEMS COVERED BY THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS: The Owner reserves the right to increase or decrease any of the quantities shown. In the event the actual quantities differ more than 25% of the original contract amount, an equitable revision of the unit price shall be made when requested by either the Owner or the Contractor. This 25 percent (25%) limit does not apply to items specifically excluded or listed as optional by the Owner, or to minor contract items, (items amounting to ten percent or less of the total contract). (B) FOR ITEMS NOT COVERED BY THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS: If the Engineer orders, in writing, the performance of any work not covered by the plans or included in the specifications, and for which no item in the contract is provided, and for which no unit price or lump sum basis can be agreed upon, then such extra work shall be done on a cost-plus-percentage basis of payment as follows: 229 GC-40 224769v1 1. The Contractor shall be reimbursed for all costs incurred in doing the work and shall receive an additional payment of 5% of all such cost to cover his indirect overhead costs, plus 10% of all cost, including indirect overhead as his/her fee. 2. The term "Cost" shall mean the total sum of the labor, materials and equipment costs as defined in the following. a. LABOR – The Contractor shall be compensated for the actual rate of wages paid and health and welfare benefits documented on the payroll for the actual time spent by the laborers and the foreman in performing the Force Account work. Unless already included in the wage rates paid, the Contractor shall also receive the actual labor-related costs incurred by reason of subsistence and travel allowance, pension funds, or other fringe benefits provided those payments are required through an employment contract or collective bargaining agreement applicable to the classes of labor employed in the work. b. MATERIALS – For all materials accepted by the Engineer and permanently installed in the work, the actual cost of the material (including transportation charges paid by the Contractor) will be paid. c. EQUIPMENT – Rental rates for equipment to be used in the force account work shall be established prior to use of the equipment in the work. The rental rates will be paid for the actual time the machinery and equipment are in operation on the Force Account work. 3. Each day the Contractor’s representative and the Engineer shall compare and reconcile the records of labor, materials and equipment used in the Force Account Work. 4. The Contractor shall furnish the Engineer with duplicate itemized statements of the cost for Force Account work, consisting of the following. a. Payroll for laborers and foreman. b. Quantities of materials, prices, extensions and transportation costs paid by the Contractor. Statements shall be accompanied by paid receipted invoices for materials used, including transportation charges paid by the contractor. If materials used in the Force Account work are not 230 GC-41 224769v1 specifically purchased but are taken from the Contractor’s stock, and affidavit shall be furnished certifying that the materials were taken from stock, that the quantity claimed was actually used, and that the price and transportation costs claimed are the Contractor’s actual costs. After receipt of statements and invoices, the Engineer will prepare a change order which will be submitted to the Contractor for verification and signature. 5. Monthly payments for force account work will be issued once each month for all work completed to the end of the preceding month. Claims for extra work not ordered in writing by the Engineer will not be allowed. 9.04 PROGRESS PAYMENTS, RETAINED PERCENTAGE Monthly payment will be issued once each month for all work completed to the end of the preceding month. Progress estimates shall be prepared by the Engineer as accurately as the available information will permit but the only estimate that is binding will be the final estimate. Before the final estimate is prepared, all quantities will be reviewed and rechecked. Progress payments will be made in cash or equivalent. The Owner will retain 5% of the total amount owing the Contractor until 90% or more of the contract has been completed. At that time such portions of the retained percentage will be released in an amount which the Engineer determines is not required to protect the Owner's interest in completion of the contract. The Contractor may request partial payments for the value of “Materials on hand,” defined as acceptable Materials produced for or provided to the Project, but not yet incorporated into the Work. The Owner may pay for Materials on hand in an amount not greater than the delivered cost of the Material as verified by Contractor-provided-invoices and not greater than the Contract Unit Price for the Material complete in place. The Owner may pay for materials on hand when the Contractor meets the following: 1. Requests payment for at least $5,000 2. Provides Materials specifically manufactured, produced, or supplied for permanent incorporation into the Project 3. When storage provided by the Contractor is accepted by the Engineer for Materials delivered to, or adjacent to, the Project Site and is in accordance with Section 6.04 4. When the Contractor irrevocably assigns the Materials to the Project, stores the Materials separately from other similar Materials, and ensures the Materials are not available for use on other projects, and makes the Materials available for inspection by the Owner at the Material storage location for Materials not yet delivered to, or adjacent to, the Project Site 5. Provides Materials as shown on the Plans and in accordance with the Specifications The Contractor must also provide the following actual, authentic, customary, and auditable documents, produced in the normal course of business, to receive payment for Materials on hand: 6. Paid invoices or receipts for delivery of Materials 7. An itemized list detailing the cost of Contractor-produced Material 8. Documents containing complete Material description and identification 231 GC-42 224769v1 Such materials when so paid for by the Owner shall become the property of the Owner, and in the event of the default on the part of the Contractor, the Owner may use or cause to be used such materials in construction of the work provided for in the contract. The amount paid by the Owner for materials shall reduce estimates due the Contractor as the material is used in the work. The Owner will not make partial payments for living plant or perishable Materials as Materials on hand. The Owner may withhold, in addition to retained percentages, from payment to the Contractor such an amount or amounts as may be necessary to cover: A. Defective work not remedied; B. Claims for labor or materials furnished the Contractor or subcontractor, or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing of such claims; C. Failure of the Contractor to make payments properly to subcontractors or for material or labor; D. Amounts necessary to insure that an overpayment on the total contract amount will not occur; E. Evidence of damage to another contractor or private property. 232 GC-43 224769v1 The Owner may disburse and shall have the right to act as agent for the Contractor in disbursing such funds as have been withheld pursuant to this paragraph to the party or parties who are entitled to payment therefrom but the Owner assumes no obligation to make such disbursement. The Owner will render to the Contractor a proper accounting of all such funds disbursed. 9.05 ENGINEER'S ACTION ON REQUEST FOR PAYMENT Within ten days of sub- mission of any request for payment by the Contractor, the Engineer shall: A. Approve the request for payment as submitted; or B. Approve such other amount as the Engineer shall decide is due the Contractor, informing the Contractor in writing of the reasons for approving the amended amount; or C. Withhold the request for payment, informing the Contractor in writing of the reasons for withholding it. 9.06 OWNER'S ACTION ON AN APPROVED REQUEST FOR PAYMENT Within 30 days from the date of approval of a request for payment by the Engineer, the Owner shall: A. Pay the request for payment as approved; or B. Pay such other amount as the Owner shall decide is due the Contractor, informing the Contractor and the Engineer in writing of the reasons for paying the amended amount; or C. Withhold payment informing the Contractor and the Engineer of the reasons for withholding payment. 9.07 PAYMENT FOR WORK BY THE OWNER The cost of the work performed by the Owner in removing construction equipment, tools and supplies and correcting deficiencies in accordance with the General Conditions shall be paid by the Contractor. 9.08 PAYMENT FOR UNCORRECTED WORK Should the Engineer direct the Contractor not to correct work that has been damaged or that was not performed in accordance with the contract documents, an equitable deduction from the contract amount shall be made to compensate the Owner for the uncorrected work. 9.09 PAYMENT FOR REJECTED WORK AND MATERIALS The removal of work and materials rejected and the re-execution of acceptable work by the Contractor shall be at the expense of the Contractor. The Contractor shall pay the cost of replacing the work of other contractors destroyed or damaged by the removal of the rejected work or materials and the subsequent replacement of acceptable work. 233 GC-44 224769v1 Removal of the rejected work or materials and storage of materials by the Owner in accordance with the General Conditions shall be paid by the Contractor within 30 days after written notice to pay is given by the Owner. If the Contractor does not pay the expenses of such removal and after ten day's written notice being given of the Owner’s intent to sell the materials, the Owner may sell the materials at auction or at private sale and shall pay to the Contractor the net proceeds therefrom after deducting all the costs and expenses that should have been borne by the Contractor. 9.10 PAYMENT FOR WORK SUSPENDED BY THE OWNER If the work or any part thereof shall be suspended by the Owner and abandoned by the Contractor as provided in the General Conditions, the Contractor will then be entitled to payment for all work performed on the portions so abandoned and nothing additional for the uncompleted portion of the work such as overhead, expenses, and anticipated profit. 9.11 PAYMENT FOR WORK FOLLOWING OWNER'S TERMINATION OF THE CONTRACT Upon termination of the contract by the Owner no further payments shall be due the Contractor until the work is completed. If the unpaid balance of the contract amount shall exceed the cost of completing the work including all overhead costs, the excess shall exceed the unpaid balance, the Contractor shall pay the difference to the Owner. The cost incurred by the Owner as herein provided, and the damage incurred through the Contractor's default, shall be certified by the Owner and approved by the Engineer. 9.12 PAYMENT FOR WORK TERMINATED BY THE CONTRACTOR Upon termination of the contract by the Contractor, the Contractor shall recover payment from the Owner for work performed. 9.13 RELEASE OF LIENS Before final payment is made to the Contractor for the work, the Contractor shall deliver to the Owner a complete release of all liens arising out of this contract or in receipt in full in lieu thereof and in either case, an affidavit that the releases and receipt include all the labor and material for which a lien could be filed; but the Contractor may, if any subcontractor refuses to furnish a release, a lien or receipt in full, furnish a bond satisfactory to the Owner which will indemnify the Owner against any lien. If any lien remains unsatisfied after all payments are made to the Contractor, the Contractor shall refund to the Owner all money that the latter may be compelled to pay in discharging such a lien, including all costs and a reasonable attorney's fee. 9.14 ACCEPTANCE AND FINAL PAYMENT When the Contractor shall have completed the work in accordance with the terms of the contract documents, the Engineer shall certify acceptance to the Owner and approval of the Contractor’s final request for payment, which shall be the contract amount minus previous payments made. The Contractor shall furnish a two-year maintenance bond and a notarized certificate that all debts for 234 GC-45 224769v1 labor, materials, and equipment incurred in connection with the work, have been fully paid, following which the Owner shall accept the work and release the Contractor except as to the conditions of the Maintenance Bond and legal rights of the Owner, requiring guaranties, and correction of faulty work after final payment, and shall authorize payment of the Contractor's final request for payment. The Contractor must allow sufficient time between time of completion of the work and approval of the final request for payment for the Engineer to assemble and check the necessary data. The approval of a request for a final progress payment by the Engineer and the making of a final or progress payment to the Contractor does not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for faulty material or workmanship and the Owner by such payment does not waive any claims of overpayment resulting from mathematical error, unauthorized work, or from any other cause. Final payment will not be made until the Contractor furnishes a certificate showing compliance with State Statutes requiring withholding of State Income Taxes. 9.15 TERMINATION OF CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY The contract will be considered complete when all work has been finished, the final inspection made by the Engineer, and the project accepted in writing by the Owner. The Contractor's responsibility shall then cease, except as set forth in the maintenance bond, as required by the guaranty period. 9.16 CORRECTION OF FAULTY WORK AFTER FINAL PAYMENT The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship and materials which may develop in any part of the entire installation furnished by the Contractor. Upon written notice by the Engineer the Contractor shall immediately replace and make good without expense to the Owner any such faulty part of the parts and damage done by reason of same, during the guarantee period of two years, or as specified, from the date of final payment approval or the installation of all work. Should the Contractor fail to make good the defective parts within a period of 30 days of such notification, after written notice has been given, the Owner may replace these parts, charging the expense of same to the Contractor. 9.17 FAILURE TO PAY FOR LABOR AND MATERIALS Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.425, Subd. 4a, the contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the contractor's receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The contractor must pay interest of 1½ percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. If, at any time, the Contractor fails to pay the subcontractor or the laborers employed upon the work, or fails to pay for the material used herein, the Owner may withhold from the money which may be due the Contractor under this agreement such amount or amounts as may be necessary for the 235 GC-46 224769v1 payment of the subcontractors, laborers, or materials, and may, acting as agent for the Contractor, apply the same to such payments and deduct the same from the final estimate of the Contractor. 236 GC-47 224769v1 9.18 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: 237 GC-48 224769v1 INFORMATION FOR BIDDERS 1. COPIES OF BIDDING DOCUMENTS. 1.1 Complete sets of the Bidding Documents in the number and for the deposit sum stated in the Advertisement for Bids may be obtained from . 1.2 Complete sets of Bidding Documents shall be used in preparing Bids; neither Owner nor Engineer assumes any responsibility for errors or misinterpretations resulting from the use of incomplete sets of Bidding Documents. 1.3 Owner and Engineer in making copies of Bidding Documents available on the above terms do so only for the purpose of obtaining Bids on the work and do not confer a license or grant for any other use. 2. QUALIFICATIONS OF BIDDERS. To demonstrate qualifications to perform the work, each Bidder must be prepared to submit within five days of Owner’s request written evidence of financial data, and previous experience. Each Bid must contain evidence of Bidder’s qualification to do business in the State where the Project is located, or covenant to obtain such qualification prior to award of the Contract. 3. EXAMINATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SITE. 3.1 Before submitting a Bid, each Bidder must (a) examine the Contract Documents thoroughly, (b) visit the site to familiarize himself/herself with local conditions that may in any manner affect cost, progress or performance of the work, (c) familiarize himself/herself with Federal, State, and Local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations that may in any manner affect cost, progress or performance of the work, and (d) study and carefully correlate Bidder’s observations with the Contract Documents. 3.2 Reference is made to the Special Provisions for the identification of those reports of investigations and tests of subsurface and latent physical conditions at the site or otherwise affecting cost, progress or performance of the work which have been relied upon by Engineer in preparing the Drawings and Specifications. Copies of such reports are bound with the Specifications. These reports are not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness, nor are they a part of the Contract Documents. Before submitting his/her Bid, each Bidder will, at his/her own expense, make such additional investigations and tests as the Bidder may deem necessary to determine his/her Bid for performance of the work in accordance with the time, price, and other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. 3.3 On request, Owner will provide each Bidder access to the site to conduct such investigations and tests as each Bidder deems necessary for submission of his/her Bid. 3.4 The submission of a Bid will constitute an incontrovertible representation by the Bidder that he/she has complied with every requirement of this Article 3 and that the Contract Documents are sufficient in scope and detail to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance of the work. 4. INTERPRETATIONS. All questions about the meaning or intent of the Contract Documents shall be submitted to Engineer in writing. Replies will be issued by Addenda mailed or delivered to all parties recorded by Engineer as having received the Bidding Documents. Questions received less than four days prior to the date for opening of Bids will not be answered. Only questions answered by formal written Addenda will be binding. Oral and other interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect. 238 GC-49 224769v1 5. BID SECURITY. 5.1 Bid security shall be made payable to the Owner, in an amount as stated in the Advertisement for Bids of the Bidder’s maximum Bid price, and in the form of a certified or bank check or a Bid Bond, issued by a Surety, meeting the requirements of paragraph 2.06 of the General Conditions. 5.2 The Bid Security of the three lowest Bidders will be retained until the successful Bidder has executed the Agreement and furnished the required Contract Security, whereupon it will be returned; if the successful Bidder fails to execute and deliver the Agreement and furnish the required Contract Security within 15 days of the Notice of Award. Owner may annul the Notice of Award and the Bid Security of that Bidder will be forfeited. The Bid Security of any Bidder whom Owner believes to have a reasonable chance of receiving the award (generally the second and third low Bidder) may be retained by the Owner until the earlier of the seventh day after the “effective date of the Agreement” (which term is defined in the General Conditions) by Owner to Contractor and the required Contract Security is furnished or the sixty-first day after the Bid opening. Bid security of other Bidders will be returned within seven days of the Bid opening. 6. CONTRACT TIME. The number of days within which, or the date by which, the work is to be completed (the Contract time) is set forth in the Bid Form and will be included in the Special Provisions. 7. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. Provisions for liquidated damages are set forth in the General Conditions, Paragraph 8.08. 8. SUBCONTRACTORS, ETC. 8.1 If the Bid Proposal or Supplementary Conditions require the identity of certain subcontractors and other persons and organizations to be submitted to Owner in advance of the Notice of Award, the apparent Successful Bidder, and any other Bidder so requests, will within seven days after the day of the Bid Opening submit to Owner a list of all subcontractors and other persons and organizations (including those who are to furnish the principal items of material and equipment) proposed for those portions of the work as to which such identification is so required. Such list shall be accompanied by an experience statement with pertinent information as to similar projects and other evidence of qualification of each such subcontractor, person and organization if requested by Owner. If Owner or Engineer after due investigation has reasonable objection to any proposed subcontractor, other person or organization, either may before giving the Notice of Award request the apparent Successful Bidder to submit an acceptable substitute without an increase in Bid price. If the apparent successful Bidder declines to make any such substitution, the Contract shall not be awarded to such Bidder, but his/her declining to make any such substitution will not constitute grounds for sacrificing his/her Bid Security. Any subcontractor, other person or organization so listed and to whom Owner or Engineer does not make written objection prior to the giving of the Notice of Award will be deemed acceptable to Owner and Engineer. 8.2 In contracts where the Contract Price is on the basis of Cost-of-the-Work Plus a Fee, the apparent Successful Bidder, prior to the Notice of Award shall identify in writing to Owner those portions of the work that such Bidder proposes to subcontract and after the Notice of Award may only subcontract other portions of the work with Owner’s written consent. 8.3 No Contractor shall be required to employ any subcontractor, other person or organization against whom he/she has reasonable objection. 9. BID FORM. 9.1 One Bid Form is attached hereto and is provided to each Bidder requesting Bid Documents. Additional copies may be obtained from the Engineer. 239 GC-50 224769v1 9.2 Bid Forms must be completed in ink or by typewriter. The Bid Price of each item on the form must be stated in words and numerals; in case of a conflict, words will take precedence. 9.3 Bids by corporations must be executed in the corporate name by the president or a vice- president (or other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign) and the corporate seal must be affixed and attested by the secretary or an assistant secretary. The corporate address and state of incorporation shall be shown below the signature. 9.4 Bids by partnerships must be executed in the partnership name and be signed by a partner, whose title must appear under the signature and the official address of the partnership must be shown below the signature. 9.5 All names must be typed or printed below the signature. 9.6 The Bid shall contain an acknowledgement of receipt of all Addenda (the number of which shall be filled in on the Bid Form). 9.7 The address to which communications regarding the Bid are to be directed must be shown. 10. SUBMISSION OF BIDS. Bids shall be submitted at the time and place indicated in the Invitation to Bid or Advertisement for Bids and shall be included in an opaque sealed envelope, marked with the Project title and name and address of the Bidder and accompanied by the Bid Security and other required documents. If the Bid is sent through the mail or other delivery system, the sealed envelope shall be enclosed in a separate envelope with the notation “BID ENCLOSED” on the face thereof. Bids arriving at the designated place after the designated time will be returned to the Bidder unopened. 11. MODIFICATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF BIDS. 11.1 Bids may be modified or withdrawn by an appropriate document duly executed (in the manner that a Bid must be executed) and delivered to the place where Bids are to be submitted at any time prior to the opening of Bids. 11.2 If, within twenty-four (24) hours after Bids are opened, any Bidder files a duly signed written notice with Owner and promptly thereafter demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of Owner that there was a material and substantial mistake in the preparation of his/her Bid, that Bidder may withdraw his/her Bid and the Bid Security will be returned. Thereafter, that Bidder will be disqualified from further bidding on the work. 12. OPENING OF BIDS. When Bids are opened publicly, they will be read aloud and an abstract of the amounts of the base Bids and major alternates (if any) will be made available after the opening of Bids 13. BIDS TO REMAIN OPEN. All Bids shall remain open for sixty days after the day of the Bid opening, but Owner may, in his/her sole discretion, release any Bid and return the Bid Security prior to that date. 14. AWARD OF CONTRACT. 14.1 Owner reserves the right to reject any and all Bids, to waive any and all informalities and to negotiate Contract terms with the Successful Bidder, and the right to disregard all nonconforming, non-responsive or conditional Bids. The quantities shown on the Bid Form are estimated and are furnished only as a basis to prepare a Bid and to determine the lowest Bidder. The Bid Price shall be determined by multiplying the unit price bid per item times the estimated quantity per item. The sum total of all Bid Prices shall be the Contract Price and the basis for determining the lowest Bid. Discrepancies between words and figures in a unit price bid will be resolved to harmonize with the Bid Price. If neither the words nor figures in the unit price harmonize with the Bid Price, the words will be used as the unit price bid. 14.2 In evaluating Bids, Owner shall consider the qualifications of the Bidders, whether or not the Bids comply with the prescribed requirements, and alternates and unit prices if requested in 240 GC-51 224769v1 the Bid Forms. It is Owner’s intent to accept alternates (if any are accepted) in the order in which they are listed in the Bid form but Owner may accept them in any order or combination. 14.3 Owner may consider the qualifications and experience of subcontractors and other persons and organizations (including those who are to furnish the principal items of material or equipment) proposed for those portions of the work as to which the identity of subcontractors and other persons and organizations must be submitted as provided in the Supplementary Conditions. Operating costs, maintenance considerations, performance data and guarantee of materials and equipment may also be considered by Owner. 14.4 Owner may conduct such investigations as he/she deems necessary to assist in the evaluation of any Bid and to establish the responsibility, qualifications and financial ability of the Bidders, proposed subcontractors and other persons and organizations to do the work in accordance with the Contract Documents to Owner’s satisfaction within the prescribed time. 14.5 Owner reserves the right to reject the Bid of any Bidder who does not pass any such evaluation to Owner’s satisfaction. 14.6 If the Contract is to be awarded, it will be awarded to the lowest Bidder whose evaluation by Owner indicates to Owner that the award will be in the best interests of the Project. 14.7 If the Contract is to be awarded, Owner will give the Successful Bidder a Notice of Award within sixty days after the date of the Bid opening or other specified date. 15. PERFORMANCE AND OTHER BONDS. Paragraph 3.04 of the General Conditions set forth Owner’s requirements as to performance and other Bonds. When the Successful Bidder delivers the executed Agreement to Owner, it shall be accompanied by the required Contract Security. 16. SIGNING OF AGREEMENT. When Owner gives a Notice of Award to the Successful Bidder, it will be accompanied by at least three unsigned counterparts of the Agreement and all other Contract Documents. Within fifteen days thereafter, Contractor shall sign and deliver at least three counterparts of the Agreement to Owner with all other Contract Documents attached. Within ten days thereafter, Owner will deliver all fully signed counterparts to Contractor. Engineer will identify those portions of the Contract Documents not fully signed by Owner and Contractor and such identification shall be binding on all parties. 17. SPECIAL LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. Special Legal Requirements, if any, will be included in the Special Provisions. END OF DOCUMENT 241 GC-52 224769v1 FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND CONTRACTOR THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Owner”) and (“Contractor”). Owner and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents”, all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement; B. Specifications dated ; C. City of Chanhassen General Conditions of the Construction Contract; D. Quote/Bid dated . In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “D” having the last priority. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. CONTRACT PRICE. Owner shall pay Contractor for completion of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents . 4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES. A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment. Applications for Payment will be processed by Engineer as provided in the General Conditions. B. Progress Payments; Retainage. Owner shall make 95% progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment during performance of the Work. C. Payments to Subcontractor. (1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.425, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1½ percent per month or any 242 GC-52 224769v1 part of a month to the Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. (2) Form IC-134 (attached) required from general contractor. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Chanhassen obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of Revenue for approval. The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid. D. Final Payment. Upon final completion of the Work, Owner shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by Engineer. 5. COMPLETION DATE/LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. A. The Work must be completed within ( ) days after the date the Contract Times commence to run, and completed and ready for final payment in accordance with the General Conditions within ( ) days after the date when the Contract Times commence to run. B. Contractor and Owner recognize that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that Owner will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in Paragraph 5.A. above, plus any extensions thereof allowed. The parties also recognize the delays, expense, and difficulties involved in proving in a legal or arbitration proceeding the actual loss suffered by Owner if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, Owner and Contractor agree that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), Contractor shall pay Owner $ for each calendar day that expires after the time specified in Paragraph 5.A. for Completion until the Work is complete. Daily costs are based on MnDOT Table 1807-1, "Schedule of Liquidated Damages as follows: 243 GC-53 224769v1 TABLE 1807-1 SCHEDULE OF LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Original Contract Amount Charge Per Cal. Day ($) From More Than ($) To and Including ($) 0 25,000 300 25,000 100,000 400 100,000 500,000 900 500,000 1,000,000 1,200 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,500 2,000,000 5,000,000 2,500 5,000,000 10,000,000 3,000 10,000,000 ---- 3,500 6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the General Conditions and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the site. E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding Documents, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in 244 GC-54 224769v1 accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by Owner and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. Contractor has given Engineer written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by Engineer is acceptable to Contractor. J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. K. Subcontracts: (1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, upon receipt of the executed Contract Documents, submit in writing to the Owner the names of the Subcontractors proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request or with the consent of the Owner. (2) The Contractor is responsible to the Owner for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's subcontractors, and of their direct and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's employees. (3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between the Owner, the Engineer, and any Subcontractor. (4) The Contractor shall bind every Subcontractor by the terms of the Contract Documents. 7. WORKER’S COMPENSATION. The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY. Contractor shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage and maintain it at all times throughout the life of the 245 GC-55 224769v1 Contract, with the City included as an additional name insured on a primary and non- contributory basis. The Contractor shall furnish the City a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the required coverage: Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Contractual Liability (identifying the contract): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Personal Injury, with Employment Exclusion deleted: $2,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non-owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence 9. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the quote shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications. 10. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a result of any such claims. 11. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General Conditions. B. Owner and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, 246 GC-56 224769v1 assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon Owner and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provisions. D. Data Practices/Records. (1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. (2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices to the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. E. Software License. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Contract contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. F. Patented devices, materials and processes. If the Contract requires, or the Contractor desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Contractor shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the Owner. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the Project agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the Owner for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement G. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other 247 GC-57 224769v1 party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. H. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. I. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Contract. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County. J. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Contract is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Contract, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Contract impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties’ entire contract. K. Entire Agreement. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. L. Permits and Licenses; Rights-of-Way and Easements. The Contractor shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees therefore, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the construction and completion of the Project. The City will obtain all necessary rights-of-way and easements. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for any construction delay resulting from the City’s not timely obtaining rights-of- way or easements. M. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the action or inaction of the Owner, the Contractor shall be allowed a time extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other compensation. 248 GC-58 224769v1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CONTRACTOR: BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor BY: BY: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Its END OF DOCUMENT 249 GC-59 224769v1 PERFORMANCE BOND Any singular reference to Contractor, Surety, Owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable. SURETY (Name and Address of Principal Place of Business): OWNER (Name and Address) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Date: Amount: Description (Name and Location): BOND Date (Not earlier than Construction Contract Date): Amount: Modification to this Bond Form: None. CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY (Seal) (Seal) Bidder's Name and Corporate Seal Surety's Name and Corporate Seal By: Signature and Title By: Signature and Title CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY (Seal) (Seal) Bidder's Name and Corporate Seal Surety's Name and Corporate Seal By: Signature and Title By: Signature and Title CONTRACTOR (Name and Address): 250 GC-60 224769v1 1. The Contractor and the Surety, jointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the Owner for the performance of the Construction Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference. 2. If the Contractor performs the Construction Contract, the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond, except to participate in conferences as provided in Subparagraph 3.1. 3. If there is no Owner Default, the Surety's obligation under this Bond shall arise after: 3.1. The Owner has notified the Contractor and the Surety at its address described in Paragraph 10 below, that the Owner is considering declaring a Contractor Default and has requested and attempted to arrange a conference with the Contractor and the Surety to be held not later than fifteen days after receipts of such notice to discuss methods of performing the Construction Contract. If the Owner, the Contractor and the Surety agree, the Contractor shall be allowed a reasonable time to perform the Construction Contract, but such an agreement shall not waive the Owner's right, if any, subsequently to declare a Contractor Default; and 3.2. The Owner has declared a Contractor Default and formally terminated the Contractor's right to complete the contract. Such Contractor Default shall not be declared earlier than twenty days after the Contractor and the Surety have received notice as provided in Subparagraph 3.1; and 3.3. The Owner has agreed to pay the Balance of the Contract Price to the Surety in accordance with the terms of the Construction Contract or to a contractor selected to perform the Construction Contract in accordance with the terms of the contract with the Owner. 4. When the Owner has satisfied the conditions of Paragraph 3, the Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's expense take one of the following actions: 4.1. Arrange for the Contractor, with consent of the Owner, to perform and complete the Construction Contract; or 4.2. Undertake to perform and complete the Construction Contract itself; through its agents or through independent contractors; or 4.3. Obtain bids or negotiated proposals from qualified contractors acceptable to the Owner for a contract for performance and completion of the Construction Contract, arrange for a contract to be prepared for execution by the Owner and the contractor selected with the Owner's concurrence, to be secured with performance and payment bonds executed by a qualified surety equivalent to the bonds issued on the Construction Contract, and pay to the Owner the amount of damages as described in Paragraph 6 in excess of the Balance of the Contract Price incurred by the resulting from the Contractor's default; or 4.4. Waive its right to perform and complete, arrange for completion, or obtain a new contractor and with reasonable promptness under the circumstances: 1. After investigation, determine the amount for which it may be liable to the Owner and, as soon as practicable after the amount is determined, tender payment therefore to the Owner; or 2. Deny liability in whole or in part and notify the Owner citing reasons therefore. 5. If the Surety does not proceed as provided in Paragraph 4 with reasonable promptness, the Surety shall be deemed to be in default on this Bond fifteen days after receipt of an additional written notice from the Owner to the Surety demanding that the Surety perform its obligations under this Bond, and the Owner shall be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner. If the Surety proceeds as provided in Subparagraph 4.4, and the Owner refuses the payment tendered or the Surety has denied liability, in whole or in part, without further notice the Owner shall be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner. 6. After the Owner has terminated the Contractor's right to complete the Construction Contract, and if the Surety elected to act under Subparagraph 4.1, 4.2, or 4.3 above, then the responsibilities of the Surety to the Owner shall not be greater than those of the Contractor under the Construction Contract, and the responsibilities of the Owner to the Surety shall not be greater than those of the Owner under the Construction Contract.. To the limit of the amount of this Bond, but subject to commitment by the Owner of the Balance of the Contract Price to mitigation of costs and damages on the Construction Contract, the Surety is obligated without duplication for: 6.1. The responsibilities of the Contractor for correction of defective work and completion of the Construction Contract: 6.2. Additional legal, design professional and delay costs resulting from the Contractor's Default, and resulting from the actions or failure to act of the Surety under Paragraph 4; and 6.3. Liquidated damages, or if no liquidated damages are specified in the Construction Contract, actual damages caused by delayed performance or non-performance of the Contractor. 7. The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner or others for obligations of the Contractor that are unrelated to the Construction Contract, and the Balance of the Contract Price shall not be reduced or set off on account of any such unrelated obligations. No right of action shall accrue on this Bond to any person or entity other than the Owner or its heirs, executors, administrators, or successors. 8. The Surety hereby waives notice of any change, including changes of time, to the Construction Contract or to related subcontractors, purchase orders and other obligations. 9. Any proceeding, legal or equitable, under this Bond may be instituted in any court of competent jurisdiction in the location in which the work or part of the work is located and shall be instituted within two years after Contractor Default or within two years after the Surety refuses or fails to perform its obligations under this Bond, whichever occurs first. If the provisions of 251 GC-61 224769v1 this Paragraph are void or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to sureties as a defense in the jurisdiction of the suit shall be applicable. 10. Notice to the Surety, the Owner or the Contractor shall be mailed or delivered to the address shown on the signature page. 11. When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement in the location where the construction was to be performed, any provision in this Bond conflicting with said statutory or legal requirement shall be deemed incorporated herein. The intent is that this Bond shall be construed as a statutory bond and not as a common law bond. 12. DEFINITIONS 12.1. Balance of the Contract Price: The total amount payable by the Owner to the Contractor under the Construction Contract after all proper adjustments have been made, including allowance to the Contractor of any amounts received or to be received by the Owner in settlement of insurance or other claims for damages to which the Contractor is entitled, reduced by all valid and proper payments made to or on behalf of the Contractor under the Construction Contract. 12.2. Construction Contract: The agreement between the Owner and the Contractor identified on the signature page, including all Contract Documents and changes thereto. 12.3. Contractor Default: Failure of the Contractor, which has neither been remedied nor waived, to perform or otherwise to comply with the terms of the Construction Contract. 12.4. Owner Default: Failure of the Owner, which has neither been remedied nor waived, to pay the Contractor as required by the Construction Contract or to perform and complete or comply with the other terms thereof. 252 GC-62 224769v1 PAYMENT BOND Any singular reference to Contractor, Surety, Owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable. CONTRACTOR (Name and Address): SURETY (Name and Address of Principal Place Of Business): OWNER (Name and Address): CONTRACT Date: Amount: Description (Name and Location): BOND Date (Not earlier than Contract Date): Amount: Modifications to this Bond Form: Surety and Contractor, intending to be legally bound hereby, subject to the terms printed on the reverse side hereof, do each cause this Performance Bond to be duly executed on its behalf by its authorized officer, agent or representative. CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY Company: (Corp. Seal) Company: (Corp. Seal) Signature: Signature: Name and Title: Name and Title: (Attach Power of Attorney) (Space is provided below for signatures of additional parties, if required.) CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY Company: (Corp. Seal) Company: (Corp. Seal) Signature: Signature: Name and Title: Name and Title: EJCDE No. 1910-28-A (1996 Edition) Originally prepared through the joint efforts of the Surety Association of America, Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee, the Associated General Contractors of America, and the American Institute of Architects. 253 GC-63 224769v1 1. The CONTRACTOR and the Surety, jointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrator, successors and assigns to the OWNER to pay for labor, materials and equipment furnished for use in the performance of the Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference. 2. With respect to the OWNER, this obligation shall be null and void if the CONTRACTOR: 2.1 Promptly makes payment, directly or indirectly, for all sums due Claimants, and 2.2 Defends, indemnifies and holds harmless the OWNER from all claims, demands, liens or suits by any person or entity who furnished labor, materials or equipment for use in the performance of the Contract, provided the OWNER has promptly notified the CONTRACTOR and the Surety (at the addresses described in paragraph 12) of any claims, demands, liens or suits and tendered defense of such claims, demands, liens or suits to the CONTRACTOR and the Surety, and provided there is no OWNER Default. 3. With respect to Claimants, this obligation shall be null and void if the CONTRACTOR promptly makes payment, directly or indirectly, for all sums due. 4. The Surety shall have no obligation to Claimants under this bond until: 4.1 Claimants who are employed by or have a direct contract with the CONTRACTOR have given notice to the Surety (at the addresses described in paragraph 12) and sent a copy, of notice thereof, to the OWNER, stating that a claim is being made under this Bond and, with substantial accuracy, the amount of the claim. 4.2 Claimants who do not have a direct contract with the CONTRACTOR: 1. Have furnished written notice to the CONTRACTOR and sent a copy, or notice thereof, to the OWNER, within 90 days after having last performed labor or last furnished materials or equipment included in the claim stating, with substantial accuracy, the amount of the claim and the name of the party to who the materials are furnished or supplied or for whom the labor was done or formed; and 2. Have either received a rejection in whole or in part from the CONTRACTOR, or not received within 30 days of furnishing the above notice any communication from the CONTRACTOR by which the CONTRACTOR had indicated the claim will be paid directly or indirectly; and 3. Not having been paid within the above 30 days, have sent a written notice to the Surety and sent a copy, or notice thereof, to the OWNER, stating that a claim is being made under this Bond and enclosing a copy of the previous written notice furnished to the CONTRACTOR. 5. If a notice required by paragraph 4 is given by the OWNER to the CONTRACTOR or to the Surety, that is sufficient compliance. 6. When the Claimant has satisfied the conditions of paragraph 4, the Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's expense take the following actions: 6.1 Send an answer to the Claimant, with a copy to the OWNER, within 45 days after receipt of the claim, stating the amounts that are undisputed and the basis for challenging any amounts that are disputed. 6.2 Pay or arrange for payment of any undisputed amounts. 7. The Surety's total obligation shall not exceed the amount of this Bond, and the amount of this Bond shall be credited for any payments made in good faith by the Surety. 8. Amounts owed by the OWNER to the CONTRACTOR under the Contract shall be used for the performance of the Contract and to satisfy claims, if any, under any Performance Bond. By the CONTRACTOR furnishing and the OWNER accepting this Bond, they agree that all funds earned by the CONTRACTOR in the performance of the Contract are dedicated to satisfy obligations of the CONTRACTOR and the Surety under this Bond, subject to the OWNER's priority to use the funds for the completion of the Work. (FOR INFORMATION ONLY—Name, Address, and Telephone) AGENT or BROKER: OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE (ENGINEER or other party) 9. The Surety shall not be liable to the OWNER, Claimants or others for obligations of the CONTRACTOR that are unrelated to the Contract. The OWNER shall not be liable for payment of any costs or expenses of any Claimant under this Bond, and shall have under this Bond no obligations to make payments to, give notices on behalf of, or otherwise have obligations to Claimants under this Bond. 10. The Surety hereby waives notice of any change, including changes of time, to the Contract or to related Subcontracts, purchase orders and other obligations. 11. No suit or action shall be commenced by the Claimant under this Bond other than in a court of competent jurisdiction in the location in which the Work or part of the Work is located or after the expiration of one year from the date (1) on which the Claimant gave the notice required by paragraph 4.1 or paragraph 4.2.3, or (2) on which the last labor or service was performed by anyone or the last materials or equipment were furnished by anyone under the Construction Contract, whichever of (1) or (2) first occurs. If the provisions of this paragraph are void or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to sureties as a defense in the jurisdiction of the suit shall be applicable. 12. Notice to the Surety, the OWNER or the CONTRACTOR shall be mailed or delivered to the addresses shown on the signature page. Actual receipt of notice by Surety, the OWNER or the CONTRACTOR, however accomplished, shall be sufficient compliance as of the date received at the address shown on the signature page. 13. When this bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement in the location where the Contract was to be performed, any provision in this Bond conflicting with said statutory or legal requirement shall be deemed deleted here from and provisions confirming to such statutory or other legal requirement shall be deemed incorporated herein. The intent is, that this Bond shall be construed as a statutory Bond and not as a common law bond. 14. Upon request of any person or entity appearing to be a potential beneficiary of this Bond, the CONTRACTOR shall promptly furnish a copy of this Bond or shall permit a copy to be made. 15. DEFINITIONS 15.1 Claimant: An individual or entity having a direct contract with the CONTRACTOR or with a Subcontractor of the CONTRACTOR to furnish labor, materials or equipment for use in the performance of the Contract. The intent of this Bond shall be to include within limitation in the terms "labor, materials or equipment" that part of water, gas, power, light, heat, oil, gasoline, telephone service or rental equipment used in the Contract, architectural and engineering services required for performance of the Work of the CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTOR's Subcontractors, and all other items for which a mechanic's lien may be asserted in the jurisdiction where the labor, materials or equipment were furnished. 15.2 Contract: The agreement between the OWNER and the CONTRACTOR identified on the signature page, including all Contract Documents and changes thereto. 15.3 OWNER Default: Failure of the OWNER, which has neither been remedied nor waived, to pay the CONTRACTOR as required by the Contractor or to perform and complete or comply with the other terms thereof. 254 GC-64 224769v1 FORM OF NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH BID PROPOSAL) Affidavit of Non-Collusion: I hereby swear (or affirm) under the penalty for perjury: 1. That I am the bidder (if the bidder is an individual), a partner in the bidder partnership (if the bidder is a partnership), or an officer or employee of the bidding corporation having authority to sign on its behalf (if the bidder is a corporation). 2. That the attached bid or bids have been arrived at by the bidder independently, and have been submitted without collusion with, and without, any other vendor of materials, supplies, equipment, or other services described in the invitation to bid, designed to limit independent bidding or competition. 3. That the contents of the bid or bids have not been communicated by the bidder or its employees or agents to any person not an employee or agent of the bidder or its surety on any bond furnished with the bid or bids, and will not be communicated to any such person prior to the official opening of the bids or bids; and 4. That I have fully informed myself regarding the accuracy of the statements made in this affidavit. Signed Firm Name Address 255 GC-65 224769v1 CAMPBELL KNUTSON New Law Regarding Contractor Requirements Effective January 1, 2015 The Minnesota Legislature recently enacted a new law related to accountability and transparency in public construction contracts. These "responsible contractor" requirements, which take effect January 1, 2015, apply to publicly owned or financed projects estimated to exceed $50,000 that are awarded pursuant to a lowest responsible bidder or best value selection method. Under the statute, a project means "building, erection, construction, alteration, remodeling, demolition, or repair of buildings, real property, highways, roads, bridges, or other construction work performed pursuant to a construction contract." The law applies to construction managers as well as contractors, and requires both that the contractor meet the minimum criteria specified in the new law and verifies its compliance as part of its response to the contracting government entity. In its response to the contract solicitation, the contractor has to verify that it: 1) is in compliance with workers' compensation and unemployment insurance requirements; 2) is currently registered with the Department of Revenue and the Department of Employment and Economic Development if it has employees; 3) has a valid federal tax identification number or a valid Social Security number if an individual; and 4) has filed a certificate of authority to transact business in Minnesota with the secretary of state if a foreign corporation or cooperative. Further, the contractor must verify that: 1) the contractor or related entity is in compliance with and, during the three-year period before submitting the verification, has not violated certain specified state and federal labor laws; 2) the contractor or related entity is in compliance with and, during the three-year period before submitting the verification, has not violated state independent contractor laws (§181.723) or state construction codes (Chapter 326B); 256 GC-66 224769v1 Page 2 3) the contractor or related entity has not, more than twice during the three- year period before submitting the verification, had a certificate of compliance under state affirmative action/MEE provisions (§ 363A.36) revoked or suspended; 4) the contractor or related entity has not received a final determination assessing a monetary sanction from the Department of Administration or Transportation for failure to meet targeted group business, disadvantaged business enterprise, or veteran-owned business goals, due to a lack of good faith effort, more than once during the three-year period before submitting the verification; 5) the contractor or related entity is not currently suspended or debarred by the federal government or the state of Minnesota or any of its departments, commissions, agencies, or political subdivisions; and 6) all subcontractors that the contractor intends to use to perform project work have verified to the contractor through a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer that they meet the minimum criteria listed in clauses (1) to (6). See: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/?year=20l4&type=O&doctype=Chapter&id=253 In order to comply with the new statutory requirements, all city-issued solicitation documents on qualifying projects should include the following language: 1) Any prime contractor or subcontractor that does not meet the minimum criteria established for a "responsible contractor" as defined in Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3, or fails to verify that it meets those criteria is not a responsible contractor and is not eligible to be awarded a construction contract for the Project or to perfom1work on the Project. 2) Responding contractors shall submit to the City a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer verifying compliance with each of the minimum criteria in Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3, at the time that it responds to this solicitation document. 3) A prime contractor shall submit to the City, upon request, copies of the signed verifications of compliance from all subcontractors. 4) A false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria shall make the prime contractor or subcontractor that makes the false statement ineligible to be awarded a construction project and may result in termination of a contract awarded to a prime contractor or subcontractor that submits a false statement. 179556 257 GC-67 224769v1 Page 3 In addition, the Contract between the City and the Contractor should contain the following language: 1) This contract may be terminated by the City at any time upon discovery by the City that the prime contractor or subcontractor has submitted a false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria set forth in Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3. Finally, a sample verification form follows: 258 GC-68 224769v1 CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE The undersigned, being first duly sworn, as a responding contractor on the Project, represents and swears as follows: Now, and at all times during the duration of the Project, the undersigned complies with each of the minimum criteria in Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3, the Responsible Contractor statute. The undersigned understands that a failure to meet or verify compliance with the minimum criteria established for a "responsible contractor" as defined in Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3, renders a bidder ineligible to be awarded a construction contract for the Project or to perform work on the Project. Upon request, the undersigned will submit copies of the signed verifications of compliance from all subcontractors. The undersigned understands that a false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria shall make the undersigned, or its subcontractor that makes the false statement, ineligible to be awarded a construction project and may result in termination of a contract awarded to the undersigned or its subcontractor that submits a false statement. CONTRACTOR: 259 GC-69 224769v1 RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.285, subdivision 3. Responsible Contractor, Minimum Criteria. “Responsible Contractor” means a contractor that conforms to the responsibility requirements in the solicitation document for its portion of the work on the project and verifies that it meets the minimum criteria set forth below. Each contractor or subcontractor shall obtain from all subcontractors with which it will have a direct contractual relationship a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer verifying that they meet all of the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 prior to execution of a construction contract with each subcontractor. 1. The Contractor: i. is in compliance with workers' compensation and unemployment insurance requirements; ii. is in compliance with the Department of Revenue and the Department of Employment and Economic Development registration requirements if it has employees; iii. has a valid federal tax identification number or a valid Social Security number if an individual; and iv. has filed a certificate of authority to transact business in Minnesota with the secretary of state if a foreign corporation or cooperative. 2. The contractor or related entity is in compliance with and, during the three-year period before submitting verification, has not violated section 177.24, 177.25, 177.41 to 177.44, 181.13, 181.14, or 181.722, and has not violated United States Code, title 29, sections 201 to 219, or United States Code, title 40, section 3141 to 3148. For purposes of this clause, a violation occurs when a contractor or related entity: i. repeatedly fails to pay statutorily required wages or penalties on one or more separate projects for a total underpayment of $25,000 or more within the three-year period, provided that a failure to pay is “repeated” only if it involves two or more separate and distinct occurrences of underpayment during the three-year period; ii. has been issued an order to comply by the commissioner of labor and industry that has become final; iii. has been issued at least two determination letters within the three-year period by the Department of Transportation finding an underpayment by the contractor or related entity to its own employees; iv. has been found by the commissioner of labor and industry to have repeatedly or willfully violated any of the sections referenced in this clause pursuant to section 177.27; v. has been issued a ruling or findings of underpayment by the administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor that have become final or have been upheld by an administrative law judge or the Administrative Review Board; or vi. has been found liable for underpayment of wages or penalties or misrepresenting a construction worker as an independent contractor in an action brought in a court having jurisdiction. Provided that, if the contractor or related entity contests a determination of underpayment by the Department of Transportation in a contested case proceeding, a 260 GC-69 224769v1 violation does not occur until the contested case proceeding has concluded with a determination that the contractor or related entity underpaid wages or penalties;* 3. The contractor or related entity is in compliance with and, during the three-year period before submitting the verification, has not violated section 181.723 or chapter 326B. For purposes of this clause, a violation occurs when a contractor or related entity has been issued a final administrative or licensing order;* 4. The contractor or related entity has not, more than twice during the three-year period before submitting the verification, had a certificate of compliance under section 363A.36 revoked or suspended based on the provisions of section 363A.36, with the revocation or suspension becoming final because it was upheld by the Office of Administrative Hearings or was not appealed to the office;* 5. The contractor or related entity has not received a final determination assessing a monetary sanction from the Department of Administration or Transportation for failure to meet targeted group business, disadvantaged business enterprise, or veteran-owned business goals, due to a lack of good faith effort, more than once during the three-year period before submitting the verification; and* 6. The contractor or related entity is not currently suspended or debarred by the federal government or the state of Minnesota or any of its departments, commissions, agencies, or political subdivisions that have authority to debar a contractor. *Any violations, suspensions, revocations, or sanctions, as defined in clauses 2 to 5 occurring prior to July 1, 2014, shall not be considered in determining whether a contractor or related entity meets the minimum criteria. Certification By signing this document, I am certifying that I am an owner or officer of the contractor and am verifying under oath that: 1. Contractor is in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.285, and 2. I have included Attachment A-1. Contractor Company Name Date Authorized Signature of Owner or Officer Printed Name Title 261 GC-69 224769v1 ATTACHMENT A-1: FIRST-TIER SUBCONTRACTORS LIST (Initial List) Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.285, subdivision 5. A prime contractor or subcontractor shall include in its verification of compliance . . . a list of all of its first-tier subcontractors that it intends to retain for work on the project. SUBMIT WITH CONTACTOR SOLICITATION RESPONSE NAME OF FIRST TIER SUBCONTRACTORS (Legal name of company as registered with the Secretary of State) Company Address Work to be Performed 262 GC-69 224769v1 NOTICE OF AWARD Dated , 20 TO: (BIDDER) ADDRESS: PROJECT OWNER’S CONTRACT NO. CONTRACT FOR You are notified that your Bid dated , 20 or the above Contract has been considered. You are the apparent Successful Bidder and have been awarded a contract for The Contract Price of your contract is and xx/100......................................................................................... Dollars ($ ). copies of each of the proposed Contract Documents (except Drawings) accompany this Notice of Award. sets of the Drawings will be delivered separately or otherwise made available to you immediately. You must comply with the following conditions precedent within fifteen days of the date of this Notice of Award, that is by , 20 . 1. You must deliver to the OWNER fully executed counterparts of the Agreement including all the Contract Documents. Each of the Contract Documents must bear your signature. 2. You must deliver with the executed Agreement the Performance Bond and Payment Bond as specified in the General Conditions. 3. You must deliver with the executed Agreement a Certificate of Insurance as specified in the General Conditions. 263 GC-70 224769v1 NOTICE TO PROCEED Dated , 20 TO: (CONTRACTOR) ADDRESS: PROJECT OWNER’S CONTRACT NO. CONTRACT FOR You are notified that the Contract Times under the above contract will commence to run on , 20 . By that date, you are to start performing your obligations under Contract Documents. In accordance with Article 3 of the Agreement, the dates of Substantial Completion and completion and readiness for final payment are , 20 , and , 20 . Before you may start any Work at the site, you must CITY OF CHANHASSEN (OWNER) By: (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) (TITLE) ACCEPTANCE OF AWARD (CONTRACTOR) By: (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) (TITLE) (DATE) 264 GC-71 224769v1 9.19 AS-BUILT REQUIREMENTS Upon completion of construction and acceptance of the final punchlist, all elements of the project shall be remeasured with an as-built field survey. The as-built plans shall be corrected and modified to show correct distances, elevations, dimensions, and any other change in the specific detail of the plans. All changes shall be drawn to scale to accurately represent the work constructed. All elevation/length changes shall be crossed out and correct information added and all locations updated on the as-built plans. Upon completion of all public utility and street improvement projects and within 60 days of acceptance of the final punchlist, the project engineer shall supply a set of as-built drawings and tie-cards in .pdf format to the City for review. If changes or corrections are required, the as-built plans and tie cards will be returned to the project engineer showing any corrections to be made as marked in red. Once all changes to the as-built plans have been made and approved by the City, the project engineer shall supply the City with all submittals required under Section 2. Electronic Documents, below. 1. As-built Requirements: A. Indicate on the cover sheet of the as-built drawings the benchmark system, the contractor(s) that performed the street and/or utility improvements, the Engineer of Record, and if applicable the Developer. The top nut on each fire hydrant shall be noted and used as a benchmark. B. All curb boxes, gate valves, and draintile clean-outs shall be located by swing ties shown on the as-built plans and shall be measured in the field at the time of installation. 1. Curb box swing ties are to be supplied on the City of Chanhassen's standard tie card (Detail Plate No. 5221). 2. Swing ties to permanent structures such as manholes, catch basins, fire hydrants, etc. shall be no longer than 100 feet in length. 3. Utility boxes, trees, property corners are not acceptable swing tie points. 4. If a permanent structure is not available within the 100-foot length, or there is no sanitary sewer to properly reference a station of the curb stop at the property line from a downstream manhole, a third tie point of not more than 150 feet is to be supplied or tied between curb boxes. C. The water main profile shall be shown with the appropriate information as to size, type of pipe, depth of cover, location of vertical bends, and any insulation. D. All sanitary and storm sewer lines shall be shown in plan and profile with the appropriate information as to size, type of material, length, class of pipe, vertical separation (in feet) of utility crossings, grade and elevations. E. All manholes shall be numbered in both plan and profile view utilizing the approved City’s nomenclature. All inverts, top of casting or rim elevations, depth of manhole and stationing shall be provided. Stationing of sanitary sewer wyes shall be provided from 265 GC-71 224769v1 the downstream manhole. F. If water and sewer services are not located in the same trench, it shall be noted on the as-built plans. G. If sanitary sewer service risers are constructed, the elevation (z) and coordinates (x, y) of the riser shall be provided and shown on the profile view to scale. H. The storm sewer as-built plans shall provide the limits of all ponding (normal and high water elevations), acres-feet of storage, outlet control structure details (including all invert elevations), and typical sections for each stormwater BMP. I. Prior to acceptance, all stormwater BMPs shall be field surveyed. The Engineer of Record shall confirm the BMPs have been constructed per the approved design. 1. The most recent Stormwater BMP Compliance and Acceptance Form shall be provided for each stormwater BMP installed in conjunction with the project prior to acceptance. J. The grading as-built plan must have spot elevations on all lot corners, building pads, swales/berms, emergency overflows and all other critical drainage areas. K. The storm sewer as-built plans shall include all drainage culverts, original and final grade of cover over pipe on the profile view if not indicated on street grade profile. L. The street as-built plans shall indicate the original and final grades as constructed, type of curb/gutter, sidewalk, draintile and associated clean-outs, manhole castings, hydrants, street width (back of curb to back of curb), right-of-way width, and curve data. 1. Any sub-base excavation performed in efforts to correct unstable soil conditions shall be shown on the as-built plans indicating depth of sub-cut, sub-cut from station to station, type of backfill (select granular, size of rock, etc.), and location by center line station of any fabric that may have been used. 2. The most recent MnDOT ADA Compliance Checklist (Curb Ramp) shall be provided for each curb ramp installed in conjunction with the project. M. All draintile used on the project shall be shown on the as-built street and storm drainage plans. The as-built plans shall also provide the size of pipe and depth installed. N. The lot and block numbers from the approved final plat and any easements which exist shall be shown on the as-built plans. O. Each as-built plan sheet shall indicate the date of installation, labeled as as-built or record plan, and the contractor who performed the work for the associated street and/or utility improvements. P. All trace wire access boxes shall be shown on the as-built plan. A note shall be added next to each box labeling the utility that it locates. 266 GC-71 224769v1 2. Electronic Format A. All construction plans must be submitted electronically to the City in AutoCAD .DWG or .DXF format in Carver County Coordinates within 120 days after completion of construction and acceptance of the final punchlist. In AutoCAD combine the XREFs to the layout drawings. All survey GPS data collected for the as-built plans must be delivered as a text file (.CSV) or GIS dataset (shapefile, Esri geodatabse). The data must include corresponding as-built structure reference numbers/ids for each corresponding GPS record. Each GPS record must include X, Y coordinates and Z elevation values. Data delivered must adhere to the horizontal control and vertical control requirements as defined in requirements found under subsection D. and E., below. B. The electronic plans shall be submitted within three folders. The first folder should contain .DWG or .DXF drawings. 1. AS-BUILT PLAN SET (DWG): This folder should contain the entire as-built plan set and any drawings or pictures referenced to the plan set. It should also contain drawings related to the existing utilities and the proposed utilities submitted as construction drawings. 2. AS-BUILT PLAN SET (PDF): This folder should contain signed, full size copies of the plan set and final plat in .pdf format. 3. TIE CARDS: This folder should contain the tie cards submitted in .pdf format. Refer to City Detail Plate 5221 for tie card requirements. C. All electronic files must be accompanied by a “layer description list” which defines what each layer name represents within the drawing (e.g. “E-SAN is the existing sanitary sewer”, etc.). Only active layers need to be defined. D. Horizontal Control of the Construction Record Drawings and Final Plat must be on the Carver County Coordinate System. E. Vertical Control of the Construction Record Drawings must be on the City’s Benchmark System. The vertical control loop tying the project to the City’s benchmark must be submitted with the record drawings. 267 i 2023 STREET CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.00 - GRADING 1.01 Clearing and Grubbing ..................................................................................................... 1 1.02 Excavation and Embankment .......................................................................................... 1 1.03 Subgrade Preparation and Correction .............................................................................. 1 1.04 Application of Water ........................................................................................................ 2 SECTION 2.00 - BASE MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION 2.01 Aggregate Base ................................................................................................................ 4 2.02 Materials ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.03 Requirements ................................................................................................................... 4 2.04 Acceptance Testing .......................................................................................................... 6 2.05 Specified Density Method ............................................................................................... 7 2.06 Aggregate Composition ................................................................................................... 7 2.07 Schedule of Price Reductions ........................................................................................ 12 SECTION 3.00 - PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION 3.01 Plant-Mixed Bituminous Asphalt .................................................................................. 14 3.02 City of Chanhassen Compaction Test Method .............................................................. 14 3.03 Bituminous Patching ...................................................................................................... 15 3.04 Bituminous Tack Coat ................................................................................................... 15 3.05 Mill Pavement Surface ................................................................................................... 16 3.06 Bituminous Overlay ....................................................................................................... 17 SECTION 4.00 - MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION 4.01 Subsurface Drain Tile .................................................................................................... 19 4.02 Utilities ........................................................................................................................... 19 4.03 Warranty ......................................................................................................................... 20 4.04 Water to Homes ............................................................................................................. 20 4.05 Concrete ......................................................................................................................... 20 4.06 Bituminous Curb ............................................................................................................ 23 4.07 Bituminous Trail/Pathway ............................................................................................. 23 4.08 Electric Lighting Systems (Street Lighting) .................................................................. 24 4.09 Fence Restoration .......................................................................................................... 27 4.10 Pavement Markings ....................................................................................................... 27 4.11 Street Signs and Posts .................................................................................................... 28 4.12 Protection and Restoration of Vegetation ...................................................................... 29 4.13 Erosion Control .............................................................................................................. 30 268 ii 4.14 Turf Establishment ......................................................................................................... 30 4.15 Geotextile Stabilization Fabric ...................................................................................... 34 4.16 Segmented Masonry Retaining Wall Units (2411) ....................................................... 34 4.17 Minor Concrete Structures ............................................................................................. 38 4.18 Segmental Masonry Retaining Wall Surface Sealing ................................................... 40 4.19 Pedestrian Curb Ramps .................................................................................................. 40 269 1 SECTION 1.00 - GRADING 1.01 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (2101) All clearing and grubbing shall be performed in accordance with and the basis of payment shall be made as per Section 2101 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications, with the following amendment: All costs associated with clearing and grubbing shall be considered incidental to the project, unless a separate bid item is included in the proposal form. Clearing shall be under the direction of the engineer in the field and care will be required to protect all trees not removed. All timber, stumps, roots and other debris or by-products resulting from the clearing and grubbing operation shall be disposed of off the site. 1.02 EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT (2105) All site grading and street construction of excavation and embankment shall be in accordance with Section 2106 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specification with the following modifications: A. Requirements The following compaction requirements shall be met for all embankment and trench backfilling relative to subgrade under this contract: 1. The zone below the upper 3 feet of the embankment or trench shall be compacted to 95 percent of standard proctor density. 2. The zone from 3 feet below subgrade to finished subgrade (upper 3 feet) shall be compacted to 100 percent of standard proctor density. B. Excessive Moisture If the existing moisture content of the backfill material below three feet of subgrade is greater than 3 percentage points above the optimum moisture content, the soil shall be compacted to a minimum density of 3 pounds per cubic feet less than the standard Proctor curve at that moisture content. At no time shall the density be less than 90 percent of the standard Proctor density. This modification of the compaction specification shall at no time be used or applied to the upper 3 feet of the subgrade or the aggregate base. 1.03 SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND CORRECTION (2112) Subgrade preparation and correction shall be performed in accordance with the following: The contractor shall prepare the subgrade to the grade, compaction and stabilization to a depth of one foot (1') below subgrade elevation. All work in preparing the subgrade to this one-foot depth shall be considered incidental. 270 2 Test or proof rolling shall be performed on the completed subgrade prior to addition of base materials. The contractor will furnish a tandem truck loaded with a minimum of 14 tons to check the completed subgrade and/or base. This truck will be driven near the curb and gutter locations on both sides of the roadway and in other locations the Engineer may direct, to determine if any soft spots exist so that these areas may be removed and replaced with satisfactory material before completing subgrade or base preparation, subject to Engineer approval. Cost of furnishing the loaded truck and driver for the test roll and any retests shall be incidental to construction of the subgrade and/or base and no direct compensation will be made therefore. A. If, in the Engineer’s opinion, based on the test roll, there are any sections of the road subgrade that are unstable, the contractor shall, at his/her expense, scarify the roadbed and aerate or add moisture to the material as necessary and re-compact the material to the extent that it will be stable when re-tested by rolling. B. However, where test failures re-occur and the Engineer is satisfied that the corrective measures were exhausted, then a qualified soils engineer shall be retained to recommend corrective measures (i.e. subcut, fabric, draintile). Upon review of the soils report, the City Engineer shall determine an alternative to produce acceptable stability on the roadbed. The unstable sections shall be repaired by the contractor as directed by the Engineer and at the owner's expense. In the event subgrade subcut efforts are deemed necessary to correct any unsuitable soils in the road section, at the Engineers discretion three inch minus and/or a granular (free draining) backfill meeting the requirements of MnDOT Section 3149.2 "D.3 Select Granular Backfill" shall be used. In addition, if the road section is in need of subgrade removal, the depth of removal shall be consistent throughout the entire road section with the exception of a small isolated area. The practice of varying depths of subcut in a continuous section of road will not be allowed. In roadbeds where existing soil subcuts have been performed, drain tile and cleanouts in low areas and any other areas deemed necessary by the Engineer shall be installed as per standard detail plate nos. 5232, 5233 and 5234. 1.04 APPLICATION OF WATER (2130) This work shall consist of furnishing and applying water for dust control or moisture content within the Project limits as directed by the Engineer or stipulated in the Contract. A. Materials The water shall be furnished by the Contractor and it shall be reasonably clean. The Contractor shall make all arrangements with the City’s Utility Superintendent for obtaining any water which may be needed for the construction. No water may be taken from any City hydrants unless authorized in writing by the Utility Superintendent. Failure to obtain City authorization will result in prosecution and fines within the limits of city ordinance. B. Construction Requirements 271 3 1. Equipment Water supply tanks shall be equipped with distributing bars or other apparatus that will ensure uniform application of the water. Application of water on the road shall be with a self-propelled distributor of the pressure type, mounted on pneumatic-tired wheels. Pump capacity shall be sufficient to permit application of the whole load uniformly at any rate up to 250 gallons per minute. 2. Application The water supply and equipment used shall be sufficient to apply the quantity required within the time interval necessary to secure optimum results and avoid unwarranted loss of water through evaporation, absorption, or drainage. The water shall be applied at such times and in such quantities as the Engineer approves. C. Method of Measurement Water applied for Dust Control or moisture content within the Project limits, by direct order of the Engineer, will be considered Incidental to the Project unless a specific bid item is provided. If a bid item is provided, deductions may be made for any water wasted through failure of the Contractor to coordinate the application of water with other operations as may be directed. D. Basis of Payment If a bid item is provided, payment for the accepted quantities of water at the Contract price per unit of measure will be compensation in full for all costs of furnishing, transporting, and applying the water as directed. These provisions apply to water used for dust control within the Project limits as directed by the Engineer. These provisions do not apply to any sprinkling or other uses for water required in conjunction with the construction of concrete pavements; to any water used in the production or curing of concrete; to any water used to maintain plant life; to any water used in conjunction with compacting soil and aggregate; or to any water used for dust control in any Contractor selected haul roads, detours, or work sites outside of the Project limits; all costs of which will be incidental to the Contract items involved. When a bid item is provided, payment for the application of water will be made on the basis of the following schedule: Item No. Item Unit 2130.501 Water Gallon 272 4 SECTION 2.00 - BASE MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION 2.01 AGGREGATE BASE (2211) The contractor shall place and compact the aggregate base of the class and depth specified. All aggregate base and its placement shall conform to Section 2211 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specification. Aggregate base shall be paid for by the number of cubic yards as calculated from the design widths, depths and lengths. No payment shall be made for additional material used due to low subgrades, spillage, tolerances, etc. Prior to the placement of any aggregate base material, all soil reports and compaction tests including previous tests on utilities must be reviewed by the City. 2.02 MATERIALS A. Aggregate 3138 The class of aggregate to be used in each course will be shown in the contract. Gradation acceptance for Classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 aggregates will be by the random sampling method in accordance with 2211.3D.1. 2.03 REQUIREMENTS A. Spreading and Compacting At the time of spreading the base material for compaction, the aggregate shall be so uniformly mixed that it will meet specified gradation requirements, based on the results of gradation tests run on aggregate samples obtained after mixing and prior to compaction. The material for each layer shall be spread and compacted to the required cross section and density before placing aggregate thereon for a succeeding layer. The surface of each layer shall be maintained, with uniform texture and firmly keyed particles, until the next layer required by the contract is placed thereon or until the completed base is accepted if no other construction is required thereon. Compaction shall be obtained by the: 1. Specified density method, 2. Quality compaction method, or 3. Penetration index method 273 5 whichever method is prescribed for the particular course. Compaction by the specified density method will be required on all base courses except those that are otherwise designated in the contract for compaction by either the quality compaction or penetration index method. If Class 5C or Class 5BC is specified or substituted for another class of aggregate, then densification shall only be obtained by the quality compaction method or the penetration index method. B. Penetration Index Method The full thickness of each layer of Classes 5 or 6 shall be compacted to achieve passing results in a modified DCP or a penetration index value less than or equal to 10 mm per blow, as determined by a MnDOT standard dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) device. For test purposes, a layer will be considered to be 75 mm in compacted thickness but a testing layer can be increased in thickness to a maximum of 150 mm if compacted in one lift by a vibratory roller. At least two passing dynamic cone penetrometer tests shall be conducted at selected sites within each 800 cubic meters (CV) of constructed base course. If a test fails to meet the specified requirements, the material represented by the test shall be recompacted and will be retested for density compliance. All aggregates prescribed to be tested under the Penetration Index Method 2211.3D.2.c must be tested and approved within 24 hours of placement and final compaction. Beyond the 24 hour limit, the same aggregate can only be accepted by the Specific Density Method 2211.3D.2.a. Water shall be applied to the base material during the mixing, spreading and compacting operations when and in the quantities the Engineer considers necessary for proper compaction. C. Determination of Penetration Index Value The Penetration Index Value will be determined using a MnDOT standard dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) device. The basic test method can be found in the MnDOT User Guide to the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and the detailed test methods and procedures for base and shouldering aggregate are available from the Grading and Base Office, Maplewood. D. Random Sampling Gradation Acceptance Method The following provision shall apply to the use of Classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 aggregates: Gradation Control The contractor and/or aggregate producer shall be responsible for maintaining a gradation control program in accordance with the random sampling acceptance method described in the Grading and Base manual. The contractor will be permitted to proceed with and complete the base construction on the basis of the contractor’s Certification (on Form 24346 furnished by the engineer) that the material supplied and used conforms to the appropriate specification 274 6 requirements. The contractor shall assume full responsibility for the production and placement of uniform and acceptable materials. 2.04 ACCEPTANCE TESTING Aggregate gradation compliance will be determined in accordance with the following table: ACCEPTANCE TESTING SCHEDULE(A) Quantity ((metric tons (t))(a)(b) No. Lots(c) No. Samples(d)(e) or No. Sublots/Lot(f) Payment Acceptance Schedule Less than 500 NA Use Form 2415 or 2403 (small quantity) See Chanhassen’s General Condition 6.09 > 500 but less than 4,000 NA 1/1,000t(g) See Chanhassen’s General Condition 6.09 > 4,000 but less than 10,000 1(h)(i) 4(j) See Chanhassen’s General Condition 6.09 A. In accordance with section 1503 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specification, Conformity with Contract Documents, it is the intent of these specifications that materials and workmanship shall be uniform in character and shall conform to the prescribed target value or to the middle portion of the tolerance range. The purpose of the tolerance range is to accommodate occasional minor variations from the median zone. The production and processing of the materials and the performance of the work shall be so controlled that the material or workmanship will not be of borderline quality. B. Or equivalent in cubic meters loose volume or cubic meters compacted volume ((1t – 0.6m3 (LV) or 1t – 0.46m3 (CV), respectively)). C. The use of any one kind or class of material from more than one source is prohibited without permission of the engineer according to section 1601 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specification. If the contractor changes sources (with the engineer’s approval), a new lot consisting of four sublots will be established provided that the quantity equals or exceeds 4,000t. When a material source is changed prior to completing a lot, the remainder of the 4 samples will be taken from the previously placed materials, provided that the quantity equals or exceeds 4,000t. However, if the quantity placed is less than 4,000t, acceptance testing will be based on one test per thousand metric ton. D. Samples for gradation testing will be taken randomly by the engineer prior to compaction, in accordance with the random sampling method described in the Grading and Base Manual. 275 7 E. Classes 1, 2, 5C and 5BC, Shoulder Surfacing Aggregate, may be sampled from the stockpile for testing and acceptance in accordance with section 3138.3 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specification. F. Each lot will be divided into four sublots which are approximately equal in quantity. G. Each individual sample will be analyzed separately for payment. H. Each lot shall consist of a maximum of approximately 10,000t of material, although lesser sized lots may occur due to construction constraints. I. Each lot will be analyzed separately for payment. J. One gradation sample will be taken from each sublot and tested. The results obtained from the four samples will be averaged for payment to the nearest one-tenth of one percent for the specified sieves. The engineering firm will have each sample tested in the field by a MnDOT certified technician or may submit them to the district laboratory for testing. A delay of at least three (3) working days is anticipated before laboratory tests results are available but a maximum of eight (8) working hours delay is anticipated for field gradations. Non-complying material shall be dealt with in accordance with the City of Chanhassen’s General Conditions Section 6.09. 2.05 SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD The full depth of aggregate base shall be compacted to not less than 100% of the maximum density and at the time of compaction the moisture content of the material shall not be less than 65% of optimum moisture. All failing moisture and density tests must be corrected before the project is complete. 2.06 AGGREGATE COMPOSITION (3138) Scope Provide certified aggregate along with Form G&B-104 for 2118, 2211 and 2221. Note that Class 5Q, which a designer may designate for use as a base, would most commonly be produced at a quarry. Requirements A. General Use aggregate sources meeting the requirements of 1601, “Source of Supply and Quality.” 276 8 Provide certified aggregate materials that have uniform: appearance, texture, moisture content and performance characteristics. Provide binder soils from sources meeting the requirements of 3146, “Binder Soil.” Add binder soils during the crushing and screening operations. B. Virgin Materials Provide virgin aggregates meeting the following requirements: 1. Comprised of naturally occurring mineral materials, and contains no topsoil, organics or disintegrating rock as defined in Laboratory Manual Section 1209, 2. Class 2 must be composed of 100% crushed quarry rock, and 3. Conforms to the quality requirements of the latest edition of Table 3138.2-1. C. Recycled Materials The Contactor may substitute recycled aggregates for virgin aggregates, if meeting the following requirements: 1. Recycled aggregates contain only recycled asphalt pavement (RAP), recycled concrete materials, recycled aggregate materials, or certified recycled glass, and 2. Must meet the requirements of the latest edition of Table 3138.2-2. 277 9 D. Surfacing Aggregates Provide surfacing aggregates in accordance with 3138.2A, “General,” 3138.2B, “Virgin Materials,” and 3138.2C, “Recycled Materials,” and meeting the following requirements: 1. 100 percent (100%) of the material passes the ¾ in [19.0 mm] sieve, regardless of the class specified, 2. Does not contain glass, 3. Recycled concrete materials only may only be used for the roadway shoulders, 4. There is no restriction on the bitumen content, if used for shouldering, Note: Class 2 must be composed of 100% crushed quarry rock per 3138.2B3. E. Gradation Requirements 1. For products containing less than 25 percent (25%) recycled materials, conform to the latest edition of Table 3138-3. 2. For products containing 25 percent (25%) or more recycled materials and less than 75% recycled concrete, conform to the latest edition of Table 3138-4. 3. For products containing 75 percent (75%) or more recycled concrete, conform to the latest edition of Table 3138-5. 4. Perform gradation tests prior to bituminous extraction, and 5. Provide Aggregate with a minimum clay content of 3 percent and Plasticity Index (PI) of 5-12. The requirements for PI and minimum clay content are fulfilled if one of the following are met: a) the Material composed of at least 25 percent recycled Materials b) the Material composed of at least 50 percent crushed quarry Aggregate 278 10 279 11 F. Sampling and Testing Report the No. 200 sieve results to the nearest 0.1 percent and all other sieve results to the nearest 1percent (1%). A Sampling, Sieve Analysis and Crushing Tests Grading and Base Manual B Los Angeles Rattler Loss Laboratory Manual Method ................................ 1210 C Shale Tests Laboratory Manual Method .......................................... 1207 & 1209 D Bitumen Content Laboratory Manual Method ............................................ 1852 280 12 E Insoluble Residue Laboratory Manual Method ........................................... 1221 F Reclaimed Glass AGI Visual Method ................. (AGI Data sheet 15.1 and 15.2) 2.07 SCHEDULE OF PRICE REDUCTIONS The following schedule for price reductions on non-complying construction material shall be used when not addressed in the Contract. The following schedule of price adjustments and/or corrective action for non-compliance material and/or work is a guideline only. Special circumstances may result in price reductions differing from this schedule. These special circumstances shall be determined and evaluated by the City Engineer. Price reductions are implemented only if it is in the best interest of the City to leave the non- complying material in place, otherwise, the material should be removed and replaced. Gradation Failures A. MnDOT Specification 3138, Aggregate for Surface and Base Courses. 1. Class 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 designations. The above classes of material should be accepted for payment in accordance with the provisions of the City of Chanhassen’s General Conditions Section 6.09. Price reductions for more than one failing sieve size shall be accumulative, but will not exceed 50.0 percent. The compensation due to the contractor should be reduced accordingly. B. MnDOT Specification 3149, Granular Material. The granular materials listed in MnDOT Specification 3149 should be accepted for payment in accordance with the following: 1. All Sieves Price adjustments shall be in accordance with MnDOT specs 2. # 200/1 inch or 75mm/25 mm. Ratio (MnDOT Specification 3149.2.B1 and 3149.2.B2) % Outside Specified Limits* +1.0 Substantial Compliance +1.1 - 2.0 5.0% Price Reduction 2.1 - 3.0 15.0% Price Reduction 281 13 >3.0 Corrective Action Required *Based on individual sample test results. Price adjustment applied to the quantity of non-compliance material represented by the sample. The compensation due to the contractor should be reduced accordingly. C. The Contractor may correct the quantity of non-compliance material in order to qualify for full payment. When corrective action is required for acceptance of the non- complying material, in accordance with the previously indicated schedules, the Contractor shall perform the corrective work at no cost to the Owner. The Contractor shall remove the unacceptable material and replace with acceptable materials, or correct the unacceptable materials on the road. The corrected material will be tested for compliance with the specification after the completion of the corrective action. In lieu of replacement or correction, the Engineers may allow (in the best interest of the City) the Contractor to accept a price reduction instead of corrective action. 282 14 SECTION 3.00 – PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION 3.01 PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS ASPHALT (2360) This Specification requires the Contractor to follow of the most current MnDOT Standard Specification and provide a mix that complies with all of the design, production, and placement requirements of the specification. The Department does not make any guaranty or warranty, either express or implied, that compliance with one part of this specification guarantees that the Contractor will meet the other aspects of the specification. A. Description This work consists of the construction of one or more pavement courses of hot plant mixed asphalt-aggregate mixture on the approved prepared foundation, base course or existing surface in accordance with the specifications and in conformity with the lines, grades, thicknesses and typical cross sections shown on the plans or established by the Engineer. Mixture design will be 2360 (gyratory) as described in the Special Provisions or the Standard Detail Plates through the mixture designation. 3.02 CITY OF CHANHASSEN COMPACTION TEST METHOD For the specified density method of compaction, each lift shall be uniformly compacted to a density not less than what is required per Table 2360.3-1. The density test shall be in accordance with MnDOT Bituminous Specifications 2360 and the MnDOT Bituminous Manual. Compaction testing will be performed for the owner by an independent testing laboratory approved by the Engineer as identified below. The cost of all tests will be paid by the contractor. A. One (1) sample for a density test per 200 tons of mix installed or a minimum of two (2) sample per job. B. In-place density test performed by one of the following procedures as directed by the Engineer: 1. A minimum of one (1) core sample for in-place density tests per 200 tons of mix installed or a minimum of four (4) cores per job. No cores are to be taken in the wheel tracks. 2. Four (4) density test taken with a portable nuclear testing device at randomly selected locations per 200 tons of mix installed. A minimum of six (6) tests per job. The mixture with failing density will not be accepted for payment at the Contract bid price, but, in lieu of being removed and replaced, will be accepted at a reduced price in accordance with Table 2360-22. The appropriate pay factor will be applied to the quantity of mixture represented by the failing density test. One retest of each failing test will be permitted and the higher of the two densities will be used in determining the pay factor. All retesting shall be 283 15 done within three (3) working days after placement of the bituminous mixture. The Contractor will be responsible for the costs of all retesting. 3.03 BITUMINOUS PATCHING Over any areas that need to be corrected (settlements, bird baths, etc.) one of the following methods as required by the Engineer should be used for patching: A. Wedge cut one inch (1") into the existing pavement around the outer limits of the area that needs to be patched, tack and fill with approved bituminous material. B. Tack area to be patched then skin patch with approved bituminous material and apply a seal coat over patched areas. Seal coat should be trap rock and applied as per Section 3.09 Bituminous Seal Coat. C. Bituminous materials to be used in patch areas shall be in accordance with Section 2231 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specification unless otherwise directed by the engineer. D. Straight line cut (mill/colter wheel or saw cut) and remove. Tack edges to be patched and fill with approved bituminous material. Patching shall be done in such a manner to produce a smooth driving surface of which the patch or patch edge shall not deviate from surrounding pavement. Milling of patches will be required when any deviation occurs. In areas where, in a 100-foot length of street, measured from any area in need of repair or in either direction and three or more patches/settlements are evident, a one and one-half inch bituminous overlay shall be constructed over the entire length and width of the affected street section. In areas where trench settlements (of any kind) have occurred, corrections may be performed by either the above-listed methods, or if, in the opinion of the Engineer, the existing bituminous is in satisfactory condition, it may be repaired by a bituminous leveling course. Prior to any overlays deemed necessary, a minimum four-foot wide edge mill along the gutter line shall be completed and any settlements shall be filled with bituminous material, leveled out, and thoroughly compacted. 3.04 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT The bituminous material for tack coat shall be applied in accordance with Section 2357 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specification. The rate of application shall be in accordance with Table 2357.3-1 or as approved by the engineer. Tack coat shall be applied in a manner that will allow traffic movement on at least one side of the street at all times without pick up or tracking of tack coat material. 284 16 At no time will the application of tack coat be applied by means other than a motor powered distributor. 3.05 MILL PAVEMENT SURFACE A. Description This work shall consist of improving the profile, cross slope, and surface texture of an existing pavement surface by machine (cold) milling preparatory to placement of another course thereon. B. Equipment Pavement milling shall be accomplished with a power operated, self-propelled cold milling machine capable of removing concrete and bituminous surface material as necessary to produce the required profile, cross slope, and surface texture uniformly across the pavement surface. The machine shall also be equipped with means to control dust and other particulate matter created by the cutting action. The machine shall be equipped to accurately and automatically establish profile grades along each edge of the machine, within plus or minus 1/8 inch (3 mm), by referencing from the existing pavement by means of a ski or matching shoe, or from an independent grade control. The machine shall be controlled by an automatic system for controlling grade, elevation, and cross slope at a given rate. C. Operations The pavement surface shall be milled to the depth, width, grade, and cross slope as shown in the Plans or as otherwise directed by the Engineer. Machine speeds shall be varied to produce the desired surface texture grid pattern. Milling shall be performed without excessive tearing or gouging of the underlying material. The pavement milling operations shall be referenced from an independent grade control in those areas where the Engineer considers such control is essential. The control shall be established and maintained by the Contractor in a manner and in such position as the Engineer approves. Milling operations shall be conducted so that the entire pavement width is milled to a flush surface at the end of each work period, whenever the pavement is open to traffic. In case of uncompleted operations resulting in a vertical or near vertical longitudinal cutting face, it shall be the Contractor’s responsibility to minimize the hazardous effects to traffic by resloping the longitudinal face to provide a suitable taper, by constructing a temporary bituminous taper, or by otherwise providing the necessary protective measures, as approved by the Engineer. Transverse cutting faces shall be tapered at the end of each working period where traffic is permitted. To further provide for traffic, the Contractor shall also construct temporary 285 17 bituminous tapers at intersecting streets, around utility appurtenances, and at all appropriate entrances during the milling operations, as ordered by the Engineer. The Contractor shall construct the temporary milled tapers and furnish, place, and remove temporary bituminous tapers as incidental work for which no direct compensation will be made. In areas inaccessible to the milling machine, the work shall be accomplished by other equipment or methods acceptable to the Engineer. After the milling operations are completed to the planned depth, the milled area shall be cleaned by sweeping or vacuuming with equipment approved by the Engineer. Such cleaning shall be performed to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Debris resulting from milling and cleaning operations shall be disposed of outside of the Right of Way except as otherwise authorized by the Engineer. Milling at previously patched areas shall be performed to the required depth below the pavement surface existing prior to the previous patch being placed, and not from the surface of the patch. The contractor shall take care to avoid disturbing or damaging any existing drainage or utility structures on the Project. Any damage resulting from the Contractor’s operations shall be repaired by the Contractor at no expense to the City. D. Method of Measurement (2232.4) Pavement milling will be measured by the area of each type of surface removed. Measurements will be of those areas milled as specified, based on actual finished dimensions of the work. E. Basis of Payment (2232.5) Payment of pavement milling at the appropriate Contract price per unit of measure will be compensation in full for all costs of performing the work as specified, including, but not limited to, traffic control, cleanup, and disposal operations. Payment for pavement milling will be made on the basis of the following schedule: Item No. Item Unit 2232.504 Mill Bituminous Surface square yard (square meter) 3.06 BITUMINOUS OVERLAY This work shall consist of constructing a pavement overlay course of hot plant mixed bituminous aggregate mixture on a prior approved prepared surface. It shall be constructed in a manner that when complete, all low or high areas of the overlay surface have been adequately tolerated to 286 18 provide a smooth profile, cross slope and exhibit satisfactory ride ability. Overlays for all streets shall consist of a minimum of two inches in compacted depth and meet all construction and material specifications as stated in Section 3.00. Material for overlays shall meet MnDOT 2360 specification and shall be specified in the project documents. 287 19 SECTION 4.00 - MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION 4.01 SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE (2502) See Section 2.19 of Sanitary and Storm Sewer Specifications. 4.02 UTILITIES A. Unless specified otherwise, this work shall be entirely at the contractor's expense. 1. There shall be an inspection of the sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main utilities prior to the start of construction. The contractor shall notify the Engineer 24 hours in advance to aid in accomplishing this inspection. All deficiencies in these existing systems prior to beginning street construction must be immediately brought to the attention of the Engineer. 2. After the manholes and valve boxes are cleaned, and raised to proper grade prior to paving the wear course, they shall be inspected to assure trouble free operation. 3. The contractor shall be responsible for locating all curb boxes within the limits of the project. The City has location ties to the curb boxes. The contractor shall notify the Engineer at least 24 hours in advance of this location work so that a representative of the Engineer can be present at all times while this work is being done and to aid in the accomplishment of this work. This work shall be done prior to start of construction. Prior to completion of the project, the curb boxes shall be adjusted to be flush with final grade. B. A final inspection of all utilities will be performed at the completion of the project for acceptance. Adjustments shall be made as follows: 1. Sanitary Sewer. All sanitary sewer manhole castings shall be left in place during the paving operation. The castings shall be adjusted before the mat is laid and shall be left one-quarter to one-half inch (1/4 – 1/2") below finished grade. Where the Engineer requires or where it is impossible to adjust the structure with the addition or removal of adjustment rings, reconstruction will be necessary. In such cases, it will be necessary to add or remove manhole sections. 2. Storm Sewer. Existing storm sewer castings shall be adjusted where necessary to be two inches (2") below finished gutter line. In areas of surmountable curb, the top of casting shall match the top of curb. 3. Water Valve Boxes. All water valve boxes shall be adjusted prior to paving the wear course, and left one-quarter to one-half inch (1/4 – 1/2”) below finished grade. Thorough tamping of the material around the valve box is required. In the event the valve box cannot be adjusted without the use of extensions, the contractor shall remove the upper section, place the necessary extension and replace the upper section. 288 20 4. Grouting Adjusting Rings. Adjustment rings are required to be grouted; the contractor shall grout between rings, place the casting and-remove all excess grout on the inside of the manhole by wiping smooth with a gloved hand or similar instrument. Refer to detail plates for limitations on number of rings allowed. I and I shields to be installed as specified. 4.03 WARRANTY The contractor should take special note of the warranty provisions of these contract documents as detailed in Sections 3.04 and 9.16 of the General Conditions of the Contract which are included as part of this Standard Specification 4.04 WATER TO HOMES The contractor shall be responsible (until completion of the project) for providing water to any homes which have their individual water systems become inoperative due to dewatering operations during the project construction 4.05 CONCRETE (2531) A. Concrete Curb and Gutter and Driveway Aprons All concrete curb and gutter and driveways shall be constructed in accordance with Sections 2301, 2461 and 2531 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications, except as modified or altered below: 1. Driveway openings in the curb shall be constructed as shown on the plans, standard plates, or as directed by the Engineer in the field. 2. The contractor shall construct concrete gutters and driveway aprons as detailed on the City’s standard detail plates, and as located on the plans. 3. Localized panels or sections of concrete determined either by the plan set or Engineer to be saw cut, removed and replaced shall be joined to each adjacent panel by two grouted #4 epoxy coated rebar. 4. Delete that portion of Section 2531 which requires that the concrete curb and gutter joints be sealed with joint sealer material. 5. The contractor shall furnish without charge all concrete samples needed for test cylinders, slump tests, air entrainment tests, and other tests ordered by the Engineer. 6. For surmountable curb installations, all radii at intersections shall be B-618 concrete curb and gutter with a 5-foot taper section, on each side of the radius. 289 21 7. Where a curb machine is used, the contraction joints shall be formed (tooled) or sawed at 10 foot intervals as approved by the engineer to a depth of two inches (2") from all exposed surfaces. Provide full depth expansion joints where indicated on detail plates, on the plans, against fixed objects and/or at a maximum of 200 foot intervals. 8. After the concrete is finished and a transverse broomed surface texture provided, the contractor shall spray it with a spray membrane curing compound conforming to MnDOT specifications, Section 3754. 9. Section 2531.2A.1 shall be mix no. 3F52 with granite aggregate. 10. Section 2531.2A.2 shall be mix no. 3F32 with granite aggregate. 11. The use of High-early concrete pavement used by the Contractor will be incidental to the Contract Item unless specified otherwise in the Special Provisions. B. Concrete Sidewalk All concrete sidewalk shall be constructed according to Section 2521 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications and City Standard Detail Plates, except as modified or altered below: 1. Delete that portion of Section 2521 which requires that the sidewalk be sealed with joint sealer material. 2. Calcium Chloride Type 1 or 2, MnDOT Specification 3753 shall not exceed 2% of the weight of the cement incorporated into the mix. 3. Concrete used for sidewalk shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Section 2521, mix no. 3F52 with granite aggregate. C. Reduced Payment Associated With Deficient Strength Requirements On All Concrete Construction If the Specified Strength requirement has not been obtained on the date specified, the mixture with failing tests will not be accepted for payment at the Contract bid price. If the material strength is in a range within 95% of the specified strength, in lieu of being removed and replaced acceptably, will be accepted at a reduced price in accordance with the schedule shown below. All material below 95% of the specified strength will be removed and replaced to specified requirements. The appropriate pay factor will be applied to the quantity of mixture represented by the failing test. Two core samples of each failing test will be permitted and the higher of the two tests will be used in determining the pay factor. All re-testing shall be done within a time frame determined by the City Engineer. Strength Requirements Pay Factor (% Below Specified Minimum) (% of Contract Price) 290 22 0% ........................................................................................................................ 100% 0 to 1% .....................................................................................................................98% 1 to 2% .....................................................................................................................95% 2 to 3% .....................................................................................................................90% 3 to 4% .....................................................................................................................85% 4 to 5% .....................................................................................................................75% More than 5% ...............................................................................Remove and Replace The Contractor does not have the option of taking a price reduction in lieu of complying with the Specifications. Material not meeting requirements shall not knowingly be placed in the work. Should any non-conforming material be inadvertently placed in the work, it will be up to the City Engineer to determine whether the non-conforming work will be allowed to remain in place or removed and replaced or otherwise corrected to meet specifications. Non-conforming material that is allowed to remain in the project shall be subject to the price reductions listed below for the indicated test provided the material was placed to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Otherwise the Engineer may make the determination according to other procedures addressed in MnDOT Specification 1503. With failing or borderline material, make sure next load is tested before it is incorporated into the work. 1. General a) Price reductions that are not part of the Contract should not be issued unless the price reduction is in excess of $350. If the calculated price reduction is equal to or less than $350, it shall be documented as substantial compliance. At the discretion of the Engineer, several smaller price deductions may be lumped together to comply with the $350 minimum to alleviate a continuous marginal failure problem. b) Bid prices for the project in question should be reviewed prior to calculating a price reduction. If the bid prices are considerably below average prices, then the price reduction should be assessed based on: (1) the average bid price as determined by the City Engineer or (2) a fair market value. c) The price reduction shall represent only the quantity of material represented by the sample and actually used. Example: A quantity of ready mixed concrete is placed in the work. A slump test indicates failing material. Then the price reduction would only apply to that load of ready mix represented by the test, not by all concrete placed since the last passing test. 291 23 d) The price reduction will normally be the quantity represented by the failing test times price reduction per unit quantity (tons, gals, etc.) determined from the “Schedule of Price Reductions” times the bid price of (2) above. e) The following guide for price reductions on non-conforming construction materials shall be used when not addressed in the contract: D. Schedule of Price Reductions For Materials For Concrete Construction Slump / Air - Isolated tests (not consistently high or low) (See MnDOT Specification 2461). Slumps or air tests that are consistently high or low require corrective action by the Contractor’s quality control personnel. When test results are inconsistent or borderline, every load should be tested. 1. Slump out of compliance (see MnDOT Specification Table 2461.5-6) 2. Air Content Out of Compliance (See MnDOT Specification Table 2461.5-8) 3. Low Slump Concrete (See MnDOT Specification Table 2461.5-7) 4.06 BITUMINOUS CURB (2535) All bituminous curb shall be constructed in accordance with Section 2535 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specification, except as modified or altered below: A. Driveway openings in the curb shall be constructed as shown on the plans, standard plates, or as directed by the engineer in the field. B. The contractor shall provide all samples needed for tests ordered by the engineer. C. Where specified, a bituminous berm shall be constructed along the edge of the roadway instead of a bituminous curb. The bituminous berm shall meet the requirements of Section 2535 except that the berm shall be formed by a shoe attached to the paver. The berm section shall be as shown on the plans. D. Bituminous curb shall not be used to tie in catch basin inlets or manholes. Concrete sections shall be poured in these areas. 4.07 BITUMINOUS TRAIL/PATHWAY Bituminous trail/pathway shall be paved in such a way to minimize or eliminate cold joints, which may require milling or other means deemed necessary by the Engineer, when abutting existing infrastructure or other trails. Trail intersections shall be constructed with 20’ radii or as approved by the Engineer. This shall be done at no extra expense to the City. Trails shall be constructed in accordance with Standard Detail Plate 5216. 292 24 4.08 ELECTRIC LIGHTING SYSTEMS (STREET LIGHTING) A. General The street lighting system shall comprise all of the work shown on the respective plan and detail sheets for the system, complete, in place and in operation, all in accordance with the current Minnesota Department of Transportation “Standard Specifications and for Construction” except as shown and noted in the drawings and modified in these specifications. The distribution circuits of the lighting system shall consist of two conductors. The two conductors shall constitute 240 volt circuits. Lighting circuits shall be installed complete to each standard. All circuit wires including runs between light poles and street crossings shall be placed in conduit. Splice boxes or handholes shall be installed at all street crossings that serve an opposite side light pole. Power supply to the lighting system is unmetered 120/240 volt, single phase, alternating current. B. Permits and Inspections Obtain and pay for all permits and inspections required for the electrical work, arrange for inspections to be performed and furnish a Certificate of Final Inspection and approval by enforcement authorities. C. Standards The following industry standards are considered minimum requirements: 1. Standard rules and regulations of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. 2. Rules and regulations of the National Fire Protection Association - NFPA No. 70. 3. National Electrical Manufacturers Association Standards. 4. American National Standards Institute. 5. National Electrical Safety Code. 6. Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction 7. Other Industry Standard Listings per MnDOT 2545.2. 293 25 D. Codes, Ordinances and Regulations The National Electric Code, together with applicable state and city ordinances or regulations, shall be considered as establishing minimum requirements for the work. Ascertain the existence of, and comply with, any interpretations and/or enforcement policies of the local enforcement agencies or individuals peculiar to this area or to this particular installation. Where these specifications call for materials or construction of better quality or larger size than required by the above rules and regulations, the provisions of the specifications shall take precedence. E. Conduit All rigid steel conduits (R.S.C.) shall meet the requirements of MnDOT 3801. Rigid Steel Conduit (R.S.C.) shall be installed at all roadway crossings as shown in the Plans. The RSC shall be installed by auguring or jacking methods and not by open trenching across the roadways. When auguring or boring operations through a roadbed are abandoned for any reason, the resultant voids shall be grouted to the satisfaction of the Engineer. F. Conductors 1. Pole Wire - The pole wire from the in-line fuse connector and the distribution cables to the luminaries and photo cell wires shall be No. 12 AWG copper wires type R.H.W., T.H.W., or X.H.H.W. rated 600 volts. 2. Branch Circuit Conductors - The branch circuit conductors and feeder wires, shall by type T.H.W.N., or T.H.W., or type X.H.H.W. copper rated 600 volts. G. Fuses Light standards in the 240 volt system shall include in-line fuse holders with fuses (3 amps) in the phase conductors to the luminaire ballast. Breakaway fuse holders shall be installed at the handhole of the light standards. H. Grounding System shall be solidly grounded throughout. Lighting standards, lighting service cabinet, ground rods and any exposed metal system components shall be solidly bonded to the system equipment ground conductor with accessible mechanical approved grounding connectors. Ground rods shall be 5/8” x 15’ for lighting service cabinet and 5/8” x 10’ for lighting standards and shall be copperweld type. I. Feed Point 294 26 Power will be supplied to the system from utility owned pole or pad mounted transformer. Make all provisions and arrangements for service as required by the respective utility agency. Lighting service cabinet shall be pad mounted type T1 in accordance with MnDOT Standard Plate No. 8140A. Enclosure shall be a NEMA 3 rated minimum 12 gauge steel cabinet with gasketed full hinged doors and padlock hasps. Suitable galvanized steel anchor bolts with double nuts to be provided for concrete foundation mounting. Inside of cabinet shall be finished with white enamel on suitably prepared surface. Service cabinet equipment, as applicable, shall be as specified below, or equal. Lightning Arresters McGraw Edison Type L Panelboard Square D NQOB Circuit Breakers Square D Q1B & Q0 Contactor Allen Bradley Bulletin 500L Selector Switch Allen Bradley Bulletin 800H Lighting service cabinet concrete foundation shall be provided in accordance with City of Chanhassen’s Standard Plate No. 5243. The contractor shall furnish and install 2” R.S.C. stubouts from the lighting service cabinet through the foundation. One 2” R.S.C. shall be provided for the lighting service cabinet to the utility transformer and two conduits (2” R.S.C.) shall be provided for the lighting circuits. One 2” R.S.C. shall be provided as a spare. J. Lighting Equipment Lighting equipment shall be as described herein. Each lighting unit shall be complete as described with luminaire, standard or supports, auxiliaries, internal wiring, mounted accessories, etc. All equipment shall be UL labeled. Luminaries shall be of weather proof construction. LED lamps shall be in accordance to detail plate no. 5240 and operable to -20 degrees F. All internal parts of luminaire shall be readily accessible. Lighting standards shall be as individually described hereinafter. Concrete shall be Mix No. 3G52 and shall cure 28 days before placing lighting equipment. Anchor bolt assemblies shall be provided by the lighting standard manufacturer. K. Lighting Unit Roadway lighting unit including foundation, standard and luminaire. 1. Foundation - Shall be constructed of 3G52 concrete as per MnDOT specifications and shall include anchor rods and anchor rod bolt pattern as per pole manufacturer’s 295 27 recommendations or as modified per base detail as indicated on the drawings. Anchor rods shall be furnished by the pole manufacturer; anchor bolt assemblies shall be high strength steel with top 12” galvanized after threading, galvanized break-away couplings and galvanized double nuts. Each foundation shall include three non-metallic conduit (N.M.C.) stubouts. The stubouts shall be 2” N.M.C. for feeders and one 3/4” N.M.C. for grounding conductor. L. Residential Street Lighting Street lighting in residential areas shall conform to Xcel/Minnesota Valley Electric Group V rating. Street light fixtures shall be the Xcel/Minnesota Valley Electric Traditional, Acorn, or an approved equal style. 4.09 FENCE RESTORATION (2557) Removal and relocation or restoration of any fences disturbed shall be in accordance with the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications and considered incidental to the cost of the project unless otherwise specified. 4.10 PAVEMENT MARKINGS A. Applications shall be in accordance with MnDOT specifications and the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and as supplemented or modified by Chanhassen Detail Plates. A portion of the MnDOT requirements are as follows: 1. At the time of applying the marking material, the application area shall be free of contamination. The Contractor shall clean the roadway surface prior to the line application in a manner and to the extent required by the Engineer. 2. Glass beads shall be applied immediately after application of the paint line. 3. Pavement markings shall only be applied in seasonable weather when the air temperature is 50 degrees F or higher, and shall not be applied when the wind or other conditions cause a film of dust to be deposited on the pavement surface after cleaning and before the marking material can be applied. 4. The filling of tanks, pouring of materials or cleaning of equipment shall not be performed on unprotected pavement surfaces unless adequate provisions are made to prevent spillage of the material. 5. No striping operations will be permitted between sundown and sunrise without written permission from the Engineer. 6. All material shall be placed in a workmanlike manner, which shall result in a clearly defined line that has been adequately reflectorized with glass beads. 296 28 7. All pavement striping shall be 4 inches wide unless designated otherwise on the plans, and skip lines shall be in lengths of 10 feet separated by gaps of 40 feet. All pavement striping shall be a minimum of 15 mils thick (wet thickness). 8. Glass beads shall be uniformly applied at a rate of 6 pounds per gallon. 9. A reduction in pay shall be made for reduced thickness and/or width. Width shall be computed by random measuring. Thickness shall be computed by the following formula: Thickness = Gallons x 231 Length x Width 10. Application for the marking material shall be such as to provide uniform film thickness throughout the coverage area. Stripe ends shall be cleaned out and square, with a minimum of material beyond the cutoff. 11. Maintenance of traffic during pavement marking operations. B. The contractor shall furnish and place, without extra compensation, all necessary warning and direction signs to maintain traffic during all pavement marking operations, and shall provide such protection to the uncured markings as may be necessary until traffic may cross them without any damage thereto. Traffic control during the striping operation shall be safe and satisfactory to the Engineer or all marking operations shall cease until traffic control meets with the Engineer's approval. Traffic control requirements may include, but are not limited to, furnishing a pilot car and/or flagpersons. Traffic shall be allowed to keep moving at all times, and the striping equipment shall be operated in such a manner that will not force traffic to cross uncured markings. Protection devices such as "cones shall be of an approved typed that will not cause damage to the vehicle when accidentally struck. C. Payment for pavement markings shall be paid for at the contract unit price per linear foot or as otherwise specified. 4.11 STREET SIGNS AND POSTS A. Signs and installation shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and as supplemented or modified by Chanhassen Detail Plates. 1. Residential Street Sign Post: 297 29 a) Posts are to be of a modified channel design with two ribs along the back of each post as well as each toe. b) Post shall be fabricated from high-strength billet steel with minimum yield strength of 80,000 PSI and minimum tensile strength of 100,000 PSI. c) Post installation shall be composed of two 7-foot lengths. The upper section shall weigh 3 lbs/ft and the lower section shall weigh 3 lbs/ft before punching. The posts shall be punched with continuous 3/8-inch diameter holes on 1-inch centers for the entire length of the post. The first hole shall be 1 inch from the top. d) The posts shall be hot dip galvanized to ASTM-A123. Bracket: 12” flat blade, heavy-duty bracket assembly part nos. BA8A12 & BA90F12 or approved equal by the engineer. Signs: White lettering on dark brown background – Double-faced, DG3 Hi- intensity on .08 aluminum. White E-450 border (white around bolt). E-450 size radius corner, punch and notch for E-450. First letter of each word upper case with bottom justification. See chart below for lettering sizes. Nine inch (9") by 36” or 42” wide plates used. B. Private streets signs shall be the same as above, except lettering to be white on blue background. *On local two-lane streets with speed limits of 25 mph or less, 4-inch initial upper-case letters with 3-inch lower-case letters may be used. C. Supplementary lettering to indicate the types of streets (such as Street, Avenue, or Road) or the section of the city (such as NW) on the D3-1 and D3-1a signs may be in smaller lettering, composed of initial upper-case letters at least 3 inches in height and lower-case letters at least 2.25 inches in height. 4.12 PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF VEGETATION (2572) This work consists of protecting and preserving vegetation from damage and taking corrective action when damage occurs. Vegetation includes but is not limited to trees, brush, roots, woody vines, and perennial forbs and grasses. All work done shall conform to Section 2572 of the current MnDOT Standard Specifications. Initial Upper-Case Lower Case Overhead All Types All Speed Limits 12 inches 9 inches Post-Mounted Multi-lane More than 40 mph 8 inches 6 inches Post-Mounted Multi-lane 40 mph or less 6 inches 4.5 inc hes Post-Mounted 2-lane All Speed Limits 6 inches* 4.5 inches* Recommended Minimum Letter Height Type of Mounting Type of Street or Highway Speed Limit 298 30 4.13 EROSION CONTROL (2573) The Contractor shall be solely responsible for the installation, maintenance and removal of all sediment and erosion control measures within the project areas. The Contractor shall install fabric fences, culverts, check dams, sediment traps, erosion control blanket, hydroseed, etc. and all other such appropriate procedures as may be required to prevent sedimentation or erosion as noted on the plans or as directed by the Engineer. Upon completion of the project and restoration of all disturbed areas, the City will authorize the removal of all sediment and erosion control measures. The contractor shall remove and dispose of the erosion and sediment control measures. The BMPs shown on the plans are the minimum requirements for the anticipated site conditions. As construction progresses and unexpected or seasonal conditions dictate, the contractor shall anticipate that more BMPs will be necessary to ensure erosion and sediment control on the site. BMPs must be adjusted accordingly as to not cause flooding on roadway that would impede traffic flow. During the course of construction it is the responsibility of the contractor to address any new conditions that may be created by construction activities and/or climatic events and to provide additional BMPs over and above the minimum requirements shown on the plans that may be needed to provide effective protection of soil and water resources. 4.14 TURF ESTABLISHMENT (2575) All turf establishment shall be in accordance with Section 2575 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specification and the current MnDOT Seeding Manual, except as modified or altered below. The BMPs shown on the plans are the minimum requirements for the anticipated site conditions. As construction progresses and unexpected or seasonal conditions dictate, the contractor shall anticipate that more BMPs will be necessary to ensure erosion and sediment control on the site. During the course of construction it is the responsibility of the contractor to address any new conditions that may be created by construction activities and/or climatic events and to provide additional BMPs over and above the minimum requirements shown on the plans that may be needed to provide effective protection of soil and water resources. A. Sodding 1. The Contractor shall furnish and install sod and topsoil to the areas designated by the engineer. 2. The sod shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Specification 3878. 3. The Contractor shall use a sod cutter to make a straight line cut at full sod widths to match existing areas. Waste material shall then be removed and the area prepared to allow a depth of six inches (6") for topsoil placement. 299 31 4. The topsoil shall not be placed until the Engineer has inspected the area and approved the subgrade preparation and topsoil materials. 5. The topsoil fine grading shall not be completed more than 24 hours prior to the sod laying operation. The contractor shall be required to remove topsoil placed on unapproved areas or topsoil which does not meet MnDOT Specification No. 3877 with such removal being done at the contractor's expense. 6. The Contractor shall not dump the topsoil on the street unless specifically approved by the engineer in the field. Topsoil dumped on the street shall not be allowed to remain overnight unless proper safety flashers are installed and approved by the Engineer in the field. 7. At all times during grading, preparation and sod laying, it shall be the Contractor's responsibility to see that all catch basins in the working area are kept clean. Gutters shall be cleaned and free of dirt and other materials at the end of each working day to ensure proper drainage. 8. Starter fertilizer, with a 1:2:1 ratio, shall be applied to all sod areas at the rate of one half (0.5) pound Nitrogen per 1,000 square feet. 9. A follow-up application of fertilizer consisting of one (1) pound Nitrogen per 1,000 square feet is required 3-4 weeks after the initial application. 10. Watering of the sod shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. B. Seeding 1. Site Preparation a) Verify that areas to receive seeding are free of stones larger than 1½ inches in diameter, weeds, debris and other extraneous material. The surface shall also be free of tire ruts, rills and low spots where “bird baths” may form. b) Verify that grades are within acceptable tolerances of required finished grade and that drainage will be per design. c) Site shall have received six inches (6”) of topsoil. Import may be required. d) Apply water to areas to be seeded as necessary to bring soil to optimum soil moisture content for planting. 2. Seeding shall not be done until the Engineer has inspected the area and approved the subgrade preparation and topsoil materials. 300 32 3. The Contractor shall furnish and install seed and six inches (6") of topsoil to the areas designated by the Engineer. Imported topsoil may be required. 4. Unless otherwise noted, all measurement of seed shall be in pure live seed (PLS). The following State seed mixtures and rate of application shall be used per the plan: a) 25-151 at 120 PLS lbs./acre.; b) 25-141 at 59 PLS lbs./acre.; c) 34-262 at 145 PLS lbs./acre.,; d) 32-241 at 38 PLS lbs./acre. 5. The seeding shall not be done until the Engineer has inspected the area and approved the subgrade preparation and topsoil materials. 6. In the absence of soil analysis, a starter fertilizer, with a 1:2:1 ratio, shall be applied to all seeded areas at the rate of one half (0.5) pound Nitrogen per 1,000 square feet. 7. A follow-up application of fertilizer consisting of one (1) pound Nitrogen per 1,000 square feet is required 3-4 weeks after the initial application. 8. If so directed by the Engineer, the Contractor shall reseed, at his/her cost, any area on which the original seed has failed to grow. 9. Seed shall be broadcasted prior to applying mulch or other stabilization material. 10. Hydro-seeding must use a hydro-seeder capable of continuous agitation action to uniformly distribute the seed at the adjusted bulk application rate of each mixture. Add 50 pounds of Type Hydraulic Mulch per 3884, “Hydraulic Erosion Control Products,” as a tracer for each 500 gallons of water in the hydro-seeder tank. Use flood type nozzles and manufacture’s recommended water volume. Once the seed has been added to the tank mixture a one-hour time limit is set for spreading the mixture on the soil. Once the one hour is passed the excess mixture must be discarded. 11. Hydraulic Mulch (Type 4) shall be applied in accordance with Section 2575.3 and the requirements of Section 3884 of the current Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specification. Areas to be mulched shall be as shown on the plans or as directed by the Engineer in the field. 301 33 a) Mechanically spread mulch to provide a uniform distribution over all exposed soil at the application rate to provide 90 percent uniform soil coverage. If non- uniform distribution occurs, remulch areas or remove the excess coverage. b) Equipment shall have a built in agitation system sufficient to agitate, suspend and homogenously mix the slurry. c) Apply Type 4 mulch as a dual operation with the Type 3 mulch blown on the soil surface at 1 ½ tons per acre and immediately over-spray with stabilized fiber matrix per 3884, “Hydraulic Erosion Control Products,” at 750 pounds per acre. 12. Rapid stabilization method 3 shall be used on all slopes greater than 10% and on all slopes with a positive gradient toward all impaired waters that are not to be sodded. 13. Seeding shall not be done in excessively windy conditions (greater than 15 mph) or when soil is overly wet or frozen. 14. Hydro-seeding shall be performed separate from placing hydraulic erosion control products (hydro-mulch). C. Maintenance and Establishment 1. During seeding applications care shall be taken to avoid overspray onto fences, walls, other structures, other plant material, other planting areas and paved areas. The contractor shall be responsible for washing the overspray from these areas. 2. The contractor shall request that the planted areas be inspected within 24 hours of completion. 3. The work includes a grass-establishment period of 30 calendar days commencing immediately after completion and acceptance of initial stabilization. 4. If, during the establishment period, areas are lacking sufficient sod growth or seeding to assure adequate stands of acceptable vegetation, such areas shall be re-cultivated and re- sodded/reseeded within 48 hours of notification from the Engineer. 5. The establishment period, in this case, shall be continued until the work meets the specified requirements. 6. The establishment period shall include continuous operation of watering, weeding, mowing, fertilizing, spraying, insect and pest control and any other normal operation required to assure proper growth. 7. Only Rodeo™, C-2, 4-D and Accord™ shall be used within 50 feet of streams, wetlands and ponds. D. Topsoil 302 34 Topsoil used for sodding and seeding areas must comply with City Ordinance Sec. 19- 145:(a)2.e. and shall be encompassed in a Topsoil Management Plan in accordance with 2016 Carver County Water Resource Management Ordinance and BMP Guidelines including Section 153.60 of Carver County, MN Code of Ordinances. This specification can be viewed on the following website: https://www.co.carver.mn.us/home/showdocument?id=7483. E. Street Sweeping The Contractor shall sweep the streets following the completion of the sodding and seeding operations. All sweeping shall be completed within two (2) calendar days after completion of the sodding and seeding operation. This sweeping shall be with a pick-up power sweeper and shall continue until all loose material is completely cleaned up to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Also, all catch basins shall be cleaned within the same time requirements stated above. F. Basis of Payment 1. Sodding. The contract price bid for the sod shall include the cost of furnishing and installing 6 inches of topsoil under the sod. 2. Water (sod). The cost shall be considered incidental to the project. 3. Roadside seeding. The contract price bid for the roadside seeding shall include the cost of furnishing and installing 6 inches of topsoil over the area to be seeded. 4.15 GEOTEXTILE STABILIZATION FABRIC Geotextile fabric shall be used where shown on the plans, and shall be MnDOT Type 5, Amoco 2002 or Mirifi 500X or approved equivalent. The fabric shall be overlapped a minimum of two feet (2'). The fabric in extremely bad soil conditions may need to be sewed together as directed by the engineer, and shall be paid for at an agreed upon hourly rate. Payment for the fabric shall be in square yards in place, and excluding overlap. 4.16 SEGMENTED MASONRY RETAINING WALL UNITS (2411) A. Part A (Dry Cast) 1. Scope This specification covers segmental masonry units for use in the construction of mortarless walls. Locations and wall heights shall be as shown on the plans and/or as directed in the field by the Engineer. 303 35 2. Requirements General Each wall that exceeds four (4) feet in exposed height shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer of the State of Minnesota. Design shall be submitted to the Engineer for review. In addition, the Contractor shall submit the following for all wall design: a) Manufacturer’s literature: materials description and installation instructions. b) Shop drawings: Retaining wall system design including wall heights, reinforcement and drainage provisions approved by a registered professional engineer. c) Color sample for selection by owner. d) A one (1) foot square piece of geotextile reinforcing as required by the Engineer. Materials Each manufacturing facility shall provide the Engineer with a copy of their quality control plan and procedures, including testing rates and material sources. Each manufacturing facility shall also supply test reports and documentation to verify compliance with this specification. The units shall conform to ASTM C1372, except that: a) The minimum compressive strength requirements shall be 38 Mpa (5500 psi) for any individual unit and 40Mpa (5800 psi) for the average of 3 units. b) The freeze/thaw durability of wall units tested in accordance with ASTM C 1262 in a 3% saline solution shall be the minimum of the following: (1) The weight loss of each of five test specimens at the conclusion of 90 cycles shall not exceed 1% of its initial weight; or: (2) The weight loss of 4 out of 5 test specimens at the conclusion of 100 cycles shall not exceed 1.5% of its initial weight, with the maximum allowable weight loss for the 5th specimen to not exceed 10%. 304 36 (3) The freeze/thaw durability of cap units test tested in accordance with ASTM C 1262 in a 3% saline solution shall be the minimum of the following: (i) The weight loss of each of 5 test specimens at the conclusion of 40 cycles shall not exceed 1% of its initial weight; or: (ii) The weight loss of 4 out of 5 test specimens at the conclusion of 50 cycles shall not exceed 1.5% of its initial weight, with the maximum allowable weight loss for the 5th specimen to not exceed 10%. (4) Cap units must meet the requirements of (a) and (c) and have a top surface sloped at minimum of 1 mm fall per 10 mm run (1 inch fall per 10 inches run) front to back or be crowned at the center. (5) ASTM C 1262 test results shall be recorded and reported in 10 cycle intervals. Note: It is the intention of this testing that 100% of the wall units and cap units meet the weight loss requirements for (2i) and (3i) respectively, or the a minimum of 80% of the wall units and cap units tested meet the weight loss requirements for (2ii) and (3ii) respectively. If a manufacturer chooses to increase the sample size tested beyond the 5 units required for each block type, these percentages will still apply to the sample size chosen (i.e. if a sample size of 7 blocks is tested a minimum of 6 must meet the weight loss requirement of (2ii) and (3ii), if a sample size of 10 blocks is tested a minimum of 8 must meet the weight loss requirement). 3. Sampling and Testing Shall conform to ASTM C 140, except that: Section 6.2.4 shall be selected and replaced with: “The specimens shall be coupons cut from a finished side or back shell of each unit and sawn to remove any face shell projections. The coupon size shall have a height to thickness ratio of 2 to 1 before capping and a length to thickness ratio of 4 to 1. The coupon shall be cut from the unit such that the coupon height dimensions are in the same direction as the unit height dimension. Compressive testing of full size units will not be permitted. The compressive strength of the coupon shall be assumed to represent the net area compressive strength of the whole unit”. Cap units and wall units shall be sampled and tested as separate block types. Each manufacturing facility is required to sample and test each block type at the rate of one set of samples per 5000 units of continuous production or fraction thereof (if production is interrupted) as part of their overall quality control testing. Each 5000 units of continuous production (or fraction thereof) shall constitute a lot. 305 37 Example: If 12,000 wall units are produced in a continuous production run, this would constitute 3 lots and 3 sets of samples would be required. If 6000 units are produced in each of two production runs (12,000 total) then 2 sets of samples would be required from each separate production run or lot (4 sets of samples total). Minimum manufacturing testing shall include a minimum of 5 randomly selected units from each lot and the following testing on each set of samples: a) Compressive strength (average of 3 units) b) Freeze-thaw durability (average of 5 units) Test results from each lot of production shall be provided to the Engineer within 30 days of the completion of testing and prior to the incorporation of any material into a project. The test report will clearly state the production lot number represented by the test results. This lot number shall correspond with the lot number supplied with the block on the certificate of compliance as outlined in section 4 below. 4. Acceptance and Use All block manufacturers complying with the requirements of Sections 1, 2 and 3 above shall submit test results supporting this compliance to the Engineer. An approved products list on file in the MnDOT Foundations Unit and can be viewed on the MnDOT website at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/materials/foundations.html. Block types and manufacturing facilities not on this list shall not be allowed for use. All block submitted for use on MnDOT or Federal-Aid projects shall be accompanied by a certificate of compliance attached to each pallet of block (MnDOT specification 1603). The certificate of compliance shall include the name and address of the manufacturing facility, date of manufacture and lot number, in addition to all other required information. 5. Method of Measure Measurement will be made by the square foot for the area of the wall face above and below finished grade furnished and installed as specified. 6. Basis of Payment Payment will be made under unit (Modular Block Retaining Wall). Payment will include all labor and materials required to completely construct the wall including, but not limited to, backfill, drainage system components, geo-grid (as required), stain, sealer and aggregate base material. Common Excavation for the wall will be paid under a separate line item. 306 38 4.17 MINOR CONCRETE STRUCTURES B. Part B (Wet Cast) 1. Description This work shall consist of the construction of a modular block retaining wall where shown on the plans. Locations and wall heights shall be as shown on the Plans and/or directed in the field by the Engineer. Wall design shall include aggregate foundation, drainage rock, geo-grid tiebacks (as required), subdrainage system, staining, sealant and all other materials necessary to construct the wall. a) Concrete · Concrete shall be 3F52 (Mn/DOT Certified Mix) and have a minimum 29 day compressive strength requirement of 4,000 psi for any individual load bearing unit. · Concrete blocks shall be wet cast and shall be 6% air entrained by volume. · Blocks shall be a minimum of 16” high, 48” wide and 24” deep. · Exterior face pattern shall be limestone textured rockface as approved equal. Apply per manufacturer’s recommendations. b) Sealant After construction of the wall, apply TK-290 sealant as manufactured by TK products Minnetonka, MN 800-441-2129 or approved equal. Apply per manufacturer’s recommendations. c) Staining Wall face shall be stained to wall manufactures recommendations after sealant is applied. 2. Construction Requirements a) General The wall system shall be constructed in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations upon review of the design methodology by the Engineer. b) Manufacturer Modular Block Retaining Wall shall be RECON Wall Systems Inc. (952-922- 0027) or approved equal. c) Submittals Each wall that exceeds two (2) feet in exposed height shall be designed and certified by a registered professional Engineer of the State of Minnesota. Design shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. In addition, the Contractor shall submit the following for all wall design: 307 39 (1) Manufacturer’s Literature: Materials description and installation instructions. (2) Shop Drawings: Retaining wall system design including wall heights, reinforcement, and drainage provisions approved by a Registered Professional Engineer. (3) Color sample for selection by Owner. (4) A one (1) foot square piece of geotextile fabric reinforcing as required by the Engineer. d) Delivery, Storage and Handling Contractor shall check the materials upon delivery to assure that proper materials have been received and then protect the materials from damage. Contractor shall prevent excessive mud, wet cement, epoxy and like materials, which may affix to the materials, from coming in contact with the materials. No damaged materials may be used on the project. e) Footing Construction Shall be as recommended by the manufacturer. Over excavated areas shall be filled with select granular backfill material and compacted to 95% standard proctor density. Base material shall be compacted so as to provide a level hard surface on which to place the first course of units. Compaction shall be with mechanical plate compactors with density obtained by the Ordinary Compaction Method. f) Wall Construction First course of block shall be placed on the prepared base and then checked for level, alignment, and full contact with the base. Units shall be placed end to end for the full length of the wall alignment. The alignment shall be set by using a string line or offset from a base line. g) Backfill and Compaction Shall be in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations and commence immediately after placement of the first course. 3. Method of Measure Measurement will be made by the square foot for the area of the wall face above and below finished grade furnished and installed as specified. 4. Basis of Payment Payment will be made under the unit price (Modular Block Retaining Wall). Payment will include all labor and materials required to completely construct the wall including, but not limited to, backfill, drainage system components, geo-grid (as required), stain, sealer and aggregate base material. Common Excavation for the wall will be paid under a separate line item. 308 40 4.18 SEGMENTAL MASONRY RETAINING WALL SURFACE SEALING C. Part C (Surface Sealing) 1. All segmental masonry retaining walls shall have their surfaces sealed. Segmental masonry retaining wall surface sealing shall consist of preparation, furnishing and applying the surface sealer to the top, exposed front face, and backside of the upper three courses of all walls. Surface sealers shall meet requirements on file in the MnDOT Concrete Engineering Unit. The list may also be viewed on the MnDOT website at: www.dot.state.mn.us/products/concrete/index.html. Due to the potentially hazardous ingredients contained in sealer formulations extreme care must be exercised in their handling and use, and the manufacturer’s recommendations shall be closely followed. 2. Construction Requirements a) The Contractor shall comply with the manufacturer’s written instructions for preparing, handling and applying the surface sealer. b) The surface to be treated shall receive a light-blast to the extent that the surface is clean and free of oils. c) Before the surface sealer is applied the surface to be sealed shall be dry and free of all dust, debris and frost. d) Surface sealers shall be applied at the heaviest applications rate specified by the manufacturer. All materials and work performed as specified above will be incidental to the construction of the wall. 4.19 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS Pedestrian curb ramps shall be constructed in accordance with MnDOT Standard Plate No. 5- 297.250. Detectable warnings shall be Neenah R-4984 or approved equal by the Engineer. 309 310 311 312 313 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. NO. DATE REVISIONS DESIGNED: DRAWN: CHECKED: DATE: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. REV COMMENTS DATE OF 59414 3/20/2023 GB EH EH 3/11/2023 23-04 MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT TYPICAL SECTIONS 01 02 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) SPWEA340C. ADJUST THICKNESS TO PROVIDE 2% CROSS SLOPE 1.5" DEPTH MILL OF BITUMINOUS EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - DEPTH VARIES EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE - DEPTH VARIES EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5") TYPICAL SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) PLANS INTENDED TO BE PRINTED IN COLOR EXISTING SECTION MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5") SECTION PAVED SECTION EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES TOP OF SUBGRADE TOP OF SUBGRADE TOP OF SUBGRADE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT EXISTING CURBING VARIES, PROTECT (EITHER BITUMINOUS CURBING OR NONE) EXISTING CURBING VARIES, PROTECT NOTES: 1.ROADWAY CROSS SLOPES SHALL ACCOUNT FOR ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AND MAY VARY IN EACH AREA. ANY ADDITIONAL BITUMINOUS TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IN ROADWAY WILL BE PAID FOR RESPECTIVELY FOR EACH MIX TYPE PER TON. EXISTING CURBING VARIES, PROTECT 2.0 % (TYP)2.0 % (TYP) TACK COAT (INCIDENTAL) 314 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. NO. DATE REVISIONS DESIGNED: DRAWN: CHECKED: DATE: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. REV COMMENTS DATE OF 59414 3/20/2023 GB EH EH 3/11/2023 23-04 MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT TYPICAL SECTIONS 02 02 FULL DEPTH MILL OF BITUMINOUS TO TOP OF EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE. EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - DEPTH VARIES EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE - DEPTH VARIES EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (FULL DEPTH) TYPICAL SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) PLANS INTENDED TO BE PRINTED IN COLOR EXISTING SECTION MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (FULL DEPTH*) SECTION EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES TOP OF SUBGRADE TOP OF SUBGRADE EXISTING CURBING VARIES, PROTECT (EITHER BITUMINOUS CURBING OR NONE) EXISTING CURBING VARIES, PROTECT 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) SPWEA340C. ADJUST THICKNESS TO PROVIDE 2% CROSS SLOPE 1.5" TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) SPNWB330C PAVED SECTION 2.0 % (TYP) EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES EXISTING TOPSOIL DEPTH VARIES TOP OF SUBGRADE 2.0 % (TYP) EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE - DEPTH VARIES SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE (INCIDENTAL) NOTES: 1.PRIOR TO PLACING NON WEAR COURSE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A TEST OR PROOF ROLL WITH THE ENGINEER TO DETERMINE IF ANY SOFT SPOTS REQUIRE SOIL CORRECTIONS (INCIDENTAL). 2.AFTER MILLING, PROOF ROLLING, AND ALL NECESSARY CORRECTIONS ARE COMPLETE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROOF ROLL AGAIN WITH THE ENGINEER TO DETERMINE IF ANY SOFT SPOTS REMAIN AND REQUIRE ADDITIONAL CORRECTIONS. ONCE APPROVED, SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT THE AGGREGATE BASE (INCIDENTAL). 3.ROADWAY CROSS SLOPES SHALL ACCOUNT FOR ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AND MAY VARY IN EACH AREA. ANY ADDITIONAL BITUMINOUS TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IN ROADWAY WILL BE PAID FOR RESPECTIVELY FOR EACH MIX TYPE PER TON. 4.TURF ESTABLISHMENT AND ALL RESTORATION OF DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY'S STREET SPECIFICATIONS. EXISTING CURBING VARIES, PROTECT TACK COAT (INCIDENTAL) DETAIL 1 SOIL CORRECTION SECTION AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) 1.5" TYPE SP NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) PLACE AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (CV) MATCH EXISTING PLACE 6" STABILIZING AGGREGATE 3"-0 (CV) OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER TOP OF SUBGRADE *CORES AVERAGE 3.3 INCHES IN SUNRIDGE COURT AND 3.5 INCHES IN OAKSIDE CIRCLE. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 315 American Engineering Testing 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55114-1804 TeamAET.com • 800.972.6364 Geotechnical ● Materials Forensic ● Environmental Building Technology Petrography/Chemistry REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL & PAVEMENT EXPLORATION 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) Projects Chanhassen, Minnesota AET Project No. P-0018335 Date: January 27, 2023 Prepared for: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 DRAFT316 550 Cleveland Avenue North | Saint Paul, MN 55114 Phone (651) 659-9001 | (800) 972-6364 | Fax (651) 659-1379 | TeamAET.com | AA/EEO This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from American Engineering Testing, Inc. January 27, 2023 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: Matt Petite, Construction Manager mpetite@chanhassenmn.gov RE: Report of Geotechnical and Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects City Project No.: 23-01 and 23-04 Chanhassen, Minnesota AET Report No. P-0018335 Dear Mr. Petite: American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) is pleased to present the results of our subsurface and pavement exploration program and geotechnical engineering review for the City of Chanhassen’s 2023 pavement improvements project in Chanhassen, Minnesota. These services were performed according to our proposal to you dated November 17, 2022. We are submitting electronic copies of the report to you. Paper copies of the report can be sent to you upon request. Please contact me if you have any questions about the report. I can also be contacted for arranging construction observation and testing services during the earthwork phase. Sincerely, American Engineering Testing, Inc. Krystle R. Staker, GIT (MN) Geologist I Project Manager kstaker@teamAET.com (586) 850-9717 DRAFT317 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 SIGNATURE PAGE Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Chanhassen American Engineering Testing, Inc. 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 550 Cleveland Avenue North Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 (651) 659-9001/www.teamAET.com Attn: Matt Petite, Construction Manager mpetite@chanhassenmn.gov Authored by: Reviewed by: Krystle R. Staker, GIT (MN) Jacob O. Michalowski, PE Geologist I Senior Engineer I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under Minnesota Statute Section 326.02 to 326.15 Name: ________________________________ Date: ________________ License #: DRAFT318 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TRANSMITTAL LETTER .......................................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................... ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ..................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION ................................................................................................ 1 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING ............................................................... 3 4.1 Field Exploration Program ........................................................................................................ 3 4.2 Laboratory Testing ................................................................................................................... 4 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................... 4 5.1 Surface Observations ............................................................................................................... 4 5.2 Pavement Thickness ................................................................................................................ 4 5.3 Subsurface Soils/Geology ........................................................................................................ 5 5.4 Groundwater ............................................................................................................................ 6 5.5 Review of Soil Properties ......................................................................................................... 6 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................... 7 6.1 Definitions and References ...................................................................................................... 7 6.2 Discussion................................................................................................................................ 7 6.3 Pavement Section Thickness Requirements ............................................................................ 8 6.4 Subgrade Preparation .............................................................................................................. 9 6.5 Compaction .............................................................................................................................. 9 6.6 Aggregate Base ..................................................................................................................... 10 6.7 Bituminous Mixes ................................................................................................................... 10 6.8 Pavement Section Evaluation ................................................................................................ 11 6.9 Pavement Maintenance.......................................................................................................... 14 7.0 UTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 14 7.1 Utility Installation Discussion .................................................................................................. 14 7.2 Utility Support ......................................................................................................................... 14 7.3 Backfill and Compaction ......................................................................................................... 15 8.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................... 15 8.1 Potential Difficulties ................................................................................................................ 15 DRAFT319 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page iii 8.2 Observation and Testing ........................................................................................................ 16 9.0 TEST STANDARDS ........................................................................................................ 16 10.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................ 16 STANDARD SHEETS Definitions Relating to Pavement Construction Bituminous Pavement Subgrade Preparation and Design Bituminous Overlay Milling and Preparation FIGURES Figures 1 through 10 – Pavement Core and Soil Boring Locations APPENDIX A – Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes Unified Soil Classification System AASHTO Soil Classification System Subsurface Boring Logs Pavement Core Logs Material Test Reports Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thicknesses Table Summary of Results and Recommendations APPENDIX B – Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use DRAFT320 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 1 of 16 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of Chanhassen (City) is planning pavement improvements throughout several neighborhood areas throughout Chanhassen, Minnesota. To assist planning and design, you have authorized American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) to conduct a subsurface exploration program at the site, conduct soil laboratory testing, and perform a geotechnical and pavement engineering review for the project. This report presents the results of the above services and provides our engineering recommendations based on this data. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES AET's services were performed according to our proposal to you dated November 17, 2022, and the Professional Services Agreement between AET and the City of Chanhassen that was executed on December 1, 2022. The authorized scope consists of the following. •62 flight auger soil borings to a depth of 5 feet below the pavement surface •112 bituminous pavement cores •Soil laboratory testing •Geotechnical engineering review based on the data and preparation of this report These services are intended for geotechnical purposes only. The scope is not intended to explore for the presence or extent of environmental contamination in the soil or groundwater. 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION We understand that the City’s 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23- 04) projects include the rehabilitation of various residential roadway segments. City Project #23-01 includes proposed rehabilitation methods of full depth reclamation, mill and overlay, spot soil corrections or reconstruction, spot curb and gutter replacement, ADA improvements, stormwater management spot repairs, and sanitary sewer and watermain spot repairs. The roadways included in this project scope were constructed in the late 1980s through the early 2000s. These areas have not undergone any major rehabilitation since their original construction; only maintenance improvements such as crack seals, chip seals, and pothole patching. The neighborhood areas included within this project scope are outlined below.DRAFT321 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 2 of 16 Neighborhood Roadway Start End Curry Farm, Creek Run Trail, and Mulberry Circle Creek Run Trl Yosemite Ave Cul-de-sac Charing Bend Lake Lucy Rd Cul-de-sac Mulberry Cir Lake Lucy Rd (W) Lake Lucy Rd (E) Arlington Ct Lake Lucy Rd Cul-de-sac Heather Ct Mulberry Cir Cul-de-sac Ashton Ct Teton Ln Cul-de-sac Teton Ln Ashton Ct Cul-de-sac Bretton Way Teton Ln Devonshire Dr Stratton Ct Devonshire Dr Cul-de-sac Devonshire Dr Lake Lucy Rd Powers Blvd Weasley Ct Devonshire Dr Cul-de-sac Saddlebrook Area Butte Ct Powers Blvd Cul-de-sac Saddlebrook Trl Powers Blvd Saddlebrook Curve Cactus Curve Saddlebrook Trl (N) Saddlebrook Trl (E) Saddlebrook Pass Saddlebrook Trl Kerber Blvd Trotters Cir Saddlebrook Pass Cul-de-sac Saddlebrook Curve Powers Blvd Kerber Blvd Canyon Curve Saddlebrook Curve (W) Saddlebrook Curve (E) Mission Hills Area Mission Hills Ln Great Plains Blvd 86th St W Mission Hills Cir Mission Hills Ln Cul-de-sac Mission Hills Ct Mission Hills Ln Cul-de-sac Lake Susan Hills Area Heron Drive Audubon Rd Flamingo Dr Swan Ct Heron Dr Cul-de-sac Bittern Ct Heron Dr Cul-de-sac Osprey Ln Heron Dr Audubon Rd Bluebill Trl Osprey Ln (N) Osprey Ln (S) Spoonbill Cir Bluebill Trl Cul-de-sac Alisa Ln Osprey Ln End Alisa Ct Osprey Ln Cul-de-sac City Project #23-04 includes proposed rehabilitation methods of mill and overlay, spot soil corrections, spot curb and gutter replacements, and ADA improvements on approximately 1.4 center line miles. These areas have not undergone any major rehabilitation since their original construction; only maintenance improvements such as crack seals, chip seals, and pothole patching. The neighborhood areas included within this project scope are outlined below. DRAFT322 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 3 of 16 Neighborhood Roadway Start End Sunridge Court Neighborhood Sunridge Ct Audubon Rd Cul-de-sac Oakside Circle Neighborhood Oakside Cir Powers Blvd Cul-de-sac Bramble Drive Neighborhood Bramble Dr Great Plains Blvd Delphinium Ln Raspberry Hill Bramble Dr Cul-de-sac Delphinium Ln Cul-de-sac (connected to Bramble Dr) End Creekwood Drive Neighborhood Creekwood Dr ~150' W of Mandan Circle ~350' W of Great Plains Blvd Ches Mar Drive Neighborhood Ches Mar Dr Hazeltine Blvd End Current AADT volumes for the roadways included in the project scopes were not available at the time of this report. Low traffic volumes of less than 400 ADT and between 400 and 1,000 ADT were assumed for pavement design, as these roadways generally service residential neighborhood traffic. The above stated information represents our understanding of the proposed construction. This information is an integral part of our engineering review. It is important that you contact us if there are changes from that described so that we can evaluate whether modifications to our recommendations are appropriate. 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING 4.1 Field Exploration Program The subsurface exploration program conducted for the project consisted of 62 flight auger soil borings and 112 bituminous pavement cores. The pavement cores were performed December 2, 5-7, 2022 and January 26, 2023. The flight auger soil borings were performed January 12, 13, 16, and 18-20, 2023. The City determined the quantity, approximate locations, and depths of the soil borings and pavement cores. The soil borings logs, pavement core logs, and details of the methods used appear in Appendix A. The soil boring logs contain information concerning soil layering, soil classification, geologic origins, and moisture condition. The pavement core logs contain photographs, measurements (including measurable pavement lifts), condition, and sampling location information. The soil boring and pavement core locations are shown on Figures 1-10 in Appendix A. The borings were located by AET personnel in the field. The locations and elevations at the sampled locations were determined by AET GPS equipment. The collected data has an DRAFT323 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 4 of 16 estimated accuracy of plus or minus ⅓-foot in the horizontal direction and plus or minus ½-foot in the vertical direction. 4.2 Laboratory Testing The laboratory test program included visual/manual classification of the soil samples according to the Unified Soils Classification System and the AASHTO classification system, water content, sieve analysis, and sieve-hydrometer tests. The moisture content and material finer than the #200 sieve are reported on the soil boring logs in Appendix A, adjacent to the samples they were performed on. The complete sieve analysis results are presented on the material test reports following the soil boring logs. 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS The site conditions encountered and discussed in the following sections are based on the soil conditions at the specific pavement core and/or soil boring location. Conditions may vary along the roadway segments between pavement core and soil boring locations; therefore, we recommend that site conditions are monitored during construction. 5.1 Surface Observations The pavement surface condition was observed and noted at the time of pavement coring and drilling operations. Snow and ice were present on the surface at the time of testing; however, the surface condition was noted where visible. The major pavement distresses observed throughout the areas and neighborhoods include varying degrees of severity of longitudinal and transverse cracking, fatigue cracking, delamination of chip seal, deterioration of pavement in areas with fatigue cracking, and weathering. Several maintenance repairs were observed, including patching, the use of crack sealant, and the application of chip seal and fog seal. 5.2 Pavement Thickness AET performed 112, four-inch diameter pavement cores (C-01 TO C-112) and 62 flight auger soil borings (B-01 to B-62). Bituminous pavement was encountered at each of the pavement core and soil boring locations. Crushed limestone base was encountered directly beneath the bituminous pavement at each soil boring location, except at soil boring locations B-01, B-03, B- 05, B-10, B-50, and B-51. At these soil boring locations, silty sand with varying amounts of gravel were encountered directly beneath the bituminous pavement. Sieve analysis tests were performed on the recovered base material from each soil boring DRAFT324 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 5 of 16 location, and each classified as AASHTO designation A-1-a or A-1-b, which is typical of an aggregate base. However, the minus #200 content was generally higher than the typical MnDOT Aggregate Base material gradation specification. The base material encountered at boring locations B-23 and B-28 meets MnDOT Class 5 specifications. Therefore, we refer to the base throughout this report as ‘possible aggregate base’ or simply ‘base’. We refer to the soil boring logs and sieve analysis test reports included in Appendix A for more detailed information regarding the base. A table of the encountered bituminous pavement thickness at each pavement core location and the base thickness at each soil boring location is included in Appendix A. 5.3 Subsurface Soils/Geology The subsurface soils and geology encountered at the soil boring locations are generally described in the following sections. Refer to the subsurface boring logs attached in Appendix A for specific information. Soil borings were not performed in the Sunridge Court, Oakside Circle, or Creekwood Drive Neighborhoods. 5.3.1 Curry Farm, Creek Run Trail, and Mulberry Circle Area The underlying soils below the possible aggregate base in this area consisted of predominantly fill at each boring location in this area. The fill soils encountered were classified as silty sand with a little gravel (A-2-4), sand with silt and varying amounts of gravel (A-1-b, A-3), clayey sand with a little gravel (A-6), sandy lean clay with a little gravel (A-6), and a mixture of silty sand and clayey sand (A-2-6). Coarse alluvium soils were encountered at B-7 that consisted of sand with silt (A-3). 5.3.2 Saddlebrook Area The underlying soils below the possible aggregate base in this area consisted of fill at each boring location in this area. The fill soils encountered were classified as clayey sand with a little gravel (A-6) and sandy lean clay with a little gravel (A-6). 5.3.3 Mission Hills Area The underlying soils below the possible aggregate base in this area consisted of fill at each boring location in this area. The fill soils encountered were classified as silty sand with a little gravel (A-1-b), sand with silt and varying amounts of gravel (A-1-b, A-3), clayey sand with a little gravel (A-6), and sandy lean clay with a little gravel (A-6). DRAFT325 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 6 of 16 5.3.4 Lake Susan Hills Area The underlying soils below the possible aggregate base in this area consisted of fill at each boring location in this area. The fill soils encountered were classified as silty sand with varying amounts of gravel (A-1-b, A-2-4), clayey sand with a little gravel (A-6), and sandy lean clay with a little gravel (A-6). 5.3.5 Bramble Drive Neighborhood At the time of this draft report, the soil boring in the Bramble Drive Neighborhood has not yet been performed. 5.3.6 Ches Mar Drive Neighborhood At the time of this draft report, the soil borings in the Ches Mar Drive Neighborhood have not yet been performed. 5.4 Groundwater The borings were observed for the presence of groundwater during drilling and upon reaching the planned termination depths. Groundwater was not observed in any of the boring locations within the sampled depths. Groundwater levels stabilize relatively quickly in the sandy soils encountered throughout the project areas. However, groundwater can take hours to days to stabilize in the silty and clayey soils that were predominately encountered throughout the project areas. Therefore, the measured groundwater depth and lack of measured groundwater may not be indicative of the hydrostatic groundwater level at the site. Additionally, groundwater levels fluctuate due to varying seasonal and annual rainfall and snow melt amounts, as well as other factors. 5.5 Review of Soil Properties High strength/stability is needed from the upper portion of the subgrade to resist yielding from wheel loads. Although load intensity dissipates with depth, the more critical portion requiring high strength for wheel load resistance is normally considered the upper three feet of the subgrade (defined as the critical subgrade zone in this report). The subgrade soils encountered within the critical subgrade zone were predominately silty sand (A-2-4) and sandy lean clay (A-6) soils, which can become unstable with construction traffic when wet. We judge these soils to have moderate strength characteristics, are moderately slow draining, and have moderately high frost susceptibility. Sandy (A-3, A-1-b) fill soils were also encountered throughout the project site, primarily through the Mission Hills DRAFT326 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 7 of 16 Area, and these soils are judged to have moderately high strength characteristics, are moderately draining, and have moderate frost susceptibility. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Definitions and References This report references the 2020 MnDOT Standard Specifications for Construction (MnDOT Spec.) and the City’s “Typical Residential Street Section, Plate No. 5200”. This report also references the attached standard sheets entitled “Definitions Relating to Pavement Construction”, “Bituminous Pavement Subgrade Preparation and Design” and “Bituminous Overlay Milling and Preparation.” The ensuing sections reference the following words, which are defined below: Critical Subgrade Zone is within three feet (vertically) of the top of subgrade elevation. Grading grade is the bottom of the aggregate base layer. Granular Material should meet the requirements of MnDOT Specification 3149, including Table 3149.2-1, which requires 0% to 20% for the ratio of the percent passing the No. 200 sieve and 1-inch sieve. Select Grading Material is mineral soil, excluding organic soils (>5% organic material by weight), silt (soil containing 80 percent or more silt-sized particles), and marl (soil consisting of clay and lime or unconsolidated sedimentary rock). Select Granular Material should meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec Table 3149.2-1, which requires 0% and 12% for the ratio of the percent passing the No. 200 sieve/1-inch sieve. Top of Subgrade is the surface of material immediately beneath a granular material layer meeting MnDOT Spec. 3149, which is usually placed as a sand subbase layer. If there is no granular material layer, then the top of subgrade is the grading grade. 6.2 Discussion We understand the City is considering full depth reclamation (FDR), mill-and-overlay, or resurfacing for the roadways included in the Curry Farm, Creek Run Trail, and Mulberry Circle Area; Saddlebrook Area; Mission Hills Area; and the Lake Susan Hills Area. Spot soil DRAFT327 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 8 of 16 corrections or reconstruction, as well as utility spot repairs including storm water management, sanitary sewer, and watermain are also proposed for these areas. The City is primarily considering mill-and-overlay or resurfacing for the roadways included in the Sunridge Court Neighborhood, Oakside Circle Neighborhood, Bramble Drive Neighborhood, Creekwood Drive Neighborhood, and the Ches Mar Drive Neighborhood. Spot soil corrections are also proposed throughout these neighborhoods. There are no utility spot repairs proposed. Based upon our review of the existing pavement and subgrade conditions, we have included recommendations for full depth reclamation, mill-and-overlay, and resurfacing in the following sections. 6.3 Pavement Section Thickness Requirements Current AADT volumes for the roadways included in the project scope were not available. These roadways generally service residential traffic; therefore, traffic volumes of less than 400 ADT and between 400 and 1000 ADT were assumed for pavement design. To evaluate pavement designs for each roadway, MnDOT’s “Flexible Pavement Design Using Soil Factors” chart for a 7-ton design with the assumed traffic volume was utilized. The limiting on-site subgrade soils encountered throughout each area and neighborhood were the clayey sand and sandy lean clay (A-6) soils. Based on these limiting soils, the recommended soil factor is 100 with an assumed R-value of 12. For a 7-ton roadway with less than 400 ADT, the minimum required bituminous granular equivalent (GE) is 7 and the total minimum required GE is 11.5. For a 7-ton roadway with between 400 and 1000 ADT, the minimum required bituminous granular equivalent (GE) is 7 and the total minimum required GE is 15. We understand the City’s standard typical pavement section consists of 4 inches of bituminous pavement and this has been incorporated into the recommended full depth reclamation pavement sections. The total GE calculated for roadway segments suitable for a full depth reclamation approach are included in the Table of Results and Recommendations in Appendix A. The total GE presented in this table does not include any remaining base after the reclamation process is complete due to the base material generally not meeting MnDOT specifications for Class 5 material. The total GE for roadway segments suitable for a mill-and-overlay are not calculated due to variations in the bituminous conditions and thicknesses; rather a range of extended life is DRAFT328 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 9 of 16 presented in Section 6.8.2 of this report. 6.4 Subgrade Preparation In areas where soil corrections are needed and the existing subgrade is exposed, we recommend the removal of existing pavements and other deleterious materials from within the critical subgrade zone (within 3 feet of top of subgrade). Exposed subgrade soils should be prepared per MnDOT Spec. 2112, Subgrade Preparation to a depth of at least 6 inches below the bottom of the subcut. The final subgrade should have proper stability within the critical subgrade zone. For the clayey and silty soils found at this site, the subgrade stability should be evaluated prior to sand subbase placement using the test roll procedure described in MnDOT Spec. 2111. Instability will likely be the result of wetter subgrade soils. If unstable soils are found under the test roll, these soils should be improved by means of scarification, drying, and recompaction, or by subcutting and replacement. The final soils which remain in place within the critical subgrade zone should be capable of passing a test roll prior to placing the sand subbase. If organic (A-8), fat clays (A-7-6), or silty clays (A-4) soils are found to be present during subgrade preparation, we recommend removing these soils where present within the critical subgrade zone. Where cohesionless soils are exposed (i.e., sands to silty sands), we recommend applying surface compaction. This compaction should take place with a self-propelled vibratory roller compactor having a drum diameter of at least 3 feet. Overall stability should be evaluated during the compaction process (judged by an AET geotechnical/pavement engineer or their representative). Instability will likely be a result of wetter clayey/silty soils beneath the exposed sandy soils. Again, the unstable soils should be improved by means of scarification, drying, and recompaction; or by subcutting and replacement. 6.5 Compaction All new fill and reworked soils for pavement support should be placed and compacted per MnDOT Spec. 2106, including the moisture content and compaction requirements shown in MnDOT Tables 2106.3-1 and 2106.3-4, respectively. DRAFT329 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 10 of 16 In ASTM terms, this specification requires soils placed within 3 feet of grading grade be compacted to a minimum of 100% of the standard maximum dry unit weight defined in ASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor test). A reduced minimum compaction level of 95% of the standard maximum dry unit weight can be used below the critical subgrade zone for non-granular materials (those which do not meet MnDOT Spec 3149.2B). 6.6 Aggregate Base Aggregate base placed for pavement support should meet the gradation and quality requirements for Class 5 or 6 per MnDOT Spec. 3138. Any millings or reclaimed material placed as aggregate base should meet the gradation requirements of MnDOT Table 3138.2-6. Aggregate base placement and compaction should be performed according to MnDOT Spec. 2211. All aggregate base material (including existing, imported, or reclaimed) should be tested for compaction using the Penetration Index Method per the requirements of Table 2211.3-3. 6.7 Bituminous Mixes The bituminous mixtures should meet the most current MnDOT Spec. 2360 (Plant-Mixed Asphalt Pavement) requirements. Compaction of all bituminous mixtures should be by the “Maximum Density Method.” We recommend the use of bituminous mix SPWEA330C for the upper lift and the lower lift of pavement. However, we understand that the Standard City Detail Plate No. 5200 specifies the use of SPWEA340C for the upper lift and SPNWB330C for the lower lift of pavement. These bituminous mixes are suitable for use in the FDR and resurfacing pavement sections. Use of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) in the bituminous mix is a cost saving measure that is often suggested. If used, we recommend a maximum of 20% RAP with the mixes presented previously; however, there will be a higher probability of pavement thermal cracking when RAP is used. In addition, we recommend limiting RAP within the upper wear course to a maximum of 10% to reduce cracking. If bituminous mixes are utilized other than those recommended, a lower percentage of RAP may be needed. The bituminous pavement mixtures and placement should follow the City’s standard specification which references MnDOT Spec. 2360. An “A” or “B” gradation could be interchanged for each lift. An “A” gradation generally provides a “finer” pavement surface. DRAFT330 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 11 of 16 6.8 Pavement Section Evaluation Our recommended pavement sections are presented in the following subsections and are based on the assumed traffic information, the subsurface conditions, and existing pavement conditions. A full depth reclamation approach will typically have a higher initial cost than a mill-and-overlay approach, however the FDR approach provides an increased service life of the pavement, up to 20 years or more with maintenance. An FDR pavement section breaks up all of the cracking within the pavement layers so the new section will not experience reflective cracking like a mill- and-overlay approach will, the aggregate base layer is improved, and the extended life of the pavement is relatively greater. A mill-and-overlay is generally less expensive than an FDR approach, however the life expectancy of the pavement is also the shorter. Mill-and-overlays are dependent on the remaining bituminous condition and existing subsurface, which vary the life expectancy and pose greater potential risks if the existing bituminous condition and existing subsurface conditions are poor. We have summarized the data collected and the proposed rehabilitation approach for each roadway segment in the table titled Table of Results and Recommendations included in Appendix A. 6.8.1 Full Depth Reclamation Full depth reclamation (FDR) involves crushing both the bituminous and a portion of the in- place aggregate base layer, blending the material with the intent of creating a recycled aggregate base. A portion of this material is then removed to control grade before placement of new bituminous surfacing. This process requires that appropriate material types and thicknesses be in-place. This approach will remove the existing pavement distresses. While the possible aggregate base material encountered beneath the bituminous pavement generally does not meet MnDOT Specification 3138.2-3 (Class 5), the incorporation of the bituminous during the FDR process should help improve the quality of the material. Due to the anticipated low traffic volumes and spring load limit, it is in our opinion an FDR approach would be suitable for the roadway segments identified in the “Table of Results and Recommendations” included in Appendix A. DRAFT331 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 12 of 16 This table presents the recommended reclaim depth for each roadway segment. The reclaim depth presented is the maximum depth suitable; however, the reclaim depth may need to be adjusted based on existing site conditions to reduce the risk of fully penetrating the base layer into the fine-grained subgrade soils. Care should be taken during construction to ensure that underlying subgrade soils are not incorporated into the FDR material. This may require a thinner reclaim in some areas, however the total reclaim depth should be kept as close to the maximum reclaim depth as possible. This should be monitored during construction. Significantly reducing the reclaim depth for the entire roadway segment will negatively impact the total GE. We recommend the Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) be conducted in accordance with the applicable subsections of MnDOT Spec. 2215 Reclamation. We recommend the reclaimed FDR material and bituminous millings placed on the roadway as aggregate base meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 3138. The FDR approach will generally provide 18+ years of life to the pavement, provided proper maintenance is performed over that time span. 6.8.2 Mill-and-Overlay A mill-and-overlay approach removes the upper portion of the existing bituminous, but leaves the lower portion in place; hence, improvements to the base and subgrade layers are not possible. This approach requires a sufficient bituminous layer such that enough bituminous remains to prevent the paving equipment from breaking through into the base layer. This remaining bituminous thickness is typically considered to be at least 1½ inches; however, the required thickness also depends on the bituminous condition, as stripped or severely deteriorated bituminous pavement is not suitable. With the mill-and-overlay approach, cracks from the existing pavement will reappear in the new surface layer after a short time (reflective cracking). This approach would only be beneficial for select roadway segments included in the project scope. These roadway segments have sufficient bituminous thickness, and the pavement cores were generally solid or exhibited low to medium severity stripping. The remaining roadway segments have either insufficient bituminous thickness, exhibited severe stripping throughout one or more of the pavement cores obtained from that segment, exhibited medium to high severity stripping in the lower lift(s) of the pavement core, or combination of all. If a mill-and-overlay approach were utilized on these roadways, there is a risk that significant preparation work after milling could be required or should be planned for in DRAFT332 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 13 of 16 design. With this approach, the recommended mill-and-overlay depths are included in the “Table of Results and Recommendations” in Appendix A. We recommend using bituminous mix SPWEA340B. The extended life of the pavement will vary based upon the existing condition and on the amount of pre-overlay crack repair and post-overlay maintenance, which may be in the range of 6 to 12 years. The milled surface should be prepared according to MnDOT Spec. 2231 Bituminous Surface Reconditioning prior to the overlay. 6.8.3 Resurfacing Resurfacing allows a new bituminous layer to be placed with minimal improvements to the base aggregate. In terms of extending pavement service life and cost, this approach is between an FDR approach and a mill-and-overlay approach. However, with a resurfacing approach, there is a risk of encountering soft areas during construction that may result in extra costs to repair that were not planned for. A full depth reclamation approach is preferred over resurfacing due to the variable and higher minus #200 contents of the base material encountered. Resurfacing removes the existing bituminous pavement and leaves the existing aggregate base in place. After the bituminous pavement has been removed by milling, only surficial improvement to the base layer is possible. This option is appropriate to relatively thin bituminous pavements or to bituminous pavements in poor condition with sufficient aggregate base in good condition, such as is generally present at these sites; however, the gradation of the base material indicates that minus #200 content is high relative to typical aggregate bases. Resurfacing also requires an adequate and consistent thickness of the existing aggregate base layer, as well as a strong subgrade, such that the aggregate base layer can be improved by conditioning and recompacting. It may be necessary to add additional aggregate base on some roadway segments to maintain the existing grade of the roadway after the pavement has been milled. We recommend that the placement of additional aggregate base, conditioning, and recompacting of the aggregate base layer pass a test roll procedure before the placement of new bituminous pavement. A resurfacing approach may provide 12 to 18 years of life to the pavement structure, as the aggregate base is not being corrected or improved. DRAFT333 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 14 of 16 6.9 Pavement Maintenance Regardless of the improvement approach selected, all bituminous pavements require on-going maintenance to reach their design life. Even if placed and compacted properly over stable subgrade conditions, bituminous pavements typically experience cracking in 1 to 3 years, primarily due to temperature-related expansion and shrinkage. We recommend that a regularly scheduled maintenance program consisting of patching and sealing of cracks and local distressed areas be implemented. Seal coating of the pavement surface after 3 to 5 years also helps prolong the pavement life. 7.0 UTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS 7.1 Utility Installation Discussion We understand utility spot repairs including storm water management, sanitary sewer, and watermain are proposed for the Curry Farm, Creek Run Trail, and Mulberry Circle Area; Saddlebrook Area; Mission Hills Area; and the Lake Susan Hills Area. Groundwater was not observed at our boring locations. However, if it is encountered during construction, it should be removed from the excavation. Dewatering means and methods are the responsibility of the contractor. 7.2 Utility Support Oversized materials, such as cobbles and boulders, should be removed as needed to reduce point loads on the pipe. Where inorganic mineral soils are properly dewatered and remain undisturbed and stable, we recommend providing a 4- to 6-inch-thick layer of Granular Bedding (MnDOT Spec. 3149.2F) directly beneath the pipe, per the pipe manufacturers recommendations. The bedding should be shaped to conform to the bottom of the pipe to minimize point or imbalanced loads on the pipe and provide uniform pipe support. If unstable soils are encountered and additional sub-cutting is necessary to provide pipe support, the excavation for pipe foundation improvement should be laterally oversized at the bottom a horizontal distance (from the outermost plan viewpoint of the pipe) at least equal to the vertical distance between the lowest bottom elevation of the pipe and the lowest excavation bottom elevation (i.e., 1H:1V lateral oversize). All new fill placed within the excavation below the spring-line should be well compacted sand and/or gravel material. DRAFT334 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 15 of 16 7.3 Backfill and Compaction On-site, inorganic, soils may be suitable for reuse as utility backfill provided they can be properly moisture conditioned and compacted. The fill soils should be free of organic matter, rubble, debris, or gravel larger than 3 inches in the largest dimension. Utility trench backfill soils should match the adjacent subgrade soils when placed within 3 feet of grading grade below paved areas. Utility backfill soils should be placed in lifts thicknesses appropriate to the compaction equipment being used and the soil being compacted. The compactor should be capable of compacting the entire lift thickness to the recommended compaction level. We recommend trench backfill placed within 3 feet of grading grade be compacted to a minimum of 100% of the Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) maximum dry unit weight. The remaining utility trench backfill below the upper 3 feet can have a minimum compaction level of 95% of the Standard Proctor maximum dry unit weight. 8.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 8.1 Potential Difficulties 8.1.1 Runoff Water in Excavation Water can be expected to collect in the excavation bottom during times of inclement weather or snow melt. To allow observation of the excavation bottom, to reduce the potential for soil disturbance, and to facilitate filling operations, we recommend water be removed from within the excavation during construction. Based on the soils encountered, we anticipate the groundwater can be handled with conventional sump pumping. 8.1.2 Wet or Dry Soils The on-site materials may be wetter or drier of the “optimum” condition, making proper compaction of those materials difficult unless they are mechanically moisture conditioned to near the standard optimum water content. 8.1.3 Disturbance of Soils The on-site soils can be disturbed under construction traffic, especially if the soils are wet. If soils become disturbed, they should be subcut to the underlying undisturbed soils. The subcut soils can then be dried and recompacted back into place, or they should be removed and replaced with drier imported fill. DRAFT335 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Page 16 of 16 8.1.4 Cobbles and Boulders The soils at this site can include cobbles and boulders. This may make excavating procedures somewhat more difficult than normal if they are encountered. 8.2 Observation and Testing The recommendations in this report are based on the subsurface conditions found at our test pavement core and soil boring locations. The existing pavement thicknesses and soil conditions along the roadways can be expected to vary away from the pavement core and soil boring locations. We recommend on-site observation by a geotechnical engineer/technician during construction to evaluate these potential changes. Materials testing should also be performed to document that project specifications have been satisfied. 9.0 TEST STANDARDS When we refer to an ASTM Standard in this report, we mean that our services were performed in general accordance with that standard. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. 10.0 LIMITATIONS Within the limitations of scope, budget, and schedule, we have endeavored to provide our services according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices at this time and location. Other than this, no warranty, express or implied, is intended. Important information regarding risk management and proper use of this report is given in Appendix B entitled “Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use.” DRAFT336 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Standard Sheets Definitions Relating to Pavement Construction Bituminous Pavement Subgrade Preparation and Design Bituminous Overlay Milling and Preparation DRAFT337 01REP019 (07/20) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. DEFINITIONS RELATING TO PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION Top of subgrade: Grade which contacts the bottom of the aggregate base layer. Sand subbase: Uniform thickness sand layer placed as the top of subgrade which is intended to improve the frost and drainage characteristics of the pavement system by increasing drainage of excess water in the aggregate base and subbase, by reducing and “bridging” frost heaving, and by reducing spring thaw weakening effects. Critical subgrade zone: The subgrade portion beneath and within three vertical feet of the top of subgrade. A sand subbase, if placed, would be considered the upper portion of the critical subgrade zone. Suitable Grading Material: Mineral soil materials, typically from the project site, excluding the following: 1) soils which have an organic content exceeding 3%, 2) cohesive soils having a Liquid Limit exceeding 50%, 3) soils which include debris, cobbles, and/or boulders, and 4) soils which are not acceptable from an environmental standpoint. The soil must also be capable of attaining the specified compaction level at its current water content or at a water content that can be reasonably scarified, blended, and moisture conditioned to a uniform water content in order to uniformly meet compaction requirements. Granular Material: Soils meeting MnDOT Specification 3149.2B.1. This refers to granular soils which, of the portion passing the 1" sieve, contain less than 20% by weight passing the #200 sieve. Select Granular Material: Soils meeting MnDOT Specification 3149.2B.2. This refers to granular soils which, of the portion passing the 1" sieve, contain less than 12% by weight passing the #200 sieve. Select Granular Material (Super Sand): Soils meeting MnDOT Specification 3149.2B.3. This material is cleaner and coarser than Select Granular Material (see specification for specific requirements). Compaction Subcut: Construction of a uniform thickness subcut below a designated grade to provide uniformity and compaction within the subcut zone. Replacement fill can be the materials subcut, although the reused soils should be blended to a uniform soil condition, moisture conditioned as needed to meet MnDOT Specification 2105.F; and re-compacted per the Specified Density Method defined in MnDOT Specification 2105.3F.1. Test Roll: A means of evaluating the near-surface stability of subgrade soils (usually non-granular). Suitability is determined by the depth of rutting or deflection caused by passage of heavy rubber-tired construction equipment, such as a loaded dump truck, over the test area. Yielding of less than 1" is normally considered acceptable, although engineering judgment may be applied depending on the equipment used, soil conditions present, and/or depth below final grade. Unstable Soils: Subgrade soils which do not pass a test roll. Unstable soils typically have water content exceeding the standard optimum water content defined in ASTM:D698 (Standard Proctor test). Organic Soils: Soils which have sufficient organic content such that the soils engineering properties are negatively affected (typically more than 3% organic content). These soils are usually black to dark brown in color. DRAFT338 01REP016 (12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND DESIGN GENERAL Bituminous pavements are considered layered “flexible” systems. Dynamic wheel loads transmit high local stresses through the bituminous/base onto the subgrade. Because of this, the upper portion of the subgrade requires high strength/stability to reduce deflection and fatigue of the bituminous/base system. Th e wheel load intensity dissipates through the subgrade such that the high level of soil stability is usually not needed below about 2 feet to 4 feet (depending on the anticipated traffic and underlying soil conditions). This is the primary reason for speci fying a higher level of compaction within the upper subgrade zone versus the lower portion. Moderate compaction is usually desired below the upper critical zone, primarily to avoid settlements/sags of the roadway. However, if the soils present below the upper 3 feet subgrade zone are unstable, attempts to properly compact the upper 3 feet zone to the 100% level may be difficult or not possible. Therefore, control of moisture just below the 3 feet level may be needed to provide a non-yielding base upon which to compact the upper subgrade soils. Long-term pavement performance is dependent on the soil subgrade drainage and frost characteristics. Poor to moderate draining soils tend to be susceptible to frost heave and subsequent weakening upon thaw. This condition can result in irregular frost movements and “pop-outs,” as well as an accelerated softening of the subgrade. Frost problems become more pronounced when the subgrade is layered with soils of varying permeability. In this situation, the free-draining soils provide a pathway and reservoir for water infiltration which exaggerates the movements. The placement of a well-drained sand subbase layer as the top of subgrade can minimize trapped water, smooth frost movements and significantly reduce subgrade softening. In wet, layered and/or poor drainage situations, the long-term performance gain should be significant. If a sand subbase is placed, we recommend it be a “Select Granular Borrow” which meets Mn/DOT Specification 3149.2B2. PREPARATION Subgrade preparation should include stripping surficial vegetation and organic soils; where the exposed soils are within the upper “critical” subgrade zone (generally 2 feet deep for “auto only” areas and 3 feet deep for “heavy duty” areas), they should be evaluated for stability. Excavation equipment may make such areas obvious due to deflection and rutting patterns. Final evaluation of soils within the critical subgrade zone should be done by test rolling with heavy rubber-tired construction equipment, such as a loaded dump truck. Soils which rut or deflect 1" or more under the test roll should be corrected by either subcutting or replacement; or by scarification, drying, and recompaction. Reworked soils and new fill should be compacted per the “Specified Density Method” outlined in Mn/DOT Specification 2105.3F1 (a minimum of 100% of Standard Proctor density in the upper 3 feet subgrade zone, and a minimum of 95% below this). Subgrade preparation scheduling can be an important consideration. Fall and Spring seasons usually have unfavorable weather for soil drying. Stabilizing non-sand subgrades during these seasons may be difficult, and attempts often result in compromising the pavement quality. Where construction scheduling requires subgrade preparation during these times, the use of a sand subbase becomes even more beneficial for constructability reasons. SUBGRADE DRAINAGE If a sand subbase layer is used, it should be provided with a means of subsurface drainage to prevent water build-up. This can be in the form of draintile lines which dispose into storm sewer systems, or outlets into ditches. Where sand subbase layers include sufficient sloping and water can migrate to lower areas, draintile lines can be limited to finger drains at the catch basins. Even if a sand layer is not placed, strategically placed draintile lines can aid in improving pavement performance. This would be most important in areas where adjacent non-paved areas slope towards the pavement. Perimeter edge drains can aid in intercepting water which may infiltrate below the pavement. DRAFT339 Page 1 of 2 01REP020 (07/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BITUMINOUS OVERLAY MILLING AND PREPARATION COLD MILLING OPERATION Cold milling is generally conducted longitudinally along the pavement profile. The forward speed of the machine, rotational velocity of the rotating drum, spacing of the carbide bits , and grade control of the cutting head should be closely controlled to produce a uniform texture throughout the project. The longitudinal profile should be held as close as practical to the same tolerance as new construction, since the milled profile will have a significant impact upon the ride of the overlaid pavement, especially when only a single lift of overlay is placed. Normally, the recommended milling depth corresponds to the lift thickness of the original pavement. It is best to remove the entire layer as the bottom of the lift is typically where bonding and stripping issues occur. The depth of milling may require adjustment in the field to ensure that a full layer is removed and that portions of a layer are not left bonded to the underl ying surface. Additionally, if there is a large amount of stripping present, the milling depth should be sufficiently deep to remove the stripped areas. This depth is typically determined by coring adjacent to cracks and looking at both the layer thickness and a ny evidence of stripping. The milling depth can be adjusted to remove areas with significant stripping present, or if the stripping is limited only to a few transverse cracks, a smaller milling machine can be brought in the remove additional material in the se areas. Patching can be performed after the milling operation for cases where a minimal amount of stripping is present or in the areas where cracks are milled deeper than the remaining roadway . Please note that the milling depth should also take into consider ation the original pavement depth that will remain after the milling operation. It is likely that the milling machine will break through the underlying pavement if there will be less tha n 1.5 inches of the original pavement remaining, thereby causing probl ems with the milling operation and overlay. PRE-OVERLAY PREPARATION It is recommended that a tack coat is applied between all bituminous layers and prior to placing any bituminous mixtures on the milled surface. The bituminous tack coat material should be applied at a uniform rate of 0.03 to 0.05 gal/yd2 between bituminous layers and 0.07 to 0.10 gal/yd 2 on the milled bituminous surface prior to being overlaid. The application rates are for undiluted emulsions (as supplied from the refinery) or MC and RC liquid asphalts. The asphalt emulsion may be further diluted in the field in accordance with Mn/DOT Spec. 2357. Prior to overlaying, it is recommended that deteriorated cracks and wheel -path areas are air blasted and power swept to remove loose material. Air blasting should be completed with high pressure (minimum of 100 psi) equipment. Removal of material at some deteriorated locations may require the use of a small milling machine or handwork, in addition to the high pressure air blasting. Regardless of the patch depth, it is important to remove the entire existing deteriorated pavement. Depressions resulting after air blasting, sweeping, or milling operations that are greater than 1.5 inches in depth and width should be filled with a Bituminous Patchin g Mixture meeting Mn/DOT Spec. 2231 and compacted with a small vibratory or pneumatic roller. Depressions equal to or less than 1.5 inches in depth and width can be filled with the bituminous wear course mixture. Consideration should be given to allow traffic to drive over deteriorated joints/cracks, after backfilling (if there are a large number of these distressed locations) with the recommended bituminous mixtures and proper compaction , for a period of seven days prior to placement of the wear course m ixture. The proposed seven-day delay period will permit traffic to apply additional compaction to the joint/crack backfill. If further compact ion is not deemed necessary, then patching of depressions greater than 1.5 inches in depth and width can be completed ahead of the paver and compacted with a small vibratory or pneumatic roller. As previously stated, the smaller depressions will be filled in by the wearing course paving operations. If the pavement surface, after milling, is lower than the adjacent sh oulders, the contractor (as directed by the Engineer), should construct outlet trenches and take other measures necessary to provide adequate surface drainage for the milled areas. It is recommended that a notch at least 1 inch deep be milled to allow the placement of 1 inch minimum bituminous wearing course at the ends of transitions. DRAFT340 Page 2 of 2 01REP020 (07/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BITUMINOUS OVERLAY MILLING AND PREPARATION Please note that as this will be a bonded overlay (i.e., bonded to the milled surface), the amount of pre -overlay repair that must be performed on an existing pavement is critical to the performance of the overlay. Similarly, reflection crack control measu res must be applied to these overlays, such as the selection of bituminous mixture and PG binder type . Depending upon the frequency of existing transverse cracks it may be prudent to select a bituminous mixture and PG binder that will crack at the existing frequency but be more resistant to degradation from environmental effects such as moisture. Other considerations include subdrainage, traffic, pavement widening, and shoulders. As a general rule, all the distress types in an existing pavement that are likely to affect the performance of an overlay within a few years should be repaired. The designer should also consi der the tradeoffs between pre-overlay repair and the thickness and type of overlay selected. For instance, if the existing pavement is severely deteriorated, an overlay type that is less sensitive to existing pavement conditions may be more cost effective without extensive pre-overlay repair. BITUMINOUS PLACEMENT The bituminous mixture should meet the most current Mn/DOT Spec. 2360 (Plant -Mixed Asphalt Pavement: Combined 2360/2360 Gyratory/Marshall Design Specification) requirements. Compaction of all bituminous mixt ures should be by the “Maximum Density Method”. DRAFT341 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Figures Figures 1 through 10 – Pavement Core and Soil Boring Locations DRAFT342 Lake Riley ChaskaChaska ChanhassenChanhassen GG62 GG101 GG4 GG17 GG18 GG14 GG39 GG1 GG16 GG113 GG16 GG101 GG101 GG4 GG101 GG101 GG4 GG101 GG101 GG4 £¤212 £¤212 ST5 ST41 ST7 ST41 ST7 ST41 ST41 ST7 ST5 C a r v e r C a r v e rC o u n t y C o u n t y H e n n e p i n H e n n e p i nC o u n t y C o u n t y BluffLake R ileyCreekP urga to ryCreekBluff Creek C h a s k a Creek Bluff C r e e k Ba v a r i a R d Galpin Blvd Flying Cloud D rPowers BlvdEdenPrairieRdMitchellRdVic t o r i a D r 1st Ave EChaska Blvd Bavaria Rd F ly in g C loudD r AET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 10.5 Miles ± File: P-0018335-1.1.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 1Map Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Project Overview - Roadway Segments Legend CP-23-01 CP-23-04 DRAFT343 @? @? @A B-1/C-2 C-3 C-1 W 63rd St Knob Hill LnYosemite AveApple RdDeerRdgKoehnen Cir Audubon CirBlue Jay CirCreekRunTrlStratfordPl Deer RdAET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 250125 Feet ± File: P-0018335-2A.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 2AMap Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Curry Farm, Creek Run Trail, & Mulberry Circle Legend @A Core and Boring Location @?Core Only Location CP-23-01 DRAFT344 @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A B-5/C-9B-4/C-7 B-3/C-5 B-2/C-4 B-9/C-15 B-8/C-13 B-7/C-12 B-6/C-11 B-20/C-34 B-19/C-32 B-18/C-30 B-17/C-27 B-16/C-25 B-15/C-23 B-14/C-21B-13/C-20 B-12/C-19 B-10/C-17 C-8 C-6 C-33 C-31 C-29 C-28 C-26 C-24 C-22 C-16 C-10 Powers BlvdLake Lucy RdYosemite AveDevonshireDrCarver Beach Rd NezPerce Dr Plea s a n t V i ew Rd W 63rd St Mu lb erry Cir Western DrLakewayDr P en amintLnShadow LnChaparral LnPointLakeLucyKnob Hill LnUtica TerTroendle CirPeacefulLnPleasantView C v Lake Lucy AET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 500250 Feet ± File: P-0018335-2B.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 2BMap Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Curry Farm, Creek Run Trail, & Mulberry Circle Legend @A Core and Boring Location @?Core Only Location CP-23-01 B-11/C-18 @A @? @A C-14DRAFT 345 @?@? @? @? @?@? @? @?@? @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @AB-41/C-66 B-40/C-65 B-39/C-64 B-38/C-63 B-37/C-62 B-35/C-58 B-34/C-57 B-33/C-56 B-32/C-55B-31/C-53 B-30/C-51 B-29/C-50 B-28/C-49 B-27/C-47 B-26/C-46 B-25/C-44 B-24/C-41 B-22/C-38B-21/C-36 C-59 C-54 C-52 C-48 C-45 C-43 C-42C-40 C-37C-35 Powe r s B l vd Kerber BlvdS i e r r a TrlSanta V e r a D rChippewa TrlSaratoga DrConesto g a T rlConestoga CtKimberly Ln Lake Ann Park AET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 500250 Feet ± File: P-0018335-3.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 3Map Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Saddlebrook Area Legend @A Core and Boring Location @?Core Only Location CP-23-01 B-23/C-39 @? @? C-67 C-61 @A @?B-36/C-60 DRAFT346 @? @? @? @? @A @A @A @AB-45/C-75 B-44/C-72 B-43/C-70 B-42/C-69C-74 C-73 C-71 C-68 W 86th St MissionHillsLn Ti g u a L n Ma r s h l a n d TrlMission Hills DrM o nkCt Mi s s i o n HillsWayEMission Hil l s W a y W R i c eCtHeartland Ct F r i sco CtBlackbirdCt Lake Susan GG101 GG101 Rice Marsh Lake Park AET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 250125 Feet ± File: P-0018335-4.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 4Map Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Mission Hills Area Legend @A Core and Boring Location @?Core Only Location CP-23-01 Mission Hills CirMission Hills Ct DRAFT347 @? @? @?@? @? @? @? @? @? @? @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @ A @AB-58/C-99 B-57/C-97 B-56/C-96 B-55/C-94 B-54/C-92 B-53/C-91 B-52/C-89 B-50/C-85 B-49/C-84 B-48/C-83 B-47/C-80 B-46/C-77 C-98 C-95 C-93 C-90 C-88 C-86 C-82 C-81 C-79C-78 C-76 Heron Dr Audubon RdOsprey LnFlamingoDrLake Dr WAlisa CtIb is C t BluebillTrlAlisa LnBi tt e r n C t Valley Ridge Trl N SwanCtValleyRidgeTrlS Mallard Ct Power Hill Park AET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 250125 Feet ± File: P-0018335-5.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 5Map Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Lake Susan Hills Area Legend @A Core and Boring Location @?Core Only Location CP-23-01 B-51/C-87 @?DRAFT348 @? @? C-101 C-100 Audubon RdS u nridgeCtValley Rid g e Trl SValleyViewPlValley Ridge Pl GG18Bl u f f L a k e AET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 250125 Feet ± File: P-0018335-6.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 6Map Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Sunridge Court Neighborhood Legend @?Core Only Location CP-23-04 DRAFT349 @? @?C-103 C-102 Powers BlvdLyman Blvd Lyman Blvd Oakside CirGG18 Power Hill Park AET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 250125 Feet ± File: P-0018335-7.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 7Map Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Oakside Circle Neighborhood Legend @?Core Only Location CP-23-04 DRAFT350 @? @? @? @? @AB-59/C-105 C-108 C-107 C-106 C-104 Pioneer Trl G reatPlains B l v d Halla Nursery Dr ERaspberryHlDelphinium LnColumbine TrlHalla Nursery Dr EGG101 Bluff Creek Golf Course AET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 250125 Feet ± File: P-0018335-.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 8Map Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Bramble Drive Neighborhood Legend @A Core and Boring Location @?Core Only Location CP-23-04 Great Plains BlvdB r am b l e D r DRAFT351 @? C-109 GreatPlainsBlvdCreekwood Dr Lako t a L nMandan CirD a yl i l y L n Bl u f f L a k e Bluff Creek Park AET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 250125 Feet ± File: P-0018335-9.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 9Map Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Creekwood Drive Neighborhood Legend @A Core and Boring Location @?Core Only Location CP-23-04 DRAFT352 @A @A @A B-62/C-112 B-61/C-111 B-60/C-110 Hazeltine BlvdChes Mar DrHighover DrChes M a r F a r m R d Hig h o v e r W a y ST41 Lake Minnewashta Regional Park AET Project No. P-0018335 2023 City Pavement Rehab (#23-01) and Mill & Overlay (#23-04) ProjectsChanhassen, MN 0 250125 Feet ± File: P-0018335-10.mxd Date: 01/27/2023 Figure 10Map Reference: Date: 01/27/2023 Ches Mar Drive Neighborhood Legend @A Core and Boring Location @?Core Only Location CP-23-04 DRAFT353 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Appendix A Boring Log Notes Unified Soil Classification System AASHTO Soil Classification System Subsurface Boring Logs Pavement Core Logs Material Test Reports Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thicknesses Table Summary of Results and Recommendations DRAFT354 Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Report No. P-0018335 Appendix A - Page 1 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. A.1 FIELD EXPLORATION The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling and sampling 62 flight auger soil borings and 112 pavement cores. The locations of the borings appear on Figure 1-10, preceding Appendix A in this report. A.2 SAMPLING METHODS A.2.1 Disturbed Samples (DS)/Spin-up Samples (SU) Sample types described as “DS” or “SU” on the boring logs are disturbed samples, which are taken from the flights of the auger. Because the auger disturbs the samples, possible soil layering and contact depths should be considered approximate. A.2.3 Sampling Limitations Unless actually observed in a sample, contacts between soil layers are estimated based on the spacing of samples and the action of drilling tools. Cobbles, boulders, and other large objects generally cannot be recovered from test borings, and they may be present in the ground even if they are not noted on the boring logs. Determining the thickness of “topsoil” layers is usually limited, due to variations in topsoil definition, sample recovery, and other factors. Visual-manual description often relies on color for determination, and transitioning changes can account for significant variation in thickness judgment. Accordingly, the topsoil thickness presented on the logs should not be the sole basis for calculating topsoil stripping depths and volumes. If more accurate information is needed relating to thickness and topsoil quality definition, alternate methods of sample retrieval and testing should be employed. A.3 CLASSIFICATION METHODS Soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are based on the Unified Soil Classification (USC) system. The USC system is described in ASTM: D2487 and D2488. Where laboratory classification tests (sieve analysis or Atterberg Limits) have been performed, accurate classifications per ASTM: D2487 are possible. Otherwise, soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are visual-manual judgments. Charts are attached which provide information on the USC system, the descriptive terminology, and the symbols used on the boring logs. Visual-manual judgment of the AASHTO Soil Group is also noted as a part of the soil description. A chart presenting details of the AASHTO Soil Classification System is also attached. The boring logs include descriptions of apparent geology. The geologic depositional origin of each soil layer is interpreted primarily by observation of the soil samples, which can be limited. Observations of the surrounding topography, vegetation, and development can sometimes aid this judgment. A.4 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS The groundwater level measurements are shown at the bottom of the boring logs. The following information appears under “Water Level Measurements” on the logs: Date and Time of measurement Sampled Depth: lowest depth of soil sampling at the time of measurement Casing Depth: depth to bottom of casing or hollow-stem auger at time of measurement Cave-in Depth: depth at which measuring tape stops in the borehole Water Level: depth in the borehole where free water is encountered Drilling Fluid Level: same as Water Level, except that the liquid in the borehole is drilling fluid The true location of the water table at the boring locations may be different than the water levels measured in the boreholes. This is possible because there are several factors that can affect the water level measurements in the borehole. Some of these factors include: permeability of each soil layer in profile, presence of perched water, amount of time between water level readings, presence of drilling fluid, weather conditions, and use of borehole casing. A.5 LABORATORY TEST METHODS A.5.1 Water Content Tests Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-010, which is performed in general accordance with ASTM: D2216 and AASHTO: T265.DRAFT355 Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Report No. P-0018335 Appendix A - Page 2 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. A.5.2 Sieve Analysis of Soils (thru #200 Sieve) Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-040, which is performed in general conformance with ASTM: D6913, Method A. A.5.3 Particle Size Analysis of Soils (with hydrometer) Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-050, which is performed in general accordance with ASTM: D422 and AASHTO: T88. A.6 TEST STANDARD LIMITATIONS Field and laboratory testing is done in general conformance with the described procedures. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. A.7 SAMPLE STORAGE Unless notified to do otherwise, we routinely retain representative samples of the soils recovered from the borings for a period of 30 days.DRAFT356 01REP052C (7/11) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BORING LOG NOTES DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS TEST SYMBOLS Symbol Definition Symbol Definition AR: Sample of material obtained from cuttings blown out the top of the borehole during air rotary procedure. B, H, N: Size of flush-joint casing CAS: Pipe casing, number indicates nominal diameter in inches COT: Clean-out tube DC: Drive casing; number indicates diameter in inches DM: Drilling mud or bentonite slurry DR: Driller (initials) DS: Disturbed sample from auger flights DP: Direct push drilling; a 2.125 inch OD outer casing with an inner 1½ inch ID plastic tube is driven continuously into the ground. FA: Flight auger; number indicates outside diameter in inches HA: Hand auger; number indicates outside diameter HSA: Hollow stem auger; number indicates inside diameter in inches LG: Field logger (initials) MC: Column used to describe moisture condition of samples and for the ground water level symbols N (BPF): Standard penetration resistance (N-value) in blows per foot (see notes) NQ: NQ wireline core barrel PQ: PQ wireline core barrel RDA: Rotary drilling with compressed air and roller or drag bit. RDF: Rotary drilling with drilling fluid and roller or drag bit REC: In split-spoon (see notes), direct push and thin-walled tube sampling, the recovered length (in inches) of sample. In rock coring, the length of core recovered (expressed as percent of the total core run). Zero indicates no sample recovered. SS: Standard split-spoon sampler (steel; 1.5" is inside diameter; 2" outside diameter); unless indicated otherwise SU Spin-up sample from hollow stem auger TW: Thin-walled tube; number indicates inside diameter in inches WASH: Sample of material obtained by screening returning rotary drilling fluid or by which has collected inside the borehole after “falling” through drilling fluid WH: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod and hammer WR: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod 94mm: 94 millimeter wireline core barrel ▼: Water level directly measured in boring : Estimated water level based solely on sample appearance CONS: One-dimensional consolidation test DEN: Dry density, pcf DST: Direct shear test E: Pressuremeter Modulus, tsf HYD: Hydrometer analysis LL: Liquid Limit, % LP: Pressuremeter Limit Pressure, tsf OC: Organic Content, % PERM: Coefficient of permeability (K) test; F - Field; L - Laboratory PL: Plastic Limit, % qp: Pocket Penetrometer strength, tsf (approximate) qc: Static cone bearing pressure, tsf qu: Unconfined compressive strength, psf R: Electrical Resistivity, ohm-cms RQD: Rock Quality Designation of Rock Core, in percent (aggregate length of core pieces 4" or more in length as a percent of total core run) SA: Sieve analysis TRX: Triaxial compression test VSR: Vane shear strength, remolded (field), psf VSU: Vane shear strength, undisturbed (field), psf WC: Water content, as percent of dry weight %-200: Percent of material finer than #200 sieve STANDARD PENETRATION TEST NOTES (Calibrated Hammer Weight) The standard penetration test consists of driving a split-spoon sampler with a drop hammer (calibrated weight varies to provide N60 values) and counting the number of blows applied in each of three 6" increments of penetration. If the sampler is driven less than 18" (usually in highly resistant material), permitted in ASTM: D1586, the blows for each complete 6" increment and for each partial increment is on the boring log. For partial increments, the number of blows is shown to the nearest 0.1' below the slash. The length of sample recovered, as shown on the “REC” column, may be greater than the distance indicated in the N column. The disparity is because the N-value is recorded below the initial 6" set (unless partial penetration defined in ASTM: D1586 is encountered) whereas the length of sample recovered is for the entire sampler drive (which may even extend more than 18"). DRAFT357 01CLS021 (07/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ASTM Designations: D 2487, D2488 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA Soil Classification Notes ABased on the material passing the 3-in (75-mm) sieve. BIf field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add “with cobbles or boulders, or both” to group name. CGravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay DSands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt SW-SC well-graded sand with clay SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay (D30)2 ECu = D60 /D10, Cc = D10 x D60 FIf soil contains >15% sand, add “with sand” to group name. GIf fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. HIf fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to group name. IIf soil contains >15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name. JIf Atterberg limits plot is hatched area, soil is a CL-ML silty clay. KIf soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200 add “with sand” or “with gravel”, whichever is predominant. LIf soil contains >30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. MIf soil contains >30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. NPl>4 and plots on or above “A” line. OPl<4 or plots below “A” line. PPl plots on or above “A” line. QPl plots below “A” line. RFiber Content description shown below. Group Symbol Group NameB Coarse-Grained Soils More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Gravels More than 50% coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve Clean Gravels Less than 5% finesC Cu>4 and 1<Cc<3E GW Well graded gravelF Cu<4 and/or 1>Cc>3E GP Poorly graded gravelF Gravels with Fines more than 12% fines C Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelF.G.H Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelF.G.H Sands 50% or more of coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve Clean Sands Less than 5% finesD Cu>6 and 1<Cc<3E SW Well-graded sandI Cu<6 and/or 1>Cc>3E SP Poorly-graded sandI Sands with Fines more than 12% fines D Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandG.H.I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandG.H.I Fine-Grained Soils 50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve (see Plasticity Chart below) Silts and Clays Liquid limit less than 50 inorganic PI>7 and plots on or above “A” lineJ CL Lean clayK.L.M PI<4 or plots below “A” lineJ ML SiltK.L.M organic Liquid limit–oven dried <0.75 Liquid limit – not dried OL Organic clayK.L.M.N Organic siltK.L.M.O Silts and Clays Liquid limit 50 or more inorganic PI plots on or above “A” line CH Fat clayK.L.M PI plots below “A” line MH Elastic siltK.L.M organic Liquid limit–oven dried <0.75 Liquid limit – not dried OH Organic clayK.L.M.P Organic siltK.L.M.Q Highly organic soil Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic in odor PT PeatR 3 2 ½1 ¾4 10 20 40 60 140 200 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 81 Sieve NumberScreen Opening (in.) 50 10 5 1.0 0.10.5 PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS SIEVE ANALYSIS PERCENT PASSINGPERCENT RETAINEDD60 = 15mm D30 = 2.5mm D10 = 0.075mm Cu = = = 200D60 D10 15 0.075 Cc = = = 5.6(D30) D10 x D60 2.5 0.075 x 15 2 2 CL-ML For classification of fine-grained soils and fine-grained fraction of coarse-grained soils. Equation of "A"-line Horizontal at PI = 4 to LL = 25.5. then PI = 0.73 (LL-20) Equation of "U"-line Vertical at LL = 16 to PI = 7. then PI = 0.9 (LL-8)"A" LIN E "U" LINECL OR OL CH OR OH 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 16 7 4PLASTICITY INDEX (PI)LIQUID LIMIT (LL) Plasticity Chart ADDITIONAL TERMINOLOGY NOTES USED BY AET FOR SOIL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION Grain Size Term Particle Size Boulders Over 12" Cobbles 3" to 12" Gravel #4 sieve to 3" Sand #200 to #4 sieve Fines (silt & clay) Pass #200 sieve Gravel Percentages Term Percent A Little Gravel 3% - 14% With Gravel 15% - 29% Gravelly 30% - 50% Consistency of Plastic Soils Term N-Value, BPF Very Soft less than 2 Soft 2 - 4 Firm 5 - 8 Stiff 9 - 15 Very Stiff 16 - 30 Hard Greater than 30 Relative Density of Non-Plastic Soils Term N-Value, BPF Very Loose 0 - 4 Loose 5 - 10 Medium Dense 11 - 30 Dense 31 - 50 Very Dense Greater than 50 Moisture/Frost Condition (MC Column) D (Dry): Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to touch. M (Moist): Damp, although free water not visible. Soil may still have a high water content (over “optimum”). W (Wet/ Free water visible, intended to Waterbearing): describe non-plastic soils. Waterbearing usually relates to sands and sand with silt. F (Frozen): Soil frozen Layering Notes Laminations: Layers less than ½" thick of differing material or color. Lenses: Pockets or layers greater than ½" thick of differing material or color. Peat Description Fiber Content Term (Visual Estimate) Fibric Peat: Greater than 67% Hemic Peat: 33 – 67% Sapric Peat: Less than 33% Organic Description (if no lab tests) Soils are described as organic, if soil is not peat and is judged to have sufficient organic fines content to influence the Liquid Limit properties. Slightly organic used for borderline cases. Root Inclusions With roots: Judged to have sufficient quantity of roots to influence the soil properties. Trace roots: Small roots present, but not judged to be in sufficient quantity to significantly affect soil properties. ML OR OL MH OR OH DRAFT358 A-7 A-7-5 A-7-6 Sieve Analysis, Percent passing: No. 10 (2.00 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50 max.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . No. 40 (0.425 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 max.50 max.51 min.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . No. 200 (0.075 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 max.25 max.10 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.36 min.36 min.36 min.36 min. Characteristics of Fraction Passing No. 40 (0.425 mm) Liquid limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min. Plasticity index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .N.P.10 max.10 max.11 min.11 min.10 max.10 max.11 min.11 min. General Ratings as Subgrade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Definitions of Gravel, Sand and Silt-Clay 01CLS022 (07/11)AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. The term "silty" is applied to fine material having plasticity index of 10 or less and the term "clayey" is applied to fine material having plasticity index of 11 or greater. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures GRAVEL - Material passing sieve with 3-in. square openings and retained on the No. 10 sieve. COARSE SAND - Material passing the No. 10 sieve and retained on the No. 40 sieve. FINE SAND - Material passing the No. 40 sieve and retained on the No. 200 sieve. COMBINED SILT AND CLAY - Material passing the No. 200 sieve Excellent to Good Group A-8 soils are organic clays or peat with organic content >5%. BOULDERS (retained on 3-in. sieve) should be excluded from the portion of the sample to which the classificaiton is applied, but the percentage of such material, if any, in the sample should be recorded. (35% or less passing No. 200 sieve)(More than 35% passing No. 200 sieve) General Classification A-4 A-5 The terms "gravel", "coarse sand", "fine sand" and "silt-clay", as determinable from the minimum test data required in this classification arrangement and as used in subsequent word descriptions are defined as follows: Granular Materials Silt-Clay Materials A-1 A-2 A-2-6 A-2-7 . . . . 6 max. Fine Sand Silty or Clayey Gravel and Sand Silty Soils Clayey Soils Plasticity index of A-7-5 subgroup is equal to or less than LL minus 30. Plasticity index of A-7-6 subgroup is greater than LL minus 30. A-3 A-2-4 A-2-5 Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand Fair to Poor A-6 The placing of A-3 before A-2 is necessary in the "left to right elimination process" and does not indicate superiority of A-3 over A-2. Usual Types of Significant Constituent Materials A-1-a A-1-b Group Classification -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 15 35 0 2 4 6 8 1012 1416 18 203040 506070 80 1020304050607080100140180 LIQUID LIMIT PLAS TI CI T Y I N D E X PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVEPARTIAL GROUP INDEXGROUP INDEX CHART Group Index (GI) = (F-35) [0.2+0.005 (LL-40) ] + 0.01 (F-15) (PI-10) where F = % Passing No. 200 sieve, LL = Liquid Limit, and PI = Plasticity Index. When working with A-2-6 and A-2-7 subgroups the Partial Group Index (PGI) is determined from the PI only. When the combined Partial Group Indices are negative, the Group Index should be reported as zero.A-2-6 and A-2-782% Passing No. 200 sieve LL = 38 PI = 21 PGI = 8.9 for LL PGI = 7.4 for PI GI = 16 Then:Example: 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Sub- G r o u p A-7-5 Sub-G roupA-7 -6 A-7A-5 A-4 A-6 PI = LL - 30PLASTICITY INDEX (PI) Liquid Limit and Plasticity Index Ranges for the A-4, A-5, A-6 and A-7 SubgroupsLiquid LimitDRAFT359 FILL3.5" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly gravelly silty sand, brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, gray and brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 19 F F/M 15 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.2 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 9:30 1010.8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.890279 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-01 (p. 1 of 1) -93.560676 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT360 FILL5" Bituminous pavement 31" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen to 3' (A-1-b) FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, brown (A-2-4) FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, dark brown (A-2-4) END OF BORING CORE 17 F M M LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.2 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 9:50 995.9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.884646 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-02 (p. 1 of 1) -93.555265 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT361 FILL3.25" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, gray and brown, frozen to 3.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 20 F F/M 20 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 10:10 987.0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.884129 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-03 (p. 1 of 1) -93.554823 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT362 FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement 25.5" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, gray and brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 22 F F/M 16 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 10:25 991.1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.882259 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-04 (p. 1 of 1) -93.553933 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT363 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, frozen to 3.5', brown (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown and gray (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 18F M 16 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 10:40 993.2 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.882563 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-05 (p. 1 of 1) -93.552515 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT364 FILL4" Bituminous pavement 14" Crushed limestone base, brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, gray, brown and dark brown (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 23F F/M M 16 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.2 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:00 988.2 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.884061 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-06 (p. 1 of 1) -93.551986 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT365 FILL COARSE ALLUVIUM OR FILL 3.25" Bituminous pavement 32.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) SAND WITH SILT, fine to medium grained, light brown, frozen to 3.5' then moist (SP-SM) (A-3) (possible fill) END OF BORING CORE 16 F F/M LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.9 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:20 987.5 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.884668 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-07 (p. 1 of 1) -93.551903 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT366 FILL3.25" Bituminous pavement 20.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, gray and brown, frozen to 3.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 19F F/M 21 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.9 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:35 983.6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.881672 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-08 (p. 1 of 1) -93.553779 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT367 FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement 15.5" Crushed limestone base, brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, gray and brown, frozen to 2' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 20F F/M 17 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:55 1011.3 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.889215 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-09 (p. 1 of 1) -93.554157 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT368 FILL6" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay with gravel, gray and brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 16F F/M 18 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 12:45 1006.9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.888876 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-10 (p. 1 of 1) -93.553734 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT369 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement 14.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 17 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 5.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 12:55 1001.8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.888268 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-11 (p. 1 of 1) -93.553889 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2320 DRAFT370 FILL4" Bituminous pavement 11" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 18 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 1:15 1007.2 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.887857 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-12 (p. 1 of 1) -93.554858 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2323 DRAFT371 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 10.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 19 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 5.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 1:25 1024.1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.888247 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-13 (p. 1 of 1) -93.555524 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2320 DRAFT372 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 12.75" Crushed limestone base, brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, a little gray, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 16 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 5.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 1:40 993.6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.888345 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-14 (p. 1 of 1) -93.552965 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2325 DRAFT373 FILL4.75" Bituminous pavement 13.25" Crushed limestone base, brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 12 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None TA 1/12/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/12/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 1:55 991.5 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.887606 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-15 (p. 1 of 1) -93.552416 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2321 DRAFT374 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement 13.75" Crushed limestone, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, gray and brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 17F F/M 17 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 988.1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.885790 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-16 (p. 1 of 1) -93.553933 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT375 FILL4" Bituminous pavement 9" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-a) FILL, mostly sand with silt, light brown, frozen (A-3) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown and dark brown, frozen to 4' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F F/M 13 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 983.0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.884652 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-17 (p. 1 of 1) -93.553452 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2314 DRAFT376 FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement 15" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sand with silt, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 3.5' (A-3) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M M 13 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.6 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 973.0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.886099 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-18 (p. 1 of 1) -93.551553 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT377 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement 12.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, brown, frozen to 3' (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M M 14 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 5.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 971.9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.886667 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-19 (p. 1 of 1) -93.550596 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT378 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 13.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mixture of silty sand and clayey sand, a little gravel, dark brown, frozen to 3.5' (A-2-6) END OF BORING CORE 16F F/M 9 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 5.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 977.9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.885606 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-20 (p. 1 of 1) -93.551093 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT379 FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement 8.5" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, gray and brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 21F F/M 22 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig:SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 987.4 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.872796 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-21 (p. 1 of 1) -93.547094 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT380 FILL4" Bituminous pavement 12" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown, a little gray, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 17 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 989.8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.872735 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-22 (p. 1 of 1) -93.545205 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2315 DRAFT381 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 13.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-a) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 9F F/M 17 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 994.7 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.871205 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-23 (p. 1 of 1) -93.547163 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT382 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 13.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 19 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig:SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 988.3 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.871663 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-24 (p. 1 of 1) -93.545322 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2318 DRAFT383 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement 14.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, gray and brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 19 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:14 1009.4 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.870691 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-25 (p. 1 of 1) -93.544376 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2316 DRAFT384 FILL3.25" Bituminous pavement 15.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-a) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 12F F/M 19 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:28 1005.0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.869681 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-26 (p. 1 of 1) -93.543862 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT385 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement 8.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 19 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.6 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:47 990.3 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.870905 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-27 (p. 1 of 1) -93.545891 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2311 DRAFT386 FILL4.25" BItuminous pavement 13.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 3.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 21 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 1005.6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.869885 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-28 (p. 1 of 1) -93.545653 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/235 DRAFT387 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 10.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 23 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 1003.2 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.870188 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-29 (p. 1 of 1) -93.544957 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/2312 DRAFT388 FILL3.5" BItuminous pavement 12.5" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE 10F F/M 25 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/13/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/13/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 989.9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.871543 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-30 (p. 1 of 1) -93.543948 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT389 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 8.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 16 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 5.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 8:55 986.8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.872206 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-31 (p. 1 of 1) -93.543121 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT390 FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement 12.5" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 17 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 9:18 980.6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.872488 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-32 (p. 1 of 1) -93.541709 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT391 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement 13.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 21 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 9:40 993.6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.871656 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-33 (p. 1 of 1) -93.542853 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT392 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 12.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 18 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 10:02 1001.5 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.870966 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-34 (p. 1 of 1) -93.542651 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT393 FILL5.75" Bituminous pavement 12.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 22 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.8 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 10:15 1008.8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.868685 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-35 (p. 1 of 1) -93.545878 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT394 FILL5.5" Bituminous pavement 13" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 18 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 10:32 1001.8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.869368 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-36 (p. 1 of 1) -93.544145 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT395 FILL5.25" Bituminous pavement 13.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 23 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 10:54 996.2 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.869465 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-37 (p. 1 of 1) -93.542788 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT396 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement 13.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 19 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:10 1003.7 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.868335 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-38 (p. 1 of 1) -93.545328 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT397 FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement 14" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 21 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 5.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:25 990.9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.867647 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-39 (p. 1 of 1) -93.545548 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT398 FILL5" Bituminous pavement 11.5" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 17 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 5.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:40 987.8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.867352 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-40 (p. 1 of 1) -93.545308 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT399 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 13.5" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/16/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/16/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.8 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 12:15 975.9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.867646 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-41 (p. 1 of 1) -93.543972 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT400 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 12.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sand with silt, a little gravel, light brown, frozen to 3' (A-3) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown to dark gray (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F W 20 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/18/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/18/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.3 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 8:49 903.1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.850386 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-42 (p. 1 of 1) -93.532607 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT401 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 9.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, light brown, frozen to 3' (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown and gray (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M M 16 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/18/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/18/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.4 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 9:00 918.5 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.849684 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-43 (p. 1 of 1) -93.531884 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT402 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement 12.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 3' (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M M 14 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/18/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/18/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 9:15 908.9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.848246 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-44 (p. 1 of 1) -93.531954 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT403 FILL5.75" Bituminous pavement 12.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, light brown, frozen to 3' (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, gray and brown (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M M 23 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/18/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/18/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 8:35 908.4 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.849713 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-45 (p. 1 of 1) -93.533597 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT404 FILL7" Bituminous pavement 15" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 21 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/18/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/18/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.4 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 12:50 943.6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.849760 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-46 (p. 1 of 1) -93.561185 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT405 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 13.75" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, dark grayish brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 18 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/19/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/19/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 12:40 937.1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.850404 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-47 (p. 1 of 1) -93.559078 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT406 FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement 12.5" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 19 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/19/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/19/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.6 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:58 941.4 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.850648 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-48 (p. 1 of 1) -93.561265 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT407 FILL5.5" Bituminous pavement 12.5" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown, a little gray, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 20 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/18/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/18/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 1:21 941.2 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.849411 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-49 (p. 1 of 1) -93.560587 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT408 FILL7.25" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, brown, frozen to 3.5' (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F M LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/20/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/20/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.8 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:55 965.5 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.847578 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-50 (p. 1 of 1) -93.563141 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT409 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 3'' (A-2-4) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, dark gray and brown (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M M 18 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/19/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/19/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 2:00 934.4 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.847675 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-51 (p. 1 of 1) -93.561273 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT410 FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement 14.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown, a little gray, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 19 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/19/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/19/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 5.0 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:20 943.2 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.848218 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-52 (p. 1 of 1) -93.560494 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT411 FILL5.25" Bituminous pavement 10.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 3' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 19 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/18/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/18/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.6 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 2:06 941.8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.849183 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-53 (p. 1 of 1) -93.560085 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT412 FILL4.75" Bituminous pavement 12.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown and gray, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 17 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/19/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/19/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 10:20 938.8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.849473 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-54 (p. 1 of 1) -93.559256 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT413 FILL4" Bituminous pavement 12" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly sandy lean clay, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 2.5' (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M 20 LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/19/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/19/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 10:57 941.1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.848070 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-55 (p. 1 of 1) -93.559155 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT414 FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement 16.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, brown, frozen to 3' (A-2-4) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M M LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/20/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/20/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.6 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 11:07 962.9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.847075 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-56 (p. 1 of 1) -93.562709 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT415 FILL3.25" Bituminous pavement 11.25" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, brown, frozen to 3' (A-1-b) FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, brown (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M M LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/20/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/20/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.5 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 10:07 961.4 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.847669 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-57 (p. 1 of 1) -93.562581 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT416 FILL5" Bituminous pavement 13" Crushed limestone base, light brown, frozen (A-1-b) FILL, clayey sand, a little gravel, brown (A-6) END OF BORING CORE F F/M M LG:91C TIME DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS None SB 1/20/23 6" FA BORINGCOMPLETED: CAVE-INDEPTHCASINGDEPTHSAMPLEDDEPTH 1/20/23 DATE 5.0 NOTE: REFER TO THE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TERMINOLOGY ON THIS LOGRig: 4.7 SG 0-5' DEPTH: DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL WATERLEVEL SURFACE ELEVATION: DR: 8:38 951.4 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLETYPE 1 2 3 4 5 FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS %-#200MC AET JOB NO: PROJECT: RECIN. DEPTHINFEET PLWC LONGITUDE:44.848711 LOG OF BORING NO. GEOLOGY LATITUDE: B-58 (p. 1 of 1) -93.561845 01-DHR-060 LL 03/2011 DENDEN P-0018335 2023 Pavement Rehab and Mill + Overlay Projects; Chanhassen, MN N SUBSURFACE BORING LOG AET_CORP W-LAT-LONG P-0018335.GPJ AET+CPT+WELL.GDT 1/25/23DRAFT417 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Creek Run Trl Lane:EB Core ID:C-01 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.890139 Longitude:-93.560220 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.4 Lift 2 (in):2.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT418 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Creek Run Trl Lane:NB Core ID:C-02 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.890279 Longitude:-93.560676 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 1/2 Lift 1 (in):2.9 Lift 2 (in):1.5 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core. Crack propagating through core from top to bottom.DRAFT419 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Creek Run Trl Lane:WB Core ID:C-03 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.890740 Longitude:-93.560524 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.5 Lift 2 (in):2.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping from 1.5" to bottom of core.DRAFT420 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Charing Bend Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-04 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.884646 Longitude:-93.555265 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 Lift 1 (in):1.3 Lift 2 (in):1.7 Lift 3 (in):1.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT421 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mulberry Cir Lane:NB Core ID:C-05 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.884129 Longitude:-93.554823 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.7 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.7 Lift 2 (in):2.0 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping in upper 1.5" of core. Remaining portion of core is generally solid.DRAFT422 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mulberry Cir Lane:SB Core ID:C-06 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.883206 Longitude:-93.555019 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):1.8 Lift 2 (in):2.3 Condition: Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout. PAVEMENT CORE LOG DRAFT423 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mulberry Cir Lane:WB Core ID:C-07 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.882259 Longitude:-93.553933 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.7 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.9 Lift 2 (in):1.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT424 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mulberry Cir Lane:EB Core ID:C-08 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.881803 Longitude:-93.552432 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.7 Lift 2 (in):1.7 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 2.5". Core generally solid in upper 2.5" of core, low severity stripping in remaining portion of core.DRAFT425 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mulberry Cir Lane:SB Core ID:C-09 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.882563 Longitude:-93.552515 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.7 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.8 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 1.8". Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT426 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mulberry Cir Lane:NB Core ID:C-10 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.883338 Longitude:-93.552085 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):2.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT427 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mulberry Cir Lane:NB Core ID:C-11 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.884061 Longitude:-93.551986 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):2.2 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT428 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Arlington Ct Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-12 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.884668 Longitude:-93.551903 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.5 Lift 2 (in):1.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT429 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Heather Ct Lane:SB Core ID:C-13 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.881672 Longitude:-93.553779 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):1.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT430 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Heather Ct Lane:NB Core ID:C-14 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.881357 Longitude:-93.554412 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.7 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.5 Lift 2 (in):3.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout upper portion of core, low severity stripping in bottom 3.2" of core.DRAFT431 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Ashton Ct Lane:EB Core ID:C-15 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.889215 Longitude:-93.554157 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.9 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.6 Lift 2 (in):2.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout upper portion of core, medium severity stripping in bottom 2.3" of core.DRAFT432 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Ashton Ct Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-16 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.889106 Longitude:-93.554803 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.5 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):2.5 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT433 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Teton Ln Lane:SB Core ID:C-17 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.888876 Longitude:-93.553734 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.9 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):6 Lift 1 (in):3.3 Lift 2 (in):2.5 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 0.75". High severity stripping in upper 0.75" of core, low severity stripping in core from 0.75" to 3.3", and high severity stripping in remaining portion of core.DRAFT434 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Teton Ln Lane:NB Core ID:C-18 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.888268 Longitude:-93.553889 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.3 Lift 2 (in):2.5 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid in upper 1.3" portion of core, medium severity stripping in remaining portion of core.DRAFT435 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-001833 Roadway:Teton Ln Lane:WB Core ID:C-19 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.887857 Longitude:-93.554858 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):1.5 Lift 2 (in):2.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low to medium severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT436 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Teton Ln Lane:SB Core ID:C-20 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.888247 Longitude:-93.555524 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.5 Lift 2 (in):2.7 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid in upper 1.5" portion of core, medium severity stripping in remaining portion of core.DRAFT437 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Bretton Way Lane:EB Core ID:C-21 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.888345 Longitude:-93.552965 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core deteriorated, high severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT438 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Bretton Way Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-22 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.888207 Longitude:-93.552137 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):3.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 0.75". Medium severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT439 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Bretton Way Lane:SB Core ID:C-23 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.887606 Longitude:-93.552416 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.7 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.9 Lift 2 (in):2.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low to medium severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT440 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Bretton Way Lane:NB Core ID:C-24 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.886292 Longitude:-93.552121 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.7 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.2 Lift 2 (in):1.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT441 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Stratton Ct Lane:EB Core ID:C-25 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.885790 Longitude:-93.553933 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.8 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT442 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Stratton Ct Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-26 Date Cored:12/2/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.885749 Longitude:-93.554970 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):6.5 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):6 1/2 Lift 1 (in):3.0 Lift 2 (in):3.4 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 3.0". Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT443 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Devonshire Dr Lane:WB Core ID:C-27 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.884652 Longitude:-93.553452 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):2.2 Lift 2 (in):2.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT444 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Devonshire Dr Lane:WB Core ID:C-28 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.885111 Longitude:-93.553401 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):1.9 Lift 2 (in):2.0 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT445 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Devonshire Dr Lane:EB Core ID:C-29 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.885850 Longitude:-93.552379 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.6 Lift 2 (in):1.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal separated from core. High severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT446 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Devonshire Dr Lane:WB Core ID:C-30 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.886099 Longitude:-93.551553 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.5 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):2.4 Lift 2 (in):2.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal separated from core. High to medium severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT447 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Devonshire Dr Lane:EB Core ID:C-31 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.886332 Longitude:-93.550827 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):1.8 Condition: Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout. PAVEMENT CORE LOG DRAFT448 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Devonshire Dr Lane:WB Core ID:C-32 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.886667 Longitude:-93.550596 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.7 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):1.7 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT449 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Devonshire Dr Lane:EB Core ID:C-33 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.886767 Longitude:-93.550015 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):2.1 Lift 2 (in):2.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT450 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Weasley Ct Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-34 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.885606 Longitude:-93.551093 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):2.7 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.4 Lift 2 (in):1.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT451 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Butte Ct Lane:WB Core ID:C-35 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.872898 Longitude:-93.548152 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.5 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.3 Lift 2 (in):1.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT452 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Butte Ct Lane:EB Core ID:C-36 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.872796 Longitude:-93.547094 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.5 Lift 2 (in):2.0 Lift 3 (in):1.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Core separated at 1.5" and 3.5". Medium severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT453 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Butte Ct Lane:WB Core ID:C-37 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.872868 Longitude:-93.545846 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):2.6 Lift 2 (in):1.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT454 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Butte Ct Lane:EB Core ID:C-38 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.872735 Longitude:-93.545205 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.0 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):2.2 Lift 2 (in):1.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT455 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Trl Lane:WB Core ID:C-39 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.871205 Longitude:-93.547163 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.3 Lift 2 (in):2.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT456 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Trl Lane:EB Core ID:C-40 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.871559 Longitude:-93.546363 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.5 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):2.6 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT457 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Trl Lane:WB Core ID:C-41 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.871663 Longitude:-93.545322 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.7 Lift 2 (in):2.4 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT458 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Trl Lane:EB Core ID:C-42 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.871470 Longitude:-93.544820 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.6 Lift 2 (in):1.7 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT459 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Trl Lane:WB Core ID:C-43 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.871052 Longitude:-93.544418 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):2.2 Lift 2 (in):2.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT460 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-001833 Roadway:Saddlebrook Trl Lane:EB Core ID:C-44 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.870691 Longitude:-93.544376 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.7 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.9 Lift 2 (in):1.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Core separated at 1.9". Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT461 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Trl Lane:WB Core ID:C-45 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.870111 Longitude:-93.544155 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.0 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):2.0 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT462 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Trl Lane:EB Core ID:C-46 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.869681 Longitude:-93.543862 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):2.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT463 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Cactus Curve Lane:NB Core ID:C-47 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.870905 Longitude:-93.545891 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):1.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Core separated at 2.0". Low to medium severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT464 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Cactus Curve Lane:SB Core ID:C-48 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.870179 Longitude:-93.545958 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):2.5 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT465 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Cactus Curve Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-49 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.869885 Longitude:-93.545653 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.2 Lift 2 (in):2.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT466 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Cactus Curve Lane:EB Core ID:C-50 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.870188 Longitude:-93.544957 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.0 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.8 Lift 2 (in):2.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT467 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Pass Lane:EB Core ID:C-51 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.871543 Longitude:-93.543948 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.8 Lift 2 (in):1.7 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT468 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Pass Lane:WB Core ID:C-52 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.871807 Longitude:-93.543648 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):1.9 Lift 2 (in):2.0 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT469 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Pass Lane:EB Core ID:C-53 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.872206 Longitude:-93.543121 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):2.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT470 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Pass Lane:WB Core ID:C-54 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.872664 Longitude:-93.542520 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.9 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):1.8 Lift 2 (in):2.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT471 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Pass Lane:EB Core ID:C-55 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.872488 Longitude:-93.541709 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):2.4 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 2.4". Low to medium severity stripping throughout core. Crack propagating through core from top to bottom.DRAFT472 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Trotters Cir Lane:SB Core ID:C-56 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.871656 Longitude:-93.542853 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.2 Lift 2 (in):1.2 Condition: Chip seal present. Core separated at 2.2". Low severity stripping throughout bottom 1.2" portion of core. PAVEMENT CORE LOG DRAFT473 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Trotters Cir Lane:NB Core ID:C-57 Date Cored:12/5/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.870966 Longitude:-93.542651 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):3.1 Lift 2 (in):1.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 3.1". Medium to high severity stripping throughout core. DRAFT474 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Curve Lane:WB Core ID:C-58 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.868685 Longitude:-93.545878 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.5 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.7 Lift 2 (in):2.7 Lift 3 (in):1.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT475 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Curve Lane:EB Core ID:C-59 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.868745 Longitude:-93.544907 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):6 Lift 1 (in):3.5 Lift 2 (in):2.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT476 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Curve Lane:WB Core ID:C-60 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.869368 Longitude:-93.544145 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 1/2 Lift 1 (in):3.3 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT477 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Curve Lane:WB Core ID:C-61 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.869625 Longitude:-93.543313 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.0 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 1/2 Lift 1 (in):3.5 Lift 2 (in):1.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT478 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Saddlebrook Curve Lane:EB Core ID:C-62 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.869465 Longitude:-93.542788 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.0 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.8 Lift 2 (in):2.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 2.8". Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT479 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Canyon Curve Lane:NB Core ID:C-63 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.868335 Longitude:-93.545328 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.7 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.7 Lift 2 (in):1.0 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout upper 2.7", low severity stripping throughout remaining portion of core.DRAFT480 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Canyon Curve Lane:SB Core ID:C-64 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.867647 Longitude:-93.545548 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):2.8 Lift 2 (in):1.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 2.8". Low to medium severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT481 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Canyon Curve Lane:WB Core ID:C-65 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.867352 Longitude:-93.545308 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 Lift 1 (in):2.9 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT482 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Canyon Curve Lane:NB Core ID:C-66 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.867646 Longitude:-93.543972 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.5 Lift 2 (in):1.7 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 2.5". Medium severity stripping throughout core. Crack propagating through lift 2.DRAFT483 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Canyon Curve Lane:SB Core ID:C-67 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.868781 Longitude:-93.544171 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.0 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):1.0 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout upper 2.0", high severity stripping throughout remaining portion of core.DRAFT484 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mission Hills Ln Lane:WB Core ID:C-68 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.850948 Longitude:-93.533980 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):2.1 Lift 2 (in):2.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT485 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-001833 Roadway:Mission Hills Ln Lane:EB Core ID:C-69 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.850386 Longitude:-93.532607 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.8 Lift 2 (in):2.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT486 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mission Hills Ln Lane:NB Core ID:C-70 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.849684 Longitude:-93.531884 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):2.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout upper 2.0", low severity stripping throughout remaining portion of core.DRAFT487 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mission Hills Ln Lane:SB Core ID:C-71 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.848816 Longitude:-93.532086 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.1 Lift 2 (in):2.0 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT488 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mission Hills Ln Lane:NB Core ID:C-72 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.848246 Longitude:-93.531954 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.9 Lift 2 (in):1.7 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT489 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mission Hills Cir Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-73 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.849516 Longitude:-93.532510 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.9 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.6 Lift 2 (in):2.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT490 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mission Hills Cir Lane:SB Core ID:C-74 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.850537 Longitude:-93.533703 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.9 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):2.1 Lift 2 (in):1.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal separated from core. High severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT491 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Mission Hills Cir Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-75 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.849713 Longitude:-93.533597 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.4 Lift 2 (in):2.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal separated from core. High to medium severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT492 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Heron Dr Lane:WB Core ID:C-76 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.849759 Longitude:-93.562226 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):7.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):7 1/2 Lift 1 (in):4.3 Lift 2 (in):3.0 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT493 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Heron Dr Lane:EB Core ID:C-77 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.849760 Longitude:-93.561185 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):6.9 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):7 Lift 1 (in):3.9 Lift 2 (in):3.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal separated from core. High severity stripping throughout upper 1.5" of core. Remaining potion of core generally solid throughout.DRAFT494 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Heron Dr Lane:WB Core ID:C-78 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.850225 Longitude:-93.560467 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.3 Lift 2 (in):4.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT495 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Heron Dr Lane:EB Core ID:C-79 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.850400 Longitude:-93.559774 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT496 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Heron Dr Lane:WB Core ID:C-80 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.850404 Longitude:-93.559078 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.7 Lift 2 (in):2.5 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT497 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Heron Dr Lane:EB Core ID:C-81 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.850381 Longitude:-93.557823 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.2 Lift 2 (in):3.5 Condition: Chip seal present. Core separated at 2.2". Low severity stripping throughout core. PAVEMENT CORE LOG DRAFT498 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Swan Ct Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-82 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.851134 Longitude:-93.559218 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.9 Lift 2 (in):2.5 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout upper 1.9", low to medium severity stripping throughout remaining portion of core.DRAFT499 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Bittern Ct Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-83 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.850648 Longitude:-93.561265 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.6 Lift 2 (in):2.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core. Crack propagating from bottom of core up to approximately 1.9".DRAFT500 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Osprey Ln Lane:SB Core ID:C-84 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.849411 Longitude:-93.560587 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.5 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 1/2 Lift 1 (in):2.9 Lift 2 (in):2.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core separated at 2.9". Low severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT501 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Osprey Ln Lane:WB Core ID:C-85 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.847578 Longitude:-93.563141 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):7.0 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):7 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.4 Lift 2 (in):2.6 Lift 3 (in):2.1 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT502 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Osprey Ln Lane:EB Core ID:C-86 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.847464 Longitude:-93.562242 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.9 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):1.7 Lift 2 (in):2.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT503 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Osprey Ln Lane:WB Core ID:C-87 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.847675 Longitude:-93.561273 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.9 Lift 2 (in):1.7 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT504 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Osprey Ln Lane:EB Core ID:C-88 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.847856 Longitude:-93.560862 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.9 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):1.6 Lift 2 (in):2.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT505 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Osprey Ln Lane:SB Core ID:C-89 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.848218 Longitude:-93.560494 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.0 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.1 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout. Core separated at 2.1".DRAFT506 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Osprey Ln Lane:NB Core ID:C-90 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.848874 Longitude:-93.560448 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.4 Lift 2 (in):1.7 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Medium severity stripping throughout core.DRAFT507 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Bluebill Trl Lane:WB Core ID:C-91 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.849183 Longitude:-93.560085 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.6 Lift 2 (in):2.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core. Core separated at 2.6".DRAFT508 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Spoonbill Cir Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-92 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.849473 Longitude:-93.559256 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 3/4 Lift 1 (in):2.1 Lift 2 (in):2.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT509 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Bluebill Trl Lane:SB Core ID:C-93 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.848568 Longitude:-93.559113 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.9 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 Lift 1 (in):2.5 Lift 2 (in):2.4 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core. Core separated at 2.5".DRAFT510 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-001833 Roadway:Bluebill Trl Lane:SB Core ID:C-94 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.848070 Longitude:-93.559155 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):2.3 Lift 2 (in):1.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Medium severity stripping throughout core. Core separated at 2.3". Crack propagating from through core from top down.DRAFT511 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Bluebill Trl Lane:EB Core ID:C-95 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.847713 Longitude:-93.559782 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.4 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 Lift 1 (in):3.0 Lift 2 (in):1.4 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout intact portion of core. Core separated at 3.0". Crack propagating from through core from top down.DRAFT512 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Alisa Ln Lane:NB Core ID:C-96 Date Cored:12/7/2023 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.847075 Longitude:-93.562709 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.8 Lift 2 (in):2.5 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT513 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Alisa Ct Lane:SB Core ID:C-97 Date Cored:12/7/2023 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.847669 Longitude:-93.562581 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.4 Lift 2 (in):1.8 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Low severity stripping throughout core. Crack propagating through core from bottom up.DRAFT514 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Alisa Ct Lane:NB Core ID:C-98 Date Cored:12/7/2023 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.848399 Longitude:-93.562564 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.1 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.6 Lift 2 (in):1.5 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Medium to high severity stripping, increasing in severity with depth. Cracks beginning to propagate through core.DRAFT515 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Alisa Ct Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-99 Date Cored:12/7/2023 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.848711 Longitude:-93.561845 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 Lift 1 (in):2.5 Lift 2 (in):2.4 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout. Core separated at 2.1".DRAFT516 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Sunridge Ct Lane:EB Core ID:C-100 Date Cored:12/7/2023 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.844516 Longitude:-93.565468 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 1/4 Lift 1 (in):1.4 Lift 2 (in):1.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal separated from core. High to medium severity stripping throughout core, decreasing in severity with depth. Cracks beginning to propagate through core.DRAFT517 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Sunridge Ct Lane:EB Core ID:C-101 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.844218 Longitude:-93.567641 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 1/4 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT518 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Oakside Cir Lane:NB Core ID:C-102 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.842526 Longitude:-93.553998 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):2.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 Lift 1 (in):1.0 Lift 2 (in):1.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Unable to retrieve intact core. Core separated at 1.0". Deterioration and high severity stripping throughout core. DRAFT519 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Oakside Cir Lane:WB Core ID:C-103 Date Cored:12/7/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.842047 Longitude:-93.554519 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):2.9 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT520 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Bramble Dr Lane:Cul-de-sac Core ID:C-104 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.824098 Longitude:-93.538964 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/4 Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):2.2 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT521 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Bramble Dr Lane:NB Core ID:C-105 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.824339 Longitude:-93.539412 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.6 Lift 2 (in):1.9 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT522 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Raspberry Hill Lane:SB Core ID:C-106 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.825196 Longitude:-93.538249 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):2.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):5 Lift 1 (in):1.6 Lift 2 (in):1.0 Condition: Medium severity stripping throughout intact portion of core. Core separated at 1.6". PAVEMENT CORE LOG DRAFT523 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Delphinium Ln Lane:WB Core ID:C-107 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.824330 Longitude:-93.540191 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.6 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):3 3/4 Lift 1 (in):1.0 Lift 2 (in):2.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. High severity stripping throughout core. Core separated at 1.0". Crack propagating from bottom of core up to 1.0".DRAFT524 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Delphinium Ln Lane:EB Core ID:C-108 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.825202 Longitude:-93.539952 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.3 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.9 Lift 2 (in):1.4 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Medium severity stripping in upper 1.9" of core. Remaining portion of core deteriorated.DRAFT525 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Creekwood Dr Lane:SB Core ID:C-109 Date Cored:12/6/2022 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.819087 Longitude:-93.540127 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):4.2 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):4 1/2 Lift 1 (in):1.7 Lift 2 (in):2.6 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Chip seal present. Core generally solid throughout.DRAFT526 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Ches Mar Dr Lane:NB Core ID:C-110 Date Cored:1/26/2023 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.876258 Longitude:-93.587936 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):Not measured at this location Lift 1 (in):1.0 Lift 2 (in):1.8 Lift 3 (in):3.0 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Core generally solid in upper 3" portion of core. Low to medium severity stripping in remaining portion of core.DRAFT527 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Ches Mar Dr Lane:SB Core ID:C-111 Date Cored:1/26/2023 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.876829 Longitude:-93.587865 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):3.8 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):Not measured at this location Lift 1 (in):1.0 Lift 2 (in):1.0 Lift 3 (in):1.5 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Medium to high severity throughout core. Core emits smell of cutback/diesel fuel.DRAFT528 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen; #23-01 & #23-04 AET Project Number:P-0018335 Roadway:Ches Mar Dr Lane:NB Core ID:C-112 Date Cored:1/26/2023 GPS Coordinates: Latitude:44.876258 Longitude:-93.587936 Description: Core Diameter (in):4 Recovered Core Thickness (in):5.5 Bit. Downhole Thickness (in):Not measured at this location Lift 1 (in):2.0 Lift 2 (in):1.3 Lift 3 (in):2.3 Condition: PAVEMENT CORE LOG Core separated at 1". High severity stripping in upper 2" of core. Low severity stripping throughout remaining portion of core.DRAFT529 Particle Size Distribution 813/8in (9.5mm)64No.4 (4.75mm)52No.10 (2.0mm) 89½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 18.5No.200 (75µm)26No.100 (150µm) 46No.20 (850µm)40No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceGravelly silty sand, brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-094843-S1Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Creek Run TrlGeneral Location Depth: 3.5"-2.5'Location B-1Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-094843-S1 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/27/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-094843-S1 N/AComments DRAFT530 Particle Size Distribution 883/8in (9.5mm)70No.4 (4.75mm)51No.10 (2.0mm) 97½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 17.1No.200 (75µm)23No.100 (150µm) 40No.20 (850µm)33No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-094843-S2Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Charing BendGeneral Location Depth: 5"-3'Location B-2Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-094843-S2 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-094843-S2 N/AComments DRAFT531 Particle Size Distribution 913/8in (9.5mm)72No.4 (4.75mm)56No.10 (2.0mm) 97½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 19.5No.200 (75µm)26No.100 (150µm) 48No.20 (850µm)41No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceSilty sand with gravel, brown (SM); AASHTO A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-094843-S3Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Mulberry CirGeneral Location Depth: 3.75"-3.5'Location B-3Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-094843-S3 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/27/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-094843-S3 N/AComments DRAFT532 Particle Size Distribution 873/8in (9.5mm)72No.4 (4.75mm)57No.10 (2.0mm) 94½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 21.9No.200 (75µm)28No.100 (150µm) 49No.20 (850µm)43No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-094843-S4Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Mulberry CirGeneral Location Depth: 4.5"-2.5'Location B-4Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-094843-S4 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-094843-S4 N/AComments DRAFT533 Particle Size Distribution 923/8in (9.5mm)72No.4 (4.75mm)51No.10 (2.0mm) 96½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 18.4No.200 (75µm)23No.100 (150µm) 40No.20 (850µm)33No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceSilty sand with gravel, brown (SM); AASHTO A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-094843-S5Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Mulberry CirGeneral Location Depth: 3.75"-2'Location B-5Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-094843-S5 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/27/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-094843-S5 N/AComments DRAFT534 Particle Size Distribution 883/8in (9.5mm)74No.4 (4.75mm)56No.10 (2.0mm) 94½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 22.9No.200 (75µm)29No.100 (150µm) 45No.20 (850µm)39No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-094843-S6Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Mulberry CirGeneral Location Depth: 4"-1.5'Location B-6Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-094843-S6 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-094843-S6 N/AComments DRAFT535 Particle Size Distribution 833/8in (9.5mm)63No.4 (4.75mm)45No.10 (2.0mm) 93½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 15.7No.200 (75µm)21No.100 (150µm) 34No.20 (850µm)29No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-094843-S7Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Arlington CtGeneral Location Depth: 3.25"-3'Location B-7Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-094843-S7 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-094843-S7 N/AComments DRAFT536 Particle Size Distribution 903/8in (9.5mm)74No.4 (4.75mm)59No.10 (2.0mm) 94½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 19.2No.200 (75µm)26No.100 (150µm) 50No.20 (850µm)42No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-094843-S8Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Heather CtGeneral Location Depth: 3.25"-2'Location B-8Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-094843-S8 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-094843-S8 N/AComments DRAFT537 Particle Size Distribution 873/8in (9.5mm)71No.4 (4.75mm)55No.10 (2.0mm) 92½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 20.0No.200 (75µm)28No.100 (150µm) 46No.20 (850µm)41No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-094843-S9Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Ashton CtGeneral Location Depth: 4.5"-20"Location B-9Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-094843-S9 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-094843-S9 N/AComments DRAFT538 Particle Size Distribution 943/8in (9.5mm)77No.4 (4.75mm)61No.10 (2.0mm) 97½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 15.8No.200 (75µm)23No.100 (150µm) 50No.20 (850µm)40No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceSilty sand with gravel, brown (SM); AASHTO A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-094843-S10Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Teton LnGeneral Location Depth: 6"-17"Location B-10Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-094843-S10 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/27/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-094843-S10 N/AComments DRAFT539 Particle Size Distribution 923/8in (9.5mm)68No.4 (4.75mm)52No.10 (2.0mm) 98½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 20.0No.200 (75µm)27No.100 (150µm) 44No.20 (850µm)39No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-095249-S1Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Teton LnGeneral Location Depth: 3.75"-18"Location B-11Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-095249-S1 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-095249-S1 N/AComments DRAFT540 Particle Size Distribution 933/8in (9.5mm)75No.4 (4.75mm)57No.10 (2.0mm) 96½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 22.8No.200 (75µm)30No.100 (150µm) 48No.20 (850µm)43No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-095249-S2Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Teton LnGeneral Location Depth: 4"-15"Location B-12Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-095249-S2 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-095249-S2 N/AComments DRAFT541 Particle Size Distribution 853/8in (9.5mm)69No.4 (4.75mm)54No.10 (2.0mm) 89½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 20.4No.200 (75µm)28No.100 (150µm) 46No.20 (850µm)41No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-095249-S3Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Teton LnGeneral Location Depth: 4.25"-15"Location B-13Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-095249-S3 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-095249-S3 N/AComments DRAFT542 Particle Size Distribution 943/8in (9.5mm)78No.4 (4.75mm)62No.10 (2.0mm) 97½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 24.5No.200 (75µm)33No.100 (150µm) 52No.20 (850µm)47No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-095249-S4Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Bretton WayGeneral Location Depth: 4.25"-17"Location B-14Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-095249-S4 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-095249-S4 N/AComments DRAFT543 Particle Size Distribution 903/8in (9.5mm)77No.4 (4.75mm)60No.10 (2.0mm) 93½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 21.2No.200 (75µm)30No.100 (150µm) 51No.20 (850µm)45No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-095249-S5Sample ID 1/12/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Bretton WayGeneral Location Depth: 4.75"-18"Location B-15Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-095249-S5 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-095249-S5 N/AComments DRAFT544 Particle Size Distribution 903/8in (9.5mm)64No.4 (4.75mm)46No.10 (2.0mm) 98½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 16.8No.200 (75µm)21No.100 (150µm) 35No.20 (850µm)29No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-095249-S6Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Stratton CtGeneral Location Depth: 3.75"-17.5"Location B-16Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-095249-S6 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-095249-S6 N/AComments DRAFT545 Particle Size Distribution 893/8in (9.5mm)62No.4 (4.75mm)44No.10 (2.0mm) 95½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 14.3No.200 (75µm)19No.100 (150µm) 34No.20 (850µm)28No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-aMaterial Sample Details AET-095249-S7Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Devonshire DrGeneral Location Depth: 4"-13"Location B-17Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-095249-S7 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-095249-S7 N/AComments DRAFT546 Particle Size Distribution 893/8in (9.5mm)72No.4 (4.75mm)52No.10 (2.0mm) 96½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 16.2No.200 (75µm)22No.100 (150µm) 40No.20 (850µm)32No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-095249-S10Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Weasley CtGeneral Location Depth: 4.25"-17.5"Location B-20Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-095249-S10 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-095249-S10 N/AComments DRAFT547 Particle Size Distribution 893/8in (9.5mm)72No.4 (4.75mm)54No.10 (2.0mm) 93½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 20.6No.200 (75µm)26No.100 (150µm) 44No.20 (850µm)37No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-098479-S1Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Butte CtGeneral Location Depth: 4.5"-13"Location B-21Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-098479-S1 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-098479-S1 N/AComments DRAFT548 Particle Size Distribution 893/8in (9.5mm)69No.4 (4.75mm)50No.10 (2.0mm) 98½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 15.2No.200 (75µm)20No.100 (150µm) 38No.20 (850µm)31No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-098479-S2Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Butte CtGeneral Location Depth: 4"-16"Location B-22Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-098479-S2 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-098479-S2 N/AComments DRAFT549 Particle Size Distribution 833/8in (9.5mm)57No.4 (4.75mm)40No.10 (2.0mm) 92½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 9.0No.200 (75µm)12No.100 (150µm) 28No.20 (850µm)20No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SP-SM); AASHTO: A-1-aMaterial Sample Details AET-098479-S3Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Saddlebrook TrlGeneral Location Depth: 4.25"-18"Location B-23Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-098479-S3 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-098479-S3 N/AComments DRAFT550 Particle Size Distribution 853/8in (9.5mm)67No.4 (4.75mm)48No.10 (2.0mm) 94½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 18.4No.200 (75µm)22No.100 (150µm) 37No.20 (850µm)30No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-098479-S4Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Saddlebrook TrlGeneral Location Depth: 4.25"-18"Location B-24Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-098479-S4 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-098479-S4 N/AComments DRAFT551 Particle Size Distribution 903/8in (9.5mm)69No.4 (4.75mm)49No.10 (2.0mm) 98½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 15.8No.200 (75µm)20No.100 (150µm) 37No.20 (850µm)29No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-098479-S5Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Saddlebrook TrlGeneral Location Depth: 3.75"-18"Location B-25Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-098479-S5 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-098479-S5 N/AComments DRAFT552 Particle Size Distribution 893/8in (9.5mm)68No.4 (4.75mm)47No.10 (2.0mm) 93½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)97¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 12.0No.200 (75µm)15No.100 (150µm) 33No.20 (850µm)24No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SP-SM); AASHTO: A-1-aMaterial Sample Details AET-098479-S6Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Saddlebrook TrlGeneral Location Depth: 3.25"-19"Location B-26Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-098479-S6 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-098479-S6 N/AComments DRAFT553 Particle Size Distribution 923/8in (9.5mm)70No.4 (4.75mm)48No.10 (2.0mm) 100½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 10.8No.200 (75µm)14No.100 (150µm) 32No.20 (850µm)23No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SP-SM); AASHTO: A-1-aMaterial Sample Details AET-098479-S7Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Cactus CurveGeneral Location Depth: 3.75"-12.5"Location B-27Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-098479-S7 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-098479-S7 N/AComments DRAFT554 Particle Size Distribution 733/8in (9.5mm)51No.4 (4.75mm)33No.10 (2.0mm) 81½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 5.4No.200 (75µm)7No.100 (150µm) 20No.20 (850µm)13No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SP-SM); AASHTO: A-1-aMaterial Sample Details AET-098479-S8Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Cactus CurveGeneral Location Depth: 4.25"-17.5"Location B-28Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-098479-S8 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-098479-S8 N/AComments DRAFT555 Particle Size Distribution 903/8in (9.5mm)69No.4 (4.75mm)49No.10 (2.0mm) 95½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 12.4No.200 (75µm)16No.100 (150µm) 34No.20 (850µm)25No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-aMaterial Sample Details AET-098479-S9Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Cactus CurveGeneral Location Depth: 4.25"-14.5"Location B-29Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-098479-S9 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-098479-S9 N/AComments DRAFT556 Particle Size Distribution 953/8in (9.5mm)79No.4 (4.75mm)57No.10 (2.0mm) 99½in (12.5mm) 1001in (25.0mm)100¾in (19.0mm) % Passing Tested By: Limits 9.6No.200 (75µm)13No.100 (150µm) 38No.20 (850µm)25No.40 (425µm) Date Tested: On-siteSourceCrushed limestone, light brown (SM); AASHTO: A-1-bMaterial Sample Details AET-098479-S10Sample ID 1/13/2023Date Sampled GradationSpecificationAugerSampling Method Saddlebrook PassGeneral Location Depth: 3.5"-16"Location B-30Field Sample ID Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Sieve Size AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Construction Services550 Cleveland Ave NSt. Paul, MN 55114(651) 659-9001www.teamAET.comReport No: MAT:AET-098479-S10 Project:2023 City of Chanhassen #23-01 & #23-04 Client: Draft Report - Subject tochange pending final review 1/26/2023Date of Issue: CC:CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:P-0018335 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2023 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:AET-098479-S10 N/AComments DRAFT557 AET P-0018335 Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thickness 1 Area/Neighborhood Road Boring ID Core ID Recovered Core Core Downhole Measurement Lane Creek Run Trl C-1 3.6 3 3/4 -EB 44.890139 -93.560220 Creek Run Trl B-1 C-2 3.4 3 1/2 26.5 NB 44.890258 -93.560673 Creek Run Trl C-3 3.6 3 1/2 -WB 44.890740 -93.560524 Charing Bend B-2 C-4 4.8 5 31 Cul-de-sac 44.884649 -93.555307 Mulberry Cir B-3 C-5 3.7 3 3/4 26.75 NB 44.884112 -93.554868 Mulberry Cir C-6 4.1 4 -SB 44.883206 -93.555019 Mulberry Cir B-4 C-7 4.7 4 1/2 25.5 WB 44.882266 -93.553942 Mulberry Cir C-8 4.4 4 1/2 -EB 44.881803 -93.552432 Mulberry Cir B-5 C-9 3.7 3 3/4 44.25 SB 44.882571 -93.552547 Mulberry Cir C-10 4.3 4 1/4 -NB 44.883338 -93.552085 Mulberry Cir B-6 C-11 4.1 4 14 NB 44.884104 -93.551952 Arlington Ct B-7 C-12 3.3 3 1/4 32.75 Cul-de-sac 44.884735 -93.551993 Heather Ct B-8 C-13 3.8 3 3/4 20.75 SB 44.881813 -93.553708 Heather Ct C-14 5.7 5 3/4 -NB 44.881357 -93.554412 Ashton Ct B-9 C-15 3.9 4 1/2 15.5 EB 44.889224 -93.554253 Ashton Ct C-16 4.5 4 1/4 -Cul-de-sac 44.889106 -93.554803 Teton Ln B-10 C-17 5.9*6 11 SB 44.888926 -93.553746 Teton Ln B-11 C-18 3.8 3 3/4 14.25 NB 44.888240 -93.553955 Teton Ln B-12 C-19 3.8 4 11 WB 44.887913 -93.554871 Teton Ln B-13 C-20 4.3 4 1/4 10.75 SB 44.888285 -93.555732 Bretton Way B-14 C-21 4.1*4 1/4 12.75 EB 44.888363 -93.553076 Bretton Way C-22 5.8*5 3/4 -Cul-de-sac 44.888207 -93.552137 Bretton Way B-15 C-23 4.7 4 3/4 13.25 SB 44.887690 -93.552452 Bretton Way C-24 3.7 3 3/4 -NB 44.886292 -93.552121 Stratton Ct B-16 C-25 3.8 3 3/4 13.75 EB 44.885768 -93.554098 Stratton Ct C-26 6.5*6 1/2 -Cul-de-sac 44.885749 -93.554970 Devonshire Dr B-17 C-27 4.3 4 9 WB 44.884686 -93.553531 Devonshire Dr C-28 3.8 4 -WB 44.885111 -93.553401 Devonshire Dr C-29 4.2*4 1/4 -EB 44.885850 -93.552379 Devonshire Dr B-18 C-30 4.5*4 1/2 15 WB 44.886143 -93.551539 Devonshire Dr C-31 3.8 4 -EB 44.886332 -93.550827 Devonshire Dr B-19 C-32 3.7 3 3/4 12.75 WB 44.886685 -93.550628 Devonshire Dr C-33 4.4 4 1/2 -EB 44.886767 -93.550015 Weasley Ct B-20 C-34 2.7 4 1/4 13.25 Cul-de-sac 44.885645 -93.551164 Bituminous Thickness Measurements, (in)Base Thickness Measurement, (in)Latitude Longitude Curry Farm, Creek Run Trail, and Mulberry Circle DRAFT558 AET P-0018335 Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thickness 2 Butte Ct C-35 3.5 3 3/4 -WB 44.872898 -93.548152 Butte Ct B-21 C-36 4.6*4 1/2 8.5 EB 44.872832 -93.547364 Butte Ct C-37 3.8 4 -WB 44.872868 -93.545846 Butte Ct B-22 C-38 4.0 4 12 EB 44.872730 -93.545182 Saddlebrook Trl B-23 C-39 4.4 4 1/4 13.75 WB 44.871247 -93.547238 Saddlebrook Trl C-40 4.5 4 1/2 -EB 44.871559 -93.546363 Saddlebrook Trl B-24 C-41 4.1 4 1/4 13.75 WB 44.871670 -93.545303 Saddlebrook Trl C-42 4.2 4 1/4 -EB 44.871470 -93.544820 Saddlebrook Trl C-43 4.3 4 1/2 -WB 44.871052 -93.544418 Saddlebrook Trl B-25 C-44 3.7*3 3/4 14.25 EB 44.870682 -93.544457 Saddlebrook Trl C-45 4.0 4 1/4 -WB 44.870111 -93.544155 Saddlebrook Trl B-26 C-46 4.1 4 1/4 15.75 EB 44.869711 -93.543963 Cactus Curve B-27 C-47 3.6*3 3/4 8.75 NB 44.870910 -93.545846 Cactus Curve C-48 4.4 4 1/2 -SB 44.870179 -93.545958 Cactus Curve B-28 C-49 4.3 4 1/4 13.25 Cul-de-sac 44.869829 -93.545611 Cactus Curve B-29 C-50 4.0 4 1/4 10.25 EB 44.870141 -93.545066 Saddlebrook Pass B-30 C-51 3.4 3 1/2 12.5 EB 44.871594 -93.543871 Saddlebrook Pass C-52 3.8 4 -WB 44.871807 -93.543648 Saddlebrook Pass B-31 C-53 4.2 4 1/4 8.75 EB 44.872217 -93.543066 Saddlebrook Pass C-54 3.9 4 -WB 44.872664 -93.542520 Saddlebrook Pass B-32 C-55 4.2*4 1/2 12.5 EB 44.872457 -93.541736 Trotters Cir B-33 C-56 3.4*3 3/4 13.25 SB 44.871655 -93.542837 Trotters Cir B-34 C-57 4.3*4 1/4 12.75 NB 44.871007 -93.542583 Saddlebrook Curve B-35 C-58 5.5 5 3/4 12.25 WB 44.868705 -93.545671 Saddlebrook Curve C-59 5.6 6 -EB 44.868745 -93.544907 Saddlebrook Curve B-36 C-60 5.1 5 1/2 13 WB 44.869372 -93.544185 Saddlebrook Curve C-61 5.0 5 1/2 -WB 44.869625 -93.543313 Saddlebrook Curve B-37 C-62 5.0*5 1/4 13.75 EB 44.869490 -93.542855 Canyon Curve B-38 C-63 3.7 3 3/4 13.75 NB 44.868381 -93.545279 Canyon Curve B-39 C-64 4.3*4 1/2 14 SB 44.867629 -93.545617 Canyon Curve B-40 C-65 4.8 5 11.5 WB 44.867402 -93.545354 Canyon Curve B-41 C-66 4.2*4 1/4 13.5 NB 44.867665 -93.543903 Canyon Curve C-67 3.0*3 1/4 -SB 44.868781 -93.544171 Mission Hills Ln C-68 4.3 4 1/2 -WB 44.850948 -93.533980 Mission Hills Ln B-42 C-69 4.1 4 1/4 12.75 EB 44.850406 -93.532648 Mission Hills Ln B-43 C-70 4.2 4 1/4 9.25 NB 44.849745 -93.531889 Mission Hills Ln C-71 4.1 4 1/4 -SB 44.848816 -93.532086 Mission Hills Ln B-44 C-72 3.6 3 3/4 12.75 NB 44.848327 -93.531957 Mission Hills Ct C-73 3.9 4 1/4 -Cul-de-sac 44.849516 -93.532510 Mission Hills Cir C-74 3.9*4 -SB 44.850537 -93.533703 Mission Hills Cir B-45 C-75 5.3*5 3/4 5.75 Cul-de-sac 44.849794 -93.533715 Saddlebrook Area Mission Hills Area DRAFT559 AET P-0018335 Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thickness 3 Heron Drive C-76 7.3 7 1/2 -WB 44.849759 -93.562226 Heron Drive B-46 C-77 6.9*7 15 EB 44.849707 -93.561244 Heron Drive C-78 5.4 5 1/2 -WB 44.850225 -93.560467 Heron Drive C-79 3.8 4 -EB 44.850400 -93.559774 Heron Drive B-47 C-80 4.2 4 1/4 13.75 WB 44.850489 -93.559146 Heron Drive C-81 5.6*5 3/4 -EB 44.850381 -93.557823 Swan Ct C-82 4.4 4 1/2 -Cul-de-sac 44.851134 -93.559218 Bittern Ct B-48 C-83 4.4 4 1/2 12.5 Cul-de-sac 44.850774 -93.561348 Osprey Ln B-49 C-84 5.5*5 1/2 12.5 SB 44.849503 -93.560664 Osprey Ln B-50 C-85 7.0 7 1/4 34.75 WB 44.847652 -93.563133 Osprey Ln C-86 3.9 4 -EB 44.847464 -93.562242 Osprey Ln B-51 C-87 3.6 3 3/4 16.25 WB 44.847734 -93.561218 Osprey Ln C-88 3.9 4 -EB 44.847856 -93.560862 Osprey Ln B-52 C-89 4.0*3 3/4 14.25 SB 44.848241 -93.560542 Osprey Ln C-90 4.1*4 1/4 -NB 44.848874 -93.560448 Bluebill Trl B-53 C-91 5.2*5 1/4 10.25 WB 44.849228 -93.559890 Spoonbill Cir B-54 C-92 4.6 4 3/4 12.25 Cul-de-sac 44.849507 -93.559146 Bluebill Trl C-93 4.9*5 -SB 44.848568 -93.559113 Bluebill Trl B-55 C-94 4.1*4 12 SB 44.848079 -93.559179 Bluebill Trl C-95 4.4*5 -EB 44.847713 -93.559782 Alisa Ln B-56 C-96 4.3 4 1/4 16.25 NB 44.847347 -93.562673 Alisa Ct B-57 C-97 3.2 3 1/4 11.25 SB 44.847770 -93.562655 Alisa Ct C-98 3.1 3 1/4 -NB 44.848399 -93.562564 Alisa Ct B-58 C-99 4.8 5 13 Cul-de-sac 44.848839 -93.561812 Lake Susan Hills Area DRAFT560 AET P-0018335 Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thickness 4 Sunridge Ct C-100 3.0 3 1/4 -EB 44.844516 -93.565468 Sunridge Ct C-101 3.6 3 1/4 -Cul-de-sac 44.844218 -93.567641 Oakside Cir C-102 2.3*4 -EB 44.842526 -93.553998 Oakside Cir C-103 2.9 3 -Cul-de-sac 44.842047 -93.554519 Bramble Dr C-104 4.2 4 1/4 -EB 44.824098 -93.538964 Bramble Dr B-59 C-105 3.3 3 1/2 **WB 44.824339 -93.539412 Raspberry Hill C-106 2.6*5 -Cul-de-sac 44.825196 -93.538249 Delphinium Ln C-107 3.6*3 3/4 -SB 44.824330 -93.540191 Delphinium Ln C-108 3.3*4 1/2 -Cul-de-sac 44.825202 -93.539952 Creekwood Drive Neighborhood Creekwood Dr C-109 4.2 4 1/2 -WB 44.819087 -93.540127 Ches Mar Dr B-60 C-110 5.8 Not measured at this location **NB 44.876258 -93.587936 Ches Mar Dr B-61 C-111 3.8*Not measured at this location **SB 44.876829 -93.587865 Ches Mar Dr B-62 C-112 5.5*Not measured at this location **NB 44.877454 -93.587785 Bramble Drive Neighborhood Oakside Circle Neighborhood Ches Mar Drive Neighborhood Sunridge Court Neighborhood DRAFT561 AET P-0018335 Table Summary of Results and Recommendations City Project #Neighborhood Roadway Average Bituminous Downhole Thickness, in. Avgerage Base Thickness, in.Base Material Subgrade Material Recommended Rehabilitation Method FDR GE Creek Run Trl 3.6 26.5 Gravelly Silty Sand A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Charing Bend 5.0 31.0 Crushed Limestone Base A-2-4 2.5" M&O or 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Mulberry Cir 4.1 27.6 Crushed Limestone Base, Silty Sand with Gravel A-1-b, A-6 2" M&O or 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Arlington Ct 3.3 32.8 Crushed Limestone Base A-3 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Heather Ct 4.8 20.8 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 2" M&O or 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Ashton Ct 4.4 15.5 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Teton Ln 4.5 11.8 Crushed Limestone Base, Silty Sand with Gravel A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Bretton Way 4.6 13.0 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Stratton Ct 5.1 13.8 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Devonshire Dr 4.1 12.3 Crushed Limestone Base A-1-b, A-3, A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Weasley Ct 4.3 13.3 Crushed Limestone Base A-2-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Butte Ct 4.1 10.3 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Saddlebrook Trl 4.3 14.4 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 2.5" M&O or 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Cactus Curve 4.2 10.8 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Saddlebrook Pass 4.1 11.3 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Trotters Cir 4.0 13.0 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Saddlebrook Curve 5.6 13.0 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 3" M&O or 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Canyon Curve 4.2 13.2 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Mission Hills Ln 4.2 11.6 Crushed Limestone Base A-1-b, A-3, A-6 2" M&O or 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Mission Hills Cir 4.7 5.8 Crushed Limestone Base A-1-b, A-6 8" FDR, 4" Bit 13 Mission Hills Ct 4.3 5.8 Crushed Limestone Base A-1-b, A-6 2" M&O or 8" FDR, 4" Bit 13 Heron Drive 5.7 14.4 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Swan Ct 4.5 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Bittern Ct 4.5 12.5 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 2" M&O or 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Osprey Ln 4.6 19.4 Crushed Limestone Base, Silty Sand with Gravel A-2-4, A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Bluebill Trl 4.8 11.1 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Spoonbill Cir 4.8 12.3 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 2" M&O or 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Alisa Ln 4.3 16.3 Crushed Limestone Base A-1-b, A-2-4, A-6 2" M&O or 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Alisa Ct 3.8 12.1 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 Sunridge Court Neighborhood Sunridge Ct 3.3 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**Resurfacing Oakside Circle Neighborhood Oakside Cir 3.5 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**Resurfacing Bramble Dr 3.9 ***Resurfacing Raspberry Hill 5.0 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**Resurfacing Delphinium Ln 4.1 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**Resurfacing Creekwood Drive Neighborhood Creekwood Dr 4.5 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**2" M&O Ches Mar Drive Neighborhood Ches Mar Dr 5.0 ***Resurfacing *Soil boring not yet performed at these locations at the time of the draft report. **Soil borings were not performed at these locations. Thickness and material type references the standard City pavement section constructed. 23-04 Bramble Drive Neighborhood Pavement Coring/Soil Boring Results 23-01 Curry Farm, Creek Run Trail, and Mulberry Circle Saddlebrook Area Mission Hills Area Lake Susan Hills Area DRAFT562 Report of Geotechnical & Pavement Exploration 2023 City Pavement Rehab and Mill & Overlay Projects, Chanhassen, MN January 27, 2023 AET Report No. P-0018335 Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use DRAFT563 Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. P-0018335 Appendix B – Page 1 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC B.1 REFERENCE This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks relating to subsurface problems which are caused by construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. This information was developed and provided by GBA1, of which, we are a member firm. B.2 RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION B.2.1 Understand the Geotechnical Engineering Services Provided for this Report Geotechnical engineering services typically include the planning, collection, interpretation, and analysis of exploratory data from widely spaced borings and/or test pits. Field data are combined with results from laboratory tests of soil and rock samples obtained from field exploration (if applicable), observations made during site reconnaissance, and historical information to form one or more models of the expected subsurface conditions beneath the site. Local geology and alterations of the site surface and subsurface by previous and proposed construction are also important considerations. Geotechnical engineers apply their engineering training, experience, and judgment to adapt the requirements of the prospective project to the subsurface model(s). Estimates are made of the subsurface conditions that will likely be exposed during construction as well as the expected performance of foundations and other structures being planned and/or affected by construction activities. The culmination of these geotechnical engineering services is typically a geotechnical engineering report providing the data obtained, a discussion of the subsurface model(s), the engineering and geologic engineering assessments and analyses made, and the recommendations developed to satisfy the given requirements of the project. These reports may be titled investigations, explorations, studies, assessments, or evaluations. Regardless of the title used, the geotechnical engineering report is an engineering interpretation of the subsurface conditions within the context of the project and does not represent a close examination, systematic inquiry, or thorough investigation of all site and subsurface conditions. B.2.2 Geotechnical Engineering Services are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects, and At Specific Times Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs, goals, and risk management preferences of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civil-works constructor or even a different civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. Likewise, geotechnical engineering services are performed for a specific project and purpose. For example, it is unlikely that a geotechnical engineering study for a refrigerated warehouse will be the same as one prepared for a parking garage; and a few borings drilled during a preliminary study to evaluate site feasibility will not be adequate to develop geotechnical design recommendations for the project. Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: •for a different client; •for a different project or purpose; •for a different site (that may or may not include all or a portion of the original site); or •before important events occurred at the site or adjacent to it; e.g., man-made events like construction or environmental remediation, or natural events like floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Note, too, the reliability of a geotechnical-engineering report can be affected by the passage of time, because of factors like changed subsurface conditions; new or modified codes, standards, or regulations; or new techniques or tools. If you are the least bit uncertain about the continued reliability of this report, contact your geotechnical engineer before applying the recommendations in it. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis after the passage of time – if any is required at all – could prevent major problems. 1 Geoprofessional Business Association, 15800 Crabbs Branch Way, Suite 300, Rockville, MD 20855 Telephone: 301/565-2733: www.geoprofessional.org, 2019 B.2.3 Read the Full Report DRAFT564 Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. P-0018335 Appendix B – Page 2 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical-engineering report did not read the report in its entirety. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selective elements only. Read and refer to the report in full. B.2.4 You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer About Change Your geotechnical engineer considered unique, project-specific factors when developing the scope of study behind this report and developing the confirmation-dependent recommendations the report conveys. Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include those that affect: •the site’s size or shape; •the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, function or weight of the proposed structure and the desired performance criteria; •the composition of the design team; or •project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project or site changes – even minor ones – and request an assessment of their impact. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise would have considered. B.2.5 Most of the “Findings” Related in This Report Are Professional Opinions Before construction begins, geotechnical engineers explore a site’s subsurface using various sampling and testing procedures. Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at those specific locations where sampling and testing is performed. The data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your geotechnical engineer, who then applied professional judgement to form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ – maybe significantly – from those indicated in this report. Confront that risk by retaining your geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team through project completion to obtain informed guidance quickly, whenever needed. B.2.6 This Report’s Recommendations Are Confirmation-Dependent The recommendations included in this report – including any options or alternatives – are confirmation-dependent. In other words, they are not final, because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied heavily on judgement and opinion to do so. Your geotechnical engineer can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions exposed during construction. If through observation your geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist actually do exist, the recommendations can be relied upon, assuming no other changes have occurred. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation-dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform construction observation. B.2.7 This Report Could Be Misinterpreted Other design professionals’ misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a continuing member of the design team, to: •confer with other design-team members; •help develop specifications; •review pertinent elements of other design professionals’ plans and specifications; and •be available whenever geotechnical engineering guidance is needed. You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this report. Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction-phase observations. B.2.8 Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift unanticipated-subsurface-conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent the costly, contentious problems this practice has caused, include the complete geotechnical engineering report, along with any attachments or appendices, with your contract documents, but be certain to note conspicuously that you’ve included the material for information purposes only. To avoid misunderstanding, you may also want to note that “informational purposes” means constructors have no right to rely on the interpretations, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations in the report. Be certain that constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, including options selectedDRAFT 565 Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. P-0018335 Appendix B – Page 3 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC from the report, only from the design drawings and specifications. Remind constructors that they may perform their own studies if they want to, and be sure to allow enough time to permit them to do so. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Conducting prebid and preconstruction conferences can also be valuable in this respect. B.2.9 Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some client representatives, design professionals, and constructors do not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This happens in part because soil and rock on project sites are typically heterogeneous and not manufactured materials with well-defined engineering properties like steel and concrete. That lack of understanding has nurtured unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments, delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. To confront that risk, geotechnical engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled “limitations,” many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers’ responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. B.2.10 Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The personnel, equipment, and techniques used to perform an environmental study – e.g., a “phase-one” or “phase- two” environmental site assessment – differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical engineering study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually provide environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project failures. If you have not obtained your own environmental information about the project site, ask your geotechnical consultant for a recommendation on how to find environmental risk-management guidance. B.2.11 Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture Infiltration and Mold While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, water infiltration, or similar issues in this report, the engineer’s services were not designed, conducted, or intended to prevent migration of moisture – including water vapor – from the soil through building slabs and walls and into the building interior, where it can cause mold growth and material-performance deficiencies. Accordingly, proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer’s recommendations will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration. Confront the risk of moisture infiltration by including building-envelope or mold specialists on the design team. Geotechnical engineers are not building- envelope or mold specialists.DRAFT566 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Resolution 2023-XX: Approve Settlement Agreement for Parcels 14 and 20 as part of the CSAH 101 Improvement Project File No.ENG 14-08 Item No: D.13 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution approving Settlement Agreements for Parcels 14 and 20 as part of the CSAH 101 Improvement Project." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY As part of the County Highway 101 project, eminent domain procedures are being used on various parcels along the corridor to feasibly allow for the construction of the highway improvements. The project is primarily funded from MnDOT turnback funds, state bond proceeds, and county sources. The only funding responsibility of the city is for municipal sewer and watermain infrastructure, and therefore these settlements do not involve city funds. Council approval is necessary since we are the lead agency on the project. The city will be paying the settlements and getting reimbursed from the county. Approving the agreements eliminates the need to move forward with District Court proceedings, which incur additional time, expense, and potential risk to the ultimate cost of the taking. 567 BACKGROUND N/A DISCUSSION N/A BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Settlement Agreements. ATTACHMENTS S.A.P. 194-020-014 - Right-of-Way Map Resolution Mediated Settlement Agreement-Parcel 14 Stipulation of Settlement-Parcel 20 568 569 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE:March 20, 2023 RESOLUTION NO: 2023-XX MOTION BY:SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION APPROVING SETTLEMENTAGREEMENTS FOR CSAH 101 PARCELS 14 & 20 WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen (“City”), having the power of eminent domain as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117, filed a petition in eminent domain proceedings and motion for early transfer of title and possession to acquire various interests in land in the City of Chanhassen for the reconstruction, expansion, and improvement of County State Aid Highway 101 from County State Aid Highway 14 (Pioneer Trail) to County State Aid Highway 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the Petition for the Project was filed on November 18, 2019, as a part of Carver County Court File No. 10-CV-19-1132 (the “Action”); and WHEREAS,to facilitate the Project, the Action included acquiring certain real property interests owned by Harry and Judy Niemela Trust (the “Owner”) and as defined as Parcel 11 within the Action (the “Properties”); and WHEREAS,to facilitate the Project, the Action included acquiring certain real property interests owned by Donald Halla and Halla Family Limited Partnership (the “Owner”) as defined as Parcels 14 and 20 within the Action (the “Properties”); and WHEREAS,subject to approval by the City Council, representatives of the parties have negotiated Settlement Agreements, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit A, which resolves all outstanding claims and issues between the parties related to the Properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council has fully considered the terms of the Settlement Agreements and has determined that it is in the best interests of the community to approve them as presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the above-referenced recitals are incorporated in this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Settlement Agreements are hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor, City Manager, and/or the Public Works Director of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute all appropriate documents and take all necessary actions to facilitate the settlementscontemplated herein, with all such actions to be in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Resolutionand the incorporated Settlement Agreements. 570 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager of the City, staff, and consultants are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all additional steps and actions necessary or convenient in order to accomplish the intent of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 20th day of March, 2023. ATTEST: Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 571 A-1 EXHIBIT A The Settlement Agreements 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Minnetonka Middle School West Access Improvement Project Update File No.N/A Item No: G.1 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A - info item only Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Communications SUMMARY Staff will give a presentation as a communication update to Council and the public. No formal action is being requested or needed at this time. BACKGROUND N/A DISCUSSION N/A BUDGET N/A 585 RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS 586 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item Appeal of 6621 Minnewashta Parkway: Consider a Request for Variances for the Construction (NOTE: This item was asked to be removed from the agenda by the applicant) File No.Planning Case 2022-17 Item No: G.2 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council denies the requested 3.57 percent lot cover variance, approves the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approves the requested 12-foot front yard setback variance, and approves a 1.13 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a home and deck, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision." Language for an alternative motion granting the requested appeal can be found in the recommendation section. Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The applicant is appealing the Planning Commission's decision to deny the lot cover portion of their variance request and has submitted a revised plan requesting a 3.57 percent lot cover variance instead of the initial 7.13 percent lot cover variance. The variance also includes a 30-foot shoreland setback variance and a 12-foot front yard setback variance that are consistent with what was approved by the Planning Commission. Finally, the applicant has withdrawn a request for a variance to place a parking area within the right-of-way which was denied by the Planning Commission. 587 Staff appreciates that the applicant has removed the proposed parking area from the right-of-way and reduced the amount of proposed lot cover by switching from an impervious patio to a deck; however, as the Planning Commission stated in their discussion of the variance request, the difficulties with the property’s lot cover are principally related to the size and layout/configuration of the proposed home. As the property exceeds its district’s minimum lot area and already benefits from an existing 251 square feet of non-conforming lot cover, the requested lot cover variance is not the result of constraints imposed by the parcel but rather by the design proposed by the applicant. Various options such as switching to a front loading garage or reducing the main level footprint would permit the applicant to have reasonable use of the property within the approved 5,800 square-foot lot cover variance approved by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND On January 17, 2023 the Planning Commission voted unanimously to deny the requested 7.13% lot cover variance, deny the requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way, approve the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approve the requested 13-foot front yard setback variance, and approve a 1.13% lot cover variance for the construction of a home and patio. During the Public Hearing one member of the public expressed concern about the proposed home’s impact on their view of the lake. While variances are not requested for either the height or side yard setback of the structure, the requested lot cover variance would indirectly impact the view by allowing for the construction of a home occupying more of the area between the required side yard setbacks than would otherwise be possible. An email in support of the applicant’s variance request was also submitted to the Planning Commission and is included as an attachment. During the meeting the Planning Commission made the following comments: Commissioner Schwartz asked if staff had conveyed concerns about this application prior to the meeting. Staff indicated that they had and that the applicant had addressed some concerns relating to the shoreland setback but that the applicant would have to speak to why they were requesting the proposed lot cover increase. Commissioner Alto asked if parking was the primary concern and, if so, why did they select a home on a street without street parking. The applicant replied that they did not realize the extent of the issue until they started living on the property. Commissioner Alto asked if reducing the proposed guest parking would significantly impact the usability of the driveway. The applicant indicated that he was uncertain, but felt an adequate turnaround was needed. Commissioner Schwartz expressed concern about the precedent of permitting parking areas within city right-of-way, and stated that the applicant should attempt to meet the requirements of the zoning code to the greatest extent possible. The applicant indicated that they would be willing to collaborate with staff on a solution. Commissioner Soller indicated that the lot coverage variance was likely a larger issue than the parking area. The applicant agreed. Commissioner Alto expressed concern that granting a lot cover variance would encourage other properties in the area to request larger lot cover variances and expressed the need to maintain a 588 consistent approach to lot cover variances. Commissioner Alto asked what the impact of denying the lot cover variance would be. Staff replied that the footprint of the proposed home would need to be reduced. Commissioner Schwartz asked if rain gardens could address stormwater runoff. Staff replied that they can, but that they should not be used to justify increasing a property’s lot cover. Commissioner Soller asked if there was a precedent for permitting encroachments into the right-of-way on Minnewashta Parkway. Staff noted that there were some non-conforming encroachments, including some dual access, one of which was removed as part of a variance request, and a portion of a turnaround. City wide staff recalled one variance being granted for a similar encroachment, although staff had recommended denial. Chair Noyes and Commissioner Soller asked if the city historically grants lot cover variances similar to what the applicant is requesting. Staff indicated that comparisons are difficult, but that large lot cover variances are typically only granted to substandard lots and that staff could not recall ever receiving a variance request for over 7,000 square feet of total lot cover. Commissioner Schwartz asked if staff would support a reduced lot cover variance. Staff indicated that they believed the lot provided sufficient lot cover and that staff could not support increasing lot cover above the existing non-conformity, unless clear, practical difficulties were identified. Commissioner Soller asked if the inability to construct a basement would be considered a practical difficulty. Staff replied that many properties in the city cannot construct basements, and that a two-story home of reasonable size can be constructed without the requested lot cover variance. Chair Noyes stated that he believed the lot has practical difficulties, but the applicant is proposing a home that is too large for the lot. On January 20, 2023 the applicant submitted an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision. On February 21, 2023 the applicant met with staff to discuss revisions made in response to the Planning Commission’s Comments. The revisions removed the parking area from the public right-of-way and replaced the proposed impervious patio with decking. These changes removed the need for a variance to place a parking area in the right-of-way and reduced the requested lot cover variance from 7.13 percent to 3.25 percent. Staff indicated that they appreciated the effort to reduce lot cover, but noted that the home’s footprint remained unchanged. Staff maintained that an alternative home and driveway configuration could provide reasonable use without exceeding the 5,800 square feet of lot cover approved by the Planning Commission. On March 3, 2023 the applicant submitted a revised proposal requesting a 3.57 percent lot cover variance, eliminating the previously requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way, and shifting the home pad back approximately one foot from the front lot line. The summary minutes from the January 17 Public Hearing are attached. DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting a 30-foot shoreland setback variance, 12-foot front yard setback variance, 589 and a 3.57 percent lot cover variance to build a new home and deck replacing an existing home and deck/patio. The existing structures encroach 35 feet into the shoreland setback, 7.3 feet into the front yard setback, and exceed the permitted lot cover by 1.13 percent. As all parties agree on the requested setbacks and the proposed parking area in the right-of-way has been removed, the discussion will focus on the requested lot cover variance. The applicant has indicated that the proposed lot cover associated with the driveway is necessary due to Minnewashta Parkway’s lack of on-street parking and the need to provide a turnaround for safe access onto collector streets. They have stated that the home's footprint is needed to provide for adequate storage area and to accommodate aging in place and that the proposed design represents compromises such as not including a formal dining space, robust work-from-home space, and additional in-home storage. They have noted that without the need for a turnaround, their proposal would only exceed the lot cover approved by the Planning Commission by 62 square feet. The city’s policy is to limit the spread and expansion of nonconforming structures by not granting variances to expand nonconformities unless those variances are justified by a practical difficulty unique to the property that does not result from the owner’s design choices. The requested lot cover variance would expand the property’s lot cover from the current nonconforming 5,800 square feet to 6,341 square feet, a 541 square-foot increase. As the property exceeds the city’s minimum required lot size, the parcel’s physical characteristics do not justify the proposed increase. Staff cannot agree with the applicant’s implication that the requested lot cover variances are needed due to the city’s requirement for a turnaround. While City Code does require a turnaround for properties accessing collector roads, this requirement does not necessitate a turnaround of the size or configuration proposed by the applicant. All a turnaround needs to be is an area that can facilitate a design vehicle to pull in head first to the driveway and then pull out of the driveway head first. An applicant can demonstrate compliance with this standard through a turning movement analysis. In short, a turnaround meeting city requirements could be met with a smaller feature or be incorporated into the overall design of a smaller driveway. Examining the variance request, it is clear that the requested lot cover variance results from the applicant increasing the footprint of the existing house from 1,901 square feet to a proposed 3,696 square feet. The proposed 1,136 square-foot garage and 4,500 square feet of living space exceed what has historically been found necessary for a resident to have reasonable use of their property. There also exists the potential for placing a larger home on the lot by switching to a front-loading garage which would significantly reduce the amount of surface area required for the driveway. In summation, variances should only be granted in response to practical difficulties caused by the unique characteristics of a parcel, and only to the extent necessary to provide reasonable use of the parcel. Variance requests that have their genesis in the design choices of property owners do not meet these criteria. The requested lot cover variance results from the size and configuration of the proposed home and driveway. While the presence of Minnewashta Parkway does require a turnaround and off- street parking, the size of the parcel and approved lot cover variance provide adequate relief from those difficulties. During discussions with the applicant the applicant indicated that they would be receptive to using permeable pavers to further mitigate the impact of the proposed lot cover. While properly designed and maintained pervious paver systems allow for the infiltration of stormwater, they do not replace the function of vegetation and are considered be lot cover by both the city and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The DNR recommends that cities define permeable pavers as impervious 590 surface within the shoreland management district in order to prevent their use as a "workaround" to avoid meeting the 25 percent impervious surface limit. When the city elected to permit the use of permeable pavers in some portions of the city, the shoreland management district was excluded in order to align with this guidance from the DNR. For these reasons staff informed the applicant that they could not support allowing the use of pervious pavers to effectively increase the property's lot cover. The attached Planning Commission staff report shows a full analysis of the original variance request. Staff has also attached an exhibit updating the tables presented in the staff report to reflect the reduction in proposed lot cover and to show a potential alternative design that would meet the variance approved by the Planning Commission. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council deny the requested lot cover variance and uphold the variance approved by the Planning Commission. Alternatively, if the City Council finds that the applicant's request should be approved, staff recommend that the City Council make the following motion: The Chanhassen City Council approves the requested 3.57 percent lot cover variance, approves the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, and approves the requested 12-foot front yard setback variance for the construction of a home and deck, subject to the conditions of approval, and directs staff to draft supporting Findings of Facts and Decision. ATTACHMENTS Applicant's Appeal Narrative Revised Plans for Appeal Appeal Letter from Applicant Updated Staff Exhibits PC Staff Report FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION 6621 Minnewashta Parkway City Council Variance Document 22-17 - City Council Letter from neighbor Bequette Planning Commission Summary Minutes 591 Re: 6621 Minnewashta Parkway Keri and Cordell Mack March 3, 2023 Variance Application City of Chanhassen Practical Difficulty (Updated 3.3.23) Honorable Plan Commission, City Council Members and City Planner: We appreciate the continued diligence and feedback pertaining to our Variance Application for our home at 6621 Minnewashta Parkway. In light of the Planning Commission’s January meeting recommendations and with ongoing engagement with the City Staff, we have made several accommodations to the project. Our December 16, 2022 project narrative includes various functional limitations of the site and property, including the challenges with safety, lack of on-street parking, concern entering / exiting the location, and excessive road speeds. Those facts and considerations remain unchanged; however, considering the feedback received and desire for collaboration the following accommodations have been made in our plan: • Reduced the overall hardcover from our original as with Planning Commission at 32.13% (6.00% over current hardscape) to what is currently proposed at 28.57% (2.44% over current hardscape). • Accepted City Staff’s recommendation to migrate backyard patio to decking material. • Removed all encroachments in the right-a-way. • Complied with statutes pertaining to living on a Collector Road and included a turnaround consistent with City Engineer’s notes. • Shifted the entire home to the South on the South Utility Easement line to maximize the set back to the North (and further accommodate space for snow removal). In addition, we looked at several different home designs and configurations, and we concluded that as it relates to the home aspect itself, there are several practical challenges as a family that limit design flexibility. • The home is planned to have a four (4) car garage largely due to the lack of storage (no basement level in the home design due to height restrictions) and no available street parking. Recall, there is no parking on Minnewashta Parkway, and City Staff estimated in commentary that it is reasonable for a homeowner to have street access for parking of up to four (4) to six (6) vehicles. As such, the driveway in front of the fourth stall also serves as a parking spot as well. • Need for aging in place home design with owner’s suite located on main level. 592 • We have balanced these needs with other sacrifices throughout the home whereby we eliminated a robust office / work from home space, formal dining space, and normal in-home storage. While we recognize a desire to fully comply with the current hardcover percentage as recommended by the Planning Commission, we believe if not for living on the Parkway and need for the turnaround, we would generally meet that recommendation with only 62 feet of hardcover above existing (when the turnaround is not included). As noted in our December and March narratives, this property is challenged both in terms of actual home planning (height restrictions, lack of storage, etc.) and accommodating the Parkway (lack of on street parking, need for turnaround, etc.). If each accommodation (home and driveway) is reviewed for the underlying practical challenges, we believe the combined outcome of a minor variance (.28 percent) above exiting hardscape is reasonable and fits the circumstance of practical difficulty. Existing Property Proposed - January 2023 Proposed - March 2023 Hardscape 5,800 7,132 6,341 Total Lot 22,194 22,194 22,194 % of Total 26.13%32.13%28.57% Impact from Turnaround / Collector Road: Turnaround Coverage 479 Est. Hardscape w/o Turnaround Coverage 5,862 % of Total w/o Turnaround Coverage 26.41% % Variance over Existing -0.28% Sq. Ft. Variance over Existing (62) 593 233 sq ft 21'-6PROPOSED STRUCTURE29'-8"EXISTING STRUCTURE18'-0"PROPOSED STRUCTURE60'-3"EXISTING STRUCTURE62'-0"PROPOSED54'-6"PROPOSED PATIO47'-6"EXISTING DECK5FT SETBACK2,560 sq ft 1,136 sq ft 1,825 sq ft 88 sq ft 479 sq ftMAINTAIN EXISTING PAVED SETBACK PROPOSED HOME PROPOSED DECK PROPOSED SIDEWALKTURN AROUND PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 7060504030802010NWES0 10'20'40'60'SUMMER SOLSTICESUNRISEWINTER SOLSTICESUNRISESUMMER SOLSTICESUNRISEWINTER SOLSTICESUNRISESHEET L1 REVIEW 01 MARCH 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 594 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 10'-1-1/8"" APPROX. SF =2,565 FINISHED + 1,136 GARAGE MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 8'-0" 4'-0"8'-0"2'-8"8'-0"3'-0"FLUSHFLUSHDOWN 6" DOWN 6" GARAGE GREAT ROOM DW COOKTOP DINING LAUNDRY COVERED ENTRY DECK WOOD STONE WOODWOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD DW TILE WOOD WOOD TILE TILE 8'-0" 16'-0" 8'-0" 16'-0" 8'-0" 3'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 3'-0"8'-0"6'-0"8'-0" 2'-8" 8'-0" 3'-0"8'-0"2'-4"8'-0" 2'-8" 8'-0" 2'-8" 8'-0" 2'-6" 8'-0" 2'-8" 8'-0" 6'-0" ELEC ROLL-UP HOSE REEL 30" FRZR 30" REFDBLOVENS O. BEDROOM O. CLOSET O. BATHSCULLERY GAS FPLC KITCHEN 4 SEASON PORCH WORK AREA CLOSET FOYER POWDER W/D TV TV MIRROR MUDROOM 14'-6"x 15'-9" 13'-9"x 14'-2" 12'-0"x 22'-0"16'-6"x 22'-0" 7'-8"x 7'-0" 20'-0"x 13'-0" 10'-2"x 9'-8" 13'-8"x 10'-0" 13'-9"x 5'-9" 5'-0"x 6'-8" 5'-6"x 8'-6" MOP SINK HOT/COLD 24'-0"x 35'-10" 41'-3"x 13'-10"CLIENTSHEET A1 REVIEW 01 MARCH 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 595 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 9'-1-1/8"" APPROX. SF =1,179 FINISHED + 844 BONUS SPACE + 277 MECH/STORAGE UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 202202 104D 104D 105D 104D 104D7'-0"2'-6"7'-0"2'-8"7'-0"2'-8"7'-0" 2'-6" 7'-0" 2'-6"7'-0"2'-8"7'-0"4'-0"7'-0"4'-0"7'-0" 2'-6"7'-0"5'-0"7'-0" 4'-0"7'-0"4'-0"7'-0"3'-0"7'-0" 2'-8" 104D 104D 7'-0"2'-8"7'-0" 2'-6" CARPET CARPET CARPET CARPET CARPET CARPET CARPETCARPET TILE TILE TILE LVT LVT LVT LVT STAIR 104D 7'-0"2'-8"BENCH WDLAUNDRY BEDROOM 4 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 2 KIDS REC ROOM BUNK ROOM FLEX SPACE TV TV TV SNACK BAR ENSUITE BATH 2 SHARED BATH BONUS BATH MECHANICAL STORAGE WIC 3WIC 2 UPPER HALL LINEN STORAGE 5'-0"x5'-0"5'-0"x5'-0" 12'-3"x15'-8" 15'-9"x8'-7" 10'-0"x10'-6"CLIENTSHEET A2 REVIEW 01 MARCH 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 596 FOUNDATION -4'-0" M.L. SUBFLOOR 9XX.X' ±0" U.L. SUBFLOOR +11'-11 7/8" U.L. CEILING +21'-1" 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 EAST ELEVATION 2 WEST ELEVATION SHEET A3 REVIEW 01 MARCH 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 597 FOUNDATION -4'-0" M.L. SUBFLOOR 9XX.X' ±0" U.L. SUBFLOOR +11'-11 7/8" U.L. CEILING +21'-1" M.L. SUBFLOOR 9XX.X' ±0" U.L. SUBFLOOR +11'-11 7/8" U.L. CEILING +21'-1" 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 NORTH ELEVATION SHEET A4 REVIEW 01 MARCH 2023 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 598 From: Cordell Mack <cordell.mack@vmghealth.com> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2023 5:25 PM To: Young-Walters, MacKenzie <mwalters@chanhassenmn.gov> Cc: Erin Tadych <Erin@eskuche.us>; K Mack <mamamack44@gmail.com>; Peter Eskuche <peter@eskuche.us> Subject: Re: 6621 Minnewashta Parkway, Excelsior Hi MacKenzie Just following up per the Planning Commission’s recommendation related to our proposed variance. By way of this email, we are reapectfully appealing the decision and would like to bring forward the proposal to the City Council in February. Please acknowledge receipt at your convenience. Thank you. Cordell Mack cordell.mack@vmghealth.com C) 612.597.8657 O) 952.641.4324 Sent from my iPhone Cordell Mack , MPT, MBA Managing Director Direct: 952-641-4324 Cell: 612-597-8657 / Edina , MN www.vmghealth.com | LinkedIn 599 Zoning Summary *Ordinance allows homes built prior to February 19, 1987 to have an open porch with a 20 foot front yard setback. **28 foot setback variance granted for deck. Unclear why it was built with 40 foot shoreland setback rather than 47 foot shoreland setback. ***Driveways must maintain a ten foot setback for first 20 feet of length after which they can reduce the setback down to 5 feet. The City Engineer can also approve a 5 foot setback for the entire driveway length. Initial Submittal Revised Submittal Ordinance Existing Initial Proposal Revised for Appeal Zoning PUDR PUDR PUDR PUDR Lot Area 20,000 22,194 22,194 22,194 Front Yard Setback 30*22.7*17 18 Side Yard Setback 10 10 10 10 Shoreland Setback 75 52 (house)/ 40 (deck/patio)** 54 (house)/45 (patio)54 (house)/45 (deck) Hard Surface Coverage 25% (5,000 SF)26.13% (5,800 SF)32.13% (7,132 SF)28.57% (6,341 SF) Lot Frontage 90’189’189’189’ Lot Depth 125’115’115’115’ Structure Height 35’Unknown 30’30’ Water Oriented Structure 250 Square Feet None None None Driveway Setback 5’***3’3’5’ 600 Example of Potential Alternative Layout Switching to a front loading garage could provide a comparable building footprint (3,719 sq. ft. instead of the 3,701 sq. ft. proposed) served by smaller driveway (1,680 sq. ft. instead of the 2,304 sq. ft. proposed). The total lot cover in this sketch is around 5,550 sq. ft. which leaves 250 sq. ft. free to either augment the driveway for additional parking/turnaround area or to install a 250 sq. ft. shed (water oriented accessory structure) by the lake. While this is a very rough concept sketch, it illustrates one of many possible changes to the home and driveway design that could allow the applicants to meet the requirements of the approved variance. 601 Planning Commission Item January 17, 2023 Item Chair and Vice Chair Positions File No.Item No: B.1 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Applicant Present Zoning Land Use Acerage Density Applicable Regulations SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen Planning Commission motions to elect_______________________ as Chair and _________________________ as Vice-Chair." SUMMARY According to the Planning Commission Bylaws, Section 4.1-Election of Officers, at the first meeting in April of each year, the Planning Commission shall hold an organizational meeting. At this meeting, the Commission shall elect from its membership, a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson. Each member shall cast their vote for the member they wish to be chosen for Chairperson. If no one receives a majority vote, voting shall continue until one member receives the majority support. The Vice-Chairperson shall be elected from the remaining members of the same proceeding. 3602 Former Chairman Mark Von Oven was elected to City Council. While the Vice Chair acts as the Chair during the absence of the Chair, the Planning Commission need to appoint a new Chair and Vice Chair to serve until April so that there is someone to serve as backup for the current Vice Chair. A new election will be held on April 4, 2023. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 4603 Planning Commission Item January 17, 2023 Item 6621 Minnewashta Parkway: Consider a Request for Variances for the Construction of a Single-Family Home File No.2022-17 Item No: C.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Prepared By MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner Applicant Keri & Cordell Mack Present Zoning Single Family Residential District (RSF) Land Use Residential Low Density Acerage .51 Density NA Applicable Regulations Chapter 1, General Provisions Section 1-2, Rules of Construction and Definitions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances Chapter 20, Article II, Division 4. Nonconforming Uses Chapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District. Chapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” Single-Family Residential District Section 20-615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks. Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 1, Generally Section 20-908, Yard Regulations Chapter 20, Article XXIV, Division 2, Parking and Loading Section 20-1122, Access and Driveways 5604 SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen Planning Commission acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the requested 7.13 percent lot cover variance, denies the requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way, approves the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approves the requested 13- foot front yard setback variance, and approves a 1.13 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a home and patio, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision." SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a variance to place a parking area in the right-of-way, a 30-foot shoreland setback variance, a 13-foot front yard setback variance, and a 7.13 percent lot cover variance to accommodate the construction of a new home and patio. The proposed home would be setback 17 feet from the front lot line and 54 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL). The proposed patio would be setback 45 feet from the OHWL. The proposed lot cover would be 7,132 square feet. The property’s existing house is setback 22.7 feet from the front line and 52 feet from the OHWL. The existing deck is setback 40 feet from the OHWL. The exiting property has 5,800 square feet of lot cover. The requested increased to the property’s nonconformities require variances. BACKGROUND In August of 1979 the City issued a building permit for single-family home.* In October of 1998 the City issued a building permit for a new deck.* In October of 2006 the City issued a building permit for a new front porch. Several permits for maintenance and interior work are also on file with the city. *Variances were associated with these items, see attached staff report for additional information. DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting a 30-foot shoreland setback variance, 13-foot front yard setback variance, a variance to place a parking area in the right-of-way, and a 7.13 percent lot cover variance to build a new home and patio replacing an existing home and deck/patio. The existing structures encroach 35 feet into the shoreland setback, 7.3 feet into the front yard setback, and exceed the permitted lot cover by 1.13 percent. The applicant has stated that the requested setback variances are necessary due to the narrowness of the lot and observe that simply replacing the existing home would require equivalent variances. They have indicated that they are primarily proposing a new layout or the home. They have noted that the requested lot cover and parking area variances are due to the need to create a driveway configuration that includes off-street parking and a turnaround, as there is no on-street parking on Minnewashta Parkway and it is not safe to back onto the street. Finally, they have stated that they believe the proposed vegetative buffer offsets the proposed increase to the property’s lot cover. The city’s policy is to limit the spread and expansion of nonconforming structures by not granting 6605 variances to expand nonconformities, unless those variances are justified by a practical difficulty unique to the property that does not result for the owner’s design choices. In this case, the requested setback variances comply with this policy. The setback variances requested by the applicant essentially create a buildable area with approximately the same width as the existing structure and, due to the narrowness of the lot, it would not be possible to construct a home meeting the required setbacks. The applicant is shifting the building pad closer to the road, but since this shift increases the distance between the property’s impervious surfaces and the lake, staff believes this exchange of setbacks aligns with the city’s goal of providing the maximum protection possible for the city’s aquatic resources. For these reasons staff recommends approving the requested setback variances. The requested lot cover variance would expand the property’s lot cover from the current nonconforming 5,800 square feet to 7,132 square feet, a 1,332 square foot increase. As the property exceeds the city’s minimum required lot size, the parcel’s physical characteristics do not justify the proposed increase. The applicant’s implication that the requested lot cover variances are needed due to the difficulties associated with accessing Minnewashta Parkway is not supported because the existing driveway configuration should allow for vehicles exiting the property to turn around prior to entering the street and the proposed driveway is 113 square feet smaller than the existing driveway. Examining the variance request, it is clear that requested lot cover variance is the result of the applicant increasing the footprint of the house from 1,901 square feet to 3,701 square feet. Given that a two story structure can built on the lot, a home providing reasonable use can be built on the site without the requested lot cover variance. The requested variance should be understood to be the result of the size of the applicant’s proposed building size rather than any factor unique to the property. Additionally, if a larger home footprint than what is current present is desired, the applicant has the ability to reduce the size of the patio, walkway, garage portion, or driveway to facilitate a larger living area. For these reasons staff recommends denying the requested lot cover variance and requiring the applicant to build within their exiting lot cover total. While the proposed vegetative buffer does help protect the lake, it has never been the city’s policy that properties can increase their lot cover by adding buffers and/or rain gardens and there is not provision allowing for this within the city code. The proposed buffers are required due to the fact that the home does not meet the required 75-foot shoreland setback and already exceeds the city’s lot cover limit. Staff conveyed the expectation that the property not increase its existing lot cover and add buffers to address the existing nonconforming elements in pre-application conversations with the architect and cannot recommend that the variance process be used to approve increased lot cover in exchange for buffers that are already required due to the property’s existing nonconformities. Regarding the requested variance to encroach into the right-of-way, the proposed driveway would provide off-street parking for at least seven guest vehicles in addition to the property’s four garage stalls without an encroachment into the right-of-way. The requested variance would accommodate one additional guest parking space. Given the importance of maintaining an unencumbered right-of-way, the fact that the proposed driveway provides ample guest parking without the proposed encroachment into the right-of-way, and the fact that only a single parking spot is added by the proposed encroachment, staff recommends that the requested variance for a parking area within the right-of-way be denied. In summation, variances should only be granted in response to practical difficulties caused by the unique characteristics of a parcel, and only to the extent necessary to provide reasonable use of the parcel. Variance requests that have their genesis in the design choices of property owners do not meet this criteria. Reviewing the requested variances, the requested setback variances are the result of the narrowness of the property and are consistent with extent of the existing nonconformity; however, the requested lot cover and parking area variances are the result of the size of the proposed building, not any 7606 factor unique to the property. Staff believes that a home and driveway providing reasonable use of the parcel are possible without the requested lot cover and parking area variances. A full analysis can be found in the attached staff report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the requested 7.13 percent lot cover variance, deny the requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way, approve the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approve the requested 13-foot front yard setback variance, and approve a 1.13 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a home and patio, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot cover may not exceed 5,800 square feet. 2. Eaves and other awnings may project no more than 2.5 feet beyond the granted setback variance. 3. Driveway configuration must comply with Section 20-1122 of the City Code. 4. Primary structure must be setback at least 54 feet from the ordinary high water level and patio must be setback at least 45 feet from the ordinary high water level. 5. A building permit must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site and before beginning any construction on the site. 6. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 7. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 8. A permanent 10-foot native vegetated buffer with permanent buffer signs must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype. Buffer strip averaging may be used to achieve the total buffer area required. The buffer may be configured around the path and stairs. Design plans must be approved by the Water Resources Engineer. 9. A buffer agreement describing the precise location and extent of the buffer strip, as well as the restrictions for activities within the buffer strip, shall be signed by the property owner and the city and shall be recorded against the property at the county recorder's office. The property owner shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated with the buffer strip dedication. 10. The installation of any improvements on the Site shall meet all applicable jurisdictional requirements, including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and all applicable permits shall be obtained prior to any site improvements. ATTACHMENTS Staff Report Engineering Report Findings of Fact and Decision Variance Application for Development Review Narrative Plans 8607 Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions 9608 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: January 17, 2023 CC DATE: February 13, 2023 REVIEW DEADLINE: February 14, 2023 CASE #: PC 2022-17 BY: MYW SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a variance to place a parking area in the right-of-way, a 30-foot shoreland setback variance, a 13-foot front yard setback variance, and a 7.13 percent lot cover variance to accommodate the construction of a new home and patio. The proposed home would be setback 17 feet from the front lot line and 54 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL). The proposed patio would be setback 45 feet from the OHWL. The proposed lot cover would be 7,132 square feet. The property’s existing house is setback 22.7 feet from the front line and 52 feet from the OHWL. The existing deck is setback 40 feet from the OHWL. The exiting property has 5,800 square feet of lot cover. The requested increased to the property’s nonconformities require variances. LOCATION:6621 Minnewashta Pkwy APPLICANT:Keri and Cordell Mack 6621 Minnewashta Pkwy Excelsior, MN 55331 PRESENT ZONING: “PUDR” –Planned Unit Development: Residential District 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density ACREAGE:.51 acres DENSITY: NA LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION- MAKING: The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the requested 7.13 percent lot cover variance, denies the requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way, approves the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approves the requested 13-foot front yard setback variance, and approves a 1.13 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a home and patio, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.” 10609 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a 30-foot shoreland setback variance, 13-foot front yard setback variance, a variance to place a parking area in the right-of-way, and a 7.13 percent lot cover variance to build a new home and patio replacing an existing home and deck/patio. The existing structures encroach 35 feet into the shoreland setback, 7.3 feet into the front yard setback, and exceed the permitted lot cover by 1.13 percent. The applicant has stated that the requested setback variances are necessary due to the narrowness of the lot and observe that simply replacing the existing home would require equivalent variances. They have indicated that they are primarily proposing a new layout or the home. They have noted that the requested lot cover and parking area variances are due to the need to create a driveway configuration that includes off-street parking and a turnaround, as there is no on-street parking on Minnewashta Parkway and it is not safe to back onto the street. Finally, they have stated that they believe the proposed vegetative buffer offsets the proposed increase to the property’s lot cover. The city’s policy is to limit the spread and expansion of nonconforming structures by not granting variances to expand nonconformities, unless those variances are justified by a practical difficulty unique to the property that does not result for the owner’s design choices. In this case, the requested setback variances comply with this policy. The setback variances requested by the applicant essentially create a buildable area with approximately the same width as the existing structure and, due to the narrowness of the lot, it would not be possible to construct a home meeting the required setbacks. The applicant is shifting the building pad closer to the road, but since this shift increases the distance between the property’s impervious surfaces and the lake, staff believes this exchange of setbacks aligns with the city’s goal of providing the maximum protection possible for the city’s aquatic resources. For these reasons staff recommends approving the requested setback variances. The requested lot cover variance would expand the property’s lot cover from the current nonconforming 5,800 square feet to 7,132 square feet, a 1,332 square foot increase. As the property exceeds the city’s minimum required lot size, the parcel’s physical characteristics do not justify the proposed increase. The applicant’s implication that the requested lot cover variances are needed due to the difficulties associated with accessing Minnewashta Parkway is not supported because the existing driveway configuration should allow for vehicles exiting the property to turn around prior to entering the street and the proposed driveway is 113 square feet smaller than the existing driveway. Examining the variance request, it is clear that requested lot cover variance is the result of the applicant increasing the footprint of the house from 1,901 square feet to 3,701 square feet. Given that a two story structure can built on the lot, a home providing reasonable use can be built on the site without the requested lot cover variance. The requested variance should be understood to be the result of the size of the applicant’s proposed building size rather than any factor unique to the property. Additionally, if a larger home footprint than what is currently present is desired, the applicant has the ability to reduce the size of the patio, walkway, garage portion, or driveway to facilitate a larger living area. For these reasons staff recommends denying the requested lot cover variance and requiring the applicant to build within their exiting lot cover total. 11610 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 3 While the proposed vegetative buffer does help protect the lake, it has never been the city’s policy that properties can increase their lot cover by adding buffers and/or rain gardens and there is not provision allowing for this within the city code. The proposed buffers are required due to the fact that the home does not meet the required 75-foot shoreland setback and already exceeds the city’s lot cover limit. Staff conveyed the expectation that the property not increase its existing lot cover and add buffers to address the existing nonconforming elements in pre-application conversations with the architect and cannot recommend that the variance process be used to approve increased lot cover in exchange for buffers that are already required due to the property’s existing nonconformities. Regarding the requested variance to encroach into the right-of-way, the proposed driveway would provide off-street parking for at least 7 guest vehicles in addition to the property’s four garage stalls without an encroachment into the right-of-way. The requested variance would accommodate 1 additional guest parking space. Given the importance of maintaining an unencumbered right-of-way, the fact that the proposed driveway provides ample guest parking without the proposed encroachment into the right-of-way, and the fact that only a single parking spot is added by the proposed encroachment, staff recommends that the requested variance for a parking area within the right-of-way be denied. In summation, variances should only be granted in response to practical difficulties caused by the unique characteristics of a parcel, and only to the extent necessary to provide reasonable use of the parcel. Variance requests that have their genesis in the design choices of property owners do not meet this criteria. Reviewing the requested variances, the requested setback variances are the result of the narrowness of the property and are consistent with extent of the existing nonconformity; however, the requested lot cover and parking area variances are the result of the size of the proposed building, not any factor unique to the property. Staff believes that a home and driveway providing reasonable use of the parcel are possible without the requested lot cover and parking area variances. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 1, General Provisions Section 1-2, Rules of Construction and Definitions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances Chapter 20, Article II, Division 4. Nonconforming Uses Chapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District. Chapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” Single-Family Residential District Section 20-615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks. Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 1, Generally Section 20-908, Yard Regulations Chapter 20, Article XXIV, Division 2, Parking and Loading Section 20-1122, Access and Driveways 12611 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 4 BACKGROUND In August of 1979 the City issued a building permit for single-family home.* In October of 1998 the City issued a building permit for a new deck.* In October of 2006 the City issued a building permit for a new front porch. Several permits for maintenance and interior work are also on file with the city. *Variances were associated with these items. See discussion on neighborhood variances for additional information. SITE CONSTRAINTS Zoning Overview The property is zoned Planned Unit Development: Residential District (PUDR) and is located within the Shoreland Management District with lake frontage. The table below shows what is required by the zoning code, what is currently present on the property, and what is being proposed by the applicant. Ordinance Existing Proposed Zoning PUDR PUDR PUDR Lot Area 20,000 22,194 22,194 Front Yard Setback 30*22.7*17 Side Yard Setback 10 10 10 Shoreland Setback 75 52 (house)/ 40 (Deck/Patio)** 54 (house)/45 (Patio) Hard Surface Coverage 25% (5,000 SF)26.13% (5,800 SF)32.13% (7,132) Lot Frontage 90 Feet 90 Feet 90 Feet Lot Depth 125 115 115 Structure Height 35 Feet Unknown 30’ Water Oriented Structure 250 Square Feet None None Driveway Setback 5’***3’3’ *Ordinance allows homes built prior to February 19, 1987 to have an open porch with a 20 foot front yard setback. **28 foot setback variance granted for deck. Unclear why it was built with 40 foot shoreland setback rather than 47 foot shoreland setback. ***Driveways must maintain a ten foot setback for first 20 feet of length after which they can reduce the setback down to 5 feet. The City Engineer can also approve a 5 foot setback for the entire driveway length. 13612 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 5 Bluff Creek Corridor This is not encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Bluff Protection There are no bluffs on the property. Floodplain Overlay Portions of the eastern edges of the property appear to be within the AE Flood Zone (One percent annual flood chance, shown in yellow) and the 500 year flood zone (shown in red); however, no portion of the proposed project will take place within those areas. Shoreland Management The property is located within the Shoreland Management District and is riparian. This district requires a 75-foot structure setback from the lake’s ordinary high-water level and limits the property to a maximum impervious surface coverage of 25 percent. It also requires 90 feet of lot width and a minimum 20,000 square feet of lot area. Wetland Protection There is not a wetland located in the project area. NEIGHBORHOOD Minnewashta Creek/Pleasant Acres Most of the parcels between Minnewashta Parkway and Lake Minnewashta were created as part of the Pleasant Acres subdivison in 1957 or the Minnewashta Creek 1st Addition in 1976, though the northern most two parcels were created in 1992 as part of the Washta Bay Court subdivision. Changes in the zoning code and OHWL have created nonconformties and neccesitated variances for many of the properties in the older subdivions and most of the homes were constructed in the 1970s or 1980s. 14613 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 6 Variances within 500 feet: 3801 Leslee Curve (PC 2016-14): Accessory structures over 1,000 sq. ft. (shed) – Denied 6541 Minnewashta Pkwy (PC 1993-02): 30’ stream setback (house) - Approved 6601 Minnewashta Pkwy (PC 1977-24): Lot under 20,000 sq. ft. (house) – Approved* (PC 1997-10): 13’ shoreland setback (deck) – Approved** 6621 Minnewashta Pkwy (PC 1977-24): Lot under 20,000 sq. ft. (house) – Approved* (PC 1998-9): 28’ shoreland setback (deck) – Approved** 6641 Minnewashta Pkwy (PC 1992-10): 6’ lake setback (deck and addition) - Approved (PC 2019-10): 6’ side yard setback, 3% lot cover (garage) - Approved *Note: It appears that lot area calculated only included the portions of these lots west of the survey pins located between 49 and 30 feet from the OHWL in force at that time. The exclusion of these areas lead to the properties needing a variance for not meeting the required 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size for parcels within the shoreland overlay district. Staff is uncertain as to why this area was excluded from the total. If the area east of the pins was not part of the lots, they would not be riparian lots and they would have met the required 15,000 square foot lot area for non-riparian properties, but needed a lot depth variance due to not meeting the required 125-foot lot minimum lot depth. There is also a note in the staff report showing a proposed home site meeting the 75-foot shoreland setback measured from the OHWL at the far east of the properties. In any event, when the entire property is included in the calculationsboth lots meet the minimum 20,000 sq. ft. lot area requirement and variance 1977-24 is unnecessary. **Note: It appears that in 1976 when these lots were created the OHWL was 943.5 and that subsequent changes in the lake level have resulted in a current OHWL of 944.5. This change in OHWL had the effect of reducing the home’s setback from the lake and created the non-conforming shoreland setback. It should be noted that variance 1998-9 was approved because the proposed deck expansion maintained the existing deck’s shoreland setback and that variance 1997-10 was approved because the proposed deck maintained the existing deck’s shoreland setback. ANALYSIS Lot Cover Throughout the city lot cover is regulated in order to control the amount of stormwater generated by properties and ensure minimum amounts of greenspace are present. Lot cover also serves to indirectly limit the size of structures on parcels as property owners must balance home size, driveway configuration, patios, sheds, and other accessory structures to ensure the totals fall within the permitted lot cover limits. The city’s shoreland overlay district limits the maximum amount of lot cover within 1,000 feet of lakes to 25 percent of a property’s lot area. 15614 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 7 Due to the importance of limiting stormwater and maintaining greenspace, especially on riparian parcels where runoff has the highest likelihood of contributing to lowering the quality of the city’s aquatic resources, the city’s policy has been to only grant lot cover variances in situations where the proposed lot cover is less than or equal to the amount of existing nonconforming lot cover. The one exception to this is in cases where the parcel is substandard to the extent that the lot cover permitted by the city code would not allow for reasonable use, in which case the minimum lot cover variance necessary to permit reasonable use is supported. This policy was conveyed to the applicant’s architects during initial consultations on the variance request. In all cases where a property has nonconforming lot cover, a substandard lot size, or nonconforming shoreland setbacks and variances are requested, thecity requires that vegetative buffers be established. The establishment of these buffers is intended to mitigate the continuation of the existing nonconformities, and should not be understood offset requested increases to a property’s lot cover. The city code does not provide a mechanism for homeowners to offset increased lot cover by installing additional buffering or rain gardens, nor should the variance process be used to approve such exchanges on a piecemeal basis. In this case, the applicant has a nonconforming lot cover of 5,800 square feet on a 22,194 square foot lot which results in 26.13 percent lot cover. They are proposing increasing this lot cover to 7,132 square feet which would result in 32.13 percent lot cover, a six percent increase. The applicant states in their narrative that the primary motivation for this variance request is the need to accommodate off street parking and turnaround areas as part of their driveway configuration. They indicate that Minnewashta Parkway’s high traffic speed, volume of traffic and lack of on-street parking necessitate the requested driveway configuration and associated lot cover, and that the increased lot cover is offset by the proposed vegetative buffer and rain gardens. At the end of their narrative they state that rebuilding the existing home would require substantiallysimilar variances. 16615 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 8 When evaluating the variance request, it is clear that the increase in lot cover is the result not of the proposed driveway and parking areas but rather of the proposed increase to the footprint of the existing home. As the table to the right shows, the proposed driveway is actually 113 square feet smaller than the existing driveway and that the size of all existing features of the property, save the building footprint have been reduced. The applicant is proposing nearly doubling the footprint of the existing home and the additional 1,800 square feet of lot cover associated with this request is responsible for the proposed 1,332 square foot increase in the property’s existing lot cover. It should also be noted that it is not clear why the property’s existing “doughnut” shaped driveway requires the applicant to back out onto Minnewashta Parkway. These type of driveway configurations are used because they allow for drivers to circle the open area or otherwise maneuver a vehicle to facilitate pulling forward into the street, essentially they provide a turnaround. Even if a circumstance that staff is unaware of prevents the use of this particular driveway in that manner, the applicant’s proposal shows that a driveway they believe to be viable which also provides a large amount of off street parking can be created while reducing the amount of property covered by driveway area. In short, the practical difficulties associated with the site’s access off of a collector are not related to the requested lot cover variance. The other factor that may justify a lot cover variance are if the lot is too small to allow for reasonable use. The city’s lot cover limits are presumed to provide sufficient lot cover for reasonable use so long as a property meets the minimum size for its zoning district. As the table to the right shows, properties guided for low density residential development meeting the various zoning district’s minimum lot sizes are expected to be able to accommodate a home and accessory uses with lot cover totals ranging from 3,150 square feet to 5,000 square feet. The applicant’s parcel has an area of 22,194 square feet and has a nonconforming lot cover of 5,800 square feet. This means they already have 800 square feet of lot cover beyond the minimum threshold created by the zoning code for a riparian single-family lot and 251 square feet beyond the 5,549 square feet they are allowed under the city code. It is difficult to take the position that circumstances unique to the propertyprevent reasonable use without a lot 17616 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 9 cover variance when the property exceeds its district’s minimum lot size and already has nonconforming lot cover over what would typically be permitted. The last question to be addressed is if the requested 7,132 square feet of lot cover is needed for reasonable use. Comparing the size of the applicant’s proposed home to the typical size and configuration of the neighborhood’s homes can be helpful in determining if what is being proposed is necessary for the applicant to have reasonable use of the property. In this case the existing homes between Minnewashta Parkway and Lake Minnewashta have 2 or 3 stall garages, whereas the applicant is proposing a 1,136 square foot 4 car garage. The city code establishes a two-car garage as the minimum requirement for properties and there are many properties in the city that simply cannot accommodate a 4 car garage due to the lot cover required for a 4th stall and associated driveway access, for this reason most new construction in the city features three car garages. Surveying real estate listings, the average listed livable area for the area’s homes is a little under 2,500 square feet, compared to the 4,588 square feet of livable area the applicant is proposing. To provide some context, the average size of a new home in the United States as reported by the American Home Index in 2021 was 2,480 square feet, and the Zillow listing for the applicant’s existing home states that it has 3,157 square feet of living area. The city code requires a minimum home size of 960 square feet and while the city has never taken the position that properties requesting lot cover variances should be limited to homes of that size, the property’s existing home, which could be rebuilt without the requested lot cover variance, is significantly larger than the minimum required and larger than the average size of new home and the average size of the surrounding homes. Given the above information, a home consistent with or even larger than what is currentlypresent in the neighborhood could be constructed without the requested lot cover variance, especially since some of the property’s existing lot cover could be repurposed to facilitate a larger home without a lot cover variance. For example, under the current proposal portions of the front porch, driveway, walkway, rear patio totaling 486 square feet were removed to partially offset the proposed 1,800 square foot increase in building footprint. This would provide the applicant with a 2,387 square foot footprint (1,901 square-foot existing plus 486 square feet currently proposed for removal) for the construction of a new home without the need for a lot cover variance beyond the existing nonconforming lot cover. If the applicant felt that alarger building footprint was necessary, the proposed patio, walkway, or even driveway could theoretically be further reduced to accommodate a larger building footprint. Ultimately, the applicant’s requested lot cover variance is the result of the proposed 3,701 square foot home footprint and not of any unique constraint imposed by the parcel or Minnewashta Parkway. Reasonable use is possible within the 5,800 square feet of existing lot cover and staff recommends denying the requested lot cover variance. 18617 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 10 Shoreland Setback The city’s shoreland ordinance establishes a 75-foot structure setback in order to prevent the installation of lot cover near ecologically sensitive areas, create separation between structures and the lakeshore, and provides for a consistent visual aesthetic for riparian properties. Due to the important role that this setback plays in protecting the quality of the city’s lakes and the potential for these variances to impact both the neighboring properties and all users of the city’s lakes, the city has historically been very hesitant to grant shoreland setback variances. When properties with existing nonconforming shoreland setbacks apply for variances to expand, staff has always recommended that the expansion be required to maintain the existing lake setback. In this case, the existing home has a nonconforming 52-foot setback from the OHWL and the existing deck with patio underneath is setback 40 feet from the OHWL. The applicant had initially proposed a house with a 45-foot setback from the OHWL and terrace with 36- foot setback; however, in response to staff feedback they shifted the proposed home forward so that it would have a 54-foot setback from the OHWL and the patio would have a 45-foot setback from the OHWL. This revision lead to the proposal increasing the home’s shoreland setback by 2 feet and the deck/patio’s shoreland setback by 5 feet. As this is a reduction to the exiting nonconforming setback the requested variance is consistent with both the nonconforming use ordinance and the city’s policy for granting shoreland setback variances. Staff would also like to note that the requested setback variance is justified by the practical difficulties associated with this parcel and is broadly in line with the 28-foot setback variance previously granted for the property’s deck. Due to the fact that the parcel is fairly shallow with a depth of 115 feet at its narrowest point the interaction of the 75-foot shoreland setback and 30-foot front yard setback provide an unworkably constrained buildable area. While portions of the home could be narrowed to reduce the required setback variance, the propsed 53 wide buildable area created by the requsted shoreland and front yard setbacks is identical to the 53 wide area occupied by the existing home and deck. 19618 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 11 For these reasons staff support the requested shoreland setback variance. Front Setback The intent of the city’s required 30-foot front yard setback is to ensure that neighborhoods have a consistent aesthetic (i.e. greenspace along road corridors and consistent siting of building pads) and that there is adequate driveway length to accommodate off-street parking. The property currently has a 22.7-foot front yard setback which is permitted due to a provision in the city code that allows homes built prior to February 19, 1987 to have an open deck encroaching up to 10 feet into the required 30-foot front yard setback. The applicant is proposing a 17-foot front yard setback which would require a 13-foot front yard setback variance. Typically, staff would not support reducing a front yard setback below 20 feet as this distance is generally required to ensure a long enough driveway to accommodate off street parking and the desired greenspace and neighborhood character along road corridors. This goal of maintaining a minimum 20-foot setback is evidenced by the fact that the open porch provision for older homes still requires a 20-foot setback and that residential zoning districts with reduced front yard setbacks typically establish a 25-foot setback with 5 feet of allowed encroachments for open porches, patios, and decks. In this case, the applicant is proposing utilizing a side loading garage. This garage configuration means that the driveway can accommodate off-street parking on the driveway area to the side of the house in front of the garage, rather than exclusively on the driveway area between the front plane of the structure and the right-of-way line. For this reason, homes with side loading garages are better able to provide adequate off-street parking with reduced front yard setbacks. Additionally, the curve in this section of Minnewashta Parkway and variations in the width of its unimproved right-of-way (i.e. the distance from curb to property line ranges from 20 feet at the southwest corner of the property to 11 feet and the northwest corner) mean that differences in the front yard setbacks of the structures to the east of this section of the road are less apparent as the neighborhood does not present a uniform line of houses. This means that many of the aesthetic concerns that factor into requiring uniform front yard setbacks are not applicable to this parcel. As was noted in the discussion of the property’s shoreland setback, this property is unique in that it has a pinch point where the width drops to approximately 115 feet and applying both the 75- foot shoreland setback and 30-foot front yard setback to that section provides a buildable area of only 10 feet. In order to provide reasonable use, variances from these setbacks are required and during initial consultations with the applicant’s architect staff indicated a strong preference for 20619 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 12 minimizing the requested variance from the shoreland setback even if it meant shifting the proposed structure closer to the road. The proposed front yard setback is the result of the applicant shifting the building forward from their initial proposal in order to increase the non- conforming shoreland setback. Given the use of a side loading garage, the existing characteristics of the neighborhood, the narrowness of the lot, and the importance of maintaining the greatest setback practicable from the lake, staff supports the requested front yard setback variance. Parking Area in Right-of-Way Sec 20-1122 Access And Driveways Subsection (d) 6 states: For all lots, no portion of the right-of-way may be paved except that portion used for the driveway. Subsection (d) 4 states: For A-2, PUD-R for single-family detached houses, RR, RSF, R-4 and RLM for single-family detached residential uses, the width of the driveway access shall not exceed 24 feet at the right- of-way line. The applicant is requesting a variance to place a portion of their driveway within the right-of- way to serve as a parking area. The city code does not permit any area of the right-of-way, save the portion used for driveway access, to be paved and limits driveways to a maxim width of 24 feet at the right-of-way line. The reason for these policies is to limit the amount of impervious surface located within the right-of- way and ensure that the right-of-way is clear and unobstructed so that it can be used for its intended functions (i.e. staging area for street work, utility location and staging, small utilities, etc.). An additional concern is the aesthetic impact of replacing green boulevard areas with paved surfaces and private parking areas within residential districts. Bringing the proposal into compliance with city code would have the impact of removing one of the four shown guest spaces which would still provide the applicant with dedicated space for three guest vehicles plus four potential spaces in front of the garage and the four garage stalls. Additional guest vehicles could also be accommodated on other sections of the driveway. As a point of comparison, a typical residential driveway in the city can accommodate the off-street parking of four to six cars in addition to the available garage stalls. 21620 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 13 In any event, the applicant’s proposed 2,539 square-foot driveway could easily accommodate a minimum of seven off-street guest parking spaces without a variance and the applicant has not provided any justification for why an additional spot is needed to have reasonable use of the parcel. Given the city’s interest in maintaining an open and unobstructed right-of-way and the ability of the applicant to add all but one of the proposed dedicated guest parking spaces without placing the proposed parking area within the right-of-way, staff recommends that the requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way. Impact on Neighborhood The homes between Lake Minnewashta and Minnewashta parkway are generally older with seven of the nine being built prior to 1990. Four of the properties have received at least one variance and it is likely that some of the other parcels have non-conforming elements. Given that many of the homes in this area are approaching the age where owners may be considering remodels, additions, or rebuilding, staff believes that this variance, the first for a rebuild in the area, will shape expectations for reasonable use and precedence. For this reason, staff is very appreciative of the applicant’s willingness to maintain the existing shoreland setback, but is concerned that the requested lot cover variance accommodates a driveway and house footprint that exceed what is necessary for reasonable use. Granting the lot cover variance necessary to allow the applicant to increase their existing home footprint from 1,901 square feet to 3,701 square feet while maintaining an approximately 2,500 square-foot driveway would establish the expectation that homes and driveways of the size proposed by the applicant are necessary for reasonable use of these sites, regardless of the constrains composed by the city’s lot cover limits. This would result in a much more intensely developed neighborhood (in terms of the total lot cover and the size of structures) than is currently present or would be permitted by the zoning code. Additionally, the proposed parking area within the right-of-way would be an uncommon feature both within the city and the immediate neighborhood. With the exception of one property, the existing homes appear to have turnarounds and parking areas located behind the right-of-way line, though some nonconforming driveways with multiple access points also exist. Establishing that the lack of on-street parking justifies private parking areas within the right-of-way could significantly alter the character of the neighborhood if other properties followed suite and paved portions of the right-of-way to accommodate visitor parking. 22621 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 14 In order to avoid establishing the expectation that lot cover variances will be granted to accommodate house and driveway footprints beyond what would typically be allowed under the city code and to maintain the clear and unencumbered nature of the city’s right-of-way, staff recommends that the lot cover and parking area variances be denied. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the requested 7.13 percent lot cover variance, deny the requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way, approve the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approve the requested 13-foot front yard setback variance, and approve a 1.13 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a home and patio, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot cover may not exceed 5,800 square feet. 2. Eaves and other awnings may project no more than 2.5 feet beyond the granted setback variance. 3. Driveway configuration must comply with Section 20-1122 of the City Code. 4. Primary structure must be setback at least 54 feet from the ordinary high water level and patio must be setback at least 45 feet from the ordinary high water level. 5. A building permit must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site and before beginning any construction on the site. 6. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review 7. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 8. A permanent 10 - foot native vegetated buffer with permanent buffer signs must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype. Buffer strip averaging may be used to achieve the total buffer area required. The buffer may be configured around the path and stairs. Design plans must be approved by the Water Resources Engineer. 9. A buffer agreement describing the precise location and extent of the buffer strip, as well as the restrictions for activities within the buffer strip, shall be signed by the property owner and the city and shall be recorded against the property at the county recorder's office. The property owner shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated with the buffer strip dedication. 10. The installation of any improvements on the Site shall meet all applicable jurisdictional requirements, including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and all applicable permits shall be obtained prior to any site improvements. 23622 6621 Minnewashta Parkway January 17, 2023 Page 15 ATTACHMENTS 1. ENG/WRE Memo 2. Findings of Fact and Decision (Partial Approval) 3. Variance Document 4. Development Review Application 5. Narrative 6. Plans (Proposed) 7. Survey (Existing) 8. Survey (Proposed) g:\plan\2022 planning cases\22-17 6621 minnewashta parkway\staff report_6621 minnewashta_var.docx 24623 Memorandum To:Olivia Adomabea, Community Development Intern From:Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer CC: Charles Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer George Bender, Assistant City Engineer Steve Lenz, Engineering Technician III Date:1/6/2023 Re:Variance Review at 6621 Minnewashta Parkway – Planning Case #2022-17 The Engineering and Water Resources Departments have reviewed the variance submittal for 6621 Minnewashta Parkway. These comments are divided into two categories: general comments and proposed conditions. General comments are informational points to guide the applicant in the proper planning for this project, to inform the applicant of possible extraordinary issues and/or to provide the basis for findings. Proposed conditions are requirements that Engineering and Water Resources recommends be formally imposed on the application in the final order. Note that references to the “City Standards” herein refer to the City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. General Comments/Findings 1. Any and all plans submitted with this application have been reviewed only for the purpose of determining the feasibility of the project based on the variance(s) requested and that the proposal is in accordance with City Standards. A recommendation of variance approval does not constitute final approval of details, including but not limited to alignments, materials and points of access, utility connections or discharge, that are depicted or suggested in the application. The applicant is required to submit detailed construction drawings for the project, as applicable. The City of Chanhassen Engineering and Water Resources Departments will review plans, in detail, when they are submitted and approve, reject or require modifications to the plans or drawings based upon conformance with City 25624 Standards, the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances, the final order of the Variance determination(s), and the professional engineering judgment of the City Engineer. 2. It is the opinion of the Engineering and Water Resources Departments that the proposed variances can be developed in accordance with the requirements of the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances (as it pertains to Engineering and Public Works requirements) and City Standards, provided it fully addresses the comments and conditions contained herein and can be approved. 3. The applicant is requesting a shoreland setback, front yard setback, and lot cover variance in order to demolish an existing house and reconstruct a new single-family home on the property. 4. The proposed house and grading plans provided by the applicant and drafted by Sathre- Berquist, Inc., dated December 16, 2022, illustrates a proposed driveway that encroaches into the driveway side yard setback as defined by Sec. 20-1122(a) of City Ordinance. Ordinance requires that driveways shall meet the zoning district’s required side yard setback for the first 20 feet of the driveway measured from the front property line. The property is zoned Residential Single Family and would require a driveway side yard setback of 10 feet for the first 20 feet; after the first 20 feet the setback can be reduced to 5 feet. However, as the existing driveway’s side yard setback is approximately 5 feet for the first 20 feet, and because Sec. 20-1122(3)f. allows for the city engineer to administratively approve on a case-by-case basis a minimum 5-foot side yard setback for the entirety of the driveway without the need for a variance, the applicant shall maintain a 5-foot driveway side yard setback for the entirety of the driveway. See proposed condition 1. 5. The applicant’s narrative dated December 16, 2022, states: “The city engineer requested the removal of the existing turn-around in the driveway…”. This is not correct as the Engineering Department provided preliminary comments to the applicant on November 29, 2022 that a turnaround would be required, and per Sec. 20-1122(d)(8) a turnaround is required for all driveways entering onto a collector roadway such as Minnewashta Parkway. The need for turnarounds on highways, county roads and collector roads, which typically have higher volumes and speeds than local residential streets, is required in order to eliminate the need for vehicles to back out. As indicated in the narrative by the applicant, backing out onto Minnewashta Parkway is a safety concern. Constructing the required turnaround in such a manor to eliminate the need to back-out will be required. See proposed condition 2. 6. The proposed house and grading plans illustrate a parking pad attached to the driveway that encroaches into the right-of-way. No portion of the right-of-way may be paved except that portion used for the driveway’s ingress/egress in accordance with Sec. 20-1122(d)(6). Furthermore, the city strives to maintain the rights-of-way within the city free of unnecessary encumbrances as outlined under Article 17-V of City Ordinance. This ensures 26625 the integrity of our streets and the appropriate use of the right-of-way (to benefit the public). See proposed condition 3. 7. The existing home extends into the shoreland setback area by approximately 23 feet. The proposed home extends into the shoreland setback area by approximately 30 feet which increases the non-conformity of the home by 7 feet. The existing home has a footprint of approximately 1,900 square feet and the property in its existing condition has approximately 5,800 square feet of impervious area. The proposed home has a footprint of approximately 3,700 square feet and the proposed site layout shows approximately 7,100 square feet of impervious area. The result is an increase in impervious area of the property by approximately 1,300 square feet. 8. There are no existing stormwater best management practices (BMPs) onsite or downstream of the site. As a result, stormwater leaving the property is not treated before it discharges directly into Lake Minnewashta. The proposed increase in impervious area could result in additional pollutants (including phosphorous and suspended solids) entering into Lake Minnewashta which could negatively impact water quality along with adding additional stormwater runoff volume. The City of Chanhassen’s Local Surface Water Management Plan Policy 2.14 reads: “Protect shorelands and water resources. All properties are required to have native vegetated buffer adjacent to wetlands, storm ponds, and water resources. Non- conforming properties, and lots of record shall be brought into compliance when applying for permits or variances to improve the property. Non-conforming buffers should attempt to meet regulatory requirements whenever possible. The minimum non-conforming buffer width shall be 10 feet.” City Ordinance - Shoreland Management District Section 20-490 states: In evaluating all variances, zoning and building permit applications, or conditional use requests, the zoning authority shall require the property owner to address, when appropriate, stormwater runoff management, reducing impervious surfaces, increasing setback, restoration of wetlands, vegetative buffers, sewage treatment and water supply capabilities, and other conservation-designed actions. 9. The applicant’s proposed design shows stormwater best management practices (BMPs) including a native shoreland buffer area 10 feet in width and two small rain gardens. No design calculations or vegetation plans were submitted as part of the variance. The proposed BMPs would help treat stormwater and assist to mitigate impacts from the 27626 construction and increase in impervious area in the proposed plan if designed, installed, and properly maintained. As such the applicant shall submit a revised design and vegetation plan including permanent buffer markers and an agreement with the city for the BMP’s permanent establishment and maintenance. See conditions 4 and 5. 10. Stormwater volume and water quality are not the only reasons for the lot cover regulations defined in City Ordinance. As such, the construction of stormwater BMPs should not be traded for additional lot cover as suggested to in the applicant’s variance narrative. It should also be noted that the setback variance and building permit will trigger section 20- 490 of City Ordinance which outlines the buffer and stormwater management requirements of the site. The intent of this section of City Ordinance and the related policy 2.14 in the Local Surface Water Management Plan are to protect water resources and bring older sites into compliance as redevelopment occurs. 11. The applicant is proposing a shoreland setback variance of 30 feet and a lot cover variance of approximately 1,300 square feet or an increase of 7.1%. The proposed variance request would create a structure setback of approximately 45 feet from the ordinary high-water level of Lake Minnewashta. The required setback per Ordinance from the ordinary high- water level in the Shoreland Management District is 75 feet. The applicant justifies that the setback and lot cover variances are needed to build the home because of the constrained site and the need for safe access. Staff disagrees that the lot is constrained to the point that variances in excess of the existing condition are required. There appears to be sufficient area to build a new home which could be reconfigured to meet the lot cover requirements in City Ordinance and solve the issues outlined by the applicant. For example, the garage and house footprint could be reduced in size to accommodate a turnaround and meet the existing shoreline setback and 25% lot cover requirement. The size and layout of the new home and driveway are design choices by the applicant. As such, staff does not support the variance request. At a minimum, the shoreland setback should be maintained at the existing 52 foot home setback and the proposed plan should be modified to maintain the existing condition impervious area. If the variance is ultimately approved by the Planning Commission, Policy 2.14 of the Local Surface Water Management Plan and City Ordinance should be applied to create permanent native buffers and other practices as needed to protect downstream water resources and mitigate impacts of the proposed home construction. See condition 4. Lastly, while Water Resources is not in support of the proposed variance, any and all improvements on the Site must meet applicable jurisdictional requirements. See proposed condition 6. Proposed Conditions 28627 1. The applicant shall maintain a 5-foot driveway setback for the entirety of the driveway in accordance with Sec. 20-1122(a)(3)f. of City Ordinance. 2. The applicant shall provide for construction of a driveway turnaround with the building permit for review and approval by the city engineer in accordance with Sec. 20- 1122(d)(8). 3. No portion of the public right-of-way shall be paved except that portion used for the driveway’s ingress/egress in accordance with Sec. 20-1122(d)(6). 4. A permanent 10 - foot native vegetated buffer with permanent buffer signs must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype. Buffer strip averaging may be used to achieve the total buffer area required. The buffer may be configured around the path and stairs. Design plans must be approved by the Water Resources Engineer. 5. A buffer agreement describing the precise location and extent of the buffer strip, as well as the restrictions for activities within the buffer strip, shall be signed by the property owner and the city and shall be recorded against the property at the county recorder's office. The property owner shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated with the buffer strip dedication. 6. The installation of any improvements on the Site shall meet all applicable jurisdictional requirements, including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and all applicable permits shall be obtained prior to any site improvements. 29628 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (PARTIAL APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of Keri and Cordell Mack for a variance to place a parking area within the right-of-way, a shoreland setback variance, a front yard setback variance, and a lot cover variance to facilitate the construction of a home and patio on a property zoned Planed Unit Development: Residential District (PUDR) – Planning Case 2022-17. On January 17, 2023, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development: Residential District. 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 2, Minnewashta Creek First Addition 3. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding:Accommodating the reasonable use of substandard and nonconforming parcels is in harmony with the intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan; however, Section 20-71 the city code states the intention of the nonconforming use code is to prevent the enlargement and expansion of nonconforming structures and to encourage the eventual elimination of the nonconformity. The applicant’s prosed increase to the property’s lot cover represents a significant increase to a nonconformity and is not consistent with intent of the city code. The applicant’s request for a driveway parking area within the right-of-way is not consistent city’s right-of-way ordinance’s stated intent in section 17-71 of keeping the right-of-way free from unnecessary encumbrances. The applicant’s requested front yard and shoreland setback variances are consistent with city’s policy of allowing structures to maintain their existing nonconforming setbacks, and 30629 2 the city code’s goal of providing a viable building pad for property’s zoned for single-family residential use. b.When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The applicant has the ability construct a viable driveway and reasonably sized house with typical amenities without exceeding the property’s existing lot cover. Granting a variance allowing the applicant to maintain the existing nonconforming lot cover provides reasonable use. The proposed driveway configuration would provide off-street parking for at least seven guest vehicles without the requested variance. This is a sufficient amount of off-street parking to provide reasonable use, and denying the requested variance to place a parking area in the right-of-way would remove a single dedicated guest space. The proposed width of the home and patio is broadly consistent with the width of the existing structure, and the narrowness of the lot does not allow for a reasonable home configuration meeting required shoreland and front yard setbacks. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding:The requested front yard and shoreland setback variances are the result of the parcel’s narrowness not providing a viable buildable area. The constraints posed by the parcel’s width are unique to the property and were not created by the landowner. The parcel is larger than the minimum lot size required by its zoning district and the parcel already benefits from having a nonconforming lot cover above what would be permitted by the city’s zoning code. The requested lot cover and parking area variances are not the result of any factor unique to the parcel, but rather are due to the size and configuration of the house and driveway proposed by the applicant. A more modestly sized home would fit on the parcel while allowing for a driveway configuration providing safe street access without increasing the property’s lot cover beyond the existing nonconforming amount. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The applicant is requesting a lot cover variance to accommodate the construction of a relatively large home on parcel that exceeds the city’s minimum lot area requirements. The 31630 3 city’s longstanding policy has been to require property’s with nonconforming lot cover to maintain their existing lot cover, unless the applicant demonstrates that the existing lot cover and substandard size of the parcel do not provide reasonable use. This policy help to prevent the overcrowding of lots by limiting the size of homes and their accessory uses and encouraging homeowners to design homes that work within the constraints created by their property. With regards to this neighborhood many homes are older and could potentially be replaced or expanded in the near future. As this is the first proposed rebuild in this area, the variance granted here will be used by other nearby property owners as a guide for what they can reasonably expect the city to approve. Granting this variance and switching from a policy of maintaining the existing nonconforming lot cover to permitting new construction to increase lot cover would significantly alter the character of the neighborhood by increasing the amount of lot cover present in the shoreland overlay district and allowing the construction of larger footprint homes with more accessory structures. Increased lot cover has the potential to negatively impact the quality of the lake by causing increased runoff and reducing the amount of greenspace present to slow down and absorb the runoff. f. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 4.The planning report #2022-17, dated January 17, 2023, prepared by MacKenzie Young- Walters is incorporated herein. DECISION The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the requested 7.13 percent lot cover variance, denies the requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way, approves the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approves the requested 13-foot front yard setback variance, and approves a 1.13 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a home and patio, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot cover may not exceed 5,800 square feet. 2. Eaves and other awnings may project no more than 2.5 feet beyond the granted setback variance. 3. Driveway configuration must comply with Section 20-1122 of the City Code. 4. Primary structure must be setback at least 54 feet from the ordinary high water level and patio must be setback at least 45 feet from the ordinary high water level. 5. A building permit must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site and before beginning any construction on the site. 6. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review 7. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building 32631 4 permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 8. A permanent 10 - foot native vegetated buffer with permanent buffer signs must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype. Buffer strip averaging may be used to achieve the total buffer area required. The buffer may be configured around the path and stairs. Design plans must be approved by the Water Resources Engineer. 9. A buffer agreement describing the precise location and extent of the buffer strip, as well as the restrictions for activities within the buffer strip, shall be signed by the property owner and the city and shall be recorded against the property at the county recorder's office. The property owner shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated with the buffer strip dedication. 10. The installation of any improvements on the Site shall meet all applicable jurisdictional requirements, including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and all applicable permits shall be obtained prior to any site improvements. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 17th day of January, 2023. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Its: g:\plan\2022 planning cases\22-17 6621 minnewashta parkway\findings of fact and decision 6621 minnewashta parkway (partial approval).docx 33632 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2022-17 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the requested 7.13 percent lot cover variance, denies the requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way, approves the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approves the requested 13- foot front yard setback variance, and approves a 1.13 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a home and patio, subject to the conditions of approval. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as Lot 2, Block 2, Minnewashta Creek First Addition. 3. Conditions.The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot cover may not exceed 5,800 square feet. 2. Eaves and other awnings may project no more than 2.5 feet beyond the granted setback variance. 3. Driveway configuration must comply with Section 20-1122 of the City Code. 4. Primary structure must be setback at least 54 feet from the ordinary high water level and patio must be setback at least 45 feet from the ordinary high water level. 5. A building permit must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site and before beginning any construction on the site. 6. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 7. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building 34633 2 permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 8. A permanent 10 - foot native vegetated buffer with permanent buffer signs must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype. Buffer strip averaging may be used to achieve the total buffer area required. The buffer may be configured around the path and stairs. Design plans must be approved by the Water Resources Engineer. 9. A buffer agreement describing the precise location and extent of the buffer strip, as well as the restrictions for activities within the buffer strip, shall be signed by the property owner and the city and shall be recorded against the property at the county recorder's office. The property owner shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated with the buffer strip dedication. 10. The installation of any improvements on the Site shall meet all applicable jurisdictional requirements, including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and all applicable permits shall be obtained prior to any site improvements. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantiallycompleted, this variance shall lapse. Approved by Planning Commission: January 17, 2023 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) AND: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2023 by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 35634 3 (952) 227-1100 36635 7L-11 Mv APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW submittat Date: lL'l 6'ZL PC Date l-17 -23 ccoatet L-*-)L CITY OI CIIII.IIIASSII{ 60-Day Review Date 2 lzz Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) tr n (Refet to the appropdate Application Checklist for Comprehensive Plan Amendment. E Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ! Single-FamilyResidence required submindl inlomation thdl must accompany this applicdtion) $600 E subdivision (suB) $1OO E Create 3lots or less ! Create over 3 lots....( lots) E Metes & Bounds (2 lots)................. ! Consolidate 1ots...................... E Lot Line Adjustment................... E Final Plat...................... (lncludes $450 escrow for attorney costs)* 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development conltact- n Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) E Variance (VAR).......... .. . ................................... $200 E Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ! Single-Family Residence............................... $150 E Att others...... .................... $275 E zoning Appea|.......................-..-........................... $200 ! Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 XqIE: Wher multiple applications ar3 p.ocessed concuronuy, the appropri.te f6o shall bo chargsd for e.ch application. ... $200 $3 per address $325 $425E Alt others E lnterim Use Permit (lUP) E ln conjunction with Single-Family Residence.. $325 ! Al otners...... ...................... $425 tr n tr Rezoning (REZ) E Phnned Unit Development (PUD).................. $750 n Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 E All others...... ...................... $500 Sign Plan Review................................................... $150 Site Plan Review (SPR) E Administrative ..................... $100 E Commercial/lndustrial Districts*...................... $500 Plus $ 10 per 1,000 square feet of building area:( thousand square feet) 'lnclude number ot glglEg employeesi 'l clude number of4g!! employees: E Residential Districts......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( units) E Notification Sign lcty to instattand remove)............. ! Property Owners' List within 500' lCity to generate after pre-application meeting) .... I Escrow for Recording Docu E Conditional Use Permit E Vacation ments (check all that app tr lv)........... . ... lnterim Use Permit Variance ...................... $50 per document n Site Plan Agreement E Wetland Alteration Permit ! Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) n Easements L- easements)<a< a a) $4gEd0E Deeds TOTAL FEE: Section 2: Required lnformation Description of Proposal 5621 Minnewashta Parkway Excelsior, MN. 55331Property Address or Location Parcet #: 254800030 51 . Single-Family Residential District (RSt Requested Zoning Single-Family Besidential District (RSF) Present Land Use Designation:Residenlial Low Densit Requested Land Use Designation Residential Low Density Existing Use of Property:Primary residence Total Acreage: Present Zoning COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1 100 / Fax: (9521 227 -1110 $ @.ja_ addresses) Legal Description: 002 Wetlands Present? E Yes E tto Echeck box if separate narrative is attached. 37636 APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subiect only lo the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. lf this applicalion has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the informalion and exhibits submitted are true and conect. Name:Conlact: Phone:Address City/Statezip Email: Signature PROPER,IrY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as prope(y owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the liling of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subjeCt only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify thal the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name:Keri & Cordell Mack 6621 Minnewashta Parkway Phone: City/State/Zip: Email: Excelsior, MN- 55331 Cell 612-597-8657 cordell.mack@vmghealth.com Fax: Signature CordellMack Date 12t15t22 PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Address Contact: Phone: Cell: Fax: Name: City/State/Zip Email: Cell: Fax: E Property Owner Via: E Email $ nppticant Via: EIEmail fl Engineer Via: E_Email EF, other' via: Ef Email Who should receive copies of staff reports?*Other Contact lnformation: Address: City/Sta Email: PRINT FORM ! Maited Paper copy Name h SUBTIIT FORM trn Mailed Paper Copy Mailed Paper Copy p E lr,,taiea Paper Copy INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Com plete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents an SAVE FOBMcopy to the city for processing. d payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital Address: noto' - Contact: _ This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before tiling this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specitic ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within'15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of apPlication. Section 3:and Section 4: Notification lnformation 38637 Re: 6621 Minnewashta Parkway Keri and Cordell Mack December 16,2022 Varionce Applicotion City of Chanhossen Honorable Plan Commission, City Council Members and City Planner: We appreciate your diligence and consideration of the variance requests associated with our property at 6621 Minnewashta Parkway. We particularly appreciate the time and effort by city leaders in working with us and our valued architects to address a variety of questions related to the practical difficulties of rebuilding on this parcel of land. As background, our family purchased the home in June of this past year after an extensive search and preference to move into the City of Chanhassen. lt has been our intent to establish residence in Chanhassen with a mapping to Minnetonka School District for well over a year. The targeted improvements to the property and requested variances are all tied to a comprehensive vision. The vision is influenced heavily by several practical difficulties of the lot and existing structure. We have been living in the property for the past six (6) months, and several practical difficulties have been experienced related to safety in entering and exiting the property, lack of street parking, setbacks, and hardscape. The property has a single curb cut, and it is positioned along a curve on Minnewashta Parkway (Parkway). The sight lines entering and exiting the property are challenging, and we have found the issue to be exacerbated in the winter with snow accumulation. Thus far, we have had two near accidents when attempting to back out of the driveway, with drivers along the parkway either traveling at excessive speeds and/or distracted coming around the curve. Our daughter is a new driver obtaining her license in November of this year, and the situation has escalated to a point where our neighbors have invited her to park in their driveway to assure maneuverability in being able to drive forward upon entering the Parkway. We have realized the parking and exiting the property is a major consideration ofthe proposed solutions to the property. When purchasing the property, we didn't have a sound appreciation for what the lack of street parking on the Parkway would entail. With the reality of three (3) drivers in our family and inclusion of guests, parking and safety exitinB and entering the property has been exacerbated. lt has been surprising to us in how cumbersome it is to ensure safety with limited hardscape in managing a small number of multiple vehicles. The 39638 As part of our site plan, we envision improving the sight lines when entering and existing the property while maintaining existing side yard setbacks. Associated with safety is the practical difficulty of hardscape and limitations with the relative size of the driveway to accommodate the space necessary to turn around on the property. As referenced above, the lack of street parking further exacerbates this issue. A very necessary variance is the overage of hardcover. We understand the percentage is fixed but the engineers have noted mitigating the watershed and reducing impervious can be achieved by incorporating best management practice rain gardens and a naturalvegetation bufferalongthe lakeshore. Adding additional hardcover for parking purposes significantly reduce life safety regarding parking/existing the property. Another practical difficulty for this property, requiring a variance, is the compliant buildable area. The existing lot shape is irregular and dictates the buildable area does not allow a home to adequately fit in the area. The current home, as it sits, is already non-compliant. We have worked with the city staff in proposing a modest sized home that largely conforms and meets our family's functional needs. As shown in our supporting submittals, we are NOT proposing habitable space to be any closer to the lake shore than what is exhibited in the current structure. Similarly, we are not proposing any outdoor deck or patio space to be any closer than what exists with the current home. The existing lakeside setback violation was not caused by us, and we respected the existing setback. Absent approval of this variance, there is not a reasonable habitable structure that could be reasonably rebuilt. At the city's suggestion, the proposed home will maintain the existing non-conforming lakeside setback from the OHWIL (albeit requiring a variance) and pushes the violations of the setback to street side, which is less desirable but understand the lakeside setback is already an issue. The proposed lakeside patio maintains or is not worse than the existing deck setback. The side yard setbacks for the proposed home meets the city's zoning requirements. The variance necessary would only be to maintain the existing driveway as the setback to achieve proper back-out and maneuverability form the garage. The city engineer requested the removal of the existing turn-around in the driveway which we were able to accommodate in the design and felt was a sound request to improve the property. The property as it sits is not compliant with current zoning regulations, even to rebuild exactly the structure, deck, patios, and driveway sits it would need a variance in everything we are asking we are just proposing a new layout more suitable to our family. reality is that with two or three cars in the driveway it is very difficult to exit the property safely for an adult yet alone younger inexperienced drivers. 40639 We are excited to call 6621 Minnewashta Parkway home, and we look fonrvarci to ongoing engagement with the broader community. We appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this application for the proposed replacement structure. Respectfully submitted, /ttt,u Keri and Cordell Mack Cc: Peter Eskuche Erin Tadych 41640 42641 PROPOSED HOME PROPOSED PATIO 21'-6PROPOSED STRUCTURE29'-8"EXISTING STRUCTURE18'-0"PROPOSED STRUCTURE60'-3"EXISTING STRUCTURE62'-0"PROPOSED54'-6"PROPOSED PATIO47'-6"EXISTING DECKMAINTAIN EXISTING PAVED SETBACK PROPOSED HOME PROPOSED PATIO BUILDABLE AREA 7060504030802010NWES0 20'40'60'80'SUMMER SOLSTICESUNRISEWINTER SOLSTICESUNRISESUMMER SOLSTICESUNRISEWINTER SOLSTICESUNRISEEXISTING TO BE REMOVED HARDCOVER KEY EXISTING SITE PLAN HARDCOVER KEY PROPOSED SITE PLAN (Existing overlay shown for reference) EXISTING STRUCTURE (DEMO) EXISTING DECK (DEMO) EXISTING FOR REFERENCE PROPOSED STRUCTURE PROPOSED PATIO PROPOSED DRIVEWAY- EXISTING SETBACKS BUILDABLE SITE SHEET L1 REVIEW 08 DECEMBER 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 43642 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' #LayID TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 10'-1-1/8"" APPROX. SF =2,565 FINISHED + 1,136 GARAGE MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 8'-0" 4'-0"8'-0"2'-8"8'-0"3'-0"FLUSHFLUSHDOWN 6" DOWN 6" GARAGE GREAT ROOM DW COOKTOP DINING LAUNDRY COVERED ENTRY TERRACE WOOD STONE WOODWOOD WOOD WOOD WOOD DW TILE WOOD WOOD TILE TILE DOWN 6" DOWN 6" 8'-0" 16'-0" 8'-0" 16'-0" 8'-0" 3'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 3'-0"8'-0"6'-0"8'-0" 2'-8" 8'-0" 3'-0"8'-0"2'-4"8'-0" 2'-8" 8'-0" 2'-8" 8'-0" 2'-6" 8'-0" 2'-8" 8'-0" 6'-0" ELEC ROLL-UP HOSE REEL 30" FRZR 30" REFDBLOVENS O. BEDROOM O. CLOSET O. BATHSCULLERY GAS FPLC KITCHEN 4 SEASON PORCH WORK AREA CLOSET FOYER POWDER W/D TV TV MIRROR MUDROOM 14'-6"x 15'-9" 13'-9"x 14'-2" 12'-0"x 22'-0"16'-6"x 22'-0" 7'-8"x 7'-0" 20'-0"x 13'-0" 10'-2"x 9'-8" 13'-8"x 10'-0" 13'-9"x 5'-9" 5'-0"x 6'-8" 5'-6"x 8'-6" MOP SINK HOT/COLD 24'-0"x 35'-10" 41'-3"x 13'-10" DOWN 6"CLIENTSHEET A2 REVIEW 08 DECEMBER 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 44643 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' TYP CEILING HEIGHT = 9'-1-1/8"" APPROX. SF =1,179 FINISHED + 844 BONUS SPACE + 277 MECH/STORAGE UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 202202 104D 104D 105D 104D 104D7'-0"2'-6"7'-0"2'-8"7'-0"2'-8"7'-0" 2'-6" 7'-0" 2'-6"7'-0"2'-8"7'-0"4'-0"7'-0"4'-0"7'-0" 2'-6"7'-0"5'-0"7'-0" 4'-0"7'-0"4'-0"7'-0"3'-0"7'-0" 2'-8" 104D 104D 7'-0"2'-8"7'-0"2'-8"7'-0" 2'-6" CARPET CARPET CARPET CARPET CARPET CARPET CARPETCARPET TILE TILE TILE LVT LVT LVT LVT STAIR 104D BENCH WDLAUNDRY BEDROOM 4 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 2 KIDS REC ROOM BUNK ROOM FLEX SPACE TV TV TV SNACK BAR ENSUITE BATH 2 SHARED BATH BONUS BATH MECHANICAL STORAGE WIC 3WIC 2 UPPER HALL LINEN STORAGE 5'-0"x5'-0"5'-0"x5'-0" 12'-3"x15'-8" 15'-9"x8'-7" 10'-0"x10'-6"CLIENTSHEET A3 REVIEW 08 DECEMBER 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 45644 FOUNDATION -4'-0" M.L. SUBFLOOR 9XX.X' ±0" U.L. SUBFLOOR +11'-11 7/8" U.L. CEILING +21'-1" 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 EAST ELEVATION 2 WEST ELEVATION SHEET A1 REVIEW 08 DECEMBER 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 46645 FOUNDATION -4'-0" M.L. SUBFLOOR 9XX.X' ±0" U.L. SUBFLOOR +11'-11 7/8" U.L. CEILING +21'-1" M.L. SUBFLOOR 9XX.X' ±0" U.L. SUBFLOOR +11'-11 7/8" U.L. CEILING +21'-1" 12'14'16' GRAPHIC SCALE 4'0'2'6'8'10' 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 NORTH ELEVATION SHEET A2 REVIEW 08 DECEMBER 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 47646 0'2' GRAPHIC SCALE 1'369 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3' SHEET A3 REVIEW 08 DECEMBER 2022 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2022 MINNE SHORES 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, EXCELSIOR, MN 48647 49648 50649 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (PARTIAL APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of Keri and Cordell Mack for a variance to place a parking area within the right-of-way, a shoreland setback variance, a front yard setback variance, and a lot cover variance to facilitate the construction of a home and patio on a property zoned Planned Unit Development: Residential District (PUDR) – Planning Case 2022-17. On March 20, 2023, the City Council heard an appeal of the Planning Commission January 17, 2023 decision to deny the requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way, approve the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approve the requested 12-foot front yard setback variance, and approve a 1.13 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a home and patio, subject to conditions. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The City Council makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development: Residential District. 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 2, Minnewashta Creek First Addition 3. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding:Accommodating the reasonable use of substandard and nonconforming parcels is in harmony with the intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan; however, Section 20-71 the City Code states the intention of the nonconforming use code is to prevent the enlargement and expansion of nonconforming structures and to encourage the eventual elimination of the nonconformity. The applicant’s prosed increase to the property’s lot cover represents a significant increase to a nonconformity and is not consistent with intent of the City Code. The applicant’s requested front yard and shoreland setback variances are consistent with city’s policy of allowing structures to maintain their existing nonconforming setbacks, and the City Code’s goal of providing a viable building pad for properties zoned for single-family residential use. 650 2 b.When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The applicant has the ability to construct a viable driveway and reasonably sized house with typical amenities without exceeding the property’s existing lot cover. Granting a variance allowing the applicant to maintain the existing nonconforming lot cover provides reasonable use. The proposed width of the home and deck is broadly consistent with the width of the existing structure, and the narrowness of the lot does not allow for a reasonable home configuration meeting required shoreland and front yard setbacks. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding:The requested front yard and shoreland setback variances are the result of the parcel’s narrowness not providing a viable buildable area. The constraints posed by the parcel’s width are unique to the property and were not created by the landowner. The parcel is larger than the minimum lot size required by its zoning district and the parcel already benefits from having a nonconforming lot cover above what would be permitted by the city’s zoning code. The requested lot cover variances are not the result of any factor unique to the parcel, but rather are due to the size and configuration of the house and driveway proposed by the applicant. A more modestly sized or alternatively configured home would fit on the parcel while allowing for a driveway configuration providing safe street access without increasing the property’s lot cover beyond the existing nonconforming amount. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The applicant is requesting a lot cover variance to accommodate the construction of a relatively large home on parcel that exceeds the city’s minimum lot area requirements. The city’s longstanding policy has been to require properties with nonconforming lot cover to maintain their existing lot cover, unless the applicant demonstrates that the existing lot cover and substandard size of the parcel do not provide reasonable use. This policy helps to prevent the overcrowding of lots by limiting the size of homes and their accessory uses and encouraging homeowners to design homes that work within the constraints created by their property. 651 3 With regards to this neighborhood, many homes are older and could potentially be replaced or expanded in the near future. As this is the first proposed rebuild in this area, the variance granted here will be used by other nearby property owners as a guide for what they can reasonably expect the city to approve. Granting this variance and switching from a policy of maintaining the existing nonconforming lot cover to permitting new construction to increase lot cover would significantly alter the character of the neighborhood by increasing the amount of lot cover present in the shoreland overlay district and allowing the construction of larger footprint homes with more accessory structures. Increased lot cover has the potential to negatively impact the quality of the lake by causing increased runoff and reducing the amount of greenspace present to slow down and absorb the runoff. f. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 4.The planning report #2022-17, dated January 17, 2023, and City Council report #2022- 17, dated March 20, 2023, prepared by MacKenzie Young-Walters is incorporated herein DECISION The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the requested 3.57 percent lot cover variance, approves the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approves the requested 12-foot front yard setback variance, and approves a 1.13 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a home and deck, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot cover may not exceed 5,800 square feet. 2. Eaves and other awnings may project no more than 2.5 feet beyond the granted setback variance. 3. Driveway configuration must comply with Section 20-1122 of the City Code. 4. Primary structure must be setback at least 54 feet from the ordinary high water level and patio must be setback at least 45 feet from the ordinary high water level. 5. A building permit must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site and before beginning any construction on the site. 6. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 7. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 8. A permanent 10-foot native vegetated buffer with permanent buffer signs must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype. Buffer strip averaging may be used to achieve the total buffer area required. The buffer may be configured around the path and stairs. Design plans must be approved by the Water Resources Engineer. 9. A buffer agreement describing the precise location and extent of the buffer strip, as well as the restrictions for activities within the buffer strip, shall be signed by the property owner and 652 4 the city and shall be recorded against the property at the county recorder's office. The property owner shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated with the buffer strip dedication. 10. The installation of any improvements on the site shall meet all applicable jurisdictional requirements, including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and all applicable permits shall be obtained prior to any site improvements. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 20th day of March, 2023. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Its: g:\plan\2022 planning cases\22-17 6621 minnewashta parkway\findings of fact and decision 6621 minnewashta parkway_cc.docx 653 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2022-17 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen City Council denies the requested 3.57 percent lot cover variance, approves the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approves the requested 12- foot front yard setback variance, and approves a 1.13 percent lot cover variance for the construction of a home and deck, subject to the conditions of approval. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as Lot 2, Block 2, Minnewashta Creek First Addition. 3. Conditions.The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot cover may not exceed 5,800 square feet. 2. Eaves and other awnings may project no more than 2.5 feet beyond the granted setback variance. 3. Driveway configuration must comply with Section 20-1122 of the City Code. 4. Primary structure must be setback at least 54 feet from the ordinary high water level and deck must be setback at least 45 feet from the ordinary high water level. 5. A building permit must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site and before beginning any construction on the site. 6. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 7. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 654 2 8. A permanent 10-foot native vegetated buffer with permanent buffer signs must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype. Buffer strip averaging may be used to achieve the total buffer area required. The buffer may be configured around the path and stairs. Design plans must be approved by the Water Resources Engineer. 9. A buffer agreement describing the precise location and extent of the buffer strip, as well as the restrictions for activities within the buffer strip, shall be signed by the property owner and the city and shall be recorded against the property at the county recorder's office. The property owner shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated with the buffer strip dedication. 10. The installation of any improvements on the Site shall meet all applicable jurisdictional requirements, including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and all applicable permits shall be obtained prior to any site improvements. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. Approved by City Council: March 20, 2023 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) AND: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2023 by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 655 From: bryonbequette@gmail.com <bryonbequette@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2023 1:30 PM To: Young-Walters, MacKenzie <mwalters@chanhassenmn.gov>; Potter, Jenny <jpotter@chanhassenmn.gov> Cc: dbequette@comcast.net Subject: Hearing on 6621 Minnewashta Pkwy, Jan 17, 2023 Ms. Potter and Mr. Young-Walters: We are sending this note in response to the proposed variance being reviewed by the Planning Commission this evening for 6621 Minnewashta Parkway. We live adjacent (North) to this property and have done so for several years. As such, we have intimate knowledge of the day-to-day management of the site as well as some of the challenges experienced living on the Parkway. We reviewed the proposed site plan with Keri and Cordell Mack, and we are supportive of the requested variances. A few things of substance that should be noted during the Planning Commission’s deliberation include: 1. All of the homes to the east of the Parkway have inherent setback challenges as you are well aware. The proposed setbacks and site lines are comforting to us and will enhance the neighborhood. 2. Our property shares a side lot set back with 6621, and snow removal management is of particular importance. We both end up using part of our hardscape in accommodating snow build up as the Parkway hinders effective snow removal to other parts of our yard. Effectively, part of our driveway is used for snow storage (as it is for 6621). 3. Our homes are on the east, non-sidewalk side of the Parkway so our yards take a significant hit with snow accumulation from routine Parkway plowing. The snow accumulations in the right of way create site line challenges and safety concerns upon exiting the property. I know this is a concern for Keri and Cordell with a newer driver in the family. 1. There should be some accommodation on hardscape coverage to effectively manage snow as the Parkway creates challenges not present with other Chanhassen homeowners on a typical residential street. 4. All of the homeowners on the Parkway have to make certain accommodations to ensure safety of family and guests. Without access to street parking, you are simply left with your driveway and lot to manage not only the parking but also the logistics to assure no one backs onto the Parkway upon exiting. This requires adequate driveway square footage unique to the properties east of the Parkway. I believe all of the existing homes have some accommodation in driveway design to allow vehicles to maneuver and exit forward. 1. Keri and Cordell’s daughter, Lauren, uses our driveway to park a vehicle thus affording greater flexibility with the 6621 driveway. We often see Keri and Cordell out moving cars or assisting family and friends with safe exits from the property. Some practical accommodation is required as the site simply tries to afford what others have access to in terms of street parking. 2. In essence, driveways on the Parkway need to be large enough to accommodate some movement of vehicles on the property to ensure safety and compare reasonably to street parking accommodations afforded to other homeowners. 656 5. Finally, all of these site limitations are further exacerbated with the Parkway itself, including the overall amount of traffic, the type of heavy industrial usage on the road, and frankly the excessive speeds that persist despite ongoing policing. In summary, we have reviewed the plans in detail, and feel that they are well thought out and truly make sense based on the situation and we wholly support the variances requested. We would be happy to discuss any of these points with you further. Please represent our perspective and comments with the Planning Commission and in turn the City Council. Sincerely, Bryon & Debbie Bequette Bryon Bequette Attorney at Law Bequette & Associates 6601 Minnewashta Pkwy Chanhassen, MN 55331 (612) 850-2322 bryonbequette@gmail.com Website: Bequetteandassociates.com 657 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 17, 2023 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chair Noyes called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Eric Noyes, Kelsey Alto, Erik Johnson, Perry Schwartz, Ryan Soller, Edward Goff. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner; Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer, Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner PUBLIC PRESENT: Keri & Cordell Mack 6621 Minnewashta Parkway Peter Eskuche 18318 Minnetonka Blvd, Wayzata Mary Van Beusekom 6610 Rocky Island, Excelsior GENERAL BUSINESS: 1. Chair and Vice Chair Positions Senior Planner Al-Jaff stated that former Chairman Mark Von Oven was elected to City Council. While the Vice Chair acts as the Chair during the absence of the Chair, the Planning Commission must appoint a new Chair and Vice Chair to serve until April so that there is someone to serve as backup for the current Vice Chair. A new election will be held on April 4, 2023. Commissioner Schwartz moved, Commissioner Goff seconded to nominate Commissioner Alto as Vice Chair. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Schwartz seconded to nominate Commissioner Noyes as Chairman. All voted in favor and the motions carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 6621 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME Associate Planner Young-Walters gave a presentation on the item, noting the Applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and replace with a new single-family home and patio; they are also proposing a designated guest parking area that encroaches into the city’s right-of- way. The Applicant has noted it is unsafe to back out on to Minnewashta Parkway and the road does not allow on-street parking. The Applicant also noted they are improving the non- conformity with regards to the lake setback by moving the house further back from the lake, and 658 Planning Commission Minutes – January 17, 2023 2 that the constricted building pad does not allow for building on the lot without setback variances. They also propose vegetative buffers and rain gardens to offset. Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer noted the proposed plans show increased impervious area and one concern is that the storm water would run directly into Lake Minnewashta. The Applicant proposed a vegetative buffer and two rain gardens; Staff’s assessment is that increase in impervious surface cannot be offset by those improvements as they are required within the city nonetheless. He spoke about the parking pad within city right-of-way and noted Engineering cannot be in support due to Article 17-5 of the City Ordinance. Engineering feels there is adequate room on the site for parking and a turnaround. Mr. Young-Walters spoke about practical difficulties and noted staff supports the requested front and shoreland variances, as the width of the lot does not provide a viable building pad. Regarding the driveway, the Applicant would have reasonable use and quite a bit of off-street parking even if the segment that encroaches into the right-of-way were removed. The four-car garage accommodates parking with four cars in front of the garage plus another three cars. Mr. Young-Walters noted the driveway is decreased from existing and the home footprint has increased by 1,800 square feet. Staff believes there is reasonable use on this parcel without the requested lot cover variance. Staff recommends approval of the setback variances and denial of the requested lot cover and parking area variances. Cordell Mack, Applicant, shared about his family’s 25 year history in the area noting the concept is to build a home that keeps their family and extended family near. He appreciates city staff’s involvement with the complexity on the property. Mr. Mack noted the family lives in the current home and they know what it is like trying to move cars around so a 16-year-old can exit the property safely onto Minnewashta Parkway. He shared about the difficulties with snow removal due to limited setbacks and the difficulties in moving the cars around to exit the property and the lack of off-street parking. They have lived this reality and are not asking for “wishes” that are not practical. Mr. Mack spoke about excessive speeds and industrial trucks using the road and stated they must get this right to enter and exit the property safely. He noted this is trying to accomplish a project that is minimal to their family needs, that they can grow with, they can keep their children around them, and provide safety. Peter Eskuche appreciates staff’s work on this project and noted the biggest “miss” is the fact that it is a very low lot and they cannot have a basement. To accommodate mechanical storage they must make it up in the garage and cannot build a three-story house and still meet the conforming building height. In analyzing the driveway, the circle drive that is currently there is very challenging, and he demonstrated that the current design allows every garage stall and guest spot to back out and exit safely. The additional space for the house is due to the lack of basement and is a practical difficulty. Mr. Eskuche noted the Applicant accommodated the City’s recommendation and pushed the house toward the street which pushed the car stalls toward the street, as well. He spoke about the rain gardens and vegetation noting the Applicants are trying to mitigate everything hardcover so that it is not going into the lake. Regarding scale of the house, there is data that shows local cities’ such as Minnetonka whose permits show an average house size of 4,300 square feet; this house is slightly larger than that and is a multi-generational house. He believes the house is in the spirit of the Code and is reasonable. 659 Planning Commission Minutes – January 17, 2023 3 Commissioner Alto understands how frustrating parking is and asked if that is a top priority, and if it is the number one concern, why did they purchase a home on a street that did not have street parking? Mr. Mack replied they honestly did not know how big of an issue it would be until living in the home. Commissioner Alto asked if moving from a four-car turnaround to a three-car turnaround would make a large difference to the Applicant. Mr. Mack does not know. He noted it is not just where the car is placed but where the other car is and whether a car can safely back up without hitting two other cars while exiting. It is a rubix cube and he knows there is need for ample space and flexibility with younger drivers around their property. He noted they want to be collaborative and find solutions with the city; they are focused on the function of having a property that works well. Commissioner Schwartz noted allowing this exception in the right-of-way would open the floodgates with everyone wanting an exception. He thinks the burden is on the Applicant to conform to City Code to the greatest extent possible. He asked if there is way to put their heads together that would work for the family and conform to City Code which would be the best approach. Mr. Mack noted if the spirit of the project is understood and it is literally about the right-of-way issue, they are more than happy to accommodate and collaborate on that. His only comment is that this is a unique property. Commissioner Soller wonders about some space being eliminated in the parking area. He also wants to think about the hardcover variance as that is potentially the toughest one. Mr. Mack noted if the concern is around the overall lot coverage that is much more of a threshold issue that will determine the outcome of the project. Commissioner Alto understands Lake Minnewashta lots are extremely unique and challenging and noted the Commission has to be consistent in the way they are handled. Approving things like this is how they continue to get larger and larger houses with lot covers and it snowballs. She wants to be sure the next person doesn’t ask for 10% lot coverage and then the next person asks for 12%. Ms. Alto asked what 7% looks like in this case? Mr. Young-Walters noted it would be substantial and provided context onscreen showing the existing home and the expanded footprint which is an approximately 1,800 foot increase an almost doubles the footprint of the home. He noted about 450 square feet of that expansion is offset by the removal of other hardcover on the property. The homeowner could make additional redesigns (remove additional patio, use a deck over grass) but they could not get the 3,700 square foot footprint while maintaining the 2,500 square foot driveway. 660 Planning Commission Minutes – January 17, 2023 4 Commissioner Schwartz asked about the difference between a rain garden and retention pond. Mr. Henricksen replied a rain garden has some sort of infiltration and native planting and does not hold water while a retention pond holds water. Chairman Noyes opened the public hearing. Mary Van Beusekom, 6610 Rocky Island Lane, would like to know if the building would interfere with her view of the lake. Mr. Young-Walters believes the peak of the roof is in the mid-thirties, approximately 35 feet. He does not know the fall of that property relative to her home. The Applicant is not requiring a height variance as the height proposed is permitted under City Code. Mr. Young-Walters noted the city received a note from a neighbor (included in the packet) who expressed their support for the requested variance and noted the challenges with parking and snow storage. Chairman Noyes closed the public hearing. Commissioner Soller asked about precedence with the right-of-way and asked if any other variances encroach into the right-of-way on Minnewashta Parkway. Mr. Young-Walters replied in the negative, not to his knowledge. There are non-conforming encroachments such as a house to the north where a turnaround may go into the right-of-way a few feet. He would have to do some homework to determine whether it is illegal or legal non- conforming. Two have non-conforming dual accesses creating a U-shaped driveway, one of which was required to be removed as part of a variance for a garage expansion. Within the city, the Horseshoe Curve variance is the only time he is aware of the city granting a parking pad in the encroachment and staff was not in support for many of the same reasons as with this application. Commissioner Soller asked regarding hardcover, does the city see many variances granted greater than 1.13% lot cover? Mr. Young-Walters replied in the affirmative, however it requires a huge amount of context. One property was granted a 3% lot cover variance but was a 1,600 square foot property and lot cover was required to be removed. On Red Cedar Point, one will see variances going into the 30% range, however lots there are substandard and half the size of City Code. In his opinion, going by percentage is not the best metric because it is inter-related with lot size. Chair Noyes noted this calculation is approximately 1,332 square feet larger than existing. He asked how many on the lake have been seen that are 1,332 square feet? Mr. Young-Walters needs to do research to give an intelligent answer. He noted 1,300 is a lot and it is pretty rare that the city gives variances over 30%. Typically it is because of a smaller lot. He does not recall ever seeing a total lot cover in the 7,000 range as an eligible variance. He 661 Planning Commission Minutes – January 17, 2023 5 clarified that staff would support a 1.13% lot cover variance which is the extent of the existing non-conformity. Commissioner Soller asked about the uniqueness or hardship of not having a basement on the lot. Mr. Young-Walters replied staff believes a house of reasonable size can be constructed within the confines of the Code. Chair Noyes believes residents need to have the opportunity to use and develop their properties. However it must be within the guidelines the city has put together. He realizes this lot has practical difficulties, however every time they talk about lakeshore property, they are talking about practical difficulties. Chair Noyes noted they could set a precedent here that creates an avalanche situation because this is a big variance. He thinks there could be some room to look at redesign efforts and make the house smaller; he stated 1,300 square feet is a lot and this is a mammoth house. Commissioner Alto agreed. Commissioner Soller clarified three stories is out of the question due to the height. Mr. Young-Walters replied in the affirmative. Commissioner Goff feels for the homeowners but noted the Commission cannot set a precedent. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Goff seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the requested 7.13% lot cover variance, denies the requested variance for a parking area in the right-of-way, approves the requested 30-foot shoreland setback variance, approves the requested 13-foot front yard setback variance, and approves a 1.13% lot cover variance for the construction of a home and patio, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED DECEMBER 6, 2022 Commissioner Goff noted the summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated December 6, 2022 as presented. CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE: Mr. Young-Walters shared the city has rolled out the short-term rental licensing with four sent in so far. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Goff seconded, to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:07 p.m. 662 Planning Commission Minutes – January 17, 2023 6 Submitted by Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner 663 City Council Item March 20, 2023 Item City Manager Performance Review File No.Item No: K.1 Agenda Section CLOSED SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City Council will meet in Closed Session with the City Manager to review her performance on her employment anniversary. The Mayor will provide a summary of the results at the next regular meeting. The City is authorized to hold a closed session for this purpose by Minn. Stat. § 13D.05; 13D.05, subd. 3. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 664 ATTACHMENTS 665